The URL can be used to link to this page

141 DAYTON ST 2.pdf8-tt-1998 4,42AM F MrDAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 2E,9 323rd , ........ SE ...............•............... *: t f -t ...., .I. 1t52AN CIT ..?tvs :' ......... .. ... .......... OF Edll ND SbJIG1••l9ILLEl ;# Z c1tv of edm nds � land use anblicat n ` O ARCHITECTURAL. DESIGN SOARD tw. 0 COMP PLAN AMENDMEENT 0 CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE � ZONE CI HOME OCCUPATION © FORMAL SUBDIVISION DATE REC'D BY C1 SHORT SUBDIVISION pSE 1 RECI»lPT� 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CI PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPME 4T HEARING DATE Ci OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT . 0 HE 0SITAFF Q PS p ADS © cc STREET VACATION 0 REZONE 0 SHORELINE PERMIT ACTION TAK N: Q VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION 0 APPROVE 0 D1=NiIWD d APPEALED Q OTHER AftMnAIa 1 z F- ® Applicant 9F'F�A * L—C; g Addroas P, b, i as !2F v Property Address or Location p !_ Property Owner 5—;-At 9 _AE z L Address u.. p; Agent �-3J-J-n�Et2S - z;; ul v_s, Address i�W��1�aE v I - - Tex Ace #-4S2-1-4 - i=, z Legal Description :Q= �r Details of Protect or Proposed Use t» VT4C-r 19ACII IT--e 0"* Q. Son. -ZS , Twp. -21 f4 Rng. The underulgnad $ppGaant, and hkat her/ i#8 h8 ,and *salons, In Onakloratlon of tho processing of t appltmgon agno" to rates", ln4arnnlfy, dafond and hold the City of I Edmonds hwralaaa from any and damages, Including rassonable ahornay's fees, aila np from any mWon or lInfradion based in wholo or in part tip false, misleading, Inaccurate or frlComolete Infoirmallon furnished by the applicant. #nisi herl its agents employees. The undmioned applicant grants heel bar/ ita perm ian for btic *tW and tho staff of the City of Edmonds enter the subject property for the purpose of Ins p¢ct opun and po_,�-ai arid4nt to thiS,"loatior� TU RE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ 2 t TES INC. ERR sere ae g RMIM-. '� � ��! �� 31Igt1�. t, �� . I � Jet"' (��(�_ ��ri�Cl, �- — .. �� ! � � �� N,�s`lf"l" 1 3} t f r { `vU,) i t 0 w =� LL4 O'. V V' LoIW--A Z _:�t_.tcVLlilc�NS S� ® ® amumm two m E.d p e bssl t_tvee t GOMMUI tl'C�( O fa Ed m - v-�.. Nax: 4tr: 1-th(�2 t�Ires �So`•e` _ _ ® >✓AS'f' ELE�lA-t't©h.t 'gip _ 4e I" Sol i THE JOHNSTON ASSOCIATES INC. AWHITECTS AI.A: INTERIOR DESIGNERS SI5 fHpi6@1 AYFlAIE ' yy:Q� OM-0M@9.:ID. WAW1St01! 4W1&9-Tt11 : 77, J^tf....... f"04 9-14-1998 1.41PM . DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 259 9230 P.1 I DA f1D IEVANS AND ASSOCiATIES, Z TBLBCOF.Y TRANSMITTAL a716UV49Matine S �_ T0: Dlipi FAX N 771.0221 Vww±Driw, Sw4v C Secretary PHON NO: 771.0220 d01+ FIRM: Edmonds Plalnninp # OF p nag: 7 Eva^ wad 98-1 to X FROM: Jim Miller } PROD.: MNGR0001 1tk 42S,259�4e99 J F cn LL Ove: September 14,1996 as INo: Updated Mailing List br Senior Fez: 425259-MO Lu 0 Assisted Housing CUP coPles:Mark MetNeugnton FAX N 773.0409 LLLa ..4. ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW: Q REOULAR MAIL ❑ OVERNIGHT MAIL S'u. (� COURIER 13 NIA io1— COMMENTS: Lu j+ Attached is an updated address notification list for he CLIP application for the 2nd dt Dayton site, as requested. Please :2 of comas me with any additional comments or quest ons. Thank you. or UUJ �z v o z P.-UM 9,0o011adaata 1w 9-14-1998 1:42PM F 232703-1-045-0004 ECSASSOCIATES 3226 CASCADIA AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA 98144 232703.1.046.0004 OCCUPANT OR CAMEREW'S 176 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 96020 232703-1-04UO04 OCCUPANT 192 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 9802D 232703-1-046.0004 OCCUPANT 192 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98202 232703-1.045.0004 OCCUPANTICITY JUICE & JAM 190 SUNSET AVE., SUITE 123 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-080.0004 EDMONDS LUMBER COMPANY & HARDWARE 228 5TH AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-081-0003 PORT OF EDMOND$ 160 W. DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 08020 232703-4-085-0009 NELSON, MARVIN K.JLE$LIE A. 209 DAYTON ST., 0101 EDONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-089-0005 NELSON, MARVIN R.1LI:SLIE A, 209 DAYTON ST., 4101 EDMONDS, WA 08020 232703.4-093.0009 LORETTA LIND 222 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 1,I)AVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 259 0 2701-1.045.00 2327 5-0004 OCCUPANT OR OLDIES OCCUPANT OR THE LACEMAKER 180 SUNSET AV . 176 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 8020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-00 232703-1-0454=4 OCCUPANT OR HAI PARK OCCUPANT OR HOMESTYLE LAUNDRY' 182 SUNSET' AV . 184 SUNSET AVE, EDMONDS, WA 8020 EDMONDS; WA 98024 EDMONDS, WA OCCUPANT OR tHE ASSOCIATES 194 SUNSET A EDMOND$. WA 08020 OCCUPANT OR NTHIS 190 SUNSET AVE.,SUITE 119 EOMONOS, WA P8020, BARKER, FLOYq &JANET 815 9TH AVE. N. EDMONDS. WA P8020 OCCUPANT 146 3RD AVE. S EDMONDS, WA OLYMPIC DRIVI 1233 OLYMPIC EDMONDS, WA 10CCUPANWPIN�HAM'S PILLOW 202 3RD AVENU S. EDMONDS, WA 8020 RALPH SOREN7 222 3RD AVE, S EDMONDS, WA P. 2 0 232701-1-045.0004 OCCUPANTMATERPRONT ANTIQUE MALL 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA $8020 232703-1-046.0004 OCCUPANT. SUITE 129E 190 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-046-0004 OCCUPANT/ACCENT DESIGN INTERIORS 190 SUNSET AVE.. SUITE I I I EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4.081.OW3 OCCUPANT/HARBOUR SQ, BLDG, #3 110 W. DAYTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 2327034-052-0005 MILLER, ROBIN L. & CAROL 17358 BEACH DR. NE SEATTLE. WA 98156 232703.4-DS7.WU7 RESIDENT 223 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA W020 232703-4-092•WDD AGLOW INTERNATIONAL P. O. BOX 1546 LYNNWOOD, WA 28046-1548 232703-4-D19-0106 040-003-001-W04 WASH. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 47300 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 rr r F t l - r 9-14-1998 1.42PM FP nDAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 269 3222 4548-002-001.0006 " 4548-002-001-00 4540-002-004-M03 ROSEMA HENNING OCCUPANTIALA 5KA NW PUBL, NORHAWK INVESTMENTS, INC. 101 JAMES ST. 130 2ND AVE. S, 120 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 EOMONDS, WA 38020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4648-002-GIU002 LCM " 144 RAILROAD AVE.. #204 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001.001.0008 SROWNLEE, WILLIAM & DELORES 553 ELM ST. EDMONDS. WA 98020 4545-001-005.0004. 3RD AVE. PLAZA LTD PTNSHP. 20251ST AVE., 01000 SEATTLE. WA 98121 4543-001-017-0000 OCCUPANT 202 MAIN ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 6464-000-001-0005 HELDE, ERLINE 6 M.A. 210 3RD AVE. M. #A EDMONDS, WA 09020 6464.000-004-0002 WILLIAMS, DONALD & PATRICIA 210 3RD AVE. S. #0 EOMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-103-0007 TELFORD, RICHARD & BLISS 200 JAMES ST., 0103 EDMONDS, WA 08020 6782-000-106.0004 MCMANUS,STEPHEN P. 0. BOX 91006 SAS0701 $EATTLE, WA 98111 6782.000-201-0008 ARGENT, CAROLL S. 200 JAMES ST., #201 EDMONDS. WA 98020 PRECISION 110 MAIN ST. EDMONDS, WA 4548-001-001-0( RESIDENT 221 JAMES ST. EDMONDS, WA 3110 AVE. P LTD PTNSHP 2021 WVE., 1000 SEATTLE, WA 9 121 HOPPER, HARO D & CAROLEE 630 BELL ST., 3 1TE 1000 EDMONDS, WA P8020 AUST, DOROTHt G. 210 3RD AVE. S,j #B EDMONDS, WA P0, JENSEN STERLIE V ET UX 200 JAMES ST., fl0l EDMONDS, WA PSM YOUNKIN. MER41LL & DOROTHY 200 DAMES ST., P104 EDMONDS, WA P0020 4949-002-017-0008 RIO PETROL. INC. 100 2ND AVE S., #11 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4648-001-003-MO TINDALL, THOMAS R. 126 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4646-001-047.0000 MAR BEL MARBLE, INC. P. 0. BOX 1449 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-023-0002 OCCUPANT/SEA MOUNTAIN INS, 1312ND AVE. S., #C EDMONDS, WA 98020 6444.000-003.0003 GARRISON, REV. LIVING TRUST 210 3RD AVE. S., #C EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-102-0008 HOOD, WILLIAM B., JR. 200 JAMES ST., #102 EDMONDS, WA 0 020 6782-000-105.0005 HASSON, ROBERT & MARCELLA 200 JAMES ST., #105 EDMONDS, WA 98020 678MD-107-00 3 6782.000.108.0002 LOIS C, MASTI`c i:S BALLARD, RONALD & LORETTA 200 JAMES Sr., 107 200 JAMES ST., #108 EDMONDS. WA 8020 EDMONDS. WA OW20 P. 3 6782-000.202.00 07 6782-000-203-00006 SEABORG, HAR LD & ELLIE PARKS, THOMAS 0. 200 JAMES ST., 1202 200 JAMES ST. 0203 EDMOND$. WA 60020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 v y' 0, 9-14-1998 1:43PM FROM DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 208 259 3230 678ZO006204.0006 6782-000.705.0 67a7r0aa,2OS-0003 EVARTS, ARLENE F. MEDALIA. MICR & GENE DAVIDSON. MARGUERITE G. 200 JAMES ST., 4204 200 JAMES ST.. 1206 200 JAMES ST., #206 EDMONDS, WA 08020 EDMONDS, WA 8020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-OW207-0009 67882-000.20" 02 6702-000-301-0007 WUSCHER, RALPH & CLUTE KROON, WILLI & LUCILLE HSATUM. ART14UR & LOUISE 200 JAMES ST.. 4207 200 JAMES ST., 208 200 JAMES ST.. #301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 8020 EDMONDS, wa 98020 6782.000-302.0006 BUNDY, VICTOR& MILDRED 200 JAMES ST., 9302 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0782.000.3a�•o003 ANGUS, .TUNE B. 200 JAMES ST., #305 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-306-0000 ELWAY,ROBERT 41804 264TH ST. EDMONDS, WA 08020 6782-000-402-0005 BRUNSVOLD, S. K. 200 JAMES ST„ #402 EDMONDS, WA, 08020 RAST, WILLIAM 200 JAMES ST., EDMONDS, WA ill CADE, BILLY & 200 JAMES ST., EDMONDS, WA RESIDENT 200 JAMES ST., EDMONDS, WA GREGERSON, 6 RSARA A. 200 JAMES ST„ #403 FAMONDST, W 8$011 O ~ Z 6782-000.4M0002 6782-000.406.0C WESTON, G. T. GRANT-ELWAY, 200 JAMES ST., 9403 200 JAMES Sr., EDMONDS, WA 96020 EDMONOS, WA 6782-000-408-0009 FARIS, KENNETH & SHIRLEY 200 JAMES ST., WS EDMONDS, WA 98020 7878-000-201-0003 TUCKER, RICHARD & DOROTHY 114 2ND AVE. S., #201 EDMONDS. WA 98020 7876-000-202-0002 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S., #202 EDMONDS, WA SM20 20146 25TH NW SEATTLE, WA 9 7876-000.201 3 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S. #201 EDMONDS, WA 802{ WAGNER, M. J( 114 2ND AVE. S EDMONDS, WA 0782-000-304.0004 DAVID PECK 200 JAMES ST., #304 EDMONDS, WA 96020 6782.000-3071-OOWOI STOKES, OEN LOREE 200 JAMES ST., 0307 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-401-0006 FARRELL, EVERETT' J. 200 JAMES ST., #401 EDMONDS, WA OW20 6782.000.404.0003 HAIVIMERSLA, WILLIAM D. 200 JAMES ST.. #404 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-407-0000 CAROL JOHNSON TRUST 200 JAMES ST,, #407 EDMONDS. WA 98020 7876-000-100.0005 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S., #100 EDMONDS, WA 98020 787UOO-202-00002 ERWERT, WILLIAM 114 2ND AVEN S., #202 EDMONDS. WA 98020 7678-000-203-0001 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S. #203 -. — - --�- ----- P. 4 ttttit 5-14"iS98 1:44PM DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 25S 3230 P.6 a841 800-iOQ 004i. 8Q�1-000.1C0.0 e941•ooal i l-00a9 TRANER SMITH ?. 00. NORTH AMSRt N MORT. CO. DICKI$DN. INSURANCE AGENCY 110 JA141SS ST. S7S 1Q6 :. ,110'JAMGS ST., TE i09 9'10 JAMES ST., STE I I I EDMONDS. WA;.�&8UZt� " _ EDMQNDS; WA 8020 EDMONDS WA 98020 z {!!. LU J to N Z Z W o:n o- WLU U. o �p Ly j 1f' .,« ..., ,,..r..�w,m,ncressx .a.>:,�..a. ne.•.rn«:o:o..�...; i 4`. a.'.+.....,...` � .,w:�...... '.....;:....�- f �._........,, X f r,. .#A� } i ,.._ 9-14-1998 1:44PM Fr rDAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 20S 2S9 32 0 P.5 • 1° 8139-000-001-0000 8139.000.002 Oi 3 013MOO-003-0004 GOODWIN, JOY BERGMANN, JO 4N & SUSAN TILTON, MICHAELICHIYOKO 102 3RD AVE. S., #A 162 3RD AVG. S. AM P,O. BOX 121397 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 FORT WORTH, TX 76121 8139-000-00UO04 6139-000-0044-00 3 813s•ooalal OOo5;8139 oAA-1A2.00Aa; `j OCCUPANT WIGGINS, JACK KAREN 8139.000 2(N-0004;8139-000-202.0003 Z (j 150 3RD AVE. S., #O 152 3RD AVE. S. ND RATELOO PROPERTIES CORP. . EDMONDS, WA 00020 EDMONDS, WA D8020 1266 MERCER ST. SEATTLE, WA 98109 cc � LU 3 Qj 8139-OMIOI.0005 $139-000-102.00 4 813"00.201-0004 p RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT tts , 150 3RD AVE. S., 4101 150 3RD AVE- S. #102 150 3RD AVE, S., #201 jF` EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 8020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0o1 813MOO-202-0003 8139 000-216 0 9 RESIDENT MEEK$, JOHN ETAL 160 3RD AVE. S., #202 15553 HENITZ A E. BE EDMONDS, WA 08020 MONROE, WA 272 8641.000-100.0007 8641-000-2M0006 DEWAR MEETKS & EKEM PC STAFFORD CRCIATIVE, INC. 110 JAMES ST„ STE 100 110 JAMES ST., TE 200 &o EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA za 8641.000-202.0004 8641-000-203-0003 FRANCIS KNIGHT CYNTHIA CHAM rO2O RLAIN 110 JAMES ST., STE 202 110 JAMES STL,E 203 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 8641-OOD-20&0001 8641-00D-300-0t HARRY & MARY NYHU IEFF GALBRAITI 110 JAMES ST., STE 205 110 JAMES ST., EDMONDS, WA 90020 EDMONDS, WA 8841-000-302-0003 W41-000-303.00P2 THOMAS 8 BETTY MAHAN VIRGINIA REDFI LD 110 JAMES ST., STE 302 110 JAMES ST., TE 303 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 8020 8641.000-100-0007 8041-000-101-0 6 MICHAEL MOSS, CPA SINGULARITY C RPOPj 110 JAMES ST„ STE 100 11 D JAMES ST.. TE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA $020 8641.000.103-0004 8$41-000-104-0 3 KMJ INTERNATION, INC. MILLERJRUSSE & ASSOC. 110 JAMES ST.. STE 103 110 JAMES ST., TE 104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 8020 8139-000-216-MM RESIDENT 150 3RD AVE. 8., #216 EDMONDS, WA 98020 $641.000-201.0005 KEN & STEFANIE HALVAS 110 JAMES ST., STE 201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000-204.0002 MEANG & DIANE NGE 110 JAMES ST., STE 204 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000-301-0004 TERRI SACCO 110 JAMES ST., STE 301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 WAl-000.304-0001 RESIDENT 110 JAMES ST. STE 304 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000-102-0006 THE HOTEL GROUP 110 JAMES ST., STE 102 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000-106-0002 AMERICAN EXPRESS FIN. ADV. 110 JAMES ST., STE 105 EDMONDS, WA 98020 P. 3 wr+ W THAT PORTION OF QUARTER OF SECTIO E SOUTHEAST , 23,TOWNSHIP UARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.. DESCRIBED AS . OLLOWS: 6EGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST STREETS IN THE CI CORNER ; OF EDMONDS; OF THIRD AND DAYTON THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF DISTANCE OF 263.88 £GINNING; TH FEET; THENCE CE N 1 18'22" N 88 41'22" A A DISTANCE OF 231.2� ' EET TO THE EASTERLY W, MARGIN OF SR-104. AS CONVE RECORDED UNDER AU TO THE STA ITOR'S FILE NUMBER OF WASHINGTON 6Y DEED 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CUR' 500.00 FEET AND FR TO THE LE M WHICH INTE HAVING A RADIUS OF SECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CUR SOUTHERLY ALONG SEARS S 7 52'59" F4 THENCE CONSUMING A CENTR ARC OF SAI ANGLE OF 91127'11 CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ; AN. ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO Ali MEASURED RADIALLY POINT 100 FEET �O THE L LINE, EASTERLY, AS OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; THEP 61.28 FEET TO'A Poo CE S 23 25'2 iT' OPPOSITE AND W, A DISTANCE OF LO FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEER S 1 STATION 204 68.17 P.`.; THENCE 09'15" W, 80 FEE!' L LINE, A DISTANCE 0 EASTERLY AN 106.83 FRET PARALLEL TO SAID TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS S A DISTANCE OF 2$.10 ATION 21+75; --EET. TO A POINT 1 THENCE S 44 26845" E, OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+ MEASURED AT RIGHT A •0 AND 30 FsEr 4GLES TO THE NORTHERLY, AS STREET: THENCE S 88 41'22" E, ALONG INTERLINE OF DAY -TON' THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON S -THE TRUE POINT OF S . EET. A DIST QINNING; CE OF 249.74 FEET TO EXCEPT THE EAST 30 ItET THEREOF OR ROAD; SITUATE IN 'HE COUN OF SNOHOMI STATE OF WASHINGTON tc r f �k ttfi s� Y r iy, �� .i 53 ! 1 �..�i� ,a{•:t t r,� .V �� ,. �'yf !Id i�� ° _ suv,. - 1 .. � ,.,..y,.....,.xc..4<^a.� .h3F5f*4.:ut3a" ....: �....-+�.ua:.wwwrina+vaeanRKUCat3a�++mWe'1+✓M+fNR„2fiY'2xdNflMMICltdlSlYltifi/1�i.9YyM kei wr�.n+,u�-......... 8-11-199S 4:41PM FROMDAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 259 3230 P.1 DA'V D 9VANS A ID ASSOCXATES, TELECQPY TR`ANSMIT'TAI. 77t&WiaRMarint i To: Diane FAX No: 771.0221 v;,w t)riw, sue. C 1'MONt= 771-0220 Ewa4 Waah&y M9&ot U 0 FIRM: CRY of Edmonds # OF PM L's: 3 JFROM: JIM Miller PRO.I.#: MNGR0001 Td 4252594099 to O oATe: August 11, 1995 REGARD o, Revised Applies on CUP a?-90 Fax: 425,2593230 w� COPIES:M#rk IIIICNAtlglatOn FAX NO: 778.0409 _ ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW: E3 REGULAR MAIL 01 PVERNIdHT MAIL i3 COURIER a NIA Z }=--r _ s Z ©� COMMANT8t LLI W` 2 �C Attached is the revised application form as you requ sted. I will be provi ing a revised mailing list before the end of v N the month.. Please contact ale with any other questi s or comments or qi iestions. Thank you. + a LU L,. of 21 LU Wi� 0 l p:1m{mflprt)D87tsppiwt.doc "' . 7e.t :."0 t �. � r S T } .4.. t�v 'd�' ✓ 3�j t � kF,^., 3 ;,, s l ,, >" f ,+ ( 4 a xi;5� �.'', ® - ajK' 1 }•E c. ��f :;{ 34f .Y J6 }�' s %' s .., •, : ' ; � s :.. "..o ;J+ v ..x' i....,.r�;. .•N, t'?✓-" 'k Y i e T�±i'3�C 11- E M ya L Date* July 13, 199 To J;Wb Chave', Planning hndger �- FromJeffrey , .S.t W&wn Mn Subject:; PROCESSING OFIDEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS LTHAT ,` WERE. ASSIGNED TO JOIIN BISSELIL I have attached three applications which were assigned to Bohn for reenew and processuig There hasbeen,nd action taken tm., -Your in on them: Processing th'6r,e-st, �df the, stA since I will be on vacation soon and i .will only it appears eg. �b.W. wo g�Zy days, a' week. John also left behind many.o,ther projects which have been distributedto. the; qng,wlthl," h many other new applications. From my brief review of each file, it doesnotappear thaI,-Comoleteness"letters were.issued, nor,:. . SIEPA processed f 7N- br File Nos. CU-98-58/ADB.98-70 or Abi-4 7' 98 -78.,� Please let me know if you have questions. Attachments 1. File Nos. CU-98-58/ADB-98-70, {Johnston A I oplic , atio - i i1b Way}care facility on Edmonds W 2. File Nos. ADB.98-77N-98-78:(Pii 6t,Edmonds' l-:'Application for new signs). 3. File Nos.. CU-97-1 l5/AD&-97-;J 16 (Sunrise, Development 1, Inc. A cation i', for senior care facility on:Da3" tied) PC: JW - Correspondence Notebook Shada Graham Paul Mar C. ftl Cnilxlan liarvtEa7t iDapartanant t IMulldMBS-Plantsl<ne-Snsinoartrin 1 a 1-stta Avanua Woprth s gind Ftoor tidsnondg, Wigs s6020 Plht9na"426) 771-0220 Fat X: 1426) 771-O221 Date Transmitted- Wo a f Pai (including cover pose.) Rectrilent's Fax 1W70 Faaatmlle Equipment: Automatial43roup it (2.2 mina.); Group ill. If there arm any prolotams Burins transnntsslon or cloauments am raoalved Ineomplota. plpwso oall (420) 771-0220 oneli ask far:_ THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT ** COUNT # 2 *** SEND *** ABOVE)(REDUCED SAMPLE NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 JIM MILLER 8-10-98 11:51AM 1 2 �e C1 of Edmonds Community Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 121-5th Avenue Worth ® 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA_98020 Phone: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 FAX.COVER To: �J^ From: Date Transmitted: o No: of Pages: Oncluding cover page.) Recipient's Fax No.: Z52 _ ►�i�i Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group 11(2,3 mins.); Group Ili. If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (425) 771-0220 and ask for: E Cl ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ❑ COMP PLAN AMENDMENT O CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ❑ HOME OCCUPATION ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT / STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER FILE # ZONE DATE REC'D BY FEE RECEIPT# HEARING DATE ❑ HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ APPEALED APPEAL# Phone Property Address or Location Property Owner Phone Address Address Tax Acc # Legal Description Details of Project or Proposed Use Phone Sec. Twp. Rng. The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attomey's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application. a DAVID'EVANS AND ASSOCIAT111. June 22, 1998 17111 West Marine View Drive, Saite C RECEIVED1998 Everett, Washington 982o, Mr.. John Bissell, Senior Planner J U N 2 3 Edmonds Community Development Tel: 425-254,4099 PLANNING DEPT- 13 5 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Fax: 425,2593230 SUBJECT: SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & ADB APPROVAL Dear John: In furtherance of our recent conversations, we are herewith formally requesting that the aforementioned application be reactivated and rescheduled for final ADB approval and public hearing on the conditional use permit before the Hearing Examiner. Consistent with our discussions, this application will be reactivated under the name of EFCA, LLC. as the applicant, with Mark McNaughton the applicant representative and with me as the contact person and consultant representative. As you are aware, Sunrise Development no longer has interest in the property or the application. The City files should be modified to reflect EFCA, LLC. as the applicant and remove references to Sunrise Development. Your assistance in scheduling this application for the next available ADB meeting would be greatly appreciated. The applicant realizes that the plans as currently submitted have a minor (four foot) projection over the allowable high limit. The McNaughton Group would stipulate that the plans would be revised to fall within the allowable height as a condition of ADB approval, with revised plans to be submitted prior to issuance of any construction permits for the project. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you again for your time, consideration and assistance in this matter. Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND AtSSOCIATES, INC. Y Miller lanning Consultant Enclosures c: Mark McNaughton, Bill Shields, Dave Sigl pAjn\mng00001\reacttr.1tr 8,9' SITIAIR LU Lu F L x r- z ua U O 0 w iL tJ.l U k= O z 6-22-1998 12:17PM FROM DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 269 3230 P.1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, Jane 22,1998 ��r vwn trains Vow rtrivn, Sails C Mr. John Bissell, Senior Manner �•M+l. 1C{nhiA ta. ya,o, Edmonds Community Development ,:,, ,• , 135 Fiala Avenue North Edmonds, WA 99020 SiJMCTi SUNWSE DEVELOPNOW CONDMONAL USE PERMT& ADD APPROVAL Dear John. In fu therancc of our recent conversations, %c are herewith formally requesting that the aforementioned application be reactivated and rescheduled for final ADD approval and publichearingon the conditional use permit before the Hearing Examiner. Consistent with our discussions, this application will be reactivated under the name of EFCA, LLC, as the applicant, with Mark MoNaughton the applicant representative and with me as the contact person and consultant representative. As you are aware, Sunrise Development no longer has interest in the property or the application. The City files should be modified to refloct EFCA, LLC. as the applicant and remove references to Sunrise Development, Your assistance in scheduling this application for the next available ADS meeting would be greatly appreciated. The applicant realizes that the plans as currently submitted have a minor (four foot) projection over the allowable high limit. The McNaughton Group would stipulate that the plans would he revised to fall within the allowable height as a condition of ADS approval, with revised plans to be submitted prior to issuance of any. construction permits for the project. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you again for your time, consideration and assistance in this matter. Sincerely, D YID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. JMiller lan W Consultant Enclosures o: Mark McNaughton, Bill Shields, Dave Sigl �rrrrrr r DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, January 8, 1998 1716 West Marine t0 View Drive, Suite C Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner JAI tV�`o Edmonds Community Development '4� °` Everett, Washington ggzax 135 Fifth Avenue North ��` Tel: 425.259,4099 Edmonds; WA 98020 Fax: 425-259,3230 SUBJECT: SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & ADB APPROVAL DearJohn: In December of last year I wrote you on behalf of the applicant and our client, Sunrise Development, Inc., that we wished to withdraw the aforementioned applications. As you and I discussed shortly after my having sent you that, letter, negotiations again began between the applicant and land owner regarding purchase of the property. As we discussed by telephone, Sunrise desires to keep these two application open with processing suspended until such time and the negotiations for purchase of the property are concluded. I will again contact" you in writing when those negotiations have concluded to request rescheduling of these applications. Your time, assistance, patience and understanding in this matter are greatly appreciated. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions at any time. Sincerely: DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Jim Miller Land Planning Consultant JGM e: William Shields; Dave Sigl & Mark McNaughton d:\winword\template\snrswith.doe k { BMBRk .y ?' SITIAIR �; 5 c y �� 44k f \f }�� w t � t �. d� n� r^�J. f7+ r{s�"''��,5 t7 'iC G?{��Si,, ��l�t�.% 1'si+�s7��U`�+ny� t; 4'(�ys�, .,,,~ t. �,�. `$.,� � ,y�.;'. X.(Fbt�{.<� t .fit:-,� t i _,-t i Y";. • �� s i r }i?< a 7f +'''';. ,`�"�r. a-,-�°'�5.,�.r��. �( .,.�;��: �r��Yts"�.k :,..i, f��t��Yry L4e crr �-� _FY(� Z7s „EsUrzi�t r ... Wk• i. §s' t r 7 e� - DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES,d�� December 10,1997 1716 West Marine View Drive, Suite C Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner a!' y+ Everett, Washington 982oi vO; Edmonds Community Development v pj 135 Fifth Avenue North PY 1 7 �� Teh 42S-2S9,4099 U) LuEdmonds, WA 98020 tu,} J #S— is Pr. Fax: 42S.a59.3x3o th 1E SUBJECT: SUNRISE DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT arc ADB APPROVAL uU Dear John: aOn behalf of the applicant and my client, Sunrise Development, Inc., I am hereby formally withdrawing the applications for Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Board approval -of the 81 unit senior assisted zt�-� housing project on the northwest corner of 2nd and Dayton in the City of Edmonds. The considerations iA; necessitating withdrawal involve the financial feasibility of the project. We on the consulting team and the � Lu, applicant thank you for all your assistance, cooperation, direction and consideration in processing the applications to this point. Sunrise hopes to find another appropriate location in the area and will again look forward to O vy working with the City when that opportunity materializes. Should any refunds of fees be applicable, they should p be forwarded to Mr. David Sigl at DGS Development Corporation, 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, WA W u t 98101. Thank you again for your invaluable assistance. H- LL 0 Sincerely, 1 x DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. °z m M� Land Planning Consultant 1 JGM 7— c: William Shields, Dave Sigl & Mark McNaughton i dAwinword\template\snrswith.doc © ... si'rtAla WT .,0Nl ,34'sF *`Q p1Wt$s'` r 7` :.�s' a s t t0 g9i tagn Ya " y { a. s ..�: .,., ,..# ir.? .l,,ns, :: �'-...... Y�1 M1?ti .,'l".'7?tY7tx'. Y ��er. �t .i�y M1i)F�Ss`�,;rs`:i .t...� T tIJ IN t T F Washington state, Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206} 440-4000 November•18, 1997 Mr. Jeffrey S. Wilson,,s.•" ' Supervisor City of Edmonds Dept. of 9 19.97 Community Services �r,g�ct:rti t,,e 250-5th Avenue North -,+i: .Edmonds, WA_ 98020 SR-104 M.P.24`.68 Vic. C.S.3130 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Application For A Conditional Use Permit.For Sunrise Development,. Inc.. City File No. 'CU-97-115/ADB-97- 116 Dear, Mr. Wilson, The applicant seeks,approval to construct "a- new, -81 bed., assisted elderly care facility"with 65-parking stalls. The location of this proposed development is in the northeast quadrant of the SR-104/Dayton Street intersection. our comments'on'the MDNS for this application are as follows. We concur with the city's .condition requiring the applicant to..contribute a traffic mitigation fee toward improving the SFt-104 (Sunset Avenue)/Dayton Street intersection to mitigate this development's traffic impacts. However, what improvement is planned to the SR-104 (Sunset Avenue)/Dayton Street intersection? Since.this intersection is part of a state highway and partially within limited access, WSDOT has jurisdiction over approving any channelization*revisions and roadway.,surfacing work. We will need.to review and approve any channelization revisions and/or roadway surfacing work at this state highway intersection. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our comments on -the MDNS for this application. Should you have any questions, please feel freetocontact Don Hurter (440-4664) or Ed Giraud (440-4912) of my Developer Services section. S' r T BET H$ON _ P,. E Manager f Planning &" Local Coordination ELG:elg „ ra Administrative Offices Jeffrey S. Wilson 1133 184th St. SW Planning Supervisor Suite 200 Department of Community Services Lynnwood, WA City of Edmonds 98037-8121 250 5"t' Avenue North (425) 348-7100 Edmonds, WA 98020 Fax 348-2319 Executive Director Joyce F. Olson December 1, 1997 Re: Assisted Care Facility (CU 97-1151ADB-97-116) Dear Mr. Wilson: Community Transit L 17 err" DEC 2 F.t�t4e�Gttti`'..4 �ivr�`•ir. Thank you for the opportunity to provide transit related input to the planning process for the project noted above. CT offers numerous service routes along Dayton Street which stop adjacent to the proposed building site. Metro also offers service with Route 317. An existing bus stop is located midblock on the north side of Dayton Street between 2nd Avenue South and SR 104. This stop should be abandoned and a new stop constructed approximately 80 feet west of the intersection of Dayton Street and 21 Avenue South, on the north side of Dayton Street Please require the developer to construct a cement passenger waiting pad in conjunction with required frontage improvements and landscaping. The pad should be 5 feet in width and 15 feet in length, and be adjacent to the back side of the sidewalk. I have enclosed a cross cut diagram of a typical pad for their convenience. Also, parking should be prohibited for 20 feet on either end of the bus zone (60 feet in length). The exact location of the bus stop pad can be modified if necessary to better fit any proposed landscaping and traffic signage, etc. CT will relocate the existing bus stop flag to a more convenient temporary location when construction begins if requested by the developer. CT will also place a ne ., flag and sitting bench at the new bus stop location when it is complete. I look forward to working with the City of Edmonds in completing the modification of this important transit facility. Please notify CT of the status of this request following final determination. Sincerely, Brent L. Russell Transit System Planner (425) 348-7189 Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation -F ti ..,i 1 ,w, ��Sr f�rc sl Sikf; � , h }"'•t� ,�, Bus'Stop Shelter Pad Slope, finished gads cf t pavement to diain at A Match fi" conc-Qte 5/ad3acant z i1 Sn;;Fied sm)(k " -� Excavate and recompact to 4" af.5t8 minus cnahad rock : 95�i max d dry ensity scab -base d',O ; , UA !s- Compacted sub -base (1) LL LU d� C. Typi concretrx siteitr pad fawf 97 uJ h 'h; LL.. _ul y iE 1 Expansion joints eq l aj& spaced" r t tilt r 1 Vi, i t f Vir Board Chairman Young cautioned the applicant that if the proposed sign design is pursued, they should work with staff to identify what steps would be required to have a sign of that size. John Bissell clarified that a variance would be required if it was over the allowable sign area. Boardmember Rubenkonig stated that the Code advises the applicant to coordinate design among neighbors and questioned who the applicant should consider neighbors in determining the building design. —' 1' John Bissell pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan generally encourages coordination, however, it wO does not define specific neighbors. Codes and existing policies of the City should make it easy for the 2 �: I applicant to accomplish this, however, in this case, many of the buildings in the area are older and not in gti LL Ikeeping with present-day design concepts. Cn Boardmember Chalupnik asked if there is any proposed use of the property to the south of the site, which tom• j' is also owned by the applicant. � Oti L1J LUt Ted Litzenberger indicated that there are no known plans for the property, however, there is currently a fast-food establishment operating on that site and the access between the two properties serves this v cn business. o t_- w W xU There were no audience comments on this proposal. U. . ol Boardmember Oaklief expressed concern that the south elevation of the building is long and unbroken ui� and with the signage and store fronts, creates repetition. He suggested more modulation on this elevation ras well as some additional perimeter landscaping. Mr. Oaklief indicated that with additional modulation o z in the elevation, using a solid color on the structure would be acceptable. Boardmember Rubenkonig requested that when the application appears before the Board for final approval, that the applicant be prepared to comment on the reason for northbound traffic having more visibility than southbound traffic. She would also like the applicant to consider Olympic Finance as being a structure which meets the City's guidelines for Highway 99, when Iooking at neighborhood J design elements. Board Chairman Young suggested another color scheme which might create a softer, less harsh appearance, and encouraged good communication with neighboring businesses about the appropriateness O of designs. 4 � 1 PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF A NEW 81-BED ASSISTED LIVING ELDERLY CARE FACILITY Sunrise Development, Inc. 141 Dayton Street Jerry McDevitt, Senior Associate, and Scott Boyer, Design Manager, Dieterich Mithun, 414 Olive Way, Suite 500, Seattle, David Segal, Sunrise Development, Inc., 1420 5th Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, and Jim Miller, David Evans & Associates, 1716 W. Marine View Drive, Everett, the applicant's representatives, were present. John Bissell presented the staff report and explained that this is a proposal for a new 81-bed elderly care facility which will provide on -site staff and a common dining room. The property is located in.the BC Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 9 November 5,1997 Ji zone which allows this use with a conditional Use Permit. The proposal requires a SEPA review and the Environmental Checklist has been submitted and is being reviewed by the City. Mr. Bissell stated that the applicant is proposing one large building on a lot within a zero lot line setback area. The building will have hip and gable end roofs, dormers and building modulation, a dark brown asphalt shingle roof and light tan stucco siding. The proposal shows that portions of the building will be medium brown wood and have putty colored concrete sections as well. The building is "U" shaped, v creating a large courtyard on the western side, with landscape, entry and garage lighting planned. A sign a is planned but no specific details have been included in this preliminary review. He pointed out that a _W substantial amount of landscaping is planned for the perimeter of the building and in the east and west F i side courtyards. O John Bissell explained that the main pedestrian entrance and vehicle drop off point will be placed at the mid -point of the lot on 2nd Avenue West. The main parking area will be located under the building with the primary access from Dayton Street. The underground garage has additional access from the existing access easement located on the north side of the property. l- 0! O Jerry McDevitt explained that this is an assisted living facility for seniors over 65 years of age, and a Z series of common areas on the main floor for dining and recreation are planned. Residents will be W ill; g encouraged to come out into the common areas from their individual rooms, which will be 400 to 600 square feet. The outside courtyards will be designed to encourage residents' use as well. He stated that aalthough setbacks are not required they have been added to allow for additional landscaping. The main „ J w entrances at the corners will also be pulled back to allow for a reduction in building mass as well as a r 0. feature garden and signage. u. O Z'. Mr. McDevitt pointed out that projecting bay windows with dormers are planned to increase modulation. x He indicated that the proposed roofing is a 30-year architectural shingle, but would like clarification as to p whether different roofing materials can be used for select areas, such as a metal roof at the corners and Z courtyards, to create interest and modulation. Curb cuts and vehicle accesses have been limited as much as possible. All living units will be air conditioned, however, none of the mechanical elements will project higher than the roof. Boardmember Chalupnik complimented the applicant on proposing a useful addition to the community. He pointed out that his only concern is the height variance. Jerry McDevitt commented that there may not be a need for a height variance and only inquired about flexibility of the architectural features for the roof for information purposes. Boardmember Oaklief asked if the mature heights on the planting materials has been identified for the south side of the building. Mr. McDevitt stated that sycamores, red maples, red oaks, flowering purple ash and sweetgums will all be used to eventually create an overhead tree canopy and make the building appear more residential in nature. i9 Boardmember Rubenkonig complimented the applicant on this proposal that establishes a business which also incorporates residential elements. She commented that the design appears to have been done with the existing neighborhood in mind. Ms. Rubenkonig asked about how the mobility of the patients in the Alzheimer's unit will be safeguarded. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 10 November 5,1997 R Jerry McDevitt explained those design decisions which were based upon the neighborhood in which it will be located as well as the basic theme of downtown Edmonds. He also stated that on the first floor, the common areas will be for the use of the assisted living residents. There are security doors which separate the common areas from the Alzheimer's care portion of the building, which has its own common areas and outdoor terrace, and is designed so as not to be a destination for other residents and visitors. There were no audience comments on this proposal. John Bissell pointed out that the Code does not discuss architectural features protruding into the height limit, except for elevator penthouses, chimneys, and vent pipes. Therefore, it appears that the variance process would be the only avenue to grant an allowance of extra height. Mr. Bissell commented that the applicant may have more flexibility in the roof design because the Code has recently been modified to eliminate the requirement for a 4:12 pitch, and now requires that the roof design be approved by the Architectural Design Board. Dave Sigel suggested that there may be a design which utilizes a more traditional chimney feature and would reduce the roof height. Board Chairman Young encouraged good communication with neighbors when finalizing the design of the project. Boardmember Oaklief asked if there have been other variances granted for roof heights. John Bissell commented that variances have been granted for roof heights, primarily for residential structures which have certain difficult site constraints. He also explained that when the project comes before the Board for final review, the ADB will be making a recommendation for the Hearing Examiner to consider when the conditional Use Permit application is heard. That Board recommendation could include a suggestion to allow a variance for additional roof height if that was applied for by the applicant. Boardmember Oaklief commented that the south elevation is somewhat repetitious and would benefit from the Iandscaping for mitigation. Jerry McDevitt pointed out that the reason for using the different stucco surface was to break up the siding into two zones, and the lighter color will unify the facade along its length. Having the courtyard face west and pulling the length back from the corner, prevents a long facade from facing the traffic. Board Chairman Young complimented the applicant for presenting such detailed information for the Board's review. 7. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS APPROVED BY STAFF WITHOUT ADB APPROVAL John Bissell reported that a new wall -mounted sign was approved at the Pizza Port, located at 184 Sunset Avenue. The sign and sign band is illuminated and is a replacement for an identical sign which the previous tenant had in the same location. Mr. Bissell also explained that new painted wood and vinyl window signs, below the allowable square footage, were approved for the Arista Wine Cellars, located at 107 5th Avenue South. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page I I November 5,1997 W x 8. BOARD DISCUSSION Boardmember Oaklief asked for clarification regarding the Code amendment which. eliminated the requirement to include 4:12 pitch roofs on buildings. John Bissell explained that the Code was amended and now includes language which states that a modulated roof, approved by the Architectural Design Board, can be included. He also clarified the reasons the Code amendments were made. Boardmember Chalupnik discussed the issue of small neon signs in the downtown area and stated that he wanted to send a message to applicants that neon signs are not always. appropriate. He explained that Quintana Roo restaurant is an example of poor sign use and garish colors in the downtown area. New cloth signs have been added at that facility as well. John Bissell stated that complaints about this restaurant have been received by the City and will be reviewed. Boardmember Rubenkonig commented that she has no problem with small touches of neon signage in the downtown pedestrian areas to draw interest to a business, but is opposed to large neon signs. John Bissell pointed out that amendments to the Design Guidelines will probably be considered in .1998 ? and then adopted as an element of the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Codes which are in compliance with elements of the Comprehensive Plan will then be adopted. He encouraged Board discussion on design issues which could be included in this process, and recommended that the Board draft language to be included in the Design Guidelines and the Sign Code amendments. Board Chairman Young commented that it is very helpful for the Board when applicants proposing neon signs have a sign professional available for questions. He asked if the guidelines could include language which suggested this as a requirement. John Bissell stated that this language is possible, however, making it a requirement is difficult because there is no method of determining accreditation of the sign professional. For house designs in certain areas of the City, the Code contains language which requires the use of design professionals who are licensed by the state. Board Chairman Young requested an update on the Port of Edmonds boat storage facility and on Corry's Fine Dry Cleaning sign application, John Bissell stated that he will have more information on the Port of Edmonds proposed boat shorage facility within the next week and will make a report to the Board. He explained that Corry's Fine Dry Cleaning will be re -submitting their application for signage at the next ADB meeting, scheduled for November 19, 1997. 9. ADJOURN BOARDMEMBER CHALUPNIK MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. Architecttual Design Board Meeting Page 12 November 5, t997 12-10-1997 11:39AM FROM DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 2S9 3230 P.1 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, December 10, 1997 rr,6 men Horror t+kw Drin SWIS C Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner Edmonds Community Development ew^, w ,nroo spa 135 Fifth Avenue North r.,r 03-U9.409g Edmonds. WA 99020 Farr 4tsasg.�i�• SUMCT: SIUNME I)EVE1LOPMNT CONDMONAia USE pFjM TT & ADD APPROVAI, Dear John: On behalf of the applicant and my client, Sundse Development, Tw,, I am hereby formally withdrawing the applications for Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Board approval of the 81 unit senior assisted 'housing project on the northwest corner of 2ad and Dayton in the City of Edmonds. The considerations necessitating withdrawal involve the financial feasibility of the project. We on the consulting team and the applicant thank you for all your assistance. cooperation, direction and consideration in processing the applications to this point. Sunrise hopes to find another appropriate Iocation in the area and will again look forward to working with the City when that opportunity materializes. Should any refunds of feces he applicable, they should be forwarded to Mr. David Sigl at DGS Development Corporation, 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200, Seattle, WA 98101. Thank you again for your invaluable assistance. Sincerely, DAVRI EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 • Land planning Consultant JGM c: William Shields, Dave Sigl & Mark MoNaughton dAwinwordltsmp1**\snrswith.doo SENT BY CORPORATE OFFICE ;12- 1 �J Administrative Offices Wilson 11331S4th St SW Mill'hir4- Supervisor -97 ; 3:39PM COMMUNITY TRANSIT-4 CITY OF Post -it• Fax Note 7671 jDate ► ' Yb • Rne Rh acu [Ph'!eOM& of Phone tLe%O Suite 200 Department of Community Services Lynnwood, WA City of Edmonds 98037-8121 250 S° Avenue North (425) 348-7100 )Edmonds, WA 98020 Fax 348-2319 Executive Director Joyce F. Olson December 1 1997 Re. Assisted +Care Fae ty (CU-97-115/ADW97--116) Dear Mr. Wilson: EDMONDS;# 1/ 2 EMMM -Immunity Transit Thank you for the opportunity to provide transit related input to the planting process for the project noted above. CT oflf'en numerous service routes along Dayton Street which stop adjacent to the proposed building site. Metro also offers service with Route 317. An existing bus stop is located midblock on the north side ofDayton Street between V Avenue South and SR 104. This stop should be abandoned and a new stop constructed approximately 80 fast west ofthe intersection ofDayton Street and 210 Avenue South, on the north side ofDayton Strout Please require the developer to construct a cement passenger waiting pad in conjunction with required frontage improvernettts and landscaping. The pad should be 5 feet in width and 15 feet in length, and be adjacent to the back side of the sidewalk I have enclosed 4 cross out diagram of a typical pad for their convenience, Also, parking should be prohibited for 20 feet on either end ofthe bus zone (60 feet in length). The exact location ofthe bus stop pad can be modified if necessary to better fit any proposed landscaping and traffic signage, etc. CT will relocate the existing bus stop flag to a more convenient temporary location when construction begins if requested by the developer. CT will also place a new tag and sitting bench at the new bus stop location when it is complete. 1 look forward to working with the City of Edmonds in completing the modification ofthis important transit facility. Please notify CT of the status of this request following fatal determination Siaeerely, Brent L. Russell Transit System. Planner (425) 348-7189 Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation Suite 200 Department of Community Services Lynnwood, WA City of Edmonds 98037-8121 250 S° Avenue North (425) 348-7100 )Edmonds, WA 98020 Fax 348-2319 Executive Director Joyce F. Olson December 1 1997 Re. Assisted +Care Fae ty (CU-97-115/ADW97--116) Dear Mr. Wilson: EDMONDS;# 1/ 2 EMMM -Immunity Transit Thank you for the opportunity to provide transit related input to the planting process for the project noted above. CT oflf'en numerous service routes along Dayton Street which stop adjacent to the proposed building site. Metro also offers service with Route 317. An existing bus stop is located midblock on the north side ofDayton Street between V Avenue South and SR 104. This stop should be abandoned and a new stop constructed approximately 80 fast west ofthe intersection ofDayton Street and 210 Avenue South, on the north side ofDayton Strout Please require the developer to construct a cement passenger waiting pad in conjunction with required frontage improvernettts and landscaping. The pad should be 5 feet in width and 15 feet in length, and be adjacent to the back side of the sidewalk I have enclosed 4 cross out diagram of a typical pad for their convenience, Also, parking should be prohibited for 20 feet on either end ofthe bus zone (60 feet in length). The exact location ofthe bus stop pad can be modified if necessary to better fit any proposed landscaping and traffic signage, etc. CT will relocate the existing bus stop flag to a more convenient temporary location when construction begins if requested by the developer. CT will also place a new tag and sitting bench at the new bus stop location when it is complete. 1 look forward to working with the City of Edmonds in completing the modification ofthis important transit facility. Please notify CT of the status of this request following fatal determination Siaeerely, Brent L. Russell Transit System. Planner (425) 348-7189 Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation SENT MCORPORATE OFFICE ;12- 1-97 ; 3:46PM ; COl�1NUNITY: fiRANS1�'- ^ CITY OF EDM4NDS;# 2/ 2 11. 5 4 Bixi Stop She Pad a _ Sbpa ttntshad Shad¢ of Petvement to, dram ai2°b cctmto � ts� =a Z 4 4" of r8 e: ncs emrhad rocki=e aba msci eacampmct La u 95% max chi datie�r sub�raa W : CD d sL&yase LU cn. E { mnc�aa SEmlist od 77 W W W i ti,. LL1.... 1-- x Z ! t it - "�`� 13p3C4d 5� S ! OF ` _t, ^�, �1. 3 C s. r�vz r4f�� M•��1� Y �!4 ` r ��4 S�r*ry z�th - .,. -f yb K S d � ,,..wraw �• �mKwsucan .}�' �F?P t. '.< i',;i'-4 '} � t * i � t 7'yy �a„4 i.4�w+.row+� .��ew eblAtitiYCix�sr�ror�aJrnnwrnrr,i,..�. eww,:k.ups..1.xl'Tc.�iwu2liiYS5'1V:+YiiM1i,+'"➢tEY84"4f.IkM.'MtM .1 r?, Y 7. S..0 I . jack Wiggins .f Construction Co., Inc. Commercial & Residential, Contractor JACKWC*240BB (WASH) November 25,1997 v—'0 � City of Edmonds J Dept. of Community Services Planning Division 121 5th Avenue North F, Edmonds, Wa. 98020 — 0� LU W ' Hand Delivered and Faxed to: Jeffrey S. Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor a - Re: RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) LUCity of Edmonds File No. CU-97-115/A.DB-97-116 LL a 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Washington 98020 z v Subject: Comments to above referenced DNS w 0 z Gentlemen: We wish to inform you of our parking easement recorded under Snohomish County Recording Number 9704110061, Volume 3295, Page 0317. This recorded agreement grants to our building at 130 2nd Avenue South; 36 parking spaces. Currently 24 of those 36 parking spaces are located at 141 Dayton and will be impacted by the proposed assisted living facility. Our parking spaces must be made . part of their permitting process. Sincerely, WIGGINS PROPERTIES, LLC Karen M. Wiggins, Vice President 152 3rd Ave. South, Suite= • Edmonds, WA 98020 + kuM 776-1143 FAX NO. ]t�.774-3336 102A 425 425 q d 41 y} M 4 .A 40C. CITY Y OF EENCI DS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 •.(425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation �_ Engineering + Wastewater Treatment Plant MEMORANDUM DATE: November 26, 1997 TO: Architectural Design Board Applicants FROM: John Bissell, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Architectural Design Board Agenda and Staff Report Your application been scheduled for the December 3, 1997 Architectural Design Board (ADB) Meeting, Enclosed are an agenda and staff report for the ADB meeting. Please find your item on the agenda. A representative must be present for each item, including the Consent agenda. The Board often moves items off the Consent agenda and onto the regular agenda. If a representative is not present, the Board will not act on the item. Please note the statement at the top of the agenda. You must obtain sign ADB is not a substitute for review of building permits, and an approval by the ADB does not grant construction approval. Please carefully read the staff report pertaining to your item. If you find any errors, missing information or if you have any questions, please call me at 771- 0220 before the meeting. It is important that items going to the Board be as complete and clear as possible in order to avoid confusion during the meeting. If the Board does not understand your project, they may not approve it. z w 2 D ca a I LL 0 z LOP] % "EDMO DIESIGIV'�30ARii AG NDA. �NEIDNESDAX; L' ZA' T LIB RY, YLA MEETINGROOM[.� RA JJI 650: MAIN, STREET �DMQ�MS �WA DIM k ease note; 4or a, must 146' present it'rnee Signand ,buildingpen*Its must obtainedt- a e buil ngdivision ad tiontoappr al ov of the, Project hy. 06 Architectu ral Design B ROLL CALL 2'. PONDENCE/COMWNTS FROM STAFF 3 ARCHITECT URAL DESIGN BOARD COMMENTS 4. "PROVE. NIBIMS FROM NOVEMBERS 1997 5. APPROVEMINUTES FROG NOVEYWER 19 4914T CONSENT AGENDA None 5 7. -AGENDA- YINALrPRPY4 REQUESTED. CU!-97-115 PUBLIC MEETING CONSIDER A REC "NDATIONTO THEHEARING.�,, EXAMINER FOR A CONDITIONAL :USE PERMIT To ALLOW A+NEW_ RETIRE_MENT2 ASSISTED LIVING AND 'CONVALESCENT -FACILITY Sunrise Development, Inc. ..141'Dayton PRELUM NARY REVIEW None S. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS APPROVED OUT AL BY STAFF -WITH' ADB�'"PROV • 9. BOARD DISCUSSION 147� LU u_ 2 ur a L 0 a LU U. ui ca H- Z ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD STAFF REPORT November 26,1997 ADB-97-116 PUBLIC MEETING TO CONSIDER A RECQMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXANM*4ER FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A NEW RETIREMENT ASSISTED LIVING AND CONVALESCENT FACILITY I. Applicant/Property Owner Architect/Representative Sunrise Development Inc. Jim Miller 1420 5th Ave, STE 2200 David Evans & Assoc. Seattle, WA 98101 1716 W Marine View Drive Everett, WA 98201 H. Site Location: 141 Dayton Street. III. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to develop a new 81 bed elderly care facility in the BC zone district. The facility will provide on site staff and a common dining room. This proposal appeared before the ADB for a preliminary review on November 5, 1997. At that time the ADB expressed a favorable review, with the only concerns being a possibly of two much repetition on the south elevation, and the staff comment that a portion of the building was found to be over the allowable height limit. The applicant has modified the height of the building without substantially altering the design. The applicant has also stated that the combination of siding materials used on the south elevation will mitigate the impact of repetition on the south elevation of the building. Therefore, no change was made to the south building facade. IV. Background: A. Zoning: The property is zoned Community Business (BC). The BC zone allows the proposed use with a Conditional Use Permit. B. Environmental Review:The proposal requires a SEPA review. The applicant has submitted an Environmental Checklist. The City has issued a mitigated determination of nonsignifigance with a required monetary mitigation for traffic impacts. C. Issues: Design of the site, and landscaping have all been addressed by the applicant in their proposal, and the Architectural Design Board must determine the appropriateness of the proposal. i ADB-97.116 { V. -Staff Analysis: A. Building Design: The applicant has proposed one large building with hip and gable end roofs, dormers and building modulation. The building is "U" shaped, creating a large courtyard on the western side of the building. These elements of the building appear to create a consistent theme as required by ECDC section 20.10.070 (see Attachment 2). 1. Materials: The elevations in the architectural plans indicate lapped siding such as wood or L.P. type siding, and stucco siding for the body of the building. The applicant has proposed an asphalt shingle roof. The applicant has not stated the grade of the roofing material. These issues must be resolved prior to final approval by the ADB. 2. Lighting: The applicant has not provided specific details as to the type or amount of lighting. However the lighting plan indicates some landscape lighting, entry lighting, and garage lighting. The information provided in the SEPA checklist indicates that the garage and entry points to the building will be lighted in a manner consistent with other multiple family developments in the area. 3. Colors: Dark brown is proposed for the roof while the body uses light tan for the stucco portions, medium brown for the wood portions, and puddy for the concrete portions. 4. Signing: The applicant indicates a sign on the sign and lighting plan. However, no specific details of the sign have been shown. The applicant must provide sign details prior to final approval of the sign. B. Site Design: 1. Access I Parking: The applicant has proposed a main pedestrian entrance and vehicle drop off point at the mid -point of the lot on 2nd Avenue West. The main parking area will be located under the building with the primary access from Dayton Street. The underground garage has additional access from the existing access easement located on the north side of the property (see Attachment 2). 