Loading...
15711 72ND AVE W.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII 5569 15711 72ND AVE W ADDRESS: /5�7// - 7,2/1 A,. ZCJ TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: O`1 '1D `/ `7 ' Ll (/ DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver Study Required Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: S PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: ) LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: ( ��—�� / LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LATEMPOSTsTorms\Street File Checklist.doc 0 • PLANNING DATA NAME: C�llVeiY (mil GOrlgtrt tC; lM DATE: I I / I (o I Z00 5' SITE ADDRESS: 15 -4 1 2-7-,A Q( An(L, W PLAN CHK//: a5- 48-4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:_IS1 V REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: es No) MAP PAGE: 50-1• CORNER LOT: (Yes No FLAG LOT: ZONING: (2-S 12 CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION s: q61 - ZI $ 200 y -1 07- _ Na CS• Study Required: o"I'•ec ki P-eq ort b _f) n t i6 bru Gei 11 W a 1 Vie'V �l ❑ Waiver S u bYY1 i f-+e, �l (BTU VIA 20 ,1-0 015 ( 3 3•/ • 51 DP -P- C] _ 11 Conditional Waiver h-i'L(dl� � w1 nle-'-,G 1/' t�'�i� �11 d� h a ti Q r d �SEPA DETERMINATION: {�� O q / 30 / y005"' lJ Fee p N 5 fu r g Va d i ✓I 9 Of 310 0 Lu to i (-. y a lr d s -Fti r 2 2�cckhSt pYo j P- viS ► 5-+Il 8� 15; APO list w/ notarized form (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) ❑ Exempt SETBACKS: Re uired Setbacks: N yJ Street:��ke€t• Side: I Q Right Side: I C) Rear: 151 Ac�ttTMI Setbacks: I Street: 25 Eeft Side: Zb 1 Rigk►t Side: V ?71 Rear: I Lo 1 Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes / No / ❑ DETACHED STRUCTURES: t�10Y1e. E,"OWn OYl 51 -1-•e pI a V1. ® ROCKERIES: e)Lk?pO6l yj 9 a cut SI Opp in 5-ei'bG t . -e as 1 Yl� V1�- IJ ❑ FECES/TRELLISES: N bVl e✓ S V1 pW ✓1 6Y1 1 }r pj qh - ® BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: p0itl D p rv3e(,i- 5 4, ) Y)- 0 rO-QY STAIRS / DECKS Meek 1p ba h PARKING- Required:y Actual: 'Y LOT 12 0 0 0 t# 0 0 of jt4'-_ AREA: l LOT COVE Zr I}a.} Iv, D 0 D = 21 '� 21 ' � f- 2� `� ' 24 ( � Calculations: BUILDING HEIGHT: , •' Datum Point: °C' NW YYI CY Datum Elevation: 2� 2 A ' Zq o • G • t �j ; p 303• Maximum Allowed: _ 25' ( 3 lot . 4 Z5 Actual Height ?i 21 (3 I (o. • 3 3 G ; 2 q , A-O-U- CREATED?: & Yes _�j[}2, C j(j P�YI �h.D oy) p ; Z�; • �. SUBDIVISION: cj -1,0 Q 4 - 1 b 1 " ILO+ :1-" LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: (Yes / o) �• ti Z`J OTHER: 1 irear Ioa (, AY7JlMt2d t,�} * �.,. A-V�a9e UrAde +2.61 IirYli--= Plan Review By:_ C21, n p(, I a/ l (23 l ot.42'-6 max) NewBPPlaruiingDataForm.DOC Silver Gltm Construction 9ebJ:DJIbbU P.i • -�• Guu-04G-8442 P-1 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. A o & , 16, M.S.C.E.. M.B.A. Geolechnical/Civil Engineer J_,&NNY -REAf WltJ l t,.v E lz I T -p L C r+�c tZ o S- 2� (S - 15 "1 U t S ST t 1 t-f n-, S W- 4�; e0-TC-C_ttN%dkL `{�EvtEw o� P1�AcN S REtFEREe�cE •: `9E0-CEGl�- i��ORT �Y ��iZU(.E�P.� (o . i20-OS STATEMENT OF MINIMAL RISK: The plans and specitications for the 3 NCALI S (� lS i t�j (6-7�t� s k -.e S mot. - have been reviewed by this engineer and conform to -the recommendations of the analysis and report and, provided that those conditions and recommendations are satisfied during the construction and use, and inspected and verified by this engineer, the area disturbed by construction will be stabilized and remain stable and will not increase the potential for soil movement, and the risk of damage to the proposed development and from the development to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal. ' SPECtAL CgcoTeCEf•NIC�L Z Y lots EA)G IAJr67k . Q,c1,, E e_-T(o N x `S � o TONAL EXRRES 12r2-V % D o . SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SrrE DEVELOPMENT - IN.4PECTION • DRAINAGE - DESIGN S PERM/T Lt(iAL P.O. 8OX S5562 - Shoreline, Washinglon 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 STREET FILE U El JAN 19 2006 autCiW OF EDNONDS E El ED N 47 20 OEVELCtTM TEDMVICES DS �1 65 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. E M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechr ical Civil Engineer 6 June 20, 2005 EECE Silver City Construction P.O. Box 1417 STREET FILE Mukilteo, WA 98275 PERklT Co Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation — Foundation Recommendations Proposed 3 New Residences 72 Ave. W (near 157"' St. SW), Meadowdale area, E onds, Washington �,�.d A -V C This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the Silver City property on 72"d Ave. W (near 157"' St. SW), in the Meadowdale area, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was required due to owner / contractor concerns, as well as City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Property Survey and civil layout by Tietze and Associates • Individual house plans (to be submitted by Silver City Construct • Site.. photographs BACKGROUND: n) OCT 19 2005 EECE The overall property is understood to consist of 3 lots (for the proposed 3 new single-family homes). The northern lot is designated "Lot A" and has approximately 122 feet of frontage along 72"d Ave. W. The intermediate lot is designated ULot C" and has 85 lineal feet along 72"d Ave. W. The southern lot is designated °Lot Bn and also has 85 lineal feet of frontage. All 3 lots are approximately 150 feet deep. The lots have never been developed and contain mature trees, shrubbery and grasses (see photographs). The rear portion of all 3 lots (the easterly zone) contains slopes that exceed 40 percent in declination (see Topographic Map). At the time of this report, it is understood that Silver City Construction proposes to construct 3 new single-family residences with access drives off 72"d Ave. W (see Site Plan and Project Plans). Site grading will require slope stabilization using standard rockery techniques- as in on the Civil Plans. Geotechnical inspections required for rockery construction on slopes. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 • (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 2 Visual evaluation of the property revealed no evidence. of any geotechnical distress: no slides, no settlements, no soil tension cracks or any evidence of erosional degradation. EVALUATION: In order to augment the existing site geotechnical information, 4 soil test pits were dug under this engineer's observation on June 7, 2005 using a track hoe (see photographs). One test pit was dug on "Lot A°, one pit on °Lot C° and 2 pits on uLot B". All 4 test pits revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely: 0" to 8° Organics, roots, and organic silt 8" to 8' (bottom of test pits) Very dense sand with gravels No water was encountered in any of the 4 test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, the Silver City property on 72"d Ave. W (near 157th St. SW), Edmonds, Washington is geotechnically approved for the proposed 3 new residences, subject to the following: • No excavation deeper than 4 feet without geotechnical review and temporary - shoring. At the time of this report, it is understood that no excavation will exceed 4 feet in depth. If deeper excavations are utilized, additional geotechnical review and shoring recommendations are.required. • Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. • Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall design provided drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. • For retaining wall design, use friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. • Geotechnical inspections by this engineer np �or to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for Silver: City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 3 structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the over -excavation and the footing width. For example, an over -excavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated .that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch. NOTE: The bearing capacity of 3,000 p.s.f. applies to over -excavated and backfill conditions. Footings placed on native soils may be designed for 2,000 p.s.f. