The URL can be used to link to this page

144 RAILROAD AVEA71111lvy RArARoAD AUK IIaI AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC.. ,...,.�.. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH j43-3Q3 SEATTLE, WA 98109 fuFOBfbAAin�:.fIF1E COIA EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER - DRY SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED I YELLOW JXJ I WHITE _ _ CONFIDENCE TEST REPAIRS F Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person First & Last Name: f OHN HATTON Phone Number: (206) 255-4175 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: 7--2Q16 Inspection Quarterly Li Frequency/Type Annual a Testers Name Nicet Certification (Please Print): Seth Sample Number: 8260-0609-E Identification Number (Required): S-08260 System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes ✓❑ No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNEL System Model: E-2 FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IN OUE I WATER MOTOR GONG INOR ICORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (if additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: �� Phone # 1206) 284-1721 Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes © No ❑ 2. System tripped in 40 seconds. Trip point 20 Time to inspectors test 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes ❑X No ❑ 4. Static pressure: 135 psi Flow pressure: 115 psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 70 6. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 8. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes ❑X No ❑ 10. Heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? N/A X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 12. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes 0 No ❑ 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes 0 No ❑ 14. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes 0 No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes 0 No ❑ Date of last test: 16. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 0 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for Yes 0 No ❑ each? 18. System left in service? Yes 0 No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes 0 No ❑ Year changed: 07/13 20. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical damage? Yes 0 No ❑ 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes 0 No ❑ 22. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No 0 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date of last back flush 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No 0 (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Yes ❑ No 0 Performed Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 AAA AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC. .,...,...,,.N< . 3013 3RD AVE NORTH (80012-23-3473 SEAME, WA 98109 jL1Q0AAAFRE C01A EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRU5TED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER - WET SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW IX WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST JFXJI REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person JOHN HATTON First & Last Name: Phone Number: (425) 359-5035 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: 7-7-2016 Inspection Frequency/Type: Annual Q Quarterly Testers Name Seth Sample Nicet Certification (Please Print): Number: 8zgQ0609-E Identification S-08260 Number: System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes 0 No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes 0 No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNELL System Model: 6 " FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE WATER MOTOR GONG INOP CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building OwneFlManager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Wet Page i of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes 0 No ❑ 2. Static pressure: 135 p.s.i. Flow pressure: 115 p.s.i. 3. Number of Sprinkler Heads: 100 4. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ 5. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes ❑X Non 6. Pressure regulating valves tested? N/A © Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No X❑ 8. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 9. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes X❑ No ❑ 10. Signs are provided on valves? Yes X❑ No ❑ 11. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes 0 No ❑ 12. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 0 13. Have the sprinkler heads been replaced or successfully sample test in the Yes 0 No ❑ last 50 years? Date of last test: 14. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrenches Yes 0 No ❑ for each? 15. System left in service? Yes 0 No ❑ 16. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes X❑ No ❑ Year changed: 7/2013 17. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical Yes 0 No ❑ damage? 18. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? 19. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed within the last 5 years? Date of last back flush 20. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Performed 21. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No 0 Yes ❑ No X❑ N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Sprinklers - Wet Page 2 of 2 Serving Brier Edmonds, and _•7Glountlake Terrace www.FireDistrictl.org - FIRE PREVENTION I INSPECTION REPORT 12425 Meridian Ave � ❑ EDMONDs Everett, WAS 98208 ❑BRIER Phone (425)' 551-1200z: ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 4 ❑ UNINCORPORATED Fax (425) 551-1272. }' FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 144 Railroad Avenue Bldg 98020 BUSINESS NAME: PHONE: SCHEDULED DATE DUE Waterfront Park Bldg 4257712813 MAILING [FIR / ADDRESS: 509 144 Railroad Avenue, Bldg, Edmonds, WA 98020 "BUSINESS OWNER: HOME PHONE: Tesser Group LLC EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: Hatton, John HOME PHONE: 2062554175 CITY YES NO EMAIL: BUSINESS ❑ LICENSE �j tt PERSON CONTACTED: (y 0 pH _ S (dii�l�p we- 12. (,�- .� L'^ y� • h^ �oK INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 4v "'Arw o � w . O7 J (g A 4Ge W%s 1p -13-l�, -71I( - -1 IL Inv — FIRE SYSTEMS: ASJN'5 AAi-r5 E SA -Er D Lk Box IDataFI ii W mcbcATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 1 �e,�a�-✓ e,w.,..d-�,e,,,�l_ e.-,c c�- I:gG+�N� �.►�-�,�.¢ �fec��.cu�l _ 12ocw.. 2� 1 , 2 2 3_ ._.. — _.. 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I I AGREE TO.CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1 st RE -INSPECTION 2nd RE -INSPECTION FINAL RE EXTENSION -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE' CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: - ®, .a_® PERSON CONTACTED: _ - _._.._.,._.. _.... _., t INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: $ INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: VIOLATIONS 1. 15 DATE: VIOLATIONS' Is _ _ DATE:___ -- _ CITATION ISSUED PRE -CITATION I 3 4 1 LETTER SENT NUMBER, 2 6 . __..._._.... __._ _. 2 6DATE: _ ._.._,.._._.. __—_.__ CODE t SECTION: ...__.._.__.._...—._.. .. .... _.____......._.__ 5 . ._....__ _.... .. RETURN RECEIPT 3 '7 3 ,7 _ RECEIVED s .... _.._.....w_._..E . __.............._...® DISPOSITION:... ...._ ___._..Y._-..-......__ ..._....,..—., _ ... 18 9� 4 DATE: __._...... _... ...... _. i LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO .... __._. _ _...t8.._ V...,e®_ _ LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 ittPall AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH IgFQ®aa -3 C3 SEATTLE, WA 98109 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER — DRY SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED I YELLOW JXJ I WHITE _ CONFIDENCE �TESTX I REPAIRS I E Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person First & Last Name: IOHN HATTON Phone Number: (206) 255-4175 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip. E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: 7-7-2016 Inspection Quarterly U Frequency/Type Annual ❑X Testers Name Nicet Certification (Please Print): Seth Sample Number. 8260-0609-E Identification Number (Required): 5-08260 System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNEL System Model: E-2 FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE WATER MOTOR GONG INOP. CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: �� Phone # (206) 284-1721 Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 11 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes 0 No ❑ 2. System tripped in 40 seconds. Trip point 20 Time to inspectors test 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes ❑X No ❑ 4. Static pressure: 135 psi Flow pressure: 115 Psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 70 6. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 8. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes 0 No ❑ 10. Heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? N/A 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 12. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes 0 No ❑ 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes 0 No ❑ 14. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes 0 No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes 0 No ❑ Date of last test: 16. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 0 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for Yes 0 No ❑ each? 18. System left in service? Yes 0 No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes 0 No ❑ Year changed: 07/13 20. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical damage? Yes 0 No ❑ 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes 0 No ❑ 22. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No 0 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date of last back flush 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No 0 (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Yes ❑ No 0 Performed Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 lit AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC. - .A.,A ry .. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH (M) 223.s473 SEA ME, WA 98109 W00AAAFRE coM EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER - WET SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST X REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person JOHN HATTON First & Last Name: Phone Number: (425) 359-5035 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E—Mail Address Date of Inspection: 7-7-2016 Inspection Frequency[Type: Annual 0 Quarterly Testers Name Seth Sample Nicet Certification (Please Print): p Number: 8260-0609-E Identification S-08260 Number: System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes El No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes ) No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNELL System Model: 6„ FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE WATER MOTOR GONG INOP CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Wet Page 1 of 2 e The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all. of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes � No El 2. Static pressure: 135 p.s.i. Flow pressure: 115 p.s.i. 3. Number of Sprinkler Heads: 100 4. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ 5. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No❑ 6. Pressure regulating valves tested? N/A © Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 8. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 9. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes No ❑ 10. Signs are provided on valves? Yes No ❑ 11. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes 0 No ❑ 12. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No FX-1 13. Have the sprinkler heads been replaced or successfully sample test in the Yes X❑ No ❑ last 50 years? Date of last test: 14. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrenches Yes 0 No ❑ for each? 15. System left in service? Yes ❑X No ❑ 16. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes 0 No ❑ Year changed: 7/2013 17. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical Yes 0 No ❑ damage? 18. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No X❑ 19. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed within the last 5 Yes ❑ No 0 years? Date of last back flush 20. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date Performed 21. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No X❑ (Ref: NP,PA 25 5.2.7) 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ company? Sprinklers - Wet Page 2 of 2 �' GUARDIANSECURITY�!�,�� Fire Department >11ank CCNFIDENCETESTING U44 FAa�A o „_ .� y7: U.'Z-S" ", Sic IGW rie.;r c;.i _Lest , FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (CTF-8) - ,Fx 7.:0 Clxb IZX l:r,,c5 Date of Inspection Lie. GUAF;DSl-SzK� .K.K5 / ` Fnclli zz ' F ✓F� f •-.:i v ; Gr ✓ A.ddresa'Gzm0 Buildinuwnar �i' /[.s�7 ice!' 1Z� 1_ ._., Phones g ._.... MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL CHECKS Y(Yv ival _... _ Sern Annual ❑ out tad ,. [ 91 Men'hly LJ Monthly 1. Control Panel hRanufacturer.._.__ 1. _ f_..!✓J .....__ Model 2. No. of Initiating Circuits No. of Signaling C!lculls 3. Static Battery Voltages: if1 Z , k2 t13 rt , , 4. Battery Vcltages Under Load w,'& nal Devices Operating: 41 2- � 4203 #a . Charge Circuit Voltage: '��. a .._ ._ Battery Test Duration: mins. G. Trouble Signal tv!AC Power Off: L-q; ❑ No I N/A Explain: 7. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On Standby (Eattery) Power: 11 No ❑ N,A Expram:._ a. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On AC Power: w�''as ❑ No CI NIA Explain: . _ ... ..._ .._..._.. _..-......_ _.. _........ ., .. ....._ .... _... 9. All Circuits Checked For=lecthcal Supervision: -4as ❑ No C N/A Explain: 10. Control Panel Checks Made Per fvtanufacturars tnstructions: Yea O No G N/A Explain: 11. All .Auxiliary Equipment Oparates (Elevators, HVAC Fan shut down, Door closures Vanf dampers, Etc), O Yes 0 tic I*A Explain: 12 Does Alarm System b1eet Audibility Standards' *Yes C I No 1-1 N/A Explain: 18 Mnnitrning Station Alarm CirrAjit;sr j - 1es . 1 No ID N/A Explain: 14. Alarm Delay Function (if installed; Operates Property: D Yes ONO A/A Explelni 15. Panel Key Available: r r(es ONO 13 WA Explain: 16- Op?rating InstructlonS at Panel' 14,45 L1 No CI wA Explain.- 17. TestrService Record at Fire Alarm Control Panel: A" lJ No If nc, altars fled? EQUIPMENT TYPE No_ OF UNITS RESULTS NO. (Ir- UNITS IFS I'E�j, INBU,LDiNd:. Audlo (Bells, Horns, Chimes, Voice.Alann Speakers) Yes No I " Visual Alarm Devices AudioAJisual Devices :5 71 Yes t No Smoke Detectors f 7/' Yan _ Yes ._ No No Heat Detectors —Y vas No Manual Pull Stations ` Yes _..__ No 7 Trouble Irdicaturs % Yes .,A!- No % Annunciators Yes .._..,__._ No Auto Door Unk)rks (Fail Safa Opeiatinn) Ycs ...._..._ No Auto Door Release Yes _._--__ Nu Fire/Smoke Dampers ;Ventilation Controls) Yes Duct Detectors Yes No _ Flremans Phones -- ... _ Yes _ No Public_ Address System Yes _._—. No -- Elevator Capture Phase 91 ___ . _.... Yes — No Phesc #Z _ Yes Nn _ Generator Starts Yes _ No Automatic Sprinkler Flow Switches Yea Automatic Sprinkler Supervisory S'eilches Yes No Automatic Sprinkler Valve Tamper S41ches Yes __ -_-. No i. Contrcl va,ve Supervisory Switches ........ _ Yes vn Exlerior 'Water Molur-BelliGong _.___-__._ Yes — No Fire Department Monitoring __.... _...... Ycs -----_ No itoniloriry Station -Signal received -i . ,j —._ Yes . ti. No Name of Aia,m Mnnilnring Company Other Yra .-_--.-- No .. This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover Pe items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm rpyptenance Itandards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the g owrwWartager rur currecfive Action. Sq aft. ra nr Fa: ity rivr priit?areger - - Slgnati n<peclorrlachnidan Technician Electrical Ocense #, Technician Certification # Problem; Foitnrl' _I_��r �= Correction Made:...__. — Late Corrected Rev. 0611 V02 Proorictary and Confidential AAA AAA FIRE& SAFETY, INC. EDMONDS .,...,...,.,.