15701 75TH PL W (2).PDFIIIIIIIIIIII
15701 75TH PL W
ADDRESS:
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: OV 22I2 YJ O,-2 t 1
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: 1I01d 171II&/ A9-
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DA'
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
PERMITS
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: Z/.
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: G l/-�T' 07
SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc
Y1;
Cj --AITY OF EDMONDS
VREV
-P,;IBLIC WORKS DEPAR
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
CTION CALL • Permit no) _ �o�1l
Ext. 220 Issue Date 011-2715
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
SE P 8 70,70,
1. Address of Construction
2. Property* Legal Description (include all easements) q�,�
1I/fin fii UY
%n NA/}i7M�'I M� . V�' 2 dl/, rS7 �?Dl � d '� C Li/i� W. QQ L
3. Single Family 'Residence v' 'Multi -Family No.� of Units -
Commercial
4. Owner and/or Builder Dww
5. Contractor & License No.
6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No ✓ Yes (If Yes Right-of-
way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (M2°l, N411) before
excavation).
1-800-454-5555
7. Cross other private property: Yes No f/ Easement required -
attach legal description and county easement number.
READ THE FOLLOWING AND SIGN:
a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on
their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to
construct side sewers in the public right-of-way.
b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each
installation for one year.
C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6")
side sewer line.
d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30")
to any structure.
e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade. of 2% (1.15°)
and maximum grade of .100% (450)
f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/81bend) is0allowed
between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8
bend) and wye with removable cap.
g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected
to side sewer system.
h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines
through other than.granular soil.
i. Cleanouts are -required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line
and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. a'
j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original
conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure
due to poor compaction of fill.
k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved
by the City.
1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working
days no ice required.
�
DATE: 2--7 / l7 d'
I —certify that I h "Ve read
and shall comply.
w%th the above
PERMIT FEE:
CONNECTION FEE:
0
PERMIT M1
DISAPPROVED By: Date:
B Date: �
APPROVED By : Date :
N a
T BE POSTED-0l`I JOB 5ITE 41
a
N
lu
C
O
M
W
O
V
O
,s
oEI
rA
J¢
Uw
2g
r�Z
V
Q�
az
o
�v
a
x
H
z
0
V
W
z
�
�
a
9
av
pG
z
'oj
�
o
a
z
?w
o
a
�
a
,A— = -
aC
o
z
o
z
z
pO
F
U
of
rN
44
P
A
w
w
d
A
o
z
v0
c�
a
z
--4
f j
1
f
d
�
4
a: o�3a
,o ou4—
ao, 0;4
�
,C
.1
L
N a
W.
s
O
oa
O
CJ
,� NORTH
0
! ,"ic!, V T` 'fi.6E't 'IQ
. 1. t. t4, t
75 T" PL.ACE
♦
r
IU,SbL-bL
.-CAMPBELL WILL� IAM
MEAUCJWUALE' EACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
BLK 000 0 BEG SE CCR
44
2624 4TH AVENUE NAM
OR =105
OF TR 2 2 S *41 54W ALG S LN OF SO TR
SEATTLE WA
98109
03FT TO POB TH CeNT S88*41 54W ALG SE
'!
s LiJ.238.58FT TH NO 1* 18 OOW 66.16FT TH
N88*42 QOE 64FT TAP ON CRV TC L HAVG RAO
6
140FT TH ALG SO CRV ARC DIST 67.04FT
CONS C/4 OF 27*26 09 TH N61*15 51E 45FT
TAP ON CRV TO R HAVG RAO 120FT TH ALG
SD CRV ARC CIST 52.36FT CONS C/A 25*00
00 TH N86*15 51E 15FT TH 503*44 OSE ALG
WLY MGN 70TH AVE_W 11-6.77Ft TO P08
5133-000-022-2903
70363-82
MEADOWDALE BEACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
NESS-OBERT P
BLK 000 D-29 - BEG SE COR
MCCANIEL JIM114Y 0
OF TR 22 TH S88*41 54W ALG S LN OF 30 T'r'
415 49TH STREET
268.61FIT TO POB TH CONT S88*41 54W ALG
SEATTLE WA
98103
SO S LN 96.79FT TH NO1*29 02W 180.08FT
TH "IJ88*42 24E 121;.38FT TH SO1*17 36E
75.9CFT TH S88*42 OCW 12FT1 TAP CRV CRV
CONCAVE TO NW HAVG Rao 20FT TH ALG SD
CRV CONS ANG OF 90*CO 00 ARC DIST 31.42
FT TH 501*18 QOE 84.16FT- TC POB
133 -000-02 5-0 10 9
121561-79
M E AD'Ow D A L E EAC>-j SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
RUSNAK MICHAEL & BETTY
BLK 00-0 0-0-1 - E 380.73FT CF TRS 25 E 26
15620 `.NO AVENUE
WEST
EOMLA W A NDS
8 0 20
5133-000--)25-0208
41470-74
M EA D G wi) A L E BEACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
CARYL D 11
BLK COO 0-02 --W 200.87FT OF TRS 25 26
15701 75TH PLACE W
LESS W1 1JFT 'Q'C0 6i4/53 TO CITY CF
D MO N D WA
98020
E 0 IM OiN D 5
...........
5133-000-027-0008
102525-62
MEAL)CWD'LE EEACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
—NELSON JNCRM,144N' E
BLK 000 O-OC - ALL TRACT 27
15723 7 5 T H PL
EDMONDIS*t W34
98020
TO 0 - 0 —3I -,'-) 0 0 2
-1 '78 —94- 1-xl
"I E 4]174D A Lle-TE�»Cz-R--S U-P6-CE ME yTAL
BEERS W R F, PAULE
C
BLK 000 O-OC, LOT 31
15306 49TH, W
EOMONOS W,,'
93C2C
S N G H 0 M I S H c 0 u
,,�AS 330SR 1.
