Loading...
16111 76TH PL W.PDF16111 76TH PL W M-)DRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 00,5-13 rl D 81490 77 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: COI41/YZ��L�jr%S�Z 4fA? ichw COpyvwv� 0/y 414 `odG ;�y 770Z0yV2-,;. r CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: p SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: V5 SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: //9" ?�!- OTHER: LID BLOCK: LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc I ( i I 1 i I j ! 410 I ' t � 7 !� ' - 2 2 - i3 _ 7 I Shyrgse6a 1/���� A • r Y SOUND • M g)�,cc N3 1 .. Q ? r r 1 'r SAY A fkID IL r rr �1 ^�C i ��•9 l I 11M4\ \ r ` SCALE RECEIVED MAR 10 198d' rl c tit c �Z. 40 . )CC: W/+Vr- FP,err•CTIoN,i3oAritORAb6,9EStnu AA/rQuhiir Works U ,()Pn% Ef) n+-[AK= r/Ir'k tE tlrpP ; ,�I?PAIR VArl)mIALLW-n.n° RECEIVED �I�� 8DILI)INC- ArkrACl-Nr I'!.'R'/'I"PI'l r`,WIV17kt: ' IWKl.INClrN N091 IIFXki CENrRAL ; IN 1•COWNS nAti',1�G��T�DUN' 1'1'1LDIA";• %'IAIIIA ! � 5'80 AtA 10 �►, JAMFb worur•': ll+rlll, %(�iN W , r•1)M(jl+pS,W"{CH. I CITY OF EDMONDS LDUNi1'01' C/1';111i�1�115 (I <,1 qt �',;A; H 11►il�l IIA,Mi I PLANNING DEPT. ,AWLICMION BYLA�CUuiFhtt'►'flrl.i1 lvl�N IQ,tsr, :: r null' wA.t11, Date BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW Instruction: . Check Accuracy of ienal Description . Check Anainst Assessor's Hap for io"al Subdivision . Does it conform to City Anprovpd.Su6divisjnn? Reviewer'sInitials ` Tula 2. -Si te Inspection made on: Storm Sewer Av'ailabilitv: Slit. of f1w(i No Project 5^ Roadside_ ~.^_ 6. Grading & Final 7.Septic Tank System Desi (in Approved: D' Sanitary Spwor Availabilitv Side ucvor avoi D. SanitarySewer Connection Fees? - lO, 11ater |binvt Fire }ly'drxn Check Fire Dept.'s {on�en ll, Sidewalks: (,Site ipsp»ct'on shows conditions of sidowolksps follows)_ 12. lJ, UnUernrooud UiStreet Liqhts: ` 14' StrentRinht-n Slit.-_-- . lS. Existinn Utility 16. Access [asements- ._ ' Site Plan checked for, accuracy? N Special KequiroMents listed in Henm Commercial Apt. Kom/ircnents fonx -74 cl. All }toxn filled in'no Bldg. Permit «pplicntion ' 22. Bonds posted for site work? 23. ki��'nf- ' }n,asino permit reqo1re PERMIT TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEWAGE [DISPOSAL SYSTEM.. Division .of Environmental Health --- Snohornish Health District Courthouse, Everett, Washington — Septic Tank ,gals ��. ; c- - ' _�—_�—=-:---' --_No. Disp. Field _.. _.t�� sq. ft. Trench t �l Other-. "�--��-----=--... _ .---- — = —=-- -.. - — --- - --- Date PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUE By issuing this permit on the above described property, you or any future owners will assume all liabili- ties for the sanitary. function of this system. This permit was issued according to the latest engineering data available on a "temporary sewage disposal system." i DO NOT COVER BEFORE APPROVED BY SANITARIAN OR DESIGNER. 10 I� 1AHE OF PREMISES SERVICE ADDRESS . CITY OF E{ IDS -=- 'PUI,1. IC WORKS DEPAR.T•[IT BACKFL.OI•I DEV I CL_._i EST REPORTSTREET FILE �OCATIOhI OF DEVICE I/ I�-c/ L _A r ��i9� d � 6�i G/'JT'�/g''lc'F DEVICE: r,,�GGa _5 r 7 tlanufacturer tlodel - ze erial No. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST__�_(_o___._ LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CIIi.C1: VALVL CHECK VALVE NO. I 1111TIAL 1. LEAKED O TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT CLEANED LBS CHECK VALUE II0 ? DIFF<<?Ei1TIAL PRESSUI?E RELIEF ;ACNE I. LEAY,ED U 1. OPENED AT _ LBS. CLOSED TI•IIT. P,I.DUCEU PRESSURE 2. 01 D 's0T OPEN 01 CLEANED IREPLACED: DISC ------------- 0 R sriv ING----------- E' E fIJIDE------------ EJ P PIN RETAINER ----- El A H i !*:GE P I I. -------- n i I SEAT ------------- O! R DIAPHRAGM--------.C7' S OTHER, DESCRIBE G REPLACED: DISC -----=------- O SIT IM) --- ------ E] rlUIDE--=--------- L7 PI11 RETAIMLR ----- G HIt1;E .PIN --------- 0 SEAT------------- 17 DIAillIRAGM-------- O OTHER, DESCRIBE , O FINAL TEST CLOSED TIGHT ----- O CLOSED .TIGHT.----- O REMARKS: 7?C=rr W 6 -0- 69 CLEANED REPLACED: DISC.UPPER---------------------- DISC. LC::ER ---------------------- SPI?Ii1G-------- DIAPHRAGM, LARGE UPPER------------------------- L0'-;LR ---------------------=--- DIAPPRAGt,, SMALL UPPER------------------------- L0'.-!r.R ---------------- SPACER, Ln;•!ER OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT Les. REDUCED PRESSURE THE'.ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIF T INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF A0.1 DATE REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE IJ7,2 =- ('U1;1_ lC WORKS DEPAR-TilIT - CITY OF EIDS BACKFL-OW DEV I CL._1 EST REPORT ----STREET FILE jJA11E OF PREMISES SERVICE ADDRESS . LOCATION OF DEVICE —/ DEVICE: _ �D_ _ __1___!� I� nu curer Model Size Serial r0 LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST____ _ LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CIIi_Cl, VALVL _ LBS 111ITIAL 11. TEST 2 R E P A I R S F I I•IAL TEST REMARKS: CHECK VAL;•'E No. 1 LEAKED O 1. CLOSED TIGHT ' ClICCK-VALVE flO. ?_ DIFFERENTIAL ('RESSURE RELIEF VALVE LEAKED EJ 1. OPENED AT �_ LBS. Rl:DUCCI) PRESSUPE CLOSED TIr,IIT. DID NOT OPEN E CLEAVED O CLEANED REPLACED: DISC ------------- L7 SPRING - -i fUIDE------------ CJ PIN RETAINER ----- Cl I4I!*:rE PII----------- n SEAT ------------- O DIAPHRAPI—-------- 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE -- O O REPLACED: DISC ------------- O SITING, --- ------ 13 AU1DJ:--=--------- O Plil RETAIP.LR ----- 0 HI►a,E .PIII.-------- L7 SEAT ------------- O DIAPHRAGM -------- O OTHER, DESCRIBE- -- O CLOSED TIGHT----- 01 CLOSED -TIGHT ------ O THE:ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED, CLEATED E' REPLACED: DISC.UPPrR---------------------- I S C. L(,:•:ER---------------------- SPIMIG-------------------------- C' DIAPHRAGM, LARGE .UPPER ------------------------- LO'•;L('---------------------=--- L." DIAPHRAGM-, SMALL UPPER------------------------- 1) LO:-Iflt---------------- L. SPACFR, L01.4FR OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT LBS. REDUCED PRESSUR INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY � - OF R8i'�� DATE__ REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE 1J7.1 CITY OF ED*ID.S •-- 'PUBI. 1C WORKS DEPART&IT BACKFL•OI•I DEV I CL _11 CST REPORT —__AM°�CET4 FILE. IAt1E OF PRE1.11SES M ERVICE ADDRESS tea► � �. LOCATION OF DEVICE • DEVICE: Ranufacturer LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST // D PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST PILCK VALVL _ CHECK VAL:'E NO. 1 1111ITIAL 11. LEAKED .TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT CLEANED I -lode] Size Seri o. • . LBS. LBS.- CIIECK VALVE 110. ? DIFF[RCi'TIAL 1>RESWRE RELIEF VALVE 1. LEAKED J` 1. OPENED AT _ -- _LBS. R(:DUCED PRESSURE . CLOSED T I.nIIT. i c . DID '•,JT QPEr! C' 0 1 CLEANED IREPLACED: DISC ------------- O SPRIt;G - ' E CIJ I DE ------------ EJ P PIN RETAINER ----- Cl A Hi ;GE Pit! -------- 17 I SEAT ------------- O R DIAPHRAG11--------- 0 S OTHER, DESCRIBE --13 I 0 1 CLEANED REPLACED: Disc ------------- 0 slip IM,, =-- ------ 0 r'UIDL------------.0 Pill RETAINER ----- 0 I4I1-11;E .PIN.-------- O SEAT------------- 1`7 OTHER, DESCRIBE- --0 F i tlAl TEST CLOSED TIGHT----- O CLOSED .TIGHT.----- O REPLACED: DISC.. UPPER ---------------------- f:ISC. LC:;ER ---------------------- S('t? 1 itG-------- DIAPHI<A('M, LARGE UPPER------------------------- LO'411P---------------------- DIAPHRAGM, SMALL UPPER------------------------- --------------- SPAC-r.R, L01-•!FR OTHER, DESCRIBE OPEr:ED AT LBS. REDUCED FRCS —SURE REMARKS: Eo _��� ^-- —_- THE:ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIE DATE J d_ INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF S REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE T- 1 J l: C: C� C CITY OF ONDS -'- 'I'UI;I-lC WORK UEPA �1E 5� JQTR BACKFL•OW DEVICE _i EST REPORT___ -� DEC 22199� NAHE OF PREMISES ,E,0aCAJ -E' 9X%A le1V/ji PUBLIC 1NU • SERVICE ADDRESS �// `�`•' LOCATION OF DEVICE 471 !->�E�,d 1�-•�i'�"� �5/ / f DEVICE: _ I%.a iufacturer I•lodel Si LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CM.CI; VALVL _ LBS. ..CHECK VALVE i10. 1 CHECK VALVE 140. INITIAL 1. LEAKED 0 1. LEAKED TEST 2. CLOSED TIGHT ' �. CLOSED Tir,IIT•. CLEARED LEI REPLACED: DIS------------- ISC I L7 R SPR I I:G----------- L i. E CIJIDE------------ 0 P PIN RETAINER ----- 0 A Hi!';GE PiN-------- ['], I SEAT ----=-------- 0' R DIAPHR,Ar.�►1-------- .0 S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- 0 F MAL TEST CLOSED TIGHT ----- 0 REMARKS CLEANED keleial—r Io. �DI FFEREi'T IAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE EJ 1. OPENED AT LBS. Rmuc. I) PftESSUPE 2. oil) N'OT OPEN rn REPLACED: DISC ------------- O SIT IM,, =-- ------ ul rU1DF.------------- U Pill RETAINLI) ----- G 141NrtE .PIN.-------- L7 SEAT ------------- fJ 01A1111RM11-------- 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE• ­0 CLEATED C� REPLACED: DI SC.LIPPER---------------------- DISC. LI;::ER---------------------- SPRING -=------------------------ I' DIAPHRAGM, LARGEE UPPER ------------------------- I- LO'•iLR---------------------=--- L" DIAPHRAGM, SMALL UPPER -------- - ---------------- [:I SPACER, L014%R OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT Les. CLOSED TIGHT,----- U REDUCLO PRF-5- 1 THE'.ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIE TO B E•. INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATEI/ —:2- z— REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY _ OF DATE all 1 I.7.`I aY�nt-e•.ni'.•q..r ..... p..- p.. :7 ; "e• • �: . t Cr:• •r.-,.••wp ,!!.R-�RR�. 7"!� t .`T7!7.T..•7: 3:;C�'�'.%;! ST ^ CIOF 10 N DS - '!' U I; i. l C 4! O It}: S D E P A FtTI1RET FILE TY 1987 BACKFL-OW DEVICE JEST REPORT ___ DEC�� ---- --- -- PUBLIC WORKS NAME OF PREHISES SERVICE ADDRESS LOCATION OF DEVICE1/,¢v1-77 DEVICE: Manufacturer tit 't•1�odee�l — Size LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST_--- LBS. �r PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CIILCI, VALVL CIIEC1, VALUE No. 1 INITIAL 1. LEAKED O 1. TEST 2. CLOSED TIGHT id, 2. CLEAVED O IREPLACED: DISC ----------- -- 0 R SPRING ----------- 0 E C-IJIDE------------ ri P PIN RETAINER ----- C) A 111:,GE PIII-------- I-) I SEAT ------------- U R OIAPHRAGII------- .O S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- I O ' F I IIAL TEST CLOSED T IGIIT ----- Cl REMARKS: LBS. 2 2 �. erial No. CHECK VALUE 110.^2 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE LEAKED CJ 1. OPENED AT LBS. CLOSED T I.nIIT. P.Imu b PR SUPS 2. D 1 D ?40T OPEN C CLEANED O CLEATED CJ REPLACED: DISC ------------- 0 SITING =-- ------ CJ rUIDF.------------.0 Pill RETAINLI? ----- G 1­11N,F .PIN.-------- U SEAT------------- fJ 1)All IRAMA-------- 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE- -- 0 REPLACED. DI SC.IJPPFR---------------------- L! 1:1SC. LER---------------------- I:.• SPRING -=------------------------ L.' DIIIPIIRAG,1.1, LARGE UPPER ------------------------- 1- LO'411P---------------------=--- L DJAPHRAGf•I, SMALL . LIPPER------------------------- c) 1.0:!I:R--------------- LI SPACER, LOt•!ER OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT LBS. CLOSED TIGHT.----- 17J REOUCEO PkF_5_ jR THE:ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF d���;,� DATE REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE ttkEETFILEAr­ c I TY Of A 11 D-S 'P U B 1. 1 C WORKS 0 E P*A BACKFL-OW DEVICE j[ST REPORT DEC 221987 NAME OF PREMISES c) -4j L&A k& /E SERVICE ADDRESS 7 /'0/,- , LOCATION OF DEVICE Al 4 ietStt�) DEVICE: 77 Z/ RSerial i a 1 No 55' K f a R6 � 6 r Si�;j-/�7 LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CIIi.CI, VALVL LBS. !CIIECI, VALVE NO. I CIICCK-VALV%c 110. 2 DIFFERLT IAL INRCLIEF VALVE pRESrURE INITIAL 1. LEAKED 0 1. LEAKED FJ 1. OPENED AT­�LOS. TEST 2. CLOSED TIGHT 2. CLOSED T I M IT. P[DUC-ED PRESSURE NOT C.-; oil) OPEN CLEANED 0 CLEANED 0 CLEANED L) REPLACED: -REPLACED: REPLACED:' DISC ------------- I-] DISC ------------- 0 DISC. UPPER L • R 5 P R I f I G - - - - - - - - - - - 17i SIT 1 NG � ----------- 0 ----------------------- [fI S C. L E R ---------------------- 1.11: E CIJ I DE ------------ 0 rU I OF ------------- 13 SPR I i1c, -------------------------- P PIN RETAINER ----- C1 'T A I ML 1) ----- Pill RIE G .7 DIAPHRAGI-1, LA RG" A If1!',GE PiN -------- n -Jr * 1­111 F Pill.--1----- 0 U PPER ------------------------- (7 I SEAT ------------- 0 SEAT ------------- 0 L0'--;LR -------------------------- L." R DIAPHRAGII --------- D DIA1111RAM1 -------- 0 OJAPHRAGI.I., SMALL s OTHER, DESCRIBE 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE- --o UPPER ------------------------- c) ----------------- L! SPACE.R, L014c-11 OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT LBS. FINAL I. TEST CLOSED TIGHT ----- 10 CLOSED TIGHT ------ [7j REDUC1C—DT0"kF-5"5'aR'C REMARKS: -. THE'ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF -DATE_ REPAIRED BY OU& DATE r-- FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE 0. 11.78 � STREET FILE • CITY OF E®MONDS 200 DAYTON ST. • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 25, 1983 Meadowdale Marine c/o Mr. Ron Hansen 16111-76th Pl. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Mr. Hansen: SUBJECT: BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE TESTING HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR The backflow prevention devices in your water supply system are due for annual testing as required by State Code WAC 248-54-500. Our records'show a total of three devices in your system. Please have the testing performed by a person holding a certificate of competency as a cross connection specialist, issued by the State Department of Social and Health Services (telephone, 464-7674). If a device fails its test, please have the necessary repairs made. Upon completion of a satisfactory test, have the certified tester fill out the enclosed Test and Main- tenance Report and return it to this office within thirty days. Additional information relative to this matter may be obtained by contacting our Cross Connection Control Specialist at 771-3202, extension 294. ml Enclosures MtTCHELL DT Sincerely, ARCHIE- BRENA Water/Sewer Division Supervisor cWILLEIKSEN DT AR H DT 16 W CITY OF EDMONDS -- PUBL.IC WORKS UIER Th1EWT BACKFLOW DEVICE I'EST.REPORT NAME OF PREMISES M 0w0A 4K SERVICE ADDRESS LOCATION OF DEVICE /�[_��LT _ �/�'7 XAc.X Z. DEVICE: 6 -Z., _�__— 2 . Manufacturer Model Size Serial No. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF.TEST _ LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CliECi, 'VALVE I INITIAL TEST R E P A I R S I ' FINAL TEST REMARKS: .CHECK VALVE NO. 1 1. LEAKED ❑ 1 2. CLOSED TIGHT �I 2 CLEANED ❑ REPLACED: DISC ------------- ❑ SPRING'---.--=--- ❑ GUIDE ------------ El PIN RETAINER ----- ❑ HINGE PIfI----.---- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ DIAPHRAGi1-------- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ CHECK VALVE PJO. 2 LBS. DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE LEAKED ❑ 1. CLOSED TIGHT 2. 1 CLEAi1ED OPENED AT---- LBS. RLDUCE.D PRESSURE DID NOT OPEN ❑ ❑ I CLEATED REPLACED: DISC ------------- ❑ SPRING ----------- ❑ (,UIDF-------- --- ❑ PIN RETAINER, ----- ❑ 111MGE PIN -------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM -------- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE-- ❑ REPLACED: DISC. UPPER -------------- = ------- DISC. LO;-;ER ----=----------------- SPRIiiG -------------------------- DIAPHRAGH, LARGE UPPER------------------------- L01"!LR ------------------------- DIAPHRAGi-I, SHALL UPPER-------------------_------ LOI•!FR--- : LOVER OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT LBS. CLOSED TIGHT -- -- O REDUCED PRESSURE THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO BE_ UE- INITIAL TEST PERFORIMED.BY - OF ���� o.� P� DATE-), REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST -PERFORMED BY OF DATE a Cl C' 1 / 7 `i CITY OF EDMONDS -- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BACY.FLOId DEVICE fE_S.T.REPORT NAME OF PREMISES /i%�,D0 w fW E SERVICE ADDRESS 7,5'zP-4 0--* �,0/* LOCATION OF DEVICE / d Au LT ei DEVICE: rZ� , Manufacturer ModelSizeSerial No. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST__ . LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE LBS. CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE 110. 2 DIFFEREiITIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE INITIAL 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. OPENED AT LBS. TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT 2. CLOSED TIGHT ' _ 2 DID REDUCED PRESSURE NOT OPEN CLEAMED ❑ CLEAi•!ED ❑ CLEATED O REPLACED: REPLACED: REPLACED: DISC =--.---------- D DISC ---------- --- ❑ DISC. LIPPER------------------------ ❑ R SPRI14G----------- ❑ SPRING ----------- ❑ DI SC.LO';iER---------------------- 0 E GU.IDE-=---------- ❑ (',IJIDE------------ ❑ SPRIiIG----=--------------------- O P PIN RETAINER ----- O PIN RETAINER, ----- ❑ DIAPHRAGH, LARGE A HINGE PIN -------- 0 HING.,E PIN -------- ❑ UPPER ------------------------- ❑ I SEAT -=---=------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ L0I;;Ef-------------------------- ❑ R DIAPHRAGH-------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM -------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM, SiIALL S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ UPPER----=-------------------- CI LO',-1ER--------------- G SPACER, LOVER OTHER, DESCRIBE FINAL OPENED AT LBS. TEST CLOSED TIGHT ----- ❑ CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS: THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO JAOF INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY � 7, REPAIRED BY FINAL TEST PERFORi•1ED BY OF Gov DATE DATE DATE 1 / 72 CITY OF EDMONDS -- PUBI_ I C, WORKS DE ARTMENT BACKFLOW DEVICE PEST REPORT NAME OF PREMISES MCI) o <^' p A-4-E SERVICE .ADDRESS �f LOCATION OF DEVICE //vsi'a ��176 /4/7— DEVICE: JATT S ' 0Qoc .- _ Q�5473% Manufacturer Model Size Serial No. LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST v— --` _ 'LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE � _ CBS• CHECK VALVE NO. 1. CHECK VALVE NO. 2 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE INITIAL 1., LEAKED L 1. LEAKED 9 1. OPENED AT -;, LBS. .TEST ' jT REDUCCD PRESSURE 2 CLOSED TIGHTr ` ' CLOSED TIGHT 2. DID NOT OPEN � �� %�G C] CLEARED CLEAINED CLEl1'IED REPLACED: REPLACED: REPLACED: DISC ------------- ❑ DISC ------------- ❑ DISC.I.IPPER---------------------- El R SPRING ----------- ❑ SPRING ----------- ❑ CISC.LOIJER---------------------- E GUIDE ------------ ❑ GUIDE ------------ ❑ SPRI(JG--------------- P PIN RETAINER ----- ❑ -PIN RETAINER----- ❑ DIAPHRAGH, LARGE A HINGE PIf--------- ❑ HINGE PIN -------- ❑ UPPER ------------------------- I SEAT ------------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ M-j'LR-------------------------- 0 R DIAPHRAGM.-------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM =-- - - - -- ❑ DIAPHRAGM, SHALL S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ UPPER------------------------- 0 LO','JER--------------- ❑ SPACER, LO',IER OTHER, DESCRIBE OPENED AT 3. Z LBS. FINAL _ TEST CLOSED TIGHT----- CLOSED TIGHT----- REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS: THE -ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIE TO INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF L� �syJyo"d S DATE. REPAIRED -BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE 1/72 NSTREET FILE i BiL IC l,-.'ORKS DEPARTHEiN, CITY 01: EDNONIDS B A C K F 1) E ',; I C L ;EST REPORT NAME OF PREiMISES SERVICE 'ADDRESS LOCATION' OF DEVICE DEVICE: * .. 1',f�u actor LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST PRESSURL-DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE LBS. . s z e Serial No. LBS. CHECK VALVE INJ. i C H E C K. V i"IL VE 1! 0 D 1 F f- E 1) E L PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. INITIAL I LEAKED -J - 1 L:Et( E D JL - I OPEINIED AT LESS. TEST 2. CLOSED TIGHT I A*' 2. CLOSED TIGHT D U C E i) 1) R E S S U RE 2. D 11) NOT. OPEiN C L E A f 1 E D 0 C L EA 1`! E D 11 C L E A'! E D REPLACED: I,F P L A C E 0 REPLACED: DISC ------------- DJ 1) i s C ------------- 0 Dl, S C. Ll p r R ...................... R .1 ----------- El S In R T J,�r S P R G ----------- 0 DISC. ------------------ E CA! I DE - ------------ D I,u1DE------------ S I., Oj -------------------------- P PlICI R TAII NER ----- L P 1 N RE_T i' I N E R ----- E:I L'IlklGE A H I NG E P 1 i,-------- ❑ HINGE PIN -------- E UCTER------------------------- I SEAT --------- 0 SEAT ------------- E _R - ------------------------- R. DIAPHRr`%Gt! -------- Ll OJAPHRAGM — ------- L-] SI'lALL s OTHER, DESCRIBE 0 OTHER, DESCRIBE UPPER ------------------------- 1 --------------- Ef 0-THE!),, DESCRiBlE FINAL 0f)E,f!'__-D AT LBS. TEST CLOSED TIGHT----- 0 CLOSED TIGHT----- El i REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS, THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO �- T/E: INITIAL. -TEST PERFORIIED BY OF I I �x jz&e V REPAIRE-D BY FINAL TEST PERFORi"IED BY OF ,F DATE L DATE DATE 1 / 72 •'STREET FILE 10-0 CITY OF EDNONDS PUBLIC I,,'ORKS DEPARTHiEtNIT B C K F L 0'.-1' 1) E"; I T L i 1 EST 1), 1 1) 0 R. I NAME OF •PREHISES SERVICE ADDRESS LOCATIq,NL OF DEVICE 14 DEVICE: Ww_ A-7 Ma n u a cl u r e r LINE PRESSURE AT TIME OF TEST /#F d� PRESSURE -DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE Mode I 'Size_ LBS. Is. L L) sei.ial No. Ci cC°g� VALVE N r) I CHECK VALVE i10. 2 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE_ I N'l T I AL 1. L E AKE DU ❑ 1 LEAKED Ll I O!)Ei�";FO AT LBS. TEST !) E_ LF) U C E" 1) PRESSURE 2. CLOSED TIGHT 2. CLOSED TIGHT 2. D i D HOT OPEN C LEANE EDD [:J r C L E AHED D 0 CLEA-CEO REPLACED: REPLACED: RE R LJ`�C E D: DISC ------------- DISC ------------- LJ I D IS C, U P p R ---------------------- R S P NG ----------- F0 SPRING ----------- o' r, S L E R ---------------------- E CiU I DE ------------ 11 L] T t: I — — — — — — — — — — — — ❑r :] Si I — — — — — — — — ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — P Pl.';,' RETAINER ----- Ll PIN RETAINER ----- 0 1 -P I LARGE A llli•;G;E Pli --- -------- ❑ Hli,ME PIN -------- ❑ 11 P p =R ---- ISEAT SEAT ------------- 0 SEAT --- --------- 0 ------------------------- R -------- 0 DIAPHRAGM ----- �­� IJ DIAPH[';',Gt`l, Si'-IALL S OTHER, DESCRID, -1 OTHER, DESCRIB El p P p ------------------------- S P 1­E R L 0'. -1 E R BE FINAL OF`Et;I_17 D AT TEST CLOSED TIGI- iT ------ 0 CLOSED TIGHT----- 01 REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS. THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED INITIAL. -TEST PERFORMED By OF p 47 c PUP -5 DATE % REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFOR;-iED BY OF DATE FIRM NAM WATER DEPARTMENT 1p BACKFLOW P ENTION DEVICE TEST AND MAIIIANCE REPORT STREET FILE FILE NO. W"N'ov-- `T�I; FIACCL T�IuOUDZIADDRESS PHONENo. 74-S - Z21 1 PARTYCONTACTED Q.L I<NU T�GN ONO REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE ❑ DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY MAKE OF DEVICE FEBGO MODEL_ 805 SERIAL NO. 11874 SIZE 3/414 DATE INSTALLED METER NO. LINE PRESSURE 1 �3b PSI PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE Z PSI LOCATION OF DEVICE WEkO'G TDoCoy �Q -Pt-r DIFFERENTIAL TEST CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE NO. 2 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE* BEFORE REPAIRS LEAKED ❑ LEAKED ❑ OPENED AT PSI CLOSED TIGHT CLOSED TIGHT REDUCED PRESSURE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE NEW ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ PARTS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ AND ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REPAIRS ❑ ❑ 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ REMARKS: TEST AFTER CLOSED TIGHT ❑ CLOSED TIGHT ❑ OPENED AT PSI REPAIRS REDUCED PRESSURE * REQUIRED ONLY ON REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE RETURN REPORT TO: SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT QUALITY DIVISION 1509 SOUTH SPOKANE ST. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144 PHONE 625-4307 TESTED BY �TMO7-M) DATE REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST BY DATE TESTER'S WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFICATION NO. C5.23.180 WATER DEPARTMENT BACKFLOW ENTION DEVICE TEST AND MAftANCE REPORT STREETFILE FILE NO. FIRM NAME LA.�SUGTEIJi�+�I�.1Gj W 4 4=yz° ADDRESS lL 111 %4.'TR 71-• WEST "EbAAOUDS ZIP PHONE N0. 74-3 - ZZI 1 PARTY CONTACTED AL K,&U �7FMoty REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY ❑ MAKE OF DEVICE WATTS MODEL GOO SERIAL NO. 454`1 Bea so SIZE DATE INSTALLED METER NO. LINE PRESSURE 14o PSI PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE • S PSI LOCATION OF DEVICE WE5T EN b o F' W� 4 a2 F S-5TZ\l I ce: To -O0Cr\c DIFFERENTIAL , TEST CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE NO. 2 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE" BEFORE REPAIRS LEAKED ❑ LEAKED ❑ OPENED AT_3_ PSI CLOSED TIGHT CLOSED TIGHT REDUCED PRESSURE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE NEW ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ PARTS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ElAND El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REPAIRS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REMARKS: TEST AFTER CLOSED TIGHT ❑ CLOSED TIGHT ❑ OPENED AT PSI REPAIRS REDUCED PRESSURE " REQUIRED ONLY ON REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE RETURN REPORT TO: SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT QUALITY DIVISION 1509 SOUTH SPOKANE ST. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144 PHONE 625-4307 TESTED BY TMO TLdF.J re -S If DATE Z - ZI - S 0 REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST BY DATE TESTER'S WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFICATION NO. 14-8S C S.23.180 �p • WATER DEPARTMENT 3 Y BACKFLOW MENTION DEVICE TEST AND MAftANCE REPORT REET FILE FILE NO. FIRM NAME 15�BUL�'T�1.i V11 N G W I�IJ1Zr ADDRESS It -Ill 1Lo�µ ?L• \OS6T 5AMbyjpS ZIP SR020 PHONE NO. 743- ZZ I 1 PARTY CONTACTED l-\l-- REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE ❑ DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY i•tc44ucme E SZ7-3 MAKE OF DEVICE GTLINNELL, MODEL 15' 7-SERIAeN84'kj' E9Z22 SIZE DATE INSTALLED METER NO. LINE PRESSURE 140 PSI PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE I I/Z PSI LOCATION OF DEVICE W561D 6ir VJ6&� ►M voi "S 'mr-ho PIR Liu DIFFERENTIAL TEST CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE NO. 2 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE* BEFORE REPAIRS LEAKED ❑ LEAKED ❑ OPENED AT PSI CLOSED TIGHT CLOSED TIGHT REDUCED PRESSURE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE PART CLEAN REPLACE NEW ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ PARTS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ AND ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REPAIRS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ REMARKS: TEST AFTER CLOSED TIGHT ❑ CLOSED TIGHT ❑ OPENED AT PSI REPAIRS REDUCED PRESSURE * REQUIRED ONLY ON REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW DEVICE RETURN REPORT TO: SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT QUALITY DIVISION 1509 SOUTH SPOKANE ST. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144 PHONE 625-4307 n 4 R' hbrofAm c cp�L c o. i u c. . �-$3 6642raa 9me.TlfLAKlL_ '.. Ay s-gArlE TESTED BY o-z,& o DATE Z-1-1-PSO REPAIRED BY FINAL TEST BY DATE DATE TESTER'S WASHINGTON STATE CERTIFICATION NO. IA-S3 CS.23.ISO cc s:`-_ /`l-e3 STREET FILE CITY OF E ONDS -- PUBLIC WORKS DEENT BA,C-K.F.LOW DEVICE ]-EST REPORT NAME OF PREMISESSERVICE ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF DEVICE Iks CkAl DEVICE: . F-q-SD c.. 0.7 ManufacturerModel Size Serial No. LINE PRESSURE.AT TIME OF TEST 1 3 D LBS. PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE LBS. CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE NO. 2 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE _ INITIAL 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. OPENED AT LBS. TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT X 2. CLOSED TIGHT REDUCED PRESSURE 2. DID NOT OPEN 0 CLEANED D CLEANED ❑ CLEATED C7 REPLACED: REPLACED: REPLACED: DISC ------------- ❑ DISC ------------- 0 DISC.UPPER--------------------- O R SPRING ----------- ❑ SPRING ----------- D DISC.LO'.-1ER---------------------- ❑ E eUIDE------------ ❑ (,UIDE------------ ❑ SPRING -------------------------- ❑ P PIN RETAINER ----- ❑ PIN RETAINER----- ❑ DIAPHRAGM, LARGE A HINGE PIN -------- ❑ HINGE PIN -------- ❑ UPPER =------------------------ D I SEAT ------------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ LOWER -------------------------- ❑ R DIAPHRAGM -------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM -=------ ❑ DIAPHRAGM, SI.IALL S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- Cl OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑. UPPER, ------------------------- ❑ LOWER --------------- ❑ SPACER, LO'.IER OTHER, DESCRIBE FINAL OPENED AT LBS. -TEST CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS: THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE: INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY ,���� Gt ?O/ OF LEA DATE—Z Zg REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE 0 STREET FILE CITY OF DMONDS -- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BACKFLOW DEVICE ZEST REPORT . NAME OF PREMISESSERVICE ADDRESS ADDRESS LL LOCATION OF DEVICE DEVICE: Manufacturer Model LINE PRESSU E'AT TIME OF TEST i2t;� PRESSURE DROP ACROSS FIRST CHECK VALVE t LBS. Size Serial No. LBS. t CHECK VALVE NO. 1 CHECK VALVE NO. 2 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE INITIAL 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. LEAKED ❑ 1. OPENED AT LBS. TEST 2 CLOSED TIGHT 2. CLOSED TIGHT REDUCED PRESSURE 2. DID NOT OPEN ❑ CLEANED ❑ CLEANED ❑ CLEANED ❑ REPLACED: REPLACED:. REPLACED: DISC -.------------ ❑ DISC ------------- ❑ DISC.UPPFR---------------------- ❑ R SPRING ----------- ❑ SPRING ----------- ❑ DISC.LO'.,JER---------------------- ❑ E GUIDE ------------ ❑ GUIDE ------------ ❑ SPRING -------------------------- ❑ P PIN RETAINER ----- ❑ PIN RETAINER----- ❑ DIAPHRAGM, LARGE A HINGE PIN -------- ❑ HINGE PIN --------- ❑ UPPER ------------------------- E1 I SEAT ------------- ❑ SEAT ------------- ❑ LOWER ------------------------- ❑ R DIAPHRAGM1-------- ❑ DIAPHRAGM -=------ ❑ DIAPHRAGM, SMALL S OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE -- ❑ UPPER------------------------- ❑ LONER--------------- ❑ SPACER, LOWER OTHER, DESCRIBE FINAL OPENED AT LBS. -TEST CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ CLOSED TIGHT----- ❑ REDUCED PRESSURE REMARKS THE ABOVE REPORT IS CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE: INITIAL TEST PERFORMED BY ,G' GG3/7 OF DATE--2-7$ REPAIRED BY DATE FINAL TEST PERFORMED BY OF DATE R I(oilI IL US Army CorpsJoint of Engineers Seattle District 10.� Application for a Department of the Army K A S x Permit and Department of Ecology Certification OEf AA"iEr !F ECOLOGY US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Department of Ecology Regulatory Branch SEA Program Public Notice Date: May 9, 2006 Post Office Box 3755 3190 - 160" Ave. SE Expiration Date: June 8, 2006 Seattle, Washington 98124-3755 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 Reference No.: 200501045 Telephone (206) 764-6911 Telephone (425) 649-7181 Name: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Attn: Jack Kennedy, Project Manager Attn: Rebekah Padgett, Permit Manager Railway Co and Sound Transit Interested parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) have received an application to perform work in waters of the United States as described below and shown on the enclosed drawings. The Corps will review the work in accordance with Section 10 of the 1899 Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Ecology will review the work pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA, with applicable provisions of State water pollution control laws, and with Section 307(c) of the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1451). APPLICANT: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company PF.CIEinV 1) 2454 Occidental Avenue South n nn nf Seattle, Washington 98134 MAY 1 J ATTN: Walter Smith Telephone: (206) 625-6335 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AGENT: Sound Transit 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 ATTN: Chris Townsend Telephone: (206) 398-5135 e-mail townsendc@soundtransit.com LOCATION — In Puget Sound and in estuaries that drain into Puget Sound at two points near Edmonds, Washington and two points near Mukilteo, all in Snohomish County, Washington. PROJECT DESCRIPTION — WORK: The overall project involves establishing a continuous set of double railroad tracks along the 30 miles of Puget Sound shoreline between Seattle, Washington and Everett, Washington. At four points, two near Edmonds and two near Mukilteo, Washington, tracks would be established over a roadbed widened into Puget Sound or into intertidal lagoons between the tracks and the adjacent bluffs. New track would be constructed in what is currently subtidal or intertidal Puget Sound, using fill placed behind an eco-block retaining wall. The fill proposed for Puget Sound would feature armoring and a 10- to 30-foot wide toe keyed into substrates to resist scouring from wave action. Culverts on the corridor would be lengthened by as much as 22 feet. In all, 6420 lineal feet of track (in four segments ranging in length from 890 feet to 2400 feet) will be placed on 3.74 acres of jurisdictional fill on Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates: 9 0 restoration of 6 acres of former estuarine marsh at the Qwuloolt Restoration Site near the mouth of the Snohomish River. The marine areas being impacted by this proposal perform functions involving prey availability, refuge from predators, migration corridor, availability and access to spawning habitat, and physiological refuge. The estuarine lagoons perform additional functions involving food chain support and nutrient cycling, habitat, floodwater storage and conveyance, and water quality. Removal of the 1 .5-acre Meadowdale Marina boathouse is designed to improve impacted marine functions by eliminating factors that depress existing functions —shading, migration disruption, predator habitat, obstruction of longshore sediment transport, and PAHs and other contaminates released by the boathouse's creosote -treated piling. Dense nearshore eelgrass beds exist immediately north and south of the boathouse, and its removal may facilitate natural eelgrass colonization at the site. In Marysville, fronting Ebey Slough in the Snohomish River estuary, lies the Qwuloolt restoration project. It is a 300+ acre collection of low-lying properties used for pasture, separated from Ebey Slough by levies since the early 1900s. The project needs to acquire three more properties to avoid having to build cross -levees for water containment. The applicant has committed to purchase the necessary portions of the three needed properties (14.9 acres), and to actively restore 6 acres by removing tide gates and breaching levees. The 6- acre restoration project would be consistent with the long-term plans established for the entire Qwuloolt restoration project. Pages 15 and 16 of the attached drawings contain text explaining the proposed mitigation. The text was excerpted from a document entitled Conceptual Nearshore Marine, Estuarine, and Weiland Mitigation Plan Everett -to -Seattle Commuter Rail Project Third Easement King and Snohomish Counties, Washington (August 2005). The document is available for review at the regulatory offices of the Seattle District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and from the proposal's agent, upon request. PUBLIC HEARING -Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. EVALUATION - CORPS - The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits, which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered, including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Native American Nations or tribal governments; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for the work. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the activity. 1 Location Milepost* Sound or Distance Fill on Riprap Fill on Substrate Drawing Lagoon Below MHHW Below MHHW Pages Edmonds 16.0-16.2 Lagoon 890 ft 0.04 ac 0.37 ac 2, 3, 5 Edmonds 16.5-16.9 Both 1730 0.55 0.42 4-7 0.59 ac 0.79 ac Mukilteo 26.9-27.2 Sound 1400 0.07 0.81 8-10 Mukilteo 27.7-28.1 Sound 2400 0.43 1.05 11-13 0.50 ac 1.86 ac *Milepost 0 is at the King Street Station in downtown Seattle, Washington. Milepost 15 is near the King -Snohomish County line. Milepost 35 is in Everett, Washington. Mileposts 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 appear on the Vicinity Map, page 1 of the attached drawings. The west sides of two ditch -based freshwater wetlands in the southern (Edmonds) half of the project would receive a total of 0.15 acres of fill. PURPOSE: The purpose of the project is to increase the capacity of the existing rail line to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. The corridor is currently used daily by six Amtrak passenger trains, four Sounder commuter trains, 36 scheduled freight trains, and a varying number of unattached locomotive units moving between cities. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION — Copies of this public notice which have been mailed or otherwise physically distributed feature project drawings in black and white. The electronic version features those drawings in color, which we think more accurately communicates the scope of project impacts. To access the electronic version of this public notice, go to the Seattle District's web page at http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/ and scroll down the alphabetical listing of District elements, and click on "Regulatory" and then "Regulatory — Permits" for the Seattle District's Regulatory homepage. Select the prominently displayed "Public Notices" heading and a list of recently -issued public notices will appear, in chronological order of the date of issuance. Select the listing for this Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway project by clicking on the blue file number, 200501045. Also, on March 31, 2006, the Seattle District verified that Nationwide Permit 14 authorized fills in wetlands between the railroad tracks and the upland bluffs at five locations between Seattle and Everett (case number 200601 11). The work involved five utility projects —two new signal towers and their associated buildings and access roads, and three "control points" with associated switching mechanisms, crossover tracks, buildings, and access roadways. In all, 0.41 acres of freshwater wetlands were filled (increments were 0.01 acre at MP 1 1.8, 0.01 acre at MP 13.1, 0.25 acre at MP 14.2, 0.07 acre at MP 18.8 and 0.07 acre at MP 23.8). We used Nationwide Permit 14 to authorize the work after we determined the work had a separate utility from the double tracking described in this public notice, would be conducted regardless of the outcome of the double tracking request, and were at different locations than the proposed double tracking. The wetlands affected by these five projects are swales lying between the railroad tracks and the bluffs near Edmonds and Mukilteo, hosting hydrophytic vegetation. They have an important stormwater conveyance function, which will be replicated on site by the creation of new ditches. The wetlands have a food chain support function, and limited habitat function for insects and amphibians. Other on -site ditch -related mitigation are as follows: repair a clogged culvert at Deer Creek near Edmonds, producing an increased natural flow to a small creek system. 0 • • remove landslide debris which separate two lagoons north of Edmonds, resulting in more complete flushing of the "upper" lagoon; with less ponding, it should induce a more diverse set of vegetation and an ensuing increase in detrital export and food chain support. ENDANGERED SPECIES: The Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires federal agencies to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), (collectively, the Services), pursuant to Section 7 of ESA on all actions that may affect a species listed (or proposed for listing) under the ESA as threatened or endangered or any designated critical habitat. Listed below are the species, listed under ESA that occur in the project area and the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA), the as the lead agency for ESA consultation, has consulted and continues to consult with the NMFS and the USFWS as required under Section 7 of the ESA: • Bull trout, threatened, may affect, not likely to adversely affect • Bull trout critical habitat, designated, may affect, not likely to adversely affect • Puget Sound Chinook salmon, threatened, may affect, likely to adversely affect • Puget Sound Chinook salmon critical habitat, designated, may affect, not likely to adversely affect • Bald eagle, threatened, may affect, not likely to adversely affect • Marbled Murrelet, threatened, may affect, not likely to adversely affect • Southern Resident Killer whale, endangered, may affect, not likely to adversely affect In January of 2003, FTA sent to the Services a Biological Evaluation that covered Chinook salmon, Essential Fish Habitat, bull trout, bald eagle and marbled murrelet. NMFS issued a Biological Opinion on March 10, 2003, and USFWS issued a letter of concurrence on March 19, 2003. Since the early 2003 NMFS Biological Opinion and USFWS concurrence, additional ESA listings have been made by the Services. Consultation has been reinitiated by the FTA, and is ongoing, expected to be completed before mid-2006. The additional listings are below, along with FTA's determination of effect: • Puget Sound Chinook salmon critical habitat, will not adversely affect • Bull trout critical habitat, will not adversely affect • Southern Resident Killer whale, threatened, may affect, not likely to adversely affect ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996, requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The proposed action would impact about 12 acres of EFH for Pacific salmon, Groundfish, -and Coastal Pelagic Species in the project area. The FTA, as the lead agency for a determination regarding EFH, has consulted with the NMFS. The latter determined the project may adversely affect EFH, and has provided appropriate conservation recommendations. CULTURAL RESOURCES: The FTA, as the lead agency for determining compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, will consult with the State Historic Preservation Office as appropriate. This public notice initiates consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR 800.4[a][3]), with any Tribe that has information or concerns with historic properties in the proposed permit area. MITIGATION: To compensate for the effects of placing railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound substrates, the applicant proposes two forms of mitigation: removal of the Meadowdale Marina's 64,000+ square foot dilapidated boathouse from an intertidal location north of Edmonds (see drawings page 14), and 4 • • The proposed discharge will be evaluated for compliance with guidelines promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency under authority of Section 404(b)(1) of the CWA. These guidelines require an alternatives analysis for any proposed discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. EVALUATION —ECOLOGY: Ecology is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, Native American Nations or tribal governments, State, and local agencies and officials; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this activity. Any comments received will be considered by Ecology to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny approval for the work. Ecology will review the project for a Water Quality Certification (WQC), pursuant to the requirement of Section 401 of the CWA, to determine if the project will comply with Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Act, and complies with applicable provisions of State water pollution control laws. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 307 (c) of the Federal Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Act (16 U.S.C. 1451) Ecology will also be reviewing the project to determine if the work is consistent with the Washington State Coastal Zone Management Program. ADDITIONAL EVALUATION - ECOLOGY: Besides the four instances of installing double railroad tracks advertised in this public notice, Ecology is using this same public notice to advertise and solicit WQC/CZM comments on the five instances of utility work described on the bottom of the second page of this notice, under the heading of ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. That work was authorized by the Corps via Nationwide Permit. Because the work occurred in "non -tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters," it requires an individual WQC and CZM Consistency Determination from Ecology. A vicinity map showing the locations of the five utility actions follows the 16 pages of drawings attached to this public notice. COMMENT AND REVIEW PERIOD - Conventional mail or e-mail comments on this public notice will be accepted and made part of the record and will be considered in determining whether it would be in the public interest to authorize this proposal. In order to be accepted, e-mail comments must originate from the author's e-mail account and must include on the subject line of the e-mail message the permit applicant's name and reference number as shown at the end of this notice. Both conventional mail or e-mail comments must include the permit applicant's name and reference number and the commenter's name and address (e-mail or street), and should also list a phone number. All comments whether conventional mail or e-mail must reach the appropriate office no later than the expiration date of this public notice to ensure full consideration. Corps comments: All e-mail comments should be sent to jack.kennedy@nws02.usace.army.mil Conventional mail comments should be sent to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, Attn: Jack Kennedy, Post Office Box 3755, Seattle, Washington, 98124-3755. Ecology Comments: Any person desiring to present views on the project pertaining to: (1) request for water quality certification under Section 401 of the CWA and/or 2) consistency with the Washington State CZM Program, or to provide comments on the bank's processing or operation, may do so by submitting written comments to the following address: Department of Ecology, Attn: Rebekah Padgett, 3190 160" Avenue Southeast, Bellevue, Washington, 98008-5452, or e-mail to rpad461 @ecy.wa.gov To ensure proper consideration of all comments, responders must include the following name and reference number in the text of their comments: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co and Sound Transit, 200501045. Encl: Figures (16) 6f url Bel6nglam •► m{ i \_ Ol pia.. LUL w 9 U S itaflHiBf Snohanish Rirer _ wedand Ogadon site i m�� \�•�``'`I� {i.�.�..% �; Ike Il�y, ��, . .rgaY V Washington Ir > w yo N so "P9+a..MUIolEao7T7 e. ir tom, z � pagarl2.Sa ...•iw _ - { �'�� _ sYw.�6V 4lir•t II. t g Pages4=11i- -r� v • 9 t�i t ^` WadotadaieManna .c I . ' midgabon site > !�Edmonds16.5 Pages 5 - 8 ,( r'/� C _.,, _ , t f Edmonds .,.`�' - 1 \ ~--• ,F`^ _ S' --L.„. Edmonds 16 0 _ti. ..� t . n : f --� �..• Pages 2 d�' 39 I J r•: q... s'[ v: i-.i�r''a f a,r: 1 `3' - �- `�.. i.=•.�-••!="'y r. -v12 'a•z`� ��`. 1 .••-s \ 7r �ir c 0 2 3 mile Approximate scale y - t Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501045 March 1, 2006 Page 1 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company :: I MATCHLINE SEE PAGE 3 III JYa�F.6r i ^�• t S`"SStr �t-!.{4 t�+ 39 S y5.��""' six ;• i� +�.'� fir- ���i riti � �`�'�•i ''''1..r4g�'`L�g- •- Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501045 iblarch 1, 2006 Page 2 of 16 0 50 100 20C SCALE: 1 "=100' SLIDE DEBRIS TO BE REMOVED TO C0�04kg LAGOONS —APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF INTERTIDAL LAGOON _ F(SK PASSABLE UIL1%ERT+ TO BE'.EX;TENDE� ` kiHhw: �MAINLINE TRA6tC ';A�VDONEQ 6t]LYEI�CS k BB REMOVED - ;REEK CULVERT TO -BE DED, (FISH PASSA9F_E) LEGEND: ® FILL IMPACT AREA PUGET SOUND AND INTERTIDAL LAGOONS Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company 41 0 50 100 200 ' SCALE: 1 "=100' NEW MAINLINE TRACK r 'r E" BLOCKED CULVERT MHHW . '. EEU�RINE' FiLL;�MPAET.= 0S�;OTA[ FILL OVERESTUARINE AREA0ACRES TOT�KL F..ILL �]�N,ER RIpRAP BEtO1NOF11At'; - 0.02 ACRE5 TOTAL FILL'OWER,RIPRAPi BELOW( MkI4W 0.21 ACRES TOTAL FILL OVER MATURAL SUESTA&E APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF INTERTIDAL, LAGOON. MATCHLINE SEE PAGE 2 Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum: NILLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501,045 Nlarch 1, 2006 Page 3 of 16 LEGEND: ® FILL IMPACT AREA PUGET SOUND AND INTERTIDAL LAGOONS Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons -Near/At Edmonds and Nlukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company MATCHLINE SEE PAGE 6 0 75 150 300 SCALE: 1 "=150' LEGEND: ® FUIMPACT AREA PLIGET SOL 0 AND IrrtErmDA1 LAGOONS q.SNIF FbTRACK �..c.. �owrnunc rewa.it., - K ,t FILL,IhiIPACT = 0. ? ACR5S�T, TAL FIB AVER ESTUARINE AREA :.: OGRES T' ..'.FILL,OVER RIPRAP BELOW OHW i, Y Q A S 6TA'L,F1LL OVER RIPRAP BELOW MHHW 0. 26 AC S • T��J�_`. FIL' �' R NATURAL SUBSTRATE (CONTI (�E ',t�1� RP RE 17) ES�jUAMNE EIF.1�11i+iPACT =•. .. r 0 �0`ACRESS TOTAL_EICZ (ER ESTUARINE AREA O-06-,l4CRES TQ�f�L ME QV(f`Et RIPRAP BELOW OHW _`• •0 03 AM'9TOTAE PI ` VER RIPRAP BELOW MHHW �0:16 ACRES TQ'F �k�lE F1L,Q, .y,EN�ITURAL SUBSTRATE S 1;0—MMW 'urpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad :racks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- Jor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and :ommuter rail traffic Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) ?00501045 Nlarch 1, 2006 Page 4 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company f EXISTNG MAWILBE TRAOt I OUSTING GROU O / FN SHED SIEGRAOE `OH1k I OHIW. _- -- - . I.`O' SIEBALLASi OHM IWaQ WPACT IMPACT LIME LtE HEN IMIMLE 1 TRAOt t i E19 2IEAN MGtER HIM WATER Ant CRUSHED -----.-- CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE Y YEAN,LOWER LC ELEV 0.0. FILL IMPACT LIME I I IEW CONCRETE GRAVITY BLOCK WALL t LTS I ELEY 0.2 TEIPORARY IMPACT LOE �A1 SECTION - ROCK REVETMENT STA 947+00 TO STA 958+30 (AO-MT2) STA 973+50 TO STA 976+00 (AO-MT2) 'urpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad •acks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- or to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and ommuter rail traffic Tatum: ItitLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 00501045 March 1, 2006 Page 5 of 16 1 INTERTIDAL [LAGOON I BACKFILL WITH TRENCH EXCAVATIM I MATERIAL TO ORIGNAL GRADES Y LV#T LOOSE RPRAP - CLASS 300 lEGEI� LIGHT LOOSE RPRAP ® IADERLAYER ® CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company -PUGET SOUNI } yv t� t s r ; t 0 75 150 300 SCALE: 1 "=150' LEGEND, ® FILL ONPACT AREA PUGET SOUND S.OFTED TRACK MARINE FILL IMPACT = GM ACRES TOTAL FILL OVER ESTUARINE AREA 0.05 ACRES TOTAL FILL OVER RIPRAP BELOW OHW 003 ACRESTOTAL FILL OVER RIPRAP BELOW MHHW 0.18 ACRES TOTAL FILL OVER NATURAL SUBSTRATE (CONTINUED FROM FIGURE 15) MATCHLINE SEE PAGE 4 Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad racks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- ior to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and ;ommuter rail traffic datum: NILLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) ?00501045 ik1a,ch 1, 2006 Page 6 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidai, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons NeariAt Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Appiicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company TEMPORARY FRL IMPACT IMPACT LINE LINE I-f-- PUGET BACKFI L WITH TRENCH EXCAVATION MATERIAL TO ORIGINAL GRADES --% $ MEAN LOWER LOW ELEV -M TEMPORARY IMPACT LINE SOUND J MHHW OHw BAFACT IMPACT LINE LINE EXCJMTpN L WT J SECTION - ROCK REWTMIENr MA 9M25 TO STA 9e24M(A"AM STAW9tT3TOSTA9Q"(A0- T SACKRU. WITH TRENCH EXCAVATION MATERIAL TO ORIGINAL GRADES FILL IMPACT LINE F Q NEW MAINLINE SHIFTED MAINLINE TRACK TRACK2 ARM FU14G ROCK W TON SHALL NOT BE PLACED BEYOND THIS LINE LEGEND UNDERLAYER _ CRUSHED SUIWACING BASE COURSE ® ARMORM ROCK MNHW OHw IMPACT IMPACT i LINE I WEIN MAINLINE SHIFTED MAN&IE TRACK T TRACK 2 FF -�GEOGRIO SEE NOTE 4 NEW GRAVITY BLOCK WALL FOR WALL ELEVATICNS SEE DWG M21 • CRIANED SURFACING BASE COURSE LIMIT �EXISr NG GROUND �_ ­ r GENERAL NOTES: • T. BEACH TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SIDE CAST ON BEACH AND RE4ZED FOR RESTORATION OF BEACH TO ORIGINAL GRADES. ROCK DBO= EXCAVATION MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND DEED OFF-SrM 2 EXISTING ROCK DIM: MATERIAL MAY BE PRESENT IN BEACH TRENCH EXCAVATION. 1 CONTRACTOR SKULL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MMNOUNING ADEOLWE C SECTION -ROCK REVETMENT STABBm OF EXISTING EMBANKMENT DURING E)CAVATICNL A 9W4W A 9NN (AU-ARZ 4. EXTEND GEOGRID TO EXCAVATION UMLf. Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum: IVILLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501045 March 1, 2006 Page 7 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company • MATCHUNE SEE FIGURE 26 • y r>i- S-"#�xY JL `Y • � r e 0.94ACRES TOTAL FI L OVER NHF1WlEMEII �..,' O:13ACRESTQTAEFI L"OVERRlPWBELOW,OFiW Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200601046 iiMarch 1; 2006 Page 8 of 18 0 73 1 j0 30;1 L SCALE: 1 "=1 SO' LEGEND: FILL IMPACT AREA I i•.'/ 1 j PUGETSOUND WETLANDS I i (iSHIFTED TRACK Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Raihnray. . E' 11 I MATCI-ILINE SEE FIGURE 25 Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. Datum: NILLVV = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 20050.1045 �\,Iar-h 1, 20063 Page J of 1-3 300 SCALE: 1"=150' LEGEND: FlLLNPACT AREA PUGET SOUND AND INTIDAL LAGCONS rtSHIFTED TRACK Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore,'§ubtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Ntukilteo (2 locations each Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail'riav TEMPORARY Fu IMPACT TRACT LINE LAE I I I I 1rU0ET SOUND 1 RESTORE BEACH TO ORKWAL I I ARMORING, ROCK GRACES USING TRENCH I EXCAVATION MATERIAL _M 1am I\ I USN/ OHM IMPACT IMPACT LDE LAE 11 Its t t PROPOSED EIOSTNG TRACK I NASD TRACK I 2 TRACK 2 TRACK� EWTW GROUND I II I I I r O SE TION - RO K R V TMENT STA 1534.00 TO STA 1541-60 TEMPORARY FLL IMPACT VAT LINE LW I ( 1 1 I RESTORE BEACH TO ORIGSNLL GRACES USSR TRENCH EXCAVATOI MATERIAL I PUC6T SOUND I TOE NHII/ Ow IMPACT VACT L/E LINE I I PROPOSED MAINL I I I I TRACK 1 IE 1 I I TOP OF WALL, ELEV -MO `—, I I HNG ROCK ELEV -LK —� SECTION - ROCK REVETMENT STA 1541-60 TO STA 1549.00 t t EXISTNG, PROPOSED WAA/�VE TRACK 2 E16TK6 GROUND SWACNG BASE COURSE GRAWY BLOCK /ALL Of All GENERAL NDTES# L BEACH TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE SCE CAST ON BEACH AND RE-MbEO FOR RESTORATION OF BEACH TO ORICK4L GRADES, ROCK ORE EXCAVATION MATERUL SHALL BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OFF-SITL 2. EXISTNG ROCK DRE MATERAL MAY BE PRESENT N BEACH TRENCH EXCAVATION S. EXTEND GEOGRD TO EXCAVATIOH LAST. Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum::.klLLbN/ = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 2)050'04.55 Marcy 1, 2006 'page 10 :)r 13 L[VO ED GiQRIT� = mom swam am MW ® AN=W MM Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Sr-0 o,c ;is;I county, Washington SUfiington Northern, Santa r'Fe Rajh,va`! �ompan,, 0 75 50 .30i _ _- __A/lATCHUNE SEE PAGE 12 SCALE: 1 "=150' Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks bebveen Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. Datum: M, LL Y/ = 0.0 (M.O.S.) 20050'1045 `,larch -1, 2006 Para 11 0i 16 (i SHIFTED TRACK Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Mear/At Edmonds and iblul<ilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Y/ashington 1pplicant: Burlington Mcrthem Santa Fe Raiiway • v 75 130 ivy SCALE: I "=1 0-0' i �cvervu: I, FILL IMPACT AREA PUGET SOUND AND ....: INTIDAL LAGOONS MATCHLINE SEE PAGE 11 Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks bebveen Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501 L)45 ;klar,h 1. 2006 Page 12 of 10 Ii SHIFTED TRACK Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and rvlukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington r=,pplicant: Burlington Morthern Santa =e Raihl/ay AROHN am OVACT aaACT UHL ILOH TTOVAC ❑�T AC I z N09LOa O'OOP06FD YADIDQ �T 1 TRACK I �T� , TRACR I iii$70Hi 0[ACN TO � GAAOES 16R16 1@LIIOI TACAYAT1011 "ATEaAI 1 PYONT SOUND ��� I 1 � I --- s " F SECTION — ROCK REVETMENT STA 1580+60 TO STA 1594+00 Q AR�a.rH. ® ANN" AHr mom am VACT OAIACT T ACT I I IPAC? L I I PROPOSED "AONRE EMTO4 1 1 1 TRACK I PROPIDSED «"A2 EOSTOAO Goo"I TRACK 1 I I r---_—I RESTC0E BEACH TO OMMMl I ORAM DSORI Sow" I ARHOORM ROCK EXCAVATION allTERAL I I ko � �- CE/Ellll It11E➢ �� r. � 1� L KAM TRENCH V=VATIOH SWU BE S:[ CAST ON BEACH AND RE -USED FOR RESTORATIM OF RNADI TO ONEINL GUMS. ROCK ONE EXC►VAT= _ MATERIAL SHALL ME RE110M AND ORPOSED OEE-SITE. bum . _. . ELEY . .._,. _,..-_---- .__ ._.-_._.. ,,.. L ESTXIO ROC[ 00E "ATEH"L "AT BE PRLSOHT OH BEACN TRENCH !0' TEO UM 01 HTDI LE[CEOGHO TO EYCAWTXXH IiXT. G SECTION — ROCK REVETMENT STA 1574+60 TO STA 1580+20, STA 1594+00 TO STA 1597+40 'urpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad racks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- ior to accommodate increasing freight, passenger: and :ommuter rail traffic Datum,: INILLY1 = 0.0 (ti.O.S.) ?- 1350:^'5 Ndarc., 1, 2006 Page 13 JF 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/at Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, INashington Applicant: Burlington I:lorthern San,a �Fa RaiNkiay Company Aerial photo showing the Meadowdale Marina's 60,000+ square foot overwater boathouse facility about 3 miles north of the Edmonds ferry terminal. The whole structure would be -removed in its entirety as part of the mitigation package for this project. From Washington Department of Ecology's "Shoreline Aerial Photo- graphs" web site at http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/shorephotos/ Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic. Datum: N1LLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200050104-5 ;!arch 1, 2006 ?age 14 of 10 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles). Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and klukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish CouWy, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Sang =e t?aiiav9y 0 Goals and Obeectives of compensatory Mitigation at Qwuloolt Restoration Project Site6420 The goals of compensatory mitigation in the Snohomish River estuary are to facilitate the restoration of estuarine processes to over 300 acres and to restore natural hydrologic connection to two stream systems. To achieve these goals, the Trustees developed the following objectives: l . Removal or breaching of dikes to restore estuarine intertidal processes 2. Removal of tide gates on Allen Creek and Jones Creek (Hillman 2004 personal communication). i Sound Transit's mitigation for marine impacts will satisfy the ratios established in the record of decision (ROD) issued by FTA in February 2000. - Rationale for Selection of Mitigation Site Only 17 percent of the area surrounding the lower Snohomish River estuary is undeveloped and available as natural habitat. It is estimated that habitat changes have reduced Chinook production capacity to between 40 and 60 percent of its historic level. The Qwuloolt restoration site is located in one of the focus areas for near term actions and addresses all the actions suggested in the Snohomish River Basin Interim Habitat Protection Restoration Strategy for this focus area (SRFB 2004). Restoring, estuarine intertidal processes will provide significant improvements in Chinook salmon abundance, productivity, and diversity (Hillman 2004 personal communication). Restoration of the property currently held by the Trustees would require that the adjacent low- lving portions of the Rose, Hendrickson, and Roberts properties be protected from tidal influences and flooding should the Ebey Slough dike be breached. This protection would likely take the form of new diking systems that are relatively expensive. Purchase of these properties will allow the Trustees to create a larger, contiguous property with a boundary above the floodplain, reducing or eliminating the need for diking (Emcon 1998), and resulting in a larger contiguous restoration site. Targeted Functions The nearshore marine functions important to salmonids that will be affected by the proposed project include prey availability, refuge from predators, and migrations corridors (see Table 4). Identified restoration opportunities in the Snohomish River estuary will provide these functions in addition to much needed overwintering and freshwater transitional habitat for juvenile salmon. The primary benefits to salmonids from tidal restoration are: Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum.- MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501045 March 1, 2006 Page 15 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company • An increase in habitat capacity, which is expected to increase salmon production • Reestablished migration corridors • Restored edge habitat to tidal habitat ■ Reestablished marsh and blind channel habitat ■ Increased feeding opportunities • Reduced predation potential on juveniles ■ Improved flood storage ■ Reduced water temperatures and increased dissolved oxygen content ■ Improved pollutant removal through sediment retention. All of these benefits act to decrease juvenile salmon mortality and increase critical habitat. Restoration of the Qwuloolt site is expected to result in increased habitat capacity and smolt production in an area that currently has a small percentage of total acreage in salmonid habitat (Anchor 2003c). Existing Site Conditions Existing soils, vegetation, sources of water and landscape position at the Qwuloolt restoration site lend themselves to a project that will accomplish the goals of restoration in the Snohomish River estuary. The site includes over 300 acres of farmland located 0.5 miles southeast of downtown Marysville, Washington. The property is bordered on the north by other pasture lands, on the east by rural residential development and farm buildings, on the south by Ebey Slough, and on the west by Allen Creek and undeveloped land. Jones Creek, a tributary to Allen Creek, runs through the center of the property. - Purpose: Establish a continuous set of double railroad tracks between Seattle and Everett to enable the corri- dor to accommodate increasing freight, passenger, and commuter rail traffic Datum: MLLW = 0.0 (N.O.S.) 200501045 March 1, 2006 Page 16 of 16 Proposed: Place railroad bed fill on 3.74 acres of Puget Sound nearshore, subtidal, and estuarine substrates in four segments totaling 6,420 lineal feet (1.2 miles) In: Puget Sound and adjacent lagoons Near/At Edmonds and Mukilteo (2 locations each) Snohomish County, Washington Applicant: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS CENWS-OD-RG (C) P.O. BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WA 98124-3755 OFFICIAL BUSINESS ETURN SERVICE REQUESTED EDMONDS, CITY OF 250 5TH AVENUE N EDMONDS, WA 98020 o P� ros;, F z � PITNEY BOWES 02 1 A $ 00.630 00046231 60 MAY 09 2006 MAI LED FROM ZIP CODE 98124 'DATE RECEIVED:: Y a PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS USE PERMIT ZONE L� NUMBER AD sunE/APTr . ADDRESS IhI CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS _ PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE g 6 O MAILING ADDRESS ' {.. �- i� S ' 6 1 I l PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION FT pence RTESCIP a0°`�°,y„ had Street Use Permit flame � �B�Oe 17 Sidewalk Rewired O �oU"�reqLdred O1°11 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE —�YI�j NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES E3 NO 1 0 _ S �u C ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE CS 49 W CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME CBL q / " 6�� D / �� / ✓ / ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE ADDRESS v C FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE CITY ZIP TELEPHONE O O VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADS# INREO D10N BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY 13YE3. ONO g BEPA REVIEW COMPLETE I EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED I PROPOSED O PROPgffff TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. D ❑ NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING/MECH ❑ ADDITION COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR ❑ CHANGE OF USE ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT L/R SIDE REAR PARKING REO'D I PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS . ❑ FENCE X FT) REMARKS ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK _ PRINKLER ❑ GARAGE RETAINING CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY WALL ❑ FIRE FIRE SALARM u (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITIO EXPLAIN: ' /JJ CHECKED BY . E OF CO STRUCTI N Ace CO t77 OCCUPANT GROUP oNUMBER m O OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING NITS �f U / v CRITICAL AREAS NUMBER %�� . / r SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED E OYES AREA OCCUPANT LOAD DESCRIBE WORK to BE DONE 9 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC I08(FINAL INSPECTION RECVD 5 m D G 4 - VALUATION Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % 4 Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing Mechanical THIS PERYR AUTHORMS ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading 7 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE g SEPARATE PERMISSION � Engr. Review W PERMIT APPLICATION: ISO DAYS d PERMIT LIMIM 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION -APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF aEDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE �+ 9 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt Due = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'8.ABIUTY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION - / Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application Is not a permit wail signed by the Official AND IN DOING THEfRK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building 0al or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE RCODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt isecknamedgedinspaceprwded. WORKMEN S OM INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OF SIGNA E DATE BIG WNER AGENT) DATE SIGNED (425) V/ J 771-W20 RELEASED S A AlffffNVIOA EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW -INSPECTOR CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 COPIES GREEN -ACCOUNTING 1p c 189v STREW FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 1215TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-M • FAX (425) 771-0221 WebAe: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering January 31, 2003 Meadowdale Marina LLC Jim Johnson, Registered Agent 7411 196`h Street Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 RE: Meadowdale Marina @ 16111 76`h Place West, Edmonds Dear Mr. Johnson: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to outline City requirements regarding the repair work to be performed on the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, City Fire Department crews responded to a fire sprinkler flow alarm on January 25 h, 2003 and discovered a portion of the pier and heavy framed timber building on the pier, partially collapsed. City Fire and Building Officials met with the Marina General Manager Mr. Milosavljevic on January 28a, 2003 to view the damage and discuss the repair issues. Mr. Milosavljevic indicated that he had the authority to speak and make decisions on behalf of the LLC. If this is not true please inform my office immediately. Given this the following is required by the City: • Contact PUD and immediately repair the stressed electrical line that services the heavy timber building. • Take immediate action to protect the electrical service panels that are now exposed to the weather due to the partial building collapse. A State Electrical permit may be required to repair etc.; it is your responsibility to contact the State Labor & Industries Everett offices for permitting requirements. • Remove the abandoned fuel tank located on the westerly portion of the pier. A tank removal permit ($45) is required. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. The City Fire Inspector must be on site to observe the cleaning and removal of the tank while in process. Remove the septic tank located on the east side of the pier and cap plumbing lines to and from the tank. A compliance permit ($50) is required for this work. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Obtain a repair permit to make all necessary repairs. to the fire sprinkler system, (fee based on contractor's repair bid for the work). Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. Incorporated August 11, 1890 SiStpr City - Hokinnn ,Tnnan Mr. Johnson January 31, 2003 Page Two • Secure the pier from access via land and water within 30 days date of this letter. Removal of ladders that allow water access to the pier and installation of "No Trespassing" signs are required. If in the future you decide to repair the damaged columns, piers, decking, or building, etc. you shall be required to obtain a building permit for this work. It is also highly likely that some Planning permits such as Shoreline permit, critical areas review, etc. would also be required. We suggest that you schedule for a pre -application meeting with City officials for any future. repairs, remodeling. or re -building for this site. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220 during normal City business hours. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance for a mutually agreeable day and time as I am frequently assisting other citizens and not always available. Sincerely, aw�* Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Mr. Milosavljevic, 23423 Brier Road, Brier, WA 98036 tf t 5 \i� � "'fit, t+; � �� Yi\ � tt-•'Ni�uJ�t .`��t '1sL. .- J"-:.tl+_�. J�r: It _�' l i' �' ^l: 1t r ( �``. t d` - r if"�YpF 'i�.lf••')I 4 �!9.. aw ! ti f.11 Y! Y ia�l+. fi tom• �:�G#$ }�t�r� F r¢� �M,t;y .� ;�S��kF� tx. d�`)..,• � .7f P .ri» p :d��"T�ira�--f X1r���t �, tc3 :��.•u �,�� r'4 `""°�:��p 4.'y�' ��'�}_ W.��. f 1 � ;( •' _ r, r a #� c Ie�F,1y r 7 ar`'P�� 9 R iH, Fy I ' yi _Q S+}( •� ;7 ,R t+ YY. (%ri�y t.��'�'J '1ST tit , 1' �"��i _'*�j'3 �t,.y � 'C � LS:'t _. iZ-_.....,.,y, -w .. i.:i��..�.�:X�R''i:-r_V� . ... '?, 9wii�1�S'• 4� .. �r'y •�a.! 1I i•: +fit ;Y &' Y. 1!z • J CLAIri FOR DAMAGES STREET F11E Claim must be filed with the City Clerk. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS: RECEIVED MAR. 31 1988 Edmnnrk (;itv C/Prk PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, THAT PHASE I, LTD., a Washington limited partnership, d/b/a Meadowdale Marine q WHO NOW RESIDES AT 16111 76th Place West, Edmonds, WA T State present actua I address by -street, number and cityT_ AND WHO FOR SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO DATE OF ACCIDENT HAS RESIDED AT same Give residence by street, number and city CLAIMS DAMAGES -OF AND FROM THE CITY OF EOMONOS INI THE SUM OF ; 56,328.00 arising out of the following circumstances: Describe Claim, giving 1) Failure of City of Edmonds to stub in DATE and TIME injury or. sewer 'line (North Meadowdale LID #210) damage occurred, PLACE to the property line of claimant and and full particulars. Accurately locate and 2) Pumping charges incurred by dlaiman - describe defects causing injury or damage and all acts of negligence claimed. Accurately describe Claimant asserts city has duty to stub in the injuries or damage sewer line to the claimant's property line - Project cost of Claimtone is s -'ma _ _d at $54,000.00. As a result of the city's failure to stub in the sewer line claimant has incurred pumping expenses of $2,328.00 State items of damage 1) Cost of stub in project - $54,000.00 claimed. Itemize all expenses and losses. 2) Cost of pumping holding tank on claimant's property - $2,328.00 (Claim must be sworn to by claimant) PHASE 1, LTD. S ana tore or C i a iman t) General Partner SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 3/ !I- day of March ,19 88 - Notary Pub iic in. and for t sate of Wa; My appointment e:<pires: -7 k Y STREET FILE MEMORANDUM April 7, 1987 TO: Ilene Larson, Utility Billing / FROM: Jerry Hauth, Engineering Division d SUBJECT: UTILITY BILLING FOR MEADOWDALE MARINE As we discussed this morning, I would like you to hold off on increasing the utility billing to Meadowdale Marine. It is inappropriate to penalize the marina for not connecting to the sanitary sewer at.the present. When the obstacles preventing connection to the sewer have been resolved, I will notify you. At that time, you may impose the penalty against Meadowdale Marine. JH/sdt k�- CD222 AlbertMtLrch LARSEN/TXTST530 TO: FROM: RE: LEL, STREET FILE CITY ®F E M NDS CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775-2525 CITY ATTORNEY November 8, 1985 Jerry Hauth City of Edmonds Scott Snyder Office of the City Attorney Meadowdale Marine/Phase I, Ltd. Sewer Connection LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR RECEIVED NOV 111985 ENGINEERING I discussed the sewer connection for Phase I with Dean Shepherd. Generally, because of the confused nature of the ownership of the railroad right-of-way, the legal issues may be much more complex than the practical solution. I suggested to Dean that he go to his client and recommend, as I am recommending to you, that we find some to divide the costs equitably between the Marina and the City. I posed our question for him as to why the City should bear full cost of this line when they are maintaining lines for other utilities in the same area. As a practical solution I propose that the City pay for the initial costs of construction while Phase I, Ltd. picks up the costs of current and future licenses and any repairs to the line itself.. In this way we can limit our costs to initial contruction and allow Phase I, Ltd. to maintain both the easement and the line itself, as they maintain their other facilities. I would appreciate it if you would provide me with a written estimate of the construction costs necessary to extend our line to the Phase I edge,of the Burlington Northern easement. WSS/naa CITY of E®OVA®N®S Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 November 8 • Dean -Shepherd Shepherd and'Shepherd 112 Third Avenue South P.O.Box 416 Edmonds, Washington 98020 REa Phase ,I,'.:Ltd./Meadowdale Marine Dear: -Dean i -. . I am writing to confirm our phone conversation of November 5, 1985, regarding the extension of a sewer stub across Burlington Northern property to the boundary line of Phase One, Ltd. (Meadowdale Marine). It was my proposal., subject to Council ;: review' �and:,authorization, that the City bear the cost of actual construction::of : a sanitary sewer line across . the Burlington.. Nor therw-leas ement; .and "upon completion of the ;line, deed"that, ' line `to.4hase ; I•; : Ltd:. in exchange for their promise to ,pay.'all` costs associated with obtaining the license necessary to cross Burlington Northern property, to maintain that license in the future, and to maintain, repair and/or reconstruct the line should such be necessary in the future. In effect, it is my proposal that the City put in the line, executing any documents jointly.with Phase I, Ltd* necessary to bring about the construction:.of the line in exchange for Phase I, Ltd.'s t:,'';:+agteemerit?-tio:pay the costs of obtaining the license for the line °',and taking•65ver any future obligations associated with it: Please review this with your client. I have asked Jerry Hauth to prepare construction estimates. I would be glad to share these estimates with you when prepared. If your client agrees in principal to this agreement:, please advise so that I can prepare a draft agreement for your review. When we have hammered out the details of the settlement, we would put it on the Council agenda for review of the settlement as well as of the costs necessary to i construct the line. I' 4 Very truly. yours, .F FJ � 'r -} +`' _.}% r 'F- - - a. -' ••'•.''•'l. 'f r' �It•.:S^;.• OFFICE OF THH CITY AT'PORNSY, t W. Scott Snyder 1 WSS/naa ccc .Jerry Hauth, City of Edmonds FILE* STREET * MEMO TO: SCOTT SNYDER OCT. 23, 1985 FROM: JERRY HAUTH SUBJECT: MEADOWDALE MARINE SIDE SEWER CONNECTION As we discussed, I have researched Phase I Ltd. access to the sanitary sewer. The Tax Assessor's rolls show that Phase I Ltd. owns lots 7 - 11 of Meadowdale Tidelands. I have enclosed a copy of the tax rolls and the Plat of Meadowdale Tidelands. On the Plat of Meadowdale Tidelands you will notice that the easterly boundary of the lots adjoins the right of way for Meadowdale Avenue, which in turn adjoins the right of way, for Great Northern Railroad. In my opinion, this reduces the possibility of Phase I Ltd. having an underlying ownership of the B.N.R.R. right of way. Currently, Meadowdale Marine has water and gas running through conduits that are in a 24"-30" steel casing that extends under the railroad tracks. This was authorized by B.N.R.R. Permit Number 240,059. On Oct. 17, 1985 I spoke with Mr. David George of the B.N.R.R. permit section. Mr. George told me that B.N.R.R. could not issue the City a permit to put side sewer in the aforementioned steel casing without getting permission from Phase I Ltd. . He felt, with the consent of Phase I Ltd., the existing permit could have a,supplement attached to it that would include the side sewer. It will cost $300.00 to revise the existing permit or issue new permit. I have tried to contact the B.N.R.R. Roadmaster for the area (Mike Forgey) to discuss the problem on the site. Mike left a phone message that stated a new permit would be required for any new pipes within the existing casing. I have not been able to meet with Mike on the site as of yet. It appears that phase I Ltd. can get access to the sewer stub that was installed for them, if they want to. At this time, I do not know who has the responsibility to extend the pipe under the B.N.R.R. . / If you want us to get a title report, or provide you with any additional information, contact me at your convenience. r. AS3308RI S N 0 H 0 M I S H C 0 U A S S E S.S 0 R R E A L P R O P E R T Y R O L OWNERSHIP NAME STMT LEGAL DESCRIPTION AUCIT PTY 5139-001-002-0009 8-16-19 MEAOC'ADALE TIDELANDS SUYDAM GARY W/CHILDS WILLIA.M BLK 001 0-00 - ALL LTS 2-3-4-5-6 ELK A P 0 BOX 22444 SEATTLE WA 98122 5139-001-007-00.04 8-31-81 MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS PHASE 1 LTD BLK G01 D-OC - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A 20146 25TH N W SEATTLE WA 98177 5139-001-012-0007 170481-71 MEAUCWOALE TIDELANDS HAINES H F E J B BLK 001 D-00 - LCT 12 BLK A 'o 16430 72ND W EDMONDS, WA S3C2C 5139-001-013-0006 132049-81 MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS L' SANDERL IN JCHN D C JANET BLK 001 D-00 - LOTS 13 C/O SCOTT WILL IA,M D do 4069 MYLIUS ROAD ;3:1 WENATCHEE WA 98801 _ �: 40:5139-001-015-0004 132048-21 MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS '31! SANDERL IN JOHN D S JANET E BLK_ 001- 0_OC - LOT l5 BLK A u•~ C/O SCOTT WILL &AM D —4 I35, 4069 MY L I U S ROAD _ �6 WENATCHEE WA 98EC1 37 23 5139-001-016-0003 13205C-81 MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS 30 SANDERLIN JOHN D E JANET E BLK 001 D-CC - LOT 16 BLK A s � C/O SCOTT WILL IAM D _ v 4069 MYL.IUS ROAD j•:) WENATCHEE WA 98EC1 _ Ab 5139-001-017-0.101 107655-69 ;SI SCHAEFFER P A MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-01 - LOTS 4320 BURKE AVE IN SEATTLE wA 98103 5139-001-019-0109 12-5-74 MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS PARKS GARY L BLK 001 O'C1 - 415 S LAKE STEVENS RD N 30FT CF S 40FT OF LCT19 BLK _A LAKE STEVENS WQ 98256 _5139-OOL-019-0208 31023-83 MEADC40ALE TIDELANCS _ PATER5ON JAuE5 BLK C01 0-02 - N 20FT LT 19 BLK A BOX 2071 i tju In !I STREET OCT 1 G 1981 FILE: . { Dir. Ot I M 21 13 14 15 16 .171 18' 19 20 21 22 231 24 25 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE. WESTERN DISTRICTLt),F:.'WA"SHINGTO1V ^; AT SEATTLE 3 IN RE: 4 LAE$UGTEN FISHING WHARF, INC., a Washington corporation, 5 Debtor.. 6 7 8 9 10 JAY CAREY, Trustee for Laebugten ) Fishing Wharf, Inc., a Washington ) Corporation, ) Plaintiff, ) VS. 11 PHASE I, LTD., a limited 1, partnership, et.al.,- Defendants. i Case No. 80-01.814 Adversary No. .81-0391 NOTICE OF HEARING ON TRUSTEE'S DISTRIBUTION OF'PROCEEDS OF SALE To`_�the Debtor, its creditors and other parties in my jst: Jay Carey, duly qualified and acting Trustee herein, by and through his attorney, Roderick N. McAulay, has applied to the court for an order allowing and denying claims as indicated below. By prior order of this court the Trustee was authorized to sell the real property of the Debtor free and clear of liens and encumbrances except those of Queen City Savings & Loan. The approved sales price was $50,000 and that amount has been paid over and is now retained by the Trustee. The Trustee is now in the process of determining the validity and amounts of claims against these proceeds. To this end he previously filed a motion for partia summary judgment and pursuant to that motion'an order was entered allowing and denying various claims. Three claims however could not be disposed of in a summary judgment proceeding and the Trustee has requested a hearing to resolve the remaining unsettled claims. Following is a list of all lien claims against the proceed from the sale of.real property based on a current.title report with an indication of how these claims.`have already been disposed of. or of how the Trustee proposes to dispose of them': 26�I Name of Claimant Amount Disposition lien position 27�omas Qrst V _ 'and Norma. _M._- Roh_9' n 3 ; ?;n , nn . plus 28 IlDonald L. and Shirlee Hall .interest 61000-00 29 11 plus' interest '10,000.00 ,iDonald_L. and Shirlee. Hall.�.._' 30i1'Bohan.and �1 Hall. attorney's.fees, glus interest :undetermined :I 31 Second Lien Approved by s„m_,r,ar, judgment Approved by su.rmnary judgment Trustee objects 'Trustee' objects James D. and Bessie C. Francis D1O.G.0.00. Trustee objects Notice o.f. fiearTngon ..Mr_AULAY & .eARTLE-M' `Dis -r,ibutio+n P.tocee' ds 1,. ATTORNEYS AT LAW' -. of 612 NORTON eJIL.DINQ SEATTLE. WASHI.NG,TON 981(;4.` (2083 82R-9540 i UIr. �...n .�.._ A�•:.;ii �.a�t%. .I `. ... .�:_r..�_.... ...., _. __AV�..�.'�i1.4�..r.t}.. _.. �.� ,_....._ ..._ _ ..,.�, _s. 5 .. �.. .. ,.. ...(:`:5,_,^, . xi.':., ,. ,. ..:a, Vc._�t r-...fi...i ._..s�.. w. Ti--^•....:� ._ ...;.Asr�' .., ':... :. .. ':� .-yf .r; 4•.:7.. •-�1: :{ i�• - i ....a _.. '.! t .-Y . W., •- .r I't�.� 1 i •r - t l William C..and Margaret M. Spiller 2 Clifford F. Harter 3IThird..lien_position DeWayne M. and E. Lenore 4 Doyle 5 Fourth lien position 2 st_Coast Metal Products, Inc. 7 Fifth lien position International Commercial 8 Collectors, Inc. .9 Sixth lien position.: Timothy P. Coogan 10 1 1211ISeventy lien position Powel, Onstad & Hansen, Inc. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 2,400.00 Denied by summary -judgment undetermined Trustee objects 3,000.00 Approved. by sui .many plus interest judgment 1_,,998._32 _ .._ App_roved•_by___sunMary plus interestjudgment 3,320.47 plus, .interest. 8,708.40 plus.interest 2,515.00 plus interest Denied -by summary judgment Denied by summary judgment Denied,by summary judgment By way of further explanation, the Trustee is objecting.' to the $10,000.00 claim of Donald and Shirlee Hall for the reason that these funds were never directly disbursed.to the Debtor but rather were disbursed to Stanley and Daphne Kaufmann•in December, 1978. This amount was repaid by the Kaufmanns on January 5, 1979. The Trustee objects.to the attorney's fees claimed by the Bohans and I'iaris for- the reason that none of the attorney' S i2zs incur eta were directly related to pursuing their remedies.under their Deed of Trust. The�Trustee is objecting to the claims of James D. and Bessie Francis and of Clifford Harter for the reason that they agreed to accept shares of stock in the Debtor corporation in lieu of payment of their loans. . Any: funds remaining after satisfaction of these lien claims as approved by the court will be disbursed upon subsequent court approval in accordance with the priorities established by §507 of the Bankruptcy Code. Any party desiring to contest the objections to claims by the Trustee indicated above must file'a responsive pleading with i the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and serve a.copy upon the attor-neyi for the Trustee no later than five (5) days prior to the scheduled hearing:"•..The Trustee's,� objections will come on forth aring on the . day of S-ra .�:uy , 1981 at ��; U o' clock 7 _m. ! rn RoiL�om 234, U.. S. Courthouse, Fifth'and`Madison Streets, Settle, inVaJ{�11 11'i l'�..7 tlJ i.l� J8 � (J 1./ •# . DATED this day of October, 1981•, i Roderick N. McAulay s Attorney for Trusteer Notice of Hearing on Distribution of•Proceeds - 2 MCAULAY & E;ARTLE7- .ATTORNEYS AT LAN . 612 NORTAN SUILDINZ . SIZATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104 (203) 625-9540 �}M� -. �. _Y3r "' '� r 'Y� "`�.�-"Y-,iyta3Ez"' ti � br-t&'.r �e os.' -c � ; x ���" K�F �' � �., '+'.�1 'h•s Cd'1' ?r ..sY '$."''�` SRiEET PILE NPSOP-RF Mr. Stanley R. Kauffman Laebugten Wharf, Inc. 16111. ,-b- 1 t_ idmonds, Washington `,. 08620 Dear Mr. Kauffman: RAVE[) AUG 0 3 1y81 Dir. Of Public Wor►c 31 JUL 1981 AUG 11 1981 Dir. Of Public Works Reference: 071-OYB-1-005745 Laebugten Wharf, Inc. Reference our letter of 18 June 1981 concerning your application for a . Department of the Army permit. You were requested to advise this office of your contemplated action on this application by 20 July 1981 or your.applica- tion would be considered as having been withdrawn and the file closed. As no reply was received, your file has been closed. Your application is returned herein. This does not preclude the application being resubmitted. s 1 Incl As stated cc: City of Edmonds City Engineer 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Sincerely, GERALD A. KELLER Chief, Regulatory Functions Branch 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24- 25 26 �27 28 29 30 ' 3.1 32 c . UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE: ) Case No. 80-01814 LAEBUGTEN FISHING WHARF, ) `- INC., a.Washington corp. ) NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S PROPOSED SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Debtor. ) To the Debtor, its creditors and other parties in interest: NOTICE IS.HEREBY GIVEN that the Trustee, Jay Carey, propos s to sell all of his interest'in the tangible personal property of the Debtor to Phase I, Ltd., a limited partnership for the sum of $700.00 cash. This property includes fishing tackle inventory; refrigeraio: and freezer units, cooking grill, coffee makers, tables and chairs, misc. hardware, styrofoam.pads, gasoline, and other'misc. equipment I not a part of the realty. The Trustee recommends acceptance of this offer for the reason that the cost of removalwould diminish the net value of 'the property below the proposed offer. Any party desiring to submita higher offer must do so by delivering to the undersigned attorney for .the Trustee a.written offer which exceeas the present offer by no less than $200.00.and is accompanied by cash or equivalent earnest money of $500.00 within ten (10) days of the date of this notice. Any sale by the Trustee is where is, as.is and without warranty. Any party desiring a court hearing on the proposed sale, must request same by submitting a written request to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court with a copy to the attorney for the Trustee .t within twenty (20) days of the date of this notice. DATED this loth day. of Julv , 1981: � Roderick-N. McAdla Y , Attorney for the Trustee R EI . ED . ' �. J u. 3 1981 Dir Public Works Notice of Trustee's Proposed Mcaut_aY & saRTCErr Sale of Personal Property ATTORNEYS AT"LAW 612 NOra,6.4 uummNG SEATTLE. WASHINGTAN 98104 w.(20S) 625-•95,40 2 3 4 'S 6 7 1 9 10 11 �13 !14 15 16 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 i ' RECEiV;!T? MAY 14 1981 Edmonds City Clerk AY 3 1981 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Dir. ublic Works FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE. ) Czisc No. 110-01814 L.AL•'LiUGTLN FISHING WHARF, +NC:. , a a Washington•corporation, ) NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF P? .OPOSED SALE OF ASSETS Debtor. ) To the Debtor., its creditors and' other parties in .interest: NOTICE IS lwna13Y GIVEN that the: Trustcu' has rucuivud an offer to purchase the fee titles to the real estate on which Laebugten Wharf is located and to'purchase the leasehold interest with Phase I, a limited p4rtne>g4f. i The purchaser i�lPhaa.e I, a limited partnership and the purchase price is $50,0Q0.00'cash'at closingiplus waiyer of all rental'payments due through $ay.3I,.'1981 totalling $35,000.00. The Trustee is to convey title to the fee free and clear;of all' liens and encumbrances except those of Queen City Savings & Loan Association. `. E The Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding to clear the title of the property. A pre-trial conference in this proceeding isscheduled for May 18, at 2;00 p.m. in Bankruptcy Court, Room 234, IJ. S. Courthouse,'Fifth and Madison Streets, Seattl( Washington. The Trustee recommends that this transaction be approved by the Bankruptcy Court for the reason that it represents the best and highest offer the Trustee has received for these assets. Furthe the Trustee can not continue to operate the wharf for the reason that lease payments are in -arrears and a forfeiture of lease is presently lodged with the court pppong satisfactory resolution of this proposed sale,. The Trustee plans to submit to the Bankruptcy Court at the he�r.i.ng scheOujed May 18 at 2:00 p.m. an order approving this sale. Should any creditor or other party in interest desire to object, they must file such objection in writing with the 13ankrul)tcy Court no later than May 15, 19 ) arid, survc a copy of said uhj�:uti.uil on the Trustee that Same date. pATLO this 5th clay of May, 1981, Roderick N. McAulay, Trustee � I Notice to ' Creditors of MCAULAY & BARTLETT Proposgd Sale of 4ssets ATTORNEYS AT LAW a12 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASMINGTON 98104 4*04) 026•9040 �l 2 i . 3 4 5 6 i STREET -FILE' i � l UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT,OF WASHINGTON AT SPATTLE 7 1N ItL: ) CiAso No. I10-01 ti 1 h 8 LAL13UGTLN FISHING WHARF, INC. � ,a a Washington.corporation, ) NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF 9 ) PROPOSED SALE OF ASSETS Debtor. ) 10 D . 11 To the Dubtor.,,its creditors and other parties in intureSL: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Trustuu has rucuivcd an offer to purchase the fee title to the real estate on which 13 Laebugten Wharf is located and to purchase the leasehold interest with Phase I, a limited partnersh*p. 14 The purchaser in Phase I, a limited partnership and the 15 purchase price is $50,000.00 cash at closing plus waiver of all iental payments due.through May 31, 1981 totalling►$35,000.00. 6 mho Tr, !,,tee ; s. tf'? nrl.;",.ay *.i.t;P to the fee free and clear of all liens and encumprance§ except those of Queen City Savings & Loan 17 association. 18 The Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding to clear the title of the,' propgrty:!: A pre I -trial conference -in, this 19.proceeding is scheduled for Maj. l.$f,at 2:00 p.m. in Bankruptcy Court, Room 234,`U. S. Courthouse,.Fifth•and Madison Streets,'Seattl 20 Washington.,, i I 21 The Trustee 'recoimuends that this transaction be clhptovud by the Bankruptcy Court'for the reason .that it represents the best :22 and highest offer the Trustee has received for these assets. 'Further the Trustee can not continue to operate the wharf for the reason 26 that lease payments are in arrears and a forfeiture of lease is presently lodged with the court pending satisfactury resolution %:4 of this proposed Salo. The Trustee plans to submit to the Bankruptcy Court at the hearing scheduled Mav_18 at.2:00_p.m. an order approving this 26 sale. Should any creditor or other party in interest desire to object, they must file such`objuction *n writinct with the Uunkrulll.Cy (;ou:-t i�.0 lal:ur than May 15, 19$1 alid �3oXye a uol,y of• sail .ul.,j.:uti.uil on the Trustee that same date. VATLU this 5th clay .01 May, 1981. Roderick N. McAulay, Trustee I Notice to Creditors of MCAULAY 61 SARTLM ATTORNEYS AT LAW Proposed Sale of f• §Sets 812 NORTON BUILDING #I[ATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104 laoo) 028.9640 , ': � �r -> -•r --i, +.. Viz, ,-r-.� T �r-�� ��-Q-�•6•^.4-•-�--i"�-�e �--T- -�-i�•- i--' E ET_EFI LE I Fk v'10 N %G� j 1 C:_ o ',1=E_cel ,z sfi?� { � -i-:•� - -.}-�. _ .- _ � — �Twr � �YT w� �--- i I �•z ' :� �-a-_-'-f �_-L_(.—':_ I -�-a-{-. .__• '_--�. ..-.+.-n-��� - _ram• i ,-�.--.•_t.-�- '-^•�--s,....-.� �--�_ �._,e._i--... _,•a•-,�.�-« �-^----.�-`-=T-� .�_.{--r-�--�-+ •dam-d--"-+-7- --> ., -�t- rfr- �-+ �--•`- ��/��i,-(�<- --a- i--�--^-�r-�-- �+-�--i--1--•—l--J�-�-�---�.--f-y-.;••••-�..-�>-q--�1--�-•--1"•-j-i-+ -�--r-a-:_T.-.--a _.. _I __..- �' - v •-• -t �Q f H � � pQr� ��Q_ f � �;� ' �fi rt i�71- 1 j -�--;- -- -- --- i d-Y-/-/-D.�----C/�G—f/f-��t f/Ovl--:--.{-i-;-�-:---'r-�`--+--k-"--1-I•�--�- �i-•-j- +i--�----'-- _--- �- cell !' -; :--f -• .. ¢_� Di1%` S7�£�� �� �Q�� !q`Q♦'_t��' j_` �h'$�H ���4i�j-'�Q, i ;�" T-�-,- �• � 'Y- j *�-t-� �i-_'`.fi' �_. a-�_- .{ f 1--I rJI�;�o��,trt .� a -+ y rp" ♦ -. </ Lra.✓G� j, :A uJ Loa. f, in��� ✓� �o s rt � ar%�S� . + �- - : PU .'b l _i c ' -� ✓ v t c.e °s k r 14. V 00 +Q � it &77�_,- 4- _T + t -'�O*�"':?✓tL1"r-ram f!/ > a 717- :6—%Vd °Api'P'�' u/r-�IeA -I �yrt 6u7`-,: zIV d i- 1S b,, wkf n a -t. t ($� r �-+ i'_� t -..-'i'_. + -i• - �-.-,y � .. . } .�--�, { -o y b. ' �,. _ 1.. } "'-'t 1 _+ .�- .; = , ?7° _ (;�(j. . 4 a e b t` 6CJa ✓ + i j t 2C1 H c lu ' s l ^� L� �'l c,��; ' Q / C'- GI_+ 1 M 'i1 2 f G'o1%v�,1r► a hll fr - %r��5 '�G G,N'i°�a H !G rr.r_• -Y _;.. - - � �,._:_ � �l_� ..�_ � � , r :- f � _-.. S I__ : ._1. i -'•• 1' t fi �- -4 -� -+- - -'�-i- � '— --- -ht--� +- ; c -Q P ,_p ✓ e ! h- t -C x t It ✓FS �4� 0 f fi', . —} l > i d { 8- h ' -b- . ♦�+.__.-t 1 �— lb. 4 : -* T 1 _ . 1 •_ __ }2p I � ��} A'1 { .{_ fi _L_-i-i..i .�.. t-_; .{ .i i G ? -'Y _ ^5... - 1 +. 4 t Y r• �- 5-�-_1. ,.1„_� ♦-7��-_j + -�- t-- > -1- .} -.'_ - -- _� 4- .'•. - � T_, 'r_-1'_-�"f'."�"". y `"{"_ �'? - �"t._.-•T 1 _.__t � �---�. _+..- ice- � � - � .�.. � �,� c'�,i'c.�tl�q�'t8v� �; � ;So.u{iVG2+ >�-�'7'��'r+o✓vlaa�f qu a h�'/�Y�,S P a-.4-� -+ _� k - _, _. •� +� p--, -�_�, - -� -* __{.-,r-_ _ -t- r=�-� 5/���'"-�..r O��t�4t_a.tA ;- ��'a � �t19't;- ��-1���4,I"��� �- �p�>S-'dry-����ata�..-�_ � �.'� t-� �- - t-� _ {--e.--�-1 1 ♦ I } �.-+ - . -�- � CtGzti t -: _ .�. + ? : }_- �Iw_ PG �Y�-� -�= :'`'�Y�'u.b -r i � /-o-�- i�i'"i �v'�! : • � ` -%cl:'Gj� $'��7;1-' ' -_ {,_,. �_�.- � -� - ' V .p >--. d - Y i ; } { T - 1 r--j- T i - 1 .+-1 +-:. 1 i. _f _ +. 1 i. � ♦ � a• i---�- _1. a.+ Y _. __�. I 1- J_ i -� � I . � -p �i � � -�- - R k i �- t 4 -� --�- -� � -p -4 IL - �--� a -1�-i--�--t-+--�-*-+ i �_ j_. �- �---� -�--�- -4 -'► ¢- �--�-�k- -d- � -+ i- I � � ' � fi Y-s•-�-+�--f r t- g_�_ I _a+ -} -- ,J1�- --b- � � r--* L - �t -4'--r"-��-'�- �-��---� r--1-_ �-�--+�--� i p �`t--t- -�_' �,."�..._.4 k-- Q-+-.� �-- ' -4 -� 1- � � -j-- I - �. -b-+ , I -T- Yf 1 i -b 1 +-i`--�---�—d---�+---,i_ y.- �.. t-.�--y. � II -•5`--- Y i - Y �1� W h�-�r� c 4--'f.--'�'_-�' -I --}'4• "'fr" i�`�"i� t• } ;. 1. .. - - "fir - t I - - -�-1+--¢-'�--i-- -•L--4 -iI'o'.;¢-P •�_^`Y� -•�`_ -.- :1 ' 9IK .. _i% A% - _:�Ai�=u¢'.-i�?=/� abk;e�� `4--i%A = -MR:y o + - q4- -, .-� .. + I iL - • -+--+- + +- �-' - j----+--I .t , ,.--+-�-i-- -; � � �-+--+._i-_,_,-�-:-.+-Y+-•__.-.t- i �1._.�--,-,J-1-+--+�--h---`-�-!--1--�-----i---� 1--+ -�--a---+- 1- +--y-- + +-+-1 i�dy�'�`✓��`'i ��`'4=l1�.t'7e�t+ Qr�!!� ®�;_, lS�t_li!wa�/'�i - -r-i- , - .- .+ -. _ . .,_�-_� .-.. ..-1 + -t'-:- -I . �--,--i_-,--+ - ram. / «-i-+�_-•- _-}_"- i--• _L i-_. -♦ +-+ i - J -1 +- �- 1 -4-TA �/ �. �� 1 _,-�f!� - •.� _ '� -�-�1 - �Y � � -r-t-�- � �-a. : _! -t- -j-1 •--F- -+- 7--�- f }_ i--1 + I --. h- -+-+ - 1 -•-- + --+----�-�-I- _ . } -�--1 -r �-. t .-.� _. :-- -�-i-t - 9- }-�-- - -�I--}�-i- I-1--I--+--_1-_�-r� 1-I-+--}--� +---y--� -, '-- +--+-t-•-+--,- ' �--r-� .L� +_ I jW7 i9_� 4 %�;o ; �t c toH-rtJ.Il « b t4 k2-v�+ • _�.et--+-sal Q- Ill C �' /��' , -�--r--1 -1..�. i--•_:-� +- _•.-1--�.Y/�(-��/ �. 1�7-7� +�.�- Y �1.��� �f r r'1-��--� 1�-�--`�-�-_: _!.� �C!-� _+� �_�:I�!'tl+_C�+� 1. ,_ i46/ T R ;vl �.,LYurlQST4 -++_L - L- + !--! -1- 1-+ •.- -�--}- i-- - 1 1 .-+ -{-i � �- ��--f- j }-t-� -�=-_�-�- r -1-I- �--f-{--`k � -t -t -I-- 7 -i-- , ,- � ,- l -� � -t- y--l-_ -+ -} -• -It •--+ -+ �--�- __ Y .D fi 1 O t �, ,� ,� i ui LU --- r - W S i-� - ---- - _ -rrt 1 - March 19, 1980 MEI-10 TO: Planning Department FROM: James E. Adams — 741 X v UJ City Engineer: _ _ SUBJECT: SH -8-79 LAEBUGTEN WHA. - 14 C. , ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AND CIiECKLIST The Engineering"Department has reviewed the above subject submittals per your memo dated March 11, 1980. We feel that`a­tull environmental impact statement is required and that.data submitted heretofor is incomplete in the following areas: B.I.F &`B,3.A: The adding of significant amount of concrete pil- ing is iike ly to`increase deposition of beach sand and also affects tide flo�v. patterns. B,3.E, B;16 & 17: The questions of discharge into surface waters, storm water drainage, sanitary sewers and health hazards have been improperly,addressed. Parkin; decks would require oil separator facilities. Site is within present Mendowdale moratorium area which precludes connection to a sanitary sewer system in this area and thus there exists a health hazard. B.13 We recommend that a qualified traffic consultant Fe —engaged by the applicant to assess the impact on transportation and circulation. We note the following; inconsistencies in data submitted: B.13.B The present road giving access to the site is not suite to higher density traffic proposed without considerable mod- ification. There are conflicting stateiiients in the checklist in re- gard to the actual number of vehicles contemplated by the project. However, at the very least, the proposal would increase congestion on existing access road. B.13.F Combined bridge crosses an existing railway and wouldrequirea minimum roadway of 24 ft. clear plus an additional separate S ft.. clear pedestrian sidewalk for a total clear width of 29 to 30 ft., together with proper safety precautions required of a railway crossing bridge. 1' D PW/ j f / ` j% �n 3 zD o Pat Wilson Dt Fred Herzberg DE ... .f•:^::;T,• +: �,..c, �-�- :: ram: --r-�^.'t�'c^: ^�,:,rx. St„i:;�aft�r�;.ry�,;: ,...; ..,: .. ..., w: W....... . _.... �.. �... .... ...�..�,..--:...--r...�.,.....�..,....,....,._.:.,.,-..� i s7R EET ADDRESS ; CITY OF E S PROJEC10E T.ApB1iCTmF1q WHARF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED if?p/Rn The information on this form will be used to determine the effect of your action upon the environment of the City of Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible. 1. LAND Area MeadowdalP Tide T,ntPils Type Sanr3 Limitations 4?1 High nff neck. Description of topography (% slope) Puget Sound Beach (4.2%) N/A NOTE: If grading or filling will Grading: Estimated cubic yards Nnn P exceed 500 cubic yards a gradingand filling plan must be sub - Filling: Estimated cubic yards Non P mitted with the application. Estimated area to be paved (including buildings) 197, 8AO r� f t, Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) S0_n^ n f t , 2. WATER Stream - Estimated flow (cubic feet per second) N/A Will stream be altered? N/A If yes, to what degree? Other water bodies? Puget Seund Impact on storm drainage None Method of handling runoff Gutter system on buildings. Adjacent to shorelines zone? C/W Within 200 feet of MHHW? We are West of MHHW 3. VEGETATION Type and approximate number of trees N/A Minimum diameter of trees to remain % of trees to be removed Ground cover. % to be removed Proposed landscaping, if any Upper parking area will have planters and trees_ 4. EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single multi - Vacant Family Family Commercial Other North X South X East X West X 5. CIRCULATION Estimated increase in auto trips daily Weekdays 100 Additional 1YeekPn8s, Ann j Availability of public transportation None at thi ss time. I 6. AREA OF IMPACT Neighborhood X City-wide Regional 7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY No effect All e ui nment is P1 Puri r_ B. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION RECEIVED equipment. 6M4> MAR 101980 fLai?N'vll 3/za/,50 (11/78) Dir. Ui 1 p•{ OF EOtllonos • I Psw`1tdING DEP7. MAR 1 u 1�100 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT IMPACT STATEMENT Dir. of Puhiic Works I. The following environmental impact statement has.been prepared for proposed enlargement of the facilities at Laebugten Wharf (Ex -Baines Wharf) located on.Puget Sound, north of Edmonds, at Meadowdale Wash., in accordance with the requirements of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act and the City of Edmonds. Discussion of effects on the ecosystem of this immediate area will be concentrated on the Biosphere of the involved littoral zones, and secondary attention will be given to the - inter -relating topographical impact, since for the ourpose of this study all measurable and critical effects will be evidenced by effects on flora and fauna of the proposed construction area. The Environment II. A, The Environment. The Environment of the proposed improvement area is a typical sandy beach littoral zone immediately adjacent and on the north side of the present Wharf. Tidal action will scour approximately 210 feet of the area perpendicular to a maximum high tide line to a minimum low tide line. Approximately 50 feet of the area will be submerged continuously and at depths of O'to 20 feet depending on.wind, wave and atmospheric conditions. B. The Biosphere. Living organisms of the area show the diversity typically found in the intertidal area and vary from the simplest protozoa, espacially flagellates, ciliates and diatoms, and algal Protophyta i to nektonic forms of Invertebrates and Vertebrates such as ��CrJ1�jL-'D maarura-(shrimp)--and various Teleosti (bony fish),'and 5,Z� benthotic forms such as Pagurus alaskensis (hermit crab), MONos CPL,aNjNG UEPT. and Polychaete annelids such as Ner_eis_ (sand worm). III. The Representative Genera and Species. Starting at the top of the food pyramid the most visible species are Hyperprosopon ellipticus and Holconotus rhodopterus ( surf perches) which RECEIVE° are evident around the present structure, especially at high MAR 1 O1980 tide. Also Poricthys species (bullhead), Platichthys Stellat►wos'Puhlir works (starry flounder) and other members of the order Heterosomata. Transitory entry into this area is made by various species of Oncorhyncus (salmon) and possible by Ophiodon elongatus �207 (lingcod) near spawning time (December to March). �T?o'r Smaller fish such as Eulachon and Clupea and possible 1 Gasterosteus form the main diet of these predators. Many other species -are also found here to varying degrees, however their presence is generally ephemeral. Invertebrates include Echinoderms, Molluscs, Annelids, and various Arthopods and virtually all phyla are represented in varying degrees including Porfera, Coelentrata, various worms, ctenophora etc. : The largest of these would include Solaster decemradiata (starfish) Cancer magister & Productus (crabs) and various Coelenterata with a rare incursion made'by dibranchiata both octopod and decapod forms (octopus & squid). IV, Ecological Effects in General. Since thepurpose of this statement is to determine environmental impact, and since this extremely hard to evaluate in both qualitative and quantitative terms, the most cogent discussion can be made by relating'to the present structure the effects of the structure now proposed. 2. ' l ��. ti +li ___. ___ `.t � _....1C �� r i'♦i ....,tk 4 • J. __ 1 3 � 1 However this basic, general statement can be made. There appears to be no reason why the proposed expansion -if actually carried out, should materially alter the topographical or biological character of the area. This is not to say there would be no tempoporary or even permanent effects. These are discussed on the following pages. V. Deleterious eff6cts. In their.construction of this pier there are bound to be some.detrimental conflicts between construction techniques and equipment and organisms of the area, especially the sessile forms. Mobile forms will escape any danger on their 1 own initiative by simply moving from the area. However it is inevitable that certain clams, mussels, sand worms and especially benthotic and burrowing forms will be displaced or killed by construction activity., However this will be of essentially 1 minor impact and of short to medium duration. Proof for this would appear to be the present situation where great abundance of marine life in great diversity can be easily seen immediatly adjacent to and indeed even upon both the new and original structures. Some submerged sections of present pilings will remain in place to 1) minimize environmental impact 2) allow "seed stock" for the new pilings. VI. Beneficial Effects. Enlargement of the facilities 3 years ago increased the population of the previously mentioned surf perch. 2My personal observations conferm an approximate doubling of their population in spite of'increased angling preccure. Also the latest addition to the pier is off limits to angling,providing food, cover and refuge'. In addition to the above statement a definite case can be made,for long term enhancement of the marine enviroment. Presently the Wharf's pilings support a large variety of Molluocs and other comi- 4 sessile biota which definitely attract many marine organisms to, the present site. In fact in bothdiversity and numbers the area surrounding the wharf is much richer than the adjacent unimproved area. Substantiation for the above statement can be found in the present practice of creating artificial reefs and shelter by means of bumping car bodies, correctly prepared tire barriers, and other shelter and monotony breaking features on ocean bottoms of the west coast. These artificial reefs have been proven to enhance marine fauna and flora of the involved area, and were used at the site of the new Edmonds Fishing Pier. In view of the effects of the present facility it would 4ort follow that similar effects would emanate from the expansion Q/N% GO,r�yGi �% of the resent 'structure. Especially since some of the resent Gd yi ��e� rty p p y p , Pura fi� OD pilings will be left in place to avoid disturbing attached P��Sd "ou) n,eHS�t biota, as well as organisims dependent upon their need for food Popal4ryan. and shelter. VII. Review. This area is rich in marine life of many forms and is made up of a typical sandy beach intertidal zone. Construction of a new pier would not adversely alter the affected environment or the fauna and flora of the area, in fact in type and variety life forms should increase. Topographical and Geological effects should prove minimal. Recreational and L/ Economic improvements would be realized. 2 A stable increase of a species near the top of the food chain is only possible if all life forms on the lower levels have increased. The Surf purch increase indicates that biological diversity and numbers were enhanced b the QrevAous enlargement of Laebugten Wharf. Gary I lson, Biologist i° ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a. major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review -now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE; This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent T.AF'Ri1CTF,N I+VAARF TN(' 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 1h111 7hth Pi W. d mnnri 3. Date Checklist Submitted 1122180 4. Agency -Requiring Checklist City of Edmonds Planning Dept 5. dame of Proposal, if applicable Same as above 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: Tha r)i nn i , tn remove the existi ng wood pier and real '3c'e it with All building G �Vi l l •— be co trurtPd f Oa S or re an d a 1 e 7, ocation oroposalre(descrie t e p ysical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Me.adowdale Tide Tands Tnf 11 (B oumc bay,) 1E7,8h� ft. of beach area covered by dock The dock will not —set on the sand, and therefore will brovide a habitat for the marine life The intire area is in'the water at high tide. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal 5/81 9. List of all Permits,'Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): City of Edmonds, Army Corps of Engineers, Shoreline management, Ecology. Department of fisheries, Department of game, Department o! transportation, Department of social and health Services.,Departmer. of.natural Resources Marine Land Management, tate Parks and y ion oKepnooy doric Presei10. ocou nave anYp}ansT04 ureA'Rions,xasioor ur activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No_ 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected.to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: CorT)s of F„ rye--peter}t I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X There is m:Lnimal disturbance of the soil by the pi -le- The driving C)f the 1pile ivill compact the sand a li-ttle, and only in a smnll area - The water flow, and erosion will not be effected by the piles- 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of flu ambient air quality? V X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: There are no emissions from the plant. All equipment is electricals operated. N_)la U12 -2-1 fin• 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course 4� or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- X face water runoff? -2- r, L, YES MAYBE NO c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, p� dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f.. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals,.or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters?. X i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Explanation: The pile is only 14" in diameter_ The amount of water displaced is insignificant, Since the pile is the only thing in the water there is no change in the volume of water_ 4. Flora.. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X c., Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to.the normal replenishment of exist- ing species? X d. Recution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? X - - dup .n and ex1jansion of exisfiag -3- YES MAYBE, NO 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: Along with Flora, Fauna will increase ar, it did wh oftainal addition was installed. 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: The new equipment is electric Hydrolic, and therefore quieter than present equipment. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new ght or glare? X Explanation: The glare from the water will be lessened by the meta and concrete, but on the viest side the glass may cause some additiona glare,. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Thi a area i a 7.oned QAV� Thi a i c: mir r3asirp_ r Ise_ GLf Qj,r- land_ "T10 -7 e.ii.-I-r%-! �U1�� �;' (��,:,Vl�.i� Ili) ��I L• 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: The fishing will increase because of the inereaapp_nnla_ti� created by our increase in coverage for natural habitat+. YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a ri-sk of.. an explosion or release of hazard ous,substances (including, but'not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals br radiation) in the event of an accident or upset condi- tions? Explanation: No more than at : resent, but most likely l ess- 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Explanation:Because of the boat moorage some may want to live close to their boat. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: If the people desire to be (Ouse to their monrage- 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili ties; or demand for new parking? X c. Impact upon existing transportation Ali systems? X d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or,movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air-traffic? X f. -Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: Because of the Restaurant there -will 11 be i Pak ti mPc fnr fore there will be a hazzard to the foot trafic- The -nqr1rJnF___rLi2_1_ be taken care of in our expansion- wn are instn1ling ennugh' -5- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? X c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X_ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? X Explanation: The fire = raterti on will hP Pnm-rr herniirP the i nti re rlPrk will he rnnrrete - the trnrkr, wi l l he ahl P to get r.l n,aer to nnv�f_i rP WP will rnpnl y our num PPruri ty fnr the fari 1 i tv_ Tf the rpmrm_ ini ty 15. energyeea alfetp propoo f resuptc inase of roaa use. a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: We will use more energy, but it is impossible to 32rojec tow much - 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in as near new systems or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? X f..Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: We will increase all utilities storm dranap'e will not be effected. 1J("" ,;�1�. -6- s YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result J in the creation of any health hazard or potential health.hazard (excluding OZ mental health)? Explanation: There is no Health hazard caused by our facility, every bit of our expansion inproves the Health hazards that now exist. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Explanation: The expansion improves the beauty,_ of the area. 'We will be removing an unsitl wood structure an e a ' a structure that conforms with the area.. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? X Explanation: It will increase the usefulness of the area_ and it will make the area useful to more types of recreation. 20. Archeological/Historical. .Will the proposal result in an a teration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or O building? X ' �. Explanation: There are no historical or archeological sites in this area. (,Jha-r kGoL) r '1 H G-1. g)ei 6,r, iV &-.y WoG,p 6,r,o'uCTu1 L( , C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaratic or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT:( Manager, and Vice President Laebugten Wharf Inc. & GaryNelson , Biologest -7- MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OSIFIEET FILE Planning Department • March 19, 1980 James E. Adams City Engineer SM - 8 - 7 9 LAE�BUG�TEN �JHARF ENVIROI'1MENTAL DATA AND CIiECKLIST The Engineering Department has reviewed the above subject submittals per your memo dated March 11, 1980. We feel that a full environmental impact statement is required and that data submitted heretofor is incomplete in the following areas: B.1.F & B.3.A: The adding of significant amount of concrete pil- ing is likely to increase deposition of beach sand and also affects tide flow patterns. B.3.E, B.16 & 17: The questions of discharge into surface waters, storm water drainage, sanitary sewers and health hazards have been improperly addressed. Parking decks would -require oil separator facilities. Site is within present Meadowdale moratorium area which precludes connection to a sanitary sewer system in this area and thus there exists a health hazard. B.13 We recommend that a qualified traffic consultant e�engaged by the applicant to assess the impact on transportation and circulation. We note the following inconsistencies in data submitted: B.13.B The present road giving access to the site is not suited — to higher density traffic proposed without considerable mod- ification. There are conflicting statements in the checklist in re- gard to the actual number of vehicles contemplated by the project. However, at the very least, the proposal would increase congestion on existing access road. B.13.F Combined bridge crosses qn existing railway and would a minimum roadway of 24 ft. clear plus an additional separate 5 ft. clear pedestrian sidewalk for a total clear width of 29 to 30 ft., together with proper safety precautions required of a railway crossing bridge. DAMPS E . ADAMS PW/ j f_���� 3 �D/�O at Wilson Dt Fred Herzberg Dt . � February 29, 1980 LAEBUGTEN WHARF FACILITY EXPANSION PROJECT Effect upon "Transportation/Circulation...."•. portion.of Environmental Checklist a. Passenger..vehicle egress and •.ingress. movement.:. will increase by 285 to �� 300 .vehicles per day with. peak traffic .flow..occurr-ing, between 5 pm - 7 pm. i b . Open parking for 172 vehicle's -is -provided for in.. the design.. during peak traffic. flow.hour.s. Additional.covered_ parking. for. as many as..56 vehicles could be utilized.if required. c. No impact upon existing transportation...systems..is.anticipaated. d. A minor increase of delivery•vehicle.movement is -anticipated to the restaurant. facility. However.... no increase..in. vehicle .loads ..is expected from those.at present. e. The.facility..expansion involves additional-boat_.storage..of_ a maximum 150.boats. Based on. past experience.. ..this..will.. involve maximum additional .waterborne triffic..of .15-20 _boa.ta .on 'any given day. f. The only. public .access road (76th :Place, West):. to the facility appears to be. structurally .sound. based .on :l) a.. visual ..inspection .2) the fact that. no embankment f ilures. have occurred�in the -vicinity of the roa war in the past,- and 3) no major...increase. in roadway loading are ercFectected. However, the roadway. is...steep....rela.tively narrow, and has rather.. low sighting. distances . in. two locations..... It is felt that additional precautionary signing..would be..advisable. . RECEIVETP I .. t PAR 5'80 RECEIVED CITY Of EDMONDS MAR 101980 PLANNING DEPT, 814— Dir. Of PuNin Works FORM NO. MEM. 88T Cl 'Y OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th North EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 980020 DEPARTMENT: STET FILE SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT, PART 1 IS RETURNED WITH REPLY File No. �3 L Fee:4,s �V RECEIVED Date Filed: NOV 3 0 '79 TY Uf EDMONDS APPLICATION FOR jANNING DEPT. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO THE APPLICANT: This is an application for a substantial development permit and is authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with the appropriate local, state, or feder- al officials to determine whether your project falls within any other permit systems, since a permit under the Shoreline Management Act will not excuse the applicant from compliance with any other local, state or federal ordinances, regulations or statutes applicable to the project. 1. Name of applicant bi10—L42 T0A ,m,LI1),en VVRAL) LAIr 2. Mailing address_/6 // 3. Relation of applicant to property:. Owner Lessee Contract purchaser Other (specify) 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if known, city 'or town, and county; otherwise give distance and direction to nearest town): /U// )L E) W Ems/ S'/,�/, 6. Legal description of property: lo�s 2 6)�' 11AeaUow6leJe 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands:_ &?3 d /2 f,do 8. Current use of the property with existing improvements; AX,,-kT SyY T� i ko � j Gl u r^l� l 9. Describe proposed project: 10. Nature of the shoreline. (Describe type, such as beach, bank or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any. { ' ck 12 Q�,l;� �?fa 0 l� !T �,.._, arr...sL'•.,::+n�ale�4..k.ta.��M�1.�I�� - .�Fi.WM. 7' .., .�...$,�I!��B�SA�6�l�:'Su�i rRY�`i�-+��.r�Vk' �� iE� .. �.. ;�= ": :.. �_.'+!•'.`-r '!e �.i'!�r'T?z��^"<K- k $ '^.'r'+k '4,s'+^�.'b+y�-i; :era+.,. s<"e x T a;s '�A" 76.'1 � ,.r , r ... ..+t .. r �,". j.^. �, .;"?�', ' a r: • r=�'•m�gS,;r-'��t , r:. • C�IV ELF 0 30'19 G1TY Of EDMONDS PLANNING DEPT. 11. Project diagrams: draw all maps to scale, clearly indicating scale on lower right corner of the map. Attach all maps to application. (a) ''SITE PLAN MAP. Include on map: (1) Site boundary and dimensions in -vicinity of project. (2) Land contours using 5-foot intervals or cross sections. If project includes grading, filling, or other altera- tion of contours, then either: (i) Indicate existing and proposed contours and items (3) through (8) below; OR (ii) Provide two.cross sections, one showing existing ground elevations and height of structures, the second showing proposed ground elevations and height of proposed structures, with both showing (4) below. (3) Size and location of existing improvements which will be retained. (4) Ordinary high-water mark. (5) Size and location of proposed structures. (6) Maximum height of proposed structures above existing grade level. (7) State type and amount of proposed fill. (8) Proposed utilities. (b) VICINITY MAP. Indicate relation of site to adjacent lands and the uses to which they are put for at least 400 feet in all direc- tions from the project site. I •__��1i��. KO�I�� 1�rh�. �, , am the above -named applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and hereby state that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are, in all respects, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (Signature PK`KOrI"rN4.A:v"r"f_',#a44;.{. CITY OF ���S PROJE VE ENVIRONMENTAL SESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED ZI The information on this form will be used to determine the effect of your action upon the environment of the City of Edmonds. Please answer each question as thoroughly as possible. 1. LAND 1 c11 I C+lJs' Area l,n�: 2 -- II nac����i�C,�a oils Type �r :,1,�n� �.�/, :j,,,JKmi tations N,;.,< <, Description of topography (% slope) i��>i /lvncwt_ NOTE: If grading or filling will exceed 500 cubic yards a grading Grading: Estimated cubic yards j�;�,,,,, and filling plan must be sub - Filling: Estimated cubic yards_j,I„,�a mitted with the application. Estimated area to be paved.(including buildings) (IiN 12j'Jz ' 'wg s�� rl Estimated area in open space (pervious surface) 2. WATER Stream - Estimated flow (cubic feet per second) Will stream be altered? If yes, to what degree? Other water bodies? Impact on storm drainage Method of handling runoff Adjacent to shorelines zone? -�� C`'o, ILA4ithin 200 feet of MHHW? 3. VEGETATION Type and approximate number of trees 01A111k. Minimum diameter of trees to remain % of trees to be removed Ground cover Proposed landscaping, if to be removed any /�) I �I. �. \� ;�� hn k' ) 4 1A %. K o.�t 4. EXISTING LAND USE WITHIN 300 FEET RADIUS OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Single Multi - Vacant Family Family Commercial Other North South v East RJR i , r); � 1��;� N�, •�l.�r,. st 4�1_ 5. CIRCULATION Estimated increase in auto trips daily 7 0 0 p Availability of public transportation 6. AREA OF IMPACT Neighborhood t�_` City-wide Regional 7. EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY a lA NI-- 8. CHANGES IN NOISE GENERATION Al,,i IV k" nref_VE NOV 3 0 '79 (11/78) crry OF EDMONDS PLANNING DEPT. RECEIVED '30'79 Clnr of EDkMDs ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST tiNI G DEFT. Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to those questions now will help all agencies involved undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the permit for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts that will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all agencies involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "not applicable" (N/A) and continue on to the next question. S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ti A. BACKGROHNn I. Name of Proponent pC-brie,t�l-, 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent a y.� 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable, 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature: y 1ii'IIS.r !)1 �xrC/' lL. )fin[ n, o i !+( rl�ir �(' L�r1�J� � ,�•.yl l��1 (�i�C 1 h 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): LAI � I1 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal W 11, /r%911 9. List of all Permits,•Licenses, or Government Approvals Required for all Proposal (federal, state, and local — including rezones): 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N 0 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected.to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: hit 0,4.-1" ��'^„'��•! r9 `"7 /'r�, (. ( �r•„• -,i n� %�- c i . r� "r l'7� 3!'��r iS -1- B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required). YES MAYBE NO 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? v b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ✓ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? ✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the . bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ✓ Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of sur- face water runoff? ✓ -2- 4 c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO M d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ✓ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ✓ h. Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, deter- gents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or ✓ other substances into the ground waters? i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ✓ Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (in- cluding trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ✓ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ✓ c. Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to.the normal replenishment of exist- - ing species? ✓ d. Re4ution in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? v' Explanation: -3- YES MAYBE NO 5. Fauna. WIll the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or ✓ microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? c. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: c;_(�ri�c1i E' I�l��li�[.;� C �' .- i�'; Ls_nInFGNt 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? -� Explanation- 1. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new fight or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource?y b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: _a_ YES MAYBE NO 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or release of hazard- ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an'accident or upset condi- tions? ✓ Explanation: 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Explanation: Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? r f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ✓ Explanation: C`ti ,_\V �I-A ',� h ia�,��i'�r.l�- ice. ,�,^ T,� F r �c r r n 11 -5- YES MAYBE NO 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ✓ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ✓ f. Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: T,,,-,rNc'..(° )?nJ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in as need-7—or new systems or alterations .to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? Sewer or septic tanks? II�Y` e. Storm water drainage? f.. Soli d waste and disposal? Explanation: ,k PL2 V i c'- a \ %" ik -6- 1 YES MAYBE NO 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quan- tity of existing recreational oppor- tunities? 1 _ Explanation: 'I 10 :�1 \ �.e 1^�zAS e VLo. os-e Ctlk K es:s LsC W Fre0 ,k 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? v Explanation: C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declarati or non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. PROPONENT: -7- � ` p wtr�aa�Y If1..AND i PUGET ' e, �C4 - - P.Y : r VICINITY MAP r PROPERTY LINE EX/STINGh fTRt/GTt/#tr&S PROPOSED STRU&TuRES BOAT /IOIST3 CI eOAT SANI TARK 7-ANK Q PutwPIN4 CoNMiGT10N TIDAL FLEYATIOM POINT +O-7 'fl V A L ELEVATION eANTON R • — pET/411. NUMBER ®Z SN GET NuMOE� LEGEND PE"IT APPLICATION FOR '. LAE1811GTOW MIMAQF I0IC. PURPOSE OF CONSTOWe-TI04: WAVE PROTECTION 4 FACILITY EXv41451 orJ FACILITY LvGATab AT ; 14111 740L PLACE WEST' CITY OF: EDtMONDS couaTY or-*. $Noi4o %1 SH STRTE OF: WASH I�TrhA RECEIVED NOV 30'79 CITY OF EDMONDS. PLANNING DEPT. am . -1 LAEl5U6TOW WHARF INC. FACT L ITY EXPANSION 071-Oyb-I-OOs?gT V1C1 N I TY MAP LEGEND 0lt1.+NO- AL jilow At -I Gl T 0WNeR; ftRLINGToN A�ORTA/E"RA/cRo4D A{ort : AtO ADTAcENT "11TR-44. Sa14D1Mq 3 - SraucrvRES EXT • ON F.4R TR�� RSV RAP 4'I `• SEA WALL 1 y i PIER sTRuC rljgES 1 1 v TG Be REMG VED I� vl _ e c44Q �. °• 3 z f, Nil I + -11 lot 8/ 1 q,'+' z �W c 1 - - - --- - — - �- 4-o h- W 1 M',LW s 0.0e �' 0 - u� p je 1 1�- LtNe •— 4 11'.'WU. v 1 1 of �• ► _� '� H 1 � iLTeR j���F- TO --♦ Z I ( re 8s AgmoveD) W � 1 u h G R PC•EIVED Y o NOV 3 0 79 p CITY OF EOMONOS Z PLANNING DEPT. h - a OWNERS: TAMES UAI NE5 I6gzo ?(.TM- WEST EDMoNDS i WASN• f IJE46tgT HAINEI %eArT4C, "Sit. A/OTE s MO ADTACENT• 3TRUCTt/ R ES 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 /S7'��� EXT. Access PIER EXT. RIP -RA G8' (To BE REPLAcaD) � SEA WALL G K `/DD'� SEED 8q `AKhI4 2 SO ' SNFt iSoF s) PLAN ' 1 �co 1 r � r 1 cc V3 Q 40 i X w al 1 Q ♦.AEBUGToN V -7 FACILITY �.y RECEIVED. NOV 3 0'79, CITY OF EDMONDS• PLANNING DEPT. ew� t r eo - If--�p'-•� IfZO� IA LEVELS— RES'STAURANT 20 — 10 — 0- •-10 — qo— f+LEVEL — I I MAIANA O rn II II II. II II II �I II I'� 'I �I I) - II ,P• �� �� Q �� 4 u. - ji G 4� u la LI Liu ,i4 II II lI U ;� ll J.,Li LI I �l .J w I. RppC, P -- , I {�-20�,I<- RC ----►ice 20 �{�— x r. _ c AK . 1' -C $TQ UCTU" ® wash ELgyATI okj fCALi: NR1�,1 /ems s� ilk 3 100 — — — — AF== F====1F===== r20 ---4 10— v o 0 10- `' .i4 SLgl P RAP WALL - I REINFORCED CONCRETE PILII — zo to. G. ( TY? ) RECEIVED NON 30'79 CITY OF EDMONDS, PLANNING DEPT. ® NORTN ELEVATION Vil►T. J 4 LAEBu6TON WHARF INC. FACILITY EXPANSIOM 071-OYB -1-005745 - PROPOSED FACILITY -- - EXPAN S I ON AL f:p-R. 0 paws. Nw S-Z cam -un am mimimi� ism ui� A(0l9 : C• Z. P. COHCRETc- A4, S PLAN N REgD: TO BR/NG SEGiION _1_� �! ` o T&,e L6VCL SNow^+ AsscoweL-Y OF SkeAK M/Ar1LR Li��.ow THis �o�rvr ELEVATION - ■ s ■ &ELANI —PATTERN LAYOUT $"€ND PLAMK C TYP. PATTERN FIbeKea L....o- RGKNFORCF.D A•roora�zab $ELTJN4 _-Y P- J PATTERI NB66 _) V . e ELEYATrDN NOTES : THIS T/g.C- Tb 8 E Flip WITM FOLYSTYMCAM 13 RS It PLOA V A) 4 DOUC AS M.D. $Y TIPPER /ND oR EQ- OF �7YP. LAEBQGTON W ARF INC. FACILITY EXPANSION 07 I-ClYB-1- 0O5?'t5 RECEIVED) PROPOSED 030'79 FACILITY CITY OF EDMONDS E " PAN SIO`A' FI.ANNING DEPT. GR c. o L"T f-of Rw AL CA LLI I �I�S� • 6TREET FILE 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY . SEATTLE DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX C-3755 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98124 20 November 1979 PURI IC KHMRq! Reference: 071-OYB-1-005745 Laebugten Wharf, Inc. Application has been received from Laebugten Wharf, Inc., 16111 76th P1. W., Edmonds, Washington 98020 (ATTN: Stanley R. Kauffman, tele- phone (206) 743-2211) for Department of the Army permit in accordance with Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 for cer- tain work described below and shown on the inclosed prints. PROPOSED WORK: a. Location: In Browns Bay, Puget Sound at Edmonds, Washington. b. Physical Character: Construct pier and buildings and install floating breakwater. c. Purpose (as explained by the applicant): Expansion of restau- rant, tackle shop, offices, dry boat storage and parking; breakwater provides wave protection. The State of Washington is reviewing this work for consistency with the approved Washington Coastal Zone Management Program. Preliminary review by the Seattle District indicates that this work may significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The prepa- ration of a Federal Environmental Impact Statement may be required. Preliminary determinations indicate that the activity does not affect endangered species, or their critical habitat, designated as endan- gered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 844). Formal consultation pursuant to Section 7 of the Act with the Department of the Interior is not required for this activity. Presently unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical or histori- cal data may be lost or destroyed by work to be accomplished under the requested permit., The work is not located on a property registered in the National Register of Historic Places. 071-OYB-1-005745 The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered; among those are conserva- tion, economics, esthetics, general environmental concerns, historic values, fish and wildlife values, flood damage prevention, land use, navigation, recreation, water supply, water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Comments on these factors will be accepted and made part of the record and will be considered in determining whether it would be in the.best public interest to grant a permit. Comments should refer to the refer- ence number shown above and reach this office, Attn: Permit Section, not later than 19 December 1979 to insure consideration. 1 Incl Print (4) 2 MM o/ A Ab t r;1 wFX1ZT1)lG R/PRAP 13W- k,41.EA0 - I o . EY If.� T. '�RFq 1 �,/V ! BOAT RgluovE I A,s J `•SoArr4gN r + f I t C EXIST IV4G STRUC'TUPr 5) x SCALE 1 = 100 PURPOSE: WAVE PkWrECTIOVI 4 GAPA13SIOM OF- RESTAURAIJT TAc.t,ci._E SHOP OFFICES UPY SOATS'"IO PAGE t PARKIN6 OATUM M LL1N = a,001 ►J, 0-:5, J ADJACENT PROPERTY OMENS: O Z'E2i2.Y NAT-TOX M Z mp �.t 4� v 4,05/,10 �4c, F p , �PBrr�+nv+1�c V 1 CI N ITY MAP p � 2 SCALE IN MILES FROM: NAUTICAL GNART 18445 07/-OY13-I-005745 PROPOSED BREAKWATER PIER BUI LDING5 IN BROWNS BAY) PUGET SOUND AT EDMONCS //�� 3: COUNTY OFSNOHOMISHSTATE WA. V �AMESy NER8E62i HAINE`, APPLICATION BY t�.aebug+en Wharf SHEET J OF 4 DATE /G%/O%7,q 5 a QIn w �S Y A v EXT. ACCESS P)ER EXT. Roc IP-RAP G8o � ° o (To BE RE7LACr-b SEA WALL Z VI a q Q � • 0 ,� .,�� 20 � m 0 � � cP 2 V p !` Q. Q oC 41 w S//UGC E- O ar r w � 8-7 0 o� AMW Aft� (00 ELCdS)Lf— -I - I _- _--- mLEVELNA OF i I I III-, 10 0 -Fl- 411, 1 T, !:A Ob IF af '_;i 4 - I! u I - 1: 0 161 Lit np zp� A '- 60- q0- )o 0- Sn U11. 4541 - 250 Li 16 R�P 20, sxr. 21 Q.0 STIC UCTW" cryp') 100 J?FjNP06kkEj) �ONCRETC PILIA14 RCP) Y'p. I to 0 DII-OYB-1-005745 PROPOSED BREAKWATER, PIER t BUILDIWC.S X7" BRowt4s BAY, PUGET SOUND Ai' EDMONE)_5 C-00 NTY OF Snajov,- 34 STATE VJj APPLkC-ATj0W13YtLaelciu ev) WHARF INC. S H Q M T 3 of~ 4 DAT cm / ollol 7_9 y're" srRi4ocl (TYD.) �•yb•CT�VP1 R POLYlTypk"a- f16lD TIRE'S (TYP.) f` imp Noce: C,Z.P. CoNCRtTG As R[qD, To BRiN6 SacrioN To 7Na Level- SNow- � a yl-fZ s Sea (7aTA#L.6 A7st.w�a.Y Dr Sr+eAK WATaI[ lbs"w T,1is L E� VAT IO iJ _�- t1l F�aaiaoa..... R �IA1/URCa ,tweoa�i:a� PATTERN y�« At 1�ri - - U31a Tuts (TVA) ® e�eyAT1oN NoTZS TNIs i7aE Tb 8B FILLED W17U PoLrs-rratwr: t*:K*,) 906IC FLoArl+NQ. Doti AS MA&I>, 3Y 'TOPPER WD oR E0- 071-OYS-1-00.57,95 PROPOSED BREAKWATER) PIER BUILDINCGS TN BROW NS BAY, PUGET SOUND AT EOMOND'S COUNTY OF SNOHOmi5H STATE WA, APPLICATION BY: Luelougten WNARF�=NC. S 4 E >ET A 0 F 4 D AT' 10//0/79 were op STATE OF P x WASHINGTON e �y� 1889 a0y� Dixy Lee Ray Gouemor DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Olympia, Washington 9W POW753.= Mail Stop PV-11 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Notice of Application for Water Quality Certification and for Certification of Consistency with the Washington Coastal Zone Management Program 20 NOvem b e r 1979 Notice is hereby given that a request is being filed with the Department of Ecology for certification, as provided in Section 401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, that a proposed discharge to navigable waters, resulting from the project described in the Corps of Engineers Public Notice No.071-0YB-1-001745, will comply with the applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Notice is also given that a request is being filed with the Department of Ecology for concurrence, as provided in Section 307(c)(3) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended (P.L. 94-370; 90 Stat. 1013; 16 U.S.C. 1456(c)(3)), that .the above described project will comply with the Washington Coastal Zone Management Program and that the project will be conducted in a manner consistent with that Program. Any person desiring to present views on either or both (1) water pollu- tion considerations pertaining to the project or (2) considerations pertaining to the project's compliance or consistency with the Washington Coastal Zone Management Program may do so by providing his views in writing to the Department of Ecology, ATTN: Interagency Operations Section, Olympia, Washington 98504, within 20 days of publication of this notice. 