�.. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH FIRE DEPARTMENT �8D0j22'-"" SEATTLE, WA 98109 I ` "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" 6 ptj SPRINKLER - DRY SYSTEM �,e- (One S 17S �oq3 stem per Report) RED y YEI CONFIDENCE TEST IN I REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: �'"��" _ Responsible Person Al-71 First & Last Name: IOHN HATTON Phone Number: r _ Responsible Person Responsible Party ` 'LD 13 Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: Inspection Quarterly 07/14/15 Frequencyrrype Annual FX Testers Name Nicet Certification (Please Print): Seth Sample Number: 8260-0609-E Identification Number (Required): S-08260 System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes V3 No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes m No Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNEL System Model: E-2 FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IN DUE NO SPRINKLER COVERAGE IN RISER ROOM WATER MOTOR GONG INOP. CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # (206) 284-1721 Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 i The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting " and testing requirements. General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes ® No ❑ 2. System tripped in 45 seconds. Trip point 25 Time to inspectors test 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes X❑ No ❑ 4. Static pressure: 13�psi Flow pressure: 115 psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 70 6. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes ® No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes © No ❑ B. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes ® No ❑ 10. Heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? N/A ® Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes © No ❑ 12. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes ® No ❑ 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes ® No ❑ 14. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes ❑X No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes ® No ❑ Date of last test: 16. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for Yes ® No ❑ each? 18. System left in service? Yes ® No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes 0 No El changed: 07/13 20. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical damage? Yes © No ❑ 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes © No ❑ 22. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No Date of last back flush 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Yes ❑ No Performed Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 tit AAA AAAFIRE & SAFETY, INC. .,...,..... �.. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH (800)223-3073 SEATnE, WA 98109 NFO@AAAFRE.COM CT1•0r FIRE DEPARTMENT 'THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION' SPRINKLER - WET SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED YELLOW X I WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST X REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person JOHN HATTON First & Last Name: Phone Number: (425) 359-5035 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: 07/14/2015 01:00pm PDT Inspection Frequency/Type: Annual Quarterly Testers Name Seth Sam ample, Nicet Certification (Please Print): p Number: 8260-0609-E Identification S-08260 Number: System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes El No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes El No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNELL System Model: 6" FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE NO SPRINKLER COVERAGE IN RISER ROOM WATER MOTOR GONG INOP CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (if additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: S L5 Phone # Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Wet Page 1 of 2 i The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes ® No ❑ 2. Static pressure: 130 p.s.i. Flow pressure: 115 p.s.i. 3. Number of Sprinkler Heads: 100 4. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ 5. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No❑ 6. Pressure regulating valves tested? N/A ® Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 9. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes © No ❑ 10. Signs are provided on valves? Yes ® No ❑ 11. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes ® No ❑ 12. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 59 13. Have the sprinkler heads been replaced or successfully sample test in the Yes ® No ❑ last 50 years? Date of last test: 14. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrenches Yes © No ❑ for each? 15. System left in service? Yes ® No ❑ 16. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes ® No ❑ Year changed: 7/2013 17. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical Yes ® No ❑ damage? 18. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No 19. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed within the last 5 Yes ❑ No years? Date of last back flush 20. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date Performed 21. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring N/A ❑ Yes ® No ❑ company? Sprinklers - Wet Page 2 of 2 -tit., AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC. • ,A, A�A. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH EDMONDS (800)223.3473 SEATTLE, WA 98109 FIRE DEPARTMENT/ INFO@AAAME.COM "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER - DRY SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED r YELLOW X I WHITE CONFIDENCE TiSfl X I REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person First & Last Name: JOHN HATTON Phone Number: (206) 255-4175 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: Inspection Quarterly 07/14/15 Frequency/Type 0 Annual Testers Name Nicet Certification (Please Print): Seth Sample Number: 8260-0609-E Identification Number (Required): S-08260 System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes ❑✓ No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes ❑ No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNEL System Model: E-2 FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE NO SPRINKLER COVERAGE IN RISER ROOM WATER MOTOR GONG INOP. CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: Phone # (206) 284-1721 Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Dry Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting ` and testing requirements. ` General 1. Trip test conducted? Yes ❑X No ❑ 2. System tripped in 45 seconds. Trip point 25 Time to inspectors test 3. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes 0 No ❑ 4. Static pressure: 130 psi Flow pressure: 115 psi 5. Number of Sprinkler Heads? 70 6. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 7. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 8. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X 9. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes or less? Yes ❑X No ❑ 10. Heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? N/A 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. System inspected and lubricated? Yes No ❑ 12. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes ❑X No ❑ 13. Signs are provided on valves? Yes 0 No ❑ 14. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes Z No ❑ 15. Sprinkler heads replaced or successfully sample tested in last 10 years? Yes Z No ❑ Date of last test: 16. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 0 17. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrench for Yes 0 No ❑ each? 18. System left in service? Yes 0 No ❑ 19. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes ❑X No ❑ Year changed: 07/13 20. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical damage? Yes 0 No ❑ 21. System drained and restored to normal operation? Yes M No ❑ 22. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No ❑X 23. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed in the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date of last back flush 24. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring company? N/A ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ 25. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No X❑ (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 26. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Date Yes ❑ No Performed Sprinklers - Dry Page 2 of 2 (800)223-3473 0dF094AAAFlRE.COM AAA FIRE & SAFETY, INC. 3013 3RD AVE NORTH SEATTLE, WA 98109 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT "THE NORTHWESTS MOST TRUSTED NAME IN FIRE PROTECTION" SPRINKLER - WET SYSTEM Status Given (One System per Report) RED I YELLOW X I WHITE CONFIDENCE TEST X I REPAIRS Occupancy Address: 144 RAILROAD AVE Occupancy Name: WATERFRONT PARK Responsible Person JOHN HATTON First & Last Name: Phone Number: (425) 359-5035 Responsible Person Responsible Party Address, City, State, Zip: E-Mail Address Date of Inspection: 07/14/2015 01:00pm PDT Inspection Frequency/Type: Annual ❑X Quarterly Testers Name Seth Sample Nicet Certification (Please Print): p Number: 8260-0609-E Identification S-08260 Number: System Location: PARKING Central station monitoring? Yes El No ❑ Monitoring Monitoring Required? Yes El No ❑ Company Name: GAURDIAN System Make: GRINNELL System Model: 6" FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS FOUND: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) 5YR IPI DUE NO SPRINKLER COVERAGE IN RISER ROOM WATER MOTOR GONG INOP CORRECTIONS MADE: Date Corrected: Corrected By: (If additional room is needed, please add a separate sheet) Nicet Certification Number: - This certifies that this fire and life safety system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the Items listed in this report and is consistent with Fire Code standards, and that discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the building Owner/Manager for corrective action. Signature of Tester: �� Phone # Building Representative (signature) Sprinklers - Wet Page 1 of 2 The items on the checklists below shall be inspected and tested. This list does not constitute all of the required inspecting and testing of the fire and life safety system. Refer to the Fire Code for inspecting and testing requirements. General 1. Main Drain and Inspector's Drain flow test conducted? Yes X❑ No ❑ 2. Static pressure: 130 p.s.i. Flow pressure: 115 p.s.i. 3. Number of Sprinkler Heads: 100 4. 2-inch drain? Other ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ 5. Flow switches, supervisory switches and alarm bells tested? N/A ❑ Yes 0 No❑ 6. Pressure regulating valves tested? N/A ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ 7. Alarm bell operates? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 8. System inspected and lubricated? Yes 0 No ❑ 9. Valves are sealed or supervised? Yes ❑X No ❑ 10. Signs are provided on valves? Yes 0 No ❑ 11. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed and turn freely? Yes X❑ No ❑ 12. Sprinkler coverage is acceptable? Yes ❑ No 0 13. Have the sprinkler heads been replaced or successfully sample test in the Yes 0 No ❑ last 50 years? Date of last test: 14. Proper number of spare sprinkler heads available with appropriate wrenches Yes 0 No ❑ for each? 15. System left in service? Yes ❑X No ❑ 16. System gauges replaced or calibrated within the last 5 years? Yes 0 No El Year changed: 7/2013 17. Sprinkler heads free of corrosion, paint, obstructions and/or physical Yes 0 No ❑ damage? 18. Was debris found in the Fire Department Connection (FDC)? Yes ❑ No ❑X 19. Was the Fire Department Connection (FDC) back flushed within the last 5 Yes ❑ No ❑X years? Date of last back flush 20. Was an internal pipe and valve inspection performed within the last 5 years? Yes ❑ No 0 Date Performed 21. Is the hydraulic nameplate installed and visible on riser. Yes ❑ No ❑X (Ref: NFPA 25 5.2.7) 22. Was a signal received at the Central Station monitoring N/A ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ company? Sprinklers - Wet Page 2 of 2 0 --- , UARDIAM S ECURIrY Sean ❑ Silverdale 0 eeuingham 1743 First Avenue South 9435 Provost Rd 0204 rS01 Kentucky Street Seam., WA 96134 Silverdale, WA 98383 Bellingham, WA 98229 1-800.282.6998 360-3913738 360a47-0110 . Lie. # GUARDSS233K5 1-300-366.1005 Facility Addees: Buildini r,oId �� :5 Fire Department CONFIDENCE. TESTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM (CTF-8) Date of Inspection r"--� " 20 1 MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL CHECKS XAnnuai ❑ Semi Annual -0 Quarterly ❑ z :,••-� ,. '�' �Cstd odel i. Controi:;Panet;Mariufacturei ,: _ 2 No of InitialingCircuits No of Signaling Stahr<B`tery Voltages .�itt .�#2— #3 #4 r 1 i,: ,: i c 4 Battery Voltages Under Load wiSwq 0 erating f #12 #a #4 5 Chaige,Clrcu t YolFage �'' .. :; Batfery;Test Duration r._..�i_ c......i ...)At' o.. —, na- 'Yes ❑ No ❑ MA Explain: B AEI Circuits Operate Satisfactory On AC Power es ❑ No ❑ NiA Explain .. e i~rrcfnts Checf<ed ;=ar Elec7lcal Sr penrtslon x t ' , Yee D No �NrA �ptain 10 Control Panel Checks Made Per Manufacturers Instructions: Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Explain s. 11 All Auxiliary Equipment Operates „< ...,r.,,;,,. . ,. _ :•c•• •- tElevatas,:HVAC> atYshufdowrr Doorclosiires; Vent:dampers.£Ec.l :`.._.. .::_❑yes;t, i:�Nb;r NrA, . , xplain:* 12 D.oesAlarmSYS;emlVleet'Rudibihty.Standartis •';: _>. Yes-, ;�No .[]PbA 9 � Explain 7. 13 Monitoring Station Alarm Circult(s): Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA Explain -T_ ]•armDelay'Fuhction,(efjnstalied)Qperatas.Arope!l 4Aly �Yas 0 Eiliplaint, 15 Panel hey Availablel"es ❑ No ❑ NIA Explain tb Operating ►n$truc)ipns aCPanel q� `es ❑ No G WA ' Explain 17 Test/Service Record at Fire Alarm Control Panel ij��Y e [I No If no where filed? Vs •1 N OF UNITS EQUIPMENT TYPE No of UNITS RESULTS o- e Yes No Audio (Bells Horns, Chimes Voice Alarm Speakers) Tr • - _ -arY s No Si Visual A!rlY bevices _;.,- � i Audio/Visual Devices 1 Yes No n� Heat Detectors Antantial Puii StatlOtis ` Troubte Indicators .1 AnnUncrarors Y os No P ..... ,.•. Na r i� Auto Door Unlocks (Fail Safe Operation) Yes No Au(o Door Release S Yes No FireiSmoke Dampers (Ventilation Controls) vas No Firemans Phones Pub(• dress System, Yes �No _ r J. :.,.. .: :Yes •; - No. ,• _, .; ; — , ._. Elevator Capture Phase #1 es No Yes No a Phase $2, _ Generator Starts Yes No Autdmafic SprinWl r.flor, Switches ?= .••tree No — Automatic Sprinkler Supervisory Switches Yes No { 7.Automsiic SpE.1'i Valya Tamper S:vitck z - - r ;Yes �— :`_ - No '- Control Valve Supervisory Switches Yes No — Exterror.Water Molor BeIIIGd ig .. e. 7. _' yes --..; -: No Fire Department Mondoring Monitoring Station Signal received ; Yes —r o N Y o . S —r- Name of Alarm Monitoring CompanyYe iy _� - - , Other ' s No -- - -- This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported t the building OWnerlManager for corrective Action. Si nature of fnspe rJTe hnicrar, 9 _ P Signature of., facility Owner/Manag /, A�d- 1A,��_ Technician Electrical License # Technician Certification if Problems Found: Correction Made: Date Corrected By: Rev. 06l11;02 I Serving Brier; 'Edmonds, and Mountlake Terrace 1:7 Z "A%.