.,.,
A S S E S. S
0 R R. E A L-____P:-R--0.-P- ... E -R T --Y --R
--------------------------
0, W N E R% S I P N A."I E STMT
a LEGAL DESCR'l F-1-10N--
-H
A U C I T ply
— ----------------------
5 00-032--0 LOG
15 -54, 6-8 3
ME,4D CWD,l LE EE ACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT
E
NOWAF7
n _11 was ccirllpll0' fer Uca by the MY 01 E, '.I -j
a Th e City of Edmonds do"S not V;,,
ts . tcrth on tile man Any person or CntiY fc'.:"- - j
iry regarding tho
coit,.ubt an independent Innill 1:j,
'v:- T c'.-j
[,'.ZQ.1nc1u.d1ng, but not limited to, the loco, of v Y '. �
S_.� �a, st,,bG may or rnq,�jnt and mzy or rr,:j n
thf: loo-a'ion (;ftloNel the city of Edmonds ncr Its erVO
ar
officars shg be liable for the information on this map, nor for F-riv OM',
representaton provided bused saW ru.,
O
cl
ti
cl
o
_a
�
O
Cd
42
rn
s.
r
W
Cd
S4 'A cz
M-
if
s'f TO AT 1
;'SUBJECT iJ n ,✓�,�„ f/_7 ,�/o. -A /ivIDATE
/,e
DATE SIGNED
4S 474 Redif�rm ® SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBONS INTACT - PART 3 Will BE RETURNED WITH REPLY
DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP
CITY OF EDMADS
ENGINEERIWG DEPARTMENT
250 Fifth Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington
.APPLICATION FOR A SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT'
(Submit 3 Copies)
Permit to be issued toi..-:..b, L. A...-.k....... C19A.Y4.... .... .... . ....... ;...
For installation at: (street address) ............. ... ....... vA..��..-..--....
' � W. a ,47 � >�Rac'i"f .zSdA� � - :,iew7'i�;-•1gt•ary`• ei�...............
Addition or Subdivision. .�!�06,0A W-...Qo,�i•-•--.isp—a6.I�J....�QA1.A�lVQ'.%-....... Lot..............�- Block ................
Type of .Building: New.4.0 0. Existing..--........ Single family residence... ........... • 1l% Number of bedrooms...... ...............
Other: (specify type or use)........................................................................................................................................................
...J�Mi QX.... �!!1,?.1....
..--.�--'�
Builder..�.ir?.� .....JT�.al>rr�.0: ............................... �-•
� r
Designer: LA114.% ...% �.....CAtj .%...............Address/..�63..I......7.-�....P�'...�%!....� e.....
10
Soil Log Hole No. 1..... .R.Q-..1�-......G-.�4.V �.. �..� d t�
t 1 ti
o w N G �V ..-.
SoilLog Hole No. 2...-.R.....-..-........................N.b...............--............-...........-.....-.......:
... ................ ...........
Elevation of:.;.Water Table'if encountered. (Distance from ground surface)/.i/.D...:.tl/�t.l..A�.�.:-..`alT%1�
Corrections to control surface water if needed .......... ................................................ ................... .....:......................................
............................................................................................................-.-..-......-......
r.''. Specify if any removing or grading of topsoil in field area.--------- ............................... .......... .......................
-
x.-:::.. Percolation: 6n pIM.
Test -Hole: No.- 1—Average Rate Sr-_.-._CN..- jC,,; p,., (Fall in minutes/inch-bottoiri. f"'test hole)
. _ ;�%
r :T:li-- lf1 ..:. •lMµ Fall `in minutes inch -bottom 6" test hole
Test Hole 'No. 2 — Average Rate .l�i� / )
4' :✓ n N� Fall in minutes /iinch-bottom 6" test hole
;t Teat Hole No. 3 — Average RateAds.r fir...-/.4(,tIdV C.. � �
Average percolation rate on which to base drain field design 9.4. jVjJV. �(..INA0. Date Taken'!
Septic• tank• requirements based on present rules and regulations:
"Se - i—Tank Size..9Q,Q............gallons.
Amounof Square Fee Disposal Fiel CIO
D
Signature Designer.. .... ......................... ' ate ..7.:. .
'DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
a ; /
) CP-.�. ..--"..,�.�:..............:.Permit Number.....:....... S
• - • Permit issued (date) --.-....... - .................... '
a Remarks. ...............
....... ....
.........................................-........_................................................ ,.............. ;........ ...-.
`&Z 20/ V--0 gv:a-
September 18, 2014
File No. 07-055.100
STREET FILE
PanGE&
1 N C O R P O R A T B D
Geotechnical & Earthquake
Engineering Consultants
SEP 2 2 2014
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Mr. Van Caryl COUNTER
15701— 75t" Place West
Edmonds, Washington 98026-4521
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation
Proposed Grading
15701—.75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. Caryl:
As requested, we are pleased to present this letter summarizing our geotechnical
evaluation for the subject lot. This letter presents the results of our evaluation and
provides our geotechnical recommendations for the proposed grading planned for the
west side of the residence.
We previously prepared a letter dated April 11, 2007 providing geotechnical
recommendations for the construction of a patio in this same area. The patio was not
constructed.