7 y STREET FILE 09 �3 Councilman Carns asked if there had been a report from the State Highway Department regarding SR524 indicating they will comply with the Council's decision that right- of-way will be taken equally from both sides of that street. Public Works Director Leif Larson responded that they had indicated they were going ahead with the first phase and they are studying the second phase and will be replying to .the City. P..l,lat/ Councilman Carns asked that the State Highway Department be requested to send the ✓�l� �rhCity a letter stating that they intend complying with the Council's intent that 5' will be taken from each side of the street for the right-of-way. MAYOR Mayor Harrison advised there would be a short Executive Session following this meeting to discuss personnel and property matters. Mayor Harrison stated two people were in the audience from the Seaview Park area and they had brought to his attention that the problem of noise and traffic still existed there. He suggested a possible solution to the problem may be to restrict the use of that park to children 10 years of age and less. He said he would like to work with the Parks and Recreation Division to see if they could reschedule the older users to other parks. The Council indicated the Park Board should work on this problem. MOTION: COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GOULD, THAT THE SEAVIEW PARK C.6, ,k9,vl PROBLEMS BE REFERRED TO THE PARK BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION AND THAT A REPORT AND RECOM- ,,4MENDATION BE GIVEN THE COUNCIL IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Carns was not present for the vote. / DISCUSSION OF BRACKETT'S LANDING, UNION OIL BEACH, AND LAEBUGTEN WHARF ✓AREA The Staff had prepared a report stating the problems and suggested solutions. Community Development Director John LaTourelle noted that one solution had been to move the traffic one way (north) on Railroad Ave., and he suggested that be deferred in light of the intermodal report given this evening. Councilman Carns said he had been going to the waterfront frequently and had noted a large increase in police activity. Police Chief Marlo Foster said they have been averaging 10-20 citations at Brackett's Landing each evening, mostly for parking and illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. Councilman Carns said the Police Department is down in manpower and he could not imagine this amount of police activity being continued without other areas suffering. He discussed the various solutions the Staff had suggested and did not find them adequate, some of them requiring funds which are not available. He noted that last evening he had seen more Edmonds residents at Brackett's Landing than in the past, and he attributed that partly to the policing which has been occurring, but he felt the problem would increase as soon as the policing is reduced. He suggested that all parking, except for the handicapped, be eliminated from Brackett's Landing as he did not feel the City should tolerate the illegal activities occurring there. Mr. LaTourelle responded that parking is needed in the area. He said the problem occurs mainly in the evening hours, but the beach is used on summer afternoons by families. One of the solutions the Staff had suggested was to close the parking lots at Union Oil Park and Brackett's Landing at 8:00 p.m. It was now suggested that those lots be closed to entering traffic at 8:00 p.m. so that families spending the evening there would not have to leave. Councilman Gould noted that there are two schools of thought regarding the waterfront. One group of residents along the beach is looking to the City for protection of their property and privacy. Another group says the beaches are a part of the City and they should be able to utilize them. He felt the Council should be careful not to take the kind of action that defeats the use of the beaches. Councilman Herb commented that everybody can use the beaches but they must comply with the rules, and the young people who go down there do not observe the rules and it intimidates everybody else, so that one group takes over the beaches. He noted that there is very much to do in this area for recreation, and that the City had no obligation to preserve either of these beaches for anyone who was not willing to follow the rules. He was opposed to eliminating the parking. COUNCILMAN CARNS MOTION: THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN, THAT THE PARKING LOTS AT UNION OIL BEACH Amended AND BRACKETT'S LANDING BE CLOSED TO ENTERING VEHICLES AT 8:00 P.M., STARTING IMMEDIATELY, AND THAT THE SITUATION BE REVIEWED AT THE OCTOBER 2, 1979 COUNCIL MEETING. Councilman Gould suggested it might be better to go by daylight instead of a definite 8:00 p.m. It was also commented that October was too far away to reassess the situation. Amendment COUNCILMAN CARNS, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SECOND, AMENDED HIS MOTION TO SET JULY 3, 1979 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 - May 29, 1979 Amendment FOR REVIEW OF SITUATION. COUNCILMAN HERB THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GOULD, (Failed) THAT THE CLOSING TIME BE ONE -HOUR BEFORE SUNSET. Police Chief Foster stated that by that time of night the activity will have increased beyond control. He also was not in favor of such an indefinite time. THE MOTION TO AMEND WAS WITHDRAWN, AS WAS THE SECOND. THE MAIN MOTION THEN CARRIED. DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION PROCESS 'Community Development Director John LaTourelle had submitted a report outlining the proposed program. The first part of the program consists of an analysis of the City's development review procedures and is being done by a consultant, Felix Reisner. He had recommended that the City adopt a hearing examiner system and create a permit coordinator position. The second part of the program involves rewriting and revising the City's development regulations. Several chapters of a proposed Community Development Code were submitted. Councilman Carns expressed concern about 20.80.020 B of the proposed new Code because he felt it was too structured. He felt that people should not be required to speak or provide input at a public hearing in such a specific order. The intent of this section was discussed. Felix Reisner gave a brief summary of the hearing examiner concept. The Council felt all board and commission members MOTION: should know about the proposal to have a hearing examiner. COUNCILMAN HERB MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GOULD, THAT EACH AFFECTED BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBER BE SENT s Lti, A WRITTEN NOTICE TO ATTEND THE SCHEDULED JUNE 11, 1979 DISCUSSION OF THE ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Reisner asked if he should continue work MOTION: on the hearing examiner process. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, THAT THE HEARING EXAMINER CONCEPT BE PURSUED IN DETAIL. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT FROM SENIOR CENTER ON VIEWING TOWER Councilman Nordquist said he had attended the Senior Center Board of Directors' meeting and he reported that they do not want the viewing tower but they would like to have the funds put into the expansion of a part of building. He noted, however, that progress has already been made into the working drawings and that it would be wise to set aside those funds for contingencies which undoubtedly will arise as work MOTION: progresses. COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, THAT THE LETTER FROM THE SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS BE ACCEPTED, IN WHICH THEY STATE THAT THEY DO NOT WANT THE VIEWING TOWER, BUT THAT THE COUNCIL RECOMMENDS THAT THOSE FUNDS BE USED WHERE NEEDED IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE, BUT NOT FOR BUILDING EXPANSION, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY WILL BE A CONTINGENCY FUND FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING FUND. MOTION CARRIED. There was no further business to come before the Council, and the meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 8:55 p.m. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - May 29, 1979 STREET FILE May 24, 1979 MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison Mayor FROM: Marlo Foster, Police Chief Fred Herzberg, City Engineer Jim Jessel,.Manager, Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: DISCUSSION _OF_BRACKETT'S_LANDING, UNION OIL BEACH AND-LAEBUGTEN WHARF AREA The Police Department, the Public Works Department, and the Community Development Department have been working together to improve the traffic circulation on our waterfront and de- crease the undesired and illegal use of Union Oil Park and Brackett's Landing. The following is a list of the problems which presently occur on our waterfront, along with a list of potential solutions. PRf1RT.RMC 1. Traffic Flow Problems — There are many vehicles "cruising" down Main Street, Railroad Avenue and Admiral Way, to our parks, creating speeding and volume problems. 2. Parking Lot Backups - When the existing parking lots at Union Oil Park and Brackett's Landing are filled, traffic circulation patterns slow down, creating backups on Admiral Way, Railroad Avenue and Main Street. 3. Illegal/Undesired Park Practices - The inappropriate use of the beach parking lots as gathering places discourages family use of our beaches. 4. Inadequate pedestrian and bicycle access along Railroad Avenue - Pedestrians leaving the ferry are confronted with many obstacles to their use of the waterfront. SOLUTIONS 1. Additional funding for policing of the parks. 2. Closing the beach parking lots when they are full. 3. Closing the parking lot at Union Oil Park and Brackett's Landing at 8:00 p.m. Memo to Mayor Harrison May 24, 1979 Page 2 4. Changing Railroad Avenue to a one-way direction (north), between Dayton and Main Streets, to dis- courage cruising and increase pedestrian safety and parking. 5. The stubbing off of vehicular traffic west of Admiral Way on Dayton Street to prevent congestion at the entrance to our new fishing pier. 6. The development of Union Oil Park including parking and circulation improvements, into a family type situation which will discourage undesired uses. JJ/le 0 STREET FILE September 12, 1978 MEMO TO: Harve H. Harrison Mayor FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: PUBLIC RIGHT=OF-WAY 0 At the request of kr. Kauffmari) the Engineering Division researched existing 14rc r--i-g'(zt-of-way deeds. The Plat of.. Meadowdale Beach dedicated 75th Avenue West from 162nd Street S.W. to North Meadowdale Road as part of the Plat dedication in 1904. Accordingly, the section of right-of-way in question is publicly owned. We are working with the City Attorney's office and the Community Development Department on a trade of rights -of -way, vacating 75th Avenue West (as requested) in exchange for the right-of-way for the actual location of 75th Place West. Mr. Kauffman has been informed of this action and concurs. WJN:LRL:rm CITY OF E D M 0 N D S TO: \ ? J Q z LU a o SUSPENSE DATE: MAYOR As We Discussed Investigate and report Take Appropriate Action Prepare Letter/Memo for My Signature Mayor's Signature Previously. Ref'd Status of Action? For your Information Note & File Return to: MAYOR'S ADMIN. ASS?. CHIEF of POLICE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUN. DEVELOP. DIR. FINANCE DIRECTOR FIRE CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COMMENTS: FROM: L DATE: (3/77) CITY OF E'uMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: TREET FILEo LU z o SUSPENSE DATE: DIRECTOR Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare letter/memo for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY CITY ENGINEER BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPT. EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPT. STREET DIVISION SUPT. TREATMENT PLANT SUPT. WATER/SEWER SUPT. COMMENTS: 1311 L _ L L S r79 - 4 7- I19 04 Ac-c-ok%AitJ Tb 7'E PL - FROM: ' DATE: '!j (3 /771 Hon. Harvey Harrison Mayor, City of Edmonds 250 - 5th North Edmonds WA 98020 Dear Sir: RECEIVED AUG 2 2 1978 Executive Offices Mr. Stanley R. Kauffmann Laebugten Marina, Inc. 16111 76th Place West Edmonds WA 98020 August 18, 1978 RECEIVED AUG 2 8 1978 Public Vvums Dept. Per our phone conversation, please find enclosed the map with the road in question marked in red. Since this road has not been dedicated we would like it to be closed to traffic. We would appreciate your support in this matter. Thankyou. SK/dj Enc. 0 Sincerely yours, 4aneley . Kauffman, Presi nt, Laebugten Marina, Inc. �/2 1/0 .•coif - - '�•� , ; :� N ' � � ,, - — / 7 • ... 1 � i'1 .t. , 1. ••) t r f' 7 7�5� +��1. .� C 2 • l:R -• I ), L/. �J n , 5 s e- r ,r NB,9 Kle- tt•�?ryy Cy, �. s' 0 �. 'cf typ. i'� / ,�a� -�+ +. ;y.- ,1• g�, i60�%pi..• `) �i' e_/ _�, ♦ g•.t ♦V,� ��}.t, 11a J��Y.Y -. <; `'� yV a v t j f1 j +1.2: • 1 ..�. rl llyh sn' •i' �"—�•► A +r Y I _ {a`• fK��• �♦ r �, ,i, 1;4 ' �t i�' / 41. � `. tt �1 t LY'' � �5•. � � � •t j{r ;� sl + ,. , 'a a ,l � 7?ra:•i���=ter t '' f s�'. i a.tt i.. `' ` ' ♦ �, . - .., trr,.. � '� r ��j -•�, u 1 d . �' ' J 4cr �� 5 � � it _ .� t 1' ;, ; ��. .. ./ d � n i P d �• s t 1'dC �tX ,st,s {�.:gb+•�mlti�4 .al btl � t P_ .r'C <<. QPr- ;:o , :.♦ ' � t f Ali N � ; YP.-�yi �<` 4r -•� •:'k,`:, . ! .!''� r t° t rn r ,l. i� ' ,. d, 1.� `� V��' t r ,,% _.d �`� /1 •� r'�••��� r r r d _{• c� �. • :� :�"5 0.'' •, 1, ''\ ., � Sri t 4,N � •`:�. .a P _4. e y �.• i � 1. � �{� ` � r+ � r-'s� 1„ 7 rit t � �_.,,C.t - -' y,.•'•��\, _ r .-,� A� ;�0�� j- ,V/L •,i y,S r- �-�� -t ii ,�1. p�ft ��.:a .y. � w �♦\ y!. 1 tr �. :r • 1 �., , t:. � e y�i 1 sl, ,.<: i.Mr .. .5 •�'•cs".J � _ .'i'.I? cF+`">s '. - ai ,ti. 4 f 4' , (/ r'�LC STREET FILE July 24, 1978 MEMO TO: Fred Herzberg City Engineer FROM: John LaTiurelle, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: CONTRACT REZONE The attached rezone from RS-20 to CR-CW(Contract Rezone, Commercial Waterfront) was approved May 23rd. Please have the appropriate changes made on the Official Zoning Map and Official Street Map. (See Quit Claim Deed). NC/mt Attachments RFCFIVFD JUL 25 1978 Public j;o";c, ORDINANCE NO. 1996, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS/ WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, BY CHANGING'THE'ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN SAID CITY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 20,000 " . SQUARE.FEET (RS-20) TO WATERFRONT COMMERCIAL (CW) PURSUANT TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 592, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT AND COVENANTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution - No. 592, a public hearing was called by the City Council of the City of Edmonds, and at the conclusion of.said hearing the City Council having determined as follows: 1. That the proposed zoning change conforms with the intent of the comprehensive plan; i 2. That the proposed zoning change bears a reasonable relationship to the existing land uses and zoning ;of surrounding and nearby properties; 3. That the proposed zoning .will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; 4. That the subject property is suited for the purpose for which it is proposed to be zoned; 5. That the proposed use of the property with.the restrictions imposed in the concomitant agreement is compatible with- the surrounding properties; 6. That.there are no significant adverse environmental. impacts to the surrounding properties either within or without the jurisdiction of the City of Edmonds, which will be directly affected by the proposed, use of the property as a result of the certain additional limitations. imposed by contract tendered by the owner.to the City, now, therefore,_ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: I Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Edmonds, Washington, be and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the following described property from single family residence, :20,000 square feet (RS-.20) to Commercial .Waterfront (CW) , all situate in the City of Edmonds,.Snohomish County, Washington, and legally described as follows: "Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of.Snohomish.County, Washington. Section 2. The Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works.are hereby authorized and directed to effectuate the necessary amendments to the Official Zoning Map of the City, pursuant to this ordinance. Section 3. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Clerk to attest, that certain document entitled "Contract Rezone Agreement and Covenant" ,consisting of 7_ typewritten pages and a site plan relating to the above described property and attached thereto, which was executed by the owners of said property on the c,<3"dday of. 3d110 Z1 1978, and tendered to the City. The City Clerk is f; - 2 - --- - further directed to record said contract rezone agreement and covenant with the Snohomish County Auditor as a.covenant running with the land. The cost of recordation shall be . paid by the owners. The City Clerk is further authorized to record with the Snohomish County Auditor a Quit.Claim.Deed covering a portion of the above described.property and executed by the owners on April 14,.1978. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication by posting'. as provided by law. APPROVED: /s/ H. H. Harrison MAYOR, H. H. Harrison ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: /s/ Irene Varney Moran I CITY CLERK, Irene Varney Moran ! APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFIC"F THE CITY ATTORNEY l/ 4 . FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: May 15, 1978 PASSED BY THE -CITY COUNCIL: May 23, 1978 POSTED: May 241978 EFFECTIVE DATE,: -'I- NORTHJeole I �.:• . uJIONgC IAN� GROUP FO , INc. . 19707 44th Avenue weft Lynm000d, WahMgtm PW36 .. 200 7754S81 IV�v-wvme PIAw...* YAM.*N/► , O ' ev: e4. % r Ire LOT /a,, BL0l1f ♦S9, PLAT OF MI-140040,4Z25 DE'AC.H, /O/..�, JIY011044IJ11 C0U1Y1"Y, GYASH/N0701Y 1OZ 07 /'LAN S.R. KAUFMAN 16HI 161h Place Wes f .7, ilk, �- ao; og 41. .10 a, 99 XA,. 44 .0/ n"I A _x, JL 4 ` - } �0'y _� _ r Y',1;� •! - ti F ri�c ] :9` - ti� Owl IVA Vol jAOC) jN IS aw jg,;O'j {AOO,90 IA. s j?O Iwo OS7 -770 94 cil Y.Of� 66[nnUnily A is 7,418 rr7 . . . . . . . . . . • CITY CLERK !C•eic Center. •" Edmonds, -Washington QUIT CLAIM DEED c�=•t J L,J 0 �i THE GRANTORS, STANLEY KAUFFMANN,and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, his wife, K. EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD, WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD and NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD, for and in consideration of mutual benefits to be derived convey and quit claim to'the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON the following described real estate, situate in Snohomish County, State of Washington, -including any interest therein which Grantors may hereafter acquire: That portion of Lot 10, Block 59, in the Plat of" Meadowd'ale Beach as recorded in Volume 5, of • Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: t-- Beginning at the northeast corner of said -Lot; thence southerly,along the east line of said Lot a distance 60 feet to the southeast corner of said r' =T Lot; thence, westerly along the south line of said ,Lot,.38 feet; thence, northerly on a straight line to its intersection with the north line of said :r Lot said intersection being 33 feet west.of the '- ';northeast corner of said Lot; thence, easterly rn Yt� LL;along the north line of said Lot, 33 feet to the true point of beginning. • DATED this 1i� _ day of 1978. GRANTORS Z6 - Stanley Kauf fmann ; ! �% ;Daphne ,Kauf fman t K. Edmunds Northfield William 0. Northfield Nancy Irene Northfield, REQU R - D MAY 2 a 1978 KIRKE VETS, S of omish CoMy Treasurer Deputy 7 05 24 0 2 / 'col . °L = I - ;;0!. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH On this day personally appeared before me STANLEY KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, his wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their.free and voluntary act and deed, for theuses dnd.P,qgP.,ues therein mentioned. un der my hand and off' ial seal s L,4.c 1978. -..4PUBLIC,E - J, No lin.and for the S t of Washington, residing a STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. COUNTY OF -SNGHGM-l-&H On this day personally appeared before me K. EDM!44,PS NORTHFIELD, to me known to be the individual described Pho executed the within and foregoing, instrument, and ..,/.--VXno%41Iedged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary —'rNa6t','an,d.djee6), for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. 4 CDT! under my hand and official seal .th is de� f .1978. .... ......... Lary Public in and f 01: the �tate of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASIIZVCTON IM"L .1 rj C fa 1) #1 ss. COUNTY OF SbIeHOX-1--3H On this day personally appeared before me WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD,.to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same.as his free and voluntary act and deed, for-t es and purposes therein mentioned. Give w erm.-,hand and official seal this ' day of 1978. -1805240211 ,No Publicn and for the .5tate of 14asl. h residing at 4-741 SE -2- =CV STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared.before me NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and, voluntary act and deed, for.the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal thisg 1978. 11,0 TA 01 BlI0 - c) - Notary. Public in and for the :.f Z State _of Washington, residing a at W • OSTREET FILE • 0 THE WORD "REDUCE" TO "MODIFY" AND THE WORD "BELOW" TO "FROM." MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Robert Driscoll of 514 Holly Dr. was present to protest the parking plan for a 12-unit condominium to be built on Holly Dr. He had attended a variance hearing on the proposal and was not opposed to the variance, but was opposed to the parking proposed to be perpendicular to Holly Dr. He was advised this would go before the ADB on June 7 and if he was not satisfied with the ADB decision he could file a written appeal of that decision with the Planning Department within 10 days, and that would. bring it to the Council. He was also advised to visit the Planning Department in the meantime to be sure he was up-to-date on what was happening with regard to this matter. PROGRESS REPORT FROH LIBERTY TV CABLE, INC. Ted Lovett, Manager of Liberty TV Cable, reported that at the beginning of the construction program on March 23, 1978 the number of homes -yet to be served in Edmonds was 458, and as of May 18, 1978 the balance was down to 271. He did not feel they would have any trouble meeting their construction deadline. Mayor..Harrison announced that there would be an Executive Session following this meeting to -review a labor agreement and the fishing pier parking lot acquisition. HEARING ON P.C. RESOLUTION 592, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT REZONE FROM -FRS-20 TO CW ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF 162ND. 1-1. AND 75TH PL. W. (KAUFFMAN) (R-2-77) Assistant City Planner Noelle Charleson showed the location of this property and �. showed slides of the site and surrounding area. The applicant had a 1,000 gal. fuel tank on his dock and had been asked to move it onto ground because of fire hazard. He proposed to bury a 5,000 gal. fuel tank on this site, which would give him more fuel to service his increased boat capacity. In return for his requested rezone he proposed that no future structures would be built on the property. The zoning in the immediate area is RS-20, with CW on the waterfront. After this proposal had been approved by the Planning Commission the applicant was asked by the Staff to have the property surveyed. The survey revealed that 75th P1. W. is not in the right-o,f-way, but on Mr. Kauffmann's property, and he has subsequently dedicated that to the City in order that the roadway will be in the right-of-way. Slides shown of the area reflected the topography, the location of the tank, and the size of the tank. Ms. Charleson noted that burying of the tank will guarantee no construction over it, open space in that area, and no view obstruction to properties east of the site. She reviewed the rezone criteria. Regarding conformity with the Policy Plan, she referred to page 37 which speaks to commercial development and specifically to paragraph A.5. which states that commercial developments should be carefully located and designed to eliminate or minimize the adverse impacts of heavy traffic volume and other related problems on surrounding land uses. She noted that the fuel tank, itself, will not generate traffic except for a fuel truck filling it occasionally, and that truck will come less frequently because of the larger tank. It will allow for more boat traffic, however, because of the availability of fuel. She said there will be no impact on water quality. The tank will be buried and will be vented, and pipes will run under the railraod tracks to connect with the wharf. In terms of soils and topography the Policy Plan indicates the City should control future development that will affect natural slopes. The applicant had agreed that future owners could not build on the property, insuring open space, topography, and views of people east of the site. Ms. Charleson felt the proposal conformed to the Policy Plan. With regard to existing land uses and zoning of nearby property, she noted that the properties to the north are undeveloped and this proposal will keep this site undeveloped and will not alter the character of the neighborhood substantially. She felt it made sense to rezone this CW which has a direct relationship to the wharf across the railroad tracks. The gain the public will get will be the permanent open space and a safer facility.. Regarding EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - May 23, 1978 MOTION: MOTION MOTION: the suitability of the property for the purpose for which it was being zoned, _ • Ms. Charleson felt it was obvious from her reasons already stated that it was, suitable. She felt this proposal would meet the policies of the City, would maintain the site in its natural state, and would not cause any significant negative environmental impacts. She recommended approval. The public portion of the hearing was opened, no one wished to speak, and the public portion was closed. Councilman Nordquist said he felt very -comfortable with the proposal, but he did have two concerns. He was concerned about the loading equipment on the tank site and asked if it could be fenced. Mr. Kauffmann responded that a fence would not deter people. He said he would try to conceal.it when it is� filled and that the blackberry bushes will be spread back over the fill area. Also, it will be secured with electrical safety devices. He said the Fire Chief and installer have come up with a lock device.. Councilman Nordquist then asked whether the tank could remain if the usage on the dock should change. Ile was advised by the City Attorney that there would have to be a rezone process. COUNCILMAN HERB THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 1996, PURSUANT TO P.C. RESOLUTION 592, ACCEPTING THE CONTRACT REZONE AND THE QUIT CLAIM DEED AS PROPOSED, BECAUSE THE PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE TO CW IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE POLICY PLAN IN THAT IT WOULD PRESERVE VIEWS AND OPEN SPACE; THE RELATION- SHIP OF THE PROPOSAL TO THE NEARBY PROPERTIES WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL; THE WHARF HAS CHANGED AND EXPANDED NECESSITATING MOVING THE FUEL TANK; THE PUBLIC 14OULD GAIN IN THE SAFETY ADVANTAGES AND SPACE PRESERVATION; THE VALUES OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED ACCORDING TO THE TESTIMONY; AND THE SITE IS SUIT- ABLE FORTHE PROPOSED USE. FURTHER, THAT THE MAYOR BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE CONTRACT REZONE AGREEMENT.. MOTION CARRIED. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO PLACE UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF 162ND W. AND 75TH PL. W. (KAUFFMANN) (SM-2-77)__. Ms.. Charleson indicated that the Shorelines Management Act requires that any proposal of this nature within 200' of the waterfront requires a Shorelines • Management Substantial Development Permit. The proposal must meet the Shorelines Master Plan which calls for shoreline uses to be located near the waterfront. Because this tank is a shoreline dependent use, she said priority .should be given to locating the tank where proposed. She said the potential adverse effects of commercial and industrial development on the environment should be prevented, and in this case the effects probably will be beneficial, rather than adverse, because of reducing the fire hazard. In terms of the chemical or fuel handling and the storage facilities, she said they should be inspected and approved by the City of Edmonds, and safe handling shall be the responsibility of the owner who shall be required to provide a safe means of handling spills or accidental dis- charges. COUNCILMAN 14ORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, TO APPROVE THE PERMIT TO PLACE AN UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK ON THE NORTHWEST COR14ER OF 162ND. W. AND 75TH PL. W. MOTION CARRIED. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND/OR CONTRACTS Administrative Services Director Lila Crosby explained that the City participates with state and federal agencies in programs to provide work experience to people, usually in the.clerical and general labor areas. Although these programs do not require a financial obligation from the City, there are certain stipulations which require agreements and/or contracts.. To eliminate routing each agreement through the Council, Mrs. Crosby suggested that the Council give the Mayor authorization to execute such agreements. She had coordinated this suggestion with the City Attorney. Councilman Nordquist commented that the Council would not be aware of what is happening on the work force. City Attorney John Wallace said the purpose of the request was to eliminate going to the Council time after time as each program changes its rules, sometimes from month to month. He said that often there is less than 30 days in which to use the potential employees, and this would eliminate each individual contract having to to to the Council. COUNCILMAN CARNS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NAUGHTEN, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS WITH FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES FOR THE VARIOUS • WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS. MOTION CARRIED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - May 23, 1978 a0 STREET FILE '0* MEMO TO: FROM: May 17, 1978 Harve H. Harrison Mayor John A. LaTourelle, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO PLACE UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF 162ND AVENUE WEST AND 5TH PLACE WEST KAUFFMAN SM-2-77 The applicant is Stanley Kauffman. This item was heard before the Planning Commission on July 27, 1977. The minutes of that meeting, and the application, are attached for your review. The Community Development Department recommends that the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to place an underground fuel tank on the northwest corner of 162nd Avenue West and 75th Place West be approved. le Attachments ,J D -C, 4/� See - File r7o.Siffl-3-i�r/ Fee: Date Filed:JjCQ -�.y i • APPLICATION FOR s SHORELINE cIANAGENENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOP -.E;TT PERMIT TO THE APPLICANT: This is an arplicaticn for a substantial development - permit and is authorized by the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. It is suggested that you check with the appropriate local, state, or feder- al officials to determine whether your project falls within any other permit systems, since a permit under the Shoreline ?•;anagement Act will not excuse the applicant from compliance with any other local, state or federal ordinances, regulations or statutes applicable to the project. 1. Name of applicant 2. Mailing addressZoIll 3. Relation of applicant to property: Owner �'Weled. Lessee_ ° Contract ourchasPr,L;..- Z Other (specify) — 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: 5. General location of proposed project (give stre^t address; if known, city or town, and county; others:is-: give distance and direction to nearest town): 6. Legal description of property: R 7. fame of ac 4te a ea or tre Hands : 8. Current useoperty with eting improvements: 0 9. Describe proposed project:_�� 6 10. Nature of the shoreline. (Describe type, such as beach, bank or dike; ..material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bolkhe,adi^.o, 1: a!1y.1 11. Project diagrams: draw all maps to scale, clearly indicating scale on lower.right corner of the map. Attach all maps to application. (a) SITE PLAN MAP. Include on map- (1) Site ::oundary and dimensions in vicinity of project. (2) Land contours using 5-foot intervals or cross sections. If project includes grading, filling, or other altera- tion of contours, then either: (i) indicate existing and proposed contours and items (3) through (8) below; OR (ii) Provide two cross sections, one sho,.aing existing ground elevations and height of structures, the second sho:aing proposed ground elevations and height of proposed structures, with both showing (4) below. (3) Size and location of existing improvements which will be retained. (4) Ordinary high -grater mark. (S) Size and location of proposed structures. (6) M axim_::n height of proposed structures above existing grade .,level. (7) State type and amount of proposed fill. (8) Propcs=cd utill.t.ics. (b) VICIHI'['Y i;:;?. Indicate relation of site to adjacent lands and the uses to 'which they are put for at least rt00 feet in all direc- tions from the proj^_ct site. l� am the above-nam?d ap lira^t i a Pe :ni. t t conk i;u 't a r;uus t. intial development pursuant to the Shore] e :'.an.as; m^_nt Act 1971, rind hcreb,__tate that the foregoing; •scat•,"^_n, , ans,•:er>, and .n. z2ma*icin arc, in all respects, true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. (� gna re) EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION July 27, 1977 The regular meeting of the Edmonds Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Larry Naughten at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. Chairman Naughten welcomed those present and explained the procedure of the meeting. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Larry Naughten Keith LaBelle Noelle Charleson, Asst. City Planner John McGibbon Valina Walker Dick Allen, Asst. City Engineer Ray Sittauer. C. Richard Goodhope John Wallace, City Attorney Laura Hall Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Fred Ross Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk Richard Dickson' Tom Carns, Ex officio APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of July 13, 1977 had been posted, mailed, and distributed. COMMISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COtflISSIONER McGIBBON, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 13, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT FROM COUNCILMAN TOM CARNS Councilman,Carns reported that the City Council had approved the final plat of Brockman Park at last week's meeting. The Council also approved the Planning Com- mission Resolutions establishing regulations governing public and institutional land Uses in RS districts and providing for direct review of short subdivision applications. by the Planning Commission when so requested by the Planning Staff. At the July 26 meeting the Council overrode the Planning Commission recommendation not to reduce the right -of -Tray adjacent to Brookacres. The Council had previously stated its position regarding the saving of the trees at this location, and reducing the right- of-way placed the trees on the Brookacres site without danger of removal for any future road expansion. The Council approved the Planning Commission Resolution reducing the right-of-way on 84th 0. bet,tiveen 200th and.202nd S.W. Councilman Carns noted that the Council, on August 2,.,will hear the resolution eliminating the bonus density allowance in RML and RMH zones and the Patrick Hagan rezone appeal. AGENDA SM-2-77 STANLEY R. KAUFFMIANN -Shoreline for an underground 5,000 Callon and 75th Ave. W. Management Substantial Development Permit fuel storage facility at 162nd St. S.W. Ms.. Charleson explained that any time new development is proposed, either under or above ground, within 200' of the waterfront and the value of the development exceeds $1,000, this permit is required. She showed the location of the site on a vicinity sketch and noted that zoning is RS-20 to the north, east, and south, and CW to the west. She showed slides of the site and noted that it is vacant. She said if the fuel tank is located where proposed it will reduce the fire hazard created by having a fuel tank on the dock. She.sa.id there would be no adverse environmental impact, and she recommended approval, subject to the conditions of the contract rezone of the property and subject to removal of the existing tank on the wharf. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Stanley R. Kauffmann was present and said the smaller tank will be removed from the wharf as soon as the proposed one is installed. Fred Kefgin who stated he lives at the end of 75th inquired if anything else would be built on the site. He was advised it would not and that this had been covered previously at the contract rezone hearing. The public portion was then closed. COMMISSIONER McGIBBON MOVED, SECONDED BY COM- MISSIONER HALL, TO APPROVE SM-2-77, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT REZONE AND RECO�UIENDATIONS OF THE STAFF. MOTION CARRIED. PRD-3-77 PARKSIDE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Planned Residential Development - 13 dwelling units on N. Meadowdale.Rd. near 68th Ave. W. and 164th St. S.W. Ms. Charleson said this was a preliminary review to be followed at a later date by the design review. The site is in north Edmonds and is bounded on the west by Meadowdale Rd. The site is heavily wooded and slopes substantially to the Crest: There are two cul-de-sacs which are located on .flat knolls with a steep ravine between them. The area is large enough for 25 building lots, but 13 are proposed. Zoning is RS-20 to the north, south, and east, and RS-12 to the west. She showed the location on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map and showed slides of the site.. She said each owner will own 1/13 of the common open space, thereby preserving most of the vegetation on the site. A proposal was submitted in 1975 for this site which was for approximately 30 units but that proposal was not developed. Ms. Charleson noted that there are no interior setback require- ments in a PRO, but each unit will be at least 25' from another and the units will be detached. One of the requirements the Planning Department will make will be that a soils engineer give a soils report on the existing conditions there because there have been slide conditions in the area. Ms. Charleson noted that the applicant will be requesting a 20' paved street, rather than the'required 24'. She said the developed areas and the road equal approximately 50l of the site, leaving 50%' open space (25% open space is required). A crushed rock walk is required on 68th and two fire hydrants are required. Connection to sanitary sewers will be required. The applicant proposed that the entire site drain into a detention pond. his. Charleson said no environmental findings could be made until there is more information on the soil condition and on drainage. She recommended approval on a preliminary basis. Chairman Naughten noted that there should be some safety measures taken if the detention pond is very large. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Jerry Krell of Kegel & Associates, the project designer, said the detention area would be only for excessive storm water and that they generally create such areas no deeper than 18"-24" so as not to create a danger or an attractive nuisance. He said the detention area generally would be dry, except during heavy rains. Regarding a crushed rock walkway, he said he would not want to do a lot of grading or removal of trees for a walkway. Assistant City Engineer Dick Allen remarked that the gravel walkway would be a minimum disturbance of the site. Fred Kefgin noted that on the Westmont View plat, across from this site, there is also a holding pond and exposed aluminum piping. He said he hoped that kind of piping would not be installed on this site. He inquired whether all the houses would be high enough to drain to 63th, and Mr. Allen responded that they would not but they could be pumped up. Mr. Krell then said that any progress on this development will be hampered by the sewer requirement. His , proposal was to service each lot individually with septic tanks in order to avoid the piping, cutting, clearing, and costs of providing sewers. Mr. Allen said his recommendation would be denial on that basis, that sewers are a City requirement and that the only unusual requirement here was the necessary agreement between the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood for sewers. Ile added that the Health Department had already issued letters to the City recommending no more septic tanks in this area. Fred Kefgin called attention to the fact that there were tree cutting restrictions on the development across from this but three lots were EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 - July 27, 1977 MEMO TO: FROM: '60 STREET FILE '010 May 15, 1978 Harve H. Harrison Mayor John A. LaTourelle, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: HEARING ON P.C. RESOLUTION 592 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT REZONE FROM RS-20 TO CW ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF 162ND AVENUE WEST AND 75TH PLACE WEST KAUFFMAN R-2-77 The applicant is Stanley Kauffman. The rezone was heard before the Planning Commission'on May 25, 1977 and June 8, 1977. The minutes of those meetings are attached. The Ordinance draft, prepared by the City Attorney, and a copy of the Contract and Quit Claim Deed, are attached for your review. The Community Development Department recommends that the Ordinance upholding Planning Commission Resolution #592 be passed. le Attachments W PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.592 A RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS RECOM- MENDING APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO CONTRACT REZONE FROM RS-20 TO CW THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 162ND AVENUE WEST AND 75TH PLACE WEST AS SET FORTH IN FILE #R-2-77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Edmonds, pursuant to proper notice and publication, held a public hearing on a proposal to amend the Official Zoning Map to contract rezone from RS-20 to CW the northwest corner of 162nd Avenue West and 75th Place West; and WHEREAS, the existing 1,000 gallon fuel tank on the Laebugten Wharf poses a fire safety threat to the Wharf users as well as the surrounding community; and WHEREAS, the rezone site would provide a safe and convenient location for a fuel storage tank for Laebugten Wharf; and WHEREAS, the conditions offered by the applicant in the contract will minimize adverse impacts from the proposed rezone and will make the proposal compatible with the surrounding single.family uses; and WHEREAS, there is a finding of no significant adverse environmental impact on the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, said amendment is necessary to promote the public health, safety.and general welfare; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends and forwards to the City Council of said City., that the proposed amendment to.the Official Zoning Map as set forth in Exhibit "A", "B" and "C" attached hereto, be approved. DATED this a6 day of April, 1978.__ FILE: R-2-77 HEARING: 5/25/77 & 6/8/77 INITIATED BY: Kauffma n ector L nos Planning Commission Community Development d M00 001/017 o Foe/ Tonk 10 LOco/ion file aa 16217d —4vel7ue Merl SCO%: I� I A-4 `4, , ` Ili 1. N. n rl \4E'CISiC�� I . 4L LAND• /?1GROUP FOUR Inc. 19707 44th Avenue West Sn'Oi�'U,1=9/J'// UUU,ti'T); !9!-Sri/�ti'GTU/Y. P,C. RES. #592 EXHIBIT "A" Lynnwood, Washington 98036 . 200 7754581 Ali■V[11M• ■.....YAMAGSU M1l1 • /U �' iJ DRAWN BPAk'�Y/i�,ti:'i:rh,��:• (HICYID IY A►►ROVID IT 1OL07 /'LAN S. 8. AWIVINAN l6/// 761h 1%ce Ales f CON'.PxZr1C'T R-:'LONL•' AGPd-J MEigT AND CO m1T AGR%EMENT AND COVEPdANT between STANLEY I AUFFMANN and' DAPIME KAUFF."MIR-1, his wife, K. E'DMUNDS NORTHFIELD _ II, WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD and NANCY IRENE 'NORTH —FIELD T;� 1'': , hereafter jointly and seveiially referred to as "O%,iners," and the.CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation. WHEREAS, Owners are the owners of real property situate in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows: Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats,'page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Emonds for a Contract Rezone from Single -Family Residence-- 20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CW) for the purpose of installing a gasoline -fuel storage tank capable of storing.5,000 gallons, and MHEREAS, the Owners have offered to tender to the City of Edmonds this Agreement and Covenant respecting liiri.itations on the use of the property, and WHI✓P.EAS, the covenants and acTreements herein are intended to constitute the basis for the rezone sit forth above and are intended to be effective from the effective date of said rezone, and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property will have a substantial relation to the people, land and resources, Health, welfare, safety and morals of the citizens of the City of Edmonds, and the Owners recognize the need for the control, cooperation and securing the uroper dr;vr'l.onTert. of the property to be compatible with the surrounding uses, NOTrJ, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 1. The property which is the SLIbjeCt of this Agreement is legally described as follows: Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Mteadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington. 2. '!'his Agreement is tendered to the City of Edmonds by the Oc.7ners, and said Agreement is hereby accepted Page one by the City of EdmonO,..'_ All parties agree that it is applicable to the parties to this Agreement, their heirs, successors, assigns a.nd future o;•mers or users of the subject property, both as to duties and, benefits. The Owners agree that this Agreement will be specifically enforceable in equity by the City of Edmonds. 3. The City of Edmonds is under no obligation to issue to Owners, their successors or.assigns, building or other permits for improvements or. structures on.the subject property, unless such improvements comply substantially with the site plan attached hereto, with the terms of this Agreement and with applicable ordinances at the time of application for said permits. 4. This Agreement and each part of it shall be con- sidered a covenant running with the land described in this Agreement and shall be binding upon the Owners; their successors and assigns, and -shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the Grantor --Grantee Index, with the'Own ers being listed as Grantors and the City of Edmonds, as Grantee, all the costs of. such recording shall be paid by the Owners. Payment of said costs shall be a condition precedent to exercising any rights under the terms of this Agreement. 5. This Agreement and Covenant is conditioned upon said legally described property being rezoned from Single -Family Residence--20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CW) , 6. Owners and their. successors or assigns shall be limited in the use and development of the above - described property to the installation of one 5,000-gallon gasoline -fuel storage facility, subject to the following additional limitations: a. Said fuel -tank facility shall be entirely buried underground, except for necessary venting and filling tubes. b. Owners shall restore the surface of the subject property to the contours as now exist. C. No permanent above -ground structure shall be .installed on the subject property, except for necessary venting and filling tubes of the fuel --storage tank. Page two d• Enid fuel. tank steal ]. be lnotit-o( I oy on prpert, L, a r, sett, I-, forth rth on the to ptt.-irl-ind hereto, and incorpo' rnted 11 + *11; ref n Y, n Y� r, n % the p1 nn in full % .7- Owners agree to dedicate a strip of land on the '.?Tg -sisterly )101 exi -,tinr, rend portion of the property to tho N.LY of Fdmonds for purpooc.s. Thee oc ion or I —i t ci i. o -)n nsiid 01( ,,1 f, 1 in mnr(� p.-irt. i :�ul arly describod oil the site elan '111 n t. t n 1 d 110. r P to. The 0 w n t-, r s a.q r that in Lhe event it. is Tin cc s sary L."' I — ­Q,� ­i , *'111 For the City ()I* Edmonds to bring InC,, L '-I c t.l n to j i .n enforce the nrovisonn of this Ar�rorrient, the: ` ti01.1nern will pny costs, rensonalbo. rit.tn"ney's re s 14N and rcqsonq!bl(-. exocrt. witne..r�- rco.­ deterlrli.no.d�­ t- b y t h c (.t o I I r t. in t, C event; . the (7 i t,,/, of ',E ('I mn. 1 i s I0. 0 io IN on this ti ISUCCIes-:11)1]. Pn the rtuit. Owners f-Ohall Curn1sli,. at their -,olo cxnense, suit- able title. rt�port for the subject propprty. Ar, 0'.., 1-1 o I's n L t.,hp i r s 01 e expense sfi j,,).l I in E, r m ,.I n c, n t y re move thc! (!xistinr- fuel. tnnk on the Lnobtqrt.en Fishing 1.4 h R -I-, f• Thereafter no other fuel nitornfLan'A­ shall b-:' nlacr�dj on the gt n'rl 11 V �,J har r P (,,!,I o v,,) I o f -J,,j i d f u r! I ti nl,� :-.; hi 11. 1) o f o c t c d an -,non -I:-, possible rift -or inst,'Illntion of L hi? 5,000- g,3 n fuel storage f q c i. I i t to b o n t e d on the subject property. No appli iration shall he ir,,qdE, by Owners or their succerl , sors or assigns 'to nmend this Agreement for a period of two years from the date or this Agreement._ Thereafter, either. Owners or th6: i r -1 11 (, o e ss or 3 or A. Ar, assigns or the City of Edmonds may, upon ap plication .r i 11 o d in t h e s n m r., manner n s n re o n f- a -) p 1, c, a t i. o n A 'r.1pp y to ainf-,nd ni-' terminate the pt,nvisions and covennnt., of this Agreement or to ^,hnnge the zoning of subject: property. Said applicatiorl to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as nny othel- applica- tion for a rezone of property. `;Lich action + by the City of Edmonds shall. not, release the Owners or their successors or assigns from the obligations duties assiimed under this Agreement. . WITNESS WHEREOF the prirtjer, have executed this Agreement ___a 3 day of 1978 ATTEST: City Clerk, Irene Varney Moran Mayor, H. H. Harrison OWNZ E RS,: ;Stariley auff' ann ` i i U D�phne K of ffian- is —wife----- ...... .-_ .... _..... K. Edmunds North iel William o. Noithfi d Nancy Irebe Northfield Page four STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of Snohomish ) On this day of 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared H. H. HARRISON and IRENE VARNEY MORAN, to me known to be the Mayor and the City Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF . EDMONDS, the municipal corporation that executed the fore- going instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to ;be the free and voluntary act and deed of ,said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on .oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of SNv46Mi&* On this oZ SRO day of JAN vp4 j �1978, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared STANLEY KAUFFMANN.and DAPHNE KAUFFMAN, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that.they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the.uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and offici s;2 thie d andl1ear last above written. �- Page five Mr STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of 11ibnp ) On this /, day of, '--,E,P, 1977, before me, .the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared K. EDMINDS ,NORTHVIELDc* �, to me known. to be the individual descftibed in and who executed) the within and foregoing i strument.and acknowledged that signed the same .as ,.� ...; free and voluntary, act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and _near last above written. NOTA�Y PUBLIC i and for the Sta,ajze of: Nashingto , __ residing at ss County of bluUrt3 On this 1`'j day of % ,'1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publ c in and :for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn perisona� y appeared. WIL.LIAM O. NORTHFIELD /l%/.(�4�1�� �� !' OMEN' �� , to me known to be the individual describedlin and who executed the within andforegoing instrument and acknowledged that signed the same as , • free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTP PUBLIC and for the State of n, residing at ` Page six STATE OF WASHINGTON ss County of On this day of 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publi'6 in and fortheState of Washington, duly commission.d and s o eared rn, persona a p NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD to me known to be,the individual described in and who executed the within and 'foregoing instrument and acknowledged.,----, /6. that signed the same as " I- . -- - free and volunta-r-y act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day :and last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State ;of--* Washing ton, -residing Page seven QUIT CLAIM DEED THE GRANTORS, STANLEY KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, his wife, K. EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD, WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD and NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD, for and in consideration of mutual benefits to be derived convey and quit claim to the CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON the following. -described real estate, situate in Snohomish County, State of Washington, including any interest therein which Grantors may hereafter acquire: That portion of Lot 10, Block 59, in the Plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in Volume 5, of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot, thence southerly along the east line of said Lot a distance 60 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot; thence, westerly along the south line.of said Lot,' 38 feet; thence, northerly on a straight line to its intersection with the north line of said Lot said intersection being 33 feet west of the northeast corner of said Lot; thence, easterly along the north line of said Lot, 33 feet to the true point of beginning. DATED this day of C/L,/�d 1978. GRANTORS ( i� Stanley/Kauffmann f f' :Daphne ;Kauffman err �• s. K. Edmunds Northfield William 0. Northfield Nancy Irene Northfield P.C. RES. #592 EXHIBIT "C" STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared before me STANLEY KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, his wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and off' ial seal 's day'of 1978.- No y lid In and for the S t of Washington, residing a STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SN$F3-LH ) On this day personally appeared before me K. EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this day of 1978. J-41, 1,F6tary Public in and fo'r the ;_,state of Washi-ngton, residing at STATE OF Wksi�'?'QN ) i..«t1 r•':!:r;tr\ t ) ss. COUNTY OF SNGHeM1:S.H ) On this day personally appeared before me WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD, to me known to be the individual described in, and who executed the within and foregoing instrument,.and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein menti-oned. Given nder my hand and official seal this �{ day of 1978. No Public 'n and for the tate of W=t3iii#€fl� residing STATE OF WASHINGTON ) + ) ss. COUNTY ,OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day personally appeared before me NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ' Given under my hand and official seal this •.day of%�. ' �;', , 1978. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at-;-�- -3- Vw EDMONDS PLANNING COMMISSION June 8, 1977 'The regular meeting of the Edmonds Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Larry Naughten at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. Chairman Naughten welcomed those present and explained the procedure of . the meeting.. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Larry Naughten y C. Richard Goodhope Noelle Charleson, Asst. City Planner Fred Ross Ray Sittauer Harry Whitcutt, Building Official John McGibbon Dick Allen, Asst. City Engineer Keith LaBelle Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Laura Hall Carolyn Anderson, Recording Secry. Valina Walker Richard Dickson Tom Carns, Ex offici;o F APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of May 25, 1977 had been posted, mailed, and distributed. COMMISSIONER ROSS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER McGIBBON, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 25, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. At the request of Chairman Naughten, Councilman Tom Carns gave a report of the City Council meetings from May 10 through June 7, 1977. CORRESPONDENCE Chairman Naughten acknowledged receipt of a petition signed by. 25 residents requestinrg� another review of the Five Corners area: to change the zoning from Multiple Dwelling to Single Family Residence. Noelle Charleson stated the first available date due to publication purposes laould be July 13, 1977, and the property owner was not the petitioner, but neighbors within the area are sponsors of the petition. Chairman Naughten read the request aloud. COMMISSIONER MCGIBBON i1OVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WALKER, TO SET THIS ITEM ON THE JULY 13 AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Naughten requested a report from Commissioner Hall, Co -Chairman of the Sign Committee, of the action and/or progress of the committee. Commissioner Hall stated the committee had met six times and were working toward tnc development of. a sign ordinance for the City, one that would be acceptable_ to ill citizens or at least the majority. A time consuming item is the enforcement procedure the committee is studying at the present time, and Commissioner Hall stated she would have a report for the Planning Commission after three or four more meetings. CONTINUED AGENDA R-2-77 STANLEY VAUFFMANN - Approval of the Contract rezoning property from RS-20 to CW, at northwest corner of 75th West and 162nd-S.W.,' subject to certain conditions. Ms. Charleson stated this item was the contract which would effectuate the concept of the rezone heard at the last hearinq, May 25,1977. The proposal was to rezone property from Single Famil; Residential RS-20 to Commercial Waterfront CW. Under d contra rezone, Ms. Charleson continued, ftitdris that when the property is rezoned the applicant submits certain conditions which will bind any future use of the property. Ms. Charleson then briefed the Commission on the item; covered during the last meeting. The key points of the contract tendered by the applicant, Stanley Kauffmann are (1) he will dedicate a strip of property 10'x 60' on the. westiboundary of his lot, (2) install one 5,000 gallon fuel storage tank buried underground, (3) restore the ground to similar conditions as it exists at the present time, (4) agrees to bind himself and future owners to no future above -ground structures or vehicles of any kind relating to this use or any future use. Ms. Charleson said.the other key suggestions, after meeting with the City Attorney, were: Mr. Kauffmann agreed earlier in hearings he would agree to take the existing storage tank off the dock at Laebugten Wharf, which was not stated in the contract and it was recommended to be included. Among the considerations for the Commission tonight would be: If it were necessary to incorporate a driveway for the fuel storage truck on site (not mentioned in the contract); the drawing submitted should be drawn to scale, shoving the dedication per the official street map and Engineering Division requirements showing the exact location of the tank and accompanied by a title report. Ms. Charleson stated the contract did meet substantial requirements discussed at the May 25, 1977 Planning Commission meeting and she reconmiended approval of the contract under the conditions set at that time: (1) removal of the r 1,000 gallon fuel tank situated presently on the wharf; (2) revised site plan drawn to scale showing dedication Der official street map; Engineering Division requirements with exact location of the tank; (3) a title report accompanying the contract. The driveway would be at.the discretion of the Commission and also the landscape conditions. Ms. Charleson showed slides.of the area previously shown at the last meeting. The public portion of the hearing was then opened. P Mr. Kauffmann stated he had submitted a completeset of drawings on Tuesday, June 7, and thought they were adequate. He stated deliveries to the new tank would be approximately twice monthly (10,C00 gallons per month) and Ire felt a driveway would not be necessary and might be utilized by beach parking, creating possible fire hazards. i Cliff Lawson of 16221 75th Place 4Jest, spoke stating that at the previous hearing Mr. Kauffmann had agreed to landscape Lot 10 and after. having spoken, to some residents, they felt this was a fair.trade-off.. Also, there is a great deal of teenage activity there and they might 6btain access to the fuel tank; he felt the storage unit should have adequate security measures. Mr.Kauffmann stated the tanks would be padlocked and a fence would only make it -more conspicuous; he wanted to leave the poplar tree and berry busies for covering. The public portion of the hearing was closed as there was no further participation. Commissioner LaBelle asked about the Fire Department's role; Harry Whitcuttanswered stating the Fire Department will issue tl?e permit for the tank and make inspections. Commissioner McGibbon asked about line installation and Mr. Whitcuttstated it would be the Fire Department's responsibility to install the tank and pump.o Noelle Charl."son added that if pipes are underground, a Street Use Permit will be required. COMMISSIONER McGIBBON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HALL. THAT R-2-77 CONTRACT REZONE BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDNONDS AND STANLEY uJFFMAN AS SIGNED BE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS: THAT THE FUEL TANK NOW EXISTING ON LAEBUGTEN WHARF BE REMOVED AND AT NO TIME IN TiE FUTURE FUEL OIL BE STORED (MAKING THE REMOVAL A PERMANENT ONE)' ANO REVISE THE SITE PLAN INDICATING THE EXACT PIECE OF PROPERTY TO BE DEI CATED, THE LOCATION OF THE TANK BE SUBMITTED TO BE APPROVED BY THE PL.;NNING DEPT., AND A TITLE REPORT BE SUBi•1ITTED. MOTION CARRIED. Edmonds Planning Commission Page 2 - June 8, 1977 EDMONDS PLANNIIIG COiiMISSION May 25, 1977 The regular meeting of the Edmonds Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Larry Naughten at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds. Civic Center. Chairman Naughten welcomed those present and explained the procedure of the meeting. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Larry Naughten i C. Richard Goodhope Noelle Charleson, Asst. City Planner Fred Ross Valina Walker Dick Allen, Asst. City Engineer John McGibbon I Richard Dickson John Wallace, City Attorney Keith LaBelle Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Ray Sittauer Jackie Parrett, DeputyCity Clerk Laura Hall Tom Carns, Ex officio APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the neeting of May 11, 1977 had been posted, mailed, and distributed. COMMISSIONER SITTAUER ilOVED, SECOiJDED BY COMMISSIOiIER LaBELLE, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF i•1AY 11, 1977. HOTIOPI CARRIED. AGENDA Chairman Naughten announced that ZO-5-77 would not be heard this evening because the notification was not published in the newspaper. Ile said it would be on the June B agenda. -R-2-7T; STANLEY,.KAUFFMANN - Contract Rezone from`RS-20 to.Ci•1 at northwest corner } of.75'th `sW_and- 162nd S.W. Ms. Charleson said the purpose of the proposed contract rezone was to permit a fuel storage facility which I./i11 be buried beneath the ground. She exp.lained the difference between a contract rezone and an ordinary rezone. She said, the applicant was proposing certain conditions which would be part of the rezone: (1) The tank WOUld be buried; (2) Ile will landscape the site; and (3) No further structure would ever be located on the site. These conditions would be considered to be a part of the contract, and only the uses stated by the applicant would be permitted. The reason for the action was that he ;anted to put in a larger, foal storage tank for Laebugten Wharf. The applicant owns Lots 1 through 10 of the plat, but' only Lot 10 was proposed for the contract rezone and 'Is. Charleson stressed that Lots 1 through 9 would not be affected. Ns. CP,:arleson indicated that all the surrounding property except for the wharf ard the railroad was single family. She showed slides of the property and noted that the site is covered with blackberry bushes and there are springs on the property. The tank proposed to be placed on the site would replace the 1,000 gallon tank presently located on the wharf, the new tank being of 5,000 gallon capacity. Part of the reason for locating the tank underground was that the Uniform Fire Code does not permit tanks of this size on a dock. The tank is,5' x 17' and will be buried 2' underground. Pis. Charleson said the site would be landscaped to appear attractive after the tank is buried, and 10' of the west portion.of the site would be dedicated to help the access to 75th W. The tank would be filled by a trer_k approxicrately twice a month, and the fuel lines would go from the tank, under the railroad tracks, to the dock. A lease agreement would exist beb-/een Laebugten Wharf and the user of the site, so there could potentially be two different owners at some future time. City Attorney John llallace interjected that ownership is not relevant to the rezone question. Ms. Charleson noted strengths and weaknesses of the proposal. She said that from the fire safety standpoint this site would be the safest location for the tank, and that it could not be located on the dock; no permanent structure could ever be located on the site so it would be permanent open space, preserving some neighborhood views; no traffic would be generated and .a pull-out area could be established for parking of the fuel truck. Regarding weaknesses of the proposal, fis. Charleson said this.is an established, low density, large lot, single family neighborhood into which a commercial intrusion would be created. Ther(.would be a fuel truck arriving to fill the tank and, although the hours of delivery could be restricted, the restriction would be difficult to enforce; maintenance of the site would be difficult to enforce and trash, litter, and oil from the tank could accumulate; there was the possibility that some future ' owner might not be 6s conscientious as the applicant about the maintenance of the site; although the fuel tank itself.would not create a traffic problem, larger amounts of available fuel could help to create more activity at the wharf (Commissioner Sittauer said that -was not a valid I assumption as the smaller tank would simply be filled more often); the Comprehensive Land Use Plan approved this year does not indicate this land as commercial, but as single family, the City Council having examined each area of the City to see where commercial expansion could be accom- plished and not soldesignating this area; open space would also be pre- served by keeping the site RS-20; and the road between the site and the wharf now makes a good separation between the two zones. She then recommended the proposal. be denied as it conflicts with the planned land use for the area, represents a use not compatible with a low density, single family neighborrhood, and it is far from the commercial center of the town. She felt the conditions of the.contract may be difficult to enforce and that there were alternatives for providing fuel by placing fuel tanks west of the railroad. She felt that for the long range planning of the area the single family residential zoning was the best use of this property. Assistant City Engineer Dick Allen said he had checked with industrial facilities and that there was no safety problem with the underground storageltanks. The public portion of the hearing was then opened. Stanley Kauffmann said he really did not want a rezone, that he had assumed he could do this with a Conditional Use Permit. He said he was not in favor of spot zoning and only wanted to put the tank in a safer location. He said the hazard is greater by hiving the tank on the pier and the larger tallk would eliminate some of the traffic for refueling. He said the wharf has added to the community and he has had all but one party who objected to it return and congratulate him on the appearance. He said there is all kinds of rubbish on this site under the berry bushes and it will be a policing problem no matter who owns the property. He felt'it.should go back to its natural state after the tank is buried. Chairman Naughten said the file had a letter from' Phyllis Wiggins of 16012 74th Pl. 1-1. who was concerned with the word "Cowl lie rcial." She interpreted that to mean more traffic problems and recommended fir. Kauffmann be given a waiver from the residential restrictions Without rezoning to commercial. Glen Loboudgerof 15920 72nd W. asked if this came under the purview of the Shorelines Management Act, and Hs. Charleson responded that if it falls within 200' of shoreline he will be required to get a shoreline permit. Mr. Loboudgeralso wanted the definition of "structure," and City Attorney John Wallace advised that the applicant would be limited only to the use that he requests and he cannot come in later and add something else. Mr.Loboudger objected to the encroachment of a comi-iercial activity in a residential area. Cliff Lawson of 16221 75th Pl. W. spoke in opposition, saying that even prior to annexation the area had been RS-20. He said he had vacant land he wished to develop and felt everyone should have the same restrictions. Shirley Hall of 432 Olyripic said the EDMONDS PLANNING COHNISSION Page 2 - May 25, 1977 site woula not change visually in any way by having the tank installed and that there would be less traffic created by the delivery truck. Don Davenport of 19927 31st P1. bl. felt the larger fuel tank would be a convenience factor for boaters in the area, noting that they have run out of fuel in the Edmonds boat harbor. Fie pointed out that many homes have fuel trucks delivering oil and that was no different from this kind of delivery. William Scott of 320 120th, Everett, said he had a power of attorney to represent John Sanderlin whose property is irciediately to the south of this site. He felt the larger tank would increase the business at the wharf and that the traffic had already been increased there. He felt the applicant was not going by the same rules as others must follow. Chairman Naughten explained that the applicant was only ' following the procedures given him by the City Staff. Cliff Lawson asked Ms. Charleson to explain how this matter had come to light, and she responded that the item came'to the attention of the Planning Department through some phone calls, one being from lir. Lawson. She said she investigated and found the owner was Mr. Kauffmann, and she explained to him that such a use would not be permitted in a single family zone. His attorney then contacted the City Attorney and action t•ras then followed up by the Planning Department. Skip Simmons, Fire Inspector for the City, said the Fire Department recom- mended the underground tank he permitted from the safety viewpoint as it is the safest way ;to store fuel. Regarding maintenance and upkeep, he said there are City ordinances governing that and inspection people to see they are enforced. Ile questioned t•rhether the contract rezone would apply to a future owner or manager. Ile was advised that the contract is entered into by the applicant and the City and is recorded, binding any future owners, and-cdn be changed only by going back through the rezone process. Alex Taylor, Richmond Beach resident, said he previously had lived at 19004 84th.W. and.that it was always difficult to get a boat into the water in Edmonds. Ile said Mr. Kauffmann had improved the wharf property and had contributed to the City, and he felt his application should be approved. Joan Miller of 16131 75th W., directly across from the site, commented that thislis a slide area and that they have had water pipes break because of this. She was concerned that the fuel pipes could break. Mr. Kauffman explained that the tank will have a double fuel line system, that it is safer than natural gas lines. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Skip Simmons stated that the Fire Code specifically addresses buoyancy areas, requiring that the tanks be anchored. lie said there will be many extra precautions taken with valves in a slide area. He said he had dis- cussed this with Planning Department personnel and disagreed with their recommendation for disapproval. The applicant was asked if he could come up with an alternative location for the tank and he said Ire could not, that the Coast Guard and Fire Department establish where it can be placed. Commissioner Sittauer said he had to agree with the Fire Inspector with regard to fire safety in this matter. He said he,ordi.narily is against contract rezones in residential areas, but in this case it was logical and would not be detrimental to the neighborhood. THEREFORE, COIT_,IISSIONER SITTAUER MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER McGIBBON, THAT R-2-77 BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 8 AT WHICH TIME THE APPLICANT IJILL SUBMIT THE CONTRACT WITH THE SAFETY STIPULATIOiiS, AND THAT THE HEARING PROCESS IS COMPLETED. MOTION CARRIED. A short recess was announced. PRD-1-77 SEAVIEW PINES #2 - Planned Residential Development south side of 194th St. S.W. at 89th Pl. I.I. (RS-12) Applicant: Bjorn Theusen Ms. Charleson explained for the audience how a PRD is different from other subdivisions. She showed, the location on a vicinity map and noted it is surrounded by single family zoning. She noted that it is in an environmentally sensitive area because of tiie steep" slopes on the site. EDMONDS PLANNING COi-iiIISSION Page 3 - May 25', 1977 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF.THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, BY CHANGING THE ZONING. CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN SAID CITY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 20,000 SQUARt FEET (RS-20) TO WATERFRONT COMMERCIAL (CW) PURSUANT TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 592, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT AND COVENANTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 592, a public hearing was called by the City Council.of the City of Edmo�-ids, and at the conclusion of said hearing the City Council having determined as follows: 1. That the proposed zoning change conforms with the intent!of the comprehensive plan; 2. That the proposed zoning change bears a reasonable relationship to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding and nearby properties; 3. That the proposed zoning will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; 4. That the subject property is suited for the purpose for which it is proposed to be zoned; 5. That the proposed use of the property with the restrictions imposed in the concomitant agreement is compatible with the surrounding properties; 6. That there are no significant adverse envizon mental impacts to the surrounding properties either within or •• ti without the jurisdiction of the City of Edmonds, which will be directly affected by the proposed use of the property as a result of the certain additional limitations imposed byecontract tendered by the owner to the City, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Edmonds, Washington, be and the same is hereby amended by changing the.zoning classification of the following described property from single family residence, 20,0.00 square feet (RS- 2D) to Commercial Waterfront (CW) , all situate in the i City of Edmonds; Snohomish County, Washington, and legally described as follows: "Lot 10, Elock 5S, ��Ieadowdaie Beach, according to Plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, Page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington.. Section 2. The Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works are hereby authorized and directed to effectuate the necessary amendments to the Official Zoning Map of the City, pursuant to this ordinance. Section 3., The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute, and the City Clerk to attest, that certain document entitled "Contract Rezone Agreement and Covenant" consisting of 7 typewritten pages and a site plan relating to the above described property and attached thereto, which was executed by the owners of said property on the 23rdday of January , .1978, and tendered to the City. The City cl.el-I, -�_s further directed to record said contract rezone agreement and covenant with the Snohomish County Auditor as a covenant running,with the land. The cost of recordation shall be paid by the owners. The City Clerk is further authorized to record with the!Snohomish County Auditor a Quit Claim Deed covering a portion of the above described property and executed by the owners on April 14, 1978. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication by posting as provided by lbw. APPROVED: MAYOR, H. H. Harrison ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, Irene Varney Moran APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY i1 FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: May 15, 1978 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: POSTED: EFFECTIVE DATE: 11 k COPY LAW OFFICES OF OGDEN, OGDEN & MURPHY RAYMOND D.OGDEN (1876-1972) SUITE IOIS (206) 622-2991 RAYMOND D•OGDEN, JR. JAMES A.MURPHY 1411 FOURTH AVENUE BUILDING RONALD A.MURPHY JOHN D. WALLACE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 DOUGLAS E. ALBRIGHT WAYNE O. TANAKA LEE CORKRUM G. GEOFFREY GIBBS I� .•,1r _'CEiVEt3 March 29, 197 MAR 3 U 197$ Dir. Of Public Works Mr. Robert Jaffe 3000 Seattle rirst rational Rank Bldg. Seattle, Washington 981S4 Re: Kauffmann Dear Mr. Jaffe: Enclosed pleats* find a Quit Clain 'Dead to be executed by your clients and the Kauffmanns. As You Will recall, the proposed, Quit Claim Deed submitted by fir. Kauffmann did not include an extra five feet slang the westerly boundary of the road area. Z have spoken with Mr. Xauffmana and he is agreeable to quit claim the extra five feast. Your conversation with se indicated that the Northfi*14s would have no objection to quit claiming this additional five feet. After you have had your clients execute this deed, would you please forwards it to Mr. xauffmann for his signature. After all parties have executed the same, the proposed contract roxone: may be considered by the City Council. Very truly yours, orriCE or THs CTTIY AnToa EY Wayne Tanaka ffT*WTwTZV_ Enclosures act Vif Larson Joba La Ile Stan Sauffann � STREET FILE February 10, 1978 MEMO TO: John LaTourelle, Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson, P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: KAUFFMANN REZONE AT 162ND AND 75TH Following your memo of February 3, 1978, we reviewed the proposed right-of-way dedication in the attached quit claim deed. The description has been written so that the City would have right -of -way -only to the edge of the asphalt pavement. This right-of-way location will present a problem to the City as there will -be no room for shoulder, utilities, and traffic control signs on the west side of the road. We would, therefore, require that an additional five feet be granted on the west side of 75th Place for such purpose as indicated. The quit claim deed should, therefore, be amended to include the additional right-of-way. IE" RHA:ly '�w 2—)l 0 C-�'/ c' Ass t.C.E. ate Adjn.Sec.ate 1JR t3�alw � CITY OF EOMO-N DS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: LU H Q W SUSPENSE DATE: DIRECTOR (p r Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare letter/memo for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY i/ ASST. CITY ENGINEER BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPT. EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPT. STREET DIVISION SUPT. TREATMENT PLANT SUPT. WATER/SEWER SUPT. COMMENTS: FROM: y DATE: RECEIVED FEB 6 1978 Dir. Of Public Works February 3, 1978 MEMO TO: Leif Larson, Director Public Works Department FROM: John LaTourelle, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: KAUFFMANN REZONE AT 162nd and 75th Stanley Kauffmann has submitted the required survey of the property on which he has requested a contract . rezone. Please review the enclosed legal description of the property to be dedicated to theCity, and submit your comments to this Department by February 14, 1978. -J� I ZZ NC/mt Attachment CONTRACT REZONE AGREEMENT AND COVENANT AGREEMENT AND COVENANT between STANLEY KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFM.ANN, his wife, K. EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD �CniU?(!1Y>S ��1R7H%j1=117 WILLIAM 0. NORTHFIELD EV4///,HA2 /1 ,i,;�l-�G��� , and N_ANCY IRENE :JORTHFIELD 1f��liyr ✓ _l�� N /L�r,Tiff-/� Li7 , hereafter jointly and seve ally referred to as "Owners," and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation. WHEREAS, Owners are the owners of real property situate in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows: Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Emonds for a Contract Rezone from Single -Family Residence— 20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CW) for the purpose of installing a gasoline -fuel storage,tank capable of storing 5,000 gallons, and WHEREAS, the.Owners have offered to tender to the City of Edmonds this Agreement and Covenant respecting limitations on the use of the property, and WHEREAS, the covenants and agreements herein are intended to constitute the basis for the rezone set forth above and are intended to be effective from the effective date of said rezone, and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property will have a substantial relation to the people, land and resources, health, welfare, safety and morals of the citizens of the City of Edmonds, and the Owners recognize the need for the control, cooperation and securing the proper development of the property to be compatible with the surrounding uses, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 1. The property which is the subject of this Agreement is legally described as follows: Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded.in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington. 2. This Agreement is tendered to the City of Edmonds by the Owners, and said Agreement is hereby accepted Page one FYHISIT B by the City of Edmonds. All parties agree that it is applicable to the parties to this Agreement, their heirs, successors, assigns and future owners or users of the subject property, both as to duties and benefits. The Owners agree that this Agreement will be specifically enforceable in equity by the City of Edmonds. 3. The City of Edmonds is under no obligation to issue to Owners, their successors or assigns, building or other permits for improvements or. structures on the subject property, unless such improvements comply substantially with the site plan attached hereto, with the terms of this Agreement and with applicable ordinances at the time of application for said permits. 4. This Agreement and each part of it shall be con- sidered a covenant running with the land described in this Agreement and shall be binding upon the Owners, their successors and assigns, and shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the Grantor --Grantee Index, with the Owners being listed as Grantors and the City of Edmonds, as Grantee, all the costs of such recording shall be paid by the Owners. Payment of said costs shall be a condition precE:dent to exercising any rights under the terms of this Agreement. 5. This Agreement and Covenant is conditioned upon said legally described property being rezoned from Single -Family Residence--20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CPI). 6. Owners and their successors or assigns shall be limited in the use and development of the above - described property to the installation of one 5,000-gallon gasoline -fuel storage facility, subject to the following additional limitations: a. Said fuel -tank. facility shall be entirely buried underground, except for necessary venting and filling tubes. b. Owners shall restore the surface of the subject property to the contours as now exist. C. No permanent above -ground structure shall be installed on the subject property, except for necessary venting and filling tubes*of the fuel -storage tank. Page two d. Said fuel. tank shall be Located on the property as set forth on the site plan attached hereto, and incorporated in full by this .reference. 7. Owners agree to dedicate a strip of land on the Easterly L1.01 existing road portion of the property to the City of Edmonds .for street purposes. The loc,ati.on of anid dedication is more particularly described on the site plan attac!�ed herein. 8. The Owners agree that in the event it is necessary for the City of %'dmonds to bring legal action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the Owners trill pay costs, reasonalle attorney's fees and reasonable expert witness fees as determined by the court in the event; the City of Edmonds is successful. in the suit. 9. Owners shal.l. furnish, at their sole expense, suit- able t;i.tl.e reno.r. t for the sub iect; property. 10. Ot.ne�°s, at. t•hei r sole expense, slh,nI1 perm•anentl.y re- movo the exi sti ng fuel. tank on the Leebugten Fishing VJ11arf. Thereafter no other fuel- storage tank shall be placed or maintained on the Laebugtcn'Fishing Wharf. Removal of said fuel. tank shall_ be effected as soon as possi.bl.e after installation of the 5,000- gallon fuel. storage facility to be Located on the subject property. 11. No application shall be made by Owners or their successors or assigns to amend. this Agreement for a period. of two years .from the date of this Agreement. Thereafter, either Owners or' their successors or assigns or the City of Edmonds may, upon application fil.led in the same manner as n rezone application, apply to amend or terminate the provisions and covenants of this Agreement or to change the zoning :of subject property:" ropertySaid appl.icati.on to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other applica- tion for a rezone of property. Such action by the City of Edmonds shall. not release the Owners or their successors or assigns from the obligations and duties assumed under this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement on this A- day of _Jdn 1978 ''..i. • • 1 _ 1 1 j} r �� 2O. zo• t i:r. 1. \ � i 1 - 1 / 1 M..1•-�.I.J-. �t.: • is- 40 19, a 5000 Go/%n. ' ; O �Fue/ Tonk 17' O p 1'' o Loco//on , •�- � ,� @gig' � 1.' 1(`��Q � c ' - �1-f'..�.4-'ply. `N✓•. . .: is •,�^�. v+n LOT /D, &0, 59, i°LAT OF MfADOIVD,4Lf DfACH, ✓01.5/°Gr3B, SNOHOM/j// COUNTY, GY.9SH/NO701Y ;. LAND GROUP FOUR, Inc. AL O T PZ A N 19707 99th Avenue West Cil S /?. X4llflrl MAN Lynnwood, Washington 88036 . 206 7754581 ! ' [Y[V[VIMe [M[IM[OIIM• PLAMMIM• YAMA48M[IR 761h A/oce Nes f DRAWN CHECKED BY A►►ROV[D /Y Edmonds Worhin fan II. I q7 IUITCLAIM D EE The Grantor.... herein ........................................... for the consideration of the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and also of benefits to accrue -_- by reason of laying out and establishing a public road through..................................property, and which is hereafter described, do:..... convey, release and quit -claim to the City of Edmonds, State of Washington, for the use of the public forever, as a public road and highway, the following descril,ed real t;state, including., anv interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire, viz: That portion of LOT 10, BLOCK 59, in the plat of MEADOWDALE BEACH as recorded in Volume 5, of plats, page 38 records of Snohomish County, I! Washington described as follows: I� COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Lot; thence S 89°46'16" W along the North line of said LOT a distance of 28 feet more or less I to the Westerly edge of existing pavement of 75th Place West and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence N 89°46'16" E along said North line 28 feet I) more or less to the Northeast corner of said LOT; thence S 14021116"W II along the East line of said LOT a distance of 60.00 feet to the South— east corner of said LOT; thence S 89°46'16" W along the South line of said LOT a distance of 33 feet more or less to said edge of existing pavement; thence Northerly along said edge to the POINT OF BEGINNING. i I situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. The Grantor...- hereby agree.... and consent.... to the establishment of said road as surveyed and, of record in the 1 City of Edmonds Engineer's office as Survey No ...................... and to the perpetual maintenance of the same as a City Street, and waive.... all claim for damages of whatever kind which may be occasioned to adjacent land by the location, establishment, construction, drainage and maintenance of said street, and agrees and consents to the right of the City to I,! make all necessary slopes for cuts and fills whenever they extend beyond the riglit-of-way line, upon above mentioned street, all in conformity with standard practices of City street construction, and to the same extent and purpose as if it the rights herein -ranted had been acquired by condemnation proceedings under Eminent Dontain Statutes of the State nl Washington, iy; Said cuvenaul.:; :;hall run wil,li Hit! I:uul and be binding upon the granter successors or assigns. Dater) this day of .. _.. _.............. . A.D., 19 �i i., 1 Ii CONTRACT' REZONE AGREEMENT AND COVENANT RECEIVEQ FEB. - n) 1978 L1'1 C) M City of Edmonds Community Deft, Dent AGREEMENT AND COVENANT between STANLEY KAUFFMANN anti DAPHNE KAUFFZ&�dNN, his wife, K. EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD � Z2An,1&,p_,3 WILLIAM . O . NORTHFIELD [ a2 h1 _ 4±14TjEand NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD dAAi: lQ� N,c r hereafter jointly and seveTally referred to as."Owners," and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation. CITY CLERK Civic Center Edmonds, Washington WHEREAS, Owners are the owners of real property situate in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish -County, Washington, and more particularly described as follows: Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Emonds for a Contract Rezone from Single -Family Residence— 20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CW) for the purpose of installing a gasoline -fuel storage tank capable of storing 5,000 gallons, and WHEREAS, the Owners have offered to tender to the City of Edmonds this Agreement and Covenant respecting limitations on the use of the property, and WHEREAS, the covenants and agreements herein are intended. to constitute the basis for the rezone set forth above and are intended to be effective from the effective date of said rezone, and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property will have a substantial relation to the people, land and resources, health, welfare, safety and morals of the citizens of the City of Edmonds, and the Owners recognize the need for the control, cooperation and securing the proper devel_onment of the property to be compatible with the surrounding uses, NOW, -THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:. 1. The property which is the subject of this Agreement NO SALES TA ks legally described as follows: REQUIRE® Parcel A, Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, MAY 2 5 1978 according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington. MRKE VIVERS, Snohomish Cooly lreasurrr BY This Agreement is tendered to the City of Edmonds Deputy by the Owners, and said Agreement is hereby accepted Vol1314 pQcE740 7805240273 Page one EXHIBIT B a CITY CLERK • • Civic Center Edmonds, Washington by the City of Edmonds. All parties agree that it is applicable to the parties to this Agreement, their heirs, successors, assigns and future owners or users of the subject property, both as to duties and benefits. The Owners agree that this. Agreement will be specifically enforceable in equity by the City of Edmonds. 3. The City of Edmonds is under no obligation to issue to Owners, their successors or assigns, building or other permits for improvements or: structures on the subject property, unless such improvements comply substantially with the site plan attached hereto, with the terms of this Agreement and with applicable ordinances at the time of application for said permits. 4. This Agreement and each part of it shall be con- sidered a covenant running with the land described in this Agreement and shall be binding upon the Owners, their successors and assigns, and shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the Grantor --Grantee Index, with the Owners being listed as Grantors and the City of Edmonds, as , Grantee, all the costs of such recording shall be paid by the Owners. Payment of said costs shall be a condition precE!dent to exercising any.rights under the terms of this Agreement. 5. This Agreement and Covenant is conditioned upon said legally described property being rezoned from Single -Family Residence--20,000 square feet (RS-20) to Waterfront Commercial (CW). 6. Owners and their successors or assigns shall be limited in the use and development of the above - described property to the installation.of one 5,000-gallon gasoline -fuel storage facility, subject to the following additional limitations: a. Said fuel -tank facility shall be entirely buried underground, except for necessary venting and filling tubes. b. Owners shall restore the surface of the subject property to the contours as now exist. c. No permanent above -ground structure shall be installed on the subject property, except for necessary venting and.filling tubes of the fuel -storage tank.. 780524027 ... Page two r • �'�` i;1lY CLERK • • • Civi C'enter :;rnii oucl�, 4'•i£i ;hltinp ton d.. Said :fuel tank shall. be .located on the property as set forth on the site plan attached hereto, and incorporated. in full by this reference. 7. Owners agree to dedicate a strap of land on the Easterly )1.01 existing road portion of the property to the City of Edmonds for street purposes. The location of laid dedication is more particularly described on the site plan attached hereto. 8. The Owners agree that in the event it is necessary for the City of Edmonds to bring legal action.to enforce: the' provisions -,of this `Agreement, the Owners will pay costs, reasonal.be attorneys fees arid. reasonable expert witness fees as.determined by the court in -the event the City of Ed.monds is successful in the suit. 9.1 Owners shall furnish, at their sole expense, suit- able title report for the subject property. 10. Owners, at their sole expense, shall permanently re- move the existing fuel tank on the Laebugten Fishing Wharf. Thereafter no other fuel storage tank shall be placed or'maintaned on -the Laebugten'Fishing Wharf., Removal of said fuel_ tank shall be effected as soon as possible after installation of the 5,000- gal.lon fuel storage facility to be located on the subject property. . 11. No application shall be made by Owners or their successors or assigns to amend this Agreement for a period. of two years from the date .of'this Agreement. Thereafter, either.Owners or -.their .successors or assigns 'or the, City of°Edmonds may, upon application;..•., filled in the same manner ss a � rezone appl`ication,'`' ''' ' apply to amend or terminate 'the"Prodisions and - covenants of this Agreement ors to c.hnnf;e the zoning; 1,of subject property. Said application to change or terminate the provisions and covenants or to rezone said property shall be heard in the normal manner at appropriate public hearings as any other applica- tion for a rezone of property. Such action by.the City of Edmonds shall not release the Owners or their successors or assigns from the obligations and duties assumed under this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement. on this a day of adn , 1978 7805240,e.? 3 tiOL J314 rncr 742 ;tir»t•. ':��"....:°'i_�1T.S:=.._ ^...='".M.LlYT[id»'"r ,^ty. `I'.. .�.__.. _�.. • •. CITY CLERK • Civic Center Edmonds, w° i7.!,;n,ton C W V CITY OF E(DM�OONND.�S : Mayor, h. H. Harrison ATTEST: / _ C= 'City Clerk, Irene Prney Moran ti William O. Northfi d :z]Z ;u N .c C-3co �v J rn zN o Nancy Ir" e Northfield Page four 0524' �o� 1314. 743 • • • • CITY CLERK Civic Center Edmonds. wasnin^,ton STATE'OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of Snohomish ) On this �- day, of 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared H. H. HARRISON and IRENE VARNEY MORAN, to me known to be the Mayor and the City Clerk,'respectively, of the CITY OF EDMONDS, the municipal corporation that executed the fore- going instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to. be the free and voluntary.act and deed of said municipal corporation,.for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are. authorized to execute the said instrument. �., C.�'. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the ,� .•" < <dal. and year in this certificate ove written. �J � P UL' NO AR PUBLIC in and for the 25 ,yc`�'. State of Washin ton, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss County of SN0446Ml S* On this (Z0 day of JAN U14(I.i•, , 1978, before me,. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared STANLEY KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFMAN, husband and wife, to me known to be the individuals described in .and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free 'ixrd- voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes ther.,e'-i'y�! mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and offici s the d adcb9b y �� last above written. PUBLI i and fok'•:t .e. ' 4�� • e of Washington, resi&in at. l=.Omo ITS Page five //011314 �' _744 • - /-'1 • • • CITY CLERK Civic Center Edmonds, Washington STATE OF WASHINGTON ), ss. County of KI1bpP ) On this �5 day of --NE I 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and swo n grsonally appeared K . EDMUNDS NORTHFIELD , to me known to be the individual desc-Aibea in and who execute, the within and foregoing i strument and acknowledged that signed the same as - free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my. hand and official seal the da.y and year i a.:4t above written. �- '' �"NOVA Y PUBLIC in and for the -' •p \D� F'} `r } SES)Ve of,-Tashingto � residing ` ) ss County_ of MuLT+3c On this 1 day of 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Publ c in andlfor the State of Washington, duly commissioned and s� Nornl+� pP, ' o a�}y appeared WIL.LIAM 0. NORTHFIELD��rX` to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that signed the same as i �_ free and voluntary,, act and deed,. for the uses and purposes therein .men �ing�..do GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day a-hcj'.� q last above written. NOTPrRY-PUBLIC andor''t; n State of n, ' rOsid'i g''�� �'•�! at Page six 75 24 0 2 l 3 vot 1314 r, ,,' 745 • , • . • 'CITY CLERK Civic Center Edmonds, V� asii;n; ton STATE OF WASHINGTON ss County off : ze, ,�-1/1 ) On this ,� day of 1977, before me, ' the undersigned, a Notary Public', in and for the State of Washington, duly commission.d'and s orn, personally at NANCY IRENE NORTHFIELD.Al � to me known to be the in idual described in "and who executed the within and foregoing inst ment and acknowledgeal �N�11s� that, signed the same as N- free and voltiiit,at. act and deed for the uses andt e� ''' purposes therein mentioned. �, .;; GIVEN under my hand and official seal the day and y :.a-r 't last above written: f s •co r� NOTARY P BLIC in and for the State -) ashing qn, residing J Page seven 7805 24 02 73 De dl*cr, Icd /e 61�e v,,,7)&70l _V o)r ob /40 00 Y 4 s' k �Fuc/ ,5000 Op/144 fiqo* 17, z0co//a? � T jj1 NORTH jea IYel � -,rr /0 'VAL L hlt1 7Y GROUP FOUR, Inc... 19707 44th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 * .206 7754581 CITY CLERK Civic Center Edmonds, Washington / 1* LOT /a, ez aem J9, -Z,4,r Of M,-,40014,D,4ZZ= jZ!,4e-,,Y, YOZJ jg, J,Y0#0A41j,Y coawrr, A14JAIN040-ly 10Z 0 7 PZ 4 N J. R. AA IJAMA N M/H 761h Alme lYf.rl O • .� `" S FILE`= CITY CLERK 00C Center. WaShlngt DECLARATION, OF R-ESTRICTIVE COVENANT FISHING WHARF, c r- a va 1%'C* Washington !Ie-eafter referr ed to as t"Grantor,., is the -A, described real property situ.t. he in f JIM County' Washington, to -wit! cr Lots 9, 10 and 11, Block �!'%UrclinC to -h I Neadowdale Tide Lands, of ;:1-t", --e Plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 st,:)tc of e records 04r the Audit., of the o a!! --gton,* �1 's of reco-d --- TOGETHER including, but not to easement across Orth,=rs "RailrLm 'I the Burlington -.�•desL:rit)E�d pro,� "-property adjacent to the above- J the Grantor desires to impose es trictive -U"-'n the land upon said pre"' i a th D-ildi premises in com- xl� the State Uniformfo,,61 r� 504 and !-able 5- Building Ccdc, Section 2103, wilich deal With the subject of One hour the Property ir'=,d'ately adjacent to and Of the above -described real property is Presently . . . . . . . . . . and . . . . . . because 0. 71 ;f the lack of access 'ac other ada tors �a;`l a:!jacent PrOnerty will probably never be a:td thus the above thO '�::Ji ,017M -r0ferenced provisions of Building Cod` will probably nevc effecL, and. r have bcna- Ake, %S' the City Of Fdrionds, Washington, a munici on, p 110re3ftQr referred to as "Grantee,,, dLsires to lns':rC :ha should the -bove-,,2f,:�1,n,ed adjacent and southerlv P-`O',�ertv ever be develoD cd, that the Grantor be required to With the a!DOVe' -referOnced provisions Of the Building Code and the ar, -L'rr- P"cable Ordinances Of the -i- QA076 fi%r359 M, 7 J -41 - -e, CITY CLERK CMc Center F i ^" `•,s' r r;. r.`t;. .�t.• ,t y. WaWrp YJ I T N E S S Edmonds,ton E T Ff : ,;��� That for and i n consideration of benefits ~ to accrue, .he Grantor does hereby declare 1 . T and grant to t the City of '='ands as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, That to -wit: _ should at any time in the future a building i • -r other structure be placed on the property immediately ,acent to and southerly of the •''' •.rv•, •• '�- Grantors property described, `.ereinabove, Grantor agrees to fullycom F1Y with 1 7` r!µ• f ", ' sions of the Stat f the provi- e Uniform Building Code,Section 21 - 03, 504 ' and Table S-A or ,''e .•,..' ,-..>, :k�.,. ..,.• o (. any subseauent amendments thereto and'all 4r applicable ordinances of the City of Edmonds, which compliance shall include but not necessar �r ily be limited to the i.nstalla- io: of i:nprcvements �# } to the building on said premises to • .+r1 comply -t h the above referenced code. "$ y' ti• , 2. Grantor agrees to pay for all costs and expenses of Grantee incurred in connection withthe preparation , }' of this1:C1UdIng , but ;r"C.• ist .�( {,. S..J',Yart•eo„ not limited to the following: (a) All of the City of Edmonds, staff time used in pre?ardtion and negotiation or review of this covenant. (b) All costs, disbursements and attorneys' fees Inc, 5y Grantee in the preparation, negotiation or execu- tion of this covenant. (C) All costs and expenses _ of recording this �•kh,^"'•"''`.»�%,"'^-.x�" nh+•. •� }'� covenant with the Count y Auditor, „fix x"�qx ant Snohomish Count 3. y' Washington. F., In the event Grantor fails to comply with this and covenant Grantee is reouired to seek, legal advice St.+on' ""'dM►M4i. p`l .+,.a4. x �• 'H'`'L +r'T',*.'� `Mvq: or comet en.ce litigation to enforce the *u A. covenant, Grantor a green to pay all costs, expenses and fees of the ` � Grantee including g but not limited �` ��"�'�� ���, 3..KZ•w. to the following: (a) In the event that a lawsuit is not started, all expenses a.^.d costs for •.-•................._.....;.,�>ti.�..r.,..- . attorne 's time spent in preparation, �:iation and discus sions with regard to enforcing the terms — F - �'i ` rrj�.F FA .. this covenant plus all Other s"•'4 "_"`�''3`r �_• costs and expenses incurred tr —2— VOL1076 ?AcE360 . ' ^_.''hS"�',�.y�'.d'JVKia "'J'4F' `-�1�-tee+' N7,* ..t'Y!•'. K••H�t �. r N C17Y CLERK _ cmc Center Unionds, Wathineton .`.... (b) In the event 1 itigation is aA° •}',"w. com.•r,enced: ����'• r-raw.• w �k (1) All w fitness' fees including g specifically �.". the actual fees paid by the City for any and all expert witnesses ::bother or not such .._ - oxcart witnesses testify at trial. (<) All attorneys' fees incurred by the City regardless Of whether the matter comes to trial after suit is (3) All other costs and disbursements' P* +•s• �^ �,J b, the Grantee in incurred connection with a trial or preparation for - i..Y. trial, to r a enforce , the provisions of this covenant. S• This restrictive covenant and :. all the terms thereof + �' srall be binding upon the present and future owners of said real estate and the Grantor's successors in and/or ` interest JSS1G,^.G. - DATED thisNV day of January, 1977-�y+ w , ; 1 GIV NT0R r 2 •` l w ,i••.. LAEBUGTER FISHING WHAIZF, INC. o:.ic u-S-•,l'�' •St nleY u.`fmann, p„T"':`r=1.:•.`w.t nesident J STATE OF 1,ASHIKGTON SS. � : a �r COL..^ �• '� � � r On this day persoa�lly a to me known to he appeared before me Stanley a< the president y Kau_.mann, ' <r:e cor•>oration that of I,aebugten Fishing Wharf, l+,r?ed the executed the foregoing inst", Inc., •• aid instrumentto be the ent, and acknow- free and�•3 s 1' coruoratior., for the voluntaryd us and purposes art on oa ' Stated us Poses ther and deed ? r31 that he .is authorized to therein mentioned, and 1t1u •..ta tt;c soal affixed is thi execute the said instrum M` corporate seal of ant '...;.',= y` s.3' } •: under my hand and v al 'al corr,orati.o:i. a°es;...a►rGirti�* t4�4�c�aW:' *r.r; .tanuar% 1977- Official s•= this r _ day of , • " . � `�� �CE+tY ���-��K��!_ �_ __ .�r•R c r �,' M'4 '£rny„'�` S�v'�"xr-a.Yr'�S �+�'w:.,+� . 1' and for the of l4ashington, residin g Sta o i !� t) -3- YOlV liJ iACEJft r•. 777 • . . ... .' _ .. _.,: :..,�<� :.•:ems •-r+••u:«•..:i«:. a. ,ly..ae,. _ Pi ~ t+Pf.�:.-..ar _.-.J.-_.f... ` _ _ - _ ___ J • ir.�c.i''.'� — �:+:..a. �_�_.._�_. ram...._: _- _ � 4' .ice J •'a .. - . S ''�. --. _-. t -;F: `S=.*'•a-'�.,.``w'^�,� .,';p, w.• `' •'/ -` ...r;•t'i.. YD. - .. 'y,••.+rn .c CYi BSelePivn�rNational U lI Utz, li jr, L�C_ d %natuance Company SEAL ESTATE CONTRACT ri � baONINOTON l rla Ot V1alON �C� rrns Coxraaer, made aed emered taro mu .a, Pd' t ate,, 1AMES B, IIABIES and MA4GARET H. / . 1970, W IIAQYES, his --1, and HE e9 °"� "#ter, and STANLEY�R. FE RAE HFINES, his wife, RBERT F. HAINES, JR. PH1LO ROGE ham' and DAPHNE KAUFFMAN, his wife saa.^d tha and EST'HER M. ROCERS. his if,. t�tttJESSE'rH: That tho ealkr ,. to ka to the Pub —,sod the Ourchaar d'cr1ed rsal mate. pith the appurtemaeq io Snohomish t eu to Darchia from the w1kr the fonovtng Lots 7, 8 9 10 Couatr. Stet. of wa.h(ngton: - REAL ESTATE SA f Lands, according 11, Block A. Tide Mead°w hale AMOUNT Soto Clb.OIn Volume 6 of Plats np3 he Plat 28, then of recorded, Auditor of the County of Snohomish, State of 'nZ 1 Washington. �z arm. and coodniay --_ of thi. o, I Q matntt me —.; Th. Parchar� vr+� u One Hundred Fifty Twenty Five Thousand and___ - no 10Thousand and am rcc.iyt ahercer k herch / Oths fa 150, 000.00 > DoW % of p�h r aehaankdtea, and eh. hntancn ar seid p; °K /1�rhs <a 25, 000.00 1 Dear mw One Thousand Two Hundred vrtCe °h"a N Pyd m muov,; interest on the diminishingand no/100ths (g1, 200, 00 balance at eight (8�) )and no more per month, including tWenty-fifth (25th) Payment on Bald contract. the Monthly Per a'vtum. theve Hundred and dimin eking balance at ($1, 500.00) D-Wars or more �ginnie with and 100ths Y Payment shall be One Thous be due on the 15th eight (8%) Per cent per annum Per moth' including interest on due on the igti�—may Of March 1970, The first monthly payment shall Sellers �Y oP each and e' n� thereafter untilach ioDowing Payment shall be purchasers at thigh their crossing agreement with the its contract is utte of closing, Great Paid in full. Sellers agree to NO�ethRailway to advise Sellers allow improvements to be mad prove their f• m writing and permission will be on existing facilities when the outstand'tnancial responsibility to make granted ' g when purchasers m writ. purchasers Dollars; ing balance of this contract is less than complete said One improvement and when Hundred Thousand ($100, 000.00 Sellers ogree to deliver to ) Property when Rrr, Purchasers an executed Bill of Sale for certain hasets have Paid the sum of $50, 000.00 on Purchasers l ventoried personal shall have perrniaslon to remove small the Principal purchass Closing of fitly contract. all building Price. b (30' x 30') from The Purchasers agree to Pay Sellers ten the wharf after on the above described proPcr Percent (lOrJo) commission of and/or water study tyT said leases would— all lease m i "anise• The location on wharf of future !edOt an educational, ce ti onaal, oceanographic Beano ontes derived I and this covenant shall run with the land, I assignee- graphic, research gnees or parties in interest, and shall be binding on all subs pproved by purchasers; Sellers agree to allo.v equant Purchasers, I one year from Purchasers to use the name "1IAINES FISHING WHARF" date of closing, ... In the event of default for period of the Se Purchasers and/or their assigns Ilers or their assigns the easement or license foracrossing trom the Great Northern Purchasers shall Y j insurance of protect the Sellers' in in an amount at least said property by math successors or aril MluaI [o chat required b ta`ning adequate Dollars; ells' and fire insurance in Y the G.-eat Northern q y, its abiliry of and said 5ellero are the amounr of Eighty Thous Railway, to be named as an additional Insured. and ($30,000.00) ! C?FICIAL RECORDS I - �� _ ' .. •Got ��� ;F�g� I _ t b 14-- �y melt ar`a�t6 said - - _. _ _ .. _ • • __ aDoa dalau;t. t)a mbar obI" e b mbimtied to Lt� ;ZYZ.3 to u 7'h• relict " uDo,a/rr ci 3 dw �tO -.dear tyyyD+b"`nd�t ' "'o �WYm`" cla�cro nr w,m [bc�a said cal state �_ u e .ewer K;bb� lr� a u �'i47 !ua Ymaot of the µrr ty racep dHault, and any WYmwt�a tmbi�de �S�+id7 _ D rc ant fart is the m °aO1l4T: °0a eaora>t �� aaoer above rpe L6 may attach alter tl o1 r�a:,v'4 throw tare, eta 6 m 4 to raervte tad th +ny De+roo otLerNtdyo1 t�4r Ezcepaons and res _` e1 rations to said Tidelands is claimed, corn contained to Deed from lion. whereby ed in the tnc 'r 'f Washin Naahln record foeslls, etc Y the grantor office of th, L.d;tor Sion under which excepts and reserves of Snohomish County, title right of en and the right of entry all ot(s, e be ex°rcistr nulfor °Nen. rY Por opening, develo gases, coal, Of a Provision eveloPing and w°rkin Ping and wor ores, minerals, such entry, has bee! made for fug minas, etc., lung mines, etc,, and the Nayment of alptovid�d that no rights shall ��IZght 1 n the general damages sus water not onlyPublic to sustained by reason for the prima �e unrestricWe use of all the (but nor limited to) fishing. NurPose of navi waters of a d recreational g• boating, bathin gation, but also for corollary boy of has been raised rposes, as dtose g• swimmin rollary Pur nanlrall waters may affect s swimming water water skiing and o Noses: including dellned by the decisional law of this to a aid lands Chet related maintained or and whether the level of the w submergence.)" this state. (Aff crs fluctuating level: ater Encroachments by a all of the Premises all as further subject to Such Imrnediatal • Portion of the ezis"n of pill ) adjofNn9 state land to the w g Eck, Pilin and ezls est oP and boathouse the bIu°prior oP Ung dock structure o tie , said prernls wellstructure onto the 1970, un a survey Prepsred n F do vdalo Av es a. as by the encr ti r their joS No, by Raskin Fishar iu enue on the East: all s oachInent Terms, 70a1192, Associates, Inc„ a disclosed by covenants conditions of the dated February 2, Railroad right-ofway in res I or easement (if any) to cross from the Premises JCL to the effect this successors CO be Insured, and s may have on Che Crest rs or assigns. object to futur untmPatred le North N &tildin et requirements oP said raaI access to and g and zoning ordinanrxs ! its type of building thereon. °f a county, city - -�_ ry or district regulating g the °CcupancY. or OFFICIAL RECORDS use fir, ! r tor 0 pe�t•aatta ...,.,...:... y .. 10, - ��--_. 04� 81f1O1 i l�lwRe'i"iiVVY1�!^�'f{_�4`t A -.. .• R4•!IA :�ai.�• -t�i'i"a+... �.�.... .c.j..� c+>b`'. -r: 1'-"�`� tb.r� • v---'+ Srr,�.•C �. A ;�., Y .. ;rani•�1,!...,.atoE��61i.'i�.44**'.ttt+FS�L t 1 t `\ *oTREET FILE CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works June 27, 1977 Mr. Stan Kauffmann, President Laebugten Wharf, Inc. 16111 76th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Kauffmann: SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL UTILITY CHARGE FOR RAILROAD PERMIT FEES In regards to the waterline installation servicing the Wharf improvements, it was necessary in your plan that the City obtain a permit from the railroad for that portion of the waterline that the City will maintain. The railroad has advised us that there is a continuing fee for such permits. Since this fee is not an ordinary item associated with the water utility services provided by the City, an additional charge will be placed on your utility billing to compensate for the amounts paid to the railroad. The utility billing will be increased $1.50 per month for the first 5 years and $ .85 per month there after. Yours very truly, SIGNED LEIF R. LARSON, P.E. Director of Public Works RHA:lee CC: Utility Billing As t. C.E. ate Util. Blg. a e in. Sec. ate DOT: Please start this charge. This was okayed by City Council on May 24, 1977. Dick STREET FILE .0 � June 17, 1977 MEMO TO: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson,.P.E. Director of Public Works SUBJECT: KAUFFMAN CONTRACT REZONE (FILE #R-2-77) In regard to the proposed Agreement dated May 28, 1977, we have the following comments to make: 1. The legal description should be altered to eliminate the term "Parcel A". That item has no relation to the description. 2. On item number one, page 1, we understand that a survey will be made of the property from which we can determine the proper location of the right-of-way to be dedicated. It is recommended that either the Agreement be held pending that determination or that the Agreement be altered -to generally state that the dedication will be made at a later time. 3. The surveyors drawing of the tract could be substituted for the sketch currently attached to the.proposed Agreement. SIGNED RHA:lee _ t CITY OF tDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO:L/�f e(� W o Uj SUSPENSE DATE: DIRECTOR Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare / letter/memo f/ for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY ASST. CITY ENGINEER BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPT. EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPT. STREET DIVISION SUPT. TREATMENT PLANT SUPT. WATER/SEWER SUPT. COMMENTS: FROM: '//r-- DATE: �� 0 ^FINED June 10, 1977 MEMO TO: Leif R. Larson, P.E. Director of Public Works FROM: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: KAUFFMAN CONTRACT REZONE (FILE #R-2-77) J u N 10 1977 The enclosed contract to rezone Lot 10 Block 59, of Meadowdale Beach, from RS-20 to CW, was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1977 subject to a number of changes. Mr. Kauffman was asked to revise his plot plan by submitting a new plot plan, drawn to scale showing the exact location of the fuel storage tank, and revising the street dedication to more accurately reflect the Official Street Map. John Wallace advises me that the City can ask for a street dedi- cation which conforms to the Official Street Map, since Mr. Kauffman has volunteered this as part of the condition of his contract. The dedication indicated in the contract shows only a 10' dedication on the.west boundary of the lot. Could your office review the contract and recommend any changes that should be incorporated in the final draft of the contract. Please respond no later than June 20. NC/le Attachments: Contract Site Plan CONTRACT REZONE FOR FUEL STORAGE TANK AGREEMENT AND COVENANT between.STANLEY KAUFFMANN.and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, husband and wife, hereinafter known as ."owner" and THE.CITY OF.EDMONDS, a municipal corporation WITNESSETN: WHEREAS., owner is the owner of real property situated in the City of Edmonds,, County of Snohomish, more particularly de- scribed as follows: e-1­A-, Lot.1.0, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish.County, Washington WHERAS.the owner has made.application to the City of Edmonds of a contract rezone from R-2.0 to CW zone for the purpose of instal- ling a gasoline fuel storage tank capable of .storing 5,000 gallons; WHEREAS the owner has offered to tender to the..City. of Edmonds this agreement respecting limitations on the use of the property within the owner's ownership; WHEREAS the covenants and agreement herein are intended to con- stitute the basis for the r.ezone set forth'.above and are intended to be effective from the effective date.of said rezone; WHEREAS the .use of the subject property will have a'substantial relation to the people, land and resources, health, welfare and safety and morals of the citizens of the City of.Edmonds and.the owner.recognizes the need'for the control, cooperation -and securing the proper development of the property to be compatible with the surrounding uses and WHEREAS the City of Edmonds has found and set forth the.file number R-2-77 of the City of Edmonds Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:. 1. The owner agrees -to dedicate 10 feet by 60 feet on the westerly portion of said Lot 10 to the City of Edmonds for street use purposes. .2. The owner agrees to install, pursuant to the specifica-. tions of the City of Edmonds Fire Marshal, a 5,000 gallon gasoline fuel storage tank on said.Lot 10.. Thig -owner further agrees'to bury said gasoline 'storage tank on said Lot 10 and -.to restore the surface of the ground to the -same or similar contour,as now exists and further the owner agrees .not to install any permanent above ground structure in connection with the installation of the fuel storage tank except for the venting and.filling tubes as necessary and as specifiedby. the Fire Marshal.. 3.. That the owner agrees to set aside and use the above described lot solely for the purpose of the underground fuel storage facility and agrees 4.in that connection.not to in;stall.any.above ground structure for any purpose on said property... 4. This agreement is tendered to the City of Edmonds by the present and future owners of the subject property and said agree- ment is hereby accepted.by the City of Edmonds. All parties agree that it is applicable to the parties to this agreement, their heirs, successors, assigns and .future owners or users of the subject pro- perty, both as..to duties and benefits. Owner agrees that this agreement will be specifically enforceable by the City of Edmonds in equity. 5. The City of Edmonds will be under no obligation.to.i-ssue to owner, their successors or assigns, building permits for improve- inents or structures above ground as to the subject property, unless such -improvements -comply substantially with the plot,and plat attached hereto and with applicable.ordinances and with the terms hereof and' the applicable ordinances at the time of the application for the permit. 6.. This agreement and each part of it shall be.considered a . covenant running with the land,covered by this'subject agreement -and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of,the owner and shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor in the. grantor -grantee index, with the owner being listed as grantor and the City of Edmonds as grantee, and all costs of such recording. shall be paid by owner. Payment of said costs shall be a condi-. tion.precedent to exercising any rights under the terms of this. agreement. 7.' The property which -is the subject of said agreement is legally.described as follows: Ramp:e , Lot 10, Block 59, Meadowdale Beach accordingto plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page:38, records of Snohomish_County, Washington. S. This agreement and covenant is conditioned upon said legally, described property being rezoned from R-20 to.CW. 9,. The owner of the above described property shall limit the use of the property to the installation of a 5,000 gallon. gasoline.fuel storage facility. 10. Upon transfer'of the ownership of said property by.sale, descent, inheritance or an otherwise subsequent owner shall be required to meet all conditions contained herein. 11. The owner agrees that in the.event it is necessary for the City of Edmonds to bring legal action to enforce the p'rovi sions of this aggreement,'the owner will pay costs and reasonable attorneys fees,as determined by the. court iri the event the City _ 2 _ 0.4 of Edmonds is successful in the suit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement on this ,� day of I1(i.AV . 1977. OWNER: . Stanley K(if fm Da'in a ayffir ATTESTED: ✓CITY OF EDMONDS: BY City Clerk MAYOR STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY -OF SNOHOMISH) On this day of M A V 1977, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State .of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared STANLE'Y KAUFFMANN and DAPHNE KAUFFMANN, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that .they signed and. sealed the said instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses,and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal her to ffixed "die -day' and = - year in this certificate above written. - ub n t c iand for the State f ashington, residing at GDMo PS STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) s's . COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this day of ,.1977, before me, the undersigned a Notary -Public in and for the State of Washington.,. -duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared , to me known.to be the.Mayor of, -the City of Edmonds*, the municipal. corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses .and purposes therein.mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instru- ment and that the,seal affixed is the corporate seal of the City of Edmonds. 3 WITNESS my.hand and official seal hereto affixed the•day and" year in this certificate above written. Notary Public in and for the State* - "3� of Washington, residing at 5 vw f 511 '•+fit` j,` .. �q�' } q I \4r4 - ra it .0 i A4 CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center Edmond's;:=Washington ,98020 T'glepFione (206) 775-2525 June 10, 1977 . RECEIVFn JUN 10 1977 Mr. Stanley Kauffman. 16111-76th Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98020 CONTRACT REZONE-:FILE.#R-2-77, This is written to advise you of certain change's which should be made -in the Contract Rezone, File ;r1R-2-77, prior to a hearing before the City. Council. The Planning Commission approved, the Contract subject to the following.additions: 1. A.revised site plan, drawn to scale,.showing the exact location of the fuel."storage tank, and all streets and right-of=ways. 2. Revision.of the street dedication on the south west corner of the site per the Official Street Flap and Engineering Division specifications. 3. Addition to the Contract specifying permanent removal of the fuel storage tank on. the Laebugten Wharf. 4. Submittal of a title report. When these items have been received by this Department, they will be forwarded to the City Attorney for preparation of the final Contract, and the rezone will be set -on a City Council . Agenda. In order to install the tank, the following permits will be needed: 1. Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit (application enclosed). 2. Street .Use Permit (consult the Engineering Department). 4 , Mr: Stanley Kauffman June 10, 1977 Page 2 3. Business License for operation of the fuel storage facility. 4. Permit from.the'Fire Department.. If you need further assistance, please contact.Noelle Charleson in the Planning Division. Owl 4. E. JOSEPH WALLI , Director Community Development Department, NC/le Attachm ent CC: Larson John Wallace public buildings, parks, churches, and proposed and existing benches. His -plan proposed 28 additional benches. Mr. Burton said each bench costs approximately $300 to install. He said he had been awaiting input from the senior citizens to see where they felt additional benches should be installed. Councilman Clement commented that there will be covered benches -along the bus routes and they should be taken into consideration before installing new benches. Capt. Floyd Smith of 814 Dayton commented that many of the Metro stops have shelters but not benches. Councilman Carns felt this was a budget item and should be held in abeyance until budgeted. Councilman Gellert thought it was something that was just overlooked, MOTION: and he thought walking should be encouraged. A MOTION WAS THEN MADE BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEMENT, TO INSTRUCT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT A aj,, atla-, RESOLUTIOtl TO TRANSFER $1,800 FROM THE CONTINGENCY FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SIX BENCHES AT THE HIGHEST PRIORITY LOCATIONS, TO BE MUTUALLY :.AGREED UPON BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND SENIOR.CITIZENS GROUP. MOTION'CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMAN CARNS VOTING NO. (Councilman Herb had..advised the Clerk that he would have to leave the meeting for a short period. He left follow- ing this vote, 8:15 p.m., and returned at 8:32 p.m.) STREET USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR SIGN - ROBERT HOLT, 10116 EDMONDS WAY (8:15 p.m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson indicated the applicant wished to place a business sign in a portion of the right-of-way between the back of the sidewalk and the property line, and that the location would not cause interference with utilities MOTION: or driveway sight distances. He said it had been before the Amenities Design Board, and he recommended approval. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, TO APPROVE THE STREET USE PERMIT APPLICATION FROM ROBERT HOLT. MOTION CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMAN HERB NOT PRESENT. REPORT 014 BIDS OPENED MAY 17 FOR PURCHASE OF SIX VEHICLES (8:16 p.m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson reported that two proposals had been received but one had not been accompanied by a bid bond. He had submitted a report of the bids and he recommended award to the bidder who conformed to the contract documents and the State Code. He said the Mayor recommended otherwise, however. Mayor Harrison said the City Attorney had advised him that the bid bond could be waived and that, in addition, this type of material does not have to be purchased by bid. Inasmuch as there was a..substantial amount to be saved by awarding to the bidder who had not submitted a bond, Mayor Harrison felt the City should take advantage of that savings. MOTION: A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEMENT, THAT THE CITY ACCEPT THE BID .OF SEA-TAC FORD TRUCK SALES, INC., FOR ONE 212 T-3N DUMP TRUCK AT THE PRICE OF $12,264 PLUS SALES TAX; AND THAT THE CITY ACCEPT THE BID OF TOM CHAPMAN FORD FOR THE BALANCE OF THE VEHICLES IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,181 PLUS SALES TAX; AND THAT THE COUNCIL WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT OF A BID BOND FROM TOM CHAPMAN FORD. Discus- sion followed regarding the bid bond requirement. City Attorney John Wallace advised that the bid process was not required at all and that a contract could be awarded to purchase the vehicles. He said that if there were concern, all the bids could be rejected and then a contract awarded. It was generally agreed that the bid process should be continued to be used, but that efforts should be made to get the lowest prices and if that could be done without requiring a bid bond it would be better to do it that way. MOTION CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMAN GOULD VOTING NO, AND WITH COUNCILMAN HERB NOT PRESENT. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT AND UTILITY CHARGES - WATER LINE FOR LAEBUETEN' WHARF, INC. (8:30.p..m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson reported that the Laebugten YA arf addition required a new water service for the fire protection system, and a portion of the line lying within the railroad right-of-way will be owned and maintained by the City, so a permit from the railroad for the use of their right-of-way was required. He recommended that the Mayor be authorized to enter .into the Right: -of -Way Use Agree- ment with the railraod. The railroad would charge a customary rental fee, and MOTION: Mr. Larson recommended this, in turn,.should be charged to Laegigten Wharf. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT, THAT THE CITY ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THIS REGARD, THAT THE MAYOR BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE AGREEMENT WIT14 THE RAILROAD, AND EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 - May 24, 1977 THAT LAEBUGTEN WHARF BE CHARGED THE COSTS OF THE RIGHT -OF -!JAY RENTAL PERMIT, PRORATING IT ON THE BIMONTHLY CITY UTILITY BILLING 0 $1.50 PER MONTH FOR THE FIRST FIVE YEARS AND $.85 PER MONTH THEREAFTER. MOTION CARRIED. (Councilman Herb had returned during this discussion.) _ RECOMMENDATION BY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ON ALTERNATIVES FOR PROCEEDING WITH PAVING OF LAUREL WAY - LID 198 (8:34 p.m.) Director of Public Works Leif Larson offered the alternatives of (1) readvertising for bids, hoping to either have reduced bids from the same contractors or to attract new bidders; or (2) proceed, with the City acting as general contractor,, doing a portion of the construction work, and negotiating arrangements with contractors for specialized work, such as curbing and paving. Mr. Larson felt the second alternative was the better one, and he said the City forces could MOTION: handle the project with a minimum adjustment of projected workloads. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN CARNS, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEMENT, THAT THE CITY AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED WITH LID 198 UNDER THE DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDED SECOND ALTERNATIVE, WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REQUESTING PROPOSALS FROM SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS WHERE NECESSARY, COMPLYING WITH STATE LAW FOR REQUIRING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF 'vJORK TO BE DONE. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION WITH STATE HIGH!•lAY DEPARTMENT ON HIGHIWAY 99 IMPROVEMENTS (8:38 p.m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson reported that the District Engineer from the Washington State Highway Department had requested the City of Edmonds to enter into an Agreement for its pro rata share of the channelization work on Highway 99 from 228th St. S.W. to SR 524 in Lynnwood. Mr. Larson explained by memorandum charges that would be made to Edmonds amounting to $19,469.97., Ile said the City could pursue action to avoid participation, but it was not in the best legal position to do that. City Attorney John Wallace added that the State could take the City's !-i gas tax funds to pay for the improvement if the City refused to participate. Mr. Larson recommended the City participate, and his memorandum indicated how funding would be accomplished. Councilman. Carns expressed the view that the State mandates a budget be utilized and it should not be permitted to MOTION: upset the budget halfway into the year. COUNCILMAN CARNS THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT, THATTHE RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC !,lORKS BE FOLLOWED IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THE MAYOR BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED. 7 PROPOSED ORDINANCE REQUIRING APPROVAL OF SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGNS (8:45 p.m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson said this proposed ordinance was for the purpose of more coordinated building permits and control, and for the benefit of the builder or property owner so he does not go to the expense of developing plans and then discover the septic tank permit won't be approved because the soil won't pert. Under the proposed ordinance the septic tank system design must be MOTION: approved prior to receiving a building permit.. He recommended approval. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN HERB, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT, THAT ORDINANCE 1919 BE ADOPTED, REQUIRING APPROVAL OF SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGNS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED DRAINAGE ORDINANCE (8:50 p.m.) Public Works Director Leif Larson recommended approval of the proposed Drainage Ordinance except for the appeals procedure. He had checked with other municipalities and found that the usual procedure on appeal was either to the City Council or the County Commissioners. Mr. Larson felt that the Public Works Director, Mayor, and. City Council are the only ones responsible for budgeting for future maintenance and operations of the accepted public works facilities, so they should not relinquish the authority and final decisions on public facilities to a process which bypasses the elected officials. Community Development Department Director Joe Wallis, however, expressed the view that it is up to the administrators to establish the administrative policy with the appeals to the board. He felt there is merit in relieving the Council of appeal hearings on technical and administrative EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 - May 24, 1977 STREET FILE � • May 24, 1977 ✓'s)a� MEMO TO: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson, Director Public Works Department SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE R-2-77 - LAEBUGTEN WHARF In reference to the proposal for rezoning a parcel upland from the Wharf for the purpose of installing and operating gasoline storage tanks, we have the following comments to make. 1. Mr. Kauffmann has indicated that he wishes to run distribution pipes to the dock under the public street. This will require a Street Use Permit from the City Council. Also, special construction techniques will have to be used to guarantee safety since the material to be piped is flammable. 2. The site has ground water problems interrelated with bad soil conditions. Appropriate measures should be taken to drain the site and to control any tendency of the fuel tanks to float. 3. It is recommended that complete plans be submitted in the form of Building Permit and Street Use Permit applications prior to the City agreeing to any contract for rezoning. This will give the City an opportunity to examine the proposal prior to making final authorizations. 4. The City Fire Chief should review this matter from a fire safety standpoint. We trust this will answer your memo of May 20, 1977. SIGNED RHA : j t cc: Jack Mitchell Abe Blandin S-Z3 Allen TH. in Dt. RECEIVED MAY 2 0 1977 Public works uopt. May 2 0., 1977 MEMO TO: Leif Larson, Director Public Works Department FROM: E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE R-2-77 This is written to request you to review the enclosed. application by Stanley Kauffman for a rezone from RS-20 to CW at'75th and 162nd. This item will be heard by the Planning Commission Wednesday, May 25. In reviewing this application, it appears that Mr. Kauffman plans to connect the tanks at the subject site to the wharf via pipes under the road and the railroad track. If this is the case, will Mr. Kauffman need a street use permit? There are a number of springs on the subject site which may necessitate special installation requirements. Could you review the proposal and address the issues of: 1. Will City engineering standards permit connection of the fuel tanks to the dock by pipes under the City street? 