Loading...
15706 75TH PL W (2).pdfr t,� job Nr kA k�l awe► MM CITY OF EDMONDS FILE # V BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATE ! APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FEE $25.00 REC'T # b -6 HEARING DATE: 3 - APPLICANT: j%r)ffCg 5. owInvLf ADDRESS / 90U7_-,&rA. / ��N��HONE: 2' -S , Indicate type or degree of interest in the property:__ QWiV g Q OtJiIERfe�t�ilra��Bettt t�v�NtAT+ ADDRESSpf'of? �.3�v4t �I. Lyt'v,vlNy�p® PHOidE: -774 LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) /�'7©� �' � St/l P.L. W. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: r.4 Akz& e1g of S %.2 ki d T A . /i USE ZONE:" V ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRETIE T: ♦ . VARIANCE REQUESTED: STATE14ENT O,F,�JJCONDITIO ATTACHED: )fit/ i9s.61.6 LL(ila UL�UMFI1UN UILG rf-- By Planning Department o7iU 5�• 7 a OF 4 na uxj.a I7y2 . A 96M QUEST, IN-%CCCORDANCE 4JITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA • L .e_.. r,'-h-, V I AA T�`EIJ HINGTOP Ss. � _ COUNTY OF S;IOHOitISH � igna ure of Appl i Own ant, er or Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned ?Notary PubTi in and f Ve M o 'Washington, duly conmiissioned and sworn, personally anneared wl�o, being duly sworn, on his/her- oath deposes and says that (s)he has p epared rea tie fo - going statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained t rein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her frec and `v 1untar/ act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me thics ,__,__today" f notary Publ c d he State of Washington. Q--_. WAM 1 ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in thevicinityunder the identical zone classification. /�J /�. J.. B "I' r ?�i,/,0 if !e .. Kd29 ,L A s w _ . ' - . - e &, .../ / 9 "., , - :/' t.t_�_. i •�� ..1..a.. ram.; ,_ _.. �, • - �. "berd POINT 2 Theliarianc am req esting will not etWimental to the PliblioDWel fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in which my property is located because: OIN If this varianc_ is not grant n unnecessary hardship will continue to the owner of this proper e cause which is beyond his control because: (... POINT So as not grantya al p ivile e to by he ing of this '`°• i variance I submit the following conditions to be i os so as no ause in- consistencies with the limitations upon other proper in the vi in,, and zone in which I am located. .._. a :+''r � ,i /. �i .� �.?..•....� t • - ,�:..•.: / i t j , . 'I r Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Adjustment The Bo d of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of k&z/� ,File No. �1�,request for variance at / the following: 1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are in the file. r_ 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met. t 3. In addition thereto, 4. Therefore, the request for variance is Denied/Granted, subject to the following special conditions: '! 5. Sectibn 12.16.110 "----and if a building permit and/or occupancy Fx-,rmit is not obtained for the subject jiroperty within one year from the date of the Board's decision, the con- ditional use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void.---" 6. Decision shall be effective on: Uate . h DATED: Chairman, Board of Adjustment DATA Date of Application: Date of hearing: Date of Publication: ' -z ' 7 1 Continuances:, Date of Posting: Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board: Secretary, Board of Adjustment CITY OF EDHOND5 , FILE # BOARD OF ADjUSTNEJT 1 eJ►s�ort APPLICATION FOR VP,RIArICE FEE_ $25.00 '< RE C' T # _20 HEARING DATE: APPLICANT:&/% Klt4 C%/ o ��/DD„ESS HONE: Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: o 011iJER: ,y,�,q'jDRESS: PHONE: LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:��� /1%D.e'fL �,� �� �,- J��-•� ��` �!��.�.-._ ;i rfx7~S oay4F 3� 7`�i4T�al'7j�i 'tom ✓,ssc,s f �/ F ,�f > „� 7s wesT s-�c� EGAL DES RIPTI'Oc C! CI:ED & APPROVEa USE ZONE: s_, a.,s�4J!`�G�.F,,,� y�' '_ _gyp sgrd /mys ,.�y planning Department ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:` tt VARIANCE REQUESTED:1�V.s�� sty z � 7 �f =` STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ATTACHED: 7'/C�. ��.t'E .e�V 4��G✓iwJg S�`D.s'i r -� �s/o �07� .��.c�,ryJ�..�'1� :�.�..�h.'r,�/ ��_•��!`?� Gj% J°��- l'lr,C'r'�,'-a.�7` z-.�',,E_v�.71� 7'L / C.. iCdJc'.��/ o, 5 s/[JtXCJ 1� -c sir --_ ? `y� tea.