In preparing this letter, we met with you on -site to observe the current site conditions,
reviewed the proposed grading plans and other improvements, and reviewed background
geologic and geotechnical information for the site and vicinity. Our review included
published literature regarding the project site, including summary logs of previous
borings and test pits in the vicinity of the site maintained by the Washington Department
of Natural Resources (https://fortress.wa. ovageology/?Theme=subsurD, and the
North Edmonds Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Summary Report, Edmonds,
Washington (Landau, 2007).
Our services are provided in accordance with the attached General Conditions.
3213 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite B
Seattle, WA 98102
(206)262-0370
FAX (206) 262-0374
Mr. Van Caryl
Geotechnical Evaluation: 15701— 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA
September 18, 2014
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The subject site is located at 15701 — 75th Place West in Edmonds, Washington. The site
is located in a geologic province known as the Meadowdale Landslide Complex, which is
an ancient landslide or paleo-slide. The subject site is situated between 75th Place West
and the steep slope that defines the eastern edge of the landslide complex. This area is
identified as being within Zane B of the landslide complex (Landau, 2007) which has a
potential for large scale slope instability and localized small scale instability. As a result,
we understand the City of Edmonds is requesting a geotechnical assessment to evaluate
the potential impacts of the proposed improvements to the site stability.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The site contains an existing two story, lightly loaded wood frame residence constructed
in 1973. The site and surrounding area slopes down from east to west and the residence
is benched into the natural sloping grade, with the lower level comprised of a daylight
basement. Plates 1 and 2 provide an overview of the site conditions.
At this time it is planned to remodel the interior of the existing residence to create an
accessory dwelling unit comprising the lower, daylight basement level of the residence.
In order to provide access to the lower unit, it is planned to install a door at the location
of a framed window opening on the west side of the residence. The door will require
permanently lowering grades on the west side of the residence by excavating to a depth
of two feet at the west edge of the residence. The depth of excavation will taper to match
existing grade to the west. Approximately 45 cubic yards of soil will be excavated and
removed from the site.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page 2 PanGEO, Inc.
Mr. Van Caryl
Geotechnical Evaluation: 15701— 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA
September 18, 2014
The excavation and soil exporting is expecting to take one day to complete.
A cantilevered second story deck is also planned for the west side of the residence. No
new foundations are planned to support the deck.
SITE RECONNAISSANCE
As part of our study, we returned to the site on September 9, 2014 to conduct a
reconnaissance of the site. The existing residence is situated about 90 feet east of the 75th
Place West right-of-way, with the basement floor about 15 feet above the grade of 75th
Place West. The grade between the residence and the street is terraced; see Plate 1 above,
with an approximately 20 foot wide level lawn area immediately west of the residence.
At the edge of the lawn is a 10 to 12 foot high slope with a gradient of 50 percent. At the
toe of the slope is relatively level gravel parking area at the elevation of 75 h Place West.
East of the residence is an approximately 20 foot wide level yard area, which is bordered
to the east by an approximately 40 foot high slope that ascends to the east at a 50 to 80
percent gradient.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page 3 PanGEO, Inc.
Mr. van Caryl
Geotechnical Evaluation: 15701— 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA
September 18, 2014
In general, the project site and its vicinity are underlain by a sequence of glacial till,
advance outwash sand and gravel, and fine-grained silt and clay. The steep topography
and the presence of groundwater at the sand/gravel and the underlying silt/clay contact is
often the triggering mechanism of past slides.
We understand the residence was constructed in 1973. Observations made during our site
visit suggest that the site has been stable at least since the residence was built, a period of
41 years. Although one minor crack was observed within the concrete stem wall on the
north side of the building, the crack pattern suggests that it was caused by foundation
settlement at the northwest building corner, and is not related to slope movement.
Although the site appears stable at this time, and has been stable since at least 1973 when
the residence was built, the potential for future ground movements cannot be dismissed
because of the site geology, site topography, and the history of previous slope failures in
the vicinity of the site.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Because the proposed changes to the residence will result in lowering grades by as much
as 2 feet and the soils will be removed from the site, in our opinion the proposed changes
should not increase the potential for instability. However, the anticipated volume of soil
removal (45 cubic yards) is relatively small, so the proposed grading is not expected to
improve the site stability either. In summary, for all practical purposes, it is our opinion
that the proposed grading should have no impacts (either positive or negative) on the long
term stability of the site.
The regrading should be designed such that the finished ground surface slopes away from
the top of the west slope. All surface water from new impervious surfaces such as
walkways should be collected and carried by way of a tightline to permanent discharge
facilities.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page 4 PanGEO, Inc.
Mr. Van Caryl
Geotechnical Evaluation: 15701— 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA
September 18, 2014
SEASONAL GRADING RESTRICTION
The City of Edmonds imposes a seasonal grading restriction on earthwork in critical
areas that extends from October 1 through April 30. As the proposed earthwork will only
take one day and is limited to the excavation and exporting of soils, in our opinion the
earthwork can take place during the grading restriction period, provided the following
mitigation measures are implemented:
• The earthwork should be timed to occur during a period when there will be an
extended period of predictable, dry weather. In no case should earthwork should
be conducted during periods of precipitation.
• The soils generated by the excavation should be loaded directly into a truck and
exported. In no case should soils be temporarily stockpiled in the work area or at
the top of the west slope.
• After the grading is completed, the exposed surface should be covered with at
least three inches of straw mulch.
STATEMENT OF RISK
As required by the City of Edmonds, the following Statement of Risk is made:
a. Structural Plan Review: The proposed regrading does not include any structural .
elements. .
b. Increased Risk: The proposed regrading involves lowering grades in the lawn
area west of the residence, reducing the weight at the top of the west slope and
reducing driving forces for future instability. As a result, the proposed
improvements are not anticipated to increase the risk of slope instability.