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design. values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Where.- (1) P.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 4 SLABS -ON -GRADE: Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re -compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained'by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain -level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: Design Value 35 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) f p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active, equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. • Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 5 Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five "(5) percent silt or day particles and have no particles greatei than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their°high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should beyplaced against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically- connected to the foundation; drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: At the time of this investigation and report, excavations are proposed to be no deeper than 4 feet in depth. If actual excavations exceed 4 feet in depth, additional geotechnical review is required with probable temporary shoring utilizing Ecology - Blocks will be necessary. In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 2H:1V. It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware_ of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary_ - or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil.. • • Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 6 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. No groundwater was observed in any of the 4 test pits during the fieldwork. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation rof the site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. Thermoisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type; compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the: lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: • • Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 7 Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of , Sub -grade, 90% below that level Where: Minimcim relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils y_ If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy,. on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally sandy and thus are not highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture 'content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill, which is to be placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or, clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill .material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials are segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the Silver City property'on 72"d Ave. W. The property slopes downhill to. the west with any runoff entering the City of Edmonds storm system in 72"d Ave. W. It is understood that development of these 3 lots will require street improvements to include storm water -drainage controls. _. The sub -grade soils are extremely sandy and will allow for on -site infiltration if desired. This engineer could provide on -site infiltration designs for storm water controls. Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 8 CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. SLOPES — SETBACKS — BUFFERS: t This engineer has reviewed the Site Plan by Tietze and Associates dated June 7, 2005. The Site Plan indicates that each of the new residences will be located in the western portion of the lot with driveway access from 72"d Ave. W. These house siting locations are geotechnically approved, subject to inspections by this engineer. The eastern pgrtions of the 3 lots will require slope grading and rockery walls for erosion stabilization. Inspections are required for rockery construction on slopes. If actual house locations are altered from the current Site Plan, this engineer should review house locations and make additional recommendations as required. EROSION HAZARD AREA — DESIGNATION: It is understood that the overall property is designated as a potential erosion hazard area given the presence of Alderwood Everett soil type on slopes 15 percent or greater. The findings of this geotechnical investigation have verified dense sub -grade sands that allow for excellent foundation support and excellent sub -grade drainage. The construction of 3 new residences with reinforced concrete foundation elements, proper drainage controls, and slope stabilization rockeries will im rove any potential for erosion on the slopes. INSPECTIONS: The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts • Temporary shoring, if required • Foundation sub -grade verification • Any retaining wall, or rockery placement • Any fill placement _ • Subsurface drainage installation Silver City Construction June 20, 2005 Page 9 • Temporary and final erosion control measures SUMMARY: The proposed 3 new residences by Silver City Construction on 72"d Ave. W, Edmonds, Washington are geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and requirements, and key geotechnical inspections during construction. GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF FINAL PLANS: .r At the time of this investigation and report, final house plans were not available for review. As stated in this report, the June 7, 2005 Site Plan indicates that each new residence will be located' in the western portion of the lots with no significant soil cuts greater than 4 feet in depth. Prior to final permit issuance, this engineer should review the final house plans to veri compliance with the recommendations of this report. Upon satisfactory review, a "Statement of Minimal Risk" will be issued. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the. recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. DMB:abj rocs 221Z3! a� Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer n. 'A' -1 N N.� SETBACK ZINC M7 GARAGEGr .g E11 NZ11 .-- 45 ad ....04 GARA GE R) I r S�) Ij zz: NZ r I., Q� rorr.l, '01 NO NO �66 . .. .. .... : gt 279 't7'ln 00 7 :lZ �t6 IN, 10.00 - Ne Y -i Gt.er^.'""Sy14,.y.+•'V-_`3.riypvl 'z<+i.� y'S..i. L':. .. ... ._._.... . ROCKERY WALL G ROPO.�E Y K \ MAX. HEIGHT' 6'} y ._l�: •. °°... a a', a C„ I 1 � N 1 �. ,,� I' • •u a 1 '� �ti:?Il,.::. . t.`, •..\ PROCKERY WALL\ . HOUSE MAX. HEIGHT - 6 „ RES/L7ENCE aI �; ELEXCEPT/ON EL OOR REV _ 272.0 VACANT \ \\ p + n Jc I, - 7 .� _ .tea. � � ....... -.. _.... _ \ , � `''•., ._.... _ ;; � ,.1/? .i:) ,.i. : •y' 1yr-0Q 'I: G -11 e l 1 � l 270.4 1 '', ROCKERY WALL ; �;iF , . �. 4 • w `, 'MAX. HEIGHT — ! 