✓ �a iry r iibbe��.r1i, v 9 S ............................... STATE Of/WASHINGTOIN) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) nnaa re p 1 'cant, Owner or Representati ve /of On this date, before me the undersigned, a Plot Publicni -an , for th state of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared �t being duly sworn, on his/ oath deposes and says that (s)he has ��,re- cam, statem nts and has acknowledged to that dare etrue, rre the recitations contained therein and has. signed this instrument as his/4el- free and voluntary act and deed for the: purposes therein mcntioned. Subsc(ibc-d and sworn to before me this day of litcy _ ;_ residing a ��uL ._ Notary ib �c i a or^ the State of !Jashirrgton. 5 t •. ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT POINT I. The following are the special circums'•.ances which apply to my property which deprive me of rights and privileges which ,ire enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under the identical zone classification. �y �Y � sf',�.s�•'t' .�r� u��s'F,�if+��s car 11i%2 G > F,*KX s�c%� of- POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel- fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in which my property is located because: %�►��' , ,ski /% �f &e2 5P9&_ /' 6:2? iy,�1/ G 4i}f �4Z r ds�� �,oe yid c 1 w //fool" d� e6 r s .� I ZVI f— GdCY�/rG�i!/S' a7 7Ti r �O%rr / ✓ C�%�OS' Tl.9,troir� �fica�/ / .�vt,/�.�s% �osss�a/F� .ar�.r�.�}ti,� v� �• .��� ,•�rr..9 it �`���is�5 � �..�.r , ,4SSs 55t el y --JE .rJ.4o r�a� .yf�� �,n�rf t �rr� �.�i/ r <,r� s ���,�fio.✓ . POINT 3. If this variance is not granted; an unnecessary hardship will continue to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because: ,�" G.F'fi w,// 6F .,>� /�!..��y y'c c6s7�/_��_��h'' �+ Y 5E?` 6,�7c�t'�S�y...s-�.:�a�.w.�`S • s71,-,IeX4. . _ 7D/'f F,�r,s�ia� �yrl�-/.s��,o.J ,rf/ �s 6t'G:d6.-9,�c-..t�/��,. oLy�•s�t;!/E. 7b ,�'�ifY 7�/,E.. i E.✓�r nls iv .�ffr�oo'c /.may .p is/�i c " 1 "'.0s Gcl , POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in- consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which I am located. ..,�'�rs � �.Ji/of zr �-���`—�.�'T�,a4�aa_�_ os��,�.r�.a..�os�� ,rfiyr�` .��✓{/ G''�'"/'' ¢�.�� Z � " rx f4� airy f..� � �.7�' o.�� fi�� �,•,= s� / �.c s � y` •�1c-n�.J7` _ s,�.�. o��/F /G7`. I_1-�=--•(l-t�.K/.,¢1s'GG� DiY Ti4 S1 .�.t�/1—T��l�1L i_,/7 A ,�til�//'��'!6/r,T.D`�.rrL,zr� .Sr�.PGj�/%G%�'E.� r Record of Findings of Fact by Board of AdL sa*nt The Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of P TA� t�:v `"v.�.�J+�� ,File N o . L l 3-- -7 7 , request for variance at the following: t; 1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are in the file. 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met. f 3. In addition thereto, r 4. Therefore, the request for variance is w3/Granted, subject to the following special conditions: 7u: 5. Section 12.16.110 "----and if a building permit and/or occupancy Mrmit is not obtained for the subject property within one year from the date of the Board's decision, the con- ditional use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void.--- 6. Decision shall be effective on: '9 f (Date)o DATED: 6111'I �, c C airman, Board of Adjus t DATA Date of Appl i cation: Date of Nearing:_______ Date of Publication: Continuances: Date of Posting: Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board:_�� Secretary, Board of Adjustment r r. .�I77) t � e yJ M M[ f 7 i E I. i j r , i 9 All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the 16th day of March 19 77 , has been set as the date•for hearing petition filed by Patrick J. Quinlan for a variance - xxscat )WxwMxxMW)P8r AAx of 7-1/2' from required_ 25' side yard setback; and Variance from Section 12.15.110 regarding ! enlargements of non -conforming buildings at 15706-75th Place North said property being zoned RS-20 a�txk��t,�ocl�gocxi�tk�cx5ocbcl�ow.s�c t 1 j %j Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the. Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds FILE N0: V-13-77 PUBLISH: 3-2-77 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH f THOMAS J. COAD, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is the Publisher of the EDMONDS TRIBUNE -REVIEW, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and has been designated as such by Court Order No. 38292, and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications herein- after referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, and that it was of general circulation in said Snohomish County That the annexed is a true copy of a Notice Qf HA ring Patition File No 11 33_�i7 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said news- paper once each week for a period of one wee commencing on the 2nd day of ___Mar-Q —, 191-Z and ending on the day of _ , 19 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $_—.2.0 which amount has been paid in full, at the rate of $ 2 - Q a hundred words for the first insertion and $ a hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2n d day of March --; . 