16208 72ND AVE W.PDF16208 72ND AVE W
ADDRESS: —vim 7v2IL6(
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: ez /
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER):
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA'
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: DcS— (��f LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #:
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
LATEMP\DS'Ps\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc
$70
/
S Pk W
ails
n
e0to
V
77087302
$ � a
r 3E
P
S 72i8 72tB 12 N o m
Q p _ q a
y� 72Q 7217 'i 7211 18000 75324
a 18a70 18410
m 1e742 tease
yyJ — s
.• p .; t6009 _ W
i 7IN0 AVE W 157/1
15516
?° r
fttB = Q 1 L'Wlet re? e
7105
7027 _ y ,��•Q,�S S '� - `dam id 7070
7017 FPS 'd'Ill
R �_ 7022 1 Y.. 7o2s
7103
m7007
� n �
A f r o OTH AV W
1577, 1 ('
6922
J_ _ • � � � 15727 �• �
egf• 891$
'SW
891 6909
tagoe
IG �i
a $ n !2 S 15920-
.. ...... ... fare .__.,., ....__,,.;..
LAJ
_,�
Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data
Pagel of 2
SnohomishOnlino Government Information & Services
County4O
Washiinitton
* R E AL * Property Information
County Home Assessor Home Treasurer Home Information on which Department to contact
Please view Disclaimer If you have questions, comments or suggestions, please Contact Us.
Date/Time:6/26/2006 10:14:24 AM Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about Parcel Data (opens as new window)
Return to Proper Information Entry page
Parcel Number 00513100006705 Prev Parcel Reference 51310000670506
View Map of this parcel (opens as new window)
General Information
Taxpayer Name II Address (contact the Treasurer if you have questions)
GREEN TARA INC 1116202 72ND AVE W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026
If the above mailing address is incorrect and you want to make a change, see the information on Name and
Address Changes
Owner Name 11 Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions)
GREEN TARA INC 1116202 72ND AVE W - - - EDMONDS, WA 98026
If the above name and address is incorrect due to a recent sale, please see the information on Name and
Address Changes After a Sale
Street (Situs) Address (contact the Assessor if you have questions)
UNKNOWN UNKNOWN ---
Parcel Legal Description
MEADOWDALE BEACH LOT 2 OF CITY OF EDM SP S-95-163 REC AFN9902035001 CORR
AF200205315007 BEING A PTN OF TRS 66 & 67 EXST PLAT TGW TR X
Go to top of page
Treasurer's Tax. Information
"Taxes For answers to questions about Taxes, please contact the Treasurer's office (opens as
new window)
2006 Taxes for this parcel $2,945.50
(Taxes may include Surface Water Management and/or State Forest Fire Patrol fees. LID charges, if any, are not
included.)
To obtain a duplicate tax statement, either download our Tax Statement Request form or call 425-388-3366 to
request it by phone.
Go to top of page
Assessor's Property Data Characteristics and Value Data below are for 2006 tax year.
Please contact the Treasurer's office for answers to questions about Taxes (opens as new window)
For questions ONLY about property characteristics or property values (NOT taxes),
please contact the Assessor's Office (opens as new window)
Property Values do not reflect adjustments made due to an exemption, such as a senior or disabled persons
Values exemption.
http://web5.co. snohomish. wa.us/propsys/Asr-Tr-PropInglPrpIngO2-ParcelData. asp?PN=00... 6/26/2006
Snohomish County, WA Assessor Parcel Data Page 2 of 2
Reductions for exemptions are made on the property tax bill.
Tax Year 2006 Market Land $293,000 Market Improvement $01 Market Total $293,000
Pending Property Values
Tax Year 2007 Market Land $395,000 Market Improvement $01 Market Total $395,000
Go to top of page
Property Characteristics
Tax Code Area (TCA) 00217 View Taxing Districts for this Parcel (opens as new window)
Use Code 910 Undeveloped (Vacant) Land
Size Basis ACRE Size 0.43 (Size may include undivided interest in common tracts and road parcels)
Go to top of page
Property Structures
No structures found for this parcel
Go to top of page
Property Sales since 7/31/1999
Explanation of Sales Information (opens as new window)
Sales data is based solely upon excise affidavits processed by the Assessor.
