Loading...
141 DAYTON ST.pdf.Cst Ig9U CITY OF EDMONDS �BARBARA FA�HppE�Y 250 6TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771.0220 • FAX (206) 771-022`i IVirR HEARING EXAMINER APR U 6 1999 Pl tWg Old.i DEPT. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICANT: Julie Brockman / NW Care Management, Inc. CASE NO.: CU 97-115 and ADB 97-116 LOCATION: 141 Dayton St. APPLICATION: Consolidated Permit Application for a Conditional Use Permit for an 83-bed "Assisted Living Care Facility" and compliance with the City's Architectural Design Board Design Criteria. (Exhibit A, Attachments 2, 3, 4 and 6). REVIEW PROCESS: Conditional Use Permit: Hearing' Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. The Architectural Design Board (ADB) has reviewed the proposal and has made a recommendation. MAJOR ISSUES: (1) Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.53 (Community Business - BC). (2) Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.05 (Conditional Use Permits). SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION: Staff Recommendation: Approve with conditions Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the application was opened at 10:55 a.m., April 1, 1999, in the City Hall, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 12:08 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan w LL cn i f- z F-, z w 0 a w x t- LL 0 z G Y n i f +1 S - Y Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 2 HEARING COXMIENTS: The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing. From the City: Steve Bullock reviewed the staff advisory report and entered it into the record (Exhibit A). He noted this is a consolidated review for both design and use. He also noted that after the Architectural Design Board (ADB) review of the proposal, the applicant redesigned the roof to provide modulation in accordance with the ADB motion. From the Applicant: Julie Brockman, Applicant, reviewed the proposal and discussed the assisted living concept. Charlie Wright, Johnson Architects, explained the revised plans and said they had attempted to mitigate view impacts. From the Community: Shirley Faris, neighbor, asked questions about the ratio of employees to clients, hours of construction, length of construction, noise, access to the trash area, and deliveries to the site. She also expressed concerns about traffic and parking related to the proposal. Sterling Jensen, neighbor, said he too was concerned about parking (including visitor parking) and had a strong objection to the loss of Landau parking, which now uses the site. He asked where the mechanical equipment would be placed. Merrill Younkin, neighbor, took exception to the view analysis that was submitted with the revised plans. He expressed concerns about loss of views from the El Capitan condominiums and he expressed concerns about loss of parking in the area. Response from the Applicant: Julie Brockman responded that there will be maximum of 15 staff on site during any shift. She also said after construction 24 parking spaces will be provided to Landau and that Edmonds Financial will provide the other 12 spaces. Jeff Saboda, Johnson Architects, discussed the parking issue and responded to questions about the location and design of the trash enclosure. He said construction would take place over a period of 12 to 14 months and noted that parking may be able to be staged on site during construction. He said they plan to locate much of the mechanical equipment in the garage. Dale Watkins, Traffic Engineer, said the use will be a low traffic generator and only 14 trips are expected during the PM peak. He said he doesn't foresee any congestion problem. hx r . _....,.....n,.»,i;.o+w..JrsY;<`sw'?tdYa X^..n...1!ix,69A'3+tt43fx«Partwwuw.,.,..v++uanaPu:Ia!>`_6z.�N."ex+NtWFCtCSv,3�:?:::Q.`i8YL5.'�.lYtsNc4F{ N cvn.rss.iaml,�i aeasbUtik;e:W.`.rM4Y1^..RW4='fFFl.:tRrt F.. \\\ Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: a oil, Two letters, with attachments, were submitted by Karen Wiggins (Exhibits B & Q. She �o expressed an issue about the parking easement her firm (which leases to Landau) has which 0 w! needs to be addressed prior to commencement of construction. i J F` N u. W REVIEW BY THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD The ADB met on March 17, 1999 to review the request and adopt a recommendation to LL the Hearing Examiner (Exhibit A, Attachment 2). The following recommendation for d. approval was made: zI--; Sullivan moved, seconded by boardmember Chalupnil; to recommend o` approval of ADB-97-116 and CU-97--115 to the Hearing Examiner, because the LU UJI Board finds that: we The applicant has successfully met the requirements ,of ECDC section 20.10.070.A.6, that all sides of the building be adequately modulated; z tU a Although the proposal does not meet the requirements of ECDC section U. 20.10.070.A.6 and 20.10.070.C.3, in discussions with the applicant, it 21, appears that it could be modified to meet these requirements, r p It should be noted that the roof as proposed does not meet. the roof z modulation requirements; With these modifications the application is found to be consistent with the. Comprehensive Plan and other adopted City policies, it meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance, and satisfies the criteria in the Edmonds Community Development Code. Motion Carried The Board's major concern was that the ridgeline of the roof that runs north and south the length of the building be broken up to allow for view corridors of Puget :t Sound to the west to be maintained for properties to the east of the proposed building. In discussion between the applicant and the Board it appeared that the applicant could make some changes to their proposal to address the Boards concern. Drawings have been submitted which reflect the Board's request (Exhibit A, Attachment 7). With this design, the Board would recommend approval of the roof as a modulated design. All other element of this proposal met with the approval of the Architectural ® Design Board, including landscaping and materials. " pia n � r Cif �' 1.ti i5tE a r k �Jy3�, 3y"r7+ �l +kR 2, ,-:°k .+, s• s-.:n f k{ �� � 1"rr �s k1t..jj' �.��x � ?p '�i t a t Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97416 Page 4 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS I. A. SITE DESCRIPTION ai) Facts: (1) Land Use: The subject property contains a single warehouse type structure.- (2) Zoning: The subject property is located in a Community Business (BC) zone (Ekhibit A, Attachment 1). Q Terrain and VeaeCation: The site is relatively flat with a slight slope from east to west side of the property. 2. Neighboring Development And Zoning: (1) Fact: The property is surrounded on the north, east and west by the BC zone and �et commercial and mixed -use development. The property across the to the south is the City wastewater treatment plant. ( 2Fact: The ferry ) holding lines are adjacent to the property on the west. B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) 1. -Fact: SEPA is requiTed of any project, which requires 4 Conditional Use Permit. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued November 13, 1997, based on a submitted traffic study. No comments or appeals were received. C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE 1. Critical Areas Corn liance a) Facts: (1) This proposa I is. subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.153 I (Critical Areas Ordinance). (2) A Critical Areas Checklist (CA-97-170) was submitted and the requirement for a study waived. b) Conclusion: The applicant has met the requirements of the Critical Areas Ordinajrice.l 2. Compliance with the Community Business, (BC) Zoning Standards a) Facts: standards pertaining (1) The fundamental site developmentrta'ining' to development in the Community Business (BC) zone is setforth in "W, Chapter, 16.5 020. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 5 (a) Street Setback: 0 feet (b) Rear Setback: 0; 15 feet from residentially zoned property (c) Side Setbacks: 0; 15 feet.from residentially zoned property . (d) Height: 25 feet (up to 30 feet with a 34n-12 pitched roof or an approved modulated design) ut Uonctusion: The applicant has provided a proposal, which complies with the Community Business (BC) zone standards. 3. Compliance with Requirements for a Conditional Use Permit a Fact: (1) Chapter 20.05 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby the following findings and criteria must be meta The criteria are as follows: (a) The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (b) The proposed use, and its location, is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the zone district in which the use will meet all applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. (c) That the use, as approved or conditionally approved, will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and to nearby private property or improvements unless the use is a public necessity. (d) The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the conditional use permit shall ran with the land or shall be personal. b) The applicant has submitted the following declarations with their submittal which address the decisional criteria (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4): (a) The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it is in Edmonds, and it is zoned Community Business. (b) . The project is consistent with the Zoning Code in that the BC zone states as one of its purposes: "To allow for multiple dwelling units(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. (c) The project will not be detrimental in that the proposed use does not put a great burden on surrounding properties or uses. The typical resident will be 84 years old, not drive their own_: car and have occasional visitors. The pleasing look of the building will help ensure that it will not be detrimental to the community. a t t . 4tV r .:. ,. ..,...».ri...�.$w.tiel�.t�iAAri.��.SniYi�.{'i5'pNi.3{23F Y5ikf9Mu4.uu.airove.buyeSYIS'ibSh:tFA45C1`.CE`1114.41!]Sdt'FiYN"...W.'5:A w... ,. "NI03"XfeY.SCh.,Y6CVESWtYU�cYvnwi3uf.A5uL-,s+. •;..,. w..+naunw[�ubnR3i,r#�S:w'KCMGR9iL"StY'iiYxr. °,RS9..5}Y,:7f'.a^. {,t .. a... r Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 6 (d) The applicant has requested that this Conditional. Use Permit "run with the land" and be allowed to transfer if necessary. z c Conclusions: - v� 1 (1) The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is part of the aj I Downtown Activity Center with a Mixed Use Designation. The � 1 application is in compliance with the following Comprehensive Plan w policies: u� w� A.I. "Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient U. pedestrian routes. A:S. Support a mix of uses downtown. without encroaching into C' single family neighborhoods. WLul A,6. Encourage opportunities for new development and —01 redevelopment, which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small 00 town pedestrian oriented character. Existing height limits are =t o ►r an important part of this quality of life, .and remain in effect. , A. Z Provide greater residential opportunities and personal �- o! services within the downtown, especially to accommodate LL; W, needs of senior citizens. cs _, A.M. Provide for the gradual elimination of large and z inadequately landscaped paved areas. (2) The proposal will comply with all aspects of the Community Business development standards of the ECDC. (3) The type of use proposed generally does not generate as much traffic as a typical residential use, and is appropriate to be located in a mixed use area with its potential access to transit. If approved with conditions addressing parking during construction and visitor parking after construction, the use should not be significantly detrimental to the ®. public health, safety and welfare, or to nearby private property or improvements. (4) Staff recommended that the permit be allowed to transfer to future owners of the property. D. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE tli - a Facts• (1).The ADB and. ConditionalUsePermit application 'has' been reviewed l .� and evaluated by the Fire Department, Public Works Division,. Engineering Division, and the Parks and Recreation Division.: No_,, J R 4t {dyy' +i, 1 Y r\.1� "•er ( t i .a. T..,,,ai..hk'xC1k inSw �F� i. F T :taYll�R'.„ '�'r . _ .b r`'fY.. ..�. Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 7 department has any concerns that will significantly change this proposal, b) Conclusion: No technical problems have been identified. j JZy E. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC) 51 a 1. Comprehensive Plan Designation cn u+,' � �° a Fact: wLL u (1) The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as part of the Downtown 2 �: Activity Center with a Mixed Use Designation. The application is in g :3 compliance with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: T) O., A.I. Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient z t- a • � pedestrian routes. 2 ut wj. A.S. Support a mix of uses downtown without encroaching into MI single family neighborhoods. F„ A.6. Encourage opportunities for new development and w ,,+ redevelopment, which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Existing height limits are --: z� an important part of this quality of life, and remain in effect. r r A. Z Provide greater residential opportunities and personal O services within the downtown, especially to accommodate z needs of senior citizens. A.M. Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas. b) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. r DECISION D Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design to allow and assisted care facility to be constructed is approved, subject to the following conditions: (1) The applicant must obtain all necessary permits and pay the required traffic mitigation fee (required in the MDNS) prior to any construction. (2) All landscaping per the approved landscape plan must be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 1 .-,® ,.._. •-<. ;.,�; .. ;- � �.-4si``kk�s,.r-" x� � ���*`�ra� 1k��5'�"� ,`i4n+� �"��� t .. .: .. .•. .... ».7... .,. �,.. ': ,. �::. ... ,. s.! k 4 J ills 4R b y i Hearing Examiner Decision Case No. CU 97-115/ADB 97-116 Page 8 (3) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a construction parking plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. The parking plan shall address: (a) How and where alternate parking for the 36 spaces now allocated to Wiggins Properties will be provided, and (b) How and where parking for construction workers will be provided. (4) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit a visitor parking plan to the Planning Division for review and approval. The plan shall address how visitor parking can be readily provided during visiting hours at the facility. (5) The permit shall run with the Iand and be transferable. Entered this 5`h day of April, 1999, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. Z, &-Co-4-,ew Ron McConnell Hearing Examiner RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department for further procedural information. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Section 20.100.010.E allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. APPEALS Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and the conditional use permit. shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the nronerty by the Snohomish Countv Assessors Office. f r Hearin Ex �'aminer Deci"sion g' Case No. CU 97-11StADB 97-116 Page 10 Memli Younkin Dale, Watkins 200 Jarnes'St. #104 Lovell Sauerland Edmonds, WA 98020 .19400 33Ave. W r=- Lyriwaod, WA 98036 Planning.Division " Karen Wiggins AU Engineering Division Wiggens Propeties; LLC . u�� 152 Yd Ave. South, Suite ?102A ` (a of Edmonds, WA 98020 W.' . OTHER PARTIES REQUESTING A COPY OF THE DECISION: LL o. z Roger Hertrich Mark Kuhlman 1020 Puget Dr. T4 Engineering LU Edmonds, WA 98020 5823 NE Minder Poulstio, WA 98370 Lu' w u. p O Z r a i I } wk r dc--R TOO 4 �Im QME tP lffi RF'QFtME® MAR 9 0 1999 WIGGINS PROPERTIES LLC P1Annur i DEPT. Commercial Property Management Much 29,1999 Steve Bullock - City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Wa. 98020 File#CU-97-£15/ADB-97-116 Project Location: 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Name o£Applicant NW Care Management & EFCA, LLC Faxed to (425) 771-0221, original copy mailed Gentlemen: " When we responded to the above file on March 26,1999, we did forget to mention our concern that the temporary puking for our tenant during construction would be such that our tenant will not have to walk thou construction debris, mud, etc. to access the sidewalk or street Thank you for taking this into consideration Sincerely, WIGGINS PROyP,ERTIES, LLC Karen M. WWns, Member ce: EF.C.A., LLC, c/o Michael Meeks, Member Robert A. Henning t52 "'I Ave. S, Suite f02A, Edmonds, W. 98020 (425) 776-1143 Fax (425) 774-3336 10 Ma1-31-99 OS :03P P:Ol C2) THE JOHNSTON ASSOCIATES INC. ARCHITECTS 375 ERICESEN AVENUE SUITE 222 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA 98t10 (206) 842.2641 FAX.(206) 842.0727 2 V� FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Sj FnoCharlie St -Bullock Wright: _MCty fEdmonds 3/31/99 nxNumb- 4257710221 3 N a Nr rvuassER rtmeas otscTN 21, :x no425.771.0220 9806 Small scale gauge and site plan 1 Edmonds Assisted Living Community m 'I � r 141 DaytonSnreet Edmonds, Washington ❑URGENT X FOA REVIEW ❑ PLEASE CAMMENT 13 PLEASE REPLY ❑ FOA VOUR USE � -x i Dear Steve; We have increased the shot of the garage for structural reasons. This will increase the parking count. We have also removed the ports —du re and made the -cry off 2nd Avenue into a two-way in and out of the garage. This eliminated the need for a garage exit onto she existing egress drive at the north end of the site. The anached site plan reflects these revisiom. This information is meant as an update of our drawings. I plan p.. to make mention of these changes in the presentation tomorrow to the C.U.P. hearing exannner. Do these changes present problem? Please call ifyou have any quemiom. rl. ?+�.: ........... .fi. . Sa • •.j"";;ur;E.:.r;iC;EEiEI• • � 111 Utu.0 laiii .............. :ri .uElE�Ew.10 *0)1 4 •/......YSSY! L.CgCC E��'Enee��evec-nY.r i.�i rrx.• �+uruu.ruua.c. p s........o •;;acE f .s..r.rzzzr O i llli;; ii•ll ill liltYYY�YYJfi4itlE 1-7 EXISTIN FINANC �usaaau . ialiil 3 j I I p • i �►4�► o E7 ai � � p p ��� ��� p p r , .w ao y 17 Ii Is N" 31 sa 22 7771 a� n to s+ so 51 sa t.Jt._ zf s ai V 01-14:. is ai LT Q /14' QQq_ 6L - � 41, . ... 49 - _ 4s 44 a7 , as as al si as a+ s i x it ss sq ' to ;il 42 43 1 � , 1 � t 1 1 , t 1 , r rJ �= 1 1 1 ----------- L._ ..-------J s It PARKING GANA .._ .. «. .. ...... ......._ ... ... _.. ».. ........ ' �. �.Ylw.-..r4rr+•.L�.w'+w.....r--.w.�+.r.N.ni.lin.-�...��w....C.4 �.� } C �" i:,. .w�...w-.,.nr.r......t-...rr.. M-'cro .. 12608-B INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH Com TUKWILA WA "98168 TEL (206) 248-3191 SySter�ts Washington L$C�. FAX t206>248-3313 a cc w ,, ION `- c Uj Mm Z h, Z O� w wl �! o I,- w U. pi +- Z� V F= O Z 'i'ne next image may a a dup►ii to of the previous image. , { Other is f CFt F 1i1 Sg67(,9R� N - www,microcomsys.com 3 w w m o y ..fa! EXISTING EDMONDS I FINANCIAL CENTER fl AVENUES �� N, ... •r f 3�^tS yk,- ! .., � 4��t� 4'9.� it v 1 � s s sr iNk"ct'Y dit `•-, � 'i'w, `bi.gvi� 34'2��. t i rt. Yrota i t.. ! }r �. . °r t r! Y� � �srrr inn <i r �• , y w�t�ti y'�i,� i'� r' +„ �t,� � V�.�.'r r e` r t> � jss I .....,„..... -. xs�rta.Y ,..,yz_...o:sr.�.9 sca'�eaw)»wosn+uta.r«wa—..,,...,«.,......,...•...o+.....wwawwawvir+ -»+mmveasmysnv+n+am�ena..�.,,;.,:..,...,::..:=:...sw+:,�..snvr�,nss,�mrxwuuen.+ca�.^axz<.e.•:,i.s.�cm. e;,u,.:. • Mar, 29. 1999 1 i :46Au JACK WIGGINS CONST. NO. 5100 P. 1 WIGG� OPE18T1ES Commerdal Property Management r LU a{ U N ai March 29,1999` I J F' UO LU - - U. �' c Steve Bullock City of Edmonds Development Services Department o 1215th Avenue North p Ui W1. Edmonds, Wa, 98020 F File #CU-97-IIS/ADB-97-116 w. W Project Location: 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Wa. 98020 01 Name of Applicant NW Care Management & EFCA, LLC zi Faxed to (425) 771-0221, original copy mailed 0 z Gentlemen: When we responded to the above file on March 26,1999, we did forget to mention our concern that the temporary parldng for our tenant during construction would be such that our tenant will not have to walk thru construction debris, mud, etc. to access the sidewalk or street. 1"hanb you for this into consideration. Sincerely, WIGGINS PROPERTIES, LLC Kasen M. Wiggins, Member • ' f,' cc: E.F,CA., LL.C, c/o Michael Meeks, Member Robert A. Henan; n,a 152 3rd Ave. S. Suite 102A, Edmonds, Va. 98020 (425) 776-1143 Fax (425) 774-SS36 t y ' • h5�t � yi 4� • Ve2 It, �,r;, h n. �A_;-�N;�.r�'� •" ^. ( i( ) Ott c[ 'Sstt s a' .= 4li 9',4 1irY1 Z,: 2r-. , 4f t•>.'1 vj i* .(_.. { S .Z 4 1'y s, ( '� ✓ u'I h 1 l.' Aft WIGGINS PIDIOPPERTIES, LEG �eR 2 9 i9�9 Property Management ....'Commercial PLANNING DEPT. z h- J U 0" March 26,1999 t11 14 h=+ toU. z Steve Bullock 01 City of Edmonds Development Services Depafnnent LUAU Cl 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Wa. 98020 0 .� s File #CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 LL F� Project Location: 141 Dayton Street, Edmonds, Wa.: 98020 zl Name of Applicant: NW Care Management & EF" U C LU s z ~ Faxed to (425) 771-0221, original copy mailed " Gentlemen: We have nothing against doing the above project, in fact think this would be a; good addition to Edmonds. However, we have a special circumstance that must be . taken into account if this, or any other project is bust on that property. *,. We have a permanent easement for parking both on this property. and 110 0 t James Street. I have enclosed a portion of a rather recent title report that shows this easement. Also enclosed is the easement agreement, filed Apra 11,1997 in Snohomish County, Washington under Recording No. 9704110061. 1 1is easement, in perpetuity, gives us the right to the use of 36 parking spaces somewhere (at the grantor's discretion), on the properties located at 141 Dayton Street and 110 James Street 152 3rd Ave. S. Suite 102A, Edmonds, Wa. 98020 . `{425} 776 1143 Fax (425) 774-3336 ." f pp t . ". n 1f f�i),t.., i try. r t1s `">• J'��� ujte" F���r i�, , '.{ tf5ri nq "i.�}ri d`Yrr ,��YT1 h^tk}i'7ta;jrs r'IS.�. Y v iJ P .¢ i 1. �, :}:� . '"t• r`U,,���t�� s`at; ri f1(1tK►109M11W �!l!��'�{t� -'c^ � n �r _ ;.r e ani �,- ���z!.;,i'�►4orv, tw! 8litl•ti0f.fll�d��! ��� 1�,� �I 411 Y?' TRANSNATION TITLE INSi7RANCE COMPANY 2939 Colby Avenue Everett, Washington 98291 ,. zPrepared for: $Y' Prudential -Edmonds Realty For service. on this order call: ;5 �! 1Q8 - Sth Ave. South 1- 25 252-1156 {Fax # 259-Q526) phil•Poirier, Title officer -'o' Edmonds, SPA or Tonya Harris,, Assistant Attn: James Clausen LUI RE: seller order No. 610392 Buyer/Borrower: To corns Customer Ref ScMMULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: January 9, 1998, at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to,be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy $To Be Determined Premium $ Standard Policy Tax Proposed Insured: To come ALTA Loan Policy $To Be Determined Premium $ Extended Policy Tax Proposed Insured: To come Total $ 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: EFCA, L.L.C. 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" _continued- } LEGAL DESCRIPTION: �+ That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, a! W.M., described as follows: of BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Third and Dayton Streets in the City of Edmonds; thence West 338 feet to the true point of -beginning; LLIthence North 010181221, East, a distance of 263.88 feet; ® thence North 88041122" West, a distance of 231.24 feet to the Easterly margin of SR-104, as conveyed to the State" a of Washington by deed recorded under Auditor's File Number 2141566, said margin being a curve to the left o having a radius of 500.00 feet and from which intersection point the center of said curve bears South 7205215911 East; © thence Southerly along the arc of said curve to the left Lu and consuming a central angle of 09027111t1, an arc c distance of 82.49 feet to a point 100 feet Easterly, as m measured. radially to the L line, of Highway: Engineers �- Station 20+00; thence South 23025127".West, a distance of 61.26 feet to a point opposite and 80 feet Easterly of Highway. O Engineers station 20+68.17 P.T.; ZI thence South 01009115° West, 80 feet _Easterly and - _ parallel to said L line, a distance of 106.83 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineers Station 21+75; thence South 44026145" East, a distance of 28.10 feet to a point opposite Highway Engineer Station 9+00 and 30 feet Northerly, as measured at right angles to the centerline of Dayton Street; thence South 88041/2211 East, along the Northerly margin of Dayton Street, a distance of 249.74 feet to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT the East 30 feet thereof for.road; (ALSO KNOWN AS Parcel A of Boundary Line Adjustment recorded under Snohomish County Recording Number 9512120410 and Correction thereto recorded under Snohomish County Recording Number 9605220436); Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington 2 4 r ) t � e t .S !{ L {1 j 1. } { ! 4 f 1 t 3 f. t{ } S �i �• } t . p__:1.`S..P'..lw._......4,..,.,..w,..a.51Y".<L:W.Kitt:trlkY�tu+.aatu+:.w..... :' . rn. w»wxc+.steno.mra6Wxrmuaemtwlntr.�mta+ssweewa'+w....i.:..� tf«...u(u W2+nYlfit±rra.4L.CffR3'nEVttttaplSJ:SesAt2.'iLL.t!✓Vy!....:", ,. .f OM c w rS i 3,t Order No. 610392 11. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed "upon said property;.and rights of tenants to remove trade at thm iration of the term.• ------ 12. THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RANTEE: Robert A. Henning, individually and as -Jvs Wj Person Representative of the Estate of "'i> Phyllis G. Henning cn PURPOSE: As in said document J � AREA AFFECTED: As in said document LW p RECORDED: April 11, 1997 RECORDING.NO.: 970411006;S_ L < 13. co ON D OF AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: EFCA L.L.C., a Washington Limited z ram--;. Liability Company Lo' . TRUSTEE: Commonwealth Land, Title Company of LU ! Snohomish County 7 2 BENEFICIARY: Frontier Bank ORIGINAL. AMOUNT: $3,820,000.00 n DATED: December 19, 1995 LU RECORDED: December 27, 1995 x vt RECORDING NO.: 9512270554 u, �p`1 .zl Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by Uj x contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. f= o z NOTE s The above instrument also shows the following: } Loan No.: Undisclosed Beneficiary's address: PO Box 2210, 332 SW Everett Mall Way, Everett, WA 98203 ASSIt3NME'TT3C -� 14 . OF RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : ASSIGNOR: EFCA L.L.C., a Washington Limited ' Liability Company ®, ASSIGNEE: Frontier Bank DATED: December 19,. 1995 RECORDED: December 27, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9512270555 t"!. 5 {zx.i M { . ., k ,2,y.id. t+Za..a.Y..It..M+'S4'M.streWen - irwux•.as..u......Y.:..........+...xu... +..aa. auWbxW[SY4ium;iNtwx+fenafWY+taaa.ttwvald'^+n'.^.........+nwiawawwo-taa`wNhTDC�tEw'MYf: •..4.F.iL.7YZ5 :lMi�.G. Yki.t,.': 1 � ••vim} '•v...S � wwn.........•.. F t NO . EXCISE 'PAX 97 APR I I AH 9r h9 z WAaaxaoaadeatt,aro REQUIRED � d " ; EFcA. t.r c : Fx- aforuafrMaaaaa APR 21199T sRrtf, .1 Ky _ nftm WA M viBQk t+4i : 1� C r 9t �{ taaagrurtarrr i �`, coal _ _ u._8o9 nAav� _< uj ZASZbHWAGPJMMZNT Ui O G4serer TiiG4a.t.0 . W ` — ', drove poem:}Dry.bdhenempat.eytlsatssEemieorvllo itmdq� r: t1 flapaU WASE432M7MMZWKAditoadkgdoaVW6rd% ay d (t}OmweshoWrl GErMRTSI$rADDTOBUMONDS,MOUD,m.WMt.2&&AdddmdlploapvL Aaaw'sAas wNambom , ("am a"Sh"Wiae 2t27at4690==d2327Qi10"w � 3,� i ,.; tG t�unaro'st�opaq:a�8 eol0006 �'�� ,.. w Hof }•} Off' s :- , .. t�9 THIS F.f1.SElUIEt�I AGREEMENT dated for identiRauiaa pmpases she �7 � Lu_. v■�I April, 1947, is by and between EFCA, L L C, a Washingtam limited liability e�npsny, wd ettirantoe) aid Robert A. Hemin& indlvldsally and as paaaeal r va of the EacW of Phyllis G. Hemi i& (Grantee"). v N ,.' -art ' { � •���. .� . RECITALS ' W W yjs.' ate": b y •.` t �, a C3 A. Grantor is the awns• of two eaidgOcus parcels of real property located at 241 '' 1= _ ''• Dayton St. and 110• James Street in Edmonds, Snohomish Como, Wes, a legally cr—'` desQibed oa �ribit'A" attac}ai herato sad iaoorpataoed trrxrdn by t6� tetireoeG x ali Cn called the-Gra or'a rropesty'�. B. Grantee is the owner of rest pop" located at 130 lid Ave. So. in Edmonds, � *� Snohomish Comity. Washington, as leptty described of ExFdbit "B" attacbed ber and ' ;« inrmpmated herein by this reference, (hereinafter called the "M n►tea'a Prope=ty"x f• NOW THEREFORE, in eoraideradca of the mutual coveomits cowained huatn. { . the pwft hereto agree as fotlewx :i '. • :. i. Grantordoes hereby gtm end couvey to Grantee and his beiraf 99009890M aWgm lke a tes and hwhem, for do sole benatlt of Gra ftes Properly. ' the right to we tbirtyatx (36) pu+8 ; I, on Grawnes Property (da" Slecori. tha T: x location of which shalt be at Graftes sole &Pared*& Such tight shallbeebdadve ss toall but • s•� • VOL. 3295PAGE0317 y x �• iF f 4 3.� f - � r.j •..• _ 4 j ' ..x,n.af.uwz6:^N9abax, r<+vst� Lxttunumtalxa•e..swhlwvar+vi,w(n+,.+......_�.__,..+�.....oimw4eextn.tvv'+•3Y htT9VA.... i1"'kC'E .v.1 ..�.'a.z e.. tf",;k � ' t Grantor and Grantor's a ' ti ' •,, gents.'empinyees. eontractan, guests -and irvitees. Grantor and Grantors agents, employee, contractom guests and invitees shall be allowed to use the Parking Z Spaces so long as there e an adequate number of Parking Spaces available for the Gruttee's ar; Q k '• Property without undue interference. Grantee agrees to notify Grantor in writing when Grantee r believes. in good faith. that Grantors use is unduly interfering with Grantee's rights hereunder. } and Grantor shall thereupon limit or eliminate use of the Parking Spaces to correct strait undue •Q w t y _ interference. The initial locations of the Parking Spaces are described on the Peeking Spaces ` . ' Addendwn attacked hereto and incorporated herein by this reference• Grantor, its successors and ' ''•5 t"t C' � r _ assigemay.at anY time at their sole disereton. change the location but not te nmmber)or the vy � _ • '•�j, Parking Spur by complying with aU of the following conditions: ' rn LL r _ (a) rM owners of the Grantees Property must haft access to a total of thirtyUJ : w O _ six (36) Parking Shea• f (b) . The Parking Spaces mint all be located on the Grantor's Property andfor r f U. the property created by the potential vacation of Jura StreetIn rr ; (c) Grantor provides Grantee with thirty (30) days' prior written nodw of the' t" 7C relocation ofaata or an of the Parking Spaces• z f {d} Grantor records an Amended Parking Spaces Addedrnn identifft the tar tut new location of the Parking Spaces. Upon such recordatim which shalt t { not require Grantee's signature, all previously recorded Putting Spam ; �? v — _ Addenda shall be deemed superseder! and tepttrcxd by the last tecotded 0 F. .�' AddCnd .�y� )��• Yy/�� e W /W� , ^ !i.r -+i ✓ Z Grantor does hereby grant and convey to � his hens. snocessom assigns, licessnes and ittvita% for the sole beaei'tt of the ttnmCeo'a } ,� r 6 u. pl ..' Property, ton sasattest for access, Ingress. and egress ore. ova and across tray acceesways or �`,• :. zi• - driveways existing on Grantor's Property for the sole propose of parking in the Puking spaces. n� , sr 3. Malntesv to MA UOWIIIX Anent The tesponsibility for and cost of maintenance =&or repair of the Puking Spaces shall be home by the owner of Gtentoes , Properly NA its su=wors and assigner Grantee, his beirs, successors and ssaign% shalt be liable for all damages to Grantor, Grantor's Propertyi or to any third party or third puty's property , Y• arising from or in any way connected with the use by Grantee, his heirs, sors, assigtrs,.; flows= or itvitees of tie Peeling Space. Grantee, his befits, stirs and assign, will hold . humtess and indemnify Greene, its srrcoessma and assigr336 against and hoar any dunaM toss, J t . atpense or liability, including attorneys few and Mated costs, restiltiag fcom.arahr an of the _ . Pukbq Spaces. This hold beamlas and indemnification shall wtvive the teemiraaioa Of this ,' : eascramd fmm OW cause wbaboavor. :} 2 ® •.: _ ' ..' 4. - vac. 32J5 0 970 4110 0 01 p�cE 3 8 ® s 4 f _ Sit �} mg r 4b i t t J �' ti iv1Y>x`.i�.. i t- a i t ✓ a n n Kr t� 4� t i i F7 r t i ...,.. .� {w'i�4..,„.Jts.•n„4Jrat.i.'.J.�,txrsv,.x.,.+...,.......-.:.,,...,.•..,va..��neuaysw.a.*i'u��rrs.•amf_�n3vanx+.xY.tHa.•ay.+nroeea�ihwro._ow..cv..wa..s.,.:....-...,..-w+w.:asxe,..v..sl�.•.t*.ti'Y'.M'F:%:.; lc's2r ...r,1.. Y.:i.F..S.i:r t c,, . .. .,fit. d. Bldg and RegulallmL This easement is subject to Grantee's agreement to take all necessary and proper action to ensure that the users of the Parking Spam, the Parking Q • + Spaces flit private passenger vehicles (automobiles, sport utility vehicles, trucks and vans) only, and comply with all rules and regulations that the owner of the Grantor's Property imposes on F the use of the Parking Spam so long as such rubs and regulations are In force generally as to all cc 2�. parking spaces located on the Grantor's Property. Grantor shall provide Grantee, at the address set forth below or any address communicated in writing to Grantor, with a copy of all rules and ;? .a N 1 regulations in affect as to Grantor's Property, if any. Failure to notify the users of the Parking p ` Spaces of such rules and regulations shall be a material breach ofthe two of this Agreement. W� •.. J S. .The term of said easements shall be IndeMita•and shall contiaaa until � LL revoked by the mutual agreement of Grouter and Grantee or their baits stto�ats or assigns. w O Said casements ate intended to and aball run with the land and the bcaeft and bardea s of the g easements hereinatxted shall pass to the hens, sera and assigns of the parties in and to . '" skein respeedw ptopaties bemueflted and burdened by these U. + ` N d _ : j 6. Cma and,A_itoMMe Fees. If any party hereto shall bring any Salt, arbitration or 10therUbMagamst anoiberforrelief;dectmatoryorothcwlse.arisingoutofthis Agri,the 1"v. w •` prevailing party shall have and recover against tba other party, In addition to all costs and a ;: disbursements, ts, such sum as the�out, or ntbiter may determine to be a reasonable aYtaaws fee.LU a W — — T. SneciBe Perfannrmc� if any party shall default in its obligations under this ; �{ Agreement, the parties esch acknowledge that it would be extremely difficult to maesu a the resulting damages. 'Accordingly, any nondefualtmg party, In addition to any other rights or V '- : _ ,,: .z remedies, s5a11 be entitled to restraint by injunction of a violation, or attempted or threatenedt o F Rei} violation, of any condition or pmvisiva ofthis Agreement, or to a dec es specifically cornpelling = t%: .::' r j;. r ; performanceof any such condition or provision. to such even k all parties hereto each ? '..... waive their defense that aremedy is damages or at rawwould be adequate.LL _0 z g. Each posy to this Agmrnerd shalt perform any ad all seta ad W (UAS execrate and deliver any and all docents as may be necessary and proper under the Z:circumstances in order, td accomplish the iurtmts and purposes of this Agreement and to Carry out .j (y its provisions, n 9. NotigM To be dI'wAm any notice hereunder shall be in writing, delivered In r Person or mauled by certified or registered mail, postage Prepaid, to the affected party or pies at the addresses set forth below their signatures hcrdo, or to such other address as the parties = t• may hereinafter designate. .Mj — KSS • - f •. i rip ' 3 14 VOL 3295PIGE0319 041100 .704 •`� y J a." ', i_ `._._ ..e, .•t ,r r ��..',r q�`° i tt c�,r;4. �"? �4)�t+. 4� 4,`"w=e {�". 4t n �� ® NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE .IT IS DUE TO ThlE�t2UALI Y OF THE DOCUMENT. • •u1 x•�"{Rt. :f: ;i .��a{•{VrS. .. 4. S 't. ,}i,. {t,i'`.: ''S� :... .. tip �j' - - .•_,r ,-. .. _ .` f' r tt .df 9r i .•Q y. i .. ' t • "iS;.. �r•,��'c :�17;-Y tf.^ x '1'.f'!'� ° .. tr lr.7'.�i.Q]` t `tlf •: {,�, �� {'a. •.'}'�i.!• ti• t { f... Its •oi � )• -. (' .t , , jta fit;.{.. s �.r: t i. •t •! �:;:R i• .i:'. i.'' : �' .".a J ... ,}. C } }:a ��:�• � t. .t ;f. r {::.i•.; ,'s /'! 1'.. ��z }• �'+>: }Ijt },.i. �:• r�G- �t ;1#•.{�'}'3t it �. ;.!.`.. {'ii."lt� •i �i-r 't� r �)• �t �i:r� 7 t: r, , y ,y7. ,tt. � t . at ' •+ � .i ,� .7 .{ 'ice ' :L•ti i. :�..`t; KRj1 K :#i.' y •tt ui ct.ir. ( .t.S •vit 'j,•: �• 7• •t. T to Y' •S. ::F yYON" :}s:'. •3',... j}..i. •, t���"N •'., '� •,�,:, .!'l. `.e7. (.yr • ',3'. {F� j• . l�: rti. ) . 4^T1 :.�: pi, .} . t •"t s T! t,p ..t. t �... t P .f Ji _.1..".,• ' i•, � oti '•'i 'i' .� !'• �� k ..7. S a ',. ,•�• }.yy y •y' ry . t .xx�4t•. fa�( r �i•r [ i E•....} i '' {';`'}tr,: •ri �• i' i 3t... i; z �r i . ,i, �,{. .t., �i t. �' .%" •}�� •• ri• � '�t S. ; �t• y• ••i' U .. .. .i�'a..:� ..t..:.... ..� �: .._..t._._ .. .. -q .... ... .... .. .C'}l r, r.. .. ,t .. _.,. r..:.a'�•�-/.. i1 �•l }•• '. ,y`i:; Pv .t. 7 {�•i•., .iaJi 4 _ , K. !rn.i '•r•' ,♦ .« • it • , .. .. .. 5.�.....v I, 1x�`. •��• R, � .. .• .. " � ;F,,. l •� ' ! is t 1 foots t� s,`r:� a O t ` klNSNINt 00 > BL CA t r Y 5 a 8 �y t # f., K3'a;`;•v�,>O .W�rzMMN.»twet,�,iti:,Fvrr , ... _ 'fie y.}.ts• a»w„ ; •n ; ' . •� ':,,�%y n;,�`.. `.• ` • T ::ti, • y f7 Y l! verve �ttK � � `: i 'RI��^,•.;crr••'s : ;,�•k� s •4a�:� •� ` "' � �i z.•,� • •v'' J• ,: • : `. i � .y. S' - - .C„•r, t�...ati.'•�..r,'�i.�"'�a''w�aal�MP:IN��>ZYa �.baY..':•.'�.y'����a�atl�S.f�•°L"..�i`.twk`n'>'�.'.a+<•%st;: ,i%xi'`, ar-��,K� �A,� f ,�.r,:.io.. ",�••.e.. oti��: � � rr }•. .fix',' k' >, .r«rsn. .ye4%o it 5 _ _ - t$3tas3w2.« •;1'?� is ' i; i 4rv'w'•�°' •N+r2G;:^�•h n...,Y%l r:•it.t!r J,� '$�'t$�°F+Sk .r«l iiti„s^'• �w`•'t"'1 n t:... .+:9! ,� SA;: _.�, ti•. <�� s,.�x ♦., 7 .'• «+t' N'• t. T., _5'"�yy�`�•':•f••t•t• �,«� ,lrt•Aiv ".'..T "'.♦ x �. -.rE •-sy,•':"'ttYs: ,ty✓". .n'>�'•..S,:'.r+�«'•'•'::i•F•rY+•.!'T,';�t. w'^+�y' s. `a•'w.fisj;! ^tt+J'n.t.,.•.. z��" r { i4 � tfi9 } � -,` ellan C. I Sf �$ o. : i �# • j CD tu r V �tJfi ^•v � � � F � �.� � - • - � die �Y: : �. : { 1 t t ? h ,$a`r c � �is Gam?. d� � .� .9 r, � •• - "•T"s' i C -7 't..^ • �• �';•: Y' 7 al ..,..• 7 _ _ ..7;i _ c{'! .; +• .•x .. .. _ : �:. •_ :i:•i'-'a".., .. - t i .z••{{ jj��,:;qq, .± "-i •.t; �!'. {, 'tii.. ..4f•};e . j f�.i:- i� .:a: •.!. t i. .=iT C:.'il", i is :i•• _ i .33''N. ,y,., •t.� . -..� 'c x' is •?-' r_.c �A�}jI['i{ !A•. ^L? ' :t.l"t` tf:kf{.i; S 1M •i'. (> f ..sT� ..}},� i�i �S: . y ..ty .i• ..t+. ,.: 'r' 'ta l,.. • F.t,a;' t. i •.:i:'.i ::. •:4 .`ii,:• it . i :: .iG `. #' •� _ '�.:','' � :.. � is •, .i' ;rr•.. ,"r - t,,.,: .,1� ;ts .. ,t ° ,i�itt -:iJ'i 't %. •, ,t _i;� ii '!r. .•'.:d.t.. .s, .i .die' «s: 'r tj •'ir.r " 'ra 1 ��{�'!•.. T '.i`r.At.. .ir#'•:1 '�y,. .`�;i't••:j.'., i:'� ''.` ,r�ii� .ak.t• .'�':'�• i i.t':t.�� t .. ,iih ! C. t� � pi�t 11•, �[7r. .i )r•. ya :q , .1.tFf 't , ..wy,Sa Y.. .. , •.„t. t.YS .iF� ai 'P. i,`'+r.• i 'i .It r�i t.. 'i.'.11��•t ��11j{.i )':• .. -.; '•tti :r. i.r tl +, t�. � l {'�r. Y�tsis {. �t • t(.q.�{. a .. }° fit: 'o: 'i!' •'f't•':; •r:'-�•' .,` :.; -,. i.1•r .t. :'i'^I!' .. Li .M iT `�' - ' "'F �a �t..h ..t .tY... Y i. .�. � i• {, 'r .!. •t• g�•.:••. i:i •;' t. . • e i•'i.l. '.�: ' I N3Wt100Ct 3N3 !!l0 Al tlVl1D H1013t10 Ill �I 10(� SIMl --• ` Yy NVH.L NV710 SS31 SI 3WVVJ SIM NI 1N3Wt1000 3M Al :30110N r � � 4' d � Y!f S f � 1•(r { tSs' '�".�.� Y4 L5,P ti,y � 4 A ,r •{w3��i.h -1 d ) G�. y 1 tt { if 1 i � t - e;�. 3n-�....�Y, .. FS: �.l...r.w..r..+.v3uftFxw..XRYh',d5d'13�1r' �X.2ibwwuAtw..o..b..a...wwrvrnnsaWlea,ioro6nOuttMUm.>rMttv4Tawaw.uMnflfaa,caw+was+Web.6u..o.....:.......s"1'..:...w...+r.�t...eMmneY.fi;LLM.�k1nFHSk•E3�i i..,..:MY"s rFLv54.�S'f, iii�a......t EXHIBIT A �- LA} PARCEL A: z That powm of she Soutbenat gnatter of the Sonoma gmtn of Section £' s V0 ' ?. '. • `; '�' 23. Towsnhfp 27 North, Range East, W.M., deaen'bed as fonows: � L1 ae.: 'r�"c «: a Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Third and Dayton Streets In the City to _ :: w; THE a West 338 fat to the true pond of _ y •TMCENorthl•18'22"East.adistame6of263.88fat; ' THENCENoethW41WWes4adiomof231.24fe&, ;; • Easterly margin of SR 104, as Crettre Vd to the State of Washington by ; £ t ,, ...,,:� dad rocadad under Auditor's File No. 2141566. avid margin being a� crave to the left having a radius of 50000 fat and fiam winch 6neetion Oti _ pout tie Center the of said curve beers South 72WSr Paw, w LU: mj THENCE Southerly along the are of said carve to the left aril conmuning a �' i t r caatsal angfa of Mri 1 . as arc distance of 82a49 feat to a jpow 100 feet -.-+ �;?= , s• Easterly, as messmW mildly to the L lime, of liigxmV Flrgia m 3taf m ., t3 h '�'a?dt' 20+00; Lys us .' TEiF.t=iCE South MW 27" West, a of 61.26 lied to a point } „ U- 'f s ' oamits sand 80 fat Easterly of Highway &*am Sbdoa 2ML17 , 34 TH@10E South 1Wir Ww4 80 fat Easterly ad patahidi to said L :' + •• t t line. a distance of 106.83 feat to a•loin opposite Highway Fwjmm�.• Station2l't•75; gat TMCE South 44026145" least, a tGstartce of 28.10 feet to a paint ' opposite Highway Engineer Station "M and 30 fed Northerly, as' me mned at rigid angles to the mteriine of Aaytoa Stoat s ` THENCE South 88041W East. along -the NortW.V margm 9f DWa ` Streat, a tQatanoe of 249.74 Act to the true paint of 1, gimm ; EXCETrf : t1e East 30 facttheraof farmed. VOL32J5pas0322� j704110 061 w Y• Mrye,d •.� a 7"` rp '� t ,a 4 ,� ( y r +�t �Mkrt .t F"�u - vet +�y1 �7"a k ;,� �a �'T d 4. � ,F. 5 ,y_...viv x�' •'�r:F �Naf ����`�� �r"r *et �S ��-. ' :, ?'t f •+Y�F- !S 1°''{.", 43 } .Vi t VK f: W CZ. 4 i �gV it4`e4r1 •r kJ.1 ";�i r x!� fiJ t t I tt. .�''� <c .ty n d �MAv Dart '?aiY' f r ' t I!- J t`f r�°� iY}JJ tix^�)) }•' ly s i ♦ r ![/•�f b pui1 s tt rz a rs "i 4 S t yy .. _ ..�.: '• r .. - i � . • .r.isr...r.-ewv/xduw4KatKfsE'=^NdA.fa:tiT.-�.......y.?�y�"'M ..�.Sw#,"-r.Y.s: tC ... ..�.r .._.S.ctJJ.YA� 5 7 3:x17:Y.'.Rinitm'x'+.Alin'e�.Y+n•nanawiv.>N':,+,w.•'....rw...+u...,•.wrm.nn+wunirs✓Mro.�•tbHM�.'Mfetxw.eKa2lbnvluvmYrwvs.,+kw.+•uw.... ..._. Y ^ EDCtitI3Ti'A (CONTIAM D) . ' t PARCEL ti: Q That portion of the Southeast quarto of the. Southeast quarter of Section # 23. Township 27 North. Range 3 East. W.M, defer lxd as follow 0! Beginning at the Nasthwwest caenex of Third and }Dayton Stze�t In the City, • + �i ofEdmondsf w �- 2E_ TMCE West338 fact; err U.11MCENorthY'lrWEtnyadistmnmof263.88feetLU 'i• - MMCE North 88'4I W West. distasee fed to the tare x a of30.00 pohtr ; f on� } `{: cn C1 TIMCEt continuing North 88.4I "n" West. a distance of 201.24 fat to Y i the Festerty margin of SR.-104, as conveyed to the State of Wain by deed recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 2141566 and 2184033. said ` t ., rnargin being a cum'to the right having a radius of 500.00 feet Som bears South 72°52 W which intersection point the center of said curve W tu, d �F�Sh /1Q ** TMWCENodbertyalong the are of said ease to fire ' and • s z a ce t el angle of M513 , an are distance of 115.71 fed to the point of t W. MMCE North 30W3r East, along said fag* margin. a dtWnW of LL ' �� of 94.61 fed to the Southerly M& of James Street •,� `� 3 . isi tCi17 TEihTiCE South 591493r East. along said Southerly rmegin, a distance � ,• V of 185.49 fed to the Westeatp margin of2od Avemra S. a distance 1 z , s THE NM South 301241ir West, along acid Wesiviy marghut, of 104.57 feet' t ' • TEi •NCE South 2018'W West. along said Westerly marghn. "a distance of 7.79 feet to tit trite point of beg'rrming. 3 Situate intheCountyofsriob nish,stow ofWastingbm 'v 7 ® _ ,:.... /" �. rot. 3295PAGE0323 .tit •�• '- g'�0It 110 001 4^^ w••t � C_"—•Y,.ii _ - 1y : 1, I.x,+i �' ...irwtW+ J �•� t, tax 4 `S• �,� .,. _, -... �. t...c J.,n_ a a..i..Q_t .... �" .� _1. K 1'�S, j 1,a Yk { :f i'I;F •s,,lx,��r,> yy,��,s�f.."7` st 0 .�. t .S I F.. I �' "rb Lh� 4yy�;; r r< } ^r .. "'£ G t f i t ft.S {y.}7 �s Sr r, > c ,1::. �r •t ) y S y�.c�r�a t L,� i.1 ajoi tC r 4 •1 r `tr t't'n ss�,. ri, 7 �+ to j S # f"r�� vt' S+ '� t.: _. t;? t F �3 t �-. S CI rs arc4 1 '£ 11� !. .�. 1 r 1•st p i..s � 4 E f. fi. i. . � ( f{'S,, >K� i ! H\�"�,di't� qla d Jllcj 2{ �•`� >.;i ) i �4„�!q 13! 4: � t �f{^' '7.t G: S ) ,. '` ,-...,�•,v..swntrzccssaNwa•�arcsuarir.,uanws,aaw..,'`'`�l. t. r� f,'r, "••'9,'-'.'~ r#`- .a.- sf, s �£ ��,..luv v' • f { n � Z x ;� s `�` • ` ' Lots 1. Z WA 3. Stock z PIM of t COM's 1st Addfdon'v Sdnw»d� as ;;,b� ,?; Per Pht feeosded in Vatumc 5 of Pieta on pegs 43, reoneda:of Snohomish' p i Cou , ieamnw1y, ealkd 134, Seead /►yams SooW, Edmoiads. WaddV a. Waft tho load Aun de rPxd'aod n1l 1xrH&P and liJ rkt mow.' �aa ;r i 11 QY�! al i0d I�t00A i4f�Cttllt % tb on oruj t.�Y cn ie. w C)f Sitaaoa%Ekaa�+.Sroahoa�teComo�y.StabaofWin�an. LL .. S4 =I A. r La UA U) be yr+w a •t4 ci a rr, s+,.•x•'�a o" 1 r ,, aa,172. ' 4 • t t i - - xye�.'.�� ' VOL'3295PAOEU324 f •i y b 7 ' g04110' ►1 t c k r.R�,rjpy �:' ;..V �`t 1 9 t, •. a t ! a �, i itr r��r r'�' c Y T }�I`��es} {r <t�t f�� s sj� i ..?i,. ' .,� . . , f. ;,', ty3 ..r1E' ` ' F'`•Ss:..,. .. •'+.c}.,._. vd .r6',. a°t�ta5' t h`>:+„�t.y;`�Y��"�L'if+iGa1y,�t p�fr� i MAYOR CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA'FAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 - FAX.(425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT �n c;189p Planning - Building • Engineering 3 Transmittal . Date: ` March 261999 - To: Thomas Johnson Northwest Care Mgt., 385 Erieksen Ave., Suite 123 Bainbridge Island, WA Subject: CU797-115/ADB-97=116 Transmitting ' Agenda & Staff Re port For Your Information:, X As you requested: For your file: Comment: Note attachments: X Sincerely, Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant Cc: EFCA, LLC - Julie Brockman, NW Care Mgt. i; ° Incorporated August`11, 1890 • x `° Sister City - Hekinan, Japan i? U L co S S k 1 � x � CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, CONC USIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: Ron cCon 1, He ner From: e Bullock Senior Planner Date: MARCH 25, 1999 File: CU-97-115 AND ADB-97-116 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BY NORTHWEST CARE Hearing Date, Time, and Place: April 1. At 9:30 AM, 3id Floor Meeting Room Edmonds City Hall 121 5`h Avenue North Table of Contents Page Page I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................... ......... ......... .................. 2 A. APPLICATION ........ ........................................... ............ ....,....................,:.....:.:...............................,.......,....2 B. RECOMMENDATIONS ................... ....................................................... ................................................... ......3 II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS— ........... ........................ ............... ................ .3 A. SITE DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................,.,.....»,.....,..,...,...,3 B. HISTORY..................................................................................................................:...................................3 C. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT(SEPA)....................................................:.......................................3 . D. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE......,.................................................3 E. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC).................................................. .......5 ......................................................... III. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALSoo—.....................................................................6 A. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION....................................................:......:...........»......................................6 B. APPEALS..................................................................................................... 6 IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL..,......„.............................................................................................6 V. NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR .................. ................. ............... I ...... ................... 6 VI.ATTACHMENTS...................................................................................................................7 VII. PARTIES OF RECORD.............................................................................. ..................7 t x 1 Fi Northwest Care File No. CU-97-115 Page 2 of 7 1. INTRODUCTION The following is a staff report for the hearing of a Conditional Use Permit to allow an assisted care facility in the Community Business (BC) zone. The ADB has reviewed the proposal for consistency with the Design Guidelines and has made a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Hearing Examiner. A. Review by the Architectural Design Board cc 21 The ADB met on March 17, 1999 to review the request and adopt a recommendation to the u`fj U Hearing Examiner (see Attachment 2). The following recommendation for approval was made: 0; Boardmember Sullivan moved, seconded by boardmember Chalupnik, to recommend w t approval of ADB-97-116 and CU-97.115 to the Hearing Examiner, because the Board —t F- finds that: rs rL w O • The applicant has successfully met the requirements of ECDC section 20.10.070.A.6, _ that all sides of the building be adequately modulated; U. < • Although the proposal does not meet the requirements of ECDC section d 20.10.070.A.6 and 20.10.070.C.3, in discussions with the applicant, it appears that it t s ut could be modified to meet these requirements; • It should be noted that the roof as proposed does not meet the roof modulation Z O' requirements; ui wl Is With these modifications the application is found to be consistent with the NComprehensive Plan and other adopted City policies, it meets the requirements of the OF- zoning ordinance, and satisfies the criteria in the Edmonds Community Development UJ Code. Motion Carried LLThe Board's major concern was that the ridgeline of the roof that runs north and south the length of the building be broken up to allow for view corridors of Puget Sound to the west to be �j maintained for properties to the east of the proposed building. In discussion between the applicant V s; and the Board it appeared that the applicant could make some changes to their proposal to address t— the Boards concern. Drawings have been submitted which reflect the Board's request (see Z Attachment 7). With this design, the Board would recommend approval of the roof as a modulated design. All other element of this proposal met with the approval of the Architectural Design Board, including landscaping and materials. B. Application >a" 1. Applicant: Julie Brockman / NW Care Management, Inc. (see Attachments 3 and 4). 2. Site Location: 141 Dayton St. (see Attachment 1). p 3. Request: Consolidated Permit Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a 83•bed "Assisted Living Care Facility" and compliance with the City's Architectural Design Board Design Criteria. (see Attachments 2 — 4 and 6). 