Provided that proper erosion control measures are implemented during
construction and surface water drainage is controlled on a permanent basis, in our
opinion that the risk of damage to the property or adjacent properties as a result of
the planned improvements will be minimal. However, the word "minimal" does
not imply no risk. Development in a landslide or steep slope area always involves
some risk.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page 5 PanGEO, Inc.
Mr. Van Caryl
Geotechnical Evaluation: 15701— 756' Place West, Edmonds, WA
September 18, 2014
c. Probability of slope movements: Based on our subjective judgment, which is in
part based on the stability of the site during at least the last 41 years and the
setback distance from the street and the bluff fronting Puget Sound, it is our
opinion that the probability of ground subsidence at the site is less than about 10%
in the next 25 years. However, it should also be noted that the site stability could
also be impacted by factors beyond one's control, including extreme weather
conditions and off -site construction activities.
We trust the information presented herein meets your need at this time. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely,
PanGEO, Inc.
e°t Wash
h
90
to Engineerina 0ro �.
�c 212 `q
d Ge°\O
Scott D. Dinkelman
Scott D. Dinkelman, LEG
Senior Engineering Geologist
Attachment: General Conditions
Siew L. Tan, P.E.
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page 6 PanGEO, Inc.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
PanGEO, Inc., a Washington Corporation ("PanGEO?), and Client agree to a work assignment in accordance with the attached proposal and cost
estimate, and the following general conditions.
INTEGRATION
The attached proposal together with these General Conditions comprises the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement may not be
changed without the prior written consent of all parties to the Agreement. There are no terns or conditions that are not expressed in this
Agreement.
STANDARD OF CARE
PanGEO agrees to perform its professional services in accordance with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by similarly qualified
geotechnical engineering professionals currently practicing in this area under similar conditions. No warranties or other representations are
expressed or implied.
CLIENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND OBLIGATIONS
The Client is responsible to provide PanGEO with a description of the property, its location, and the locations of any underground utilities,
facilities or structures on or adjacent to the property that could impact our work. PanGEO, its owners, employees, subcontractors and agents will
not be responsible for any damage to buried utilities or subterranean structures that are not specifically identified to PanGEO. The Client also
must advise PanGEO of the location and nature of any known or suspected hazardous materials that may exist on the property.
SITE ACCESS/RIGHT OF ENTRY
The Client agrees to advise PanGEO, prior to commencement of our services, of any special requirements for entry, work permits, security
clearances, licenses, or any other required permissions. ff the property is not owned by the Client, the Client shall obtain permission for right -of -
entry for the purpose of performing our services.
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DISTURBANCE
PanGEO will take reasonable precautions to minimize surface and subsurface disturbance of the site. In the normal course of exploratory work
some disturbance may occur, and the restoration of any disturbance is not part of this Agreement, unless specifically provided in the scope of
services and budget for the work.
UNANTICIPATED CONDITIONS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Subsurface conditions at some locations at the site may vary from those encountered at the locations where surveys or explorations are made.
Because the interpretations and recommendations of PanGEO are based solely on the information available to PanGEO, limitations on the
available information will result in some uncertainty, and, therefore, risk, with respect to the interpretation of geologic and geotechnical
conditions, despite the use of due professional care. If conditions different from those described in our report are observed or appear to be
present, PanGEO should be retained to provide additional analyses as necessary to evaluate the situation and modify our recommendations as
appropriate.
The discovery of unanticipated conditions or hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition that may require renegotiation of the scope of
services and budget, or termination of services. If unanticipated hazardous materials are encountered, PanGEO may take immediate action to
protect health and safety. PanGEO shall notify Client as soon as practically possible should unanticipated hazardous materials be encountered.
Client agrees to compensate PanGEO for the additional cost of services necessary to protect the health and safety of the public, PanGEO's
employees, or others.
INDEMNIFICATION FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND RELEASE OF POLLUTANTS
Client agrees that any hazardous materials, including asbestos, present at the work site, prior to and during the performance of this Agreement
were not generated, stored or disposed of by PanGEO. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Client shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless PanGEO, its owners, employees, subcontractors and agents, from any and all liability, loss, costs, damage or expenses (including
attorneys' fees and costs upon trial and appeal) arising out of or in connection with (1) any future pollution -related claims or damages at the site,
including potential claims from third parties that may name PanGEO as a defendant, and (2) the performance of any professional services of
PanGEO that result in alleged exacerbation of existing environmental pollution or contamination, or result in any newly caused or created
pollution or contamination. This indemnification will not apply to claims, damages, losses or expenses which are a result of negligent acts by
PanGEO under this Agreement, or which arise from new pollutants introduced solely by PanGEO.
REPORTING OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RELEASES
The Client is responsible for reporting releases of hazardous substances when such reports are required by government agencies. The Client
agrees to defend and hold PanGEO harmless for government or third party action taken for Client's failure to comply with hazardous substance
release reporting requirements.
JOB SITE CONDUCT AND SAFETY
PanGEO will be responsible for its professional activities on the job site. This will not relieve the Client, Owner, or construction contractors of
their obligation to maintain a safe job site. Neither PanGEUs professional activities nor the presence of its employees nor subcontractors shall be
construed to imply responsibility for job site safety.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page A-1 PanGEO, Inc.
SAMPLE RETENTION AND DISPOSAL
Non -hazardous samples will be discarded 30 days after they are obtained unless prior arrangements are made to store or deliver the samples.
Samples containing hazardous materials that are regulated under federal, state, or local environmental laws will be returned to the site.