2. Will the tanks, if located where proposed, meet City engineering standards? Could you submit your comments to this office by Tuesday, May 24? NC/mw CITY OF EDMNDS LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Lu � 0 Q H W Q � SUSPENSE DATE: DIRECTOR Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare letter/memo for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY ASST. CITY ENGINEER BUILDING & GROUNDS SUPT. EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPT. STREET DIVISION SUPT. TREATMENT PLANT SUPT. WATER/SEWER SUPT. COMMENTS: (Z •I�s.Z�'0 FROM: DATE: ^L(� t s4. ;��� b'YT�"'? ^�- _ - .. "'"..,. ;�,.. �:�.. �".'^`•tNY:t�ac• .^.sq. ''�i`-a �'..,.:.�_' a•'a-� " „1-•.;.�;t, LV C DATE: s•e� CGrn m��i c �-hc-� FILE CITY OF EDMONDS REZONE FEE; `a75. APPLICATION FOR.REZONE CONTRACT REZONE: C1125.00 HEARING DATE:j-W<< ;?.S ENV, ASSESSMENT FEE:S25.00 �..� APPLICANT:__ 'ENV. CHECKLIST REC' D REC' T NO:. r . ' / 0 ADDRESS ,�� C�S ,� PHONE # APPLICANTS INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY: OPTION HOLDER RE CONNTRACT HOLDER OTHER - Please specjfy:� i OWNER: , ADDRESS: '/ ' i��,� Z i � — � � ,,5 - ,7 ��— / � , L?'lh�d'; rct� P HONE (If more than on ow e-r,% ttach list or .pe.ti tion) ` ' REQUEST REZONE. FROM: ,�: ,:,,� TO: Statement or reasons for r one request Statement may be attached. P1 ase include any plans for development.) % t���� '�c'L, �'�' i�i_ L/ r;� LEGA REQUIRED SUGMITTALS (Must be,submitted at.time of application) 1. Map drawn to scale of the area involved, showing all Orop6rty lines, dimensions, exi.stinc buildings and streets. Indicate Plorth an.d adjacent zoning. 2..Vicinity s.k'etch of the area with subjoct property shaded in. Indicate North and adjaceni.' zoning. 3. Environmen.ta'l Checklist, completed•,'with the $25.00 fee. rdames and addresses .of all.propertyowners within 80 feet. of the boundaries .of the propor•<., rezone site. This space.to be completed by the Planning Department: Legal Description checked and approved by. Date CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify. that the information supplied to .the Cii in thin applicati' is true to'. the best of my . knowledge. . //,� ,. it • mature of.,wner dr Agent i ner RECEIVED APR 2 G 1977 City of Edmonds Community pevel. pop «'`•1� N - ,,r,..r: l,-- � Otis „t.-_ Q, :s 1J,',.�r1, I •{, .,".c-{(I+A_�t� ' �� • � � �,• j ;�� � :• ..1t A �:f ¢,y >'1t; :1 •A.-a•{'n:. - :i�t� �;'�'!i j";. :�•.n `f �.3•bS yl iM 1' .. `S i •i: ' a. .3' .9r-, �.�: 4 IriS ,,i' j, r.. 1 r :•. ,F'. •� t t j'. +qa� i . E,�, c q l - .1 t' - r� - 't.t ; ; 't ' ,t a A. a .i •r, c .t ,�, •.,� .. cop . �. 'vE T a .:�;:• •� - .,,• .., L %2�1 '7,� E�ac� ,;,�•-. �. '! rar, :.,.t`� + ;�od:Y. L N.. a�L .dLL' Z: JI r t•-�';. S�►JVTiJaE' OfZ �Z2 �t,d• n l;fv QI S tr1.15�IP. ? �i01a'1 �• .+• � �•'r �' ,. ;-;+.u-' Sri .'.Y : "c�,ol'�" •it�`'e';rE 1L,;�1 r }; �_' � - ? ,> t�:.; ' ; .,i` 6a•tsal:v:',ISi-+T. trl`rlr"i'�JhE .. .,,; �- �� <; .1Z�,�w., LA .:. R Via,, � .. •V r'. F - � � .+�'r H+�I �. q. `-'.rfe,:p r! .7' - � 1.'-��` � y .� 1. � )�1 � d i ,•�`' fia pr,• - .� ,. - t,; "F .r � •..;.�•� • r,' ,•r tia. � t,��,w, ! (Gig. �'�ia• K'J2%w t2e�aJt...su - '�' ' r`1'1' „",,' `- r 22 L�Id• X 3 p OTC �•r?�' •y e���.; f><r{. 3o►a0.,'TUR�`C..'.o2 14"D1,6r•>< Ib. .... w''. ..�. •i;. ;' ".' `:.f`;.. ,,;,: _' _ � '�,>;�2�' + ;,',�;. ' ' lo. • 6v t:V •' , ' � ', i � � �`•, ;; � ' , .. ''; r ifs .t•.1! .� ,S: G �S�N-r.'MTV •TJgE. -.i�' It' C '� `, �� �� �• I Z 4 .r�' Q�¢r`� �; ; y��:i;r�- � - • . � _ � � � +� .i.�,�.-�°�f'" "j'�1ePy!►�E �'vrs� � -. ' � 1 �� tt•r. 'Q,. ;1 �r ;:; i A f'.'S • �, /•1��a _.1 �It �! j P5,o ' r •i i• ..t: rf. A 1 _ L .h ` s` Ire Y. t y,. - J. .. ' 7L L ✓ L/ •�A '', 1 t ' (•'1 S i . F � . , .O , y �,° : � 1, .;�%'rN y��."i;•e'at�•d � .i f, �n 1 � t•, t�f' ,a. ,( I t' .o ` '` >:• 49 PA, �'•t. •4 1�4:� 1. Y Ct f-. ` .`�, � � •��•• e`h' r�n `.�; M:�'v •��-.C� iPf/"J�C rrU/Y �ir'1 �3; t" y(+ � � � �' _ •A PC '�• :V.` �.t �'r. .��, a �� .. '•�•�• y. 1• I •� r' �'1 M' Ot �`'� =•. 'Ili! � � � �I V Y V � o • rj .. O '4 1 � •.R � ' "./ i �'''. ' ' �� r' . f � 2 r ry SIP — a • �' u o : _ ^'r sh}�'. " {'. .,� ..jl I „� Vd t. � -��s `C• '�.!'r. r ! - �+ lrvd LC-VigI..w�.4' _• '+tr rz `: � ; Gcti�`►.�t�co�T�i � , t =, I o;;�` - - ' ' v�/' F Top• o� :, -- � �; r. ->G•(a-d.�JT`r�_ T _ n I o :G 3 r � `.l 04, 1'' ARE. P�Glt..iT 1 £>•�:. �'r •i. if �, {. ' / �.�•, I � r � �iGyNJ+..jt �''� - —"__ - .,;_,. _.. N' .. .... ....... 1�S'TIALL�••: v�oLls��►IOID � � 5 � �. �.Y• ?' ' INr fi�gy,, _yp�. f.• s: ' :.' •x� ; 4 a ° ' ,;f. ;, ��' Y - -- '> 2rA, V e .. T�P•)_�_._ __.. _�! • �.. �{l�' }� .�r 0 ' a Y . ( Z r #I• �' t _ _ _ LVE ' f...� `s,,►..� ,Y•-� --..__-_ - --'-__- - - r•e t f+ t! �I �,'^ `t' •i 2y r sr. r. rr,, Q . P �J • 1' 7 fe^ � _ , . - �'-_-�•.T-__.. �.Y{��ry�-�2 ° � ;-��; Y f,.. � . •._ A AILA6L.E3E.:. Lo._�;A: 'f - � . � t `�� • i R'7 'r f'�-r.e','w' ! Y' st•r' �- �,a-r'.,+ 1.. .....-?'-• .�s.: \ r a� . > ��. ve - ►11 MY.'E_.-.-�vAL�l�rrt �,��:'�� ; Y,^: -�2;a t � __orJ�c�zc�_ta�• L _,. •, _. •.. � , .. �' y ... Do�{� - � '4 '}.• '�J: .�i';.,��'i �q A• k h t� {L. ' Y 01�I V o l:r e`� "'•;'=.��. � � v>N �E � .' �••• i' � 6 5 ':, z �r�y. I �• I f F : ya � - i rf. IZ S� �T�1�'�-1VT=oFr �/�aL.V6►OQ.� Cpp"l"` F. 'z 1 �-�4 t . S, 1<., ,CSC :•• � .. _ .. ,i J. t f Y1; ��' I � _ ., / 1 � //� +i - ; �, '' ' - .. , �,{�S •a S1iF'.St J "1 ... .. l I. !..��, � � .,�►J � ..� � 2 , !r �1�:1V (rl ,�•:�� td4 -a '�� `' ` �.I�' t. .i ���� +�/ .' ,1�`!t b'.t. � r . ' if I H � ,. � f _ I %/� Gi 1,t •+' •� ,r c / p•gwa ' 11- � .' ' .t,,�F Y .. .. � 1.; ' 1� I r 4'• iL �Q :•�4I✓ �'- 7 s ra / �} t•- � .a'/ �{ •i +� 'r ., .-_. ;,,. a ♦ ,r 5 (/2 �"�', .,., Q�.1� �.�7C�r.Eif�LV.,':�1�7.G. � ,.x.r �.. 'i.�' •� I,.• . .. = ' wr' _ *r, � 1� ( �2 r rC W' }� 1 �y�i ':k'!''-' ¢ ti°W' -^` 1 � fa ��:;" � �`� � r .. � � ,'•! • '1 `�•- .� '� 4 ° � 'cam d• ,�' �� TAII or ' '���1 .� � �• %J. t . �- •� I • /. .i� �,11 x � 'i/n P V�. (°,�..PyJS H � N Es r `Y` r .�C fLL: T�'ge '. I. '•�A�►�+v �. F1 LL' GaP 4_S5Cc bLY• , dPiN' '(C. 5 Q• ;, .t �. Ir ,� ( 5ais Na-rmto 5Tn • E+aw. prpEVI 7uP��-o�vlo.L.Kf•4 "'s� i '� �� .i•� I s.�:.` 1 ., ,_..'TJOT'"Epan LI.AlF�'i`�'512.>C."T'b Jp <'' a• P' A ^-� � .•.�. �, s• ;h. _,_. G:Ov�RN���• .B. .:T �:t�::'.::5ix.E. .P � .. ., .{'-(I t: - '� tt 9 • 1 t � � f• N J M r• L• i ii L_ Oil O t f -•h+•. �f- 'q- i i i. F �i• J FI ^'i �• •� f.• , + •' , v t 'r a. , r. 1vtbJi. r i P fit' o : ,:,, • --�- fi ,..:.� • j' 1`, yiP.. ! �- �•. Yj. • day, . / y Y ....i.::/.:: ♦ �.i,',: y.' 1 . • f . S ! ' •d, :J !. .9 'T•.S i •t-..- ::_V. C(,��,y,r. ...,1 -c. ^C. ` t^'•- .`1 t nl .i' .r !` 'M� ,,t �1?: :F•. "F r. r• :r. �2� "�t1• ,..t�: I'' a'. ^r. Ir `i i•1 '1 t .•..r.. .a..l Fy` vim. ,,c. J r'• { :0 i•• I 'F" i' Ii 1. 1' • 'fir . -t •+d M � j• 0 t 's 'J �+ • 0 :.r •.l - w. q SA. t 1 r' .__ .t• .fit{. a : I v. r'. .� .f i 1�iF r as, 1 ' � ,• t - � y • i 'f d �'r *� ' ' b.• 1 .•�r •r. N, r "s =� .R. � � _ �< < ,. .. .. `•ht ,i:••"•`l•s"► ,;.• ,-.t!';�•• .. ST.Fi:�,' PFTRnT.,�;TJ.M'-'�P .C''. T� 'F .�, MEADOWDALE_ a 1.• I. Z ; F 158 t h. ST S. W. 3/ 6 ..1 ��a �'I,• � � Ali 1,' R 1 _ .. r\' .. _.. _ -.--. s w' Cor G°v't Lot i 1 I JN W Cw Gov t L.ut •7 1 Lr 7 , :5i J S E. or NE. Go ' 7 —52 n 1 IN, ff. \r 9 �i V /o 57 /2Ij I Q. (V /3 79f 70/4� 14 ---�C. /5 Sr _`- - ------- 62 - 64 r 6 B f M.c- --- - - - - - - - ST. -S. '•sw. COE Gov' Lot,9 / } APR ZG Hi city of Comonds Community hovel. C>un� MEMO TO: FROM: STREET FILE 0 � May 24, 1977 E. Joseph Wallis, Director Community Development Department Leif R. Larson, Director Public Works Department SUBJECT: PROPOSED CONTRACT REZONE R-2-77 - LAEBUGTEN WHARF In reference to the proposal.for rezoning a parcel upland from the Wharf for the purpose of installing and operating gasoline storage tanks, we have the following comments to make. 1. Mr. Kauffmann has indicated that he wishes to run distribution pipes to the dock under the public street. This will require a Street Use Permit from the City Council. Also, special construction techniques will have to be used to guarantee safety since the material to be piped is flammable. 2. The site has ground water problems interrelated with bad soil conditions. Appropriate measures should be taken to drain the site and to control any tendency of the fuel tanks to float. 3. It is recommended that complete plans be submitted in the form of Building Permit and Street Use Permit applications prior to the City agreeing to any contract for rezoning. This will give the City an opportunity to examine the proposal prior to making final authorizations. 4. The City Fire Chief should review this matter from a fire safety standpoint. We trust this will answer your memo of. May 20, 1977. RHA : j t cc -:-Jack Mitchell Abe Blandin � *OTREEf FILE v 23 .1977 City of Edmonds Planning Committee Dear Members: It is my desire to place a 5,000 gallon gas tank, $' x 17', on the corner lot 10 of Northfields and Kauffmann property, located on the corner of 75th West and 162nd S.W. in Edmonds, Washington. The tank will be placed 2 feet below the surface of the ground,.with•no visual change of the lot surface. I would plan to dedicate 10 feet of the south and west side for future widening of the street. RECENED jg� 2 A 1977 City of Edmonds CommLI.nity Devel. DeQt- . 6f My desire is for a conditional use permit, riot a rezoning in the area. I also do not want the.land zoned spot commercial. With a 5,000 gallon tank instead of the present one of 1,000 gallon we would have less deliveries and cause less change of fire hazzards. Sincerely, Stan rauaf-fo n Laebugten Wharf Pres. r� MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: * STREET Harve H. Harrison Mayor FILE Leif R. Larson, P.E. Director of Public Works 0 .0 May 17, 1977 RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT AND UTILITY CHARGES - WATERLINE FOR LAEBUGTEN WHARF, INC. The Laebugten Wharf addition requires a new water service for the fire protection system. Since a portion of the line lying within the railroad right-of-way is to be owned and maintained by the City, it is necessary that the City obtain a permit from the railroad .for the use of their right-of-way. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to enter into the Right -of -Way Use Agreement (attached). The railroad is charging a rental fee of $75.00 for the first five (5) years and $25.00 for each subsequent 5-year period. This charge is the customary rate levied by the railroad for such agreements. However, it is an uncommon charge necessitated solely by the conditions surrounding Laebugten Wharf. It is, therefore, recommended that the costs of this permit be charged to Laebugten, prorated on the bimonthly City utility billing of $1.50 per month for the first five (5) years and $ .85 per month thereafter. The Mayor and Council's concurrence on this charge is requested. SIGNED RHA:lee Attachment / l 1. CJ �v �L STREET FILE ! • • APPLICATION FOR PIPE LINE PERMIT BURUNGTON NORTHERN To BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. Date February R, 1977 1. At what City or Village is permit desired? Edmonds, Washington 2. Full name and address of Applicant City of Edmonds, Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington 98020 3. If Applicant is a corporation, in what state incorporated? _ If an individual, under what firm name is business conducted? If partnership, give name of all partners 4. Product to be handled in pipe line potable water 5. Pipe Data: .CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE a. Outside diameter 9.05" N/A b. Inside diameter 8.39" N/A c. Pipe material cast iron N/A d. Specifications and grade AMA CL.150 CM- CL. 2) N/A e. Wall thickness 0.33" N/A CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE f. Actual working pressure 125 psi N/A g. iTypeofjoint. -2�tdn Tne - •- N/A h. Coating None WA i. Method of installation Direct burial N/A j. Will cathodic protection be provided? NO NIA 6. a. Depth of pipe under track (top of tie to bottom of casing) N/A b. Angle of crossing 7. If pipe is to be placed longitudinally with track, give a. location of pipe in relation to centerline of nearest track SPP rpfPrPnrP nl an b. depth of coverage (ground line to top of pipe) i fP.P.t 8. If installation is to be by jacking or boring method give location of jacking and receiving pits a. Depth b. Distance facing wall of pit to centerline of nearest track (measured normal) /W 9. Reference plans (to be forwarded with on anal application) a. Drawing Number 11-0724, 1 Of b. Prepared by Sentry Automatic Sprinkler Co. Applicant agrees that if installation requires any or all of the following work; removal and replacement of track, bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging, engineering and/or supervision; such work is to be performed by railway employes and the cost borne by Applicant. if in the opinion of the Railway. Company sufficient hazard is involved the Applicant will be required to furnish liability and property damage insurance in form and amounts satisfactory to Burlington Northern. By (Applicant) (Title) RECOMMENDATIONS: (If additional space is required attach supplemental sheet) Date 19 APPLICATION APPROVED: (Superintendent) (Asst. Vice President —Operations) (General Manager Leases) FORM 16002 1-73 w-Qnsn (Regional Manager Engineering) Printed in U.S.A. OF PIPE LINES RAILWAY RIGHT AY CO*UC • GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Pipe lines under railway tracks or across or along railway right of wdy shall conform to current American Railway Engineering Association Specifications if constructed in the United States and shall conform to current regulations regarding pipe line crossings under railroad as issued and amended by the Board of Transport Commissioners for Canada if constructed in Canada or where laws or orders of public authority prescribe a higher degree of protection than specified herein, then the higher degree of protection so specified shall be adhered to. Plans and specifications for proposed installation sharl be submitted to railway division superintendent and meet the approval of the railway company before construction is begun. Plans shall be drawn to scale showing the relation of the proposed pipe line, angle of crossing, location of valves, railway survey station, right of way line and general layout of tracks and railway facilities. Plan should also show a cross-section (or sections) from field survey, showing pipe in relation to actual profile of ground and tracks, complete description of material to be used, and location of jacking and receiving pits. If open cutting or tunneling is necessary, details of sheeting and method of supporting tracks or driving -tunnel should be shown. The execution of the work on the railway right of way, including the supporting of tracks, shall be subject to the inspection and direction of the Regional Manager Engineering of the Railway Company, Pipe lines shall be installed under tracks by boring or jacking if practicable. Boring excavation must not exceed the outside diameter of the pipe. Jacking or boring of corrugated metal pipe, cast iron pipe or pipe with flanges, bells or couplings will not be permitted. Pipe lines shall be located, where practicable, to cross tracks at approximately right angles thereto but preferably at not less than 45 degrees and shall not be placed within a culvert, under railway bridges or closer than 45 feet to any portion of any railway bridge, building or other important structure, except in special cases and then by special design as approved by the Assistant Vice President Engineering of the Railway Company. Pipe lines laid longitudinally on railway right of way shall be located as far as practicable from any tracks or other important structures. Pipe lines carrying flammable products or products under pressure located within 25 feet of the centerline of any track or where there is danger of damage from leakage to any bridge, building or other important structure, shall be encased or of special design as approved by the Assistant Vice President -Engineering of the Railway Company. Pipe lines laid longitudinally on the railway right of way, 50 feet or less from the centerline of track shall be buried not less than 4' 6" from the ground surface to top of pipe. Where pipe line is laid more than 50 feet from the centerline of track, minimum cover shall be 3 feet. If additional tracks are constructed in the future, or Railway Company determines that roadbed should be widened, the casing shall be extended correspondingly. PIPE LINES CARRYING FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES This includes oil, gas, gasoline, petroleum products or other flammable or highly volatile substance under pressure. APPROVED CASING PIPE: Steel or Cast Iron for all pressures. ALL MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MEASURED NORMAL TO ( OF OUTSIDE TRACK } 25' Min. (Casing Pipe Sealed< } 25' Minimum (Casing Pipe sealed) 45' Min. (Casing Pipe Open) a ¢ 45' Minimum (Casing Pipe open) 45' >a0 U) Q U I Vents to be at or outside R/W line Minimum p Y i cc r~— 45' Minimum I Standard A.R. E.A. pipe IILL z Q ELF- I Standard A.R.E.A. pipe line sign line sign O 2' Toe of slope *1� Ditch line +� I MIN. ( I MIN. 3' MIN . 56 . 4' 6" MIN' " MIN. T- . 3' MIN. IC_-----______________________(__ SIAL CASING PIPE (See table for minimum wall thickness) SEAL/ CARRIER PIPE TO MEET CURRENT A.R.E.A. SPECIFICATIONS Inside diameter of casing pipe shall exceed outside diameter of carrier pipe by 2" for carrier pipe less than 8" diameter, 3%" for 8" to 16" carrier pipe and 41/2" for carrier pipe greater than 16" diameter. PIPE LINES CARRYING NON-FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCES This includes steam, water or any non-flammable substance which from its nature or pressure might cause damage if escaping on or in the vicinity of railway property. Sewers and drains do not require casing pipe unless conditions exist which will endanger security of track, but should be of sufficient strength to withstand E-72 railway loading. APPROVED CASING PIPE: Steel or Cast Iron for all pressures. Reinforced Concrete or Corrugated Metal for pressures less than 100 P.S.I. ALL MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MEASURED NORMAL TO t OF OUTSIDE TRACK } V cc U Q� 1.5D+12' ZcrFes- 1-1— 25' M 1 N. O= zlQ I 3' MIN. wa LLZ0 �, ��w O OtL¢ '1 too I,- `I I J CASING PIPE FOR E 72 LOADING WALL THICKNESS FOR STEEL CASING PIPE (MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 35,000 P.S.I.) PIPE COATED OR PIPE NOT DIAMETER OF CATHODICALLY COATED OR PIPE PROTECTED CATHODICALLY INCHES MIN. THICKNESS MIN. THICKNESS INCHES INCHES 0.188 0.188 UNDER 14 0.219 0.282 14 AND 16 0.250 0.312 18 0.281 0.344 20 0.312 0.375 22 0.344 0.406 24 0.375 0.438 26 0.406 0.469 28 AND 30 0.438 0.500 32 0.469 0.531 34 AND 36 0.500 0.563 35,40 AND 42 CAST IRON PIPE: Installation must be by open trench. Pipe shall conform to American Standards Ass'n. Specification A21 class 150 for 12" and under and class 250 for over 12". Pipe to have mechanical joints or compression couplings. REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE: Pipe shall conform to current A.S.T.M. C-76 table IV, wall "B". CORRUGATED METAL PIPE: Pipe shall be galvanized, asbestos bonded and asphalt coated. Gage of Metal Diameter of before galvanizing pipe U.S. Std. gage (Inches) 14 18 and under 12 24, 30, and 36 10 42 and 48 LL _ O J v w I~ Where the ends of the casing are below ground 2' 0 4'6" 5'6" D MO they shall be suitably protected against the an- �AIN. MIN. MIN. T- trance of foreign material, but shall not be tightly 3' MIN. sealed. CASING PIPE (See table for minimum wall thickness) Where the ends of the casing are at or above ground surface and above high water level they may be left open, provided drainage is afforded in such manner that leakage will be -conducted away from railway tracks or structures. CARRIER PIPE TO MEET CURRENT A.R.E.A. SPECIFICATIONS Inside diameter of casing pipe shall exceed outside diameter of carrier pipe, joints or couplings by 2" for carrier pipe less than 6" in diameter•and 4" for carrier pipe 6" in diameter and larger. • KREET FILE • • CITY of EDMONDS CiviC Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 Office of the City Engineer February 8, 1977 Burlington Northern King Street Station 303 South. Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 Attention: D. H. Burns, Superintendent Gentlemen: SUBJECT PERMIT FOR EDMONDS WATERLINE AT LAEBUGMN WIIARF In regard to your letter of December 15, 1976, attached is the City of Edmonds Permit Application and a copy of the Waterline Plan prepared by. Sentry Automatic Sprinkler Company for Laebugton Wharf, Inc. The waterline is being constructed by Laebugton Wharf, Inc., as a requirement for water service to the wharf. addition. Upon completion.and.inspection of the system, the City will assume ownership and maintenance of the portion up to.and including the meter. ,Laebugton Wharf, Inc.,.will have maintenance and operation responsibility from the meter tothe building. We are, therefore,. requesting this permit to conform .to your requirements although the line is being.constructed by. Laebugton Wharf, Inc. . It is our understanding Laebugton Wharf; Inc.,,wishes to proceed. immediately with the construction. Your approval of this procedure would be appreciated. Yours verytruly, LE I F R. LARSON , P F, .. Director of Public Works RI IA: lee Enclosures s t. C.E. ate n.Sec.' ate SENTRY AUTOMATIC IN VMR CO. RECEIVED 1106 54th Aven ast TACOMA (FIFE). WASHINGTON 98424 F E B 3 119I7 Tacoma (206) 922.6644 LftwidS flit, fl?Rt Seattle (206) 838-9050 To C.ZTY 0/7 6—, 0Mb AV 0 S ' STREET FILE L � T = OF TRANSIYIITTAL AN011 J •�ro j w GENTLEMEN: — . WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Z -2-1b THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted 1K_As requested - ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: if enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. FORM 240-2 - Available from jn a Townsend, Mass. 01469 '0 STREET FILE '* 0 -P, 'Y11. BURLINGTON NORTHERN King Street Station 303 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 SUPERINTENDENT Telephone (206) 624-1900 City of Edmonds December 15, 1976 Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 File: Edmonds T-1375 Attention: Mr. Leif R . Larson, P . E . , Chief Engineer Gentlemen: Reference.is made to your letter dated December 6, 1976, regarding the City of Edmonds' portion of water main to serve Laebugton Wharf in Edmonds, Washington. Enclosed is Burlington Northern Inc. application and you are requested to complete and return to this office with print showing your proposed connection We will then handle with our other interested departments and permit will be issued you. If it is necessary for you to construct prior to issuance of formal permit, we can give advance authority after application has been received by our Regional Engineering Department and reviewed. Yours very truly, RECtl rl 19�6 D . H . Burns DEC Superintendent Eo�ands U0I Dept^ By: Mrs. B . Robinson Att . CITY 01- EDMONDS. ENGINEERIN(I DEPAR'.rMENO . APPLICATION FOR R1�31IT-OF'4AY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT STREET%E. to Cc-7rZete -A & E c,zd' Submt to Pur)Z:,C.te) RECEINED' Permit to be is -rued to:, Sentry -A-utoma tic Sprinkler Coinpap� Gilds 'For work at: (address or vicinity) 16111 76th Place West Type of work to be done: Install 8", Fire Service D UCT I L (Attach Drawing? -,lien Applicable) —Underground and across roadway (Plan Attached) (SUbjec —Con tractor's Discre 3-on) Time Required Start: Finish: -P 11/22/76 4 days later --r 0wher:_J.aab_ugton Wharf, Inc - Name 16111.- 76th Place West Mailing Address Edmonds,, WA (206), 743.-2211 City State Telephone Number Contractor: Sentry I Sprinkler z0; nkler CoCQ. - 02 414) ,Ailtomatic Name State License Number 1106 54th Avenue East Mailing Address Tacoma WA 922-6644 -(2-06) City Stat.e Telephone Number INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application,agrees to hold the City of Edmo * nds harmless from any injuries, damages. or. claims of any, kind or ' description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be,made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of.its.departments or employees,, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings.including defense costs, court costs, and'attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is resoonsible,for workmanship and materials for a 'period of one year following the final inspection and, acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Department. 'Work subject to Inspection and r'estoration'in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by the Engineering Department. Call 775-2525. Sentry AutomAtic Sprinkler Co. Signature: oz Novemberll, 1976 Owner or Aginit. Date Signed Executive -Vice -President C. DO NOT VIR I'TE. BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agencj) Perm Issued (Date) Permit Number d7to -.2 S 4t Fee 000 Bond: Woolf Time Authorized: OE,.,GT L . N Ir', JE, III S AP I, P o VAL DATE IL-) 19' t 16 .ngr. Dept. �.. • .• CITY of EDMONDS Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 . ..Office of the City Engineer November 24, 1976 Sentry Automatic Sprinkler'Company 1106.. 54th Avenue East Tacoma, Washington 98400 Attention: Edward Ilolmes SUBJECT: SPRINKLER' SYSTnI IN RI0IT-OF- WAY AT LAEBUGTEN IAA IART Dear. Mr. Holmes In reference to your application for permit to construct the fire'sprinkler connection in the public --right-of-way, please be advised.of the following: 1) The permit granted by Burlington.Northern Railroad to Laebugten. Wharf does not grant to the. City the right to own and maintain the. portion of system under our maintenance responsibility. .Under paragraph 7 of that agreement, the permi.tee must have written•con- sent of the Railroad to transfer or -assign the permit.. At the present time, the City -is not agreeable to paying continuous permit fees for this installation. . 2) As marked on the site plan, a gate valve i.s` required at the Ste" junction between the existing hater main and the proposed- extension. �CVIs1�i This is necessary for testirig.and controlling the system. 3) A tee is renuired for future extension where the water .main makes a 90 degree bend toward the Wharf meter pit.. 4) All construction'of the water system up to the meter'.pit must conform to the City requirements as outlined in the 1975 APIJA' Specifications. 5.) Refer to previous reviews on these proposals. Upon completion or revision of the above items, we will review the plans .for consideration of issuance of the right-of-way permit. Yours very truly, CITY, OF: _E1V0NDS,•. 1 - LELF'R. LARSON, P.E. City ) ngineer RI 1A: mj 141ECEIVED N 0 V 4P5 1976 BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Edmonds Engr. Dept. 176 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 298-2121 June 21, 1976 Re: Station: Edmonds, Washington Permit No.:] 220,009. Date: June 1, 1976 Purpose: 8-1/4 inch water pipeline Rental: $75.00 first 5 years Mr. Stanley.R. Kauffman, President . Laebugton Wharf, Inc. 16111-76th Place West . Edmonds, Washington 98020_ Dear Mr. Kauffman: In accordance with.your application, we. -are -pleased to enclose;.in. duplicate, the above mentioned agreement.. Both.copies of theagreement must be executed on .behalf of your, company, in the presence of witnesses, and returned for execution on behalf of Burlington Northern. One fully executed copy will be returned to you for your record. Will you also kindly forward your check to.cover the rental as specified.in the agreement. Very truly yours, A. W. Grauel' GEneral Manager.Leases. 7 - e�llw_^ \J. W. Recktenwald Lease Representative Encl. Pipe Line No. 22.2, 00.9 THIS. AGREEMENT, made this lot day of June 1976 between. 21 ► 2XQ qURL NGT N NORTHERN INC. a. Delaware cor orati n, hereinafter called "Railroad,"and :{;ai�biAgto>�t ilP©rstloA�, whose post office address is Z6 u1 " 76th l�,aCe We at � SdAtonda, . W&O.1 li�t04 hereinafter called "Permittee." WITNESSETH: :Railroad; for and in consideration of the fee herein provided to be paid to it by Permittee and'of the covenants and :- romises hereinafter made to be observed and performed by Permittee, does hereby. grant to Permittee license and. permission ' to excavate for, construct, maintain and operate ; �1E< ®, i.l�Oh Msti#xil�l>14s, hereinafter referred to as .the "facility,' upon, along or across the right of way of Railroad, underneath the surface thereof, and under the tracks of its railroad; as the case may be, at or near $iX,IMotids Station, in the County of �$Qhpl�ish , State of �iiah�.A��}49 . , to be located as follows; to wit: :At .Ru:'v�ly •i�af� p QS u I fd' - :1ti}a lost.•, 2,1 Pluax :as shown.colored red.on the'plat hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", dated X&Y 119 1976 e . and by .`this reference thereto.made•a'parf hereof. Permittee in consideration of such license and permission hereby:covenants and promises as follows: 1: Permittee will pay in advance to Railroad for this permit the sum of nev• my+rive 9o11sr' A ��P75.O.A tQx:.t>�be..fir>lit 'ive year yerioo and 'rRN�IQt Vivo Dollars (425.00 for, each x th1►t this 'agrsepot ay. ;roma4ps In effect; sutis+e�usmt #"i,F�1 y4as s also. all taxes and assessments that may be levied or assessed against said facility.- Railroad reserves the right to change the said charge at any timewh0e this permit remains in effect:upon, thirty (3O) days' written notice. This provisiomfor payment shall in noway restrict Railroad's right of termination under Paragraph 9 hereof. 2.. Permittee, at Permittee s sole cost and expense,.shall excavate for, construct, reconstruct, maintain and repair the ' •facility placing the same in accordance with,the specifications provided in'application dated April 69 1976s .heretofore'e 'proved by.the:Railroad's'Regional Manager Engineering.' Permittee shall fill in the excavation, and restore tha surface of the ground to its previous condition 'subject to the approval of the Superintendent of the Division of Railroad upon which the facility is located. Said Superintendent shall have I a the right at any time when in his judgment it becomes necessary or advisable, to require any material used in the work to be replaced with like material or with material of a more permanent character; also to require additional work or change of location of said facility, as a m,atter•of safety, or of appearance, or on account of additional tracks being laid, change of grade -thereof, construction of.a building, or for any other reason whether or not connected with the operation, maintenance, or improvement of the railway `of Railroad, all of which shall be done at the expense of Permittee in the manner herein provided. r 3. Permittee shall give to the said Superintendent at least two (2) days' advance notice of,any work to be done by. Permittee in the excavation; construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location or removal of the facility, and shall conduct such work in such manner as not to interfere with the maintenance and operation of the railway of Railroad. . for the protection of its property and operations, does any t the request of Permittee or o p P P Y P n that Railroad a , 4 In the event q work, furnishes any material or flagging service, or incurs any expense whatsoever on account of the excavation for, construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, removal of the facility or otherwise, Permittee shall reimburse Railroad for the cost thereof within twenty (20) days after bills are rendered therefor. If the excavation for construction, any reconstruction, maintenance, repair, change of location, or removal of the facility, requires any or all of the following work: -removal and replacement of track, bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging; engineering' and/or supervision, such work 'is tobe performed by Railroad employees and the cost borne by Permittee: 5;I` In the event any cathodic electrolysis or other electrical grounding system is installed in connection with the facility which; in the opinion of Railroad, in any way interferes with any train signals, telephone or telegraph lines, or other facilities of Railroad; Permittee upon being informed by Railroad of such interference shall forthwith discontinue operation of and remove said grounding system, or take such steps as may be necessary to avoid and eliminate all such interference. Permittee further agrees to indemnify, and save harmless Railroad from and against any damages, claims, losses, suits or expenses in any manner arising from or growing out of interference with the signals, telephone or telegraph lines of Raoroad'by the operation, use or existence of any sueh`grounding system. 6. Permittee` shall and' hereby releases and discharges Railroad ''of and -from any and all 'liability for damage to or destruction of the said. facility, and any other property of Permittee located on or near Railroads premises; and shall and hereby assumes`iihV�and•aWliability for injury to or death of any and all persons whomsoever, including officers, employees and agents of,the'parties liereto',-or loss of or damage to property to whomsoever belonging; ihcluding property owned by, leased to or in the Bare, custody and control of the parties hereto, in any manner arising from or during the construction, any reconstruction, use; 'maintenance, repair or removal of said facility, however such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aforesaid may occur or be caused; and shall and hereby does indemnify and save harmless Railroad of and from any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, damages, recoveries, judgments, costs or expenses arising or growing out of or in connection with any such injury, death, loss, damage or destruction aforesaid. Permittee further agrees to appear and defend in the name of Railroad any suits or actions at.law brought against it on account of any such personal injuries, death or damage to property, and to pay and satisfy any final judgment that may be rendered against the Railroad in any such suit or action. The liability assumed by Permittee herein shall not be affected or diminished by the fact, if it be a fact, that any such suit or action brought against Railroad may arise out of negligence of Railroad, its officers, agents, servants or employees, or be contributed to by such negligence. Notwithstanding th$ for*going, ' nothing herein COn- taincd .,i :poi fit': a.as + e$, ;R,g. ll►n. iod�e ait3� i� oA .sga.ie,�4 that .dole nagii- gena�. of ]t ilroads itIffi 'offiaesag employees or agenta. 7. Permittee shall not transfer or assign this permit without the written consent of Railroad. 8. Nothing herein contained shall imply or import a covenant on the part of Railroad for quiet enjoyment. 9. It is expressly understood. and agreed that Railroad may at any time cancel and terminate this license and permission by giving 11 to Permittee'thirty 00►°days' notice in writing of its intention to can the same and at the expiration of such noticq this license and per shall terminate.- Upon receipt of such notice and before the expiration thereof, Permittee, under the supervision and direction of the said Superintendent, or his authorized representative, shall remove the facility from the right'of way of Railroad and restore the right of way and premises of Railroad in a manner and to such condition as shall be satisfactory to the said Superintendent of. Railroad. If Permittee shall fail to remove the facility and restore the said right of way to such condition within said thirty (30) day period, Railroad at its option may remove the same and restore the said right of way to. its.previous condition, and Permittee shall pay the cost and expense thereof to Railroad. 10. Upon .any .failure of Permittee. punctually and strictly to observe and perform, the covenants and promises made .' herein.by.Permittee to be kept and performed, Railroad may terminate this agreement on ten (10) days" notice to Permittee,' remove the facility, and restore the right of way.to its previous condition at.the cost and expense of Permittee. 11. Any, notices given under the provisions of this agreement shall be good if deposited postpaid in a United States post office addressed to Permittee at Permittee s post office address above stated or as otherwise directed by Permittee. . 12. The license and permission herein granted is subject to permits, leases and licenses, if any, heretofore granted by Railroad affecting the premises upon which said facility is located. Form 60025 4-74 TO Engineering Planning FORM 41 - LITTLE'6 INTIOLOFFICE COMMOCATONS STREET FIL DATE August. 31 1976 FROM Building C SUBJECT: Laebugten Wharf, Inc. Permits for your review (i .g. 16111-76th Place West This is an application for permit renewal. There are two (2) permits involved, one for the pier and.one (1) for the shed.. A copy of the original permit is attached for your reference. Elul Har' cutt HW/ae enc. 4 �� hoc/ MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TP'c,Et FLE *MW Harry Whi tcutt Building Official Richard H. Allen Assistant City Engineer Fire Sorink May 25, 1976 In reference to Sentry Automatic Sprinkler Company's plans dated April^'9, 1976, we have the followings comments: 1. The meter pit is shown to be located within the right- of-way of Burlington Northern Railroad. Prior to the,City's release of a permit foi* this installation `the City must have in its hands a permit obtained from the Burlington Northem Rail- road. 2. It is recommended that the extension of the City water main be run northerly from its,present location and thence westerly to the dock. This installation would reduce head losses and ale. eliminate two 90ddegree ells. 3. At the point where the fire line runs westerly from the r existing water main, an 8-inch tee should be installed so that the City can extend the water main in the street northerly at a future date. 4. All piping up to the meter shall be. Ductile Iron and the installation shall conform to the 1975 APVA Specifications. 5. A permit is required from the City Engineer for excavation within the public right-of-way. RHA:mjr APPLICATION FOR P' BURUPNGThN E%"=N=HffW To BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. ate 1. At what City or Village Is,peimit desired? FAATMCIS t 2. Full name at�tL �tldress � /�opI t lae� ton W1arf, r Inc.3 b 11 a ce s__ Q n 3. It Applicant is a corporation, in what state incorporated? _ If an individual, under what firm name is business conducted?. If partnership, give name of all partners 4. Product to be. handled in pipe line Fire Proteeticn .Water 5: Pipe Data: (8, 625) CARF*IER PIPE CASING PIPE a. Outside diameter 15J) - 7m_20.0 b. Inside diameter c. Pipe material �r •a1 St�1 d. Specifications . ASIM A53-72a and grade & . ASTM A120-72a A-53 e. Wall thickness �• 18$ _ _ 0..375 In. .MAY 3 19;s s RL6, 1 6 _ 1976 OG CARRIER PIPE' CASING PIPE f. Actual working pressure.125 g• Type of joint . h., Coating ' Zing; (hmnat-p Tn�xt•aa al>ri� IAITsa i. Method of installation—d�ZluaA �syx-�n� i3� T�k_ J. Will cathodic protection be provided?- r]p 6.. d Depth of pipe under track (top of tie to bottom of Casing) 71 2tt IMA,.�...jm) act b. Angle of crossing t4 7. If pipe is to be placed longitudinal?. ith track, give �8 Pipe t ductile. irm, C�.8. s I Witt? Cathodic prote'ctim atad .tit' blocking. a. location of t % i°� `°`'a`'�'+b• pipe in re ation to centerline of nearest track b. depth of coverage (giound line to top of pipe) 41 6rt h4Lninrttm ' NSA 8. If installation is to be by 'acking or boring method give location of Jacking and r pits a. Depth 71. 611� initnml b. Distance facing wall of pit to centerline of nearest track (measured. normal) 25 -0' 9. Reference plans (to be forwarded with original application) a. Drawing Number 1 Of 3 b. Prepared.by stty Q"; '50mix- Applicant agrees that if installation r@quires any or all of the (OfloW/np,work; removal and rep/ecerriont of track, bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by mrk or ficl lOng, enginawing andlor'supervision; such work /s to be performed by railway employes, and the cost by Applicant. if in. the opinion of the Railway Company sufficient hazard is involved the Appfi , nt will be r "red to fur ish /lability and property dwnaye in surertce in form and amounts satisfactory to Burlingt rthern By t ITille) RECOMMENDATI S: (If additional we i required attach supplemental sheet) Date — 19 APPLICATION APPROVED: (Superintendent) (Asst. Vice President• -Operations) (General Manaanr Leases) (Regional Manager Engineeringt F nNM 16fK1! I •'/3 Printed in U.S.A. • STREET FILE TLC OF EDMONDS COUNCIL WORK P1EETING• August 12, 1975 R E C E F` D AUG 5 1975 ROLL CALL Edruilds Engr. Dept. The regular work meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order by Mayor Harve Harrison at 7:30 P.M. All council members were present, except Clement.. Councilman Gellert said that he was asked by Councilman Clement to say that something came up at. the last minute so that he could not be here this evening. Councilman Clement said also that he will be on vacation the following two weeks. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the council me&tinq held on August 5th had been posted, mailed and distributed, and with no omissions nor corrections, were approved as written. CITATION FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Mayor Harrison announced that the city has received a citation for pedestrian safety from the American Automobile Association. He said we have received this several times and it will be placed on the bulletin board. The Mayor displayed -the plague to .the council. The Mayor said that it had been,suggested that items 4 and 5 on the agenda be turned around, so that the Amenities Desion Board mem- MOTION: bers can hear the discussion on the Laebugten matter. Councilman Sellert moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson to reverse items 4 and 5 on the agenda. Motion carried. FURTHER EXPLORATION & DISCUSSION Of l_PEBUGTEN MATTER City Attorney, John Wallace, explained that the basis of this meeting r' was to explore whether there is a common ground that can be reached ✓� for -resolution of this matter short of completion of the litigation,. For that purpose it coincided with the Amenities Desinn Board rr.embers being invited to attend the meeting. Notices had been sent to the property owners that appealed from the Amenities Design Board decision, Mr. Kauffmann and his attorney, Mr. Pierson. Mr. Wallace said that no decision could be made at the meeting, it is simply to explore alter- native methods of construction, or any other alternatives that will satisfactorily resolve the dispute. The City Attorney said the hearing will be conducted with the stipulation that none of the discussion with the council, the Board, or adjoining property owners wi11 be used or referred to in the litigation presently on file with the Snohomish County Superior Court, or any future litigation- ('r. Pierson had pre- viously agreed to this stipulation and Mr. Wallace asked him to reaf- firm, which he did. He also stated that the councilmen who had previously disqualified themselves were told that they could participate as no decision is to be made and none of the evidence can be used in any way by either side in the court proceedings presently pending, or which might arise from the subject matter before the council. Mr. Pierson, counsel for Mr. Y,auffriann, again agreed to the stipulation that none of the discussion this evening will be used in the present litigation or any subsequent action. He said that this is an effort .by the owners to attempt to work out a solution. He asked for the mockup of the building, and this was brought in. Mr. Pierson said that - this hearing was precipitated by a contact with one of the objecting property owners, and that discussion had centered around .two possible re -designs of the building. He also indicated that they would like MOTION: to have as much input as possible. Councilman Gellert moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson to suspend the rules for this item and allow audience participation. Motion carried. Attorney Pierson reviewed the ownership of the wharf by '1r. Kauffmann, who was later joined by 0 Mr. Wills in the enterprise. The proposed building is desioned to store 200 boats in lengths from 19' - 23' in four tiers, as compared to 46 boats being stored in the existing building. They commenced their effort to acquire the construction permit and the necessary Shorelines Management Permit in May of 1972. Wright Construction Company, the building supplier, entered the picture in January of this year. Copies of a letter to Mr. Pierson from Wright Construction were supplied to the council. The letter explained the work done to date on this project. Mr. Pierson said the building is 86' wide by 251' long and is 31'6" to the crown of the roof. He said their purpose is to see if some re -design of the building can serve 'to satisfy both members of the council a.nd,the ob- jecting property owners. The discussion with Mr. Kauffmann and a repre- sentative of the objecting property o,:m ers resulted in two desion sug- gestions. One suanestion was a cantilevered roof and the other was vertical cedar siding on the south and east sides. Cantil'everinq the roof would require complete re -design of the building and dock, with a heavier supporting structure needed for the increased load. Mr. Pierson invited comments from council or members of the audience. Councilman Anderson asked Fir. Kauffmann to speak to the possibility of removing the old building. Mr. Kauffmann said that within five years the dock has to be replaced. He said the project.is to completely remove the old building and eventually have two new buildings. The original design of the new building and the final design shown on the mockup were discussed. The original had a simulated gable done with the use of paint. Keith Goldsmith, said that he did not think the application of wood had anything to do with compatibility, but that the Amenities Design Board was primarily concerned with breaking up this huge mass with some shadows and interest. John LaTourell said that the canti- levered roof proposed this evening was one of the first suggestions made by the Amenities Design Board to Laebugten and it was rejected. Mr. Pierson said the engineers have pointed out that if they did that they would have to start the whole permit process over again as they would have to raise the roof line. He said this could delay the project from one to two years, and felt this was an unreasonable risk to ask the applicant to undergo. Margaret Bernhoft, also from the Amenities Design Board, said she would concur with the other members of the Board. She said it had been their understanding that the cantilevered roof could not be done. A lady in the audience read a letter from ,Joann M. Anderson' in which she urged that an architect be hired to solve the problems of attractiveness and compatibility. Norma Nelson said it seems that Mr. Kauffmann has gone out of his way to perform all'the things required. A gentleman residing at 16220 - 75th P1. W., said that if the old building is to be removed eventually, they could come up with a better design. Cliff Lawson, 16221 - 75th Pl. W., said that the primary objection of the residents that appealed the Amenities Design Board decision, was that they felt the Board did not make the right decision as the building is not compatible with the old structure. 'Ile pointed out that this involves an addition to an existing facility. He said that these two buildings are not in harmony; and theat the dictionary says harmony means "a oneness of the whole". Donna Crawford, 15824 - 75th P1. W., said'that she and her husband do not object to a boat storage facility, but would like to see an architect hired to make something very attractive out of this, and that they are confident that it could be done. Further discussion followed. Mr. Kauffmann said that very few architects work for less than 9 - 10% of the project cost and he does riot believe he needs one. City Planner, ,Joe !allis, who is a registered architect, said he knows several architects that would work on a consultant basis at a straight hourly fee. Mr. Kauffr:ann asked to have one of them call him. During further discussion the Building Official, Harry Whitcutt, said that presently the building permit has been denied because the building is 35' not 31'6". fie said that will have to be taken care of before the permit is issued. Mr. Whitcutt said the dock permit is ready to issue, but that they have been advised not to issue any permits. Ed Hayes, a Planning Commission member, urged the council to come to some /kind of compromise as he feels Mr. Kauffmann has met all requirements. More discussion followed, but the matter was not resolved. A recess followed in order to clear the chambers. MEETING WITH AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD MEMBERS City Planner, Joe Wallis, introduced three members of Amenities Design Board - Chairman, John La •Tourell; Marqaret Bernhoft and Keith Gold- smith. Don Westlin.and Mike Rizzuot were unable to be present. Mr. Wallis said,that soon after the decision was made by the council regarding the wharf matter, it was thought to be appropriate for the Board and the council to have some informal dialogue, not directed to Laebugten, but to where do vie go from here as far as the regulatory processes and de- sign processes. Councilman �:ellinq said that this is a public meeting, and in view of the litination rending felt it advisable to postpone this discussion until after the litigation. The City Attorney stated again that there will be no discussion of the Laebugten matter or problems related to it. He mentioned that the court hearing is scheduled for September 8th. He recommended that vie wait and see what the result of the litigation is. Mr. Wallace said that depending on the outcome per- haps amendments may have to be made to the ordinance. There followed a brief discussion on signs. Council asked Mr. LaTourell if he felt the work load oppressive. Mr. LaTrouell did not feel that it was, but that the Board would like to have some more time to work with the Planning Department. There was no further discussion. DISCUSSION ON RESERVE FUNDS FOR FIRE AND OTHER, EQUIPMENT The Mayor stated that this item was put on the agenda at the request of Councilman Gellert, who had asked for a report on the City's program established for maintaining depreciation reserves. Lila Crosby, the City Treasurer, summarized her written report which had been provided to Mayor and council. She said that according to RCW 35.21.088, the City has the option of determining what equipment to contribute to the Equip- ment Rental Fund, except for the Street Department, which, is mandatory. Mrs. ,rosby said that the Fund is being administered pursuant to our Ordinance 1111, adopted in 1965. The ordinance states that Fire De= partment equipment shall not be a part of this fund, and that most cities do not include their fire equipment in the fund. She listed four alter- natives for purchasing additional and/or replacement fire equipment. One of them was to include the Fire Department in Equipment Rental; the second would be to place cars & pickups in the Fund and exclude the fire trucks; the third would be to issue general obligation bonds for purchase of new fire trucks and the fourth would be to set up an accum- ulative Fire Department reserve. It was her suggestion to set up the reserve fund. It was asked why fire equipment was left out of the State Law.. Chief Cooper said that when the State Law was passed it was discussed considerably by the legislature. They felt that due to the longer life and use of this equipment it would be difficult to arrive at figures to carry over a 20 year period. Another factor is that the I.S. that regulates the insurance rating for the community, has something to say about whether or not a piece of equipment will stay in service. Chief Cooppr reviewed the life expectancy of various pieces of equipment. fie also reported on cost factors for replacement. A replacement fund was discussed. The Mayor felt that the city was better off on long- term depreciation items to buy therm on councilmanic bonds and pay for them with future budgeted money rather than past budget money: Coun- cilman Gellert commended Mrs. Crosby on an excellent report. PETITION FOR UNDERGROUND LID - PORTION OF GLEN ELLEN VIE14 TRACTS The City Engineer, Leif Larson, distributed copies of the petition re- ceived with regard to this matter. He said this plat was accepted into the city in about 1963 and has been in various stages of development ever since. The property owners on the inside of the plat now desire EET FILE • z EDMONDS COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 24, 1975 -2- DEFINITE PROVISO THAT THE FUNDS BE USED ONLY TO COVER DEFICITS ON THE EDMONDS RUN. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor.Harrison asked Mr. Whaley to write a letter to Mr. Sood advising him of the action of the council. Councilman Gellert wondered if we could ask the Snohomish County Health Board to review sewer problem in the Cherry Hill Area as it is now of a very serious nature. Councilman Nordquist said that he will take it up at the Health Board. CORRESPONDENCE Deputy City Clerk, Eleanor Quealey, read a letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council which indicated concern with regard to the parking in connection with the proposed expansion of the Laebugten Wharf facilities. The letter was signed by Harold L. Janeway and J. Sherman Mills. Councilman. Gellert stated that he had been advised by the City Attorney that he should not participate in the item following with respect to the Laebugten Wharf. Councilman Anderson said that he too had been advised by the Attorney that his particular participation would be out of order, especially since a member of his family participated in hearings before the Amenities Design Board. Councilmen Gellert andAnderson—the' n'stepped dim-- om the council platform. HEARING: L� AEBUGTEN WHARF APPEAL Joe 11is.�C'i•ty—P1•a,nner ,noted that the applicant in this case is Stan Kauffmann, / and the type 6f_-ffe-6ri'ng is an appeal from an Amenities Design Board decision. Mr: Wallis noted that the method of appeal is set forth in Sec. 12.20.070. A letter was received containing six signatures on May 19, 1975 by certified mail which appealed that decision. He said there has been a Shoreline Management Permit that was approved for the site on July 17, 1973 that is good for two years. On January 22, 1975 we received an application for the Amenities Design Board and on that same date there was an informal review by that body. On February 26, 1975 the Amenities Design Board denied an application and asked the applicant to re -submit. On March 5th the application was again considered. That meeting was recessed and re -convened on March llth to again consider a final plan submitted for the building permit. The design concept was accepted, but it was not considered final formal action inasmuch as they were not the final plans submitted for a building permit. On May 7, 1975 the Board did take final action on the plans approving them as submitted. He said there was a side note that there was a problem with the clarification of the building height, and that there was a delay until this matter was resolved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Lyle Neeley, attorney from Bellevue, .was present representing Laebugten Wharf. He asked for a ruling on the timeliness of the appeal. He noted that final action was taken on the 7th of May and the appeal was received on the 19th and said that this is 12 days and not the required 10. Attorney, John Wallace, replied that this was occasioned by the weekend falling at that time so that the appeal was properly accepted on the next regular business day, which was Monday, the 19th of May. Cliff Lawson, 16221 - 75th 14. read a communication which had been received this date in the city offices. Mayor, staff and council members had been provided copies. The communication listed some areas of concern., basically that the proposed structure is not compatible to the present structure or the neighborhood. Mr. Lawson said that in various meetings with the Amenities Design Board the ` neighbors had not been able to communicate the need for the Board to view this as the neighbors would have looked at it. He thought the design must be judged on the basis that it�is to be located in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Sanderlin who is directly south of the proposed building said that all you will be able to see is a metal hull, and that it should be possible to design something more pleasant. Ardith Pielow felt the building could be more compatible with the area. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JUNE 24, 1975 -3- She said that she realizes the need for boat storage, but still thinks the building could be more provincial in feeling. Joanne Anderson said that she / had attended meetings where this design was presented, and essentially it was a metal box. It was asked that they make the building more esthetically pleasing and compatible with the area. The owners subsequently did make some changes, but did not structurally alter the building. Mr. Bob Furman, 20005 Poplar Way, indicated that the was in favor of the building as he felt it was a good sturdy. building. Mr. Neeley explained that this is a 80 x 260 steel prefabricated building for storage of boats. He said the citizen objection was to a plain steel building. Mr. Neeley stated that it is a box because the purpose of it is to store four tiers of boats, and this was pointed out to the neighbors at the time. Mr. Neeley noted various treatments that were suggested, such as color scheme, some architectural treatments to break up the expanse of wall and cedar beams so that there will be some visual interest. It had also been suggested that the roof of the present. building be painted to match the new building. Mr. Neeley pointed out that the use of the building or the function of the building is not what is to be reviewed, but the architectural features is what is to be reviewed. He said that he did not believe it is the right of the residents. to design a building for Mr. Kauffmann to satisfy their sensibilities. It is not an added on building, but a pre- engineered, industrial building. This is a way to keep the costs down when you are on a budget. He said that a wooden structure such as that built in 1890 could not be built today, because it would price them right out of the market. Mr. Neeley then used several overlays on a topographical map which indicated that the homes in the area are 50' and more above the wharf. He also showed slides of the waterfront indicating the location of various homes. Mrs. Anderson commented that it might even be better if the old building was torn down and an architecturally designed new building constructed. In regard to the slides, Mr. Lawson commented that it was not a fair reflection of what can be seen from the houses themselves. There were some further comments made by Dell Carroll, who indicated that he was in favor of the building; Mr. James Bushman, who said that some of the mess created down at the wharf is from children in the neigh- borhood and from others who again said that they would like the building to be compatible and parking to be provided. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. The council viewed the model of the proposed building which was placed next to the existing structure. They asked to see a sample of the siding material, and Mr. Kauffmann provided this, which was a 26 gauge steel panel rib. There was then some discussion on the cedar to be used on the exterior of the new building. Mr. Neeley pointed out that the Amenities Design Board had specified that if any other material other than cedar is proposed, they must again go before the Board for approval. If they do not approve, then cedar is to be used. Mrs. Shippen indicated that it was her observation that the source of the design was four tiers and that the basic shape of the building was never changed. Councilwoman Shippen said that there are gas stations and banks that look like houses nowadays, and that she does not believe that all possibilities have been exhausted in design of this building. Councilman Welling pointed out that the key word in the Amenities Design Board ordinance is compatibility and not design, and he indicated that he did not feel that this building is compatible.. Councilman Clement thought that a project of this magnitude should have warranted engaging a professional architect, and that he given the circumstances, would not say that this is the only way to design this. The City Attorney then instructed the council on the various ways in which they could act on this matter. - MOTION: COUNCILMAN WELLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEMENT THAT THE DECISION OF THE AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD BE REJECTED ON THE BASIS THAT THE AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD DID NOT MAKE A FINDING, EITHER SPECIFICALLY OR BY IMPLICATION, THAT THIS PROPOSED BUILDING IS COMPATIBLE WITH OTHER STRUCTURES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD 14ITHIN THE.TERMS AND FRAMEWORK OF THE ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. qJREET FILE 9 0 EDMONDS COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HAY 20, 1975 -2- or Port will assume financial responsibility for these things when it is completed. The joint study committee had'concluded that logically the Port would own the pier, but be responsible for the maintenance only for the break- water and carry liability insurance. The City would provide Police and Fire protection and perform needed maintenance and garbage service, and the City would also carry liability insurance. There had been no determination as to who would operate the bait and tackle shop, but they said it should be the _ City, as they could then Drovide the necessary cleanup. Repair of major damage r•iould be.handled by the Fisheries Department and the IAC. .The Fisheries Depart- ment needs a letter from the City chat .,ie will assume the maintenance. There ✓�L �--- was a brief discussion on this subject, but Councilman Nordquist thought it would be a. good idea to gather all information on this subject and discuss it then. MOTION: COUNCIL1IP„d NORDQUIST THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN TO DISCUSS THE FISHING PIER ON MAY 27TH. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Dewey Leyda brought up the,matter of a problem with a bill from Sno-King Ambulance for transporting him to the hospital recently. Councilman Gellert jl asked if the staff could investigate and give a report back to the Council in ,.-f- UM,11z two weeks. Fire Chief, Jack Cooper, stated that he has received a number of .U..(�1 calls and has several bills, and that he would be glad to give a complete report I in two weeks. Chief Cooper did mention that it appears that Sno-King is having some difficulty in complying with the requirements of our Ambulance Ordinance. MOTION: COUNCILI"AN GELLERT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CLEMENT THAT A FULL REPORT ON D� AMBULANCE AND AID CAR SERVICE BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 3RD AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. iZI��Lw�t� Chief Cooper asked that the Ambulance Committee, which included Council Members Welling and Shippen, meet with him.to discuss what has been going on in this regard. / A young vioman in audience asked several questions about the Arts Festival and who she should contact in this regard. The Council ,responded to her inquiries. CORRESPONDENCE The Deputy City Clerk noted that she had received two petitions. One was signed by six parties and was an appeal of the decision of the Amenities Design Board with respect to the Laebu ten . The other petition was signed by several people requesting re an modification of the proposed "View Creek Estates" the K R K Homes project. The City Attorney stated that the Council must set a hearing date within 45 days of the filing of the petition on Laebugten Wharf, MOTION: r•ihich was yesterday. COUNCILMAN NORDQUiST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT TO SET JUNF 24TH FOR THE HEARING ON LAEBUGTEN WHARF. MOTION CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMAN ANDERSON ABSTAINING. APPROVAL O TEMPORARY CONCESSION FOR CHICKEN "0" AT CITY PARK 4TH OF JULY The Mayor announced that vie have received an application from Edmonds Boy Scout Troop 301 to operate the Chicken "Q" in the City Park as they have done for MOTION: many years. COUNCILMAN GELLERT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST THAT THE APPLICATION BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED RESOLUTION - 5TH AVENUE SIDEWALKS, 5TH AND MAIN The Mayor said that this is a resolution declaring the intention of the City ` Couicii of the City of Edmonds to improve certain property by constructing concrete sidewalks, retaining walls, or rockeries, and related work necessary to make a complete improvement in accordance with city standards; and creating a sidevialk, construction fund therefor; and providing that payment of the cost of said improvement be made by special assessment on the specially' benefited property abutting said improvement, based on special benefits. The City Attorney explained the requirements for setting a hearing date for this matter. 3IN1 2-OFFICE COMMUl ;,AT, JNPTREET FILE DATE May 20, 19 75 TO Harry Whitcutt FROM Richard H. Allen Building Official Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Building Permits for Pier Shed fo �Laebugten Wharf, Inc. i In reference to our previous memo of May 15, 1974, we have received copies of the Snohomish County Health Department permit for the sewage holding tank and lease by the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources for a portion of the bed of the Puget Sound beyond the Meadowdale Tide Lines. We, therefore, have no other situ- ations i which require delay of issuin the g permit. -� In is requested that the legal description of the lease be included_'' with the legal description of the subject permits. RHA:mjr • STATE -OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bert L. Cole Commissioner of Public Lands Olympia, Washington 98504 Lease No. 10446 RECEIVED MAY 1 CITY BY.....a l....no,. BY THIS LEASE, by and between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, acting by and through the Department of Natural Resources, hereinafter called the Lessor and LAEBUGTEN FISHING WHARF, INC. , hereinafter called the Lessee, the Lessor leases to the Lessee on the terms and condi- tions as hereinafter set forth the following described tract or parcel of State land situate in Snohomish County, Washington, to wit: That portion of the bed of Puget Sound, owned by the State of Washington, lying easterly of a line running parallel with and 80 feet distant westerly of the line of extreme low tide, situate in front of Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block A, Meadowdale Tide Lands, in Government Lot 4, Section 5, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M. SECTION 1 OCCUPANCY 1.1 Term. This lease shall commence on the 3rd day of June 1974 and continue to the 3rd , day of June 1.2 Re -].ease. Upon application made within thirty days of the expiration date of this lease, the Lessee shall have a preference right to re -lease the area herein de- scribed for a period not to exceed that provided by statute and upon payment of speci- fied rental and fees, provided however, that said re -lease is found by the Lessor to be in the best interest of the State of Washington. SECTION 2 USE OF PREMISES 2.1 Permitted Use. The Lessee shall have use of the premises for: Pier. SECTION 3 RENTAL 3-d Amount. Annual rental in the amount of $_35.00 3.2 Payment. The payment of the above mentioned rent to the Lessor each year in advance is the essence of this lease, and the same shall be, and is, a condition precedent to the execution and continuance of this lease or any rights thereunder. Payment is to be made to the Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington 98504. 