Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16109 N MEADOWDALE RD.PDF
11111111111111 12371 16109 N MEADOWDALE RD ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE)_ 7c-2 COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS : 4,1 — l �� DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver AS tudy Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DA EASEMENT(S) RECORDED F PERMITS (OTH PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S)#: GEOTECH REPORT DATED STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: .9 LID #: LOT: BLOCK: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc 2s FOUNO/2" REBAR & CAP ¢8p. "G-4 INC 9435" ON P ROPERTY LINE FOUND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP / -300- "G-4 INC 9435" ELEVATION=295.6' _ �eM �ve/c�-Itncrn c,&A / j G'�n Y I f _ 20- Ss CLEARING LIMITS,/PYPICAL s� �� Moe.. j f\ _ h I FOUND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP "9891 " - _ \ \ `280� _ _ _ -� ELEVATION=281.7'. — GRAPHIC SCALE T E c n C -� �'a_� �� ^�'! \ ( IN FEET \ \ \ --270 � \ \ \ r ?80 1 inch = 20 & CONTOUR INTERVAL- 2 FOOT -250 \ .....r \�..... \ APN 00513>0000480,9 r` stiFO l7sF.. `fj`y -254 2 � , 'If°lro 0. er -2 \ Y l I S54 37'42"W Jr R 07. 9 A- 2•03' 21.40' Fi 1 Im FOUND 1 /2" REBAR & CAP "9891" 2.0' BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION=266.4' • a d = co i J, ...._ _.— SS E L 6 M E M 3. PI B) 4. BA cc SI- .l a RIC t' C3) S&EE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124, Redmond, Washington 98052, (425) 868-5868 FAX (425) 868-7427 August 16, 2007 Mrs. Kathryn Saldin C/O Mr. Ken Goff MAM Construction P.O. Box 91 Kent, WA 98035-0091 Proposed Saldin Residence 16109 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Dear Ken: Per your request, I have reviewed the city's (of Edmonds) August 14, 2007 plan review comments regarding ECDC 23.80.070A2. I have also reviewed the proposed development plan and performed evaluations regarding the potential hazards stated in the code. Based on my understanding of the soil conditions at the site and my evaluations, it is my opinion that the proposed development will not: a) increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; b) decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and c) adversely impact other critical areas. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our continuous services for the project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call. oS, AtOV• Zoo APPROVED By PI�NN N Sol Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President STREET FILE J1- / �-,o 17 RESUB AUG 2 0 2007 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS S6zEE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124, Redmond, Washington 98052, (425) 868-5868 FAX (425) 868-7427 June 7, 2007 Mrs. Kathryn Saldin C/O Mr. Ken Goff P.O. Box 91 Kent, WA 98035-0091 Report Critical Area Study Proposed Saldin Residence 16105 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Dear Ken: Per your request, I have prepared this Critical Area Study report for the above referenced project. This report is prepared in according to guidelines stated in Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Our company was retained by Mrs. Kathryn Saldin to perform a geotechnical investigation. The scope of this investigation includes site reconnaissance, excavation of 5 test pits and drilling of 3 hand auger borings; engineering evaluation regarding foundation support and slope stability. A report of which is dated September 30, 2006 and has been submitted previously. Since our report, the location of the proposed house was changed. Portions of the proposed house will be built over the lower portion of the onsite steep slope. As such, we have prepared a report addendum dated December 4, 2006 which has also been submitted to you previously. Erosion Hazard Based on our site exploration and Soil Conservation Survey (SCS), we believe that the site is covered by 1) Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes; and 2) Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loams, 25 to 70 percent slopes. According to SCS the erosion hazard for these soils are slight and high, respectively. The approximate regions of these soils are shown on the attached Figure 1. Landslide Hazard Based on our site exploration, we believe that the eastern portion of the site is located within a landslide hazard area. (See attached Figure 2). Our evaluation indicates that the potential of a deep-seated 614-Critical Area Study RESUB S&EE _ 5 1 JUN 29 2007 6UILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Mr. Ken Goff June 7, 2007 Page 2 of 3 movement of the slope is low, however, there is a potential of shallow sloughing especially during earthquake. The analyses also indicate that the potential unstable zone is within the upper 5 feet of the slope. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS Erosion Hazard I . We recommend that grading activities in the high erosion hazard are kept to a minimum. Any exposed area should be covered by visqueen before inclement rain storms or when the area is un- worked for 48 hours during October 1 through April 30, or un-worked for 7 days during May 1 through September 30. 2. Any slope face becomes bare for any reason should be re -vegetated immediately. During construction, site surface should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the structural areas. Standing water and runoff over any slope face should not be allowed. Landslide Hazard 1. To avoid loading of the existing steep slope by building foundations, the northeastern portion of the building should be supported on drilled piers. (see Figure 3 for location) The geotechnical design parameters for the piers are presented in our December 4, 2006 report addendum. Also, footings near any slope should be deepened so that the horizontal distance from the outside footing edge to the slope face is at least 10 feet. 2. The wall at the center of the house (see Figure 3 for location) should be designed to retain at least 6 feet of soil. This wall will function as a debris catchment wall should future sloughing from slope movement occur. Recommendations for the design of this wall are presented our December 4, 2006 report addendum. 3. Any excavation near the toe of the steep slope should be retained by a re -enforced concrete retaining wall. The lateral earth pressures for the design of such wall are presented in Section 5.6 of our September 30, 2006 geotechnical report. 4. All temporary excavation during construction should be 1.51-1: IV or flatter. All permanent slopes should be no steeper than 2H: I V. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanent slopes should be seeded with the appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and maintain the slope stability. 614-Critical Area Study S&EE Mr. Ken Goff June 7, 2007 Page 3 of 3 CONCLUSION The subject site is located in an area of erosion and landslide hazards. Based on our knowledge of the soil and groundwater conditions at the site, it is our opinion that the above mitigations are sufficient to avoid additional potential risk associated with the development. As we stated in our September 30, 2006 report, there is always an inherent risk of slope movement for any development near steep slopes. In addition to natural factors (soil, groundwater, heavy rainfall), other factors that may affect stability include excavations, fills, leaking or broken utility, improper drainage, lack of maintenance of drainage facilities or vegetation cover, unwise actions by adjacent property owners, or similar events or unknown conditions that may cause instability. Therefore, future property owners must be alert of any adverse impacts on the slope and take appropriate actions as needed. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our continuous services for the project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call. bf 1 .o 28166 TONAL �� ,Dwrtm--/Vov. 20ok Enclosures: Figures I to 3 Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President --Q7 614-Critical Area Study S&EE SE 1/4, SW 1/4, SECS, T. 27 N.. R. 4 E., W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON ELEVATION=295.6' 2,9 `_EXISTING 4' \ \`\^^ 3 TREES —30" '4'7' 9"., LATTIC \ \ 6'=6-. .EXISTING\\ — ^^ CANOPY _ TP EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE 0e, riy HELD FOR BOUNDARY Sj/ \ 4- C\ ^�� LINE PER INSTRUMENT 159 'cF /V 4 ^^ (Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loams, 25 to 70 percent slopes, high erosion hazard) /(Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, slight erosion hazard) \ CRAPHIC SCALE�so ^�\ ?6• ,L —^ \\ 22 mxm+°�.Iwvr,:no+ N � \\ A � \ • �\ 12-C�� > " S ROOF H.P.=26 9'��'�L,V/Q' \\ TP- \\ I \\ \\ \\A N 00513 0004802) 1 \\ \ 6._ EE cl r9 EXISTING 3 l,CWOOD 4 f 6/ ` & CAP "G-4 FENCE \ EXISTING 4' R/�' TP-? 24 136" ® I 13`I 554'3T42"W 21.40' 0.9' E. d0.5' N. WOOD FENCE �i � - ,245.6' „ 10' \ 6 6 EA. j - • I _^ t 2x20" 11` ' 16" 2 1�" \\ ^^ —\ \ .. • \\ W FO "91 1 TOP NUT =256.75' O \\ \ \\ `_ ELI L=272.9 4R477.69 _ _ ..... =J2'44'15 AfiV, DESCRIPTION REVISIONS lay DATE ./ PACIFIC GEOMATIC SEINC. O' W Sulll G a YNVWC SHEET TME:RNCES, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR DRAWN ev; mla cNEClcm ev: Ime gAA"� saunas TAX PARCEL N0.00513100004802 scAls: 1•-1a W. Gs :feln t sw, srt. sa PGS WC( MRRl �m-aam+�.ew CL�fT KATHRYN SALDAI DATE OB-01-3oG6 v 16109 N. MEADOWDALE ROAD loa nvMeex slreer EDMONDS, WA 98026 06-057-01 1 OF 1 Figure 1 SE 1/4. SW 1/4, SECS, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON ELEVATION=295.6' 24'A,k_' 1rZq _ _ (Area of Landslide Hazard) �;—�- 12" FOUND 1/2" REBAR k CAP -9891" ELEVATION =251.7' " XISTING 4' _ 3 TREES 30" -2 9". .1 \ a►` —LATTICE \ \ \ — — _— ... .EXISTING` CANOP .. ... 20" \ ----\\ i '`•. \ \5 TREES -- EES EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE o3• �Sl \ \ P-2 7Cil \ ` \ HELD FOR BOUNDARY LINE PER INSTRUMENT 1S'9 'cF C ` �� 4 TREES REC. NO. 1756182 a24 h'O \� \ \ �'6" '11 4 9� SSE �254— GRAPHIC SCALE `—�—� 2B' ` \ 22' F.F.-�L2 RO`0FFF HH.P..-269 9' �' C Z✓P5 \ \ TP_4 A N 005>3 0004 \ \ \.. 3E 78" 12" EXISTING 3'`\ ti C+99yrh \tI \Y0 lyta„ 1 / 24"--- _. \ WOOD FENCE \ 019, p I 78' \ I SY-�f�` TP-? I / a \ � \ \ 136" ® I t `\ 24' 13" S54'3T42"W REBAR h CAP "C-4 0 \ EXISTING 4' 8 \ \ I 1 \ '2 21.40' 0.9' E. & 0.5' N. %3 \�v WOOD FENCE \I L-19 47 \ R-507.P9 to=22'03'37" ,245.6' 12" s\ I �\ 18" l I 70'I \ Q b b EA. I .20'� 11" 18" 2 tb" \\ 25t I w FO \ _ \ 91 m\�L-.6`\TOP NU\=256.\5` \\\ \\\ 1 \\ ��\ _ ELI ERB L=272.94 R=477.69 dSI2'q T �_y_�jirs'1jA.'./-.�.t_./..��__/. �i._.-.4 ice" I REVISIONS � PACIflC CEOMATIC SERVICES. Trn. CES, INC. E: DRAWN BY:1nn+ CI®CKBDBY: wB E.'. RDEBCM"ION BY DATE —D lWVEYWG Y YAWu1G TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR wuMin gnna - aun s TAX PARCEL NO. 00513100004802 scA : 11V ROWnOns DATE: N41.1a06 m06 11M sTRELT ft. sm W. CLIENT: KATHRYN SALDIN PGS /NC h1OxL(�a]S)11E!-!�°S'OBIAI( 16109N.MEADOWDALEROAD JOB xusreER steer EDMONDS, WA 98026 06-057-01 1 OF I Figure 2 SE 1/4. SW 1/4, SECS, T: 27 N.. R.4 E., W,M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON 2p ELEVATION=295.6' pJ FOUND 1/2- REBAR h CAP '9891- ,\ ELEVATION-281.7' -_29 Support this portion of the —EXISTING ♦' \� � -� 6 TREES 30" �--- 9' building on drilled piers -LATTICE FENCE\\ \ '=H`'-- — \.EXISTING \--�Y \ CANOPY' 20" \\5 TREES — --- — la �• /B• •-\\� \6'-10, TREES 0--- \ \ \\� Design this wall to retain s -12 ---- B' �® at least six feet of soil 65. \ --- \ \ EXISTING 6' WOOD FENCE �' F-% ae J• �\ OF Oh \ \� -2 �J� \\ . \ \ \\ HELD FOR BOUNDARY Sl/ \ c4- cam\ �� \ 1S 9' m+NC a TREES \ LINE PER I INSTRUMENT h, \� � �.\ •_18" REC. N0. 1756182 i9 O(7S ,Zsi\ ��.0 \ \\ q GRAPMC SCALE / i?6v- F �\ \ 22 0. ""\��F. F.- az A \ c� ROOF H,P. 269 9' \ I \ \ \\A N 00513 0004802 I \ \ \ TP 1 \ / 1 \ \ 1 3VREES\ 1" \\ J \ \i18- a I F \ 1 I \ 1 3 TtLIE'f5 EXISTING 3' \ - ti ) �v W000 FENCE \ RC \ •. TP-? I O1\, 136. ® 1 ; --- 24. 1}' S54'37'42"W REBAR h CAP 'C-4 G \ EXISTING 4' 1 \ ��/~•Jl 2t.40' p WOOD FENCE \ I L-199147 \ R�07,P9 YYY��V 16=22'03'37' 2" 245.6' h 0.5' N. 7is\ I `\ 18" I 101 Q 7 \ 12 \ 25`t W FO _ 2x20" \ \ EA I` 11" — 19' 2x1�0� \ '91 _ \ m\LL.g i0P NU1=256.\5' O \\ \\ 1 \ �\ ELI L=272.94 R�77.69 d=32 -- '* REVISIONS �/ sneer m�e: O' PAC FlC CEOwAT C SERNCES, INC. o4www By: l a c m er; Kno TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR Desuvrwr+ ar DAM suwzs TAX PARCEL NO. 00513100D04802 lCMF �-"1O n sewt - acAmwc DAM 4 1-2— ua mrn srnar n. nc w. CLIENT: KATHRYN SALDW PCS /NC 16109 N. MEADOWDALE ROAD los nvMerx slreer EDMONDS, WA 98026 p6-057-0I I OF I Figure 3 WEE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124 Redmond Washington 98052 (425) 868-5868 FAX (425) 868-7427 December 4, 2006 Mrs. Kathryn Saldin C/O Mr. Ken Goff 29029 164 h Avenue SE Kent, WA 98042 Report Addendum Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Saldin Residence 16105 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Dear Ken: Per your request, I have reviewed our file and prepared this report addendum for the above referenced project. Our company was retained by Mrs. Kathryn Saldin to perform a geotechnical investigation. A report of which is dated September 30, 2006 and has been submitted previously. Since our report, the location of the proposed house has been changed. Portions of the proposed house will now be built over the lower portion of the onsite steep slope. Figure 1, which is included at the end of this report, shows the new house location. Cross -sections A -A and B-B are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. I have met with you onsite on November 10, 2006 to observe the site conditions and discuss the foundation support for the house. Based on our engineering evaluations, we believe that the proposed plan is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Our recommendations for the building support are presented below. FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that the northeastern portion of the house be supported by drilled piers (see Figure 1 for location), whereas the rest of the building be supported on conventional spread footings. DRILLED PIERS The piers should be reinforced concrete at least 18 inches in diameter and at least 20 feet in length below the ground surface. Based on our evaluations, these piers will have the capacities presented below. Vertical Capacities: The allowable downward capacity of the piers will be developed from a combination of end bearing and frictional resistance of the embedded portion of the shaft. We recommend that an average shaft friction resistance of 300 pounds per square feet (psf) and an allowable end bearing of 40,000 psf be used for the design. These values include a safety factor of 3.0. Lateral Load: Due to the presence of loose soil at the upper 5 feet of the slope, the pier should be designed to sustain an imbalance load at the upper 5 feet. (See Figure 4). This load can be estimated using an 614 Saldin Residence STREET FILE AFC i i 1�d, S&EE BUILDING DEFT. Mr. Ken Goff December 4, 2006 Page 2 of 4 equivalent fluid density of 50 pcf (pounds per cubic feet). Lateral Capacity: The lateral capacity of the pier can be calculated using the passive resistance less active pressure. (See Figure 4). Pier Installation: Drilled piers should be installed by an experienced contractor. .The contractor should prepare a clean out device that can remove all loose cutting at the bottom of the pier. Based on our test pit findings, we anticipate that caving may occur, especially in the upper 5 feet. As such, casing may be required for pier installation. Foundation Settlements: We anticipate that the settlement of the pier will be on the order of 1/4 inch. This settlement will be elastic in nature and occur as the loads are applied SPREAD FOOTING Spread footings should penetrate topsoil, and be founded on at least medium dense, native soils. Details of our recommendations regarding footing design are presented below. Bearing Capacity: We recommend an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square feet (psf for the design of the footings. This value includes a safety factor of at least 3, and can be increased by one- third for wind and seismic loads. Footing Construction: The footing bearing surfaces should be protected from weather and disturbance, and all organic, softened and loosened soils must be removed by over -excavation. Any over -excavation at the footing subgrade should be backfilled with concrete, lean concrete or structural fill. Please note that our test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils, which were placed in 2-foot thick lifts and compacted with the trackhoe bucket. If these test pits are located at the future footings, the upper 3 feet of the fill below the footing subgrade should be over -excavated The over -excavation should be backfilled with structural fill. All footing subgrade should be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer prior to re -bar and concrete placements. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the adjacent finished grade to provide protection against frost action, and should be at least 18 inches in width to facilitate construction. Settlement: Interior colunm footings designed in accordance with the above recommendations are expected to experience approximately 1/2 inch of settlement. Continuous wall footings should experience about.]/4 to 1/2 inch.- Differential settlement between adjacent footings is expected to be 1/4 to 1/2 of an inch. 614 Saldin Residence S&EE • 0 Mr. Ken Goff December 4, 2006 Page 3 of 4 Lateral Resistance: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing soil. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), and the latter using a coefficient of friction of 0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. Footing near Slopes: For any footings near slopes of 10 percent or steeper, the bottom of the footing must be positioned in such a way that the horizontal distance from the outside footing edge to the slope face is at least 10 feet. RETAINING WALL We recommend that the wall at the center of. the house (see Figure 1 for location) be designed to retain at least 6 feet of soil. This wall will function as a debris catchment wall should future sloughing from slope movement occur. Recommendations for the design of this wall are presented below. Lateral Load on Wall: An active pressure of 50 pounds per cubic feet (pcf) equivalent fluid density can be used for the design of the wall. Resistance to Lateral Load: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing soil. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pcf, and the latter using a coefficient of friction of 0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. The bottom of the retaining wall footing must be positioned in such a way that the horizontal distance from the outside footing edge to any nearby slope is at least 10 feet. Seismic -Induce Lateral Load: For seismic induced lateral loads, the dynamic force can be assumed to act at 0.6 H above the wall base and the magnitude can be calculated using the following equation: Pe = 3/8* r *HZ*a Where Pe = seismic -induced lateral load 7 = soil density = 130 pcf H = wall height a = horizontal acceleration, 0.15g Backfill in Front of Wall: Backfill in front of the wall should be structural fill. The material and compaction requirements are presented in Section 5.3 of our September 3, 2006 report. The density of the structural fill can be assumed to be 130 pounds per cubic feet. 614 Saldin Residence S&EE Mr. Ken Goff December 4, 2006 Page 4 of 4 Drainage behind Wall: Rigid, perforated drainpipes should be installed behind the retaining wall. Drainpipes should be at least 4 inches in diameter, covered by a layer of uniform size drain gravel of at least 12 inches in thickness, and be connected to a suitable discharge location. An adequate number of cleanouts should be installed along the drain line for future maintenance. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our continuous services for the project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call. 4" 28166 4 SIGNAL iWwEs: 110V. 2008 Enclosures: Figures 1 to 4 Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President / 2 -ez—c 6/ 614 Saldin Residence S&EE SE 1/4. SW 1/4, SECS, T. 27 N.. R_ 4 E., W.M. SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON zp ELEVATION-295.6' OS _ 12 6"( ` � \ 74- —SIB• ---,— 1�� = i FOUND 1/2^ REBAR k CAP "9891' r.ELEVATION-281.7' \28--- - - Support this portion of the -EXISTING 1\` ` 3 TREES - 30" � __ 9 building on drilled piers \'.� -LATTICE FENCE \\ \ \ — .EXISTING\ \ _ 20^ ` \ \5 TREES _ ... 1a TQ" _ Design this wall to retain \6^`t0' �\ TREES _-- � \ \\ s , =IE` at least six feet of soil E xISTIBOUNDARY� NG 6' WOOD FENCE F-I'/S �eJ•\\ C. 1\ \\ \� -2 \ HELD FOR BO UNDARY ,S9', /,tea/Nc �� \ ` 4. TREES \ N. LINE PER INSTRUMENT ?y tiO \\ ��- \-\ -IB" REG. NO. 1756182 9 \\\ �� S \ GRAPHIC SCALE lo Ia- O \ A \ \ F.F. \ \ r1 \ ^ 3 ROOF H.P.=259 9'\/>! N 00513 O0O4802) TP-aa \\\\\\\ "- \ I \ \ TP-1 \ I \VRE / \ 18" \ I \ \ I / 3 TREES t2^ CHgF+is.T \ l� � \'20. �4^ I // 24. 6.✓8, N EXISTING 3' \ 'f' �ti 1 7Kj i \ WOOD FENCE \ I / pRC I 18 \ I n'-'®` / \ 2a ,3 S54'37'42"W I \ _ \ EXISTING a' \ \ 3 \ \ 36^ 21.40' ' REBAR k CAP "G-a p \ \ \ I I �.����I g \ WOOD FENCE \I Lo195,a7 \ R�507.�9 10=22'03'37- 0.9' E. do 0.5� N. 7Q6, •2a5.6 '� \ / \ 12" \ \ 25\ I w 2x20" \ FO I I,_ .91 \ ELI ID\�L. STOP NUT=256.75` O \ L-7.63 Lm272.9a R-77.69 u' REVISIONS PACIFIC GEOUATIC SERVICES. INC. sxeet miz ou,vN er: lNu a�acm eY: Xn9 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR PmcRmloN]BY I DAn »a> TAX PARCEL NO. 005131 OD004802 scAtt I'-lo ww,n sma - aeA,na A. oaat•xoos mu„oa ewe n�>H sllerr n, m z• ` KATHRYN SALDIN PGS AVClOB'u'm sNPPT tmt >•.