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
Reports, field data, laboratory data, analyses, calculations, estimates, designs and other documents prepared by PanGEO as instruments of service
shall remain the property of PanGEO. PanGEO will retain pertinent records relating to the services performed for a period of ten years following
submission of the report. Copies of the instruments of service will be made available to the Client on request at a reasonable fee. Reuse of any
instruments of service by the Client on extensions of this project or on other projects without PanGEO's written permissions will be at the
Client's sole risk. Client agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless PanGEO from claims, damages and expenses arising out of such reuse.
BILLING AND PAYMENT
Billing for services will be submitted upon completion of the geotechnical engineering report. A service charge of one and one-half percent
(1.5%) per month will be added to unpaid accounts due over 60 days. Expenses incurred in preparation and/or foreclosure of any lien or
collecting delinquent amounts including, but not limited to attorneys' fees, costs at trial and appeal and charges for PanGEO's staff time shall be
paid in addition to the delinquent amount.
TERMINATION OF SERVICES
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon at least seven (7) days written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party
to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions through no fault of the terminating party. Such termination shall not be effective if that
substantial failure has been remedied before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. In the event that the Client requests early
termination of our services, PanGEO reserves the right to complete such analyses and records as are necessary to place its files in order and
complete a report on the services performed to date. Charges for these termination activities shall be in addition to all charges incurred up to the
date of termination.
INSURANCE
PanGEO maintains Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance as required by state laws. PanGEO also maintains
comprehensive general, auto, professional and environmental liability insurance, certificates of which are available upon request.
LIMIT OF LIABILITY
General Liability: In the performance of this Agreement and subject to the limits, terms and conditions of property damage and public liability
coverage, PanGEO agrees to indemnify and hold Client harmless from PanGEO's proportional share of liability resulting from its negligence and
any breech of contract compared to that of other persons or entities which results in damage to the Client. PanGEO shall not be responsible for
any loss, damage, or liability beyond the amounts, limits, coverage or conditions of its insurance coverage on the date the claim is made.
PanGEO shall not be responsible for Client's negligence nor the negligence of third parties.
Professional Liability: In consideration of relative opportunities for financial reward from this project for the parties to this Agreement, Client
agrees that the maximum aggregate amount of its recovery from PanGEO or its employees due to any and all claims of professional negligence
and breach of contract arising out of any incident shall be limited to $50,000 or the amount of PanGEO's fees for the services provided under this
Agreement, whichever is less, unless a higher limit with commensurate compensation is specifically negotiated.
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
PanGEO shall not be liable for consequential damages, including loss of use or loss of profits, or indirect damages, regardless of whether such
claim is based upon alleged breach of contract, willful misconduct, strict liability, breach of warranty or negligent act, error or omission, whether
professional or nonprofessional.
DISPUTES
Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or breach thereof, shall be mediated. The law of the State of
Washington will govern the validity and execution of this Agreement and the disposition of any claims related to this Agreement. The prevailing
party in any dispute or litigation concerning this Agreement will be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred at trial and
appeal, including staff time, court costs, attorneys' fees, and other claim -related expenses.
ASSIGNMENTS
Neither the Client nor PanGEO may delegate, assign, sublet or transfer the duties, interests or responsibilities set forth in this agreement without
the written consent of the other party.
SURVIVAL
These terms and conditions shall survive the completion of the services under the Agreement and the termination of the Agreement for any cause
SEVERABILITY
The Client and PanGEO have entered into this Agreement of their own free will, to communicate to one another mutual understandings and
responsibilities. Any element of the Agreement later held to violate a law or regulation shall be deemed void, and remaining provisions shall
continue in force. Client and PanGEO shall in good faith attempt to replace any invalid or unenforceable provision with one that is valid and
enforceable, and which comes as close as possible to expressing the intent of the original provision.
07-055.100 15701-75th Ave W Page A-2 PanGEO, Inc.
City of Edmonds
Critical Area Notice of Decision
Applicant:
'
Property Owner:
C"
Critical Area File #:
o
Permit Number:
13 Lt a 16�
Site Location:
"
Parcel Number:
Project Description:
AD 0 C G ,
v
❑ Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
l . There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer.
2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or
23.80.040.
3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to. ECDC 23.40.230.
❑ Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
E]"C—ritical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
1The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
on or off the development proposal site;
The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. ✓ Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40.110, Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
6. '� The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
►1e ems _ L) 1 -7 -� y
eviewer Signature Date
Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the
requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 1211612010
PLANNING DATA
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
STREET FILE
Name:
Date:
Site Address:
_ � = Q S
Tax Parcel 0 0!; 330000 a
Project Description: 1 ���-'' TJ�� re w�oc
Plan Check #:
LI c�OIL Ulm
Reduced Site Plan Provided: YE NO)
Zoning: �S _ >- v
Map Page:
Corner Lot: (YES 0
Flag Lot: (YES /
Critical Areas Determination #: 6 a b
,1"rStudy Required
❑ Waiver
SEPA Determination:
Exempt
❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading)
❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form
Required Setbacks .
Street: S
Sid?: 3S
Sidle: 3 / D
Rear: ,r--
Actual Setbacks
Street: f O
Side: L
Side: L
Rear: j
❑ Detached Structure:,
Rockeries:
❑ Fences/Trellises:
❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation:
❑ Stairs Deck:
Bui/din Hei ht
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:
Maximum Height Allowed:
Actual Height:
Other
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Lot Area: 3 a
Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: o
Lot Coverage Calculations: v
g i S s- a7s 5-9 3/
ADU Created: YE / NO) -FL-N D-p N o
Subdivision:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / )
Comments
Plan Review By: CV - M-
Planning Data Forth 07-1409.doc
PLANNING DATA
1
ST7�gT'ELE'
J
0
is
Plan Review By:
Planning Data Form 07-14-09.doc
TELEPHONE/COUNTER
CONVERSATION RECORD
DATE: - TIME: At, FILE: /5-7d
wip, M a I RFQ
S
STGEET FILE
0-1
0006.