19 n, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds, Wash. NOTICE OF PUIBLIC HEARING d NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE .......... 4/. .... o k .... AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR • • •'• .... egf>4 S 1 _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS: ....................................... ............ . ..........................�,%,�(' ........ .............................. ZONE -CLASSIFICATION:....".40.20 ......................... ......... . s TIME &DATE OF HEARING..4.° 3. TIME DAY DATE THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET. ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. COMMENTS CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE MEETING, IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE. FILE NO...1/01?".77 .... PUBLISHED...... . 7�.... The removal, mutilation, destruction, or concealment of this notice is a www AmRh 01 Mm I h1G'* misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE t .............. . 0AAN APPLICATION HAVING BEE FILED FOR re r ..... ........... IGO r2r, PROPERTY USCIIR-1—MION, OR ADDRESS:..... ............................... 41, 40 U) ............. .......... ........................... . ........................ ............. TION:f!�. J-0 ...................................... ZONE CLASSIFICATION: TIME- & DATE OF HEARING. .0 40.... !.I .. 1.1 TIME DAY DATE THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET. ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. COMMENTS CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE MEETING, IN PERSON OR IN 'WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED At THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE. FILE NO.i,.ya�. PUBLISHEDdo $.*. The removal, mutilation, destruction, AM or concealment of this notice is a 0 misdemeanor punishable by fine and ..ARr4 m%,Eul imprisonment. I ''t a NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE - )C$K2DM =XM PA)M R BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the 20th day of April , 19 77 , has been set as the date for hearing petition fi 1 ed' by Patrick J . Quinlan for a variance cKm1dibd=xkxxxx :t Variance of 8' on south. side and 9' on north -side from required 17V side yard setback; Variance from Section 12.15.110 regarding en- largement of nonconforming buildings I at 15706-75th Place West said.property being zoned FS-20. �lx�xt���e�ixar,5x���sx x , a a' h t Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the. Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds FILE NO: V-13-77 PUBLISH: 4-6-77 i t NI to ., i 't i.•,•(\ r? •r�'. l zt Ell 4 'i% h ) � Xi 5`+ 11 '�:.� �� ' \:./ i •- i t` /�i'"' ' ' tt;,i1�.C�::-�� (S1 '{ , Ca• Illl;�'i t �- r L r ,.`Ir; .. � . u L ?)J�� �r J 'I�.; / l ! til�•i / � it �?�1 1 r - II' 1/ c :� �. tiry •ICI ! �,: � ` � -_.,� �\ \. � ` . \ . 1 41 ; i !;`,1 � / � .f.' -1 C..'� �t 1 � •+ i •, � _ VVV J i. ,,. � >,� � �� ' ,� .. - � � � i5; � .. ,. 1 1 �—' C ' I � — �,#�� I I � _ _�__I _^_ �' _. w � .J 4 March 9, 1977 MEMO TO: Leif Larson { Director Public Works FROM: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: QUINLAN VARIANCE APPLICATION (V-13777) - th Place West,'is particularly This site, located at 1570675 sensitive due to the steep.slope and the slippage which has occurred in this area in the recent past: Because of the unique condition, it is imperative thatwe have your recommendations on the proposed construction, in f .accord with Edmonds City Code Section 11.02.030,(G), and also in regard 'to necessary -utilities., including the Septic ( r System. information b Monday, March.l5, 19,77. Please'provide this Y {{ j e MLB/le i f is 1 r a , Gov RA /L60A u,vE D I GREAT NOF�'i NERN`— , m �s_w ez9' RAtL - i1 i, UA ff) — 03� to " �►. ,� LUNDrS GULCH ROAD 7. sf .• I . R. n n 72nd. AVE. W. s fiU: w i jr •u v — 51---� --- — -— �� — — _ — _ — _- Q) 14 II I Ju �� �; I I. z z . i • -„ 1- '• I 70th. I AVE W `•'i I i I i iii �n lei 11. .'' � •j i-_ _ __ ,_...-_-ft-_' � •,;i ��I�1I' (��I�I,'�.r��r ri l' ryr ..