2. Landscaping: The BC zone, where this proposal is situated, allows the building to cover 100% of the site. However, the applicant has proposed to set the building back as much as 20 feet from the property line, in some places. With these setbacks, the applicant is able to provide a much larger amount of landscaping than would typically be found in the downtown area (see Attachment 2). �. N ®N u F4 t ADB-97-116 C. Technical Review: 1. Engineering Division • A site plan that has been stamped by a Professional Engineer will be required to be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. • Parking plan will be required to meet the requirements of the ECDC. • The project must comply with storm water quality and quantity requirements per Ordinance 3013. Drains in underground parking garages are to be routed to the sanitary sewer system. • Provisions for power transformer to provide power for elevator must be made. Pole mounted transformers are not allowed. • Civil Engineered Drawings must match the architectural drawings. 2. Building Division • Compliance with the ADA requirements must be met. • Civil Engineered drawings must match the architectural drawings. VI. Compliance with criteria: In order for the ADB to approve this item, the Board must make the following findings: A. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies. B. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance, or the city has approved a variance or a modification under the zoning ordinance. The following table is an analysis of the bulk standard requirements of the zoning ordinance: C. Building Height 25' + 5 for a modulated roof 25' + 5 for a modulated roof Lot Coverage 100% less than 100% Setbacks 0' foot street 0' foot street 0' sides 0' sides 0' rear 0' rear Parking Stalls 27 for the proposed use + 24 65 dedicated to nearby uses = 51 required. Note: at the preliminary review the applicant proposed a building height which exceeded the allowed height by 3 feet. The applicant has modified the design to conform to the required height limit. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes ECDC section 20.10.070 - ADB Criteria and ECDC section 20.12 - Landscaping. ECDC 20.10.070 states that all elements of building design should form an integrated development, harmonious in scale, line and mass. Building elements include all exterior elements and colors. .0 AD8.97-1f6` � VII. ` `Recommendation: Staff believes that the AD can find that the proposal is 'consistent with the criteria for ` approval as. listed above. Therefore, 'Staff recbinmends that: the,'ADB', recommend ; approval to the Hearing Examiner. tom- LU a"yc> Attachments: W ray ; `. Q, o fn L ` Vicinity Map 2 Applicant's drawings cn:0 °� tea. U. o " ,. Uj:LU r W � uj t9 z y 5 1 K > C � 3 (` a....rt .uva x�+.Jb..�Y1v.Mn........�...n ru4nw+.uw.. t = S ;—.uu.u«.r...•x.w•w�Y.b, ch`e+w.cesYwu 5. AGENDA FINAL APPROVAL REQUESTED: ADB-97-136 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL CABINET SIGN Corry's Fine Dry Cleaning 102 3rd Avenue No. OF A NEW INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED Corry Baker, 16305 35th NE, Lake Forest Park, the applicant, as well as Mark Hawksworth and Russell Svardal, Northwest Sign and Design, 815 8th Street, Kirkland, the applicant's representatives, were present. John Bissell presented the staff report and explained that this proposal for two new internally -illuminated signs for an existing building is being resubmitted after being previously denied at the October 1, 1997 ADB meeting. The proposal has been modified by changing the color of the awning to match the color of the sign, and by adding screening around the back of the sign to hide the mounting hardware. Red letters on a green background will be used for these metal -framed, plastic -faced cabinet signs with exposed neon lighting. 3 Eli Mr. Bissell stated that one sign will be located on the east side of the building on the sloped parapet wall. Up The other sign will be placed on the wall on the north side of the building. Total sign area will be 60.5 t' square feet where 62.8 square feet is allowed and the height will be 12.6 feet where 14 feet is allowed. a_ Oj John Bissell pointed out that staff is concerned that the changes made to the sign application may not Z? address the concerns of the Board as reflected in their motion for denial made at their meeting on v October 1, 1997, and therefore, is not making a recommendation on this proposal. OX Z Mark Hawksworth presented photographs which showed the green building color and matching raceway. The only portion of the sign which will be visible will be individual channel letters, and the side of the sign will be enclosed and be a part of the fascia. He showed samples of 30 milliamp transformered neon to illustrate the brilliance of the red letters. Boardmember Chalupnik asked for clarification on the brightness of the neon samples. Mark Hawksworth stated that the two samples shown are different types of red with the Clear Red tube being the one proposed. i D Boardmember Rubenkonig asked the applicant to explain why this approach to signage is appropriate for the downtown area and how it fits into this City's neighborhood. u Cony Baker commented that this sign design was created to best utilize the existing roof of the building and indicated that his Lake City location has the same building and sign design. Mark Hawksworth pointed out that both the green awning and the sign height are appropriate for the downtown area. The individual channel neon letters are commonly used and are similar to other signs in commercial strip centers. Boardmember Rubenkonig commented that downtown Edmonds is not a commercial strip center. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page t November 19, 1997 U Fr ?'�d� X° -�'az``3t.,'1 Boardmember Pierce asked about the importance of neon versus other types .of illumination, primarily due to concerns about the brilliance factor and possible view impacts. Mr. Hawksworth stated that shepherd -type lighting might be an alternative, however, the illumination factor would be greater than the less intense individual neon letters. Boardmember Oaklief asked about the construction of the sign. He also asked for clarification on the name of the neon tubing which will be used and where that particular red falls within the brightness spectrum. Mark Hawksworth explained that the sign construction is aluminum with open single tube neon letters. The background houses the electrical components which connect the letters. He stated that Clear Red is the trade name of the neon to be used, and after showing samples of other reds for comparison, commented that Clear Red is in about the middle of the brightness spectrum. Cony Baker also pointed out that with the background being green, the neon will be more diffused Boardmember Chalupnik asked about the brilliance on the signage they have used at other Iocations. Mr. Hawksworth explained that the illumination on a sign which had a back -lit awning with indirect lighting could be more or less intense, depending on the projection of the awning, which dictates the distance from light fixtures. Boardmember Chalupnik pointed out that backlighting with opaque paint could be used to reduce the brilliance if view impacts were too great. Russell Svardai commented that the Sea -First Bank across the street will block most of the Corey's sign so views should not be impacted. Boardmember Chalupnik disagreed and stated that for pedestrians walking west on the north side of Main Street, the sign would not be blocked by the Sea -First Bank building. Boardmember Sullivan clarified that there will be one red neon bar and that the inside of the letters will be red and the outer edges, out to the cabinet and the projections from the mansard roof, will all be green. Mr. Hawksworth stated that was correct. Board Chairman Young asked if both signs will be constructed the same way. He also inquired about the height of other illuminated signs near that same intersection. Mark Hawksworth stated that both signs will be constructed the same. John Bissell pointed out that the maximum sign height for freestanding signs in this area is 14 feet and all the neighboring signs were permitted under that Code section. The height of the Sea -First Bank building is approximately 18 feet. Board Chairman Young asked about the need for a sign which is more than 21 feet long. He stated that when the proposal was first submitted to the Board in October, Russell Svardal,indicated that if the sign was shorter, detail in the smaller words would be lost, and asked Mr. Hawksworth to comment. Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 3 November 19,1997 -f! Mark Hawksworth pointed out that the sign was designed to be compatible with the size of the building. He stated that the total sign area fits within the area allowed in the Code, and making the letters smaller would create technical difficulties because of the connection space required between each letter. Boardmember Pierce stated that the cabinet on the sign on the north elevation protrudes out from the building and asked if a pedestrian hazard could be created by placing the sign at the proposed height. Mr. Hawksworth explained that this sign has a cabinet depth of only four inches, plus the three and one- half inch depth of the letters, so should not protrude enough to be a hazard. Board Chairman Young asked Mr. Baker to comment on the reasons for selecting the sign on the north side of the building, and whether there is a concern about potential vandalism on a sign which is low and accessible to pedestrian traffic. Corry Baker commented that the sign on the north side was selected because it is consistent with the one on the east side of the building, as well as with signage used at Corry's other locations. He stated that vandalism has not been a problem with other signs placed at low levels. There were no audience comments on this proposal. John Bissell pointed out that in the past, the Architectural Design Board has had concerns with backlit awnings which were not opaque, creating an entire awning which was illuminated, and have been considered to be too brilliant and incompatible with adjacent uses. When illuminated signs have been proposed for the downtown area, the Board has had lengthy discussions regarding neon versus cabinet - faced construction as they relate to the appropriateness of the sign and the period of the building. In some cases, neon was introduced earlier in history, and cabinet faced signs have typically been discouraged, due to the incompatibility with neighboring uses. Mr. Bissell also explained that there have been previous discussions by the Board regarding the amperage of neon signs, and the brilliance of colors and difference types of neon tubes, versus the brilliance created by a fluorescent tube with a plastic face. Mark Hawksworth commented that historically, the original form of illumination was open neon, followed by fluorescent fixtures and then plastic faced fixtures. Boardmember Rubenkonig stated that she finds it difficult to approve this proposal because the distinctive neon approach to signage appears incompatible with the neighborhood, as previously referenced in ECDC Section 20.60.020.A.2.b. ® Boardmember Sullivan explained that after having seen the samples provided, and with the cabinet being enclosed on the back, he felt that the signs are now compatible. The building is relatively new with clean features and the design seems appropriate. He also suggested that the Board's motion include the stipulation that the proposed signage use the Clear Red neon. Boardmember Chalupnik pointed out that his only reservation is that the sign appears rather large, however, he would support approval. Boardmember Pierce stated that the storefront, the awning and the sign design are attractive and compatible and he would support approval as well. Boardmember Oaklief explained that although the building design more closely relates to a commercial strip rather than historic downtown Edmonds, and the proposed sign is well -designed and compatible Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 4 November 19,1997 with the architecture, these signs will be more prominent than many other signs in this area. He expressed concern that Clear Red neon will still be too brilliant, and would only support approval of the proposal if a less intense neon was used. Board Chairman Young stated that since seeing the neon samples, and with the cabinets now being enclosed, he feels that the sign is appropriate and would support approval. The other signs in the immediate area, including the traffic signal at the intersection, are all as bright or brighter than the signs which are proposed, and he finds these signs compatible with the other development in the neighborhood. Mr. Young commented that the brilliance of the signs would not impact the view since there are buildings right behind Corry's which already block the direct view to the sound and mountains. BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO APPROVE ADB-97-136 AS SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: THE CHANNEL LETTERS WILL BE PAINTED A MATCHING RED COLOR INSIDE ONLY AND THE EXTERIOR OF THE CHANNEL LETTERS AND THE RACEWAY CABINET WILL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE ROOF; AND, THE NEON TUBES WILL BE CLEAR RED NEON AS DEMONSTRATED AND DESIGNATED IN THE TRADE NAME, BECAUSE IT IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PARTICULARLY THAT SIGNS SHOULD BE PERPENDICULAR OR FLAT TO THE BUILDING AND BE AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THAT IT SATISFIES THE CRITERIA AND PURPOSES OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED IN THE PREVIOUS MOTION REGARDING ADB-97-116 ON OCTOBER 1, 1997. MOTION CARRIED WITH BOARDMEMBERS OAKLIEF AND RUBENKONIG VOTING NO. PRELIMINARYREVIEW.• None. 6. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS APPROVED BY STAFF WITHOUT ADB APPROVAL None. 7. BOARD DISCUSSION (Board Discussion was begun while awaiting the arrival of the applicant's representatives for ADB-97- 136). Board Chairman Young expressed concern about the magnitude of the Port of Edmonds' covered moorage facilities and commented that during the Board's deliberation on this project it would have been beneficial for the ADB to have had a better idea about whether the drawings the applicant presented gave a true representation of the massing of that facility. Both of the Boardmembers with architectural background were absent during that meeting, and Mr. Young stated that without their expertise, the plans and drawings did not appear as clear to the other Boardmembers as they should have. He suggested that for future proposals of this magnitude, the Board may wish to consider what type of exhibits would be appropriate so that more consistent decisions can be made. Boardmember Sullivan responded that all projects require engineering and architectural drawings and stated that if the Board feels the drawings presented do not represent the proposal adequately, they Architectural Design'Board Meeting Page 5 November 19,1997 0. should require the applicant to return with more detailed information before a decision is made. For example, an aerial rendering or model may have been appropriate for the type of project proposed by the Port. Board Chairman Young asked John Bissell to explain the Board's latitude in requesting different, and more extensive information from various applicants. John Bissell cautioned the Board when requiring additional information. The applicant has the burden of proving that their application meets all criteria which must be considered by the Board. If more information is requested, it must be because the Board feels the applicant has not proven their case and need the additional data to make a determination either to approve or deny the application. Mr. Bissell also pointed out that there have been other proposals considered by the Board where additional information was requested and appropriate questions asked, and he complimented the Board on the actions they have taken on other projects. However, he cautioned that if in denying a project the Board denies the use, then that is not within the ADB jurisdiction and the decision would not be valid because the Zoning Code is the instrument which allows the use. Boardmember Chalupnik commented that modulation was the key issue of concern when the Port's proposal was considered, and a great deal of discussion and very detailed recommendations for mitigation were given to the applicant. Board Chairman Young stated that in the past, the Board has, on occasion, omitted from approval, any sections of a proposal being considered when the Boardmember with expertise in that field was not present. He asked if a hearing can be continued to a later date when this occurs. John Bissell explained that, depending on time constraints for acting on the application spelled out in regulatory reform, and depending upon the type of additional information requested by the Board, it may be permissible in some cases to do this. Boardmember Oaklief commented that on proposals which will have a great deal of impact on the community, the Board should have the ability to request additional information which would allow them to make a complete, well -thought-out decision. He suggested that this could possibly be linked to the size of the project being proposed. Boardmember Rubenkonig pointed out that where modulation should take place is not always addressed adequately by the Board, and additional information should be made available to consider this issue. Board Chairman Young asked what information could be given to the applicant, before appearing before the Board, to outline the specific criteria which the project must meet for approval. John Bissell explained that the applicant is required to prove how the proposal meets the necessary criteria, and while the Board is not charged with designing a project, they can consider design alternatives brought by the applicant which may prove to be the best possible option. (The following remainder of Board Discussion was deferred until the regular agenda items were acted upon). John Bissell explained that the proposal considered at this meeting was a good example of an application which met the zoning code requirements but did not meet all the other criteria the Board must consider. This applicant returned to the Board with additional information and demonstrated how their proposal Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 6 November 19,1997 ,.., �«' ,.... c. ::,, .. th'+ ,...a,. � ; Y.?..�,r,a.,X>ai�.y.�-.�� J.s.. .k`5..�+�1';x„✓}, r.,!."�s �T,:':Yf,C�;S'Y�t_r'i .Kn�S'.. xsi'�:t ...s; �.�t+;K,ix �.. ..;r>��._±i�.a'.45t3�.�W�.L�iaStt6„3'�'rSe�`.�,'�a3�,r'�:it'`r`da"�55`Ur�P.bd+.lFrt �xx e,tixtS'�,, v"ir r:,'„�..;5. .n,ir ..r i...��s,?fr: ' } �' y Ix f�.. � 4 .y s t`k a i t s.ri f .' a x> r �# a � a a✓ , y r t 5 met the criteria the Board needs to consider. He encouraged continuation of the Board's requesting -additional information, when needed; and questioning of the applicants as to the reasons they feel that their proposals are appropriate and meet the criteria. z Boardmember Oaklief asked the Board about their reasons for approving Clear Red neon in the Corry's y Fine Dry Cleaning matter. �f. Boardmember Sullivan explained that the Clear Red neon was pleasing to him and felt that if they had required the applicant to select a color which was lower in the brilliance spectrum, the applicant would U) not have had a clear, definable direction. J F- .3 - ca W Boardmember Chalupnik agreed with Boardmember Sullivan and pointed out that thereare many issues LU 0 regarding how illumination is defined, such as intensity, brightness and illuminosity. When viewing the samples, he selected the Clear Red neon because it appeared that the illumination was coming from a wider area, but that intensity in the center was less than the other sample shown. Mr. Chalupnik pointed d y out that by limiting the current that flows through the neon tube, the brightness may be reduced, and this x; is an alternative the Board may wish to explore when considering similar proposals in the future. Z 1- 0 Boardmember Rubenkonig commented that there were five specific points of concern which were Uj.Uj brought up by the Board in their deliberation on this proposal. First, the architectural style of the a building was considered; second, was whether the neon is as soft as it could be; ,third, the impact on views is of more significance in the downtown corridor than in a strip mall; fourth, the downtown area is a not a strip mall where the usual pan channel letters would be considered; and, fifth, what were the _ reasons for this size of sign being proposed. If these issues, were not of concern for the Board, the U. approval would have been done more quickly, and discussion of these issues points out the need to ZI continue to explore such concerns in the future. U N! Boardmember Chalupnik noted that there are other cities he has visited which have had good control z over sign problems and would be willing to obtain information from those locations if the City felt it would be beneficial. r 8. ADJOURN BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER RUBENKONIG, TO ADJOURN AT 9:10 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. r Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 7 November l9; 1907 <r y z� 5 ryoe � PO O T i 9,bFS ST �P ADB-97-116 cu- 7-115 SITE DAYTON ST o WALNUT ST u 0-,,- Vicinity and Zoning Map A.MmenlY Flle AOB-9)118 GARAGELEVEL PLAN 1 0 p `1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME I. THI^$NOSICEIT IS DUETO_T_HEsOUAIITYOi CLEARTHAN DOCUMENT. LEAR THAN )CUMENT. DAYTON STREET 0 ' iot�i'w91 m 0 0 0 o a o o WON- �I!� i_ !! t'1116Yytq.illl �9� IGII�!� a Aug.;. emu',+. arrs..w • a • �..�,.�;■.� r��.gplll��,!i��r■i��■!■ m �..• mini II � ! •_ �- 0 :y rw� ------------------------------------------------------------- NORTH ELEVATIONMo .b a �w _________________________________________________________ SOUTH ELEVATION 5W., 1,10 AM �r—_e______._„\ M... zI ----------- ------ ----- BUILION _ DING/SITE CROSS SECTw 3 Style t,O %1 SEE LOW „ MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NEIGHT OF ROOF �i. ALLOWABLE EAVE HEIGHT NT i GECONG FLOOR eim NT o� EL 22.82' °040 X0 cernws .-......... jl.—'! �V FIRST FLOOR H-4--- i 'AVERAGE GRADE TO SET BUILDING P . SERVICE ALLEY /1 El. 12.]G' 3 w PARKtNG GARAGE - SECTION DETAIL A3.3 a I 7- � n...»... .........nwau.in.lt�eMaanw�s..+icnr.+.a.uw......�.Y..L.�:i; ... ....—. * t rw s._.- ...............:':'x.�i.._............_.........�_� ..�...,..... Op DIETERICH 1 g99 y7 Z M I T H U N P fs'�ji'i,,. ©11 a �— F- w44' April 17,1997 w Mr. Jeff Wilson Co uJi Planning Supervisor Lu X. City of Edmonds Dept of Community Development (n u. 250 5th Avenue North L 0 Edmonds WA 98020 U. Re: Sunrise Assisted Living of Edmonds, Preliminary Site Studies D f M Job No. 96047.50 Dear Jeff: Z Z 0 ; The'purpose of this letter is to provide you with a brief narrative description of the proposed Sunrise g� of Edmonds Assisted Living project, at the request of Jim Miller of LSA. We have enclosed 7 copies of the 3 page "preliminary site studies plans that were presented to Sunrise on April 12,1997 as a O — demonstration of the project "fit and appropriateness" for this desirable site in downtown Edmonds. a t Also enclosed for your information is a copy of their brochure which discusses Sunrises philosophy of care. We are currently preparing a brief zoning investigation, engineering site feasibility study, and N a phase I environmental assessment for Sunrise. This information, coupled with Sunrise's own market analysis, will determine whether an assisted living project of the size and quality, typical of all Sunrise sii tn' projects, will be feasible for this site. We are requesting a pre -application meeting with you and your staff on April 28 in order to discuss this project, and to review the City of Edmonds zoning & land ause issues in more detail. ' The proposed project is to be Iocated at the corner of Dayton Street and 2nd Avenue South. It will occupy a 60,000 SF site that is adjacent to the recently completed Edmonds Financial Center mixed - use project that occupies the remainder of the block. The proposed building will be 2 stories of type V-1 hour construction above a concrete one story parking garage, and will consist of 70 units of V assisted living residential units and support areas. The residential unit sizes range from approximately 350 SF to approximately 500 SF. The building will include common areas such as a main living room, a dining room large enough to accommodate the residents in one sitting, a parlor & lounge areas, a commercial kitchen, exercise and rehab areas, and nurse staff and administrative { areas. Additional amenities for the residents include crafts rooms and hobby spaces, and a sunny p outdoor courtyard. There will also be a landscaped Alzhiemer's courtyard that will provide a protected recreation space for residents with dementia. The parking garage will be designed with a flat floor with minimal slope to drain, and is large enough to accommodate approximately 62 cars, within the perimeter floor line of the building. Required parking as defined in the Edmonds Community Development code for "assisted living" will probably fall under the convalescent/retirement requirements of 1 car for every 3 beds. (Since this project will go through the Conditional Use Permit process, we will assume that the city planning ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL CARE COMMUNITY 414 OLIVE WAY SUITE _500 SEATTLE WA 98101 (206) 623 3344 FAX (206) 623 7005 r 1 f 1z r C 4,r tr 4� . ,;�,,,,,..Hza • s,rxina.,ssuaar.N", ' .. t rt. ) : t '.. .,...._,.:•,...:.'S _.:.•(:. r i i } . x.. __ -._ : is, ....,..... , (13 CB j W/SOLID LKG LID " apb 2 11-00 �/ f LtBi�++!�it r Wr. CL f IN( Ul o ' PL TO TO i. to WLU t SIt CAI LL/ ��'� C� 4 REST 54"DIA. TYPE 2 J 1 W/SOLID LKG LID NO SC/ TOP = 18.19 X. INV = 16.76-8"CP(E) z W t jam\ V/ t w L.EGAL:. DESCRIPTION x c�?i LL Parcel A - LU y` That portion Of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range Nt 3 bast, W.M., described as follows: ticghtning at the northwcst corner of Third anti Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; thence west 338 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 1' I8'22 R, a Z distance of 263.88 fret; thence N 88*41 22" W, a distance of 231.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR- 104. as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 2141566. said margin being a curve to the left 113ving a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve hears S 72'52'59" E; thence southerly along the are of said curve to the left and consuming n central angle of 9'27'11", an are distance of 82.49 feet to a point 100 feet easterly, as "-Za' nteasurcil radially to ilie 1, line, of I Iighway Engineers Station 20+00; thence S 23'25'27 W, n distance 30 of 61,26 feet to a point opposite and 80 feet easterly of highway 1 ngincers Station 20+68.17 P.T.; )i thence S 1'i19'15" W, 80 feet easterly and 111MIlel of said 1 tine, a distance of 106.83 feet to a point opposite I lighway Engineers Station 21 +75, thence 5.44 26 45" 13, a distance or 2R.10 feet to apoint 20 opposite f [ighway linginccrs Station 9+00 and 30 feet northerly, as measured at right angles to the t centerline of Dayton Street, thence S 88*41*22" E. along the northerly margin of Dayton Street, a distance of _249.74 feet to the fruc Point of Ileginthtg: i EXCEPT the cast 30 feet thereof for road. Parcel It h That portion of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of .Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 1'sasi, W.bi., described as follows: 1lecinning at the northwestantler of'fhird and Dayton Streets in E �� the City of- Edmmnds; thence west 338 feet; thence N l' 18'22" E. a distance of 263.88 feet; thence N 88'41'22" W. a distance of 30,00 feet to the 'fruc Point of Beginning-. thence continuing N 88*41 *22" W. a distance of 201.24 feet to the easterly margin of SR-104, as conveyed to the State of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's bile No's. 2141566 and 2184033, said margin being a curve to the right having a radius of 500.00 feet and ,front which intersection point the center of said .". j ;.5 curcc.beirs S 72'52 59 li; thence northerly :long the are of said curve to the right and consuming a central angle of 13' 15'33", cut are distance of `115,71 feet to [tie ' b point of tangency: thence ��,� fl'�_ N 30'22'34" F. along said easterlyntar'in,. % distance of 94.61 feet to the southerlymargin of lames t�'W 12�►f 1 r kyr Street; thence S 59'34*37" E, alog said southerly margin,'a distance of 185.49 f et tothewesterly margin of 2nd Avenue S.; thence S 30'24' 17" W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 104.57 feet; S thence S 1' 18'22' W, along said westerly margin, a distance of 7.78 feet to the True.Point of Beginning. . 4 r 0000,00 �.�. FOP *4��'ALj,.}5�.+�'y�nSis ct e� Date Application Complete: . ................... October 31, 1997 Project Location:.......... 