The URL can be used to link to this page

16121 N MEADOWDALE RD.PDFiiiiiiiiiiiiii 12361 16121 N MEADOWDALE RD ADDRESS: � U I "a � NJ - TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE) -1-f51 - coo - COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: Cfv"w MZA k Lov m ai� c at on n CRITICALAREAS: TERMINATION DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: 6\--a4-q1 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: . � I - i6t -61-7 SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:- � �'A!31qS' SEWER LID FEE $: SHORTPLAT SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: 3/'j5-/cf 8, LID #: ,Conditional Waiver [:] Study Required F] Waiver LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: LATEMP\Dsrs\Fonm\Street File Checklist.doc LEGEND 0 SWTAIW MWR MAMOLE STM DRAN SUM MAN MAMCLE CONM IREE DECUXXW IME CHM UW MCE F84M YX= OR= RETAMM WALL RR TM WAMG VIALL SEIM PFE STM PM WATER PPE <� UMM POLE ANCHOR UMUTY POLE ANCHOR WMER MEM M WATER VALVE RM WALL VMW MM FENCE 32* -14"0 .Amp NINE` 'kill 11 (a *90 .19qo City of Edmonds . J Up's 13 , 19,5 'Ur Critical Areas Checklist. no Critical Azeas Checklist contained'on this fonn-is to be filled out by any pawn preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a develop to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas we or may be present on the subject property. Ihe infonnation needed to complete the ChecIdist should be casil:y a 'lable fi-orn observations of the site or vm data available. at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant� or his/her representative, fill out the cheddist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will revicwJ the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and m adA- ;nation of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit 4plication-' With a signed copy of this foram, the applicant sbould also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with cnou& detail that City staff can find and identify the-subjcct px=gs). In addition, the applicant is to include any other pertinent nnation or studies in conjunction with this Cheddist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Cheeldist and attest that the answers provided are facbtal, to the best of my Imowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Applicant Representative: & Name Name STUC-7,JV-AL 10115 %— �(Q" Dr -*-NQ') Street Address %J EVEF,'-F-T Ail A 4- 348-6 pi , L -�C i--ity, State, ZIP Phone t. PE 8-2-719.3 Signature Date Tide Street Address City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Critical Areas Checklist Site Information I ProjectName: kAKICAXLh---ZiM� Peimtt�ber. SiteLocation: 102.1 P,�\ Property Tax Account Number. III' -QQO-%9- 03 Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): AC ft- E' Have you filled out -a Critical Areas Chedidist for a project on this site before? City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: [Brian E. Moll Determination #: I CA-93-245 I Project Name: I I Permit Number: I I Site Location: 1 16121 N. Meadowdale Rd. I Property Tax Acct #: 1 5131-000-049-0103 1 Project Description: Single Family Residence Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): XXX — There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; XXX — The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; XXX — ..The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; XXX — The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. Before any permit application may be applied for, submit to the Planning Department a topographic survey prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor delineating Steep Slope Hazard Areas. Any slope over 30% with more than 10 feet of rise will be classified as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. A 50 foot buffer is required from both the top and toe of the slope. A 15 foot building setback is required from the 50 foot buffer. 2. If the results of the above survey determine the lot unbuildable, any development which is not identified as an exception per ECDC Chapter 20.15B must receive a Reasonable Use Exception or a Variance pursuant to ECDC 20.15B.180A and 20.15B.040C). 3. All proposed development of the subject lot must meet the requirements of Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development'Code. ego" - Name Signature D—a�eeo 6 The'City of Edmonds Water S(Irvice Drawing EASEMENT'NO . .................... �IkUcTION REPAIRS LID NO . .................. . ASM'I. NO . .................. NEW CONS -I I)EI01IT 110 . .................... coNTRACTOR, ....................................... k% . . .... * , , "" -'** ..... ** . ........................... OWNEP . ...... E.Rv. ............ GAL DESCRIP-rION: LOT.NO . .. ................... BLOCK NO ......... ............................................ JOBADDRESS ....... ... 1 ................................................... ............................................. 1 1 V4 . 9. 5 1 ....................... - ------- ; ....................... .......... I . ................... / ...... .............. -CIA pV4� 4.00oi-iIl75(REVMl78) C) . cr ui z - & 1 (.0 PSI '/4 :3/2.7 /9 8 MS :514 d- A/'z2'/98 ApproVC S/1-7/oo RS ......................... . ........ By DATE J��-/:g 6 PLANNING DATA NAME: B-r E , M o / ( SITEADDRESS:- 16olZl A/. MW-,wA'& Pd DATE: 111�912-7 ZONING: P-� - 2b PLAN CHK#: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Nv� CORNERLOT INfo Yes/No) FLAG LOT- (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: 'o'll ut S12LZ -A��,- 10' - 6k-� bo�� ""I"I - 3,5, Front: io'AE;* Left Side: to/35" Right Side: 10'/357' Rear: to '/35— Actual Setbacks: W Front: 7-5, Left'Side: 25' RightSide: -77' Rear: 3 1' Street map checked for additional setback required? No - (2�,4 4�i" (Yes/No) V V LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED N (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: 6ox3�)� 364 Maximum Allowed:— ---__Actual: 23 /,91:)-! ,-7- \-VL-=�. L 0`0 B UILDING HEIGHT: RA�, Maximum Allowed: 31 �ct ual Height: 31' Datum Point: Datum Elevation: 2-1 N, rW4W0a4 V--lk (4-F A.D.U. CREATED?: Me, SUBDIVISION: V1, V, V11, 4, a( P'1� bl') CRITICAL AREAS #: 93 -2 45- - 1�.h,,,a A,, 7� sle 5& V- 9 7 91 le -S, SEPA DETERMINATION: 1, gr�'> -PN S &1 /17 OYP'4s LOT AREA: 7 OTHER: 4b a,� Uf, 4", +1--� 4,o Lt, 4-,,— 3 Plan Review By: c.Tt1es\permit\�p1nndaLdac Y 71 1 -ExPIRE:5 t?0',Z)AY5 CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT C) PERMIT "�!10_ Address of Construction: / Property Legal Description (Include all easements): Owner and/or Contractor: State License No. Single Fam I ily 0 Multi -Family (No. of Units—) commercial Public Buil ding Permit. No. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: El No Yes RW Construction Permit No. Cross other Private Property No. 11 Yes Attach legal description and copy of recorded ea'semen t I certify that I have read and Aall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. � . Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE USE ONLY FOR INSPECTION CALL 92811, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Permit Fee: Issued By _4 _NJL_ oo Trunk Charge.— Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Lid No.: / 0 . Partial Inspection: S na, lk,&"r se-- er 04)9e__ Date — I nitial Co'mrnents 4,,;d C-la Reason Rejected: Date —Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date —Initial — PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE White Copy. File Green Copy. Inspector Butt Copy. Applicant Re�,sed 3!90 ki The City of Edmond Drawing EASEMENTNO . ............................................ UCTION JR- REPAIRS F-1 LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO . .................. OWNER..... ....... A4.4../ . ....... ......................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO. 2— JOB ADDRESS ... ....... AAEGAL DESCRIPTION: LUT NO . ................. .................... BLOCK NO . .................................... 10 ............ ......................................................... ..................................................................................... NAMEOF ADDITION ....................................................................................................................... 1.0 ma lio� cc� 90 ocs 7 6 ev, no r -76-rl+ 9 c- /0 irl'ay 0 I PWW-0001-1 Side S �j NEW CON Approved: 0,,rT," I / /,z 0 A& ", 57,a 0 1 Y CDL.) 6.e� DATE............................................ By ------------------------------------------------------------ 0 IV 51 The City of Edm Side S Nt,"W CON er Drawing UCTION tR- IkEPAIKS [-j EASI'-'Ml.-'N*I' NO. LID NO . ............. .................................... ASIVIT. NO . .............. �CONTRACTOR ................................ OWNER ..... ......... ................. ........................ PERMIT NO. ...E3.72-2 JOB ADDRESS ....... Ae!�2,-Tt. ..... . A --- AAEGAL DESCRIPTION: LUT 1,40 . ............................... ...... BLOCK NO . .................... .............. ................ ........... ............................. ........................................................ -------- — .............. — .................. NAMEOF ADDITION ........................................................... ........................................................... PWW-000i-1 .4. i < Ir C-6 c /0 9aoc;-57 Pu rr 4 c. Se I%j e-� 10 -u ri-, -, 7- 6 vl�o r ---* pro c ee-d , j el .0 7 C-r 6va rk, Approved: P,�r /vZOA& DATE............................................ By ................... ........................................ 1, 1-* '01 Mdersen LL=DA)CE(-- E I 13 m�, I w o r L c o r p. Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist DATE: JOB: "'�C_ z_ !T _F T LC s. 1 _Q A_L "�;C) Pull i-HASC 77JAk, 2.11. rz-L UJIA. L 4- IL 4990 k 'J� S.� N 14 VOL'i -J 12s- T' Z- 7: ET101L j 7/,q C' 4— t A P1 NED,- ' PRUY'V 9; T I ANDERSENO PERMA-SHI'ELDO WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS FOR COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL USE I � F STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM WORKSHEET OWNER %R-1A Q C-- MCUL ?E. CALC BY: ADDRESS - 10115 H b(-. WDlo�- PHONE: (20S)148 F—VE-k=-71 DATE: '"DESIGN DATA***** IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE 49,co FT-e,'�4AsE IiE 7/611 RIM ELEV 4'Q INV 8'MIN COVER ZMAX COVER 2'IAAX COVE R S CPE LOPE WR-eft CArCH BASIN WASHED GRAV EL OUTFLOW TRSNCH, MIN Ky LONG TOP AND 4 PERF PIPE TO BE LEVEL 4rMIN. SPACE Fod ELEV- FROM CONTROL & TW/CAPS T '�F W' TOP AN D 4SNP, I+ 4'PERF PIPE 4' 0 PEPE buN. T-, 0 DRIFIC RIFICE UNOFF SPREADER OUTLET INV ELEV- CONrPOL Car -le BASIN SYSTEM CROSS SECTION 3, iDbt' A- �x 6'DEEP, 4- G* OUARRY SPALLS .2 21x 3- DEEP. 3/4- CRUSHED ROCK FROM CONTROL OUTLET RIPRAP OUTLET z-,,ZZ.3 ,6 L FOOTING D"NS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED To DE7ENTION SySTEM NOTES. 1. Call Engineering Division (77 ' 1-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection before backfdling and for final inspections. 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property isthe responsibility of the property owner.' Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. Ile outlet control orifice ust be kept ot)en at all times. REV 2/92 Page 6 of-6 APPROVED BY DATE be MOLL Z7 7, A z %(Of?- a 17 3Y G WHERE k?O�E�'ZEF.IbCZNMAL �ID-c �Ekk;E-R- CROSSC-!� A& S< cl ------- T074kL LF-KG-)-HjlE-R, �-N) 7 [V�N, HIO LI:L<,. .&7 35S -Z 1AvG:z-j(& HIGH F-�Jf) jIqv� Low E.�4b =265,21 24-1.81 - 2-71.o -209.21�� IS58.2-9 241.83 - 2.5,16 ( S Lo Fr- 4`7 7-,k i i r Q—, m 17Fm ,v-- r2 -TK i x r-- 2 07--� L LF-,,,,G7.H �6c-1 NS 12.1 - + We!�;-, Ni6H E�jb 2?--1.6.41 T- 1,\j VarLT ..0- LOW -i-Z-N 5 1 . . . 22-7.&, - �2-1 16(22--1,84--2/2 5 22 -7. 84 - 11,810 '/32-" I : I Q H 2mos �b co Tm T M Ila 2 .=2 JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPT. DESIGN STANDARDS I __ ss ro'—. r FF SID C0 A CATCH VASIN TYPE 11.1 48-0 I J/ Wr z w N 5 �l �SD �IE=245_5��' - - I - - - - - T - D =220. 'S:220.n SS IE-245 5 0 HOUSE S IE=2405 1 0 ROCI(ERY R JKER OC Y 1 0 SD IE-240.5 0 Y SO I -a225.5 10 ROCKERY' C N o 23 SS IE-225. 5 (LT COATED TION PIPE CONTROL STRUCTURE CB TYPE 11, 48'0 11 It r , '* if M-11vt INA ��W, WIN, �SD SS I ��—\�\24_0 HALF RPUND CMP CULVERT, IN 1 4'-0- WIDE &NC CAP mv- 4% f 0 4 1 2� 84 7 6 �l �2 .4 r 1j... 22 2."b "I JB4 CIVIL ENGINEERIN. ll.� NUIL5: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIDE' SEWER PIPE 6'DIA. PVC INSTALL TIGHTLINE - - - - - - - - - - - 1-SANITAITY SHALL BE . SANITARY SEWER AND NTH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE IX PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS ISTANDARD INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 2. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6"DIA. PVC (ASTIM D3034 MIN) . INSTALL STORM SEWER AND TIGHTUNE VArd -WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. L41NIMUM SLOPE 1X PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATEDION THE DWGS. ' 3 STENCIL CATCH BASIN LID WITH DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO SOUND- 1/2- MIN LETTER SZE) 4' INSTALL WATER SERVICE CONN AT STREET. WATER METER, & WATERLINE TIGHTLINE ALL CONNECTIONS 44TH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UnUrY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CM OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. 5. EMBED CLEANOIJT CAP IN 16- X16* X12- CONRETE PAD 6. VISUAL INSPECTION OF UTILITY TRENCHES & TIGHTUNES REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO BACKFILL OPERATIONS. 7. BACKFILL MATERIk & COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDM6NDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DESIGN SMS. 8. FILLS PLACED ON SLOPES SHOULD BE TERRACED(BENCHED) AND KEYED INTO THE SLOPE. THE BENCHES SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE SUPPING OF THE FILL DOWN THE HILLSIDE AT THE INTERFACE OF THE EXISTING SOIL AND THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FILL. 9. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE Will-i ASTM C478 (AASHTO M199) AND ASTM C890 UNO: HAND HOLDS IN PRECAST EXTENSION RINGS SHALL HAVE 3" MIN CLEARANCE. STEPS OR LADDERS,IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6' MIN CLEARANCE. b. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED c. PRECAST: BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MIN. ALE BEACH KNOCKOUTS OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. MAX HOLE SIZE FOR 48' DIA CATCH BASIN IS 36-. MIN CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8". d. FOR DETAILS SHOWING LADDER, STEPS. HANDHOLDS ETC. SEE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBUC WORKS SID DWG 9-074 "CATCH BASIN DETAILS'. e. SHEAR/CLEANOUT GATE SHALL BE ALUMINUM ALLOY ASTU B-26-ZG-32a OR CAST IRON ASTM A48 CLASS 30B AND JOINED TO TEE SECTION BY BOLTING THRU FLANGE. WELDING OR OTHER SECURE MEANS. MATING BETWEEN MOVING PARTS AND GASKETS PER WSDOT STD PLAN B-3. cj. LIFT ROD: SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MFR WITH HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN V-O" OF!COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOOK LOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLD. h. ALL METAL PARTS & SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL�OR GALVANIZED. I. RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE CUT ROUND AND SMOOTH. WHERE CMP PIPE IS USED, NEOPRENE GASKETS ARE REQUIRED 0 ALL PIPE JOINTS. k. THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM .060' ALUMINUM OR .064 ALUMINIZED STEEL OR .064 GALVANIZED (TREATMENT I ) STEEL PIPE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36. M196. M197 & M274. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF MATCHING MATERIAL SEE DETAIL FOR THICKNESS. 1. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE ANCHORED 0 Y-O_ OC MAX WITH 5/8-DIA STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR ANCHOR BOLTS NTH 2" EMBED IN WALL. m THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CNIP SEWER PIPE NTH A STANDARD COUPLING EAND. 9. SLOPE OF STORM DRAIN (SD) AND SANITARY SEWER (SS) SHALL BE OF UNIFORM GRADIENT BETWEEN THE INVERT ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE DWGS 0 0 LEGEND 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE� 0 STORM DRAIN 0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE -SD- STORM SEWER _SS- SANITARY SEWER -V- WATERLINE _G- GAS LINE -P- POWER _T/C TELEPHONE/CABLE SA A-- NA r- Z' ARO—VE MAIK t-, L + GL T EL A Ld A7F-L-j Kr7-- EL 2-W G-7' 5-4-b—S Ov SE:U-F 1/- 2 - r\ + a+Ti=o ..I- 716-00.7E A Rc- = J/1 li / 1L( EjZ. _CCv__. 24,o. 2M. 5 I VALETTIq Ll F-7 L 136, - W L 24- 2-51 �j LF— 7Z Sig FQom 41"n—l— 2 2,22 mw 27 (3L JOB L EXCE WJAWhiteley Jacobsen and Associates SHEET NO. OF Ard*ects / Engineers / Planners 0 /2-7-95 offices: Seattle Everett CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE q ' 3 - 2 3 S . 3 ! Z 3 3 2 3 AciPizox MAN '�-F�zz-uNja- INVEI'U, F-LT-VA71'CQ (gi;\0+00� E L-- 6, C 4-..' LZ-�,2G"M� OF CATCH L-- 45 L 0 'LazwG�-,,H 70 CON-i0ifl. LIKDa- F-L 2.�C + 4-. S Lo FF- * I NJ bF--- -) F- NJ T 10 Q P I PE- �-' I (t� 3,5' ( V - ,5) = .3G'= 4.3'j 2z---L/,A TI 0.\) W�P—Z.7 e—,&NTIDUR—LI�,JE- EL130 IJU IG" '%,EV-Lj Uv-)7—=W,\jF- E L - 2 - 1. S3 - 2 2 5. (.-1 / tj\)VMZZ- OF �;I�F— �CWIF-�LC-GMN- (2, MAw '�aLFr�—UksE- - COLIF (NJ C 2-e 48v.. �a-= 21(..o4- + Z -::- 218.04- -7, E: 71 (1 k3 Z; �i Q STA I + S5 To (�� -IA G f 00 Z'45, G-I - 2 = -7, G �'. SbOPE- 07 Njl\,-G Cki-jr, t bF- C-A7C,14 �631 K�/LYIREk-T-10 \i/C0�iRIZZL Z� 7.63 - I Z-7/ C(138r- QLCV = � - — yr 3/4.1!/- 6L . 153-45 11 4ri P-7 1- 7 sau-im 1)(Y- I �JVEZT e-,'�;—iA(0+60 = 218.251 OF- �E4)E�Z ) KJ�P�C, t S TA I+ S3 2Z57.(.-71 Y8 Zv---HAIM�� 2/4"/12- E E 1116millwork corp. h�qW 1 0 Wh,l ... 1, Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 ,Mdersen 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist E: � 1- 55 JOB: L t2 -T �A --OUT.- &.--iF.1LL-- CALI�U TIC) &S- f W, Av� J. EaL L X F M V6L x 12- 1 -1�x 'LiX 2 4-- So: 57o 0-j-- T _'7-3f F-i' T V13 W, -7. 5) t 4 .8 E L 7- L _7L I-Af -US tlJoNj .—L -s- X� D K- 5 1, z -4154 do -��Q L FT- T- T _71 Y L I ANDERSENO PERMA-SHIELDO WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS FOR COMMERCIAL USE & INSTITUTIONAL 1. — -, me hCo9w 01" M Andersen JER) E E 119 A 11work corp. Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist DATE: 1- 95 JOB: MOLL A 'C7 L 2: L W!, t!- ,k 4L. +1 55 !'s J T L 1 L :3 /44-+ *0 T) LJ L Z-F I 0 L T 17 -V/7r VbL. W11-1 C-6 FfZZK EL 2W 'S(j 4� -X-LJOIT�. rt 5 ±—..7 S.t'r 1'd'a-25— 11 1- 7' -T- NE L n-' 1-114 - FLk) - -Z4?-o [3 ....... ... .. 2i .7 75 r L—L YQ x '6X .-75 ANDERSEN@ PERMA-SHIELD6 WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS FOR COMMERCIAL & INSTITMONAL'USE IN., E 4� 17/1 & "Arm" W.,.: NOWN all . . . . . . . . . . 11111111V All, *Wlilllpdagaq. W�N. —Aff zZ w Ara 4; - 7 jr IdC IVA m N--- 4ft IVA ,v ;4 j " �- W-6� Ek N 96 i. "# 4 A 0 P M L.. C �Oft . A kF-- L-i i... $41A FIX�F- US hCoof ff to P qualay V�o Mdersen E E 1153 A, Iwork corp. Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist -,*-I-- DATE: 1�5 _�qB:—/627 bLL T— t.-T RR E E IEPmillworkcorp. th'Wifflo 0 0 qff� Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 ludersen 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist D�T]�. JOB: 162=7 1 7 2.' Lr7J- CA Lc LA x 7 (0 9 . . . ItAV. A VOL VOL I x -�f JL 3�-� VOL C jr I r-- F-7 OX. - x 4 28 7 147 V6L 1): + 4. S + 4 .5x 1940. FT '.75:x (.ILS+ x FIJ, I ]1x4x i(14, �'F FT x FT 1L. A- ;$'-JCH T . ............ L F.: 4- X \0+ + L. L; JIFT �4- . ....... ... ... ------- --- T 5-7/ -- ANDERSEN@ PERMA-SHIELDO WINDOWS & PATnO DOOiR*SOR COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL'USE come. fro Mdersen E E 163M*111workicorp. Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist DATE: 7 --- T JOB: -16Z-7- �.LL Rvslz�ff-m� i 7z i Lo L�-- o+,2-+! j 0�4 'dk (4-+I'w-��)x -TT d: T, --J LL V X'�� X. r8- q� Z 2j �'x 6-7-2 cg- 7 E- z -3 S JG-q -1� T7 -9x 4x-4 3�- F-1 5 . . ........ .. . 7 i _�3 x + ?, '27 -T --4 F-T- L! V : I LF- V6 F 7 2. Jf-- 171, x (Ile 2- LI�.F 7 x� ANDERSEN@ PERMA-SHIELDO WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS FOR' b0MMERCIAi'.' & iNSTiTUTIONAL USE Y, CU 7 L'� A,�,A�lc, (:5-VOL-A -Mw VULL FA gap' an am *-V i—EVZZ .WAZA=A.1- A7 "I I P-A 04 I A7,111111 r wo 'Illlliim.. - M YLW � Amftm Ma "m MMILV mom WOW, km�t;71*, AM� - WN, I M W. t4f All ffl 4t o, mean. :!.:. !Ul t�lom nde&en A E E 113 fRi 11work corp. Wholesale Distributors Of Building Materials 19809 89th Avenue South - Kent, Washington 98064-5370 1-800-432-7332 FAX: 1-800-329-7332 CAROLYN BERGLUND Commercial Specialist DATE: (0' JOB: U T-7- X11CIG- -T I C) I S -jA -1 I lo. UEAo-. 24W 1!/V T-1 7 9 12. C Ht;G(4! I lio ... .. . ....... x 10 (3 28 N: z 1 ` x Cc 60 J1 -4—J- h:� t ICU E L A— I N I Ks-�) A . . ........... �T T -10 RE,; A� c6 N�x -�W,,LL St T T F 2- N, i ;-,j c v t. 7, fzAjj,\,C4LS 4- r ANDERSEND PERMA-SHIELD0 WINDOWS & PATIO DOORS FOR COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL,USE �11'1 Downspout and Gutter Sizing nDTH OF RECTANGULAR GUTTERS FOR GIVEN ROOF AREAS AND RAINFALL INTENSITIES PC a •uC■�.■■■.� ��.50Ifll ROMPllll, MME ..gym ?a■ ■�.-... all • . _MOM 0 0 0 0 0 0 o tv 0 0 0 U 0 O U to 0 r to a Ri m f q N _ _ IA . RAINFALL INTENSITY X AREA SAMPLE PROBLEM To size rectangular gutter for a building 120 x 30 ft loca- ted in New York City. This building has a flat roof with a raised roof edge on three sides A gutter is to be located on one of the 120 ft sides So that each section of gutter will not exceed 50 fL, three downspouts will be used with 2 gutter expansion joints The area to be drained by each DESIGN AREAS FOR PITCHED ROOFS PITCH FACTOR LEVEL TO 3 IN./FT. 1.00 _ _ 4 TO 5 I N./FT. 1.05 6 TO 81N./FT. 1.10 9TO111N./FT. 1.20 _ 121N./FT. -- 1.30 NOTE . When a roof is sloped neither the plan nor actual area should be used in sizing drainage. Multiply the Plan area by the factor shown above to obtain design area. RAINFALL INTENSITY MAP NOTE �f"P shows hourly rainfall intensity in Inches Per hour for 5 minute periods to expected once in 10 years. Normally this Is adequate for design, but some storms have been twice as intense in some areas. See local records. fence W. Cobb; Columbia. South Carolina L - LENGTH OF GUTTER IN FEET 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 I:25 1.50 0 I. 7S 3 z;00 F 2.25 m 2.50 F NOTE The terms COndUCtOf; and "down- spout all mean the same thing. section of gutter will be 1200 sq. h., the rainfall intensity to the left to intersect the vertical line representing from map below is 6 in., the length of each gutter section IA - 7200. The point of intersection occurs between the is 40 fL, and the ratio of gutter depth to width is 0.75. oblique line representing gutter widths of 5 and 6 in. The On chart above find the vertical line representing L • 40. required width of gutter is, therefore, 6 in. and its depth Proceed vertically along this line to its intersection with need be only 4 t/t in. the oblique line representing M - 0.75. Pan horizontally INFLUENCE OF GUTTER SHAPE ON DESIGN I.RECTANOULAR GUTTERS 3. SEMICIRCULAR GUTTERS Use graph at top of page. First size downspout from tables below. Then use gutter 2. IRREGULAR SHAPES 1 inch larger in diameter. Determine equivalent rectangular size and use same meth- od. DOWNSPOUT CAPACITY DOWNSPOUT SIZES INTENSITY IN IN./HR.LASTING S MIN. SQ. FT. ROOF/ SQ.IN. DOWN- TYPE SPOUT AREA SQ. IN, NOM, SIzE IN. ACT. S12E IN. 2 600 400 PLAIN 300 - ROUND 240 7.07 3 3 3 12.57 4 4 4 19.63 5 5 5 28.27 5.94 6 3 1 6 3 6 200 176 CORR. 150 ROUND 130 I 7 11.04 4 4 8 17.72 5 5 9 25.97 3.80 6 2 6 1 V. x 2 Y.t 10 120 11 110 CORR. RECT. GENERAL NOTES Most gutters are run level for appearance. PLAIN However, a slope of '/ t.. in. per foot is do RECT. sirable for drainage. For residential work allow 100 sq. ft. of roof area per 1 sq. in. of downspout. 7.73 3 1 27, x 3 Y, 11.70 4 2 Y. x 4 18.75 5 37. -5 3.94 2 1 Y. x 2 Y, 6.00 3i 2 x 3 12 00 4 3 x 4 20.W 5 37, x 4 y, 24.00 6 4 x 6 DOWNSPOUTS AND GUTTERS U u 1 1 390 Downspouts and Gutters NAIL TO + NAIL TO FASCIA FASCIA e II BOARDS c • / ,WIRE CLIP s e __ r • COMBINATION HANGER UTILITY SHANK DRIVE WITH PITCH ROOF OF NAIL TO NAIL TO SHEATH- SIDE OF ING RAFTER DRIVE HANGER VARIOUS SHANKS SHANK AND CIRCLE HANGERS Available in malleable and wrought copper, bronze, stainless steel and aluminum. Only a sampling of the wide variety of shapes available is shown. See mtrs. literature. GUTTER MANGERS w W % 'TYP. FABRICATED FABRICATED I Z RECTANGULAR BEVELED METAL GUTTER NOTES Various sizes and other shapes available. Always keep front V. in. lower than back of gutter. Do not use width less than 4 in. except for canopies and small porches. Minimum ratio of depth to width should be3to4. THIS SHAPE IS USUALLY STOCK STRAP MANGERS W STOCK OGEE OR STYLE "K' 21/2"Hx3"W 23/4"Hx4"W GA NOTE: Gutter hangers are normally spaced 3'-0" O.C. Reduce to V-6" O.C. where ice and snow are long lasting. --_ O : r"; oil 1 BRACKET MANGER SPIKE ANO FERRULE Various shapes are available. Not recommended if girth is over 15 In. GUTTER BRACKET OR STRAP SIZES GIRTH INCHES GALV. STEEL INCHES COPPER INCHES ALUM. INCHES STAINLESS INCHES UP TO 15 1/8 x 1 1/8 x 1 /I6 x 1 1/8 x 1 15 TO 20 3116 x 1 1/4 x 1 1/4 x 1 1/8 x 1 1/2 20 TO 24 1/4 x 1 1/ 1/4 x 1 1/21/4 x 2 1/8 x 2 W STOCK SEMICIRCULAR OR HALF -ROUND 4" W r. ft-- w 3 3/4" H x 5" W G A 6" W G A G A 43/4"Hx6"W G 7"W G 51/4"Hx7"W 81,W G 6" H x 8" W NOTE: Stock sizes-G = galvanized, A = alumi- num. METAL GUTTER SHAPES AND SIZES AILT R DASH LINE INDICATES ROOF SLOPE CAP TER LET�� 0j/ I. WS / 1/an �® PUIll _UTTERS HAEEN Gutters should be placed below slope line so that GUTTER ORERsnow EAVESTR000.VIDqUl/es and ice can slide clear. Steeper pitch re- IeSs Cleafance. IFDOWNBPOUTDOWN- HANGER. SPOUT PROVIDE ONE AT IS OVER PLACING OF GUTTERS TOP AND BOTTOM, PLUS ONE AT ANY 40' LONG INTERMEDIATE JOINT 4" WIDER THAN DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT, FOR DOWNSPOUTS LEADER OR CONDUCTOR SPILLING ON ROOFS F� .. DOWNSPOUT HANGER - ELBOW OR B PARTS OF A GUTTER NOTE PVC plastic gutter and downspout parts are similar to metal. See manufacturers' data for shapes and sizes. Jones/Richards and Associates: Ogden. Utah Lawrence W. Cobb: Columbia. South Carolina CORRUGATED BOTTOM OPTIONAL SPLASH PAN NOTES 1. Continuous gutters may be formed at the installation site with cold forming equipment, thus eliminating joints in long runs of gutter. 2. Girth is width of sheet metal from which gutter is fabricated. 3. Sizes listed in table to the left but not marked stock are available on special order. 4. Aluminum and galvanized steel are more commonly usad. whereas copper and especially stainless steel are least used. 5. All jointing methods are applicable to most gutter shapes. Lap pints are more commonly used. Seal all joints with mastic or by soldering. Lock, slip, or lap joints do not provide expansion. 6. See SMACNA Architectural Sheet Metal Manual for gutter sizing and details. EXPANSION JOINTS Expansion joints should be used on all straight runs over 40 ft. In a 10 h section of gutter and a 100e temperature change linear expansion will be: EXPANSION OF METAL GUTTERS IN 40 FT METAL COEFFICIENT OF EXPANSION MOVEMENT Aluminum .00128 .15 in. Copper .00093 .11 in. Galvanized steel .0065 .08 in. (D STOCK 0 STOCK CORRUGATED PLAIN ROUND ROUND FABRI - CATEO 13 STOCK PLAIN CORRUGATED RECTANGULARRECTANGULAR NOTES Space downspouts 20 ft min., 50 ft max., generally. Extreme max. 60 h. Do not use size smaller than 7.00 in area except for canopies. Corrugated shapes resist freezing better than Pie shapes. Elbows available: 45°, 60e, 75e, 90e. DOWNSPOUTS AND GUTTERS RV A OF /=222.67 123 r + 227.6 GRfZ FILE T T STREET , MW COUCH I I I I I , I I 1 I Lead Design Professional Designation & Statement l Structural Engineer ➢ eclaration A� E. WASy�N �Q� c�0 d Ilr �O 282 �0 �ISTER�S� �SSIONAL G•18.97 EXPIRES April 24, 1999 I have reviewed the Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated 1 March 1994, by DODDS Geosciences Inc. (job* 4008), and understand its recommendations. As the owner & designer I understand the risk of loss, due to slides, on the site and as the Structural Engineer of record, I have incorporated into the design, the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. (ECDC 19.05.040R) Moll Residence Phase I 0(7 W Design u sass Design Professional Designation & Declaration B. E Dion PW m«� 94-IW a.,rTn Wm MASrw �., �• Atr. amen E Moll PE.SE Decors amne m 0 STREET FILE PE-01 6r WUL� 1. - -.1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Moll Single Family Residence 1A6121 Northt-Meadowdale-Road—. Edmonds, Washington Job Number 4008 for Mr. Brian E. Moll, P.E. by DODDS Geosciences Inc. March 1, 1994 —MW %F M%W• • GEOSCIENCES INC. Post Office Box 6966 Bellevue, WA 98008-0966 Telephone (206) 867-3297 Focslmlle (206) 88 1-864 1 Brian E. Moll, P.E. 10115 Holly Drive, #D 102 Everett, WA 98204 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Moll Single -Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Reference: Preliminary Plans and Cross -Sections by Brian Moll, P.E., undated, unsigned. Dear Mr. Moll: Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 We are pleased to present our Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the proposed Moll Single -Family Residence to be constructed on the property at 16121 North Meadowdale Road in Edmonds, Washington. The purposes of our work were to professionally evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the proposed building area, and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed structure. The scope of our services included: 1) Logging and sampling of three test pits in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure. The pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 12.0 feet below existing grades. The test pits were excavated with a rubber -tired backhoe. Logging and sampling of the test pits was accomplished by the undersigned registered engineer. Samples were taken of subsurface soils at selected intervals. 