8' T di-, r l 2724 7.4 r5 i f{ e � a• /'ram e � Q 11 'i 1 1 { 't + I 1.,, ��� P/POPGISEL7. IK d e' PROPOSED ; c� : it i LOT A HOUSE RES/DENCE FLOOR ELEV r ` VA; N\\ 1' 272 9 \ 272 4 272.4 it 1 g0 V C" Ad "' n STREET FILE ce,tirCate aOccupancy DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS PER INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE SECTION R110 AT: 15711 — 72Id Avenue W Occupancy established by this certificate: R3 No. Stories: 2 l Basement: N/A Building Permit M 2006-0283 Dwelling Units: 1 Type of Construction: VB Owner of building: Silver City Construction,- Inc. The Sinale Family Residence at 15711 — 72"d Avenue W —has . been inspected and approved complying with the requirements the 2003 edition of the International Residential Code as adopted by the City.for the group and division of occupancy and the use for which the proposed occupancy is classified. Issued this 3rd day of September, 2007 Chief Building Official By: Any change of occupancy or use requires a building permit and a new Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. SSMH 4"SS �\\ BLOCKWA �S33 450 BEND DOWN MODULAR BLOCK WALL PVC C/O 6 5' POWER TEL. 7 5' CABLE 23' 1'D 5'ACP WALKWAY G� 16 LF D.I.P. m r 8"-� 3' D ROMAC D.I.P. n COUPLING TO PVC (BOTHENDS) —�1.5'MEASURED ON " SLOPE OF ROAD 72 N D AVE W GRAVEL D/W TO 15620 72A =4 of EDo� CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS: PERMIT 15711 72ND AVE W N" ENG20060239 CONTRACTOR: HOMEOWNER: SCALE: AL JACKSON JAIME SCHWARTZ NTS DATE INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: DATE DRAWN: DRAWN BY: 9/05/06 L. CHRISMAN 9/11/06 I. ABILA E.D. 0 '/L CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS- BUIL ADDRESS. 15711 72N D AVE W I NO MIT I ENG20060239 CONTRACTOR: HOMEOWNER: W-HLc: AL JACKSON JAIME SCHWARTZ I NTS DATE INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: DATE DRAWN: DRAWN BY: 9/05/06 1 L. CHRISMAN 9/11/06 1 I. ABILA F ti -- 72ND AVE W - - - - CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS -BUILT ADDRESS: PERMIT 15711 72ND AVE W NO - BLD20060283 C❑NTRACT❑R: H❑ME❑WNER: SCALE: SILVER CITY XXXXX NTS DATE INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: DATE DRAWN1 DRAWN BY: 9/28/06 1 J. McCONNELL 1 10/02/06 I. ABILA /5-111 7ol" aze- ZC/ f: M.S.C.E., M.B.A. r r _ Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. City of Edmonds Community Services Division 121 51h Ave. N Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical / Civil Engineer RECEIVED January 14, 2007 ' JAN 2 6 2007 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS STREET FILE Subject: Field Reports chnical Inspections 15719, 15715, 5711 - 2"d Ave. W, Edmonds, Washington Silver City Cons ction - 3 New Residences 5 City of Edmonds Permit - ) This engineering report presents the results of ongoing geotechnical inspections for the,--3 new residences by Silver City Construction at the above addresses. These inspections were required as a condition :of permit by the City of Edmonds. REFERENCES: • City of Edmonds approved' Project Plans • Geotechnical and Inspection Reports by D. Bruce, P.E. • City of Edmonds Special Inspection Agreement • Site photographs INSPECTIONS: This engineer has provided and continues to provide on -site geotechnical inspections for the 3 residences listed above. As of this report date (January 14, 2007), all geotechnical inspection items have been completed for the 3 houses themselves. However, additional inspections are required for the work pending regarding the completion. of the road and driveway entrances. The following summary applies to all 3 lots. Soil Cuts: Previously verified and stable. No adverse impacts: had'occurreflo any of the 3 lots due to excavation.' All excavation is stabler NOTE: All excavation for the 3 residences has been properly backfilled and is stable. SOILS • FOUNDATIONS • SITE DEVELOPMENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DESIGN & PERMIT • LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 • Shoreline, WA 98155 - (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 Citpof Edmonds Re: Silver City Construction January 14, 2007 Page 2 • Temporary Shoring: Previously discussed — not required. • Foundation Sub -Grade: Previously verified and approved. All foundation footings have been properly placed in accordance with City of Edmonds approved plans and inspections. • Fill Material: None required for geotechnical foundation purposes. Free draining gravel was used in conjunction with the terraced keystone block walls. All imported gravel was properly placed under this engineer's inspections. • Subsurface Drainage: Previously inspected and approved. NOTE: Geotechnical inspections in December 2006 observed localized zones of excessive ponded water in property yard. This engineer advised Silver City Construction to place additional "French drains" with proper tight line connections to the existing gutter downspout and storm water system. Follow-up inspections verified that the additional drainage improvements eliminated the ponded water zones. • Keystone Block Wall: See structural detail by Wendall Reed, P.E. This engineer performed on -site inspections to verify the following: Stable soil cuts in dense, native, sub -grade material. Proper placement of compacted crushed rock as a sub -base for the'blocks, proper block placement in accordance with manufacturer's guidelines, effective? placement of gravel. backfill.and geo-grid layers in accordance with structural design (attached). All keystone block walls for the 3 lots have' been completed and are geotechnically approved. NOTE: This engineer understands that additional block walls (or equivalent) will be placed during the final grade work of the access roadway. Inspections continue. • Temporary Erosion Control Measures: Contractor has continued to properly maintain the rocked construction entrances for the 3 residences, siltation fencing, and inlet catch basin "socks". City of Edmonds Re: Silver City Construction January 14, 2007 Page 3 i Landscaping for the 3 residences has been completed (see photographs). There are no exposed earth surfaces on the resident lots themselves. NOTE: Additional grading work and final landscaping has yet to occur for the completion of the access roadway (72"d Ave. SW). SUMMARY: • All geotechnical inspection items for the 3 residences have been properly completed. • Geotechnical inspections continue for the completion of the access road, final grading, slope stabilization walls (as required for the roadway), and permanent erosion control measures. If there are any questions,. do not hesitate to call. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical / Civil Engineer DMB:abj cc: Silver City Construction r F r o •; t i � � J •% `I Y tv �stq �y�+•+ iV^{t`r+t„x Tr ...ri , 2.,' tie 1 ` ! -'$� .. CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 *PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE* STATUS: ISSUED ENG20060378 :i ce:: Tr*VITAT E RR►7: T (7-EAV amd Permit Number: ENG20060378 Expiration Date: 11/6/2006 Job Address: 15711 72ND AVE W, EDMONDS APPLICANTCONTRACTOR PILCHUCK CONTRACTORS INC PILCHUCK CONTRACTORS INC 13330 STONE AVE N 13330 STONE AVE N SEATTLE, WA 98133 SEATTLE, WA 98133 206-418-4239 LICENSE 4: PILCHCI101MA EXP: 2/20/2007 To tie into 2-inch gas main @ 3-11 east of center line and a)1end 310-ft south to serve 15711, 15715, 15719 72nd Ave W. Bore hole hog DISRUPTION INF ASSESSED VALUE: $0.00 PROPERTY AREA: 0 SIDEWALK: (OXO) DURATION IN MONTHS: 0 FEE: $0.00 STREET DISRUPTION TRENCH CUT: ( 0 X 0 ) PARKING: ( OXO ) DURATION IN MONTHS: 0 FEE: $0.00 YEAR OF OVERLAY: 0 FEE: $0.00 ALLEY: (OXO ) DURATION IN MONTHS: 0 FEE: $0.00 INDEMNITY The Applicant has signed an application which states he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. TH E C O NTRAC TO R IS RES PO NS IB LE FO R WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD O F O NE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OFTHEWORK. Traffic Control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possesion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the workday- NO EXCEPTIONS. Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800424-5555) BEFOREANY EXCAVATION CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) 771-0220 EXT.1326 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS 'MISAPPLICATION IS NOTA PERMITUNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. Printed: Tuesday, Se 6f,-S -o( ❑ FILECOPY *SPFJCTORCOPY APPLICANT COPY STATUS: ISSUED ENG20060378 • Restore ROW to City standards • Call for locates of underground utilities prior to any excavation. • Alert affected residents and/or businesses prior to work start. • Conform to approved working drawings and Traffic Control plan. • Public utilities maintain 5' separation fiom City Utilities. • Verify clear bore crossings • Maintain erosion & sedimentation control. Keep street clean. • Construction hours are Monday -Friday 7am-6pm and Saturdays 10am-6pm No work on Sundays or Federal Holidays. • Call for required inspections as noted. INSPECTIONS • E-Engineering Final PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL: NOTES: PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL: NOTES: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED DATE: INITIAL: o1i Ebi-vo CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 C. PERMIT FEES/ RECEIPT DATE: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 PERMIT #: ENG20060378 PROJECT ADDRESS: 15711 72ND AVE W, EDMONDS PROP OWNER: SILVER CITY CONSTRUCTION INC P O BOX 1417 MUKILTEO, WA 98275 206-501-5490 * FEE S UMMARY- Description," Fee Amount _ _Paid B+lance`_Du6 X-Permit Surcharge Fee $15.00 $0.00 $15.00 E-Right of Way Permit Fee $160.00 $0.00 $160.00 E-Engineering Inspection Fee $50.00 $0.00 $50.00 Total Due: $225.00 $0.00 $225.00 'FEES ARE EST/MATED BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED AT SUBMITTAL -SUBJECT TO CHANGE .AMFN'TIUNS."ON, TO BE BUED QUARTERLY Pilchuck Contractors;. Inc. y�„• Job #107025398 Nov" ;,20M 3� Sheet. 1/1, J.Crabb NOT TO SCALE s • • • • 24 HR. NOTICE REa. • FOR INSPECTION • ON DEVICE SPACING i • Ov3Hv p AaOM p avow r � o 0 03SO10. r a30lItOHS 1HOla CHANNELIZATI TAPER TANGENT 40 80 w 30 60 20 40 DEAD END iaoin ai aw 3 FUSE TIE—IN 270'S C/L, 2'E—E EDGE PAVING GAS PIPE DIRECT BURY CUSTOMER PROVIDED TRENCH NTS 156 TH 20'R/W EX. 5/8" 268'S 1988 PROP. 2" MPE IP MAIN _ 2'E—E EDGE PAVING ►0 W MAIN. ROPES Q FROM: --'S C/L,_—'E C/L TO: __'S C/L, __'E C/L Z N PROP. 2" MPE IP MAIN 9'E C/L END OF MAIN (2" MPE CAP) 580'S C/L, 9'E C/L _ST SW 45'R/W 40'R /� o0 CI o Fv r� w ILn 0_ Iw CL qa qa qa I CV Iw L I N V qa qa qa � L I qa qa qa P L I I 40'R f C PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50' qa 1. IF THE TRENCH BOTTOM CONTAINS ANY SHARP OR UNUSUALLY ROUGH SURFACES, A MINIMUM OF 3" OF INITIAL BACKFILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED TO BED THE PIPE, UNLESS THE CARRIER PIPE IS ENCASED OR WRAPPED WITH AN APPROVED ROCK SHIELD MATERIAL. 2. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE SAND, NATIVE SOIL, OR SOIL —BASED SELECT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SHARP ROCKS OR ROCKS LARGER THAN 1/2" DIAMETER. SEE PSE SPECIFICATION 1275.1380, "SAND BACKFILL FOR GAS PIPE, ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, AND CABLE. 3. A MINIMUM OF 6" OF INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE GAS PIPE. IF THE NATIVE SOIL CONTAINS ROCKS LARGER THAN 6" DIAMETER, THEN A TOTAL OF 12" OF INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE GAS PIPE. 4. IF THE CARRIER PIPE IS ENCASED, INITIAL BACKFILL IS NOT REQUIRED. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL MEET FINAL BACKFILL MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS. WHERE THE CARIER PIPE ENTERS AND EXITS THE CASING, THE INITAL BACKFILL AND BEDDING REQUIREMENTS APPLY. 5. FINAL BACKFILL MAY BE SOIL —BASED SELECT MATERIAL OR NATIVE SOIL, BUT SHALL BE FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ROCKS LARGER THAN 10" DIAMETER TO PREVENT IMPEDANCE OF; GAS SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. FITTER (CHECK BOX IF COMPLETE) Work area left in Clean & Safe condition. ❑ Complete all Pipe Tables and Gas Pressure Stamp. ❑ Field changes Red —Lined on cs—built. ❑ Material verified and Changes noted on paperwork. ❑ All Valve & Tie—in Locations noted on as —built. ❑ Note beginning of Main, EOM & Line of Main locations. ❑ Show Rope Locations & Cul—de—sac Radius. ❑ Foreman'. Signature _ Company PILCHUCK DATE STANDARD GAS CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 • FIELD LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EXCAVATOR TO CALL "ONE —CALL" TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, IN WESTERN WASHINGTON CALL: 1-800-424-5555. IN KITTITAS COUNTY CALL: 1-800-553-4344. 2. NOTIFY APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY PRIOR TO JOB START(SEE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS). 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONFORM TO PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS AND GAS FIELD PROCEDURES. 4. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARD PRACTICE 0150.3200 TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 5. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DISTRIBUTE FLYERSALONG WITH LIST OF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF AN EXCESS FLOW VALVE, IF APPLICABLE. 6. ANY CHANGE IN ROUTE, PIPE SIZE/TYPE, TIE—IN METHOD OR ADDITIONAL MAIN FOOTAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 7. COMPLETE "PIPE CONDITION REPORT" ON ALL METALLIC PSE FACILITIES. CHECK BOX ON REPORT FOR WIRE BOX (TEST LEAD) INSTALLATION. 8. PIPELINE MARKERS AND WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2500. 9. INSTALL MAIN VALVES OUT OF TRAFFIC WHERE POSSIBLE. VALVE MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2600 FOR ALL HP VALVES IF THE LOCATION IS NOT READILY ACCESSIBLE, AND FOR ALL VALVES WHERE PERSISTANT SNOWFALL MAY OBSCURE THE VALVE BOX . 10. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL OVERPRESSURE OF ADJOINING SYSTEMS, NO TWO MAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN UNLESS APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 11. SYSTEM MAOP DENOTED BY:1 SYSTEM MAOP = 45 PSIG. 12. GAUGE AND MONITOR USE OF ALL STOPPERS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FEED. 13. RESTORE ALL DRIVEWAYS SUBJECT TO OPEN CUT TO ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION. 14. PURGE POINTS AND PRESSURE TAPS TO BE INSTALLED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3400, AND 2525.1200. 15. MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE TESTED AND PURGED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3300 AND 2525.3400. 