Loading...
16010 70TH AVE W.PDF111111111111 5516 16010 70TH AVE W 1#IC i�TORKS DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTION CALL permit ? � .� T Ext. R PERMIT ��, . ��n, Issue Date � '*'PERMIT MUST BE NNW A� 1. Address ofConstructionA,,J 2. Property Legal Description L o + ; s- _-2 :s-to-7 IT E� I LYNNWOOD LINE (include all easements) 3. Single Family Residence Multi -Family No. of Units Commercial 4. Owner and/or Builder �rq-n { % ,. ��, �^_ tG� C _c, 5. Contractor & License No. ¢' l+4nc c)(Z"' 4R3 M 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (:Yfjff¢) before excavation) . 1`800`454-5555 '4 E-4 7. Cross other private property: Yes No /k' Easement required - H attach legal description and county easement number. 5 ' a a READ THE FOLLOW'I.NG AND SIGN: a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on >4 their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. w b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each H installation for one year. a c. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (611) side sewer line. v d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (3011) to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2� (1.15°) and maximum grade of 100% (450). H f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45° (1/8,bend) is°allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. .. ; 1. Inspection during normal working hours onl k�) working days notice required.• DATE: certify that I have read and shall comply with the above PERMIT FEE: DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED BY: Date: GW 77L4h4 ("A4rge 00 B Date: CONNECTION E: APPROVED By: Dates j - t 3iP. 8V J/M JG%StrPJ * PRRMTT MTTrT "FtTi! ztna?+'Ci4i3. �' . ;T n fT� �lr 1�L7iYr. Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds A Np EASEMENT NO .. .............................................. NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS E] LID NO. ...... . ASMT. NO . ................ OWNER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR ...... ...... cc . ....... _----------- PERMIT NO. .. ......3......1 ... JOB________________ . SS ...... ............... 70 Aug- W, - --------------------------------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...... _�3 --- (-;S-. z BLOCK NO. ------ - - --------­--------- LYNNWOOD LINE ........................ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - NAMEOF ADDITION ------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S6vos6e 3c4-184c Pnftr-'c 'P'.Pc) 7.'Op. T 4-%4 wee 7' 1) 70 AVE LJ� PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) Approved: OIL By SOS" STRE r HLE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-3202 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Addition to Single Family Residence Proponent: Steve Van Horn, 1603 Palm Ave. S.W., Seattle, Wa 98116 Location of proposal, including street address if any: 16010 70th Ave. W., Edmonds Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by , 1992. Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Ednio 9 20 Date: �� Signature: XX v/ You may appeal this determination to be Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later tha vI-j < , 1992, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on 6 z7 1992, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Department of Ecology Enviromnental Review Section P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX Steve Van Horn 1603 Palm Ave. S.W. Seatttle, WA 98116 PC Building Division Plan Clieck # 93-75 Page 1 of #9375.DOC 0625/93 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 TO: BUILDING DIVISION PLAN CHECK # 93-75 FROM: John Bissell AICP, Code Enforcement Tech. Jeffrey S. Wilson, AICP Responsible Official DATE: JUNE 25, 1993 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISITING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, PLAN CHECK # 93-75 I have had the opportunity to visit the site, review the environmental checklist, critical areas review and mitigating conditions of the critical areas review, site plan and building plans, a copy of which are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that a determination of nonsisnificance be issued. Review by Current Planning Supervisor: I concur I do not concur Comments: Jeffrey S. Wilson Date Attachments PC: PLAN CHECK # 93-75 Robert Chave, Planning Manager Page _ of _ A9375.DOC 0625193 ..... ... _ • h{. Y1G '�1H7 G 16,4210 1 �t�. �-lis•P P^?txa, of -(RaGT , a%, ME.00WDA.r-- I>P . I Ac�oaslNra To Ft o.-r 'tl1eR-Eop .O \/ou.IME 5 of --- - YIA?-, rf"E � RF�aRos A I Or- SNoMpr��,fj GouH'Ty , WASNIf V�T0N. ooc�- N Jr�IgG� � � \ oa- O I OhINF � : PvRui ONE — - hA!,t3'f Ilo03 PALM pcJE. !�.kl. �sF-�'TTi,�, t�. 6I6o ECHfVED -Z iN -Mis o•IzEA. UN - 2993— d p MIT COUNTER _ N — — — — — — N ee I)' - PION NoFZ:rH L-I 3 CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST j u H _ 2 1993 PERMIT COUNTER A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: �6l/'c_ ra �C'k lyd1b�hl 2. Name of applicant: S/�d I �'_' 'y' V, 'A'all 3. Address and phone numb e of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: (?1 [ / q -3 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Gv�. -cam 3 (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activit relate to or connected with this proposal?- If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 1 of 26 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Oat rolling, hilly, steep s opes, mountainous, other: / (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? tM ►-�. s �; S feel > 3 0 2o (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Pane 3 of 26 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 6 6 (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLTl10-8-91.MASTER Paae 5 of 26 ( STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions. Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. A) 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note 'location on the site plan. /y 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anti�c�ipated volume of discharge. yv /0 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, propose, and approximate quantities if known. /V V rwKVT11f1_R_g1 rkAACTFR Pane. 7 nF 19 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impact s, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: Calder,)maple, aspen, other: 1__/evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pi a other: rubs rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cabbage, other:_ cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of' -vegetation will.be remove or altered?.,________. - A) L)V, e-, CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 9. of 26 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. j� ` yr\, (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: A) (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etcit will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. & (STAFF COMMENTS) _ CHKIT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 11 of 26 (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, iif�any- V /� (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Z_14 ( STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ( STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ( STAFF COMMENTS) (lU®cS '/r-�GC(9 CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Paae 13 of 26 (STAFF COMMENTS) ,y f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ( STAFF COMMENTS) Z&4) ) /is /Y rLT J P,5�0-e- 9. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? AJ (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 15 of 26 b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed, a;easures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ( STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the princ�i�ple� exterior building material(s) proposed? O •. -� J (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 17 of 26 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? M-e rLG (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, 'f any: Az Alt - (STAFF COMMENTS) P UVI T11^ 0 [f1 k A A CTCO D- 10 -4 7G b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? h//� (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). AA) (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 21 of 26 1p 16. Utilities a. C' utilitie rrea 4saailable at site: ctricit , atural a , water, efuse service, telephone sanit sewer, septic system, er: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed._ /,4— (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that, a ad agency is relying on them to make its decision. S611,� Signature of Proponent Date Submitted CHKLT/10-8-91.MASTER Page 23 of 26 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-3202 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Addition to Single Family Residence Proponent: Steve Van Horn, 1603 Palm Ave. S.W., Seattle, ��iy Ur r_J.:,UiUOS Location of proposal, including street address if any: 16010 70th Ave. W., Edmonds Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by , 1992. Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Title: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue -North, Edmo , 9 20 Date: 4q 3Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to bey{ Chave, Planning Manager, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later tha �i . 1992, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on Z' 1992, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX I•� Steve Van Horn 1603 Palm Ave. S.W. Seatttle, WA 98116 Building Division Plan Check # 93-75 #79375.DOC 06MM Page 1 of RECEIVED Critical Areas Checklist FEB 19 193 Site Information PERMIT COUNTER Project Name: �v2hc1,-aillla 4PY�- PeriniNumber: Ed»�aS Site Location: 4010 c. �J Property Tax Account Number. 