The URL can be used to link to this page

15615 75TH PL W (2).PDF111111111111 6043 15615 75TH PL W ADDRESS: _ 1 //% / . / �l� 4ie TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: •1 I CRITICAL AREAS: �" l DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver �tudy Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: I/-'t7`1/I `7 , V"V V- DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST SCALED PLOT PLAN SEWER LID FEE SHORT PLAT SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: 4�7o9:% SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LID #: Z`o LOT: BLOCK: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc CITY of EDM6NDS SfE S�EE R_PERMIT f. For Inspection Call 771-3202 ERMIT N0. our FILE - YNNWQOD LINE Address of Constructicon: /.5t9 i5 ` %S+ PL . tt) Property Legal Description (Include all easements): PUBLIC WORKS Owner and/or Builder: kye_ tewlGL Contractor & License .No: LLA Single Family Residence 1� Multi -Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No e Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One - Call -Center (1-800-424-5-555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify that I have read and shall comply with the items listed on the back. . Date Permit Fee: 3D 00 Issued By: Trunk Charge: Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: �-21O-aS Date Initial o, Rejected: C) Reason Date Initial Ln ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** a� White Copy - File Green Copy-.Inspecto.r Buff Copy - Applicant z z uw IE 04 11 .1 In 10 M- I- LO LO I'D LO 75 TH PL.W. N 0 R-r-" § PLANNING DATA NAME: DATE: SITE A RESS: l PLAN CHK#: 0�9 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: e / No MAP PAGE: Sol. CORNER LOT: RS- FLAG LOT: es No ZONING: O L/ , CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: ❑. Conditional Waiver 1�� f e- SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area. site within 200 R of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) Exempt 1/- q t -IIq pe,,M-ri i�vad Steccif. SETBACKS: Reaulred Setbacks: / Street: `i - 5 Left Side: 3S ldRight Side: 3510 Rear. ° Actual Setbacks: ?I `i Street: 0-61 Left Side: Right Side: V Rear: 3 Street map checked for additional setback required? Tes-"h No / DNA ❑ DETACHED STRUCTURES: ❑ ROCKERIES: ❑ FENCESIrRELLISES: ❑ BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: / ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: - PARKING: Required:_2- Actual: LOT AREA: 7 6L00 L ` Caalculaati/ons• 7d - �• 6 01 BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point: �� m e T&- Datum Elevation: t o o 11 Maximum Allowed: a S Actual Height: 0 ' "',e L 4 t T tU� A.D.U. CREATED?: SUBDIVISION: N LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATIOV ISSUED: es / No NewBPPlanningDataForm.DOC CA FILE NO. Oitical Areas ChecklisiR -------------------------------------------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location: 6 /� 7Sr �/ j/�,.,.,;.,,�< <•%,6 2. Property Tax Account Number: 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):y-60 s Q IT 4. Is this site currently developed? _Ryes; no. If yes; how is site developed? S S6 S Q 4 i h 005E L- ; -)-L, 5 n� l p Ua✓/r J t 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. X— Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than l 5% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: /,) 0x/E ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: iV Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? `-- 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year- round? Flows are seasonal? — (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urn landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: F DET]MMINATION, �� STUDY REQUIREb WAIVER Reviewed by: Planner 11q_chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). DEVELOPMENT SERVICES An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the ' subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). OFwner/Applicant: JC. o?r 1-7/A✓7SL-Al Name -2s N 1.1111 Street Address City State Zip N25-) 2t3 - 2-08.3 Telephone Signature Applicant Representative: Name Street Address City State Zip Telephone Signature Date Date =eception\janakaddoc (over) Dennis M. Bruce, M.S.C.E., M.B.A. June 1, 1999 Tiffany and Scott Hansen 15615 - 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer RECEIVED -- JUN 15 1999 DEVELOPMENT CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Hansen Addition Project 1:561e5=-75th Place=West, Edmonds, Washington This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Hansen property at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to homeowner concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. • Location map • Topographic survey of Hansen property by A.F.M. Industries, Inc., dated April 20, 1999 • Proposed house addition plans by Phil King Designs • Photographs by D. Bruce, P.E. BACKGROUND: The existing Hansen residence at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington, revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No settlement, no shifting, no foundation movement, no soil creep, nor any erosional degradation were observed. It is understood that Tiffany and Scott Hansen intend to construct an addition to the rear (easterly) of their existing house. It is understood that this addition will consist of a two -car garage at grade level, with a bonus playroom above. The dimensions of this addition are approximately twenty-three foot (23') wide by twenty-. five foot (25') deep (see plans). Currently, the Hansen rear yard consists of a lawn portion, existing wooden deck portion, and a rear sloped area with hot tub and deck (see photographs). The proposed addition will essentially occupy the house deck zone and extend easterly past the base rockery. The addition will not approach the upper deck and hot tub area. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 • 11 Hansen Page two The extreme rear (easterly) portions of the Hansen property encompass the steep slope portions of the region. The slope exists at an approximate forty percent (40%) grade. The slope contains mature stable trees, with dense brush (see photographs). No evidence of any geotechnical distress, slides, nor erosional degradation was observed immediately above and behind the Hansen property. This engineer understands that a localized surficial slide has occurred one to two properties to the north, and is a direct result of up slope bad drainage practices. It is understood that the localized slide to the north is currently undergoing stabilization and drainage improvements. As stated in the 1979 Roger Lowe Associates, Inc., report, drainage and ground water control are the best practices for landslide risk reduction. This engineer concurs. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, power hand auger test holes were dug under this engineer's observation on May 22, 1999. Two test holes were dug to seven foot (7') depths (see photographs and site plan for locations). Test Hole No. 1 was dug at the approximate south foundation line of the proposed addition, approximately twelve feet (12') east of the existing house. Test Hole No. 2 was dug approximately ten feet (10') south of the hot tub deck on the relatively level soil bench. Both test holes revealed similar subsurface conditions, namely: 0" to 6" Organics, roots, and organic silt 6" to approx. 3.5' Brown sand, relatively clean, moderately dense 3.5' to 4.5Increasingly dense sand with cobbles 4.5' to 7' (bottom of hole) Very dense silt and silty sand with cobbles No.water was encountered in either of the test holes. Both test holes remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. This engineer conducted a visual examination of the slope above the Hansen property. A small historic "cave" (?) zone was observed. It is understood that this "cave" was used for historic bootleg storage purposes. This "cave" was approximately three foot (3') high by approximately three foot (3') deep along the face of the bluff slope. The "cave" revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress. Additionally, this "cave" zone allowed further verification of the dense sandy silt and gravel soils present. This engineer did observe a mature fir tree growing immediately above the • • Hansen Page three "cave" zone, and made recommendations for either significant topping or total tree removal to eliminate the possibility of falling, given the proximity to the "cave" zone with tree roots. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the proposed Hansen house addition at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, is geotechnically approved in accordance with the proposed Phil King designs, subject to the following conditions: • Standard reinforced and continuous spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspection by this engineer rip i rto any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is • • Hansen Page four anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils Robinson Homes, Inc. Page four or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the- slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following • • Hansen Page five recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f.. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per. cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should 0 Hansen Page six contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four-(4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No ground water was observed in either of the test borings during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use E • Hansen Page seven of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Hansen Page eight Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident at the Hansen residence and property. Surface water flows generally westerly into the existing City of Edmonds street right-of- way storm water system. Compliance with standard storm water control methods in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements are geotechnically acceptable. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. • E Hansen Page nine INSPECTION: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts. • Foundation subgrade verification • Retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement • Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The proposed Hansen residence addition at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, Washington, is geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspection during construction. The plans and specifications for the proposed Hansen addition at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use,' and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. LANDSLIDE HAZARD: In this engineer's opinion, the probability of earth movement on the Hansen property within a period of twenty-five years is less than ten percent (10%). Thus, according to City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 2661, the lot and proposed addition are suitable for residential use. The key to minimizing landslide events is proper drainage control. It is essential that the City of Edmonds properly enforce up slope storm water practices regarding the properties to the east of the Hansen residence. C� J r: Hansen Page ten The risk of landslide cannot be totally eliminated, and property owners knowingly assume all residual risks. The geotechnical recommendations and declarations associated with the Hansen project do not constitute a warranty, either express or implied, against loss or damage to persons or property. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. EXPIRES 12/23/ DMB:vIb Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer trrr3 M� (tr �' i � Yt �� • � '.i r E';k r ,�b..t�y.� � •r�' ','nr �r t � `�,�9��" r � e � i°,' ; r}� ��ii� •� .. -' � •_..ice.... _...�'.Ql+r�}'We.+f _ �-. ..e.-. ...; ,r� ��7.`'414 �.-{�i�,.le «� d--Y-�'tfi'r�ti r ?!rf n�f� T's?