3.3 Adjustment of Rent. The annual rental for this lease shall be subject to adjust- ment by the Lessor at the end of the first five year period of the ten year lease term in accordance with the conditions and circumstances then governing. 0-180 9/22/72 SECTION 4 RESERVATIONS 4.1 Entry. The Lessor shall have access to the premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of securing compliance with the terms and conditions of this lease.. 4.2 Access. The Lessor reserves the right of access to and across the leasehold premises for all purposes and further reserves the right to grant easements and other land uses on the premises to others when the easement or other land uses applied for will not unduly interfere with the use to which the Lessee is putting the premises, or interfere unduly with the approved plan of development for the premises. No easement or other land uses shall be granted to third parties until damages to the lease holder have been paid to the Lessee or waiver signed by the Lessee. 4.3 Restrictions on Use. In connection with use of the premises the Lessee shall: (1) Comply with applicable laws and regulations of any federal, State and local authority affecting the premises and the use thereof and correct at the Lessee's own expense any failure of compliance created through the Lessee's acts. (2) Remove no valuable material without prior written consent of the State. (3) Not fill or cause to be filled any of the lands covered by this lease. (4) Construct no improvements on the lease area other than those as shown on exhibit(s) on file in Application No. 10446, without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor. 4.4 Improvements. Authorized improvements placed on the leased premises by the Lessee are the property of the Lessee. Upon the expiration of this or a subse- quent re -lease of all or part of the premises the Lessee agrees to sever, remove and dispose of all improvements he has placed thereon within six months from the date of expiration. In those instances where such action is not taken by the Lessee, the Lessee agrees that the Lessor may remove such improvements and charge the Lessee for the coat of the removal and disposal, or the Lessor may, at its option, claim said improvements as being the property of the Lessor. 4.5 Unauthorized Improvements. All improvements made on or to the premises with- out the written consent of the Lessor shall immediately become the property of the Lessor. The Lessor may, at its option, require the Lessee to remove and dispose of any or all improvements, and in those instances where such action is not taken by the Lessee, the Lessor may remove such improvements, charging the Lessee for the cost of the removal and disposal, or cancel the lease. SECTION 5 REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Assignm=nt and Sublease. This lease, or any portion thereof, may not be as- signed, mortgaged, sublet or otherwise transferred without the prior written con- sent of the Lessor. In granting such consent, the Lessor reserves the right to change the terms and conditions of this lease as it may affect the assignee. Fur- ther, if the Lessee is a corporation or partnership and if, at any time during the term of this lease, any part or all of the corporate shares or partnership interests of the Lessee shall be transferred by sale, assignment, bequest, inheritance, opera- tion of law or other dispositions so as to result in a change in the present control of the corporation or partnership by the person or persons now cnining a majority of the shares ..or change in the holding of the corporate or partnership interest, the same shall constitute an assignment of this lease and as such shall require prior written consent of the Lessor. Failure to obtain written approval of any assignment defined in this lease shall be grounds for cancellation. 0-180 9/22/72 5.3 cond{tlon of Premises end Liability. The premises have been inspected by the Lessee and are accepted in their present condition. Lessee agrees to defend and hold State harmless from any and all claims suffered or alleged to be suffered on thn premises or arising out of operations on the premises. 5.4 Insolvency of Lessee. If the Lessee becomes insolvent, bankrupt, a receiver appointed, or his interest is transferred by operation of law, the same shall con- stltute an automatic forfeiture of his lease. Insolvency as used herein will mean the inability of the Lessee -to meet obligations as they come due. SECTION 6 MISCELLANEOUS 6.1 No P rtnelship. The Lessor is not a partner nor a joint venturer with the Lessee in connection with the business carried on under this lease and shall have no obligation with respect to the Lessee's debts or other liabilities. 6.2 Non -Waiver. Waiver by either party of strict performance or any provisions of this lease shall not be a waiver of nor prejudice the party's right to require strict performance of the same provision .in the future or of any other provision. 6.3 Attorney Fees. If suit or action is instituted in connection with any contro- versy arising out of this lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover in addition to costs such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorney fees. 6.4 Succession. Subject to the limitations as stated in paragraph 5.1 on transfer of the Lessee's interest, this lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and assigns. 6.5 PIotir_es. Any notice required or permitted under this lease shall be given when actually delivered or when deposited in the United States mail addressed as follows: To the Lessor: Department of Natural Resources, Public Lands -Social Security Building, Olympia, Washington 98504. To the Lessee: At the address given by the Lessee in the signature block or as shown on later official documents of record with this lease. 0-180 -3 9/22/72 S. 6.6 Liens. In the event that liens or other charges are placed on the leasehold premises or the improvements thereon, such liens or charges arising out of the Lessee's actions, direct or indirect, then the Lessee .shall immediately cause such liens or charges to be discharged. If the Lessee fail;; to discharge said liens or charges within ten days of notification to do so, then such failure shall constitute grounds for cancellation of this lease. Furthermore, the Lessee sliall pay and in- demnify the Lessor for all costs, damages or charges of whatsoever nature, including attorney fees, necessary in the. discharge of such liens.or charges, whether such costs, damages or charges are incurred priortoor subsequent to any cancellation of this lease. 6.7 Default. If the Lessee shall violate or default any of the covenants zad agreements contained herein, including the obligation to pay rent, then the Lessor may cancel this lease provided that the Lessee has been notified of the violation or default thirty days prior to such cancellation and such violation or default has not been corrected within .such time. In the event the Lessor elects to cancel this lease, all improvements located thereon shall become the property of the State of Washington. 6.8 St_ate's Right to Cure Defaults. (1) If the Lessee fails to perform any requirement or obligations under this lease, the Lessor shall have the option to correct the obligation of the lease after thirty days' written notice to the Lessee. All of the Lessor's expenditures to cor- rect the default shall be reimbursed by the Lessee on demand with interest az ;:he rate of 1 percent per month accrued from the date of expenditure by the Lessor. (2) In the event any violation or breach of the provisions of this lease io causing damage to the leasehold premises or the Lessee is utilizing the leaswl:old premises in a manner not permitted by the provisions of this lease, or in any case damages are occurring to the leasehold premises, the Lessor may immediately enter upon the leasehold premises and take such action as necessary to cease ouc'r, damages or use. In the event the damage or use is occurring by reason of a viola- tion or breach of the provisions of this lease, the Lessee shall be liable for all costs incurred by the Lessor by reasons of such violations. The Lessor at its option, may send notice to the Lessee of such violations and the Lessee shall immediately cease such use or violation and correct and remedy such violations. The Lessee expressly agrees to all covenants herein and binds himself for the payment of the rental hereinbefore specified. Executed this of . 19. STATE OF WASUINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES By BERT L. COLE Commissioner of Public Lands Signed this f day of 19 /. mg 0pf. . No . 10446 9/22/72. FISHIN,.. WHARF, INC. 16111 76th PNOZO Weft Edmonds, WA Address Title i 7 ��,ET FILETo: The L"dn�TGs Cie C urci� The undersigned do hereby appeal the decision of the City Amenities Design RECEIVED oard to grant f' al approval for the proposed additional boat storage at MAY, LaeBugten's Wharf. 19 1975 _ The following reasons for this appeal are respectfully submitted for your EdmondsEngr,Dept, consideration. 1)' The proposed design is an "add -on", pre-engineered, industrial metal building whose major design consideration has been directed towards its functional suitability for the intended commercial application. The commercially zoned site consists of several tideland lots in an otherwise completely residential view area. An industrial metal building of the proposed scale (200' long x 86' wide x 35' high), and located on the water which affords no opportunity for site screening, is in- appropriate to the Surrourding r1esid nti_n! view area. In addition, the proposed building presents a conflicting and unpleasant contrast to the . other building cn the wharf. The proposed structure lacks adequate consideration for the aesthetic and environmental values of the surrounding area and constitutes a visual blight which will detract from the property values of the residential community. It is the recommendation of the undersigned that the applicant be required to present a design which addresses itself to the compatibility with the existing commercial building and demonstrates proper consideration for the aesthetic and architectural design features as well as its functional use. %lo Z Zi — -75��,�� 4161c; �f C- X2` ZJ LILL U --� La > 75 /G2Zo. ?Sn .L� ` 0S 4 2-,, pad 1;7 G) 1.Z 0 i INT[ OFFICE COMMU' C AS DATE May 15, 19 75 TO Harry Whitcutt FROM Richard H. Allen Building Official Assiotant City Engineer SUBJEC i Laebugten Wharf Building Permit The following information is requested to be supplied by the developer prior to release of Building Permits: 1. Written approval from the Snohomish County Health Department for the septic/sewage holding tank. 2. Clarification of the tide land limits in reference to available property for this structure. The Site Plan indi- cates construction to take place beyond the westerly tide lands limit. RHA:mjr i •4REET FILE • AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD MAY 7, 1975 The regular meeting of the Amenities Design Board was called to order by Mike Rizzuto, acting as Chairman, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at the Edmonds Civic Center. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Margaret Bernhoft John LaTourell Joe Wallis, City Planner Mike Rizzuto Harry Whitcutt, Building Official Don lr!estlin Leif Larson, City Engineer Keith Goldsmith John Wallace, City Attorney Eleanor Quealey, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. WESTLIN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. RIZZUTO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED. AGENDA ADB-8- Stan Kauffman (Laebugten Wharf) - Revi'ew of plans for dock and �— dry storage building at 16111---7"61h P1. W. (CW) Mr. Wallis presented the -"plans for the dock and structure from the. larng con" a ning the notes that were made at that time, and also the plans that were submitted to the Building Department for consideration. Mr. Kauffman, a representative from the Ur"ignt Company and Mr. Neeley, attorney for Laebugten, were present to speak on the matter. Dick White, of the Wright Company, explained the plans to the Board, and said that they have tried to incorporate the amenities suggested at the last meeting. These were reviewed by the Board, with the assistance of a model. The exterior siding was discussed. Mr. Kauffman said that they intended to use"wood, or an acceptable substitute. Mr. Westlin said he felt the Board's preference would be for real wood material, perhaps cedar. Mr. Neeley asked if they would have to come back before this Board if they decided to proceed with something other than wood. Mr. Rizzuto said they would. No one in the audience wished to comment on this item. Mrs. Bernhoft made a motion which was seconded by Mr. Goldsmith approving ADB-8-75, subject to the use of cedar siding; and if this is not used, then Board will again review. Mr. Goldsmith said that he would.like to have the words "or equal" deleted from the plans. The applicants asked what would be an appropriate time to review, and Mr. Rizzuto said that could be at any regular- meeting prior to installation. City Attorney, John Wallace, said that this should be an agenda item. Ile said further that it should be specified what set of drawings are being referred to. There was a discussion on the cupolas. It was pointed out that they are on the plans submitted this evening, so they must remain unless there is a motion to remove. The color of the roof was then discussed. The City Attorney advised that the motion be re -stated. MRS. BERNHOFT THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. GOLDSMITH TO ACCEPT THE FINAL PLANS AS PRESENTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT ON APRIL 29TH, WITH THE EXCEP"PION THAT IF THEY DO NOT USE CEDAR, THAT IT IS MANDATORY THAT THE BOARD REVIEW AND APPROVE ANY SUBSTITUTION, AND EXISTING ROOF IS TO BE PAINTED BLUE TO MATCH THE NEW BUILDING. MOTION CARRIED. On advice from the attorney, Mr. Rizzuto stated that this is the Board's final action on this matter unless, as stated in the motion, there are amendments or changes. ---.a•,�-. «-�y �. Yv G-' ?'r , y .7 f� i - . z, c�Y F' X r �-.-��Yt ¢*�-' �.f l ci� �7�-J i �i� 1p c iJ ry -y;' y N+ �.v � � - 'y. �I' .' ,�. , '%f„' '� '� � [." ¢ J � f b+ei J'. �+ _� ""1. � r .7 ✓�'b f �'7'Ft "r �'.•'p� - - a 3 °'' .t l l;+,g r 9 1' d�•! t t f rtn f' k i+`°1� 4 r sy�, �i� ^.a { r yr.,-': v? �: jfl ?i iJtrr f+` y 1 tt u � 'r1 .+iY' 1 � � s• .i�-it F +y. � 7: .(' �? i` f °t':°"� -r'n` �qc � q �i;, t.��• ,' J' _�FF•4' ra, .Y. �t r Ex tt .aft ,i k{. Na13ti .',d�NY,'� - LE s ,�,.ls. �"j:. ���.✓✓�, S I-� ir(I - r�,5 �.'^ .:r � .•, .� ,�d. �>. ;�.p„ �,1 t, F �'i y � � � _ �+� ♦ r . '��,,✓4nt�A•.yrF4' .l�Y{tA; srtr l a tY ,� y +�P'-ST :. 2 .a., 4. ti, f '- � - I � f!1_..-•J - .- - + ;�iF }-" �i ,h t r, + r( }._ s' v"`r.*td ,o t +f �, � ' , l I-! 59 7 e y }r u r a t f Pr 1° • 5 1 -! .if ' (Y' r r d ,y + i .+t i (r F ..�'` Y<�� i .' `,: "�? D -. "~j" 'r.C'ct: ft- Ra ''�''. [ 5 J Nd: ( cl+ t.",� <. - -•�� i, e'.. h ,c•r � r.'°j � �yaL+y� � i ri n S .�-. T� Y h 1'V� ry a{d �(t r �p��r�l' - �: r,t.r ' :f a s,�}: �t 4 ^.btu•, 7Al r > 3 ' 1 �•. -ir T 1 J` ,�1� 2 1 D S, , •f•, lc...J �A r ",.r a n � a--,._,y h ;�.d '" I, t yrt �k k � b� •! rm s � y '_ a D _F t. A • r a,•+�t�r;s, .JY-J - {- :'1'r•c t Ai, �tr 2'�c r� �rSj t �W_- L r- t4��fr';i •�.N �. [ + f". "a f 7 '. M) �': _}� - t S?• ] /�' b• R fir < f. :� 4d ',• _ .r' q i - t-. 1(J��[�, ��•1 4 -5" ) �i t ft '( 'fir if .. `i ✓ .- ,,� .y l6_ �r 7+1 - � A'` t ry y•!tr .4 ad' r 1 ,1 3_ 1 +'tis r iti -,`" rf ` J�r "7 ' �, - ♦ `Se ntir_r 0, !'* �} r"r�� j.ty„r 1.. JrM�' y t; � x��,,^'�.(}.'��' �i •Jrf.,� r ? � �tii; '` i- we - i RECEI VE'D } y'Or, a; M WY 15 1975"t�{; ' 1. jr 'f -ir - 1 ••f .T "�i JI t � - t - � - # 4.1 � -may,, '�'. '. .3 Ilk :•.�'} e t, -•' .f _ • J-'p' •<+ `. }, �,a., Y. ,._ s•_ 7 � .. j w + 1-.. y l,� a.3' ,,.air. �ti*4 r � �1r •,;1 ; ,t f .t J .. { rl.. f i;l ,;,,. �' '? } �, t.,; c - � 3 J * ,j[.r*'� q�A, r ft ... it r r - �� ,t �t P f ;ls � f. °r ! N , A►4 '' � � ) J,� a.� A� .�_ n-_'p +r1F'{ t .:°if +.i l -f- rtf�� �_,kA-• P..:�r7f �1��`i�rs �t1 �:4`ib�,i:l A is vy$!br�+ 5¢�t 4 r t.• f+ r y' I. 7 { f/ri t'+9ri, ,."tJ- tc j kt J'r .> t r t t+A''� ! �.§.t ty s 3 .� i °. 1..;°'�- : L wJ r ,./�'i'i c'�;i ip'` �}' 'r',T 7j�� ,! [� ' a � t7ot `Ri . '+ i .iM !r. � k;� � ` • i w :i J' f - b. , q ` � . t ; u -fi 4 r ~ sii rust- Y vl { 74 H J y 4tJ � Y 'u4.. '�$'�'.>rx.�'i.a_�'.�i.t.._.t�...r�1,:.:....t.,..._�..sr:....u:sf.,_....L;.•:,_..,r,t4M �� f___f:..J P... y_.� 3 .-1.-. .�-- ----'-_-'. , +F < } 'ik r r• t r , 1 D ;yr` :PERMIT TO INSTALL A TEMPOI%P% r,J T, SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM i d E f Division of Environmental Health Snohomish Health District Courthouse, Everett Washington Washington f + Septic Tank gals AVVI Isp:.Fiel sq. ft. Tren h' &, 4/ 5 t r c :Othermay% 1 •j °Date .. '� _ `' _/v e 4 �� .'• 1 PERMIT EXPIRES ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF ISSUE wt' ' By issuing this permit on the above described property, you or any future owners will assume all liabili- t. ties for the sanitary function of this system. This permit was issued according to the latest engineering data available on a "temporary sewage disposal system." DO NOT COVER BEFORE APPROVED BY SANITARIAN OR DESIGNER 74 .j +� ` S'J •-.at .at}v�.;{+,: ".'.'.d•�' T J ..L.'SJ.*{ J- ;.(.[ ^sN t �b t - ii: - w t k' •3; -: -a "ww11. ��,, t+'f : is D 1.t - Y5t.' R�. A '71• f,. ►L sr q r' S iY 1 r �. ' - .t' fr r -. f t •g,i .,.1}►-Y" �6t �'rt'►{ N 4r ,tt -t5 F .. l ✓.� y�.:. 1. + Ei. -.r d s,c ?r ,pt,,r `y��yja, '•rt�"r ds .�r<.. lh e .dyc.•� �.,. rr•�j r, � ;'�': ss+� {de y,f ^ r �'�,1' { r f 9'� c. , .. �. t > ,fit t X �! q 4 ! ..1 � - � rn, R e . ►r� �' 1 v r'�: �^ ,t� i X it c?4 � _�.: x c , r � X ,� •t ..a; � t r x � �y. , W 'r � " X i �' �',�+` �. iir•"Kr .,+yr�b?'•'r.t'j'� .•f>'n, .t°' '`�?�°bh ( ie: rp�"u ,J ' y. «t 4,., L" '1,.J{3, f 3 �.f t, x�b 7, r¢� t•'.4k7.Awry.:^Ee.ry,i,.issa.Jti•;ti%tRr.'T+Js-J.Ir'1 :•�tyr'�,.'�'�rrL,iL i_.,k'JL:'i+£.Y-i►'J,�1:.r.�'ii�Pxfl'' • R�CEI �'£�� • � APPET FILE MAC 24 19� CITY Of EDMON®S "1"44fpgr•Dept Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 Building Department March 24, 1975 Mr. Keith V. Wright The Wright Company 34839 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington 98002 Dear Sir: Re: Laebugten Wharf 16111-76th Place West This is to inform you that the plans received by this office, In respect to the above project, are presently being reviewed by the City on a preliminary basis only, pending a formal permit application with complete plans. In order to accept a permit application the following additional plans and specifications are required: 1. Complete design details, including structural calculations and erection details, of metal building. 2. Complete design details, including soil test report, structural calculations and drawings, of pier structure. 3. Complete details of any alteratio isting building, including provisions for automatic sprinkler sys e . 4. Complete details of boat elevator, sewage disposal sys�c:. boat racks, ventilation, storage of hazar ous ma erials, a 5.. Construction details of material and attachment of architectural amenities. 6. A copy of preliminary review by the Fire Department is enclosed. 7. Preliminary review by the building department indicates that building must be protected by I -Hour construction on south wall within 20 feet of property line per section 2103 Uniform Building Code. Page #2 March 24, 1975 Laebugten Wharf 8. The Planning Department preliminary review indicates that plans are incomplete for a determination of building height. Please furnish the required information in order that we may determine a plan check fee and accept a permit application. Very truly yours, EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT__—, 4��, '—h , �Po' Harry M. Whitcutt Building Official HMW/ae cc: Fire Dept. Planning Engineering • 0 AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD SPECIAL MEETING - MARCH 11, 1975 The special meeting of the Amenities Design Board was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman John Latourell in the Library Conference Room. He explained that this special meeting is a continuance of the hearing on March 5, 1975. PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT John Latourell Don Westlin E.Joseph 'Wallis, City Planner Keith Goldsmith Harry Whitcutt, Building Official Margaret Bernhoft Jim Murphy, City Attorney Mike Rizzuto Jan Pool, Secretary AGENDA ADB-8-7 Stan Kauffman (Laebu ten Wharf) - Request for a new dock and dry storage building at 16111-76th P1. W. CW)-_Cntinued from 3/5/75. Mr. (e4tWri-ght of Wright Construction, presented a model of the pier with both the proposed building and the existing building shown. He pointed out that some drastic changes have been made to the buildings. They have given a.roof relief using a wood treatment, increased the piling size to reduce the eve height and added a wood arch and fake structural beams to give the feeling of three separate buildings. He pointed out that the wood arches and structural beams are raised from the building surface so that you get a shadow line during the day and it also breaks up the building line. Mr. Wright stated that they had given it a different color treatment using an alternate color scheme for contrast. The model shows a solid roof with breaks of wood but he indicated it could be shown with the white breakup with roof venilators. Mr. Lyle Neeley, attorney representing Mr. Kauffman, pointed out to members of the Board that the wood trim and pilings on the model are removable if they wished to see other variations. Mr. Wright circulated a pamphlet showing the inside of the proposed building and samples of the color schemes they have been working with; those being Harbor Blue, Surf Green and Cypress Olive. He said the people in the community seem to favor the greens over the blues. He stated they had done the model in the Harbor Blue, the roof and middle panel on the building in solid blue. Mr. Wright stated that the white would pick up the reflection from the water toning it to a green or:a-darker color. Mr. Norm Nelson, a resident of the area for some 60 years, said there had always been some business in that area. He said he looks down over the property and felt the model as presented is very pleasing to the eye and he would have no objections to it. Mrs. Joanne Anderson, 7370 North Meadowdale Road, said she was surprised at the effect of the changes but that she would still like to see larger piling and would still like to see some wood paneling on the sides as was previously suggested. a. Amenities Design Board Special Meeting 3-11-75 ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffman (continued) Mrs.Pielow, 15908-75th P1. W. said she felt that much improvement had been made but she still does not feel the building'is compatible with the surrounding.area. Mr. Rizzuto asked if any consideration had been given to the suggestion of Joe Wallis, City Planner, that a walkway be installed along the south side of the building. Mr. Wright said they did not feel it would be practical to have a fishing walkway on the south side since it would not be in full view of the pier operator and would be difficult to monitor and control. Mr. Rizzuto said it would not be necessary to have it as a fishing walk but this same design would breakup the southside dimensions. Mr. Wright said cost is also a consideration. There was general discussion of the tide levels with Mr. Kauffman stating that the average tide level is out at just about the middle panel of the proposed building. Mr. Latourell asked how deep the deck was going to be. Mr. Wright stated it would be approximately 2 feet but that the final engineering has not been completed on that. He stated further, that they would have a spandrell deck with concrete carrier beams that go across (Mr. Wright referred to the model to demonstrate his explanation). He stated that the beams would be flush with the finished face of the building and would be spaced every 19 feet. Mr. Goldsmith asked if the new building would join the old building. Mr. Wright stated that they would be joined at the roof line to protect the dock. He said they had problems with the old dock deteriorating and would remove that portion of the old dock and a multiple gutter would be installed as reflected on the drawings. Mr. Goldsmith stated that he liked the color used on the model but that it does not look good with the existing color on the old building. Mr. Neeley stated that the color on the existing building is not gold as shown on the model. There was general discussion of the color used on the model. Mrs. Bernhoft said she appreciated the changes and did feel there was an improvement however she said she was still concerned that there is not enough wood relief to break up the vast appearance of the building. She also raised the question of parking requirements and asked what arrangements would be made to accommodate those using the boat storage. Mr. Wright stated he had talked to Mr. Bill Rowe of the City Planning Department and was advised that parking must be 6% of the boat storage facility which would be approximately 15 stalls. He reported that they have approximately 55 stalls at the present time. Mrs. Bernhoft also questioned the driveway area and whether there would be additional piling added. She said the boards there appeared shakey. Mr. Wright stated that at -the present time the driveway adequately handles the traffic load with ease even on a crowded day and did not plan to add additional piling unless the driveway was expanded. Mr. Neeley said he did not feel that 'shakey' or deficient was a proper description, that the boards are not nailed down tight purposely to slow traffic down. Amenities Design Board Special Meeting 3-11-75 ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffman _(continued Mr. Whitcutt, Building Official, stated that the Fire Department will require engineering certi.fication .that the boards will support fire apparatus. Mrs. Pielow said she would like to see the fishing walk as suggested by Mr. Rizzuto but realized that cost is a factor. Mr. Neeley said that financial consideration is only one problem, that another would be liability problems and another is that it would be on the southwest side which is the direction of prevailing winds. Mrs. Bernhoft also stated that she would like to see more wood trim on the south side. There were several suggestions of variations of wood trim that might be used. Mr. Wright stated that the cost as well as insurance requirements must be considered if a great deal of wood or wood trim is used. The Board members and members of the audience viewed a number of variations to the model which included: no wood trim on the roof; no pilings; no blue panel on the side; vents on the roof with white patches of relief; wood trim removed from the ends of the building roof; and the roof on the existing building shown in blue with out the cupola. Mrs. Joanne Miller, 17131-75th P1. stated that just seeing the two roofs with matching colors seems to bring the two buildings together and is an improvement. She said it did not matter to her whether they were green or blue as long as they matched. Mr. Bob Furman, 20005 Poplar Way, Lynnwood, stated that he was familiar with this type building and felt it was very appropriate for the area. He said he had worked in construction and worked on this particular type of building, liked the clean line of the building and felt the Board should get on with the approval of it. There was further discussion of the roof color with a member of the audience stating that neighbors in the area preferred the green. Mr. Neeley said careful consideration should be given to the color to be used since it would remain for a long time. The model in its final variation -was shown without the pilings, with the wood trim from each end of the roof removed leaving two strips of trim on a solid color roof, blue panels in middle section on sides and the existing building with matching color roof with cupolas removed. Chairman Latourell asked for comments by Board members. Mr. Rizzuto stated that vast improvement had been made on the appearance of the building. He recommended that the new roof color match the existing one and that the pilings be removed as shown and the wood trim on the roof remain. Mr. Goldsmith said he liked the blue color and liked the building without the pilings. He asked Mr. Wright if the existing asphalt roof could be painted to match the new roof. Mr. Wright said he had painted asphalt roofs before and felt that it could be done. He said he would do a test run. Mr. Kauffman confirmed that there is a paint available to use on asphalt and there should be no problem. Amenities Design Board Special Meeting 3-11-75. ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffman (continued) Mr. Goldsmith stated further that he felt the wood fake structural beams are good but as far as the wood trim on the roof is concerned he would have to waite to see it in actuality. He said he did feel it would help to break up the roof. Mrs. Bernhoft said she preferred the blue color with matching roof color and said the wood trim on top is needed. She said she also liked the building without the pilings. Mr. Goldsmith said he was hopeful that what ever paint was used that it would not glare. Mr. Wright stated that there would be ribs in the panel and it would not glare. Also the wood trim would cast a shadow. Chairman Latourell said he felt there had been very significant changes in the appearance of the,building. He said he preferred the building without the pilings and that the existing roof be painted to match the new, preferably blue. He said he preferred the roof without the wood trim. After further discussion of the wood trim and roof color, Mr. Latourell said he still preferred the roof without the wood trim but would defer on that point. Mr. Rizzuto said that he felt they were all in agreement that they can accomplish what the Board is seeking. He suggested that they submit their final plans along these lines. Mr. Neeley stated that these are the final plans. Mr. Whitcutt stated that they have not been reviewed by the Building and Engineering Departments. Mr. Neeley said he understood that he had to have the ADB approval before he could take his plans to the Building Department. Mr. Whitcutt said the applicant could apply to the Building Department at the same time he applies to the ADB and that he would recommend that approach in case there were any significant changes that would effect the appearance of the building. Mr. Latourell said what is requested tonight is a concept approval and the model presented reflects that concept. Mr.Murphy, City Attorney, pointed out that there are two stages of approval; preliminary approval of the architectural drawings and preliminary plans, and the final approval of the detailed plans. Mr. Neeley said what they are asking for then is preliminary approval so that they can proceed with development of the final plans.. He said they could then go to the Building Department knowing that they have approval of the building, design wise, if in fact no structural changes are made. Amenities Design Board Special Meeting 3-11-75 ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffman (continued) ��r. Murphy said that he did not see any preliminary plans. Mr. Wright presented two copies of preliminary plans with elevations to the Board members for their review pointing out that they do not match the model now since it has been altered. The Board reviewed the plans and there was general discussion of the fake structural beams with Mr. Wright stating they would be approximately 8" and could be as much as 12" when completed. After general discussion Chairman Latourell said he would entertain a motion. He stated that notations would be made on the face of the plans presented to reflect modifications that had been made to the model and that final plans must reflect':the appearance of the model as approved. MR. RIZZUTO MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE DESIGN CONCEPT BASED ON THE MODEL AS IT IS NOW SHOWN WITH THE PILINGS REMOVED, WOOD TRIM ON EACH END OF THE ROOF REMOVED, WITH PROVISIONS THAT THE TWO ROOFS ARE MATCHED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE, EITHER IN BLUE OR GREEN, AND THE PLANS MUST REFLECT THAT IN THE FINAL APPROVAL. Mr. Goldsmith said he would second the motion if Mr. Rizzuto would amend the motion to indicate the use of the color Blue rather than green. Mr. Neeley said he was not sure it could be matched. .Chairman Latourell stated that the Board had been assured earlier by Mr. Wright that it could be done and asked Mr. Wright to confirm that. Mr. Wright indicated that it could be matched and the asphalt could be painted. MR. RIZZUTO AMENDED HIS MOTION TO REFLECT THE USE OF BLUE ON BOTH ROOFS. MR. GOLDSMITH SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Murphy said he would like the motion to show that this is all subject to approval by the Building and Engineering Departments to determine that it does not violate any codes or requirements. Mr. Rizzuto stated that the motion was for the design concept. ON THE CALL, THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. There was further discussion of the cupolas on the existing building and whether it was the desire of the Board that they be removed. Mr. Wright indicated that low profile venilators could be used. It was the consensus of the Board that the cupolas should be removed and was so noted on the face of the plans. Mr. Murphy stated that the plans shall be impounded by the Planning Department along with the model and that they are not to be altered in any way. Meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. ... REET FILE • • Si • Amenities.Design Board - March 5, 1975 - Page 2. ADB-32-74 AnthonyYiPan razio - Final Review of Townhouse apartments at 23122 - 76th West RML) _ Minor revisions to approved plans (5/22/74) The applicant presented the plans. The Board then reviewed the minor changes. Everything seemed to be in order. Mr. DiPangrazio was asked when he.olanned to start work, and he answered that they hope to start about the first of April. ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffmann (Laebugten Wharf) - Continued from 2/26/75. Mr. Neeley, attorney for the applicant, displayed a rendering of the proposed building which Mr. Kauffmann had done. Keith Wright, of Wright Construction Company, stated that at a meeting last night, they went through about 30 designs. Mr. Wright had with him a model, which incorporated some of the ideas expressed by the people in attendance at the informal meeting last night. He said they have put a wood frame beam on the building, and have tapered the walls in at the bottom. In doing so, they lost approximately 8' of -aisle space. The building does have an overhang and at night there will be floodlighting over the sidewall. There also will be clusters of wood.pilings along the side, which will be tied together. There is a light panel louver on top to relieve the flat roof. In a,discussion regarding colors, it was thought that light colors blend better with the surroundings. Mr. LaTourell asked why they went to a tapered wall. Mr. Wright said that it was a combination of things, but that they thought it gave more movement to the building. There was general discussion of the design and comments on the sketches which had been presented. Mr. LaTourell .read a letter from the Meadowdale Community Club, which was addressed to the Board. The letter said that at the meeting of February 26th, the .impression was given that the Club was 100% in favor of the proposed building. The letter said that the motion was made that the members, "would not mind" the development of the Wharf. The vote was taken after the meeting, and was 14 for writing the letter, and 4 against. There are 75 members of the Community Club, therefore, 57 people did not express an opinion regarding this matter. The letter went on to say that they would like to commend the Board for the action taken at the February 26th meeting concerning the Laebugten Wharf; and that it is important to all of us that the city and its waterfront be developed with intelligence and integrity. They indicated that it is a design problem, and that the owners have not taken all factors into consider- ation. The letter was signed by Martha and Earl Morris, 17306 - 73rd Avenue West, Edmonds. Mr. Neeley pointed out that there are -a great number of trees in the vicinity of the Wharf, that will effectually screen the Wharf. Mr. Cliff Lawson, 16221 - 75th Place West, said that he has permission to cut down the tree cover that Mr. Neeley referred to. Mr. Lawson . asked how far the dock extends out into the water, and Mr. Kauffmann said about 360'. Mr. Lawson asked the Board to take into consideration that there are many absentee owners of property in this vicinity. He said that he had talked to a Mrs. Scully, who had recently purchased about 270' of property on 75th, and that she was opposed to this structure. Mr. Lawson said that he will present a sketch later in the evening that is approximately to°!scale, which will indicate properties 600' to the north, 600' to the south and 8-900' back from the water which will show whether owners are for or against the project. Donna Crawford, 15824 - 75th Place West, said that all of us in Edmonds should be concerned about good design. Ardis Pilow, 15908 - 75th Place (Jest indicated that she is opposed to the project, as it does not look related to the present structure at all. Amenities Design Board - March 5, 1975 - Page 3 ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffmann (Laebugten Wharf) Joanne Anderson, 7370 North Meadowdale Road, said she was surprised to see these sketches tonight, in view of what she, -and other neighbors, saw last night. She said that they had been concerned about the plastic look of the building itself; the bulk of the building, and the unrelieved expanse on the south elevation. She said that she could not see any appreciable change in any respect. At this point, Mr. Lawson submitted his drawing to the chairman. It was reviewed by the Board. Mr. Lawson pointed out that it was not his intent to make this report favor any side of the issue, but to indicate who is, and is not in favor of the project. As far as he was able to determine, 23 out of 34 residents of the area, were against this proposal. Bud Leufken, 16320 - 75th Place West, said that he is indicated on the drawing, and said that his main objection is the design, and that it is incompatible with the design of the present building. John Sanderlin, 16220 - 75th Place West also was opposed. John McIsaac, 2351 North 148th, said he is in favor of the facility, and commented that the design is well above what you see on the shoreline now. Following further discussion, the meeting was recessed at 9:10 P.M. and reconvened at 9:25 P.M. During the recess the Board and members of -the staff and the audience viewed the model and the sketches. Richard Long, 15562 - 9th N.-E., Seattle, said that he maintains a boat at the dock and said that he was in favor of the original model submitted for the new building. He said that there is not too much latitude with respect to building a commercial -type building, and that the owners have a perfect right to build this type of building in that zone. Mrs. Anderson said she understands this, but that the , property owners also have a right to protect their own property and their own investment. At this point, Mr. LaTourell asked for _. comments from members of the Board. Mr. Westlin asked Mr. Wright how much out of plumb the building is now.by tapering the sidewalls. Mr. Wright said that it is 8 feet out of square. which entails extra expense for the special engineering. Mr. Westlin said perhaps that extra money could be used to better advantage; and that we are looking for some relief on the south wall. He said he would like something on the exterior of the building that would come across the roof to give some semblance of a dockside ' operation. Mr. Wright said they have tried to increase the amount of wood used (clusters of pilings, for instance) without making it too busy. Mr. Goldsmith said that the darker color used, especially for the roof., the better; and that he is not at all satisfied with the south side. He indicated -that he would like to see some shadow and texture. Mr. Rizzuto said that he'would like to see some wood on the sides of the building and carried up over the roof. He suggested trying some wood on the model to see how it looks. Mrs. Bernhoft agreed that the facility is needed, but she too would like to see some -wood treatments on the model; and that there has to be some relief on the south wall. Mr. LaTourell.said that there is still a serious problem with the south wall, roof and appearance in general. He indicated, that with all things considered, a handsome building could be designed for this . site. Amenities Design Board - March 5,.1975 - Page 4 ADB-8-75 Stan Kauffmann (Laebugten Wharf) _ Mr. Neeley said that he would like any motion to clearly state whether final action is being taken, or whether the matter is under advisement or subject to further plans or models, etc. Mr. LaTourell said that the Amenities Design Board cannot take final action until the Board sees the plans for the building. City Attorney, James Murphy, concurred in this. Following further discussion, MR. GOLDSMITH MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN TO RECESS THIS MEETING AND RECONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, MARCH 11TH TO FURTHER CONSIDER ANY PLANS THE APPLICANT MAY WISH TO SUBMIT. Mr. Wright said that if they are delayed too much, they would have to wait perhaps a year, because of the tide situation. He said the pilings should go in soon. There was discussion, and the City Attorney suggested that a meeting could be held in the Library Meeting Room, as the City Council will be meeting in the Council Chambers the evening of the llth. MOTION WAS THEN VOTED UPON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The meeting was then recessed at 10:10 P.M., and is scheduled to reconvene at 7:00 P.M. on March 11, 1975. 0 S-MEET RLE CITY of EDMONDS 0 0 Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775-2525 Building Department RECEnfvor February 28, 1975 MAR 3 1975 TO: ADB Members Edmonds Engr. Dept, Planning Department Engineering Department SUBJECT: ADB-8-75 (Laebugten Wharf) The following information is offered for your consideration in.review of the above application: BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the following will be required: I. Approval of the building plans by the ADB, for compliance with Ordinance #1698. 2. Approval of the building plans by the planning department, whose responsibilities include checking to ensure that: a) Lot is legal. b) Use is appropriate. c) Lot coverage, setbacks, building height complies with code. d) An environmental assessment has been made. e) Shoreline Management Act has been complied with. 3. Approval of building plans by the City Engineer and the Public Works Department to ensure that utilities such as water, sewer, power and access have been provided for. 4. Approval of fire extinguishing systems (sprinklers) by the Fire Department. 5. Approval of the building plans by the building department including: a) Structural and non-structural review for compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechancial Code and City Code. 6. Posting of any required bonds. February 28, 1975 Page #2 Memo to ADB (Laebugten Wharf) Since no plans have been submitted to this office for review by the City, the only information available in respect to this project is the preliminary plans submitted in 1973. Review of these plans by the City indicated the following: I. See memo of January 18, 1974 from planning department to build- ing department. (copy attached) 2. See memo of December 18, 1973 from fire department to building official. (copy attached) 3. See memo dated December II, 1973 from city engineer. (copy attached) 4. Building department review indicated the size of the structure would require that both the existing and new building be fully sprinklered, regardless of whether the construction be wood or metal. i I oa�� Harry HMW/ae CITY of E®1 ONDS Civic Center • Edmonds, Washington 98020 Telephone (206) 775-2525 Office of City Planning January 18, 1974 MEMO TO: HARRY WHITCUTT, BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM: KAY SHODDY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW - LAEBLIGTEN WHARF (SM-2-73) 1. Building is too high. Sec. 32 of the Shorelines Management Act prohibits any structure of mroe than 35 feet over aver- age grade level which would be the dock level. 2. Building to be erected does not comply with conditions of shorelines permit; i.e., that the new building will be com- patible in motif with the old building. Owner agreed to the City Council at'the hearing that this condition would be met. 3. It is not; apparent that building style and relationship (in elevation) to existing building ,-sere not adequately represented on application for Shorelines permit. 4. The building, as submitted, will have a harmful effect on the amenities of the surrounding residential waterfront environ- ment. Sec. 173-16-060(4) part C of the Guidelines (adopted by State Department of Ecology) suggest that "an assessment should be made of the effect a commercial structure will have on a scenic view significant to a given area or enjoyed by a significant number of people". The Wharf is visible to Talbot Park to the south and the entire "leadowdale Beach area. I have had several complaints from citizens of the area that the proposed building will be.a scenic blight. If we feel that the applicant is not willing to comply with these aspects of the Shorelines Management Act, we will request that the Shorelines Management permit be revoked under the pro- visions of Sec. 14 (7) which reads as follows: "Any permit may be rescinded by the issuing authority upon the finding that a permittee has not complied with conditions of a permit". Ka Shoudy �L Assistant City Planner KLS/peh P. TO -Harry, Whitcutt, Buildinn Official _ / ' TY OF®M®N®S 250 - 5TH NORTH EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 _.._ �__—___ ____.__T_ —_ _�___—_.___ _ _..__ ❑ POLICE DEPT. ® FIRE DEPT. SUBIZCT REPLY REO DATE YES NO Preliminary Plans: Laebbugten Wharf 12-18-73 Preliminary Plans Check will require the following: 1. Fire hydrants on wharf as required by Hydrant Ordinance (check with Engineering). 2. Automatic Sprinklers 3. Certification that wharf will support fire apparatus. 4 4 t!•:. FORM NO. MEM. 88T DATE PLEASE (SIGNED REPLY TO v* !R. H. Klein, Asst. Chief S!GNED e SEND PARTS i AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT, PART I IS RETURNED WITH REPLY UJAdr 40 � c I f ffWe., ikl ECG. COW l I •Alt - pit i;E �=�� No Ny ors �►� ' f�� , t; ,. .of-�►o,� RECEIVED DEC 11 1973 y R•• F MY OF EDMONDS �j;, � t. � a F to �'D .. • r i�, `• Al _ .. .. f + �y-,.LS_lA -..r..�ii.-.Y•sr.+� -y-T" MV :.1' � t „ 'i •i � H'. •4 . jj; f ' A- f 3� • WREET FILE. Edmon oard of Adjustment - Febru� 24, 110 - Page:2 CU-3-75 continued) and 196th. Mr. Wallis said that he had been advised by the attorney to ascertain that there will be only on -site parking, no outside displays and no outside storage of materials. Hearing was then opened. Mr. Clarkin said there will be no parking. problem as most material will be sold by telephone as a part-time business. Any large shipments will be drop -shipped directly to the buyer, and nothing will be stored on the premises. He also said there will be no sign. Clearing was then closed. MR. KNOKE MOVED, SECONDCD BY 14R. ROY THAT CU-3-75 BE APPROVED AS IT �( MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR HOME OCCUPATION, AND WILL CREATE NO HAZARDS nn FOR THE NEIGHBORS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. U-4-75 mann - 16111-76th Place !,lest (CW) - Boat storage for Laebugten Wharf. r. Wallis stated that this application was made in accordance with Sec. 12.13.230(e), which requires a Conditional Use for any covered structure over the water. Mr. Wallis presented a cony of the zoning map in that area. He showed a sketch which indicated the proposed.' building addition and.the present building. Mr. Wallis noted the zoning in the vicinity of the .project, and mentioned that 76th is a collector. He said there are sewers needed, and there have been provisions made. At the present time there is a requirement by the County that provisions be made for the sewers, and they are holding that application until action is taken. Mr. Wallis showed slides of the property. Mr. Wallis reviewed the criteria for conditional use, and indicated a positive report on all points, except that sewers will be needed and they must have approval of the Amenities Design Board. He stated that this project has been before the Amenities Board for a preliminary review and they were not particularly satisfied with the original proposal. In summarizing his findings, Mr. Wallis said that this is a long time use appropriate to the shoreline and an institution in the City that contributes to the quality of life in Edmonds. A Shoreline Permit has been approved by the City of Edmonds and the Department of Ecology; and the existing structure is significant in age and construction, and- it is hoped that the. addition will be compatible with the "comfortable" neighbor. Mr.Wallis recommended that it be approved, subject to resolution of the sewer disposal problem and according to engineering standards and criteria, and also subject to Amenities Design Board approval;and that a Health Permit for a holding tank has expired and should be re-established at the County level. Mr. McQuade read a letter from a gentleman residing at 21141 - 22nd P1., Everett, Washington offering his full support for the project. Mr. Wallis then read a letter from Mr. Neeley, attorney for Laebugten, which said that in order to meet the community needs Laebugten's must expand. Ile said that they feel that the proposed metal structure is the best possible method to effect this expansion. Mr. Neeley, 600 Seattle Trust Building, Bellevue, was present and read a letter from the Meadowdele Coimrw nity Club wherein they stated that the membership is not opposed to the project. The letter was signed by Gail Hankinson, President. Mr. Wallis said that this project conforms to the uses permitted in a CW zone; and he felt there had been ample indication from the City Council that the use at the Laebugten Wharf is one that is compatible with that particular location. Mr. Neeley had pointed out in his letter that a CU Permit had been approved by the City in August, 1973, but it had expired due to the problems of getting a Shorelines Management Permit and arranging financing for construction. This then, OEdmondWard of Adjustment - Febru*24, 1*- Page 3 CU-4-75 Stan Kauffmann is essentially a re -application. Mr. Neeley pointed out that the structure is essentially the same as presented previously, except that the height of the building has been reduced. It is now 31'6" to the cave and 35' to the peak of the roof, which is the maximum. allowed under the Shorelines Act. The dock height allowed under the Act is 8' above mean high water, and Laebugten's is 6'3". There were several people in the audience that indicated that they were present in support of the new construction. Keith Wright with Wright Construction Company, 34339 Pacific Highway S., Federal I•lay, presented a scale model of the proposed building which was placed next to the present building, also to scale. Ile said that the building is designed to provide an enclosed racking system and lift system for the storage of boats. Mr. William E.Pielow,Jr., residing at 15908 - 756 Place blest., Edmonds, said that he does not object to the enlargement of the wharf, but is concerned about the litter problem. He said that with the expansion, it means more people and more boats, and he would like to have some control with regard to the litter. Mr. Stanley Kauffmann and Mr. Fred Wills, principal stockholder$ :-sere present and said that containers are provided for waste, but this is a generally recognized problem on the waterfront with children and adults. Mr. Walt Weinmaster, 20419 - 81st Avenue West spoke in favor of the project. James Bushman, 1926 - 200th S. W., Lynnwood said that 85Z) of the litter problem is from the kids that come dorm from the high school to eat lunch and the ones that congregate in the evening. Bob Berman, 20005 Poplar I -lay, Lynnwood stated that this facility is desperately needed. Mr. Perkins, 5623 - 170th Place S. W., Lynnwood said he would concur with the previous statement. Mr. Wallis stated the conditions governing this type of structure. Mr. Neeley said they were familiar with these conditions, and have provided for this in their planning. They will have access to the shore as required. Ile stated that they have no objection the requirement that the Amenities Design Board approve the structure. Mr. Neeley suggested"that the Board of Adjustment indicate, in its approval to the structure, that it is approving our plans and specifications which offer this steel, or metal storage building." Ile said that the reason for this request is, that this is practically all you can build to store boats. He indicated that they could not duplicate the present structure, because of the high cost 'of lumber. He said, further, that if you could duplicate it out of metal, you would still be faced with two tiers of boats maximum, and you cannot justify the cost by that method. He said if the Amenities Design Board wishes to work with them on exterior design and paint colors, texturing, etc., there are enumerable things that can be done with that building; but; if you build a building to store boats - that's what it is going to look like. City Attorney, John Wallace, said that the Board of Adjustment cannot rule with regard to the materials and the building, as this would be usurping tho function of the Amenities Design Board that has been specifically delegated to them by ordinance. He stated further, that it is not the function of the. Board of Adjustment to dictate, or approve, or disapprove, types of materials or design, only as it relates to the satisfaction of the conditional use criteria. fir. Wallace said only items which the Board relies upon should be incorporated in the motion. The hearing was then closed. fir. Robinson asked if the aonlicants have covered the area of sewage disoosal. 'tr. tlallis said the a-plicants have made contact with the County iiealtil Depar'o,!ent. T:iey ;iavl� had a r1er?^it in the oast, !7,1ic!1 - w LCmor0oaru ui AuJustmenIT - rOPIA , �• - Page 4 CU-4-75 Stan Kauffmann 'has expired. Mr. Neeley said that application has been made, and that it is his understanding that the County is waiting for the granting or denial of this Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Kauffmann explained that they have engineering drawings approved by the County, but they have not yet submitted them to the City of Edmonds, because they have not progressed to that point yet. They will have holding tanks, and Mr. 'Wallis stated that this will correct a situation that is presently unacceptable to the City, in that sewage is being released into the Sound. Mr. Kauffmann said that he had been assured by the City of Edmonds that they will have between 80 and 100 psi water pressure which will handle a sprinkler system. Undergrounding was then discussed, and Mr. Whitcutt, said that he had the engineering drawings, and they do indicate that undergrounding is required. Attorney tWallace said that Sec. 12.13.240 of the Code also requires that there will be no overhead wiring permitted on piers, docks, moorages, floats or wharves, except within covered moorage structures. He said the Board can require conformance with that provision, even to pre-existing structures at this time. Mr. Neeley said that before that requirement could be made, it would be appropriate to find out whether it is practical or not. He said he would not like that to be a requirement, unless there is some specific need for it. There was general discussion, which covered undergrounding, height limitation, trailer traffic, etc. The hearing was then closed. Mr. Roy said that as far as he can see, it is the Board's responsibility to decide whether a building would be permitted in that area. fie said he finds that the building does meet the criteria as far as this Board should be involved. MR. ROY THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. KNOKE THAT CU-4-75 BE PASSED. City Attorney, Wallace, pointed out that this matter now will go to the Amenities Design Board for approval. Building Official, Harry Whitcutt, said that they will not issue a Building Permit without the approval of the plans by -the Amenities Design Board, and any requirements of the Shorelines Management Act. Mr. Wallace said that the Board, if approving, would only be allowing a permitted ' use with such conditions as the Board feels should be imposed in order to satisfy the criteria for granting of a Conditional Use Permit. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. N-5-75 King Size Photo Studio - 22917 - 100th Ave. W. - Conditional Use Permit for Drive-in Photo Business in accordance with Sec. 12.13.150 (I) (Bid) Mr. Wallis stated that the applicant has already had approval for the sign, but they had not been advised that a Conditional Use Permit was required, and that was the reason for their appearance before the Board at this time. Mr. (Wallis projected the zoning map of the area and a site plan on the screen. He recommended approval, subject to engineering requirements relating to direction of traffic in and around the building. Mr. Wallis also showed views of the site where the building will be erected, and pointed out that it will be paved and landscaped. The hearing was opened, but as no one wished to speak, the hearing was closed. MRS. RUTTER THEN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. ROY THAT CU-5-75 BE APPROVED, BECAUSE THE USE ;WILL NOT ENDANGER THE HEALTH, MORALS AND GENERAL 14ELFARE OF THE CITIZENS; AND MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF OUR ORDINANCES; AND SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS AS TO TRAFFIC FLOW. CARRIED. CU-6-75 Thermo card Insulation Co. - 138 Railroad (CW) - Conditional Use Permit for manufacture and sale of insulation product. Mr. Wallis reported that this application was withdrawn at the request of the applicant; and the fee has been returned, less advertising costs. ST&ET <;;r,enities Design Board - January 22, 1975 - Page 3 [0 B-3-75 Edmonds Boys Club - Sign for club building at 6th Ave. N. and Edmonds St. Mr. Wallis stated that the applicant had notified him that another commitment prevented him from attending the meeting tonight, but that he ;could like to have the application reviewed anyway. Mr. Wallis pointed out that the building in question is across the street from the Civic Center, which is painted a slightly muted orange. fie said that the sign is substantial, but that we are in an awkward situation in not having specific regulatory measures applied to public -use buildings. He said the activity performs a service in the community, inasmuch as it provides recreational activities for boys in the area, and that the sign is necessary identification. The drawing indicated that the size of the sign is 10' by 10'. Mr. Goldsmith said that tie has gone by that building for years, and that:it is opinion that everyone knows the use of the building and that Ice could see no reason for a 10' x 10' sign facing a junior high school on a side street in Edmonds. lie said that it seemed to him that they could take the sign that they have and put it out at the face of the building, and that Would adequately -identify the building. MR. GOLDSMITH MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN THAT THE BOARD REJECT THE REQUEST FOR THIS SIGN. It was noted that a letter' accompanying the application stated that the sign was to be nailed to the face of the building. THE MOTION CARRIED, WITH MR. RIZZUTO VOTING AGAINST. AD_B-4-75 John C. & Ruth Frothingham - store sign for "The Herbary" to be �V Tocafed at 115-3rd Ave. N. (BC) Mr. Wallis present application and pictures to the Board, and stated that the applicants were present. Mr. Westlin noted that there is a 30' side yard and a 27' building in 60'. Mr. Frothingham said there is no side yard on the other side. Mr. Wallis pointed out that there is no setback requirment in a BC Zone. The Board reviewed the plan for the sign. Mrs. Frothingham asked if a sign could be put up on the south side of the building using the same lettering as this proposed sign. She was told that the Board could not consider that this evening, as they would have to see a sketch of it. MR. LATOURELL MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN TO ACCEPT THE SIGN FOR THE HERBARY. MOTION CARRIED. ADB-5-75 Kinc_Size Photo.- Drive -up Photo Store on 9th Avenue (100th) one- half b1 ock north of Edmonds Way (BN ) Mr. Wallis said that this is a pre -cast concrete building on which the sign goes all the way around. lie said they will ask for a clarification as to whether or not that is a permitted sign, as our Code does not address signing exposed other than to the street front itself. Mr. Wallis presented the site plan, and photographs of the proposed building. It was pointed out that the zoning to the north was residential in the County. Mr. Woosher, the applicant, explained that this will be an 11'8" x 8' elliptical pre -cast concrete building. He showed the. Board a sample of the color to be used on the concrete and a photo of another n building just like the one to be erected. Mr. Goldsmith asked if this � „/ would have to have landscaping along the north side, and Mr_ .l-Jallis replied that it would not. MR. RIZZUTO 14OVED, SECONDED BY MR. WESTLIN TO APPROVE THE PLANS SUBMITTED, SUBJECT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT'S APPROVAL OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE. MOTION CARRIED. LAEGUGTEN Mr. Wallis stated that he had two other matters that he tiould like the WIHARF Board to hear in the order in which they came to his office. The first was Laebugten Wharf. In regard to this matter Mr. Keith Wright of Wright Construction Company was present and Mr. Stanley Kaufman, the owner and operator of the Wharf. Mr. Wright introduced himself and stated that they design and build steel buildings, and said that they like to add character and design to the comnw n'ity with steel buildings. • • �. . „itirz DC Sign Board - January 22, 1975 f'ac;e 4 Mr. Kaufman explained the history of the Wharf, and showed the Board a rendering of the building proposed. He said that it will be a steel building, as the cost of constructing a wooden building today t.ould be prohibitive and the fire insurance is quite high. He said it will be made to look old like the existing structure and the existing structure will be re -finished to hariironi ze and blend �;ith the new structure. He said that the building will house 200 more boats, which will all be inside the building. Mr. Kaufman said that t'rhere will be approximately 275 concrete piles with a concretes deck. Mr. Rizzuto said that the picture and the plans do not look like the same building. The plans indicate a typical, standard, metal frame, sheeted, straight gable, low -profile building. Mr. Wright said that it is the same building, but the sketch shows a false gable. The roof and gable would be painted to appear l'i ke' tyre present structure. Mrs. Bernhoft said that she had received many phone calls.this evening with regard to this building, and said that she could not vote for 4. this building as she felt she should respect the feelings of the residents of. the Meadowdale Area. Mr. Warren Mc.Clintick was in.the audience and commented that he is a member of the Meadowdale Community Club and he also had several calls this evening. No one appeared to br against the building, even though they did not know exactly what it would look like. There was more general discussion on what the building will look like. Since no action could be taken this evening, it was decided to hear the views of the Board members in regard to the proposed building as suggested by Mrs. Bernhoft. Mr. Rizzuto commented that one of the most pleasant things you see while driving north on 76th W. is the view of the present Laebugten Wharf building. Ile said that would be lost if the new building is placed on the south side. He said that he would like to see more detailed drawings showing hour this building is going to be made to look like the present structure. Mr. Westlin said that lie would like additional detail, as he is worried about the profile. fair. Goldsmith asked if the wooden building would ever be removed. i4r. Kaufman said that it would not, but that the trodden pier would eventually have to be replaced. Mr. Goldsmith said that the present building is an absolutely beautiful.building, and that this new building would completely ruin it. He said that he could not vote for what he sees this evening, as it violates every design idea he has in his head; and that the buildings are incompatible. Mr. Latourell said that he recognizes that steel buildings can be beautiful, but that he cannot bring himself to say that this proposed building is beautiful. He feels that it will completely dominate the present structure. I;e feels that painting a false roof and gable on the building is not in keeping with the surroundings, and that it might be impossible to design something that will be compatible. - lie said that perhaps there should be something more diversified. It was suggested to Mr. Wright that he build a model of the building so the Board could see more detail. Mr. Wright requested to be on the agenda for the meeting next month. l,!ASHINGTON Ben McAdoo, Seattle architect,'was present in behalf of the Washington MUTUAL Mutual Bank located on 205th, across from the Frederick and Nelson (SANK parking lot. He presented plans for a canopy to cover the drive-in % windoi%,. lie said it will be stucco, and ►dill be the same color as L/ the fascia. Mr. Wallis mentioned that the bank has done a very fine job with their landscaping. Mr. Latourell asked if there was any procedure that they must follow before taking action. Mr. Wallis :Mated that since there is no requirement for publication of notice, -it is at the discretion of the Board whether they wish to take: action. He rent on to say that the only process involved is one that the Board established themselves in that they would like to have tyre plans at least fourteen days before the meeting so that there is adequate time F11_� 1 DMONDSfNCIL MEETING "MINUTES �... JANUARY 1974 ? of r; -3- t ntai1 some change in that',installation, maybe some'new equipment, perhaps removal of some of the sound reducing devices that had previously been put on there, etc.' Ward Phillips thought a change in circumstances has taken place and thought remedial action should be taken. Following more discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Nelson to instruct the Building Department to_ investi ate the premises and determine if there has been any change to substantiate the readings by Prof. Mueller and bring those par icu ar inves `. ' ations to e attention 'o ie.City-Attorney so is the councilcan make an adequate determination and that triis reporshould be ready by next week. Y unc man Nordquist seconded,the motion. Jane Cunningham, who was,in the audience, stated that she would ask that no one go on her property without permission from her or Mr. Cunningham and that the noise'level readings be taken along the store property line. Harry Whitcutt, Building,Official, stated that this would pose a problem since the fence is. not A, on,the property line and the -code says that you must take readings on the property line, and therefore they must be taken from the west side. Mr. Whitcutt asked Mrs. Cunningham if the City did not have permission to go onto her property? She replied that she was too angry right now and the answer is no; and that he will have to zoo on the store owner's property. Jim Mueller suggested that i if ,further measurements are to be made, that they be made in other areas other, than ground level at the property line. There was .further discussion, and during that time Mr. Cunningham said that if Mr. Whitcutt and an expert in testing for noise pollution were to come to his door and ask for permission to take readings on his property lie would grant thatpermission. Counc7woman Snippen then amended e motion to authorize the Building Inspector to retain an acoustical engineer and that the report come from a qualified testing laboratory. Councilan Nordquist seconded the amendment, which was voted, upon, and carried. The main motion as amended also carried. Mr..Wiliiam Gear presented the City Clerk with petitions 'signed by owners of property'suffering from storm water problems in vicinity of Walnut, .west of 7th ?; -and east of 6th. The City Engineer is to report on this matter on the 2.9th of January.. Mr. Ed Robinson.mentioned that at the last council meeting it was determined that ' ,'.A he City Attorney was to file an injunction on the Harbor Building and he asked if he could have a report on the matter as of today. Attorney Wallace stated. that he has requested.that there be an executive session so that he may report the results of his research and his analysis of the problems that arise under such a lawsuit to the council prior to instituting the action. There was a brief discussion on the measurements ta;:en of the bu:i lding height. Jim Mueller suggested a possible moratorium of 30 to,'00 days for the acceptance of applications 'for.building permits' until this matter is resolved. Attorney Wallace said there is precedent for such action.. Pat Crawford, 15824-.75th Place West, said that Laebugten Wharf is virtually in his front yard and that he is. concerned with what will happen with regard f 1 to this project and was pleased that the council is considering moving swi t y to establish the Amenities Design Board. criteria. Ile also favored a moratorium for issuance` of.building permits. There was some discussion regarding Laebugten Wharf. It was.pointed`out.'that they, have their Shorelines Permit, but have not yet applied for their building permit. Councilman Welling made a motion seconded by Councilwoman Shippen that the City of Edmonds adopt a resolution declaring a moratorium on accepting for filing any building permits in the City of Edmonds except those,applied for ire single-family residential areas for a period starting instantly and terminating March 1, 1974, or upon the effective date of the proposed Amenit.ies`Design Board. Ordinance Amendment, whichever first occurs. Harry Sherman asked if this meant remodeling also, and that he was'concerned with the work being done at the.Senior Center. Ward Phil.l.ips spoke in favor of a moratorium. Warren Murphy, 22919 - 100tI: West asked what happens to the builder that has made.application and .is almost ready to proceed. Attorney Wallace said that his rights relate back to.the date of application, and that the items of the codes of Edmonds that must. be met, are" fixed as oithat date under.State Law. ' x TO FROM - I City of Ed rids P1aiOwl epartmeiif ohomish Health District. urt House Attn: Kaq houdy — Everett, Washington F-- REET E Edmonds Waahin' ton SUBJEI T Laebuaten_Wh r�_f _-_ _- ---- - c�A�r 1�14 73 MESSAGE gor your informat ion.;_-We._haveHasued-_a bolding— -- -- ---- — to Harbor Cons truction_company-for- the- Laebugten _Wharf..