5 13 l - (�y l� - OY�, ' 1 Y Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): a-0, CV"'✓ SD Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? A)O Date of most recent action: N� Soils / Topography 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? /4J ."', � 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. 6' Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) y/Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments 2-C S S S 7o (.12u d e- 6ti' � �Z� 5 � e - 45Z,e Gt Hydrology/Vegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water_ �-� cJ Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in the floodway 4)1-4 floodplain 41� of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows acr ss the grounds surface? �%�a flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? %�17 8. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ; shrubs _;mixed . 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: �u U 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: _ .........._.............................._......... _ _.._ ..._ ..... _ _ _ .......................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... a r � &90.199- City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. nth a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a-vicinitymap of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Name Title 1603 f, / ,,, ,) Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Applicant Representative: Name Title Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date A" City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Van Horn, Stephen Determination #: CA-93-44 Project Name: Jandrall / Van Horn Permit Number: Site Location: 16010 70th Ave W Property Tax Acct #: 5131-000-046-11 Project Description: An addition on the north and south sides of the home. Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): XX There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; XX The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; _ XX The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. That any development, within 50' of the top of the bank located to the west of the property which would require any disturbance of soil, would require another evaluation of the Critical Areas Checklist for steep slopes and unstable soils. 2. The applicant must follow the requirements of the Engineering Division for erosion control (ECDC title 18). Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Communit DevelopCode. IqStephen F. Bullock Le Name Sign ure ate MAR-13-2001 02:33P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:1/3 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL -� ASSOCIA N'GA `i'ES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Facsimile Transmittal -Aow 7014,WL To: 474— Company: Cc J-�r 16 cl k,JS Phone: `tZS— ;.:?t_UZZ_,,j Fax: 4 z, 4:11 a z Z l From: ;�ej �Company: Nson Geotechnical Associates, Ina 17311-13e Ave. NE, A-M Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425.4W18W Fax: 426 481 2510 Date: 3 - i3 - o ( Pages Including Cover Page: 3 NGA Filed: 3 p� b UOA cc: Comments: L C� P MAR-13-2001 02:33P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:2/3 -umim Characterisfics SIB I Sf.416 34M2. - foy Wit RM. S.77:7. Materials of Construction 0 'Odle WRN- ROAW 41 d!g. Cgif hVI Medtaeiccl sell fmr. "S/Commk Sail Bodr. bw Upper Sbto Raw 14 1woring Linm Immij %gle Row Bd ROW4 BCLSI Cast Iran foglamars I Steikless Steel vairfftrMonre 012tel momomm man mooffilmommom V-IAE*- mi mass Mom "-Slm NKMINNEW Runs 20" 2 6, :Tat lOQl tt,• g Dimensional Data iP w j mom PUMP am 2-3fA PUMP IFF AUjtoRA/M"—R61&A-T19- Pgfflnm.- 10co or 1940 Roney PAMd., Ashland, Ohio 44805 (419) 2B9-3042 TOTAL P.05 MAR-13-2001 02:34P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:3/3 Page 1 of 1 Hydromatic - Model OSP33 1 _ _ 1 HYDROMATIC Model OSP33 V, M20 W. am _ OMS a do o ° 10 30 �D SD bQ cry.,trpU.iar.t► llri6� � 1 2 J 1 Performance Curve Home j Address I Phone Director j Search f Write Us prgt acts Oishibu or Locator I Distributors OM I New_5 & Knowledge I Software_p4tes1 Pentair Pump Group Copyright ® Pentair Pump Group_ All Rights Reserved. Please send feedback to We)Q- astg[ Last Updated: September 04, 107 3/7101 http://Www•gspurnp.corn/osp3 3 Itm FEB-21-2001 12:50P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICRL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:1/7 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL --�NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Facsimile Transmittal �r 66 � 12�0'O'W04W- RECEIVED JTo: �,y �GG.-Asw.�.. Company: y / ZZ.r�•>..z1S FEB 2 12001 Phone: qz.s- 74 ( - oz-4,o ENGINEERING DIVISION Fax: y-2-5*-7.1— 01-z-► From: -.00J re P- Company: Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. 17311-135 h Ave. NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425-486-1669 Fax: 425-481-2610 Date: 2--2t—a Pages Including Cover Page: 7 NGA File 9: 30g1 /go cc: Comments: e-,, �s 7��o FEB-21-2001 12:50P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:2/7 REFCEl Ve Pro 0 21 ?001 E"GINEEII/NG DIVISI February 12, 2001 Mr. Burt Lockhart 1103 - Olympic Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 3091B01 Dear Mr. Lockhart_ This letter presents our recommendations for the storm water detention/discharge system at your planned new residence. The site is located at 16010 - 70th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. The City of Edmonds required a detention system with ultimate discharge to the city storm water system instead of infiltration at the site. You requested we look at the potential for infiltration and if infiltration was not possible provide recommendations for the detention system based on City of Edmonds requirements.. We have previously prepared a foundation evaluation on the exposed subgrade soils at the site. You have provided us with an e-mailed copy of a site plan showing the catch basin and proposed house locations and faxed copies a the lot survey, impervious area calculations and a site plan with several ground surface elevations near the proposed house site, 2001 for our use in preparing this letter. The drawings are all untitled and undated. You requested we explore the possibility of infiltration of storm water from roof drains on the site with the City of Edmonds. We contacted their building and hydraulic engineer groups and were told that infiltration was not an option in the area even though the site soils were suitable for infiltration. We then discussed with you options for location of the detention system required by City of Edmonds' Code. A location north or east of the proposed building site would possibly allow for gravity flow from the system to the City's storm sewer system. Drainage from the west and south side of the residence will have to be \\Server\company\NGA Word 2001\Letters\Geotech\Storm water discharge\3091b - Lockhart - storm water discharge tener.doc Draft - Subject to Review by Senior Engineer FEB-21-2001 12:51P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICRL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:3/7 Geoiechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.3091 1301 February 12, 2001 Page 2 pumped to the detention system if the system is located east or north of the structure. If the detention system is located west of the structure, the outflow from the system will have to be pumped to the appropriate discharge point, a catch basin in the main street northeast of the site. You anticipate placing the system west of the north end of the building as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. We have provided a schematic of the City of Edmonds' detention system design in Figure 3. The tables given on Figure 3 are used for calculating the system size and outfall requirements. In our opinion, the system could be designed either with a sump on the west side of the structure that would collect water from the west and south roof drains or the detention system located west of the house could gravity flow to a sump. A pump in the sump would then pump the water from the sump to the detention system north or east of the house, where it would gravity flow to a catch basin, or if the system discharges into the sump, the pump would pump the water to the appropriate catch basin in the street. Your planned total new impervious surface including possible future expansions to the garage and driveway is 3317 square feet (sf) after allowing credit for the existing 790 sf basement. We recommend you size for an impermeable area of between 3000 and 3500 sf. for this area from Table 1, the required volume is 75 cubic feet (cf). You anticipate using a 24-inch diameter pipe. This pipe should be a minimum of 24 feet long based on Table 1. The required outlet from Table 2 is 3/4-inch. The catch basin could be either a Type IL, CB 16 or Type II, CB 19 (48-inch) basin. We recommend you consider the larger basin for more storage in large storm events. Your sump catch basin could be similar to the catch basins described so long as the basin has sufficient volume for pump efficiency. We recommend that all underground piping between the building and the detention system and between the pump sump and the county storm system be tightlined with rigid solid PVC pipe. You have chosen to have the system gravity flow into a sump. The sump pump would then pump from the sump to the catch basin. Care should be taken in sizing the sump. If the sump is too small, the