# A' www.FireDistrictl.org LOCATION: 144 Railroad Avenue -Bldg 98020 BUSINESS NAME: Waterfront Park Bldg MAILING 144 Railroad Avenue, Bldg, Edmonds, WA 98020 ADDRESS: Tesser Group LLC BUSINESS OWNER: EMERGENCY-1: Hatton, John KEY ACCESS-2: ''11 * EMAIL: 1 PERSON CONTACTED: k NAME OF INSPECTOR: �., _La'(1.L A, �2 r�)qr (, 12425 Meridian Ave S Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 551-1200 Fax (425) 551-1272 PHONE: 4257712813 HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: 2062554175 HOME PHONE: FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT ❑ EDMONDS ❑ BRIER ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY I STATION & SHIFT Annual 17-B SCHEDULED.lun 2015 DATE DUE 509 UFIR / CURRENT CITY DES NR BUSINESS ��`jl �LJU j LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE S� o" t d HAZARDS FOUND AND 1 t� C TIONSrMU,jCAT ONS r 2 a 2 3 / 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 1 r I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: �- EXTENSION GRANTEDTO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON " CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 }{ i 4 8 4 8 DATE: DISPOSITION: 7 LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY H N 3013 3rd AVE NORTH ESEATTLE, WA 98109 (206)284-1721 A A R (206) 284-1769 FAX FIRE `SAFETY W_ - AAA1I0.CpM Address Occupied as: Building Owner: Address: Date of Inspection: Tester's Name (PLEASE PRI] FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOICE # Confidence Testing ACCOUNT # 1 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYTEM DATE City: "/ Zip Code d City: Zip Code: tut' I a.V iIT TypeM io An ual Other f /' � /, M SFD Certification # I �T''W ` Z DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: System tripped in —e-- seconds 2. All flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells tested 3. Alarm Bell operates: 4. Flow tests conduct d: Static Pressure _� psi Flow pressure psi 2 inch drain? 5. Systems inspected and lubricated 6. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes 7. Systems drained and restores to normal operations 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? WET SYSTEM I. Flow test conducted: c Static Pressure J psi Flow Pressure psi 2 inch drain? 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells, tested 3. Alarm bell operates: 4. Systems inspected and lubricated: 5. Pressure regulating valves tested: GENERAL 1. Central Station Monitoring? Name of Company 2. Location of Sprinkler: Basement Hallways As Designed Others 3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed 4. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available 6. Systems left in service 7. Valves are sealed or supervised 8. Signs are provided on valves �� _ r 9. City Static Water Pressure —�='� psi i PROBLEMS FOUND: CORRECTIONS MADE: Date corrected By Yes ZN o Yes No Yes 1,/�No Yes / No Yes o Yes y/ o Yes o Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes ✓o Yes No Yes o Yes No Yes L"�No Yes L-�No Yes Yes Yes o Yes No Yes -�No N/A N/A N/A '✓ Other N/A _ N/A _ N/A _ N/A _ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SPRINKLPKSYSTE S BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS REPORT: SIGNATURE OF TESTER SFD LICENSE # WZ Form #: 8304 GUARDIAN SECURITY r1SeaKk ❑ Silverdale ❑ Bellingham 1743 First Avenue South 9435 Provost Rd 0204 1501 Kentucky Street Seattle.WA 96134 Silverdale, WA 96363 Bellingham, WA 962. 1.600-282.6998 360-392.3738 360.647-0110 Lic # GUARDSS233K5 1-e00a66-1005 Facility d �s, vsarx S Fire Department CONFIDENCE TESTING FIRE ALARIIQ SYSTEM (CTF-8) Date of Inspection 7/'z2/ IN Address /y7Q�1�—,G>r�t' r.,r.•�veic .s i �+ •� ► •� /f Building Owner C�wlt R'7K_� its r' MAIN FIRE CONTROL PANEL COECKS a Annual ❑ semi -Annual 1. Control Panel Manufacturer l Model _ 2. No. of Initiating Circuits No, of Signaling 3. Static Battery Voltages: #1 #2 #3 04 #4 4. Battery Voltages Under Load w/Signal Devices Operating: #1Z^ � #2 #3 5. Charge Circuit Voltage: IZ7 r1a Battery Test Duration: mans. 6. Trouble Signal w/AC Power Ott: i,/es •❑ No ❑ N/A Explali 7. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On Standby (Battery) Power: IG Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA ExplaU 8. All Circuits Operate Satisfactory On AC Power: Yes l ❑ No ❑ NIA Explafi 9. Ali Circuits Checked For Electrical Supervision: ��s ❑ No ❑ NIA Explal 10. Control Panel Checks Made Per Manufacturers Instructions: (dyes ❑ No ❑ NIA Expial 11. All Auxiliary Equipment Operates (Elevators, HVAC Fan shut down, Door closures, Vent dampers, Etc.): ❑ Yes ❑ No [;KA 12. Does Alarm System Meet Audibility Standards: P'Yes ❑ No 13. Monitoring Station Alarm Circuit(s): O'Yes n No 14. Alarm Delay Function (if installed) Operates Properly: ❑ Yes ❑ No 15. Panel Key Available: ;Aes C7 No 16. Operating Instructions at Panel: P Yes ❑ No 17.7esUService Record at Fire Alarm Control Panels C No EQUIPMENT TYPE Audio (Bells, Horns, Chimes, Voice Alarm Speakers) Visual Alarm Devices Audio/Visual Devices Smoke Detectors Heat Detectors Manual Pull Stations Trouble Indicators Annunciators Auto Door Unlocks (Fail Safe Operation) Auto Door Release Fire/Smoke Dampers (Ventilation Controls) Duct Detectors Firemans Phones Public Address System Elevator Capture Phase #1 Phase #2 Generator Starts Automatic Sprinkler Flow Switches Automatic Sprinkler Supervisory Switches Automatic Sprinkler Valve Tamper Switches Control Valve Supervisory Switches Exterior Water Motor-BeWGong Fire Department Monitoring Monitoring Station -Signal received Name of Alarm Monitoring Company Other ❑ NIA ❑ NIA R4A ❑ NIA C NIA Explain: Explain: If no, where filed? Phone# NO. OF UNITS RESULTS NO. OF UNITS TESTED JN BUILDING T Yes � No .— y — Yes No _— Yes � No Yes --' No L Yes _ G No Yes / No / Yes No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes --_ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No Yes _ No �— Yes No Yes _ No This Certifies that this fire alarm system has been properly inspected for reliability to cover the items listed in this report, is consistent with fire alarm maintenance standards, discrepancies are noted and have been reported to the bu' i g wner/Ma ia,&r for corrective Action. Signature of: Facility Owner/Manager Signature of. s echnician "I ky,'h of 2Cliy Technician Electrical License # Problems Found: Correction Made: Date Corrected L'-3Z4 Technician Certification If By: Proprietary and Confidential Rev. 06/11 /02 3/27/2014 12:54 pm System Event Report Page 1 of 1 Sorted by Installer# Installer# First to Last CS# 75775447 to 75775447 Site Type All Employee# All Corporate Acct. All System Type All Date CS# Op Zone Event Location/Comment Disposition Installer 75128 Guardian Security Site Name Waterfront Park Association Site Add ress_144-Railroad Ave :S 1 301-Edmonds-WA-98020 3/27/2014 09:41:06 75775447 LJO 1999 PASSCARD -- - --- Guardian Security 3/27/2014 09:41:06 75775447 LJO ONTEST PLACED ON TE 'Test Cat: 8 Expires: 03/27/2014 11:00:00 All Zones 3/27/2014 09:42:39 75775447 2 2321 :Trouble :SEW 'Test 3/27/2014 09:45:14 75775447 801 2263 :Low Battery:W 'Test 3/27/2014 09:45:14 75775447 2 2321 :Trouble :SEW 'Test 3/27/2014 09:48:12 75775447 2 2321 :Trouble :SEW 'Test 3/27/2014 09:50:07 75775447 1 2371 A:FIRE :FE 'Test General 3/27/2014 09:50:39 75775447 1 CIR140 :Restore of Condit 'Test General 3/27/2014 09:50:51 75775447 2 CIR370 :Restore of Condit 'Test 3/27/2014 09:52:36 75775447 NJB 1999 PASSCARD Guardian Security 3/27/2014 09:52:38 75775447 NJB CLTEST CLEAR TEST 'Test Cat: 8 3/27/2014 10:51:40 75775447 SCB 1999 PASSCARD Guardian Security 3/27/2014 10:51:40 75775447 SCB ONTEST PLACED ON TE 'Test Cat: 8 Expires: 03/27/2014 13:00:00 All Zones 3/27/2014 10:52:42 75775447 2 2321 :Trouble :SEW 'Test 3/27/2014 11:07:48 75775447 1 2371 A:FIRE :FE 'Test General 3/27/2014 11:07:54 75775447 1 2371 AFIRE :FE 'Test General 3/27/2014 11:08:01 75775447 1 CIR140 :Restore of Condi• 'Test General 3/27/2014 11:10:01 75775447 2 CIR370 :Restore of Con& 'Test 3/27/2014 11:17:42 75775447 LJO 1999 PASSCARD Guardian Security 3/27/2014 11:17:43 75775447 LJO CLTEST CLEAR TEST 'Test Cat: 8 Dates 3/27/2014 to 3/27/2014 Reporting Group All Scheduled User/Phone Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Conrad Berube (Seattle Branch) Installer 75128 Guardian Security Page 11 of 1 HSTRfAm Serving Brier, Edmonds, 12425 Meridian Ave S OHOMI, CO. 11]ft� Mountlake Terrace,'and Everett, WA 98208 the Town of Woodway Phone (425) 551-1200 iT wwwFireDistrict].org Fax (425) 551-1272 FREQUENCY STATION& SHIFT LOCATION: JAA Rallroad'Avenue to - 731 17, D L, SCHEDULED BUSINESS NAME: Vacan4 P ONE: 4257719349 DATE DUE ► 06/01/ 13 ? MAILING 144 Railroad Ave #102 UFIR ► 591 6202 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 BUSINESS OWNER: Sage, Doug HOME PHONE: 4257756093 ACTIVE ' r. , EMERGENCY-1: Waterfront Park Assoc, HOME PHONE: 4257712813 CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS LICENSE INITIAL INSPECTION DATE PERSON CONTACTED: NAME OF INSPECTOR: FIRE r fl-S �-IL_ O' V FE j /j SYSTEM °:�, -1� ImI Z ° � m . ANNUAL FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTION REPORT ❑ EDMONDS ❑ BRIER ❑ WOODWAY ❑ MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ❑ UNINCORPORATED HAZARDS FOUND AND10CATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS \\ i !f. V 2 011fcl tr cc_ ss o 67 1 e c Lr J cc. u,/ 2 1+ A in v Z 7 3 or- VN C — IJ,C� 3 R A p C:) G . r w c. � � 7Y- YJ v VIZ \'T L �,. J 2 Eft L 4 Gt f -� — O U S� Q , 4 .k 5 5 6 / 6 7 / 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION y 2nd RE -INSPECTION EXTENSION FINAL RE -INSPECTION VIOLATIONS DATE'DUE: DATE DUE: GRANTED TO: DATE DUE: CITED: PERSON PERSON PERSON CONTACTED: CONTACTED: CONTACTED: I INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS VIOLATIONS PRE -CITATION CITATION ISSUED 4 1 5 1 5 LETTER SENT NUMBER: 2 6 2 6 i DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 RETURN'RECEIPT 6 3 7 3 7 RECEIVED DISPOSITION: 7 4 8 4 8 DATE:1 LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO }` 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY Kevin Zweber From: johnrhatton12@gmail.com on behalf of John Hatton [John@tesseragroupllc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 12:43 PM To: Kevin Zweber Subject: Re: 144 Railroad Ave We'll get these items taken care of. Thanks for the heads up. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Kevin Zweber <kZweber u,firedistrictl.org> wrote: Mr. Hatton; I am writing in reference to the Building located at 144 Railroad Ave, Edmonds, WA 98202. One of the tenants in the building gave me your contact information and stated that you manage or own the building. A fire inspection was conducted on 7/17/13 and the following violations were noted: Service fire extinguisher in 151 floor electrical room. (done annually, looks like your building was done in June of 13, but the service company missed this one) Clear access to 1" floor electrical panel. (36" required) Repair emergency lights outside Suites: 100, 202, 216, 3`d floor stairwell, and inside units 301, 302, and 304. Repair exit lights outside Suites 219 and 308. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please call if you have any questions. Kevin Zweber, CFI Fire Inspector Fire Prevention Services 1 Snohomish County Fire District #1 City of Edmonds Fire Marshal Office Office 425-775-7720 Fax 425-775-7721 John Hatton John@tesseragroupllc.com http://www.tesseragroupllc.com 206.395.5442 office 206.255.4175 mobile 206.260.2936 fax IMS 3013 3rd AVE NORTH SEATTLE, WA 98109 MEL (206)284-1721 (800) 223-FIRE AAA (206) 284-1769 FAX Fm1s"'y w-- AAA.FIRE.COM Address Occupied as: J Building Gwftr: �s FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOICE # Confidence Testing ACCOUNT # AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER �SYSTEM DATE Aj&#- Al - City: Zip Code Address: City: Date of Inspection: 1000J/3 Type of Inspection: nual Other r Tester's Name (PLEASE PRINT) T BQ.La.Q,i �h�I . �(�( SFD Certification # J3N /T-lZ45P ;L DRY SYSTEM 1. Trip test (dry trip) cond ct d: System tripped in seconds 2. All flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells tested 3. Alarm Bell operates: 4. Flow tests conducted: Static Pressure psi Flow pressure psi % 2 inch drain? 5. Systems inspected and lubricated 6. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes 7. Systems drained and restores to normal operations 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? WET SYSTEM ��dtiafety, 1. Flow test conducted: `` y�ete Cerriri, rke ^i Static Pressure psi Flow Pressure psi 2 inch drain? - 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells, tested 3. Alarm bell operates: 4. Systems inspected and lubricated: 5. Pressure regulating valves tested: 'h'OUSh Deaetcebe�,`y GENERAL , 1. Central Station Monitoring? Name of Company 2. Location of Sprinkler: Basement Hallways As Designed �/_ Others _ 3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed 4. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old C<�y (153) 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available 6. Systems left in service 7. Valves are sealed or supervised 8. Signs are provided on valves 9. City Static Water Pressure — /4/psi PROBLEMS FOUND: Date corrected Zip Code: Yes r No Yes Vol, No N/A Yes :Z7 No N/A Yes V/' No Yes No Yes I- No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes VINO N/A ✓, Yes No Other _ Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No N/A N/A Yes / No Yes V No Yes No Yes �No Yes No Yes o Yes YNo THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SPRIN54R SYSTEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER THE ITEMS LISTED IN THI P SIGNATURE OF TESTER SFD LICENSE # _ f T l 00S7Z) 7- Form #: 8304 FIRE PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmonds 12425 Meridian Ave S INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH CO. FIRE Mountlake Terrace,and Everett, WA 98208 EDMOS ❑BRIER BRIER _ the. -Town of Woodway� "DISTR T Phone (425) 551-1200 ❑ M O NT AY ❑ AKE TERRACE wwwFireDistrictl.org Fax (425) 551-1272 UNINCORPORATED ❑UNINCORPORATED FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 144 Railroad Avenue BLDG ass 17 C I BUSINESS NAME: �i8t$r¢rSkfit Park Bldg PHONE: 4257712813 SCHEDULED 3 DATE DUE ► ®�?Q7 %1..t MAILING 144 Railroad Ave #301 UFIR ► sOg 6202 ADDRESS: Edmonds 98020 s BUSINESS OWNER: MCriSUghlorl, Mark HOME PHONE: 206542,3494 PREFIR.E EMERGENCY-1: CeIV 425-473-1114 HOME PHONE: CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOMES PHONE: CITY YES NO m BUSINESS LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: V 10 . lC FIRE AS 7/11 FA 7111 F kB �� ' FE 6 /I SYSTEMS: t o/ I -� '� � �`17 — ) ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS Y\ , A. 2 s 2 3 3 4 4 5 `, 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: - 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: i 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 4 6 DATE: DISPOSITION: LETTER NEEDED. ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO 8 FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY Kevin Zweber From: johnrhatton12@gmail.com on behalf of John Hatton [John@tesseragroupllc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:55 PM To: Kevin Zweber Subject: Re: 144 Railroad Ave Hi Kevin: The corrections have been completed. Best regards, John On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Kevin Zweber <kZweber(a,firedistrictl.org> wrote: Thanks, please let me know when they are complete. From: johnrhattonl2@gmail.com [maiIto: johnrhattonl2@gmail.coml On Behalf Of John Hatton Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 12:43 PM To: Kevin Zweber Subject: Re: 144 Railroad Ave We'll get these items taken care of. Thanks for the heads up. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Kevin Zweber <kZweber(&,firedistrictl.org> wrote: Mr. Hatton; I am writing in reference to the Building located at 144 Railroad Ave, Edmonds, WA 98202. One of the tenants in the building gave me your contact information and stated that you manage or own the building. A fire inspection was conducted on 7/17/13 and the following violations were noted: Service fire extinguisher in 1 t floor electrical room. (done annually, looks like your building was done in June of 13, but the service company missed this one) Clear access to 1" floor electrical panel. (36" required) Repair emergency lights outside Suites: 100, 202, 216, 3`d floor stairwell, and inside units 301, 302, and 304. Repair exit lights outside Suites 219 and 308. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please call if you have any questions. Kevin Zweber, CFI Fire Inspector Fire Prevention Services Snohomish County Fire District # 1 City of Edmonds Fire Marshal Office Office 425-775-7720 Fax 425-775-7721 John Hatton iohn@tesseragroupllc.com http://www.tesseragroupllc.com 206.395.5442 office 206.255.4175 mobile 206.260.2936 fox 3013 3rd AVE NORTH 4<1)WXt>5FIRE DEPARTMENT INVOICE # T:�I5' 37 kkk SEATTLE, WA 98109 (206) 284-1721 Confidence Testing ACCOUNT # 21/5� 5' AR R (800) 223-FIRE (206) 284)-1769 FAX AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM DATE 7 FNE&SAFETYM.• Address City: ��/�� S /u 7 ��/�� Zip Code SS ,,^^ // Occupied as: �/ /�/�6i'O!�%/ �`�/PL'� = Building Owner: Ph. # Address: ------ — City: —�� Zip Code: Date of Inspection: 5� ,-z Type of Inspection: Annual Other Tester's Name (PLEASE PRINT) <L f4(.�5 116141 SFD Certification # DRY SYSTEM 16 / & / ✓ 1. Trip test (dry trip) conducted: Yes No System tripped in /S seconds !"J 2. All flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells teste t t L/ No N/A 3. Alarm Bell operates: JUN 2 5 2007 a No N/A 4. Flow tests conducted: Static Pressure psi M ONDS FIRE DEP�S �No Flow pressure ! psi 2 inch drain? Yes No 5. Systems inspected and lubricated Yes ✓ No 6. Air compressor refills system in 30 minutes Yes k,,*� No 7. Systems drained and restores to normal operations Yes _� No 8. Were the heat actuation devices tested on pre -action and deluge systems? Yes No N/A WET SYSTEM 1. Flow test conducted: Yes ✓ No Static Pressure 2© psi Flow Pressure ` L psi 2 inch drain? / Yes t/ No Other 2. Flow switches, supervisory switches & alarm bells, tested Yes No N/A 3. Alarm bell operates: Yes No N/A 4. Systems inspected and lubricated: Yes No N/A 5. Pressure regulating valves tested: Yes No c/ N/A GENERAL / 1. Central Station Monitoring? Yes ✓ No Name of Company 2. Location of Sprinkler: Basement Hallways As Designed Others 3. Pumper connections and clapper valves unobstructed Yes No 4. Sprinkler heads less than 50 years old Yes No 5. Spare sprinkler heads are available �� Yes ✓ No 6. Systems left in service +� �acertme Yes No 7. Valves are sealed or supervised 4�o �fQ, '► Yes ✓ No 8. Signs are provided on valves °''t` m �4� Yes _ Z No 9. City Static Water Pressure psi 3 10. Recalled Heads F und? Yes No PROBLEMS FOUND: CORRECTIONS MADE: Date corrected By THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM HAS BEEN PROPERLY TESTED AND INSPECTED FOR RELIABILITY TO COVER THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS REPOR SIGNATURE OF TESTER /I %G�'(_ SFD LICENSE # Form #: 83M Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM May 31, 1996 Jeannine Graf, Building Official John Westfall, Fire Inspector 144 Railroad Avenue Proiected Improvements Regarding our meeting with Mr. McNaughton on May 29; memo dtd May 29, 1996 from Building Official; and following discussion with the Fire Marshal in reference to these plans, the Fire Department comments upon proposal are as follows: 1. This building is fully sprinklered, any voids or spaces created by project must be regarded as requiring sprinklers unless henceforth excepted. NFPA 13, 4-5.1 (UBC Standard 9-1, ?). 2. Parking area is to remain sprinklered if alternative and approved method of fire protection is employed upon structural members. Voids or spaces created by improvement may require sprinklering. 3. Removal of the two easterly deck stairs between 2nd-3rd floor are not a concern as long as your occupant load calculations, number and required widths for third floor exiting can be accomodated by stairway enclosures and those exits are so designated. 4. Removal of the stairway off the second floor deck to public way at the N.E. comer may compromise second story exiting as there is a (designated?) exit to the east at mid -structure. Again, as long as combined second and third floor exiting can be accomodated by stairway enclosures: no problem. 5. Mansard roof improvement shall be draft -stopped: UBC 708.3.1.2 The Fire Department concurs with Building Department on exiting exception of memo. cc: Fire Marshal Gary McComas Plans Examiner Ann Bullis City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Prevention Y Date: To: From: Subject: MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIAL May 29, 1996 Gary McComas, Fire Marshal Jeannine L. Graf, Building Official 0-16, Waterfront Building @ 144 Railroad Avenue Jeff McNaughton of Butterfield Design has made a verbal request to remove the two existing exterior stairs located on the east side of the Waterfront building. As you may recall these were the additional exit stairs added in 1984 to accommodate the restaurant banquet room occupant load increase. I checked the original approved plans and found that the exiting scheme was approved under the UBC 3302c Exception which states "where exit enclosures are provided as the required means of egress and are interconnected by a corridor conforming to the requirements of 3304(g), exit separations may be measured in a direct line of travel within the exit corridor. Enclosure walls shall not be less than 30 feet apart at any point in a direct line of measurement." Please refer to the attached copy of the original approved second floor plan. 1. The exit enclosures are one hour construction and placed more than 30 feet apart; 2. The direct line of travel within the corridor is 65 feet on one side and 86 feet on the other (94 feet required); 3. The corridors are noted to be one hour fire resistive construction with protected openings Based on this it appears the exception was instituted and the exiting approved (even though the direct line of travel was 8 feet short of exactly one-half the diagonal). The new proposal is to create executive office suites (4 or 5 plan attached) on the third floor and to have a corridor system very similar to the second floor. Based on the exiting exception and the proposed use (occupant load 127 calculated by architect) it appears that both east exterior stairs may be removed. If you concur I will be sending a memo to the architect with the following conditions: 1. Verify stair enclosures are one hour fire resistive construction and all openings are protected or fire rated for one hour, i.e., doors. 2. The proposed corridor must conform to one hour fire resistive construction with protected openings. 3. The path of travel within the corridor must be a total of one half the diagonal of the building which according to the original approved plans is 94 feet. 4. Caution on creating individual office spaces that exceed 30 occupants which will require a second exit (spaced one half the diagonal of the suite) into the rated corridor. City of Edmonds cQ Community Services MEMORANDUM DATE I.D. REPORTED BYOF SUBJECT ,` ADDRESS: P CONCERNS/ ��7o O/C cv-s V f--x HAZARDS: G.—,�n An 1/L� [./ 7 CT SIGNED Fou.ow-up: 1 PtA,.,5 QQ-o-v, pcs0 Fo a- S 30�c9-L SIGNED City of Edmonds S) Office of Fire Prevention ! 5 T FLOOR DECK 208- 210 206 � r214 �216 212 Zoo � z �a z02 LO 22 201 E LOBBY BLDG. OFFICE 203 205 33 35 N29 207 209 211 � 213 (21712191 E 225 215 1 221 1 223 144 RAILROAD AVE. Sit*ei Nome dad Addnu REGENCY BUILDING Nawo •1 comwy of accaNacy DECK 2 N D FLOOR 0 n lu D AD C m -.4 m 0 0 K 7�nmo v m f rF I 0 rn z sor..1M 4 RAILROAD AVE u•. u/ Adress waftsRE REGENCY BUILDING of r •..cc,y.,,r 0 m •1 7,D Z A - Passenger Elevator Improvements Sketch U - Freight Elevator C - South Stairwell D'-' Nortli 'St•airwell E - neceptionist- F - Conference noon] G - Men's nestroom If - Women's nest'room k . North . 1Y I - Dec 7C n M C7 d O (Tt n aoy a�1 003 >4 H IJ L-,---_j ao-1 CONF r-• �, a31 a 13 n aa, al D. ato y,� L AA/ STE # TENANT 101 TEDRICKS 0�- ✓ 112 TEDRICKS OK-, 102 TRIPPLE & TRIPPLE " i� 106 SEACLEAR - STORAGEoK ✓/ 105 TELEPHONE SERVICE ✓�' 107 HERITAGE BENEFITS OIL l 108 K FISHERIES, INC. o►L 109 FUNDING RESOURCES / 111 RICHARD CASH CPA GK. . ✓ 201 EXECUTIVE SERVICES 01�- 202 DENNIS JOHNSON CPA 0"' 203 BROWN & BROWN 204 RICHARD CASH CPA OIL 206 207 SEACLEAR INDUSTRIESV- 208 ARTOU 211 ML GATES & ASSOC 212 RICE GROUP 214 RICE GROUP - STORAGE 215 THREESA MILLIGAN 216 AVERY DENNISON 219 TOM TYNAN CPA 220 221 CITICORP 04- ✓ 222 PPF FINANCIALQ'L 223 TELARC INTL 0�- 224 ACCESS COMPUTERS 225 NW VEHICLES 226 BARLAMENT & SON v 227 228 UNDERWRITERS LAB ✓ 229 HART T,,IMER 230 NPI, INC / 231 LIFT -TECH INTL 232 JBH, INC. Fri J 233 BNC GROUP of CONFERENCE ROOM 0K 300 FISHHOUSE CHARLIES TOTALS G bl ti A - Passenger Elevator Improvements Sketch U 1 Freight Elevator C - SouLh Stairwell D'- florth -Stairwell E - flecep L-ion i st F - Conference (loom G - Men's flestroom II - Women' s fles Lroom I - Deck 7C ll• t7' C7 C7 O a l i 003 �- ao7 Mc NF 11• n, tj u O O x a0`� ro s �)o:� I * I 013 apo ��S a►a ato " A - Passenger Elevator B - Freight Elevator C - South Stairwell D - North Stairwell E - Men's Restroom F - Women's Restroom C - Mailboxes !i - Parking 1 1L>l ♦ lvvl 10 > 1-0 L. � o a a v�o n North --� -�� 0rnXM<on 7 'D 'o O X rn rn � Z Ln r N r � rn —i n A.-,^ssenger Elevator Improvements Sketch `©i- Freight Elevator C - South Stairwell D'--North•Stairwell E Receptionist F - Conference Room G - Men's nestroom H - Women's nestroom I - Deck rn D p o � a''S altfl at► ao- � ' -1 003 CoNF a31 alp -� D f ass _ North ` d D O O n rn x a04 aoS ato V - 0 n x env o su, +e ? )01 -- --l-b - S - �!f - -S I-o �a �'✓ 14 L.. ? 30 ►1v Si,� ,�� ;z 32, a- 3 3 ) l D No 5L.�,�-e 134 no V le o{ Wuooi I ` 1 I Z vac- a�--- --- --- ion aoi A�c�ss �1pd«I alb; Ylo -- av t-TAvlsu; - - 203 O &*YY \ 0 1 e uJ� �i 5 SAS OL{ �USh Ct'� W,,,4, Fvvnt' {�a�Ic-f�SSaC '- - - a) 6 Gooks e►-t.S. 5`k I- . a o u r<U S i} �. 2 0 Avlr,QR.v u1 V-CA FPe S-1 I -el, j�A- 272- 40f, S+f,110,UW �Dah i o vio 5 (A l$C 0 5 V, a� 3__ ro 76�? 71K i� xG.-. V kW.- - - ' � - ------ - --- --- ----E-T. DON L FIQ T _.OF:1_ CC E 1?/01/92 A 1'�35 ` OLYMPIC AV 596 001 - -- EDMONDS ELEM SCHOOL - - — -- -------...---- 11/01/92 ------- A _ B 1_4.03�-----OLYMF'IC...—.-- AV__.._.. _-_--_----_.-.._.....--_--OLYME'.I.C-.VIEW-_AF'TS.._& 21:3 001 11 0254 __i4.05... 1407 1409 .... 11/01/91 A A.._--.... 1233 OLYMPIC VIEW DR 422 004 11 B304 PAGE & ASSOCIATES INC 11/01/92 . A _.. _ B oLYMFIC:..._V_IEW-------LC�--------- :... ------DLY�F'IC_CLEANEkS.-------.-_---------------------_.. 591 001 11 B304 1302 OLYMPIC VIEW UT't 545' 001 11 0304 JOHN S BARBER SHOP 11 /01 /91. A A -OLYMPIC-VIEW--.___.._..Dlt__._.___._� .._.._.>-_..._.W.._.LONItOi�!_E'i.Ihh:_.HAIRSTYLING-._-A.----- 557 001 11 0304 1306 OLYMPIC VIEW DR 557 002 It 0304 PORTO FINO PIZZA & SPAGHETTI HOUSE 11/01/92 A B __5Q0. .__-_'ARADISE--.-.._...._..._..___LN.....-......-_.__...... 161 080 11 0304 A .. 423 012 05 B 1.03 .--------- --- --P 400 PINE ST PARK VIEW APARTMENTS 11/01/92 A C _ 4.10. ._...FINE ._ . ST 425 024 11 Bi52 KENNEDY_ APTS 11/01/92 A 505 PINE ST 423 007 1.1 B:1.52 EMERALD CREST CONDO 1.2/01/92 A --C - C .P.INE ST 423 010 1.2 B 1.53 SEACREc$T _C:ONIl0S...... 1.2/01./9.2. A �= 528 PINE ST 423 020 12 B 153 PINNEO MICHEL_ 5 PLEX - 12/01/92 A - C --._ B31. PUGET. DR 422 005 12 Bi53 KAREN' S DAYCARE -.- -- 11/01/92 A B 1011 PUGET DR 312 411 1.1 0303 OLYMPIC VIEW DELI 11/01/92 A B DR. 51.2 001 11 B304 LES.TER-..WALT.... INS.__AGENC..Y_.._...-----_._......._....__.._._..__ :?_--......---.. ............. 411 001 11 0304 _-11/01./ .A...._. .... __.. ._ .._. 1055 PUGET DTI JOYCE APTS THE 11/01/91 A A --.100.... ..-RAILROAD AV 423 010 11 B304 ANDERSON_.MARINE. INC.- _-_-- _ __-- --7/.01/_92 A A- 101 RAILROAD AV 576 001 07 B202 DIAMOND PARKING INC _ 7/01/92 --- A .._ A _-...__RAILROAD..._. ..._.. ._ _.AV. 965 001 07 0202 144 RAILROAD AV a1! 102 557 101 05 0202 TRIPPLE TRIPPLE & TRIPPLE 5/01/93 A B 545 102 05 0202 1 .1 2 4- 1 of O.ele�e co 1 V Z �o� - (�2vqusovt �- C-, ate -now - �G11 ��Ny 7c�hn5r�t C�� a v 3 ? Mar \,;^ m a o CQ 0) tI ,2o 7 now Sep, ptvbe c aU 8 f1„+o4) 6 cnv�w � Sranhrm) (�� g,lei' ►� Co✓1 a Lee CD-vp, i AM FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION FILE BY ADDRESS -------- BUSINESS ------BUSINESS NAME--------- FRC STREET NAME TYPE DIR SUITE OCC UNITS MON MAP DATE FREQ SFT ..144 RAILROAD AV Ntvt e. 104...; TRIPPLE TRIPPLE & TRIPPLE 5/01/93 A B 1591, 104 05* 0202 SoLziLd C=12a_n�- .144 ___ _VA_ CANTI 5/01/92` A A, V/ 591 --- le'xr'- 05 020-7- 144 RAILROAD AV Oek�-e, 106, ✓STORAGE FOR SUITE 0102 5/01/93 A B 591 106 05 0202 R �aucAiIIDNA_ _As 591107 0'::' 0*2202 .144' RAILROAD AV '109 VACANT Fer4kswn -b- tc�lp ) 77v� I 5/01/92 A A V - 591 _T0905 0202 - _,I_44___RAILROAD...__ 5/01/92 A A 591 111 05 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 201 WAT+-.T-ZFTZrJiqT-T-*-AF'�K--r-fUTL--DTfIG-fxecc&14;1*,P-*VM"/Z;i:�-_O 1/92 A A 591 037 05 B202 -RAILROAD AV 202--..- ST94=f=A-F<-F-ROF"Ef<i'-!-F-,9--kW. 6/01/92. A A 591 202 06 0202 1.44 RAILROAD AV 203 VACANT 6/01/92 A A C:*91 203 06 0202 RAT LROAD AV 204-V'---.--.- .-..WA'TERFRONT-. PARK -.ASSOC- INC... 6/01/92 A. A 591 204 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 206 IUE-XW-:r:-ICE CONNECTION 6/01/92 A A ✓ 59:1. 206 06 0202 _14-44_ -RAILROAD. .... ENTERPRISES T4, _6401/92., A ..A 591 20t 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 208 V-11 ARTOWMAGNET/1-:4RANHAM 0\11a?- IDAS"55 (It- 6/01/92 A A 1/ 591 208 06 0202 1.44- -RAILROAD AV--.-..- .._._...__OHI_0_NATIONAL. ...... A/ 591 209 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 210 FlARaQRU_TN-T -lL-FRE.MHT-T-Nc. L-c e- Cov p 6/01/92 A A 591, 210 06 0202 2 MM IS* INC 6/01/92 A 144 RAILROAD AV 212 RICE GROUP 6/01/92 A A v1 591 212 06 0202 -4-4--_ LROAD,. 6/01/92 A A -1. AV 0-4�14 fw 2 13 Zyco K-K- 144 RAILROAD AV CLeW\t, 214 B 591 21S A A V/ 591 214 06 002 AV jacmouf 21.5 ':)6/01/92 A A 591 2A 5 06 020. 144 RAILROAD AV 2116 YAeAtqT- �StAAYWM t- 3?$WAsovt 6/01/92 A A 591 216 CF6 0202 144.... RAILROAD AV 591 217 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 218 V.AQpd+T -.c",jh-p_5 6/01/92 A A 591 218 06 0202 144., .__RAIL.ROAD AV. 0.-d'tflt, 219. VACANT-__... ...... ...... 591 219 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 220 UNDERWRITERS LAB INC 6/01/92 A A V1 -RAILROAD AV. 591 06 0202 221-,.--- A- 591 221 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 222 vAeANT S+e-tl& Chttr.R 6/01/92 A A 591 222 06 0202 _IA4. . RAILROAD. AV 223 591 223� db 0202 144 RAILROAD AV votcaA4_225) C 6/01/92 A RAILROA-1-1-- ..AV 22 591 225 06 0202 --A _V -591 _ 227 0202 144 RIATI _RnATl AV 229 HAR I A/01/92 A A 591 214 06 0202 _—144--------.RAILROAD AV ....... ...215. --- -- h .Y_Oi�I-�+FCJC�- �i�tC_ _... _.. - --- - --- -. _-------- 6/Oi/92.--- - A._�. 591 21 v 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 216 VACANT 6/0.1/92 A. 591 216 06 0202 _ 1.44_..._... _RAILROAD AV 217 _ BLUEWATER._..SYS1'EMS_..--.-_- .. _ 640.1/-_92._ 591 217 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 218 VACANT 6/01/92 A 591 218 06 0202 _......__-_._..__1.44._... ..._._RAIL.ROAD 21'�__._.._._._. ... AS1......__._..._...__-......_VIaCAT.!_T____.....__....___._.__-...._.__.....--_.--...._._......__.._.._------_-_....._��_----�.____6/_Qi/_..Q2__._____ 591 219 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 220 UNDERWRITERS LAB INC 6/01/92 A 591. 2:20 06 0202 144._-.__...._..__. RAILROAD AV ..... _...___._.._221........__....._.......�lACAN-T. W...._..._...__.._.____.....__.._._...---_---__.._:_._...._._...__..__.__._.__-......___.._.----.___6/_OiL9.2-------.._.._ A_----- 591 2:21 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 222 VACANT 6/01/9:2 A 591 2:22 06 0202 _-.._..RAILROAD.._ AV _.... _. 223... ____.___.___NOVA_ -REHAB COUNSELING..I..__640149-2 .-.........._...fit.____._._ 591 223 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 225 TIET7_E ERIC O & ASSOC INC 6/01/92 A 591 225 06 0202 RAILROAD AV 227. THOMAS. E...._TYNAN C.'E'.A._:. _ 6/._O_i/..9:'... A.. 591 227 06 0202 / 144 RAILROAD AV 229 HART LATIME.R ASSOC INC b/01/9? A 591 229 06 0202 _�.-...- _-_- ._. RAILROAD. .. AV__ ... ........231 _...._ ._.._.....L�IF'T. TECH.:INTERNAT.1':ONAL........ .._-_........._..... .__.._.._.__._.._...__falQi/92_.. 591 231 06 0202 144 RAILROAD AV 233 %0 ei-VOFFEE ROOM 6/01/92 A� 591 :3 °0¢ 6 ..RAILROAD. AV._._ __ ....._..__ .. .._ VA6,44. ed�-W�qJ� l � ---- -. - --- --- /._01/__9_.2.- A - -- .- 591 235 06 06292 144 RAILROAD AV 30. FF'ISHHOUSE CHARLIE'S 5/01/93 A 161 300 05 0202 _ 21,1_ _RAILROAD _...... _....