• X" :i � �- < �, z/ r� f .y�^�ir1�� 1T}� /�yrt�+',�;";',(?"�}��`� f, `} �A'�: f1 � t'�' •• - � ,'t%� � '•D r�'°'��!r2��T� Ltr' "i }� �'i `q�,�)�,7i� �,i�� ' I ✓ .�; _ ��. �,�,`,. r � 1= •' aJ•t�rF, �C-!{r't�,� M � .tj¢;5rd'' 1t' ��-�;,? �°2 )1�,str.J'' r. � 3 •i ' f ' � �R .� r2 •J' . t 1 , i LLLTTTT p �j"• , r, �i. r yZl ti � 'L; r�• ,M r' -j-� rim• 4 AC' .f .�• i •�• 1r•1�� .�t'7 �.il Y�•� �7 5fif� 1�1r':rP f' _# t .•r'rx .,.n�,f :'�Y+ '�' F �.�r�fijfi; ��:r4��rl,'f±. .t%- 'r✓�yi•'� �b'�'F . i II rt � , • � tVft Mk � �.+.%!a` ' �d y i:. .��? ice.: - ��•:`_±�%fri.��•:"��. Fj vn 3 ... •..' � - '•4 h a !�; a" � '.:fry Po ,. rt -40,•y .- q ri9LJ�+. a a ly / x. �a wR.• 1f -gn%7, z ..+: .ti. � 1 , � .� I,Y .1, r. j:}K fti�.,1 v�jl, �'�t.'A•"~ �n � Y li ,� q.. F`II ,�• ,ram JJa, � ...�,>� � � '�.. s •' ,�, t .' �"• 331� . pit l i .. ; k � Y i� �� rf^".' `i`"5+is�" 4- � ,�t�''"i''r r1, ��,r� � i �• r r r 1 r 1�r� f cj_ ��1 'T•. 7 '• r �7; .'1j��riJ r/ �` �� :J 4h Ix. "tl•1t �1�1 , i t t � � )��.. ( �f• , v� r .' 1 � : �� "T � •t i i 1181��R 1 , pt •r1 _ram J}.4 iry,� �..: •` � !%. .1f fnrrl 7 �. f �. . AT ,�f'�j( ,ZL/, `pry •lei 1�%`�'� ,"+. ••`' �.t. 1•.' as 4(r,'P� - D�,',N } t •F,.""' �, ':t`.,r d ' C✓T'. v ' •� t..?s �.*��+U�fY�j•,c:s{{i'��s7r'•jL r� � '{y �'' i - r 1�' Iti li.'� �• �h:t�.. 1 r � rl�A ,,�. �r V' �-0fiY '� l''rr�..4': J �j��ja ��:'�I..i �_esm �,��—„, �f'�� y^:A„�5 1' \�� -• d' V/ i i J ,J-m ilt, ('" N •��'� �,�.��t}ti �q � 7 jn - (Jr t� �5 l� ' r i7��2 e u 1ws: tei;. vf� jam'` l �r' s� 50. rvt I I Y Ty`r ��I+tyii 1 Jam' 1 1 _I �1 •w�r4fi : 1 r', ��. r•� lT f {1''�iir �\a.`�y��i .... : r, . �. CASCAE>ETESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS 12919 N.E 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND.WASHINGTON 98034 (425) 823-9800 ka-ii EVERETT (42S) 259-0817 FIELD REPORT TO: f� [�V R F 4w► Y 2004 NT SERVICES CTR• i ATTN THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: PREVIOUS 53641 REPORT No. No. GATE CERT. NO- P OJECT E-u-G�- LOCATION v� :C3 rf WOW BLDG. PERMIT NO. R G -U d WEATHER TEMP. LAT �Q AM AT PM NGINEER 'ARCHtrECT C=CTOR p Y G aw 4 7 4/6 x Se cT,1520 TEST RESULTS APPLY ONLY TO THE ITEMS HEREIN TESTED. THIS REPORT SHALL NOT INSPECTOR(S). NAME(S PRINTED BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITH- OUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. INSPECTOR SIGNATURE REVISED flag 1 SIGNED BY •) RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 COPY ON F:'.r I THE COU'iV AUDITOR'S t F6-ICE )/18/1999 11:11 AM Snohomish 1( OoO6 RECORDED county P. COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: `-'I vL-, "I Grantor(s): (1) (2) !��' 'a�� Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec Twn Rng Qtr OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) "7' 0Q0 _Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY:ff-- DATE: 10114 PAGE I OF Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: k APPRQkTD FOR RECMDIN�G: BY: DATE: M( PAG OF _G_ 1. Description of Subject Prop. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of APPROVED FOR RECORDING: PA ,_J-�--DATE: �Cl { ' �► PAGE OF the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Fold Harmless The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or •> APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE: PAGE OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director �(S/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. APPRO D FOR RECORDING: BY: LW DATE: 10 q PAGE OF DONE this /r� day of & ,1994. -1) S. g0 ��♦♦`FDA•••• k �.'OSION iyJ1: 'bVBIIG �'O: O �i O •••..•• ♦N STATE OF WASHINGTON ) f; //�Cr ) COUNTY OF ) ss: OWNER(S B / Y• By: UA I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �L4TT y NaA166A1� F 1Fi W1V y /-)41VSCnO signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 9 / day of PUBLIC My commission expires: L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT 199 q. 2//a-/o1 APPR VED FOR RECORDING: B :: DATE: tg PAGE OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF �i/l✓C� ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that S&)r7- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. . DATED this %61 day of 1, 6OSSI0H'.�l`�i NOT, 01 -4. q �. L 0 eL►C �? L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT My commission expires: SnoTiomish County Office of the Assessor. Real Property Summary Parcel: 51310000240102 Sit" Address: 15615 75TH PL W' Size: 0.17 Acres or Land Located On: EDMONDS, WA 98026 TCA: 00217 Legal: MEADOWDALE BEACH BLK 000 D-01 - BEG SW COR TH PTN TR 24 LY E OF CO. RD TH N ALG E LN CO RD 82FT TO TPB TH CONT NLY ALG SD RD 60FT TH ELY PLL TO S BDY SD TR 12DFT TH SLY PLL TO CO RD 60FT TH WLY PLL TO S BDY TR 12OFT TO TPB Parties: Role Name & Address Owner HANSEN SCOTT & TIFFANY 15615 75TH PL W EDMONDS, WA 98026 . Taxpayer HANSEN SCOTT & TIFFANY 15615 75TH PL W EDMONDS, WA 98026 Property Values Assessed New . Market Tax Year Land Improvements Construction Total Land Improvements Total 1999 $155,500.00 $56,100.00 0 $211,600.00 I $155,500.00 $56,100.00 $211,600.00 Run: 101181199911:03:46 AM ASCO037 Page 1 Lyle Chrisman City of Edmonds Engineering Dept. APR 1 1 2000 1 t1 ii �ltii"► �, Dear Lyle, At your request, I am submitting this letter acknowledging the completion of the catch basin installation as required by the city of Edmonds on our property located at: 15615 75th Place West- Edmonds Wa.,98026. We have established a frozen funds account at U.S Bank in Edmonds to cover the costs of this installation. I am requesting that you release the funds back to me so payment can be issued to Bodine Construction as soon as possible. Thank -you for your timely response. Sincerel , Tiffany Hansen 4-1101 u- V7! LL! 17D7 11. JO J`�00'�'+O Df[UI,C ii-Il7C Cll Dennls M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer September 20, 1999 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Ray Miller, Director of Community Services Department Mr. James C. Walker, P.E., City Engineer , Iding Official Subject: Hansen Proposed Residence Addition 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds This engineering report presents additional geotechnical responses for the proposed Scott and Tiffany Hansen residence addition project at 15615 - 751h Place West, Edmonds, Washington. • Proposed Hansen addition plans by Phil King, Designer • Geotechnical evaluation report by D. Bruce, P.E., dated June 1, 1999 • Zipper -Zeman Associates review, dated July 22, 1999 • Additional geotechnical criteria report by D. Bruce, P.E., dated August 26, 1999 • Zipper -Zeman Associates, Supplement No. 1 report, dated September 8, 1999 • Photographs It is understood that the City of Edmonds still requires additional response for the proposed modest house addition for the Mr. and Mrs. Hansen residence at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds. The request for additional information is the result of a September 9, 1999 meeting with the following parties: Janine Graf and Don Fiene, P.E., of City of Edmonds Scott Hansen, Owner John Zipper, P.E., geotechnical consultant to City of Edmonds D. Bruce, P.E., geotechnical engineer for owner The September 8, 1999 Zipper -Zeman Associates Supplement No. 1 report to the City of Edmonds requests additional evaluation and conclusions for the risk of SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN B PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 09/22/1989 11:38 5468446 BRUCE rr�ut n� Hansen Property Page two debris flow. At the September 9, 1999 meeting, Mr. Zipper and this engineer agreed that it is reasonable that excessive mud flows generating from any slope problem are insignificant in terms of their existing or potential threat to the current Hansen residence and planned remodel. It appears, however, that disagreement exists between Mr. Zipper and this engineer regarding what realistic potential danger may exist from tree fall danger to the existing and proposed residence. This engineer has done geotechnical investigation with regard to the proposed addition foundation integrity, lateral soil pressures, and rear (easterly) slope stability. As previously discussed in both the June 1, 1999 and August 26, 1999 geotechnical reports, this engineer clearly declares ... "The probability of earth movement on the Hansen property within a period of 25 years is less than ten percent (10%)." It is understood that Mr. Zipper agrees with this engineer's declaration regarding the likelihood of less than ten percent. The disagreement exists regarding what type of earth movement (however less than 10%) might or should be mitigated. Additignal "Studies": It is unclear what additional "studies" are requested or required. It is not practical, certainly not cost-effective, and probably damaging to the existing slope to drill additional soil bore holes on the Hansen rear slope. No matter how many bore holes might be drilled, the resultant information would bear out what already exists. namely: One to three feet (1' - X) of sandy colluvial soil over dense, impervious, glaciated till. As previously stated, the mature trees on the eastern slope do assist in. soil stabilization. Some trees,do pose failing risks. These trees have. been identified, and topping / removal is underway. Homeowners agreed to this select tree topping / removal process. As previously discussed, the major risk to any significant slope disturbance relates to up slope uncontrolled storm water discharge. The burden of proper storm water control exists on the homeowner above. It is understood clearly that the upper property owner (Dr. Craig Summers) understands the importance of proper drainage control. It is understood that the current proper drainage control will be closely monitored and maintained in the future. Both Mr. and Mrs. Hansen and Dr. Summers are aware of this, are intelligent people, and intend to maintain proper drainage systems. 09/22/1999 11:38 5468446 BRUCE F'AVt b� Hansen Property Page three It is understood that Mr. Zippers fears of future avalanche or debris flow into a lower level bedroom zone. As discussed at the September 9, 1999 meeting, the addition project will consist of a garage (non -livable space). This engineer does not object to any deed restriction that might be placed declaring that the garage is a non - livable space. Additionally, the up slope wall (easterly) of the garage could be constructed three to five feet higher than final grade to act as a "catchment wall" to provide protection against erosional sloughing or the remote possibility of minor debris avalanche. It is understood that Mr. and Mrs. Hansen agree to this design modification for their proposed addition. Risks: As stated by this engineer, and agreed to in the September 9, 1999 meeting, the slope risks to the Hansen property are no more if the proposed addition is built than they are currently. These risks are no more than they have been for the numerous years the Hansens have occupied the existing house. The disagreement apparently exists over the seemingly lack of runout space for any potential debris flow, given the location of the new addition. As stated, this engineer is not concerned against a few cubic yards of eroded soil oozing into the Hansen's backyard. As previously stated, proper drainage control from the top -of -slope will greatly reduce / eliminate the likelihood of uncontrolled erosional sloughing. The Hansens have experienced no erosional sloughing nor any debris avalanche to date. The proposed rear garage "beefy" retaining wall / catchment wall will provide additional protection against the future remote possibility. It is clearly understood that the City of Edmonds currently has the so-called "Meadowdale Slide Area" process. This engineer totally agrees with the idea behind the process, namely, requiring qualified, experienced geotechnical professionals to assess property risks, assess proposed development projects, and make safe, good engineering recommendations for development. It is essential that the public be protected from their owitnaivete, poor contractors, or natural hazardous phenomenon. 