pump could cycle on and off frequently, which could damage the pump. We expect that a minimum volume of 150 gallons would be a suitable size for the sump. A pump supplier should be contacted to determine the proper size for the discharge pump. We recommend you consider a run -dry, oil -cooled pump in case of float switch problems during system operation. we can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Draft - Subject to Review by Senior Engineer FEB-21-2001 12:51P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICRL 425 481 2510 T0:4257710221 P:4/7 Gecstechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.3091B01 February 12, 2001 Page 2 NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIA TES, INC. Ronald D. Free, PG Project Geologist RDF:RMI:dlh Two Copies Submitted, one unbound Three Figures Ralph M. Isaacs, PE Senior Engineer NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Draft - Subject to Review by Senior Engineer FEB-21-2001 12:51P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:5/7 Vicinity Map N Project Site o iS� C%J y 3 158TH S A a ; w E MONDS � � 158T 3 PL s iberxl 4 p � 3 a ^ 60T H a ST r_ SW r 4 1 PL 2ND ST SW 16 T err 1A' 7 .. w�.Ji •.'1 �0 ,A 262ND . Pt Si<t7 - + SM1 ►— a r E� ?E •163RD : } .63RD ST SW PL SW ---- 164TH 1s4TM P� Sw ST. .,:..._;' S►� LYNNWOOD Q p� sw �164TH ST SW 165TH L SW Q`ti y P E•IRW_000 '•"ti f� PL SW . a i _ r3 16TTii a 1 8p1" a� x fly Vl SW o a DOAM F-AbE t< MID,v- rn °9T � � ` PLA!'f1ELDS � 0 3' 3 � ,� `''`•', f(_ y� �. 1 NEA 4 ty #iM z ear } Q ST: SW a 3 17ri P `SW 172ND L � O °° � 173RD ST SW N P� W �y1pALE_ 172•ND <I 72ND SW a A t e0 s 3 p3 s F SW "'a ¢ 00 1..-73RD ST ^ RD42000 Thomas Bros. Maps Not to scale NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Residence NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 1 Company%ngadrafting20011coreldrawWicinity%309I Bvic.odr.jgl,2/14/01 FEB-21-2001 12:52P FROM:NELSON GEOTECHNICRL 425 481 2510 TO:4257710221 P:6/7 N BD 17 O U) OUTLET (TIGHTLINE) TO APPROPRIATE CITY STORM WATER CATCH BASIN c APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF CITY STORM WATER CATCH BASINS 89.12' APPROVED AS NOTED Site Plan N Q E O 160th St SW `". _ LEGEND eD!0e: VWgi ROOF DRAIN EI PUMP SUMP NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPING CONNECTING pip DETENTION SYSTEM DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE p 40 80 SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet Reference: Site plan based on an untitled and undated site plan provided by client, and an untitled, undated survey map faxed from Jerry Fulks & Company. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Property NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 2 Company\ngad rafting2001 kcoreldraw\siteplank3O9l Bsp.cdr:jgl,2/14/01 ROOFDRAI N OVERFLOW LOCKING LID_ LOCKING LID (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) H DETENTION PIPE LENGTH 11-FT. MINIMUM INLET (TIGHTLINE) UPPER CATCH BASIN 0 sizz Table 1 - Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Pipe Diameter Area (Sq. FL) Vol. (Cu. FL) 15" 18' 24" 30' 2000 50 40 28 16 10 2500 Q 62 75 50 35 20 60 42 24 13 15 Required Pipe 3500 87 70 49 28 18 Length in Feet 4000 100 80 56 32 21 4500 112 90 63 36 23 5000 125 100 70 40 25 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Alurunum CMP .asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not perrutled on roads) N: s'-NIGINEERING Reference. Detail based on an undated drawing tilled -Standard Drainage Detentroletn- from manual titled City of Edmonds Development Information. Drainage System Standards. Tables 1-2,- a'n based on Assoc Sand 3 Gravel Company Standards, revised 3116/95 0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE Drainage System Detail (NOT TO SCALE) 6-INCH MIN. CLEARANCE MEASURED FROM TOP OF CONCRETE BLOCK OR RISER FINISHED LOCKING LID GRADE (TYPICAL) — PUMP SUMP t TO CITY STORM WATER (�j� SYSTEM CATCH BASIN OUTLET CONTROL ALJ 9-INCH MIN. ORIFICE CONTROL CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE Table 2 - Outlet Onfice Sizes Impermeable Area Sp. Ft. Outlet Orifice Diameter (In ) 2000 518 2500 3000 5/8 314 3500 3/4 4000 718 4500 718 5000 7/8 SUMP PUMP NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPES CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC Table 3 - Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements Detention Pipe Max. Size Catch Basin Diameter (In.) Knockout (In.) Type <18 tat 20 26 Type I, CB 15 Type IL. Ca 15 24 to 6 36 Type 11, C8 19 (48' Basin) 36 to 42 42 Type II, CB 19 (54" Basin) NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Property J NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. RLe No. FiGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091800N 3 ccmpanYWqlOriRup1007korcMrewbxe OrsnC091Boil .mrtgl,7lr':Or \ City of Edmonds Development Services Department Building -Planning -Engineering 121-5th Avenue North • 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-0221 FAX COVER PAGE 170 Date Transmitted: Recipient's Fax No: W� , W -!ogy No. of Pages: b (Including cover page.) If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call (425) 771-0220 and ask for: Re c:receptionyana/faxsheet.doc T • GARY HAAKENSON '�.••' _ _ MAYOR l 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT the 1$0/0 Planning • Building • Engineering Gf`, j%tlrG December 5, 2000 Burt Lockhart 16010-701h Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 SUBJECT: On -Site Detention Requirement for 16010-701h Avenue West (Permit No. 200206) Dear Mr. Lockhart, An on -site detention system will be required for the subject residence. This requirement was imposed because most of the existing structure was demolished, and we do not credit what was removed. The only credit you will receive for existing impervious surface is the existing driveway and that portion of the basement that remains. The total impervious area for the house was calculated as follows: Total impervious surface of the house ...... 3,916 SF Existing basement that remains ........... 816 SF TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.. 3,100 SF It will be necessary to submit drawings that show the size and location of the detention system and where it ties to the City storm system. The existing driveway was exempt from the calculations. However, if the detention system is placed in such a way that it collects water from the driveway, you may wish to consider sizing the system to collect the driveway. I have enclosed the standard handout for drainage detention systems. Please provide three copies of the required drawing and worksheet and submit for review and approval. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-771-0220, Ext. 1324. Sincerely, /LXCHRISMAN 1"W DDISON IV Development Services Engineer ALC/cmc Enclosures DAMyDocuments\Engsec\DEVELOP\Lockhart.200206:do' c)7'cOrQ1ECi AL'GUS: _ 1 (R) ` City of edmonds development information Drainage System Standards The Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) (Chapter 18.30) requires special drainage control on all developments with over 2,000 square feet of new impervious covering. Development means: 1. A building or other construction permit for a development with more than 2,000 square feet of impervious surfacing. 2. A grading, rockery or retaining wall permit. 3. Final approval of a subdivision or PRD. Before issuance of any development permit and before development begins on any site, the developer must submit a drainage plan and obtain approval from the Engineering Division. the drainage system shall be installed concurrently with site development and shall be completed as shown on the approved plan. Development exceeding 5,000 square feet of impermeable surface must have the drainage plan prepared and stamped by a licensed civil engineer. Any plan for a project located in a critical drainage area, in an environmentally sensitive area or on a site presenting special problems must be prepared and stamped by a licensed civil engineer, regardless of the impervious area on that site. All other developments not exceeding 5,000 square feet of impermeable surfacing may use standard plans. The remainder of this document describes the standard plans. Preprinted sheets for preparing standard plans are included in this packet. If you have questions of a technical nature, please call the Hydraulics Engineer at (425) 771-0220. Standard/Preferred Plan Approach The standard plan approach uses an enclosed subsurface detention system discharging at an acceptable outfall location. Any other type of plan must be prepared by a licensed engineer. There is no assurance that the proposal you submit will be subsequently approved. t Basic Drainage Requirements Submit four (4) drainage plans to scale, preferably at a scale of 1 " =10' or I" = 20' on an 11 " x 17" or larger drawing sheet. Most applicants use the grading or plot plan submitted with their building permit. The following elements must be included with the drainage plan: 1. Show locations where concentrated surface water enters the property, the route it now takes through the property and the locations where it leaves the property. A description of the type and magnitude of flow should be noted on the plan - for example, "intermittent flow during storms in shallow grass swale" . Show all other surface waters. 2. Show locations and scaled dimensions of all existing and proposed buildings and other impervious surfaces. 