4. Review Process: Conditional Use Permit: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision. The Architectural Design Board (ADB) has reviewed the proposal and has made a recommendation. ®' 5. Major Issues (1) Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.53 (Community Business - BC). (2) Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.05 f (Conditional Use Permits). 97115sr.DOC! March 26, 1999 / Staff Report r r.. 'r j t i�^w t M \ xi .t{j. rl P", - � � 1E � � f 4z��. )�� � { tt Y �} � k � z.>�s �� •�� � # 4a i S `��r i0. zi s� u L - t1 ��# SYn � < trr ,i d ✓ �''{x +^� tx 1' i;4 z t ��'Pk r< 1 ^{i ^ z a Northwest Care FiIc Na. Cif-97-115 Page 3 of 7 C. Recommendations Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and. Attachments in this report we . recommend Approval of the requested Conditional Use Pertnit and Architectural Design`.approval for a ' Assisted Care Facility, according to the plans contained in Attachment 3, with the following z conditions: cc (1) The applicant must obtain all necessary permits and pay the required traffic mitigation fee (required in the MDNS) prior to any construction. o �' (2) All landscaping per the approved landscape plan must be installed prior to Certificate try 0( of Occupancy. Uy W { —J F(3) The permit shall run with the land and be transferable. � W H. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS u. a A. Site Description to a} Facts: 4 (1) Land Use: The subject property contains a single warehouse type structure. (2) Zoning! : The subject property is located in a Community Business (BC) zone'(see �Z W) Attachment 1). a(3) Terrain and Vegetation: The site is relatively flat with a slight slope from east to 0west side of the property. W w 2: Neighboring (Development And Zoning: (1) Fact: The property is surrounded on the north, east and west by the BC zone and Z commercial and mixed use development. The property the street to the south Lu is the City waste water treatment plant. 0 (2) Fact: The ferry holding lines are adjacent to the propertyon the west.. Z i B. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 1. Fact: SEPA is required of any project which requires a Conditional Use Permit. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued November 13, 1997, based on a submitted traffic study. No comments or appeals were received. C. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance ` t. Critical Areas Compliance ® a) Facts: (1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15.E (Critical Areas Ordinance). (2) A Critical Areas Checklist (CA-97-170) was submitted and the requirement for a study waived. b) Conclusion: The applicant has met the requirements of the Critical Areas Ordinance. 97115sr.DOC / March 26, 1999 / Staff Report ; M [gN } ., ._., ... �.. ............. ��.3N. ._„_t... .. i (� i Northwest Care ', v ': File No. CU-97-115 Page 4 of 7 2. Compliance with the Community Business (BC) Zoning Standards a) Facts: . (1) The fundamental site development standards pertaining to development in the Z - Community Business (BC) zone is set forth in Chapter 16.50.020. (a) Street Setback: 0 feet (b) Rear Setback: 0;15 feet from residentially zoned property (c) Side Setbacks: 0;15 feet from residentially zoned property .WJ `pvt (d) Height: 25 feet (up to 30 feet with a 3-in-12 pitched roof or t9j an approved modulated design) JLW b) Conclusion: The applicant has provided a proposal which complies with the to Community Business (BC) zone standards. _ 0. 3j 3. Compliance with Requirements for a Conditional Use Permit 2 U. a) Fact• " (1) Chapter 20.05 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby the following findings c. Z — and criteria must be met. The criteria are as follows: Z �; (a) The proposed use must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. W W 2 a' (b) The proposed use, and its location, is consistent with the purposes of the zoning U ordinance and the purposes of the zone district in which the use will meet all pM- applicable requirements of the zoning ordinance. (c) That the use, as approved or conditionally approved, will not be significantly O} detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, and to nearby private Z property or improvements unless the use is a public necessity. UJ (4' (d) The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the conditional use permit shall Ox run with the land or shalt be personal. Z b) The applicant has submitted the following declarations with their submittal which address the decisional criteria (see Attachment 4): (a) The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that it is in Edmonds, and it is zoned Community Business. (b) The project is consistent with the Zoning Code in that the BC zone states as one of its purposes: `"To allow for multiple dwelling units(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. (c) The project will not be detrimental in that the proposed use does not put a great burden on surrounding properties or uses. The typical resident will be 84 ©: years old, not drive their own car and have occasional visitors. The pleasing look of the building will help ensure that it will not be detrimental to the community. (d) The applicant has requested that this Conditional Use Permit "run with the'land" " and be allowed to transfer if necessary. 97115sr.DOC 1 March 26,1999/ Staff Report j ,x f:. 3 ,( {� 34 tit fti +:yqZ '''S�ty,�S, �.+FSLr' a•:r ldt t1 y {�. .�rte �yo-ta4�z+'`r"n Fs i�.t r y {i t - 9 7i 54us(R. ��ei� iitt3 .hs y � 7 ^Y r3'a w ?''•� x+v 1's, ofi Northwest Cote 4: File No. CU-97-115 - Page 5 of 7 c) Conclusions (1) The Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is part of the Downtown Activity Center with a Mixed Use Designation. The application is in compliance with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: z d A.]. Extend Downtown westward and connect.it to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. A.5. Support a mix of uses downtown without encroaching into single family LU V 01 neighborhoods. to Gi A.6. Encourage opportunities for new development and redevelopment which ttn LU {. LU �1 reinforce Edmonds attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Existing height limits are an important part of this quality of life, and CO LL - fl remain in effect. Uj A. 7 Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the U.Q downtown, especially to accommodate needs of senior citizens. dcn • A.H. Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas. Z 0 (2) The proposal will comply with all aspects of the Community Business development f' _ standards of the ECDC. ur ui� (3) The type: of use proposed generally does not generate as much traffic as a typical U Uy residential use, and is appropriate to be located in a Waxed use area with its potential Q }- access to transit. LU (4) Staff recommends the permit be allowed to transfer to future owners of the property. u~. p -- Z D. Technical Committee Va) Facts: - rz fl (1) The ADB and Conditional Use Permit application has been reviewed and evaluated Z by the Fire Department, Public Works Division, Engineering Division; and the Parks and Recreation Division. No department has any concerns that will significantly, change this, proposal. b) Conclusion: No technical problems have been identified. E. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC) 1. Comprehensive Plan Designation P � a) Fact: ® (1) The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site as part of the Downtown Activity Center with a Mixed Use Designation. The application is incompliance with.the following Comprehensive Plan policies: A.]. Extend Downtown westward and. connect it to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. A.S. Support a MiXr of uses downtown without encroaching into single family neighborhoods. A.6. Encourage opportunities far new development and redevelopment which reinforce Edmonds' attractive, small town pedestrian oriented character. Existing height limits are'an important part of this, quality of life, and remain in effect. 97115sr.bM / March 26,19991 Staff Report { . i' .. is . a....�.:.. ... ?.�... 5.. „.:��, .. �t ..+.,_ ,.. TIr - ey �i s. �. '"�i....I ,-i.�i:r 4 - ;'e.Y,C. na� d5':�#�_ .i .�l.ry rr t rr' Northwest Cara 01) file No. CU•97-115 Page 6 of A.7. Provide greater residential opportunities and personal services within the downtown, especially to accommodate needs of senior citizens. A.M. Provide for the gradual elimination of large and inadequately landscaped paved areas. 6) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. III. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact'the Planning Department for further procedural information. A. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010.E allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. B. Appeals Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shallbe made in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of -the project applicantand the; date of the decision, the name and address of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision being appealed. IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.85.020.0 states "The approved variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration and the city approves the application. V. NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. `y f Wrthvyizi Cal". . File No CU-97-115 Page 7 of 7- VI. ATTACHMENTS I Vicinity 1 Zoning Map - 2. , ADB Minutes and Recommendation 3. ADB Staff Report, including Elevations and Site Plan 4. Conditional Use Permit Declarations, by the Applicant. " 5. Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS). 6. Letter from Northwest Care redefining the project from 81 beds to 83 beds' 7. Modified Elevations in response to ADB recommendation III.. PARTIES OF RECORD 1. 'Staff 2. Applicant 97115sr.DOC / March 26,1999 L Staff Report 1 O 1® iZOningr and Vicinity Map Attachment I File CU-97-115 S. CONSOLIDATED PERMIT APPLICATIONS ADB-97.116 APPLICATION BY NW CARE FOR A CONSOLIDATED PERMIT REVIEW FOR AN 8Y•UMT, TWO-STORY, SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LOCATED OVER A SISTALL PARKING GARAGE. Charlie Wright, Jeff Saboda, Kriad Miller and Julie Brockman, 383 Erickson Avenue, Suite 123, Bainbridge L land, WA 9gl10 were present. Mr. Bullock explained that the applicant is proposing to construct a 71,000 square foot, el -bed stated living facility, which is permitted in the Community Business rune district with a Conditional Use permit. He explained that this application is being processed as a consolidated application and the Hearing Examiner will 6e re wing the ArchimmucA Design Board's recommendation as well as the CoMitional Use PemdL ie Mr, Bullock described the site, stating that it is surrounded on three sides by public right -of --way, with the Was mwazer Treatment Plan[ across the street The shape of the building, which is essentially a cemral section with three wings on each side, allows for some unique landscaping opportunities. The building's design and character keep it from appearing too m Underground parking will be provided with access on the north side of the building. A me meat sign is proposed on the southeast comer rethe site. The building style is a colonial type style and exterior materials include vinyl siding and stucco. Mr. Bullock stated that the proposal meets the City's bulk standaNs. He also reviewed the Code wnh respect to allowed building height, stating that the allowed height is H feet unless the roof has a 3/12 pitch or greater or he ADB approves it as a part of an approved modulated of design. The Board discussed ECDC Section 2010.070(A)6 and (C)3 and how they relate to the proposal. One requires the size and height of buildings to be compatible with the character and existing vi s of the surrounding area; and the other am., be, buildings taller than two stories shall be reviewed [o detemdne the extent to which they will block views from sumou ch t property. Mr. Wright distributed updated elevations and entered them into the record as Exhibit 2 and a sample board of exterior materials as Exhibit 3. Ho described some of the changes, slating that [he entry has been enhanced bl make it more interesting. Mc Wright stated that �heir intent was to emote a financially feasible project that was aesthetically pleasing. He Feels the guideline med the exterior maerials (smeco and wood_Iook . Proposal meets thfa -11 e design ou-ding buildings. The building is well modulated on all four sides and transition of with provides a more human scale. Mr. right of the building. He displayed for the ltm are have mechanical photographs of some of equipment ontheS000`lo, the exterior illustrate the quality cynical work. projects to Boardmemher Chalupmk complimented the substantial exterior modulation and the fact that it is modulated on all four sides of the building. Boardmember Sullivan asked for clarification on the roof and asked how far pitches go up on the side. He stated that elevation A-6 shows that the roof is flat on top. Befelt there was not enough information in the application to make a determination on the roof design. Mr. Wright responded that the roof slopes all the way around with a two foot, six inch overhang, Mr. Sullivan said that it was his mrdecoanding that all portions of the roof must have a pitch of 3l12 or greater. ARachmeut2 FileC"7.115 0 • W M d 11 t� 0) Boardmember Chalupnik sated that he feels the roof modulation does not seem to meet the specified criteria and asked if the building could be lowered to keep the building height at 25 feet. Mr. Wright stated that the tight site limited how far they could drop down for the garage. Mr. Chalupnik said that he likes the building design with the exception of the roofline. Chair Rubenkonig asserted that using the term "assisted living community" on the monument sign might draw undue attention to the building and its residents and create a safety concern. Julie Brockman explained that for marketing purposes it was important to differentiate their building from a regular apartment. She felt that the facilities would be secure and safety would not be an issue. The Board discussed the roofline and Mr. Wright clarified the roofline by drawing it on an elevation. The primary concern was with view blockage and the flat portions of the roof that extend above the 25-foot height limit. Mr. Saboda asked if it would be permissible to mix flat portions of the roof at the 25-foot height limit and sloped portions going up to the 30-foot height limit. Mr. Sullivan said that this would make him more comfortable with the roof modulation. BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER CHALUPNIK, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ADB-97-116 AND CU-97-115 TO THE HEARING EXAMINER, BECAUSE THE BOARD FINDS THAT: • THE APPLICANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ECDC SECTION 20.10.070(A)(4), AND ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDING ARE ADEQUATELY MODULATED; o ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ECDC SECTION 20.10.070(A)(6) AND 20.10.070(C)(3), IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE APPLICANT, IT APPEARS THAT IT COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS; n IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE ROOF AS PROPOSED DOES NOT MEET THE ROOF MODULATION REQUIREMENTS; BECAUSE WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS, THE APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED. ARCHITECTURAL ]DESIGN BOARD STAFF REPORT March 17, 1999 Meeting PLANNING DIVISION *teullock, ISOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: l i From: tICP Senior Planner Date: MARCH 11, 1999 ADB-97.116: A. Applicant Thomas J. Johnston NW Care Management, Inc. 385 Ericksen Ave, Suite 123 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 B. Site Location: 141 Dayton St. Owner Agent/Representative Julie Brockman . NW Care Management, Inc. 385 Ericksen Ave, Suite 123 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 C. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to construct a new 71,000 sq. ft., 81-bed Assisted Living / Independent facility on the property. Fifty-two parking spaces are proposed to be located in an underground parking lot with access to 2nd Ave. S. The project includes a freestanding entry/identification sign. This proposal requires a conditional use permit and public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. Because the City may only require one hearing for any project, the ADB will not hold a public hearing on this issue. Instead, the ADB will hold a public meeting and make a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the project. (Note: The applicant is intending to bring material samples and color renderings to the meeting.) D. Staff Analysis O 1. Site Design: a. Siting: A proposed site plan is included in Attachment 3. With the building located a BC zone with no setback requirements, the building essentially goes from property line to property line. The applicant has stepped the building in and out along its street frontages and in addition, has provided four large patio areas which further break up the massiveness of the building. With the parking under the building, nothing extra needs to be done to screen it from view. b. Landscaping: A proposed landscape plan is included in Attachment 3. A mixture of small and large trees with ground covers and shrubs are proposed throughout the site. All of the proposed landscaping will compliment existing street trees in the area and assist in fitting the building into its surroundings. Attachment 3 File CU-97-116 k O r c. . Dumpster Screening: The dumpster is large enough and adequately screened, but the City's recycling coordinator has concerns about the haulers ability to access it. d. Lighting: Most of the proposed lighting is within the site. Of the few fixtures that could spill light off of the site, those fixtures are located at entrances and exits for safety. A site plan showing the proposed location of the lighting fixtures is contained in Attachment 3. 2. Building Design: The building has a kind of colonial flavor. The shallow pitch gable ends together with the iron guard rails reinforce this perception. a. Exterior Materials: Siding types include a mixture of stucco and horizontal vinyl siding. b. Color: The horizontal vinyl siding will be a beige mixed with a white and beige stucco. The roof is indicated as being a greenish color. c. Shape: The building is a two story, wood frame structure that looks like 2 "H's" smashed together in plan view. The result is a building that contains four interior courtyards and has a substantial amount of exterior walls to give it some interest and variety. d. Views: Some views may be affected from residences to the immediate east, but the applicant is not proposing anything beyond what the code allows. 3. Sign Design: (Freestanding Sign) a. Materials: Wood and stucco. b. Lighting: Directed ground lighting. c. Colors: Grey and white with black letters.: d. Location and Landscaping: The freestanding sign is proposed to be located at the corner of Vd Ave. S. and Dayton St. This entire area is landscaped and more than meets the requirement for a bed twice the size of the sign. e. Sign Area and Height: Proposed Allowed Sign Area t23.5 sq. ft. 32 sq. ft. Sign Height 9 ft. 14 feet 3. Code Compliance: a. Zoning: The property is zoned Community Business (BC). 97116srdoc Required Proposed Building Height: 25 feet (roof only may extend 5 feet 29.25 ft. above height limit if all portions of that roof above the height limit have a slope of 4 inches in 12 inches or eater Lot Coverage: N/A N/A Setbacks: Street = None Street = 4' east 120' south / 4' west Side = None Side = 3' Parking: 1 space per 3 beds 52 spaces total 27 spaces total ...m.xrr.untYtYki'W..i61Usn'.t'YnP.AKti9tlM.'Sd1dYi.+4'NiutrwK4ailbnibq..ww.3....•n ,•...e.. . ,r:. .. ... .-:r i,�!'..L y��. t'. •• , 5 w+'�� �•"�'���.� YX4ieGWYb�A�lf+I1}'+YYYr '�6K91i3�U.d91i�5'v'i?1'i�+1T»s. . 4. Technical Review: The. Engineering Division has provided comments (see Attachment 4). In addition, the recycling coordinator for the City has stated that the current configuration of the garbage i enclosure will not work for the haulers. 2 x i E. Compliance with criteria: In order for the ADB to recommend.that the Hearing Examiner approve this rr a item, the Board must make the following findings: J of 1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies. tN. LtJ�' 2. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. wLL 0 As indicated, the applicant has also applied for a conditional use permit. 3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes of ECDC section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section 20.60, s'd . t sign code. z F+ F. Summary: W w k 1. The proposal is consistent with general Comprehensive Plan policies and the specific policies pt regarding development in the Edmonds Way Corridor. to L r. o H- 2. The proposal is consistent with the bulk, landscaping, and sign standards contained in the Zoning LU w Ordinance. rr _ t " Z Attachments: W F 1. Vicinity Map 2. Application and applicant's declarations z 3. Plans and Elevations' 4. Engineering Division Memo • - 4 '>. 3 idye 97116sr doc Page 3 am o {: i 1 Zu►ningr and Vicinity Map Attachment 1 File No. ADB-97-116 0 :® w f- u. 0 F, f'- w 0 0 LU x w U O z 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 141 DAYTON STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project Proposal Requesting Conditional Use Permit: We are requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Edmonds to build an 81 unit (81 bed) Assisted Living/Independent Facility, located on the property at 141 Dayton St. in Edmonds (Tax Parcel #232703-4-090-0002). The facility will be comprised of one building which will be a Type 5 (rion-rated) two- story wood frame construction (approx. 71,286 sq. ft.) over an enclosed parking garage (approx. 20,485 sq. ft.) A total of 52 parking spaces, including 3 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The total site area is approximately 60,062 square feet. Hearing Process: We request that the project submittal for both the Architectural Review Board and the Conditional Use be processed concurrently at the same hearing with the Hearings Board Examiner. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the comprehensive plan; the property lies within the Urban Growth Area Boundary of the City of Edmonds comprehensive plan; and the property is designated in the comprehensive plan as, and is currently zoned, Community Business (BC). The project's defined use under City of Edmonds Code is as a "Congregate Care Facility" which is a primary use requiring a Conditional Use Permit under Community Business Zoning. Consistency with Zoning Ordinance Community Business (CB) zoning has the following stated purposes: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple dwelling unit(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. The proposed assisted living facility will provide a community service establishment delivering assisted living care to senior citizens. The senior assisted care residential activities will occur chiefly within the proposed building, except for passive recreational activities that would take place on the patios and decks of the building. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1/99 ATTACHMENT 2 I Transferability We and the'land owner request that the conditional use permit run with the land and that the permit may be used by a subsequent occupant of the same property. . rn ® Not Detrimental w t The use will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety andwelfare, or to U. the nearby private property or improvements. The occupancy of the facility by up to 81 G senior citizens with an average projected age of 84 years will have no detrimental impacts x , to public health, safety, welfare or to nearby private property or improvements. This type of facility is generally considered to be a "good neighbor" and highly desirable land use Qj in commercial and residential neighborhoods. Family and friends of the residents are LU g o occasional visitors that park within the parking garage. As an assisted care facility for U W seniors, there is relatively little demand on public services and facilities. o� w W The building design is very architecturally pleasing in appearance. There is a great need Fs.0 for senior services of this type as our population grows older and this 'project would 'j- z; provide a positive addition to the local community and surrounding areas. Following is a W W+ description of the services the Assisted Living facility will provide to the community. r- o " z Licensure The facility will be licensed by the State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Facilities, as a Boarding Home. The application process for a Boarding Home is done concurrently with the development of this facility. Community Approaches to Assisted Living The Community's approach to assisted living is expected to be a combination of housing, personalized supportive services (such as dressing, bathing, medication reminders, meal preparation, and housekeeping services), and health care designed to respond to the individual needs of those who require assistance with activities of daily living, enabling seniors to manage as long as possible on their own. The Community's residential atmosphere is an attractive alternative to health care facilities having an institutional appearance. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc.;1199 2 ,31ot���r -; � NON ,z wi '��Lx.3��,: M..t Description of the Assisted Living Facility The Assisted Living facility will have 81 units licensed under a Boarding Home license issued by the State of Washington to provide assistance with activities of daily living (A.D.L.'s). A.D.L.'s include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, walking, laundry, diabetic monitoring, incontinence management, and medication monitoring and administration. Assisted Living is the fastest growing segment in senior housing in the United States. The Assisted living units will be rented on a monthly basis with a full range of services: three daily meals, all utilities (except telephone), weekly housekeeping and linen service, full-time activities program administered by an Activity Director, scheduled transportation service, 24-hour staff and security, individual heat and air-conditioning, and emergency call systems. The community is designed around a residential -model, not a medical model environment. It is specifically designed to address the needs of the elderly population who have a level of functional limitations, but do not require the intensive care offered at skilled nursing facilities. The community will offer common areas for the benefit of the residents and family members, with a dining room, activity room, and other common areas. Each apartment will have wall-to-wall carpeting, window treatments, and emergency call system. The Assisted Living apartments will have a private bath with shower and a kitchenette containing a two -burner range top and microwave. The following is a list of services that are offered as part of the total service package: • Personal assistance with dressing, bathing, medication administration, and special diets; • Three daily meals and snacks; 24-hour staff, • Emergency call systems in each apartment and common areas; * Housekeeping and linen service; • Utilities; * Daily activities and programs; • Personal laundry services; • Exercise and wellness programs; * Van transportation; • Beauty Shop. The facility will be managed by Northwest Care Management and designed by The Johnston Associates architectural firm. We have been involved in the development, design, and management of several facilities in Washington State of Assisted Living, Retirement, and Alzheimer's Communities. We are looking forward to providing Assisted Care and Independent living to seniors in Edmonds. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1/99 3 U 2 11111�1 111111 • ` nPW � — i1� i iil aj�►r- �i mt._� 1�� III. I� 5���:� :�� miljGL \ EAST ELEVATION o: s• 10' zo r� �I � 1 G E le r� �� i�1G4 9 (' e � ' •G j �E� G.3t�G ! e..• ° iL'i� Gn' : NORTH -ELEVATION ° s 1020• %� SOUTH ELEVATION o• s • .w E^'a " r+ t s -�'.,-*;:..�-'— ; .,.. �` t .., . h<+* m„„�.,. -,.w ,s, i'S ...�dr iYrt. •era �® 3i. '� ':rs„ „'�d'� .+L3�s ��":.wra i!,:�r� ;rn:; m'" r 3,.r., �: , . •.,, t,�`,.. ;., 7 u ARcx,E A. 4�x A w� wnw4RR .�w AS eA9T ANw 9r pBpNR R AmNx SR 104 PARN�x4 wRA4R seerwx'A,m eN.x o,.vAiwx ffERRY HOLOMO LANESI IA" w unur ra+o4Rw � aN 4 ag � xs S �TBFCKs mwcAieo 4xAsre Pux y v au wxc sR a cx +:wu xP wu[o •a+. [ASEns E __-______ _ � ( R ���\ Mltl1T C,LLCU.ATIOtS I� •. +..,., �.,�� wA,w� P4�xr w=x�,NArx,x z \\ i w= w I F,q wl Lo iAcrx��a x4NR4Nr u. �F P CT MFOPMATION z Q I ' PTrok 4 4ARAct .y i j 4 OescW Q _ _. ___ A F nRem H C ---------- ___ I b www.a Rx 4x• _ m12 I I EXISTING EDMONDS x E R o x+ wti y, ( FINANCIAL CENTER O x HTA 73KI N � .... — 41 Rr 2ND.AVENUES. - _ ON x S�N O S w 20 L E ATTACHMENT3 SITE PLAN �Iel� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN y1S NOTI E.1T IS DUE TO THE,OUAUTY OF THE_DOCUMENT._ DAYTON STREET " to ' 3 a ).. a r z m 41 i I i Og OE p 011 E { Rae BF � �kR i. € € €€€€e€€ €€ €S S S S S S S S S S S 5 5 r �MOtOB Al618TED LIVE@G COAMJNTy AxoNrec uw oEacNeoAno�v�w ASSOCATES INC. mwnw [THEJOHNSTON CHITECT9ALA. INTERIOR DESIGNLA AveaN.NO. wI4YWTON ���T� ~ ch Vol LIVING COMMUNITY REVISION CODE DTL/ SHEET COLORED SKETCH DESCRIPTION FREE STANDING SIGN FOR EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING PROIECT C* Date: February 19, I999 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer CD�' Subject: Proposed Assisted Care Facility for Northwest Care Management at 141 Dayto St. (ADB-97-116) (CU-97-117) The Engineering Division reviewed the application. The following comments apply. The Storm drainage concept is approved as proposed. The City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance, must approve for construction, a site plan prepared by a registered Professional Engineer. The existing HDPE pipe parallel with 2nd Ave. S. cannot be driven over without additional structural considerations. The applicant must comply with Ordinance 3013 regarding storm drainage. Show how water and sewer service will be provided to the facility. A double detector check valve assembly may be required as part of the water supply system. Meet Fire Department requirements for location of fire hydrants, construction of fire sprinkler systems, and fire flow. Submit cross section of the driveway egress from the building to the existing alley. Submit detailed drawing of the proposed driveway to the existing alley, show number of parking stalls to be deleted at Edmonds Financial Center parking lot, if any. Maximum driveway slope is 12%. The drawing indicated the slope of the driveway from 2nd Ave. S. to the building is 16%. In addition, what is the width of the proposed driveway? To show one way entry only at 2nd Ave. S., you should construct channelization at the entrance to indicate one way. The one way entry on 2nd Ave. S. will be restricted to right -in only. What is the width and slope of the proposed driveway egress ingress to the dumpster? The proposed traffic mitigation is $3,770.62. Sidewalk and wheelchair accessible ramps should be according to the City of Edmonds standards. Wheel stops will be required in the underground parking spaces. Is the parking garage gated, as was proposed earlier? The Engineering Division will not be responsible for delays or additional requirements that affect the project due to errors, incompleteness, or omissions in the submittal. The Engineering Division reserves the right to make additional comments and requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project. The applicant must comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application, though lacking some required elements of the ADB application, can be considered complete for ADB review. City of Edmonds Development Services Department ©.. ATTACHMENT 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 141 DAYTON STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project Proposal Requesting Conditional Use Permit: We are requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Edmonds to build an 81 unit (81 bed) Assisted Living&dependent Facility, located on the property at 141 Dayton St. in Edmonds (Tax Parcel #232703-4-090-0002). The facility will be comprised of one building which will be a Type 5 (non -rated) two- story'wood frame construction (approx. 71,286 sq. ft.) over an enclosed parking garage (approx. 20,485 sq. ft.) A total of 52 parking spaces, including 3 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The total site area is approximately 60,062 square feet. Hearing Process: We request that the project submittal for both the Architectural Review Board and the Conditional Use be processed concurrently at the same hearing with the Hearings Board Examiner. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the comprehensive plan; the Property lies within the Urban Growth Area Boundary of the City of Edmonds comprehensive plan; and the property is designated in the comprehensive plan as, and is currently zoned, Community Business (BC). The project's defined use under City of Edmonds Code is as a "Congregate Care Facility" which is a primary use requiring a Conditional Use Permit under Community Business Zoning. Consistency with Zoning Ordinance Community Business (CB) zoning has the following stated purposes: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple dwelling unit(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. The proposed assisted living facility will provide a community service establishment delivering assisted living care to senior citizens. The senior assisted care residential activities will occur chiefly within the proposed building, except for passive recreational activities that would take place on the patios and decks of the building. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1199 Attachment 4 Fite CU-97-1I S 0 ® ; S2 r Z a w c� 0 a w LL. U O Z Transferability We and the land owner request that the conditional use permit run with the land and that the permit may be used by a subsequent occupant of the same property. Not Detrimental The use will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or to the nearby private property or improvements. The occupancy of the facility by up to 81 senior citizens with an average projected age of 84 years will have no detrimental impacts to public health, safety, welfare or to nearby private property or improvements. This type of facility is generally considered to be a "good neighbor" and highly desirable land use in commercial and residential neighborhoods. Family and friends of the residents are occasional visitors that park within the parking garage. As an assisted care facility for seniors, there is relatively little demand on public services and facilities. The building design is very architecturally pleasing in appearance. There is a great need for senior services of this type as our population grows older and this project would provide a positive addition to the local community and surrounding areas. Following is a description of the services the Assisted Living facility will provide to the community. Licensure The facility will be licensed by the State of Washington, Department "of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Facilities, as a Boarding Home. The application process for a Boarding Horne is done concurrently with the development of this facility. Community Approaches to Assisted Living The Community's approach to assisted living is expected to be a combination of housing, personalized supportive services (such as dressing, bathing, medication reminders, meal Preparation, and housekeeping services), and health care designed to respond to the individual needs of those who require assistance with activities of daily living, enabling seniors to manage as long as possible on their own. The Community's residential atmosphere is an attractive alternative to health care facilities having an institutional appearance. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1/99 2 ILL Q Description of the Assisted Living Facility The Assisted Living facility will have 81 units licensed under a Boarding Home license issued by the State of Washington to provide assistance with activities of daily living (A.D.L.Is). A.D.L.'s include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, walking, laundry, diabetic monitoring, incontinence management, and medication monitoring and administration. Assisted Living is the fastest growing segment in senior housing in the United States. The Assisted living units will be rented on a monthly basis with a full range of services: three daily meals, all utilities (except telephone), weekly housekeeping and linen service, full-time activities program administered by an Activity Director, scheduled transportation service, 24-hour staff and security, individual heat and air-conditioning, and emergency call systems. The community is designed around a residential -model, not a medical model environment. It is specifically designed to address the needs of the elderly population who have a level of functional limitations, but do not require the intensive care offered at skilled nursing facilities. The community will offer common areas for the benefit of the residents and family members, with a dining room, activity room, and other common areas. Each apartment will have wall-to-wall carpeting, window treatments, and emergency call system. The Assisted Living apartments will have a private bath with shower and a kitchenette containing a two -burner range top and microwave. The following is a list of services that are offered as part of the total service package: • Personal assistance with dressing, bathing, medication administration, and special diets; • Three daily meals and snacks; • 24-hour staff; • Emergency call systems in each apartment and common areas; • Housekeeping and linen service; • Utilities; • Daily activities and programs; • Personal laundry services; • Exercise and wellness programs; • Van transportation; • Beauty Shop. The facility will be managed by Northwest Care Management and designed by The Johnston Associates architectural firm. We have been involved in the development, design, and management of several facilities in Washington State of Assisted Living, Retirement, and Alzheimer's Communities. We are looking forward to providing Assisted Care and independent living to seniors in Edmonds. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc,,1/99 1 0 3 of BoAt 1 CITY OF ]EDMONDS +, ayo 240 SM AVENUE NORM EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) M-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNMCANCE Description of proposal: Construction of a new 81 bed assisted elderly care facility with 65 associated parking stalls. (City of Edmonds Fite No. CU-97-1151ADB-97.116). Proponent: Sunrise Development Inc.,1420 5th Ave, STE 220, Seattle, WA 98101 Location of proposal, including street address if any: i41 Dayton Street. Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will n t act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by ! 2 7 1997. Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date:-- t J 1ti-/ e 7 Signatureg: —I ---V— XX You may appeal this determination to Roberthave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 1Z l Z, ,199�77 by filing a written appeal. citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. xx Posted on _ 1 _'! .1997, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. _xx Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Attachment 5 File CU-97-115 09711SAOC 0. Par10(2 _._.._._ >,t7f ..fit 3 j5 t x-'•`'�,i' k A{ C t t n tWi i. f ti ._....:.-,.w, w'w"w�.w::,.+..:.--+sn�.w,wwe,d.wn�... ,. r^- .,v .+. •.. r•.:• {� `) .` ��'@'i3aA..wta'>k',fY�.,ty#� cn i r_. !f f*Y. Mailed to the following along with the Eavironm' ntal Checklist: , Environmental Review Secdoa — �.....� . Jim Miller y�XK .., Department of Ecology David $vani dt Associates 3, P.O.)Box 47703 1?ld W. Marine View Drive, Suite C Olympia, WA 98504.7703 8vereu, WA 9$20T ¢ x Washington State Dept. of Transportation -- -,- David Segl TSM&PfiAnd Developer Sumise Development Inc. 15700 Dayton Avenue North 1420. Sth Ave, Suite 2200 rc Seattle, WA 98133 Seattle, WA 981.01 pp( U) O 1 r' XX Anthony Roth ... Community Transit I;o4ell-Sauerland &Assoc. w l� :; Attn: Brent Russell III �I 7 r 1133164th Street Southwest, #200 19400 33rd Ave W, Suite 200 to � Lynnwood, WA 98037 r RX_ MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: cn d H 1. THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE OF $2152.00 ts--; , FOR THE IMPROVEMENT TO THE IMMECTiON OF SUNSET AVENUE AND DAYTON STREET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED u�i w` BUILDING. f, a LU Attachments w" fJJ X< pc: File No. CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 oy SEPA Notebook � t= kr ` Pap 2of2 CIJ9h'Ifi.�C1C 1 r= IN is * S l '�^� '>�!' r j, S 15 f I..iswl`miM1.4'Mar ,$.;.�4 �,., ;•. ,.,'.. ;. ,;. 1 .. .r. ..�4 t,.; ,, t.. c H: filar-23-99 03:,53P Northwest Care Mgmt_'„ � ry I c68421794 P.02 WAR J RECEIVED 'No rt Vs Care MA MANAGEMENT, INC. �`1999 Assisted living And Alzheimer's Communities Pt.AMil( is tEpT. March 23, I999 Mr. Steve Bullock, City Planner City of Edmonds Community Services Department, Planning Division 121-5U' Avenue North, 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: ADB-97-116 and CU-97-115 Edmonds Assisted Living Community, 1141 Dayton St., Edmonds, WA. 98020 Dear Mr. Bullock: The unit count for the Edmonds Assisted Living project at 141 Dayton St. is 83 units versus the 81 noted on the conditional use application. This has been taken.into account in the traffic study, which has been completed on a count of 84 units. Please address this with the hearing examiner in order for the unit count of 83 to be reflected for the conditional use decision: Thank you, Julee Brockman Director of Project Development 385 Ericksen Avenue Suite 123 Bainbridge Island, WA 9811 11t Attechment6 File W-97-115 i III li-�-I II h41 I I-i-I II - OI= ii ,_ . ■ �I III ■ 111 � itiT ill l I l I � � � ii l ■ 111 I lI i ,��; � �I l iJ� ■ 11 '�I�1111 O Mar-23-99.05=34P P.03 �) R, E4tirlY�fd MAR 2 3 1999 PLANNIV46 DEPT-. 1- - - --- ,- - - - Tile 1 1 i , I ♦� 1 ----- ----- -------- 1 , �= 2 , ' 1 .. ,----- -------------- ......... 7 1 1 t•• - - ---- - - _ - -- --- - --------------- _ -__I ... ... 1 , 1 1 i i - 1 -- i-•_-- -_�--_ .. ---------- 7 f----------------- - --- 1 r , , 1 , , / 1 , ------ -----' ---------- -- ------- ----+ - -- ---- ' -- - a =1 ,'s tr >, ; j '�;...'t, r, krq� tiPy, s�ii-2- 1 S � S � rs r i r+� r � �' , tt {x r•i, irs r Ik .rr f'"tk r � � i (� t r S., r ,.�...,..,.„¢b ,.e,a..."�., ','.r.`ia�-�fi7� .�`. .BMr• � 't` u y. rt'' 1. t�. �'�!+'' ' ' tiW�+i*re=wrcw``ew:r:.w WY3;�:�NkYi+stxr,:it��ca.,...r Mar-23-99 03:53P Northwest Care Mgmt. i2068421794 P.02 h is RECEIVED (Nort61 I Care � MAMANAGEMENT INC. �231999 Assisted Living And Rlzheimer's Communities PL AN,ujil; OEPT. rLu uJ �f o March 23,1999 Mr. Steve Bullock, City Planner rn U. City of Edmonds w Community Services Department, Planning Division 121-50' Avenue North, 2nd Floor LL Edmonds, WA. 98020 sea z Re: ADB-97-116 and CU-97.115 i ? F-i. Edmonds Assisted Living off' Community, 141. Dayton St., Edmonds, WA. 98020 t- Lu' Dear Mr. Bullock: , a— The unit count for the Edmonds Assisted Living project at 141 Dayton St. is 83 units versus the LU w 81 noted on the conditional use application. This has been taken into account in the traffic study, which has been completed on a count of 84 units. Please address this with the hearing examiner LL 0, in order for the unit count of 83 to be reflected for the conditional use decision. Thank you, 2 Juice Brockman Director of Project Development 0 a f r `s k,a t: Xd" x ,y E h 13"3rT�i� ` . 385 Er€cksen Avenue ,• Suite 123 Bainbridge €s€and,` WA 98110 (toe) 842-0929: • Fax (206) 842.1794 r'R .. vVQ,r L 1'^+kv' hsus;. ,,: ^v,?. Yna+i �.� s ortf voE.st are., MANAGEMENT, INC.. Assisted Living And Alzheimer's Communities R clelyen March 10, 1999 BAR f 1999 �NiytNG p�,�,• Mr. Steve Bullock, City Planner City of Edmonds Community Services Department, Planning Division 121-5`i' Avenue North, 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: ADB-97-116 and CU-97-115 Edmonds Assisted Living Community, 141 Dayton St.; Edmonds, WA. 98020 Dear Mr. Bullock: Enclosed is an update of the public notice address Est of the adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the Edmonds Assisted Living Community project at 141 Dayton St. in downtown Edmonds: Please replace the previous list sent to you, on January .18,4999 with this current list to notice the adjacent property owners of the Architectural ReviewBoard and Conditional Use Permit Hearing scheduled for April 1, 1999. Please give me a call at 206-842-0929 if you have any questions. Thank you, v PJulee Brockman Director of Project Development Enclosure 385 Erickson Avenue Suite 123 Bainbridge island, WA 98110 + (206) 842-0929 Fax.(206)842-i794 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDM[ONDS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 141 DAYTON STREET EDM[ONDS, WASHtINGTON Project Proposal Requesting Conditional Use Permit: We are requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Edmonds to build an 81 unit (81 bed) Assisted Living/independent Facility, located on the property at 141 Dayton St. in Edmonds (Tax Parcel #232703-4-090-0002). The facility will be comprised of one building which will be a Type 5 (rion-rated) two- story wood frame construction (approx. 71,286 sq. ft.) over an enclosed parking garage (approx. 20,485 sq. ft.) A total of 52 parking spaces, including 3 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The total site area is approximately 60,062 square feet. Hearing Process: We request that the project submittal for both the Architectural Review Board and the Conditional Use be processed concurrently at the same hearing with the Hearings Board Examiner. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the comprehensive plan; the property lies within the Urban Growth Area Boundary of the City of Edmonds comprehensive plan; and the property is designated in the comprehensive plan as, and is currently zoned, Community Business (BC). The project's defined use under City of Edmonds Code is as a "Congregate Care Facility" which is a primary use requiring a Conditional Use Permit under Community Business Zoning. Consistency with Zoning Ordinance Community Business (CB) zoning has the following stated purposes: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. C. To allow for multiple dwelling unit(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. The proposed assisted living facility will provide a community service establishment delivering assisted living care to senior citizens. The senior assisted care residential activities will occur chiefly within the proposed building, except for passive recreational activities that would take place on the patios and decks of the building. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1/99 .,777777 ,s, fsr :® N 11 Transferability We and the land owner request that the conditional use permit run with the land and that the permit may be used by a subsequent occupant of the same property. Not Detrimental The use will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or to the nearby private property or improvements. The occupancy of the facility by up to 81 senior citizens with an average projected age of 84 years will have no detrimental impacts to public health, safety, welfare or to nearby private property or improvements. This type of facility is generally considered to be a "good neighbor" and highly desirable land use in commercial and residential neighborhoods. Family and friends of the residents are occasional visitors that park within the parking garage. As an assisted care facility for seniors, there is relatively little demand on public services and facilities. The building design is very architecturally pleasing in appearance. There is a great need for senior services of this type as our population grows older and this project would provide a positive addition to the local community and surrounding areas. Following is a description of the services the Assisted Living facility will provide to the community. Licensure The facility will be licensed by the State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Facilities, as a Boarding Home. The application process for a Boarding Home is done concurrently with the development of this facility. Community Approaches to Assisted Living The Community's approach to assisted living is expected to be a combination of housing, personalized supportive services (such as dressing, bathing, medication reminders, meal preparation, and housekeeping services), and health care designed to respond to the individual needs of those who require assistance with activities of daily living, enabling seniors to manage as long as possible on their own. The Community's residential atmosphere is an attractive alternative to health care facilities having an institutional appearance. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, lnc.,1/99 2. l'51; Description of the Assisted Living Facility The Assisted Living facility will have 81 units licensed under a Boarding Home license issued by the State of Washington to provide assistance with activities of daily living (A.D.L.'s). A.D.L.'s include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, walking, laundry, diabetic monitoring, incontinence management, and medication monitoring and administration. Assisted Living is the fastest growing segment in senior housing in the United States. iCn o The Assisted living units will be rented on a monthly basis with a full range of services: "' three daily meals, all utilities (except telephone), weekly housekeeping and linen service, .; full-time activities program administered by an Activity Director, scheduled U transportation service, 24-hour staff and security, individual heat and air-conditioning, m o and emergency call systems. F4 r z w 0 0 'w x r LL 6; U F- 0 z 0 L. The community is designed around a residential -model, not a medical model environment. It is specifically designed to address the needs of the elderly population who have a level of functional limitations, but do not require the intensive care offered at skilled nursing facilities. The community will offer common areas I for the benefit of the residents and family members, with a dining room, activity room, and other common areas. Each apartment will have wall-to-wall carpeting, window treatments, and emergency call system. The Assisted Living apartments will have a private bath with shower and a kitchenette containing a two -burner range top and microwave. The following is a list of services that are offered as part of the total service package: • Personal assistance with dressing, bathing, medication administration, and special diets; • Three daily meals and snacks; • 24-hour staff; • Emergency call systems in each apartment and common areas; • Housekeeping and linen service; • Utilities; • Daily activities and programs; • Personal laundry services; • Exercise and wellness programs; • Van transportation; • Beauty Shop. The facility will be managed by Northwest Care Management and designed by The Johnston Associates architectural firm. We have been involved in the development, design, and management of several facilities in Washington State of Assisted Living, Retirement, and Alzheimer's Communities. We are looking forward to providing Assisted Care and Independent living to seniors in Edmonds. tv 3 C 1 1 SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED. zR 7. PROJECTS UNDER PRELIMINARY REVIEW r �j01 None d� U 0` 8. CONSOLIDATED PERMIT APPLICATIONS AiD,B-,97 `1161 APPLICATION BY NW CARE FOR A CONSOLIDATED PERMIT REVIEW to U. FOR AN 81-UNIT, TWO-STORY, SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LOCATED OVER A 51-STALL PARKING GARAGE. LL Q Charlie Wright, Jeff Saboda, Kristie Miller and Julie Brockman, 385 Ericksen Avenue, Suite 123, Ln a. Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 were present. z z F " Mr. Bullock explained that the applicant is proposing to construct a 71,000 square foot, 81-bed z o', assisted living facility, which is permitted in the Community Business zone district with a W Lu Conditional Use permit. He explained that this application is being processed as a consolidated � pi application and the Hearing Examiner will be reviewing the Architectural Design Board'sI'll I o recommendation as well as the Conditional Use Permit. F- *UjMr. Bullock described the site, stating that it is surrounded on three sides by public right-of-way, LL r- with the Wastewater Treatment Plant across the street. The shape of the building, which is " . Z}I essentially a central section with three wings on each side, allows for some unique landscaping di C6, v opportunities. The building's design and character keep it from appearing too massive. o E- Underground parking will be provided with access on the north side of the building. A freestanding z monument sign is proposed on the southeast corner of the site. The building style is a colonial type style and exterior materials include vinyl siding and stucco. Mr. Bullock stated that the proposal meets the City's bulk standards. He also reviewed the Code with respect to allowed building height, stating that the allowed height is 25 feet unless the roof has a i 3/12 pitch or greater or the ADB approves it as a part of an approved modulated roof design. The Board discussed ECDC Section 20.10.070(A)6 and (C)3 and how they relate to the proposal. One requires the size and height of buildings to be compatible with the character and existing views of the ' surrounding area; and the other states that buildings taller than two stories shall be reviewed to determine the extent to which they will block views from surrounding property. 0 Mr. Wright distributed updated elevations and entered them into the record as Exhibit 2 and a sample board of exterior materials as Exhibit 3. He described some of the changes, stating that the entry has been enhanced to make it more interesting. Mr. Wright stated that their intent was to create a financially feasible project that was aesthetically pleasing. He feels the proposal meets the design guidelines and the exterior materials (stucco and wood -look vinyl siding) fit well with the surrounding buildings. The building is well modulated on all four sides and the transition of height provides a more human scale. Mr. Wright stated that there were no plans to have mechanical equipment on the roof or the exterior of the building. He displayed for the Board photographs of some of their firm's other projects to illustrate the quality of their work. i c r Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 7 March 17, 1999 ' -Mono"�^ ' F t Boardmember Chalupnik complimented the substantial exterior modulation and the fact that it is modulated on all four sides of the building. Boardmember Sullivan asked for clarification on the roof and asked how far pitches go up on the side. He stated that elevation A-6 shows that the roof is flat on top. He felt there was not enough information in the application to make a determination on the roof design. Mr. Wright responded that the roof slopes all the way around with a two foot, six inch overhang. Mr. Sullivan said that it was his understanding that all portions of the roof must have a pitch of 3/12 or greater. Boardmember Chalupnik sated that he feels the roof modulation does not seem to meet the specified criteria and asked if the building could be lowered to keep the building height at 25 feet. Mr. Wright stated that the tight site limited how far they could drop down for the garage. Mr. Chalupnik said that he likes the building design with the exception of the roofline, Chair Rubenkonig asserted that using the term "assisted living community" on the monument sign r might draw undue attention to the building and its residents and create a safety concern. Julie Brockman explained that for marketing purposes it was important to differentiate their building from zgyp; a regular apartment. She felt that the facilities would be secure and safety would not be an issue. z� g The Board discussed the roofline and Mr. Wright clarified the roofline by drawing it on an elevation. The primary concern was with view blockage and the flat portions of the roof that extend above the 0 F, 25-foot height limit. Mr. Saboda asked if it would be permissible to mix flat portions of the roof at w LUI the 25-foot height limit and sloped portions going up to the 30-foot height limit. Mr. Sullivan said Iz..Lythat this would make him more comfortable with the roof modulation. t+- 0; z! use BOARDMEMBER SULLIVAN MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARDMEMBER w v M CHALUPNIK, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ADB-97-116 AND CU-97-115 TO z r THE HEARING EXAMINER, BECAUSE THE BOARD FINDS THAT: o THE APPLICANT HAS SUCCESSFULLY MET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ECDC SECTION 20.10.070(A)(4), AND ALL SIDES OF THE BUILDING ARE ADEQUATELY MODULATED; ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ECDC SECTION 20.10.070(A)(6) AND 20.10.070(C)(3), IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE APPLICANT, IT APPEARS THAT IT COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS; ' o IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE ROOF AS PROPOSED DOES NOT MEET THE ROOF MODULATION REQUIREMENTS; © BECAUSE WITH THESE MODIFICATIONS, THE APPLICATION IS FOUND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED CITY POLICIES, IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA IN THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-99-13 WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE AGENDA. 9. REPORT ON REQUESTS GRANTED ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL Mr. Bullock briefly described the following applications approved by staff. ADB-99-31 APPLICATION BY ROBERT BOEHLKE (HOUSE WARES) TO REPLACE TWO EXISTING WALL MOUNTED SIGNS WITH TWO NEW PAINTED Architectural Design Board Meeting Page 8 March 17, 1999 0 0'. -' ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD STAFF REPORT March 17, 1999 Meeting PLANNING DIVISION *Thehitec ISOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS To: al i From:ICP Se or Planner Date: MARCH 11, 1999 ADB-97-116: A. Applicant Owner Agent/Representative Thomas J. Johnston Julie Brockman NW Care Management, Inc. NW Care Management, Inc. 385 Ericksen Ave, Suite 123 385 Ericksen Ave, Suite 123 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 B. Site Location: 141 Dayton St. zr� C. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to construct a new 71,000 sq. ft., 81-bed Assisted Living / ui tt1? v Independent facility on the property. Fifty-two parking spaces are proposed to be located in an underground parking lot with access to 2"d Ave. S. The project includes a freestanding entry/identification sign. z This proposal requires a conditional use permit and public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. Because the City may only require one hearing for any project, the ADB will not hold a public hearing on this issue. Instead, the ADB will hold a public meeting and make a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing on the project. f (Note: The applicant is intending to bring material samples and color renderings to the meeting.) ' D. Staff Analysis O 1. Site Design: a. Siting: A proposed site plan is included in Attachment 3. With the building located a BC zone with no setback requirements, the building essentially goes from property line to property line. The applicant has stepped the building in and out along its street frontages and in addition, has provided four large patio areas which further break up the massiveness of the building. With the parking under the building, nothing extra needs to be done to screen it from view. ® b. Landscaping: A proposed landscape plan is included in Attachment 3. A mixture of small and large trees with ground covers and shrubs are proposed throughout the site. All of the proposed landscaping will compliment existing street trees in the area and assist in fitting the building into its surroundings. 97116sr.doc Page I 77, r,T m n a C c. Dumpster Screening: The dumpster is large enough and adequately screened, but the City's recycling coordinator has concerns about the haulers ability to access it. d. Lighting: Most of the proposed lighting is within the site. Of the few fixtures that could spill light off of the site, those fixtures are located at entrances and exits for safety. A site plan showing the proposed location of the lighting fixtures is contained in Attachment 3. 2. Building Design. The building has a kind of colonial flavor. The shallow pitch gable ends together with the iron guard rails reinforce this perception. a. Exterior Materials: Siding types include a mixture of stucco and horizontal vinyl siding. b. Color: The horizontal vinyl siding will be a beige mixed with a white and beige stucco. The roof is indicated as being a greenish color. c. Shape: The building is a two story, wood frame structure that looks Iike 2 "H's" smashed together in plan view. The result is a building that contains four interior courtyards and has a substantial amount of exterior walls to give it some interest and variety. d. Views: Some views may be affected from residences to the immediate east, but the applicant is not proposing anything beyond what the code allows. 3. Sign Design: (Freestanding Sign) a. Materials: Wood and stucco. b. Lighting: Directed ground lighting. c. Colors: Grey and white with black letters. d. Location and Landscaping: The freestanding sign is proposed to be located at the corner of 2na Ave. S. and Dayton St. This entire area is landscaped and more than meets the requirement for a bed twice the size of the sign. e. Sign Area and Height: Proposed Allowed Sign Area t23.5 sq. ft. 32 sq. ft. Sign Height 9 ft. 14 feet 3. Code Compliance: a. Zoning: The property is zoned Community Business (BC). Required Proposed Building Height: 25 feet (roof only may extend 5 feet 29.25 ft. above height limit if all portions of that roof above the height limit have a slope of 4 inches in 12 inches or eater) Lot Coverage: N/A N/A Setbacks: Street = None Street = 4' east ! 20' south! 4' west Side = None Side = 3' Parking: I space per 3 beds 52 spaces total (27 spaces total) 97116sr.doc Page 2 x%ka t+..,..i.u,� �t.:1��utvxirnkwuue:'...i....:.... .�h,.w...y..__ �'�,� r.,�=._,• > ,��s � ,!. ,y x Y:,.,�_� ..�'`' 7YPt� ��>�,,:� '_ ��,r�so-it�a.�. 4. Technical Review: . The Engineering Division has provided comments (see Attachment 4).'In addition, the recycling coordinator for the City has stated that the current configuration of the garbage enclosure will not work for the haulers. E. Compliance with criteria:. in order for the ADB to'recommend that the Hearing Examiner approve this item, the Board must make the following findings: 1. That the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city policies. 2. That the staff has found that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. As indicated, the applicant has also applied for a conditional use permit. 3. That the proposal as approved or conditionally approved satisfies the criteria and purposes of ECDC section 20.10, ADB Criteria, ECDC section 20.12, landscaping, and ECDC section 20.60, sign code. F. Summary: 1. The proposal is consistent with general Comprehensive Plan policies and the specific policies regarding development in the Edmonds Way Corridor. , 2. The proposal is consistent with the bulk, landscaping, and sign standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2: Application and applicant's declarations 3. Plans and Elevations 4. Engineering Division Memo 97116sr.doc page 3 sip► �,�► . 7aninty and Vir-initu Man EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ....141 DAYTON STREET EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Project Proposal Requesting Conditional Use Permit: We are requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Edmonds to build an 81 unit (81 bed) Assisted Living/Independent Facility, located on the property at 141 Dayton St. in Edmonds (Tax Parcel #2327034-090-0002). The facility will be comprised of one building which will be a Type 5 (non -rated) two- story wood frame construction (approx. 71,286 sq. ft.) over an enclosed parking garage (approx. 20,485 sq. ft.) A total of 52 parking spaces, including 3 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The total site area is approximately 60,062 square feet. Hearing Process: We request that the project submittal for both the Architectural Review Board and the Conditional Use be processed concurrently at the same hearing with the Hearings Board Examiner. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan This request for a conditional use permit is consistent with the comprehensive plan; the property lies within the Urban Growth Area Boundary of the City of Edmonds comprehensive plan; and the property is designated in the comprehensive plan as, and is currently zoned, Community Business (BC). The project's defined use under City of Edmonds Code is as a "Congregate Care Facility" which is a primary use requiring a Conditional Use Permit under Community Business Zoning. Consistency with Zoning Ordinance Community Business (CB) zoning has the following stated purposes: O A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community. B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings. D C. To allow for multiple dwelling unit(s) as a secondary use to the business uses. The proposed assisted living facility will provide a community service establishment delivering assisted living care to senior citizens. The senior assisted care residential activities will occur chiefly within the proposed building, except for passive recreational activities that would take place on the patios and decks of the building. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc., 1/99 ATTACHMENT I Transferability We and the land owner request that the conditional use permit run with the land and that the permit may be used by a subsequent occupant of the same property. Not Detrimental The use will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or to the nearby private property or improvements. The occupancy of the facility by up to 81 senior citizens with an average projected age of 84 years will have no detrimental impacts to public health, safety, welfare or to nearby private property or improvements. This type of facility is generally considered to be a "good neighbor" and highly desirable land use in commercial and residential neighborhoods. Family and friends of the residents are occasional visitors that park within the parking garage. As an assisted care facility for seniors, there is relatively little demand on public services and facilities. The building design is very architecturally pleasing in appearance. There is a great need for senior services of this type as our population grows older and this project would provide a positive addition to the local community and surrounding areas. Following is a description of the services the Assisted Living facility will provide to the community. Licensure The facility will be licensed by the State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Facilities, as a Boarding Home. The application process for a Boarding Home is done concurrently with the development of this facility. Community Approaches to Assisted Living ® The Community's approach to assisted living is expected to be a combination of housing, personalized supportive services (such as dressing, bathing, medication reminders, meal preparation, and housekeeping services), and health care designed to respond to the individual needs of those who require assistance with activities of daily living, enabling seniors to manage as long as possible on their own. The Community's residential atmosphere is an attractive alternative to health care facilities having an institutional ® appearance. 2 Description of the Assisted Living Facility The Assisted Laving facility will have 81 units licensed under a Boarding Horne license issued by the State of Washington to provide assistance with activities of daily living UJ' (A.D.L.'s). A.D.L.'s include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, walking, laundry, diabetic monitoring, incontinence management, and medication monitoring and o o' administration. Assisted Living is the fastest growing segment in senior housing in the Yi United States. o The Assisted living units will be rented on a monthly basis with a full range of services: three daily meals, all utilities (except telephone), weekly housekeeping and linen service, �j full-time activities program administered by an Activity Director, scheduled transportation 24-hour service, staff and security, individual heat and air-conditioning, a == and emergency call systems. The community is designed around a residential -model, not a medical model environment. It is specifically designed to address the needs of the elderly population who have a level of functional limitations, but do not require the intensive care offered at skilled nursing facilities. !IJ The community will offer common areas for the benefit of the residents and family r Z1 members, with a dining room, activity room, and other common areas. Each apartment will have wall-to-wall carpeting, window treatments, and emergency call system. The N Assisted Living apartments will have a private bath with shower and a kitchenette containing a two -burner range top and microwave. The following is a list of services that are offered as part of the total service package: • Personal assistance with dressing, bathing, medication administration, and special diets; • Three daily meals and snacks; • 24-hour staff; • Emergency call systems in each apartment and common areas; • Housekeeping and linen service; • Utilities; © • Daily activities and programs; • Personal laundry services; • Exercise and wellness programs; • Van transportation; • Beauty Shop. ® The facility will be managed by Northwest Care management and designed by The Johnston Associates architectural firm. We have been involved in the development, design, and management of several facilities in Washington State of Assisted Living, Retirement, and Alzheimer's Communities. We are looking forward to providing Assisted Care and Independent living to seniors in Edmonds. Prepared by Northwest Care Management, Inc.,1/99 3 I J a; Y,f y k . .,.: ' u nccxireoww arts c�,w Sfl I04 vnxc ww.ce aecrrn,'nxo x»a , a'OwrtlaoNc �er&ra I or . rnx srm w.x m,G Td�wGPAPHY �� � �.vr2ue I ziE o'� ,xs W umf I �a O w I W = ¢ N 1 i I rxu eutwx� xe,cx* scs 02 � � al z i x PROJECT INPoR nON Qi Z zyc ' r 5 , .. a 1 b , w .wxw s Knox. E- z ---- 1 EXISTING EDMONDS FINANCIAL CENTER mo s OO S < � b D 1 q4TL o ea a —�� F 2.2 2ND AVENUE S. - �, S �.L/ ry o s l0 20 of3 33 C 66u �.. ATTACHMENT 3 SITE PLAN n �, �.'�hs�'�.�.,� emu•' �'e�e��� � , ��x,�e� 77`'i,'4Y f i t. �� x� y'I� ' 4 _,_.,....u:.. SR 104 IfEAgY NOLONf; LhtFSI S� 2F jil ,. :.. _. Oa B+ I. EXISTING EDMONDS Z L FINANCIAL CENTER w s x � I NmrsrooxnwNc El E K � $onn 2ND AVENUE S. v W 5 N o io so EXTERIOR LIGHTING AND SIGN PLAN i 20 p .� _ARM r I �9d 3 $69 --------------------------------------------------- -------------------J_.._ %n1 EAST ELEVATION S 10' ®20' n ®.� a� m— ELEVATION o• S- 10• 20' Q u NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN TO THE�AUALITY OF THE,DOCUMENT�. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD APPLICATION EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 141 Dayton St., Edmonds, WA. 98020 ADB-97-116 STATEMENT OF NECESSITY OF A FREE STANDING SIGN It is critical to the Edmonds Assisted Living facility marketing plan to have a freestanding sign for advertising purposes. This is necessary in order to create public awareness as to the type.of housing we are providing. It is particularly important that the public understand the building is not an apartment or condo complex, but is specifically senior housing. The building fronts two main streets in addition to the ferry waiting area. To put a sign on the exterior of the building would not be effective or noticed. We have proposed the location of the sign at the corner of P Ave. and Dayton St. A landscaped area twice the size of the sign area will be provided at the base as required. Please refer to the attached colored sketch of the proposed sign. We feel this sign will be attractive in appearance and add to the streetscape. e F� Vt Q d O O 1-3 ( I 1 j7V !r N THE JOHNSTON ASSOCIATES INC 375 ERICKSEN AVE. #222 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND WASHINGTON 98110 12061 842-7641 FAX 842-0727 PROJECT EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY REVISION CODE DTL/ SHEET COLORED SKETCH DESCRIPTION FREE STANDING SIGN FOR EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT PROJECT 0'R$04 SCALE 1/2" DATE 1/22/99 DRAWN 'KM SKETCH • SIGN Date: February 19, 1999 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Subject: Proposed Assisted Care Facility for Northwest Care Management at 141 Dayto St. (ADB-97-116) (CU-97-117) The Engineering Division reviewed the application. The following comments apply. The Storm drainage concept is approved as proposed. The City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance, must approve for construction, a site plan prepared by a registered Professional Engineer. The existing HDPE pipe parallel with 2nd Ave. & cannot be driven over without additional structural considerations. The applicant must comply with Ordinance 3013 regarding storm drainage. Show how water and sewer service will be provided to the facility. A double detector check valve assembly may be required as part of the water supply system. Meet Fire Department requirements for location of fire hydrants, construction of fire sprinkler systems, and fire flow. Submit cross section of the driveway egress from the building to the existing alley. Submit detailed drawing of the proposed driveway to the existing alley, show number of parking stalls to be deleted at Edmonds Financial Center parking lot, if any. Maximum driveway slope is 12%. The drawing indicated the slope of the driveway from 2nd Ave. S. to the building is 16%. In addition, what is the width of the proposed driveway? To show one way entry only at 2nd Ave. S., you should construct channelization at the entrance to indicate one way. The one way entry on 2nd Ave. S. will be restricted to right -in only. What is the width and slope of the proposed driveway egress ingress to the dumpster? The proposed traffic mitigation is $3,770.62. Sidewalk and wheelchair accessible ramps should be according to the City of Edmonds standards. Wheel stops will be required in the underground parking spaces. Is the parking garage gated, as was proposed earlier? The Engineering Division will not be responsible for delays or additional requirements that affect the project due to errors, incompleteness, or omissions in the submittal. The Engineering Division reserves the right to make additional comments and requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project. The applicant must comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application, though -lacking some required elements of the ADB application, can be considered complete for ADB review. City of Edmonds ATTACH,M tNT 4 Development Services Department Notice of Development Application & Hearing Examiner Hearing Date of Notice: March 17, 1999 File # CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 Name of Applicant:.......... NIN Care Management & EFCA, LLC Date of Application:......... January 26,1999 Date Application Complete: March 11,1999 Project Location: ... .......... 141 Dayton Street Requested Permits and Approvals: .. . .............. Conditional Use Permit Other Required Permits not yet applied for (if known): ................... Building Required Studies related to the project:. — .......... Unknown Project Description:......... Conditional Use Permit to allow an Rotated Environmental assisted care seniors hous facilit , Documents :............. _...