16. IF METALLIC PIPE IS INVOLVED, COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH CP TECH. --------------- AT------------ 17. NOTE ALL ACTUAL FOOTAGE, LOCATION AND MATERIAL CHANGES ON THE AS —BUILT IN RED. ( ') DENOTES FOOTAGE BETWEEN FITTINGS. GAS MAIN INSTALLATION/RETIREMENT Type/Work Pipe Size Type Estimated Length Actual Length Manufacturer SCAT. 2" MPE 60, OPEN TREN 2" MPE 250' 1 GAS MAIN PROSSL'RE & TESTING -- TYPE TEST PRESSURE TESTED BY DATE ON TIME ON DATE OFF TIME OFF TYPE TEST PRESSURE TESTED BY DATE ON TIME ON DATE OFF TIME OFF ,Design Press 60 SYS MAOP PROJECT PHASE NOTIF# ORDER# co a O SAP Superior Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Retirement X213034761 107025398 X213038969 Contractor: CONSTRUCTION COST CODES: 051-103-1 Owner / Developer Contact Info SILVER CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. BOX 1417 MUKILTEO, WA 98275 ATTN: JAMIE SCHWARTZ 425-290-7663office Project Manager Contact Information: KIM GRAY 425-290-2678 CELL PHONE kim.gray@pse.com CALL (800) 424-55552 BUSINESS DAYS BEFC PE YOU DIG THIS SKETCH NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR EXACT LOCATIC..4 OF FACILITIES REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT PERMIT CSE EDMONDS REV# DATE BY DESCRIPTION FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE DATE PROJECT MGR KIM GRAY 206-418-4233 ENGR-GAS ly DRAWN BY MLOCK 6-418-4217 11— —05 CHECKED BY - JIM SN 06-418-4220 COUNTY SNOHOMISH EMER SECT 4 GAS WK CTR MNSNHG APPROVED B KIM GRAY 20.6-418-4233 CP TECH. 1/4 SEC SW 05-27-04 OP MAP 156.068 PLAT MAP 157.070 MAPPING JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS _ -_ UTILITIES CONTACT - PHONE# PUGET SILVER CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. SOUND 2" MPE MAIN EXTENSION ENERGY 15711 72ND AVE W DESIGNED BY PILCHUCK CONTRACTORS INC. EDMONDS, WA 98026 SAP Superior Order: 107025398 Drawing Number: N/A SCALE: 1" = 50' PAGE: 1 Li s a 0 0 LO 0 N U O E N s, m 0 Q. 10 C. 1 g90 CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSO MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering October 3, 2006 Mr. Jamie Schwartz 4 Silver City Construction, Inc. PO Box 1417 Mukilteo, WA 98275 RE:Right-of-Way Improvements between 15711 and 15719 72nd Ave W Dear Jamie, This is in response to your letter dated October 2, 2006. You are correct that a property owner does not have a right or entitlement to construct sidewalks in the right of way without City approval. We are aware of no claims or actions to seek administrative remedies through the City by Mrs. Rusnak or her representative at this time. Appeals of permitted private development projects must be filed within the required appeal period per the Edmonds Community Development Code. As I mentioned to you in an earlier conversation, we will need a set of revised plans that shows the correct location of the right-of-way for a quick review and approval. In addition, please indicate the driveway slopes for the 3 houses and indicate how will you handle Rusnak's driveway grade since it appears the new road will be higher than what is currently there? Sincerely, 111WX41WA- LYLE CHRISMAN Engineering Program Manager V:\dvrw\.sp\04-131 Jamie Schwartz ltr re ROW improvements 72nd Ave Oct 06.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • is7u 0 Zzs4 RECEIVED RECEIVED OCT 1 — 2006 Silver City Construction, Inc. OCT 0 2 2006 P. O. Box 1417 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION Mukilteo, WA 98275 206-501-5490 Lyle Crisman, Engineering Department City of Edmonds, 121 Fifth Av. N, Edmonds, WA 98020 October 2, 2006 Dear Lyle, I want to follow up on the voice mail I left you on Friday about the right-of-way improvements on 72"d Ave. With regard to Kent Halvorson's request that I move the center of roadway to the center of right-of-way, I understand from Dave Gebert that the City attorney has responded to this issue by saying that a landowner had no right or entitlement to sidewalks on the City right-of-way. This would appear to leave Mrs. Rusnak no legal basis for requiring me to change the plan. While you were on vacation I was contacted by an attorney for Mrs. Rusnak, as well as by Mr. Halvorson's project manager, Dick Potter, both of whom intimated that they would bring my work to a halt if I did not change my road plan to suit their plans for work in the future on Mrs. Rusnak's property. However, there has been no follow up on their part, and therefore I can only assume that they have lost interest in working on this problem. The meeting that was proposed for Thursday, Sept. 28, did not happen; and I was not contacted by anyone from their side about meeting. If Mrs. Rusnak or her representatives are proceeding with any administrative remedies for their claims through the City, please let me know as soon as possible. Doesn't the City Code provide that a claimant must act in a timely manner, in order to be entitled to this sort of revision in a neighbor's construction plans? On June 14, 2006 I delivered a copy of the plan to Mr. Halvorson in person. I assume that I may proceed with the approved plan for the work. I am instructing my civil engineer, Eric Tietze, to complete the final drawings, which will reflect the plan previously approved by you, with adjustments for changes in topography. I also assume that the cedar tree shown on the approved plan will still be required to be removed. Please, let me know the City's position as soon as possible so that we can set forms for curb and gutter by the end of the week of October 2, 2006. I hope that the City will support me in the plan to proceed. Gratefull , Jamie S DATUM Ex 66M:t RC' ELEVATION , 28226' 0 w cR1E oR IK 6TREET— E, RE 0 cl vz 2 u) w Lu tL kn X. E / CB 5A TYPE / RE 279.. 84 /E 265.84E U u u rn, � � 0 n _ M �o o O ' ao�l�-Dag3 STREET FILE 2 0, rn `cAd, o BUILDING HEIGHT CALCULATION I E 28103 — EDH._i I / DATUM: SSMH 2a2.2&' (P NW CORNER IN STREET �w le-s R E C 80 Foy T EIVE® 1 - ( CABLE I 1 • ~'\ •t'-E" /- BDH OCT 1411005 296' DOVEWAY' OPE , 195 I C:a+zu••e•,( \ IMFEFRVIOUS SURFACE PERMIT COUNTER AC 47 1 BOH - 1 ' "� QUANTITY UNIT � � ' , � �\''' , 2 -m• HOUSE 2854 SF WA TER \ I HATER t"__MR DRIVE 7DD SF i 6 -m 6ERVG:.E ; i .n TDH- / PATIO/WALK 278 SF , i , E111TIp:7y]'E• V J BDH - 3&&2 SF • p TOTAL j ry o , i APPROVED BY PLANNING N 6•:� ; , % \ LOT COVERAGEy 13 12oel� T H _ BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2544 SF I eDH. Tr- I H' i1i;i=_1:'r'; LOT AREA 12000 SF 2 nA'_I GGLO PATIO/ c sr- LOT COVE GE 21 io L'ane P 5- I Z Corner —Fla WOVE = - � � i1,1` ; 8..._. I , TYPIGf1 ' 115h a I I Ix Reguired Actual 1 I, SE ACK I ` ri �mo� / �.m o.yh• ` n 6 \ 2" �,, 4'° L J 1 4 3 _ .� t V) Front */ —�,. a `_ s 1- 1� Sides N / D �31 goy>. -//,. ►\?A* 9� �,, 1 R.919 ear G 27m'-0' _] . \ <,.. BDH: - M.O. Vther 68 3 __ ROG1� m TAH:' BDH. - EX. F Q Gv V = 20'-(d", 15--F+. V•lar sc - = r- M0di•fi•cafi'ay7 erahfrd !