3. Show the route and the types of channel to be provided for any concentrated flow that is to be changed. Note that structures are to be set back at least ten (10) feet from any closed drainage facility and fifteen (15) feet from the top of the bank of any channel, pond or stream. Additional setbacks or native growth protection easements may be required through the SEPA process. Structures must be at least one (1) foot above the maximum water level in the channel. Work in streams, ponds or channels requires a State Department of Fisheries or Department of Wildlife hydraulics permit. 4. Profile the elevations of the existing utilities and proposed drainage system (inverts, pipe sizes and ground cover). 5. Topography shall be shown if surface water enters the property from off site. Plan must show all drainage areas that contribute surface water to the site. Contour interval shall be two (2) feet; however, five (5) feet may be acceptable in. some cases. (Aerial photos with five (5) foot intervals are available from the City.) 6. Show all improvements or other methods of handling surface water runoff in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.30.060 of the ECDC and this handout (see Standard Plan Detention System). 7. A temporary sediment and erosion control plan is required. Section 18.30.050 of the ECDC delineates the requirements of the plan. The location of the sediment and erosion. control practices or devices and the limits of disturbed area must be shown on the plan view. Examples of temporary sediment and erosion control practices and devices include: a) Earth dike diversion to route clean off -site water around the disturbed area. b) Filter fabric fence. c) Straw bale barriers. d) Stabilized construction entrance. e) Temporary seeding practices. f) Practices used to minimize soil exposure. 2 Details of the sediment and erosion control devices are to be provided with the drainage plan. 8. A sequence of construction must be provided. The sequence must stipulate that the temporary sediment and erosion measures will be in place and inspected prior to any construction or site clearing. Furthermore, it must address the requirement for the sediment and erosion control practices and/or devices to be maintained until the permanent vegetation is established. 9. Calculations must be submitted when plans are prepared by a civil engineer. The detention work sheet must be completed and submitted when standard plans are used. Standard Plan Detention System 1. Select the outflow location. It must be low enough to allow the detention pipe to drain completely. a) If a public storm drain or public drainage ditch is within or adjacent to the property, direct the outflow pipe to these facilities. b) When there is no public system available, direct the outflow to a well defined drainage channel that drains through the area to be developed. The outlet pipe and the channel at the discharge location must be within the property. 2. Locate the underground detention pipe. The detention pipe must be placed downhill so that all impermeable surface on the site can be detained. 3. Indicate tightlines from roof drains and driveway drains through the system to the outflow location. Roof drains shall not be pined into footing drains Roof drains or footing drains shall not be connected to the sanitary sewer. Footing drains should not connect to the surface water system except in unstable slope areas where groundwater recharge is discouraged. (Discharging groundwater through footing drains to storm water systems can impact fish resources by reducing the low flow volumes of water in streams.) 4. Complete detention work sheet. a) Compute the impermeable surface area that will drain to the detention system and enter on the detention work sheet. b) Indicate the detention pipe diameter and specify the required detention pipe length for impermeable surface area using Table 1. Enter the pipe diameter and length on the work sheet. c) Indicate the required outlet orifice size for the impermeable surface area using Table 2. Enter the outlet orifice size on the work sheet. 3 Maintenance of Detention Systems Material must be removed from the catch basins and detention pipe to prevent clogging, especially at the outlet control system. Catch basins should be cleaned at least twice per year. Frequent catch basin cleaning will reduce the need for the more difficult task of cleaning the detention pipe. The system should be kept clean during construction. Material must be physically removed and not just flushed downstream. C:\My Dwummts\EngswNHANDOUTSIDRNGREQR.DOC 4 Table 1 — Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Area Sq. Ft. Vol Cu Ft 2000 50 2500 62 3000 75 3500 87 4000 100 4500 112 5000 125 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: Impermeable Area Sa. Ft. 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Pipe Diameter 15" 18" 24" 30" 40 28 16 10 50 35 20 13 60 42 24 15 Required pipe 70 49 28 18 length in feet 80 56 32 21 90 63 36 23 100 70 40 25 Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Aluminum CMP Asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not permitted on roads) Table 2 — Outlet Orifice Sizes Outlet Orifice Diameter (Inches) 5/8 5/8 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 7/8 Table 3 — Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements Detention Max. size Catch Basin pipe diameter knockout Type < 18" 20" Type I, CB 15 18" to 24" 26" Type IL, CB 16 24" to 36" 36" Type II, CB 19 19 (48" Basin) 36" to 42" 42" Type II, CB 19 19 (54" Basin) *Source: Assoc. Sand & Gravel Co. Standards 5 Revised 3/16/95 STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET OWNER CALC BY: ADDRESS PHONE: DATE: *****DESIGN DATA***** IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE DETENTION PIPE LENGTH LOCKING LID (TYPICAL) FINISHED G MINIMUM EE 6' MIN EDEFROMCfOP OF TIGH 1 E CONCUBOX OR RISER .SX TO IX SLOPE 0 OUTLET OUTLET CONTROL 9MIN, UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE CONTROL CATCH BASIN SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EQUAL FROM CONTROL CB 2'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK EftTRENCH mFROM CONTROL OUTLETK TRENCF� MIN 10' LONG, PE TOBELEVEL IPE W/ END CAPS SHALL BE LINED WITH MIRAFI PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF WASHED DRAIN ROCK RIPRAP OUTLET RUNOFF SPREADER. TRENCH ............ FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection APPROVED BY before backfilling and for final inspections. . 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice DATE must be kept open at all times. 6 - . Hf�-165THT CAt,G A oq 2 6 9 (0 G c A 98 ACTUAL- HeidTI+Te fa.4oc-0 _ 114,4 _ ► ^x HEICsrRT I M1P�RVIoUS �uRFac�._ c,P.I.� XIS'rI.NG-�?,�VIWINF�pa�D 1�1°12 SF EVE/ Abt7lTIoI.13 I Cos. SF X15TINCt PKIVr--wAy 2(pposp WSW tWAIVEWAY �jc�13p Nl;w tiF.Gc: jgosF EROSION CONTROL,�'1E t�GAL.E 4 �� � iL07 all IAISRECTION REQUIRE® OATrl M 100.00 G APPROVAL AS N E��R71TTfC�. r• _ r ._• 3(r�VJ FRAMING: General con above. Wall 16d nails, ar and multi-joi: syrpports beb by 2x4 studs per UBC tab' All wood In c FABRICATE - Fabricate an, architect / ov. I 1 1 1 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LETTER ' 16010-70TH AVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ' PREPARED FOR MR. BURT LOCKHART 1 I� 1 1 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 17311 —1351" Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 • Fax (425) 481-2510 March 19, 2001 Mr. Burt Lockhart 1103 - Olympic Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 3091B01 Dear Mr. Lockhart: Snohomish County (425) 337-1669 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 This letter presents our recommendations for the storm water detention/discharge system at your planned new residence. The site is located at 16010 - 70th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. The City of Edmonds required a detention system with ultimate discharge to the city storm water system instead of infiltration on the site. You requested we look at the potential for infiltration and if infiltration was not possible, provide recommendations for the detention system based on the City of Edmonds' requirements. We had previously prepared a foundation evaluation on the exposed subgrade soils at the site. You have provided us with an e-mailed copy of a site plan showing the catch basin and proposed house locations, and faxed copies of the lot survey, impervious area calculations and a site plan with several ground surface elevations near the proposed house site, for our use in preparing this letter. The drawings are all untitled and undated. You requested we explore the possibility of infiltration of storm water from roof drains on the site with the City of Edmonds. We contacted their building and hydraulic engineering groups and were told that infiltration was not an option in the area even though the site soils were suitable for infiltration. We then discussed with you options for location of the detention system required by City of Edmonds' Code. In our opinion, the system could be designed with either of two alternatives: Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West ' Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.30911301 March 19, 2001 ' Page 2 1. A sump could be installed on the west side of the structure that would collect water from the west and south roof drains and pump to a gravity detention system north or east of the residence. The detention system would flow to the catch basin by gravity. 