�...AV __ ___.__.. At'iIFAh�TiEF'0. �_._._-._.._.....__.__ �_ ------ .._.._.........-.------.--.---._Z/._Q1/_92.__....._._-_A---.--- 176 O? O? E+ 02 220 RAILROAD AV 100 COUNTRYBOUTIQUE 7/01/9:2 A 545 002 07 0202 All-C)av- zo NAME SUITE # NAME SUITE # ACCESS MEDICAL 20,1 ✓ MILES, TERRY A. ARTOU 208J MMIS, INC. BAUMAN, ROBERT 208 J OHIO NATIONAL LIFE BRANHAM NEWSPAPER 208 ✓ RICE, ROBERT BLUE WATER SYSTEMS 217V RICE GROUP ENGINEERS BUMP, WILLIAM 222\ ROBERTS, MARK CASH, RICHARD, CPA' 204`/ SEACLEAR INDUSTRIES CHRISTENSEN/ WES 220+',/ SPERBECK, SCOTT CLARK, JIM 218 ✓/ STELLA CHEESE DESILET, DEAN 208 J SWANSON, RICHARD C. EN -CON 208 ✓ TEDRICK, EMERY & DOROTHY EXECUTIVE SERVICES 201\/ V/TEDRICK'S HAIR SALON FERGUSON & COLE, INC. 109-V TELARC INTERNATIONAL Nova (Zehab br�selvy FISHHOUSE CHARLIES 300:J TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY HALL, ALAN F., ATTORNEY 202v/ TRIPPLE, LARRY HART-LATIMER ASSOC.; INC. 229V TRIPPLE, ROB IGM 221V !'RIPPLE, TRIPPLE, TRIPPLE INWARDS, GARY 229J TYNAN, THOMAS, CPA r JOHNSON, DENNIS, CPA 202 ✓ UNDERWRITERS LAB, INC. JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL 216,✓ WATERFRONT PARK ASSOC., INC. LEE CORPORATION 210✓ WEDGWOOD CAPITAL b6Yu �h�. ��"M 1 -Do lib / LIFT -TECH INTERNATIONAL 231.J WILKES, TOM MANNING, J.J. 221\/ WRIGHT, CHRIS MARLIN MAGAZINE 203✓ ZEUS COMPONENTS .�/ 13vvcle- `t..L_ V �(C � \ �.l S� h2 041- Z.1 Cowlw� eon- ee 1 000A VaCCtAA Associates March 28, 1988 City of Edmonds 250 - 5th Ave. North Edmonds, Washington 98020 ATTN: Gary L. McComas RE: Re -spraying of steel structural members in parking garage Dear Mr. McComas: In a phone conversation with Mayor Naughten this morning he stated that he had spoken with Robert Pantley over the week -end regarding the re -spraying of the steel structural members in the covered parking garage of the Regency Building. Mayor Naughten informed me that the results of the conversation were the following. Recommendation from the City of Edmonds for a liquor license and other permits required of the new restaurant for their operation in the Regency Building would not be delayed by the City if a letter of intent to have the work completed prior to the restaurant opening was received. I have spoken with Mr. Pantley today and he has confirmed to me that this arrangement had been discussed and that the work would be completed prior to the restaurant opening. Thank you for your patience. Sincerely, . OAK j� Joan A. Slyngstad Building Manager JS/ca CC: Vinit Chitnis Robert Pantley RECEIVED MAR 3 01988 EDMONDS c1^' DEPT. 144 Railroad Avenue, Suite #201 Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone (206) 774-2099 CITY OF EDMONOS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR March 29, 1988 Joan Slyngstad Building Manager PDM Associates 144 Railroad Avenue - Suite #201 Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Joan: TARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR I discussed the situation regarding the requirement to re -spray the steel structure members in the parking garage with Robert Pantley. Rather than hold up the liquor license, I have agreed to accept a letter of agreement from PDM that they will complete the re -spraying in specific areas that have been identified by our Building Depart- ment, prior to final occupancy by Mr. Quinn. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS L" arryS� Nau hten Y 9 Mayor LSN/db cc: Robert Pantley ,vJack:=Wei,nz.,,,,,Fi re .Chief Hal Reeves, Building Inspector City Clerk RECEIVED MAR - 01988 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. March 25, 1988 MEMO TO: Larry S. Naughten Mayor / VIA: Jack D. Wein Fire Chief FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: FIRE PROOFING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AT 144 RAILROAD AVENUE I was questioned by the Chief in regards to the possibility of allow- ing the re -opening of the restaurant prior to the application of the required fire proofing. It is my opinion that the City should not obligate itself to this type of liability when the City has made every effort to correct the problem. I offer, for your review, a chronicle of our past efforts: 1. March 15, 1982 Minutes of the Board of Appeals 2. August 24, 1984 Letter to Mr. Pantley 3. October 24, 1984 Memo from Hal Reeves to your attention 4. October 6, 1986 Memo from Chief Weinz to your attention 5. November 5, 1986 Letter from Chief Weinz to Mr. Pantley 6. November 24, 1986 Memo from Fire Marshal to Building Official I think, after reviewing the correspondence, you will understand our reluctance to accept any date of compliance after the restaurant's re -opening. GLM:be BOARD OF APPEALS March 15, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Allan Albers at 7:45 p.m. in the Planning Department Conference Room. MEMBERS PRESENT Allan Albers Larry Trent Paul Nolan Jack Whiteley MINUTES MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Walt Payne Hal Reeves, Building Official Sam Ewing Gary McComas, Fire Marshal Cindy Noack, Recording Secretary MR. NOLAN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. TRENT, TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 18, 1982 MEETING MINUTES AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Albers asked the members if they received and reviewed the information sent on the revisions to the Fire Code. Those members present stated they had and suggested that the item be on next meeting's agenda. AGENDA BA-3-82 Alternate method of fireproofing for structural steel in parking area on first level of building at 144 Railroad Avenue. Mr. Albers read the letter from Kirk Black of Pantley's,'Inc. requesting an alternate method of fireproofing the steel columns, beams, and girders in the covered parking area. Mr. Reeves asked Mr. Whiteley if the building would still stand up if fireproofing of the trusses was omitted as requested. Mr. Whiteley responded that the building might if the main columns and frames were fireproofed but the trusses would buckle and the floors will come down. Mr. Reeves stated that a sprinkler system is not required in this building per the Uniform Building Code. A sprinkler system allows for area increases and increase in the number of stories allowed but it is not a substitution for occupancy separation. The situation at the above building is a parking garage and commercial habital space above it and the code requires a 1-hour occupancy separation, and the sprinklers in this case -are not a substitution. Mr. Albers asked if the board could make a recommendation on this item without the applicant present. Mr. Reeves stated that the City Attorney advised that the board could, the applicant is not required to show at the meeting. The board asked what the floor area is in the building and Mr. Reeves stated that the first floor has 4,900 sq. ft. of occupied space and the rest is parking, the second floor has 12,580 sq. ft. of occupied space and the.third floor has 11,166 occupied space and extra decking. The restaurant comprises of about 7,000 sq. ft. on the third floor. The basic allowable for Type V-1-hour construction is 14,000 sq. ft. plus area increases are allowed for distance from property lines and in this case there is a street on one side and water on the other. They meet the allowable area and are not required to have sprinkler system. Mr. Reeves stated that it is the applicant'sidea that if the columns and main members where fireproofed, the sprinkler system would allow for the secondary members to be unprotected. BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES March 15, 1982 Page 2 Mr. McComas stated that the building is to be Type V-1-hour construction and if you don't apply anything to the steel it is not 1-hour construction. The original plan for the parking area was to have a drop ceiling which would be 1-hour rated. Then the plan was changed to spray all the steel members. Mr. McComas said he was satisfied that the spraying would give the 1-hour cover to everything that was sprayed but now they do not want to do either of the plans and he felt this alternate proposal should be denied and they should be forced to spray all the structural members or apply sheetrock. Mr. Albers stated that he could see their problem with spraying the trusses that it would affect the sprinkler system, but if the sprinkler heads were lowered below the trusses then he couldn't see any problem with spraying the trusses. It was the board's opinion that the area in question should be satisfactorily sprayed or sheetrocked. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE -REQUEST SINCE IT DOES NOT MEET THE 1-HOUR FIRE RATING. ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE EITHER SPRAYED, SHEETROCKED OR SOME OTHER FIREPROOFING METHOD. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Trent, Mr. Whiteley, Mr. Nolan voted yes, Mr. Albers voted no. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE APPLICATION REQUEST ON THE BASIS THAT IT DOES NOT MEET BUILDING CODE OR FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE PROTECTED. MOTION CARRIED. MR. WHITELEY MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. NOLAN TO RE-ELECT ALAN ALBERS AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. MOTION CARRIED. There was no further business to come before the board and the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. CITY OF EOMONOS 250 51h AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771 3202 BUILDING DIVISION August 24, 1984 Mr. Robert Pantley 51 W. Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Pantley: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR It is indeed unfortunate that you cancelled for the second time our meeting relating to life safety code violations in your building at 144 Railroad Avenue. You have, however, been verbally informed of the problems. To confirm our August 14, 1984 conversation, the first floor parking garage is required to have a 1 hour fire resistive occupancy separation from the offices, shops, and restaurant (UBC 104 d). All openings in such separations shall be protected by fire assemblies having a 1 hour fire protective rating (UBC 503 c). The existing aluminum and glass "store front" door does not comply. Required fireproofing of structural members in the garage is deteriorating and must be maintained to insure 1 hour fire resistive integrity (UBC 104 d). Tenants on the first floor continue to prop open their entry doors, which are to remain closed to protect the fire resistivity of the cooridor, which is a part of the re-. quired exit for those on the floors above (UBC 104, 3305). You continue to use the south portion of the third floor as a banquet facility without minimum exiting as required by UBC 33. By letter dated July 18, 1984, you were told that this use must cease immediately until proper exiting is provided. The combination of these code violations is creating a serious threat to the safety and welfare of the occupants of your building. We have been, and continue to be, receptive to meeting with you. How- ever, please understand that the City has an obligation to our citizens to insure conformance to State mandated fire and building codes, and this will require a firm committment on your part. We are asking for your full cooperation in resolving this matter, to avoid legal proceedings. Please contact the Building Division within three (3) days of this letter. (.,A GLIoq,� Pam Harold Reeves Building Official HR/tq cc: file MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 24, 19.4 Mayor Naughten Harold Reeves Building Official UPDATE ON THE REGENCY BUILDING SAFETY PROBLEMS Despite our efforts to obtain compliance with the City's life safety codes, Mr. Pantley continues to operate the Regency Building at 144 Railroad Avenue with occupancy and exiting code violations which threaten the safety of the public. The following is my analysis of the current situation. The plans were submitted and approved for one hour fire resistive. construction between the parking garage (B-1 occupancy) and the restaurant (A-2.1 occupancy). However, I am in receipt of a recent opinion by the International Conference of Building Officials which holds that the required separation should be 3 hour instead of one hour. To make up the difference would require the addition of more fireproofing to the structural steel and the installation of a 3 hour fire door assembly. One hour construction was provided but there is no fire door at all between the parking garage and the 1st floor corridor serving exit 7#1 from the restaurant. This is a great hazard to the restaurant occupants. Section 3303 and 3318 of the UBC require that the A-2.1 restaurant have a main exit capable of accomodating 1/2 the total occupant load. Thus, the existing exits for the building would limit th.e total number on the third floor to 300. This is the limit stated on Mr. Pantley's Certificate of Occupancy, yet he has posted a load limit sign of 377 and states that he has 400 or more people at times on the third floor. Other code violations exist also. Restaurant exit #2 dumps into the parking garage. Plans called for a walkway (never installed), but the code would require a fire resistive corridor to the public way. The first floor lease space appeared originally to be designed for offices but was changed to retail use. The tenants use the fire resistive exit corridor as a mall and prop open the fire doors. If these doors must be open, they should be on smoke detector actuated automatic closure devices. The City Attorney feels that the City has a great liability exposure in this matter. It is my recommendation that efforts be coordinated through the attorney's office to secure compliance with the code as soon as possible. HR/cr MEMO TO: Mayor Naughten FROM: Jack Weinz, Fire Chief Harold Reeves, Building OfPcial *?- DATE: October 6th, 1986 RE: Current Building and Fire Code Violations At 144 Railroad Avenue, Edmonds During our September loth, 1986 meeting, the staff discussed with you ,the ongoing problem of life safety code violations at the Regency Building at 144 Railroad Avenue. We called your attention:to an °Aug st;..24th-,=-1984-letter which Hal wrote to Robert Pantley asking for his cooperation in resolving the matter, and from which no action resulted. We also called your attention to an October.1984.mWfio from Hal to you outlining the problems, and to a 4ovember-1984-14etter from the City Attorney to Community Services Direct6r—Peter-Hahn entitled "Liability of the City and the Building Official for Negligence in Failure to Enforce Determined Violations." During our meeting, we discussed in detail the nature of the code . violations and the potential for a disastrous fire if the situation is not fully corrected. You, in turn discussed with staff the ongoing effort to acquire tidelands from Mr. Pantley for a City project with the State Ferry system. At the conclusion of our meeting, you requested a memo on the current condition of the building. A#cached is a. -list of.the most critical problems and code violations. A{ this time on behalf on. the Fire Department'6hd` uilding Division=:we �_ are requesting a written the on how and, when to .proceed Din o.obtaining compliance with City and -State -building and fire,.codes.�Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. BUILDING & FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS @ 144 RAILROAD AVENUE 1. The fireproofing of the steel structural members in the parking garage is in a deteriorated condition and must be upgraded and certified. 2. All openings between exit ways and the parking garage must be protected with three-hour fire resistive rated assemblies. 3. The corridor doors from the 1st floor retail spaces must be on smoke detector actuated, approved hold -open devices. 