Loading...
16311 75TH PL W.PDFlill 11 lill 11 6073 16311 75TH PL W TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: J I cs l _ 000 0(0 z -0 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW COVENANTS(RECORDED CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: 7 PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DA SCALED PLOT PLAN DA SEWER LID FEE $: I , LID #: l SHORT PLAT FILE: ,5 - a- LOT: ` BLOCK:__ SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DA' SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: 0 SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: II j WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: L4 t % q I � q -7 /� OTHER:6�0,7-30,(V . m vt,8) k, L/ LATEMP\DSrs\FormslStreet File Checklist.doc TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants / 08 J U L 2 1990 August 19,1987 Project No. T-335 EINGINEFRINP Mr. Steve Anderson Group Four, Inc. 19502 56th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 90836 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Scully Short Subdivision (S-8-87) Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Anderson: We have completed the geotechnical study you requested for the Scully property on the - east side of 75th Place West in Meadowdale Beach. The site is located approximately as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. It includes Lots 62 and 63 of the Plat of Meadowdale Beach (5131). We understand that the owner intends to subdivide the property into three lots for single-family residential construction. Each of the three lots would have about 93 feet of frontage along 75th Place West. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the landslide hazard on the property and provide recommendations for site preparation and foundations for wood -framed residential construction. The work performed was described in our proposal dated May 20, 1987. It included standard penetration test borings, test pits, laboratory tests, and geotechnical engineering analyses. This report describes our explorations, reports our findings, and summarizes our conclusions and recommendations. 15301 N.E. 90th Street • Redmond, Washington 98052 • Phone: 881-5570 Mailing; Address: P.U. l3o\ 33:i9 • Redmond, Washington 96073 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The existing topography on the Scully property is illustrated on Figure 2. About forty percent of the site at the southeast corner is steeply sloped and virtually inaccessible. Tile remainder of the 2.5-acre site is relatively flat, accessible from 75th Place West, and buildable. The buildable portion of the site is part of an ancient landslide that'has remained active into:recent times and possibly�is still active. The original landslides are believed to have occurred several thousand years ago. Recent landslides that included this property occurred during the winter of 1946-47 and again during the 1960's. The extent of the downslope movements that occurred in these latest events is not known. The landslide hazards and risks in the Meadowdale Beach area were studied in 1979 by Roger Lowe Associates Inc. A map was produced that classified the various landslide hazards in the entire region and estimated occurrence probabilities. The buildable area on the Scully property was classified as previously failed material (slump) susceptible to additional movement. The possible occurrence.of additional landslides within 25 years was estimated to have a probability. of 90 percent. The Lowe report recommended groundwater control as likely the most economical measure for landslide risk reduction. Consequently, beginning in 1980, sanitary sewers, storm sewers for surface water control, and subsurface interceptor drains were installed at many locations within and on the margins of the Meadowdale landslide complex. Since that time, a lowering of the groundwater table has been documented. In 1985, G eoEngineers, Incorporated evaluated the effects of the improved surface and subsurface drainage and concluded that the probability of landslide occurrence had been reduced in those areas believed to be most susceptible to failure. On the Scully property, the probability that the old slump material might move again within the 25-year period is now estimated at 30 percent. Project No. T-335 Page No. 2 • Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 In 1983, as part of the LID No. 210 work, Interceptor Drain No. 3 was installed on the north margins of the Scully property. In 1986, an interceptor drain system was installed in the 164th Street S.W. right-of-way at the south side of the property. This latter installation collects some surface water that originates on the Scully property, but does not adequately intercept hillside seepage that now percolates into the old slump material at the toe of the slope. We recommend. installing a new interceptor drain along the toe of the slope on the Scully property. This drain will remove additional groundwater and increase the stability of the slump material on the buildable part of the site. The risk of landslide on the Scully property, in our opinion, will be reduced, but not eliminated. After this additional reduction in landslide risk is achieved, in our opinion, the buildable area on the Scully property west of the steep hillside will be suitable for residential construction, provided the present owners and all future lot owners are properly informed of the landslide risk that exists and accept full responsibility for it. Our explorations described below confirm that the buildable areas of the property are underlain by landslide debris and recent uncontrolled fill. The upper ten to 20 feet of this material consists of loose to medium dense silty sands and soft to stiff clayey silts with wood debris. The soils below these materials are more compact silty fine sands and laminated clayey silts. These latter materials probably are part of the Whidbey Formation, as defined in the 1979 Lowe report. Our test borings do not confirm whether or not these Whidbey soils on the Scully property are landslide rnateri s.—The _ laminations we observed are nearly horizontal but the soil is wetter and not as hard as typical undisturbed glacially compacted soils. The material may be part of a large slide block that moved with little rotation or distortion. However, we believe the recent movements on the Scully property most likely were confined to the upper slump material, which is much looser and wetter. In our opinion, wood -framed single-family residential construction on this .property may be supported on conventional spread foundations, provide&a compacted gravel pad at. least two feet thick is constructed:. to. provide -suitable bearing for the footings. However, better foundation performance likely would be obtained from pile foundations driven into the°firmer soils. at depths 15 to 20. feet. We recommend treated timber piles. Other deep foundations, such as augercast piles, may also be considered. Project No. T-335 Page No. 3 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 The use of deep foundations on this site will reduce the risk that unsuitable bearing materials that may be present at shallow depths might cause excessive settlements. The deep foundations recommended likely wQuldnot, much reduce property damage if a future landslide occurred on the site. Consequently, deep foundations should not be viewed by property owners as a measure to reduce their landslide risk. As an added safety measure, we recommend establishing a building -setback line.about.50 feet from the toe of the bluff. This 50-foot buffer zone will provide a catchment area for debris that may from time to time slide from the steep slopes east of the building areas. To maintain the full 50-foot width of the buffer zone, the debris should be cleared periodically. The following sections of this report discuss our findings and present our recommendations in greater detail. Our report has been prepared specifically for this project. It is intended -for the exclusive use of the property owners and their representatives. Our work has used methods and procedures consistent with local foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We do not guarantee project performance in any respect, only that our work meets normal standards of professional care. _.. SITE SURFACE CONDITIONS The Scully property in Meadowdale Beach is on the east side of 75th Place West immediately north of the unimproved 164th Street S.W. right-of-way. It includes Parcels 62 and 63 of the Meadowdale Beach Plat (5131). The present surface conditions on the property are a result of both natural processes and modification by man. Existing grades vary from Elev. 80 feet adjacent 75th Place West to Elev. 250 at the east property line. The southeast 40 percent of the site is steeply sloped. The northwest portion is a gently sloping terrace with average ground surface gradients in the range of 15 percent. A gravel road enters the property along the north boundary. The two parcels contain about 2.5 acres and measure roughly 270 feet north to south and 440 feet east to west. Single-family residences occupy land north and south of the property. A residence east of the property is sited well behind the crest of the bluff. Project No. T-335 Page No. 4 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 - Vegetation on the west end of the site is dominated by 20-year old alders. Trees on the steep slope are mostly alders and maples. Blackberry and salmonberry bushes abound on the site and horsetails are numerous in areas wet with seepage. At the time of our field exploration in July, the western portion of the site was firm and free of seepage up to the base of the bluff. Water could be seen seeping from the bluff, mostly from coarser sand seams. The seepage accumulates in a low area of the base of the bluff and drains southward in a shallow swale that terminates at a riprapped catchment area in the 164th Street S.W. right-of-way. The talus at the base of the bluff and the surrounding area is saturated and soft. Neighbors in the area indicated that a previous owner had regraded the property. Trees in the western area were removed and the hummocky terrain was flattened to provide space for a proposed mobile home park. Evidence can be seen that a sizeable cut was made into the central portion of the bluff face. A fill pad was constructed on the east side of Parcel 62. An extensive system of surface and subsurface drains has been constructed on and in the vicinity of the property. In the early to mid-1980's, the City of Edmonds implemented the Local Improvement District (LID) No. 210. Sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and interceptor drains were installed in an effort to reduce the excessive water in the Meadowdale landslide complex. Part of this work was a combination storm/interceptor system installed on the Scully property close to the north boundary. A few years later, another storm -interceptor drain system was constructed within the 164th Street S.W. right-of-way from 75th Place West to the base of the bluff. From there, it climbs the bluff southward. Thus, this drain is entirely south of the Scully property. However, as described above, surface drainage from the Scully property near the toe of the bluff is collected at one of the manholes in the system. Project No. T-335 Page No. 5 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration of the three proposed subdivision lots was performed on july 1, 1987. Subsurface conditions were explored by drilling two standard enetration test borings to depths of 26 and 37 feet below the existing grade. The borings were performed by Drilling Unlimited, Inc. of Olympia, Washington using a skid -mounted drill rig. Hollow -stem augers were used to advance and support the boreholes. In addition, seven test pits were excavated with a Case backhoe operated by Dave Biddle of Lynnwood, Washington. The test pits were completed at depths that varied from seven to 14 feet. The locations of the borings and pits were estimated by rough measurements from features shown on the property survey plan provided to us. The approximate locations are shown on the Exploration Plan, Figure 2. Ground surface elevations at the boring and the test pit locations were interpolated from contours shown on the site plan provided to US. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineering geologist from our firm. He classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test boring and pit, collected representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. In each boring, the consistency of the soils penetrated was sampled using standard penetration tests (SPT) performed at intervals not greater than five feet. The test procedures used - were in general accordance with ASTM D-1586. The results of these tests are the N- values reported on the boring logs. All samples recovered were visually classified in accordance with the system described on Figure 3. The boring logs are included in this report as Figures 4 and 5. These logs represent our interpretation of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The soils encountered in the test pits were examined and described using the system described on Figure 3. Logs of the test pits are presented on Figures 4 through 9. The bare slope exposures on the eastern part of the site permitted the soil types, continuity of units, hydrologic conditions and relative stability of the hillside in this area to be observed. Project No. T-335 Page No. 6 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 Representative soil samples obtained from the test borings and pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for additional examination and testing. The moisture content of all samples was measured. In addition, sieve analyses and an Atterberg limit test were run to aid in properly classifying the soils. The results of these tests are reported on the boring and test pit logs. Groundwater observation wells were installed in both test borings and in three of the seven test pits. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Both test borings encountered fill and slide debris to depths of ten to 15 feet. The fill and the debris are virtually indistinguishable. This material is relatively loose and becomes very moist to wet a few feet below the surface. It consists of intermixed tan and blue -gray silty sand and clayey silt, often containing angular blocks of clayey silt, minor gravel and occasional buried trees and brush. Similar material was encountered in all the test pits. In most of the pits, it extended below the pit bottom. The fill and debris is underlain by gray stiff to very stiff laminated silts and clays with interbedded sand seams. These fine-grained soils probably belong to the interglacial Whidbey Formation, as defined by the 1979 Lowe report. The bedding in the sediments we drilled is roughly horizontal, implying that the borings either were made in a coherent slide block that has undergone negligible rotation or that the sediments have not moved appreciably since they were deposited. The Whidbey material encountered in our test borings has relatively low SPT N-values and high water content. Similar soils were classified "landslide material' in the 1979 Lowe report. Several Lowe borings that reached deep enough encountered sediments with refusal N-values. This very hard materials reported to be the undisturbed Whidbey Formation. We conclude that the Whidbey soils at shallow depth on the Scully property may be remnant blocks from ancient landslides. Project No. T-335 Page No. 7 • Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 GROUNDWATER Groundwater on this site flows generally westward toward Browns Bay. In July when our field work was completed, groundwater was seeping from sand seams exposed on the bare bluff at the east side of the property. Soils near the toe of the bluff were saturated nearly to the ground surface. The wet soils encountered in the test borings suggest that surface water that infiltrates the debris probably flows westward downslope in the debris above the Whidbey soils. DISCUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The Scully property lies within the boundaries of the Meadowdale landslide area studied _ in 1979 by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc. The purpose of that study was to classify the various landslide hazards that were present in different areas and evaluate the risk that a landslide event might occur. Three categories of possible landslides were identified on the Scully property: 1) avalanches of slope debris from the steep slope at the east side of the site; 2) landslides in steep slope materials that have never before failed; and 3) renewed movements of existing landslide materials. The first two categories were considered to have relatively low risk, only a two to five percent chance of occurrence within a period of 25 years. The. possibility that a failure in the third category would occur within 25 years was believed to,be about 90 percent. The high =risk area on the site included -all the relatively flat ground west of the steep slope. As described above, the depth of old landslide material on that part of the site is at least 10 _ to 20 feet and may extend much deeper into the Whidbey Formation. Project No. T-335 Page No. 8 11 • Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 After the Lowe report was issued, the City of Edmonds installed sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and subsurface interceptor drains in an effort to remove excessive groundwater from the Meadowdale landslide complex. In 1985, GeoEngineers Incorporated evaluated the effects of this drainage. They concluded ..that the -landslide hazard had been significantly reduced. in,those areas that.:had the highest risk.' Areas that originally.were bdlieved to have occurrence probabilities of 90 percent in 25 years are now rated at 30 percent in 25. years. In our opinion, if the Scully property is developed, the landslide hazard should be reduced even further. To accomplish this, we recommend that the following two measures be taken: 1) installation of a deep interceptor drain near the base of the bluff; and (1 2). establishment of a building setback line about 50 feet from the toe of the slope. These two measures will reduce the landslide hazard on the Scully property considerably, but they will not entirely eliminate the hazard. After this additional reduction in landslide hazard is achieved, in our opinion, the relatively flat area west of the 50-foot setback line will be suitable for single-family residential construction, provided the present owners and all future lot owners are properly informed of the landslide risk that exists and accept full responsibility for it. The following sections of this report present more detailed geotechnical recommendations for developing this property. These recommendations should be incorporated into the project design and construction. Project No. T-335 Page No. 9 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 Interceptor Drain At the present time, surface runoff, rainfall and seepage from the bluff percolate into the ground near the base of the bluff. Some of this water may be collected by the existing interceptor drain systems in the 164th Street S.W. right-of-way and on the north margins of the property. However, because the pervious slope debris on the site is deeper than the existing drains, much of the water undoubtedly passes under the drains and continues on downslope. This water contributes to the potential instability of the existing landslide debris and increases the landslide hazard on the Scully property. In order to remove the groundwater that now passes under the existing drains, we recommend installing a deep interceptor drain east of the proposed 50-foot building setback line near the toe of the slope. The interceptor drain should extend into the Whidbey Formation, a depth likely to be in the range of twelve to 15 feet. We recommend using slotted or perforated ABS drainpipe eight inches in diameter. The pipe should be bedded in washed gravel and wrapped with filter cloth, approximately as shown on Figure 10. The drain should discharge to the existing storm sewer system. Since the drain invert elevations likely will be deeper than any of the manholes in the existing interceptor system, the new drain may have to be extended to the storm sewer along 75th Place West. All sections of the drain west of the 50-foot setback line should be tightlined. Several cleanouts should be provided. Conventional Spread Foundations As indicated above, the near -surface soils on the buildable portion of the Scully property are uncontrolled fills and debris from old landslides. This material contains wood debris and has a significant component of wet plastic clay. In our opinion, the performance of conventional spread foundations bearing on this material is unpredictable. Settlements in the range of a few inches may occur. Consequently, spread foundations should be used for single-family wood -framed construction only if the risk that settlements of this magnitude may occur is acceptable. Project No. T-335 Page No. 10 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 If spread foundations are used, we recommend stripping the site and placing a building pad of imported gravel. The pad should be at least two feet thick below foundations and twelve inches thick beneath slab -on -grade floors. The subgrade under the gravel pad should be proofrolled before any gravel is placed. Any soft places located should be excavated to firm ground and stabilized with gravel or rock spalls. The gravel pad should be placed in layers about eight inches thick and compacted to dry densities at least 90 percent of its ASTM D-1557 maximum dry density. The compacted gravel pad recommended will reduce the risk of unsatisfactory foundation performance, but it will not eliminate the risk. Deep Foundations Because the near -surface soils on this site will not, in our opinion, provide dependable support for conventional spread foundations, we recommend using deep foundations _ bearing in the firm Whidbey soils at depths of approximately 15 to 20 feet. Suitable deep foundations for the soil conditions on this site include timber piles and augercast piles. With the residences supported on deep foundations, the ground floors, in our opinion, should be framed over crawl spaces. Garage floors, however, may be slab -on -grade. We _ recommend isolating all slab -on -grade floors from the building foundations and from all other structures. Timber piles should be treated with preservative and should have a minimum tip circumference of 22 inches. They should be driven into the firm Whidbey soils that underlie the near -surface compressible materials. We estimate that pile capacities in the range of ten to 15 tons can be obtained with the pile tips in the range of 20 to 25 feet below the present ground surface. The necessary pile driving resistances, blows per foot, may be estimated using the Engineering News formula. Augercast piles, if used, should be at least twelve inches in diameter. We estimate that augercast piles embedded at least seven feet into the firm Whidbey soils can be designed for loads of 20 tons. Project No. T-335 Page No. 11 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 Roof and Area Drains Rainwater from roofs and any surface water collected on this site should be conveyed in tight lines and discharged directly to the storm sewer system. Impact on Neighboring Property In our -opinion, the :presence of single-family wood -framed residential construction on this .property. will have no adverse:impact. on the landslide hazards .that affect this property and the neighboring property. The:iriterceptor drain recommended should lower the groundwater table and reduce the current risk of landslide on the Scully property and on the property downslope from the site. Construction on the Scully property will not affect the stability of the bluff and thus will not adversely affect neighboring property to the east. The present vegetation on the steep slopes at the east side of the property should be maintained. Trees that might topple onto the buildings may be trimmed back but should not be removed. Catch basins and storm drain lines should be kept clear of debris and free -flowing. During construction, barren soils should be covered with straw and hydroseeded to reduce erosion. Lawns should be sodded as soon as possible after construction is completed. Additional Services As development plans proceed, we recommend that Terra Associates, Inc. be requested to review earthwork and foundation plans so that our recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented. In order to verify compliance with the project plans, specifications, and the recommendations presented herein, and to allow expedient design changes in the event subsurface conditions are encountered that differ from those anticipated, we also recommend that Terra Associates, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical observation and testing services during construction. Project No. T-335 Page No. 12 Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on the present site conditions and the assumption that the subsurface conditions throughout _ the site are not significantly different from those disclosed by the explorations. If, during construction, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in the explorations are observed or appear to be present, Terra Associates, Inc. should be advised at once so that we can review those conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. If a substantial lapse of time occurs between the submission of this report and the start of work at the site, or if conditions change due to natural causes or to construction operations at or adjacent the site, this report should be reviewed in order to evaluate whether or not its conclusions and recommendations are applicable, considering the changed conditions or the time lapse. Project No. T-335 Page No. 13 v � '� 3�V�d ytsL c c C 0 0 0 ° d a _ U C U O ._ O y O 0) t9 .10 U) �j E° E° o N x m X y N !0 n o ° o n w ` UJ d nE aE m n 0 a = < « c Q Z Q Z U O m 07 T � T ° f �co 0 0 z tco — Mr. Steve Anderson August 19, 1987 CLOSURE The following figures are included and complete this report: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site Plan — Figure 3 Soil Classification System Figures 4 and 5 Boring Logs Figure 6 through 9 Test Pit Logs Figure 10 Typical Interceptor Drain Design Detail We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. Please contact us whenever we may be able to assist you, and please call if you have any questions concerning our report. Sincerely yours, _ TERRA ASSOCIATES, INC. w Anil Butail, P.E. 2 0� President &- °I % 8'ONAI E� JJ/AB:mf Project No. T-335 Page No. 14 (:irk'. • M&I 11.,.L _-- i jr i E .,:r:`Ts`✓� r. JILA�• r 1 ',Y•, fit �-- •..4�•••,r777�3tN /1 L� �_I__Y. ..�� a 1 � ► •F.lt.l'Aiiur r r•....,•': f.' j� . kii • ► �^ , +� .la' I.'•r�1yr •u E f'll'.r1"J • r • . 7 7�.tf �i !� rL�• r`��tr.i � i' t • 1� Cj'��yll F3 pp i j 1 ,, , . 11 y, ,••+:• r 7►I ll f• � h,: •, uL -1. 1� .ri�ilti ��Aic•v.�. x s.(G ..i + (Sif�'rt1,I A tiy' I�!-I • �, u7r 3 [` •fry 1 wT r J;i rWi1�+1-Yery.i 'i12 '}cL-..r�`.�.�i.i�• -� UCt:i6'�..+.! L. rlo7�i','-1��.,:�: n 61 J� J 1.+ r • .. ;I17if ii�1::,?•ji ;ntCT 41� F4 r Plr—" I:�:6 1. ✓). �fjFla�^L1�) r� jY•�E.�s.Lr•�.yt t y7 F L.t �J 7� Y ri(('' �.,!",',�.1,•� 7i Irb '*.+'h , ' ��L�'T'.1�ur'i✓;rr1'. i`'.L'` �•f/ Ij+Lt["�•i' r♦ t ! I• +il•�1.. f2kr.. ��'1�.•� �il.".I' �7: •i• � ti"2. �.Y r:o<'v'a'►'�:o••r. s :; EF: {:!�." i 1•., 1' • / ,�lit�-f,i:L/� �1 rq Lam• j '"•J.L i� � F v v v iA +4�3 / L+%.�J� ' I .. IiII r7�::. r r ' � • •. � ' •l�'f •"�4a� ��iia �•�'r 1 j. .)::P; �p'!y'• � ►�� �yiyN.J J'.��r F i..< 1' 't.1+ ,r.y , =•i'. it ti e 'c7 1„ r rq. rn ��7'•�, �. �, l`+I1 t •� a��il�,�• r 1 k. '• J . 711. 1 . • 1 �' +!��':�\;�r • �•:i�-iyl•.-r••ti �� � �+ W:�I�;Dlit v �yy�l�+� ti <<'�•` �' � � ; , v�4:��D�•i Jry t r � 1 �• � ..:_1� _J <�: i•+•���.,�. !.,l•+�.'a•� n � r��. .��1 f� •�7t .. ` F � 1 rr� i• � 4 v.y •I.�a J.. I, � t •>'1`.'i,�F•�Ii.J.•f)• '•• �•. 'f 1+', (.Jw,/� 7 1`�r• ,'^I_. " , -I .. , ,p�;•- •i:ji�i:a��� J�j' �'1 ,. •� �.:• 1 '''t lit,y.. r' � a.Il. ll'Ldl •�: (� ,r.• t.0 ,i + •.� •:�1 .L C%•�•y�r. �• a .1�,,.F1 �.. ��Itl; .-.. Al , --Ulmw' �(^^ � JI^�t�tri•. �:�uiG � .,11" � i,.i �: ^'' { 1:}C° rS•, �r.li�inL] Fi�•�\�i''�� 1 � ;., il_ d' ( ; to r° t ,n:%� :-� •'i r �{ L• 'r a ;�:,:. r• .`n:'•rsli � i :.�y/y�. �1 1 1F , ��{YL,u >J ct,^ �� -v.,t ;�►�` [ r �e a%Iv..Jl;' --r;. �I.i{7.. i,.',1•• i) � ir!-r it F7ii- J� f �;.� • �' �1i(', •�� r � .`.. 1 � •rA i..f� it!. �••„ �' " i 7 t •f" pr:,i:. r r R, i I r OD, • 7t. i l+'�ii: a_ i»�I 1E.cr.r1 Z t' 1r i� M 30VId 91gl v c c co m c c 0 0 o, � a o o m Q � U Qlm 01{— td 'j E° E° .; � o _ uJ m O m O aE o.E N A -i ° J to ¢ z a z V o m e y T p z 0 H 0 cc z W = LN 0Q a� J � J Z 00 N Q W lL r, •T O a Cl) M Z a` c O A r u I_1 Group PRIMARY DIVISIONS Symbol SECONDARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS Clean GW well graded gravels. gravel -sand mixtures more than half Gravels little or no fines. GP poorly graded gravels or gravel -sand mixtures little or no fines. cd > A 0 as c 8 N c c w c of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve (less than 5% fines Gravel with fines GM silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures, non -plastic fines. GC clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mixtures plastic fines. SANDS more than half of coarse Clean Sands (less than SW well graded sands. gravelly sands, little or no fines. SP poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, 8 a0i e S '" Cq fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve 5% fines little or no fines. Sands with fines SM ailty sands, sand -silt mixtures, non- plastic fines. SC clavey sands, sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. -- 4) 0 o SILTS AND CLAYS liquid limit is less than 50% ML inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour. silty or clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity. CL inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity W c '3 y N C7 � b o w G4 8 A gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays. lean clays. OL organic silts and organic clays of low plaatici SILTS AND CLAYS liquid limits is greater than 50% MH inorganic silts, micaceous or diatom- ceous fine sandy or silty soils elastic. CH inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOUS PT peat and other highly organic soils. DEFINITION OF TERMS U. S. S 2DO rd Series sieve 10 4 Cle r Square Sieve Openings 4� L 1211 SILTS & CLAYS SAND GRAVE COBBLE BOULDER fine medium coarse fine I coarse GRAIN SIZES SANDS,GRAVELS, STANDARD AND NON -PLASTIC PENETRATION SILTS very loose 0- 4 loose 4-10 medium dense 10-30 dense 30-50 very dense over 50 RELATIVE DENSITY PLASTIC SILTS Unconfined Compressiv'A STANDARD AND CLAYS Stre th ENETRATIOI� very soft 0- 1/4 0 - 2 soft 1/4 - 1/2 2- 4 firm 1/2-1 4-8 stiff 1-2 8-16 very stiff 2 -4 16-32 hard I over 4 over 32 CONSISTENCY TERUNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM RA ASSOCIATES SCULLY PROPERTY (3eotechnical Consultants EDMONDS 9 WASHINGTON Proj. No. 335 Date July'8 Figure 3 BORING NO. Logged By ii Date 7/1/87 ELEV. Graph us CS Soil Description Depth (ft.) Sample (N) Blows W Ft. Brown, sandy SILT with roots, damp. ML Blue -gray, clayey SILT intermixed with .Z.