Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
16310 75TH PL SW.PDF
16310 75TH PL SW Z,4-SLHA 2 1 9_ # ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: `/� e ���� 4610 uizE f/bo BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): / 9 �%�rJ LY COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: G� r4�1/� /C� rgy , ��DZ/ / 6r��7 �g�d CRITICAL AREAS: 7 L2 �l� DETERMINATION Xonditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: / PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: �n EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: ah; -O8 3OGr Z 3o296 , C1 u rCirg��J �9os�a��s� PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMITS) SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: VOW 0� (� (C�/� &N�4 AWIT LID #: 0) V BLOCK: L:\TEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc CITY of EDMq#DS Siffl" E E T FLLWIE SEWER P,.;A11flT For Inspection Call 771-3202 PERMIT NO. Address of Construction: -_ Property Legal Description ( Include all easements) : /o,-s .5 P«i 4V4eleWel A Owner and/or Builder: ( ngn t, A � ,fir 7— Cc k)4 Contractor & License No: G5n T) me /q:6 Single Family Residence Multi -Family (No. of Units ) rrI.�-Y-.N'NWOOD LANE Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEA E READ THE 9_u ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK E C IV S_- .ED eerti', that I have read and shall comply PUBLIC WORKS Date with t e items listed on the back. Permit Fee: -156) L/O Issued By: /"-2 S-- w /r�yy Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: VT Date Initial oRejected: Reason Date Initial -v a ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE > ** a� White Copy - File Green Copy -•'Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant 0 0 J 1 00 1 IF- 1 F!,:�71 � G � o a m m v 1 L ra i T PERMIT 890256 CITY OF EDMOrIDSZd NUMBER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATOWNER NAM..- NAME OF BUSINESS ✓`/niter m I U- CRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVIyIUN ND, LID NO.MAILING AOMESS/O} 0 ��GHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER APPROVED BY / E><ISTINGEOUIREDDEDICATION�/O_._ L //L A. /iJ/. n /T L, J / `l 7 - 7/ 7 .y PROPOSE) /7r('1 4eL lX DERSGN AGOG �JM R / CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER a //Os 7711 - 0 3'3c7 S/.j�/ Co'ranors Bn7U/m ADDRESS CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property - include all easements (show below or attach two copies) 4O>3 54t6 O/us ilwoAIS--4cmi A A/ LEI NEW /-� RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING OADDIALTER COMMERCIAL O MECHANICAL OREPAIR APT. BLDG. LJ SIGN DEMOLISH REMODEL OR EXCAVATE FILL GARAGIET FENCE ❑ I NCE Y_FT) O SQL D WO INS ERT G WALL/ O ROCKERY O RENEWAL NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER C DWELLING TV A it UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLC RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REOUIREDIf(,- STREET IISEPERMIT REOUIRED SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATE p REVIEW By SIGN AREA I ENV. REVIEW A08 NO. ALLOWED I PROPOSED COMPLETE I EXEMPT VARIANCE OR CU PUNNING REVIE BY DATE ' 1 _L' SETBACKS --cFEET �r .�r REIGN LOT COVERAGE i FRONT 2 7 SIDE/O SZ3 REAR Gl , 2 3S-07k? F/-640wb )SY R. Muee- &, 4 A-Affw PE Sual-rwAL DFxg CHECKED CAKED BY TYPE OSTRUCTI N CppE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY RE UIRED GROUP Y YES NO REMARKS v PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 it u, 71"44I / Zf-Wz OEQ /9A61. /, 4 EJt r16! 'SQ6uAl- (WSFE.ct1oNS Pew cu - �n L PUN CHECK'EE BUILDING /_y��0 j•� ,�,,/ d' �J /��f1� '� ,��L' „r' PLUMBING /Q v MECHANICAL This Permit COve•NS/lwork to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sld.-Plke, GRADINGIFILL driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE I HEIGHT� ' OCCUPANT LOAD i.o5 sr.. Permit Application: 180 Days ;. mit Limit: 1 Year- Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days ENERGY CDC= r' "Applicant. on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ccessors in interest, agrees to irdemnily, defend and hold rmless the City of Edmonds, `Washington, its officials. ployees, and agents from any and all claims for damagesofv�atever s! nature, arising dUecNy or indirectly from the issuancethis permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLA'• CHECK DEPOSITodify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance -r limit In any way the City's ability to enforce anyO:tlinanceovision." TOiAL AMOUNT DUEereby acknowledge that I have read this application: that thermation given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly orizetl agent of the owner. t agree to comply with city and ATTENTIONAPPLICATION APPROVAL` laws regulating construction, and in doing the work gut honz• THg PERM]* T 11 P,1"I This application is•not a permit until hRIZ ereby, no person will be employed in violation of tt1R labor B Of the Sr3tc cf Washington relating to Workmen's Comr:ensa• oILv THE WORK NOTEDDeputy; signed by the Building Ofliclal .or;his and fees are paid, antl receipt IsInsurance. _ uN nG Er+!, �AiE SIC:+CU u4PECTIONacknowledged DEPART.E•IT In space provided.,uHy+OW ''///' ' L % �J •� �,7• r J • CITY r•F' EDMONDS �' YFICALASIGNAATURE DATE 1.Q.lA/R7�- S • Zq.PJ ATTEP•iTION IT IG 771-3202 REL, nE, Y:, D TE / UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC ORIGINAL - File YELLOW - Inspe or CHAPTER J. 10D8T PINK - Owner GOLD - Asse Dr =, � STREET FILE � City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: Clyde Miller Determination #: CA-93-78 Project Name: I I Permit Number: F- I Site Location: 16310 75th Pl. W. Property Tax Acct #: 5131-060-005-0000 Project Description: Fence Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): XX There will be no alteration of the Critical Area or its required buffers; XX The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX The development proposal meets the minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; XX The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: The application for the fence is waived from critical areas studies. Any future development of any kind must following the following conditions: 1. The applicant must comply with any requirements the Building Official might call for because of construction on steep slopes (ECDC title 19.05, 19.00-UBC chapter 70). 2. The applicant must follow the requirements of the Engineering Division for erosion control (ECDC title 18). Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. John Bissell Name Signature ,Date 4 6 9 a - 199v City of Edmonds Critical Areas Checklist The QitiMI Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available frown observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checldist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the chccldist, make a precursory site.visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development Permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject pareel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or sttidies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site - I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided -are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner/ Applicant: Applicant Representative: Name Name Title Title 14310 7s`j,z. Street Address Street Address D 1 t �t. �7 S i S�G:cG 7v2. /e/4 City, State, ZIP Phone City, State, ZIP -e; 3 / Si nature Date Signature Phone Date Site Information . Project Name: Critical Areas Checklist Permit Number Site Location: 16 3 / o *7S P-e . -,/, Property Tax Account Number.. s I3 Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? X 0 General Site Conditions RECEIVED i MAR 3 1 1993 PERMIT COUNTER 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? X _ S Date of most recent action: / 9 8" — 3> Soils / Topography Lllt/Zv�dCV cUtRC-''1`�Cf�AdtLL 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? >,?i✓oy 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) Hilly: 'slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30°/p ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) _Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments Hydrology/Vegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water. A/ 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. YV 6 Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in the floodway _ ` e' floodplain ZU 0 of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? A16 flows - are year-round? Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is primarily: forested : meadow ;shrubs. ; mixed 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: Rev 3127192 • ;V Geo p Engineers MU TE Mr. Bud J. Leufkens P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Dear Mr. Leufkens: September 20, 1988 Report Geotechnical Consultation Residential Site 16300 Block, 75th Place West Meadowdale. Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations relative to development of a residential site in the Meadowdale area of .Edmonds, Washington. The property is located in the 16300 block of 75th Place . West. Our services for this project are provided in general accordance with our agreement dated August 5, 1988; our work was authorized by you on August 8, 1988. The site is located west of 75th Place West, between that street and the Burlington Northern railroad right—of—way which parallels the shoreline of Puget.Sound in this area. It includes Lots 5 and 6 of Block 60 of the plat of Meadowdale Beach and is shown in Figure 1. We under stand that you are considering selling the property and that .you need information regarding geotechnical conditions that may influence resi- dential development of the site. GeoEnoneers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 '�Y •.$ aA - c;s S '� 7 �(S _.•.1. ... �(yz, :.t.T -;�h,. :r.. �3,+�)+"��3"lP,!'�. `?�`-. Geo d�Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 2 The purpose of our work is to provide you with information regarding geotechnical conditions at the site pertinent to residential development in accordance with City of Edmonds Building Department requirements. Specifically, our work includes: 1. Exploration of shallow subsurface conditions at the site by means of test pits. 2. Review of information pertaining to past landslides which may influence development plans for the site. 3. Evaluation of the stability of the soils at the site in accordance with the criteria required by the City of Edmonds. 4. General recommendations for site development, including site grading, foundation support, site drainage and erosion controls. Our work has been performed on the basis of a review of existing information, surface reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas, observations of water levels in nearby ground water monitoring wells, exploration of subsurface conditions at the site by means of four test pits excavated using a tractor -mounted backhoe, and our experience. We have utilized a topographic map of the site prepared by Group Four, Inc., and dated August 30, 1988. Assumptions regarding the location and construction of the proposed residence are based on discussions with you . and Mr. Clyde Miller. No specific building plans have been developed at the time of our study. A site evaluation checklist relating this report to the requirements of UBC 2905 is attached as Appendix A. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is located downslope of 75th Place West, between that street and the Burlington Northern right-of-way along the Puget Sound shoreline. The property slopes moderately downward to the west, ranging from approximately Elevation 80 along 75th Place West to approximately Elevation 40 along the railroad right-of-way boundary. The ground surface within the site generally slopes downward to the west-northwest at an a. .. � rY �f..'P. �) ��. �♦ -'`,a•+�[i��'!4r la.t`q'aE'id_�'I\`Y�s Pryer..�.���Yl`��t;lJt'1�'.>r'$Y.C"YJ/J$��he'n�.'.N�j�.�^!`{1Y � -i fat y;.i� •��s. � �?v. :f' .. .. Geo��Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 3 inclination of approximately 20 percent, except along the shoulder of 75th Place West where it locally slopes approximately 30 percent for a few feet in height (see Figure 1). A relatively level, regraded area near the northwest corner of the property is bounded on the east by a roughly 4-foot-high, west -facing cut. A steep (approximately 1.5H:1V) west -facing slope approximately 15 to 20 feet high along the west property boundary separates the site from the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. There are no buildings or other improvements on .the lot at this time. Most of the site is presently vegetated by grass, with a number of small deciduous trees in the eastern portion of the property. Brush is present mainly near the top of the cut slope in the northwest portion of the property and along an abandoned drainageway that traverses the property from east to west. The ground surface throughout the site was dry at the time, of our surface reconnaissance and subsurface explorations; no evidence of recent surface water runoff was observed within the drain- ageway. The proposed single family residence will be located near the southwest corner of the site, at the approximate location shown in Figure 1. The residence will be of wood frame construction with a daylight basement. The lowest floor will be at approximately Elevation 46 and an approximately 10- to 12-foot cut will be required along the east wall of the building. We understand that the actual location of the proposed residence may be adjusted slightly to accommodate final design. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating four test pits using a tractor -mounted backhoe. A representative from our firm observed the excavations and classified the soils encountered. The logs of the test pits are shown -in Figure 2. Subsurface conditions at the site generally consist of 3 to 5 feet of brown silty sand and sandy silt, overlying stiff gray silt. The upper 3 feet of the brown silty sand and sandy silt is generally loose or soft. The underlying gray silt increases, in hardness with depth. No ground water seepage was observed in .any of the test pits. - ♦9. c , - {. ,e t v::�'�"f r�G��'.¢7 '" `}.i K� :`�w -s.. +• eyy�;:5 'z � r .R�-•,;{ 4:.� .'i r � ro ... - Geot%l Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 4 HISTORY The site is located within the Meadowdale landslide complex, an area in which large and small earth movements have been documented in the last 40 years, and in which movement has undoubtedly been occurring for many centuries. This area is the subject of a landslide hazards report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. (Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investiga— tion, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, dated October 16, 1979); two of the undersigned were the authors of that report. The site which is the subject of this consultation is located in an area classified in 'the 1979 RLAI report as 114A9011. This designation identifies a landslide hazard from movement of previously failed material, indicates that the failure would likely include a considerable depth of material, and that there was a 90 percent probability of such a failure occurring during a 25—year period. A landslide encompassing the subject property is known to have occurred during the winter of 1946-47. This movement involved an area extending from approximately 220 feet south to approximately 500 feet north of the subject site. The headscarp was located approximately 400 feet east of the Burlington Northern tracks. The 1979 landslide hazards map was developed on the basis of conditions that existed prior to construction of the Meadowdale sewer and storm drainage project. The relative landslide hazard was reevaluated in 1985 by our firm and we concluded that the conditions which exist today are less hazardous, due primarily to a declining water table resulting from installation of storm and sanitary sewer. However, some risk of landsliding still exists. We concluded that in 1985 the risk of land — sliding, as classified in the RLAI report, had been reduced to an approxi— mate 30 percent probability of failure in a 25—year period. Observations of ground water levels in nearby monitoring wells during the course of this consultation confirm that the water table in the vicinity of the site has declined to levels commensurate with this lower risk. 771 • (. ' -.�A �s�"l cg' _S. YZ � b.. �'�w f�'}7' }�i�t.�4�'":1Y1��•:NLwiS t-� !`l.]`S�,R.vi�r=..Yi�V�.vY �� . . .t .. G:eOmEnoneers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMM=ATIONS GENERAL . In our opinion, the site can be 'developed for a residence provided adequate care and practice in the design and construction of drainage, earthwork, structural walls and foundations are employed. These measures will make the site more expensive to develop than for a similar house on a lot without the conditions and history of. earth movements that occur at the site. Construction in accordance with the recommendations provided below will not reduce the. stability of the site or adjacent areas during or following site development. The material that underlies the site has previously failed in at least one large—scale landslide. The risk of reoccurrence of such a landslide has been reduced due to a declining water table in the area. This water table decline has been caused, at least in part, by implementa— tion of a storm and sanitary sewer system. The risk reduction will remain effective as long as the overall storm and sanitary drainage system is operational. The risk level may, in fact, continue to decline, becoming more prevalent as development progresses with more efficient drainage measures. The recommendations in this report are directed toward avoiding localized slope stability problems and minimizing damage to the proposed residence in the event that significant movements occur. We recommend that footings for the residence be set back at least. 25 feet from the top of slope indicated along the west property boundary. This setback provides a margin of relatively level ground adjacent to the residence and provides distance between the house and any minor debris slides that may occur along the steep slope within the Burlington Northern railroad right—of—way. No fill should be placed within 10 feet of the existing top of slope. Site grading should not result in the ground surface being raised or lowered more than 3 feet from existing elevations except within the foundation area of the house. • GeAQ�Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 6 SITS DRAINAGE No springs or surface water drainage appears to presently occur within the site. The abandoned drainageway indicated on the plot plan appears not to have carried surface water in recent years. The storm drain that previously crossed beneath 75th Place West and emptied into the head of the drainageway appears to have been truncated during construction of the sanitary sewer along 75th Place West. Surface water runoff generated within the site from roof, and other impervious surfaces must be collected and conducted via a tightline off the site to the west so as to 'pass beneath the Burlington Northern railroad tracks via the existing culvert. If a tightline is constructed down the slope, it must be designed and constructed to accommodate some surficial movements without danger of pulling apart or rupturing. Ground water was not encountered in our test pits and is not expected to be present in sufficient quantity to require a. system of subsurface drains other than the footing drains recommended below in conjunction with subsurface walls. Water from the footing drains must be conducted offsite in a tightline as noted above. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK The surface soils within the site contain substantial silt and are moisture -sensitive. These soils will absorb moisture during wet weather and, when wet, are easily disturbed during construction and difficult or impossible to compact. We therefore recommend that site grading and earthwork be done only during periods of dry weather. Site preparation for the building and paved areas should include stripping the surface soil and removing any organic soil. The excavated soil should not be stored, even temporarily, in the zone between the house and the crest of the steep western bank. After stripping and. any excavation, soft areas should be recompacted or excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. .. ..... .. _ .. .... - ' �, _• p ?-.fi i 4�n�e 's• 'f` �_'.�a_S :; _ i+ �;i�tS �a,'r- ��i ;..%'� ... � ,,.r.._ —� _._.___....._ • Geo Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 7 The soils within the upland portion of the site have a high potential for erosion during construction where the soils are disturbed by con- struction activities. This applies particularly to temporary or permanent fill. Erosion controls will be necessary and should include the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt revegetation. Erosion control measures should be in place around the perimeter of the site prior to any other earthwork on site. Prior to placing any structural fill, all vegetation and topsoil should be removed. Exposed surface should then be compacted. to a firm, nonyielding condition. Where fill is placed on an existing slope, the fill should be keyed. in by cutting level benches so that the contact between the fill and existing ground is horizontal. Any structural fill placed on the site should be placed in level lifts not more than 12 inches in loose thickness, properly conditioned and compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density in accordance with the ASTM D-1557 method, unless otherwise specified below.. All structural fill should be free of debris and organic contam- inants. The suitability of material for use as fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes. in moisture content and adequate com- paction becomes more difficult to achieve. We recommend that structural_ fill for placement in wet weather consist of free -draining sand and gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines. Material with more fines may be used during dry weather. Areas receiving nonstructural fill for lawns or landscaping should be cleared of vegetation and soft areas compacted to a firm condition by rolling. Nonstructural fill should be placed in level lifts not more than 12 inches thick and compacted to a dense condition. The fill surface should be sloped to drain efficiently. ,.'ia�-"�.'..�'':.. ` .: „iPa',`�.'�• .p a�",v a:. .. �Y. .Yui'sJ�rt!&�5. 5.':7 ti�:lt���1�:?�!x't�"?„:�5: Ca.�?"`�1�, i -.... - - - - , 0 Geo �� Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 8 FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that structural design of the foundation consider the possibility that future ground movement may occur. This movement could consist of an irregular subsidence of the ground and/or differential downslope movement. To accommodate possible ground movement, we recommend that continuous spread footings be of sufficient stiffness to allow loss of support over a horizontal distance of 20 feet with minimal deflection, and that the foundation design allow for loss of support at any one isolated spread footing. The design should be such that releveling can be accomplished if necessary. Alternatively, protection of the house against potential future damage by ground movement can be accomplished by designing the entire house and foundation system as a "rigid box." This design concept would permit rotation or displacement of the entire structure without sustaining structural damage. This technique would require substantial bracing and stiffening of the structure and, in our opinion, might not be cost— effective. We recommend that the house be supported on spread footings founded directly on the stiff gray silt that underlies the site, or on structural. fill supported by the stiff gray silt. If structural fill is used beneath the footings, it should extend a distance on each side of the footing, equal to the depth of fill. All structural fill should be placed and compacted as specified above. The minimum depth of embedment for all footings should be 18 inches below the nearest adjacent exterior grade. We recommend minimum footing widths of 18 inches and 24 inches for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. For foundations designed and constructed as recommended, an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used. For retaining walls, an average bearing value of 2000 psf may be used and maximum edge pressures should be below 3000 psf. This value applies to the total of dead and long—term live loads exclusive of the weight. of the footings and any overlying N y^ a�i .4�st w r nS•y� it 5 r . ... v<i. �:....• . x .. �.. . ...aa�t.ur'Y.K 3u.:?�,i:�� Di::{.gw7 3.'hc.ti'.r `L^:N:�a?ac.<f.3. 