2. The detention system could be located west of the house where it could gravity flow to a pump ' sump and be pumped to the catch basin in the street. All of the roof drains would flow by gravity to the detention system. You have informed us you anticipate placing the detention system and pump sump west of the north end of the building as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The system will gravity flow to a sump, then the water will be pumped to a catch basin in the street. We have provided a schematic of the City of Edmonds' detention system design in Figure 3. The tables given on Figure 3 are used for calculating the system size and outfall requirements. The planned new impervious surface area, including possible future expansions to the garage and driveway, is 3317 square feet (sf) after allowing credit for the existing 790sf basement. We recommend you size for an impermeable area of between 3000 and 3500sf. For this area (Table 1), the required volume is 75 cubic feet (cf). You anticipate using a 24-inch diameter pipe. This pipe should be a minimum of 24 feet long based on Table 1. The required outlet from Table 2 is 3/4-inch. The catch basin could be either a Type IL, CB 16 or Type II, CB 19 (48-inch) basin. We recommend you consider the larger basin for more storage in large storm events. Your sump catch basin could be similar to the catch basins described so long as the basin has sufficient volume for pump efficiency. We recommend that all underground piping between the building and the detention system and between the pump sump and the county storm system be tightlined with rigid, solid PVC pipe. You have chosen to have the detention system gravity flow into a sump. The sump pump would then pump from the sump to the city storm water catch basin in the street. Care should be taken in sizing the sump. If the sump is too small, the pump could cycle on and off frequently, which could damage the pump. We expect that a minimum volume of 150 gallons would be a suitable size for the sump. A pump supplier should be contacted to determine the proper size for the discharge pump. We recommend you consider a run -dry, oil -cooled pump in case of float switch problems during system operation. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIA TES, INC. Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.3091 BO 1 March 19, 2001 Page 3 USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Burt Lockhart and his agents for use in planning and design of this project. The data and letter should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our letter report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of site conditions or discharge volumes. The scope of our work does not include services related to final pump and catch basin sizing, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in site conditions and final design that may warrant relocation of the detention system. Our Site Plan locations should only be considered schematic. Actual location will be determined based on site conditions and grading per final project design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted engineering geology and geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. ' Sincerely, 7D. GEOTE I ASSOCIA TES, INC. Free, PG ' Project Geologist RDF:RML•dlh Two copies submitted, one unbound Three Figures 1 Ralph M. Isaacs, PE Senior Engineer NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Vicinity Map N Project Site c� 1ST z � 158TH S �. ¢ 3 r` � �a E MONDS� =I58TH PL 3 00 158TH 3 o a a �Fq 60TH a ST_---- SW _ lysry y 15M QO 16 PL SW Q� 1 2ND ST SW �9 161ST PL S I I 160TH �O 162ND PL a 1 6 jE 163RD > 163RD ST SW 164TH ¢ -4 -J p3 w PL sw Q LYNNWQOD ---- 164TH C SW ST SW (D 164TH PL SW s 3 ST SW — -I 165TH e� PL SW �� $ cer usa.Sw 164TH PL TH C PL d uct: FIRWOOD P I s t� o f -� r N 3- ----^ SW c � Z a. 166TH SW cy> 6TSIWN s P PL SW a i ' I 'A3C 5t ME4DOWDALE MID a, s 3 ; 16nH 0 p9TH PLA WADS £ y MEADOWDALE e l Svc Hs __ —-- Ha a= F 3 a X 54v 170711 i 172ND Q r o ST O Q SW �F 3 1,0� P SW a PL O 171-ST ST SW _ CC ^ �µ9� 173RD ST SW o " BF 112N� �, �--1• P� W l 172ND j 72ND - - - S W m C 3 ,Y SW a'a -� 69 �0 RQ ;93RD ST SW a __ :. , Si -�., sr SM - _ - - - - - P2000 Thomas Bros. Ma s Not to scale NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Residence 1\IGA ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 1 Company\ngadrafting2001 \core Id raw\vicinity\3091 Bvic.cdr:jgl,2/14/01 Site Plan N Q L 0 o APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF CITY STORM WATER CATCH BASINS OUTLET (TIGHTLINE) I Tr) APPRr)PRIATP (:ITV bo 17 244.09' NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPING CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC 0 40 80 I I Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet LEGEND ........ ROOF DRAIN O DOWNSPOUT ■ CATCH BASIN ❑ PUMP SUMP 160th St. SW I a 0 CEO DETENTION SYSTEM Reference: Site plan based on an untitled and undated site plan provided by client, and an untitled, undated survey map faxed from Jerry Fulks & Company. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Property NG A ASSOCIATES, INC.IFILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 2 Company\ngadrafting200l \coreldraw\siteplan\309113sp.cdr:jg1,2/14/01 INLET . (TIGHTLINE) ROOFDRAIN OVERFLOW LOCKING LID_ LOCKING LID (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) SPLASH BLOCK DETENTION PIPE LENGTH 1-FT. MINIMUM I T 0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE t 6-INCH MIN. CLEARANCE MEASURED FROM TOP OF CONCRETE BLOCK OR RISER FINISHED LOCKING LID GRADE (TYPICAL) / r—PUMP SUMP OUTLET CONTROL AJ:9-INCH MIN. UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE CONTROL CATCH BASIN Table 1 - Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Pipe Diameter Area (Sq. Ft.) Vol. (Cu. Ft.) 15" 18" 24" 30" 2000 50 40 28 16 10 2500 62 50 35 20 13 3000) 75 60 42 24 15 Required Pipe 3500 87 70 49 28 18 Length in Feet 4000 100 80 56 32 21 4500 112 90 63 36 23 5000 125 100 70 40 25 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Aluminum CMP Asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not permitted on roads) NOT TO SCALE I Table 2 - Outlet Orifice Sizes Impermeable Area Sq. Ft. Outlet Orifice Diameter (In. 2000 5/8 2500 5/8 3000 3/4 3500 3/4 4000 7/8 4500 7/8 5000 7/8 Reference: Detail based on an undated drawing titled "Standard Drainage Detention System" from manual titled City of Edmonds Development Information: Drainage System Standards. Tables 1, 2, and 3 based on Assoc. Sand & Gravel Company Standards, revised 3/16/95. Drainage System Detail (NOT TO SCALE) TO CITY STORM WATER SYSTEM CATCH BASIN SUMP PUMP NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPES CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM _AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC ITable 3 - Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements I Detention Pipe Max. Size Catch Basin Diameter (In.) Knockout (In.) Type <18 20 Type I, CB 15 18 to 24 26 Type IL, CB 16 24 to 36 36 Type 11, CB 19 (48" Basin) 36 to 42 42 Type 11, CB 19 (54" Basin) company\ngadrafting20011coreldraw\site plan13091Bdt1.cdr:jg1,2/15/01 Hydromatic - Model OSP33 Page 1 of 1 0 HYDROMATIC Model OSP33 12r ,o 't-=3,) a" 0=13 G�oilyU.S CP.H 10 21 3D 40 s0 60 70 Performance Curve rrypical Application jEffluent and Dewaterin um Ca acities to 00 GPM 3.7 I/s Heads to 5 ft 7.6 m Electrical INOV, 5V, 1 o, 8.5FLA, 60Hz 1 o, 3.61FLA, 60Hz Motor 111750 1/3 HP split phase w/thermal overload protection RPM Minimum Recommended Sump Diameter IlDuplex Simplex = 18" (457mm) = 30" 762mm utomatic Operation IDiaphragm pressure switch manual available Materials of Construction IClass 30 cast iron [impeller O en vane Naval Bronze Discharge Size 1-1/2" 38.1mm ; 2" 50.8mm Solids handling 5/8" 15.9 mm Power cord 10' , SJTW, 20' o tional Home I Address I Phone Directory I Search I Write Us Products I Distributor Locator I Distributors Only_ I News & Knowledge I Software Updates) Pentair Pump Group Copyright © Pentair Pump Group. All Rights Reserved. Please send feedback to Webmaster Last Updated: September 04, 1997 http://www.gspump.com/osp33.htm 3/7/01 qL�-� b4i OobD H. ut)/Ut) Pump Characteristics Manva'I'Models OSP33M.1 ..1DS?33M2' kulom:dllc, models WAI Sio 14'. .Full .Lood..Ai s.. A' Moto..� 'T pf.:7.:' h* -SOof Wd -V 43. Terri du nsulallan• -YE Power Cc r ;;26 iP. Materials of Construction Steel 0.1 Dielectric Olt = A0100 A' Punip"Coslis Cast Iron Shaft Steel mechanical Shaft. Seal Seal faces: Carbon/Ceramic Seal Body: Bross Sprin Stainless Steel Bellows. Bona-H Impeller Bronze Upper Bearing. Single Row RdN Beating Lower Boating Single Row Bail Rearing Base Cast Iron I Fostenors Stainless Steel I Pa%r$#%v-mnno-Aa rlrvf&-m Dimensional Data IrK• w- 'nioy A N ;'uh ups COS an ii, pprok8dal 7�. Itich too" wim prodaes and 1Wr aulko 11%114 PUMP ON t 2-3/4 AURORA/MYDROMATIC Pumps, Inc. 1940 Roney Road, Ashland, Ohio 44805 (419) 289.3042 PUMP OFF TOTAL P.05 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LETTER ' 16010-70TH AVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ' PREPARED FOR MR. BURT LOCKHART NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 17311 — 1351h Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 • Fax (425) 481-2510 March 19, 2001 Mr. Burt Lockhart 1103 - Olympic Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NCA File No. 3091B01 Dear Mr. Lockhart: Snohomish County (425) 337-1669 Wenatchee/Chelan (509) 784-2756 This letter presents our recommendations for the storm water detention/discharge system at your planned new residence. The site is located at 16010 - 70th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. The City of Edmonds required a detention system with ultimate discharge to the city storm water system instead of infiltration on the site. You requested we look at the potential for infiltration and if infiltration was not possible, provide recommendations for the detention system based on the City of Edmonds' requirements. We had previously prepared a foundation evaluation on the exposed subgrade soils at the site. You have provided us with an e-mailed copy of a site plan showing the catch basin and proposed house locations, and faxed copies of the lot survey, impervious area calculations and a site plan with several ground surface elevations near the proposed house site, for our use in preparing this letter. The drawings are all untitled and undated. You requested we explore the possibility of infiltration of storm water from roof drains on the site with the City of Edmonds. We contacted their building and hydraulic engineering groups and were told that infiltration was not an option in the area even though the site soils were suitable for infiltration. We then discussed with you options for location of the detention system required by City of Edmonds' Code. In our opinion, the system could be designed with either of two alternatives: 1 Ll 1 Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.30911301 March 19, 2001 Page 2 1. A sump could be installed on the west side of the structure that would collect water from the west and south roof drains and pump to a gravity detention system north or east of the residence. The detention system would flow to the catch basin by gravity. 