WSS/naa
06/13/86
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
We, Delmar H. Caryl and Mary M. Caryl, of Edmonds,
Washington, applicants for a Building Permit to construct a
garage on our property at 15701 75th Place West, in
consideration of the review of said permit and its issuance
through a requested waiver from the Building Official do hereby
stipulate and promise as follows:
1. Acknowledgment of Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard.
We hereby acknowledge that we have been fully informed by
the City of Edmonds that our property, for which a Building
Permit has been requested, lies within an area designated by the
City as an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, and have
been presented with copies of reports by Roger Lowe and
Associates regarding said hazard and the 1985 update of said
report by GeoEngineers, Inc. We are aware of the hazards
attributable with building on said property and the potential for
the loss of our investment in any structures built under the
requested Building Permit. We recognize the risks and have
requested a waiver from the soil analysis and the foundation
design provisions of City ordinance because the requested
structure is incidental to our main residence, will not impose an
additional burden increasing any hazard on our property and
because such structure is minor in nature and not of significant
value when compared with the other structures on the site.
2. Promise to Inform.
In consideration of the City's grant of Building Permit and
waiver from provisions requested above, we promise, on behalf of
ourselves, our heirs, successors and assigns, to inform any
future purchaser of the property from us, of the existence of the
Roger Lowe report and current and future updates of said report,
to fully inform said purchasers of the potential for earth
subsidence and landslide hazard.
3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless Provision.
We promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of
Edmonds, its officials, employees and agents from any and all
liability of any kind or nature arising from or out of the
issuance of a Building Permit to construct a garage on our
property at 15701 75th Place West. This promise to indemnify
and hold harmless is intended to cover any and all claim or loss
�iNlo�
U�nal�e� laead2 0AW �Om oFdoe�in P�+P1evU.h� 2errrd� o�
" rvm!r 4 ,
s�aEE7 NIA •
of whatever kind or nature whatsoever arising from the issuance
of the Building Permit and our construction in accordance
therewith, provided, however, that nothing herein shall be
interpreted to require us to indemnify the City from its sole
negligence.
DONE this � day of 1986.
READ CAREFULLY,
CONTAINS INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION
DELMAR H. CARYL
MARU M. CA
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
On this / 7 day of ,c,� �-�� 1984 before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Pubb—fin and for he State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared to me known to be
the individualA/ described in and who executed the for eg ing instrument, and ,
acknowledged to me thathe signed and sealed the said instrument as�
free and voluntary act and M ed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
WITNESS my hand, and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate
above .written.
JA �UELINEPARRETT
44Y Commission Expires NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington,
January 25, 1990 residing at Edmonds
Indemnification & Hold Harmless Agreement — 2
"I
— Q5
9
ITREET FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5TH AVE N • EDMOPJDS W/• lwo 2n • (^ni;) 771 7'02
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering
August 22, 1989
Mr. Del Caryl
1570175th Place W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Mr. Caryl:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
NIAYOn
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
I have thought about your proposal, and I think it has merit. It is my opinion, as well as staffs, that a preliminary
investigation such as you described could possibly be helpful in convincing buyers that the property is developable.
I also think that you should point out to prospective buyers the houses that have been constructed under the
Meadowdale procedures -- for example, the Thiry house which is almost directly across the street from you -- and
empahsize that a number of submittals are presently being prepared for a full application to the City. I realize your
experience was frustrating, but I don't think you need to be discouraged.
If you were to retain a geotechnical consultant, you would give him the Meadowdale packet and ask him how far he
could go with it short of having an actual house and site plan. He should be able to define the parameters and
conditions which would govern the construction of a house. These parameters might include, but not be limited to, the
actual building pad, foundation techniques which would work, de -watering measures which would be needed, and
other conditions which are sufficiently generic for any house plan that a prospective buyer might want. In fact, this is
pretty much the sequence that anyone would be following in accordance with the Meadowdale procedures. If you
wish, the City could at a nominal cost give you a copy of a report which was done for another applicant.
You might even go so far as to have your consultant stipulate that, given certain conditions, he sees no reason why a
house cannot be built in accordance with the City's requirements. Obviously, conditions carry costs, and a prospective
buyer needs to understand that this is not a simple flat lot. Perhaps a preliminary cost estimate for site work and
special foundations might be a part of your study. By the way, we don't typically make recommendations as to
consultants, but we can certainly give you names of ones who have done this work.
This preliminary study is your document. The City makes no judgement whatsoever as to its validity or as to the
eventual application for an actual building permit. At a time when an actual application is made, the City will evaluate
the entire submittal -- including the geotechnical report -- and then hopefully issue a building permit if all the
conditions and requirements in the Meadowdale packet are met satisfactorily. The complete submittal will, of course,
include all the documents, covenants, and other requirements of the Meadowdale ordinance and procedures.
I hope this is of some assistance to you. I wish you luck and if you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to
call Mary Lou Block, the Planning Manager.
Sincerely,
Peter Hahn
f.caryl l
• Incorporated August 11, 1890 •
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
• STREET FILE •
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206( 7713202
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation e Engineering
August 22, 1989
Mr. Del Caryl
1570175th Place W.
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Mr. Caryl:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
I have thought about your proposal, and I think it has merit. It is my opinion, as well as staffs, that a preliminary
investigation such as you described could possibly be helpful in convincing buyers that the property is developable.