2) Reviewing collected soil samples in our office and assigning laboratory tests consisting of moisture contents on all samples and two washed -200 sieve tests. At the conclusion of the testing program, laboratory results were analyzed and compared with field notes and logs. Engineering analyses were then conducted specific to meet project requirements. 3) Preparation of this summary report in accordance with our understandings of project requirements, Unified Building Code (UBC) Standards, and generally recognized local geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Efforts were made to address City of Edmonds requirements as we understand them. Plate 1 attached, provides the guidelines in the use of this report. The subject property is a flag -lot located on a west -facing slope above Meadowdale Road in Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 2. The lot is irregularly shaped, with a gentle slope along the driveway entrance, which becomes steeper as we approach the back of the lot, where the new house will be constructed. The lower areas are covered with grasses and low shrubs. There are a few trees in and around the building area. The lower portion of the slope has been reinforced with large timber beams. Other than the timber slope reinforcement, we did not notice evidence of previous development on this parcel. According to the topography provided, the slopes in the proposed building area generally range from about thirty to more than forty-five percent. • CJ MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 2 We understand a single-family residence will be nestled into the slope near the property's northwest corner as shown on Site Plan, Plate 3. The new residence will be a lightly -loaded multiple -storied structure. The construction will require maximum cuts into the hillside of around fourteen feet and fills with an approximate maximum depth of 9.5 feet. Under current plans, the fill will be generally placed over the western third of the building. During our site visit, we observed surficial conditions of the property and surrounding properties, including the slopes. We also observed, logged, and sampled three test pits excavated in the proposed building area by a rubber -tired backhoe to a maximum depth of 12.0 feet below existing grades. The test pits were logged and sampled during the excavation process. Recovered soil samples were subjected to selected laboratory testing including moisture contents and - #200 sieve gradation analyses. laboratory test results and field density information are summarized on the Test Pit Logs, Plates 4 and 5. Although there may very well be subsurface variations between the test pits and conditions not readily apparent from the surface, we expect the following subsurface interpretation to be essentially correct: The ground surface is immediately underlain with two to four feet of loose sand with variable amounts of silt. The upper layer is weathered and there are areas with abundant roots. Below the surficial sandy layer on the upper portions of the slope, the test pits. encountered a medium -dense brown to gray -brown sand with some gravel and a trace to some silt. Test Pit #3, which was excavated near the building southwest corner, encountered four feet of medium -dense gravelly silty sand under the surficial loose sand. This intermediate layer was, in turn, underlain by a medium -dense sandy gravel from eight to ten feet below existing grades, where the test pit was terminated. There was heavy abundant groundwater seepage below eight feet in Test Pit #3 during excavation. Slope Stability A computer slope stability program was utilized to investigate the stability of the property during construction, as it is our opinion that this will be the most critical and unstable time. A representative cross-section through the residence showing the cuts and slopes which are anticipated during construction was prepared. Conservative assumptions were utilized in the preparation of this cross-section. The Simplified Bishop's Method of analysis was selected as appropriate for the soil conditions. The computer analyzed over eight hundred potential slip circles through the building area and adjacent slopes. The minimum Factor of Safety (F.S.) computed for cut slopes of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) was 0.99 (F.S. = 1.0 indicates imminent failure). If we grade the temporary slope back to 1.25:1 (H:V), the Factor of Safety increase to 1.17. The computer study indicates to our satisfaction that the site is currently stable and will remain so during and after construction provided the recommendations presented in this report are adopted. • 0 MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 3 Foundations The proposed new single -story residence may be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on the medium -dense native sandy soils generally available between 2.5 feet and 4.0 feet below existing grades or on structural fill built up from these competent soils. All foundations should bear at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the adjacent outside finish grade. Compaction of the bearing surfaces prior to footing placement may be required. A bearing pressure of two thousand (2000) pounds per square foot (psf) may be assumed for foundations bearing as described above. The bearing pressure may be increased by one-third to accommodate short term wind and seismic loads. To provide protection against shear failure, we recommend continuous and spread footings have minimum widths of sixteen (16) inches and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Any structural fill that is placed under footings should extend out beyond the edges of the footings a distance at least equal to one-half of the fill depth. For example, if two feet of structural fill is placed below a sixteen -inch -wide continuous footing, the total minimum width of the fill (and the excavation) would be forty inches. We estimate that foundations bearing on the medium -dense native sandy soils will settle one-half inch. Lateral loads such as wind and seismic forces are accommodated by friction between the foundation elements and the bearing soils and/or by passive earth pressure against the foundations. However, passive earth pressure is only available if structural fill is used to backfill against the foundation, or the foundation is poured against the existing soil. A coefficient of 0.40 may be used between the foundation elements and supporting soils. As we are on a slope, the passive resistance of undisturbed native soils and structural fill may be taken to be an equivalent fluid having the density of two hundred fifty (250) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Slabs -on -Grade Reinforced slab -on -grade floors are anticipated for the new residence. Slabs -on -grade may be supported on a minimum of four inches of free -draining sand or gravel placed above competent soils. All loose soft zones should be repaired prior to placement of the subslab fill. A vapor barrier such as a sheet of a 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the slab. Any fill placed below floor slabs should meet the requirements for structural fill given below in the "General Earthwork and Structural Fill" section of this report. Excavations and Slopes Temporary and permanent excavations and slopes for this project must meet all applicable government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of four feet may be attempted vertical. Excavation slopes greater than four feet in depth should be sloped to a maximum gradient of 1.25:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Flatter slopes may be required depending upon local variations in soil conditions. All contractors working in excavations should anticipate caving of the side slopes. • 0 MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE March 1, 1994 Job Number 4008 Page 4 Permanent cut and fill slopes should not exceed 2.25:1 (H: V). All permanent slopes should be seeded with appropriate vegetation. Site Drainage The site should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the construction area. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where the foundations, pavements, or slabs are to be constructed. Final site grades adjacent to the structure should be sloped at least two percent (2%) away from the structure for a distance of ten feet. Roof and surface water drains should discharge at an appropriate discharge facility. Footing drains are required for all uphill sides of the residence, and should consist of a slotted four -inch - diameter PVC pipe bedded in, and covered with a minimum of six inches of drain rock. A non- woven geotextile fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP or equivalent) should be wrapped around the outside of the drain rock. The PVC pipe should be sloped to drain, and may be connected to the roof and surface water discharge pipe downgradient and away from the residence. Foundation Walls Foundation walls must be designed to support the lateral earth pressures which abutting soils will impose. The following recommendations are for foundation walls which are less than twelve feet high supporting the adjacent hillside: Design Parameter Value Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Unit Weight of Soil Coefficient of Friction 35 pcf 350 pcf 125 pcf 0.40 *The active earth pressure recommended assumes the wall can deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height. If this assumption is incorrect, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred psf should be added to the active earth pressure. The values recommended above are ultimate values, and should be reduced by an appropriate safety factor. As a guideline, we recommend a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The resultant force from the soil (neglecting the passive pressure force) can be calculated by taking moments about the toe of the wall. The resultant force should pass through the middle third of the footing. The above design values do not include hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads are placed above, or near the walls. Design values can also be exceeded if heavy construction equipment is allowed within a prism defined by a 1:1 (H:V) line extending up to the soil surface from the back end of the retaining wall footing. If any of these • MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE March 1, 1994 conditions exist, then the above design values should be augmented by appropriate additional pressures. If walls higher than twelve feet or steep sloping wall backfills are required for this project, please contact our office for additional recommendations. Foundation walls should be backfilled with clean compacted, free -draining granular soil or an approved drainage composite. This will prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. The wall should contain no more than five percent silt or clay, no organics, and no cobbles greater in diameter than four inches. The percentage of sand (From the #4 sieve to the #200 sieve) should range from 25 to 75 percent. During compaction of wall backfill, care should be taken to not damage the wall. The top one to two feet of wall backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil. The two not -to - scale drawings on this page present a graphic a summary of some of our recommendations. SLOPE SURFACE TO DRAIN FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET Job Number 4008 Page 5 SLOPE SURFACE TO DRAIN FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CUT SLOPE GEOTE)MLE FABRIC APPROX e' -F V MINIMUM 2 FEET APPROVED APPROVED DRAINAGE CUT BACKFILL COMPOSITE SLOPE WATERPROOF WAILS AS SPECIFIED DRAIN ROCK GEOTEXTRE FABRIC APPROX 6' 1— SLOTTED 4' PVC FOOTING DRAIN APPROVED BACKFlLL I HSLOTTED 4' PVC FOOTING DAMN MINIMUM 1 FOOT BEfWEEN1AND 2 FEET r ATERPROOF WAILS /AS SPECIFIED DRAIN ROCK The drawing above shows a typical detail for a retaining wall which is backfilled with free -draining soil. The drawing to the left is a typical section for a retaining wall which is constructed using drainage composite. MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 6 Rockeries The construction of rockeries is to a large extent an art not entirely controllable by engineering methods and standards. Hence it is imperative that rockeries be constructed with care and in a proper manner. The work should be performed by experienced contractors. The base course should be placed on the native medium -dense sandy soils at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the final adjacent grade. Where there exists retaining cut slopes less than six feet high, or fill slopes less than four feet high, rockeries may be constructed entirely of four -man rock. Rockeries placed in front of six to eight foot high cut slopes should have one course of six -man rock at the bottom. Rockeries with a height of eight to ten feet should have at least two courses of six -man rock at the bottom. For rockeries with a height of ten (10) to twelve (12) feet, there should be at least three base courses of six -man rocks at the bottom. The remaining courses may be four -man rock. Any fills behind a rockery should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D-1557. Rockeries placed in front of fills greater than 4 feet in height should be designed as a reinforced soil wall. The rock should be hard, sound, durable, free of seams and cracks, and broken in cubical shapes. The rock density should be at least one hundred sixty-five (165) pcf. Six -man rock should weigh at least six thousand (6000) pounds. Four -man rock should weigh at least two thousand (2000) pounds. The drawing below is a typical section through a rockery. 1 TO 2 77 r � Fran -draining baokflll (max. 5% fines) min. 8" wide layer of 2" - 4' quarry spells adjacent to rookery. HEIGHT Stable cut face 1 diameter washed gravel• min6overpipe; min. 2" gravel under pipe. (Tin. 0hlOht) T ♦r�:.:�i•• -� MIN. 12' A °.';:rl. _ _____ Min. 4" diem. pert. pipe; min. 1 % continuous slope to outlet; pipe and/or cut face lined with filter fabric (Mlrafl or equivalent). GENERAL NOTES 1 . Rock shall be sound and have minimum density of 160 pounds per cubic foot. 2. The long dimension of all rocks shall be placed perpendicular to the wall. Each rock should bear on two rocks In the tier below. 3. Improved walking surfaces above and adjacent to rockeries over 30" In height shall be protected by a guardrail conforming to UBC 1711. 4. Rockeries are erosion -control structures, not retaining walls. The on -site material must be stable and free- standing in cut face. i PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES Job Number 4008 MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE page 7 March 1, 1994 General Earthwork and Structural Fill ripping and clearing the building areas of all deleterious Site construction should begin by st material. Stripped materials should be removed from the site. during our excavation of Test Pit seeping,3 and the contractor noted at eight feet below existing gradesg should anticipate and be prepared toaccommodate impact cut slope stabilite to y, and this ofheavy fice should be into e excavation. Heavy seepage may adversely � notified if heavy seepage is observed out of any of the cut slopes. The site is moderately vulnerable to erosionduring an gexcavati excavationactivities. Depending upon the filter fabric fence be installed downslope y weather, hay bales placed a certain key locations may also be required. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed below er sheaiand uig e Structural fi1avments where 11 should be fill soils need to support loads without unacceptabledeflections o placed above unyielding site soils in maxi � � Foundation wallland subsl b backfise lifts and ll should be acted to 95 percent of Modified Proctor (ASTM D 15 ) of 90 percent ofModifieded materialr octor. Moisture -sensitive soils typically compacted to a minimum Some of the on -site soil has significant have a significant percentage of fine-grain fine-grained material (silt), and is therefore s soils wetter than the ptimum moitive. These soils ll ture content at place and compact as structural fill w these the time of compaction. During wet "'� t five °T scent siltnder eor clay structural fill should that portion consist of a granular soil having less the pe which passes the 3/4-inch sieve). Fills which are placed on slopes, should be keyed he hillside on the uitere. face between benches should be deep enough to preclude slipping of the fill down the previous hillside surface and the bottom of the fill. Closure It is recommended that we be retained to provide professional geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during design and construction. This allows us to: 1) confirm that design conforms to specific subsurface requirements; 2) confirm that subsurface conditions during construction are consistent with those indicated by this report; 3) evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities conform to the intent of the contract specifications and plans, and; 4) provide recommendations for design changes in the event of changed conditions. While on the site during construction, we will not direct or supeon-srvise safety the contractor or the work, nor we will be responsible for maintaining providing or dimensional measurements during construction activities. • MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE March 1, 1994 Job Number 4008 Page 8 It has been a pleasure providing you with our professional services. If there are any questions, please call me directly at (206) 867-3297. Sincerely: DODDS Geosciences Inc. 7 �`� K- DSO �PwA•sy,�.,. &V 22508 • T� • 9FGISTE. ZONAL ECG EXPIRES Mark K. odds, P.E. MKD/wd enclosures: 5 Plates and Legend DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. GUIDELINES IN THE USE OF THIS REPORT This report for Job No. 4008 was prepared acNodwarrantce l�islocal exp generally for accepted engineering principles and standards.Y implied. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the limited services which you requested. Geotechnical engineering requires the application of professional judgment, as no study can completely quantify subsurface conditions. The owner should seriously consider any recommendations. for additional work contained in the report, as it is then our professional opinion that this additional work is necessary to augment and/or fulfill site specific requirements. This report is an informational document, and is not to be used for contractual purposes. Any interpretation of subsurface conditions in the report including the test pit logs, and/or text discussions areob based P°n �a testing,e subsurface experience, and judgment. There is warranty interpretations represent subsurface conditions other than that which occurred at the exact locations tested at the time the fieldwork was conducted. Groundwater levels can be especially sensitive to seasonal changes. This firm is not responsible for interpretations others make using this report. The conclusions and recommendations in this report assume that the field tests that were conducted accurately represent subsurface conditions of the site. If, during construction, significantly different subsurface conditions are encountered from those described in this report, our firm should be notified at once to review these conditions and revise our recommendations as necessary. Also, if there is a significant lapse of time between this report submittal and the start of work at the site, our fum should be allowed to review and verify site conditions. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered during excavation and construction, and simply cannot be fully anticipated by periodic soil and/or rock sampling at widely spaced testing locations. The owner should be prepared to accommodate potential extra costs through the development of a contingency fund. This firm cannot be responsible for any deviation from the intent of this report including, but not limited to the nature of the project, the construction timetable, and any Job Number 4008 - Plate 1 construction methods discussed in the Guidelines report. This firm will not be responsible for Moll Single Family Residence any construction activity on this site, nor are 16121 North Meadowdale Road we responsible if others attempt to apply this Edmonds, Washington report to other sites. ,ODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. NORTH Job Number 4008 - Plate 2 Vicinity Map Moll Single Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington I \ 1 1 I 1 I I \ \ 1 \ 1L 1 1 \ 1 N \ + 1 I s\ e � 1 \ 1 , \� \\TP12 \ 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 1 ► I 1 0 1 1 1 1 \ D \ t \ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I \ 1 1 1 , TO-30, I ' 1 \► 1 I 1 1 1 \ \ 1 \+ � � \\ 1 � 1 \ a000 Co I 1 1 1 1 \ +\ \ 1 ► \ t 1 1 \ + 1 \ \ oly 1 \ + \ ' \ � � \ 1 1 \ ► 1 ` 0 1 1 ore � \ o4 a NORTH 0 Approximate location of test pit. I i I I Site Plan PPROVED BY: MKD BY I MOLL Single; Family Residence I i Job Number 4008 Edmonds, Washington DODDS Geosciences Inc. NUMBER 3 ' MAJOR DIVISI* USCS DESCRIPTION Gravel Clean Gravels GW Well -graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand and (little or no fines) Mixtures, Wide Range of Sizes GP Poorly Graded Gravels. Gravel -Sand Coarse Gravelly Grained Sow Mixtures Soils More Than 50% Coarse Gravels with GM Silty Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Silt Mixtures Fraction Retained on Some Fines GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Clay No. 4 Sieve Mixtures Sand Shy Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, and Clean Sand Wide Range of Sizes SP Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands. More Than Sandy Soils (little or no fines) 50% Material Mostly One Size or Missing Sizes. Larger Than More Than No. 200 50% Coarse SM Silty Sands. Sand -Silt Mixtures. Sieve Size Fraction Retained Sands with No. 4 Sievvee Some Fines SC Clayey Sands. Sand -Clay Mixtures. Inorganic Silts, Rock Flour. Clayey Silts ML w/ Slight Plasticity. Ash Fine Grained Silts Liquid Limit and Less Than 50 Inorganic Clays of Low to Med. Plasticity Soils Clays CI' Gravelly Sandy Clays, Silty Clays. Organic Silts and Organic Silty OL Clays MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or More than Diatomaceous Silty Soils. 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller than and Greater Than CH Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity No. 200 Sieve Clays 50 Organic Clays of Medium to High Size OH Plasticity Organic Silts Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils, Topsoil with Organic Soils Highly g PI. High Organic Contents Fill Highly Variable Constituents Component LL-JjU Component Boulder Size Bag Above 12" Cobbles 3" to 12" Gravel #4 sieve to 3" Sand #200 sieve to #4 sieve Silt or Clay Soil Description Below #200 sieve Guide Percentage Description of Each Component Descriptive Term Percentaee Ranee "Trace" 0 - 5% "Some" 5 - 15%n Adjective (e.g. sandy, silty) 15 - 35% "And" 35 - 50% Notes: w 1) Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. 2) The Discussion of the Text of This Report is Necessary for a Proper Understanding of the Nature of the Material Presented in the Attached Logs. ' • . , . .v .... n :.v:: -: n :cosc� ::..c:a•i.um•,- � :o :^ v.•::: :• _•- osv.c :::• �; ' Ring # - 3.0" O.D. split barrel sampler driven with 140 lb. hammer falling 30". Numbers are blows per 12 inches. SPT # = 2.0" O.D. split barrel sampler (ASTM D-1586) driven with 140 lb. hammer falling 30". Numbers are blows per 12 inches. LEGEND Boring and/or Test Pit Logs TE& PIT t -- W c� DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 z a �► cn w a X EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe 4U o vi a = o LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. cn ❑ a ❑ cn 3 _j DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 0 Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. 1 I.0-2.0 10.4 SP/SM m Brown Sand with some Silt to Silty Sand, Moist, Loose with roots. to SM 2 -200 = 8.3% 2 3.0-4.0 5.2 SP/SM m Gray Medium Sand with some Gravel, Trace to some Silt, Moist to SP 4 :: to Very Moist, Medium Dense. -200 = 3.2% Isolated roots at five feet. 6- 8- 3 9.0-10.0 2.5 m 10 12J Stopped at 12 feet. No groundwater seepage noted during excavation. TEST PIT 2 w a� cn L) DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 o n 3 cn c CL EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe N U) cr LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. cn o i N DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: O Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. SP/SM 2 o. o. 0 ; . to SM °.o°;• Brown Medium Sand with Some Silt, Moist, Loose. o: • 'o: 4 SP to SP/SM Gray Brown Medium Sand with some Gravel and Trace to some Silt 6 and Cobbles, Very Moist, Medium Dense. $ Dense below 8.0 feet. Stopped at 9.0 feet. No groundwater seepage noted during excavation. 10 12 DODDS Geosciences Inc. P.O. Box 6966 LOG OF TEST PITS 1 AND 2 TEST PIT Moll Single Family Residence Bellevue, Washington REPORT Tele: (206) 867-3297 Edmomds, WA TMT PIT 3 0 d) z cn W L) DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 CL :5 cn C_ CX _j (L cL EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe W 0 (U X M 0 L) ch in U) < 0 ix 0 (D _j DESCRIPTION LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. 0— SURFACE ELEVATION: Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. 0:.. .0 1 1.0-2.0 11.6 SM 2— D:-' Brown Silty Medium Sand, Moist, Loose. 4— 'qo D. "i( Gray Gravelly Silty Sand, Wet, Medium Dense. 2 5.0-6.0 12.8 SM 'qo -200 = 20.5% 6—. .0 * 0 q 0 8— Below eight feet becomes Gray Sandy Gravel, Saturated, Medium Dense. Heavy Flowing Seepage at eight feet. GP - Q. 10— � Stopped at 10.0 feet. Groundwater seepage noted at 8.0 feet. 12 DODDS Geosciences Inc. P.O. Box 6966 LOG OF TEST PIT 3 Bellevue, Washington Moll Single Family Residence Tele: (206) 867-3297 Edmomds,WA TEST PIT REPORT MEMO TO STREET FILE 16121 North Meadowdale Rd October 31, 2007 SUBJECT: Moll Residence Engineering Final Inspection of Single Family Residence The City of Edmonds Engineering Division has inspected and approved the civil site improvements as required with the development of the single family residence at 16121 North Meadowdale Rd. The owner of the subject property is aware of the requirement for and is in the process of securing an easement from the adjacent property owner, 16123 North Meadowdale Rd, for that portion of the sanitary sewer line that crosses the adjacent property. n'oE7mLLW-. t;3i .Zoc;-� Jeanif NUonnell, Engineering Program Manager Date TE CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 (206) 823-9800 EVERETT (206)259-0817 JUAI ATTNf THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIELD TEST DATA RRF—/RT No_ �p TE D5-? CE D�- -.1 PROTr6' pSlG�'�2��" �� S LOCATION f PERMIT NO. OWNER TEMP. AT AM AT AT P M EN _ � a, Y ARCHITECT C TORS TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO. MIX NO3 3 q3 TIME SLUMP %AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT FACTOR ` TEMP. CONC'` :.AIR' TYPE OF BREAK' Cone Cone and split Cone and Shear . Shear Columnar (a) (@) (C) (d) (e) COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN 1 V. ADJUSTED WEIGHTS MOIST WEIGHTS ..c : / n6�ir�� ;•. 3 FA c ` ImOt� WATER Z TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE AREA (SO. IN) TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI TYPE BREAK 7 -Z zv SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE PAJ DATE TEST.METHOD APPLICABLE CODES & SPECS. PRODUCERS: CONCRETE AEA ADMIX. :.`: PL'ACEMENT AREA & NOTES CEMENT L i I L CU. YA.RDS PLACED 3(E ;AC12 r"' % DESIGN STRENGTH MM/ s j TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS (� 4.4 4' 6 MCICASCADE 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE rpy PREVIOUS /� 7 REPORT No. 1J - No: KIRKLAND. WASHINGTON 98034 4_ a )4 Js'800 DATE CER N EVERETT�ZOV 17. JUN 181998 ROJEC f euto ING DEP7 LOCATION _ ,rTP/ER"� % OWNER TEMP. AT AM AT D O ►vl • ENGINEER ARCHITECT ATTN: .. CONT ACTOR, / Cam.✓ �(/ `U G (2) (3) INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED —FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEEUCONCRETE. _ RESTEEL ONLY I: _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB _ RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STNVELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES _ COLUMNS STR.ST/BOLTING DRILLED PIERS OTH R — — — WALLS J ' — BEAMS (4) LOCATION (AREAS) CONCRETEIMASONRY :rr MIX NO. z/ �1 y,3 DESIGN STRENGTH (Pc) �AAwY'Si (lam SUPPLIER Cr./�(//yj� TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED/� �` �C� 7 �' SLUMP (INCHES) SPECIMENS CAST WQ>lI�`Y r 2L�a✓ AIR CONTENT (%) SEE CYLINDER. REPORT NO. YES _ NO _ ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: r�'jrICOPIES TO: ` :''jFORM NO. CTL-89.1 ial INSPECTOR: FIELD I 1. 1 ��,�`! FIELD TEST DATA r & -Y�/ 29675 RFPORT Nn_ DATE Zo O �- CERy AO6- T� [ PRO%/,v LOCATION ` / rp�� j ✓ BLDG. PERMIT NO. DD 5 7 OWNER ER � � TEMP. AT AM avy AT PM ARCHITECT C TORc TRUCK SAMPLED TRUCK TICKET NO. MIX NO,3 3 0 TIME I SLUMP % AIR UNIT WEIGHT YIELD CEMENT ;, FACTOR TEMP. CONC`' AIR Zr 3 f r TYPE OF BREAK Cone Cone and split Cone and Shear Shear (a) (b) (c) . (d) Columnar (a) ,.nMPRFSSIVF STRFNGTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS 1 % MOIST ADJUSTED. WEIGHTS FA. 0.0 WATER Z' TOTAL CYLINDER NUMBER DATE MADE DATE TESTED AGE DAYS SIZE AREA (SO. IN) TOTAL LOAD STRENGTH PSI TYPE BREAK q37105 ��zV 3 F 3 173-7,S I 570 O 7 -Z zv 113 3o q 7o SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAMPLE P/U DATE TEST METHOD APPLICABLE CODES & SPECS. PRODUCERS: CONCRETE CEMENT L f-)[- CU. YARDS PLACED 3( AEA L ADMIX. '� CACI2 % DESIGN STRENGTH ..'.PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES INSPECTOR: COPIES TO : ` 'L'✓y~�� SIGNED: CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TESTING & INSPECTION / ENGINEERS PREVIOUS ®�5101 12914. N.E. 126TH PLACE REPORT NO. NO. KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98034 .