141 Dayton St., Edmonds Project Description: Public meeting to consider recommendation to the Hear Examiner for a new 81-t assisted living elderly c; facility. Pull Date: December3,1997 Time: 7:00 P.M. Other 'Required Permits not yet applied for (if known): ..................... Unknown Required Studies related to the project: Unknown Related Environmental Critical Areas Checklist 81 State Documents: - .......... Environmental Policy Act Public Comments Due:- December 3, 1997 t: .................. John Bissell anon Plaza Meeting Room - 650 Main St., Edmonds Information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Community Services Department, 121 Sth Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. (425) 771-0220. Public comments should also be sent to this add... The decision on this development pphommn will bemmiv within 120days ofthe date of add uismd hsz—unoo requests. Net, I that I abdh� to I appeal a deowmi "V� the permit The removal, mutilation, destruction, mconcealmant of this This notice may be removed Warning! notice before the hearing data Is a misdemeanor punishable by after. Dec, 3, 1997 fine and imprisonment. Place: 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR CAMERELLI'S 178 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 NT uo. Lu; 0 E 0� S, A 98020 232703-1-04e %.004 Occ CUPANT Luti A z I.-; ED S, W 98020 z ui Lul 2 mi 232703-1.045-0004 OCCUPANT OR CITY JUICE & JAM 0 190 SUNSET AVE, SUITE 123 t= EDMONDS, WA 98020 Lul UL ot zi 232703-4-080-0004 EDMONDS LUMBER CO. & HARDWARE 228 5TH AVE. S. 0 EDMONDS, WA 98020 z 232703-4-081-0003 PORT OF EDMONDS 160 W. DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-085.0009 NELSON, MARVIN R. & LESLIE A, 209 DAYTON ST., #101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-089-0005 NELSON, MARVIN R. & LESLIE 209 DAYTON ST., #101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-092-0000 OCCUPANT/PINKHAM'S PILLOW B&S 202 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045.0004 OCCUPANT OR THAI PARK 182 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR RACEWAY HOBBIES 188 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR THE ASSOCIATES 194 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR ANTHIS 190 SUNSET AVE, SUITE 119 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-080.0004 BARKER, FLOYD & JANET-TRUSTEES 815 STH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-082-0002 OCCUPANT 146 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-087-0007 OLYMPIC DRIVE ASSOCIATES 1233 OLYMPIC DRIVE EDMONDS, WA 98026 232703-4-0y-0001. 4548-002-019-0006 EDMIXCITY 12DMONDS 250 5 1 AVE. N. 5 S, E6% WA 98020 232703-4-092-0000 AGLOW INT'L POB 1548 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR HOMESTYLE LAUNDRY 184 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR WATERFRONT ANTIQUE MALL 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT, SUITE 1298 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045- 04 CCUPA T ACCENT IN E 1 E, SUITE 111 ED NDS, WA 98020 232703-4-081 -QP03 EWC TOOR SO. BLDG. #3 1 .0 980., DS. 98020 232703-4-082-0002 MILLER, ROBIN L. & CAROL 17358 BEACH DR. NE SEATTLE, WA 98155 232703-4-087-0007 RESIDENT 223 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-09 ?0001 SEWAG T 'ATMENT PLANT 2ND & Dvv-IwON EDMO S, A 98020 ZN 23703-4-093-0009 LORETTA LIND 222 DAYTON ST.,- #3 EDMONDS, WA 98020 �v 23703-4-095-0007 RALPH SORENSEN 222 3RD AVE S EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-001-0006 OCCUPANT/ALASKA NW PURL 130 2ND AVE S EDMONDS, WA 98020 0! oil 4548-0 -013- 2 xi Occ A PRECISION ED S. W 98020 o1 4548-001-001-0008 RESIDENT 221 JAMES ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-005-0004 EIN DMD EDMO S, WA 98020 4548-001-017-0000 MAR VEL MARBLE, INC. P.O. BOX 1449 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-023-0002 OCCUPANT/SEA MTN INSURANCE 131 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 6464-000-003-0003 GARRISON, REV. LIVING TRUST 210 3RD AVE. S. #C EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-105-0005 HASSON, ROBERT A. & MARCELLA L. 200 JAMES ST. #105 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ifs '� ! ( 4 1 t l 4548402-019-0105, 4548.603-001-0004 4548.002-001-0006 WA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION ROBERT'A HENNING P.O. BOX 47300 101 JAMES ST OLYMPIA, WA 98504 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-004.0003 NORHAWK INVESTMENTS, INC. 120 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-017-0008 RIO PETROL, INC. 100 2ND AVENUE SOUTH #11 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-003-0006 TINDALL, THOMAS R. 126 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-00 -007- 02 T I TD. PTNSHP. V #1000 S LE, WA 8121 4548-001-017-0000 OCCUPANT 202 MAIN ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 6464-000-001-0005 HELDE, ERLINE A. & M.A. 210 3RD AVE. S. #A EDMONDS, WA 98020 6464-000-004-0002 WILLIAMS, DONALD T. & PATRICIA E. 210 3RD AVE. S. #D EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-103.0007 TELFORD, RICHARD K. & BLISS E. 200 JAMES ST. #103 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-106-0004 MCMANUS, STEPHEN 200 JAMES ST. #106 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-013-0002 LCM 144 RAILROAD AVE #204 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001 1 08 M 1 M W. & bfLORES %OS, A 98020 4548-00-005-000 TH VE. P1 _ D.,TNSHP 20 I S A , W 8129 4548-001-007-0002 RE T ED:FDS. WA 98020 4548-001-020-0605, 4548.001-023-0002 HOPPER, HAROLD A. & CAROLEE 530 BELL ST.. SUITE 1000 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6464-000-002-0004 AUST, DOROTHY G. 210 3RD AVE. S. #8 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-101-0009 JENSEN STERLINE V ET UX 200 JAMES ST. , #101 EDMONDS, WA 96020 6782-000-104-0006 YOUNKIN, MERRILL V. & DOROTHY V. 200 JAMES STREET #104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-107-0003 WYMAN & HELEN GUTHRIE 200 JAMES STREET #107 EDMONDS, WA 98020 r , 6782-000-108-0002 BALLARD, RONALD D. & LORETTA 200 JAMES STREET #108 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-203-0006 PARKS, THOMAS D. 200 JAMES STREET #203 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-206-0003 DAVISON, MARGUERITE G. 200 JAMES ST. #206 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-301-0007 HVATUM, ARTHUR R. & LOUISE J. 200 JAMES ST. #301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-304-0004 EDSON PECK TRUST 200 JAMES ST. #304 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-307-0001 STOKES, OPEL LOREE 200 JAMES ST. #307 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-401-0006 FARRELL, EVERETT J. 200 JAMES ST. #401 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-404-0003 HAMMERSLA, WILLIAM 0. 200 JAMES STREET #404 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-407-0000 CARLJOHNSON TRUST 200 JAMES STREET #407 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-201-0008 ARGENT, CARROLL B. 200 JAMES ST. #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-204-0005 EVARTS, ARLENE F. 200 JAMES STREET #A-204 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-207-0002 WUSCRER, RALPH & CLUTE CAROL 200 JAMES ST. #207 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-302=0006 BUNDY, VICTOR C. & MILDRED L. 200 JAMES ST. #302 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000 05-0 3 SC U 2 #305 ED S, W 98020 6782-000-308-0000 ELWAY, ROBERT 41804 264TH S.E. ENUMCLAW, WA 98022 6782-000-402-0005 BRUNSVOLD, S.K. 200 JAMES ST. #402 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-405-0002 WESTON, G.T. 200 JAMES STREET #405 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-408-0009 KENNETH & SHIRLEY FARIS 200 JAMES ST, #408 EDMOND, WA 98020 7876.000-201-0003 TUCKER, RICHARD G. & DOROTHY M. 114 2ND AVE. S., #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 s782-vo0-zoz-aav7 SEASORG, HAROLD J. & ELLIE 200 JAMES ST. #202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-205-0004 MEDALIA, MICHAEL J. & GENE H. 200 JAMES ST. #205 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-208.0001 KROON, WILLIAM D. & LUCILLE M. 200 JAMES STREET #208 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-303.0005 BAST, WILLIAM C. 200 JAMES STREET #303 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-306-0002 BILLE & LENORE CADE 200 JAMES ST, #306 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-308-0000 RESIDENT 200 JAMES ST. #30& EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-402-0004 GREGERSON, BARBARA A. 200 JAMES ST. #403 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-406-0001 GRANT-ELWAY, DOROTHY 200 JAME ST. #406 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876.000-100-0005 MARINER PLAZA 20146 25TH NW SEATTLE, WA 98177 7876-000-201-0003 R I T , 1 201 E S, A 98020 'F a .h a t•- �T a .��. � 4+,{ sr. C v� K - � i cv a 2r8 tG�$�� rF tr E� ^yy L i a t 2 v ;t , � u � t t t14 t i + � � .( �•J p 6� e ' . f tt �, r+i /t [ s s �� f ,,: r 7876-000.202 0002 7S76-oo0 2az-ooa2 7876-0o0-2a3-0001 ERWERT, WILLIAM RESIDENT WAGNER, M. JOE 114 2ND AVE. S. #202 116 2ND AVE. S., #202 114 2ND AVE. S. #A EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876-000-203-0001 8139-000-001-0006 8139-000.002-0005 Z' RESIDENT GOODWIN, JOY BERGMANN, JOHN G. & SUSAN M. 116 2ND AVE. S., 203 152 3RD AVE. S. #A 152 3RD AVE. S. #B EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 d �s V� U.ps 8139-000-003-0004 8139-00003-00 cn 8139-000.004-0003 T(` TIITON, MlCHAEIlCHIYOKO OC U WIGGINS, JACK & KAREN 4904 WEST VICKERY BLVD. 1 C 152 3RD AVE. S. #D - U.0 FORT WORTH, TX 76107 ED , W 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 w 8139-000.101 005, 8139.000-102.0004, 8139-000- 01-0 5 8139-000- 2-0004 m 8139.00 20 8139.000-202.0003 REPI RE 1 C" R TIES CORP 1 i 1 I-. 12 TEST ED , WA - 02CO ED WA 0202 1--� SEA LE, 109 o W uil jMl 8139-000-2a -00o 6139-000-202-0003 8139-000-216-0009 'ai REST N R D MEEKS, JOHN N. ET AL pV 150 # 1 15 15553 HEINTZ AVE SE h EDMO , WA 9 20 ED DS, W 98020 MONROE, WA 98272 ' 8139-000- 16-0 9 iu RESIDE 15 #216 Eb S, WA 98020 Z w t NER .-,. .. .. , . ,, b , • t ._ ».. z=c n4.._t+.,,.'k ... , i,_+;,dS.r'�t�n� 6'�f F d'4 �+'� ki....sr1_X-1 1.,�'4:-^4%x FILE NO.: CU-97-115 z APPLICANT: Sunrise NOTICE OF APPLICATION J�` AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (n;o Lt tl STATE.OF WASHINGTON z' COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) LU W�' o I, Karissa Kawamoto, first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: LU That on the 18th day of November, 1997, the attached Notice of Application was �' posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Civic Center and -the Library, and where applicable on or near the subject property. y t Signed Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of •►� ., 19 9 7- . t Notary Public in and for t tate Washington,` ®, f G Residing at i S. `;}'t`:t5f, +" t ^^St 1 S J i t4 °ti'' 'E.i+j» >41r"ryfl f .�..+ 4 + y yr .� St y K �.,& riiJ .d rC"i1 =,}Sd!.,,hu3 f�.t '.'f�FFrr�." j� ty4a A i, +y 'kxr".K sF t rJ t ! : YV j,4t,;y��. i.� e �j� i f {i F.{:.�'4 �i�; Yr 1 i T { .1 S ��'5.4,f z 2i( �. it 1ij ✓.f... i { 7 r1f. J t sA>�''t i e'� F 1 1.� } ..,..,...v_... ..... r,..e;.:..f:+..a•.i:,+.s�` :c'.�y ...,.�. 1_ _. °s ..::!;. �� .l"., r, .. , t 1 _t t S r.t ,?fit ,i:i,4,'� i._ `"� ..� � ....�._ RECEIVED ! NOV 2 51997 } EDP ONDS CITY CLERKr Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON. 2 COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, � [ r-ill![" 1jp; U O F sio ie o . e� ;, The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says N .j that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper - _3 P printed and published in the City of • Everett, County of Snohomish, cn + _ and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of LU r i yr general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper .Y ?&,' has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior S ..oily Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ................................... Z Architectural Design Board Hearing & Development .......... ....... f Duifl�. k AQP1icaCionfEd ............................... ,• ........ P 1.. Rv Project No ADB 97 80 O a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said = uo I newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and ` entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: Z tLU1 tn` November 17, 1997 »lw ,b..........•............•.•.•....,• ..................•............ y i L.................................................. I .......................... • ...........• and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. ..........�%fzf t ef: :..�..k.� !1 _ Principal Clerk i f' 3' Subscribed and sworn to before me this.. 18th s, h ovember ! o .. .., 19.....97 n , 1 © ....................... .. ....... ...................... Notary Public in and for a St a of asbington, residing at Everett, Snohomish 00 �iON #,t• x�4` AR f .. •1 (� `•v tSti,'��Y ice, �� k�'�' M "' Y . -.� z M1c ' `Yd +t f ° 1 ! 5 tt. a ,.X.�,I''t`F r ��`''�u� �4 r h� rip+;y%` nGl� ' %t., ',{`� t� "`4i ik.,� "`�7 i•.. i �_ �i 1q k { � s t 5{ - 'Cox 0 sa � � < .t t � d 1✓ `rt ii Coaadi:mity, ftarvfcas maperemans --••--lditff�finfi-Pfannfnfl-�nrllnaarfng t � t -sth Aveaaa Aforeft • end frfcsor • ffdniondo•. WA% 90020 Phc ino: (426) 771-0220 : PAkX: (425) 771-0221 FAGL9G 4= C�oNfp—R P^c3 s From: 1) l-ayt&, •� - - , i Date TransmIttefl: t l t3�`3 T N,ry. c,f Pagesa �- u ' Pteclpl+er9t's Fax Wo: 33-1- (Including cover rraRe.) O V G Feaeimile Equipment: ^utorrtavc/f3roup 11 (:..'...3 mina.); G3roup.111. u�y 4ti , If thara are any iaroioieme ciurino tranomlaalean or clooumento era reaalved Inaompiate. piaasa .. LU oeil (200) t77,-0230 anei eak for to C Fta: Lrr P,t/��. .� •� 1 tar a - X Z. 0� W LLI tJ f/9 0 �,,, 6:rsosptionVmna/Btxehsst.d*c - - - Uj U. —t - TRANSMISSION REPORT V THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE). . WAS SENT ** COUNT # 2 :k** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 0000 11-13-97 2:52PM 11131, 2 w c� F- 0 z 0.' j/ter- \t �(j/n1��♦•Y.�I�i ��M�� City of Edmonds Community Services Department Building-Planning4ngineering 121-5th Avenue Worth ® 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 FAX COVER PAGE To: rho Ij U.,A, From: 1b1,ane- n Date Transmitted: I 13 1- No. of Pages: (including cover page.) {Recipient's Fax No: Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group 11 (2,3 mins.); Group_I11. If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (206) 771-0220 and ask for execeptionijana/faxshest.doc t t {rR = tr ! .A t t t� d � t�a6t a '. X i a ? 9 a r1. '': Z 4 i ✓ � i r� .. ' r 'f -rr t f �i'r� tf St .{ t4 ! t Yr <x t t Jr i5✓''5 a <�': t y 17t t r . {{fi�r , { THIS IS A LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT AND SHOULD BE BILLED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD PUBLIC BEARING & NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION i Name of Applicant: Ed -Lynn, L.L.C. Project Number: ADB-97-80 �° Project Location: 7710196th . SW, Edmonds �s Project Description: Request r final approval of new 17-unit multiple family 0; dwellin complex with opment components within the i;' Clty Edmonds and ity of Lynnwood. -' I- City Contact: Jo Bissell `- U. Public Comment Period Due By: 1 3197 LU Name of Applicant: Sunrise Development, Inc. Project Number: CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 Project Location: 141 Dayton St., Edmonds Z' Project Description: Public meeting to consider a recommendation to the Hearing }„ Examiner for a new 81-unit assisted living elderly care facility. Us wl City Contact: John Bissell 2 51 Public Comment Period Due By: 12/3/97 r PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION u. zt DATE: December 3, 1997 cn TIME: 7:00 PM' E- = LOCATION: Plaza Meeting Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds t� z Sandy Chase, City Clerk Publish: November 17,1997 i. /A� .r ° � W -. c t r �'r,�'c� i, \� 34xt�ttt:F �r� r+ rvi�, ' F. 'T✓^��., � ''t ,� Y',7,� S S si'r ..�v,� :'aG. ', 1.�i�!+.�•rc.'�. at�'€; +ri'.c �YkT',Si?ry`.fi'v t�✓+�`.,��4s�'�.\'�`«'^i��N �i k� Fteciplent's Fax Wo:_-- cinciuctl7fg cover page.) Faomlm8a Equipmant: ^uto *Amtlo/Oroup 11 ta., miner.); caroup.111. of thora are any problamir during tranamiaalon or dooumonta era ra0alvad Inaomplata. 'ploaoa oni! (200) 779-0220 and Oak for COUNT �k 2 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 0000 11-13-97 2:52PM 1'13" 2 tY of Edmonds Community! Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 121-5th Avenue North ® 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 FAX COVER PAGE To: "h t6 �Ao 4) From: Diane, Date Transmitted: (3 No. of Pages: (including cover page.} Recipient's Fax No: `33`� -��. Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group 11 (2,3 miss.); Group.111. If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (206) 771-0220 and ask for c:recep6on1jana/faxsheetdoc ': s r t a � R sA ✓ci ! 1! k .t r '1.:� �r s ! �.' ¢ � ,} .:. f � f ' �s { �L THIS IS A LEGAL A6 c'''�tRTISEMENT AND SHOULD BE1:'JLED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD PUBLIC HEARING & NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Q Name of Applicant: Ed -Lynn, L.L.C. Project Number: ADB-97-80 Project Location: 7710196th St. SW, Edmonds :- Project Description: Request for final approval of a new 17-unit multiple family c of dwelling complex . with. development_ components within the w$ City of Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood. _J N} City Contact: John Bissell W 0 Public Comment Period Due By: 12/3/97 w� J Name of Applicant: Sunrise Development, Inc. Project Number: CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 zLa ig Project location: 141 Dayton St., Edmonds I—Project Description: Public meeting to consider a recommendation to the Hearing ?;. Examiner fora new 81-unit assisted living elderly care facility. z o"' City Contact: John Bissell i a Public Comment Period Due By: 12/3/97 �o ® PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION u} DATE: December 3, 1997 z TIME: 7:00 PM L ) T LOCATION: Plaza Meeting Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds z Sandy Chase, City Clerk Publish: November 17,1997 .j ® @°,�"} ,'4i-Itsf 4 2'a'''"`+a fs '�."!"�w_t,jb5-� Y fp7 a nd`4 z .�, F:�^�„' '?i;'$ .ic �>.?^•i. i,;9 y'tE+�'��t'6tAr��{r, „��},_;`�,r''.,>^�:¢��r�'ic��.:r,�f:�;�`�"'?CSk�+l�a^`'1j+i,5tet4' } .�,u .y, .. -f Ez wak`1:.. +ttxs:,auxww e._.i:`�`� •uun.smw.ew• �vW,wA�WC.iY�rniF6�eeau:,:: "�` �'t r � � t:,,,t�,r5 7. j � '� t _'�•� S . 0. CITY YOF E1.: MONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 •,(425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Z 4 C�.1890 Public Works • Planning/Building + Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant a Transmittal 01. - n � I` Date: November 13, 1997 crs To: Environmental Review Section a Department of Ecology ui PO Box 47703 `L Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Z of uJ LU Subject: 141 Dayton St., Edmonds (File Nos. CU-97-115/ADB-97- a 116) or z U Transmitting Mitigated Determination of Nornsignificance & U.a Environmental Checklist v o For Your Information: X z As you requested: For your file: j Comment: Note attachments: Sincerely, Y� 1 " i4fG g{ti S YFI 'T�J WQ Ay �j I p W.F t s -` [ tZ •^ ,f Ott}tgr rf :. , 4 tf $....�..E.....ww...;,+'`..l.�umm,�amw.eua ,.m•A ..nev.,w. .. .i,r3vwnmaure :,n �S'� ..... IPCITY OF EDMONDS N S +r. aso 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 s . H. LUfi RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsi nificance NS 8 (DNS) m Q MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE c.� o WLU Description of proposal: Construction of a new 81 bed assisted elderly care facility with 65 associated parking .. stalls. (City of Edmonds File No. CU-97.115/ADB-97-116), N IL LU Proponent: Sunrise Development Inc., 1420 Sth Ave, STE 220, Seattle, WA 98101 Q Location of proposal, including street address if any: 141 Dayton Street. u Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS x Z The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the )—I environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was LU,j made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This V' information is available to the public on request. = There is no comment period for this DNS. W W� x ca; h xx This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will n t act on this proposal for 15 days from LL. 0! . the date below. Comments must be submitted by ! Z 7 1997. iti tA'� W H Responsible Officiab effrey S. Wilson PositionMde: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 Sth Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date:4''7 Signature: ,. XX You may appeal this determination to Robert have, Planning. Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, 0 Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 1 Z 1 Z» 190, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact leffrev S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on /1� ,1997, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services �. 1. Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. x 4lFrt ; s XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this forth, along with a copy of the Checklist. Page 1 of 2 camu5.00c 11nr97sEPn �,,., of ED,y A IP Date: November 11, 1997 To: File No. CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 From: John Bissell, Senior Planner Via: Jeffrey S. Wilson, Responsible Official Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 81 BED ASSISTED ELDERLY CARE FACILITY WITH 65 ASSOCIATED PARKING STALLS- FILE NO. CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmental checklist, site plan, landscape plan, building elevations, and traffic study which have been prepared for the project. A copy.of these documents are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that a mitigated determination of nonsignificance be issued for the project. A traffic study prepared by Lovell Sauerland & Associates has revealed an impact to the level of service of the intersection of Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue. The applicant has calculated the subject project share of improvements to that intersection. The City concurs with the calculations presented by the traffic study. Based on my review of all information and adopted policies of the City, I am recommending that the proposal be changed or clarified to include the followingmitigating measures so that a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) can be issued. Recommended Mitigation Measures: I. The Applicant is required to contribute a traffic mitigation fee of $2,152.00 for the improvement to the intersection of Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the proposed building. This recommendation is based on adopted policies of the City as found in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), Tide 15. SpecificalIy, the following apply: Policy The City of Edmonds Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan discusses Level Of Service in Chapter 2. Page 32, of Edmonds Transportation Element states that "Edmonds Arterials will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better." City of Edmonds caz Planning Division CU971159.00C I U12W. - tr c5 x ,rt r i � tJp r � 4.�y it t �.Ys :3�➢ f} s .+^ > t f t x - ' 1 CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST l A. BACKGROUND z _ F. L Name ofproposedproject, if applicable. - Sunrise Assisted Living Conditional Use Permit v .o� UJI Z Name of applicant. (n o Sunrise Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: U. M C) Applicant: Mr, David Segl Contact: Anthony Roth iE Li Sunrise Development, Inc. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. z r; 1420 Fifth Ave., Suite 2200 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite 200 zI Seattle, Washington 98101 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 LU LU� Telephone: (206) 224-2881 Telephone: (425),775-1591 0 F 4. Date checklist prepared: x LU �' August 29, 1997 t— r� LL of z� S. Agency requesting checklist: Uj U)' x o City of Edmonds z 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): f Construction is anticipated soon after granting of the Conditional Use Permit.(CUP). 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None beyond construction of a 67 unit assisted living facility, parking garage, outside parking and utilities. & List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Conditional Use Permit Site plan 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly CV affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Neither the applicant nor contact person know of any such pending applications, beyond the instant application. a`C rs . K ilk s rcty�'M1 f ^4L�{'�rf�r sf t, �94 -' .�, 51� <�� 7�1� 1 � ,, du,i A- l��v� `�• m0 W. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Conditional Use Permit Approval - City of Edmonds IL Give brief, complete description ofyourproposal, including the proposed use and the sue of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal Yau do not need to repeat those answers on this pagz (Lead agencies may modem this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The requested CUP is to allow for construction of a two-story, 67 unit assisted living facility over an enclosed garage. A total of 67 parking spaces, including 4 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The existing vacant 9,500 square foot building will be removed. 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if knowm If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailedplans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The instant proposal is located west of the ferry holding lanes (SR 104), east of 2nd Street and north of Dayton Street in the City of Edmonds; in the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., Edmonds, Washington. A legal description and vicinity map are included in the instant application. TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one): j7a , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. The development area is a flat paved area and building occupying approximately 44 percent of the site. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The development area on the site is flat. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? Ifyou know the classification of agricultural soils, speck them and note any prime farmland The development area of the site is paved and based on soils classification mapping presented in the Soil Survey of Snohomish County, Washington (USDA Soil Conservation Service), the site's soils are classified as Urban Land. 2 1 d Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describer No indications of unstable soils are apparent: e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed Indicate source of file This request is for conditional use permit only. Grading will be limited to removal of " paving and installation of utilities. f." Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally' describe None is anticipated. - g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Building and impervious coverage is estimated at 80 percent. Is. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No such impacts are anticipated. " Z AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Automobile emissions will be generated by traffic to and from the site during construction and subsequent occupation. Amounts of dust and air pollution generated by the project will be minimal and insignificant. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vehicle emissions from adjacent streets. G Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None are proposed. 3 r- 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Ifyes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river u flows into. None in the immediate vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans The project will not require work in or over any surface water body. 3) Estimate the amount offi/l and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from any surface water body as part of this project. A) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are planned as part of this project. S) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year f loodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge No discharge of waste materials into surface water is proposed. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals ...; agricultural, eta). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 4 tnz.. a S j n� Cori i t� ) 'i r � 1 ,• l- } r�i t X �' 5 Sv Rll t j. .. gat.:mace+anstc4.,.:5.3•.w��,K.&t�iYasF w#at,��;, f:� ; �� rl . 1�'> r 4-!.; . .:L�: .t{. �5� a t , a,i_ -- � `I � -f. � -t f tt d i The wastewater collection for the proposed project will be provided by the City of Edmonds. No domestic waste material will be discharged into the ground. z a Water Runoff (Including storm water): cc w' 2� 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and v p( disposal, ifany (include quantities, if known). Where will this waterflow? Will this cn waterJlow into other waters? If so, describe. � w tom- - LU The principal source of runoff will be rainwater and snow melt from the roofs and LU parking areas on the site and discharge will be to existing receiving facilities. U. 2), Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describes N. A typical component of stormwater from roads and parking areas is petrochemicals z =i-; and the products of internal combustion engines. Stormwater runoff from impervious 0'surfaces will be collected and discharged to existing facilities, consistent with current w LU uses. v m Domestic sewage service will be provided by the City of Edmonds, UJ n X LU d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, . LL if any: _z - U N No such measures are indicated, 'ram 0 z 4. PLANTS a. Underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: x shrubs .,p. :. x grass pasture f . _ crop or grain g ._ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbaee other: _ water plants: water lily, eelgra.5.s, milfoil, other: none other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will.be removed or altered? The majority of the existing grass lawn will be removed. 