I also think that you should point out to prospective buyers the houses that have been constructed under the
Meadowdale procedures -- for example, the Thiry house which is almost directly across the street from you -- and
empahsize that a number of submittals are presently being prepared for a full application to the City. I realize your
experience was frustrating, but I don't think you need to be discouraged.
If you were to retain a geotechnical consultant, you would give him the Meadowdale packet and ask him how far he
could go with it short of having an actual house and site plan. He should be able to define the parameters and
conditions which would govern the construction of a house. These parameters might include, but not be limited to, the
actual building pad, foundation techniques which would work, de -watering measures which would be needed, and
other conditions which are sufficiently generic for any house plan that a prospective buyer might want. In fact, this is
pretty much the sequence that anyone would be following in accordance with the Meadowdale procedures. If you
wish, the City could at a nominal cost give you a copy of a report which was done for another applicant.
You might even go so far as to have your consultant stipulate that, given certain conditions, he sees no reason why a
house cannot be built in accordance with the City's requirements. Obviously, conditions carry costs, and a prospective
buyer needs to understand that this is not a simple flat lot. Perhaps a preliminary cost estimate for site work and
special foundations might be a part of your study. By the way, we don't typically make recommendations as to
consultants, but we can certainly give you names of ones who have done this work.
This preliminary study is your document. The City makes no judgement whatsoever as to its validity or as to the
eventual application for an actual building permit. At a time when an actual application is made, the City will evaluate
the entire submittal -- including the geotechnical report -- and then hopefully issue a building permit if all the
conditions and requirements in the Meadowdale packet are met satisfactorily. The complete submittal will, of course,
include all the documents, covenants, and other requirements of the Meadowdale ordinance and procedures.
I hope this is of some assistance to you. I wish you luck and if you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to
call Mary Lou Block, the Planning Manager.
Sincerely,
Peter Hahn
f.caryll
• Incorporated August 11. 1890 •
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
STREO FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771.3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES
March 5, 1987
Delmar .Caryl
15701 75th P1 W
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Permit Number: 860420
Date Issued: 6/17/86
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
This letter is to advise you that Building Division records do not
indicate recent inspections for the subject building permit. If no
progress has been made on construction, please advise the Building
Division so appropriate notation can be made in your file.
The initial building permit is valid for one year. If your project has
not been completed within the year a renewal is required. Please call
the Building Division for more information.
If you are ready for final project approval please call "Inspections"
at 771-3202 to schedule an appointment.
Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
Last Inspection Date 7/10/86
Sincerely,
Jeannine L. Graf
Permit Coordinator
t G--
J�l�/�9� - /r� _ w%�4 � opt TSfj9�✓o/ry S �
/• fIN4L EL�GlX.fCl4 L L�/SPeGrza.,/
Z_ /gw4otvC& TNS�EGTlCYI/
w'v -o-// 171-r-
7Q C104,r--
PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING • PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
C]
STREOT FILE
CITY OF E O M O N O S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
250 5th AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
June 11th, 1986
Mr. Scott Synder
Ogden, Ogden & Murphy
2300 Westin Building
2001 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98121
Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Caryl
of 15701 75th Place West requesting a waiver from
Council's requirements for construction on the
Meadowdale Landslide.
Please review and advise me whether or not we can
approve conventional construction in the landslide area.
UAOA04 0,04-Q�
Harold Reeves
Building Official
cc: Mr. & Mrs. Caryl
Enclosure
HR: j lg
PUBL:C WORKS PLANNING PARKS AND RECREATION ENGINEERING
STREET li-Ift
Harold Reeves
Edmonds Building Department
Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr.Reeves,
Edmonds, Washington
June' 10, 1966
I have studied the provisions of the special requirements of the
Meadowdale Drainage Area document from your office, and have concluded
that the requirements listed are redundant, out -dated and not applicable
to the small project we are seeking a Permit for. Subsequent to the
inclusion of our property in the Roger Loire Landslide Hazard Repot't, we have
obligated ourselves to a S10,000 sewer and drainage improvement project
which is working beautifully.
I am hereby requesting a waiver to the special requirements of the
Meadowdale Drainage Area document as they pertain to a 22 x 30 ft. garage
that I would like to construct on my property at 15701 75th P1. 71.
The building plans, on file in your office, have been scrutinized by
Allen Morgan# of Reid, Middleton, the Engineering firm most familiar with
the Meadowdale area. His suggestions have been incorpolated into the final
plans. I can assure you that we have .excellent plans that will be executed
on a stable, slide —free site.
In order to minimize the City's liability, my wife and I would be
pleased to submit a legal hold -harmless agreement as part of the Building
Permit process in whatever form the City Attorney suggests.
After residing on the site in question for more than 40 years, we are
fully aware of the landslide hazards, and accept the full responsibility
for any damage incurred by structures owned by us. There are no lenders
or mortgages involved in the financing of this structure.
We would appreciate it if the city would expedite the permit process for
this minor project.
Respectfully,
Mr. & Mrs. Delmar H. Caryl
15701 75th Pl. ff.
Edmonds, -:JA 98020
Phone: 743-0876
BUILDING
JUN 10 1986
STREET
Dan Rivera
Danco Construction Co.
8207 224th St. S. !1.
Edmonds, Wk 98020
Dear Dan;
FILE 0
Edmonds, Washington
May 21, 1986
I went to the Edmonds Building Dept this morning to start the
procedure for obtaining a Building Permit to add a 22-30 ft. garage
to our existing dwelling.
Since our property is located in the North 14eadowdale "Slide Area",
Mr.. Hal Reeves had some condern regarding the City's liability in the
event of a future slide.