--__— -- REP .V SIGNED C. H. Mangu�r, R'.S., Supervisor Environmental Health Division _ SIGNED DATE SEND PARTS I AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT - PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH RL I.Y. Redifprm* 45 472 fib( el II 16 FILI October 12, 1973 } Mr. Stanley Kauffman Laebugten Wharf 16111 76th Place W. Edmonds, Washington 98020 SUBJECTS Availability of Sanitary Sewerm for Laebugmn Wharf Dear Mr. Kaufman: In reference to a request from Douglas Jonas, Harbor Construction Company, we are writing this letter to supply in- formation on sanitary sewers for the Wharf. At the present time there are no sanitary sewers available in the immediate area for the Wharf to connect to. The City has prepared a Comprehensive Sewer Plan divided into 7 units. Laebugten Wharf is in the Unit 7 area covering the area known as North Meadowdale. Because of the low density of popu- lation and the estimated high cost, we have found it necessary to apply for State at n y and Federal assistance in order to install the ' sewers. To date, we have not been able to obtain this funding due to the low priority and lack of grant monies in general. The City is actively pursuing the avail'ablity of funds and will sewer the Unit 7 area as soon as the assistance is available. •« Because of this fact, it is difficult to estimate the exact time 4 the sewers wil l be installed If is hoped that this information will meet your present needs as referenced to the City sewerage system program. Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS RICHARD H. ALLEN Assistant City Engineer RHA:mjr ccS Douglas Jonas , r Z, WWII STREET FILE"''� • January 25, 1968 Mr. H.F. Haines, Jr. Haines.Wharf, Inc. 16111 - 76th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Herb: In regard to your letter of January 25 and the paving of the streets in the Plat of Haines Wharf No. 2. A policy has been established that when sewers are installed by L.I.D., the restoration of improved streets calls for a full lift to the entire width of the paving; in other words, one full surface of asphalt paving from curb to curb. This eliminates the unsightly and rough conditions of strip patching. Because of this policy, we are recommending that you go ahead and pave the street in accordance with your plans and specs. as originally submitted. This will eliminate any bookkeeping between you and the City as was proposed in your letter and will insure a satisfactory street for the purchasers of your lots. RLW/rf i Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS RONALD L. WHALEY Assistant City Engineer El z 3, 7 -ro/.5 7 e> Q 1 2 44 � 31 -a X&XZ46, 41- /--;/ HJ Y, -3 4 ^l 1941, IS �f< 7- Nj N Q IF. NIA/ /0er.- IV07,61 e,+DA11Z)A4 A%,4-72�2> OZ 4 07- V 4z, If- Jvd X z - -r/- -ol >L) -410 All -1 A 6 V—'6 Z 1- V FZ5ll /Df -7/71-/ X 4 4 V'- 7- f !11 JU•13tt.7 4" N< K V "5/ex 8 f it 7' wea .77 'Pet arl-,� V Z A 7- V40 VP l P1 L) J� - 1p" ve t :0 17 t"j, Xz, 7 >1 /24111V 04 ./ C A-/ L- ILLD Att, IJ M I j � it i f �� 17 I/A j.._ .� r. v .. .. ,...,...._... . ............. i per T, rl K /V- �j (3-0) FOCI. X G \,)14" s H. NtA � rLCY, 1 A g1' FLO. t W 18 913'17- FV, � 4 X,9 F, �. frif hpf- W/z*ttjc ewnomarr- e 3 M -rnp� X Zl/-z. x .4 - 30' FAr- DEP� CoNti. LN5f) GALV. l 40 PIP� V49A)70M A S'l 0-P,- Vill Wlfw-re). Druita 25 0;#: �IJ x Fw. A urwra Qi V1 Ne�97ze —S Al-l- 1AA�-LZ)1A14 '4:f W67-LD F))Z/./j4t -,-D 14//7AI "1--I-*A till Z, 4J6W-7- WA-,Ll .727 Mee-ee-7- A-IZ6 G. 6ig J7 WA 7Z. S 70 CV:� A� MI, WA' A MA-71-S. 7-49 67D X4A Pl)j= A- t 7, I/V J4- c--A7- 6-- TD 0i!F- I1-1,U /A4 P1,1A 7- cz)XITCA(7 HANGERS A U HOOK S COACH SCREW ROD] C *e-CLAMP DITOP BEAM CLAMP E EYE ROD F FLUSH SHELL G CEILING FLANGE H SIDE BEAM BRKT i J-BOL -K,ISHORT CLIP L 't:- ROD M TOGGLE NUT N MACH THD ROD P POWDER DR S I TUDI R WEDGE ANCHOR T 2 U V L- X Y TWO,WAY EART"QUAKE BRACE + FOUR-WAY EARTHQUAKE BRACE QU* f IN ES-STRUCTAURE To _ PIPE SPRINKLER SYMBOLS TYPE 1/2 SPRAY 1/2 -I, 3/ CI4 3/4 SPRAY 91 M I 1 1/2 1/2 SIDEWALL — 0 1/2 DRY 01* �0 �&, TEMP. RATING z it 0 0 160, 2 212 0 0 z U Z z 2800 in 380' 1 1/2 -1 Ic — z "lYMOOIJ DEVICE jaull 07--q PIP L-VA1011D 77- -Z`5�z _- __ K TO FABRI CATE DISTRIBUTION GYS 4!5 fIv- 7-0 71�41 e- 101LORWI-) Fil SYSTEM HAZARD ae ollW 7-ZAc�-Ae S GENERAL NOTES 1. PIPE SIZING & SPACING CONFORM TO NFPA PAMPHLET NO. 13 STAND ARDS MAURO FOR CCUPANCY. 2. ALL MATER1Ay I Eq IPMENV 0 Z ."Al 'fz-, BE NEW & UNDERWRITERS le S, APPROVED. 3. PIPING DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER IIJ TO CENTER EXCEPT RISERS L DIMENSIONS SHOWN THUSLY 11-6) t 4. EARTHQUAKE BRACING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITHt! Nil PAMPHLET NO.13 0 CONTRACT WITH 7-, Al AN E- V 9 2t 7- 4 4o 77- re IMF'.. r V -ell _7141 W1041 4 foe CmLzalll -s 7- it CMPMA" (IVA, 7-6 -t2; 0,l Y Z2347-A 11 r , e'V1 -MA P,4 7-67 6 - z ts-- V/ gpiN - v.4 4 v6 P., 7- :�S 7 V W11A4, 16, "76 LH )";Z �2- d! 0 4�1 J, A4 6--/? IV! 779-te- &V�94 4EDM bAID -e-� WA. ?00�20 ENGINEERIN G DEPT. SENTRY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO H) V Zc V.) Examined by 45 4- L;v /) v2e. A S, 7 Date IPW10-110-c- " -e E, g - 51�0 -1�z Remarks- Engineer I Date Sheet I Job No Z.,E1-1A1SAcV, I <t - Z - 7 / AA- -� 1 // 157el 71D 7W/-S Z* WA 1� L AS C--A 116'A 4z. VA-1 o /".S Z14 A 77.,V AF1 -Ir/ Ale- ... ..."l?«�1'LA -775- 7-, ... 77/16 A10 - )c*4,,q-r I-le-ool I 1 1, — IN 1ti V e�ll Oe� �-,zlwlllIQ6� "11 S F—=AL 0 Approvals', Required W 57 A-75 /V07-2F,' 514U7-DF-r- 0AI C-'A-e,7- . -,e7- WITH 7-',, V`IA1147�- FILE STREET /// / / // CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT "nC. 1S90 September 1, 2010. Mr. David S. Mann Gendler & Mann, LLP 1424 Fourth Ave. Suite 715 Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: Meadowdale Marina Building Permit applications BLD2008-0693 & 0694 Dear Mr. Mann: MIKE COOPER MAYOR I have reviewed your request for an extension of time that you submitted on behalf of Mr. Milosavljevic. As you are aware, these permits were applied for on August 12`h 2008. Permit applications are valid for 360 days in accordance with 19.00.025F of the Edmonds Municipal Code (ECDC). Permits may be extended for an additional 360 days as provided by the code. These permit applications were extended last year. Permit applications may not be extended more than once. Please see the attached excerpt from the ECDC. 1. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 360 days following the date of application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter .be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. 2. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 360 days prior to such expiration date. 3. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application life of 720 days. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on any applicable code or ordinance change, and pay new plan review fees. The code as written does not permit an additional extension of time for these applications and I am unable to grant the request. If you are aware of some other authority for action that I may have missed, please provide the reference and I will review. The request • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan submitted did not contain any documentation that could be considered to provide an alternate decision. I realize that this creates some difficulty, however, your client may certainly apply for a new permit for the project and would then have 360 days to complete action on the new application. Any new application would, of course, need to show compliance with the currently adopted codes and regulations. If I can provide additional clarification, or information, please feel free to contact me via phone at (425) 771-0220 or by email at yarberry@ci.edmonds.wa.us cerel Leonard Yarbe .ry Building Official GENDLER & MANN, LLP ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW Michael W. Gendler• David S. Mann Keith P. Scully Brendan W. Donckers *Also admitted in Oregon Theresa Umbaugh Senior Permit Coordinator City of Edmonds 121 5r" Ave., North Edmonds, WA 98020 1424 FOURTFI AVENUE, SUITE 715 SEATTLE WA 98101 www.gendlermann.com August 6, 2010 RECEjIVE® AUG 10 2010 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Gn' OF •EDMONDS (206) 621-8868 Fax (206) 621-0512 direct line: 206 621-8869 mann(u aendlermann.com Re: Building Permit Applications BLD2008-0693 & 0694/Meadowdale Marina Dear Ms. Umbaugh: I write on behalf of Vladan "Milo" Milosavljevic in response to your letter of July 22, 2010. As you probably know from conversations with Milo, he is stuck between the proverbial rock and a hard place on these permits. He is still awaiting further approvals from the Corps of Engineers as well as confirmation from BNSF for the railroad crossing. While Ann Bullis's October 28, 2009 letter to Chevy Chase states that the City does not need the BNSF approval, indeed it does. The same letter states expressly that the City needs confirmation that its inspectors are not trespassing if they cross the BNSF tracks. BNSF is meanwhile waiting on the Corps and the City's building permit. As with many individuals and small businesses, These are difficult times for Milo and it is not made easier by overlapping federal, state, and local government and private railroad requirements. While we recognized that you have granted one extension on these applications, please also recognize that Milo has paid almost $24,000 to the city in processing fees. If he is forced to re -apply this will be money wasted — money that Milo does not have to waste. In short, on behalf of Milo, we respectfully request the City exercise discretion and grant an additional extension of time on these permit applications. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, GENDLER & MANN, LLP 01 David S. Mann cc: client tl tl r RECORDED OF SURVEY A PORTI.ON OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF THE-S.W. 1/4 SEC. 5, T.W.P. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M., IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON ;��',�• SOUTNIINE GOVERNMENT LOT 3 SECTION 5 S89'49 06"W 2440.59' .____ ____ ) -___ -• N.E. CORNER LOT i S.E. CORNER GOVT. LOT 3 'X o FOUND BRASS WITH . IN CASE. ' 1 g DELTA - 4' 13'32" h DATE VISITED SEPT. 27, 1976. ILO a io p Q. RADIUS - 5118.$8' t6 6 LENGHT = 377.5 1' , ' S89'49'07"W �, ►° - - T, . �• �. ►� �cv + 4. CR0'd0'n.Q"W tmn 7St' to + °+ 0 z-� 0 V) to 0 O 30 60 ( -INI FEET) 60 feet i INSTRUMENT USED r LEITZ 94201r / GEODAMET0 / ZEISS LEVEL BASIS OF* BEARING ASSUMED BEARING OF • NO3'49'38' W BETWEEN THE SOUTH OUARTER CORNER' OF SECTION 5 AND THE S.E. CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT .3 IN SECTION 5. ELEVATION DATUM (MLLW). ' ELEVATION NTUM FROM 'U.S DEPARTMENT -OF COMMERCE, NA17ONAL OCEANIC AND `ATMOSPHERIC AIWINISTR4TION. NATIONAL -OCEAN SERVICE, ' TIDAL ' pEtiCH' MARKS;' BENCH 34RK STAMPING No. 1. 1927. RESET 198Z ALL), • No. - 'SY5719, ELEVATION OF 3.282: •METERS. THE DESCRIPTION 15 AS FOLLOWS. THE BENCH MARK' FS' SET INTO' THE TOP OF A FORMER CONCRETE BASE FOR A . RAILROAD SIGNAL TOWER, 225'. FEET •(69 m) NORTH OF THE CENTER OF THE MAIN STP UT• AND RAILROAD CROSSING INTERSECTION, AND 30 'FEET.'(.1) EAST, OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS.. ` SURVEY REFERENCi:S 1. 1970 RUSKIN '. FISHER SMIEY }; 2. MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, AT PAGE 28, RECORDS OF' SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON, LEGEND• • .0003 O FOUNO'NONLWW.AS NOTED r, �(4f ' 3/4" OWN PIPE SET W '1976. LS: No. 12399. rfi " C 1 CALCUTATEO SE WN CORNER POSfW9 M.H.T: UM RM TIDE- 10.0 U0. MFAN LOW WATER TIDE.2.80 ELL EMWX LOW TDE '-4.5 I000cxl XM NAD 83/91 WASiIMTOH' STATE. PLaWf COORDINATES SYSTEI�1. E.' XXXM=. X' NORI NNG AND •EASTM' FRO11 $000 COUNtI° OOORD AX SYSYTE'><I. v ��s A 90.43 LINE ,BLE V /.1 / I l l LINE No. BEARING DISTANT L l N23'40'23 "W 30.411 L2 N33'51 '56 "W 30.41 L3. N34'43'07'.0W 27.471 L4 N27.55.44 "W 27.471 . L.5 N20'35'05 "W 25.58 j LEGAL DESCRIPTION UPLANO ' LEGAL LOT 7, 8, 9, 10 AND 11. BLOCK A'MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 AT PAGE r, RECORDS OF THE SNOHOMISH. COUNTY AUDITOR'S. 1 TIDELANDS LEASE AREA LEGAL DESQPT10N COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST C NER OF LOT 7, BLOCK A, MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS AS PER PLAT RECORDED VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, AT PAGE 28 RECORDS. OF THE SNOHOMISH COU►;Y. AUDITOR; THENCE SOUTH 89'49'06" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF $D LOT 7, 390.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF EXTREME LOW TIDE AND. THE POT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89'4906" WEST 48.83 FEET`THENCE"SOUTH 10'35'40" WEST 254.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51'4025" EAi 88.01 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF -LOT If. BLOCK A OF SAID PLAT; nNCE NORTH 89'49'07" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 90.43 FEET TO THE. Pif!T OF EXTREME LOW TIDE. THENCE NORTHWEST&RLY AND NORTHERLY ANG THE LINE OF EXTREME LOW TIDE. WHICH IS APPROXIMATED BY THE: F6L' WING COURSES. THENCE NORTH 23'40'23' WEST 30.41 FEET; THENCE ORTH 33'51 '56" WEST 30.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34'43'07" WEST 27.4 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2755'44". WEST 27.47 FEET, 'THENCE NORTH 20'35'011 WEST 25.58 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00'54'31 " EAST 181.05 FEET TO ' THI'POINT 'OF BEGINNING. I SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICAN THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEIMAOE BY ME Olt UNDER MY DIRECI101V IN CONFORMANCE' MY REQUIREMENTS OF 7HE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE Rfif fST OF RON HANSON /i MAY 2001 .KrNNETH W. VAN CLEAVE RAL.S. No.. 12199 w co • w . m 1 ' o TI SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECTION 5 FOUND BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE_ p 7N ,X• DATE VISITED SEPT.27, 1976.' _.. 7 19 8 N. 311656.611 E. 1274246.421) ea -to eES Be vnJ , LE 2 2 2000 io LE (O S 3 0• CrrY OF tbM6KE;E� b to zIN 1.) REVISED PER COMENTS R£CIEVED 4120101 OWN KVjr CHK KWV 51011 i AUDITOR' S CERTIFICATE In #O)p' FILED FOR RECORD THIS 1 DAY OF A4AR1 ,2001 AT Z' 20 .M. IN VOLUME OF SURVEYS AT N. 311124.811 I. PAGES ____....-____ AT THE REQUEST OF E. 1271458.450 7 8 RON HANSON , FOUNO BRASS DISK WITH *X*. IN WE. DATE VISITED. SEPT. Z 001 015 09 500 g 27, 1976. AUDITOR'S FEE No. 5/o8�af DEPUTY AUDITOR " ' C(WNTY AU01POR FOR PHASE ONE LTD C/O RON RANSON 10111 76t, p(mok) 20146 25TH NW SEATRE, WASHINGTON 98177 SURVEY FOR TIDELANDS LEASE No. '20-121.90 VAN CLEAVE AND ASSOCIATES 112 CANDLEWYCK DRIVE WEST L.AKEW000, . WASHINGTON 98499 (253) 588--3821 DWN By! i AM-KV JR. CKD BYt K.W.V. APPRVD BYt K.W.V. DATE' 05/00 DATE 05/00 DATE 0 M+....w. F.B Np.L.L/EFB SCALE: 1" 60' DWG NO, 01--905 \! Ih.c. 1890 CITE' OF EDMONDS 121 5TFi AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDs. wA 9eo2o • (425) 771.0220 - FAX (425) 771.0221 website. www.ci.edmond&wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering October 2$, r2009 Chevy Chase, PE, SE CG Engineering 250 41h Ave South,.Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Meadowdale Marina, 16111 76`t' Place West Dear MT. Chase, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR This letter is. in response to your letters dated October 2, 2009 (received October 8, 2009) and September 4, 2009. Repair of wood building Our understanding from your letters is that the owner desires to obtain a permit for limited repair of the existing wood building for the purpose of only maintaining the structural integrity of the building while permit applications (BLD20080693 & BLD20080694) are being processed. Also, the purpose of this repair permit would not be to bring the .building into full code compliance for occupancy; that would be, included in permit application BLD20080693 Since you confirm in your letter that the owner still intends to proceed with the project to replace the pier and repair the wood building for occupancy, those.permit applications (BLD20080693 & BLD20080694) must remain active. If the owner wishes to obtain a permit to only repair the structure to. prevent further damage as you describe in your letters; a new permit application would be required, including construction plans showing the proposed structural repair work to the building and temporary repair of the pier to provide safe egress, firefighter access, and City inspector access during construction. A water supply approved. by the Fire Marshal for fire protection during construction will also be required. In order to apply the City's non -conforming codes to the overall repair of the wood building, a written contractor's bid must be submitted at the time of permit application for the.all.of the work to be done to bring the building into compliance for occupancy. Thus bid must be itemized and broken down into three sections; .l) the repair permit to maintain structural integrity only, 2) the remaining work for occupancy (including but Incorporated August 11, 1,890 not limited to electrical, water, sewer, fire connection, fire sprinkler, fire alarm, plumbing, mechanical, etc.), and 3) the temporary repair of the pier for access as discussed in the previous paragraph. Any work proposed through a new building permit must be in compliance with the approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit that exists for the site (SM-05-94). This includes all conditions from the Hearing Examiner's decision of December 8, 2005, and the associated Biological Evaluation as well as those found in the permits from the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Ecology, etc. Please contact Mike Clugston, Planner, if you have questions. For purposes of inspecting the permitted work, City personnel will require access to and from the project site. Accordingly, please confirm in writing that the owner/applicant still has legal access across BNSF right-of-way, so we are assured that we are not trespassing when doing inspections. Please schedule an appointment with Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator for the project to submit the permit application. Also, please note the conditions of approval set forth in the previously -issued Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the project site. Nothing in this response or any subsequently issued building permit should be construed as waiving, limiting or otherwise relieving the owner/applicant's responsibility for fully complying these conditions. BNSF Railroad decision: Regarding your response to the third item where you state "The owner is awaiting a decision from BNSFRailroad before the response to the City's plan review comments can be completed. It is the owner's intent to submit the outstanding items at that time, we would like to clarify that the City is not requiring approval or a decision from BNSF Railroad to be submitted as part of the outstanding items to make the resubmittal complete so that plan review of the applications can continue. This item must be addressed prior to permit issuance. On June 5, 2009, Mr. Milosavljevic told staff at the public counter that it may take a long time to obtain BNSF approval. He was told by staff that response regarding BNSF approval (as note in Item 3 of plan review comments from the Engineering Division dated September 22, 2008), was not required for the resubmittal, but must be a ddressed/submitted prior to permit issuance. Mr. Milosavljevic also said he had not chosen a contractor yet, so could not submit the Special Inspection Agreement and signed Contractor's Acknowledgement Statement. Staff told him these items could also be submitted prior to permit issuance. This information was also emailed to you on August 10, 2009 by our Permit Coordinator. )Ian review comments for Buildinp_ :Permit The following is the list of remaining outstanding items that must be submitted to the City to make the resubmittal of B.LD20080693 and BLD20080694 complete so plan' review_ of these permit.applications can. continue (see email to you dated August 10, 2009) and to help assure. correction of the violation underlying the Notice of Civil Violation issued May 15, 2009 T. Written responses to all plan review comments (copies attached .for your convenience) as well as any plan changes necessary. 2. An itemized cost,estimate for both on=site and off -site improvements, including traffic control (Item l of Engineering Division comments dated 9/22/2008). 3. A Fire Connection permit application/plans.need to be submitted and ,issued with the main permit (Item 1 of Fire Department comments date 9/25/2008) Please feel free to contact us if you.have questions regarding -this. letter. Sincerely, X411- Ann Bullis, CBO Building Official cc: Vladan.Milosavljevic, Meadowdale Marina, LLC Mike Clugston, Planner Mike Smith, Acting Fire Marshal Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Mike. Thies, Code Enforcement Inspector Rob Chave, Planning Manager City Attorney Octaher.2, 2049. ENGINEERING" Ann Bullis _._.. •_ _ City of.Ed n9ii6 Building Division, 220 4`' Avenue South. Edmonds, WA 98032 Plan Check Number: 2009-0603 & 2008,0694 Project Name: Pier Replacement (0:694.) & Building Repair (0693) I Project Address: 16111 °76`' Ave W Dear Ms. BrllliS, itemized below is the response to the comments contoured in the September 18,'2009 letter for the above referenced project. 1 o Is the owner intending to alter the scope of work for current permit application i BLD20080693 for this repair, or submit a new permit application specifically for this: repair? Keep in mind that alterations must still be made to the wood building to accommodate construction of the pier as well as attachment to the pier, and must be:a separate permit from the pier construction since they are separate structures. : The owner would like to alter the scope of n,ork for the current permit application, (BLD 2008-0693) j o is it owner's intent that the scope of the subject repair permit includes bringing the i ( building into code compliance for occupancy? No. The scope of work would be to repair the structure to prevent further damage. The owner has had nearly a year to respond to the Cityt s plan review comments for both the pier (BLD20080694) and wood building (BLD20080693), and have only received a partial resubmittal. By making this request while permit applications for" the wood pier replacement and wood building repair are active, what is the owner's schedule to submit the outstanding items to make the resubmittal for these applications complete so the City can continue review? € ! The osvuer is �nvaiting «decision fi-our BNSF Railroad before the response to the City's plan review comments can be completed. It is the owner's intent to submit the outstanding items at that time. ,. -` o The current permit applications expire on August 12, 2010. Does the owner still intend " to proceed with the project to replace the pier and repair the wood building? I _ Yes. The owner intends to proceed with the pier replacement and mood building repair project. i If you have anyquestions.or comments regarding the:responses to this.,review please do not { hesitate to call. 250 4th'Ave:,$outh� : , Sincerely, I sui e'200 CG Engine iug j Edmonds: WA'06020'� Phone:;425.778:8500 Fax: 425.778.5536 C. Chevy Chase, PE, r Principal pl*� Zag-e��, n (ENGONcEERON G September 4, 2009 Ann Bullis, CBO Building Official City of Edmonds 121 51h Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Meadowdale Pier Dear Ann: 6 SEP 0 4 2009 The project owner (Mr. Milosavljevich) is requesting that the City allow a partial resubmittal in order to obtain a repair permit for the existing wood building. The objective is to prevent further damage of the building while the pier replacement permit is being processed. Currently the northeast portion of the structure is missing, which leaves the wood framing exposed to the weather. Because most of the framing is not preservative treated, the structural members are susceptible to further decay. The missing structure also leaves the building more vulnerable to further damage under high wind conditions. CG Engineering would revise the building repair drawings (sheets SR-1, SR-2 & SR-3) to show the repair work to be done while the existing wood pier is still in place. This would include details of the connection to the existing wood pier. Connection,to the new pier would be shown on the pier upgrade drawings and accomplished at the time it is constructed. Thank you for considering the owner's request. If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CG Engineering C. Chevy Chase, PE, SE Principal cc: Milo Milosavljevic 250 4th Ave. South Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 Phone: 425.778.8500 Fax: 425.778.5536 MCI -=,;;*I1' 2Jm CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSO MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT I� c. 1 g90 Planning • Building • Engineering September 18, 2009 Chevy Chase, PE, SE CG Engineering 250 4`h Ave S, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Meadowdale Marina, 16111 76`h Place West Dear Mr. Chase, The City received your letter dated September 4, 2009 requesting consideration of the City to allow a partial resubmittal in order to obtain a repair permit for the existing wood building. Staff met to discuss your letter and have the following questions before responding: Is the owner intending to alter the scope of work for current permit application BLD20080693 for this repair, or submit a new permit application specifically for this repair? Keep in mind that alterations must still be made to the wood building to accommodate construction of the pier as well as attachment to the pier, and must be a separate permit from the pier construction since they are separate structures. • Is it owner's intent that the scope of the subject repair permit include bringing the building into code compliance for occupancy? • The owner has had nearly a year to respond to the City's plan review comments for both the pier (BLD20080694) and wood building (BLD20080693), and have only received a partial resubmittal. By making this request while permit applications for the wood pier replacement and wood building repair are active, what is the owner's schedule to submit the outstanding items to make the resubmittal for these applications complete so the City can continue review? • The current. permit applications expire on August 12, 2010. Does the owner still intend to proceed with the project to replace the pier and repair the wood building? Please provide written responses to these questions, so that we may respond to your request. Sincerely, qbk- Ann Bullis, CBO Building Official Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan ncC.18913 August 27, 2009 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Websile: www.d.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Vladan Milosavljevic Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 RE: MEADOWDALE MARINA (1611176' PLACE WEST) Dear Mr. Milosavljevic: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR In an Order to Cease and Desist/Notice of Civil Penalty dated May 13, 2009, the City of Edmonds notified you that you were in violation of your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for Meadowdale Marina (SM-05- 94). As you are aware, no work at the site has been permitted by the City since the associated building permit applications needed to complete the work have not been approved and issued (BLD-2008-0693 and BLD- 2008-0694). This delay has not been caused by the City but rather because you have not responded to multiple City requests for additional information so that the review may continue regarding the permit applications. The building permit applications will expire on August 12, 2010, and be void. Without action on the building permit applications, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for Meadowdale Marina (SM-05-94) will also expire on August 12, 2010, and be void. Please keep in mind, because you have not completed the associated building permit applications and you did not appeal nor apply to the City for remission or mitigation of the $500 per day civil penalty associated with the violation within the specified time period, penalties continue to accrue as provided in the Order to Cease and Desist/Notice of Civil Penalty. As stated in the May 13, 2009 Order and Notice, the violation may only be corrected by obtaining building permit approval to perform the work identified in the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-05-94) pursuant to the timelines identified in the associated Biological Evaluation. As indicated in the May 13 Order and Notice, the City is currently instituting a review of the approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit pursuant to Chapter 20.100 ECDC. A Notice of Civil Violation was also posted on Ma 14.2009 for failure to obtain a building permit for the pier repair work. Since you did not appeal this notice by May 27, 2009, penalties continue to accrue at the rate of $100 per dayas provided in the notice. If you have any questions, please contact me at 425-771-0220. Sincerel , Michael D. Clugston, AICP Planner Cc: City of Edmonds Code Enforcement . City of Edmonds Building Division • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Citu - HPkinan .Taman Cc: City of Edmonds Code Enforcement . City of Edmonds Building Division David Pater Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Department of Ecology 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Laura Arber Washington Dept of Fish and Wildlife North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012=1296 Michelle Walker Chief, Regulatory Branch Department of the Army Seattle District, Corps of Engineers PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Keith P. Scully Gendler & Mann, LLC 1424 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1015 Seattle, WA 98101 Zach Lell Ogden Murphy Wallace P.L.L.C. 1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 2100 Seattle, WA. 98101 I Inc.18913 May 13, 2009 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 STH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering Vladan Milosavljevic Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 RE: MEADOWDALE MARINA (1611176TH PLACE WEST) ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST / NOTICE OF CIVIL PENALTY Dear Mr. Milosavljevic: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Based on observations of the project by City staff on May 4 and 7, 2009, it has been determined that you are in violation of your Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for Meadowdale Marina (SM- 05-94). The enclosed photographs taken on May 41h and May 7`h clearly indicate new work having been done at the site within the waters of Puget Sound, specifically the installation of at least three new concrete footings for new pilings under the trestle portion of the pier. As you are aware, no work at the site has been permitted by the City since the associated building permits needed to complete the work have not been issued (BLD-2008-0693 and BLD-2008-0694). This delay has not been caused by the City but rather because you have not responded to multiple City requests for additional information regarding the permits. With respect to the Shoreline Permit violation, Condition 4 of the Hearing Examiner's approval of SM-05-94 states: "The project must implement the ESA requirements and/or agreements set forth in the Biological Evaluation, Proposed Repairs, Meadowdale Pier, Edmonds, Washington, dated June 17, 2005 in their entirety., The project will also have to comply with any conditions placed on it by the Army Corp of Engineers, Washington State Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, and Natural Resources, and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service including times of year the proposed work may take place. Attachment B to the Biological Evaluation referenced in SM-05-94, Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for Meadowdale Pier, states in the Conclusions on Page 3: "Timing windows will be in place to minimize adverse affects on juvenile salmon and to protect ground fish habitats." (Attachment 1) The timing window is clearly defined in the associated permits from the Army Corps (Attachment 2) and from the Washington State Departments of Ecology and Fish and Wildlife (Attachments 3 & 4) which indicate that work below the OHWM cannot occur at the site between February 16 and July 15 of any year in order to protect juvenile salmon. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Pursuant to WAC 173-27 and RCW 90.58, all nonpermitted work at Meadowdale Marina shall immediately cease and desist. The WAC and RCW allow the City to seek both civil and criminal penalties as a result of this violation. Based on the apparently willful nature of the violation in disregarding the permitted timeframe to perform the work allowed by the shoreline permit, the fact that the work was performed without valid building permits, and the potentially significant impact of the violation upon juvenile salmon and the shoreline environment, a civil penalty of $500 per day is hereby issued and will accrue each day the violation persists from the date of this notice until the violation is corrected. This violation may only be corrected by obtaining building permit approval to perform the work identified in the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM-05-94) pursuant to the timelines identified in the associated Biological Evaluation. You may apply to the City for remission or mitigation of this civil penalty within 30 days after receipt of this notice. The City may remit or mitigate the penalty only upon a demonstration of extraordinary circumstances, such as the presence of information or factors not considered in setting the original penalty. You may also appeal this notice to the Edmonds City Council. The deadline for filing an appeal is 30 days after receipt of this notice unless you have applied for remission or mitigation of the penalty amount as indicated above. In that event, the deadline for filing an appeal to the Edmonds City Council is 30 days after receipt of the City's determination regarding your application for remission or mitigation of the penalty amount. Issuance of this civil penalty does not preclude the City from seeking criminal redress. The City is also instituting a review of the approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit pursuant to Section 20.100.040 ECDC. If you have any questions, please contact me at 425-771-0220. Sincerely�,,� Michael D. Clugston, AICP Planner Enclosures Cc: City of Edmonds Code Enforcement City of Edmonds Building Division David Pater Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Department of Ecology 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Laura Arber Washington Dept of Fish and Wildlife North Puget Sound 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012-1296 Michelle Walker Chief, Regulatory Branch Department of the Army Seattle District, Corps of Engineers PO Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755 Keith P. Scully Gendler & Mann, LLC 1424 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1015 Seattle, WA 98101 *, Umbaugh, Theresa From: McConnell, Jeanie Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:00 AM To: 'Jared Underbrink' Cc: mike m; Chevy Chase: Clugston, Michael; Smith, Mike, Chave, Rob; Thies, Mike; Umbaugh, Theresa; E3Iorback, Leif Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina - bld20080693 & bld20080694 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged .tared, Are you able to provide us with a status update on this project? Do you know if BNSF has given approval for the driveway crossing yet? From what I can, tell the attached letter of October 26, 2009 is the last correspondence we've had on the project. I haven't had a chance to check in with Permit Coordinator Theresa Umbaugh on the status of the project application, but I'll ask that she responds to this e-mail with that information. The engineers cost estimate for the project should include the typical civil utility and road improvements as well as the repairs to the access portion of the pier. The City will still need a project valuation, which is different than the engineers estimate. Please contact Theresa Umbaugh with any further questions you may have on this. Thanks, Jeanie -----Original Message ----- From: Jared Underbrink [maiIto: Jared U a cgengineering.comj Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 10:39 AM To: McConnell, Jeanie Cc: mike m; Chevy Chase Subject: Meadowdale Marina Jeanie, My company has been working on the Meadowdale Marina project (bld2008O694) but I had not been very involved up until this point. I had a question about the cost estimate and how we need to approach it. Typically on a site when we provide the cost estimate for bonding we are itemizing the site work, not including the cost for any structures. For this project however, the majority of the "site" is a new pier structure. Does the cost estimate we will make as a response to this comment on your need to include the concrete slab, piling, building repairs, etc? If it does not, the cost estimate will include site prep, TESC, storm drainage, sewer, water and anything else typical to a civil cost estimate. We will divide it into onsite and off site, and make the necessary bonding/inspection markups. Thanks, Jared Underbrink, EIT Design Engineer P: 425.778.85001 F: 425.778,5536 250 0' Ave. South, Suite 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 3/29/2010 In q�,� C. .19, C, ITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKEN80N MAYOR. 1215TH AVENUE NORTH , EDMONDS. WA 98020 -1(425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT'SERVICES'DEPARTMENT Planning' - Building - Engine . e I ring 'October 28,.2009 Chevy. Chase; PE, SE CG Engineering 250 4'1i.Ave: South, Suite 200' Edmonds, WA 98,020 R-E: meadowdale M 1 1641.1. 76tt Place West 4rina, Dear Mn Chase, This letter is in- response to your letters dated October, 2,.2009 (received, October 8. 2009) and September pte iber. 4, 20,09, Repair,�of woodcbuilding, Out.' understanding from your letters is that,the-Owner desires lo obtain. a pefrnit,'fo.v firinitod repair of the.,ekisting,wwoo.d building for thepurpose of only maintaining the structural, integrity of the: building while permit applications (j3LD20080691-& BLD2 08'0694),ar d. Also 4he purpose of this repair permit would not be 9 being processed: p to, bring the,bifilding.1irito full. code compliance f6r;occupancy;1 that would.:be,:ih6luded in pernut applicatibnBLD200806.93. Since nce you confirm in your letter.,that the owner still -intends to proceed with the project; to replace the vier and repair the wood, building for OCcupancy,�those,,peTmit.ai)vlications (BLD20080693,,& BLD20080694):,mustremain active. If the owner wishes to obtaiha permit toonly,,reP air. the structure:to Prevent further darei na �as you describe in yquyour'. letters;.anew permit application Would be'fbqUired.including construction plans. showing, , the:prqposed 9tructutal.repair work to the building and te.mporaryrppai r of the oier,:to ... provide safe earess, firefighter access, and City inspector-,access.during construction. -A water supply approvey I &b the.Fire.Maishalkrfire protection duting.,construction.. will also be required. In wood order to, n repair ofthe. .ap,plyt,heC�'ty's'non-conforiyii gcodesto,the building, a written contractor's bid must.be submitted at the time=of permit applicEition, for the all of the he work to'be done to.;bring-,the building into compliance :for occupancy. This bid must be itemized :dnd'broiktmdown into three, sections; .1)the 'repair: permit: to maintain structural integrity. only.,_2 the remaining works for -occupancy (including, but Incorporated August 1J, 1890 not limited to electrical, water, sewer, fire connection, fire sprinkler, fire alarm, plumbing, mechanical, etc.), and 3) the temporary repair of the pier for access as discussed in the previous paragraph. Any work proposed through a new building permit must be in compliance with the approved Shoreline Substantial Development Permit that exists for the site (SM-05-94). This includes all conditions from the Hearing Examiner's decision of December 8, 2005, and the associated Biological Evaluation as well as those found in the permits from the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Ecology, etc. Please contact Mike Clugston, Planner, if you have questions. For purposes of inspecting the permitted work, City personnel will require access to and from the project site. Accordingly, please confirm in writing that the owner/applicant still has legal access across BNSF right-of-way, so we are assured that we are not trespassing when doing inspections. Please schedule an appointment with Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator for the project to submit the permit application. Also, please note the conditions of approval set forth in the previously -issued Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the project site. Nothing in this response or any subsequently issued building permit should be construed as waiving, limiting or otherwise relieving the-owner/applicant's responsibility for fully complying these conditions. BNSF Railroad decision: Regarding your response to the third item where you state "The owner is awaiting a decision from BNSF Railroad before the response to the City's plan review comments can be completed It is the owner's. intent to submit the outstanding items at that time," we would like to clarify that the City is not requiring approval or a decision from BNSF Railroad to be submitted as part of the outstanding items to make the resubmittal complete so that plan review of the applications can continue. This item must be addressed prior to permit issuance. On June 5, 2009, Mr. Milosavljevic told staff at the public counter that it may take a long time to obtain BNSF approval. He was told by staff that response regarding BNSF approval (as note in Item 3 of plan review comments from the Engineering Division dated September 22, 2008), was not required for the resubmittal, but must be addressed/submitted prior to permit issuance. Mr. Milosavljevic also said he had not chosen a contractor yet, so could not submit the Special Inspection Agreement and signed Contractor's Acknowledgement Statement. Staff told him these items could also be submitted prior to permit issuance. This information was also emailed to you on August 10, 2009 by our Permit Coordinator. The f.o Ij'o—�ngiS the J1isi.ofremain ing outstanding ,item s,,thit.thist be stbmitted,tdthe City to make the resubmittal 6f,BLD200806q3'.:Efiid.BLD20080694. complete -so vlan, review ofthese permit applications can continue�,(see email to.:you datcd August' 1:0,, ,200,9) arid: to help assure -correction :of the violation underlying the Noticeof Civil Violationis'siied May 15, 2069;;Z 11, Wriftenresponses, to all plan review cominenM(copiesiattac I hed.fOr Y,,6,qr convenience) ,;as well as.any plan chan esnecpssaTy,,, 2. An itemized co stestimate for both on=site and off7site imprQvements; including traffic control (item'.1 ,OtEngineeti�ng-Divisi6n.cominents dated 9/22/2008). 31. A Fire. Connection, perrnitapplicAtioWplam need,to" be submitted,and:issiJed With, the main pormi.t(ltem .1. of Fire Department cornrhentsdate 9W/2008): Please feelfree to: contact ,-u-sif vou.have questions regardingthis letter. Sincerely, Ann Bullis. CBO Building Official cc:; Vladan Milosaylievic, Meadow4ale Marina, LL!Q Mike. Clugston, Planner Mike Smith,' Acting Fire Marshal Jeanie McConnell, Engifieering Program Manager Mike. Thies, ' Diforcemen.t. Inspector Rob Cbave lanning'Manager City Attorney CITY OF EDMONDS PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS - _ - ENGINEERING DIVISION csK90 (425) 771-0220 City Website: wwwxi.edbnonds.wa.us DATE: September 25, 2008 TO: Mr. Milosaveljevic Meadowdale Marina LLC milollc@yahoo.com FROM: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager RE: Application #: bld2008O693 Project: Meadowdale Marina — Repair Woodframe Building Project Address: 16111. 76"' Ave W During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit three (3) sets of revised plans/documents with a written response to each of the items below to Theresa Umbaugh. City of Edmonds handouts and standard details can be referenced on the City website under Development Services Department, Engineering Division. I . All utility work is being reviewed under permit application bld2008O694 for the pier replacement project. Please add a note to these plans referencing the associated utility work under separate permit. 2. Provide a sequence or phasing of construction for the pier replacement and building repairs. 3. Provide an erosion control plan. 4. Provide a traffic control and haul route plan. Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections. 76th Pl W-I61 1 I_bld20080693_Mead Marina e-mailed 9/25108 Paget of t EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 25, 2008 To: Building Department/File From: Mike Smith, Acting Fire Marshal 425-775-7720 Subject: Plan Check 2008-0693 Meadowdale Marina The submitted plans have been reviewed under the 2006 IFC, the ECDC and NFPA 303 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards. 1) A Fire Connection Permit will be required and must be issued with the building permits. Please refer to the City's handout. 2) Per NFPA 303 a Class I Standpipe System will be required. This is a deferred submittal and can be designed by your fire sprinkler contractor. 3) Permit for Fire Sprinkler Modification is required and can be a deferred submittal. Since fire sprinkler systems already exist you will need to submit new Sprinkler Hydraulic Calculations to justify the downsizing of the fire main to these systems. 4) A Fire Alarm Permit will be required for Sprinkler Monitoring and other devices per NFPA 72. 5) During Demolition and Construction a Fire Prevention Program Superintendent appointed by the building owner will be required (2006 IFC Section 1408). Have this person call me prior to construction for instructions. 6) Designated Fire Lanes and stripping will be required. Contact me for specifics. 7) A Fire Department Lock Box will be required for emergency access. Call my office for authorization to purchase a box from our vendor. 8) In the permits and correspondence it appears you plan to return the project to its original condition. Are there plans for repairing, fueling and maintenance on boats, reopening bait and tackle shop, an eating establishment, etc? These should be addressed as soon as possible. As the review process continues other issues and requirements will be addressed. �0 City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: October 16, 2008 TO: Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 FROM: Ann Bullis, Building Official RE: Plan Check: 2008-0693 & 2008-0694 .Project: Pier Replacement (0694) & Building Repair (0693) Project Address: 16111 76"' Ave W During review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the changes can be found on the plans, and submit revised plans/documents to a Permit Coordinator. Pier Replacement (2008-0694) 1. Sheet G-1: a. Under Scope of Work, add the following to the end of the second to last sentence: The existing wood building..... throughout construction of the pier and repair of'the building. b. Under Scope of Work, add the following to the end of the last sentence: The existing concrete pier ....... and no work is to be clone to the pier or building. c. On the site plan, move the "separate permit" note under the repair note for the building to eliminate confusion. d. On the site plan highlight the pier replacement area of work under this permit to distinguish from the existing steel pier and building where no work will be done. e. Under the Separate Permits list, add fire sprinkler modifications, fire alarm modifications, State electrical, 2. On Sheet C2.1, show the fire sprinkler line branch to the wood building (currently there is only a branch to the south building). 3. As discussed in a meeting with Milo, provide a statement on the plans as to how the pier will be used. 4. Special Inspections are required for all items noted on Sheet S1.1. City Consultant Comments for Pier Replacement 1) Provide signed contractor's acknowledgement statement per 1BC 1706. 2) The concrete specified on Sheet S 1 1 and used for inside the steel piles and for the concrete frame work above should be specified for use in salt water environments. Similar corrosion provisions should be specified for the steel construction including handrails, couplers, chain anchors, and other connectors and anchors. 3) 1 do not have access to RAM software information about what the output is in the engineer's design for the inverted pendulum. Could they please show me what exactly the following are and where they occur relative to the floor plan on Sheets 2-013 to 2-01.5: a) How the - base - of the inverted pendulum was determined given that the lengths of the piles are different relative to the sea bed and that the upper portions of the sand which give little lateral support to the structure also vary in their depth? ASCE 7 Section 12.2.5.3 b) Exactly where the center of mass is located relative to the center of rigidity. That eccentricity is what will provide the inherent tensional moment for the pier. ASCE Section 12.8.4.1 c) The - accidental torsion - is determined by 5% of the parallel or perpendicular direction lengths and is additive to the - inherent torsional moment - of the pile. Section 12.8.4.2. The information given on Calculation sheets seem to miss the - inherent torsional moments or assume that it is the - accidental torsion. d) The resulting movement for that design should result in some way to ensure the utilities shown on Sheet C2.1 do not fail in such a seismic event as predicted by the design procedure by the use of expansion joints or flexible materials or other means. Repair of Wood, Building (2008-0693) 5. As noted in the Preapplication Comments dated December 20, 2007, and discussed at our recent meeting, provide a floor plan, show all walls and label the uses of space, note the Type of Construction, existing and proposed occupancies, occupant load calculations, number of stories, show all exits, exit signage, emergency lighting, interior and exterior finishes, accessibility requirements, etc. 6. Show location of restroom facilities and provide resiroom calculations per WAC 51-50 Chapter 29. 7. Provide elevation views, including exterior finishes. 8. Provide written itemized contractor's bid for the proposed repair of the building. 9. Provide an appraisal (by a certified appraiser) for the building to be repaired. 10. If any portion of the building will be heated, note the proposed type of heating system on the plans, show the location of the heating unit(s) on the plans, note the insulation R-values on the plans and show how/where insulation will be installed with details, and complete the Non - Residential Energy Code forms on the following website: llttp://www.neec.net/resources/resources.htmi. If the building will not be heated, note on the plans. WSEC 1132 11. The Interior and Exterior Lighting Summary Forms submitted are incomplete. Please submit complete forms. 12. You noted at the meeting that the building will be used for boat storage. Show how the boats will be stored. How will boats be moved in an out of the storage building? If with a fork lift, how is it powered? How will boats be lifted in and out of the water? Will any fuel or other hazardous materials be stored on site'? 1f so, show the location, type and quantities. 13. Specify bolts installed in concrete. Special inspection will be required. 14. Please revise structural evaluation report of the wood building to reference the IBC since the City (nor State) has not adopted the IEBC. Page 2 of 3 City Consultant Comments for Wood Building 1. I have read through the Assessment Report and generally the recommendations therein are satisfactory. However, I do have some specific comments that need to be addressed before I can completely state that yet complies with code provisions. 2. You told me that the City of Edmonds has not adopted the International Existing Building Code. As the designers cite the IEBC in their set of calculations, this fact should be pointed out to the designers and the plans and calculations need to be revised. However, everything that applies can be found in IBC Chapter 34. 3. Note 3/SR-2 uses the term - in like kind- for the rebuilding of the damaged portion of the structure. Chapter 34 of the fBC does not use that term (neither does the IEBC as far as I can read) - See Section 3403.2. Their interpretation of the IEBC was that nothing has to be done extra with the building if they build it back as it was originally constructed. But Section 3403.2 actually means that they need to make sure that the portion of the structure the addition connects to has a consistent load path that provides resistance from the wind pressures resistance through shear wall action into existing shear walls and -or uplift to the deck level. 4. The 20 d nails shown in Section t/SR-3 and should also be evaluated to what the existing construction actually used was. In addition, such nails will have to be predrilled as indicated in the NDS and the minimum embedment needs to be shown on that cut Section. 5. The 20 d nails shown in Section I/SR-3 and should also be evaluated to what the existing construction actually used. Additionally, such nails will have to be predrilled as indicated in the NDS and the embedment show on the Section, at least, needs to be identified. Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMONDS - 121 5"' AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS WA 98020 PHONE: 425.771.0220 - FAX: 425.771.0221 - WEB : www.ci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING - BUILDING January 29, 2009 Vladan Milosavljevic Meadowdale Marina, LLC 23423 Brier Road Brier, WA 98036 RE: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS 3 FOR PLAN CHECK # 2008-0693 REPAIR OF TIMBER BUILDING AT MEADOWDALE MARINA 16111 76T1I PLACE WEST Dear Milo: As you are aware, we are still anticipating receipt of an appraisal and cost estimate for repairs of the timber frame building. Without this information, we cannot continue our review of the building permit. The Hearing Examiner in his decision on the shoreline substantial development permit #SM-05-94 required this as a condition: "3. Prior to issuing any permits for the repair of the timber building, the applicant must submit an appraisal for the value of that structure. They must also submit an estimate for the cost to repair the building. As noted above if the timber structure is moved to allow for reconstruction of the pier, the building shall be demolished." That said, during a previous review of the plans resubmitted on December 22, 2008, the following concern was identified: 1. Uses within timber buildings: Sheet SR-2 shows an Existing Floor Plan with uses listed as "existing restaurant and bar" as well as "existing tackle and bait shop" and "existing storage", prestunably for boats. It is uncertain how these `existing' uses are being defined or where they have come from. Even assuming, without conceding, that these alleged uses of the structure may have occurred at some point in the past, after reviewing city business license records, it appears that there hasn't been a commercial business license for this site since at least 2001. further, there has been no reported commercial revenue from the property since 2001, f.,ikewise, the City's utility records indicate that utility service was discontinued in October 2001 at your request. Since the restaurant and bait shop uses are nonconforming, Section 23.10.220.E of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) applies. This section states: If a nonconforming use is discontinued for 12 consecutive months or for 12 months during any two-year period, any subsequent use shall be conforming. Because there are no permits or business licenses on file describing the `existing' uses, and because those uses have apparently been discontinued since at least October 2001, any nonconforming rights to those uses have expired. To be clear, any historical uses of the timber building have ceased and the nonconforming rights to them are no longer valid. Going forward, as stated above in 23.10.220.E, "any subsequent use shall be conforming" to applicable code requirements. In the case of Meadowdale Marina, the applicable requirements are those found in the Urban Mixed -Use II shoreline environment (ECDC 23.10.155) and the CW zone (ECDC 16.55) sections. Courtesy copies of these sections are enclosed for your information. The Hearing Examiner decision reemphasized this point. An important consideration in defining future uses for the timber building is that, per ECDC 23.10.155.17, overwater structures are not permitted within the Urban Mixed -Use II shoreline environment with the exception of: a. Moorage structures and facilities as regulated in ECDC 23.10.160. b. Public access as regulated in ECDC 23.10.145. c. Boat gear storage lockers not to exceed 18 square feet in area and three feet in height. Only one storage locker is permitted per boat slip. This provision does not apply under covered moorage structures. Most importantly, per ECDC 23.10.160.J, covered moorage is prohibited. If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Please make all submittals to a Development Services Permit Coordinator, Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. Sincerely, D/ Mike Clugston, AICP Planner Cc: Zach Lell, City Attorney Rob Chave, Planning Manager Duane Bowman, Development Services Director Enclosures FD. CITY OF EDMONDS PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ENGINEERING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 City Website: wwwxLedmonds.wa.us DATE: September 22, 2008 TO: Mr. Milosaveljevic Meadowdale Marina LLC milollc@yahoo.com FROM: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager RE: Application #: b1d20080694 Project: Meadowdale Marina - Repairs Project Address: 16111 76`I' Ave W During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit three (3) sets of revised plans/documents with a written response to each of the items below to Theresa Umbaugh. City of Edmonds handouts and standard details can be referenced on the City website under Development Services Department, Engineering Division. GENERAL 1. Please provide an itemized cost estimate for both on -site and off -site (right-of-way) improvements, including traffic control. o A bond is required to be placed for all right-of-way improvements. The amount of the bond will be based on 120% of the City approved estimate for all right-of-way improvements. The City will inform you of the appropriate bond amount after review of the cost estimate. Bond forms can be obtained from Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator — 425-771-0220 or umbau jzh @ ci.edmonds.wa.us o Inspection fees for this project will be calculated at 2.2% of the 120% City approved estimate for all improvements. 2. Please submit a traffic control plan for review and approval. 3. Separate approvals from Burlington Northern Sante Fe may be required for work within and/or adjacent to their right-of-way. Submit plans to BNSF and provide a copy of their approval to the City. 4. The grinder pump permit will need to be issued at the same time as the building permit. Please provide additional information, consistent with the requirements outlined in City handout #E61. 11 Provide design and calculations stamped by a licensed engineer I:1 Provide specs for specific grinder pump model 76th P1 W-16111_bld20080694_Mead Marina Page I of 3 Show pump.chamber on the plans and how it will be .installed ❑ All pipe and fittings for the grinder pump shall be 2-inch High-Mol (200 psi) polyethylene pipe from the grinder pump to the existing gravity sewer stub at the property line. 5. Please revise City signature block on civil plan sheets to say "Engineering Division" versus "Assistant City Engineer". 6. A separate Fire Connection permit is required and shall be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of this building permit. Please contact Theresa Umbaugh'for permit submittal requirements. 7. Storm Water Engineer Jerry Shuster is currently reviewing the sizing of the storm filter cartridges. Any comments will follow. G-1 COVER SHEET Please revise haul route #2 to require trucks to head south on 76"' Ave W to 196"' St SW. There is a weight limit of 10,000 GVW on North Meadowdale Rd. 2. Revise the Construction Sequence as follows: ADD: Schedule pre -construction meeting with City Engineering Division at 425-771-0220, ext. 1326. ADD: Review ESC notes. ADD: Call for utility locates. ADD: Install ESC measures and maintain dust control. ADD: Remove ESC measures once site has been permanently stabilized and construction has been completed. 3. Please indicate how piles being disposed of will be offloaded to a transport vehicle. Will this take place outside of Edmonds or on site? 4. List all entities having permitting authority over this project on the face of the plans. Please verify that right-of-way lines are shown accurately. It appears as though there is a gap between the east edge of the subject property and the 100' wide railroad right-of-way. The City of Edmonds also has right-of-way (751h Ave W) in this area which is not currently shown or is not clearly labeled. If the DCDA vault, domestic backilow and other private utilities are located within BNSF right-of-way; you will be required to obtain approval from BNSF. If any private utilities are located within the City of Edmonds right-of-way, you will be required to obtain a separate encroachment permit from the City. C11 CIVIL NOTES The General Notes appear to be standard plan notes, but are not necessarily applicable to this project. Please revise as necessary and as follows: # I — Revise to reference 2008 or Current WSDOT standards. #5 — Revise to require as -built drawings also be submitted to the City of Edmonds prior to final of the building permit. #17 — Revise notes to address direct release of the storm water from rooftops versus filtering storm water from decking. 427 — Revise to read a minimum of 2 weeks advance notice. #28 — Revise to read accepted by City of Edmonds and owners representative ... 76th PI W- t 6111 _W20080694_Mead Marina Page 2 of 3 #30 — Will a foam cushion also be placed between fire and domestic lines in the 18" galvanized CMP encasement that runs along the trestle? 2. Please revise the Storm Drainage notes to be consistent with the specific construction at this site. 3. Remove Sheet Index from this sheet. A complete index has been provided on sheet G1. C2.1 UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE PLAN The sanitary sewer force line shall be 2" High-Mol (200 psi) pipe. Force lines are typically buried at a 3' depth. It is understood that the force line, for the most part, will not be buried and will be enclosed in 8" sell. 40 PVC. The plans state the pipe will be attached to the pier per the structural plans. While Detail 4 on Sheet S3.2 shows the pipe under the pedestrian grating it does not indicate how the pipe will be attached. Sheet C2.2 indicates the pipe will be attached to a concrete or steel beam with a strap @ 4' on center. a. Please revise plan sheet C2.2 to reference appropriate details and plan sheets for pipe attachment. b. Indicate type of strap to be used in this application. c. Provide a detail of the pipe configuration in the 36" steel casement under the railroad tracks. d. Clearly indicate pipe size, material and bury depth for the section of sewer located between the 36" steel casement and the sewer main. 2. The City Public Works Department has TV'd as much of the existing sewer lateral as possible. They have determined the existing sewer connects to a City sewer manhole and does not wye into the sewer main as shown on the plans. G' sewer pipe runs out of the manhole for approximately 12' and then reduces to 4". At some point the existing 2" force line connects into this 4" pipe. Please revise the plans to show a new poly force line from private property directly into the manhole channel. The existing 4" and 6" pipes could be used as encasement. Where the 6" pipe and 2" force line tie into the manhole, the void area around the 2" force line should be mudded. 3. The existing double check detector assembly is an 8" assembly. City records indicate the backflow assembly was tested in 2005 and failed. A new assembly and vault, per City standard details E7.8 and E7.8.1, is required. 