* brown silty SAND with wood debris, very SM moist, soft and loose. 5 25.3 (Fill/Slide Debris) 5 6 23.1 With silt clasts, wet. 1 6. 10 6 35.3 ML Gray, horizontally laminated, clayey silt, moist, very stiff. MH 15 22 29.0 20 28 27.9 25 36 28. Test Boring completed at 261 feet; Groundwater observation well installed to 26-i feet, slotted to 621 feet; Groundwater measured at 9 feet 2 inches July 6, 1987. TERRA BORING LOG SCULLY PROPERTY ASSOCIATES EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants . I Proj. No. 3357Date July'87 lFigure 4 • 0 BORING NO. 2 Logged By JJ Date 7/1/87 Graph CS Soil Description ML Brown sandy SILT with roots, damp._ ML Brown and gray, sandy SILT with clay, trace gravel, some iron -staining, very moist, soft to firm. (Fill/Slide Debris) Olive gray, intermixed SAND, sandy SILT and clayey SILT, trace gravel with some organics, wet, firm. (Fill/Slide Debris) ELEV. Depth (N) (ft.) Sample Blows IM 5 10 ML Gray, sandy SILT, horizontally bedded, 15 / clayey SILT and silty SAND interbeds, - MH wet, medium dense. SM 20 7 25 7 23.7 5 25.5 ��ym 11 W.4 14 0.7 ML Gray, clayey SILT with minor horizontal 30 15 34.1 / sand interbeds,.very moist, very stiff. MH Test Boring completed at 36 feet. groundwater observation well set at 36 eet. Groundwater measured at 23; feet-7/6/87 35 20 1.7 TERRA BORING LOG SCULLY PROPERTY ASSOCIATES EDMONDS, WASHINGTON • Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. 335 Date July'87 Figure 5 Looged By ii Date 7/1/87 Depth (ft.) LISCS 0 — 5 10 15 TEST PIT NO. 1 Soil Description Elev. W M ML Brown, sandy SILT, with roots and organics, damp. ML Brown and gray, iron stained, clayey SILT and no intermixed sand, silt clasts and wood, moist to water SM very moist, firm. 7/6/87 Wood debris at 61 feet. (Fill/Slide Debris) Wood debris and large blocks of lammated silt at 10 feet. Test Pit completed at 12 feet; No visible seepage or caving. U Loggod By ii Date 7/1/87 TEST PIT NO. 2 0 -A 10 15 E lev. -fftown, TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS SCULLY PROPERTY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 335 1 Date Juily'87 I Figure 6 Logged By JJ Date 7/1/87 Depth (ft.) USCS 0 5 10 15 TEST PIT NO. Soil DescriDtion Elev. W NO ML rown, sandy SILT with roots and organic mate ial, ML Brown, sandy SILT with clay some wood debris and silt clasts, moist, firm to stiff. (Fill/Slide Debris) ML Gray, clayey and sandy SILT, moist, firm to stiff. (Fill/Slide Debris) Stump or log at 7 feet. Test Pit terminated at 71 feet on log or stump; No seepage or caving noted. (Fill/ Slide Debris) Logged By J—_ Date 7/1/s7 TEST PIT N0. _ 0 5 10 15 Elev. ML Brown, sandy SILT with roots, damp, medium dense. (Fill/Slide Debris) ML / Brown, sandy SILT and silty SAND, some wood debris, damp, medium dense. SM Fill Slide Debris ML Gray, iron —stained, sandy SILT with clay and silt clasts and organics, moist to very moist. Test Pit completed at 101 feet. /7"'T.1 TERRA -- - ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS SCULLY PROPERTY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 335 Date July'87 Figure 7 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 R 5 10 15 TEST PIT No. 5 Logged By JJ pate __ 7/1/87 Elev. W LISCS Soil Description M Brown, sandy SILT with roots, very moist. Sm ML Gray and brown, iron stained silty SAND and sandy SILT, very moist to wet, loose to medium dense. (Fill/Slide Debris) Gray, laminated SILT, medium dense, wet. Tet Pit terminated in undisturbed soil at 121 feet. Logged By ii Date 7/1/87 TEST PIT NO. Elev. SM Brown, silty SAND with roots, damp. ML Gray and brown, clayey, sandy SILT and intermixed X SM silty SAND, very moist, firm to medium stiff. (Fill/Slide Debris) X. C ML Organic rich, sandy SILT with wood. I.T. ML S1 Gray and brown, iron -stained, sandy, clayey SILT and silty SAND, very moist to wet, medium dense. (Fill/Slide Debris) Test Pit completed at 13 feet 3 inches. / -7- TERRA WMASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS SCULLY PROPERTY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 335 1 Date July"87 I Figure a �, r 10, RECEIVED CITY CLER K OCT 0 2 1996 CITY OF EDMONDS NOTIFICATION OF COVENANT 505 BELL STREET EDMONDS, WA 98020 INDIFI EMNCATION & HOLD HARMLESS PERMIT CQUNTEA Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS .of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: 1. Description of Subject Prop&r1y. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of 11 7S i 4 P L. UA,� S i , Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: The north 91.14 feet of Tract 62, Meadowdale Beach, as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. Except the west 10.00 feet thereof. Lot 3 of S8-87 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above -referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's report and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number C— 'Lo on file with the City of Edmonds Building Division. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser; lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Planning Division, City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from.and out of such development. In addition, the GINNERS or, behalf of n themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and C C GUILDING NOV 2 2 1996 VOL.3223RGE0379 hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. OWNERS specifically reserve to themselves the claims set forth in a notice of claim submitted to the City Clerk of the City of Edmonds on March 22, 1996, and nothing herein shall be interpreted to waive or release or to require indemnification for the claims set forth in said notice which arose prior to the date of execution of this agreement. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/has not specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy or public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: (insert insurance requirements/time period) 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. DONE this day of t�C:� 03t�i� , 19q. -OWNER(S) n By: I/ - By: UM -2- 10 `0 a2 VOL. 3 2 2 3 PAGE 0 3& 0 • • Q i1 (0'�/ tO W X STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that CARL P . PEARSON signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/At) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 2ND day of OCTOBER , 19 96. Jp�O�j4� � i (Stamp or a 13� =QTAq�• ;7k ;0 __ "� • �""' NOTARY PUBLIC Ogg dA4 b.' PATRICIA E. JODOCK Printed Name �j�,�F•WA� My Commission Expires: JUNE 10 , _ z000 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that POLLY P. PEARSON signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be ,(AYVher) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentien:;d in this instrument. DATED this 2ND day of OCTOBER , 19 96. �`��G `, E. jp"'ii ��� �Q` •p�(YENT �0, ��� (Stamp or��'o oi'•� y A = 91.•* _ wee- WS . 0 I t 96101 7 110.3 02 NOTARY PUBLIC PATRICIA E. JODOCK Printed Name My Commission Expires: JUNE 10, 2000 -3- VOL.3223PhGE0381 • • PLANNING DATA NAME: 6W3 , �` wesoA1 J✓�i�s`• SITE ADDRESS: 7EL G. DATE:_T3�/�� ZONING: PLAN CHK#: �� - /70 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S CORNER LOT (Yes/No) SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: /Ootfl�- P1 Front:_�—teft Side:1Side: 13 Rear: 2S Actual Setbacks: AV ,#y( 5 9 Front: G/]�? Left Side: /CD R+ght Side: 1' Rear: Street map checked for additional setback required? o (Yes/No) LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED b (Y/N) LOT COVERAGE: d a Maximum Allowed: 0 Actual: S jz- cc, rj/-T� F,tv 14co,�f-- BUILDING HEIGHT: r — Maximum Allowed: zs 120, / ZS Actual Height: Vi s, 7r� () � Z 7,1/6 6i4�v 0, Datum Point: �s - �� �• rc • 0• <o. Datum Elevation: SUBDIVISION: CRITICAL AREAS #:_ %/y` I SEPA DETERMINATION: LOT AREA: % , -7fl ' S OTHE Plan Review By: SOJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST* PROJECT NAME: PLAN CHECK #: 71 PROJECT ADDRESS: /6)3//- 7,5tA- �L, 40, RECEIPT DATE: 7--3/-g R VI, 1 -0; BY n i ........ . ...... ... ..... ............ ......... ..... .. ....... ....... ............ ... WATER . ......QMMFNT� ft:5, SetbacksNariance/Setback Adjustment Conditional Use Permit ADB Requirements Other Zoning Requirements Underground Wiring Requir d -5--M I - - - - - - - - - - .... ... Lot Slope 15% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit I ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tree Cutting Plan Plat Subdivision Requirements .......... Legal Description Verification Quit Claim Street Dedications Easements -Public/Private ................ . ..... Engineering to Drain Review Fee . . . . . . . . . . -K � Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee ........... Drainage Plan (On -Site) Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses 1 41. Setback - Storm Drain Line m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Open Ditch - Existing Culvert Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r1 Culvert Size Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff .................................. ............................. Catch Basin Required Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access 4* Sidewalk Required Curb& Gutter Required Curb Cut For Driveway Requiredncv Street Paving Required ......... ......... ............. - 2 . . .... Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required tt95 Street Name Sign Required Other Signing Required 1,t&Z FO-Cl A-ko Bond Required For Public Improvements FEMA Map Check/Water Table 32.-, Side Sewer Availability qE.5 .5 -W, �'7 ..... ....... Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # ?,uo ............ % ....... ..................... Create Street File ...... . ... I ......... .... .. Existing Water Main Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "36 .... Water Meter Size Service Line Size .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Water Meter Charge Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I...............................L ............... "" . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Hydrant Required Hydrant Size Existing . . . .. . Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler IStreet Cut IMiscellaneous Reviewed By: FIRE PLANNING ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS � PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS To: Applicant From: Lyle .Chrisman, Engineering Inspector Owner: Plan Check No: q� % U Address• l631 1 16�6 rt, W Date:I' After review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met: 1. Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A.M.-10:00 P.M.WEEKENDSIHOLIDAYS —10:00 A.M.-6:00 PAL 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 18.60) . . 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. ' 4. Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 1830.030d) 5. NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING. (ECDC 18.30.50G) 5. FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. (ECDC 1830) 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTIMM AND CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BAC KFIdLING. (ECDC 1830) 3. Repair or replace all defective existing curk gutty and sidewalk adjacent to the property. if an intersection h involved, a handicap ramp may be required. ContracWr shall meet with the City Engineering staffto determine the CdW of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) �. Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14 Waiver granted to , %. (ECDC 18.80.060D) p ; t WpAtV C t L�iF�I j-VAr(-;?j GJ f i��.l r 10. Driveways must be paved from property tine to City RIGHT-0I-WAY. A separate permit is requir+e& (ECDC 18.80.060C) IL INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRTiJEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 1830) 12. No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Re Department. 13. Connection to City water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.20) A. A back water valve is required if downstairs plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole.. (ECDC 7.20) i5. Water and sewer math lines should be separated by 10 fed minimum (ECDC 1&10) 6. ConnectiI on Lto the City sanitary *-An is required. A separate permit is rnTilred. I Fees paid: Yes v No Charge (ECDC 18.10} 7. Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alter adons, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.90) 8. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC 1890) ST R (_ E Tj j E 7Jd 9 r FILL AND OLD LANDSLIDE DEBRIS 87HEY FLE GRADE TO DRAIN TO SEWER. 12"min. :�•>: ',:,.,, depth varies ° WHIDBEY FORMATION SOILS min.. width COMPACTED NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL FREE —DRAINING BACKFILL COMPOSED OF WASHED GRAVEL, PEA GRAVEL, ETC. FILTER FABRIC 8 INCH PERFORATED OR SLOTTED PIPE. SLOPE 0.5% MINIMUM -TO STORM DRAIN. Typical. Interceptor Drain NOT —TO —SCALE NOTE: METHOD OF DRAIN INSTALLATION AND THE TRENCH SIDEWALL STABILITY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF' THE CONTRACTOR. ='M.TERRA • ASSOCIATES • Gootochnical Consultants TYPICAL INTERCEPTOR DRAIN DETAIL SCULLY . PROPERTY EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 335 1Date July'87Figure 10 F EXP1eE,5 CITY OF EDMONDS �o 890.1q SIDE SEWER PERMIT PERMIT I'� 1 8 e, Address of Construction: Property Lggal Description (Include all easements): WOOD LINE Owner and/or Contractor: NV 10, r *050 D"I State License No. CII�2: ,�1 —���-7 'ng Permit No. Single Family Invasion into City Right-of-Way:%No ❑ Yes ❑ Multi -Family (No. of Units ) RW Construction Permit No. ❑ Commercial Cross other Private Property ASCNo ❑ Yes ❑ Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement I certify that I have read and shall comply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. /.S Date * CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION * OFFICE 118E ONLY * FOR INSPECTION CALL 77+ 20.2, PUBLIC W( Permit Fee: (D _ Issued By Trunk Charge.. Date Issued. S Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Lid No.: 2=__1 Partial Inspection: Comments RKS DEPT. * Date Initial Reason Rejected: Date Final Inspection Approved: Dal-- A(AlInitial , 4 r Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** Wbq® Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3'90 P4 w 04 momm; W z F 04 O 0 z U 0 z° 0 z O z F U � d A o H z a w OU a z 3 CL h W w A 4 O � x %9 :. Y1U¢ E tC tip Oit r� Si3 w CGak� abtR�� E:� pp s b- tDY Eri'riMf f�.� w v C;. i the infuYua:.ac th rr�: , inch a g ba:l Flo, d r t��, to the 10ca2ion of any c . v:, �: ..I shu , Stec s, ..v� st� , riy; �; may r arrd m y or r, th►c�ai�; :E r�' I O o An,10 you emu! siyb to�eu�'oJui aya'o� e;q�Il ^q s:��;s s ?1140 z ,-doldwe sai nu spuou._ , ao q,io "y8 m3jou f*;,wlo hw p�2', Am Jo syn's ^: ;tons lqs NL ra 16 uV� oo1 eq2 ob you inq 'L;ariioui c'^w 3ql juvDLatiapui 62 j3npUO3 F1;'qq ¢• ! ': 3 � o.-:�o� F, go: io �e gad Auk dEw 3y; uo yasoj ;Js Guiy�4us z .? >� you '^op spa043 jo Agin ayl sgus,;nsuaouO L.-7 ,o (413 uql Aq e;sn aol n;,!!dwoo seen dew p-y3Em z a a ,D:U)Y% Ljll Uigl _ �� ,,uvm ON i lom z Wz° W A 0 3 0 o w - C z z � Ca O U z O Q Q o u z Q ° a z 'Zr Inli T m PaVsm e�rnauiis I - 1�0 311 � s� P i �l ��'E7- T F 0 L E -�o6,o0o VA upm e,Xeeu;hm W aytmuv�k /01 � 51 uq o CA q M �mp I�iia� � wr�✓� — � / � I o z p EOg0 IL �� i� 26a16gi (o31I -4S,u00 p�k U'JW1 OeM-'tiffi of aedNl�-�tf - � i 2,� �po� a-� k O,�pYOUc�I �_ u I -71 1 o r �,,.SDo p� d vvovk - 1 212q Ion �0 ,000 '�b"CI4 ej O DD �D D AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING AND REPAIR OF CURB WHEREAS, Carl and Polly Pearson (the "Pearson") have subdivided certain property located at 16319 75'h Place West, Edmonds, Washington and known as Lot 1 of the Pearson Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the lot was encumbered by debris flows from . landslides occurring in January and March of 1997; and WHEREAS, as a part of removal of the debris flow, the City, at its own behest, and by public contract, initiated certain clean up of said lot; and WHEREAS, such work was suspended prior to completion of the contract, and WHEREAS, there has been a repair and/or replacement of a section of concrete curbing on said lot but there is yet to be accomplished the installation of landscaping on the lot designed to enhance the stability of the lot and, to the extent that landscaping may accomplish such purpose, control erosion and the lessening of danger from future earth subsidence or landslide hazard, and WHEREAS, the City's public contractor was unable to complete the work and the property owners have indicated their desire to complete such work; NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter "City") and Carl and Polly Pearson, owners of certain real estate located 16319 75`" Place West, Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "Pearsons") in accordance with the promises and covenants contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived do hereby agree as follows: 1. Undertakings of Pearsons. 1.1 The Pearsons promise to utilize the $10,000 paid pursuant to paragraph 2 below for the installation of landscaping and vegetative cover in substantially the form and described in the attached Exhibit A therein as Phase II work. 1.2 To utilize $1,090 to repair and replace damaged curbing on the subject site. 1.3 To maintain records regarding the expenditure of such funds in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to make such records available for inspection by the Washington State Auditor or through an authorized representative of the City during normal working hours. 1W,f/ { WSS473760.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 2. In consideration of such promises, the City agrees to pay the sums of $10,000 for installation of landscaping and vegetative cover and $1,090, said sum being approximately equivalent to the $1,000 cost of installation of a curb and the sales tax attributable thereto. Said sums shall be paid in the following format: 2.1 $6,000 upon execution of this Agreement, and 2.2 $5,090 upon completion of the work. Work shall be deemed complete when the Pearsons notify the City Engineer of the completion of the work and the City Engineer has verified such installation by field inspectors by his authorized representative, and accepted such work in writing. Acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as a waiver of any claim which the Pearsons currently maintain against the City of Edmonds as described in Snohomish County Cause No. 99-2-05628-9. Similarly, however, the parties acknowledge that the City may claim any amounts expended hereunder as offsets to any damage alleged by the Pearsons in such lawsuit. 4. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties. Any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing with the express written consent of the parties hereto. PEAR NS: (� e ke��� Carl Pearson Polly Pe on CITY OF EDMONDS By: — lor-� — Ma or Garyptakenson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THEY ATTORNEY: W. Scott Snyder { WSS473760.DOC;1 /00006.900000/} AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING AND REPAIR OF CLW EXHIBIT A (Phase 1.1) Scope of Work: The restoration of the property located at 16319 75`h Place West, Edmonds, WA will include the following: 1. Removal and replacement of curb section damaged during construction. 2. Removal of debris flow that occurred dwiug'the construction sequence between curb and the rockery, and replacement of the rock materials. 3. Removal of dyad and failed landscaping materials from the slope placed by City' s public contractor. 4. Importing and placement of topsoil on the lower portion of the slope and adjacent to the City installed pipe. 5. Planting of landscaping materials, groundcover, plants, scrubs and trees on the lower slope to enhance stability, control erosion and visually screen the pipe. 6. Installation and operation of a temporary irrigation system as necessary for the establishment of a new vegetation. 7. Restoration of additional land areas where vegetation was removed, disturbed or compacted by equipment operated by the City's public contractor. Permits, Whereas the City of Edmonds had already provided permits for. it's own public contractor to perform the above work, no additional permits will' be required by the Pearsons or their private contractors for the above work. Completion of Work: Whereas the Pearson have received an estimate from a private contractor in excess of S 105,000 to restore hillside (approx. 8,000 sq. ft. damaged), it is understood by both the Pearsons and the City, that City's contribution of $10,000 to the restoration will repair about 10% (ten percent) of the damaged area, or 800 square feet. The placement of topsoil must begin at the bottom of the hill, and work towards the top. When restoration of 800 square.feet has been completed the Pearsons will notify the City Engineer. Upon acceptance by the City, the portion of the work covered under this agreement will be considered completed, and final payment will become due within 30 days of the date of acceptance. f SS496858.DOC,I/00006.05UZI)/} ,9/2009 12:12 TEL 4257876900 CARL PEARSON 121 005 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering June 27, 2002 Carl Pearson 16311 75`h Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Restoration of Property at 16319 75t" Place West Agreement for Installation of Landscaping and Repair of Curb Dear Carl; GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR With regard to the above subject', Lyle Chrisman performed a field inspection on June 26, 2002 and we have determined the required restoration, as outlined in the agreement of 8/24/01, has been met and is therefore accepted. The City will proceed with the processing a check in the amount of $5,090 as stipulated in the agreement. Sincerel , X DAVID K. GEBERT, PE City Engineer DKG/ALC/cmc LNCIICrtlp=oo-agreemm rr5l0tnti01J.due • Incorporated August Z1, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan f17C. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-771-0221 Website: wwwxLedmonds.wa.us PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division January 7, 2010 Carl Pearson 16311 75 h PI W Edmonds, WA 98026 RE: Stormwater Improvement Agreement Mr. Pearson, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The City of Edmonds entered into a stormwater improvement agreement with you on August 24, 2001. This agreement was filed with Snohomish County under recording number 200109190311 and a set of civil plans were approved by the City on November 20, 2001 allowing you to begin construction of the improvements. The City agreed to pay a sum of $30,000 in consideration of the promises contained within the agreement and more particularly your promise to install stormwater improvements and to maintain such improvements either personally or by your successors in interest in ownership in the subject site. All required storm improvements have been constructed and approved by the City of Edmonds. On December 29, 2009 a final payment of $12,500 was issued payable to Carl and Polly Pearson. The City has now fulfilled their commitment of $30,000 and no further payments will be made. Please feel free to contact me by e-mail at mcconne11aci.edmonds.wa.us or by phone at 425.771.0220 x1338 with any questions you may have. Sincerely, r Jeanie McConnell Engineering Program Manager c: Tod Moles, Street Supervisor Street File —16311 75 h PI W - Enclosures Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan T ai rn m IL N N IL T t� m � m 0 UC) o0 q 0 O 00 0 o 0 O E o o o E o0 0 C Q Q LO LO C N N V C. r T U E Q � Y O ti m 0 V y L yLO m 40- O tC Y � V O L > U y c t U O O) O) o o U 0) o 0-O Ct N fU O O O O N � CL N CD O O O J c a m %1 H m d. N LO +=. E O 4 6i M N r O) N r- �C O G v V d ap N N W U (O 0 0 (D E (O V E O O V �Q O Z 00 Z O O N C N N c N _ = N_ U 7 N CV = 0 '-T W d a W ¢ mm rn rn 0 0 >- N N J N N O U) m N N Q Z U- J 0 r- Z W CU W � o � O 0 o Q0.� E WO Lo c N U m W ~ Z O Z O Q. E a w Xa p 3 W Wp a o Z c m rn Q U c°`n v o `O nW. N > x Qo O Q O N p C p 2 U 'O p O N= (n (n 0) > d U) V U O ) UE U U pN C N N p UO O> O' r p N O p a a) O N O > CL I c N N (n E a) c N Z J I U) m = T u U) U) m E 7 V) U E 0 Q I I r d O a E Q v r 01 1.4 d N O O F- co co 0 Fj � y m u; G_ m ' V �U a_ 2 (DU)Qr-Z Q af 0 LL)Q (DQ t O LL. U W m coa> V C C� 0: = Z N U; m `Q J LL d V m d N m 00000 00 doo0oo 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 L 0 0 0 0 00) V LO LO O O LO N d N N N N Fes; ` v- � N N 1` d 0 0 0 0 0 >- N N N N N i•+ L �+ L L. a� CC v c'o c c U U U O o O O N N m i9 V 0 0 0 0 l O� CD 0 0 '. :.: a otoOO Lo N O In .1 �1 e?} 0 n. 0000 (D d 0 0 .,. O N N N N � ,•rf � � ti ti � NNNN , ~�00 ti y co t-- Ln (D -U)OO 01 u (D N O O =f .V 0 LO LO LO LO L a; m 0 0 0 0 a, o, m. w 0 0 0 0 d 0000 ,.. K N N N N N N N N QO 00 0 00 .:I •1 L 'O c "O E; i C 0 Q Q Q Q •r7 O LL LL LL LL c0 am 0 a) WLLWW I .i � C •C •C •C � o000 O'000 o 0 0 06 O. O O 0 Q O O Ln O CO LO N U') 0 a 0000 d o 0 0 0 +' NNNN � � ti 'd' dam• N N N N 00 co co 00 00OOaO L L � U -aEa-0 �cl)U� 0000 o LL. LL. LL. LL- C 0 0 0 0 U _ WWLLW c c `- O N U 0 t Y N N N O R 0 N ` N CO , ao o ti a (YnIUUUU y co m LO (D f,- (o V OO LO, V y CM co 0 (D C O O N CD m m .c Z C c a c c LO O O O O m 4" 4-- 4-- w r N ^m CL O O O F` O O W 0 M N N O co (D Z O caws �. (fl - : W .0 0 > 0. j F- Z _ .LLJ U N � U U > o X 0 z :o. LO O 5 N c? ,.y 0 LO IL .. Z O M D "O (D J U.• O O z O ¢. N ;. d Z Q J Q U cu m .D • Z:, LL m . m. j• CD Z Vi . K 'V ; O N .. O Y 'C 00 O O O ., .fl C O Q f0 U E' a U W Z' v� " --' O (0 W '0 cv U -m00 nf6 (D Uwm ao U) oN �, mN E(p . O N Z (p y O LJ U O_ C O rn _ W r LPL Q O 0);2 O czi cu ca O r-0 LU p N W Q0Q W Q.' C7 0 0 0 Z 7...ca , o = Z roil- U. m L: q- O •0 •C `n m N O)- O .> Z) Z.Z. C O -O O U U �W� w O(0 _ Q U a) T m C CIO o N O cx n. @ W c O N 0v�c Z w ) CLO 00 Z _ (C lu- O EoL :3 — U Co sl`�, T N Er__ Ef T F � L F 200109190311 09/19(2001 11:26 AM Snohomish P.0009 RECORDED County ..CITY KILL—RK X.igi 6Y1l VENUA NO. t0MQNDS, tfi/A.••980Y0 AGRE• WNT REGARDING INSTALLATION qX ,o - .OF STORIk1VVATER IMPROVEMENTS C(JVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND AL -Ze- WHEREAS, the Crty,:of Ld ibnd'i maintains stormwater management and dewatering improvements upon the propeity of Call ailil PQllyPearson ("subject site"), and WHEREAS, pursuant 18 a ..review by the City's consulting engineer, storm sewer improvements for the subject sito.h'aXe-beep• designed and would be scheduled for construction by the City during the 2001 construciion.season, and WHEREAS, the Pearson desire to install improverjgents which, by means of containing ponds, drop walls, stream beds and waterfalls, are,fnoi;e adsthetically pleasing and compatible with the landscaping of their property, and:' WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to ; coggerate in the installation of said improvements in order to achieve a level ot'final' ;design and construction which meets the standards established by the City for its stormwater�impff,<emients while meeting the aesthetic needs and desires of the Pearsons, NOW, THEREFQRI; The City of Edmonds, Washington, a mumcipa1_goif4oration'E"City") and Carl and Polly Pearson, husband and wife and owners of property situated• at t6911 751' Place West, Edmonds, Washington, (hereinafter "the Pearson') have entered ig'[o this Agreement in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived and the promises and covenintq, cohtailiati herem 1 Statement of Purpose The parties have entered i 6 this'A*' &eement in order to authorize the Pearsons to utilize a City easement for the cdnstl:dctiotf and maintenance of stormwater improvements compatible with the aesthetic and Iar dscapuig dpsigj :of the Pearsons' property, while meeting the stormwater conveyance needs of the'City gfF,dmorjds Nothing in this Agreement should be interpreted to 'find that the City has assriuled a greater duty with respect to the Pearson and any future owner of the subject site than,ig ow,.ed�to an: member of the general public The parties, in making the preceding declaratioti,; specifically rely on Washington case law such as Brown v MacPherson's, 86 Wash, 2d 295 (1'975)•......: 2 Undertakings of City 21 The City agrees to pay the sum of $30,000 to the Pearson rii cpnii i ratjon of the promises contained herem, and more particularly their promise to mAtall stoiinWittq> improvements and to maintain such improvements either personally or by their; suck s&s•'*m**- interest in ownership in the subject site Said sum shall be paid in the following mariner. ti. 1 i .. ,maintenance of the improvements, to, but only to the extent of such negligence or wrongful " toriipus`act. 34 Warrant that the improvements shall conform to minimum City standards .s'sef forth,in applicable City standards and, more specifically, to construct improvements and to maintaln szlch improvements, including the cost of repair or reconstruction to the end that stormwater 011ected from the approximately 21 5 acres of upland is conveyed through the system to''lkie''Clty'�'cf:�inage basin in a free and unfettered flow The improvements shall be designed;"mauital&cl,'constructed and reconstructed in a manner consistent with the drainage of the 21 5'4fes with a desig r'standard equal to a 100-year storm peak flow of 7 8 cubic feet per second during any f�fi 6 ty-fbur hour period The Pearsons will install an 18" pipe, designing their system'vath 41,tf$cien head and other characteristics to enter the City's 12" pipe, based on the City's representation-,t aI- As 12" pipe has sufficient head and characteristics to handle the anticipated flows; -at 0e de=b6d 35 ';Tfie �earsofis agree, on behalf of themselves, their estates, assignees and successors in interest i8--th6'h&einaiter described subject tract to maintain, repair or reconstruct such system in perpetuity; in order fo coney stormwater to the catch basin owned by the City and shown on the attached Bxh7bit D `.,Thispromfe to maintain, repair, construct and reconstruct touches and concerns the subjec#: tract and as•-su.c4 is and shall be a covenant running with the land, binding all future owners'ofthe:subledt trttef" 36 In the event,- of Jhb destruction' a the stormwater facilities constructed hereunder, or their damage beyond any reasonable repair; -•the Pearsons and their successors in interest in the subject tract, hereby covenant and agzed tQ replace such stormwater improvements in accordance with the minimum standards'*for•.such in pro•.,Vements then maintained by the City of Edmonds or otherwise confirming with the thei�--dxisting applicable law Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require such future re0acement:;..at­`the level of the original aesthetic improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement, if the cost of such aesthetic improvements exceeds the cost of minimum improVernitnts.ther "required in accordance with City construction standards and/or then existing applicable law Jzf the •event of dispute regarding the level of construction and repair required, the parties ag'ree'fa sub}7ztt their dispute to mediation by a mediator mutually agreed to between the parties and at tl#eir.r iutual cost 37 This Agreement shall be recorded iii••order.,to *- notify any future owners, mortgagors or other persons acquiring an interest m the subjecp sits= ''Try: &htion, the Pearsons and their successors in interest covenant that they shall notify future' property owners of the existence of these construction, reconstruction and maintenance restionitSil�ttes...:.. 