I took our preliminary building plans to Reid, Middleton, the
Edmonds Engineering firm most familiar with the Meadowdale area, and
went over them with Allen Dorgan. His only suggestion was the addition
of two inches of crushed rock and a layer of 4—mil visqueen under the
slab to minimize possible dampness. I would suggest that we revise
the plans to include Mr. Morgan's suggestions.
In order to minimize the City's liability, my wife and I would be
pleased to submit a legal hold —harmless agreement as a part of the
Building Permit procedure in accordance with whatever the City Attorney
suggests.
After residing on the site in question for more titan 40 years, we
are fully aware of the landslide hazards, and accept the full responsi—
bility for any damage incurred by the structures owned by us or our
heirs. Ve would appreciate it, if the City would expedite the permit
process for this minor project.
Mr. & Mrs. Delmar H.
15701 75th Pl. ?d.
Edmonds, ;'JA 98020
Tel: 743-0876
BU1LDIN
MAY 27 1986
Caryl
Signed:
STRAT FILE •
FILE # n/a
FORM FOR (PIaJ MEWFINAL) DECLARATION OF (UROdMA"NONSIGNIFICANCE)
Description of proposal 499 cubic yards of fill
Proponent Delmar H. Caryl
Location of Proposal 15701 75th P1. W.
Lead Agency City of Edmonds
This proposal has been determined to Oahwjnot have) a significant adverse
impact upon the environment. An EIS (Wis not) required under
RCW.43.21C.030(2)(c) This decision was made after review by the lead
agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on
file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Duane V. Bowman
Position/Title Assist
Date May 9, 1984 Signature
z
` ` l
1
c
�R MVP 4VAY
FILE W n/a
FORM FOR ()PPZPtSWFINAL) DECLARATION OF (MMUMUNONSIGNIFICANCE)
Description of proposal 499 cubic yards of fill
Proponent Delmar H. Caryl
Location of Proposal 15701 75th P1 W
Lead Agency City of Edmonds
This proposal has been determined to ObWAWnot have) a significant adverse
impact upon the environment. An EIS OWis not) required under
RCW.43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead
agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on
file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Duane V. Bowman
Position/Title Assistant
..Date May 9, 1984 Signature
TO File
FORM 41 - LITTLE'S
INT\-y-,,-OFFICE COMM�.IICAT► - NS
STREET FILE DATE August 2819 7
I FROM Bill Nims
SUBJECT: 15701 75th Place W. - Sewage Disposal Permit
An inspection was made on 8/22/72 of the septic tank installation,.;
distribution box, and absorption field.
The septic tank was installed per City Code. The distribution b6x
will create equal flow in all pipes. The absorption fields, trenches,
pipe bedding 6 pipe cover are in accordance with City Standards. The
pipe installed is type 2C286 crushed drain line 600# 4".
I recommend approval of this installation.
WV) copy csko-uuo 1-r @ srTe�� o� j'&-7&► 1,-r
TR AIL -�
- -- --
- -- — „� 72cr.- - — --- -- — - ,
-
---
-
,caN N�
UV
7-1
-
C, /.0__2
WCT.^E: NO WAN, `,I Y OF ACOUP.Ph informatics s''--in C!
an c:rtsuRants. The City of Edmonds does net �;r,rr�.,•..,
------------ --__-- a-tyt �r�' forth or• ttie.map Any per. n'or.ntity re
sh...:.: conduct an indepenaiihN Ouiry
the rco, including, but not limited to, t e ocatien of ny
.-----------shc:rt:-Suctrse.r:erstubs-mayor-may-nnt-exiZ.t—_.^_-_-_-.:—_—__.__._—
the location shown, Neither thr• City of Edmonds ncr its erolcf.._' cr
shall be liable for the informati-o-n-gtveu on this map, nor for cnv on ,
representation provided based ----- sad m,J .—__- ___
10/11/20141:24:21 PM
c
o
a ,
-T� m
i
r� my
m
JJJJm"""""'' 0
* m
E
0
06= r-
> >
o jma D
mWZA-
m O
m
m
�j
G�7
mOm
1�9
m�
Gi
Mm=
)
D
vz0a
,..pp
Dim
m
mNmz
H.
D
.'9q��p.Zm1
yyT`a
'y
q
� N
xozsp
-am
�.
g N
�t N
-
`°
yam
Omx
MMz
�00
v0
m
m ORo�
a
o
�
w6
m
=�
o
zDAO�
(�
c
m
.�
^
� O
$
z0-4
4�ppm
�n
f1
m�m�
c
a��
C m
(n A
pm?
m Z
mO2
m
me
m
f .
Dy
Kyv�
Z�
can
,Tl -n
m
m
ti
oon
on
o
I
a
OS
D
m-•G 0
ern
5�'ka
c
gN
nyv
m y
�
m�oz
n 22
�
Gl III
m�
D
O
y2T
fn
mS.
al.
m
m
w
N
G)
l
T T TNT T TNT T
y
Q�'
... _. - -. -. ..
...
m
F
A'Ab4
Vl
t
AJ .
w u
'
u
Hzo*
<
0.-
t-�
o
z
< Z.
00
ui
ow
8;
r-
z
V2
cw.,
off
w--.
Ni
Z. �o
0
:5
E
50
U-
w
w
-
0 'w
ioag
Z
g ZW3
MI Z
Z
Li
U=,)
C;
z
-W 2
w
ol
1. �
5 �
t=;0=
io;f
21
8
0 w
x
m o
z
z a m
�
ffi W
<
P
M
uj
CL
K 0
w
- a
��q
.�-gn
0
w ,
2 W
QZ
<
0 a
Lu
w
z
CL
z
<
W
p
ff