(425) 823-9800 EVERETT(425) 259-0817 DATE CERT. NO. A�7 I D PROJECT LOCATION TO: `O BLDG. PERMIT NO. OWNER 1 WEA R TEMP. AT AM 106 (_ JoLdVO A T/Z tl M J``\ oGrfC ENGINEER S ..LNG CX a` \� Vy ARCHITECT j ATTN: CONTRAR t 3 INSPECTION PERFORMED ITEMS INSPECTED — FOUNDATIONS _ RESTEEUCONCRETE _ RESTEEL ONLY _ FOOTINGS _ SLAB RESTEEUMASONRY _ STR.STM/ELDING _ AUGER CAST PILES OLUMNS _ Q *11 Z!WALLS- THER — STR.ST/BOLTING — DRILLED PIERS ctiO�clElo I — BEAMS (LOCATION (AREAS) 0 0 Al A al+-t"o v, CO�30NCRETE/MASON 00 MIX NO.Q� I DESIGN STRENGTH (Pc) SUPPLIER TOTAL CU. YD. PLACED i SLUMP (INCHES) � SPECIMENS CAST � YK (L94,90 ou /e 0 O SEE CYLINDER REPORT NO. �( �l 31 AIR CONTENT (%) _YES —NO —ITEMS INSPECTED WERE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BLDG. DEPT. APPROVED PLANS, SET NO. REMARKS: COPIES TO: / r" P' A 2 2 SIGNED: Revised 12/97 CASCADE TESTING. LABORATORY, INC. TESTING &.INSPECTION / ENGINEERS 12919 N.E. 126TH PLACE KIRKLAND; WASHINGTON 9803A . ('425) 823-9800 EVERETT (425) 259.0817 ATTN: B �� THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: FIELD TEST DATA FIELD Q 95'w ( ` REPORT No. DATE CERT. NO. ROJECT — o /( &, LOCATI N 12 ( >'a BL7PERMIT NO. OWNER 90057 WEA TEMP. AT AM O Uj AT t / ENGINEERwo Q ARCHITECT CONTRACTOPfq } C, TRUCK SAMPLED. TRUCK TICKET NO. U 5- MIX NO. O13 TIME SLUMP ASTM C-143 a/c AIR WE T ASTM C-138 YIELD CEMENT FACTOR . ASTM CONC I AIR 110 AIR TEST METHOD: ❑PRESSURE ASTM C-231 OR ❑ VOLUME ASTM C-173 ' TYPE OF BREAK: (a) Cone (c) Cone and Shear (e) Columnar (b) Cone and Split (d) Shear CnMPRFSCIVF -QTRr-MfZTH BATCH DATA FOR 1 CU. YARD DESIGN WEIGHTS % MOIST ADJUSTED WEIGHTS C ENT FA. cA;, O WATER TOTAL "UrrAo up SAMPLE P/U DATE _& RS. CONCRETE-2a�A,'/—1. �Q PLACEMENT AREA & NOTES TEST METHOD U ASTM C-1231 ❑ ASTM C-617 SAMPLING IN ACCORDANCE WITH rAPPLICABLE CODES & SPECS. I CEMENTAy! J' CU. YARDS PLACED AT CACl a7o ~� DESIGN STRENGTH`/ 3000 it COPIES TO: SIGNED: 77a2ln:�2 REVISED - 9/97 4 r,� RETURN ADDRESS:;% City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 9802040108 02/04/98 10:26 p.0005 Recorded Snohomish County COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: Grantor(s): (1) VgAt.1 E- KoL� XSC (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 5 Twn 27 Rng 4E Qtr SW OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 5131-000-049-0103 (2) _Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: .2 6 DATE: 62 6 PAGE L OF 5 ' Under the review procedures 'established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: E VED FOR RECORDING: DATE: / 2$ Z OF 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of 16121 N. Meadowdale Rd. Edmonds, Wash. 98026 (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: PORTIONS OF TRACTS 49&50 MEADOWDALE BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, AND TRACT 50, MEADOWDALE BEACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 42, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY LOT 2 OF SHORT SUBDIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS.FILE NO. S-13-91 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME.2552,PAGE 1536, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by. technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number S 3 005'_- (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of i i;; APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: -26 DATE: ZS PAGE 3 OF 5` the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless.' The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or EAPPROVE:DFOR RECOPM -DATE: 1129 9S OF -6- arising out of any false, misleading, or 'inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs,* successors and interests 'or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except. to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. A E 75- OR RECORDING: DATE: Z8%, OF n �,I DONE this r % day of 1993. OWNER(S) By: C, &t Brian E. Mol I, PE, SSE By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF Sao ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that _1,5,?I A Al /~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 7 day of �ti,�,�� , 199. ' l_✓. _.s.�_-r—E'•-r .v^ % yam.. t�P./� .O.v, NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: \' L:\TEMPIBUILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT 07/18/1997 13:58 • 2068818641 DODDS C IN - Post Office Boor 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Telephone (423) 827-1084 Facsimile (425) 828-9443 DODDS GEOSCIENCES Brian E- Moll, P.E. 10115 Holly Drive, #D 102 Everett, WA 98204 Subject: Plan Review Ptvposed Moll S]1'ntnggle-Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Reference: Plans and Cross -Sections by Brian Moll, P.E. Dear Mr. Moll: J U N 211997 PAGE 01 Job Number 4008 July 18, 1997 In accordance with your request, the undersigned engineer reviewed the above material. The purpose of this review was to assess suitability of the project for development in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements. We recommend that the two relatively -close rockeries proposed for the slope near the northwest corner of Phase III be replaced with one large rockery constructed entirely of minimum six -man rock. It is our opinion that the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in the geotechnical report, and after the one correction mentioned above is eomRleted, the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in the report. The proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. Please contact the undersigned directly at (425) 827-1084 if there are any questions, Sincerely: DODDS Geosciences Inc. MKD/wd MICROFILM Zoo vrM TM L9t 90ZQ MST L6/TZ/LO a o V/25/1994 06:48 2068818641 DODDS GEOSCIENCES PAGE 01 o K , Post Office Box Q385 Kirkland, WA 98083 7e/ephone (4$5) 827-1084 Facsimile (4Q5) 8Q8-9443 Brian Moll C/o WJA 1218 Third Avenue, Suite 306 Seattle, Washington 9810I Subject. Addendum #1 — Plan Review Proposed Moll Residence 16121 N. Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Dear Client: CITY COPY Job Number 4008 September 17, 1997 In accordance with the requirements of the City of Edmonds, further analyses were conducted by our firm, The purpose of our additional work was to fulfill the citv's requirements regarding analysis of possible landslides over the next 25 year period, Our analyses indicate there is lass than a thirty percent (,43051*') probability of a landslide on this property over the next 25 years. The proposed on -site improvements increase the orcement via walls and controlled drainage. stability of the site by providing slope reinf Nour judgment the plans and specification prepared by the structural engineer conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report and the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the report. The proposed development does not increase the potential for slope movement. Please contact me directly if there are any -questions. Thank You: DODDS Geoseiences Inc. ee �. MICROFiM O4Jz� 7/LZ 01/20/98 08:14 FAX 208 407 8441 WJA Plan Cheek # 97-191 Date: 3 October 1997 Fmjcct xamt/Address: Moll Residence 161Z1,N.,Mfwd wdale Rd. COnf9d Fersonf Address: Brian E. Moll PE,SE 10715 ,iady Dr #D102 Everett, WA 98204 Row: Pion Reutew CJMCttunsytr Jamal of EN6Irttertng Deyt. To: Jim walker, City Engineer Dear Jim, Q 003 qszvsAl0)- Please eanstder my regest for it drtveway si ye o f zo% & to the topograyhy of my site. The site falls N a steep sbve area, which has also ?7gWred me to get it reasonable use vartanee. (See Aitackv=ts) Stncerelyi Brian E. Moll PE,SE / )221 qg iA% a ;U e s- o r o(r�° 2 ,�� s � ; � �e w �y w . to +6 20 % WCROFILM CITY COPY veo v� N Plan Check # 97-19I Date: 27 June 1997 {—_ Project Name/Address: Moll Residence 16=121 N. Meadowdale Rd. Y � Contact Person/Address: Brian E. Moll PE, SE 10115 Holly Dr #D102 Everett, WA 98204 Reference: Engineering Dept Comments dated 20 June 1997- attached Response to Engineering Comments 0 U I L 0 1 N 6 JUN 3 G 1997 Response to item 1: The house was designed to be yhased, see 1st sheet of civil Eng calcs. All phases are shown on At C1.2 and sht C1.4. The driveway is shown on sht C1.2. 1 felt it wasyrudent to design the drainage for the anticipated future imyervious area when allyhases are comylete. Response to item 2: The Geotechnical Engineer of Record isyresendy reviewing myylans, we are to meet next week to finalize the erosion control An. That ylan will be forwarded onto the city ASAP. Response to item s: The width of the driveway is shown on the transverse section detail 2/C1.5, the slope is shown on the Driveway longitudinal section E-E/CI.5. The slope is 2% from Sta 00 to Sta 1+00, it is 12% from SU 1+00 to Sta 2+00, and it rises to 30% for the remaining 20'. _ Response to item 4: A SEPA Ci.__ii:_a Sincerely N 70& SSE. Brian E. Moll P.E., S.E. '20Slum *\� 0,VVV 1 2, I it OF ED,,, 1 -z\ 1J.1ktvkw-W t qeJ, Purpose of Checklist: CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEP.A), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: ) rwis tti3 EL �''g L a 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Page t of 24 CHKLT.DOCII-NOVAS MASTER%PEA ;a 4. Date checklist prepared: J S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. F, (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. �qJ }i� y�`-'� , % 17 A,J LP..- I\�4iF� �V 6 �0 (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.DOC11•N0V-93 Page 2 of 24 MASMMSPBA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) A� tea 56 su b�. ti;, R �?Clu� r, cn A�- 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. I T I� f r 1 H. _t 1' ( i r l`3 i ''* �1 Pal t l to 1 A�i (STAFF COMMENTS) U IIJ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (STAFF COMMENTS)_ 1 61 21 l�l . Mg,%, , Page 3 of 24 CHKLT.DOC%I-N0V-93 MASIERWEA TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat ollin , hilly, seep slope ,mountainous, other: r�liit' ln� 'a 11�r ACT /I (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. LM (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) RC41-41 o� (sl- Cre<1 �t t�C ss w �1,;y� -tom T.''7 r,{*, nn, t" 5 4 e 44tl `* Xy l Page 4 of 24 CHKLT.DOI'16N0 V-93 MAXTEMSPEA e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (STAFF COMMENTS) 5-00 - 5 10 r-, JG� - 3ic� Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A&JT; AtI 2— TO R!a.J' A-J7D- � (L-r Fr,—t;{ Pt i km S..ia)C �' " Jr. - (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? y j / -f lx-4 c� (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: .°1ti h 2. AIR a. (STAFF COMMENTS) What types of emissions to the air. would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.DOC\1-NOV•93 Page S of 24 MAST&R\SPBA b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. �'l (D (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NIA (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 6 of 24 CHKLT.DOC1!•NOV•93 MAMMSPSA (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 0j, ►,d (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ij " 1 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 of 24 CNKLT.DOC\I-NOV-93 MASIERISPEA (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. rU A k'7 ' tJT; t ►J aJ'.= l s sf :�� .6 r� i r1� '` t� (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. (" (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page g of 24 CHKLT.DOC1l•NOV•93 MASMSPBA 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X, evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs grass_ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ,)mo- Kjziruz,,� Wiu- it--- cic",-)LElb (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. I -)Lc l�ja (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 9 of 24 CHKLT.DCC%I-NOV-93 MAMMSPEA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 1,2UM W L t"'. (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle; -songbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver,er: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. U0�Wl.--j ti (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 24 CHUT.DMI-NOV-93 MAMR%SPEA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: F.E—�� ft,,, £ Miff=r OFr� i?��" K�:'d�'.M-i QKe'-•.PIdAAG'',tor. " IIq7.,r Ae4\''n \J-Jf( ,J—i�7r aJ il}{JZ_1 V 1,1hL�,t'�T F-tik (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? ]Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 11 of 24 CHUT.DC01-NOV-93 MASIEMSPEA 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. i ) "K,.Q ,i10 (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: U N<W` - JI3 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? tt (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 12 of 24 CHUT.D001-NOV-93 MAEMR44PEA (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 13 of 24 CHUT.DOMI-NOV-93 MASTEMSPEA C. Describe any structures on the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) & If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 14 of 24 CULTZ001 NOVW93 MANMMPEA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (STAFF COMMENTS) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? fio 4 (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing.and projected land uses and plans, if any: rr (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.DOC11-NOV•93 Page 15 of 24 MASPERISPEA 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. ,j "J(D a® (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: LIZA (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. Whatis the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? Rom C (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 24 CHUT.DMI-NOV•93 MASTEMPEA b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Arl-WE. Ma L 10' Mov�-: TxA.r-n- I( AF:: , I I Clfr cel t'l (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Tr (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 17 of 24 CHKLTMMI.NOV-93 MASMMSPEA d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: ( )� (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. 7 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page I8 of 24 CHKLT.DOC%I-NOV-93 MASrER\SPEA 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or neat to the site? If so, generally describe. V-)1_1 (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. fit �'�^i1i^='i'T'- �ii'�i',='�ti�'��►�� T.a )o A ti At- (STAFF COMMENTS) CHKLT.D0C11•N0V-93 Page 19 of 24 MASMR1SPEA b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? ± A'Pf (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Z-. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). rig, (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �N10 (STAFF COMMENTS) Pap 20 of 24 CHUT.DMI-NOV-93 MASMRNSPEA f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. i + (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce [`orprcontrol transportation impacts, if any: Tit) .�J (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 21 of 24 CHKLT.DOC\1-NOV-93 MASIERVSPEA 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at -the site: a ectrid �n ral ^gaP'water refuse service elephone ariiary sew�ra�ius other: _...- (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. r '171) V": U1i �j K) OP7--j 1 "fir �• �-; xi �--i t,-c �! �XT- (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent r n ^ `) j r 7 Date Submitted Page 22 of 24 CHKL2D0C.91-NOV•93 MASfEMSPBA D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine -life? Proposed'measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Page 23 of 24 CHKLT.DMI-NOV-93 MASMM\SPEA 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Page 24 of 24 CHKLT.DOC\I•NOV•93 MASTEMSPEA r :-1 • • '• ggoo516+ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Moll Single Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Job Number 4008 WAIF SOFA _M for Mr. Brian E. Moll, P.E. by DODDS Geosciences Inc. March 1, 1994 JUIN 1 9.lf"9 Cov. GEOSCIENCES INC. Post Office Box 6966 Bellevue, WA 98008-0966 Telephone (206) 867-3297 Facsimile (206) 88 1-864 1 Brian E. Moll, P.E. 10115 Holly Drive, #D 102 Everett, WA 98204 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report • Proposed Moll Single -Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Reference: Preliminary Plans and Cross -Sections by Brian Moll, P.E., undated, unsigned. • Dear Mr. Moll: Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 We are pleased to present our Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the proposed Moll Single -Family Residence to be constructed on the property at 16121 North Meadowdale Road in • Edmonds, Washington. The purposes of our work were to professionally evaluate subsurface soil and groundwater conditions in the vicinity of the proposed building area, and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed structure. The scope of our services included: 1) Logging and sampling of three test pits in the immediate vicinity of the proposed structure. The pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 12.0 feet below existing grades. The test pits were excavated with a rubber -tired backhoe. Logging and sampling of the test pits was accomplished by the undersigned registered engineer. Samples were taken of subsurface soils at selected intervals. 2) Reviewing collected soil samples in our office and assigning laboratory tests consisting of moisture contents on all samples and two washed -200 sieve tests. At the A conclusion of the testing program, laboratory results were analyzed and compared with field notes and logs. Engineering analyses were then conducted specific to meet project requirements. 3) Preparation of this summary report in accordance with our understandings of project requirements, Unified Building Code (UBC) Standards, and generally recognized local • geotechnical engineering practices. No other warranty is expressed or implied. Efforts were made to address City of Edmonds requirements as we understand them. Plate 1 attached, provides the guidelines in the use of this report. The subject property is a flag -lot located on a west -facing slope above Meadowdale Road in • Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 2. The lot is irregularly shaped, with a gentle slope along the driveway entrance, which becomes steeper as we approach the back of the lot, where the new house will be constructed. The lower areas are covered with grasses and low shrubs. There are a few trees in and around the building area. The lower portion of the slope has been reinforced with large timber beams. Other than the timber slope reinforcement, we did not notice evidence of previous development on this parcel. According to the topography r provided, the slopes in the proposed building area generally range from about thirty to more than forty-five percent. 0 MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 2 We understand a single-family residence will be nestled into the slope near the property's northwest corner as shown on Site Plan, Plate 3. The new residence will be a lightly -loaded multiple -storied structure. The construction will require maximum cuts into the hillside of around fourteen feet and fills with an approximate maximum depth of 9.5 feet. Under current plans, the fill will be generally placed over the western third of the building. During our site visit, we observed surficial conditions of the property and surrounding properties, including the slopes. We also observed, logged, and sampled three test pits excavated in the proposed building area by a rubber -tired backhoe to a maximum depth of 12.0 feet below existing grades. The test pits were logged and sampled during the excavation process. Recovered soil samples were subjected to selected laboratory testing including moisture contents and - #200 sieve gradation analyses. laboratory test results and field density information are summarized on the Test Pit Logs, Plates 4 and 5. Although there may very well be subsurface variations between the test pits and conditions not readily apparent from the surface, we expect the following subsurface interpretation to be essentially correct: r The ground surface is immediately underlain with two to four feet of loose sand with variable amounts of silt. The upper layer is weathered and there are areas with abundant roots. Below the surficial sandy layer on the upper portions of the slope, the test pits encountered a medium -dense brown to gray -brown sand with some gravel and a trace to some silt. Test Pit #3, which was excavated near the building southwest corner, • encountered four feet of medium -dense gravelly silty sand under the surficial loose sand. This intermediate layer was, in turn, underlain by a medium -dense sandy gravel from eight to ten feet below existing grades, where the test pit was terminated. There was heavy abundant groundwater seepage below eight feet in Test Pit #3 during excavation. • Slope Stability A computer slope stability program was utilized to investigate the stability of the property during construction, as it is our opinion that this will be the most critical and unstable time. A representative cross-section through the residence showing the cuts and slopes which are • anticipated during construction was prepared. Conservative assumptions were utilized in the preparation of this cross-section. The Simplified Bishop's Method of analysis was selected as appropriate for the soil conditions. The computer analyzed over eight hundred potential slip circles through the building area and adjacent slopes. The minimum Factor of Safety (F.S.) computed for cut slopes of 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical) was 0.99 (F.S. = 1.0 indicates imminent failure). If we grade the temporary slope back to 1.25:1 (H:V), the Factor of Safety increase to 1.17. The computer study indicates to our satisfaction that the site is currently stable and will remain so during and after construction provided the recommendations presented in this report are adopted. • LJ • MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 3 • Foundations The proposed new single -story residence may be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on the medium -dense native sandy soils generally available between 2.5 feet and 4.0 feet below existing grades or on structural fill built up from these competent soils. • All foundations should bear at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the adjacent outside finish grade. Compaction of the bearing surfaces prior to footing placement may be required. A bearing pressure of two thousand (2000) pounds per square foot (psf) may be assumed for foundations bearing as described above. The bearing pressure may be increased by one-third to accommodate short term wind and seismic loads. To provide protection against shear failure, we recommend continuous and spread footings have minimum widths of sixteen • (16) inches and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Any structural fill that is placed under footings should extend out beyond the edges of the footings a distance at least equal to one-half of the fill depth. For example, if two feet of structural fill is placed below a sixteen -inch -wide continuous footing, the total minimum width of the fill (and the excavation) would be forty inches. • We estimate that foundations bearing on the medium -dense native sandy soils will settle one-half inch. Lateral loads such as wind and seismic forces are accommodated by friction between the foundation elements and the bearing soils and/or by passive earth pressure against the • foundations. However, passive earth pressure is only available if structural fill is used to backfill against the foundation, or the foundation is poured against the existing soil. A coefficient of 0.40 may be used between the foundation elements and supporting soils. As we are on a slope, the passive resistance of undisturbed native soils and structural fill may be taken to be an equivalent fluid having the density of two hundred fifty (250) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). • Slabs -on -Grade Reinforced slab -on -grade floors are anticipated for the new residence. Slabs -on -grade may be supported on a minimum of four inches of free -draining sand or gravel placed above competent soils. All loose soft zones should be repaired prior to placement of the subslab fill. A vapor barrier such as a sheet of a 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the slab. • • Any fill placed below floor slabs should meet the requirements for structural fill given below in the "General Earthwork and Structural Fill" section of this report. Excavations and Slopes Temporary and permanent excavations and slopes for this project must meet all applicable government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of four feet may be attempted vertical. Excavation slopes greater than four feet in depth should be sloped to a maximum gradient of 1.25:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Flatter slopes may be required depending upon local variations in soil conditions. All contractors working in excavations should anticipate caving of the side slopes. Ll • MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 4 • Permanent cut and fill slopes should not exceed 2.25:1 (H:V). All permanent slopes should be seeded with appropriate vegetation. • Site Drainage The site should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the construction area. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where the foundations, pavements, or slabs are to be constructed. Final site grades adjacent to the structure should be sloped at least two percent (2%) away from the structure for a distance of ten feet. • Roof and surface water drains should discharge at an appropriate discharge facility. Footing drains are required for all uphill sides of the residence, and should consist of a slotted four -inch - diameter PVC pipe bedded in, and covered with a minimum of six inches of drain rock. A non- woven geotextile fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP or equivalent) should be wrapped around the outside of the drain rock. The PVC pipe should be sloped to drain, and may be connected to the roof and surface water discharge pipe downgradient and away from the residence. • Foundation Walls Foundation walls must be designed to support the lateral earth pressures which abutting soils will impose. The following recommendations are for foundation walls which are less than twelve • feet high supporting the adjacent hillside: Design Parameter Value • Active Earth Pressure* 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Unit Weight of Soil 125 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.40 • *The active earth pressure recommended assumes the wall can deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height. If this assumption is incorrect, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred psf should be added to the active earth pressure. The values recommended above are ultimate values, and should be reduced by an appropriate • safety factor. As a guideline, we recommend a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The resultant force from the soil (neglecting the passive pressure force) can be calculated by taking moments about the toe of the wall. The resultant force should pass through the middle third of the footing. The above design values do not include hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads are placed above, or near the walls. Design values can also be exceeded if heavy construction equipment is allowed within a prism defined by a 1:1 (H:V) line extending up to the soil surface from the back end of the retaining wall footing. If any of these 0 r 1 L I • • r. u MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE March 1, 1994 conditions exist, then the above design values should be augmented by appropriate additional pressures. If walls higher than twelve feet or steep sloping wall backfills are required for this project, please contact our office for additional recommendations. Foundation walls should be backfilled with clean compacted, free -draining granular soil or an approved drainage composite. This will prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. The wall should contain no more than five percent silt or clay, no organics, and no cobbles greater in diameter than four inches. The percentage of sand (From the #4 sieve to the #200 sieve) should range from 25 to 75 percent. During compaction of wall backfill, care should be taken to not damage the wall. The top one to two feet of wall backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil. The two not -to - scale drawings on this page present a graphic a summary of some of our recommendations. CUT SLOPE SLOPE SURFACE TO DRAIN FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET APPROVED BACKFILL GEOTEXTILE • FABRIC APPROX.6' SLOTTED 4' PVC FOOTING DRAIN 0 MINIMUM 2 FEET CUT SLOPE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC APPROX.6' APPROVED DRAINAGE COMPOSITE WATERPROOF WALLS AS SPECIFIED DRAIN ROCK SLOPE SURFACE TO DRAIN FOR A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET Job Number 4008 Page S BETWEEN 1 AND 2 FEET APPROVED ., pSSPECIFlm BACKALL w... DRAIN ROCK SLOTTED 4' PVC H FOOTING DRAIN MINIMUM 1 FOOT The drawing above shows a typical detail for a retaining wall which is backfilled with free -draining soil. The drawing to the left is a typical section for a retaining wall which is constructed using drainage composite. • U r1 U MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 6 Rockeries The construction of rockeries is to a large extent an art not entirely controllable by engineering methods and standards. Hence it is imperative that rockeries be constructed with care and in a proper manner. The work should be performed by experienced contractors. The base course should be placed on the native medium -dense sandy soils at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the final adjacent grade. Where there exists retaining cut slopes less than six feet high, or fill slopes less than four feet high, rockeries may be constructed entirely of four -man rock. Rockeries placed in front of six to eight foot high cut slopes should have one course of six -man rock at the bottom. Rockeries with a height of eight to ten feet should have at least two courses of six -man rock at the bottom. For rockeries with a height of ten (10) to twelve (12) feet, there should be at least three base courses of six -man rocks at the bottom. The remaining courses may be four -man rock. Any fills behind a rockery should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D-1557. Rockeries placed in front of fills greater than 4 feet in height should be designed as a reinforced soil wall. The rock should be hard, sound, durable, free of seams and cracks, and broken in cubical shapes. The rock density should be at least one hundred sixty-five (165) pcf. Six -man rock should weigh at least six thousand (6000) pounds. Four -man rock should weigh at least two thousand (2000) pounds. The drawing below is a typical section through a rockery. 