40 Subject Site Benefited Tract The subject site, located-.1$313 75t1i'Place West, Edmonds, Washington is legally described on the attached Exhibit'A-;-`incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth Said subject site shall be considefed"to-be a benefited tract under this Agreement and the promises and covenants contained herein"touch.21J d concern the land and shall run with the ownership of the subject site in perpetuity *unfil xega"�ed or vacated by the City of Edmonds t rJ {WSS473742DOC,1/00006900000/} 3 2 V 0 0 9 � 90 3� ,�; `'......, .: 50 Entire Agreement This is the entire agreement between the parties, and any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions This Agreement ' shall n.at be amended except in writing except with the express written consent of the parties herctri_ . , ' Y4 f ' DQNE'thzs .•cZV day of 2001 j.. PROPERTY OWNERS Car Pearson i• Pkily Pe •son STATE OF WASHINGTON.)' COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) " On this -day, personally appep.red-before me CAI L PEARSON and POLLY PEARSON, husband wife, and declared that they signed tbis•1iistn merit as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO b9for-e• 'e this•' �A- day of v u) �", 2001 r .rr_F•%I '"y,P� �� �r-y� .• ►A i C tom- i Sg40N '' : ' •����•. +%� Print Name"" �O7ARy y. ��� My Commission expxFes • �-- i G} -U`j i f'USUC , '......... �� `�•' r.�9„a6. CITY OF EDMONpS By. Ma r Garyakgnson .• ` ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED. ' Sandra S Chase, City Clerk 2001091 {WSS473742 AOC,I/00006 900000/) 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM OFFICE THE IT-�'A RI . Sc�Citt $riyder `y~......... _ .. •t t � 2001U91903..1. (WSS473742 DOC,1/00006 900000/) 5 t: EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1631175th Place West Edmonds, Washington i The North 91 14 ,feet iATraot-62 &4 adowdale Beach, as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, kdc'tOS'of ,Snohomish County, Washington EXCEPT the West 10.0 'feef fhe�egf EXHIBIT,` A' ' 200iogigo:�it CL- 0 S- 200109190311 75 W— ial M E 13 03 > � � a CIA) 7s ZL 7:E (0 U� m to 200109Igo 311 ' 3 • O p O N O .:.......... LA X W ............ � •' x O d••. . f LO `0 u LA X Q� i J �='•••ter•-• i -P . � In; O U a M4-> d 20010919031 i Q! A 0 • CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-771-0221 Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Engineering Division December 17, 2009 Phyllis Lawson 16221 75th Place West Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Storm Drainage Improvements at 16311 751h Place West Ms. Lawson, GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Per your request, the City is hereby informing you that the construction of the storm improvement system at 16311 75th Place West is complete. The following is provided in response to your letter of September 30, 2009: The stormwater diversion that I believe you are referring to (the above ground piping) was a diversion put in place by Mr. Pearson to allow for the construction of the storm system improvements per the approved plans. The diversion was temporary and the above ground piping has been removed as the storm system construction is now complete. Exhibits B & C to the Stormwater Agreement and Covenant are not construction drawings. A separate civil plan was submitted by Pearson for the storm system at 16311 75th Place West. The design was completed by a firm hired by Mr. Pearson and the plans were approved by the City. The engineer of record as noted on the plans is Todd W. Perbik, P.E. of Perbix Bykonen. Review of the proposed system was completed by City staff Don F. Fiene, P.E. and Lyle Chrisman. As previously communicated and provided for in the recorded covenant, the Pearsons, their successors and assignees agree to maintain, repair or reconstruct the storm system in perpetuity in order to convey stormwater to the catch basin owned by the City (shown on Exhibit D of the agreement). City Public Works Department staff performs regular maintenance inspections of the City's storm system adjacent to Pearson's private stormwater system. Maintenance inspections are typically performed on a weekly basis which is normally sufficient to determine that Pearson's system is not causing an impact to your property. Land use action bulletins were not required by City Code for the work performed by Mr. Pearson and therefore, a sign was never posted at the site. • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan l t 0 No permits were required for the construction of the storm improvements and therefore inspections performed did not follow the typical permit process. Mr. Pearson was given authority to construct the storm improvements through the agreement between the City and Mr. Pearson, which was recorded against the property on September 19, 2001. In addition, the City approved plans for the storm system design on November 20, 2001. Please feel free to contact Jeanie McConnell at 425.771.0220, Ext. 1338 should you have any additional questions. Sincerely, imw- 4k Robert S. English, P.E. City Engineer RE/jm c: Street files: 16221 75th Place West and 16311 75t" Place West; CADocuments and Settings\cu tis\My Documents\Engsec\Lawson Response Letter.doc 11 36 RE: Storm Drainage Improvements at 16311 757' Place West 8eptember,,W-, own the property at 16221 75th Place West, sharing a common property line with the Pearson's. My family and I have concerns regarding the storm water improvements currently under construction on the Pearson's Property. The project started in 2001 and continues today, eight years laterl Nuclear }plants, hydroelectric dams, bridges take years to complete NOT storm water improvements. In a letter dated June 16, 2009, city engineer, Robert S. English wrote Carl Pearson; 'The agreement states the city had a storm water improvement design completed by a consultant and had anticipated construction of said improvements during the 2001 construction season. It stated that Carl Pearson had proposed storm improvements that were more aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the landscaping of the property. As a neighbor I was never notified of storm Improvement. The City never posted any land use action bulletins, to solicit public input. I believe the city chose a more expensive and structurally inferior, high maintenance way to transport storm water in an area the city deems high risk to land movement. The cities own temporary diversion is more typical and afar less expensive way to control storm water. This temporary diversion is less likely to fail in this sensitive area. Is the diversion permanent? Was the original plan to divert the creek into the storm water drain? How does the current diversion differ from the storm water design the city was prepared to install? (Why was the change made?) Aesthetically pleasing to whom? The storm system structure is not at all visible from any roadway or public sidewalk, architecturally pleasing yes, totally hidden from the public, far better suited for public viewing on stable footing in a park, school or beach. A taxpayer funded manmade stream buried from public view in the existing wild, steep Northwest terrain. What sort of plan review took place before approving the construction drawings exhibit B + C? As it now exits the slightest landslide, erosion of shallow pin piles, failing branches, leaves, even beavers could cause blockage or damage. Where is the structural and geotech engineering to support the integrity of this over ground system from failure to transport storm water? The failure of this high maintenance system cold damage the neighboring Lawson property now, and any future developments, in this designated critical area. Who is responsible U there are any failures to the system? Who checks the system, and how often? The City hired a consultant to design storm wager improvements in the Meadowdale Landslide Hazard area without public input. Awarded the Pearson's funds to construct a more ascetically pleasing storm water structure apparently without a deadline for completion. The perm it process, and on site inspection seem non typical for the area. The Lawson family wishes to protect the value and usefulness of their own property now and in the future. I expect a written explanation'of rrly families concerns in a reasonable 10 days. l would also like to be informed when the project is complete and has been signed off on by the City of Edmonds. Thank you. Sincerely, --­­­3� � �- C� Phyllis Lawson R ECEivim OCT 1-,*- 2009 ENG(NEERING DIYISiu.,ti CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF A PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FILE # LL-2003-121 APPLICANT Diana Clay & Michael Kerr, Carl & Polly Pearson, Andy Dulin & Linda Schoener PROPERTY LOCATION 16311 & 16319 75" Pl. W. and 7212 & 7316 1641s St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION A lot line adjustment between four lots. A. INTRODUCTION: Due to inconsistencies between surveys, there was some debate over where property lines were located between the subject properties. In an effort to resolve those issues, the property owners have gotten together and come to agreement where the property lines are. This lot line adjustment confirms that agreement. B. ANALYSIS OF DESIGN: 1. Number of Lots Involved: 4 2. Lot Area: a. Minimum lot area required for RS-20 zone: 20,000 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit b. Lot area of each lot: Proposed Complies with lot width Req Net Sq. Ft. Lot 1 (Pearson — 16319) 20,000 Yes (same) Lot 2 (Clay / Kerr property) 40,696 Yes (same) Lot 3 (Pearson — 16311) 48,892 Yes (same) Lot 4 (Dulin / Schoener property) 97,384 Yes (increased) C. Number of corner lots: N/A. d. Flag lot determination: N/A. 3. Topoeraphical Consideration: The proposed lot line adjustment does not impact the steep slopes on the west side of the properties as they are already protected through the City's Critical Areas ordinance. 4. Zoning Ordinance: The lot line adjustment meets all standards for a lot line adjustment and the requirements of the Single -Family Residential (RS-20) zoning district. 5. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 6. Encroachments: The Kerr/Clay house does encroach on the 164`s St. SW right-of-way as shown on this survey. However, the location of the right-of-way and surveys and deeds resolving its location is something that is under separate application and review. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: 1. SEPA Determination: 2. Shoreline Master Program: N/A Exempt from Shoreline Master Program. 3. Critical Area Determination: CA-95-22 & 23 and CA-97-27. The Critical Areas Determination for all of these properties require additional studies related to steep slopes. However, no Page 2 Clay Lot Line Adjustment File No. LL-03-121 specific development is proposed with the subject lot line adjustment and no critical areas study will be required with this application. D. - REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS: None E. DECISIONS: Approved with the followine conditions: 1. Submit final ROS / Boundary Line Adjustment document with all owners signatures to the City for approval signature. 2. Record the final document with the Snohomish County Auditor. Provide a copy of the recorded document to the City. F. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Boundary Line Adjustment recording documents. I have reviewed the application for lot line adjustments pursuant to Chapters 20.75 and 20.95 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. If the applicant does not file an appeal of this decision within 10 days of the date of this decisCin. this preliniinary decision shall become final. DD Division RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION A request for reconsideration or clarification of this decision may be made by filing a letter with the Planning Department within ten (10) working days of the date of decision. THE RIGHT TO APPEAL This decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. In this case, a written letter must be submitted to the Planning Department within ten (10) working days of the date of decision. Lapse of Approval This decision must be acted on within one year of the approval of the date of this report. One one year extension may be granted under the terms of ECDC section 20.75.050.F. City of Edmonds, attn.: Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 2 I fir• q I � T�, � Fq Nt_,_r--Lj A I I I I I 120 z I U I 11 s �In M"na I IN I I a� N H N I iyy I Ir N or2o w' E z 0 I N 9a c) IRE aWNAL for I $ < DIE C: m • ` n 'A a a I10178 I04.!<2 2 N o Sse �7' E 7QS9 � gl I --i mx j C7 IAII I � � 'EI I a I (i O N OS42'�Q' E I I I I m I I I I 270m N 28!'r7' E c_ a 'b I I yaor� r / ar,4*-0Y I � v ' I 120-1 co L_�) 2 � .saC) o — _ L _ . 51(C)) N 2'39k7' C(M) — -- '6Z �NQp (MSTMICE PER SP.. AF. N0. 99020MWI) 72N0 AVENUE W. N OTW.47- E ' 16311 V44 0 w na(ZIFIVr OCT 2 2 20M PERMIT COUNTER AGREEMENT REGARDING INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds maintains stonnwater management and dewatering improvements upon the property of Carl and Polly Pearson ("subject site"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to a review by the City's consulting engineer, storm sewer improvements for the subject site have been designed and would be scheduled for construction by the City during the 2001 construction season; and WHEREAS, the Pearsons desire to install improvements which, by means of containin2. ponds, drop walls, stream beds and waterfalls, are more aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the landscaping of their property; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to cooperate in the installation of said improvements in order to achieve a level of final design and construction which meets the standards established by the City for its stonnwater improvements while meeting the aesthetic needs and desires of the Pearsons, NOW, THEREFORE The City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation ("City") and Carl land Poliy Pearson, husband and wife and owners of property situated at 16311 751" Place West, Edlrionds, Washington, (hereinafter "the Pearsons") have entered into this Agreement in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived and the promises and covenants contained herein: 1. Statement of Purpose. The parties have entered into this Agreement in order to authorize the Pearsons to utilize a City easement for the construction and maintenance of stormwater improvements compatible with the aesthetic and landscaping design of the Pearsons' property, while meeting the stormwater conveyance needs of the City of .Edmonds. Nothing in this Agreement should be interpreted to find that the City has assumed a greater duty with respect to the Pearsons and any future owner of the subject site than is owed to any member of the general public. The parties, in malting the preceding declaration, specifically rely on Washington case law such as Brown v. MacPherson's, 86 Wash, 2d. 295 (1975). 2. Undertakings of City. 2.1 The City agrees to pay the sum of $30,000 to the Pearsons in consideration of the promises contained herein., and more particularly their promise to install stormwater improvements and to maintain such improvements either personally or by their successors in interest in ownership in the subject site. Said sum shall be paid in the following manner: { WSS473742.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 1 2.1.1 $5000 upon execution of this Agreement, said sum being paid in consideration of the promises contained herein and also in order to permit the Pearsons to complete design work necessary for the installation of stormwater improvements in accordance with attached Exhibits B and C, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth (hereafter "improvements"). 2.1.2 The remaining $25,000 shall be paid in two equal portions. The first portion shall be paid upon approval of a grading and/or retaining wall pen -nits necessary to authorize the construction of the improvements to proceed and the remaining one-half upon completion of the improvements and their acceptance by the City. 2.2 The City hereby waives any and all permit fees associated with the ,application, review and issuance of required grading and/or retaining wall pernits in order to authorize construction of the subject improvements. To the extent consistent with its obligations to other applicants, the City will make every reasonable effort to expedite review and approval of' the permits, including an expedited geotechnical review by a neutral third party in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter 19.05 relating to construction in earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas. 2.3 The City hereby authorizes the Pearsons, their authorized agents and assigns, and future property owners as may be necessary to fulfill the ternis and conditions of the undertaking set forth below, to enter into and utilize City easements located upon the subject site for the purpose of construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance of the stormwater improvements as shown on the attached Exhibit B and C. 3. Underlakin..,s of Pearsons. 3.1 To utilize all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement for the design and construction of the improvements as shown on the attached Exhibits B and C. The Pearsons agree to maintain adequate records regarding expenditure of such public funds and to make thein available for inspection by Washington State Auditor or any duly authorized agent of the City during normal working hours and following reasonable written notice. 3.2 Diligently pursue construction, reconstruction, completion and maintenance of the improvements. 3.3 Hold harmless and indemnify the City from any damage to the City's stormwater system caused by construction, reconstruction and/or maintenance of the improvements and to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any claim, loss or liability of negligence or intentional wrongful act of the Pearsons, their officers, agents, or employees during the design, construction, reconstruction and maintenance of the improvements, to, but only to the extent of such negligence or wrongful tortious act. The City will likewise hold harmless the Pearsons from any claim, loss or liability of any kind whether from the City or any third party for stormwater damage caused by the negligence or intentional wrongful act of the City, its officers, agents, or employees during the design, construction, reconstruction and { WSS473742.DOC;1 /00006.900000/ maintenance of the improvements, to, but only to the extent of such negligence or wrongful tortious act. 3.4 Warrant that the improvements shall conform to minimum City standards as set forth in applicable City standards and, more specifically, to construct improvements and to maintain such improvements, including the cost of repair or reconstruction to the end that stormwater collected from the approximately 21.5 acres of upland is conveyed through the system to the City's drainage basin in a free and unfettered flow. The improvements shall be designed, maintained, constructed and reconstructed in a manner consistent with the drainage of the 2.1.5 acres with a design standard equal to a 100-year storm peak flow of 7.8 cubic feet per second during any twenty-four hour period. The Pearsons will install an 18" pipe, designing their system with sufficient bread and other characteristics to enter the City's 12" pipe, based on the City's representation. that its 12" pipe has sufficient head and characteristics to handle the anticipated flows, above described. 3.5 The Pearsons agree, on behalf of themselves, their- estates, assignees and successors in interest in the hereinafter described subject tract to maintain, repair or reconstruct such system in perpetuity in order to convey storrnwater to the catch basin owned by the City and shown on the attached Exhibit D. This promise to maintain, repair, construct and reconstruct touches and concerns the subject tract and as such is and shall be a covenant running with the land, binding all .future owners of the subject tract. 3.6 In the event of the destruction of the stonnwater facilities constricted hereunder, or their damage beyond any reasonable repair, the Pearsons and their successors in interest in the subject tract, hereby covenant and agree to replace such stormwater improvements in accordance with the minimum standards for such improvements then maintained by the City of Edmonds or otherwise confirming with the then existing applicable law. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require such future replacement at the level of the original aesthetic improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement, if the cost of such aesthetic improvements exceeds the cost of minimum improvements then required in accordance with City construction standards and/or then existing applicable law. In the event of dispute regarding the level of construction and repair required, the parties agree to submit their dispute to mediation by a mediator mutually agreed to between the parties and at their mutual cost. 3.7 This Agreement shall be recorded in order to notify any future owners, mortgagors or other- persons acquiring an interest in the subject site. In addition, the Pearsons and their successors in interest covenant that they shall notify future property owners of the existence of these construction, reconstruction and maintenance responsibilities. 4.0 Subject Site: Benefited Tract. The subject site, located 16311 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington is legally described on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Said subject site shall be considered to be the benefited tract under this Agreement and the promises and covenants contained herein touch and concern the land and shall run with the ownership of the subject site in perpetuity until released or vacated by the City of Edmonds. { WSS47?742.UOC;I/00006.900000/} 3 5.0 Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties, and any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing except with the express written consent of the parties hereto. DONE this day of )2001. PROPERTY OWNERS: Car Pearson a&d P lly Pe -son STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day, personally appeared before me CARL PEARSON and POLLY PEARSON, husband wife, and declared that they signed this instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before ie this�� day of �-� v. > 2001. .•.� "N T Y , aRl BAIC/,c��t 1 2,v- D �' • 'g9101V ''•.'r Ott Print Name My Commission expires: [—.I C1 —y!�) ;0 I.IOTARy �iL1G ; ��r �'�••• 1.».p5 r CITY OF EDMONDS By: Mayor Gary Haakenson ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk (W SS473742. DOC;1 /00006.900000/) 4 APPROVED AS TOT-O..RM: OFFICE ITY'EY: az2vk . W. Scott Snyder { WSS473742. DOC; l /00006.900000/ ;EX-0-$II3IT A 'LEGAL DESCRIPTIO 1631175th Place West Edmonds, Wasbington The North 91.14 feet of Tract 62, Meadowdale Beach, as per plat recorded in Voluble 5 Of plats, page 39, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet thereof. EXHIBIT A Po LQ E ij ts) 1 421 Q)l < 7s L i v L ks) Qs � � U LL Z U- U U ® m ® a a ® Q �ii ; D -,- lu FJC iZBIT C X,D -XHIBII D 1��r lir 16so -?ST+,P(- AGREEMENT REGARDING INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds maintains stormwater management and dewatering improvements upon the property of Carl and Polly Pearson ("subject site"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to a review by the City's consulting engineer, storm sewer improvements for the subject site have been designed and would be scheduled for construction by the City during the 2001 construction season; and WHEREAS, the Pearsons desire to install improvements which, by means of containing ponds, drop walls, stream beds and waterfalls, are more aesthetically pleasing and compatible with the landscaping of their property; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to cooperate in the installation of said improvements in order to achieve a level of final design and construction which meets the standards established by the City for its stormwater improvements while meeting the aesthetic needs and desires of the Pearsons, NOW, THEREFORE The City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation ("City") and Carl and Polly Pearson, husband and wife and owners of property situated at 16311 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington, (hereinafter "the Pearsons") have entered into this Agreement in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived and the promises and covenants contained herein: 1. Statement of Purpose.. The parties have entered into this Agreement in order to authorize the Pearsons to utilize a City easement for the construction and maintenance of stormwater improvements compatible with the aesthetic and landscaping design of the Pearsons' property, while meeting the stormwater conveyance needs of the City of Edmonds. Nothing in this Agreement should be interpreted to find that the City has assumed a greater duty with respect to the Pearsons and any future owner of the subject site than is owed to any member of the general public. The parties, in making the preceding declaration, specifically rely on Washington case law such as Brown v. MacPherson's, 86 Wash, 2d. 295 (1975). 2. Undertakings of City. 2.1 The City agrees to pay the sum of $30,000 to the Pearsons in consideration of the promises contained herein, and more particularly their promise to install stormwater improvements and to maintain such improvements either personally or by their successors in interest in ownership in the subject site. Said sum shall be paid in the following manner: { WSS473742.DOC;1/00006.900000/} 2.1.1 $5000 upon execution of this Agreement, said sum being paid in consideration of the promises contained herein and also in order to permit the Pearsons to complete design work necessary for the installation of stormwater improvements in accordance with attached Exhibits B and C, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth (hereafter "improvements"). 2.1.2 The remaining $25,000 shall be paid in two equal portions. The first portion shall be paid upon approval of a grading and/or retaining wall permits necessary to authorize the construction of the improvements to proceed and the remaining one-half upon completion of the improvements and their acceptance by the City. 2.2 The City hereby waives any and all permit fees associated with the application, review and issuance of required grading and/or retaining wall permits in order to authorize construction of the subject improvements. To the extent consistent with its obligations to other applicants, the City will make every reasonable effort to expedite review and approval of the permits, including an expedited geotechnical review by a neutral third party in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter 19.05 relating to construction in earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas. 2.3 The City hereby authorizes the Pearsons, their authorized agents and assigns, and future property owners as may be necessary to fulfill the terms and conditions of the undertaking set forth below, to enter into and utilize City easements located upon the subject site for the purpose of construction, reconstruction, repair and maintenance of the stormwater improvements as shown on the attached Exhibit B and C. 3. Undertakings of Pearsons. 3.1 To utilize all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement for the design and construction of the improvements as shown on the attached Exhibits B and C. The Pearsons agree to maintain adequate records regarding expenditure of such public funds and to make them available for inspection by Washington State Auditor or any duly authorized agent of the City during normal working hours and following reasonable written notice. 3.2 Diligently pursue construction, reconstruction, completion and maintenance of the improvements. 