Loading...
16000 75TH PL W.PDF111111111111 6062 16000 75TH PL W EscHA 0 7-1 ADDRESS: f (O ©©� �i• 141 TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: ©���✓ I ©Z ` l �� BUILDING PERMIT (NEW COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS: iw6w.sT DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver ' DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: L ` 7:�9 PARKING AGREEMENTS DA EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS lj#Nj 1K&1rc1N1m "Z 07/coZ8 / AWrMM PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: Z SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: -/ / i C-7-10 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: 1*0�61,owowf 1de,4G& LOT:_ BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: ! / SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: 40,333 GEOTECH REPORT DATED: TJ r30^ v / STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: Mgt &O/r r)C qo--l& 3D1 29 /3cp6,ot vala✓ eoMP1-ere- P�riTi2e cow L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc ' _ rco+Ir�uwe ygr,,L�a.7pq•. _-------- FFFFzidstts`iF.3..t'! ° IF y. .s 33 36 it e — — '•aF'.'6 ' ff '- 5 _ -"-_— ...-----__-- - r+.TEvE ywP4GN•iwA - •'1{.i-F.'-; E.:F'll :• 'i 31iE:'=F:F's: \� \�_efa LING 11o.Dt. R�1s1•.►' O 1•!I'YLr i .39 7 i P l _Hit- v 48 — , I. 1 o. Gp 71 p g yQC`t .D .IL ...3 rat• .. .. ..y!l .. .. .. atAV�.`w `.v • �-•-_--- _.fa �.-Lj [ -� �Glew a* • ya- - let..4it fj' � � � r i- • • • E� t ♦ 9 Nor•,; ,T"e rv. r �4 T_. R V • �� A IVEW IZEBIDENCB FOR ROBERT E. YOUNG ASSOCIATES • AFK3-4rMC_r PAUL AND LINDA ELLIOTT SEAT NORTH 1161t 9T. 1To616.!•aSYT 111 NORTLE. WA. "1376. i•2:3122 E D M O N D 8! W A A3 H I N G T O N TM f�v.,e K �i��_ k „ , r+: �fYj'^.^-..—�.,_ t�'-'.� •%��7 ... -._ .__........, _�._..� �~ 1MT)°�r'AR Y�I'fM1l4R"'M11yR�.'+iOile{'�'RY/W.'VR,PRS+'ww.-.... �-T— _ A: r.'� / `4' 96 TEE7-pkE USE ':PERMd i "'� CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE NUMBER I ' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION IJ�75-20 • - JOB A SUITE OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS y/�� �� fNO, /LID -- -�� L: t LEGAL DESCRIPTIO(NaCHECK , ��) SUBDIVISION NO. ., w 30 MAILING ADDRESS /],r /r _ /j'n ' Y l• , . �� TESCP ' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER L® APPROVED BY - EXISTING J REOUIRED DEDICATION 17-7 q11 NAME +••. PROPOSED C7 /O^1 Z ~ , L) 1 V RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REOUIREDX w "j STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED 0 ADDRESS Z H U i o 1 7�fi Z REVIEW BY 0 q SEE NGINEERING MEMO DATED CITY . ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER / - 0 7/71 ' 33 S 2--�I`�2 REMARKS S �D/��%/,� NAME - .4 ' C &/Vs " M ADDRESS I*AJAC. 6-vr 4'e; U ZCITY METER SI E BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER W O .; REM 3 STATE .LICENSE. NUMBER, U �"� '.J, SIGIJ AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. AM ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMCP Legal Description of Property - Iric(u a I easements, „ Z �1 .r S HORELINE # (show below or attach two copies) fit,` o CL it CL RE U A 1 C.46D VARIANCE OR CU PL4tUNG REVIEW BY DATE a SETBACKS - FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAGi Z -1 FRONT f r SIDE Io REAR% 2- ` I : 7" a _� Tax Account Parcel No ,o--� REMARKS a CJ NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDIALTER 0 COMMERCIAL MECHAY�AL ` REPAIR APT. BLDG. SIGN f n EXCAVATE, FILL FENCE CH CtC�q$y TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT ' h• � I/j// 1 DEMOLISH OR GRADE (x-FT) e?5 •";% ❑ CARPORT SWIM SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REMODEL'' GARAGE POOL "i REQUIRED GROUP R3 LOAD WOOD WALL/ ❑ RENEWAL REMARKS ❑ NO - / j NSERr (A 0 ROCKERYG (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPCAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 s C. 1+41 L G� //-,w"sTWArno✓ m rn NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER F E m,44 ��4 k /Y&� 0 02 DWELLING - NATURE OF WORK'TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE 11Z L'16 ra ~ y BUILDING '��� •, qQS �r p o �S a�AKM7-fty PLUMBING C� Plan Check No. MECHANICAL �J This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL , 76 Any construction on the public domain (curt:s, sidewplks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year- Provided Work is Started Within'180 Days "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold J harmless the City of Edmonds, WiNington, its officials, �ta from 60( � employees, and agents any and all claims.)p.r damages of /✓ 40W1 a whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from4the issuance = of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT omodify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance JW x nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance Sp TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." _ � f( I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is ti n Insurance. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SI UR (OW ER OR AGENT) i DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT CITY OF �OFFICICS SIGNATURE EDMONDS T/jE /4T--ENT��N• CALL FOR RELE E DA E INSPECTION 7 9 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR. STRUCTURE NSPECTIO 1 UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL —_File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF F OCCUPANCY HAS .BEEN GRANTED. UBC : CHAPTER 3—OINK — ' ` ''-• � .: Owner GOLD —Assessor ,.v.�»-'^"+�.,s..�r-. a� �-1�+..'titr � a� ,-�, A '7F'�l ��'� t ,�•�,,�y�y �k-T'� WEET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT �g 90_199° PERMIT to.. 3333 Address of Construction: 16 Colo / 5 Property Legal Description (Include all easements): RECEIVED LYNNWOOD LINE Owner and/or Contractor: il�fjA6 ; � LIX MA) State License No. Llzf2g/ G/f CAK 159, /J Building Permit No. Nd Single Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: 2"No ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property: VNo ❑ Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I cerfify that I haver d and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. q- 30- 9 Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-3202, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permit Fee: 3c% • C90 Issued By. Trunk Charge: �� Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Lid No.: r-? l U Partial Inspection: Date -Initial - Comments Reason Rejected: Date Initial IFinal Inspection Approved: Date-�i Initiald ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Bull Copy: Applicant Revised MID 0 0 O V m (9 0 �I���IIUI. YVII ��ff r, 0-^t-p Cif U C;�i ct E` (9n, c:,,:. ow3 do'no. C. �hL _ API"y _ (: .. .. CT r.,Ci 0 0 m , STREET FILE AUG 3 11990 PERMIT COUNTER HYDROLOGY REPORT AND CALCULATIONS PAUL ELLIOTT Edmonds, Washington Group Four Job No. 89-3033 PREPARED FOR: PAUL ELLIOTT C/O ROBERT E. YOUNG 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, WA 98133 PREPARED BY: GROUP FOUR, INC. 16030 Juanita -Woodinville Way N.E. Bothell, WA 98011 . ` mac` /`L.` 'e�r'" ��^� �; July 31, 1990 `t PAUL ELLIOTT 89-3033 Page 1 of 1 7/31 /90 GENERAL SITE. DESCRIPTION The subject property, which consists of 0.4 acres, is located west of the 75th place and Meadowdale Road intersection. The site slopes generally to the west with an average grade of 23 percent. A house and an asphalt walkway currently exist on the site. The existing house is located near the southwestern property corner, while the asphalt walkway runs along the southern property line. The site is primarily vegetated with a mixture of tall grass and blackberry bushes, with the exception of some scattered trees located along the northern pi operty line and near the southeastern property corner. EXISTING DRAINAGE Runoff is currently overland to the west, were flow exists the site over the western property line. Upon exiting the property, flow enters a drainage ditch along the eastern side of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. An existing 24 inch drainage pipe system currently runs southwesterly under the asphalt walkway, which is located along the southern property line. PROPOSED DRAINAGE The proposed conveyance system will be sized for a 25 year storm using the rational method. Undetained runoff from developed areas will be conveyed westerly, exiting the property over the western property line. Runoff is undetained due to the projects location with respect to the sound, which intercepts this developed flow. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Discharge from the development is into an existing rock -lined ditch, located on the eastern side of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. This ditch (dimensions: 2 foot wide bottom, 2:1 side slopes, 1-2 feet deep) conveys flow southerly for roughly 85 feet at 3.1 percent slope. At this point, flow enters an 18 inch concrete pipe located roughly 370 feet north of the Laebugton Warf entrance. This culvert conveys flow westerly for approximately 50 feet, crossing under the railroad tracks before discharging into the sound. Inspection of the downstream system revealed no evidence of scouring, erosion, or overtopping. The 18 inch culvert crossing the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks is partially clogged, and will need to be cleaned out upon future development of the subject property. %t • MEADOWDALE L_ — —i — - - I— — BEACH I PARK Q . LU O 3 3 a J SITE o a a 160TH ST SW LAEBUGTON WHARF �r_ CO (D CO h v 164TH ST SW 164TH ST SW Q� RO 3 3 MEADOWDALE > ; PLAYFIELDS ' cn MEAOOWDALF '---- --- ---- ' m 'n° �EpON RO 168TH ST SW VICINITY MAP No Scale + 1 to 494 •■ 492 a--1 • \ ■ i '7 ■ �ad a o ! N�t ► .. 1 I � -• ,�_ .) • ! ' 1. I \ O -'..- \ _- (t i t L ■ i ! 1 Av \ Pill OLr \� i ` rr • ; I �. \ ' COAST GU VD r -� ';i ` %` I J �■ :jiyl�r ��` \,\. �s TIO ' L r O �i t7 - �j j� ( •`�\ 1■ f r ` I '� �G2 i I I i \!:� - ■ 1 - \ J S'� !_ _ \\_" :- ■ _ •/ ■ ■� a aa- II; I - Drive is ,4�0 k + 1 1 r ■ ', 1. _•%1 \ �`1 � ' �� � � : I • no :.•,• � ( ) � ■ I ii l ■�, :•/ rr:I � `h r^ � n : III - • � _ �• 1. .I� �! / � �{ 'I. I �• ■ \\. '. II On � '■ ■3' 1+ �r'' `I (ra I'■■■��.■ ■ it � L —'� � ■ • • � 'I III) I !I --- ��-� .l r ■ ■ � ■ • + Vi ti oo M ��?e ark - ■ f� - 0 I.sea 7. • •180 . BASIN MAP pri r .f. - II - f i - I I t ■ �-T ■ 4, s 1 S ,'ICI 1 i� ■ .L ♦ ■ ■ 4 ■ J •,r L r t' ■ I r• I ■ . l+ 1 I •frr, r'� ,e • �. •' .I I •- IIC> W 4 ^ o O C� TO o O O o ��tigc tiTq� 4 3 Q: o �� •" O � d C F'�Fi�iF C� p C3 NT 0 0 N o 1 o 0 0 _ r2� o 0 0oTc . C%l . •_ N n? N nJ N N '� NTR s T G o 0 INUl - R 0 0 0 � o � �qc�� Q N N N N /) oa .. po O1q�FT 6� - s � LF ti C" p OFA v Ty . rn a �: a o r z I v N CA t v1 (S7' N -n rn o � oo -a RUN OFF C—*F F IG► VN T� N R-E�4hll In AZ P\3 J .w L ELLIOTT g ' -17- 90 C,Ko FZUN DFF C.DEFFICA W-T (0.0b)(p.9D) -+ ( 0.93) fo.Z5) 33 �-P.WN (0, 09 ) 0.06 Rc, PAVEMEIT (0,00(0.10)t- (0.05)(0,15) 0.jl)�b Pc, FOKC.S T" (o .IL - ) 90% RDOF5 (O.OS)(O,gO) + (0.00(0-- O) 100/, LAWN5 (0,09) ro - I� -I I � I �I .III _I� [��� T1 1_� I I I_ I _I I T 1 I I % I - 1 II. 1 I I I ._ __- V RUNOFF FACTORS,FOR STORM SEWERS (Values of "C" in 0 = CIA) FLAT 0-5% UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood& Forest ................................. 0.10 Sparse Trees & Ground Cover ................... 0.15 1"light Grass to Bare Ground .................... 0.20 DEVELOPED AREA ROLLING 5% 0.15 0.20 0.25 Pavement & Roofs .............................. 0.90 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots ................... 0.75 0.80 City Business ................................. 0.85 0.90 Apartment Dwelling Areas ...................... 0.80 0.85 Industrial Areas.(Heavy)....................... 0.70 0.80 Industrial Areas (Light) ....................... 0.60 0.70 Earth Shoulder ................................. 0.50 0.50 Playground .................................... 0.25 0.30 Lawns, Meadows & Pastures ..................... 0.20 0.25 Parks & Cemeteries ............................ 0.15 0.20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) 1.0 - 1.5 DU/GA.......... ..................... 0.30 1.5 - 3.0 DU/GA................................. 0.35 3.0 - 3.5 DU/GA................................. 0.40 3.5 - 4.0 DU/GA................................. 0.45 4.0 - 6.0 DU/GA.................................. 0.50 6.0 - 9.0 DU/GA................................. 0.60 9.0 - 15.0 DU/GA..........................:...... 0.70 m 18�� L-aetxiSfoj?'cVl;Fiarf � •` • .�••.. I _ C LVER.'z i I.E. 0.81 as LF- I /�$-- CULjVERT --P3 moo = CF:S CULVERT >z 0 ,$-- Area Contrbuting to 18" Culvert Ct. c a p y= Z p L F CD. t63_Acres I.E.. 14.23 t OUTLET NOT FOUND CD - (SUBMERGED) T �9t�n SITE \� r 4 Northern 18 Existing pr swaie \. 2115TPi,. Existing ous, I. t s b 0 N • u4 cn CC Ul Lu roo) Tj Ul Cf) to Cq Cl) 0 0 Ul W C-4 CL w w Z. LL,] .00 _. -f W Cl) Cl) U) @ ul W w w w W cc U) w ,c ._ wi O x Cl) ...... ... ....... -"C44 =mom so= N. CL ui UJ . OJ co w CC Ul 4 ul 0) r. C' Q a1' Q M' w tu w LO. r) a r- x A LLA U) 1— ui / Or 'I ice- .�� '� —_.. LU co UJ 4Z�L Cl) 0 OD 01 e. — y O f-. Pig r 0 X w _ f� c�J Z Q O, �� ci . w ui C4O ;t O _ Lu Cl) CL LLI 3:1- O 0 cc W C) > 6, cr- w W w �W��� z z _ O w 0 -Ve I � vle v cr) w .. ...... . ... . ..... ------ - --- - --- ------- .... ....... . ..... Ul 7- -P . ... . ...... - --- --- .. .... ..... . ....... z A *: 7d -All ni �- I ul LLI APPENDIX BNRR APPLICATION AWV BURLINGTON0 APPLICATION FOR PIPE LINE PERMIT NORTHERN RAILROAD File No. To BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY Date August 10, 1990 1. At -what City or Villiage is permit desired? City of Edmonds 2. Full name and address of Applicant Paul Ell iott c/o Robert E. Young & Associates Phone No: 542-3192 1 1 10 N. 175th St., Seattle, WA 98133 3. If Applicant is a corporation, in what state incorporated? If an individual, under what firm name is business conducted? Pau 1 E 1 1 i of t Res i Bence If partnership, give name of all partners 4. Product to be handled in pipe line Storm Drainage 5. Pipe Data: CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE a. Outside diameter 23" f. Actual working pressure n/a b. Inside diameter 1811 g. Type of joint n/a c. Pipe material concrete h. Coating n/a d. Specifications i. Method of installation EXISTING and grade unknown i. Will cathodic protection e. Wall thickness 2. SI I be provided? n/a 6. a. Depth of pipe under track (top of tie to Top of casing) Approx. 30" b. Angle of crossing 90 degrees c. Is crossing to be in a City Street no 7. If pipe is to be placed longitudinally with track, give a. location of pipe in relation to centerline of nearest track n/a b. depth of coverage (ground line to top of pipe) n/a 8. If installation is to be byjacking or boring method give details of jacking and receiving pits and cross sectionial view. a. Depth n/a b. Distance facing wall of pit to centerline of nearest track (measured normal) n/a c. Minimum distance from center line of nearest track and face of boring pit will be 25 feet.. 9. If Reference plans (to be forwarded with original application) Group Four, Inc. (Ray .Miller) a. Drawing Number sht. 2 of 2 b. Prepared by 16030 Juanita -Woodinville Way NE Bothell, WA 9 011 Applicant agrees that if installation requires any or all of the following work; removal and replacement of track bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging, engineering and/or supervision; such work is to be performed by railway employees and the cost borne by Applicant. If in the opinion of the Railway Company sufficien hazar is involved the Applicant will be required to furnish liability and property damage insurance in form and unts ��isfac to Bu i to orthe Railroad Company. By P/�CV1... OTT �� 1�=..t.�, 1 (Applicant) (Title) RECOMMENDATIONS: (If additional space is required attach supplemental sheet) A permit is desired which would allow developed runoff from a single family residence to be conveyed to the Puget Sound through an existing ditch and existing conc. culvert approx. north of Meadowdale Marina a. .a. Laebugton arSee attached map and calculations. Date August 10 19 90 APPLICATION APPROVED: (Superintendent) (Asst. Vice President —Operations) (Regional Manager Engineering) FORM 16002-N" Pacific Divn.4-89 Printed In U.S.A. 1 0 . 2 The area that contributes flow to consists of 1.63 acres and is shown i Basin Map. The culvert is located Laebugton Wharf and runoff from the culvert in a drainage swale that run the Burlington Northern railroad. F Puget Sound. The area was analyzes basin runoff and the runoff that will site is developed. Flows.were calci storm using the Rational Method. entering the 18" culvert was found consists of 0.43 acres and when de existing flow by 36% to 0.83 cfs. Be PAUL ELLIOT GROUP FOUR JOB 189-3033 8-8-90 CRO the existing 18" culvert i red on.the City of Edmonds approximately 350' north of basin is conveyed to the a along the eastern side of Low is then discharged into to determine the existing occur when the Paul Elliot elated for a 25-year design the flow that is presently to be 0.61 cfs. The site veloped, will increase the :ause the outfall of the 18" culvert could not be located during an on site drainage inspection, a worst case slope of 1/2% was used in the analysis. The culvert was found to have a capacity of 8.05 cfs. The increase in flow that will occur as a result of the proposed development represents only 10% of the pipes existing capacity. Therefore, the 18" culvert is more than adequate and will easily accomodate these proposed flows. 1�1 I* . 0 9 3 P1 a'T r VICINITY MAP PP<UL E L.I oT T -It-- �5q - 3033 gio/90 cRo I CAL.CULP. I=XIsTING RUNOFF To 1B3" CULVER-F coNTR IE�UT-ING P.RE/\- = 1,(03 P,C RUN OFF CDEFF ICI ENT; NP,FP " C-" VP•I_UE EX15T1NG RONDW/�Y 0, 03 iRC O.gc) x� s r1I�IG HaUSE= ` �N I=D O. O L AG 0,90 UNDEVELOPED VV00De, � FOKE5T_ rU , G_ I Ncl 0.15 (R, UNDEVEL-OPED SPA P_SE-FRF-E.S 0 . ID I NG O. LO (K, C,iRAV EL 0.O b Pic. o , 80 'C TIME OF f=LovV LF,--Nc;-T 1 Z50, P:v b . SLOP E = Z0 °i T� _ (10rnin) + (Z50 TO = (3,5 min CI,ZVVS) Ipo5cr_/min) Tf F RCUI D I TCN TO c.0 LV F PT = �- (o K = 15 (FOCI L_i N F.o oITL44 ) (o. oos ) L = 2-80 +t T-t = (z..50) = 4.4-0 (00 (15 (0. 005)" Tc = (4.4m*io) _ -17.9m►n = i� 5 min 1-4 INi ENSIW F12(DM I DF CURVE I -OR sNPHON'�ISH CauNTY (25 ` K STDIZM = 1.70 25 RUN of F r-:_x ( sTl N G Qx►snNc� = CAA = (0.zz)CI.To)(I.b3) ­1 o. (olcfs 5 LING ) L 'I N (a. 11 c I, TC, Dr_Xl�T Pr�uL F�uorT • �8q - �033 B�qO cRo CALCULP\-FE Pgc)PosED ?UNOFF TO 18" cULy�_KT' CONT,leI-MNCi 1,03 MG {RUNOFF CDEFFIc-I F--N f= DESr, 1 PT1ON C.„ \/,,LUF 0.D5 i',' b1 SEE5Uj5N,IN) 0,51 0. O Z p, I MMP 0.60 O.OZ INZ O. is 0.14 A 3 0 .47" 0.00, l,-4- 0.63 o.DL pE01� 0.90 0. � 3 1-AYv N 0, ?-5 _O.Olb GITV1=l- --5HOvLDEK 0.50 o . 40 T-KEFs (KOLLIN) O. zC O. l00 uNDEVEs o�>^D Fr,_��T�`R�L L►Nj O. 7D-h.L p,RF:p. = I. b3 P\c, VqE IU+`l4ED G = 0.4Q/1. (05 T 1 M F— OF CON c .ENTRWTI O N Tc,= I$ m i n 1 N-1-EN s l TY I . TO RUNOFF DEEVE.LOPGD QDF..vELOP�O - CI.A = (0.3,ox1,70)(I,.63) = 0. S3 cf�s A G QDFV ! �'fii PkU L ELL I OT # 69 - �033 g/locto uzo I3�3 3)j C)s LC.0 LP�T-E.y r FX 1 STl N C-T � aj„ GU Ly E Ri d= G ©.5% n= o. o 1 2 (co N c P E.rE P i FE) Qu"ep.cITy _ 9- 05 cfs THE OUTFF.LL WPS NOT LOCPTED \ N DR�1N��CaE �i�SP�LTiDN, T-H�-RErFoR�. � WO►�ST CASE St-OPE OF %29/� /ILL 6� USEt7 TD DFTF-R(MiNf -PieF- CNFrINLITY S , 05 c f5 > 0.53 cf.5 OIL ✓ Q pF-Vf_I-omp ' O N L`r 10.3 o Gp\ PC-C <Y OF TRE- VIPF_. C NLCU LPTF_ OF E X f 51-1 N& PK f,, I N A-.6i E 1� - d dAcruAL �. N(-Tuat_ = 0 , f)3 cf5 I z-/. 5 cfs 6 17 b= Z' y=z� n = o. o35 Q Ct�PAu `► Y (OPC UR L- O F\ ✓ i 1 - 7 RUNOFF FACTORS YOR STORM SEWERS (Values of "C" in 0 = CIA) FLAT ROLLING 0-5% 5% UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood & Forest ................................. 0.10 0.15 Sparse Trees & Ground Cover ................... 0.15 0.20 I,:ight Grass to Bare Ground .................... 0.20 0.25 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement & Roofs .............................. 0.90 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots ................... 0.75 0.80 City Business ................................. 0.85 0.90 Apartment Dwelling Areas ...................... 0.80 0.85 Industrial Areas -(Heavy) ...................... 0.70 0.80 :Industrial_ Areas (Light) ...................... 0.60 0.70 1-',ar.th Shoulder ................................ 0.50 0.50 Playground .................................... 0.25 0.30 Lawns, Meadows & Pastures ..................... 0.20 0.25 Parks & Cemeteries ............................ 0.15 0.20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) 1.0 - 1.5 DU/GA....................... ........ 0.30 1.5 - 3.0 DU/GA................................. 0.35 3.0 - 3.5 DU/GA................................. 0.40 3.5 - 4.0 DU/GA................................. 0.45 4.0 - 6.0 DU/GA.................................. 0.50 6.0 - 9.0 DU/GA................................. 0.60 9.0 - 15.0 DU/GA................................. 0.70 18 . .v do Lu Lil 1 a J I 0 I 0 GEOTECH � CONSULTANTS ���7111FETFILE 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 16000 7-:57 � August 30, 1989 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 JN 89300 (206) 343-7959 Seawood Homes Inc. 7500 - 212th SW, Suite 210 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. Lee Atkinson Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Single -Family Residence 75XX Block, Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the single-family residence to be constructed on the lot northwest of the intersection of 75th Place West and Meadowdale Road in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our work was to explore site conditions and provide earthwork and foundation design criteria. The subsurface conditions encountered by our explorations consisted of 1.5 to 4.5 feet of loose fill soils. overlying wet, loose to medium -dense sands with variable silt content. Below the sands, a blue -gray, firm to medium -stiff silt was encountered. Although the site is on an ancient landslide, we believe that it is now relatively stable. To reduce differential foundation settlement to an acceptible level, we recommend the home be supported on a rigid grid foundation. Footing drains, free -draining backfill behind retaining `walls, and other subsurface drainage control methods, as detailed in this report and as determined in the field during excavation will be required. The attached report presents our study and recommendations. If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. "'�/Z'c �)64Us Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 75XX BLOCK, MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This report represents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed single family residence in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located northwest of the intersection of 75th Place West and Meadowdale Road. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Based on preliminary information furnished to us, we anticipate that the residence will consist of an "L" shaped, single -story structure with a daylight basement. We anticipate the house foundations will be placed at an elevation near the existing grades. Development of the property is in the planning stage and, therefore, only conceptual plans were available to us. The site plan given to us included the plot boundaries, located the existing structure, and provided topographic information. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The irregularly -shaped property is located downslope (west) of 75th Place West, between the roadway and the Burlington Northern Railroad. A paved access trail runs along the southern property boundary. North and south of the site is undeveloped. There is currently an older unoccupied home with an unattached shed sitting on the lot. Portions of the property have been previously graded. There are some larger trees on the lot, along with blackberry brush and other shrubs. Drainage is fair to good to the west. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating three test pits and drilling one boring at the approximate locations shown on the Site Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was determined based upon the proposed construction, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 2 site topography, the required design criteria, subsurface conditions revealed during excavation and drilling, and time and budget constraints. The boring was drilled on July 31, 1989, using a truck -mounted hollow -stem auger drill owned and operated by Pearson Drilling. Samples were taken at five (5) foot intervals using a standard penetration sampler. This two-inch outside diameter split spoon sampler is driven into the soil with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. The test pits were also excavated on July 31, 1989 with a rubber -tired backhoe owned and operated by Clifton's Backhoe Service. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits and test boring, and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket.. The Test Boring Log is attached to this report as Plate 3, and the Test Pit Logs are attached as Plates 4 and 5. The boring was drilled on the east side of the property adjacent to 75th Place West. Below 3.5 feet of sandy fill, the boring encountered a soft silt to eleven feet. From eleven to seventeen feet, this silt graded into a clayey silt/silty clay and became slightly more firm. There were fine sand lenses in this layer, and also below twenty-seven feet. From seventeen to twenty-eight feet the subsurface became a moist clayey silt. Below twenty-eight feet this silt became very stiff to hard. The boring was terminated at forty-nine feet below existing grades. The three test pits were excavated on the property near the location of the planned home. Generally, the subsurface at the proposed building site consists of fill soils, underlain by loose to medium -dense sands, which are underlain by firm to medium -stiff clayey silt/silty clay with sand lenses. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pits and boring logs are interpretative descriptions based on the conditions observed during the excavation. The logs should be reviewed for specific subsurface information at the locations tested. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 3 GROUNDWATER Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of nine to eleven feet below existing grades. The test boring and pits were left open only for a short time period, therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not be the location of the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater, levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We anticipate that groundwater could be found between the near surface coarse -grained loose to medium -dense soils and the underlying fine-grained denser soils. CONCLUSIONS AND.RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The property is located in the middle of a large slump block which encompasses the entire neighborhood. The slump block probably slid within the last 10,000 years, during the retreat of the last glacial age. There are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. However, the risk to developing and residing on this piece of property is no more than the risks which the neighbors assume by living in this area. We believe the project is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The home should utilize a rigid grid foundation as the surficial soils are loose and variable. We expect that conventional shallow footings, if utilized on this site, will subject the structure to greater than typically acceptable differential settlements. . We recommend that the structure be supported on a rigid mat foundation to decrease this risk. The alternative is to place the structure on auger -cast concrete piers. We have not discussed pier foundations in this report, but are available to discuss this alternative should you wish to consider it. Drainage of surface and subsurface water is the other major concern on this project. Due to the relatively impermeable nature of the underlying silts, we expect groundwater levels to rise significantly in the overlying sands during the wetter winter months. Geotech Consultants Inc. should be given the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that site specific foundation, drainage, and earthwork requirements are met. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 4 FOUNDATIONS The proposed structure may be supported on a rigid mat foundation. The mat can consist of a reinforced, two-way beam and slab set on a minimum of one foot of structural fill built up from native soil. A modulus of subgrade reaction of nine (9) pounds per cubic inch should be used in design. Overexcavation of fill soils below the mat will be required. Fill placed under the mat should extend outwards from the edge at least a distance equal to the depth of fill underneath the mat. The perimeter of the mat should be founded a minimum of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent outside finish grade. The mat should be designed in such a manner that ten feet of the mat in any direction could cantilever. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total settlement of the mat founded as recommended will be about three-quarters of an inch, with negligible differential settlements. Much of the settlement due to dead loads from the building structure should occur during construction. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure on the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must either be poured "neat" against the existing soil or the wall backfill must be compacted structural fill. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used between the structural foundation concrete and the supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of undisturbed native soils and well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a fluid having a density of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). PERMANENT RETAINING AND FOUNDATION WALLS Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommendations are for walls less than twelve feet high which restrain level backfill. If higher walls are desired, or if the backfill is sloping uphill, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Walls, restraining level backfill, that are designed to yield an amount equal to at least 0.002 times the wall height can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of forty (40) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, a uniform force of one hundred (100) GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 5 pounds per square foot (psf) should be added to the equivalent fluid pressure force. For calculating the base resistance to sliding, we recommend using a passive pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid having a density of three hundred (300) pcf and a coefficient of friction of 0.35. These values assume that no hydrostatic pressures act behind the wall and that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Retaining and foundation walls should be backfilled with compacted free -draining granular soils containing no organics. The wall backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay and no particles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Alternatively, a geotextile drainage product such as Miradrain or Enkadrain may be used. The purpose of the backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. Where the backfill is to support walks or other slabs, we recommend that the backfill consist of clean sand and gravel as this soil would be easier to compact in the excavation prism than siltier soils. Also, these soils will provide drainage behind the wall. The top foot to eicjhteen inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. SITE DRAINAGE We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of the mat and earth retaining walls. Roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. The footing drains should be surrounded by at least six inches of one -inch -minus washed rock. The rock should be wrapped with non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the mat or crawl space and it should be sloped for drainage. A typical footing drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 6 compacting the surface soils to reduce the infiltration of rain into the soils. The slopes should be covered with plastic. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. Groundwater was observed during our field work at depths of nine to eleven feet. However, seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and if encountered, the water should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe or French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. In no case should excavation slopes be steeper or greater than the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of four feet in unsaturated soils may be attempted vertical. For slopes having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1.25:1 (horizontal: vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. All permanent cut slopes into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2.5:1 (H:V). Granular fill slopes should not exceed 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, existing fills, and any other deleterious material. Stripped materials should be removed from the site or, if desired, stockpiled for later use in landscaping: The stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under buildings, pavements, walkways, or other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads. Geotech GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 7 Consultants, Inc. should observe site conditions prior to fill placement. The surficial site soils are moisture -sensitive and can become very soft when wet and disturbed. We recommend that, if possible, the site preparation and earthwork be performed in the normally dry season of the year when earthwork would generally be less expensive and require less effort. Structural fill under floor slabs and foundations should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to a density equal to or greater than 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks and behind retaining walls should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed eight (8) inches in loose thickness. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 sieve. The percentage of particles passing the 200 sieve should be measured on that portion of the soil passing the three-quarter inch sieve. On - site soils are not suitable for structural fill. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in the report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soils encountered in the test boring and test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions of the site. If, during construction, subsurface conditions are found which are significantly different from those observed in the boring and test pits, or assumed to exist in the excavations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and GF.OTWH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 8 cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in borings or test pits. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain, a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project and for the exclusive use of Seawood Homes, Inc. and their representatives. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend that this report- in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. ADDITIONAL SERVICES It is recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and project specifications. It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommen- dations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the GF)OTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 9 contractor. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during placement of structural fill to observe the process and to conduct density tests in the fill. The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Plan Plate 3 Boring Log Plates 4 - 5 Test Pit Logs Plate 6 Grain Size Analysis Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail •��.�.����'� Respectfully submitted, R. F so �F` s GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • f ; Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer /OMAI E10010 f� ames R. inley, Jr. P.E. Principal Attachments MKD/JRF:cvb GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1142ND PL Vu F 13 1143RD I t id 1 PUGET MA B�AC H , NORM EAOH �L1� au= T I<IPo FISHERPf N1511SST ,�1 I 1WTH �s 152ND ST AT iADO t .� I1;i�TH�SI�: ;►�.� T" 1 _.. $ITE 16fTH 'iAFevc -1— WHARF R _ > I = PL EVv$ t. 11 ' > sT RDtR�n 1 z sw i; IRD; 3 ST ST SW SW 0�`b` PL 1✓ I '<` f� tsw' Q ►L W > I / 8. `Z a • �' ¢ "' m IPL 148THI {�V}y PL pw ST SW t47TR" c` m s IAJTH = Pl SW S ; 1 149 HRD OR B1149T 8W ST I aKIM sw SW%L > I PL �►- I - - �lie! �°� �; NO; S d : at 152N 3 ; 5 1 N RD ST ; 3 _ PL 1-•L1 153iiD ,",54TH I ' I T �67 CL 3 3 1 1 1 I f exn a i1sw I V, sw imuSl1175TH PL SW zI Mau .• PENNY Lld 1 TH PL SVN I�!fii: 189 PL SW RH M < 91 P� 191ST ,r.S:xM. SW �aii c 1921D IT , ST SWI ... -,END ST�._.- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS s cw1 HST I T PL sw sw ST) d3 157TH ST 3 = IOAIK AD) PL SYv Sw I F- I 99 TH hPL SW I I Z rt 3 I _ r 3 KEELEF9 I- 1L 1 DPS4 CORN01 I S I 1 al L —• IT SW ST sw j TH 1 L I ----i -- -3 --- -air- 1Tr' fly sw I 1172ND I K L_ >?1 i 11TH I U L T a � IN ■ po g 17QTH T 1 4 LYNN SW,swl � Q ate l a 79T T sw . S ; 180TH 1 ent "prPL SW OF W MAQ ; 1 PL lW i Q S D PL {w 1 0A. TM PL INWST sw 181TH WTH PL T SW 1 p WTH 3 u�r11 K 1 H ST bw 1SSTH a 1°6 ' PL syv t[ > > FS PL A „ � �!� e � T � sw ' 18 T ST I♦ 190 PL S S 182N0 T D CH 1921/D ST I 3 L SW .192ND PL 1 VICINITY MAP 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS9 WASHINGTO14 Job No.I GaIN ftl� 89300 AUG 89 N.T.S. 1 ❑e 5 LE R 20 25 30 35 40 e \`o NO ♦g �� USCS BORING 1 Description Elevation: ±72' Depth Brown sandy GRAVEL, moist, medium dense i Brown medium SAND, moist, loose, (Fill) +SP . 24.4 1 4 3- Gray clayey SILT to silt, very moist, soft with medium-sized sand lenses 43.5 2 3 ML Becomes non -plastic Q Blue -gray clayey SILT to silty clay with fine sand11 lenses, very wet, soft to firm 31.5 3 7 , C 31.2 4 9 17 Blue. -gray clayey SILT moist, firm to medium stiff 34.2 5 19 ML 26.8 6 39 Very stiff to hard Grades into clayey SILT silty CLAY 31 22.6 7 30 CL 16.4 8 36 Fine sand lens GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST BORING LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ✓00 NO Dote: Logged By: Rate. 89300 7/31/89 MKD 3 90 esip 40 45 50 5 C 25 30 35 40 BORING 1 (coat.) Elevations ±71 � USCS Description Depth 33.0 28.7 9 30 ML/ �L 43 Gray tine , moist,dense Gray clayey SILT to silty clay ML/ Moist, hard C 28.0 10 54 j Lenses of fine SAND 49 Test boring terminated at 49 feet on 7/31/89. Groundwater observed at 11 feet at time of drilling. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST GORING LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No.+ Dote + Lopped ey+ P/ale+ 89300 7/31/89 MKD 3A alb 0 E 15 ,00 �J �e ec�\ 0 5 E V w TEST PIT 1 USCS Description Elevation ±52' Brown silty gravelly SAND, slightly moist to moist, loose to medium -dense, with bricks, wood (Fill) SM .4 Silty sandy FOREST DUFF with roots Blue -gray silty SAND with some gravel, loose to medium SM/ dense - interlayered with clayey silt, firm to medium M1.1 stiff, very wet to saturated Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. Moderate caving below 5 feet. TEST PIT 2 USCS Description Elevation _±46' ML/1 Brown to red -brown sandy SILT with gravel to silty medium- SM. sized sand with gravel, moist, medium dense (Fill) Brown, orange -stained silty medium-sized SAND, wet, loose SM .. to medium -dense II�•�� uray, orange -stained gravelly silty JAND with coarse sand SM ' lenses and occasional cobbles, wet, loose to medium dense —Cray silty medium-sized SAND, very wet to saturated, 'll] loose to medium -dense Q SM Lens of medium-sized gravel Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 9 feet during excavation. Heavy caving below 6 feet. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS A_� , TEST PIT LOGS 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ✓ob No.: Dols L000es ey, P/oM 9300 1 7/31/891 MKD4 :1 i 9�0 TEST PIT 3 eQ� o`g � E/evoJion� ±44 0 G uscs Description 0 j'jl' Brown silty gravelly fine -sized SAND with silt lenses, •SM slightly moist, medium -dense, with bricks, wood (Fill) :,' Red -brown medium-sized SAND, moist, loose to medium- Sp.dense 5 Gray, orange -stained gravelly silty SAND with silt ISM" lenses, moist, loose to medium dense Wood and roots to 5 feet ML Gray to blue -gray SILT, moist, firm to medium-stitt 10 Test pit terminated at 9 feet.below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. R 20 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS i TEST PIT LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON lob No.: OO/tr Lopped Sy: Pole: 89300 7 31 8 r Slope bockfill away from foundation. -- , BACKFIL L See text for requirements. WASHED ROCK 6 "min. o NONWOVEN GEOTEXT/LE FILTER FABRIC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS A TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to. footing drain. SLAB T VAPOR BARRIER � 4 min. FREE - DRAINING SAND/GRAVEL 4" PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert at least as low as fooling and/or crawl space. Slope to drain. Place weepholes downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No.: Oo1e SCo/e P/oIi 89300 JULY 1989 N.T.S. 7 It _ •_ 1111�flIIII�II�I�IiQIII�IIII�I�II�Qllll�llllllll 4210M711006�413 g33 00 PGS • ItY CLERK SNOHOMISH COUNTl, ARSHINGiON CITY OF EDMONDS 121 517i AVENUE NO. EDMONDS ;WA 98020 STATEMENT ON GUEST HOUSES J..r&6Qrty Ad4'�e s 160 &D0 % 5AC'E w6s Legal:AesCriptiQn $EC 5,—rwhi ai, Je4 twm (Jo• 005131 oa9vr lac) See attached sheet REF F FIL I have read the,requi.rentents for guest houses contained in Chapters 16.20:010(D)(2)';and•21,,35.030,of the Edmonds Community Development Code and understand that:•i guest house with a kitchen is prohibited in single family zone;;districts,:and••that a guest house not including a kitchen is.permitt4d oily oq lot&t of.:20,000 square feet or greater and then only after a eoW tiQAJ.•Gse..permit has been approved by the City of Edmonds Hearing EX4 Ld` l : I also understand that ApprRVal of a Cgfid'ttional Use Permit is subject to a public hearing, and%aiither this•�statement nor.the issuance of a permit shall act to limit. -the discAtiop. of :the City. in the review of any application for a Conditiona•1' Usa••Pegmit. Property Owner Name Date ,.._....... STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF. S110110H13H) ...... _.... I: certify that I know or have satisfactory evi4enc,.. at;•' AV,- IC/ hL,-tosT signed this'fpst.rdmerd acril acknowledge it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act fga�'kle 4ses and , ses,mentioned in this instrument. od!, o Dated 9/ 7 190 �; /� •`'��74 Signature o Notary Public 'A' f'Stamp) r' �Sv PA Title � fi My appointment 'k;,c 1tf Expires —i— 9-9 - THIS DOCUMENT NUST_BE RECORDED. WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITQR' rr: LEGAL-DESCRIPTtON 124U L K. t--LUOTr Lot ll, :.41ock '49 " of --the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5..'' Of.,, Plat;-j"I".._page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington . :: '' • ' TOGETHER w3,t4--- racAed Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. AND . TOGETHER H• ,ViT",that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West (Seaside AvenUe)- 'ancl vacated North. Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting thie..Ilne-'l described as..follows: COMENCING at the 'Northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in. the Plat of Meadowds] e'•'B'gach� .,'•'•'ec6rded in Volume 5 of Plats, page' 38, Records of Snohomish•=roanty, Washington; thence N88'09143"W along the North line of sa•rd ].otr-;&tad the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177:51'',=feet L'q the Westerly margin of vacated Seaside Avenue at a Point. `on, the •arc of a curve from which the center lies N78.23.'28"W..::=(description N17.23'28"W) . 5258.8 feet distant; thence Southerly ajdo g•'saidcurve and margin to the right through a central angle o''1!1',32" an arc distance of 140.02 feet to the POINT QF BEGINNING, -of .:said liner', thence S88'0914311E 54.48 feet; thence V62'0110011E 14'5;01 feet..to the terminus of said line. at a point on the centerline of said N.arth Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured .:-At1-right angles 'from the centerline of 75th Place Wiest;''` tJience Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadowdale•"'Road-' to the right of, way of, 75th Place West. is j r� P ...,CITY CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS TZi 571; •AVENUE NO. EDMONDS •WA 98020 Or 1111NIDIIII�f II�I�B���IIIIVI�RIIIQIIII�II�II� _-_-� D21�100 4 1 ppM gg3333 00 PGS SNOHOMISH C4. I btASHINGTON STATEMENT ON GUEST HOUSES protierty Ad&e3s 161000 751-11 04e6 WIZ' L•dgal.•OesCriptign AEG 5,-I_VJM X?, R4 CWM PAkO-EL_ No. 005131 oa9vl 1o0 ee attached sheet I have read the.requi.rerkent; for guest houses contained in Chapters 16.20.01O(D)(2):.anO Z1.,35.030.of the Edmonds Community Development Code and understand 6fit:•a guest;hquse with a kitchen is prohibited in single family zone distr hs,:and..that a guest house not including a kitchen is permitted 'only on:'loti of.:20,000 square feet or greater and then only after a coAditipnal,••6se.vermit has been approved by the City of Edmonds Hearing EXemi•ner... I also understand that Approval of a C-"dhtional Use Permit is subject to a public hearing, and",hither thi.s•'statsment nor the issuance of a permit shall act to limit the disrretiop.oe%the City in the review of any application for a Conditiona•1`Use-Permit-. 26, Property Owner Name �`�QS�[�t Date STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) COUNTY.OF SNGHAM161 g I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidenc.>fiat: U� A41 L LL/07 T signed this xnstPumerit ead acknowledge it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act fpa�tkie gses.and .d�sesImentioned in this instrument. Dated k''7 190 '. Signature o f Notary Public f-Stamp) Title :•� j My appointment tit Expires THIS DOCUMENT MUST 6E RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITQR LEGAL--DESCR1PTlON 'p,4U L K. r..i.10TT , M51Pe Lot 11,,=9lock `29;'` of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5.. ` of .•'Plate'= .page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. TOGETHER Avenue adjoining thereto. AND TOGETHER ,-"`that-"`that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West (Seaside Avenue).--ani vacated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting fghe.-1Jne•'described as .follows: COVAENCING at the: -*Northeast 'corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the Plat of Meadowdale'-8•@ach.,- •recorded in volume 5 of Plats, page' 38, Records of Snohom�sh=Cou y, Washington; thence N88.09143"W along the North line of said 1ot;t�d the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177:51•" 6q the Westerly margin of vacated Seaside Avenue at •a' pain. '-on the •arc of a curve from which the center lies N78'23'28'w...:.(description N77'23828"W) 5258.8 feet distant; thence Southerly a long- sa]d•curve and margin to the right through a central angle o'2*1',32" an arc distance of 140.02 feet to the POINT QF BEGINNING. of .: said l inp-x** thence S88.009' 43 "E 54.48 feet; thence' 145:01 feet -.to the terminus of said Tine at a point on the centerline of said North. Meadowdale Road Eying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured :fit 'right angles from the centerline of 75th Place Wiest;-*` thence Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadowdale--Road-' to the right of, way of, 75th Place West. .. .. IIIINIRINII�IIIIIIRNIIRIRINIIIIIIIIIIRIIRINIIIV111 III �• 021071200604 lgpm gg3333 00 RGS . CITY CLERK SNOHOM(SH COUNTY, QASHINGTON CITY OF EDMONDS iZ3 6T4 AVENUE NO. ' EDMONDS'•We 98020 STATEMENT ON GUEST HOUSES pro�Qrty Ad'd'ref5 _ J6JLXD0 751-11 PtAe Wt6T L2ga1: -des driptign $EC 5,�4JN x7, fe4 EWM PAkdZi- NO. oo5t31oz9vI No See attached sheet . IN I have read the.requi.riRentrt for guest houses contained in Chapters 16.20.010(D)(2)-;anO'2l.,35.030.of the Edmonds Community Development Code and understand that.,a guest; house with a kitchen is prohibited in single family zone distrifts,.and..•th6t a guest house not including a kitchen is permitted bn.4 on. -Iota of.:20,000 square feet or greater and then only after a coAditional,••Use•-ermit has been approved by the City of Edmonds Hearing Exemi•rler... • I also understand that Opr6.al of a Co&tional Use Permit is subject to a public hearing, and".iiiither thi.s•"stafbment nor the issuance of a permit shall act to limit the diso.retiop.of%the City in the review of any application for a Conditional" Us4-0eirmit. Property Owner Name Date qo STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KSNOHOKSH) g I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence.. .•'` L—x_i-10 r signed this ihst.rdmeri� and acknowledge it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act fpr'tMe uses and Mies,mentioned in this instrument. Dated k'7 90 Signature o A Notary Public 0,Stamp) Title My• appo ntmen Fri Expires -i- 9s 11114111."• THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITPK LEGAL"DESCRIPTION 'p4 _ M.IELUCrr M5kM Lot 11, , •$lock'%229',-` of "-the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in volume 5.. '' of ,,'Plats•;' page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. .' TOGETHER w3,th.•-iracdtec Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. AND TOGET1fE ,--WITH-''•,that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West (Seaside Aven11el-'ant vaa,_ated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting the.-line'desc_ribed as .follows: COMENCING at the:`Nortli4ast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the Plat of Meadowda.le'•8'@a6h•,-••*'icec6rded in Volume 5 of Plats, page' 38, Recc'rds of Snohomtbsh--'-ro!inty, Washington; thence N88'09143"W along the North line of said ]Gtr.;►1�d the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177:51••'-fee .Lq the Westerly margin of vacated Seaside Avenue at a' pciint -on the ,arc of a curve from which the center lies N78.23'28"W.....••(descri�tion N77'23128"W) 5258.8 feet distant; thence Southerly aJcfn`g•'said" curve and margin to the right through a central angle o.f-':an arc distance of 140.02 feet to the POINT QF BEGINNING. of. --said line.,". thence S88.09' 43 "E 54.48 feet; thence' N62'0110011E 14.5.'01 feet..ti tthe terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said UQrth Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured :--At;'right angles -from the centerline of 75th Place Weest;.,' thence Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadov)daie•••'Road•'• to the right of, way of, 75th Place West. GEOTECH • CONSULTANTS 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 STREE7TFILF August 30. 1989 g JN 89300 Seawood Homes Inc. 7500 - 212th SW, Suite 210 Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. Lee Atkinson Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study AUG 3 Single -Family Residence 75XX Block, Meadowdale Road PERMIT COUNTER Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the single-family residence to be constructed on the lot northwest of the intersection of 75th Place West and Meadowdale Road in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our work'was to explore site conditions and provide earthwork and foundation design criteria. The subsurface conditions encountered by our explorations consisted of 1.5 to 4.5 feet of loose fill soils overlying wet, loose to medium -dense sands with variable silt content. Below the sands, a blue -gray, firm to medium -stiff silt was encountered. Although the site is on an ancient landslide, we believe that it is now relatively stable. To reduce differential foundation settlement to an acceptible level, we recommend the home be supported on a rigid grid foundation. Footing drains, free -draining backfill behind retaining walls, and other subsurface drainage control methods, as detailed in this report and as determined in the field during excavation will be required. The attached report presents our study and recommendations. If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,.INC. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer RECEIVED JUN 14 '` 0 Robert E. Young & Assoc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 75XX BLOCK, MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This. report represents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed single family residence in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located northwest of the intersection of 75th Place West and Meadowdale Road. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Based on preliminary information furnished to us, we anticipate. that the residence will consist of an "L" shaped, single -story structure with a daylight basement. We anticipate the house foundations will be placed at an elevation near the existing grades. Development of the property is in the planning stage and, therefore, only conceptual plans were available to us. The site plan given to us included the plot boundaries, located the existing structure, and provided topographic information. SITE CONDITIONS The. irregularly-shaped.property is located downslope (west) of 75th. Place West, between the roadway and the Burlington Northern Railroad. A paved access trail runs along the southern property boundary. North and south of the site is undeveloped. There is currently an older unoccupied home with an unattached shed sitting on the lot. Portions of the property have been previously. graded. There are some larger trees on the lot, along. with blackberry brush and other shrubs. Drainage is fair to good to the west. SUBSURFACE The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating three test pits and drilling one boring at the approximate locations shown ._.. on the site Plan, Plate 2.. The field exploration program was determined based cipon the proposed construction, GLOTECI# CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 2 site ..topography, the required design_ criteria, subsurface conditions revealed during excavation and drilling., and time and budget constraints. The boring was drilled on July 31, 1989, using a truck -mounted hollow -stem auger drill owned and operated by Pearson Drilling. Samples were taken at five (5) foot intervals using a standard penetration sampler. This two-inch outside diameter split spoon sampler is driven into the soil with a one hundred forty (140) pound hammer falling thirty (30) inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given ._distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. The test pits were also excavated on July 31, 1989 with a rubber -tired backhoe owned and operated by Clifton's Backhoe Service. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits and test boring, and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket. The.Test Boring Log is attached to this report.as Plate 3, and the Test Pit Logs are attached as Plates 4 and 5. The.. boring was. drilled on the east side of- the property adjacent..to 75th Place West... Below 3.5 feet of sandy fill, the..borinq encountered a soft silt to eleven feet. From eleven to seventeen feet, this silt graded into. a clayey silt/silty clay and became slightly more firm.- There were fine sand lenses in this.layer,. and also below, twenty-seven feet. .From seventeen to twenty-eight feet the subsurface became a.moist clayey silt. Below twenty-eight feet.this silt became...very stiff to hard. The boring was terminated at forty-nine feet below existing grades. The three test pits were excavated on the property near the location of the planned home. Generally, the subsurface at the proposed building site consists of fill soils, underlain by.loose..to..medium-dense sands, which are underlain by firm to medium -stiff clayey silt/silty clay with sand lenses. The final.logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests.. The stratification lines on the logs represent the.approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may. be gradual. The relative dent' -ties moisture descriptions indicated on the test pits and .boring,logs are interpretative descriptions based on the conditions observed during the,excavation. The logs should be reviewed for specific subsurface information at the locations tested. GFOTFCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 3 GROUNDWATER Groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of nine to eleven feet below existing grades. The test boring and pits were left open only for a short time period, therefore, the seepage levels. on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not be the location of the static groundwater level., evel. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We anticipate that groundwater could be found between the, near surface coarse -grained loose to medium -dense soils and the underlying fine-grained denser soils. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The property is located in the middle of a large slump block which encompasses the entire neighborhood. The slump block probably slid within the last.10,000 years, during the retreat of the last glacial age. There are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. However, the risk to developing and residing on this piece of property is no more.than the risks which the .neighbors assume by living in this area. We believe the. -project is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The home should utilize a rigid grid foundation as the surficial soils are loose and variable. We expect that conventional shallow footings, if utilized on this site, will subject the structure to greater than typically acceptable differential settlements. We recommend that the structure be supported on a rigid mat foundation to decrease this risk. The alternative is to place the structure on auger -cast concrete piers. We have not discussed pier foundations in this report, but are available to discuss this alternative should you wish to consider it. Drainage of surface and subsurface. water is the other major concern on this project. Due to the relatively impermeable nature of. the underlying silts, .,we expect groundwater levels to rise significantly in the over sands during the wetter winter months. Geotech Consultants Inc. should be given the opportunity to review . the final plans to verify that ..site specific foundation, drainage, and earthwork requirements are met. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30., 1989 Page 4 FOUNDATIONS The proposed structure may be supported, upported on a rigid mat foundation. The mat can consist of a�reinforced,_ two-way_beam -and slab set on a minimum of one-foot)"of.structural fill -built up from native soil.` A modu�Ius-of subgrade reaction of nine ( 9 : k. 'pounds' per ` cubic inch should be used in design. Over-..the.,mat wi1.1._be:- requi•r-ed. F~ill placed under the mat should _extend outwards._from_,the_edg.e at least a �stance::equal`'to'the depth of fill .underneath _ Tthe 'maf': „ �.The�perimeter of the mat should be founded a.minimum of twelve (.12) inches below the lowest adjacent outside finish grade. The mat should be designed in such a manner that ten te-et o-f--the..-mat., in__any_..direction. _could.. cantilever z-- For. the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total settlement of the mat founded as recommended will be about three-quarters of an inch, with negligible differential settlements.. Much of the settlement due to dead loads from the building structure should occur during construction. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure on.the-foundations. For the latter, the foundations must either be poured "neat" against the existing- soil or. the wall backfill must..be..'. compacted .,, structural ,,fi11. 'A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used. between the structural foundation concrete and the supporting--subgrade. The passive resistance of undisturbed native soils and well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the, pressure of a fluid having a density of three hundred ( 300 ):-pounds.. per cubic - foot. ( pcf) . ta_ mow' _9 ra 4• • �� • Retaining. and foundation walls should be designed to. resist lateral earth.pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommendations are for walls less than...twelvefeet high which restrain level backfill. If higher .walls are desired,- or if the backfill is .sloping uphill, ..then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope- of --the backfill in order to provide the. appropriate design earth.pressures. Walls, restraining level backfill, that are designed to yield an amount equal.to at.least 0.002.times the wall height can be designed to: :resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit. weight -of forty .(40) pounds per cubic :foot (pcf). - If walls are to be restrained at the top from.. free. movement, a uniform force.of one hundred (100) GF.O MM CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood-Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 5 .pounds per square foot (psf) should be added to the equivalent fluid pressure force.. For calculating -the base resistance to sliding,:. -we recommend using a passive pressure equivalent to that exerted .by.a fluid._having a density of three hundred (300) pcf:and-a coefficient of friction.of 0.35. These values assume... that -no hydrostatic pressures adt.behind the -wall and that no..:surcharge slopes.or loads will be placed ..above -.the walls::,--:If-these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Retaining and foundation walls should be backfilled with compacted free -draining granular soils containing no organics. The. ..wall backfill should contain no more than-5.percent silt or clay:and no particles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing.the No.' 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Alternatively, a geotextile drainage product such as Miradrain or Enkadrain may be used. The purpose of the backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. Where the backfill is to support walks or other slabs, we recommend that the. backfill consist of clean sand and gravel as this soil would be easier to compact in the excavation prism than siltier soils. Also, these soils will provide drainage behind the. wall. The top foot to eighteen inches of the backfill should consist of.a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. SITE D ATtvnrF We.recommend the use of footing drains at the base of the mat - and earth retaining walls. Roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system.- The footing drains should be surrounded by at least six inches of one -inch -minus washed rock. - The rock should be wrapped with non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert shouldbe at.least as low as the bottom of the mat or crawl -space and it should -be sloped for drainage. A typical footing drain detail is attached to this report as Plate,.7. The excavation -and -site -should be graded so that surface water is :directed_ off -the site.and away from the tops of slopes.. Water should...not be :allowed to stand in any. area where buildings, slabs; or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 6 compacting the surface soils to reduce the infiltration of rain into the soils. The slopes should be covered with plastic. Final site grading.in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. Groundwater was observed during our field work at depths of nine to eleven feet. However, seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and if encountered, the water should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe or French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. In no case should excavation slopes be steeper or greater than the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of four feet in unsaturated soils may be attempted vertical. For slopes having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1.25:1 (horizontal: vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. All permanent cut slopes into no steeper than 2.5:1 (H:V). exceed. 2:1 (H:V). Water uncontrolled over the top of exposed slopes should be seed vegetation to reduce erosio surficial layer of soil. native soils should be inclined Granular fill slopes should not should not be allowed to flow any slope. Also, all permanently ed with an appropriate species of n and improve stability of the We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, existing fills, and any other deleterious material: Stripped materials should be removed from the site or, if desired, stockpiled for later use in landscaping. The stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural.___ fill is_, defined_..__ as_..__.any_,:__fill placed under buildings, pavements, walkways, or other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads. Geotech GEOT,CH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 7 Consultants, Inc. should observe site conditions prior to fill placement. The surficial site soils are moisture -sensitive and can become very soft when wet and disturbed. We recommend that, if possible, the site preparation and earthwork be performed in the normally dry season of the year when earthwork would generally be less expensive and require less effort. Structural fill under floor slabs and foundations should be pl'aced-in horizontal lifts and compacted to a density equal to or greater than 95._.percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the Optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks and behind retaining walls should also be placed in. horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material. type, compaction equipment and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed eight (8) inches in loose thickness. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 sieve. The percentage of particles passing the 200 sieve should be measured on that portion of the soil passing the three-quarter inch sieve. On - site soils are not suitable for structural fill. LIMITATIONS - The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in the report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soils encountered in the test boring and test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions of the site. If, during construction, subsurface conditions are found which are significantly different from those observed in the boring and test pits, or assumed to exist in the excavations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and GEOTF,CH CONSULTANTS, INC. Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 8 cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in borings or test pits. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This report has been prepared for specific application to this project and for the exclusive use of Seawood Homes, Inc. and their representatives. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied.' The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. It is -recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and project specifications. It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork . and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommen- dations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 .0 Seawood Homes Inc. JN 89300 August 30, 1989 Page 9 contractor. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during placement of structural fill to observe the process and to conduct density tests in the fill. The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Plan Plate 3 Boring Log Plates 4 - 5 Test Pit Logs Plate 6 Grain Size Analysis Plate 7 Footing Drain Detail �*ft•T"•!N Respectfully submitted, ;� F`�•• GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. '�,� • TE00.0 Senior Engineer 10MAI 10' /amAe"s R. inley, Jr. P.E. Principal Attachments MKD/JRF:cvb GEOTBCH CONSULTANTS, INC. �1 1 SW j < ioS v' I 3 "01 1 ST sw Lt 1!t .4 I �I PUGET MA 8� C f.Qu-N— 1Sw PL r�fH srsw NOR EAC > N � D FISHERI�aD — 11CTM — �44> ; njr i aw s N 161 ST c - �� � � — ..... fax -r :. 16ZN0 ST Sw 'L f• v'"'�"' i I 3 RD ST > . f is ';:•' ;;::1 , 31 > I 3 — OL ;t RS"W C , 1 I N ,� PL W 'L 6W ao 14MIPL I/iTN rz SWS ; I I BE9H sw RD > I IST,Vu: S r';^,.-c•..-1 < 159RD w Si — S/tH 1 1� L'�H ST56TH< T A00 TH 1� 1 SITE Sa WWARF— `9 PL SW I jW ; v°INDw 7 I f IPL SW ( I oISw i I mumILE sw �•s`. __ _ 1 68TH ST _• �. \ A Ii _ MfA00 LE TM s �rM � � I -�•�!� i � � i _ PL FL aw ! 313 1 K ".•y'':::::' s >� < In � — cvowry —1 3 per a I i .-•C tns�sW) 1 ST I 1 /62ND � 82 < i � S\ 183 0 PL o� zl ST SoT �V i E is* \ 4 �LYWA/DAi� IEB Wpow PL 8W / PL SW '► `�� '� �'."��`;'•> • 3 I per H t 1 ! so < 91 PLI 191ST ►wwfh:;le sw (� Q 19210 IT 'ST SW SW -9 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS oil c v 1 Th. R W W ti ST ( vL sw > •• w STI 157 10 R01 M ►► sw Sw I I ' H PL SW I c I 99 S' 3 La KEELEW 1S; QPLsvi SC CORN�� t IISW I Q I 1. i g `►'� EQ I SWmm�m OWN uml ST sw < � 1 j 3 1 sw 1172ND sw I / I ,I ° a 1N ■ po mnwI SW— --L` —►-- —> I — --4-- 1Pd Q� L .ELIPTH; 19DTH 1 atn PL SW uo Hs a w MAQ ; PL qw < < 3 1 S t PL qw o iw QISWMM T TH PL ism A SW I BSTH ST bw Z I H - � a 1 - - - - - r - - 4 - fsPS lb " tgffw T I >` T ST N PL1cN CH ION ST 1 1 L SW . • Imo PL VICINITY MAP 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDM0ND3, WASHINGTON .b0 Ab. Octet 17711 89300AUG 89 N.T.8. 1 \ L(L W wo a EA 0 dON 71 \ N �� H1 NON \ • NO-1 9 /V/7`yn6 �°, z 0 0 F F < U0 0 0 J E. 0 LL co < 4 a s 01 O f a= 00 cc C7 2 _j Z J O N x a d 33 lu 0 H W = x� a x� O W f'o BORING 1 dp E/evolion: t72 0 Uscs Description DepM Brown san AVEL, moist, medium dense i Brown medium SAND, moist, loose, (Fill) :SP: 24.4 1 4 F. Gray clayey SILT to silt, very moist, soft with 3' medium-sized sand lenses 43.5 2 3 ML Becomes non -plastic 10 Q • Blue -gray clayey SILT to silty clay with ine san 11 31.5 3 7 lenses, very wet, soft to firm 15 M 31.2 4 9 20 34.2 5 1 19 25 26.E 1 6 1 39 30 22.6 7 30 3S 16.4 '81 36 1. 40 lue.-gray clayey SILT moist, firm to medium stiff 17 Very stiff to hard Grades into clayey SILT silty Fine sand lens GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST BORING LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 31 Job NO" ovie. Lopped Br: Pole. 89300 1 7/31/89 1 MKD 1 3 771 40 40 Go �� 0` uses 45 50 5 .0 25 30 35 40 L BORING 1 (cont.) Elevation: ±71' DOM 28.70 9 30 ML/ �L -bANV,-Moist, ray tine dense 434 Gray clayey SILT to silty clay ML/ Moist, hard C 28.0 10 54 Lenses of fine SAND _ 49 Test boring terminated at 49 feet on 7/31/89. Groundwater observed at 11 feet at time of drilling. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST BORING LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Owe: Lopped By, P/o/e: 89300 - 7/31/89 MKD I 3A 5 E 15 TEST PIT USCS Description 7 7 7 ! ! 1 Elevation: t52' L/L VW1I JI.LLy gravelly bRvij, sllgntly moist to moist, loose to medium -dense, with bricks, wood (Fill) Silty sandy FOREST DUFF with roots Blue -gray silty SAND with some gravel, loose to medium dense - interlayered with clayey silt, firm to medium stiff, very wet to saturated Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. Moderate caving below 5 feet.- Is `1° e� TEST PIT 2 `Ic 0 O6Q .��� USCS Description Elevation :t46' 0 5 E 15 -- v Wv Xl oatiuy J1L1 WtL11 8Ldvel LO S11Ly meaium- sized sand with gravel, moist, medium dense (Fill) Brown, orange -stained silty medium-sized SAND, wet, loose to medium -dense Gray, orange -stained gravelly silty SAND with coarse sand lenses and occasional cobbles, wet, loose to medium dense bray silty medium-sized SAN Q loose to medium -dense "],1 11 SM Lens of medium-sized gravel I ---j ­ —, Test pit terminated at 11 feet below existing grade. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 9 feet during excavation. Heavy caving below 6 feet. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST PIT LOGS 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ✓o0 No.I Dote + Lopped BY: Nom 9300 7/31/89 471 �•� ��°�\ �r g• m USCS 0 TEST PIT 3 Description Elevation: ±44' silty gravelly fine -sized SAND with sit enses, 1S1*1]1Brown M slightly moist, medium -dense, with bricks, wood (Fill) :gp�,, Red -brown medium-sized SAND, moist, loose to me ium- dense 5 T Gray, orange -stained gravelly silty SAND with silt SM lenses, moist, loose to medium dense Wood and roots to 5 feet JALIJ Gray to blue -gray SILT, moist, firm to me ium-sti 10 Test pit terminated at 9 feet below existing grade.. No groundwater -seepage encountered during excavation. 15 20 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS ....� TEST PIT LOG 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ✓06 NO. Doter Logged By, /loll 89300 7 31 1111!::iill l!!::i i!:ii Ull::i NIMPillllllll on iGmI:o dVil■ HUM 111111111111111 111111111111111 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 111111111111111 IIIIIIIIII11111 �I -S . t S/Ape bockfill away from foundation. --, BACKF/L L See text for 0equirementv WASHED ROCKsNONWOVEN GEO FILTER FABRIC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS A.�.. TIGHrL /NE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to tooling drain. I VAPOR BARRIER 1 SLAB 4 to FREE - DRAINING SAND/GRAVEL 4" PERFORATED HARD PVC P/PE Invert at least as low as fooling- and/or craw/ space. Slope to drain. Place weepAoles downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 75XX MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON .lob No.+ 89300 Dole. JULY 1989 IScvr: N.T.S. Pole 7 0 RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 Sth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 P-1.0py ('ril i"JAL ON FILE IN THE C. 11 .` AUDITOR'S OFFICE nohomish oao�2AE�oAOEo County COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: 0)- 1y 22 to L Grantor(s): (1) V IAW M 1 r �(2) r � M r o5C+ Udit,onal on pg. Grantee(s): Chy of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec Twn_jEng OR Lot . Z— Block Plat rJ Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1)Sf gal ClI MI 0=0 (2) -----Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: DATE:VPAGE I OF b Under the review procedures established pursuant to 'the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, J stipulate and promise as follows: • L E ED FOR RECO�ZD G: k— DATE: w �� OF (p 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of no �� � � (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: (0SO)D- coo Farce,[ CiO (.e-)+ Anco, re -an .4-i o n , k 10 -,-;7q--on 2. Notification and. Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having :a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. _ The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number (insert number) on file with the. City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE: W PAGE- OF the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth. stabilization matters in order to address future. or anticipated changes in soil. or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless The undersigned. OWNERS . hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and -out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss,_ claim, liability or - damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out. of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site; or occurring or APPROVED FOR RECO ING: BY: DATE: r Uu PAGE , OF arising out of any false, misleading, or -inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has •'he-e1Fe) specifically "required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person, or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their.interest may appear. This provision shall not be 'interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above. required. APPROVED FOR RECO ING: BY: DATE: OD PAGE OF DONE this ^ day of ta t . ,1991. OWN] By: By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF S U i ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CC C,tCk h IV► I oqy(� VV i G signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this ^day of u-VIQ ; -1.99 q. CONSTANCE M. CURTIS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 9, 2003 L:ITEMP\BUILDINGIMEADOW\COVENANT NOTARY PUBLIC My. commission expires: 0 APPROVED FOR RECORDING: PAGE I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary. act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. . DATED this day of , 199_ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADO W\COVENANT RECF1VFD APR 2 0 1998 PLANrvuvu DEPT. (" I-'Y CLERK (;i*TY OF EDMONDS 9802040113 i �S 5TH AVENUE NO. EWONDS, WA 98020 02/04/98 10:26 p.0001 Recorded Snohomish County STATEMENT ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Property Address: Edmonds, Washington Legal Description: Lco+ ( t. z aoci 59 _P(a i. Assessor's Parcel Number: S 5 i - QS9 - 6t) f — U OD(.o I have read the requirements for accessory dwelling units contained in Chapter 20.21 of the Edmonds Community Development Code and understand that an accessory dwelling unit, including a second kitchen, is prohibited for two years after occupancy by the current owner (unless a waiver is granted by the Community Services Department) and until after a conditional use permit has been approved by the City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner. I also understand that approval of a conditional use permit is subject to a public hearing, and neither this statement nor the issuance of a building permit shall act to limit the discretion of the City in the review of any application for a conditional use permit. Property Owner Signature. Date: (� (c�� 1� STATE OF WASHINGTON) ,t q COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) r I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that�� signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Notary's pressure seals must be smudged. Dated: Signature of Notary Public: Residing at:��nya`x My Appointment Expires: THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR. /GdOO 7Y;�Ci � CITY CLERK 41 CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS, WASEET -7 EXHIBIT At FILE UTILITY EASEMENT SFECEIVED APR 2 1 1992 ENGINEERING ST F C-0 IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Paul & Linda Elliott , hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, two 10.00 foot permanent easements, 5.00 feet on each side of each utility centerline as constructed for the installation, operation and maintenance of a sanitary sewer and storm sewer line over, across, and below the following described property; and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth `ate and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said utility, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. `-4 The easement hereby granted is located in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: Lot 11, Block 29, of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. TOGETHER with vacated Seaside Ave. adjoining thereto, AND TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 75th Ave. W. (Seaside Ave.) and vacated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting the line described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of ,Lot 11, Block 29, in the Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington; thence N 88*09143" W along the North line of said lot, and the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin of vacated Seaside Ave. at a point on the arc of a curve from which the center lies N 78*23128" W (description N 77*23128" W) 5,258.8 feet distant; thence Southerly along said curve and margin to the right through a central angle of 1*31'32" an arc distance of 140.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence S 88*09143" E 54.48 feet; thence N 62*01100" E 145.01 feet to the terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured at right angles from the centerline of 75th P1. W.; thence Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road to the right-of-way of 75th P1. W. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their,,, heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure (i=Am -0eL-pr A concrete driveway) over, upon, or within the permanent easement. rn DATED this ,?o ='� day of 19 9� NO EXCISE TAX REQUIRED =; JUL 10 1992 �STAT_E7=OF=_WASHINGTON) mm SIEVEIS, SPdhomiA County Iteawrtr ON � 2 ��0G > �y KIRKE SIEVERS �ll COUNTY Ol NOMtI) B On this day personally appeared before me )00,U Q C' //i0 f2 and ��Q f �,/�7�; to me known to be the individual (s) descriined in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act add deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF 19C/_ n (7,, °ELLI Tjf . M `..0U NOTARY PIJBLIC in and for the Stat of Washington, residing at Le7-4:1 - — S VOL. 2 5 9 5 put 1 4 • EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO • Item number: 'r STREET.- TILE' Originator: Robert J. Alberts For Action: x For Information: SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RELINQUISHMENT OF DISPUTED UTILITY EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW UTILITY EASEMENT AND QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR 10-FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM PAUL AND LINDA ELLIOTT AT 16000 - 75TH PL. W. AGENDA TIME: Consent AGENDA DATE: May 5, 1992 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Exhibit A Map 2. Exhibit B - Notice of Abandonment of Easement & Relinquishment of Disputed Rights 3... Exhibit C - Utility Easement . Clearances: Dept./Indiv./Initials ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVI S ENGINEERING PARKS & RECREATIO PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS FIRE PERSONNEL POLICE , COMMITTEE MAYOR - COMMENTS: EXPENDITURE- AMOUNT APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0 HISTORY AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: This new easement is to replace.the disputed utility --easement given to the City in 1979 and 1980 and exchange previous non vacated North Meadowdale right-of-way described.in Exhibit B-1 for a ten (10) foot right-of-way dedication on 75th P1. W. to Paul and Linda Elliott. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Abandon disputed easement and accept new utility easement and approve exchange of right-of-ways. COUNCIL ACTION: ELLIOTT/TXTAGNDA S�S�T z- � w • 0 O . I D � D Z O Q Z m ( N\ 00 NO om w0 Z Z 0 m \ 0 r- - z . �l 0) D O m r Do D \ m m o -ZI D D \ r z m to O m m m r- z z m m (n r Z m -n Z 33 O O � DO � C O r n �D �o -� O� ) �n v z r0 �m 0 R 1� no 9-4 ,c 75TH PL. W. R.O.W. DATE FILE NO# RES. NO# ORD; NO# EXHIBIT A 0 m bC G O 0 n m O O m o 0 U) Exhibit A - Page 1 NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT AND RELINQUISHMENT OF DISPUTED RIGHTS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds after due investigation has determined that the grantors of two utility and access easements. which purport to transfer certain easement rights to ,the City of Edmonds -did not have sufficient title or power to grant such easements, and WHEREAS, in order to clarify the title records of the true owners of the property purportedly encumbered by such easement; .NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forbearance from the suit of the current property owners, the provision of right of way pursuant to a separately executed quit claim deed and the mutual benefits to be derived, the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation hereby takes the following actions: 1. Abandonment of Easements and Relinquishment of Rights. Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds,, a municipal corporation hereby abandons and relinquishes any and all right, title, claim or interest purportedly created by either of the following documents: 1.1 Utility and Access Easements, dated July 17, 1979 and recorded under Snohomish County Auditors No. 7907230121; and 1.2 Utility and Access Easements, dated April 21, 1980 and recorded under Snohomish County Auditors No. 8005290186. Both of the above documents purport to create easements over the land described in the attached Exhibit B-1. WSS5493.1A/0006.150.098 -1- WSS&h 04n3M EXHIBIT B Exhibit B Page 2 2. Release of Rights to Current Owners. In consideration of their forbearance from suit,the City of Edmonds hereby conveys and quit claims,relinquishing all disputed rights in the tract described on the attached Exhibit A to Paul M. Elliott and Linda M. Elliott, a marital community and owners of the dominant estate, any old rights of any kind or nature in the real estate described on the attached Exhibit A, situated in Snohomish County, Washington, and purportedly granted to the City under the documents described in paragraph .1. This waiver and relinquishment, conveyance and quit claim is intended to convey any and all rights presently owned by the City to the grantees and their successors and assigns. DATED this day of , 1991. CITY OF EDMONDS: ATTEST: Rhonda J. March, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE I;'1� - W. Scott Snyd ATTORNEY By: WSS5493.1A/0006.150.098 -2- Laura M. Hall, Mayor Exhibit B - Page 3 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 1992, before me personally appeared Laura M. Hall, to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation, described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. WSS5493.1A/0006.150.098 -3- WSSAK o4/2 M NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires: Exhibit B - Page 4 EXHIBIT B-1 A strip of land 30 feet in width embracing that portion of Meadowdale Beach Road lying between Blocks 29 and 59 in the Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Block 29; thence N88.04514311W along the southerly line of said block and the northerly margin of said road 10.39 feet to intersect a line parallel with and 30 feet westerly of the centerline of 75th Place W. 'and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S1605911711W along said parallel line 22.62 feet; thence S62100110011W 42.40 feet to intersect a line parallel with and 60 feet westerly of said centerline of 75th Place W. , also being the easterly line - of that portion of Meadowdale Beach. Road as vacated by City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 2073; thence N1605911711E along said parallel line 33.55 feet to intersect the southerly line of said Block 29; thence N72 ° 20' 17"E- along said southerly line and the northerly margin of Meadowdale Beach Road 31.44 feet to an angle point thereon; thence S88045143"E along said southerly line and road margin 4.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. WSS5502.1E/0006.150.098 Exhibit B - Page 5 RECEIVED EXHIBIT C APR 2 1 0 UTILITY EASEMENT .ENGINEERING IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors herein, the undersigned, Paul & Linda Elliott , hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, two .10.00 foot permanent easements, 5.00 feet on each side of each utility centerline as constructed for the installation, operation and maintenance of a sanitary sewer and storm sewer line over,.across, and below the following described property; and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction and maintenance of said utility, together with the right of access to the easement at any time for the stated purposes. The -easement hereby granted is located in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more particularly described as follows: Lot 11, Block 29, of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. TOGETHER with vacated Seaside Ave. adjoining thereto, AND TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 75th Ave. W. (Seaside Ave.) and vacated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting the line described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington; thence N 88*09143" W along the North line of said lot, and the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin of vacated Seaside Ave. at a point on the arc of a curve from which the center lies N 78*23128" W (description N 77*23128" W) 5,258.8 feet distant; thence Southerly along said curve and margin to the right through a .central angle of 1*31132" an arc distance of 140.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence S 88*09143" E 54.48 feet; thence N 62*01100" E 145.01 feet to the terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured at right angles from.the centerline of 75th P1. W.; thence Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road to -the right-of-way of 75th P1. W. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original condition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall not construct any permanent structure. (i=m 0CL-Pr A concrete driveway) over, upon, or within the permanent easement. DATED this xo- day o9 STATE OF WASHINGTON) jam, 0 (o ) COUNTY OF %40MOMT") On this day personal y appeared before me 0. and ir, to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that13 signed the same as free and voluntary act add deeU-, for the uses and purposes t erein mentioned. UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF 19�oZ NOTARY PUBLIC in anC1 Tor the Stat of Washington, residing at eS S ELLIOTT/TXTFORMS Exhibit C - Page STREET FILE THESE MINUTES SUBJECT �� MAY 19 , 1992�1 "91�Rd9i�{l�#L, � t) • EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NAY 8 1992 May 5, 1992 G/Ni�6R//VG The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Laura Hall at the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main St., Edmonds. All present joined in the flag salute. PRESENT Laura Hall, Mayor Jeff Palmer, Council President Steve Dwyer, Councilmember Dave Earling, Councilmember Michael W. Hall, Councilmember William Kasper, Councilmember John Nordquist, Councilmember Tom Petruzzi, Councilmember Dianna Phillips, Student Representative STAFF Dan Prinz, Police Chief Brent Hunter, Personnel Manager Chuck Day, Accounting Manager Bob Alberts, City Engineer Noel Miller, P.W. Superintendent Arvilla Ohlde, Parks & Rec. Mgr. Rob Chave, Planning Manager Jeff Wilson, Planning Supervisor Tom King, Facilities Supervisor Scott Snyder, City Attorney Rhonda March, City Clerk Barb Mehlert, Recorder 'Mayor Hall said the City's new Aid Car was on display in front of the Library, should any member of the audience wish to view it. Mayor Hall said the Appellant listed in Item 6, is requesting a postponement of both hearings (Items 6 and 7), as he was not notified by the official hearing notice procedure. The Appellant and Applicant were present and agreed to a new hearing date of June 16, 1992. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, TO SCHEDULE ITEMS 6 AND 7 ON TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1992. MOTION CARRIED. At 7:05 p.m., the Mayor and City Council recessed to an Executive Session to discuss a legal and a property matter and reconvened at 7:40 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA In the interest of the citizens present for other hearings, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PALMER MOVED, SEC- ONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO PULL THE REQUESTED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS, BUT HOLD DISCUSSION ON THEM UNTIL THE END OF THE COUNCIL MEETING, SO THE SCHEDULED HEARINGS WOULD NOT BE DELAYED. MO- TION CARRIED. Items (B), (E), (F), (G), (K), (L), and (M) were pulled from the Consent Agenda. COUNCIL PRESI- DENT PALMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE APPROVED ITEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: (A) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVE CLAIMS WARRANTS FOR THE WEEK OF APRIL 27, 1992 (D) RESOLUTION #745 TO SET HEARING DATE OF JUNE 2, 1992, FOR VACATING A PORTION OF THE UNOPENED 184TH STREET S.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING WEST OF OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE AND LYING SOUTH OF 7704 �� � A OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE (APPLICANT: RUSSELL KIM/FILE NO. ST-92-38) AH) APPROVAL OF RELINQUISHMENT OF DISPUTED UTILITY EASEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW UTILITY EASE MENT AND QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR 10-FOOT STREET DEDICATION FROM PAUL AND LINDA ELLIOTT AT 16000 75TH PL. W. (I) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY REGARDING EMERGENCY VEHICLE OPERATION TRAINING. (J) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR 200TH/8OTH WALKWAY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mayor Hall opened up the audience portion of the meeting. As no member of the audience came forward, Mayor Hall closed the audience portion of the meeting. 0 Page No. 5 STREET FILE Order No. A38733 EXHIBIT B 1. Reservations contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded under Recording No. 180453, reserving to the grantor all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing, and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry. 2. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS GRANTED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: JULY 14, 1969 Recording No.: 2103617 Purpose: For reasonable recreational user, which recreational user shall be consonant with the use which the grantors of their successors -in -interest may at any time make of the property hereinbefore described. It is understood and agreed by all parties that this eaement is primarily intended for the use of the grantees and their successors -in -interest in having access to the water and doing what is commonly known as beach combing, and so forth, and that this easement shall not be used in any manner, now, or at any time in the future, which would interfere with grantors' occupancy of the real property which is made subject to this easement. Affects: Parcel B 3. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, AS RESERVED BY INSTRUMENT: Recorded: JUNE 19, 1979 Recording No.: 7906190310 In Favor Of: The City of Edmonds Purpose: Construction, installation, repair and maintenance of all public utilities and services Affects: The portion of vacated street descibed in Parcel A 4. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Between: Charles E. Stevens and Margie E. Stevens And: Roger McCorkle, et al Recorded: DECEMBER 16, 1986 Recording No.: 8612160450 Purpose: Covenant and Agreement Regarding Property Boundary 5. Right in the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not on:y for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; including (but not limited to) fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands, shorelands, or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as further defined by the decisional law of this State. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence.) END OF EXHIBIT B STREET FILE 4,� N w c C: C r, Cl IL z v CL �. e z �A C) s � r D Ti J Miscellaneous Right -of -Way Occupancy Permit No. PX90-16301 Job #, 89-3033 Group 4 THIS AGREEMENT, made this 2nd day of JANUARY, 1991, bet,Yeen BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a -Delaware corporation, hereinafter . called "Burlington" whose post office address -is 2000 First Interstwice Center, 999. Third Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104-1105, and PAUL M. ELLIOTT, whose post office address is: 102.2 N. W. 196th Seattle, WA 98177 hereinafter called "Permittee," WITNESSETH: Burlington, for and in consideration of the fee herein provided to be --paid to it by Permittee and of the covenants and promises hereinafter made to be ob- served and performed by Permittee, does hereby grant to Permittee license and permission to excavate -for, construct, maintain and operate an 8-inch PVC storm drain along the easterly right-of-way. This pipe is 38-feet in lenth and extends from the easterly Railroad R/W to the easterly Railroad drainage ditch line, to serve a residence located in Lot 11, Block 2.9, Sec. 5, T27N, R4E, WM, hereinafter referred to as the "facility," upon the right-of-way of Burlington, or underneath the surface thereof of Burlington's track, as the case may be, at or. near EDMONDS (Meadowdale Beach), in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, to be:located as follows, to -wit: at Line Segment 0050 - Survey Station 1239+29 - Milepost 21.51. Permittee in consideration of such license and permission hereby covenants and promises as follows: 1. Permittee will pay in advance to Burlington for this permit the sum of FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($450.00) for the entire time this permit remains in effect and Permittee will also pay or reimburse Burlington for all taxes and assessments that may be levied or assessed against said "facility". Burlington reserves the _right to change the fee on future Permits at any time without notice. This provision shall in no way affect Burlington's right to terminate this permit pursuant to Paragraph 10 hereof. Either party hereto may assign any receivables due them under this Agreement, provided, however, such assignments shall not relieve the assignor of any of its rights or obligations under this agreement. 2. Permittee, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, shall excavate for, construct, reconstruct, maintain and repair the facility, placing the same in accordance with the specifications provided in application dated 8/10/90, ..heretofore approved by the Burlington's Division Engineer. Permittee shall fill in the excavation, and restore the surface of the ground to its previous condition subject to the approval of the General Manager of the Division of Burlington upon. which the "facility" is located. Said General Manager shall have the right at any time when in his judgment it becomes necessary or advisable, to require any material used in the work to be replaced with like material or with material of a more permanent character; also to require additional work or chancre of location of said "facility" as a matter of safety,' or of appearance, or an ai::::c,unt of additional tracks being laid, change of grade thereof, construction it a building, or for any other reason whether or not connected with the operation, maintenance, or improvement of Burlington, all of, which shall be done at t7n,:, e-xpense of Permittee in the manner herein provided. dec179OdO4 �F'� t 3... Permittee shall give to the .said General Manager at least two (2) days'. advance notice of any work to be done by Permittee .in the excavation, construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location or removal of the "facility", and shall conduct such work in such manner as not to interfere with the maintenance and operation of Burlington. 4.' In the event that Burlington, at the request of Permitl.ee or any agent or contractor of Permittee, or for the protection of its property and opera ..