1 TO 2 6 F 1 C HEIGHT _LMIN:.12_ _I Min. 4" diam. pert. pipe; min. 1 % continuous slope to outlet; pipe and/or cut face lined with filter fabric (Mlrafl or equivalent). GENERAL NOTES 1 . Rock shall be sound and have minimum density of • 160 pounds per cubic foot. 2. The iong dimension of all rocks shall be placed perpendicular to the wall. Each rock should bear on two rocks In the tier below. 3. Improved walking surfaces above and adjacent to rockeries over 30" In height shall be protected by a MC 1711. guardrail conforming to 4. Rockeries are erosion -control structures, not retaining walls. The on -site material must be stable and free- standing In outface. Free -draining backfill (max. 5% fines) min. 6" wide layer of 2" - 4" quarry spells adjacent to rockery. Stable cut face 1" (or less) diameter washed gravel; min. 6" over pipe; min. 2" gravel under pipe. PLACEMENT OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Job Number 4008 March 1, 1994 Page 7 General Earthwork and Structural Fill Site construction should begin by stripping and clearing the building areas of all deleterious material. Stripped materials should be removed from the site. Heavy seeping groundwater was noted at eight feet below existing grades during our excavation of Test Pit #3, and the contractor should anticipate and be prepared to accommodate moderate to very heavy seepage into any excavation. Heavy seepage may adversely impact cut slope stability, and this office should be notified if heavy seepage is observed out of any of the cut slopes. The site is moderately vulnerable to erosion during construction activities. We recommend a filter fabric fence be installed downslope of any excavation activity. Depending upon the weather, hay bales placed a certain key locations may also be required. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed below structures and pavements where the fill soils need to support loads without unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be placed above unyielding site soils in maximum eight -inch -thick loose lifts and compacted to 95 percent of Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557). Foundation wall and subslab backfill should be • compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of Modified Proctor. Moisture -sensitive soils typically have a significant percentage of fine-grained material. Some of the on -site soil has significant fine-grained material (silt), and is therefore moisture -sensitive. These soils will be difficult to place and compact as structural fill if these soils are wetter than the optimum moisture content at the time of compaction. During wet weather or under wet conditions, structural fill should consist of a granular soil having less that five percent silt or clay (measured on that portion • which passes the 3/4-inch sieve). Fills which are placed on slopes, should be benched and keyed into the slope. The benches should be deep enough to preclude slipping of the fill down the hillside on the interface between the previous hillside surface and the bottom of the fill. • Closure It is recommended that we be retained to provide professional geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during design and construction. This allows us to: 1) confirm that • design conforms to specific subsurface requirements; 2) confirm that subsurface conditions during construction are consistent with those indicated by this report; 3) evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities conform to the intent of the contract specifications and plans, and; 4) provide recommendations for design changes in the event of changed conditions. While on the site during construction, we will not direct or supervise the contractor or the work, nor we will be responsible for maintaining or providing for on -site safety • or dimensional measurements during construction activities. u • di • • 11 C • • 11 MOLL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE March 1, 1994 Job Number 4008 Page 8 It has been a pleasure providing you with our professional services. If there are any questions, please call me directly at (206) 867-3297. MKD/wd enclosures: 5 Plates and Legend Sincerely: DODDS Geosciences Inc. i �K K. Do WASy/"Cl rtl" • 7 22508 ; .9FGISTEA�. ��ONAt ECG Vfs'JF,VBW I Mark K. Dodds. P.E. 0 I• [] • • • 7 • • • DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. GUIDELINES IN THE USE OF THIS REPORT This report for Job No. 4008 was prepares � acNo�atranty�islocal exp generally for accepted engineering principles and star implied. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are based upon the limited services which you requested. Geotechnical engineering requires the application of professional judgment, as no study can completely quantify subsurface conditions. The owner should seriously consider any recommendations for additional work contained in the report, as it is then our professional opinion that this additional work is necessary to augment and/or fulfill site specific requirements. This report is an informational document, and is not to be used for contractual purposes. Any interpretation of subsurface conditions in the report including the test pit logs, and/or text discussions are based upon our testing, analysis, experience, and judgment. There is no warranty that these subsurface interpretations represent subsurface conditions other than that which occurred at the exact locations tested at the time the fieldwork was conducted. Groundwater levels can be especially sensitive to seasonal changes. This firm is not responsible for interpretations others make using this report. The conclusions and recommendations in this report assume that the field tests that were conducted accurately represent subsurface conditions of the site. If, during construction, significantly different subsurface conditions are encountered from those described in this report, our firm should be notified at once to review these conditions and revise our recommendations as necessary. Also, if there is a significant lapse of time between this report submittal and the start of work at the site, our firm should be allowed to review and verify site conditions. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered during excavation and construction, and simply cannot be fully anticipated by periodic soil and/or rock sampling at widely spaced testing locations. The owner should be prepared to accommodate potential extra costs through the development of a contingency fund. This firm cannot be responsible for any deviation from the intent of this report including, but not limited to the nature of the project, the construction timetable, and any construction methods discussed in the report. This firm will not be responsible for any construction activity on this site, nor are we responsible if others attempt to apply this report to other sites. 0 i• DODDS GEOSCIENCES INC. • F-1 • • • • • NORTH J • u • 21 E Li 11 • • • ` 1 + 1 1 I I 1 \ \ \ \ ` ► \ 1 ► + 1 1 � t tp 1 1 I + \ 1 , I 1 \ \ \ 1\ ► 1 I I 1 + � 1 t Vb \TPk\k `TP TO-3+ I ►\ 1 1 1\ ` \\ \ \\ ► \\ 1 \ 1 1 I 1 ► I \ \ / � \ ` \ 1 \\ ► ` ` 1 1 \I \Nll�t i 1 \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ ► I + � 1 \ /�� \ \ ► 1 1 1 + 1 \ \ o " 1 `\ \ 1 1 1 \ ► 0 1 1 lk a00-1 \ \ % R \ a NORTH I 0 ApproxI imate location of test pit. I i to P 1 an BY: MKD MOLL Single Family Residence Edmonds, Washington DODDS Geosciences Inc. DRAWN BY U REVISED Job Number 4008 DRAWING NUMBER 3 71 r Ll MAJOR DIVISIONS USCS DESCRIPTION Gravel Clean Gravels GW Well -graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand and (little or no fines) Mixtures, Wide Range of Sizes GP Poorly Graded Gravels. Gravel -Sand Coarse Gravelly Grained Sow Mixtures Soils More Than 50% Coarse Gravels with GM Silty Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Silt Mixtures Fraction Retained on Some Fines GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Clay No. 4 Sieve Mixtures Sand SW Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, and Clean Sand Wide Range of Sizes Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands. More Than Sandy Soils (little or no fines) 50% Material SP Mostly One Size or MissingSizes. Larger Than a More Than 200 50% Coarse SM Silty Sands. Sand -Silt Mixtures. Sieve Size Fraction Retained Sands withNo. Some Fines Sc Clayey Sands. Sand -Clay Mixtures. 4 Sievvee Inorganic Silts, Rock Flour. Clayey Silts ML w/ Slight Plasticity. Ash Fine Grained Silts Liquid Limit Less Than 50 Inorganic Clays of Low to Med. Plasticity Soils and Clays CL Gravelly Sandy Clays, Silty Clays. Organic Silts and Organic Silty OL Clays MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous or More than Diatomaceous Silty Soils. 50% Material Silts Liquid Limit Smaller than and Greater Than CH Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity No. 200 Sieve Clays 50 Organic Clays of Medium to High Size OH Plasticity Organic Silts Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils, Topsoil with Organic Soils Highly g P I, Hi Organic Contents Fill Highly Variable Constituents Component Listing Component Size Range Boulder Above 12" Penetration Resistance Guide Cobbles 3" to 12" Gravel #4 sieve to 3" Ring # = 3.0" O.D. split barrel sampler driven with 140 Sand #200 sieve to #4 sieve lb. hammer falling 30". Numbers are blows per Silt or Clay Below #200 sieve: 12 inches. Soil Description Guide SPT # = 2.0" O.D. split barrel sampler (ASTM D-1586) driven with 140 lb. hammer falling 30". Percentage Description of Each Component Numbers are blows per 12 inches. Descriptive Term Percentage Range; "Trace" 0 - 5% "Some" 5 - 15 % Adjective (e.g. sandy, silty) 15 - 35% "And" 35 - 50% Notes: 1) Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. 2) The Discussion of the Text of This Report is Necessary for a Proper Understanding of the Nature of the Material Presented in the Attached Logs. I • • • r L_ Lm 0 TEST PIT 1 w Ln DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 o a r U w a s EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe `� LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. in o X ch 3 _j DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. 1 1.0-2.0 10.4 SP/SM m Brown Sand with some Silt to Silty Sand, Moist, Loose with roots. to SM 2 -200 = 8.3% 2 3.0-4.0 5.2 SP/SM m :: Gray Medium Sand with some Gravel, Trace to some Silt, Moist to SP 4 to Very Moist, Medium Dense. -200 = 3.2% Isolated roots at five feet. 6 3 9.0-10.0 2.5 m 10 12 Stopped at 12 feet. No groundwater seepage noted during excavation. o d OL L to N "o �0 w to cn o X n w a ii Cn (D _j DESCRIPTION 0- Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. o. • o. SP/SM 2 0 to SM °;o°; Brown Medium Sand with Some Silt, Moist, Loose. o. • o: TEST PIT 2 DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. SURFACE ELEVATION: 4 SP to SP/SM Gray Brown Medium Sand with some Gravel and Trace to some Silt 6 and Cobbles, Very Moist, Medium Dense. $ Dense below 8.0 feet. Stopped at 9.0 feet. No groundwater seepage noted during excavation. DODDS Geosciences Inc. P.O. Box 6966 LOG OF TEST PITS 1 AND 2 TEST PIT Bellevue, Washington Moll Single Family Residence Tele: (206) 867-3297 Edmomds, WA REPORT • • • LN r ' Lo • • 0 TEST PIT 3 v w L) DATE EXCAVATED: 2/11/94 o a cn a a EXCAVATION METHOD: Track -Mounted Backhoe `-' LOGGED BY: Mark K. Dodds, P.E. cn o i cn (5 _j DESCRIPTION SURFACE ELEVATION: 0 Brown Silty Sandy Topsoil. 1 1.0-2.0 11.6 SM ° 2 °.• ° Brown Silty Medium Sand, Moist, Loose. 4 ° .a o. 0 o ,•0.0 Gray Gravelly Silty Sand, Wet, Medium Dense. 2 5.0-6.0 12.8 SM m -200 = 20.5% g •.o '. 0. o o. o $ Below eight feet becomes Gray Sandy Gravel, Saturated, Medium Dense. c : Heavy Flowing Seepage at eight feet. GP •o o ' •o 10 Stopped at 10.0 feet. Groundwater seepage noted at 8.0 feet. 12 DODDS Geosciences Inc. P.O. Box 6966 LOG OF TEST PIT 3 TEST PIT Bellevue, Washington Moll Single Family Residence REPORT Tele: (206) 867-3297 Edmomds, WA rlei Lod •: ,,,Ij'G�. it �� jai'- ��' a:. ♦ � � � . iw t way• i� t '1N 31v J5 i:z:�7)�BPA%GPTBGW/BPUDLUPR'3dVW A.UIV001 x =J MS 1S `L < M* MS ld F Lv � I tr I tl I gi ♦ I � = MS Id H41W 'SFlltu f z L 9 _ �• �1, `C C inz3 H19L1 Cti w 1S H19LL �.:::_:.:::.:':::.:: S 1S ti a Z 1 I >, Ms al ix r2 j> lSc i) n > l C1 H1st1 Od N x MS I I N<ly 1s�d H1SLl v 2 (7 z 1S j(� I MS ld D v O!i Id m I H1SCl� °�° 11 ` oti3 Ms MS i x 1 F 1 M 1 _ MS i -dam D I HELL < t"' 1.4 ELl _ = 2 MS ld c• pIS H bLl ,p fN r 1 a MS Id I ld oHELI o , adfc Ms lS I MS z D `1i16U O I <` I aNZLI r I -f Mso>,clt /�y�. d is < MS iS I� x so ONZtI is ° t y oH£Ll� d a a y I 6 MS d ONZL = S d ONZ[t ` ptt tr I J ly3 d /V-S "O IS w �/ ONZLL I MS 1S ONZLI� r MS 1S �.�a r ,� MS 1S 6� MS i ap S O O 70 ml r ld MS 1 <Ir� j 1SICt y° i < oF1ZLl I l` S oNZLI MS Md` O, MS 1S HlOLI p MS = _�� I z 1 1 i x x I It o I 1S�N paa - - M D- - - !s Dtou I �s Id "+`a 1 I i MS ld H10Lt Mg.M )�,a H10Ill i°0^ -�I'-- ----{-- - --_- MSl PIF;i9 H169_ I�I - 3 1S � H1691 rr,5 ld 37 OMOOh3W s�� rt D < I H1891 < 1 �I _ OOb311� 1 rr MS 1S H1891- 1 MS 1S H189 ld H199L i MS Q IS H189 l Htt9t Q p PAS am,; :L o173 Hl 9l a s` r = MS-- MS�I = Z O ...1. ... ..... .... ...::FY�m -O n _ _ h1H3A38 1 t o : i °r° < Id H1591 W I r ♦. �_. v, 7 M I D 1 ld 000M S ld D H1991 m Q b 31Ivl i VH1HVWl= I �a�9�M I < nns dt� ; < _ ldHt9l <�_<FI�� yea MS 1S H.LI I < I I MS 1S — n Ms Ms Id is Hicsi—s'`i� lE9l I I t• I ( H169t� 1 I �tS 30" � 1 MS -id oH£9t ,_y y I MS is ONi9f I y ° i1 l e Xbvd 49 N U 03 I X I IS 1j� x a - �, fAS ld 1S31NN9t O r I MS ldl= aNZ9Ms >, ls,�O or 1 M AV —�—! w �� i I I 11 Z, I �aNZ9 v, I MS Id = H10911 <t m `o'I F--._....-- -- J1v Ics IYVIYM — ms_ — _LS H1091 = Fa W ► I �� o x = i I� - -�- - - i; NO1cJn83tf7 . ( Z M$ Ul I 66 I AAS ld H18SI 2 U r- I-4 1 MSld 1 fir= 1 I I 1SH18S1 --I I Ms ld v MS Id I�1L5U= ....,,...... Nddd.ID' : • M 1S H189t 1 _ = faH x1vol _ _ Ni 1S H1LSl <` N7b38t. MS� OQb�YV x i...,3JDOMOOV3W H. I 1S H1951 o rms is H199i D 1S D H195SAMN a}IHi;1'9S1 <m +►D. <>D 1S HISS[ 1r<t cn p I < DH1DS N.S Id BESI 1Sldo1E51 oM 1S 3G 0. MS Id .: MstS <F art51 --- �. p oo' �1S ONZSt ;•XS Id, MS oNZ9l o d`yb H1051 i I S ells t1S`($ (>e1 L — L '— —tr ..—A\S Id Host ld }I 1SD51 Z5 v I < MM S Id H16C1 I 1S MS d %..s ld S_ 166t <� 6z, ale- 3► da HOd38 MHON H1661 HIM;Sld'• �,�� f= I�Ia3HSl3 ! GAME 18b1 g 4l N 1 I MS � tt 1S m <o M 40t N�Lr< < HOt{3 bWHON MS ,, MS ld= Hilt[ -0 f rOd Y i'^ H `, -7 CC11�-1 I w ^' a M� ld `-it < _ Ms 1sNH�1MId 19o1i t1'S�o,s S Nl�l iJ �8 13✓I Id D ld H19C1 A MH15a lrC H bl l2 •ate i v $�,2- �M��S �ld-tSbl .n g'rol `�1S 1 V WO ..., ._ .— .._—...�._�.._ I MS c h t' 7 �� (0 ltl n l 1 ... _ ._ cc1z WAVE STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM W ORKSHEET OWNER �iZ.IA IQ C. MOLL ADDRESS - 10115 Hold* tr . # .D 10 2- EVc t=j. U A %74 4 CALC BY: w PHONE: i2C1348 -GC I 'L DATE: I I/I ✓95 *****DESIGN DATA***** IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA 49,co F=r2e,-1�ji: DETENTION PIPE LENGTH RIM ELEV [[MIN COVER I J 2'MaX COVER y i jj\ 4-0 's '—r-SLOPE L z _ � PIPE LG ORIFICE 7/619S WASHEDUT GRAVEL OUTFLOW TRENCH, MIN IO' LONG TOP AND 4'PERF PIPE TO BE LEVEL 6'MtN SPACE ELEV FROM /RIIM CONTROL E' OUTLET t� T4'PERF PIPE W/CAPS 0= PIPE MIK INV ELEV Lif°CR CA/CN VA SIN CONTROL CAJCN BAS/N SYSTEM CROSS SECTION SUgN1iT 4 9FXX sue, �a�-� '-OCA-1 UNOFF SPREADER OUTLET ELEV a 7: 6- DEEP, 4-_ 6- OUARRY SPALL S DEEP, 3/4- CRUSHED ROCK FROM CONTROL OUTLET RIPRAP OUTLET FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. Call Engineering Division (77.1-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection before backfilling and for final inspections. APPROVED BY 2, Responsibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. 'Ile outlet control orifice must be kept open at all times. prif ') io,) Page 6 of 6 3.-,k i 7 NbNDS SIN 17AZ.0 SEs..LF—1 Ivv�r- Nia2 TcTAL LF-u6TH . l�E7,)E�N MAIN HOLD$. 1 Uj T @, HIGH `.Uf) wl A vF @. -p 2.4-1.83 - 2-I-7.�,9 (241.83-2c9.21� C = 241. 83 - 25, 28 LrjFr- r- lcy DS S c?,-t Sa.Kc;Z -Lj za - 1 I lx iiEZE(l%E�� T1A<✓ STG(L� 5�,, TES itv� Hi6H c-G' EaS� ..1,L��fLT Low- CNJ - 212, 51' !� ": �1. J��'VEiZ; @; i1C I+V LLic ,1ot� = 22-7.8� —�2-1.33 (225?.SG = 22-7, 84 - 11.80 • „1 CTA j0j:cC( Ri 0 ELF-U (9-TLj oF- 2l-6- -5 s _7 -1-12- 1 F7T-/ li /P7 RL-MVCZU-r-iC&MA-6f 00-:= S DE N WRT -ke 7= 7FT E-L.24_4-AG - - ------- ------ 246,! .225.5 ELa/rl 11 GA ; .. , / ^ '/n------''«�- Y-----�=�»��----------------� ° ! � -------------- / ^^ � ~ � ' r FI&__---_ ' / _ » * � , ITT t Jill 2,21 ��.�' . ,. y+r,��i AF, ,.-v. . ��ti%. •.1J��r� . �. •.3.r w„l •v. ., �..'-v-.,.�.. ,'9, 4'l.lin.. - �'f,44.f`!—� 7:`A:•._,{.�:., , City of. Edmonav . CON N 117 C. .1S9v RIGHT -OF - WA STRUCTIO PERMIT Permit Number. ,. Issde Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 14121 N . H r=ADOI. hA 1-G_7 RD B. Type of Work (be specific): S�4 1,T40 , C. Contractor: 'fin A i c Mailing Address: 141)5 State License #: D. Building Permit # (if applicable): E.- ❑ . Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ Multi -Family 9 Single Family INSPECTOR: $ Contact:. Phone: (47_s1741-4-Mn Liability Insurance: Bond: $ Side Sewer Permit a (if applicable): ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) j 1 ❑ Other / a INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: >4Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: �x �_ H.-Charge ,�- / APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his s'"gnature to this application to hold the City/of f�mondskharmless from injuries: damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: Date: 3 •S 9k (Contractor or. A ent) J -CALL'DIAL—A—DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: 100 4441 41 TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER tt. �9 DAYS SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 6q 02 or RIGHT OF WAY FEE: G o . Q0 DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 11l: RESTORATION FEE: T OTAL FEE: �D . D4 RECEIPT NO.: / / / R 7 rr ISSUED BY: NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Egg. 1997 • FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (F'iin 111 - Route' copy to . Street Dept.) Comments Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: _ - .`v CITY OF EDMONDS F,, yyo 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) EET FILE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Construction of a single-family residence which requires a Reasonable Use Exception/Variance to allow the residence to be constructed on a steep slope, Height Variance to allow a tower on the house to exceed the height limit of 25 feet, a Building Permit for the single-family residence and associated grading on the site of more than 500 cubic yards of materials. (City of Edmonds File V-97-91 and PC-97-191). Proponent: Brian E. Moll Location of proposal, including street address if any: 16121 North Meadowdale Road, Edmonds, Washington Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by ?' /19 /9 7 Responsible Official: Jeffrey S. Wilson Position/Tide: Current Planning Supervisor, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: (425) 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 121 - 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: `6 -) % Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 - 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 5e0 r. ?- . 1997, by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Jeffrey S. Wilson to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX XX V•97.91D.DOC 7/31/97.SEPA Posted on 1997, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the dmonds Post Office. Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Page 1 of 2 1 Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 XX Applicant: Brian E. Moll 10115 Holly Dr., #D 102 Everett, WA 98204 pc: File No. V-97-91 File No. PC-97-191 SEPA Notebook V-97-91D.DOC 7/31/97.SEPA Page 2 of 2 0 0 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONM NTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat ollin , hilly, steep lope , mountainous, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 13 c^l To -IT (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? U you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A tJ C) (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or bistory of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. o f (STAFF COMMENTS) Rc-" of l6r o+�s, 4 -►g r+-m -1yA-A4k _ l e vas ti rlo za zynd AY, P^e� Page 4 of 24 cHKLra=i-xov-93 MA$WSPBA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Aiso 'l b6'nubts. u,z. �k��sn �c/an'nr.�c � G�tbctr�� o-A 5•}� `�vag,e� rM.dl {`L�'ri bl- V�4^�t.VKQ V 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. J (STAFF COMMENTS) U 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or'detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. (STAFF COMMENTS) i 1 21 N. M�a,;, W ckA i o d. Page 3 of 24 CHX TMMI•NOV•93 MASMSPBA " _ d CITY OF EDMONDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST St. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). 'For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," ,"applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 14 C i—L i tF-_ - 2. Name of applicant: ) ,PUA tJ 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Ilk, WA 4- - �-{>l�lr: t°�2��) �� 1 t•!'i^ t 1x�Rs;, (�C.'() �' � � ''�''91 cHxLr.00c1-N0v-93 Pagel of 24 MASi8 ORA 4. Date checklist prepared: U ' L� 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): r _ (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. T1 till) Ui T:• 1L1. ,,Tf_t c.t TZ 3 Q FT Z,, (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. "' (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 2 of 24 CHUT.DOC11-NOV-93 MASrBRXsPRA • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Aim ft=o bsryab . u;z. ,xe4nm l✓'ar�ar.a ia� %autrwrh�n r>l! r 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. �l .A:f'1 i L..3a 1 -V QZ �i'l,r � %_ s A1l� i r, -� � - J (STAFF COMMENTS)_ 81% 500 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. OF Sy(,;�I�C�iJc�_r. (STAFF COMMENTS) i (;, t 21 �f. Mop �1.aio P—A , - Page 3 of 24. CHKLTJDMI-NOV-93 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, Collin), hilly, sfeep slope , mountainous, other: Crz-m(AL Arm!- Cl !7X &.;U9T (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? C1i T ) is (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 1 Qh (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 'Wo (STAFF COMMENTS) 16r MOO, aUtsi M) -fw. a OZ rtc�k oets, -- -► t MWuJ d e. Leas t,�,to 44a z-d Ate, rw a Page 4 of 24 CHK6TAO01-NOV-93 MASfBR\SPRA C. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. (STAFF COMMENTS) Soo f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. I•.i T =!1 r7T R . To 9 i L-r 1` [tea mT, m(.4� v � (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. L,;� ��-��yJ CMS V. A �..,. ., ...�._.... •w�ri :v.r,:�-ed..�, t!•'iL,. )`. T P7- S:..ti/M?"—tr"_T� (STAFF COMMENTS) Page S of 24 CHKLT.DOCU•NOV•93 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: A N L PJ:: 10 lkta i -wg (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of.the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Z8 (STAFF. COMMENTS) Page 6 of 24 CHUT.D001-NOV-93 MASIBR%PBA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: M 01 i 1UTIq a �S--N (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle; -songbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ther: 1'1(J�: r�r?J.hJ fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 24 11 0 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: xI shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? W LL- f9z- -Ap-r—t) -nq�7 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 9 of 24 CHKLT.D=I-NOV-93 MAVERWEA (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. i•J C:l (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. rA��. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. t11 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 of 24 • • (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. �� T CITE.► -ar,_M 5: ,� (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Grp 0[raAlr. /� J- L, �� Ai'?,fr`: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 8 of 24 CHKLT.D=I-NOV.93 MASURWEA d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: /� p , t ! 7 {� ..1V.:� A LW 1 9V h N AI VI F� kj7R W LPL 1•, (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: A birds: hawk, heron, eagle; fongbirds other: ?� mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, ther.) 14�(1C...ZO'J. JO fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. v <MMAI1J (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 24 CHKLT.D=I-NOV•93 MASMR1SPBA d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 77 -, +a y� n i JKvc-P :" fVf--*4Pr:C o -Ng- A.Co&z:r•.P) Y,,t,ir to A4\�n �%� �,..i�f'..�,'_.i�"r• s� � �1)[3#'i_� �. �i�i�1:4i. ��_ f'ltAb� !r :ti �� ti .�!•ryP':"Pi�r. <�r (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? if so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 11 of 24 CHUT.DMI•NOV•93 MASMILWELA 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. V MQJO,nl,fIJ . .I (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. i ) Nt( }-Qow 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 12 of 24 CHKLT.D=I-NOV•93 MAS['BRISPEA (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? . (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 13 of 24 ru�rr-rrv�n��pvg3 _ C. Describe any structures on the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) f.- What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) i,'wl g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? WT1aPi.i rya f i,r (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 14 of 24 CHKLT.DWI-NOV•93 MASM\SPEA • h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (STAFF. COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? ( �-ro I (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (STAFF COMMENTS) k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing -and projected land uses and plans, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 15 of 24 CHKLT.DOC11-NOV•93 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. No wz: (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: WA (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics What. is the tallest heightof any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building materials) proposed? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 24 =LT.DC01•NOV•93 MASrBR13PEA • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? 10 AP oy;" t9�u i r 'a:sr #J; a r 1 3tjc �C r. t. t P� (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ' Td J (1 t7iJ 1�� (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? i_ ) i J r, wot. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 17 of 24 CHnTMMI•NOV•93 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 4. C3.rJ O7 (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. . (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project orr applicant, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 18 of 24 CHUT.DON-NOV43 MASfER%JPEA 0 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? n (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. p (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 20 of24 CilICI.T NY11 _UAV_fri 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or neat to the site? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence- of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public .streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. �i �:.-i—; : • �''' � i t�1 1'i�' � f r',�'t�..�.i; 1� Ri ��' �s �'> �.�'r' n.j 7t.a )ti Ai.'r".�JT j'r (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 19 of 24 CHKLT.DOCiI•NOV•93 MAVERWEA f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. ,t (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures �to reduce orpcon'trol transportation impacts, if any: ` (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 21 of 24 CMT.D=I-N0Y-93 u A arv014D0 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: J-g�electrici " a^`nat�u-r�al gawrater, �refuse s_e—rvice ._phone, othe{am ary.sewers (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the 'general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to. the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. J Signature of Proponent ;61- 2 en-, ` `7 Date Submitted Page 22 of 24 CHKLTMMI-NOV-97 MAMMSPHA D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS � (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity -or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. 2. 3. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Page 23 of 24 C MTMWI-NOV•93 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?, Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Page 24 of 24 CHKLTMWI-NOV-93 MAirMR1sPPA 7 e-�-a-mac PUGET t nil r 145 H PL SW =3 14 H RMA BFrAC TH s� St z3s1, �146T PL SWt H�+STSW j �-,PL PW P PL SW N co 146THIPL 1 NORMA EAC _�� a' lal�tl S` ^ $3 sq rn 14WH Sw 148T ?a C13 ST a 1 IJTH o PL SW SW � SW 1 -�- N 1 > RD -� y 148TN - 148TH 149TH 14 SOUND 1 FISHERI'IR �31 m ��s 3 �g•.PLS NORMA BEACH RD _ T N :I 1 (E �� 149T 3 PL 5,,; P SW-ST W I 749T PL SW 151S �'3j+ PL I fs+ ?