3.3 Hold harmless and indemnify the City from any damage to the City's stormwater system caused by construction, reconstruction and/or maintenance of the improvements and to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any claim, loss or liability of negligence or intentional wrongful act of the Pearsons, their officers, agents, or employees during the design, construction, reconstruction and maintenance of the improvements, to, but only to the extent of such negligence or wrongful tortious act. The City will likewise hold harmless the Pearsons from any claim, loss or liability of any kind whether from the City or any third party for stormwater damage caused by the negligence or intentional wrongful act of the City, its officers, agents, or employees during the design, construction, reconstruction and { WSS473742.DOC;1 /00006.900000/} 2 • 0 maintenance of the improvements, to, but only to the extent of such negligence or wrongful tortious act. 3.4 Warrant that the improvements shall conform to minimum City standards as set forth in applicable City standards and, more specifically, to construct improvements and to maintain such improvements, including the cost of repair or reconstruction to the end that stormwater collected from the approximately 21.5 acres of upland is conveyed through the system to the City's drainage basin in a free and unfettered flow. The improvements shall be designed, maintained, constructed and reconstructed in a manner consistent with the drainage of the 21.5 acres with a design standard equal to a 100-year storm peak flow of 7.8 cubic feet per second during any twenty-four hour period. The Pearsons will install an 18" pipe, designing their system with sufficient head and other characteristics to enter the City's 12" pipe, based on the City's representation that its 12" pipe has sufficient head and characteristics to handle the anticipated flows, above described. 3.5 The Pearsons agree, on behalf of themselves, their estates, assignees and successors in interest in the hereinafter described subject tract to maintain, repair or reconstruct such system in perpetuity in order to convey stormwater to the catch basin owned by the City and shown on the attached Exhibit D. This promise to maintain, repair, construct and reconstruct touches and concerns the subject tract and as such is and shall be a covenant running with the land, binding all future owners of the subject tract. 3.6 In the event of the destruction of the stormwater facilities constructed hereunder, or their damage beyond any reasonable repair, the Pearsons and their successors in interest in the subject tract, hereby covenant and agree to replace such stormwater improvements in accordance with the minimum standards for such improvements then maintained by the City of Edmonds or otherwise confirming with the then existing applicable law. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require such future replacement at the level of the original aesthetic improvements constructed pursuant to this Agreement, if the cost of such aesthetic improvements exceeds the cost of minimum improvements then required in accordance with City construction standards and/or then existing applicable law. In the event of dispute regarding the level of construction and repair required, the parties agree to submit their dispute to mediation by a mediator mutually agreed to between the parties and at their mutual cost. 3.7 This Agreement shall be recorded in order to notify any future owners, mortgagors or other persons acquiring an interest in the subject site. In addition, the Pearsons and their successors in interest covenant that they shall notify future property owners of the existence of these construction, reconstruction and maintenance responsibilities. 4.0 Subject Site: Benefited Tract. The subject site, located 16311 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington is legally described on the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. Said subject site shall be considered to be the benefited tract under this Agreement and the promises and covenants contained herein touch and concern the land and shall run with the ownership of the subject site in perpetuity until released or vacated by the City of Edmonds. { WSS473742.DOC;I/00006.900000/} 3 5.0 Entire A er ement. This is the entire agreement between the parties, and any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing except with the express written consent of the parties hereto. DONE this �� day of 12001. PROPERTY OWNERS: Car Pearson P/olly Pe son STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this day, personally appeared before me CARL PEARSON and POLLY PEARSON, husband wife, and declared that they signed this instrument as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. SUBSCRIBED AND'SWORN TO before e this 0 4— day of O U Cy5 2001. �J N T Y �p Print Name .o •. i :o NOTARY m'; �i My Commission expires: // P� ,lot `�•••. 7. p5 .10, CITY OF EDMONDS By: may6r Gary VAakenson Ur ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk { WSS473742.DOC;1 /00006.900000/} 4 0 i APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE THE ITS AT RNEY: W. Scott Snyder (WSS473742.DOC;1/00006.900000/) EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 16311 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington The North 91.14 feet of Tract 62, Meadowdale Beach, as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet thereof. EXHIBIT A c� 7s 75 — z L w Irl Z CD Cn I — C 4) _ 00 O N 4-21 r- L CS Lu U O Q C6 U O m +� s u u 1L � U ! U EXHIBIT B Mumma lk��Qm 75 ks) 4-S a o 4--N s- 421 ks) >3 ts) IZ5) ks) 0 4-1 4..N S— U >) 4? -P q) 4-N f- U, LL L2 0 u 0 u 1 EXHIBIT C 0 0 0 u +> 0 -ul :p x d U 0 0- -P Ln +> d -P T E 1 L 0 0 -C +> Ln Ln d > u 0 d u u Ln Aff wo, p Ul u LA 0 4-> -P 0 u 0 u EXHIBIT D AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING AND REPAIR OF CURB WHEREAS, Carl and Polly Pearson (the "Pearsons") have subdivided certain property located at 16319 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington and known as Lot 1 of the Pearson Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the lot was encumbered by debris flows from . landslides occurring in January and March of 1997; and WHEREAS, as a part of removal of the debris flow, the City, at its own behest, and by public contract, initiated certain clean up of said lot; and WHEREAS, such work was suspended prior to completion of the contract, and WHEREAS, there has been a repair and/or replacement of a section of concrete curbing on said lot but there is yet to be accomplished the installation of landscaping on the lot designed to enhance the stability of the lot and, to the extent that landscaping may accomplish such purpose, control erosion and the lessening of danger from future earth subsidence or landslide hazard, and WHEREAS, the City's public contractor was unable to complete the work and the property owners have indicated their desire to complete such work; NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Edmonds, Washington, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter "City") and Carl and Polly Pearson, owners of certain real estate located 16319 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "Pearsons") in accordance with the promises and covenants contained herein and the mutual benefits to be derived do hereby agree as follows: 1. Undertakings of Pearsons. 1.1 The Pearsons promise to utilize the $10,000 paid pursuant to paragraph 2 below for the installation of landscaping and vegetative cover in substantially the form and described in the attached Exhibit A therein as Phase II work. 1.2 To utilize $1,090 to repair and replace damaged curbing on the subject site. 1.3 To maintain records regarding the expenditure of such funds in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and to make such records available for inspection by the Washington State Auditor or through an authorized representative of the City during normal working hours. { WSS473760.DOC;1 /00006.900000/} 2. In consideration of such promises, the City agrees to pay the sums of $10,000 for installation of landscaping and vegetative cover and $1,090, said sum being approximately equivalent to the $1,000 cost of installation of a curb and the sales tax attributable thereto. Said sums shall be paid in the following format: 2.1 $6,000 upon execution of this Agreement, and 2.2 $5,090 upon completion of the work. Work shall be deemed complete when the Pearsons notify the City Engineer of the completion of the work and the City Engineer has verified such installation by field inspectors by his authorized representative, and accepted such work in writing. Acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as a waiver of any claim which the Pearsons currently maintain against the City of Edmonds as described in Snohomish County Cause No. 99-2-05628-9. Similarly, however, the parties acknowledge that the City may claim any amounts expended hereunder as offsets to any damage alleged by the Pearsons in such lawsuit. 4. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties. Any prior understanding, written or oral, shall be deemed merged with its provisions. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing with the express written consent of the parties hereto. PEAR NS: Carl Pearson Polly Pe on CITY OF EDMONDS By: ___ /Or—� - Ma or Gary akenson Say O ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: W. Scott Snyder { WSS473760.DOC;1/00006.900000/} AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LAIoIDSCAPIZ'dC; AND REPAIR OF CURB EXHIBIT A (Phase ID Scope of `York: The restoration of the property located at 16319 75`h Place West, Edmonds, WA will include the following: 1. Removal and replacement of curb section damaged during construction. 2. Removal of debris flow that occurred drtring'the construction sequence between curb and the rockery, and replacement of the rock materials. 3. Removal of dead and failed landscaping materials from the slope placed by City' s public contractor. 4. Importing and placement of topsoil on the lower portion of the slope and adjacent to the City installed pipe. 5. Planting of landscaping materials, groundcover, plants, scrubs and trees on the lower slope to enhance stability, control erosion and 'visually screen the pipe. 6. Installation and operation of a temporary irrigation. system as necessary for the establishment of a new vegetation. 7. Restoration of additional land areas where vegetation was removed, disturbed or compacted by equipment operated by the City's public contractor. Permits., Whereas the City of Edmonds had already provided peanuts for. it's o,.vn public contractor to perform the above work, no additional permits will be required by the Pearsons or their private contractors for the above work. Completion of Work: Whereas the Pearsons have received an estimate from a private contractor in excess of S105,000 to restore hillside (approx. 8,000 sq. ft. damaged), it is understood by both the Pearsons and the City, that City's contribution of S10,000 to the restoration will repair about 10% (ten percent) of the damaged area, or 800 square feet. The placement of topsoil must begin at the bottom of the hill, and work towards the top. 'When restoration of 800 square feet has been completed, the Pearsons will notify the City Engineer. Upon acceptance by the City, the portion of the work covered under this agreement will be considered completed, and .final payment will become due within 30 days of the date of acceptance. f wwSs4e6899.00C:1/00006.050211/) ih c is 9V CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771.0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning • Building • Engineering April 9, 1999 Mr. Carl Pearson 16311 75t' Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Homeowner Insurance Coverage for Meadowdale Development BARBARAFAHEY MAYOR As you may recall, development of your home was subject to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.05.050 which regulated construction and insurance coverage requirements for all designated Meadowdale Landslide Hazard Area development. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Edmonds City Council has enacted a change which effects your homeowners policy that was required by this ordinance. If you recall you were required to post a one million dollar homeowner policy in order for your home to be granted final occupancy. Please be advised, the City Council has repealed this requirement effective April 16, 1999. In lieu of this policy the City Council will be holding future public hearings to determine alternate coverage methods to ensure that the intent of ECDC 19.05.050 are still met. Please contact the City Clerk if you are interested in attending these meetings. You may wish to consult your insurance professional to determine the proper amount of insurance coverage necessary to meet your specific needs. Since the insurance requirement is repealed the City no longer requires to be informed of your coverage or be provided with a copy of your current policy. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at 771-0220. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official ° Incorporated August 11, 1890 ° Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Ihc.1890 • CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant November 20, 1998 Carl Pearson 16311 75' Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Pearson, The drainage project for 164`� Street SW proposed in the Meadowdale Drainage Investigation Study will be taken out to bid in early 1999. As you are aware, design for the area is already essentially complete. There will be several schedules of work for various areas in Meadowdale but staff will recommend that the project at 164' Street SW be of highest priority if funds are not available for all work being bid next year. As discussed earlier, input regarding vegetation to be planted for restoration of disturbed slope areas would be welcome from the property owner. Please call Don Fiene at (425) 771-0220, Ext. 323, if you have any questions regarding the proposed work. Sincerely, James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer JCW/cmc • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • \lCn'Y2\SYS\ENGRUIM WICARLPI I.DOC ::ITY C F EDMONDS �21 Fifth Avenue North, blonds, Washington 98020 Date: November 20, 1998 Number of pages including cover skeet: 2 FAX COVER SHEET To: Carl Pearson Phone: (425) 787-3377 Fax phone: (425) 787-6900 cc: From: Jim walker C1ty Engincer Phone: (425) 771-0220 Fax phone: (425) 771-0221 Ii$1V1A-1%:Fc8= 0 Urgent CD Per your review [] Reply A$A.P Q Please comma t Letter rollowlne regari11n8 164" Street SW Drainage Improvemants ror 1999 TRANSMISSION REPORT THIS DOCUMENT (REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE) WAS SENT ** COUNT # 2 *** SEND *** NO REMOTE STATION I.D. START TIME DURATION #PAGES COMMENT 1 425 787 6900 11-20-98 11:35AM 1-29" 2 TOTAL 0:01'29" 2 XEROX TELECOPIER 7020 Ih C.1 S90 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 STH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 •FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant September 15, 1998 Carl Pearson 16311-75' Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 SUBJECT: Ike STREET SW DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (Letter Previously Mailed to Terry Olson - 08/14/98) Dear Mr. Pearson, As noted in a prior letter to the previous property owner, the scope of the proposed drainage project is as follows: - Placement of fill and rock buttress at top of slide area. - Aboveground drain line installation from the fill area to the bottom of the slope. - Underground drain line installation from the bottom of the slope to the 1641h Street SW drainage system. - Unstable tree removal in the 164`h Street right-of-way where recommended by the geotechnical engineer. - Landslide debris removal to the extent practical between the access road and 1641h Street SW. - Vegetation placement along the route of the aboveground drain line to improve slope stability. The existing RW Beck plans will be used for drainage installation and fill placement. Your participation in selection of vegetation for the slope area would be welcome. The City suggests use of the booklet "Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control Using Vegetation" prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology, as a guide for plant selection. Please call Don Fiene at (425) 771-0220, Ext. 323, if you have any questions regarding the proposed work. Sincerely, e,. I *i JAMES C. WALKER, P.E. City Engineer JCW/cmc G:\ENGRVIMMPeamn.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Inc. nc• 1g9U City Edmonds of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT .., Permit Number. Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: r r_ :;z 5& a, B. Type of Work (be specific): a1 '2 e.44 Aal`ln /;� C. Contractor: •' iFP 1f' 1- !1 W Contact: Mailing Address: Phone: State License #: Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project Q'TJtility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut LI Yes LlNo G. Size of (-ut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this applicatiO06 hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PA TCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance. with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. 1 have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: Date: (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. Fng. Div 1997 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments• Diagram (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ❑ NO 1�C. 189p CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant August 18, 1997 Carl Pearson 8227 - 229th St. S.W. Edmonds, Wa 98020 Re: Final Engineering Inspection at 16311 75th Pl. W. Dear Carl, During the final inspection of the subject address last Thursday and reinspection Friday, two punch list items remained. With regard to the removal of the ecology blocks, we will interpret the frozen fund account you and the Deans set up for final plat road paving and debris removal to include the removal and return of the blocks. As discussed between Lyle Chrisman and your contractor's foreman regarding the fire and aid address sign on Thursday, we need proof the sign has been ordered. Once that has been accomplished, the Engineering Division will sign off the permit. Please install the sign as soon as practical. If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, pv,mw C, 1�k� James C. Walker, P.E. City Engineer ALC/JCW/sf PRSON 1 O.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan Inc. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDs. WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning/Building • Parks and Recreation • Engineering • Wastewater Treatment Plant August 15, 1997 MA-a� / Carl Pearson 8227 - 229th St. S.W. Edmonds, Wa 98020 Re: Final Engineering Inspection at 16311 - 75th Pl. W. Dear Carl, It has been brought to our attention that you want a final inspection on the subject project. Before we can sign off on the permit card, the ecology blocks that your contractor removed from the City right-of-way need to be returned to the right-of-way. Once that has been accomplished, and providing all other aspects of the permit card have been signed off by the appropriate departments (i.e. water and sewer), we will conduct the final inspection and will inform the Building Division accordingly. Can you please give us a time frame when the remaining plat requirements bonded by you and the Deans will be finished? If you have any questions, please call Lyle Chrisman at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, Don Fiene, P.E. Acting City Engineer ALC/DF/sf PEARSN9.DOC Of/ W ker • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 8g0.lgy- N*O T I C f TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER PARTIAL APPROVAL Cj VIOLATION ZI CORRECTIONS REQUIRED Permit Number Owner Job Address flow(( '70"-k pL W NO PERMIT -STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES. 71 CONSTRUCTION IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT - STOP WORK. MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH APPROVED PLANS AND PERMIT OR REMOVE. STOP WORK - UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR. CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE IS STARTED; TO AVOID POSTING OF A STOP WORK ORDER, ORDER TO CORRECT, OR ABATEMENT PROCESS. JOB CARD MUST BE POSTED ON SITE AND BE VISIBLE FROM STREET. APPROVED PLANS MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE. WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED. 71 CONTACT INSPECTOR AND ARRANGE FOR APPOINTMENT. RECALL FOR INSPECTION. VeLoeAvo ewo6m fjoc� -ro CA-yA x6vi) i v. i 0%A1,U r-iO,- /ko A006-63 �;e4� e PW flfir"C-£ (,`' wgrp� 44s d) C-,AES-n bP-Cz6VMUr2) - I2I 51,1'44 �- I►1�tlVG /J 5ur� 6h �' � Cc11� �',( FUp& THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED WITHIN DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. j.FOR INSPECTIONS CALL 771-0220. 71 Building Division Planning Department `�rEngineering Department LJ Fire Department CITY OF EDMONDS ,( ' aaco""e4—.1 Inspector ^ j q 7 Date 0 L��11 �s'tvvi-�L Inl Z-aUL42 �,b61 CUJOM23 k-6i36 jl TZX-,LD J4 im = 4-140 o.:® �`►� __ Oj l514►Jt►xi �P-f �� ,rsir� orJZ� Y► �+.[.G�l�-c�-r H� IP 6A-%;k 774,x ew� Dale 1/3 �' .-s vty I i 44A-7 J fir✓ ►� • .40 4-5 e-v P*�W s alf-c cy- �� t6"5t c+ rL.,h/ .:v 4P�I vim . l"i'nol'i a }r-vvs 4 A�Ll &vr 449::;' 1kk IT4-� " z,-wx*w-6 z.,--rjc—a rw,� x) -7,r- iv-P A,;-' rf�r-- rj(L�^)-5 Slk;�? 450L-47 IV® -fir : llb-r- ier.,:a �� w9 TNT Ks pit•-� - �� LB-�e - -c' r� Aim f a C. 1S9Q City of Edmonds RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Permit Number: Issue Date: { �_ A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: B. Type of Work (be specific): C. Contractor:��—,1�_�..^ Contact: Mailing Address:' ?_rit7L Phone:„"e-P — State License #:�•,..r-�,����';,, i57 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): ' 7 4/ Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family Single Family �i Other INSPECTOR: /INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes o G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC- TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. 1 have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purpo . Signature: Date: ( ontrac or or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997 .O 890 - 194 - ANIL. City,of EdmondiM RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMrr Path Numbe,. Uwe Date: I IAZf I A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: /&3// "7941 ire. K/ • B. Type of Work (be specific): 06N0[6T' y%4J1=,1b4- r=TE�J C— PA.*0, IAdt. C. Contractor:R69 Do WaY co zpv c.., Contact: Mailing Address: Rets vs 341 py— Phone- 4W--J?14* State License #: F4000croto 0 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Fermat #(if applicable): I q(oO-711 Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):I E. 0 Commercial 0 Subdivision El City Project 0 Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) 0 Multi -Family` Single amily 0 Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: 0yes Wo G. Size of Cut: x H. Chargq_$_W APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN r and.INDEMNITY. Applicant and by his signature to this applio,41., agrees to hold the C90, of Edmonds harmless from iofuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legalproceediftgs including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting thispermit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITYPORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL REPROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call ,the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. Ihave,f,gad the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and thepink copy of thepermit will be available on i times ��nspection purposes. v f Signature. Date: I !7 (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL.BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT -ISSUANCE En& Div. 19% 0 FSt. 1890 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering October 9, 1996 Paul Bonifaci Terra and Associates 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101 Kirkland, Wa. 98034 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR Re: Carl Pearson Short Plat (S-8-87) - Work on Short Plat Requirements Beyond September 30, 1996 Dear Mr. Bonifaci, As you know, the Meadowdale Slide Ordinance limits grading operations between May 1 and September 30, 1996. According to Carl Pearson, and in a conversation with you, grading and erosion control procedures are being accomplished to complete the short plat requirements beyond the window set forth in the ordinance based on your recommendation. The work you appeared to have authorized must be limited to grading, erosion control, and completion of the plat road per the approved short plat civil drawings (Carl Pearson's Grading and Drainage Plan) dated 5/14/91. This office needs a copy of the letter you gave the owner or on -site contractor for permission to grade. In addition, we need to know what parameters you established for the contractor to work within, a time schedule for completion of the improvements, and the measures the contractor is to take to insure proper erosion control. Please provide us this information by noon October 11, 1996. If you have any questions, please call me at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, Addison L. Chrisman IV Engineering Specialist ALC/sf c: James C. Walker, City Engineer / Jeannine Graf, Building Official Carl Pearson • Incorporated August 11, I890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan a�u.wwu ..�aauvc rvYuuwuiq ru.d'A Ua1Vtu vY0.0. {ru o<�wauJ lu. LpobNulman W. 641YottoM01103 rgpi ati tlonuayUC[o00lul, IV" a."IO:W NM A • 3 REFT HLE Notice of Continuing Improvements Fe-, ;r t., EMCal6VEE�1'-i!t'\� Waoft October Sth, 1996 City of Edmonds �, ... Engineering Division 41 % 1996 Attn: Lyle Chrisman ENGINEERING 250 5th Ave N. Edmonds, ) A 98020 Project Site Address: 16311 75th Place West, Edmonds Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage Plan Approved for Construction 5/14/91 by Robert J. Albert, Engineer and by Agreement Dated 8/19194 by Paul Mar, Community Services Director I have authorized the Fred Dowdy Company, Inc. to continue the improvements that have already been approved for construction on the "Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage Plan." This includes but is not limited to, the repairing or replacement of the filter fabric fence that you have requested, as well as grading of the roadway turnaround, driveway, and grading of the general building pad area already approved on this grading plan. I have received permission to begin these improvements on Monday the Oct. 7th, 1996 by Terra Associates, Paul Bonifaci, Engineering Geologist who will be monitoring the site, and I will be forwarding a field report to your Division on a weekly basis. In the document titled "AGREEA PENT BETWEEV CARL PF4RSONAND THE CITY OF EDMOIVDS FOR THE PURPOSES OFAMENDINGAPPROVED SUBDIi7SIGN (S-8- 87)" Item #3 states: "The plan drawn by Group Four stamped 5/18/90 entitled "Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage" and accepted and approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Division on May 14, 1991, satisfies the requirements of a drainage plan as defined by ECDC 18.30.020 and as a site improvement plan as defined by ECDC 18.40.000(4). This plan is considered the Utility Development Plan. This approved Utility Development Plan is considered a condition of the subdivision and thus is exempt from the requirement of a building or grading permit according to ECDC 18.40.000(4)." rtam.l.eltreeraon ureaave rroaucttorla t-": kftoa'w"i4 v9jc*:;mwj-uaw to: Lyle l.nttaman at. tad of tamonttn rage totl wianaay,uc'tooerul, I V0 tl:6l:ou"A Y Notice Page 2 i Item # 5 states: O C T 7 1996 n ENGINEERING .....approval of work done under the utility development plan with the exception of retaining walls and rockeries is the responsibility of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division." In addition during 1996, the "Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage" plan was agreed to be exempt from a building or grading permit by the "City of Edmonds Record of Short Subdivision" which states: Item #4 "The plan drawn by Group Four stamped 5/18/90 entitled "Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage" and accepted and approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Division on May 14, 1991, satisfies the requirements of a drainage plan as defined by ECDC 18.30.020 and as a utility development plan as defined by ECDC 18.40.000(4). This plan is considered the Utility Development Plan. This approved Utility Development Plan is considered a condition of the subdivision and thus is exempt from the requirement of a building or grading permit according to ECDC 18.40.000(4)." This Record of Short Subdivision including this exemption has been: 1. Approved of the City Council of Edmonds 2. Actions by the City Council signed by the Mayor 3. Notarized 4. Recorded with Snohomish Count,,. - We have met all of the City's requirements to continue to the make improvements approved on the Grading and Drainage plan as agreed in writing, and will continue construction based on those plans and conditions. Sincerely, Carl P. Pearson 8227 229th SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Phone 206.621.0203 FAX 206.621.0211 cc: Scott Synder, City of Edmonds Attorney Paul Mar, Community Services Director Fred Dowdy, Fred Dowdy Company, Inc. CSt. 189' CITY OF-EDMONDS 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • 1206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering August 20, 1996 Mr. Carl Pearson 8227 229th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Lot 3 @ 16311 75th Place West Application #96-170 BARBARA FAHEY MAYOR The Permit Coordinator has notified you both by telephone and by faxed/mailed letter dated August 13th, 1996 that the referenced permit application is ready to be issued subject to you/owner(s) posting a $27,000 site restoration bond, completing the Covenant to Notify and Hold Harmless form and submitting your contractor's information. Once these executed forms have been submitted to the City and the contractor license verified, the permit shall be issued. The purpose of this letter is to clarify Edmonds Community Development Code Section 19.05.080 which generally limits clearing, excavation, grading, drainage and foundation installation, in the designated Meadowdale Earth Subsidence area, from September 30th to May 1 st to avoid inclement weather conditions. You are hereby officially notified that the geotechnical engineer of record, Mr. Anil Butail, P.E. of Terra Associates, shall have the responsibility to notify the City in writing when site conditions warrant a "stop work" based on ECDC 19.05.080, due to geotechnical or weather concerns. If such a professional determination is provided to the City, Mr. Butail shall then have the duty to inform the Building Official, on a weekly basis, of the improvement or further deterioration, of the geotechnical condition that first warranted the stop work opinion. The Building Official shall have the final authority on all official "Stop Work" decisions. If you or your geotechnical engineer have any questions please feel free to contact me at 771-0220. Thank you, �eannine L. Graf Building Official cc: Mr. Anil Butail, P.E. City Attorney • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan OTREETFILE MEMORANDUM Date: June 10, 1996 To: Jeannine Graf, Building Official From: Sandy Chase, City Clerk *j Subject: Limited Settlement Agreement and Release - Pearson Scott Snyder, City Attorney, asked that I provide you with a signed copy of the above - referenced agreement. The agreement is to go to the City Council for approval on June 18. However, Scott Snyder asked that the Mayor sign the agreement at this time in order to release the building permits. A signed copy of the agreement and payment of funds to the Pearsons will occur after approval by City Council. If you have any questions, you may want to call Scott. Attachment TD F/[E' 1*42AQ� ,,OIILp¢blZ✓ fo fide CirY o,✓ � 3�-F6. L�nr ivofirS�aC �e4�✓o.,i 'Y M,,/, &V F /3 I-IW- 16W-4e1W7- Ul•9s Ready fD & Isscu,/lel')UOW 10le-keol ON City of Edmonds 1. r • • 19110 I 1 �I I� 81 1D! 1' WHEREAS, Carl and Polly Pearson are the owners of certain real property located at 16311 - 75th Place W., Edmonds, Washington, which has been the subject of short subdivision and building permit applications. WHEREAS, the Pearsons have filed a claim with the City of Edmonds alleging losses associated with the processing of the subdivision and building permits by the City. WHEREAS, while both parties believe their respective positions to be correct, they desire to attempt to resolve one aspect of the dispute without compromising their respective claims, causes of action and defenses. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "City") and Carl Pearson and Polly Pearson, husband and wife (hereinafter "Property Owners") have entered into this Limited Settlement Agreement and Release under the terms and conditions set forth herein and in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived: 1. Purpose. The sole purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the processing without further fee of a building permit application for a home to be constructed at 16311 - 75th Place W., Edmonds, Washington, originally the subject of expired residential building permit Nos. 910867 and 910302, and certain limited costs associated therewith. Except to the extent specifically set forth herein, each of the parties to this Agreement reserves the rights, privileges, causes of action and defenses arising from or out of incidents relating to the subdivision of property owned by the Property Owners and associated building and conditional use permits. 2. City's Obligations. The City of Edmonds promises consideration of the mutual promises contained herein by Property Owners to: 2:1 During the 1996 building season, process without further fee or by paying the fee itself a building permit application and all associated approvals, permits or reviews to construct a single-family residence at 16311 - 75th Place W., Edmonds, Washington, substantially equivalent to the house shown on applications and permits for residential dwellings Nos. 910302 and 910867, of the records of the City of Edmonds, Washington. "Substantially equivalent" shall, for the purpose of this Agreement, mean a residential structure to be constructed within the previously approved setback adjustments, not to exceed the previously reviewed and approved square footage of the building footprint. Adjustments of building footprint and location of the structures) shall be permitted to, but only to, the extent the location ORIGINAL of proposed structure(s) is consistent with prior geotechnical review of the building footprint in the above -referenced permits. Minor structural changes, such as the reconfiguration of interior walls and space which do not require further geotechnical review pursuant to Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, shall be considered within this definition. Major structural changes, such as the reconfiguration of exterior walls or decks, or a significant reduction in total square footage of the residence may be permitted in accordance with the state building code and chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code; however, all costs associated with these specific changes shall be paid by the Property Owners. 2.2 If, but only if, the structure is required to be redesigned due to a change in the requirements of the State Building Code adopted pursuant to Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, the City will pay the limited reasonable costs associated with changes in the structure required pursuant to said changes in the State Building Code and the loss of vesting due to the expiration of prior building permits. These costs have been estimated by the Property Owners to be less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). Such reimbursable costs shall not exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) without the express written consent of the City. 2.3 The City will use its best efforts and endeavor to process the permit in a prompt and timely fashion, giving priority wherever appropriate, given its other administrative needs and work projects. The City may, at its discretion, utilize contract employees in order to expeditiously process the permits. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to provide a waiver or variance from any provision of the state building code as adopted by the City, its procedures or the provisions of chapter 19.05 ECDC. 2.4 The obligations created by this paragraph shall expire on December 31, 1996, or on the expiration of the building permit issued under paragraph 2.1 and one extension thereof, such extension being requested in a timely fashion in accordance with the provisions of the State Building Code. 3. The Property Owners agree and promise as follows: 3.1 To promptly provide any and all information and signatures necessary to process the permits and any related approvals and to fully comply with the provisions of the state building code as adopted and amended by Title 19 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. By way of illustration and not limitation, limitations on construction during the period from October tp April of each year or in other identified periods of potential earth subsidence or landslide hazard shall be observed. 3.2 To pay any and all costs from architect(s)' and/or engineer(s)' costs associated with changes in the structure not occasioned by or required due to changes in the State Building Code as described in paragraph 2.2 above. 2 0 • 3.3 To waive and release the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any claim or cost associated with, but only with, the expiration of permit Nos. 910302 and 910867. This Release is limited and intended to preserve to the Property Owners claims or causes of action set forth in their claim form filed with the City on March 22, 1996, releasing only those costs or damages shown in the claim as relating to residents' permits, plans and costs, totaled at a value of $37,949. Continuing delay costs, if any, associated with construction of the home after the date of this Agreement are reserved by the Property Owners. 4. Invalidity. In the event that any provision of this Agreement should be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall be preserved to the extent consistent with the laws of the State of Washington. 5. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement between the parties. Any understanding, written or oral, which preceded this Agreement shall be merged with, and eliminated by the provisions of this Limited Settlement Agreement and Release. THIS AGREEMENT shall not be amended except in writing by the express written consent of the parties hereto. EXECUTED THIS day of :SUN E , 1996. Approved as to form: W. Scott Sny , luty Attorney Carl Pearson v CITY OF EDMONDS: By: Its: mayor • • State of Washington County of siwhani,sh I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that C9RL * PIDA-kY Pe SoN are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. i (S9AL OR STAMP) WSS129762.2AGR/0006.150.135 9 ..I �rAtiY Title My appointment expires // 9 fjl/11I19%6 iLi.br' 21PibtI102-66 C1 I Y CLLVK CUP/ES Cify of Edmonds Clam for Damages Fam AD of SERY. A-rnxNEY L MqR PAGE 02 RECEIVED MAR 2 z 1996 Please take note that C. ftj 4 F EDMONDS CITY CLERK who resides at `6 7 - — _ _ Z S L✓ mailing address 11 It r residence address for six (6) months Prior W date of this claim •, �' looms phone * -77 5 - 00�(e , wc* Phone# 6 Z l - 0203 claims damages of and from the City Of EdMOWS in the sum ot: `& 2,3 3ANn. C U 2 P-NT f lof{T►tY ExPe4spS .$4 tO..LtSE. This Gaim for damages arises out of the following circumstances listed below. BUtLotme Date of occurrence: _ 1 �{ i I i l F�� E►JT Time: ilmcbtba of Occurrence: _ � �O3xx 75'-r4 t. E test, A>+� Cir-e o f -yrf or+� OESCI11PTIQN: Describe occurrence eViaWng the nature of the defeas. or acts of negfegence causing damages. (attach est extra-slheet for addlikeal InI mttalfart If needeM 2 PrrOvide a Fst of witnesses, if applicable, to the oc currmce indtAng names, addresses, and phone numbers. S'EC RTTPCt4 fQj AMD A%U-E . .A ruzacn cafes Of all Oocunvwdation relating to expense$, irpuries, losses, and/or estimates for "Additional k0offmWon Required forAcdomodire Claims Only" License Pima # Driver License * Type Aura (heal _ _ (Make) (Model) Driver: Address: Phone: Passengers: Address Owner's Insurance Co.: Address: Phone: Address: Policy Number, Have you submitted a claim ice damages to ywr insurance ownpW Yes Na ** Note: This form must be sfgned and nalwlred a* being first duty sworn, depose and say that i am the Ga nvua for above described; that I have mad tits abo�Tcnowclaim,Tnow the contents thereof and believe the to State of Washington County of t �i ,nnC ( 1S �$ Signature Subscribedand rn to before me thiso� itay of j' / ( (e crmdmgtm.doc 12126M r Public and aloo Washrngton JAN-17-1996 11 57 2067710266 \� P.02 9 • Damage Valuation Damage Issues and Methods of Valuation between Carl Pearson and City of Edmonds History: Recording of Sub -Division In Dec. 1989, Cad & Polly Pearson purchased 2 vacant lots located at 163xx 75th Place West, Edmonds, that had been approved (but not yet recorded) for a Short Subdivision into 3 lots. Under the direction of the City of Edmonds, Associate City Planner, Leigh Francis, all of the requirements of the Short Subdivision were satisfied and the Subdivision was recorded on March 22, 1990. Permits Also, on March 13th, 1990 design & engineering work begin on the site improvements and the application for Permit #910302 was submitted on July 26th, 1990, and finally approved by the City on April 22, 1991. (Approval time 9 months). On May 31, 1991 plans were submitted for residential building Permit #910867 and that permit was issued on Oct. 21st, 1991 by Richard Mumma, City of Edmonds Building Official, subject to an approved sequence of construction related to Permit #910302, and the agreement that the one year time of the permit would not be started until the construction sequence allowed for the actual construction to take place. (Approval time 5 months) On Oct. 21st, 1991 while picking up the residential building permit, I was informed that I also needed another Conditional Use Permit #CU-74-91 for the residence. I applied for that permit on Oct. 21 st, 1991 and paid the $85.00 fee and obtained a receipt #14963. The Conditional. Use Permit was approved June 22, 1993. (Approval time 21 months) The total time waiting for the above permits was 35 months, or 2 years and 11 months. Stop Work Ordered On Dec. 19th, 1991, Mr. Richard Mumma, City Building Official, issued a written Stop Work Order on building permit #910302 (work on permit #910867 had not yet been allowed to begin). This Stop Work Order was to remain effective until further notice." The reason stated in the notice was due to "weather." This action was taken without consulting the Geotech Engineer (Tetra & Associates) who is given the authority and responsibility to monitor site construction under ECDC 19.05.100. The action was also done without consulting the Owners (Carl & Polly Pearson), or the contractor. Extensive testimony was given at Public Hearings by • Damage Valuation - Page 2 • Carl Pearson regarding how this action appears to exceed both the authority and expertise of the City of Edmonds Building Official. City Posts "Non -Compliance Notice" on FOR SALE Sign: March 8th, 1993, without prior communication with the owners (Carl & Polly Pearson), the City Engineer posts a notice of "Non -Compliance with shortplat conditions for approvar and a requirement to "inform any prospective buyer of the property, as well as real estate agents, brokers and involved mortgagors, that the property is not "buildable" and no permits will be issued until the conditions of the plat are met. The notice posted on your property shall remain in place until all subdivision conditions and requirements are complete." Carl Pearson has provided testimony at public hearings regarding reckless and illegal manner that this notice was placed on a private FOR SALE sign. The due process for review as required by ECDC 20.100.040 was not done. This posting has interfered and damaged business relationships and opportunities to sell the property. Although at future public hearings, Carl & Polly Pearson were able to provide evidence to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner agreed in his decision that the lots were in fact in -compliance with the short plat conditions, the City of Edmonds has failed to removed this notice from the site, and issue a retraction letter as requested in writing by Carl & Polly Pearson. City Seeks to Void Short Subdivision without Due Process: The City of Edmonds schedules a Public Hearing on April 23rd, 1993 to Void the Short Subdivision of Carl & Polly Pearson. This is done without following the due process as required by ECDC 20.100.040 Access to Public Records and Information Denied: In preparation for this Public Hearing, Carl Pearson requests a copy of the site inspection report and specific "alleged deficiencies" that the City claims to be in "non-compliance". In a written response on April 20th, 1993 the City refused to provided any more information, or respond to -any questions until after the Public Hearing. This denial to provide relevant records and materials requested in preparation for the hearing is a violation of Federal Freedom of Information Act as well as local codes. Right to Record Public Hearing Denied., On April 23rd, 1993, Carl Pearson was denied the right to make his own audio tape recording of the Public Hearing being brought against Carl & Polly Pearson to void the short plat The City of Edmonds insisted that it alone had the right to make such recordings, and Carl Pearson was made to put away a audio cassette recorder. Damage Valuation - Page 3 0 Hearing to Void Short Plat - April 23rd & 27th, 1993: The City of Edmonds was represented by John Bissell of the Planning Dept., and Public Hearing was done before John Bissell, who was also acting as the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's Decision was also written by John Bissell and concluded that Mr. Bissell agreed with himself and not Carl & Polly Pearson. Hearing Examiner's (STAFF) Decision Appealed - July 1st & 8th, 1993: Before City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner, Jim Driscoll, extensive evidence was presented by Carl Pearson and the Examiner suggested that a meeting be held with all concerned parties, and report back to him. Such a meeting was held on July 6th, at 2:00 p.m. where various issues were talked about and reported to the Examiner on July 8th. Hearing Examiner Driscoll Overturns City's Attempt to Void Short Plat: Based on the evidence presented, the Hearing Examiner Driscoll concluded in his findings that the City could not Void the Shortdivision, and granted to Carl & Polly Pearson modification of setbacks, and extensions of time allowed on all building permits. This is found in File: AP-93-110 and is the basis of the action before the City Council today. This was agreed to by the City of Edmonds, Community Services Director, and the City Attorney, and explained in the History and Summary Statement of the Agenda Memo provided to you dated Jan. 16th, 1995 for the meeting scheduled Jan. 16th, 1996. City Again Seeks to Void Short Subdivision at Hearing - June 16th, 1994 Once again without the due process as required by ECDC 20.100.040, the City of Edmonds schedules another Public Hearing before Hearing Examiner Jim Driscoll in another attempt to Void the Short Subdivision of Carl & Polly Pearson. City Destroys or Loses Public Hearing Evidence: The City of Edmonds claims to have "lost or destroyed" the audio recordings of the Public Hearings from March 17th, 1989 at 10:30 am and from Public Hearing April 27th, 1993 at 8:00 am. Under the ECDC 20.90.020 Section H Records, it states: The City Clerk shall keep a permanent record of all public hearings held under the Community Development Code. Summary minutes and a tape recording of the hearings shall be sufficient record. These tapes contained important information relating directly to the requirements of the original sub -division approval, and the City's attempt to Void the Short Plat. The City has not been able to locate these tapes during the last 18 months, Damage Valuation - Page 4 0 and in addition to failing it's legal obligation to produce these records of Public Hearings, it has unfairly increased the burden and cost of defense for. Carl & Polly Pearson. This has resulted in loss of income for Cad Pearson from his business Creative Productions. Confidential Information Told to Prospective Buyers & Agents: Building Department personnel made improper statements concerning non - written and non-public information that was based on personal opinions, and "inside" information of what the City was going to do to Void the Short Subdivision, and what they expected the outcome of the Public Hearing to be. These damaging statements were made to prospective buyers and agents inquiring about the status of the property. False Information Given to Prospective Buyers & Agents: Wrong factual information regarding the setbacks and other information regarding the status of the property has been by the City of Edmonds to prospective buyers & agents. (A General Information summary sheet prepared jointly by the City of Edmonds and Carl Pearson was prepared per agreement item #2, and although submitted on Jan. 27th, 1995 has yet to be signed by the City.) This information summary was to be used to avoid the use of personal opinions, or false reports, or interpretations of decisions. Site Inspection Reports Falsified: Evidence was presented during the hearing of June 16th, 1994 that "Site Inspection" reports were the basis of the City's actions, never existed in a written form, that there was a great discrepancy as to the actual dates that the site inspections took place, as well as the lack of proper measuring tools, systems, and documentation, and that they were not performed by Geotechs, or other professionally trained personnel. City's Actions called OUTRAGEOUS by Hearing Examiner! Upon hearing additional testimony presented by Cad Pearson of June 16th, 1994, the Hearing Examiner called the actions of the City of Edmonds "Outrageous" and suggested that it that in the best interest of the City of Edmonds to come to an agreement with Carl Pearson so that these issues would not have to be dealt with in a court of law. City Negotiates Agreement with Carl Pearson: The agreement marked Exhibit 1 is the result of the negotiations suggested by Hearing Examiner Jim Driscoll. Damage Valuation - Page 5 Hearing Continued - July 7th, 1994 The "Agreement" was presented to the Hearing Examiner along with additional materials. City's Petition to Void Short Plan Again Dismissed - July 19th, 1994 In the Hearing Examiners Decision of July 19th, 1994 he order that the terms of the agreement be written and binding on both parties. Final Recording Documents Submitted to Planning - Oct 22nd, 1994 On Sept. 15th, 1994 a final plot map was re -signed and submitted to the City of Edmonds, and on Oct. 22nd, 1994 the final Record of ShortSubdivision was signed and submitted to the Planning Department. Planning Submits Documents to City Council - Jan. 16th, 1996 Documents to re-record the short plat were submitted to the Edmonds City Council for review and action. City Council Voids Agreement with Carl Pearson: - Feb. 6th, 1996: The agreement marked Exhibit 1 which was produced as a result of the negotiations suggested by Hearing Examiner Jim Driscoll and signed by both Carl Pearson and the Community Services Director, Paul Mar on 8/19/94 was voided by the Edmonds City Council, while the re -recorded of the short plat was approved for recording. Economic Basis of Valuation Relocation of Storm System: A storm system pipe was installed on Lot #3 by the City of Edmonds, under the LID 210 project. As part of the review of the plans for the Pearson residence, it was discovered that the placement of the sewer pipe by the City of Edmonds was running through the building pad area for the homesite. The City of Edmonds required that the sewer pipe be removed and replaced by a new pipe that was properly located along the property line and not closer then 5 feet from the building pad. Upon further investigation, it was discovered that the sewer pipe installed by the City of Edmonds was done so without properly approved plans, surveys, standard construction methods, and professional surveys for the as-builts. The valuation shown for this is the actual cash expense to have the, corrective action tacken and pipe relocated to its current and proper location. This work was completed by Mosbrucker Excavation, Inc. • Damage Valuation - Page 6 • Interest and Holding Cost of Land: This amount is based on the assessed tax value of lots made by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office. The value for Lot #1 is $220,000 and Lots #2 & #3 are at $225,000. The rate of interest and holding cost used is 12%. Property Tax. - The actual cost of the taxes paid to Snohomish County during the period of the delays caused by the City of Edmonds. Loss of Income: Due to the attempts of the City of Edmonds to "Void the Short Plat" through the use of three Public Hearings held without the due review process required, the refusal of the City to make available requested information prior to the Public Hearings, and loss or destruction of evidence in the form d audio tape recordings, and minutes of Public Hearings that are required to be preserved by the City Clerk, the burden of preparation was greatly increased to the extent that time had to be taken away from work by Carl Pearson. Since Carl Pearson is self-employed through Creative Productions, and has no employees, time spent absent from the business creates a significant economic hardship. The valuation of this time represents the loss of income that Carl Pearson would have maintained through this period without interruption. Increased Cost of Construction: This amount is based on the 1991 cost of construction for the Pearson residence on Lot #3 which at the time was $740,000.00 not including Washington State Sales tax. An increase of 6% has been used on an annual basis to reflect the current cost of construction in 1996. Interest Expense on Costs: This amount is figured on Taxes, Loss of Income, LID 210 corrections, and the previous expense interest. Not included is this amount is Cost of Construction, or Interest and Holding Costs of the Land. An interest rate of 12% has been used on an annual basis. Current Estimated Monthly Damage Expenses: This amount is a prorated estimate for each additional month of delay. Submitted by: Carl & Polly Pearson 8227 229th S.W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Home:775-0086 Office:621-0203 Fax:621-0211 Damage Valuation Carl & Polly Pearson from May 1991 to March 1996 Date Description Costs Lot #1 Lot #2 Lot #3 Jun 91 Relocated/Replaced LID 210 sewer $16,500 1992 Interest & Holding Cost of Land $26,400 $27,000 $27,000 Snohomish County Taxes $2,144 $2,193 $2,193 Interest on 1991 Expenses $1,980 Increased Cost of Construction $44,400 1993 Interest & Holding Cost of Land $26,400 $27,000 $27,000 Snohomish County Taxes $2,449 $2,505 $2,505 Public Hearing #1 - Loss of Income $8,500 Public Hearing #2 - Loss of Income $10,500 Interest on 1992 Expenses $3,001 Increased Cost of Construction $47,064 1994 Interest & Holding Cost of Land $26.400 . $22,500 $27,000 Snohomish County Taxes .. $2,481 $2,114 $2,537 Public Hearing #3 - Loss of Income $9,000 Interest on 1993 Expenses $6,536 Increased Cost of Construction $49,888 1995 Interest & Holding Cost of Land $26,400 $27,000 Snohomish County Taxes $2,549 $2,607 Interest on 1994 Expenses $9,257 Increased Cost of Construction $52,881 1996 Jan. 1 st to Mar. 31 st Interest & Holding Cost of Land $6,600 $6,750 Snohomish County Taxes $637 $652 Interest on 1995 Expenses $2,747 Increased Cost of Construction $14,013 Sub -Totals $276,267 $122,460 $83,312 $125,244 Total Project Delay Costs to 3/31196 $607,284 Estimated April 1996 Costs $10,456 Residence Permits & Plans Cost Carl & Polly Pearson City of Edmonds Fees Paid: 3/90 Recording Sub -Division Fees $36 4/90 Conditional Use Plan Fee $80 5/90 Conditional Use Permit Fee $250 4/91 Grading Review Fee $745 5/91 Grading Permit Fee $2,397 City Site Permits & Fees $3,508 6/3/91 Plan Check Fee #383 $1,163 0/21/91 Residence Construction Permit $3,127 0/21/91 Right -of -Way Construction Permit $30 0/21/91 Conditional Use Permit $85 , City Permits for Residence $4,405 Total City of Edmonds Fees Paid $7,913 Plan Costs Design & Structural Fees $23,406 GeoTech Fees $2,061 Engineering Fees $4,569 Total Residential Plans Design $30,036 Total Fees & Plans $37,949 0 0 I I (0 a) CF) T- LO 0') 0' T— Cl) :' 0)0se C L- 0) 0 — r 0 Ei5 0 4-0 -- 0.r> c a) c 0 0 Z CU 0 0 0 < Q- 0 CL (D -1-� 3: U) C) 1 AGREEMENT UETWEEN CARL PEARSOtV AND'IAGREEMENTHE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF AMENDING APPROVED SUBDIVISION (5-8-87) 1. '17+e final short plat is to be approval by fix; City (,ouncil as required by section 20.75.155(C). 2. A III(;et status shejoirtl-v p1e1131ed by cite property owner and the City inay be. acicted to Ilse applicable tiles (S- k-97-,AI-93-I10;P1-94-105). 3_ -11x. plan dnnvn by Gsuup lour stamped 5118M euiitled "Cart Pearson Grading and Drainage' and acu-jited and approved by the City of Edmonds ]engineering L)rvision on May 14, t991, satisfies the t»quirt inents of a drainage plan as defined by ECDC 18.30.020 and as a site intproventent phut its &dined by;ECQC t b.d0.0U0(4). ?his Pfau is musidrxed the Utiiih' Development Plan. This approved U ility Development Plan is considered a condition of the subdivision and thus is exempt from the requirement of a building or Rraditrg permit according to BCDC 18.40.000(4): 1 4. Alt improvetuents shotvrt on the approved Utility Dcvcloputeul plan must be conipicte prior o the isswu= of :tjty hermits for lots 1, 2. or 3. except those already issued prior to July 1, 1995, and those to complete improvements required by the approved utility development plan. Titcnefote tlteselinipmvenieins are considered defenrd subeivisi ut recluitcntcnts 5. Under Code and Policy at the date of this agreement, approval of -,ti,osic dour under the utili development plan %vith the icx=ption of rBtaiaiag waits and rockeries is the responsibility of the City of Ed ds Engineering Divisioa. All work shall be conducted under the super ision of a litxnised geotechnical cngi}teer. Said estgin=s sltsll pnwide inspection reports to the Engineering Division. Retaining walls = radteries included in the approved utility developou-A plan for the purposes ofroad and subdivsion drainage tall not be the responsibility of the Enginee do Division and arc to be iu%Wcd by a licensed geotechnica engineer and a lictnsvd civil engineer. Said engineers shall provide inspection reports to the Planning D' The• property tnvner shall be notified in the event that the responsibility within the City changes 6. 7.�e property owner sGalt proAde the City with die final plat documents within 30 days of flit issuance of the rcz:outmend3tioa of tine Hearing Examiner to the City Council- Final plat documents include cite attiched_ reuonii ng cover sheet. and all exhibits refernd to by said recording ao►�er sheet The properly owner's allot MY sh t1l provide a Dopy of Exhibit D to the City Attorney x0thin 30 days of the date of tltc hear ig eaarnincr'a IcootnnIcadatiott_ Dates set are nullified upon appal and shall be ro-set nfier any appeal hearings. 7. 1'!ce City tv.ill u bedule the Finial Shull Plat for City Council review within 30 Qiys of the dale the documenu are rcacivcd from else property WWI`. j $. 17ic Final flat documents shall be recorded Mthin 30 days oftlie date of approval by the C+Council_ 9. 