-tions, does any work, furnishes any material or flagging service, or incurs any expense whatsoever on account of the excavation for, construction, any recon- struction, maintenance, repair, change of location, removal of the "facility" or otherwise, Permittee shall reimburse Burlinqton for the cost thereof within twenty (20) days after bills are rendered therefor. If the excavation for construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, or removal of the "facility", requires any or all of the following work: Removal and replacement of track, bridging, protection of track or other Burlington facilities by work or flagging, engineering and/or supervision, such work is to be performed by Burlington employees and the cost borne by Permittee. 5. (a) Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on Burlington's property. Permittee shall telephone Burlington at 1-800-533-2891 (a 24-hour number) to determine.if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on Burlington's premises to be used by Permittee. If it is, Permittee will telephone the telecommunications company(ies) involved, arrange for a cable locator, and make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable prior to beginning any work on Burlington's premises. In addition to the liability terms elsewhere in -this Agreement, Permittee shall indemnify and hold Burlington harmlessagainst and from all cost, liability, and expense whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and court costs and expenses) arising out of or in any way contributed to by any act. or omission of Permittee, its contractor, agents and/or employees, that causes or in any way or degree contributes to (1) any damage to or destruction of any telecommunications system by Permittee, and/or its contractor, agents and/or employees, on Burlington's property, (2) any .injury to or death of any person employed by or on behalf of any telecommunications company, and/or its contractor, agents and/or employees, on Burlington's property, and/or (3) any claim or cause of action for alleged loss of .profits or revenue by, or loss of service by a customer or user of, such .:telecommunications company(ies). 6. In the event any cathodic electrolysis or other electrical grounding system is installed in connection with the "facility" which, in the opinion of Burlington, in any way interferes with any train signals, telephone or telegraph lines, or other facilities of Burlington, Permittee upon being informed by Burlington of such interference shall forthwith discontinue operation of and remove said grounding system, or take such steps as may be necessary to avoid and eliminate all such interference. Permittee further agrees to indemnify and save harmless Burlington from and against any damages, claims, losses, suits or expenses' in any manner arising from or growing out of interference with the signals, telephone or telegraph lines of Burlington by the operation, use or existence of any.such grounding system. 7. Permittee shall and hereby releases and discharges Burli.ngton of and from any and all liability for damage to or destruction of the said "facility", and any other property of Permittee located on or near Railroad's premises; and shall and hereby assumes any and all liability for injury to or death of any and all persons whomsoever, including officers, employees and agents of the parties hereto, or loss of or damage to property to whomsoever belonging, including property owned by, leased to or in the care, custody and control of the parties hereto, in any manner arising from or during the construction, any reconstruc- tion, use, maintenance, repair or removal of said "facility", however such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aforesaid may occur or be caused; and shall and hereby does indemnify and save harmless Burlington of and from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, damages, recoveries, judgments, costs or expenses arising or growing out or in connection with any such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aft...,;aid. Permittee further agrees to appear and defend in the name of Burlingto ,cty suits or actions at law brought against it on account of any such personal Injuries, death or damage to property, and to pay and satisfy any final judgme:. that may be rendered against the Burlington in any such suit or action. 1.1!;: ►..IA.BILITY ASSUMED BY PERMITTEE SHALL NOT BE. AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF IT IS A 0C T, THAT THE LOSS, DAMAGE, DEATH, OR INJURY WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTEfaTO BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF BURLINGTON, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES, OR OTHERWISE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE dec1790dO4 LAW; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT PERMIT?EE SHAf,.':._ HAVE NO OBLIGATION 'TO ASSUME SUCH LIABILITY TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE NEGLIC,ICE OF BURLINGTON OR ITS EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS WHERE ASSUMPTION OF SUCH LIABILITY '40ULD VIOLATE WASHINGTON LAW (RCW' 4.24.115), OREGON, IDAHO, OR THE PROVINCE OF i" -TISH COLUMBIA LAWS. 8. Permittee shall not transfer or a:;�..'��� this permit without the written consent of Burlington. 9.. Nothing herein contained shall imply or import a covenant on the part of Burlington for quiet enjoyment. 10. 1 It is expressly understood and agreed that Burlington may at .any time_ cancel and terminate this license and permission by giving to Permittee thirty (30) days' notice in writing of its intention to cancel the same,=and"at ..the, expiration of such notice this license and permission shall. terminate. Upon receipt of such notice and before the expiration thereof, Permittee, under the supervision and direction of the said General Manager, or his.authorized repre- sentative, shall remove the "facility" from the right-of-way of Burlington and restore the right-of-way and premises of Burlington in a manner and to such condition. as shall be satisfactory to the said General Manager: ..If Permittee shall fail to remove the "facility" and restore the said right-of-way to such condition within said thirty (30) day period, Burlington at its option may remove the same and restore the said right-of-way to its previous condition, and Permittee shall pay TO Burlington the cost and expense thereof. 11. Upon any failure of Permittee to punctually and strictly' to_ob'serve. and perform the covenants and promises made herein by Permittee to be kept and performed, Burlington may terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days' notice -to Permittee, remove the "facility", and restore the right-of-way to its previous condition at the cost and expense of Permittee. 12. In the event of Permittee's removal of the "faci°T.ity".. ,from. Burlington's premises, Permittee agrees to terminate said Agreement by notifying. . Burlington's General Manager in writing. of Permittee's removal of,"facility'.' and termination of said Agreement within thirty (30) days from date :of ,removal.of said "facility" from Burlington's, premises.Any notices , given under; the provisions of this Agreement shall be good if deposited postpaid in a United' States post office addressed to Permittee at Permittee's post office address above stated or as otherwise directed by Permittee. 13. Any notice given under the provisions of this Agreement shall be good., if deposited with the United States Postal Service addressed to Permittee at Permittee's post .office address above stated or as otherwise directed bye Permittee. 14. The license and permission herein granted is subject to permits, leases and licenses, if any, heretofore granted by Burlington affecting the premises upon which said "facility" is located. 15. The license and permission herein granted is subject to permits, leases and licenses, if any, heretofore granted by Burlington affecting the . premises upon which said "facility" is located. Subject to the foregoing provisions, this Agreement and all of the covenants and promises thereof, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, their respective executors, administrators, successors and assigns. F dec1790dO4 ADDENDUM TO BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY PERMIT NO. PX90-16301 DATED January 2, 1990 The Permittee or his contractor(s) shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the Initial Construction Period and all future maintance or reconstruction periods, which require the use of heavy machinery or excavation of soil upon BURLINGTONS Right-of-way or within FI50) FEET of BURLINGTONS tracks a RAILROAD PROTECTIVE LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY., naming BURLINGTON asthe insured, covering all acts of the Permittee or his contractor(s) arising out -16301 facilities, with standard limits of of the installation of Permit No. PX90 TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000) foror eacTi�odily injury and property damage with an aggregate of SIX MILLION DOLLARS ($6,000,000). This insurance coverage may be provided by exercising one of the two following alternatives: (a). Permittee or his contractor(s) purchase a policy on the open market or (b) Permittee shall have the option to participate in the Burlington Blanket Railroad Protective Liability program by paying to Burlington in check, prior to the commencement of any work or access under this Permit, the amount of $250.00 referencing Permit No. PX90-16301. -Prior to commencement, of any work to be performed under this agreement, Permittee shall submit to Burlington the ORIGINAL INSURANCE POLICY AS DESCRIBED. IN (A).ABOVE, WITH the Permit No. PX90-16301 shown on the declarations page. It is understood that said insurance policy shall be so written that no insurance company shall have any recourse against Burlington, by way of subrogation or otherwise, for any loss covered by or paid or payable under said policies. Ed Baumueller Wayne McCann - TrucKing- -Contractor Subcontractor 8741 'Battlepoint Dr': N.E. ress Bainbrid a Island Wa 98110 ity, State, ip, one um er .842-3404 None Protect Engineers Name 12410 - N.E. 04th ress Kirkland Wa. 98033 624-9602 sty, State, Zip, Phone Number I . Project Engineers Name If more than one Subcontractor is involved, attach additional information to this Addendum, together with Insurance required. NEITHER PERMITTEE, CONTRACTOR, OR ANY SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BEGIN ANY WORK ON TNr,11RANCF HAS BEEN FURNIS D ND PPR V D BY BURLING N, ND THE ROADMASTER NOTIFIED 48 HOURS 1- DVANCE. Questions or clarifications of insurance requirements may be directed to: Ms. Judith Harris Risk Management Analyst BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY 777 Main Street Fort Worth, TX 76102. Phone: 817-878-2374 FAX: 817-878-2377 For number of 206-625-6224 dec1790dO5 i trains, etc., CONTACT Trainmaster J. W. Duffy, at Seattle, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Burlington and Permittee have executed this Agreement the day and ,year first above written. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY • ` Title: DIVISION ENGINEER Witnesses in the presence of: PAUL M. ELLIOTT A o� By: c I j —We Title: m BUILDIN& VISION TELEPHONE/VISIT RECORD` STREET FILE , DATE TIME PERSON CALLEDCOMPANY TELEPHONE # PROJECT 5prz (5t.uyr� RE: tAoz (oy µg cALl- &- l W Av-44 -ct w r- sq-sat.AM uiw t-l-, tt-A� A. Lx- wwu aNP. G����� Pc�ecss,o►� ,�� �,�,�,� s�-v4 �ur�o� Q?i9-vLLZce{ 1'ke- Us" Guc.vew TMT Pkss e3 T W'144t PR. p'ne-0. T If Tth o NR• k(ywJG tV WiP Vs a Aow./• tN ArMrro.a j�c.avr Cy,,�,p t ISS"EM , 10�9W WUu.4.o tFhUL TO py� OGatC,aCr� :y j�kt: C tat Ao&X, lro'G PL W FILE COMMENTS: t-W�• LQmAtq S VZW t(CS C4-#.Mu tA.ASN=r wLULA" z'o D iACwre- )d of OU' P46T Pau: wou%,0 Co*.13 x-YL z PV0l0-rA* OAl2. 4o0Ne, tr-� Its CLAej-T Pr -r TN*T uo'j Tn suippAm pleolodw , V�uT P7f*-Aze 'jltb pelf-u. rr (wuo Feu vSsuED to lupul0 R'4go�c CALL TAKEN BY: l-,A, VISIT DATE TIME LOCATION PROJECT SUBJECT FILE COMMENTS: CITY REPRESENTATIVE: WHOM/COMPANY CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA MAHEY MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Io c . 189� Planning • Building • Engineering _ April 9, 1999 Paul & Linda Elliot 16000 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Homeowner Insurance Coverage for Meadowdale Development As you may recall, development of your home was subject to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.05.050 which regulated construction and insurance coverage requirements for all designated Meadowdale Landslide Hazard Area development. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Edmonds City Council has enacted a change which effects your homeowners policy that was required by this ordinance. If you recall you were required to post a one million dollar homeowner policy in order for your home to be granted final occupancy. Please be advised, the City Council has repealed this requirement effective April 16, 1999. In lieu of this policy the City Council will be holding future public hearings to determine alternate coverage methods to ensure that the intent of ECDC 19.05.050 are still met. Please contact the City Clerk if you are interested in attending these meetings. You may wish to consult your insurance professional to determine the proper amount of insurance coverage necessary to meet your specific needs. Since the insurance requirement is repealed the City no longer requires to be informed of your coverage or be provided with a copy of your current policy. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 771-0220. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan i • • - ::` CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 r COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering Inc.18°I� June 13, 1997 , Paul & Linda Elliott 16000 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 `Re: Home Owners Insurance Policy BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR As you may recall, the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landslide Area Ordinance requires homeowners to post and maintain a policy of general public liability insurance. This insurance is required for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of final approval (occupancy was granted on 6/9/92). According to City records, -your certificate of insurance expired on 8/26/93. At your earliest convenience please inform your insurance company that a current copy be provided to the City. • As a reminder, the policy must be for general public' liability insurance naming the City as additional named insured against personal injury, death, property damage and/or .loss arising from, or out of, the City's involvement in the permitting process for the project in the amount of one million dollars. The policy shall also state that the City will be notified 30 days in advance of policy cancellation. Note, this requirement of insurance is transferable to any and all owners within the 10 year period. If you have recently sold your property, please notify the City in writing of the name of the new owners. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions regarding this insurance requirement. Thank you, l Lara Knaak Permit Coordinator r. cc: The American Insurance Company • Building Official 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan + STREET FILE � CITY OF EDMONDS 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT I 899q O Public Works • Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering 0 _ 1 March 18, 1992 Mailed 3/24/92 Paul Elliott 1022 N.W. 196th Seattle, WA 98177 SUBJECT: ENGINEERING FINAL FOR 16000 - 75TH PL. W. Dear Paul, LAURA M. HALL MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR We have.talked with the City Attorney regarding the utility easement and the disposition of the ten (10) foot dedication. Before we can sign off on the permit card, the land exchange and utility easement must be signed and both approved by the Council. The earliest date the easement can be placed on the consent agenda is April 7, 1992. In addition, the sidewalk contribution issue must be resolved as explained earlier. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt ELLIOTT/TXTST530 Alberts • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Fes- ,�� 4 � �� k/ edmonds family medicine clinic, p.s. November 27, 1991 City of Edmonds Department of Engineering Lyle Christman 250 5th North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Christman: FILE SGV®q So yg9I C 2 C1T, 0011111-, W, Robert B. Bettis, M.D.. A.B.F.P. Mark T. Hanson, M.D., A.B.F.P. Roger B. Oisson, M.D., A.B.F.P. Joseph G. Petrin, M.D.. A.B.F.P. Jeffrey F. Schlomeus, M.D., A.B.F.P. Paul A. Bagnulo, M.D.. A.B.F.P. Martha A.S. Bennett, M.D., A.B.F.P. David A. Becerril, M.D., A.B.F.P. Sandra G. Goss, M.D.. A.B.F.P. Jane Rock, M.A. Christine E. Rommel, Clinic Administrator 21616 - 76th W. Suite 111 Edmonds, WA 98026 (206) 775-9474 This letter is to followup on your phone conversation with both myself and my wife. Furthermore this letter is to confirm our conversation that the builder who removed our present boundary stakes from the Northern edge of our property in Meadowdale, specifically on Medowdale Beach, block 059 lot 1 and 2 will be required by the city to replace them. This surveying was done last April by Lovell Sauerland and I would like them contacted to make sure that this is done properly. Their address is: Lovell Sauerland 19400 33rd Ave. W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 I will also take the liberty of contacting them and giving them your name to make sure that this boundary line is re-established the way it was originally done. This.action is to be done at the Elliott's builders expense (the property immediately to the north of ours). Sincerely, ,� Robert B. Bettis, M.D. RBB:DR C Fic6—/rl'� 75-IA 1"Pe- ej ff �PHY .LACE A T TO R N E Y S AT November 19, 1991 Seattle Office: 2100 Westlake Center Tower 1601 Fifth Avenue Seattle. WA 98101-1686 (206)447-7000 czlvp,1 Nov le v 4.{ FAX: (206) 447-0215 Robert D. Johns Reed McClure 3600 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-7081 FILE L A W .John D. Wallace R. Miller Adams Douglas E. Albright Charles D. DeJong Lee Corkrum Robert T. Dollinger Wayne D. Tanaka Hilton H. Doumit Robert G. Andr4 David A. Ellenhorn Michael G. Wickstead Kathleen C. Healy Robert A. Kiesz Deanne C. Kopkas Steven A. Reisler Kent C. Mever W. Scott Snyder Elizabeth C.Y. Peng Christopher A. Washington Jessica G. Rickard James E. Haney Theresa A. Rozzano Phillip C. Raymond Susan N. Slonecker Charles D. Zimmerman Gil Sparks Carol D. Bernasconi William F. Joyce Counsel to the Firm Karen Sutherland John J. O'Donnell Stanbery Foster, Jr. Retired Ross D. Jacobson Raymond D. Ogden, Jr. Of Counsel James A. Murphy Re: Your Client --Elliott and the City of Edmonds Dear Bob: After our last conversation, I drafted a Notice of Abandonment of Easement and Relinquishment of Disputed Rights combining the notice and agreement which you drafted. In reviewing it with the engineering department, they noted that documents abandon "Utility and Access Easements". As our clients have been discussing, it appears that the issue is the pedestrian walkway easement and not the maintenance, construction or reconstruction of subsurface utility lines already in place. My understanding is that there are subsurface utility lines in that area. Therefore, if the City is going to release the easements, we will need a quitclaim not only for the right of way but also a subsurface utility easement across the 30 feet strip. Please review with your client whether they have objection to confirming the existence of the subsurface utility lines and the City's ability to maintain them within the 30 foot strip. If your client agrees, I suggest that we swap the Notice of Abandonment of Easement in exchange for a Subsurface Utility Easement across the 30 foot strip and a dedication of the right of way. I would appreciate your thoughts. Very truly yours, OGDEN MURPHY WALLACE ram' W. Scott Snyder WSS/klt WSS6469. I U0006.150.098 v fry :Ly�� cIvua� Wenatchee Office: 1 South Chelan Street, P. 0. Box 1606, Wenatchee. WA 98807, (509) 662-1954, FAX: (509) 663-1553 NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT OF EASEMENT AND RELINQUISHMENT OF DISPUTED RIGHTS WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds after due investigation has determined that the grantors of two utility and access easements which purport to transfer certain easement rights to the City of Edmonds did not have sufficient title or power to grant such easements, and WHEREAS, in order to clarify the title records of the true owners of the property purportedly encumbered by such easement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forbearance from the suit of the current property owners, the provision of right of way pursuant to a separately executed quit claim deed and the mutual benefits to be derived, the City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation hereby takes the following actions: 1. Abandonment of Easements and Relinquishment of Rights. Notice is hereby given that the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation hereby abandons and relinquishes any and all right, title, claim or interest purportedly created by either of the following documents: 1.1 Utility and Access Easements, dated July 17, 1979 and recorded under Snohomish County Auditors No. 7907230121; and 1.2 Utility and Access Easements, dated April 21, 1980 and recorded under Snohomish County Auditors No. 8005290186. Both of the above documents purport to create easements over the land described in the attached Exhibit A. WSS5493.1A/0006.150.053 -1- WSS/klt 11/07/91 2. Release of Rights to Current Owners. In consideration of their forbearance from suit,the City of Edmonds hereby conveys and quit claims, relinquishing all disputed rights in the tract described on the attached Exhibit A to Paul M. Elliott and Linda M. Elliott, a marital community and owners of the dominant estate, any old rights of any kind or nature in the real estate described on the attached Exhibit A, situated in Snohomish County, Washington, and purportedly granted to the City under the documents described in paragraph 1. This waiver and relinquishment, conveyance and quit claim is intended to convey any and all rights presently owned by the City to the grantees and their successors and assigns. DATED this day of . 1991. CITY OF EDMONDS: By: Larry S. Naughten, Mayor ATTEST: Rhonda J. March, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY W. Scott Snyder WSS5493.1A/0006.150.053 -2- WSS/k1t 11/07/91 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of F 1991, before me personally appeared Larry S. Naughten, to me known to be the Mayor of the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation, described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires: WSS5493.1A/0006.150.053 -3- WSSALt 11/07/91 EXHIBIT A A strip of land 30 feet in width embracing that portion of Meadowdale Beach Road lying between Blocks 29 and 59 in the Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Block 29; thence N8804514311W along the southerly line of said block and the northerly margin of said road 10.39 feet to intersect a line parallel with and 30 feet westerly of the centerline of 75th Place W. and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence 51605911711W along said parallel line 22.62 feet; thence 56200110011W 42.40 feet to intersect a line parallel with and 60 feet westerly of said centerline of 75th Place W., also being the easterly line of that portion of Meadowdale Beach Road as vacated by City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 2073; thence N1605911711E along said parallel line 33.55 feet to intersect the southerly line of said Block 29; thence N7202011711E along said southerly line and the northerly margin of Meadowdale Beach Road 31.44 feet to an angle point thereon; thence 58804514311E along said southerly line and road margin 4.29 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. WSS5502.1E/0006.150.098 WSS/klt 11/07/91 OSTREET CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Wod; s im Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering ` 890 . 194 August 22, 1991 Mr. and Mrs. Paul Elliott 1022 N.W. 196th St. Seattle, WA 98177 Re: Sidewalk contribution and ten (10) foot street dedication 16000 - 75th P1. W. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Elliott, LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR It has been approximately eight months since the above subject was first addressed and, to date, has not been resolved. The sidewalk contribution and ten foot -street dedication needs to be resolved as soon as possible to avoid delays at the end. If these issues are not resolved by the time sewer and water connections to your new residence are requested, we will not authorize the issuance of either permit until the subject items are resolved. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-3202, extension 289. Sincerely, ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator ELLIOTTI/TXTST530 -.. 1 i qc�_ Alberts • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 1 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 • 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771.3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 8go-1911 jtcET FILE August 15, 1991 Robert E. Young Robert E. Young Associates 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, WA 98133 Dear Mr. Young: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Subject: REQUIREMENTS FOR TREE RETENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE ELLIOTT SINGLE-FAMILY BUILDING PERMIT, PLAN CHECK #209 Thank you for your letter of August 8, 1991, regarding.the City's requirements pertaining to tree retention associated with the Elliott single-family building application. The information contained in your letter, along with the opinion of Keith Gates of Pac-West Tree Service were very helpful in my additional review of the tree retention issue. Based on the information provided in your letter, and discussions with the Building Official, I have determined that you may remove the trees from the site which were indicated on the site plans for retention. This conclusion is based on the opinion of the Building Official that the removal of the trees should not adversely affect soils stability. Additionally, it is a policy of the City that should trees which were intended to be retained, be removed during construction, that the applicant replant trees on the site in the vicinity of the trees which were removed. The policy indicates that the replacement ratio should be approximately 2-3 trees for each tree removed. As it appears that 4 deciduous trees are to be removed, you are required to replant eight (8) minimum 3-inch caliper deciduous trees. These trees are required to be planted prior to the final inspection of the residence by the City's Building Inspector. BLDG#20918-14-91.CORRES • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • • I believe the above determination adequately addresses the concerns raised in your letter. However, if you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 771- 3202. Sincerely, Jeffrey S. Wilson, AICP Current Planning Supervisor pc: Building Plan Check #209 Dick Mumma, Building Official John Bissell, Code Enforcement Technician BLDG #209/8-14-91.CORRES • August 8, 1991 Mr. Jeffrey S. Wilson City of Edmonds 250 - 5th Ave., N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Wilson: pak/t ORS One of the requirements noted on my copy of the approved plans,for my new home was to save four maple trees unless there was the possibility of the trees being.a hazard.. I had not paid close attention to the exact count or location of the trees noted in the surveys because it was always my assumption that the driveway, house and drainage system locations would require removal of the small number of trees on the property. Your requirement prompted me to engage a tree service specialist to review the condition and location of the trees in question. On August 7, 1991 we visited the site and discussed the feasibility of keeping the trees. With site work beginning on August 8 , I asked him to give me his recommendations, in writing, after we completed our review. They are attached. I approached your requirement with the idea to keep the trees if at all possible. Since one of the trees never existed and was shown incorrectly on the plan, and one is dead and needs to be removed, the subject is now the remaining two. With extensive limb and trunk surgery, these two trees could possibly be shaped to minimize the hazard of them falling. However, the site work around the bases of the trees for foundation, drainage and rockeries could weaken the root system and increase the possibility of the trees falling during a severe wind storm. In addition, I am concerned about the root system of these trees migrating to the elaborate drainage system I will be having installed and causing future lot drainage problems. I have concluded the trees should be removed. -If the City requires that the two living trees be cleaned up and retained on the property, I will need an indemnification from the City protecting my property from any damage caused by falling and/or root intrusion on the lot and house drainage system. In addition, I will ask the City to pay at least one half of the cost for the 11 Page Two extensive surgery needed on the trees, and commit to pay for removal of the trees if they should die within the next five years. Because we are now in the process of site preparation, I would appreciate a timely response. Sincerely, I. PAUL ELLIOTT By Authorized Agent '." ROBERT E. Y UNG Enclosure from Pac-West Tree Service cc: Paul Elliott ( 8 9 0 - 19 9 CITY OF E D M O N D S LARRY S. NAUGHTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Wor!;s • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR July 25, 1991 Robert Young 1110 N. 175th Seattle, WA 98133 Re: ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT At your request, I met with you on July 22, 1991 to discuss the current status of the Elliott single family residence permit. More specifically, we discussed the contents of Landau's most recent letter, dated July 17, 1991. You requested that I review two areas and make a determination. The areas were: 1) the question of past history of this site and, 2) the requirement for a piezometer on the site to monitor the current water level. Addressing the first question dealing with the history of the site: In Landau Associates last letter, they requested additional research of the history of the site be done. You, and Mark Dodd of Geo-Tech, argued as follows: A. Landau has alluded to past studies done on the site by other consultants that you have no knowledge of, or are unavailable to you for review. B. Additionally, Landau has referred to water levels in those studies that are also unavailable to you. C. You are not sure of the significance of the history of the site since you are willing to concede that the existing house on the site was damaged in the past by landslide activity. Addressing question two regarding the requirement of the piezometer on the site to identify the water level on the site, at our meeting you argued: A. That the water levels have been established through the existing test pits shown in the geological report. B. That drainage sytems have been installed to address water on the site and to de -water the hillside. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 11 • Robert Young July 24, 1991 Page Two After our meeting I again reviewed Landau's arguments, keeping in mind the intent of Or intent of this chapter was to employ the ex professionals to determine whether the site to minimize the risk of damage due to lands that the area has been identified as a land that a significant amount.of study has been Associates, Inc and by Geo-Tech regarding t a determination has to be made whether the with Chapter 1905 of the Edmonds Community letter and considered the dinance 1905 overall. The pertise of design could be stabilized enough lide while keeping in mind slide area. It is my belief done by both Landau his site, and at some point project is in compliance Development Code. My determination is that, in this case, the intent of Chapter 1905 has been satisfied for the following reasons: 1. While past history of the site helps us to identify where current and future problems may exist on a site, I am more concerned about the existing condition of the site and the effects that construction will have on the stability of the site, than I am the past history of the site. 2. To this end, Geo-Tech, in cooperation with the structural engineer on the site, have declared in their statements that they feel that the site will meet the City of Edmonds definition of stable, and that construction on the site will not impact the surrounding properties. Furthermore, the owners have, in writing, acknowledged their understanding of the risk of building on this site. 3. The installation of a piezometer would establish the current water levels on the site and could be checked against past records to see if there was a change in the water levels. This then would help determine if a problem existed with water levels on the site. If a problem was identified, drainage systems could be installed to de -water the site. It appears that such a drainage system has already been incorporated into the design and that Geo-Tech and their consulting representatives had anticipated water on the site and had taken action to resolve the problem before it was identified. In other words, the installation of the peizometer would identify a problem that has already been considered and incorporated into the design. r� U • Robert Young July 25, 1991 Page Three I hope this determination will help clear have posed. If you need any further exp at 771-3202. ncer _ -- �r i RICHARD R. MUMMA Building Official cc: Landau Associates, Inc. Geo-Tech Consultant ELLIOTT/TXTDOS62 p some of the questions you ation, feel free to call me CITY OF EDMONDS STREET FILERYS.NAUGMHnTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Wor!cs • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR `890.194 July 23, 1991 Robert E. Young Robert E. Young & Associates. 