4. The existing domestic water meter is located in the existing double check vault. The 1" meter will need to be located outside of the vault in a separate meter box, per City standards. 5. An RPBA in a hot box is required immediately after the meter, per City standard detail ET l 1 (above ground) or E7.11.2 (for semi -buried). 6. Provide a detail on how the downspouts will be routed to the Sound. Will the downspout pipe run through the interior of the building or through the concrete topping slab? 7. Provide a detail on how the storm water will discharge from the storm filter catch basins into the Sound. Will there actually be an outlet pipe? 8. it is noted the concrete apron at the railroad tracks is to be replaced. Please indicate concrete thickness required at this location. 9. Any deteriorated sections in the existing driveway approach off 76"' PI W shall be overlayed per City standards. Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections. 76th Pl W-161 1 1_W20080694_Mead Marina Page 3 of 3 os.D CITY OF EDMONDS ti. ° PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ENGINEERING DIVISION <=sr. i hqo (425) 771-0220 CityWebsite: wwwxi.edmonds.wa.us DATE: October 3, 2008 TO: File FROM: Jerry Shuster, P.E., Storrnwater Engineering Program Manager RE: Application #: BLD20080694 Project: Andersen Meadowdale Marina Project Address: 16111 76"' Pl. W .During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications are needed. Item reviewed: • Drainage Report & Calculations dated April 22, 2008 • Plan sheets C2.1-C2.2 Drainage Report & Calculations I . Page 1, 3"" Paragraph states that the six-month 24-hour storm is equal to 1.28". Edmonds Municipal code defines this storm as a 1.0 inch rainfall event over a 24-hour period using the SCS type I A rainfall distribution. The water quality storm flow rate should be re- calculated using the lower precipitation value. The model should be run separately for each area that is draining to a stormwater filtration catch basin. 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the planned stormwater treatment devices must be included in the drainage plan. Plan Sheet C2.1 The plan sheet should call out the location and type of each stormwater filtration catch basin device and not say "Typ. (2)-places." Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections. EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: September 25, 2008 To: Building Department/File, From: Mike Smith, Acting Fire Marshal 425-775-7720 Subject: Plan Check 2008-0693 Meadowdale Marina The submitted plans have been reviewed under the 2006 IFC, the ECDC and NFPA 303 Fire Protection Standard for Marinas and Boatyards. 1) A Fire Connection Permit will be required and must be issued with the building permits. Please refer to the City's handout. 2) Per NFPA 303 a Class I Standpipe System will be required. This is a deferred submittal and can be designed by your fire sprinkler contractor. 3) Permit for Fire Sprinkler Modification is required and can be a deferred submittal. Since fire sprinkler systems already exist you will need to submit new Sprinkler Hydraulic Calculations to justify the downsizing of the fire main to these systems. 4) A Fire Alarm Permit will be required for Sprinkler Monitoring and other devices per NFPA 72. 5) During Demolition and Construction a Fire Prevention Program Superintendent appointed by the building owner will be required (2006 IFC Section 1408). Have this person call me prior to construction for instructions. 6) Designated Fire Lanes and stripping will be required. Contact me for specifics. 7) A Fire Department Lock Box will be required for emergency access. Call my office for authorization to purchase a box from our vendor. 8) In the permits and correspondence it appears you plan to return the project to its original condition. Are there plans for repairing, fueling and maintenance on boats, reopening bait and tackle shop, an eating establishment, etc? These should be addressed as soon as possible. As the review process continues other issues and requirements will be addressed. - -- CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5`' AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS; WA 98020 PHONE: 425.771.0220 • FAx: 425.771.0221 - WEB: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING • BUILDING September 18, 2008 Vladan Milosavljevic MIR Enterprises nmilollc@yahoo.com RE: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR PLAN CHECK # 2008-0694 REPLACEMENT OF PILINGS AND DECKING AT MEADOWDALE MARINA 1611170"' PLACE WEST Dear Milo: 1 have reviewed the above building permit application for the Planning Division. Before I can sign off on the permit, however, the following information needs to be clarified: 1. Ecology Permit #3388: Please submit a signed and dated copy of Attachment A, the signature page that accompanies the Department of Ecology's Order #3388. 2. DNR Lease: Condition #1 of the Hearing Examiner's approval of SM-05-94 states that " [tjhe Applicant shall provide proof of the Department of Natural Resources lease that allows the pier facility to project beyond its property lines." Please submit documentation indicating such DNR approval. Make all submittals to a Development Services Permit Coordinator, Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:30 pm, except on Wednesdays when we are closed for permit review. if you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220. Sincerely, Mike Clugston, AICP Planner Umbaugh, Theresa From: Clugston, Michael Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 5:15 PM To: 'Zach Lell' NOT FOR PUBLIC Cc: Bjorback, Leif; Umbaugh, Theresa Subject: RE: Meadowdale Marina timelines INFORMATION Zach, I was asked to determine what the timelines are with respect to Meadowdale Marina and the SMP. Here's what I've come up with... 1. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SSDP) timeline started on February 15, 2006, which was the effective date of the permit per RCW 90.58.140(6). However, per WAC 173-27-090 - Time requirements of permit - it doesn't appear that the SSDP has started at all because Milo is still trying to acquire 'other governmental permits and approvals' such as building permits per (4). As I read it, the SSDP timeline is effectively stayed until he receives all other permits. Once he gets all other permits, the SSDP timeline would start and allow 2 years for construction to commence and 5 years of 'authorization to conduct development activities' - each with a possible one year extension. (2) Construction activities shall be commenced or, where no construction activities are involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. However, local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the substantial development permit and to the department. (3) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a substantial development permit. However, local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and to the department. (4) The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of filing as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6). The permit time periods in subsections (2) and (3) of this section do not include the time during which a use or activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions or due to the need to obtain any other government permits and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed, including all reasonably related administrative or legal actions on any such permits or approvals. 2) Fish and Wildlife approval of the associated HPA permit (#103687-2) is valid through January 25, 2011. The original HPA was valid from January 26, 2006 through December 31, 2008. RCW 77.55.021(5a) and (5b) seem to provide a 2- year and 5-year timeline but RCW 77.55.151 seems to indicate that HPA permits for marinas are renewable 5-year permits for regular maintenance activities like piling replacement. 3) Army Corps permit (200500779) seems to have expired on January 18, 2010. It is unknown whether Milo applied for an extension. 4) If I recall correctly, his building permits expire on August 12, 2010. Do you have a feeling for how the expired Corps permit may affect him? Will the expiration of the building permits mean expiration of the SSDP? It seems to me if he tried: to get (or received) other approvals and either let them expire or they were denied, the 5-year SSDP 'authorization to conduct development activities' would kick in an mean that the SSDP would expire on February 15, 2011 - five years from.the effective date of the SSDP. As always, all help on this one is most appreciated. Mike Clugston, AICP Planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department P: 425-771-0220 1 F: 425-771-0221 michael.cugston@ci.edmonds.wa.us ,,I Army Corp permit Meadowdale.pd... -----Original Message ----- From: Umbaugh, Theresa Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:24 AM To: Clugston, Michael Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: Meadowdale Marina Don't forget to let me know whether or not all of the SEPA, Fish, Shoreline, etc... permits/applications expire with the building applications.. Thank you! Theresa M. Umbaugh Senior Pennit Coordinator urnbaL1gh@ci.edrnonds.wa.us *************** -COMM. JOURNAL-q******************* DATE DEC-15-2005 ***** TIME 12:48 *** P.01 MODE = MEMORY TRANSMISSION START=DEC-15 12:36 END=DEC-15 12:46 FILE NO.= 194 • STN NO. COM RBBR NO. STATION NAME/TEL.NO. PAGES DURATION 001 OK a 93169194 010/010 00:08,591, FoV EbAfO �. City of Edmonds v H Development Services Department Building -Engineering -Planning A 121 5'" Avenue North •2n0 Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Zoe t g9p Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 XCOVER PAGE To: From: CT L W a z I Date Transmitted: )AIS105 1 Recipient's Fax No: '42S TM-- + I No. of Pages: NJ • (including cover page.) If there are any problems during transmission or documents are received incomplete, please call 426. 771.0220 and ask for: Subject: AS, —t' ke I A MCL.� LCM fro a.t �f �T/LoL, 7077 S �k� — I— ,h(L . L:TempllanaRormsl1)SFAX 12/14/20D5 8:38 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-771-0221 PAGE: 001 OF 004 • • FR TIER DUSTERS. RECEIVED Mitch Powlas Frontier Adjusters of Seattle/Lynnwood 4 2005 13300 Bothell Everett Hwy. #622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 Phone (425) 337-7262 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. FAX (425) 316-9194 CITY OF EDMONDS MPOWLAS@honderadjusters.com I FACSIMILE TRANSMITAL SHEET -NOTICE OF CONFIDENTL4LITY i TO Jeannine Graf, Building Official ; Today's December 14, 2005 City of Edmonds, WA Date Development Services Department 121 5th Avenue North - 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Fax # ' i' 425-771-0221 Telephone # i 425-771-0220 Insured Meadowdale Marna LLC Date of Loss :! October 24, 2005 Carrier I Rainier Insurance Claim No ' 05-4670466 Property STEPANOVIC SLOBODANKA / Property 16111 76TH PL W Owner MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC Address EDMONDS, WA 98020 i '------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUEST FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE —BUILDING RECORDS ALSO SENT VIA E-MAIL TO: GrafAcLedmonds.wa.us Mr. Graf: Please review the attached request and let me know if you have any questions. If I have selected the wrong office for this request please accept my apologies and direct me to the correct office. COPY Mary Bertram (Via e- Claims Manager mail) Rainier Insurance Company TO: 1411 SW Morrison ST, Suite 400 Portland, OR 97205-1945 (800) 527-7397 MBERTRAM(diredshield.com Sincerely, Mitch Powlas • NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY -THE DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING THIS TELECOPY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL ANWOR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ON THIS TRANSMISSION SHEET (S). IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, BE AWARE THAT ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS INFORMATION IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS TELECOPY IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE IMMEDIATELY SO THAT WE CAN ARRANGE FOR THE RETRIEVAL OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AT NO COST TO YOU. 12/14/2005 8:38 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-771-0221 PAGE: 002 OF 004 C: • CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS fit" . j 4 1jb,,5 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR MONDS PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Date of Request: _ December 14, 2005^ Requester Name: _ MITCH POWLAS _ Requester Address: __13300 BOTHELL EVERETT HWY., PMB 622_ Street SuitelApt. _ MILL CREEK __WA_ _98012-5314_ City State Zip Phone Number: (425) 337-7262_ _ Request Made: [ ] In Person [ ] In Writing [ ] Telephone [x] Fax NATURE OF REQUEST: (Please be as specific as possible with the type of information you are requesting; include address of property, file name or number, owner of property, time period, etc.): I am an insurance adjuster working on behalf of Rainier Insurance. Rainier Insurance recently wrote property insurance coverages for MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC. The address of the property is 16111 76TH PL W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98020. The Legal Description of the parcel is MEADOWDALE TIDELANDS BLK 001 D-00 - ALL LTS 7-11 INC BLK A. A claim has been presented for damage by Meadowdale Marina LLC During the course of investigating this claim we have learned that the property may have been "Red Tagged." By the Building Department of the City of Edmonds Rainier Insurance has asked my office to look into this and to make a Request For Public Disclosure for a copy of all records from the City of Edmonds Building Department with respect to this property from 05/30/2001 to present. Specifically Rainier Insurance is seeking information on why the property has been "Red Tagged" as well as any other building violations that may have been identified with respect to this property. Rainier Insurance understands that there may be a charge for copying these records. Please let me know the cost of copying these records and I will see that a check is sent to your offices. Owner is. STEPANOVIC SLOBODANKA / MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC Is the information requested a list of individuals to be used for a mailing list for commercial purposes? No Signature of Person Making Request I-ageI 12/14/2005 8:38 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-771-0221 PAGE: 003 OF 004 1 2 3 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ACTION ON REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS (SEE R.C.W. 42.17.320) Request received by: - - ---- Department: --� - Date: f Action taken: 4ARequest granted. [ ] Acknowledgment. Estimated response date provided. (See No. 4) [ ] Record denied. (See Nos. 5 & 6) [ ] Record withheld in part. (See Nos. 5 & 6) Request forwarded to attorney for review: [ ] Yes Date Forwarded: [ ] No 4. Notification to requester of action taken [ ] Request granted. [ ] Need for additional time. How long? [ ] Request denied. [ ] Record withheld in part. 5. If additional time needed, explain why: Date of Notification: • 6. If request denied or record withheld in part, name the exemption contained in Chapter 42.17 RCW which authorizes withholding or denial: 7. If request denied or record withheld in part, explain how the exemption applies to this record: FEES 0 - 5 copies free Standard copy charge @ $.15 per page: $ Other (Refer to current Records Index & Fee Schedule) $ TOTAL FEES DUE: $ Receipt No ------------ Date_____ I.�- DOCUMENTS PROVIDED: Date 16 4)_05 El Mailed Picked Up Page 2 12/14/2005 8:38 AM FROM: FRONTIER OF SEA-LYNN Frontier Adjusters TO: 425-771-0221 PAGE: 004 OF 004 Note: This form needs to be completed oniv if the request is for a mailing list of • individuals to be used for commercial purposes. EDMONDS PUBLIC RECORDS ACCESS DECLARATION TO RELEASE PUBLIC RECORDS (PRINT NAME) 1. 1 have requested copies of the following public records: -------------------------------- -------------------------------- 2. 1 understand that Washington State law, RCW 42.17.260(g), prohibits the use of lists of individuals for commercial purposes. 3. 1 understand that the use for commercial purposes of said records may also violate the rights of the individuals named therein and may subject me to liability for • such commercial use. 4. 1 understand that section 2 and 3 herein apply when I use said records for commercial purposes and when others use said records or copies for same for commercial purposes. I understand that I may be liable in.either case. PJ 5. 1 understand that "commercial purposes" means that the person requesting the record intends that the list will be used to communicate with the individuals named in the record for the purpose of facilitating profit expecting activity. 6. Therefore, I do hereby swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will not use said records for commercial purposes and that further, it is my affirmative duty to prevent others from using said records for commercial purposes. 7. 1 do further swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will protect and hold harmless, including the costs of defending, the agency and its agents and employees from which I have obtained said records from any and all claims arising either directly or indirectly from the commercial use of said records. Page 3 Signature Date Received: of ED,� 890 City of Edmond43 0� Development Services Departm%o 121 5`h Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020��i�` Phone:425.771.0220 Fax: 425F/910221 For City Use Only. - File No: 1. 2. REQUEST FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION If you have distinctive handwriting you may choose to type this form_ Alleged Violator's Name/Phone: Violation Address or Site Location: �lo(�/ 747)( -- DETAILS'OF REQUEST: (Please be specific.) • r� November 14, 2005 Mr. Stephen Bullock City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 — So' Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 c Nov 1 4-005 OEVELORAEW SrgV1^ES RE: FILE ##SM-05-94 — APPLICATION TO REPLACE OR REPAIR MEADOWDALE MARINA Dear Mr. Bullock: eeply concerned about the current and proposed activities surrounding repair/"acement of the Meadowdale Marina. During the period of November 11 through November 13, 2005, the applicant was •observed removing decking and other material from the marina and throwing debris into Puget Sound. Evidence of this disposal can be observed littering the beaches north of the site in the Meadowdale Beach County Park at the mouth of Lund's Gulch, including freshly cut planks and other debris containing hazardous cabling and other hardware. There seems to be a complete lack of concern on the part of the applicant for the local environment. The beaches are being fouled by debris which is contaminated by toxic chemicals such as creosote. The cabling, bolts, and other hardware present a health and safety hazard to the many adults, children, and pets that use that beach daily. The debris, as it floats in the water, is hazardous to water craft and birds, to say nothing of the salmon which are, at the present time, attempting to return to spawn in Lund's Creek. It isiunderstanding that no permit has been issued for this demolition work. In any caseldoubt that disposing of the removed debris by throwing it in Puget Sound has been authorized In fact, the applicant has stated (in his above referenced application) that he will remove all debris and dispose of it inland. In all cases and at least, a containment boom should be required prior to any demolition and/or construction to assure that debris does not escape the immediate area. This is not a small project. It is anticipated to extend over 2 years and includes the use of a tugboat, a work boat, two barges, and a pile driver. The applicant states "There will be minor short-term noise from pile driving and other repair/replacement operations." This seems • disingenuous at best, considering the length and scope of the project. According to the Mr. Stephen Bullock November 14, 2005 • Page 2 application, the project includes replacement of 277 creosote -treated timber piles and caps. This repair/replacement" will entail considerable noise and time, ®suspect. It is important to note that do not object to the repair, replacement, or demolition of the Meadowdale Marina.- concerrIcenter on protection of the environment (beaches, waterways, flora and fauna), impact on the neighborhood quality of life (parking, noise, periods of operation, etc.), and health and safety hazards now and during the project. Please place special consideration on the fact that the streets in the area are very narrow, with hazardous curves and hills, bear heavy pedestrian traffic, and have no sidewalks. There is no obviously available area for storage of construction materials or employee parking. Please assure that a storm water containment and treatment system be required during all phases of the project, that all activities be restricted to reasonable daylight hours, and that the project be closely monitored for conformance to codes and permit conditions. This close monitoring is especially critical in view of the current flagrant violation of common environmental considerations. • 9 • • i'n c 189v STRELT FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-=I Website'. www.d.edmonds.waus DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering January 31, 2003 Y Meadowdale Marina LLC Jim Johnson, Registered Agent 7411 196t' Street Southwest Lynnwood, Washington 98036 RE: Meadowdale Marina @ 16111 76t' Place West, Edmonds Dear Mr. Johnson: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to outline City requirements regarding the repair work to be performed on the Meadowdale Marina. As you are aware, City Fire Department crews responded to a fire sprinkler flow alarm on January 25th, 2003 and discovered a portion of the pier and heavy framed timber building on the pier, partially collapsed. City Fire and Building Officials met with the Marina General Manager Mr. Milosavljevic on January 28th, 2003 to view the damage and discuss the repair issues. Mr. Milosavljevic indicated that he had the authority to speak and make decisions on behalf of the LLC. If this is not true please inform my office immediately. Given this the following is required by the City: • Contact PUD and immediately repair the stressed electrical line that services the heavy timber building. • Take immediate action to protect the electrical service panels that are now exposed to the weather due to the partial building collapse. A State Electrical permit may be required to repair etc.; it is your responsibility to contact the State Labor & Industries Everett offices for permitting requirements. • Remove the abandoned fuel tank located on the westerly portion of the pier. A tank removal permit ($45) is required. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. The City Fire Inspector must be on site to observe the cleaning and removal of the tank while in process. Remove the septic tank located on the east side of the pier and cap plumbing lines to and from the tank. A compliance permit ($50) is required for this work. Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Obtain a repair permit to make all necessary repairs. to the fire sprinkler system, (fee based on contractor's repair bid for the work). Obtain permit at Edmonds City Hall within 30 days date of this letter. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • .iictvr C itti - (-jolrinan _ian=n • Mr. Johnson January 31, 2003 Page Two • Secure the pier from access via land and water within 30 days date of this letter. Removal of ladders that allow water access to the pier and installation of "No Trespassing" signs are required. If in the future you decide to repair the damaged columns, piers, decking, or building, etc. you shall be required to obtain a building permit for this work. It is also highly likely that some Planning permits such as Shoreline permit, critical areas review, etc. would also be required. We suggest that you schedule for a pre -application meeting with City officials for any future repairs, remodeling. or re -building for this site. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. at 425-771-0220 during normal City business hours. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance for a mutually agreeable day and time as I am frequently assisting other citizens and not always available. • Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Mr. Milosavljevic, 23423 Brier Road, Brier, WA 98036 4'DATE RECEIVED C - PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS SE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER Q CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS IhIlI _7� 46 ed& Atl WNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS D�) el 9 '0I = 44e . PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO, LOT NO, LID NO. LID FEE S 5 1 O MAILING ADDRESS 0 `" --s PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP RW Street EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Sidewalk REQUIRED DEDICATION FT underground WI1lnp Approved p Permit Required GQ Use Permit Req'd Required Q Required Q required Q CITY ZIP CAP- '-✓ TELEPHONE ,r� �u C NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES Tto PRV REQUIRED YES ❑ NO ❑ z w z z ADDRESS REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR -EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME )p� CBLN �i ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE ADDRESSJ� �o FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE W U " CITY ZIP TELEPHONE STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADBII INSPECTION REO'D ❑YES ONO BOND POSTED $ O z SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOSED PROP TY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL N0. NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ❑ ADDITION j1 I/ COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr..) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT UR SIDE REAR REQ'D PARKING DIED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE ❑ REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑ SIGN ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ FENCE X FT) REMARKS �( ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK 0 z O t¢i CNUMBER m ❑ CARPORT GARAGE ❑ ROCKENING RY WALL ❑ FIRE ALARM RE SPRINKLER (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVn EXPLAIN: ' CHECKED BY PE OF CO STRUCTI N CO GROUP OCCUPANT . OF STORIES NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS /I/ CRITICAL AREAS 9�4 NUMBER SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED YES REA OCCUPANT LOAD DESCRIBE WORK to BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1081FINAL INSPECTION REO'D 9 S m `5— A lc - --- -- ---- VIIIA01 CTc n, D G 4- 0410VALUATION $ Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT. SLOPE % Building Permit f City Surcharge �. PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t_ BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC 3 DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading t SEPARATE PERMISSION. 3 Engr, Review u�l PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS IL PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR • PROVIDED. WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ' ` Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE .., 9 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT. OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due = NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S.ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.° / Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN I8 CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC• +e�� At This appllc�at�gn is r)ot a permlbuptil signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE RK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL f7 Building Oflicl 1p ih s/""DiBfiiu)y ,antifees are paid, and IOLATION OF THE OR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR FNS0'� 11014 receipt I2rAt.Wledgedinepacg.provided. MEN' 01 S N INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OF LS SIGNA E DAT 8 N WNER AGENT) DATE SIGNED (425) . J J />. e a 1 -0220 RELEASED Bf 6ATf A E Oh EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL -FILE YELLOW • INSPECTOR CATE:OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK -OWNER GOLD -ASSESSOR oa/o2 PR�FSS HAR11 .vni i ARF MaKINr; � 1^r1DIFC GREEN• ACCOUNTING • Y ATERECEIVED o--�-"' •�" D " ;:_, '` PERMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS ISE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER C%� 0;:2' CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS ' NER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS tl�W /� "bQ / R,,* '�.� s. 4 `�• v I �� PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO, LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ O MAILING ADDRESS ( A.."s i ' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED DEDICATION FT TESCP Approved Rw Permit Required Street Use Permit Rsq'd Inspection Required Sidewalk Required Wiringrequired p CITY ZIP •��11Yii TELEPHONE /� �j/ "K \ �.��5 "`^� p w1.� NAME • toYES METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED ❑ NO ❑ 3 E ADDRESS q2- REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE Z z FIRI MARSHAL CITY 4ZIP TELEPHONE MUST BE PRFSFNI EOR NAME 0 CBL # TANK FILL, REMOVAL OR CAP ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE ADDRESS' 2 3 23 0z cc FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE Lu CI � 21P VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION REO'D ❑YES ONO BOND POSTED g STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE CHECKED BY SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT EXP SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED' PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX AC 0 CEL NO. ''�f 7 � D / �� NEW ❑ RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING / MECH ❑ COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT VR SIDE REAR O Z ARK REO'D PROVIDED LOT AREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REMODEL MULTIFAMILY SIGN ❑❑ ❑ ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING CYDS 13 FENCE X FT) DEMOLISH OTHER XTANK REMARKS O GARAGE RETAININGF RE CARPORT ❑ ROCKERY WALL ❑ FIRE ALARM SPRINKLER (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: BY TYPTE C NSTCTION CO E OCCUPANT GROUP ay1ACHECKED 122& NUMBERNUMBER STORIES OF DWELLING /J � UNITS �v CRITICALOF AREAS /� NUMBER /(/ SPECIALINSPECTIOREA REQUIRED a YES OCCUPANT LOAD DESCRIBE WOR TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D _ 9 //�•+ j� (i7L ` VALUATION + a ;+ t L Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge HEAT SOURCE—T GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % Building Permit City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE Plumbing Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO t_ � 1 BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: 1B0 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT. 1 YEAR - PROVIDED -WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Grading Engr, Review Engr. Inspection "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS. WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY Fire Inspection Receipt # S = FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S. ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." " Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IGIVEN IS CORRECT AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE U Y AHAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; UTHOR Z DT THE FAGENT OF ORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. 1 AGREE T COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC• TION;. AND IN ,DOING WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED O ION OF T LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING To 's 3ATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SI R (0 R ' RAGE" DATE SIGNED CALL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and FOR INSPECTION receipt Is acknowledged In space provided, OF I $. SIGN T E DATE (425) 7i1-O220' RELEASED BY *DA A N ON DIU 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 .. ORIGINAL • FILE YELLOW • INSPECTOR PIN.K • OWNER GOLD • ASSESSOR 04/02 cmx:Q Q w,&12n -vr)i i &mI= Rmk,ipin r, (%noiI=C GREEN• ACCOUNTING Page 1 of 1 Graf, Jeannine • From: Graf, Jeannine Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:42 PM To: 'mpowlas@frontieradjusters.com' Subject: RE: Rainier Insurance CL # 05-4670466 Meadowdale Marina LLC Dear Mr. Powlas, The City is in receipt of your public disclosure request and will respond within five business days. Sincerely, Jeannine Graf -----Original Message ----- From: Mitch Powlas [mailto:mpowlas@frontieradjusters.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:40 AM To: Graf, Jeannine Cc: MBERTRAM@redshield.com Subject: Rainier Insurance CL # 05-4670466 Meadowdale Marina LLC Ms. Graf: Here is the Public Disclosure Request that was just faxed to your office. Mitch Powlas, OWNER FRONTIER ADJUSTERS • OF SEATTLE / LYNNWOOD, BELLINGHAM & EVERETT, WA 13300 Bothell -Everett Hwy, PMB 622 Mill Creek, WA 98012-5314 TELEPHONE: 425 / 337-7262 FAX: 425 / 316-9194 REPLY TO: MPOWLASna,frontieradjusters.com ************************************************************* Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. No recipient may use the information in this e-mail in violation of any civil or criminal statute. Frontier Adjusters of Seattle/Lynnwood, Bellingham & Everett, WA disclaims all liability for any unauthorized uses of this e-mail or its contents. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Warning: Computer viruses can be transmitted via e-mail. Frontier Adjusters of Seattle/Lynnwood, Bellingham & Everett, WA accepts no liability or responsibility for any damage caused by any virus transmitted with this e-mail. Thank you. 12/15/2005 1r-o6Z� gym . L12alim) :-t RECEIVE® Reque EDMONDS CITY CLERK PL rds Y Requester's Name: 10M - 5 R E C7, E I v E D Requester's Address: _(y c91;- ,� U C S 0 g Y h JUL 2 0 DEVELOPMENT vf:Fi'J10i' a i 1, i. Requester's Phone No.: H 1.�;-) ? r : / !I f9 U Area Code Request Made: ❑ In Person Er"In Writing Today's date: _%� �-ti - 0 C� NATURE OF REQUEST Please be specific and include all information pertinent to your request, i.e. address of property, file name or number (if applicable), owner of property, etc. Thank you! A I 1 Dwyier 0 /%yl5 > r - cChpc �►�, Ullow' i fi1/AS L4.4 {r hall' t X Is information requested to be used or commer ial purposes ❑Yes 2-No (Please complete attached Declaration to Reba a Pubj c gQkfs.)_ „ Signature of Person Making Request ACTION ON REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS (See R.C.W. 42.17.320) RECEIVE 1. Action taken: Request Granted Acknowledgement (Estimated response date provided.) (See No. 4) ❑ Record Denied (See Nos. 5 & 6) . • ❑ Record Withheld in Part (See Nos. 5 & 6)' JUL 2 G 21-6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - Continued on reverse side. Request for Public Records Cont. 2 Request forwarded to attomey for review: ❑ Yes Date Forwarded: ❑ No 3. Notification to Requester of Action Taken: Notification Date: Request granted. [] Need for additional time. How long? (See No. 4) ❑ Request denied. (see Nos. 5 and 6) ❑ Record withheld in part. (See Nos. 5 and 6) 4. If additional time needed, explain why: 5. If request denied or record withheld in part, name the exemption contained in Chapter . 42.17 RCW which authorizes withholding or denial: 6. If request denied or record withheld in part, explain how the exemption applies to this record: Request received by: Department: Dated: FEES: 0 — 5 copies: -------------------------------- -------free Standard copy charge: pages B $.15 $ Other (Refer to current.records index & fee schedule): ------ ------44--5 TOTAL FEES: $h,� RECEIPT NO: DATE:_%/2_LhD DOCUMENTS PROVIDED: • Date: 2A � MAILED (, PICKED UP K T N • DECLARATION TO RELEASE PUBLIC RECORDS ,e5 L (AY_S 5�v1 (PRINT NAME) Having been duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I have requested copies of the following public records: 2. 1 understand that Washington State law, RCW 42.17.260(9), prohibits the use of lists of individuals for commercial purposes. 3. 1 understand that the use for commercial purposes of said records may also violate the rights of the individuals named therein and may subject me to liability for such commercial use. 4. 1 understand that section 2 and 3 herein apply when I _ use said records for commercial purposes and when others use said records or copies for same for commercial purposes. I understand that I may be liable in either case. 5. 1 understand that "commercial purposes" means that the person requesting the record intends that the list will be used to communicate with the individuals named in the record for the purpose of facilitating profit expecting activity. 6. Therefore, I do hereby swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will not use said records for commercial purposes and that further, it is my affirmative duty to prevent others from using said records for commercial purposes. 7. 1 do further swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will protect and hold harmless, including the costs of defending, the agency and its agents and employees from which I have obtained said records from any and all claims arising either directly or indirectly from the commercial use of said records gnature Ll Request for�Pub1 .Records Requester's Name: Requester's Addre: Requester's Phone No.: (2� Area .Co& Request Made:, In Person PLEASPEtj0jXTEARLY ❑ In Writing _ Today's tJ tj-J2- 200.9 NATURE OF REQUEST Please be specific and include all information pertinent to your request, i.e. address of property, file name or number (if applicable), owner of property, etc. Thank you! All balk a eer, aw- 7�. 01 ! � Q'/ 1 l � � 0�1at e f N�s-db.,rdrl c fi�ilc (o� n� ✓ & P Z 11,4124 Is information requested to be used for om r I purposes es �o (Please complete attached Declaration to Rele ublic, a.) I V/Signkureof Person Making Request ACTION ON REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS (See R.C.W. 42.17.320) 1. Ac ' n taken: Request Granted Acknowledgement (Estimated response date provided.) (See No. 4) ❑ Record Denied (See Nos. 5 & s) • ❑ Record Withheld in Part (See Nos. 5 & s) Continued on reverse side. Request for Public Records Cont. 2 6 2. Request forwarded to attorney for review: ❑ Yes Date Forwarded: No • 3. Notification to Requester of Action Taken: Notification Date: ❑ Request granted. ❑ Need for additional time. How long? (See No. 4) ❑ Request denied. (See Nos. 5 and 6) ❑ Record withheld in part. (See Nos. 5 and 6) 4. If additional time needed, explain why: 5. If request denied or record withheld in part, name the exemption contained in Chapter 42.17 RCW which authorizes withholding or denial: 6. If request denied or record withheld in part, explain how the exemption applies to this record: 7. Request received by: Department: Dated: • FEES: 0 — 5 copies: ------------------------- ------- -------free Standard copy charge: pages IM/. 5 Other (Refer to current records Index & fee schedule): - =` . V' .�7_I'� �I -7 , TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT NO: DATE:A[I�_ DOCUMENTS PROVIDED: Date: ♦44*4 ❑ MAILED PICKED UP n �J • DECLARATION TO RELEASE PUBLIC RECORDS Nt i G 3 S4V1 f_0V'2 (PRINT NAME) Having been duly sworn, deposes and says: _ 1.. I have requested copies of the following public records: 2. 1 understand that Washington State law, RCW 42.17.260(9), prohibits the use of lists of individuals for commercial purposes. 3. 1 understand that the use for commercial purposes of said records may also violate the rights of the individuals named therein and may subject me to liability for such commercial use. 4. 1 understand that section 2 and 3 herein apply when .1 use said records for commercial purposes and when others use said records or copies for same for • commercial purposes. I understand that I may be liable in either case. 5. 1 understand that "commercial purposes". means that the requesting the record intends that the list will be used to communicate wthrson the individuals named in the record for the purpose of facilitating profit expecting activity. 6. Therefore, I do hereby swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will not use said records for commercial purposes and that further, it is my affirmative duty to prevent others from using said records for commercial purposes. 7. I do further swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will protect and hold harmless, including the costs of defending, the agency and its agents and employees from which I have obtained said records from any and all claims arising either directly or indirectly from the commercial use of s id recor . ignature is • • 0 Microsoft Access . �rgih ; ; . xx�• l! iiec.cA , , ws+�s� 3 El PI WV :011 H :R Form Vlew F—F—I NUM • 1� u 0 -4, Microsoft Access Ell glas]O._ - O J er,�,,�.c-...y.,�.-.....a, .._.,.. _... , Ede»�dt` ylew [n_. _... _ s�ert .Fg7mat Records Iools W.Indow Help ` Z. I ."� � ' <,' (; � I .►.k. YIC [1I� ��u.RlIXCIl I �yLil�$_ IMP :-0r 1. rf I: �#y A?, I z AMP I �1 �] I � :i.►. • °� 11' I DII''P� FQ F.,,wites. �:I ,So . I ( 4.-.•-...-• _ • • • • • Show 161 tt1 Permit• 76thn;:;�a Bld p: Street Name:a• T e: Dir. Tax Accl #: Permit ><_ Type: Occ: Bldg Nam " 16111 76th PL W 19760541 52 Meadowdale Marina & .:. 16111 76th _. _ _ PL W _._ _ 19760609 _ 52 Meadowdale Marina B 16111 76th PL W 19760680 66 Meadowdale Manna 8 16111 76th PL W 19760715 47 Meadowdale Marina B 16111 76th PL W 19770430 63 1 Meadowdale Manna B 16111 76th PL W 19870325 63 Meadowdale Marina B 16111 76th PL W 19700153 5 16111 76th PL W 1 401 231 Haines Wharf 16111 76th f W I ►' 16111 76th PL I W 1 19750424 __26 197504701 21 _ I Laebugten Whart 1 Laebu ten Wharf War Record: 10 �>O Ill 1►41 of 10 • ► fin. _. Form VleW I —'I— 1=:Num 'I±__ DA Zone A S.W. 1/4, SEC. 5 T.27 N., R.4 E.W.M. 507 15<33 COUNTY PA RK 07 GATE 15516 155s 1�1 Ln M o Is516 15515 I` n ISS20 Issis 'SsoB n -r O p 15605 ^ IS602 0 8 N 15b01 !— ISbo4 15614 H 0 1` Isb2� �0 f S6 20 15615 _ 15h10 P \� O 15631 �-or 15700 15625 rimiff � 57oa 1570(o ISG10 l I5702 115705 ���� o� 0 N o �+ 57 1 s7ol 5� 19 IS7/z r r r 15709 IS707 0) do o I S 714 15721 r572 W 1 1 � 1,5722 i I?729 157t8 . �, •723 ISM/q O 157 0 15726 15730 15772 0o� 15719 2 158 TM 15120 O 15810 1008 15900 1sB0v 15808 IS727 �i 16821 15'81♦ r 158/4 IS I SB0 ISHIZ 4 15805 72"O 15BIo 15824 •1S>< • W ?j 2, 15827 15826 15828 ISBt9 � 15824 . 15825 .'� b J o. , v IS911 15907 5902 /591M .IS9ol 3' a a 15908 f592b 15910 r- 15906 157� �q 15410 159E7 iy 159o2 15915 A 5908 IS91L a > 15917 0 9 W 16000 PAP n �tj 15920 I5931 15926 $ 17 ?0 I r NOA FT ST Ifo123 2 16Wo 007C 16012 3 wo, / i��160y 16010 �° a .°Dc t co24 G� R 16119 11 —0 2 16007 76 Oq Iloll ►6020 0 a ^'v 1.° 16008 1603/ 10 or1 a S 1 `� r 16105 1 ° 16036 (ii 0 /bolo /G��3 • 11612o obo lel0y 19 21 d o0 161 L roslloeWoll� 16108 /6/N �nRRINA 16103 /L/6 16112 /tiros 0- N 00 Rol cr a, 6109 1 o* 106 % 3till Z' 1%1 Iroloo I(p1 bl 9 1612 � f613! F 1:121 IIO2t5 16116 3 6209 /6211 6216 0 6217 16202 ! 4AA 16221 16209 1670 f6215 �30 N )622o Qv F 16219 L M — ► 16238 f6236 6220 4/622e /6723 I 16310 N FL. 1by22 /6232 p.16225 � 0 / \6� 16320 16311 6,3 639 00 16317 16330 16315 6318 f6315 632o �' b c 16340 16319 r9i N N 6312 N c /6319 Z N��6 ° I` ^ �16323 16322 ^ 1632) tv P�• $,W, j • 16404 164 m 'i g 1.(0424 16411 16410 ° 1°n a �° ^ o o r i 161zo r y 1 PL.16419 16419 p �y `d m w O go 16431 ^ M O p, ^ n l6930 164 E5 `� o o .o 0 n r M[A o.v QLv 16 6`5 Requ Requester's Name: TA toe, C a l4 el,-(n Requester's Address: % 0 4- S; f t7 A K C ' o 14f h rds JAN 17 2001 ®5-VELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Requester's Phone. No.: (y7- 1 77 1 `/UCH U Am Co& Request Made: [ZYIn Person ❑ In Writing Today's date:_O NATURE OF REQUEST Please be specific and include all information pertinent to your request, i.e. address of property, file name or number (if applicable), owner of property, etc. Thank youl Is information requested to be used f0 commer/',I ` purposes? ElYes allo (Please complete attached Declaration to ltelea Public, I;ec Signature of Person Making Request ACTION ON REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS (See R.C.W. 42.17.320) 1. Actiop A a ren: &IRequest Granted ❑ Acknowledgement (Estimated response date provided.) (See No. 4) ❑ Record Denied (See Nos. 5 & 6) • ❑ Record Withheld in Part (See Nos. 5 s s) Continued on reverse side. 0 Request for Public Records Cont. " 2 2. Request forwarded to attorney for review: ❑ Yes Date Forwarded: ❑ No • 3. Notification to Requester of Action Taken:. Notification Date: ❑ Request granted. ❑ Need for additional time. How long? (see No. 4) ❑ Request denied. (see Nos. 5 and 6) ❑ Record withheld in part. (see Nos. 5 and 6) 4. If additional time needed, explain why: 5. If request denied or record withheld in part, name the exemption contained in Chapter 42.17 RCW which authorizes withholding or denial: 6. If request denied or record withheld in part, explain how the exemption applies to .this record: 7. Request received by: Department: Dated: FEES: 0 — 5 copies: ---- NN___ ___NN N___N _N__N _______free Standard copy charge: pages @ $.15 $ Other (Refer to current records Index & fee schedule): ------ -_-•-_ _-•..........$ TOTAL FEES: $ RECEIPT NO: DATE: DOCUMENTS PROVIDED: Date: ❑ MAILED ❑ PICKED UP 4'-. • DECLARATION TO RELEASE PUBLIC RECORDS (PRINT NAME) Having been duly sworn, deposes and says: _ 1.. I have requested copies of the following public records: 2. 1 understand that Washington State law, RCW 42.17.260(9), prohibits the use of lists of individuals for commercial purposes. 3: 1 understand that the use for commercial purposes of said records may also violate the rights of the individuals named therein and may subject me to liability for such commercial use. 4. 1 understand that section 2 and 3 herein apply when .I use said records for commercial purposes and when others use said records or copies for same for . commercial purposes. I understand that I may be liable in either case. 5. 1 understand that "commercial requesting the record intends that the list will beoused oeans commun c tethatewthrson the individuals named in the record for the purpose of facilitating profit expecting activity. 6. Therefore, I do hereby swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will not use said records for commercial purposes and that further, it is my affirmative duty to prevent others from using said records for commercial purposes. 7. 1 do further swear and affirm on oath and under penalty of law that I will protect and hold harmless, including the costs of defending, the agency and its agents and employees from which I have obtained said records from any and all claims arising either directly or indirectly from the commercial use of said records. Signature 0 MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 23432 BRIER RD BRIER, WA 98036 206.353.6456 CONTACT: MILO MILOSAVLJEVIC APPLICANT MEADOWDALE MARINA LLC 23432 BRIER RD BRIER, WA 98036 206.353.6456 CONTACT: MILO MILOSAVLJEVIC NE 1/4, SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTHJANGE 4 EAST, W.M. „.., 0-1 I PL/MX E W ' `A6 'A -A Owr, I l U U A 90 Z' 6 ut�t D M UA"� N D S W Al Ao"" "' 0 t'446 ST CONSULTANTS SURVEYOR VAN CLEAVE AND ASSOCIATES 1 TH ST 1641H ST SW 112 CANDLE WICK DRIVE W. LAKEWOOD, WA 98499 253.588.3821 t64TH sw PUGU Sw w SITE N CIVIL ENGINEER CG ENGINEERING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WA 98020 425.778.8500 FAX 778.5536 CONTACT. MIKE SPANO PE CITY OF EDMONDS GENERAL NOTES ST S 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF 27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR EDMONDS STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER SERVICE. INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS: COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH THE WRITTEN -2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES AND WITH 2 WEEKS ADVANCE -2008 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL NOTICE, CONSTRUCTION 28. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK -WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 2. STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO WSDOT 29. NEW UT11JT`( LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION. ARE INDICATED, LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL 3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. IS IN PROGRESS. 30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE 4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 31. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF WITHIN THE BUILDING. "AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF 32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK. REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION 33. SEE LAIIDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCY. 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. STORM DrtAINAGE NOTES: 7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN + FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND PIPES ' SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. 1. ALL STOl,'f: ; SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM WITH CHAPTER 9 OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY _THEREFORE IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (E.D.D.S.) AND DIVISION 7 OF THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND. TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT WSDOT/APWA SPECIFICATIONS. ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE 2. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE COUPLINGS, FITTINGS, ADAPTERS & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE INSTALLED PIPE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PER AND CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNEC11ON OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. TRENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. CG ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES ON THESE DRAWINGS.. 1. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE TYPE 1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL 2.- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOLE, INLET, AND CATCH CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS AND PAVING. HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL GRATES SHALL BE DEPRESSED 0.1 FEET BELOW PAVEMENT LEVEL. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE 4. CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL BE PER SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD PLANS BEFORE STARTING WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY 9-140 & 9-160. DISCREPANCIES. 10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. 12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 13. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES. 15. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 17. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE ROUTED DIRECTLY TO PUGET SOUND. STORM WATER FROM DECKING SHALL BE ROUTED TO CATCH BASIN STORMFILTERS FOR TREATMENT. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. 19. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR PRECONSTRUCIION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. 20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR THE PREVEN11ON OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. 22. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN. 24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REQUIRED. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LOCAL FIRE MARSHAL TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ALL WATER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS, HYDRANT SHUTOFFS, STREET CLOSURES OR OTHER ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCATE OR ELIMINATE ANY 7 HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL. 0 NOTE: ALL UTILITY WORK IS UNDER ` PERMIT BLD2008094 - FAI THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY A LEGEND DESCRIPTION EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE - - - - ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE - - - - CENTERLINE - - CLEARING LIMITS - SEDIMENT BARRIER X X CONTOUR LINE 100 100 FENCE SANITARY SEWER LINE - - - SS - - - SS - ----ss-�l _ss_ MANHOLE STORM DRAIN MAIN - - -SD- - -SD- 0 SD io--SD- STORM DRAIN PIPE ROOF DRAIN --- R--- R - - -R- R R FOOTING DRANI --- F--- F - - -F- F F PRESSURELIlE --- P--- P - - -P- P P CATCH BASIN. (TYPE 1) ❑ CATCH -81,kSN (TYPE 2) O O CLEANOUT,- 0 o CLEANOUT AND WYE GRADE BREAK SURFACE SWALE > -- • >---- >- . . DRAINAGE ARROW WATER LINE, - - WA - - - WA -WA-WA- WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT FDC PIV o GATE VALVE TEE AA I 900 BEND THRUST BLOCKING o e CAP - CONCRETE PAVEMENT ® ° ASPHALT Ph�EMENT CRUSHED SURFACING r' ROCKERY SPOT ELEVATION f 2 f 20.0 TELEPHONE LINE ---T - - -T - AAN T T POWER LINE --- E - - -E- -E E E GASE LINE --- G - - -c-- G- SIGN Fl ❑_ APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE C %mmmw I 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 �gEVY C 4 23725 �+Q 1 ti ONAL � Y Q 1 DESIGN: DJP DRAWN: ZOS CHECK: GAG JOB NO: 07256.20 DATE: 05/01 /08 W 0 Q J (/0 CL W W � � � W N ck� U C) 00 W_ Q JLJ 0) a- Q W _J 0V� 0 r- Z �- 0 Woo LW :2•- 0 L,J 0 1 NE 1/4, SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. CBSF2, OUTLET TO BAY VIA DOWN TURNED ELBOW, REFER TO RIM. ELEV. = 17.50 A CATCH BASIN STORMALTER CBSF1, OUTLET TO BAY VIA A CATCH BASIN STORMFILTER CBSF2, OUTLET TO BAY VIA 2 DOWN TURNED ELBOW, REFER TO C2, RIM. ELEV. = 17.50 CONCRETE PANEL PIER W/ CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB SLOPED TO CATCH BASIN STORM FILTERS PER STRUCTURAL PLANS 1 1 \ g 1 1, 1 A EX APPROACH TRESTLIIt TO BE 1 REPLACED WITH CONCRETE & � STEEL CONSTRUCTION I APPR6X. OHWM-MHHW=10.91 — \ \ \'VC 4 1 I A \ MLLW=0.00'\\ \\ C2. 1 I TAAT LT API \ CONCRETE APPROACH TRESTLE \ \ 1 W/ CONCRETE TOPPING SLAB NC API \ \ EDGE ELEV. = 17.75 \ STEEL GRATING PER \ STRUCTURAL PLANSti I SLABAL P` a °I I a l la I I I•I I\ I I° I I I I I I° I 1 Lai L pd I° a° I I I I 1_ ° ° I I I I I I a ..I I I 1 1. ° °.. I �. °I I a I \ J 1 1/2" DOMESTIC & 4ca " D.I. FIRE LINE II �� o J I I \ ENCASED It� INSULATED 18 GALV. CMP. ATTACH TO �IER PER STRUCTURAL PLANS I �! "�') CATC BASIN STORMALTER To I `�';>> z . I OUT TO BAY VIA DOr TURNED 1 I a ELBOW, PREFER TO CONNECT TO EX. DOM1J TIC RIM ELEV\ = 17.50 Cl FIRE, WATER, AND IDE 1 Q 1 SEWER LINE IN 36" S EL Q DOWN TURNED ELBOW, REFER TO Cz, a l � \ ENCASEM NT RIM EL. = 17.50 OUTS OF DO S UTS I I I I I FORCE SIDEWER 2" HIGH-MOL (200, PSI) PEP EN OSEO IN 8" SCH. 40 PV6 TO 1 0 1 I D RECTL 0 SOUND 1 °° 1 ° ATTACH PIER PER STRUCTURAL I a\ � I 33 \ N 1 I 0• I ISTI N I ° 1 I I BUILDIN i BE-RE�AI I I I ° SUl?PORT LINES \ FFI�- } EX. TIDELANDS II I x GH PER\STRUCTURAL \ � �PE I I UETUR I I I I I / I I I- \ O \ `V ° PLAN R 0 C2. I °. i ° ° 3 \ TO REMAIN 1 I Q I CATCH BASIN STORM FILTER CBSF1, 1 II f \ Ia 4 I I I I I OUTLET TQ BAY VIA DOWN M TURNED E OW, REFER TO C2 RIM EL. = I `o 4 " DI FIRE LAI _ \ RIP RAP BULKHEAD 1 o i t r r /Tl/TTl \ \ \ c' R TE DS BETWEEN \ IN ALL PA AG U T G IND R P MP U H CONNECT\ \ \ 1 8'-10' HIGH I \ PIER i (3) �I ACES Q PIER, HYDROMATIC TL-PRO SYSTEM W/ � PGR200 \ \ 1 ^ • Q I " DOMESTIC 'WATER 2 HIGH-MOL (200 PSI) FITTINGS, INSTALLED ON CONNECT FIRELINE TO "� ^ N \ TO EXISTINMNE \ \ \ SEP�AR\ATE CIRCUIT BREAKER W/ INDOOR/ OUT�DDOOR \ EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM \ M n I ALARM. 0 NOT SUBJECT TO LIVE LOADS. CONI+�ECT \ \ \ 1 M _ I I \ \ EXISTING SEWER LINE TO PUMP. CONNEC110N TO CD\ PIER PER MANUFACTURER REQUIREMENT \ \ \ EXISTING STEEL FRAME \ \\ \ \\ 1 I \ BUILDING, CONCRETE PIER, \ 1 \ AND STEEL &5 TO REMAIN \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ EXIST SLAB \ \ a I ELE \ \ \ 22138 \� �S7. 5 O ELI 1 17.75 .1 SIN �I ICI �� � � � � � • ' i0 1�1►. ' � Imo. ILIIN f�dl IPA • � .I®/I fi- � �� i EL: _' .75 An \°I ®E 4" 4 ENGINIE6RING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 VY C� 0 SPA I L ETA I o DITCH fEX. FL I W LINE Y I � I p I I EX. RAILROAD = Y TRACKS I I I 00 EX. SSMH #39 v RIGHT OF IE. = 26.52 W Y w Q � I 1 I N o I ono _m— 5 i NEW ASP ALT SRO TOUJI n c(n � BE REPLACE r8Y BNSF y v � - CONC. 4P N TO BE ®�, i w w > R PP A _CE BY BNSF `, I o o- v CL �- RAILIROAD � �; � CROSSING SIGN EX. CB #1-92 � � N M �� 1 i ANE- o o tR R APPROAC I I o `- W/ 1" & 6"0 DDCV — SEWER 1 1 SSMH #1 = 24.30 RIP RAP -J — — WA —1 — WA co EX. 3"p CONP. _ S S I 0 0 S`r I N o �II � � o IQ� EX. WATER MANHOLE W/ PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE �- EX. FIRE HYDRANT #1-17 �- EX. BOLLARDS EX. PUMP STATION BUILDING W/ GENERATOR EX. GAS TANK EX. SSMH 00 EX. WET WELL/ DRY i T WELL PUMP STATION cD a.l EX. FENCE I � I � 3 I EX. WATER VALVES �3 I I I T EX. 6" D.I. FORCE MAIN I �I g Q I I � 'T = �I LC) I I E. MH#2 I IE. :q 33.20 SPECIAL SURVEY NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS BASED UPON A BOUNDARY SURVEY BY VAN CLEAVE &ASSOCIATES, SIGNED 05/08/01. ALL UTILITIES AND FEATURES UPLAND FROM THE SHORELINE ROCKERY WERE ASBUILT BY ENGINEER AND NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE. RIGHT-OF-WAYS ARE SHOWN PER SURVEYORS MAP. `J SCALE: 1. - 30. THESE. PLANS NAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY A APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE Y DESIGN: DJP DRAWN: ZOS CHECK: GAG JOB NO: 07256.20 DATE: 05/01 /08 Z W W :m Q W U Z I V) CL W W 0 N O W Q 00 0 C Q Q LLJ _! _ to ^ W �- 0�-Z 0 .- O .J W p p U- �- W SHEET: .. ........... i 11lA CW MOWDSE r NE 1/4, SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. C s� B) 2\2 OUTLET STUB (SEE NOTES 4*5) 10.. G. OVERLAP p ° WEIR WALL c, ° >p p e A 1 4" SCUM BAFFLE 5 e a ) n ° >c G" REINFORCING BARS INLET STUB (SEE NOTE G) (OPTIONAL) (SEE NOTES 445) 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - PLAN VIEW 1 1 4 O INLET GRATE OPENING ACCESS COVER CONCRETE COLLAR OUTLET STUBi?!� (SEE NOTE G) (SEE NOTES 4*5) 5TORMFILTER CLEANOUT ACCESS CARTRIDGE (fYP) PLUG ON WEIR WALL (SEE NOTE 2) UNDERDRAIN MANIFOLD 51D 1�—DE INSIDE INSIDE OUTSIDE THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW A U.S. PATENT Z. 5,3 2,G29, 1 No. 5,707.527, No. 6,027,639 No. 6,G49,048, No. 5.624,576, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING . &jkjVjE^U1DDEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING v*,p,405°%— ® �•�� r STORMWATER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS � STANDARD DETAIL - 1 CARTRIDGE UNIT SOLUTIONS, 1/3 contechstormwater.com DATE:11/01/05 SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME: CBSFI-SD-DTL DRAWN1 MJW CHECKED: ARG CONTECH M-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN DETAILS SCALE: NTS 1` M "^' "— _REINFORCING BARS INLET STUB (SEE NOTE G) (OPTIONAL)-j (5EE NOTES 445) 2-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - PLAN VIEW 11 4"0 OPENING 1 ITYN INLET GRATE OUTLET STUB ACCESS COVER J— (SEE NOTES 445) (TYP) 2 I/2" G„ CONCRETE COLLAR q (SEE NOTE G) 5TORMFILTER ° CARTRIDGE (TYP) (SEE NOTE 2) CLEANOUT ACCESS PLUG ON WEIR WALL UNDERDRAIN MANIFOLD 2' 2'-8" 2' �—INSIDE INSIDE INSIDE G'-9" OUTSIDE THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5tormFdterO - - 2-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW A .5. 07,52 . 5,322,7,G - No. 5,707,527, No. 6,027,639 1 No. 6,649,048, No. 5,624,576, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING I� DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING +e'. its``►°"~� ®�:"� STORMWATER PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS SOLUTIONS STANDARD DETAIL - 2 CARTRIDGE UNIT 113 contechstormwater.com DATE: H/01/05 I SCALE: NONE FILE NAME: CBSF2-SD-DTL DRAWN: MJW I CHECKFJI: ARG PERMANENT POOL 4"0 OPENING ELEVATION P-5 1/4" 2' VARIES 3'-3 5/8" 3'-3 5/8" MAX. 55— OUTLET STUB INLET STUB (SEE NOTES 445) Z (OPTIONAL) INSIDE (SEE NOTES 44 5) 2"0 OUTLET PIPE FROM UNDEKDRAIN I�-2'-O 1/2"� OUTSIDE 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW TB LIFTING EYE (TYP OF 4) PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION CARTRIDGE (TYP) SUPPORT 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormhlter® U.S. PATENT No. 5,322,629, No. 5.707,527. No. 6,027,639 No. 6,649,048, No. 5,624,576, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN (02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING SECTION VIEWS 2 STORMWATER STANDARD DETAIL - 1 CARTRIDGE UNIT SOLUTIONS a 2/3 contachstorrnwater.Com DATE:11/01/05 SCALE:NONE I FILE NAME: CBSFI-SD-DTL DRAWN: MJW CHECKED: ARG PERMANENT POOL 4"0 OPENING ELEVATION 1 '-5 1/4" 2' VARIES 3'-3 5/8" 3'-3 5/8" MAX. /K7 5" 5" INLET STUB OUTLET STUB 2' (OPTIONAL) (SEE NOTES 445) IN51DE (SEE NOTES 44 5) 2"0 OUTLET PIPE : 2'-0 112" FROM UNDERDOUT RAIN OUTSIDE 2-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW B 2 LIFTING EYE (fYP OF 4) 4-9 PERMANENT POOL ELEVATION '-G" CARTRIDGE (TYP) SUPPORT 2-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - SECTION VIEW C 2 THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 5tormfiltu0 U.S. PATENT No. 5,322,G29, No. 5,707,527, No. 6,027,639 No. 6,649,048, No. 5,624,576, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING _ DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING %pF�40;°q- ®® SECTION VIEWS 2 STORMWATER SOLUTIONSK STANDARD DETAIL - 2 CARTRIDGE UNIT 213 contechstormwaler.com DATE:11/01/05 I SCALE: NONE FILE NAME: CBSF2-SD-DTL DRAWN:MJW CHECKED:ARG GENERAL NOTES 1) 5TORMFILTEK BY CONTECH 5TORMWATER 50LUTON5; PORTLAND, OK (800) 548-4GG7; SCARBOROUGH, ME (877) 907-8G7G; LINTHICUM, MD (8GG) 740-3315. 2) FILTERS TO BE SIPHON -ACTUATED AND SELF -CLEAVING. 3) STEEL STRUCTURE TO BE MANUFACTURED OF 1 /41NCH STEEL PLATE. 4) 5TORMFILTER REQUIRES 3.3 FEET OF DROP FROLA RIM TO OUTLET. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTLET. INLET (IF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 5) CB5F EQUIPPED WITH 4 INCH (APPROXIMATE) LONG 5TUB5 FOR INLET (IF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING. STANDARD OUTLET STUB 15 8 INCHES IN DIAMETER. MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB 15 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING CAN BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPLING BY CONIRACTOR. G) FOR H-20 LOAD RATING, CONCRETE COLLAR IS R:QUIKED. CONCRETE COLLAR WITH QUANTITY (2) #4 REINFORCING BARS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 7) ALL 5TORMFILTERS REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMATION. INLET GRATE I -CARTRIDGE DEEP CATCHBASIN S-ORMNLTER DATA STRUCTURE ID I WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE (cfs) 0.02 PEAK FLOW RATE (< 1.8 cfs) 0.05 RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW (rs) 100 CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE ( 15 OR 7.5 m) 7.5 MEDIA TYPE (C5F, PERLITE, ZPG) CSF RIM ELEVATION 17.5± PIPE DATA: I.E. DIAMETER INLET STUB I NONE NONE OUTLET STUB NONE NONE CONFIGURATION OUTLET OUTLET INLET �INL-ET SLOPED LID NO SOLID COVER NO NOTE5/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: TO BE 5UPPOKTED BY PRECAST BEAM. PROVIDE 90" ELBOW AT OUTLET. ACCESS COVER e 4 4 � I a 2'_4" INSIDE RIM c 4 o < e a ` 4 na 2'_4" ~IN51DE RIM IN51DE RIM 4'-8 3/4" THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT OUTSIDE RIM 5totlter® U.S. PATENT No. 5,322,629, 1-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - TOP VIEW 1 No. 6,6409,048, No.5,624,576, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions `3 PATENTS PENDING DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING "' ► of ® movLO- STORMWATER TOP VIEW, NOTES AND DATA 3 SOLUTIONSK STANDARD DETAIL - 1 CARTRIDGE UNIT 3/3 contechstormwater.com DATE:11/01/05 SCALE:NONE IFILE NAME: CBSFI-SD-DTL DRAWN: MJW CHECKED:ARG GENERAL NOTES 1) 5TORMFILTER BY CONTECH 5TORMWATER 50LUTION5; PORTLAND, OR (500) 548-4GG7; SCARBOROUGH, ME (877) 907-8G7G; LINTHICUM, MD (8GG) 740-3318. 2) FILTERS TO BE SIPHON -ACTUATED AND SELF-CLEANING. 3) STEEL STRUCTURE TO BE MANUFACTURED OF 1/4 INCH STEEL PLATE. 4) STORMFILTEK REQUIRES 3.3 FEET OF DROP FROM RIM TO OUTLET. INLET SHOULD NOT BE LOWER THAN OUTLET. INLET (IF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING TO BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER AND PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 5) CB5F EQUIPPED WITH 4 INCH (APPROXIMATE) LONG STUBS FOR INLET (IF APPLICABLE) AND OUTLET PIPING. STANDARD OUTLET STUB I5 8 INCHES IN DIAMETER. MAXIMUM OUTLET STUB IS 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER. CONNECTION TO COLLECTION PIPING CAN BE MADE USING FLEXIBLE COUPLING BY CONTRACTOR. G) FOR H-20 LOAD RATING, CONCRETE COLLAR IS REQUIRED. CONCRETE COLLAR WITH QUANTITY (2) #4 REINFORCING BARS TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. 7) ALL 5TORMFILTER5 REQUIRE REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR MORE INFORMATION. 2-CARTRIDGE DEEP CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DATA 5TRUCTURE ID 2 WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE (cfs) 0.07 PEAK FLOW RATE (< 1.5 cfs) 0.1 G RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW (rs) 100 CARTRIDGE FL01V RATE (1 5 OR 7.5 m) 7.5 MEDIA TYPE (CS=, PERLITE, ZPG) CSF RIM ELEVATION 1 7,5± PIPE DATA: I.E. IDIAMfTER INLET STUB NONE NONE OUTLET STUB NONE NONE CONFIGURATION OUTLET 101 10 INLET 5LOPED LID NO SOLID COVER NO NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: TO BE SUPPORTED BY PRECAST BEAM. PROVIDE 50' ELBOW AT OUTLET. INLET GRATE ACCESS COVER (TYP) THE 5TORMWATER MANAGEMENT ' OUTSIDE RIM Stormh¢ rO U.S. PATENT No. 5,322.629. 2-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN - TOP VIEW 1 No. 6,6409,048, No. 5,624,57G, AND OTHER U.S. AND FOREIGN 02006 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions PATENTS PENDING ® greAm Lj ® DEEP STEEL CATCHBASIN STORMFILTER DRAWING %9 40*-Ffv ® &OV .W-a STORMWATER TOP VIEW, NOTES AND DATA 3 SOLUTIONSK STANDARD DETAIL - 2 CARTRIDGE UNIT 313 contechstormwater.com DATE:11101105 SCALE:NONE FILE NAME: CBSF2-SD-DTL DRAWN:MJW CHECKED:ARG 3 DRIVE AISLE P SCALE: 1 " = 1 -0" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE WEARING COURSE (WSDOT STD. SPEC 5-04.0) 5/8 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE (WSDOT STD. SPEC 9-03.9(3)) 1 1/4" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE (WSDOT STD. SPEC 9-019(3)) COMPACTED SUBGRADE ENT SECTION 21,4' PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAIL PER STRUCTURAL PLANS 4.0' GRATING PER STRUCTURAL PLANS GRATING PER STRUCTURAL PLANS 4 MIN. DEP1N CONCRETE CURB PER ,I 2.0% TOPPING SLAB STRUCTURAL PLANS 2.0� CONC. BEAMS AND • e PANELS PER • e •�e .`e a STRUCTURAL PLANS PILE CAP PER STRUCTURAL PLANS A 2'0 FORCE SIDE SEWER ENCASED INjl�— SCH 40 PVCATTACH TO CONCRETEPILES PER BEAM W/ 1/2"0 U-BOLTS 0 4' OC STRUCIUAL PLANS STRUCTURAL PLANS A 1 1 /2"0 DOMESTIC WATER AND 4"0 DI FIRE LINE ENCASED IN POLYESTER PLASTIC FOAM INSULATED 18"0 GALVANIZED CMP ATTACH TO STEEL BEAM W/ 1 /2'0 U-BLOTS 0 4' OC PER STRUCTURAL PLAN TYPICAL TRESTLE SECTION SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" LIGHT WELL DETAIL SCALE: 1 " = 1'- A CONTECH (2)-CARTRIDGE CATCHBASIN DETAILS � SCALE: xrs THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY A APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 1"Mr-I Art ♦ rr• Mr M DATE BERM POPPING SLAB HEIGHT VARIES vv11�nETE PANEL HER PER STRUCTURAL PLANS ENGINelEwRING 250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 PHONE (425) 778-8500 FAX (425) 778-5536 G A J L.tJ CL O m O (n in W �"- CE (n J W LLJ S 0 CLU Y DESIGN: DJP DRAWN: ZOS CHECK: GAG JOB NO: 07256.20 DATE: 05/01 /08 z W W N rJ CL W 3::(0 x LLJ N i� (.) 0 W W � 0) ^^� CL Q W J = MILD 0 z e_ �0j L W W 01LM11111 V) J W 0 rW V z RESUB t�AYa� Nm V �t 13wos S33IA83S _LN3Wd013A30 510Z 11 T 330 Pf a -C)t INA -4114 G3HJ,'S � R/CONTRA TOR IS _ EROSIONTJr 01 A %0­ 7 lOfcic�cil� �v�isin7 3�i�� FOR NNd9W3 Ad18 X3 G) M'1 >18VV4 831VM HOIH k8VN1(180=WMH0* 0 o orb.68Sr.�''� \ � 'rSV \ M«g BrLZ•Z- rIN r \ 1 o ONimine 1 SIHN30Nn s31{d ims MUM TIV � r , rco t I r S0' LZC=H10N31 89'81 L g=sni(ivd I I •�E}� ,00,0=MIIW L 6'0 L =MH W=WMHO* ��.- 3115321.1. HOVO?lddV Xv x I .. MS IS H199 t cn � I ��\ I � •.... •'1RLS 331'OMd aNnOS 130nd. OOLOO1006£t9OO 838WnN OnOMV. XVI V M.ONI tt-L Sil fill - 00-a t00 )18 SONVi3011 MVOM0aV3Ii NaIldl2 Ma IV931 A mum h' t � } " C •rah I'd' .L ll