Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16111 76TH PL W (5)
IIII��III /(P/l/ 7loM AJr, c.,� Page 1 of 1 Smith, Mike From: Mcintosh, Brian Sent: Tuesday,, June 23, 2009 4:42 PM To: Hawkins, Jaime; Smith, Mike; English, Robert; Mcintosh, Brian; 'David.Agee@bnsf.com'; 'khunter@utc.wa.gov'; McConnell, Jeanie; 'Boston, Bob (UTC)'; 'phil.r@inksolutions.com'; 'roger.jacobsen@bnsf.com'; 'milollc@yahoo.com'; 'Nelson, Alan R'; Lindsay, Rich; 'Moore, Chuck A'; 'Omsberg, Donald R' Subject: Meadowdale Crossing Fence Project This memo is information for all who participated in the on -site visit last fall and who have become involved in this project since that time. As of yesterday BNSF approved an agreement to move forward with this fence project ( location map attached). Crews will begin work tomorrow (June 24) clearing vegetation to allow the fence and rolling gate installation crew clear access early next week. It is scheduled for completion June 30. We will be working with BNSF regarding gate locks so that City and BNSF maintenance, Mr. Milosavljevic, public safety, and perhaps others whom I have not identified, have access to the fence and marina. The fence and gate will be the responsibility of the City to maintain. Thanks - Brian. 6/24/09 TRACKING NO. PL 1318 EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND CITY OF EDMONDS SCALE: 1 IN.= 10o FT. NORTHWEST DIV. SCENIC SUBDIV. L.S. 0050 DATE 5 /12/2009 REV. 5/13/2009 No 0,m,,:tw' do p ow a a ,r �w DESCRIPTION: 1 PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 9.106 SQ. FT. (0.2 AC.) MORE OR LESS SHOWN SHADED. SECTION: 5 TOWNSHIP: 27N RANGE: 4 E— P.M: WILL. y`- ," jw O N COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH MEADOWDALE WASHINGTON SMC DRAWING NO. 1- 46494R1 ' �" .. FIRE -PREVENTION Serving Brier, Edmonds, and 12425 Meridian Ave. S INSPECTION REPORT SNOHOMISH-GO. ' ' ' ❑ EDMONDS FIRE Mountlake Terrace Everett, WA 98208 ❑ BRIER Phone (425) 551-1200 ❑ AKE TERRACE DISTR.Twww.FireDistrict]. UNINCOMOUNT [1 UNINCORPORATED org .Fax (4 25) 551-1272 FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT LOCATION: 16111 76 th Place W' OW26 Atinual IS-C BUSINESS NAME: Vaf anL PHONE: 42,674322.11 SCHEDULED Nw 2f)1.4 ► DATE DUE MAILING UFIR ► 1898 ADDRESS: 16111 7bLh Plazc W . Edrmnds, WA 03026 BUSINESS OWNER: EvAts', Jw.k HOME PHONE: a EMERGENCY-1: HOME PHONE: CURRENT KEY ACCESS-2: HOME PHONE: CITY YES NO BUSINESS EMAIL: LICENSE PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE NAME OF INSPECTOR: 4k ji, �Z_1 FIRE SYS IEME: AS 9102 FE__, HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 3 3 / 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 I AGREE TO CORRECT THE ABOVE VIOLATION(S) IN THE NEXT 30 DAYS X 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTEDTO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 5 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 1 +3 7 '3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 18 4 18 DATE: DISPOSITION: LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO LETTER NEEDED ❑ YES ❑ NO g FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY 16111 -7 G 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS RE: Meadowdale Marina, LLC Administrative Appeal APL2011-0001 APPEAL OF NONCONFORMING USE INTERPRETATION Summary The appeal is sustained and the Appellants meet the criteria for reconstructing their damaged building under ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) The Appellant appeals an interpretation by the Edmonds Building Official of a nonconforming use provision that requires the demo litiordremoval of a wooden building located on the Meadowdale Marina. The building was completely destroyed by a January, 2011 storm. The specific nonconforming use provisions at issue are ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). Both provisions provide that the repair of a nonconforming structure is authorized so long as the damage is less than 75% of the replacement cost. In a formal interpretation, the Building Official impliedly determined that "structure" only encompasses the wooden building and not the entire marina facility. Under the Building Official's interpretation, since the wooden building was completely destroyed, its damage exceeds 75% of its replacement value and it cannot be repaired or replaced. The building official's February 22, 2011 interpretation requires a marina facility designed to accommodate two buildings to permanently accommodate only one. This would constitute a significant loss of development potential with no corresponding public benefit. "Structure" as used in the nonconforming use provisions should include all of the component parts of the Meadowdale Marina, including the wooden building. Under this interpretation of structure, replacement of the wooden building would only cost 18% of the replacement value of the entire marina complex. This is well below the 75% threshold of ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). Testimony [This sunrman) of testirnoni) is not to be construed as any finding made by the Examiner. It is merely a summary of what was said so that the reader naay understand what was presented.] Michael Mann, attorney, presented the Appellant's appeal. He acknowledged that the wooden building on the pier structure was extensively damaged but this does not represent a significant portion of the pier facility as a whole. The Appellants agree that they applied for a shoreline permit in APPEAL - 1 I / � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2005 to repair the pier facility. The permit was approved in 2008 for reconstructing the entire marina facility. Condition 2 of the decision states that if overwater structures exceed the damage threshold they cannot be replaced. Mr. Mann emphasized this pertains to the entire marina facility, not just the wooden structure. He noted that the wooden structure collapsed in 2010 winter storm. The larger metal building was not damaged. The original Meadowdale application describes in detail what the facility is, which includes all structures associated with the marina facility, not just the wooden building. The City's staff report recognizes that the permit application was for the entire marina. In assessing the threshold for repair, the replacement value of the entire structure must be considered. Replacement cost at the time of construction is 8.2 million dollars. The replacement value for the wooden building is 1.4 million dollars. Mr. Mann reasoned that just looking at the wooden building in assessing repair thresholds is erroneous for three different reasons. First, the 2005 application was for the marina as a whole. Second, the 2005 decision contemplated that if the "structures" were damaged more than 75% the repair threshold would be exceeded. Finally, treating the wooden building in isolation ignores the fact that the building is functionally a part of the marina. Mr. Mann noted that there is a case on point, Preserve Our Islancls v. King County, where the court determined that for a repair of a dock the value of the entire marina facility had to be considered, which included 100 acres of associated facilities. Mr. Mann also noted that the staff is incorrect in arguing that the building has moved. The building wasn't moved by the Appellant. It was moved by a stone. If it is argued that anytime a building collapses it "moves", the repair allowances of the nonconforming use provisions would be rendered a nullity. Page 2 of the City staff report recognizes that in rebuilding the building may be moved back to its original location, recognizing that a structure can be moved when it is damaged. David Drebin, real estate appraiser, testified on behalf of the Appellant. He is a state certified appraiser. He has appraised numerous commercial marine waterfront facilities, including the Preserve Our Islands facility as well as a NOA facility and piers 62 and 63 in Seattle and piers in Anacortes. Commercial marinas, especially saltwater marinas, are very expensive, largely due to shoreline regulations. Mr. Drebin's appraisal report was admitted as Exhibit 13. Mr. Drebin inspected the marina as best he could. There was a fence denying access. He used Assessor data for the facility. He also viewed a prior appraisal and similar sales in the vicinity. He used a cost approach appraisal, which is the preferred method for special purpose sales. He noted that he had to consider that a significant portion of the land is submerged and in fact leased from DNR. Taking all these factors into consideration he formulated a depreciated cost analysis. He came up with a replacement cost less depreciation, which was $8,645,000 as shown in the first page of the appraisal and the last page of the appraisal. The appraisal separates land from improvements. He also detennined a replacement cost immediately prior to the storm, which was $2,887,000. The depreciated value after the storm was $2,537,500, the difference being the loss of the depreciated wooden building. The replacement cost at the time of destruction is $8,645,000. The repair cost for the damaged portion after the storm is $350,000, the depreciated value of $350,000. If you replaced it APPEAL - 2 r 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 witli a new building, the new building would be $1,400,000. The value of the wood building the day before the storm divided by the value of the whole property before the storm is 12.1%. The "as is" value of the entire depreciated facility after the storm divided by the replacement cost new is 29.35%. Mr. Drebin testified that under the Preserve Our Islands case the value of the entire facility was required to be considered and he sees no reason why the same would not apply to the subject project. Use of Assessor information as done by the City is not accurate. The replacement value in the 2009 appraisal report used by the City is based upon considerations that are clearly not accurate. The 2009 report described the wooden building as a barn structure with a dirt floor. The wooden building actually had a finished floor with a restaurant and was over water and construction over water is orders of magnitude more expensive then land. That's why he used a per square foot cost based upon the value of overwater structures. In cross examination, Mr. Drebin stated he attempted to inspect the property on May 4, 2011. He did not access the site. He viewed the property from the bank on the opposite side of adjoining railroad tracks. He made no inspection by watercraft. No one affiliated with the property owner has been able to access the property since the storm, because there are holes on the dock. Mr. Drebin has several photographs of the interior of the wooden building before it was destroyed. The photos were probably taken shortly after the current owner purchased the property, but Mr. Drebin is not sure when. Mr. Drebin acquired his information on the condition of the building within a year before the stone from "Milo". Milo noted that the wooden structure had wooden floors as corroborated by the photographs. Milo believed that the building was reparable. The wooden building after the storm is a jumble of sticks. He hasn't seen whether some of the restaurant fixtures are repairable or even present, either before or after the storm. Mr. Drebin detennined that the value of the entire marina had to be used in applying the City's nonconforming use provisions because that's consistent with the Preserve Our Islands case, which is "on all fours" with this case. Mr. Drebin agrees with the City that the wood frame building has zero value after the storm, but he disagrees strongly that is the proper measure for assessing repair limits for nonconforming strictures. The wooden building could not be sold separately. The day before the storm the wooden building had a depreciated value of $350,000. The replacement cost before the storm is 1.4 million dollars for the wooden building. He doesn't know what the repair cost would be for the wooden building. To repair the building today it would cost 1.4 million dollars. The pier has zero value today. The metal building still retains 50% of its value if you had to replace it today. The metal building is located on concrete supports and the two figures in the last page of the appraisal report are for the building and the concrete supports. The top line is for the building. The 350,000 value in column two is based solely upon depreciation and the fact the building has been destroyed is accounted for at the bottom of the column where the entire $350,000 amount has been deducted. The 12.1% and 48.49% on the last page are based upon the value of the entire marina before the storm. The difference between the two percentages is that in one you're using 1.4 million in the numerator and the other you're using the $350,000 figure. The pier has zero value before and after the storm. The depreciation for the wooden building was not based upon any information acquired within a year of destruction or a site visit. No inspection was done by watercraft because watercraft use was not offered for the appraisal. APPEAL - 3 � � 1 I In redirect, Mr. Drebin testified that if the building was valued at zero both before and after the storm, the repair would still be well within the 75% repair maximum. The City code does not define repair 2 or replacement costs. The appraisal report employs three different methodologies for assessing the 3 75% requirement. The first two pages use cost value new verses depreciated value after the storm, which comes to 70.65%. The other two methodologies are identified in the last page of the report. 4 The primary difference from the City's calculations is that he is using the entire value of the marina. 5 Roger Hertrich, citizen, testified that he has been to both buildings of the marina over the years. 6 Towards the later years there were some holes but you could still use both buildings. He made purchases from the concrete building and it was considered as one with the wooden building. He 7 considers it a historic structure. It's reminiscent of structures that existed when salmon fishing was top notch in the Sound. In the original shoreline hearings the neighbors were asserting envirorunental 8 problems. Each of the councilmembers had some association with the neighbors who opposed the 9 project. The hearing in front of the Council was very political and neighborhood opposition was based upon the desire to stop the train whistles necessitated by the crossing of the project access. The 10 neighborhood opposition is what led to the destruction of the facility because it couldn't be repaired on time. The wooden building was only a partial part of the marina facility. He considered the 11 wooden and concrete building to be one facility because they were so close together and you would visit both. 12 13 Alvin Rutledge, citizen, testified that the building has been there a long time. There's a neighborhood park in the corner. He would like to know if the repair policy has been enforced before. He also 14 noted that the former City representative had taken a different position on the repair policy and that lie should be consulted on this matter. 15 16 Jeff Taraday, Edmonds City Attorney, noted that there is no debate on whether the wood building is 17 completely destroyed. He noted that the 2006 permit decision, p. 8, Conclusion b(1) states that "if either" building is damaged or destroyed to the point it exceeds repair maximums the buildings may 18 not be reconstructed. The focus is on individual buildings not the entire marina facility. The property owners rely entirely on the remaining value of the metal structure and concrete pier. The wooden pier 19 had no value before or after the storm. All that's left is the metal building and concrete pier. The 20 shoreline permit did not cover the metal building and concrete pier. The first page of the Examiner's decision states that the permit was for the replacement of the wooden portions of the facility. The 21 Examiner inquired whether the appeal was rnoot because the permit had lapsed and Mr. Taraday responded that whether or not the permit had lapsed was not germane to the appeal. Mr. Taraday 22 showed some Google earth maps to show that the facility has been subject to constant decay. The 23 maps show that in 2005 the wooden pier probably had some value but more recent photos show that they no longer have that value, including a year before the storm. 24 25 Exhibits 26 APPEAL-4 0- I The May 12, 2011 staff report along with its attachments were admitted into the record during the hearing. Attachments 1-12 to the staff report were admitted as corresponding Exhibits 1-12. 2 A summary appraisal report dated May 16, 2011 and prepared by David Drebin was admitted as 3 Exhibit 13. Written comments dated May 19, 2011 from David Mann were admitted as Exhibit 14. 4 5 Findings of Fact 6 Procedural: 7 1. Appellant. The Appellants is Meadowdale Marina, LLC. 8 2. Hearing. The Examiner held a hearing on the application at 1:00 pm on May 19, 2011, in the 9 City of Edmonds City Council Chambers. 10 Substantive: 11 3. Description of Appeal. The Appellant appeals a formal interpretation issued by the Edmonds 12 Building Official dated February 22, 2011 and admitted as Exhibit 4. The Building Official concludes that a wooden nonconforming building destroyed by a storm on January 16, 2011 and U located on the Meadowdale Marina may not be replaced. ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 14 23.10.220(D) provide that the repair of a nonconforming structure is authorized so long as the damage is less than 75% of the replacement cost. In Exhibit 4 the Building Official determined 15 that the value of the wooden building prior to destruction was $67,000 and its replacement cost was $573,000. Since the replacement cost far exceeded the value of the building, the Building 16 Official determined that it exceeded the 75% threshold imposed by ECDC 17.40.020(F) and could 17 not be replaced. 18 4. Background. The Meadowdale Marina is located at 16111 76th Pl. W. The marina is composed of a pier structure, approximately two-thirds of which is an old timber structure. The 19 remaining pier is newer and composed of concrete and steel. Both strictures are structurally tied 20 together. On the pier are two buildings. One building is a metal warehouse that was used to store boats. An older wooden building abuts the metal building. The wooden building is the structure 21 that was destroyed by the January 16, 2011 storm. It was historically used to support recreational fishing. The wooden building abuts the metal building, but does not share any walls and is not 22 connected to it by any interior doors. 2' In 2005 the Appellant applied for a shoreline substantial development permit to replace the 24 wooden portions of the marina with a concrete and steel structure. This would make the entire pier of similar construction and likely prolong its life significantly. At the time of application, both the 25 wooden and metal buildings were nonconforming (and still are) because the City's shoreline master program prohibits buildings to be placed waterward of the ordinary high water mark in the 26 CW zone. APPEAL - 5 f i i 1 At Page 8 of his decision on the shoreline substantial development permit, the Hearing Examiner 2 concluded as follows: 3 Because both of the buildings located on the Bier- are nonconforming, the 4 buildings may be maintained and even repaired and remodeled, but the footprint or volume of the buildings rnav not be expanded in and, way. Furthermore, if 5 either of these buildings is damaged or destroyed to the Boint that it meets the 6 thresholds identified in either ECDC 17.40.020 or ECDC 23.10?20, the building may not be reconstructed. 7 It does not appear that any work has been done on the marina since the Examiner's 2005 decision. 8 The condition of the wooden pier has deteriorated significantly since the Examiner's decision and 9 the wooden building was completely destroyed by a storm on January 11, 2011. 10 5. Valuation. As discussed in the conclusions of law, the value of the wooden building and the replacement cost of the marina facility are germane to the application of ECDC 17.40.020 in 11 determining whether the Appellant may replace the wooden building. The values formulated by the Appellant and City differ, but using either sets of figure yield the same result, i.e. the wooden 12 building can be replaced under the interpretation adopted in this decision. Nonetheless the correct I3 figures should still be used for ECDC 17.40.020. 14 There are two values necessary to apply ECDC 17.40.020 and ECDC 23.10.220(D). The first is the replacement cost of the wooden building. The staff report notes that a 2009 appraisal concludes that 15 replacement cost is $132,000 and that the replacement cost using international building code 16 formulas is $573,440. The Appellant's appraiser submitted a report setting the replacement cost at $1.4 million dollars. The Examiner finds that the appraisals are the more accurate valuations 17 because they are based upon more project specific review than the generic tables of the building codes. The two appraisals (Ex. 8 and Ex. 13) have differing strengths and weaknesses. The 2009 18 appraisal was based upon site inspections while the 2011 appraisal was not due to the dilapidated 19 and dangerous condition of the structure. The Examiner does not find this to be a critical short coming because Mr. Drebin was able to get details on the condition of the building prior to the 20 January 2001 storm from its owner. A more critical and determinative shortcoming is that the 2009 appraisal is based on the square foot value of a barn structure with a dirt floor. The actual building 21 had a finished floor and was used for a restaurant. More importantly, the 2009 appraisal did not factor in the added value of the building being an overwater structure. Mr. Drebin testified the overwater feature significantly adds to value due the difficulties and costs in acquiring permits. For 23 these reasons, the value of the wooden building is determined to be 1.4 million dollars. 24 The only valuation on the replacement cost of the marina facility as a whole was prepared by Mr. Drebin and calculated to be 7.7 million dollars. The expertise and Mr. Drebin and his methodology 25 more than adequately support this determination and it is found to be a verity for purposes of this 26 appeal. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Conclusions of Law Procedural: 1. Authority of Hearing Examiner. As shall be further discussed, the subject of the appeal is the building official's determination of replacement and repair costs under both ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). ECDC 17.40.020(F) expressly provides that the building official's determination is appealable as a Type II staff decision. There is no similar express classification for determinations made pursuant to ECDC 23.10.030, but ECDC 20.01.003(A) classifies formal interpretations as Class II decisions. This would include the ECDC 23.10.030 interpretations made by the building official' that are the subject of this appeal. The Building Official's determinations under both nonconforming use provisions in Ex. 4 will be referred to as a formal interpretation in this decision since that classification is correct for both. ECDC 20.01.003(B) provides that Type II decisions are appealable to the Hearing Examiner, who is tasked with conducting an open record appeal hearing and making a final decision that is appealable to court. 2. Applicable Nonconforming Use Standards. As discussed in the findings of fact, the Appellant may not replace its wooden building unless authorized by the City's nonconforming use provisions. There are two similar provisions that apply — ECDC 17.40.020(F) (applicable to all development in the City) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) (part of the City's shoreline master program and only applicable to developments along the shoreline). 23.10.030(A) and (C) provide that all developments within the shoreline area must comply with both the shoreline master program regulations (in this case ECDC 23.10.220(D)) as well as those that have more general applicability (in this case ECDC ) ECDC 17.40.020(F). Consequently, the wooden building must qualify for repair/reconstruction under both ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). ECDC 17.40.020(F) provides in relevant part as follows: F. Restoration. If a nonconforming building or structure is destroyed or is damaged in an amount equal to 75 percent or more of its replacement cost at the time of destruction, said building shall not be reconstructed except in fill conformance with the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code... ECDC 23.10.220(D) provides in relevant part as follows: ' ECDC 20.01.003(A) provides that the "director's" interpretation is a Class II permit, but ECDC 20.01.001(A) clarifies that the interpretation can be made by the director's designee. APPEAL - 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 D. If a nonconforming development is damaged to an extent not exceeding 75 percent replacement cost of the original structure, it may be reconstructed to those configurations existing immediately prior to the time the structure was damaged... 3. Ke. Issue. The key issue of this appeal is what constitutes the "replacement cost" in both ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10220(D). The Appellant asserts that the "replacement cost" is the replacement cost of the entire marina, including its land. The City asserts that the "replacement cost" is only the replacement cost of the wooden building. If the Appellant is correct in its interpretation, it can replace the wooden building even if it relies upon the City's valuations. Similarly, if the City is correct in its interpretation the Appellant is prohibited from replacing the building, even if it uses Mr. Drebin's valuations. 4. Preserve Our Islands. At hearing Mr. Mann argued that Preserve Our Islands v. King County, SHB No's 04-009 and 04-010 (2004), conclusively establish that "replacement cost" means replacement of the entire marina facility and its associated land. These cases indirectly support the arguments made by Mr. Mann and Mr. Drebin, but are not as on point as asserted. The cases are persuasive on the point that replacement value should be based upon replacement of the entire structure, but are not persuasive on including the underlying land in that valuation. Preserve Our Islands concerned an appeal of a denial of a shoreline substantial development permit to replace an existing but non-functional conveyor and barge loading dock used to export sand and gravel on Maury Island in King County. The barge loading dock and conveyor was part of a 235 acre site used to mine and export sand and gravel. The dock was used to export sand and gravel from 1968 through 1978. The barge dock deteriorated significantly over the years and could no longer be used by the time the owners of the facility applied for a shoreline substantial development permit in 1997 to repair and restore the dock and conveyor system. The dock and conveyor belt were nonconforming uses, so the owners had to establish that the repair/restoration they proposed was authorized by King County nonconforming use provisions, in particular KCC 25.32.050(B), which provides in pertinent part a follows: A use or development, not conforming to existing regulations, which is destroyed, deteriorated, or damaged by more than 50% of its fair market value at present or at the time of its destruction, by fire, explosion or other casualty or act of God, may be reconstructed only so far as it is consistent with existing regulations. Similar to this case, a major issue in the construction of KCC 25.32.050(B) was whether the " 50% of its fair market value" referred to the dock/conveyor belt or encompassed more of the gravel operations. King County argued that the fair market value only applied to the dock and conveyor belt. Mr. Drebin, as a witness in that case, argued that in order to have a viable gravel barge operation the dock and conveyor belt had to be attached to at least 50 acres of property. Therefore, z The two Preserve Our Islands cases were consolidated into a single decision. APPEAL-8 , w' 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 replacement value would be based upon replacement of the dock/conveyor and at least 50 acres of gravel extraction operations. Another appraiser used the replacement cost of the entire 235 acre of operation to evaluate the 50% requirement. The Shoreline Hearings Board agreed that the surrounding operations had to be applied to the 50% requirement, but didn't identify whether the analysis of Mr. Drebin or that of the other appraisal applied. Rather, the Board concluded that "under either of these costs to repair the wooden dock, the project complies with the 50% test and could be reconstructed as a nonconforming use." Although there are certainly, parallels between Preserve Our Islands and this case, a close inspection reveals some significant distinguishing features. First, the most compelling point to the Board was legislative history. The Board quoted a statement in a staff report that accompanied the adoption of KCC 25.32.050(B) that provided as follows: The 50% rule, as proposed, would apply to an entire `use or development, 'rather than to a building — thereby avoiding hardship to a use or development within which a single building is destroyed. The Board concluded that the legislative history above "is conclusive evidence that the proper measure of `fair market value at present' under KCC 25.32.050(B) is the value of the non- conforming use or structure in terms of value to the whole, or the amount its absence would detract from the value of the whole". Preserve Our Islands, Conclusion No. 41. The Board also noted that the legislative history is consistent with standard appraisal practices in evaluating "fair market value at present", quoting from The Appraisal of Real Estate that "'...the value of a component is measured in terms of its contribution to the value of the whole property or as the amount that its absence would detract from the whole."' Id. Unlike the Preserve Our Islands case, there is no legislative history in this administrative record that provides any light on the interpretation of the City's nonconforming use standards. There is no "conclusive evidence" on the proper measure for the City's 75% rule. Perhaps a more significant distinguishing feature is that the City's two nonconforming use provisions base the relevant valuation on the "replacement cost" of a structure or building whereas the operative term of KCC 25.32.050(B) is "fair market value at present" for a use or development. The King County ordinance is clearly directed at fair market valuation concepts of a use or development while the City's ordinances are focused upon the replacement value of structures. There is nothing in the record to suggest that appraisal principles applying to fair market valuation of entire uses or developments are directly applicable to evaluating the replacement cost of a structure. Mr. Drebin testified that the same methodology should be used, but when asked by Mr. Mann why, Mr. Drebin testified that the Preserve Our Islands case was "on all fours" with the case at hand. Mr. Drebin did not state that he based this conclusion on accept appraisal methodology or even applications in other nonconforming use projects. The record shows that Mr. Drebin's opinion was entirely based upon his reading of the KCC 25.32.050(B) case. No deference will be given to Mr. Drebin's legal analysis of a shoreline hearings board case. APPEAL - 9 I L; 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Ili point of fact, Mr. Drebin's legal conclusions are contradicted by the only direct appraisal evidence in the record on what constitutes replacement value. Mr. Drebin's appraisal states that he applied "replacement cost" as defined in the Dictionary of Real Estate of Appraisal, 3'*d edition. His appraisal report contains a page full of appraisal definitions. It inexplicably doesn't include the definition of "replacement cost", which would presumably be the centerpiece of his evaluation. Fortunately, the other appraisal in this record, the one done in 2009, Ex. 8, quotes only one definition and that happens to be the "replacement cost" definition cited by Mr. Drebin, as follows: the estimated cost to construct, at current prices, a building with utility equivalent to the building being appraised, using modern materials and current standards, design and layout. The Dictionary of Real Estate definition for replacement cost focuses exclusively on the costs of constructing a new building. It is the methodology most consistent with the focus of the City's nonconforming use provisions on structures and buildings. Preserve Our Islands does not compel a conclusion that the value of the land of the Meadowdale Marina must be factored into replacement cost. 5. Interpretation of "structure" in ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). Both ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) apply to a "structure". The structure in this case is the marina facility as a whole instead of just the wooden building. At the outset it should be recognized that both the wooden building and the entire marina facility itself both qualify as a "structure" under the City's zoning code definition of the term, which provides in relevant part as follows: Structure means a combination of materials constructed and erected permanently on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground..:. More information is necessary to determine which structure, the wooden building or marina facility as a whole, qualifies as a "stricture" for purposes of ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). In construing "structure", the most important inquiry is legislative intent. Unfortunately, unlike the Preserve Our Islands case, no legislative history is readily available to interpret the City's nonconforming use provisions. Despite this, the purpose and intent of the provisions are fairly self- evident. As suggested in the quoted legislative history of the King County provision, supra, the purpose of nonconforming use provisions is to reduce the hardship3 on the property owner. This 3 More than anything else, "hardship" in the context of the 75% provisions is the loss of investment backed expectations, i.e. the fact that the property owner can no longer realize a full return on their investment in a structure because a portion of the structure is damaged. This type of hardship is of the same type protected against in the interpretation of "structure" as applying to the whole when dealing with an integrated facility. For example, in this case the hardship would be that the Appellants cannot realize a full return on their marina investment because the wooden portion of the building could not accommodate a building for which it was designed. APPEAL - 10 :I if 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 focus on hardship is consistent with the judicially recognized purpose of nonconforming use provisions, which is to avoid potential constitutional due process challenges to zoning legislation arising from deprivations of property rights 4. McMillan v. King County, Wn. App. (2011, Division 1). The fundamental factor of any due process analysis is a balancing of hardship on the property owner verses public benefit. See, e.g., Presbvtery of Seattle v. King County, 114 Wn.2d 320, 331, 787 P.2d 907 (1990). However, weighed against protecting the property owner from hardship is the fact that it is the policy of zoning legislation to phase out nonconforming uses. This is because nonconforming uses are disfavored under the law. Id. at AlcAlillan. As the repair cost to a structure approaches 75% of its replacement cost, there is little to distinguish the hardship on a property owner with someone who is faced with developing a vacant lot'. Given those circumstances, there is no reason to provide the nonconforming structure owner more favorable treatment than a vacant lot owner who must comply with current zoning regulations. Since nonconforming uses are disfavored and the policy is to phase them out, the balance of equities dictate that at the 75% threshold the property owner must be subjected to the same zoning regulations as everyone else. Seen in this light it's clear that the value of the underlying land to a structure has nothing to do with this balance of equities. There may very well be a certain amount of land necessary to make a structure function efficiently, but when comparing the equities of making a structure owner comply with new zoning regulations after damage, the only relevant consideration is how close that structure owner is to the status of a vacant land owner. 4 To be abundantly clear, nothing in this decision should be construed as expressly or impliedly concluding that upholding the building official's 2/22/11 determination would violate the constitutional rights of the Appellant. The constitutional underpinnings of nonconforming use provisions serve as a guide for interpreting them as a matter of general applicability, in this case that "structure" should include what could be construed as collection of separate structures when they're functionally integrated. As applied, this interpretation may or may not be necessary to avoid .a constitutional violation. The degree of harm (burden on the owner) must be very high to qualify as a constitutional violation. Incorporating an assessment of degree of harm into the interpretation to make it more closely aligned with constitutional principles would make the provision unworkable, since assessments of constitutional violations are highly subjective and it is difficult to predict in many circumstances how a court would rule. 5 The converse is also correct. As the repair costs approaches zero, there is little to distinguish the property owner from someone with an existing nonconforming structure who is allowed to continue the use. The 75% threshold essentially serves as the dividing line between which class of property owners applies. 6 Indirectly, land can be construed as playing a factor when it serves as the link to buildings that are functionally dependent upon each other. Buildings separated by land would arguably not qualify as a single structure under the ECDC definition, but could nonetheless be highly dependent upon each other. For example, a power building can be critical to the functioning of an oil refinery spread out over dozens of acres. If the building was completely destroyed and the owner was not allowed to rebuild it, the owner would no longer have reasonable use of his property. Those situations can be addressed through the variance process, which is ideally suited for assessing the unique circumstances of a piece of property and its relationship to the hardships it places upon the owner. The inclusion of land value in the 75% requirement should be avoided, because the land value can significantly distort the comparison between a developed and vacant land owner. APPEAL - 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This balancing of equities does not so neatly pencil out when a portion of an integrated structure is singled out for the 75% threshold. Singling out a structure in this fashion can detract from the value and/or functionality of the entire structure. In this regard, a property owner is in a different position than a vacant land owner. Compliance with current zoning regulations will result in the added costs of disruption to other parts of the structure and/or a diminution of its overall value. The courts have already recognized this concept in the area of expansions of nonconforming uses in buildings. Nonconforming uses may expand to other parts of a building if those other parts were designed to accommodate the nonconforming use. See Bellingham v. Keller, 92 Wn.2d 726 (1979). The Preserve Our Islands case also supports the consideration of a structure within the context of a larger whole. As previously discussed, Preserve Our Islands doesn't dictate the consideration of land values in the 75% threshold analysis because this isn't consistent with the technical definition of "replacement cost" and the purpose and intent of the City's nonconforming use provisions. However, Preserve Our Islands also supports the more general concept that impacts on a development as a whole is a relevant balancing factor in the equities of nonconforming use provisions. A final factor dictating the consideration of the whole is the efficient use of land. Limiting the full development of an integrated structure displaces market demand for that development elsewhere. This adds to development costs. Further, in the case of shoreline development it can lead to an increase in environmental impacts by pushing demand from an area already developed to untouched shoreline. Given all the considerations above, the "structure" in this case is the entire Meadowdale Marina facility. The wooden building is physically integrated into the marina facility as a whole. As to functional integration, it is important to note that the wooden pier was not subject to the Building Official's 2/22/11 demolition order. Of course, it couldn't be because the wooden pier is necessary to access the metal building. Consequently, the Building Official's order would result in the allowance of only one building on a pier facility that was designed to accommodate two. This would be a very unfortunate result, given that it would deprive the market of a rare opportunity for overwater development with arguably minor environmental shoreline impacts. Applying the 75% threshold to the wooden building only would be unfair to the property owner and a waste of development potential with no corresponding public benefit. The term "structure" in the nonconforming use provision applies to the marina facility as a whole. 6. Application of ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) to Meadowdale Marina. As found in Finding of Fact No. 5, the repair cost of the wooden building is 1.4 million dollars and the replacement cost of the entire marina facility is 7.7 million dollars. Replacement "new", as There would be a minor aesthetic impact, although the visual encroachment would not be that significant given the existence of the current structure. Railroad track crossings may also increase, which in turn could potentially disrupt enjoyment of the shoreline with more train whistles and/or crossing improvements. It doesn't appear likely that the difference between one and two buildings would make any difference in this regard. APPEAL - 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 opposed to depreciated value, is used for the replacement cost term in the nonconforming use provisions in line with the Dictionary of Real Estate definition for replacement cost previously quoted. Replacement new is also used for quantifying the damage to the structure under the nonconforming use provisions. Replacement new serves as the best value to compare hardship verses development by a vacant lot owner as discussed in Conclusion of Law No. 5, since the vacant lot owner too would have to build a new stricture. The repair costs the wooden building are only 18% of the replacement costs of the marina facility, well below the 75% threshold of ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D)$. 7. Application of Hearing Examiner Decision to Interpretation. At hearing the City argued that the Hearing Examiner's 2005 decision, Ex. 6, required that the 75% threshold would apply to individual buildings as opposed to the entire marina facility, i.e. the interpretation advocated by City staff in this proceeding. The City bases its argument on Page 8 of the decision, which references specific buildings as follows: Furthermore, if either of these buildings[the metal and wooden buildings] is damaged or destroyed to the point that it meets the thresholds identified in either ECDC 17.40.020 or ECDC 23.10.220, the building may not be reconstructed. It will be presumed that the Hearing Examiner intended to write his decision in a manner that is consistent with applicable regulations at the time. The City Attorney is correct in his hearing comments that the Examiner did not need to mention individual buildings in the statement above if the Examiner understood ECDC 17.40.020 and ECDC 23.10.220 to apply to the marina as a whole. Equally clear, though, is that the Examiner's reference to ECDC 17.40.020 and ECDC 23.10.220 means that he wanted those ordinances followed. The Examiner made no express interpretation of ECDC 17.40.020 and ECDC 23.10.220. He just required compliance with those regulations. Compliance in this case means that the wooden building can be reconstructed. 8. Movement of Building. The Appellant asserts that the City has taken the position that since the debris of the wooden building has moved from the building site (by act of the stone) that the building cannot be replaced. It does not appear that staff took that position. References were made to Hearing Examiner provisions prohibiting the movement of the building in the staff report, but the staff report does not conclude that since the building was moved by the storm it can't be replaced. The staff report and arguments made at the hearing were all focused on the degree of destruction of the building. At any rate, any movement created by the storm would not constitute movement as contemplated in the Examiner decision. The building was not moved, it was leveled. Only pieces of the building were moved as they were ripped by wind and perhaps wave from its structure and s Both the staff and Appellant have focused their attention exclusively on the repair costs of the wooden building. The wooden pier needs to be repaired as well. If the structure is to be viewed as a whole, technically repair costs for the wooden pier should be added to the costs of replacing the wooden building in evaluating the 75% threshold. Mr. Drebin's appraisal states that the wooden pier has zero value. In a worst case scenario, if this means that the wooden pier must be replaced, the replacement cost according to Mr. Drebin's appraisal is $3,075,000. Adding this to the repair cost of the wooden building results in repairs totaling 58%, which is still well below the 75% threshold. APPEAL - 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 foundation. There was no movement involved that would prevent repair under the terms of the 2005 Hearing Examiner decision. DECISION The appeal is sustained. The Building Official's February 22, 2011 determination is reversed and the building is found to meet the criteria for reconstructions under ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D). DATED this 5th day of June, 2011. Phil A. Olbrechts City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner Appeal Right and Valuation Notices This land use decision is final and only subject to appeal to superior court as governed by Chapter 36.70C RCW. Appeal deadlines are short (21 days from issuance of the decision) and the courts strictly apply the procedural requirements for filing an appeal. Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 9 The staff report makes the argument that ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) only allows the repair of buildings and that this is distinguishable from replacing a building that is completely destroyed. The language of both provisions does not support this interpretation. ECDC 17.40.020(F) expressly applies to buildings that have been damaged or "destroyed". ECDC 23.10.220(D) only mentions that it applies to buildings that have been damaged, but there is no limit to the amount of damage. Further, since the marina as a whole must be considered in the application of these provisions the relevant inquiry would be whether the entire marina facility has been destroyed as opposed to just the wooden building. ECDC 17.40.020(F) and ECDC 23.10.220(D) both allow "reconstruction" if the 75% threshold is met. Reconstruction includes the replacement of an entirely destroyed building that is part of a larger marina facility. APPEAL - 14 AGENDA HEARING EXAMINER Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North May 19, 2011 3:00 - 5:00 P.M. Call to Order 2. Public Hearings a. The Meadowdale Marina LLC has appealed a Type II administrative decision by the City Building Official that prevents the reconstruction of a destroyed nonconforming building or structure in accordance with ECDC 17.40.020.F. The Building Official determination notes that the damage to the structure exceeds the 75% thresholds allowed by chapter 17.40 ECDC and Shoreline Master Program for re-establishment of a nonconforming use and that it must be removed. The site is located at 16111 76th Place West. (File No. APL20110001). 3. Adjournment CITY OF EDMONDS 3 121 5T" AVENUE N. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 (425) 771-0215 v FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATION: 16111 76th Place w BUSINESS NAME: Meadowdale Marine/006 MAILING ADDRESS: BUSINESS OWNER: EMERGENCY-1: Milosavigevic, V. (Milo) KEY ACCESS-2: Ir) FIRE PREVENTION SAFETY SURVEY PHONE: 4257432211 HOME PHONE: HOME PHONE: 2063536456 HOME PHONE: FREQUENCY STATION & SHIFT 365 16 C DATE DUES ► 11/01/10 UFIR ► 898 577 1 `507 PREFIRE lo PERSON CONTACTED: INITIAL INSPECTION DATE L NAME OF INSPECTOR: nn. -2,Q I l q I LS I-L - L J9 -- l o FIRE AS 9/03-Dry System Only SYSTEMS: FE _t_ ANNUAL HAZARDS FOUND AND LOCATIONS / COMMUNICATIONS Q S �Q ENTER CODEy1�OINC ONCE ► VIOLATION CODE 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 1st RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: 2nd RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: EXTENSION GRANTED TO: FINAL RE -INSPECTION DATE DUE: VIOLATIONS CITED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CONTACTED: 1 INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: 2 DATE: DATE: DATE: _ 3 VIOLATIONS 1 5 VIOLATIONS 1 15 PRE -CITATION LETTER SENT CITATION ISSUED i NUMBER: 4 2 6 2 6 DATE: CODE SECTION: 5 3 7 3 7 RETURN RECEIPT RECEIVED 6 4 8 4 B DATE: DISPOSITION: - 7 8 LETTER NEEDED i� YES NO LETTER NEEDED 0 YES NO FIRE DEPARTMENT COPY fnC.18°�0 January 2, 2008 CITY OF EDMONDS CITY HALL • THIRD FLOOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0247 • FAX (425) 771-0252 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Dear Meadowdale Marina neighbors, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Thank you for your letter about your concerns about the marina. Because the author didn't sign the letter, I will respond to all of you who signed the petition. I will respond in order to the, issues you have raised: 1.) Removal and addition of the structure and arrival of small boats late at night. As you have stated in your letter, ordinary repairs and maintenance are allowed. Any strange activity at night should be reported to the police by calling 911. 2.) For what purpose does Mr. Milosavljevic want to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars? Again, as you have noted, the City of Edmonds will not give the owner a permit to operate any new business other than previously operated. Nothing has changed. The owner has the right to rebuild the dock under current law. We can't prevent him from doing that, but we can control his uses. We don't have the right to ask him why he wants to spend his money the way he chooses. 3.) We haven't seen any plans for the dock or the intentions of the City in reviewing applications. We haven't either! No plans have been submitted to the city for any work on the dock. The owner has hired engineers to study the rebuilding of the pier, and they have not submitted any plans. Should they eventually do so, they still don't have to tell us what they intend to do with it once it is rebuilt. But as I have said —and as you are well aware —the future uses are limited to what was there previously. We will review any submitted plans just as we do any other property owner's plans. 4.) Traffic will increase and more people will be killed by trains. While I would like to think that the creation of a neighborhood park would be welcomed by the surrounding property owners, apparently that isn't true. Trains kill people because people do stupid stuff, not because of the creation of a new park. We cannot legislate stupidity. You state that you have serious objections if the dock is to be used for other businesses... Once again, so does the City. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 5.) To our knowledge there have been no studies conducted... There is no reason for any studies to be conducted by anyone. No plans have been submitted that would require any studies. The rebuilding of the dock, if attempted, would have to adhere to all State and City requirements to proceed. 6.) We also expect the Mayor to be more involved with this issue. I could not be more involved than I already am. Our response to you may sound monotonous; however, we have steadfastly given you the same answers each time anyone in the neighborhood has asked. To be clear, the owner can rebuild the pier and he can spend his money any way he chooses, but he cannot change the use from what it has always been. One additional issue that you didn't raise but I will respond to anyway is that of fire response. The water to the pier has been turned off, additionally, the decking is not safe for our firefighters to walk upon if necessary. Should a fire occur, we will respond with our fire boat and we will fight the fire from the shoreline. Our firefighters will only go onto the pier if someone's life is in danger. Please feel free to call me or my staff with any questions that you may have. A petition is not necessary to get our attention; Mr. Milosavljevic has already done that. Sincerely, Gary Haaken on Mayor GH\lbc C:\Mayor08\MeadowdaleMarinaNeighborsLtr.doe Attachment: Letter with petition City Council (w/attach) Duane Bowman, Development Services Director (w/ attach) Tom Tomberg, Fire Chief (w/ attach) Rob Chave, Planning Manager (w/ attach) Sandy Chase, City Clerk (w/ attach) 4 December 31, 2007 To: Honorable Gary Haakenson, Mayor of Edmonds 121 5h Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Cc: Edmonds City Council Subject: Meadowdale Dock OEC 31 2007 ED:NI(Y-�0S CITY CLERK ?