2. The detention system could be located west of the house where it could gravity flow to a pump t sump and be pumped to the catch basin in the street. All of the roof drains would flow by gravity to the detention system. You have informed us you anticipate placing the detention system and pump sump west of the north end of the building as shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The system will gravity flow to a sump, then the water will be pumped to a catch basin in the street. We have provided a schematic of the City of Edmonds' detention system design in Figure 3. The tables given on Figure 3 are used for calculating the system size and outfall requirements. The planned new impervious surface area, including possible future expansions to the garage and driveway, is 3317 square feet (sf) after allowing credit for the existing 790sf basement. We recommend you size for an impermeable area of between 3000 and 3500sf. For this area (Table 1), the required volume is 75 cubic feet (cf). You anticipate using a 24-inch diameter pipe. This pipe should be a minimum of 24 feet long based on Table 1. The required outlet from Table 2 is 3/4-inch. The catch basin could be either a Type IL, CB 16 or Type II, CB 19 (48-inch) basin. We recommend you consider the larger basin for more storage in large storm events. Your sump catch basin could be similar to the catch basins described so long as the basin has sufficient volume for pump efficiency. We recommend that all underground piping between the building and the detention system and between the pump sump and the county storm system be tightlined with rigid, solid PVC pipe. You have chosen to have the detention system gravity flow into a sump. The sump pump would then pump from the sump to the city storm water catch basin in the street. Care should be taken in sizing the sump. If the sump is too small, the pump could cycle on and off frequently, which could damage the pump. We expect that a minimum volume of 150 gallons would be a suitable size for the sump. A pump supplier should be contacted to determine the proper size for the discharge pump. We recommend you consider a run -dry, oil -cooled pump in case of float switch problems during system operation. NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Evaluation Letter 16010 - 70th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No.3091B01 March 19, 2001 Page 3 USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Burt Lockhart and his agents for use in planning and design of this project. The data and letter should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our letter report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of site conditions or discharge volumes. The scope of our work does not include services related to final pump and catch basin sizing, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in site conditions and final design that may warrant relocation of the detention system. Our Site Plan locations should only be considered schematic. Actual location will be determined based on site conditions and grading per final project design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted engineering geology and geotechnical engineering practices in effect in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, ' NEL N GEOTEC N/ ASSOCIATES, INC. itc-1, Ronal D. Free, PG ' Project Geologist RDF:RMI:dlh Two copies submitted, one unbound Three Figures V. Ralph M. Isaacs, PE Senior Engineer NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Vicinity Map N Project Site C 3 z 3I 158TH_ S a' Q 1— MONDS 3 0 TSTr` �09 'ND SW �9 u 3 -o F— 3 � 164TH Q aIc 164TH pl S!p 165TH PL SW 1 S� � 3 J'� y J 7C 3 3 !— L[ a 158TH PL S4, 3 L� 158TH OTH a _ ST --- SW 1 Oro ti 159TH 16 PL SW —' Q 160TH 16 T Pi- I I 162ND PL -W' I s jE 163RD 168RU ST SW P-° P` ST LYNNWOOD Mco sw 164TH ST SW e� ti 3 3 164TH - PL SW C fP PL `' is F I RWOOD PL 3 SW � � M 166TN& SW 1671H PLSW 167TH 3 J 3PL E"WDALE NIP PL SW a a r o �9 I PLAYFIELDS `fie = d TH SW J 172ND at > o ¢ ST If 3 r Q� 173RD ST SW N SW e 3 e\ .. SS SW " a a Not to scale � � 3 S W ¢ to cJ P� W 69�0 MEADDWDALF 1 (( 170TH 1 P SW 1 �' 04 171ST ST SW ; �q�gp4E 172HO 172N - 4�- SW 173R0 ST S1V 4 SN . — _ _ � - - � - co P2000 T o�_mas Bros. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Residence NGA ASSOCIATES, INC. FILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 1 PL Company\ngadrafting200l \coreldraw\vicinity\3O9l Bvic.odr:jgl,2/14/01 Site Plan N a L O APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS I OF CITY STORM WATER I CATCH BASINS OUTLET (TIGHTLINE) I Tr) APPR(1PRIATF f`ITV 00 O U') 244.09' NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPING CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC 0 40 80 Scale: 1 inch = 40 feet LEGEND ........ I ROOF DRAIN o DOWNSPOUT ■ CATCH BASIN ❑ PUMP SUMP 160th St. SW I O 0===0 DETENTION SYSTEM I Reference: Site plan based on an untitled and undated site plan provided by client, and an untitled, undated survey map faxed from Jerry Fulks & Company. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL Lockhart Property NGA ASSOCIATES, INC.. FILE NO. FIGURE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS 3091 BOON 2 Company\ngadrafting200l \coreldraw\siteplan\309113sp.cdr:jg1,2/14/01 INLET - (TIGHTLINE) OVERFLOW LOCKING LID_ LOCKING LID (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) SPLASH %-BLOCK DETENTION PIPE LENGTH 1-FT. MINIMUM 0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE Drainage System Detail (NOT TO SCALE) 6-INCH MIN. CLEARANCE MEASURED FROM TOP OF CONCRETE BLOCK OR RISER FINISHED LOCKING LID GRADE (TYPICAL) PUMP SUMP T TO CITY STORM WATER SYSTEM CATCH BASIN OUTLET CONTROL � � ,' 9-INCH MIN. UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE CONTROL CATCH BASIN Table 1 - Detention Pipe Sizes Impermeable Required Pipe Diameter Area (Sq. Ft.) Vol. (Cu. Ft.) 15" 18" 24" 30" 2000 50 40 28 16 10 2500 62 50 35 20 13 3000 75 60 42 24 15 Required Pipe 3500 87 70 49 28 18 Length in Feet 4000 100 80 56 32 21 4500 112 90 63 36 23 5000 125 100 70 40 25 Note: Allowable Pipe Materials: Reinforced Concrete Aluminized Steel Aluminum CMP Asphalt Coated N-12 ADS (Not permitted on roads) NOT TO SCALE Table 2 - Outlet Orifice Sizes Impermeable Area Sq. Ft. Outlet Orifice Diameter (In. 2000 5/8 2500 5/8 3000) 3/4 3500 3/4 4000 7/8 4500 7/8 5000 7/8 Reference: Detail based on an undated drawing titled "Standard Drainage Detention System" from manual titled City of Edmonds Development Information: Drainage System Standards. Tables 1, 2, and 3 based on Assoc. Sand & Gravel Company Standards, revised 3/16/95. SUMP PUMP NOTE: ALL BELOW -GRADE PIPES CONNECTING DOWNSPOUTS TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM AND THE PUMP SUMP OUTFALL LINE SHOULD BE RIGID, SOLID PVC ITable 3 - Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements I Detention Pipe Max. Size Catch Basin Diameter (In.) Knockout (In.) Type <18 20 Type I, CB 15 18 to 24 26 Type IL, CB 16 24 to 36 36 Type II, CB 19 (48" Basin) 36 to 42 42 Type II, CB 19 (54" Basin) company\ngadrafting20011coreldraw\site plan\3091Bdtl.cdr:jgl,2/15/01 A M21-n0Ns 13 roe SF �yc65T1 N Ct PRI VIA-WA,Y 24000 sr- 0 -0S {..� �► N r-L,00P,- >~ck7TPp4 NT z,394 s theRc4i 1,16 5F I '� 1 i '1...: . AA i 1 - s ZO - 011 . 