5�..'t 3C::•Sl.u�'ina..:� <. •Ti 1:. T`''. •; ., ,... ... .. Geo91.1 neers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 9 backfill. We estimate that footing settlements resulting from structural loads will be less than 1/2 inch, total and differential. RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and should be designed as such. For design of semi —rigid retaining walls at the site (i.e., basement.walls), we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 20 percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 65 pcf should be used. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free —draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting struc— tural elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 5 feet of the retaining walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth —wall, 4—inch—diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe bedded in pea gravel. The pea gravel should extend a minimum of 6 inches below and above the pipe. The drainpipe should discharge into tightlines and be disposed of as described under "SITE DRAINAGE." Roof drains or other collected surface water runoff should not discharge into the subsurface drains, but could be collected and routed into the tight discharge lines. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction on the base of the footing and by passive resistance on the face of the footings. Frictional resistance can. be determined using 0.5 for the coefficient of friction. Passive resistance may be determined using an equivalent fluid pressure of 325 pcf, providing the backfill surface is level and footings are poured ..._.... .-...._ "' __ _,_.,...G,,.. _„�r....�,..... ._„,,,� , _--�r�.��...��,.nrS--ram.-s.a--•- :—�'-- ._--_� _. GeoGOIEngineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 10 neat against native soil. The above values are based on a factor of safety of 1.0. We recommend that a factor of safety of at least 1.3 for sliding and overturning be used for design. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared his report for your use and your design representa— tives in planning and design for residential development of this site. Specific design details of the proposed residence are not available at this time. When the design has been finalized, we recommend that we be retained to review the final design and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions from those observed in the explorations, and also with time. We recommend that a contingency for unanticipated conditions be included in the budget and schedule for the project. We recommend that our firm be retained during construction to confirm the conditions indicated by the explorations or to provide additional recommendations based on the conditions revealed during the work. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. — 0 0 0 — • .: ir'J!Y+a. ��;�h��.. `C h,:fN1'M�rT: a{i.r: iC Sv.�i�� 2v��v:r v� L.IID:�Kiv kN IF:. ( ,!•'�::i .. .E � .. GeoEngineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 11 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If there are any questions concerningthis report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. gyp/ Dona d W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Nancy L. / Tochko Project Engineer O' -- v `� . Jon W. Koloski Principal • DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Attachments Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Clyde Miller Copyright m 1988 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved - ;' r �.r. _ .. . �-. '.ii'..r w..Fr','!-.'�":5x;5r*r�;h�'t��i�r-tr.�1,�b 1'', :q� -r.� r: �•tir1 ..,r"`�. � .. .. , . .. m Go rn N 'J Go 1p co co Mu 0 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW GROUP SOIL GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 1 0 - 3.0 ML MOTTLED BROWN AND BROWNISH GRAY SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (SOFT, MOIST) 3.0 - 4.0 SM MOTTLED BROWN AND REDDISH BROWN FINE SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 4.0 - 8.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 8.0 - 12.0 ML GRADES TO VERY STIFF, DAMP, LAMINATED 12.0 - 14.0 ML GRADES TO HARD, LAMINATED WITH FINE SAND TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 14.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 2 0 - 2.5 ML BROWN SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS (SOFT, DAMP) 2.5 - 3.5 SM REDDISH BROWN SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 3.5 - 8.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 8.0 - 15.0 ML GRADES TO DAMP TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 15.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 3 0 - 2.5 ML MOTTLED BROWN SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS (SOFT, MOIST) 2.5 - 4.5 SM REDDISH BROWN TO GRAYISH BROWN SAND WITH SILT AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP,) 4.5 - 12.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 12.0 - 14.0' ML GRADES TO VERY STIFF, DAMP 14.0 - 16.0 ML GRADES TO HARD TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 16.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 4 0 - 3.0 SM-ML MOTTLED BROWN SILTY SAND AND GRAY SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (LOOSE TO SOFT', DAMP TO MOIST) 3.0 - 5.0 SM GRAYISH BROWN SAND WITH SILT AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 5.0 - 16.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST). TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 16.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FEET, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FEET. �� LOG OF TEST PIT Geo s� Engineel'S FIGURE 2 0 Geo OvEngineers A P P E N D I X A SITE EVALUATION CHECKLIST UBC REQUIREMENT 1. Plot plan 2. Description of materials 3. Water table 4. Foundation recommendations 5. Differential settlement 14 RESPONSE See Figure 1 See Figure 2 and SITE CONDITIONS Not encountered See FOUNDATION SUPPORT See FOUNDATION SUPPORT 00 Oo ti 0 0 M O a ell-- Property Line TP-1 f �w TP-4 N 0 20 .40 SCALE IN FEET Qz� 'c Proposed Abandoned Drainage / ,roc j Residence `y TP-2 TP-3 Property Line i EXPLANATION: TP-1 TEST PI.T REFERENCE: DRAWING BY GROUP FOUR., INC,, DATED 8/30/884 p,. Geo Engineers LOCATION AND NUMBER ELEVATION CONTOUR IN FEET i SITE PLAN FIGURE 1 Ihc.1g90 4 0. CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY MAYVOROR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering April 9, 1999 Mr. & Mrs. Miller 16310 751h Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Homeowner Insurance Coverage for Meadowdale Development As you may recall, development of your home was subject to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.05.050 which regulated construction and insurance coverage requirements for all designated Meadowdale Landslide Hazard Area development. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Edmonds City Council has enacted a change which effects your homeowners policy that was required by this ordinance. If you recall you were required to post a one million dollar homeowner policy in order for your home to be granted final occupancy. Please be advised, the City Council has repealed this requirement effective April 16, 1999. In lieu of this policy the City Council will be holding future public hearings to determine alternate coverage methods to ensure that the intent of ECDC 19.05.050 are still met. Please contact the City Clerk if you are interested in attending these meetings. You may wish to consult your insurance professional to determine the proper amount of insurance coverage necessary to meet your - specific needs.. Since the insurance requirement is repealed the City no longer requires to be informed of your coverage or be provided with a copy of your current policy. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 771-0220. Thank you, �& A4�V / Jeannine L. Graf Building Official • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan • • CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works a Planning • Parks and Recreation Y Engineering June 13, 1997 Clyde A & Jane Miller 16310 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Re: Home Owners Insurance Policy BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR As you may recall, the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence Landslide Area Ordinance requires homeowners to post and maintain a policy of general public liability insurance. This insurance is required for a period of not more than 10 years from the date of final approval (occupancy was granted on 4/20/90). According to City records, your certificate of insurance expired on 3/23/92. At your earliest convenience please inform your insurance company that a current copy be provided to the City. As a reminder, the policy must be for general public liability insurance naming the City as additional named insured against personal injury, death, property damage and/or loss arising from, or out of, the City's involvement in the permitting process for the project in the amount of one million dollars. The policy shall also state that the City will be notified 30 days in advance of policy cancellation. Note, this requirement of insurance is transferable to any and all owners within the 10 year period. If you have recently sold your property, please notify the City in writing of the name of the new owners. Please contact me at 771-0220 if you have any questions regarding this insurance requirement. Thank you, 1 Lara Knaak Permit Coordinator cc: Allstate Isurance , Building Official ® Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan -2oS2i ia�eM - 03 INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned applicant(s) for building permit, subdivision, planned residential development, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, in part due to the review of my/our application by the City of Edmonds, Washington, a noncharter, optional municipal c code city, do hereby indemnify, waive, release, and stipulate as 00 follows: 1. I/We do state that we have been provided with/have waived ocj receipt of a copy of an earth subsidence and landslide hazard map made 0' available to me by the City showing those hazards previously identified by the City through its consultant Roger Lowe and Associates, Inc. and a follow-up report by GeoEngineers, Inc., and state that I/we have reviewed or are fully aware of the contents and existence of said maps and of reports explaining said maps and identifying certain hazards to be anticipated or encountered in the construction or development upon my property. I/We am aware that, copies of said report are on file with the City Clerk and available for my review at my request. In addition, I/we have undertaken an independent assessment of the hazards through professional consultants of my/our choosing. 2. PROMISE TO INDEMNIFY: I/We do promise to release and indemnify the City, its agents, officers, employees, and/or independent contractors from any and all claims, damage or loss of any kind or nature resulting from or to any party or person, or the property thereof as a result of: A. The construction design, soils report, and/or any other act required as a part of the building permit application process, subdivision process or planned residential development process and the subsequent preparation of my land for and construction thereon i ` U. VOL. 2223PAGE0863 MAR of any structure or building by myself/ourselves, or my/our agents, employees.or contractors and/or the construction of any building or structure. B. The provisions of false, inaccurate, or misleading information by myself/ourselves, or by my/our agents, employees or contractors in the permit, subdivision, or planned residential development process; and C. Any risk or hazard of which I have been notified or could reasonably have had notice of by review of the documents on file with the the City of.Edmonds or its building division or could have discovered through reasonable professional efforts of my/our experts. 3. The undersigned applicants hereby waive and release the City from any and all claims arising from the situations described in this agreement, but specifically reserve claims against the City, its officers, employees, or -independent contractors, from any loss or damage which arises from or out of the City's sole negligence. Nothing herein shall be construed to be a promise to indemnify the City, its officers, employees, or independent contractors, from any loss or damage caused by their sole negligence. DATED this �_ day of �1-1 ( 19W and given with reference . to building permit application, subdivision application, planned residential development application no. READ CAREFULLY - CONTAINS WAIVER AND INDEMNITY PROVISIONS U I ' ' idual By President By Secretary VOL. 2223PAGE0864 0 00 INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT c x ? STATE OF WASHINGTON ss., COUNTY OF KING On this day personally appeared before me a ( qrfe Or -,re to me known to be t he individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that—L5.,4signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uset and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of 1981. 6 iL-)(fin__ WW1. / ��71-. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Stat of Washington, residing d t ; Qe� cr lr1 rtPO Lek CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. CWNTY OF KING ) On. this day of 119 , before me, the'undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the official seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at VOL.2223PAGE0865 M 0 r = 042102, �. Zpsa 111 y�e U COVENANT TO NOTIFY The undersigned property owner(s), as applicant for C,C//)E/9-r Jgvd-Ex. MF2 a building permit/grading permit, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived, in part 'due to T� the review of my application, do hereby stipulate and promise to the City of Edmonds, Washington, a noncharter optional municipal code city, as follows: 1. SUBJECT TRACT: The undersigned is/are the owner(s) of certain real estate located in the City of Edmonds, Snohomish County,. Washington, and further described as follows: Lots 5 &.6 plus vacated Seaside Avenue north, block 60, of plat of Meadowdale Beach as recorded in volume 5, page 38,. J recorded in Snohomish County. 2. STATEMENT OF HAZARD: The above described subject tract or some portion thereof lies within an area of potential earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been assessed and determined by professionals in the employ of the undersigned property owner(s) through written reports required by, and on file with, the City of Edmonds, Building Division, in application file number All prospective inhabitants, buyers, lenders, or other persons acquiring any interest in the subject tract are hereby notified of such potential hazards and of the information on file with the City, incorporated by this reference as VOL.2223PAGE08.59 �ry� 0� fliUE fully as if herein set forth. In addition to an assessment of any such hazard, said City files may contain conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City in the course of permit issuance and may reference any features. in the design which will require ongoing maintenance or future modification to address anticipated soil changes or movement. All such prospective inhabitants, buyers, lenders or other interested parties are encouraged to review said files and shall be charged with notice of the contents thereof. 3. PROMISE TO NOTIFY: The owners, on behalf of themselves, their hei.rs, agents, successors in interest and/or assigns do hereby promise to inform any successors and assigns that said described property lies within a potential earth subsidence and landslide hazard, of any risk identified by reports- of the professionals and associated with the development of that, property, ...and- of any conditions, prohibitions, restrictions, or ongoing maintenance responsibilities which exist with respect to development of that site. 4. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: These statements are made in and with regard to an application for issued this day of 19 _ , under City of Edmonds file No. 5. WAIVER: I/We/the corporation as the owner of the described tract, and on behalf of my/our/ heirs, successors and assigns do hereby waive the right to assert any loss or claim against the City of Edmonds, its agents, employees, or independent contractors, which may arise by reason of or out of the review of our application and/or issuance of the above -described permit for development approval by the City for the subject property, or from the construction of any building L.. r or structure or any grading, filling or other action pursuant to said permit, excepting, however, any loss arising from the sole negligence of the City, its officers, employees, or independent contractors. DATED this day 0 (Individual) BY ( ndividual) :A (President) (Secretary) CD o co s L 70 71 �c w r-; 1 VOL.2223PAGE08GI INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me i')"1 i• ller• (:xncf W "/ vv , to me known o be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of h in 198Y NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Stat of Washington, residing t �% Y• O CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT �S I ATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 19 , before .me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the official seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at VOL.2223PAGE0862 ytiNw®ate/ wA. 7p )RECEIVED gfro3[ • MAR 10 CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PERMIT COUNTER COVENANT TO PARTICIPATE IN/WAIVE RIGHT TO PROTEST LID WHEREAS, the undersigned owners are the owners of certain real property located in Snohomish County, Washington, which is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herin by this "the reference as if set forth in .full, hereinafter referred to as property," and WHEREAS, the owners have applied to develop the property as 16 3,1 p 7s— F, w, (insert development type), which will have an 'impact on S'/0,6- c�ir�L K insert impact e.g., storm drainage, streets, water, sewer , and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the proposed development, o the City has required the owners to mitigate impacts of the development and the owners and the City have agreed that such mitigation may take 53 the form of participation in a local improvement district (LID) for C".3 construction of certain improvements deemed necessary to mitigate the therefore impact now, , FOR AND INCONSIDERATION OF the City's approval of owners' development of the property described on Exhibit A without requiring owners to presently construct the improvements hereinafter described, the owners covenant and agree as follows: 1. Warranty of Title. The owners warrant that they are the owners of t e property described on Exhibit A and are authorized to enter into this Agreement. 2. Acknowledgment of City Authority. Owners acknowledge that State law and City ordinance provide that the City may require that the following improvements be designed and constructed as a condition of, and to mitigate the effects of, the development proposed by the owners (insert description of specific improvements): Owners further acknowledge that the consideration for this Agreement is approval of owners' development by the City without requiring that such improvements be completed prior to -such approval. 3. Acknowledgment of Special Benefit. Owner acknowledges that the entire property legally described on Exhibit A, and if the proposed development is a subdivision or short subdivision, each and every lot to be created as part of the development of the property legally described on Exhibit A, would be specially benefitted by the construction of the improvements specified in paragraph 2 above. 4. Agreement to Participate in or Waive Protest of LID. A. Petition Method. Owners understand that the formation of VOL. 2223PAGEOgr6 local improvement district which includes the property described on Exhibit A for the purpose of providing the specified improvements will result in the property being assessed a proportionate share of the costs of those improvements. With full understanding of this consequence, owners agree to sign a petition for the formation of an LID or ULID for the specified improvements at such time as a petition is circulated or the City requests the owners to sign such a petition and the owners hereby agree that the Mayor of the City may sign the petition for the owners as the owners' attorney in fact, should the owners fail, refuse or be unable to do so. B. Resolution Method - Waiver of Right to Protest. Owners understand e that owners have t right to protest formation of an LID or.ULID to construct the specified improvements pursuant to RCW 35.43.180. With full understanding of owners' right to protest and the consequences of formation of an LID or ULID, owners agree to participate in any LID or ULID to design or construct the specified improvements and to waive the right to protest formation of the same. Owners shall retain the right to contest the method of calculating any assessment under such LID or ULID and the amount thereof, and shall further retain the right to appeal confirmation of the final assessment roll in the manner provided by law. 5. Binding Effect - Duration. This Agreement shall be recorded with the __Snohomish County Auditor, shall constitute a covenant running with the land described on Exhibit A, and shall be binding upon the owners, their heirs, successors in interest and assigns, provided, that this Agreement shall be valid only for a period of ten (10) years from the date it is signed by the owners, after which it shall expire and become null and void. 6. Specific Enforcement. In addition to any other'remedy provided by law or this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement may be specifically enforced by the City of Edmonds. 7. Attorney's Fees. In any suit or action brought by the City of Edmonds to enforce any provision of thi.$ Agreement or to redress any breach, the owners covenant that the City shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to any other remedy. DATED this /6 day of /%'J 1984.- U E K/SS S10rrl F� OWNERS fXP� �O T ntz A pU u L. r , °F WAS�A' �y'�j �y p�y,�ouQ�o.��,.f.��° VOL. 222iPAGEOHJ% 8 9 04 21(�'09 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. u,o DATED this day of NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 198_ o ) C STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss: COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the (title) of (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of , 198. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: VOL. 2223PAGE O8'8 8,, N'Qzn v,` -1-0M 0 v1 -I Mr`l1 -4 m l-r r = �-+ r 2 r+ r S m �=+ 0r-1W• 00mw 0 0 m w 0 0 c W r 0 l-. r 3 A r- X ;a ►r 3 -n O W O cl 1 "0 p ►- 1 -o CD — 1 10 Ca X I C 0 z 0 0 0000 (A000 V)Om o ►�x ;;o a, 0xma� oxma, 0 x z aa N S 'V O Z N O z 00 Z 00 N r-4 1 r r1 r X rrT0 -nw-p o mw�0 mW ol0 O0r00 DNm O >r-jm0 DNCIO V1 ►.r r v -i V r -j " a` r v o �%.n ODm 1 r m I Ir m I r oft x O O 0 ;v O V> 0 cn -< O ic o O 0 `O X z 0 Z 00 T 0p m 0` -1 CD! O CT X r N m m C v co a W N W m N m N D N �.n m 1 n .- n" z CA Vt n41 n41 z V O 1 D V > V l-' co V V O 0 F 0 D Co VI D V V1 ►' r- Co co CID Oo Co r W W W CT m nr oco z 0r XC DmCO X 0N-4r0CD T N n -arm 3 4-+0mr m coo m z z w r- m z 0 m 0p-rm w 0 rgrim M., o-inuo"P-An wo-+�.�n «-zc�n VN Vf O W D -4 p VI r In N O w< (A p 00 N cno9 00 'VCr l--\ V 00 00 no%x o.Izmm Z W N n rTx po<CT T m oZH<ZO 0z0n r-0 D I ►�zrOO n n-4n1 D' zZ-40or \ n0z or ow<c or 0 0r- smn I m NWm mor i m Cr -cV)a, I m c N 1 m W N 0 co co>z00 OX0 0 znmo( nnr(7,oco "nzw--40"0= 1 m <VOW 0">OW 00 —0 m Wool--m m On"n r m "0 m 7O7o 0V" I D z O on.0 1 D O Onc I D D <" I D S 10 n 70 < C O N O n Ln c (An m O n •00m -4 m<O%OO rr= I zno = Om T= mmoax npov+zcn<O Ov-m< zT o D U, o m P-+ --1 o -i D v o n -i 'rra -I�o c-iOoTrnzw 0J> V)n m< �o0V)m Z041'"n a) om r+ co0m -� --1 p M O In n Z V O O CA V x co r r n0fn rn0z c,z-nmm OUT .-•-►- m c D. 0 v+ 0 D co z x1 00•-41 V) n %.nxowo v! m > w Non; z %A -< m m - m m 0- CA 0 < " P- V! 10` "O1 < z m< 1 WVarno o m x ND 0 0 x V>NCDD ►-00 m N-9 m%00 mow C 1 a I cozm .omr x ;o co <;10O <o ONOxD 10;o0 DfAVf -4mm « CI`P-on< 6 m -1n m oo VA wr oo m .o" a-1rn wx"Cxmz I N-0m CO Z0 N 07amof 010m Z O-1 O ►� 0-4 m m< n 1 D 0 �0 ;0 o`Z00 0m ON NO ,nm N; 1 zoTo om 410 o al--,o n .moo X v --4i l-- < O �, O m co 0 0 0 0 N N N N co Ca co co %o 4 .o 10 I -4 CA r -1 CD r I I O r n O r D O O n z I nr Om 0 < m< �EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO *Oem number. Originator: Planning Division For Action: X For Information: SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM CLYDE A. MILLER & JANICE L. MILLER FOR STREET DEDICATION AT 16320 75TH PLACE WEST AGENDA TIME: Consent AGENDA DATE: March 21, 1989 EXHIBITS ATTACHED: 1. Quit Claim Deed 2. Vicinity Map Clearances: Dept./Indiv./Initials ADMIN SVCS/FINANCE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING PARKS & ECREATION PLANNING PUBLIC WO iKS FIRE PERSONNEL POLICE COMMITTEE MAYOR �-7 COMMENTS: EXPENDITURE AMOUNT APPROPRIATION REQUIRED: $0 BUDGETED: $0 REQUIRED: $0 HISTORY AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: As required by the Official Street Map, Clyde & Janice Miller have quit claimed 10 feet of their property along 75th Pl. W. to the City of Edmonds for street purposes in conjunction with their application for a building permit. Attached are a copy of the quit claim deed and a vicinity map. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the quit claim deed from Clyde & Janice Miller. QCDEED/COUNCIL %4-w. # S T27 3 R4 507 COUNTY PARK . � Tf i SS�B 1$52415 I5515 h M S h p N rss,c 16 t>r 15517 n 15605 156oG 15b01 N 15609 15614 ^ H o 15621 qj 15615 15620 ^ a a - Cal \ p 15631 apN .9 15625 r 0 n S 1` ^ .o . o H 1�703 15705 /sue`° p`^ a 0 15701 r570z °D o n y � OD l5706 157/z 1• 1` 15709 15707 m ,p< 157H r572� �t1I 1 3 � 1572215725 71 15T29 1572E Q �31 •11.5721 ��3 1�/9. v 15720 15 9 - O 1573 w 15772 V � 2 I58 rrr x f 15727 15810 158(4 15900 Is6a4 15608 IS80 v /5821 15824 15810 155/4 TM —` 15805 72"" 1158 15827 15826 15828 ISe" w 15825 = 411) G r5824 5902 /59oq '15901 � o CL 15908 l5925 3 15910 5908 15906 159oa 15902 15927 J ol c > 15917 15915 1592215 �j, 2 5929 15920 15926 $ a 920 `I rc,000 -- s NORTH �� 15931 IliS.W. 110" 40 cc 16012 _ 1L029 � IG019 16010 � � � ti I603r 16105 lbozo v ., Coo�0d. IGloo I(ol ST S.W. cROv.av t /6/// 1(,1.. .,Rk�liA /6205 , All 11 -- '16r °g 3 /6115 16122 _ 16131 —_ r 3 9209 6216 16 62(4 6211 a3 �, OPEN rP9cE 16221 16209 16206 > 16215 0 1 J6210 Qv F A. 6220--- 16219 16238 16256 6224 6228� /6223 i 3 e T 16n5 163 I6222 16232 y �5 a co Co 16411 63� 6306 3 16317 = w o 14330 16310 16315 6320 16 .o 0 '0 ( 6404 16429 12511 �19 �},v � 16323 16322 16321 GPIPZS00 g TN T W, 'P z � � i J n -10 16g T" �. �✓. l6419 r n / o wo 00 MEMORANDUM March 10, 1989 TO: Cindi Cruz, Planning Secretary FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator ,[¢ SUBJECT: CA Miller 16320 75th Place West Quit Claim Deed for 10 Foot Street Dedication I have attached a quit claim deed for the proposed CA Miller residence at 16320 75th Place West. As required by the official street map Mr. Miller is making a ten foot dedication to the City. Please prepare this document for consent agenda to the City Council. Z 0 0. MEMORANDUM March 28, 1989 TO: Hal Reeves Building Official / FROM: Jerry Hauth �/ Hydraulics Engineer """��I SUBJECT: ISSUANCE••OF THE MILLER S.F. BUILDING PERMIT AT 1 - 75TH PL. W. A3/0 The Engineering Division still has several items that need to be clarified in conjunction with the construction of the Miller residence at 16320 - 75th P1..W. It is our feeling that these items listed below can be dealt with after issuance of the building permit. First, the Miller's drainage plan calls for a plugging of the City storm culvert that daylights onto the lot on the eastern property line. This implies that the water from this pipe will then be rerouted to the City catch basin to the north. In order to do this, the Millers will need Burlington Northern's permission because the water that is being rerouted flows under the tracks through a different culvert. The Miller's engineer should also provide the design flow calculations and their review of any downstream impacts for verification. Second, a sanitary sewer line bisects the property running north/south near the westerly property -line. The exact location can be verified by stretching a line from manhole to manhole, which are on the properties to the north and south. It appears that this line will fall in the western setback, which is allowable. { There also appears to be a conflict between the cross section shown and stated earth quantities shown for excavation. Unless resubmitted, the applicant.should be notified that the City assumes that the stated quantities are correct. If these. quantities are found to be wrong in the field, a serious problem on permitting will be created. DS/RJA/JWH/sdt MLRPRMT/TXTST530 E NOTICE. No work may commence on this -building permit until the City Planning and Engineering departments have determined that all conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner and Burlington Northern have been complied with. The conditions are attached to this notice. No work on this permit may commence until the responsible official signs this form, as provided below. I have read the above statement and agree to its terms. c 3-zq- nice Miller �� Date Approved for Construction - pow. Vi mv�-- m- 'd FOR U11ding Utticial BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue PACIFIC DIVISION Seattle, WA 98104-1105 Mr. Clyde Miller November 29, 1988 20521 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, WA 98036 Dear Mr. Miller: .Re: Application for storm water runoff dated November 15, 1988, at EDMONDS, WA. Please refer to the transmittal of location, designs and application presented to Burlington Northern Railroad Company by Michael W. Pederson, A.I.A., of Edmonds, WA on November 16, 1988, and your visit to this office on November 17, 1988. Field Engineer, Mr. Don Omsberg has reviewed the above application, meeting on site with you on November 28, 1988, to discuss the possibilities of this installation. Wish to herewith advise the Burlington Northern Railroad, as requested, is able to respond to this request advising 'no objections' to issuing you a formal Permit Agreement for the proper installation of this storm water runoff facility after.the sale of property served by this request is finalized. We have established a file number shown below, for the ongoing review of this request, as it is understood future designs will be submitted by Michael W. Pederson, A.I.A. based on Mr. Omsberg's on site inspection. Kindly refer to file number when corresponding about this matter until finalized. Also, kindly advise date sale has finalized. At that time we will continue to process this application accordingly. Yours truly, Bob Luckey Permit Clerk/PACIFIC DIVISION File: 6014 Edmonds cc: ✓Michael W. Pederson, A.I.A 8623 204th Street S. W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Mr. Mike Peterson WHEN TERRAIN, etc., DICT ARIANCE PLEASE USE APP,LICATION. 1-ILL 11V-r- VV1`t LUIIIVIIUa APPLICATION FOR PIPE LINE PERMIT BURLINGTON Drainage Pipeline crossing NORTHERN To BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY Date 1. At what City or Village is permit desired? D Si. e \i jyC�aTO (,—' 2. Full name and address of Applicant C+E 1 1 i. J rl�ufioD, Punar — ��:,r_. 1'— , .7 .— •-1 i �� ZO S Z 1 j4 L" � . 3. If Applicant is a corporation, in what state incorporated? If an individual, tinder what firm name is business conducted? J\/1 tG:" '77�—p�3�j If partnership, give name of all partners 4. Product to be handled in pipe line "416 Tt` [Z 2.11 rd 5. Pipe Data: a. Outside diameter b. Inside diameter- C. Pipe material_ d. Specifications and grade e. Wall thickness_ CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE A 6. a. Depth of pipe under track (top of tie to TOP of casing) b. Angle of crossing •c.In city street? O YES O NO 7. If pipe is to be placed longitudinally with track, give a. location of pipe in relation to centerline of nearest track_ b. depth of coverage (ground line to top of pipe) f. Actual working pressure_ g. Type of joint h. Coating i. Methodcf installation_ j. Will cathodic protection be provided? CARRIER PIPE CASING PIPE 8. If installation is to be by jacking or boring method give location of jacking and receiving pits and submit plans. a. Depth b. Distance facing wall of pit to centerline of nearest track (measured normal) c. Minimum distance from center line of track and face of boring pits will be 25' 9. Reference plans (to be forwarded with original application) a. Drawing Number b. Prepared by 10-Submit jacking pit plans if applicable., cross sections. Applicant agrees that if installation requires any or all of the following work; removal and replacement of track, bridging, protection of track or other railway facilities by work or flagging, engineering and/or supervision; such work is to be performed by railway employes and the cost borne by Applicant. if in the opinion of the Railway Company sufficient hazard is involved the Applicant will be required to furnish liability and property damage insurance in form and amounts satisfactory to Burlington Northern. By�f YI p4E-)TISC?kl , (Applicant) (Title) RECOMMENDATIONS: (If additional space is required attach supplemental sheet) Date lg APPLICATION. APPROVED: ISuperintencientl (Asst. Vice President —Operations) FOgM 16002 1-73 (General Manager Leases) (Regional Manager Engineering) Printed in U.S.A. "i 890_194 CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR 250-5th AVE N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR July 17, 1989 Mr. Clyde Miller 20521 14th West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 RE: SF Residence Permit #890256 16310 75th Place West This letter is in response to your question about the need to retain your design architect throughout the construction of your new single family residence at 16310 75th Place West. According to the Meadowdale Ordinance, the owner is required to choose either the design architect or structural engineer as the lead design professional for his/her project. In your case the architect was chosen, he coordinated all submittals and acted as the liaison between the City and all other applicable parties during the permit review process. The responsibility of the lead design professional does not end with the issuance of the permit. This person is charged with assuring the City, as well as the owner, that the home is built per the approved plans. Therefore, if you decide to replace your current architect, you will be required to select a new design professional. Please note, this could be the structural engineer who prepared your plans. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Miller Page Two July 17, 1989 If you decide on a new professional, that person would have to review all approved plans and submittal materials, and write a letter to the City indicating their review and concurrence with the design, recommendations and requirements for the project. This letter would be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. If the design professional recommends changes to the original plans these changes will be subject to review by the City's review consultant. On another matter, the code is specific that construction reports are to be submitted on a weekly basis by the structural engineer on the project. If there is no new information to report, then the weekly inspection report shall indicate this status. I hope I have sufficiently answered your questions. If I can be of further service, please feel free to contact me or Peter Hahn. Thank you, ��PAV' Jeannine L. G Permit Coordinator • • V BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD PACIFIC DIVISION MAY 16 1989 PERMIT COUNTER, City of Edmonds Office of City Engineer 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Attention: Jerry Hauth: Gentlemen: ibz ECG. WE Lj I ,.-%, 4 1989 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104-1 105 May 1, 1989 In reference to the Miller Building permit #890256 and the condition of water re-routing. This is to advise that we have reviewed the Drainage Plans and after a subsequent field inspection, find no objections to the water being re-routed as stated: The capping of an_,existing 12" storm drain that extends under 75th Place West and daylights into the Miller lot on the East property line and the re-routing of the water from this pipe to an existing city catch basin thirty feet to the north via a 12" CMP as per Clyde Miller Grading & Drainage plan prepared by Group Four Inc., dated March 24, 1989. Sincerely, D.A. Bell Superintendent Maintenance & Engineering MSP/cb CC: Mr. P.L. Adelman Gr up uo rIn File: Edmonds, Wa. 2 (Proposed storm system near Meadowdale). 6014 Edmonds, Wa. STREET FILE0Y 4 1989 AWED El�i:INEEf11NG IBtJRLIIVGTOM NgRTHERN RAILROAD PACIFIC DIVISION City of Edmonds Office of City Engineer 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Attention: Jerry Hauth: Gentlemen: 2000 First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104-1 105 May 1, 1989 In reference to the Miller Building permit #890256 and the condition of water re-routing. This is to advise that we have reviewed the Drainage Plans and after a subsequent field inspection, find no objections to the water being re-routed as stated: . The capping of an existing 12" storm drain that extends under 75th Place West and daylights into the Miller lot on the East property line and the re-routing of the water from this pipe to an existing city catch basin thirty feet to the north via a 12" CMP as per Clyde Miller Grading & Drainage plan prepared by Group Four Inc., dated March 24, 1989. Sincere1 p D.A. Bell v Superintendent Maintenance & Engineering MSP/cb �I CC: Mr'; P.L. Adelman Mr. Ray Miller, Group F66r Inc. File: Edmonds, Wa. 2 (Proposed storm system near Meadowdale) 6014 Edmonds, Wa. 890 194 9 STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 51h AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 7 71-3202 • 1630 '75 �C . COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering April 26, 1989 Mr. Clyde Miller 20521 - 14th W. Lynnwood, WA. 98036 Re: Construction on 75th Place Dear Mr. Miller: LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR I received a telephone call from Mike Pederson asking me to write a letter for you to relay to Burlington Northern Railroad. The purpose of this letter is to clarify the issues that need to be resolved with BNRR prior to engineering approval. of your building permit. I have attached a copy of your proposed plans for reference. You have proposed to abandon the drainage swale across your property. In order to accomplish this, you propose to remove and replace an existing catch basin on 75th P1. and extend a pipe from the new replacement catch basin northerly to an existing catch basin. The catch basin that you propose to replace currently has pipes coming into it from the north, east and south, and discharges westerly across your property. By diverting this flow northerly, it will take any flow which currently goes across your lot and into the adjoining culvert under BNRR tracks, to 162nd St. and into the BNRR culvert adjoining Meadowdale Marine. When we built the sewers in the Meadowdale area five years ago, BNRR staff made it very clear that they were concerned about the capacity of their drains under the tracks. Because of this concern, I need to have verification from BNRR staff that the proposed diversion is acceptable. This can be in the form of a letter from one of their engineers stating that he has reviewed the plans and feels that the proposed diversion is acceptable. Please include a copy of the plans with his signature to insure that we are all talking about the same plans. • Incorporated August 11,1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Clyde Miller April 26, 1989 Page 2 If I can be of any additional assistance in this matter, feel free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, �dw JERRY W. HAUTH, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer JWH/sdt Attachment (ZQri`- Alberts CMILLER/TXTST530 • 0 MEMORANDUM March 28, 1989 TO: Hal Reeves Building Official FROM: Jerry Hauth q`� 4 Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: ISSUANCE OF THE MILLER S.F. BUILDING PERMIT AT 16�- 75TH PL. W. PL. W. A-5/0 The Engineering Division still has several items that need to be clarified in conjunction with the construction of the Miller residence at 16320 - 75th P1. W. It is our feeling that these items listed below can be dealt with after issuance of the building permit. First, the Miller's drainage plan calls for a plugging of the City storm culvert that daylights onto the lot on the eastern property line. This implies that the water from this pipe will then be rerouted to the City catch basin to the north. In order to do this, the Millers will need Burlington Northern's permission because the water that is being rerouted flows under the tracks through a different culvert. The Miller's engineer should also provide the design flow calculations and their review of any downstream impacts for verification. Second, a sanitary sewer line bisects the property running north/south near the westerly property line. The exact location can be verified by stretching a line from manhole to manhole, which are on the properties to the north and south. It appears that this line will fall in the western setback, which is allowable. There also appears to be a conflict between the cross section shown and stated earth quantities shown for excavation. Unless resubmitted, the applicant should be notified that the City assumes that the stated quantities are correct. If these quantities are found to be wrong in the field, a serious problem on permitting will be created. DS/RJA/JWH/sdt MLRPRMT/TXTST530 • 0 Geo0Engineers Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller: March 24, 1989 Supplemental Declaration Driveway Alignment Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists We have reviewed the revised driveway alignment shown in drawings prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated March 24, 1989, and in our opinion the proposed driveway will not adversely affect slope stability or site drainage. We trust this letter meets your present needs. Yours very truly, GeoE ineers,,.IInnc. Jon. W. Koloski -Principal .' DWT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206)746-5068 R'EC 1V &&0 MAR 2 7 R�51 L J 9 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND HYDROLOGY P.O. BOX 1029 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020-1029 (206) 778-0907 Mr. Peter E. Hahn, Director City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 BUDGET STATUS RE -REVIEW OF PROJECT PLANS PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR CLYDE MILLER 16300 BLOCK, 75TH PLACE WEST MEADOWDALE AREA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Hahn: March 16, 1989 Our office was recently asked to complete a re -review of project plans concerning the above -noted residence. The request was made by Mr. Hal Reeves, Building Inspector. Mr. Reeves, was verbally informed at the time of the request that our original budget for this project was at its limit. Accordingly, this letter constitutes our formal request for an additional $250 to complete the re -review and final letter. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. Our services may be authorized by signing in the space provided below; or by your preferred method. Please return one copy of this letter with your authorization. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. eve z� William D. Evans, CPG Project Manager WDE/jlg 2 copies submitted • AUTHORIZATION The scope of services and contractual conditions as described in this proposal are accepted and Landau Associates, Inc., is authorized to proceed. By signature* printed For the City of Edmonds date * Name of person with contractual authority responsible for payment of Landau Associates, Inc., billing.' 890-199 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 7 71-3 202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DATE: 3-10-89 TO: SUBJECT: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mike Pedersen CA Miller SF Residence 16320 75th P1 W TRANSMITTING: City of Edmonds determination on driveway slope memo dated 3-10-89. FOR YOUR APPROVAL: FOR YOUR FILE: AS YOU REQUESTED: FOR YOUR INFORMATION: COMMENT AND RETURN: REVIEW AND COMMENT: FOR STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK: RESPOND TO LETTER: RESUBMIT 2 REVISED DRAWINGS: FOR CORRECTIONS AND RESUBMITTAL SEND COMMENTS DIRECTLY TO BUILDING DIVISION: COMMENTS: LARRY S.NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The Community Development Code allows staff determinations to be appealed to the Hearing Examiner within 10 working days from the date of the decision. If you have any questions regarding the appeal process please contact Duane Bowman at 771-3202. BUILDING DIVISION J;;-'L/7 Jeannine L. Graf Permit Coordinator • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan ---__..._.._.,..,,,.. n-.,,,-A -7/00 M E M O R A N D U M March 10, 1989 TO: Peter Hahn, Community Services/Public Works Director VIA: Mary Lou Block, Planning Directoru-�J6- FROM: Jeannine L. Graf, Permit Coordinator 37.,Cc47, SUBJECT: Proposed CA Miller Residence at 16320 75th Place West Meadowdale Landslide Hazard Area Driveway Slope The building division has received a written request from Mr. Miller for exemption on driveway slopes as provided for in Chapter 18.80.060 (D) of the Edmonds Community Development Code. As stated in this code section the public works director may authorize driveway slopes up to a maximum of 20% provided that the following criteria be met: 1) The driveway is the only economically and environmentally reasonable alternative, 2) The driveway will not present a traffic, pedestrian, bicycle or safety hazard, 3) The Police and Fire Chief concur in allowing the increased driveway slope, 4) The public health, safety and general welfare will not be adversely affected. The attached plan indicates a 21% average driveway slope with a 24% maximum slope. This grade is calculated from the end of the driveway by the house out to the street. In the steepest area the slope actually appears to exceed 34%. Attached is a letter from Mr. Miller's architect and a copy of the code provision in Chapter 18. ro 0 Geoi,,01 Engineers � A 'P'£R�I� COUNTER March 8, 1989 Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Pederson: Confirmation of Discussions Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98020 File No. 1403-01-2 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists This letter confirms several points which we discussed with you yesterday during our review of your revised building plans and specifications, dated March 7, 1989, for the proposed Miller residence in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds. The revised plans implement a number of changes suggested by Landau Associates Inc. in their letter of January 12, 1989, and also several recommendations which we provided to you during the course of our review. The revised plans indicate a sand filter surrounding the footing drains, and contain specifications for the drain and backfill materials. It is our opinion that the footing drain design specified can adequately provide long term drainage at this site. It is our opinion that cutting of the trees on the slope between the street and the location of the proposed residence will not significantly decrease the stability of that slope, provided that the slope is promptly revegetated with ornamental or native vegetation having similar ground cover and root strength characteristics. The proposed location of the driveway crossing the slope appears to minimize the amount of slope disturbance required by site access. We have recommended against - alternative driveway layouts that would increase the disturbed area of the slope. GeoEngineers. Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 'telephone (200) 746-5200 F;ix. (206) 746-5008 Geo ff p ngineers Michael Pederson, AIA March 8, 1989 Page 2 We trust that this letter meets your presents needs. If you have any questions regarding this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. d 7� Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist w5wen Three copies submitted Al- MICHAEL W. PEDERON, A.I.A. MEMBER: ARCHITECT N.CARB. 535 MAIN ST., ED*ONDS, WA 98020 BUSINESS: 774-0830 March 8, 1989 R t V. MAR J Pn i n City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Bobbi Mills, Public Works Director Ref: Driveway slopes, S/F Residence Miller, 16320 75th Pl. W. Dear Bobbi: This letter is a request to exceed the 14% to 20% slope allowance at the above referenced address for a new home presently submitted for a building permit. There are several reasons for this. Most importantly, we want to maintain minimum disturbance of the site and its existing soil conditions. This project is in a thirty percent slide zone and that fact, we feel, justifies this request. In order to ever achieve a 20% or less slope to the drive would cause considerable site disturbance, upheaval and destabalizing the present upper layers of soil plus construction of more retaining walls, or additional rockeries and considerable landfill being hauled in. The drive shown has been designed to minimize the site disturbance in an optimum way, mostly to minimize ground disturbance. The direction of the drive may minimize any possibility for potential accident from occuring at the house if a heavy vehicle were to enter the drive. Lastly, the construction of a drive within the guidelines would be economically excessive and a risk requirement for the city and others involved. Waver of the slope requirement should be in the best interests of everyone. Sincere , hael W. Pederson A.I.A. �► MICHAEL W. PEDEWON, A.I.A. MEMBER: ARCHITECT N.CA.RB. '0- 535 MAIN ST., EDMONDS, WA 98020 March 8, 1989 pERI`fi1G C4�NTER W. J .A., P.S. 306 Seattle Tower Third & University Seattle, Washington 98101 Subject: Edmonds Plan Check 16300 Blk 75th Place Miller -Client Edmonds, Washington BUSINESS: 774-0830 Ref: Response to letter dated January 10, 1989 and per drawings dated March 7, 1989, the following list denotes changes requested or added General 1. See sheet A-8, miscellaneous Fanning 1. See sheet A-5, detail 3 Foundation 1. See sheets A-3, A-4, A-5, S-1 & A-8 2. See sheet A-5, detail 4 3. See sheet A-2 4. See calculations 5. See calculation Lateral 1. See sheet A-2 2. See sheet A-2 3. See sheets A-2 and A-8 Items Added 1. Retaining walls, see sheets A-2, A-3, A-5, A-6 and S-1 2. Rociceries, see sheets A-1 and S-1 3. Underslab charge drains, see sheets A-3. Sincer y�. v � chael W. Pederson A.I.A. 0 WJA, P.S. WHITELEY JACOBSEN AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS / ENGINEERS / PLANNERS 306 Seattle Tower Third and University Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 623-0331 FAX: (206) 467-8441 10 January 1989 Mr. Hal Reeves Edmonds Building Department Edmonds Civic Center 250 Fifth North Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Edmonds Plan Check 16300 Blk 75th Place Miller - Owner Michael Pederson - AIA 'Single Family Dear Mr. Reeves: olt:010: AN 111989 [40iID We have reviewed the referenced project's structural requirements and have the following comments: General 1. General notes must be shown on the drawings under one heading and must include: a. Non -bearing walls must be held away from the truss bottom chord with an approved fastener (such as Simpson STC or approved equal) to insure that the truss bottom chord will not bear on the wall. Framing 1. Show a detail on the drawings for the connection of deck railings. The railing must sustain the load of 20 pounds per lineal foot (Table 23-B-9). Pr,„ -A n t ; .ter, 1. Drains at retaining walls must be shown with gravel or clean fill to the top of the backfill a minimum of one foot wide. 2. Show or note on the drawings details of the connection transferring the earth load imposed on the retaining wall into the floor diaphragm. (Sections 2310, 2312(j)3, 2516(e).) 1 r Mr. Hal Reeves / 10 January 1989 Page Two 3. Masonry fireplace details or notes must include: a. The fireplace should be a minimum of 8" thick at the throat location. b. Double #2 horizontal ties are required at all bends in the main vertical rebar. Section 3704. 4. Wall footings appear under reinforced to span 20'. Please check the calculations, it appears a width of 12" was used instead of 8". 5. Retaining wall horizontal reinforcement does not meet. minimum wall reinforcement requirements. Lateral 1. Shear walls must be provided with drag struts and the attachment to the shear wall clearly shown. Drag struts may be required along west wall. 2. Holddowns may also be required along west wall. 3. Plywood shear wall nailing must conform to Table 25-K of the UBC (Section 2513(c)). GWB shear walls must conform to Table 47-1 (Section 4713(a)). Provide a nailing schedule with spacing or a note on the drawings. Respond in writing to each one of these comments, referring by heading and item number (e.g. Lateral l.b.) as shown on this letter followed by the measures taken to comply. Please call if you have any questions regarding the comments. Very truly yours, WJA, P.S. Architects, Engineers, Planners ;.'Jack H. Whiteley, '� Civil and Struct KlEngineer `� • ao Geo�Engineers �;�, fl� MAR 9 - R�C[l PERMIT COUl�YE4t. March 8, 1989 Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller: Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Geotechnical Declaration Neadowdale Permit Submittal Checklist_ Niller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 We have reviewed the revised 'building plans and specifications for the proposed Miller residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated March 7, 1989. In our judgment, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment, the risk of damage to the proposed development, or ,to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately 30 percent within a 25-year period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report. On -site design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to the residence include structural stiffening Geolingineers, Inc. 2405140111 Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fxx. (206) 746-5068 Mr. Clyde Miller March 8, 1989 Page 2 to strengthen the structure against possible ground movement and incor- porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present needs. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist Nancy L. Tochko Project Engineer 1on 7VW. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Copyright © 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved ,p G e o ,W En ineeis . �ERM1�COUNTER March 8, 1989 Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Pederson: Confirmation of Discussions Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98020 File No. 1403-01-2 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists This letter confirms several points which we discussed with you yesterday during our review of your revised building plans and specifications, dated March 7, 1989, for the proposed Miller residence in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds. The revised plans implement a number of changes suggested by Landau Associates Inc. in their letter of January 12, 1989, and also several recommendations which we provided to you during the course of our review. The revised plans .indicate a sand filter surrounding the footing drains, and contain specifications for the drain and backfill materials. It is our opinion that the footing drain design' specified can adequately provide long term drainage at this site. It is our opinion that cutting of the trees on the slope between the street and the location of the proposed residence will not significantly decrease the stability of that slope, provided that the slope is promptly revegetated with ornamental or native vegetation having similar ground cover and root strength characteristics. The 'proposed location of the driveway crossing the slope appears to minimize -the amount of slope disturbance required by site access. We have recommended against alternative driveway layouts that would increase the disturbed area of the slope. GeoEngineers. Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellceue, WA 98005 Iclephone 0.6) 746-5 200 Fax.(2())-46-5068 • Geo Engineers Michael Pederson, AIA March 8, 1989 Page 2 We trust that this letter meets your presents needs. If you have any questions regarding this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. r Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist DWT:dk Three copies submitted .,, s *��f �K�R..y4. P, fc,(.g'���= ..,b� z . . � l' � '•.,i $ '� K�(: r' W�ri_ ti r: , �� • Geo , �j'Engineers�.�� March 8, 1989 Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller: Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Geotechnical Declaration Meadowdale Permit Submittal Checklist Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 We have reviewed the revised building plans and specifications for the proposed Miller residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated March 7, 1989. In our judgment, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment, the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions s.et forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately 30 percent within a 25-year period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report. On -site design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to the residence include structural stiffening GeoF.ngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. \F., Suite 105 Bellevue, VIA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fxx. (206) 746-5068 0 Mr. Clyde Miller March 8, 1989 Page 2 to strengthen the structure against possible ground movement and incor— porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present needs. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist Nancy L. Tochko Project Engineer ionW. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Copyright © 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved 9 LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTF_CHNICAL ENGINEERING AND HYDROLOGY P.O. BOX 694 EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206)778-0907 Mr. Peter Hahn, City of Edmonds Director 250 Fifth Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTATION CLYDE AND JANICE MILLER RESIDENCE 16300 BLOCK, 75TH PLACE WEST MEADOWDALE AREA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Hahn: • RECENED FEB 0 91988 Communiry nir February 7, 1989 The City of Edmonds (City) has requested Landau Associates, Inc. to provide geotechnical consultation regarding review of building permit applications in response to Ordinance No. 2661. A scope of services is currently being developed for a Basic Agreement between Landau Associates and the City. However, we understand that an immediate review of the Miller residence application is needed; therefore, this letter is an interim agreement related to that application. The purpose of Landau Associates' services will be to review the geotechnical engineer's reports and other data with the Miller application and to provide our opinion to the City regarding the "standard of practice" used by the geotechnical engineer in independent analyses or investigation.. A comprehen- sive written report is not anticipated; however, our opinion resulting from the review will be confirmed by letter. As we agreed, our services will be on a time and expense basis. Billing for our services will be based on the attached schedule of charges. A budget of $850.00 is appropriate for this application review. We will not exceed this amount without your express written approval. Of course, we will bill for only the time and expense actually incurred and will advise you if the budget amount needs modification. Some information regarding the Miller property has been forwarded to us. We expect to accomplish the review within a week following receipt of the application information and written authorization. Thee City acknowledges that Landau Associates, Inc. is acting in: an .advisory capacity only. Accordingly, the City agrees to fully indemnify and hold harmless'Landau Associates, Inc. and its employees'from and' against'-any'claim,'suit, action, or liability ::;,.arising from the;`issuance or denial of a building permit, and :`arising from. bodily injury (including. death) or property' damage resulting from instability of the property. This indemnity is not" applicable to general liability for bodily injury and property damage due to employee accidents or.due to negligent or.. tortious acts of Landau Associates or its employees. .:- We appreciate the opportunity to provide service- to the ". City::.:': Please return to us..one copy'. of this letter signed in the space provided below,.Please contact us, if you have any questions: 4 Yours very. truly, '.. LANDAU, ASSOCIATES; INC. By: William D. Evans, CPG � Project Manager a -AUTHORIZATION r, • 'The: scope of services -:and contractual conditions as described:.' this ,letter. are..accepted.Viand: Landau Associates, 1c..is autho oceed. signature -printed For the :.City of Edmonds �--� ate 61-k4- Mr. Peter E. Hahn, City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 CONSULTATION LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND HYDROLOGY P.O. BOX 694 EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 Director (206) 778-0907 PROPOSED RESIDENCE FOR CLYDE MILLER 16300 BLOCK, 75TH PLACE WEST MEADOWDALE AREA EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Hahn: January 12, 1989 BUILDING JAN 131989 This letter summarizes the results of our review of the geotechnical report, building plans, and associated correspon- dence concerning the above -noted project. The information provided by the City of Edmonds for our review -is listed on the attached reference page. In our opinion, the September 20, 1988, geotechnical report by GeoEngineers, Inc. was accomplished in general accordance with applicable standards of practice. However, we have concerns with regard to how the conclusions and recommendations contained in the geotechnical report have been applied to the final building plans. Specific concerns and comments follow: 1) The GeoEngineers' report states that grade changes in excess of 3 feet should not be allowed, with the exception being at the basement/retaining walls. Based on the Grading and Drainage Plan, an approximate 10 foot high cut will be made immediately east of the garage. Slope regrading or a properly designed restraint system (retaining wall or rock- eries) must'. be installed at this location. Encroachment into the 10 foot setback should be evaluated for any permanent retaining structure. 2) Based on existing and proposed grades, it will be necessary to pump sewage effluent from the residence to the municipal system. If a pressure pumping system is used, a separation of the discharge line could result in direct injection of fluid into the hillside. For this reason, we suggest that the system be designed to: a) fully drain the discharge 1 • line between pumping testing. Plans or should be provided. cycles, and b) allow for periodic leak specifications covering this detail 3) The Drainage Plan shows a 6-inch drain line extending down the hill and discharging near the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. The drawing shows this line to be buried at a depth of 4 to 8 feet. This depth of excavation appears excessive and will make excavation and backfilling of the line difficult. For this reason, we suggest that the line be installed at a shallower depth or staked to the face of the hillside. 4) The GeoEngineers' report states that no fill is to be placed within the 25-foot zone between the residence and the top of the slope. In our opinion, this no -filling zone should be clearly noted on the plans. 5) The GeoEngineers' report states.that the building is to have a 25 foot setback from the top of slope; however, the plans show that the setback has been taken from the property line. The architect and geotechnical engineer should reach an agreement on the proper setback. 6) Typical wall section D-D on Sheet A-4 of the Building Plans shows several items which we believe need clarification. These are summarized below. a. Based on recommendations contained in the GeoEngineers report, the burial depth for the footings will vary and, in most cases, will be in excess of 2 feet. The 2-foot burial depth shown on this section is misleading and should be modified to indicate a variable burial depth. b. The GeoEngineers' report recommends a minimum 18-inch zone of select backfill adjacent to basement/retaining walls. The 1-foot wide zone noted on Section D-D should be modified to reflect the GeoEngineers' recom- mendation and highlighted so that it will be apparent to the contractor. In our opinion, material specifica- tions and compaction requirements for wall backfill should be noted on the Plans. C. The footing burial depth could be in excess of 4 feet in places. The design, as shown, has no soil restraint at the interim base of the footing. We suggest that GeoEngineers re-evaluate the present design to verify that it complies with their design recommendations. Also, our review of the structural engineer's calcula- tions did not reveal that sliding or overturning had not been evaluated during the design of ,,foundations. Since onsite soils are silty and the footing drain may introduce or intercept water at the soil/foundation contact, we are concerned that inward yielding of the 6 • 0 footing could occur, especially in areas where a substantial thickness of exterior wall backfill is present. 7) The use of native vegetation in lieu of irrigated lawn or irrigated landscaped areas should be encouraged wherever possible on marginally stable hillsides. In our opinion, this recommendation should be provided to the owner and incorporated by the designer. Construction during the dryer summer months should be encouraged at this site. Also, we recommend a preconstruction meeting attended, by the designer and geotechnical engineer to cover items such as: 1) temporary and permanent erosion control, 2) depth of excavation for footings, 3) site preparation, 4) filling for the driveway, 5) ways to mitigate weather impacts, 6) schedule for onsite geotechnical visits, 7) quality of imported fill for use as wall backfill, and 8) compaction requirements and techniques. Please call if additional review services are required for this project. WDE/sg No. 74-04.01 6 copies submitted attachment C o Very truly yours, LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. William D. Evans, CPG Senior Geologist And 4CA41)0— David A. Pischer, P.E. • 0 REFERENCES Burlington Northern Railroad Application for Pipeline Permit. November 15, 1988. Burlington Northern Railroad, Response to Application for Pipeline Permit. November 29, 1988. City of Edmonds, Landslide Hazard Map (proposed building site not identified on map). July 25, 1984. Covenant to Notify, submitted by Clyde A. and Janice L. Miller. November 28, 1968. Dovetail Structures (structural engineer). Structural calcula- tions for the Leufken residence, Edmonds, Washington. Job Number 88-206, 7 pages. November 14, 1988. Environmental Checklist submitted by Clyde A. Miller. Date prepared: December 12, 1988. GeoEngineers, Inc., Geotechnical declaration, December 22, 1988. GeoEngineers, Inc., Report, Geotechnical Consultation Residential Site, 16300 Block 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington. File Number 1403-01-2. September 20, 1988. Group Four, Inc., Hydrology Calculations, Clyde Miller, Edmonds, Washington. Group Four Job Number 88-4549. November 30, 1988. Group Four, Inc., Grading and Drainage Plan for Clyde Miller. Sheet 1 of 1, Job Number 88-4549. January 4, 1989. Indemnity and Hold Harmless Agreement, submitted by Clyde and Janice Miller. November 28, 1988. One set of building plans prepared by Michael W. Pederson, AIA, for the Miller residence. Sheets A71 through A-9. December 22, 1988. Pederson, Michael W., AIA. Architects Declaration, December 12,. 1988. 890-199 CITY OF EDMONDS 250- 5th AVE N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (2061 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering January 6, 1989 Mr. Michael Pederson 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 RE: S/F Residence.Miller 16320 75th Place West LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR The following information, materials or requirements are due at this time: 1. One additional copy of the topographical survey; 2. The City's official street map indicates that 10 feet of right-of-way must be dedicated to the City off of 75th Place West, (map enclosed). A quit claim deed form for the dedication is enclosed; the completed form must be signed, notarized and returned to the building division to be placed on the City Council's consent agenda; 3. A driveway slope profile is required, a sample form is enclosed; 4. The City's official sidewalk map indicates that sidewalks are required to be located along 75th Place West. The City requires that a covenant to waive protest of LID be filed with the City since the installation is not required at this time. The owner must complete the form, sign, notarize and return to the building division for filing with Snohomish County; 5. Height calculations are required, handout enclosed; 6. Additional plan check fees of $200 are due at this time; 7. The owners liability statement is required, see page 2 #1(d) of the Meadowdale checklist handout, copy enclosed; • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Mr. Michael Pederson Page Two January 6, 1988 8. A notice of application must be immediately posted and maintained at the site at each street frontage of the lot. The City recommends a freestanding wood sign structure, maximum size 10 square feet. The sign must indicate that an application for permit has been filed with the City, and the date should be clearly indicated. The owner is required to complete an affidavit of poster once the sign is installed, obtain form from building division. This sign must remain until occupancy of the structure is granted; 9. A tree cutting plan prepared by a registered forester or landscape designer is required; 10. Once the contractor for the project is chosen; contractor information, including a state contractor's license number must be provided. The contractor must post general public liability insurance with the City; (See page 9 #10 (b) of the checklist) 11. A surety bond or cash deposit must be posted with the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The amount of this bond will be determined by your geotechnical engineer's cost estimate for the project based on site restoration, potential slide damage to on and off site property during construction, and to ensure the completion and/or restoration of the work or site; (See page 9 #10 (a) of the checklist) 12. The owner prior to issuance of the permit, shall provide the City with a copy of public liability insurance to be in effect for 11 years. The amount of insurance will be partially based on the geotechnical engineer's cost estimates as well as a review by the owners insurance agency. The fiqure should reflect repair and replacement costs based on the potential loss to both public and private property, which could be attributable to this development. This amount should be broken down but not limited to the following categories; new dwelling, adjacent structures, personal property, public property, loss of use, medical payments and personal liability. The amount of insurance must be approved by the Community Services Director; Please be advised the permit application will not be considered 100% complete until all of the materials are accepted and approved by the City. The review process may be affected if materials are not submitted to the City in a timely manner. If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202. Thank you, Hal Reeves Building Official +� .-n*.at�n.�•�`tiro`Mc-.�y^r'G'�;1%j•.v!�'Se'i'�„'�W^�VCr�i.-�k'Mai'a•4+�'�"l���tT1%u�""'Y�+�O7 d � °�'�F��Ci`r4`'s-Nw.f�.'ti-�` : „J4n< jar:.�y,$7uTM�Q'd�ttw5s5u•.1�""�a� +�P4i�4 a�'Sr•��' �+� �+•.5 CITY OF EDMONDS Permit No. ' 9 — 06 1 ,�' jc-MMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT, OF- WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date �— 9 A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas CotMM3E C Ir j n ctor: IligeMercerStreet Name Mie (Address WA 98111 t " x 1 ISV I Mailing Address City State Zip ENGINEERING City State Zip STREET FILE State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16310 75 Place West Type of Work to be Done: Install New Service D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ® Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y Q N F. • Size of Cut: X No Cuts APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature)to this application; agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or.descripp�t o hatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its depaitments4r Qk I yes, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason'of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS. FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING. THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. L understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. me Signature: February 15, 1991 Date: Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: $IN PERMIT FEE: Time Authorized: Void after YEA ES days. Restoration Fee: Special Conditions: NA Receipt No.: RELEASED BY: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dime INSPECTED BY ate NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE FIELD INSPECTION NO S (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) I hew. `- r� Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P'.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ❑ NO Eng. Div. July 1985 1 Co310 '15 �, �nf Addendum to: City of Edmonds Permit Application Engineering Aide Kerry Walsh Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 x 2588 DI CITY OF EDMONDS LLB" NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ RETIREMENT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION -e L� SERIAL NO. LOCATION � � O ..y.-� q� n � DEPT. NO. * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST * PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 10 " S COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. ``� oVc) —ot ` 3 / S -3 ESTIMATED LIFE INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY * "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST .*SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT rH�c;t55tu BATCH NO. �75 T% PL - Gc� REPORT GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTATION RESIDENTIAL SITE 16300 BLOCK, 75TH PLACE WEST . MEADOWDALE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR MR. BUD J. LEUFKENS Geo C:P� Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Dear Mr. Leufkens: September 20, 1988 Report' Geotechnical Consultation Residential Site 16300 Block, 75th Place West Meadowdale Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 INTRODUCTION Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists This letter presents our conclusions and recommendations relative to development of a residential site in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington. The property is located in the 16300 block of 75th Place West. Our services for this project are provided in general accordance with our agreement dated August 5, 1988; our work was authorized by you on August 8, 1988. The site is located west of 75th Place West, between that street and the Burlington Northern railroad right—of—way which parallels the shoreline of Puget.Sound in this area. It includes Lots 5 and 6 of Block 60 of the plat of Meadowdale Beach and is shown in Figure 1. We under- stand that you are considering selling the property and that you need information regarding geotechnical conditions that may influence resi- dential development of the site. GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140tli Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 Geo Enoneers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 2 The purpose of our work is to provide you with information regarding geotechnical conditions at the site pertinent to residential development in accordance with City of Edmonds Building Department requirements. Specifically, our work includes: 1. Exploration of shallow subsurface conditions at the site by means of test pits. 2. Review of information pertaining to past landslides which may influence development plans for the site. 3. Evaluation of the stability of the soils at the site in accordance with the criteria required by the City of Edmonds. 4. General recommendations for site development, including site grading, foundation support, site drainage and erosion controls. Our work has been performed on the basis of a -review of existing information, .surface reconnaissance of the site and adjacent areas, observations of water levels in nearby ground water monitoring wells, exploration of subsurface conditions at the site by means of four test pits excavated. using a tractor -mounted backhoe, and our experience. We have utilized a topographic map of the site prepared by Group Four, Inc., and dated August 30, 1988. Assumptions regarding the location and construction of the proposed residence are based'on discussions with you and Mr. Clyde Miller. No specific building plans have been -developed -at the time of our study. A site evaluation checklist relating this report to the requirements of UBC 2905 is attached as Appendix A. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is located downslope of 75th Place West, between that street and the Burlington Northern right-of-way along the Puget Sound shoreline. The property. slopes moderately downward to the west, ranging from approximately Elevation 80 along 75th Place West to approximately Elevation 40 along the railroad right-of-way boundary. The ground surface within the' site generally slopes downward to the west-northwest at an G e o lEngtneers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 3 inclination of approximately 20 percent, except along the shoulder of 75th Place West where it locally slopes approximately13O percent for a few feet in height (see Figure 1). A relatively level, regraded area near the northwest corner of the property is bounded on the east by a roughly 4-foot-high, west -facing cut. A steep (approximately 1.5H:1V) west -facing slope approximately. 15 to 20 feet high along the west property boundary separates the site from the Burlington Northern railroad tracks. There are no buildings or other improvements on the lot at this time. Most of the site is presently vegetated by grass, with a number of small deciduous trees in the eastern portion of the property. Brush is present mainly near the top of the cut slope in the northwest portion of the property and along an abandoned drainageway that traverses the property from east to west. The ground surface,throughout the site was dry at the time of our surface reconnaissance and subsurface explorations; no evidence of recent surface water runoff was observed within the drain- ageway. The proposed single family residence will be located near the southwest corner of the site, at the approximate location shown in Figure 1. The residence will be of wood frame construction with a daylight basement. The lowest floor will be at approximately Elevation 46 and an approximately 10- to 12-foot cut will be required along the'east wall of the building. We understand that the actual location of the proposed residence may be adjusted slightly to accommodate final design. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating four test pits using a tractor -mounted backhoe. A representative from our firm observed the excavations and classified the soils encountered. The logs of the test pits are shown -in Figure 2. Subsurface conditions at the site generally consist of 3 to 5 feet of brown silty sand and sandy silt, overlying stiff gray silt. The upper 3 feet of the brown silty sand and sandy silt is generally loose or soft. The underlying gray silt increases in hardness with depth. No ground water seepage was observed in any of the test pits. Geo �1 'd Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 4 HISTORY The site is located within the Meadowdale landslide complex, an area in which large and small earth movements have been documented in the last 40 years, and in which movement has undoubtedly been occurring for many centuries. This area is .the subject of a landslide hazards report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. (Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investiga— tion, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, dated October 16, 1979); two of the undersigned were the authors of that report. The site which is the subject of this consultation is located in an area classified in the 1979 RLAI report as 114A90". This designation identifies a landslide hazard from movement of previously failed material, indicates that the failure would likely include a considerable depth of material, and that there was a 90 percent probability of such a failure occurring during a 25-year period. A landslide encompassing the subject property is known to have occurred during the winter of 1946-47. This movement involved an area extending from approximately 220 feet south to approximately 500 feet north of the subject site. The headscarp was located approximately 400 feet east of the Burlington Northern tracks. The 1979 landslide hazards map was developed on the basis of conditions that existed prior to construction of the Meadowdale sewer and storm drainage project. The relative landslide hazard was reevaluated in 1985 by our firm and we concluded that the conditions which exist today are less hazardous,. due primarily to a declining water table resulting from installation of storm and sanitary sewer. However, some risk of landsliding still exists. We concluded that in 1985 the risk of land - sliding, as classified in the RLAI report, had been reduced to an approxi- mate 30 percent probability of failure in a 25-year period. Observations of ground water levels in nearby monitoring wells during the course of this consultation confirm that the water table in the vicinity of the site has declined to levels commensurate with this lower risk. Geo0A 1Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL In our opinion, the site can be developed for a residence provided adequate care and practice in the design and construction of drainage, earthwork, structural walls and foundations are employed. These measures will make the site more expensive to develop than for a similar house on a lot without the conditions and history of earth movements that occur at the site. Construction in accordance with the recommendations provided below will not reduce the stability of the site or adjacent areas during or following site development. The material that underlies the site has previously failed in at least one large-scale landslide. The risk of reoccurrence of such a landslide has been reduced due to a declining water table in the area. This water table decline has been caused, at least in part, by implementa- tion of a storm and sanitary sewer system. The risk reduction will remain effective as long as the overall storm and sanitary drainage system is operational. The risk level may, in fact, continue to decline, becoming more prevalent as development progresses with more efficient drainage measures. The recommendations in this report are directed toward avoiding localized slope stability problems and minimizing damage to the proposed residence in the event that significant movements occur. We recommend that footings for the residence be set back at least 25 feet from the top of slope indicated along the west property boundary. This setback provides a margin of relatively level ground adjacent to the residence and provides distance between the house and any minor debris slides that may occur along the steep slope within the Burlington Northern railroad right-of-way. No fill should be placed within 10 feet of the existing top of slope. Site grading should not result in the ground surface being raised or lowered more than 3 feet from existing elevations except within the foundation area of the house. Geoff Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 6 SITE DRAINAGE No springs or surface water drainage appears to presently occur within the site. The abandoned drainageway indicated on the plot plan appears not to have carried surface water in recent years. The storm drain that previously crossed beneath 75th Place West and emptied into the head of the drainageway appears to have been truncated during construction of the sanitary sewer along 75th Place West. Surface water runoff generated within the site from roof and other impervious surfaces must be collected and conducted via a tightline off the site to the west so as to pass beneath the Burlington Northern railroad tracks via the existing culvert. If a tightline is constructed down the slope, it must be designed and constructed to accommodate some surficial movements without danger of pulling apart or rupturing. Ground water was not encountered in our test pits and is not expected to be present in sufficient quantity to require a system of subsurface drains other than the footing drains recommended below in conjunction with subsurface walls. Water from the footing drains must be conducted offsite in a tightline as noted above. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK The surface soils within the site contain substantial silt and are moisture —sensitive. These soils will absorb moisture during wet weather and, when wet, are easily disturbed during construction and difficult 'or impossible to compact. We therefore recommend that site grading and earthwork be done only during periods of dry weather. Site preparation for the building and paved areas should include stripping the surface soil and removing any organic soil. The excavated soil should not be stored, even temporarily, in the zone between the house and the crest of the steep western bank. After stripping and any excavation, soft areas should be recompacted or excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. Geo�Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens' September 20, 1988 Page 7 The soils within the upland portion of the site have a high potential for erosion during construction where the soils are disturbed by con- struction activities. This applies particularly to temporary or permanent fill. Erosion controls will be necessary and should include the proper control of surface water runoff, minimizing the time of exposure in the area stripped during construction, and prompt redegetation. Erosion control measures should be in place around the perimeter of the site prior to any other earthwork on site. Prior to placing any structural fill, all vegetation and topsoil should be removed. Exposed surface should then be compacted to a firm, nonyielding condition. Where fill is placed on an existing slope, the fill should be keyed. in by cutting level benches so that the contact between the fill and existing ground is horizontal. Any structural fill placed on the site should be placed in level lifts not more than 12 inches in loose thickness, properly conditioned and compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density in accordance with the ASTM A-1557 method, unless otherwise specified below. All structural fill should be free of debris and organic contam- inants. The suitability of material for use as fill will depend on the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the amount of fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate com- paction becomes more difficult to achieve. We recommend that structural fill for placement in wet weather consist of free -draining sand and gravel containing no more than 5 percent fines. Material with more fines may be used during dry weather. Areas receiving nonstructural fill for lawns or landscaping should be cleared of vegetation and soft areas compacted to a. firm condition by rolling.. Nonstructural fill should be placed in level lifts not more than 12 inches thick and compacted to a dense condition. The fill surface should be sloped to drain efficiently. Geoff Engineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 8 FOUNDATION SUPPORT We recommend that structural design of the foundation consider the possibility that future ground movement may occur. This movement could consist of an irregular subsidence of the ground and/or differential downslope movement. To accommodate possible ground movement, we recommend that continuous spread footings be of sufficient stiffness to allow loss of support over a horizontal distance of 20 feet with minimal deflection, and that the foundation design allow for loss of support at any one isolated spread footing. The design should be such that releveling can be accomplished if necessary. Alternatively, protection of the house against potential future damage by ground movement can be, accomplished by designing the entire house and foundation system as a "rigid box.". This design concept would permit"rotation or displacement of the entire structure without sustaining structural damage. This technique would require substantial bracing and stiffening of the structure and, in our opinion, might not be cost— effective. We recommend that the house be supported on spread footings founded directly on the stiff gray silt that underlies the site, or on structural fill supported by the stiff gray silt. If structural fill is used beneath the footings, it should extend a distance on each side of the footing, equal to the depth of fill. All structural fill should be placed and compacted as specified above. The minimum depth of embedment for all footings should be 18 inches below the nearest adjacent exterior grade. We recommend minimum footing widths of 18 inches and 24 inches for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. For foundations designed and constructed as recommended, an allowable bearing pressure of 2000.pounds per square foot may be used. For retaining walls, an average bearing value of 2000 psf may be used and maximum edge pressures should be below 3000 psf. This value applies to the total of dead and long—term live loads exclusive of the weight of the footings and any overlying tit Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page' 9 backfill. We estimate that footing settlements resulting from structural loads will be less than 1/2 inch, total and differential. RETAINING WALLS The basement walls for the proposed residence function as retaining walls and should be designed as such. For design of semi -rigid retaining walls at the site (i.e., basement walls), we recommend an active lateral pressure equivalent to a fluid density of 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming level backfill compacted'and drained as outlined below. If the backfill surface slopes no steeper than 20 percent upward away from the wall, a lateral soil pressure value of 65 pcf should be used. The above lateral soil pressures assume the walls will be backfilled with clean, free -draining sand or sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). This drainage zone should be at least 18 inches thick horizontally. The drainage material and remaining backfill placed behind the wall and not supporting struc- tural elements should be compacted to approximately 90 percent of the maximum dry density. Heavy compaction equipment should not be operated within 5 feet of the retaining walls. A permanent subsurface drainage system should be installed at the base of all subsurface walls. These subdrains should consist of rigid, smooth -wall, 4-inch-diameter (minimum) perforated PVC pipe bedded in pea gravel. The pea gravel should extend a minimum of 6 inches below and above the pipe. The drainpipe should discharge into tightlines and be disposed of as described under "SITE DRAINAGE." Roof drains or other collected surface water runoff should not .discharge into the subsurface drains, but could be collected and routed into the tight discharge lines. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction on the base of the footing and by passive resistance on the face of the footings. Frictional resistance can. be determined using 0.5 for the coefficient of friction. Passive resistance may be determined using an equivalent fluid pressure of 325 pcf, providing the backfill surface is level and footings are poured GeoEngineers Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 10 neat against native soil. The above values are based on a factor of safety of 1.0. We recommend that a factor of safety of at least 1.3 for sliding and overturning be used for design. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared his report for your use and your design representa- tives in planning and design for residential development of this site. Specific design details of the proposed residence are not. available at this time. When the design has been finalized, we. recommend that we be retained to review the final design and specifications to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions from those observed in the explorations, and also with time. We recommend that a contingency for unanticipated conditions be included in the budget and schedule for the project. We recommend that our firm be retained during construction to confirm the conditions indicated by the explorations or to provide additional recommendations based on the conditions revealed during the work. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. - 0 0 o - `% �iCUMEI1111eePS Mr. Bud J. Leufkens September 20, 1988 Page 11 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. �/ Dona d W. Tubbs i. Senior Geologist Nancy L. Tochko �,� •�Fc��n�k; ,.;� Project Engineer AI���'\� Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Attachments Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Clyde Miller Copyright O 1988 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved co Go Zo rn 6 LOG OF TEST PIT DEPTH BELOW GROUP SOIL GROUND SURFACE CLASSIFICATION (FEET) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TEST PIT 1 0 - 3.0 ML MOTTLED BROWN AND BROWNISH GRAY SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (SOFT, MOIST) 3.0 - 4.0 SM MOTTLED BROWN AND REDDISH BROWN FINE SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 4.0 - 8.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 8.0 - 12.0 ML GRADES TO VERY STIFF, DAMP, LAMINATED 12.0 - 14.0 ML GRADES TO HARD, LAMINATED WITH FINE SAND TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 14.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 2 0 - 2.5 ML BROWN SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS (SOFT, DAMP) 2.5 - 3.5 SM REDDISIt BROWN SAND WITH SILT (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 3.5 - 8.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 8.0 - 15.0 ML GRADES TO DAMP TEST PIT COMPLETED.AT 15.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 3 0 - 2.5 ML MOTTLED BROWN SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS (SOFT, MOIST). 2.5 - 4.5 SM REDDISH BROWN TO GRAYISH BROWN SAND WITH SILT AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 4.5 - 12.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) 12.0 - 14.0 ML GRADES TO VERY STIFF, DAMP 14.0 - 16.0 ML GRADES TO HARD TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 16.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED TEST PIT 4 0 - 3.0 SM-ML MOTTLED BROWN SILTY SAND AND GRAY SANDY SILT WITH ROOTS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (LOOSE TO SOFT, DAMP TO MOIST) 3.0 - 5.0 SM GRAYISH BROWN SAND WITH SILT AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, DAMP) 5.0 - 16.0 ML GRAY SILT (STIFF, MOIST) TEST PIT COMPLETED AT 16.0 FEET ON 8/18/88 NO GROUND WATER SEEPAGE OBSERVED THE DEPTHS ON THE TEST PIT LOGS, ALTHOUGH SHOWN TO 0.1 FEET, ARE BASED ON AN AVERAGE OF MEASUREMENTS ACROSS THE TEST PIT AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE TO 0.5 FEET. gAi,.. GeU Eligineers LOG OF TEST PIT FIGURE 2 Geo�E. Engineers A P P E N D I X A SITE EVALUATION CHECKLIST UBC REQUIREMENT 1. Plot plan 2. Description of materials 3. Water table 4. Foundation recommendations 5. Differential settlement RESPONSE See Figure 1 See Figure 2 and SITE CONDITIONS Not encountered See FOUNDATION SUPPORT See FOUNDATION SUPPORT 0 F- Iu w LL_ o N z O � J `t O' Q O z O O W m D u z O o - d z O vl Q F- W > LL W /saMFW- oa/d Q a U co 03 M 17 LLJ F- Q U w u z IS CY uJ IL IL S8•91-1, Nl3:1Md z•lo•fohl eo � ,,Engineers Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 8623 — 204th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98020 - Dear Mr. Miller: December 22, 1988 ConsuitingGcotcchnical Engineers and Geologists Geotechnical Declaration Meadowdale Permit Submittal Checklist Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 We have reviewed the building plans and specifications for the proposed Miller residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated December 22., 1988. In our judgment, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington's and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment, the risk of damage to the.proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately. 30 percent within a 25—year period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report. on —site design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to the residence include structural stiffening Geohigineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NP,, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fix. (200) 746.5(Ks A GeU�Engineers Mr. Clyde Miller, December 22, 1988 Page 2 to strengthen the structure against possible ground movement and incor— porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present needs. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. 51 r��.;•p.E`".i�1� '`L Dona d W. Tubbs, �R d °`) y Senior Geologist t%/ iCr: �2 y Li�.�L0/6 t0�. C�`�� f! F"-•.