1110 North 175th St. Seattle, WA 98133 Re: Pedestrian walkway at Elliott's property, 16000 - 75th P1. W. Dear Mr. Young, After extensive review regarding an easement for the subject walkway, we agree with your findings. The City can find no supporting documents at this time referencing a pedestrian access easement across Elliott's property. We did, however, find if the owners of Lot 11 (now Elliott property) opted to relocate the existing walkway, the walkway could be placed on the northerly fifteen (15) feet of Lot 1, Blk 59, Plat of Meadowdale (Dr. Bettis' property), subsequently identified as a pedestrian access easement. In order to put this walkway issue to rest, we want to know if the Elliotts are going to exercise that option and relocate the walkway per their conversation with Mayor Naughten. The two remaining issues are the sidewalk contribution and street dedication, neither of which should hold up the permit. They must, however, be resolved before the final engineering inspection and issuance of certificate of occupancy. As I stated in our earlier telephone conversations, the issue regarding the ten foot dedication can only be resolved by the City Council. As I explained earlier, as far as the sidewalk contribution is concerned, if the Elliotts are not willing to contribute at this time, we need a letter from them stating they agree to pay the actual cost at the time of construction. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt c: Dick Mumma, Building Official Scott Snyder, City Attorney 9�-- Al berts • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • ELLIOTT/TXTST530 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 0 0 REED MCLURE A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION 3600 COLU,MBIA CENTER 701 FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-7081 FACSIMILE: 1206) 223-0152 (206) 292-4900 June 28, 1991 Mr. Paul M. Elliott 1022 N.W. 196th Seattle, WA 98177 $Tri"67 FILE IN REPLY REFER TO OUR FILE NUMBER WRITER'S DIRECT LINE (206) 386-7016 RE: City of Edmonds Easement for Utilities and Public Access Dear Mr. Elliott: This in response to your request for an evaluation of the legality of an easement claimed by the City of Edmonds across a property which you own at 16000 75th Place West, in Edmonds. The fact of the situation are relatively simple: You own Lot 11, Block 29 of the plat of Meadowdale Beach. Immediately to the south is Lot 1, Block 59 of the plat of Meadowdale Tidelands. Lot 1 was previously owned by the McCorkle, Childs, and Suydam families and will be referred to in this letter as "the McCorkle lot." Prior to 1979, your lot and the McCorkle lot were separated by North Meadowdale Road, which was an unopened forty foot (401) street right-of-way in this area. In 1979, the City of Edmonds vacated this portion of North Meadowdale Road and related portions of 75th Avenue West. At the time of or shortly after these roads was vacated, the predecessors of the McCorkle group granted an easement to the City for utilities and a public walkway across the northernmost fifteen feet (151) of the vacated road right-of-way. This easement area is the fifteen feet of the vacated road immediately adjacent to your lot and on the opposite side of the vacated road right-of-way from the McCorkle lot. No comparable easement was ever granted by you or any of your predecessors conveying any interest you or your predecessors may have had in the easement area. Mr. Paul M. Elliott June 28, 1991 Page 2 Recently, the City constructed a pedestrian sidewalk which meanders through the above -described easement area, although it is also apparent that in at least one location the walkway strays out of the easement area onto property that is clearly your lot and in which the City has no arguable title interest. Questions have arisen as regarding the City's easement. Those questions are: (1) When the road was vacated, was title to the area which includes the fifteen (151) foot easement transferred to the owners of the McCorkle lot or the owners of your lot? (2) If title to the area in which the easement is located was transferred to the owners of your lot, what interest, if any, did the City acquire by virtue of receiving the easement from the predecessors of the McCorkle group? (3) What rights, if any, do you, as the present owner of lot 11, have in the easement area? SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS The short answer to the questions above is as follows: (1) When the road was vacated, the owners of the two adjacent lots (your lot and the McCorkle lot) each automatically acquired title to the middle of the right-of-way. As a consequence, the owners of your lot acquired title to the northerly twenty feet (201) of the road, which obviously includes the most northerly fifteen feet (151) in which the City has located its walkway. (2) Since the owners of the McCorkle lot did not have any interest in the northerly fifteen feet (151) of the right-of-way, they had nothing to convey to the City. Since the easement from the owners of the McCorkle lot is ineffective and no comparable easement was conveyed by your predecessors, the City has no ownership interest. in the property where the walkway is located. (3) Since the City has no interest in the so-called easement area, the City did not have the right to construct the walkway. In effect, the City is trespassing on your property. You have the right to have the walkway removed by the City at the City's expense. If the City • • Mr. Paul M. Elliott June 28, 1991 Page 3 fails to do so, you would be owner of the property to have reimbursement from the City. within your rights as the it removed and seek For obvious reasons, it would be best to make arrangements with the City to have them either remove the walkway with their own forces or have you do it as part of your construction project, with prior arrangements that you be reimbursed by the City for the expense. DETAILED ANALYSIS The detailed legal analysis supporting our conclusions is as follows: 1. The Vacation of a Public Road Right -of -Way Transfers Title to Adiacent Owners to the Middle of the Street. One of the fundamental rules regarding vacation of public streets is that title to the vacated streets passes evenly to the adjoining property owners, who each acquire title to the middle of the vacated right-of-way. This rule is established both by statute and by our courts. The statute is R.C.W. 35.79.040, which provides: Title to vacated street or alley. If any street or alley in any city or town is vacated by the city or town council, the property within the limits so vacated shall belong to the abutting property owners, one-half to each. The rule is so well established that the Supreme Court, in 1967, ruled as follows in Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma v. City of Seattle, 70 Wn.2d 222, 226, 422 P.2d 799: We have never departed from the rule of law first stated by the Territorial Court 98 years ago in Burmeister v. Howard, 1 Wash. Terr. 207, 211 (1867): [W]hen an easement is taken as a public highway, the soil and freehold remain in the owner of the land encumbered only with the right of passage in the public; and upon a discontinuance of the highway, the soil and freehold revert to the owner, and in the case of streets and alleys, the proprietors of the adjacent lots own the soil, to the middle of the street, subject only to the right of passage in the public; Mr. Paul M. Elliott June 28, 1991 Page 4 and upon a discontinuance of such street or alley, the adjacent owners of lots on each side take the soil to the middle of the street. [Emphasis added.) This same rule has been applied innumerable times by the Washington courts. See, for example, Nystrand v O'Malley, 60 Wn.2d 792, 375 P.2d 863 (1962); Northwest Supermarkets, Inc. v. Crabtree, 54 Wn.2d 181, 338 P.2d 933 (1959); Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire R.R. Co., 79 Wash. 455, 140 Pac. 688 (1914); Simons v. Wilson, 61 Wash. 574, 112 Pac. 688 (1911); Norton v. Glass, 52 Wash. 341, 100 Pac. 734 (1909). Under these circumstances, title to the right-of-way was clearly split down the centerline of the road, with the owners of your lot acquiring title to the northerly half of the vacated area. Conversely, the owners of the McCorkle lot did not acquire any interest in the northerly half of the vacated road. 2. The "Easement" Granted by McCorkle's Predecessors Was Ineffective and the City Acquired No Interest. A second basic rule of law applicable to this situation is the rather obvious proposition that if one does not own property, one cannot sell or give it away. More legalistically, the Washington Supreme Court has simply indicated that a deed or other attempt to transfer a property interest from a person who does not have title to the property is "inoperative" and "the grantee takes nothing." See, Peterson v. Paulson, 24 Wn.2d 166, 163 P.2d 830 (1945). The application of this rule in the circumstances involving your property is that the City did not acquire any interest in your property when they received the easement from the owners of the McCorkle lot because the owners of the McCorkle lot did not have the power to convey an interest in property they did not own. Under these circumstances, any attempt by the City to use your property amounts to a trespass and you would be within your rights to take all necessary steps to remove any improvements placed in the area by the City. If the City ultimately refuses to cooperate, an action to quiet title to the property in you and for monetary damages for trespass would be available to resolve the issue. As discussed above, I recommend that you approach the City and try to convince them to voluntarily remove the pedestrian walkway which has been placed on your lot. Mr. Paul M. Elliott June 28, 1991 Page 5 One additional comment is important. You should be sure to advise the City of the recorded Covenant and Agreement between the McCorkle group and your immediate predecessors, the Stevens.. In that agreement, the McCorkle group acknowledged that they did not own an interest in the northern half of the vacated right-of-way and recognized that the pedestrian walkway would need to be relocated. That agreement further provides that the McCorkle group realizes that the pedestrian walkway will need to be relocated to the McCorkle property (in order to honor the commitment made by the prior owners of that property to provide a valid easement for utilities and the walkway to the City.) I suspect the City is unaware of the Covenant and Agreement described in the preceding paragraph and that your attempts to obtain the City's agreement to remove.the improperly located walkway will be much easier if the City understands that they have the right to obtain an equivalent easement from the owners of the McCorkle lot to relocate the walkway to that site and that the City is not losing its ability to have a pedestrian walkway in this general area. I trust this answers additional information at 386-7016. Very truly yours, REED McCLURE Ro e�r/t D. Jo s RDJ•sls:2235m your questions. If you need any or wish to discuss this, please call me ROBERT E. YOUNG ASSOCIATES architecture and planning 1110 north 175th street (206) 542-3192 seattle, washington 98133 363-6512 py June 14, 1991 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Ave., N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Addison L. Chrisman IV Dear Sir: STREET FILE Re: Paul Elliott Residence 16,000 - 75th Place, W. Edmonds, Washington Regarding your letter of May 9, 1991 that requests additional documents and also states that the existing walkway cannot be removed or used as a driveway, we feel that we have fulfilled the necessary requirements for engineering approval of this project. I have researched the ownership of the property underlying the walkway in question and the following is a brief summary of recent history of the property lying north and south of vacated north Meadowdale road. Lot 11, Block 29 lies to the north of the road. Lots 1 to 10, Block 59 lies to the south of the road. On January 1, 1969, Jerry Mattox and wife Ardis bought Lot 11 and they later sold it to Louise and Bruce Agnew. The Agnews sold Lot 11 to Charles and Margaret Stevens. They sold same to Paul and Linda Elliott, the present owners. On June 18, 1979, City of Edmonds vacated North Meadowdale Road between Lot 11 and Lot #1 to the abutting property owners, i.e., Lots 11 and 1, north half to Lot 11 and south half to Lot #1. On June 29th, 1979, William Childs and Ratree Childs and Gary Suydam and Luann Suydam purchased Lots 1 to 10. On April 21, 1980, the Childs and Suydams granted an'easement'to the City of Edmonds on the north 15 ft. of the vacated North Meadowdale Road which had been vacated to Lot 11, i.e., they granted an easement on property they did not own, thus invalidating said easement. We therefore request an immediate engineering approval in order that we can proceed with the project. Sincerely, ROBERT E. YOUN REY:sj Ste'' l T^ .__.. �-r. `'� ✓' • ROBERT E. YOUNG architecture and planning 1110 north 175th street (206) 542-3192 seattle, washington 98133 363-6512 May 15, 1991 ASSOCIATES • k CEiVED Ir;AT 1 n 1.4ji ENGNEERING T f 11.E City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Ave., N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr.Addison L. Chrisman 1V Re: Paul Elliott Residence 16,000 - 75th Place, W. Edmonds, Washington Dear Sir: In response to your request, we are hereby asking for a waiver from the engineering requirement for the installation of a storm drainage detention system for the above mentioned residence. As shown on the submitted storm drainage plan, permanent drainage will not enter the city's system but will be channeled directly through an 18" culvert on Burlington Northern Railroad property to Puget Sound. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ROBERT E. YOU G REY:sj S i RtEEl FILE 6'g0-199,J • STREET FILE 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS• WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering May 9, 1991 Robert E. Young Robert E. Young & Assoc. 1110 N. 175th Seattle, WA 98133 Re: Engineering requirements for Elliot single family 16000 - 75th P1. W. y residence Dear Mr. Young, LARRY S. NAUGH M/ PETER E. HA DIREC I have completed the engineering review on the subject drawings, before I can give engineering approval, the following documents submitted: but 9 must be >✓1) Letter from Burlington Northern Railroad authorizing use o 18" culvert to channel subject uncontained water to Pu et f their Truck route plan, g Sound. Letter requesting a waiver for an on -site detention system. Copy of the 10' right-of-way dedication to the Cit • y m• Cash contribution for sidewalk construction, y Site restoration bond. Because development in that area has been sporadic, we are requiring the construction of the sidewalk at the time of hnot ouse construction. Instead, we are collecting a cash contribution t Placed in a special account for the construction of the sidewalko be later date. Based on the subject property width Mr. contribution is $920, at a Elliotis Since construction is in the Meadowdale slide area, a site r bond is required in the event existing utilities and roadway damaged b restoration The amount ofstheebondcausis basedd by eonotheruction of the subject house. width of the property. The amount for site lrestorationniscrojss the �•� RECEIVED MAY 1 0 tss� • IncorPorated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — t 1 I,:__ _ iiobert E. Younn A. A.— • Robert E. Young May 9, 1991 Page 2 STREET FILE In addition, the existing public walkway is not -to be removed nor can it be used as a driveway. We would be receptive to a plan for relocation of the walkway, as shown on your drawings, but would require detailed plans on how, where, and who would construct the walkway. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-32029 extension 289. Sincerely,. ADDISON L. CHRISMAN.IV Engineering Inspector ALC%sdt c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator (-tj — ?)[ e) C3 �j L` v 0 LEEREQUR/TXTST530 C> L L LAQ fJ C) I JCA,,V� " A-Zrz� __ p v lair �� �ti0 0 STREET FILE 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TFI AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning - Parks and Recreation • Engineering 890-1g y May.9, 1991 Robert E. Young Robert E. Young & Assoc. 1110 N. 175th Seattle, WA 98133 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Re: Engineering requirements for Elliot single family residence 16000 - 75th P1. W. Dear Mr. Young, PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR I have completed the engineering review on the subject drawings, but before I can give engineering approval, the following documents must be submitted: 1) Letter from Burlington Northern Railroad authorizing use of their 18" culvert to channel subject uncontained water to Puget Sound. 2) Truck route plan. 3) Letter requesting a waiver for an on -site detention system. 4) Copy of the 10' right-of-way dedication to the City. 5) Cash contribution for sidewalk construction. 6) Site restoration bond. Because development in that area has been sporadic, we are not requiring the construction of the sidewalk at the time of house construction. Instead, we are collecting a cash contribution to be placed in a special account for, the construction of the sidewalk at a later date. Based on the subject property width, Mr. Elliot's contribution is $920. Since construction is in the Meadowdale slide area, a site restoration bond is required in the event existing utilities and roadway are damaged by a slide caused by the construction of the subject house. The amount of the bond is based on the total restoration across the width of the property. The amount for site restoration is $55,000. 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Robert E. Young May 9, 1991 Page 2 In addition, the existing public walkway is not to be removed nor can it be used as a driveway. We would be receptive to a plan for relocation of the walkway, as shown on your drawings, but would require detailed plans on how, where, and who would construct the walkway. If you have any questions, please call me at 171-3202, extension 289. Sincerely, - ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator LEEREQUR/TXTST530 12 Q a Alberts -! TO: Permit Coordinator, Building Division 8J90 FROM: Lyle Chrisman�gineering Inspector ADDRESS: `15 PL•%V DATE: 11-9-90 OWNER: PLAN CK# ZcZ)g_ After review of the subject permit application the following is require �1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS..........' 7:00 a.m. 10:00 p.m. (ECC 5.30.110) WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS..10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. '42. A separate Right -of -Way Construction Permit is required for all work on City party. (ECDC 18.60) ^M . Connection to City water system required. Separate charge for water meter. (ECDC 7.30) ' 44. Connection to City sanitary sewer system required; obtpin separate permit. LID # 210 Fees paid: Ye" No Charge $W�—C'_ (ECDC 18.10) `-J 5. Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10) V 6. Driveways must be paved a minimum of 20 feet back from City right-of-way; separate permit required. (ECDC 18.80.060C) 7. Driveway slope not to exceed 14% without waiver. Waiver granted to f?.,- o (ECDC 18.80.060D) 8. Back water valve required if downstairs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. (ECC 7.20) ""49. Builder/Owner responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 18.30.030D) No burning of construction refuse without permit from Fire Department. --411. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. -412. Street shall be kept clean of debris, dirt, mud, and construction materials. Contractor responsible for dust control. (ECDC 18.30) "v13. Inspection required on drainage system, catch basin installation, driveways, and sidewalks. Contractor responsible to contact City for inspection. (ECDC 18.30) '14. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to. property. If intersection is involved, installation of wheelchair access may be required. Permittee to meet with Engineering staff to determine extent of repair prior to issuance of permit. (ECDC 18.90) v15. Underground wiring required on all new construction; and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 500 of the total assessed value of the structure.. (ECDC 18.05.010) 'V 16. No work shall be done within 15 feet of streams or 10 feet from any closed drainage facility. ., A '17. A final engineering inspection is required prior to the Building Division granting occupancy of the building or structure. (ECDC 18.80) 'V 18. p- *;�J o !q. StC45�w6L6KEMD - """A 21. Uhvscv a� iv E:5&- <«WOcT6 s�-1 etj-Acx ai L�oj I Noa'2i; per N�CC�r 1 4 t .M c c= Lot- 11 � V, M�'. cU pm= CHECKLIST":. A/ =RESS: PROJECTNAM_ Pit Reviewed by: (initial datey PLANNING wrR/swR I STREET ENGNRNG FIRE BUILDING SINGLE FAMILY/MULTIPLE/CamMERCIAL (Circle On') SETBACKS CHECKED - Planning VARIANCE/SETBACK ADJ. 117771111 ///////// 7777771 777777W 7MM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ///////// //////// //*//////// 2 - .7TTTR77 77TfTF7 TW7-7777. ADB REQUIREMENTS CHECKED 3 7 7 7 7 7 17 7/ 7T77Tr77 777-7777777 OTHER JAM REQUI 4 1VfA1;MzW94& ry ENVIRONMERML ACCESS SLOPE & VEHICLE ACCESS /7/717177 77-7/77/77 DRAINAGE PLAN (o. site) Mg XqM A40V 11111111IT177=TMIIII '71171'?l 2 STREET FILE '777 IM/M/ '2 77777777. TTMI LEGAL DESCRIPTION. vFaiFicATicN-*,"-,E)tl��':".. 141411114'111111111 QUIT V�5 - I I //Mf ////// /77777777 ///////// 7777W ///////// Lo eyisr upury,", EASEMENT - PUBLIC/PRIVATE CALCULATE SEWERCONNECTION IP NO LID# 7777M 11117 #44012 P1AT/SUBDMSICN REQUIREMENTS- 0440 13 GHT-OP-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REM•.'./Z, 4 L I ' � (97'st ozo 65��47,0;17 FM= REM FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMMS 5 L SOILS 0ONDITICNS & GROUND WATER FIELD CHECKED 4W-,PzxW 4or 16 STREET"PAVING RJWR13) 1111111U 17 CURB AND GVITER REQUIRE6'' 1177R7 7 it SIDEWALK REQUIRED 7TIM111 w CCUP M FOR DRIVEWAY WWI 7 7 7777TRU 20 STREET SIGN REXP 21'NAME OTHER- SIGNING 22 4, 23 SIDE"SEWER Ammium, . EXISTING WATER MAIN SIZE'�­` M C> ,.I: 77TTI= it 24 WATER METER SIZE �v 4 25 — SERVICE LINE SIZE 7777777777 26 HYDR4NT REQUIRED 27 HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING 51/14 - 28 CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION'REOD 777/77 9 WATER METER CHARGE REOD. L 30 FIRE LINE CHARGE REm spRINKLYR: 0 STREET cur U= 141444444 WQ" 32 OPEN DITCH EXISTING 11111111L 40q1W 3 3 777777777777777 .RMD 17'%17101�111 34 CULVERT Rmp 35�771 SIZE 71 it 7 cATcH nAsn; R= I WELL 1UIM �;; .. INDICATED ON SITE PLAN M777M TM77777 38 SHOULDER DRAINAGE MAINTAIN SHALE OPI -N MMFF U/ I Ui 1411444.1 1 39 MISCI A%W40Y,4� �Aoll .: . - : � .. 7777777 1 /111/1/// 717170 7 ///Z///// //-.f - 941 40 No TREED FILE REVIEWED BY: 6M6 !!9�2'� PLANNING MGR. ENGINEERING MGR. PUBLZC WORKS MGR. • STREET FILE � CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 8g0_1g y - November 27, 1990 Lee Atherton Seawood Homes, Inc. 7500 - 212th St. S.W., Suite 210 Edmonds, WA. 98020 Re: Elliot Single Family Residence 16000 - 75th P1. W., Edmonds J Dear Mr. Atherton: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR In reviewing the civil drawings of the subject residence, the drawings indicate that all storm drainage is directed to an 18" culvert that runs under the Burlington Northern Railroad (BNR). Before I can complete my review, there are two things I need: (1) a letter from the railroad giving you permission to direct the subject storm drainage into their culvert, and (2) the culvert must be field located since the recent Beck storm drainage basin study was unable to locate said 18" culvert. Should the BNR decline use of their 18" culvert, an on -site detention system would be required and revised civil drawings submitted. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ADDISON L. CHRISMAN IV Engineering Inspector ALC/sdt c: Robert E. Young ///o AJ , 17s ELLIOT/TXTST530 Ps rc, Alberts --.,n • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • STREET FILE. • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: 189p Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation Engineering 1994 November 26, 1990 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR ht'jyl l/Ia7 A9 d Robert E. Young Robert E. Young Associates 1110 N. 175th St. Seattle, WA. 98133 Re: Driveway slope waiver for Elliot residence 16000 - 75th P1. W. Dear Mr. Young: After reviewing your request for a driveway slope waiver at the proposed subject address, you are hereby granted a waiver from the maximum 14 o to 17.4 0. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer ALC/sdt YOUNG/TXTST530 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan i4tlomo ROBERT E. YOUNG ASSOCIATES a E c E o v E architecture and planning O C T 2 3 1990 1110 north 175th street (206) 542-3192 seattle, washington 98133 363-6512 October 22, 1990 Mr. Gordon Hyde Office of the City Engineer 205 Fifth Ave., N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Paul Elliott Residence CU-69-90 16000-75th Place, W-. Edmonds, Washington Dear Sir: We would like to request a waiver from the driveway slope requirement of_ 14% maximum. Due to the existing grade, the proposed driveway for the above residence will have a maximum slope of 17.4/ at the steepest point. (See Sheet #2, Grading Plan by Group Four, Inc. that was submitted with CU-69-90 and Building Permit #209). We believe the proposed driveway slope will not adversely affect public health, safety, or the general welfare. It is both economically and environmentally reasonable as it will follow closely the location of an existing paved path. A turn around is provided at the end of the drive if needed by police or fire emergency vehicles. We do not foresee any pedestrian or bicycle safety hazard. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ROBERT E. YO NG REY:sj cc. Mr. and Mrs. Paul Elliott A 4 is LANDAU I/Al ASSOCIATES, INC. Geoenvironmental Engineering and Technologies BUILDING • OCT 2 61990 October 25, 1990 City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020, Attn: Ms. Jeannine L. Graf RE: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW PROPOSED ELLIOTT RESIDENCE LOT 11, BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH (CORNER OF MEADOWDALE ROAD AND 75TH PLACE WEST) MEADOWDALE AREA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON In accordance with your request, we have completed a preliminary geotechnical review of plans and other submitted documents concerning the above -noted proposed residence. Our review follows requirements outlined within City Ordinance No. 2661. A list of the documents we reviewed is included as Attachment 1. The site is located within the Meadowdale landslide area at the northwest corner of the intersection of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West. This property was one of several properties involved in landslide movement during the winter of 1955-56. Excerpts and a portion of a geologic map from a 1968 Dames & Moore report provide an historical perspective on that earlier movement. That information is contained in Attachment 2. Our review of submitted documents for this project indicates that there are several inconsistencies and/or omissions. These are summarized as follows: • City Ordinance No. 2661 requires that a lead design professional be identified for each project. We are assuming that Robert E. Young of Robert E. Young and Associates is this lead design professional, and that general note No. 4 on Sheet A-1 is his declaration. If our assumption is incorrect, the lead design professional must be identified and a declaration provided. • The August 29, 1990 geotechnical review and declaration by Geotech Consultants, Inc. (Geotech Consultants) provides a general assessment of the risk due to landslide movement. City Ordinance No. 2661 requires that the geotechnical declaration provide an evaluation setting forth the statistical probability of earth movement within a 25-year period. It is recommended that the City request the statistical probability for this site. P.O. BOX 1029 • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020-9129 • (206) 778.0907 • FAX (206) 778-6409 • On page 3 of Geotech Consultants' August 30,1989 report, it is stated that this site is no more at risk from landsliding than neighboring properties. We take exception to that statement since the movement that occurred during the winter of 1955-56 documents that this property has a history of recent movement. Geotech Consultants should comment on the 1955-56 movement (and any other past reports of movement at the site) and confirm that their conclusions concerning slope stability are still valid (if appropriate). • The reclassification of slide potential within the Meadowdale landslide by GeoEngineers Inc. in February 1985, subsequent to the City -installed drainage improvements, was based on an overall lowering of the ground water surface. Where ground water is still at or very near the ground surface, it is probable that the risk of movement is still as high as it was prior to City improvements (i.e., 90 percent probability of movement within a 25-year period rather than 30 percent probability as noted on the most current City map). Because actual ground water conditions at the site have not been well documented, it is not possible to accurately assess this subject. For this reason, we strongly recommend that the design professionals involved in this project consider the installation of piezometers for assessment of ground water and slope conditions. • Sheet 1 of the Rough Grading Plan identifies earthwork quantities to include 580 cubic yards of cut and 40 cubic yards of fill. These values are based on a 15-inch stripping depth. Geotech Consultants states that all surface vegetation, organic matter, existing fill, and any other deleterious material should be removed from beneath building and pavement areas. Since fill and organic soil thickness at the various exploration locations ranges from about 2 to 5 feet, the anticipated stripping depth appears to be substantially underestimated. For example, Test Pit 1, which is located approximately between the garage and hobby shop, contained 5 feet of fill. There is no suggestion on the Rough Grading Plan that 5 feet of material will have to be removed from this area. Having over 500 cubic yards of cut or fill will trigger the requirement for a conditional use permit. Probably more importantly though, proper estimation of cut and fill quantities will allow closer estimates of earthwork time and expense requirements. • Once earthwork quantities (and costs) have been properly estimated, we suggest that the lead design professional reassess both structural mat and pile foundation alternatives. Cost factors aside, the design professionals involved in this project should evaluate if a pile foundation would afford a significantly higher factor of safety for the proposed residence, especially within that portion which most closely borders the western slope. • The various building sections shown on Sheets S-6 and S-7 do not suggest the need for a minimum 12-inch layer of compacted structural fill, or the need to remove and replace other existing unsuitable soil as recommended in the Geotech Consultants' report. The sections also do not show the location of the required footing drains. It has been our experience that unless this type of 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. information is provided on the project plans, there is a potential that these items will be overlooked during construction. • Geotech Consultants recommends temporary cut slopes of 1.25:1 (H:V) maximum. The Rough Grading Plan (Sheet 1 of 2) shows maximum 1:1 (H:V) slopes. This inconsistency must be resolved. • The August 30, 1989 report prepared by Geotech Consultants recommends maximum permanent cut slopes of 2.5:1 (H:V). Permanent fill slopes (granular fill) are not to exceed 2:1 (H:V). The finished grading plan (Sheet 2), however, shows proposed permanent slopes which exceed these values. This is most noticeable along the south side of the driveway where a 1:1 (H:V) cut is proposed. We recommend that.the proposed grading plan be reevaluated and any inconsistencies with Geotech Consultants recommendations be resolved. • The Rough Grading Plan calls for a temporary cut at the location of the tallest proposed retaining/basement wall across almost the entire width of the lot. We recommend that the design professionals involved in this project consider constructing the various foundation elements in segments across the slope, thereby minimizing the amount of excavation opened at one time. This construction technique is commonly used in areas of unstable soil. The garage foundation scheme incorporates a conventional footing and structural slab. It appears that much of the building load will be transmitted to the conventional foundation. Since foundation support is supposed to be obtained from a structural mat, it is recommended that Geotech Consultants comment on the present design. • City Ordinance No. 2661 requires a tree cutting plan. Note 9 on Sheet 1 of the grading plan indicates that all trees are to be removed from the site. The City should determine if this note meets the intent of their ordinance. • The City's ordinance also requires that the geotechnical consultant include or comment on the environmental checklist. While most, if not all, of the geotechnical components have been addressed in the environmental checklist, Geotech Consultants' report does not specifically discuss the environmental checklist. The City should determine if Geotech Consultants must provide a written comment on the environmental checklist. • Ordinance 2661 also requires that a site topographic map be prepared by a licensed land surveyor. While topographic information is included, a formal survey properly stamped and containing the required items was not provided. We recommend that the plans and other submitted documents be returned to the applicant for action. The lead design professional should review the documents and make whatever appropriate changes are necessary to be consistent with the geotechnical report recommendations. In addition, Geotech Consultants should evaluate and comment on specific issues raised herein. Please note that Landau Associates did not review structural calculations. 