-- Critical Areas Checklist & State 9 y Environmental Policy Act The project would also be subject to the City's design review proms. Public Comments Due:...... April 1, 1999 9:00 a.m. Subject property is zoned Community City Contact: ............. Steve Bullock Business (BC). Public Hearing Information '' Date: April 1, 1999 Time: 9:30 a.m. place. City Hall INtg., Rm. 3i0 Fl. #304,121 s Ave. N. information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Development Services Department, 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 (425) 771 0220 All public comments must be in writing and sent to this address Th decision o th s de 1 pine t ppl c t 1t be ode w thin 120 days afthe dale fthelelterofC p! t ss w7lh allowan mad fo smd es and add`rtr 1 rxformalJan requfuls.,No(Nole that ab 1 tyt Epp arndaoisiqkis a t7ngent>iponpaN ctpat open the p rm t d r p oa s The removal, mutilation, destruction, or concealment of this This notice may be removed Warning! notice before the hearing date isa misdemeanor punishable by after: April 1. 1999 Tine and imprisonment. I Residing at APO.docXL-XTemp\foans ;mu 232703-1.04UC04 OCCUPANT OR CAMERELLI-S 170 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS. WA 98020 232703-1.04S.0004 OCCUPANT 192 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-VO45400A 0 ICE & JAM 1 UITE 123 E S, W 8020 232703-4-080.0004 EDMONDS LUMBER COMPANY & HARDWARE 228 ; TH AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-081-OD03 PORT OF EDMONDS 160 W. DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 96020 232703.4.085-0009 NELSON, MARVIN R AESLIE A. 209 DAYTON ST., #101 EDONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-089-0005 NELSON, MARON R. /LESLIE A. 209 DAYTON ST., #101 EDMONDS. WA 98o20 232703.4493-0009 LORETTA LIND 222 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 2701-1.04S.0004 UPANT OR GOLDIES 180 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS. WA 98020 232703-1-0434004 OCCUPANT OR THAI PARK 182 SUNSETAVE. EDMONDS, WA 88020 232703.1.045.0004 OCCUPANTIRACEWAY HOBBIES 184 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-046.0004 OCCUPANT OR THE ASSOCIATES 184 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS. WA 98020 232703 -045-0004 IS 1 , SUITE 119 DS, 98020 232703-4-080.0004 BARKER, FLOYD S JANET 815 9TH AVE. N. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232702-4-082-00002 OCCUPANT 146 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-087-0007 OLYMPIC DRIVE ASSOCIATES 1233 OLYMPIC DRIVE EDMONDS, WA 98026 232703-4-092-0000 IOCCUPANT/PINKHAM'S PILLOW 202 3R0 AVENUE S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4.096-0007 RALPH SORENSEN .222 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 98020 2g —�WS-M 00,PANT GR THE LACEMAKER 17$ SUNSETAVE. EDMONDS. WA 06020 OCCUPANT OR HOMESTYLE LAUNDRY 184 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 08020 232701-1.04S-0004 OCCUPANT/WATERFRONT ANTIQUE MALL 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONOS, WA 98020 232703.1-045.0004 OCCUPANTIACCENT DESIGN INTERIORS 190 SUNSET AVE., SUITE 111 EDMONDS. WA 98020 232703.4481-0003 Occ P $0. BLDG. #3 110 EOM , W 8020 232703.4-082-00D3 MILLER, ROBIN L. 81 CAROL 17358 BEACH DR. NE SEATTLE. WA 98155 REST .4.087.007 01 RF_SI 223 j EDM A�88020 2270 9A t PL3D8046-1548 FULL 11 11 4540-002-013-0002 LCM 144 RAILROAD AVE.. #204 't. EDMONDS, WA 98020 r w 450-00 01 8 a; & DELORES Co j E DS, 08020 cfn O g 464N -005- d D , PTNSHP. NC r E. 1000 S ,W 98121 r � z r; O 45 9-001.0 OC w W, 2 cscn}- DS A 98020 0 ��tF _ 6464-000-001-0005 r F; • °` HELDE, ERLINE & M.A. 2' 210 3RD AVE. S., #A '3 EDMONDS, WA 98020 Zi U,, r z 6464.000.004.0002 WILLIAMS. DONALD & PATRICIA 210 3RD AVE, S. #0 EDMONDS. WA 08020 IKIIF] 6782 000-103-0007 TELFORD. RICHARD & BLISS 200 JAMES ST., #103 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6782-000-106-0004 MCMANUS,STEPHEN P. 0. BOX 91006 SAS0701 SEATTLE. WA 96111 6782-000-201.OWO ARGENT, CAROLL B. 200 JAMES ST., 0201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ,� f. f t r .:.: ........:�..................... v...... .:«.... ..._«.«_.»» .,. ..-.1 t '-3/d<YNWa2uv.er.+.1+..r...n.... ". 45488-002-001.0000 .._._.�.a............-re.esaaysYtlSefwd4iM} OCCUPANT/ALASKA NW PURL. NORHAWK INVESTMENTS, INC. 130 2NO AVE. S. 120 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 00020 ' 4S48.002.013-0002 4548-062-017-0008 OCCUPANTIOPTIMUM PRECISION RIO PETROL, INC. 110 MAIN ST. 100 2ND AVE S., #11 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 WOND96020 454 1-0 -0002 3RD A LA7A LTD PTNSHP 202515 VE., 01000 SEATTP. 4KA 98121 4548-001.020-0005 4548-001-23-0002 HOPPER, HAROLD & CAROLEE 530 BELL ST.. SUITE 1000 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6464-000-002-0004 AUST, DOROTHY G. 210 3RD AVE. S., #B EDMONDS. WA 90020 6782-000-101-0009 JENSEN STERLINE V ET UX 200 JAMES ST., #101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782 000-104-0006 YOUNKIN, MERRILL & DOROTHY 200 JAMES ST., ##104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-107-0003 x L0t 200 EDM . WA 98020 6782 000-202-00007 SEABORG. HAROLD & EWE 200 JAMES ST., 0202 EDMONDS. WA 98020 454&0014X"006 TINDALL, THOMAS R. 126 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS. WA 98020 4648-001.017.0000 MAR BEL MARBLE. INC. P.40. BOX 1449 EDMONDS. WA 9802C 454MOI-023-0002 OCCUPANT/SEA MOUNTAIN INS. 1312NO AVE. S.. #C EDMONDS. WA 98020 6464-000-003-0003 GARRISON, REV. LIVING TRUST 210 3RD AVE. a, #C EDMONDS, WA 980200 6782.000.102-0008 HOOD. WILLIAM a., JR. 200 JAMES Sr., #102 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6782-MNIOUODS HASSON. ROBERT & MARCELLA 200 JAMES ST.,11105 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6782-000-108-0002 BALLARD, RONALD & LORETTA 200 JAMES ST., #108 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000-203.00006 PARKS. THOMAS D. 200 JAMES ST. #f203 �E EDMONDS, WA 98020: �sL�Yx iT'R "ME t'" ��3`gbari'4"`'s. 2c'i`f cti s ;I•.. � A.c. 6782-000-402-0005 6782.000-403.0004 6782-000-404-0003 BRUNSVOLD, S. K. GREGERSON, BARBARA A. HAMMERSLA, WILLIAM D. 200 JAMES ST., #402 200 JAMES ST., 0403 200 JAMES ST.. #404 EDMONDS, WA, 98020 EDMONDST, WA 98011 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782*DS.' W2., #405E A 98020 6782-000-408.0009 FARIS, KENNETH & SHIRLEY 200 JAMES ST., 9408 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876-000-201-0003 TUCKER, RICHARD 8 DOROTHY 114 2ND AVE. S., 0201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ESID00.202• 2 1162 EDMO WA 20 6782-000-406.0001 GRANT ELWAr, DOROTHY 200 JAMES ST., #406 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7878-000-100-0005 MARINER PLAZA 20148 2STH NW SEATTLE. WA 98177 7876-000- 1-00 R I 1 1 E S, W 020 7678-000-203-0001 WAGNER, M. JOS 114 2ND AVE. S.. #A EDMONDS, WA 06090 6782-000.407 00 CAR l RUST 200 7 EOM S, 98020 7876-000-100-0005 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S., #100 EDMONDS, WA 96020 7876-000.202-00002 ERWERT. WILLIAM 114 2ND AVEN S., #1202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7678-000.20M RE 116 ED . WA 8020 9 8139.000.003.00 0 15 EO NDS, ' 98020 6139.0150 00- 1-000 E EDM . W 98020 e 8139-000-202-000 RE 0 18 02 ED • W 020 8641-000-IM0007 DEWAR MEETKS $ EKEM PC 110 JAMES ST., STE 100 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8841-WO.202.0004 FRANCIS KNIGHT 110 DAMES ST., STE 202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641.000.205.0001 HARRY & MARY NYHU 110 JAMES ST., STE 205 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641.000-302.0003 THOMAS & BETTY MAHAN 110 JAMES ST., STE 302 EDMONDS, WA 98o20 8641.000.100-0007 MICHAEL MOSS, CPA 110 JAMES ST., STE 100 EDMONDS, WA 90020 8841.000-103-0004 KMJ INTERNATION, INC. 110 JAMES ST., STE 103 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ('BE 9.000.002-0005 13 SAN EO S. vtlA M�� n 8139-0QO.004.0003 WIGGINS, JACK & KAREN 152 3RD AVE. S., #1D EDMONDS, WA 98020 8139-000.102-00 RESIDE 1 2 E A ' aozo t 8139.000.216-0009 MEEKS, JOHN N. ETAL 16W3 HENITZ AVE. SE MONROE. WA 98272 8841-000-200.0000 STAFFORD CREATIVE, INc. 110 JAMES ST., STE 200 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8841-000-203-0003 CYNTHIA CHAMBERLAIN 110 JAMES ST., STE 203 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8641.000-300.0005 ]EFF GALBRAITH 110 JAMES ST., STE 300 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8641-000.303.0002 VIRGINIA REDFIELD 110 JAMES ST., STE 303 EDMONDS, WA 88020 8641-000-101.0008 SINGULARITY CORPORATION 110 JAMES ST., STE 101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000.104.0003 MILLERIRUSSEL & ASSOC. 110 JAMES ST., STE 104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 813....3-0004 TILTON. MICHAEUCHIYOKO P.O. Box 191397 FORT WORTH, TX 76121 8139.00O-10t-000 8939.000.102-M. V813003 E,3f�9 8139.000. 01.000 `i ID i 1 ED 89 39 0 ala0806 W20 8641-000-201-0005 KEN & STEFANIE HALVAS 110 JAMES ST., STE 201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8841-000-204-0002 MFANG & DIANE NOS 110 JAMES ST., STE 204 EDMONDS, WA 9802o 8841-000.301.0004 TERRI SACCO 110 JAMES ST.. STE 301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ss41.600,30aoo01 RESIDENT 110 JAMES ST. STE $04 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641.000-f02-0005 THE HOTEL GROUP 110 JAMES ST.. STE 102 EDMONDS. WA 98020 ...� ��u�ir"'0a"N0" tl .1tn'(}'�Y ..+s.'w+r..t,L tt��==ee••�//yy��//y���__//{y��//�� 'iWWARSMITH & CO. ky�.. 1.000.108-0000 �.� - OkT �^ xS ` !10 ST:, AMERICAN MORT CO. D�N lNStI�tANCEAGENCY' . . JAME3 STE 108 110 DAMES ST.i STE 108 4i4 � 51:,.WE 119 EDMOND% WA 98020 EDMONDS, ilVA `88020 ` . EOMONDS. WA 98020 i . 4 CIE � cn tu-` cn '0 ac z t�- t— Q{ �Q v �a � H LU ' N u.. p Z �ii t!h c.� y 0 z a. J t, FILE.NO.: CU-97-115 APPLICANT: NW Care NOTICE OF HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) I, Karissa Kawamoto, first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: That on the 17th day of March; 1999, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance, and in any event, in the Civic Center and the Library. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 124 5 day of 19 y� NOTgR Notary Publi�inand for the St Washington. p� AVgGfC Residing at t dYgg« 1� e '' ?:r yi �;"nt �-es!" Z. t� A} g:.j1;i-ir +. 29'z1s }s> ;'yx.x t,+��t ('�'ti;U..3s%"fR >i"'1'1...:. ✓ t t R 4Y ar >lMej n7 ,nth .:siaaf 'S S,xY.v1r'^i�`�ri.:ir Vv st �,�u} Fs'rS y;�5 sf d�W °4Xs�C ifi }� �n' `ha s y J dvj .t. 3 ak i.s�as! II i f ±y .4's `F _ _ a r t t < FILE NO.: CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 a APPLICANT: NW Care UJ 0I o� NOTICE OF HEARING v N uJ(: J h` c AFFIDAVIT' OF MAILING W LS U. z STATE OF WASHINGTON} s� �- 3:: z E--. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH} 0LLI o ti 1, Diane M. Cunningham, first duly sworn, on oath, depose and say: =v LL z That on the 18th day of March, 1999, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was v s mailed as required to adjacent property owners, the names of which were provided by the applicant. z Signed- t/LQc a,tk c Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19,9 t 9 { pNJE S. Ap f sioHCO \1oTq,9y �Z Notary Publi�inand �fbr e Sta f ashington. � PUS c �T �� t2.3-zo o Residing F oo WASH�� 1;,r� ,'-_ '., r-�, { sc •s ,r.'}'+„��l{�x����ah�}���,,,���t_t��;�,vt��'�t{�.�j� '�F'5, �.' RSCS VED Affidavit of Publication MAR 2 2 1999 PLANhr'Nu W'V. STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, The undersigned; being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of - Everett, County of Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ........................................ .......... ... .................. Anthony.... Jones....................................................................................... ..........Project Na ........AP-99-38 .................................................................... a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: March 17, 1999 ............................................................................................................................ ..t .......... ........................ ................................................ ..:................................... hat did newspap was regal ly dis ributed to its subscribers ;\all of said period. ...........::... ..,..... ................i...., r .� :.. .................. cipal Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this ......... 1 t.h dpn of.......�....,,,MarC 1 � .....�( ..:.... �.................. 19..... Notary Public in and fort a Stat of Washington, residing at Everett, Snoh ' h C unty. :jo NOTARY PUBLIC C S-2-1 Name of Applicant: Project Number. Project Location: Project Description: City Contact: Public Comments Due By: Name of Applicant: Project Number: Project Location: Project Description: City Contact: Public Comments Due By: Name of Applicant: Project Number: Project Location: Project Description: City Contact: Public Comments Due By: Name of Applicant: Project Number: Project Location: Project Description: s� City Contact: L ' Public Comments Due By: NOTICE OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING & NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Anthony Jones AP-99-38 23029 Highway 99 Appeal by Anthony Jones, President of Route 66 Cars & Trucks, of a Notice of Civil Violation and accompanying fines issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official for multiple violations of the Edmonds Community Development Code in association with an auto sales business located at 23029 Highway 99. Jeannine Graf April 1, 1999; 9:00 a.m. Richard Passey CU-99-21 825 Bell Street Application for a Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in the basement of the existing single-family residence. The house is within a Single -Family Residential (RS-6) zone. Kate Galloway April 1, 1999; 9:00 a.m. Helleren Homes P-99-7 20509 Maplewood Drive Application for a five -lot formal plat. The subject property is approximately 2.20 acres and is zoned Single Family Residential RS-12. Karissa Kawamoto April 1, 1999; 9:00 a.m. NW Care Management;, 'CU 97'.1:15/ADB=97-116 141 Dayton Street Application by NW Care Management and EFCA, LLC/Mark McNaughton for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an Assisted Care seniors housing facility. This project would also be subject to the City's Design Review process. Subject property is zoned Community Business (BC). Steve Bullock April 1, 1999; 9:00 a.m. r rx www w* *w*www -COMM. ONAL- ww w*w*ww**w*www**» DATE. MAR-15-196. TIME,15:02 *w* P.O1 MODE -.MEMORY TRANSMISSION - START-MAR-15 15;01 END-MAR-35 15:02 FILE NO.- 206 STN NO. COM AHER NO. STATION NAME/TEL.NO. PAGES ' DLRATION, 001 OK <OS> HERALD 003/003 00:00147" .-CITY OF EDMONDS - xwwwww**ww*w*wwwwwww*ww*»wwwwwwwwww -DEU SERU DEPT - w*w* - 425?7f0221- ww*wwxww* Cifty of Edmond :.. Community. Services !Department -b" Building -Planning -Engineering 121-5th Avenue North * 2nd Floor Edmonds, DIVA 98024 Phone: (425) 771-0220 FAX (425)771-0221 F,A►X COVER PAGE To: Laresa Knowles From: Shada Graham . Herald Planning Division CITY OF ` EDMONDS BARBaRA MAY R MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11,1999 TO: Architectural Design Board Applicants FROM: Steve Bullock, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Architectural Design Board Agenda and Staff Report Your application has been determined to be complete and has been scheduled for the March 17th Architectural Design. Board (ADB), Meeting., Enclosed are an agenda and staff report for the ADB meeting. Please find your item on the agenda. A representative must be present for each item, including the Consent agenda. The Board often moves items off the Consent agenda and onto the regular agenda. if a representative is not present, the Board will not act on the item. Please note the statement at the top of the agenda. You must obtain sign permits building permits and any other required permit from the Building Division in addition to obtaining approval from the ADB. The review by the ADB is not a substitute for review of building Pe Its, and an approval by the ADB does not grant construction approval Please carefully read the staff report pertaining to your item. If you find any errors, missing information or if you have any questions, please call me at 771-0220 before the meeting. It is important that items going to the Board be as complete and clear as possible in order to avoid confusion during the meeting. If the Board does not understand your project, they may not approve it. ]ER' MONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD METING AGENDA MARCH 17,1999, at 7:00 P.M. z City Hall - 3rd Floor Meeting Room, No. 304 . _ 121 5th Avenue North �— W w� u REVISED AGENDA (nUj LU n o 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Q 2. READING AND/OR APPROVAL OF MINUTES:. Meeting of Marsh 3,1999. . d. 3. REQUESTS FROM TIME AUDIENCE — Limited to 3 minutes each (items not appearing on' the r agenda) s+ z 4. CONSENT AGENDA: r—F a. FILE NO. ADB-99-15; Application by the City of Edmonds to add an antenna for police and fire. vehicles on the existing monopole at 8505 Bowdoin Way. Request includes constructing an`equipment U ( ; cabinet adjacent to the pole in the Multiple Residential "RM-2.4" zone: F=, b. FILE NO. ADB-98-198; Application by Chambers Cable for two new budding mounted signs which = c` 'i have approximately 100 square feet in area. The business is located at 190 W. Dayton, Suite 201. �L- z ' 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS — MINOR PROJECTS: Cn U a. FILE NO. ADB-99-50; Application by Horizon Bank for installation of new building mounted signs p at 131— 5a' Avenue S. in the Community Business "BC" zone. z b. FILE NO. AD199-30; Application by Prince Cleaners to replace an existing wall mounted sign composed of individual letters with'a cabinet sign. Sign am will be a replacement amount. The i business is located at 21110 760' Ave. W. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS — MAJOR PROJECTS: a. FILE NO. ADB-99-10; Application by Holy Rosary Parish for an expansion of the existing school to add two new classrooms, new school administration offices. and upgrade and modernize the existing facilities. The school is located at 760 Aloha Street. p 7. PROJECTS UNDER PRELIMINARY REVIEW: No Items 8. CONSOLIDATED PERMIT APPLICATIONS (No Public Participation): a. FILE NO. CU-97-1151ADB-97-116; Application by NW Care for a consolidated permit review for new 81-unit two-story senior assisted living facility located over a 51 stall parking garage. The subject C project is located at 141 Dayton Street and is zoned "BC." b. FILE NOS. ADB-99-13 & V-99-14; Application by Meyer Sign. & Advertising for Chevron. _Sign package includes 2 cacwash single face signs, l single face channel letter food mart sign, 24 hour vinyl graphic, 1 freestanding, double face, illuminated sign and 6 non -illuminated "snap frame point-Ofsale PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE ACCESSIBLE FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (Contact the City Cterk at 771-0245 with 24 hours advance noticef6r special accommodations) . AD8 A6 031M.D=11-MMM 0 �� I rl- C (Contact tine City Clerk.at 771 'OM5V' ith V boars advance notice for sgOct Auei�araFr�:oocitt.auass Yit.FBRARYIPF.AMtikfAAfiRNnAA%At ffiAcmwnAR , - .V1 L01 lX* P _.,LIPATION RO ' UTING, FORM FILE �:/du-91,1 I 4N 0 CHECKLIST.: 'FRO PLANNI =r PARKU RECREATI()Iq 'RETURL,b ROUTED TO. Engineering 2/4/99 ne Engineering F1 2/4/99 _LL_. Fire: Public Works .2/4/99 Public Works Staff Comments- *PIERVIIIIAT SECTION OF THE COPE COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT CONSIDER'Ell). *Additional Information Req.ulred for Complete Appiiica tti on *Additional Studies Required.to Complete Review • Owner— Northwest Care Manaeement. Inc. (Formerly Sunrise Diveloiarrient) Property Address 141 Dayton St. Date of Applicatio, • Type Resubmitted for final approval of 8 1 -unit assisted living facility • Hearing Required: Yes— X No Date of Hearing (if known) A X Application Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) ----.Fee !—site Plan XApo List x 1 egals(Existing & Proposed) Title ReDort .2L_�_Envlronmental Assessment x vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year occupancy (ADU): X _—Elevations _Declarations (Variance), Pefiffon (Official Street Map) Environmental Checklist Critical Areas Determination 0 ■ -. Al 101 RECEIVED A APPLICATION ROUTING FORM, FlLE :. CU-97-11 SIADS-97-1 IFIB 4 gg . AN 'CHECKLIST: FROM: PLANINING' RD QEPT, ROUTED TCl: RETURNED Engineering_ 214199 Engines Fire ubllc Works 2l4/99 Public, ks Parks tat Rec. 214J99 Parks ' St Rec. Staff Comments: C 6e1,S -S N,hL- toe: �s * PER WHAT SECTION OF THECODE? V FG 90 2- . *COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BUCOTISIDERED. *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to Complete Review • Owner Northwest Care Management; Inc (Formerly Sunrise Development) • Property Address 141 Dayton St. • Date of Application 1 /22/99 • Type . Resubmitted for final approval of 81-unit assisted' living facility ' • Hearing Required: Yes X No Date of Hearing (if known) i X Application s Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 z 11) Fee X &ite Plan X APO List X - Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report X Environmental Assessment X vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) X Elevations Declarations (Variance) Petition (Official. Street Map) Environmental Checklist ? Critical Areas Determination . E LIM M APPLICATION ROUTING FORM 'C'HECKLIST FILE CU-97-4 I S/ADB-97-116 j 1.'AND ROK -:PLANNING `-. ROUTED TO: 1 RETURNED Engineering-' '2/4/99 Engineering Fire 2/4/99 Fire o I, W-A Public,Works FEB Rec. 2/4/109 Parks a Ric. Staff Comm6nis: Al&-o oe 1,e.j&A- Ztj,4reA —Z V&- a A10T- xt6� 6611c,f2CFE021 rOX- *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED—_ *Additional Information Required for Complete Application *Additional Studies Required to, Complete Revi&w, • Owner Northwest Care Management, Inc. (Formerly Sunrise Development) • Property Address 141 Dayton St. • Date of Application 1/22/99 • Type Resubmitted for final approval of 81 -unit assisted living facilky • Hearing Required: Yes X No Date of Hearing (if known x Application --—Sjte Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) Fee -L_Site Plan x APO List jj_Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report -K,_Environmental As sessment 1 —-Vicinity Map ----�--Pro6f of 2-Y6ar Occupancy (ADU}, X _Elevations ----,—Declarations (Variance) —Pefition (Official Street Map) Environmental Checklist., ? _Critical Areas Deteffnination I. 0 APPLICATION IROUTINGPItM F '09 FILE ,�, -CU-97-4 I 51A=16 ' 71.4 :M46ADHECKLIST FROM" PLANNO� -Os�r D ROUTED TO: .:RETURNED Efiginieting Fire Works Parks, all ROC. 2/4/99 Parks,& Rec. Staff Comments: 6,eF V .,*PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *CbMWNTSVITHOUT CI T TIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Co ple#e'Ap'plication *Additional'Studies Required �e RevIeW i d to Comple. • Owner Northwest Care M namement, Inc. (Fonnerly Sunrise Develo6ment) • Property AddressIILDa to --- y i St. • Date of Application _1/22/5 9 • TypeL Resubmitted for final at moval of 8 1 -unit assisted living facility a Hearing Required: Yes. X 1 No Date of Hearing Of'known) x Application L.,�"Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) —Fee X Site Plan X APO Ust 1--Legaiis (Existing & Proposed) Title Report x • _Environmental smen Asses x Vicinity Map —: Proof of 2-Year Ompancy (ADU) x Elevations L—�eclarafions,(Variance) Petition(Official Street Map) 1. Environrnental:Checklist Critical Areas Determination ...... IE Im tj ti 1 J 4� I 1 ,.»««_.._.._ _.,__,...».e.....w.�e.:...-.w.•aw..,,.....na,�.,,u.werxea.e-x*ec is sya:x.:..q �.nw..,«..,.,++.......,-.,.... ._ _„ Date: February 19, 1999 To: Planning Division From: Gordy Hyde, Development Services Engineer Subject: Proposed Assisted Care Facility for Northwest Care Management at 141 Dayto St. (ADB-97-116) (CU-97-117) The Engineering Division reviewed the application. The following comments apply. The Storm drainage concept is approved as proposed. The City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance, must approve for construction, a site plan prepared by a registered Professional Engineer. The existing HDPE pipe parallel with 2nd Ave. S. cannot be driven over without additional structural considerations. The applicant must comply with Ordinance 3013 regarding storm drainage. Show how water and sewer service will be provided to the facility. A double detector check valve assembly may be required as part of the water supply system. Meet Fire Department requirements for location of fire hydrants, construction of fire sprinkler systems, and fire flow. Submit cross section of the driveway egress from the building to the existing alley. Submit detailed drawing of the proposed driveway to the existing alley, show number of parking stalls to be deleted at Edmonds Financial Center parking lot, if any. Maximum driveway slope is 12%. The drawing indicated the slope of the driveway from 2nd Ave. S. to the building is 16%. In addition, what is the width of the proposed driveway? To show one way entry only at 2nd Ave. S., you should construct channelization at the entrance to indicate one way. The one way entry on 2nd Ave. S. will be restricted to right -in only. What is the width and slope of the proposed driveway egress ingress to the dumpster? The proposed traffic mitigation is $3,770.62. Sidewalk and wheelchair accessible ramps should be according to the City of Edmonds standards. Wheel stops will be required in the underground parking spaces. Is the parking garage gated, as was proposed earlier? The Engineering Division will not be responsible for delays or additional requirements that affect the project due to errors, incompleteness, or omissions in the submittal. The Engineering Division reserves the f" right to make additional comments and requirements on forthcoming submittals for this project. The applicant must comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application, though lacking some required elements of the ADB application, can be considered complete for ADB review. City of Edmonds Development Services Department `a I IF, E APPLICATION ROUTING FORM ; ':FILE.': , `CU-97-1151A!36-97-916 AND CHECKLIST FROM: "' PLANNING ` ROUTED TO: RETURNED Engineering 2/4/99 Engineering Fire 2/4/99 Fire Pu6I1c WOriq 2/4/99 Publtc Worm, Parks at Rec. 2/4/99 Parks Bz Rec. Staff Comments: *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE *COMMENTS WITHOUT.CITATIONSVILL'NOT BE CONSIDERED *Additional Information Required for Complete Application t *Additional Studies, Required to Complete Review i 1 i • Owner Northwest Care Manaeement. Inc. (Formerly Sunrise Develonment) • Property Address_. 