Transfer Receipt Sales Price Excise Deed Grantor (Seller) Grantee (Buyer) Other
Date Date Number Type Parcels
9/8/2000 9/19/2000 $164,650 159019 QC LEHN PHILLIP G & MARIAM A GREEN TARA INC No
9/8/2000 3/21/2005 $0 193609 QC LEHN PHILLIP G & MARIAM A GREEN TARA INC No
Go to top of page
Property Maps Township/Range/Section/Quarter, links to maps
Neighborhood 1504000 Explanation of Neighborhood Code (opens as new window)
Township 27 Range 04 Section 05 Quarter SW Find parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section
View Map of this parcel (opens as new window)11
http://web5.co. snohomish.wa.us/propsys/Asr-Tr-Propinq/PrpIngO2-ParcelData.asp?PN=00... 6/26/2006
Inc. 18913
March 30, 2004
a
CITY OF EDMONDS
G
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning • Building • Engineering
Philip Lehn
16202 72"d Avenue West
Edmonds, Washington 98026
RE: Proposed Meadowdale Changes & Future Request for Alternate Design
Dear Mr. Lehn:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
As a follow-up to our meeting with the Director last week, I wanted to clarify the City's position
regarding the proposed Meadowdale map changes and provide you a copy of the current
geotechnical report guidelines for Meadowdale development. As you are aware, the next public
hearing is scheduled for April 20, 2004 where public testimony and comment will be taken. I
hope you plan to attend.
Regarding the proposed changes to the Meadowdale Map, the additional buffer area that will be
considered by Council is an approximate number. The purpose of the buffer is to account for
original map inaccuracies since no topographic survey was completed to create the first map and
also to account for the last twenty years of erosion and slope failures. As you heard last week,
staff is recommending the more conservative 200 foot buffer. The City Council will however
make the final decision.
As you noted in our meeting, a portion of your property on Tract X and Lot 2 is currently
designated on the GeoEngineers map as being within the Meadowdale landslide hazard area and
thus already subject to Meadowdale (ECDC 19.05) permit review. At the meeting you provided
a map of your platted lots, showing an extended buffer of 200 feet; you understood that the
remaining platted lots (Lots 3 & 4) would be subject to (at a minimum) preliminary Meadowdale
permit applicability review if Council accepts the 200 foot buffer.
The concept for reviewing lots located within a mapped buffer area(s) would be to require a
geotechnical report and letter detailing geotechnical reasons why the lot development should not
be subject to the Meadowdale provisions.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
• 0
Mr. Lehn
March 30, 2004
Page Two
Upon receipt of the geotechnical report and letter, the building official reviews the materials and
makes a recommendation to the Director for waiver, partial waiver, full implementation or
partial implementation of Meadowdale provisions for development. The building official may
confer with a City consultant in making this recommendation. The Director then renders a
decision which is appealable to Snohomish County Superior Court.
As the Director stated, it is possible that one geotechnical report can adequately address
individual lots within a development provided enough individual development detail is provided.
Since you have indicated you already have a geotechnical report for your plat, the next step is to
check the report against the attached geotechnical guidelines to be sure the report is complete
based on the individual design of the future houses. If items are missing the engineer will be
required to supplement the report. Your engineer could also be considering at this time
geotechnical reasons why the upper most eastern lot pads of Lot 3 & 4, may be waived from
Meadowdale development provisions (in case the map buffer concept is adopted by Council).
Regarding green built dwellings, I have contemplated how your designs should be reviewed
subject to current UBC 104.2.8 Alternate Designs and Methods. For each green component (i.e.,
soil roof, structural panels, etc.) you shall be required to submit a formal request for alternate
design. Note, pursuant to the current UBC provisions, you must prove that the alternate is
equivalent to that prescribed in the code for suitability, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance,
durability, safety and sanitation. Evidence or proof must be submitted to substantiate any. claims
made regarding the components' use.
The current fee for each alternate design proposal is $180.00 plus cost of City Attorney time (if
required). As a reminder, the effective date for adoption of the International Codes is July 1,
2004. Any request for alternate design submitted after July 1, 2004 must adhere to International
Building Code Section 104.11 (copy enclosed). As the Director noted, you may submit your
requests for alternate design well in advance of permit application submittal in order to expedite
the future permit review process.
If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220.