1 tew d ECIK - pRox I ` -N The CWA I i The Conte The Conte 5 hot52o of the bullc y The Contn Contractor Ali product ! current pul shall be br+ `A },. provided % Nj I industry, b: Ano to see Immediatel . aX 15t Nc-f a0 otherwise. omissions �4 Repetitive Contractor discrepant • Verify all rc installation verify local the work. s .. PROPERT Temporary ©EMOIIT11 lsgng we fisting foi arking are I$ITE CLFJ bintain adear and 4 • dvith(n exi; Protect drip-, i 7 WE DRAI - Use rigid st F X 1 :5T/ N Roof drains WAW Lrr�� CONCRET AN concrete concrete fo gallons wal foundation •. a oo f Inimum d, Pitch rock{ `60.00 01 N. ►21M Apply two co Wev- I Atlu'rtOiLip, FRAMING: General oonr R above. Wail, 13d nails, an a id multigoh s ipports be" p�2x4 studs r UBC tabl APPROVED BY PLANNING All wood In c 40 FABRICATE Q Fabricate an architect / off T inspections F l STAIRWAY STREE� Construct all -handrails as a ACCEPTABLE TIGH71INE MATERIAL SCR 35 IT OW by local— Wedeaffil medwftwWwk - OENERAL C The Convedw L The Ciontnm%lor The Contractor W of the buNft, wW : 4 and The Convector "' ContnKAor to provW4 All products In the do *xnnt published frte 0all be bro ght to th provided loft Instelle itidufty, by qualified I)RAWMS AND 00 Do not SM10 (IlMOnSli immediately N any ca otherwise. VeWy trill omissions to the arch Repetitive features nc Contractor sW verff) discrepand". Ve* a�# M '...dim hist—affa e of equqm Vedfy lot of &N 4r the work. Pfw4ide as - PROPERTY PROTEC Temporary W= to bi tst 4,1 wood *amed S stir " foundation to area le be ren WE CLEARING: I survey staket and oFvb only In dn thin6XWA-mg Walnu 'p-Ana of trees . E DRAANAGE: so ri& adiedule 40!1 Rod drains and boom GOVAPSIG is be afire 6011clete for lGeongs a off"s water per seek Foundations, Footinp hfmifnuat ;i;4ik below 4 Potch rock pockets and t Apply two coats of asptu , Wfm;rad owistruction Per .above. Walk shall have 16daags, and toenail W of d.rnufflAoist beams tog pports below. All now DATE RECEIVED d PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS USE �1 PERMIT ZONE �L J NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION SUITE/APTq AD ADDRESS / /D� a /fO-�� OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS / II t � '1 G✓ PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. V -Q ram. G h LID FEE $ MAILIN ADDRESS III Z 3 13 0 ��� �• e /S J PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved ❑ RW Permit Required ❑ O EXISTING PROPOSED Street Use Permit Req d ❑ Inspection Required ❑ Sidewalk Required ❑ CITY ZIP T LEPHONE g Z �i ! ) �,() b� S Z.2 �D ) REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground Wiring required ❑ NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO C7 cc t: ADDRESS REMARKS z x OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE r, cc w CITY ZIP TELEPHONE inst. :t FOR NAME ST BE PRESENT ENGINEERING REV EWER/DATE ADDRESS tz0 \ I z sz! Eve✓c rye �-� I J ri ��c �, f� FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE Z M 0'1 J I< , � t-co � �Z-J S -S .sS"_S' Z�z lf, VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBN INSPECTION REQ'D BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY S I v (-� l G UD ❑YES NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED Q PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 9 7 D i5 I EXP ❑ NEW 01 RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT L/R SIDE REAR C7 ❑ AUDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR z CHANGE OF USE PARKING LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT SIGN REQ'D PROVIDED IL ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ FENCE X FT) REMARKS ❑ DEMOLISH TANK { OTHER ❑ GARAGE CARPORT ❑ RETAININCKERYG WALL ❑ RENEWAL z O LAIN: (TYPE OF USE,Z=141L_ � BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CO OCCUPANTNUMBER UCHECKED �(n//`/C/— GROUP NUMBER OF CRITICAL �� SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT OF DWELLING AREAS m O STORIES UNITS NUMB�el REQUIRED ❑ YES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS t, PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REG'D o �sL.vr.o fit, 3oJ a fluo m 4- o t -Ily-� L,-e- VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING �^ PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO r BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE 't SEPARATE PERMISSION. I— D S HARGE w PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS a PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. R EW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION y "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING s EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND INSPECTION FEE cc , ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY RECEIPTPLAN = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE CHECK DEPOSIT o DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE i NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEI T t�U TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. O 1 IALS SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATU (O NER O AGEN /� DATE SIGNED ! (425) ' u� (,�', 771-0220 RELEASED BY DATE ATTENTION EXT1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE �� NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB j !, •--����}}}` 1- ) S ITErAPTa ADDRESS ,f/�// / J�p /�// VVVV ur Z ° OWNEVNAM/E/NAMEOFBy SINES S4 f r �)�d LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO LID NO O w MAILINQF ADDRESS p� D C V\ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED TESCP Approved D RW Permit Required O Street Use Permit Req'd O Inspection Required O Sidewalk Required O CITY ZIP / TELEPHONE NUMBER � 7 � NAME ^ Jti REMARKScc F w Q W Z Z W ADDRESS 333 NorNoYA J y CITY ZIP �<4, TELEPHONE NUMBER 361-a� NAME 8;RR I / ENGINEERIN MEM TED REVIEW BY cr U METER SI BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE No. OF FIXTURES ADDRESS , 31 F N , ­fi S a 3 CITY21 �/33 TELEPHONE NUMBER �9/ ��'OSK RE R STATE LICENSE NUMBER rn V o _ EXPIRATION DATE Y, SIGN AREA SEPA IEW ALL ED PRO E PLET EXEMPT Moro Legal Description of Property - include all easements Z ° F a w 0 J a w r �/ ( EXP Z Z a SHORELINE VARIANCE OR C"E'll P.�ING REVIEW BY TE y� V �t T G+ ! j �� S 3 V ETBACKS — FHEIGHT ONT Z y� "�� LOT C GE Property ��/ TeX ACCOunt ,. D ,,,, O t/ Parcel No. 7 ARKS NEW RESIDENTIAL M G ADDITION M COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL IL ®REMODEL APT.BLDG. IGN ECKED o% TYPE OF CONSTRU ODE FHEIGHT 21y SPECIAL INSPECTOR AR - OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REQUIRED GROUP LOAD 0 YES 0- F. o 110 GRADING FENCE REPAIR (_x_FT) DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL INSERT HOT TUB/SPA GARAGE RETAI G L/ CARPORT ROCKE RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVIT IN: I't 0- I j aM. / 1 i- NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS Z J m EMARKS PROGRESS INS NS PER US O5 FI L INSP TION REQ ED DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DON (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) l )4a (Pj�Rl 1q) UATION FEE PLA E J Q•�i,„J BUILDING - R G%� HEATS URIC GLAZING�� % ('f/, PLUMBING Plan Check No. 3 '. s_ MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) Will require separate permission. A STATE SURCHARGE I Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE N J successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, cc i o x employees, and agents. from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." �L�/C� O --- PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT •-..1-��i TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES This application is not a permit until ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is ti n Insurance. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGNATUR IOW OR E T) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT //) � CITY OF OFF I L'S SIGNATURE GATE C4 2- EDMONDS M bllal 3 ATTENTION CALL FOR ELEASED BY DATE INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor 10Y-87 NOi;,, Wes. Lj�L/ O PAge-O- Pb OF -Tp_,A,GT • %, MF�.DOWD�V.E Pc WA ro F1,,4.-r 'H07-le-c7p Vou4ME 5 OF pl,o.?4, ?p e,,S i5j5,- Or- 4HOHC--"K H 6.45PuNTY , kJP.sHIN/aTON. I ohlN�� VAN NORM I�� Pa1,M P�/>✓. 5. W sF 'T'1"�, ► A, Z7)8I vo OWW � 88P I :bTF.,rSw I N 'i'HIS D��A �I S I AoO rrION �(1 (fo�/EREA - - �-,0054; ve �T'As �f I r ECEIVED UN-2 E-C15'rIrka M--GI pIHC4,::- 'i"I�UE- rio2rt{ io•-,A�, -k- PERMIT EXPIRES I CITY OF EDMONDS USE ZONE C�3Q NUMBIER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. I v&C__ 0 � v w MAILING ADDRESS a /lam .L`�G Y�'1'I 1' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP y TESCP Approved / ❑ EXISTING A/ � REQUIRED DEDICATION RW Permit Required ,O/ Street Use Permit Req*okw CITY ZIP TELEPHONE � . Inspection Required Sidewalk Required4 ❑ ^/� V PROPOSED r, NA METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV R UIRED �� )� YES NO ❑ U t- Q 1�+ L w Z W ADDRESS c� fi r` A9 4P,2r-Jai REMARKS Ev�in/E�C level, //✓z Pezr-o S ,mac > CITY ZIP TELEPHONE C`YcUS e7 env / a ti . ✓/!%dS NAME /� j �/� 1\ i4 ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY /V,ar(a//// 2113141 U 0 ADDRESS /��J • / V i�i • FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BYul LL Q'• CITY ZIP � t�1�1'�9 Ir �` � (� {ram "" J TELEPHONE J �„ • / �(�Qj = v VARIANCE OR CU ADB# SHORELINE # STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECK D Y SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED • / r e" 0 '' �j EXPI04 ,I'`gO�POS€P Av {( 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTIO OF PROPERTY - INCLUDE ALL EASEMENTS O a LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) cc y ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR z 0 -� PROPERTY TAX ACIUNT P RCEL NO. lllV�/n LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEW BY DATE w -1 �igoo f /n• r/� ho ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH REMA KS COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE REMODEL ❑ APARTMENT ❑ SIGN OG•o r,, ,� FENCE REPAIR �S G CYOS ❑ ( X FT) CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT ❑ OTHER ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK I ` �v 1 GROUP z SPECIAL INSPECTOR � '�/VJ% CL'• T If �ARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL ❑ RENEWAL REQUIRED f-1 YES lJ Z CARPORT R Y (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAI REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 0 cc ` o NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS O STORIES UNITS NUMBER j DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE i2-6�oVA- ow ss- N TV tj &— Pr j J It a w�' INAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SOURCE _ N r U s GLAZING LOT.SLOOP; PLUMBING PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO F BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL CD 7 DOMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE t- SEPARATE PERMISSION. f STATE SURCHARGE , aPERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS DAYS SU PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 STORM DRAINAGE FEES to W "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE C/ U w J IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF ¢ EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND C ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY O FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT Z�lV b Q DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." ( TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT 1 ' INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHOF,LED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURAN AND RCW 16.27. SIGN RE (OWNER AGENT DATE SI NED (425) OFF A GNAT DATE 3 j 771-0220 RELE ED B'. D E ATTENTION / IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL-'Nt. vELLow- INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK - OWNER • GOLD - ASSESSOR SIRR `,7c. 1 g9- City of Edmonds PERMIT NO: 9335 SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT EXPIRES LI '� Address of Construction: le&20149 C27,V i4V . V v • LID # ` Property Tax Account Parcel No. 00 e % Attach copies of all access and utility easements Verified and Approved by Owner and/or Contractor: Contractor License #: Building Permit 10/sin le Famil Invasion into City *Right -of Way: ❑ Yes [(No g Y - ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units *RW Construction Permit # ❑ Commercial (No. of Units ) Cross other **Private Property: ❑ Yes No ❑ Public **Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement. - Ow_ ner/ ntractor Owner or contractor signature and acknowledgement statement: - Datif By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public handout entitled 69'ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. W CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-425-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION W FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extension329 i .,_ `/''1v` 24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS €<'F R.O. CE S 0 0 ... ................ . Permit Fee $ Repair Fee $ 101 Issued By: Trunk Charge $ Date Issued: t4 1 !_-4 O Assessment Fee $ Receipt No: 1 -7 City Permit Surcharge Fee $5.00 Total Fees Paid $ NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED. Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: 10 1:311 o I Initial:— As -built to Street File: ❑ `f� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE t- White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bl dgfonns;ssperrn itj lg4/00 DRIVEWAY W O 3.5' r, 15' = _� E - 9.5' t, 2' Deep 22' Bend 4' Deep �C/o 415, 6' Deep �. 5' Deep—/ of ED* CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS— BUILT o gyp'Scf ADDRESS: HOMEOWNER: ta 16010 70TH AVE W BURT LOCKHART CONTRACTOR: SCALE: NTS at 1890 DRAWN: 1 0/31 /01 BY: 1. ABILA NO. 9335 irU,V Uo U1 Ua:1,1p nelson&Sons Const (425)898-8508 p,2 11/05/01 18:43 FAX 208 322 1080 JMY FIILRS & CO. /��t /y�) / Q 001 City, of Edmonds Permit No: RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date. - A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: "loT}},AVF-- W. Mt7MaN175 WPr5$o26 B. Type ofWork (be spcclgc): jrj0tt A91 I+At.T tq-IVts 012- U.Es. iit.EG[!a{4Ay fpNIJVYT t'ipE To c.r•1-Lr �tor=M s�/w�►�-'�� �i+�IN lw s� pA-T+-t'tA•�sP��(�' C. Contractor: NEI.SOA)'} SOBl S „NST eo. Contact: TEA94 4VAIMSI( I �.. Mailing Address: Sg040 A( V� QL 9E.QfOM► wa,WA Phase: 47-6 - 113(o - cl900 � C G� �- 5/ State License #: �1 ELStX C tD t. 5K9�b3 q Liability Insurance:_y�_ Rond: S_ 4# 000. 00 L Z� •7 ( - q) L I D. Building Permit.# (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivislon ❑ City Pmjca ❑ EUC (PUV. VEW.0N, PSE, A1& T, OV W1 ❑ Multi -Family es-& Fondly ❑ Othar INSPECTOR- F. PAVEMENT CUP: ❑ YES NO G. 8I22 OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES NO INDEMNITY: Applicant understands by his/her signature to this applkattan he/she holds the Chy of admon& harmless ji•om 'Turf-, damages or claims of airy bard or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its deparimetar or employees indudtng bur nor limited to the defense of any legal proceedings tndadtng defense casts and attorney, fees by reason ofgranting this permit ME CONTRACTOR /S RBSPONSIRLB FOR )VORdM MUrP AND MEtIMALLS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL IALSPEMON AAW ACCBPTAN(K OF TM IYORL EffM7W R&S70RATI0N FEES WILL W U= ONM I= FINAL S7ttEt:T PATCH IS COMPLEMI) BY CITY FORCES, AT WAIQt'71MEA DEBIT OR CRIMIT RILL RE PROCd M POR USUANCTt 70 MAPPUCANT. ♦ Traffic control and public safety shall be in Accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every flogger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and taut have certification verifying completion of the required training In their possession. • Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. AU street -cut trench work she11 be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday - NO FXCEMON& • Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit appflentiom CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIR/sMENTSAND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE TAEPIN, PYOFTRE PERMITAVAMABLEONSI7E AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signatrtre /// 1 Dale: (Coo or or A¢ent) �T- T(me Au#)idrb*d '1tYata9`.? s0ci ti Ctiniit ' `Disruption FedFund If1: 'Restoration Fee: - •' Total' Fee: �' ' �• L� =;7llttceipt• No: ; :.:'Asueilby: UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Phone 425-771-0220, Ezt 1326) FINAL APPROVAL OP'PERM "ED WORK.* DATE: Impector s signotury For Inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout. oar hLA740 (A W To 742't" + /N4/Y kQ1e•leS —' G58.78 a -once cor. end. 0.19 20.14- Fence cor. end. I CYCLONE FENCE 0.03' Calc. Cor. per Del CaIc. N 88'54'43' E odjacenl owner.. Cor. 39.07 _ 1< �5f ' DETAIL )?orn vAv� 1 Fnd. LP co PFnd. 160TH - ST. 653.78'•.,v Luc �� 286.'10 AP)°1^�� 25. = • . �� �� .• N 9 28 _ —•p �4 ...._ N 88 19'51' E --- - ►t mi — -- — — S 87 � — 158.31' - . J4�• �' ..00 llsel 567•24'40' _ — .ON bUI-T v►J12�F- A5p�1--r No. 140 6 -56.95' Fnd. Robor I lop V \' (7121.VZ%� Reber bank- per Survey P�LT � e Cale. Car , per o4 ocenl owner by Western Surveyors 32.07 Sol Robar i Cap Inc. doled 6-12-09 34'43' Job No. 139-080-A •T —' 89.12' Colc. Fnd. Fence Ctw. 'cyclone' Car. S 0.37, Sol lto%ar w SEE E 035' t Cop v DETAIL N b iD �� l-�G`, to o Pl�NL O CALCULATED POINTS �o� MCr�-� • BASES UPON FIELD TIES OF EXISTING CORNERS. S 88'19'.49'-W 115.35' Sol. er A Cop p-- Fnd. 31 I.P. 0.4 t •. S 88.19*49� W Idlslurb• Z � l.69.33' w Sol Reber)• M io L Cap (AO (A _ Z 116.74' _ 86.41' �40.94' .. • f 5.: r�.�+a► �l cop �,. —..— Top Reber It Fnd. 314' I.P. -� Nr 88.19.497 E 09 A` 3/4' LP. •:;: 'y�"'}it' •�i::.. � : f :� ;':, ?�5:? ' +/," ! i Fivah 3/4' I.P. Erlalba �� �" , Erislin9 tr t - "SO"�6" 1_ V f _ r City of Edmonds Permit No: Fi Slop RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date: kL JO A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific):19-,� t� C,�4 N�MA &I- -oxwe i'oj% (4. 6Q< FLLretv�l e hr�, C.4 4Dv tf —no po 14.D. C. A Contractor: A"�I? s'n c Contact: � Ui Mailing Address: 5- (9 2, 1 0 m. mil 341WV Phone: State License #: t 9C�4. Y Liability Insurance@ ;¢ Bond: $ Building Permit # (if applicable): 420014VSide Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial '❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD) ❑ Multi -Family [Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: F. PAVEMENT CUT: ❑ YES ❑ O ���' SIZE OF CUT X CONCRETE CUT: ❑ YES u NO r INDEMNITY. Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any of its -departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Traffic control, and public safety shall bg in accordance with City regulations,as required by the City Engineer. Every flagger must be trained as required 'by; (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the required training in their possession. ♦ Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. .All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City - approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. ♦ Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING. WORK I HAVE READ THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT AVAILABLE ON SITE AT ALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS Signature: z1 f�-7 �5�t�l�� Date: ,,�6•.°" �� 1 (Contractor or Agent) FOR CITY USE ONLY Approved by:_ Time Authorized: Void After s / 1 ? / - Special Conditions: K ' iN Gttik")fif�S . Right-of-way Fee: Disruption Fee/Fund 111: Restoration Fee: Total Fee:� Receipt No: } Issued by: '4���� n!TV 3Z1) fJ P!VIS0V 111�"G13� X 1L!W) YWJ6 7t: A'2: flr �C��l. L. cif ..�7�`f�-�,i'1 r i7l>t�"L� UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEEUING FINAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 118.-00=OFT F , MONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (Pho a 425-771-022_xt. 1326 FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: /-A! 1 V IA—M, A DATEr ID OZ spe or's Signature For inspection requirements see Engineering Inspection Information handout. _ DA My Dgcuments\Forms\EngnmgURO permit_ doc +" ^ • i - e r 9.