-3'yq.1 We, the undersigned residents, are becoming increasingly concerned regarding activities occurring at the Meadowdale Dock. Recently, we have noticed the removal and addition of portions of the structure and the arrival and departure of small boats late at night. Portions of the structure have ended up in Puget Sound. The State and City shoreline regulations may allow Mr. Milosavljevic to do ordinary repair and maintenance and to return the structure to its original condition and purpose. A City of Edmonds official told us, "that the city will not give a permit to the owner of the dock to operate any new type of business, other than that operated there previously." For what purpose then does Mr. Milosavljevic want to spend hundreds of thousand dollars, if not millions, to rebuild the dock? It is clear that he does not plan to use the dock just for housing boats. We have not seen any information that describes the plans for the dock or the intentions of the City in reviewing permit applications. It is our understanding that the State Shorelines Management Act and the City's Shoreline regulations allow only water - dependent uses such as a boat house. Residential units, restaurants, offices and retail shops are not water dependent and should not be allowed. With development of the City Park to be built next summer, traffic will increase in our residential neighborhood adding noise and further increasing the frequency of people killed by trains. We do not want to have any more noise or traffic generated by a major new commercial development in our neighborhood. We have serious objections if the dock is to be used for any other businesses. Additionally, attracting more activity at that location will only exacerbate an already highly dangerous situation with the railroad traffic. Just a reminder, people have been killed at this crossing. To our knowledge, there have been no environmental, traffic or noise studies conducted. We fear for the quiet, safety and security of our community, particularly after the recent shooting/stabbing in our immediate vicinity. We request a response from the City addressing these serious issues. We also expect the Mayor to be more involved with this issue. Sincerely yours, ,- Address Name 2 31 Z� DIA. 3 4 L LAJ '%(c7 4161&1r- 6 01 0 -- �? S t,�, h L . k2 7 8 42, 9 7 'A/ --%trliJ A 10 j 0 12TAN 14 144o2® 7 * 'Ar/t,- 15 '.i 16 17 18 19 20 /Glo y6L PI N� 21 j: 22 1 v 5 t.. w ✓ , :, �> ,; 23 > 24 25 27 28 29 30 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 5:47 PM To: Clifton, Stephen Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: Meadowdale Marina Stephen: Chief Tomberg copied me on your inquiry to Mr. Haug. City had Pre -application meeting with Mr. Milosavljevic, CG Engineering, et al... They are going forward with replacing concrete for wood pilings, now directly through the roof (cannot move the building due to Shoreline issues). John Message Pagel of 2 Tomberg, Thomas From: Clifton, Stephen �((� Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 2:13 PM To: 'Haug, Glen E' Cc: Smith, Thomas R; Haakenson, Gary; Bowman, Duane; Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE: BN Fiber Hi Glen, I'm writing to ask about work performed recently at the location below. Le, WSDOT location #085446S At subject location, there are two rail lines. As a part of BNSF repairing/replacing rail lines, concrete -has been removed between one of the rail line's two rails. The removed concrete has been placed along the east side of the eastern most rail line. This effectively eliminates vehicular access across the rail lines and to Meadowdale Marina aka Leighbuton Wharf. Can you tell me whether additional work will be performed at this location and if so, what kind? If the final outcome is to remove concrete between the rails of each rail line, it seems there would no longer be a need to sound train horns at this location. If you have questions, please call or send me an e-mail. Thank you and Happy New Year, Stephen F'•' w tw Z ,,Haws Street Name: Meadowdale Marina WSDOT NO.: 085446S Warning Device: Crossbucks and Stop Sign 1/2/2008 Message Page 1 of 1 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:17 PM To: 'mikes@cgengineering.com' Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina & Fire Apparatus Access Thanks Mike. Merry Christmas -----Original Message ----- From: Mike Spano [mailto:mikes@cgengineering.com] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 11:45 AM To: Westfall, John Cc: jaredu@cgengineering.com; mikem@cgengineering.com Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina & Fire Apparatus Access John — Thanks for the information. I would think that a truck turn around on the pier would be necessary and we should be able to strip it in the plans. We will be in contact and hopefully meet again after we get some preliminary design work completed. The preliminary design will take several weeks to prepare. Mike From: Westfall, John[mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 10:17 AM To: mikes@cgengineering.com Cc: Bullis, Ann; Graf, Jeannine; Smith, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina & Fire Apparatus Access Mr. Spano: Fire truck access onto pier will be required with approved turnaround on deck. 20' min drive width, 13'6 vertical clearance. Thank you, John Westfall Edmonds Fire Marshal 425 771-0213 12/21 /2007 FILE COPY' MEMORANDUM Date: December 20, 2007 To: Development Services Lead Theresa Umbaugh From: John Westfall, Fire Marshal (425) 771-0213 Subject: Preapplication: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76t" PI W The Fire Department provides the following comments and corrections in accordance with the 2006 International Fire Code, NFPA 303 (2006) FIRE PROTECTION STANDARD FOR MARINAS AND BOATYARDS and Edmonds Community Development Code. 1. Fire and Police Departments are at this time under severe restrictions for access and response to this property due to existing hazards of structure and loss of fire protection system. 2. Proposal is a greater step toward resumption of property protection services by Edmonds Fire Department and its automatic aid agencies. Final approval will include re-evaluation of public safety access concerns. 3. Architectural plans are not addressed in this pre -application. Existing conditions must be evaluated and approved prior to building occupancy approvals. Cc: Mr. Mike Maechler CG Engineering Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg Assistant Building Official Ann Bullis ) Z (zo %'7 6 ie-t✓ ice 5s, � City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Marshal d Westfall, John From: Westfall, John " , Sent: Thursday, Dedem6e'r20,' 2007 1"01 PM To: Umbaugh, Theresa Cc: Chief Tomberg; Bullis, Ann; Smith, Mike Subject: Preapp Meadowdale Marina.doc L Preapp dowdale Marina.doc •1 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:01 PM To: Umbaugh, Theresa Cc: Chief Tomberg; Bullis, Ann; Smith, Mike Subject: Preapp Meadowdale Marina.doc Preapp dowdale Marina.doc e ` i Aof En,y U N City of Edmonds �St. i g9° PRE -APPLICATION COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION DATE December 20, 2007 STAFF: Ann Bullis, Assistant Building Official RE: Meadowdale Marina A preliminary review was done with the pre -application materials provided and we have the following comments. 1) Codes in effect at the time of this meeting: a) 2006 International Building Code (including Accessibility) with State Amendments b) 2006 International Mechanical Code (including International Fuel Gas Code) with State Amendments c) 2006 International Fire Code with State Amendments d) 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code with State Amendments e) 2006 Washington State Energy Code (WAC 5 1 -11) f) 2006 Washington State Ventilation Indoor Air Quality Code (WAC 51-13) g) Edmonds Community Development Code 2). Provide Statement of Qualifications for all State licensed design professionals for this project. 3) A geotechnical report is required. 4) Peer review will be required for this project and peer review fees are paid by the applicant. 5) Plans must show compliance with IBC requirements for Flood Resistant Construction. 6) Provide a detailed sequence of events for this project from beginning to end. 7) Provide construction plans and structural evaluation for the proposed building to be moved. The structural evaluation must include repairs to be made prior to the move and after the move. Note the Type of Construction, existing and proposed occupancy(ies), occupant load calculations, number of stories, show all exits, accessibility, etc. See City Commercial handout for minimum submittal requirements for this project. 8) Provide a structural evaluation for the existing steel building and provide construction plans for the repairs. Note the Type of Construction, existing and proposed occupancy(ies), occupant load calculations, number of stories, show all exits, accessibility, etc. See City Commercial handout for minimum submittal requirements for this project. 9) List all deferred submittals on the cover sheet of the plans. The City prefers that mechanical and plumbing plans be included with and issued with the main building permit to help avoid any construction delays, however they can be deferred. Other common deferred items are fire sprinkler, fire alarm, signs, side sewer, water meter, shop drawings, State electrical, State elevator, etc. 10) Complete the State Non -Residential Energy and Ventilation worksheets and submit with your permit application. Worksheets can be found on the following website: http://www.neec.net/resources/resources.html 11) Contact Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator, at 425-771-0235 regarding dumpster enclosure location and size. 12) Contact Linda McMurphy, Cross -connection Control Specialist, at 425-771-0235 regarding premise isolation requirements to protect the public water system. Building Division Pre -application Comments 1 IN FREQUENTLY OVERLOOKED ITEMS The following is a list of frequently overlooked items that apply to many projects. They are listed as a tool to help minimize corrections required during plan review. General • Incomplete submittals, insufficient number of copies, plans not separated out • General coordination of all plans not done prior to permit submittal nor throughout resubmittals (architectural, structural, landscape, civil, mechanical, plumbing, fire sprinkler, etc.) • Overall coordination of plans with details clearly and accurately referenced throughout the plans as to where they apply.. For example, a fire rated wall must be clearly identified and refer to a construction detail that accurately describes how the wall is to be constructed so it meets the listed and tested assembly requirements, including insulation for sound transmission control if applicable, and the listed and tested assembly provided. • Deferred submittals and separate permits not called out on plans • Site plan, landscape plan and civil plan not to same scale —usually a vast difference between landscape plan and civil for parking space width, planters, patios, drivewaywidth, location of electrical equipment, parking spaces, etc. • Shoring plan not submitted with initial application or submitted very late in the process; plans show shoring extending onto adjacent private property or into City RW • Energy calculations deferred to mechanical permit submittal, energy submitted late which affects framing approval • Allowable area calculations not provided with permit application, yards on site plans not adequately shown • Fire hydrant locations not specified at pre -application meeting • Structures that require a permit are shown on landscape plans not on architecturals • Stairs, landings, walkways, ramps, architectural projections, cantilevers, bay windows, etc. not shown on site plans • Garage headroom to obstructions such as sprinkler heads, pipes, ducts, beams, insulation • Plans do not clearly show that a return air plenum will be provided which can affect other architectural code issues. Fire Resistive Construction • Fire ratings and locations of required occupancy separations, fire walls, horizontal separation walls, exit passageways, corridors, exterior walls, etc not clearly specified on floor plans and in section views • Listed and tested fire -rated assemblies not specified on plans and do not match construction details • Listed and tested fire -rated assemblies and details showing structural frame protection (such as for columns and beams) not provided on plans, including those within wall and floor -ceiling assemblies • Fire -stopping details and products not specified on plans, or listed as a deferred submittal. • Fire rated corridor detail not provided • Column jacketing in parking garage to protect fire -resistive covering from damage Mechanical/Plumbinia • If plumbing is a deferred submittal, it is commonly submitted for permit without adequate time for the City to review, process and issue the permit, thereby holding up the underground plumbing work on site. Building Division Pre -application Comments 2 Y • Locations of all fire/smoke dampers not shown on mechanical plans • Routing of exhaust ducts,,,dryer vents, gas appliance vents, HVAC ductwork not coordinated prior to issuance of main permit • Locations and construction details of all mechanical shafts not provided on plans • Mechanical exhaust outlet locations, especially for parking garage exhaust not shown on floor plans, roof plans, sections and elevations (generator location not approved by ADB and placed in setback areas) • Appropriate cross -connection control devices provided at the property line on domestic water line, fire sprinkler line, and irrigation line. • Appropriate cross -connection control devices provided on fixtures within the building. Exiting • General exiting configuration not submitted at pre -application meeting, creates redesign- in many cases • Exit enclosure must exit directly to the outside or to an exit passageway • Elevators not permitted to open into exit passageways, lobbies not provided when required • Occupant load calculations not included with permit application • Common path of exit travel not shown. Accessibility • Accessible signage location and details not provided on plans • Accessible means of egress and areas of refuge not shown on plans • Length and width of accessible parking space not shown on plans • Accessible cross walk not provided with in route of travel when crossing vehicular drive aisles • Accessible route of travel not complete nor adequately detailed on the plans. For example, from the public way (sidewalk) to the main building entrance, from the accessible parking space(s) to the building entrance, to mailboxes, dumpsters, and accessory buildings, and throughout building. Detail ramps, slopes, handrails, landings, width of path of travel, etc. Building Division Pre -application Comments 3 1. PROJECT MEETING FOR: M EADOWDALE MARINA Meeting called by: CG Engineering Facilitator: Attendees: Milo Milosavljevic (Owner), Chevy Chase (CG), Mike Spano (CG), Mike Maechler (CG) City Representatives: AGENDA ITEMS CIVIL: 1. Storm water quality • Can we hang water quality vault from slab? 2. Sanitary sewer 3. Water supply • Fireflow requirements? 4. Misc. (Lighting, bollards, striping, etc.) • Per City standard details? Date: 12/ 19/ 07 Time: 1:30pm Location: City of Edmonds 5. Access • Trestle width? (Navy recommendation: 15ft fire lane + 2.5ft buffer each side = 20ft) • Additional City requirements for walkway? (4ft wide per Corps permit w/ light -permeable grating) STRUCTURAL: 1. Codes • IBC 2006, ASCE 7-05 (gravity and lateral loads) • AASHTO (For traffic loads and guardrails) • UFC 4-152-01 (Dept. of Defense Manual for Piers and Wharves) • Additional Codes required by City? 2. Minimum Loads (City -required) • Minimum uniform LL? • Fire truck? • % of LL to include in lateral design? • Additional loads required by City? • Tsunamiloads? PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTIFICATION & PLANS Date: 12/7/2007 To: Building ❑ Engineering ❑ Fire XPlanning ❑ From: Jana ❑ Linda Meeting Date: THURSDAY, DECEMER 20, 2007 Meeting Time: 1:30 Applicant C G ENGINEERING Contact MIKE MAECHLER Attached are the plans for the meeting scheduled above. /Vy�,4"r- nfFfit 703 - aG Sec_ cw 46 cc: Mr. Bowman D:MyDocuments1Spe11man/Pfre-App Meetings'Pre-App Notify to Staff C:rrm,pn,m:/Prc-App Mating Fom,/Prc-APp Nrnifyv, s,aff City of Edmonds DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 Friday, December 07, 2007 Your request for a Pre -Application meeting has been accepted by the City of Edmonds. The meeting is scheduled for: 12/20/2007 at 1:30 PM . We Strongly suggest that all lead design professionals associated with the project attend this meeting. Application Number: PRE20070025 PROP OWNER: MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 23423 BRIER RD BRIER, WA 98036 Project Address: 16111 76TH PL W, EDMONDS Work Description: REPLACEMENT OF MEADOWDALEMARINA PIER To view up to date information about your permit please visit the City of Edmonds Development Services website at ht1p.1Avww.ci.edmonds.wa.us. OF EDP #B58 N Pre -Application Meeting INFORMATION SHEET You are encouraged to schedule a 45-minute Pre -Application Meeting with the Development Services Department prior to making a formal submittal. Pre -application appointments are held on Thursdays starting at 1:30 p.m. To make an appointment, you must bring five (5) folded plans to a Permit Coordinator on a Thursday two weeks before your scheduled meeting. The Permit Coordinator will look over the plans and if complete, will ask the receptionist to schedule an appointment for you. You must make your appointment in person (second floor City Hall 121 5th Avenue North). If you have questions, please call 425.771.0220 and the receptionist will be glad to help you. There is a $565 fee charged for Pre -Application Meetings. However, if you then follow through and apply for a building permit, 50% of that fee will be applied toward the building permit. Staff from the Development Services and Fire Departments will be attending this meeting to provide their comments and answer your questions. The information provided to you at this meeting will identify any MAJOR issues involving your project. A pre -application is NOT A FORMAL SUBMITTAL. Future submittals made on a site which has first been reviewed at a Pre -Application Meeting may have issues arise which have not been raised or addressed during the pre -application process MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PLANS �,1'Assessor's Parcel Number 1�North Location Map Arrow /Drawings to Scale 15/ Streets, Dimension Setbacks (building footprint) arking Requirements - bra e- 51,,,ACE-;; r.4_ &_-1p&0ye_r Intended Occupancy Use, Type f Constr ctio!1,Number of Units, Number of Stories 00 ct{A}. �otal Building Square Footage 4Z 00 v r , ddress (SToc.A, wtitix' xisting and Proposed Zoning coy A►'1�fu-tRt— �T . Property Lines 12. Trash Enclosure Location and Orientation ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR PLANS - IF APPLICABLE (The more information provided the better we will be able to assist you.) 1. Easements -VlExisting & Proposed Structures 3. Existing Topographical Lines & Proposed Slopes �Jo c WA Q C)E 4. Lot Drainage Patterns 5. Landscaped Areas 6. Proposed Elevations (all four sides) 7. Number of Stories Po c I4AQ 4e 8. Location of Sewage Disposal or Proposed Method 9. ,Barrier Free Parking 1g. Pedestrian Site Access AIL,^t eqb Whew41e Usnarenemp/tana/Nre App Mtg Forms/Pre-App Info Sheet.doc Revised 9/14/07 401. Y �• { e7 G�y.la �, 1 ue. I ♦ Oi .• / 1 SA 39 ` .a 1 i 1 s 11 \ �• D•s / Ile 27 1 404 119 79 .J i ), ... co•t •.+�A.S~ )w.' •A• ! p6 ,/109 d�tr�1 1 1 64 c y s 31 1 l,�•� s� •i e� �' • { t 1 100 � 106 1 39 - 5{ 5 2{ 1 v ✓ G 20 ,1 49 s ll s t 9 6 51 q/ 71 o -4 1 � 1 76 u D SI 16 OS It 11 ': b.fl�J 12D `''•,\. • l Sw I Q $10 05° 9 4b 37 s 1 »I 4 se 14 102 1 1 81 ' 1 ID / 129 O 150b G PSIot R ° 1 104 1 14 1D 20 118 •".1 1 29 86 '071lot 62 1� �. as S. 1 15 23 1 l 110 • 6 3 ps ,lO 115 I1 P06tT SOUND 0, 1 .� 103 44 ` s s. 03 ' DO 95 w 114 IG IB 59 28 80 /4.UkM 1� Ifllw _ t. 2 (� 1 20 )i .. 87 1� 92 00 95 Iw .t 2%1 99 G�ROJEBIITE "�° :. 5e I zlo4 > O t w r 99 sr 11.1 y �11 so 05 / T 24 sOnG4n 77 62 1 2 �l 101 r G 1 05 •�I N1B O-I1_ 112 91 Y NrG 19 Y 66 /D6 30 `1�•• LY7 Z O , DS < � 1i• •- tip' Cy 6 ti ` 9i 93 e7 27 53 103 97 r;l 91 9 . 90 i • i 10 57 1 C I 92 79 1 e9 f �" �c 6 Ai 69 ..�•- • •+ ••�• f • ••� �`t I fYnnvntl •• Aw,.,,__Ly p� '� b5w_l D] 190 Gr. �.++ �Yl% % .Elwood• /\ � � � r� . •.TI.�MK lth .�,Il '11 DS nj o �� SM 1 S r `'` •.•r • c . sm S� Dl �r35 S...r 7 •• ' / • 1 � I01 2� Bf Bn B 57,' 1h - WP06.rc 1M'Y •� ti 8 1 _ l ' I I1 v,.. Ro. r1 ire IN t r v1 dud• A j 48.J. `�q2` 2 J 1 e. • ) 114•K' 15 1 102 1 103 • . ' c leirw COYe 43 SOS �• •+ '� - ' 1 50 j M I I • y• • 16 1 c/ A 00 r 1 �. •R un 105 R.lr D]t7• ]5 (' _ loll I I 1 6' T c 111001I7R[•INOtn 11—h VICINITY MAP SOURCE: NOAA CHART NO.18"1 NAUTICAL MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 YARDS 1000 0 5000 PROJECT LOCATION: LAT = 47'51'10" LONG = 122.20'06" PURPOSE: REPAIR EXISTING PIER DATUM: MLLW=0.00' EX FISHING PLATFORM TO BE REMOVED EX CREOSOTE _ TREATED TIMBER PILES, TYP EX TIMBER FENDER PILES, TYP q EX�BOATLIFT TO BE REMOVED -:;' EX STE\ PIPE PILE, TYP b EX BOAT LIFT APPROX. OHWM= MHHW=10.91'---, EX TIMBER PILES, PILE CAPS STRINGERS AND DECKING TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ORMER FISHING PILE PILES, CONCRETE P PLATFORM -NOT PILE CAPS AND CONCRETE DECKING. TO BE REPLACED 390.28 I 80' a �`\—� EX HOLDING TANK' LLW=0.00' PLATFORM 22't \ (TO BE REMOVED)-, F�-IH f i7 p •\ , 200'f . , . . \ \ '5' \ SEX TIMBER BUILDING — I ' (TO REPAIRED) 4 , jrFACE OF EX MBEIj WHARF ) Az \ \5EX STEEL BLDG, CONCRETE DECK AIR AS NEEDED) X CONC. BATTER PILES, 3 TYP FACE OF CONC. *THE REMOVABLE STAGING FLOATS USED FOR DECK AND STEEL TEMPORARY BOAT MOORAGE ASSOCIATED WITH BUILDING ABOVE - THE EXISTING BOATUFTS ARE NOT SHOWN. OHWM-ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: Lj \ \ 1 0 \-3'35'37' Q RADIUS=5118.88 LLJ ro LENGTH=321.05 LINE NO. BEARING DISlANCEl L1 N23'4O'23 W 30.41 L2 N33'5156-W 30.41' L3 N34'4SO7'W 27.47' L4 N2755'44'W 27.4 L5 N201VWW 25.58' EXISTING SITE PLAN 40' 0' 80' 6 I� F'-EX TIMBER APPROACH TRESTLE L: (TO BE REPLACED) I , 7 'I L , I� � RIPRAP LEGEND: Q - EX TIMBER PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE STEEL CONSTRUCTION. ®- EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED - EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN NOTE: LOCATION OF EXISTING CONIC. AND STEEL PILES BASED UPON ORIGINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED APPROX. *OHWM=MHHW=10.91' EX TIMBER PILES, PILE CAPS STRINGERS AND DECKING TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH q CONCRETE/STEEL PILES, CONCRETE PILE CAPS l� AND CONCRETE DECKING. FORMER FISHING �9p= PLATFORM -NOT TO -44 p�� I ' BE REPLACED c ey N \ EX HOLDING TANK MLLW=0.00' PLATFORM 2Y* •` �\ (TO BE REMOVED) FISHING 'PLATFORM • � •'� � 1 • p 1 TO BE REMOVED 2wi I 1 EX CREOSOTE 1i2 ATED \ (APPROACH TRESTLE)I L.LI < TIMBER PILES, TYP\ > X\ MBER BUILDING I Q EX TIMBER (TO REPAIRED) LLl I I� FENDER PILES TYP =3'35'37" Q it RADIUS=5118.88 Q BOATUFT*TO I \ LENGTH=321.05 p N) BE REMOVED, ', O I o ui 1 1 FACE OF EX TIMBER WHARF \ EX ROCK RIPRAP" I `i g I EMBANKMENT }� _b TEEL PIPE SEX PLUMB I PILE\TYP - CONC. PILES X BOAT\UFT EX STEEL BLDG EX CONIC. BATTER PLATFORMS OVER,,CONCRETE DECK PILES. TYP (REPAIRS NEEDED) _ 2W:k A `HS FACE OF CONC. \ p6 227.75 a J DECK AND STEEL \ SB dd�?3 BUILDING ABOVE NA9' �3. *OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK 90 SEE SHEETS 5 AND 6 \ FOR SECTION A -A do B-B 'o EXISTING PILE PLAN o' 60' 30' PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER I EGENn: IN: PUGET SOUND - EX CREOSOTE TREATED TIMBER EX TIMBER PIER TO BE E] AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS PILE (APPROX. LOCATION) REPLACED WITH CONCRETE COUNTY: SNOHOMISH - EX PLUMB CONC. PILES AND STEEL CONSTRUCTION. STATE: WASHINGTON -- EX CONIC. OCT. BATTER PILES 2H:12V DIRECTION OF BATTER, TYP ®- EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC — EX CONIC, OCT. BATTER PILES 4H:12V SHEET: 3 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 • — EX STEEL PIPE PILE _ EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN. REV: 01/19/2006 _OACH ISTLE. TI EX PIER TO BE REPLACED REPLACED WITH CONCRETE & WITH CONCRETE & STEEL , STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION —� \ \ ROPOSED VERTICAL APPROX. I ' GUARDRAIL 1 *OHWM=MHHW=10.91' LLW=0.0Q' I RO?OSED GUARD— c ROPOSED LIGHT I 1 RAILING, TYP ` PERMEABLE GRATING o ' o ❑ o PROPOSED CONC. PIER \* I �{ EXISTING I� o • ❑ ❑ a ❑ CREOSOTE —TREATED TIMBER Lu �_ _ PILES UNDER PIER & APP fL^IDER PILES, TYP • \ ROACH TRESTLE TO BE •• •• •• •• REMOVED, AND REPLACED WITH Lu I § \ STEEL & CONCRETE PILES. J • \ EX TIMBER P ❑ — ! • • •� • • — — — ❑ BUILDING (TO +i REPAIRED) ' ' O ❑ o _ RELOCATE EXISTING I w Q� BUILDING TO NORTH AS • • — — I — 1• • / iIMBEFcFiAlt� — — • NEED TO REPLACE PILES, I `� DECK, ETC. UNDER BUILDING r� ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,- „ riiev.•.viir ✓ rirwiriiii ri uii, iiiiiii.viiiri�Mriirii+..v.....y ,..., ,,, \ \ 1 1 a �i119 ALL EXISTING CONCRETE AND ' STEEL PILES UNDER THIS \ EX STEEL BLDG OVER! BUILDING TO REMAIN (REPAIR \ CONC. DECK \ ANY DAMAGE TO PILES AND r� \ (REPN�Ti AS NEEDED) — CAPS IN PLACE AS NEEDED) i'� it 2s0'* _ FACE OF CONC. DECK — AND STEEL BUILDING \ *OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK \ SEE SHEETS 7 AND 8 PROPOSED PILE PLAN & REPAIRS FOR SECTION C—C & D—D LEM& ❑ — PROPOSED LIGHT PERMEABLE STEEL GRATING (16 LOCATIONS) • — PLUMB CONC. OR STEEL PILES CONC. OR STEEL BATTER PILES 2H:1V DIRECTION OF BATTER, TYP •— CONC. OR STEEL BATTER PILES 4H:12V — EX STEEL PIPE PILE •— REPLACEMENT FENDER PILE (ACZA TREATED TIMBER) 0' 60' 30' EX TIMBER PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE AND STEEL CONSTRUCTION. — EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED ®— EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN. PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 4 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 01/19/2006 0 PROPOSED STEEL • °. ' -, PROPOSED 60% LIGHT GRATING DETAIL .', • PERMEABLE STEEL GRATING • ; a , ' W. ' 0' 40' A d .� • a` SLOPE DRIANAGE • • :'• :• : ,2' :.� FROM GRATING SEE THIS SHEET FOR GRATING DETAIL a' r - -li-a . •w ° ° ' a ., '' ' •' PROPOSED `.' ; . :° °'... REINFORCE .'• CONC DECK PROPOSED REPAIRS TO ' ' " • ' • .. . , EXISTING PIER ' a r' i°•' •' �% IN: PUGET SOUND - •ram• .'/\.•/\ %� •/\%\':./\°%� AT. 11CAr%^lllr%AI C E'rlkl klr%tl GRATING DETAIL ,' Iiiiiiie!T!n 0' 2' EX TIMBER DECK ' PLANKS, TYP EX TIMBER /_ STRINGER, TYP EX CREOSOTE —TREATED TIMBER PILE CAP r—EX GRADE /—APPROX. DECK EL=17.5't OHWM=MHHW MHHW=10.91' MHW=10.06' EX CREOSOTE —TREATED TIMBER PILES, TYP (PILE SPACING VARIES 10' TO 16') ,K7 MLLW=0.0' II�IL Ik\IL NOTE: EXISTING GUARDRAILS NOT SHOWN OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION A -A EXISTING PIER CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL 2.5' 0' 5' PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 6 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 01/19/2006 EX TIMBER STRINGER, TYP 10' DRIVING LANE -EX TIMBER DECK PLANKS, TYP 10' DRIVING LANE 1 EX CREOSOTE -TREATED PILE CAP K7MHHW=10.91' ,K7 MHW=10.06' _ *OHWM=MHHW GRADE ... ... MLLW=0.0' -I II II I EX CREOSOTE -TREATED TIMBER PILES, TYP (PILE III I� SPACING VARIES 7' TO 8'f) SECTION B-B EXISTING TYPICAL APPROACH TRESTLE CONSTRUCTION 2.5' O' S' * OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 7 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 01/19/2006 PROPOSED PRESTRESSED PRE -CAST CONC. DECK PANELS, TYP PROPOSED CAST -IN- PLACE CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB APPROX. DECK EL=17.5't ,d ,• PROPOSED CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. PILE CAP PROPOSED STEEL OR PRECAST CONCRETE PILES (PILE SPACING VARIES 16' TO 20') - , I''I I 'I. I I -I IT, III= II II II II II NOTE: PROPOSED GUARDRAILS NOT SHOWN 7 MHHW=10.91' ... K7 MHW=10.06' *OHWM=MHHW II II II II *OHWM=ORIDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION C-C PROPOSED TYPICAL REPLACEMENT PROPOSED REPAIRS TO PIER CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND 2.5' AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS 0' S' COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 8 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 01 / 19/2006 LIGHT 10' DRIVING LANE 10' DRIVING LANE PROPOSED VERTICAL PROPOSED GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL PROPOSED PEDEDESTRIA 8' 4' 8' WALKWAY 4' EL. 17.5't PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED VEHICLE PERMEABLE GRATING GUARDRAIL, TYP Ti • .... PROPOSED PROPOSED LIGHT CAST -IN -PLACE PERMEABLE CONC. PILE CAP GRATING 5't 9' 9'JCONC. 11f *OHWM=MHHW „MHHW=1 . . ... ... .. � MHW=10.06' PROPOSED STEEL PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED STEEL OR SUPPORT BEAMS CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. PRESTRESSE PRECAST CONCRETE FOR WALKWAY TOPPING SLAB, TYP DECK PANEPILE, TYP SEX IV- 21 1 '� III lil III- �2 12 I 1 I 112 II II �I 11 II �I II II �1 II II �1 II II �1 11 II �1 *oHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION D-D PROPOSED REPLACEMENT PROPOSED REPAIRS TO APPROACH TRESTLE EXISTING PIER 2.5' IN: PUGET SOUND o' s' AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 9 OF 9 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 01 /19/2006 Snohomish County, WA Assess -'arcel Data Page 1 of 2 Snohom i h Online Government Information $F Services C 0- unfi r4 Washington Y R E A L Y Property Information County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us. Date/Time:10/9/2007 3:33:59 PM Answers to Freauently Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window) Return to Property Information Entry page Parcel Number 00513900100700 Prev Parcel Reference 51390010070004 View Man of this parcel (opens as new window) General Information Taxpayer Name 11 Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and Address Changes Owner Name 11 Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the information on Name and Address Changes After a Sale Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 16111 76TH PL W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026-4551 Parcel Legal Description MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-00 - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A Go to top of page Treasurer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as new window) 2007 Taxes for this parcel $2,131.11 (Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges; if any, are not included.) To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-388-3366 to request it by phone. Go to top of page Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2007 tax year. Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window) For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessor's Office Property Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons Values exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. httn://web5.co.Snohnmi.ln.wn iic/nrnncvc/Acr-Tr-Prr%nTnn/PrnTnn(17_Pornclnn+. .,, QDAT—AA 1n/ninnn I Snohomish County, WA Assess( parcel Data Page 2 of 2 Tax Year 2007 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total $240,000 Tax Year 2008 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total $240,000 Go to top of page Valuation and Property Tax History View Histo _ (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Characteristics Tax Code Area (TCA) 00217 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window) Use Code 749 Other Recreation NEC Size Basis ACRE Size 2.17 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels) Go to top of page Property Structures Type Yr.Built Structure Description Commercial 1920 MEADOWDALE MARINE BOAT STG View Structure Data (opens as new window) Commercial 1976 View Structure Data (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Sales since 7/31/1999 Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window) Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor. Transfer Receipt Sales Excise Deed Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Other Parcels Date Date Price Number Type 10/7/2002 10/9/2002 $0 370965 QC STEPANOVIC MEADOWDALE MARINA No SLOBODANKA LLC 5/30/2001 6/1/2001 $300,000 264925 W PHASE 1 LTD STEPANOVIC No SLOBODANKA Go to top of page Property Maps Township/Range/Section/Quarter, links to maps Neighborhood 5506000 Explanation of Neighborhood Code (opens as new window) Township 27 Range 04 Section 06 Quarter SE Find parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section View Man of this parcel (opens as new window) httD:Hweb5.co.snohomish.wa.us/nronsys/Asr-Tr-PronTnn/PrnTnnn?-PnrraiTlatn acn?PNT=nn t niai')nm I ValuationAndLevyRateHistory Page 1 of 1 SnohomishonuTia Government Information & Services County4l* Washington Valuation, Levy Rate, and Property Tax History Close Window Parcel Number 00513900100700 Property Value History Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. Tax Year 2006 Market Land $12,0001 Market Improvement $228,000 Market Total $240,000 Tax Year 2005 Market Land $12,000,1 Market Improvement $228,000 Market Total $240,000 Levy Rate History Levy Rates are general rates for this property's tax code area. Tax Year 2006 Levy Rate 10.05288393672 Tax Year 2005 Levy Rate 10.90068723388 Property Tax History The amounts displayed are ad valorem taxes billed. The tax amounts shown should not be used for IRS tax purposes as they do not include any Surface Water Management fees, State Forest Fire Patrol fees, payments, or value or tax changes that may have occurred after the original bills were mailed. LID charges if any, are not included. For answers to questions about Property Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as new window) Tax Year 2006 Property Tax $2,412.69 Tax Year 2005 1 Property Tax $2,616.17 Close Window httn-//weh.5.co.snohomi sh.wa.us/DroDsys/Asr-Tr-ProDIna/ProDInfo08-Va1TaxHistorv.asi)?... 10/9/2007 R, Page 1 of 1 SnohoM ishonline Government Information & Services County4* Washington Structure Information Close Window General Description Parcel Number 00513900100700 Icotl Structure Class Commercial Structure Use Storage Building Structure Type MEADOWDALE MARINE BOAT STG Year Built 1920 Features Roof Cover Shingle Units 0 Floor Area Floor 1 Base SF 11,200 Sprinkler SF 11,200 Heated SF 11,200 Air Cond SF 0 Garage(s) & Carport(s) None Photo not yet available Close Window httn://web5.co.Snohomish.wa.us/DroDsys/Asr-Tr-PronIna/ProDInfo05-StructData. asD?Darce... 10/9/2007 �r Page 1 of 1 Snoho-M Im h Online Covernment Information & Services CountY40 Washington Structure Information Close Window General Description Parcel Number 00513900100700 (CO2) Structure Class Commercial Structure Use Storage Building Structure Type Year Built 1976 Features Roof Cover Metal Units 0 Floor Area Floor 1 Base SF 21,500 Sprinkler SF 21,500 Heated SF 21,500 Air Cond SF 0 Garage(s) & Carport(s) None Photo not yet available Close Window http://web5.co. snohomish.wa.us/propsys/Asr-Tr-PropInglProi)lnfoO5-StructData.asn?Darce... 10/9/2007 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124-3755 REPLY TO JAN 18 @ ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch Meadowdale Marina Mr. Vladan Milosavljevic, General Manager 23423 Brier Road Brier, Washington 98036 Reference: 200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC. Gentlemen: Enclosed is a Department of the Army permit which authorizes performance of the work described in your referenced application. You are cautioned that any change in the location or plans of the work will require submittal of a revised plan to this office for approval prior to accomplishment. Deviation from approved plans may result in imposition of criminal or civil penalties. Your attention is drawn to General Condition 1 of the permit which specifies the expiration date for completion of the work. You are requested to notify this office of the date the work is completed. We are interested in your thoughts and opinions concerning your experience with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District's Regulatory Program. Please complete a Customer Service Survey form. The form is available on our website at: http://per2.nwp.usace.army.mil/survey htni . At your request, we will mail you a paper copy that you may complete and return to us by mail or fax. Sincerely, Michelle Walker Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosure r f DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee: Meadowdale Marina, LLC. 23423 Brier Road Brier, Washington 98036 Permit No: 200500779 Issuing Office: Seattle District NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: Replace 277 timber piles with 230 steel piles (varying in diameter from 18 inches to 24 inches) and 10 ACZA timber fender piles. The piles will be extracted and cut below the mudline and disposed of upland at an approved disposal site. Approximately 27,000 lineal feet of creosote treated pile caps and 45,000 square feet of timber decking will be removed and disposed of on uplands. Piles will be installed with a vibratory pile driver, if possible. If an impact hammer is needed, sound attenuation measures will be employed. A 4-foot wide grated walkway will be constructed on the south side of an existing approach trestle. To provide additional sunlight under the approach trestle, steel grating will be placed in the center of the structure. The grating will be 4 feet wide and extend the full length of the trestle. In addition, the new pedestrian walkway that will be attached to the replacement trestle will be constructed of 4-foot wide light permeable grating. The grating at both locations will have a minimum of 60% openings. A stormwater collection and treatment system will be incorporated into the replacement pier system. This system will collect runoff from over -water parking areas on the replacement pier and convey the runoff to an oil -water treatment system. The treated runoff will then be discharged into Puget Sound. The proposal will be done in accordance with the plans and drawings dated June 14, 2005, attached hereto which are incorporated in and made a part of this permit (To repair and upgrade an existing pier and provide safe pedestrian access). Project Location: In Puget Sound near Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington. Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on JAN 18 2010. If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least 1 month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification to this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC. 200500779 and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for.your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it contains such conditions. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. 7. After a detailed and careful review of all the conditions contained in this permit, the permittee acknowledges that, although said conditions were required by the Corps, nonetheless the permittee agreed to those conditions voluntarily to facilitate issuance of the permit; the permittee will comply fully with all the terms of all the permit conditions. Special Conditions: a. You must provide a copy of the permit transmittal letter, the permit form, and drawings to all contractors performing any of the authorized work. b. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. C. You must implement the ESA requirements and/or agreements set forth in the Biological Evaluation, Proposed Repairs, Meadowdale Pier, Edmonds, Washington, dated June 17, 2005, in their entirety. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurred with a finding of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect' base on this document on January 9, 2006 (USFWS Reference 1-3-06-1-0663). The National Marine Fisheries Service concurred with a finding of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect' based on this document on June 5, 2006 (NMFS Reference 2005/05128). d. In order to protect Chinook salmon, bull trout, pacific herring, the permittee may conduct the authorized activities from July 16 through February 15 in any year this permit is valid. The permittee shall not conduct work authorized by this permit from February. 16 through July 15 in any year this permit is valid. Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities. You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: (X) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). 200500779 MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC. () Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). () Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.0 1413). 2. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorization required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. C. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. . 3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. C. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data. The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (See 4 above). C. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC. 200500779 appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you. fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this nPrmit. fQ 1 SOW Zcc)4- (DATE) This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below. Michael McCormick Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer VLD� (DATE) When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. (TRANSFEREE) rd (DATE) PIECE i-VEU STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office e 3190 160th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 September 7, 2006 REGISTERED MAIL RB 670 437 871 US Meadowdale Marina, LLC Attn: Vladan Milosavljevic, General Manager 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 9803.6 RE: Water Quality Certification Order #3388 and Coastal Zone Management Consistency Determination for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Reference #200500779 to Repair and Upgrade an Existing Pier, Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington Dear Mr. Milosavljevic: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a public notice for an individual Section 404 and Section 10 Permit on October 20, 2005, for the proposed Meadowdale Marina Pier Repair/Upgrade project. On December 7, 2005, Meadowdale Marina, LLC, submitted a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) to the Department of Ecology (Ecology) for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification (401 Certification) under the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) for the proposed project. The project proposes to replace approximately 277 timber piles with 230 steel piles, replace approximately 27,000 lineal feet of creosote -treated pile caps with concrete caps, replace approximately 10 creosote -treated fender piles with 10 ACZA timber fender piles, replace 45,000 square feet of timber decking with concrete decking, construct a 4- foot wide grated walkway along the approach trestle, and incorporate a stormwater runoff collection and treatment system into the replacement pier system. On behalf of the State of Washington, through the enclosed Order, Ecology certifies that the work described in the JARPA and the October 20, 2005, public notice complies with applicable provisions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and applicable state laws. This certification is subject to the conditions contained in the enclosed Order. On October 25, 2005, Meadowdale Marina, LLC, submitted a Certification of Consistency with the Washington State Coastal Zone Management Program (CZMP). On April 21; 2006, Ecology and Meadowdale Marina, LLC, jointly requested a CZM extension from the Corps. Pursuant to Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended, Ecology concurs with Meadowdale Marina, LLC's determination that the proposed work is consistent with Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 2006 Page 2 Washington's CZMP. This concurrence is based upon Meadowdale Marina, LLC's compliance with all applicable enforceable policies of the CZMP, including Section 401 of the CWA. This letter also serves as. the State response to the Corps of Engineers' October 20, 2006, Public Notice. If you have any questions, please contact Rebekah Padgett at (425) 649-7129. The enclosed Order may be appealed by following the procedures described in the Order. Sincerely, Geoff Tallent Northwest Regional Office Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program GT:rrp:cja Enclosure cc: Susan Glenn, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Laura Arbek, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chad Unland, Washington Department of Natural Resources e-cc: Penny Keys — HQ Loree' Randall — HQ 1\ 1 1, 1_ 1 V I_ v IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING A WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION TO Meadowdale Marina, LLC in accordance with 33 U.S.C. 1341 (FWPCA § 401), RCW 90.48.120, RCW 90.48.260 and Chapter 173-201A WAC TO: Meadowdale Marina, LLC Attn: Vladan Milosavljevic 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 R[6ULAIORy ORDER #3388 Corps Reference No. 200500779 Meadowdale Marina pier upgrade/repair, Puget Sound, located in Snohomish County, Washington. On December 7, 2005, Meadowdale Marina, LLC, submitted a Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) to the Department of Ecology (Ecology) requesting a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. A public notice was distributed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for the above -referenced project on October 20, 2005. The proposed project entails: replacing approximately 277 timber piles with 230 steel piles, replacing approximately 27,000 lineal feet of creosote -treated pile caps with concrete caps, replacing approximately 10 creosote -treated fender piles with 10 ACZA timber fender piles, replace 45,000 square feet of timber decking with concrete decking, constructing a 4-foot wide grated walkway along the approach trestle; and incorporating a stormwater runoff collection and treatment system into the replacement pier system. The project is located at 16111 76th Place West, Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, Section 5, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, WRIA #8. AUTHORITIES:%(L In exercising authority under 33 U.S.C. § 1341, 16 U.S.C. § 1456, RCW 90.48.120, and RCW 90.48.260, Ecology has examined this application pursuant to the following: L. Conformance. with applicable water quality -based, technology -based, and toxic or pretreatment effluent limitations as provided under 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, and 1317 (FWPCA §§ 301, 303, 306 and 307); 2. Conformance with the state water quality standards contained in Chapter. 173-201A WAC and authorized by 33 U.S.C. § 1313 and by Chapter 90.48 RCW, and with other applicable state laws; and Conformance with the provision of using all known, available and reasonable methods to prevent and control pollution of state waters as required by RCW 90.48.010. ao 1� SsnWNT.ssrc � S31 1 � •-497 S r I10 70 1 ''�. • Y ' 67bis 1174 � 39 I19 1 79 y. f S. A. .. 90 . . *9 .63 t 43 K RG4 a— ys 31 t i \ i. 1 39 Si S i\X /, rY7s lrwa a 100 06 0 9 6 51 ;tC S ;+ 7fiS µ .0 51 S1 '7'I <JV 129, 4 i 11. / ! r Im 1 6 60 77 S/ T9 a 06 1Z 102 1 91 t9 ° ! . 129 . ye ! „mo ow 3e ®19 lot 20 its 1� IW 1 k 13 / / 101 1 11 29 15 23 0 6 1IV / 110 �S `C bass► 115 I,PI�6T SOUND07 as 103 1a u 10 + SS. e3 barM 24 1 IIN C in s9 29 eo 1 1 92 42 9e74 risk 9s 44 tA n¢1 f-OPROJEbj-,1SITE 50 12104 01 &1 V/00 . 1 -41 » 2+ SOSn O =1 101 ra 1 95 1!, 62 ;p+' ZIB of)112 fl i 1r Y y a 19 •1L. hFVy i 9f y / 1 O i•'' • 7s >o �• u u � 1 9e z °S t I 23 91 53 1e3 97 Iq1 '9 9d- hAie,y 1 01 90 \ w S7 1 Z1 92 79 \ \ \ ,,8 1 1 7]t 6e1 1D,1 I h:leon vs°Y—nit 93 \ a� 90' CV, f3[•j' 31 b5 1mc r.•�r.n nT� SY 1 t 1 I 35 SAf 101 � 0� 0 1 \53 ^1 w t05 I �,11�r4bno�1. a 99 1 1 1 1 1 a2 ` 103 IL! I s i 1 . 1r11w COW 43 50 1 M •• 16 S2 106 O :1 1993 1 hMlark'a1. • I 1 d1 i 99 n � A L1•'a Bath I.3e C a. 01 „�ti ti"•.nEtw.o.la ROfire lN•Y „ tw Barr re.elR �R aaa 1iu wane r. aovrx9awla.n SOURCE: NOM CHART NO. 18441 VICINITY MAP NAUTICAL MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 YARDS 1000 0 5000 F PROJECT LOCATION: LAT = 47*51'10" LONG = 122.20'Ofi" PURPOSE: REPAIR EXISTING PIER DATUM: MLLW=0.00' PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, . LI-C SHEET: 1 OF 8 DATE: 06/14/200; titi•L 263S 00-1^l el 1� SsnWNT.ssrc � S31 1 � •-497 S r I10 70 1 ''�. • Y ' 67bis 1174 � 39 I19 1 79 y. f S. A. .. 90 . . *9 .63 t 43 K RG4 a— ys 31 t i \ i. 1 39 Si S i\X /, rY7s lrwa a 100 06 0 9 6 51 ;tC S ;+ 7fiS µ .0 51 S1 '7'I <JV 129, 4 i 11. / ! r Im 1 6 60 77 S/ T9 a 06 1Z 102 1 91 t9 ° ! . 129 . ye ! „mo ow 3e ®19 lot 20 its 1� IW 1 k 13 / / 101 1 11 29 15 23 0 6 1IV / 110 �S `C bass► 115 I,PI�6T SOUND07 as 103 1a u 10 + SS. e3 barM 24 1 IIN C in s9 29 eo 1 1 92 42 9e74 risk 9s 44 tA n¢1 f-OPROJEbj-,1SITE 50 12104 01 &1 V/00 . 1 -41 » 2+ SOSn O =1 101 ra 1 95 1!, 62 ;p+' ZIB of)112 fl i 1r Y y a 19 •1L. hFVy i 9f y / 1 O i•'' • 7s >o �• u u � 1 9e z °S t I 23 91 53 1e3 97 Iq1 '9 9d- hAie,y 1 01 90 \ w S7 1 Z1 92 79 \ \ \ ,,8 1 1 7]t 6e1 1D,1 I h:leon vs°Y—nit 93 \ a� 90' CV, f3[•j' 31 b5 1mc r.•�r.n nT� SY 1 t 1 I 35 SAf 101 � 0� 0 1 \53 ^1 w t05 I �,11�r4bno�1. a 99 1 1 1 1 1 a2 ` 103 IL! I s i 1 . 1r11w COW 43 50 1 M •• 16 S2 106 O :1 1993 1 hMlark'a1. • I 1 d1 i 99 n � A L1•'a Bath I.3e C a. 01 „�ti ti"•.nEtw.o.la ROfire lN•Y „ tw Barr re.elR �R aaa 1iu wane r. aovrx9awla.n SOURCE: NOM CHART NO. 18441 VICINITY MAP NAUTICAL MILES 1 0 1 2 3 4 YARDS 1000 0 5000 F PROJECT LOCATION: LAT = 47*51'10" LONG = 122.20'Ofi" PURPOSE: REPAIR EXISTING PIER DATUM: MLLW=0.00' PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, . LI-C SHEET: 1 OF 8 DATE: 06/14/200; titi•L 263S 00-1^l el APPROX. OHWM= MHHW=10.91'-- \ o rn �w'_ is �3tv EX TIMBER PILES, PILE CAPS � STRINGERS AND DECKING TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH cr ORMER FISHING CONCRETE/STEEL PILES, CONCRETE PILE CAPS AND CONCRETE DECKING.29' PLATFORM -NOT TO BE REPLACED 3g0, ,,S89' 4 q EX HOLDING TANK 80' \PLATFO N LLW-0.00' (TO BER REMOVED) EX FISHING PLATFORM TO r f r f o + } BE REMOVED e �; o ", y p '' .�j O i s a r� t6 h i f EX CREOSOTE TREATED TIMBER o , , EX TIMBER BUILDING PILES, TYP 5.-.ni » , ti a 4 y< t f - s TO REPAIRED) I 40 EX TIMBER FENDERLu PILES, TYP N �� N , a L EX�80ATLIFT TO r.{i. ct ti ,T '>1 W a QBE R€MOVED \\ 1 u j qCE QF E)( MBEf� VIHhRF ` EX STEEL PIPE � - PILE, TYP b \ \ Q 0 EX BOAT LIFT b a L5 EX STEEL BLD ;.s=3'35'37' Q PLATFORMS R CONCRETE D �_ _ - RADIUS=5116.88 Lu \ - L4 (REPAIR AS NEEDE _PT%R PILLES, fo LENGTH=321.05 L2 8, f. 250' ~ :• 227.7 B �a L1 �s89' 49 06 W CK THE REMOVABLE STAGING FLOATS USED FOR TEMPORARY BOAT MOORAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING BOATUFTS ARE NOT SHOWN. * OHWM-ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK FACE OF CONC. I DECK AND STEEL) BUILDING ABOVE LINE NO. L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 BEARING ISTANCE N23'40'23* i 30.41' N33'S1 56 W 30.41' N34'43'07'W 27.47' N27'S5'44'W 27.47' N20'35'05'W 25.58' EXISTING SITE PLAN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS: 40' 1Q R08ERT COLE & JERI MERRITT (2)CITY OF EDMONDS O' 80, 3Q BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY N a 0 a W EX TIMBER APPROACH TRESTLE (TO BE REPLACED) Z O EX RIPRAP EMBANKMENT I FGFND: - EX TIMBER PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE STEEL CONSTRUCTION. - EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED ® - EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN NOTE: LOCATION OF EXISTING CONC. AND STEEL PILES BASED UPON ORIGINAL DESIGN DRAWINGS - NOT FIELD VERIFIED PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 2 OF 8 DATE: 06/14/2005 REV: 07/05/05 1; 80' Ek:,nM :;FENDER 4' 5 ;, s• FORMER FISHING PLATFORM -NOT TO BE REPLACED APPROX. *OHWM=MHHW=10.91' e -.EX TIMBER PILES, PILE CAPS STRINGERS AND. DECKING TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH q CONCRETE/STEEL PILES, CONCRETE PILE CAPS / 1` AND CONCRETE DECKING. 40 390.2i ' I �49 0� EX HOLDING TANK �MLLW= 00' PLATFORM 2�2'± I I (TO BEmREMOVED)� )� I i 1D i _ Lr •j� 4 �7 f. E TEEL PIPE -EX PLUMB PILE, TYP CONC. PILES _ _ EX BOA - IFT EX STEEL BLDG EX CONC. BATTI PLATFORM OVER-�QONCRETE DECK PILES, TYP (REPAIR\AS NEEDtD) (Af PROACH TRESTLQI L11 I X TIMBER BUILDING I W I (T\REPAIRED) J I b RADIUS=5118.88 d LENGTH=321.05 �.Q I 250'f FACE OF CONC. 58g• qg 06� Vsl. DECK AND STEEL �\ 6�p�3 BUILDING ABOVE �s 6 G PILE PLAN EA[ 11 0' 60, 30' IFS • - EX CREOSOTE TREATED TIMBER _ EX TIMBER PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE PILE (APPROX. LOCATION) AND STEEL CONSTRUCTION. • - EX PLUMB CONC. PILES - - EX CONC. OCT. BATTER PILES 2H:12V DIRECTION OF BATTER, TYP _ EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED - EX CONC. OCT. BATTER PILES 4H:12V EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND ® • - EX STEEL PIPE PILE DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN. EX ROCK RIPRAP EMBANKMENT I *OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SEE SHEETS 5 AND 6 FOR SECTION A -A do B-B PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 3 OF 8 DATE: 06/14/2005 �{-L� 2,6r, cc- GI � Jr EX APPROACH TRESTLE TO BE 1 REPLACED WITH CONCRETE & EX PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE & STEEL 3so Z? \ 1 STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Ag'0F ' PROPOSED VERTICA`L APPROX. I ' GUARDRAIL \ *OHWM=M �HW=10.91' Muw=o. M � 10• >� t" RO OSED GUARD- o ROPOSED LIGHT 1 RAILI G TYP \ PERMEABLE GR NG I I PROPOSED COtJC PIER..{ - ALL EXISTING CREOSOTE -TREATED TIMB �'� FENDER PALES TYP ' PILES UNDER PIER & APPROACH TRESTLE TO B Q REMOVED AND REPLACED THLij STEEL & CONCRETE PILES. I 3 EX TIMBER RADIUS=5118.88 BUILDING (70 LENGTH=321.05 I �r c { P i' rlt r is r REPAIRED) ' O RELOCATE EXISTING 5 BUILDING TO NORTH AS L11 at i ` ° °• r j� CE F,� `, NEED TO REPLACE PILES, r • t 7 ;' TIMBE�\WHARF ter. T DECK, ETC. UNDER BUILDING . r a r ,r,,, v Iry u u a u,•u, , r. r i. r ,. ALL EXISTING CONCRETE AND I STEEL PILES UNDER THIS \ EX STEEL BLDG OVE _ BUILDING 70 REMAIN (REPAIR to CONC. DECK w ANY DAMAGE TO PILES AND (RER AS NtEDEDj - CAPS IN PLACE AS NEEDEp) 250't T6 a 22�• NS FACE OF CONC. DEC 49 p6�N o �0. AND STEEL BUILDING ol� \s \ '• *OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SEE SHEETS 7 AND 8 0 PROPOSED PILE PLAN & REPAIRS FOR SECTION C-C & D-D I FrFNB: • - PLUMB CONC. OR STEEL PILES -- CONC. OR STEEL BATTER PILES 2H:1V DIRECTION OF BATTER, TYP •- CONC. OR STEEL BATTER PILES 4H,.12V • - EX STEEL PIPE PILE •- REPLACEMENT FENDER PILE (ACZA TREATED TIMBER) 0' 60' nn 30' EX TIMBER PIER TO BE REPLACED WITH CONCRETE AND STEEL CONSTRUCTION. - EX BUILDING TO REPAIRED ® - EX CONCRETE AND STEEL PIER AND DRY STACK BUILDING TO REMAIN. PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 4 OF 8 DATE: 06/14/200: EX TIMBER DECK APPROX. DECK PLANKS, TYP EX TIMBER STRINGER, TYP EL=17.5't -EX CREOSOTE -TREATED TIMBER PILE CAP OHWM=MHHW � MHHW=10.91' _ MHW=10.06' EX CREOSOTE -TREATED TIMBER PILES, TYP (PILE SPACING VARIES 10' TO 16') �z MLLW=0.0' r-EX GRADE II II NOTE: EXISTING GUARDRAILS NOT SHOWN SECTION A -A EXISTING PIER CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL 2.5' 0' 5' OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK I PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 5 OF 8 DATE: 06 14 2005 'f,� ` 2 EX TIMBER STRINGER, TYP 10' DRIVING LANE -EX TIMBER DECK PLANKS, TYP 10' DRIVING LANE GUARDRAIL, TYP EX CREOSOTE -TREATED PILE CAP p M� 0.91' _ p MHW=10.06' _ *OHWM=MHHW GRADE II II EX CREOSOTE -TREATED TIMBER PILES, TYP (PILE III I� SPACING VARIES 7' TO 8'f) *OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION B-B EXISTING TYPICAL APPROACH TRESTLE CONSTRUCTION 2.5' 0' 5' PROPOSED REPAIRS TO EXISTING PIER IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 6 OF 8 DATE: 06 14 2005 Gnu 2 (%-s 01 PROPOSED PRESTRESSED PRE -CAST CONC. DECK PANELS, TYP PROPOSED CAST -IN- PLACE CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB APPROX. DECK EL=17.5'f PROPOSED CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. PILE CAP _p MHHW=10.91' MHW=10.06' *OHWM=MHHW PROPOSED STEEL OR PRECAST CONCRETE PILES (PILE SPACING VARIES 16' TO 20') . _ . �z MLLW=0.0' GRADE - I i l l l-1 I I-1 I I=1 I► II II II II II II II 11 NOTE: PROPOSED GUARDRAILS NOT SHOWN *OHWM=ORIDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION C-C PROPOSED TYPICAL REPLACEMENT PROPOSED REPAIRS TO PIER CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PIER 2 5' IN: PUGET SOUND AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS 0' 5' COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC SHEET: 7 OF 8 DATE: 06 14 2005 PROPOSED PROPOSE( GUARDRAIL PEDEDESTRI WALKWAY 4' PROPOSED LIGHT PERMEABLE / GRATING - PROPOSED STEEL SUPPORT BEAMS FOR WALKWAY- .