09/22/1999 11:38 5468446 BRUCE HAVE 04 f Hansen Property Page four Currently, however, the so-called "Meadowdale Slide Area Process" appears to be causing excessive and unjustified over -review, over -analysis, lack of "who's responsible", paperwork, reports, time delays and confusion. This engineer understands that currently, the City of Edmonds consultants review projects in accordance with the legal / stated so-called "Meadowdale Slide Policy". It is further understood that no one in the City of Edmonds actually reviews the geotechnical reports with critical evaluation. This is unfortunate. Time and time again, this engineer has heard, "We're not geotechnical experts. You have to satisfy our consultants." This engineer has worked in the Puget Sound area, Alaska, and Oregon as a licensed, registered engineer for 27 years. Most jurisdictions evaluate their own consultant's work and reach their own independent conclusions. Obviously, some professional disagreement or different interpretations will exist. The question that seems begging with regard to the City of Edmonds is: Who makes the call? This engineer was most disappointed at the September 9, 1999 meeting when the City of Edmonds building official said nothing, offered no conclusions or interpretations, and let the consultant speak for the City of Edmonds. The City of Edmonds should take a clearer position on differences of technical expertise, Other jurisdictions do. The so-called "Meadowdale Slide Area Ordinance" is, de facto, clogging up the system, adding incredible delays and expense to projects. Can we ever "study enough" to guarantee 100% safety with regard to slope situations? No. Can we do sufficient study with practical engineering recommendations to assure a reasonable and minimal risk to development? Yes. The Hansen project is a small rear addition. This engineer has made clear geotechnical recommendations. Additional recommendations have been made in this report. No more studies, investigations, lab analysis, memos, reports, or meetings are necessary. 09/22/1999 11:38 5468446 13HUUL rNut n� Hansen Property Page five I have put my engineering seal and signature on the proposed Hansen project. I stand behind it. It is essential that this engineer perform on -site inspections during construction, along with a final certified report upon satisfactory completion. What more does the City of Edmonds (not their outside consultants) need or want? If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call, E'l LxvnREs 12/2311 `l M vb cc: M/M Hansen'-, 1 S_C� IQ - �� Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer FROM : D.Bruce, P.E. Engin PHONE NO. 206 546 8442 Oct. 03 1999 10:29PM P1 RECCIVED 0 DEv ENT SERVICES M Dennis S �P T. 3O M. Bruce, P.E. q Qf WOf ED OND& ' ( l 1 M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer -Is5 l �sj. S �L)S�Ec7 ��TECT �s�oJ C �S 17S- Y Au -rHoR.t'?,- Es T�� IA six P /�bhl"►'IorJ l P-oTC -rt' IUvML~R-ous' ��o�"�c>y• �CPO �e-rs sec PLAtis A �s-��oc� FSPO-s e7Tr. T�.O • As S+rA X�gv�-rro�, Apt C�err�l� �aHtpL��Troal • I Ns�FGTto� ��o�. �, Kgp0je7, /!ri � ofMAs.iftg,W� . ..G^ 11! SOILS FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 PHONE NO. : 206 546 8442 FROM : D. Bruce, P. E. Engin itceIvIK SEP 3 01999 nnis M. Bruce, P.E. a nnu►ENT SERVICE M.S.C.E., M.B. --0 CI-YY Suss£C7 - ENG1NE:P-rNG ? EDMou�s flE,J. SEOJ- p�v. R k Q.se j3 T R-oT C- C 7 A T 115-6 ts" Sep. 30 1999 01:22PM P1 Va s wr 2,,I, I q � � Geotechnical/Civil Engineer Lc0�107& A07"E�T/AL �oR -SMALL Loc/�l.r� �Nrl FAWP. 91S I(SC "S" 7rNE l_-- SukrACIAL -SI-o06141kd. �•(bFBQI S �VRLANCN� "� �RO1 LET/ N N� 7N� EAR C�A57�2LY1 WW G L DC THE tLlAAJSjrOJ So uOUe ric AG � A-da I710 � 1�1s . � CO ('A-r VJA LL- Al A CCoMod l4 -'F A Po7�N-r1�` d� 0� THE WA I- c, A TNs A or „IEnIs ��ow ALI,N� TNF L�NlT�LGY �PP�ov�� TNT T� kr-rAeot~t trs1eN �- Soli lNv�s-rrGA 01 , oC „F.R��-BeAkA / s �H�� oN �?CPFRI ENC G �ITtf N �YdIS or AOJ"owl'ue A91 huN r,k'Ou r SIMILAk SITul�7roNS. As �isc�ss�� , Ta a✓ �o-rso-�-r►At~ �o� dJA��IL ��e�ts . ccoHM�Nd A-rrou s To 1e15d�lov6 THE Sg L E c-r �ie�Es A N IVIfrN�G� UP SL'Op • STo�MU�ATE� A it £ E . S7f}T 7o MIN/Mt7£/Pt�v£NY .MAN_ Ml4D5 P�oBLEMs�1$: M• 8� 51�14LL 1; MINIKUNk -F i t - J �TJ A s �1 1740 CISIM �� 0,03C ,� EXIST . AND O l� I N IS H p o�s'�Fisrea�° �RA�'E �wk�CNEv�� 15 HtGNER-�1 b Pt f } 1614 EF S��NAL �ZyG PEt2- 'THIS E�GIe►1EI✓�S �%N JtT� ��SP�-�T10iJ.r, EXPIRE8 12W1 , SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN 6 PERMIT LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 FROM D.Bruce, P.E. Engin PHONE NO. fTY OF Lc Et�f�rlNu;c E.n&l eenna J 44� O)kje 3216 Wetmore Ave. Everett, WA 98201 (Q2S17s2 ` .... .AC-lb'jk5r UNbez'-0R.E-D .- SOIL 206 546 e442 Sep. 30 1999 01:23PM P2 1 P. 2i2fic12 Hale r.. Wage .No: of r ;• � � 1J 1 �SiT.3f1ID'•.En.. Y � _ ( ` •,' fir ,' . _�.._,�..� _.� _ _,. "� � • v/ cc � -- cIcrr ce w ct i �' • ° o w # Sm IS #4c�,16 O ' #K C.b 7 8'� 4 li 18 N� 10 1'r �1. ��Q1 i fbi �i /D.� TnTul 0 f'.^, Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. s IEP7 M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer Tn : (ft -T Y Sui3SEc7 ENGINEER r NG JPoduS5 1 - 7$-YI rAX rROM ? E�Mou�s DEv. SE�v. l�tv. CL'lv�' OCT -A D 99 t' F�4JSE,.i TKOT CT AT S� IS �S>� p p)Q'. ". �c DUNTER A►s 'Q(ScuSSEm THE RE�1o7E /dDt"�D�%/AL foR SMAIc.jocAc 1?4 " SuST�e u cT �e�A�,a� SLOUGNl�l1G C•cdF8�1 s AVRGA,4J �"/ �RoT Cam, L T/NEN/ t. E) . TNT ke (FASTrP-1,Y) WpGL or 7i-te hWlSeM C�A{� �-�A.�fTIoN l�S �E�"AJ RE. �}GSO FU��C IO Aj At A CATeN-IMON'7" WA LL • (SEE b�slGN� , TNIJ Fu�.e . R T,qo wA t c A eLoMOdp'rb- � Po7�NT//¢L dt� � f}epTL a�EFT or � fBt IS rtow , A IoNG THE J NTH OC' TKF �id�IT/oN . . ATTAeOrh tr�SIGN is 6Eo7��NNl�ALLY PP"Y" . TN >: a oN $o/L �IUV>✓S'7"IGA�/aNs. LYdIS of 4bX0jNIN4 ?poPF�e-nr--s AN.h 'Wl-rJ4 /IJ�MEI�O(�,r S/AAILIt�C SITuAT(ouS. As TwF J)OT£wTIAL lrop NATOP-AL tFfttlS ST�ONlO Roeemme;/IJAAT/Ous %o ArMOVg S� L E c-r AAAjuA6Er UP SI Ti2�Es AND PIeOPEdeL7' .oP� STo�Mv��TEee (tE RE - S714T'E T MtN/Mt7E/P1`"VOUT AAm- Mft�Dl: PkoBLEMs M. •�15 �8� . 5L-VJ A"f 10 JJ 4 c n TOP o � C'�TC kt M �d�T "� � S4ALL -9E M1NiKuI-1 -k '�� ANC A T MIOJ , oK a AQOVE EXIST. AND of� FINISN QFCImcrvva 4 '� GRALS (wl}%ct4 EvEP- 15 HIG+IER� d 1Z 1 �s } {F-- ssf ONAL LAG PER- THIS ON SITE EXPIRES 1 SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 aenL Dy: LIB pef- Lt III II NbOUl:la lCD, LIll:., JC LOU1l C, • rayc c Zi eJr Zeman Associates Inc. Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting City o dmonds Comm 'ty Services Department 250 — Avenue North Edmo s, Washington 98020 Attentiin: Ms. Jeannine Graf, Building Official Subjec Supplement #1 to July 22, 1999 Geotechnical Review Proposed Addition/Remodel of Hansen Residence 15615 — 75'h Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Nis. Graf: J-470 September 8, 1999 is letter presents our conclusions and recommendations concerning our geotechnical revie f building permit application documents for the referenced project. These services were reques with your letter of transmittal dated June 21, 1999. The plan review number for this projec is 99-177. This letter supplements our letter of July 22, 1999, by commenting on additi al information submitted by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. in a letter dated August 26, 1999. r July 22, 1999 letter summarizes the status of submittals required by the referenced ordin ce. In the latest letter, the geotechnical engineer notes that all of the items listed are submi d. Specific comments from our July 22, 1999 review regarding the details of each item were t, however, addressed. In order to concentrate on the "big picture" regarding this applic ion, we have summarized the current status of each submittal on an enclosure with this letter. e risk of debris avalanche, earth flow, debris fall, or mud flow is described in the submi ed report and supplemental letter only in general terms, based on the engineer's experi ce. We are not questioning the engineer's experience, but are of the opinion that the ordin ce clearly requires either a more detailed analysis of slope stability, or mitigation of risks posed y this slope, or both. A detailed analysis of the long term slope stability would require meas meet or evaluation of soil strengths, groundwater and surface water conditions, and other facto and calculation of numerical factors of safety or probabilistic evaluations of hazards. Off si conditions, including destabilizing effects of extreme storm events or accidental water disch es, also are typically addressed for a detailed analysis of slope stability. f-' ince detailed analysis has not been done, it is possible that the engineer may be of the opinhat this type of analysis is not representative of the actual risks posed by the slope, or is not anted by the site conditions or planned construction. If this is the case, then we recond that the engineer provide additional evaluation and conclusions regarding the hazaosed by debris avalanche, earth flow, debris fall, or mud flow from the slope east of the 19231 Avenue W. Suiec 9201 Lynnwood, Washin" 9BO36 (425) 771 — 3304 1470 JClll Oy L.Lyyt:l LCIIICIII MDDUI-LCIICDI lllU., )CLOU.LICI OCY'O'OD IO.JO, rCIUC J/u J-470 city of onds Hansen sidenca September 8, 1999 Page 2 additio and provide recommendations to mitigate the risk. The purposes of mitigation would be to p vent avoidable damage to the structure and limit risk to the inhabitants. e appreciate the opportunity to have provided this review. Please feel .free to call if you have questions or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. C-1 John E. Zipper, P. E. President tin Enclos e: Summary of Submittal Status: September 8, 1999 Zipper Union AmQOates, lar. 19231— 61° Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Waahin8tan 98036 (425) 771 — 3304 A 70 09 99 vy ��r N..� �..��.�� ....-- rave .,, .��..., �, ..wu��, vcN-u-oa 1V.JU, tiiu - � � s s City of E#monds Hansen sidence: Enclosure J-470 September 8, 1999 Page E-1 Propos Addidon/Remodel of Hansen Residence Summary of Submittal Status 15615 5'" Place West Edmon s, Washington rdinance No. 2661 of the City of Edmonds, dated January 27, 1998 and revised February 29, 1988 c .ns requirements for design, geotechnical analysis, construction, and permit submittal within the Me owdale Slide area of Edmonds. Paragraph 19.05.000 of the ordinance defines the purpose of the ordinan . Paragraph 19.05.030 describes required application submissions. The following sections of. this su ary contain our conclusions regarding the submittals received by our office for this project, includ' conformance with the required application submissions noted in the ordinance. Additionally, this su ary comments on conformance with Paragraph 19.05.050 of the ordinance, which describes disclos s, declarations, covenants, and waivers required for constniction in the Meadowdale Slide area. The fol wing submittals are required. by the referenced ordinance: Topog#pbic Map he topographic map provides sufficient information to evaluate geotechnical considerations for the pro ct. The topographic map does not, however, include items number seven and eight of Paragraph 19.05. OA of the ordinance; these items include locations of existing sanitary sewers, stormwater drains facilities, and existing underground utilities on and adjacent to the site. Gcote nical Report The site evaluation checklist utilized for this review is titled "Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landsl a Hazard Area Checklist for Permit Submittal" and appears to be dated May 1999. The status of the su itted geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. dated June 1, 1999 as supplemented by the Augppusi 26, 1999 letter by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. is summarized below: 1. Critical areas checklist — The critical areas checklist was not provided to us for review. It is our understanding that a critical areas checklist should be completed by the engineer who prepared the geotechnical report. 