� N0- I �° �J 5 -ZOv L-L--, 31 . B TD;' -/ TEA'' 31,.i'-m 82 26 I 2. B POINT IE EVATION_ A -� } , D.D c _�D3.D C 2 `c .D D 23:7.7 TOTAL i177,7 _ -- _ AVG. ELEVATION -_ MAX. BLDG HEIGHT (25 FT.) 294.43� I 319.43 �1 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 �Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ih e 1$c10 Planning • Building • Engineering February 6, 2006 Silver City Construction Jamie Schwartz P.O: Box 1417 Mukilteo, WA 98275 RE: Plan Check 05-484, 15711 72"d Ave SW Request to Exceed Driveway Slope of 14% Dear Mr. Schwartz, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR $r8fir FILE This letter is being sent in response to your request to exceed the maximum allowed driveway slope of 14%, dated October 14, 2005. Review of the submitted letter and site plan indicate that site constraints prevent you from maintaining less than a 14% driveway slope. You have already adjusted the finished floor elevations of the home to achieve a driveway slope of 19.5%, which with approvals meets City code requirements and as a result have been required to comply with SEPA. It is understood that it would not be possible to achieve less than a 14% driveway slope without a significant amount more of excavation on the site. For these reasons, it is found reasonable to allow a maximum driveway slope of 19.5%. Please call the Engineering Inspection line at 425-771-0220, ext. 1326, to schedule your driveway form inspection, prior to pour. If you have any questions regarding these requirements please feel free to contact Jeanie McConnell at 425-771-0220, ext. 1338. Sincerely, DON FIENE, P.E. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER Jm c: Street file Plan Check File #05-484 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • c:...,,_ r:... u..i.:_-_ i____ RECEIVED OCT 14 ?005 Sl'� C� �� N S� 1�j C PERMIT COUNTER �)U)OV P'EQ�<T �s In a\.Juw\f- 01-1 c9-Q��`Q-�-� �' �� �s t'ec1�e� c5� -1 wts Ad 41� v�`���W11� JZQtivJ� • • �6 1 • I � .,: �� :•� :.-, � of s,! � z � � � • ��I. i,r:i+ �� �.,� gyp.-.Q►s .��,�� � ����+ � :� � ' j, • �h �,��r' ��� sill►��Gitt.�.•J■tjt� i�J!■■�■ � � " 9' el�.� ._ �•� ■ttttlipt�ti�t�tttttttC? ■ 1 STANDARD DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET (5000 SF OR LES►3 ,1 CALC. BY: tea` OWNER: ADDRESS: � � � PHONE: C. DATE: n s .c� I I 1_ IMPERVIOUS SUFACE AREAPIPE DIA.� t' PIPE LENGTH ORIFICE FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM RECEIVI OCKING LID (TYP.) RIM ELEV 2—V,G IM ELEV. � rs OCT 141 �0� DETENTION PIPE LENGTH 6" Min. clearance FINISHED Measured from top of RIM ELEV.�T PERMIT COUNT GRADE //' F Conc. box or riser. TIGHTLI --+- 0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE UPPER CATCH BASIN V. ELEV. cW� CONTROL CB TO CITY CONVEYANCE ELE ELEV. ONTROL MIN.N"_C RIFICE 2 X2 X12 DEEP CONTROL CATCH BASIN (4"-6" QUARRY SPALLS OR EQUAL) FROM CONTROL CB—� RIPRAP OUTLET SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO SPREADER TRENCH— PERF. PIPE SHALL BE LEVEL & CAPPED AT ENDS 1 N. 6" COVER C-8 SA INV. ELEV. /Q]• 1 CONTROLCB TRENCH SHALL BE LINED WITH MIRAF1 & ON TOP CITY STORM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM SPREADER TRENCH SHALL BE A MIN. OF 10' LONG AND PERPENDICULAR TO CONTROL CB. WASHED DRAIN ROCKSTREET FILE SPREADIR TRENCH NOTES 1. CALL ENGINEERING DIVISION (771-0220 EXT. 1326) 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR A TIGHTLINE AND DETENTION SYSTEM INSPECTION BEFORE BACKFILLING AND FOR FINAL INSPECTIONS. A VE. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property a owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. (iQ The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. i DATE U • RECEIVED _ pU 1 4 2U05 �STREET FILE IT COUNTER / SU��T�P C.�s�svJcc�oa.I�, ,— i I�« �I -f i I AS NOTED pol)SE / f m U„�i:NSFEA G Date: �. vZoo rwi OWNER/CONTrIAC0 iS ESPONSIR?� E y�2 FCR EROSION AND DAMAC-E ALL EXPOSED SURFACES TO �p ice' 'Fe� COVERED WITHIN 2 DAYS / I- 26,E " 266-26 e U��S N RE$U JAN 12 2006 m SUCITY DEPARTMENT OF EDMONDS t STREET FiLt , CITY OF EDMONDS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant: atof "' Name ` a2k 141� Street/Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone: � �i � 61 " 4 q WORK SHEET �� Applicant Contact Person: Name Street/Mailing Address City Telephone: Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis: N/Pr Firm Name 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Contact Name a. Street address (if known): b. Location: c. Specify existing land use: VI-P 110 d. Specify proposed type and size of development: State Zip Telephone (Attach a vicinity map and site plan.) e. When will the project begin construction and when will it be completed? f. Define proposed access locations: g.. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: Page I Five Years After Opening LOS: With Project: Without Project: Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: 7.. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. SAENGR\Darrell\City Projects\T1A Guidelincs\Traf npAnalyWork 9-04.doc Page 5 1 City of Edmonds, Permit No-J - RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: /c;?'�=�„5 A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 11 %`Z—U C. LO B. Type �ff Work (be specific)::[0 _Tie— 1 V1 (� t,OC.� S \�•1 c�, \ ;� @ E? C e., C,a r1 t b I G Q_cU� `-1I I 1 L ►eve I.. p„a>' c c� �1C,LQ 0-k- y Jug -�_ r -7 G C. Contractor: ��' c t r (k ,I(,;, 11 t Contact: L2_. J,1J fC� I C Mailing Address: 1 �� �}(� k0 A J J Phone (D - State License #: I Le H a a _ 101 WA Liability Insurance: Bond: $ City Business License #: D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer'Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, COMCAST, OVWSD) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: AW tki S /(NYC'FL F. PAVEMENT CUT: J[ ES ❑ NO G. SIZE OF CUT X S CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES ❑ NO ' G. ❑ Mail Approved Permit ❑ Call for Pickup "APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required> by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification' verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with/City code. All,street-cut trench' work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end- of t664or•kilay — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. "CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY O,FnTHE �PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature:, ��Q ��.SCXJt— Date: l Z' O t 1 C)•,rk' v Q e ' v r,• (Contractor or Agent) FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved by: Jaime Hawkins Right-of-way Fee: $160.00 + $15.00 Time Authorized: Void After Februlry / 17)h / 2006 Disruption Fee/Fund 111: $0.0 Special Conditions: Restore ROW to like and/or better condition. Inspection Fee: $50.0 Maintain 5' Min. setback from all City of Edmonds utilities. Verify Total Fee: $225.00 clear bore crossings. Call for locates of all U/G utilities prior to any Receipt No: excavation. Alert affected residents and businesses. Conform to Issued by: • 9 the approved working drawing and Traffic Control plan. Please call the number below to schedule the required inspection(s). Required Inspection: 1) Final ROW restoration REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: ('/ l 1 N U�(�'ii)'1"/ t'�^4 Call 425-771-0220, Ext. 1326 fora 24-hour voice -recorded inspection request line. FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: �����. DATE C.�o CADocuments and Settings\Curtis\My Documents\Forms\Engnrng\ROWpermit_ doc i Revised 10/01/03 STREET FILECk I i C c& 20 Cq C`fI FOOTING DRAINS NOT, TO BE TIED INTO h DETENTION SYSTEM _ q 5� F I APPROVED AS NOTED. / BY EN EKING - r Date: � �g6: � • w '3�0 �6Z �� g ' r /' _`Or, � _ — _ -- ��—lit �_ y. / ./ �~•' I � ,I`�� / /�". .� 111=1 Sk,4 AQ S\nJ ., d ' 43 I. _ LLJ i 1 7A ILZ 917 - N RECEIVED JAN 2 6 2007 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS l� C— cl, g -7 7W, TV\/ . ��- STRE ET F L -_ *w6w4l FOOTING DRAINS NOT TO BE TIED INTO DETENTION SYSTEM vo - E:IVED �0R 355 REC SOH 40 .37 JAN 2 6 2o F81 DEVELOMENT SF RvicES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS APPROV .D A, a rEp BY SIP r 'Date: 4 Y 777T.) -7 j Or q, DETjE.N ? 