3 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Please call if you have questions concerning this review, or require the services of Landau Associates for subsequent review services. WDE/TAH/njb No. 74-21.10 EDM0NDS\ELL11CMLET 3 copies submitted Attachment 4 Very truly yours, LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By: William D. Evans, CPG Project Manager and Theodore A. Hammer, PE Project Engineer LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTACHMENT 1 • Sheets A-1 through A-10 of Project Plan, Robert E. Young, Architect, July 27, 1990. • Sheets S-1 through S-8 of Project Plans, MBF, Inc., July 27, 1990. • Sheets 1 and 2 - Rough and Finish and Storm Drainage Plans, Robert E. Young and Associates, August 16, 1990. • Sub -Basin Map, Robert E. Young and Associates, undated (superimposed on Sheet 2 of 2, Finish Grading Plan). • Geotechnical Engineering Study, Geotech Consultants, Inc., August 30, 1989. • Geotechnical Review of Declaration, Geotech Consultants, Inc., August 29, 1990. • Hydrology Report and Calculations, Group Four, Inc., July 31, 1990. • Structural Calculations, MBF, Inc., July 27, 1990 (Note: only geotechnical- related items were reviewed). • Environmental Checklist,- signed by Robert E. Young (Group Four, Inc.), August 31, 1990. • Landslide Acknowledgement Declaration, Paul M. Elliott (owner), August 27, 1990. • Application for Pipe Line Permit - Burlington Northern Railroad, Group Four, Inc., August 10,1990. EDMONMELU1022.LEr 5 AZTACHME Nr 2 and roads in the area. It is our understanding that the affected area was approximately 800 feet in a north -south direction and extended from above the railroad tracks to a point immediately east of 75th Place West. An examination of the existing roadway indicates that a small amount of movement has taken place since 1947. A Washington State Department of Highway's geologist, Mr. Arthur Ritchie, studied the area after this period of move- ment and recommended the construction of a perimeter ditch in the undis.turbed clay layer immediately below the clay -sand contact. This ditch was to serve as an interceptor and to prevent the water emerging near the bottom of the sand formation from saturating the finer grained soils downhill. It is our understanding that a problem developed in obtaining the required easements, and the project was abandoned in its early stage with only a few hundred feet of ditch completed. It appears since that time that little or no maintenance o.f the ditch has been accomplished. We understand the area immediately east of the 1947 movement and extending to the base of the escarpment was regraded at one time with the intent of developing a mobile park but because of zoning restrictions was not developed. The eastern portion of this area is now very poorly drained with ponded water. In late 1955 and early 1956, movement occurred north in the inter- section of North Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West. The movement damaged many of the homes in the area and resulted in the destruction of at least two homes. We understand this movement occurred after several days of heavy rains combined with a 10-inch snowfall. As in the case following the slide in 1947, another program to install the interceptor ditch north of the North Meadowdale Road was initiated. It is our understanding that easements were i i OAMCS L` MOOQE I obtained; but construction difficulties halted the work in its early stage with, again, only a small portion of the work completed. It is our understanding that since the movements in 1955-1956, only minor movements have occurred in the area and that most of these problems involved relatively minor sloughing of the steep escarpment. The ancient movements which have occurred in the area appear to be currently stable. These very large-scale massive landslides were far greater in extent than the more recent movements and have probably been inactive for a long period of time. The Great Northern Railroad Company has placed a protecting riprap wall along the Puget Sound side of their trackage and have thus eliminated damaging erosion by wave action. This has added to the general stability of the area, and the now -stable shoreline probably decreases substantially the risk of,reactivation of the major older landslides. The recent more serious slides appear to have occurred almost entirely within the formation.of silt and clay. It is probable that at least a portion of these soils had been disturbed by earlier movements. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS It is our opinion that it is not only feasible to install sanitary sewers in the area, but that such an installation would be of benefit. Groundwater has been a.major factor in the instability of the area; reduction of the volume of water to the area will decrease risks of future damaging earth movements. It should be recognized, however, that at least in certain areas, the maintenance cost of the system would probably be high; unless substantial other work to improve stability is accomplished, the area will remain subject to occasional small landslides and reactivation of older move- ments. Sanitary sewers would reduce the water available to the clay soils; DAMES C MOORE GEOLOGIC MAP FEET 100 0 100 200 S00 400 S00 .E tREA OF _ WENT ANCIENT SLIDE SCARP e� APPROXIMATE AREAS OF OVI GLACIAL TILL: PPEDONINANTLY LtGNT GRAY NI XTLRE OF SILTY SANG At.O G�AWELl VERY COMPACT EXCEPT WEATHERED SURFACE LAYER OF TMREt TO FIVE FEET, VERY LOW PERMEABILITY. 00 OUTWASM DEPOSITS: PREDOMINANTLY BROWN SAI.O AND GRAVELLY SAhO. COMPACT AND MITT PERMEABILITY. OC GLACIAL CLAY: FINELY LAMINATED TO MASSIVE GRAY AND BLUE -GRAY SILT AND CLAY. ESSENTIALLY IMPERMEABLE. KEY, CONTACTS BETWEEN GEOLOGIC UNITS, CONTACTS BETWEEN GEOLOGIC UNITS, LOCATIONS APPROXIMATE. ow►wwIMIs s woomo I j! GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 Rr�:iiVC3 AUG 3 11930 PERMIT COUNTER August 29, 1990 JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott c/o Robert E. Young.& Associates 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 Subject: Geotechnical Review and Declaration Proposed Single Family Residence Lot on Northwest Corner of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. and Mrs. Elliott: In accordance with the request of Robert Young, Geotech Consultants Inc. has reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the plans prepared for the proposed single-family dwelling to be constructed on the lot northwest of the intersection of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West in Edmonds, Washington. The plans we reviewed were provided by Robert Young and Associates and consisted of Architectural Sheets Al through A10 which were undated; Sheets S1 through S8 dated July 27, 1990 prepared by MBF Inc.; and two sheets of grading and drainage plans prepared by Group Four dated August 10, 1990. Based upon our review, it is our opinion that the proposed development, once completed, will not increase the risk of earth movement beyond that which the neighbors assume. How- ever, there are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. The owner must assume these risks when choosing to build and live in a documented landslide such as is the case in the Meadowdale area. Construction can be more difficult as the subsurface is more of a heterogeneous mixture of soils that can vary widely within a small distance. The recommendations and opinions that we have expressed in our report and in this letter are professional opinions. No warranty is expressed or implied. Our approach throughout this study has.been to develop geotechnical solutions which will not increase the risk of instability either to the subject property, or to neighboring properties. -, a Paul and Linda Elliott JN 89300 August 29, 1990 Page 2 Geotech Consultants Inc. should be on the site intermittently throughout the excavation and foundation construction process. This will allow us to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated p,iorto the start of construction. . The contractor should be prepared throughout construction to cover slopes with plastic or to backfill the excavation as necessary if localized instability does occur. Providing the above recommendations are adopted, the following "Declaration Statement is valid: It is our opinion that the plans and specifications generally conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical study. The risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties will not increase due to this development, subject to the conditions stated in the report and follow-up letters. If there are any questions, service, please contact us. MKD:JRF:cka or if we can be of further Respectfully submitted, GEOTEECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark K. Dodds Senior Engineer �am e i R. inley Jr., P.E. f \x 6000 ,oG !•t/kSS FILE#8g0915 S DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Issuance of Demolition Permit to demolish old residence 27*4 S404is Proponent Seawood Homes, Inc. Location of proposal, including street address, if any 16000 76th P1. W., Edmonds Lead Agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. X There is no comment period for this DNS. _ This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible Official Duane V. Bowman Position/Title Assistant City Planner Address 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds WA Date December 29, 1989 Signature hone 771-3202 X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m. January 8, 1990 by filing a written appeal citing reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Duane V. Bowman to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. I • , , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEMOLITION PERMIT #890915 1. No clearing of vegetation on the lot is permitted in conjunction with the demolition of the residence. 2. All exposed areas shall be mulched with straw to minimize erosion. 3. The existing walkway shall not be disturbed without approval of the City of Edmonds. a qnt2j — J-�'L ur0^c��p p� CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING ACTION REPORT IN 3411. SUSPENSE DATE: Date:��P/ice 9 Time: i� b File N Attachments: = Yes �,� �� Q No SUBJECT: REQUESTOR: N /'ram/✓Cj/G �7"��ii�P1�1fS� _ PHONE: REQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE CONTACT IN OFFICE r---j OTHER: RECEIVED BY: Dnnrr Tn. 00 MMMM MM ACTION: W tav All Concerned Notified . /� Action Completed/File Q See EXPO PagP_3B` By.SEQNNAB.ROWDER.J.. f Herald Writer EDMONDS " ,When .,.Margi Stevens got the call.that tier liouse'wa§ involved.. in, an : car accident;she started to laugh and asked,: "Was my : house driving?" ButStevens soon found .out thatthe call, was:. no joke: ;A;;truck pulling ,a with, a;backhoe,slammed.irito vacant house at 45 '; a M. `:Tuesday: The;only. Ching untouched i.n ` the wake:of the :dump truck was a "d'r Sale sign.in front.of hcr.:driveway at the corner of 76t1� `i Av'eni�e W..an( . Nteadowdale Road i a;;7�r�-�r-� ���,� 1 This isnot the first tiple the'.hom perched on - the hill overlooking ffie Puget;:. Sound shore ;h been:`hi(:. Snohomis1f`C6unty Council;'Men`i66r Bruce Agnew,said one of the Yeasdns he sold .th"e liouse a'-year;:ago was -because' of,a'.similar accident:r,;; Two :years.ago `:a' truck: carrying`a: load' of' firewood -could. not' make the same turn: The wood. broke loose a'h _one giant Iog came',tumbling.ttirougli .Agnew's kitchen window: luckily, liis ----family house:: I really think:. the city. should` baii all trucks from that road," Agnew said.' "It is a dangerous situation not only for that. house but others ._on. the road:"; Tuesday, the,• truck,,,. driven Uy: Wayne Conyers, .58, of Granite Fall,,,. came. down:. the -steep .:incline :of Meadowdale and could not negotiate - the turn.an_76th_Avenue W, or brake'to ' a stop:..i': The backhoe. ; fell off-: the trailer, when.the truck struck two trees as I'l . plunged :down', the. dirt. private. drive, before'..,slammin'g:,:;into, - the _house.` :Conyers walked away with no injuries:, . Edmonds ; ;police ;;;,;estimate ' the damage to`•the.dump;:truck at $10,00' The damage to,. the house is :an estimated _,$6,000. , Neighbors`„stood, above',_the' drive:... ' way.:and looked down.on the damage. (2"Na, STATE OF WASHINGTON PAGE , 's L:fg IRAt+ICWAY. POLICE TRAFFIC COIN REPORT PRIVATE WAY 45 kr A DATf OF COLA ION AY OF COLLISION TIME U5 COUNTY c SUN. IMON. ��JWED jQ'S fRI L-12-t [3 N C] f e&IN OR TOWN NAME 9 NO OF STREET OR HIGHWAY MILES 0 S OW OOF 1� Ulm 0 Nj , Won tA Gr INTERSECTJNG WIjH: ST ET OR ROAD N ,�NON INTERSECTION -7 V BETWEEN STREET 9 STREET _R, - i... 7 � It IM, 7- t� 1;` Z221 DISTANCE &DIRECTION FROM REFERENCE, CROSS STREET OR NEAREST MILE POST MILES N S E W FEET 0 El ID C) OF ACCIDENT MILEAGE CODE MILESIN HUNDREDTHS DIAGRAM DATA COLLISION INVOLVED AGE 0 HIT & RUN SEVERITY: j)eUELIL 0 S" TOTAL NO. O. KILLED_NO. INJURED ,.OF VEHICLES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 0 FIRE 0 STOLEN RESULTED VEHICLE vqm�4 �41 I•RD 'CR'41 TWTOR C S OBJECT STRUCK (NAME OF 085 STRUCK AND Ow ER'SNAME) 4e':C _f -bon EST. DAMAGE $ UNITNO.2'�" .,r I� J -_.0 PEDESTRIAN' .91VER'S NAME: LAST FIRST MIDDLE SNAME. LAST FIRST MIDDLE J24 STREET I RUUKt� �MRV242, CITY STATE ZIPCODIE PH NE NO -91619 71 7.6-77 DRIVER'S LICENSE (O. STATE DATEOFBIRTH NIL W 1._7J60 W-A STREET CITY STATE ZIPC DE PHONENO. v. F-70b-,� l- DRIVER'S LICENSE NO STATE SEX OF DAY MO. .DAY SIR BIRTH YR. .Icbm WE CU I FIRM c of) 5T, 'c CIL) NAME PHONE NO. 0 1. EYES IWEIGHT HEIGHT kj�pl OCCUPATION . FIRM HONE NO. EYES rIGHT If CHECK IF OPERATOR WAS DRIVING A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE AS AN EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER. I - - ❑AS EMPLOYEE DRIVING A COPWERCIAL CHECK(. EMOYEE OF ANOTHER. 9 CODES IN,+ 3 INJURY j:14 RESTRAINT- 5 EJECTION 16 1s1A0,T0,RCY C&L I CLASS SYSTEM 6w_ I j RNTRAINT MOTORCYCLE CODE 10, + 3 CLASS 'Y 1 5 EJECTION 16 SAFETY m NATURE OF INJURIES RFMOVEDFROM 0 HELI. PRIVATE C] AMBUL ANCE 0. R 0 1 NOT SCENERY: CALRICE\❑ COPIER VEHICLE ❑ TRANSP. 77 NATURE UP INJURIES r)t)n& 'POLICE PRIVATE 0 NOT REVEDFROM 0 AMBULANCE COPTER VEHICLE ❑TRANSP SCE EI 0 C] HELI .YEAR MAKE (DODGE-CHEV.) V VEH. COLOR LiNSE PLATE NO. • r- MODEL (DART -NOVA) STYLE (2 DR.-CONV.)-; STATE TRAILER PLATE NO. STATE IATA `_ ..YEAR MAKE (DODGE-CHEV.) MODEL( RT-NOVA) ZJFROM VEH. COLOR UUNSE PLATE NO. STATE PLATE N VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NO. VE ICO 7 REGISTERED OWNER: LAST FIRST MIDDLE PHONE NOW 0 1"- CAADDRESS OF OWNER Amt tl l REGISTERED OWNER. LAST FIRST MIDDLE 0 ADDRESS OF OWNER 311 NAME 9 ADDRESS OF INSURANCE CO. OR AGENT r,-t I KJ VW_ NAME 9 ADDRESS OF INSURANCE CO. OR AGENT SHADE IN DAR 9 OP ...... 10 OTTOM �76) �A NCTIONAL fol,�14EQDMGE CITATI NO, TAlION NO VEH DAMAGE 0 DI SABLING 0 FUNCTIONAL 0 OTHER DMGE. S HADE IN DAMAGED AREA 2 3 4 9 Top S 7 6 CHARGE L) J'L4 11 CHARGE E EST -DAMAGE -DRIVEN r-1) 'AWA REMAINED TOY 4E9too . _. 1 +CHA DRIVEN REMAINED 0 AWAY 1:1 TOWED 11 AWAY BY: EST. DAMAGE $ DI GRAM OF ON: (USE SUPPLEMENTAL A INDICATRE N RTH SYA N DESCRIPTION OF COLLISION:' (USE SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETLIF NECESSARY) 35 -79DOW - v EH . Q w sp e)n nc?P- T7q MC ()p LE 6aSaggj kog 0 C.6rr In QpL,_) _21 I ig t5 1� 69190c, 77Trn c 5jb1V R OF HILL jnz)ICA11fV1,, tS9801;� I I Ron f�)A, U t v n a kL .0 fz) _E: 18 fk)R C71 4!, PTV A VQ 0 - fRjj)- 02 'e> (2 4; KE-5 L,) b U LP_ -r -W]@j)()V�j, _Ve_t4 , r, _T_ JJ�OT (,E C_wcn 9 ;q NAME, ADDRESS INJURIES OF PERSONS INVOLVED OCCUPANTS / WITNESSES (USE SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL NAMES) + CODES 1 - 1 2 1.3 4 - 5 6 SEX I 'AGE �TATLJSJ IN No. Post T I - CkAss I RESTR. EJECT SAFETY, NAME 0 W �2Lt-) NO.NE ADDRESS WA I/ I- yr 0 VA_R I-ffl IN, TU ", LJR REMOVED SCENIEBY. FROM 0 AMB 0 0 HEII 0 PI?IV. '0 NOT NAIC' VRER ❑ TRANSP.. COPTER NAME:.NO. t) 0 PHONE P -7 1 _ 1 -1 - I I - M, I- I bi - _ 20 d ADDRESS 5 C19 L-jt) n NATURE W REMOVED FROM [D POLICE NEU PRI NOT 0 AMB, VE V. SCENE BY: CAR COMER ❑tRANSP. A NAME- PHONE NO. '.1 1 1 1 1 L I I I - I I ADDRESS NASUKtUF INJURIES REMOVED FROM [] AMR. C]POLICE [3HELI. [3PRIV. NOT SCENE BY: CAR x IINVESTIGATINGQFFICE�INAME 8 R�4hK f) 1, m k I, 1:�[ f) fv LBADGE OR I TZENCY K-jD 0* c T , -6 fl I ". !IIATC-EDI rlC�j� L 0 2 " .� 2�11�Rl,)IVED I DATE 2 00 R 101 OF REPORT - _%10 kPPROVED By. DATE STATE OF WASHINGTON �(D-�j 34 �� NTARY POLICE TRAFFIC COL ON REPORT PAGE SUPPLE;: OF G ','i:ti °-s.r'�W.1 _-..nw.YM..waiudui.vrw:.di• . ate,; • � -. �: I QW.",:; CASE NO. SEVERITY OF COLLISION FATALITY INJURY •i 0 PROPERTY DA MAGE ONLY DATE OF MO. DAY ^ YR. COLLISION � o.,. 'a COUNTY _ CITY STREET, ROAD NUMBER R NAME LOCATION �N Ot�O �`]l� e pd"� D �1 i'`'1 . . D Mil wi4t? NAME NAME DRIVERS VS VS (USE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHEN SPACE IS NOT ADEQUATE ON ORIGINAL REPORT OR AS A SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SHEET TO.CORRECT•DRIVER'S NAME; OCCUPANT LOCION OR ANY DATA NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME THUORIGINAL REPORT WAS.COMPLETED.) .. N42lD EN RRI c , \) obvJY\) 019T ORIyJ .251 Q11<%n -T'fZEJE-=�EH, uc; - r of AuEn e)9cK mil-,4T - wfis aW -P) 772)9/LE r�z L- OFF ' Pud Porv,✓ -L )A) 5 0 t'TUL4sc Yh 7D r txc Vt , . flR i 6Tcl)-fl1S,lo3� 0--T••a>DRIYERI�EDESTRIAN�N " _ENFORCEMENT ACTION; .I.,' -t :, Sosin ir' Hpo`p L";o�nNiNc {tLi tt sum :m;;a &��,=,;TW s CIfAT10N � .....:dt:i • .d .�.=yygy,;�2UIjLPAf �L t d i, AI a i• 3 I a i % a DRAW DIAGRAM OF COLLISION SCENE IN REASONABLE PROPORTIONS. PROPERLY IDENTIFY VEHICLES AND HIGHWAYS. SHOW SKID MARKS AND OTHER MEASUREMENTS. . uroiNORTH WITH ANuN ARROW ++ oe All 1 li i INVESTIGATIN OFFICER'S N E AND RANK BADGE NO. AGENCY UNIT/.DIST. DET. �07VY�o- DATE OFREPORT . ®! SP-AR-13 (1.80) 0 . BEET FILE � September 10, 1985 MEMO TO: Art Housler Finance Director FROM: Bobby R. Mills z, Acting Supt. of Public Works SUBJECT: BRUCE AGNEW - 16000-75TH PL. W. ",WATER BILL On Friday, August 30, 1985, the Water Section was called to the above residence regarding a leak. It was.apparent that the Agnew's had a leak on their line, however, when the plumber made the repair, he found another leak at our meter. The Water Section made the necessary repair. Since we had a leak at our meter, I request the Agnew's be charged a minimum bill and a credit be issued for the re- maining amount. If you have any questions, please give me a call. BRM/ml cc: Utility Billing Archie Brena ARCH DT 1.. • HARLAND SLY I I as RJ Ln O -%3 r Ln Lrl ru Ln 0� ❑ r a HARLAND BLB >> °aN i �. wroo �!P Cc:o Z� C nx>m x m . m c- �m��G -1 m D i♦M O ZZ mm�� DO N 41 CD W b 1 a N O O (n (A) Im , n r i r r .D n M. �> N = o0 �m D , O ' w r Rya ma's - r rt N� Ul o 0T - - Ln A c _- � o � N >< Q IN V�SIi �a �e r VA i • STREET FILM CITY OF E®IVION®E DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (206) 771.320, Edmonds, Washington 98020 Administration — 250 • 5th Avenue North _Mr Bruce Agnew 1600.0.--795;t1 P1�Wa1> Edmonds, WA 98020� Dear Mr. Agnew: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Maintenance & Operations — 200 Dayton Street May 10, 1985 SUBJECT: WATER BILL Per our telephone conversation on April 20, it was agreed the problem with the leak was your responsibility. We also agreed that you would pay double the amount owing on your account meaning if the two month consumption amounted to $27.00, you would pay $54.00 until the total bill is paid. If I may be of further assistance, please feel free to give me a call at 771-3202, extension 295. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Acting Supt. of Public Works BRM/ml cc: Utility Billing 4EN -J a o DT ARCH DT �.cv= Ec) MAY 101985 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIR. I TUWAY MESSAGE TI FROM SUBJECT: DATE 4 R rr\ UC-K R�:PoRr s"t)L,) Tara r-)gdvr_, k/4-6 NO 7-lr:l o44 7)+& eum.mfak s/j>& wr� 7 A IJD m -evs Smv cmb oror-r-- 0 mr&Q, Du a- 71 LA40w, s s Rr--&um-srr---b Tx) m r-s. wr wt T-H- etvmsaa mr f,,00 ,4, #7 ro AMP A-1 tz &IIAK -s A MWOO to(O'd PUT-10a ?4dfJS-,V AND T-..4aLlM- G IACA-"noO 'S'l 7WE MC-TrA. E [SIGNED R E p L y DATE: SIGNED CASCADE® L1-C2375 PRINTED IN U.S.A. *A CITY OF EDMONDS-UTILITY BILLING ACCOUNT NUMBER ► 301-07005 302-24600 SERVICE ADDRESS / 16000 75TH PL W MA AGNE1.49LnuiSE QCC' AID MLR ENS OWNER-AGNEW,LOUISE TELEPHONE ► METER SIZE► 3/4 NO. OF UNITS► 1 SEWER CHARGE / 5.96 WATER BASE ► 1 W/13 CONNECTED ► NO q.3 i SUPPLIER ► CODING A W U RINN N/A IA METER NO. ��� LOCATION DATE READ CONS. NOTE DATE READ CONS. NOTE SEi' 1. Jul I mk i =�=�Fmpn�m i� ! _m y �= DATE COMMENTS 7-Zssy Qopl D IfIl, 3r c M rn AM C— rn i2 _0 't rn 0 t= M l2k U r- 0 -< m m M > n rn rn C) rn C. CD Q LA rn t� (A M C= X rn LA rn co Cy *n CD w rn rm rT) -7 I- , 14 1 VN % Ch LA 0 -4 Ac Q A c 'V A , -4 r ZAA v o i 1 1 0 z IN '�' I Itn i ' n 0 p ca ' ;ar- rnQ n i m Me Z ... ..� rn w cn LA m v n O v m p c m z en n, N a rn to 1 V f NI V J Ca T �y11 Z9� d s V,0 qj �i r q r J MvQ � rt�l U r J 1r" > 33. m m rn N rn n v o mA. m C. co� z m r- 3 m n m r3i* .rA, m o v m, 7 " Ln o - C- a m CDvvS Z m cuS z c z N z m rm v n v C2 a o a m v m v m m (AN LA rn Y- i V4 v) n -i 1' m m LArn v m � o , � v o� � G s r r m T� , 7E O O m v (A -1 v m k co O ^ s �_ v m D m m OZ r—D� m 0 ' : m m --I m NNm7ovCD < O u1 m M m m m 'o D0 C D O O C7 m T m Z � w it 1 p� \ m D - w v c v w ?d r m _ w c � v W o z N Z o n n r Z o z z C 0 Z -1Cp Z m y � (� m rl a) 0 w Cl = IV 0l O m lkr O 1 <• C m C G v� C "w ^ Z m v 0 Sri ,V n z° z r n W Z D m Ly E O -0 7C N D , N p m � O O, n 0 m ic z CO) C r W r r A Y, TT FILE CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS — ENGINEERING ACTION REPORT 3091 SUSPENSE DATE: 1�f Date: /� / �� Time: ��'U(�,' File # REQUESTOR: DDRESS., PHONE: REQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE F-1 CONTACT IN OFFICE OTHER: RECEIVED BY: PnilTF Tn- ©m ■ M M■��==i ACTION: E2\11GE LkK.E, !S;T( -L- L.GA KiNN G C()s1i0M6.R All Concerned Notified �^ Action Completed/File PC ���rav»-.+: ?,-�4 t�a^"J6.1P.t�Rj�„dCf. H � .a.''.a. yih,,N'A;. p"�.s'i'u^,p°•�'R''•.G .�,..>e �:r,.� .y„ - f .. ..�+Hr• a`�f� hT— a,.: :.,;;n.;,.n •y mei�.N`�,;d+�,.?.a^,�I.Wr�r ZrM1:-.rr '"�:.�,+�`�J,d'+N�varrRi� ui•v-,�j}w1 ..,.Yi,w"n�i*^ �.ncn+„gee,,.'n.�.rtl+`'�Y'Fx.•:tie�`S�G.�'• .trtr,�+Gr - ctn•r�}':,n'-wv4-.,� LITY OF- EDMONDS ermit No. V COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT; v ' 4 9999 (/ RIGHT-OF-WAY `CONSTRUCTION PER Issue Date ENGINEER1Ivr- A. • Owner: V) SALW V & t-19 - B. • Contractor: l B� Name d Name <& t ap.-,TT LE PA I t>aT- ®L --,7— 1 e� I Cl Mailing Address IMailing Address City State Zip City State Zip Vy e-T (0-7O - -S-zo = ,. FT 11 ,F State License Number Telephone Number "n C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: Type of Work to be Done: I W STP%.L V W Q 010VPJ b) 6 V t it A J Pow , 16' t W 9-1W WOP-TA TO P"P - Gott-WL-�L I MSPIA"y a/ 0 e9680uw� e_0MD. e Toe. P.Nq P�9 D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat 0;�ingle Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y 09,K F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its,d6artrgent5 of Zrmplo§es, including or not limited to the.defense of any legal proceedings including defense -costs, court co .6'' and atto ne fe b reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND'";GCEPTANCE(0O 4+HE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.it • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; PleasecallEngineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion! f z�) • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature:06L Date: " Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY:L �J .a O Time Authorized: Void after �" j days. ua Special Conditions: a=aAIA 72 .6C f GPIi.7! kn& 4deAa U oftl&,s- 741 yam//a/rq d� �./A2.lCbuA�. RELEASED BY: Date O4. v NO WORK TO BEGINA PERMIT FEE: 54 - .42 AZ Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: Fund 111,Fee: Street' Cut Dimensions: INSPECTED BY OR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Date Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION Comments: Diagram: I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 ��� 1476 PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY REV. 7/e7 LOCATION 000 -7STEi PL VJ SO LO AREA POLE NO. SW 1/4 S S T 7?-7 R q- DATE I 1 -4'9f! W.O. NO. 3 7- REASON FOR WORK SVL FOB ENGINEER MA9_T►►J DWG. NO. 09447_6 B Au MV Ll �Q LO►J ST DRAFTER U.G. NO. C"AS _ SCALE 1= Zoo DATE WORK COMPLETED APPROVED DATE PRINTED FOREMAN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ® O NOT EXEMPT EXECMPT SUBSTATION M�ADowOAl�c FEES REQ'D ® YES ❑ NO PARA. 18 CIRCUIT NO. 1i�40 PHASE # 3 PRIMARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV ❑ RESIDENTIAL ADD CKT. FT. PH ❑ COMMERCIAL REM CKT. FT. PH LEO# NET CKT. FT. O.H. U.G. COND. KV SECONDARY OVERHEAD BASIC FEE $ ADD CKT. FT. PH / ®$ / _ $ REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. R P METER/CONY. P E $ PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) 3 PRIMARY UNDERGROUND ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ STATE P O COMMERCIAL ❑ COUNTY BASIC FEE $ LEU # ® CITY c0n0aa9 /®$ /_$ ❑ EASEMENTS SECONDARY UNDERGROUND ❑ REQUIRED ® NOT REQUIRED BASIC FEE $ 4SO /®$ /=$ 190 UNDERGROUND PL AT DATE RELEASED BASIC FEE $ FOREIGN CONTACTS kFT. 0$ /_ $ ❑ GTNW JPN# STREET LIGHTING 0 CATV JPN# t FT. ®$ / _ $ IM JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CATV ❑ JOINT BORE GTNW & CATV WORK IN RIGHT OF WAY ❑ PRIMARY ❑ POLE STENCI ING 0 SECONADARY 90 t FT. ®$ -7!J / = $ FROM TAKE OFF POLE TO _ MISCELLANEOUS FEES VAULT $ PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS EDMouDS PERMIT $ 3CD ❑ TREE TRIM ® PUD LOCATOR 20oA I. S-I _ $ 3 14- N BACKHOE ❑ $ E ONE CALL DATE $ # INDEX POLES PLAT TOTAL DUE $ (014 LOGS U-MAP DATE PAID XFMR C-MAP RECEIPT# - LOCATION MAP PAGE S 3 A - NEW SVCE APPLICATION# _ { I O iNsT 3" S�� R�sER oa rc�iSZ 0%ST9_%GvT,00 Pots TR-�nJC-N t�o0.T%k ttJ Q.( W �i0� To PROPER Zy coRnt�Q_ RvN 14-c 3So DoW.J R�S�sz- N O �TLN ro 3 Bft2 S �L PLO EST'F! `- AS ST1RK� � BO RESTOSZGc e-1Ld TP..�NLF4 ►N G co MPL(--TEfl 3 J d r t_ t` t Q- z S53 x i o � rnLADownavC �D OA P-3�5-Ix P- 1,835 T `'. . .a �_..,�.; ,^ .�F }..1 s ;. ar � .5. ?.,a:.g+�,,�.;y :y.�. r _, ,�5. �;' -, .y !.v �,;'6 •»,h -3v' 4�ri'4+� IF4 `�� .a Z O W a U C4 O u. CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY. SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Company 815 Mercer Street Yea�'le ddress WA 98111 RE Permit No. ! — 3 D.5 C���ED O `, i loaf Issue Date 9 3 _9 I B. • Name Mailing Address City RE-l"T' FlLt* City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16000 75 Place .West Type of Work to be Done: Install New Service D. • Work in Connection With:. ❑ Sub or Plat X9 Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ❑ Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑'Y ® N F. • Size of Cut: X no cuts APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the. City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments for employees, *including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court' costs, and (attorr7ney fees by reason of granting this permit. A HY� A N �. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR W,ORIRNS P D ATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering:. 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. ? . • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be. patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. OF September 13, 1991 Signature: Date: Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work w APPROVED BY: RIN PERMIT FEE: Time Authorized: Void after (��� days. Restoration Fee: Special Conditions: NAr Receipt No.:_ Fund III Fee:_ Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ RELEASED BY:NSA Date}! INSPECTED BY Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE . Lng. Ulv. Maren 1969 FIELD INSPECTION (Fund l I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 A M Washington Natural Gas A Washington Energy Company Addendum to : Submitted by: I b000 -75 P(, vQ M W&- WNG to window Water main del unknown 2. " gas main City of Edmonds Right of Way Permit Application Kerry Walsh Engineering Aide Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 x2761 pager 995-6914 Zydrant 815 Mercer St. (P.O. Box 1869), Seattle, WA 98111 (206) 622-6767 y .`1`..".' 1 "Y y v +wr�pr^tc-wR7c.i .." r •:.��}•,c-,,,•p,n .o �, �i�cJ a� s'„ 7 1- It? C. City of EdmonP RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION.. PERMIT ti . Permit Number. Issue Date: 31- 2 % A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: A. 000 16- B. Type of Work (be specific): E. L o r Anrl ti c 801- E F'D R C. Contractor: . !;'-Jo. Co. pot) `M1 Contact: 80d /C/a KA L EY Mailing Address: Z 1 l S7 # J 11 q Phone: 1,, " p0 — 12 / q { State License #: r5hAy bs wA 9202 L Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑Subdivision (S, City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other ^' INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: Ili F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: ❑ Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ =2 APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN . ..'".'... J INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this applicatidn to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any . kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, thatmay be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR /S RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR APER/OD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOW/NC THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCHIS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE. APPLICANT Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 77I-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature. Date: :7 IZ-6-19 7 or Agent), CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: RW TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER"" DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RIGHT OF WAY FEE: —ti — DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I I I RESTORATION FEE: T OTi RECEIPT NC ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 1 _ ^ �.. t 1. ..f . Y' � � ti• .