5 � .� �ii `' h iA.{ k k�, ��. L }a4� L � K i t�`Jz.»........� u* u.��:ah.: t...i�{��rv�:. t.l /ti��3-.a�. h i9.c i :a:»id�v � � �,,, � �, ��..a....) � !ti '� Liuf'� � ,a.....✓',wn'•'. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site • No threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on or in the vicinity of the site. z � y d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: U g New landscaping will: be provided with an emphasis on appearance treatment of the frontage along SR 104. UJ Cn Its J �� w ® S. ANIMALS qa. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are m a known to be on or near the site: x w' birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songh'ri sd other. typical small: northwest birds and OR; seabirds . ur wi mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. none p{ fish:. bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other., none u m_ © r b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. s UJ u o No"threatened or endangered animal species are known to exist on or in the vicinity z of the site UJ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 0 z y The subject property is not known to be part of migration route. d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: No such measures are proposed. J }- 7 d i:r r t t b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No such impacts are anticipated for this project. c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None beyond the new energy code for energy demand, insulation and infiltration. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk offire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None are anticipated. 1) Describe special emergency services that might'be required, Standard police, fire and emergency medical services in the event of accident, fire or unusual emergency event. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Meet all City of Edmonds provisions for fire and life safety. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft, other)? Noise from traffic using adjacent roadways provide the principal source of noise at the site and the Burlington Northern Rairoad rails are two blocks to the west, but with standard construction, no related impacts are anticipated. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example. traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: Sources of noise will be construction activity and related traffic and will be limited to Monday through Saturday 7 AM - 7 PM. Lang -term: Human activity and related traffic will be expected to generate noise in the completed project. Noise will occur associated with peak traffic hours of the day. A jai ;F'Ib r,fi 31 s, :zy{ tiF�t+�shi t aG 1F r+f if 'r"rrY Y i , 2 i,X ri ��`rr� r . r 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short-term: Construction activity and related traffic will be limited to Monday z through Saturday 7 AM to 7 FM. Vehicles will use properly maintained exhaust (, systems, and engines will be turned off when not in use. cc Long-term: Residential occupation is not anticipated to result in a significant noise �.0 increase on the site. LU 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE W LL w a. What is Ilse current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently occupied by a vacant office building. The ferryterminal waiting ; vy" lines are to the west. Across Dayton Street to the south is the City of Edmonds Sewage Treatment Facility. To the southwest is a bank, within Harbor Square. To the Z tr i southeast is the Driftwood Players. To the east, across 2nd Street, is an office building z o' and a condominium. A condominium is adjacent to the north. ut ua o b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe p t- No agricultural uses have occurred in the recent past. LUul U.ri a Describe any structures on the site. Z v A single -story office building is located on the site. or z d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures will be removed. i e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned BC (Community Business). f. What is the current compreltensive plan designation of the site? 0, The Edmonds Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Downtown Activitiy Center (Mixed Use Commercial). i g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of file site? 1 . There is .no such designation of this site. �I 8 5r* tn.y�$dy�j�,,^„tt N IN k x r :. ©. V.. h. Hasany part of rite site been classyled as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If .. so, specify. No. L Approximately howmany people would reside or work in the completedproject? A total of 81 persons are anticipated to reside in the completed project. A maximum of 15 persons will be anticipated to work during peak times in the completed project,' , with a total of 25 persons in the workforce. j Approximately how marry people would the completed project displace? None will be displaced. is Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None are required or proposed. I Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Assisted living is a conditional use under BC zoning and is compatible with the designation contained in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. All construction will be consistent with the applicable City codes. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 67 middle -income assisted living units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 2 None will be eliminated. r G Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 67 new units will be provided. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height o an proposed structures , not including antennas; what g f Yp p (1 g . _ is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? ., ;x a F Heightis anticipated not to exceed 25 feet b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The view will change to a two-story building over a parking garage. a Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. - Landscaping will be used to soften visual. impacts with an emphasis on appearance from SR 144 (Edmonds Way) frontage as entry to the City: IL LIGHTAND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the :proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting of parking and grounds will be consistent with multiple family development; vehicle headlights will produce additional light. All such -occurrences will be during non -daylight hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or;interfere with views? All stationary sources will be shielded from impacts to off -site properties and no such hazard or view interference is anticipated. G What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing lighting on adjoining lands and vehicle headlights on adjacent thoroughfares provide sources of light, but impacts are judged to be minimal. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, ifany: All building exterior lights will to be shielded and directed toward the interior of the site and will be comparable to that on surrounding developed properties under the same zoning designation. 1Z RECREATION , a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City parks and Puget Sound are located in the immediate vicinity. 10 t, • ,- f r t b. Would Ilse proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe No such uses will be displaced. G Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No such measures are either required or proposed. 13. HISTORICAND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no places or objects listed on, or proposed for local, state or federal preservation registers on or near this site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of Historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to exist on or near the site. a Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION e Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for rirnn nff anri n;AY ..., —4— —A —:A-+& - - 4 f ( h ft r j y S %'tS ..., r..... k,....�.,.u..«.,.«,,....,....,......u...wvvcvwf,4a�ki9'�> .ervwsee•w G How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? A total of67 parking spaces is proposed. An estimated total of 12 parking spaces will Z be eliminated. m g i d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? Ifso, generally describe (indicate whetherpublic, U o$ orprivate). N 0' LU None will be required. Cn_ w e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicM4 o) water, rail, or air a transportation? If so, generally describe. Ca a The project does not depend upon, or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail or U; air transportation. Z_ Ff`: Z f Y pp Y g Y P p j f Z E.:� How man vehicular tri s er day would be generated b the com leted ro ect7 I S �I known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. d p Extrapolating from data for Elderly Housing • Attached contained in ITE Trip �= Generation (5th Edition), the 67 units of assisted care are estimated to generate LU = u approximately 220 AWDT at a rate of 3.29 AWDT per unit. At a rate of 0.11 trips u- p'{ per unit, 7 p.m. peak hour trips will be generated. Although the existing 9,500 square Z1 foot office building is vacant at this time, past office usage would generate X'. approximately 234 AWDT with 32 p.m. peak hour trips. Accordingly, total traffic F� tom- to be generated by the completed proposed project will be less than that for potential Z use of the existing building. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation Impacts, if any: In the absence of an increase in traffic impacts, compared with the existing potential use, none are proposed. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a Would the project result In an increased need for public services (for example:,Jire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will utilize existing fire protection, police protection, public water and sewer services available to this area. Health services are available from numerous clinics and medical offices in the vicinity. � r 12 771 Y kkY rss 5��3tX c S i 4 r�r�r"..k22uu�as��3�ss��',�'i{t „zY,ee t f rl Y t } y{ is M 3i y '. ..._. ._. ..... .........-....a..o-_w�,»...- .._.. .... (4.............�.......�.�-..._._...,.........:..er,.wowuww*..m+w.-..........................i..._.._�.....-.«. ` �.... «. -:4,rf .. � ....,....«...-.._._ _ _ . � �a Lovell-Saueriand 19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 ®� dN & Associates. Inc. 591 C00) 75-7663 (800) 775-7b63 Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants RECE-J VC1) FAX: (425) 672-7998 OCT 15 1997 October 15, 1997 LSA No. 3684 ` P T CUUMER Mr. jamal Mahmoud, PE & Traffic Engineer Lu . Community Services Department RECEIVED �s Engineering Division cJ City of Edmonds OCT 15 1991 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 ENGINEERING Re: Sunrise Assisted Living Center Traffic Impact Analysis The purpose of this letter is to provide traffic information regarding the proposed Sunrise Assisted Living Center, an assisted care facility designed for up to 81 rooms to be located in downtown Edmonds. The proposed building location is north side of Dayton Street west of Second Avenue. The proposed structure will have 2 occupied stories and a lower level dedicated to parking. The front of the building faces Second Avenue where a circle driveway is located to pickup and drop off residents. The building garage entrance is"located on the north side of Dayton Street at a mid block location. Truck service access is located on the north side of the building with access to and from Second Avenue. Existing Street System The proposed facility abuts Second Avenue, Dayton Street and Edmonds Way (SR-104). No direct vehicular connection will exist with the adjacent stretch of SR-104 which acts as a holding area for the Washington State Edmonds -Kingston Ferry. The other two surface streets will have direct access. These streets provide access to the various commercial sites and residences in Edmonds. A number of the major downtown arterial routes are under the jurisdiction of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). These roadways include SR-524 beginning at the ferry terminal and consisting of Main Street west of Third Avenue and Third Avenue north of Main Street. SR-104 begins at the ferry terminal and proceeds south on Edmonds Way west of the proposed project. SR-104 provides access to SR-99 and I-5. A spur of SR-524 begins on Third Avenue at Main and includes Third Avenue to Dayton and Dayton to Edmonds Way. r t � f ft � 1t Mr. Jamal Mahmoud Trip Generation October 15, 1997 Page 2 The total number of vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project were determined using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 1991. The expected trip generation is based on the number of beds and rooms for the residents of the proposed building space. Traffic is primarily generated by employees, visitors and deliveries. The expected trip generation from the proposed building is shown in Table 1. .k•:n -.'•'4 •.•+: r:.... rYYk`v:$•-:3''i:;.:•Yk*}? 3$;k}tij, Lk�{fixt3w•. 3:} `fiabl�.<:•.f ; '. $:':3••:}k"?SS`•#:r:SYL •x''u:# :•:3i.hw2k\}.:.,:'`;..');:t';:��c;'`,;kF:d<``T.:€>:.,. . i .}.: r -�4.�c>#F,. :?a . Fr:r... .,,xx:#ti':' 4:�:xx'Y.. .,<•::a :' . x...+? L : xr-4Y:f'l:;tw# .. •: �;}.•o tt3;2.3::. t y:.:},.: N:<.•:2i•:' .€.' x•:k.:?'{a-n .rn.Y,f ':^'S$*'# ?.{;.ar3Y2: •}x%.e.. :.: nm: .: vY 33k33,.,:L 23,. yr; ..:v-8}. :. ::>::;:.:.:::::3n}.::}"?'F:,.}:......,.. yf,v::;:y.$-•; ..• .: \.$}x•+5.::$ :.. Y.. : . `3F:x:.}?; ': '•.. w:..-.::4-:;�.?:'... •::x-YY .?.: r3£ : .: #+�:A'r,:{..¢rt»..::.3::,;`.:2#?i:r23;:S::,:<.. t ;••' •}};y}>F .. $. :Y'?3 ,..Yk.+. v: ao'..}:'t,,. •:.:: .:i$+ .,:{:: `:^,:t,k. .t..{•:.: k:?.?}.4;:'#;nd.:$E:�+,::v+i3:`;v-?;.{Y:•}}Y:C':?^.}l:n:?>.:?!;:i$,:i???!;.:1; .......3i: .{"L. : 3h.:: - ti'.}': :..�::n >.�. ,..{. ..{.. �F:'s;?: } ,;:: :?a xFF•.YX;a: i;4» ';...Y:' k•.:t ::xt1.} -.<., .:t.: ,2.. `t. ?.�� "i'ii��."ie .7.Srf::.. frii3:c�:.t',3• ..fi.a}: o:• + <•• �:;,44:,v:,,•.:,..fi:... 21 `': •3. •• 3: i..• € �.... l.,s` '•+ _....ifi• Y.v. Y-:., .q.: ...: .: ::Y �.• •yy.•:•y:: Y,.ti :. .: k�lY• Total Average Weekday Daily Traffic (AWDT) Assisted Nursing Care, 81 beds @ 2.60 ADWT per bed . . ............. 211 Total AM Peak Hour Trips Nursing Home 81 beds a 0.19 ADWT per bed .... . . ................ 15 I Inbound Trips ........:....................... ... ......... ..10 Outbound Trips 5 PM Peak Hour Trips Nursing Home 81 beds @ 0.17 ADWT per bed .............. 14 Inbound Trips ..1. � ... d2, .......... . ................. 8 OutboundTrips.............................I............... 6 (1) Trip rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, Land Use Code 620, Nursing Home. Trip Distribution V)1( The projected trip distribution for the 211 ADD and 14 PM peak hour trips generated by the project is shown in on Figure 1, Trip Distribution. Since trip generation is primarily staff and visitors, most of trip distribution.is expected to be on arterials accessing areas of residential land use. The trip distribution indicates that half of the traffic will access the site via SR-104 U LoveU-Sd Uerland n & Associates, Inc. 7- Engineem Surveyors / Planners/ Development Consultants RECEIVED NOV — 51997 =RING 19400 33rd Ave. W, Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 775-1591 (800) 77n.7AAA FAX; (425) 672-7998 November 3, 1997 EN INC- LSA No, 'AARA Mr. Jamal Mahmoud, PE Traffic Engineer Community Services Department Engineering Division City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: Sunrise Assisted Living Center Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Jamai: This letter is provided in response to your letter to me of October 28, 19971 commenting on the. above referenced project. You state in your letter that traffic impact mitigation is based on fair share costs at a rate I of $269.33 PM peak hour trip. You also reference that traffic mitigation is based on mitigation determined for nearby development. The basis for the traffic mitigation for the Edmonds ' Financial Center was $269.33 per trip, however this number is for PM peak hour trips through the intersection of 9th and Main, where signalization is Proposed. The basis was not total project PM peak hour trips generated by the project. The basis for traffic mitigation should be the 2 PM peak hour trips through the intersection. Edmond's estimated share of the signal is $20,200. The expected new trips through the intersection is 75 PM .peak hour trips. Sunrise Senior Center's fair share is 2/75 x $20,200 or $538.67. - The idpplicant agrees to traffic mitigation for s amount and understands at s y the City and utilized to assist funding of projects within the sphere of Money would be held 6 this ade tands that this impact of this project. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, t;,' ' '"`_" ® L®veZsd*U` erland 19400 33ra Ave. w:, stun 200 Lpnnwoocl, Washington 98036 & Associates, Inc. - (425) 775-1591 (800) 775-7663 Engineers/5urvepors/Planners/Development Consultants { FAX: (425) 672-7998' EN�I��r{tIVG November 4, 1997 LSA No. 3684 Mr. Jamal Mahmoud, PE Traffic Engineer Community Services Department Engineering Division City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: Sunrise Assisted Living Center Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Jamal: .This let ter is rovide p din' response our conversation this morning -regarding -the above referenced project. As we discussed, traffic mitigation is provided for area wide trips within Edmonds and should be based on 8 PM peak hour trips a rate of $269.33 PM peak hour trip. On this basis the fair share traffic mitigation fee is $2,152. The applicant agrees to traffic mitigation for this amount this letter constitutes a voluntary offer. The intent of this voluntary offer is to achieve a determination of nonsignicance for traffic related impacts. It is understood that this money would be held by the City and utilized to assist funding of projects within the sphere of impact of this project. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, z r: o z r, w wI � p v vs' 0 r1 =g Z v o r z M .E icinity and Zoning Map Attachment i File ADS-97-115 c• i rY S �Sj' 't<! T,e 4 S t �; f n -� .'� b.y-� f 3 w 4 r P - tM6, .... l 1>1 S.R. ) 04 r N. DA ri sI a 41 cn .tom a. t v �i 9TH AVE. N. 4p' ca V w a- N Lr 15 \ACINITY MAP NO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SUNRISE we're QDMDIVDS IN S.E. 1 j4 OF SECTION 23, T.27 N., R.3 E.,W.M. CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON .:. x4 r`5 ,t, aak 7 4z�rts{s�R�/ rr � , rt'` s ,�: � ti _. t � s it r ._ t n '>4x a -�� i' '', 1 y iy�} �' S�'d��r��i 1r�4,Z"t � ��4 An � ✓+7Y -.';:, .. .. .• .. ,... ,.... �K,�,7 ..�<� >,� :�x.'t-�+'i�"S 1. �y�fz's c:. rA}�""y5 Xi""'''�i 83•' i r 3% �s� daL J�i �,� j� S-�h�-+yy�y-;�+ 5 �•. . kS�i''.t;•Sdr. .1? M< � "'" RrF1, �,,,.: c> _(t %" „', j I Ar WON I Hsi �j- i as�Er.�ne� .TEAR THAN OCUMENT_ §AYtON SIftT a■ r� o o°e� �l a z �a o who W z) SPCONP ftNuk SOUTH UPPER LEVEL PLAN AZ.Z ® o �� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS THIS NOTE. EC IT IS DUE TO TH.F�.Q' n n IS LESS CLEAR THAN )F jHE DOCUMENT; x 'HIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN 21F Tlog EAUkWV DOOR __ _ MEEK. DAr s--r lag August 29,1997 gi City of Edmonds i 250 Fifth Ave. N Oi Edmonds, WA 98020 us! Re: Sunrise of Edmonds, an Assisted Living Facility —Application for Conditional Use Permit and U. Architectural. Design Board Application O tj ARCHITECTURAL NARRATIVE W EXTERIOR DESIGN, MATERIALS & COLORS The overall design intent is to create a building with as much residential character as possible given the building bulk and size. To that end, almost all parking has been placed under the building in a garage, and the building has been broken down into narrow wings. The exterior forms include multiple bays with small scale gable ends, and building corners, turrets and porches. To further assist in breaking down the building scale, we are using three different exterior materials. These are cast -in - place concrete with architectural reveals at the base of the building on the southwest and east elevations; this material is at garage level. Masonry veneer and a smooth stucco on ENS finish would be used for the remainder of the exterior. Variations with termination of masonry and stucco would be used to emphasize bays and other building articulations. The primary goal with all these materials is to add residential elements and character. Roofing would be asphalt shingles. Windows would be vinyl or aluminum. Colors have not been specifically chosen yet. The intent is to choose colors that will also emulate and recall a single family residential character. Actual material samples and colors will be submitted for approval at a later date. EXTERIOR LIGHTING The following narrative of each type of exterior lighting identified in lighting/sign plan. Landscape Lighting: This will consist of ground mounted low height (36" or less) bollards for lighting pathways and seating areas, as well as ground mounted lights to illuminate some landscape material. Lighting will be incandescent or low voltage. Sign Lighting. See 'Exterior Signs" part of this document. Sign light will, be ground mounted directly in front of sign, directed up and back onto sign. Lighting will be fluorescent or H.I.D. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL CARE COMMUNITY 414 OLIVE WAY SUITE 500 SEATTLE WA 9NI01 (206) 623 3344 FAX (206) 623 7005 1 19400 33rd Ave. W.. Suite 200 ® Loveil.Suuerland Lynnwood, Washington 98036 ® 0- (206) 775.1591 � ® ® 4%*'Jb %;L;A Mb, I21C. (800) 775-7663 Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants FAX: (206) 672-7998 August 29, 1997 LSA Job No. 3684 Mr. Jeff Wilson Current Planning Manager City of Edmonds 135 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Sunrise Assisted Living Facility Conditional Use Permit Application Dear Jeff, On behalf of our clients, Sunrise .Developments, we are submitting herewith the Conditional Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted living facilities for seniors located on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and Dayton Street. The proposed development is essentially the same proposal we met with you and City staff on at our preapplication meeting a few months ago. The facility is a two story assisted living structure over an enclosed garage. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two handicapped spaces at the main building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the garage (2 handicapped spaces) and 6 open parking spaces off the shared existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average age of 84 years and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will contain an Altzheimers unit. We have previously submitted a Critical Areas Checklist for this site. The site contains no wetlands, streams, steep slopes or geologic hazard areas. The conditional use permit application is comprised of the following list of materials: 1. Application form 2. Site Plan, 1"=20' and 8 1/2" x 11" reduction 3. Environmental Checklist 4. Public Notice Address List 5. Vicinity Map 8. Architect's .Narrative Statement on Design and Exterior Treatment 9. Building Elevations and Site Cross Sections 10. Building Floor Plans 11. Narrative Statement on Conditional Use Permit Criteria 12. Application Fee ,r P'll LEGAL DESCRIPTION AT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST. QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AND DAYTON STREETS IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS; THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1 18'22" E, A DISTANCE OF 263.88 FEET, THENCE N 88 41'22" W. A DISTANCE OF 231.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR-104, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND FROM WHICH INTERSECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS S 72 52'59" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND CONSUMING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 27'11", AN. ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED RADIALLY TO THE L LINE, OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; THENCE S 23 25'27" W, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE AND 80 FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE S 1 09'15" W, 80 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID L LINE, A DISTANCE OF 106.83 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 21+75; THENCE S 44 26'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 28.10 FEET. TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+00 AND 30 FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THECENTERLINE OF DAYTON STREET; THENCE S 88 41'22" E, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, A DISTANCE OF 249.74 FEET TO -THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON "Aq� nxh hil}SKfysf r jy2t, ttirr rt Mt r !r3 ti-.. 5 x ri :..ctSi r? ; y+$z�..3x7' F 4^'�' the s { j'L,,r,Nti ♦ t., ,,, {; a 2 un � � i '} y }, ..t .� x t5`y9 +• rj. t tr iT '-nr t°i"r �t ,} :..14 t'U. r.. .., fF - v ,z, 4„a.. _ ,.r c t _ ' ..a .. .. . ;�.,„ •ch ' Fx 1..7 ":F ..a+.,..... . . ,. .4 .:. .. ...r.. ..a....... .. +, ... ...ram.,.... PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING CENTER 1. The proposal is a Conditional Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted iliving facility for seniors located on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and Dayton Street. The proposed a 67 unit assisted living facility development is'a two story structure over an enclosed garage. The underground garage takes o access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing driveway along the �n q north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium rproject. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the W U. main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick LU up visitors and residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two 2 t handicapped spaces at the main building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the LL garage (two handicapped spaces) and six open parking spaces off the shared i U existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an z anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average age of 84 years al and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present LU W during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will o� contain an Altzheimers unit. a U `a of z UJ vy Q ~q z s 'z U)LL O Lu rJ .. ci s�►9F �cflcent�ol�►als MIN! aL' ! -g*42 J%mo ana 14"rcb o 2ad IF14smor RdaresYtado. W^ W 6020 Phctiro� (426) 77 1-0220 PA C: (426) 7'7 1-0221 _ � � FtRAC � To: .:_.) !..- �✓%c max' F�! _. rom: c�rs� y tee. '��• Date 'irans1r11tted:., i j Mo. of Pages:--' (I Ittd1 cover pane.) Reclpdent's Fax Not,2- o Fooslrrfile Equipment: Auton;OVW4 3roup if (2.3, mine.); Group Ill. If thara are any ,problems during tranamlealon Cr documents are rm*olvod Inoom late. call (200) 7T1-02Z0 and peak for. P Qalaaae Rot _ c: rwoapt1*nVano/Mnnheat.d*c F— TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT ** COUNT # 3 *** SEND *** (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT ." 1 206 259 3230 11- 7-97 4:25PM 2'16" 3 To: CiP of Ed w, onds Community Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 1 2 1-5th Avenue Forth . 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 9E020 Prone: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 From: Date Transmitted: 1 No'. of Pages: ? M„ (Inclujdtn /cover page.) ,�;, i�eclplent s Fax �Cor �� Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group 11 (2,3 mins.); Group IIL UA LU If there are any problems during transmission or documents arer received incomplete, please � N call (206) 771-0220 and ask for _0 z Uj m, U , o Re: c:recepticnijana/faxsheetdcc r i tk . :6 .. ... .... .. ... ... .. .. �,� ....,. ,. .. .