� SW 'go H PL s10 `t 150TH-:t. a 1511 S>L_SW- - - _- S I i 150TH P z 3 i_ 1515T I t r 3 > o _ S- - 1 `t1 6 ° 3 x3 3 I x F- 151ST ST SW 1 STr - ¢I 152ND ST �� SW a 1P o D a ^-- 3 T SW 't. ::.-..... r 1_.. ? N > s 152ND 152ND ? > , d �'1 :::.::........� -- 53153RD ST 3 52 < f �T I �- RDQ S1 -.. 3 I z L 1 a= e n a d PL SW v �1^1 153 o S ._r::.',_;.?i; ::: t=. ¢ a e : Project 153�2DPLSW a F 153R PL S-113 54TH Q I > �L 1 13 QI ,...._.:.:. Site ' > N > 'r�5 v I ^ a > W 3W H ST 1 Q Q Z. 1. 1a 11-56TH ^.__---_'__ - i56TH a ST SW d a 15GTH STI ° MEAD 0 7TH MEAL7QINDALE:*: , I 3 _ = 10 K RDI Sw a ] 156TH ST .o �' ..... 3 1L STH SW $ 1- f- v a :... ::.".:'.>LBEACH 'i;''F 157TH P W I I- 1 Q SW , 158T ST W t : al. PARK; SR57Tr1 PL SW a �- 15 THST 1 I 11m , "� o I PL sw3... i �� a F 0158TH PL SW I 99 i M SW, l- - a- ¢ zi J a 3 I EA ST- n I t i 160TH - ~ST - �VV -�- F �' T- - - - - - - - - - WHARF 3 3 MFgt ID 1160TH F PL SW _-...._._-! V u, SW 3T- 0 3 w - - - - - - `>'" I ,� cr ' KEELER�� I 1 O, t`L sw 1 I a 1-�- - 2 62NDN Z I = I ,na 161ST PL A Q W >p � 162ND t...IPL SW I x I V a x 1 -- 1 CORN PARK& 163R0 ST -31SW I 163RD PL S T RIDE I 1Qf 164TH I ST vI sw SW 3 Q I 3164TH_ I ST SW VY 1 I > 3, 164 H PL r,5 1 a 164TH ST SW 07 ` RO �166TH> PL S wFoo° P SI �IMARTHA 3 LAKE --•r- _.. .. �t' Q _ I .♦ 1 I M 165TH PL > m Far d°:•F:.::1;:;:;:= t ° � t6d?1 BEVERLY --• SW a �y Inati3 et�aoOHpateF I ° Z flLISW 3 1- I :'P4AYflFlOS t ¢ U IMH '- 3 0o m a 16 TH.:IST SWI v �168TH ST SW I 166TH LL S -- - -V 168TH ST SW 168TH ST SW -t EADO 11 wH I(z MfA00 DALE > t68TN S' - a PL 5w 169TH 3 ST i\ a m I I _ I ¢ s I t8 7N - - itlOTH I' = 3 �1' sI„ 170TH PL SW I 1 117 1 T PLPL= SN I .�/%%%�� F I Sw p 170TH cL ST SW ' o SW 172ND ST F( � 172 Q a Q I al¢ I sw J I' " W �a o O 1715T yD P�� ST SW - �-1 anzND ST SW 1 172ND a ST SW 3 > PE4f SW� �E, STISWri Q�, LLo . 172ND P S = Nb P SW 9 I es = I w • 173R ^ a - O 9 a173R0 ,S y / o ST 172ND `r tnNo _ I o y ST SW m 9 z SW 7 �`YsT sW 73RD I ' a 17i R PL I PL SW P 1 �I 173R Q Q 1 tT4TF1_$W a r 3 174 H ST'I s1•y SW �'PL 5W S F 3 173RD -I > T sT W t T x/ a °= m I m n175TH d I V PL SW Q PL SW y� I HI P3 1 ,� n z ST z �ii x � 175TH O 1 < d `° airy �n 1 I x;SW ~ ' N 15w STH T¢ I z y ST S r ST _ ° ut ►n �ZIL 176TH ST � 176TH SOUNn ancY. .,^ 176TH PL `I`; u 3 z i ,mns 176iH PL 5W x .,Sill ♦ is w , w 1 7 iy PL SW CC ?� ST SW �'` x LOCAUTY MAP,,3,Edmands/Mk/,�-n"vadowd(inm�t,-noN SCALE: NTS I i i zl zt ! J J' �I u� Q W . �� of r. w. - EL 300 T SPIR 290'-0•1- JI JI EL 287-0• PHASE I PHASE III _ _ _ - _ - E L 290 HOUSE _ �t vl OUTLINE w. Ot a LLJ T °" — — — — — EL 280 Lnl Ld EL 278'-6• t FUTU E REINF. CONC. {r ' — — — — - — -- — 270 RETA ING WALL I I EXISTIN 3 GRADE SHOWN == DASHE THIS REGION EL 260 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ REINF. CO WALL SEE RETAINING HT SA2.1 : F_ 25 r' FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS F t 25t'-s• - -_-_ _ - - REGION FG 250'-0 - — -r — — — — — — — — — �- — — — — — — II 3---- ----- ---- - --' - -- -- - - - 250 --_-_--- BENCH EXIST GRADE TV t --- -- - - -- -- -- -- - -- - KEY INTO NEW STRUCT- Q- __-_ FILL PER GEOTECH REgORT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -_ _- _ _ _ _ _ _ - -_ _ _ - _ - EL 240 -- - -- --- -- - --------- --- -- - -- --- -- - - - -±_i_]EL 230 SITE SECTION NOTE: HT C1.5 FOR D—D SCALE: 1 "=10' SEEESHTECIS7 FOR ROCKERYOCKERY CO ST UCTIONIONS i CRITICAL AREA AND/OR CRITICAL AREA BUFFER NOTICE Property Address: 16121 N. Meadowdale Rd. Edmonds, Washington 98026 Legal Description: Portions of Tracts 49 & 50 Meadowdale. beach, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats page 38 and Tract 50 Meadowdale Beach Supplemental Plat, recorded in Volume 5 of Plats page 42 Records of Snohomish County, Washington, and more specifically Lot 2 of short subdivision City of Edmonds File No. S-13-91 as recorded in Volume 2552, page 1536, Records of Snohomish County, Washington Assessor's Parcel Number: 5131-000-049-0103 Present Owner: Brian E. Moll P.E. S.E. NOTICE: This property contains one or more critical areas ortheir buffers as defined by Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 20.15B. The property was the subject of a development proposal for Reasonable Use Exception/Variance (type of perndt) application # V-97-91 filed on July 7 1997 Restrictions on (date) use or alteration of the critical areas or their buffers may exist due to natural conditions of the property and resulting regulations. Review of the above application has provided information on the location of the critical area(s) or critical area buffers and restrictions on their use through setback areas. A copy of the plan showing such critical area(s), buffers, and setback areas is attached hereto. Property Owner Signature: Date: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) NOTARY w' PUBLIC _ 4.4 '•• OF WASH��...� . I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �Y,I l_ rn r� ''1°'v` 6 - 1LO signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Notary's pressure seals must be smudged. Dated: - Signature of Notary Public: 0 .r, B U IL D IN 6 Residing at: " .JAN My Appointment f' Expires: C O c-r O • RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 9802040108 02/04/98 10:26 p.0005 Recorded Snohomish County COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: Cl C\ Grantor(s): (1) 21QAU E. weLL XSL (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s):_ City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 5 Twn 27 Rng 4E Qtr SW OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 5131-000-049-0103 (2 _,Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY: =7I_6 DATE: IL2 e 9 PAGE L OF S Under the review procedures 'established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: - DATE: 1$ i' PAGE -- OF ,S 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of 16121 N. Meadowdale Rd. Edmonds, Wash. 98026 (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: PORTIONS OF TRACTS 49&50 MEADOWDALE BEACH, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 38, AND TRACT 50, MEADOWDALE BEACH SUPPLEMENTAL PLAT, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 42, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY WASHINGTON, AND MORE SPECIFICALLY LOT 2 OF SHORT SUBDIVISION CITY OF EDMONDS.-FILE NO. S-13-91 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME.2552,PAGE 1536, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the.City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by; technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number ci �005-- (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: JU DATE: PAGE _ 3 OF 5- the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. I Indemnification and Hold Harmless The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against. the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or 980204 0 108 � t ' APPROVED FOR RECO ING: BY: -J46i DATE: %1H 96 PAGE OF —.— arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests "or any other person .;or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. A APPROVED FOR RECO ING: BY: .✓4 DATE: 2b/i PAGE �_ OF 5— DONE this 7 day of ,1993. OWNER(S) By: - —4—/= 12 C, �' 0 E �; CF— Brian E. Moll, PE, E By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) ss: COUNTY OF .5/r0 ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /9R/ A n( lE- 14 ") [- t_ _ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 7 day of NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: L:\TEMP\B UILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT r.: CITY OF, EDMONDS 13ARDARA FAHEY MAYOR 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH 6 EOMONDS. WA 95WO - (206) 771-0220 + FAX (2061 1ii-0221 HEARING EXAMINER $ T9 O FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF EDMONDS Applicant: Brian E. MolI, P.E., S.E. Case No. V-97-91 Location: 16121 North Met do,&dale Road (see -Exhibit A, Attachment 1). Application: -A Critical Areas `JarianceiReasonable Use Exception to allow a single-family residence to be located entirely within a critical area and to allow the driveway to be located. in the critical area and its buffer; and a Variance to allow an increase in the maximum permitted height for a single-family residence from 25-feet to 38- feet above average .grade to allow the construction of aspire and to 31-feet above average grade for the roof of. -a new single-family residence (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2 through 4). Review Process: Variance: Hear n1 Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final decision, Major Issues; a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards). b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES). c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.15B (CRITICAL AREAS ). SUMMARY OF RECOMM-E.NDA,'TIU ]Li, NS; Staff Recommendation: -7 Hctiring Examiner Deeis n: PUBLIC HEARING - After reviewing the official file which included the planning Division Staff Advisory Deport with attachments; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the application was opened at 9:06 a.m., September 18, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:30 a.m. participants at Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Slster Cities International - Hekinan, Japan eO 'd t 9 - 9 t nHI 40-2 -100 the public herring and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report_ A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division, HEARING COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public heating, From tho City: Meg Gruwelt, project Pianncr, reviewed the staff report and rccomtnendc-d approval of the, U variance for roof height and the reasonable use exception with certain conditions, and to deny the rcqucst for a ITheight variance for the tower and spire (see Exhibit A, page 2, Recommendations). From the Applicant: Brain E. Moil, applicant, stated the following: e That he would remove the arrow on top of the spire. thus reducing its height. O That the Uniform Building Code exempts spires from height measurements. • That a similar tower/spire located on a nearby residence was approved by a previous hearing examiner. The applicant submitted photos of the referenced property (Exhibit Q. From the community: Keith Van Meter, neighbor: submitted a letter dated September 13, 1997 and stated the following at the hearing: Tl�zit fie brio no issue «ith the height cif the tower st d Spire, o That he nad concerns about the slope, i.e. that since the geotechnic:al study way performed in 1994 was it still valid as to site circumstances? • That he was concerned how the project would treat the mature trees located in the slopes. That these trees contributed significantly to the neighborhood character and contributed to slope stability, Ilan Oliver, community resident,'stated that he felt the drainage plans for the applicant's project should be coordinated with the drainage plan for the project on an adjacent property (16123 N Mel dowdale Road) S0 that the systems are compatible and do not C" se irnp cts Or. lie'160 b l'ing Propkerties, From the Applicant: Brain E. Moll, applicant, stated the following: :t • That the only trees to be removed were those necessary to construct the house and that the trees on the upper slope would be retained. • That he would be consulting with project proponents on the adj ncent property under development to discuss and coordinate drainage issues. • That his consulting engineers would be submitting a letter substantiating the original geotechnical report. Staff was requested to supply the hearing examiner decision relative to spire height referenced by the applicant. 2 gp '� ZC ! C t Ui 1C_2 _100 • L FINDINGS of FACT AND CONCLUSIONS Site Description Site Development And Zoning: Facts, Size: The subject property is 23,617 Square feet gross (20,372 square feet without the access strip included), with 20.04 feet of frontage along North Mcadowdale Road lye ;exhibit A, Attachment 4). Land Usc: The 3itc is undovclopcd. Zoning: The subject property is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-20) (Noe Exhibit A, Attachment Terrain and Vcgctad ; The subject site slopes steeply down from cast to west and starts to level out in the access strip leading to North Meadowdale Road. Vegetation consi is of a stand of conifcrous'trees on the steeply sloped bank on the cast, and young alders, blackberries and grasses to the west (sre. Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Neighboring Development And Zoning: LULL "Cho property to the northwest is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-20) and is undeveloped. The property to the northeast is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-12) and is undeveloped. The properties to the south are zoned Single -Family Residential (tZS-20) and are developed with siitglt,- ramily homes. The. proixrties to the east are zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-20) and are developed with single- family homes. The pr3perly 10 the west is zoned Single -Family Residential (R.S-20) and Is being developed with a single family residence. History This parcel was created by a short sabdivision (S-13-91), ehe application for which was filed on July 12, 1991, This caused it to VeSt prior to the Critical Areas Ordinance being passed in 1992, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Viu-ianucs granted based on spacial circurrstfumos air, norinally cxcrapt from SEPA review (WAC 197- 11-800(6)(b) and F5CDC 20.15A.080). liowcvcr, ECDC Section 20.15A.280.A states that `For each environrriantally sensitive area, no exemption within WAC 197-11-800 shall be applicahle for that area." This site is lc caved within a slope cnvironmr-nt on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map, so the variance is subject to SEPA review, The npplicant submitted an Environmental Checkli,t, and staff made a Determinatiun of Nonsignificance on August 1, 1997. The deadline for appeals was September 2, 1997 and no appeals or comments ware received. Conclusion: The applicant has complier] with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act. 0 t 'd 2C ! C t n9i LC-2 —100 0 Edmonds Community ]Development Code (ECDC). Compliance Critical Areas Compliance - Variance Facts: This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15 B (Critical Areas Ordinance). The applicant has submitted a Critical Arccu Checklist £CA-93-22451 and a conditional waiver was gnantcd to the eritleal areas study requireinent. One of the requirements of the conditional waiver was to Submit a survey with steep slopes dellnea ted. Tf the survey showed that the lot would be unhuildable when ehc buffers and setbacks were cunsidered, then hie conditional waiver stated. that a Reasonable Use Exception or a V ariance must be rcccivccl before any construction not exempted can be approved. The applicant has submittcd a topographical map which shows that the steep slope critical area extends over the whole lot except for the access strip. The map also shows the applicant's proposal to modify the critical area (sec Exhibit A, Attachment 4). ECDC Section 20.15B,1601 requires that any owner of property subject to the provisions of qie 01tical Areas chapter shall record with Snokcinish County a notice of the prc.Ncnee or critical areas on the property and the Ihnitations that the Crlticai Areas chapter places on the; property. ECDC Section 20.15B.170.A allows variances from the standards of the Critical Areas chapter if the f Alowing criteria have been met-. i) $Ccause of special ciiCliiaistances applicable to the subject property, Including size, stl ape, topography, location or surroundings, or the size or nature of the critical area, the Susct application of this title would deprive the subject property owner all rossonable use of the property; and, 2) The granting of the variance is the minimum necessary to aeconiniodate the development proposal and will not be rriaterially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious, u) the property or imprommcnts in the vicinity and zone in which the property is sliva:ed, or % contrary to the goals and purposes in the referenced chapter. The applicant has addressed these criteria in his responses to the Variance`, criteria and the Reasonable Use Exception items (sca Exhibit A, Attachment 3). To suminatize, the lot was legally created for residential purposes, is oddly shaped, and the entire buildable portion is either in the steep slope critical area or its buffer. Tht topographical ninp provided by the applicant (scc Exhibit A, Attachment 4) sliows thflt the: entire sift, except for the accc9s strip and a 20-foot wide strip near dic acccs,, Lim in list steep slope hu?..uril cxe.u. _ be buffer for this area is roqu,irnd to be*50 feet. a 15-fuu! huilding setback in ud!lition, urde s u gcotochnial cnginccr dctcraii.=3 that a 10-foot buffer is adequate it`te 1,54,61n; building setback must still be alined). Allowing a variance to reduce the buffers and building sotbaeks to zoro feet would allow a building' pad only 10 foot. by 40 fc.ct, unlc:ss ,the 10•frrvt property line setbacks were also reduced. In the rniddlo of that 10 fcct by 40 font area is an oxisting well house, which is to be preserved according to the plans. C9nch>siott_t The applicant has met the first criteria for permitting a variance; hv4vc vC no variance Lo the buffer or selback requirements will be adequate to allow the construction of a house on this site. Thus, a Reasonable Use. Exception is also required. Critical Areas Compliance - Reasonable Use ]exception facts; ECDC Section 20.15B.040,C allows for clovelopment to be. allowed by the Flaring Examiner on a property when application of the Critical Areas chapter requirements wouid otherwise c1eny all 0 I i 'd £S s 51 (1H1. LG-Z -1.00. reasonable use of the property, if the devalopmcnt is consistent with the ganertl purposes of the chapter and the public intetest and after a public hearing it can be found that: i ) 'The provisions of the chapter would otherwise deny all reasona"Mr, use of the property; 2) Therc is no otl-icr reasonable use cmuristcnt with the u;tderlying zoning with less impact on the critical area or Its buffer; 3) The prali sed developra,ent dots not rase in unrewun ale threat to the public health, safety or wvlf ire on or off the property; al Any prtmiosed alteration of tho critical art:& or ita buffer is minirnizcd to the cxtcnt possihlc to Billow for reasonable. use of the property; 5) The proposed activity complies with All state, local, and federal laws including those related to scduncnt control, pollution control, floodplain rcytrictions, and on -site wastewater disposal; 6) The inability to derive reasonable economic use of the property t'i not the remelt of Actions by the "Pplicant. or a prodoces:Eur in title in scgreb ting or dividing the property and orcating the undevelopable condition nftor the effective date of iho ordinence aodirted in thim chapter, and 711 The applicant may only apply for a reasonable use exception under this subticetion if'the applicant hna also applied for a variance pursuant to ECDC 20.15B.170(A). The applicant has provided responses to each of these findings (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3). Tu sumn,ariZB, the Ink had been approved under the Falk short plar as developable for a single-hunity residence; and is still zoned and proposed to be used for that purpose. The house has been cicsi;Wd around the existing trees and to sit-in an area that had been a terraced girden. The project has been reviewed by a registered Geotechnicat Ertgineer and a registered Structural Engineer and is designed to City of Bdmonds Engineering Design standards and the Uniform Building Code. The topographical asap provided by the applicant (see Exhibit A, Attauhmom 4) Hhowq that die entire site, �,%capt for the access strip and a 20-foot wide snip near tha access, are looated within the steep slope hazard aroa (40 percent slope). The applicant also submitted a Geotechalcil Engineering Report by DODD5 {3cosciences, Inc., dated March 1, 1994, Yvith the building permit application. This report concludes tliai "the site is currently stable and will rernndn Sci during and after constrticti,_n provided the recommendations o presented in this report are adopted." A totter dated Septornhor 17, 1097 form DODDS Gooscienaes, Inc. substantiati,6 thEtt the March 1, 1994 report is still valid by indicating that there is less than a 30% chance of z slide on the subject property over the next twenty-five years. A rockery greater than three feet in height is shown to the west of the proposed house which will support the constfuction of the house. Rockeries supporting fill (rather than surl)olling a cut) taller ih=in three feet must meet setbceLs. unless a variance is obtained. The rockery iS s.hown as 2 feel tTC'T11 a11t Ccq'1.Ml s:de aeE.:al: at the Ttcr,i3 ?ll-6, and arllrii..l,aldt:!) i a,,ct f C7; lit: rCClttiTt=U „t1C setback at the south end. Thu size of the fnatprint for Phase I is approximately 925 square feet, for Pluse TT is 215 square feet, find fur Phasc III is 635 square feet, for a total of approximately 1675 square feet. Ann 19ullis, Plans Examiner, has confirmed that 1500 square feet is a fairly 4tandard footprint size in Edmonds, often with a 400 to 600 square foot garage in addition. Shc says in her review of tingle -family home plans that a 1000-sc]uare-foot size footprint is small for Edmonds, acid she rarely sees a footprint , c less than 1000 square feet in size. Conclusions: The applicant meets the first two criteria, as the critical areas chapter would deny all reasonable uue of the property if it had to be Trim and in a single-family residential zone, there is no primary use t►llowed except residential. 5 2 L ,d be ! c l nu1 T6-2 —100 The Geotechnical Engineering Report and supplemental analysis gives assurance that proposed development does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety or welfare on or oft the property if the recommendations in their report are followed. it appears that allowing a 1000 square foot footprint on the site would be a small house, kind that allowing a structure with a foorpr1m closer to 1500 square rCet would be a more standard size home, particularly In the large lot RS-; 0 Zone. Thercfore the size of home proposed is considered a reasonable use of the property. Given the shape of the property and the slope of the site, nxiving the. southwest corner of the house further west, towards the property line, would require more fill for that corner because It pulls it away ftom the slope, Moving the entire house further west and into the setbacks would stilt require disturbance or the critical area, and would move the construction closer to the neighbor to dtc west, reducing their privacy and i11CM15ing earth disturbance near them. BacauSo the property narrows towards the access strip the home cannot easily be moved to the south. The existing well hausc also prevents construction in the southern area. Therefore, the alteration of the critical arcs and its buffer, though significant, has been minhiiizcd to the Went possible to allow for reasonable use of tho property. Prior to having a building permit issued, 6e proposal will be checked to meet all state, local and federal laws, as required in criteria five, The application for the short subdivision was submitted prior to the passage of the Criti"d Area' ordinance, so it vested under before these regulations went into effect. Therefore, the sixth criterin is mct, A variance to the critical areas requirements has been applied for but will not entirely provide for reasonable use of the property. Compliance with RS-20 Zoning Standards Fact: The fundamental site development standattls pertaining to Residential development in the RS-20 zone are set forth in Chapter 16,20,030. These Include the following for. dimensions of structures: Maximum Height: 25 feet. Concluslon., The proposal complies with the requirements of the RS -20 toning standards except for the height. Compliance with Requirements for a Variance Facts: Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of the Code may be varied on a;�casc-by-case basis if the applictation of the provision would result in an unusual trod unreasonable hardship. The criteria are as follows: 1) Special Circumstances: TYtat because of special circumstances relating to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the property, strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance would deprive di-- owner of use right.% and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. Special circuinstanees should not be predicated upon any factor personal to the owner such as age or disability, extra expense which may be necessary to comply with the zollino ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to in Ike more profitable use of the property, not any factor resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of &,e same property, 2) Special Privilege; That the, Approval of the variance would not be a grant of sl=ial privilege to the property in comparison with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning. IN E 1 'd i S t S l AHI Z8-a —100 • 3) Minimum Variance: That the approved variance is dw minimum necessary to allow the owner rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with the ht:mc zoning. �l) Comprehensive Plan and Inning Or_dinanc'e: That the approval of the variance will be consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the zoning district in which the property is located. 5) Not Detrimental: That the variance, as approved cr ccmditicmally approved, will not bo significantly detrimental to the public health, salcty and welfare or incurious to the property or improvcmcnta in the vicinity and the, salnc zone. Thy opplicant has submitted declarations with their submirml which address the decisional crlierla as follows (sec Exhibit A, Attachment 3): The applicants point to the odd elongated shape of the site and the slope, which force the house to rise ve.;Iically on a very small fntatprint. The applicant feels that since church steeples are allowed above the helgtit limp, and his tower spire is basically analogous It should also be allowed to go above height Millis. The applicant states that low donsity rc�idcntial RS-20 impact is negligible. The applicant points out that the prtlPosal meets the setback and height restrictions For P..S-20 eV_ept for the tower spiiV (rind the Ioiof of the �I u.ture URt11 3). The rear of the property, the applicant states, is above the height of the tower Apire due to the slope, Therefore no views are obstructed by the proposed spire. The applicant alHo paints to the trees and brash which block all views through the property. Zia uleo feels it may add to the property value as it is an :irehiteotural design feature. The applicant states the visual impact of the spire above the height limit is small because it is a thin architectural element. He also refers to a UBC 1994 excerpt on height restriction exetptions. The ECDC Section 21.40.030 defines the height of a structure us being inewwrod to the highest point of the structure, excluding only church steeples, elevator penthouses, ehimnoyc, vent pipes, and standpipes. Coviclusiont: As to the variance criteria the following conclusions shall apply: 1) SPECIAL CIFCC TIST,WCES: The suhjecz ir:t has an exlrem1 Iy unusual sisal e and is 1=ale(I entirely ill % re�ldlaied sl'J o. DC t.1 Mc n f er. rra i l.+ r ( slopes on file - .� . p 7,.tG11�1<i� 5..„Silt . :l,., J, tilt. steep )' site, it is reasonable from a public safety standpoint to construct the house in the area of (cast grade near the access strip. The steep slop' conditions support a nlinimtuu variance to allow the roof proper, which is a necessary structural clement, to exceed the 25' height lirrtil by 6'. However, these same conditions do not support the request for a purely arci,itecturai rCftttll'e (1,e, the spire) to exceed the underlying height limit. 2) S11tCucLrRrvuao&: Currently the only items alloyed above the 25-foot roquired height for rcridencea are chimnays, vent pipes, and standpipes, fie allowing the spire above the requirad height wnuld be a special privilege compared to othor proporlies in the vicinity. 'the applicant's contention that it is analogous to a church utccple and, thus, should be allowed ignores the fact that the height axception for steeples (spires) is ba:.od on such features being a normal appurtenance to a church, i.e. a different vw, The exalupls supplied by the applicant of a nearby' residence being allowed a similar spire is not compelling, first, tic height requested for that spire is less than what is being requested by the applicant, Second, the spire 7 b l 'd 99 : 91 AHI L8—Z —100' • 0 is tl purely architectural feature unrelated to unclosed, habitable apsoo Lind is a design alemant prodieated by actions of the applicant. The proposed house., is restricted by the steep slope, so the granting of the roof to go 6' above the allowed height because of the restrictions on the buildable area would not be a special privitcte. 3) MINIMUM VARIANCE: The height proposed for the roof of ilia house anpuara to be the minimum variance necesFary in order to construct a reasonable residencc under the lopugraphieal and hydrological cireuniNtancer, of the site. Tire additional height roquestod for the spire does not constitute i minimum variance since the house can be designed and constructed without that feature and not lose any other of the functional or design aspects of tI1e overall project. I do not agree with the conclusion by the hearing examiner on the example cited by tale applicant as to that spire being the minimum necessary for the project. The hearing examiner in that case failed to view the minimum necessary criteria in the context of the project as a whole, but instead isolated his review to the spire spccitically' i,e: the msidence in tbat example s:cuid have been developer] without violating the height Iiltlit mid without c:uritprorhising the development objec►ives of tiie overall pro jecl. 