2. Lead design professional designation and statement - This document was not submitted for our review. 3. Vicinity Map — The vicinity map was submitted for review. The property outline on the vicinity map does not match the property boundary noted on the topographic survey. It is our assumption that the topographic survey provides the correct property boundary. This should be confirmed prior to issuing permit. 4. Topographic Map — The geotechnical engineer notes that the referenced topographic survey map was reviewed as a part of the geotechnical study. S. Environmental Checklist - The environmental checklist was not submitted for review. It is our understanding that the engineer who prepares the geotechnical report shall complete the environmental checklist. 6. Land Cleariing/Tree Cutting Plan — This document was not submitted for our review. Based upon the location and extent of the planned work, this plan is not considered ZtpPer ;Uwan A592cistes, 1 m 19231 60i Avenue w, Suite B201 Lynnwood. Washington 99036 (425) 77) — 3304 J470 09 99 VGl Uy. L1H' ......., -I 1..l41I G, vcN-u-oa iu..Jo, f City of Elmonds Hansen sidence: Enclosure J-470 September 8, 1999 Page E-2 necessary. We recommend, however, that the clearing limits be clearly noted on the referenced topographic survey plan, which also includes the plot plan. Geotechnieal Report — The geotechnical report is required to discuss all items within the. referenced checklist and to make specific recommendations, as listed in the "Geotechnical Report Guidelines" dated May 1999 by the City of Edmonds. We recommend that the geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. dated June 1, 1999, as supplemented by the August 26, 1999 letter by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. be considered to comply with the general provisions of the geotechnical guidelines with the following exceptions: • General Provision No. 6 requires that the engineer shall address all forms of earth movement including but not limited to slumps, debris avalanches, earth flows, debris falls, mudflows, and or deep-seated rotational or complex landslides. As discussed in our September 8, 1999 letter, we recommend that supplemental geotechnical studies be conducted and submitted to conform with this provision. e specific provisions listed in the geotechnical report guidelines are addressed in the geotec ical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.B. dated June 1, 1999, as supplemented by the August 26, 1999 it by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. with the following exceptions: Specific Provision 6 requires temporary excavations to be addressed. We recommend that the engineer recommend a setback from the planned east building perimeter for establishing clearing limits. f• Specific Provision 7 requires that the criteria in the critical areas and environmental checklists be addressed. This information is not included in the geotechnical report. Dmind!e Plan Drainage plans were not submitted for our review. The geotechnical engineer recommends that the pr act comply with standard stormwater control methods in accordance with the City of Edmonds requir ents. Gmdi g Plan The specific items listed in the City of Edmonds "Grading Fill and Excavation Permit Submittal Requi ments" are not included. The information submitted is, however, sufficient for geotechnical revie of stability issues. We recommend that the City determine whether specific grading plan submi als are required. As a minimum, we recommend that temporary erosion control measures and perm ent slope protection east and north of the addition be specified by the applicant. ural and Structural Plane Based on our review, the architectural and structural plans, dated June 2, 1999, appear to conform with a recommendations in the geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. dated June 1, 1999,. as suppl anted by the August 26, 1999 letter by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.. Lipper Zernam Aseoctstes. Ine- 19231 6" Avenuc W., Suitc 9201 t,ynnwood. Washington 98036 (425) 771 — 3304 J470 Ciry of E onds 1-470 Hansen sidence: Enclosure September 8, 1999 Page E-3 Affidav of Notice of Application ffidavit of Notice of Application was not submitted for our review. Applic t/Owner Liability and Landslide Acknowledgement pplicant/Owner Liability and Landslide Acknowledgement dated May 31, 1999 was submitted and con rms with City requirements. our report earth i letter. Arch slides Appl ical Declaration and Statement of Risk ieotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk was not submitted as a separate document. It is rstanding that the Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk shall be prepared by the ical engineer and submitted and addressed to the building official. Statements on page 9 of the Ical report conform with requirements under headings A and B of this section of the geotechnical idelines. The conclusions in the geotechnical report regarding item C (statistical probability of vement within a 25-year period) should be supplemented as discussed in our September 8, 1999 and/or Structural Engineer Declaration ►rchitect and/or Structural Engineer Declaration dated June 6, 1999 was submitted. The of the declaration does not conform with the geotechnical report guidelines. The guidelines tat the structural engineer state that they have had explained to the owner the risk of loss due to the site.as well as other specific declarations. it/Owner Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless icant/Owner Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless was not submitted for our review. 19231 — m Avcnuc W., Suitc 8201 1470 Tipper Leman Amocixtes. lar. Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 — 3304 AUG. -30' 99 (MON) 08: 23 DOWNTOWN EDMONDS LACY TEL:425 774 9842 '-A , , , - P. 002 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer August 26, 1999 City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 5t' Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Ms. Jeannine Graff, Building Official Subject: Additional Geotechnical Criteria Proposed Hansen Residence Remodel Project 15615 75"' Place W, Edmonds RECEI VAC) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS This engineering report presents additional geotechnical criteria in response to the City of Edmonds geotechnical review for the proposed Hansen remodel/addition project at 15615 75"' Place W. REFERENCES: • Proposed Hansen remodel/addition plans by Phil King, Designer • Geotechnical Evaluation Report by D. Bruce, P.E. dated June 1, 1999 • Zipper -Zeman Associates Review Report dated July 22, 1999 • Photographs This engineer met with City of Edmond's consultant, John Zipper on July 13, 1999 to review the proposed Hansen addition/remodel project and examine site conditions. Subsequently, Zipper-Zemen Associates presented their July 22, 1999 review report to Ms. Jeannine Graff, City of Edmonds Building Official. RESPONSE TO JULY 22, 1999 REVIEW REPORT: 1. Critical Areas Checklist — Submitted 2. Lead Design Professional Statement — Submitted 3. Vicinity Map— Submitted and clarified 4. Topographic Map — Submitted 5.. Environmental Checklist — Submitted 6. Land Clearing/Tree Cutting Plan — Submitted 7. Geotechnical Report This engineer has done additional research regarding the properties SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SrrE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION - DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, Washington 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX 546-8442 RUG.-30'99(MON) 08:23 DOWNT0WN EDMONDS LAN' TEL:425 774 9842 P. 003 City of Edmonds Community Services Dept. Page two surrounding the Hansen residence and conducted additional on -site investigations. • The services of a Geologist are not required for this modest Hansen rear -addition project. The surficial slide that occurred north of the Hansen property is understood to be fully analyzed by City of Edmond's engineer, Jim Walker, P.E. As this engineer understands the December 1996 event, somehow slope drainage work was occurring at the base of Dr. Craig Summer's property above the Andahl property at 15605 751h Place W. During the snow conditions and subsequent heavy rain conditions, localized surficial slides did occur. This engineer understands that subsequent hassles, and litigation have resulted in approved geotechnical drainage and stability work on this slope. This northerly surficial slide has nothing whatsoever to do with the natural conditions in the area but merely reflects the requirement for intelligent slope work under qualified, experienced geotechnical professional's direction. In other words, the problems north of the Hansen property will not occur "naturally"to the Hansen property. Likelihood of earth movement from upper slope to Hansen property and to Hansen proposed addition. This engineer conducted an additional site investigation with a hand auger and geologist's pick. Numerous locations were assessed for loose surficial slide potential. The slope directly above "easterly" of the Hansen property revealed dense, stable, mature trees with approximately two (2) to three and one-half (31/2) feet of colluvium soil atop the dense glacially consolidated sub -grade soil. This engineer observed (with one exception) no evidence of potential for "natural" dislodgment of trees or debris. The one exception concerns the tree atop the historic "partial cave". It is understood this "partial cave" was historically used during prohibition times. The tree that currently grows atop this "partial cave" should be removed to eliminate the slight potential for toppling. The most significant slope risk to the Hansen property would result from uncontrolled man caused misdirected water flow. It is understood that the upper AUG, -30' 99 (MON) 08 : 24 DOWNT0WN EDMONDS LAN' • TEL:425 774 9842 0 P. 004 City of Edmonds Community Services Dept. Page three property owner (Dr. Craig Summers) is fully aware of potential for slope disturbance due to uncontrolled drainage given the unfortunate incident north of the Hansen property. Thus, unless Dr. Summers somehow irresponsibly discharges a fire hydrant hose directly atop the Hansen slope, the risk of "natural" slide occurrence is extremely minimal. Temporary Slope Angle The east side of the Hansen addition requires a soil cut of approximately five (5) feet. This engineer recommends a temporary slope angle of 2H:3V under this engineer's inspection. Seasonal restrictions are not required if contractor utilizes good practices and complies with geotechnical expertise during excavations. DRAINAGE PLAN: As discussed, this engineer recommends that all storm water flow from impervious surfaces (new and pre-existing) be controlled by normal, approved methods (gutters, downspouts, and surface catch basins) and tight -lined into the City of Edmonds storm system already in place in the front road (75th Place M. GRADING PLAN: The extremely small amount of soil removal (approximately twenty three (23) cubic yards) does not require any specific grading calculations or plan. Obviously, on -site geotechnical inspection will dictate proper temporary erosion control measures (fences, straw bales as required, respect for neighboring properties, etc.) SOIL BEARING: The geotechnical report prepared by this engineer states a minimum soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot is available. This engineer has discussed project foundation with designer and concurs that the proposed footings are geotechnically compatible with site conditions. 1. Affidavit Of Notice Of Application — Submitted AUG.-3019IMON) 08:24 D0WNTOWN EDMONDS LAW TEL:425 774 9842 City of Edmonds Community Services Dept. Page four 2. Applicant/Owner Liability In Land Slide Acknowledgment — Submitted 3. Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk — Submitted within the June 1, 1999 Geotechnical Evaluation Report 4. Architect and/or Structural Engineer Declaration (Project owners are well aware of the slight risk of loss due to any slide activity above their property.) Declaration — Submitted 5. Applicant/Owner Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless — Submitted ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL DISCUSSION: As previously discussed in the June 1, 1999 Geotechnical Report, this engineer declared ... "the probability of earth movement on the Hansen property within a period of twenty five (25) years is less than ten percent (10%)." Obviously, precise statistical estimates are based on experience and site conditions. As stated numerous times, the key to slope stability and avoiding debris flow is proper drainage control. It is remotely possible that property owner above Hansens somehow becomes unstable and discharges a fire hydrant type pressure hose onto the slope above the Hansens. This remote possibility does not seem worth discussing. Natural build-up of colluvium does occur, however. This engineer's original investigation and subsequent re-examination of the slope indicates that sufficient quantities of loose colluvium are not present. Further, the stability of the vegetation on the slope (with the noted exception of the tree above the semi - cave) appears good, based on this engineer's experience. Certainly, a toppled or fallen tree could pose a structural hazard to the Hansen property. It is worthy to note that this potential slight hazard exists to the Hansen property regardless of this proposed modest rear addition. This engineer has re -reviewed the proposed plans and location and does not recommend any additional set -back restrictions from the current plan. Numerous discussions with the owners (Hansens) have made them fully aware of the need to 'keep an eye out" on any wobbly trees. Mr. Hansen's experience and background as a tree cutter allows him to bring extra expertise to this observation process. P. 005 AUG,-30'99(MON) 08:24 DOWNTOWN EDMONDS LAW TEL:425 774 9842 City of Edmonds Community Services Dept. Page five This engineer has worked on numerous projects where a debris protection wall ("catchment wall") has been constructed to minimize potential damage due to any slide activity. Based on this engineer's experience and site investigation, the proposed Hansen project does not warrant a catchment wall. ADDENDUM: This engineer has considerable experience with slopes, slide repairs, and slide prevention. Obviously, there is a slightly higher risk of damage to property at the base of a slope than would exist on a flat site. This engineer has had thorough discussions with property owners and believes they are genuinely aware of the slight risk of a fallen tree. The slope above (easterly) of the Hansen property does not indicate undue concern for slides, sloughing, or debris flow. Obviously, diligent monitoring through winter storms may require tree topping or select tree removal. This is considered a normal maintenance function. This engineer believes that the City of Edmonds has done a thorough job in reviewing the proposed addition project and recommends permit issuance, subject to geotechnical inspections. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical I Civil Engineer DMB:abj P. 006 AUG. -30' 99 (MON) 08: 23 DOWNTOWN EDMONDS LAW • TEL:425 774 9842 16 P, 001 p Atm :�- H N Lehtinc 0 By . *ate Engineering 3216 Wetmore Ave. Everett, WA 98201 .(425)252-2373 August 5, 1999 Page No. of M N0 TO: Tiffany and Scott Hansen 15615 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Hansen Addition Project at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA This letter is to verify that the undersigned has reviewed the geotechnical reports, understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to the owner the risk of loss due to slides on the site, and has incorporated into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. If you have any questions, please call at (425) 252-2373. Sincerely, �.y�Ya ✓T�ave" ��4 . Mickehfinen, P.E. k '•!ys5�a- ��yV�,��°f t RECEIVE® AUG - 61999 � TOPX AW1101,f DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS H N Lehtint By . 1pate Engineering 3216 Wetmore Ave. Everett, WA 98201 .(425)252-2373 Page No. of RECEIVED August 5, 1999 AUG - 6 1999 a MISQ TO; iffanand Scott Hansen DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. y CITY OF EDMONDS 15615 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 SUBJECT: Lead Design Professional Declaration Proposed Hansen Addition Project at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA This letter is to verify that the undersigned, as lead design professional, has reviewed the geotechnical report, understands its' recommendations and has incorporated into the design the established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage from any earth movement predicted in the report. If you have any questions, please call at cif 11110f H N Lehtinet By ate Engineering 3216 Wetmore Ave. Everett, WA 98201 (425)252-2373 August 5, 1999 MEMO TO: Tiffany and Scott Hansen 15615 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 Page No. of SUBJECT: Lead Design Professional Declaration Proposed Hansen Addition Project at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA This letter is to verify that the undersigned, as lead design professional, has reviewed the geotechnical report, understands its' recommendations and has incorporated into the design the established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage from any earth movement predicted in the report. If you have any questions, please call at Sincere , w'� s RECEIVED RECEIVED 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Zifper Zeman Associates, In� Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting J-470 July 22, 1999 City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 — 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf, Building Official Subject: Geotechnical Review Proposed Addition/Remodel of Hansen Residence 15615 — 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Ms. Graf - This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations concerning our geotechnical review of building permit application documents for the referenced project. These services were requested with your letter of transmittal dated June 21, 1999. The plan review number for this project is 99-177. Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. services were limited to geotechnical review for the referenced project. These review services do not include design, analysis, or engineering recommendations for the project. These review services were provided for the purpose of evaluating conformance of the documents with City of Edmonds permit requirements. These services were provided for the exclusive use of the City of Edmonds for specific application to the referenced project and purpose. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Ordinance No. 2661 of the City of Edmonds, dated January 27, 1988 and revised February 29, 1988 contains requirements for design, geotechnical analysis, construction, and permit submittal within the Meadowdale Slide area of Edmonds. Paragraph 19.05.000 of the ordinance defines the purpose of the ordinance. Paragraph 19.05.030 describes required application submissions. The following sections of this letter contain our conclusions regarding the submissions for this project, including conformance with the required application submissions noted in the ordinance. Additionally, this letter comments on conformance with Paragraph 19.05.050 of the ordinance, which describes disclosures, declarations, covenants, and waivers required for construction in the Meadowdale Slide area. The following submittals are required by the referenced ordinance: Topographic Map A topographic survey by AFM Industries Incorporated dated April 20, 1999 was submitted. The topographic map is at a scale of 1 inch to 10 feet, and contains two -foot contour intervals. The topographic map provides sufficient information to evaluate geotechnical 19231 — 36th Avenue W, Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 City of Edmonds • J-470 Hansen Residence July 22, 1999 Page 2 considerations for the project. The topographic map does not, however, include items number seven and eight of Paragraph 19.05.030A of the ordinance; these items include locations of existing sanitary sewers, stormwater drainage facilities, and existing underground utilities on and adjacent to the site. Geotechnical Report A geotechnical report by Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. dated June 1, 1999 was submitted for review. According to the ordinance, Paragraph 19.05.030B, the geotechnical report should discuss all items listed in the site evaluation checklist. The site evaluation checklist utilized for this review is titled "Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Checklist for Permit Submittal' and appears to be dated May 1999. The status of the submittal is summarized below: Critical areas checklist — The critical areas checklist was not provided to us for review. It is our understanding that a critical areas checklist should be completed by the engineer who prepared the geotechnical report. 2. Lead design professional designation and statement - This document was not submitted for our review. Vicinity Map — The vicinity map was submitted for review. The property outline on the vicinity map does not match the property boundary noted on the topographic survey. It is our assumption that the topographic survey provides the correct property boundary. This should be confirmed prior to issuing permit. 4. Topographic Map — The geotechnical engineer notes that the referenced topographic survey map was reviewed as a part of the geotechnical study. 5. Environmental Checklist - The environmental checklist was not submitted for review. It is our understanding that the engineer who prepares the geotechnical report shall complete the environmental checklist. 