�, 7!i #i�' trcpn 3 P. L. L. C. ATTOANS Y S AT L A W 210O Wgetake Coma Tbwes • 3601 In(M Avenue , Seattle. WA 9 IM-1686 • (206) 447-M - fax C 06) 447.0215 Phil A. ©Ibreehts November 7, 1997 John Bissell, Associate Planner City of Edmonds 250 - 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Avoidance of Public Comment Period on MDNS by Incorporatiag Mitigation IWO Project Proposal Prior to Is^�uance of Tbr+eshold Determination Dear John. You have inquired whether a project permit applicant may avoid an MDNS whose sole mitigation measure is a trafJlc mitigation fee by paying the traffic mitigation fee through a voluntary agreement prior to the issuance of the threshold determination. After researching this issue and discussing it with you and another one of the attorneys in my offte. I have concluded that an MDNS cannot be avoided in this matter. It is my understanding that the project permit applicant is arguing that he is relying upon WAC 197-11-350(2) to avoid the public comment requirements for an MDNS. However, as we discussed, if this section did in fact apply the project permit applicant would so have to go through the 15-day comment period and public notice requirements of an MDNS pursuant to WAC 197-11-502(3)(b) and WAC 197-11 340(2)(a)(iv). Although it is not necessary for purposes of this issue to determine if WAC 197-11-350(2) applies to this particular action, it should be noted that it is doubtful that such provision does apply. This is because WAC 197--11- 350(2) provides in pertinent part that "[i]f the lead agency indicates a DS is likely the applicant may clarify or change features of the proposal to mitigate the impacts ..." Providing monetary compensation for off -site impacts probably does not constitute changing the feature of a proposal. The real issue in this case is whether the public participation requirements of an MDNS can be circumvented by providing for mitigation prior to the issuance of a threshold determination. Although the reasoning for the heightened public participation requirements for an NDNS are not spelled out in the WAC regulations, it is reasonable to infer that a project that creates impacts significant enough to merit an 1vMNS should be subject to greater public scrutiny than a project that does not require mitigation. Doing an end -sun on an MDNS by providing for mitigation up front does not change the magnitude of the project and therefore the policy reasons Wenatchee Of'ice • Riveftut Center • 1 F.fth Street - SUIW 200 - Wenatchee, WA99867 + (5fl9)662-1954 • Fax (569) 663-im 11/07/97 . FRI 13:12 FAX iM003 John Bissell, Associate Plannner November 7, I997 Page 2 for public participation are no less compelling. If the City of Edmonds tatces the position that this We of end -run is valid, it could essentially avoid the issuance; of all MDNS's simply by informing all its project applicants what mitigation measures need to be incorporated prior to the threshold determination. I doubt any court would find such a practice acceptable. It is true that mitigation measures incorporated into a project prior to the filing of the application for rho project would probably not have to be incorporated into an bWNS. indeed, one of the primary purposes of a preapplieation conference is to advise the project permit applicant how to tailor his/her project to the review process in order to streamline review as much as possible. However, a point has to be defined somewhere in the process where the form of a project em no longer be rearranged in order to avoid environmental review. As evidenced by WAC 197- 11350(2), alterations of a prvj=t in order to avoid the public participation requirements of an MLiNS are not acceptable ai%r the submission of an environmental checklist, which for most cities stitch as Edmonds is the time of filing of a permit. Policies of the Mate Environmental Policy Act would be best served by defining the point of permit filing as the time when a project can no longer be altered for purposes of avoiding public participation requirements. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call, very truly yam. ©GDEN MMRY WALLACE, P.L.L.C. IV Phil A. 01brechts FAO/idh FA017M.1t110W.150.0M/B4UOfi.1300G4 I 1 t '4f F*+ it J.y x'l s A j F '11 11 M1. ........Pi y - Sitl4 t :7 'C 2 L.-: f 7 t } 1:'r �s t6 E s+� N 1 FS ..c kr z? .t f s -,,A ?;,'tf,, i 7 1'yt5 f pFr .: its7t l Y •as ^,7 *i`' i �C+, .�. t.f �" FtJftlf . iskSI { .!`}{:a«.�.:.{�. 1110411997 `11:50 286 -7990 (.OVELL PAGE 02 19400 33rd, Ave. W.. Suite 200 �AYtl ll SCtLi+p?�� 1Ct 7nnvmofl; Wctshington 98036 - «2}„5.��9� ��s® >Ar �s AW16Cddt4S9 InC. (800)775�7603 Enp{nc'e mr ii+�v6Vu{Att9anUatS�Aev4fOpunaatt on8uttcmts F,A}C;`(425) b92-7998 t- - November 4, 1997 LS,A, No. 3684 to o, Mr. Jairial Mahmoud, PE to p Traffic Engineer � dui 1?, Community Services Department cn o Engineering' Division "' City of Edmonds 121 Sth Avenue North LL 4 � T. Re: Sunrise Assisted living Centerz t- Traffic Impact Analysis z t-, LU w Dear Jahtai: aThis letter is provided in response our conversation this morning regarding the above referenced project. r U. u.,p As we discussed, traffic mitigation is provided for area wide trips within Edmonds and should be based on 8 PM peals hour trips a rate of $269.33 PM peak hour trip. On this basis the fair Share Ftraffic 'mitigation fee is $2,152. The applicant agrees to traffic mitigation` for this amount this z letter constitutes a voluntary offer. The intent of this voluntary offer is to achieve a determination of nonsignicanee for traffic related impacts. It is underattood that this money would be held by tht City and utilized to assist funding of projects within the sphere of impact of this project. P€e�'tse cal I me with arty questions. Sincerely, i A Dale 8. Watkins, P.E. cc Jim Miller, DEA i': �f ,10 ID LL tnc.18gv CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant November 5,1997 Mr. Dale B. Watkins, P.E. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates I�4 f_v :53a; -Avc-Vi : iravv' Lynnwood, WA 98036 Re: Traffic Mitigation for Sunrise Assisted Living Center (ADB - 97-116) Dear Mr. Watkins, The purpose of this letter is to determine the traffic impact mitigation for the proposed project. The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Lovell-Sauerland & Associates for Sunrise Assisted Living Center has been received and reviewed by City Engineering staff. The report indicates that fourteen PM peak hour trips will be generated by this.proposal. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8 PM peak inbound trips and 6 PM peak outbound trips will be generated. Nearby development created in 1996 has xx PM peak contributed fair share costs at a rate of $269.33 per PM peak trips. Applying this figure to the proposal's generation numbers yields a fair share contribution of $2,154.64 (based on 8 PM peak inbound trips). This money would be utilized to the city fund transportation improvement projects within the sphere of impact of this project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Jamal Mahmoud at 771-0220, extension 328. Sincerely, 11-06-1997 3:38PM FROM DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 259 3230 P.1 D"ID EVANS. AND ASSOCIATES, 'm tTrb: 3 !Marine Viow Drive, suite C Evong wkhintton 98201 Ta$ xo6.zYgse9g Fax: 206.:59.)AJD November 6, 1997 Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner Edmonds Planning 121 Fifth Avenue N., 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 SUBJECT: SUNMSE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CU 97o115) Dear John: On behalf of our client and the applicant for the aforementioned application, Sunrise Development, Inc., we are hereby formally amending the application to include within the description of the project the voluntary offering of traffic impact mitigation for the traffic generated by the project to the City of Edmonds in the amount of $2,152.00. Tho ADD, Conditional Use Permit and Building Permit approvals for this project shall incorporated within the description of the project the payment to the City of Edmonds of this traffic impact mitigation. This We understand that no other appropriate mitigation for any identified significant adverse Impacts have been Identified by the City In review of this project. By incorporating this voluntary offering into our project description, we believe an MDNS is unnecessary, as per the provisions of the SEPA Guidelines, WAC 197.11- 350 (2).. We look forward to review of your threshold determination on October 31, 1997. Sincerely, DA VI'D lEVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. d� Jim ilk Planning Consultant M a Dave Sigh, Billy Shields, Don Doman, Kraig Campbell, Dale Watkins • .a. DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, tys6 West Marina View Drive, Suite C Everett, Washington 982ot T& 2o6,259.4099 Fax: io6.2S9.323o November 6, 1997 NOV 10 fqq? pL�tu�uue� t7��p� Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner Edmonds Planning 121 Fifth Avenue N., 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 SUBJECT: SUNRISE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CU-97-1157 Dear John: On behalf of our client and the applicant for the aforementioned application, Sunrise Development, Inc., we are hereby formally amending the application to include within the description of the project the voluntary offering of traffic impact mitigation for the traffic generated by the project to the City of Edmonds in the amount of $2,152.00. The ADB, Conditional Use Permit and Building Permit approvals for this project shall incorporated within the description of the project the payment to the City of Edmonds of this traffic impact mitigation. This We understand that no other appropriate mitigation€or any identified significant adverse impacts have been identified by the City in review of this project.. By incorporating this voluntary offering into our project description, we believe an MDNS is unnecessary, as per the provisions of the SEPA Guidelines, WAC 197-11- 350 (2).. We look forward to review of your threshold determination on October 31, 1997, Sincerely, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. { Jim iller La Planning Consultant GM c: Dave.Sigl, Billy Shields, Don Doman,, Craig Campbell, Dale,Watkms , { �` ... � •y.' %, ,. '- c .., r {�;f { r �!{ ./... j. ("t Alt '7`.. ..y ..Sf Jt ^.�.)!}�. � .. IF SITIAIR ar DAVID EVA,NS ,AND ,ASSOCIATES, October 10, 1997 Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner City of Edmonds Planning 121 Sth Avenue N., 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 SU=Crn SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING CUP (CU.97-115) Dear John: i+iB Nta. Merin. Wow Dliv., cute C Swwu. VMtbinR�an q1■a. Tdt 4*2$0 {c9,9 Fax: 4,254 o'llp u- In ftilterance of our conversation of yesterday, we are hereby formally requesting that you schedule a d preliminary review ofthe currently incomplete application for the atbremealloncd project for informal review by rthe Architectural Design Board (ADB) on November 5, 1997. We recognize that we will have to return to the ADB for formal approval following expiration of the SEPA appeal period on the threshold determination � (MDNS) for'this project. As mentioned in my earlier memorandum to you, this will allow us to utilize any ua wt feedback from the ADB in addressing issues that may arise during our neighborhood meeting, V vsj We also Formally request that you schedule this application for public hearing before the Nearing Examiner in A e December of 1997, We realize that you hre unable to notice the public bearing on this application prior to w W1 expiration of the SEPA appeal period; however, if you could reserve a place on that agenda for this application, rt IT =i pending expiration of the SEPA appeal period, we would certainly appreciate that. We will be making the u. 151 submittals to make this application Complete consistent with your letter of September lei, 1997 on Wednesday, zl, October 15, 1997. We understand that this will allow you to complete the necessary internal review by October 24,1997, and issue the MDNS by October 31,1997. This should allow the expiration of the SEPA appeal period o r - in time to notice a public hearing before the Blearing Examiner in .December. z We will work with you to ensure the most timely response on this application. One of our objectives for the neighborhood meeting is to shave enough information to minimize the chance of a SEPA appeal. Your consideration and assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. It would be most helpful in communicating with the Suariee administration if you could provide us a brief letter concurring with the schedule requested heroin, subject*to the necessary caveat regarding a SEPA appeal. Please contact me with any questions or conamcros. Thank you. . Sincerely, 1DAVID EVAlNS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 0 t ind Miller Planning Consultant ism ® 1 c: Billy Shields, David Sigi, iron Diilman, Craig Campbell Y{,t 1 0 Lk 1. (• R } l 1 S } SS 4 TN F h 7 r'dal t 5 yT.:41(v.�1:RkKtutCnu'.ea.xcn+W1�.✓uww+uro..nw..�. .ni ..r. ,. a1.wv,.. ...,-, .,....._..�.......v..vxlciYYM["anV.YVl4'u.'!LWtiV4.t�'l6Y.Wt»idrfk431 ..«.-.Jr.r. � .........,....1 .w.w....,..? ........... .. .. 'CITYOFEDMONDSENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND z i L Name of proposed project, if applicable: ; Q Sunrise Assisted Living Conditional Use Permit J V1 v® CO mil' 2. Name of applicant: wt m LL Sunrise Development, Inc. 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: U. j sea Applicant: Mr. David Segl Contact: Anthony Roth Sunrise Development, Inc. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. , z 1420 Fifth Ave., Suite 2200 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite 200 ` O ' Seattle, Washington 98101 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 LU z W Telephone: (206) 224-2881 Telephone: (425) 775-1591 � o' ON 4 Date checklist prepared: _ August 29, 1997 _ h- F,: LL 2} S. Agency requesting checklist: ui tn? !`{ City of Edmonds o z 6. Proposed tinting or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is anticipated soon after granting of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this ' proposal? If yes, explain. None beyond construction of a 67 unit assisted living facility, parking garage, outside parking and utilities; Y g h'zP gg g: P g 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Conditional Use Permit Site plan 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly s affecting the property covered by your proposal? "If yes, explain. Neither the applicant nor contact person know of any such pending applications, beyond the instant application. i k ,. � ;itrti d 2F l �a-tip tt{� ,. 4j�� tt ta,.., da'C an ,.. ..., � ^ci ✓✓.t-. �,�Tp:'` 't _" .. . ,.... v a . +,Y p-'.4 «_..._w..«_. ,. i.��. .. ., .. ... .... _.....__..._-...-......_._.......w«..eu.ndt�.�v"fP.RhXG',LetTM✓�'.' 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, f known. Conditional Use Permit Approval -City of Edmonds IL Give brief, complete description ofyour proposal, including the proposed use and the size ,af the project and site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal, You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The requested CUP is to allow for construction of a two-story, 67 unit assisted living facility over an enclosed garage. A total of 67 parking spaces, including 4 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The existing vacant 9,500 square foot building will be removed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, rf known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of lite side(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity Wrap, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate Wraps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The instant proposal is located west of the ferry holding lanes (SR 104), east of 2nd Street and north of Dayton Street in the City of Edmonds; in the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., Edmonds, Washington. A legal description and vicinity map are included in the instant application. TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one): j&t rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. - The development area is a flat paved area and building occupying approximately 44 percent of the site. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The development area on the site is flat. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? Ifyou know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note ® any prince farmlanrl, The development area of the site is paved and based on soils classification mapping presented in the Soil Survey of Snohomish County, Washington (USDA Soil Conservation Service), the site's soils are classified as Urban Land: O J,, 2 Tim s 3. WATER ra Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including ,year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None in the immediate vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans The project will not require work in or over any surface water body. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material, No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from any surface water body as part of this project. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are planned as part of this project. S) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge No discharge of waste materials into surface water is proposed. b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water wiq be withdrawn as part of this project. �9 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 4 The wastewater collection for the proposed project will be provided by the City of Edmonds., No domestic waste material will be discharged into.the ground. as Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, f any (include quantities, if known). Where will this `water flow? Willthis water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The principal source of runoff will be rainwater and snow melt from the roofs and parking areas on the site and discharge will be to existing receiving facilities.. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe - A typical component of stormwater from roads and parking areas is petrochemicals and the products of internal combustion engines. Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and discharged to existing facilities, consistent with current uses. FMaiI lO LW W Lu. z c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near, the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to exist on or in the vicinity of the site. d Proposedlands caping, ping, Use 0 f native plants, or ofher'measures to preserve or. enhance vegetation on the site, if any.: New landscaping will be provided with an emphasis on appearance I treatment the frontage along SR 104. S. ANIMALS a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the she or are known to be on or near the site: L birds.- hawk, heron, eagle, son other. typical small: northwestbirdSand seabirds mammals.- deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. none fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. none. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites No'threatened or endangered animal species are known to exist on or in the vicinity of the site a Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The subject property is not known to be part of a migration route. d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. No such measures are proposed. 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES � a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove; solar) will be Used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc Electrical energy will be used for fighting and appliances and natural gas is available for space and water heating. 6 �t [ '� r rj S 1 �� s14V 3'+T -h:: �R�w "' i •�'xf }, iizt�'�,�� ,y�c x ��. � '� i .-'7 4.+ �q'•t��,�j §i� ��j��M� �� t .n �rW�'N.h,�n tlx.�+�T, i . + � ! ..) �t r ti �5i �J�K�{` S r ! r r '• � tL 1 t+i f'1y � t � Y � .....:. .n , ... ,. ...r m..o......,..,:....W..,�.::.�,.._.._............�...a...w...,..n..wm+s..,yar.awxsstnukax.,............u.....,.�..._....�._.....'�".:............o....::......__.. __ ..-. :: b. Would your project affect die potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? Ifso, generally describe. Z No such impacts are anticipated for this project fC. What kinds of energy conservation features -are included in the plans Of this' proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: tnoj. None beyond the new energy code for energy demand, insulation and infiltration. m u► -J Ft w o 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 3 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, U. risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this C proposal? If so, describes - x.. z 1-j F p; None are anticipated. LU � Ff: 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required c3 L o r Standard police, fire and emergency medical.services in the event of accident, fire or suw unusual emergency event. "- z 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. W m ac Meet all City of Edmonds provisions for fire and life safety. O~ Z b. Noise 7 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft, outer)? Noise from traffic using adjacent roadways provide the principal source of noise at the site and the Burlington Northern Rairoad rails are two blocks to the west, but with standard construction, no related impacts are anticipated. + 1 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? ' Indicate what hours noise would came from the site. Short-term: Sources of noise will be construction activity and related traffic and will be limited to Monday through Saturday 7 AM - 7 FM. B ' Long-term: Human activity and related.traffic will be expected to generate noise in the completed project. Noise will occur associated with peak traffic hours of the day. ti 7 -r r-•v°', v cyc'i1 rvt*7 r^ i Pr IN 7 Ctd 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. Short-term: ' Construction activity and related traffic will ,be limited .to Monday. through Saturday 7 AM. to 7 PM.. Vehicles will use -properly maintained exhaust systems, and engines,'will.be turned off whennotin use Long-term: Residential occupation is.not anticipated to result in a significant -noise increase on the site: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently occupied by a vacant office building. The ferry terminal waiting lines are to the west. Across Dayton Street to the south is the City of Edmonds Sewage, Treatment Facility. To the southwest is a bank, within Harbor Square. , To the southeast is the Driftwood Players. To the east, across 2nd Street, is an office building and a condominium. A condominium is adjacent to the north. . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No agricultural uses have occurred in the recent past. c. Describe any structures on,the site. A single -story office building is located on the site. d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures will, be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned BC (Community Business). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Edmonds Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Downtown Activitiy Center, (Mixed Use Commercial). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? There is no such designation of this site. 8 ut x It. Has uny part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. L Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completedproject?.,: A total of 81 persons are anticipated to, eside in the completed project. A maximum;.. of IS persons will be anticipated to work during peak times in the completed project, with a total of 25 persons in the workforce. - y Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None will be displaced. !c Proposed measures,to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:; None are required or proposed. G Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans; if any: Assisted living is a conditional. use 'under .BC zoning and is compatible. with the designation contained in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. Ail construction will be consistent with the applicable City codes. 9. HOUSING a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing: 67 middle -income assisted living units will be provided, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 67 new units will be provided. 10 AESTHETICS a. Wltat is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including. antennas, -what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 9 i 7 J h ytT 1 _ as 5 l a r, .. r :a t •*t (`t7 f p "� j ��. 2i R, L , L :' r r e.r,:4�i 1 t t {Y t 1{ �'X-rh. � - {Ti . i r' r T s �q fit. �x��,..�t�� 't a � Y"ie•51`�k.x. Height is anticipated not to exceed 25 feet d b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?' oc The view will change to a two-story building over a parking garage. v01 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts," f any: 0. UUi =(' Landscaping will be used to soften visual impacts with an emphasis"on appearance _J E from SR 104 (Edmonds Way) frontage as entry to the City. LU 4 .11. LIGHTAND GLARE LL cn a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it Z I If mainly occur? rZ,,j� Lighting of parking and grounds will.be consistent with multiple family development, 5 vehicle headlights will produce additional light. All'such occurrences will be'during, U to non -daylight hours. s ua b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety"hazard or interfere with i— views? u. 21 ui.va^ All stationary sources will be shielded from impacts to off -site properties and no such w X hazard or, view interference is anticipated. z a What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing lighting on adjoining lands and vehicle headlights on adjacent thoroughfares - provide sources of light, but impacts are judged to be minimal. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. - All building exterior lights will to be shielded and directed toward the interior; of the site and will be comparable to that on surrounding developed properties under the j 0 same zoning designation. I Z RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate P vicinity? City parks and Puget Sound are located in the in vicinity.,. r k 10 .f .... �_.... +�.i' titTMinn rd�Y.•{'rfi 3',u,y,+},.r=.�p.u+. . _,.. ..,. ..r. ,. ,.., . 1. ..,..., .. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?. If so, describe. No such uses will be displaced. G Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, f any: No such measures are either required or'proposed. 13. HISTORICANIY CULTURAL PRESERVATION m Are there, any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local' preservation registers known to be on or next to Ilse site? If so, generally describe. There are no places or objects listed on, or proposed for local, state or federal preservation registers on or near this site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific; or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to exist on or near the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building.for drop off and pick up visitors and residents: - b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Community Transit has a stops adjacent to the site.., 11 G How many parking spaces would the completed project have?. How many would the project eliminate? A total of 67 parking spaces is proposed. An estimated total of 12 parking spaces will be eliminated. d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). t None will be required. e Will the project use (or occur in the immediate -vicinity qn water, rail,., or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project does not depend upon, or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If . known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Extrapolating from data- for Elderly Housing - Attached contained in ITE Trip t Generation (5th Edition), the 67 units of assisted 'care' are estimated to generate approximately 220 AWDT at a rate of 3.29 AWDT per unit. At a rate of 0.11 trips per unit, 7 p.m. peak hour trips will be generated. Although the existing 9,500 square < . footoffice building is vacant at this time, past office usage would generate approximately 234 AWDT with 32 p.m. peak hour trips. Accordingly, total traffic to be generated by the completed proposed project will be less than that for potential use of the existing building. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: In the absence of an increase in traffic impacts, compared with the existing potential use, none are proposed. IS. PUBLIC SERVICES a Would the project result in an increased need for public services, (for example: fire, ' protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will utilize existing fire protection, police protection, public water and r sewer services available to this area. Health services are available from numerous clinics and medical offices in the vicinity. 'G 5 ,,Pc:189v � t5iu".'"3k@€".L�.'ffi '%9 ... ,. •. .•. .•.... �uxilY6vaasKAcf�F•.'