-+s..a,• 1 Al r r ,, N ci tt l�rp� ,� I � f�,•j �,``` ,f If• 11 1 �r_ �, ` •`� 71J :i a- ii `I��\IjE'f I'')'\ I •.r�`i{1�?�IJ ' � t� �•�� � I' t, I .I 1 ,i ! I, I'I ' 1' r j .1 :I .cr -i� ; 4i r t�.ly 1�; � ESE,.. (, • � �'� jr l t ,,,- �; 7 rn l I jP , �1 'E 4J rt 1 ''' i..ic. 4-. '`��r'-7 ;I�. !:' !� .. I � ' .. r r ) rr'' �• ham. •�• i i(,7�t.`)((C- '� � (11�' •, t 'u I �)%` •i r I J•.. % i', �'� 'i � t, Ly , G� � IC 1 I �, t �' \ tir�.�;r %� , t ' , i� r •r r/) r � Z r .� e. �` '�C tf.] II•. `f.• `— � .� rl't _r> it i� t' J/1J r rt '�.1 �r •� 'f - i at. ' '.,r II.-.,��`�` ,�,'\ t9�t •- �. _'f 11 ri,.. I�:l1 �k. Ir � {i+ ('<`� ....\r��� '}� irk ♦ ���tl} '•f'I41. '•�\-, r I( 1. I 1 `� = i{ \f,) i•1 `-P'�fr f I� f;��� \(�\�`} tJ':N ``. 'I / L', ), )/; r'rr i r• r I , '. ,.. � +. �i l I ,J r .� t I ,'•�J I � � � ' t 1'•. i rt ' I t ��f �i I . 1 r t 1 `.. .. ct (,/,1 )I tl. A.,l I�r ,l.�f �.I� r I I •I J/ 1�•. �iY. \.. 71) : o. � J, tE�-�''' � 11 �'-�ii \. ail �' ' L itl t ': • � ,' I � i � �1j ( �, 1 �� /.lit•_ I I.iJ t r�ri�`` :t :.�. t': � .E ; 'l ' (�' 1 = •"J l t Z �y S t fi �� \ ._ t i' i � '� ' `I,I }r'. /'_ t , \y o _"�•; `!. 1': 11 )..... l Lid S• ,`r.\ ,:�;,�••'�'" ' ...- i ,_ :.�` ♦."''` � � fir; - � � ��; ,, rr >; ,h}, \ � ' , ',• 1 I �.._: �__ � � \ It li I w. ,�`'-....��.'4�'•i �tGy� � i' ,'t'I I�1 Yrt S+t` .•��rll i���� 'rl `~��i'. � f � � 0.1 .J 1 / l' "�\ )i ,r ',�r' .. i; '♦I I• � ,, •._ Ijl� ,'t� .'1 ` I. ;I PERMIT WHICH No. DATE WORX INSP. 7 s. �1 �1 I14SPECTJJii SHEET ADDRERF: �o 5-1319 /7LE- 1a ^� �'U al, i! W ,,eA ,, � {� 01 LOOS- / O' /o/ r 1 ' O V c iiJ oLl V ti" I i �i • l i � f t March 30, 1977. Patrick J. Quinlan ' 19007 36th W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 4 PROPERTY USE 15706 75TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS This is to advise you that, in the event that the.,Board of Adjustment approves your variance request (V-13-77) for improvement of,an existing g� house located at 15706 75th Place West, a -number of.conditions must be successfully met prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Special requirements are necessary due to the sensitive nature of this site and the history of earth movement in the area. The enclosed memos from the Building Official and the Director of Public Works enumerate requirements established by their departments. Review of a Building Permit Application at this address would include,but not be limited to,the items they have indicated. If you have any..questions on this matter, please contact the Planning. Division of the Edmonds Community Development Department. -t E E. JOSEPH WALLIS, Director Community Development Department EJW/asd Enclosures PAIM RECEIVED �; MAR 15 1977 City cf EdMIDI'dS at. Dept. C."M-oty 04*4 March 14, 1977 J MEMO TO: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: V-13-77 QuINLIN 15706 75TH PLACE WEST An investigation has been made of the site following the subject application for variance and knowledge that there is.impending construction on the site. This area is a known location of unsatisfactory foundation support and stability. Earth move ments have occurred in recent history and the effects are easily observable. In addition, this area disposes of sewage through individual septic disposal systems. The discharge of waste water into the soil further aggravates the instability of the soil. For the purposes of building, grading, and excavation on this site, the City Engineer declares this area unsuitable for improvement unless the applicant provide's a detailed report by a qualified soil specialist indicating that the intended construction will not cause an adverse effect or that any a proposed structure will not be adversely affected by existing soil conditions. Whether the variance is granted or not any construction on this site is subject to meeting the Building Code requirements referenced above - 11.02.025(g). RHA:lee TO: Planning Division Harry M. Whitcutt Building Official BUILDING PERMITS AT 15706-75th PLACE WEST The following provisions and conditions of issuance of Building Permits ` at the above location have been made by the Building Official:' 1) Foundation repair permit will be as contained in letter to owner dated November 19, 1976. (copy attached) t 2) Any permits to rebuild, expand or substantially alter the existingA structure will require the following: a) Review and approval of Permit by City Engineer per City Code Section 11.02.030(g) and of septic tank installation. f b) A soils report prepared by a licensed engineer be submitted, to