6. Land Clearing/Tree Cutting Plan — This document was not submitted for our review. Based upon the location and extent of the planned work, this plan is not considered necessary. We recommend, however, that the clearing limits be clearly noted on the referenced topographic survey plan, which also includes the plot plan. 7. Geotechnical Report — The geotechnical report is required to discuss all items within the referenced checklist and to make specific recommendations, as listed in the "Geotechnical Report Guidelines" dated May 1999 by the City of Edmonds. The general provisions of the geotechnical report guidelines contain numerous specific requirements for geotechnical reports. Based upon the limited extent of the new construction, and the soil and groundwater conditions encountered by the geotechnical engineer in two borings completed for the geotechnical evaluation, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 19231 — 36'" Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 City of Edmonds J-470 Hansen Residence July 22, 1999 ti Page 3 we recommend that the report be considered to comply with the general provisions of the geotechnical guidelines with the following exceptions: • General Provision No. 1 requires that if the evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be reviewed and signed by a qualified state licensed geologist. The geotechnical evaluation as presently completed does not involve geologic evaluations or interpretations. The supplementary geotechnical evaluations, as discussed below in this letter, may require geologic evaluations or interpretations. We recommend that the engineer determine whether the services of a geologist are required in order to provide the supplementary geotechnical evaluations. •. General Provision No. 5 requires that existing sewer and drainage facilities within 50 feet of the site be noted. On page 2 of the referenced report, the engineer discusses a localized surficial slide occurring north of the subject property as a result of drainage conditions. We recommend that the engineer state conclusively whether the drainage conditions on the localized slide area north of the subject property introduce any risk of instability on the subject property. • General Provision No. 6 requires that the engineer shall address all forms of earth movement including but not limited to slumps, debris avalanches, earth flows, debris falls, mudflows, and or deep-seated rotational or complex landslides. The landslide history of the area and the landslide history and/or probability on the specific site should be discussed. As discussed subsequently in this letter, we recommend that supplemental geotechnical studies be conducted and submitted to conform with this provision. The specific provisions listed in the geotechnical report guidelines are addressed in the submitted geotechnical report with the following exceptions: • Specific Provision 6 requires temporary excavations to be addressed. We recommend that the engineer recommend the temporary slope angle to be used on the east side of the addition, recommend a setback from the planned east building perimeter for establishing clearing limits, and determine whether seasonal restrictions are required. • Specific Provision 7 requires that the criteria in the critical areas and environmental checklists be addressed. This information is not included in the geotechnical report. Drainage Plan Drainage plans were not submitted for our review. The geotechnical engineer recommends that the project comply with standard stormwater control methods in accordance with the City of Edmonds requirements. Zipper Zeman Associates. Inc. 19231— 360'Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 City of Edmonds J-470 Hansen Residence July 22, 1999 Page 4 Grading Plan The topographic survey/plot plan submitted for review includes grading calculations and notes. The plan indicates total soil removal of roughly 23 cubic yards. The specific items listed in the City of Edmonds "Grading Fill and Excavation Permit Submittal Requirements" are not included. The information submitted is, however, sufficient for geotechnical review of stability issues. We recommend that the City determine whether specific grading plan submittals are required. As a minimum, we recommend that temporary erosion control measures and permanent slope protection east and north of the addition be specified by the applicant. Architectural and Structural Plans Based on our review, the architectural and structural plans, dated June 2, 1999, appear to conform with the recommendations in. the geotechnical report. Plan sheet 7 notes that soil - bearing pressure is 2,500 pounds per square foot. This will require either overexcavation as discussed on page 3 of the geotechnical report, to provide 3,000 pounds per square foot bearing, or modification to a 2,000 pounds per square foot bearing design. Affidavit of Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application was not submitted for our review. Applicant/Owner Liability and Landslide Acknowledgement Applicant/Owner Liability and Landslide Acknowledgement dated May 31, 1999 was submitted and conforms with City requirements. Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk was not submitted as a separate document. It is our understanding that the Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk shall be prepared by the geotechnical engineer and submitted and addressed to the building official. Statements on page 9 of the geotechnical report conform with requirements under headings A and B of this section of the geotechnical report guidelines. The conclusions in the geotechnical report regarding item C (statistical probability of earth movement within a 25-year period) should be supplemented as discussed subsequently in this letter. Architect and/or Structural Engineer Declaration Architect and/or Structural Engineer Declaration dated June 6, 1999 was submitted. The language of the declaration does not conform with the geotechnical report guidelines. The guidelines require that the structural engineer state that they have had explained to the owner the risk of loss due to slides on the site as well as other specific declarations. Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 19231 — 36 ° Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 City of Edmonds • J-470 Hansen Residence July 22, 1999 Page 5 Applicant/Owner Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless Applicant/Owner Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless was not submitted for our review. Discussion Of Findings And Recommendations In general, several items . specific to both the short-term and long-term hazard of instability are missing from the submittal. These items include designation of clearing limits, temporary constructed slope angles, and seasonal restrictions (if required) for the temporary excavation on the east side of the house. The engineer should provide this information in order to address stability considerations during the construction period. On a. longer -term basis, the risk of the various forms of earth movement noted in the geotechnical report guidelines should be addressed. The landslide hazard map incorporated with the Roger Lowe and Geoengineers reports designates a statistical probability of slides, slumps, debris avalanches, and debris flows on and onto the subject property. The referenced City ordinance requires that the statistical probability of earth movement within a 25-year period shall be addressed as a condition of the building permit. The geotechnical engineer is also required to address the susceptibility of the risk or hazard to correction by onsite improvements and the measures taken to mitigate the risks or hazard. It is our understanding that the City ordinance requires that the risk of earth movement within a 25-year period be 10 percent or less. On this property, the risk of debris slides, debris avalanches, or debris flows from the subject property and neighboring property on the steep slope east of the planned construction is not adequately addressed. _During a visit to the subject property, we noted that groundwater seepage, pistol -butted or bowed tree trunks, and topographic conditions consistent with previous debris flows are present on the subject slope. The Roger Lowe and GeoEngineers investigations were completed on the order of 15 to 20 years ago. It is possible that soil conditions on the slope have degraded with time, by. natural weathering processes and soil creep, since the Roger Lowe and. GeoEngineers investigations. It has been our experience that a build-up of colluvium and weathered soil on slopes comprised of overconsolidated glacial soils, occurring over a number of decades, results in an increasing risk of debris flows. On the subject slope, the presence of large trees further increases the hazard of serious damage caused by such debris flows. We recommend that the engineer provide additional evaluation and conclusions regarding the hazards posed by this slope. A large number of slides occurred in the Puget Sound region during the last three years, on oversteepended slopes comprised of dense glacially consolidated soils mantled with a layer of colluvial or weathered soils. In slides of this nature, the trees and wood debris brought down in the debris flow represents a battering hazard to structures at the base of the hill. UBC Chapter 18, Section 1806.5.2, requires that a setback be established from the base of a slope to a structure. One of the purposes of this required setback is to reduce the risk of damage due to debris flow or failures of the slope uphill of a structure. We recommend that the design engineer Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 19231 — 36t6 Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington"98036 (425) 771 - 3304 City,of Edmonds • • J-470 Hansen Residence July 22, 1999 Page 6 provide a clear, specific analysis of the hazard represented by debris, avalanche, debris flow, or mudflow from the slope onto the subject property. We also recommend that the engineer determine whether mitigation is to be incorporated into the design and construction to reduce the hazard to the structure and occupants represented by debris from the east slope. We appreciate the opportunity to have provided this review. , Please feel free to call if you have any questions or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. �•�2 John E. Zipper, P. E. President n A- 2MI Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 1923.1 — 36 b Avenue W., Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 DATE 15 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.' p __CITY_OF_EDMONDS- Faz - - -- - - t6L7S - - AE - - -- -- --- -- - - - - - - --- _- - - ----------- --- - _ - - -- ---------- - - ---------------------------- PACE PREPARED BY - - --- ---- oorroweriwonc JMV\\ M agolu1A] 1,0,1aW, addreim 15616 75th PI W CAmnnde c'„11nw No- 4410AG.A15Y state We � _ Zip code 98026 Alpine Attn Eric Fidelity Ngtional Title :c ay of Washington. ALTA Commitment, Page 2 - Order No. 0154293 "SCHEDULE A" (continued): 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is described as follows: All that portion of Tract 24, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of Snohomish County, described as follows:: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of that portion of Tract 24 lying East of County Road; THENCE in a Northerly direction along the Easterly margin of said road 82 feet to the True point of Beginning; THWCE continue Northerly along the Easterly margin of said road for 60 feet; THENCE Easterly parallel to South boundary line of Tract 24, a distance of 120 feet] THENCE Southerly parallel to the County Road 60 feet; THENCE Westerly parallel to the South boundary line of Tract 24 for 120 feet to the point of Beginning situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. RVVICES �C�'�V E,D GTR DEVE1.6" of EDM09DS 8. BASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: May 13, 1963 Recording No.: 1612248 In Favor Of: Common owners Purpose: Common driveway and common carport The description contained in the above instrument is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. Said easement contains a provision for bearing a proportionate or equal cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said driveway/carport by the common kWj unpro. --- �„�,D�•?'.,^-n`+m.+�«'rnfiRrnrw'?-�E,rd+1f4'r�YG�'dVwzr::tr�'S�h-BadV f rn'�+sit�,�r.r•�N.,,,rr,• ?'�'s•m';'iFU,�s,axe:.-M•.yk,�.vy,.wwtirn:,..•,�rw;.,.��*c•�..�,,..r-w+tn+'+�'"1,.c�+..,-,`'!"�n!r,..:-•, CITY OF EDMONDS - COMMUNITY SERVI TP&dTNREXE RIGHT-OF-WAY CO E • r. q ^-� R�O.c _ ermit No. C) / �/�N ��'�► Issue Date _;2 -= , A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Canny \R*'.vntractor: Name 815 Mercer Street Mailing Address 4eatt'1P, WA 98111 City State Zip Name Mailing Address City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 15615 75 P1 W Type of Work to be. Done: Install 570° of 2" PE IP Main from 7° S c/1 158 St SW to 5401 N c/1 158 St SW D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily lk Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y ®cN F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees, to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court c �s; and tt me ees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FORA PERIOD OF ONE . YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE, OF�THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. e7 • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code: • Street to be kept clean at all times. 