Sincerely,
Jeannine L. Graf
Building Official
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT GUIDELINES
MINIMUM GUIDELINES FOR SITE INVESTIGATION, EVALUATION, ANALYSIS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS ON STABILIZING MEASURES FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The owner shall be responsible to submit a geotechnical report (herein report) that shall be prepared,
signed and stamped by a Civil Engineer (herein engineer) specializing in Geotechnical Engineering licensed
by the State of Washington. The report shall include an evaluation and analysis of soil and groundwater
conditions and shall be supported by field investigations and appropriate subsurface explorations. If the
evaluation involves geologic evaluations or interpretations, the report shall be reviewed and signed by a
qualified state licensed Geologist. A letter of concurrence from the geologist shall be included in the report.
If any requirement of ECDC Chapter 19.05 or Ordinance #2661 is determined to be irrelevant by the
engineer, the report shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. (ECDC
19.05.030B)
2. Reports shall address comments received from governmental agencies, and the public in general,
concerning geotechnical and other related aspects of the proposed project, as developed from the Critical
Areas Checklist, Environmental Checklist and general permit review process. The City may require such
supplements or amendments to the report as are needed to develop a reasonably comprehensive
understanding of the site soil and groundwater conditions. (ECDC 19.05.0308#2)
3. Within the mapped limits of the Meadowdale landslide area, a general discussion of the site, based on the
Roger Lowe Associates report of 10/16/79, and the 2/28/85 GeoEngineers supplement, without an
investigation including site specific explorations, is not sufficient. This requirement is based on the City's
understanding that soil and groundwater conditions can vary considerably over short distances within the
Meadowdale landslide area, and that these geologic"changes can significantly affect the design of structures.
Outside the mapped limits of the Meadowdale landslide area, the report.must provide subsurface data to
support the engineer's conclusions regarding slope stability. In such unmapped Earth Subsidence and
Landslide Hazard Areas the engineer must conclude that the site is stable, as defined by Ordinance #2661.
4. The report shall to UBC Chapter 18 and be site specific, based on the legal description of the permit
application, and include a scaled plot plan prepared prior to conducting any soils investigations. The plot
plan shall be included in the report and show all existing and proposed structures, utilities, floor grades,
excavation levels and grade contour lines. Exploration test pits and/or boring locations shall be clearly
identified. The discussion of the site shall include all findings and test data on the existing surface and
subsurface conditions, groundwater levels, soil engineering characteristics, capacities and. classifications;
including geology, soil/bedrock, stratigraphy. The report shall include an analysis of potential impacts on
surrounding adjacent properties with respect to these items. The report shall include all findings and test data
on site soil and groundwater conditions, including but not limited to: soil strength characteristics, soil
classification and density, unique landforms or landslide boundaries, and groundwater elevations (referenced
to a reproducible datum).
L;ump:bldgftmdoudMeadow/Md checkjlgREV12/02 Page 10
5. A vicinity map shall be included and shall show existing sewer and drainage facilities within 50 feet of
the site. The report shall include a discussion of proposed underground utilities, including recommendations
for the possible need of flexible connections at points of entry to the structures.
6. The report shall contain the engineer's opinions, conclusions, and recommendations on the present
stability of the site, stability during construction, and the anticipated stability after development is completed.
The engineer's opinion shall be stated in terms of degree of risk at each of the above stages of development
and the potential of damage to abutting properties. The engineer shall address all forms of earth movement,
including but not limited to: slumps, debris avalanches, earth flows, debris falls, mud flows, and/or deep
seated rotational or complex landslides. The issue of site stability shall be a focal point during all phases of
design and construction. The landslide history of the area and the landslide history and/or probability on the
specific site should be discussed.
7. At a minimum, provide one cross-section extending across the site drawn perpendicular to existing
contours. This cross-section shall show soil and groundwater conditions as identified by explorations and
shall show proposed structures(s) including proposed finished floor elevations superimposed on the cross-
section.
8. In order to assist the engineer in arriving at valid conclusions, and in order to properly evaluate the site
groundwater conditions it may be necessary to install piezometers. The location and number shall be
determined by the engineer or geologist and shall .be installed and abandoned per WAC Chapter 173-160.
. The readings from regular monitoring of the piezometers shall be plotted showing the groundwater level in
comparison to rainfall and also. in comparison to density of construction. By measuring, groundwater level
information can be developed indicating the impact of wet and dry seasons and the impact of development as
it effects the degree of risk for future slide or earth subsidence.. When piezometers are not installed, the
engineer or geologist must provide a description of groundwater conditions based on other criteria or
observations such as observed seepages in test pits or natural springs. If unusual odors, soil, surface water,
groundwater and/or debris suspected of being contaminated exists, the City and appropriate statelfederal
agencies shall be immediately notified.