77tc property onncr sl-Lill provide the City with a stew rifle report (plan rxrtificate). The "title report must be prepared no more than 30 days prior to the rnoordittg date. 10. Tltis agreement and Hearing Exaiuiner'$ Recision is to supnsede the Hearing E-mininer's reeomrne ndation to ti.te City Coutx a of July 15, 1993 c=pt the portion of the decision granting approval of the�imodirrtation of setftacks and lot Nvidth and title extenstows of building permit aurabers 910867 and 910302.E The tuidrasigued hereby agree that t1m enuditious listed above constitute an agreement for the pies of inctn+ciing the tic;aring Exantitier to .emend the approved short plat known as S-8-37. i ll Paul Mil., Date Carl Pearson 03ft Community Services Ditcelor Property Owner JFIN -1c-j9_t; 06 ? rr 1 02- Exhibit I P . C16 (31 GROUP FOUR, Inc. 16030 Juanita -Woodinville Way N.E. Bothell, Washington 98011 FAX (206) 362-3819 (206) 775-4581 ® (206) 362-4244 July 25,1990 Mr. Robert J. Alberts, P.E./City Engineer City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Carl Pearson Residence City File #S887 GROUP FOUR, INC. Job #90-4506 Dear Mr. Alberts: KZCZ'Ve:0 JUL 3 0 1990 Fn�rlsrfil`q(�t,, Per request from Mr. Gordon Hyde, this letter serves as a request to waiver the limited driveway slope requirements of 12% to allow a slope of 15% for this particular project. The current topography of the site dictates the grading which must take place to construct the roadway. Utilizing a maximum slope of 15% will minimize the amount of rockery wall which must be constructed to protect exposed excavation. Sufficient landing has been provided at the intersection of the driveway and 75th Place West to allow cars a place to stop and check oncoming traffic before proceeding. The proposed driveway has been shifted north to minimize disturbance to an existing storm system constructed in the unopened R/W of 164th St. by the city in 1985. I trust this letter satisfies the waiver request requirements. A copy of the driveway plan and profile is attached for your use. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, GROUP FOUR, INC. 0mond. Miller, P.E. Engineering Vice -President cc: Carl Pearson .2-11-hl W4ltse/ /t/'9 AA c� d/�/,✓ Z16ed SURVEYING ENGINEERING PLANNING MANAGEMENT �^' ON NOISIA'asns H03HO N011dl83S3U 1b�31 b ZZ ' � ldb/311115 j J L,_, Z /SS3HOOb V21S-- �a� JNIIIVW m 70 9or ll38Wl1N :> ;.. 0 r„: :' x` �-• ^-_ �;.:. SS3N)sn8 3bN/3yN 83NOl/WWMO3NOZ 111Wa�d NO1Ma1SN00ONOWa3 _jo 4dV - t t Co�alrstaKs - o wAOCAt . all 04, N � • '•-si�'«�'�l:►��c�ia✓ �l�� vtf� ov -. i ��44J o oA7,45— . h-tis _ gIC18w� CoAO1rW1 O ; • -�` ��:��� 1'=- '�; �._ • -,l %plc; �=��,N;y��. -_. t .>:;•�; ->,..,.� ��: �'� ... � �� tom:. ��' • 01/11/91 10:26 0 g 206 632 2028 GENESIS ONE 0 01 O fleN 11.0. Box 70525 201 Northwest 3oth Scree: Saattla, WA 0AM7 (206)632.2303 fAX (Poo) ca7-?028 ,fanuary 11, 1991 City of Edmonds Lyle Chrisman Engineering 250 5th Ave Borth Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Grading Permit — TRUCK ROUTE PLAIT I am submitting a Truck Route Plan as requested for your files. From the oontruotion site, trucks will travel South on 75th Pl. W. to 196th St. SW or Highway 104 (Edmonds Way). It is my understanding that this is well complete ell the requirements in order to obtain this grading permit. If there is anything else that is holding this up, please contact me imediately by phone or voice mail at; Office or voice Hall: 632-236 3 Fax 632 -2028 Horse in Edmonds 775-0086 Thank you for following through on this permit. Submitted by, /� Carl P. Pearson AtBoo0teO wflh 1 no HERO Group RLQ9lvau JAN i i n9i Rucalvigu JAN i ® i9q ,i71 �1 `t.a,ll3 HLE CITY OF EDMONDS LARRYS. NAUGHTEN 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-3202 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: PETER E. HAHN Public Wor!cs • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering DIRECTOR 8g0_lg y - December 19, 1991 Mr. Carl Pearson 8227 229th Street SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Re: 16311 75th Place W. Mr. Pearson: Lyle Chrisman and I have talked.about the weather conditions and both agree that the time has come for us to stop all work on your development at 16311 75th Place W. until further notice. Please contact me at 771-3202 if you have any questions. r Si nc- y, t , Richard R. Mumma Building Official RRR:sfn PEARSON/TXTDOS62 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan MITIGATED FILE# N/A DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE 0 Description of proposal New Single Family Residence Proponent Carl & Poly Pearson 8227 229th St. S.W., Edmonds, WA 98026 Location of proposal, including street address, if any 16311 75th P1. W.,. Edmonds, WA 98026 Lead Agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. x This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by July 10,1991 Responsible Official John Bissell Position/Title Code Enforcement Tech. Phone 771-3202 Address 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds WA 98020 Date June 25, 1991 Signature��� X You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 p.m., July 20, 1991 by filing a written appeal citing reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact John Bissell to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. There is no agency appeal. • 0 CONDITIONS OF MITIGATION Carl & Polly Pearson BUILDING PERMIT, PLAN CHECK # 383 This determination of nonsignificance is subject to the following conditions: 1. All excavation and grading shall comply with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code, 1989 edition. 2. The Applicant shall obtain a building permit from the Building Department and shall comply with all conditions of permit approval. 3. The applicant shall follow the requirements and guidelines of the City of Edmonds'Engineering Division. 4. The applicant shall follow all requirements and recommendations of Terra Associates, Inc, geotectnical engineering consultants, as stated in their project number T-335, reports dated August 19, 1987 and May 24, 1991. 5. The Applicant shall make every reasonable effort to keep exposed soil covered during construction. 6. The Applicant is to make every possible effort to keep dust controlled and to keep the streets clear of dirt and debris. 7. The applicant is to hydroseed all exposed soil prior to completion of the final inspection. hNyiRoNMENTAL CEiECMST FORM FILE NO: FEE: RECEIPT NO: Purpose of Checklist: The State Errvirormiental Policy.Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C.RCW, requires all goverrmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the envirormmexrtal impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information ]mown, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions fram your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do'not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Ccuplete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays latex. Some questions ask about gavermiental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonprojec. proposals: Ccuplete this checklist for nonprojec. proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, ccuplete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPRO= ACTIONS (Part D) . For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal" "proposer'", and "affected geographic area", respectively. MAY I 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Carl Pearson 2. Name of applicant: Carl Pearson 01i -Lu - '10. 3. address and phone nuMx pplicant and contact persorj Box 70525, 201 NW 36tti St., Seattle WA 98u7 Ray Miller/Group Four, Inc., 16030 Juanita -Wood- inville WY NE, Bothell WA 98011 362-4244 4. Date checklist prepared: 5/16/90 5. Agency requesting checklist: ENVIROMUNI'AL REVIEW CDM4I!= 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction proposed to start in Summer, 1990 su ect to the approval process. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes explain. One of three lots shall be developed at this time. Two renkining lots developed in the future. 8. List any envirormiental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A soils report_bv Term Associates has been prepared for the nroner 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes explain. None known at this time. 10. List any goverrment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Road, storm and utilities design approvals; clearing and gra- ding permits; and building permits. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The propsoed development is a 3 lot single family residence plat contained on 2.6 acres. 1 12. location of the propo- ive sufficient information( Werson to understand the precise locatiorTof your proposed project, inc-Luding a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if ]mown. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject property is lots 62 and 63 in the plat of Meadowdale Beach, located northeast of the 164th Street and 75th Place West intersection (Sec. 5, Wp 27 Rge 4). i c� •• i- �� : • !J - v ORS -=mi l EVAIUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 60 per- cent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Based on the Terra and Associates soils report of August 19. 1990, Silty Sant, Clayey Silt, Minor Gravel and occasional buried trees and brush exist on the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the inm x iate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, the site is located within a hazardous landslide area. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Road and building sites would be cleared graded and compacted as necessary to achieve proper grade transition drainage and structural stability. Unsuitable material shall be exported; structural fill shall be imported as necessary for building con- struction. 2 TO BE DOMPLE= BY APPLICAI � 1 'OEVAIUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY f. Could erosion eoc,-ur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. During construction, the potential for increased erosion would be present. Following construction, erosion potential would decrease when drainage is controlled and cleared areas are re- vectetated. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings) ? Upon completion approximately 19% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary measures to control erosion could include sedimentation ponds, filter fences and diversion swales; permanent measures could include landscaping piping and armoring of outfall areas. 2. Air a. Miat types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is ecupleted? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if ]mown. During construction activities there would be increased exhaust and dust particle emissions to the ambient air. Obiectionable odors could be caused by the roofing of homes or the paving of streets. After construction the principal source of pollution would be exhaust from vehicular traffic. The increase in auto- mobiles associated with the develomient would contribute 00, NO and So„ emissions to the ambient air. Fireplaces installed in homes would contribute smoke to the ambient air. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so generally describe. Vehicular emissions from traffic on nearby roadways would be the�rimary off -site source of air pollution that could affect the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Should construction activities be under- taken during the dry season, periodic watering, if deemed neces- sary, could be used to control dust. Automobile emissions should be negligible because of the standards regulated by the Washington State Department of Licensing. 3 TO BE COMP7U= BY APPLICAI ( . EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, a seasonal drainage course exists near the north property line. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed frcm surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawls or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste material to surface waters? Post -development storm -water runoff containing some pollutants (primarily oil and debris washed from the road system), along with water-soluble household products, would be collected by the storm drainage system. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will be withdraw) at the toe of slope in an attempt to reduce soil saturation and Possible slumps/slides. 4 TO BE - OOMPLk:I'ED BY APPLICAJ� I . EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ....; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the. number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) , or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. the project would be on sewers, therefore there would be no maior sources of waste material which could be discharged to the gram -id. c. Water R4uhoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if lax w ). Where will this water flaw? Will this water flow into other waters? If so; describe. Through the con- struction of residences and roadways, the existiahg runoff rat - tern would be locally modified. Runoff from the proposal would be generated by building roofs, driveways, sidewalks and road- ways. This water would be collected by the storm drainage sys- tem and directed to storm retention/detention facilities. Ground water will be -collected through an interceptor trench system and conveyed downstream. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Refer'to Surface Water response #6 and Ground Water response #2. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Terporary erosion control devices would be installed duHng_oonstruction. After construction. storm -water runoff will be collected and directed to detention/ retention facilities by the storm drainage system. 4. Plants X deciduous tree: evergreen tree: X shrubs grass _pasture crop or grain wet soil plants; cabbage, other alder, maple, aspen, other fir, cedar, pine, other cattail, buttercup, bullrush, shank water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existinct vegetation will be removed as necessary for the roads and building pads. 5 TO BE•COMPLETED BY APPLICAK • ( OEVAILUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. List threatened -or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Development would reduce existing vegetation, although as much native vegetation as practical would be retained during con- struction. Cleared and graded areas would be revegetated with some native species and species comwn to urban areas. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and an mals.which have been observed on or near the site or are ]mown to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, soncib , other ............ mammnal.s: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other small mampals... fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ... b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas would be the primary sources of energy for the proposal and would be used for heating, li hq_t_iM and other miscellaneous household puruoses. Wood burning and passive solar gain would be secondary sources of heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. 19 TO BE•COMPLh= BY APPLICAi •EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy isipacts, if any: The inclusion of ener- av conservation measures would be ner the enerav code. a. Are there any envirormiental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? Not to our knowledge. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services would be required by the proposed project. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None required or proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, aircraft, equipment, operation, other) ? Noise from traffic on surrounding roadways could have a minimal inpact on the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would cane from the site. Noise levels would be intermittently high thrrnxghout construc- tion, but should be limited to normal waking hours. After con- struction, residential activity and traffic noise created by daily vehicular trips would increase ambient noise levels in the vicinity. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or oontrol-noise impacts, if any: Standard sound- proofing materials would be used in the construc- tion of residences. Use of proper muffling devices and limita- tion of construction to normal waking hours would minimize construction related noise. .7 .TO BE, COMPLETED BY APPLICAN ( i EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject property is currently undeveloped wooded land with adjacent properties consisting of single family resi- dences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS 20 f. What is the current ccanprehensive plan designation of the site? Low density residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "envirormientally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, the site is located within a hazardous landslide area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Upon completion, approximately 10 people would reside in the development (3.3 per residence x 3 residen- ces). j. Approximately how many people would the co pleted project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN i Ally _� M � � • AGENCY USE ONLY 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Compliance with existing regulatory codes and standards. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-u=m housing. The proposed development will provide 3 high -income residences. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Compliance with regulatory codes and standards would reduce the housing impacts of the proposed develomient. @.� _ •_-. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of any structure would be 2 stories. Exterior building materials are m2gtgd to be of wood. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The observance of building setbacks, retention of as much native vegetation as practical during construction and provision of ornamental and native landscaping would reduce aesthetic im- pacts of the project. 11. Light and Glare a. what type of light or glare will the proposal produce. What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposal would produce light from automobile headlights, street lighting and home li icy twig, primarily at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not to our knowledge. Night lighting would actually promote project safety. c. What existing off -site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? Surrounding residences and traffic. W TO BE COMPL=D BY APPLICAN • i EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state or local preservation registers ]mown to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None }mown. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None ]mown. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Construction would be tem:)orarily halted should evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance be discovered. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. show on site plans, if any. The proposed developmient will use a single access road to enter 75th Place W. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. One mile. 10 'TO BE: OOMPLETED BY APPL.ICAN � j &VALUATION FOR GENCY USE ONLY c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Off -site parking would be acconmiodatcd in residents' driveways and garages. No parking would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal would require the construction of ap- proximately 214 lineal feet of private roadway. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immiediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project should not generate any extraordinary use of water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The proposal would venerate approximately 9 Ain Q AMM x 3 DU) , the majority of which would occur during morn- ing and evening peak periods. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public service (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so generally describe. The proposal would place additional demands on public services; however, facilities are generally in place to handle these addi- tional demands. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Residents would become part of the tax base/user rq_oup that supports these services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available electricity, natural gas, water, refuse sanitary sewer, septic system, other. _ 11 at the site: service, telephone, TO BL COMPLETED BY APPLICAN • j &VALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the imnediate vicinity which might be needed. _See preliminary plat map for list of utilities and purveyors. Typical constructin activities needed for residen- tial projects. C. SIGNARME The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its ion. Signature: ................ '-, i Date Signed :•....... .../. .l . .1gG10..................... D. SUPPIEMETML STET FOR NONPRDTECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; missions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such ins are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 12 To FE ComPTETn BY APPLICAN • i • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for gover mil protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 13 Via: • STRELk F E CITY OF EDMONDS ' LAURA M. HALL _ 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT r -`hosowr p Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 890 19C) August 10, 1994 Mr. Carl Pearson 8227 229th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Single Family Permit #910867 Lot #3 S-8-87 The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the subject permit expired on July 31, 1994, per the expiration date established by the Hearing Examiner decision dated 7/15/93. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 771-0220. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf Acting Building Official • Incorporated August II, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890.1gy- 8T T _l .. CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works . Planning . Parks and Recreation . Engineering May 18, 1994 Mr. Carl & Polly Pearson 8227 229th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Short Plat #S-8-87 @ 163rd & 75th Place West Permit #910302 Short Plat Improvements The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the subject permit expired on May 17, 1994, per the expiration date established by the Hearing Examiner decision dated 7/15/93. A site inspection by City officials has determined that the short plat improvements have not been completed as required by the Hearing Examiner and, therefore, the City Planning Division shall schedule a public hearing for the purpose of voiding the short plat. You shall be notified of the date. If there are any questions at this time please feel free to contact myself or John Bissell at 771-0220. Thank you, Jeannine L. Graf John Bissell Acting Building Official Associate Planner, 9 Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan FO��oao - 1�eJetse� T Mf� RLE d`OV, N� JJ,A P• m CITY OF EDMONDS fr1� 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1 89p99 O Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering _1 August 18, 1993 Mr. Carl Pearson 8227 229th Street Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Building Permit #910867 @ 16311 75th Place West, Lot 3 Building Permit #910302 @ Short Plat S-8-87, Lots 1-3 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to clarify the dates set by the 7/15/93 Hearing Examiners decision for the subject building permits. As you know, additional time has been granted on the permits and the following expiration dates have been established: Permit #910302 shall expire on 5/17/94 which is 259 days from the appeal date of his decision. (Reference AP-93-110 Page 7, #6) Permit #910867 shall expire on 7/31/94, which is one year from the appeal date of his decision. (Reference AP-93-110 Page 6, #5) Please be advised, you are still required to post a $27,000.00 site restoration bond prior to the commencement of work on this permit. Again, it is emphasized, that all work may start. Any construction activity sequencing or special permit conditions made by the previous Building Official are null and void and superseded by the Hearing Examiners decision dated 7/15/93. Conditions of ECDC 19.05.080 and 19.05.090 which establishes construction parameters for earth subsidence areas, shall not be applicable and all decisions to start construction and/or to continue work during the winter months shall be solely the responsibility of your design professionals. The City shall be copied on all professional inspection reports for on -site grading, excavation, utility and foundation work. If you have any additional questions about the expiration dates feel free to contact John Bissell in the Planning Department. Thank you, 6Aannine L. Graf Acting Building Official • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • 71. 3TREE U RLr CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL r } 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT j 9 p Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering 89o_lq - ` 3 ��l /7-3 March 8, 1993 Carl Pearson 8227 - 229th St. S.W. Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Non compliance with short plat (S-8-87) conditions of approval Dear Mr. Pearson, According to the provisions of the short plat (S-8-87), the terms and conditions of approval must be met before the lots can be considered "buildable". In accordance with State law, all plat requirements must be done within two (2) years of final plat approval, and, to date, this has not been done. This letter is your notification, in addition to the notice posted on your property by the City, that you are to inform any prospective buyer of the property, as well as real estate agents, brokers and involved mortgagors, that the property is not "buildable" and no permits will be issued until the conditions of the plat are met. The notice posted on your property shall remain in place until all subdivision conditions and requirements are complete. Since the improvements have not been done within the time limits, it will be necessary to request a time extension up to a year. Please submit such a request to Lyle Chrisman of our office. If you have any questions, call Lyle at 771-0220, extension 324. Sincerely, ROBERT J. ALBERTS, P.E. City Engineer ALC/JCW/sdt c: Sharon Nolan, Permit Coordinator PEARSON/TXTST530 • Incorporated August 11, 1890 O Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 890 19y CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202 COMMUNITY SERVICES: Public Works - Planning - Parks and Recreation - Engineering April 19, 1991 MTN Mal ININUF II PETER E. HAHN DIRECTOR Carl Pearson Post Office Box 70525 Seattle, WA 98107 RE: Short Subdivision i S-8-87 Mr. Pearson: Recently you requested permission to begin the work described in your application for grading permit on your subdivision off 75th Place West. Before I would make a decision, I requested recommendation for the soils engineer of record. On April 1.9, I received and reviewed that recommendation from Terra.Associates, Inc.. At this time I am prepared to issue a permit and allow work to begin - with the following conditions;- 1. The recommendations made by Terra Associates in their report of April 18, 1991, must be followed. 2. Only steps 1-4 of the construction sequence on Sheet 2 of the plans will be permitted at this time. 3. Step 3 of the construction sequence shall be amended to include the installation of "Construction Entrance" shown on the drawing under "Construction Entrance Detail". 4. All debris falling onto streets shall be removed immediately. The streets shall be broomed daily and cleaned at least once a week. 5. Work shall not progress past step 4 of the construction sequence until recommendation is received from Terra Associates and my office has granted permission to continue. If you )have .any questions feel free to call me at 771-3202. Since.." , Richard R. Mumma CBO Building Official City of Edmonds cc: Jim Walker, Hydraulic Engineer Bill Evans, Landua Assc. pearson.rrm • Incorporated August II, 1890 - Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan City of Edmond RIGHT-OF-WAY C9yS SCR CTION PE 0j�c � � Permit Number: 3 6" Issue Date: A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16311 75 Place West B. Type of Work (be specific): C. Contractor: Washington Natural Gas Company Mailing Address: 815 Mercer Street, State License #: Seattle, WA 98111 Install New Service a Contact:. Gary Swanson Phone: 224-2080 Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit a (if applicable): -;- Side Sewer Permit #;(if applicable): E. ❑ . Commercial ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ® Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPEC.T'OIt: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ® Yes ❑No (1) G. Size of Cut: H. Charge $ @Gas( APPLICANT TO READ ANa6GN'^ ) INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application -agrees to hold the City of Edmonds hatntless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be.'niade against the City of Eilntonds, or any of its departments or employ- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings incl al' defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR /S RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND M ALS FOR A PERIO eOF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL /NSPEC770N AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ES77MA7ED RESTORA7ON FEES WILL BE HELD,UN77L T Y%E INAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDITWILL BE PR0CESSED'FOR IdSUANCE TO APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call.the Engineering Department- 771-3202. Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. . Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City.Engineer. All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved` material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at all times for inspection purposes. Signature: 044 A 4 Date: December, 2 1991 (Contractor dr1A•g6dt) I t r CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK __ FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY .RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSrr: r rIME,AUTHORIZED VOID.AFTER., FOR 1y DAYS.. DISRUPTION.FEE/EUND 11:1: 5PECIAL CONDITIONS:. -- )( -! uT - RESTORATION FEE::.; ...........cc:. 