4 SLAP, A. j 1 01 aij, (Z 3 51c/ \6 77- -12,Y);( AV-,c,— -Okt, MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE V-IEM-�EQ-T-� To F c 1,5'�� c� a ,,; mz-log- -To -0i )P(-�, Oli-� -Tl-hs 5-T-7z,, —+T,-,-WAY GO, S f ri U O P, -;�! AND IN8PECTION REQUIREI., I lS� J. "' 'Ill.. LI_ 1.. !Li Il..`LL! +-+ _\ - kvt-''. -j r A-z2t 1:�.; 6 JIr I i Q ISi 1A �bOTING DRAINS NOT ' TO BE TIED INTO cr ' DETENTION SYSTE I f i I ' I _ o ;tit . � ki a ( S IY I ( N cr) Alothing in this permit`approval. process shall b j J interpreted ae allowing or Pe'rm1 tting the n t maintenance of any currently esistin� illegal, _ �' i W. ry A o >� aonconforming of unpermitted building structure I i' i' I ', 4 11 i A h �) ; u.i j or site condition whit is;outeide.the scope of the ; ; APPROVED Y ING 441 — ppeermit application, regacdleas of whether such ✓ \I hRPROV AEp building, structure or condition is shown on the I `' 1 - - ! I-1 J�:7 - [; site lan or drawing: $uch building, structure or��-` ;� ly <, BY NE 0 - L;-� con 'lion may' be'the subject of a separate - =r. �_) u_ u_1 -� enforcement on. Dec 2 a l'SCOOK is 1 (t►�J oC c LA / 3 / jjW 29-b a8 l__4 _ i - -- r�v.� Z9 2I S LU coo - -A �, _ ! Ir o cc u -' I �. All1. X > . ! y- Gone .....� �'� � - �----Carn�f Setbacks-== Re ucr_ed---------- Actual 1 os „z� X2 Front.. 1.. i �° ss ,; z� ;r� odor 7�ir da; _ .---.—. Sides === - -_- -- - -- - - 12 Rear - - -- - - — -- -- — _ _ Other Height 'I� j" �� yUNVA t-z -C) �C PLANNING CONDITION:, Height of rockeries shall not h exceed three (3) feet in the ��r MAR - 2 2� " setback area as measured S 1 lEE FILE from top of rock to M u erF - f p I I 0 W fe ,zwm eiV� d�-h m S original grade, i BUILDING DEPA ---� 0 f vX A 1 G GL I (" flf 0 vt— . CITY OF EDMONDS DATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS PERMIT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT' APPLICATION JOB _ •�/� /� SKIT APT# ADDRESS NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS SNER C PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. W S �� 13) ING A RESS �q 1 ` 1 LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT PER TESCP Approved O VIA1 ` ` OF WAY OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Pennit Requred \J► il,/\`\Cy` TELEPHONE •� ( \/ EXISTINGROPOSED Street use Permit Required Inspection Required Sidewalk Required �,q J REQUIRED DEDICATION I-, FT FT Undergrou V _ Wiring required KsIAME METER S ZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED l+ I YES i3 NO O Oz U W uWi 0 t APVR&SS n REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE ZIP q N�1�� TELEPHONE W NAME -(� ,CBL# \L / /D` C .l -•_-,• ADDRESS INEERINp REVIEWED BY , . DATE ... r i� (> ',.. 20 Q I ,y:. _ " ' IIJ�J OITY FIRE REVIEWED BY ` ;' DATE s ^rZIP` TELEPHONE l`/f1jD VARIANCE OR CU ' SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION SEPA S ATE LICENSE NUNRIER EXPI T N D E C BY ,�►ny \` ( ��.� V, „ ,l3'� �. � � REQ'D ,O YES COMPLETED O EXEMPT J PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCE NO. CA# — ZONE SIGN AREA ;; HEIGHT - ..WAIVER,. _ ALLOWED -i PROPOSED; ALLOWED PROPOSED Jo - .STUDY ��:, � - � - 2zjt 1 sitil NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING I MECH LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) -PROPOSED , FRONT SETBACKS (FT.) WA IDE REAR ❑ALLOWED COMMERCIAL •�. �J FRONT SIDTE REA N `)Z� i ❑ ADDITION COMPLIANCE OR ❑ Yf f+. / CJ i`� !i .' r 5 1 / 1 r❑ MIXED USE CHANGE OF USE PARKING _ �%` i ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN REQ'D PROVIDED. LOTAREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE a 7! y I�� �j I`�p Dy'I�'v" (7� GRADING FENCE ❑ REPAIR � 12 0a CYDS ❑ ( X FT) 1� REMARKS �p ` rJI rp /1 far aP ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK ❑ OTHER I .✓�.�It%1=. r 11O�II v' I 5-.00y-1�I e l be, a)— GARAGE . ❑ L ❑ WALSPRINKLER ROCKERY FIRE ALARM Vvv l Y,Vl, :Vvv.,4� a (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: i TYPE F STRUCTION ODE OCCUPANT tt GROUP NUMBER NUMBER OF, O OF STORIES DWELLIN_ G : UNITS I SPECIAL INSPEC ION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REQUIRED YES REMARKS .... t, z - C J GEOTEM REP RT BY: G Ll. D 7! m s 145 Ift STR L: D BY: .. VALUATION C 3 Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check —' State Surcharge rJ I HEAT SOURCE LOT SLOPE% 1. VESTED DATE Building Permit a City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: vd-t �_TU v .�Plumbin6, ^ Base Fee THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO Mechanical %7 ✓V % t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC Grading520 ' DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE t SEPARATE PERMISSION. f W PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5) a PERMIT LIMIT. SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) Engr. Inspection + SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION w'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit .01 J IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF M EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # Q ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due r_ = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.. Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC• CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. OF IALS SIGNA 'SEE) RE DATE ENT): DATE SIGNED (425) imG 7 1 -0220 IDATE ` BY ATTNTi6N EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCU BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL r A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110. ORIGINAL -FILE •YELLOW -IN ECTOR PINK -OWNER •GOLD -ASSESSOR 10104 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES G9Ilt EX SSMN RV, FLEVAT04 • ?C226' o W CORNER N STREET — RE 0 � O u Muj �2 a � �B°t�Z -2 A. is EX. CB 5A (TYPE A) RE 273.84 1E 265.84.E SIt. PLAN ' �! �0' \ RESU� STREET FILE BUILDING 1•-IEIGNT CALCULATION mac" ��� �� JAN 12 2006 — — CITY OF EDMO!\ WV `�� _ _ - - !� --- - - -- •- N \\I12.42' 5D11 J - - C O 75m•-m. \ N� POINT ELEVATION A 250.0 B 303t.0 G 2 97. 0 D 267-7 TOTAL 1177.7 AVG. ELEVATION MAX. BLDG I-1EIGN?(25 FT) 294.43 319.43 I E 281.03 r £DN. - ' L OCKED 290 _m• - - DATUM: 55M14 252-26 ` @ NW Cyr I' T � ad (r BO Q: T I ; GABLE5011k OCT 14 2005 MYEWAY,'fifI ,j- OPE , 195 "' I 1 tfip,u•`'•`, I•\ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PERMIT COUNTER T YLS`t ACK , I 1 1 BAH QUANTITY ( UNIT HOUSE 2884 SF WATER METER1 j 6-0 sERVR1-E I' �� / DRIVE 700 SF 276 eD8 ©. 9-6• \ \� sraa coon t t� I ry TD2 / PATIO/WALK 278 SF r ' "`�' a u'•.• I BD.W TOTAL 3&ro2 SF APPROVED BY PLANNING O ;,. 6-o I I I i /�• LOT GOVERAG-E T w .tt rr BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2544 SF a J m !Iji�I rt 27 HDWb LOT AREA 12000 SF i 274 l� GPG. PA110 Y i_ . 1 I; 1 1 I LOT GOVERAGI one �G✓ _ I Z 21 io t I o� Corner — Flag � — !���_,� �ocl�eiv►'ey Sgtb R aired I , TYPICAL _ \/� /� 11 'w 5 1 ,, \� Ci \ a� 5vi A i l U Actual SE ACK I �� L J , , ��s _^ 1 , , A Front ! c�• h{I tl s, 6 m Q-� 47 i1 Bfi• ♦ U 6 \\ � L?J 1 • _ " Sides N 5 2 Z 31 G_ I - BDid_y 790 m S'oY�46• f_9N+ 1 �% Rear 5I i I In e, Sim.W,.- 7�8' rj��-1,oa LKyI. Other Height 22A EX. _ '/�� J - (� rear ///�jj —e' \ BDYI. y y� h C A•41�i1 [�J-h'a1 V'ra 0- ll N� i \2W' \\-� l V 1 1' w• — v Pilchuck Contractors, Inc. a��"•S` Job #107025398 -Nov 29, 2005 Sheet 1/1. J.Crabb'0na"� NOT TO t, SCALE 4 i J p%PPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINE/RING a - _ 9�ATe Z 24 R. NOTICE (�. FOR INSPECTION O CHANNELIZATION DEVICE SPACING MPH TAPER TANGENT 50/70 40 80 35/45 30 60 25/30 20 .40 4 T. 7 W Q 0 Z N n TV Notes: 1. All signs.and spacing to conform to -the MUTCD and City,•of Edmonds' Traffic Control specs. 