4. The main exit for the restaurant, as required by UBC Section 3318, is now through the banquet room. The work on this exit was begun under permit #850146. At this time. due to numerous problems and uncompleted work, this exit system does not comply with the mimimum provisions of UBC Chapter 33. CITY OF E D M O N O S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN .MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 88020 • (206) 775 2525 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT November 3, 1986 Mr. Robert Pantley Restaurant Control Corp. 10900 N. E. 4th, #1827 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Pantley, As we have indicated in the past, there are four major Life Safety Code violations in your building at 144 Railroad Avenue. These violations must be corrected to comply with the City of Edmonds Fire Code Ordinance. As long as these code violations exist, the City is liable for negligence in failure to enforce determined violations. While these violations must be corrected, it is our desire to work with you on a timely schedule that is convenient to you. The schedule must be realistic and not to exceed 60 days. Please call or advise me of your intentions by November loth. Again, we want to work with you and your partners and resolve these problems without being forced into any costly legal remedies. Sincerely, J ck D. fein� F're Chief JDW:be cc: Mayor Larry Naughten Scott Snyder, City Attorney November 24, 1986 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: FIREPROOFING FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL IN PARKING AREA ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF BUILDING AT 144 RAILROAD AVENUE On March 15, 1982 a representative of Pantley's Incorporated came before the Board of Appeal. He was requesting that secondary struc- tural members be omitted from the application of fireproofing mate- rial. At that time it was the opinion of the board that all posts, columns and other structural members must be protected by either an approved spray or that they be protected with sheetrock. It is my observation that the protection that was applied in 1982 has deteriorated to the point that it is no longer effective. It appears that the coating has been adversely effected by mechanical as well as environmental conditions. Because of the current condi- tion of the protection and the certainty that similar protection will similarly deteriorate, I recommend that the second option required by the Board of Appeals be enforced, and further that all structural members be protected as directed in the Uniform Building Chapter 43. GLM:be 0 March 25, 1988 MEMO TO: Larry S. Naughten Mayor VIA: Jack D. Wein1 Fire Chief 1 FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: FIRE PROOFING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AT 144 RAILROAD AVENUE I was questioned by the Chief in regards to the possibility of allow- ing the re -opening of the restaurant prior to the application of the required fire proofing. It is my opinion that the City should not obligate itself to this type of liability when the City has made every effort to correct the problem. I offer, for your review, a chronicle of our past efforts: 1. March 15, 1982 Minutes of the Board of Appeals 2. August 24, 1984 Letter to•Mr. Pantley 3. October 24, 1984 Memo from Hal Reeves to your attention 4. October 6, 1986 Memo from Chief Weinz to your attention 5. November 5, 1986 Letter from Chief Weinz to Mr. Pantley 6. November 24, 1986 Memo from Fire Marshal to Building Official I think, after reviewing the correspondence, you will understand our reluctance to accept any date of compliance after the restaurant's re -opening. GLM:be � _4 BOARD OF APPEALS March 15, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Allan Albers at 7:45 p.m. in the Planning Department Conference Room. MEMBERS PRESENT Allan Albers Larry Trent Paul "Nol an Jack Whiteley MINUTES MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Walt Payne Hal Reeves, Building Official Sam Ewing Gary McComas, Fire Marshal Cindy Noack, Recording Secretary MR. NOLAN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. TRENT, TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 18, 1982 MEETIMG MINUTES AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Albers asked the members if they received and reviewed the information sent on the revisions to the Fire Code. Those members present stated they had and suggested that the item be on next meeting's agenda. AGENDA BA-3-82 Alternate method of fireproofing for structural steel in parking area on first level of building at 144 Railroad Avenue. Mr. Albers read the letter from Kirk Black of Pantley's,'Inc. requesting an alternate method of fireproofing the steel columns, beams, and girders in the covered parking area. Mr. Reeves asked Mr. Whiteley if the building would still stand up if fireproofing of the trusses was omitted as requested. Mr. Whiteley responded that the building might if the main columns and frames were fireproofed but the trusses would buckle and the floors will come down. Mr. Reeves stated that a sprinkler system is not required in this building per the Uniform Building Code. A sprinkler system allows for area increases, -and increase in the number of stories allowed but i't is not a substitution for occupancy separation. The situation at the above building is a parking garage and commercial habital. space above it and the code requires a 1-hour occupancy separation, and the sprinklers in this case are not a substitution. Mr. Albers asked if the board could make a recommendation on this item without the applicant present. Mr. Reeves stated that the City Attorney advised that the board could, the applicant is. not required to show at the meeting. The board asked what the floor area is in the building and Mr. Reeves stated that the first floor has 4,900 sq. ft. of occupied space and the rest is parking, the second floor has 12,580 sq. ft. of.occupied space and the third floor has 11,166 occupied space and extra decking. The restaurant comprises of about 7,000 sq. ft. on the third floor. The basic allowable for Type V-1-hour construction is 14,000 sq. ft..plus area increases are allowed for distance from property lines and in this case there is a street on one side and water on the other. They meet the allowable area and are not required to have sprinkler system. Mr. Reeves stated that it is the applicant'sidea that if the columns and main members where fireproofed, the sprinkler system would allow for the secondary members to be unprotected. `i BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES March 15, 1982 Page 2 Mr. McComas stated that the building is to be Type V-1-hour construction and if you don't apply anything to the steel it is not.l-hour construction. The original plan for the parking area was to have'a drop ceiling which would be 1-hour rated. Then the plan was changed to spray all the steel members. Mr. McComas said he was satisfied that the spraying would•give the 1-hour cover to everything that was sprayed but now they do not want to do either of the plans and he felt this alternate proposal should be denied and they should be forced to spray all the structural members or apply sheetrock. Mr. Albers stated that he could see their problem with spraying the trusses that it would affect the sprinkler system, but if the sprinkler heads were lowered below the trusses then he couldn't see any problem with spraying the trusses. It was the board's opinion that the area in question should be satisfactorily sprayed or sheetrocked.. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE -REQUEST SINCE IT DOES. - NOT MEET THE 1-HOUR FIRE RATING. ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE EITHER SPRAYED, SHEETROCKED OR SOME OTHER FIREPROOFING METHOD. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Trent, Mr. Whiteley, Mr. Nolan voted yes, Mr: Albers voted no. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE APPLICATION REQUEST ON THE BASIS THAT IT DOES NOT MEET BUILDING CODE OR FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE PROTECTED. MOTION CARRIED. MR. WHITELEY MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. NOLAN TO RE-ELECT ALAN ALBERS AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. MOTION CARRIED. There was'no further business to come before the board and the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. „ H CITY OF E O M O N O S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 BUILDING DIVISION August 24, 1984 Mr. Robert Pantley 51 W. Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Pantley: It is indeed unfortunate that you cancelled for the second time our meeting relating to life safety code violations in your building at 144 Railroad Avenue. You have, however, been verbally informed of the problems. To confirm our August 14, 1984 conversation, the first floor parking garage is required to have a 1 hour fire resistive occupancy separation from the offices, shops, and restaurant (UBC 104 d). All openings in such separations shall be protected by fire assemblies having a 1 hour fire protective rating (UBC 503 c). The existing aluminum and glass "store front” door does not comply. Required fireproofing of structural members in the garage is deteriorating and must be maintained to insure 1 hour fire resistive integrity (UBC 104 d). Tenants on the first floor continue to prop open their entry doors, which are to remain closed to protect the fire resistivity of the cooridor, which is a part of the re- quired exit for those on the floors above (UBC 104, 3305). You continue to use the south portion of the third floor as a banquet facility without minimum exiting as required by UBC 33. By letter dated July 1.8, 1984, you were told that this use must cease immediately until proper exiting is provided. The combination of these code violations is creating a serious threat to the safety and welfare of the occupants of your building. We have been, and continue to be, receptive to meeting with you. How- ever, please understand that the City has an obligation to our citizens to insure conformance to State mandated fire and building codes, and this will require a firm committment on your part. We are asking for your full cooperation in resolving this -matter, to avoid legal proceedings. Please contact the Building Division within three (3) days of this letter. HR/tq cc: file Harold Reeves Building Official October 24, 1984 MEMO TO: Mayor Naughten FROM: Harold Reeves Building Official SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE REGENCY BUILDING SAFETY PROBLEMS Despite our efforts to obtain compliance with the City's life safety codes, Mr. Pantley continues to operate the Regency Building at 144 Railroad Avenue with occupancy and exiting code violations which threaten the safety of the public. The following is my analysis of the current situation. The plans were submitted and approved for one hour fire resistive. construction between the parking garage (B-1 occupancy) and the restaurant (A-2.1 occupancy). However, I am in receipt of a recent opinion by the International Conference of Building Officials which holds that the required separation should be 3 hour instead of one hour. To make up the difference would require the addition of more fireproofing to the structural steel and the installation of a 3 hour fire door assembly. One hour construction was provided but there is no fire door at all between the parking garage and the 1st floor corridor serving exit ttl from the restaurant. Th.is is a great hazard to the restaurant occupants. Section 3303 and 3318 of the UBC require that the A-2.1 restaurant have a main exit capable of accomodating 1/2 the total occupant load. Thus, the existing exits for the building would limit th.e total number on the third floor to 300. This is the limit stated on'Mr. Pantley's Certificate of Occupancy, yet he has posted a load limit sign of 377 and states that he has 400 or more people at times on the third floor. Other code violations exist also. Restaurant exit #2 dumps into the parking garage. Plans called for a walkway (never installed), but the code would require a fire resistive corridor to the public way. The first floor lease space appeared originally to be designed for offices but was changed to retail use. The tenants use the fire resistive exit corridor as a mall and prop open the fire doors. If these doors must be open, they should be on smoke detector actuated automatic closure devices. The City Attorney feels that the City has a great liability exposure in this matter. It is my recommendation that efforts be coordinated through the attorney's office to secure compliance with the code as soon as possible. HR/cr MEMO TO: Mayor Naughten FROM: Jack Weinz, Fire Chief Q Harold Reeves, Building Of0c`ial- DATE: October 6th, 1986 RE: Current Building and Fire Code Violations At 144 Railroad Avenue, Edmonds During our September loth, 1986 meeting, the staff discussed with you .,the ongoing problem of life safety code violations at the Regency Building at 144 Railroad Avenue. We called your attention to an August 24th, 1984 letter which Hal wrote to Robert Pantley asking for his cooperation in resolving the matter, and from which no action resulted. We also called your attention to an October 1984 memo from Hal to you outlining the problems, and to a November 1984 letter from the City Attorney to Community Services Director Peter Hahn entitled "Liability of the City and the Building Official for Negligence in Failure to Enforce Determined Violations." During our meeting, we discussed in detail the nature of the code violations and the potential for a disastrous fire if the situation is not fully corrected. You, in turn discussed with staff the ongoing effort to acquire tidelands from Mr. Pantley for a City project with the State Ferry system. At the conclusion of our meeting, you requested a memo on the current condition of the building. Attached is a list of the most critical problems and code violations. At this time on behalf on the Fire Department and Building Division we are requesting a written directive on how and when to proceed in obtaining compliance with City and State building and fire codes. Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. BUILDING & FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS @ 144 RAILROAD AVENUE 1. The fireproofing of the steel structural members in the parking garage is in a deteriorated condition and must be upgraded and certified. 2. All openings between exit ways and the parking garage must be protected with three-hour fire resistive rated assemblies. 3. The corridor doors from the 1st floor retail spaces must be on smoke detector actuated, approved hold -open devices. 