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
The following specific provisions are also required in the report to address site specific issues and/or
constraints.
1. Site preparation, including recommendations for site clearing,. grubbing and excavation. Provide
recommendations for all temporary and permanent cut and fill slopes. Address protection of adjacent
properties.
2. For grading and earthwork include procedures for compaction and type of fill material required.
3. Specify the use of site soils for fill or backfill and shoring requirements during construction. Discuss
temporary cut slopes greater than 2:1 and excavations greater than eight (8) feet in depth for temporary
and permanent slope protection. Specifications must be provided for all types of fill anticipated for use
during the project, including but not limited to: general site fill, wall backfill and fill under footings and
floor slabs.
L;temp:bldg4umdout/Meadow/Md checkjlgREV12/02 Page 11
4. Based on the criteria in UBC Chapter 18 and requirements for Seismic Zone 3, the report shall include
recommendations and construction components for a site specific foundation plan. Soil bearing capacities,
and soil horizons capable of supporting foundations and/or slabs shall be called out. Recommendations shall
be made for provisions to minimize the effects of expansive soils, adjacent loads, and the expected total and
differential settlement. Submit calculations on the allowable foundation and lateral pressures to substantiate
the classification. For conventional foundations the degree of stiffness or strength of the structural
foundation must be called out. This could be provided in terms of the foundation being able to span a given
distance between any two support points or by use of other definitive criteria. Comment on the need, if any,
for tying isolated footings together in two directions to provide additional resistance to displacement in the
event of earth movement.
5. For the design of retaining walls, recommend values for passive and active pressures and coefficients of
friction. For pile foundations, explorations must extend to. at least the depth of recommended pile
penetration. Allowable axial and lateral loads on piles shall be determined by an accepted method and
calculations supporting these loads must be provided.
6. Temporary and permanent erosion control and other measures designed to reduce the risk of slope
instability must be addressed. Include the number and placement of drains, mode of construction (including
temporary slope angles and/or the need for shoring/trench boxes) and approved discharge locations. Specify
permanent site drainage and maintenance requirements. Note: These provisions . may require that the
engineer restrict construction, during certain times of the year.
7. Address the criteria called out in the critical areas and environmental checklist. All aspects of both
checklists shall be addressed and answered in the report. Discuss the need for the preservation and
maintenance or replanting of natural vegetation at the site, including trees and shrubs.
8. Provide recommendations for temporary shoring and/or requirements for obtaining temporary or
permanent slope easements on neighboring properties. Include measures for protection of adjacent public
and private utilities. Provisions in Chapter 296-155 .WAC Part N and Chapter 296-62 WAC Part M must be
incorporated where applicable.
L;".bldg/handout/Meadow/Md checkj4REVl2/02 Page 12
..J,
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www6edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT- SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Inc 18cj0 Planning • Building • Engineering
December 13, 2005
MEMO TO:
Edmonds School District
Verizon Northwest
SNOCOM Police and Fire Dispatch
SNOPAC
Snohomish County E911
U.S. Post Office
Snohomish County Assessor's Office
Snohomish County Information Services
Snohomish County P.U.D.
Puget Sound Energy
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
STgFFTFi`�
Edmonds Fire Department
Edmonds Police Department
Edmonds Utility Billing
Edmonds Public Works
Edmonds Building/Street File
Edmonds Address Files
Lynnwood Disposal
Comcast Cable
Waste Management Northwest
Please be advised that the attached_ addresses have been added to the Edmonds address
system: New 16206 (lot 2-A) and 16208 (lot 2-B) 72°d Ave W. Configured with common
areas around a detention pond lots X-A and X-B (not addressed).
Occupancy: R3 Tax ID Number: 00513100006705
Subdivision: S-20(664 Lot #'s: 2-A and 2-B, with
common areas X-A and X-B
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or
Umbaugh@ci.edmonds.wa.us. Please contact me if you wish to be removed from this list.