2: Channelizing•devices; are 28" traffic cones: 3. All signs 'are ` V x 48"'B/O'unless otherwise specified. . 4. Alert affected residents and businesses 5..Work area will be 270' $.of C/L of 156th St SW & 12' E of C/L of 72nd Ave W. E= 156TH ST SW 4 T. 7 W Q 0 Z N n TV Notes: 1. All signs.and spacing to conform to -the MUTCD and City,•of Edmonds' Traffic Control specs. 2: Channelizing•devices; are 28" traffic cones: 3. All signs 'are ` V x 48"'B/O'unless otherwise specified. . 4. Alert affected residents and businesses 5..Work area will be 270' $.of C/L of 156th St SW & 12' E of C/L of 72nd Ave W. E= 156TH ST SW ??' y'k. • • • WORK AREA•2' x 5 • IN SHOULDER' .� �.I 'LEGEND,.,': • •. ' 28' TRAFFIC -CONE ® WORK AREA TRAFFIC�FLOW DEAD CND G!y G TWORKVEHICLE vk 5GN LOCATION} s. GAS PIPE DIRECT BURY CUSTOMER PROVIDED TRENCH NTS 156 TH 20'R/W FUSE TIE—IN 270'S C/L, 2'E—E EDGE PAVING N EX. 5/8" 268'S LO 1988 PROP. 2" MPE IP MAIN 2'E—E EDGE PAVING Ld MAIN ROPES < FROM: __'S C/L,--'E C/L___1 TO: __'S C/L, __'E C/L z PROP. 2 MPE IP MAIN 9'E C/L END, OF MAIN (2" MPE CAP) 580-S C/L, WE C/L ST SW 45'R/W C— I' 40'R 00 C/� I I Ir ao w In 'C I' d qa ' N IX w I V _ J I CO I� N Iv qa qa I 40'R t C PLOT PLAN SCALE: 1" = 50' Q-H 1. IF THE TRENCH BOTTOM CONTAINS ANY SHARP OR UNUSUALLY ROUGH SURFACES, A MINIMUM OF 3" OF INITIAL BACKFILL MATERIAL IS REQUIRED TO BED THE PIPE, UNLESS THE CARRIER PIPE IS ENCASED OR WRAPPED WITH AN APPROVED ROCK SHIELD MATERIAL. 2. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE SAND, NATIVE SOIL, OR SOIL —BASED SELECT MATERIAL THAT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SHARP ROCKS OR ROCKS LARGER THAN 1/2" DIAMETER. SEE PSE SPECIFICATION 1275.1380, "SAND BACKFILL FOR GAS PIPE, ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, AND CABLE. 3. A MINIMUM OF 6" OF INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE GAS PIPE. IF THE NATIVE SOIL CONTAINS ROCKS LARGER THAN 6" DIAMETER, THEN A TOTAL OF 12" OF INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE GAS PIPE. 4. IF THE CARRIER PIPE IS ENCASED, INITIAL BACKFILL IS NOT REQUIRED. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL MEET FINAL BACKFILL MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS. WHERE THE CARIER PIPE ENTERS AND EXITS THE CASING, THE INITAL BACKFILL AND BEDDING REQUIREMENTS APPLY. 5. FINAL BACKFILL MAY BE SOIL —BASED SELECT MATERIAL OR NATIVE SOIL, BUT SHALL BE FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ROCKS LARGER THAN 10" DIAMETER TO PREVENT IMPEDANCE OF, GAS SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. aH qN FITTER (CHECK BOX IF COMPLETE) Work area left in Clean & Safe condition. Complete all Pipe Tables and Gas Pressure Stamp. Field changes Red —Lined on as —built. Material verified and Changes noted on paperwork. All Valve & Tie—in Locations noted on as —built. Note beginning of Main, EOM & Line of Main locations Show Rope Locations & Cul—de—sac Radius. Fore nan's Signature Company PILCHUCK DATE STANDARD GAS CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. FIELD LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EXCAVATOR TO CALL "ONE —CALL" TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, IN WESTERN WASHINGTON CALL: 1-800-424-5555. IN KITTITAS COUNTY CALL: 1-800-553-4344. 2. NOTIFY APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY PRIOR TO JOB START(SEE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS). 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONFORM TO PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS AND GAS FIELD PROCEDURES, 4. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARD PRACTICE 0150.3200 TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 5. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DISTRIBUTE FLYERSALONG WITH LIST OF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF AN EXCESS FLOW VALVE, IF APPLICABLE. 6. ANY CHANGE IN ROUTE, PIPE SIZE/TYPE, TIE—IN METHOD OR ADDITIONAL MAIN FOOTAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 7. COMPLETE "PIPE CONDITION REPORT" ON ALL METALLIC PSE FACILITIES. CHECK BOX ON REPORT FOR WIRE BOX (TEST LEAD) INSTALLATION. 8. PIPELINE MARKERS AND WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2500. 9. INSTALL MAIN VALVES OUT OF TRAFFIC WHERE POSSIBLE. VALVE MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2600 FOR ALL HP VALVES IF THE LOCATION IS NOT READILY ACCESSIBLE, AND FOR ALL VALVES WHERE PERSISTANT SNOWFALL MAY OBSCURE THE VALVE BOX . 10. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL OVERPRESSURE OF ADJOINING SYSTEMS, NO TWO MAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN UNLESS APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE. 11. SYSTEM MAOP DENOTED BY:1 SYSTEM MAOP = 45 PSIG. 12. GAUGE AND MONITOR USE OF ALL STOPPERS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FEED. 13. RESTORE ALL DRIVEWAYS SUBJECT TO OPEN CUT TO ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION. 14. PURGE POINTS AND PRESSURE TAPS TO BE INSTALLED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3400, AND 2525.1200. 15. MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE TESTED AND PURGED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3300 AND 2525.3400. 16. IF METALLIC PIPE IS INVOLVED, COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH CP TECH. --AT------------- 17. NOTE ALL ACTUAL FOOTAGE, LOCATION AND MATERIAL CHANGES ON THE AS —BUILT IN RED. ( ') DENOTES FOOTAGE BETWEEN FITTINGS. GAS MAIN INSTALLATIONIRETIREMENT Type/Work Pipe Size Type Estimated Length Actual Length Manufacturer SCAT. 2" MPE 60' OPEN TRENCH 2" MPE 250' GAS MAIN PRESSURE & TESTING - TYPE TEST 1. PRESSURE TESTED BY DATE ON TIME ON DATE OFF TIME OFF TYPE TEST I PRESSURE TESTED BY DATE ON TIME ON DATE OFFI TIME OFF I.Design Press 60 SYS MAOP PROJECT PHASE NOTIF# ORDER# Q SAP Superior Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Service/Meter Retirement X213034761 107025398 106164417 X213038969 Contractor. CONSTRUCTION COST CODES: 051-103-1 Vicinity Map O WORKING SITE �I O . N 152ND sr Cr "�Mq F S' Yixk . F { A }. � � 156TH 187T1} Si SN;,1rS,, l� Y 1bhTHni- �1I Owner / Developer Contact Info SILVER CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. P.O. BOX 1417 MUKILTEO, WA 98275 ATTN: JAMIE SCHWARTZ 425-290-7663office Project Manager Contact Information: KIM GRAY 425-290-2678 CELL PHONE kim.grayC8pse.com CALL (800) 424-5555 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFCPE YOU DIG THIS SKETCH NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR EXACT LOCATIC..4 OF FACILITIES REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT PERMIT CSE EDMONDS _REV#1 DATE BY DESCRIPTION FUNCTION CONTACT PHONE DATE PROJECT MGR KIM GRAY 206-418-4233 ENGR - GAS DRAWN BY MLOCK 6-418-4217 tt— —os CHECKED BY JIM SN 06-418-4220 COUNTY SNOHOMISH EMER SECT 4 GAS WK CTR MNSNHG APPROVED B KIM GRAY 206-418-4233 CP TECH. 1/4 SEC SW 05-27-04 OP MAP 156.068 PLAT MAP 157.070 MAPPING JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS _ - UTILITIES CONTACT •-- PHONE# PUGET SILVER CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. SOUND 2 MPE MAIN EXTENSION ENERGY 15711 72ND AVE W EDMONDSWA 98026 DESIGNED BY PILCWUCK CONTRACTORS INC. , SAP Superior Order: 107025398 Drawing Number: N/A SCALE: 1" 50' PAGE: 1 1 a LO M 0 Ln N U U 0 E N s, m v 0 a