�s.m [•m1 16109 N. MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WA 98026 06 057.01, I OF I Figure 1 30( 29( W 27( 26 ),252 25 �771_ - - - - - - - J - - Tf t +t 4 4- El t "14 1 1 i t -1- - 1 J 44- ## r T --D .......... J I L A 7!� I__- 4- -T 4 1 L L . . . . . . . . - - - 7- Lj. +7' . . . . . . . . . . 4- L4-- 4 1.4 - ----- +4 4-4 4- + -4- J r_ r% cn 7n q n Qn u I u 4%j %J%j _W SECTION A -A Figure 2 300 r— QM= 280 270 ml = 250'-- j a LL, L, -7 10 20 30 40 1 1 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 12, SECTION B-B Figure 3 LI 150D psf 50 (5+H) psf B (Passive Pressure) (Active Pressure) Notes: 1. Piers should be designed to sustain an imbalance lateral load at the top 5 feet. 2. Active and passive pressures will act over one pier diameter. 3. Passive pressure includes a safety factor of 1.5. 4. Minimum embedment 5+H = 20 feet 5. Allowable vertical pier capacity: Skin Friction = 300 psf, End Bearing = 40,000 psf S&EE Job no. 614 I 614rpt STREET FILE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SALDIN RESIDENCE 16105 NORTH MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON S&EE JOB NO. 614 SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 Aa sC 1 ?.,vd.l Jii i}lr OEPT. S& EE S&EE SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. 16625 Redmond Way, Suite M 124, Redmond, Washington 98052, (425) 868-5868 FAX (425) 868-7427 September 30, 2006 Mrs. Kathryn Saldin 16109 N. Meadowdale Rd. Edmonds, WA 98026 Report Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Saldin Residence 16105 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Dear Kathryn: We are pleased to present herewith our Report of Geotechnical Investigation for the referenced project. Our services were authorized by Mr. Steve Miles on April 3, 2006, and have been provided in accordance with our proposal dated March 24, 2006. We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services. Should you have any question regarding the contents of this report or require additional information, please call. Very truly yours, SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. C. J. Shin, Ph.D., P.E. President 614rpt S & EE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... I 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES................................................................................................................................ i 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS.................................................:......................................................................... 2 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS.................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF SLOPE STABELTY.......................................................................... 3 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................... 4 5.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................................................. 4 5.2 SLOPE PROTECTION................................................................................................................................ 5 5.2.1 DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL................................................................................................. 5 5.2.2 GRADING NEAR STEEP SLOPE............................................................................................................ 5 5.2.3 FOOTING NEAR SLOPE......................................................................................................................... 5 5.3 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL...................................................................................... 6 5.4 FOUNDATION SUPPORT.......................................................................................................................... 7 5.5 SLAB SUPPORT......................................................................................................................................... 8 5.6 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES................................................................................................................ 8 5.7 ROCKERY WALLS.................................................................................................................................. 10 5.8 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT........................................................................................................................... 11 5.9 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................................. 11 5.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES...................................................................................................................... 11 6.0 LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................................................ 12 FIGURE l: SITE VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2: SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN FIGURE 3: SURCHARGE LOADS ON SUBSURFACE WALLS APPENDIX A: FIELD EXPLORATION LOGS AND KEY 614rpt i SB•z EE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SALDIN RESIDENCE 16105 NORTH MEADOWDALE ROAD EDMONDS, WASHINGTON for Ms. Kathryn Saldin 1.0 INTRODUCTION We present in this report the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed residential development. The site (APN 00513100004802) is about 19,000 square feet in size and is located on the north side of North Meadowdale Road, in Edmonds, Washington. A site vicinity map is included in Figure 1, and a site plan is shown in Figure 2, both included at the end of this report. We understand that the Proposed development will involve a new house in the southern portion of the lot. This area is currently vacant and is located to the south of the existing house. At the time of this report, the building and grading plans are not available. We understand that a new access road will be constructed at the south end of the site. We anticipate that the maximum cut and fill for the development will be'less than 10 feet. For the purpose of this study, we have assumed that the structural load of the house will be typical of single-farnily homes. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our geotechnical investigation is to develop geotechnical recommendations regarding site preparation and foundation support. Specifically, our services included: Site reconnaissance to observe surface conditions including obvious signs of slope instability and wet and unstable soils. 2. Exploration of the soil and groundwater conditions underlying the site through the excavation of 5 test pits, TP-1 through TP-5 and the drilling of 3 hand auger borings, HA-1 through HA-3. The approximated exploration locations are shown on Figure 2. Details of the exploration program and the logs of explorations are presented in Appendix A of this report. 614rpt S& EE 0 • 3. Recommendations regarding foundation support. 4. Recommendations regarding the construction of the new access road. 5. Recomi-nendations regarding seismic design. 6. Evaluation of the stability of the onsite slopes, recommendation regarding mitigations, if needed 7. Recommendations regarding active and at -rest earth pressures to be used for the design of any retaining structures. 8. Recommendations regarding site preparation, including removal of unsuitable soils, suitability of onsite soils for use as fill, fill placement techniques, and compaction criteria. 9. Five copies of this written geotechnical report containing a site plan, exploration logs, a description of subsurface conditions, and our findings and recommendations. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is bordered to the west by North Meadowdale Road, to the north and south by single-family residences, and to the east by a steep slope (over 40 % in inclination). This slope ascends eastward at about 20% in the western portion of the proposed building lot, and steepens to about 50% in the eastern portion of the lot. The slope continues eastward at about 50% to 75% inclination. A flat area with residences is present at the top of the slope. The height of the slope is about 100 feet from the east side of the project site to the top of the slope. The elevation relief across the site is about 40 feet. At the time of our field exploration, the slope is covered with dense trees and thick undergrowths. The slope face in the project site vicinity is relatively uniform That is, there are no hummocky terrains and no erosion channels. We did not observed any signs of obvious slope instability which typically include slumps, cracks or fissures in the ground, wet and unstable soils, and springs. However, a few trees are bending at the bottom of their trunks. This implies that creeping of localized loose soils has occurred. 614rpt 2 S8:: EE 3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The soil conditions underlying the site were explored by the excavation of 5 test pits and the drilling of 3 hand auger borings on June 7, 2006. These explorations indicate that the site, including the slope to the east, is covered by approximately 6 to 18 inches of topsoil and underlain by sand The sand is typically loose to medium dense in the upper 2 to 4 feet and becomes medium dense to dense thereafter. Localized gravel zones were encountered at depths of 8.5 to 13 feet in test pits TP-2 and TP-3. Groundwater was not encountered in any exploratory holes. 4.0 ENGINEERING EVALUATION OF SLOPE STABILTY Based on our understanding of the subsurface conditions underlying the site and slope, and our estimate of the soil parameters, we have evaluated the stability of the slope using the computer program STABL5M. The analyses consider both steady state and dynamic loading conditions. The latter included an earthquake producing a ground acceleration of 0.15g which would represent an earthquake magnitude (M) of about 6.0 to 7.0. The information obtained from the slope stability analyses includes safety factors against shallow, surficial sloughing and deep-seated slope movement. The standard engineering practice considers a slope to be acceptably stable if it demonstrates factors of safety of at least 1.5 and 1.1 for static and dynamic loading conditions, respectively. A factor of safety is defined as the summation of resisting forces divided by the suannation of driving forces. 614rpt 3 S8: EE The following table presents the results of our slope stability analyses for the project. Factor of Safety Type of Slope Movement Steady -State Dynamic (Earthquake) Deep -Seated 1.5 1.1 Shallow Sloughing 1.2 1.0 These results indicate that the potential of a deep-seated movement of the steep slope is low, and there is a potential of shallow sloughing especially during earthquake. The analyses also indicate that the potential unstable zone is within the upper 5 feet of the slope. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL i Our explorations indicate that the site area is underlain by competent native soils. Except for the shallow loose soil on the slope, the steep slope on and to the east of the r is current stable. Based on our oP eP oP property � currently evaluation, the proposed development will not change the state of the slope stability provided that the recommendations presented in this report are followed _ ^ The shallow sloughing can result in some movement of loose, surficial soil from the steep slope to the flatter, lower area where the proposed building is located. As the slope face is relatively uniform, we believe the potential of concentrated soil movement such as mud or debris flow is low. To prevent impact of large particles such as large gravel or cobbles from rolling down the hillside and hitting the house, a debris catchment wall can be considered. The wall is typically a re -enforced concrete retaining wall of about 4 to 6 feet in height. Please be aware that there is always an inherent risk of slope movement for any development near steep slopes. In addition to natural factors (soil, groundwater, heavy rainfall), other factors that may affect stability include excavations, fills, leaking or broken utility, improper drainage, lack of maintenance of i drainage facilities or vegetation cover, unwise actions by adjacent property owners, or similar events or unknown conditions that may cause instability. Therefore, future property owners must be alert of any adverse impacts on the slope. 614rpc 4 SSz EE 5.2 SLOPE PROTECTION 5.2.1 DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The existing vegetation on the steep slopes (including the slopes onsite and the continuous slope eastward from the site) is the key for the slope stability. Any slope face becomes bare for any reason should be re - vegetated immediately. During construction, site surface should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the structural areas. Standing water and runoff over any slope face should not be allowed. Final site grades should be sloped away from buildings unless the area is paved. 5.2.2 GRADING NEAR STEEP SLOPE Excavation near the bottom of a steep slope will reduce the resisting force (against sliding) and decrease slope stability. Therefore, excavation in the eastern portion of the building lot, where the toe of the steep slope is present, should be avoided unless a re -enforced concrete retaining wall is constructed. The lateral earth pressures for the design of such wall are presented in Section 5.6 of this report. All temporary excavation during construction should be 1.51-1:1 V or flatter. All permanent slopes should be no steeper than 2H:1 V. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanent slopes should be seeded with the appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and maintain the slope stability. 5.2.3 FOOTING NEAR SLOPE To avoid loading of the existing slope by building foundations, footings near any slope should be deepened so that the horizontal distance from the outside footing edge to the slope face is at least 10 feet. 614rpt 5 S&z EE 5.3 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL Site preparation should begin with stripping vegetation and topsoil of the structural areas including driveway, building and slabs. The slab or driveway subgrades should be thoroughly proof -rolled using heavy construction equipment. If proof rolling is not feasible due to wet condition, the area should be probed using a steel bar so as to avoid disturbance and rutting of the subgrade soils. Areas which are found to be loose or soft, or which contain organic soils should be over -excavated. A qualified geotechnical engineer should conduct the proof -rolling and/or probing to assist in identifying loose soils and evaluating the over -excavation requirements. After stripping, over -excavation and excavation to the design grade, the top 12 inches of the native soils should be re -compacted to at least 92% of their maximum dry density as determined using ASTM D-1557 test procedures (Modified Proctor test). Structural fill can then be placed in the over -excavation and fill areas. The structural fill materials should meet both the material and compaction requirements presented below. Material Requirements: Structural fill should be free of organic and frozen material and should consist of hard durable particles, such as sand, gravel, or quarry -processed stone. The on -site sand is suitable for use as structural fill. Suitable imported structural fill materials include sand and gravel (pitrun), and crushed rock. Placement and Compaction Requirements: Structural fill should be placed in loose horizontal lifts not exceeding a thickness of 6 to 12 inches, depending on the material type, compaction equipment, and number of passes made by the equipment. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined using the ASTM D-155.7 test procedures. 614fpt 6 S& FEE 0 •. 5.4 FOUNDATION SUPPORT The proposed house and all retaining walls can be supported by conventional spread footings which should penetrate topsoil, and be founded on at least medium dense, native soils. Details of our recommendations regarding the foundation design are presented in the following sections. Bearing Capacity: We recommend an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square feet (psf) for the design of the footings. This value includes a safety factor of at least 3, and can be increased by one- third for wind and seismic loads. Footing Construction: The footing bearing surfaces should be protected from weather and disturbance, and all organic, softened and loosened soils must be removed by over -excavation. Any over -excavation at the footing subgrade should be backfilled with concrete, lean concrete or structural fill. Please note that our test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils, which were placed in 2-foot thick lifts and compacted with the trackhoe bucket. If these test pits are located at the future footings, the upper 3 feet of the fill below the footing subgrade should be over -excavated The over -excavation should be backfilled with structural fill. All footing subgrade should be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer prior to re -bar and concrete placements. All exterior footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the adjacent finished grade to provide protection against frost action, and should be at least 18 inches in width to facilitate construction. Settlement: Interior column footings designed in accordance with the above recommendations are expected to experience approximately 1/2 inch of settlement. Continuous wall footings should experience about 1A to 1/2 inch. Differential settlement between adjacent footings is expected to be 1/4 to 1/2 of an inch. Lateral Resistance: Lateral resistance can be obtained from the passive earth pressure against the footing sides and the friction at the contact of the footing bottom and bearing soil. The former can be obtained using an equivalent fluid density of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pco, and the latter using a coefficient of friction of 0.5. These values include a safety factor of 1.5. 614rpt 7 SgzEE 5.5 SLAB SUPPORT All slabs -on -grade can be supported on structural fill or at least medium dense native soils. We envision that the soil at the slab subgrade will be disturbed and loosened by construction activities at the time of slab construction. We therefore recommend that the slab subgrade be proof -rolled or probed. Any wet and loose areas should be over -excavated and backfilled with structural fill. In order to promote uniform support and provide a capillary break, we recommend that slabs be underlain by a 6 mil. vapor barrier over a 4-inch thick layer of free draining gravel. 5.6 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Lateral earth pressures on retaining walls or permanent subsurface walls, and resistance to lateral loads may be estimated using the following recommended soil parameters: Note: Hydrostatic pressures are not included in the above lateral earth pressures. The active case applies to walls that are permitted to rotate or translate away from the retained soil by approximately 0.002H, where H is the height of the wall. This would be appropriate for a cantilever retaining wall. The at -rest case applies to unyielding walls, and would be appropriate for walls that are structurally restrained from lateral deflection such as basement walls, utility trenches and pits. SURCHARGE INDUCED LATERAL LOADS 1) Additional lateral earth pressures will result from surcharge loads from floor slabs or 614rpt 8 SS zXE • 0 pavements for parking that are located immediately adjacent to the walls. The surcharge - induced lateral earth pressures are uniform over the depth of the wall. Surcharge -induced lateral pressures for the "active" case may be calculated by multiplying the applied vertical pressure (in psf) by the active earth pressure coefficient (Ka). The value of Ka may be taken as 0.3. The surcharge -induced lateral pressures for the "at -rest" case are similarly calculated using an at -rest earth pressure coefficient (Ko) of 0.5. For surcharge loads that are not adjacent to the wall, the induced lateral earth pressure will depend on the magnitude of the surcharge and the distance from the wall. Such induced lateral load can be estimated using the equations shown on Figure 3. 2) The traffic -induced lateral earth pressure can be accounted for by increasing the effective wall height by 2 feet. SEISMIC INDUCED LATERAL LOADS For seismic induced lateral loads, the dynamic force can be assumed to act at 0.6 H above the wall base and the magnitude can be calculated using the following equation: i Pe = 3/8* 7 *HZ*a Where Pe = seismic -induced lateral load r = soil density = 130 pcf H = wall height a = horizontal acceleration, 0.15g BACKFILL IN FRONT OF RETAINING WALLS Backfill in front of the wall should be structural fill. The material and compaction requirements are presented in Section 5.3 of this report. The density of the structural fill can be assumed to be 130 pounds per cubic feet. BACKFILL BEHIND RETAINING WALLS Backfill behind the wall should be free -draining materials which are typically granular soils containislg less than 5 % fines (silt and clay particles) and no particles greater than 4 inches in diameter. The 614rpt 9 S & EE rnajority of the onsite sand is suitable for this purpose. Some sand in the upper 4 feet may contain over 5 % and should be avoided. The backfill material should be placed in 6 to 8-inch thick horizontal lifts and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in accordance with ASTM D-1557 test procedures. In the areas where the fill will support pavement, sidewalk or slabs, the top two feet of the backfdl should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density. Care must be taken when compacting backfill adjacent to retaining walls, to avoid creating excessive pressure on the wall. DRAINAGE BEHIND RETAINING WALLS Rigid, perforated drainpipes should be installed behind retaining walls. Drainpipes should be at least 4 inches in diameter, covered by a layer of uniform size drain gravel of at least 12 inches in thickness, and be connected to a suitable discharge location. An adequate number of cleanouts should be installed along the drain line for future maintenance. 