-PROPOSED LIGHT 10' DRIVING LANE 10' DRIVING LANE -PROPOSED VERTICAL GUARDRAIL 8' 4' 8' -EL. 17.5'f PROPOSED LIGHT PERMEABLE GRATING 5,± I It 1 9' PROPOSED CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. TOPPING SLAB, TYP g'JCONC. 1'f PROPOSED PRESTRESSDECK PANEEX -PROPOSED VEHICLE GUARDRAIL, TYP ,-PROPOSED CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. PILE CAP *OHWM=MHHW HW=10.91' MHW=10.06' PROPOSED STEEL OR PRECAST CONCRETE PILE, TYP � I - 1 i-1 I I -I 1 1-IM I-1 I I-1 � I-� � 22 I 1 I "=III=11 ICI III=11 I —III 1 12 i I i i 1 12 Ij jI II II �I 11 1 OHWM=ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK SECTION D-D _ PROPOSED REPLACEMENT PROPOSED REPAIRS TO APPROACH TRESTLE EXISTING PIER 2.5' IN: PUGET SOUND o' S' AT: MEADOWDALE, EDMONDS COUNTY: SNOHOMISH STATE: WASHINGTON APPL. BY: MEADOWDALE MARINA, .LLC SHEET: 8 OF 8 DATE: 06 14 2005 Rk 7 605 cu-11 9 Order #> >88, Corps Reference #200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 20.06 Page 3 of 12 A7. Copies of this Order shall be kept on the job site and readily available for reference by Ecology personnel, the construction superintendent, construction managers and lead workers, and state and local govermnent inspectors. A8. The Applicant shall provide access to the project site and all mitigation sites upon request by Ecology personnel for site inspections, monitoring, necessary data collection, and/or to ensure that conditions of this Order are being met. A9. Nothing in this Order waives Ecology's authority to issue additional orders if Ecology determines that further actions. are necessary to implement the water quality laws of the state. Further, Ecology retains continuing jurisdiction to make modifications hereto through supplemental order, if additional impacts due to project construction or operation are identified (e.g., violations of water quality standards, downstream erosion, etc.), or if additional conditions are necessary to further protect water quality. A10. The Applicant shall ensure that all appropriate project engineers and contractors at the project site have read and understand relevant conditions of this Order and all permits, approvals, and documents referenced in this Order. The Applicant shall provide Ecology a signed statement (see Attachment A for an example) from each project engineer and contractor that they have read and understand the conditions of this Order and the above - referenced permits, plans, documents and approvals. These statements shall be provided to Ecology before construction begins at the project or mitigation sites. Al 1. This Order does not authorize direct, indirect, permanent, or temporary impacts to waters of the. state or related aquatic resources, except as specifically provided for in conditions of this Order. Al2. Any person who fails to comply with any provision of this Order shall be liable for a penalty of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation for each day of continuing noncompliance. B. In -Water Construction Water Quality Conditions: B1. Water quality criteria contained in WAC 173-201A-030(1) and WAC 173-201A-040 shall apply to this project, unless otherwise authorized by Ecology. This Order does not authorize temporary ekceedances of water quality standards beyond the limits established in WAC 173-201A-110(3). B2. In -Water Construction Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring: Prior to the commencement of any construction, the Applicant shall submit to Ecology for its review and written approval a Water Quality Monitoring Plan. "In -water construction" is defined as all work below the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Puget Sound and Orde: )88, Corps Reference 9200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 2006 Page 5 of 12 Project Manager, by telephone at (425) 649-7129 or (425) 649-7000, or by fax to (425) 649-7098. The Applicant shall, at a minimum, provide Ecology with the following information: A description of the nature and cause of non-compliance, including the quantity and quality of any unauthorized discharges; ii. The period of non-compliance, including exact dates, duration, and times and/or the anticipated time when the Applicant will return to compliance; and iii. The steps taken, or to be taken, to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the non-compliance. iv. In addition, within five (5) days after notification of an exceedance, the Applicant shall submit a written report to Ecology that describes the nature of the violation, corrective action taken and/or planned, steps to be taken to prevent a recurrence, results of any samples taken, photographs, and any other pertinent information. B3. Project activities shall be conducted to minimize siltation of the beach area and bed. C. Project Mitigation Conditions for Waters of the State: Cl. The Applicant shall avoid eelgrass beds during construction. Placement of derrick anchors (or spuds) in areas designated as eelgrass beds is prohibited. Eelgrass beds shall not be shaded for more than three (3) consecutive days during peak growing times (i.e., May through August). C2. Prior to initiating construction activities, a qualified consultant shall mark the edge of the eelgrass habitat with temporary buoys within the barge work corridors. C3. The Applicant shall minimize the number of barge trips into the shoreline area in order to prevent propeller scour and impacts to eelgrass, kelp, and benthic habitat. C4. In areas with kelp, eelgrass, or macroalgae populations, vessel operation shall be restricted to tidal elevations adequate to prevent grounding of the barge. C5. If kelp, eelgrass, or macroalgae beds are present, vessel operation shall be restricted to tidal elevations adequate to prevent propeller -related damage to vegetation. Orde id8, Corps Reference 9200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 2006 Page 7 of 12 D5. Wash water containing oils, grease, or other hazardous materials resulting from wash down of equipment or working areas shall be contained for proper disposal, and shall not be discharged into state waters or storm drains. D6. ' Clean Fill Criteria: Applicant shall ensure that fill (clean sand) placed for the proposed project does not contain toxic materials in toxic amounts. Work in Marine Waters: D7. During construction, a containment boom and absorbent pads shall be placed around the perimeter of the work area to capture wood debris and other materials released into the waters as a result of construction activities. All accumulated debris shall be collected and disposed of upland at an approved disposal site.. D8. Petroleum spill containment materials shall be deployed in the water surrounding active work barges at all times. D9. Only barges with low walls or other containment device around the perimeter of the barge shall be used for storage of dewatering discharges and excavated sediments in order to prevent and minimize sediments and turbid waters from entering marine water. D 10. During construction the Applicant shall have a boat available on site at all times to retrieve debris from the water. D l l . The Applicant shall use tarps or other containment method when cutting or drilling over water to prevent sawdust and other materials from entering the water. D12. All manmade debris that has been deposited on the beach within the construction work area shall be removed and disposed of upland such that it does not enter waters of the state. Abandoned concrete pipes, miscellaneous concrete slabs, and angular rocks in the construction work corridor that have washed into intertidal areas shall be removed from the beach. D 13. If cast in place, wet concrete/grout shall be prevented from entering waters of the state. Forms for any concrete/grout structure shall be constructed 'to prevent leaching of wet concrete/grout. Impervious materials shall be placed over any exposed concrete/grout not lined with the forms that will come in contact with state waters. Forms and impervious materials shall remain in place until the concrete/grout is cured. Orde .,d8, Corps Reference #200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 2006 Page 9 of 12 E3. Construction shall not begin until sediment sampling results have been reviewed and analyzed by Ecology. Ecology may require additional measures for project construction based on the results of this sediment sampling. E4. Sampling Data Submittal — Sediments a. Sediment sampling data for all required fields listed in the current version of SEDQUAL (Sediment Quality Information System) shall be submitted to Ecology electronically in SEDQUAL data entry templates including, but not limited to REFERENCE, SURVEY, STATION, SAMPLE, CHEMISTRY, BIOASSAY and BIOASSAY CONTROL.. The current version of SEDQUAL can be found at http://www.ecy.,wa.gov/programs/tep/smu/sedqualfirst.htm. b. Station locations shall include latitude/longitude coordinates in NAD83 HARN south zone feet and chemical concentration data shall be reported in dry weight units. c. Electronic SEDQUAL template data must be verified to be compatible with the current version of SEDQUAL which uses ASCII protocol, comma delimited text files prior to delivery tQ Ecology. Verification shall be conducted by the consultant importing each of the data templates into their SEDQUAL database, correcting any errors, and then exporting the corrected final templates for delivery to Ecology. d. Sediment sampling data shall also be submitted to Ecology in hardcopy reports . containing data tables in both dry weight and total organic carbon normalized units in comparison to applicable state regulatory criteria. Electronic SEDQUAL template data shall be submitted to Ecology simultaneously with the hardcopy report. F. Emergency/Contingency Measures F1. The Applicant shall develop and implement a Spill Prevention and Containment Plan for all aspects of this project. This Plan shall be submitted to Ecology for review 30 days prior to beginning construction. F2. The Applicant shall have adequate and appropriate spill response materials on hand to respond to emergency release of petroleum products or any other material into waters of the state. F3. Fuel hoses, oil drums, oil or fuel transfer valves and fittings, etc., shall be checked regularly for drips or leaks, and shall be maintained and stored properly to prevent spills into state waters. F Order #.) )88, Corps Reference #200500779 Meadowdale Marina, LLC September 7, 2006 Page 11 of 12 I. Appeal Process You have the right to appeal this Order to the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Pursuant to chapter 43.21B RCW, your appeal must be filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board, and served on the Department of Ecology within thirty (30) days of the date of your receipt of this document. To appeal this Order, your notice of appeal must contain a copy of the Ecology Order you are appealing. Your appeal must be filed with: The Pollution Control Hearings Board 4224 - 6th Avenue. SE, Rowe Six, Bldg. 2 P.O. Box 40903 Lacey, Washington 98504-0903 Your appeal must also be served on: The Department of Ecology Appeals Coordinator P.O. Box 47608 Olympia, Washington 98504-7608. In addition, please send a copy of your appeal to: Federal Permit Appeals Coordinator .Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 For additional information: Environmental Hearings Office Website: h.ttp:llwww.eho.wa.gov Your appeal alone will not stay the effectiveness of this Order. Stay requests must be submitted in accordance with RCW 43.21B.320. These procedures are consistent with Ch. 43.21B RCW. Dated . September 7, 2006 at Bellevue, Washington. Geoff Tallent,. Section Manager Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Department of Ecology State of Washington ERRS OF US Army Corps CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE of Engineers ,w. WITH DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Seattle District Permit Number: 200500779 Name of Permittee: Meadowdale Marina Date of Issuance: JAId 18 2007 Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit, please check the applicable boxes below, sign this certification, and return it to the following address: Department of the Army U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, Regulatory Branch Post Office Box 3755 Seattle, Washington 98125-3755 Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of your authorization, your project is subject to suspension, modification, or revocation. The work authorized by the above -referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. The mitigation required (not including monitoring) by the above -referenced ❑ permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Signature of Permittee Washington �DRAULIC PROJECT APPROVE Department of FISH and RCW 77.55.021 -Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW WILDLIFE Issue Date: January 26, 2006 Control Number: Project Expiration Date: December 31, 2008 FPA/Public Notice #: North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard Mill Creek, WA 98012-1296 (425) 775-1311 103687-1 N/A PERMITTEE 11 AUTHORIZED AGENT OR CONTRACTOR Meadowdale Marina, LLC ATTENTION: Vladan Milosavljevic 23423 Brier Rd Brier, WA 98036 206-353-6456 Layton & Sell, Inc. ATTENTION: Jeffrey Layton 12515 Willows Rd NE, Suite 205 Kirkland, WA 98034 425-825-1735 Fax: 425-825-1363 Project Name: Pier Upgrades Project Description: Replace timber pier with concrete, replace creosote pilings with concrete, steel, and ACZA pilings PROVISIONS 1. TIMING LIMITATIONS: The project may begin immediately and shall be completed by December 31, 2008, provided, a. Work below the ordinary high water line shall not occur from February 16 through July 15 of any year for the protection of migrating juvenile salmonids. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The permittee or contractor shall notify the Area Habitat Biologist (AHB) listed below by phone, fax (425)379-2323, or email (prayelmp@dfw.wa.gov) of the project start date. Notification shall be received by the AHB prior to the start of construction activities. 3. Work shall be accomplished per the revised plans and specifications approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife entitled Proposed Repairs to Existing Pier and dated January 19, 2006, except as modified by this Hydraulic Project Approvai. A copy of these plans shall be available on site during construction. 4. All manmade debris on the beach shall be removed and disposed of upland such that it does not enter waters of the state. 5. This approval is for repair/replacement of the existing structure only and shall not result in expansion of the structure. 6. As illustrated in the application, the 2 fishing platforms shall be removed and not replaced. . PIER CONSTRUCTION AND PILE DRIVING 7. During creosote -piling removal, containment booms and absorbent sausage booms (or other oil - absorbent fabric) shall be placed around the perimeter of the work area to capture wood debris, oil, and other materials released into marine waters as a result of construction activities. All Page 1 of 6 Washington I DRAULIC PROJECT APPROVA North Puget Sound _ Department of 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard FISH and RCW 77.55.021 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Mill Creek, WA 98012-1296 WILDLIFE (425) 775-1311 Issue Date: January 26, 2006 Control Number: 103687-1 Project Expiration Date: December 31, 2008 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A weeks at a constant temperature that meets, or exceeds 60 degrees F. If the ambient temperature is less than 60 degrees F, then ACZA treated wood must undergo the Post Treatment Kiln Drying, noted above; d. In -Retort Ammonia Removal Plus Plant Holding Time (MPHT), as conditioned in previous section (c), but held under cover, for a minimum of 1-week, at a constant temperature that meets, or exceeds 60 degrees F. e. All ACZA wood treatment methods shall be verified by providing a signed and dated certification from a third party. 20. Wet concrete/grout shall be prevented from entering waters of the state. Forms for any concrete/grout structure shall be constructed to prevent leaching of wet concrete/grout. Impervious materials shall be placed over any exposed concrete/grout not lined with the forms that will come in contact with state waters. Forms and impervious materials shall remain in place until the concrete/grout is cured. 21. Beach area depressions created during project activities shall be reshaped to preproject beach level upon project completion. HABITAT PROVISIONS 22. If kelp, eelgrass, or macroalgae beds are present, vessel operation shall be restricted to tidal elevations adequate to prevent propeller related damage to vegetation. 23. Eelgrass and kelp shall not be adversely impacted due to any project activities (e.g., barge shall not ground, equipment shall not operate, and other project activities shall not occur in eelgrass and kelp). 24. All natural habitat features on the beach larger than 12 inches in diameter, including trees, stumps, logs, and large rocks, shall be retained on the beach following construction. These habitat features may be moved during construction if necessary. WATER QUALITY PROVISIONS 25. Project activities shall be conducted to minimize siltation of the beach area and bed. '26. If at any time, as a result of project activities, fish are observed in distress, a fish kill occurs, or water quality problems develop (including equipment leaks or spills), immediate notification shall be made to the Washington Department of Ecology at 1-800-258-5990, and to the Area Habitat Biologist listed below. 27. All debris or deleterious material resulting from construction shall be removed from the beach area and bed and prevented from entering waters of the state. Page 3 of 6 Jf Washington h 3RAULIC PROJECT APPROVA North Puget Sound Department of 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard FISH and RCW 77.55.021 - Appeal pursuant to Chapter 34.05 RCW Mill Creek, WA 98012-1296 WILDLIFE (425) 775-1311 Issue Date: January 26, 2006 Control Number: 103687-1 Project Expiration Date: December 31, 2008 FPA/Public Notice #: N/A Failure to comply with the provisions of this Hydraulic Project Approval could result in a civil penalty of up to one hundred dollars per day and/or a gross misdemeanor charge, possibly punishable by fine and/or imprisonment. All Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization projects)or 77.55.141 are subject to additional restrictions, conditions or revocation if the Department of Fish and Wildlife determines that new biological or physical information indicates the need for such action. The person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued has the right pursuant to Chapter 34.04 RCW to appeal such decisions. All agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization Hydraulic Project Approvals issued pursuant to RCW 77.55.021 may be modified by the Department of Fish and Wildlife due to changed conditions after consultation with the person(s) to whom this Hydraulic Project Approval is issued: PROVIDED HOWEVER, that such modifications shall be subject to appeal to the Hydraulic Appeals Board established in RCW 77.55.301. APPEALS INFORMATION IF YOU WISH TO APPEAL THE ISSUANCE OR DENIAL OF, OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN A HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVAL, THERE ARE INFORMAL AND FORMAL APPEAL PROCESSES AVAILABLE. A. INFORMAL APPEALS (WAC 220-110-340) OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021, 77.55.141, 77.55.181, and 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request an informal review of: (A)The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; or (B)An order imposing civil penalties. A request for an INFORMAL REVIEW shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 and shall be RECEIVED by the Department within 30-days of the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval or receipt of an order imposing civil penalties. If agreed to by the aggrieved party, and the aggrieved party is the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, resolution of the concerns will be facilitated through discussions with the Area Habitat Biologist and his/her supervisor. If resolution is not reached, or the aggrieved party is not the Hydraulic Project Approval applicant, the Habitat Environmental Services Division Manager or his/her designee shall conduct a review and recommend a decision to the Director or his/her designee. If you are not satisfied with the results of this informal appeal, a formal appeal may be filed. B. FORMAL APPEALS (WAC 220-110-350) OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021 (EXCEPT agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization projects)OR 77.55.291: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the following Department actions may request a formal review of: (A) The denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval; (B) An order imposing civil penalties; or (C) Any other'agency action' for which an adjudicative proceeding is required under the Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 34.05 RCW. A request for a FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Department of Fish and Wildlife HPA Appeals Coordinator, shall be plainly labeled as'REQUEST FOR FORMAL APPEAL' and shall be RECEIVED DURING OFFICE HOURS by the Department at 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, Washington 98501-1091, within 30-days of the Department action that is being challenged. The time period for requesting a formal appeal is suspended during consideration of a timely informal appeal. If there has been an informal appeal, the deadline for requesting a formal appeal shall be within 30-days of the date of the Department's written decision in response to the informal appeal. C. FORMAL APPEALS OF DEPARTMENT ACTIONS TAKEN PURSUANT TO RCW 77.55.021(ag)(agricultural irrigation, stock watering or bank stabilization only), 77.55.141, 77.55.181, or 77.55.241: A person who is aggrieved or adversely affected by the denial or issuance of a Hydraulic Project Approval, or the conditions or provisions made part of a Hydraulic Project Approval may request a formal appeal. The request for FORMAL APPEAL shall be in WRITING to the Hydraulic Appeals Board per WAC 259-04 at Environmental Hearings Office, 4224 Sixth Avenue SE, Building Two - Rowe Six, Lacey, Washington 98504; telephone 360/459-6327. Page 5 of 6 La on Lr..l 1#11n Sell coastal and civil engineering Jeffrey A. Layton, P.E. John D. Sell, P.E. Jeffrey l Becker, P.E. Gwendolyn M. McHugh, P.E. January 26, 2006 Ref. No. 420-01 Ms. Rebekah R. Padgett Federal Permit Coordinator Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Northwest Regional Office Department of Ecology 3190 1601h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 RE: Meadowdale Marina, LLC — Proposed Repairs Possession Sound, City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, WA Corps Reference No. 200500779 Dear Rebekah: Please find enclosed a shoreline permit decision from the City of Edmonds regarding the above referenced project. We expect that the HPA for the project will be issued in the near future. I will send you a copy when I receive it. Sincerely yours, LAYTON & SELL, INC., P.S. J y res dent Enclosure: as notes cc: Mr. Vladan Milosavljevic, General Manager, Meadowdale Marina LLC Layton & Sell, Inc., P.S. ♦ 12515 Willows Road NE ♦ Suite 205 ♦ Kirkland, WA 98034 ♦ (425) 825-1735 ♦ FAX: (425) 825-1363 Page 1 of 1 Jeff Layton From: Jeff Layton (jell@layton-sell.com] �( Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:43 PM \,J` To: Laura Praye Subject: Meadowdale Marina Laura, Per your email of 1/20/2006, 1 have provided below two alternative grating specifications for the Meadowdale Marina that will meet the 60% open area requirement. During the final design of the project, the owner would need to select one of the alternatives. Alternative 1: Manufacturer: McNichols Grating Type: Heavy Welded Bar Grating, Type GHB (Galvanized) Bearing Bar Size: 3/8" thickness by 4" deep Bearing Bar Spacing (center to center): 1-3/16" Cross Bar Spacing: (center to center): 4" Open Area: 62% Alternative 2: Manufacturer: McNichols Grating Type: Heavy Welded Bar Grating, Type GHB-2 (Galvanized) Bearing Bar Size: 1/4" thickness by 4" deep Bearing Bar Spacing (center to center): 1-3/16" Cross Bar Spacing: (center to center): 2" Open Area: 65% I have provided below a link to the bar grating data at McNichols: http://www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heayywelded/productDetails.html#loadtables Please let me know if you need additional information on the grating. Jeffrey A. Layton, P.E. Layton & Sell, Inc., P.S. 12515 Willows Road NE, Suite 205 Kirkland, WA 98034 425-825-1735 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 2of9 "Expanded Center to center cross bar spacing is the distance from the L±J"Structural Shapes center of one cross bar to the center of next cross bar. see Stair Treads the spacing table for more information on the GHB, HWC, HUD & HWE Series cross bar spacing "Stair Tread Covers ❑*"Ladder Rungs E'•Handrail Components 0-Trench Drain El"Accessories --Fabrication Services Construction Cutting Heavy Weld Bar Grating is constructed by the joining of ' welding the bearing bars and cross bars at all of their intersections by either a resistance or conventional hand Cutouts weld. " Print Takeoffs The bearing bars run parallel to the length or span of a Metal Finishes standard grating panel and are responsible for the Stair Treads product's load bearing capabilities. The cross bars, which ` run parallel to the width of the span, are primarily "Product Applications responsible for holding the bearing bars together. However, they also play a factor in deflection characteristics, especially for concentrated loads which are not.distributed across the span of the grating. Surface Welded bar grating is available with the following surfaces: Smooth - Standard surface. Serrated - Serrations are cut into the grating's bearing bars surface • Mebac - Grit is bonded to the grating surface. Mebac surfaces provide slip resistance and are available by special order. ............ ........ . ` . Center to Center Cross Barr Spacing f. r ...........,t......... •T . x ♦ top Bearing Bars • top Width Length or Span Load Tables Quantity Cut Type and Stubs Clips and Fasteners Open Space Open Area Tolerances httD://www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heavywelded/productDetaiIs.htm1 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 1 of S • cN I-CHOLSO.sinco 1952 1.877-884-4653 ► Home - Products - Grating - Bar - Heavy Welded EI- P rod u cts 1�1" Perforated i "Grating EF]" Plank 8-Bar Castable " Buttonhole Surface Expanded Surface Perforated Surface Locked by Swaging " Electroforged B-All Types Hand Welded Heavy Welded Close Mesh Riveted Mat and Pit Press Locked O+"Swage Locked 0-Expanded PuItruded Molded 0._ Flooring 0'_ Wire Mesh Bar Grating - Heavy Welded: Product Details Request a quote from the stock list. If an item is not in stock, use the quote form. The following details explain the specifications required to request a quote. Material Selection - Some materials are special order only. Plain Steel Painted Black Galvanized Aluminum Stainless Steel top Center to Center Bearing Bar Spacing Center to center bearing bar spacing is the of distance from the center of one bearing bar to the center of the next bearing bar. See the spacing diagram for more information on the GHB, HWC, HWD & HWE series center to center bearing bar spacing. Center to Center Bearing Bar Spacing ► top Center to Center Cross Bar Spacing Sez LIVE A&s.ISTA UNAVAI LABI Resources Quote Form Load Tables Conversion Calculato Product Details All Product Details Material Selection Center to Center Bearing Bar Spacing Center to Center Cross Bar Spacing Construction Surface Banding Bearing Bar Height Bearing Bar Thicknes Span Clear Span Loading Information Traffic Type http://www.mcnichols.com/products/gratinq/bar/heavywelded/`productDetaiIs.htm1 1/24/2006 FICINJI(-AUL5 - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 3 of 9 ♦ top Banding Bar grating panels, pieces, or trench grating can be banded to provide. strength and to provide a finished look. Banding is the welding of a rectangular metal bar to the ends of the bearing bars. Two banding types are available, based on the placement of the welds. • Load Banding - The metal bar is welded at every bearing bar. Load banding is commonly used in trench grating applications where high loading requirements exist (i.e. motorized wheel traffic). Note: Aluminum products are not load banded. • Trim Banding - The metal bar is welded only at every 4th to 6th bearing bar. Trim banding is commonly used for pedestrian traffic applications where loading is not a factor. Banding Trench Grating ♦ top Bearing Bar Height The bearing bar height, also known as bearing bar depth, is measured from the bottom of the bearing bar to the top. See the appropriate GHB, HWC, HWD or HWE Series load table for the available bearing bar heights. 00000000ccen= ♦ top Bearing Bar Thickness The bearing bar thickness, also known as bearing bar width, is the measurement of distance between the left surface of the bearing bar to the right surface of the httiD://www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heavywelded/productDetails.html 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating Heavy Welded Page.4 of 9 same bearing bar. The standard rectangular bearing bar thickness for Heavy Weld Bar Grating is 1/4 inch. A larger bearing bar thickness of 5/16 inch, 3/8 inch, or 1/2 inch is available by special order. Span The span of the grating is the length of the grating between grating supports. In order to perform in accordance with its design loading characteristics, grating must be installed so that the bearing bars are parallel to the span. This is necessary because bearing bars are the primary elements which support the load applied to the grating. Clear Span Clear span is the length of unsupported grating. Grating supports typically have a foot or ledge on which the grating rests. The part of the grating resting on the support is not part of the clear span. For example, if a 36-inch long piece of grating rests on two supports, each with a 3-inch ledge, the clear span would be 36 inches minus the part of the grating resting on the ledge (which is a total of 6 inches). In this example, the clear span would be 30 inches. -�; ,A r_ Thickness ♦ top 11 -4 +r;: �J L V ♦ top ♦ top http://www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heavywelded/productDetai Is. htmI 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 5 of 9 Loading Information When selecting a specific bar grating, it is important to know how much the grating will deflect (i.e. bend) under load. Deflection is determined by consulting a load table. Click for more information on load tables. Types of load Grating applications are subject to two common load types: Uniform and Concentrated. Uniform Load Uniform load is applied equally to the full width and span of the grating . It is measured in pounds per square foot. Concentrated Load Concentrated load is applied to the full width of the grating at mid -span and is not equally distributed across full length of the span. Concentrated load is measured in pounds per foot. Grating in some applications may be subjected to a concentrated load over only a portion of its width. This is called a partial load. The deflection in a partial load is determined by the stiffness of both the bearing bars and the cross bars, and varies with the type of grating used. To determine carrying capacity of gratings subject to partial loads, click on live help, email us at internet.sales@mcnichols.com or call McNICHOLS (1-800-237- 3820). A top Traffic Type If you don't know the bearing bar height and thickness you require, the appropriate grating size can be determined from the load the grating is expected to carry. The following information is required. What type of traffic will the grating support? If only people are supported, specify pedestrian. If wheel traffic is to be supported, choose between "on-" or "off -road" vehicles. On -road vehicles include trucks, cars or any other vehicles that could be registered and licensed. If the vehicle would not typically be registered, a construction vehicle or forklift, for example, then specify "off -road." For Wheel Traffic Only If the traffic includes off -road vehicles, then it is necessary to know: Weight or capacity of the vehicle in pounds Wheel diameter in inches http://www.mcnicho Is. corn/prod ucts/grating/bar/heavywelded/productDetaiIs. htm1 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products- Bar Grating. - Heavy Welded Page 6 of 9 Width of wheel in inches The tire type, either solid or pneumatic (air filled) ♦ top Width The standard panel width is 2 feet or 3 feet. The width of f cut -to -size pieces are a function of bearing bar spacing— HWD H'JVE, for see width tables GHB, HWC, or exact cut- to -size widths. �-+—Width—r. ♦ top Length or Span The standard panel length is 20 feet. Other panel lengths are available by special order. Panels may also be cut -to -size. •••�•• i Length The bearing bars run the length of the panel and this Len g is also the direction of the grating span that provides or Span optimum loading capacity. Please consult the appropriate load table for application requirements. ♦ top Load Tables Heavy Welded Load Tables - Plain & Stainless Steel GHB & GHB-2 HWC & HWC-2 HWD & HWD-2 HWE & HWE-2 ♦ top httD://wvvw.mcnichoIs.COM/DroduUS/aratinq/bar/heavvw?Ided/productDetaiIs.html 1/24/2006 MCNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 7 of 9 Quantity Quantity is the number of bar grating pieces you will need. McNICHOLS will quote you on the exact quantity you specify and inform you if minimum quantities apply. ♦ top Cut Type and Stubs Bar Grating can be cut three ways to produce three different types of stubs: random, uniform, or equal stub. The cutting costs vary according to the material, number of cuts, and type of cut. Random cut This is the most cost effective cut and is standard. When two equally -sized, .randomly -cut pieces are placed side -by -side, the cross bars may not line up. The measurements for equal pieces will be the same; however, the distance from the bearing bar ends (stubs) to the cross bars will vary from piece to piece and end to end. Uniform cut When two equally -sized, uniformly -cut pieces are placed side - by -side, the cross bars will line up, but may not be centered. The measurements for equal pieces are the same; however, the distance from the bearing bar ends (stubs) to the cross bars will not be the same on both ends but will be uniform from piece to piece. Equal Stubs When two equally -sized pieces with equal cut stubs are placed side -by -side, the cross bars will line up and will be centered. The measurements for equal pieces are the same and the distance from the bearing bar ends (stubs) to the cross bars will also be the same on both ends. Clips and Fasteners ♦ top Fasteners or clips may not be required. If you do need fasteners Saddle or G style clips can be used to secure most Heavy Weld bar grating. Specify which type you want and ht1-n•//XnrXnnni mrnirhnl-,.rnm/nrcducts/aratina/bar/heavvwelded/productDetails.html 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 8 of 9 McNICHOLS will quote the specific clip size appropriate for your grating. Where easy removal is not critical, Heavy Weld grating can be secured by welding. ♦ top Open Space Open space is the clear spacing between the bearing bars. It is also the difference between the bearing bar thickness and bearing bar center to center spacing. For example, open space for GHB bar grating with a 1/4 bearing bar thickness is 15/16 inch (1-3/16 inch bearing bar centers - 1/4 inch bearing bar thickness = 15/16 inch open space). The table to .the right lists the Heavy Weld bar grating open space. Heavy Weld Open Space Series BB Thickness Open Space 3/8 inch 13/16 inch GHB and GHB-2 5/16 inch 7/8 inch . 1/4 inch 15/16 inch 3/8 inch 1 inch HWC and HWC-2 5/16 inch 1-1/16 inches 1/4 inch 1-1/8 inches 3/8 inch 1-1/2 inches HWD and HWD-2 5/16 inch 1-9/16 inches 1/4 inch 1-5/8 inches 3/8 inch 2 inches HWE and HWE-2 5/16 inch 2-1/16 inches 1/4 inch 2-1/8 inches A top Open Area Open area is the total area of the space between the cross and bearing bars divided by the total area of the bar grating panel and is expressed as a percent. The larger the open area, the higher the percentage of light, air, or fluid that can pass through the grating. Heavy Weld Open Area htto: //www.mcnichols.com/products/gratinq/bar/heavywelded/productDetaiIs.htmI 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 9 of 9 BB Thickness 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1/4 3/8 1A 016 Open Area 62% 72% 56% 65% 66% 75% 60% 68% 73% 79% 67% 72% 77% 82% 71% -7r-oi There are standard tolerances for shearing (cutting) heavy weld grating products. If you do not specify'a tolerance, the standard tolerance applies. Tolerances can be specified on the quote form. More information on tolerances. I Contact Us I McNICHOLS in a Minute® MrNT('Wnl C rn GII RinhhC RaCPrvP(l htto://www.mcnichols.com/products/qratinq/bar/heavywelded/productDetails.html 1/24/2006 Page 1of1 Jeff Layton From: Jeff Layton [Jeff@layton-sell.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:52 PM To: Laura Praye Subject: Meadowdale Marina - Another Link O Laura, Here is another link to McNichols regarding the proposed grating: http://www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heavvweIded/ Jeffrey A. Layton, P.E. Layton & Sell, Inc., P.S. 12515 Willows Road NE, Suite 205 Kirkland, WA 98034 425-825-1735 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 1 of 3 Mc■'M ICHOLS0sinco 1952 1-877-884-4653 ► Home - Products - Grating - Bar o•. P rod u cts O•• Perforated B" Grating $•• Plank 0' Bar Castable i- Buttonhole Surface Expanded Surface Perforated Surface ?'-Locked by Swaging Electroforged i All Types - Hand Welded Heavy Welded Close Mesh Riveted Mat and Pit Press Locked ❑+"Swage Locked (]•• Expanded 0•• Pultruded �• Molded D Flooring Wire Mesh Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Heavy Weld Bar Grating is typically used for heavy duty rolling traffic applications, such as bridge floors, highways, airport runways, or high load trench applications. Request a Quote Use the quote form to request a quote. Product Information The combination of heavy -weight bearing bars and twisted steel cross bars provide excellent grating stability and loading capabilities. The cross bars are welded or electro- forged to the rectangular shaped bearing bars by a process that combines intense hydraulic pressure with a powerful electric current. Stainless steel mill finishes may not be suitable for all applications. Sandblasting is available by special order. Bearing Bars Heavy Weld Series McNICHOLS` Heavy Weld bar grating products are divided into eight series: GHB, GHB-2, HWC, HWC-2, HWD, HWD-2, HWE & HWE-2. Each series has specific bearing and cross bar spacing, bearing bar sizes, weights, load characteristics, fastener requirements, etc. SeE 'LIVE ASSIS-TA UNAVAJLABI Resources Quote Form Load Tables Conversion Calculato Product Details All Product Details Material Selection Center to Center Bearing Bar Spacing Center to Center Cross Bar Spacing Construction . Surface Banding Bearing Bar Height Bearing Bar Thicknes Span Clear Span Loading Information Traffic Type httn-//www.mcnichols.com/products/gratinq/bar/heavywelded/ 1/24/2006 McNICHOLS - Products - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 2 of 3 ❑+"Expanded 'Structural Shapes "Stair Treads "Stair Tread Covers Ladder Rungs R. Handrail Components EF)"Trench Drain 0" Accessories 4** Fabrication Services Cutting Welding Cutouts Print Takeoffs Metal Finishes Stair Treads Product Applications Links to Heavy Weld bar grating series information are provided below: GHB, GHB-2, HWC, HWC-2, HWD, HWD-2, HWE & HWE-2 Series All Heavy Welded Series GHB 4n 1.3116" Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table HWC-2 2rr: 2" : Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table Center to Center Bar Spacing Diagram/Characteristics Fasteners Construction & Spacing Table For All Bar Grating GHB-2 HWC 2re: 2111 H41.3116" ........... Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table f` NWE '1;71V1 Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table 411 •��f vrr• Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table HWD-2 2rr : 2n Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table Width Length or Span Load Tables Quantity Cut Type and Stubs Clips and Fasteners Open Space Open Area Tolerances http://www.mcnichoIs.com/products/gratinq/bar/heavywelded/ 1/24/2006 IvICINE— UL5 - Nroaucts - Bar Grating - Heavy Welded Page 3 of 3 HWE An 2-318" Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table HWE-2 : 7 n A- Length and Width Plain Steel Load Table Plain & Stainless Steel Weights Cross-reference Table Note: see Welded for lighter duty grating. For closer bearing bar spacing, see Wheels 'n Heels@ Site Tour I Contact Us I MCNICHOLS in a Minute@ © 2006 Copyright McNICHOLS Co. All Rights Reserved hi-tn-//www.mcnichols.com/products/grating/bar/heavywelded/ 1/24/2006 h k f 'I 1 r; 0 N a t t 1 CD O v' ] n i� yy 1 O, coN O f�M i + { ,., r� ,�� rl�Y. Jyrr�11• ` N O � \� \� � � � � � � \ I a p � {y f i k 7 •. + 4 Y is x..4 i F- r,m 'I A �OOZI90101 - i / • <LOA tO�OI ri J �. e •! � Y '^� 1. �«�vy �� pE ,� � µ_ J ; —` W_�� �— -n �e'l LDQLA80�0b ^� V, LOOZI9010C-, Li •�ir5 ,_ a LA � it '��-`_ `'� - •��,;. �.�-��,- _' _ �• ti s, a :....n -. 7`• ��•> . t� �;'.•;.. a Ott'• . Wesffall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:13 PM To: 'dhudson@snocom.org' Cc: Westfall, John; Correira, Mark; Smith, Mike; Battalion Chiefs Subject: SNOCOM Premise History - Meadowdale Marina 1 /26/06 Hi David, Please enter into Premise History. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Allison, Steve Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 5:04 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: SNOCOM Premise History.doc SNOCOM Premise History.doc (29... Chief, Attached is a Premise History warning for Meadowdale Marina and due to the tactical plan, upgrades the minimum response to a split response and includes Battalion 16. 1 have not sent this in. Thanks for the consideration. SA i SNOCOM PREMISE HISTORY DATA ENTRY FORM 1) XX New Entry: (WARNING) or HISTORY or ALARM (circle one) _ Change/Correct Existing Entry _ Delete Existing Entry 2) Address: Meadowdale Marina, previously know as Laebugten Wharf or Haines Wharf 16111-76th Ave West Edmonds, WA 3) Subject's Name: N/A 4) Sex: N/A Date of Birth: N/A 5) Physicals: N/A 6) Weapon: N/A 7) Inside Phone Number: N/A 8) Associated Vehicle(s): N/A 9) Comments/Reason for Request: Meadowdale Marina is in a state of disrepair and continuing deterioration. Edmonds Fire has a standing Standard Operating Procedure in the event of an emergency incident at Meadowdale Marina. Edmonds Fire Department and Mutual Aid units shall follow Edmonds SOP 102.18, the Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan. Because of objectives contained within the Tactical Plan, the minimum response to an incident at Meadowdale Marina shall be a split response and include Battalion 16. Such incidents include Smoke Investigations, Sprinkler Waterflow Alarms, Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies. 10) Purge Date: Do not purge. Send annual validation to BC Allison (Note: all entries will require annual validation by originating department) Officer/Official Requesting Entry: BC Allison Date: January 25, 2006 Supervisor Authorization: Thomas J. Tomberg, Fire Chief Date: January 26, 2006 • This form must be completed for any Premise Warning, History or Alarm entry request. • You may mail this form to SNOCOM, 6204 215th St SW, Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 • You may fax this form to SNOCOM at 425-775-3977 • If you have questions call SNOCOM at 425-774-3583 SNOCOM USE ONLY ******************** U: FireAdmin: Forms: SNOCOM Premise History Entered by: Reviewed by: Purged/Returned by: Date: Date: Date: SNOCOM Premise History Data Entry Form Instructions This form is intended to be utilized to notify SNOCOM of any additions, corrections, or deletions to the premise information file. It must be filled out completely. Instructions for its use follow: 1) The premise information will be displayed to the dispatcher as entered. Hazard and weapon involvement should be indicated as a warning. All others should be indicated as a history. The ALARM category is for "NO RESPONSE" to police alarms only in accordance with applicable city ordinances. If this is a change or correction, explain on line 9. Use the delete entry to request an entry to cancelled prior to the purge date already on file. 2) Fill in the complete address including business name, apartment number, building name, etc. A complete address is required for entry. Cross streets, intersections or hundred -block address are NOT sufficient for entry. 3 — 5) Self-explanatory. 6) Known or suspected weapons, carried or location kept. If more room is needed continue on line 9. -- 7) Telephone number into the premise, if known. 8) Associated vehicle(s); including, Color, Year, Make, Body style, License, and License state. 9) Additional and/or specific information that the dispatcher needs to know. Additional and/or specific information that the dispatcher needs to disseminate to the responding units. 10) The date the information will no longer be needed and should be removed from the Premise Information File. Forms will be returned when purged. Premise information can be reentered by submitting a new request. All entries will require annual validation by the originating department. Forms must be signed and dated by officers or officials as designated by their department. System space limitations may require SNOCOM personnel to edit entries. If you have any questions call the on -duty dispatch supervisor. U:FireAdmin:Forms:SNOCOM Premise History V Westfall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:52 PM To: Battalion Chiefs Cc: Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike 'Subject: Meadowdale Marina 1 /18/06 A couple weeks ago Mike and John advised us about the sagging AS line at MM and that the pier had a Stop Work Order on it. They recommended a review of SOP 102.18 Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan. We talked about MM and SOP 102.18 at the Expanded Staff Meeting again on January 17. Last night, Council upheld the Hearing Officer's decision to forbid the owner from moving buildings over to other places on the pier while the poles and deck and replaced, and then move the buildings back. The owner has few options now regarding this structure which continues to deteriorate. If you and your crews have not reviewed SOP 102.18 and visited MM recently, I want you to so now. Thanks. TT Message Page 1 of 1 Westfall, John From: Smith, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:00 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Cc: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina - The Fire Department will require as builts for the damaged and repaired sprinkler piping. Permits will be required for repairing the fire line and the damaged portion of the sprinkler system. This can be lumped together in one permit. Prior to occupancy we will need: 1) Verification that the fire line to the building is repaired, on and functional. 2) Annual certifications from a licensed sprinkler contractor on both the dry and wet automatic sprinkler systems that they are functional. 3) Work must be done by a licensed sprinkler contractor regarding repairs to the wet system on the piping that broke when a portion of the building and pier collapsed. 4) The sprinkler system requires monitoring off site. I am sure other things will come up. I will advise if we add or delete to the above requirements. -----Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:45 AM To: Smith, Mike Cc: DST Subject: Meadowdale Marina Mike -- — Besides a scope of work and bid --what schematics/details, etc. will you want for the Meadowdale Marina fire sprinkler repair work? Thanks JLG itIv%les' W a4w#VG 04 I foyWOANSb Co. IM A 16L Irs Co C" Tdv" 4• 61 1 064hn CAM+ 2-- rZae- Xa o & 0 Z TfµP Fs x Fvc VAit SPR t. Deck IL"Vtc.; WaTf^-! J. C-LA NMA'L M#*(7" % 11/18/2005 Westfall, John From: Smith, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 12:13 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina The Fire Sprinkler System for the buildings on the pier are disabled because part of fire line has separated due to dock collapse. Pumping into the FDC if a fire occurs on the pier would be of no value other than training. The City will be posting the structure to Stop Work and fix and restore the Fire Sprinkler/Fire Line System. Now would be a good time to review our SOP 102.18 on responses and actions to calls at Meadowdale Marina. FYI APPLICATION ROUTING FORM AND CHECKLIST ROUTED TO: Engineering 7/22/05 Fire' = 7/22/05' PW 7/22/05 Parks & Rec. 7/22/05 Building 7/22/05 Community Svcs 7/22/05 FILE : SM-05-94 FROM: PLANNING nD EC P c 1:, RETURNED HI JUL 2 2 2005 i EngineeringFIRE DEPT. Fire 2 /Pi Public Works Parks & Rec. Building Community Svcs Staff Comments: 0fvt C—L,J 7v .VP12-q-� *PER WHAT SECTION OF THE CODE? *Additional Information Required for Complete Application • Owner/Applicant: MEADOWDALE MARINA, LLC • Property Address: 16111 76T" PI. W. • Date of Application: 07/20/05 • Type: Repair/replace existing pier • Meeting Required: Yes X No Date of Meeting • Planning Contact: Steve Bullock X Application. X Fee X APO List EUC Form 05-106 Critical Areas Determination X Vicinity Map . Petition X Geotechnical Study Criteria X Site Plan Site Plan/Floor Plan Legals (Existing A Proposed) Title Report Landscape Plan Elevations Traffic Impact Analysis Drainage Plan X SEPA Checklist June 20, 2005 Ref. No. 420-01 Mr. Stepehen F. Bullock, AICP Senior Planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Meadowdale Marina Dear Stepehen: Jeffrey A Layton, P.E. John D. Sell, P.E. Jeffrey T. Becker, P.E. PERMIT COUNTED; On behalf of my client, Meadowdale Marina LLC, this letter is to request a Shoreline Exemption for the repair of the Meadowdale Marina. Many of the existing timber piles that support, the pier have deteriorated from exposure to the elements, necessitating replacement. Also, various timber pile caps, stringers and decking materials that are supported by the timber piles have experienced considerable damage from weather and sea conditions. As a result, these materials also need to be replaced. In addition to the timber repairs, various concrete/steel piles and above -water structural members of the concrete portion of the existing pier will need to be repaired. 'The proposed repairs for the project are further described below. Proposed Project The proposed work will consist of the replacement of all existing creosote treated timber piles that support the timber portions of the marina's pier. The replacement piles will be constructed of steel and/or concrete. (Non -bearing existing timber fender piles will be replaced with ACZA-treated timber piles). In addition, all creosote -treated timber pile caps and stringers, and treated/untreated decking will be removed and replaced with steel and concrete materials. Creosote -treated timber materials removed from the project site will be disposed of at an approved upland disposal site. For the existing concrete portions of the marina, various steel and concrete piles will be repaired in place. Also, any concrete support beams and decks that exhibit damage will be repaired in place. The proposed replacement structure for the existing timber portion of the marina will be constructed in the same footprint as currently exists. Attachment A provides a detailed description of the project along with a set of conceptual design drawings that illustrate the proposed repairs. Layton & Sell, Inc., P.S. 0 12515 Willows Road NE 0 Suite 205 0 Kirkland, WA 98034 0 (425) 825-1735 0 FAX: (425) 825-1363 Stephen Bullock, AICP Page 2 June 20, 2005 Qualification for Shoreline Exemption We believe the proposed project qualifies for a Shoreline Exemption per WAC 173-27- 040 (2) (b), which is reproduced below: Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to shoreline resource or environment. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment; It is our understanding that the City of Edmonds adopted the above WAC citation under ECDC 23.10.045 (A) where the City adopted by reference the definition in WAC 173-27- 030 (7) for "Exempt' developments, which is reproduced below: "Exempt" developments are those set forth in WAC 173-27-040 and RCW 90.58.030 (3)(e), 90.58.140(9), 90.58.147, 90.58.355 and 90.58.515 which are not required to obtain a substantial development permit but which must otherwise comply with applicable provisions of the act and the local master program; Furthermore, RCW 90.58.030(3)(e) states: "The following shall not be considered substantial developments for the purpose of this chapter:" (i) "Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire, or elements. Based upon the above, we believe the City can issue an exemption for the proposed work. In particular, in the above -cited WAC 173-27-040 indicates that replacement of a structure may be authorized as a repair under certain conditions. We believe. the proposed project meets the conditions as set forth below: o Replacement of deteriorated timber structures with steel and concrete construction is the preferred method by state and federal agencies that regulate shoreline development in the Puget Sound region. As a result, the common method of repairing deteriorated or damaged timber structures is to completely replace them with steel and concrete construction. The replacement structure will match the footprint of the existing structure. The deck elevation of the replacement structure will match the deck elevation of the existing structure. Stephen Bullock, AICP Page 3 June 20, 2005 • The bulk appearance of the replacement structure will be compatible with the original structure and will also match the appearance of the existing concrete portions of the project site. • The replacement structure will result in no changes.to the local environment from existing conditions, other than the removal of creosote -treated timber materials, which will result in an improvement. In conclusion, please consider my client's request for a shoreline exemption for the proposed work. Feel free to call me (or Milo) if you have questions or need additional information on the project. LAYTON & SELL, INC., P.S. Enclosure: as noted cc: Vladan ("Milo") Milosavljevic, General Manager, Meadowdale Marina LLC Message Page 1 of 1 Westfall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:25 PM To: Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike; Battalion Chiefs Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina in Edmonds 1-31-07 FYI. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Haakenson, Gary Sent: Wednesday, January.'31, 2007 11:33 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina in Edmonds F� _ -- .-Original Message ----- From: Hansen, Roger [mailto:hansenr@soundtransit.