include a plot plan showing the location of all test borings :. and/or excavations, descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered, and recommendations for foundation type and design criteria. (Reference UBC 2905) c) Building plans to bear the seal and signature of a licensed structural engineer and indicate a structural design in keeping ,., with the soils report. (Reference UBC 301) d) Submit a Hold Harmless Agreement, running with the land to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any claims for damages or injuries. /ae achments November 19, 1976 Mr. Patrick Quinlan 19007-36th Avenue -West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Re: Foundation repair at Dear Mr. Quinlan 1570(3-75th Place "lest TWO and one half.years have gone by since all elIg"leering design foundation s part of a permit application a was submitted a lication to repaiwas issued, or repair work "XIII$ damaged by earth movement. No permit. effected. a known area.of earth. is site is within You are well aware that th ince, that time the occiirred j.11. 1.97li. ce movement. The last 3140.' tal Policy implemented provisions of the State. Fnvironmen has impleM City 1 ntal ly sensistive Act, and determined that this i., an environine area. UBuild-ing�Code provides.that,foundation investOrigations Thia_, n"iform,-Prito may be required by the B uilding Official. Therefora, the'following: release of this permit -we will require 1) A plot plan be submitted to accurately the location of the house on the PVOPcrty- 2) A report be submitted, prepared zLll(l SiRneLl Iy-the engineer, site have been certifying, that the soil conditions at the the foundation design is a result Of investigated, and that that,investigation. requirements is contained ill -section 2.905 Authority for the above r L"IlTI-Ille er is referred. f Uniform Building Code 1973, to which your We also enclose a COPY of the ,eolol, 'ical Cross Section of the area, prepared -by Dames & Moore, 6P your illforination. Very -truly yolirs, EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Harry 1.1. Whitcutt Build) ill, official H14W/ae attachment V 3 i CITY QF F-017101\10S CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525 { COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR March 22, 1978' Harrison Jewell 8204 Greenlake Drive North;;r= �.E Seattle, Wa. 98103 f, PERMIT APPLICATION DATED MARCH 17, 197$ 15706-75th PLACE WEST. A stop -work order has been placed on construction at the above address, since permit #770634 was issued for i repair only of an existing foundation, a Before release of a permit for construction above the foundation, the following must be done: i 1) Furnish a soils report, modifying that furnished under permit #770634, which was for repair of an existing residence, not demolition and construction of a new structure. 2) Plans as submitted are inadequate to detail the i proposed structure. Refer to enclosed plan require- ments. Also, plans must bear the seal and signature of a licensed engineer, and indicate that the structural design detailed for repair of the existing structure is I adequate for the proposed new construction. I 3). Provide evidence that septic tank system is'in satisfactory. operating condition. (See enclosed memo from Public Works Department) i 4) File a Hold Harmless Agreement similar to that issued under Permit #770634. (Copy enclosed) t r 1 �Gc � . Harry. Whitcutt Building Official HMWJae cc: City Engineer } Planning Div. { attachments I t, ­11 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY TFfE ............. 4044 ...... AOr4e S r A -C 7 ------- AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR.�W.64*0� SAW-. AAAO.. 9. a0VA04cm - 1.7 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS:.. .................. ............ .. ............... % 'a ®...�. �. G..... . /. wr... . ............................ ................................................. ZONE' CLASSIFICATION: — ......................................... TIME . & DATE OF HEARING.?O".34.00&).� .... W6.4M. TIME AY DATE THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL' STREET. ANY PERSON -INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. COMMENTS CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE MEETING, IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE. FILE NOV�1?.