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4 D ZGNAiC ORDLUANcv: Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued development of the site in a manner consistcnt .vith the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation and policies. 5) NOT bfTitIMENTAL: Because of the steep slope, the house will be below the hurries to the cost of it, so the impact on those properties will he small. The he)ufie will be quite visible to the neighbors to the; south and west, but will not ba in their viewshcds. Allowing the house to go higher Instead of the f a: her laitrudln# into the steep slope wtll make the project. lc:.. leldnicnial to the area noel immediately adjacent.properties. Technical Committee Revleiv by City Departments Fact; The varianct application liar. been reviewed and evaluated by tho Piro Departmant, Pulhlic Works Divieinn; Engineering Divisioii,,and the Pzrks and Recreation Division. The only sab.tantiva comments received were from the Engineering Division, and these cornm.ents are inc':uded as Attachment 5. Conclusion: The applicant will need to comply with the terms of any future permits, its required by the Engineering Division. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC) Comprehensive Platy Designation Fact: The subject property is deeignated as "Single Family Residential." Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site. Comprehensive Platt Goals and Policies Facts: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals and policies; which relate to "Rcsi&ntizll ]Development" in the City. Specific goals and policies are discussed in detail below. g, ,d OG:0t 1141.E 16-2 -100 s- u section B states as a goal of the City that: "High quality residential development winch is appropriaic to the diverse lifestyle of B(Inaords residents should be maintained and prom stud...... Policy B.I. states: "Encourage those building custom homes to design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to hartttonize with tho surroundings, adding to the community idelttity and desirability." Pulicy B 3, -Antos. 'Minimize encrowlinient on view of existing homes b7 nuw cunstructinn nr tidditiuris to existing ytructuro-." Page 31, subsection 13.5.0 states, "Stable property values must not be threatened by view, traflic, or land use. cncrt)achrncnN_„ Conclusiun: The design of the proposed house. is compatible with survounding dcvcluprront. however, the towcrhipirc eddy n dm: ,gn cicmont that is now to the invncdiatc ncighborlicod. Buv auw Dr At4 ;lolac of the. lot, imrncLq on views will be miiiinllzod. DvelSION Bused upor. the foregoing findings and Conclusions, the following decisions arc rendered: A. DENIAL of the. requested variance for the spire. 13. APPROVAL of the 6-foot variance for the roof and the Reasonable Use Exception with the following conditions: 1, The height of the residence, including the tower, shall be no taller than 31 feet above avcrrlgc grade, as shown in the building elevations and on the site plan height Calculations its depicted In Exhibit A, Attachments 3 and 4. 2. The applicant must obtain a building pert»it prier to any eonytruction, 3. The applicant will need to comply with all the terms of any future peF.Mits. 4. The permit should be transferable. 5. The applicant shall record with the Snohomish County Auditors office a notice, in a fora] acceptable to the City Attorney, that thf, entire property is located within a steep slope Critical Area or buffer and paint out the limitations the Critit_tl Areas Qrdinance Places on the property. and shall provide a copy of that, notice (with a reoording number or with the appropriate fees so the city can record it) to the Planning Division. ti. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineering Report by DODDS Geosciences.Ine., dated March 1., 1994, 7. The applicant shall ensure that the proposed development complies with all state, local, and federal laws including those related to sediment control, pollution control, floodplain 'restrictions, and on -site wastewater disposal. R. The applicant, shall retain the significant trees and other mature vegetation in the upper slope areas of his property and will limit tree removal to the minimum necessary for development of the residence. 0 91 'd 1.S l S l 11HI Z6-2 -100 0 9, The applicant shall coordinated on and off site drainage control measures with the project being developed on the adjacent property tit 16123 North Meadowdale Road. Entered this 2nd day of October, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner Linder Chapter 20.100 of the Cnmrnunity Development Code, of the City of Edmond,- o d d B . Larg Hearing Emu-niner RECONSIDEtRATI+ON'S AND APPEALS The followin- is a summary of the dt adl-Mes and procedures for filing reconsideratioTi.'s and appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recotnmendation or appeal should contact the PIanning Department for further procedural information. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010,E allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or recommendation if a written rcqucst is filed within tcn (10) working days of the date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any pewn holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the sutoject of such decision or irecommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of application being reviewed. Appeak Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be rnade in writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project applicant and the ditc of the decision, the name and address of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the decision being appealed, LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.85.020.0 states "The approved variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be chill and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration and the city approves the application." RE i 1 'd 19 : 9I 0141 16-2 -1.00 NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing ]Examiner request a change in the valuation of thie property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office. EXHI]31T: The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record, A. Planning Division Advisory Report 8, Letter from Keith Van Meter, September 13, 1997 C. photographs of Case No- V-29-90 D. Later from DODDS Gcvscicnccs, July 19, 1997 E. Hearing Exarraner decision for V-29-90 (Spiro, 15631 75th PI. t�; ,) F. Fetter from DODDS Oeosciences, September 17, 1997 4 PARTIES of RECORD; Brian B. Moll 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmonds, WA 98026 Keith Van MMeter 161 15 North Meadowdal.e Road Edinonds, WA 98026 Edmonds Planning Division Edmonds Engineering Division. Dan Oliver 15926 70th Avcnuc Wcst Edmonds, WA 98926 99 ; 91 nH i is-2 -ino 01/20/08 08:14 FAR 208 487 8441 WJA Plan Cheek # 97 191 • Date: 3 October 1997 Frolcct Nano/Address: Moll xestdcnce I6121 N. Mc#kW&k Rd. Contact FerSonf Address: Brian E. Moll PE,SE 10115 Hn� Dr#D202 Everett, WA 98204 Reference: Flax RMrW CormMons per Jamal of Engineering Deyt. To: Jim Walker, City Engineer Deary1m, please consider my request for it driveway Skye of 20% & to the toyograyhy of my site. The slit fads in a steey slue =a, which has also rrWed me to Bet a reason6use variance. (See Attaekvents) stneerely, Br�trt E. Mo1I PE,SE SZR�`ET F11 4c /22� `7g Vjac Ver �or -5- le -I-s 2 0 ono mil° p rd v e a( fa 003 N Plan check # 97-191 • �� ^� Date: 27 June 1997 r_ -, S U I L D I N 6 Project Name/Address: Moll Residence 16121 N. Meadowdale Rd. Y� Contact PersonlAddress: Brian E. Moll PE,SE 10115 Holly Dr #D102 Everett, WA 98204 J u N 3 0 1997 Reference: Engineering Dept Comments dated 20 June 1997- attached Response to Engineering comments Response to item 1: The house was designed to beyhased, see 1st sheet of civil Eng calcs. Allyhases are shown on sht C1.2 and sht c1.4. The driveway is shown on sht C1.2. I felt it wasyrudent to design the drainage for the antutyated future impervious area when all yhases are comylete. Response to item 2: The Geotechnical Engineer of Record isyresently reviewing myylans, we are to meet next week to finalize the erosion control ylan. That ylan will be forwarded onto the city ASAP. Response to item 3: The width of the driveway is shown on the transverse section detail 2/C1.5, the slope is shown on the Driveway longitudinal section E-E/C1.5. The slope is 2% from Sta 00 to Sta 1+00, it is 12% from Sta 1+00 to Sta 2+00, and it rises to 330 /o for the remaining 20'. _ Response to item 4: A SEPA Sincerely 'T Brian E. Moll P.E., S.E. YA V4- b VVt0, - A Plan Check #: 97-191 City of Edmonds Plan Review Corrections Date: June 20, 1997 Project Name/Address: 16121 - N MEADOWDALE ROAD Contact Person/Address: Brian Moll 10115 Holly Dr. #D102 Everett WA 98204 Reviewer: Jamal Department: Engineering In order to complete your construction permit application, the following should be submitted to the permit coordinator (please submit three copies of each): 1 Provide a plan Showing the impervious area. Your calculation shows 4990 SF of impervious area, how did you come up with this number? 2 Provide a plan for erosion control only. 3 What is the width, slope of the proposed driveway? Please submit driveway cross-section. 4 Please submit SEPA list. The amount of cut is more than 500 CY, therefore SERA checklist is required. Please see the attached SEPA checklist submits requirements. DATE FAXED (Attach fax transmittal) PAGE __L OF • • i �Yi J2 w19:5 ��x �o n� '� 2 D y ,-,j a`),ec-f to4. STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA 0w+0�0 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+59t 1+75 2+00 FI �IW 3 I I I I I I I I I I rt� 1.1 I I EXISTING GRADE DASHED SHOWN I �I v 2 ;NISHED GRADE THIS REGION ~I SHOWN 1S01-II; THIS REGION I I Ia. I Ld z I I �\v� �: I I ?I a) TOWARD I I i I I I I IHousE I_ _ ' EL 240 zl 11'-7"t -D" 45'-0" SCARIFY 1 & RECOMPACT �n�j ! — _ - _ 1 C1.6 RIM EL=226.3t I ®95� MAC DF.Y DENSITY I ADD STRUaT FLL FOR y5\ui _ _._ _. -. _ - _. ..... _. I -C1.6 I RIM EL =2L69t I I MIN. COVE I AE.V INVERT - - -•- _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ EL 230 _. ._._._.-._._._._._ A E i 8:12 _ .—._ _ _._. _ _ _._ _ - - -'- -'- -'- - -'----- �.-'._._.- -� �} :t2------ - - - i -'-'-' - - - - I.E. = 2 .5 22b IOR_SD INVERT 2is.os . 1-E.=219:�5' �. .-'- --'-'-'-'-'-' -' 19.6t '-----•-'-'-'-'-'-' - - '- -'-' -' ®,CTRL,OU_ET .---_-------- - _. _:_:_ _ - ---- ----Q=C.9-INLET -- ----- --.-- ---------------- ---- — -- -- - __ - 4 DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E—E FILENAME: ORLONGIT.DWG DWG. SCALE: 1"=W ® STORM DRAIN' 20 'Cl •G APPROX. SS 1 STA 0�+0�0 STA _ 0+25 STA 0+50 STA 0+75 STA 1+00 STA STA STA 1+I25 1+50 1+63t STA 1+75 STA 2+00 � Flo a Ali' E 3 uj I I I 1 I I I EXISTING GRADE w� I I I PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE �2EGION I I SHOWN DASHED THIS REGION >1) SHOWN SOLID THIS QI F z I I I I I I H J �a I I I I i SCAVFY 12" & RECOMPACT uiI ZI I o I I I ® 91M MAX DRY DENSITY I I TOyVAR I _ _ _ _ - - - EL 240 a ADD STRUCT FILL FOR - I MIN (COVER OVER INVERT U ( I I - - - _ _ _ - — — — — —. .! . ._._. - - —.— EL 230 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SLOPE 1 2[_._ - - - -'_.- - - - - - - - - - _._._ - - - - - - - _ - - 4 -•- - --- - - -- - - - -- - - - - - ........... ---------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - --- __.QSL1��i3t_. - ._ - - - - - - - - - _3,�s ------------------------ —--— --—-- I -- — ------- k--—— ——————;----------- ------ --—-------- — — — — — — ---- --- — — -- -- EL 210 DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E—E ® SANITARY -;EWER FILENAME: NUDRLONG.DWG' DWG. SCALE: 1"=� cl 5 '++ id,1774 nb:4a �asaei�6ai DODDS GEOSCIENCES PAGE @I post Offlce &V 4385 K/rlt18nd, WA 98083 Telephone (4g5) 827-1084 FaCs/n7ile (74525) 828-9443 Brian Mull do WJA Job Number 4008 1218 Third Avenue, Suite 30b September 17, 1997 Seattle, Washington 98101 Subject: Addendum 91 — Plan Review Propoaod Moll Residence 16121 N. Mesdowdale Road Edmonds, Washington Den' Client: In accordance with the requirements of the City of Edmonds, further analyses Were conducted by our firm, The purpose of our additional work was tc fulfill the citv's requirements regarding analysis of possible landslides over the next 25 year period, Our analyses indicate there is lass than a thirty percent (.30%) probability of a landslide on this property over the next 25 years. The proposed on -site improvements increase the stability of the site by providing slope reinforcement via walls and controlled drainage. In our judgment the plans and spccification prepared by the structural engineer conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report and the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the report. The proposed development does not increase the potential for slope movement. Please contact me directly- if there are any -questions. Thank You: DODDS Geoaciencss Inc. Ile r s �1 I /18/1997 13:58 2068818641 IBL— Post ONSee Boor 2385 Kirkland, WA 98083 Telephone (425) 847--1084 F91C5lmlle (425) 828-9443 DODDS GECSCIENCES Brian E. Moll, P.E. 10115 Holly Drive, #D 102 Everett, WA 98204 Subject: Plan Review Proposed Moll Suim�gg11e-Family Residence 16121 North Meadowdale Road Edmnds, Washington Reference: Plans and Cross -Sections by Brian Moll, P.E. Dear Mr. Moll: J U N 21 1997 PAGE 01 Job Number 4008 July is, 1997 In accordance with your request, the undersigned engineer reviewed the above material. The purpose of this review was to assess suitability of the project for development in accordance with City of Edmonds requirements. We recommend that the two relatively -close rockeries proposed for the slope near the northwest corner of Phase III be replaced with one large rockery constructed entirely of minimum six -men rock. It is our opinion that the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in the geotachnical report, and after the one correction mentioned above is oorupleted: the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties from soil ratability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in the report, The proposed development wlH not increase the potential for soil movement. Please contact the undersigned directly at (425) 827-1084 if there are any questions. Sincerely: DODDS deoscienees Inc. MKD/wd x -,`) s T T . ' - r. :.i tg�rc•+�4 "Z. •� c^rtt r t .?9—.',;." 4f1 .i^;' 1 t 5 ° .,� y +'�,�` rr .'t4x1 y t r25_ _, a tie -..�,.I. -I:, ..I �'.-., , II.. ."E0 .,'-,-_, .�I1"'*., ,I -, * , .*�� ,,.:'. 9 :� _� .,z�...C1.1k.`--.. _ *.-�.."�, ... 7.- 1-:_i-'j . � ,IL,,,, -,� .'---, . _.13'" I1 ,,�.�.". :... 1 -1-.11._.�, ,," -.. ,.-�.I.. �1,I-- =�...IIN, ,- ,I ,,f1. ., ';1.,�- �1!-.�.I -�,.1.1.6...7.'._.�",1._I��,'I-:".'-.:�I1.f-'I,,, ,,,�,I�.., ,,. ,�- ,�, 1,. .II I - ,.Ki�'I . ,.� 't.I.-;"C .- ."I.,: .., .�1, I...,. .:_1,,�, 'I , ".""-1.,:..l I . - 5. 1,.,:-�_:-. . I�,�t. t, ',', I_. ,, , "I .,:i,-. . ,1�--�_1 ,.,e:.,— I� � ", , , :; _:��I ..,I...,,I�I"".,'�.;,:_-,. :",� �._,, 'I"�7....I'I ;- , . , .-;,__ "'I -�,, I-��,�,.:,.. 1 .�%... .-,-F� l4 .I I: I. ,,- �.i_. �;, I..Z�1.JII �E. E,-,14, I-�,I,I.. . �,'. ,. . .,I r :_'-., �—...�: :;,�.SJI� �,.-.-,n . - I - . -..�.,"-,l,`I1-* .I,-,-- -_ II- , .�. 1��, . :. ,, �I 1:! .. .�,,.-,�.� II.,"_-._.__.—'._-�I�,��-,.L- * - ,, -, I - " " .I , I.Z,.",, ,-,*�1I ',:' .%I- - _*.I ".;':',- ,'�.--1� -,,-,. 1,-.-..1p",... � '- ,. ,2-"1 .'1,�4 I'�.., "-I ,. _:-_�i.,". .�.;. �. ..N_ :-::.1-. _I_;- ,.I 1.. .._1,I ��.,..'.1-�__ 1I. 1�'. I-:,I�,,, � .I.- . .!;I )""-,I..,1, .1, �,�::—:.t"j,', . � ,-.1'1_*.0,, ,A,-. - , `._ .�4I-.I' , .'_-. r.. -19.- � 4�.'-I,.,.f3�i!:.�_t-.,_'�..�I .,I .- . ,._�,. '`-1 , � :'., .-I- _4' .�_*,,I1�* 11 �--,,-_ - t:,. � .i,.-�*"-.�,n_, .1!,'I. ,_1..,�'.:1.1 �"-1:-I "� ,.fI.,I,I"._,,' I�-. ,';..1. .— I- ;iI`,, ,.1" 'I 1, �,-'.'��.'t1__ " ..:-�.. - ._I--', ��_, �1��_i-.,1.1-. 1-1 .�_,I.%1 ,-, .,*.,* .�' *- l - '>I Y,_1 :.�,: �.", �,'�_.,'.: - -. .�-�."., ,i__,�.'-I, O..— ,,��_t'...�,'�,,�.-._j,.,.-4.."�.',"1�,:'�:�_-- _ / ,S'I,,.',.. �4_ I ..**,I'.,_�, ".�,"e�..2� :_.I,.. .-"I , �..-:: . ..I.,,��.2 -.-,.�,.��..-�.,J �,— -'1"."��.-I,"..:.,,��",,�_._%;-i-.�'*',.�1-I.,V�, ,--,1--.�: i.:�,.;:.2'.",,-_,,If,...,,. .._.,1,.:, �� . ,,�.. . -_;, ,9,;.. —,I � -�?.��,.,-,. .11�.I . �,,_. .e.,'- 1.,:�,,..,� ..._.;." -:..... I"1"1'1,.I%,' .1 "�I;,.,�I- ��,,. I ,,-� �'��, ,." ."';:� I"11 ,I�1 ,!�J��,;m.I-1�_.-;,I1.�O-;..�.".�1'4�,�.'-�.,.I �. 1 zz� Z.,.'.,�""-:,t,.. w.. .*.,, L1-,1� �,-._,' ':I.- ..�-.,�I ,1-,�- .I� U";,_..,.,,wtI�.1"�.�I1',. _..,:I. ,,'I, ,,. :.j: 1 ',.-. ""V X. II ", , ,�1,7_.:,, ".,'.'-�:,—, ,. � . ,.-,.��1" I , T �.1.: , � �,.�,1.".I ",.- , , . 4, ...,-, .-,:.;..1i. :: t- r r r f ,t t f 2'.a r -:.y _ , J_ ty, t�tr t){ � •Jh i Y r F�Ut' i lr Y • A •tiiT t Y', a 1 '� t - z, f i y<` °.v V, 1 . s v. z., kt t' 4'k . �'+.•, c_,t *' A.% M.- Y 4ir- Y_tJ v5°h P r•fit - . ...-. ! ,t !. . ° USE s z `, rw CITY OF) EDM 1 DS %�° NUMBER b r t ZONE :s! n i 1. '(9 �1•,ry 2. CONSTRUCTION' PERMIT'APPLICATION roe [ k r{ '''' _ty' OWNER NAMEJNAME OF„BUSINESS d,,,;s ? t�i _'+' 41 t .0 4 ADDRESS /,,,f" 7 `� S a ' r� 4'rI J P - .: i3rzi E Nlo�� L E a'} , , L¢ LEGAL OESCRIPTIO kC- E, K SUBOIVISION?NO ,q LID{NON 'S •'. * h , w4 w MAILING(Ag7DDRESS' �;'(�w ;.y -)` °- 'r :i /�M�!• ?t/'')�_'r$7' �''' r '�(C )`'z y .J 'ii �' 't. O { - 71 oI l S " OI✓ ...1-'t\4 A� rbr' .I V �a _ f I t ir^ . f� . ' eie�q, '%,! + t�, � _: ,'; 4 ' I.PUBLIC„rRIGHT OF WAY PER-OFFICIALS�h`, , 4' , fESCPApprtSvdd z .: gip CITY j ZIP,TELEPHONENUMBER si ,, o s + y tI E�/�/ )' S. - n EXISTING O - EOUIREDDEDICATIaN -RWtPe .ot Rsequved 4 ''p 4ti.d �ie Y " / 1` Street Use Permtt ReQ d '❑ T W l) InspecGOn;�egUuer�" J , .� NAME ' ; _, y, PgOPOSED�. - .d..- t (� v J "(` ko - �' _ .....t ! tii.l• §Idewalk Requtred „itl :'. } ~-SE)t •„�� Y' T .3 s a+a 'METE S V�` i ? LI 2E NO;OF F XTURES '! PRV REOUIREO t w ADDRESS I,- e r r >3 i s b !2 �y%r , t I; t i 1- _4 •L d E" ; tf s"r t t .t e: .,, � t. t .ti n + .Y NO ❑ � 3 _: Pr t: _ - .,j l r '! -r t . ` REMARKS. , - -�+ ! .� a.: _,nit c ,v d �;. G.. i ti t 1 %)1 ..,.' ' 1 •` e ' ,--mac' 'r F J Z Q CITY t -`(•, ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER t - ct :� _ t.VV vVLD!': r f • ,t'1ws£�72 ) W ' i NAME `•. (/�) r' ,'` �+ o ' �; t i' J� /� ,g ( .. Dti'1 �' ti (I dJ l Jr Ol. VO W i { . `/ � 1�-�+1�- � 6 t C / I r, " 1 : J )) � . u ¢ wit �, yT l t.. a ' t ¢ ADDRESS - - W �/�✓, �1/.rl�7l►�1��f kp ,. . V..., r ,.. !x, EN RING M AT ED v v ?S + Tb Ya ,,, - r _. r:a FR ' t O .. ..r , .• a„J ' i .a �� _ i%% ,�m+..vf a .1= „� _ t �.},� , 1 6VIEWED;BV & i' Q CITY ,21P TELEPHONENUMBER J irsp �(/' °t: tr ,,.,.i..s° h '.I "" r Z ..' �, t. 'i i .+f MEM l O .. ... r - i .),.,. "� )FIRE i A� {�f4TED rir'•' r-,/r �, "teT.� r. t._St 1,r. �'a t Y EV ( �`, R IEWED BY 1.1 1. U STATE LICENSE NUMBER " X EXPIRATIONS ATE/ {w r ; , Q r a �� i `'' y sMriS`a tr ). 2 LL r rx i VARIANCEOR CU7 IT ti s ' , tADB ll° Ti SHORELINE Y! 'Legal.Description of. Rroperty ,'Include all easements, +4'r c'V 7 )` ' I . - ,_',"t :t t ; r` x r¢ ly�< t SEPA REVIEW. pa SIGN AREA:di } t)' F HEIGHT I. i C) ` _g G ;COMPLETE El(EMPIT{ ALLOWED ;PROPOSED . ;ALLOWED PROPOSED ;DNS t rcx r. r t� ti 4vY / / a %. I r ►r <or ' s v 1 ""��i t eta � l 1 3! t' i li - .EXP /( "e ti't, as .'tG y.f i°tip t� Y { .f N I,; LOT COVERAGE" ( REOUIRED}5F�7BACKS (FT) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT) o ALLOWED, PROPOSED `e '` •FRONTti. SIDE1?REARi�) g�F(RONTi L%R SIDE REAR C, Pro ert 2 '� �✓ sr F A/ ,zk a�jprMj4nY,"J rt `�11t1 25"1 i2X1 z .. L 3:f t `1, "' �35' a + 77' Z �.:.l�.,.,: , :,'�_.:�..r, '., ,,9.�; '.,"1-, I,- -".,.�.�- .�,,I._--.,.;_."...,,..1.� ...�,'.. , . I.. _.� '�.;J*-._,. 4-,,,� ,.i", �- ��".-�. `.�`�,_12f-O. -.. ,',�i'2'- .,4_..�.;�I:�y " ,. � .':"_.4.4.._;1�I-;� ,�Z-., :_�;j�_".1' �._.�.:% ��I.5�'r.`'-"I .,� .. ..-., ;;�_-O1�-y_1r""C,��J1,,..-,-.�!�*,,W- ,".0� "7- - `-,I�".__ ,',. ,7_ '.---i, 7...,-.,,, -._1.e.,,.-.- ' : I, i�_I, I_�-. �'. 1* ',,-:�,. ",��-I '1,,c"I .j-_I".�.9�_, .7.,,_-',-"1,11-_�-�1._".;�, ,I.,.. "fI�f", '- .,�`,, .-,%'..-l.I;!-�,. —'I.'I1 I'. , ..I - ",;-i,,�1 .....,j"..�,i��;_,_.,,. ^_--r��''- ,i".".II - 1-- . I.'-'i;. , '-.I_ ".�, ,: ,4' ,_�_-,.. , ,1_ ., __ -' :I 11 _,". -,�-, I 4I,"..��,..--'..�,. ,.'1..�-t,_:�' ,..�r,; ' ,,.' TaxAccouOE /] //�)it r LOT AREA :pl PLANNiNGREVIEWBYM rt DATE a Parcel No ' ✓' �! l Df4o r g 1 a x 2 s r.Ir��J�I �r ,' REPAR S2. Lr - rRaraa ?. a NEW RESIDENTIAL i PI,UMBINGIAAECH. r t 14r di f x,ut t I w, •: , , �i 1 f � ` ±: dti; c d COMPLIANCE -OR ,� "' �'s j t' '+•` °"' a ('; Si •y�x,�i4 r ` ADDITION' COMMERCIAL r CHANGEOFUSE �Cd1.� .'sl/,!I�.!!, u'` n -. I,, „ . y y „ 2A ar „/� r APT BLDG ^"4 -, :Sdt �CT..%Y!.. ✓�r , ,__ _ . > REMODEL ❑ ESIGN j!� 6R DING u �' CKED BY TYPE OFCONSTRUCTIO a " COD OCCU �QJ FFyNCE ,�j/% } .-REPAIR CVDS 1 1 GRO CHE e . s. .. Y �. ,r l _ WOODSTOVE a r. SWIWP 1'+' a DEMOLISH ° H0T T 8 SBA SPECIAL INSPECT R"' aTL r - i ` INSERTN _ •REOUIREDI Q 7V - ` OCCUPANT,'- .: Z : LOAD GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ , J. .r ti / VES ^, r " Z ;CARPOR7rC c t a ROCKERY RENEWAL REMARKS ) y(TYPE,O�.L SE USINESS OR ACT/hV,I+TY) EXPLAIN r, PROGRESS INSPECTIONS1 PER�UBaC 108,; § o ¢ 1 ..'f%` S �f r f- y rP i I i.A ., W s':1,fd Y.A'�,'?, k I #wdl'i} t ? s ;y�?., m NUMBER NUMBER OF 'CRITIC Y ' T%]r K/'yi/� �•� ,9S `/�A(� 6 hjs`GG t m O OF r t 'DWELLING V AREAS - a 4-•fr-..c !;J , ..;iSW �' fu(^t?t! t' +` m STORIES _ . y` UNITS. •' NUMBER y.s,; - h DESCRIBE W T BE• ONE (ATTA ,P A!lUtTu9!9c'S MOIL !°El# h �" aj ' J - LB� . i' - 1 + / h i j .. , r:t N 3'p p"eYY6" + f ti> �� z ;FINAL'INSPECTION REQUIRED A "r .r<:r � .�, �. ", . � s . SHOP ==9Q o b.. p ` , � "` - •p:.,>x-• VALUATION - +',:aFEE tjj.. t r: p . �-.0 ;�,-.� 11 j -t - ,y. q'r t /Q /�] / _ ! , ;1 , .. t PLAN CHECK FEE 1 s7 r, (Ctt at 2 t4 , G l ";, d �j J Y tea, BUILDING ..t '` s 'iM- °}+r . ` t. '+" Y r flee HEAT URCE: 7 o-� / Y r GLAZING 3 12 �' .s r w# % PLUMBING �+ & y y ; CX$ ti G# �¢' - $ ,tia i c _ Plan Check. N.o( , , f MECHANICAL � ? } *� /� y t ' , ..,, u.._ _ .. E. ,�: Sea aD+ � 1 '•' 1 ( This Permit covers work to be'done on private property ONLY GRADINGIFILL �" f,� a 5 ,r ''Any construction onthe. public'domain-icurhs;-sidewalks; 4 - 4 . r ..driveways' marqueesi,etc.) will require separate permisstbn. sr. suaCHARGe ?5 Permit Application: 180 Dayar - c ; i $, 3 Y } 1 ' " ' 'STORM DRAINAGE FEE "') !3 S Rs•rI W )k +- i . .... .: _ ... , Permit Limit:1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days .. t, O . ' "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spous heirs assigns and ENG INSPECTION FEE r ,� ,,, , s,r ,.e , 3 to successors in Interest" agrees to indemfii�. zdefend and fi Id J harmless the City of Edmond§, 'WasFiington its offhJals "' )� t "' f t • ( :.employees, and agents.from.any.and all: claims for'darrfages`of ' .', a whatever nature, aeismg,direcily or, indirectiy.from,ttielssuance - , _ 'of•.this permit. Issuance.of"this permit shallnot,be"deemed'to PIgNCHECK,DEPOSIT L i o modify; waive or reduce any,requirementof`any.city ordinance t °x `norTlimit;in any way.the City's ability to enforce,anyordmance I ) p +' ' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE . 'w�j-,.r .provision. I tflIf i it: ' ) hereby acknowledge.that (have:read this application that'the '• T" t , ; a Information given is .correct, and that Lam ttie owner,br the duly ATTErvYION : APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of"the owner 1 agree to comply, with city.and i,. , t ' F .THIS PERMIT i -;, {' estate laws regulating,construction anii.in.doing;thework authoriz AUTIioRlzes This application its nova„permit unfit L f 'ed thereby; no,person will.be•erriployed in,violatiori,of'.the Labor ONLY THE signed by the• ui ing;Ofticiai,or;h` : ei si: Gode'of the State of`Washin ton relatin to.Workmen?s Com :ensa WORK NOTED De ut and fees are. aid and ravel t is i g 9 P _ P Y; , ,P P tion Insurance and RCW�1&27: acknowledged in space^provided. t s INSPECTION' SIGNATURE"(OWNER OR -AGENT) •: DATE SIGNED x" :: `,, "� - • z' �.'�-� - 1..V",,1,�.�.1 �5,',--V�i. '_ .. C �:-. _ 16 _ _DEPARTMENT t i t be'4" . 7J:9�lq,t a/iJ/ <j /�,a P1CITY OF OFFICI SI RE , TE j itti�rirlJ (J[� Jr,' EDMONDS Qf (� 'ATT. NTION .I. ca -- FOR t REL V x A + INSPECTION ` } t 'iv - ,,,�j7`, - . 1 .-,i �.�.,-, � ..,!.�-,,,4,IT IS UNLAWFUL TO,.USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR:'STRUCTURE, UNTIL .A _FINAL; INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE 'AND APPROVAL' OR 77'� 0 20 2 ORIGINAL I File YELLOW Inspector A ' :CERTIFICATE OF _OCCUPANCY 'HAS BEEN GRANTED:.'UBC I DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E-E ® STORM DRAIN i 240 230 Z26 220 210 FILENAME: DRLONCIT.DWG DWG. SCALE: 1"=W 20 1 N, Rva �0-,-)L-�t I-\ I I I CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES: i `r f titi o _ 2 ' f0� sus JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPT. DESIGN STANDARDS i /J%A/ 0 z W /1oP_ naasy \ � D 2 IIN1V 5 72Qi9 \ 1 SS IE=245.5 ` g \ o O HOUSE I \ \ 1 SS IE=240.5 . \ O ROCKERY j 1 \ !SD IE=240.5 30-0 ASPHALT COATED CMP DETENTION PIPE - CONTROL STRUCTURE C8 TYPE 11, 48"0 MWIT \ SD SS � `7\�-24"0 HALF f4pUND \ `\ CMP CULVERT`, IN \ / 4'-0' WIDE CONC CAP 'w P ' v 1\ i \ \\ 1 N \ I \ 1 ; WV`2329 \ ;0 \ X S>bf p \ • - 4��Tr0r \' - e � � 'ty L_ `{t`7• 'Q�-7\M.INV_227.a1 \' I ' 1 L — — — — — — — — — — — 17-SANITARY 4DCSEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6 DIA. PVC . INSTALL SANITARY SEWER AND TIGHTLINE — — — — — — — — I WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING ISTANOARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1X PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS 1 INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 2. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6'DIA. PVC (ASTM D3034 MIN) . INSTALL STORM SEWER AND ' TIGHTUNE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF td EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1x PROVIDE CLEANOUTS 0 AS INDICATEDION THE DWGS. 3. STENCIL CATCIF, BASIN UO WITH ' DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO SOUND' ( 1/2' MIN LETTER SIZE) \ 4. INSTALL WATER SERVICE CONN AT STREET, WATER METER. & WATERLINE TIGHTLINE ALL CONNECTIONS IN TH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. i 5. EMBED CLEANOUT CAP IN 16' X16' X12' CONRETE PAD ' 6. VISUAL INSPECnON OF UTILITY TRENCHES & TIGHTLINES REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS 1 PRIOR TO BACKFIII OPERATIONS. 1 7. BACKFILL MATERIA'_ & COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DESIGN SIDS. \ 8. FILLS PLACED ON SLOPES SHOULD BE TERRACED(BENCHED) AND KEYED INTO THE SLOPE. THE \ BENCHES SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE SLIPPING OF THE FILL DOWN THE HILLSIDE AT '1 THE INTERFACE OF THE EXISTING SOIL AND THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FILL. \ 9. CATCH BASINS' SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 (AASHTO M199) AND ASTM C890 UNO: \� o. HAND HOLDS IN PRECAST EXTENSION RINGS SHALL HAVE 3- MIN CLEARANCE, STEPS OR LADDERS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6' MIN CLEARANCE. b. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED e. PRECAST BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2' MIN. LE BEACH OU OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL WALL THICKNESS. MAX HOLE SIZE FOR 48' DIA CATCH BASIN 1$ 36'. MIN CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8'. •\ d. FOR DETAILS SHOWING LADDER. STEPS, HANDHOLDS ETC. SEE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STD DWG 9-074 OCATCH BASIN DETAILS'. e. SHEAR/CLEANOUT GATE SHALL BE ALUMINUM ALLOY ASTM B-26-ZG-32a OR CAST IRON ASTM A48 CLASS 30B AND JOINED TO TEE SECTION BY BOLTING THRU FLANGE. WELDING OR '1 OTHER SECURE MEANS. MATING BETWEEN MOVING PARTS AND GASKETS PER WSDOT STD PLAN B-3. g. LIFT ROD SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MFR WITH HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN ' 1'-0' OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOOK LOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLO. h. ALL METAL PARTS & SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL.OR \ GALVANIZED. i . RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE CUT ROUND AND SMOOTH. y WHERE CMP PIPE IS USED, NEOPRENE GASKETS ARE REQUIRED O ALL PIPE JOINTS. \ k. THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM .060' ALUMINUM OR .064 ALUMINIZED STEEL OR .064 GALVANIZED (TREATMENT 1 ) STEEL PIPE. IN ACCORDANCE \\ WITH AASHTO M36, M196, M197 & M274. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF MATCHING MATERIAL SEE DETAIL FOR THICKNESS. \ 1. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE ANCHORED 0 3'-0- OC MAX WITH 5/8-DIA STAINLESS STEEL \ EXPANSION BOLTS OR ANCHOR BOLTS WITH 2' EMBED IN WALL. m. THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CMP SEWER PIPE WITH A STANDARD COUPLING BAND. 9. SLOPE OF STORM DRAIN (SD) AND SANITARY SEWER (SS) SHALL BE OF UNIFORM GRADIENT 98• d� BETWEEN THE INVERT ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE DWGS 1 O" ,\ I 1 w � \ o 1 2a9.N wV_2.1.e1 OP_I�1.63 \ . � avv.w_74S58 LEGEND © SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 0 STORM DRAW 0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SD— STORM SEWER SS— SANITARY SEWER V— WATERLINE G - GAS LINE P - POWER TiC- TELEPHONE/CABLE .■..■■ � o1w si 4 LAI, 0� � :.r.tr.r. r•rC.�rii��li ¢aav,.Qa �� Y-Z 1 J STA STA STA STA STA S1A STA STA STA STA 0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+63t 1+75 2+00 wcn I� I a� IN I �I� I< I I I I I I I EXISTING G RADE I 3 N>- O �j � PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE I SHOWN DASHED -THIS REGION } v 10 I SHOWN SOLID THIS EGION QI I z I I I I I I Z I� Iw SCA;2IFY 12" & RECOMPACT - -- U i Fo I I I ® 46% MAX DRY DENSITY I I TO AR 1 = ___ - - - EL 240 w a la ADD STRUCT FILL FOR MIN COVE OVER INVERT HOUSE _ - - - - I I I I - I EL 230 Y - - - -- - - - -'- - - - - - - - - -- - - --'- - -'- -- - - - - - - -'-'-'-'-'-'-'-' - - - - - -'- - - - - -'-'- -'- - -'---- - - - - - - - --.LOPE 7�2 Z[- - - - - - - - - - - -' - - - - _.-. -5-' - - - - - - - - - - - -:_: - - LE.