5.7 ROCKERY WALLS In addition to concrete retaining walls, reinforced or non -reinforced rockery walls can be considered for grading purposes. Please note that rockery walls should be designed by a geotechnical engineer for the following conditions: 1. The wall will be used to retain fill embankment that is over 4 feet in height. 2. The wall will retain a cut embankment greater than 6 feet in height. The design should consider the slope behind the wall, the wall height, the surcharge load behind the wall, and the strength of the reinforcing material (if required). We will be glad to perform this design, if requested 614rpt 10 S& EE 5.8 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT We recommend that the subgrade for flexible pavement be prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 5.6 SITE PREPARATION AND STRUCTURAL FILL. Based on the subsoil conditions, we believe that the prepared subgrade will have a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of at least 12. For the proposed access road, we recommend a pavement section consisting of 2 inches asphaltic concrete over 4 inches base course. The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-1557 test method. The material should meet WSDOT aggregate specification 9-03.9(3) and have the following gradation: Sieve Size Percent Passing 1 1/4-inch 100 5/8-inch 50-80 1/4-inch 30-50 US No. 40 3-18 US No. 200 7.5 max. % Fracture 75 min. 5.9 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS We recommend that Site Class D as defined in the 2003 IBC be considered for the building design. The site is underlain by dense soils. As such, the liquefaction potential is negligible. 5.10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services may be required during the design and construction of the project. We envision that these additional services may include the following: 1. Review of design plans. 614rpt 11 S& EE 0 7� 2. Provision of construction monitoring services. The tasks of our monitoring service typically include the followings: 2.1 Monitoring of temporary excavations. 2.2 Monitoring of spread footing subgrade preparation. Our representative will confirm the bearing capacity of the subgrade soils, and will assist the contractor in evaluating the over - excavation requirements, if any. 2.3 Monitoring the placement and compaction of structural fill. Our representative will confirm the suitability of the fill materials, perform field density tests, and assist the contractor in meeting the compaction requirements. 2.4 Monitoring the installation of subsurface drains. Our representative will confirm that these drains are installed in accordance with our recommendations. 3. Other geotechnical issues deemed necessary. 6.0 LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are provided for design purposes and are based on soil conditions disclosed by field observations and subsurface explorations. Subsurface information presented herein does not constitute a direct or implied warranty that the soil conditions between exploration locations can be directly interpolated or extrapolated or that subsurface conditions and soil variations different from Chose disclosed by the explorations will not be revealed. The recommendations outlined in this report are based on the assumption that the development plan is consistent with the description provided in this report. If the development plan is changed or subsurface conditions different from those disclosed by the exploration are observed during construction, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions, and if necessary, reconsider our design recommendations. 614rpt 12 SS=EE PUGET SOUND Sl TE S&EE Job no. 614 PANE FIR, Figure Site Location Nt Proposed Saldin- Residen, MC tC WOOD FENCE FOR BOUNDARY IER INSTRUMENT 10. 17361e2—ate .ti oL �� tttDOD FENCE \, a 00 IL � ��� rwom Fo= FOUND t/r "am a CAP V-4McMWa pwaly IK Z NA-2 AIIL"AAW TR Cr M RA: M OS21909 3�.=X6470 CAP nLVA11011�aiee' 9 60 HA-3 /,1 60 HA-1 • MrAt/'2° T7"- a GP 9tee1• ntevA,toN•2sl.r TP- RqOF N�.z AP1V 00 18f0000�802 \ 11 � ! r TP-4 for i I TP-1 -M- l s` E s'•vttEF�� �' TP-; 1` 24- 3e ts• sba7T42'1F 21.4Oi L.tei47 R�07.�10 &W*y37- . _ ''� __.► . i toy (Not -To -Scale) SD f7 Ss -- i �_—! rf L•a7z_e4 a-4n ee J SD ss `� �. 44'fa'J SS '� ! per %uR%f r J .•e la TY OF EwMqSD TP-1: Test pit number and approximate location Figure 2 Reference:: Topographic Survey, dated 8-1-2006 and Site and Fxploradon Plan S&EE 614 HA-1: Hand anger number and approximate location prepared by Pacific Geomatic Srevices, Inc. SaldinResidence, Edmonds, WA 4 0.2 04 N c u_ 0.6 W J Q Q8 rzr: .�1■MENEENEwag .2 .4 .6 .8 VALUE OF 0-H (k) LINE LOAD QL X=mH FORM <0.4: = TH (�)° Z=nH PH= 0.550L FOR M)0.4: H R vH %-QL—I(m2+.n2)2 V4—I RESULTANT PH= 0.240L (m +I ) PRESSURES FROM LINE LOAD OL (BOUSSINESO EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Reference•; Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2, Department of the Navy, May 1982 .IR. rO4 V A. Ion". "q I NNEN�DINPPAIOA a I I I NEREPAP NEENMEM! MENNUMM WOnNEENES�i • I Z=nH LL H .5 1.0 2 1.5 VALUE OF �H ( H2 I M<0.4: 0 28n2 ') (Q164-n )� . V.t (H2 )- 1.77m2n2 H Qp (m2+-n2)3 CH =9HCOS2(1.10) �H _ a 8, 3 �H X=MH SECTION A -A PRESSURES FROM POINT LOAD Op (BOUSSINESQ EQUATION MODIFIED BY EXPERIMENT) Calculation of Surcharge Loads on Subsurface Walls Figure 3 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LOGS The subsurface conditions at the project site were investigated by the excavation of 5 test pits and the drilling of 3 hand auger borings on June 7, 2006. The pits were excavated to depths of 10 to 13 feet using a trackhoe. The hand auger borings were drilled to depths of 7 to 13.5 feet using a 3-inch diameter hand auger. The drilling was performed by a worker hired by Mr. Steve Miles. A representative of S&EE was present throughout the exploration to observe the exploration, obtain soil samples, and log the subsurface soil conditions. The exploratory logs are presented in this appendix. A chart showing the Unified Soil Classification System is included at the end of this appendix. Test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils, which were placed in 2-foot thick lifts and compacted with the trackhoe bucket. If these test pits are located at the future footings, the upper 3 feet of the fill below the footing subgrade should be over -excavated. The over -excavation should be backfilled with structural fill. 614rpt SgzEE v d TEST PIT TP-1 m a U a w a ;; co c c a `cO COO j Soil Description III SM Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) III III sP Brown fine to medium sand with trace fine gravel and little silt (moist)(loose) Sp Gray medium to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel (moist)(dense) 6 10 - damp below 10 feet Test pit completed at a depth of 12 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during excavation. 16 ------------------------ Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Excavation Method: Track mounted excavator Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 254 feet Figure A-1 S &EE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No. 614 v >v m E m WO m 4 4 iao O Q; � rn 4 v O d d 3 rt Co c; Q E N W U j Soil Description — 0 III III III SM Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) Brown fine to medium sand with trace fine gravel and little silt (moist)(loose to medium dense) TEST PIT TP-2 Grayish brown fine to medium sand with trace fine gravel (moist)(medium dense to dense) - more gravel below 8 feet k�; GP Grayish brown fine to medium gravel with some fine to medium sand �` (moist)(medium dense to dense) 10 Test pit completed at a depth of 10 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during excavation. 15------------------------- ----.. Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Excavation Method: Track mounted excavator Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 264 feet Figure A-2 SUE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No.614 >b aci o 4 m 1; C m C U O ao S c ( j Soil Description _ i Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) Brown fine to medium sand (moist)(loose to medium dense) Gray fine to coarse sand with trace fine gravel (moist)(dense) TEST PIT TP-3 10 GP Gray fine to medium gravel with trace sand and coarse gravel (moist)(dense) Test pit completed at a depth of 13 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during excavation. 15 ----------------- ------ Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Excavation Method: Track mounted excavator Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 271 feet Figu re A-3 S&EE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No. 614 TEST PIT TP-4 a 3 mm 4 V o a) e c 0 j Soil Description III sM Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) sP Brown fine sand with trace fine to medium gravel and trace silt (dry)(loose) sP Grayish brown fine sand with trace fine to medium gravel and trace sift (moist)(loose to medium dense) 6 Graymedium to coarse sand with fine to medium gravel (moist)(dense) 10 Test pit completed at a depth of 13 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during excavation. 16 - - ------------- Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Excavation Method: Track mounted excavator Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 265 feet Figure A-4 SUE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No. 614 • v �l TEST PIT TP-5 c io o 1 O Co S i CO j Soil Description 0 III sM Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) sP Brown fine sand with trace fine to medium gravel and trace silt (dry)(loose to medium dense) Grayish brown fine to medium sand with trace silt and few fine gravel (moist)(medium dense) SP Gray fine to coarse sand with fine to coarse gravel and few cobbles (moist)(dense) 6 10 Test pit completed at a depth of 12 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during excavation. 16-------------------------- Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Excavation Method: Track mounted excavator Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 260 feet Figure A-5 SUE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No.614 m iu o a Hand Auger Boring HA-1 4 4 � o VC � 1; U p av c� iq j Soil Description snn Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) sP Brown fine to medium sand with trace silt (moist)(loose) 6 10 . 16 ----------- --- -- sP Grayish brown fine to medium sand with trace silt and few fine gravel (moist)(medium dense) - more gravel below 5 feet Graymedium to coarse sand (moist)(dense) Boring completed at a depth of 13 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during drilling. Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Exploration Method: 3-inch diameter hand auger Expiation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 286 feet (approximated) Figure A-6 S BEE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No.614 • v m c m E a 1 O 3 a0 'ir a�i dm a c c C-0 —0 0 U j Soil Description sM I Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) Hand Auger Boring HA-2 Brown fine sand with fine to medium gravel and trace silt (moist)(loose to medium dense) r 6 ` sP Mr Grayish brown fine sand with fine to coarse gravel (moist)(medium dense) Auger refused on coarse gravel at a depth of 7 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during drilling. 10 1b----------- ----- ------ Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Exploration Method: 3-inch diameter hand auger Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 346 feet (approximated) Figure A-7 SUE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No.614 m Hand Auger Boring HA-3 C� 3 O cc � < in U j Soil Description SM Brown silty fine sand with roots (topsoil) WIWJ—sp—i Brown fine sand with fine to medium gravel and trace silt (moist)(loose) sP Grayish brown fine sand with fine gravel and trace silt (moist)(medium dense) 6 10; SP Gray fine to medium sand with trace fine gravel (moist)(medium dense to dense) Boring completed at a depth of 13.5 feet on 6-7-2006. No seepage encountered no caving occured during drilling. 16 ------------------ ------ Client: Ms. Kathryn Saldin Exploration Method: 3-inch diameter hand auger Excavation Date: June 7, 2006 Ground Elevation: 316 feet (approximated) Figure A-8 S&EE Proposed Saldin Residence Job No. 614 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM J Q Lu DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS N � O GW WELL -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, CLEAN O LITTLE OR NO FINES GRAVELS (LITTLE OR U) z °- T •, , GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL -SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES NO FINES) U j = Q Q � N Q ="~>-�' J rn w U) am GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -SILT GRAVELS MIXTURES WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE Of (n w"' o uja-' d o o� w z 20 -� H p w �,-' Z o o GC CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL -SAND -CLAY MIXTURES AMOUNT OF FINES) W O N d svv WELL -GRADED SAND OR GRAVELLY SANDS, CLEAN F z 0 = LITTLE OR NO FINES SANDS (LITTLE OR -,� o °zo -Q < � Z > a ( <� _ x � W w $ P POORLY -GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES NO FINES) w = a a N a Za�mw w ZQ w w w § a � o Q o o O 23 ma V al Lu SM SILTY SANDS, SAND -SILT MIXTURES SANDS WITH FINES (APPRECIABLE sir sw 28. LL' vjw SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND -CLAY MIXTURES AMOUNT OF FINES) ML INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY OR <in 5 CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY SILTS & CLAYS fqw NU "J a—i w CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS, LEAN CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50 O in _� g f- `sca _ _ -- ORGANIC OL SILTS AND ORGANIC SILT -CLAYS OF LOW p � g z PLASTICITY w Z 0O S� MH INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE Z SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS � SILTS &CLAYS s x W � w CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT GREATER THAN 50 Z L p u- Z y OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTS PT PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS DE PTH OF GROUNDWATER DURING EXCAVATION SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND KEY TO TEST P 1 T LOG S&EE 0 PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 11 STREET FILE Name: Date: Site Address: m p t 0 ,' / V . MeAo(owo4lG A;r- Plan Check # : 0� Project Description: y� Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES / NO) Zoning: ._ Map Page: =� 1 Corner Lot: (YE, Flag Lot: (YES <9 Critical Areas Determination #: 200S--01'70 Study Required ❑ waiver SEPA Determination: Exempt I�ds ❑ Needed (for over 50 is yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Required Setbacks Street: / Side: Side: I D 35 Rear: i A ffbal Setbacks Street: Side: / lit / I Side: / Rear: Q 2 I/ Detached Structures:-o I'�2w.o✓�o� , Rockeries: 1 $P 19"l�S ' ck —slo pC� ��o-�3 ��Ts� — ❑ Fences/Trellises: 1 , i 5 �' dulation — z 73 ¢/ Stairs/Deck: lily Bulldin Height Datum Point: ge�biv✓ �i Datum Elevation: 26 &. q / Maximum Height Allowed: Zjr 2�� (oZ� Actual Height: 2 y 37S � 2 Other Parking Required: Z Parking Provided: Z Lot Area: 19�-(OQ Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: �� o s Lot Coverage Calculations: ZD ((Q -+— ADU Created: (YES NO) Subdivision: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / NO) Comments M s+ laana( Y-er-►-,ora4 o f oc ► s-h r� 1/es ►dance . fie.. -no of ex,t-sfi ►-escaG�«-r�`c�-1- 6xc !�%e.� ISce, Of �Pi/ 4t, OCGI%PA Plan Review By:� PtanMng Data Forth 04-11-06.doc OF EDP CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 i STATUS: ISSUEDPermit .s - � yyi < ro°v 9/13/2007 sa 4Y F� i n' ? 3{%Y vj� t�, "!r Expiration Date: 9/13/2008 Parcel No: 00513100004802 PRAPPLICANT OPERT)'OWNERO. KATHRYN SALDIN MAM CONSTRUCTION MAM CONSTRUCTION 16109 N MEADOW DALE RD PO BOX 91 PO BOX 91 EDMONDS, WA 98026 KENT, WA 98035 KENT, WA 98035 425-745-9843 253-854-7022 253-854-7022 LICENSE #: MAMCO'•095L4 EXP:6/16/2007 i DESCRIPTION SFR VALUATION: $274,277 PERMIT TYPE: Residential PERMIT GROUP: 64 - Single Family Residence New GRADING. Y CYDS. 150 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: Y OCCUPANT GROUP: R3 OCCUPANT LOAD: FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: 2003 OTHER: N------- OTHER DESC: ZONE: RS-20 NUMBER OF STORIES: 2 VESTED DATE: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 EXISTING AREA BASEMENT: 0 1ST FLOOR. 0 2ND FLOOR. 0 PROPOSED AREA BASEMENT. 0 1ST FLOOR. 768 2ND FLOOR: 2016 3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 13RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 480 DECK: 384 OTHER: 0 FRONTSETBACK SIDESUBACKREAR S ETBACK REQUIRED:25 PROPOSED:25 REQUIRED:10/35 PROPOSED:77 REQUIRED:25 PROPOSED:83 HEIGHT ALLOWED:25 PROPOSED:24.38 REQUIRED: 10/35 PROPOSED: 16 SETBACK NOTES: Side setbacks minimum 10' but must total a minimum of 25' I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOINGTHE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATINGTO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS/HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID. Signature Print Name Date ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/ IBC 10/ IRCI 10. ARCHIVE APPLICANT ASSESSOR OTHER STATUS: ISSUED BLD2OO704O0 CONDITIONS PURSUANT TO ECDC 17.70 THE EXISTING RESIDENCE IS CONSIDERED A SECURITY UNIT USED TEMPORARILY IN CONNECTION WITH PROVIDING SECURITY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. THE SECURITY UNIT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 6 MONTHS AFTER ISSUANCE OF BLD20070400. A SEPARATE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR REMOVAL OF THE SECURITY UNIT. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT: • Excavation/Grading/Site Preparation • Placement of fill and compaction • Proof Rolling • Soil bearing verification, pole embedment into soil • Drilled pier installation • Retaining wall construction including footing drain • Subsurface drainage installation including footing drains • Field welding (MUST BE WABO CERTIFIED WELDERS) • AT EXTERIOR DECK PROVIDE ENGINEERED CONNECTION DETAIL (PRIOR TO FRAMING APPROVAL) FOR STEEL TO WOOD CONNECTION • Lot line stakes must be in place at the time of foundation/setback inspection. • All new, extended, re -built or relocated electrical utility and/or service shall be placed underground. • Approval of this foundation design is conditional subject to inspection of existing site soil conditions. Retaining Walls must be designed and constructed to resist the lateral pressure ofthe retained material. Provisions must be made for the control and drainage of surface water around buildings. • Installer shall provide the manufacturers installation, operating instructions, and a whole house ventilation system operation description. A label shall be affixed to the whole house timer control that reads "Whole House Ventilation" (see operating instructions). • Maximum Height 25 feet. Measured fromaverage elevation of undisturbed soil at comers of extended building rectangle. Subject to field check by building department. • Hose Bibbs (exterior faucets) are required to have a pernnanently affixed anti -siphon device installed. • In addition to the required pressure/relief valve, an approved listed expansion tank shall be installed on all hot water tanks. Per UPC 608. • Type B or L vent connectors required on fuel -burning appliances passing through unheated spaces. Per IMC 803.2 • Obtain Electrical Permit from State Department of Labor & Industries. 425-290-1309 • Pursuant to UPC 605.2 a water service shutoff shall be installed on the water line as it enters the building. • City approved plastic piping may be used in water service piping provided that where metal water service piping is used for electrical grounding purposes, replacement piping shall be of like materials (UPC 604.8). A state electrical pem»t and inspection is required if electrical grounding is altered, removed, improved, or added. Contact State Dept. of Labor & Industries Electrical Division at 425-290-1309. • Submit all special inspection reports to the City Building Inspector on a weekly basis. • Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopte',codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. • Pursuant to UPC 608 a pressure regulator valve (PRV) shall be installed near the water shutoff. • Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:OOpm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activites must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. INSPECTIONS THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 ENGINID2ING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 FIRE (425) 771-0215 PUBLIC WORKS 425 771-0235 PII&TREAT ENT 425 672-5755 RECYCLING 425 275-4801 When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being requested, Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon. • E-Erosion Control/Mobilization • EStormTightline • &Storm Connect to Stub • E-Storm Detention System • E•Footing Drain Connection • )-Water Service Line • B-Driveway Form & Slope Ver. • EPavement Subgrade • )-Engineering Final • B-Setbacks • B-Footings • B-Foundation Wall • B-Isolated Footings/Piers • B-Plumb Ground Work • B-First Floor Framing • B-Plumb Rough In • B-Gas Test/Pipe • B-Equipment-Mech • B-Fxerior Sheathing • B-Shear Nailing • B-Height Verification • B-Framing • B-WallInsulation/Caulk • B-Floor Insulation/Caulk • B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk • B-SheetrockNail • B-Building Final CITY OF EDMONDS SHEET FILE CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 16105 N. Meadowdale Road Tax Acct. Number: 00513100004802 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-2005-0170 Applicant: Kenneth M. Goff Owner: Kathryn B. Saldin CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-2005-0170) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Erosion Hazard Areas, Landslide Hazard Area, and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning. Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. • Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. among others. • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. • Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. U 1] STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS Since the site is within a mapped fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, the City would like to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ON A SITE WITH FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS The applicant must submit a clearing/tree cutting plan with any development permit. Tree cutting and clearing of native vegetation shall be limited to the footprint of development. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Gina Coccia Planner w/l/1M November 21, 2005 Name, Title U Signature Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 #P2u i City of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any. person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: ' V 11-76�2 9- Critical Areas File #: 200 5 - 01 --� -O Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant:_ 1 J -- 2-1-o5 A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it . to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in fording and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT /M DATE IO l3, /.,— Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. ViGI�ATURE OF OWNER DATE & '.3 ^ Ddr PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY eep/Applicant: 99,7`� Name Street Address j City State . Zip Telephone: Vol- S` 7V 3 - ' Tcf#3 Email address (optional): �Y Ap plicant Representative: . Name Z90 z.q /6-1 #UC 'Sc Street Address YFXJ�- City State Zip Telephone: 706 - Email Address (optional): #PZO Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: D ©�- tZ Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) L. Site Address/ Location "4i �� C44--w� l6 10 2. Property Tax.Account Number: 'b6 Lit obob 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Ott tit 4. Is this site currently developed? O� yes; no. If yes; how is, site developed?. -';,7k_n 6Lir- ':: , �►�„� J2f� �� 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 3.0% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: N1 ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway D floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? !N 0 Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ;shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: ni For City Staff Use Only (P. 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? _ jj Mf., q 1 V-y l 2. Site is Zoned? R• S — 20. 3. SC5 mapped soil type(s)? 4 fit Gl PiY vVOOd - :ytiY '-olW U 10 Q „h 25--+D'/- 510p & v-- A-l.d 06AV Ut C-)andu 10a1 - t %sloA-P-s. 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? i c,GJ :+ �_I i m rfiuvot rd t�aM al rat i d i fiUyol �zl ,& Vi cnh V w i t d t f ffc,, "Iof fizz t "0 5 e&YVIV 6Nn a 1 Ca"" 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? N 0 — bU t V)Q t dl n U ()% U a l +0 ma -h YXA 1 d-t*t ywt t Yla+i 0,r1 ( venA C,lohe 1 DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by: G i Yi GL %UGL I GL/ Date: j 1 j ti 1 1-1i0 0 5 \AL I „ ISsls I 721s SoB ISI 71„ I /ln] 7101 17031 J I Taos i 15520 r--- r--, 156TH ST SIN l 72zz n2a JInU i 1560, � I s6oz I eels fiB17 roz6 15600 � a 1561s �j —1 1 15604 Q 7120 I 7, to 15621 6816 ,'n � 15625 15610 1 Z 7029 7019 156317119 Q68126811 15620 1 15703 15705 �{1• - 15620 I 15715 —115570 15700 15701 2 n I I 1570/157 WWI t S719 712 15706 6We 15714 ism15721 IS728 15724 _ 15729 _ „ 15730 15725 15720 __— 15730 15732 �: 1 E 15810 400 ' 7324 15808 15E00 15808 [ ISa09 15814.'.I 15812 15821 15911 I 15814 15810 Ise ` 151124 . .. J 15825 15915 15824 Isa27 15626 15826 IS908 a 7 15805 15805 ` ~ — 15911 15907 15902 15904 15910 n 15925 IS917 15910 15902 b 7 15902 15908 15906 3 15927 \\ 15915 6907 15917 \ 15912 6,815 7309 - \ 15920 -_ - 16000 -- ... 7429-�� 15926 1 !A 159J1 60TH S7 SW 16123 16121 16006 16012 g 7\ ^\ I6008 16010 �70 6910 6620 o f -. !r I6008 16024 �/ \ 69t6 6626 16oJ4 _ I \16119\ 161 t5\ . 160JI J I61,6 -�'� \ 1 16020 6 960 _ :'• 16010 r'a l 69?0 16038 16036 O 7� W 1610 5 16105 8F / p'S 16t18 6609 6803 1 / LL / • 69,8 o __//// y 64 16111 t. b `6`�I -� 16120 / ' 1/ 6912 6908 1 ..sMeado.da�. ,rf 16115 ,, , 15 6604 Marfrltl_ . 0 16122 16131 16121 \b 162 11 16116 t 162ND ST 4 16209 162t19 Q 16202 / '�I6216 f623 3 162,. 6925 d t 162% 11 �,. < �. lam16221 16236 z ,6220 N ' \N\ INm"e O 7� - 6805 16310 IU39 r 16228 b� tl 16311 1212 16222 16232 f f \1 I 16320 y \67 N 6602I16315 16318 1 -J 16315 16320 m ` 16330 16319 ^' 3 16319 7316 -- 6901. �18340 aJ 7109 n 16323 163z216321 6gp� 16411 7604 7317 7114 6803, rim_ 7110 71M M30 7014 B � 16420 a 16429 1 �- SW .. ... 16419 a v 16431 7406 7314 7010 6611 16508 1 _ 16423 7028 7020 16510 6601 Meadouvdate /���VQr� Canmunr k 16520 16510 I6500 I6501 -- CA.b 0 3 tr y� p� A Snohomish County Area, Washington - Microsoft Internet Explorer T �>� � � r � a � ar ,�_ ■ ^i. �f 7w � i,.;�l F 7� 1RfA � i +iAV V � � � ! ,.f 10 � � a Ap. , p(�' y. Bi f' Y t Map,, 54991$ 8 , 5300384 17 Imaae Z35,43 5calsstart Factor 2 1572.95 x j Zcmin,.. Mishi,,, rnoh,,, `X �" f F 5,23 FM Figure 23.80.000 CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS Critical Areas Compliance Requirements* " Cec�iogi"ally Hazardous yAreas a (Gelut,lcall,• ;+t�f�ite�itHii`� Rc(tot't'>i� h:uurdnus'•Irr•a ;l;eo• 'l2g(,�uiltlr��NTtd hazard! nl:ry I+c ::;�ea��' asnt�t�tQit• located on or near itm"ttutt o�ge(>-=�• snhjc�t parcel• _:;�i:t�Zsftl�. i�`,k:e Q-tcchnital report conkudes no jurisdictional gr3- hazards 10cated < ?UU ft from subject parcel. ' No'additional compliance . requirements. ' ( tact hilictl rcI,urt �'• • r:.• clif�tic��LReport 14•v.I• ul.td I' concludes iurisdirtion;tl q,�'" ��•���. tV ,sithin t;to•h,vard geo• har.,rd area located yQ 4:ejii�tFt �i{ttu%#aYtes and: �� withill 200 It of subject! t ttii ash parcel. ti1;1,1 had gou• kr,ht, rd ttvo- 11.1r.lyd huf el �• 'i' hantrd 1wf1rr 1)ev0upalent Ivoids geo-hazard arcu and go ft buffers. No additional compliance requireiitent4. Pcvt'lopowat an+tds geu- hazatd but cnaoaches on standard ?U-K butler. No additional o nipliuncc requirements. DeMopnlcnr emrnachcs clo r r lhan 10 ft to dchilc ed gco hazard are.i. `;No,tdiiitioitnl compliance requirements upon.. iniplentrnratton of geiitechnioal recommendations. requirements may be met through submission of a single critical area report or multiple reports"I n .combination. Is DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS PER INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE SECTION R110 d• AT: 16109 North Meadowdale Road :.Building Permit M 2007-0400 Occupancy established by this certificate: 1V R3 Dwelling Units: 1 No. Stories: 2 Basement: NIA Type of Construction: VB S ' Owner of building: ; xf Z KattfQ;;taldin The Single Family Residence at 16109 North MeadowdaleiRd.,,. has been inspected and approved complying with the requirements of the 2003 edition of the International Residential Code as';adoptedby_thefor'fFie group and division of occupancy and the use for which - :-..Cify the proposed occupancy is classified. Issued this 51h day of November. 2008 Chief Building Official By: n' Any change of occupancy or use requires a buil ng per it and a new Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Edmonds Building Official. CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ih c . 1 g90 Planning • Building • Engineering May 21, 2008 Kenneth M Goff MAM Construction l PO Box 91 Kent, WA 98035 RE: Request for driveway slope waiver at 16109 N Meadowdale Rd Dear Kenneth; GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR We have reviewed your request for a driveway slope waiver up to 20% for the above address. We understand that due to the downhill cross slope of N Meadowdale Rd it is difficult to slope the new driveway slope under 14%, as required in Section 18.80.060D without creating too steep of a cross slope through the rest of the driveway. Therefore considering the challenges of this lot, we will approve the subject waiver request. The driveway slope is granted up to 20%. If you have any questions please call me at 425-771-0220, ext 1324. Sincerely, Noel Miller, P.E. Acting City Engineer Public Works Department Cc: file S:IENGR1JoAnne\Correspondencelsaldin-dw slope waiver.doc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • May 20, 2008 City of Edmonds Development Services Department/ Engineering Division 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds WA 98020 Attn: JoAnne Zulauf Project: New SFR @ 16109 N Meadowdale Road Joanne: We have a new Residence for the Saldin/ Burns family under construction and nearing completion at the above address. It is situated on the east side of North Meadowdale Road. North Meadowdale Road as it passes the site is a steepish downhill to the north. The building pad and garage apron are upslope from the road. This roadway, site, driveway alignment has created a steeper than permitted driveway slope on The northern (downhill) portion of the driveway in spite of our best efforts to bring the grade into compliance. The bulk of the driveway and the uphill portion from the centerline all fall within the grading parameters. We respectfully request a variance from the driveway grading requirements for the above named portion of our soon to be paved driveway. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Kenneth M Goff, Owner MAM Construction PO Box 91 Kent WA 98035 206.947.5420 • STANDARD DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET (5000 SF OR LESS) CALC. BY: f?A r.Lr e� OWNER: ADDRESS: t, PHONE: 65;6—7¢GS SA L D I N 161 O °J A MEADOW DALE RD, L IJJ�I b�VjjS DATE: 4 9 �ooR IMPERVIOUS SUFACE AREA 4.3`r �- SF PIPE DIA. 24 PIPE LENGTH .36 G ORIFICE /8 FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT RIM ELEV. 25 DETENTION PIPE LENGTH FINISHED GRADE TIG BE CONNECTED TO OCKING LID (TYPJ IM ELEV. 2190 F 8" Min. clearance 1FMeasured from top of Cona box or riser. DETENTION SYSTEM RIM ELEV. 298 95 -� 0.5% TO 1.0% SLOPE TO CITY coNVEyANCE 24'l0 INV. EL.EV.Z.42 - NV. ELEV. 246 3o ELEV. CITY STORM CONVEYANCE UPPER CATCH BASIN uNTR CONTROL SYSTEM L CS 8• IN' RIFICE SPREADER TRENCH DEEP CONTROL CATCH BASINsHALL BEAMIN. ARRY SPALLS OR EQUAL) OF 10' LONG AND IN. 6' COVER FROM CONTROL C PERPENDICULAR TO CONTROL CB. N!! R Gem V B CONTROL CB SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR 1 5 TO SPREADER TRENCH TRENCH SHALL BE LINED JUN 29 2007 PERF. PIPE SHALL BE WITH MIRAFI & ON TOP LEVEL d, CAPPED AT ENDS 5, BUILDING DEPARTME RIPRAP OUTLET is' WASHED DRAIN ROCK CITY OF EDMONDS SPREADER TRENCH NOTES 1. CALL ENGINEERING DIVISION (771-0220 EXT. 1326) 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR A TIGHTLINE AND DETENTION _ AP ROVED BY SYSTEM INSPECTION BEFORE BACKFILLING AND FOR FINAL INSPECTIONS. 2. Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner.. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from catch basins to allow proper operation. j 7 The outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. DA E ...:i..'�! f.'.�fn�.44^�r1ii:...':w�rw-....�:•: Y: :: -.�.. �.-..::.v.�L\'ii.Y.�VY�h..»• yy. .� . � . � • a.h.: st r 1 r SY.' 16109 STREFT F 0 20' M ' r Z m Z 2.5' DEEP I m TYPE 1 L CB D 0 O 0 I m 5 ' I TI POWER POLE O D I � I 3' DEE 1 , I I I I NOTICE: NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY. The information shown on the attached map was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its employees and consultants. The City of WATER ETER Edmonds does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on the map. Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information I / shown on the map, including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. I 7/ Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its employees or officers shall be liable for the information given on this map, nor for any oral representation provided based upon said map. / ., 0 F ED i,,,_ F ti CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS -BUILT ADDRESS: PERMIT 16109 N . M EADOWDALE RD N❑- BLD 20070400 CONTRACTOR: HOMEOWNER: SCALE: MAM CONSTRUCTION SALDIN NTS DATE INSPECTED: INSPECTED BY: DATE DRAWN: DRAWN BYi 1/25/08 J. McCONNELL 6/30/08 B. SHIU .Message Page 1 of 3 � 6/9 IV /t Graf, Jeannine From: Ken Goff [KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:11 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: Re: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Ms. Graf: Thank you for the clarification. I will have Kerrel Bell contact you directly. Ken Goff MAM Construction ----- Original Message ----- From: Graf. Jeannine To: KGMAM@msn.com Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:07 PM Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, In my opinion the only person needed is the Surveyor; who sites the property on the GeoEngineers Map. If any portion of the property is within the mapped hazards then ECDC 19.10 provisions apply. If the site is not within the mapped hazards then Critical Areas (ECDC Title 23) applies (regulated by the Planning Division). Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:52 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: Re: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Ms. Graf: Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. As I stated in the letter that I e-mailed to Meg Gruwell on 9/21 1 will be the construction lead on this project. This afternoon I should have the report in my hands from the Geotechnical Engineer. I spoke with Kerrel Bell PLS of Pacific Geomatic Services, who has already completed the topographical survey of the property, this morning about placing the subject property on your vicinity map as prepared by GeoEngineers. He asked me to forward him the a copy of the map as provided in your earth subsidence packet so that he could familiarize himself with it. I did so via regular mail this morning. Kerrel said that once he received and reviewed the map that he and I would talk and then make an appointment with you to place the project. In a telcon with the Geotechnical Engineer yesterday afternoon requesting his attendence at a meeting, he stated that he felt that it was premature as there was no home design as of yet. We have retained Barqhausen Consulting Engineers as our TESC, grading, drainage and utilities design team, and if necessary they will also become our lead Design Professionals. The viability of this project of course depends on costs. The design of the proposed home as a result is only a proposed footprint superimposed on the survey. No formal plans have been prepared as yet. 10/9/2006 ;Message 0 • Page 2 of 3 We are completely aware that our critical areas determination stated unequivocably that the final determination as to the sites critical area location was yours. My question to you is will the report from the Geotechnical Engineer and a face to face meeting with the Surveyor and myself suffice for this determination? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 ----- Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine To: KGMAM@msn.com Cc: Harrison, Marie; Gruwell, Meg ; Coccia, Gina Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:37 PM Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, Ms. Saldin has requested a separate meeting with her surveyor, her geotechnical engineer and myself for the purpose of plotting her site on our adopted GeoEngineers Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Map. At the conclusion of this meeting a final determination shall be made by my office whether or not the additional provisions of ECDC 19.10 shall apply to the proposed development at the referenced address of 16109 North Meadowdale Road in Edmonds. Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, City Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:14 PM To: 'Ken Goff Cc: Harrison, Marie; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Sorry to take so long in replying to your e-mail. We were able to discuss the property in our staff meeting Wednesday. There are two different chapters that deal with lands on slopes. The first is Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) chapter 19.10 "Building permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. This is part of title 19, which deals with building permits. The Building Official is the one in charge of codes in this title, and she is the one who makes the determination whether chapter 19.10 will apply to a property. Ms. Saldin noted that on the Critical Areas Checklist Gina Coccia had noted that the site was not within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area, but the the Building Official was to make the final determination because it was very close. The maps we refer to in filling out that part of the checklist are very gross, so it is difficult to tell at the perimeter if a site is in or out. That is why we point out that the Building Official will make the final determination. She has determined that the property at 16109 N. Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Marie Harrison has sent you an e-mail on September 18, 2006, stating this also. The building packet for development in the earth subsidence area will be needed to construct a house on this site. The second chapter referring to sites on slopes is under Title 23 ECDC "Natural Resources." The Planning Division takes the lead for this title. Chapter 23.80 deals with "Geologically Hazardous Areas" and requires that -steep slopes and areas subject to liquefaction get special attention. Gina Coccia noted that the area is in or adjacent to both an Erosion Hazard and a Landslide Hazard Area. In this chapter, a site could be in a Landslide Hazard Area because it 10/9/2006 Message 0 n I,J Page 3 of 3 was in the mapped earth subsidence area, or because of steep slopes on the site. Ms. Coccia requires a study, which for a steep slope will be a topographical survey of the site that determines the slope of the site, the top and toe of the slope, and whether the proposed project maintains the required buffer and building setback. If the proposed house is closer than allowed to a steep slope top or toe, then a geotechnical engineering report will be required to determine if it can be safely built, and what conditions will be required. The requirements of Chapter 23.80 must be met as part of the geotechnical report. Temporary and permanent erosion control measures will also be required in an Erosion Hazard Area. Ms. Coccia also noted that the site is in a mapped Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, so the city will try to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible per ECDC chapter 23.90. Your letter sent September 21, 2006, states that you no longer plan to convert the existing house into a guest house, but would like to delay demolishing the house until after construction of the new house is complete. We are currently checking with our city attorney about this, but at the very least, we would require a bond for the cost of the demolition of the house, we would place a condition on the certificate of occupancy for the new house that required the old house to be demolished, and we would likely require a covenant on the property stating that two houses would not be allowed on the site. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Meg Gruweff Senior Planner, City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220, Extension 1330 -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 6:33 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: We are in the early stages of preparing a permit application for a new single family home on the above property. In requesting a permit packet, we were furnished an earth subsidence packet. It was our understanding, previously, that while we were not actually in a critical area, we were close, and that some of the critical area items would be required but probably not all. When I asked this of Marie Harrison she indicated that the Building Official felt that this was an ECDC 19.10 project but that I should get the question clarified by you. Is this going to be an earth subsidence permit application? Ken Goff - -- - - --- - - -- — — MAM Construction 206-947-5420 o ro i'i 10/9/2006 ED Telephone /Ctunter Conversation Record DATE: TIME: FILE: i4l f4tF4 le Ilei., v.-i . e; raid 1,1A0 Al rT-� /%,0 17�11 AV .tAid �.✓ '� �(i' /G oft .fG</iG /� `r f 'lG✓�9 dL'J ND� /,�1CG Ile-^',�/ G/✓lB^v4'v A7s���y�.r. . r aA-il col-/wow/w, ecr1/ov �SGH.9-- la--41of .,6ul rk A-eeoef kvAp- ivi l✓o . AS Cl c��l� �G✓ -� l 11 av4E-Lp(, 7i#r 23 -111) . o/d Af,' /✓ /�✓V aZ �S�N�} M q. t,,YAP V 740 FG1oL 9. /0, Told kA 7 f, P o-. U/Ott J �91ne 6t^4 "L !