'h nC1 �TOTAL FEE::: 4=` .. . . . MMENTS:. RECEIPT.:NO: ....... .... ... .. __. DATE: ..... _ . _:::.::.:ISSUED BY:.. M PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSU Engrg. Div. 1991 Eng. Div. July 1985 A Washington Natural Gas Awahngton EnergycornpwN "-WNG to window Water main depth unknown i gas, main Addendum to City of Edmonds Right of Way Permit Application Submitted by: Kerry Walsh Engineering Aide Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 x2761 pager 969-1686 -w- water -g- gas -ss- sewer water hydrant 815 Mercer St. (P.O. Box 1869), Seattle, WA 98111 (206) 622-6767 a C. C .. •rid YfII ti• r•.. f^ ;t . t ... .. .. ... . , City of EdmondSTREET FUE' I rTu -OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT Permit Number: `! 1 O 3 ? U C T 2 1 1991 q Issue Date: / r 0 1 / ENGINEERING 16 311 75--r�l PLA4 wi-sT A. Address or Vicinityof Construction: �, _ B. Type of Work (be specific): GO1�IN h l -r SEIM�LS k/h-:n1 f) 9 0 9 , pn��►,+ �s, ( � �c.l �c�_, 4/10044 jam Contractor: CKL 1 EMISOIJ Contact: �.►/�Q-i..• P(:i�FRSQI`f Mailing Address: g22�7 22C(TN SW r tr!toyhone: 6 32-2363 State License #: �0 WNW 11 Liability Insurance: 1(. Bond: $ 27,i�u Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): E. ❑ Commercial 4�q Subdivision ❑ City Project J�r Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) ❑ Multi -Family ❑ Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ,® Yes ❑No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $_ APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employ-- ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ES77MATE'D RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hournotice is required.for inspection; Please call the Engineering Department- 771-3202. Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. All street cut ditches'shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on site at'all tim for ins ect' p oses. . Signature: Date: (Contractor or Agent) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK NO WORK SHALL Engrg. Div. 1991 Irk FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund III - Route copy to Street Dept.) . Comments: Diagram: a CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION O YES O NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. J STREET FI L E ,t a oyppn.•„ USE ',� ERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE riuM`ER5r'D®Z i. CONSTRUCTION -PERMIT :'APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS �--�\5-%%I A� �S7— OL(_%ePE4Rsorj LEGAL DESCRIPTION C / S B I I ION NO. .a, LID NO. w MAILING ADDRESS ��! ,1j S -8 7 2 �v 3{'•..z2.7 ZZ.aTI4 caw �'T/ O ''% - PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP CITYY,'• ; ZIP. `. TELEPHONE NUMBER tq/r( EXISTING_ REQUIRE,? DEDICATION APPROVED BY . 4' O rt o►�os 9<902o � 2 - 2 3 4,; 1 NAMERRq . - PROPOSED (7 GQU'VP 1 OUI" NC, RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED O W w A`DDRESS I1`' ` , l STREET USE PERMIT REOUIREO ❑ z t T�� - YVO(%�/t ►.i (/t l l(1 vvY N F- SELF ENGINEERING MEM DATED . REVIEW BY W C CItT�y' ZIP TELEPHONE N/UMLBERt 1 �y � �3 G � �O�jl�kVin LL 0 11 l0 G "� 2'.f _i REMARKS NAME % OS Ru�c-�rcE C�}-T i NL �N L %� / ��rr i ��r a�� 7�yc' :Q -ADDRESS _ Gl(�t`vl f'y `I1 OF 2 1 METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE FIXTURE UNITS CITY �'�FP�w TELEPHONE NUMBER ¢ w 0 REMARKS 3 O STATE LICENSE NUMBER 77/_ -Q�' 9 w �• �kW XWOUA SIGN AREA ENV. REVIEW ADB NO. C ALLOWED., PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT LegaLDescription of Property =include all „easements (show below, or attach two copies),::...., sHOREUNE# 0 a „, 5 P,�R .�Vh(i1lJi�f(�� rIL� D VARIANCE O CU PLANNING REVIEW .BY DDA�TE } SETBACKS - FEET HEIGHT LOT COVERAG ? And Cvh1oITIONA VSr Z J , , _ FRONT SIDE REAR Z Tax Account Parcel No. �� .. �2-01 bs REMARKS CL g I, QC2U-_ 2 ;0oblc ,NEW ©. RESIDENTIAL 0 PLUMBING /•/�N .ADD/ALTER COMMERCIAL. '' MECHANICAL APT. BLDG. � REPAIR' SIG n EXCAVATE, FILL.-, E H KED YP O.F U TION. CODE HEIGHT +' ;DEMOLISH.} IG�I OR GRADE i .. T) ' 011y CARPORT 1 i L_ REMODEL a, GARAGE P CIAL P OR REA OCCUPANCY'` OCCUPANT 0O - OUIRED GROUP �OAD 16 WOOD STOVE/ RETAINING WAL YES f.. r, ..❑;, . INSERT ROCKERY, ; t: - : . • ❑',; RENEWAL REMARKS (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:', '' PROGRESS INSPECTIONS' PER UBC 305 OP') wNUMBER OF STOR N ER •Y .Pt �' m o N, AA71 4, afteww'41 mo TS ' NATURE OF WOR E.' • E A AC OT N).. �'�—EAR' N S i p f�ENcH 2atn FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED VALUATION FEE' Rc.C.T IiJN r}�u p - - - /,, - PI �PLAN CHECK FEE (Dr-17Pa& ^ t"1 PIZOurs- r N% BUILDING "/ S"T-M f L LA/t5T ('OW 1L ; WprTFIL SI�.W) PLUMBING Plan•Check No. MECHANICAL h .This Permit covers work'to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, ,I ""'driveways,'marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days "• fi Fermif'Limit: 1-Year- Provided Wor{S is Started Within 180 Days'' .. r� y �r .App.licant; on. behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and4vC) O :successors in interest, agrees to, indemnify, defend and hold IS AT PP (CANIYOtAv'y ' w ..harmless the* City of Edmonds,*. Washington, Its officials, p 5 -employees,' and agents from any and .all claims for damages of 0.rJ G.. a .whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly -from the issuance o ''of`ahis'pe`rmif: Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT 2 �Z Zv J #modify;:. waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance � _ {nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE �provlsion. I,hereby.acknowledge that I have read this application; - that the 1 iriformation given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly' ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authoriied •agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT •state IawsYegulating construction; and in doing the workauthoriz• AUTHORIzes ._This application is not a permit until'` 1.ed;•thereb y,•no person will be employed�in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official .or his; r' `Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and recei t..is; 'tion`tnsurance. ��cknow]l dg I.ln spa Ge'pl0 i- d INSPECTION SI TURF ( WN OR NT) DATE IGNED DEPARTMENT .;;r. OFFICIAL �_�I ATQR ATE +'-°' ? G•u��--s.� 7�� CITY OFEDIVIONDS .. / / CALL FOR R6`LEASED BY:. i DATE / :yATTENTION INSPECTION UNLAWFUL T0'USE-OR-OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 771-3202 ;UNT(Li'A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector,: -�'A,;;CEgTIFICATE . OF OCCUPANCY • HAS • RFEN GRANTED. UBC y, ,r -,CFI.APTER 3..' /V_ ��: PINK — Owner GOLD -Assessor � I t 4 � N V Q � I . Syr• � ,:,. • ., yE/�Dl1YY,O�IL� jPE�/1EJV . - - - '- CITY OF EDMO408 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWN R NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS APL -k POL�,Y P�PrR-S OtA MAILING ADDRESS <�2 277 2 T� 5L / CITY ZIP,. TELEPHONE NUMBER f�K EDno►��5 `f�o2( 32-23 3 NAM old ADDRESS 109 CENJRk�- W" t*2o► CITY -' ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER upri-ARg033 <527-4(?i+-7 NAMEI __.r+,rL. Aro&44✓ - 6lq/We/L ADD CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER Legal Description of Property - include all easements (show below or attach two copies) FPS �fL SU6D�ViSo�+Ff,�c �S-5� Tax Account Parcel No.5131 _000-062_0 l O,S ® NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADD/ALTER COMMERCIAL EC L • REPAIR APT. BLDG.EXCAVATE, F� ' DEMOLISH �_:OR GRADE FILL ❑ PENCE x _FT) CARPORT REMODEL GARAGE -� ❑ WOOD STOVE/ a RETAINING WALLf!7=5WAL INSERT ROCKERY(T OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPL E v I L-D NEW NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF 2 DWELLING I UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOTigLAN) PL4t- .s_ y ZONE n NUR JOB �KI MBE ADDRESS / / 7 _ ) SUITE/APT N .�a..� vcai,nirnvry GntUK SUBDIVISION NO. LID NO. PUBLIC RIGHJ OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET V MAP. TESCP ''ll APPROVED BY EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED O STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED ❑ SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATE( If400#4i447 E ' / w � f BUILDIN �$I.J'IPPLY SIZE FIXTURE U� BY SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED ENV. REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT ADB N0. . SHORELINE VARIANCE OR Cu CLk It�QQ P ANNIN IEW,BY % ' .T A � SETBACKS — FEET .., FRONT SIDE / �p S' REAR Grj HEIGHT LOT VERg9E CHF�CI�ED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE HEIGHT 25 PECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT E UIRED GROUP Q LOAD 7� YES ❑ NO ARKS 3rz �41T/44�/t PERn9/TGC/w0/TT0'yS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 BUILDING PLUMBING Plan Check No.� MECHANICAL iAny This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, GRADING/FILL G,�30Z STATE SURCHARGE driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days a'rA%�'!'�I�V�Pw "Applicant, on'behalf of his orher spouse; heirs, assigns and :rLk L`170✓F['� imodify,.waive u) w 5 i successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of Whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of. this permit shall not be deemed to or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED ti n Insurance. fGN TUBE (OWNj ENT) DATE 3�SIGNE �/ INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR INSPECTION i SIT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 771-3202 I JNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR... . i > CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC FEE ly /ems /OZS o —//k.3 1916 APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided/ DAT zr - / v ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — In Dector Z w z Z w W a a Z CD 0 N t kR I 11 0 0 Z Q J I- 0 J 0. Ic w N Fr t0 H d ill lpage of2 CITY CLERK CITY OF EDMONDS 505 BELL STREET F''_`, IONDS. WA 98020 CITY OF EDMONDS RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and described as follows, See Exhibit "B" have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec 20.75) File No. S-8-87 subject to the following conditions and requirements: 1. This recording supersedes the documents recorded under recording number 9003220220, Vol. 2320 page 1535 through 1538 Exhibit C, Hold Harmless Covenants for ingress and egress and utility access; and for construction and maintenance of all development shown on the utility development plan as described below in paragraph number 4. Recorded as Numbers 9410250017 and 9410250018 in Volume 2970, pages 2673 through 2680. 4. The plan drawn by Group Four stamped 5/18/90 entitled "Carl Pearson Grading and Drainage" and accepted and approved by the City of Edmonds Engineering Division on May 14, 1991, satisfies the requirements of a drainage plan as defined by ECDC 18.30.020 and as a utility development plan as defined by ECDC 18.40.000(4). This plan is considered the Utility Development Plan. This approved Utility Development Plan is considered a condition of the subdivision and thus is exempt from the requirement of a building or grading permit according to ECDC 18.40.000(4). 5. All improvements shown on the approved Utility Development Plan must be complete prior to the issuance of any permits except those already issued prior to July 1, 1994, and those necessary to complete improvements required by the approved utility development plan. Therefore these improvements are considered deferred subdivision requirements. No other permits shall be issued on any lots of the short plat until all deferred improvements have been constructed, completed, and approved by the City of Edmonds Community Services Department. 6. A turn -around built to the City of Edmonds Engineering Division standards is required on the plans of a building permit for a new single family dwelling, and must be completed prior to occupancy. The building setbacks shown on the map recorded with this recording are established by a modification and shall be the required setbacks. No native growth east of the toe of the slope shall be disturbed unless dead, dying, diseased, and or posing a hazard to the public. The property owner, however, may maintain landscaping to protect the base of the slope, and the maintenance shall not be considered a disturbance. Landscape planting for erosion control is required throughout the site. Landscape irrigation system(s) needing permits by the City of Edmonds are prohibited from the plat or any individual developments, unless a specific design is approved by a licensed geotechnical engineer, subject to the City of Edmonds Landslide Hazard Ordinance (ECDC 19.05). 11. No swimming pools shall be located on the subject property unless the design is specifically approved by a licensed geotechnical engineer subject to review according the City of Edmonds Landslide Hazard Ordinance (ECDC section 19.05). 12. All work on the property, including clearing, grading and installation of utilities shall be conducted under the supervision of a licensed geotechnical engineer. 13. The applicant shall follow all requirements of the Engineering Division as found in the City of Edmonds Planning Division file S-8-87, and as required by the AP93110A.DOC vni 21.12Phr,F1422 any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare that subdivisions void and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of the Snohomish County Auditor. (!� Signed: STATE OF WASHINGTON) KING ) ss: COUNTY OF MMEMMI) On this day personally appeared before me Carl Pearson, Polly Pearson and Dolores S . ' Dean __ 9 to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal this 22ndday of 4 ' a AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONDS PLAN ENG i PAGE OF 19 94 ratery Public in and for the of Washington residing at Seattle.. 2/25/95 AP93110A.DOC vni. �1.12nu1423 • • ......... . EXHIBIT A �» N SHORT PLAT FOR WILLIAM & PAT SCULLY ��� i •JzU la vi 2o. ,-- ' > Z �� U O Yam. 0 • J 1 W _ _ _ 3G. 5• z PLAT ' f 36%•5G csLc. /_ - exsr Jr o•taiy-y� 359• � A, '�,. o a _' to N B7 `35•'43" w �t� lc U �' 1 tJ 0 35, 51 a 5q. FT. IC N.L11,4e G'T1L.G3 I (v NS703 '/311 4oG.35 ti + ' h �✓ W �� STAHd OF AGOCR 4-/2"D/w. �OV � (9 in , 0 p 0 n1 z' I 37, Gzg 5Q. f-r. i 77NNST� 3543"w 440. to 465_57 O i k 1 G.4. T + s-T- R EET S .fir/• T �"5 GZ.&63,MEADowDtat� 3F 1�� rC-EFI-fr--m :" ILECO �� R 1"'�E 'R'��ED IN vOL.uME 5 pF 5VECVE=-y F- E XD of SVtLVEI VOL. Z.L OF 38,R DS0F3KOHOMI.5H Gs ZJj-�c�olzaiNc�No.aglzi35�9 �AIJNTY> WASHINC,jTOil. E: See City of Edmon s e No. S-8-87 for ZUCCy ns and conditions of AUTHORIZED o ••'"" 1 Ew F s short subdivision. FOR RECORDING : �' CITY OF EDMONDS I A , NORTH L-opGAE I :ONFO � 7 9 4 7 •3-•P9- 87 `�7 OF G. ITY GROUP FOUR, INC. CITY CLERK CIVIC CENTER EDMONDS. WA 98020 Lot 1 EXHIBIT B WILLIAM SCULLY SHORT PLAT CITY OF EDMONDS FILE #S-8-87 85-0529 8/28/89 The South 90.00 feet of tract 63, Meadowdale Beach as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38 Records of Snohomish County, Washington. EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet thereof. Lot 2 Tracts 62 and 63, Meadowdale Beach as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38 Records of Snohomish County, Washington. EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet thereof. EXCEPT the South 90.00 feet of said Tract 63. EXCEPT the North 91.14 feet of said Tract 62. Lot 3 The North 91.14 feet of Tract 62, Meadowdale Beach, as per plat recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, Records of Snohomish County, Washington. EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet thereof. WRITTEN BY 4, CHECKED BY GR 0 UP FOUR, INC. 19S02 Stith five. TF. Lynnwood, 91,4 98036' AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONr) • Q� zuce �4°vE \N AS�l.{•.�I t7u�2 F Elul; PAGE OF _,.. T A • A /1 J I e% JW. File Number S-8-87 ENMBIT C HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Owner, and all persons having any present or subsequent ownership interest in these lands, and the successors and assigns of owners or other parties having any said interest, hereby agree that the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless in all respects from any and all claims for damages for injunctive relief which may be occasioned now or in the future to adjacent land or improvements by reason of the construction, operation and maintenance of the drainage system and hereby waive and release the City of Edmonds from any and all claims for damages, excluding damage caused solely by an act or omission of said City and injunctive relief which the owners, or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now or in the future by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of said drainage system. AUTHORIZED FOR RECORDING CITY OF EDMONDS PLAN NG� PAGE OF M o to CP -v x =c �0 M ! `n t C I O M C O �Q zv0 304 0 7 2119) ,h` City oirEdmonds* - RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT permit Number: Issue Date: { A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: I �3I 15 ��-Aw F.� 1 l 8 9 0 1 9 B. Type of Work (be specific):(2p n4j—,aJc -T&A bqP !�0poyi 1oZ A•NO C. Contractor: 'Y'iw p Nu w I (fz � 'Z�N L Contact: RE) — Mailing Address: ?FQ6 t5f�3 5 j AA/r AL L Phone: 9 +E-- IF ( 4--a 2 G — .to1� State License #: (T-_Qt)c 06 o Liability Insurance: Bond: $ D. Building Permit # (if applicable): 1� O -7 I Side Sewer Permit #, (if applicable): _ t E. ❑ Commercial , ❑ Subdivision ❑ City Project ❑ . Multi -Family Single Family ❑ Other INSPECTOR:—, F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : ❑ Yes YNO INSPECTOR: ❑ Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER) Y G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge $ q9' APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costa, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT. Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. Work and material is to be inspected during progress.and at completion. Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. Street shall be kept clean at all times. Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Enginee�i-- All street cut ditches. shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available on siN at me.s o inspection purposes. 2 Signature: �� Date: I S J -(Contractor or t) CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK FOR CITY USE ONLY APPROVED BY: "- RIGHT OF WAY'DEPOSIT TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER D ec - ' Sg Q 6 DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND Ill: "i'SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 422""44i� i S°L`4 RESTORATION FEE: -f.-u W ' PERMIT FEE: . Caol _ a 2 TOTAL FEE: 99,14 COMMENTS: S' �oa L`-t StOt^° RECEIPT.R3E: �' e Ci t7' rid DATE: C9e { : 2 , 96 ISSUED BY:. NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. 1994 0 /4%0 • FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments Diagram; (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES Partial Work Inspection by P.W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: ❑ NO Rio *!W ��N I m IML7A*-,R io .0 O 0- 49 ZW� ON L'frl ca > rn •" ..» _ o U M 1- IAN �( +O l� + w Q 0 =�Qn L' Ul.4oN O O 0 w O [L < �C 6bZ0£99092 dnoaD NJ1:inu fra �o, _ "" OOMDOJ10Y47 P. 01 m.cnurlen design group 402 avenue `A' SNOHOMISH WA. 98290 VOICE/FAX Q60) 563-0249 I FAX COVER SHEET TOTAL PAGES 1NCLtMW THIS COVER SKEET - 2 nAM ZCY% To: John 5155e1 Flannina Dept city of Edmand5 FROM: RON MGNUKLEN HERE 15 THE PARTIAL COPY OF THE CIVIL SITE PLAN BY &&OUP 4, 15EL.IEVE NE GAIN U5E THE CATCH 5A51N NOTED ON THE DR,4NIN S AS THE "BENCHMARK" FOR THE PEAR50N KMPENCZ. IF TH15 I5 NOT 5AT15FAGTORY LET ME KNON NHAT YOU NEED......... - {J'x ,rYM -M'11 1 •'v�«.c�ti uca tan l.afCUUY' 5610.76.Sb24�J P. r New 1`yRAT Wi G I N�a /• / {� f� . �m 1OGATIAV To a r i �•-`� i �•�a. �" 0.V. 1G. �75 G2ulf� fWN&� r �J�A F� 1- d, 0.1 O04 Qwa,�t b D' pvc r � fJ F-YY 4" t'VG L,AtA. G,Q/N Cno L F r l ^' f y , de 4v L Yo CB�3 � �� � . • p- � 78 LF- co" GMT' a. O+ 22^y 19' Rl" (F-UP CUP.8 A&jlD I e tat If ry s� p-ti • . I '1 �r �r� f OJT. NR'.H.r m � 1 Ln ;1 r • • 1�*Nt 0 NO�� I W r�4 U 75 th place i ecr WORN, MEIN ilI�IIIIo ►0 0 cwi nFCTr.N GROUP 3605630249 P.01 m s ■ m om >dl U U � 7$ th \54. 0 IV O Zn co North o. A ° tNftrnp� _ 1 D(�i pni to n M , b -p C 29.14' _ _ 4V °lop 14' R_t G Z/ o 0 wN Y f 7z O 7;!S� 7ab .73s O ck i _ ` CITY OF EDMONDS USE Z°"E �'— NUMBIER 960071 t CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION _ JOB / f„ 1,9 L(TE ADDRESS /APT a / U� OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS C NR9 L� ®t_L� 1P� ® t� i i ��( JJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK SUBDIVISION U � w Z MAILING ADDRESS *7 2 9-rw 5 -RIGHT TESCP Approved ❑ j I 1 PUBLIC OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. / f, �j REQUIRED DEDICATION RW Permit Required ❑ eV CITY ZIP TELEPHOaNEN%U�MBER % +✓ { a® f"�1J� �® G. tl 9✓ �, 0 EXISTING—YL[lG-- Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ Inspection PROPOSED Required Sidewalk Requireedd ❑ w NAME � MSIZE i LINWIZE NO. ITURES PRV REQUIRED �- 3 YES NO OwADDRESS 1: �� 1 �" - A s V L Pr f] c7 REMARKS f a "8+t jM5Mt Lab W Z a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Aw Dfa,Ka5c PIRA rate -ruts Z OWTV-endpaptlog Sao h`FZWo 360 - 513-024-9 sr-9 FLAT Imfwao NAME �►r 61M,4 F 1`14I • MtB� I tt I j ¢ O ADDRE 5 ENGINEERING MEMO DATED � —�6 �! REVIEWED BY ZIP TELEPHONE O CI ,�ms� 14? NUMBER °�,/ _1071 FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY W U. U STATE LICENSE NUMBER W EXPIR 710N DATE ' 9� SIGN AREA SEPA REVIEW ADB NO. Legal Description of Property - include all easements ALLOWED PROPOSED GOMPLE E p� �Y'a► EXEMPT �� �f P�"tt` SHO/PELINEY _ EX /C F Q r, U -96. L_® VARIANCE OR CU P EW BY D E Lu SETBACKS —FEET►®� HE�IGH�T^ (� LOT CO ERASE Z a FRONT 2 SIDE REAR �7 ul Property (� 5, Tax Account 5'� ` a ®®— ®b� ® " v REMARKS g o Parcel No. rccel `hNEW ® PLUMBING(MECH Ig RESIDENTIAL COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE ADDITION COMMERCIAL APT. BLDG. SIGN REMODEL rM GRADING FENCE REPAIR CYDS. (_X_Fn CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE / — `9 i OCCUPANT GR P WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL DEMOLISH ❑ INSERT HOT TUB/SPA SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED AREA J it OCCUPANT LOAD YES �GARAGE ❑ RETAINING WALL/ RT ROCKERY RENEWAL REMARKS (TYPE of USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONSPERUBC 108 Z ITICAL , f w NUMBER o OF NUMBER OF DWELLING CRat ,� AREAS 4GpmF NUMBER d ,pv �`�74/�7 to STORIES UNITS DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) 0Bt.� C- ®,�9 S- cf ifs` Dkt,4_ l FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED y► ® VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE ;14"@� � BUILDING �® . HEAT SOURCEIr GLAZIN % PLUMBING Plan Check No. :- 2 /20 MECHANICAL GRADING/FILL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE ,n successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold w harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for. damages of iwhatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT e-/%y 4.e • e 0 modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance to any ordinance ����en i nor limit in any way the City's ability enforce TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz• AUTHORIZES THE signed by the Building Official or his/her ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa• ONLY WORK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided. SIGN RE IOW RpLiiiiiiiiiiiiij DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT OFIA 'S SI NATURE I CITY OF �3 jjTE i EDMONDS CALL FOR RE SE , DATE 6 ATTENTION INSPECTION r ' l (} IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ��� Owwo 11 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW —Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK =Owner GOLD _ Assessor 10247 G(L2 7iio,5�11 TIE I CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION i OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS w MAILING ADDRESS Z 2, Z � 2 q�W 3 f O CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER V4 62.1-02-03 ESS l N-V E ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Igo RUH15 4 9,92%1360 .5b - 02 ZIP ITELEPHONE NUMBER STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIR TION DATE Legal Description of Property - Include all easements PERMIT NUMBER TE/APT N ADDRESS _ (5 0 Ii 07 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved O RW Permit Required ❑ EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd ❑ LoC"1' Inspection Required Im PROPOSED Sidewalk Required ❑ M SIZE LINE.SIZE /�e NO. OF FIXTURES 7 4ey PRV RE UIRED YES)f NO 0 Property �'� 1 .• ®o ► V� Tax Account d ti 1050 Parcel No, KNEW ® RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING(MECH El COMPLIANCE OR ADDITION COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE APT. BLDG. REMODEL SIGN GRADING ❑ FENCE REPAIR CYOS. ( x_FT) OVE � SWIM POOL DEMOLISH INSERTwooDS INSERT HOT TUB/SPA WGARAGE VARA 9RT RETAINING WALL/ ROCKERY RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL OF DWELLING ' AREAS STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) C,.oTa s-'mac.-r New ��aSt�itr�c� WST7 u- D 1c-p= yt p Iti A fate 'TFh 5 �1 Grypa l� G' yYfQ' • Pat4S'(•• Fb�+1 Fitt It%-Sf ENGINEERING MEMO DATED ?-1- qr. REVIEWED BY FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED SEPAREVIEW COMPLE EXEM�PPTT AoB NO. l All �Jpl- °' 7 1['Ij'• S,HlOPELINEN A EX 1✓V /i ! VARIANCE OR CU P EW BY D E e SETBACKS — FEET *10yk HEIGHT LOT CO ERA6E �y FRONT 1�457 SIDE REAR 42 REMARKS .. •� �' ) �-' (,/ f7,,:. �� �r tad: � �! � %'� ,p s CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE (/ OCCUPANT GR P� i' SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED ❑ YES /j-3 6 LOAD REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108 `rW.4G AY hi44L4. Commcr®II FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED P1411 D h th PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SOURCE: d; GLAZIN PLUMBING Plan Check No. .e-/70 MECHANICAL GRADINGIFILL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.' Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days . STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for.damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision." ENG. INSPECTION FEE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application, t at information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly a ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES THE signed by the Building Official or his/her ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY woRK NOTED Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- acknowledged in space provided. tion Insurance and RCW 18.27. INSPECTION SIGN RE IOW R 0 E OATE SIGNED �j DEPARTMENT CITY OF OF I 'S SI NATURE jjTE 1 EDMONDS CALL FOR DATE ATTENTION INSPECTION Q i:!Z IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE 771 Owwo UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR ' 1 11 ORIGINAL —File YELLOW— Inspector A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 108 PINK —?Owner GOLD — Assessor a s J 10247 '28 SEC. 5 TW P 27 N RGE- 4 F W 8" I PROJECT SITE'. � 3t w LU Q 0 .0) 160TH ST. SW,; Q . 164TH ST SW • t7LUG. A13ANC>OIU c�L DATUM: CITY OF EDMONDS l.oCAT� tit w � ' MX I -ST. c•u LV F-z r e \ TOP OF SSMH BENCHMARK:. A0 `1-IowN • '°v o WPCt`' ''` ham` 3s L� r2"se �,�° `SOUTH OF SOUTH t AT TOE OF y`� q ►�EMGN� aCt�('11VG-t PIPE /',, �� S ` 18.4 % `' VICINITY AP. ee° � • � �ryyy: e .°'`° •q� 'o ',c .. � � 7uF- 12"GI'GtS.G,1 / � • � '-� HILL ON 76TH AVE. W. = 78.9• NO SCALE / �� o - y� 09 m_--_ s ___._ ... 2 �/1V'�'AKt?910A l v °` l �y� Gg �I2 (TYPE r) GLE.J�.NGLtT y!, Y~ _ _5 q� -55 �.� \m * ^� Ia .15�.3G t Z",� ��" ? `n Lf 4 :v �•�� w% AME yIZATt: T� = I lG. b0 t ✓7� ,`ei -� _ � , "' ;, q -- --:-'s -- •r' .0 Top 1I5.5(I) IE n9�.�}0 ,d. "` - K N6'7°35' �3 W ` ° 1. t=. t 12. o �\19 �a� �DP ; • ti +" - y /q ` ^ 117 1.E IZt' GP �` 'v 1©$ 6aJ. �j x - / ; ^ t° \�c� /' % la - 20 -/6TsTy�M Gi-'t✓r1° �.4�% ,�,a� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 62 AND 63 IN THE �o ��"�' , .' �•°� �"q� + Eby ot= � �♦k�y-`-'�`.h, _ � R�t�� ./ ,� �.•/,• - /• / / ' ; / , / ; / .,: � PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH. '%�.XJhT Gta �' /, b•yph1 � �'` ���`/l ° QO�'�,O n6`'h ' e,,��' �A .. .._ _ ... / I,,�' �� / /// C.p 6.5%G /n��. i' , 1 A I Q �` + �1 (r mn' / / Q l 1•'' �� b r / re CC .SS 9E!-'I ►.I-T �C015 - - - q, 0 f ffry ��t� F0UkIi)AT1COPj ' _ � � � ° < WAt-l. n12A11�1 �- I,. � / A551MIWT �1>��G r :V / .. �- D, i -•`Q, `��PV ! �i rp`� , 21 <cC' SQ' �� ` 17 / 0 0�.roe O. A�� �QJ0��, s-rur� �02- �n ^ \..d ,�,� �\�ti•'// �� _ �� 24r, A. all 41. ARImA D t�G � � 'iHI KaJ h .5T G~ELo. L= 'r; AREA p oNlNY TG !NL. TP 10 V to/ A �---"-`--•-.'d_o..e.. Q•�- r1 1 4"2G,tRGLLS\ g-Dw'-✓flH SU�� RGPOMpGTEv 7U FOt 3A�6 17EPTH CIW5NE7 Top\y0, CQUfzSE �,ArvGuT NET S��S �. �Fa_ _ _ _ 1 GK� Y ACCESS ROAD SECTION Ar�FA vRAI eJ >- S1 - - _ �� / sc 1a/titT - t�nATG1-1 TO NEW t_ - / TA I _ j NO SCALE �/t.AT WIDF.tll Nf� Y�r/ G � trE �,'' oo -1\as ,�jl a q Z 1 v `r-`-- ( Invert of interceptor drain given is tipproximate only and shall be subject to the exact A --• �'� / /' depth of the, Whidbey formation. A geotech shall be retained to observe conditions in. q./ / ,Q°' °qP 111 O th.trench'durin construction. : .-•'' - e� i 2L7 TD r.Xa� OF' Do' 0 / //� ° / �° D�° Ftit,�tT. J� / l / / / c�eat�t:. rb tl�l TO st wER S �F� IZh. C,1' I.tx7/o `�1 r / . / A -' � �� "' h ti Y� / / ►u ss cl,�nJou � tom.' �. >✓t: / / �. � 1 t 1. // � � I •-" ;;.; � G' � (� � q�P a� r0/ I 3 / /°�° � T - t t Ioo�- __/ t•;✓ ( 8.t� //'. ��/� � o��'•.•.t.•;+.�•••..•., 1•UGATIGV Tb l3l:� `rNtctC ��. l ,�TIVE 1501LIAC -D. =5t==t b FIELD Y. ZtFl;w© Ce7+G rC-go, ,Pto lkle_U�� 2 / t�Uc�tF_ ;.i 1.41: FILL ALJP Sa,iw /°,n LID t-octc1A1G L i u�l t �. s75 CIZ"0 0 (ST=605'b. . (.F^ 12° GP �1e�.\D!, rye` ,v :'ati I -I•b5% � / (9� I #V, y : R I�FZA7LJtt�Ct t^'.I'll� , ' :o R751=ll OF kJq'I (ED 12f1 S 4' FERF, P/G P;i �i� / - / / \A'''� /- ' � �vEL G-1„• o ='dRAE Caa -$- 1 UD , ;• 15 LF.-12 SD �kr�" �'•41'1.Ty� �$ °`1 •� 10' .�61 •` °• �iL'(F�Z.otzlc . N _ _ t0 �/ ` �5 t� WEIII%if �zr•1�c�tc�tJ z' t� It4rJ4 I�MfVFA ED P _ / / �� PUG Pl Fr-, SLoM TV ► 7'.9.$b l 4 4f �tzF Pvc / r / fi / 1z"-24` p�rzjrvc ` C) 0 y7 t!op l w I V I�l FiW %�'' I'vG G�AT\L GAY\! 3 / OQKNOTE: METHOD OF DRAIN INSTALLATION AND TRENCH SIDEWALL Z Y ( STABILITY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR GjVG. (� 2.Dojo t\,/111V a ; / �r o?.0'-'' --� .... 