4 Traffic Control .to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: June 19, 1991 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: ►/g Z Time Authorized: Void after 1_6a PT g?Ja0 days. O w Special Conditions: NA �n U RELEASED BY\Q A VV %�'--'�' Date O w NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE PERMIT Restoration Fee: _ Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: INSPECTED BY 7 X =g Date 0 Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NO S (Fund ,111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: f � Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 H N Lehtinei* By . Wate Engineering 3216 Wetmore Ave. Everett, WA 98201 .(425)252-2373 August 5, 1999 MEMO TO: Tiffany and Scott Hansen • ' 15615 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 Page No. of 11 SUBJECT: Geotechnical Evaluation Proposed Hansen Addition Project at 15615 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA This letter is to verify that the undersigned has reviewed the geotechnical reports, understands its recommendations, has explained or has had explained to the owner the risk of loss due to slides on the site, and has incorporated into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. If you have any questions, please call at (425) 252-2373. Sincerely, �SM.RFEFT Ir,',j, RECEIVED QrA''r//Wzf DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS LOCATION MAP y{rys,a7 Mortgage Attn Eric Fidelity National Title Cc ay of Washington, ALTA Commitment, Page 2 Order No. 01S4293 -SCHEDULE A" (continued); 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the Covnty of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is .described as follows; All that portion of. Tract 24, PLAT OF MEADOwDALs BEACH, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of Snohomish Country, described as follows: BEGINNINo at the Southwest corner of that portion of Tract 24 lying East of County Road; THENCE in a Northerly direction along the Easterly margin of said road 82 feet to the True Point of Beginning; THENCE continue Northerly along the Easterly margin of said road for 60 feet; THENCE Easterly parallel to South boundary line of Tract 24,. a distance of 120 feet; THENCE Southerly parallel to the County Road 60 feet; THzXCB Westerly parallel to the South boundary line of Tract 24 for 120 feet to the Point of Beginning situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington.mom f fit, 0 P� C SUN 5 DEVELOpMEIVT CM OF EDM VICES CTq DNDS 8. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: May 13, 1963 Recording No.: 1612240 In Favor of: Common owners Purpose: Common driveway and common carport The description contained in the above instrument is not aufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. Said easement contains a provision for bearing a proportionate or equal cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of said drivewav/caruort by the commony( 10 ' f Pre -cast Concrete catch basins with cast iron or metal grates for most residential and commercial applications; e; H withstand vehicular traffic, adept to concrete, plastic or metal drainage systems, and are long lasting. DISTRIBUTION BOX: 12" square with four, 4" outlets can adept to rigid or flexible plastic pipe. 6" and 12" riser extensions and cast iron grates available. f DB1212 Box DB1212S Box, Septic RECEIVED DBR6 6" Riser Extension DBR12 12" Riser Extension Q FEBZO�� DBC1G Cast Iron Grate FEB U :. DSCIGTS Cast Iron Grate Thin Slot DBCL Concrete Lid =MRING "JUNCTION BOX: 18" square with four 6" outlets for larger residential drainage systeROPE-__ ;k 12" and 18" riser extensions and welded steel grate. Can use 4" or 6" drain pipe. J81818 Box 200lbs JBR6 6" Riser Extension JBR12 12' Riser Extension ' JBR18 18"Riser Extension JBCIG Cast Iron Grate 'T'y JBCL Concrete Lid JBWG Welded Steel Grate J Box Pre -cast concrete catch basins for storm drainage or retention/detention systems accommodate 4" through 24" metal or plastic pipe and up to 18" concrete pipe depending upon the size of catch basin. r r 11Y1RE-1 CB 15: , rStandard of the industry. The.30 x34"x45 OD catch basin has four „ ,20 knockouts'for pipe entry. 22 x2li"07r Qfor std:.cast ironaframe aWgr�ate. 46B1t6Bx =-BaseaSecticjn ; .' `_ '.a $ 62,000dltis, TYPE 1 CB 16 (1-L): For up to 24" pipe. Size is 36"x40"x44" OD, for standard cast iron frame & grate. I' as four 26" knock outs for pipe entry and uses a 6" reducin to slab $21.00 $21.00 $14.00 $21.00 $16.50 $24.50 $3.00 $48.00 S30.00 $ 39.00 $48.00 $39.00 $6.00 $39.00 $130.00 9 P C816B Base Section 2600 Ibs 4260.00 CB16RS6 6" Reducing Top Slab, 36"x40"x6" 400 Ibs $70.00 CB16146 6" Riser Extension, 36"x40"x6" 360 Ibs 840.00 C816R12 12" Riser Extension, 36"x40"x12" 700 lbs $45.00 ! CB16CL Concrete Lid CB 16 760 Ibs $48.00 TYPE 1 CB 17: Curb Inlet for up to 12" pipe measures 30"x34"x23" OD with four 17" knockouts for pipe entry. Accepts standard cast iron frame and grate, CB17B Base 1300lbs 5120.00 '`.. TYPE a Parking lot catch%ba�isin is 39hx3,4,-x56", has three 6 knockouts for pipe entry* ¢„(Seattle,241 PLCB) # :and}oneyl2" knockout. Accepts sta,ndard,.cas2 iron frame"and'grate Base ,r25001bs,.. fi $1SO= CATCH BASIN EXTENSION RISERS: Reinforced pre -cast concrete risers for commercial catch basins are available in 2", 4", 6" and 12" extensions. CBR2 2" Riser Extension 96 Ibs $20,00 CBR4 4" Riser Extension 194 Ibs $28.00 CBR6 6" Riser Extension 290 Ibs $32.00 R CBR12 12" Riser Extension 580 Ibs $40.00 CBCL Concrete Lid, 30"X34" 300 Ibs $36.00 MANHOLE EXTENSION RISERS: Reinforced pre -cast concrete risers for Type 2 manhole and catch basin use. 24" ID. MHR2 2" Riser Extension 87 Ibs $12.00 MHR4 4" Riser Extension 175 Ibs $18.00 Inv- 111YV I �� f L� s k-_-7VW, M 4MA ! 4 � -71 l � �T► (fn� Page 1 0 r. 1 , S-' o D 0 !� o .o � v JG. s ti s^ A Conforms to: • Washington State APWA/WSDOT' (Standard Specifications) • City of Seattle Standard Plan No. 241 6" Riser Section • Weight = 290 lbs. 12" Riser Section H • Weight = 580 lbs. Precast Base Section • Weight = 2,500 lbs. • Three 12" knockouts provided for pipe entry Reinforcing • 0.12 sq. inAinear ft. in both .directions (all components) FROM : TIFFANY SPEER INC FAX NO. Feb. Z2 ;2bbb 1;2:b1F'M N1 1-.0110 eG UU ua: aia BODINE CONSTRUMON COMPANY, IN C. OFFICE: (425) 778.2557 Drainage C011SUIrants ' Drainage Cattaacrors r uuuwl :+s:u i (426) 881-2577 FAX: (425) 672-2434 RMAIL: B000N (_,-Na.netcom.com WA 9633'1 Tiffany Hansen 15615 - 75"' PI. W. Edmonds, WA. 98026 Ph: 425-771-2501 Cell: 206-499-5799 Fax: 425-771-5941 Field Representative Bill Miller February 16, 2000 Bid M-0216B00 Property Address 15615 — 751" Pl. W. Edmonds, WA. Bodine Construction Company, Inc. is pleased to furnish the following bid proposal to install a 3 piece catch basin assembly in front of the above noted address; each section to be drilled and pinned with 1/2" rebar. Bid includes saw cut & demo existing asphalt street. Excavate to an estimated 7'to Install storm basin in existing storm draln alignment, whose depth to water level Is quoted to approximately 6'. Basin shall be bedded in 5/8" crushed rock, compacted to with- stand settling. Remaining spoils to be hauled away. Inlet and outlet to be grouted, both sides. Balance of hole to be filled with 5; 8" crushed rock compacted @ 8" lifts to surface level of street. Asphalt to be laid by others. The Inlet & outlet to be inspected by City of Edmonds City Official. Special Notes. Permit fees extra Bid Amount: $3.180.00 Plus Tax Terms: Upon bid acceptance please sign and return one copy of bid. A 40% deposit is required to schedule work, balance is due upon completion. **We Accept Visa & MasterCard** Acceptance Date Sincerely, Accepted Bi!I Miller Bodine Construction Company, Inc. FROM TIFFANY SPEER INC FAX NO. reo _e uu 1 t : u5t e,o 1 M* L61.#,tr•kjct x on Feb. 22 2000 12:02PM P2 t"b 1 G?2 P434 p. 1 BOOB 212"9t 9W Lynnwood WA 9N38 011ce: 425 778.25ST Eastside: 425 W-2577 cw 425 672.2434 E-moll: bocon&.notcom,com Fax 'Tol {--� ; From: VV Fair — -7 J q ( Pagoa: a(fZ29C • i Phony 4zr-). -7-7 n Date! R/—a .1 iv) Re: CC: C] Urgent 0 For Review 0 please Commmnl 0 Dioaao Reply . Commen* BOVINE CONSTRUCTION 6009 212TH ST SV G� LMNLICOG Ua 99036 l- ' ( DATE: 9Z/Z2/00 ME:�:��.:i� Mr553 31R t :�3�ii TErstf' JFS'� ,E7fl UL) 'On I t•R-L E-S D-R R-F-T 000i ;J REF v BATCHN 1 CID TYPE: VI TYPE" 'PR TOTAL: $I2o'cF@0 RCCT: 4217Bt96817p4961 UP: W1 RF: 011654 . ;.. CAMMMER t1CKR ULEDGES RECEIPT ff GGODS R!;D/OR SERVICES IN THE RCiG'dNT OF TO 6 !� n THE iDTL :'i�7W1� IEREON AND RGRUS PEA 00 7HE OBLIGATIONS SET FORTH BY TEE ENT UITH THE ISSBFii t4ivy) CARDME►18ER'; AGIEE .THANK YOU FOR U"ING Vlstl 9 8TREET4r'WjLF ATTORNEYS AT LAW LEWICKI & WEINBERG A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 720 OLIVE WAY SUITE 1610 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 {206) 624-1199 PETER S. LEWICKI, P.s. ADMITTED WASHINGTON AND NEW YORK HAROLD G. WEINBERG, P.S. ADMITTED WASHINGTON. ILLINOIS AND MONTANA V"FCFIVED APR 2 51985 ENGINEERING April 15, 1985 Mr. Peter Hahn Corim.unity Services Director City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Hahn: LAWRENCE K. ENGEL ADMITTED WASHINGTON DAVID S. TESKE, OF COUNSEL ADMITTED WASHINGTON AND OREGON I am the owner of a residence located at 15615 75th Place West in the Meadowdale section of Edmonds. I must confess to a great deal of confusion surrounding Ordinance 2445. The recent explanation dated April 11, 1985 added to my confusion. I believe the best way for me to begin to dispel this lack of understanding would be to determine exactly how my property is being impacted by the city ordi- nance. The house in question is located on the landward side of 75th Place West. Could you please advise me as to where this property is situated with regard to the potential slide area as disclosed by whatever study or data the City of Edmonds is basing its position on. Eventually, either the undersigned or a subsequent purchaser will probably want to expand the size of this house as it is very small (approximately 900 square feet). This will involve foundation work, undoubtedly. How will the property be impacted from the standpoint of obtaining appropri- ate building permits, etc.? I look forward to hearing a response to these question. Thank you for your attention to this matter. PSL/dm �9 ID APR 1 b 1��5 OOM�I0N�T1 SER�iCESAl�' Very truly yours, PETER S. LEWICKI, P.S. FAer. Lewicki lt(lCµ1Z9' ATE RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS �sgW MAILING O l CITY ZIP TELEPHONE F 1) 9 a 4125- --_)e. NAME '''.. E ADDRESS V a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE L % o NAUe ICBL# '![PERMIT EXPIRES USE �SRPERMIT Glft �W ZONE o NUMBER JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS /,.4 r 44/ '0"', �r PLAT NAMEISUBDIVISIION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE S PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved Rw Permk Requke6 Street Ue9 1.Req'd EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Raquked p Sid—ulk Requked Q REOUIRED DEDICATION FT under WIMOrequirad Q METER SIZE I LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED O YES ❑ NO x z REMARKS S OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLJDRAINAGE sg ENOINEEfliNO REVIEWED BV DATE f% W ADDRESS FIRE .REVIEWED BY i•-„/ ��•`� DATE m CITY ' ZIP' TELEPHONE s 6 O O . 'VARI�q] �pCE'OR'CU ` = �''l 1.- 119 SHORELINEORADBO]� INSPECTION -RE 'D BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER '�'„ EXPIRATION DATE '� CHECKED BY -- ;.. _ V — 0 — 3 ' -DYES O $ T' $EPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXE T .'SIGN AREA; ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ...ALLOWED PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. Si OTaO pox o/o� EXP r° a5 1 7 15 r-' ❑ NEW -� RESIDENTIAL ® LUMBIN MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FTid gP-AOPOSED SETBACKS (FT.} \ COMMERCIAL ALLOWED PROPOSED �J°l a6rU FRONT SIDES///R�AR ��/�.