•!SI4�;;" �;,' r'�Nancy L. Tochko s ONAL Project Engineer Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Copyright © 1988 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved Geo0 Engineers k Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Pederson: March 8, 1989 Confirmation of Discussions Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98020 File No. 1403-01-2 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists This letter confirms several points which we discussed with you yesterday during our review of your revised building plans and specifications, dated March 7, 1989, for the proposed Miller residence in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds. The revised plans implement a number of changes suggested by Landau Associates Inc. in their letter of January 12, 1989, and also several reccmmendations which we provided to you during the course of our review. The revised plans indicate a sand filter surrounding the footing drains, and contain specifications for the drain and backfill materials. It.is our opinion that the footing drain design specified can adequately provide long term drainage at -this site. It is our opinion that cutting of the trees on the slope between the street and the location of the proposed residence .,rill not significantly decrease the stability of that slope, provided that the slope is promptly revegetated with ornamental or native vegetation having similar ground cover and root strength characteristics. The proposed location of the driveway crossing the slope appears to minimize the amount of slope disturbance required by site access. We have recommended against alternative driveway layouts that would increase the disturbed area. of the slope. GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (200) 746-5068 02% Geoff1,4'10' Engineers ,1 Michael. Pederson, AIA March 8, 1989 Page 2 We trust that this letter meets your presents needs. If you have any questions regarding this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist DWT: dk Three copies submitted GeoEngineers R, Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller: March 8, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists G'eotechnical Declaration Meadowdale Permit Submittal Checklist_ Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington. File No. 1403-01-2 We have reviewed the revised building plans and specifications for the proposed Miller residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated March 7, 1989. In our judgment, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment, the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately 30 percent within a 25-year .period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report. On -site design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to the residence include structural stiffening Geolingineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax,(206) 746-5068 s a i Mr. Clyde Miller March 8, 1989 Page 2 to strengthen the structure against possible ground movement and incor- porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present needs. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs, Ph.D. Senior Geologist Nancy L. Tochko Project Engineer on W. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327. Thompson'Falls, Montana 59873 Copyright © 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved Geok"I'M f:ngincers Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 SERVICES AGREEMENT File No. 1757-001-BO2 Consufliug Gcolechnical F.nlhneers and Geologists This confirms the agreement between Clyde A. Miller and GeoEngineers, Inc. for construction monitoring services for the Miller residence to be constructed at 16310 - 75th Place West in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds, Washington. The services provided by GeoEngineers, Inc. will consist of: 1. Monitoring of geotechnical aspects of construction for compliance with the recommendations in our report dated September 20, 1988. 2. Providing consultation as requested to help solve any geotechnical problems that may develop. 3. Submitting geotechnical field reports on a weekly basis to the building official and other parties designated by you. 4. Submitting a final construction report to the building official indicating the compliance of the project with the recommendations in our September 20 report and other geotechnical requirements. The professional services listed above will be provided in accordance with the terms described in the attached General Conditions which is.a part of this agreement. The fee for the services described above will be determined on a time -and -expense basis using the rates indicated on the attached Schedule of Charges. Total fees are estimated to be in the range of $2,000 to $3,000. We will strive to keep our charges to a minimum commensurate with the level of involvement described above. We will keep you advised of our charges and inform you of any potential overruns prior to exceeding the estimated amount. GeoEngineers, Inc. By The services described above are authorized by: y _ *Authorizing Signature Typed or Printed Name Date ,� , /, Z �, i 9 8g Date *Individual with contracting authority and responsible for payment of GeoEngineers, Inc. services. Please Return One Signed Copy of This Agreement For Our Files Attachments 0-,oEiiomxrs, Inc. 2405140th ,,Wc. NI?, Suitr 10S ISrlle� ur.1CA 9800i 1elephtme (2(9)} 746 5200 { Fax. 206 740-5(XR rr, 9�1((��IIA,-�,.: Ins iY '7 •j y .2{ � =01 w t I1 giIU-er' Mr. Clyde Miller C/o Michael Pederson, AIA 535 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller.: March 8, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Geotechnical Declaration Meadowdale Permit Submittal Checklist Miller Residence 16300 .Block, 75th Place West :Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-0.1-2 We have reviewed the revised building plans and specifications for the proposed M.illor residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael. W. Pederson and dated March 7, 1989. In our judgm(-,nt, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdal.e, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment,•the, risk of. damage to the proposed development., or to adjacent. properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately 30 percent within a 25—year period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report. 011—sit.e design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to We residence include structural stiffening (d'1)I'.11�;111t7'I'ti, Inc. M05 HMh AVE Nr low H6 lidlevile. kV'A 4g005 1ehphone( *) 745 Ox) Fax. (2(x)j 746-5(X,tt Mr. Clyde Miller March 8, 1989 Page.2 to strengthen the structure against: possible ground movement and incor— porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present. needs. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. '.fuljbs, Ph.D. Senior. Geologist Nancy L. Tochko Project Engineer `Jlon W. Koloski Principal DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Copyright © 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved . EJ_7 ........ -.....tee.... ''' GcoLllgincers December 22, 1988 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Mr. Clyde Miller c/o Michael Pederson, AIA 8623 — 204th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Miller: Geotechnical Declaration ti• Meadowdale Permit Submittal. Checklist Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1403-01-2 e We have reviewed the building plans and specifications for the proposed Miller residence in Edmonds prepared by Michael W. Pederson and dated December 22, 1988- In our judgment, the plans and specifications conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, .Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Block, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. In our judgment, the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal, subject to the conditions set forth in our report, and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. As noted in our report, the subjective probability of earth movement at the site is approximately 30 percent within a 25—year period. We believe that this probability will remain approximately the same or will Slightly decrease after the residence has been constructed following the guidelines outlined our report:.. On —site design measures recommended to mitigate the slide hazard to the residence include structural stiffening Gtvlin�;ini•rc�, Int•. 2405 14011) Avr. NE. Suilc 10 . lidlet-Iw. OVA 98005 Tdchhone (?00) 7,t6-530u Fax. (2(k) 746-50(,8 t --,Geoo Engineers Mr. Clyde Miller December 22, 1988 Page 2 to strengthen the structure against possible ground movement and incor— porating surface water and footing drains into the design for the residence. We trust this letter meets your present needs. ZV 330 �.F.li� Off. !' � El �: M� •� R(� 0rlAL DWT:NLT:JWK:wd Three copies submitted cc: Mr. Bud J. Leufkins P.O. Box 1327 Thompson Falls, Montana 59873 Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. S Dona d W. Tubbs, Senior Geologist Nancy ! Tochko Project Engineer Joni W. KoloSki Principal. Copyright o 1988 GeoEngineers, Inc., All Rights Reserved Geo 9%Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North. Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: August 3, 1989 Uc-4199 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists We have been retained by Mr. Clyde A. Miller to perform construction monitoring for compliance with our recommendations relative to his residence at 16310 - 75th Place West, in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds. In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing Field Reports describing our observations during the period from July 28 through August 1, 1989. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd Attachments cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 s GeoEngineers Inc. FIELD REPORT rf1757-001-B02 2405 - 140th Ave. N.E. Project: Date: Bellevue, WA 98005 Clyde Miller Residence 7/28/89 (206) 746-5200 Owner: Report No. Clyde A. Miller 1 Prepared by: Location: Arrival Time: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale 5:45 pm 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Depart. Time: Permit No. Initial Site Meeting Sunny 6:15 pm I met Clyde Miller at the site and he provided me with a signed copy of our services agreement. Equipment present at the site was a Komatsu PS20OLC excavator and a Dresser TD-8D bulldozer. Gary Goodnight, the general contractor, was operating the excavator at the time of my arrival. . I introduced myself to Gary and provided him with a business card, and with my home telephone number. I explained to Gary that we would be inspecting for compliance with the recommendations contained in our report, and the geotechnical aspects specified on the plans and specifications prepared by the architect, Mike Peterson. I explained that it was important that these recommendations, plans and specifications be followed explicitly and that he should read them carefully. Gary indicated that he would be working on Saturday, and I told him that I would return on Saturday afternoon to inspect the excavation at that time. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of trio contractor. his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: G EI 45-87 FIELD REPORT i uc tvv. 1757-001- GeoEngineers Inc. 2405 - 140th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Prepared by: Donald W. Tubbs Purpose of Visit: Initial Site Inspection Project: Clyde Miller Residence Owner: Clyde A. Miller Location: Arrival Time: Meadowdale 2:10 pm Weather: Depart. Time: Sunny 3:30 pm 7/29/89 Report No. 2 1 of 2 Brmit No. Neither Gary Goodnight nor any of his employees were at the site at the time I arrived. However, Gary had been operating the excavator in the area near the southwest corner of the excavation when I had driven by the site earlier, at approximately 2 p.m. The site has been cleared of trees and also of other vegetation in the vicinity of the foundation excavation. Considerable bulldozing has been done throughout the remainder of the site, to provide access from the street to the site and also in other areas for reasons that are not apparent. Neither the cut nor the fill slopes along the access driveway exceed 3 feet in height. Bulldozing has also been performed on the adjacent property to the south, owned by Mr. Perides. This includes construction of an equipment access route across Mr. Perides' property to the Miller property. The contractor has placed a string line along the approximate top of slope for his reference. Some excavated material has been stockpiled in the area between the excavation and the top of slope. The stockpiled material is locally 3 to 4 feet in thickness. A small quantity of material (roughly 1 cubic yard) has been pushed into the area of blackberry bushes west of the top -of -slope line. It appears that the area of the daylight basement has been excavated to or below the floor grade. The walls of the excavation range in height from approximately 4 feet along the western boundary to approximately 8 feet along the eastern boundary of the excavation. The west wall of the excavation is sloped at approximately 1:1 to allow access for equipment, and the remaining three walls are nearly vertical. The north wall of the excavation exposes reddish -brown silty sand and gray sandy silt which appears to be native material but which has been deformed by past ground movement. The material ranges in consistency from loose to medium dense, and from soft to stiff. The material on the floor of the pit, which has been disturbed by the mechanized equipment, is generally soft in consistency and could easily be penetrated by a probe rod to a depth of 1 foot to 18 inches. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our.observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: G E 145-87 File No. 1757-001-B02 July 29, 1989 Page 2 Within the east wall of the excavation, a buried ground surface is exposed which slopes downward to the south. Material below that surface is similar to the material in the north wall of the excavation. The material above that surface is a heterogeneous Swale -fill consisting of silt and sand and including large wood fragments. Locally, particularly near the south end of the wall, this material is wet and seepage emerges onto the pit floor. Near the south end of the east wall of the excavation, caving has caused the top of the excavation to retreat approximately 4 feet. The soils on the floor of the excavation adjacent to the east wall. particularly near its south end, are wet and soft and standing water is locally present. These soils were easily penetrated to a depth of 2 to 2-1/2 feet using a steel probe. The soils along the south wall of the excavation also appear to be fill, but are sandier in character and not as wet. The soils on the floor of the excavation adjacent to the south wall could generally be penetrated to a depth of 2 feet using the steel probe. Near the southwest corner of the excavation, immediately outside the footing area,.the contractor has excavated a trench/sump; no water was present in that trench at the time of my site visit. FIELD REPORT GeoEngineers Inc. 1757-001-B02 2405 - 140th Ave. N.E. Project: Date: Bellevue, WA 98005 Clyde Miller Residence 8 1 89 (206) 746-5200 Owner: Report No. Clyde A. Miller 3 Prepared by: Location: Arrival Time: Page: Jon Koloski Meadowdale, WA 14:30 1 of 2 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Depart. Time: Permit No. Observe Foundation Excavation Ptly Cloudy,70-(showers) 16:00 This site visit was performed by Don Tubbs and Jon Koloski in response to questions from Gary Goodnight (excavation contractor). While on site, DWT and JWK met with Clyde Miller and Gary Goodnight . At this time, the basement area for the house has been excavated. The excavation extends about 4 feet outside of the basement wall line and is 4 to 5 feet below the basement floor grade. The excavation in its present configuration was dug July 28 and 29. A shallow ditch.extends from the southwest corner of the excavation to daylight. The soil conditions encountered in the excavation are described in field report No. 2. The floor of the existing excavation is wet and soft. Water is emerging from the floor and from the excavation walls a few inches above the floor. Some caving of the excavation walls has occurred, particularly at the south end of the east wall where the soil stands about 7 feet vertical. Our recommendations are as follows: 1. Clean the remaining soil from the excavation floor with the excavator backhoe by working from outside of the excavation. Do not run equipment on the floor of the excavation. 2. Cover the floor of the excavation with a single layer of nonwoven filter geotextile such as Mirafi 140N. The filter fabric should extend 1 to 2 feet up the excavation walls. 3. Install a drainline from the southeast corner of the excavation floor, extending out the trench at the southwest corner. That drainline should be a perforated, 4-inch minimum diameter, rigid PVC pipe. It should be covered with a single layer of nonwoven geotextile similar to that used on the excavation floor. 4. Install the initial lift of imported granular backfill. The backfill gradation should conform with the specifications for wet -weather structural fill described in the soils report. The initial lift should be installed 2 feet minimum to 3 feet maximum thickness and must be installed without running equipment on the floor of the excavation. Once the initial lift is in place, it may be compacted using a small self-propelled or tow -behind compactor. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: G EI 45-87 File No. 1757-001-B02 8/l/89 Page 2 5. Install subsequent lifts of excavation backfill at a maximum 1-foot loose thickness with each lift being compacted to 95 percent as specified in the soils report. Note it may be necessary to moisture -condition the fill in order to achieve adequate compaction. This structural fill should extend to the basement slab subgrade; wall and interior footings should be reexcavated as required on the design drawings. The backfill subdrain described above must be separate from the required footing drains described in the soils report. Each drain system must be installed so water carried by one system cannot back up into the other system. We understand the -contractor plans to remove waste fill from the basement excavation before importing backfill material. We should be notified at least one day in advance of placing the imported backfill so we can schedule our inspection accordingly. qj Geo %Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: August 11, 1989 AUG 14 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from August 2 through August 8, 1989. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 ��j FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-B02 Geo pwEngineers Project: ' Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 8/8/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 4 Prepared B r� P Y: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs t :t, Meadowdale 1045 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe Foundation Excavation Sunny f�, 1200 AUG 14:1989 Clyde Miller and the contractor were at the site when I arrived. The excavated material which had previously been stockpiled between the excavation and the top of the slope has been removed. Filter fabric has been placed on the floor of the excavation in the basement area. Four -inch smooth -wall, perforated drainpipe wrapped with filter fabric has been installed along the south side of the excavation, below the filter fabric. I explained to the contractor that the drainpipe should be installed above the filter fabric within the backfill. He began replacing the drainpipe above the filter fabric'while I was at the site. I examined the stockpiled sand that the contractor proposes to use as free - draining backfill and as structural fill. The material consists of moderately well -graded, coarse sand with a mean particle size of approximately one millimeter. I estimated the percent fines to be less than 2 percent. While I was at the site, a truck operated by one of the contractor's employees arrived at the site with another load of the sand and dumped it at the northeast corner of the excavation. I also inspected the excavated areas for the southern portion of the house and for.the garage. The soils in the area of the southern portion of the house were penetrated using a steel probe to a depth of approximately 1 foot. This area is presently excavated to about 1 foot below the footing grade and will be backfilled with structural fill. Within the area of the garage, the excavation is now at approximately the elevation of the proposed footings. Probing in this.area penetrated approximately 6 inches, and no overexcavation and replacement with structural fill is necessary. The contractor said that he will notify us a day in advance of when the footings are formed and ready to pour, so we can schedule our next inspection accordingly. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: S Geo p ngineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen.: August 18, 1989 A U G 21 1999 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the .period from August 9 through August 17, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. D ald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 •*' �.(I- ti 1� � f �'� g r'S .Z`��j�°{, FL ��- � �y h•Y �.1. a ..F AY�i � i4�,'� ..r� ,y i h`t �' S'b,b ) � t, ry t -_ �� .�.::;,��• ..`� •,r,•,r.J.� �`�. a$ : �`� . >.:'::5�?.. �" .�, �'.,�. >5,�.�1a �� ,�.� . ,,�� tea;. �., .. >t Geo Isp Engineers FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-ao2 Project: Date: 2405 - 140tli Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Clyde Miller Residence 8/17/89 Owner: Clyde A. Miller Report Number: 5 Prepared By: Donald W. Tubbs Location: Meadowdale, WA Arrival: 1815 Page: 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Observe Foundation Excavation Weather: Sunny Departure: 1900 Permit Number: No workmen or equipment were at the site at the time of my inspection. Approximately 18 inches to 2 feet of clean sand, such as described in Field Report No. 4, has been placed within the basement area of the excavation. A lesser amount of fill has been placed in the southern portion of the excavation. Equipment tracks within the excavation indicate that -the fill surface has been compacted by rolling. Probing of the fill placed within the excavation indicates that it is of relatively uniform density, except near the northeast and southeast corners of the basement excavation where the fillappears to be less dense, possibly due to less effective use of the roller compactor in these corner areas. During a telephone conversation earlier this afternoon, the contractor indicated that additional compaction will be,performed and that approximately one more foot of fill will be placed and compacted within the basement area. Excavation has also been performed within the area of the foundation north of the basement, but no fill has been placed there yet. Some sandy fill is stockpiled near the northeast corner of the excavation. Roughly 5 cubic yards of excavated material has been pushed into the area northwest of the northwest portion of the excavation, between the excavation and the top of the adjacent slope. This material should be removed. ING AUG 211989 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: s Geo Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: August 25, 1989 b" AUG 02 8 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from August 18 through August 25, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure `cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 Yours very truly, GeoEngineers,/In1c. Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal fir I 0 ��i� FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-B02 Geo N� Engineers Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 8/25/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 6 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale, WA 1615 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe Foundation Excavation Mostly sunny 1645 No workmen or equipment were at the site at the time of my inspection. Roughly 6 to 8 inches of sandy fill has now been placed within the foundation excavation north of the basement. This fill, as well as the fill within the basement area and to the south, has been thoroughly compacted by rolling. I probed the fill with a steel rod and found it to be generally dense, except for an area of approximately 20 square feet near the southeast corner of the basement where the fill is only moderately dense. Additional compaction should be performed in this area. The fill surface is everywhere dry except for within this area, where it is wet. A small amount of seepage is presently emerging from the silt exposed in the excavation walls in this area. The fill in this area was dry during my last site visit, prior to the heavy rains of earlier this week. Two to three feet of excavated material is still present northwest of the foundation area, between the excavation and the adjacent top of slope. This material should be removed. AUG 2 81989 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: i�Bto. Geogp Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 to'1:1 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie L, Building Official Gentlemen: September 1, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from August 26 through August 30, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 Yours very truly,. GeoEngineers, Inc. D d W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal \MI Geo l�p Engineers 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Prepared By: Donald W. Tubbs Purpose of Visit: Observe Footing Excavations FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-B02 Project: Clyde Miller Residence Owner: Clyde A. Miller Location: Arrival: Meadowdale, WA 1615 Weather: Departure: Mostly cloudy 1645 Date: 8/30/89 Report Number: 7 Page: 1of1 Permit Number: At the time of my arrival a crew of four workers was working on the footing forms; a fifth worker arrived shortly thereafter and began mechanical work on the backhoe that was parked at the site. The foundation crew was trenching and setting footing forms, and preparing steel for placing within the footings. The trenching was being done by hand excavation, and the bottoms and sides of the trenches contained little or no loose, disturbed material. The footing forms were constructed of 2-by-8 inch planks, spaced about 20 inches apart. Four 1/2-inch diameter steel reinforcing bars were being prepared and placed along each of the footing -segments. The trench for the footings near the southeast corner of the basement area was northwest of the area where wet soils had been observed during my previous site visit. The soils exposed in the trench there and throughout the rest of the site were dry, except within the trench for the grade beam that crosses the center of the basement excavation, where the soils were locally wet. Probing there and elsewhere in the trenches indicated that the soils beneath the floor of the trenches were dense. :'} J This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: IL Get Engineers September 8, 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 p Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from August 31 through September 8, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036' Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. �onald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal 'F,+.i: 1. cv.. N'��: y; ♦ r •.;c _ max. :.Ur _��„J.