4. The main exit for the restaurant, as required by UBC Section 3318, is now through the banquet room. The work on this exit was begun under permit #850146. At this time. due to numerous problems and uncompleted work, this exit system does not comply with the mimimum provisions of UBC Chapter 33. CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT Mr. Robert Pantley Restaurant Control Corp. 10900 N. E. 4th, #1827 Bellevue, WA 98004 Dear Mr. Pantley, LARRY S. NAUGHTEN .MAYOR November 5, 1986 As we have indicated in the past, there are four major Life Safety Code violations in your building at 144 Railroad Avenue. These violations must be corrected to comply with the City of Edmonds Fire Code Ordinance. As long as these code violations exist, the City is liable for negligence in failure to enforce determined violations. While these violations must be corrected, it is our desire to work with you on a timely schedule that is convenient to you. The schedule must be realistic and not to exceed 60 days. Please call or advise me of your intentions by November loth. Again, we want to work with you and your partners and resolve these problems without being forced into any costly legal remedies. Sincerely, �•'-6J ck D. Wei F're Chief JDW:be cc: Mayor Larry Naughten Scott Snyder, City Attorney November 24, 1986 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: FIREPROOFING FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL IN PARKING AREA ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF BUILDING AT 144 RAILROAD AVENUE On March 15, 1982 a representative of Pantley's Incorporated came before the Board of Appeal. He was requesting that secondary struc- tural members be omitted from the application of -fireproofing mate-. rial. At that time it was the opinion of the board that all posts, columns and other structural members must be protected by either an approved spray or that they*be protected with sheetrock. It is my observation that the protection that was applied in 1982 has deteriorated to the point that it is no longer effective. It appears that the coating has been adversely effected by mechanical as well as environmental conditions. Because of the current condi- tion of the protection and the certainty that similar protection will similarly deteriorate, I recommend that the second option required by the Board of Appeals be enforced, and further that all structural members be protected as directed in the Uniform Building Chapter 43. GLM:be CITY OF E O M O N O S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR CITY ATTORNEY November 12, 1984 Mr. Peter Hahn Community Services Director City of Edmonds Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Liability of the City and the Building Official for Negligence in Failure to Enforce Determined Violations Dear Mr. Hahn: I am in receipt of a memo from Harold Reeves, Building Official to Mayor Naughten regarding the Regency Building safety problems. Attached to that letter is a memo from Hal Reeves indicating your request for an opinion regarding the liability of the City and the Building Official. This liability would be defined as our liability for a failure to address noted building code violations. The State of Washington has joined the national trend of abrogating sovereign immunity and has done so both by case law and statute. Chapter 4.96 RCW. This abrogation of sovereign immunity is applicable to tortious actions of the City. As a general premise the negligent performance of a governmental or discretionary police power duty enacted for the public at large imposes no liability on the part of a municipality runni.ng to individual members of the public. This general rule was ^dis- cussed and a specific exception created in the leading Washington case of Campbell v. Bellevue, 85 Wn.2d 1, 530 P.2d 234 (1975). This Washington state supreme court decision is instructive not only for the general law that it lays down but its application of that -law to a set of facts very similar -to that which we are discussing. In the Campbell case the Bellevue building inspector was summoned to examine an electrical defect. He inspected the situation, noted the violation of the electri- cal code and took certain actions. When he had finished he assured the occupants of the home that the situation had been corrected. It had not, resulting in the death by electricution of an individual. The City of Bellevue was held to be liable. The Campbell exception basically discusses a situation in which the building inspector was alerted to and knew of a defect ,Mr. Peter Hahn November 12, 1984 Page 2 in violation of the City's ordinances. Despite that knowledge the inspector failed to comply with provisions of the code which require that he sever or disconnect the lighting system until it was brought into compliance with the electrical code require- ments. Such requirements were held by the court to be . . not only designed for the protection of the general public, but more particularly for the benefit of those persons or class of persons residing within the ambit of the danger involved, a category into which the plaintiff and his neighbors readily fall. Accordingly, we find municipal liability." Ibid, page 13. As you can see, the exception created by the Campbell case to the City's general freedom from liability for the negligent performance of governmental acts fits your factual situation very closely. In this case the City has determined that the restaurant is currently in violation of occupancy load require- ments. It is my understanding from the information provided that the correct occupancy load for the third floor is 300 persons. The City knows and Mr. Pantley admits that he has a posted occupancy limit sign of 377 individuals and has fre- quently 400 people or more on that floor. It is my assumption that problems involving occupancy loading and the fire exits from buildings would fall into the Campbell cases category of a situation which involves "extreme danger". The requirements also are not designed for the protection of the general public but rather of specific restaurant patrons who would be relying upon the occupancy figures and the fire exits situated in the building. Another recent decision of the Supreme Court involving the City of Seattle established a right to recover against the City under circumstances almost identical to your case. In Halvorson v. Dahl, 89 Wn.2d 673, 574 P.2d 1190 (en bonc, 1978), the Wash gton Supreme Court reviewed a case in which a hotel burned killing several individuals. According to the court the city had been aware of code violations existing at the hotel for at least six years. The City was aware of the violation and had from time to time embarked upon programs of enforcement of the building, housing and safety codes, but had never followed through to force the owners of the hotel to bring the structure into compliance. The court found that the special duty discussed in the Campbell case existed with respect to the housing code of Seattle and that therefore occupants of the hotel could claim the special relationship required by Campbell in order to press suit. This case is almost identical to your own, and it is my belief therefore that the City will be liable for any injuries or deaths which would occur in the event of a fire at the restaurant. Mr. Peter Hahn November 12, 1984 Page 3 Based upon the information available to me and my reading of the Campbell and Seattle cases it is my belief that the City risks liability for the death or injury to any individual brought about because of a fire at the Regency Building. The information supplied indicates that the situation before us fits into the Campbell exception making the City liable for a failure to enforce the specific provisions of the fire code relating to the exits and the occupancy. I would differentiate.the other issues raised by Mr. Reeves's letter which seem of a more technical nature which the City might well be able to compromise. Again, the general rule is that the City has discretion in the enforcement of its police power and is not required to pursue each and every violation, but may attempt to make reasonable decisions regarding the exercise of that power. In the situation involving the loading and exiting, I recommend that you take whatever enforcement action is necessary to correct that situation. If the City for whatever reason chooses not to do so, it must be done with the awareness that there is a high probability that the City would be held liable in the event of a death or injury to any person due to fire. I am aware Mr. Pantley points to other occupancy loading problems which exist at other restaurants within Edmonds and which have gone uncorrected. If that is the case the Fire Marshal and the Building Official should move to ascertain whether such violations exist and to address them as well. In this case however, the City's own files indicate clear knowledge of violations. Because of the.duty and liability imposed by the Campbell exception, this situation should be addressed immediately. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY W. Scott S der WSS:jt March 23, 1988 MEMO TO: Dan Prinz Police Chief FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal SUBJECT: A NEW RESTAURANT AT 144 RAILROAD AVENUE FISH HOUSE CHARLIES I recommend that the liquor license be held in abeyance pending the application of a fire retardant coating to the structural steel mem- bers within the parking garage. This is an issue that directly effects the safety and health of everyone patronizing that establish- ment. GLM:be CITY OF E D M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR CITY ATTORNEY November 12, 1984 Mr. Peter Hahn Community Services Director City of Edmonds Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Liability of the City and the Building Official for Negligence in Failure to Enforce Determined Violations Dear Mr. Hahn: I am in receipt of a memo from Harold Reeves, Building Official to Mayor Naughten regarding the Regency Building safety problems. Attached to that letter is a memo from Hal Reeves indicating your request for an opinion regarding the liability of the City and the Building Official. This liability would be defined as our liability for a failure to address noted building code violations. The State of Washington has joined the national trend of abrogating sovereign immunity and has done so both by case law and statute. Chapter 4.96 RCW. This abrogation of sovereign immunity is applicable to tortious actions of the City. As a general premise the negligent performance of a governmental or discretionary police power duty enacted for the public at :large imposes no liability on the part of a municipality running to individual members of the public. This general rule was dis- cussed and a specific exception created in the leading Washington case of Campbell v. Bellevue, 85 Wn.2d 1, 530 P.2d 234 (1975). This Washington state supreme court decision is instructive not only for the general law that it lays down but its application of that -law to a set of facts very similar.to that which we are discussing. In the Campbell case the Bellevue building inspector was summoned to examine an electrical defect. He inspected the situation, noted the violation of the electri- cal code and took certain actions. When he had finished he assured the occupants of the home that the situation had been corrected. It had not, resulting in the death by electricution of an individual. The City of Bellevue was held to be liable. The Campbell exception basically discusses a situation in which the building inspector was alerted to and knew of a defect t c' ,Mr. Peter Hahn November 12, 1984 Page 2 in violation of the City's ordinances. Despite that knowledge the inspector failed to comply with provisions of the code which require that he sever or disconnect the lighting system until it was brought into compliance with the electrical code require- ments. Such requirements were held by the court to be . . not only designed for the protection of the general public, but more particularly for the benefit of those persons or class of persons residing within the ambit of the danger involved, a category into which the plaintiff and his neighbors readily fall. Accordingly, we find municipal liability." Ibid, page 13. As you can see, the exception created by the Campbell case to the City's general freedom from liability for the negligent performance of governmental acts fits your factual situation very closely. In this case the City has determined that the restaurant is currently in violation of occupancy load require- ments. It is my understanding from the information provided that the correct occupancy load for the third floor is 300 persons. The City knows and Mr. Pantley admits that he has a posted occupancy limit sign of 377 individuals and has fre- quently 400 people or more on that floor. It is my assumption that problems involving occupancy loading and the fire exits from buildings would fall into the Campbell cases category of a situation which involves "extreme danger". The requirements also are not designed for the protection of the general public but rather of specific restaurant patrons who would be relying upon the occupancy figures and the fire exits situated in the building. Another recent decision of the Supreme Court involving the City of Seattle established a right to recover against the City under circumstances almost identical to your case. In Halvorson v. Dahl, 89 Wn.2d 673, 574 P.2d 1190 (en bonc, 1978), the Washington Supreme Court reviewed a case in which a hotel burned killing several individuals. According to the court the city had been aware of code violations existing at the hotel for at least six years. The City was aware of the violation and had from time to time embarked upon programs of enforcement of the building, housing and safety codes, but had never followed through to force the owners of the hotel to bring the structure into compliance. The court found that the special duty discussed in the Campbell case existed with respect to the housing code of Seattle and that therefore occupants of the hotel could claim the special relationship required by Campbell in order to press suit. This case is almost identical to your own, and it is my belief therefore that the City will be liable for any injuries or deaths which would occur in the event of a fire at the restaurant. Mr. Peter Hahn November 12, 1984 Page 3 Based upon the information available to me and my reading of the Campbell and Seattle cases it is my belief that the City risks liability for the death or injury to any individual brought about because of a fire at the Regency Building. The information supplied indicates that the situation before us fits into the Campbell exception making the City liable for a failure to enforce the specific provisions of the fire code relating to the exits and the occupancy. I would differentiate. the other issues raised by Mr. Reeves's letter which seem of a more technical nature which the City might well be able to compromise. Again, the general rule is that the City has discretion in the enforcement of its police power and is not required to pursue each and every violation, but may attempt to make reasonable decisions regarding the exercise of that power. In the situation involving the loading and exiting, I recommend that you take whatever enforcement action is necessary to correct that situation. If the City for whatever reason chooses not to do so, it must be done with the awareness that there is a high probability that the City would be held liable in the event of a death or injury to any person due to fire. I am aware Mr. Pantley points to other occupancy loading problems which exist at other restaurants within Edmonds and which have gone uncorrected. If that is the case the Fire Marshal and the Building Official should move to ascertain whether such violations exist and to address them as well. In this case however, the City's own files indicate clear knowledge of violations. Because of the duty and liability imposed by the Campbell exception, this situation should be addressed immediately. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY W. Scott S der WSS:jt LE October 24, 1984 MEMO TO: Mayor Naughten FROM: Harold Reeves Building Official SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE REGENCY BUILDING SAFETY PROBLEMS Despite our efforts to obtain compliance with the City's life safety codes, Mr. Pantley continues to operate the Regency Building at 144 Railroad Avenue with occupancy and exiting code violations which threaten the safety of the public. The following is my analysis of the current situation. The plans were submitted and approved for one hour fire resistive. construction between the parking garage (B-1 occupancy) and the restaurant (A-2.1 occupancy). However, I am in receipt of a recent opinion by the International Conference of Building Officials which holds that the required separation should be 3 hour instead of one hour. To make up the difference would require the addition of more fireproofing to the structural steel and the installation of a 3 hour fire door assembly. One hour construction was provided but there is no fire door at all between the parking garage and the 1st floor corridor serving exit Tl from the restaurant. This is a great hazard to the restaurant occupants. Section 3303 and 3318 of the UBC require that th.e A-2.1 restaurant have a main exit capable of accomodating 1/2 the total occupant load. Thus, the existing exits for the building would limit the total number on the third floor to 300. This is the limit stated on Mr. Pantley's Certificate of Occupancy, yet he has posted a load limit sign of 377 and states that he has 400 or more people at times on the third floor. Other code violations exist also. Restaurant exit #2 dumps into the parking garage. Plans called for a walkway (never installed), but the code would require a fire resistive corridor to the public way. The first floor lease space appeared originally to be designed for offices but was changed to retail use. The tenants use the fire resistive exit corridor as a mall and prop open the fire doors. If these doors must be open, they should be on smoke detector actuated automatic closure devices. The City Attorney feels that the City has a great liability exposure in this matter. It is my recommendation that efforts be coordinated through the attorney's office to secure compliance with the code as soon as possible. HR/cr CITY OF E D M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 BUILDING DIVISION August 24, 1984 Mr. Robert Pantley 51 W. Dayton St. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Pantley: It is indeed unfortunate that you cancelled for the second time our meeting relating to life safety code violations in your building at 144 Railroad Avenue. You have, however, been verbally informed of the problems. To confirm our August 14, 1984 conversation, the first floor parking garage is required to have a 1 hour fire.resistive occupancy separation from the offices, shops, and restaurant (UBC 104 d). All openings in such separations shall be protected by fire assemblies having a 1 hour fire protective rating (UBC 503 c). The existing aluminum and glass "store front" door does not comply. Required fireproofing of structural members in the garage is deteriorating and must be maintained to insure 1 hour fire resistive integrity (UBC 104 d). Tenants on the first floor continue to prop open their entry doors, which are to remain closed to protect the fire resistivity of the cooridor, which is a part of the re- quired exit for those on the floors above (UBC 104, 3305). You continue to use the south portion of the third floor as a banquet facility without minimum exiting as required by UBC 33. By letter dated July 1.8, 1984, you were told that this use must cease immediately until proper exiting is provided. The combination of these code violations is creating a serious threat to the safety and welfare of the occupants of your building. We have been, and continue to be, receptive to meeting with you. How- ever, please understand that the City has an obligation.to our citizens to insure conformance to State mandated fire and building codes, and this will require a firm committment on your part. We are asking for your full cooperation in resolving this matter, to avoid legal proceedings. Please contact the Building Division within three (3) days of this letter. Harold Reeves Building Official HR/tq cc: file i t CITY OF E O M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250 51h AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 BUILDING DIVISION July 18, 1984 Bruno F. Weiz Director of Operations 51 West Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Weiz, RE: THE REGENCY BUILDING @ 144 RAILROAD AVENUE It has recently come to the City's attention that the southern- most space located on the third floor is being used as a banquet facility. This is a much denser use than was originally approved, and is a violation of Chapter 33 of the UBC as adopted by the City. You must immediately discontinue use of the south, third floor area as a banquet or assembly room. You may apply for a permit to remodel and upgrade the exiting to handle assembly use. Your application.should include plans and specifications showing compliance with the _1982 UBC. Your architect may contact this office for specific requirements and recommendations. a'A o-i Harold Reeves Building Official Gary M as Fire Marshal July 3, 1984 Bruno F. Weiz Director of Operations 51 West Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Weiz, RE: THE REGENCY BUILDING @ 144 RAILROAD AVENUE It has recently come to the City's attention that the southern- most space located on the third floor is being used as a banquet facility. This is a much denser use than was originally approved and additional Life Safety items must be addressed. The following list is based on U.B.C. Table 33A, Assembly Areas, Concentrated Use (without fixed seats). Occupant load is 7 square feet per occupant based on 2,120 gross square feet allows a maximum occupant load of 302 people. 1. Remove Door #80 2. Provide a rated wall at Grid #9A-G - this will isolate the storage area from the exit corridor. 3. Provide panic hardware for Door #81. 4. Provide a sign (not an exit) on the door adjacent to the service elevator. 5. Provide an approved exit door with panic hardware at Grid #2 - C to D . 6. Provide an approved exit door with panic hardware at Grid #14.3 - A to C. 7. Provide exit signs and emergency lighting. 8. Provide one additional fire extinguisher for this space. 9. Provide an approved exit stair from the deck - third floor deck to second floor deck. 10. Provide an approved exit stair from the second floor deck to grade level between Grid # 23, 25 and Z, AA. April 29, 1982 MEMO TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Gary L. McComas Fire Marshal ZeGs NcL� SUBJECT: SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT THE PDM BUILDING The sprinkler system has been completed and complies with Section 13 of the National Fire Code. The building is com- pletely sprinklered with the exception of the decks on the second and third floors. GLM:be BOARD OF APPEALS March 15, 1982 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Allan Albers at 7:45 p.m. in the Planning Department Conference Room. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Allan Albers Walt Payne Hal Reeves, Building Official Larry Trent Sam Ewing Gary McComas, Fire Marshal Paul Nolan Cindy Noack, Recording Secretary Jack Whiteley MINUTES MR. NOLAN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. TRENT, TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 18, 1982 MEETIMG MINUTES AS WRITTEN.- MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Albers asked the members if they received and reviewed the information sent on the revisions to the Fire Code. Those members present stated they had and suggested that the item be on next meeting's agenda. AGENDA BA-3-82 Alternate method of fireproofing for structural steel in parking area on first level of building at 144 Railroad Avenue. Mr. Albers read the letter from Kirk Black of Pantley's, Inc. requesting an alternate method of fireproofing the steel columns, beams, and girders in the covered parking area. Mr. Reeves asked Mr. Whiteley if the building would still stand up if fireproofing of the trusses was omitted as requested. Mr. Whiteley responded that the building might if the main columns and frames were fireproofed but the trusses would buckle and the floors will come down. Mr. Reeves stated that a sprinkler system is not required in this building per the Uniform Building Code. A sprinkler system allows for area increases and increase in the number of stories allowed but it is not a substitution for occupancy separation. The situation at the above building is a parking garage and commercial habital space above it and the code requires a 1-hour occupancy separation, and the sprinklers in this case are not a substitution. Mr. Albers asked if the board could make a recommendation on this item without the applicant present. Mr. Reeves stated that the City Attorney advised that the board could, the applicant is not required to show at the meeting. The board asked what the floor area is in the building and Mr. Reeves stated that the first floor has 4,900 sq. ft. of occupied space and the rest is parking, the second .floor has 12,580 sq. ft. of occupied space and the third floor has 11,166 occupied space and extra decking. The restaurant comprises of about 7,000 sq. ft. on the third floor. The basic allowable for Type V-1-hour construction is 14,000 sq. ft. plus area increases are allowed for distance from property lines and in this case there is a street on one side and water on the other. They meet the allowable area and are not required to have sprinkler system. Mr. Reeves stated that it is the applicant'sidea that if the columns and main members where fireproofed, the sprinkler system would allow for the secondary members to be unprotected. BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES March 15, 1982 Page 2 Mr. McComas stated that the building is to be Type V-1-hour construction and if you don't apply anything to the steel it is not 1-hour construction. The original plan for the parking area was to have a drop ceiling which would be 1-hour rated. Then the plan was changed to spray all the steel members. Mr. McComas said he was satisfied that the spraying would give the 1-hour cover to everything that was sprayed but now they do not want to do either of the plans and he felt this alternate proposal should be denied and they should be forced to spray all the structural members or apply sheetrock. Mr. Albers stated that he could see their problem with spraying the trusses that it would affect the sprinkler system, but if the sprinkler heads were lowered below the trusses then he couldn't see any problem with spraying .the trusses. It was the board's opinion that the area in question should be satisfactorily sprayed or sheetrocked. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE REQUEST SINCE IT DOES NOT MEET THE 1-HOUR FIRE RATING. ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE EITHER SPRAYED, SHEETROCKED OR SOME OTHER FIREPROOFING METHOD. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Trent, Mr. Whiteley, Mr. Nolan voted yes, Mr. Albers voted no. MR. TRENT MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ALBERS TO DENY THE APPLICATION REQUEST ON THE BASIS THAT,IT DOES NOT MEET BUILDING CODE OR FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS AND ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS SHOULD BE PROTECTED. MOTION CARRIED. MR. WHITELEY MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. NOLAN TO RE-ELECT ALAN ALBERS AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. MOTION CARRIED. There was no further business to come before the board and the meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. I ST FL00 R DECK 210 212 206 � 214 216 204 218 �02 LO 22e. E BLD LOBBY OFFICE 203 205 123l 207 209 229 211 L 227 t lEl 213 f217 1219 1 � 225 215 I 221 � 223 144 RAILROAD AVE. Sueal Mom& ewd Addnsc REGENCY BUILDING M«.* .1 ceawy of uceNecy DECK 2 N D FLOOR r _� CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (205) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT July 1, 1981 Robert R. Pantl ey • Pantley's on Edmonds Bay 51 West Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 HARVE H. HARRISON R E C E14AMA D JUL 1981 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. Subject: Address Change for THE REGENCY on Edmonds Bay Building. The Building Division will now list the address for THE REGENCY as 144 Railroad Avenue instead of "138 Railroad Avenue" per your request. We will notify other city departments and it shall be your responsibility to notify all other concerned parties. Harold Reeves Building Official HR/cn cc: Utility b.i.11ing Fire Department - Police Department MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Police Department Fire Department Building Division REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED JUL 11 1981 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT„ The Building Division has received a request to change the following address. Please indicate below your approval or disapproval on the change of this address. 13 21 /RWAQ20' 4y,,0. to 1JIV 1P0i-4 ad z4ve- old addr ss —'new add ess Police Department: Approval Fire Department: gna D)pproval Approval V Disapproval Signa ure (Please return to the Building Division when completed.) EBD 6-81 CITY OF E D M O N D S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT January 18, 1982 Mr. Robert Pantley 51 West Dayton Edmonds, WA 98020 SUBJECT: Emergency Lighting Requirements for PDM Building Dear Bob, I have been questioned about the requirements for emer- gency lighting in your new building. I hope that the follow- ing will help clarify the code requirements. The following are direct excerpts from the Life -Safety Code. 8-2.9 Emergency Lighting - All places of assembly and their means of egress shall be.provided with emergency lighting in accordance with Section 5-9. 5-9.21 Emergency lighting facilities shall be arranged to maintain the specified degree of illumination throughout the means of egress, but not less than one footcandle for a period of lZ hours in the event of failure of the normal lighting. 5-9.2.3 An emergency lighting system shall be so ar- ranged as to provide the required illumination auto- matically in the event of any failure of public util- ity or other outside electrical power supply, opening of a circuit breaker or fuse, or any manual act(s) including accidental opening of a switch controlling normal lighting facilities. 26-2.9.1 Emergency lighting in accordance with Sec- tion 5-9 shall be required in any business occupancy building where: a.. The building is two or more stories in height above the level of exit discharge. If you should have any questions regarding this, please January 18, 1982 Mr. Robert Pantley Page 2 contact my office at 775-2525, extension 233, between the hours of 8 : 00 a.m. and 5 : 00 p.m. Sincerely, AC Garyt McComas Fire Marshall GIII : be CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT December 22, 1981 Viking Automatic Sprinkler Company Attn: Nick Adskim 3434 First Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134 Dear Mr. Adskim: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR SUBJECT: SPRINKLER PLAN REVIEW FOR THE PDM BUILDING, 138 RAILROAD AVENUE, EDMONDS, WA 98020 After review of the proposed plans, we have the following additional requirements: 1. Provide construction details, plot plan, and cross section on plan submittals. 2. Install earthquake sway bracing at each flexible coupling in horizontal piping and secure bracing to steel structure with thru bolts. 3. Sprinkler south exterior overhang on the ground floor level, elevator shaft at the top and bottom, and blind concealed spaces which contain combustible materials and/or motorized mechanical equipment. 4. All welded fittings to be listed by UL for fire service. S. Use 2120 heads in blind roof spaces. If you should have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact this office by calling 775-2525, Ext. 233, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Gary Lam' McComas Fire Marshal GLM:sr CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT December 221, 1981 Mr. Lloyd Black, Project Engineer 1411-7th Place South Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Black: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR SUBJECT: INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS FOR THE NEW BUILDING AT 138 RAILROAD AVENUE IN EDMONDS .In order to avoid any confusion about flame spread ratings on the interior finish materials, here are the Life Safety Code requirements: Section 6-5 All exits shall be Class A flame spread rated, all access to exits shall be Class A or B, and all other spaces shall be Class A, B, or C. Prior to the installation of any interior finish material, documentation shall be pro- vided to the Building Department showing the flame spread rating. If you should have any questions concerning this, please con- tact this office by calling 7.75-2525, Ext. 233, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Gary�McComas Fire Marshal GLM:sr cc: Hal Reeves, Building Official