�� FRONT L/g SLID, LA�FAR/ C 6, 2 ADDITION ®❑' ❑ CHANGEOF USE L� z REMODELv3''❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑- SIGN PARKING RF PROVIDED "O,~ LOT AREA P NING EVIEWE �B- DATE g 1��, ,.X b ❑ REPAIR ❑, GRACING - ❑ FENCE GYDS 1 FT) REMARKS - - (1 It- Le.. (iVIC KS, ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER t Z WALL ;'. ❑, ❑ CARPORT ❑',rR z CAI�NI�NO FIREALA M�ER 'f tC^ (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS 0 ACTH - m'1 EXPLAIN U 'L-�►'� D �•- SF ' CHECKED BY ST CTION OCCUPANT uel NUMBER NUMBER -OF - CRITICAL - OF STORIES UNITS LNG'. AREA NUMBER q — © SPECIAL IN'. REQUIRED SP CEISN� AREA LOAD PANT DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS : z PROGRESS'INSPECTIONS'PER UBC ;1,081FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 9 �. a nn,asr,-c4- . belrodm a sr MA.5rop" bA 74 VALUATION Description ' FEE Description FEE Plan Check "'LL ._— State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE, 8 p 1 I d/LOi, $LOPE % /e "' ` `•' " Buildingpermit—y k^ City Surcharge ---� PLAN CHECK Nt VESTED OATE Plumbing,tT -. r Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE ORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT OVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. s Engr. Review PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT..1 YEAR- PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chit. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY Fire Inspection Receipt H 9 FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due Q y (f i NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.- Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. i AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL Th a application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING INSPECTION Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN' SATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. 1 1 S S NATURE DATE SIGN U (O E ENT) , r JTOFOR GATE SIGNED (425) 771-0220 AA SED BY DATE ATTENTION M 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW -16EcT& CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN ACCOUNTING o A,7 f// d / 1112-tted PERMIT EXPIRES L "'".- use PERMIT �. CITY OF E®MiONDS --' ZONE �G-2U NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB UITErA., O N{P�M E7NAME OF BUSIN SS ,p'^ ADDRESS I / / ` / �•'„ TI/� i�- l 1 LEG/AL DESCRIPTION CHECK SU/BDIVISION NO, LID NO. �¢++ MAILING ADDRESS V � ��/ F% 7_ I V PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Appr d 0A" CITY IP TELEPHONE �- + �.. RW Permit Requirea� ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDIEATION sues, use Pmmn Rq' _ (/'�„Y (,/*� V PROPOSED Sia¢wau Rachd eyWwa NAME, METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO, OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED w _ %�� / .•� YES NO ❑ w r ADORES. S REMARKS 'Z / Z C STY `! �?IP TELWHnNE .i:,. 3. . NAME % �Y JA//�t-- � l%O© 4_ .4/L- mot! NENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWEDBY ' ¢O ADORES REVIEWED BY i CI-- ZIP TELEPHONE S!/C /[�PS/G•R1Q%%(,✓l,w/[l�S��yy�gl O O u VARIANCE OR CU ADBq SHORELINE a STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRAT'�O/p%/��jOA E C K 7 O SEPA RE IE�N^�{{ ,,tt r � �~l SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE �E+�tEMgTt; IALL WED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED O LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - INCLUDE ALl EASEMENTS E%F 1111 l I1 t t' n q tt 'LOT COVERAGE REOUIREDSETBACKS(FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS I-T.) wALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR .FRONT VR SIDE REAR O W PROP�YITAX A COUNT P fl ENO. •,,.-� a l/J, LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY ATE f NEWSIDENTIAL �pLUMBINGl MECH Wp REMARKS ADDITION 1 COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN ❑ REPAIR GRADING FENCE CVDS ❑ ( X FT) �y�F/+K pr, ov TY'"- nF G STRULTION E OCCUPANT.�-7 OTHER Zip — /v GROUP /x�� ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ ��' FFF / i pj/ SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAPSAjl a p (� OCCUPANT Z UGA�ftPDRT ❑, RETAIINIRNYG WALL. [ RENEWAL REQUIRED YES A •fi1A �LOAD a (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) Ej(PLAIN REMARKS ✓ L• + v c7 rf�J PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 w NUMBER NUMBER OF (/�'p� (y^-/��\) ,/ j. ,�/ /�� O 9'g J m OF DWELLING AREAISAL f9- �IJV Si12 (,/�/ !Y. f"�/1 J r#�46O m O STORI F-S UNITS NUMBER" DEE RI E ORK TO BE DON : � Wf Ix %,6 f �7N c�, /1f h 6 FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED J ! : J:: (✓/��,p VALUATION FEEEE� '.f�¢ 1�p""p�ur/a.' PLAN CHECK FEE,(JL/ 1---_ lid T SO CE LhZI G / tI i.� EO BUILDING PL NCHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING �Ob MECHANICAL , �p THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO ',.. BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL 3 DOMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS• DRIVEWAYS. MAROUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE J SEPARATE PERMISSION. g STATE SURCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION: iB0 DAYS �j�y.y a $-+Q PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS S ORFt DRAIN GE FEES f�� U) w 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENE. INSPECTION FEE /"4] IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF ¢ EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND P/PQfPsS/Q✓9I114I1 {LoG (� W x ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE. ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY o FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE '.; p DEEMED TO MODIFY. WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ¢ NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVI SION." ' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE H'e R'e BY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION, `"ALL This application is not a permit unfd signed by the AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Opplial t his/her Deputy: and Fees are y Iidth antl IN VIOLATION HE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION ceipl is acknowledgedm space prov,aao. WORKMEN'S P SARON INSURANCE AND RCW 18,27. r fe tiIGNATU E W R QR A E ) D E SIG D (425) QF ICI LS SI NATURE DATE 771-0220 ��-t-9 9 RELE Y DgZE A ENTION TUR�— ( (! IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR IJVCE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW wspecroR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK .OWNER • GOLD ASSF—OR PERMIT EXPIRES C CITE( OF EDMONDS �°q PERMIT, 93 ZONLS', �[�• NUMBER �" 4 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOBooREssY ` , , } SUITEIAPTn ' S V`-'' OWNE MEl!7,NAME OF BUtSII1NES ' /� 'LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK , SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. Y y ( ic w MAILING ADDRESS 3 Il/A\JI ; e PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION rescP app:o„ed ❑ RI Permit Requited ❑ Streot We Patmit R. ❑ ❑ O lI ZIP - TELEPHONE I - /n� PROPOSED sidewala aegeued ❑ NAMF� - /_� ( " / METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV. REQUIRED ` A ' r u 111 YES ❑ NO ❑ 7 = - I ADDRESS , REMARKS w = ❑ t �� r 7- A R z Z CITY ZIP y,V13 TELEPHONE '�i2�3 NAME ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY ¢ ADDRESS O FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY ¢ a 2 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE VARIANCE OR CU ADBk SHORELINE a O ❑ STATE LICENSE NUMBER - EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT I ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED O LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INCLUDE ALL EASEMENTS F EXP ¢ 7 LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS ( F1 FRONT UPSIDE REAR Z z G O N o . —�-c PROP TY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW 8Y DATE J'{ J f n ( ll l a ❑ NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING! MECH REMARKS ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ - CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS FENCE ❑ ( _ X FT) OTHER CHECKED BY TY^' O/F.C,,OONSTRUCTION /e' � U C DE OCCUPANT GROU DEMOLISH ❑ TANK - ElO'1+' I SPECIAL INSPECTO-GARAGE AREA OCCUPANT ❑ ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL REQUIRED ❑ Yi-S LOAD CARPORT - = R KERY (TYPE OF USE, BUS N{rS5 OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: r I REMARKS Ci Coil ,! `r PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 0 w NUMBER ❑ OF NUMBER OF_ DWELLING l 1 CRITICAL (/��,' ARFAS I ` m o STORIES UNITS '� �-/ NUMBER / DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE', r I e7 �7 At FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED �/��) l� � ji I � �iq� �jo /lJ l/ lJ� Ll..ii Y� i•+ t VI.�C. 0,1041 VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL 'yy ' r THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADINGIFILL DOMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS,DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. g STATE SURCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION: 1e00AYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR • PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS STORM DRAINAGE FEES w "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE. HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND C AU_CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY x PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT ❑ FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENTOF ANYCITY ORDINANCE x NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAYTHE CITY'SABILITY TO ENFORCE ANYORDINANCE PROVISION." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION: THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION, APPROVAL THE OWNER, I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TIONt AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Off clalior,h /hec0opury:,a d.Fees-are pad IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO-.- W 11RKAAFNS CfIMPFNCAl1(1N INCIIRANCF ANFIRCW'IR-2 e^:�w.'".�''', - FOR INSPECTION a epf sack owletlgeeC -'spa opovidetl -. W 7711111111 0 ` t �/ 0. CATTEI�TilO.�.. S fi 4tiv4t i!S UIVLAWFUL-TO USE OR.00CUPY A BUILDING R STRUCT.URE UNTIL , A FINAL INSPECTION -HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 Z z z a - Loa uj 0 rc a- a 1 I 0) CD 10 w m Z W LLJ > @ 0 0 U Lu a. F— LIJ U-1 CD oy 31U i=`13diS 11 11 X W >tV 0 w U W, cc LU i m -7j r— a 103S - dv vl Wl1S)lS W IOlS MS 1S H1491.0 ice, � rasa rods ofsa sraD�riAD fp_� f`iarsl �i � rrrcr �� "`i`ou � dlror` or[br t oast sods r _ n-, asrst sera, arcs! J ar9! La99 slBD, On 1 Lft4! J z �.� Itr9f -Im j/ D it LfSDI ZLL9t ,nr.., -..$-- ".Jp4 , ,,V/IAYA/. rv''- t 'V(f✓, I(r� j � us9 J� f�'II.9r rats aZ9l cracf90"' ` ;r a �' oo,-i , rMal � y ,J �1 �r.S LBs mLsi / tiY -yam foes O� roar �'f-s---F ai 7r, ozDt raib7 >.am .a f anffZ9l� '➢ )yn SILO( Du9t 6o[9f � ri arosr oLBP arse rust � Hof rtgb��}''"t, Oe89 C°V r J 1 sa9r � rzrD� eob'si T � :r Up �� o a aroaf �f ' eLro:„- MS n "on IfAD AMI f asrl r188 oi- r:e9f udsr LLSD'''r} , Awl ZWO !or[ Dar! 0 Lj7 sass zon' S_, DaDPf 9L99t LZ9rr kLDrl rLP9f iZ9Pt ll .1, E t_t9rePr Nowt fZBri i! , af8ri G - di-, 6Z[Pr rLLrf MPI tour Sm yyy ZICPr PL9mt :E /fLst [aft Merl 1 i 6 laDD my 6 !�'9rt �Cr Wl Ji s+ 7 ,, aG1DI fort - rur� - . �, mac' mcri root - rzcrr i� atY� " x 9 t fL_l _ Sim� w-, Le u -uaatP rrsrf szar asrr au ozu OmUi1 D rras ci9s oml Dace au Dau zLur i rbDsr 1 af�'�1,n ,'�j _ 9lDD MS 1S 9 l 0 doae frc[ [ou u�[ ears! rrL[ awl N 3 Zov eau 0 urrl arrr 0 sza sass syu z u„ - QBAY PKrl" rl6f \ a31`J verve 0 W!, SONONO3 d uio 'a10 S30IAOS N IVQO,3 i 666t 9 0 3 A I raa i �_ Nand AlNnoo moo O"A101 6"I-GWA(WO WMCM.# A d OU91-919" v 3SKYH ANYJJI.L 7ZO66 66-or-1, INY 'SMIAR HisnaNz ov wr AS WO AgAHf]S DlHdVHDOdOJ, 1z 9v 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - oil - - - - - - - - -- : - - - - - - - ar, art__-- orl - - ezi - Gel - -ei 1 -6 ts VI! 3. CA 4 COOS M.61.92.1ON Lu � u�lD IIl = . � yyb'I �- s a hO i ! —Lo i a � J , E � - y - i= i �i