� . i-/Jo �GL � 7'�✓ /.,j 5SW /of--/s POW �WVefe �- /'(v AC6 23 �t l tr shop✓ X 61 (a4 v e at, -o, � 423 cvfv � � i� A J1 A d � /T" J� 6 tjyt & �,� �aG- �rS- w/ii,AA jm4pe-kpo -- �r,,,,lLfly wi/I ,(`ivo`✓ �� � -- �l�W �-�o�-/�- fide of E L404 -iVG i /l - r ,OI'oAe Ai 7152001 d:recepowgproA*kj�eP � ^�eroonvrec doc r Message • • Page 1 of 2 Harrison, Marie From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:51 AM To: 'Ken Goff Subject: RE: Permit application for single family residence Dear Ken: On April 2, 2007, the City of Edmonds adopted a new Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Map. The property located at 16105 N. Meadowdale Road is outside the new boundaries. You are still in a critical area so you may want to talk to someone in the planning department regarding their requirements for projects within a critical area. Sincerely, i?Z=w -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:13 AM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Re: Permit application for single family residence Marie: We finally have the documents together from the design professionals on this project. In reviewing the paperwork in the packet you mailed me, though, I do not find anything that looks like a building permit application form. Do you require one? Do you have one? Am I missing it somewhere in my file? On a related note, do you folks normally require a preapp meeting? If so, can I get one scheduled? If not, do you require an intake appointment? If so, can I get that scheduled? Thanks in advance. Ken Goff MAM Construction ----- Original Message ----- From: Harrison, Marie To: Ken Goff Cc: Gruwell Me Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:24 PM Subject: RE: Permit application for single family residence Dear Ken: The Building Official has determined that the property at 16109 N Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Please refer to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 Building Permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas (this code became effective May 13, 1988). We actually sell building packets for development in this area. The building packet sells for $30.00. If you wish to purchase a packet, please drop a check in the mail and I would be happy to mail it to you. As far as two residences on one lot, I will need to refer you to the Planning Department. I will forward your email to Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner. Sincerely, Marie Harrison 4/5/2007 Message • • Page 2 of 2 -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:04 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Permit application for single family residence Hi: We will be applying for a permit to construct a new single family residence at 16109 North Meadowdale Road on a lot that presently has an existing single family home on it. The existing home is occupied by an elderly lady that will be sharing the new home with her adult daughter and her daughter's family. The existing home will be legally demolished and disposed of. Two questions: 1) Can you forward a submittal packet either via this e-mail electronically or via conventional mail to PO Box 91, Kent WA 98035 Attn: Ken Goff? 2) The normal routine for this project would be Hazmat inspection, demo and then new construction. Since the new structure will be occupied by the inhabitant of the existing structure, and it would pose a hardship on the owner, Kathryn Saldin, do you think it would be possible to post a bond insuring the removal of the existing structure after the Owner occupied the new structure? Ken Goff MAM Construction 4/5/2007 Message Harrison, Marie From: Ken Goff [KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:13 AM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Re: Permit application for single family residence Pagel of 2 Marie: We finally have the documents together from the design professionals on this project. In reviewing the paperwork in the packet you mailed me, though, I do not find anything that looks like a building permit application form. Do you require one? Do you have one? Am I missing it somewhere in my file? On a related note, do you folks normally require a preapp meeting? If so, can I get one scheduled? If not, do you require an intake appointment? If so, can I get that scheduled? Thanks in advance. Ken Goff MAM Construction ----- Original Message ----- From: Harrison, Marie To: Ken Goff Cc: Gruwell, Mep Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:24 PM Subject: RE: Permit application for single family residence Dear Ken: The Building Official has determined that the property at 16109 N Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Please refer to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 Building Permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas (this code became effective May 13, 1988). We actually sell building packets for development in this area. The building packet sells for $30.00. If you wish to purchase a packet, please drop a check in the mail and I would be happy to mail it to you. As far as two residences on one lot, I will need to refer you to the Planning Department. I will forward your email to Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner. Sincerely, Marie Harrison -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:04 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Permit application for single family residence Hi: We will be applying for a permit to construct a new single family residence at 16109 North Meadowdale Road on a lot that presently has an existing single family home on it. The existing home is occupied by an elderly lady that will be sharing the new home with her adult daughter and her daughter's family. The existing home will be legally demolished and disposed of. Two questions: 1) Can you forward a submittal packet either via this e-mail electronically or via conventional mail to PO 4/5/2007 Message Page 2 of 2 Box 91, Kent WA 98035 Attn: Ken Goff? 2) The normal routine for this project would be Hazmat inspection, demo and then new construction. Since the new structure will be occupied by the inhabitant of the existing structure, and it would pose a hardship on the owner, Kathryn Saldin, do you think it would be possible to post a bond insuring the removal of the existing structure after the Owner occupied the new structure? Ken Goff MAM Construction 4/5/2007 Message • � Page 1 of 2 Graf, Jeannine From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:37 PM To: 'KGMAM@msn.com' Cc: Harrison, Marie; Gruwell, Meg; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, Ms. Saldin has requested a separate meeting with her surveyor, her geotechnical engineer and myself for the purpose of plotting her site on our adopted GeoEngineers Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Map. At the conclusion of this meeting a final determination shall be made by my office whether or not the additional provisions of ECDC 19.10 shall apply to the proposed development at the referenced address of 16109 North Meadowdale Road in Edmonds. Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, City Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:14 PM To: 'Ken Goff Cc: Harrison, Marie; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Sorry to take so long in replying to your e-mail. We were able to discuss the property in our staff meeting Wednesday. There are two different chapters that deal with lands on slopes. The first is Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) chapter 19.10 "Building permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. This is part of title 19, which deals with building permits. The Building Official is the one in charge of codes in this title, and she is the one who makes the determination whether chapter 19.10 will apply to a property. Ms. Saldin noted that on the Critical Areas Checklist Gina Coccia had noted that the site was not within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area, but the the Building Official was to make the final determination because it was very close. The maps we refer to in filling out that part of the checklist are very gross, so it is difficult to tell at the perimeter if a site is in or out. That is why we point out that the Building Official will make the final determination. She has determined that the property at 16109 N. Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Marie Harrison has sent you an e-mail on September 18, 2006, stating this also. The building packet for development in the earth subsidence area will be needed to construct a house on this site. The second chapter referring to sites on slopes is under Title 23 ECDC "Natural Resources." The Planning Division takes the lead for this title. Chapter 23.80 deals with "Geologically Hazardous Areas" and requires that steep slopes and areas subject to liquefaction get special attention. Gina Coccia noted that the area is in or adjacent to both an Erosion Hazard and a Landslide Hazard Area. In this chapter, a site could be in a Landslide Hazard Area because it was in the mapped earth subsidence area, or because of steep slopes on the site. Ms. Coccia requires a study, which for a steep slope will be a topographical survey of the site that determines the slope of the site, the top and toe of the slope, and whether the proposed project maintains the required buffer and building setback. If the proposed house is closer than allowed to a steep slope top or toe, then a geotechnical eng_ineerin report will be required to determine if it can be safely built, and what conditions will be required. The requirements of Chapter 23.80 must be met as part of the geotechnical report. Temporary and permanent erosion control measures will also be required in an Erosion Hazard Area. Ms. Coccia also noted that the site is in a mapped Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, so the city will try to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible per ECDC chapter 23.90. 10/6/2006 Message 0 � Page 2 of 2 Your letter sent September 21, 2006, states that you no longer plan to convert the existing house into a guest house, but would like to delay demolishing the house until after construction of the new house is complete. We are currently checking with our city attorney about this, but at the very least, we would require a bond for the cost of the demolition of the house, we would place a condition on the certificate of occupancy for the new house that required the old house to be demolished, and we would likely require a covenant on the property stating that two houses would not be allowed on the site. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. �I1e9 Gruwefr Senior Planner, City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220, Extension 1330 -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 6:33 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: We are in the early stages of preparing a permit application for a new single family home on the above property. In requesting a permit packet, we were furnished an earth subsidence packet. It was our understanding, previously, that while we were not actually in a critical area, we were close, and that some of the critical area items would be required but probably not all. When I asked this of Marie Harrison she indicated that the Building Official felt that this was an ECDC 19.10 project but that I should get the question clarified by you. Is this going to be an earth subsidence permit application? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 10/6/2006 Message • Page 1 of 1 Graf, Jeannine From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 3:44 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: RE: Permit application for single family residence Our response is: The planning division will determine if the site is located in a critical area as defined by ECDC Chapter 23. The building official believes the site to be within the mapped earth subsidence landslide hazard area of north Edmonds and subject to ECDC 19.10 requirements. -----Original Message ----- From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 1:02 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: FW: Permit application for single family residence Please see below. Should I have him mark it on the map and email it to us? Marie -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 12:06 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Re: Permit application for single family residence Marie: We received the permit intake packet for the new residence at 16109 N Meadowdale Rd just fine. Thank you. If I read the enclosed map correctly the site is near, but not in, any of the outlined critical areas. Does that sound right to you? If so, do we still have to satisfy all of the items on the checklist? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 9/26/2006 Message Page 1 of 1 Graf, Jeannine From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 11:47 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Cc: Harrison, Marie Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Hi Meg, The licensed land surveyor is going to site the Saldin property on the GeoEngineers map (stamp and sign it) and Mrs. Saldin will submit it when she makes application for their new single family residence. If any portion of the site falls within the mapped ESLHA hazards, ECDC 19.10 applies and the DST shall only accept the application if it is compliant to our ESLHA checklist. If no portion of the site is within the mapped ESLHA the DST shall be in contact with you whether or not you will require outside peer review for ECDC Title 23 compliance. On a side note the draft ESLHA map places this property outside the mapped hazards for 19.10. Thanks, JLG -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:33 AM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: FW: 16109 North Meadowdale Road I presume you will need to see the map first, before you can confirm whether it will be subject to ECDC 19.10 or not? Feel free to e-mail him directly, or if you let me know his next step, I would be glad to get back to him. Thank you. -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:27 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: Re: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: Our surveyor, Kerrel Bell with Pacific Geomatic Services, has been in direct touch with the City Building Official, Jeannine Graf. Rather then have a face to face meeting to establish the properties physical location on the GeoEngineers' hazardous area map your building department provided us she asked him to locate it on the map and place his chop on it. He did so and returned the map to me. The located site is in a critical but not hazardous area as Gina Coccia had previously told Kathryn Saldin. My question is this: With this map, the completed topographical survey, the geotechs' report and the indication in your last e-mail that should this be only a critical area it would fall under your purview, how do you want us to proceed from here? Ken Goff MAM Construction 10/16/2006 Message • 0 Page 1 of 1 Harrison, Marie From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 11:47 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Cc: Harrison, Marie Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Hi Meg, The licensed land surveyor is going to site the Saldin property on the GeoEngineers map (stamp and sign it) and Mrs. Saldin will submit it when she makes application for their new single family residence. If any portion of the site falls within the mapped ESLHA hazards, ECDC 19.10 applies and the DST shall only accept the application if it is compliant to our ESLHA checklist. If no portion of the site is within the mapped ESLHA the DST shall be in contact with you whether or not you will require outside peer review for ECDC Title 23 compliance. On a side note the draft ESLHA map places this property outside the mapped hazards for 19.10. Thanks, JLG -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:33 AM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: FW: 16109 North Meadowdale Road I presume you will need to see the map first,. before you can confirm whether it will be subject to ECDC 19.10 or not? Feel free to e-mail him directly, or if you let me know his next step, I would be glad to get back to him. Thank you. -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 9:27 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: Re: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: Our surveyor, Kerrel Bell with Pacific Geomatic Services, has been in direct touch with the City Building Official, Jeannine Graf. Rather then have a face to face meeting to establish the properties physical location on the GeoEngineers' hazardous area map your building department provided us she asked him to locate it on the map and place his chop on it. He did so and returned the map to me. The located site is in a critical but not hazardous area as Gina Coccia had previously told Kathryn Saldin. My question is this: With this map, the completed topographical survey, the geotechs' report and the indication in your last e-mail that should this be only a critical area it would fall under your purview, how do you want us to proceed from here? Ken Goff MAM Construction 10/16/2006 Message • %j ` „ oeo 3 Graf, Jeannine From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:07 PM To: 'KGMAM@msn.com' Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, In my opinion the only person needed is the Surveyor; who sites the property on the GeoEngineers Map. If any portion of the property is within the mapped hazards then ECDC 19.10 provisions apply. If the site is not within the mapped hazards then Critical Areas (ECDC Title 23) applies (regulated by the Planning Division). Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:52 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: Re: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Ms. Graf: Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. As I stated in the letter that I e-mailed to Meg Gruwell on 9/21 1 will be the construction lead on this project. This afternoon I should have the report in my hands from the Geotechnical Engineer. I spoke with Kerrel Bell PLS of Pacific Geomatic Services, who has already completed the topographical survey of the property, this morning about placing the subject property on your vicinity map as prepared by GeoEngineers. He asked me to forward him the a copy of the map as provided in your earth subsidence packet so that he could familiarize himself with it. I did so via regular mail this morning. Kerrel said that once he received and reviewed the map that he and I would talk and then make an appointment with you to place the project. In a telcon with the Geotechnical Engineer yesterday afternoon requesting his attendence at a meeting, he stated that he felt that it was premature as there was no home design as of yet. We have retained Barqhausen Consulting Engineers as our TESC, grading, drainage and utilities design team, and if necessary they will also become our lead Design Professionals. The viability of this project of course depends on costs. The design of the proposed home as a result is only a proposed footprint superimposed on the survey. No formal plans have been prepared as yet. We are completely aware that our critical areas determination stated unequivocably that the final determination as to the sites critical area location was yours. My question to you is will the report from the Geotechnical Engineer and a face to face meeting with the Surveyor and myself suffice for this determination? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 ----- Original Message ----- From: Graf. Jeannine To: KGMAM()-msn.com 10/6/2006 Message . Page 2 of 3 Cc: Harrison, Marie; Gruwell, Meg; Coccia, Gina Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:37 PM Subject: RE: 16109 North .Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, Ms. Saldin has requested a separate meeting with her surveyor, her geotechnical engineer and myself for the purpose of plotting her site on our adopted GeoEngineers Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Map. At the conclusion of this meeting a final determination shall be made by my office whether or not the additional provisions of ECDC 19.10 shall apply to the proposed development at the referenced address of 16109 North Meadowdale Road in Edmonds. Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, City Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:14 PM To: 'Ken Goff Cc: Harrison, Marie; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Sorry to take so long in replying to your e-mail. We were able to discuss the property in our staff meeting Wednesday. There are two different chapters that deal with lands on slopes. The first is Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) chapter 19.10 "Building permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. This is part of title 19, which deals with building permits. The Building Official is the one in charge of codes in this title, and she is the one who makes the determination whether chapter 19.10 will apply to a property. Ms. Saldin noted that on the Critical Areas Checklist Gina Coccia had noted that the site was not within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area, but the the Building Official was to make the final determination because it was very close. The maps we refer to in filling out that part of the checklist are very gross, so it is difficult to tell at the perimeter if a site is in or out. That is why we point out that the Building Official will make the final determination. She has determined that the property at 16109 N. Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Marie Harrison has sent you an e-mail on September 18, 2006, stating this also. The building packet for development in the earth subsidence area will be needed to construct a house on this site. The second chapter referring to sites on slopes is under Title 23 ECDC "Natural Resources." The Planning Division takes the lead for this title. Chapter 23.80 deals with "Geologically Hazardous Areas" and requires that steep slopes and areas subject to liquefaction get special attention. Gina Coccia noted that the area is in or adjacent to both an Erosion Hazard and a Landslide Hazard Area. In this chapter, a site could be in a Landslide Hazard Area because it was in the mapped earth subsidence area, or because of steep slopes on the site. Ms. Coccia requires a study, which for a steep slope will be a topographical survey of the site that determines the slope of the site, the top and toe of the slope, and whether the proposed project maintains the required buffer and building setback. If the proposed house is closer than allowed to a steep slope top or toe, then a geotechnical engineering report will be required to determine if it can be safely built, and what conditions will be required. The requirements of Chapter 23.80 must be met as part of the geotechnical report. Temporary and permanent erosion control measures will also be required in an Erosion Hazard Area. Ms. Coccia also noted that the site is in a mapped Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, so the city will try to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible per ECDC chapter 23.90. Your letter sent September 21, 2006, states that you no longer plan to convert the existing house into a guest house, but would like to delay demolishing the house until after construction 10/6/2006 Message � � Page 3 of 3 of the new house is complete. We are currently checking with our city attorney about this, but at the very least, we would require a bond for the cost of the demolition of the house, we would place a condition on the certificate of occupancy for the new house that required the old house to be demolished, and we would likely require a covenant on the property stating that two houses would not be allowed on the site. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Weg _Gruwe(f Senior Planner, City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220, Extension 1330 -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 6:33 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: We are in the early stages of preparing a permit application for a new single family home on the above property. In requesting a permit packet, we were furnished an earth subsidence packet. It was our understanding, previously, that while we were not actually in a critical area, we were close, and that some of the critical area items would be required but probably not all. When I asked this of Marie Harrison she indicated that the Building Official felt that this was an ECDC 19.10 project but that I should get the question clarified by you. Is this going to be an earth subsidence permit application? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 10/6/2006 Mess�ge • � Page 1 of 2 Harrison, Marie From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:37 PM To: 'KGMAM@msn.com' Cc: Harrison, Marie; Gruwell, Meg; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Dear Mr. Goff, Ms. Saldin has requested a separate meeting with her surveyor, her geotechnical engineer and myself for the purpose of plotting her site on our adopted GeoEngineers Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Map. At the conclusion of this meeting a final determination shall be made by my office whether or not the additional provisions of ECDC 19.10 shall apply to the proposed development at the referenced address of 16109 North Meadowdale Road in Edmonds. Sincerely, Jeannine Graf, City Building Official -----Original Message ----- From: Gruwell, Meg Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 12:14 PM To: 'Ken Goff Cc: Harrison, Marie; Coccia, Gina Subject: RE: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Sorry to take so long in replying to your e-mail. We were able to discuss the property in our staff meeting Wednesday. There are two different chapters that deal with lands on slopes. The first is Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) chapter 19.10 "Building permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. This is part of title 19, which deals with building permits. The Building Official is the one in charge of codes in this title, and she is the one who makes the determination whether chapter 19.10 will apply to a property. Ms. Saldin noted that on the Critical Areas Checklist Gina Coccia had noted that the site was not within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area, but the the Building Official was to make the final determination because it was very close. The maps we refer to in filling out that part of the checklist are very gross, so.it is difficult to tell at the perimeter if a site is in or out. That is why we point out that the Building Official will make the final determination. She has determined that the property at 16109 N. Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Marie Harrison has sent you an e-mail on September 18, 2006, stating this also. The building packet for development in the earth subsidence area will be needed to construct a house on this site. The second chapter referring to sites on slopes is under Title 23 ECDC "Natural Resources." The Planning Division takes the lead for this title. Chapter 23.80 deals with "Geologically Hazardous Areas" and requires that steep slopes and areas subject to liquefaction get special attention. Gina Coccia noted that the area is in or adjacent to both an Erosion Hazard and a Landslide Hazard Area. In this chapter, a site could be in a Landslide Hazard Area because it was in the mapped earth subsidence area, or because of steep slopes on the site. Ms. Coccia requires a study, which for a steep slope will be a topographical survey of the site that determines the slope of the site, the top and toe of the slope, and whether the proposed project maintains the required buffer and building setback. If the proposed house is closer than allowed to a steep slope top or toe, then a geotechnical engineering report will be required to determine if it can be safely built, and what conditions will be required. The requirements of Chapter 23.80 must be met as part of the geotechnical report. Temporary and permanent erosion control measures will also be required in an Erosion Hazard Area. Ms. Coccia also noted that the site is in a mapped Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area, so the city will try to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible per ECDC chapter 23.90. 10/6/2006 Messsage • Page 2 of 2 • Your letter sent September 21, 2006, states that you no longer plan to convert the existing house into a guest house, but would like to delay demolishing the house until after construction of the new house is complete. We are currently checking with our city attorney about this, but at the very least, we would require a bond for the cost of the demolition of the house, we would place a condition on the certificate of occupancy for the new house that required the old house to be demolished, and we would likely require a covenant on the property stating that two houses would not be allowed on the site. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Meg Gruwed Senior Planner, City of Edmonds (425) 771-0220, Extension 1330 -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 6:33 AM To: Gruwell, Meg Subject: 16109 North Meadowdale Road Meg Gruwell: We are in the early stages of preparing a permit application for a new single family home on the above property. In requesting a permit packet, we were furnished an earth subsidence packet. It was our understanding, previously, that while we were not actually in a critical area, we were close, and that some of the critical area items would be required but probably not all. When I asked this of Marie Harrison she indicated that the Building Official felt that this was an ECDC 19.10 project but that I should get the question clarified by you. Is this going to be an earth subsidence permit application? Ken Goff MAM Construction 206-947-5420 10/6/2006 lle"Ioq &z. AGREEMENT FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION This Agreement for Reasonable Accommodation ("the Agreement-') is..hereby Lde and entered into this S day of /W&Waett , 2007, by and between the City of Edmonds ("the City"), a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington, and Kathryn Saldin, Mary Kathryn Burns and James Richard, Jr., each an individual and an owner of the subject real property (collectively "the Applicants"). RECITALS A. On September 13, 2007 the City issued a demolition permit (No. BLD20070934) authorizing the demolition of an existing single family dwelling structure upon the real property located at 16105/16109 North Meadowdaie Road and legally described ii. Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full ("the Property"). The existing single family structure is comprised of approximately 1,220 square feet, and is located within the area of the Property. B. The Property is owned jointly by the Applicants. C. On September 13, 2007, the City issued a building permit (No. BLD20070400) authorizing construction of a new single family dwelling upon the Property. D. The zoning designation for the Property is RS-20, which only allows one dwelling unit per lot. The owner has designated the existing dwelling as a security unit (the "Security Unit") as defined in ECDC Chapter 17.70.000, which allows the existing residence to remain only until the March 13, 2008 expiration date of the demolition permit, after which it must be demolished. E. Kathryn Saldin has a documented permanent disability consisting of significant lower back pain and is under the care of a medical physician. EMI � s F. Because construction of the new residence will not likely be complete by March 13, 2008, the Applicants have requested reasonable accommodation pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of theEdmonds Community Development Code (ECDC).r G. Chapter 17.05 ECDC authorizes the City of Edmonds Community Services Director ("the Director") to waive, modify or vary ECDC provisions to the extent necessary for a disabled person to have full enjoyment of a property or residence. (JZL677440. DOC;1/00006.900150/) TERMS Based upon the above recitals and pursuant to Chapter 17.05 ECDC, the City and the Applicants hereby agree and covenant as follows: Reasonable Accommodation Granted. In accommodation of No. BLD20070400, or (2) January 1, 2009. Section 2. Nontransferrability of Accommodation. The reasonable accommodation provided under Section 1 of this Agreement is specific and personal to Kathryn Saldin, shall not run with the land, and shall not be utilized by any other person except to the limited extent set forth in ECDC 17.05.040. The Applicants shall, at their own expense, cause written .notification of the existence of this Agreement, together with a copy thereof, to be provided to any future owner or occupant of the Property. Section 3. Acknowledgement of Occupancy Precondition. The Applicants expressly acknowledge that the Security Unit must be completely demolished pursuant to Permit No. BLD20070934 prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new single family residence authorized under Permit No. BLD20070400. The Applicants hereby waive and forgo any claim, defense or cause of action against the City, its officials, employees and agents with respect to any refusal or delay by the City with respect to said certificate of occupancy to the extent that such refusal or delay results in any way from the failure of the Applicants to cause the Security Unit to be lawfully demolished. Section 4. Sale or Transfer of the Underlying Property. The Applicants shall notify the City of Edmonds Building Official in writing within 30 days of the sale or transfer of the Property. Section 5. Enforcement. The City may enforce the provisions of this Agreement using any lawful means at its disposal, including but not limited to code enforcement proceedings, civil litigation and/or abatement. All expenses incurred by the City in any such action, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Applicants upon written demand therefore. Section 6. Indemnification. The Applicants shall fully protect, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages and causes of action, including attorneys' fees, arising in any way directly or indirectly from the Applicants' breach of this Agreement. Section 7. Joint and Several Responsibility. The Applicants each expressly acknowledge and agree that any obligation, responsibility and/or liability imposed upon "the Applicants" under this Agreement shall be construed as referring to Kathryn Saldin, Mary Kathryn Burns and James Richard, Jr., each of whom shall be jointly and severally responsible therefore. { JZL677440.DOC; 1/00006.900150/ ) Section 8. Regulatory Authority Reserved. Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver, abridgement or limitation of the City of Edmonds' regulatory authority and police power, which the City hereby expressly reserves in full. By executing this Agreement as provided below, the parties hereto acknowledge and represent that they have read this Agreement, that they have enjoyed ample opportunity to discuss this Agreement with their own legal counsel, and that they understand and agree to be fully bound by the terms hereof. 07 ClIt OF EDMONDS (date) KATHRYN ALDIN (date) II (JZL677440.DOC;1/00006.900150/) 0 0 Exhibit A Property Description MEADOWDALE BEACH BLK 000 D-02 - TH PTN TRS 48 49-51 TGW A PTN PLATTED RD MEADOWDALE BEACH & VAC 40FT MEADOWDALE RD QCD VOL 1613 PG 308 DAF - BEG AT SE COR OF TR 49 TH S87*13 42W ALG S LN OF SD TR 49 FOR 210.52FT MIL TO INT MOST ELY LN OF A TR CONVYD TO WILLIAMS 7-31-50 AUD FILE NO 952093 & FURTHER DESC UNDER BDY AGREEMENT AUD FILE NO 1756182 TPB SD PT BEING MARKED BY AN IRON PIPE TH N17*32 48W ALG MOST ELY LN OF SD WILLIAMS TR 105FT TH S52* 12 40W 79.07FT TH S29*59 08W 93.03FT M/L TAP ON N MGN OF EXST 60FT R/W N MEADOWDALE RD AS EST BY CITY OF ED ORD NO 1853 SD PT BEING ON A CRV 14AVG A RAD THAT BEARS S33*38 18W 507.50FT TH SELY ALG NELY BDY OF SD R/W WH IS A CRV TO R THRU A C/A OF 20*39 17 AN ARC LENGTH OF 182.95FT TH N53*46 28E 25FT TH N04*12 48W 139.15FT TPB & TWG ALL TH PTN TR 49 & TR 48 & PLATTED R/W IF ANY & TR 50 LY SELY & SLY OF A LN DAF - COM AT CONC MON WITH BRASS DISK MARKING SE COR OF SWLY TH NO2*37 51 W ALG E LN SD SUB 1313.73F'F,.TO A CONC MON.WITH BRASS DISK IN CASE TH N89*51 44W 653.72FT TO A CONC MON WITH BRASS DISK IN CASE TH CONT N89*51 44W 5FT TO C/L OF 70TH AVE W TH S88*05 14W ALG C/L OF SD VAC ST 350.32FT SD PT BEING 20FT N & 22.1FT WLY OF NW COR TR 49 TH CONT S88*05 14W ALG SD C/L 128.24FT TAP ON EXST FENCE LN AS EST BY DEED REC NO 1756182 TH S15*28 OOE ALG SD FENCE LN 303.13FT TO NLY MGN OF N MEADOWDALE RD AS EST BY ORD NO 1853 TH TH S55*41 50E ALG RD MGN 67.73FT TO BEG OF A CRV TO R WITH RAD OF 507.69FT TH SELY ALG SD RD MGN & CRV THRU A C/A OF 00*58 24 AN ARC LENGTH OF 8.62FT TO TNT SWLY PROLNG OF A FENCE LN & POB TH N29* 18 37E ALG PROLNG & FENCE LN A TOTALDIST 96.68FT TO NELY END SD FENCE TH N80*56 03E 75.53FT TO ELY LN PRTY FRANCIS C & MARGUERITE R WILLIAMS BY DEED REC AF NO 952093 & THE TERMINUS OF THIS LN DESC PER AF NO 9203310033 I JZL677440. DOC;1 /00006.900150/ ) CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 *PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE* STATUS: READY TO ISSUE ENG20070415 I SIDE SEWER PERMIT (I -Single Family) Permit Number: ENG20070415 Expiration Date: 9/13/2008 Job Address: 16109 N MEADOWDALE RD, EDMONDS KATHRYN SALDIN MAM CONSTRUCTION 16109 N MEADOWDALE RD PO BOX 91 EDMONDS, WA 98026 KENT, WA 98035 206-747-5420 LICENSE #: MAMCO**095L4 EXP: 6/16/2009 N N 1 DESCRIPTION JREPAIR N PROPOSE TO REUSE LATERAL LID NUMBER GRINDER PUMP N PROPOSE TO REUSE SIDE SEWER SIDESEW ER N N EkSENIENTINFMNIATION I PROJECT CROSSES OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY VERIFICATION OF RECORDED EASEMENTS COMPLETE IADEMA7TY The Applicant has signed an application which states he/she holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or any ofits departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason ofgranting this permit. CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 24 HOUR NOTICE REQ UIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS THIS APPLICATION IS NOT PERMITUNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID. AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN SPACE PROVIDED. Printed:,Wednesdav, September 12, 20( FILECOPY INSPECTOR COPY SIMEET FILE ❑ APPLICANT COPY STATUS: READY TO ISSUE ENG20070415 • Refer to City of Edmonds Side Sewer Information handout for approved pipe materials, inspections and other requirements. • Maintain 10' separation between the sanitary side sewer and the water service line. • Condition of the e�dsting sanitary side sewer to be verified prior to obtaining approval for reuse. TV inspection required. Video to be submitted to City for review. • E-Sanitary Side Sewer Inspection • E-Engineering Final PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: IMTIAL: NOTES: PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL: NOTES: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED DATE: INITIAL: #P20 City. of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any .person preparing a Development Permit Application : for the City. of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas -are, or may be, present on the "subject property.' The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the -site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: I l I t2I UE2 City Receipt #• I ZJ Critical Areas File M 200 5 - O! '3-0 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant:_ I ( zi-OS A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist,. sign and date it, and submit it . ,to the City. The City will review the checklist,.make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along withthe signed copy of this form to'assisf City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on &s .form'.In addition, ,the applicant, shall include . other -pertinent information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration .on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City.of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, _ arising from any action :or infraction based in whole. or part. upon false, misleading, inaccurate . or. incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this applicationon the behalf of the owner as listed below.- SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT �� DATE /0 /31 /05 Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify.that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject Jand use'application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property. for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. - S' IGZ WURE.OF OWNER DATE .3 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner//AppHcant: . Name / 6 . /o 4 — Street Address f- , City . State Zip Telephone: d--S' 7 V 3 , iJo# 3 Email address (optional): Alw App licant Representative: , WkX* l7� Cam. Name ., z107e 16y qv� 5 Street Address . h6,�-. �So�FZ City State Zip Telephone: 'ZU6 -- �4 7r S1 2-0 Email Address (optional): #P20 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) L. Site Address/ Location: Z/A f �_.&- A Pwd 1 t_ Pd�• Lrnj��' a"-wtv A 10 f 2. Property Tax Account Number: __ tC6 L 3l 6 bbb L+% p.a; 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet) 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? V L. C ,5 Ln e".j C-C 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that'apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolluig: slopes on, site generally less than 15% :(a vertical rise bf. l0-feet over-. a horizontal distance of 66-feet): ` Hilly: slopes present on site of more thari`15% and less than 30°�6 (a vertical'rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than -30%- present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). ? Other (please describe): 6. Site con 'areas. ofyear-round standing water N_ ; Approz Depth 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ; Approx. Depth:.. . What season s)=of the year? 8. - Site is in°the floodway flo idplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or anarea where water flows across the grounds: surface?: Flows are year-round? 'N t7 Flows,are seasonal? : (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow' ;shrubs mined urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is. present on site: N� �\ For City Staff Use Only C P�S o 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? L 0 nob Q i V-F Vj . 2. Site is Zoned? I RR 5 — 20, 3. SCS mapped soil type(s) ? 4 � D Q v►� ti Z5-q-D'� 5l0 & 2: Aact,fA wDMA' q-r?Jl rtIlU 5a6dU 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? %��J v'.IYO�✓I 6Y1 I�-Utzq �d Z_. I,alnnAt9t1 dir, t-1-U+-LA", & 155h V w 0d1ifs Nzt007Mt UV15&,Yl ftn arca%A S. Site..within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? _ :N O - bU-� P?U.c t di n a o-C a a l DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER Reviewed by.__(Ain _ (1 Y1 CL, Do LL 1 d✓ Date: t 1 1/0 1) 5 ELI CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 16105 N. Meadowdale Road Tax Acct. Number: 00513100004802 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CA-2005-0170 Applicant: Kenneth M. Goff Owner: Kathryn B. Saldin CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CA-2005-0170) During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Erosion Hazard Areas, Landslide Hazard Area, and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through . 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. • Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. among others. • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. • Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.6. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet'the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS Since the site is within a mapped fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, the City would like to preserve as much of the native vegetation as possible. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ON A SITE WITH FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT CONSERVATION AREAS The applicant must submit a clearing/tree cutting plan with any development permit. Tree cutting and clearing of native vegetation shall be limited to the footprint of development. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Gina Coccia, Planner WZO& (filA" November 21, 2005 Name, Title U Signature Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 Message Page 1 of 1 Harrison, Marie From: Harrison, Marie Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:24 PM To: 'Ken Goff Cc: Gruwell, Meg Subject: RE: Permit application for single family residence Dear Ken: The Building Official has determined that the property at 16109 N Meadowdale Road lies within the designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area. Please refer to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 Building Permits - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas (this code became effective May 13, 1988). We actually sell building packets for development in this area. The building packet sells for $30.00. If you wish to purchase a packet, please drop a check in the mail and I would be happy to mail it to you. As far as two residences on one lot, I will need to refer you to the Planning Department. I will forward your email to Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner. Sincerely, Marie Harrison -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Goff [mailto:KGMAM@msn.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:04 PM To: Harrison, Marie Subject: Permit application for single family residence Hi: We will be applying for a permit to construct a new single family residence at 16109 North Meadowdale Road on a lot that presently has an existing single family home on it. The existing home is occupied by an elderly lady that will be sharing the new home with her adult daughter and her daughter's family. The existing home will be legally demolished and disposed of. Two questions: 1) Can you forward a submittal packet either via this e-mail electronically or via conventional mail to PO Box 91, Kent WA 98035 Attn: Ken Goff? 2) The normal routine for this project would be Hazmat inspection, demo and then new construction. Since the new structure will be occupied by the inhabitant of the existing structure, and it would pose a hardship on the owner, Kathryn Saldin, do you think it would be possible to post a bond insuring the removal of the existing structure after the Owner occupied the new structure? Ken Goff MAM Construction 9/18/2006 a a a 15520 15515 7215 15506 7111 7107 7101 7031 7009 - 15805 7222 15602 7124 7100 I 1560, \� 6817 .` W 702E I 15600 I • ' 15615 7110 15621 16816 N 6815 15606 Q 7120 15625 15610 0 N 7029 I 7019 15631 0. 6811 15620 n '7119 7117 . 6812 = 15631 ts70J 1s705 �/ � 15700 Ism 15715 15702 o ii 3 15706 15701 15719 15712 n 15709 15707 6808 6801 i 15714 / 15721 15728 15724 15722 15.729 15730 15725 _ 15720 ; 15730 15732 400 7324 15808 15800 15808 1 t5809 15814 � 15812 15821 15911 15814 15810 ,5et8 15824 515827 15828 15828 3 182s 15915 15824 W 15wo a 15805 Q i j 15904 F 15925 ' Sal O 1 T 15911 15907 15902 15910 ^ 15917 15910 l V p ' r 1 15927 15902 1s915 8907 15908 15906 j 15812 15917 7309 15920 c 7429 6815 15926 6921 6909 n i1 15931 t�TH ST $W 18723 18721 i7 16006 16012 16008 16010 6910 6820 16032 ,i 7220 6970 � MO 6916 6826 16034 16008 16024 16119 16115 16116 16031 16020 6960 16036 16010 C., ' 1 �� 6920 16038 16105 16118 16105 RR ' I Awake 16106 0 ^� �\6809 6803 q �62 6912 18111 c � `6` 18,20 6908 Moadowd18.—/ 16115 ^ 1`q }6216 6804 1 6 # 16122 10p 16131 16121 16 1�17 16116 D 162ND ST 1, 3 16202 16209 ^ 16209 YYY 16216 6925 g �6 ,{ • 16236 Q 18220 2�9 } 3dj 16220 16221 Z � �6 3 6g23 \ 6801 - N m 0 629. / 6806 e j 18310 M238 16228 4• ' 16311 7212 16222 16232 a• 16320 1�11 c � \ 68021 3 16315 « « 0 16318 116315 16320 m x 18�p 18319 3 16319 7316 er 6901 16340 q 7109 r 16323 18322 ro 16321 m �, 16400 7317 16410 18411 7404 n a 7114 6803. 7320 n n n 7110 7w 7m 7014 16420 0 16429 1 H PL SW 16419 , 7406 18508 16431 7314 ^ 7f110 6811 n n 16423 7C28 7020 ,1I 6801 Meadowdale 16510 !7 Commu ,Y 16520 16510 16500 16501 n " ('VQg7 C1�'b �Ty � • STREET FILE 6190.199- City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to. complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Greg Casper Name Property Owner Title 16100 N. Meadowdale Road Street Address Please call 1-1. 447-7745 Edmonds Wa 93020 H. 742-5997 Applicant Representative: Name Title Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Signature Date Critical Areas Checklist Site Information Project Name: Casper Short Sub.divisionpermit Number: Site Location: 16100 "1 '_`leadowdale Rd Property Tax Account Number: 5131-000-051-0108 Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 105,000 sq . f t . Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? No 1. Area was first logged around 1900 by Pope & Talbol General Site Conditions ?, 1 have done general cl eari nq over the last 6 years 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? Yes Date of most recent action: 1990 Soils=/ Topography T140 TYPES::.1.A1 derwood Gravely Sandy Loam 8 to 15% slope. 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? T4vo Types ) 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. 2 . Al derwood-r'verett Gravely Sandy Loam 25 to 70% slope Flat: less than .5 feet elevation change over entire site. X Rolling. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) X Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) X Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments I plan to .level 1`oplArap;� years Mi th rev Hydrology/VegetaVion keep steep.slopes in a substantia Lcal .ar.eas. have been ious developements. 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No. gr natural states relatively d several tines over the 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. No Approx. Depth: N/A 6. Site is in the floodway No floodplain No of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Yes flows are year-round? Yes Flows are seasonal? No 8. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ; shrubs ; mixed X 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: Yes 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: No 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: Yes For City Use Only / STUDY REQUIRED: Critical -areas study is required. ✓ CONDITIONAL WAIVER -'Critical areas study not required if specified conditions satisfied.' WAIVER: Critical areas study is not required. Determination Number.. l' - �vi - �e� .__ Reyiewe Planner Rey 3/27/92 �,rt3l7nin� �o c� idvniv� �r ��a :t��1llNaw rau rO�lvx1 (�Ih�JL�yNi) trx�,�l �4dN►a�1 d��Nv1h s6. g m p / -% , S \ \ \ <D yu Y \ \ rt \ / s�Vr�w r�9f G' Greg Casper 16100 N. Meadowdale Road Edmonds, WA 98020 November 4, 1992 C.ITV 01' -1,A)MONDS Community Services Department Planning — Divi-sioy, 250 - 5th Ave N. Edmonds, Wa `.)8o2() Attention: Robert CiIaVe. AICP Dear Mr. nave, EnclOsed 'S my SUb11!Jt.tai of the "Critical Areas Checkllist.", and a vicinity map for the Casper Short Subdlvisio!l at 1610, Meadowdale Road, Edmonds. 1 spoke to Yot! last month regarditiv the property in general anc in the conversation we discussed the proximity of the property to the "Meadowdale Lands! ide Hazard Area". The property a t3l) 10i -;I t t foota,-e FOOn?' its W(-!1,17." r 1) _jojjr, jru ita the area kno%fn as til-, "Y--dowdi'E an d C" e H A r eca �irea coma inorl in that -?% area `Hs 'in as.slgi!ed risk of s1J!Pnag(-! the lowest Percent-i-le. The g ,eolocrist tiiat 1 consulted WitteI , wbe! purcha!�ied ".110 i! 1986 ativ-1sed me that th,- probab-i-jit, n y 0 f !slippage in t 1, P t er c. a i ; !, i = . In Tconstructed a sin.gl- family residenct! under permlt number 370622. At tha4l time -it 1q,-Is determined that the "Meidowdale Landslide qazalrc Are!" rec-IJ!'ements were not to my lot. I WO j! 4 ke to keep tjje, a .pp1i,-ation ane. anprov- _ 1. or Meadowd:,i 1 e L;11110S !J de flaaz,Ard 4re2 If you hal.�e tint q, Iq! St.; U.'Is (!Fjse Best Regards. ca� RTrt Greg Casper net (206)447-7745 AgU "OAS WT. ,_City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Greg Casper Determination #: CA92-228 Project Name: Permit Number: N/A Site Location 16100 N Meadowdale Road - south side of N Meadowdale Road and approximately 300 feet east of 72nd Avenue W. Project Description: Property Tax Acct #: 5131-000-051-0108 The 2.4 acre site.is characterized by fairly level topography near N. Meadowdale Beach Road and steep inclines on the southwestern portion. A year around creek traverses the property in a north/south direction. TWo dwellings are sited on the southeastern quarter of the property. Considering the steep inclines on the southern portion of the property, the site is probably categorized as a potential "geologically hazardous area" and possibly a "Steep Slope Hazard Area" in accordance with ECDC Section 20.15B. 020. The submitted plan does not appear to be scaled; consequently, a definitive classification of the property cannot be made until a scaled topographical map is submitted. The applicant has indicated that the subject property may be short platted in the future. The current proposal, however, does not include a development plan. Consequently, staff has determined to conditionally waive any further sensitive area review of the site until a development proposal, either in the form of a building plan, clearing or grading permit; or,a subdivision, has been submitted. WAVEMOC CA 92-228 Conditional Waiver Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): XX_ There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; XX_ The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX_ The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX_ The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. A geotechnical study indicating the feasibility of site development shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to any site development or land use permit application, including but not limited to a clearing and grading permit, building permit, or subdivision. 2. The proponent shall not disturb any site vegetation until the Planning Division has reviewed a clearing proposal and issues a clearing permit or an appropriate form of approval. Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study, associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code, until such time when a development proposal is submitted.. Name �' Signature~ . Date CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ih c 1 g90 Planning • Building • Engineering May 17, 2006 Ms. Kathryn Saldin 16109 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Property Line Location Information Handout Dear Ms. Saldin: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR As we discussed over the phone on Monday, May 15, the setbacks for building on your lot are measured from your property line. I've enclosed a handout that describes how the property lines for your lot may be located. Unfortunately, it appears that the ROW width is not constant in front of your property. This will make it very difficult to accurately locate front property line without using a professional surveyor. I hope you find the enclosed information useful. If you have any further questions or if there is any additional information I can provide, please don't hesitate to call me at (425) 771-0220. 2Sincere �-1 AMON K. ROTH Stormwater Engineer Enclosure DKR/cmc S:\ENGR\Datmn\LETTER-Saidin-prop-line-handout.doc 0 Incorporated Auqust 11, 1890 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT I p Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 8 g � _ 19 October 29, 1992 Kathryn Saldin I A 16105 1/2 N. Meadowdale Road Edmonds, WA 98020 ; 91rc", LAURA M. HALL MAYOR Re: Address Change A recent review of addressing in your areaitt resulted in a change of address to several residences, and broughtthe City's attention that your address of 16105 1/2 N. Meadowdale Road is not consistent with either City addressing policies or the County addressing grid. It is City addressing policy not to approve "1/2" designations, and, if in use, we try to correct by assigning a new address. We realize this may cause some inconvenience, but it is important that addressing be as correct as possible --particularly in cases of an emergency. Therefore, your address has been changed from 16105 1/2 N. Meadowdale Road to 16109 N. Meadowdale Road: It is not possible to just drop the "1/2" designation, as another residence, addressed as 16105 N. Meadowdale Rd, has undergone address change and your mail could possibly go to the other parties old address for up to a year. The City will notify all applicable City departments of the change. It will be your responsibility to notify all others, including the Post Office, and post new house address numbers within 10 days of receipt of this letter. Thank you, Sharon Nolan Permit Coordinator cc: Fire Department Police Department Public Works Utility Billing Address Files Street Files • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan UJ J LL RECEIVED CITY of EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT For Inspection Call 771-3202 ``� �� 1��� PERMIT NO. 07263 PUBLIC WORKS Address of Construction: �.5 �� N , /1/1 f:' A boW oA z Property Legal Description (Include all easements): S'./ S LYNNWOOD LINE Owner and/or Builder: Z' 0 NEE- TELL Contractor & License No: (9'�iti'fl,�.• Single Family Residence Multi - Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) r PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify that I have read and shall &omply Date with the items listed on the back. Permit Fee: 30 Issued By:%-Q���s L :. Trunk Charge: Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments c Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date In t4t 1 oRejected: Reason Date Initial a� ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** a� White Copy File Green Copy Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant c�a" 6g Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO_ ------------ _ ------ _________________________ h1ERD. coNN . NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ LID NO. _2►O____-_-ASMT. NO_ __________________ ut�tE _.__P 1_t�U�SEI..I..�._ STEM .NS__________________ CONTRACTOR .�TE ---- _EAU SZ__________..._..______-_-_______-._.___...__.._ PERMIT NO. -/- !3__- OWNER ... �/j -• - n ^ JOB ADDRESS __.I_�L�l /Z._. �! Q_:_�-•-�L�•=--►L�•-----•••••-• LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ______________________________________ BLOCK NO. _LYNN�'�OOD LINE --------------------------------------------------------•---......-----....___._._......-•----------------•-----• ................................................ ZNAME OF ADDITION --------------------------=--------------•------------------........................................................ 0 m o - 4rc.o.W'JE c.c.cAP G" DP 0 p r I et �Q��• 4.5'OP- (�'•cA.WyE . V C.O.c AP 11DP i 4is'.` Itm POLE 1(0105y2 No. PjEAOowoALE Ro . f Approved: / cy / DATEC ..... By BY • f -11175 (REV.11/78) = E / — • Office of Citv Engineer Ms. .Tune Pinnell 16105 1� forth Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington 98020 • STREET FILE March 30, 197E SUBJECT: Realignment of North Meadowdale Road Right-of-way Dear Ms. Pinnell: In reference to your request for data on the realignment, we recommend that you petition among ,your neighbors and present the petition to the City requesting action to prepare deeds and to establish appro- priate public hearings to vacate the old right-of-way. The City presently has a map showing a proposed right-of-way location. We will be happy to supply you with a copy of this map in vour efforts to Work out a solution with your neighbors. The petition should take the format of a letter to the City signed by the property owners on either side of the road. If you have any further questions on this, release contact us. Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS RICHARD P. ALLEN Assistant City Engineer RHA:mjr REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT t1976 ,,-MAKE REMITTA CES PAYABLE TO: K I R K E I E V E R S SNOHOMISH COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON '` :S OF ALL STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, SNOHOMISHC UNTY TREASURER SCHOOL, AND ROAD TAXES. EVERETT WA 98206 L E V Y MARKET VALUE - T A X CODE RATE LAND BUILDINGS TOTAL GENERI L SPECIAL 0 1 f �.pltii YOUR TAX DOLLARS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE FOLLOWING TAX DISTRICTS: +, STATE i COUNTY CITY OR ROAD/ LIB. SCHOOL DISTRICT PORT'DISTRICT -OTHER J w FIRE DISTRICT HOSPITAL WATER SEWER - FOREST FIRE DIKE NO. DRAIN NO. NAME AND ADDRESS ! '`'" 1 `'".' t = LEGAL DESCRIPTIION•.,` 07 I •. •" JI r PLEASE PRINT CHANGE OF TAXPAYER NOTICE: OR CHANGE OF ADDRESS BELOW -i ADDRESS ZIP CITY STATE CODE i Wg�/ts FIRST HALF MUST BE PAID BY APRIL30 OR ENTIRE TAX PLUS INTEREST MUST BE PAID. SECOND HALF DELINQUENT AFTER OCT. 31ST. TAX UNDER S10 00 TO BE PAID IN FULL. N ., S ACCOUNT NUMBERER 11.103176 . 1976 1976 FULL TAX LESS EXEMPTION, IF ANY 1 FULL CHECK BOX TO 9 INDICATE FULL OR 7 ELF I HALF PAYMENT 6I 'OMtIOD=COW.DEtINQUENT;T",NQT INCLLJDED RJYABgy ' - I QRE;fd!QSf1RE5,M.7:'��.;�?e�-y. • CHECK ❑ M.O. ❑ DELINQUEiJT CASH ❑ i„) o o tj � J eoX445r-1 r.o.J w/e1 7/� AL ONLY ^4-7 a POaAA.-opdie-5 ._ . STREET FILEI�= /- 7G W10NaS ro : 3Kz7 A Lb CO, wood - 8 A'i1'ol�F�1 : CNET ��t�rly�ii ��t- o1s9 PL�gS� i�ctrrtf�/ SOTN of US ABOUT A" CoKlCE Ru ENQ #JEADow04l£ kD . M09r..'s (a"7f$EU"1)cNW Pud. Leg zio cVJtic& A✓E. -300- ky-It IM, y•toa ELEVATION=295.6' 20 � 4"0 PVC ROOF DRAIN TO DETENTION, TYP. _ SEPARATE 4" ROOF AND \ FOOTING DRAINS, TYPICAL � 1 F C13#3, TYPE 1 L'- RIM ELV. 251.00 IE 246 30 24 CPEP OUT SE IE. 249.50 4" PVC ROOFDRAIN IN E FOUND 1/2" REBAR & C4P "9891" -� ,� • ` \ \ _ ip� _ ELEVATION=281.7' 4" CLEANOUTS, TYPICAL \ ATTIC' s:E 4C; \\ ,LL �p�jS� i.} TO? 270', TOE 266' TOP 270 , TOE 264 FG ELV. 252.0' \ APN 00543>00004802 - �Z \ F \ \ \• co m �- D TOP 269.8', TOE 262.5' �, • . OF OS7I - 2s0 \ �' NEW REINF CONC WALL PER STRUCTURAL ` ' " ` ` lr y�yp \ \ \ \ \ ,4\ o R \ CAL AND DETAILS TYPICAL SEE WALL EXI,iT?sdir � xr:.1E}) .'::ICc: �1p 6' . � O HELL FOR BCiiIIt:;,RY , IINE PER INS3RUNI°.ENT FTp �\ \ THIS SHEET RI:.:;. N.10. I i1' si e 2 \ 25 4"0- `cTR. N \. g8 254 25cprA� ,� 261 \ \ i e I Y i3�is'6s9::f° 13 L ~f Il7�i i C� \ i \ � . tel: , � 'Ps CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STUB TO OLD HOUSE; LOCATION SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE. CONNECT NEW SANITARY SEWER ` SERVICE TO EXISTING SEWER STUB, EXISITNG CONDITION OF THE SEWER \24s ` \ \ LATERAL TO BE VERIFIED BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE SIDESEWER; CONTACT TIM HARRIS AT 425-771-0235. INSTALL CLEANOUTS \ AT 90' BENDS AND AT EVERY OTHER 45' BEND, INSTALL A 6" CLEANOUT W/ LOCKING 12" CAST IRON LID AT THE R.O.W. LINE FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP "G-4 i INC 9435" 0.9' E. & 0.5' N. l w ELEVA1I0N=245.6' j d < •C F;^ L;C; JTI �v 'WO 0D'; FErCE \ I s 6 \ I::Y.I ING 4` \ `: i TIE NEW WATER SERVICE INTO EXISTING �� WATER METER, REMOVE EXISTING WATER ! CB (TYPE 2; " '� \ SERVICE TO THE OLD HOUSE GRATE•-231.471II I iE:ifJYrj-:?2�5. 3"i24" `l I 57.p3•g7"W I L=7.63 1 IF::.;>E:j='2.26.12'24"RCP' N ; IE(1NE'=224.9 4"f'a}lvt 1 I �EQ C 4yly J SID :> '022 E91T. 13215 ^r 425-771 SID -'0. •- r~rm""`�an �� .» % SS." YEN_. .?•" ..•--•.•" ; O• ,u S,`- N ~� w _v'N a olo LA O FOUND PK NAIL HELD FOR CENTERLINE P.T. CUT & FILL VOLUMES: CUT VOLUME DWY CUT = (1000 SF X 1.5 FT) + (2700 SF X 0.5 FT) = 2850 CIF = 105 CY FOOTING CUT = 200 LF X AVG 2 FT X 2 FT WIDE = 800 CF = 30 CY TOTAL CUT VOLUME = 3650 CIF = 135 CUBIC YARDS THE MAXIMUM FILL VOLUME EQUALS THE EXCAVATED CUT VOLUME AND IS TO BE PLACED IN THE STOCKPILE / PERMANENT FILL AREA AS INDICATED ON THE TESC PLAN. DETENTION PIPE 36LF 24"0 CPEP @17. MAX LOT COVERAGE FOOTPRINT TOTAL LOT AREA = 18,400 SF W/O EXISTING BLDG SHELL: NEW HOUSE 2016 SF NEW PORCH 96 SF NEW DECK 288 SF TOTAL NEW 2400 SF - 13% W/ EXISTING BUILDING SHELL: NEW 2400 SF EXIST 768 SF TOTAL 3168 SF - 17% 1 FT MIN WIDTH BETWEEN ROCKS AND EXCAVATION. PROVIDE SWALE, GRADE AND DRAIN TO APPROVED SYSTEM. 12" OF COMPACTED SOIL OVER GEOTEXTILE BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE NATIVE SOIL IF DRY AND NON -ORGANIC, OR USE GRAVELLY, SANDY FILL WHERE NECESSARY. 21-1rtr MqX I......:.......� : ;......... ........... 10. J i•-�.�i i i ROCK FILTER LAYER, 12„ MIN. WIDTH QUARRY SPALLS, 3/4" TO 4" IN SIZE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC, TYP. , f� DRAIN ROCK, 12"MIN. WIDTH 3/4" TO 2" IN SIZE 4" PERF PVC DRAIN PIPE, SLOPE TO DRAIN AND CONNECT _ TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, PROVIDE CLEANOUTS UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK, AS REQUIRED R 2' SHY DISTANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE WALL 2' MIN. FACE AND EDGE OF PRIVATE DRIVEWAY. CAST IN PLACE AROUND 4" PVC DRAIN, SEE PLAN REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE'`�J.�,l'�� REFER TO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS PACKAGE FOR WALL 1 �- DIMENSIONS AND REINFORCING SPECIFICATIONS �O/v e j Zone 5 -,7-0 Corner Flag Set .....•�..- � ,,,,,,,,:,:: ��, � �. �y� � Fronts Required Actual \ Sidesihln l© -fa fit/ 1 i � \ FG ELV. 270.1 8f, OVERH�rG, Tl(P. ,pia ) II 1 / Rear $3 n' )( Other `` 7p L 8"CPEP ®1 .29% � /\ � S54'3T42"W � � i 1 '-gh _ 21.40' Wel t L=19 47 R�07. 9 e 2'03' t� �p\� 1 L I\� I t ` l ♦ � `� � ! "` FOUND 1 /2" REBAR &CAP ' p�' �t "9891" 2.0' BELOW SURFACE - ti '-TOP N T=256.7 \ r �` \ \ i� ELEVATION=266.4 I I I1111 t l:.a 2r J Jo � A. i1 1{v;;{'ECi Ir71 REQUIRED_ Sc: L=272.94 R=4 7.6. ,32 44-1 (CI TY OF ED NDS 0 �D i r / ' w 1 «,"„n< 7�-� :Ef 'TER Ci-;,•,NNE2 =2 2.26 8" I.PIS SE _. 