£V s. - '9 X': '�� h`•.91:•� 4q-�..1��..1i-i 1% -c' o,zsy i:ti4.l �.��S�r 3 -'' [ ,,';` t.•. � � t r�' ec, •��h:,�tr�A ;.r��, �.�tye .�44�1�q`�,i;:=:��r s�.a�Kyr�; •.�..e ? �'� {tn��r�5" ���;,'�a, h ti.'}.,s3 ��,h�ru�°`iS 1tiL,,,t•��* 1y - i 7 '74�9 r.h, t h -�_' 'T�..� F1�_ �Y`I'- t:. �L 4.44Cf\ 3 �' y�F �'�' 4; •i� .?. S'.�`••`.. �.. !. .'_ R�Y' }: I �'....{.1 � � �. 51-L �3 c1"i E �'�` 7tj,..�(: {. :.. 4. .••4 . '. t, .w-.Z¢} .. e. 19 .e L. �- 1. ,, . i_'v .f.... Zw. ...l:.x -'.G, � '..,... i.. .{r, N ....c. .. .,. .-. .... 1. ..,-.: Z r_...�i} .. ..i-J. .. ��� Geo�rEngineers FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-Bo2 Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 9/8/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 8 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale, WA 1205 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe Footings Sunny and warm 1235 No foundation work was being performed within the site at the time of this site visit. Two men were splitting logs and loading them into a truck parked within the northeast corner of the property. On the adjacent (Perides) property to the south, a "Bobcat" front-end loader was removing rock from a rock pile along 75th Place West near the southeast corner of the Miller property, appparently for use in a rockery wall being constructed -between the Perides residence and the Miller property. The foundation footings have been poured and the forms have been stripped. The footings and the grade beam within the basement area have been poured "neat" (i.e. - without forms) within the trenches that I inspected during my previous site visit. The other footings for the house and garage had been poured within forms. No areas of wet soils were observed within the foundation areas for the basement or other portions of the house. Some seepage was observed emerging from the cut -slope adjacent to the northeast corner of the garage, where approximately one cubic yard of soil has sloughed into the excavation. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job.or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: I, G e o Qt 'Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: September 15, 1989 Consulting Geotechnicat Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from September 9 through September 14, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Seni2 Geologist on W. Koloski Principal �U Geo \r Engirwers 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Prepared By: - Donald W. Tubbs Purpose of Visit: Observe Foundation FIELD REP( IT Project: I Clyde Miller Residence Owner: Clyde A. Miller Location: Arrival: Meadowdale, WA 1745 Weather: Departure: Sunny and warm 1800 File Number: 1757-001-Bo2 Date: 9/14/89 Report Number: 9 Page: 1 of 1 Permit Number: No workers or equipment were the site at the time of this site visit. The steel reinforcing bars for the foundation have been mostly assembled, and forms have been assembled for the south foundation walls. No areas of wet soils were observed within the foundation areas for the basement or other portions of the house. Some seepage was observed emerging from the cut -slope adjacent to the northeast corner of the garage, and this water was reinfiltrating into the soil immediately north of the garage. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to Comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project Attachments: Distribution: Signed: 1 Geo aNOEngineers' September 22, 1989 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the 'period from September 15 through September 22, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 Yours very truly, GeoEnginee'rss ,, Inc. D ald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist /Jon W. Koloski Principal �. �)�• � rit.` �'. r�ti� 1 V ) �. f 1� t i 4 h ter 11 .�, �. 1'1 _ n, i �at � fa'7 3 -'hi ,�{s' 1 � _4 � Y fro IJ } 1 ,.•) Y , i. i' d.� 1`("S <. 9 \ k f C.`'�i ( 1 I f}t. • .K � l - -;�;;d �....... -. , . •4 � {..'iKra,�,, , . ,..•�•�... {k. •,�-��`! f„ ¢:,.` r•IaY..tipr t .`i' "*' "£ rz i i _�,�,�Si, This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: Geo p Engineers September 28, 1989 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/2.0/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from September 23 through September 28, 1989. DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller +ielr 20521 - 14th Avenue West o Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005, Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.('206) 746-5068 - Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Senior ologist J n W. Koloski Principal " File Number: Geo \r EngQineers FIELD REPORT 1 7 5 7 - 001- Bo 2 ��W L7 Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 9/28/89 Bellevue, WA 98WS Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 11 Prepared By: location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale, WA 0915 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe footing drains Overcast 1015 Gary Goodnight and four other men were working at the site. The footing drain pipe had been mostly installed and wrapped with filter fabric, and some backfill had been placed adjacent to the west wall of the basement area. The footing drain pipe consists of 4-inch diameter smooth wall pipe, with two rows of 1/2-inch perforations. The pipe is being placed such that the perforations are located 1/3 of the way up the pipe along the east wall of the foundation, and 2/3 of the way up the pipe along the north, south and west walls of the foundation. The pipe is being wrapped with a non -woven filter fabric. The backfill being placed adjacent the pipe (and which will also be used for the drainage zone adjacent to the subsurface walls) consists of medium to coarse sand. I estimated to percentage of fines within the sand to be approximately 2 percent. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: p. GeoEngineers October 6, 1989 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: BOIL 11to OCT 10 1989 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field.Report describing our observations during the period from September 29 through October 4, 1989. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. ' D W. Tubbs Senior Geologist n W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller a 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight. 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 Geo �`� �llEngineers FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-B02 Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 10/4/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Owner: Clyde A. Miller Report Number: 12 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Mead owdale, WA 1415 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe backfill Overcast 1430 The backfill has been placed adjacent to the exterior foundation walls and the same type of material (clean, coarse sand) has been stockpiled within the basement area for use beneath the floor slab. The area surrounding the house has been regraded in preparation for implementation of temporary erosion control measures, which will include surface water runoff control and mulching of bare soil areas. Discharge pipes from the foundation subdrain, and from the footing and roof drains, have been routed to the top of the slope near the northwest corner of the house. After returning to the office, I advised Gary Goodnight via telephone that temporary erosion control measures should be.completed as soon as possible, and that runoff and the water from the discharge pipes should be routed to the toe of the slope via an exposed tight line until the permanent surface drainage facilities are completed. 'Sv1100% otj1b15* This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: G e o Engineers 0 City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: 0 October 13, 1989 gutl.MNG O C T 16 1989.. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from October 5 through October 12, 1989. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Pax. (206)746-5068 File Number: GeA-401 FIELD REPORT 1757-001--Bo2 -Engineers Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 10/12/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 13 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale, WA 1820 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Observe erosion control Overcast 1845 The upper portion of the driveway area has been surfaced with crushed rock. No other temporary erosion control measures have been implemented since the time of the previous field report. No concentrated runoff, erosion or sedimentation appears to have occurred during the recent rains. However, the previously dry soils are now moist to wet, and are therefore more likely to generate runoff during future rains. Erosion protection should be provided to bare soil areas as soon as possible. BUILDING OCT 161989 This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not Include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: Geol&ngineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: October 23, 1989 tsvltDllfa OCT 25 1989 Consulting Geotechnical .Engineers and Geologists In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), we are enclosing a Field Report describing our observations during the period from October 13 through October 21, 1989. As discussed during our October 20 telephone conversation with Mr. Saterlie, no further geotechnical monitoring is anticipated at this project site until final earthwork and drainage measures are accomplished. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd Enclosure P cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 1� 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight- 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 F'l'No 1757-001-B02 Geoingineers, fnc. 2405 Moth Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax.(206) 746-5068 ��� Geo �� Engineers FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-B02 Project: Date: 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 10/21/89 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 746-5200 Owner: Clyde A. Miller Report Number: 14 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale, WA 1505 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Observe erosion control Weather: Light overcast Departure: 1530 Permit Number: No workmen were at the site at the time of this inspection. Crushed rock has been placed along most of the length of the driveway. The soils on the downslope side of the upper driveway segment have been compacted using a Dresser model TD-8G bulldozer, which is presently parked at the site. The steepest portion of that slope has been covered with wood chips approximately 0.5 to 1 inch across. A soil berm has been constructed along the top of the steep slope adjacent to the lower driveway segment, to prevent drainage across that slope. A thin layer of straw mulch has been spread across most of the bare soil areas south and west of the house, and on the slope adjacent to the north property line. A soil berm has also been constructed to deflect water away from the latter slope. The remaining areas of sloping bare soil should be protected from erosion. The water that presently emerges from the drains near the top of the slope should be conducted via a tight line to the bottom of that slope, along with any other surface water runoff that may occur within the site. We should be notified when final earthwork is completed and permanent drainage measures are installed, so that we can inspect the site and submit our final construction report. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specificatlons throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: Geo p Engineers City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: Y'AL.�iltll7 APR 10 1990 April 10, 1990 Final Construction Report Miller Residence 16300 Block, 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington File No. 1757-001-BO2 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists We have completed construction monitoring for the Clyde A. Miller residence, 16310 - 75th Place West, in the Meadowdale area of Edmonds. It is our opinion, based on our, observations during construction monitoring, that the Miller residence substantially complies with the recommendations in our geotechnical report titled "Report, Geotechnical Consultation, Residential Site, 16300 Bock, 75th Place West, Meadowdale, Edmonds, Washington" and dated September 20, 1988. We trust this letter meets your present reeds. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. r Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon W. Koloski Principal DWT:wd cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 File No. 1757-001-BO2 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 :t. ..f, s > -. 5 4 i p., y '`V• �' - .c-sJ'b.� �-„�', i L s 'Ki "S7 & t�v�7�3ti s t� 1t c t 4v* Jf �7 s r �� ) 141 - �`.:L J\�..�. 'F A a,�. .(,�' Iw.f �•n.Je- t ``3 .., _ ,. s r,.. r. ..•s .,�w.., x. _.1' .. .x 3+.-, .a.5,.,t,. :. ,.,.,�.�. ..._a:.-.t •:a-.. s. ti•, ��=� Geo� Engineers April 10, 1990 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists City of Edmonds 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Mr. Jerry Saterlie Building Official Gentlemen: In accordance with the geotechnical monitoring requirements described in Section lla of the Meadowdale Permit Submittal Requirements (5/20/88), and our previous letter of October 23, 1989, we are enclosing our final Field Report describing our observations on April 9, 1990. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. vG� Donald W. Tubbs Senior Geologist Jon Principal DWT:wd Enclosure cc: Mr. Clyde A. Miller 20521 - 14th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Mr. Gary Goodnight 430 - 91st Avenue NE, A-2 Everett, Washington 98205 File No. 1757-001-B02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746-5200 Fax. (206) 746-5068 �•.�.� -.1 - .ir !`�: i. �r �_'' h,. Lt.� i" `.r�y. `o: u-•'•G'.�,,, '�-'_':�i","�i'`.:,;.SP:.=t"�2`:iT-�+:�'yf'•>;'; ""Y'j :'C.. l�ik� � .., t: '�t�. y. y ' E+t ! �'` .i`. �r tiT 1, c �i}.a "tom '� ,� -yr°x : a..S tnti,�::L.t�-�i{��p i L "%.jt:':-4,"t yb s�r7'+� S41 ��•$•+- 1 ��� F °c, .�tih _V ��34' Ll� r ii 1, r }(5.3i�•- :.; s �`" GeoEngineers FIELD REPORT File Number: 1757-001-Bo2 Project: Date: \® 2405 - 140thAvenue NE Clyde Miller Residence 4/9/90 Bellevue, WA 98005 Owner: Report Number: (206) 746-5200 Clyde A. Miller 15 Prepared By: Location: Arrival: Page: Donald W. Tubbs Meadowdale 19:05 1 of 1 Purpose of Visit: Weather: Departure: Permit Number: Final site inspection Light overcast 20:05 Clyde Miller and Gary Goodnight were at the house when I arrived. Construction and final grading appears to be complete, and final landscaping has begun with the planting. of shrubs. Clyde indicated that he will be importing some topsoil (no more than 6 inches) and will seed and plant the ground cover. Permanent surface drainage has been installed. Downspout drains and driveway drains join at a cleanout box near the top of the slope, :and descend diagonally across the slope as a single tight line to the base of the railroad bulhead. The discharged water then flows northward to the existing culvert beneath the railroad tracks. Clyde and Gary indicated that an engineer for the railroad specified the location for the tight line to descend the bulkhead. Construction of the drain line between the cleanout box and the bulkhead required minor cut and fill across the slope, and 2 to 3 cubic yards of fill material is present downslope from the cleanout box. Gary indicated that the drain line is entirely.within native soils. I recommended to Clyde that he periodically observe the amount of water entering and exiting the tight 'line to assure that no leakage is occurring within the area of the slope, and that repairs be made promptly if they are needed. A small portion of the driveway appears to drain onto an area to be planted with ground cover, rather than draining into the surface water collection system. I recommended to Clyde that, if sufficient runoff occurs to cause overland flow for more than a few feet beyond the driveway, an asphalt berm be installed to direct the water to the adjacent catch basin. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observations of activities relating to geotechnical engineering. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Our firm will not be responsible for job or site safety on this project. Attachments: Distribution: Signed: UTILITY EASEMENT IN CONSIDERATION of benefits to accrue to the grantors, herein, the undersigned, Buddy J. Leufkens and Jo Ann I. Leufken:_ _, hereby grant to the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Municipal Corporation, a perma- nent easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of a sanitary sewer over, across, through, and below the follow:inc:j described property; and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth and other obstructions interfering with the location, const.ructinn and maintenance of said utility or utilities, together with tJ)e r•i(jhi: of access to the easement at any time for the stated purl ,)SUI5. The easement and right-of-way hereby yrant4•,f is l-�(:4.;[ I'd 1.11 Lhe County of Snohomish, State of Washington, and is more par.ticulariy de- scribed as follows: A ten foot strip of land that is 5.00 feet on each >ide ot:, the sanitary sewer as it now exists or as located in t.t-ie future. Within the following dE?scr.ibed property: Lots 5, 6 and the North 20 feet of Lot 7, Block 60, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof record(-d in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington; TOGETHER with vacated Seaside Avenue adjacent thereto. TOGETHER WITH a temporary 10 foot construction easertien t over the aforementioned property. Said construction ease- ment will end upon completion of: the construction of the sanitary sewer, or January 1, 1985, whichever come:, first. THE CITY agrees to restore to substantially the original con- dition such improvements as are disturbed during the construction, maintenance and repair of said utility or utilities; provided the grantors, their heirs, or assigns shall. not construct any 17-lermanent. structure over, upon, or within the permanent easement. ..DATED this 3 day of 0 LJ 6+ 7:t .. cn n. STATO�OF�-WAgINGTON) a�� ) ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) Husband 4 f e ` `! _ ---- On this day peVsonally appeared before me and (�K t7,\ - ;Z_Jj _, 2 to me known to be the individual. (s) de scribdd in and who executed the within and foregoing iris tr..ument, and acknowledged that �"_ signed the same as {,n;..,'..z. free and voluntary act acid deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. UNDER MY 19g_3 HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THIS 7,�d. DAY OF �• ' 0 ;, p �(� NOTARY PUBLIC in and fo.r i;lrE' st,:1te of Washington residing t, a"Wlioir wi4Stftlt4P3E11 •ir"s'UF�t31LisxYlwtiy:4lz•�q:9i46Yriilea�:•x...'kitxn�l,�1e,C•f>rdf�:a•Fsitt�i;. - _ L _ �....�.....-_.__........ ..... .. _ e•�!.F�t.FA�KT.4yi,.F�.'.i�`�..'�' � x .+t{.ti.f .T�.�•^ity,i _•_• - p[� [ (� (� [� REVENUE STAMPS 1HIS SPACE RESERVED Fa &E.GIQP.Q(�2►5\1� :[_ CITY CLERK ^ L'a� ®Lf Pioneer National Title Insurance Company crvlc CENTER WASHINGTON TITLE DIVISION iled for Record at Request of EDMONDS, WA 98020 ro EA M 8,914AY 1:0 1 A;M DEAN V. WILLIAMS. A01 U SN0N0MISH COUN rY. WA. li. FORM "a R v0 Quit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR 4_1 j for and in consideration of convey and quit claim to (/ T'y 'a O /I.' 0 j ,ft)Ni cL L . M /4 /- f� the following described real estate, situated in the County of 5-N,1 H o /h / S/`/ State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire The Easterly 10.00 feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 60, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to.the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38,.Records of Snohomish County, Washington, as measured perpendicular to the East line thereof. NO EXCISE. A)G REQUIRED [Pi:�;r1_09 I iy"At, Smhomis i Cuuuti Tru�surur. Uepu-ty together with the right to make all necessary cut or fill—slbpes on the land of grantor's adjacent to the above -described real property in connection with the constructiori maintenance or improvement of the above -described real property for purposes of a public roadway. Dated this day of s XAL .............t�zA�� . STATE OF WASHINGTON, `l County of0�o!/Y) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be �the individual described In and who 'executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that '�j signed the same as 3�'- free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my band an o� $e�e1,t1LilF� /��day of R 1= C: i ; I it E D TAP)! � ........ r �cl1?-� ..... .................. ............ Lary Public in and for the State o �gs �ax, MAR 1 0 R C`fi N, -lusoo ,. residing at V 0 �„ /.r PAGE 0 6 r 5 0 � 9 0 5 10 00� PERMIT COUNTER Fof W,,,S`,���zr� > = c Pioneer National Title Insurance Company WASHINGTON TITLE DIVISION iled for Record at Request of IIN REVENUE STAM➢s FORM Las R Quit Claim Deed THE GRANTOR e / y� t %�? /L, L L-� T tl /� c L , / < 4 4 IQ J for and in consideration of W - 0— convey and quit claim to �'y o f �/> �? D /V D S the following described real estate, situated in the County of 5-y0 N o /h / SH State of Washington including any interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: The Easterly 10.00 feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 60, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, as measured perpendicular to the East line thereof. together with the right to make all necessary cut or fill —slopes on the land -of grantor's adjacent to the above -described real property in connection with the construction, maintenance or improvement of the above -described real property for purposes of a public roadway. Dated this day of /7 .... ..... (SXAL) STATE OF WASHINGTON C-' , County of �'UOhol/YJ _ On this day personally appeared before me '//ek q ��rv�`c� /YI / �/t, to me known to be �ythe Individual described In and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that '�signed the same as free and voluntaryact and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. q Klr, GIVEN under my band an o�%i� E �day of m_ RECk;IVED AP, y `� ... -......... y-............ ............................ tar Public i>~ ar�d for 'tic -state of Washi>.ato+r, MAR 10 C'1I L'o PU B or-, residixj at y�F 9.rs eN PERMIT COUNTER OF WAS Suhmit to Couxty Treasurer of the This form is your receipt when stamped countylnwhichpropertylsloceted. AL ESTATE EXCISE TAX by cashier. Pay by cash or certified check to County Treasurer. CHAPTER 82.45 RCW PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CHAPTER 458-61 WAC THIA AFFIBAVIT WIII Nr)T RF ACCFPTFn [IN[ FAR ITFUA l TJ THRAIIC.H l/J ARE FIILLV COYPLFTFn O Name Clyde A. Miller and O Name City of Edmonds o° Janice L. P�iller W� J= Q �Q m Street 16320 75th P1. W. " Street 250 5th Ave. N. City Edmonds State WA zip 98020 City Edmonds State WA zip 98020 NEW OWNER'S Name City of Edmonds ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBERS PERMANENT ADDRESS 250 5th Ave. N. 5131-060-005-0000 FOR ALL PROPERTY Street TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE City/State Edmonds, WA Zip 98020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY ® OR IN CITY OF Edmonds The Easterly 10.00 feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 60, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, as measured perpendicular to the East line thereof. Is this property currently: YES NO Classified or designated as forest land? ❑ Chapter 84.33 RCW Classified as current use land (open space, farm and agricultural, or timber)? Chapter 84.34 RCW ❑ IKI Exempt from property tax under nonprofit ❑ organizations Chapter 84.36 RCW? Receiving special valuation as historic Elproperty under Chapter 84.26 RCW? FLI Type Property: ® land only ❑ land with new building. ❑ land with previously ❑ land with mobile home used building SEE TAX OBLIGATIONS ON, REVERSE SIDE (1) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE (RCW) 84.33 or RCW 84.34) If the new owner(s) of land that is classified or designated as current use or forest land wish(es) to continue the classification or designation of such land, the new owner(s) must sign below. If the new owner(s) do(es) not desire to continue such classification or designation, all compensating or additional tax calculated pursuant to RCW 84.33.120 and 140 or RCW 84.34.108 shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. The county assessor must determine if the land transferred qualifies to continue classification or designation and must so Indicate below. Signatures do not necessarily mean the land will remain In classification or designation. If it no longer qualifies, it will be removed and the compensating taxes will be applied. All new owners must sign. This land ❑ does ❑ does not quality for continuance. DEPUTY ASSESSOR DATE (3) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (Chapter 84.26 RCW) If the new owner(s) of property with special valuation as historic property wish(a) to continue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below. If the new owner(s) do(es) not desire to continue such special valuation, all addi- tional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW, shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. (3) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE 0° The following optional questions are requested by RCW 82.45.120 Is property at the time of sale: YES NO a. Subject to elderly, disability, or physical improvement 1 ❑ 2 ❑ exemption? b. Does building, If any, have a heat pump or solar heating or cooling system? c. Does this conveyance divide a current parcel of land? d. Does sale include current crop or merchantable timber? 1❑ 2❑ 1❑ 2❑ 1❑ 2❑ 60 Description of personal property if included in sale (furniture, ap- pliances;etc.) land only for street purposes If exemption claimed, explain Type of Document _Quit Claim Deed Date of Sale or Conveyance Instrument Jan i i a ry 10, 1989 Gross Sale Price 1 / $ Personal Property (deduct) 2/ $ Taxable Sale Price $ Excise Tax State 3/ $ Local4/ $ Delinquent Penalty 5/ $ Total Tax Due $ (SEE 1-5 ON REVERSE SIDE) AFFIDAVIT I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT (see #6 on reverse for penalties). SIGNATURE M -Q�`Q�'�1 NAME (print) Diane M. Cunningham DATE & PLACE OF SIGNING: 3/23/89, Edmonds, WA SPECIFY (circle): grantor/grantee/grantor's agent grantee's agent Address of residence or place of business of person signing (specify): 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 Telephone Number_ 771-3202 e. Does conveyance involve a trade, partial YES NO interest corporate affiliates, related parties, 1 ❑ 2 Eltrust, receivership or an estate? I. Is the grantee acting as a nominee for a third 1 ❑ 2 ❑ party? g. Principal use: 1 ❑ agricultural 2 ❑ condominium 3 ❑ recreational 4 ❑ apt (4+ units) 5 ❑ industrial 6 ❑ residential 7 ❑ commercial 8 ❑ mobile home 9 ❑ timber FOR TREASURER'S USE ONLY FORM REV 64 0030 3m (9/87) .1156- r^r111fJTV TDCACIIDCD Sutt.nit to County Treasurer of the This form is your receipt when stamped county In which property is located. OAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX �by cashier. Pay by cash or certified CHAPTER 82.45 RCW check to County Treasurer. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CHAPTER 468.61 WACC� //�� THIS AFFIDAVIT WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ITEMS In THROUGH nT ARE FULLY COMPLETED O Name Clyde A. Miller Name City of Edmonds OJ= >.< W Q M" m" Street 16320 75th P1. W. street 250 5th Ave. N. City Edmonds State WA zip 98020 City Edmonds state WA zip 98020 Name City of Edmonds ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBERS NEW OWNER'S 250 5th Ave. N. PERMANENT ADDRESS 5131-060-005-0000 FOR ALL PROPERTY Street TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE City/State Edmonds, WA Zip 98020 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY ® OR IN CITY OF Edmond The Easterly 10.00 feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 60, Plat of Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington, as measured perpendicular to the East line thereof. 0 Is this property currently: YES Classified or designated as forest land? ❑ Chapter 84.33 RCW Classified as current use land (open space, farm and agricultural, or timber)? Chapter 84.34 RCW ❑ I W Exempt from property tax under nonprofit ❑ organizations Chapter 84.36 RCWT KI Receiving special valuation as historic Elproperty under Chapter 84.26 RCW? Type Property: ® land only ❑ land with new building. ❑ land with previously ❑ land with mobile home used building SEE TAX OBLIGATIONS ON REVERSE SIDE O' (1) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE (RCW) 84.33 or RCW 84.34) If the new owner(s) of land that is classified or designated as current use or forest land wish(es) to continue the classification or designation of such land, the new owner(s) must sign below. If the new owner(s) do(es) not desire to continue such classification or designation, all compensating or additional tax calculated pursuant to RCW 84.33.120 and 140 or RCW 84.34.108 shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. The county assessor must determine if the land transferred qualifies to continue classification or designation and must so indicate below. Signatures do not necessarily mean the land will remain in classification or designation. If it no longer qualifies, it will be removed and the compensating taxes will be applied. All new owners must sign. This land ❑ does ❑ does not qualify for continuance. DEPUTY ASSESSOR DATE (3) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (Chapter 84.26 RCW) If the new owner(s) of property with special valuation as historic property wish(s) to continue this special valuation the new owner(s) must sign below. If the new owner(s) do(es) not desire to continue such special valuation, all addi- tional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW, shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale. (3) OWNER(S) SIGNATURE The following optional questions are requested by RCW 82.45.120 Is property at the time of sale: YES a. Subject to elderly, disability, or physical improvement Elexemption? 1 b. Does building, if any, have a heat pump or solar El or cooling system? 1 c. Does this conveyance divide a current parcel of land? 1 ❑ d. Does sale include current crop or merchantable 1 ❑ timber? © Description of personal property if included in sale (furniture, ap- pliances, etc.) land only for street purposes If exemption claimed, explain Type of Document Quit Claim DP_ed Date of Sale or Conveyance Instrument January 10, 1989 Gross Sale Price 1 / $ Personal Property (deduct) 2/ $ Taxable Sale Price $ Excise Tax State 3/ $ Local4/ $ Delinquent Penalty 5 / $ Total Tax Due $ (SEE 1-5 ON REVERSE SIDE) Mu AFFIDAVIT I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT ((sse'en,#6 on reversse' ,for penalties). SIGNATURE M • NAME (print) Diane M. Cunningham DATE 8 PLACE OF SIGNING: 3/23/89, Edmonds, WA SPECIFY (circle): grantor/grantee/grantor's agent grantee's agent Address of residence or place of business of person signing (specify): 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 Telephone Number 771-3202 NO ❑ e. Does conveyance Involve a trade, partial interest corporate affiliates, related parties, trust, receivership or an estate? YES NO. 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 2 I. Is the grantee acting as a nominee for a third 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 2 ❑ party? g. Principal use: 2 ❑ 1 ❑ agricultural 2 ❑ condominium 3 ❑ recreational 2 ❑ 4 ❑ apt (4+ units) 5 ❑ industrial 6 ❑ residential 7 ❑ commercial 8 ❑ mobile home 9 ❑ timber FOR TREASURER'S USE ONLY FORM REV 64 0030 3m (9/67) -1155- a SW 1/4, 5W 1/4 , SEC, 5 , 'TWP 27 M., RGE. 4 E,, W.M. SCAL E : V = 20' DATUM, GW OF EDMONDS SAN•SEWE-R MA NVERT 75.M. EkINVERT OF SAN.SEWER M.N. SOUTH OF PROPERLY AT TOE OF HILL- 7G-' AVE-.W. TNV. EL. '7.9 ( PER CITY R-ANS) ,PiG,�oc �r r.• A..0 In m 1 k O PROPER7V L/NE N 870 35' 4Z (P / 1 [ U) r � v / ' n Q. e ' (� t r r r' • t`1 r F IC � i REV. Baey 45 5V+,:%vt/ + .DT 1012e/&9 vz)46;1�,v FtiRM1t ���NTEft El S�s a. Qjy4L LANOSO /o-Z8.13 JOB No. 88-4043 Sheet 1 of 1' T-7-F 571" ALL i5ic - 7q-y-3o I SW 114j sW 114, .5E'C. 5; TWP 27 Al, RGE. 4E., W.M. 55 40 35 30 _2-5 20 �RMA 8E, AC �+� SEy; T t SW iiS�N 9TSW Q N . �f,'•� NORM EACt1 Y Alt t _^ t.i g�UJ FSe / IyY h t„ t51 PL SW S aT CIA >t p w 3 P 1 r�.eTsT TH N tSJ CA ..r� STjS- s 1/8i e158TH t+ X '3a W _ 152ND ST ems' d SW �'Pi AN; ~ N M N '' c 3.},.'.,.'•';,. 31 I N $ RD ST 1s3dD Tl sw� , s T T� .y 1�• ? a '. 1 70P L G t T;T N S i hf dtSOIYUAbF^t; . 167TH SWuwlFOilM7Y.f.: y+ 1 T w el H IL J a s It TH it t.x f,%,' 4 � ,i. r/ is4ra1� ,t aw 3:184TH I ST V1 SCALE /"=ZO' J W DATUM C/TY 0FEDMOND5 SA IV. SEWER M.H. INVERT l D11 AL T.B. EX. /NV. OF SAN. SEWF_R M.H. SdUTH OF M EXISTING HDUSE \`�AD� �� l '� M. PROPERTY AT TOE Oc N/ZL- 7h'1'h AVE. W. ` v �� / t �o p<� v / 1 : °� ° 1 r �7 EX. C46 TVP45 2T a � 1o1H T +� _ i t STSW � 1 �,. r Z (9 7 O INV. EL. 7B. 9 (F'E/? C/TY PLANS) � EX 15TlNG � / / � TOP 80.54 W R/M GRATE �" � � > /TxNo sT w }� d f72 � � � 4 bh CF\OUNDATION /y/�� EXIST. / / /E 74. 92 /2 " CP N, �p K a r 4� i lv c i '—� iSNEb / / /, 1 St w a4 aso »no �y �r+� W p �/p" 17_ T)i.S� � 74 N ,rr� 'ass W - / / H ST S W �' R / f = W SECTI01V A -A SCALE / " = 30' HORIZ. I" = 5' VE'RT. 5 24 -21 M is 70 22 60 EX. 55 MH TOP 82. SS /E 73.73 /N, 5 0 6 IE 73.70 OUT, N ss �s D. E'X. ce TYPE II 48" 0 TOP Be. 10 /E 7/0.95 /2 "E, /B "N EX. CB TOP 80.59 IE 7B.29--/2" S,�MEW. 4t N. EXI57: CB TD BE S'UUKC& UNKNOWN REMOVED 4 RE1'LACEp NO ACT/V/TY EV/DENT /A//TVO-= 7' / Q /A/--1A/ 1 ON EXIST. /Z" TD THE WEST. DRIVEWAY PROFILE G 1"=20'HOR. t^- ="Jcn ecG--0 (EYft'T. g-t0% --• 7F uOUE: COMRACTOR 70 5TAKE 0 VERI DRIVEW&Y SLOPES eELEVAMC l FRoFUSED GRNDE / 2" CLA55" 6" A5{'H. OVER, G" OF COMMCTED 5A,5E Coin WEK RFZE5Rl1ZWC1H -THOSE G 95 % N[�1C. D2Y DE1�151T( Ct�dPA OU IRESE PLAL15 91 EKIGtF.IE�Z tK1EE E . 70 �EJv5TIMG GRoUgo f�5 60 0 5E 0+50 I+1 1+00 1+50 ��N v�z,l/EwAY c� 12"MIN. COVER B V'PVC TO BE STRAPPED 70 .PAIL ROAD 7755. 1 STING) .r EXIST. /8 "Co 8 W� Z� 40 // --"A�"—EX16-T. GROUND COMPACTED NATIVE BEDDING DETA IL N.T.S. r ND >' 1 4 r �w q t N4�Isx.TS , 3.: 178TH I I ST SW e VICINITY MAP N.T.S. z 1. All work and materials shall be in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and specifications and Washington State Department of Transportation 1988 Standard Specifications .for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 2. All work within the site and County right-of-way shall be subject to the inspection of the County engineer, or his designated representative. 3. Prior to any site work pertaining to drainage, the contractor shall contact the chief inspector for land development division at (206) 771-3202 to schedule a preconstruction conference. Due to field changes (revisions), engineered as-builts shall be required prior to site approval. 4. Locations of existing utilities are approximate. The Contractor shall be responsible for verifying the location of existing utilities prior to construction. Utilities shown here are for the purpose of assisting the Contractor in locating said utilities. Contractor shall contact Underground Utilities Location Center (1- 800-424-5555) 48 hours prior to beginning of construction and obtain on -site utilities locations. 5 -ALl -e sit- preparation and earthwork shall be in accordance with the geotechnical report prepared by Geoengineers dated September 20, 1988. 6. A formal permit shall be issued by.Burlington Northern Railroad prior to work within railroad R/W. MAR 2, "1 EARTRWORK O'CIANITIES CUBIC YARDS EXC4114710N..... 340 -c,E' C T/ pAI 8_3 CUBIC YARDS FILL ............. 300 MAR,) , h-, OWNER; CLYDR M/Z.I-ER 20521 /4 f<7 AUB. W I �l LYAINWOOD, WA 949036 R,41 ,No. 4206)-672-7638 o u� W M z y, QD z N s ar ar y = z z 4 to w � h C o G ON z W W � � w v o u ". W 00 a N N z i— C�3 z Q r W, 9 co co 0 Z 0 , MAR 2 4 1989 � SHEET NO.: 1 Of JOB NO., 88-4649 )N- SW //4, SW //4, SEG- S, TWP. 27 Al, RGE. 4E., W. M. 55 ;� 45 35 9 25 20 SCALE /"=20' DATUM CITY OFEDMONDS SAN. SEWER M.H. INVERT T.B.M., EX. INV. OF5AN. SEWER M.H. SOUTH OF t PROPERTY AT TOE OF H/ZL- 7671h AVE. W. INV EL. 78.9 (-PeR C/TY PLANS) 1 1 PROPOSED 6R061AUD / (o / I � EXIST. GROUND / 2'COVER (� RAIL ROAD TRACK (EX/ST.) (40 G"PVC BEGINS AT POINT Tho,fr " ADS DA&1611TS / g sAN. SWR.(DEPTH I\Pp2ox� BETA/ I G WALL (EXIST. DETAIL AT RIGHT / /. r✓ /. ter- I /1 A I A A SCALE I'= 30' IVRIZ. I" = 5' VERT. IE 49.0 CITY Of EDMONDS BLDG. DEFT. CONDITIONAL PERMIT WORK- 00W-1/0 ADDRESS /13/D F_-5'1xZ h/ OWNER" /f�/LLEIZ. APPROVED DATE - BY BLDG. OFFICIAL KEEP THESE STAMPED PLANS ON JOSSITE FOR ALL INSPEG" T iONS PERMIT NO. I SHEET OF / Ex. 55 MN TOP B2. S5 /E 73.73 /N, S ¢ E 1E 73.70 OUT, A/ S S SS EX. ce TYPE 2T 48" 0 TOP ea.10 /E 7&.95 /2"E,/6"N EXIST. 12" TO TL1E N.E TO BE ABANDONED Ex. CB TOP 80.59 /E 7B.217-/2" S,,Al. E., W, 4 N. EXIST. /2" TO REMA/, S URCE 11/VKN0WA1— EXIST. C8 TO BE NO ACT/V/TY EV/DENT REM0VED REPLACED /A1ITV/7F T / I2 /A/LtAlI NOTES 1. All work and materials shall be in accordance with City of Edmonds standards and specifications and Washington State Department of Transportation 1988 Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. .. GI 2. All work within the site and right-of-way shall be subject to the inspection of the C� engineer or his designated representative. «-Y 3. Prior to any site work pertaining to drainage, the contractor shall contact the chief inspector for land development division at (206) 771-3202 to schedule a preconstruction conference. Due to field changes (revisions), engineered as-builts shall be required prior to site approval, 4. Locations of existing utilities are approximate. The Contractor shall be responsible for verifying the location of existing utilities prior to construction. Utilities shown here are for the purpose of assisting the Contractor in locating said utilities. Contractor shall contact Underground Utilities Location Center (1- 800-424-5555) 48 hours prior to beginning of construction and obtain on -site utilities locations. 5. All site preparation and earthwork shall be in accordance with the geotechnical report prepared by Geoengineers dated September 20, 1988. 6. A formal permit shall be issued by Burlington Northern Railroad prior to work within railroad R1W. S5 SF>P.cr=T/ r � RMA 8F�A ; �ST SW NORM EACH > \d 1� yQ,. IL S H8TH 149TH N (3- r IJ �CID V- I►,rFISHERI>IR >i `' 1 ; rL{ SW ST ap 0 <' TH I <� iW �` KSW'-"'-- 7 tSiSTPr _ \`� 1Wr �1. 150TH P 3 # W `� 1 i Sojs 15zND ST >s. o sw3 ; t;� Q N N N 3 tTRD ST a t. ,•{,l? ,"'• iiUN`o h:,� >': I,,,•��::• Q 153d0 PL SIN V1 L Olt 'r sr r` " I'" ? h� < 3 Q i L1 ® 1 t157TH S �Y . � r 157TH ST J C .,� ��/ ; sV z?>i; BARK..,:,::. nserr 31» PLI Z J " 1 ,� a l H PL f I <' & aw3 $I t o a 0 o J LPL 60TH16F- »g{rn 4' 3 ;F9 R11 it11 TH�P j� Sw; oy * R �D I �y'e1a� r w I a au ISI ffl ttf J� W ° aa9��I Sty f� ID M X/ -- � I > 11 184,jH3154TH I ST �°> I L O W 0WH- E PL PIV THIS SIT EI t�': " o Q o I1MH T H• k } z Q 0 > r STSw t;t� ST SW Fl I sz 7 .,. Vr �- Q V t d 172N0 5 '� ° 4 ]R < cep e,, AD �C,y 1�+0 `5T w '' T ., 9 ' > b 1,O IT—g �.S P 5 174 {4 W LL 0 J 5 H• � T 1 T T I +� t> 74S H W UJ �j 3 '>W , , I < I > q vT :. :,yS0LIN4 I Za-W, .¢ 3177TTH•I 1T0 H PL SW Q1/T ;S TH VICINITY MAP N.T.S. Z I^ rul H SS , ,,,, y a T g t 0 1P SO I� / (SASEMEHT- 45 0 CAP ABANDON EXIST IP, 4s / q' W SrORIVI DRA/A/ TO THE WE5T• S eCTI O N I SECTIOrI CZ z f / o DRIVEWAY PROM LE 1 20'HoR. g-io% ALE' 1"= 5'VER. �"„ z° a .. - oo 1 - �0 3 T5 ---- - - -- / b '� 2 m PA2t_ING y1 C o W '® W / / O 6I MOTE CONTRACTOR -TD STAKE 0 VERI �� 2" CLASS" 6" ASPH. OVER G" OF $ DRIVEWAY aZFES 4•ELEVA-RCM / COMMCTEO 645E COURSE OVER g , TO 95 % NAX. ORL( DEA151W ('QA (PA >; > 0 OQ -THESE PL6KI5 / EtiIGI�lEE2-�� ?O �v '; " N I N y — -- Ek15T11.1G GROutap � 45 AS�MEIaT -- _ 3 / SECTI0H 3 / .� I 60 - / 60 ( / Z 0 /I z 55 0 0+50 *1 1+00 1+50 1 sr Loon 6,ARA.G-,E �.e�1N �venrAY � Cf2Pa/L `� SEC not -A � SPacc / Z v G„ ADS �'--EX 1ST. GROUND / UJ to PVC / /Z"MIN. COVER ME ROUND I211CMP EL80W \�am 4 / OR EQUAL - SHIELD- // ATTACHED TO TOP O� WALL GALVANIZED STEEL STRAP W1112" �V B LAG BOLTS INTO EXISTING 'TIMBER. I'MIN. 3 PLACES) �. -� 6"?UC TO BE STRAPPED COMPACTED NATIVE BEDDING -- EXISTING R.R. TRACK RETAINING Ca TOA'A/l ROAD T/E5. TNG) I WALL SUPPORTS ¢ ' 0, C. �` (EX/SI -- 6 PUG 0 i- !o "TEE OUTFAL L - I -- — 077R4PPE0 TO WALL. z z W/RIPPA'o OUTFAL L \ BOTH SIDES -- I EX/STING GRADE AGAINST WALL O \ 4'= 6;" QUARRY SPAL L I I I V 8 RIPRAP OUTFAL. L I I I TO BOTTOM OF DITCH, l2" DEEP Ali I EARTHWORK OIJANIT/E5 CUBIC YARDS EXC411.47/ON....... 30 crs RF-CI4DETA IL 1VED SECT/ON B-B CUBIC YARDS FILL 120 c6 0 /V. T. S. N.T.S. ol 16 1136y Z MAY 16 1339 � OWNER; SHEET NO.: 'I Of 2 PERMIT COUNTER CLYDE MILLER 20501 /4 fh AI/E. W. LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 PA/ No. (206)-672-76-55 JOB NO., 8 8- 4 5 4 9 C SW //¢, SW 1/4, SEC. 53 TWP 27 Al., RGE. 4E.0 LA M EROSION CONTROL & GRADING NOTES SCALE >"= 20' DATUM C/rY OF E,0MO/VOS SAN. SEWER M.11 INVERT 7/g /v/, : EX. /NV. O c SAA/. 6ff WeR MN SOUTH pF rn ,'R0PER7-Y AT TOE O.0 AIIZ [ - 7eo7h 441,5 W /NU EL . 79 9 (AFR C/TY R4Al5) 1 S/LTFEAJCE - AT TOP OF BANK SEE .DETAIL; Al / h O o4P �J�v C"�R4/GR04D TIE �RETA/.V/.VG WA6e- �� r '10 n`'� I TEMPORARY SWALE PRIOR TO CAPPING l l 121, STORM P/PE. l l CHECK DAM 50 ' O. C . (oy l � SEE DETAIL / / l / moo. / LP /ZER O 7 EX, 61W1� E PRIOR Te APP/NG /2" .$STORM P/PE / r / / A / i / FILTER FABRIC W/ WIRE MESH 2x4 DOUGLAS FIR No I GRADE OR EQUAL 3/4" MIN DIA WASHED ALT-STL FENCE POST GRAVEL EA SIDE I� VOP OF BANK N II i SECT IDN FILTER FABRIC-MIRAFI 140N OR EQUAL ATTACH W/ STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS __Tn n 2"x2r'x14GA WIRE / MESH OR EQUAL n / n N II �I II II II _ II II II II II II II II � II V II N I�I � I � 4'0C TYP BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN 8"x12" TRENCH FILTER FENCE DETAIL NO SCALE 1. Approval of this temporary sedimentation control plan does not constitute an approval of design, size, nor a location of pipes, restrictors, channels, or retention o facilities, but is an approval of the temporary erosion sedimentation control plan only. The siltation control systems depicted on this drawing are such as to meet minimum County requirements. As construction progresses and expected. (seasonal) conditions dictate, more siltation control facilities may be required to insure complete siltation control on the proposed plat. Therefore, during the course of construction it shall be the obligation and responsibility of the developer to address any new conditions that may be created by his activities and to provide additional facilities over and above minimum requirements, as may be needed to protect adjacent properties. 2. Provide and maintain temporary sedimentation collection facilities to insure sediment laden water does not Z enter the natural drainage system. These facilities o must be in operation prior to clearing and building construction, and satisfactorily maintained until w construction and landscaping are completed and cc potential for on -site erosion has passed. 3. Temporary erosion sedimentation control facilities shall be constructed by placing siltation control filters around swales (natural or manmade) and shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition until such time that land clearing and/or construction of permanent Z Z drainage facilities are completed, operational, and then returned to original ground conditions. Temporary siltation control filters shall be approved filter fabrics 2' tall. 4. Berms and swales shall be constructed as necessary to direct all sediment laden water to natural vegetation for silt control. Discharge from cutoff swales shall be directed to disperse into native vegetation on -site. 5. Vegetation shall be established on areas disturbed or on areas of construction as necessary to minimize erosion. Areas to be rough graded with finished grading to follow near project completion are to be seeded with Annual, Perennial or Hybrid Rye Grass. This also includes perimeter dikes and the sediment basin embankment. Hydroseed preferred. 6. Stockpiles are to be located in safe areas and �••, d' • adequately protected by temporary seeding and mulching..,��•':.�►��i•�e Hydroseed preferred.;',�r` py t Q 7. Immediately following finish grading, permanent 0 11 ;�,; ^ vegetation (consisting of rapid, persistent and legume) p 1j•. �. �vr will be applied (min. 80 lb/ac) . This is to include: 20 % Annual, Perennial or Hybrid Rye Grass p1�'� jjr�••• Y 40% Creeping Red Fescue °��• ��` 40 % White Clover Hydroseed preferred. AGGREGATE: Ballast (WASH DOT stnd. spec. INSTALLATION: The area of the' entrance 9-03.9 (1) . should be cleared of all vegetation, roots 8. Preparation of Surface: All areas to be seeded shall be and other objectionable material. The gravel cultivated to the satisfaction Of the engineer. This shall be placed to the specified dimensions. g ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS: The aggregate layer Any drainage facilities required because of may be accomplished by dlscing, raking, harrowing or �•r must be at least 6 inches thick. It must washing should be constructed according to other acceptable means. tit) extend the full width of the vehicular specifications in the plan. If wash racks s lied l Sh Fertilizer: al be a W ingress and egress area. The length of the are used, they should be installed according Fepig at 400' rr per acre r e Of 1 O - � entrance must be at least 50 feet. to manufacturer's specifications. 20-20 (10 pounds per 1100 square feet) or equivalent. t- z MAINTENANCE: The entrance shall be a m WASHING: If conditions on the site are such maintained in a condition which will prevent p that most of the mud is not removed from tracking or flow of mud onto public rights- vehicle tires by contact with the gravel, of -way. This may require periodic top 0 then the tires must be washed before vehicles dressing with 2-inch stone, as conditions oe enter a public road. Wash water must be demand, and repair and/or cleanout of any y 2 Q carried away from the entrance to a settling structures used to trap sediment. All area to remove sediment. A wash rack may materials spilled, dropped, washed or tracked i 3 also be used to make washing more convenient from vehicles onto roadway or into storm � 0p � — — -- - and effective. drains must be removed immediately: -� y � — - — - - - --- - -- - - -- - - 00 L - _ ADDITIONAL NOTES o CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL 1. All excavation and grading shall comply with Chapter 70 of NO SCALE the Uniform Building Code, 1985 edition. y W c' z m Z. The Applicant shall submit a truck route plan to the City O 3 m Engineer for approval prior to removal of any excavated material. h W 3' 3' a o s 3. The Applicant shall be responsible for keeping all streets o = clean and free of debris at all times. 0• W 4. All grading work shall be done during normal working hours of Z h the City of Edmonds, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. , do J,i-/// 6" MIN S. The Applicant shall be responsible for providing verification of the total amount of excavated material prior to finalizing the SWALE FLOW LINE grading permit. Verification shall be by letter from a licensed civil engineer stating that he or she has inspected the site and y that the grading conforms to Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building m SECTION Code, 1985 edition. _ 5 6. If deemed necessary by the City, the Applicant shall provide TOP OF SWALE traffic control during removal of the grading material. p SWALE FLOWLINE Z O KEY ROCK INTO _ 6'r MIN / ]'MAX H SWALE 3" MIN SUMP TO BE INSPECTED DAILY CLEAN WHEN DEBRIS EXCEEDS Z_ ROCK TO BE 4" MINUS 1/2 DEPTH QUARRY SPALLS PER V) WSDOT STD 9-13.1 0. TYPICAL CHECK DAM J NO SCALE O Z O CA V Z I' MIN 6" MAX v/ BERM AS READ � IV' MIN DEPTH F SLOPE - 0.5% MIN - 10% MAX O OCL TEMPORARY SWALE SECTION NO'SCALE (,(,f I... p 0 Z W SHEET NO.: 2 Of 2 JOB NO.: 88-4549 Fa 0