¢aYnia lw"muo.:.ar':�tM ivr� A. CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 r FAX (425) 771.0221` MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES` DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building a Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant MEMORANDUM DATE: October 31, 1997 TO: Architectural Design Board Applicants FROM: John Bissell, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Architectural Design Board Agenda and Staff Report Your application been scheduled for the November 5, 1997 Architectural Design Board (ADB) Meeting. Enclosed are an agenda and staff report for the ADB meeting. Please find your item on the agenda. A representative must be present for each item, including the Consent agenda. The Board often moves . items off the Consent agenda and onto the regular agenda. If a representative is not present, the Board will not act on the item. Please note the statement at the top of the agenda. You rust obtain sign permits, building permits and an other required _permit from the Building Division in addition to obtaining approval from the ADB. The review by the ADB is not a substitute for review of building permits and an approval by the ADB does not grant construction approval Please carefully read the staff report pertaining to your item. If you find any errors, missing information or if you have any questions, please call me at 771- 0220 before the meeting. It is important that items going to the Board be as complete and clear as possible in order to avoid confusion during the meeting. If the Board does not understand your project, they may not approve it. ARCMTECTURAL DESIGN BOARD STAFF REPORT October 31, 1997 ADB-97-116 PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF_A NEW 81 BED ASSISTED LIVING ELDERLY CARE FACILITY A. ApplicanttProyerty Owner Architect/Representative Sunrise Development Inc. Jim Miller 1420 5th Ave, STE 2200 David Evans & Assoc. Seattle, WA 98101 1716 W Marine View Drive Everett, WA 98201 B. Site Location: 141 Dayton Street. z C. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to develop a new elderly care facility in the BC zone Q; F! district. The facility is proposed with 81 beds. The facility will provide on site ui w; staff and a common dining room. 2 mi a , v cn D. Background: a H 1. Zoning: The property is zoned Community Business (BC). The BC zone allows the cUja proposed use with a conditional Use Permit. 1d- Zi 2. Environmental Review: The proposal requires a SEPA review. The applicant has submitted an Environmental Checklist which is currently under review with the City. v =F 3. Issues: Design of the site, and landscaping have all been addressed by the applicant in Z their proposal, and the Architectural Design Board must determine the appropriateness of the proposal. E. Staff Analysis: 1. Building Design: The applicant has proposed one large building with hip and gable end roofs, dormers and building modulation. The building is "U" shaped, creating a large courtyard on the " westem side of the building. These elements of the building appear to create a consistent theme as f required by ECDC section 20.10.070. (see Attachment 2). a) Materials: © The elevations in the architectural plans indicate concrete with architectural reveals, masonry units, and stucco siding for the body of the building. The elevations in the colored drawings have replaced the masonry units with wood siding. The applicant has proposed an asphalt shingle roof. The applicant has not stated either the type of masonry units or if the masonry is to be replaced with wood. The applicant has also omitted the grade of roofing material. These issues must be resolved prior to final approval by the ADB. ®: b) Lighting: The applicant has not provided specific details as to the type or amount of lighting. A lighting plan indicates some landscape lighting, entry lighting, and garage lighting. The information provided in the SEPA checklist indicates that the garage and entry points to the building will be lighted in a manner consistent with other multiple family developments in the area. �'� r xh� r k . . . . . . . . { 7 ADO.97.116 c) Colors: Dark brown is proposed for the roof while the body uses light tan for the stucco portions, medium brown for the wood portions, and puddy for the concrete portions. The applicant has not stated a color for masonry portions of the building. d) Signing_ The applicant indicates a sign on the sign and lighting plan. However, no specific details of the sign have been shown. The applicant must provide sign details prior to final approval of the sign. 2. Site Design: a) Access 1 Parking: The applicant has proposed a main pedestrian entrance and vehicle drop off point at the mid- point of the lot on 2nd Avenue West. The main parking area will be located under the building with the primary access from Dayton Street. The underground garage has additional access from the existing access easement located on the north side of the property (see Attachment 2). b) Landscaping: The applicant has proposed to nearly cover the site with buildings, as is allowed in this location by the zoning code. However, the proposal includes a substantial amount of landscaping for the perimeter of the building and in the east and west side courtyards (see Attachment 2). 3. Technical Review: Since this a preliminary review, no technical review is provided. E. Compliance with criteria: Since this is a preliminary review, the ADB will not be making a motion based on the required findings. Instead, the ADB will discuss and provide recommendation and direction to the applicant. The criteria are listed, and an analysis of the Zoning compliance is provided. 1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies. The following are some policies from the Comprehensive plan that address this type of development. 2. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance, or the city has approved a variance or a modification under the zoning ordinance. The following table is an analysis of the bulk standard requirements of the zoning ordinance: Buildin Height 25' + 5 for a modulated 25' + 8 for a modulated ' Lot Covera a 100% 26% Setbacks 15' foot street 15' foot street p 10' sides 10' sides Parking Stalls 27 65 Please note that the proposed height of the building is three feet taller than allowed by the zoning code. The zoning code allows a three foot height allowance for elevator penthouses with not more than a 72 foot horizontal cross section. 3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes ECDC section 20.10.070 - ADB Criteria and ECDC section 20.12 - Landscaping. 2 rT ofN�iMtt�b� AD8 97-►t6.. G Recommendation. ' As this :is a preliminary review, the 'Architectural Designs will;not make'a decision on this matter-. The Board is to discuss the issues and make clear recommendations to the Applicant and z¢ to Staff. m g�. Attachments: d 91 4 Vicinity, Map , , = 2. Applicant s drawings LU to. U. tea' LL CO_ �x Z M. 1UA w iLU 'ca r U.. U o _ z - t @. y 3 z f W W M 7 cl: 0 l4i 10 3 ~� W Wj U- ~' 2' U O F' Z Q MUR rid 6�� Vicinity andconina Map ?l.ls nt* iqv tl"\ s :ax. C ss at ",Mu,E;a. w,i ?s-dJ;u�tt ri r k ft l'f I�r'L hysf tJpn h . ,tl. �ssf 4':',..7 k ;L ,t , S x >.i . t -� 1 * f <e ,t e 5. .�„ d� -' �,te,. yi' . tt ?'�i'n }d t aiR ryi Its1s'S ��t1��it.:ta1t ,x z> 1 tlr {1_..rz z.tisj,ztiYtt't sz..F*+-{.�aSfa�,Sri {jit71;£� 5�.r.c/ p v 3t Rt;i��4Tt��'itt,5t-1 { : �<, t f '.'+ 3 Ct f�«F�F'�ii��5�yy 7,<q�k -.. 1 �, j � L 'E;t `r1 f 1 tl� �r �17�i .. � �` S� f f F ; T , -�F � s 1 � � 1 �k ✓;. aQ '� S.R. 104 r U Gl cn LU r� ?NQ ✓� SITE 53 � cn q z Ldl cn z" ¢ a w o! �' cn ca 9-r1-+ AVEa . N. 5 o:: n U. p V Ncn d O� } r t f VICINITY MAP ,1 N0 SCALE 2 Yy s CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR POW kiE IN S.E. 1 j4 OF SECTION 23, T.27 N., R.3 L.W.M. r CITY OF EDMONDS SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON Ai fl, Er.R.�,�°:�l jr I r �s: na ur X A Ii II�O I! "01100 'i Ovl 0'� " ©IO©_II ��1 6 001100 1Di �,� C-i vo EAR THAN CUMENT. PAYTON SI*Ot sp Ems' L � 10 sp jo¢ aertm xamxo uwe9i LE{ °'�i 1 F • s Z.; ;' I � �iTiif�) �� 0�./�M �ote•�f i� � ��Mw T.i.:� WEST ELEVATION FAST ELEVATION e W ■it .iiuIFm mFiuii_L�ir►�iWIN,. 3■ Wa" HS NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION Raw - za s BUILDING/SITE CROSS SECTION w 7 SEE BELOW oaxeR i01YGR eemxo � O W - q � �—'®'N.RIYOY'A1:SW� xe�oxr or ROOr GnuawneLe � z W -;�'-� enve xeiext .b -�SPRx6TCWF� �- 4 1e9 rLOOR n--n ..... _-------- --..._ SECTION DETAIL AIX wN .�� - « � w gym_ . ¥ �� a _._,_em_ ,__m_. .: T� »»»m< m of z '' , .-�� r � f Cx �i'&. u.yh �� N i"'. i�� ;, � r .,�,�s,��4C}Q`✓t t'jon +�}iN S. . ;$'tfi ti'i"n�' t`(. E4 `�v;,ytr ';r s k ++4r � �� #�7r�'�.�5 i4 Tt}`t E�''x" y t e y '1 = a},r:.Yr 5��....sr y{{ 5 _.j�di �, t �. �i ✓ t p'�° i 1yq+ < a �>t (� i &r 1t} }fih ku Yz rsr 7GG .t q�lY W1,11 DAVID EVANS AND, ASSOCIATES, October 22, 1997 Jyi6 West Marine z °Q View Drive, Suite C i t— Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner 4 X Edmonds Planning Everett, Washington 982ot LLi �t 121 Fifth Avenue.N., 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 Ter: 4=5.=59 40s9 LLI J SUNRISE COI fiat: 425.259.3-130 cn U. SUBJECT: DrrIONAL USE PERMIT (CU-97-115) "' Dear John: .U. 3 In response to our meeting on Wednesday, October 15, 1997, we are transmitting herewith copies of revised plan sets with the revised height calculations per our discussion. We are providing eight complete sets of the revised Z . + plans for your use. We look forward to the ADB meeting on November 5, 1997 to have our preliminary review OI, on this application. As noted previously, we will then be holding a neighborhood meeting to familiarize our neighbors with the project, obtain any comments or concerns and answer any questions we can for the neighbors. LIJ � of We will apprise you of the results of the neighborhood meeting. N We also wish to confirm that the review period for the application will close on October 29, 1997 and that you will be issuing the SEPA threshold determination by October 31, 1997, consistent with our earlier discussion. Again, Sunrise is most interested to a December public hearing date on the CUP, provided no SEPA appeal is tom,_." z fled. Your assistance in facilitating this hearing schedule would be greatly appreciated. v Sincerely, r_ ZZ DAVID EVANS AND ASSPCIATES, INC. 5T Miller and Planning Consultant •�: JGM c: Dave Sigl, Billy Shields, Don Dillman, Craig Campbell Attachments o, 1V .1D fir i - .. r...$ISIAIR Off, a �ta'�? x l y ,� 4. 1 ifF 4 fit.-w •. t ,� '� h]f� } ''s'� t t t N' lk h 7 x r. h t i r 7 ! Y -Y } DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, October 15, 1997 17s6 West Marine • View Drive, Suite C Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner Edmonds Planning Everett, Washington 98201 0 1 121 Fifth Avenue N., 2nd Floor o? Tel: 425-259-4099 �; Edmonds, Washington 98020 w_. hFax: 425.2S9.3230 U. SUBJECT: SUNRISE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CU-97-115) O 'L Dear John: . In response to your Ietter of September 26, 1997, we are transmitting herewith copies of revised and additional application materials to make the aforementioned application complete. The application materials being submitted include: 1. Color copies of building elevations (8 copies) 2. Large format landscape plans (8 copies) 3. Height calculations plan utilizing site plan (8 copies) 4. Traffic analysis report prepared to City and WSDOT standards (8 copies) 5. Revisions to entire set of building and site plans with parking stalls dimensioned and orientation of external two parking stalls in the northwest corner reoriented for more appropriate access in and out of those spaces (8 sets) In addition to these plan additions and revisions, we have the following clarifications and responses to the other items raised in your letter: SERVICE VEHICLES: The type of services vehicles making deliveries to the Sunrise facilities will be step van trucks. These vehicles will unload from side and rear doors. No more than two deliveries -per day at a maximum are anticipated. These vehicles can easily maneuver into the unloading area indicated without backing into that area from the Second Avenue driveway. You will note that the pavement area for the service vehicles has been extended further west to allow additional maneuvering room for the step vans. No tractor/trailer truck deliveries are expected. GATED GARAGE DOORS: The gates for the parking garage will be open for all visiting hours. Employees and local police and fire personnel will have access to open and close garage door gates. This will be demonstrated with construction plan submittal documents. PARKING STALL ACCESSIBILITY: As noted hereinabove, the two external parking stalls in the northwest corner of the site have been reoriented for ease of access from the driveway along the west side of the building to the north. This reorientation will also facilitate backing out of these parking spaces to allow exiting from the driveway on Second Avenue. ME M�6 Eg P SiTIAIR 0A r �,-- li uu F W u. D ti Z W c� 0 a W W v F- O Z G DAVID ,EVANS AND October 10, 1997 Mr. John Bissell, Senior Planner City of Edmonds Planning 121 5th Avenue N., 2nd Floor Edmonds, Washington 98020 SUBJECT: SUNRISE ASSISTED LIVING CUP (CU-97-115) Dear John: 1726 West Marine View Drive, Suite C Everett, Washington 992oi Tet: 425.259.4099 Fax: 425-2S9.3230 In furtherance of our conversation of yesterday, we are hereby formally requesting that you schedule a preliminary review of the currently incomplete application for the aforementioned project for informal review by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) on November 5, 1997. We recognize that we will have to return to the ADB for formal approval following expiration of the SEPA appeal period on the threshold determination (MDNS) for this project. As mentioned in my earlier memorandum to you, this will allow us to utilize any feedback from the ADB in addressing issues that may arise during our neighborhood meeting. We also formally request that you schedule this application for public hearing before the Hearing Examiner in December of 1997. We realize that you are unable to notice the public hearing on this application prior to expiration of, the SEPA appeal period; however, if you could reserve a place on that agenda for this application pending expiration of the SEPA appeal period, we would certainly appreciate that. We will be making the submittals to make this application complete consistent with your letter of September 26, 1997 on Wednesday, October 15, 1997. We understand that this will allow you to complete the necessary internal review by October 29, 1997, and issue the MDNS by October 31, 1997. This should allow the expiration of the SEPA appeal period in time to notice a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner in December. We will work with you to ensure the most timely response on this application. One of our objectives for the neighborhood meeting is to share enough information to minimize the chance of a SEPA appeal. Your consideration and assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. It would be most helpful in communicating with the Sunrise administration if you could provide us a brief letter concurring with the schedule requested herein, subject to the necessary caveat regarding a SEPA appeal. Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, p SITIAIR Off, Lm r S fa,3 st y y} rt gk 5 4r 11 i tJ {G� s t I 5: 10-08-1997 11t23AM FRDA �DAVID EVANS ASSOC EV 206 259 3230 P.1 DAVID EVANS ANIO ASSOCIATES, 016 Wett M94" Wow Drim Sritt C MEMORANDUM �y �,' uvtntL �wAtngwn gatat 1 CAI0: 70: John BissellLuf its•=ss•+4�s ? FIRM: City of l=d nds Planning .-J H: Am�+1=39l=.io W u. ;:Rom.,Jim Mil "u DATE: October 8, 997 2 g g SUBJECT: SUNRISE EDMONDS CUP (CU47.116) PROJI. It: COPIGG: David S191, bon Oillman Thank you for faxing me a copy of your 9/26/97 hatter to Sunrise regarding the aforementioned application. In discussions with Dave Sigi at the Sunrise address to which you apparently sent the letter, he never received the original. I have Arced him a copy. We plan on submitting the additional information requested in your letter by the end of next week (I Of 17/97). We may be able to submit as early as next Wednesday. The purpose of this memo is to explore processing schedule with you. We are particularly interested in getting before the ADD at their November meeting to get their feedback as soon as possible. We will then be bolding a neighborhood meeting. We feel it is crucial to have some design issue feedback before we undertake that neighborhood Contact. We ask your assistance in scheduling us for the November ADB meeting. We are especially desirous of holding our neighborhood meeting before the holidays begin. Going to the ADB in December will not snake that possible and could significantly hamper our attempt to meat with the neighbors. We are also interested in getting to the Hearing Examiner in December if at all possible. These timeline objectives are exuvmaly important to Sunrise. Please review this request and give me a call at 259-4099. We realize we must perform for you and make the submittal of additional information by the end of next week. Obviously, waiting until the 1111/97 date in your letter would not allow us to get before ADB in November. Your assistance and consideration in this matter would be very greatly appreciated by Sunrise and the consulting team. � �a The overall design intent is to create a building with as much residential character as possible given the building bulk and size. To that end, almost all parking has been placed under the building in a garage, and the building has been broken down into narrow wings. The exterior forms include ! multiple bays with small scale gable ends, and building corners, turrets and porches. To further assist in breaking down the building scale, we are using three different exterior materials. These are cast -in - place concrete with architectural reveals at the base of the building on the southwest and east elevations; this material is at garage level. Masonry veneer and a smooth stucco on EIFS finish would be used for the remainder of the exterior. Variations with termination of masonry and stucco would be used to emphasize bays and other building articulations. The primary goal with all these materials is to add residential elements and character. Roofing would be asphalt shingles. Windows would be vinyl or aluminum. Colors have not been specifically chosen yet. The intent is to choose colors that will also emulate and recall a single family residential character. Actual material samples and colors will be submitted for approval at a later date. EXTERIOR LIGHTING The following narrative of each type of exterior lighting identified in lighting/sign plan. C� Landscape Lighting: This will consist of ground mounted low height (36" or less) bollards for fighting pathways and seating areas, as well as ground mounted lights to illuminate some landscape material. Lighting will be incandescent or low voltage. Sign Lighting: See "Exterior Signs" part of this document. Sign light will be ground mounted directly in front of sign, directed up and back onto sign. Lighting will be fluorescent or H.I.D. �9 ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL' CARE COMMUNITY 414 OLIVE WAY SUITE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101 (206) 623 3344 FAX (206) 623 7005 } M - F i - rt�J +' Sunrise Architectural Narri�We City of Edmonds D/M job No. 96047.50 August 29,1997 Page 2 Garage Entrances, Stair, Service Area and Terrace: These will be wall mounted lights at F'- approximately 8'-0" above grade and will be light fixture type that directs light downward cc 21 vertically instead of horizontally. Lighting will be fluorescent or H.I.D. N p Porte Cochere and Front Porch Lighting: These will be ceiling mounted on underside of Porte CO � Cochere and porch roofs. The light fixture will be types that direct light downward and partially J F- horizontal, illuminating the area under Porte Cochere and porch. Lighting will be fluorescent on Cn � H.I.D. w U. EXTERIOR SIGNS Uji to Monument Sign: There will be one monument sign identifying the project. It will be located at the z H. , corner of V Ave. S and Dayton St. See lighting/sign plan for the exact location. The sign has not iuJpi, been designed by Sunrise yet and will be submitted for approval at a later date. The general w configuration is as follows: Width a, to 10, 0 Height 3' to 4' single side facing diagonally into intersection Lighting Ground mounted lighting directed away from intersection, up and back at sign. u y; G Miscellaneous Small Signs: There will be a variety of small informational signs attached to the building consisting of: uJ N- a) "Address" at the front door. Z b) "Garage Entrance % Clearance" at garage entrances. c) "Service Area" at service area. These signs will not exceed 8" height, 36" width. Please fee free to contact me with any questions you may have: Sincerelv. e 7 J f` .fit i (; X� ® ® Lovell-Sauerland ■ ® & Associates, Inc. Engineers/Surveyors/Planners/Development Consultants Mr. Jeff Wilson Current Planning Manager City of Edmonds 135 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 I9400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (206) 775.1591 (800) 775-7663 FAX: (206) 672-7998 August 29, 1997 LSA Job No. 3684 Subject: Sunrise Assisted Living Facility Conditional Use Permit Application Dear Jeff, ' _ ` On behalf of our clients, Sunrise Developments, we are submitting herewith the Conditional �-- o ' Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted living facilities for seniors located on the UJ w northwest corner of Second Avenue and Dayton Street. The proposed development is e=iF essentially the same proposal we met with you and City staff on at our preapplication meeting oa few months ago. The facility is a two story assisted living structure over an enclosed w LUI garage. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the z 0i ~ �f existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential U- 1 21 condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the Ui N; main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two handicapped spaces at the main z building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the garage (2 handicapped spaces) and 6 open parking spaces off the shared existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average age of 84 years and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will contain an Altzheimers unit. ( -�J We have previously submitted a Critical Areas Checklist for this site. The site contains no wetlands, streams, steep slopes or geologic hazard areas. The conditional use permit application is comprised of the following list of materials: 0 1. Application form 2. Site Plan, 1"=20' and 8 1/2" x 11" reduction 3. Environmental Checklist 4. Public Notice Address List 5. Vicinity Map ® 8. Architect's .Narrative Statement on Design and Exterior Treatment 9. Building Elevations and Site Cross Sections 10. Building Floor Plans 11. Narrative Statement on Conditional Use Permit Criteria 12. Application Fee 41 0 7, A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AND DAYTON STREETS IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS, THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1 18'22" E, A DISTANCE OF 263.88 FEET; THENCE N 88 41'22" W, A DISTANCE OF 231.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR-104, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND FROM WHICH INTERSECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS S 72 52'59" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND CONSUMING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 27'11", AN, ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED RADIALLY. TO THE L LINE, OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; 'HENCE S 23 25'27" W, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE AND 80 FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE S 1 09'15" W. 80 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID L LINE, A DISTANCE OF 106.83 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 21+75; THENCE S 44 26'45" E. A DISTANCE OF 28.10 FEET. TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+00 AND 30 FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THECENTERLINE OF DAYTON STREET, THENCE S 88 41'22" E. ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, A DISTANCE OF 249.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. `�r. :' .' � ... .r � � ..., , ' sr., 1. •�.,.� i '�''`-tt"�xw�S '81� ��'e� � i�.�.�t ��y;.r t'� s M � y� ��r� s ` PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUNRISE ASSISTED MANG CENTER The proposal is a Conditional Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted living facility for seniors located on the northwest comer of Second Avenue and Dayton Street. The proposed a 67 unit assisted living facility development is a two story structure over an enclosed garage. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing drive -way along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two handicapped spaces at the main building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the garage (two handicapped spaces) and six open parking spaces off the shared existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average age of 84 years and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will contain an Altzheimers unit. +C % F-+dlmcaa' cfs Loan .e;ta, s•rerieae. oopartnfene , Btdlsl na-Plannlo�-t3nalnoarina !:C!-3th Avonna "Oh a and Floor =denonds, 9N^ veozo IR"hona: (425) 77-1-022101 FAX: (426) 771 0221 ��►X +C ��/E 8� PAS E ��._. From $"A/ v A✓1 Mate Trarlsmdtted: 17 No. of Pages': 3 Recipient's Fax Wo: eo ;�.�i •- r�,,.� - (7nctud/na over page.) RaoatmRe Equipment: "Automotlo/i 3rcup 1l (2.3 mine.); C3raup let. .., If therm are any problmmO during tranarnlaalon or doournents are received tnonm testa call (200) 771-0220 and oak for : p . pteaae µ Re: o: r+oepdonyenetldxeheet cioo TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SENT ** COUNT # 3 *** SEND *** (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION COMMENT 1 206 623 7005 10- 7-97 2:49PM 1'41" [M3 i��r O CW of Edmonds Community Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 121-3th Avenue North ® 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (4251771-0220 FAX: 77'1-022'1 FAX COVER PAGE To: �Jsxl ju ► ./ From: "J'0m ! (",S�'L�,. Date Transmitted: ?7 No. of Pages: 3 7i3— (including cover page.) Recipient's Fax No: -7ycD � - Facsimile Equipment: AutomaticfGroup If (2,3 mins.); Group III. If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (206) 771-0220 and ask for: Re: 7 0 i9 vreceptionVanalfaxsheetdoc Cocas sty SONWI ces nlepartnsent sun dtesit-ylanraingt-EaQOnarrIns 121 -Mtn Avenaaa IM%Prt(a a and ttiroor udsnatnds. WA !@ ozo a Hoi,eo (42S) �?11-0220 FAX: (425) .T7�1 'O� 22*1 From�%ec�.�.,- lie Date 'rMnSmftted:-! ?�� Wa. of Pages: Itecipaenes Fax Tao:- '2 � +Jr- 'ra^�. s pnctutlgnla cover pass.) Facsimile Equipment: A,utomatic/Qroup 11 (2,3 thins.): Group tit. is It Mere are any prabloma cturinp tranamlaalon cr daournonto are raoalved Incomplete. plleaae 'µ oall (206).77'1-0220 and aeic for. E o:rroaptConVa�na/tia,csM�ft.doo - TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT �k COUNT }} 7T 3 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I.Q. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT. 1 206 258 3230 10- 8-97 3:31PM 2'03" 3 tit I�i i n r � }wf ✓ }}a �- i t ,f rt SCjP��i�s li r{ 1tii t lt. }1{.f `i i .: is ;� - ��, r tx �i,� � �+ � >�'t�J � �`}tt ti � �ir}r a�.� d•R,, � ° �.. . r.. n ........ ..... .._ ....-.....«nw...«�„s °.......�..........'..a.:,....,.,.Nuw,k.-- _ cir'inesr +nareaw+:.i..i.,..w t ..... ..f � . �,:...-,;....�w:w...,....,....+..�. ��....�..._. i Com dies► Ser 64-zes oosmw mont """'"" dtiudddaas-Pdannde�g�-BnSdnmsr!»g i -Slid ^venue 'Horeb Send rw., oir Pi�;nm: (425) 771-0220 /=r4X: (426) 77 1-022.1 �' SAX C C�►OiI� FZ 1�.o®►ta � �. From:" s,wRt Z 4 17ate "i'ransmltced:.- Zr� No. of Pafiros: :3 (lneludine coven pass.) R+eciptent' s Fax J V V 01 Faoaimlle Equlprnont: Auto►ratio/croup 11 (2,3 mine.); 0—up tit. a V) W ; t* thtmro arm any protalemm during trananllmalan or documents are received in=om tatm ul S� �; Mall (206) 7711-0220 and Mate f'or : J � ....�r, P :please t o:raraaptlonVanrMaxaho*Ldao TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE,ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT # 3 **ds SEND*�k NO REMOTE STATION I.O. START TIME DURATION #PA3ES COMMENT 1 206 259 3230 10— 7-97 2'•30PM V 03" 1 3 011 atO of Edmonds Community Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 121 -5th Avenue Worth 0 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Phones:.(425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 FAX COVER PAGE To: A I * A"-&:M Date Transmitted: Recipient's Fax No: ?sl- 323® From �Iw 61.4-sa7u- No. of Pages: 3 (Including cover page.) Facsimile Equipment: Automatic/Group 11 (2,3 mins.); Group Ill. If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (206) 771-0220 and ask for: c:recepUonVana/faxsheetdoc r.� 1hC.18gv CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works •Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plani 0! September 26, 1997 wI Sunrise Development LL 0 1420 5th Ave, SET 2200 ' 0 Seattle, WA 98101 Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO COMPLETE LU YOUR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION, FILE NO. L-!' CU-97-115 Your application has been reviewed but we are unable to schedule it for a public hearing before the ADB or Hearing Examiner until the following items are submitted: 1. Eight color copies of the proposed building elevations. These copies can be partial elevations and can be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper, so long as the elevations submitted clearly demonstrate the colors for all portions of the buildings. 