- ' . � - �, � ., i - � t .. r'. - .. i- �. ' 4f;" c! yl+l+i'�.K? bl— Y 4. x b- - T' L - - r..' z . -ac R W. . �.. �. . mot.. _� . .,,.` a`• 't 1. w n t - S-MISH�COUNTY�PUBLIC UTTLTTY D T. e- :i .»max,.. s.. `:��> �•. ,a . 2n15A`LlFLA-I` ��EAD� w%•QU ��D CK (IZ F0 3�•` .`?.' . • - - � - J� �: Y SpL10E .'AS NL�Etjt:A T' 'D. E A D... t\1 D T AP N S O �- I D t` I Z V I I (c (.P ►l A 5 E` ( ^ 1476 Rev.12/94 ea:OSTALL K1E'J SiNCa_LE HfELIY AAICKOR N(A01OZ) L = 23'(ikS 'g-mkF-IS') LOCATION I( Oc> 7's- Pc L✓ CDMONDS, WA a$OZ(o SoL3-s4 rouri'rY AREA o =tA.S-rALL 2 NEW D0LO G045(G0103jG0103A) FROM Aff POLE To tJEvJ A0ICNOR POLE# 5W1/4 S S T 27 R y DATE (,,12'Vl97 W.O.# 222- e XFR 3 GOYS (6KOA& WEST -ro NEuJ POLE REASON FOR WORK R - LocAT'tn1G POLE OV T ENGINEER KAKA LEY DWG. # 120SS$ • XFR 3 ¢� P9IMAKY To NE►.J Pol_f-- CSPLIcE -ro EAST A5 NEfED�fD) OF ru-,oRr--. SIDEWALK FOR C,-t'Y OF FDMONDSDRAFTER U.G.# e XFR E>CIS'ft*IG TrZPLX To h1Et,J POLE SCALE 'I = :1 o0l DATE WORK COMPLETED FOREMAN APPROVED DATE PRINTED FEES REQUIRED: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ❑ YES 0 NO CO EXEMPT ❑ NOT EXEMPT PARA. 18 ITEM C PRIMARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ COMMERCIAL ADD CKT. FT. PH LEO # REM CKT. FT. PH $ ' _ $ ' NET CKT. FT. SECONDARY OVERHEAD O.H. U.G. COND. KV BASIC FEE $ ADD CKT. FT. PH $ REM CKT. FT. PH NET CKT. FT. METMCONV. PO,L , j$ PERMITS (DATE GRANTED) PRIMARY UND GROUND O RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL I ❑ TREE TRIM BtjS�IC.. $ ❑ STATE El COUNTY LEU # ❑ CITY -�®$ $ EASEMENTS %11 , @ $ ' _ $ SECONDARY UNDERGROUND ❑ REQUIRED ® NOT REQUIRED BASIC FEE $ $ UNDERGROUND PLAT DATE RELEASED BASIC FEE $ , FOREIGN CONTACTS $ _ $ 0 GTNW JPN # 17G 3 -` 9 ® CATV JPN # /%3 e 97 STREET LIGHTING i ❑ JOINT TRENCH GTNW & CAN ❑ JOINT BORE GTNW & CAN WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY ❑ PRIMARY ;�! ❑ . ❑SECONDARY f' POLE STENCILING $. 4' _ $ FROM TO TAKEOFF POLE MISCELLANEOUS FEES 7 r VAULT $ PRE-CONSTR. REQUIREMENTS PERMIT $ ❑ TREE TRIM ❑ PUD LOCATOR %1 $ ❑ BACKHOE ® FLAGGING $ ® ONE CALL DATE TOTAL DUE: $ INDEX POLES PLAT DATE PAID LOGS U-MAP RECEIPT # XFMR C-MAP LOCATION MAP PAGE �%3 5 A - 7 NEW SVC APPLIC. # SUBSTATION -78 - M E.A - 0 w D A LE CIRCUIT NO. IZ - 18gC) PHASE\J/ 3 N gar3 KAKALEY 1n70 -3Z/</ 787- 7SZ3 QQ • 1t�STALL SEC . D1ST. PE.D AT'. SASE. OF KILL,) POLE 1 U 601) e RE— ROu'fE Ey,1S-r,MG SEC. TRIPL.E)C (CORRETJ'FL/ 1►J RISER) tt4-ro • OtST. PED e XFF, SEC, i21SEe, ASSE^SLY FROM. GLD POLE To N-Ew POLf- o Ru N —qs ' 3S-0 kcm -'RPLX DOLON1 RISER To FEET) INTO C>1 S'i' PE0 e RE - tKjS'rALL StL — 1780S oN NEtJ POLE ip4w Location: 27N4E05C Scale 1:100 �- Y ,�•�N(+,` ^R 1. K,%Y: v-ty .��,;� i City of Edmon .# RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION 890 0 191) RRCZIV a PERMIT Permit Number /27 Issue Date: toy COMMUN1TyA. I-Weess or Vicinity of Construction: 16000 - 75 PL W t ; B$ Work (be specific): relocate 2" gas main to clear conflict with soldier pil.e wall C. Contractor, Puget Sound Energy _'Gas Conta&: Joe Jainga Mailing Address: 815 Mercer S t : Phone: 2 0 - 2 State License #: "I- S e a t t 1 e, W A 98109 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): f E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project Q Utility (PUD,'GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family :❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: CIA G.H R I M A nJ F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : Yes UNo U. Size of Cat: 3 x 45 H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times.. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for i aspection purposes. Signature: Date: l (C tractor Agent) . CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK t FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: My w 1'1; 4-L-t RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID -AFTER ASAP DAYS DISRUPTION, FEE/FUND III. . SPECIAL CONDITIONS. " GD„„o�Z-JINfI 7E Ail y' RESTORATION,F.EE: y4" 5?eew A 4- Nlft D WITH PERMIT FEE: NO GH kiRCat CHA'15"64AW GI'ry Or tFomcw0 S TOTAL FEE: COMMENTS: ��+� RECEIPT FEE: ' s .DATE:; ISSUED BY:, 1 NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 • • FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram; (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ■ ,1 1D N 1990 5/6^ 309�.1 { r ` sle ' d' 14 1qp� m 1991 /57 D'7D �© 158 v J 7ST % z � �e•.asa Ld b �991 �S$'j9b• h 199j Sig9 g 9 N N . u 3 0 p� '9+, 3 S 7D 71) cLE,4,2 v �t 4-� aiai,a cO-vFt{�T cvr77� BF Z3G'w f}75 C t �D &'h o ,av p S. Cr Ln P4 1�4� w IN 7" P A-(_ L- . Y N \ � •off 645 Q jkjary "� :s v V / 8 I's9's W dy- 3 u wb a ►-Ir �t d It IV 0 2� . 1 I976's a I • A Al 0 w o Q _ 7429 I 0 j R.O.W. 1 W `- EP -- -- —� s o O O L-o-c o� MON NOT FOUNDEP '4 2 CB 1G---/ 7 L RACP LLA D / RELOCATE SIGN \ ACP D WALKWAY TO BE PLA El) HERE \ 7 TROUGH DRAIN CONC \ R.O.W. 16000 REMOVE EXIST BERM AND BARRICADE AND CONSTRUCT SOLDIER PILE WALL 4.0' FROM PAVEMENT EDGE. PAVE 5' ACP WALKWAY BEHIND WALL WITH ACP TO MATCH TO EXIST D/W AND WALKWAY ELEVATIONS. SEE DETAIL A4 SHEET 2. �p — r'ccD kOFVPP TOBE RELOCATED BY PUD EHILL SLOPE AFTER INS WALKWAY SHALL BE 2: 11 Isa QJ 863 x i ,p 873 2{p � -Sv, T r " 3 _ Q oat ti 4 S7' a a73 P 255 y 3 ` 95� Ito uo a srr 69/ . �f 9p2' ' 8b3 � eS«eT f cl aJ5 /GZ P!_ to ^� Q 1f2 a g43 373 43os 5 863 843 LSS 3C �6, 2 5 All PL /4e4 ST S Sw t373 43 164 ST 8 4b5 37 �591 PL'. F Ibs W 73C t383 Ito 902 010 PL-sw o3v 902 led tY6 w C L L 1 1%/ 1(n00 b 7,5 - 4 G E O T E C HBmt flj�� TRAVEL PREP. TIME JOB N0. CONSULTANTS, INC. TIME ON ,SITE MILES IVAR 19 1992,TIME OF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 166(206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 °F WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT �L '/'.Z__ J B LOCATION /f,/j �' 517% CLIIEEN�T/�OWNER / PERMIT NUMBER NERAL CONTRACTOR GENERA CONTRACTORS SUPT. O T OAY OF WEEK e.C.-Lg-t- �S GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN ` � HRS.CHARGED I , / / i W12BEW 2�WFM- 1 ! A 1. r' I L ._ - Ii WAVA �� r ' ��.._. COPY TO: :SIGNATURE: j r GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. (206) 747-5615 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 DAILY FIELD REPORT TRAVELf PREP. TIME JOB N0. l J TIME ON SITE MILES ^ /f� Y O TIME OFF SITE PAGE pL OF WEATHER VISITORS J B LOCATION AAIAJA,3 CLIENT/OWNER U l- & WAb 0 4 1 Z(-(- G RAL C NTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. um GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN PERMIT NUMBER OAT DAY OF WEEK MRS. CHARGE i I 16 'WA / 1 �. ♦ a FA- Mai - � t� • , A GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION -C�-C._/ O / !X✓ 1�4 Lo G GENERAL CONTRAC /J^u ADING CONTRACTOR I GRADING FOREMAN TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. W TIME ON SITE 1:35 MILES a TIME OFF SITE PAGE J' / OF WEATHER VISITORS Ce/—� 2r CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER 91 -(2 T. DATE DAY OF WEEK HRS. CHARGED w n I . i MA IOWA-- F, ff-'emammws • t l.Il .. • ' %_� _ i • i 'r NEXT SITE VISIT. 1COPY TO: AlOEOrrECH TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. CONSULTANTS INC. l N l � T�gE ON oi6o MILE TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 P : ZO S b / OF (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT C�'"n, JOB LOCATION ZAAA"Vjd CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER GENE L CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS S PT. DATE DAY OF WEEK GRAWNG CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGED IMAM WWI '50�AP WMA ,, .. -' ,L� l►_ ice' �. 17= {. 44 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA M005 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION L (� / t) —�-r Lo 7- /m e* zz�L CONTRACTOR GENERAL 1.1 AALA.1-((..pry GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING TRAVEL/PREP. TIME TIME IN SjTjE TIME OFF SITE WEATHER C U4 CLIENT/OWNER 4bA"Nps I .V—LL. ► *67- 4CTOR'S SUPT. nl -b L, JOB NO.,eq 3 W MILES S^ PAGE j� 1 Of VISITORS PERMIT NUMBER PjT DAY OF WEEK z 1 BLS HRS. CHARGE L Wn� 'r �.. err. -- r i L_ &Iftp ,NEXT SITE VISIT: 4-4 TRAVEL/PREP.TIME JOB NO. OEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 8 300 � TIME ON SITE MILES , y 5r a l~' TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 z 3L7 OF (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT Glow JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNE4 PERMIT NUMBER GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK e\j s lecsAjy 9 z3 ft GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGEO 2,z S y -E d, 01^ s. I -Y ,\ words 5 / to <5�ed �� 4e. cai-c,S� 40'l\a.j 5 P d cur fL„ Uc b be 4� r, g- e S ,' e M cCO (J '�� e-Pt h P.66 S-��4 6,90.5 to m yk e Z'o &01 4,Luz li . e i .S a l d/ Ca GLG c 45 -Z .J— - 7 -.7,jq ^I G /D �i L Q Q_ / 7 i v H f!c / N e s GY is �1 'T i r1 t' / C / Q ' 1-I v✓1 7`� � • /1 S lip �/4 1`' I V r t NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY TO: SIGNATURE: 4 44 GEOTECH TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB NO. CONSULTANTS INC. 300 1 TIME ON SITE MILES TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 00 OF DAILY FIELD REPORT WEATHER VISITORS JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER tudoLA34& e: „-01AdS GENERAL CONTRACT R GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN I IMRS.CHARGED f '014a C o LA4�A "A 0 nAylo t ✓I .-wen / V4 . C N4 ✓CiC�UI LA Sj +� a r l a f lc. r y h- h d erforj4,0 8 � , / / 1 aAj aA VS •t. Y^ art 4- f 1,13 t to rr C r ✓�C7 110 � �/j to / dv/'' �JC I- 11-0 /t .... C:t tt •y.� y Ci ✓1 1 , �') bf 0 n DDA a r S ! ,rt a 4: d le, / C. L.J Gi . q h •� cf ,,,yew a%r NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY T0: SIGNATUr��Z- GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR t',4u M vzuz-Q- GRADING CONTRACTOR TRAVEL1/PREP. TIME +- S TIME ON SITE 12.:tis TIME OFF SITE 41:. L-ts WEATHER CLIENT/OWNER GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. GRADING FOREMAN JOB NO. -A 8 l3o(D MILES sy PAGE L OF VISITOR PERMIT NUMBER DATE DAY OF WEEK HRS. CHARGED !37. S 0 -F Dj b S t, - — x " �c � ,� a. a o -1 . ►1 �► � � Ir4�- �- ��.s- � ► Z o t>str Gk�j %,.J o A --s NEXT SITE VISIT: V 4 COPY TO: SIGNATURE: z GE O T E C H TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB NO. CONSULTANTS, INC. '300 TIME ON SITE MILES (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 . TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 or OF DAILY FIELD REPORT WEATHER VISITORSG1ou.d JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWN R PERMIT NUMBER G ERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CNARGED v� ��tGci Cfl s a b" 01 P P �c ; o ; r,^A-c r 10 L , { s i e Lin qf' le NEXT SITE VISIT: ,�� / •,O � k COPY TO: / SIGNATURE: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 (206) 747-561 S 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION "�o A. 5 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRAC \\e(' GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. 3� TIME ON SITE MILES O TIME OFF SITE PAGE OF WEATHER VISITORS 0 P _�,. cf), A(jkv-.Q CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK a -z 0 HRS.. CHARGED A Z 5' CV\ Ii 11 foc,c T > rr.; t . Y ^i Prl _ y _ _' N _ ,k `y a d• NEXT SITE VISIT: VV COPY TO: SIGNATURE: /r Y 4 44 G E O T E C H TRAVEL/PREP. TIME CONSULTANTS INC. 1 ' TIME ON SITE (206) 747-56I8 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 TIME OFF SITE (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 i% ' o D 1 1 ' 3 a DAILY FIELD REPORT WEATHER JOB LOCATION 5t= Plc�e t3. Neva• V„�dS CLIENT/OWNER . -sf@ ++ GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. t'J M GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN JOB NO. o g �d MILES XZ Ic PAGE OF VISITORS PERMIT NUMBER DATE DAY OF WEEK $Z2 `T -1 Iu �5 HRS. CHARGEO L" O c a io✓1. OLUAA u a erLoa s 'AJ'I 'V,\ s d-o d rCA ' d w Q r eNIJ ., r ; r Ct 9n a u a.. d b b t cl ¢ c) G 4 PA Ab �- 5 ; de �� e Cad ; K. 4 e VN^ s -a 1%4- 1 s e— eCpw i C A eels t S .. k-C O u Ir Vr Q= V. v> S. obi sc,o t°`' 0 0 1 c :9 S:ka P6rd NEXT SITE VISIT: 01 COPY TO: SIGNATURE: • =1 TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. OE O TE C H /.s X-z =1.0 8 3oa CONSULTANTS, INC. y TIME ON SITE MILES TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 10 ' '-� z O O OF DAILY FIELD REPORT WEATHER VISITORS J013 LOCATION -+� CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRSS.. CHARGED 11 1 1 .. u il! i t r ♦ I • • J PC- 11 L I• • / J Tw• r • • • MAWR -NEXT-SITE VISIT: .. . *4 TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. GE O T E C H s CONSULTANTS, INC. .. TIME ON SITE MILES In I TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 jLH5 OF WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION ` CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER .fw Z '�a (-P NA �rr1 4 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGED +t (' + p i� ��,,� tI - ;�• 1 ' a m P ri + cj 1� Oc s r - �.a t f ` f c te h .'% lu I 1Q — - — NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY TO: U SIGNATURE: .f„�. !t O TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB NO. OE T E C H CONSULTANTS INC. + TIME ON SITE MILES (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 3 3 OF DAILY FIELD REPORT WEATHER c� I VISITORS �ecf JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER L 11 11 'T G.doa��s 1Q. pi'T GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK 111 VQ ( 4 tip ri i GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGEO r 4 _ -% O // 1 4 Ic leF �'p Qn + qLC BCD s Si / // - d G2/ rJ -Ake- I GG A dQ 1 LL Lj NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY TO: SIGNATURE: i Aj � GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION 2v f9 GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACT „— µ4 ke r I Al!r-,d GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB NO. r, s TIME MILES �OjN�SIITT\E D (- 50 �O TIME OFF SITE PAGE 0300 J of WEATHER VISITORS G! ea r -- CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK fJ�A' HRS. CHARGED z•a i A _ I III■ �` a • ILI I :COPYOEM r"'. m" TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB NO. CGEOTECH �' S 3p0 CONSULTANTS, INC. TIME ON SITE MILES TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 0 Z /s OF (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT `oL'd JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER eOfl IC4111,0-4111S 6 ' GENERAL CONTRACTOA GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK 8au o4a { Ile,., 10--d 9 za m III, rr,' GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGEO ' ISM.• �_� i -��' -A Y W ILW O I NF 3 z aNN c ., Y , s W a o d a z V W O C Om zwWG O 4V o c o ZO vWS � d0 S orc c AL z iLLi W ~_Nzi KW O Q KW AL W KNS Fa=O uN O `W ' W 6 O = W S 3 0 \ , a u G N z M W, W J W W W zw 1 1 W N W 0 ^ �j a x Lo ` N . J w r v x� z - d ¢ rW_- y z z j o z Q S ILQ N OIL H u W - f.. J O O O = W• V� , W a = J m z O Q ItO F F F 7 W N K N x y W i a_, a U) N a ` w a Ilk > T p ' > 1 7 V • z W W i Ey i v V`' r a �o V� 'S, J y 04v E z3� F- .%. V ►Lill *,J� 1+ z e�n�. �. So a i• a � Z N � w z z a w N TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. GEOTEC H - 8 30� e CONSULTANTS, INC. TIME ON SITE MILES 9 r j~ TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 'L I S� (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 OF WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER d& 51L., GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK e ( e Ed. qZG u r s GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGED 2• v e �t s C o G �. //// F I Q u ck-c-f^,r-Anp( Q,If G/ 0 oit rcL 4 / �Y c NEXT SITE VISIT: / Ga COPY T0: / SIGNATURE: � Q TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. G E O TE C H 89300 CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 TIME ON SITE MILES (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 i ! of WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION Fil'.641 C04- , i5d"10'js Li CLIENT/OWNER Eil,o+-- PERMIT NUMBER G NERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTORS SUPT. DATE I DAY OF WEEK GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGEO - &A e- b51¢ <- �rov 1 r. d rr,'I r� Ih s� a I la-4 ��ris �o Lam,., c� Coc�r�s -� tr h o,ra e_ 6 a� ID 5; da-- c a e_ v�s A,. r our (re.C.O vvA V-14—K de '14 1' o #A 5 • 7'4-� arc. <- 6 /a - b ,f uarr S o-0-5 u w -�w� o� b �� Ctus1.Q c.K ecoY-w.t, d.ec� �O ci ,+�cce1/"r +I\CL`� Qpia 05 o C - o �rct ►^ -d V1 c, NEXT SITE VISIT: Z. COPY T0: �� SIGNATURE: �� 'TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOB N0. 4-4 GEOTECH - ,5 8930� CONSULTANTS, INC. TIME ON SITE MILES � y 'z; o O V TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-5618 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 7 : 3 of / WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER rod i-o4- E 0. o++ GENERAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK &(Arw.u,f-lle.r )5'ql p z'fil u1ed GRADING CONTRACTOR GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGED z •a S ;- -410 eAsprop Wob& SAa 6 o Ja 4-i on . Co 1-s S i �'-` e .e CA i o Sel^ i K 'ILLAf 2 f ra� Q w - S e ca. 1 2 4- v-- e.r -41Av c� r eCQ NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY TO: SIGNATURE: GE O T E C H. TRAVEL/PREP. TIME JOG NO. CONSULTANTS, INC. TIME ON SITE MILES TIME OFF SITE PAGE (206) 747-56I8 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 (206) 343-7959 Bellevue, WA 98005 OF WEATHER VISITORS DAILY FIELD REPORT cleaf JOG LOCATION CLIENT/OWNER PERMIT NUMBER GEN RAL CONTRACTOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SUPT. DATE DAY OF WEEK 1. r 3 ,-r6 GRADING CONTRACTOR I GRADING FOREMAN HRS.CHARGEO r0 OV Gal! I N pn o v � z b mZ10342 slab, 8 of r Sctq64 LZ .2.480, :21LAftlrfj s c 4 o NEXT SITE VISIT: COPY TO. SIGNATURE: y . GEOTECH CONSULTANTS , 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 AUG r3 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 PERMIT COUNTER (206) 343-7959 August 29, 1990 JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott c/o Robert E. Young & Associates 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 Subject: Geotechnical Review and Declaration Proposed Single Family Residence Lot on Northwest Corner of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. and Mrs. Elliott: In accordance with the request of Robert Young, Geotech Consultants Inc. has reviewed the geotechnical aspects of the plans prepared for the proposed single-family dwelling to be constructed on the lot northwest of the intersection of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West in Edmonds, Washington. The plans we reviewed were provided by Robert Young and Associates and consisted of Architectural Sheets Al through A10 which were undated; Sheets S1 through S8 dated July 27, 1990 prepared by MBF Inc.; and two sheets of grading and drainage plans prepared by Group Four dated .August 10, 1990. Based upon our review, it is our opinion that the proposed development, once. completed, will not increase the risk of earth movement beyond that which the neighbors assume. How- ever, there are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. The owner must assume these risks when choosing to build and live in a documented landslide such as is the case in the Meadowdale area. Construction can be more difficult as the subsurface is more of a heterogeneous mixture of soils that can vary widely within a small distance. The recommendations and opinions that we have expressed in our report and in this letter are professional opinions. No warranty is expressed or implied. our approach throughout this study has been to.develop geotechnical solutions which will not increase the risk of instability either to the or to neiahborina nronerties. r Paul and Linda Elliott August 29, 1990 JN 89300 Page 2 Geotech Consultants Inc. should be on the site intermittently throughout the excavation and foundation construction process. This will allow us to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. The contractor should be prepared throughout construction to cover slopes with plastic or to backfill the excavation as necessary if localized instability does occur. Providing the above recommendations are adopted, the following Declaration Statement is valid: It is our opinion that the plans and specifications generally conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical study. The risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties will not increase due to this development, subject to the conditions stated in the report and follow-up letters. if there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, -please contact us. MKD:JRF:cka 1Q^ f�OF WAsh��•. ✓ S n •sA�.•,�,�'ISTEi��O r �� a 610#AI ENy��: Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark K. Dodds Senior Engineer 4Aames R. inley Jr., P.E. OEOrrECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 BUILDING LIAR 17 1992 City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Sharon Nolan Subject: Final Construction Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of Edmonds, Washington Dear Ms. Nolan: March 13, 1992 Report Meadowdale Beach Plat JN 89300 In accordance with City Ordinance No. 2661, Section llc., we are presenting this Final Construction Report for the above referenced project. We are also attaching copies of all the field reports written during our construction monitoring. It is our professional opinion that, based on our site observations and testing during construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in our Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated August 30, 1989, and all other geotechnical requirements made by this firm. If you have any questions or please contact us. 911P"�nNAI. EXPIRES g / 17 / 93 w] Attachments require further information, Respectfully submitted, cc: Robert E. Young & Associates GEO�TECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Burton R. Holt, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer James R. Finley, Jr., P.E. Principal ROSERT E. YOUNG ASSOCIATES architecture and planning 1110 north 175th street (206) 542-3192 seatt►e, washington 98133 363-6512., June 19, 1991 Building Official City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Ave., N. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Re: Geotechnical review of resubmittal of comments by Landau Assoc. of proposed Paul Elliott residence dated May 16, 1991 The following are responses to the above mentioned review. See also enclosed letter from Geotech Consultants dated May 28, 1991. Pursuant to Landau recommendations, Geotech has responded to Items 1 and 3 in their letter. Item #2 - See added drains on revised finished grading and storm drainage plan, Sht. #2 of 3, dated June 4, 1991. We hope these responses will satisfy Landau's concerns. Sincerely, ROBERT E. YOUNG REY : s j encl. Geotech Letter Finished Grading and Storm Drainage Plan - 2 copies GEOTECH corrsur.TarrTs 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 i " T cnn- ? May 28, 1991 JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott c/o Robert E. Young & Associates 1110 North 175.th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 subject: Geotechnical Response Resubmittal Review Comments Proposed Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of Meadowdale Beach Plat Edmonds, Washington Gentlemen: in accordance with the request of your architect, this letter presents our reponse. to the review comments by Landau Associates in their May 16, 1991 letter. Landau Associates suggests that piezometers.be installed on the Elliott property to document groundwater levels. This reasoning is flawed for at least four reasons. First, Landau Associates indicated in a previous comment, that they accept that the slide boundary is not in this property. Secondly,- we agree with Landau Associates that there is very little documentation on lot -by -lot groundwater conditions. Neither Roger Lowen or GeoEngineers did a groundwater level study for each lot in the Meadowdale area, nor the Elliott lot in particular. Therefore, we doubt there is adequate background data with which to compare present groundwater levels. Without this necessary background data, the instal latt on and measuring of.piezometers on the Elliott lot is not meaningful. Secondly, our August 30, 1989 report indicates that our test boring and test pits did encounter groundwater, and also makes it clear that surface, and subsurface water drainage and control is of paramount importance on this site. It is our.opinion that after the installation of the drainage facilities as proposed by the design engineers, the site will be more stable than it currently is. But, our report goes further and points out. that during construction we may require additional drains, if encountered subsurface conditions warrant such action. Lastly, the installation of piezometers is expensive, especially since the purpose of the piezometer would just be t,o verify the already observed groundwater levels. RECEIVED MAY 2 9 isgi Robert E. Young & Assoc. Paul and Linda Elliott May 28, 1991 JN 89300 Page 2 While we may appreciate Landau Associates' suggestion that a schedule of construction monitoring services be provided for our firm, the development of such a schedule implies that the project will start on a certain date, and proceed at the assumed rate. Construction projects rarely proceed precisely on.schedule, so the development of a construction monitoring schedule is not important. Rather, both the design profes- sionals and the construction superintendant will need to understand what our firm needs to"observe, and then this will dictate our schedule. Our. observations would include the excavation and foundation construction, and subsurface drainage. We are confident that the lead design professional is cognizant of those items which our firm needs to observe during construction. If there are any questions, service, please contact us. MKD:JRF:cka or if we can be of further Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. James R. Finley Jr., P.E. Principal 'GEOTECH corrsua.TANTs 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott c/o Robert E. Young & Associates 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Responses Proposed Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of the Meadowdale Beach Plat Edmonds, Washington Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Review Proposed Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach (Corner of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West) Meadowdale Area Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. and Mrs. Elliott: In accordance with Robert Young's request, this letter discusses the items raised by Landau Associates, Inc. in their preliminary review letter. Many of the issues brought out in their letter have been discussed during the application process for other projects in the Meadowdale area. The following are our comments regarding their review, and our review of the revised plans is incorporated: 1. We are very aware of City Ordinance No. 2661 which requires a geotechnical declaration that provides an evaluation and sets forth the statistical probability of earth movement during a 25-year period. As far as we know, there is no practical, accepted methodology by which a statistical evaluation of probable earth movement can be made. With the absence of this accepted methodology, it has been the approach of Geotech Consultants Inc., to prepare our recommendations so that the risk of instability both during and after construction stays at the background level previously calculated by others. . -. Paul and Linda Elliott November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Page 2 2. Landau Associates takes exception to our statement that the proposed Elliot residence, if developed according to our recommendations, is no more at risk from landslide than neighboring properties. They quote a 1.955-56 study by Dames & Moore, and present a map with a scale of one inch to four hundred feet showing approximate slide boundaries. Geotech Consultants Inc. has conducted studies for the two lots immediately to the north of the Elliott property: The slide boundary wa.s observed, and appears to terminate on the northern third of the lot to the north of the Elliott lot. Therefore, it is our opinion that the risk of landslide on the Elliott property is no greater than the neighboring properties. 3. Landau Associates states that the groundwater conditions of the site have not been well documented, and that groundwater conditions actually may be very near the ground surface. This is actually a restatement of a concern on page 3 of our original report. The report recommends numerous surface and subsurface water control methods which have been adopted in the plans. In addition, our field representative may recommend additional measures should they become necessary during construction, and we have recommended the project be constructed during the dry summer months. It is our opinion that these measures will be sufficient to control local surface water and groundwater. The statement by Landau Associates that where groundwater is still at or very near the ground surface, it is probable that the risk of movement is still as high as it was prior to the city improvements, is not correct. Such a statement assumes that groundwater is near the surface at some time during the year and at that time, instability is imminent. There, has been no documentation of this property sliding within at least the last 30 years. An abandoned home was still situated on the lot the last time we were on the site. Presumably, the property has been previously occupied, therefore, we can assume that problems would have been reported. 4. Landau Associates comments that the design professionals should evaluate a pile foundation for the structure. A piled foundation was evaluated, and no significant increase in safety was found in piling the structure. A mat foundation could tolerate some movement of the property. If there is a massive event, both the mat and pile foundations could fail. Paul and Linda Elliott November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Page 3 5. We would recommend opening up only limited segments of the property at a time to minimize the amount of exposed excavation should this technique be warranted during construction. 6. We understand the garage foundation does incorporate a mat foundation as recommended in our report. 7. Geotech Consultants Inc. assisted with the preparation of the environment -al checkl i st. 8. We recommend that Section A, Typical Trench detail show a variable depth since this trench may need to be deepened significantly below the footing level. In addition, the arrow regarding the comment "Washed Rock with Non -woven Geotextile Fabric" should be properly placed. There -are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. The owner must assume these risks when choosing to build and live in a documented landslide area such as the Meadowdale area. Construction can be more difficult as the subsurface typically -is more of a heterogeneous mixture of soils. Surface and groundwater control is required both during and after construction. Our approach throughout this study has been to develop geotechnical solutions which will not increase the risk of instability either to the subject property, or to neighboring properties. The recommendations and opinions that we have expressed in our reports and letters are professional opinions. No warranty is expressed or implied. Representatives of Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be on the site periodically throughout the excavation and foundation construction process. This will allow us to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our explorations, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities. comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. The contractor should be prepared throughout construction to cover slopes with plastic or to backfill or shore the excavation as necessary if localized instability does occur. Paul and Linda Elliott November 15, 1990 If there are any questions, service, please contact us. MKD:JRF:cka •F,S R F/iy°° e Qk • 1 ff �� Ashy' •. ✓ � `yam • $• s % "Vf •••N.