--77 ..... PUBLISH E D. V .74. " 22 .... The removal, mutilation, destruction, or WAKwan'k lk I concealment of this notice prior to the date KIMING16 of the hearing is a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonme6t. I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON l ss COUNT i OF SNOHOMISH r THOMAS J. COAD, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says that he is the Publisher of the EDMONDS TRIBUNE -REVIEW, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and has been designated as such by Court Order No. 38282, and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the publications herein- after referred to, published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of L1^ ' said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, and that it was of general circulation in said Snohomish County -- — -- � That the annexed is a true copy of a __ No t i C e Qf H e_$.r3 ng a e w" as i Q , as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said news- paper once each week for a period of .._� ;_tea =gweek 01 z Jan a commencing on the __6th____ day of April 1g73 t�#''°`}�"� and ending on the __ 19—, lc,'9 3& 6 day of - - -> 1 qvq♦rj}�q �'rt both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its 39I1$ subscribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing � g g publication is the sum of $ 2.86 which amount has �flIt."`�'{ been paid in full, at the rate of $ 2 a 00_ a hundred words for the first insertion 'p�b;�r�' and $ __ a hundred words for each subsequent insertion. L°�l��fta't",t4 V�r�r ILi� z � 13 tPl? Subscribed and sworn to before met 6 h_ day of _ April 19-7 WAIT Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Edmonds, Wash. �S F } 1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH } 1 being -first duly sworn, f I on oath deposes and says: f ' That on the _6� %\ _day of 9,4AJ 19 ,the � "> attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance,'; ?' and in any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applic- able, on or near the subject property.`' Signed f Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11 /' day of i 19-• Notary P lic in a for tie State Ayf!` Washing n residin atJi S Y 3 i s ' i s. i i i f r w V-13-77 ``':PATRICK°J. UINLAN - Variance of 8on south and-9' on the north -from ' required°19de yard setback, Variance from Section 12:15.110 regarding enlargement'o'f nonconforming bui'ldings''at'15706.- 75tii P1 W:''(RS=20) i Mrs. Block showed the location on a vicinity sketch and showed the con- s figuration of the house on the lot, noting the very steep slope. She showed slides of the property and commented that there is no existing �.. house on the adjacent lot to the -north. Mrs. Block noted that the applicant had been advised: by letter of March 30, 1977 of hazards in developing this site because it is a slide area. Mr. Quinlan acknowledged receipt of the ,letter. Mrs. Block said there had been earth movement in , this area in 1974, causing a break in the foundation. The applicant ;. wished to improve the 'house by repairing and adding to it and needed a variance for setbacks. Because of the 4.5' width.of the lot he could only have a 10' wide house if he met the 17Z' required setbacks on each side. He was therefore asking for a variance from the setbacks and a variance from the Code requirement prohibiting enlargement of. I nonconforming uses. Mrs. Block read the Engineering Department report on the property, indicating that a discharge of waste water into the , soil would cause further adverse effects on the soil conditions. She said a number of special' requirements would be necessary to obtain a building permit and that they had been explained to the applicant. She then i' reviewed the variance criteria. .She felt -the granting of the variance should not be detrimental to others in the neighborhood.` She noted that the minimum variance would be in order to'repair the existing structure', '✓ and the applicant was asking to do more than just' repair. the structure. I >• " She said she would not.recommend approval to expand the structure in any 4. direction, but she would recommend approval for repair of the existing , structure. She noted that the proposal to expand was to build up on the structure, which could increase the tendency of the house not to be stable. The public 'portion of the hearing was opened. Patrick J. Quinlan, the applicant, said the foundation of this building ._ will have to be removed and reconstructed which will cost $7,000. He said it is a one bedroom house and that it would not be sensible to 7 spend the $7,000 to repair it without adding on to it and making a more economical structure.