141 Dayton St. • Date of Application 1 /22199 i • TypeResubmitted for final approval of 81-unit assisted iivine facility i i • Hearing Required: Yes X No Date of Hearing (if known) X Applicafion Site Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11) , Fee X - Site Plan X APO List X Legals (Existing & Proposed) Title Report X Environmental Assessment X Vicinity Map Proof of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU) .' X Elevations Declarations (Variance) Petition (Official Street Map) Environmental Checklist :-,.: . ? Critical Areas Determination t� R11 0 Al 42- land use applicaflon J9 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD ® COMP PLAN AMENDMENT ADS-q?- l i(A CONDITIONAL- USE PERMIT CU-cl7-1 l5 ® HOME OCCUPATION ® FORMAL SUBDIVISION CI SHORT SUBDIVISION CI LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CI OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT! STREET VACATION ® REZONE 0 SHORELINE PERMIT ® VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION CI OTHER FILE # ZONE DATE t RECD BY FEE RECEIPT# HEARING DATE HE CI STAFF O PB ;'ADB CI CC ACTION TAKEN: ® APPROVED ® DENIED. CI APPEALED APPEAL# Applicant _NOP-14WEST CAP-'E M-4A1AGC-O'IENT Phone _(2t 1) ��/�. f'qZq Address 3f35 E-01CV42Eti! Avg. lsbme 129 Property Address or Location _ I HI -GAY VON <-IT. e-DPYtD f JD -S. WA-. 9 0020 Property Owner E•F74C•A% L-L.C. Phone Address TO• ZOX 1251 , E17M0fJDS1 W4. 1$020 Agent t06emcr-r" Phone r2410 84Z --7& e41 Address _315 EZIGksEly NEN(A15, 155Ui 71F 123+�GI )AgRl o Tax Acc #- -73,070S -GL 4220--C2CaO2 Sec. 2g Twp. 07A/ Rng 03 � Legal Description •a`^' i✓t�-r ej:t?f3Cf� Details of Projector Proposed Use GONUiTi0N40L_ L?Slr- t%.s�YYtiT F02 q 161 UNIT' sc- N 1 0le- Ass s-ye t> t..i V I N Are t t .c'C `r' I N "1'iA1Q STe Y �'ttct?G-Cy2E OV'2 �f}�1tJC� �Ar2A,6 51Qktt�y PAGES aQE v20o,U �a'l 'iDS iSI I2cst+aENT,� i ik �'TisTfi, STD r- c=; ZS r2�S�i N A6tER YEA-�s 01= 4615_ The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the application agrees to release, Indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorneys fees, arising from any action or Infraction based in whole or In part upon false, misleading, Inaccurate or incomplete Information fumished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or employees. The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purpose of Inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT Q, N r�� r Aort6oct Carr MANAGEMENT, INC. Assisted Living And Alzheimer's Communities Jan, 21, 1999 01 (0 C uil Mr. Steve Bullock, City Planner nt City of Edmonds Cn U. 0 Community Services Department, Planning Division W 2 � 121-5t" Avenue North, 2nd Floor 1:31 Edmonds, WA. 98020 Mi UP Re: ADB-97-116 and CU-97-1 IS Z Edmonds Assisted Living Community, 141 Dayton St., Edmonds, WA. 98020 1--i � q ui W! Dear Mr. Bullock: 0 T We are requesting that the Assisted Living project at 141 Dayton Street in Edmonds (ADB-97- a t 116 and CU-97-115) be scheduled for final ADB approval and public hearing on the conditional LU LU M use permit before the Hearing Examiner as soon as possible. This application will be updated u. 01 under the name of Thomas Johnston of Northwest Care Management, as the applicant. The owner remains to be E.F.C.A., L.L.C., with Mark McNaughton as their representative. Enclosed are the updated Conditional Use Permit application requirements and Architectural Z Design Board Application requirements per a new building design for the assisted living facility comprised of 81 beds similar to the design completed by Sunrise Development on the project: Conditional Use: 1. Updated Application form 2. Project Description 3. Public Notice Address List 4. Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Issued on the project 5. Site Plan (11"x 17" reduction) Architectural Review Board: I Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Issued on the project 2. Public Notice Address List 3. Approved Critical Areas Determination 4. One (1) reduced copy of project plans per requirements 5. Five (5) sets of all large Project Plans per requirements 6. Eight (8) sets of all colored drawings 385 Ericksen Avenue Suite 123 • Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 • (206) 842-0929 • Fax (206) 842-1794 :wlvl-ff Z Ki >cn > cn d En Z 0 -3 C.0 Zt7 -4 %01 Z 0 0 THE JOHNSTON ASSOCIATES INC. 375 ERICKSEN AVE. #222 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND WASHINGTON 98110 1206)842-7641 FAX 842-0727 PROJECT EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY REVISION CODE DTL/ SHEET COLORED SKETCH DESCRIPTION FREE STANDING SIGN FOR EDMONDS ASSISTED LIVING PROJECT PROJECT 9 a 0 (o SCALE 1/2" DATE 1/22/99 DRAWN KM SKETCH SIGN _J .... ..... . w. 0 t13� �I3¢5�•_�:- IFa �.riwn .gsl?4'Ih� '!... �9ut !•ik Era �atil4_ .J�la[d �•�= eua - .. :�+ie�tiai.—x�.0 j f 8onn.."REM MIP mom Rom Ell OTI am. _%..Yid �x RI MR m g SOUTH ELEVATION °` 5' to, aoQ � �� '�, � i��� : i'._r.�[ �',� III �� n .1 I�� ! d�.�g •y � ��•� 0 3� �%��v �� �t�e i e �� _ i law" vU o �_ N���101111111110VIIIIIII'16N�! I�Illili�llllllllll@tllllll�i(�I�G �®�ii��f�� "I IIIU[I i�� ��i �; '�,s' �?�'� �r�;i� + 2 DMWNG ONECTOM re gay A$ ' - SR 104.. _.; IFEMY HOMM LMES) i or < crva srtB Rux x�BswxBB crw vnnox l V L 11 � 6ETSACKS a sA Ax S - itll#I `- HEIGHT cALcuarwHs � . In Im- I O w¢I m I .oua. Ao no uE ox, PROJECT WMIATION axAl ° ----- ------------' " i EXISTING EDMONDS d 3 �+ I FINANCIAL CENTEREl uRAxcn eo u, v ,. Ama • AOOei A� ws° � N1 . w.a, am ate' w.w. + awiw"e a�U"r°"0 ex IM x W.M. 72% y e.nn „� a -BEOROOn Ss S88 �. �m 2ND AVENUE S. rWue 29 H qg 43 Aol2 2 It�: R� w ,3T CCU!?T E e SITE PLAN x� Al it i q I i 1 4 I SR 104 (FEW HOWMMi I.ANEii N mu — U uzp � b F M W aI 02 Z' O § O EXISTING ED FINANCIAL CENTER ENTEfl z 2ND AVENUES 'ht2 tv°9' s�H oios av�vo gu€ r E 8 EXTERIOR' LIGHTING AND SIGN PLAN I SOUTH ELEVATION ol 51 to, 20' goo J.r.'12 2 7A 4 %n1 EAST ELEVATION 0' 1* 10' 20' ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WEST ELEVATION ol 51 10, 20' igo �7 C""i 7A R O 99 d� �� �$ �� �� :� F @W Za 3 g�. .:,:.... •:. 3 ... �:.,. ,....: �t DAYTON STREET i � Y p� 1 z i i x 5� i pp�j fpEdg oil 0i, y � i S V g � .i 0 8 1 li I� e j N y€ mA1 ASSOCIATES INCwNmxEVEwCHITECTSINTERIOR MC LHEJOHNSTON DESIGNERSlA10 WA4NctaN rmme+z-re�ii ME Pt. N6.MD. m. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST,. W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AND DAYTON STREETS IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS; THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1 18'22" E. A DISTANCE OF 263.88 FEET; THENCE N 88 41'22" W. A DISTANCE OF 231.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR-104, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND FROM WHICH INTERSECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS S 72 52'59" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND CONSUMING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 27'11", AN. ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED RADIALLY TO THE L LINE, OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; THENCE S 23 25'27" W, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE AND 80 FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE S 1 09'15" W, 80 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO. SAID L LINE, A DISTANCE OF 106.83 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 21+75; THENCE S 44 26'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 28.10 FEET. TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+00 AND 30 FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THECENTERLINE OF DAYTON STREET, THENCE S 88 41'22" E, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, A DISTANCE OF 249.74 FEET TO -THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF' FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST,. W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AND DAYTON STREETS IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS; THENCE WEST 338 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 1 18'22" E. A DISTANCE OF 263.88 FEET; THENCE N 88 41'22" W. A DISTANCE OF 231.24 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR-104, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER 2141566, SAID MARGIN BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND FROM WHICH INTERSECTION POINT THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS S 72 52'59" E; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND CONSUMING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 27'11", AN. ARC DISTANCE OF 82.49 FEET TO A POINT 100 FEET EASTERLY, AS MEASURED RADIALLY TO THE L LINE, OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+00; THENCE S 23 25'27" W, A DISTANCE OF 61.26 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE AND 80 FEET EASTERLY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 20+68.17 P.T.; THENCE S 1 09'15" W, 80 FEET EASTERLY AND PARALLEL TO. SAID L LINE, A DISTANCE OF 106.83 FEET TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 21+75; THENCE S 44 26'45" E, A DISTANCE OF 28.10 FEET. TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER STATION 9+00 AND 30 FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THECENTERLINE OF DAYTON STREET, THENCE S 88 41'22" E, ALONG THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF DAYTON STREET, A DISTANCE OF 249.74 FEET TO -THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET THEREOF' FOR ROAD; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. E_ X Mr. Jamal Mahmoud, PE Traffic Engineer Community Services Department Engineering Division City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Northwest Care - Edmonds Assisted Living Facility Traffic Impact Analysis "Ag I LIN 711111111�� ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS / PLANNERS / DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS January 5, 1999 LSA No. 4014 The purpose of this letter is to provide traffic information regarding the Edmonds Assisted Living Facility proposed by Northwest Care, an assisted care facility designed for up to 84 units to be located in downtown Edmonds. The following traffic impact analysis is an update of the traffic analysis prepared for a previous proposed facility at this same location. The proposed building location is north side of Dayton Street west of Second Avenue. The proposed structure will have two occupied stories and a lower level dedicated to parking. The front of the building faces Second Avenue where the building garage entrance to the lower parking level is located. The parking exit will be located on the north side of the building where exiting traffic Will access an existing alley. Existing Street System The proposed facility abuts Second Avenue, Dayton Street and Edmonds Way (SR-104). No direct vehicular connection will exist with the adjacent stretch of SR-104 which acts as a holding area for the Washington State Edmonds -Kingston Ferry. The other two surface streets will have direct access. These streets provide access to the various commercial sites and residences in Edmonds. 0 A number of the major downtown arterials routes are under the jurisdiction of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). These roadways include SR-524 beginning at the ferry terminal and consisting of Main Street west of Third Avenue and Third Avenue north of Main Street. SR-104 begins at the ferry terminal and proceeds south on Edmonds Way west of the proposed project. SR-104 provides access to SR-99 and 1-5. A spur of SR-524 begins on Third Avenue at Main and includes Third Avenue to Dayton and Dayton to Edmonds Way. Trip Generation The total number of vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project were determined using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 1991. The expected trip generation is based on the number of beds and rooms for -the residents of the proposed building space. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. 19400 33rd Ave. W., Sulle 200, Lynn%wd. WA 98036 800-775-7663 425-775-1591 425-672-7998 fax N Mr. Jamal Mahmoud January 5, 1999 Northwest Care, Inc. Traffic Study Page 2 Traffic is primarily generated by employees, visitors and deliveries. The expected trip generation from the proposed building is shown in Table 1. Total Average Weekday Daily Traffic (AWDT) Assisted Nursing Care, 84 units @ 2.60 ADWT per unit .................. 218 Total AM Peak Hour Trips Nursing Home 84 units @ 0.19 ADWT per unit ......................... 16 Inbound Trips .......... ............. 10� Outbound Trips ................................................ 6 PM Peak Hour Trips Nursing Home 84 units @ 0.17 ADWT per unit ........................ 14 Inbound Trips ................................. 8 Outbound Trips ............................................ 6 (1) Trip rates from ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, Land Use Code 620, Nursing Home. Trip Distribution The projected trip distribution for the 218 ADT and 14 P.M. peak hour trips generated by the project is shown in on Figure 1, Trip Distribution. Since trip generation is primarily staff and visitors, most of trip distribution is expected to be on arterials accessing areas of residential land use. The trip distribution indicates that half of the traffic will access the site via SR-104 south of Edmonds. The remainder of the traffic is expected to travel by major routes to and from north, major routes to and the east, and a smaller portion diffused through the City of Edmonds surface streets. No segment of the WSDOT road system will have 10 or more project generated AM or PM peak hour trips. Mr. Jamal Mahmoad January 5, 9999 Northwest Care, Inc. Traffic Study Page 3 Traffic Mitigation The City of Edmonds has a traffic concurrency mitigation program whereby the City has identified projects designed to maintain an acceptable ' level of service within the City. Accordingly, the fee charged by the City, $269.33 PM peak hour trip, is designed to provide funds to complete capital projects to maintain traffic within the City to an acceptable level of service. Traffic mitigation is provided for trips within Edmonds and is therefore based on 8 P.M. peak hour trips. On this basis the -fair share traffic mitigation fee is $2,152. The applicant agrees to traffic mitigation for this amount. This letter constitutes a voluntary offer. The intent of this voluntary offer is to achieve a determination of nonsignificance for traffic related impacts: It is understood that this money would be held by the City and utilized to assist funding of projects within the sphere of impact of this project. Sincerely, g wAr Dale B. Watkins, P.E. , a3ss5 �q •e+ �'cist�'� 0� 3/1 SITE PLATY SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. L 1 \ �ea WCRNTy MAJA Q any roao " � taou. nasear.nar arnR �« a.�su n 7 >H `4°A""i.w'^ E D�_ C"'C �2 nT NN' _, :•" c.-,au7'`� ri III " w Y r,r" o�.'y Y'^ a" r a e s "�13G2{ i V p EXf WfG TQoOC 7APNY SEC7K.W24 701 Mr27M14A{ RAM+l9EA3T, WAL MI ' .81 u, Ff ( FERRY HOLDING LRN gv� •• `\`� ��I � �� it � 1 � � ..,,. __,,_._..�.,„._._:.----�- �t�9� �•�;� l sg a.___ ___ __a ri 1 �• vI I� ; � i 1 1 ,� 1 i �' � e ra _ r N Eo - - - - - - - - ;'�Y.Irr SECTIONS A DETAILS - _.. - -- - - - - - --- - -- - -- - -- - - a -- - - - - - - - - -------- ---- ----- m- - - - - - -- - -- - - - --- - - --- ------ L-----------'---- - ---- -- -- -- ---- --- _ g SECTION A -A a mrcausr _--_n------------------------------------------------ ------- r _- Igopg Ill 96CTION B-8 sms_a.s_ im rd UTILITY & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN � IIpI�I� c�c SECTION. 29 TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE S EAST, W.M. AI Ems 0 GRADING PLAN SEC77ON 28, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M. FERRY H—INC!'--. --------------- 71 .• r 1a 1 1 '"`� fF '� tits j tY"1'��, k1 lc. > � .', . A 1 ,, i i X ,tr }i[ �Y �r Q i7 I 1 Y N' \lf{ qp BDyO .�A �a t CITY OF EDMONDS l90 250 SM AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) M-0220 Fes- UJi RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) �! _m oGATED U oIf MITIDETERMINATION OF NONSi GNIFICANCE 0 LU W X i J Description of proposal: Construction of a new 81 bed assisted elderly care facility with 6S associated parking stalls. (City of Edmonds File No. CU-97-11S/ADB-97-116). U. c g Proponent: Sunrise Development Inc.,1420 5th Ave, STE 220, Seattle, WA 98101 J LL Location of proposal, including street address if any: 141 Dayton Street. a, U Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS z E-r; Z The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the w w, environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was p! made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file lead to with the agency. This information is available to the public on request. + o H w ua There is no comment period for this DNS. x v, LL 01 XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will n t act on this proposal for 15 days from Uthe date below. Comments must be submitted by / Z 7 1997. 0 r Responsible Of icial:Jeffrey S. Wilson z Position/Tide: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 q = : Date: t + z- ce-7 _ Signature: ., XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, ® Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than /Z ! — .19971 by filing a written appeal citing the . reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on I_fr'�i Public _t�l ,1997. at the Edmonds Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklists {` h' 'r2or. CU4fUS.DOC Page I oft s i r ` is ., }.r 5i ?r ��jJ r_.}..''.� �`C rt,.`�_.,. C \ t,......:.....; � $ �- ........z..�..-..�..w.sw ..r„t 3. •}�•`-, wa.. Matted to the fallowing along with the Environmentai Checklist: ' . Bin; Wei _., Environmental Review Section David Evans &Associates } , Department of Ecology + i .1716 P.O; Box 47703 W. Marine View Drive, Suite C Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Everett, WA 9=1 Z 4. '� F� X XX Washington State Dept of Transportation X' David Seal TSM&PAAnd Developer Sunrise Development Inc. F' ear` 15700 Dayton Avenue North 1420 Sib Ave, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98133 Seattle, WA 98101 vp� V t�' N XX Community Transit Anthan Roth y Russell Lovell-Sauertand & Assoc. J F t 133 Brent l I33164th Street Southwest, #200 19400 33rd Ave W, Suite 200 us' U. , Lynnwood, WA 98037 ; —0 Uj XX MITIGATING c_n � MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL: • _ I. THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO, CONTRIBUTE A TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE OF $1152.00 Z M.; FOR THE IMPROVEMENT TO THE INTERSECTION OF SUNSET AVENUE AND DAYTON ' O� STREET PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED f BUILDING: v vs Attachments ur tw.t F=-, U- Z( pc: File No. CU-97-1 WADB-97-116 LLJ SEPA Notebook r aF 2r tlt' li Page 2 of 2 - a :'' _ CU97113boc Date: To: From: Via: Subject: MEMORANDUM November 11,1997 File No. CU-97-115/ADR-97-116 John Bissell, Senior Planner Jeffrey S. Wilson, Responsible Official ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 81 BED ASSISTED ELDERLY CARE FACILITY WITH 65 ASSOCIATED PARKING STALLS- FILE NO, CU-97-115/ADB-97-116 I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmental checklist, site plan, landscape plan, building elevations, and traffic study which have been prepared for the project. A copy of these documents are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that a mitigated determination of nonsignificance be issued for the project. A traffic study prepared by Lovell Sauerland & Associates has revealed an impact to the level of service of the intersection of Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue. The applicant has calculated the subject project share of improvements to that intersection. The City concurs with the calculations presented by the traffic study. Based on my review of all information and adopted policies of the City, I am recommending that the proposal be changed or clarified to include the following mitigating measures so that a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) can be issued. Recommended Mitigation Measures: 1. The Applicant is required to contribute a traffic mitigation fee of $2,152.00 for the improvement to the intersection of Dayton Street and Sunset Avenue prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the proposed building. This recommendation is based on adopted policies of the City as found in the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), Title 15. Specifically, the following apply: Policy The City of Edmonds Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan discusses Level Of Service in Chapter 2. Page 32, of Edmonds Transportation Element states that "Edmonds Arterials will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better." City of Edmonds ca Planning Division CU971,sa.= Iu12M. A. BACKGROUND L Name ofproposed project, if applicable. - Sunrise Assisted Living Conditional Use Permit 2. Name of applicant; Sunrise Development, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Mr. David Segl Contact: Anthony Roth Sunrise Development, Inc. Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc. 1420 Fifth Ave., Suite 2200 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98101 Lynnwood, Washington'98036 Telephone: (206) 224-2881 Telephone: (425) 775-1591 4. Date checklist prepared: August 29, 1997 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is anticipated soon after granting of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP). 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, orfurther activity related to or connected with this proposal? Ifyes, explain. None beyond construction of a 67 unit assisted living facility, parking garage, outside parking and utilities. 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Conditional Use Permit Site plan 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Ifyes, explain. Neither the applicant nor contact person know of any such pending applications, beyond the instant application. .�::.. . � " :_:...._._a.....::.:.�.........,.e:�...�xvciv.. mr�vu.,unua•»>ar+slee,....:..w�....+..��...._W..,.-:-:....__.. ,.. .. :...: 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, f known. Conditional Use Permit Approval - City of Edmonds 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site, There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects ofyour proposal, You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. {Lead agencies may modem this form to include additional spec fic information on project description.) The requested CUP is to allow for construction of a two-story, 67 unit assisted living facility over an enclosed garage. A total of 67 parking spaces, including 4 spaces for handicapped parking, will be provided. The existing -vacant 9,500 square foot building will be removed. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information far a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, ##,known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, ifreasonably available. While you should suBmit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailedplans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The instant proposal is located west of the ferry holding lanes (SR 104), east of 2nd Street and north of Dayton Street in the City of Edmonds; in the southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 27 North, Range 3 East, W.M., Edmonds, Washington. A legal description and vicinity map are included in the instant application. TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I EARTH a, General description of the site (underline one): jyak rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The development area is a flat paved area and building occupying approximately 44 percent of the site. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The development area on the site is flat. c. Wlrat general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? Ifyou know Ilse classiation of agricutturalsoils, speck them and note any prime farmland The development area of the site is paved and based on soils classification mapping presented in the Soil Survey of Snohomish County, Washington (USDA Soil Conservation Service), the site's soils are classified as Urban Land. v tq i d Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils In the Immediate vlcinity? Ifso, describes No indications of unstable soils are apparent. c Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading ii proposed Indicate source of fill: This request is for conditional use permit only. Grading will be limited to removal of paving and installation of utilities: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?. If so, generally' describes None is anticipated. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Building and impervious coverage is estimated at 80 percent. It. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if. any: - No such impacts are anticipated. Z AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from file proposal (le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project Is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Automobile emissions will be generated by traffic to and from the site during construction and subsequent occupation. Amounts of dust and air pollution generated by the project will be minimal and insignificant. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describes Vehicle emissions from adjacent streets. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other Impacts to air," if any::" None are proposed. ` 3 r, z w U 0 0 w U. w U O z 1 0 3. WATER IL Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or In the Inumediate vicinity of the site (Including ,year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Ifyes, describe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or river It, f lows into. None in the immediate vicinity. 1) Will the project require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans The project will not require work in or over any surface water body. 3) Estimate the amount of fall and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source offill material No rill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from any surface water body as part of this project. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are planned as part of this project. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year ftoodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 10 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge No discharge of waste materials into surface water is proposed. b. Ground: 1) Willground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals ...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general site of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 4 �. Ott ji d2 i��S }F'}il i 4i ti 4,il ,'S ti t 7G J Y ry Y .F tvll "} t; i ........wiw«:�.+r.w...wr...:..-.. .. Jam. ,.. ........._+,::.:f..�.. .....w.w.i «... ... ,.f .._ . J The wastewater collection for the proposed project will be provided by the City of z 'j Edmonds. No domestic waste material will be discharged into the ground. F Us c. Water Runoff (including storm water): o' J V4 n Describe the source of runo f rincluding storm water) and method of collection and � of disposal, fang include quantities, if known). Where will this waterflow?" Will this Lui; water, flow into other waters? Ifso, describes � um—, U. The principal source of runoff will be rainwater and snow melt from the roofs and g, parking areas on the site and discharge will be to existing receiving facilities. M 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe zts- . A typical component of stormwater from roads and parking areas is petrochemicals p� and the products of internal combustion engines. Stormwaterrunoff from impervious w ws surfaces will be collected and discharged to existing facilities, consistent with current Is of uses. 501 g F Domestic sewage service will be provided by the City of Edmonds. d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, grounds and runoff water impacts, u_ p( fany; �i LU No such measures are indicated. o - z ' A. PLANTS a Underline types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: _ evergreen tree. fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs } ,x— grass pasture ®_ _ crop or grain —wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage. other: _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. none :. _ other types of vegetation h. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ®> The majority of the existing grass lawn will be removed. . J S .;® - -;:.- }, i s5�1.aia '4jif,.ft''kF;R Jf j ,�, ..,® s f a t f J' .a v n. t r1 a r} 7 -�' Uf a 9> 'LL �ti a t t r 4 t to tl J trM'a 1 `';t"t '" i Ydi' i "t 4 y•t ii �J h.-' t 1 r 3: t c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to. exist on or in the vicinity of ; the site. d Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve, or cc enhance vegetation on the site, if any: U of New landscaping will be provided with an emphasis on appearancetreatment of the CO.tu al frontage along SR 104. wt C I ANIMALS L¢ & Vnderline any birds and animals which have been observedon or near the site or are s a; known to be on or near the site; z F;' birds; hawk, heron, eagle, Sgtrgbirds. other: typical small northwest birds and z O? seabirds L Wj mammals; deer, bear, elk, beaver, other; none nm� fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. none F b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site UJ S W No threatened or endangered animal species are known to exist on or in the vicinity x� of the site c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. z The subject property is not known to be part of a migration route: d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, ifany; No such measures are proposed. ? 6. ENERGYAND NATURAL RESOURCES ® a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used far _ heating, manufacturing, eta ? EIectrical energy will be used for lighting and appliances and natural gas is available t, for space and water heating. ® t; 6 b. Would your project affect Ilse potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No such impacts are anticipated for this project. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are Included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None beyond the new energy code for energy demand, insulation and infiltration. Z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH rz Are there any environmental health hazards, Including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk offire and exptosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None are anticipated. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required Standard police, fire and emergency medical services in the event of accident, fire or unusual emergency event. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Meet all City of Edmonds provisions for fire and life safety. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, aircraft, other)? Noise from traffic using adjacent roadways provide the principal source of noise at the site and the Burlington Northern Rairoad rails are two blocks to the west, but with standard construction, no related impacts are anticipated. 2) *W at types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a tong-teron basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: Sources of noise will be construction activity and related traffic and will be limited to Monday through Saturday 7 AM - 7 PM. Long-term: Human activity and related traffic will be expected to generate noise in the completed project. Noise will occur associated with peak traffic hours of the day. 7 N LL a W x t- u. UJ U H 0 Z Nl 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: • Tt 'I Short-term; Construction activity and related traffic will be limited to Monday through Saturday 7 AM to ? PM. Vehicles will use properly maintained exhaust systems, and engines will be turned off when not in use. Long-term: Residential occupation is not anticipated to ,result in a significant noise increase on the site. 8 LAND A" $HDRELM USE ` a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently occupied by a vacant office building. The ferry terminal waiting lines are to the west. Across Dayton Street to the south is the City ofEdmonds Sewage Treatment Facility. To the southwest is a bank, within Harbor Square. To the southeast is the Driftwood Players. To the east, across 2nd Street, is an office building and a condominium. A condominium is adjacent to the north. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describes No agricultural uses have occurred in the recent past. G Describe any structures on the site. A single -story office building is located on the site. , d Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures will be removed. e Wlsat is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned BC (Community Business). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Edmonds Comprehensive flan designates the site as Downtown Activitiy Center (Mixed Use Commercial). g. If applicable, what is Ilse current shoreline master program designation of the site? There is no such designation of this site. s h. Has any part of the sue been classed as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, sped z No. L Approximately how many people would reside or work In the completed project? LAJ U. - d O; c �! A total of 81 persons are anticipated to reside in the completed project. A maximum � �! of 15 persons will be anticipated to work during peak times in the completed project, cn o with a total of 25 persons in the workforce. ; w J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? d None will be displaced. = z t- k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, ifany: o' UJ uj{ F None are required or proposed. o : pl b Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected 13 F= land uses and plans, f any: z c`Us„ ,� Assisted living is a conditional use under BC zoning and is compatible with the z designation contained in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. All construction will be consistent with the applicable City codes. 0 z X HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, ifany? .indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. :,. 67 middle -income assisted living units will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whetherhigh, middle, or low-income housing. 0 None will be eliminated. . C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing Impacts, `If any: 67 new units will be provided. <, 10. AESMEMS y 4 Y Mat Is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not Including antennas; what Is the principal exterlor building materials) proposed? v r .� z z 11 Height is anticipated not to exceed 25 feet b. W%at views In the immediate vicinity would he altered or obstructed? The view will change to a two-story building over a parking garage. G Proposed torredace or control aesthetic i P mpacts, f any: Landscaping will be used to soften visual impacts with ant emphasis on.appearance from SR 104 (Edmonds Way) frontage as entry to the City. � • ' 1.1 LIGHTAND GLARE a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lighting of parking and grounds will be consistent with multiple family development, vehicle headlights will produce additional light. All such -occurrences will be during non -daylight hours. h. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or Interfere with views? All stationary sources will be shielded from impacts to off -site properties and no such hazard or view interference is anticipated. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare my affect your proposal? Existing lighting on adjoining lands and vehicle headlights on adjacent thoroughfares provide sources of light, but impacts are judged to be minimal. d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, ifany: All building exterior lights will to be shielded and directed toward the interior of the site and will be comparable to that on surrounding developed properties under the same zoning designation. 12 RECREATION a. What designated and Informal recreational opportunities are In the Immediate vicinity? City parks and Puget Sound are located in -the immediate vicinity. L O 10 b. Would tie proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No such uses will be displaced. e Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No such measures are either required or proposed. 13, HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed far, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe:. There are no places or objects listed on, or proposed for local, state or federal preservation registers on or near this site. b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the sue. No landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific, or cultural importance are known to exist on or near the site. a Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed. 14. TRANSPORTATION a Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system Show on site plans, f any. The underground• garage takes access from the north side of Dayton Street and the ` . existing driveway along the north property boundary shared by the adjacent office/residential condominium project. The building also includes a drive -up lane off Second Avenue to the main entrance to the main residential floor of the building for drop off and pick up visitors and residents. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Community Transit has a stops adjacent to the site. 0: 't l is ,t 11 t ii(tpp NJ �a a How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? .a'..w ... .:'J ,.:. ii �':;....i '..:.:i.'.ii..;, \'i.1 : �St1a .;.eJe 1; �:..:i_ ..:'y:i?�JhZQ'".7'.:�'S :, U::.iV••l{. ♦C. A total of 67 parking spaces is proposed. An estimated total of 12 parking spaces will be eliminated. d Will theproposal require any new* roads orstreei4 orimprovements to a dsdng roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None will be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity qf) water, rail, or air ' transportation? If so, generally describt The project does not depend upon, or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would he generated by Ilse completed prof ect? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Extrapolating from data for Elderly Housing - Attached contained in 'ITE Trip .Generation (5th Edition), the 67 units of assisted care are estimated to generate approximately 220 AWDT at a rate of 3.29 AWDT per unit. At a rate of 0.11 trips per unit, 7 p.m. peak hour trips will.be generated. Although the existing 9,500 square foot office building is vacant at this time, past office usage would generate approximately 234 AWDT with 32 p.m. peak hour trips. Accordingly, total traffic to be generated by the completed proposed project will be less than that for potential use of the existing building. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, ifany. In the absence of an increase in traffic impacts, compared with the existing potential use, none are proposed. IS. PUBLICSERVICES a Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example. -fire protection, police protection, health care, scleools, odlier)? If so, generally describe. The project will utilize existing fire protection, police protection, public water and sewer services available to this area. Health services are available from numerous clinics and medical offices in the vicinity. 77 F "I 232701-1.045.0004 ClCCUPANT OR GOLDIES 180 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS. WA 96020 232703-1-0464004 232703-1.045-0004 OCCUPANT OR CAME'RELLI'S OCCUPANT OR THAI PARK 178 SUNSET AVE. 182 SUNSETAVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.1.045.0004 232703.1.04E-0004 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT/RACEWAY HOBBIES 192 SUNSET AVE. 194 SUNSET AVE, EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-COU 232703-1-045.00(4 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OR THE ASSOCIATES 192 SUNSET AVE. 184 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS. WA 98202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1-045-0004 232703-1-045-0004 OCCUPANTlCITY JUICE & JAM OCCUPANT OR ANTHIS 190 SUNSET AVE., SUITE 123 190 SUNSET AVE., SUITE 119 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA $8020 232703.4.080.0004 232703-4-OM0004 EDMONDS LUMBER COMPANY BARKER, FLOYD & JANET & HARDWARE 8159TH AVE. N. 228 STH AVE. S. EDMONDS, .WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 08020 232703-"81-0003 232702-4.0824H=2 PORT OF EDMONDS OCCUPANT 160 W. DAYTON ST. 146 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 96020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-085-0009 232703-4-087-0007 NELSON, MARVIN R.)LESLIE A. OLYMPIC DRIVE ASSOCIATES 209 DAYTON ST., #101 1233 OLYMPIC DRIVE EDONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 9802E 232703-4-089-0005 232703-4-092-0000 NELSON, MARVIN R. /LESLIE A. 10CCUPANT/PINKHAM'S PILLOW 209 DAYTON ST., #101 202 3Rp AVENUE S. EDMONDS, WA 93020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-093-0009 232703.4-095-0007 LORETTA LIND RALPH SORENSEN 222 DAYTON ST. 222 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS, WA 96020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ANi ®R THE LACEMAiCER 176 ,., NSETAVE. EDMONDS. WA 96020 232703-1.045.0004 OCCUPANT OR HOMESTYLE LAUNDRY 164 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232701.1.04S-0004 OCCUPANTMATERFRONT ANTIQUE MAIL 190 SUNSET AVE EDMONDS. WA 98020 232703.14MS4004 OCCUPANT, SUITE 129E 190 SUNSET AVE. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-1.045-M OCCUPANT/ACCENT DESIGN INTERIORS 190 SUNSET AVE., SUITE 111 EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703.4-081-0003 OCCUPANT/HARBOUR SO. BLDG. #3 110 W. DAYTON EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-082.00003 MILLER. ROBIN L. & CAROL 1735E BEACH DR. NE SEATTLE. WA 98155 2327034-087.0007 RESIDENT 223 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 232703-4-092-0000 AGLOW INTERNATIONAL P. 0. BOX 154E LYNNWOOD. WA98046-1548 232703-4-019.0105 4548-003-001-0004 WASH. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 47300 OLYMPIA, WA 08504 4648.002-001-0006 ROSERTY A HENNING 101 JAMES ST. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-002-013.4002 LCM 144 RAILROAD AVE., #204 Z EDMONDS, WA 98020 xuj� u� 4548-001-001.0008 7* 0 S53 E N E WILLIAM & DELORES vi w' EDMONDS. WA 08020 - Lu 4548.001-005 0004 3RD AVE. PLAZA LTD PTNSHP. 20251ST AVE., 01000 SEATTLE, WA 98121 . 2 4548-001.017-0000 L F-' OCCUPANT pi 202 MAIN ST. j2 p EDMONDS, WA 98020 U V! Lu u; 6464-000.001-0005 h HELDE, ERLINE & M.A. ti OI 210 3RD AVE. S., #A EDMONDS, WA 98020 O 64S4-000-004-0002 WILLIAMS. DONALD & PATRICIA 210 3RD AVE. S. #D EDMONDS. WA 98020 6782.000-103-0007 TELFORD, RICHARD & BLISS 200 JAMES ST„ #103 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-106-0004 MCMANUS,STEPHEN P. O. BOX 91000 SAS0701 SEATTLE. WA 08111 .4648-002-001.0008 OCCUPANT/ALASKA NW PURL. 130 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS. WA 98020 4S48.002-013-0002 OCCUPANTIOPTIMUM PRECISION 110 MAIN Sr. EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548.001-001-0008 RESIDENT 221 JAMES ST. EDMONDS, WA 00020 4648-00 -007 3 PTNSHP 20 00 W $121 454MI-020-0004 4548-001 23-0002 HOPPER, HAROLD & CAROLEE 530 BELL ST.. SUITE 1000 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6464-000-002-0004 AUST, DOROTHY G. 210 3RD AVE. S., #B EDMONDS. WA 96020 6782-000.101.0009 JENSEN STERLINE V ET UX 200 JAMES ST., 0101 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6762 000-104-0006 YOUNKIN, MERRILL & DOROTHY 200 JAMES ST., #104 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782,000-107.0003 LOIS C. MASTERES 200 JAMES ST., 0107 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782 000.202.00007 SEABORG. HAROLD & ELLIE 200 JAMES ST.. 9202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4 QNWK2-0MA-=3 NO INVESTMENTS, INC. 120 2ND AVE. S. EDMONDS. WA 00020 4548-002-017-M RIO PETROL. INC. 100 2ND AVE S., #11 EDMONDS, WA 98020 4548-001-003.0006 TINDALL. THOMAS R. 126 3RD AVE. S. EDMONDS. WA 98020 4648-001-017.0000 MAR BEL MARBLE. INC. P. 0. BOX 1449 EDMONDS. WA 98020 4648.001.023-0002 OCCUPANTISEA MOUNTAIN INS. 1312NO AVE. S.. #C EDMONDS. WA 98020 6464-000-003.0003 GARRISON, REV. LIVING TRUST 210 $RD AVE. S., #C EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000.102-0008 HOOD. WILLIAM B., JR. 200 JAMES ST., #102 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6782-00NI05-0005 HASSON. ROBERT & MARCELLA 200 JAMES ST.. #105 EDMONDS. WA 98020 $782-000-108.0002 BALLARD, RONALD & LORETTA 200 JAMES ST., #108 EDMOND$. WA 98020 6782.000 203-00006 PARKS. THOMAS D. 200 JAMES ST. #203 EDMONDS, WA 98020 'rr A, \ I� t t t _i t t 67824W-204-0005782.000-205-0004 EVARTS. ARLENE F. EDALIA, MICHAEL & 67 .'.. 00.206-0003 200 JAMES ST., #204 GENE 200 JAMES ST., 0205 DASON, MARGUERITE G. EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 240 DAMES ST , 208 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8782-000.207.0002 WUSCHERALPH & CLUTE 87882-000.208.0002 KROON. WILLIAM S LUCILLE 6782-000»301-M7 200 DAMEi ST., #207 EDMONDS, WA 98020 200 JAMES ST., #208 HBATUM, ARTHUR & LOUISE 200 DAMES ST.. #301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS. we 96020 6782-000.302-0006 BUNDY. VICTOR & MiLDREO 6782.008403-0005 RAST. WILLIAM C. 6782.000.304.0004 200 JAMES ST., #302 EDMONDS, WA 98020 200 JAMES ST., #303 DAVID PECK 200 DAMES ST„ #304 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-U00.305-0003 ANGUS, JUNE B. 6782-000.306-0002 CADE, BILLY & LENORE 6782-000-307.00001 200 DAMES ST., #305 EDMONDS, WA 98020 200 JAM98 ST., #306 STOKES, DEN LOREE 200 JAMES ST., 0307 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782.000 308.0000 6782-000-308-0000ELW.ROER 6782-000.409-0006 41804 264TH ST. 1604 2 4TH ST, EDMONDS, WA 98020 RESIDENT 200 JAMES ST., #308 FARRELL, EVERETT i. 200 JAMES ST., #401 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-402.0005 BRUNSVOLD, S. K. 6782-NO.403.0004 GREGERSON, BARBARA A. 8782-000.40"008 200 JAMES ST., #402 EDMONDS, WA, 98020 200 JAMES ST.. #403 HA DAMES A, LLI HAMMERSLA, WILLIAM D. 404 EDMONDST. WA 96011 EDMONDS, WA 98020 6782-000-405-0002 WESTON, G. T. 6782-000.4o6-oom GRANT ELWAY, DOROTHY 6782-000.407.0000 200 DAMES sr., ifdOS EDMONDS. WA 98020 200 JAMES ST., #406 CAROL JONNSON TRUST 200 JAMES Sr., #407 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8782-000.408.0009 FARIS, KENNETH & SHIRLEY 7876.000-100.0005 MARINER PLAZA 7876-000-100-0005 200 JAMES ST., #408 EDMONDS, WA 98020 20148 25TH NW SEATTLE, WA 98177 RESIDENT 116 2ND AVE. S., #100 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876-000201-0003 TUCKER, RICHARD & DOROTHY 7876-000 201.0003 RESIDENT 7876.000.202-00002 114 2ND AVE. S., #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 116 2ND AVE. S.. #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 ERWERT, WILLIAM 114 2ND AVEN S„ #202 EDMONDS, WA 98020 7876-000-202.0002 7678.000-203•001 RESIDENT WAGNER. M. JOE 116 2ND AVE. S., #202 114 2ND AVE. S.. #A EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 96090 8139-000-003.0004 OCCUPANT 150 3RD AVE. S.. #C EDMONDS, WA 98020 j8139.000402-0005 BERGMANN, JOHN & SUSAN 152 3RD AVE. S.. #B EDMONDS, WA 98020 81394WO.004-M WIGGINS, JACK & KAREN 1523RDAVE. S., #D EDMONDS, WA 98020 81.4004 TIL N. MICHAEL/CHIYOK0 P.O. BOX 121397 FORT WORTH, TX 76121 81304 0-101-0005,8139.000.102.01M. 811394M201-0004;8139.000.202-0003 RATFLCO PROPERTIES CORP. 1206 MERCER Sr. SEATTLE, WA 98109 813904-101-0005 8139-000-102-0004 8139.000.20i-0004 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT 150 3RD AVE. S.. #101 15D 3RD AVE. S„ #102 150 3RD AVE. S., #201 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMQNDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8139-000-202-0003 8139-000-216-0009 8139a4o218-00009 RESIDENT MEEKS, JOHN N. ETAL RESIDENT 150 3RD AVE. S., #202 15553 HENIIZ AVE, SE 150 3RD AVE. S., 0216 EDMONDS, WA 98020 MONROE, WA 98272 EDMONDS. WA 98020 6641-000-100.0007 SMI-O00-200.0006 8641.000-201-0005 DEWAR MEETKS & EKEM PC STAFFORD CREATIVE, INC. KEN & STEFANIE HALVAS 110 JAMES ST., STE 100 110 JAMES ST., STE 200 110 JAMES ST., STE 201 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641-000-202.0004 8841-000-203-0003 88414XXI-204.0002 FRANCIS KNIGHT CYNTHIA CHAMBERLAIN MEANG & DIANE NOE 110 JAMES ST.. STE 202 110 JAMES ST., STE 203 110 DAMES ST., STE 204 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 86414X*-206.0001 8641-000-300.0005 8841.000.301.0004 HARRY & MARY NYHU jEFF GALBRAITH TERRI SACCO 110 JAMES ST., STE 205 110 JAMES ST.. STE 300 110 JAMES ST.. STE 301 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8641.000-302.0003 6641-OW303-0002 8641-000-304.0001 THOMAS & BETTY MAHAN VIRGINIA REDFIELD RESIDENT 110 JAMES ST., STE 302 110 JAMES ST., STE 303 110 JAMES ST. STE 304 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 EDMONDS, WA 98020 8841-000-100-0007 8641-000-101-0006 8641.000.102-=5 MICHAEL MOSS. CPA SINGULARITY CORPORATION THE 140TEL GROUP 110 JAMES ST., STE 100 110 JAMES ST., STE 101 110 JAMES Sr.. STE 102 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 EDMONDS. WA 98020 8041-000-103-0004 KMJ INTERNATION, INC. 110 JAMES ST.. STE 103 EDMONDS, WA 96020 r,. 0 8641-000-104.0003 MILLERtRUSSEL & ASSOC. 110 JAMES ST.. STE 104 EDMONDS, WA 96020 8841.000.105-0002 AMERICAN EXPRESS FIN. ADV, 110 JAMES ST., STE 105 EDMONDS, WA 98020 S t t i s � t i t tr s ......:._ ., ,_ ..._._...........•._.�...,.........e;.;`:. , .a.;;l.,...nu.ia9�dem:eaasse.0 • .' r ADJACENT PROPERTY 5 LIST, d� Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list. J V gi` UJ On my oatli, I certify that the names and addresses provided 'represent alt properties Cn U. located within 300 feet of the subject property. U. • us o o Signaturrepelican or Applicant's Representative w w aso' Subscribed and sworn to before me this a day of 19 o� c,s r r� a yUJ i"�l�sa��s� u. Z} A r Ni, Notary Public in and for the.State of WashingtQ o z % S Residing at or + ! y� s; -sr 4J: . ft"TT{n,ri APO.dociLATempWorms ^ rr-��r tt}sycR- 1 1T y?Y£�.�z f 1(! 5 .91 s�1Fyl '.�tF'• i +SA >G. �y. 9 f_� $ f `�Yt'XS{y}ny�l:rci'4 tr•-<1Sti �;..t�{ t^p"8'.x '$n` s3 q'S'�.,¢,