•.;�S� I 0 JN 89300 Page 4 or if we can be of further Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. /� Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer )/ames R. FinlCy Jr., P.E. Principal r GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott c/o Robert E. Young & Associates 1110 North 175th Street Seattle, Washington 98133 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Responses Proposed Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of the Meadowdale Beach Plat Edmonds, Washington Reference: Preliminary Geotechnical Review Proposed Elliott Residence Lot 11, Block 29 of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach (Corner of Meadowdale Road and 75th Place West) Meadowdale Area Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. and Mrs. Elliott: In accordance with Robert Young's request, this letter discusses the items raised by Landau Associates, Inc. in their preliminary review letter. Many of the issues brought out in their letter have been discussed during the application process for other projects'in the Meadowdale area. The following are our comments regarding their review, and our review of the revised plans is incorporated: 1. We are very aware of City Ordinance No. 2661 which requires a geotechnical declaration that provides an evaluation and sets forth the statistical probability of earth movement during a 25-year period. As far as we know, there is no practical, accepted methodology by which a statistical evaluation of probable earth`movement can be made. With the absence of this accepted methodology, it has been the approach of Geotech Consultants Inc. to prepare our recommendations so that the risk of instability both during and after construction stays at the background level previously calculated by others. r JN 89300 Paul and Linda Elliott Page 2 November 15, 19.90 statement 2. Landau Associates takes eresidence, ifion to developed that._ the proposed Elli according to our recommendations, is no more at riroa landslide than neighboring properties. They quote with a Dames & Moore, and present a mapwith 1955-56 study by , hundred feet scale of ch to four Geotech consultants Inc.. approximate slide boundaries. the has conducted studies for tht two Thesslidedboundaryo was north of the Elliott property. observed, and appears to terminate on the northern for lot- the of the. 1 ot. to the north of the ri skl of landslide heonfo . opinion the neighboring it is our op rester than the neig g Elliott property is no g properties. Associates states that the groundwater 3. Landau conditions of the site have al actually maybeove(rn very near the that groundwater conditions a of our or, report. The report ground surface. This is actually a restatement o concern on page 3 In ol recommends numerous s'urfeene and subsuinactheatplans. in methods which have b recommen addition, our field representative may necessary during additional measures should they ro ect be construction, and we have summememonthsnded he project ]is our constructed during the dryol opinion that these measare�oundwateer. Theestatementtrby local surface water an g roundwater is still at or Landau Associates that where g pr._ - b� that the very near the ground surface, it is o risk of movement is still as high as it was prior to the city improvements, is not correct. Such a statement y is assumes that groundwaterisnthatthtime�,fainstabilityt some t�ms during the year and imminent. There .has been no documentation of this ars. An property sliding within at letuatedst theonast 3 thelotyethe last abandoned home was stillpropertyhas time we were -on the site. Presumably.Wetcanass assume that been previously occupied, thhereeffore,, problems would have been rep Landau Associates comments that the design 4. i pile foundation for the professionals shd evaluate was evaluated, and no structure. A piledfound ing the significant increase in afeon y wasould tolerate nsomel movement structure. A mat foundst of the property. If there is a massive event, both the mat and pile foundations could fail. W Paul and Linda Elliott November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Page 3 5. We would recommend opening up only limited segments of the property at a time to minimize the amount of exposed excavation should this technique be warranted during construction. 6. We understand the garage foundation does incorporate a mat foundation as recommended in our report. . 7. Geotech Consultants Inc. assisted with the preparation of the environmental checklist. 8. We recommend that Section A, Typical Trench detail show a variable depth since this trench may need to be deepened significantly below the footing level. In addition, the arrow regarding the comment "Washed Rock with Non -woven Geotextile Fabric" should be properly placed. There are always risks associated with construction in a known landslide area. The owner must assume these risks when choosing to build and live in a documented landslide area such as the Meadowdale area. Construction can be more difficult as the subsurface typically is more of a heterogeneous mixture of soils. Surface and groundwater control is required both during and after construction. Our approach throughout this study has been to develop geotechnical solutions which will not increase the risk of instability either to the subject property, or to neighboring properties. The recommendations and opinions that we have expressed in our reports and letters are professional opinions. No warranty is expressed or implied: Representatives of Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be on the site periodically throughout the excavation and foundation construction process. This will allow us to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our explorations, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of. contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. The contractor should be prepared throughout construction to cover slopes with plastic or to backfill or shore the excavation as necessary if localized instability does occur. Paul and Linda Elliott November 15, 1990 JN 89300 Page 4 If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. •'�����`•�� Respectfully submitted, Mks RF�NlF ••� GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. � r � oF WAsy�s�,ti f �°e .1-4 • >`' M �' • Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer �O O • % iNetS.lt'CTE r �{`�Q`t � J • )me s y R. F�nIC Jr. P.E. SAL EN y •..%%%%.- Principal MKD:JRF:cka I J I APPROX. 5' OF PREVIOUS FILL TO BE REMOVED, & 3 REPLACED WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL BACKFILL. 4 I B-1 .......... ............. -FALL �IcA0 I KIS �7cCrrl QG DP -A I FJ A'�b e�HOWKI T` S Poop, TO C-01-J6-FkL)CMC4,J -nEs we X —:�7i u ACrIVI IYEM Flo eARj LLr t�)A-rLIQHT x e -nL OTHER CUTOFF�SWALE Lx -rP LML-ITIE:3 AF!,F- C-OQ,3 A TP-1 • APPROX. 18" OF PREVIOUS FILL TO'BE RRU�CTURA CDEROSION CONTROL & GRADING NOTE WITHSBACKFILL T 1. Approval- of this temporary sedimentation control plan E-ZV5TI, KIG does not constitute in approval of desi,in, size, nor POF-AfaY A( location of pipes, restrictors, channels, or retention EF-��3HEET OF Z R02. facilities;, but if; an approval of the temporary erosion sedimentation control plan only. The siltation cont- rol P; CUTOFF' e)H PC rZARY systems depicted on this drawing are such as to meet IAJAL-F- minimum County requirements. As construction progresses and expected (seasonal) conditions dictate, more siltation control facilities may be required to insure complete siltation control on the proposed plat. Therefore, during the course of construction it shall be the obligation and responsibility of the develop -or J to address any nw ....... econditions that may be created b y . . .. .. .. . . ....... his activities and to provide additional flicilities Z/ over-- and above minimum requirements, as may be needed t.- . . ....... . ........ to protect adjacent properties. z` 5HEP To 2. Provide and maintai -n temporary sedimentation collection f -itiOS to insure sediment laden -n water does not enter the natural drainage system. These facilities must be in operation prior to clearing and buildingTO 2 % % construction, and satisfactorily maintained until construction and landscaping are completed and potential for on -site erosion has passed. t 3. Temporary erosion !7,edimontation control. fz,.ci1ities --;hall SCALE: 1/8" 1' X. DATUM: CITY OF EDMONDS be constructed by placing siltation control filters around swales (natural or manmade) and shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition until such time Z J, that land clearing and/or construction of permanent drainage facilities are completed, operational, and then returned to original ground conditions. Temporary .. ... ...... siltation control filters shall be approved filter 1\ fabrics 21 tall. 0 IOLA J APPROX. 30" OF A MOTIF: 4. Berms and swales shall be constructed as necessary to AVaUT O'P D MIK TO BE REMOVE I L I Tk-t' AND -LI M direct all sediment laden water to 5TA-13 natural vegetation EYCA\JA-T10Q UJ WEATHER for silt control. Discharge from cutoff WITH STRUCTU swales shall > be directed to disperse into native vegetation on -site. 2 areas UJ 5. Vegetation shall be established oil disturbed Or Oil areas of construction as necessary to minimize U erosion. Areas to be rough graded with f inished grading to AVRIC follow near project completion are to be seeded with 0! 1111HE MESH --- --- Of? EQUAL. al, Perennial or Hybrid Rye Grass. This also AnnLu POST dikes and the sediment basi 11 3/-" 'NASHFI) includes perimeter ROCK embankment. Ilydroseed preferred. X. p -k 0 F- 6. Stockpiles are to be located ill safe areas and -D OVE adequately protected by temporary seeding and mulching. TER F'.41RIC', Hydroseed preferred. P '�ECS FCA APPR(A.-.t Cr .11;y oljj;n f �1 x '_. , r - \ • '_.\ J # 3 2. -T:1—I1 FILTER FAEIIII: To 013 JI _ i I 7. Immediately following finish gradi n%f, permanent 12 vegetation (consisti ng of rapid, persistent 11-id legume) ?1�9 FR ER F-BrIC T 11 11�1 71) 11 include: 141�,.CU-�S :,E To [,.f- SECT J0:1 will be applied (inin. 80 lb/ac) This is to %1TI4 SUITAHLE: flU. 0' al, Perennial. or Hybrid P 6 Annual, Per ye Grass; - `NO G % Creeping Red Fescue F I 40'. White. Clover I- T F R FABRIC ATTACH W1 Hydroseed preferred. rAPLES OR VNIF RINGS 1 -1 GA V/ IQ E QP 0 0 8. Prellact L 01 _�yt.ion of surface: All areas to be seeded shall be -lt ed to the satisfaction of the engineer. This PA M cultiv, may be accomplished by discing, raking, lilrro,,.!ing 01- 3 other acceptable means. >11 Fertilizer: "11,111 be applied at iool: per acre of 10- P 20-20 (10 pounds per 1-100 square feet) or equivalent. i C �, 6" MIN J II Iq ' I J S NA L f I LOY; L IN[� BURY [�xTCM ADDITIONAL COTES OF FABRIC o C rf,,Ftxii E C T 10 N TY CI-1FmkDAM -111 Comply With Chapter 70 of 1. All excavation and grading s1l, the Uniform Building cocie, 1988 edition. TO' ff SWA'-E C FILTER FENCE DETAIL Z. The Applicant ,;hall SlIbIllit I trll(-}-, route plan to the City 0 I E F t-OW NO SCALE - a Fwj9T-Ejc;r i kl-rAK-E�- -!t;E Engineer for approval prior to remo., I of any excavated material, 011-H P(L-TF-P, r-A0V-1 J- ACCEPTAKE ;T(Q MTLIN 02 smeAkl B4�F-s 115 MATERIAL 3. T il e Applicant !� 11�1 1. 1 he for }:eepil all tr t clean and fref-2 of del)riF at. all tillies. L! I MAX KEY ROCK HITO WOM APPROVED AS NOTED 4 4. All grading wort: :hall he clone during normal wor—.ng hours of "UMP TO BE INSF:CFED D,1iL.Y the (7;.ty of Edmonds, 8:00 am to 5:00 pill Monday through Friday. CLEAN Vf'HEN DEIRIS EXCEEDS 7// ROCK TQ BE 4" �,11,'qUS 1/2 DEPT)i 21191 S.'File Applicant shall QUARRY SPALLS PER I)c responsible for providing verification V,SDOT STD 9-13.1 of the total amount of excavated material prior to finalizing the grading permit. Verification shall he by letter from a licensed U-r AOP** 21a10VE • k6P�4A L-T - civil engineer stating that he or she has inf;pectecl the site and 93,/ that the grading conforris to Chapter 70 of is's 11 FVC. BAjri:�Fl U- W111,111A the Uniform Building MEADOWDALE ceuL,-OEP,eocl� -rt-) �Gkw)E. TYPICAL CHECK DAM Code, 1988 edition. CAP t E-�J KIEW 5TORH NO SCALE BEACH 6- T f dpeiiwd ne c-n!;s, a ry by the (�i ty, 1: he App 1. ic�ui t TF-�l 1�5 CF6RATIG -C-)7 CH I"V= F1 -PFZAT1j SYS !;hall provide �JAL Go: I 13AT7F-V- PARK trafl i,: con L I ()I (1111-3.11�j 1'1 tho (11.1ding lllat-eri;Ll. NOTE: 7. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE A RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WHICH IS SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR MIDI. MADE A PART OF THE DESIGN DOCUMENTS. % -Ti.4ic-K-HEee� cr ui OFFSITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. >< 4'-22' QUAF<KY B. THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 8,582 SF = 47% SITE SITE THE TOTAL LOT AREA IS 18,465 SF t 100% SITE. 0 4 !wvq 4 , TON 160TH ST SW X LAEBUG 9. ALL TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. WHARF b. I> V) FAR F.- F1 FE Z% Sr R N1 %5 READ 6,11 j _ = 1 _ J,t r`, P^AA L �H . ......... EARTHWORK OUANTII-IES: 1'15" MIN DEPTH CUT 1360 CY ....... ROCKEFI-Y DETAIL . ..... 'L.OPE C, 5% MIN . ...... (INCLUDES STRIPPING PER GE07ECM 10% MA X N.T.S. REPORT) FILL 915 CY TEMPORARY SWALE SECTION NO SCALE 7 164TH ST SW Cn 164TH ST SW X_ UJ 3: MEADOWDAL#r FIL PIAYFIEIDS >< PMW/11-61C co MEADO\'4D4t,, [D (D r- BEACH RD 168TH ST SW VICINITY MAP APV! lv NO SCALE SHEET TITLE: ROUGH GRADING AND TESCP J 0 13 NO,. DATE: 10/10/90 DRAWN BY: CLG REVISED: JAN 1 6 1991 1 OF 3 'i-&-eral in LZ Ti v IR -InR;U 29-3033 83926 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... SEC. 5, TWP. 27N., RGE. 4E., WX COO 4 9 -110P, 57.0 I kJV ER-T5 6:4-: CL-C-AKJOUTS AP-,F- POR co #6 IQFC:)F-"A-nc-)Q OKJL-( AND MAY 12SQUI er,- PEFEAJF-)IkJe, co!5)4, 10 rop= 5-7. 0 c;tj r- I Eln 2cQn-no"e, FCk-,7,rr I kJG -rop 56.5 1 kJ V 54 G CO #4DEPi-N ETC. op=41-0 Top = 49.6 -142.0 (41X±� I Qv = -0 VARIES SEE PLAID . EJI-ISTIQCq nWA'Pff- V5, NATIVE kALL, FLAa-r- VAP..! Es co M PA GTED ToI %% 5 ti N I m F?:;) CITED 56c-I ALi f 915% HAX. C�F-Ar ur-uemy. TOP cr- LA02iE-jZ- W C, 0 Z COAT5 WALL CSEALERA FVA f-[0qH-jLI-UF- D8 -noLl /1\ 1,ASHEP 13cc< WITH Qc�J-IJOVE� -Fic-AL- -rF�!Eujcj� SLAB EL. 57.00 F::01- 11GH-1-L1 UF AKJD FEe-FOeAI-T-P W'ei-rAU-, VAFMI GECTEKrIL-E FILTER FABFIC uq; R�:ZTT-MG t�r,>-AIIJ. > SLAB EL. 57.00 �eIO10 M I M. PEPT-H A5FF cowco To 5. a R�L)1!Jkja SLA5► IKIV=52-0(S'D r' SIZE or--S FERP.- PVC. --f-E R-ArJ Foe I LIV 3G, B(4--y-f- ) P Pl iN1v*F--z-r SHAL L C-1 5E AS LokI A,-=, Fbo-n 06 Avj b/01;E! CLA W L, 5PAO-E. 5LOFF-MD L�,P-41Q. R-Af-E kjE�EPPbLJES F-701-JN!k4AP-P. eno VG 40 Pvc- -nGPT-ukie-. DEPT-H r-o p -11. a VAP-IE-t-5l, SEE.FLAKI. u v 3ra. E5 (,4 ilLJV 43,0 CAP i. p, WV= -J5,5 4/ SECTION A TYPICAL TRENCHAltillkje,-r,6\LL- Cc, Tole-,K SEE PLA-rF- 7- 6Eoi-v,-,H NO SCALE c; P 714IUVjw /, �� F:6z EI-Al I qvz D Cod -�L-, Frame and Grate 1)er 0)( CAP SIDES 0 Standard Specifications 'SLAB EL. 45.00 z CLMA�JOL) I Qv c0:wI r0F, S& 5 SCALE: 1/8" 1' �< 30 DATUM: CITY OF EDMONDS ...... SLAB EL. 48.66 6" RISER SECTION < A Weight 290 lbs. -roPz 5&,-7. kiv=!�e 0 lirh Grade HAximum K SLAB EL. 42.00 ....... _[2' 62 .1p 161, P', cap 0 0 LL 12" RISER SECTION 0 3�.&P(4,) Weight 520 lbs. IV Wit- I I -v- fibP=52-5 r C/ +CO z qq <>.6 PRECAST BASE SECTION Lu 2F :7 Weight 2,000 lbs. E47- T�- 4-41 PF- IZ 0 c K F- Iz., C, z C) for pipe entry LLJ 0 4 way 20" knockouts prQyided -F1 G H -rL-1 U E For-KERY z R E 0 �� I / /. ro P�=. RM DRAIN CLEANOUT z 4 7 0 STO A," Pr:::RF= Q OUTFAL-L- NO SCALE D c- ja ;W 4- TYPE I CATCH BASIN NO SCALE Q 0- v IIQV-=57-0 x zzS -0, C EKJP 0 ,gv F-jz' Aw P 0 AOArJ 0 C/ 0 d� NOTE: SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR OFFSITE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS EX. 55 1-1 H WV=- F1 F-L.L? Cg C45 4f-4 VE21 r::-r (6) -rop= 55 WOTE: I. USE PLEW-1131-.- C00WEC,-rI0Q5 50 r-_-11,11 AT FL)ILIT OF ajTRY. WFE COWPAC 0P- TD `31AKE � VEZ FY Cj sLcFc�; i' 6 ImA a-F-\/A-nckj-,s CnE. GIvEU -IF-{ESE - S, j ACCEPI,AoLt: IIGHTJ EYIS-ri G GEAP) FeOMSED neAj�)E: Sch 40 DR 35 (Am,, bhtti .59 9 50/- NW• PRY PE&J9 I T-r Cc-, c- b -1EAvF Ir-, wi -r -Q1 E 06; 1 K E-E-R. Li Lr) N 75 we, 4E MATERIAL fED AS NOTED -Ce� -)// 21q 55 50 P-\u AND CLEAN AN5 Mr-EX"'t-D ALL Pk I U u E-S) cATcH e0\6>IQs Akur,> FL-L4-00-rs To1+50 1+00 0+50 0+00 rf� OF- sad F— TREJUN P SE WAY'PROFILE DRIV111" SCAL:-: 20' H, 11" = 5' V 111" 1 wmln� n fll"T7-1-�—!lf-r e 1, :,,,1,.17 e�, ff r,*T, 7 _Z1. �=—NM .1- •--M", r—r, S%m 7—, C\j C\j Lo (D LO '0 "A H ri k cn Lu LO < EF 0 LLI Z 0 < Lij A, L 7LE. SHEET FINISHED GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE PLAN JOB NO.: ,.[?A-TE: 10/10/90 ;-PRAWN BY: CLG E V I S E 0 4 19m 2 OF 3 125628 r m 0 col SIP P� -----_ - nE R>✓Tc.iui�1� � _ � v �G� U I *4 ki o P 3 = I nl V = 39 . 1 1 SCALE: 1" = 20' Iv W H Q O Z i y � u t� I ar 13 RR T1E �rz�I� jl►JC, k1eJ 1. --I Cvt N 1 �41 fzl - _ ... — � ti• �--------- ,... ®a®d�, is -z-4c, ; I aQ A�Q� �p��?D��G� a aGOD S. RLINGTON Du'i'•FAL-I°— �VIIII q�qQ�J �Q\QAc NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANYRf kJiTH Z LF8FVC RA-r MV=W. o �I N' y (� Wn W s cn rrfrP 19, LEGAL D E S C R I P"I""10" N J Lot 11, 1114cl,-. 29, of trio Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recordad in Volume, 5 of Plats, page 33, Records - of Snohomish County, waz;4i Nton TOGETHER with, vacated Seaside Avenue adjoining ing thereto.UR WIZA3 74-, -7 5 OUA AND TOOLTITH that portion of vacuted 75th Avenue WL-st JSUaSide AVenual and Vacdted North Meadowdale Vo4d lying Northerly of and aLutting th4 line 4uucrihad as followu. C0KMENCX14C at the Northeaut corner of Lot 11, AlocY 29, in the Plat of Meadowdale U*4ch, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, ..................... �cecrrd-,,; of Snchozton; thence 148800914.311i4h County, Washin p4gaW islo.ig . . 9, thu North 1"nu-7f -taid lot, and thb W4sturly prolongation thereof, 4 d;stance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin or ' vacatud .S64SI46 A'venoa 4t a point on the arc of a curve from which the �enter lius 1478*2312811W (description N77*231200W) 5258.8 faut dlistant,* tntnca -Sout)iirly along said curve and Aargin ,to the right t I- , -"1) %111) qt' ugh 4 centr4il 4riqla of 1131,321, an arc distances of 140.02 fai�t (Y) V) to tho P0114T OF -U1;G1JJr1114G of uaid, linu; 54.48 r, th4nC4 508*0914311& thUncQ 1462*01'00"E 14'.5-01 feet to the teriainua of said line ,4t o,paint an the cf,nzarlino of 't-4id Vorth Maadow441a' Road lying 3O.00 foot Wu4terly as ra4a:�t;red� at right angies from the coniorl,in,4, of 7!;th Place Vk:ut; thence IT 1:auturly Along the Meadowdale Aoaci to tr4 cf� said forthe right of way of 75th-Pl4cu Wust. 571 Q) 7 f AL- - --------- X" I '\VAV, \'Y' -A kit k, will? 1 6 -� r N 14 eel 15� 06 d, -- --------- 4A 47 U1 r 4nk N I 'A 'Ile 120v I r) e-, redv 0 1 :4- N TO 110, Q� n. (N tA vo tr? + Mote V(PI,5-71rlo I N Z44 PIP, t P�l to 71 4. . Ir 6 IT11A hpTH 6.t.,r Q &Mpf MAI n7-36 4-: 557,34 A\/6 6P-Wr-, 53-34 +- 15' - -74,:34- A,--�AL IT F EL N � -� 6C+4TP-W,-t6P 10 VrT-�41F`1 ALL tA rr-1W1A0H4'7 / 4. -60tL* P-qOP-T JN 615M 12A7YT,-,0 AU67 30 1q411M Sy .7 1 PUe TD SLIPE6 Y A Vr TP- nAI rr--,Ij �4T A2 O�Ml / r-�Atj / Pt,17W I-ZVFL- �t-4, T-f F, *,,-U, C 4 T-:: LR/A-Ill C, Dr -TA 1 0ter A -A t�-P.7> r>r-,�TAIIIA� A wl 0 F- IN \N I 0 i 46 TAY HUMV.,� �ry A-9 tF-- A /1- 151 t:33 44- t F PT 64r-42,blelE ll V, -,p -7-34.,, 7)F Xt5 14,7 I W-, U LATI ON 4, rZ .4- W + + 57 4- (A) (P) 4- 1. 00 M+ i H'T, ;;t-7(!-- - 00 1 AcTiAll- HT -7 5 ,� 5' u- Top. 5 G ,S I Holbr:� 45s�� Rp'j r-rzo-iiw, ZH;' [ Xt, V4 12044= r—PAM I tit 1414ti O-Wr- 741 DP:,P �4 /Z-1c: STREET FIL 14/Adad 7-- A�/v Joe No.: DATE: 7-27-clo DRAWN GY: REVISED: 5-15-9 1 r a 1 � 4 NW 1/4 SW 1/4, SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SEC, _ TWP. RGE, I i �v P� 23 ��• �0 Ab I I / f I � � I I I I II D J Joe, Coo 0 l� I • � 11 i I 1 a / 3 I � I 1 I :% / I // � / o SSE rt. I I I v Ia / a 1k DrP• I / CO I / / I ° A D O 1 I f T{0 / / 5 o 0 ��00 J �, I •'� / dry% / � � / / ,IV ?e ze IV,- 88� 09 143" �'. 4.4 •/ 4 , /r /rb V / A _W l'�'gwWAY LOG4rio Tp 3E VACATED � � / I �D ---- �p ./ r � r � 7a SUBJECT SITE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE o WA c KWA y C5M T AP y • k {2 / 5h a3 t�)� / Gb 60 62 � t4 , q, 1 1D� / • 1D 00 J I ivo 1 .10, •. a I I � 1 ' 3 I �• /' I TO BE CONVEYED TD r-ITY OF EDNI MDS / 1143RD 573 s 3 N pP� t43ftD3 3 ST ,ten StV 2 a I.aTH P SW * 1 144TH ST SWPt SW r I 4 ZaS ^i i esr`1"ST I I!!u"••Srn a sw 3, stv PUGET A; A� /� p�-/� T $w 46TH PL SW _ >' SW �MA U��t1.1 is6TH 5 t=� .33'- 1vTHSST sw of > PL W e- �M5'Ye w IH -PI SW NDRMA gE:.CH.�.-a t.S7"s�w 14 T a< ST e SW - �/ ,dSTH t<9TH NORMA' -BEACH OUN ! T I FISHERR -46 > E 1dgT 3 PL S':JP SW STDV 14}TH PL S' — <r> ,TTrN, Pl I �i CV SW t . PL SW r� ZSOTH- 7L3 6 U; 1sIrS .SIN I 15CTH e�q N ; 2s 3,suT 1s3 I ==3 ST "� SW . uPL sv I c"�. /52ND� STc 153RD ST 3 a >< s 3 3 <I SUBJECT SITE : z `s R� PL SW 3 SaTH I, > c >g s.TH , L W 1 'L!--«1-6-c=-- 5T 1�; > SLV i �1 7_TH.. .t r "MCAJOIVDAL.%i '. 3 R 3 167TH $7 EA D 0 D $.,v h,. BEACH c: 3 3 U 757TH PL SW ST I o µ I::_. . 758TH ST QI PA_R.r _...'"._SR57TJ PL SW a i t-. �; t TH PL SW , �I r-�15b, PL sw 3.... I �i as ax p o LAE3UGT t 1 l rx 160TH-__- 1-Sr --SW �- +- t=-' :WT19 WHAR �3 �Fqo 116JTH ~ PL $W -._- 1 S 3?. o N O tt i61ST PL SV4 r{PL sw 6IRD ST $ISW I I '• 163RD PL SW �lJ� _3 t6aTH IlSi ! { W 3 Q I 3164TH- 1 ST SLV 1 -1 1 ::•�. < FIR. $yy > I rlii`:::::� . RO ei65TH> Pi sww000 PL I Q BEV RLY l SW 3, P I o ^ `•P ad. rv�'ivs ..:.o r ¢ g ,e7, = pp a <- I" ,H': T �sw' 3 v R a168TH ST 6 SW t re .t-NEADQ II ��» 1 I = P AtEA00 DALE Q -q-5- 16 7, 64Tii7L - t I� 9004J! 9< L__-� a` C Q 1 �' Pt H PL S )S 1'Jaj• c" LATH ,P H'SW 179TH•PL SWI .� i SW r{ �0 171ST - , a_¢ST SW 1 W gnJ.1 ND 172NtD ST p 172h10 < 6 i 3 G•PySWo'.17JHD �C,yS715W,ny e, a . I72Np Sr 172N• P� r N P ST SW m H P 5T .. 9Q #'^e,Jsr a m a P ' { PL SW . 74TH-5w .< ".. y 174�H $Tr PL SW x ; I °,T._ A JIM o l o A� Cg 1st DATUM: CITY OF 44? S.. Fr. 'z� EDMONDS SCALE. 1/8" - 1' / • 6 `� �SOLLARD�'-- � P�1 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION i . h / 1D'4,2103.9, �a�9 Lot 11, Blocl-. 29, of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in ��. Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, IV80- 4 ' 43'" W /\ Washington. TOGETHER with vacated Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. AND TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West 7n (Seaside Avenue) and vacated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly of and abutting the line described as follows; t �N till • 13. 1� l 1 COr24ENCING at the Northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the `ry •1';•_\ / 1a. / ' Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, i ���(, Records of Snohomish County, Washington; thence N88'09143"W along i /0 T .3 r / _� J the North line of said lot, and the Westerly prolongation thereof, /� / a distance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin of vacated q 16Seaside Avenue.. at a point on the arc of a curve from which the center lies N78'23128"W (description N77'23128"W) 5258.8 feet •. / / / 00 distant; thence Southerly along said curve and margin.to the right through a central angle of 1*3113211 an arc distance of 140.02 feet : P�/NN/N / �� • to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence S88'09143"E 54.48 y feet; thence N62'0110011E.145.01 feet to the terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road -lying V 30.00 feet Westerly as measured at right angles from the R•D,I/ -- — centerline of 75th Place West; thence Easterly along .the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road to the right of way of •••.•' i I 75th Place West. : * 1 �' F3oLL11RDy&%t 69 F� N a Y- Ni Ole - h 3.11'- UJ aLu �.. ZI er ^ Q L ° m o W -7 Tt) W I / 3 z 0 AF No. 7906190310 LOT AREA - 189544 SO. FT. LEGEND ® TEMPORARY BENCMARK o CAPPED REBAR o HUB & TACK EXISTING MANHOLE • SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CATCH BASIN DECIDUOUS TREE. EVERGREEN TREE Q. � c� o LU U.. 0 0. 0 - 0 NOV 5199Q= , Sir No_ 1 OF l ,ios No_ . 89 - 3033 MW 1/4 SW 1/49 SW 1! 1/4 SW- 1/4 SEC. 5, TWP. 27 N., RGE, 4 W, M a. 1 ! I I I i r I I I I I QJV a 88 09 7.6 , I ' ' ' I A6 •h�'15 167.51' I I 1 lk I I 1 ' I I I I ,6� r I � I 51• •h1 / / 9r0 .2 �IP � r 4>� I I LI I � I �" I I / 0 rya � I � \ � ) •�� l ' tiT � �l 2G+gD VAC11T/GKl �Y G/TY EX 7773 /ILhO RESEf�VEVi ' , �.b � r '• / / EASEMENT K/�iNTS FOfz L/TiL/T/6� `� END �°� i t l / •� / I it ' OVEIr VACATED P0f?'r14V / OF tie F,Irr/ ,r0 q9 ✓NEADOVVOAT rO • RECof7/J6p a"Og4 AF 7906/903✓D C� 1 /ye . t ry. � r r �� . rya P� 2ryr ( 8 � � � I � � � 5`° 3 ��. � "°� � • �. rP I o > �00 I „ r,� • �3 pry �ro c^P 1 '4>' rp r EPA / l a r /. �1 1tr • �� 4\� �h •r�°0 �,,, r•' rj • / r i j 4 � �:� / r ' �D D� y i hr SUBJECT SITE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE �oF?770rc l of EASE �t�fEx/7' �t/oRTNF,gLY aF P✓4DPOsEp NEB' WALK W,4Y LDG4T/Ol �D /3E I�ACATED --- TERM/N/a T /D�l/ L// VE f•A„ .gFgq�52�/86 i &aX9 �5-iY o/ i I 1 / � 41 CP f / l f j i / / S h' I I ' I • / 1 TO BE CONVEYED 116 / TO CITY OF EDMLC NlNDS 0 I I / A� O g ' 0 }. y' - 3Rn� ST `SSW z� TO1 '`'�R6�.i. r 'In 144TH PL SIN' 51aeTH ST tSi n _ S' y7t•� ta_ "L S.v 3•� 2' S lC,ih' Pi Isw t - ._`�r_rHP�is�v'3 F PL 5 �' PUGET �Rty1A BEAC e�� s ��,.; -�� ;n:•sTSw �; > . c M I-H Pl Sd` ' 'DRmA gct,CH 1LTA � 't �.,�' 1° nyvi 1G Ti-fi .< SW r — -- : — aET. 1443tH NORMABEACH FISH P�s:� s:v �Ri'<i�� � " - ��� ,,, L sr+ s7 -w I T:aTH PL S STiS':. Imo"\O„ " �f i 152;J0j ST =t'•' 153RD ST t6lT { 'Ii3P.6 YL SUBJECT SITE �= g "h I ; 'r> 1EADO1Dr:y ST ;Tr1 3,3 3 '•Sri 75 T4 ST S h� >f K ='S7T�1' a S••ti, ?i Sh S:V !MTH SST • ' - I S.. -, =�� 11, ��i-T,-OTh sw� -- ' -_ F 5T_-:SN-�- � ,� ❑GOTT_i•'�+t� T- - - >- _ - - _ _ �.- HAR�� 161ST PL Sl4 yVq 'e'✓c ,nv v, .�� 9 �� -`Ltsr:D SIP: ST ZSiISW I S 163RD PL sv� 'j= n!E<TN 1-.Silt o'ews'i SW,� ¢ I ?164 TH ti - I ST SW -1 163 ryyHh 166TH> cl S;'.vo0v�Sl Q�r '1ST 6 SW I 161H > +6Cin , McADOtro'D.:LE ¢ v: sv I \�IFQiTT Pi r131 O $7 � .r. ,, i 1 � � - I ,•, Pl �c-i I ...,..ni sT MT. P� sw`EI o 1n� '<i J ce nur I alai swl 3at7 NC sT sw I P OF= 5 R ST;SW . ,�r sr sw I per W1,, =I ,N P (T 7E.\9f.'c tigPO C.S. 1R+ 3'/r .t`2 M1'D S71`2Na I ._ J 1T;N0 _i 57.'J qlv ST ti i�y.,/ nnoSW •t- n aL M P PL SW TaT •LS ., ¢ sv. .*" 3 � •_sv. -_ ¢T 'y.: t r sw sw j� I- ansrRi _ t' n�* =1 �3 I i sr - z 1 lJ lli2 4< is:: - C �Po VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ti a�10 DATUM: CITY OF I / 442 S . FT. 13 °� EDMONDS SCALE: 1/8 = / LEGAL DESCRIPTION p©3 Nn ,� q.�9 I ' Lot 11, Blocb: 29, of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in r� ��(� ? Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, 45" 43.. W Washington. a rl TOETHER wi-hvacated Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. LN: TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West E (Seaside Avenue) and vacated North Meadowdale Road lving Northerly of and abutting the line described as follows; Coll IENCING at the Northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the • b Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, ' / .1 ' Recc-rds of Snohomish County, Washington; thence N88'09143"W along \'(_� the North line of said lot, and the Westerly prolongation thereof, VA D T f0 � *4u / � 3Q % � � / a distance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin of vacated 76 Seaside Avenue at a point on the arc of a curve from which the �� �• �/ / /��C` 6, i / center lies N78'23'2811W (description 1177-231281-W) 5258.8 feet .� distant; thence Southerly along said curve and margin .to the right I /PD/R!%Or ' r1 L:t rough a central angle of 1'31132" an arc distance of 140.02 feet / / / t� • to the POIT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence S88'09'43"E 54.43 r j ;10 � POINT thence N62'01'00"E 145.01 feet to the terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured at right angles from the centerline of 75th Place West; thence Easterly along the i= centerline of said North Meadowdale Road to the right of way of Art i / / 75th Place West. i s` C� Q > / O / / // • Q a r _ Q 0 r N d r. 0 .�. / I in icep cc LU z / M O / m ^ z , LLI 1 Ul vV C) 9 Q z 0 z T✓ R!l , AF No. 7906190310 LOT AREA = 18,544 SCE. ET. 3 LEGEND CC a TEMPORARY BENCMARK 0 O o CAPPED REBAR 0 o HUB4 TACIT � EXISTING MANHOLE 0 • SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CATCH BASIN DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE ff>, EETFILI Ago - 0 UJ 4m JNP — V SHEET NO-- 'I OF 1 JOB NO89 - 3033 'l y i5P i -wo am 09' 43" W 2 4.4 ' . /*1' 01 / NC, ' 0 �R7NERLY �F PRDPOs�D NEVY l�'ALKW�tY �Oc•4rroe r� 6E I/,gCAr�D TERM/NAT /Del! E L IAI E "A OTE' >� r 1 / Gb 1 I ITO BE CONVE TO CiT Y OF EL l I /f . a / V�, • „2. 0 o DATUM: ITIf ' y�� �. .. .. .... \i l 7r` ry l b 5. •'��� / 61 SCALE: 1/8" - 1' i Ly LEGAL DESCRIPTION Z 69 11, Bloc),: 29, of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. I TOGETHER with vacated Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. ' AND TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West (Seaside Avenue) and vacated North Meadowdale Road lying Northerly �0 of and abutting the line described as follows: 1 CM4ENCING at the Northeast corner of Lot 11, Block 29, in the 141 ' Plat of Meadowdale Beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, • Records of Snohomish County, Washington; thence N88'0914311W along ! the North line of said lot, and the Westerly prolongation thereof, a distance of 177. 61 feet to the Westerly margin of vacated / 16 Seaside Avenue. at a point on the arc of a curve from which the center lies N78'23128"W (description N77'23128"W) 5258.8 feet I distant; thence Southerly along said curve and margin.to the right / j•,�•I � through a central angle of 1*31132" an arc distance of 140.02 feet A to the POINT OF BEGINNING of said line; thence S88'09143"E 54.48 feet; thence N62'01100"E.145.01 feet to the terminus of said line at a point on the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road lying 30.00 feet Westerly as measured at right angles 'from the i — 4Qw centerline of 75th Place West; thence Easterly along the centerline of said North Meadowdale Road to the right of way of ' 75th Place West. q%'1 Z ��1v� � � g m 1 •' i / r� 1 N o o .cb .^ J 0- a f- 4; �.. W M; N �-a) N x . °C '� t w ° n w � cr a AF No. 7906190310 LOT AREA - 13,644 SO. FT. LEGEND t ® `.TEMPORARY BENCMARK a CAPPED REBAR o HUB & TACK ° EXISTING MANHOLE SPOT ELEVATION L J EXISTING CATCH BASIN DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE 0 oc 0 0 U) 0 a 4- O NOV 51990 U sHa-r NO. 1 OF I' JOB NO: . 89 - 3033 R-31, 11 l. In -1 fl- 12 / / / � ^ m L< Vc Wt Tc AI 1= 01 C( Pl Rr tI a S. tl t! f 6 3 c c 7 LOT LINE STAKES MUST AL ®ESCRIPT101M BE IN PLACE AT t LEGAL I TIME OF f� � I r 1 _I _ I ,t 1:, HlecP. 29, of ,tne plat of Meadowdale beach as recorded in N Q FOUNDATION INSPECTION of plats +fume 5 , PSIe 30, Records od a f Snohomish County, �`J 'r I iuhington. II ` 74-, 7� iCETHEFt with vacated Seaside Avenue adjoining thereto. IZ1 —� i ,EvIttt WITH that portion of vacated 75th Avenue West —_ _ _ ID Toride Avenue) and vacated Horth Haadowdale Road lying Northerly ID TO follows: -'K and auutting the line described as ! iilock 29, in the 6 r1,.MEttcIHG at the Northeast corner of Lot il, .at of Neadowdale Beach, recorded in Voluze 5 Of Plats, page 3g, l � �crrd:, of Snohomish County, Waahingtont thence 1188 09'43"W along ►u North line of said lot, and the Wasturly prolongation thcreor, �� ` � ��� � distance of 177.61 feet to the Westerly margin 4f vacated I 1 r i % a Avenue at a point on the are of a curve from vhic:h the e.� \ ` ��� �� / E _ .asiq t7e'23'8"W (duucription H77.23'.20+'W) 5250-e feat C) `1 i( lO :ntor liar 1 � 1, /�- ��� � � / istAntt tr.ence Southerly along said curve and margih.to the right `q �p r , t f l `1 j ~ O 1 trough a contral angle of 1.31'32" an are distanceofi40.02.54e48 �� r V) ( I (J ehA f'UZNT Gi UECTNt1LNG of said linwJ thence se i i ` f 1' L/ • thenca 1162'U1'00"E 14 f s Lost to the terrrinuts of raid lino '// �// �' — �1'f / at, 1 C A point on the contorliho of said ltorth Hoadowdale Road lying t;estrrly as AeasLrad at right angles from tha 3.00 fact interline of 75th place Float; rhehco Eusturly along the � gut,' Road to the right of way of I 4�'` + kntorline of said North HoAdc g i J \ + ` I 5th Place Wust. 0., (1 \ '• ��- [�� C I ` -- R �, AV,/1 . �f' "2 % i f,,�,•f'=' \ \ ` ,; ;'`1 _;. j%.-:! �.- .- \ ,'', `•.\ ,'��, j 1, MT � i I I ;' � � � � � � � I � _ _ �:- ,✓r,��• •- H P \Le AT Ile DK I \N /4.1tL ..J # ( I I _ ` ----- - N I �• l - J - -- - _ ___- \ _ \-__ - -- y 1 ) C �, ov.1 N �t� I.IN d►u.l o-t�' fA- ; == A,7--_—_—_ . or ! I l MAW eo os of S�7 l rytVo `y' 4 E tA ! 1 I I 1 1. I '4 lu w yVF�� F n i o 16ott1 LIi.�N �Y /YW r e� 17 FFLAN 6ENEVAL N�- j : Gct 1WrrR Ta VF..p-tl--T AM bi►-�i��itQ�i r 3. G��� 'tom GOM �L'� vfl R��t�1 MAN DdT�o colL� FEAT JN 81-Y-0 i i 0 'AU/ 19� GoNSUI-TAOT,� INC. V4A4 A {Z�VI�Wtd ��,UIw1t�lU �oUr•ID�T�� �� �?�.caMM�Dd-t"IOt�I�,►.TN� oY�R, � A 1 41 11'VF— n .gym I rqx:k'Jff'e,-i Ply" ids A'2 r--AN , Pr- TAl l.'i e�Ri ,i]oNe7 A -A G� F I 4 r L �- i✓•. Tax NuM �IE"I]1✓1 14."' 1 �It�JT �� �1 !.V T I I�ll�1Cr 1r i/�".,'.' _�n�• !� G Grt AZ I tJG� PEA '� 7�' o• �-� Gvrt n , �t vv� , "• -7 3 1, V; ' ' eb6M IPN_f op 14-T N-r-, ` �fv' b � v. F �l 15r;,,•I , 8 4 21 of ; . W Zo 8 °/ zl %. �' Irl�ut�4�i7N �� �•�v II�.� � � P�tr--�� �• G�IUINGI - .' � •30 3 a w�.�: -• t� t � Z I ELrx - I'j �)o -7 POO> qZ,�S +rii"'I 4--- 't" 51.001 sr.o�.f 05'a-I. -M, HT, 76,0v. hcrulaL. SIT='75.-15' pNuN ' I G1rl�E � Ntrir G I [:aUCGN cou'r 1?it-1 'T T S r .- 3 PLAN � 5 Iota N t�� Fp�ti l r#� FLAN Fib . ND�f�''�fi�f' �Ut1N t�fk'i1c�J , FOAM I NG� 1394 RI-MS1 ?II�YI ";IIITI I•T {Z LR E Y S1A1E Uf WASI :ir? SHEET T17LE: '21TV- RAN , INt� oP' �pW}N�c JOB NO.: Iz Flo; DATE- '7 - ,Z7--q DRAWN BY: REVISED: „wo VIUNII'( MAI' ��o° Q � yo 1