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:19 PM To: Haakenson, Gary Cc: Hardy, Patrice; Vogt, Don Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina in Edmonds Mayor Haakenson, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Sound Transit has not acquired the Meadowdale Marina site. While it is still under consideration as a possible mitigation site, other sites are being explored and we are not currently engaged in acquisition discussions with the owner of the Meadowdale Marina. Sincerely, Roger Hansen Beal Property Manager Sound Transit 20.6-689-3366 From: Haakenson, Gary [mailto:Haakenson@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:59 PM To: Hansen, Roger Subject: Meadowdale Marina in Edmonds Hi Roger, can you confirm for me that Sound Transit has purchased the above mentioned marina in Edmonds. My understanding is that you will be demolishing it as mitigation for part of the double tracking project through Edmonds. If this is so, can you give me an estimated time for demolition? From the city's perspective, the sooner for the better! Thanks, Mayor Gary Haakenson 1/31/2007 Iz,C. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org October 30, 2007 Meadowdale Marina LLC Mr. Vladan Milosavljevic, General Mgr 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings, 16111 76th Place West Dear Mr. Milosavljevic: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The City of Edmonds is sending this notice to you in your capacity as the owner of the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, on January 25, 2003 your marina building suffered a partial collapse, as an apparent result of which the on -site fire protection system became impaired. At that time Fire Marshal John Westfall agreed that the impaired sprinkler system could remain dormant until building repairs were complete as long as: 1) substantial reconstruction work was being conducted with an active building permit, and 2) no public or private activities other than actual repair work were being conducted at the marina. On September 21, 2007, the fire department responded to a structure fire at your marina. Using combined land and marine resources, the fire was extinguished at tremendous risk to the firefighters operating on your marina. Since 2003, we have been guided by specific local operating procedures in a separate tactical plan to.enable us to help protect your property. However, by your inaction to date you have failed to correct the dangerous condition of the marina structure. The marina poses a severe risk to fire personnel and other first responders in the event of a fire or other emergency. In light of the inherently dangerous condition of the marina structure, Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 (enclosed) stating that no firefighting personnel shall board or access your pier except, at the discretion of the incident commander and to the extent directly necessary to prevent an imminent threat to human life or safety. Pursuant to applicable safety regulations, including but not limited to Chapter 296-305 WAC, the extent to which fire personnel may ultimately be deployed to the pier will depend upon the incident commander's determination in balancing the severity of the life/safety threat with the risk to fire personnel. The Edmonds Police Department has adopted the Fire Department standard with respect to access to your marina and pier structures. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hakinan. Jannn A copy of the Fire Department directive is enclosed for your information. Please carefully review the directive, consult your legal counsel and insurance carrier as appropriate, and plan accordingly. This notice serves to warn you of the limits the fire and police departments can safely operate under for any attempts to protect your property. Please contact Fire Marshal Westfall at (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions. SincerpV, J A� L hnJ. stfall Fire Marshal Enclosure Al Compaan Police Chief Cc: City Attorney Zach Lell Building Official Jeannine Graf Mr. Stepanovic Slobodanka, Meadowdale Marina LLC EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT SOP 102.18 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2003 REVISED: OCTOBER 19, 2007 MEADOWDALE MARINA TACTICAL PLAN INTENT To establish emergency response procedures and resource support in the event of a fire or other emergency on the piers at Meadowdale Marina, Grid 507, 16111 - 76`h Place West. DISCUSSION Meadowdale Marina, previously known as Laebugten Wharf or Haines Wharf, is in a state of disrepair and continuing deterioration. It is dangerous because of recent neglect, the adjacent double tracks of the Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railway Company, its status as an attractive nuisance, and the public use of a private crossing to access the beach. Additionally, the water supply to the suppression system collapsed in 2006 and is no longer in service. The outside decking is very slippery and sections have deteriorated to a condition that creates a hazard to personnel (see attached pictures), although planking inside the structure is in relatively good shape. The newer section, a metal building with concrete deck, is in good shape. No portions of the structure will support the weight of emergency vehicles or apparatus. The owner's plans, and what the various regulatory agencies will allow, are not clear now or in the future. Until further notice, strategic and tactical plans for emergency response to Meadowdale Marina appear below. STAFFING AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Safety • Establish safety watches immediately on both north and south tracks with radios and lights (at night). • Request additional resources as required. Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies Handle all non -fire emergencies by following normal procedures with some exceptions: • All personnel must wear personal floatation devices (PFDs) while working on the pier. • At least one member shall be assigned with hand lights to illuminate the path leading to the emergency scene, and the incident scene itself, at night. • Focus apparatus and vehicle lights, and adjustable spotlights on access routes and the scene to provide additional illumination. Fire Response, Smoke Investigation • Personnel shall not access the pier unless a known life hazard is present. • Investigation of fire or smoke shall occur from the shore side using binoculars, and/or the water side using Marine 16 or other marine units. • Extinguishing pier fires shall be handled from the shore side using master streams Page 1 of 6 414 SOP 102.18 or an aerial Ladder elevated master stream and/or from the water side using Marine 16 handlines or master streams. TACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies No apparatus or vehicle will be driven onto the pier under any circumstance. Due to the uneven surface, a gurney will not easily traverse the pier to transfer a patient to an Aid or Medic Unit. For this reason, if not on the dispatch, request SNOCOM send an Engine Company or Ladder Company with a Stokes basket for staffing and equipment assistance. Fire Response and / or Smoke Investigation Small fires on the deck shall be extinguished from the land or water side using the reach of a handline or master streams. Confirmed Large Fire • No attack lines on pier. Arriving crews shall not stretch attack lines out onto the pier in an attempt to fight a large fire. All responding units shall standby on 751' Place until tactical assignments are given. • First -in. The first -in Engine shall respond down the driveway and set up a deck gun operation, and/or extend hand lines where necessary. • Marine 16. The closest available EFD Engine or Ladder Company shall respond to the Port and deploy Marine 16. Once underway, Marine 16 shall contact the Incident Commander and attempt to give an estimated time of arrival to the pier. Once on scene marine firefighting efforts will be coordinated with the Incident Commander. The Incident Command shall direct SNOCOM to request: 1. ESCA (425-776-3722), and that they notify the Department of Ecology. 2. Utility Package so PUD can cut power to the pier. 3. US Coast Guard (206-442-7070) to act in liaison and resource procurement role, but with no fire -fighting capability. 4. Kingston Marine 81 from North Kitsap Fire and Rescue #10 via Kitsap CenCom (360-308-5400). 5. Seattle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center (206-490-2965). Seattle will respond if available. 6. SNOCOM notify the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (1-800- 832-5452, 206-625-6362) of the fire and traffic in the Meadowdale Marina Crossing (MP 21.26). • Master Stream Operations. The first -in Engine takes its own supply using the fire hydrant at the base of the driveway. • Call Back Resources. Because the operation is staff intensive and requires many hours to mitigate, an Edmonds Engine is used in this evolution. The Incident Commander considers staffing the Reserve Engine with callback personnel. • Flying Embers. Depending on wind direction and thermal column produced, it may be necessary to use first alarm or additional resources to watch for and respond to flying embers landing on wood roofs, and in grasses and landscape throughout the area. Page 2 of 6 �. SOP 102.18 • Public Information. Burning embers and toxic smoke may drift into residential neighborhoods and pose additional challenges. Coordinate neighborhood contacts and public information with the Police Department. Hazardous Materials. Containment of a large fuel or oil spill in the water may require a hazardous materials response. There are approximately ten boats, one car (in the metal building), and one truck housed on the pier. Request a Hazmat Technician or Team response as required. If required, notify ESCA (425-776-3722) to secure a State Mission Number and initiate a call for resources to contain spills from the water side. Notify the US Coast Guard (206-442-7070) concerning fuel spills or hazards caused by floating debris as timbers and planks detach from the pier and enter Puget Sound. OWNER INFORMATION The owner's representative is Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic (206-353-6456). PRE -PLAN The Meadowdale Marina pre -plan, along with a check -off list of items the owner was required to mitigate or provide, is located under the large status board in the Battalion Chief vehicle. As with any tactical plan, this document serves as a guideline and may be modified by the first -in Company Officer or Incident Commander as required. Enclosed are the Meadowdale Marina Prefire Plan and a Tactical Plan Check -Off Sheet for a Large Fire. Thomas J. T mb rg Fire Chief Page 3 of 6 SOP 102.18 TACTICAL CHECK OFF SHEET FOR MEADOWDALE MARINA CONFIRMED FIRE ❑ Size -up; notify BNSF ❑ Establish Command, Locate Command Post ❑ Marine 16 is underway and, if needed, Kingston Marine 81 via Kitsap CenCom; request Seattle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center ❑ Request additional resources as required. Owner's representative is Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic at 206-353-6456 ❑ Notify Chief Officers/Fire Marshal ❑ Request Utility Package ❑ Request ESCA (Department of Ecology) and Coast Guard (no firefighting capability) ❑ Base all incoming units on 751" Place ❑ Position Engine at base of driveway, east of railroad tracks; take own supply with on -site hydrant, deploy deck gun and / or handlines ❑ Establish "Division or Group" to monitor flying embers in neighborhood ❑ Assign Engine for immediate ember control and stopping pier fires close to railroad tracks. Additional Engines and / or Ladders with master streams may be used for fire suppression and/or flying embers control ❑ Spill containment ❑ Debris containment in Puget Sound ❑ Public information Page 4 of 6 zl� 1 Page 6 of 6 SOP 102.18 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 =� FIRE DEPARTMENT 1 g')0 y; CITY OF EDMONDS ' 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 -r: FIRE DEPARTMENT Meadowdale Marina LLC Mr. Stepanovic Slobodanka 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Meadowdale Marina LLC Mr. Vladan Milosavljevic, General Mgr 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Tomberg, Thomas From: Sent: Compaan,-AI Monday [=October 29, 2007 6:11 PM To: Westfall John Cc: Tomberg, Thomas; Gannon, Gerald Subject: RE: Revised & PD-Mead"owdale Marina.doc- John, the letter looks just fine. Thanks for including us in it. -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:13 AM To: Compaan, Al Cc: Chief Tomberg Subject: FW: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc Al: Sorry for the shortfuse-I wish to get that letter out to Milo asap so he knows where we're at... John -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:25 PM To: Compaan, Al Subject: RE: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc Ok. -----Original Message ----- From: Compaan, Al Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:22 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc John, I am also having ACOP Gannon and Acting ACOP Smith review this. Will be back to you this afternoon. Thanks very much!! -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:13 PM To: Compaan, Al Cc: 'Zach Lell' Subject: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc 1 October 30, 2007 Meadowdale Marina LLC Mr. Vladan Milosavljevic, General Mgr 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings, 16111 76th Place West Dear Mr. Milosavljevic: The City of Edmonds is sending this notice to you in your capacity as the owner of the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, on January 25, 2003 your marina building suffered a partial collapse, as an apparent result of which the on -site fire protection system became impaired. At that time Fire Marshal John Westfall agreed that the impaired sprinkler system could remain dormant until building repairs were complete as long as: 1) substantial reconstruction work was being conducted with an active building permit, and 2) no public or private activities other than actual repair work were being conducted at the marina. On September 21, 2007, the fire department responded to a structure fire at your marina. Using combined land and marine resources, the fire was extinguished at tremendous risk to the firefighters operating on your marina. Since 2003, we have been guided by specific local operating procedures in. a separate tactical plan to enable us to help protect your property. However, by your inaction to date you have failed to correct the dangerous condition of the marina structure. The marina poses a severe risk to fire personnel and other first responders in the event of a fire or other emergency. In light of the inherently dangerous condition of the marina structure, Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 (enclosed) stating that no firefighting personnel shall board or access your pier except at the discretion of the incident commander and to the extent directly necessary to prevent an imminent threat to human life or safety. Pursuant to applicable safety regulations, including but not limited to Chapter 296-305 WAC, the extent to which fire personnel may ultimately be deployed to the pier will depend upon the incident commander's determination in balancing the severity of the life/safety threat with the risk to fire personnel. The Edmonds Police Department has adopted the Fire Department standard with respect to access to your marina and pier structures. A copy of the Fire Department directive is enclosed for your information. Please carefully review the directive, consult your legal counsel and insurance carrier as appropriate, and plan accordingly. This notice serves to warn you of the limits the fire and police departments can safely operate under for any attempts to protect your property. Please contact Fire Marshal Westfall at (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John J. Westfall Fire Marshal Enclosure AI Compaan Police Chief Cc: City Attorney Zach Lell Building Official Jeannine Graf Mr. Stepanovic Slobodanka, Meadowdale Marina LLC Tomberg, Thomas From: Westfall-John Sent: Friday, M% b r.- 26 72007 1{0:13 AM To: Compaan, AF� Cc: Chief Tomberg Subject: FW:, Revised &-.PD Meadowdale Marina.doc Revised & PD leadowdale Marina.. Al: Sorry for the shortfuse-I wish to get that letter out to Milo asap so he knows where we're at... John -----Or"iginal Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:25 PM To: Compaan, Al Subject: RE: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc Ok -----Original Message ----- From: Compaan, Al Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:22 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc John, I am also having ACOP Gannon and Acting ACOP Smith review this. Will be back to you this afternoon. Thanks very much!! -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:13 PM To: Compaan, Al Cc: 'Zack Lell' Subject: Revised & PD Meadowdale Marina.doc 1 • .. %.Message rage t of s Tomberg, Thomas To: Zach Lell _ Subject: RE:: eadowdaleMarina.doc%' 10-25-07- Hi Zach, Looks like John is in touch with Al and the appropriate signatures will be affixed. -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:32 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: compaan@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Hi, Tom: Thanks for your work on this. TT Scott and I support this approach. The attached notification letter has been revised to include both a reference to the Police Department's directive and a signature line for Chief Compaan. I've also added Mr. Milosavljevic as a courtesy copy recipient. Again, please verify the addressee and feel free to call or email me if you need anything else. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas [mailto:tomberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:12 AM To: Zach Lell Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Hi Zach, One more thing and then I will leave you alone. I gave a brief report on the Meadowdale situation at the Director's meeting this AM. Chief Al Compaan said that Edmonds Police have a similar policy to Fire's and offered it for inclusion in the letter if you and Scott thought it advisable. If so, please contact him at compaan_@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:43 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc You're very welcome, Tom. Please let me know if you need anything else from my end. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas [mailto:tomberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] 10/25/2007 Message Page 2 of 3 ,,. Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:35 AM To: Zach Lell Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Thanks Zach. I am sure Duane and Jeannine can confirm unless they already have and that name is correct. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:03 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark; Westfall, John Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Good Morning, Chief: I've revised the attached draft to reflect your second and third points below. With respect to the addressee, my own file materials are unclear regarding the identity of the marina's true owner, and I would need to defer to staff on this point. The permit applicant was Vladan Milosavljevic, but he is consistently referenced in the application documents and correspondence as the General Manager of Meadowdale Marina, LLC rather than the owner per se. I had assumed that John originally addressed the draft letter to Mr. Slobodanka because he was in fact the owner. Perhaps Duane and/or Jeannine can clarify this point. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas(ma iIto: tmberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:44 AM To: Zach Lell; Westfall, John Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W, Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Good morning, Looks good, with some thoughts: 1.1 assume the name in the "Dear' heading is the legal owner. We had heard it was Milo's sister. Just checking. 2. Assistant Chief Mark Correira actually issued Directive 2007-03 on September 21 on my instructions so you may want to rewordthe sentence in the fourth paragraph to say something like "In light of the inherently.....' Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 stating' "that no firefighting...." 3. Later in the fourth paragraph, consider rewording to read "A copy of the Fire Department Directive..." instead of "A copy of the Fire Chiefs directive..." Thanks. TT -----Original Message----- 10/25/2007 message Page 3 of 3 From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:24 PM To: Westfall, John Cc: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc John: Scott Snyder and I collaborated on this matter and our suggested changes to your draft letter are highlighted in the attached document. Please review the revised draft at your convenience and contact me with any additional questions or concerns. As the revised document indicates, a copy of the Fire Chiefs directive should be enclosed with the copy of the letter that is ultimately sent to Mr. Slobodanka. - Zach From: Westfall, John [mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:57 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; Zach Lell Subject: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Rough draft for comment. Please provide by 10/19. «MeadowdaleMarina.doc>> John 425 771-0213 10/25/2007 �- Message Page 1 of 1 Tomberg, Thomas From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, O.ctobe2'3„ 2Q,017 11.44 AM To: Westfall, John; Tomberg, Thomas; 'Zach Lell' Cc: Graf, Jeannine; 'W. Scott Snyder'; Correira, Mark; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMari_unadoc All: If I'm originating the letter, your comments should include me and I asked for input by the 19th. John -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 11:34 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas; 'Zach Lell' Cc: Graf, Jeannine; 'W. Scott Snyder'; Correira, Mark; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc All: Thanks for your input. Attached is final copy sending today. John 10/24/2007 Message Page 1 of 2 Tomberg, Thomas From: Zach Lell [zlell@omwiaw.comj Sent: Monday,aOctober22, 2007 9:43 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE:�M'e daleMari-ia-Aoc You're very welcome, Tom. Please let me know if you need anything else from my end. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas [mailto:tomberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:35 AM To: Zach Lell Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Thanks Zach. I am sure Duane and Jeannine can confirm unless they already have and that name is correct. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:03 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; .Correira, Mark; Westfall, John Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Good Morning, Chief: I've revised the attached draft to reflect your second and third points below. With respect to the addressee, my own file materials are unclear regarding the identity of the marina's true owner, and I would need to defer to staff on this point. The permit applicant was Vladan Milosavljevic, but he is consistently referenced in the application documents and correspondence as the General Manager of Meadowdale Marina, LLC rather than the owner per se. I had assumed that John originally addressed the draft letter to Mr. Slobodanka because he was in fact the owner. Perhaps Duane and/or Jeannine can clarify this point. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas [mailto:tomberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:44 AM To: Zach Lell; Westfall, John Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Good morning, Looks good, with some thoughts: 10/22/2007 Message Page 2 of 2 1. 1 assume the name in the "Dear" heading is the legal owner. We had heard it was Milo's sister. Just checking. 2. Assistant Chief Mark Correira actually issued Directive 2007-03 on September 21 on my instructions so you may want to reword the sentence in the fourth paragraph to say something like "In light of the inherently.....' Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 stating' "that no firefighting...." 3. Later in the fourth paragraph, consider rewording to read "A copy of the Fire Department Directive..." instead of "A copy of the Fire Chiefs directive..." Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:24 PM To: Westfall, John Cc: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc John: Scott Snyder and I collaborated on this matter and our suggested changes to your draft letter are highlighted in the attached document. Please review the revised draft at your convenience and contact me with any additional questions or concerns. As the revised document indicates, a copy of the Fire Chief s directive should be enclosed with the copy of the letter that is ultimately sent to Mr. Slobodanka. - Zach From: Westfall, John[mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:57 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; Zach Lell Subject: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Rough draft for comment. Please provide by 10/19. <<MeadowdaleMarina. doc>> John 425 771-0213 10/22/2007 Message Page 1 of 1 Tomberg, Thomas To: Zach Lell; Westfall, John Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Good morning, Looks good, with some thoughts: 1. 1 assume the name in the "Dear" heading is the legal owner. We had heard it was Milo's sister. Just checking. 2. Assistant Chief Mark Correira actually issued Directive 2007-03 on September 21 on my instructions so you may want to reword the sentence in the fourth paragraph to say something like "In light of the inherently.....' Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 stating' "that no firefighting...." 3. Later in the fourth paragraph, consider rewording to read "A copy of the Fire Department Directive..." instead of "A copy of the Fire Chiefs directive..." Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:24 PM To: Westfall, John Cc: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc John: Scott Snyder and I collaborated on this matter and our suggested changes to your draft letter are highlighted in the attached document. Please review the revised draft at your convenience and contact me with any additional questions or concerns. As the revised document indicates, a copy of the Fire Chief s directive should be enclosed with the copy of the letter that is ultimately sent to Mr. Slobodanka. - Zach From: Westfall, John [mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:57 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; Zach Lell Subject: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Rough draft for comment. Please provide by 10/19. <<MeadowdaleMarina.doc>> John 425 771-0213 10/22/2007 F F.D. 2007-029 • • • NOTICE DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2007 TO: ALL PERSONNEL SUBJECT: REVISED SOP 102.18 MEADOWDALE MARIN I A TACTICAL PLAN Notice 2007-029 announces publication of revised SOP 102.18 Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan. The revised addition recognizes the significant and ongoing deterioration of the pier, and calls out required safety measures for conducting emergency operations on or near the pier. A Tactical Check Off Sheet for Meadowdale Marina Confirmed Fire is added, as well as photos that capture the advanced state of disrepair. Thanks to BC Don White and Assistant Chief Mark Correira for updating the SOP. Hard copies of N2007-029 and revised SOP 102.18 will be distributed via Fire Station Mail this date. Upon receipt, Company Officers will place N2007-029 in the Fire Station Notice Book, and revised SOP 102.18 in the SOP 100 Series Book. Pull Date: 12/31/07 Thomas J. Tom er Fire Chief U:FireUsers:Notices:Notice Format 10/18/2007 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT SOP 102.18 • STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2003 REVISED: OCTOBER 19, 2007 MEADOWDALE MARINA TACTICAL PLAN INTENT To establish emergency response procedures and resource support in the event of a fire or other emergency on the piers at Meadowdale Marina, Grid 507, 16111 - 761h Place West. DISCUSSION Meadowdale Marina, previously known as Laebugten Wharf or Haines Wharf, is in a state of disrepair and continuing deterioration. It is dangerous because of recent neglect, the adjacent double tracks of the Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railway Company, its status as an attractive nuisance, and the public use of a private crossing to access the beach. Additionally, the water supply to the suppression system collapsed in 2006 and is no longer in service. The outside decking is very slippery and sections have deteriorated to a condition that creates a hazard to personnel (see attached pictures), although planking inside the structure is in relatively good shape. The newer section, a metal building with concrete deck, is in good shape. • No portions of the structure will support the weight of emergency vehicles or apparatus. The owner's plans, and what the various regulatory agencies will allow, are not clear now or in the future. Until further notice, strategic and tactical plans for emergency response to Meadowdale Marina appear below. STAFFING AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Safety • Establish safety watches immediately on both north and south tracks with radios and lights (at night). • Request additional resources as required. Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies Handle all non -fire emergencies by following normal procedures with some exceptions: • All personnel must wear personal floatation devices (PFDs) while working on the pier. o At least one member shall be assigned with hand lights to illuminate the path leading to the emergency scene, and the incident scene itself, at night. • Focus apparatus and vehicle lights, and adjustable spotlights on access routes and the scene to provide additional illumination. Fire Response, Smoke Investigation • Personnel shall not access the pier unless a known life hazard is present. • o Investigation of fire or smoke shall occur from the shore side using binoculars, and/or the water side using Marine 16 or other marine units. • Extinguishing pier fires shall be handled from the shore side using master streams Page 1 of 6 SOP 102.18 or an aerial Ladder elevated master stream and/or from the water side using Marine 16 handlines or master streams. • TACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies No apparatus or vehicle will be driven onto the pier under any circumstance. Due to the uneven surface, a gurney will not easily traverse the pier to transfer a patient to an Aid or Medic Unit. For this reason, if not on the dispatch, request SNOCOM send an Engine Company or Ladder Company with a Stokes basket for staffing and equipment assistance. Fire Response and / or Smoke Investigation Small fires on the deck shall be extinguished from the land or water side using the reach of a handline or master streams. Confirmed Large Fire • No attack lines on pier. Arriving crews shall not stretch attack lines out onto the pier in an attempt to fight a large fire. -All responding units shall standby on 75th Place until tactical assignments are given. • First -In. The first -in Engine shall respond down the driveway and set up a deck gun operation, and/or extend hand lines where necessary. Marine 16. The closest available EFD Engine or Ladder Company shall respond to the Port and deploy Marine 16. Once underway, Marine 16 shall contact the Incident • Commander and attempt to give an estimated time of arrival to the pier. Once .on scene marine firefighting efforts will be coordinated with the Incident Commander. The Incident Command shall direct SNOCOM to request: 1. ESCA (425-776-3722), and that they notify the Department of Ecology. 2. Utility Package so PUD can cut power to the pier. 3. US Coast Guard (206-442-7070) to act in liaison and resource procurement role, but with no fire -fighting capability. 4. Kingston Marine 81 from North Kitsap Fire and Rescue #10 via Kitsap CenCom (360-308-5400). 5. Seattle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center (206-490-2965). Seattle will respond if available. 6. SNOCOM notify the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (1-800- 832-5452, 206-625-6362) of the fire and.traffic in the Meadowdale Marina Crossing (MP 21.26).. • Master Stream Operations. The first -in Engine takes its own supply using the fire hydrant at the base of the driveway. • Call Back Resources. Because the operation is staff intensive and requires many hours to mitigate, an Edmonds Engine is used in this evolution. The Incident Commander considers staffing the Reserve Engine with callback personnel. • Flying Embers. Depending on wind direction and thermal column produced, it may be • necessary to use first alarm or additional resources to watch for and respond to flying embers landing on wood roofs, and in grasses and landscape throughout the area. Page 2 of 6 SOP 102.18 • a r, o Public Information. Burning embers and toxic smoke may drift into residential neighborhoods and pose additional challenges. Coordinate neighborhood contacts and public information with the Police Department. Hazardous Materials. Containment of a large fuel or oil spill in the water may require a hazardous materials response. There are approximately ten boats, one car (in the metal building), and one truck housed on the pier. Request a Hazmat Technician or Team response as required. If required, notify ESCA (425-776-3722) to secure a State Mission Number and initiate a call for resources to contain spills from the water side. Notify the US Coast Guard (206-442-7070) concerning fuel spills or hazards caused by floating debris as timbers and planks detach from the pier and enter Puget Sound. OWNER INFORMATION The owner's representative is Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic (206-353-6456). PRE -PLAN The Meadowdale Marina pre -plan, along with a check -off list of items the_owner was required to mitigate or provide, is located under the large status board in the Battalion Chief vehicle. As with any tactical plan, this document serves as a guideline and may be modified by the first -in Company Officer or Incident Commander as required. Enclosed are the Meadowdale Marina Prefire Plan and a Tactical Plan Check -Off Sheet for a • Large Fire: • C� Thomas J. T mb rg Fire Chief Page 3 of 6 SOP 102.18 TACTICAL CHECK OFF SHEET FOR MEADOWDALE MARINA CONFIRMED FIRE • ❑ Size -up; notify BNSF ❑ Establish Command, Locate Command Post ❑ Marine 16 is underway and, if needed, Kingston Marine 81 via Kitsap CenCom; request Seattle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center ❑ Request additional resources as required. Owner's representative is Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic at 206-353-6456 ❑ Notify Chief Officers/Fire Marshal ❑ Request Utility Package ❑ Request ESCA (Department.of Ecology) and Coast Guard (no firefighting capability) ❑ Base all incoming units on 75t" Place ❑ Position Engine at base of driveway, east of railroad tracks; take own supply with on -site hydrant, deploy deck gun and / or handlines ❑ Establish "Division or Group" to monitor flying embers in neighborhood ❑ Assign Engine for immediate ember control and stopping pier fires close to railroad tracks. Additional Engines and / or Ladders with master streams may be used for fire suppression and/or flying embers control ❑ Spill containment ❑ Debris containment in Puget Sound ❑ Public information Page 4 of 6 14 ile , zL.4' I "gal, w 4 p Message Page 1 of 2 Westfall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:35 AM To: 'Zach Lell' Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; Bowman, Duane Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Thanks Zach. I am sure Duane and Jeannine can confirm unless they already have and that name is correct. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:03 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark; Westfall, John Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Good Morning, Chief: I've revised the attached draft to reflect your second and third points below. With respect to the addressee, my own file materials are unclear regarding the identity of the marina's true owner, and I would need to defer to staff on this point. The permit applicant was Vladan Milosavljevic, but he is consistently referenced in the application documents and correspondence as the General Manager of Meadowdale Marina, LLC rather than the owner per se. I had assumed that John originally addressed the draft letter to Mr. Slobodanka because he was in fact the owner. Perhaps Duane and/or Jeannine can clarify this point. - Zach From: Tomberg, Thomas [mailto:tomberg@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:44 AM To: Zach Lell; Westfall, John Cc: Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder; Correira, Mark Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc 10-22-07 Good morning, Looks good, with some thoughts: 1. 1 assume the name in the "Dear" heading is the legal owner. We had heard it was Milo's sister. Just checking. 2. Assistant Chief Mark Correira actually issued Directive 2007-03 on September 21 on my instructions so you may want to reword the sentence in the fourth paragraph to say something like "In light of the inherently.....' Edmonds Fire Chief Thomas J. Tomberg instructed Assistant Chief Mark Correira to issue Directive 2007-03 stating' "that no firefighting...." 3. Later in the fourth paragraph, consider rewording to read "A copy of the Fire Department Directive..." instead of "A copy of the Fire Chief's directive..." 10/23/2007 fifessage Page 2 of 2 Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Zach Lell [mailto:zlell@omwlaw.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:24 PM To: Westfall, John Cc: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; W. Scott Snyder Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc John: Scott Snyder and I collaborated on this matter and our suggested changes to your draft letter are highlighted in the attached document. Please review the revised draft at your convenience and contact me with any additional questions or concerns. As the revised document indicates, a copy of the Fire Chiefs directive should be enclosed with the copy of the letter that is ultimately sent to Mr. Slobodanka. - Zach From: Westfall, John[mailto:Westfall@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:57 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; Zach Lell Subject: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Rough draft for comment. Please provide by 10/19. <<MeadowdaleMari na.doc>> John 425 771-0213 10/23/2007 2007 Mr. Stepan( 23423 Brier Brier, WA Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings, 16111 76`h Place West Dear Mr. Slobodanka: I am sending this notice to you in your capacity as the owner of the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, An January 25` , 2003 your marina building suffered a partial collapse, as an apparent result of which,the on -sit fire protections stem became impaired. At that time I agreed.that the impaired sprinkler system could remain dormant until building repairs were complete as long as: 1) substantial reconstruction work -was --_- being conducted with an active building permit, and 21no public or private activities other than actual repair work were being conducted at the marina,__ On September 21, 2007, the fire department responded to a structure fire at your marina. Using combined land and marine resources, the fire was extinguished at tremendous risk to the firefighters operating on your marina. Since 2003, we have been guided !specific local operating procedures in a separate tactical plan to enable us to help protect your property. However, by your inaction to date you have failed to correct the dangerous condition of the marina structure. The marina poses a severe risk to fire personnel and other first responders in the event of a fire or other emergency. In light of the inherently dangerous condition of the marina structure, Edmonds Fire Chief Tomberg has issue a directive,that no firefighting personnel shall board or access your pier except at the discretion of the incident commander and to the extent directly necessary_to prevent an imminent threat to human life or safety,Pursuant to applicable safety regulations, including but not limited to Chapter 296-305 WAC, the extent to which fire personnel may ultimately be deployed to the pier will depend upon the incident commander's determination in balancing the severity of the life/safety threat with the risk to fire personnel. A copy of the Fire Chiefs directive is enclosed for your information. Please carefully review the directive, consult your legal counsel and insurance carrier as appropriate, and plan accordingly. This notice serves to warn you of the limits the fire department can safely operate under in any attempts to protect your property. Please contact me at (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions. {1ZL676835.DOC;1/00006.900000/) Deleted: 0 - j Deleted:. ll Deleted: The Deleted: was Deleted: able Deleted:: 1) { Deleted: that Deleted: , that the impaired sprinkler system could remain dormant until building repairs were complete Deleted: under Deleted: No apparent relief has been provided to the fire department by you to help protect your property from fire. - tDeleted: passed Deleted: now Deleted: when Deleted: can be corrected. Sincerely, John J. Westfall Fire Marshal enc. Cc: City Attorney Zach Lell Building Official Jeannine Graf (]ZL676835. DOC;1 /00006.900000/) g�c Mr. Stepan( 23423 Brier Brier, WA Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings, 16111 76th Place West 2007 n r• W Dear Mr. Slobodanka: On January 25� 2003 your marina building suffer artial ollapse. The fire protection system became impaired. At that tim I was agreeab e. 1) as long as substantial reconstruction work was being conduc a wi an ac ive building permit, and 2) that no public or private activities were being conducted at the marina, that the impaired sprinkler system could remain dormant until building repairs were complete. P On September 21, 2007,fire department responded to a structure fire at your marina. Using combined land and marine resources, the fire was extinguished at tremendous risk to the firefighters operating on your marina. Since 2003, we have been guided under specific local operating procedures in a separate tactical plan to enable us to help protect your property. No apparent relief has been provided to the fire department by you to help protect your property from fire. Edmonds Fire ChiefTomberg has passed a directive -newthat.no� firefighting personnel shall board or access your pier except when imminent threat to life can be corrected. This notice serves to warn you of the limits the fire department can safely operate under in any attempts to protect your property. Please contact me at (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John J. Westfall Fire Marshal Cc: City Attorney Zach Lell Building Official Jeannine Graf Westfall, John From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 4:31 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: MeadowdaleMarina.doc I ow the owner as: Meadowdale Marina LLC Vladan Milosavljevic, General Man er ----Gr-iginal Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 2:57 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine; 'zlell@omwlaw.com' Subject: MeadowdaleMarina.doc Rough draft for comment. Please provide by 10/19. << File: MeadowdaleMarina.doc >> John 425 771-0213 Tomberg, Thomas From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, OcL tober 03, 2007710:08 AM To: - Tomberg, Thomas; Correira; Mark; White, Donald Cc: Smith -Mike Subject: RE:LMeadowdale Marina 16111 761th PI-W Chief: I won't transmit yet. Zach & Jeannine have requested also to review my correspondence prior to sending. More to follow on the 'coincidental' contact and how that will affect the enforcement plan. His substantial commencement of work was one of the key issues that could slow the process. John -----Original Message ----- From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 9:54 AM To: Correira, Mark; Westfall, John; White, Donald Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th PI W 10-3-07 Let's not send anything to Milo yet, just assemble the package. Coincidentally, at 1520 yesterday afternoon, Milo contacted the second floor (I think via voice mail) and told them he is ready to proceed with work on the marina. You will recall the discussion about the permit he was issued and the duration of it. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Correira, Mark Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:07 PM To: Westfall, John; Tomberg, Thomas; White, Donald Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th PI W John, Don, Jeanne and are planning to get up the pier before weeks end. We will gather the photos and update the SOP. Once published and Ok-ed by the Chief it can be sent to Milo via your channels. Mark -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 4:28 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Correira, Mark; White, Donald Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th PI W Duane, Jeannine, Zach & I remained to discuss ramifications to the abatement process. We further discussed timing of shoreline exemption & non -conforming use permit processes. Because of the complexity of property and jurisdictions, this will not be quick process. Council will be engaged to assist to see to hazard removal. Once we have assembled the FD SOP, it was pointed out that information should be delivered to Milo as a property owner with a property distinct for the FD to warrant operational standards different than the approach to any other property. So please keep me in the SOP development loop and I'll send that to him. Zach would like a good catalog of current photos looking at the property, hazards, dilapidation, etc... Don -will you take that assignment? Tomberg, Thomas From: Wes IIII John Sent: Tuesday October 02 2007,4 28 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Correira, Mark; White, Donald Cc: Smith, Mike_ Subject: Meadowdale,Marina 1.6111-76th�,Pl, Duane, Jeannine, Zach & I remained to discuss ramifications to the abatement process. We further discussed timing of shoreline exemption & non -conforming use permit processes. Because of the complexity of property and jurisdictions, this will not be quick process. Council will be engaged to assist to see to hazard removal. Once we have assembled the FD SOP, it was pointed out that information should be delivered to Milo as a property owner with a property distinct for the FD to warrant operational standards different than the approach to any other property. So please keep me in the SOP development loop and I'll send that to him. Zach would like a good catalog of current photos looking at the property, hazards, dilapidation, etc... Don -will you take that assignment? Thanks, John Tomberg, Thomas From: White, Donald ; Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 2;12 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale marina fire - 1 All, Pictures from this morning's boathouse fire are located at: U:\Fire Users\GRAPHICS\Mal6 Meadowdale. An outstanding job by everyone involved kept the fire in check. A good call by BC Dahl sent Marine 16, which proved its firefighting prowess with the very capable crew of Lt. Anderson, FF Campbell, and "Skipper" Martin. A/Lt. Soucy directed pier side firefighting efforts with the help of FF/PM Beardsley and PFF Bailey (Who is easy to steal the nozzle from). Please note the condition of the pier in some of the photos... Directive to follow. Thanks, Marine Bureau ila ondso AYannaq� 7 badly amaged by fire Meadowdale � Marina was closed Friday after a fire caused extensive damage, officials said. Firefighters extinguished early morning blaze from aboaL Edmonds Fire Battalion Chief Doug Dahl said. Crews arrived just before 7 a.m. in the 16100 block of 76th Place to , find. smoke coming from the marina and fire slowly spreading under the -pier, ,he said. r, had It -.appe�A �sP started a small cooking fire in side... the marina that burned . through the floor, he said. :. The ' fire remains , under Bank robbery-suspec es c es from po ' e Afteran rouss hthrough an apartmen mplex, police were unabl man sus- pected o bbing a b -day mo in Edmonds. : .ce swarmed the Park 2 EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT 121 5TH AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 425-771-0215 FAX 425-775-7721 For Release: September 21, 2007 (date) PUBLIC INFORMATION NEWS RELEASE Date: 09/21/2007 Time of Alarm: 0641 Incident Location: 16111 761h PL W Edmonds, WA 98026 Type of Incident: ❑Residential Fire ❑Apartment Fire ❑Motor Vehicle Accident ❑Rescue Response ❑Medical Emergency ❑Other Responding Units/Personnel: Arrival Time: 0649 ®Commercial Fire ❑Haz Mat Response Engine Companies: 2 Ladder Companies: 1 Aid/Medic Units: 2 Support 7: # of Fire Fighters: 17 # of Chief Officers: 4 Other: Marine 16 (public safety boat) Other Agencies Assisting: Lynnwood Fire Department, Edmonds Police Reporting Party: Homeowner across from structure Situation Found: Edmonds Units arrived to find a marina structure with light smoke coming from the west side. One crew wearing full protective clothing and life vests was sent out onto the dock to investigate and reported that there was a small fire that burned through the pier floor and was spreading slowly under the pier. Action Taken: Firefighting crews on the dock used portable fire extinguishers to knock down the fire enough to slow the fire spread until Marine 16 (Edmonds Public Safety Boat) arrived and used water and foam to extinguish the fire under the pier. Department of Ecology was notified. Special Problems/Accomplishments: Meadowdale Marina is closed to public access and is in a deteriorated structural condition with portions of the pier and structure collapsed into the Sound. Due to its condition, firefighters are allowed on the pier only if needed for investigational purposes. Fire cause is under investigation, but it appears that possible trespassers had started a small cooking fire inside the marina that burned through the floor. Injuries/Fatalities: (Do not release names) Gender Age Injuries Where Taken NONE Extent of Damage: Burned an eight -foot diameter hole through the pier floor. Due to the condition of the structure, damage is estimated at $0 Damage Estimate: $0 Structure $0 Contents Released Prepared By: Doug Dahl Position: Battalion Chief Directive F.D. 2007-03 t yrr. PAR't�Q�� DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 TO: ALL DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL SUBJECT: MEADOWDALE MARINA RESPONSES Today's fire response to the Meadowdale Marina revealed the extreme deterioration of the decking surfaces and support beams creating a hazard to response personnel. SOP 102.18 Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan is under review and expected to be revised within the next week. Until further notice, Fire Department personnel should stay off the pier unless a known life hazard is present. If access is required crews should be in full PPE, including PFDs, and should only be on the pier long enough to mitigate the life hazard. Reconnaissance efforts for a response to this pier shall be done from the land side using binoculars, or water side using Marine 16. Mark/J. Correira Assistant Fire Chief M U:FireUsers:Directives:2007Directives;'07 Format Tomberg, Thomas To: Subject: Westfall, John; Correira, Mark RE: Meadowdale Marina M John, SOP 102.18 is the tactical plan; updating is a joint effort. Also see the photos posted by BC White, and Directive 2007-003 Meadowdale Marina Responses, dated September 21, 2007. At yesterday's Director's Meeting, Duane Bowman announced that the fire and Directive 2007-003 provided them the impetus to address demolition of the wharf. The meeting you and Mark will attend is apparently the follow-up to his comments. If you have not been out there recently, the 2006-2007 winter storms really took a toll. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:35 AM To: Chief Tomberg; Correira, Mark Subject: Meadowdale Marina Chiefs: I have a meeting with attorney and bidg on 10/2 regarding enforcement on the Marina. Where is the SOP deadline and who's in charge of revision? John Tomberg, Thomas Subject: FW: Haines Wharf Location: Fire Conference Room Start: Tue 10/2/2007 2:30 PM End: Tue 10/2/2067 3:30 PM Show Time As: Tentative Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Not yet responded -----Original Appointment ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:02 AM To: Graf, Jeannine; Bowman, Duane; Chave, Rob; Gannon, Gerald; Correira, Mark; Smith, Mike Subject: Haines Wharf When: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 2:30 PM-3:30 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada). Where: Fire Conference Room Purpose of meeting is to meet with City Attorney to strategize on enforcement action. Tomberg, Thomas To: Startzman, Jeanne Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina Pics A A IMG_0054Jpg (93 IMG_0038Jpg (52 KB) KB) IMG_0039.jpg (56 IMG 0049.jpg (38 KB) KB) 4 0 Jeanne, Please print these on your color printer. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Correira, Mark Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:17 PM To: Haakenson, Gary; Bowman, Duane; Smith, Debbie; Compaan, Al; Gannon, Gerald Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: Meadowdale Marina Pics Mayor, Chiefs, and Director, See pics for a follow-up to the Directive email. Thanks, Mark The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: IMG 0054 IMG 0038 IMG_0039 IMG 0049 Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. Tomberg, Thomas From: Correira, Mark Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:07 PM To: Fire Dept Group Cc: Haakenson, Gary; Gannon, Gerald; Smith, Debbie; Compaan, At; Bowman, Duane Subject: D2007-003 D2007-003.doc(39 KB) Sept. 21, 2007 Fire Dept Group, Directive 2007-003 is published effective today and directs crews to not access the pier at the Meadowdale Marina unless a known life -hazard is present. Today's fire call at the end of the dock revealed the decking and support beams on the pier are in an extreme deteriorated condition creating a hazard to EFD Personnel. This Directive is in effect until further notice. Please call me with questions. Thanks, Mark Mayor Haakenson EPD A -Chief of Police Compaan EPD AC Gannon EPD A -AC D. Smith Director Bowman Directive F.D. 2007-03 DIRECTIVE bEPAWT DATE: SEPTEMB RE 2U 2007 TO: ALL DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL SUBJECT: MEADOWDALE MARINA RESPONSES Today's fire response to the Meadowdale Marina revealed the extreme deterioration of the decking surfaces and support beams creating a hazard to response personnel. SOP 102.18 Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan is under review and expected to be revised within the next week. Until further notice, Fire Department personnel should stay off the pier unless a known life -hazard is present. If access is required crews should be in full PPE, including PFDs, and should only be on the pier long enough to mitigate the life hazard. Reconnaissance efforts for a response to this pier shall be done from the land side using binoculars, or water side using Marine 16. Mark J. Correira Assistant Fire Chief 0 U: Fire Users: Directives: 2007Directives;'07 Format � V tv�c�!Q_�d�,�.�-- er zoo ?'