=218. I E. 2 ®DIVED -'--'----'---'----'-'--------- - - - - - - - - - --;-'-----------------;-------'-------'-'-;------- ------'---'------i------'--'--- --------- --- --- - - --- --- -;-' ----'- - - - -...0- UAJ:&3t:_: - :- - - - -- ---- ;-'-'- - - ------EL -- 220 APPROX. SS INVERT IZTES —'— _ — — --- _.-- - - —'—'— ------- —'— — —'— ---- — — --- --II— ------ — — --- — — ——'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'—'— — — — — — --- — —'—'—'—'—'— —'— ——'—'—'—'— — — — — — — — — —'--' — ——'---'—'— — — —'—'— —'--- — --1— -- — ----- ---'— — - - -�---- —'— — — --- — — — —'— --- — — — —'— — — — — _:__: — — :_: — — :-: — — -: — — _:_: — —'— —'— — _ — — _: — — -- : ___: --------J� -- - --- ------ ---- ----- ---- - ---- --- i ----- - - ----J EL 1 2 0 DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION, E-E FILENAME: NUDRLONG.DWG ® SANITARY -6.EWER DWG. SCALE: t"=W h ci's C1,5 ��,�2� N� �h� Abu � i r JI J) WI QI m oI LiI I I PROPOSED FI I ISH GRADE / FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS REGION I BENCH EXIST GRADE Tp KEY INTO NEW STRUCT FILL PER GEOTECH REgORT _ - -- PHASE I I PHASE III HOUSE EL 278'-6- FUTU E REINF. CONC. RETA ING WALL EXISTI GRADE SHOWN DASHE THIS REGION REINF. CO RETAINING F- L 25 - WALL SEE HT SA2.1 FG 250'-0 F E 25i'-6' ----------------------- �- ---- -- - - -- - -- - SITE SECTION D—D SCALE: 1 "=10' w� Z. wl Z I i I Q ml re a- w QI 0 a r w- - EL 300 i - E L 290 EL 280 4 EL 270 XL EL 260 EL 250 - -I ---- --- -- -- ---- - - -' EL 240 I EL 230 I NOTE: SEE SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY ELEVATIONS SEE SHT C1.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION i 11 CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES: - _ - - - - -1-SANITARY SDIE-SEWEA PIPE SHALL BE "A. PVC . INSTALL SANITARY SEWER AND TIGHTUNE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE UL PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS 2. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE "A. PVC (ASTM D3034 MIN) INSTALL STORM SEWER AND TIGHTLINE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCK UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE IX PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DW,S. A STENCIL CATCH BASIN LID WITH ' DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO SOUND' ( 1//22 MIN LETTER SZE) 4. INSTALL WATER SERVICE CONN AT STREET, WATER METER, A WATERLINE ; `BG TUNE ALL CONNECTIONS WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. 5. EMBED CLEANOUT CAP IN 18' X18' X12' CONRETE PAD 8. VISUAL INSPECTION OF UTILITY TRENCHES h TIGHTUNES REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO BACKFILL OPERATIONS 7. BACKFTLL MATERIAL R COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR OUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PER OF EDMONDS G DIVISION DESIGN STDS. B. FILLSCITY PLACED ON SLOPES SHIN VIBE TETERRACED(SENCHED) AND KEYED INTO THE SLOPE THE BENCHES SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE SLIPPING OF THE FILL DOWN THE HIUSDE AT THE INTERFACE OF THE EXISTING SOIL AND THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FILL 9. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 (AASHTO M199) AND ASTM C890 UNO:( SEE DETAILS 3/0.5, 1/Ct.e. 2/Ct.e, 3/C1.8 ) a HAND HOLDS IN PRECAST EXTENSION RINGS SHALL HAVE 3' MIN CLEARANCE, STEPS OR LADDERS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6' MIN CLEARANCE b. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED c PRECAST BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2' MIN. H KNOOKOUTS OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. MAX HOLE SZE FOR 48' DIA CATCH BASIN IS 36'. MIN CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8'. 0. FOR DETAILS SHOWING LADDER, STEPS. HANDHOLDS ETC. SIT SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STD DWG 9-074 'CATCH BASIN DETAW. s SHEAR/CLEANOUT GATE SHALL BE ALUMINUM ALLOY ASTM B-28-ZG-320 OR CAST IRON ASTM A48 CLASS SOB AND JOINED TO TEE SEC710N BY BOLTING THRU FLANGE, WELDING OR OTHER SECURE MEANS MATING BETWEEN MOVING PARTS AND GASKETS PER WS)OT STD PLAN B-3. q. LIFT ROD SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MFR WITH HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN V-O' OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOOK LOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HAND HOD. h. ALL METAL PARTS h SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALVANIZED. L RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE OUT ROUND'AND SMOOTH. WHERE CUP PIPE IS USED, NEOPRENE GASKETS ARE REQUIRED O ALL PIPE JOINTS THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM .060' ALUMINUM OR .064 ALUMINIZED STEEL OR .054 GALVANIZED TREATMENT 1 ) STEEL PIPE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36, MIK M197 k M274. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF MATCHING MATERIAL SEE DETAIL FOR THICKNESS. I. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL DE ANCHORED O Y-O' OC MAX WITH 5/8'0IA STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR ANCHOR BOLTS WITH Z' EMBED IN WALL m. THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CMP SEWER PIPE W17H A STANDARD COUPLING BAND. 9. SLOPE OF STORM DRAIN (AND SANITARY SEWER (SS) 71GHTUNES SHALL BE OF UNIFORM GRADIENT BETWEEN THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OVEN ON THE OWGS AS -BUILT SCALE 1:20 @ 24inchX36inch SHEET LEGEND s© SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ❑ STORM DRAIN ® STORM DRAIN MANHOLE -SIN- STORM SEWER SS SANITARY SEWER V - WATERLINE 0- GAS LINE P - POWER TELEPHONE/CABLE d `s > td m 7 Q W C/) C boa o N O m C U N ,G r C C 'v 0 O U Q (tl y LL O) mC Of d y J O '_) OJL M O C U ` W W c U W ^� a W O •� Ld �r Q� V 4- I I O Z 0 m 0 3 F= O Sheet No: C1.3 CID <1 g Nib. �4WJM 'PAW I W-FTW4A po W, al - ON 0 k-W MR OR L� 9 ALI APPLE AFDC' 0 OF 15"CEDAR .8 • 1 11C DAR OC x 0 CApp ED R 5D 3-12"BIRCH Ahn;l 0 let Ln 40 • 8"BIRCH 9' IRCH �Ilooeo Ormill hCh"Al-M rA s ED tK N " A,k I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 \il 3PH/ALT COATED�� :N TI ON PIPE 1 �a er c'�Ti c/rr � of O,c, c�p�O,gO 2jOtin qS JUNCTION STRUCTURE 11 PER CITY OF EDMONDS MAINLINE ENGINEERING DEPT. APPROX DESIGN STANDARDS 2c 1627C13.DWG INV.E=245.78 \/ INV.W=245.68 / I L i w 0 I 11 DALE r"" ACH l l 1 m I\s N E CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES: — — — 1-SANITARY SIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6"DIA. PVC . INSTALL SANITARY SEWER AND TIGHTLINE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1%. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 2. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6"DIA. PVC (ASTM D3034 MIN) . INSTALL STORM SEWER AND TIGHTLINE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1%. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 3. STENCIL CATCH BASIN LID WITH " DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO SOUND" ( 1/2" MIN LETTER SIZE) 4. INSTALL WATER SERVICE CONN AT STREET, WATER METER, & WATERLINE TIGHTLINE ALL CONNECTIONS WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. 5. EMBED CLEANOUT CAP IN 16" X16" X12" CONRETE PAD 6. VISUAL INSPECTION OF UTILITY TRENCHES & TIGHTLINES REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO BACKFILL OPERATIONS. 7. BACKFILL MATERIAL & COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DESIGN STDS. 8. FILLS PLACED ON SLOPES SHOULD BE TERRACED(BENCHED) AND KEYED INTO THE SLOPE. THE BENCHES SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE SLIPPING OF THE FILL DOWN THE HILLSIDE AT THE INTERFACE OF THE EXISTING SOIL AND THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FILL. 9. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 (AASHTO M199) AND ASTM C890 UNO: ( SEE DETAILS 3/C1.5, 1 /C1.6, 2/C1.6, 3/C1.6 ) a. HAND HOLDS IN PRECAST EXTENSION RINGS SHALL HAVE 3" MIN CLEARANCE, STEPS OR LADDERS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6" MIN CLEARANCE. b. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED c. PRECAST BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MIN. KNOCKOUTS OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. MAX HOLE SIZE FOR 48" DIA CATCH BASIN IS 36". MIN CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8". d. FOR DETAILS SHOWING LADDER, STEPS, HANDHOLDS ETC. SEE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STD DWG 9-074 "CATCH BASIN DETAILS". e. SHEAR/CLEANOUT GATE SHALL BE ALUMINUM ALLOY ASTM B-26—ZG-32a OR CAST IRON ASTM A48 CLASS 30B AND JOINED TO TEE SECTION BY BOLTING THRU FLANGE, WELDING OR OTHER SECURE MEANS. MATING BETWEEN MOVING PARTS AND GASKETS PER WSDOT STD PLAN B-3. g. LIFT ROD SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MFR WITH HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN 1'-0" OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOOK LOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLD. h. ALL METAL PARTS & SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALVANIZED. L RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE CUT ROUND AND SMOOTH. j. WHERE CMP PIPE IS USED, NEOPRENE GASKETS ARE REQUIRED ® ALL PIPE JOINTS. k. THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM .060" ALUMINUM OR .064 ALUMINIZED STEEL OR .064 GALVANIZED (TREATMENT 1 ) STEEL PIPE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36, M196, M197 & M274. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF MATCHING MATERIAL SEE DETAIL FOR THICKNESS. I. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE ANCHORED ® 3'-0" OC MAX WITH 5/8"DIA STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR ANCHOR BOLTS WITH 2" EMBED IN WALL. m. THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CMP SEWER PIPE WITH A STANDARD COUPLING BAND. 9. SLOPE OF STORM DRAIN (SD) AND SANITARY SEWER (SS) TIGHTLINES SHALL BE OF UNIFORM GRADIENT BETWEEN THE INVERT ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE DWGS I LEGEND II ss SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ❑ STORM DRAIN so STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SD--- STORM SEWER SS SANITARY SEWER W WATERLINE GAS LINE P POWER T/C TELEPHONE/CABLE JUN 191997 N t, 1 dryCN - p� Q- 4 uj i � � W cn Sheet No: c 1 -(631 E LI .. ■ ROP-TY/. COIsNE n 1IORNERo �• �, o ff irk -' , ; �� : ��, ��• J '� ,,H R "Im- J a 1► ;� •. - . ► ` fi ••, • ,��' � ��j� ill 0 i MOM MEMO PARTIAL SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PROPOSED FINISH GRADES SHOWN AS SOLID, EXIST GRADES WHERE DIFFERENT FROM PROPOSED GRADES ARE SHOWN DASHED a 2. HOUSE GRIDLINE INTERSECTIONS ARE LOCATED RELATIVE TO Z PROPERTY CORNERS,(WHERE THE LETTER PRIOR TO THE DIMENSION INDICATES THE DIRECTION; IE. W=TRUE WEST...) THE REMAINING DIMENSIONS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SHT SA2.1 7' RADIUS3. ALL FACE OFROCKERY ALLOUTS ARE TO TOP OF EXTERIOR PARTIAL SITE PLAN (FRONT) J V1 Lul J� zI EL 290 J 1I yI �i U <-- ryLLJ. Q m ml Li EL 280 0 I - EL 270 _ (EXISTING GRADE SHOWN - - DASHED THIS REGION -' _. I I - - - - _ - _ EL 260 - - - PROPOSED FINISH GRADE -. SHOWN SOLID THIS -- -_ _ -. --. --• -- REGION250 --. __. - BENCH EXIST GRADE TO KEY INTO NEW STRUCT - - - - ...... -- -- - FILL PER GEOTECH REPORT I - - - - - - - - - - _ - •--- —•--- —•--- —.—• —— _— _—.—._.— -- -- -- -- - - —�- -IL- - - - - - - - - -- EL 230 NOTE: SEE FOR CKERY �CONSTRUCTIONELEVATIONS SESITE SECTION A -A C1 7 FOR ROCKERY SCALE: 1 "=10' JI JI zl EL 290 J U Q HOUSE OUTLINE mI oI - - EL 280 cwnl PHASE II w _ _ _ EXISTING GRADE SHOWN I - - - - - _ EL 270 DASHED THIS REGION -. --- - - - - - - - - -- REINF. CONC. RETAINING =' -_-- ---- +-- - •- -• •- - -• - - EL 260 WALL SEE SHT. SA2.1 -' F . EL 55'-6"_' PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ GEL 25 - -- -- - -- ---- FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS _ -; an REGION FGEL250 o" --- — — -- -- -- EL 250 -•- -.-- BENCH EXIST GRADE TO -_ -_ • - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ KEY INTO NEW STRUCT - '- _ ... .... - -' - - - - - FILL PER GEOTECH REPORT •'' ,- _, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _- _ _- - - _ - _ _ 240 EL 2,30 NOTE: SEE SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY ELEVATIONS SITE SECTION 13-13 SEE SHT C1.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1 "=10' V-4)SCALE: 1 "=10' 01' %��u z z PHASE I PHASE III EL 290 wl wl EXISTING GRADE SHOWN EL 290 JI JI . HOUSE �- -� J - DASHED THIS REGION �) �I d Y) HOUSE OUTLINE i—PHASE .........OUTLIN.E........... Q - - — _ Q. I w �- m o w • ......••••• : _ - _ _ - _ EL 280 w oI �I PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ `�' _. _ _ _. EL 280 �I cnI """ ""' FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS �. w. : - - - - - - n l wl ; ........ REGION - - - - co -- -- - - EL 270_-_ -- • FUTURE REINF. CONC. :- --- - - � - - � � - - � � - - � � - -' _ EL 270 RETAINING WALL _ _ ...... _ _ _ _ _ I I REINF. CONC. RETAINING ,- -- --- - - -' EXISTING GRADE SHOWN '� LL WALL SEE SKIT. � SA2.1 DASHED THIS REGION 260 ( I -- -- - - - - - r ' - - - _ -- _-- _-- 'f -- ' _ E L 260 REINF. CONS. RETAINING PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ WALL SEE SHT SA2.1 --. r__ _ _ G L 2 5- ( I FG EL 25'� "'= -- --- - _. _ ------ -� _ - _ _, FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS FF. EL 251'-6" _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - . _ REGION FG 250 -0 _ - . _, _ - _ . _. _ _ . FF EL 251'-6" -- - -- _ - - - - - -- - - L-25 — — • - - --------, ---------. __. _ - F L 250'-0" - — — . _ _ EL 250 - - _ _ . . - - .�_. _ EL 250 - ............- - - - BENCH EXIST GRADE TO I -_' - - BENCH EXIST GRADE TV _._._. _. _ _ _ _ _, _ _. _ _ _ KEY INTO NEW STRUCT KEY INTO NEW STRUCT _. _ ' FILL PER GEOTECH REPOR ' EL 240 ' FILL PER GEOTECH REI�ORT - _._ ._._._. _ _ _ _ ._ _. _ _. - - - - ._ _. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EL 240 - •_ ._ _ -. _. -. _ - • > -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - EL 230 -- _------- --- - --- -- - - _. __. --- - - - - - - - dEL 230 SITE SECTION D-D NOTE: SEE SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY SEE SHT C1.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS NOTE: SEE SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY ELEVATIONS SITE SECTION C C "=10' SEE SHT C1.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION ' SCALE: 1 lenr-� 1627C14.DWG SCALE: 1 "=10' N . E.. -94 a � O � W 4 a 2 0 oa � � w too cis z Shot No: CIA Qe. . 32'-9„ g'-2" N N 34'-6„ w r DRIVEWAY w w Z, J' 6,-3„ 5Z Z ,-3„ 6'-3„ v 20' f 0„ Q 2'-0" 2'-0" 5'-0" 2'4 0" 5'-0" ,DEL 274_ _ _ _ _ _ _._.-.-._._._._.-._._ �FG AB�---------- 7FG AS - - - -'- - _._._ _._._._._._._._._ _._._._._ 3/4" CHAMFER �._._._ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 'EL 273 'EL 273' _. - -- .-.-.-.-.-.-._ _._-.-.-._._. GRASS STRIP -1 EL 272' N SLOPE ,�6- N SLOPE 3/16t:12 SL PE 1 DEL 272 - - - - - - - --'-.-•-•-•.-.-.-.-'- -• FG 51 ° — _ _ o Cr cn z z �----- - -.- - - - _. _._ _._ _. _. _._ _._ - - - - - I J w - �EL 268 _._. _ _. _. ._._ _.-. ._._ -. - - - - - - - - - - - - �, � EL 268 U I - 5" SOG COORD �' 4" ABC COMPACT _ - - . _ - . - - ' Qc Q - REINF W/ STAMPED TO 97% MAX DRY EL 266'_' - . _ . _ . - . - FG BEW-- ' - ' - ' - ' EL 265 i FG BE L • - ' - - - ' - - - - - - - EL 266' > CONC. CONTRACTOR > DENSITY •EL 265, - . � �t- EL264 ...... ...... ...... __-1EL264 — — fff <I EL 262' C._.—.—.—.—.—.—._.—.—._.—. .— _._._j ME C.. C._.-.—._._._._._.—. _._._._._._._._._._._._._._.� EL 262 �, ROCKERY ELEV. NOTES: 3:I W U Z)_ a� U _u) UPPER ROCKERY SCALE: 3/16"=1'-O" HORIZ DIMENSIONS GIVEN ARE APPROXIMATE. ROCKERIES CURVED IN PLAN HAVE BEEN STRAIGHTENED TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OF MATERIAL QUANTITIES. lu Lu U STEEPER BATTER (1.-4.8) OF ROCK FACE IN THIS REGION ui MIDDLE ROCKERY �V) SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 3@ • • • ' EL ABV �.I�. �. .� .�► �. �.. �.� �� ` ••I� i �.. �� r. Imo. _ �. •� I_� •� �� r.... �� • • �� 1► r i�� . it _ , �► �� Ir I� �� I► Imo._ 4 �� r ` • 1.�. go Iwa Pilo 0411 • J. 01 W, 01 a T1,81, P^ 01 IN , "WRY, a. EL 248 Fir I I 1. EL � • 'EL 244 �.FL _242 oN U � W cf) W (/') �- FIN. GRADE BEL-J VARIES V-0" qr�jw I— w (nv) TYP. DRIVEWAY SECTION— TRANSVERSE 3/4" CHAMFER V-0" Filename: Drivesec.dwg SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" Dwg Scale: 3/8"=V-0" SIDEWALK ABV. OFFSET CATCH BASIN CENTERLINE AS REQD SO THAT WEST EDGE- OF GRATE ALIGNS W/ EAST EDGE OF SIDE- WALK CB 5 1 /2f". STAMPED CONC. DRIVEWAY LOWER ROCKERY 3 CATCH BASIN AND GRATE LOCATION — PLAN. SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" C1'5 SCALE: 3/8"=V-0" Filename: CBPLAN.dwg�� Dwg Scale: 3/8 =1 —0 STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA 0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 1 +00 1 +25 1 +50 1 +63f 1 +75 2+00 z �, ry i n z10 II Q F_Cn I I I I I I I I iw Q I I I I I I I � U i!w w I}- li � I i I I I I I I >- I! ¢I li z I I I I I I IL.LI z _.-._._._- � III I �—'—.— -'-----------:-.—_�.—_�. .—.—.—. � w n ®9 %MAX DRY DENSITY TOWARD ............ :_:_:_:__.J.-----_ -�'1 ---- EL 240 o. I° ADD� STRUCT FILL FOR HOUSE ------- I_.-.- ---._. .-._._.- _._._.� ._._._ - _.-.-.-.-.-.- 1i -------- MIN COVER OVER INVERT .r...w — — —_.—._._._._._.— —•—•— —•—•——•—•—•— 1_0� _._._._._._._. _._._._._._ _.1. - - - --._..�._._._.+.�._._.� I .................... I EL 230 ' ----- —.—•—•—.—•--- ----I------ r---r'T --I------—i---------- 1 I.E.=218. 3±------------ ._._._._.-._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. I _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _ _._._._._._._._._._. I----------- - --' _._._._._._._._ _._._._._._._._._._._. .-.-._.-._.-.-.-.-._._._._.-.-._._.-.-.-._.-._.-._._.-.-._._._.SL1�PE._1�/t: _._.-.-.-._.-._._._._._._._._._._ _._. __._._._._.. 2 _ _ _ _ _ _ _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _._._._._._._._._ _ _ _ _ -�- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - I _._._._._..�._.-.-.-.-._.t._._.�._._._. _ _._ _._. I.E.._= 2 i .-._._.i .._._.�._._._._._._I_._._._ 1 - - -'- - -'- .-.-.-'-...- - 5.5 -'- - -'- -'- --'-'-'- _._._._._._. i -_._._._._ ® DIVE D Vi1N ............. -------------------------------- - - -'- ------- - - - - -'- - - - - - ._._._._.._._._.._._._._1._._._.�..-._.r._.-.-.-.-.--_._.-.-.._._._._._.� APPROX. SS INVERTL _._._._. ._._._._._._._._._._._._. I_._._._._._._._._._._____________________________________________________�___________________�___ '_._._. ._._._._._._ —._._._._._.—._.—. '.l .—._.—.—.—.--4-- ._._i._._._.�._._._.�. I._._.�--.—._._._._I_.—.—.—. �_____- I __--.-. .—._._._._.� . o ._.-4._._._----._.-._._.-._.-.-.-.-._._._._.-I_.-._._.-._._._._.-._.-._._._._.-.-.-.-._._._ i ._._._.-._.-.-.-.-.-.-.-._._._._.-._._._.-._.-.-.-._.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-----.-.---'-•-.-----.-----.-----.-----------------------------------.------------ -I-------�------------ -------------------.� r.-.---.-.------.-.--.-.---.---'- -I - - r.-.-.-.-.-.-j- -.-.- I_.-.__-.-._._._._._._._._._.—._._ .-.-.-.-.-. -_.-.-.-.-._ -------- -- if - --------------- - - - - ----- -'- ........................ _ ..... - — - ------------------ _._._._._ _._._._.._._—_-._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.-_-. ._._._. -- -------------------- _ .—_._.-._._._._._._. -._.__._._._._._._._._._._._._. ._._._.__. _ _.-.-._.-._._._._._._ ._._._._._. _--- —-EL 210 — DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E—E WG �Cl � SANITARY SEWER °"�"s�ELE '��'��c O A U. ` C C U r===4 � O Cn � � w f ® • �' o •• Sheet No: C1.5 a ell R. nn"vn A" ni n NOTE: CONST. SHALL BE PER CATCH BASIN TYPE 1), UNO CONTROL STRUCTURE SCALE: 1 "=1'-O" STA 00 w cn ry I zo Q z 0 U) ' Q :�i >I 0 �w wLijIw �0 >I w >- r") U) z � U J n- O fry— U w o' z n wl „ 11-7t -0 z w U 0 25 45'-0" RIM EL=226.3t ATE nco MC'nn-r B- R C -C ISE DH( 0 TI OI PI )C m TB AL ��i ,C_ I L ��L COURSE SAME AS GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING NOTE: SEE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES ON SHT. C1.3 FOR ADDL INFO n/\„\/n A„ /1I f CATCH BASIN, TYPE II SCALE: 1 "=1'-O" STA STA STA STA STA STA STA 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+59t 1+75 RIM EL =2' 6.9t —.— --SLOPE 1/8:'12— @ DIVE DO _._. ._._._. 2.�._ -. .� . _._._._._. _. _.pp3 _ _._._._. _ _. AP_ ROX. SD INVERT L 216.05' I.E.=219.25' _ ®GYRE OU LET{—�_._._._._._._._._. _. _._. =._. _. _.�._ ._._._. ._._._.--- _._._. ------- GRATE TO BE LOCKED DOWN W/ (2) 5/8"0 STAINLESS STEEL SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREWS r ALTERNATE A TOP VIEW N � 3/4" NORMAL TO BAR SECTION B-B DIMENSIONS SECTION A -A APPROX. WEIGHT FRAME 170 LBS. GRATE 128 LBS. TOTAL 298 LBS. w1 & w2 t R d 1" Min. 1 3/4 Max. 1 3/4" 26" 1 5/8" 1" Min. 1 3/4 Max. 1 1/2" 21" 2 3/4" I I L 00 I I 2' - 0" 2'- 0 1 4" 2" 2'- 5 1 4" TOWARD - - - ' I I I I IHOUSE 240 ------------------- SCARIFY 1 " & RECONPACI - - - - - - © 95% MAXDRY DENSITY �� -. - _. ...... ADD STRU T FILL FOR MIN. COVET _.—._ ._ _ EL 230 --------------•— — —--------- — — --- ----- ----- — - - - - - - - - - sLopE�s �:-.-.-.-.-.-....-.-.-.-...- -.... .... - _. I.E. 2 5.5 ____________________________________ ®STA 1 59 EL 220 I.E. = 219.6f ._._._--,_._.-,_ _ _ _._._._._._._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --- -. ._. C_B. INLET _._._....... ...... ...... _._._. ...... .........EL 210 �t N � CO �- � � ca r- 1'-i0 1 2" FRAME d- � 2 1 2" 3/4 *1 5/8 -�- /8 1 5/8" SECTION D-D NOTE: MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT FRAME AND GRATE FILENAME: GRATE.DWG SCALE: NTS DWG. SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" c rn N DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E—E FILENAME: DRLONGIT.DWG DWG. SCALE: 1"=10' �•6 @ STORK DRAIN `ilenc, 1627C16.DWG 40 Sheet No: CL6 H — 2 )_0)) - A SCALE: 3/4"=1'-O" _ABLE CAP SOIL SURFACE D 4 INCH CRUSHED K OR QUARRY LLS (W/MAX 5% SING #200 SIEVE) 3LE CUT FACE ATIVE MATERIAL �OMPACTED JCTURAL FILL 5 PERF OR SLOTTED AIN PIPE MIN 1 %-2% )PE TO OUTLET rOR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC 6'-6" MIN EXTENT OF FILL OVERBUILDFOR FILL CONDITION(MAX SLOPE) 2IMPERMEABLE CAP OR TOP SOIL 4 �'�'�IF FLAT SURFACE ----------- i1 � SLOPE 0 Oo0o L0 2 TO 4INCH CRUSHED OROCK OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% PASSING #200 SIEVE) PROPOSED OR i 0O0 GRADE � oO oEXIST. O STABLE CUT FACE 001'-0" IN NATIVE MATERIAL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL OOOMIN O o O 00O o °° °6 ° ° ° °° °T/PIPE 6"0 PERF OR SLOTTED BELOW 0 ° o ° ° °.o o DRAIN PIPE MIN 1%-2% THIS LINE �- ° ° ° ° ° SLOPE TO OUTLET � � 1 "0 OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL H = 4— 0 WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC SCALE: 3/4"=1'-O" =1 I I=1 11=1 I I—N ,r 8'-6" MIN-'' EXTENT OF FILL OVERBUILD FOR FILL CONDITION (MAX SLOPE) , 2 MPERMEABLE CAP 4 �R TOP SOIL F FLAT SURFACE NERWRI p,*;* ROCK OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% STABLE CUT FACE AAA AAA w �_1..o?•?.f f ORMOR SCALE: 3/4"=1'-O" TYP -1 BATTER 4I STEEPER BATTERC� MIDDLE ROCKE YSEE SHT C1.5 FOR EXTENT 4.8oro PROPOSED OR EXIST. GRADE L 1 0 6 T/PIPE BELOW THIS LINE H_g�_0 SCALE: 3/4"=1'-O" OR COMPACTED MIN. STRUCTURAL FILL CD ROCK ZE ROCK WEIGHT RANGE (POUNDS) * AVERAGESI DIMENSION1 MAN 50 - 200 LBS t22 MAN 200 - 700 LBS 1g _3 MAN 700 - 2000LBS 28 -4 MAN 2000 - 4000 LBS 36 -5 MAN 4000 - 6000 LBS 486 MAN 6000 - 8000 LBS 54 - * THE MINIMUM DENSITY OF THE ROCK SHALL BE 160PCF 6"0 PERF OR SLOTTED DRAIN PIPE MIN 1%-2% SLOPE TO OUTLET 1"0 OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC (MAX SLOPE)2I� �' 1 1% SLOPE IMPERMEABLE CAP OR TOP SOIL IF FLAT SURFACE O o O o O o°o °o O�oO O�oO O0o 00Oo0OOOO000 o O o O0 0 00O o0Oo0OO O(�O O0 oo00O o0 0000oOO2 TO 4 INCH CRUSHED O0o 00 ROCK OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% o0Oo0 PASSING #200 SIEVE) O0, O000 O 0000 0000O oSTABLE CUT FACE �t� IN NATIVE MATERIAL 6"0 PERF OR SLOTTED DRAIN PIPE MIN 1%-2% SLOPE TO OUTLET 1"0 OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC LENGTH (INCHES) 18INCHES28 INCHES36 INCHES48 INCHES54 INCHES60 INCHES LENGTH 18 INCHES 28 INCHES 36 INCHES � cn 48 INCHES .-.� N 54 INCHES 60 INCHES o � ncn CL ROCKERY NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE LATEST "STANDARD ROCK WALL `� 4w �~ CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES" AS PUT OUT BY THE ASSOCIATION OF ROCKERY �� s �� w 4 CONTRACTORS WOODINVILLE,WA. (HEREAFTER CALLED THE "ARC GUIDELINES")AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THOSE GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN THE STANDARD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL ROCK SHALL BE SOUND,ANGULAR,LEDGE ROCK THAT IS RESISTANT TO WEATHERING. THE LONGEST DIMENSION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL ROCK SHOULD NOT EXCEED 3 TIMES THE SHORTEST DIMENSION.ROCK SELECTION SHALL BE PER ARC GUIDELINES 3.01.13 3. QUARRY SOURCES SHALL HAVE TESTING PROGRAMS ACCORDING TO THE ARC GUIDELINES IN PLACE AND SUBMIT CURRENT GEOLOGIC AND TEST DATA TO THE CONTRACTOR. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE ROCK SIZES SET FORTH IN THE DRAWINGS AND SHALL ENSURE A DISTRIBUTION OF ROCK SIZES, WITH THE LARGEST ROCKS ON THE BOTTOM AND PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER ROCKS UP TO THE TOP. THE LONG DIRECTION OF THE ROCKS MUST EXTEND INTO THE SLOPE BEHIND THE ROCKERY (PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL FACE). 5. THE FIRST COURSE(KEYWAY) SHALL BE PLACED ON FIRM UNYIELDING SOIL, WITH FULL CONTACT BETWEEN THE ROCK AND SOIL, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHAPING OF THE GROUND SURFACE TO RECEIVE THE FIRST COURSE OF ROCKS. THE BASE COURSE OF ROCKS MUST BE EMBEDDED INTO THIS FIRM SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES OR GREATER AS NOTED TO PROVIDE A SECURE -BASE FOR-- 1HE R-OCKERY. THE- COMPETENCY- OF -THIS- KEYWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO ARC GUIDELINE 3.01.10 6. ROCKERY COURSING SHALL BE PLACED IN A RUNNING BOND TYPE PATTERN TO LOCK INTO ROCKS OF ADJACENT COURSES, THERE SHALL BE NO CONTINUOUS JOINT PLANES IN THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL DIRECTION. EACH ROCK SHALL BEAR ON TWO OR MORE ROCKS BELOW IT WITH GOOD BEARING BETWEEN FLAT ROCK FACES (FLAT TO FLAT CONTACT). THE TOP SURFACE OF THE ROCK SHOULD SLOPE BACK TOWARDS THE CUT FACE AND AWAY FROM THE FACE OF THE WALL. 7. VOIDS GREATER THAN 6" BETWEEN ADJACENT ROCK FACES, WHERE NO CONTACT BETWEEN THE ROCKS EXISTS THROUGH THE THICKNESS OF THE WALL, SHALL BE CHINKED WITH A SMALLER PIECE OF ROCK. 8. A 1'-0" THICK SURFACE SEAL SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOP OF THE GRAVEL DRAINAGE BLANKET AND SLOPED AWAY FROM THE TOP OF THE WALL WHERE POSSIBLE. 9. ANY FILL BEHIND THE ROCKERY SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED AS EACH COURSE IS LAID UP. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAX 10" LIFTS TO 95%MAX DRY DENSITY AT OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT PER ASTM D1557 WITH HAND OPERATED COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. 10. ROCKERIES CONSTRUCTED AGAINST FILL LESS THAN 8'-0" IN HEIGHT SHALL BE BUILT BY OVERBUILDING THE FILL AREA TO ACHIEVE MORE EFFICIENT COMPACTION AND A MORE COMPETENT FILL MASS. FILL COMPOSITION AND PLACEMENT COMPACTION SHALL BE PER GEOTECH REPORT (MIN 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAX. DRY DENSITY @ OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT PER ASTM D-1557) IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED AT RANDOM LOCATIONS WITHIN EACH LIFT TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE COMPACTION IS BEING ACHIEVED. 11. DRAIN TILE SHALL BE TIGHTLINED WITH POSITIVE GRADIENT AND DRAINED TO AN APPROVED POINT OF DISCHARGE PER THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPT.STANDARDS. 12. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SHALL BE RETAINED FOR SPECIAL GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION. ALL ROCKERIES CONSTRUCTED AGAINST CUTS OR FILLS 6'-0" AND OVER IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PERIODICALLY MONITORED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ARC GUIDELINES AND SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. ON COMPLETION OF THE ROCK WALL THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CLIENT, THE ROCK WALL CONTRACTOR, AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COPIES OF THE ROCK WALL GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION REPORTS ALONG WITH A FINAL REPORT SUMMARIZING THE ROCK WALL CONSTRUCTION. THE ROCKERY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TIMELINE AND COORDINATE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, SO THAT THE OBSERVATIONS CAN BE SCHEDULED ACCORDINGLY. 13. ANY SLOPE EXISTING ABOVE A COMPLETED ROCKERY WALL SHALL BE COVERED WITH DEEP ROOTED, QUICK GROWING VEGETATION BY THE OWNER AS OUTLINED IN 3.01.6 OF THE ARC GUIDELINES. 14. 0 INDICATES SIZE OF ROCK REQUIRED SEE TABLE ABOVE. cn id cnl cn 0 Sheet No: c 1.7 er 1627C17.DWG FILE W-1- J U N 19 1 l°C, eYCT0 °," O�,FR ENO + 312'9 GS CA O A LE ; - ;' A C W + 3�'15s GS + 30 3 �7.7 GS \a + 292.6 � N n z \ O LO vo 4 W CH Ll( ATE / 12&QX _ — — — — — — — e E SCALE 1" = 2 0' CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2' DATUM: CITY OF EDMONDS BASIS OF BEARINGS: RECORD OF SURVEY V. 32 P, 236 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portione of Tracts 49 & 50 Meadowdole beach, recorded In Volume 5 of Plate, page 38, and Tract 50, Meadowdole Beach Supplemental Plat, recorded In Volume 5 of Plate, page 4Z Records of Snohomish County, Washington. I LEGEND I ss SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE _ — 0 - --STORM lAIN-- -- -- -- So STORM DRAIN MANHOLE ° TREE CONIFER TREE C. TREE DECIDUOUS TREE —x---- $ - CHAIN LINK FENCE —�--- - WOOD FENCE ^ =- BRICK RETAINING WALL RR TIE RETAINING WALL SS PIPE _SD —STORM PIPE W - - W WATER PIPE -o- UTILITY POLE ANCHOR C UTILITY POLE ANCHOR ® WATER METER WATER VALVE ROCK WALL tt — WIRE STOCK FENCE NOTE: ELECTRONIC FILE AS RECEIVED FROM GROUP IV INC. THE ONLY ITEMS ADDED HAVE t o04 o 0 Cn co 39 C6 .may 0 I;anome: 1627C11.DWG \ \ BEEN THIS NOTE AND THE TITLE BLOCK Sheet No: �'s F111- /U0 1 o1997 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1� RL I UUA I tU TION PIPE eycT��oF F JUNCTION STRUCTURE PER CITY OF EDMOND ENGINEERING DEPT. /, DESIGN STANDARDS filename: 1627C13.DWG -- 1 Iw- pv- SS 0 \ p 1 \ 2410 HALF NUUND CMP CULVERIIN �\ � 4'-0" WIDE C6C CAP SERV Low REQUIRED. CALL 771-0235 STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERLINE GAS LINE POWER TELEPHONE/CABLE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES: -` 1-SANITAR-Y SIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6"DIA. PVC . INSTALL SANITARY SEWER AND TIGHTLINE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1 %. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 2. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE 6"DIA. PVC (ASTM D3034 MIN) . INSTALL STORM SEWER AND TIGHTLINE WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. MINIMUM SLOPE 1%. PROVIDE CLEANOUTS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS. 3. STENCIL CATCH BASIN LID WITH " DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO SOUND" ( 1/2" MIN LETTER SIZE) 4. INSTALL WATER SERVICE CONN AT STREET, WATER METER, & WATERLINE TIGHTLINE ALL CONNECTIONS WITH WATERTIGHT JOINTS TO LOCAL UTILITY DISTRICT STANDARD/ CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING STANDARD SPECIFICATION. 5. EMBED CLEANOUT CAP IN 16" X16" X12" CONRETE PAD 6,. VISUAL INSPECTION OF UTILITY TRENCHES & TIGHTLINES REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO BACKFILL OPERATIONS. 7. BACKFILL MATERIAL & COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CUTS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DIVISION DESIGN STDS. 8. FILLS PLACED ON SLOPES SHOULD BE TERRACED(BENCHED) AND KEYED INTO THE SLOPE. THE BENCHES SHOULD BE DEEP ENOUGH TO PRECLUDE SLIPPING OF THE FILL DOWN THE HILLSIDE AT THE INTERFACE OF THE EXISTING SOIL AND THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FILL. 9. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 (AASHTO M199) AND ASTM C890 UNO: ( SEE DETAILS 3/C1.5, 1 /C1.6, 2/C1.6, 3/C1.6 ) a. HAND HOLDS IN PRECAST EXTENSION RINGS SHALL HAVE 3" MIN CLEARANCE, STEPS OR LADDERS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6" MIN CLEARANCE. b. THE BOTTOM OF THE PRECAST CATCH BASIN MAY BE ROUNDED c. PRECAST BASES SHALL HAVE CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS WITH A WALL THICKNESS OF 2" MIN. KNOCKOUTS OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAMETER PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. MAX HOLE SIZE FOR 48" DIA CATCH BASIN IS 36". MIN CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS 8". d. FOR DETAILS SHOWING LADDER, STEPS, HANDHOLDS ETC. SEE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STD DWG 9-074 "CATCH BASIN DETAILS". e. SHEAR/CLEANOUT GATE SHALL BE ALUMINUM ALLOY ASTM B-26—ZG-32a OR CAST IRON ASTM A48 CLASS 30B AND JOINED TO TEE SECTION BY BOLTING THRU FLANGE, WELDING OR OTHER SECURE MEANS. MATING BETWEEN MOVING PARTS AND GASKETS PER WSDOT STD PLAN B-3. g. LIFT ROD SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED BY THE MFR WITH HANDLE EXTENDING TO WITHIN 1'-0" OF COVER AND ADJUSTABLE HOOK LOCK FASTENED TO FRAME OR UPPER HANDHOLD. h. ALL METAL PARTS & SURFACES MUST BE MADE OF CORROSION RESISTANT MATERIAL OR GALVANIZED. i. RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE CUT ROUND AND SMOOTH. j. WHERE CMP PIPE IS USED, NEOPRENE GASKETS ARE REQUIRED ® ALL PIPE JOINTS. k. THE RESTRICTOR/SEPARATOR SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM .060" ALUMINUM OR .064 ALUMINIZED STEEL OR .064 GALVANIZED (TREATMENT 1 ) STEEL PIPE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO M36, M196, M197 & M274. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE OF MATCHING MATERIAL SEE DETAIL FOR THICKNESS. I. PIPE SUPPORTS SHALL BE ANCHORED © 3'-0" OC MAX WITH 5/8"DIA STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR ANCHOR BOLTS WITH 2" EMBED IN WALL. m. THE OUTLET PIPE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CMP SEWER PIPE WITH A STANDARD COUPLING BAND. 9. SLOPE OF STORM DRAIN (SD) AND SANITARY SEWER (SS) TIGHTLINES SHALL BE OF UNIFORM GRADIENT BETWEEN THE INVERT ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE DWGS �l LEGEND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE @J � � O � � W ' +4 N s Shwt No: CL3 N ^' r N U •♦ J a tFA IN[ EL LI I` ROPERTYf. Q0 ORNER • � E 1 �' 2 .1 ' I 00 N ..0. . ry CO NE .. �► _. "•' IN 4 • �. I+.ram-,�.;,''�' �. `�;.,�. ': -. •� h•�-1 °� i� irk , •► ��S� �+a, .• PR PE TY LINI\55-V�) A LI N N c9c� t— do 0 1 IV f rciall" VAN © r4J,�� CAf� IRO E V/� TI 0 I M A H� i Q.� 1 11\\ ! LOC IbON j 1 it it q \ B \\ i .I� \\ \� I r , 1 , 1 PHASE I {{ I 1 ^ � t \ \� i (ocn z Pp 1 co N �I N -t In N 00 N N 0- N (D N N N. ry 11-8 5 8 u PR( PrRT CNNER I S , 0- 1 \ 0 . PARTIAL SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PROPOSED FINISH GRADES SHOWN AS SOLID, EXIST GRADES = WHERE DIFFERENT FROM PROPOSED GRADES ARE SHOWN DASHED o 2. HOUSE GRIDLINE INTERSECTIONS ARE LOCATED RELATIVE TO Z PROPERTY CORNERS,(WHERE THE LETTER PRIOR TO THE DIMENSION W INDICATES THE DIRECTION; IE. W=TRUE WEST...) THE REMAINING DIMENSIONS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM SHT SA2.1 RADIUS3. ALL FACE OFENSION RY ALLOUTS ARE TO TOP OF EXTERIOR PARTIAL SITE PLAN (FRONT) J SCALE: 1 "=10' 71 Q m Ofi LiI n Lu r-)I I I PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS REGION I I BENCH EXIST GRADE T� l KEY INTO NEW STRUCT _ FILL PER GEOTECH REJORT, ,; ' ' \1 w w wl z zl z � Q Q• w• m• ml of wl w � cn cn I of of cn c. I � � 1 EXISTING GRADE SHOWN _ DASHED THIS REGION _ PROPOSED FINISH GRADE - SHOWN SOLID THIS ------ REGION - - - - - BENCH EXIST GRADE TO - - - - - r KEY INTO NEW STRUCT I - - - _ ...... - - - - FILL PER GEOTECH REPORT- ---- I-•- •-�- - - - - - - - - - - EL 290 280 .... - - - - EL 270 -- -- -- -- -- EL 260 - - - - - - - -- EL 250 240 - - - -- EL 230 NVIt: Stt SFiI U"I.b YUK KVGKtKY tLtVAIIUNJ SITE SECTION A —A SEE SHT C1.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION SCALE: 1 "=10' w w wl z_ z_I z J J _I' V �1 �' M. HOUSE OUTLINE ml 0I PHASE II cwnl cwn w. w wl i �nl FA EXISTING GRADE SHOWN '""""""" 1 DASHED THIS REGION �- -- - REINF. CONC. RETAINING --- T-- - ---__ ------- WALL SEE SHT. SA2.1 -'' 1= _EL_ 55'-6"' PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ - ; FG EL 25 - -- --- --------- FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS ° - REGION FIG EL 250 0" � ��- � - - .... - - • I' BENCH EXIST GRADE TO KEY INTO NEW STRUCT FILL PER GEOTECH REPORT _ NOTE: SEE SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY SEE SHT C11.7 FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTIONONS SITE SECTION B—B SCALE: 1 "=10' EL 290 ----------------- 280 - - - - -- EL 270 -- - - - - - - EL 260 250 240 --- _- - - -- -- EL 230 PHASE I PHASE III EL 290 zI zl EXISTING GRADE SHOWN EL 290 DASHED THIS REGION HOUSE — d �d HOUSE OUTLINE ....... OU TLIN,E�,,,, v PHASE I - - EL 280 �I ml PROPOSED FINISH GRADE/ ....... EL 280 _ _. _ _. o w _.......................... FLOOR SHOWN SOLID THIS — — ..... ..... -- -- -- :.; ....... REGION ;. ----. � -- -- -- -- cn ---- 270 I I .. = EL 270 FUTURE REINF. CONC.— RETAINING WALL _ _ 1 1 REINF. CONE. RETAINING EXISTING GRADE SHOWN =- --- � — ...... — — — — — WALL SEE S�iT. SA2.1 -' --- --- — — — — — — 1 L�' ..... DASHED THIS REGION , '- -- --- -�-} -. _. _ -. _ _. _ - EL 260 __ ___ ___ ___ _. _ _. _ _ _ L 260 - - T FGEL2�5- � G L25'-�-- REINF. CONC. RETAINING L 255'-=V' ' - - - - - - - - - " =- - ' -- -- - --- - _ WALL SEE SHT SA2.1 ' . __ -0: FF. EL 251'-6" _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F L 250'-0" FF EL 251'-6" -- - - L-25 ' 2- . _ . ._._._._.� 250 EL 250 -- ----------. -- --- = 1 - - __. _. ----. BENCH EXIST GRADE TO __ _ _ _ _ _ KEY INTO NEW STRUCT _ _ _____ _ — — — — — — — — —' — — — — —' — —' — — — — — —' EL 240 FILL PER GEOTECH REPOR _._ _. _. _._ _ _ _ _. _ _. _. _ _ _ _EL 240 -- - - -- -- -- - --I-- L - - - - - - - - EL 230 EL 230 SITE SECTION D—D OSEE SHT C11.7 SHT C1.5 FOR ROCKERY FOR ROCKERY CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS SEOEESH SHT C1 SHT C1.5 7 FOR ROCOR ROCKERY KERY CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS SITE SECTION C—C SCALE: 1 "=10' SCALE: 1 "=10' ch as � � W i z Sheet ft: CIA 32'-9„ 91-2„ N N 34,-61) DRIVEWAY w 6'-37Y 5'-3„ 6,_37) w z w z w z w z Z, ' 0 0 wl 201 0„ �-- a �- a �-- •Q f- a C - - - -- -� - -------� ------------------------ -•----------------------- ry 2 -0 2 -0 5 -0 2 „ 0 .5 -0„ EL 274' EL 272' EL 270' EL 268' I- EL 266' _'- EL 264 EL 262' L EL 26 ' EL 260'_� q EL 258' EL 256' . EL 254' EL 252' w t-- co ui I)PPFR ROC;KFRY SCALE: 3/16"=V-0" 15'-1" � ?F"—`?" N N 14,_8„ to n 30,-3„ w w z J z J 5'- 4" 2 2 U U I— f— a a 18'-6" M :2 w w z z M :2 w w z z _1 _I 2 2 U U I— i— s Fps �. ROCKERY ELEV. NOTES: HORIZ DIMENSIONS GIVEN ARE APPROXIMATE. ROCKERIES CURVED IN PLAN HAVE BEEN STRAIGHTENED TO ASSIST IN DETERMINATION OF MATERIAL QUANTITIES. W U U) a' o � U STEEPER BATTER (1 44.8) OF ROCK FACE IN THIS REGION MIDDLE ROCKERY �� SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" A1'—Iq" -w' —1 1 " GC► ' : • A ��. ��. i .�. �.► .� alb/.( �► r w .` �.. �� .i ` �► Ii �� r .r �� . Ir �� r �� PAN 1l� Rip , • ` �`, , • `��,��,f 1 j Sri `'� �r Y( r�� C 0.� WK.AMR" �1 ,• ► - L l�'.► _ � 1 41 ran • • _ :.EL 244 �- FIN. GRADE BEL-J VARIES EL 264' EL 26 ' EL EL 258' EL 256' c EL 254' EL 252' 3/4" CHAMFER L N SLaPE 1 1/6i12 N SLOPE 3 16t:12 FG orf"� coz ry >QO ' I LiJt !, QI ol� 2'-67)0 5 IV GRASS STRIP -- z 5" SOG COORD L'j 4" ABC COMPACT REINF W/ STAMPED Q' TO 97% MAX DRY CONC. CONTRACTOR > DENSITY o' IQ� Q lw V)Cn Iw i� I� w CIL 2'-O" 2'-O„ 0:Y �--�- CL 3/4" CHAMFER 6i::12 i ;. . 1 6)$ r't~ o n" TY ! v t t �t /� tI I um l �� I 3@1'-0"J.. TYP. DRIVEWAY SECTION -TRANSVERSE Filename: Drivesec.dwg SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" Dwg Scale: 3/8"=1'-O" SIDEWALK ABV. OFFSET CATCH BASIN CENTERLINE AS READ SO THAT WEST EDGE OF GRATE ALIGNS W/ EAST EDGE OF SIDE- WALK CB 5 1 /2f" . I STAMPED CONC. DRIVEWAY LOWER ROCKERY r3 CATCH BASIN AND GRATE LOCATION - PLAN SCALE: 3/� 16"=1'-0" C1 5 SCALE: 3/8 =1 -0 Filename: CBPLAN.dw Dg „ STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA STA g Scale;3 /8 1 0 0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 1 +00 1 +25 1 +50 1 +63f 1 +75 2+00 JIz �I Q z10 ,I �I� lip I I I I I iw it Q i i i i i i i i QJI0 I! > ry z l I! I I `-- ----- ----•- --•---•---ry - `" I w I I SCA IFY 12" & RECOMPACT w (I o- TOWARD - --._._._._._.J._._.- --•-------'-•-1 ®9 MAX DRY DENSITY EL 240 � I ADDI STRUCT FILL FOR I I HOUSE ._ _ _r.._._-_._._.-._._.�--.-._._ ------------I ry wI I, I MIN COVER OVER INVERT I I i._._._._._._._._.�._._._.._._._._.-._.1 ---- ------------•-•+� -I--- --- -•- -- --- -.--- ---•- - I� I I _.1.--�_-- -� -- ------ ---------I _ _._._._ ._._.�.�._._.�._._._._._._,.................... � ............................-....... - - - ---------- --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ -----•-•-•------------.------------------•--- - ...... ...... ....... ------------ - - - - - - .-.-.-.-. {-----•-•---•--t - - -----• • j-----•----.-1--- ----._._._._._._ ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.'_._._.-._.-.-.-.-._._.-._._._._._._._.-.-._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.-.-._.-._.-._._._._.-._._._._.SL�PE._1� :. 2 ._ _ _ _ _—._._._--,-._._._._, - - - - - - - - - ._ _ _ .._ -I ._._._. � .._._. _ - - - -.-•-•-•-• - - - - - - - --- ----- - - - - - - - --- •-•------- - - - ._._._._._. ._._. ._ I.E.=218. �� I I _ _ _._._. I_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._..- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ .-•-..-•-•-•-.-•-•-.-.-.-•-•-•..- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _._._. _._._._ _._._._._._._._._._._._. _._.1._._._._._._ _._._. I.E. = 2 5 5 _._._._. ._._._I _._._.1._._._.� . _._ r._._._._._._�_._._._ _._._._._.J ® DIVE DQINN ._._. _.�._._._._.L._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.�._._._.4._._._._._.__._._._.S STA. E ._._._-i._._..j._._._.._._._.-. I 1_._._._.._._._._._.� _. _ _._._._._._._._._._._._._ _. �._._._._._._._ _._._ _._._._._._._._._. _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .................. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ E L 220 APPROX. SS INVERT�L Z1.6 b5' - - - _. I _ _. ._._. _ _ _�._._._I._._._.�._._._.�. ._._. I_._._._. ._._._._._._i - _ _._.r.. _._._. _._._._._._._.�I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.�._._._._._._._._._._..-•-• - -•-•.-.-•-.-.-•-•-•-•-.-.-.-.-.-.-•-•-.-.-..--.-.-.-.-•-.-•-.-.- -._._. ..._._. ._.-.-. i._._._._._._-._._.-._._._._._I . I --- .�._._. �._._._._._._.t._._._ } ._._._._._._I_._._._. ._._._._._.� __._.._._._._._._._._._.-._._._._._._._._._.�I_.-._._._._._._._.-._._._._._._._._._.-.-._._._._._._._.-.-.-.-._._._._._._._.-._._._._._._._._._.-._._.-.-.-._._.-._.-._._._._.-._.-._._._._.-.-.-._.-.-.-._.-._.-._._._.-.-.-.-.-._._._._._._._._.-.-.-.-.-._._._._._._.__._._._.-._._._._..r._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.�._._.r._._.-._._._--•-•-.-.- ._._._._._._.._._._._.� ._._._._._....... ...... ...... ;_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._.1._._._._._.__._._._._._._._._..-._._._._._._..-._._._._._.__I._._._..._._._._.-._._._._-_._._.-............ _I EL 210 — DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E—E FILENAME: DRLONGT2.DWG lename: 1627C15.DWG C1�5 @ SANITARY SEWER DWG. SCALE: 1"=10' N tt dh e t= �E=4 co vo w � O � � W 171 i 1t No: CL5 IS 11 al n(1 'IV -)A" f-I n NOTE: CONST. SHALL BE PER CATCH BASIN TYPE II, UNO CONTROL STRUCTURE SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" STA 25 STA 50 0 00 W cn z c-) ry I 1 z 7-0ci• Q Q :�i 0 >I nI , W p w >I cn w � of JI } I ~ ~ I c W W O - C( ISE DH( 0 rlol' PI )C a r B 'AL lJ /-1 ll v I \ L._ G /'1 I L LJ /� -) LL COURSE SAME AS GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING NOTE: SEE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN NOTES ON SHT. C1.3 FOR ADDL INFO nn"\ /n A» /' I fl CATCH BASIN., TYPE II SCALE: 1 "=1'-0" STA STA STA STA STA STA STA 0+75 1 +00 1 +.25 1 +.50 1 +59f 1 +75 2+00 z ®� SCARIFY 1 & RECOMPAC U 2 ' ® 95% MAXDRY DENSITY 1 RIM EL=226.3t C1.6 ADD STRU T FILL FOR C1.6 — RIM EL =2 6.9t MIN. COVE _._._._._._ . _. _ 218_ .25_._._._.}}�-- C� DIVE DO �. �. ._. _ _.— — SLOPE 1/8:12 _._. �._._._._. ._._. SLOPE 3' —._. _ — :t2.—._._.—•—'— _._._._._.—.—._. — — — —._._._.—.— — — — _.—._. — — — — _ — —P� �1 �L2.L• _ — — — — — — — —•— — ---- I —•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•— I. —•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•—•— I. —•—•— — — — —•—•—•— I. —•—•— -- APPROX. SD INVERT L 216.05' � �OU' � � � � � � • � .Q � � ...... � ...... � � � � � • � . (� CTRL LET— —� C.B. INLET ...... _ . _ ....... ...... ............. GRATE TO BE LOCKED DOWN W/ (2) 5/81)0 STAINLESS STEEL SOCKET HEAD CAP SCREWS rALTERNATE A TOP VIEW N � 3/4" NORMAL TO BAR 00, RAW 17/8 — SECTION B-B D N DIMENSIONS SECTION A —A APPROX. WEIGHT FRAME 170 LBS. GRATE 128 LBS. TOTAL 298 LBS. W1 & w2 t 1" Min. 1 3/4 Max. 1 3/4" 26" 1 5/8" 1 " Min. 1 3/4 Max. 1 1 /2" 21 " 2 3/4" D o It -� N � I 1'-10 i '2" CN j • •SECTION D—D NOTE: MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT FRAME AND GRATE FILENAME: GRATE.DWG SCALE: NTS DWG. SCALE: 1"=1'-0" (TOWARD -- - iHousE — , �—�— —� EL 240 I.E. = 2 5.5 — — — — — —•. _ . _ @ srn 1. 5s :_:_:_: EL 220 --- EL 210 go 'rn r4 c. ra C01 b .I" O Alm cn 4 ,> fOZ � o ci �€-� DRIVEWAY SITE SECTION E-E @ STORM DRAIN filename: 1627C16.DWG FILENAME: DRLONGIT.DWG DWG. SCALE: 1 "=10' sneer No: CL6 PROPOSED OR EXIST. GRADE SCALE: 3/4"=1'-O" G' G" KAInI SLOPE) 11 _ 6 T/PIPE BELOW - THIS LINE H-4_O» � .W z C X': t'I} i 8'-6" MIN EXTENT OF FILL OVERBUILD FOR FILL CONDITION (MAX SLOPE) 1 2 1 ,�' IMPERMEABLE CAP 4 DR TOP SOIL F FLAT SURFACE IF---------------- 1 % SLOPE r III= r r ' O 000 o0 O O r 3 O 0 O III O 00 00 = rl ,r o O o 0 o O 0 000 000 0 III 000 000000 I I= III :ABLE CAP �' 0 O 000 000 III= o SOIL /r � SURFACE J CQ0Co0 q- o 00o 0 = _I O 000 0 (- r r r r ' ocpoo�o Oo O000000 D 4 INCH CRUSHED r' K OR QUARRY PROPOSED OR , 00000 LLS (W/MAX 5% EXIST. GRADE 000 00 SING #200 SIEVE) �� 0000� 50 3LE CUT FACE ATIVE MATERIAL �.OMPACTED JCTURAL FILL 5 PERF OR SLOTTED AIN PIPE MIN 1 %-2% )PE TO OUTLET OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC IMPERMEABLE CAP OR TOP SOIL IF FLAT SURFACE 2 TO 4 INCH CRUSHED RO�'r< OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% P&SSING #200 SIEVE) STABLE CUT FACE AN,�NATIVE MATERIAL O:' COMPACTED 5 RUCTURAL FILL 6."P PERF OR SLOTTED DFjAIN PIPE MIN 1 %-2% SLOPE TO OUTLET �1 "O OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER ,.F.AAB R I C =1 I I=1 I I=1 11= N IB' C 1.7, 11 6 O T/PIPE BELOW-)� THIS LINE H-6 — 0�, SCALE: 3/4"=1'—O" TYP ,` 1 BATTER 4I STEEPER BATTER l @ MIDDLE ROCKERY � SEE SHT C1.5 FOR EXTENT 4,8�' oco ' PROPOSED OR EXIST. GRADE d- D' 6 T/PIPE BELOW THIS LINE H=8)—O" 0 �I ROCK ROCK WEIGHT RANGE AVERAGE LENGTH SIZE (POUNDS) * DIMENSION (INCHES) 1 MAN 50 — 200 LBS 12 — 18 INCHES 2 MAN 200 — 700 LBS 18 — 28 INCHES 3 MAN 700 — 2000 LBS 28 — 36 INCHES 4 MAN 2000 — 4000 LBS 36 — 48 INCHES 5 MAN 4000 — 6000 LBS 48 — 54 INCHES 6 MAN 6000 — 8000 LBS 54 — 60 INCHES * THE MINIMUM DENSITY OF THE ROCK SHALL BE 160PCF 2 TO 4 INCH CRUSHED ROCK OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% PASSING #200 SIEVE) STABLE CUT FACE IN NATIVE MATERIAL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL 6"0 PERF OR SLOTTED DRAIN PIPE MIN 1 %-2% SLOPE TO OUTLET 1 "0 OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC (MAX SLOPE) 2 IMPERMEABLE CAP OR TOP SOIL 1 % SLOPE IF FLAT SURFACE I =1 I I =11 i I- ::. 111= 000 00 0 00° OO OO OO 0 0 0 0 0 =1I III o o0 O 000 00 I= 00000000 0o O o 0 III 000000 0 —Iil 0o00o00 I H i- OOO _ O O III 0 o oC 0o01I- 0000 00000 0 0000 2 TO 4 INCH CRUSHED 000 O�o ROCK OR QUARRY SPALLS (W/MAX 5% O 00 O 00 PASSING #200 SIEVE) 00 0 0 0 00 000.0 00co0 000 o STABLE CUT FACE IN NATIVE MATERIAL 6"0 PERF OR SLOTTED DRAIN PIPE MIN 1 %-2% SLOPE TO OUTLET 1 "0 OR LESS WASHED GRAVEL WRAP GRAVEL IN MIRAFI FILTER ROCKERY NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE LATEST "STANDARD ROCK WALL CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES" AS PUT OUT BY THE ASSOCIATION OF ROCKERY CONTRACTORS WOODINVILLE,WA. (HEREAFTER CALLED THE "ARC GUI DELI NES")AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THOSE GUIDELINES SET FORTH IN THE STANDARD UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 2. ALL ROCK SHALL BE SOUND,ANGULAR,LEDGE ROCK THAT IS RESISTANT TO WEATHERING. THE LONGEST DIMENSION OF ANY INDIVIDUAL ROCK SHOULD NOT EXCEED 3 TIMES THE SHORTEST DIMENSION.ROCK SELECTION SHALL BE PER ARC GUIDELINES 3.01.13 3. QUARRY SOURCES SHALL HAVE TESTING PROGRAMS ACCORDING TO THE ARC GUIDELINES IN PLACE AND SUBMIT CURRENT GEOLOGIC AND TEST DATA TO THE CONTRACTOR. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE ROCK SIZES SET FORTH IN THE DRAWINGS AND SHALL ENSURE A DISTRIBUTION OF ROCK SIZES, WITH THE LARGEST ROCKS ON THE BOTTOM AND PROGRESSIVELY SMALLER ROCKS UP TO THE TOP. THE LONG DIRECTION OF THE ROCKS MUST EXTEND INTO THE SLOPE BEHIND THE ROCKERY (PERPENDICULAR TO THE WALL FACE). 5. THE FIRST COURSE(KEYWAY) SHALL BE PLACED ON FIRM UNYIELDING SOIL, WITH FULL CONTACT BETWEEN THE ROCK AND SOIL, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHAPING OF THE GROUND SURFACE TO RECEIVE THE FIRST COURSE OF ROCKS. THE BASE COURSE OF ROCKS MUST BE EMBEDDED INTO THIS FIRM SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES OR GREATER AS NOTED TO PROVIDE A SECURE -BASE -FOR THE ROCKERY. THE COMPETENCY OF THIS KEYWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE TESTED ACCORDING TO ARC GUIDELINE 3.01.10 6. ROCKERY COURSING SHALL BE PLACED IN A RUNNING BOND TYPE PATTERN TO LOCK INTO ROCKS OF ADJACENT COURSES, THERE SHALL BE NO CONTINUOUS JOINT PLANES IN THE HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL DIRECTION. EACH ROCK SHALL BEAR ON TWO OR MORE ROCKS BELOW IT WITH GOOD BEARING BETWEEN FLAT ROCK FACES (FLAT TO FLAT CONTACT). THE TOP SURFACE OF THE ROCK SHOULD SLOPE BACK TOWARDS THE CUT FACE AND AWAY FROM THE FACE OF THE WALL. 7. VOIDS GREATER THAN 6" BETWEEN ADJACENT ROCK FACES, WHERE NO CONTACT BETWEEN THE ROCKS EXISTS THROUGH THE THICKNESS OF THE WALL, SHALL BE CHINKED WITH A SMALLER PIECE OF ROCK. 8. A 1'—O" THICK SURFACE SEAL SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOP OF THE GRAVEL DRAINAGE BLANKET AND SLOPED AWAY FROM THE TOP OF THE WALL WHERE POSSIBLE. 9. ANY FILL BEHIND THE ROCKERY SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED AS EACH COURSE IS LAID UP. FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAX 10" LIFTS TO 95%MAX DRY DENSITY AT OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT PER ASTM D1557 WITH HAND OPERATED COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. 10. ROCKERIES CONSTRUCTED AGAINST FILL LESS THAN 8'-0" IN HEIGHT SHALL BE BUILT BY OVERBUILDING THE FILL AREA TO ACHIEVE MORE EFFICIENT COMPACTION AND A MORE COMPETENT FILL MASS. FILL COMPOSITION AND PLACEMENT COMPACTION SHALL BE PER GEOTECH REPORT (MIN 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAX. DRY DENSITY @ OPTIMUM WATER CONTENT PER ASTM D-1557) IN PLACE DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED AT RANDOM LOCATIONS WITHIN EACH LIFT TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE COMPACTION IS BEING ACHIEVED. 11. DRAIN TILE SHALL BE TIGHTLINED WITH POSITIVE GRADIENT AND DRAINED TO AN APPROVED POINT OF DISCHARGE PER THE CITY OF EDMONDS ENGINEERING DEPT.STANDARDS. 12. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SHALL BE RETAINED FOR SPECIAL GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION. ALL ROCKERIES CONSTRUCTED AGAINST CUTS OR FILLS 6'-0" AND OVER IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PERIODICALLY MONITORED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE ARC GUIDELINES AND SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. ON COMPLETION OF THE ROCK WALL THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CLIENT, THE ROCK WALL CONTRACTOR, AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS, COPIES OF THE ROCK WALL GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION REPORTS ALONG WITH A FINAL REPORT SUMMARIZING THE ROCK WALL CONSTRUCTION. THE ROCKERY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TIMELINE AND COORDINATE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, SO THAT THE OBSERVATIONS CAN BE SCHEDULED ACCORDINGLY. 13. ANY SLOPE EXISTING ABOVE A COMPLETED ROCKERY WALL SHALL BE COVERED WITH DEEP ROOTED, QUICK GROWING VEGETATION BY THE OWNER AS OUTLINED IN 3.01.6 OF THE ARC GUIDELINES. 14. INDICATES SIZE OF ROCK REQUIRED SEE TABLE ABOVE. NIL t_ N SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" C1 7 FABRIC SCALE: 3/4"=1'-0" name: 1627C17.DWG,,:; Sheet No: cil STREET FLEE: /1�10��- sue. Aginkma JUN 19 I_q97 1 I i LEGEND ss SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ❑ STORM DRAIN so STORM DRAIN MANHOLE + + 229 GS- + U73 + 236.4 GS + GS Q i:{s TREE CONIFER TREE + 220.3 ss' 32" Gs 5.9 C. TREE DECIDUOUS TREE / N 88.05'14" E 58.1 9' ' ----12---24.--------- + - -X x - CHAIN LINK FENCE X R-BAR,G-4 50 CB - ---- +GP - ❑ ❑ - WOW FENCE TOP= 223.84 %3 CB INV.E=220.97 1 TOP= 218.22 INV.S=220.79 1 BRICK RETAINING WALL INV.E=216.07• am RINV.S=215.65 224.8 � � " R 11E RETAINING WALL � / GS,6' LK FC ss PIPE " j 1 SD STORM PIPE ti + Lin w w WATER PIPE o Gs a Wo i UTILITY POLE ANCHOR GS2.I c UTILITY POLE ANCHOR TEM RY ILT EN 1 i ® WATER METER y OFF '12" ROM j WATER VALVE - PROP Y LII E S E +cs'9) ROCK WALL D E I" 1.2 B X WIRE STOCK FENCE • O Q GS GS l J \ 0 SSMH ss TOP= 2 06 2v.1 INV=209.2 s0 CL 9r cq�oN Ti- UFpF 21.H7 O Fp�oN� �S A 'pOp �SFo CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL B/C1.2B 327C12B.DWG + TO .12 INV=222.67 4 i ,�,.•�•''� •� 25,3.1 ��i f L7 •�},+"RI•:•DEEP DTCH 3' HOG IRE FC de + 2274 . + 227.3 s''�• 14 V +ma tj 245. GS-BRK.� �. GS A5 e TYP a 2 , 006 •�'• 8�6 - ,. � � N + 8 3 UO3C' ,•�.�'2�'1Q� �5 V 2'DE IITCH MP C L R I C .5 i + 2 �T Z �P- TYP GS- 1. % <.CCNC.VL 3' VIOE 2.5'ROCK VAL e • �`1 i 22D.7 q� GS CB TYPE II %/ (�, %`�' , ✓� `` TOP= 221.81 N INV.E=212.51 \ / �N' o - INV.W=212.36 INV.N=213.21 y 0, s s>. 31.3 _ S� S END,IXI'ROCK VALL to osph 2591 O 8.2 END W REM -Q1` 'O �\� + 231.2 0 - � GS O 9 �s, 27�L �,�� •� StiF 0 \ >7o ss . \ ti o9'r + 23217 s CL 15' A DR s I��2� CL T ss t9� 4.4 -V • D �% i� O � so FQ 7 \Apt ?�p3 �O CB \ SSBO �"/S TOP= 234. y6 , Z% W.INV=227.84 E.INV=228.64 nc�FA NE.INV=228.29's, �/IFS Q ss I os 1 ss pho�\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION' OP MOLL PROPERTY INCLUDED IN 8 1/2"X11" FORMAT IN SUBMITTAL "BASIS OF DESIGN"• W&A + �m TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES: 1. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (FILTER FABRIC SILT FENCE & & CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE) SHALL BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR +3GS 022.6 TO ANY SITE CLEARING OR CONSTRUCTION. THESE MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 2. ROCKERIES SHALL BE PLACED 'SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE EARTHWORK CONSTRUCTION. -------------- 3. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY BY THE Iii S'S +GS2,5 CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. ALL TEMPORARY CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. i o 4. THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN, ON THIS PLAN ARE THE 1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING G CONSTRUCTION THESE MEASURES MAY BE UPGRADED IF RECOMMENDED BY 1 THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.. 0 z F ! 5. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. c I 36 6. ANY CATCH BASINS COLLECTING RUNOFF FROM THE SITE, WHETHER � s t. ..•:. THEY ARE :ON OR OFF THE SITE SHALL :�:�p��...;..;:j � Q � •\ HAVE THEIR GRATES COVERED WITH FILTER FABRIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. 1z E T 1 T +• 3. +cs.e R TIE B z9 D 7. A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION G S I ON CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE ON THE OUTLINE OF MOLL JOBSITE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. PROPERTY IN BOLD ter• r 7 \ NEWLY GRADED OR 46.8 SETBACK LINE DISTURBED DISTURBED SIDE SLOPE lf 20 GAGE WIRE TIEBACKAS MOD +cs.3 r 6.. 4 .86 RRT L I 5' KIR C _ 0 G 5'HIX1 .BR\. A LE BEA CH P S'1'\ I� ♦ ' 1 :\ 6 ,•FAQ- t Z! 25 .441 •♦, fie' Q ` • 4 J NV C!R BdV H •\ \ �. ,ro ,� � 1 Q_ 2 + 263, 2 1 51+IX3'V.D qeL R GO , 26 ,00 \'♦ \ OL 3'H RR TIE VLL a•• •\ 1 , I= + 315.0 GS E CO V HST •` , `l• ; �, 256.05 V EN cl �'� SE DC❑ BLU6VH E HSE �� .'` '♦• \ , air G� e-I •♦ , \..\ � ti .e e 0 Gs GCS `' •�•��♦ L T � - 2l 01 ° \ 0 1 ti' . 0. 8 c s �e- � ♦ 1 IG: 57B� 1p o •`, 1 \a ♦• + GC� .B g ` FOP= 235. 9 N V= 232.9 N t Ul \�� o� 4 7 z Q O 7 52 rn l bo O N �I 1 •5 '0 + t�n6 r { c s D , T -; g a V .it Iv 2 .1 + 2299E.6 C, Gs o 4? Zrn?o o r C5 >< C� 2 a4�' v GSF O O ^jam CJ� • O v� �� U1 :� of N o A .94 ()� 5 69p 50,;L ' 125.62' ' ----- ----- ----------- i o1� O N 88'05'14 E > >?p�pA' . 0� ?qr ' I C S131 0 ^s s j IOP= 2�p CB TYPE II 49. INV= 49. sD TOP=251.83 INV.E=245.78 j INV.W=245.68 ss "•fiT1777, I � W + 77.3 O SN O S?. LNG 1 1 I •1 I 2X2 STAKE FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL WASHED ROCK 2"x4" DOUGL iQ FIR N I�III/I D I ►I NE - STAPLES OR WIRE 8' I RINGS (TYPICAL) (J FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL MIRAFI 10OX, OR EQUIVALENT 2"x2"x14 GA WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR EQUAL (( I BURY BOTTOM OF I I FILTER FABRIC v I I v 1 I I MATERIAL I I I _ TYPICAL CROSS SECTION V C1 2' - 6" MIN. L.I BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL ON VX13 TRENCH 2"x4" DOUBLAS FIR AT 4'0 C. ELEVATION NO-1 GRADE OR EOIV 1. THE SILT FENCE SHALL BE WRAPPED AROUND THE END STAKE A MINIMUM OF 1 1 /4 TIMES. 2. THE GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE SECURELY FASTENED TO THE STAKE WITH A MINIMUM OF 5 EVENLY SPACED WIDE CROWN STAPLES. 3. OVERLAP THE ENDS OF ROLLS BY A MINIMUM OF 6." 4. PLACE THE GEOTEXTILE TO THE UPHILL SIDE AND THE STAKE TO THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. FILTER FABRICA SILT' FENCE C1.2B SCALE; NTS EXISTING GROUND IpllW 411 MIN ATB 1' -O" MIN QUARRY SPALLS 7 EXISTING GROUND 50' MIN 50' MIN QUARRY SPALLS ATB N � PLAN EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP OR SITE ACCESS ROAD. 1• USE 4" TO 611 QUARRY SPALLS. MATERIAL WITH "FINES" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. 2• THE 50' MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE LENGTHENED AS NECESSARY TO INSURE MATERIAL IS NOT TRACKED INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C�.� SCALE. NTS N rTIN tt 64 O tmd 0 C� O 11 ==4 N Q,1 A. a i I Shoot Nos { C 11.2B i i p of - S F72 IbID N maiNkLid) MIMI 12,97 J! �j�(5�1G�1� �itih� T, , P-1, FE E - T '11,. F 4O ay cqT� of it / of h1pNn qS t C CH LK@ TE p1 090 bo �0 IN V. E= 245.78 INV.W=245.68 + 312.9 GS O N GaVne E + W56 GS 307.7 GS / S CALE 1" = 2 0' CONTOUR INTERVAL: 2' DATUM: CITY OF EDM❑NDS BASIS OF BEARINGS: RECORD OF SURVEY V. 32 P. 236 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 49 & 50 Meadowdole beach, recorded In Volume 5 of Plots. page 30, and Tract 50, Meadowdale Beach Supplemental Plot, recorded In Volume 5 of Plots, page 4Z Records of Snohomish County. ftehington. I LEGEND i ss SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE - - - -- ❑ STORM DRAIN So STORM DRAIN MANHOLE t-TREE CONIFER TREE C. TREE DECIDUOUS TREE —x--- x - CHAIN LINK FENCE --®-- o - WOOD FENCE ^ =- BRIM RETAINING WALL RR TIE RETAINING WALL SS SEWER PIPE —SD—STORM PIPE W - - W WATER PIPE -0- UTILITY POLE ANCHOR C UTILITY POLE ANCHOR ® WATER METER WATER VALVE ROCK FALL u -- WIRE STOCK FENCE NOTE: ELECTRONIC FILE AS RECEIVED FROM GROUP IV INC. THE ONLY ITEMS ADDED HAVE BEEN THIS NOTE AND THE TITLE BLOCK W4 o � y i I x �J o I 14 Ch W .2 04 0 ,~ 0 Z '82 filename: 1627C11.DWG � v ' r5" I y'� ter. Z66[ 6 T Nnr Dalalffff Ic�l�l 41. ✓wd��j STREET FILE ti