Respectfully,
Theresa mbaugh
Permit Coordinator
Edmonds Building Department
L\Temp\DST's\Master Letters\New Address12/13/2005
• Incorporated August 11, 1890 •
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
uo o a
Jp, r"l LW
� O
g zi P 16010
3
s PL W
_
7308 1610
G,p3 � N
10. _ I
7not 7 _
N N
N UI
7218 7218
7212 7213 �i 7211 16330 °i °' o $ 15524 C
m N
P $ 18a30 18470 18342 78309 °' ,5614
'
W 18009 _ -
72NO AVE /W �-s��� ss,s
7119 a .'71 LW re�e / P
V
J�
7o3o
7027
7022 $ 7025
♦Q N_ yy
7017 7108 • "1
ii ?f m P a .71 e i i• yL I f003
15708 3
o . S j .e qi u• � ;
P �
4 c 70TH AV W J C
1Sf31
8922 572] u
` Jy g ,sf1B
8814 seas 1 S8910
8909
906
920
I+ORTHFAST CORNER TRACT 67 ROW ROW
FOUND RE -BAR & CAP IN DRIVEWAY 20 25'
W/LS NO. 16.230
(MICHAEL S. WEBB) SET FOR RECORDED \�
SURVEY FOR JOHIJ JOHNSON IN 1988
TRACT 57 TREE COVER
TRACT 52 BOOK 26 OF SURVE'+S AT PAGE 214
AND ACCEPTED FO�,CORN i \Y
M1 ^ ry J�£P SL4'E +TOP 25.01
S' \
U-
APPROX. LOCATIO l a2 N00' '" "':"`^.`� •- :'
4 tUR,..., /J
OF CRACK A = 873 F �' �_., S$ �' .t :S.Ob .«b• /. •'• o\
\ SETS F / �25 2• ✓ \ o
L
R06ABIL y 6&I
\H ARD LIN RA £ !2 ?.: .. `.•.\\
� / �I'=sfi-qc�m raas�23"38 iroR � &,i� \1\'• �
TREE COVER
DE TEN TIO
TANK
PROPOSED \ S% % �--PQ�QTtON J z
PROPERTY LINELo
'G i b a OPE TOE '. 3 ,< 1 1 ��
/ \ APPROX. LOCATION j/ S� 1 `5%� ->1 `i
\ OF 2-13-98 LANDSLIDE • o ,+ i ` C _
TENT a r+86 108' T56,27 n 4t3 ....i :r1•fTA(.J }jj + `\ W W Z
�0 N e
P ION Of >' 1 ` — o
RE92.SF'.
A 5 �I f! 5 I au3
_ o col r/ •t� 1- a o a
TRA ,T 56 S-o z� 1 1 va
05. \ J+2 - ! - +S5"/5 .g. ro +f j r�%+ � N pI
`..� \\ 5.. -�i1
,n `\ . " \ i? Hay . ! �• F.
PROBAB7LTIY / '/ !gqj�• I n Ow
O[..HAZARD N/ \ 16 20
j' j7"rIJJJ: ' I I N N m 3
\S89'37'O0 W 1855S TOTAL
A -
REB R UNDER CEDAR o
12 } t I
3
A H MERIDIAN
1
PLAT 0F ME DOWDAEE BEACH `
;e r'-� S89'37 00'W t 33 54' ' 2 1 W
,t • 20' . 40' 80 �120 0 0 T
-r RIH rJ THE SOUTH ti F
J I F 1 0 00 0 LINE O E SO I Q
N = 30' OF TRACT 67 o Q
a
Z
LEGEND I CV
.1^
3!
O FOUND RE -BAR AND CAP ,LIRVE YOR'; C1ERTIFICATE . pF �S
SET BY MEYRING AND ASSOCIATES IN o w RMIr L
1971 AND ACCEPTED FOR CORNER. THIS MAP CORRECTL', REPRESENTS A BOUNDAR( AND TOPOGRAPHIC CI�
0 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE SURVEY MADE FOR THE ORIGINAL GREENNESS SHORT PLAT ON o N \
12-27=95. THE ORIGINAL BOUNDARY SURVEN WAS SUBSEQUENTLY `c) w
VISITED 12-5-95 z U o
REVISED ON 5-30-02 TO AMEND ITS DEDICATIONS AND AGAIN ON Ana
3-21-03 FOR .THE GREENNESS SHORT PLAT BOUNDARY LINE a 10
ADJUSTMENT. THE CURRENT BOUNDARY SURVE+' WAS PREPARED ON-
BSL BUIDING SETBACK LINE 3-15-05 FOR THE SHORT PLAT OF LOT 2 ALL OF THE SURVEYS 3w0
STEEP SLOPE TOP & TOE — — LISTED ABOVE WERE MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN % Y _"
CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING oo m ACT AT THE REQUEST OF GREEN TARA INCORPORATED } 03