-003 09/23/07 19:56:25 PRINT REQUESTED BY TERMINAL EFPC22 Incident History for: #EF07003327 Xref: #EP07022843 Case Numbers: $EF07003739 $LF07004574 $5207017442 Received 09/21/07 06:40:52 BY SCPC04 SC721 Entered 09/21/07 06:41:39 BY SCPC04 SC721 Dispatch_ed 09_/2.1/07 06:41:45 BY SCPCO2 SC754 Enroute �09/21/07 06:44:01 Onscene 09/21/07 06:49:38 Closed 09/21/07 09:22:23 Initial Type: FC rInitial Alarm Level: 1 Final Alarm Level: 1 Final Type: FC (ARE COMMERCIAL)1Pri: 1 Dispo: Police BLK: E055 Fire BLK:_EF507— Map Page: 435A-7 Group: EF1 Beat: MD17 Sr Loc: 16111 76 PL W ,_EDM, --MEADOWDALE_MARINE ,EDM high xst: 162 ST W (V) Latitude: (+) 0478532 Longitude: (-) 1223435 Loc Info: JUST SOUTH OF RP Name: MICHAKLA, BOB /0641 (SC721 ) ENTRY /0641 (SC754 ) DISP B16 /0641 $ASNCAS B16 /0641 ASST L15 /0641 /0641 /0641 /0641 /0641 /0641 Addr: CELL PHONE $ASNCAS L15 ASST E14 ASST E16 ASST E17 ASST M17 ASST A15 /0641 ASST /0641 ASST /0641 $ASNCAS /0642 (SC721 ) SUPP /0642 CHANGE /0642 SUPP /0641? (SC746 ) SUPP /0643 /0643 /0643 /0644 /0644 (SC754 ) (SC746 ) (SC754 ) (SC746 ) AIQ AIQ CROSS ENROUT CHANGE Phone: 2067940692 ,COMM FIRE - RP SAYS WHI SMOKE POURING FROM BLDG 4EF0991 DAHL,D-B [E,M] $EF07003739 #LF0806 PONS, P-F (LT) [E, R] #LF1272 STRACHAN,D-P [F] #LF1345 SESSIONS, K-F [E] *WARNING OVERRIDE* W/CHECK FOR MANNING $LF07004574 #LF0623 JOHNSTON,MA-F (LT) [E,H] #LF1307 PFEIL,M-F [E] #LF1633 PETERSON,J-P [F] #EF1126 SOUCY,J-F (L) [M,E,H] #EF2376 BEARDSLEY,D- F [P,M] #EF2532 BAILEY,J-F #EF1425 ANDERSON,T-L [E,M] #EF0510 MARTIN,J-F (L) [E,M] #EF1536 CAMPBELL,T-F (L) [E,M] #EF1082 FLETT,T- F (L) [P,M,R] #EF2313 SCHLEICHER,B-F [P,M,H] #LF0806 PONS, P-F (LT) [E,R] #LF0807 MILLER, K-F [E, H] #LF1345•SESSIONS,K-F [E] EDC1 TAC2 2 TAC22 $5207017442 TXT: RP SAYS BLDG HAS BEEN EMPTY F/12 YRS - NO F LAMES SEEN NAM: --> MICHAKLA, BOB TXT: RP IS OUT ON THE WATER NEAR LOC LOC: 15810 75 PL W ,EDM, :? Q LOCI: JUST" -SOUTH OF RP, NAM: THIRY GIL, ADR: 15810 75 PL W ,EDM, PHO: 4257451461, TXT: SMOKE OUT OF OLD MEADOWDALE BOAT HOUSE TAC22 EDC1 #EP07022843 E14 � ,2ND CALLER -REPORTED WHI SMOKE "POURING" OUT OF THE,OLD BUILDING r- /0644 (SC754 ) ENROUT B16 /0645 ENROUT L15 /0645 ENROUT E16 /0645 ENROUT.. Al 5..._ /0645 (M17 ) *ENROUT M17 /0645 (SC754 ) ENROUT E17 /0646 ASSTER A20 /0649 MISC E17 /0649 ONSCNE E14 /0649 ONSCNE B16 /0650 NEWLOC B16 /0650 NEWLOC E16 /0650 MISC E16 /0651 MISC L15 /0651 (SC746 ) 'CHANGE /0651 (SC754 ) CHGLOC L15 /0651 ONSCNE A15 /0652 (M17 ) *ONSCNE M17 /0652 (SC754 ) ONSCNE M17 /0652 ASSTER AC16 /0652 /0654 /0654 /0654 /0655 /0656 (SC716 ) /0657 /0657 /0658 /0658 /0658 /0700 /0700 /0700 (SC754 ) ONSCNE L15 CALLBK B16 MISC B16 NEWLOC A20 NEWLOC L15 CHANGE CHANGE MISC MISC ASSTER MISC MISC CONTCT MISC /0701 MISC E16 /0701 MISC E16 /0702 MISC E14 /0702 MISC B16 /0702 ONSCNE AC16 /0702 MISC E16 /0703 (SC716 ) CHANGE /0705 (SC754 ) MISC B16 /0706 (SC716 ) CHANGE /0706 (SC754 ) MISC B16 (16111 76 PL W ,EDM] #EF2208 DOWLING,J-F [E,M,R] #EF2261 IFFERT,P-F [P,M] #EF1540 TURNER,A-F [M,E] ,HOLD RESPONSE PER B16 - MAY NEED THE BOAT [75] LARGE PIER NVI - ALL UNITS BASE ON 75 W FI [ MEADOWDALE MARINE CMD ] [ 75 ] ,BRING DOWN - LEAVING ROOM FOPR LADDER - YOUR CR EW DO RECON ,TO CMD - STAGE OR CONTINUE - CONTINUE - STAY UP ON MAIN 76 - IF NEEDED WE WILL BACK YOU DOWN ,2ND RP WILL BE ENRT AS SOON AS HE GETS DRESSED (1ST RP WAS ON THE WATER) [ 76 PL AT 1641 [ 76 ] [16111 76 PL W ,EDM] #EF2341 CORREIRA,M-AC [P] ,BURLING NORTHERN FIRE - ONE CREW ACROSS TRACK - SHUT TRACKS DOWN 1L2 MILE EACH DIRECTION - ,LIGHT SMOKE SHOUWING ONE CREW PUMP CAN LIGHT RE CON r, [ 75 ] [ NORTH MEADOWDALE RD AT 75 PL ] ,ON HOLD W/BURLINGTON NORTHER RR ,*** CAUTION BURLINGTON NORTHERN RR IN AREA TRYI NG TO STOP THE TRAIN **** B16 ,LAUNCH BOAT - FIRE UNDER PIER AT THIS TIME E17 ,FROM CMD - DEPLOY MAR16 MAR16 B16 ,TRAIN APPOACING 1/3 MILE AWAY - B16 ,10,MIN IN TO THIS CALL B16 Contact in 10 Minutes E16 ,UTILIZED PUMP CAN- BUNRT THRU CROSS MEMBERS - S TARTED W/CHARCOAL - PD COME DOWN ,STILL HAVE HOT EMBERS UNDER THE PIER ON CROSS M EMBERS - WATER LOOKS 4 FEET DEEP - ,CAN KNOCK DOWN FURTHER W/2 MORE PUMS CANS - ,FROM CMD - GATHER 2 PUMP CANS FROM STAGING UNIT - _ S AND MEET-E16 ON THE DOCK - ,USING PORT EXT AT THIS TIME ,FROM CMD - SEND ONE PERSON TO MEET E14 CREW ,BURLINGTON NORTH RR ADV EDMONDS FIRE DEPT WAVED THEM THRU ,WAVED THRU ONE SOUNDER TRANSIT - WOULD LIKE TRA CKS CLOSED TILL WE CALL THEM ,*** BURLINGTON NORTH RR - NOTIFIED TO HOLD ALL TRAINS - r.. ,UPDATE - FIRE BURNING UNDER PIER - START SETTIN /0708 /0709 /0709 /0709 /0710 /0710 /0713 /0716 /0716 /0717 /0717 /0718 /0719 /0720 /0720 /0721 /0721 /0724 /0724 /0724 /0729 /0729 /0730 /0730 /0730 /0731 /0731 /0731 /0733 /0733 /0734 /0734 /0735 /0735 /0741 /0741 /0742 /0742 /0743 /0743 (SC746 ) (SC754 ) ASSTER MISC MISC NEWLOC MISC CONTCT NEWLOC MISC MISC MISC NEWLOC ASSTOS MISC MISC CONTCT MISC MISC AOR MISC CHGLOC MISC MISC MISC CONTCT MISC CHANGE ASSTOS MISC MISC $PREMPT ASSTER MISC NEWLOC NEWLOC MISC CONTCT MISC MISC MISC MISC G UP FOR POLICY ON THIS - L15 BACK DOWN HERE - H OOK TO HYDRANT AND SET YOU UP FOR AREAL FIRE CON TROL IS NEEDED 116 . ___.#EF.1524—SMITH,_.MI KE I161'',t ;INSPECTOR'ENRT VIA LAND LINE E16 ,FROM CMD - DIRECT MAR16 WHEN THEY GET THERE MARINA GROUP" E16 [MARINA GROUP ] B16 ,20 MIN IN TO THIS B16 Contact in 10 Minutes E17 [DRIVING MAR16 ] E16 ,TO CMD - PRIMARY COMPLETE - NOTHING FOUND - USE D BOTH EXT - STILL HAVE FIRE UNDER THE PIER. E16 ,SAFE POSITION- STAY OUT THERE - IF NECESSARY MO VE TO FULL DEFENSIVE POSITION B16 ,AC16 SAFETY AC16 [ SAFETY ] B20 ##EF1539 WHITE,D-B [M,E,H] B16 ,TO MAR16 -REPORT TO MARINE GROUP Lr SOUCY - WIL L DIRECT FIRE OPP B16 ,30 MIN IN TO INCIDENT B16 Contact in 10 Minutes MAR16- ,TO MARINE --GROUP - 3-4 FEET OF WATER - 30- TO 40 FEET IN FROM DOCK - TO THE SOUTH OF THE BLU BOA T LIFT MAR16 ,WILL PROCEDE IN JUST SOUTH OF THE BLU BOAT LIFT L15 A20 A20 E16 MAR16 B16 B16 B16 CH16 CH16 A20 A20 L20 E16 B20 AC16 B16 B16 B16 B16 E16 MAR16 /0744 MISC B16 /0744 MISC B16 /0744 MISC B20 /0744 MISC L20 /0744 (M17 ) AOR M17 /0745 (SC754 ) AOR A15 ,BACK TO STA 20 TO GET L20 [ STA 20 ] ,MAR16 GETTING WATER ON THE FIRE NOV ,FROM E16 - CALL ME ON MY NEXTEL ,40 MIN -INTO INCIDENT Contact in 10 Minutes ,SEND DOWN PD ,lE3 RESPONDING TO THE COMMAND POST ,REPORTING TO CMD ,A20 AT STA 20 UNMAND - L20 RESP ONE MIN DELAY #EF2208 DOWLING,J-F [E,M,R] #EF1540-TURNER,A-F [M,E] 4EF2261 IFFERT, P-F [P, M] ,TO CMD - MOST OF FIRE OUT -HANDING A HAND LINE UP TO US - WORK THE TOP SIDE A BIT [ SAFETY ] ,50 MIN INTO INCIDENT Contact in 10 Minutes ,TO GROUP - FIRE EXT - SEND FF TO GEr TRASH POLE -: PIKE.�POLES AND MAR16 SWTICH TO FOAM - ,RELEASING LYNNWOOD UNITS ,BRING BACK E14 EXT ,TO GROUP - WHEN DO YOU WANT THE FOAM? I'LL LET YOU KNOW ,FROM L20 - BASE ON 76 TILL FURTHER ,M17 YOU CAN RETURN ,TO CMD - UNDER CONTROL - L20 NON CODE ,NON CODE /0747 MISC L20 /0748 ONSCNE L20 /0750 MISC B16 /0750 CONTCT B16 /0752 MISC B16 /0752 OK AC16 /0752 OK B16 /0752 OK B20 /0752 OK CH16 /0752 OK E14 /0752 OK E16 /0752 OK E17 /0752 OK I16 /0752 OK L20 /0752 OK MAR16 /0752 ONSCNE MAR16 /0752 ONSCNE I16 /0752 MISC 316 /0753 OK I16 /0753 OK MAR16 /0755 MISC B16 /0756 AIQ E14 /0757 MISC B16 /0757 MISC E16 /0759 MISC. E16 /0759 MISC B16 /0759 AOR L20 /0759 AOR MAR16 /0811 MISC B16 /0812 /0813 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0822 /0824 /0837 /0837 /0837 /0837 /0849 /0850 /0905 (SC746 ) (SC754 ) MISC AC16 MISC E16 MISC B16 AOR AOR AOR AOR AOR AOR AOR CLOSE CHANGE REOPEN DISPOS OK MISC CHANGE B16 AC16 B20 CH16 E16 E17 I16 I16 I16 I16 I16 MISC I16 MISC I16 /0907 MISC I16 /0911 MISC I16 /0922 (SC716 ) CLEAR I16 /0922 CLOSE I16 ,FROM CMD - ON 76 - TO 75 PL - WHEN ARRIVE - BRI NG TRASH HOOK [ 75 PL ] ,ONE HOUR INTO INCIDENT Contact in 10 Minutes ,CANCEL TIMER ,FROM E16 - SEC SEARCH CLEAR - IN OVERHAUL STAGE ,CNTC BN - ALLOW TO OPEN TRACKS - REDUCED SPEED AND SOUND HORN IN THE AAREA - ,BNRR ADVISED ,FIRE WELL OUT ,TO CMD - FIRE OUT OVERHAUL COMPLETE - SECURE MA R16 ,FIRE OUT L20 M17 MAR16 AOR - E16 OS ,FROM SAFETY - HAVE YOU HAD ESCA NOTIFY DOE AND COAST GUARD ABOUT FOAM? ,HOW MUCH FOAM DID YOU USE? 3 QUARTERS OF A BUCK ET ,ON OUR WAY OFF THE DOCK ,BROKEN DOWN - ALL UNITS CLEAR - ADV BNRR BACK T 0 FULL OPERATION ,BNRR NOTIFIED ,NO MORE INFORMATION #EF1524 SMITH, MIKE ,OS.AFTER B16 ADV ALL UNITS CLEAR ,1E3 IS BACK ON SCENE FOR CONTACT W/FIRE MARSHAL L ,LEAVING OFF DOCK SHORTLY ,CHANDRA AT ESCA NEEDS PHONE CALL AT 425 776 372 2 ,HAVE CORREIRA CALL ESCA ,B20 WILL CALL ESCA rFIR Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident #: EF07003327 Case $: $EQ07x003739° Incident Date: 9/2i/20g7 Exposure: 0 Jurisdictional Station: 16 Location Type: Street address Address: 16111 76 PL W City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98026 'Incident Type: Fires in structures other than in a building Shift: B Alarms: 1 Grid: EF507 Aid Type: Automatic aid received Dept Receiving Aid: Incident Number of Dept Receiving Aid: EF07003327 Alarm Time: (06:41:45) 9/21/2007 Arrival Time: (06:49:40) 9/21/2007 Last unit Cleared Time: (08:22:42) 9/21/2007 Controlled Time: (07:34:00) 9/21/2007 Actions Taken: Extinguish r Investigate Enforce code HazMat Released: None Property Value: 228,000 Contents Value: 60,000 Property Loss: 6,000 Contents Loss: 0 Fire Service Deaths: 0 Civilian Deaths: 0 Fire Service Injuries: 1 Civilian Injuries: 0 Detector: Detector did not alert occupants Officer In Charge: JOSEPH SOUCY Assignment: Suppress Mixed Property use: Not mixed use Property use: Dock, marina, pier, wharf S hR. ands Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Person('s) Involved Business name: Meadowdale Role: Owner Marine Name: Phone Number: Address: , Apparatus and Personnel Apparatus ID Personnel ID('s) A15 LF0806 LF0807 LF1345 A20 EF1540 EF2208 EF2261 AC16 EF2341 B16 EF0991 B20 EF1539 CH16 E16 EF1126 EF2376 EF2532 E17 Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Fire Detail Residential Units in Building of Origin: 0 Number of Buildings Involved: 1 Acres Burned: 0 Onsite Material(1) None Storage: None Area of Fire Origin: Structural area, other Heat Source: Hot ember or ash Item First Ignited: Structural member or framing Type of Material First Ignited: Sawn wood, including all finished lumber Fire spread: Not Confined to object of origin Cause of Ignition: Intentional Factors contributing to Ignition (1): Outside/open fire for warming or cooking Human Factors Contributing to Ignition: , Unattended person Equipment Involved in Ignition: None Mobile Property Involved: None Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative B16 responded along with above units to Meadowdale Marina for a reported fire on the pier. Enroute B16 directed E17 to report to Marine 16 and respond. On scene there was a small amount of white smoke coming from the west end of the pier. B16 established Marina Command. Command was located on the private drive of two houses just east of the railroad tracks. Command directed E16 to put on life vests and take a portable extinguisher and do a recon of the pier and report back. E16 reported back that there was a small fire under the pier and that Marine 16 was going to be needed to extinguish completely. B16 announced that the tactical plan for the marina was to set up defensively and that we would begin to place apparatus for that in case MAR16 was unable to reach the fire. Command established a Marine group headed by A/LT Soucy to direct marine operations. AC16 and later B20 were established as Safety Officer. Marine 16 arrived and was able to extinguish the fire from the water. All units except E16 and M16 were returned. Command notified ESCA and asked them to advise Coast Gaurd and DOE that MAR16 used approximately 4 gallons of firefighting foam on the fire and it was visible on the water. Marina Command was terminated and the scene turned over to Inspector 16 for investigation. ./ BC DOUGLAS DAHL Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative B20 responded to a confirmed pier fire with units already on scene. On arrival, I was approached by L15 officer, who expressed his concern over bringing his vehicle down as directed. I relayed the message to IC Dahl. He directed me to send L15 back to service, and have A20 return to quarters and pick up L20. With this task completed, I returned to the CP, where I was reassigned as Aide to Marine Group. After reaching the area of the fire, I was reassigned to Safety. After overhaul was complete, I accompanied Insp. Smith out to the location of the fire. Because the fire was started by people cooking crab, I pulled two crab rings, and placed them outside the gate. It was my hope that this would prevent someone from risking a return trip across the unstable pier. Returning to land -side, I contacted DOE representative David Klein at the request of ESCA. I informed Mr. Klein that we had used 3-4 gallons of foam to prevent a much larger environmental impact of a major pier fire. He agreed that this was a reasonable course of action. BC DONALD WHITE 4i :F t: is Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative E16 responded with other units to a report of a possible fire at Meadowdale Marina, 16111 76th PI. W.. On scene, E16 was directed to don PFD's and perform recon on the structure. Crew gained entry to the pier by cutting the lock on the gate and worked our way out across a deteriorated wood pier. A fire approximately 8x8 was found burning on the west side of the pier. Fire had burned through 3-4 cross members and was extending under the pier. A request for Marine 16 was made. Crew used 2 p-cans and a dry chemical extinguisher to knock down some of the fire. Both primary and secondary searches were made with nothing found. The only area that could not be checked was a boat that was stored high up in the rack storage area. E16 officer became Marine Group leader and directed operations for Marine 16. E16 also assisted in fighting the fire on the topside from 1-3/4 line provided and passed up by Marine 16. Foam was applied and some planks displaced in the overhaul stages. Initial observations were that fire originated in a makeshift bbq on the pier. A metal grate/pan, empty bag of briquettes, and beer bottles were found on scene next to and in the fire area. Further investigation passed on to Inspector 16. Engine 16 returned. FF JOSEPH SOUCY u k.: Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative E17 responded to the Meadowdale marina for a commercial fire. Marine was redirected sceneby command to report to Marine 16 and respond to th i ine 16 conducted arfire attack eer tong a reported to Marine group as ordered byto direct 1" 3/4 line off of Marine 16. Manne16 crew was E16 c ew with hand line to overhaul and extinguish the fire. Marine 16 than helped support conduct foam operations. Marine 16 went in service returning to Port of Edmonds. LtTODD ANDERSON 'rr0:�9�Fr +4 Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative (0641) A-20, responded with B-161 L-15, E-14, E-161 E-17, A-15, to the report of a commercial Ere at the Meadowdale Marina. A-20 responded from Stevens Hospital. We arrived on -scene and staged on 75th PI. Command then sent me back to Sta. 20 to secure apparatus L-20. 0734) L-20 responded. We arrived on -scene at staged on 75th PI. L-20 was placed in-service. �0759) Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data '` rage 1 of 2 N AL 0 QsOnline Government Information & Services Washington * R E AL * Property Information County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us. Date/Time:9/25/2007 9:45:10 AM Answers to Frequentl Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window) Return to Propert Ik nformation Entrypaagg Parcel Number 00513900100700 Prev Parcel Reference 51390010070004 View Nlap of this parcel (opens as new window) General Information Taxpayer Name II Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change. see the information on Name and Address Changes Owner Name II Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the infonnation on Name and Address Changes After a Sale Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 16111 76TH PL W - - - EDIVIONDS, WA 98026-4551 Parcel Legal Description MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-00 - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A Go to top of page rCreasurer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office(opens as new window) 2007 Taxes for this parcel S2,131.11 (Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not included.) To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax StatementRequest fonn or call 425-38S-3366 to request it by phone. Go to top of page Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2007 tax year. Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window) For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessor's Office Property Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons Values exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. littp://web5.co. snohotnish.wa.us/propsys/asr-tr-propinq/PrpIng02-ParcelData.asp?PN=005... 9/25/2007 Snohomish County, OVA Assessor Parcel Data Page 2 of 2 Tax Year 2007 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total S240,000 Tax Year 2008 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total S240,000 Go to top of page Valuation and Property Tax History View Histo[y (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Characteristics Tax Code Area (TCA) 00217 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window) Use Code 749 Other Recreation NEC Size Basis ACRE Size 2.17 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels) Go to top of page 1roperty Structures Type Yr.Built Structure Description Commercial 1920 MEADOWDALE MARINE BOAT STG View Structure Data (opens as new. window) Commercial 1976 View Structure Data. (opens as new window) Go to too of page Property Sales since 7/31/1999 Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window) Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor. Transfer Receipt Sales Excise Deed Other Date Date Price Number Type Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Parcels 10/7/2002 10/9/2002 SO 370965 QC STEPANOVIC AIEADOWDALE MARINA No SLOBODANK-k LLC 5/30/2001 6/1/2001 $300,000 264925 W PHASE 1 LTD STEPANOVIC No SLOBODANICA Go to top of page Property flaps TownshipiRange/Section/Quarter, links to maps Neighborhood 5506000 Explanation of Neighborhood Code (opens as new window) Township 27 Range 04 Section 06 Quarter SE Find parcel maps for this Township/Ran eg /Section ViCNI, Map of this parcel (opens as new window) http:Hweb5.co.snohoniish.wa.us/propsys/asr-tr-propinq/PrpIng02-ParcelData.asp?PN=005... 9/25/2007 Tomberg, Thomas From: Correira, Mark.. . Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:43 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina Pics 1 IMG-0054.jpg (93 IMG-0038.jpg (52 IMG-0039.jpg (56 IMG_0049.jpg (38 D2007-003.doc (36 KB) KB) KB) KB) KB) Mark ----- riginal Message ----- From: Gannon, Gerald_ Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:41 AM To: Police Sergeants; Police Corporals Cc: Compaan, rrAl.;_Smith•,_D_ebbie; Correira, Mark Subject: FW:IMea.dow.da.le_Marina Pics _r-ecommend-we_fo.11ow s.imila-r_preca•u-tion•s-when respend ng to-Meadowdale Marina as the fire epartment has. The decking and supports are failing at the marina making it very unsafe. n assessment needs to be made prior to anyone venturing onto the dock. Only a supervisokr i`ll approve/give permission for an officer to go onto the dock. Please review the ttached documents from the fire department and pass the information onto your officers. -----Original Message ----- From: Correira, Mark Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:17 PM To:.Haakenson, Gary; Bowman, Duane; Smith, Debbie; Compaan, Al; Gannon, Gerald Cc: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: Meadowdale Marina Pics Mayor, Chiefs, and Director, See pies for a follow-up to the Directive email. Thanks, Mark The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: IMG_0054 IMG_0038 IMG_0039 IMG 0049 Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 1 :Wharf f ire Marine 16 extinguishes fire at pier BY JESSE NANCE % THE BEACON After smoke was seen coming from the pier at Meadowdale Marina last week, firefight- ers were dispatched to the scene of the fire, and then to the Port of Edmonds - where the depart- ment's 30-foot boat, Marine 16, is moored. A crew wearing full protective clothing and life vests was sent out to investigate the pier and came back to report a small fire burning through and spreading slowly under the structure. It was too dangerous to access the fire and extinguish it by land, says Chief Don White, so a firefighter crew was sent to go get the boat - marking the first time Marine 16 has been called on for firefighting purposes since it was acquired by the department in January. "It would have been pretty dangerous to effec- tively access the fire by land due to the deterio- rated nature of the pier," says Fire Chief Don White. "Having the boat allowed us to access it from the waterside." Awaiting the boat's arrival, firefighters on the dock used portable fire extinguishers to sta- bilize the small blaze as much as possible. But it wasn't until the arrival of Marine 16 that the fire was quickly and efficiently extinguished. Water and foam were aimed from under the pier by firefighters on the boat. Yet due to the low tide at the time, firefighters on Marine 16 couldn't get as close to the blaze as they had hoped to, says firefighter Tom Campbell, who is also one of the fire station's ship instructors. "Because we couldn't get as close as we would've liked in order to make an efficient ex- tinguishment of the fire," he says, "we basically took some ropes and handed up a line to crews working on top while we pumped in foam and water." The actual firefighting did not take long, Chief White says. The fire - believed to be the result of a small campfire made by trespassers - burned an eight - foot diameter hole through the pier floor. The incident is currently under investigation.. Due to the dilapidated condition of the pier, damage is estimated at $0. Meadowdale Marina is closed to public access and is in a deteriorated structural condition, with portions of the pier and structure collapsed into the Sound. Due to its condition, firefighters are allowed on the pier only if needed for investigational purposes. Above: Marine 16 approaches the dilapi- dated pier at Meadowdale Marina last week . to quell a small blaze onAhe structure. CHAPTER 9 FIFE PF';OTECTIO�J �YSTE�.� SECTION 901 GENERAL 901.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall specify where fire protection systems are required and shall apply to the design, installation, inspection, operation, testing and mainte- nance of all fire protection systems. 901.2 Construction documents. The fire code official shall have the authority to require construction documents and cal- culations for all fire protection systems and to require permits be issued for the installation, rehabilitation or modification of any fire protection system. Construction documents for fire protection systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to system installation. 901.2.1 Statement of compliance. Before requesting final approval of the installation, where required by the fire code official, the installing contractor shall furnish a written statement to the fire code official that the subject fire protec- tion system has been installed in accordance with approved plans and has been tested in accordance with the manufac- turer's specifications and the appropriate installation stan- dard. Any deviations from the design standards shall be noted and copies of the approvals for such deviations shall be attached to the written statement. 901.3 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Section 105.6 and 105.7. 901.4 Installation. Fire protection systems shall be maintained in accordance with the original installation standards for that system. Required systems shall be extended, altered, or aug- mented as necessary to maintain and continue protection whenever the building is altered, remodeled or added to. Alter- ations to fire protection systems shall be done in accordance with applicable standards. 901.4.1 Required fire protection systems. Fire protection systems required by this code or the International Building Code shall be installed, repaired, operated, tested and main- tained in accordance with this code. 901.4.2 Nonrequired fire protection systems. Any fire protection system or portion thereof not required by this code or the International Building Code shall be allowed to be furnished for partial or complete protection provided such installed system meets the requirements of this code and the International Building Code. 901.4.3 Additional fire protection systems. In occupan- cies of a hazardous nature, where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazards of the occupancy, or where the fire code official determines that access for fire appara- tus is unduly difficult, the fire code official shall have the authority to require additional safeguards. Such safeguards include, but shall not be limited to, the following: automatic fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, automatic fire -extinguishing systems, standpipe systems, or portable or fixed extinguishers. Fire protection equipment required under this section shall be installed in accordance with this code and the applicable referenced standards. 901.4.4 Appearance of equipment. Any device that has the physical appearance of life safety or fire protection equip- ment but that does not perform that life safety or fire protec- tion function, shall be prohibited. 901.5 Installation acceptance testing. Fire detection and alarm systems, fire -extinguishing systems, fire hydrant sys- tems, fire standpipe systems, fire pump systems, private fire service mains and all other fire protection systems and appurte- nances thereto shall be subject to acceptance tests as contained in the installation standards and as approved by the fire code official. The fire code official shall be notified before any required acceptance testing. 901.5.1 Occupancy. It shall be.unlawful to occupy any por- tion of a building or structure until the required fire detec- tion, alarm and suppression systems have been tested and approved. 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire detection, alarm and extinguishing systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed. 901.6.1 Standards. Fire protection systems shall . be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with the ref- erenced standards listed in Table 901.6.1. TABLE 901.6.1 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS SYSTEM STANDARD Portable fire extinguishers NFPA 10 Carbon dioxide fire -extinguishing system NFPA 12 Halon 1301 fire -extinguishing systems NFPA 12A Dry -chemical extinguishing systems NFPA 17 Wet -chemical extinguishing systems NFPA 17A Water -based fire protection systems NFPA 25 Fire alarm systems NFPA 72 Water -mist systems NFPA 750 Clean -agent extinguishing systems I NFPA 2001 901.6.2 Records. Records of all system inspections, tests and maintenance required by the referenced standards shall be maintained on the premises for a minimum of three years and shall be copied to the fire code official upon request. 901.6.2.1 Records information. Initial records shall include the name of the installation contractor, type of com- ponents installed, manufacturer of the components, location 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE® 65 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS and number of components installed per floor. Records shall 901.7.6 Restoring systems to service. When impaired also include the manufacturers' operation and maintenance equipment is restored to normal working order, the impair - instruction manuals. Such records shall be maintained on ment coordinator shall verify that all of the following proce- the premises. dures have been implemented: 901.7 Systems out of service. Where a required fire protection system is out of service, the fire department and the fire code official shall be notified immediately and, where required by the fire code official, the building shall either be evacuated or an approved fire watch shall be provided for all occupants left unprotected by the shut down until the fire protection system has been returned to service. Where utilized, fire watches shall be provided with at least one approved means for notification of the fire department and their only duty shall be to perform constant patrols of the pro- tected premises and keep watch for fires. 901.7.1 Impairment coordinator. The building owner shall assign an impairment coordinator to comply with the requirements of this section. In the absence of a specific designee, the owner shall be considered the impairment coordinator. 901.7.2 Tag required. A tag shall be used to indicate that a system, or portion thereof, has been removed from service. 901.7.3 Placement of tag. The tag shall be posted at each fire department connection, system control valve, fire alarm control unit, fire alarm annunciator and fire command cen- ter, indicating which system, or part thereof, has.beeri removed from service. The fire code official shall specify where the tag is to be placed. 901.7.4 Preplanned impairment programs. Preplanned impairments shall be authorized by the impairment coordi- nator. Before authorization is given, a designated individual shall be responsible for verifying that all of the following procedures have been implemented: 1. The extent and expected duration of the impairment have been determined. 2. The areas or buildings involved have been inspected and the increased risks determined. 3. Recommendations have been submitted to manage- ment or building owner/manager. 4. The fire department has been notified. 5. The insurance carrier, the alarm company, building owner/manager, and other authorities having juris- diction have been notified. 6. The supervisors in the areas to be affected have been notified. 7. A tag impairment system has been implemented. 8. Necessary tools and materials have been assembled on the impairment site. 901.7.5 Emergency impairments. When unplanned impairments occur, appropriate emergency action shall be taken to minimize potential injury and damage. The impair- ment coordinator shall implement the steps outlined in Sec- tion 901.7.4. 1. Necessary inspections and tests have been conducted to verify that affected systems are operational. 2. Supervisors have been advised that protection is restored. 3. The fire department has been advised that protection is restored. 4. The building owner/manager, insurance carrier, alarm company and other involved parties have been advised that protection is restored. 5. The impairment tag has been removed. 901.8 Removal of or tampering with equipment. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove, tamper with or otherwise disturb any fire hydrant, fire detection and alarm system, fire suppression system, or other fire appliance required by this code except for the purpose of extinguishing fire, training pur- poses, recharging or making necessary repairs, or when approved by the fire code official. 901.8.1 Removal of or tampering with appurtenances. Locks, gates, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags or seals which have been installed by or at the direction of the fire code official shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 901.9 Recall of fire protection components. Any fire protec- tion system component regulated by this code that is the subject of a voluntary or mandatory recall under federal law shall be replaced with approved, listed components in compliance with the referenced standards of this code. The fire code official shall be notified in writing by the building owner when the recalled component parts have been. replaced. SECTION 902 DEFINITIONS 902.1 Definitions. The following words and terms shall, for the purposes of this chapter and as used elsewhere in this code, have the meanings shown herein. ALARM NOTIFICATION APPLIANCE. A fire alarm sys- tem component such as a bell, horn, speaker, light, or text dis- play that provides audible, tactile, or visible outputs, or any combination thereof. ALARM SIGNAL. A signal indicating an emergency requir- ing immediate action, such as a signal indicative of fire. ALARM VERIFICATION FEATURE. A feature of auto- matic fire detection and alarm systems to reduce unwanted alarms wherein smoke detectors report alarm conditions for a minimum period of time, or confirm alarm conditions within a given time period, after being automatically reset, in order to be accepted as a valid alarm -initiation signal. ANNUNCIATOR. A unit containing one or more indicator lamps, alphanumeric displays, or other equivalent means in 66 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE® S,fibhomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Page 1 of 2 Snohomishftline Government Information & Services CountY4* Washington * R E A L * Property Information County Horne Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us. Date/Time:9/25/2007 9:45:10 AM Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window) Return to Property Information Entry page Parcel Number 00513900100700 Prev Parcel Reference 51390010070004 jj View Man of this parcel (opens as new window) General Information Taxpayer Name 11 Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change,.see the information on Name and :a Address Changes Owner Name 11 Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 1123423 BRIER RD - - - BRIER, WA 98036 If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the information on Name and Address Changes After a Sale Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions) 16i111 7GT�H PaL W - EDMONDS, WA 98026-4551 Parcel Legal Description MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-00 - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A Go to top of page Treasurer's Tax Information Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as new window) 2007 Taxes for this parcel $2,131.11 (Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not included.) To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-388-3366 to request it by phone. Go to top of page Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2007 tax year. Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window) For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes), please contact the Assessor's Office .Property Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons Values exemption. Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill. http://web5.co.snohomish.wa.us/propsys/asr-tr-propinq/Prp1ngO2-ParcelData. asp?PN=005... 9/25/2007 Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Page 2 of 2 Tax Year 2007 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total $240,000 Tax Year 2008 Market Land $12,000 Market Improvement $228,0001 Market Total $240,000 Go to top of page Valuation and Property Tax History View History (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Characteristics Tax Code Area (TCA) 00217 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window) Use Code 749 Other Recreation NEC Size Basis ACRE Size 2.17 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels) Go to top of page Property Structures Type Yr.Built Structure Description Commercial 1920 MEADOWDALE MARINE BOAT STG View Structure Data (opens as new window) Commercial 1976 View Structure Data (opens as new window) Go to top of page Property Sales since 7/31/1999 Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window) Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor. Transfer Receipt Sales Excise Deed Other Date Date Price Number Type Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Parcels 10/7/2002 10/9/2002 $0 370965 QC STEPANOVIC MEADOWDALE MARINA No SLOBODANKA LLC 5/30/2001 6/1/2001 $300,000 264925 W PHASE 1 LTD STEPANOVIC No SLOBODANKA Go to top of page Property Maps Township/Range/Section/Quarter, links to maps Neighborhood 5506000 Explanation of Neighborhood Code (opens as new window) Township 27 Range 04 Section 06 Quarter SE Find parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section View Map of this parcel (opens as new window) http://web5.co. snohomish.wa.us/propsys/asr-tr-propinglPrpIngO2-ParcelData. asp?PN=005... 9/25/2007 r EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT 425-771-0215 121 5TH AVE. N., EDMONDS, WA 98020 FAX 425-775-7721 For Release: September 21, 2007 (date) PUBLIC INFORMATION NEWS RELEASE Date: 09/21/2007 Time of Alarm: 0641 Incident Location: 16111 701' PL W Edmonds, WA 98026 Tyne of Incident: ❑Residential Fire ❑Apartment Fire ❑Motor Vehicle Accident []Rescue Response ❑Medical Emergency ❑Other Responding Units/Personnel: Arrival Time: 0649 ®Commercial Fire ❑Haz Mat Response Engine Companies: 2 Ladder Companies: 1 Aid/Medic Units: 2 Support 7: # of Fire Fighters: 17 # of Chief Officers: 4 Other: Marine 16 (public safety boat) Other Agencies Assisting: Lynnwood Fire Department, Edmonds Police Reporting Party: Homeowner across from structure Situation Found: Edmonds Units arrived to find a marina structure with light smoke coming from the west side. One crew wearing full protective clothing and life vests was sent out onto the dock to investigate and reported that there was a small fire that burned through the pier floor and was spreading slowly under the pier. Action Taken: Firefighting crews on the dock used portable fire extinguishers to knock down the fire enough to slow the fire spread until Marine 16 (Edmonds Public Safety Boat) arrived and used water and foam to extinguish the fire under the pier. Department of Ecology was notified. Special Problems/Accomplishments: Meadowdale Marina is closed to public access and is in a deteriorated structural condition with portions of the pier and structure collapsed into'the Sound. Due to its condition, firefighters are allowed on the pier only if needed for investigational purposes. Fire cause is under investigation, but it appears that possible trespassers had started a small cooking fire inside the marina that burned through the floor. Injuries/Fatalities: (Do not release names) Gender Age Injuries Where Taken NONE Extent of Damage: Burned an eight -foot diameter hole through the pier floor. Due to the condition of the structure, damage is estimated at $0 Damage Estimate: $0 Structure Released Prepared By: Doug Dahl $0 Contents Position: Battalion Chief 16rrr -7sj� & Directive F.D. 2007-03 of EDA, 0 DIRECTIVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 2007 TO: ALL DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL SUBJECT: MEADOWDALE MARINA RESPONSES Today's fire response to the Meadowdale Marina revealed the extreme deterioration of the decking surfaces and support beams creating a hazard to response personnel. SOP 102.18 Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan is under review and expected to be revised within the next week. Until further notice, Fire Department personnel should stay off the pier unless a known life -hazard is present. If access is required crews should be in full PPE, including PFDs, and should only be on the pier long enough to mitigate the life hazard. Reconnaissance efforts for a response to this pier shall be done from the land side using binoculars, or water side using Marine 16. Mark J. Correira Assistant Fire Chief 0 U: Fire Users: Directives:2007Directives;'07 Format f to Fire pncident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident #: EF07003327 Case $: $EF07003739 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Exposure: 0 Jurisdictional Station: 16 Location Type: Street address Address: 16111 76 PL W City: Edmonds State: WA Zip: 98026 Incident Type: Fires in structures other than in a building Shift: B Alarms: 1 Grid: EF507 Aid Type: Automatic aid received Dept Receiving Aid: Incident Number of Dept Receiving Aid: EF07003327 Alarm Time: (06:41:45) 9/21/2007 Arrival Time: (06:49:40) 9/21/2007 Last Unit Cleared Time: (08:22:42) 9/21/2007 Controlled Time: (07:34:00) 9/21/2007 Actions Taken: Extinguish Investigate Enforce code HazMat Released: None Property Value: 228,000 Property Loss: 6,000 Fire Service Deaths: 0 Fire Service Injuries: 1 Contents Value: 60,000 Contents Loss: 0 Civilian Deaths: 0 Civilian Injuries: 0 Detector: Detector did not alert occupants Officer In Charge: JOSEPH SOUCY Assignment: Suppress Mixed Property Use: Not mixed use Property Use: Dock, marina, pier, wharf i Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Person('s) Involved Business name: Meadowdale Role: Owner Marine Name: Phone Number: Address: , Apparatus and Personnel Apparatus ID Personnel ID('s) A15 LF0806 LF0807 LF1345 A20 EF1540 EF2208 EF2261 AC16 EF2341 B16 EF0991 B20 EF1539 CH16 E16 EF1126 EF2376 EF2532 E17 Fore pncident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative E16 responded with other units to a report of a possible fire at Meadowdale Marina, 16111 76th PI. W.. On scene, E16 was directed to don PFD's and perform recon on the structure. Crew gained entry to the pier by cutting the lock on the gate and worked our way out across a deteriorated wood pier. A fire approximately W was found burning on the west side of the pier. Fire had burned through 3-4 cross members and was extending under the pier. A request for Marine 16 was made. Crew used 2 p-cans and a dry chemical extinguisher to knock down some of the fire. Both primary and secondary searches were made with nothing found. The only area that could not be checked was a boat that was stored high up in the rack storage area. E16 officer became Marine Group leader and directed operations for Marine 16. E16 also assisted in fighting the fire on the topside from 1-3/4 line provided and passed up by Marine 16. Foam was applied and some planks displaced in the overhaul stages. Initial observations were that fire originated in a makeshift bbq on the pier. A metal grate/pan, empty bag of briquettes, and beer bottles were found on scene next to and in the fire area. Further investigation passed on to Inspector 16. Engine 16 returned. FF JOSEPH SOUCY Tvlet)-Vo PAS, Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative B20 responded to a confirmed pier fire with units already on scene. On arrival, I was approached by L15 officer, who expressed his concern over bringing his vehicle down as directed. I relayed the message to IC Dahl. He directed me to send L15 back to service, and have A20 return to quarters and pick up L20. With this task completed, I returned to the CP, where I was reassigned as Aide to Marine Group. After reaching the area of the fire, I was reassigned to Safety. After overhaul was complete, I accompanied Insp. Smith out to the location of the fire. Because the fire was started by people cooking crab, I pulled two crab rings, and placed them outside the gate. It was my hope that this would prevent someone from risking a return trip across the unstable pier. Returning to land -side, I contacted DOE representative David Klein at the request of ESCA. I informed Mr. Klein that we had used 3-4 gallons of foam to prevent a much larger environmental impact of a major pier fire. He agreed that this was a reasonable course of action. BC DONALD WHITE lF--,)4�i't UAL.: Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative 0641) A-20, responded with B-16, L-15, E-14, E-16, E-17, A-15, to the report of a commercial ire at the Meadowdale Marina. A-20 responded from Stevens Hospital. We arrived on -scene and staged on 75th PI. Command then sent me back to Sta. 20 to secure apparatus L-20. (0734) L-20 responded. We arrived on -scene at staged on 75th PI. L-20 was placed in-service. (0759) o FF 7OHN DOWLING J Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative E17 responded to the Meadowdale marina for a commercial fire. E17 was redirected by command to report to Marine 16 and respond to the incident. Marine 16 arrived on scene and reported to Marine group as ordered by command. Marine 16 conducted a fire attack using a 1" 3/4 line off of Marine 16. Marine16 crew was able to direct hand line under the peer to extinguish the fire. Marine 16 than helped support E16 crew with hand line to overhaul and conduct foam operations. Marine 16 went in service returning to Port of Edmonds. Lt TODD ANDERSON Fire pncident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Narrative B16 responded along with above units to Meadowdale Marina for a reported fire on the pier. Enroute B16 directed E17 to report to Marine 16 and respond. On scene there was a small amount of white smoke coming from the west end of the pier. B16 established Marina Command. Command was located on the private drive of two houses just east of the railroad tracks. Command directed E16 to put on life vests and take a portable extinguisher and do a recon of the pier and report back. E16 reported back that there was a small fire under the pier and that Marine 16 was going to be needed to extinguish completely. B16 announced that the tactical plan for the marina was to set up defensively and that we would begin to place apparatus for that in case MAR16 was unable to reach the fire. Command established a Marine group headed by A/LT Soucy to direct marine operations. AC16 and later B20 were established as Safety Officer. Marine 16 arrived and was able to extinguish the fire from the water. All units except E16 and M16 were returned. Command notified ESCA and asked them to advise Coast Gaurd and DOE that MAR16 used approximately 4 gallons of firefighting foam on the fire and it was visible on the water. Marina Command was terminated and the scene turned over to Inspector 16 for investigation. BC DOUGLAS DAHL Fire Incident Report Edmonds Fire Department Incident Number: EF07003327 Exposure: 0 Incident Date: 9/21/2007 Fire Detail Residential Units in Building of Origin: 0 Number of Buildings Involved: 1 Acres Burned: 0 Onsite Material(1) None Storage: None Area of Fire Origin: Structural area, other Heat Source: Hot ember or ash Item First Ignited: Structural member or framing Type of Material First Ignited: Sawn wood, including all finished lumber Fire spread: Not Confined to object of origin Cause of Ignition: Intentional Factors contributing to Ignition (1): Outside/open fire for warming or cooking Human Factors Contributing to Ignition: , Unattended person Equipment Involved in Ignition: None Mobile Property Involved: None /�/yloG 9�� Message Page 1 of 4 Westfall, John From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:33 PM To: Gebert, David Cc: Westfall, John; Smith, Mike; Fire Dept Group Subject: RE: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA 10-4-06 Hi David, Fire supports removal of the temporary pole. Comments from Fire Marshal Westfall and Inspector Smith are below. John, Please place this email in the Haines Wharf/Laebutgen Pier/Meadowdale Marina file. Thanks. TT Chief: "Fire Protection for the structure is already impaired and the owner has agreed to keep the gates locked from any use of the property. I find no problems removing temp electrical service if there is no dock protection and no occupancy use to protect from. And this will eliminate all electrical fire risk on the dock." Fire Marshal John Westfall "Since the fire line fell into Puget Sound the fire sprinklers are not active, including the dry system that requires power for compressed air in the piping, I would say go ahead and remove the pole." Inspector Mike Smith IN -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:20 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Chrisman, Lyle; McConnell, Jeanie Subject: FW: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA Tom, Please see the note from Don Holdridge, Sno PUD, below. I have discussed this with Duane, Noel, Stephen and Rob, and we have no objection to the removal of the temporary power pole at Haines Wharf. Do you have any objection to removal of the pole? Thanks, Dave -----Original Message ----- From: Holdridge, Don [mailto:DLHoldridge@snopud.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:54 PM To: Gebert, David Subject: RE: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA Good afternoon David, please let me know if you are in support of the PUD removing the pole we set for the purpose of providing temporary service to the old pier. Milo has not installed any equipment to support electrical service and the timeline you agreed to has come and gone. You had approved the temporary service and pole set for one year as noted in your email below. If you are in support, we will notify Milo that we will schedule to have the pole removed and that should be the end of this effort to provide service to the pier until Milo can provide other means to accept electrical service safely. Thanks, Don 10/4/2006 Message Page 2 of 4 Snohomish County PUD . Distribution Services Manager - South County 425-670-3201 425-239-1052 - Cell 425-335-8414 - Page 425-267-6178 Fax -----Original Message ----- From: Holdridge, Don Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:27 PM To: Grove, Richard Subject: RE: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA Please share this information with Milo. Thanks, Don Snohomish County PUD Distribution Services Manager - South County 425-670-3201 425-239-1052 - Cell 425-335-8414 - Page 425-267-6178 Fax -----Original Message ----- From: Grove, Richard Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 3:54 PM To: Holdridge, Don Cc: Smith, Terry Subject: FW: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA FYI, Don & Terry -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David [mailto:Gebert@ci.edmonds.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 3:25 PM To: Grove, Richard Cc: Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Hawkins, Jaime; Chave, Rob Subject: RE: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA Mr. Grove, Your request to install a temporary meter pole and a temporary overhead private electric service line to Haines Wharf as a temporary repair to the previously existing overhead electric service is approved due to the emergency nature of the required repair. This temporary overhead private service line is approved for a period of one year from today. You will be required to obtain a Shoreline exemption. letter from our Planning Division. They will need you to submit applicable site plan, diagrams, and description of work. You can submit them electronically in PDF form if that works for you. The Planning Division can issue the exemption letter quite quickly. For additional information regarding the Shoreline exemption requirement, please contact Rob Chave, 425 771 0220, or by e-mail at chave .ci.edmonds.wa.us A right of way permit will also be required for work within the City right of way (76th Place W or 162nd St SW). Within one year from today, a development/permit application must be submitted for a permanent INHAGIL Message Page 3 of 4 solution, to include an underground private electric service in compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 18.05. David K. Gebert, PE City Engineer City of Edmonds -----Original Message ----- From: Grove, Richard [mailto:RGGrove@snopud.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 5:16 PM To: gebert@ci.edmonds.wa.us Cc: Holdridge, Don Subject: FW: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA -----Original Message ----- From: Grove, Richard Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 5:05 PM To: Holdridge, Don Subject: HAINES WHARF, FORMERLY MEADOWDALE MARINA CITY OF EDMONDS Attn: David K. Gebert, P.E. Development Services Department Engineering Division Dear David Gebert: The Snohomish P.U.D. has determined there is a hazardous condition at the old Meadowdale Marina. Our system neutral came down last Saturday, 6/04/05, and the service has been de - energized since that time. After review of the situation by our Line Department, we have determined the pier has deteriorated to the point that we are no longer able to maintain our facilities. The stability of the distribution pole is in question since it is attached to the pier. The purpose of this letter, is to request permission to set a meter pole, on a temporary basis, as a means to maintain power service for the customer. Our primary concern is the possibility of the (3) transformers on the pole at the pier, falling into the water in an emergency, likely causing an oil spill. Through the use of a barge, our crews will be removing these transformers and the high voltage three phase primary overhead lines, this Friday morning, 6/10/05. The property owner, Vlavan Milosavljevic, is concerned about power for his fire alarm/sprinkler system. A meter pole could allow an overhead private service to restore power to his fire prevention system in a expeditious manner. This pole would not be set until there is approval from the State Electrical Inspector at Labor & Industries. Due to the complexities of the property, the P.U.D. would like to allow the pole and overhead service to remain for up to 18 months. During the 18 months, the owner will persue a private underground service with P.U.D. for his permanent power needs. Please advise. Thank you for meeting with me on such short notice. Sincerely, Richard Grove Senior Designer, Distribution Services 10/4/2006 Councilmember Plunkett advised City Attorney Scott Snyder was considering the revisions to the parking code with regard to RV and handicap parking and it would be returned to the Council soon. He reported the Historic Preservation Commission formed a subcommittee to consider nonconforming regulations which would be reviewed by the Community Services/Development Services Committee soon. Councilmember Plunkett reported his daughter was in graduate school at Boston University and tomorrow he would be leaving to spend seven days in Boston. He would continue to be available via email and telephone although possibly not as quickly. Councilmember Marin reported on the disabled lift installed at the Snohomish County Health District. He advised the public parking was moved to the rear of the building about six months ago where access was via 10- 12 steps. He persuaded the Finance Committee to fund the lift to improve accessibility to the Health District offices. Another success at the Health District was the administration of the Women Infant Child (WIC) program. The State approached the Health District regarding running the WIC program which the Health District was reluctant to do due to difficulties the previous administrator experienced. The Health District staff combined WIC with the First Steps program which has been very effective. He explained First Steps had a nurse and social worker who made home visits to work with young mothers; the home visits have been reduced and mothers bring their children to the Health District in conjunction with WIC. The Everett facility was remodeled to accommodate the programs and remodeling of the Lynnwood facility was recently completed. Councilmember Marin reported a Community Transit driver, Matt Chomjak, competed in the international bus driver's rodeo and won first place. He advised Mr. Chomjak had been competing for five years, the second year was the same year Councilmember Marin, also a licensed bus driver, competed in the rodeo. As a follow-up to his report on the Puget Sound Partnership last week, Councilmember Marin relayed a recommendation that the public dispose of expired prescription drugs by leaving them in the original container and disposing of them in the garbage. Councilmember Marin encouraged the public to attend the Memorial Day program at the Edmonds Cemetery on Monday at 11:00 a.m. Mayor Pro Tern Dawson reported the Council would be meeting at 6:00 p.m. on May 30 for the presentation from the Edmonds School District that the Council requested. The School Board plans to meet on June 6; therefore, it was the consensus of the Council to meet on May 30 and possibly take action. She advised the Council may also meet in Executive Session regarding a litigation matter. Council President Pro Tem Olson advised the Community Technology Advisory Committee planned to meet on May 31 at 7:00 p.m. in the Brackett Room to discuss the Wi-Fi project. 8. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:01 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes May 23, 2006 Page 7 CI �� CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 MAYOR FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org fnc.18913 January 18, 2006 Stephen C. Robinson 22030 — Ph Avenue South, #202 Des Moines, WA 98198 Subject: Request for Public Records Property Location — Meadowdale Marina aka Haines Wharf Dear Mr. Robinson: Enclosed are the records you requested regarding the above -referenced property. Sincerely, geanne Startzman Executive Assistant enclosure U: FireAdmin:Publiclnfo:Robinson • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan CITY OF EDMONDS L REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS PL96SE PRINT CL96RLY Date of Request: S A N- o to� rL Requester Name: S T Lf a"lc N C /Z o f /•c Zo,e Requester Address: 2;2o 3o - -7 `-=` Ova S , t:e Zo z. sneer c N i. ! [.✓►�i � � /� citY stets zip Phone Number. 2 co O O Request Made: [ J In Person Vtn Writing [ ] Telephone [ ] Fax BAN 1 2 2006 EDM_113 DEPT MATURE DF RE E T: (Please be ass cifi as possible with the type of information you are requesting; include address of property, file name or number, owner of property, time period, etc.): P L. "S cL- 5 L f- 1- rr-Jf CA-! 2-0�-R7p--y/00 -Z-o C - ago S-/ N/ Is the information requested a 11st,,of i Ividuals to be used for a mailing get for commercial purposes? Q Yes NW Wyes, please complete the additional f found on page 3._ C. E Page i Nature of Request: Items requested: Photographs and Video Photograph Dates: From June 1, 2005 through November 1, 2005 Subject: Meadowdale Marina aka Haines Wharf This request is for all photographs and video, which include any view of the Meadowdale Marina aka Haines Wharf. This includes photographs and video taken for unrelated purposes, including those in which a view of the Meadowdale Marina was incidentally captured. For example; on or about September 29, 2005, an Airlift Northwest rescue helicopter crashed near the marina. This sparked an extensive search and rescue effort by Edmonds Fire . Department and other agencies. It is probable that photographs and video of the marina were generated during this effort. G cn Edmonds Fire Department REQUEST FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION Fax Cover Sheet r 4C. 1 %9� Date: ,�� Number of pages (including covert' t-f To: From: A - S� 1/ �� Edmonds Fire Department 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425-771-0215 Fax Number: r _ Fax: 425-775-7721 The City of Edmonds requires that you complete the attached Request for Public Records before release of public information. Please complete the attached form and mail or retum-fax to sender at 425-775-7721. Note: If tht7equest is for a Medical Incident Report, a Medical Release Form signed by the potient/CrIent must accompany the completed "Request for Public Records." We will respond to your request for public records within five business days of the receipt of your signed Request. RCW 42.17.300 and 42.260(7) and (8) permit agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable'dtarge for providing photocopies of public records, City of Edmonds Resolution No. 1051 allows for the provision of photocopies at the following rate: Incident Reports - $5.00 per report up to five pages, 15-cents for each additional page. Thank you. The information contained in this fax transmission may be privileged, confidential, and protected from dlwtsure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this message is iftey prohibited. If you think that you received this transmission in error, please shred the pages and notify the sender at 425-771-0215 or fax at 425-7721. U.FimAdmin:H1PAA:HIPAAFixTmnsmittal.doe ot/owjws ►%[ tAls i t . I� �244•i� 447. ♦�Y" tt .� .� . � s f � t R2� � ,f ��- � ` +` r j j ^� •'� `_r�.'+ � �+G" � �t {�. i r tf: S'4c ;�% m i .. R, -s �-•L. ��, ,.,r^ "#t's •- �.� z".. x+�� r�M��� � �� � R -'Y }- F ' t•'. 'v - '' _ y, �t.a.r 4`E .Ax<'''ZY r'�..�R, .•. t �T•'.rs Fc ?s� ,� _ - r .r �•t�yh'i.�`�'+t'�R`.C� aq- t w .r- f � a; r i `n .+x^�-��.. ,,i ��� �� �-t r�y�� ?rZ ;w� ti.,,�J `(��y,C��,,;��'�'w` lr��`v� � ,r-� �+ ti f - ` � _ } �, l ,� t..,-> -S�k � ya. �-,�hi� �,�• � � �' : t4' ��" a,��`F'�TY`�.Js� c. 'nc•.,,.Y� a � � k I � a .,, t t {� ��� ��`:lty �2'�tar y�,��� I..e t� �''�cC� L}^- ° Rti i r f '& �. 11 '+: e Yr , "Ri,u• LLlV`Pr,4,4Sn{ I�� y1�"�^u -' �� t 'f �� . ti 44ye^ -z� � 3 t "t� aYy�',�• � � atae j.�d n`rs • ,,,� i1u tji`!�' `&'^ �LJ \- R iC ".��`iCf'��Z11: +�f',"`.{_tt� i[Y1� !'+•...•'�^ 7 •�`� yea rt!t � .�- �.. t +s ys t..y. .,�.,{3 .-�-+� '� Y �'!i t -,,iLtir•�S.�h,�1{� � �_ ,.a+.�J Qr`.Si fi J ,+b� ! f� ,s 'f �. ,r �. t:� .��y�4s, t��'�;��s auto., `ya�R �.,4�j uy,�.'CF�Y�.+Y"t�X'� ��� .rit'�'°At �ro"`r�J ��,� t 1# ' � .�.'g- ''Q _ f.� V � .,• S :��X�r a'` ilr "x S�+i � M � Q z� a'i z 'L 1'h'. s 'T *+"�'�. i ,2a1' :e5 k�s�7.'�.iWus' �} •;,r'� �i_f-+`.� ri+ I �ti. 1 v� •, 'Sig "" �'"'.{�-t5 �i4�yY.Y�ras✓ � + , r.. (.T}R ...' F � � �, $ � r f �rc1 .Y. �''.� &t _ �,. ., i ST t r. .- r�? � 25�.R �'t- 3 :}}r���,���.7a-e•�`3"� � ,Te Fr�'y'^ a-.' - � � - s} t• : I r ?- � w �-"�:,+:fi'�a..�'{*' lFj� ? e�•s � � f er t . 7 f � r ;:.,L + rt;+-•j �, r ��� l"�� '�t�. �!t •' t � S•� _ � � i �� L F �t �f `- 1f hha�f �24w„ y�'ts.4�i _ - • . ,. � ': i t �� I '.�T}.'`� - ' � t' °.�`- •- - . ::-1; � .t-v .._ °-l- .•vim.-;=�2 rom �-.^Fs.S"s�'��a�+?L'�'14' Ky drip 4k�.-.��t�. yjj''t•T.a "(+(Nknr. '�i0 �Ir jL fi3 �U yf- / 1 y � 4 n � eL...�--�.ly�a tU � k$1•r i .a.. ! �C-h t7rt s "Low"', 5 t! y°N�t1%� �-� 1 .+.'.l,..Jl1 ��,•,�� u.l�-:✓ r +- � �.f•w � y1s� rr �., r+.>� 1 tl� n N ���I 7�j. 'F1l ""'y ►.`.:--.r_.. ,.�-+• :°,.saw. �,rs_�.s� F. .L 'r /l ;:.l•�re.w�~-"'�+"�` ...'rl'►J:.... I 1 ,f Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:33 AM To: Graf, Jeannine Cc: Smith, Mike; Tomberg, Thomas Subject: Sundry Jeannine: Let me tell you that the Meadowdale Marina sprinkler system is still impaired and I am treating this as construction work in progress. The public is not exposed to the risk as they keep the gate locked and we've seen no activity on the pier. Smoking structures. With the additions to the Clean Air Act -we are aware of only one smoking tent in town that is in the parking lot for Stevens hospital. Permanent structures in excess of 120 s.f. require building permit, tents/temp membranes >200 s.f. require -a fire occupancy permit and will be approved/listed/labeled fire resistive just as required at the City festivals. Mike or I will likely be discussing with you as the time comes, the "temporarity" of any plans received. Stevens has a 10x10 FIR canopy and are "temporary" pending a decision to go to "smoke -free" campus. The Enterprise will have an article on the subject this week. Thanks— John John Ilot r y A I-XwM T Zia "ro I Aft '21 0 CITY OF E D M O N D S GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org Inc.189�3 December 29, 2005 Mitch Powlas Frontier Adjusters 13300 Bothell Everett Hwy., #622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 Subject: Request for Public Records Meadowdale Marina LLC Dear Mr. Powlas: Enclosed is the information you requested regarding the above -referenced property. Thank you for your advance payment of $12.35.* Sincerely, ?,anne Star zman Executive Assistant enclosure *RCW 42.17.300 and 42.260(7) and (8) permit agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing photocopies of public records. City of Edmonds Resolution No. 1051 allows for the provision of photocopies at the following rate: Incident Reports - $5.00 per report up to five pages, 15-cents for each additional page. U: FireAdmin:Pub] iclnfo:Frontier2 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sictor City - Hakinan..fanan FR TIEI JUS TER DEC 2 0 L� 2005 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. Mitch Powlas tier Adjusters of Seattle/Lynnwood 13300 Bothell Everett Hwy. tl622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 Phone (425) 337-7262 FAX (425) 316-9194 MPOWLAS@frontieradjusters.com TO Jeanne Startzman Today's December 26, 2005 Executive Assistant Date Edmonds Fire Department 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Insured Meadowdale Marina LLC Claim No 05-4670466 Carrier FRainier Insurance +Property Address 16111 76TH PL W EDMONDS, WA 98020 Property STEPANOVIC SLOBODANKA / General [VIadan Milosavljevic Owner MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC Manager- MM LLC REQUEST FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE —FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS CHECK ENCLOSED Ms. Startzman: Per your instructions I hayq�qclpsed ipy checl forte ,1.2.3,SSayable to the "Edmonds Fire Department. " I look forward to receiving the requested records. Sincerely, lk4t4 JPOV4-- Mitch Powlas Enclosures Serving the Seattle, Bellingham, Everett & Lynnwood, WA areas CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 InC.lScjO December 22, 2005 Mitch Powlas Frontier Adjusters 13300 Bothell Everett Hwy:, #622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 Subject: Request for Public Records Meadowdale Marina LLC Dear Mr. Powlas: www.edmondsfire.org We received your Request for Public Records on December 20 regarding the above - referenced property. GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The information you requested is available. The records will be released to you within five days of receipt of $12.35.* Please remit $12.35 to the Edmonds Fire Department at the above address. Please make your check payable to the Edmonds Fire Department. Thank you. Sincerely, ?anne Startzman Executive Assistant •RCW 42.17.300 and 42.260(7) and (8) permit agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing photocopies of public records. City of Edmonds Resolution No. 1051 allows for the provision of photocopies at the following rate: Incident Reports - $5.00 per report up to five pages, 15-cents for each additional page. U: FireAdmin:Publiclnfb:Frontier 0 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • C;.f— r;fi, - 14alAnan .lanan 12/20/2005 9:07 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-775-7721 PAGE: 001 OF 006 TIER. TER.S. Mitch Powlas Frontier Adjusters of SeattlelLynnwood 13300 Bothell Everett Hwy. #622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 Phone (425) 337-7262 FAX (425) 316-9194 MPOWLAS@frontleradjusters.com FACSIMILE TR9NSMITAL SHEET -NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY TO Thomas J. Tomberg, Fire Chief Today's ;December 20, 2005 Edmonds Fire Department ! Date 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds; WA 98020 Fax 9 425-775-7721 Date of Loss October 24, 2005 (Reported) i Insured Meadowdale Marina LLC Claim No 05-4670466 ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- i Carrier i Rainier Insurance I. Property i STEPANOVIC SLOBODANKA ! Owner I MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC Property 16111 76TH PL W Address i EDMONDS, WA 98020 General ; Vladan Milosavljevic Manager- ; MM LLC REQUEST FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE —FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS ALSO SENT VIA E-MAIL TO: Tomberil(i ci.edmc)jlds.wa us Chief Tomberg: Please review the attached request and let me know if you have any questions. Specifically please let me know if I have incorrectly filed this request for Public Disclosure. Sincerely, Mitch Powlas COPY Mary Bertram (Via e- Claims Manager mail) Rainier Insurance Company TO: 1411 SW Morrison ST, Suite 400 Portland, OR 97205-1945 (800) 527-7397 MBERT RAM(i redshiel d.com NOTMCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY -THE DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYINCI THIS TELECOPY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE INDTVMDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ON THIS TRANSMISSION SHEET (S). IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, BE AWARE THAT ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS INFORMATION IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TELECOPY IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE IMMEDIATELY SO THAT WE CAN ARRANGE FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AT NO COST TO YOU. 12/20/2005 9:07 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-175-7721 PAGE: 002 OF OD6 CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Date of Request: __December 20, 2005__________�,__ Requester Name: _MITCH POWLAS, Frontier Adjusters__ Requester Address: __13300 BOTHELL EVERETT HWY., PMB 622�_ street Suite(Apt. _ MILL CREEK _____WA___ ---- 98012-5314_ City State Zip Phone Number: (425) 337-7262_ Fax Number: (425) 316-9194 Request Made: [ ] In Person [ ] In Writing []Telephone [x] Fax NATURE OF REQUEST: (Please be as specific as possible with the type of information you are requesting; include address of property, file name or number, owner of property, time period, etc.): I am an insurance adiuster working on behalf of Rainier Insurance. Rainier Insurance recently wrote property insurance coverages for MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC. The address of the property is 16111 76TH PL W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98020. The Legal Description of the parcel is MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-00 - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A. A claim has been presented for damage by Meadowdale Marina LLC for property damage resulting from a burst fire- sr)rinkler line on or about October 24 2005. During the course of investigating this claim, we have learned that the oropertv may have been previously damaged in January of 2003. I have attached a copy of the correspondence received from the Building Department of the City of Edmonds. Rainier Insurance has asked my office to look into this and to make a Request For Public Disclosure for a copy of all records from the Edmonds Fire Department with respect to this property from 05/30/2001 to present Snecifically Rainier Insurance is seeking information on the circumstances of the event of January 2003 as well as whether the Fire Department Records show whether or not the fires -sprinkler line was ever reconnected after this event (01/2003) Rainier is also interested in securing color conies of anv nhotographs of the property that might have been taken by the Fire Department. Rainier Insurance understands that there may be a charge for conving these records. Please let me know the cost of copying these records and I will see that a check is sent to your offices. Owner is: STEPANOVIC SLOBODANKA / MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC Is the information requested a list of individuals to be used for a mailing list for commercial purposes? No 16 . Signature of Person Making Request Pagel 12/2D/2005 9:07 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-175-1721 PAGE: 003 OF 006 P.07/10 DEC-15-2005 12:42 Zi I =Li ruarm GAW HAAKENSON CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR weosu w*va l.edmun ftm&ua MVELOPMEW SERVICES DEPARTMENT Plan t - Building • Engineering January 31, 2003 Meadowdale Marina LLC Jim Johnson. Registered Agent 7411 190 Street Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 RE: Meadowdale Marina @ 1611176" Place West, Edmonds Dear Mr. Johnson: The purpose of this letter is to outline City requirements regrading the repair work to be performed on the Mcadowdale Marina. As you are aware, City Fire Department crews responded to a fire sprinkler flow alarm on January 25tII, 2003 and discovered a portion of the pier and heavy framed timber building on the pier, partially collapsed. City Fire and Building Officials mat with the bUrina General Manager 1VIr.1Vlilosavljevic on January 20, 2003 to view the damage and discuss the repair issues. Mr. Milosavljevic indicated drat he had the authority to speak and make decisions on behalf of the LLC. if this is not true please inform my office immediately. Given this the following is required by the City, • Contact PUD and immediately repair the stressed electrical line that services the heavy timber building. Take immediate action to protect the electrical service panels that are now exposed to the weather due to the partial building collapse. A State Electrical permit may be required to repair etc.; it is your responsibility to contact the State Labor & buiustries Everett offices for permitting requirements. Remove the abandoned fuel tank located on the westerly portion of the pier. A tank removal permit ($45) is required. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. The City Fire inspector must be on site to observe The cleaning and removal of the tank while in process 0011"Renmove the septic tank located on the east side of the pier and cap plumbing lines to and from the tank. A compliance permit ($50) is required for this work Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. Obtain a repair permit to make all necessary repairs. to the fire sprinkler system, (fee based on contractor's repair bid for the work). Obtain peraait at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • .lictarr 0hr . FtoWAa" •. anan 12/20/2005 9:07 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-775-7721 PAGE: 004 OF DD6 'le; 4J F'. Urd/ 10 Mr. Johnson January 31, 2003 Page Two Secure the pier from access via land and water within 30 days date of this letter. Removal . of ladders that allow water access to the pier and installation of "No Trespassing" signs are required. If in the hAure you decide to repair the damaged columns, piers, decking, or building, etc. you shall be required to obtain a building permit for this work. It is also highly likely that some planning permits such as Shoreline pamit, critical are review, etc. would also be required. We suggest that you schedule for a pmapplication meeting with City officials for any fid rte repairs, remode ft or re -building for this site. if you have any questions please feel five to contact me at 425-771-0220 during normal City business hours. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance for a mutually agreeable day and time as I am $equenay assisting other citizens and not always available. Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official 1I& b itvsavljevio, 23423 Brier Road, Brier, WA 98036 12/2D/2005 9:07 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-775-7721 PAGE: D05 OF 006 DEC-15-2005 12:47 P.09i10 — u IT PlRY CITY OF EDMONDS � NUMBER 'D CONSMCTION PERMIT APPLICATION w1NEe fMINIM 4�>�N r uc l N. ° as irO lA FEE s wtaslo AOO�® �, IWlIG AIONr OF WAY !EA OFFICIAL FTNEEr Opt' Fu.N ON pma Wv am 10 TEIIPXONE E:esnua RFODUtID OLICAT04 PROPOS'0D rT N/YE xE7ER EIEE W4E exL NO. OF nxTvma Fit, mm"ID _ rsec NO G bowm AENIAMIS M/IIFr.R N®PDNSuma FOR ER080N fit__ R/ "F M AEYIAYA4a Illy— _- DATE :Iry rn reEFNoaE wJ11AAYYORcu � ' Iv6WE" Ows ONO ro Teo e ITAM UOENEE NNxa9l OXiCNiO n gm acvaN+ °,xl� OEM" A"Ww FWOF07EO "low ALLOWED RRK)"M Q NQW Q AODRICVI Q © NEMM n at%.o�E Q AeaDErrt1A Q MIRABTW/AV1G11 �COMAIERCUI ❑ ommialliopum Q .opTwMtr ©eqN U aWlDaKl cry C3 �� {"� ANoWA�{ © Mmm A66a r� ED R " aNw°�aa KS �mm Umia FMgMO lOf AIW REOD vlaWDCO I It.NiNMO AlWOWlD BY DATE REl1ARltl 77 QRo.m NYNDE%°F / OlmN:a OOouFAAn ONE111ND j! J ANEAE /�� iRQILU/�ECTON IAAe utore '�/ NuxDER /r R4auRm 0 m, now �PAO�RE89 WSPE01'ION6 PER U06 t0&FWAL ddiP[CRON RE09 r J /JmS 1 $ I 1 Dual t n I FEE 1040WOM I PU PW CJtralc 0— &-,W EO HEAT some OIAAMO { LOrXon % P n i � � SIRd41(EA w PLM GO" Na VUTW DA7 PYarbft -- 11NOrE1aE11�atnora.Eal%rra woANNorm AW FtAMR eornawonN gum"(ONIut,emoeAuo,maeroa'e.rl ce, nagME4REaOWfwI11111MA/rNCaOaR INOM PEW wum I mm-MOYIDE Ills 1 tE1<IEIIROMRMIx 1NDAYSF 1EB OI1 NER Erouee. AWKINE AM WMIKIR qN D%WWANrANliwt Plan CMS O"ll fiFlkr*�Rww— Rsrxlpl E WNCtOr NOt a Mo_.C_ of rMS PRW"N0 t"wWWTOTIK � TOWAmLOt»Oee®m M 00/ OUPNiWANOsOMtwits F Awee OP twpaPK NAAws oR Aeouce AAx NAOtAAPODt* ar AWqIY OAONgICPEa Rac0ipl /APPLICATION APPROVAL OWEN IB ODMM, AND IIMT I AM THE OMK OR SIZE OW A ITHORII0 ADENT r11E OWNER. tAO U ro 0WWVAm om AND srAM V" eeauurro OGOINrAw I. .p.nm4m"PW orTM AHD N 0=0 slut AunW=1MEREEK N° ►G M 1" eE ExROYLL` R GWg THE ETAIE OF W WWWOM PIP ATWO EuDr,Eas n0�" FP+PoAI ,r W4 u tla �ws�ofar10i0. vOlAlallo'rryE OF awAAllKIE AM 4W UK OA79 EIONED Zm m S {p� 7 711-02Z0 . AEIEAEED a A EXT 1333 IT M UNLAWFUL TO YOB OR OCCUPY A BIJ LOM OR STRUCTURE LNUL A FINAL 1NSP99T10N NAS BUM MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CBRT(FI- ONUML • FILE , reu°N • N4 WOR CATL OF OCCUPANCY HAS BM aAANTBA U8C U=QN 101 MM • OwNeA OOtA • ADWAO R 04M PRPRQ MORn Vnl I AMP MaKIWF= A f!PIOEFC ORFEN.AMIJI MIG • • 12/20/2005 9:07 AN FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters ' TO: 425-775-7721 PAGE: 006 OF 006 DEC-15-2005 12:47 P.10i10 • W.6ENE _.-- �[ p@3 pA�aTE76 u Pap=T /1Y/+jJQ� TY OF EDMONDS NIIMea�► 7 CTION PERAAITAPP�ICATION A��DREea � �""'FA �1 /� / f '�� R, i'i A �wh�-I pZ0 weµ W N a wn AlmUa Re E AIpMT M, orl a,L en+Eer MAr rMZPV4 E P"�efi16R 66� LeIL 8IH W. M FRT — ►RV R/.amCe I �O rta0 No D EIts "tin" .R..YM�a�ullYClen RT,TEMmlE FOR umm comet lm-w E .— al NA"E M(GO E AODR1aee%/ 11 2 K O'h g; QA %w ® "A eiuum ❑ ,� ❑ mom 0.7Amv❑ 0 ❑ sorP REIMIR aIV1Til+a f ❑ ,YOa m= In, ❑ O �TAMR ❑ 7r11W DST HAMWMOGWAU ❑� Lett of Pea E cRu-mm e_."K, 0 i-,)-";r0? III LOT OOVeRAOO eEGU6iED LCTLAaa irU rRWOa0 S91eAoYe M. ALLOWED /NaC F:10eT BDI REM FROMT LrKam WAR FARKM I for AREA .MNIAMe RSVW#FP DATE tvmlllR'M•lOTIC m¢aurlEu 13 we a IrCAT tiOVRCC -- - - ou�nMa . SOT aton w 81a 0 YeYma PLAN CHECK NO: . MTEO WrE PNrE�k>9 AREdwn6wl 7WTE&=Q■Wm mWTo woo" Err om1011lILYiOr awma rVetl6 VOrAM $OI/Ve• IM10tl.�a4ma VW, RWM eOYlRA7a rerrrTAPELE000M 7W am ►um"W"I reM-PA .NpWMETAgOERYI01 mom" EAOE. Cqxwml e¢ rROY dt Rerl EeR11it rOrMORr arORYKlltll •A►RIOANL ON K Wf OF Me on maileIOW; IREY, AaegNS ANO pIGOEWN i7N Kean'!,, pq IR�Qf" aP eRON AOReie 76 ftft E►Y OWW O AM NERr ilARl4Ete 7Me CM OF wm&wa. lAROrpN6TaN. fTa o/ROIMA QPWMREe, AM A50" FM ANY NIO AIL CIM1ta rOR OAWWEOOF D RA7WF AR1MYap%WmORffWmcW Uv&coW In* FwOM THE W. MDE Or Two pm%m ulslwrms OF 7Nfe repWT t"L\tl own OMIM TO IMOM MUK OR MOM ANY 126M 1CM OF AW on pimmANCe TO MOE NN ORWNAIR;F WOVCBiON.' RecadrlB fee NOR UMW ANY VW "W CAYS AMM DW 1 "Mpf NXNOMEOU TART I MAVE REDO Pa IOFNCRil010 TNAT TL W "W MM A aMN Fi OOIMEOC Afro HILT P Ar X oYa k OR TA DYW AWIORItfio AGM Or TIE OmTL r AOIEEfi cave RdM COY 00 VIA71 Wq 11L61AA1oro Cm1a11UG TCok Arm INOM Dow Twwom THMM Ma F'ERBOr VAL W E"FIOYED or rASMaEoraN ReuWwo re Cam' aiaPIUMN ewas�o N V roe OF woR coot OF Tm rat e ell E AM ROw ILW. FOR �A�\•,.. . AamEl) t ORTa IWO S TT14= I:xr 1333 REWOO A oN R Mt I aA aw r rn I nw. Ytm AMkW A Rt m OM CM STHDMM UNTIL 1 smm 8udwae PWT ('.M. oEPo TdW ArEL Due TOTAL P.10 Meadowdale Marina owner to appeal city ruling on plan By Jim Hills _ Ente rise writer 13 e Despite getting the go- ahead to rebuild one of the last boathouses on Puget Sound, Milo Milosavljevic says he will appeal the Edmonds Hearing Examiner's decision giving that approval. we will start the appeal process," Milosavijevic said recently. Milosavljevic said he is gen- eral manager of Meadowdale Marina, U C with his wife, Slo- bodanka Stepanovic, as owner. I provide the work and she provides the funds," he said. Together, he said, the cou- ple wants to rebuild Meadow - dale Marina, also known his- torically as Haines Wharf at 1611176th Place W. The marina includes a large metal building for stor- ing boats rests on concrete pil- ings and decking, while an adjacent wooden building sits on timber pilings. While the concrete and metal portion is in good shape, the wood half of the facility is in disrepair, with large areas of planks and pilings missing. I love boats and want to be on the water," Milosavljevic said. "I want to keep it the way it is, so people can fish and have recreation." To do that, Milosavljevic's plans call for replacing approx- imately 277 wooden pilings with about 230 concrete pil- ings. To install the new con- crete pilings, Milosavljevic wants to replace half of the wooden pilings, slide the wooden building over, replace the other half of the pilings and slide it back. The problem with that plan, according to Hearing Examin- er Ron McConnell's decision, is city code says any move- ment of a "nonconforming" building requires the building to be torn down. While there were once numerous such boathouses around Puget Sound, the fact that all of the facility, built in 1939, is over the water makes it nonconforming and would- n't be allowed under present building codes, McConnell wrote in his decision. /Y1/'�R�N A 'CIA uments filed with the city say it is one of the few such Continued from page 4 A2m d mg sties on Puget McConnell noted that there Along with boat storage appears to be conflicting city and launching facilities, he codes. But the more restrictive said, "We still have a couple of of two is required to be used, boats to rent. Besides boats, he wrote. well have a (fishing) tackle "We think we can move the shop and some small parts for building to repair the dock, the boats. Milosavljevic said. "Ibe city "We may also have a little and the hearing examiner Portion for a dive shop. There think we can't is a really good big huge rock "So we appeal." underwater, from what I've Some neighbors have heard from divers, 300.400 voiced concerns over Milosavl- Yards away They like to go jevic's plans. there." ' Pip I Ruggiero, who Milosavljevic said that lives near the marina, said in a while historical photos show letter to the city that he thinks traffic jammed in the area, the Milosavljevic may have some rebuilt pier will have parking thing else in mind beyond for 200 cars. Plans call for cap. restoring a boathouse. tang runoff and separating "Whereas it is not my role out any oil before it goes back to question the wisdom of this in the Sound. . investment, it appears that the Another neighborhood resi- ultimate objective for the use dent, John Quast, said he and Of this property may not be his wife, Lori, complained to apparent or clearly defined ..." the city about unauthorized Ruggiero wrote. work at the marina. McConnell's decision "Were not opposed to the makes a point of noting that marina being rebuilt, we're any new use or construction opposed to them dropping would have to go through city, debris in the water," John state and federal reviews. Quast said. Milosavljevic said he has no McConnell noted that a ulterior motive and just wants stoP-work order had been to restore what once was a issued and that any potential thriving business. Project doe fines would be up to city offi- cials. . OWN Smith, Mike From: Smith, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:47 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina 11-15-05 pics This is a follow up to the previous Marina e-mail. -----Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:25 AM To: Highland, Scott Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina 11-15-05 pics Check out the belly in the fire line. -----Original Message-----! IM000502.jpg (347 KB) MT Message Page 1 of 1 Smith, Mike From: Smith, Mike Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:00 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Cc: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina The Fire Department will require as builts for the damaged and repaired sprinkler piping. Permits will be required for repairing the fire line and the damaged portion of the sprinkler system. This can be lumped together in one permit. Prior to occupancy we will need: 1) Verification that the fire line to the building is repaired, on and functional. 2) Annual certifications from a licensed sprinkler contractor on both the dry and wet automatic sprinkler systems that they are functional. 3) Work must be done by a licensed sprinkler contractor regarding repairs to the wet system on the piping that broke when a portion of the building and pier collapsed. 4) The sprinkler system requires monitoring off site. I am sure other things will come up. I will advise if we add or delete to the above requirements. -----Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:45 AM To: Smith, Mike Cc: DST Subject: Meadowdale Marina Mike Besides a scope of work and bid --what schematics/details, etc. will you want for the Meadowdale Marina fire sprinkler repair work? Thanks JLG 12/20/05 NOTICE TO REPAIR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SERVICING THE BUILDINGS ARE IN NEED OF REPAIR BY ORDER OF THE CITY FIRE MARSHAL DATED November 16, 2005 UNDER SECTION 901 OF THE 2003 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON OR PERSONS TO OCCUPY OR USE THESE BUILDINGS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM HAS BEEN REPAIRED UNDER THE PROPER PERMIT AND TESTED AND INSPECTED APPROVED BY THE CITY FIRE MARSHAL ADDRESS OF VIOLATION 16111 76TH Place West, Edmonds DEPARTMENT OF FIRE CITY OF EDMONDS S CITY FIRE MARSHAL ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON REMOVING THIS SIGN WILL BE PROSECUTED By order of the Building Official for the City of Edmonds All persons Are Ordered to STOP WORK AT ONCE Address: apta ;%1*AL weir Property Owner (if known):____ Contractor (if known): We are unable to locate a valid permit for the work being done at this address. A permit is required for this project. Work SHALL NOT continue until a permit has been obtained and the work inspected for conformance with applicable codes and ordinances. If you have already obtained the permit, please contact us at (425) 771-0220 with the permit number so we can revise our records. An application must be submitted or a response in writing must be made to our office no later than 4:00 pm on A VIOLATION FEE EQUAL OR UP TO FIVE TIMES THE PERMIT FEE SHALL, BE ASSESSED. Posted this/6 day of A ?a-g-VX Building Official WarninV,: The failure to stop this work or activity and/or the resuming of work without permission or the removal, mutilation, or concealment of this Notice is punishable by fine and imprisonment. City of Edmonds Development Services Department Building Division 121 5"' Ave N • Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 Office flours M-F 9-12 and 1-4 Smith, Mike From: Smith, Mike Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 12:13 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina The Fire Sprinkler System for the buildings on the pier are disabled because part of fire line has separated due to dock collapse. Pumping into the FDC if a fire occurs on the pier would be of no value other than training. The City will be posting the structure to Stop Work and fix and restore the Fire Sprinkler/Fire Line System. Now would be a good time to review our SOP 102.18 on responses and actions to calls at Meadowdale Marina. FYI October 30, 2005 Herald 7 (a _ P� irk ethic gLuded former Edmonds businessman �AT�F77 KICKER BOATS PER TRIP 4". MOTOR BOATS Isr HOUR 4350 EAfH ADDITT. HOUR 11 fs ght) stands with his brother, Herb Haines, at Haines ' on the Edmonds waterfront. The family ran the busi- 39 until 1970. Jim Haines died Oct. 31. Alva Fero )m on January 6, ney; Nova Scotia, lian and Fred Fero. ,av on October 26. BY JuuE MuH s'rEIN Herald Writer Long before Jim Haines be- came a county commissioner, or county assessor, or an Edmonds City Council member, his name was already well known in south Snohomish County. From 1939 until 1970, the family name was part of the Edmonds landscape. With his father, the late H.F. Haines, and his brother, Herb Haines, Jim Haines owned and operated Haines Fishing Wharf, a sport fishing business that pro- vided tackle .and rental boats to generations of anglers. James Brownfield Haines died Oct.11. He was 85. He is survived by three children, Maggie Haines of Seattle, Bill Haines of Lacey, and James "Diggs" Haines of Bux- ton, Maine; and by siblings Herb Haines and Francine Mills. He was preceded in death by his wife, Margaret Helen Haines. Political colleagues, lifelong friends, former employees and his children remember Haines as hard-working, fair and unfailing- ly honest. "He was the most honest man we all knew," Jiggs Haines said Monday at a memorial gathering for his father at Anthony's Home - port restaurant on the Edmonds waterfront. Jiggs Haines said his late moth- er told the children: "He was nev- er going to be your buddy, he was only going to be your father. He was not only my father, he was our employer." Maggie Haines recalled her fa- ther lining the children up on Sat- urday nights for "merits and de- merits" to determine whether they got their allowance. All three children worked at the wharf business, which in its hey- day had 100 rental boats. The business employed many other local teens as well. Jim Haines called them "dock boys." "I'm still kind of a dock boy," said Roger Brown of Edmonds, who worked at the wharf as a kid. "I still love being around the wa- ter." .From his boss, he said, he learned to "do the best job you can.,, Jim Haines lived by that ethic through his business life and lat- er as a public official. Herb Haines said his brother sold the wharf, which is now abandoned, in 1970 in part be- cause of changes in environmen- tal laws and the growth of private boat ownership. The wharf was depicted in the 1994 Edmonds Arts Festival poster, a watercolor by artist Su- sanWaite. By the time Haines sold the wharf, he was already on the Ed- monds, Planning Commission. In 1967, Gary Nelson, now a Sno- homish County Council mem- ber, defeated Haines in a race for Edmonds City Council. When a vacancy came up on the City Council, Haines was so highly respected that he was ap- pointed to the seat, Nelson said. Haines. was later appointed Snohomish County assessor, then was elected to another term as assessor before successfully running for Snohomish County commissioner. The commission was replaced by the County Council through a change to a charter form of gov- ernment. "Jim was an example of what a public official should be. He worked hard and was not afraid to make decisions," Nelson said. Nelson acknowledged that when he had ideas about govern- ment expenditures, Haines would caution him, saying, "Now, Gary, this is not your money." Haines also contributed to the community as a founding mem- ber of the Stevens Hospital board in Edmonds, and as pres- ident of the Rotary Club of Lynn- wood. ?. Raised in Seattle's Queen Anne Hill neighborhood, Haines grad- uated from Whitman College in Walla Walla, where he met his wife. He served in the Coast Guard during World War Il. Buddies from his college fra- ternity, Beta Theta Pi, became friends for life. Three of them, Jack Saad of Spokane, Ed McMil- lan of Poulsbo and Fay Garner of Bothell, all attended the me- morial. "We roomed together for three years and worked in the kitchen together," McMillan said. "We had a 67-year friendship, and we talked every week, all those years." Mildred Bigford, whose chil- dren grew up with the Haineses' children, said Jim Haines had a fun side. "He was a rather strict father, but very loving. I have so many memories. He loved shooting off fireworks from their front deck on the Fourth of July," Bigford said. She and Jiggs laughed at the time Haines took a pet monkey in trade for some fishing tackle. He brought the monkey home, but after a year or so returned the messy critter to the customer. Later, Jiggs Haines spotted the same monkey in another fishing store. His father, Jiggs Haines said, "taught us service and honesty." Nelson, the County Council member, said Haines "set an ex- ample for a lot of people." JulieMuhlstein: 425-339-3450 or muhWeinjulie@heraldnet.com. Paula J. Shramek Paula J. Shramek passed away Thursday morning, October 27, 2005. Paula was born July r. 10Q9 M Tk-l-, ....4 C-1 I CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org I,1 c g4z0 August 15, 2005 Diana Phelan Herrera Environmental Consultants 2200 — 6'" Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Request for Public Records Location: Meadowdale Marina T611`�1 — 75th Avenue West' Edmonds, WA 98024T Dear Ms. Phelan: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Enclosed is the information that you requested regarding the above -referenced property. Thank you for your payment of $15.45'. _ Sincerely, Jeanne Startzman Executive Assistant enclosure 'RCW 42.17.300 and 42.260(7) and (8) permit agencies such as cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing photocopies of public records. City of Edmonds Resolution No. 1051 allows for the provision of photocopies at the following rate: Incident Reports - $5.00 per report up to five pages, 15-cents for each additional page. C: Fire Marshal Westfall • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • c;�+o� city - Hekinan. Jaoan U: FireAdmin: Publ icl nfo: Herrera 3 7-1 E CITY OFDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondstire.org In c 18°/"i August 3, 2005 Diana Phelan Herrera Environmental Consultants 2200 — 6"' Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Request for Public Records Location: Meadowdale Marina 16111 — 7e Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98024 Dear Ms. Phelan: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The Edmonds Fire Department has the documents ready that you requested regarding the above -referenced property. The report will be released to you within five days of receipt of $15.45*. Please remit $15.45 to the above address. Please make your check payable to the Edmonds Fire Department. Thank you. Sincerely, Jeanne Startzman Executive Assistant *RCW 42.17.300 and 42.260(7) and (8) permit agencies such as. cities to impose a reasonable charge for providing onds lution No. photocopies at the following rate: pies of public Incident Reportsrds. City of - $5.00 per port up to051 allows for the five pages, 5-centsforion of each additional page. C: Fire Marshal Westfall Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan. Japan U: FireAdmin: Publicl nfo: HerreW CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT Established 1904 www.edmondsfire.org 1hc.1So%3 July 27, 2005 Diana Phelan Herrera Environmental Consultants 2200 — 6t' Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Request for Public Records Location: Meadowdale Marina 16111 — 75"' Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98024 Dear Ms. Phelan: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter acknowledges receipt of your request for public records dated July 25, 2005. Due to the volume of documents requested, additional time is needed to respond. It is anticipated documents will be available for your review on or before August 15,_ 2005. Please be aware that there is a charge for copies: Copies: First five pages free - 15¢ charge for each additional page Maps: $2.00 to $5.00 per sheet depending on size Sincerely, ?eanne Startzman Executive Assistant C: Fire Marshal Westfall U: FireAdmin:Publiclnfo:Herrera • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Citv - Hekinan. Japan JUL-25-2005 11:56 FROM-HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS T-509 P-002/002 F-809 CITY OF EDMONDS REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Date of Request: - a5 -05 Requester Name: 7 Requester Address: Smoot � 1 x, LA) Ar city Stato zip Phone Number: �� I 0 al)�1 0 Request Made: [ J In Person [ } In Writing [)Telephone R Fax NATURE OF REQUEST: (Please be as sic as possible with the type of information you are requesting; include address of property, file name or number, owner of property, time period, etc.): t . A A C/L Q r% Ow &(\o h o Cz . W c�- 4a)g, Ylr. mac. t T�aa � R n d .1 Is the in, "list of individuals to be used for a mailing list for f 0 %rm ion requested a commercial purposes? Ci Yes 2%No If yes, please complete the additional form found on pag3. of person Making Request Page 1 JUL-25-2005 11:56 FROM-HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS T-509 P.001/002 F-609 cm:M4 HERRERA EN"cav°SLX i `$ DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL Delivery Method: [E FAX ❑ U.S. Mail ❑ Local Courier ❑ FedEx/Special Delivery ❑ Hand Delivery Faxed number of Pages including cover _2 Faxed Original ❑ will ❑ will not be forwarded to you Project Number: C04-02698-016 Transmittal Number: Date: July 25.2005 Subject, .Re uest for ublic records Meadowdale Marina Pro ert , Edmonds, WA To: From: City of :Edmonds Fire Department Diana Phelan d helan@herteraine.com) —' Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Seattle, Washington 99121 Fax (206) 441-9108 (206) 441-9080 Phone Number: Fax Number: 425-775-7721 Attached are the following items: City of Edmonds, Request for Public Records form Remarks: Requesting if there are any former or existing records/permits issued (including hazardous waste records, hazmat incident reports, underground or aboveground storage tanks [permitted or removal of tanks]) for the following property: Nleadowdale Marina property (formerly Haines fishing wharf) 16111 75`i' Avenue West, Edmonds, WA 98024 Snohomish County parcel tax no.: 00513900100700 Copies to: By: dp ,,; prwvu-a�60d-OlA4L,pr tr!)dax• � ��w`.«Lnrnd•p�r II,.c.Uur / 6 / / t 76 rt, id Tomberg, Thomas From: Gebert, David Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:49 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stern, David; Gannon, Gerald; Compaan, Al; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Haakenson, Gary; Hepler, Patrick; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: PIJAQ emergency work tonight at Hanelsiwharf Tom, Thank you. Yes, the PUD is well aware of the deteriorated condition of the wharf. Dave -----Original Message ---- From: Tomberg, Thomas . Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:55 PM To: Gebert, David; Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stern, David; Gannon, Gerald; Compaan, Al; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Haakenson, Gary; Hepler, Patrick; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf 6/9/05 David, Not that I am aware of; however, this structure is in a very advanced state of deterioration. Any work from the structure itself could prove very dangerous. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:50 PM To: Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stem, David; Gannon, Gerald; Compaan, Al; Tomberg, Thomas; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Subject: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf I have just been contacted by the PUD about some emergency work they plan to do tonight (about 3:00 AM) at Hanes wharf in Meadowdale. They have some pole mounted transformers on a pole that is supported by some very deteriorated portions of the wharf. They are concerned about the pole or portions of the wharf failing and the transformers falling into the water. So they have a barge coming into tonight to remove the transformers. They contacted me for approval to install a temporary replacement electrical service above ground rather than underground as the code would require a permanent service to be. They are coordinating with BNSF (to work in vicinity of railroad right of way) and LU My question for all of you is ..... Are there any other approvals they need from the City to bring in a barge and work from it in the vicinity of Hane's wharf tonight? Sorry for the short notice. Dave Tomberg, Thomas To: Gannon, Gerald Subject: RE: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf Thanks Gerry; Pat Hepler is the duty BC; he is letting Station 14 know as they are first -in. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Gannon, Gerald Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 4:47 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Gebert, David; Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stem, David; Compaan, Al; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Haakenson, Gary; Hepler, Patrick; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf I advised Snocom. Gerry -----Original Message ----- From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:55 PM To: Gebert, David; Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stern, David; Gannon, Gerald; Compaan, Al; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Haakenson, Gary; Hepler, Patrick; Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf 6/9/05 David, Not that I am aware of; however, this structure is in a very advanced state of deterioration. Any work from the structure itself could prove very dangerous. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Gebert, David Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 3:50 PM To: Chave, Rob; Bullock, Steve; Mcintosh, Brian; Stern, David; Gannon, Gerald; Compaan, Al; Tomberg, Thomas; Bowman, Duane; Chrisman, Lyle; Fiene, Don; McConnell, Jeanie; Graf, Jeannine Subject: PUD emergency work tonight at Hane's wharf I have just been contacted by the PUD about some emergency work they plan to do tonight (about 3:00 AM) at Hanes wharf in Meadowdale. They have some pole mounted transformers on a pole that is supported by some very deteriorated portions of the wharf. They are concerned about the pole or portions of the wharf failing and the transformers falling into the water. So they have a barge coming into tonight to remove the transformers. They contacted me for approval to install a temporary replacement electrical service above ground rather than underground as the code would require a permanent service to be. They are coordinating with BNSF (to work in vicinity of railroad right of way) and L&I. My question for all of you is ..... Are there any other approvals they need from the City to bring in a barge and work from it in the vicinity of Hane's wharf tonight? Sorry for the short notice. Dave Tomberg, Thomas To: Highland, Scott Cc: Fire Dept Group Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marine 7/7/04 Thanks Scott. I appreciate the update, and will send the status of the A/S System (still off) at Meadowdale Marina to Fire Group. Please continue to keep us informed. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Highland, Scott Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:17 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marine Hello Tom, This is just a status report on an old issue that Mike and I have been trying to get settled. Basically just a F.Y.I. Sounds like you are wearing extra hats with John & Mike away. Call if you have any questions, Thanks, Scott Highland (Water Div.) -----Original Message ----- From: Highland, Scott Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 11:07 AM To: Westfall, John Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marine Hello John, We met with the owner (Milo?) of Meadowdale Marine this morning to turn on the fireline after his repairs. We had to shut it off again due to a leak at one of his valves on the dock. Says he will call us back when he has it repaired. Thought that you might like to know. He seems a bit slow at getting things fixed so I'll let you know when I do. Thanks, Scott Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:04 AM To: Smith, Mike; Graf, Jeannine Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina'! 6111 76th Place W I didn't ask for a permit because the demolition of the old building would have eliminated one entire system. However, the building is only one half demolished and will require a permit for the piping work and thermal protection. We concur. John -----Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:04 PM To: Graf, Jeannine; Westfall, John Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina If I recall John sent something out regarding the FS system. He is out right now but will return this afternoon. Let's get him involved, also -----Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:58 AM To: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina Mike The fire sprinkler permit application expires today. Are we requiring him to obtain this permit? If so, I will need to issue an Order to Correct to force him to obtain the permit and make the repairs. Do you concur? Graf -----Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:48 AM To: Graf, Jeannine Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina -----Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:52 AM To: Smith, Mike; Snook, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina I need your assistance in updating the file on Milo: By letter dated 1/31/03 he was required to: • Contact PUD and immediately repair the stressed electrical line that services the heavy timber building. (unknown if this has been done) Done, and temp service installed • Take immediate action to protect the electrical service panels that are now exposed to the weather due to the partial building collapse. A State Electrical permit may be required to repair etc.; it is your responsibility to contact the State Labor & Industries Everett offices for permitting requirements. (unknown if this has been done)It appears no power is in the building panels, just the temp service on the dock. • Remove the abandoned fuel tank located on the westerly portion of the pier. A tank removal permit ($45) is required. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. The City Fire Inspector must be on site to observe the cleaning and i removal of the tank while in process. (permit issued, work done and approved) Concur • Remove the septic tank located on the east side of the pier and cap plumbing lines to and from the tank. A compliance permit ($50) is required for this work. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. (permit issued unknown if work done) I believe the tank has been removed. • Obtain a repair permit to make all necessary repairs to the fire sprinkler system, (fee based on contractor's repair bid for the work). Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. (filed for permit not yet issued) Unknown • Secure the pier from access via land and water within 30 days date of this letter. Removal of ladders that allow water access to the pier and installation of "No Trespassing" signs are required. (unknown if this has been done) Unknown Let me know what you know. Thanks Graf Jeannine L. Graf Building Official City of Edmonds Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 1:50 PM To: Bullis, Ann Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina,1`61411 75th PI W Milo was in this day with his architect and engineer to discuss fire protection and, access issues for the future marina development. Regarding fire access: Milo wishes to "overbuild rather than underbuild". The existing property appears to have been sprinklered due to lack of required access. Milo discussed considerations for providing access to the pier. I indicated the live loads must accommodate our fire apparatus and the width of the causeway must be minimum 20'. If access is "provided, using the former logic, the building would not require a sprinkler system UNLESS the new occupancy might require it. Being proposed are replacing wood with steel columns and providing a concrete deck for a noncombustible pier. Shoreline management/property upgrade issues are well in the spotlight. `Regarding fire protection: Hopefully the corroded, leaky portion of the existing sprinkler system came down with the old building. There is an encapsulated.8" line that has never frozen (to my knowledge) for fire suppression purposes. No pedestrian/firefighter access would be provided around the exterior due to seaside coverage from ? A standpipe would be a reasonable accommodation whether access is provided or not. John Fire Department notes: Requirements from UFC 902.2.1 Access and ECDC 19.65 Marinas. Check NFC and other standards if plans make it that far. v Date: March 11, 2003 To: Building Department From: John Westfall, Fire Marshal Subject: PC #03-079 Meadowdale Marina Demolition 16111 76th PI W. The Fire Department has approved subject plans with, corrections. The following comments and corrections are provided: 1. Maintain vehicular access area from 75th Place to the foot of pier on 761h Place for the purpose of Fire Department apparatus access. 2. Maintain clear access to fire hydrant East of RR crossing and water utilities vault for fire suppression use. 3. Maintain a 3' clear path to beach for workers during demolition and firefighters for use in case of emergency. Gate may be secured to prevent unwanted personnel from walking on pier. 4. Provide portable fire extinguishers on -site for ready use. Extinguishers should be minimum 2A:10B:C rated and spaced no greater than 75' from demolition operations. 5. Provide afire watch who will be dedicated to reporting any fire problems to 9-1-1. A means of communication for reporting an emergency is required. 6. Remove combustible debris often. Do 'not allow debris to accumulate. 7. A "doghouse" will be constructed around existing fire sprinkler riser. Inside temperatures must be maintained at 40 degrees F. or greater. Cap demolished sprinkler system at a point inside sprinkler doghouse. 8. Automatic sprinkler system for remaining structure must be placed back into service for Fire Department sign -off of demolition project. 1 Cc: Mr. Milosavljevic, 23423 Brier Road, Brier, WA 98036 Mr. Jim `ohnson, 7411 196th Street SW, Lynnwood, WA 98036 City of Edmonds * Office of Fire Marshal Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:52 PM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th Place W Members: I've approved plans and permit for the demolition of the 11,200 s.f. wood -framed structure on the pier at Meadowdale Marina. Work must be complete within 6 months. Demolition safety comments were provided with consideration to Meadowdale Marina Tactical Plan SOP 102.18. The status of the sprinkler system(s) are still "impaired". John Westfall, John From: Smith, Mike Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:04 AM To: Bullis, Ann; Graf, Jeannine; Westfall, John; Snook, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th PI W met Milo at the marina yesterday. The old gas tank, pump, and piping have been removed. A temporary power service is in place. 1 And as a reminder, even when the dock is dry it is still treacherous walking out there. 7 A- EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT SOP 102.18 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2003 MEADOWDALE MARINA TACTICAL PLAN INTENT To establish emergency response procedures and resource support in the event of a fire or - other emergency on the piers at the Meadowdale Marina, Grid 507, 16111 76th Place West. 19M*1&M[61i•1 Meadowdale Marina, previously known as.Laebugten Wharf or Haines Wharf, is in a state of disrepair and continuing deterioration. It is dangerous not only because of recent neglect, but - also due to the adjacent double tracks of the Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railway Company, its status as an attractive nuisance, and public use of a private crossing to access the beach. Presently, the marina has only liability insurance, no fire insurance. The outside decking is very slippery, although. planking inside the structure is in relatively good shape. The newer section, a metal building with concrete'deck, is in good shape. No portions of the structure will support the weight of emergency vehicles or apparatus. The owner reports plans to clean the premises and upgrade the deck and the wooden structure. Until further notice, strategic and tactical plans for emergency response to Meadowdale Marina appear below. STAFFING AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Safety. - Establish safety watches immediately —both north and south track watches with radios and lights (at night). - Request additional resources as required. Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies. Handle all non -fire emergencies by following normal procedures with some exceptions: All personnel must wear personal floatation devices (PFDs) while working on the pier. �. At least one member will be assigned with hand lights toilluminate the path leading to the emergency scene, and the incident scene itself, at night.., Focus apparatus and vehicle lights; and adjustable spotlights on access routes and the scene to provide additional illumination. Fire Response, Smoke Investigation, Sprinkler Waterflow Alarm. - Limit the number ofpersonnel assigned to investigate the incident. - Personnel must wear PFDs and carry SCBAs, forcible entry tools, and one or more pump cans. - Carry additional hand lights due to dark areas inside the warehouses. Page 1 of 6 . ,1,, • . ' •;.:`.. =. 1. SOP 102.18 t TACTICAL CdNSIDERATIONS iZr. - ti>:.: Medical Aid and Rescue Emergencies. No apparatus or vehicle will be driven onto -the pier under any circumstance. Due to the uneven surface, a gurney will not easily ,., traverse the pier to transfer a patient to an Aid or Medic Unit. For this reason, if not on the dispatch, request SNOCOM send an Engine Company for staffing assistance... Fire Response, Smoke Investigation, Sprinkler Waterflow Alarm. No apparatus or �- vehicles will be driven onto the pier under any circumstance. Crews discovering a ~. broken sprinkler water main will shut -down the system at the foot valve located just east of the railroad tracks, or in the sprinkler riser room, located in the southeast corner of the wood frame warehouse. Crews withdraw from the pier when fires cannot be contained by portable fire extinguishers, and summon additional resources. • ConfiroW Large Fire. Arriving crews will not stretch attack lines out onto the pier in an attempt o fight a large fire. All responding units standby on 75th Place until tactical assigrtments are given. Ladder-2O backs down the driveway and sets up a water tower operation. The Incident Command directs SNOCOM to request: ° - ESCA (425-776-3722). US Coast Guard (206-442-7070). The Coast Guard will act in a liaison and resource procurement role, but will bring no fire -fighting capability. -- Seaftle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center (206-490-2965). Seattle will respond if available. - Kingston Marine 81 from North Kitsap Fire and Rescue #10 via Kitsap CenCom (360-308-5400). Direct SNOCOM to notify the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (1- ti 800-832-5452, 206-625-6362) of the fire and traffic in the Meadowdale Marina Crossing (MP 217.26). Request the Utility package so PUD can cut power to the pier. • Master Stream Operations. Ladder 20 takes their own supply using the fire hydrant at ` the base of the driveway. After Ladder 20 is in place, an Engine backs down the -,.. driveway and lays a Monitor Reverse (SOP 302.02 Hose Evolutions, page 8) to the nearest hydrant at 162"d and 751h Place West. This Engine ties into the sprinkler connection, and initiates ground monitor operations, if necessary. In its current condition, the sprinkler system's viability is unknown. It may be used until it is repaired, although.the effectiveness on a fire remains questionable. Activate the C automatic sprinklers by opening the stem and yoke valve in the vault, or by pumping into the FDC. Fire Prevention will advise when the system is back in service. f :. Call Back Resources. Because this operation is staff intensive, and requires many hours to mitigate, an Edmonds Engine is used in this evolution. The Incident Commander ? considers staffing the Reserve Engine with call back personnel. .. • Flying Brands. Depending on the wind direction and thermal column produced, it may be zznecessary to use first alarm or additional resources to watch for and respond to flying brands landing on wood roofs, and. in grasses and landscape throughout the area. Page 2 of 6 t,. SOP 102.18 Public Information. Burning embers and toxic smoke may drift into residential neighborhoods and pose additional challenges. Coordinate neighborhood contacts and public information with the Police Department. Hazardous Materials. Containment of a large fuel or oil spill in the water may require a hazardous materials response. There are ten boats, one car (irrrthe metal building), and one truck housed on the pier. Request a Hazmat Technician or --Team. response as required. If required,. notify ESCA (425-776-3722) to secure a State mission number and initiate a call for resources to contain spills from the water side.:;.Notify the US Coast Guard (206-442-7070) concerning fuel spills or hazards caused. -by floating debris as timbers and planks detach from the pier and enter the waterways,. OWNER RESPONSIBILITY Meadowdale Marina was inspected by the Building Division and Fire Prevention Division in late January.2003. Inspectors met with the owner's representative, Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic (206-353-6456), who is required to do the following: 1. Submit plans to the Building Department addressing shoring of the collapsed section. 2. Continue discussions with.PUD for a temporary electrical service. The panels and overhead service are located in the collapsed area. The overhead line .to the building is stretched very tight. 3. Repair fire sprinkler system impairments as soon as possible. 4. Remove all portable LPG bottles from inside buildings. 5. Begin the process of decommissioning and removing the 1,000-gallon fuel tank and pump from the west'side' of the pier. This information, along with the check -off sheet and prefire plan is located. under'the large status board in the Battalion Chief vehicle, and is attached to the Meadowdale Marina pre -plan. As with any tactical plan, this document serves as a guideline and may be modified by the first arriving Company Officer or Incident Commander as required. Enclosed are the Meadowdale Marina Prefire Plan and a Tactical Plan,.!Check-Off Sheet for a Large Fire. Thomas J. Tomberg . Fire Chief By: Battalion Chief Schmitt Page 3of6 SOP 102.18 r PUGET SOUND ' I i 1 Sept Gate Tan Parking I Lot 216'_'—� 7 78 FIE 160' — ----� V � v Stor � rt, 'd 162nd 'J Boat ® 70' E Hoist Boat Storage Gas Tank 0y Boat T Hoist 82' Boat SAS e PUGET SOUND MEADOWDALE MARINA Water Line Page 4 of 6 r SOP 102.18 BUILDING NAME: ME+DOIVVDALE MARINA #: 16111 1. Building addi'E�11 16TH PL SW. 2. Building description: Boat storage business of type V constructiop., 3000 sq tift Wood frame throughout and setting on wooden pilin_qs_o,,1er water. South end of the pier constructed -o���cQp; ete with concrete floors. 3. Units Respond_n.g:. _ 1st Alarm: 3lg--ff D/C, Dive Team 2nd Alarmz.t,. •1T,.. 1A, All chiefs, EMS 1 3rd Alarm:3�.;y�1A, All chiefs. General: 4. Needed Fire Flow: 25%:438 50%:875 75%:1313 100%:1750 Available Flow:. 3544.,<,gpm. 5. Required Units for GPM delivery: Two. 6. Required Personnel f75r'25% involvement: Command 2 Search 4 Ventilation 2 Aid 2 Other 6 7. Units Needed: Command: 1 Engines: 3 Trucks: 1 Aid 1 Medic: 2 Oth6r-Supp6r�:Equipment: Dive Team, EMS 1, Air/light support unit 8. Fire Behavior Prediction:Fire located in store area held in { check by spr#nkler-4 item, but fire'located in boat storage area,would not be controled by.the sprinkler system. Because...the_.l_qoats..are stacked on top of each other, in the boat storage. area. 9. Strategy.: Quick attack.,• Pump into sprinkler.system. 10. Problems Anticipated: If a fire were started under the dock it would ber:d.fficul't-�o exstinguish , the fire would move quickly throught .the ifriderneight•the marina. 11. Hazards to P�6onnel:."_Falling in the water , there is.a weak gaurd rail around the.dock and some of the pier decking is weak and roten through. Gaurd dogs are on the dock at night between the FIRS. 2200 to 0500. 12 . StandPipes : --.Yes do _X_ F.D. Hookup ggation-r 13. Sprinklers: Yes X No F.D. Hookup.Lo-Gat o_zT: Eastside of tracks on the southside of —the road, just before you cross the .tracks. 14.. Any Other.Needed Information: Keep all fire apparatus off the marina dock PREPARED BY:F/F Martin SHIFT A DATE:9=1-92 Page 5 of 6 SOP 102.18 TACTICAL CHECK OFF SHEET FOR MEADOWDALE MARIN_ A CONFIRMED FIRE ❑ Size -up. ❑ Locate and Establish Command. ❑ Request Seattle Fireboat via Seattle Dispatch Center, and Kingston Marine 81 via Kitsap CenCom. ❑ Request additional resources as required. Owner's representative is Vlandan "Milo" Milosavlgevic at 206-353-6456. ❑ Notify Chief Officers/Fire Marshal. ❑ Request Utility Package. ❑ Request ESCA and Coast Guard (no firefighting capability). ❑ Base all incoming units on 75th Place. ❑ Position Ladder 20 at base of driveway, east of the railroad tracks; take own supply with on -site hydrant. ❑ Edmonds Engine back down driveway, and lays Monitor Reverse to hydrant on 75th Place and 162. ❑ Establish "Brand Division or Group" to monitor flying embers in neighborhood. ❑ Ladder 20 used for immediate brand control and stopping pier fires close to railroad tracks. ❑ Edmonds Engine used to supply sprinkler connection and ground monitor. ❑ Spill containment. ❑ Debris containment in waterways. , . ❑ Public information. Page 6 of 6 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:38 PM To: Schmitt, Bob; Tomberg, Thomas Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina Then I would ask that the following disclaimer be appended: "The viability of the sprinkler system in it's current state is unknown. The system may be utilized until it is repaired, although the effectiveness on a fire remains questionable. Activate the automatic sprinklers by opening the stem and yoke valves in the vault or by pumping into the FDC". Fire Prevention will advise when the system is back in service ... blah, blah. John -----Original Message ----- From: Schmitt, Bob Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:23 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Westfall, John Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina I don't think we need to change the language. The original identifies that the system is broken and that in the event of a fire you may have to open the footvalve. If you add FM Westfalls wording, if I read it correctly, he says " the system is presently impaired and should not be used...". FM's last comment sounds like he agrees with me, that we could use the system even if it is broken. I vote to leave the SOP the way it is. -----Original Message ----- From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:17 AM To: Westfall, John; Schmitt, Bob Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina Thanks guys for the good discussion. Now, what do we want that sentence•to say? Please send me new and/or improved language, or whatever. I will forward it to JWS. Thanks. -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM To: Schmitt, Bob; Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina Mike and I discussed this. He is the one that evaluated the buildings with Asst. Building Official. He did not identify the exact size of the break in the system. The deluge effect would be at the broken pipe area and not necessarily over the fire. However, if a sprinkler was fused elsewhere due to a fire, the supply pressure may override the losses at the break to put water at the open head. We agree that it wouldn't hurt to open the stem and yoke valves in the vault, or take the FDC, especially since that is all we have to work with until it's repaired or removed with wooden building. Building Department has given them 30 days for resolution. My concern with SOP wording was only that the system could not be depended upon to extinguish the fire. Thanks Bob. John ---=-Original Message ----- From: Schmitt, Bob Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:08 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina My thought on this was to go ahead and open the valves even if it is broken. Consider it a large diameter deluge system. If heads in a different area are opened due to a fire, there may still be sufficient residual pressure and water gallonage to extinguish a fire a way from the broken pipe. If the fire happens to be below the broken pipe, then we just put the fire out if we charged the system. In addition, there are actually two risers in the sprinkler room. If the fire was to start in the metal building then water should still be directed to this area. Maybe my hydraulics are a little rusty but couldn't these things I mentioned above happen? -----Original Message ----- From:' Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:13 PM To: Schmitt, Bob Subject: FW: SOP Meadowdale Marina 2/11 /03 Bob: The pipe on the Meadowdale Marina A/S System is broken, so it doesn't matter what valve is, opened, pumped water will just flow out the break. John suggested the language below, and I modified it for the final copy of the SOP. If you have a different understanding, let us know tomorrow. If not, please put out a Fire Group tomorrow saying that further investigation of the system indicates it is totally out of service until further notice. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:28 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: SOP Meadowdale Marina How's this? The sprinkler system is presently impaired and should not be used whether opening stem and yoke valves in vault on west side of tracks or pumping into fire department connection. Fire Prevention will provide notification to all personnel when the system is back in service and can be utilized. 1 S'T- 'IV )V', Westf""all, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:53 AM To: Schmitt, Bob; Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina Mike and I discussed this. He is the one that evaluated the buildings with Asst. Building Official. He did not identify the exact size of the break in the system. The deluge effect would be at the broken pipe area and not necessarily over the fire. However, if a sprinkler was fused elsewhere due to a fire, the supply pressure may override the losses at the break to put water at the open head. We agree that it wouldn't hurt to open the stem and yoke valves in the vault, or take the FDC, especially since that is all we have to work with until it's repaired or removed with wooden building. Building Department has given them 30 days for resolution. My concern with SOP wording was only that the system could not be depended upon to extinguish the fire. Thanks Bob. John -----Original Message ----- From: Schmitt, Bob Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:08 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas Cc: Westfall, John; Smith, Mike Subject: RE: SOP Meadowdale Marina My thought on this was to go ahead and open the, valves even if it is broken. Consider it a large diameter deluge system. If heads in a different area are opened due to a fire, there may still be sufficient residual pressure and water gallonage to extinguish a fire a way from the broken pipe. If the fire happens to be below the broken pipe, then we just put the fire out if we charged the system. In addition, there are actually two risers in the sprinkler room. If the fire was to start in the metal building then water should still be directed to this area. Maybe my hydraulics are a little rusty but couldn't these things I mentioned above happen? -----Original Message ----- From: Tomberg, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:13 PM To: Schmitt, Bob Subject: FW: SOP Meadowdale Marina 2/11 /03 Bob: The pipe on the Meadowdale Marina A/S System is broken, so it doesn't matter what valve is opened, pumped water will just flow out the break. John suggested the language below, and I modified it for the final copy of the SOP. If you have a different understanding, let us know tomorrow. If not, please put out a Fire Group tomorrow saying that further investigation of the system indicates it is totally out of service until further notice. Thanks. TT -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:28 PM To: Tomberg, Thomas Subject: SOP Meadowdale Marina How's this? The sprinkler system is presently impaired and should not be used whether opening stem and yoke valves in vault on west side of tracks or pumping into fire department connection. , Fire Prevention will provide notification to all personnel when the system is back in service and can be utilized. Westflall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:08 AM To: Chase, Sandy Subject: RE: City Hall Fire Alarms Sandy: Please have Kerri remain the designated person when she's staffing the reception. It will not hurt to have one or 20 calls to 9-1-1, just as long as everyone understands it needs to be done to get FD response. During the Monday alarm only Mike Stark and David G. were here, they can't depend upon Kerri at that time. I will clarify to City Hall. Thank you, John -----Original Message ----- From: Chase, Sandy Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:41 AM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: City Hall Fire Alarms Hi John, During normal business hours, it is my understanding that the person at the main reception desk (usually Kerri) is designated to call 9-1-1. Should everyone be calling? Sandy -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:38 AM To: City Hall Cc: King, Tom Subject: City Hall Fire Alarms City Hall members: Allow me to clarify the actions to be taken during a fire at City Hall, using the acronym RACE: R RESCUE persons on fire A ACTIVATE building Alarm and call 9-1-1 C CONTAIN fire, if able E EVACUATE building The fire alarm at City Hall provides notification of a fire in the building only. Call 9-1-1 to alert fire department of the alarm. Evacuate building to designated meeting place, that is, Hekinan Square on the East side of building. Remember to bring your customers with you. Senior Department/Division members should get a head count to assure all persons are safely outside of building. Firefighters will mitigate problem and search building for persons unaccounted for. ' Facilities maintenance has identified the problem with the alarm system that crated false alarms. They are in the process of making needed repairs. Treat every alarm with respect for the safety of the public and yourself. Ask me if you have any questions. Thank you, John Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:18 AM To: City Hall Subject: Fire Alarm 9-1-1 caller Members: Sandy has reminded me that Kerri is the designated 9-1-1 caller Monday through Friday 8-5. If you find yourself waiting in Hekinan Square and growing moss while waiting for the Fire engine to arrive-Kerri must be on vacation. You should call 9-1-1 yourself. Thank you. Message Page 1 of 1 ti 1601 7 &� Smith, Mike From: Harrison, Marie Sent:. Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:56 AM To: DST; Smith, Mike Subject: Meadowdale Marina FYI: Milo was in today saying he wants to demo the one building that is falling'down. I gave him the demolition handout and pointed out submittal requirements. Jeannine would also like a letter with the full scope of his proposal, this will require full review. -He asked for turnaround time, I said that would be difficult to determine. Depending on the scope of work, planning may need some kind of shoreline approval. He should apply soon because JLG gave him a deadline regarding repairs. E. Marie Harrison Development Services City of Edmonds 425.771.0220 x 1389 harrison@ci.edmonds.wa.us 02/12/03 A. rha 189'3 CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSO MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-MO • FAX (425) 771-=1 Website: ~w .d.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering January 31, 2003 Meadowdale Marina LLC Jim Johnson, Registered Agent 7411 196th Street Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Dear Mr. Johnson: The purpose of this letter is to outline City requirements regarding the repair work to be performed on the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, City Fire Department crews responded to a fire sprinkler flow alarm on January 2501, 2003 and discovered a portion of the pier and heavy "framed timber building on the pier, partially collapsed. City Fire and Building Officials met with the Marina General Manager Mr. Milosavljevic on January 28 h, 2003 to view the damage and discuss the repair issues. Mr. Milosavljevic indicated that he had the authority to speak and make decisions on behalf of the LLC. If this is not true please inform my office immediately. Given this the following is required by the City: • Contact PUD and immediately repair the stressed electrical line that services the heavy timber building. • Take immediate action to protect the electrical service panels that are now exposed to the weather due to the partial building collapse. A State Electrical permit may be required to repair etc.; it is your responsibility to contact the State Labor & Industries Everett offices for permitting requirements. • Remove the abandoned fuel tank located on. the westerly portion of the pier. A tank removal permit ($45) is required. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of: this letter. The City Fire Inspector must be .on site to observe the cleaning and removal of the tank while in process. • Remove the septic tank located on the east side of the pier and cap plumbing lines to and from the tank. A compliance permit ($50) is required for this work. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Obtain a repair permit to make all necessary repairs. to the fire sprinkler system, (fee based on contractor's repair bid for the work). Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Mr. Johnson January 31, 2003 . Page Two Secure the pier from access via land and water within 30 days date of this letter.. Removalof ladders that allow water access to the pier and installation of "No Trespassing" signs are required. If in the future you decide to repair the damaged columns, piers, decking, or building, etc. you shall be required to obtain a building permit for this work. It is also highly likely that some Planning permits such as Shoreline permit, critical areas review, etc. would also be required. We suggest that you schedule for a pre -application meeting with City officials for any future. repairs, remodeling. or re -building for this site. If you have any questions please feel free to .contact me. at 425-771-0220 during normal City business hours. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance for a mutually agreeable day and time as I am frequently assisting other citizens and not always available. Sincerely, 6/Av*�Fr� Jeannine L. Graf Building Official . Mr. Milosavljevic, 23423 Brier Road, Brier, WA 98036 Smith, Mike From: Smith, Mike Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:12 AM To: Fire Dept Group Subject: Inspection of Meadowdale Marina Ann Bullis, BC Schmitt and myself did an inspection of the Marina after the partial collapse of the NE section of the old wooden structure. Listed are the issues we discussed that the general manger, Milo, will need to act on. 1) Submit plans with the Building Dept on how he proposes to shore up the collapsed section. 2) Continue his discussions with PUD for a temporary electrical service. The panels and overhead service are located in the collapsed area. The overhead line to the building is stretched very tight right now. 3) Get the fire sprinkler system turned back on as soon as possible. 4) Remove all portable LPG bottles from inside the buildings. 5) Begin the process of decommissioning and removing the 1000 gallon fuel tank and pump from the West side of the pier. Presently the marina has only liability insurance (no fire ins.). The outside decking is very slippery. The planking inside the structure is in relatively good shape. The newer section (metal building with concrete deck) is in good shape. The drive and pier will not support any of our vehicles due to numerous bad spots in the decking. Milo's plans to try to upgrade the deck and the wooden structure. He is also trying to get the place cleaned out. Money is an issue. Any Questions please call me. Tomberg, Thomas From: Smith, Mike Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:03 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Bullis, Ann; Snook, Mike Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina Contacted the owner, Milo, by phone. We will meet him tomorrow, 1-28-03 at 0900 hrs. Jeannine Graf advised me that the property was sold to a Jim Johnson in the latter part of 2002. -----Original Message ----- From: Smith, Mike Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:16 AM To: Tomberg, Thomas; Graf, Jeannine Cc: Bullis, Ann; Snook, Mike Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina An inspection will take place at 1400 hrs today to access the damage and make determinations on the structural integrity of the pier and buildings. Myself and members of the Building Dept will do the survey. -----Original Message ----- From: Dahl, Douglas Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:21 AM To: Smith, Mike Cc: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina Mike, we responded to a sprinkler water flow alarm at meadowdale marina today (call #EF0272) Arrived to find the north east corner of the old building with a partial collapse and the sprinkler flowing through the broken pipes. The owner, Vladan Milosavlgevic, was on scene and advised of the situation. The marinas water supply was shot off at the railroad tracks (main) and the owner was also advised to call PUD immediately to respond to fix or disconnect the power drop to the building that was under excessive tension due to the partial collapse. Advising you because this looks like it could be a longterm problem to fix, so would expect no fire protection to that building fora while ... don't know if you have a problem with this and want to follow up. The owners phone number is (206) 353 6456 D2 Tomberg, Thomas To: Haakenson, Gary; Bowman, Duane; Stern, David; Miller, Noel; Ohlde, Arvilla; Mcintyre, Brian Subject: FW: Meadowdale Marina 1 /27/03 Fire policy has long been to not venture onto MM. Below is Mike's email to Fire Group. "An inspection will take place at 1400 hrs today to access the damage and make determinations on the structural integrity of the pier and buildings. Myself and members of the Building Dept will do the survey." Thanks. TT Smith, Mike From: Dahl, Douglas , Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:21 AM To: Smith, Mike Cc: Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina Mike, we responded to a sprinkler water flow alarm at meadowdale marina today (call #EF0272) Arrived to find the north east corner of the old building with a partial collapse and the sprinkler flowing through the broken pipes. The owner, Vladan Milosavlgevic, was on scene and advised of the situation. The marinas water supply was shot off at the railroad tracks (main) and the owner was also advised to call PUD immediately to respond to fix or disconnect the power drop to the building that was under excessive tension due to the partial collapse. Advising you because this looks like it could be a long term problem to fix, so would expect no fire protection to that building for a while ... don't know if you have a problem with this and want to follow up. The owners phone number is (206) 353 6456 D2 '_ i I:WA010 Snohomish County, Washington Edmonds Fire Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Page 1 DISPATCHED INCIDENT ---------------- i i=1 Run # E -L'..A-272 incident Date E 0 0 3 e 0 y;,, Location 16 , 1 j . u t S �:, W r_%ivii!i';iD WA 9F'�;,�2 i :.._ a �. y J �' L_ City Map 43 A Co:_tilty Map Census Fire A l oA r_F50*7 Coorci, X Y jurisdictional Station STATION ` E Alarm Method TELEPHONE DIRECT TO = I RE DEPARTMENT Alarm Level I This incident is owned b R Purge Date Dispatch Date 01/E5/200 Time :t 9 08n i3 Enro:_lt e Date 01 .`2`_1 t_'0 Jt,J Tim. fim. y'°a 10:.35 Arrival Date 01/25/2003 Tin;.= 09:16:01 Clear Date 01/25/2003 Time 09z4604 Response Time, Minutes 7 Sec 48 Incident Duration: Hours Min 38 ALL INCIDENTS --------------- E m m # �11 Location 16111 76 PL W, EL1iYlONDS, WA 98020 City Map'435P County Map cenEu� Fire Block EF50*7 1_oor,d: X Y =.1--1 i f'� r SH I Inge=_•tina ion Status Situations I=O•i.nC 1 VICINITY ALARM Actions Taken: 1 iNVESTAKE 2 SHUT DPWN SYSTEM. General Property Use STORAGE, WAREHOUSING USE Specific Proper,ty Use Management Occupancy Type Structure Type Structure ,status Occupied at time of !n.. T Aerial EMS Rescue Oth*rs | | Member Reporting EF0991 / DAHL, DOUGLAS C .ruc"'m Command 1 Tankers Hazmat FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington Page E EFD EF03-272 Edmonds Fire Department 01/25/2002 FIELD INCIDENT REPOR7 Officer in Charge EF0232 / SCHMITT, ROBERT Weather, ` Air Temperature Wildland Haz Severity Fire Service Casualties: Injuries Fatalities Non -Fire Servicl Casualties: Injuries Fatalities ' Aid Type NO AUTO/MUTUAL AID GIVEN/RECEIVED OR NOT REPORTED Aid Agency EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT ' Multiagency Inc. No. Special Studies: 1 UNIT INFORMATION -------------------- Unit LYNNWOOD - ENGINE 14 Role FIRST IN UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 INVESTIGATE 2 ' Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 01/25/2003 Time 0:08:13 PERSONNEL ----------- Role UNIT OFFICER DID LF0650 Name KELLY, DENNIS Condition Role DRIV DID LF0824 Name MARTIN, DUANE RESCUE TECH Condition Role CREW DID LF0973 Name POND, KATHRYN Condition Unit EDMONDS v ENGINE 16 Role SUPPORT UNIT , . Distance Travelled Dispatch Date 01/25/2003 Time 09:08:13 PERSONNEL FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington Page 2 EFD EF03-272 Edmonds Fire Department 01125/2002 FIELD INCIDENT REPORT Role UNIT OFFICER ` DID EF0991 Name DAHL, DOUGLAS C Condition Role DRIV DID EF1536 Name CAMGELL, THONAS Condition Rolp CREW DID EF141 Name H AS, DEVIN Condition Unit B20 Role SUPPORT UNIT Crew Action Taken: 1 2 Diatance Travelled Dispatch bate 01/25/2003 Time 09:10:35 PERSONNEL ------------- Role UNIT OFFICER DZD'EF0232 Name SCHMITT, ROBERT Condition � NARRATIVE � EF0991 01/25/2003 E16 ^ . EIS WAS DISPATCHED WITH E14 AND B20 TO A REPORTED SPRINKLER WATER FLOW ALARM AT MEADOWDALE MARINA. E14 ARRIVED AND FOUND WATER FLOWING IN THE BUILDING WITH A PARTIAL BUILDING COLLAPSE OF THE NORTHE EAST CORNER� E14 ADVISED E16 TO SHUT DOWN THE WATER FLOW AT THE MAIN SHUT OFF AT THE RAILROAD TRACKS. UPON SECURING ��"",�=��.��r�,m��rno�c�n.� co�r/*uv���u r1im |7rlHl--T�L- bUlLU1N6--- DrD.NOT HAVE SPRINKLER PROTECTIONAT THIS TIME AND NEEDED A BUILDING AND SPRINKLER REPAIR PERSON BEFORE IT COULD.BE RESTORED. E16 ALSO ADV.ISED MR. MILOSAVLGEVIC THAT THE POWER DROP TO THE BUILDING WAS UNDER EXCESSIVE TENSION bUE TO THE COLLAPSE AND PUD NEEDED TO BE CALLED IMMEDIATELY TO FIX THE PROBLEM. THE OWNER STATED TO B20 AND E16 THAT HE WOULD CALL PUD IMMEDIATELY TO RESPOND FIRWA010 Snohomish County, Washington - EFD EF03-272 Edmonds Firp Department FIELD INCIDENT REPORT AND WOULD ALSO START WORKING ON THE SPRINKLER/BUILDING PROBLEM. IN SERVICE. Page 4 01/25/2002 E16 RETURNED DOUG DAHL LIEUTENANT, EFD 01/25/03 09:59:42 PRINT REQUESTED BY TERMINAL EFPC20 Incident History for: #EF03000272 Xref: #EP03002104 Case Numbers: $EF03000320 $LF03000403 Entered 01/25/03 09:08:04 BY SCPQ07 SC752 Dispatched` 01/25/03 09:08:13 BY SCPCO2SC742 Enroute 01/25/03 09:10:35 Onscene 01/25/03 09:1601 Clrsed 01/25/03 09:46:24 Initial Type: SWFA Initial Alarm Level: 1 Final Alarm Level: 1 Final Type: SWFA (SPRINKLER WATERFLOW ALARM)Pri:,2 Dispo: . ' Police BLK: E055 Fire BLK: EF507 Map Page: 435A-7 Group: EF1 Beat: MD17 Sr c: Loc: 16111 76 PL W.,EDM -- MEADOWDALE MARINE,EDM high xst: 162 ST W (V) Loc Info: MEADOWDALE MARINA Name: NP THTRy GILBERT /0908 (SC752 ) COPY /0908 $CROSS /0908 (SC742 ) DISP E14 /0908 $ASNCAS E14 /0908 $ASNCAS E14 /0908 ASST E16 /0910 ASSTER' B20 /0910 ENROUT E16 /0910 ENROUT E14 /0916 ' NEWLOC E14 /0916 ONSCNE E14 /0916 OMSCNE E16 /0919 ONSCNE B20 /0926 MISC E14 /0939 AOR . E14 /0946 AOR B20 /0946 AOR E16 /0946 CLOSE *E16 Addr: 15810 75 PL W ,EDM Phonet 4257451461 . ,PD ON SCENE OBSERVING WATER COMING FROM HOME -A[ DIBLE ALARM SOUNDING -BELIEVES IT MAY BE SWFA #EP03002104 #LF0650 KELLY,DENNIS _ RESCUE TECH #LF0824 MARTIN, DUANE -RESCUE TECH #LF0973 POND, KATHRYN $LF03000403 ^ $EF03000320 '#EF0991 DAHL,DOUGLAS #EF1536 CAMPBELL, TOM #EF1541 HAAE, DEVIN #EF0232 SCHMITT,ROBERT - BY ' [MEADOWDALE.COMMAND! , STAGE E16 ON 75 - ' , 3 ST WF, M ARINA HEAVY WATER FROM BLDG ,ALM SECURE ' ,COMMAND 8ROKEN DOWN ,BEEN TURNED OVER TO OWNER - ADVISED HIM HE NEED S TO CONTACT PUD/0946 .` '1% Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:00 PM To: Graf, Jeannine; Fire Dept Group Subject: Meadowdale Marina 16111 76th PI W Meadowdale Marina has performed annual confidence test for their two dry sprinkler systems. The piping had leaks requiring welded repairs. The stem & yoke valves for the backflow prevention assembly in the vault are OPEN. The sprinkler system is no longer impaired and they are no longer out of compliance. There is not currently business conducted on the pier other than owner cleanup. The property manager anticipates the future of the pier as a small business building as well as a kayak rental/diving shop with some portion of the pier dedicated for public use (e.g. fishing). Enhancements would require upgrade to concrete pilings. The Shoreline Management process may limit the owner's ability to see substantial changes to the property or use. John t.�. a•:r ! :�.. ,.. . WORK ORDERUMBER �: CO I Fie �, 1 •'2 ;s' Cj ' a �� r s �"' �I'� �`Sirip/e�rG�inne// ,. 2 '7,� ,Secur 9520,11 th AvenueyS Suue 100.• Seattle;?Washington!98108 • Phone (206) 291 .1;400 •Fax (206) 291-1500 E yDate 1.0/02/02 r I'DUPLI•CATE-, .'BIgto: 03294. :. ,lob location: MEADOWDALE 4MAR I NE-''.' 03294 :16111 7$TH `PL W . RD. # EDMONDS,• 'WA'' 980.2.E-4551 Terms Cash on 'D.e1`iver'y 10/02/.0'2 09.',2S' Bill To: MEADOWDA'L'E'' MARINE Salesperson ;. ..,"., � •� ;��•�•'" ` 1611,1 7.6TH..PL W EDMONDS, WA 9802E-4551 ptr Contact I LLOW Phone 206-353-64.-S g'aJagax ;Rate::,.• .,8,, A- Ans:pecf . Terms of This f, 1 • ., . , ..: Aareement'Arw, L i , ;❑ Tme and Material ,, - , , N ,: r: QFixed>Price of - � Pnce Not to Exceed'' ' —, �s ,,j zi z 3 z } c �ya-; ,Q z� .a/'�,..�c♦'-- a� \F3>?'S'� n�:;� - z - �QtiaritY, l�At 'Fii >I £ R,v*✓<Fi,iE'�S� $.�«VWCii. <Ky'i ,.. SPRINKLER INSP 5 ,.Lt .i •sTL s ;..,. I II Bob Doyel Sprinkler Inspector Celli.206-255-7597 SimplexGnnnell LP 9520 loth Avenue South `l ,`, tB /L+O Suite 100 Seattle, WA98108 ,, r Fire & Tele: 206-291-1400Security ` + Fax.206-291-1500 24 Hour Emergency Service WKW.simplexgrinnell corn Sirnp/exGrinne14 � � ILI- q II . f''� - '�?i W : t„.S ). .•Ifs. .7(1i�t!f`" t� r.w%•. ,d �. �....,.�.IL: �'I;t ,' f. F,tl+ IG ,: !,i +fIY. Date Qt k; , r fr " ; 3 + ,' } ,: • : bep r r ;ru By1.8igning'1 supervl�soryes op6rAt6:propet j ��.> ils 13lt s% 1 �, ., 1 rl � :,• � r s xDld+'sti `erv`si switches`reset u/ra. l �� ti.. .... .., u.... s,i'c-. i,. L.,.. .,� 1.; :3„t$•. Vr' t ..7r1.. t, . RS9l ,�.l iU t,n :m�f.4 .3; �, �c {�i t, r,r-.�+��lr \'z,i`y, >F �'�I i,l(1'+�iL,b+7Rd'S{'iil3r{ s•,iifirl-�' :R jai;. �!-`.>:I;af !' � haver andYtantlerstat�dihe terms�antlacondition's,p- nted'on th'ellreverse�'side'-O Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:13 AM To: McMurphy, Linda Subject: Meadowdale Marina Hi Linda: I'm on Mr. Milo Slobodanka to turn on his sprinkler systems at Meadowdale Marina. Some work was done by Robert (or Richard) Cobb ... I think this must be the backflow tester? The problem is that one check valve for the DDCV was closed before. Now both of them are. Do you know how I can reach Mr. Cobb or someone about the last backflow test? Thank you John �W CITY OF EDMONDS 121 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH •, EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0215 • FAX (425) 775-7721 FIRE DEPARTMENT August 30, 2002 Mr. Stepanovic Slobodanka t� 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings Dear Mr. Slobodanka: . GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR An observation at your property has revealed that the water is shut off at the vault to the Meadowdale Marina structures. The water provides fire protection for those buildings on the pier utilizing dry automatic fire sprinkler systems. Fire sprinkler systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times,'as required by Uniform Fire Code 1001.5.1. Automatic fire -extinguishing systems are required to be inspected and tested at least annually. File records show that the last automatic sprinkler system inspection was performed on July 51h, 2000. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company (253) 859-5066 provided the last annual service for Mr. Jack Evans. You are required to take the following actions by September 30, 2002: 1 Open water valve to provide fire protection water for your buildings, and 2 Contact a fire sprinkler system service company to provide an annual inspection for your fire protection systems. Have service company forward service test documentation to the Edmonds Fire Department, 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. A citation may be issued for knowing continuance of fire Code violations. Persons who allow a hazard to exist or fail to take action to abate a hazard when ordered or notified to do so shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor in accordance with ECC 5.50.020, as punishable by a fine of $5000 and/or one year of jail. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it to continue. Each separate day during which any violation occurs is deemed to constitute a separate violation thereof, and a separate offense thereunder, and upon conviction will be punished accordingly. Please contact meat (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions or concerns. ' Thank you for your continuing efforts to promote fire safety in our community. 'T4?A ? S Ae. i rel , s����� �r �. LGO �/ S�Y� J n J. W w� G� Fare MarsF Encl. UFC 1001.5.1 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • e Westfall, John From: Umbaugh, Theresa Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:58 AM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina Owner: Stepanovic Slobodanka (according to Snohomish County Assessor) Mailing address: 23423 Brier Rd, Brier, WA 98036 No phone listing -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:45 AM To: Umbaugh, Theresa Subject: Meadowdale Marina Theresa: Will you please give me information about owner of subject property, incl.: owner name owner phone mailing address Property address: 16111 76th PI W. I have a correction/enforcement issue to make owner aware of. Thank you, John Westfall, John From: McMurphy, Linda Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:35 PM To: Westfall, John Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina Yes, Ron Kolbo from US Filters did the testing . His Phone # is (425) 333-4234 Let me know if you have any problems. Linda P.S. "Welcome back" Hope to see you soon -----Original Message ----- From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:13 AM To: McMurphy, Linda Subject: Meadowdale Marina Hi Linda: I'm on Mr. Milo Slobodanka to turn on his sprinkler systems at Meadowdale Marina. Some work was done by Robert (or Richard) Cobb ... I think this must be the backflow tester? The problem is that one check valve for the DDCV was closed. before.. Now both of them are. Do you know how I can reach Mr. Cobb or someone about the last backflow test? Thank you John 1 Westfall, John From: Westfall, John Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:46 PM To: Graf, Jeannine Cc: Smith, Mike Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina Thanks for the prompt. And today he is still in violation. I am in telephone contact with him, he says the service was completed by service company and faxed to FD, however we have not seen that documentation. A site visit and photos were taken of water service/backflow valves that are closed. Still in violation. have verbals that he was willing to/has complied. I am not gravely concerned given that the building is vacant and remains currently unused. Compliance has been required and it is not yet complied with. I will provide one last chance for Mr. Slobodanka to produce documentation and activate the water service, after which I can go through you, if you like as the next step, or go straight to Prosecutor for gross misdemeanor. John -----Original Message ----- From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: Westfall, John Cc: Raymond, Carla Subject: Meadowdale Marina On 8/30/02 you sent a letter to Mr. Slobondanka regarding Fire code violations at the Meadowdale Marina. You gave him a compliance date of 9/30/02. Please update the enforcement file with the following information: What is the status of this violation case? If the owner has not complied what is the next action? Thank you, JL Graf Jeannine L. Graf Building Official City of Edmonds t 'V August 30, 2002 Mr. Stepanovic Slobodanka 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 Ref: Meadowdale Marina Buildings Dear Mr. Slobodanka: An observation at your property has revealed that the water is shut off at the vault to the Meadowdale Marina structures. The water provides fire protection for those buildings on the pier utilizing dry automatic fire sprinkler systems. Fire sprinkler systems shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, as required by Uniform Fire Code 1001.5.1. Automatic fire -extinguishing systems are required to be inspected and tested at least annually. File records show that the last automatic sprinkler system inspection was performed on July 5th, 2000. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company (253) 859-5066 provided the last annual service for Mr. Jack Evans. You are required to take the following actions by September 30, 2002: 1 Open water valve to provide fire protection water for your buildings, and 2 Contact a fire sprinkler system service company to provide an annual inspection for your fire protection systems. Have service company forward service test documentation to the Edmonds Fire Department, 121 5th Ave. N, Edmonds, WA 98020. A citation may be issued for knowing continuance of Fire Code violations. Persons who allow a hazard to exist or fail to take action to abate a hazard when ordered or notified to do so shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor in accordance with ECC 5.50.020, as punishable by a fine of $5000 and/or one year of jail. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation nor permit it to continue. Each separate day during which any violation occurs is deemed to constitute a separate violation thereof, and a separate offense thereunder, and upon conviction will be punished accordingly. Please contact me at (425) 771-0213 if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you for your continuing efforts to promote fire safety in our community. Encl. UFC 1001.5.1 Sincerely, John J. Westfall Fire Marshal Westfall, John From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:34 AM To: Westfall, John Cc: Raymond, Carla Subject: Meadowdale Marina On 8/30/02 you sent a letter to Mr. Slobondanka regarding Fire code violations at the Meadowdale Marina. You gave him a compliance date of 9/30/02. Please update the enforcement file with the following information: What is the status of this violation case? If the owner has not complied what is the next action? Thank you, JL Graf Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cihj of Edmonds iM 1 Page! o f I c file://A:\MVC-005S.JPG 10/l/2002 QD Pale 1 of 1 file:l/A:AMVC-005S.JPG 10/1%2002 �Meladowdal&Marine prepares to- close for good,, Future use of property is �� oc uncettam . By Bill Sheets Edmonds Enterprise editor . EDMONDS — The dock stands in disrepair, rotted boards making for hazardous walking. One of the build- ings looks as -if one good shove would cause it to buck- le and collapse. . The decline of salmon has created ; another economic casualty:. Meadowdale Marine. The business, which has provided . boat storage and launching and sold marine - and fishing -related supplies since 1939, will close its doors for good July 31. The 'tidelands at' 16111' k76th Place ;W: where the dock sits were sold by 20- year-owner Ron Hansen for $300,000 in May. What exact-, ly the new owner — Slobodan ka Stepanovic of Australia — plans to do with the property,, which contains no dry land, is something of a mystery. Hansen said Milo Stepanovic of Brier, who ban- Jack Evans (left), the lone remaining employee of Meadowdale Marine, chats with a customer on the decaying dock. A blank catch log can be seen in the background. dies .the transaction for his sister, told him they planned to continue to operate the marine business — but such has been the case for only two months. Milo Stepanovic had also mentioned to Hansen that other uses could be employed "further down the line," such as an art gallery, said Hansen, who.is a Shoreline City . Council member. "He's a, very artistic guy," he said. Milo Stepanovic could not be reached for comment. Meanwhile, all the remain- ing fishing tackle and boat supplies in the store are on sale for 40 to 50 percent off, said Jack Evans, the lone remaining employee. I'm just helping close it up," he said. Most of the owners of the approximately 25 boats that remain in dry storage have found new locations for their boats, such as the marinas in Edmonds and Everett, Evans said. The facility has held as many as 180 at tunes in the past, 160 in the big building and 20 in the older, smaller, building, he said. Evans came in when Hansen acquired the busi- ness. in 1981 after the previ- ous owners had gone into bankruptcy. Those owners had bought it from sons of Captain Haines, who started the business in 1939 when the now -decrepit wooden building was barged over in two pieces from Booth Fish- eries in the Port Hadlock/Port Ludlow area, Hansen said. The business operated for years as Haines Sport Fishing Wharf. Captain Haines was the grandfather of Hansen's wife, Jan. The larger building with concrete pilings, in which boats have been stored three and four deep, was built in 1976; A forklift would lift the boats off the racks and onto an elevator that would lower them down into the water, and the reverse would occur for, boats returning. Or, fish- ermen would simply drive onto the dock and have their boats launched from there. As many as 10 or 12 people were employed by the busi- ness at times in the past, Evans said. When Hansen took over he had the dock re -decked and installed a new elevator in 1985. Hansen operated a cafe operated on the dock for a few years but closed it after it steadily lost about $100 a week, Evans said. The employees were eat- ing up all the profits, most- ly," Evans said with a chuck- le. By contrast, in the busi- ness' heyday, sales of fishing tackle would bring in $200,000 to $300,000 a year, Evans said. The business was regular presence it the :local' sportsmens' and boat shows, he said. But those days are gone. The decline hit sharply three to four years ago with the closure of Puget Sound to fishing much of the year, Hansen said. 'That had a pretty devastating effect," he Evans, meanwhile, ` W move to his vacation home Pateros, take it easy for a fe months and then work at 1 new vocation, home bui mg I've never been on une ployment in my life so I thi I'm going to try it," he said E� �4 ,t Date: APPLICATION FOR PERMIT FOR MATERIALS OR PROCESSES U.F.I.R. # 898-577-11Z-507 Dear Sir, In conformity with the terms of the Fire Code, application is hereby made to store, use or maintain the following specific or processes: Welding operation. _Storage_and handling of Class I, II and III flammable. andlor, combustible -liquids. The materials or processes are at the following specific locations at the address below: Mailing Address: (If di: aerent than business address) Phase I, Ltd. DBA Meadowdale Marine 20146-25` Avenue N. W. Seattle, WA 98177 Name of Firm or Company Meadowdale Marine Address (Number and Street) 1. 1-76 th Place West Signature Title Mail' to: Fire Marshal Edmonds Fire Department 121-51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 A:WordFor sli/Permit 02/0S/0Ibe �� anon:cvon:z®ovooas..00nvsrmo:zosssasps✓of:ososoov.aasms:voav-.�svon�earo.:v�ov.ros:vvvos.a�ovn:va:.rouc..easmvsys� CITY OF EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT 03-19-01 898-577-1 1Z-507 12-31-01 Date of Issue UFIR Number Date of Expiration This PERMIT is issued to: I Meadowdale Marine located at: 16111-76 1h Place West I Edmonds, WA To engage in the business, occupation or process of: Welding Operation And shall constitute permission to maintain, store, use or handle materials or to conduct process which produce conditions hazardous to life or property or to install equipment used in connection with such activities as follows: Storage and handling of Class I, II, and III flammable and/or combustible liquids. Allowed Occupant Load: , Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Fire Code, any violation of the Code may be grounds for the revocation of this PERMIT. A-_ This permit does not take the place of any license required by law and is not transferable. Any change in the use or, occupancy of premises shall require a new permit. —fio, ri 1, a e MarskAl ureau of Fire Prev ntion T This Permit Must Be Posted At All Times in The Premises Mentioned Above City of Edmonds Community Development Code 19.75.060 ;0 6 d 6'OlrrYrr00'dOYaOi•I itWI-------- /OD OY:/iHrJr OYSr.vrlydQn )' r J d WI OWI--------IA!'r /�'a/J�•.Yb.Y4lOs. P.IrS'S:� Revised November 1990 WASHINGTON COPJNITY RI(� IT -TO -KNOW#: /J N J Foam AppPaeroved OMB No� 72ages Facilittyy Identification P 1-/ Lei !DleliS� Owner/OPeretoDr Name Name Al �� D 0�7/+L C /2�nJ/C �,l Nams P«� r� �ji CJ PPhone (�.��) / iyA Tier Two Stree,��AND r14 MaiAddre.s �I —7r�r* Pr,. EMERGENCY CRY 7,c.z ��(7f County S'Va --4 u(� Stets _l!"� /T Ipr HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL SIC Code ® Du N Brad m-®-® Emargengr Conlirct .. oN/Y�-�r�i+�/ Name Tkle INVENTORY Phone ( cr, ► s s 2e Hr. Phone Specific fmetaR by Chemical OR.. 10 >r suss ?- �� . %/} GLC 7 -2e 2/ e �'�� ^Jr This 0 �1L/Z • /�► A N�7 G �/t t 01ClAl.: ':USE .' . ...... : P 7'S`3 - �-7 `f �7 24 Hr. Ph.. :� O#1LY � �• fleoeiveaPhone() t,hfrittee Important: Read all instructions before completing form Reporting Perlod From January l to D.wnti.r 31,19� ❑s"4Ofast y6w. Phi ys�icai Storage bodes tend Ltian- .Ci�6M16al[Descriptibb �nd:Heaittt : Inventory � (Nb ntld®ntia >... .Ha zards :........:. :;Oh - >, o,�iv� �;. ' Sr fniivns.. : �... • :. :. ... ...::� suss CAS ° ®[] Ts:oa:i❑ Fins -� A "00:11{dodo) svesrsr�,� o< ,o,t2 (,�.>> Chem. Name Gi.�o[-r'J of�pressure :° Avp DaINr Reactivity suss. Artt0ltnt•{ptxis) : •:..: cA«k dr El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ElIrmrdide (soot.) �j.iifMrlT!{day!} ..: Via Nar qt PPure,Mix Solid Liquid Ga. ENS EHS Name jl o.1.y.d (chronic){{ ❑ CAS m ❑ el ❑ Met, Oel ... �n : , 3u�ddert Reles ae Chem. Name of Pressure Reactivity r'�.�,, `` �►v9r Oag 1..�. A:nciuni f ek R.._�1 9_ ��ar,dl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ In oil d. (acWM No. of Heys R 4� rAarayylj: Pure Mix sold Liquid Ga. ENS Delayed (chronic) Qtl-3l>•(di :) �MONDS FIRE DEP_T„ ❑ EHS Name'"' Trade CAS ❑ secret ❑ Fire Maz,. Dsi ptrtaunt {�awt!) Sudden Release Chem. Name of Pros.ure R°aot"")' � j'`� Av. DlNy . g 1 t.J� Arnount(e�de) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Immediate (acute) •, _ .. • dwaml "�n Pure Mix Solid Liquid Gas EHS Delayed (chronic) Na. Oi Days L�L�.L�t �n�liA �dayt) EHS Name El er1 cat L axe sfgrf a er compJetulg eectmas -.. ... ... sae tt+trda I certify under penafty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in pages one th and that based 1 have allached a eke plan rt obtaining the infor/Jation. I eve belithat the submitted information is tru r s, end o 11214b/ own my inquiry of those individuals responsible -lom l7 �S�i (j �l.� � (� / f 1 have attached a list of eke coordinate abb /�ld� N��� _ �' N C /J r-�•21/iai�L a descriptiond I have attachedother a ope operators authorised representative _ Si natu Name and official title of owner/ rator OR own r Date signed safeguard dikes end other tafegtrerd measure! WtL �1�22 !r�rC,G'C�-0 la aID- -0'S1 j LGNfnJ c�rY�ui "Jo / Po2.i'" /1 tz"s,Q l2�7 e v CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR 7110-210TH ST:S.W. • EDMONDS, WA 98026 • (206) 771-0235 • FAX (206) 744-6057 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: FSt 1gc�0 July 22,1997 CERTIFIED FINAL NOTICE ATTN: PROPERTY OWNER MEADOWDALE MARINE 16111 75th PL. W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Backflow Prevention Assembly Testing - Account #604150 On June 2, 1997, the Meadowdale Marina was notified by letter that the backflow prevention assemblies were due for annual testing. On July 1, 1997, the second notice was sent which stated that the marina had 15 days to take care of this matter. Failure to comply, according to the City of Edmonds Ordinance Chapter 7.20 and Washington State codes WAC 246-290- 490, water service to the above address will be discontinued if test results are not sent to me within 20 days from the date of this letter. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 771-0235, extension 644. Sincerely, � � Linda McMurphy Water Quality Control wordata\water\final • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan November 8, 1988 MEMO TO: Scott Snyder City Attorney FROM: Stan Olsen Senior Inspector SUBJECT: MEADOWDALE.MARINE INSPECTION AND RE -INSPECTION The Fire Department's Annual Inspection was conducted on Septem- ber 7, 1.988.and.re-inspection.was...conducted.on November 8, 1988. Per the attached copy of hazards, the following was found: Items #4, 6, 8 and 9 have.been corrected. Items #1, 2, 3, 5, 7.,_10, 1.1.and 12 remain uncorrected. Items #11 and #12 were given a removal, time of 15.days They have not complied and, dueto the extreme hazard,. we are.re- questing that you contact Mr. Ronald. Hansen, Meadowdale Marine. SO: be Enclosures CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 775-2525 MAYOR FIRE DEPARTMENT. `890-19C� October 20, 1988 Meadowdale Marine 20146-25th N. W. Seattle, WA 98177 Dear Sir, We are in the process of confirming that "leak detection" has been installed on all flammable liquid dispensers in the City of Edmonds. Please provide us with the most current test results for each pump in your system. If it is determined that leak detection is not provided in your system, one will be required based on the following code section: The Uniform Fire Code, 1985 Edition, Sections 79.904(e) re- quires that "each pump shall have installed on the discharge an approved leak -detection device which will provide an indication if the piping and dispensers are not essentially liquid tight". If you have.any questions, please call me at 775-2525, #233, Monday through Friday. GLM:be Sincerely, ta Garys Fire Marshal • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan • April 20, 1983 MEMO TO: Jim Adams City Engineer FROM: Jack D: Weinz Fire Chief SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS FOR MEADOWDALE MARINE WHARF AT ' ,. " " - 7.5TH AVENUE WEST` We are again approaching the time of year that heavy beach usage creates access problems to the wharf. To provide ade- quate signage and control, I recommend that Section 10.207(a) of the Uniform Fire Code be used. I have included a copy of the code for your review. It establishes minimum width, verticle clearances and signing requirements. JDW:be Edmonds Fire Department 898-000-001 • oprir�kler System Check Lisf Location Laebugten Wharf 16111- 76th Date 25 ,?y Shift _ Interior Inspection 1. Area around riser clear (minimum 31) ( 1- 300- 6 spare) 2. Spare heads available ( 300-1000-12 spare) (1000-over-24 spare) 3. Sprinkler wrench available 4. Valves properly labeled 5. OS&Y Valve yesr o'sers located ii S. E. corner of o: _ Building ye no FDC on east side railroad tracks yes no near access ramp yes nd (a) Open ' yes no (b) Properly sealed yes no (c) Valve stem clean ye no 6. Gauges (a) Above alarm valve seat j 2. psi (b) Below alarm valve seat _ 2')0 .2- IYOp si (c) Air pressure 70 7d si 7. Flow Test (Inspectors Test) (a) Condition of water Rust Clear (b) Alarm device operates properly yes no, (c) Monitored system yes no (1) was SncCom alerted on ,waterflow? yes no Exterior Inspection 1. Fire Department Connection (a) Area clear around F.D.C. es no (b) Caps in place ye no (a) Swivels operate ye no (d) A.rea clear around hydrant s no 2. P.I. Valve (a) Open yes no (b) Sealed yes no Remark si IV �� �� a�D� y1S-e� /J-S c -e� a � j n ��-2 V'1 S'-e ram' a' File No. •) Fee : 4 � iS RECEIVED Date Filed: NOV 30'79 dam_ Uf EDMONDS APPLICATION FOR l—,�3 R) TTYANNING DEPT. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT C TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with the appropriate local, state, or feder- al officials to determine whether your project falls within any other permit systems, since a permit under the Shoreline Management Act will not excuse the applicant from compliance with any other local, state or federal ordinances, regulations or statutes applicable to the project. 1. Name of applicant �i1��,u ��oy) WL,�Ili`jta L 411YA '/-) [Air 2. Mailing address 6= �-tiJO), W. 3. Relation of applicant to property:. Owner Lessee Contract purchaser Other (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if known, city 'or town, and county; otherwise give distance and diraction to nearest town):_ 1// 2 L PJ _ Ld , Ed. S'.,.fl/,, 6. Legal description of property: ZoLr 2 —// 6 eQdow l --e +114\0 LI)LL,AIC 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands : &?.f_ / � /,? k,4,1, "-% 8. Current use of the property with existing improvements; )'SX:.td 9. Describe proposed project: ,L,4 Crkvl < ,e ►, .)� rr,aac-, F'ae� L� to %%,24C ,e 9 it (I1 N K v. p C� �� e U ti i K n c7r`,/3( 10. Nature of the shoreline. (Describe type, such as beach, bank or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) o ter. ,;`.. "DECEIVED r Wf 3p'79 CQLANNINGOf nDEP . 11. ., Project diagrams: draw all maps to scale, clearly indicating scale on lower right corner of the map. Attach all maps to application. (a) 'SITE PLAN MAP. Include on map: (1) Site boundary and dimensions in vicinity of project. (2) Land contours using.5-foot intervals or cross sections. If project includes grading, filling, or other altera- tion of contours, then either: (i) Indicate existing and proposed contours and items (3) through (8) below; OR (ii) Provide two.cross sections, one showing existing ground elevations and height of structures, the second showing proposed ground elevations and height of proposed structures, with both showing (4) below. (3) Size and location of existing improvements which will be retained. (4) Ordinary high-water mark. (5) Size and location of proposed structures. (6) Maximum height of proposed structures above existing grade level. (7) State type and amount of proposed fill. (8) Proposed utilities. (b) VICINITY MAP. Indicate relation of site to adjacent lands and the uses to which they are put for at least 400 feet in all direc- tions from the project site. I ��\i:^�. C(�1��7��.�� , am the above -named applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and hereby state that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are, in all respects, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. WHIDDEV ISLANP - � l • t b� P LAG ET �a _ �`4 SOUND ,,.r o ,%) °.1 t� VICINITY MAP , tt - �C.4Lt PROPERTY LINE EXIsT/N` sTlwcru/tcs ------ — — PROPOSED S71LUe-TIRES BOAT woi&TS O GOAT SANITARY TANK puu%piN4 C,o11A1tL.r1oN TIDAL ELEVATION POINT "fI 014 L ELr&v ATI ON CoMTo%i i!DETAIL NUMBER : Q SH GET NuM6E� �i � • - ------ LEGEND - --- PE&MIT APPL I CATION POK : LAE-8UQT0N W"ARF IKc. PURPOSE OF C0143T"CT104: WAVE PROTECTION ¢ FACILITY EXPANSION FAC I L 1 T Y Lo<ATED AT ; I& I I 1 76 fk. PLACE W IisT GITY OF: EDIKONDS COuNTY or-, SNONOIMISH RECEIVED STATE OF: WASHIQr.TO*1 IOU 3 079 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEP1 LAEBUGTON WWARF 1NC. FACT L ITY EXPANSION 071-OY5- 1-00S784S VICINITY MAP AHC LEGEND W 0. P". G1 IT--.i-ot- owwER: gr1R�rNGToN �,(pRTs/FQN R�/cRatD Alo APTAC-EP47 G�A�T4A� BU/tD/Nq sravcrvaEs ,S,OATTc�E, WAS/. - —•— —�. IkE%ISY:N4� 1 RIP RAP - SEA WALL h EXIST/.VG WOODEN l � � TO Be samo vez 1 X % o a.Q i t' Ya7 1 l � 12�v�1 a�rwig f o 1 -- Ix c W�,o 0 0 l - h' 'A1 c / r v►,1/PAL,� ,, 1 1 'IT it.TOR W � 1 RECEIVED ®-u NOV 30'79 Y O CITY OF EDMDNDS z PLANNING DEPT. OWNERS: TAMES NA I NCS 16420 7(.TM- WESr E D Moov OS 0 WASId . f NERBtgT NAIAIE$ . Starscc, 1N�s►J. A14 ADTACE "r 31raucru R Es 3TQ �a EXT. ACCESS PIER EXT. RIP -RA ® (To 5L REveArr-b �; SEA WALL A _ ` MIr URE w In MLLW = O� OFFI LIwE—._ GES �l SHOP R TgKL� ' � �0 1 N C C �-R RAN r i� F_ LE 17 V e`, w r 0-13 r/ q/G B FACI /00 0 SEE DE REgk W4 T _ / j 07 i Tq/4.S- FR p , - J 0 ,RECEIVED NOV 3 0 '79 40 CITY OF EOMONOS PLANNING DEPT. 86' (# 0 — ELE.CStQ— -- - yo 5"' LEviLS- RriSTAuRANT 20 - n. si LE VEL '� MAANA OFF/ [L SM&P n F�j 10 0 - i I 'r 1 -to - �I C7 �I I b 11 .II 9 �' li .'� I� II .'q 'I ,I (1' 11 - I ,P II `� Q 1� 4 n. 1� .4 I� I� a u itLA LI 4�iL I ,.•, Q U LI L u lid RCP _ --►I� 20 �{4---- yr.fj 2(TyOp�' (I'TYP) sTquGTuRE scw�E : R s.l / % S0 ' Va RT i 61� 22s' 100' — 1-- I , 60 - `i0— i — ---- D�Bx�N Ty.B€ kZt ---- -- -- - T ------ --- -- 11 20 --- l? 10 fl v. o 0 _ LI LIII � � � .. O I I I - o► /0- 1 P RAP ��; S WALL- _-REINFORCED GONC�ZETE PILING (RCP) zcO a. c. (TYP ) I RECEIVED NORTH ELV TION CITY OF ED`4ONDS PLANNING DEPT. LAEBu6TON WHARF INC. FACILITY EXPANSIon 071 -MB -1-005715 PROPOSED FACILITY EXPAN S I ON AL � h --- - 0� - �. n IA 11111 �Ipll� 1111111111111111111' FILEDTIFrs lilffiII 11111111 II IIIIIII IN /✓dTO : C. I. P. CONCRETE A--.J (j) p( Q N REQb; TO BR/NG SE CTION _L_� �! �F ro T•+e LE-VCL SHOWN ( idoTE: SEE P ral1-5 FoR Asar-k%aL.Y OF SKeAK WATtR Lisww TH is :po, NT . E L EVATTO N m ■ loop; pLAN( -PATTERN LAY LJT-_ 8' ND •PL^IIK C ,-,�P. � L PATTERN "A" F1Or.FLCiLA*b'-��rp7 �� • Rc/NcoRCED )rvaota�zeD &yL11VON BELTti� USED TMES (TYP) PATTERN uBN ' �i eELEVATION No'res : TNIs T/aE 'Tb 86 F! WIT14 POLYSTYRCA/G ( * � Ci AS t C. ;7L0AT/,AJ Ca, DOuC AS MAD. $Y TbPPER /ND vR eQ- LAEENGTON WHARF INC. FACILITY EXPANSION_ 07 1-CrYB-1- 0051't5 RECEIVED PROPOSED Nov 3 0'?9 FACILITY EXPANSION CITY Of EDMONDS PLANNING DEPT. baAW14 ALCALL& 10.051 E� /o !e 7? T o APPLICATION To: CITY OF EDMONDS'FIRE DEPARTMENT For Permit . r • . s . (DAT / G Jack F. Cooper, Fire Chief Edmonds Fire Department 250 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Sir: In conformity with the terms of the Fire Code, application is hereby made to store,, use pr maintain the fq1- ow ecific materials or processes: the below address: L Name of Firm or Company Address (Street Signature L� Title AM-1 APR 20 1978 . EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. 6 CITY ®F E®f1lONDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMOND& WASHINGTON 98WO (20G) 775.2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT April 7, 1978 Laebughtens Wharf 16111 - 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Sir: HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR Your Fire Department Permit expired December 31st and is now 90 days past due. If the nature of your business or process has changed and no longer requires such a Permit, please advise so we may correct our records. If your Permit renewal is an oversight, please complete the enclosed application andreturn with the Five Dollars ($5.00) renewal fee within fifteen days. On receipt of your renewal application, the.Fire Prevention Bureau will schedule a safety survey within 60 days to as- sist in reducing possible hazards on your premises. Yours for a safer community through fire prevention, f Jack F. Cooper Fire Chief Edmonds Fire Department JFC : amm Enclosure 0 July 25, 1977 r , inspector tter dieted July 19, 1977 . simmons: ievred the contents of your reference letter and find Laebugten rror with respect to our responsibilities. We are, in fact, a protective covering over the exposed portion of the sprinkler above the existing deck. This remaining portion to be covered oes not preclude Laebugten's removal,of any scrap wood as two amps are in place.to allow traffic in and out of the new build- ead doorway. We are currently anticipating the completion of protection of the exposed sprinkler pipe to be accomplished 1977,. thlrespect to providing a protective closure for the sprinkler system ousings,llwe�find that the original City of Edmonds approved construction nor, the sprinkler subcontractors Washington State Rating Bureau approved requiredJ uslto provide such protection. It was explained to the owner, enlWhIarfLt' atfshould such protection be required, it was totally his ability d1notincluded as a portion of the construction contract. As you well know,) a protective house in the area of the existing sprinkler esjlis goiag1tolrequire the possible re -work of the owner's adjacent freezer pment�laad otherli,ems congested in this area. It was also our understanding duriniglltha previous inspections mentioned in your reference letter that department would consider some possible alternatives to actually construct - a isp'rinklerivalve�house inasmuch as the existing structure is all wood. Such gsl� as Istopp�ing lair and water flow through the existing wood deck, covering ting windows v sndlgenerally securing area to flow through traffic would mplishi.the basic equality of a valve house. It II 11 11 1.I1 1 DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACTORS City of Edmonds Page 2 July 25, 1977 We appreciate your concern and prompt response to these matters and certainly hope that we have helped to clarify this matter. Please contact the undersigned at 927-6672 at any time should further information be required by your office. Sincerely yours, R. R. TYDINGS , INC. Richard R. Tydings L President RRT/vn cc: Mr. Ron Hansen Laebugten Fishing Wharf, Inc. Mr. Richard Pierson CITY OF EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR CIVIC CENTER • 6DMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 FIRE DEPARTMENT July 19, 1977 Mr. R. R. Tydings R. R. Tydings, Inc. 4200 South 375th Auburn, WA 98002 S 98 --o+ov- oo 1 Dear Mr. Tydings: On April 27, 1977, members of the Edmonds Fire Prevention Bureau inspected Laebugten Wharf, 16111 76th Place West, Edmonds, Washington. A number of items were listed for correction, two such.items were; (1) Provide protective enclosure for the sprinkler valve house and, (2) Remove waste lumber storage from the dock. On June 16, 1977, June 30, 1977, and again on July 15, 1977, reinspections were made. Mr. Kauffmann advised this Department that Item No. 1 above was the responsibility of the contractor and that in order to remove the wood there must be a ramp constructed over the sprinkler supply pipe. It is our understanding that this is also your responsibility. This letter is to request from you a written schedule by which we can accept completion of these projects. Your prompt attention on this matter will be appreciated. Yours for a safer community through fire prevention, S KIP S �I�nMO�S SKIP SIMMONS Fire Prevention Inspector SS:asd 16 L V) w VU CITY OF 4WAGNDS 01 DG. :DEPT. CONDITIONAL PERMIT WORK- ADDRESS - OWNER. ..APPROVE Q. DATE- -i__.__.__ BY BLDG. OFFICIAL KEEP. THESE' STAMPED PLANS ON JOBSITE FOR ALL INSPECTIONS PERMIT .NU. SHEET F t'T + + CITY..Of Nos-- F DEPARTMER APPROVED SUBOECT TO ANY CHANGES INDICATED,. Examined By I-5K)p SIMMONS IL iAj b' IPA J or- CF�s X. L Ps- 6 V6, Z N W 0 IF 14� I'. g Jri;t is 14 .01 -1A i.Ij q t t J,; L V, CITY QF EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT. APPROVED SUBJECT TO ANY CHANGES INDICATED 'Examined BY I Date at 14 Approved By Jack Cooper, Chief c! :j I VL-7 A k: ASO L I 01C P1 4 I T,- ;11 :30 14 41. A . .1.1 1 . I r r 061 (D�'W 17 5 C'P 975. For use between storage 4anitin underground piping installations. Can be located irEit�ler horizontal or vertical lines. When valve is oped;`1ca�rri;�r and poppet swing completely free of liquid.pj5s69q, 4lwn5 full flaw, lour pressure drop. �2 ��,� �✓ COMMUC71ON DUMB r:.•' ®ody and cap --bronze Disc—buns-N Rated P-',, norms) pressure tines+},f 1�Yj cold narMshock pressu7c limit of,,?00 psi �;T0.-)A0orat e,hmlt: 225°-K SIZES: G•o Similar. to 0;'W 175 exc t it has built-in by- pass valve. in disc to proven4 damage'tcaused by gasoline being- triDplled in line during thermal expansion. By-pass valve opens at approximn-tely 25 psi. SIZES: IV2", 2" (Gfti7 1175. Heavy duty swing check valves for use on exposed lines at bulk plants and other high -volume lines. Carrier plug and stem easily removed for easy servicing or replacement of carrier, disc holder or disc. Body is cast with external boss for drilling and tapping where an external by- pass is desired. Inlet and outlet tapped standard female pipe thread. CORISMUCTIORI DETAILS Body —cast iron Soot ving—brass Disc---buna-IV Czar bronze OPIMATING CONDITIONS Rated at normal pressure limit of 125 psi, cold non -shock pressure limit of 200 psi. Temperature limit: 225° F, SIZES: 3" (threaded cap with metal -to -metal seal to body) G''W 1175-13. Similar to OPW 1175 except it has built-in by-pass valve in disc to prevent damage caused by gasoline being trapped in line during thermal expansion. By-pass valve opens at approximately 25 psi. SIZE: 3" (G� 9 97g-F C"�2 uv G� 1175-F. Similar to D7J 1175 a=c-S2 C 2.-,l C_:; have standard 125 ASA 6'�_rt3m SIZES: 3" �r'Z� 170. Emevgency shW-o',7 o_J�;o Crr C=' 71 C a w L' :. plants. Used at outlet 02 SWC30 4C,1. C2 Q :j or any place jn th2 liquid WcnoFc7 Vao k: 'wZa C, I:-) of fire, it is important to imvo tFy Resists thormal zjk='x . .. baLt IS GCfC c resists fracture when hat anal thcn from fire hose. Valve closos aut®MOTIcallCy In Coco C1 C:. . is joined by fusible metal. When tho iiri% { , lever pin, it holds in "open" paoition. fire, the fusible metal molts at -'1GZ°, �7w:. sir: f to close and prevent fur her poss-1130 Of Full coating, tight shut-c'O ... a com�tonm, *'.3 iC between the disc holda7 and cevrlov. Til�ii� ?,3 disc quickly and correctly each Lima Mo salvo tC cts —; r _ mitting tight seaVng and taking full C:b"�ti<ti C� t-_) t; load on the disc. CONSTRUCTION DIMILs Body and cap --ductile iron Paching nut and stop—staintess stcol Disc—buna-hI Stem soal—buna-id 0-ring OPIFRATING COM997MB Rated at normal pressure limll 04 223 Rai, CQ"- rZT pressure limit of 200 psi. 7om3;cmLk a Ut.^ 3: 4? '' Fusible link melts at 1600 F. SIZE: 2" 17g-S. Similar to DPW 170 ottcept it cut around body at th-- point wh= tho t fusible link are joined. If tho volvo io nt32a (4, the body of the valve would to d to bma4 z t VG 3 C; , C,,: ZZ" Disc would then remain P= to etoe2 and pmvo,-,J CJ,auu-� liquid escaping from tha lino. SIZE: 2" �UMERICAL INDEX r PRODUCT NO. PAGE 8 15 10-C 10-EMS, 164 10 RB,10-RE 10•R�VII,10-RF 10-RFB 10-RM, 10-RMb, 10-RMS, 10-RP, 10-RU, 10-RUB, 10-RUS, 10-RW, 10-S 2, 3, 4 14, 148, 14SL 5 15, 15-B, 15-DS, 15-S 15-US 9 16-AD, 16-AF, 16-AU 8 21 9 22 9 23 19 M-24-1 19 32, 32-E, 32-H 5 35 24 37-E, 37-H 6 42 8 C-45-1 19 48 15 49 6 50-A 7 52, 52-A 7 53 11 54 11 60 21 60-L 21 60-T 22 61-AF 21 61-AP 23 61-AS 20 61-PS 21 61-S 20 61-ST 21 61-T 23 62, 62-TT 20 INDEX OMERICAL INDEX ALMUIKTMK NUMSAL INDEX NUMERICAL NO. PAGE PRODUCT NO. PAGE PIMCT PRODUCT NO. PAGE PRODUCT .,.+ 63 19 176 16 951, 951-E, 95143A 17,18 Extractor 69, 69-SL 8 205 23 952, 952-E, 952-EM 17,18 Fill Boxae 82 24 211 G 16 26 1001 1001-E, Fill Caps i An 83 24 212 161-ET 17.18 s 85 10 228 16 1002,1002-E 17,18 FUlpipe b Ili 86 H-87-MI 10 19 233 233-E 18 18 1003,1003-E,10030, 1003-ETY,1003-HL, Foot Valve GateVNra 88 6 233-P 18 1003-HR 17.18 1.0. Markars 88-AA, 88-C 88-E 7 6 234, 234A, 234-AL, 234-L 12 1004,1004-f;, 1004 HC 17,18 (rife -Safer 25 89. 91 7 10 269 287, 287-B, 287S 26 26 1005,1005-E 17 Lubricants Manhole 13.14 >; 92 10 304 14 1051,1051 E, 51,105 17,18 Mamie g 13 93 93 A 8 7 308 349 16 6 1010 1-ET 17.18 Bracket MaMole FNI Cap .; 93-U 98 8 24 349-DP, 349-OPA 349-E, EM, 349•T, 7 1053 1 53 1054-E 17 AssemMies anhole Wrimellift 14 19 a ^1 99, 99•A 13 TE 349-TE 6 1206,1206.E 12 Remote PM�p ''• 104,104-A 104-AN, 104-B,164-AX 13 586 633-F, 633-FT, 633•T, 10 4911 H-7407-1 4 19 9" Valve - 244 105 106 Series 13 26 633 TE 633-TET, 633-TEX 22 23 PRODUCT PAGE Wrenches Saner Teak IIMeM 4 +1, 26 109 110, 110S, 110-SL 11 11 634TE , 634-TT 634-TP 22 P3 Air Control Valves 12 Soling CM PNN SeslingTge 25 25 114-D 19 636-T. 636-TT 23 Angle Check Valves 5.6 Service Blouse ry 116 24 821, 821-B 25 Angle Check Installations Co timid 2 122 15 822 25 Valve Wrenches 7 , ;*. 126,126-A 14 880 25 Automatic Tiro Resisle Vents 126-AB 15 882 25 Inflators 28 . 126-AH 126 B 14 24 884 885 25 25 Bushings 11 submemid Hill >�' 2g 126-C 19 886 25 Check Valve Cages Compressor Check 7 soctioe Tank 126-0 24 891 10 137� 14 901,902 17,18 Valve Emergency Eyewash 12 138,138-LH 139 16 26 Ball Valve Extractor,Ass'ys 4 17-18 lhdaa Unloe EA'nie 726. ; ;•:; 148, 148-A 24 �'.„ Ya +1 Venial CAeek VahMe THE OQIN 10-R �D, SERIE5,00 a ed WY -oat-, Damage from overturning, ground heave, or freezing can cause the top shear section to break off and close the valve. The 10-R Series has a Replaceable top shear section that can be attached with just three bolts. Then reengage the hub link to open the valve again and reset the spring loaded latch. The OPW 10-R Series Remote Pump Shut -Off Valves offer these 4 "plus" features: Straight through flow. When the valve is opened, the poppet is oul of the way. There's nothing to cause a change in flow direction, nothing to cause unnecessary pressure loss. That's straight through flow ... more gallons delivered in less time. Can be manually shut-off no need to shut down pumpinf system to repair.or remove the pedestal. Just release the hub lino of OPW 10-R for immediate positive shut-off just below the pedes. tal. Can be manually reset without having to shut down pumpini system. Just rotate hub link and engage fusible link. Built-in air test port . . . makes it possible to test the entire pumping system pneumatically after the installation is complete - without breaking the line. Na vise wnwe nEt.clM RAM Rae ssl��R ThvraM ceerEe h,a. . � OF PROM WT yt OVUM ANT WT MI STAMMM STEM. P0"ET ,..,• "TANDIS,MMe PAT. N0. 2,9659 PAT. NO. 3,489, LISTED BY UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES INC 2 (cl 197A nnvpp rnap - npw nr' PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AGENDA FOR EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION �CEIVED COUNCIL CHA14BERS - 7:30 P.M. JUNE 8. 1977 J U N 6 1977 EDMONDS FIRE DEPT. 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. CORRESPONDENCE 4. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION 5. CONTINUED -77 STANLEY KAUFFtIAN - Approval of the Contract rezorYing property rom RS-20 to CW, at northwest corner of 75th West and 162nd S.W., subject to certain conditio s. 6. AGENDA R-4-77 PATRICK J. HAGEN - Proposed rezone from RS-20 to RS- Lots 3-5 .Plat of Talbot Park PRD-2-77 "THE COILMO11S" - Planned Residential Development - 0 dwelling units - located on 80th Avenue West, West of 1.94th Place SW (RS-8) APPLICANT: Bob Pantley ZO-5-77 Amend Chap. 12.15 to insert abatement provisions for non -conforming units in multi -family buildings. June 7, 1977 MEMO TO: Joe Wallis Community Development Director. FROM: Jack F. Cooper Fire Chief SUBJECT: FUEL STORAGE TANKS I am happy to inform you that this Department has always coordinated the installation of fuel storage tanks prior to issuing any permits. As to your second paragraph of your May 23 memo stating that Mr. Kauffman or his representative made an application to this department, this statement is, in fact, not true. Mr. Kauffman only discussed the matter with me personally and with my inspector, Skip Simmons. I advised Mr. Kauffman that this Department had no objec- tions to such an installation, but that he must clear with all other Departments prior to making an application for a permit. This would include clearing with your office, the Building officials, the Engineering officials, the Land Management officials, the Coast Guard, the Ecology Depart- ment and anyone else with the slightest interest in his tanks. Again, thank you for your concern, and we will continue to cooperate with your Department. JFC:gk May 23, 1977 MEMO TO: Jack Cooper Fire Chief FROM: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: FUEL STORAGE TANKS V ED ,Y 26 197 )NDS FIRE DEPT. It has come to my attention that there may be applications to the Fire Department for installation of fuel storage tanks on land that is not zoned to permit such a use. I am requesting that all such applications be reviewed by the Planning Division to determine if the use conforms to the established zoning. The issue which precipitated this request, was an application to the Fire Department by Mr. Stan Kauffman, or his representa- tive Mr. Tydings, for a 5,000 gallon fuel storage tank at the northwest corner of 75th and 162nd S.W. The zoning on this property is residential (RS-20), which does not permit such a land use. Therefore, Mr. Kauffman has made an application to the City to rezone this corner from RS-20 to CW (Commercial Waterfront). This item has been scheduled on the City Planning Commission Agenda of May 25, 1977, a copy of which is attached. No fuel storage facility permits may be issued for this site until a rezone is approved by the City Council. NC/le Attachment PLEASE NOTE: APPLICANT:OR.REPRESENTATIV.E MUST B.E'PRESENT AGENDA FOR EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION. COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:30 P.M. MAY 25, 1977 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3. CORRESPONDENCE. 4. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION 5. AGENDA R-2-7.7 STANLEY KAUFMAN - Contract Rezone from RS-20- to CW. at northwest corner of 75th West F 162nd SW., PRD 1-77 SEAVIEW PINES 2 Planned Residential.Develo ment ,� P •south side o 194th Street SW at 89th Place'West . (RS=12) Applicant: Bjorn Theusen R-3-77 B16RN THEUSEN -.Rezone from RS-8 to RD on 82nd Place West,,,south of 84th Avenue West (W.00dlake Park) ZO-6-77 Amend Sec. 12.14.020 to reduce the sizeof parking spaces to.recognize.,the fact that many cars today are smaller sub -compact cars. Applicant: Frank Taylor ZO-5-77 Amend Chapter 12.15 to insert abatement provisions. for nonconforming.units in multi -family buildings EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION May 25, 1977 The regular meeting of the Edmonds Planning Commission was .called to order by V Chairman Larry Naughten at_7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds. Civic Center. Chairman Naughten welcomed those present and explained the procedure of the meeting. PRESENT Larry Naughten Fred Ross John McGibbon Keith LaBelle Ray Sittauer Laura Hall Tom Carns, Ex officio APPROVAL OF MINUTES ABSENT STAFF PRESENT C. Richard Goodhope Noelle Charleson, Asst. City Planner Valina Walker, Dick Allen, Asst. City Engineer Richard Dickson John Wallace, City Attorney Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk The minutes of the meeting of May 1.1, 1977 had been posted, mailed, and distributed. COMMISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LaBELLE, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 11, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA Chairman Naughten announced that ZO-5-77 would not be heard this evening because the notification was not published in the newspaper. fie said it would be on the June 8 agenda. R-2-77 STANLEY KAUFFMANN - Contract Rezone from RS-20 to CW at northwest corner of 75th W. and 162nd S.W. Ms. Charleson said the purpose of the proposed contract rezone was to permit a fuel storage facility which will be buried beneath'the ground. She explained the difference between a contract rezone and an ordinary rezone. She said the applicant was proposing certain conditions which would be part of the rezone: (1) The tank would be buried; (2) He will landscape the site; and (3) No further structure would ever be located on the site. These conditions would be considered to be a part of the contract, and only the uses stated by the applicant would be permitted. The reason for the action was that he wanted to put in a larger fuel storage tank for Laebugten Wharf. The applicant owns Lots 1 through 10 of the plat, but only Lot 10 was proposed for the contract rezone and Pls. Charleson stressed that Lots 1 through 9 would not be affected. Ms. Charleson indicated that all the surrounding property except for the wharf and the railroad was single family. She.showed slides of the property and noted that the site is covered with blackberry bushes and there are springs on the property. The tank proposed to be placed on the site would replace the 1,000 gallon tank presently located on the wharf, the new tank being of 5,000 gallon capacity. Part of the reason for locating the tank underground was that the Uniform Fire Code does not permit tanks of this size on a dock. -The tank :is.5'.x 17' and will be buried 2' underground. Ms. Charleson said the site would be landscaped to appear attractive after the tank is buried, and 10' of the west portion of the site would be dedicated to help the access to 75th W. The tank would be filled by. a truck approximately twice a month, and the fuel lines would go from the tank, under the railroad. tracks, to the dock. A lease agreement would exist between Laebugten Wharf and the user of the site, so there could potentially be two different owners at some future time. City Attorney John Wallace interjected that ownership is not relevant to the rezone question. Ms. Charleson noted strengths and weaknesses of the proposal. She said that from the fire safety standpoint this site,would be the safest location for the tank, and that it could not be located on the dock; no permanent structure could ever be located on the site so it would be permanent open space, preserving some neighborhood views; no traffic would be generated and a pull-out area could be established for parking of the fuel truck. Regarding weaknesses of the proposal, Ms. Charleson said this is an established, low density, large lot, single family neighborhood into which a commercial intrusion would be created. There would be a fuel truck arriving to fill the tank and, although the hours of delivery could be restricted, the restriction would be difficult to enforce; maintenance of the site would be difficult to enforce and trash, litter, and oil from the tank could accumulate; there was the possibility that some future. owner might not be as conscientious as the applicant about the maintenance of the site; although the fuel tank itself would not create a traffic. problem, larger amounts of available fuel could help to create more activity at the wharf (Commissioner Sittauer said that was not a valid assumption as the smaller tank would simply be filled more often); the Comprehensive Land Use Plan approved this year does not indicate this land as commercial, but as single family, the City Council having examined each area of the City to see where commercial expansion could be accom- plished and not so designating this area; open space would also be pre- served by keeping the site RS-20;.and the. road between the site and the wharf now makes a good separation between the two zones. She then recommended the proposal be denied as it conflicts with the planned land use for the area, represents a use not compatible with a low density, single family neighborhood, and it is far from the commercial center of the town. She felt the conditions of the contract may be difficult to enforce and that there were alternatives for providing fuel by placing fuel tanks west of the railroad. She felt that for the long range planning of the area the single family residential zoning was the best use of this property. Assistant City Engineer Dick Allen said he had checked with industrial facilities and that there was no safety problem with the underground storage tanks. The public portion of the hearing was then opened. Stanley Kauffmann said he really did not want a rezone, that he had assumed he could do this with a Conditional Use Permit. He said he was not. in favor of spot zoning and only wanted to put the tank in a safer location. He said the hazard is greater by having the tank on the pier and the larger tank would eliminate some of the traffic for -refueling. He said the wharf has added to the community and he has had all but one party who objected to it return and congratulate him on the appearance. fie said there is all kinds of rubbish on this site under the berry bushes and it will be a policing problem no matter who owns the property. He felt it should go back to its natural state after the tank is buried. Chairman Naughten said the file had a letter from Phyllis.1-liggins of 16012 74th Pl. W. who was concerned with the word "commercial." She interpreted that to mean more traffic problems and recommended fir. Kauffmann be given a waiver from the residential restrictions without rezoning to commercial. Glen Loboud.gerof 15920 72nd W. asked if this came under the purview of the Shorelines Management Act, and Ms. Charleson responded that if it falls within 200' of shoreline he will be required to get a shoreline permit. Mr. Loboudger also wanted the definition of "structure," and City Attorney John Wallace advised that the applicant would be limited only to the use that he requests and he cannot come in later and add something else. Mr.Loboudger objected to the encroachment'of a commercial activity in a residential area. Cliff Lawson of 16221 75th P1. W. spoke in opposition, saying that even prior to annexation the area had been RS-20. He said he had vacant land he wished to develop and felt everyone should have the same restrictions. Shirley Hall of 432 Olympic said the EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 - May 25, 197.7 site would not change visually in any way by having the tank installed and that there would be less traffic created by the delivery truck. Don Davenport of 19927 31st Pl. W. felt the larger fuel tank would be a convenience factor for boaters in the area, noting that they have run out of fuel in the Edmonds boat harbor. He pointed out that many homes have fuel trucks delivering oil and that was no different from this kind of delivery. William Scott of 320 120th, Everett, said he had a power of attorney to represent John Sanderlin whose property is immediately to the south of this site. He felt the larger tank would increase the business at the wharf and that the traffic had already been increased there. He felt the applicant was not going by the same rules as others must follow. Chairman Naughten explained that the applicant was only following the procedures given him by the City Staff. Cliff Lawson asked Ms. Charleson to explain how this matter had come to light, and she responded that the item came to the attention of the Planning Department through some phone calls, one being from Mr. Lawson. She said she investigated and found the owner was Mr. Kauffmann, and she explained to him that such a use would not be permitted in a single family zone. His attorney then contacted the City Attorney and action was then followed up by the Planning Department. Skip Simmons, Fire Inspector for the City, said the Fire Department recom- mended the underground tank be permitted from the safety viewpoint as it is the safest way to store fuel. Regarding maintenance and upkeep, he said there are City ordinances governing that and inspection people to see they are enforced. He questioned whether the contract rezone would apply to a future owner or manager. He was advised that the contract is entered into by the applicant and the City and is recorded, binding any future owners, and can be changed only by going back through the rezone process. Alex Taylor, Richmond Beach resident, said he previously had lived at 19004 84th W. and that it was always difficult.to get a boat into the water in Edmonds. He said Mr. Kauffmann had improved the wharf property and had contributed to the City, and he felt his application should be approved. Joan Miller of 16131 75th W., directly across from the site, commented that this is a slide area and that they have had water pipes break because of this. She was concerned that the fuel pipes could break. Mr. Kauffman explained that the tank will have a double fuel line system, that'it is safer than natural gas lines. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Skip Simmons stated that the Fire Code specifically addresses buoyancy areas, requiring that the tanks be anchored. He said there will be many extra precautions taken with valves in a slide area. He said he had dis- cussed this with Planning Department personnel and disagreed with their recommendation for disapproval. The applicant was asked if he could come up with an alternative location for the tank and he said he could not, that the Coast Guard and Fire Department establish where it can be placed. Commissioner Sittauer said he had to agree with the Fire Inspector with regard to fire safety in this matter. He said he ordinarily is against contract rezones in residential areas, but in this case it was logical. and would not be detrimental to the neighborhood. THEREFORE, COMMISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER McGIBBON, THAT R-2-77 BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 8 AT WHICH TIME THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT THE CONTRACT WITH THE SAFETY STIPULATIONS, AND THAT THE HEARING PROCESS IS COMPLETED. MOTION CARRIED. A short recess was announced. PRD-1-77 SEAVIEW PINES #2 - Planned Residential Development south side of 194th St. S.W. at 89th Pl. W. (RS-12) Applicant: Bjorn Theusen Ms. Charleson explained for the audience how a PRD is different from other subdivisions. She showed the location on a vicinity map and noted it is surrounded by single family zoning. She noted that it is in an environmentally sensitive area because of the steep slopes on the site. EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 3 - May 25, 1977 9 She said the density cannot be increased in a PRO, nor can the building heights, and the Amenities Design Board must review the site plan. She then showed slides of the site. There is stubstantial vegetation on the site and a steep ravine. The site plan was displayed, showing 6 proposed houses, with access from the north and over the ravine. Three of the houses will be on the south portion of the site which is level. The applicant proposed to landscape a strip to buffer ,the existing house directly northeast of the site. No trees over 8" in diameter will. be cut unless they_are located in the building pads or driveways. An 8' rockery will be constructed to cross the stream, probably the smallest sized rockery that could be.put there. There will be some slope of the driveway to get into the site. Ms. Charleson reviewed the actions taken at the preliminary hearing. of February 23, 1977. Regarding the environ- mental impact, she said there would be some movement of earth in building and the conditions here are particularly sensitive because of the slope. She said the three lots located on the stream should have very minimum filling and grading so as not to impact the ravine. Ground water quality may deteriorate somewhat, but not significantly, and runoff will be slightly increased. The cars will generate some noise and air polution but 6 houses are estimated to create 24 automobile trips per day, and that should not create a significant adverse impact in the neighborhood. Existing fire and police services are adequate to handle this subdivision.. Ms. Charleson felt the impacts would not be adverse, so a finding of no significant adverse impact had been made. She recommended approval.of the application, subject to: (1) Designing the rockery so that a small strip along either side of the railing is provided for planting ivy or other landscaping so that the rockery will evenually be covered. The applicant was agreeable to this. (2) The Amenities Design Board should review the designs of the.three houses located on the steep slope to assure that the slope and ravine are not impaired due to excessive grading and filling. Ms. Charleson showed slides of types of houses the builder contemplates and also examples of houses built on poles to avoid extensive foundation work. Bjorn Theusen said he planned..to.do a minimum of grading and would bring in the material for filling rather than taking it from the site. He said the ravine is an asset and he would not destroy it. He pointed out that the green belt would be 17,000 sq. ft., and he said he did not mind restrictions. He said he would prefer not having to go to the Amenities Design Board because he had already had four hearings on this. He said he had spoken with Larry Reiner, the owner of the property directly adjacent to the access to the site, and Mr. Reiner was satisfied with the planned buffer. Virginia Knouse of 9110 192nd S.W., whose property borders the ravine to the north, asked who would be responsible for the bridge and whether it would be a dedicated City street. Assistant City Engineer Dick Allen responded that it would be dedicated to the City. Mrs. Knouse also asked who would be responsible for the ravine. Ms. Charleson said the common open area would be owned jointly by the six owners and they would be responsible for the maintenance. Fred Knause said the ravine area had become a play area for the children,and they were not supervised and trash accumu- lated. He thought there should be a requirement for a low stone wall that would fit in with the ravine but discourage traffic. He also asked if storm drains could be put in from the low point of the bridge down to the storm sewer to prevent more change in the stream from runoff. Mr. Allen said the plans are reviewed in detail regarding drainage and there are various alternatives for dispersing the water. Carol Chaudierre. of 8909 196th S.W. felt the houses should be spread out more in the development in order to save the large trees. She said the large trees are located where the houses will be located. E. A. Taylor of 19308 189th P1. W. saw no objection to the PRO and he thought it would con- tribute to the area. The question was raised as to whether tree cutting EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 - May 25, 1977 restrictions could be imposed.indefinitely on the people who purchase the property in the PRD. City Attorney John Wallace responded that the devleoper could put any additional covenants on it. Mr. Theusen pointed out that tree cutting restrictions are fine, but he pointed out that different people have different wishes in this regard, that one adjoining neighbor had already asked him if he could takeout some additional trees because it is so dark. He said there are 20 trees in the 25' perimeter of the PRD, some of which are 24" in diameter. He said he would do all he could to save the trees, and that there would be restrictions against cutting trees in the ravine. Elaine Harris of 8907 196th S.W. said she recognized that there are times when trees have to be cut, but she said discriminatory cutting must be accomplished. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. There was some discussion regarding the responsibility of the open area. Commissioner Sittauer then commented that the PRD was good for this particular property because of the contour of the land and COMMISSIONER SITTAUER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LaBELLE, THAT PRD-1-77 BE APPROVED WITH THE STIPULATION THAT IT BE PLACED IN THE COVENANT THAT TREE CUTTING RESTRICTIONS BE PLACED ON TREES 8" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER IN THE BOTTOM PART OF THE RAVINE; RESPONSIBILITY OF POLICING THE OPEN SPACE WILL BE THAT OF EACH OF THE PURCHASERS WHO OWN 1/6 OF THAT OPEN SPACE; AND WITH ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS. City Attorney John Wallace commented that the usual home owners association provides for a governing body that will allow tree cutting, etc. He said that is best handled within the home owners association, but there will be some situations when it is necessary to have the City come in as the enforcing party, but they should be only special instances wherein the City has a definite interest. MOTION THEN CARRIED. R-3-77 BJORN THEUSEN - Rezone from RS-8 to RD on 82nd Pl. W., south'.of 84th Ave. W.(I,1oodlake Park) Ms. Charleson said this site is a cul-de-sac and the property is surrounded by multiple zoned property on three sides and single family property on one side. This had come in before as a single family plat, but now a rezone was being requested for eight of the lots on the western half of the plat; and only where a lot abuts a multiple zone was the rezone to duplex being requested. Ms. Charleson displayed a.site plan, noting that the height limitation for duplex is 25', for multiple it is 35', and for single family it is 25' for a flat roof and 30' for a pitched roof. She said there is a definite transition problem from the multiple apartments, and duplex was the best proposal for transition at this location. She said the major impact would be that.of traff.i.c.and an:i.ncrease in.;densi.ty, but the..automobile traffic would have the largest increase. In; relation to measuring the impacts she had determined that there would not be a significant adverse impact, but the cumulative effect, together with the adjoining apartments, would be considerable. Ms. Charleson said she generally was not in favor of rezones, but she felt this one was justified. She recommended approval. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Bjorn Theusen explained the problems of single family housing abutting multiple. He said he had received requests from many people wishing to buy duplex units to have one for a rental. He said the nature (of housing is changing, and these units essentially would be condominiums, the lots being large enough to have one story plus a basement units. Commissioner McGibbon commented that efforts had been made to reduce the density in the City, and this was going in the opposite direction. He said he could see requests coming in for duplexes all over town where multiple zoning abuts single family. Several people in the audience spoke•agaiitinst this application citing traffic problems, increased density, lack of maintenance by renters as opposed to homeowners. They included Bill Meyers. of 21015 81st Pl. W.., Monty flitter .of 20924 81st P1. W., Mike Carr of 20-927 81st. Pl. W., Scott Ray of 20918 81st P1. W., Willard Anderson of 20g,111 81st P1. W EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 5 - May 25, 1977 Thomas Sharp of 21018 81st P1. W., and Duane Cubbin of 21106 81st P1. W. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. .Chairman 11aughten noted that nine letters were in the file from neighbors in opposition to this rezone application. Commissioner Ross expressed the opinion that this would not be detrimental to the neighborhood as the density would be increased very little. He felt anyone paying approximately $90,000 for a duplex would see that it is well maintained. Mr. Theusen was asked why he decided to change to the duplex concept. He replied that the market had changed and duplexes were in high demand, but primarily because of the apartments which were built adjoining his property - -although he was aware of .the multiple zoning at the time he started his own project. Commissioner McGibbon said there was some logic to what the applicant advocates, but that from a planning point of view there was considerable pressure to lower density. He said this proposal placed the Commission in the position of being at cross purposes, and he was skeptical of the advisability of this rezone. COMMISSIONER LaBELLE THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER'McGIBBON, THAT R-3-77 BE DENIED BECAUSE HE WAS NOT CON- VINCED IT WAS NECESSARY TO DEVELOP A BUFFER ZONE IN THIS AREA AND BECAUSE IT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DENSITY POLICY WHICH THE COMMISSION GENERALLY HAD ADOPTED IN THE PAST. MOTION CARRIED, WITH COMMISSIONER ROSS VOTING NO. ZO-6-77 Amend Sec. 12.14.020 to reduce the size of parking spaces to recognize the fact that many cars today are smaller, subcompact cars. Applicant: Frank Taylor Ms. Charleson said the applicant's feeling was that parking standards should be changed to accommodate smaller cars, his proposal ibeing that of the two required parking spaces for apartments one of them should be a smaller space for subcompact cars. She said other jurisdictions permit smaller parking spaces only if the required number of standard size parking spaces have been provided. She said some open space might be gained by this proposal, and some reduced paving which would be a savings to the developer, but a problem might be that the larger cars mould try to parkin the smaller spaces. Frank Taylor said he is going tZ build a 27-unit condominium and his architect is trying to save trees and have less blacktopping. Mr. Taylor quoted some research material from the Seattle Times which indicated that 53% of the new cars sold in the Seattle area in 1975 were subcompacts, and in 1976 it was 44%. He said, in most cases these cars are approximately 4' shorter than standard size cars and the width is at least 6" less. He said he would like to see half of the parking unit sizes be 8z' x 16'. It was noted that there recently. also has been publicity regarding high sales of the larger cars. Commis- sioner Sittauer said he thought this sounded like a good idea, but he felt there should be more study done on it. The public portion of the hearing was opened, no one wished to speak, and the public portion was closed. COMMISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALL, THAT ZO-6-77 BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 22, WITH. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROVIDIN: A STUDY OF THE PRESENT RATIO OF SMALL CARS TO LARGE CARS IN USE. MOTIZI CARRIED. There was no further business to come before the Commission, and the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 p.m. EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 6 - May 25, 1977 MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 24, 1977 Joe Wallis Community Development Division Jack F. Cooper Fire Chief CONTRACT RE -ZONE FOR TWO File kR- -77 2) FiTEL STORAGE TANKS This is written in answer to your questions of memo dated May 20, 1977. 1) If Mr.. Kauffman locates the tanks on the Laebugten Pock what fire safety measures must he meet? Not allowed. As indicated y Section .7 of t e Uni orm Fire Code.and by Section 7115, NFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible Liquid Code, tanks supplying marine service stations shall be on shore. 2) If the tanks are located in the ground at the proposed re -zone site, what ire sa et 'measures must be taken? See attache�F— copies for i- ig TEing. These are minimum standards. If needed, stronger controls may be exercised by the Fire Chief. 3) What alternatives are available to Mr.'Kauffman besides the two indicated above? The only available alternative per code is to construct a solid -fill type pier to place the tank on. It is the recommendation of the Fire Department that both tanks be located on shore atthe proposed re -zone site. We feel this is the safest location, would be the easiest to protect from fire, and would present the fewest problems to all persons concerned. Furthermore, it is our recommendation that the fuel from these tanks be pumped from this location to a dispensing point on the dock. The location of these tanks at this site should also reduce the amount of fuel truck traffic to this location. SS:gk May 20, 1977 TIP MEMO TO: Jack Cooper Fire Chief FROM: SUBJECT: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Dept. CONTRACT RE -ZONE FOR TWO (2) FUEL STORAGE TANKS (FILE #R-2-77) This is written to request you to outline in a memo the fire safety issues involved in this proposed rezone. Mr. Stanley Kauffman, owner of Laebugten Wharf, has requested a contract re -zone for property located on the northwest corner of 75th and 162nd (see attached map). The proposal is to re- zone this property from single family (RS-20) to commercial (CW) to permit two (2) 5,000 gallon fuel storage tanks (see detailed plans enclosed). The tanks will be buried in the ground at the subject site. It is assumed that Mr. Kauffman will connect the tanks to the dock by pipes running under the street and under the railroad tracks. Noelle Charleson, Assistant City Planner, will be handling this meeting and she would appreciate it if you could prepare a memo for our files addressing the following issues: 1) If Mr. Kauffman locates the tanks on the Laebugten dock, what fire safety measures must he meet? 2) If the tanks are located in the ground at the proposed re- zone site, what fire safety measures must be taken? 3) What alternatives are available to Mr. Kauffman besides the two indicated above? NC/ae CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Teiephone (206) 775-2525 Mr. Stan Kauffman 16111- 76th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 April 27, 1977 RE: Laebugten Wharf 16111-76th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 File Code: 898-000-001 Dear Stan: Regarding our conversations pertaining to the protection need around the Fire Department connection for your sprinkler system, I am directing this letter to you as the property owner rather than the contractor. Listed below are some additional requirements requested by the Fire Department: �tL 1. Provide physical protection around the Fire Department connection (22-inch pipe mounted in concrete). �d 2. Provide protective enclosure around sprinkler valves (valve house) . mg- 3. Provide heat in valve house other than heat lamps. ej,�-4. Provide lock open device for compressor switch. � b 04qj 5. Provide fire extinguishers in new building, maximum O A� travel distance 75 feet, minimum rating 2:A-10:B,C v �y�b'so- 6. Remove waste lumber storage from near approach ramp. I r P O* 7. Place standpipe hose bib in service. L &rT- 8. Prior to installation of sprinkler system some protection was provided by a series of 12-inch standpipes along the north side of the building. This system is now inoperative. To provide the maximum amount of protection for the unsprinklered portion of the dock, this system should be replaced. Service of domestic water should prove adequate. Yours for. a safer community through fire prevention. Sincerely, /2 %? %U V S Jack F. Cooper, Fire Chief s�PnWr . SS:gk Skip Simmons, Inspector CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 April 27, 1977 Mr. Stan Kauffman 16111- 76th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Laebugten Wharf 16111-76th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 File Code: 898-000-001 Dear Stan: Regarding our conversations pertaining to the.protection need around the Fire Department connection for your sprinkler system, I am directing this letter to you as the property owner rather than the contractor. Listed below are some additional requirements requested by the Fire Department: 1. Provide physical protection around the Fire Department connection (22-inch pipe mounted in concrete). 2. Provide protective enclosure around sprinkler valves (valve house). 3. Provide heat in valve house other than heat lamps. 4. Provide lock open device for compressor switch. 5. Provide fire extinguishers in new building, maximum travel distance 75 feet, minimum rating 2:A-10:B,C 6. Remove waste lumber storage from near approach ramp. 7. Place standpipe hose bib in service. 8. Prior to installation of sprinkler system some protection was provided by a series of 12-inch standpipes along the north side of the building. This system is now inoperative. To provide the maximum amount of protection for the unsprinklered portion of the dock, this system should be replaced. Service of domestic water should prove adequate. Yours fora safer community through fire prevention. Sincerely, Jack F. Cooper, Fire Chief SS: k Skip Simmons, Inspe�tor Dt. Exec. Dt. M.A.A. Dt. �. ; INEADOWDAL E I ► + 27 W F 158 t h. ST S. W. O I .i 7 ' I L Qlj: S E or Gc/t.! .N E. Co. Gov1 �1 / 7 ` — - I 57 i < 3 61 � /7 1 (vim - -- - — - 18 e .121 < 9' v oN /0 I SW. Cor, Gov' ,Lot'H c APR Z c 191 6iy )I l_tiltt0ltJi c:unuu�:nity Dc vel. Do)L r' } i •�:. November 29, 1976: l 6 MEMO TO: BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBERS FROM: HARRY WHITCUTT .r SUBJECT: BA-5-76�- Laeburten Wharf 3_ The following data applies to the above appeal: . 1) Occupancy: F-l'(Boat Storage) °.: 2) Type Construction New Building; IV-14 (Sprinkler-ed) Old Building V-14 (Sprinklers to be installed as part of this -permit) 3) Section 1;01 UPC 1973 does not permit plastic materials in commercial structures. i ;r i3uilding; 0 f c_ 1 vi HMW/ae attachment i NOTICE OF PUBLIC IIEARI14G Board of Appeals All interested persons are hereby notified that Monday,: the 20th day of December, 1976, has been set.as the date .for hearing by the Edmonds Board of 'Appeals for review. of BA-5-76. Applicant. is Olympic .Plumbing, Inc., requesting the use of'ABS plumbing for waste and vent in construction located .at 16111-76th Place West in lieu of cast iron. Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Annex Building of the Civ ic is Center Edmonds,.Washington. Ir. ene Y rVarne Moa n` City Clerk City of Ednionds File No. BA-5-76 Publish December 8, 1976 APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS (Reference Current UBC) CITY OF EDMONDS FILE NO. BA-5-76 Edmonds, Washington DATE FEE $10.00 APPL !CANT jADDRESS : ' y:i . lli",' ' PHONE: OWNER: C' �� ���`` ADDRESS: C�.� / a°i _ PHONE: ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: r USE ZONE: FIRE ZONE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED: ^M!D� G� ►�z;/�> ��,o !'' VARIANCE 'REQUESTED: Z�l, je,° SPECIFIC PROVISION OF CODE INVOLVED: STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR REQUEST:( !� � + � (� /3,i'% .✓fir/ .! � . .�. ��1L_C�.i.1/ _. l��i��'L_--L�,'��i'i?`/_i'1'!i1 _t�./�iii]7 .�.:7's�,L,C:-_� .f:•-�'� ,C]iT.7�"d if. CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Building Department Mr. Keith V. Wright The Wright Company 34839 Pacific Highway South Federal Way; Washington 98002 Dear Sir: March 24, 1975 Re: Laebugten Wharf 16111-76th Place West This is to inform you that the plans received by this office, In respect to the above project, are presently being reviewed by the City on a preliminary basis only, pending a formal permit application with complete plans. In order to accept a permit application the following additional plans and specifications are required: I. Complete design details, including structural calculations and erection details, of metal building. 2. Complete design details, including soil test report, structural calculations and drawings, of pier structure. 3. Complete details of any alterations to existing building, including provisions for automatic sprinkler system. 4. Complete details of boat elevator, sewage disposal system, boat racks, ventilation, storage of hazardous materials, etc. 5. Construction details of material and attachment of architectural amenities. 6. A copy of preliminary review by the Fire Department is enclosed. 7. Preliminary review by the building department indicates that building must be protected by I -Hour construction on south wall within 20 feet of property line per section 2103 Uniform Building Code. 4 Page #2 March 24, 1975 Laebugten Wharf 8. The Planning Department preliminary review indicates that plans are incomplete for a determination of building height. Please furnish the required information in order that we may determine a plan check fee and accept a permit application. HMW/ae cc: Fire Dept. Planning Engineering Very truly yours, EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT__ 44�'� *-;/y , Harry M. Whitcutt Building Official G