` He said he was not asking for a variance on the height requirements,, that the structure would be less than 30' The e: width of the building would not be expanded and he said he would not be v: obstructing anyone's view because of the topography of the lot. He i referred to two other variances which had been granted in the area. Don'Carrol of 15701 75th Pl. said his view would, be blocked if the , applicant built up, but he said he had watched that property decline for r many years and he felt the whole community would benefit by whatever the applicant wanted to do to the property, that anything he did would upgrade it. He commented that the Crawford house was one the applicant had cited as having received a variance, and that house was beautiful, well done I h' by an architect. Norm Elson of Lot 27, immediately across from the . a applicant's property, said he agreed with Mr. Carrol, but his main concern was that the applicant knew what he was getting into. Mr. Quinlan reiterated '.' that he would not be going above the height restriction. He said he was well below the street level and could not possibly obstruct anyone's view. u City Attorney Wayne Tanaka interjected that Mr. Quinlan's use was permitted `. in the zone he is in --that he was not nonconforming. He said the section „ r of the Code prohibiting a person from repairing a nonconforming building !` in excess of 25% of its value in a 12-month period is 12.15.090, rather than 12.15.110 and lie recommended the applicant so amend his application at f; c this time, which the applicant did. The public portion of the hearing was r then closed. Mr. Roy expressed the feeling that it would be good to improve the property. E He said it would be costly to the applicant but would be a pleasant place to live. Mrs. Block noted that he would have to sign a document holding the City harmless. MR. ROY THEN MOVED, SECONDED BYMR. .LERAAS, THAT,• V-13-77 BE:APPROVED, -AS AMENDED DURI14G THE HEARING,' BECAUSE HE FELT THE r' EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT April 20, 1977 - Page 3 I i APPLICANT WAS WELL AWARE OF WHAT HE WAS DOING AND THAT HE'°KNEW 'IT WAS A SLIDE AREA; THAT TO JUST LEAVE THE HOUSE AS IT WAS WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO -THE NEIGHBORHOOD, AND IF HE HAD THE 'COURAGE TO IMPROVE IT; THAT WAS GOOD; THAT THE CITY WOULD MAKE THE=APPLICANT DO IT PROPERLY;'AND IT WOULD'NOT'BE ` AFETY OF THE'NEIGHBORHOOD: MOTION DETRIMENTAL TO HE HEALTH, MORALS AND S °CARRIED. V-14-77 B. G. OSTOLAZA - Variance of 4' from required 20' access easement at h 19918 Maplewood Dr. (RS-12) Mrs. Block displayed a vicinity sketch and slides of the easement in question. The application was in conjunction with a subdivision. Mrs. 20' Block reviewed the variance criteria, noting that the Code requires this is only 16'. She of access easement to serve two or more lots, and it was the applicant's choice to secure the subdivision and he did have said the potential option of a joint access with the neighbor to the north. She noted in the slides.the present configuration of three driveways which ,.. presents a potentially hazardoussituationin the case of emergencies barrier between the driveways and she commented ! , because of the concrete that by adding another lot to this the problem is increased. She read memoranda from the Fire and Engineering Departments, the Fire Department be separated, and the Engineering Depart - } feeling the driveways should not A t th 16' strip is sandwiched between two similar access i ment fin Ing t a e roads. City standards for access have -been based on being able to pass a stalled vehicle on the road. Mrs. Block recomineiided that the applicant work with the neighboring property owners for joint access of the front portion of the access where no trees would have -to be taken out. 'The public portion of the hearing was then opened. (: Joan Ostolaza stated that as you go towards the back of the access ease- ments -the Hammersla road drops, so the road cannot be shared. Dr. B. G. Ostolaza added that the cement divider is only 6 811 high and wide and would not obstruct vehicles as much as the trees at the back. The public portion was then closed. Mr. Hovde commented that use of narrower lanes will become more common as fewer people drive big cars. ;He noted that the lanes do afford privacy, and he felt the aesthetics outweighed the danger in this matter. He said good lots in this area are scarce and he would be in favor of the application just on the feasibility of it. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY MR. ROY, SECONDED BY MR. HOVDE, THAT V-14-77 BE APPROVED INASMUCH AS ONE RESIDENCE IS EXISTING AND APPEARS TO BE SERVED AMPLY BY THE ACCESS EASEMENT AND THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY REASON WHY IT WOULD NOT SERVE TWO RESIDENCES; IT WAS NOT REASONABLE TO DENY THIS APPLICATION ON THE BASIS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES; OTHER LANES IN THE AREA WERE SERVING SEVERAL PROPERTIES; IT APPEARED TO BE A: REASONABLE REQUEST AND.NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, MORALS, AND.WELFARE OF THE AREA. MOTION CARRIED. ;.1 V-15-77 JIMMIE SPECHT - Variance of 1'9" from required 15', building height at 1055 - 7th Ave. S. (RS-6) Mrs. Block indicated this application was for an accessory building, the U building in question being off the alley. She shoaled the location on a 4 vicinity sketch and also showed slides of the site. She said there is a slope to the site which is causing the problem with the height. She noted that the zoning code requirement for an accessory building in an } RS-6 zone is for a 15' height maximum, and the applicant was requesting a 119" variance from this requirement. Ile wished to build a garage on the northwest corner of a sloping site off the alley, the site sloping t from east to west. Mrs. Block indicated that strict enforcement of the Code would prohibit the owner from constructing the garage which was proposed to be 14' high on the alley side, and the location proposed was the most reasonable for access. If recreational vehicles were to be EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT April 20, 1977 - Page 4 The applicant has been advised by letter dated March 30, 1977 with attachments from Engineering ane '-iilding Divisions of the hazare— involved in the development of this site. PLA.,NNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW! FORM FILE # V-13-77 APPLICANT: PATRICK J. QUINLAN ADDRESS: 15706-7tTH Place West ZONING: RS-20 VARIANCE REQUESTED: 8 Ft and 9 Ft from required side yard setbacks -and also from Section of code in regard to enlarging non -conforming uses. _V2_. Qq0__ ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT: 17 1/2 side yard setback - Section � �� prohibits enlargement of non -conforming uses. OTHER PERTINENT FACTS: This house is located in an area which has experienced earth movement in recent years. (Read Eng. Memo) A number of special requirements would be necessary to obtain a building permit VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100 1. Does this amount to a rezone? NO. Existing non -conforming lot. Approx. 11 000 sq ft f 0 2.(a) Are there.conditiohs and/or circumstances not generally applica�9 e o other lands in the same district? This lot does not meet the size requirements of the RS-20 Zone. (b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code deprive the property owner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? Strict enforcement, i. of the Code would preclude the owner from doing any improvement to the existing house. } i 3. Do the special conditions result frerp. the actions of the applicant? No — (Have (although the applicant is asking more than 'lust the required repair of the house - applicant explain) also wants to add to structure) 4. Ara there unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties which render it difficult to carry out the provisions of the zoning code? Yes, the size of th!"lot makes extremely difficult to meet the required setbacks. (Width 45 ft-setbacks total 35 ft) 5, Will .the granting of the va.rianco be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of property owners in the vicinity?_It should not be detrimental to other property owners, although as stated previously this is a very sensitive site and the advisability of adding to it is very_questionable. --- 6. Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land? The minimum variance would be to re air, the_exigting s ructure. He is asking__.mG�.__ 7. Will the gran Ling of the vi:-triance generally be in harmony and compatible with this zoning code? Yes would be conditional upon meeting all Buildings Engineering and Planning requirements and signing Hold Harmlesseement with the City_______� Recommend approval of the variance to improve/repair existing structure. Would not recommend approval to expand the structure in any direction. P1ai,ner's Variance Review 11/76 I� �I a i Y � / Ef f Vy y� y r 4 GJ op r< x a \ V