11 1 N NCE t.J�:�Y �V - ._ i ~�co .& NW,x{�., <CC. No. 1 85� f i, i A-0 <`l y \ ` V13YY ^•......w........... ��'l Y' .-... ......,...."\ �/ lYf,Y� '^.1., it I v � `i. '�^¢>o,,,.oa t �` Hv/ otv � G GRATw ::24P-9^ RIM=2 ., .<38 . CENT CH:;f� N _.�,38C 9, fEtN=>fs`;•-242. ,° (2Er"Ri,P) IE."3:::)~2.4•2.7 9(24 :CF>) PIPES SE & i ;>t :. I,...fNE-244.�.,:(-I4 PVi:7 IZP,1=260, 2. .� )- CENTEr:: 4" PVC WYE, TIE FOOTING DRAIN AND 6" PIPES, SEI,,4} „ _._.._._ CD : T YPE 1; \ C: Syr O 79:i2+ DETENTION DISCHARGE PIPE TO EXISTING 4 STUB ,P.ATE=2G2•t31 CB#1, CONC INLET W. VANED GRATE f},_ 25 ; .x, ,,,,_ _ 1 # RIM ELV. 257.60 IE SE)=2� 2 CB 4, TYPE 1L, CONTROL STRUCTURE 7,g 1 2'4" r : IM ELV. 250.00, W/SOLID LID IE. 255.10 6 CPEP OUT NE " °• •1 I/ 6" PVC RISER AND 7/8" ORIFICE PER CB;ll2, TYPE 1 W. VANED GRATE DMONDS STD DETENTION SYSTEM RIM ELV. 259.85 :. 246.00 4" PVC OUT SW IE. 255.00 6"CPEP IN SW :. 246.00 24" CPEP IN NE IE. 255.00 8"CPEP OUT NW :. 247.00 8" CPEP IN SE IE. 257.00 6"PVC IN NE r 41R1E s � �Iv P`_ : 9v N o0 a. � 51.9'( 260 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: IF NEW ONLY: DECK 288 SF STRUCTURE 2112 SF OVERHANGS 309 SF DRIVEWAY 1530 SF STAIRS/STOOPS 108 SF TOTAL 4347 SF - 247 IF KEEP EXISTING BLDG SHELL: EXISTING 768 SF OVERHANG 140 SF TOTAL 5255 SF - 29% A-261 B-252 C-263.5 D-274 AVG. 262.62 ACTUAL 287.00 ALLOWED 287.62 AVERAGE LOT SLOPE: 50.6' IN 155' NORTH 24' IN 100' MID 3' IN 21' SOUTH 77.6' / 276' = 28% AVG SL BY: PACIFIC GEOMATIC SERVICES, INC. LAND SURVEYING & MAPPING SERVICES MOUNTLAKE TERRACE. WA 98043 PHONE: (425) 778-5620 FAX: (425) 775-2849 PGS INC WEB: www.PccGeoinc.com &a � B, JUN 29 2007 DUCITY O pEDMOTMI ND' { o1 F-�, f c o W a� F- Z 01 o.. a Z 0 d (L V L:CL CL w U V) m'' 0 o 0 z 0 O m N Z W Q0 � d r) O >- cn mr < o W O Z Q W L IL ST00 o 0 U, J N w 0 a 0 N o N II to 0 u d :E z tr 0 m I' 3 0 m o 1 m (D m R. w Z of (w w x z Q zw j cV S z 0000 N r � z rn 00 z I w Ld Q .- .- z 4 Z z U C14 �e-, e_" W 00 ILL, U En 4 .OEn N' �y of Z W �Fi v 5J 9 CON �... CV 8 � 7 A�, V � O V) m 0 r ` \ i 246�: SAVE TREE, TYPICA -� FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP "G-4 INC 9435" 0.9' E. & 0.5' N. ELEVATION=245.6' FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP "G-4 INC 9435" ON PROPERTY LINE FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP •300, "G-4 INC 9435" / ELEVATION=295.6 / CLEARING LIMITS, TYPICAL 9 FOUND 1/2" REBAR & CAP "9891" �28p� ELEVATION= 281.7' GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 IN ET -'-'-•270 --_ � ` �\\ \ \�2 1 in h YE20,f� el CONSTRICTION SEQUENCE 1. MARK CLEARING LIMITS 2. ESTABLISH CONSTRUCTION ACCESS 3. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC SILT -FENCES AND CATCH BASIN PROTECTION 4. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRADING 5. STABILIZE EXPOSED SOILS IN LANDSCAPE AREAS BY SEEDING OR A COMBINATION OF SEEDING AND MULCHING OR NETTING. 6. STABILIZE NEW DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTING A 4" COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK BASE AND FINALIZE CONSTRUCTION, FINNISH DRIVEWAY PAVING. 7. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER ALL DISTUR13ED SOILS ARE STABILIZED AND AFTER APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. vo - I 18.30.050 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL STANDARDS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2 FOOT CONTROL ESC )PLAN. \ \ A. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ALL ACTIVITIES NECESSITATING A CLEARING OR GRADING APAr 00513100004802 % PERMIT AND ALL UTILITY PROJECTS CONSISTING OF MORE THAN 500 LINEAL FEET OF f TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DURING / \ \ \ \ r CONSTRUCTION AND TO PERMANENTLY STABILIZE EXPOSED SOIL RESULTING FROM vONSTRUCTION. PROJECTS INVOLVING A CRITICAL AREA MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED TO --� / j UaMPLY WITH ANY COMBINATION OF THE ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. C!JIuIPL1ANCE WILL \ s f DEMONSTRATED THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AN APPROVED ESC PLAN. Fp \ j� , �\ \ \ ; O� \\ \ o�� l GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING ESC PLANS ARE PROVIDED IN THE MANUAL THE PLAN MUST TO'fix? \ ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: is 1. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE. C \ f' CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE {; i ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL �; . �•,, `so all C \ �' \ BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF `L Q rr' \ Yr �ry �r•,F !r SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE, ' `.' \ C� \ - `� t THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT'.: '�•, ' �� SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED `•.� \ I \ TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. STREET WASHING SHALL 57'0347..w 'H o: N N Y- N ss GS WGS O r . ......______- cn '� 6„X6» ton wx J70, l'v'44.-k3 2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL S'OILS EXPOSED '�'Ii yi •�•' • • • OF - _ BMPS, INCLUDING, • . COVERING.••: VEGETATION, S54.37-42"W r MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE �'!I3' ♦ ' ^ : \ 21.40' J;` STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE. (TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN ♦ \ I j EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). ♦♦ ; ` f :1 FOUND REBAR &CAP 2.0' "9891" BELOW SURFACE 3. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT '� - ♦ \ \ ..~�~ ELEVATION=266.4' PROPERTIES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT DEPOSITION BY APPROPRIATE USE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS OR FILTERS, DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINATION OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. / 3D �\ \ � \j1 -� ~`"'~ 4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER TO ENSURE L=272.24 R=47 � �� f - ......... ....... _ _........_...... 7.69 N A2. _u 7 '` \ ( CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL MAINTENANCE: AND REPAIR .c 44 SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. �,Qj� 5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT - OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, OTHER (Cl TY OF E ONDS ORDI N �Sr�dYp:..,. , <o ~~•~~,,,�~7f ~~ - APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE _ .. _ .... �. NCE N0. 185) {' ` t �iF l ~ ~~.... co vy 0*1 FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE, TYPICAL, ------- ss-'"�� ;a a PER CITY OF EDMONDS.. TD. DETAIV E1.1 qS W+ ivy `t Lid' FOUND PK NAIL HELD FOR CENTERLINE P.T. STOCKPILE / FILL AREA FOR EXCAVATED EARTH; 2H:1V MAX. FILL SLOPE, AND --- �" MAINTAIN DOUBLE SILTFENCE DOWNHILL OF STOCKPILE. USE PLASTIC SHEET COVERING BEFORE INCLEMENT RAIN STORMS OR WHEN STOCKPILE IS UNWORKED FOR 48 HOURS DURING OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 OR UNWORKED FOR 7 DAYS DURING MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30. COMPACT PERMANENT FILL UPTO MAXIMUM ELV. 252 IN 6" LIFTS, APPLY HYDROSEEDING, OR SEEDING AND MULCHING PER EROSION CONTROL NOTES CUT & FILL VOLUMES: CUT VOLUME DWY CUT = (1000 SF X 1.5 FT) + (2700 SF X 0.5 FT) = 2850 CF = 105 CY FOOTING CUT = 200 LF X AVG 2 FT X 2 FT WIDE = 800 CF = 30 CY TOTAL CUT VOLUME = 3650 CF = 135 CUBIC YARDS THE MAXIMUM FILL VOLUME EQUALS THE EXCAVATED CUT VOLUME AND IS TO BE PLACED AS NOTED ABOVE IN THE STOCKPILE / PERMANENT FILL AREA AS INDICATED. APPLIED. "-. 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUCTION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LIN ES SHALL. SPECIFICALLY F 0:: �.•~~ ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS; B. THE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT WITH SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERATIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES; " \ C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT STABILIZE NEW DRIVEWAY WITH 4 COMPACTED DEPTH FILTER FABRIC CATCH BASIN PROTECTION, TYPICAL, PONDS, OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS); CRUSHED ROCK IN PREPARATION OF PAVING .,PER CITY OF EDMONDS STD. DETAIL E1.3 D. TRACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING; E. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE. - CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 20' X 25', 12" DEPTH QUARRY SPALLS PER CITY OF EDMONDS STD. DETAIL E1.2 SUMEM BY: PACIFIC GEOMATIC SERVICES, INC. LAND SURVEYING & MAPPING SERVICES MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043 PHONE: (425) 778-5620 FAX: (425) 775-2849 PGS INC WEB: www.PocGeolnc.com `% al c z Y. 0 �ra Q J Z O O co Oct O w U � O Q O a_ w C.1 Q m�. w co 0 0 0 z RESUE+" JUN 29 2007 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS 0 CC o cm Z W • co ;2 i' 0 • tL 0 N C N V o N II cn 0 m V O m C- o m w Z j z � O w Ld O Q z X `t LL. z � Ld N `S m ¢ON00 �ce z- �ccoo0000 �z N t\ I I wW 0 L / � cq Lo N Z Z ONO WNN > T- Y�� Uvvi .t] E z o ` � `4- N -� N u 0 U n L V V 7 D D \I 0 E 0 rn Cd w N i z 0 E a N N O O O N O.. L� R E: Its U B JUN 2 9 2007 *3VILDI 0 DEPARTMENT OIL'OF EDMONDS RFICEE! ,LmLE ,. .. _, ,... ,. . r , F �, .y .«y , . k..:. r/p r„,«,.g> „i3,'?" I. N¢ `^.''+,'': "Ftp'' , ` :.# y ryy. ... „ .,,q4 ,,x� s r r ,Y «T y�y c t : :. ."s�! J t4 '., M +k $ ", , r .. EI . w , . •. ,y#, + r ,.,, i,.g t o- tk•• 'R"tit .. . �. e .: , � ik �S. '� :. •w ..: ,�C,�'", a d re. wu ,..qy V t , , ,tl' r a x,,.. r 'u. .. :{ } ,.$., ... ,�a �. .. +�a t l 5 ,?, ,C^ & .. .,. t } a' , J' -w"f.' �r t ,.r : x>l" .. s �'r .. r r r .a �' fir. ! , � .� r"! '' .. &t�. .tY. 1 , �` A X 1 "t ' : u w F 7 r' ,�. .. < , } a t'}kl r , y Y r ¢ f 4 ,..d r` k , •,. e r > ,, 1 a � wa w, w z a 'ti �" Y r' YI •, « 3 .Vi n rr , r, r M l t 'ti .�` fir.: S t �S 3a P � t+ ,rt >6 .. ,. r , +' .Y !' . a ,?a„ ���"'�'�@ �,�,:•r�,�, .gs�a:�"r ..�i�,i.,ar r ,r �I ;�,, .,*I'r1 #`R,a y. k '� ,t t � „^�R5 �';y��i,s �",•It6saa, +, a e F }".V�w �:i, 1 7��`_.'� .1�. �.-:.;.I.!'g, �.. ., -4I. I7, ' ;',��"� i'..",,,1', I�. ". � :' I�.,. II. 1� .:'_). ,-,...-. �,�.iZ o*..I'l %'..1.:I:1/..',,..IU. I - ":. � -'., —I. ." Ii..., . . I� . / I I$I -I. I JI-I I�"A:I I h..0".I 1,� rN... . _"11 .1-_,�,II �- i V rt '? ( 1 f- . 4I1I-�:F- II1 II ., ��Ci,I4��... 1 ,1 .I %['_.C,_,,-\,\.% - f-I .rC.-45Ir J !1-A1,7 $II.._-tI;o,, .IIIp. I.-�_§--�1 1:1!*1I1� 10.I �1 I _a -III _-- I.I -...,_ _�I _I I,I. -_-,_�:1i-,\ �-�I4 % .I � a1 - - �. _I/.. - -___I_"I- 1I ,"--; �(_'II -w__,.-,I-N , I1I �-... �\ � I1-:I1_A - . . t kI�" � !' 1 w ..1I��I -,.. ) : -' J '< 1 ,h .i t. t --, \I.SJ (4-iis('.i. 1N,:w� '�.. _- -1 0 ,"I�-S -I�f,� `i' i I , A 'k" .4 '.i 't '• r; Y Y I { !t =1 I r t t I r 1 r .r._\-..� a 4 r` 'i :7,. ,. 1 5 4 I p 'N t it yy.f, I' t . 9` � d1. d J , r s' ••f ` 4 -J'N '. t- i y Y } 'l t' - �Il'V r V , �: - I. N qq Z 9 u :t t "tn 1 1T., . Yi t A S a �: i' t ' r :v :1 '� r . t f. k A i� r ai�: ''' ,41_tit� \,I ..�i 3 'tt >r s: !` ink. .:,4 y �f 4'{� .!� y'. �+ k 'tj ii 7 i�1' nrt ( ;4 rl•, 'f £ 4 ,r ,M'If '£.I.r .} F : :;, 5'1'„ f�'V�"i>I {tj"4' '`} r h hr.,...,dk°3r5-�S`1'Ak' i 1'!1:r } , - i. - -t , 1 :q., �.'r5 il, !,.i�}r'.. al,',.• 'Sl",K I,rY,lt •j'I, M.i,{� �I-s. t' t ' tL _ r - _ } ri:. _ :� .f, ��nl i ` : #' itl }i it tr i�pt erlt fade Chapter 19.05 •sites designated within or near the r ' : t %, >., r o L S t1d f e 1i aT..., 11 '54411.be de'si naffed on -this ma which indicates areas of earth ,k 1:.:+; 41•' , , d .t, sir r„ ,.: g P ; r ' r� 1. .gib tri p atid'�and5llde:'hazartis n, less. o£ pormal alloavances. t ' p ., %{ '. •t "� '} t -I , I. // ,,c/ �-- _ - _ .. _ -.�/ - �� �' .. t I 7 , r 8 " p;� i cJer.:f td "x sr6date'.� 'the -subject project development located at �l�l ,/+r• - - — _ - `\ r tr� d, .r' arY: y, i ��+-�'~� - �_ \` Doi+. '.,•`:• }iSr. '' Edmonds Washington, the following maps, surveys or other noted + _ i � ' ;/ - 2 C � __ _ � � � ,,;;> ;t > ��+' ` 'iteri1s'below.vYere ur'sed: ` - :-- ______ - �:� -- - �`� , - \ /},} 1 t ,. s _ I, r _ y iesa��t i « Y. • Geojechnic"al'Report Prepared by I - —��' _ _ - - r ' -� _ - ,. 4, .Y;ayy mot' Xp Y, ,> ', y: Land'Survey,-Prepared by .war .`, L.�. �L,S i Q _ - - / !, ,, \: :' t , - # 31 I' t r/IiLVI,y V J .I t 9 1 .• t e - r ."~� `�\� '� A J :r i;,' b> - 1 1. ..'. 4, ,, ,4 u -» Fr4 ,,3 ," r„j L,'certify.W er.,penalty of perjury that the site location designation has been made to the best of my 1 ° -►-- - AD - ,� - ` �\ - ' �, ., "¢ ,.4}sib'. i-� '.�- lc�iowled e and belie' ,followin an investigation of all information and documentation in m ossession as \ , / �� 1t�hf lrI � it .,, g,.. g g Yp \' / >"`„�.� \��. x ��� "I r• ' r, My 'Yt ; . well'as: reasonably obtainable information in the ppssessio"h of others, including public agencies. Any t , , �. ,� -- /� \ \ '' 4 . lr �� } • nfo�trtatiori' which would tend to designate a differing location for the site is attached as a part of my 2 ` \\\ ' �` a - ' ? e destg,, ... as Well as alinformation upon which I reasonably relied. �;:• 1 ) v .,„ ) ti tw ^ ` I • � �, a :' V" _ _ _ram � 1 (� ` \ �o ` $ 'z'��ted'by L.` Date %d�©� ' l , - ) I 4 a.„ r r F' /t y j + Q 11 _ I It ( i , a4i I i i ,Slgndd' ' . Date !G/�D10� o q 1 ' � - I. 1 tt , ' p �. . 1 1 %A y �a i, .p} ,9 , ^� " in LD- ,) ®.tom. �l \\ „ i off , 1 k .. �!, 4 ; '1 - . `' ^ . I JIrr• t N1.V> 1 - V# �� w+'Y� ��� �j / r1 �7J,. I ` 'II;��,. �� HAZARD t s. � � t ' _ II I ( ; # i F iY s, / . r� � � A 1 { �� I ..i \ I l l 11 f+ 1 9 _ .v r t F :Ii__�►'�... tDE TIF.IED_ ._ , /�i ti- , ko ` , \.�, / I t I �I �� I , J 1I, ''jj' " • 2. HAlARDS FROM ENCROACHING LANDSLIDE . � ,-,�j r.J 3. HAZARDS FROM GROUND FAILURE IN MATERIAL THAT '*y 1 r 1 1 �`� '' /'/'�1�7■ I�1 \! :l,, t•, I r 1 / I I - i!e fi / HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY FAILED �., -h i : -_ =I 'i4 .'HAZARDS FROM .GROUND FAILURE IN PREVIOUSLY `h.� ( �t��11'�l1 -;'aI: t 11rn 't , , y{ ., 11 ,.,.j K. r�'y� µx`W k %AILI�D MATERIAL / `� 3 \ �--i ', mil- ` "i 11 r s. f 'r -�/ - ;=; . ~�~ I' ' 1`- :I I U `fi{ �, ; ter~ r ,F`'; ,i`,I C it, µ�l •.Vr V►dVV ' - �. f , I .a,y a«r{. Grp ff 1 x 4 {r 'MF F'q'.d-Y' ✓ , , •` I - I t, \ \ '�� I I '! \ a-`- l - I ; \�r��...�/'�' ,4, 'L; I -,,1 , I A. SLUtAPS 1 - - � ' IAA,- , . k t I ( iI ; t, . t k", 4. �C,}1 ^�� ' , B: • bEBR1S. SLIDES -(- ' \• t `, I _ �r' • r C] ,,�'}�ryr - ' ' n`,."f n V `fir }� J 4.J I t'•?�!k�F - ' f' ,� ..a»:' ,6� DEBRIS AVALANCHES I , ` �� _ - - \ \ -_- }, V. r,,tu �',, o D. "DEBRIS FLOWS �( 1 I t _\ ; _j )�r r 4 A ,,r �, ztr r, ''•�'IROBASILITY , I �� - _�'=' �''F -� r{ . ,',. I-s I PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE DURING A 25-YEAR �,` ' ' \ /7+ I t.••� (l - I _ ,1� 1, . ;# ry't `PERIOD. -IN PERCENT!*) / � I, I � ( // � -v Ik J r J, � - �,` i( R"' ,'tt, }k,.. 4 9M I II I � 1 /'/ "►. 1 ` aI /' }� "a4 i n , tl , k (' h,'I .tX ISLE . A 90 �� - I'•' i/ I II , \l \\� ,.�. i-- � r I 1 I . w+ � P r y, J y,Fi, r f'.LOCATION�:..WITHIN THIS MAP UNIT ARE GENERALLY SUBJECT r 11 >/rt ?' i I `�-� 1 ''1 �.� -�^' O "~ ^t: { k.r,: dF S;IwM:1. c ,': t II' ` .� 2 �� "' 1 I �, --•• `�... - �` I', 7t t,' TO.GROUNb-FAILURE l4AZARD FROM AN EXIStING SLUMP, ' j r; J 2 r „� ; it �.' � �"�, } ;- ."'X ; r; rWITH A 90 PERCENT PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE r '! 1 I I 1 ``- I I I ' � ,�! � t r ; , -=1__, 0 Cr' `� NUIiNG A 28=YEAR PERIOD. �'� ey IrY<i Ik �` ['f r ! �... .y l Is \ / r J II /'`�+• r^i.r� y J Y fl _ T! "it tt rV is la :;"� i ✓ r ' ! �`� ' a, 5 ��liJ, 1 Y P �� ,�," .;I�I ;.�"I ,—!, -,..-,1"��r # i j' t 11 " A} � }} s ..,i +. - , ", - rr i ,. � � I --%- ,v� �„ ,,..� '' t •yRit � i i i; +t, ry - 2 1 G $ �.;I, I� i J4, Y'k Z1 r r , i- y �. y+. ,t;,,f '�L. �r ' i � I t +e t s F '� ,-_�--'�� - TY NDI 'TES- DECREASE _ . _ ...._ — :''"fin ..�,...- --``'� , rf � '0 o� . EII .i SH TIn�t0 PP,(�I3Ai�.IL1 I c rr �+ - �'y'- - �' -- -- - ;> 1.; 2 r. , •'! r �:- - 1 "f i-7` - �; fir,_...-_ —_.., .t- �. * _ - ,. „ 5' y f`'�K.`+l 11 .I II 77�-1.. I I/ S„ / y -F- i0, wtf�t3csA ILi'i' w'•.Itw ,, , 1't 7� � i� � / , � l . �;.�..-� 1 �.. , C�,��,'1.,''I.. ��*-I,-,!--..7�-"!,,, -.,-I.:.,.-"";_,r,�?",�l,.--"`,,. A. .-;._,..,11".. .-�,:- �.,-,.2 �.� ',,.�-;,,. t_..�,--....�;`iW.!!i �".,��W,,!*- -.�. .- .,.T,...-,,.� .. 'AVfh,7 ;the k• 4A fiu" ' „ ; .. .. _ / *� ' f -� �i�r ` �/ C//�-/ O `// I I I /- ,. . . . ..� A4; fir' .�'�. ;5_r � ./!1''.._`.I� ��:,.411I ,.�.,(I�,--. w /� 1, �+' �' I +1 ��L-(s!sri o.t !'� .�� ��-,T. -�ll,I. .:`!" ,�.�! II' li vc�•E !.', �R c II. ..� p f.\ T ©,.' _ �5 r •r,.�'�..,��. 1 38UZ t I I t i :S• ; SriG_i. '*.1`.I�l1 . -"I4.1-FI ,E. rf A # t ` ��'_ �mt 'I�,� tCu'1 'i4,� a `,t,ip c43w'i3,r: ',,,t r' _ ' J - t \� -� I ` 1..... �•. ,} F '�_,�y}'s;:S'a }.:-Yi-Y-Y,#,4-' tl�, «sj�a' �/'( 'tr,:4( ,k �'n [��I]y .j■■yy.■�� {�(,y�'. 1■■,r■; / - /' / l .-I-w - al�1iI'\I lliI-\..",,,mt. ,m--I _ =II_, ,. I/ )- ff1t0.I I -I 1i � _ ,. ;) n.-_=., . II I-\ ,� �..=I A .= I. .. - l�-_=.'!:-. -. --I-�2"-'� �-*-w6-."4.,� -=� I"I ,I .: . ,=�-,I-=-. . I )I F-�A_-_-! . - _1 --. . �__.. --, l.-l'f.) ? .-..(N.,, I-,,I�. . P. �jI.. .T tt�I.-� I -� , 2,.-, I � . I - I .1 /, W. -� -\ II -f,f,lil�o,-N4llI /�r / � r I `� V' t `ri' (/` V r/ ■■•� �+•... E { \ I` ,ttiy 1�";... 11.��,o-I .,t-..T--I ,� �!�,��"i,1�..',.i,�,��1 ,-. , ""'.,.,'1��I .j-..".J . ��.; "*.� �,, �.;,.i.'��"- .;.,�.;,I. F�,,.7-., ,g-,1. �.� C k tr57"}y a r .:�iMA r l' r t' tJ / Q 1 / ��� O \�� I � �1 �1 : � ,_!� � `Y. >ilf", ,,,r`- s {.� M �' � ,.11 � � :'r.. �$Stt ,{[yj rygyr,�t �' '/,�. ,�' C ' � � \\ .�-' �''�, � a _ 1 � r - t iq I f��} �1`ti, .a, 7.h7r'4W�Yi' 1 .. V.� M E r� L U E V // ' - ` ' - fi� l : r II{ t ' r1 L4' T;jX o;l-. k ` r _ �Am~ ! �A I I �/ 1 , " ' �d�,JC'�'O0�? :I t I, ',',}Tr S. ! Y i-, ", .. I 1 \ IV ��-/ /- !y r a ,tit 1� y; FJ' / S I _ , J d © 'k11 p c I At11/ ti' Y,. , t , ' 'J J 1 ^ / r � I i e , , 'fit h t FIe1'er®,iic 6-. Figure 5, Landslide Hazard Map, _ /� �,.. 11 . I I \ � ;\ � '� -•., � ` 1 r, S . ,Z, r1x73r • / k. �iy ,; k froM-Fin�ii �epor�; Landslide Hazards. � qa � � � ± �. - t11� °'`r' . J r! r i Irnfeslgla Meadowdae Area, Edmonds, 1�1 ; _ F ,` 1: � tlVa6tiittgtor by R6gor Lowe Associates, Inc., ' N y a �,, 4,.� ,1 If {'.1 , t Oetoti r i�,' i � :' / r 0 2 0 4I. \�� •� ; a ItY a 1 , - gilt D 10 0 1 � �- 1 / `t --J W l,'` J 4 ,e �'r j: A •` 4A _ ✓ .•v, A if, did,. Nrb1 4 I II n // 14 / / I I 7�,p, \' ' 1 i �t,:1'i li ``yt,Y'' y I 100 200 300 400 500 / �. 'i ��I P 1 / r ,,.,¢ Ir;, ,F,. p, fi'•t, r, . rh / !� ` h to .,� ?J � fi 'i l SCALP IN FEET �/ L,� : ��,✓ II �\� � � I t� , 'I r" { Y,,/ ?, ) I ` f �. Contour Interval 5 t,, ' Y ,I ,) Aq r`' "1 3B02 I i i ` /.' ; n 3 'y�"'fir.. , i / r /1 J, /I �� -#f- t J 1 �� y r f/ �! ;' r�, r` r ) `' Y., - / / // 1 \ .11 ' I \ i- 1 .`n \ ` t : fit' a . .1101I 1i/ -;.�kr'i tl �Ci 1I1- / l- ", t f 1 � s�G., ; + "el - I jj 1 it1 \ � T 1 I 11 _ I - - I,�,,L: �'f , r t;�"\ �,'yY . I l) r ( / - 1 ( I I ` 1 / / - - >-1, a ..§� \- 0 II .PP-..' f f' Ir r J '�/I ,/� kv�-rI/ r IFJ ' It 1l I _ ._ - __t hA jl I~. 1 _ .. / •M �' ' / / 1,I I r�_ `\, r� I I11 /r -,-"I,- \ //, i __ i, 7 rt,� }1ajttrr.J;' t ` ''� r I-.fi __ \ P �+.v.. �'.�): �T, 1 1 t ,.F /� � '-_ 1- � 'ns " �r? 't . ` . . J J� Il I f �r eK t '. / 1' ( 1 I .. fi I h - "" / I �l I 1 1 I! f I I 1 fxti, {gyp , I --.1• �.. , , J V." . _• _ - -y .... J I 1 , - I // - F! i t7• .. ' , I ( _ '/ -- 1� 1 0 1 I I ` t 1 1 x :ti. Y7 J' i{/ ''f✓ ~ o f J + \ 1 / ` \ \ \ . - ./ u ) i ''p Y r �b i ♦ W r~! / 1 _ i , 1 1"f 1 1' 4 \ .. �� v f N a 's� � t t } l ?"I;fSJb1�r.:1t 4.S t. , r /. �._\ 1 y ' I r _ > 1. V�gt 1. .13i \ \\ ( / `.• �t r, Via, /x, _} t iq. / .-__ _— -.�, `". \. 1 / I�,� , �]`j� ?' +t'-i '•!NI' ;K Vie' tr7:. fir'. '1 +' •, lM r' �[,� / / _ '_ I� I / - L .13 11, ..)1.:":�II,; 11,.$. I :3��'-,%��.�t.1��!�_;1!p).,..I-,111111 _'....�.V .- ,f51I , ,, - y 'i / , ' r- - _� • . I I ` -M F1 tr' J /- I i 1 , , J . ', 1 ,. fit, : I ' 1 }, , iu x / / ' ' 1 t ,' .t f :{I'Y .., t.;-„ LJ. ..-,i / (\ �� , _ �Ari /1 I '� r'Yr' r t ,. rs,r 4,13,,1.' zt'it fil., (r r : F . V., - O VI I i / _J�' I.,\l . ; - " _ .(�'` , .:>'I�r , , ..,4',.A,�%- ..�:,�'..o��;, ,.,:_;"��.; L,'F�,I-i�.l,�,,!,.1,7:Ii". ,,, ,1,��-;':�-.').,-" :1,: ,�..,,�i!��4..e1 ..-i,�.-;.:'.�,,1�_,,.�l;�i.'��'!1� w,'!1d."1,.-�,.'4.-,1,".-f.:-��f��,�.�' ,'V. ,1 '.', -�:I1, x; , r:. `, r ,I , - u," , ,) f'� j �.% I I 1 I I f 1 , , I -.� /rf ke ,r 4 .. q .d ', ` f �'tr. i ,,� V 1 I ' / it ) T � ' ! �r .'. Y . y a�"ris x,. {4 W .�'t r 1�,�. Y fi Z .t. M, B I I I - kr S.. ♦ "TT - I 1 , t' �' ' . .' '} • ..•r ;1,"a'h ^'ij ',/ �}:l�f'./., �.' r, ` . , f 1 , ; ' iJ t y' }4 r y` 'h s• . F�� a1, LAND LIME —HAZARD AID FIGURE 1. t .^yRPrO lvl, „�l 4r 1 i Ir1 eer3 lhcC . r ,LPL{.' . ,_ �r t rNarrkv>.. ` 1 ', • ` I ' 1 '• tr ••I'' , ._s.-yir..5'' t r' v'' r[, ,:. ,'.y, fv < ter' q, t tr. h: 1 r ,) k o Y -h, e. 5. , ,. e .. )s r '.7 • i .( r } y:'fi F p c. .I, c- 6+ r• d 7 a 1; ? + i f �. : r 'A• r r <• i' , yr A `C f Y •k. J l x 1' S a}. *'. •t h h t. ii:> J t' . F '- C .., , t ' KN I l F 'Y �. �• !6i , ,r 1 1 ,� t•. I• �/ c J r. ,, 3' t, i' d 1 1 , , , r . i -' '. .... le-�, � ,. , ,., ... ,. :. ,. ., .: ,' I .f S, ':,r ,i.... ,:'' .: .,, ri �r �,.,•:,r.• nt..,. 1• > .k Y �. . I ... r, :, , " r i x r . ex. 1 y rI ,r1'I '� k�'. t. k , t .h. r `r F . } t e } Y. 1'.� . < N /� `�g> +T: b , � 2 t s. ��} i;: r. .. r... k .t. , , , r 1& V .x Y ,..it 1,� F�, .S ti ry i. �7. ,.k #'r/ ,. �.+r.'�, {„ t � a, t l :.t .r , r r,t 1 r vy, +5 . ;•-, ^� -.1 �Y .."G 4- . r •1 !1 .. I M' fig_ 'ri�.y � , ., .�%Jf�R�Ir.4,tt �..,t,s,�..r`�.'1s�{ .r4..n,.. . 4.. ..7i,a 1- .- „ x [.. , _..,.s •. rh',•. ,,.. .. �.-�.��,•. t. ,.-�...,.F.,�r. . •.....rrn: h'P,.4�+.•'.'..._ .�i... r.r t..:. .... �: >-:, .. ,,4� - :. ,. .rt„ .. _. _,_ ... .�A,�,'.rd:',J r e..a .,.�i'=;�5 ... :..t,.. ..,•.:.�A�4�k',�.,w.t.-,., o-J%�n�-:;,:%.n•...,�,7ab-s.t�%�'!di>�3`Ii�-U.r'v�', w}5��T4�S=', .i�'H,,