2. Eight large format landscape plans. 3. Height calculations are shown on the building elevations, but are not shown on the survey, or site plan. In order for the City to determine accuracy of the height calculations shown on the site plan, the points used for the calculations must be shown on the site plan. 4. A traffic study prepared to the standards of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division and the Washington State Department of Transportation must be prepared and submitted. 5. Parking stall dimensions must be shown on the parking lot plan. The above listed materials must be submitted in order to make your application complete. However, Staff has the following additional concerns with the application as submitted: 1. Service vehicle access appears to be inadequate. 2. Gated garage door entry might not be permitted as it would prevent use of the parking area by visitors. 3. Parking spaces at the northwest corner of the property do not appear to function. Backing out and turning around to access the exit roadway will be difficult and unsafe. • Incorporated August II, I890 • Sister Cities International - Hekinan, Japan. r 0 • Url L91 0 ■ T, 0 -APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE: ":` CU-07-116 & ADS-97-116 AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING RECEIVED ROUTED TO: RETURNED SEP 08 fig% Engineering 918/97 Engineetin NDMONDS FIRE DEPT. Flre Flre cr 10 41 Public Works 9/8/97 Public Works, Parks as Rec. 9/8197 Parks St Rec.��11` Staff CommeAts: *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE *COId MENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Sunrise Development. Inc. • Property Address t 4 i Davton St. • Date of Application 8/29/97 • Type Conditional Use Permit at ADB ,ADaroval • Hearing Required: Yes x No Date of Hearing (if known) s X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) x APO Ust X legals (Existing & Proposed) 1 Ttle Report Environmental Assessment Vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year occupancy (ADU). X Elevations Dedara6ons (Variance) Petition (official Street Map) X Environmental Checklist X Critical Areas Determination W i T' 101 �APPLICATION'ROUTiNG FORM FILE: CU-97-11�,&�4DB-J%t1fi AND CHECKLIST —,'FROM: ' PLANNING RECEIVED ROUTED TO: - RETURNED j Engineering Engineerine ENCINEERIIYG Fire 9/8/97 - '' Fire Public Works ° 9l8/97 Public Works Parks 8t Rec. 9/8/97 Parks 8t Rec. ` k Staff Comments: CWJFb .4r07&c© Y9-rR9 „f t. ura PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE. *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED , *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Sunrise Develoament. Inc. • Property Address 141 Davton St. • Date of Appiication 8/29/97 • Type Conditional Use Permit ADB Approval • Hearing Required: Yes x No bate of Hearing.(If known) X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x.11) X Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) x APO List X Legals,(Exlsting & Proposed) Title Report + Environmental Assessment Vicinity Map Proof o€ 2-Year Occupancy {ADU) X Elevations Declarations {variance} Petition (Official Street Map} X Envirarimental Checklist , - X Critical Areas Determination n ED] t.. 9 MEMORANDUM Date: September 17, 1997 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator a Subject: Proposed Assisted Care Facility at 141 Dayton St (A►DB-97-116) The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Division has the following concerns: I. How are service vehicles expected to access the service area? . 2. Existing HDPE pipe parallel with 2nd Ave. S. cannot be driven over without additional structural considerations. 3. How is the public to enter underground parking, if entry is controlled by garage door? 4. The City of Edmonds has no provision for compact parking stalls. Because the parking stall dimensions are not shown on the plans, as required, staff is not able to evaluate this aspect of the proposal. 5. The applicant will need to comply with Ordinance 3013 regarding storm drainage. 6. The WSDOT will require that a traffic study be prepared for SEPA. The traffic "analysis" included in the SEPA checklist is not adequate. It is not appropriate to claim credit for existing trips "generated" by a building that has been vacant or underutilized for a number of years. 7. The two proposed parking spaces at the northwest comer of the property do not appear to function. Backing out and turning around to access the exit roadway will ? be difficault and unsafe. The Engineering Division will not be responsible for delays or additional requirements that affect the project due to errors, incompleteness, or omissions in the submittal. The Engineering Division reserves the right to make additional comments and requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project. The applicant will need to comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application, though lacking parking dimensions, can be considered complete for ADB review. CITY OF EDMONDS 7116.DOC ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 APPLICATION ROUTING FORM FILE::— CU-97-1I S & ADS-97-116 . AND:CHECKLIST FFtONI: Pt A►RINING 5EP 9' ROUTED TO:. RETURNED PUBi.IG WORKS DEAL Engineering' 9/8/97 Engineering Fire 9/8/97 Fire Public Works Public Works Parks at Rec. 9/8197 Parks ez Rec. Staff Comments: SE 1. 9 i tro *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT DE CONSIDERED 'Additional Information Required for Complete Application t *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Sunrise Development, Inc. • Property Address 141 Dayton St. • Date of Application 8/29/97 • Type_ Conditional Use Penmit 8t ADB Approval • Hearing Required: Yes x No Date of Hearin g`Of known) X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) X Fee X Site Plan (11 x 17) x APO List X tegals (E)isting &,Proposed) Title Report ° EnvironmentaFAssessment Vanity Map Proof of 2-Year'Occupancy (Abu} .: . X Elevations Declarations (variance) Petition (Official Street Map} X Environmental Checklist . X Critical Areas Determination �41 F RCilli'Efi� i� LIJ twnglneering = '�18�9ra .� �lre!8l9.a i> i ��,Pabticl�l'c�a�ks .� :.Tl8l�a �_ {: Pa "-' " 0 Staff CIO,mments, w� �F LL.< s a : I� PER WHAT, SECTU b! btr '1 z � tGt TSVI'THOUT I o `''Addi�onat tnformaUan Rega�red fat C WW D (n *Additsortat Studies Requrred td .ComK = v F, �z cn �z o~ z C2wner Sct'nrlse Dd teto6i ® PToperty,'Address 11 Da `o Date of AppttcatlOn 124, • , Type " C6ndielonal sO Pere ® Hearing Reiaired es x C X APPiica6on X Fee , x APO List Title Report X `: Efev�t+ons Pefrtfan (OPtaal Si�eet t�aP} X Gntical Areas t�etefmrn�tion t G L41 city of edmonas land use application 11 193 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD 13 COMP PLAN CHANGE 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION 13 HOME OCCUPATION 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMEND 11 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP. 1:1 REZONE 13 SETBACK ADJUSTMENT 13 SHORELINE PERMIT 0 SHORT SUBDIVISION 0 STREET VACATION 0 VARIANCE 11 RESUBMITTAL FILE # FILE# ZONE DATE REC'D BY 24,0- CIA FEES 1 -7 -05�46o(e RECEIPT #—lOi9+ N - HEARING DA 13 HE 13 STAFF [3 PB 13 ADB 13 CC ACTION TAKEN: 13 APPROVED APPEAL# 0 DENIED E3 APPEALED Applicant SUNXISE DEVELOPMD", INC. Phone 61) 224-7881 Address 1420 FIFM AVE., SUITE 2200, SFATME, M 98101 Property Address or Location 141 DAYTON STREET Property Owner E-F.C.A., L.L.C. Phone Address P.O. BOX 1251, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Agent TjM7RE;[,=.qATTFRT.A=. Xq$CC , 3NC, Phone —(425) 775-1591 Address— 19400 - 33RD AVE, W., SUITE 200, IMBNOOD, WA 911a3f; Tax Acc # 232703-4-090-0002 Legal Description attacbed Details of Project or Proposed Use Attached Sec. 23 Twp. 27N Rng. 3E The undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/her/its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to tgis�appficattep. 0 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/OWNER/AGENT LOVELL-SAUERLAND&ASS061ATEt, INC. 018 719, DATE INVOICE NO. ',DESCRIPtION UNT DEDE1CTlON BALANCE c ".Application 8/29/97 CUP job.3684 CV K CHECK NUMBER . TOTALS Dear Jeff, ? F"' On behalf of our clients, Sunrise Developments, we are submitting herewith the Conditional ® Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted living facilities for seniors located on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and Dayton Street. The proposed development is U essentially the same proposal we met with you and City staff on at our preapplication meeting o a few months ago. The facility is a two story assisted living structure over an enclosed w w Ly garage. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the r �. existing driveway along the north roe boundary shared b the adjacent office/residential g Y g property rtY r}' Y J Z condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the N'r main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and o F residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two handicapped spaces at the main Z building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the garage (2 handicapped spaces) and 6 open parking spaces off the shared existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average age of 84 years and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will contain an Altzheimers unit. C*7 We have previously submitted a Critical Areas Checklist for this site. The site contains no wetlands, streams, steep slopes or geologic hazard areas. The conditional use permit application is comprised of the following list of materials: 1. Application form 2. Site Plan, 1"=20' and 8 112" x 11" reduction 3. Environmental Checklist 4. Public Notice Address List 5. Vicinity Map 8. Architect's .Narrative Statement on Design and Exterior Treatment 9. Building Elevations and Site Cross Sections 10. Building Floor Plans 11. Narrative Statement on Conditional Use Permit Criteria 12. Application Fee 0 ,, .... ...... ig, Mr.,Jeff Wilson August 29.- 1997 Pag 2. We look, forward to working with you in the processing of this application. We are interes d C z in meeting with the Architectural Design Board as early as possible to present the plans and seek their comments and recommendations. Please feel free to. contact me, Dave SigI (206- 224-2881, Sunrise Representative) or Don Dillman, (206-623-3344, Project Architect) with a iy questions. J (n LU, Sincerely, W XL -J I- (n U. —0 LU U. Jim Miller 0 C1 Land Planning Consultant z i Enc. 0 CC. William Shields UJ Wi David SigI Don Dillman 0— X z UJ 0 z LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST. W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING. AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AND DAYTON STREETS IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS; THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1 18'22" E, A DISTANCE OF 263.88 FEET, THENCE N 88 41'22" W, A DISTANCE OF 231.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR-104, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND FROM WHICH INTERSECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS S 72 52'59" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND CONSUMING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 27'11", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED RADIALLY TO THE L LINE, OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; THENCE S 23 2527" W, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE AND 80 FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE S 1 09'15" W, 80 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID L LINE, A DISTANCE OF 106.83 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 21+75; THENCE S 44 2645" E. A DISTANCE OF 28.10 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+00 AND 30 FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THECENTERLINE OF DAYTON STREET; THENCE S 88 41'22" E, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, A DISTANCE OF 249.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. sY i i r 2 i ri r a rivf ,��rr /ref rYs r4. F iSrj 4j..i � jf�F ; s yb iCr �� r 4� > P a a 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUNRISE. ASSISTED LIVING CENTER The proposal is a Conditional Use Permit application for a 67 unit assisted living facility for seniors located on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and r Dayton Street. The proposed a 67 unit assisted living facility development is a two story structure over ;an enclosed garage. The underground garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and residents. The project has a total of 67 parking spaces, two handicapped spaces at the main building entrance, 59 parking spaces in the garage (two handicapped spaces) and six open parking spaces off the shared existing driveway along the north property line. This facility will have an anticipated resident population of 81 with a projected average, age of 84 years and a total staff of 25, of which a maximum of 15 are expected to be present i during a peak shift. A portion of the first floor of the residential area will contain an Altzheimers unit. d r NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS HHIS,NOTICE jT I.S wL3UE TO.THF��OUALITY OF THE I C V NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN NOTICE iT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE. DOCUMENT._„ Sena x�aa9n�n w+eei O a 0 _Alq � O L RIG PNNNEIAL � W 6 $kWNP AybNuk soup{ ti GARAGE LEVEL PLAN z:o .EAR THAN CUMEW. pArtOH STWOt im ,c 0IF Z O tl w mruaz vAn 1 PYi�4'IW c44\C A.. CN„A twm� - WRg t.kj�j(n�_ B!E AMNRELTB NMWTIVE POR Amm�owu cxPoxrutron 2,g�pNnae, 6FE MLHIRCtt nAW.trvG FOR nc Acutnoxnt lNPORNAn0.Y W � O � tl W ( p a q W ��___ ua mx -��0re euv OOOp a • '., 0 NOTICE: i i REAR THAN DCUMENi. ® O 1 0 I; i N Ca X s rt tisai iE -- ---- a -------- - ----------------------------------------- - -- --------- - - -- ------------- - ---- - --- - ----- ---------- ------- BUILDING/SITE CROSS SECTION w 7 SEE BEIOW. Q . Q0 W _ p 4 S� ave He1pHT as vetuae oea -------_'� !z +zm 9AIRpiO 6F(E! .-_.___ -- ....--------- SECTION 'DETAIL AR THAN :UMENT. H iF� �� +r`�• . I I tl?,',il DIETERICH MITHUN August 29,1997 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Sunrise of Edmonds, an Assisted Living Facility ---Application for Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Board Application ARCHITECTURAL NARRATIVE EXTERIOR DESIGN, MATERIALS & COLORS The overall design intent is to create a building with as much residential character as possible given the building bulk and size. To that end, almost all parking has been placed under the building in a garage, and the building has been broken down into narrow wings. The exterior forms include multiple bays with small scale gable ends, and building corners, turrets and porches.. To further assist in breaking down the building scale, we are using three different exterior materials. These are cast -in - place concrete with architectural reveals at the base of the building on the southwest and east elevations; this material is at garage level. Masonry veneer and a smooth stucco on EIFS finish would be used for the remainder of the exterior. Variations with termination of masonry and stucco would be used to emphasize bays and other building articulations. The primary goal with all these materials is to add residential elements and character. Roofing would be asphalt shingles. Windows would be vinyl or aluminum. Colors have not been specifically chosen yet. The intent is to choose colors that will also emulate and recall a single family residential character. Actual material samples and colors will be submitted for approval at a later date. EXTERIOR LIGHTING The following narrative of each type of exterior lighting identified in lighting/sign plan. Landscape Lighting. This will consist of ground mounted low height (36" or less) bollards for lighting pathways and seating areas, as well as ground mounted lights to illuminate some landscape material. Lighting will be incandescent or low voltage. Sign Lighting: See "Exterior Signs" part of this document. Sign light will be ground mounted directly in front of sign, directed up and back onto sign. Lighting will be fluorescent or H.I.D. ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL CARE COMMUNITY 414 OLIVE WAY SUITE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101 (206) 623 3344 r,� FAX (206) 623 7005 (t^0 EXTERIOR SIGNS Monument Sign: There will be one monument sign identifying the project: It will be located at the comer of e Ave. S and Dayton St. See lighting/sign plan for the exact location. The sign has not been designed by Sunrise yet and will be submitted for approval at a later date. The general configuration is as follows: Width ±8'to 10' Height 3' to 4' single side facing diagonally into intersection Lighting Ground mounted lighting directed away from intersection, up and back at sign. Miscellaneous Small Signs: There will be a variety of small informational signs attached to the building consisting of: "Address" at the front door. b) "Garage Entrance / Clearance.' at garage entrances. c) "Service Area" at service area. These signs will not exceed 8" height, 36" width. The subject property is designated for Downtown Activities Center, Mixed Use Commercial by the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The existing Community Business zoning is consistent with that land use designation. The proposed assisted living facility, as an allowable use within a Community Business zone subject to the securing of a conditional use permit, is a use consistent with the comprehensive plan land use designation. The site is zoned Community Business (BC) which as the following stated purposes: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishment which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple dwelling unit(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. The proposed assisted living facility will provide a community service establishment delivering assisted living care to senior citizens. The senior assisted care residential activities will occur chiefly within the proposed building, except for passive recreational activities that would take place on the open patio decks of the building. The proposed use qualifies as an allowable use under "Community facilities, as listed in the RM District" (ECDC 16.50.020C.2.), as verified by City staff during the preapplication process. The BC zoned does not have minimum lot area, lot width, street setback, side or real setbacks, except adjacent to R zoned property. The site does not adjoin any R zoned property. There is a maximum ® building height restriction of 25 feet in the BC zone; the proposed building height will not exceed 25 feet. The BC zone limits maximum floor area to 3 square feet per square foot of lot area. The lot encompasses 60,086 square feet. The proposed building has a total of 84,000 square feet, or 1.398 square feet of building area per square foot of lot area. The use will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or to the nearby private property or improvements. The occupancy of the facility by up to 81 senior citizens with an average projected age of 84 years will have no detrimental impacts to public health, safety, welfare < M .1», _..__. .; � ..'---��+�.+�••••W,..a.'`�.asazu.+Y:�ssi3�,i3�4`�Mwr,C;... 4ti�L'�f��i�XCtt'iG.'RwSYAG'G�k:�kYL'�iY,~'tA�tA"s14;Xi#;!wm»xt�'srsae�.�..... or to nearby private property or improvements. This type of;facility is generally considered to be a "¢ood nei¢hboe' and hiehiv desirable land use in commercial and residential neiehborhoods. - }} 3 .... " . _ .......r�, .+..«nrn.4.n.i..r..++.+.�.:4 �... r . .a.... .... "2_. M1 -....".......u,..n..�..i.r«.n......-r..... r...a...-.... 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045.0004 EDMONDS SHOPPING CTR ASSOCIATES OCCUPANT OR GOLDIES OCCUPANT OR THE LACEMAKER 3131 E. MADISON ST., SUITE 202 180 SUNSET AVE 176'SUNSET AVE SEATTLE, WA 98112 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 z 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANT OR CAMERELLI'S OCCUPANT OR THAI PARK OCCUPANT OR HOMESTYLE LAUNDRY • 178 SUNSET AVE 182 SUNSET AVE 4 SUNSET AVE 18 dgI EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 W L)j ol to 01 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045.0004 i OCCUPANT OR OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OR RACEWAY HOBBIES OCCUPANT OR WATERFRONT ANTIQUE MALL G 186 SUNSET AVE 188 SUNSET AVE 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 w to 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 C1 OCCUPANT OR OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OR THE ASSOCIATES OCCUPANT, SUITE 129B L. 192 SUNSET AVE 194 SUNSET AVE 190 SUNSET AVE 2! EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 r Q1 UJL LU{ 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045.0004 232703.1-045-0004 U Lai OCCUPANT OR CITY JUICE & JAM OCCUPANT OR ANTHIS OCCUPANT OR ACCENT DESIGN 190 SUNSET AVE, SUITE 123 . 190 SUNSET AVE, SUITE 119 INTERIORS LWU t7 M EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 190 SUNSET AVE, SUITE 111 U EDMONDS, WA 98020 U. _ - Z 232703-4-080-0004 232703-4-080-0004 232703-4-081-0003 Cwi um)' EDMONDS LUMBER CO. &HARDWARE BARKER, FLOYD & JANET-TRUSTEES OCCUPANTIHARBOR SO. BLDG. #3 01 - 228 5TH AVE. S. 815 9TH AVE. N. 110 W. DAYTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 v 232703-4-081-0003 232703-4-082-0002 232703-4-082-0002 PORT OF EDMONDS OCCUPANT MILLER, ROBIN L. & CAROL 160 W. DAYTON ST. 146 3RD AVE. S. 17358 BEACH DR, NE EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98155 1 232703-4-085-0009 232703.4-087-0007 232703-4-087-0007 ' NELSON, MARVIN R. & LESLIE A. OLYMPIC DRIVE ASSOCIATES RESIDENT ® 209 DAYTON ST., #101 1233 OLYMPIC DRIVE 223 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-089-0005 2327034.0 -0001, 4548-002-019.0006 232703-4-09 0001. 1 NELSON, MARVIN R. & LESLIE CITY MONDS SEWAG T ATMENT PLANT 209 DAYTON ST., #101 250 5 AVE. N. 2ND & D TON. EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDM D , WA 98020 EDMO S, WA ,98020 x} r: 232703-4-092-0000 232703-4-092-0000 23703-4-093-0009 ' OCCUPANT/PINKHAM'S PILLOW B&B AGLOW INT'L LORETTA LIND4r'*+' t' 202 3RD AVE. S. POB 1548 222 DAYTON ST., #3,- EDMONDS, WA 98020 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 EDMONDS, WA' 98020 �s j. pv . . - : :' „;• ... .... , ''fit.. , . :. , � .. . ., k y z3t�4��i?y�, '�F '�lv � % y �r t � I; i 23703-4-095-0007 4648-002-019-0105, 4548-003-001-0004 �- 4548-002-001-0006 RALPH SORENSEN WA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION ROBERT A HENNING 222 3RD AVE S P.O. BOX 47300 101 JAMES ST EDMONDS, WA 98020 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-001-0006 4548-002-004-0003 4548-002-013-0002 OCCUPANTIALASKA NW PURL NORHAWK INVESTMENTS, INC. LCM 130 2ND AVE S 120 2ND AVE. S. 144 RAILROAD AVE #204 �l EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 0 0? c !: 4548-002-013-0002 4548-002-017-0008 4548.001-001-0008 �! OCCUPANT/OPTIMUM PRECISION RIO PETROL, INC. BROWNLEE, WILLIAM W. & DELORES 110 MAIN ST. 100 2ND AVENUE SOUTH #11 553 ELM WAY ca 0 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Lu u- 4548.001-001-0008 4548-001-003-0006 4548-001-005-0004 S p, RESIDENT TINDALL, THOMAS R. THIRD AVE. PLAZA LTD. PTNSHP. r �1 221 JAMES ST. 126 3RD AVE. S. 2025 FIRST AVE. #1000 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98121 ua ui C3 4548-001-005-0004 4548-001-007-0002 4548-001-007-0002 (j i-- RE§t E THIRD AVE. PLAZA LTD. PTNSHP. 2025 FIRST AVE. #1000 RE T p Uj W EDMO S, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98121 ED ONDS, WA 98020 s ui z 4548-001-017-0000 4548-001-017-0000 4548-001-020-0005, 4548-001-023-0002 V MAR VEL MARBLE, INC. OCCUPANT HOPPER, HAROLD A. & CAROLEE F= P.O. BOX 1449 202 MAIN ST. 530"BELL ST., SUITE 1000 z EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-023-0002 6464-000-001.0005 6464-000-002-0004 OCCUPANT/SEA MTN INSURANCE HELDE, ERLINE A. & M.A. RUST, DOROTHY G. 131 2ND AVE. S. 210 3RD AVE. S. #A 210 3RD AVE. S. #B j EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 M 6464-000-003-0003 6464-000-004-0002 6782-000-101-0009 GARRISON, REV. LIVING TRUST WILLIAMS, DONALD T. & PATRICIA E. JENSEN STERLINE V £T UX Q 210 3RD AVE. S. #C 210 3RD AVE. S. #D 200 JAMES ST., #101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-102-0008 HOOD, WILLIAM B. JR 200 102 JAMES ST. ®- EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-105-0005 HASSON, ROBERT A. & MARCELLA L. 200 JAMES ST. #105 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-103-0007 6782-000-104-0006 TELFORD, RICHARD K. & BLISS,E. YOUNKIN, MERRILL V. & DOROTHY V. 200 JAMES ST. #103 200 JAMES STREET #104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-106.0004 6782-000-107-0003 MCMANUS, STEPHEN WYMAN & HELEN GUTHRIE 200 JAMES ST. #106 200 JAMES STREET #107 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 "},a 7876-000-202-0002 7876-000-202-0002 7878.000.203.0001 ERWERT, WILLIAM RESIDENT' WAGNER, M. JOE 114 2ND AVE. S.'#202 ..; . 116 '2ND AVE. S., �i202 114 2ND AVE. S. #A EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 T, 7876.000-203-0001 RESIDENT 8139-000.001-0006. GOOdWIN, JOY, 8139-000-002-0005 BERGMANN, JOHN G. & SUSAN M. 116 2ND AVE. S., 203 152-3RD AVE, S. #A 162 3RD AVE. S. #B. 1-" EDMONDS, WA 98020" EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8139-000 003-0004 8139-000-003-6004 8139-000-004-0003 TILTON, MICHAEUCHIYOKO OCCUPANT WIGGINS, JACK & KAREN 4 4904 WEST VICKERY BLVD. 150 .3RD AVE. S. #C 152' 3Rd AVE:'S. #D U O W FORT WORTH, TX 76107 EDMONDS, WA 98020, EDMONDS, WA 98020 u. u) 8139-000-101-0005; 8139-000-102-0004, 8139-000-201.0004, 8139-000-202-0003 : 8139.000-101-0005 RESIDENT 8139-000-102-0004 RESIDENT RATELCO PROPERTIES CORP 150, 3RD AVE. S. #101 150 '3RD AVE. S. #102 Z Ff. 1266 MERCER ST_ EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA. 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98109 Lu ut G 8139-000-201-0004 8139.000-202-0003 8139-000-216-0009 u.c1) RESIDENT . RESIDENT MEEKS, JOHN N.'ET AL 0 1- 150 3RD AVE. S. #201 150':3RD AVE. S. #202 15553 HEINTZ'AVE SE EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 MONROE, WA 88272 ., ' StW,1 1— u- p. 8139-000-216-0009 uwj t3.x. RESIDENT r 150 3RD AVE. S. #216 EDMONDS, WA 98020 s. rL�s .. ... ..... .. ..... ........ ... ILI ..,:._...... . e ... ,.. .. ...s;[ .. ... .<.. .. .. _.. .x, 6782-000-108-0002 6782-000-201-0008 6782�000-262-0007 BALLARD, RONALD D. & LORETTA ARGENT, CARROLL B. SEABORG, HAROLD J. & ELLIE 260 JAMES STREET #108 200 JAMES ST. #201 200 JAMES ST. #202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-OOD-203-0006 6782-000-204-0005 6782-000-205-0004 PARKS, THOMAS D. EVARTS, ARLENE F. MEDALIA, MICHAEL J. & GENE H. 200 JAMES STREET #203 200 JAMES STREET #A-204 200 JAMES ST. #205 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-206-0003 6782-000-207.00020 DAVISON, MARGUERITE G. WUSCHER, RALPH i CLUTE CA OL 200 JAMES ST. #206 200 JAMES ST. #207 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-301-0007 HVATUM, ARTHUR R. & LOUISE J. 200 JAMES ST. #301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-304-0004 EDSON PECK TRUST 200 JAMES ST. #304 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-307-0001 STOKES, OPEL LOREE 200 JAMES ST. #307 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-401-0006 FARRELL, EVERETT J. 200 JAMES ST. #401 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-404-0003 HAMMERSLA, WILLIAM D. 200 JAMES STREET #404 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000.407-0000 CARL JOHNSON TRUST 200 JAMES STREET #407 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876-000-100.0005 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S.,#100 EDMONDS, WA 98020 . ... ... ... 6782.000-302-0006 1 BUNDY, VICTOR C. & MILDRED L. 200 JAMES ST. #302 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-305-0003 SCOUGAL ESTATE 200 JAMES STREET #305 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-308-0000 ELWAY, ROBERT 41804 264TH S.E. ENUMCLAW, WA 98022 6782-000-402-0005 BRUNSVOLD, S.K. 200 JAMES ST. #402 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-405-0002 WESTON, G.T. 200 JAMES STREET #405 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-208-0001 KROON, WILLIAM D. & LUCILLE M. 200 JAMES STREET #208 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-303-0005 BAST, WILLIAM C. 200 JAMES STREET #303 ,EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-306-0002 BILLE & LENORE CADE 200 JAMES ST, #306 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-308-0000 RESIDENT 200 JAMES ST. #308 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-402-0004 GREGERSON, BARBARA A. 200 JAMES ST. #403 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-406-0001 GRANT-ELWAY, DOROTHY 200 JAME ST. #406 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-408-0009 7876-000-100-0005 KENNETH & SHIRLEY FARIS MARINER PLAZA 200 JAMES ST, #408 20146 25TH NW EDMOND, WA 98020 SEATTLE, WA 98177 7876-000-201-0003 7876-000-201-0003 TUCKER, RICHARD G. & DOROTHY M. RESIDENT 114 2ND AVE. S., #201 116 2ND AVE. S. #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020