1 , - I O ([, , `vJ I..F 12'i 5b gx �q I � SEE GEOTECH REPORT T-335 DATED AUGUST 19,1987 _i '-'�- "" ) q�J' BY TERRA ASSOC:, INC. Wtis:+toepw ``' \ � O tr10 / oP` o ( 4(70LiEwAT�R Mt;T1=►� / , ;'' �{ '#-t(7 7L-54") Cfj © J ��° C(� N min \ �1�ti��' ,A� INTEF CEPTC�R 1'REI\ICH SECTIC'�IV TY�IC�4L) TV vr� 3 , tk-r�U� o: M-rAIL S-4AF-ET 33.75 7.1-) �`�, • �.. / lz s. 2� •r32, 50-Co. I t'v er (*r i-IE ICal-IT 10 o C1`ft LF'-- CotD P u 0.5% EA5EH 0`MDIED I I j / 1 �' J j -go, AccES3 UTI,'ITt' EIJT (Etly CUPS AtJ17 ' ' i ° \o� • `o''' 6,um-:,R) P�arH a 1�' t � >✓st1T FAD -i1-Itc ,tj� E IDS. i / SSE5 / U. ; oCUP t '!5'uT 1ER .>7rH 31 pFS. 0. to \CP'°�� cam; o / I CV 9`._- 725 1 Lcrr Irr / t a •, �'k^ ! wry. 1 e�ti' / ,.. r't^ d a ' hey o>` I/ / �`� bpi (`j'1'Io� .eft TE 8 .0 �ll' - - Gov o ' `°� Oo�, I ti '2y G.�t'D C.2MEIlT - "-r .- - 1 TIriLCl=1'Tb!'L . At, IV 6 q^ o V ...-.. , //// o' a O" oe 74o9/d �N ✓: oo �fi �` .. ' o i , °' / Cr�� - W 4° PE%'F. PIPE. J ^ /!' ' i�. z /Z N6 l ' ee n •• 1' ' O DN tN RtS •, ���\' 1 1 w•`.• T- .Z 3 0 o o ° �l--�y�Dt�AtN ri�aHTL.tuE t: I I � _ \ "' / �ti o,� �`° D. 1 / / SEE 1 TAl L r ' i� \• tZ0C 4<t X<-r, I-tt, to HT l*h 0 VN ANVN aQ PLAt`.1 C1'11:'F- 0A' n 0- 20�' 2"GbMI'1DEPo TH 6\2 SAASf H. LdNG,. ax I e),r. ca 24' .G-T�P V 3 c 95.05 !Z"Our ' Z--"gprcow 6nnwe7u8 ` MAIM �JR/V/ MDtttla t�'hGOEIPcs 7MEI �tIIJ-S) GR »�YbNb GG+Litc�GiC.(lt/2" MtNUS) 164�h �1'. . . �•+pl-rtc�»t s .--ct��u�T III c•H. (NOT OPEN) • ��z c-r�rP� a�,,t� �, � ¢s-' i ... • f . • ' ACCESS RO�►D SECTION OWNER DEVELOPER: CARL PEARSON P.O. BOX 70525 201 NW. 36TH ST. SEATTLE, WA. 98107 10LACM PILTEIR F'AI31RIG A5 SHOWN. 5EP- C7ETAIL 5HEET Z. CS # 9 CB# >O mm 1) CB# f I W/F'RN vta o, qm m, INe:imu- W/1✓R&M ' d\lEr� 1;X 12" T - 870b -- 1 o'I.00 ' is 9,7.weieOti-0 14J1� ^'E TAU,. �/',( CK ex ap rim TE= �' 05.oD C12" 1 N) [� - ►0�.23 (EX 8"�ExIsG , °` y ll✓ = t04.� 6J9w 12"DUT) ' V IE= 105.00twmw Ir 1H) /oz ze ,I.E p1 Ulf /e o-14; Ivear 4 , �, NO SCALE IE - -2� b r - -0 5l 'ipLAGm rILTEt2. r-At:31ZiG As 5HowN. GEF- t7�TAIL. ,,��^ � � q �`• • .7�- `l�/ 2 /� 5HSMT Z. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES , 4, s i`:� ��, I C� " CUT. 2540 CYD RLY � k j : •. NO. REVISION, DATE �v 1 ;`, . ° `�'Q: A C�tzc7ve s'�A�r� S •(FORME 2585) .� -;. $- `� ��.. '�'�" '=. °• 1 1�/i� �R' G-t'Y caMMEN•rS 9Jt8190 C.l� � � .x«y.••• . � FILL- 450 CYDS (FORMERLY 250) �c 2 aQevls�o pat2 crr•Y Gdt�tMENTS ibj3/9D LYE U %}j►jC0 ,t. �, y 5 At717 ciB t2 I PIP6,A00 NO?E5, 5UISMIT TO 5//91 t2EM ' 160,16 Juanita-Woodrnvll/e Way NE GARL PEARSON ti GITY or IrvMcklm Bothell, Washtngton. 98011 /'� AND * , ► r 4, `t ;.':'� 4` I�n IGIERYjt�M �� 1Z1'N o2Kt Qu�NT t `� 4 9 (206)TTS-4589 • {206J362-st24�4 • FAX{206)362�3879 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATIONS PER CITY OF EDMONDS 164th ST SW. AND 4 ' 1 C��-I' `75th PL. W. GROUNDWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM AS - BUILTS. �'5-I6-90 SURVEYNG ENGWEERM MANNING MANAGEMENT DRAWN 6Y Wm i4 6j•t l• 90 CHEOCED 9Y20il ,�•-'��Q AP.P46YE00 Y CITY OF EDMONDS WASHING 7 O N 1 OF 2 90 450( �L• s"'EMt RCtILLNEQ (i''�0 ((�G 011A/i..6 tllM 94575 R/Y1 .lo •� T `Ip � I I !© r i I 1 f I ,,,ram,, • " '' ''"''•` A--•-t /.Q I � 2" COMPT DEPTH CL'B' ASPHALT CONCRETE. ! 1 I I/z" MIN COMPT DEPTH CR '.SURFACING. TOP COURSE L ' 21/MIN COMPT' DEPTH. CR.SIIRF'ACING BASE COURSE GRAVEL CL'B' MA1''�'BE READ PER' SOIL CONDITIONS _ � ���'& C ROADWAY, SECTION. 75th PL. W. NO SCALE 'OFFSET FRAME et GRATE SO RESTRICTOR/POLLUTION DEVICE VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER LADDER TOP 134:29 ' T 'A. A. STO GALV STIL J STEPS & LADDER '•� " � 82,Cc5 _ O� w FTi NU' r?00 -'12 1 ti 10V -___ d r' J i• , 12" '• aL.+r d INV 77.24 WATERTIGHT 5145AR N GATE ASSY RESTRICTOR . PLATE W/ ORIFICE-H�b" 'A z -.vv�..vv � �nv✓r1v r nvrrt`G SCALE: 1" = 20'(H), 1" = 6'(V) CL MH BY 0.5' 1 uL01-cw ALL METAL PARTS a SURFACES TO BE GALVANIZED OR OF CORROS IOW RESISTANT MATERIAL. COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION SHALL BE AS4URED. RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED. CONTROL STRUCTURE -(CATCH BASIN # 1) SCALE: T' = 2' n ♦1 76 72 VNER / DEVELOPER: CARL PEARSON m w P.O. BOX 70525 5 201 NW, 36TH ST. GENERAL NOTES GRADING NOTES �, SEATTLE, WA. 98107 W , �0W 1. All construction shall conform to the "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge & Municipal Construction" and Standard Plans as adopted by the City of Edmonds, and any requirements 1- All site i•!ork Trust comply with chapter 70 of the uni-' established at City hearings on this plan. form building code. (1985 edition) CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 2. All construction is subject to the inspection by the City of Edmonds and the Contractor shall 2 • A grading permit issued pursuant to Title 17 SCC and notify the City of their schedule in sufficient time to permit inspection prior to and during Chapter 70 UBC a)'ld approval of the temporary erosi ' and me work• sedinentat:ion control plan shall have been obtained f rbm J 1. Arrange and attend pre -construction meeting with City the Depari:rient of Public Works for any on -site L- 3. The Contractor shall be responsible 9dJ of Edmonds Inspector. ponsible for the installation of side sewers (laterals & tees) and r which is not expressly eyenlpted by Section 7003 UBC. 2. Flag for clearing and grading, the placing of 2 x 4 markers with the length and depth of the laterals and tees inscribed on the markers and prior fo bael•�'illi 3. Erect filter fence. ' r13• •.�" .3 4. Clear and grub site. 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Edmonds Department of Public '.forks in time to permit 5. Construct interceptor drain line, eleanouts, CiB5 - inspection of the side sewers prior to backfilitng. fl CBS, and interceptor trench. Geotech Engineer shall be available for inspection during trenching, 5. Upon completion of the site improvements and underground utilities, the Contractor through his ���'''��5"""V) Consulting PIPE SPECIFICATIONS Z AO 'n installation, and backfilling, Dewatering shall be g Engineer shatt furnish an as•built plan to the City of Edmonds which indicates the O� installed if necessary. Spoil disposal shall be offsite locution of all site improvements including side sewer laterals or tees, wale.^tines or other per a truck route plan submitted by the owner to the pertinent information, 0 9 City' 6. Underground wiring required with street lighting. W S Z 6. Rough grade roadway and driveway; install rockery. - „ cc Q %. Install Storm drainage detention system. ALL PiPE TO BE CMP OR CONCRETE PiPE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. CMP TREATMENT 5 OR BETTER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED _ g y 7. Water service with meter box and curb stop required for each lot. FOR CONCRETE PIPE. `I� 8. In'stpipe ll storm drainage conveyance System: Storm BACKFILL AROUND PIPE MUST BE COMPACTED TO A SPECIFIED AASHTO T•99 DENSITY OF 90Y.. USE REASONABLE T Q pipes, CB, MH, etc. 8. The Contractor shalt arrange for and make air tests of sanitary sewer and sewer connections CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. V 8. Install other. utilities: Sanitary sewer, water service, etc, under the supervision of the City Engineer or his designated representative. Laterals to be 6" 10. Final grade for pave. Consult with Geotech for final concrete pipe, or P.V.C. conforming to SDR 3034 standards. ALL NON -PERFORATED METAL PIPE SHALL' HAVE NEOPRENE GASKETS AT THE JOINTS. 0•RiNG GASKETS'MAY BE USED FOR TYPE F BANDS. recommendations. � � � N � 11. Stabilize all exposed slopes with hydroseed and straw 9. Existing underground facilities have been shown on this drawing for the purpose of assisting GALVANIZED $TEFL CMP SHALL MEET YHE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M 36, TYPE 1 AND the contractor in locating said facilities in the field. The contractor shall be responsible TYPE 2. PIPE SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER. matting' for checking actual locations in the field and checking with appropriate agencies that may have 12. Clean up storm drainage system. underground facilities within the project limits. The contractor shall be solely responsible CORRUGATION - 2.2/3X1/2 CORRUGATi•ON • 3 X 1 13. Commence building constructionfor any damage to underground facilities resulting from his operations. A,) 4r-Ai52E 10IZ 1INJPA-riO I PIPE ARCH GAGE BAND PIPE ARCH 01) I&15TALL AOL)WIPATIOiJ WALLS ANb 10. A copy of these approved plans must be on the job site whenever construction is in progress. 1211•361, 17X13 • 42X29 16 12" y . 42"-544, 16 24" 5411.1201, ��AINA��' it. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to clean, flush, disinfect where applicable and 601, 49X33 14 24" 126"-138" 40X31 - 112X75 G.) E5TA0L,151•i r-IM1! 1,H CgIZA106- p y 6611•90" 57X38 • 64X43 12 24" 144" 117X79 - 137X87 t�) COMMENCE r1eAM►M61 ArJO FINl5H obtain satisfactory approval from the City of Edmonds regarding the quality and integrity of 96" 71X47 10 24" 142X91 existing water lines, sanitary sewer line, storm sewer line, system, etc. Written retention syst77X52 - 83X57 8 24" WDIZl�` ANNULAR RECORRUGATED ENDS OR ANNULAR CORRUGATED PIPE, 1211•84" acceptance by the City of these procedures must be transmitted to the design engineer. DIAMETER, TYPES B,D & F, TO HAVE 12" BAND, GAGE SAME AS PIPE. 12. Approved storm sewer materials are as follows: A) Concrete rubber gasketed joints. CORRUGATED ALUMINUM PIPE AND C UPLING 6ANDS BALL M B) Galy. helical as M196 AND M797. EET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTC ph. coated treatment 1 sleet 16 ga, or better gasketed. C) Helical aluminwn 16 ga, gasketed. I .CORRUGATION 2.2/3X1/2 CORRUGATION 3 X 1 PIPE ARCH GAGE AGGE BAND PIPE ARCH •s_*Jb&"4feJe 12"•271, 17X13 42X29 16 12" 36l"•60" t°� O% '�'i 30"•36" 2SX20 35X24 14 21" 66"•72" �' � g' ,e TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES 42" 54" 42X29 49X33 12 21" 78"•96" 60X46 12X75 ���'4'�'`• 60" 57X38 64X43 10 24" 106" • 144" 103X71 •112x75 ' n„V� SPIRAL RIB PIPE sA 18•42" 16 12,, 48,,.601, 14 21" 8 p� n6^10 66n•84" 12 21" ftSSA:i�'+ m@ rg 1. APPROVAL OF !HIS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF DESIGN, ANNULAR RECORRUGATED ENDS OR ANNULAR CORRUGATED PIPE, 1219•841, "`"u�'•����� �� SIZE, NOR LOCATION OF PIPES, RESTRiCTORS, CHANNELS, OR RETENTION FACILITIES, BUT IS AN APPROVAL OF DIAMETER, TYPES 8,D & F, TO HAVE 12" BAND, GAGE SAME AS PIPE. 4 THE TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ONLY. THE SILTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING ARE SUCH AS TO MEET MINIMUM COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND EON�RNTEo IAAS AASHTO NAND LESON H(8A6STCl.ASS 2TRANDSTRENGTH) ASHALL EM LAINfAAND RCONFORM To TTHE EXPECTED (SEASONAL) CONDITIONS DICTATE, MORE. SILTATION CONTROL FACILITIES MAY 8E REQUIRED TO INSURE JOINTS, UNLESS SPECIFIED PTHERWISE. CONC RETE PiPE 24" DJA AND LARGER (ASTM C76, CLASS 2) GASK BE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE PROPOSED PLAT. THEREFORE, DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTiOn fi REINFORCED AND CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M•170. 1 SHALL 6E THE 03LIGATIC!t AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONO1T10+lS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ' 2. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES HOT ENT:R THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION -PRIOR iO CLEARING p AND GUILDlHG CONSTRUCTION, AND SATISFACTORILY NAiNTA1NE0 UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING ARE is ��kj - '''•iqi �!• M1 C0 COMPLETED At;; POTENTIAL FOR OH -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED, i + X 3. TEMPORARY EOS10N SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES ­1L •• 2 � IE h 1�1 1 I CCS,�2 CE34 1c�rt� g-- St•'t) DETENTION SYSTEM PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 20'(H), T' = 4'(V) NOTE: 1 u6rrALLATIo►J of: eto>c KF�{Y s'LL 60MI 0r k!1rH Gffo-TECH RZEPoRT . s I sple.GTIOW OF:Pr_IZF. PiPE IZ eq.)r „ �pF Pt2ra� `r'o F3AGl��IL.L. BATrF Tip py • ••/%mac �CDtQy`9! "'\.\ t ��71 .-.�• 'g .a -I . 8" MIN. TVAICKNESS OF 4-"-Z" QUARRY SPAL,tS I" MINUS WASHED ROCK; L{" PERF, pipe! FILTER FA13R L e,E CONSTRUCTED BY PLACING SILTATION CONTROL ! `•`'' j Z m FILTERS AROUND SWALES (NATURAL OR MANMADE) AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL jt :•, „ SUCH TIME THAT LAND CLEARING AND/OR C04STRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE COMPLETED, OPEERATiONAL, AND THEN RETURNED TO ORIGINAL GROUND CONDITIONS. TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROL FILTERS I w • C�j SHALL BE APPROVED FILTER FABRICS 2' TALL. ••' ''.. � O 4. BERMS AND SWALES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY TO DiRECT ALL SEDIMENT LADEN 6'ATER TO iIATURAL '� � '�4 VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. DISCHARGE FROM CUTOFF SWALES SHALL BE DIRECTED TO DISPERSE INTO NATIVE $L� ry •��s+I,a 11 I4 e, g VEGETATION 0ti•SITF.. !° , Ne �.� 1 i�/ ►?y'� Owaa "� 1 O 3 5. VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON AREAS DISTURBED OR ON AREAS OF CONSTRUCTICI: IS NECESSARY TO '��1 Go ~ MINIMIZE EROSION. AREAS TO BE ROUGH GRADED WITH FINISHED GRADING TO FOLLOW NEAR PROJECT COMPLETION . ARE TO BE.SE-DED WITH ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYE GRASS. THIS ALSO INCLUOES PERIMETER DIKES A110 THE SEDIMENT BASIN EMBAi(KMENT. HYOROSEED PREFERRED. 6. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AP.( -.A" AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND s 4M R MULCHiNG. HYOROSEc"0 PREFERRED. ti ...,•. y W 7. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FiNiSH G.^.AOi!!G, PERMANENT VEGETATION (CONSISTING OF RAPID, PERSISTENT AND W W LEGUME) WILL SE APPLIED (MIN. 80 LB/AQ . THIS IS TO INCLUDE: l 4z V 20ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYE GRASS U, 4�% CREEPING RED FESCUE " FILTER FABRIC 4^`/. WHITE CLOVER W/• WIRE MESH z IIYOROSEED PREFERRED. �.�•". 2 X 4 DOUGLAS F Ir` W 6) 3/4" MIN DIA WASHED No I .GRADE OR EQUAL „�� a 0 8. FRE111P•ATI24 OF SURFACE: ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ALT•-STL FENCE POST Ef:G!NEER. TFIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DISCING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS.GRAVEL EA SIDE EPT.L !:FR: SHALL BE APPLIED AT 400k PER ACRE OF 10.20.20 (Jo POUNDS PER 1100 GeUARE FEET) OR F,OUIVALE41. 41 CEMENT' CONE CL 'B' WALK CEMENT v\Y 2 /, CONC GL'B' U o SECTION v. _ ; ty; FILTER FABRI 140N � ` N • • a y °•• OR EQUAL ATTACHTTACH W/ • y y f STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS „ „ 2 x2 xl4GA WIRE to MESH OR EQUAL IT ��• I I -- i t l l . VERTICAL CURB SECTION Ll NO SCALE T BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC 4 0 C IN 8"x 12" TRENCH TYP FILTER FENCE DETAIL • NO SCALE Z4" ti I2" ASPHALT CONC 2%_ PAVEMENT Z I 2% 0 SLOPE O pt./FT I MAINTENANCE: The entrance shall be maintained in a q condition which will tracking or flow - `D Q prevent of mud onto _ public rights -of -way. This may require periodic top •" W "• ' "' dressing with 2-inch stone, as conditions demand, and repairLL and/6r clia-anout of any structures used to Arap sediment: o 000 ,. ° o' 3 All materials spilled, dropped,, washed or' tracked from o o . �; Q. • '6' ti 'o • ° ' 6i °$ o8'a vehicles onto roadwa t t _ 4t-Co" Ii _l�l'�TE SIMIL-AtZ t��^t,o�tt ppLIE Y or in o s orm drains must be removed immediately. �. PAY LIMITS 6XCAVAYI(JN ONLY TO EA S-r SI I%E• z9ve I-e5NP1 l `j GOV2•`r- MAXIMUM lZ.OL.K•ClZ-( h" NEIGNTs f . 'CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL -., THICKENED EDGE SE CTION � ROCKERY DETAIL NO* SCA-CE -NO. SCALE SHEET NO. 2 OF 2 NO SCALE JOB NO., 90 - 4506 !>A-rIC E 5EC. 5 . fWP 27 RGE. 4 F. W M. qU of HERc ULr. NEQ DMF .. FILM 94575 11® 11S IIC loC 10 75 RAIV L R/W 1 - '•,:: 20 1 20' I I I • ... ._-°..1�: _..�2"T say : i � '''"`..:�..a_. A 2" COMPT DEPTH CL'B' , ASPHALT � CONCRETE.. 1 11/Y" MIN COMPT DEPTH CR '.SURFACING. TOP COURSE ' 21/x MIN CO.MPT' DEPTH CR :SURFACING. BASE COURSE GRAVEL CL'B' MAY `BE* REOD P8A SOIL GONDITIONS . ROADWAY, , SECTION. r 75ih " . PL... �,_ NO _SCALE • 1 OFFSET FRAME,& GRATE SO RESTRICTOR/POLLUTION DEVICE VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING AND DIRECTLY OVER LADDER TOP Sq:29 I STD GALV STL STEPS a LADDER or 83Z Cn5 T 112 ' (z- 121, 1 N /I ki V AAA 1 -� INV 77.24 WATERTIGHT 51-15AR z GATE ASSY -"-- N RESTRICTOR PLATE --- W/ ORIFICE_jb" A' X N Z� P. ACCESS -,ROAD PROFILE 51(v) , r IL MH 5Y ,0-95' I NOTES ALL METAL PARTS a SURFACES TO BE GALVANIZED OR OF CORROSION' RESISTANT MATERIAL. COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION SHALL BE ASSURED. RESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE SHARP EDGED, SHOP DRILLED. CONTROL STRUCTURE. (CATCH BASIN # 1) SC ILE: 1" = 2' ` NNER / DEVELO PER: CARL PEARSON rA P.O. BOX 70525 - GENERAL 201 NW `36TH ST` TOTES'._.__" f r 'OTESEATTLE,WA. 98;107S.B.ARINQc° I 1 All construction shall conform to the "Standard specifications for Road, Bridge & Municipal in v i Construction" and Standard Plans as adopted by the City of Edmonds, and arty requirements 1 :A'll site �[or;ti 'must comply with ..'chapter ,70 ' of the •unJ « .'" { established at City hearings on this plan, form biiildin code l S (1985.; edition) CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ! 2. All construction is subject to the inspection by the City of Edmonds and the Contractor shall P 2. A grading permit issued pursuant to 'Title 17 SCC• and l notify the City of their schedule in sufficient time to permit inspection prior to and during p Chapter ter 70 UBC and a the Work• "royal of the temporary er )siolh and . sedimentation control + i 1. Arrange and attend pre -construction meeting wit f� City plan shall have been obtained 'Prom the Department, of Pixblic Works for any on -site grading.;-' of Edmonds Inspector. 3. The contractor snail be responsible Which is not expressly exempted by Section 7.003 UBC. .. p ponsible for the installation of side sewers (laterals & tees) and j 2. Flag for clearing and grading. i the placing of 2 x 4 markers with the length and depth of the laterals and tees iiscribed on the 3. Erect filter fence. i markers, and prior to bacH¢illir�. 4. Clear and grub site. 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Edmonds Department of Public Works in time to permit 5. Construct interceptor drain line, eleanouts, CI35 - inspection of the side sewers prior to backfilling. - CB8, and interceptor trench. Geotech Engineer shall - be available for inspection during trenching, 5. Upon e p g g, po ompletion of the site improvements and underground utilities, the Contractor through his ur . Z Installation, and backfilling. Dewatering shall be Consulting Engineer shall furnish an as -built plan to'the City of Edmonds which indicates the rt' .K installed if necessary. Spoil disposal shall be offsite location of all site improvements including side sewer laterals or tees, waterlines or other PIPE SPECIFI T10N5 OZ � � ' ` `" ZI per a truck route plan submitted by the owner to the pertinent Information. fl 6. Rough grade roadway and driveway; install rockery.' 6. underground wiring required with street lighting, W 7. Install storm drainage detention system. 4 + °C i- p ALL PIPE TO BE CMP OR CONCRETE PIPE, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. CMP TREATMENY 5 OR BETTER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. _ 7. Water service with meter box and curb stop required for each lot. FOR CONCRETE PIPE. 8. Install storm drainage conveyance system: storm - . ' ` BACKF[LL AROUND PIPE MUST BE COMPACTED TO A SPECIFIED AASHTO T•99 DENSITY OF 90%. USE REASONABLE F- pipes, CB, MH, es: ( 8. The Contractor shall arrange for end make air tests of sanitary sewer and sewer connections CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. j V 9. Install other utilities: Sanitary sewer; waterservieeletc. under the supervision of, the City Engineer or his designated representative. Laurels to be 611 10. Final grade for pave. Consult With Geoteeh for final concrete pipe, or P-V-C. conforming to SOR 3034 standards. ALL NOR -PERFORATED METAL PIPE SHALL' HAVE NEOPRENE GASKETS AT THE JOINTS. 0•RiNG GASKETS'MAY BE USED recommendations. FOR TYPE F BANDS. t 11. Stabilize all exposed slopes With hydroseed and straw 9 Existing underground facilities have been shown on this drawing for the purposc of .assisting 1 matting. `the contractor in locating said facilities in the field. The contractor shall be res ons;ble GALVANIZED STEEL CMP•SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M 36, TYPE 1 AND z + N for checking actual locations in the field and checking with appropriate agencies that may have TYPE 2: PIPE SHALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER. 12. Clean up storm drainage system. I underground facilities within the 13. Commence building Construction. protect limits. The contractor shall be solely responsible CORRUGATION - 2.2/3X1/2 CORRUGATION 3 X 1 for any damage to underground facilities resulting from his operations. .�; PIPE LCI GAGE BAND PIPE ARCH 10. A copy of these approved plans must be on the Job site whenever construction is in progress. } 1211•36" 17X13 - 42X29 16 1211 4211.54" 16 24" 5411 12011 11. It shall be the res ?F 6011 49X33 14 241, . 12611.138t1 4OX31 112X75 ponsibility of the contractor to clean, flush, disinfect where r. ticable and 6611•901, 57X38 64X43 12 241, 1441, 117X79 - 137X87 - obtain satisfactory 'approval from the City of Edmonds regarding the quality and integrity of 96" 71X47 10 24" 142X91 existing wafer lines, sanitary sewer line, storm sewer line, retention system, rtc. Written 77X52 - 83X57 8 24P S G� - Hr aceeptarice by the City of these procedures must be transmitted to the design engin<er, ANDIAMETERCOTYPESTB,DED E$ F,NDS TO HAVEAI2°OBAND CORRUGATED PIPE, 12"•841, ' J i , _ AME AS,PiPE. 12. Approved storm sewer materials are as follows: A) Concrete rubber gasketed joints. B) Galy. helical asph. Coated treatment 1 steel 16 ga. or better gasketed. CORf'rAT96 AHD Wt M197yfED ALUMINUM PIPE AND COUPLI pANDS SHALL ,MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF WHT0 M7 C) Hellcat aluminum 16 ga, gasketed. - i CORRUGATION 2.2/3X1/2 CORRUGATION 3 X 1 + f PIPE ARC( GATGE BAND PPE � 30u.36" 28 20 42X29 16 1211 36H.60-1 ® 11. 11 X 35X24 14 2111 661' 721' ��0 TEMPORARY EROSIION CO TROL- OTE i' 42".54" 42X29 - 49X33 12 2 1, 78n•96n 60x46 195X672X75 0 � �,� 6011 57X38 64X43 10 24" 106a 144" 103X71 •112X75 {r / SPIRAL RiB PIPE $9 ' 18!1.4211 A' _ 16 1211 48"_6011 14 211, 1. APPROVAL OF THIS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL 'OF DESIGN, * 66�'•84'i 12 21„ I SIZE, NOR LOCATION OF PIPES, ANNULAR RECORRUGATED ENDS OR ANNULAR CORRUGATED PiPE, 1211•841, ' i RESION ONT CHANNELS, OR RETENTION FACiL1T1ES, BUi 13: AN APPROVAL OF - lr If1AMETER; TYPES B,D & F, TO HAVE 121, SAND, GAGE SAME AS PIPE. ! THE TEMPORARY EROSION 'SEDIMENTATiDN, CONTROL PLAN ONLY. THE SILTATION CONTROL S,'STEMS DEPICTED ON THiS DRAWING ARE '.SUCH AS TO: MEET .MINIMUM COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. AS CONSTRUCT[' AND CONCRETE PIPE 2111 DIA AND. LESS (ASTM C14 EXTRA STRENGTH) SHALL BE PLAIN AND CONFORM TO THE sit EXPECTED (SEASONAL) CONDITIONS DICTATE, MORE SILTATION CONTROL FACILITiES,MAY BE tEQUIRED 70 INSURE r J.OiNTS, UNLESS SPECIFIED -0THERWISE. REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M•86, CLASS 2, AND TO DESIGNATION M-198 FOR RUBBER GASKETED COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE PROPOSED PLAT. THEREFORE,. DURING. THE COURSE GO'CONSTRUCTiON IT + REINFORCED.AND CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M-170. SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO ADDRESS ANY NEW COND'TIONS.THAT MAY BE CONCRETE PIPE 24" DIA AND LARGER (ASTM C7b, CLASS 2) SHALL BE CREATED, BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OVER. AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT A-1 AGENT PROPERTIES. , 1 } 2. .PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER } DOES.NOT,ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING I AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ANTI LANDSCAPING ARE 1-4 OHAS PASSED. COMPLETED iND POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION -30 1 3. TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIME1lTATiON CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL DE CONSTRUCTED BY PLACING SILTATION CONTROL ty •L", nep � bf Q FILTERS AROUND SWALES (NATURAL OR MANMADE) AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATiSFACTO"T CONDITION UNTIL r't ?" at � Y= 8 SUCH TIME THAT LAND CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACiLITI-S �;,`, "� ��" ARE CCf6PLETED, ' ' i QD OPERATIONAL, AND THEN RETURNED TO ORIGINAL GROUND CONDITIONS. TEMPORARY SILTATI[:' f } y lr O CONTROL FILTERS } SHALL BE APPROVED FILTER FABRICS 2' TALL. 4. BERMS AND SWALES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY TO DIRECT ALL SEDIMENT LADEr 1 I e VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. DISCHARGE FROM CUTOFF SWALES SHALL BE DIRECTED TO DI r SER !N JNHATiVE �s O i I Iw h z 14 VEGETATION UN•StTE. ® �er•�TE: , ^ Icl �. x p 5. VEGETATION SHALL .BE ESTABLISHED ON AREAS DISTURBED OR ON AREAS OF'CONSTRUCTIOk AS NECESSARY TOcr 0. MINIMIZE EROSION. AREAS TO BE ROUGH GRADED WiTH FINISHED GRADING TO FOLLOW NEAR i,,OJECT COMPLETION, i } ARE .TO BE ,SEEDED WITH ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYE GRASS. THIS ALSO INCLUDES P::RIMETER DIKES AND i ' THE SEDIMENT BASIN EMBANKMENT. HYDROSEED PREFERRED. iJ i 4 13 4 6, STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREA^ AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMP('YARY SEEDING AND �IT EN INEE � ; } MULCHING. HYDROSEED PREFERRED, b W m t N tl to 7. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH G8ADR10,'PERMANENT VEGETATION (CONSISTING OF RAPID, PERSISTENT AND l 'k!to W LEGUME)WILL BE APPLIED (MIN. 80 LB/AC). THIS IS TO INCLUDE: I Chi r+ 'R ' 20% ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYE GRASS a 40% CREEPING RED FESCUE:40 F FILTER FABRIC p WHITE CLOVER HYDROSEED PREFERRED. W/• WIRE,MESH �- I __-- 2 x 4 DOUGLAS FIR . ? 8., PREPARATION OF SURFACE: ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE 3/4' MIN DIA WASHED No I GRADE OR EQ.UAL ; t9 i ENGINEER. THIS MAY DE ACCOMPLISHED BY DISClNG, RAKINGy NARROWING OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS. GRAVEL EA SIDE ALT-STL FENCE POST a ,a FERTILIZER: SHALL BE APPLIED AT 4009 PER ACRE OF 10.20.20.(10 POUNDS PER' 1100 SQUARE FEET) OR EQUIVALENT. . CEMENT CONC CL �B' WALK 51/2" IN II m N 3 CEMENT 2I/ CONC CL `t3` I I \Y' •�: •Y � :A •6' - SECTION o d //• / FILTER FABRIC-MIRAFI 140N' d Y 1. OQUAL ATTACH W/ c0� STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS 11 •7 2 x2°xl4 GA WIRE >y d �? MESH OR EQUAL 4 II II to.. N I I y I I• 7 __DETE T_ 101M .__ ('' STE _.,._PR_C FILE ,Cq ai I I VERTICAL S.ECT1®. 0 Z :cry NO S.CALE r BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC 4TYP'OC. N 8"x 12" TRE0 NCH s . <' NO'1'fE: ..106TALLATI6I•1OF' 2oGKFj'Zy 51-IC\LL. /� �, z:, AMPLY kllTH GEC TECH NZEPvRT �` FILTER FENCE DETAIL s WSPI✓CTIOW or PEI2.F Prp� � � ''NO SCALE I� F Petc . To 93)1,Chr-ILL. / /r---- G- l BA.1 F-P, 5 FZbAp 8" MIN. THICKNESS OF 42"- 2" gVARRY SPALLS v6� I I" MINUS WASHED ROGK1 7 l I \ 4". PERF. PIPES E o2- FILTER FABRIC •4 G I PAY LIMITS EXCAVATION ONL,•(, 1 ROCKERY DETAIL _ NO ;ALE 92 I W es . W-M- n:- nel'1 I CAI 1 C-ryf=P jr- E4 ) Z 0 _Zcri I A [ 8" MIN `�� «• i „ t r DEPTH. a sm 4 6 SPALLS i I 0 2° ASPHALT CONC U I t 2 /o_ PAVEMENT !D MAINTENANCE: The entrance shall be maintained" 'in a ` I . condition which will prevent :tracking or clew of •- mud onto 1O k ' • . ' ' • • - -� public origins -of -way. This may require periodict:.1 e. .r 1 « 1 dressing. with.'2-inch stone, as Condit"ions demand, and repa:.r - i�1i and/.or,' al�anolit of any structures ,rased •to. `Ira sediment.' p` L All :.;:materials spilled, dropbed., washed or' tracked r<r o 0 0 vehicles 'onto roadwayf. m t o. a o, a o o 'o or into must_ be removed . immediately. , r CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETA:11' _ _ THICKENED EDGE S E C T I O N SHEET NO.: NO SCA'U - 2OF2 ..,.,,.1i' I loot`'�1�1'I-Zc7V e}� _ JOB NO. ' 90 - 4506 • -- �ai amaoiren�®1.enwn. _- DA'r1- 89228 ; \ 11%0L4 > &!k_ ' As 61aolA/fJ i � is�.,,,�t� �•'t'A l t� ` +" r' , \�yr � i is tric.G". -rrl. \V.. ��• \. / t /' - �n i ! (GKb1'2x•r D l°C UI �' ' �.1� AREA 1'CA1l,J `T �X ® `°0fr • ri ,1 f Op � � , tiv6 "ro , 10 �� N,. Tr- _ . 2Z , _ _. _.. _ - �L e � i pe g Ir'OR � ,..ID �% gb°7• / vti �� ............. r� Qp C.t�T.IiC 4." 6f?W*44I P RGL'K 2. f.OP9F'.aG'"fE.t� ��, / i��.. 1 A M %"t�PG�t,tf W �� r+ ,i+�'�y(�!�'� ,,:.w"' �, : �/ '"+�U'��1�►t'J{ir ' �1 � � w C „� •. y �� ��' l �� SUi2� OF' C.OUt25�• �AWGUT N�rr EV4r.ACCESS , r a ' . E�,+r- C)r N C E �- lilt I�•.+r _ MA•rc 4 TD — E ® C n OAD S�+a C�""* , A ,� ;3;a p.�9, p� , ... fir, d.tt o r," es.c7tg t�rtY tip $ q•D T 3�1r�..D ±.._::: sH�f: At NO :SCALE /IMF e� ,9Z + �• +..-.. ,+ , 1 . • f ., \ + w z �...- ,. , . .., . Invert of mterce tw drain give : 0 ,,�� , s ; : � .,,.,.._ r...•. . , ;, . p.d �s ii roximate onl :cnd shalt be su' 'e + q , ti. . , .. PP ! ct .o the exuct � �. a ,. ,,, ;':., . ,: h th hidbe .formation' e ,, '' :' � , � . , •. P W.. Y. . A g otech shall be retained to observe c yf i l7 ; , onditions in; _. thtl'trenc}t'ruHn �. �+ „t d consiruc i ♦ 3 ton r 1i g 1 r , �t , i �•�'' / ., ,,. � :. , :; ram ��� cruel 11J G' 1 M ,s. }r� aft r u � G i J 0 r/'•ie/1 - V r , A t fa Id �• j � �5 a �,r +ti i +a- LU TD f3G . �, Y , < � t� Iv • x, r fr ��-.��,,• 1- 'ti •Eo 1 t s, Q •'t. L C • a VCR b .---- • ;� •••, rA �s �$ ,a =, 1 •�'i. LT ��;.3 �• ttr' n �-'(sT) d F1 Lim a n 12" t:P +05 w �. i�, +�.q• �,� . y''� /, �' -% • ' ^•Yw fir p [' j1r a t t.i' - I 'i• ♦.%S "n, �1 41 it '<�'& '•'tt' / •.J �R r %/ �!; ij /,,i'•: ' .+,•"� _ . i 1"` d ' - - - - - - K (J k� •/ , � r �, �` � /JJ • \, � ! (ju` ///�/ 11 W � t` a �y,�� f 1d �G. /., .. � •'" t � (I ah ? 5'°�;3. x � �? I ,�z • • _ Be r. Ott'; t7li 14 g ��M 1 / / iµ 1� ..✓ �y ,/�� / �, :i, 0 1 �F-iRJfj ��`It . �RA�� -Ib .• -� Ott: J — .1 17�u Ji +l ASP � /y/�►{yr�� �- .�, r•f ,�/"' � � ' � ,~ i ; .- - fa vGl.. 1 11 SP � 1 ark r,ti� / � _V VIS; i F- 12 sD , I�t 4' 4 \ t 5x 1�' d* t', .. ,•,•,ri..r� ��"' �' ,r5 a . tln`yi ..... 2 4-1LT "'♦ ►� �1 -' _ \ " ' 1 • ! • ,\ • p• •• . - ,,��A r+r „`:°Ea si '�„; Q `°�'. w.' "'�.• .r.� 1 • - � �' �t- t // - \i <)" !%� •i. i i 1 �'� r ' I� IX� L' ' .. A➢•V- # N Ja e#. ..'n�;' ,'3. r \�..: •__ r+rr r.iw rr.r.rr 1 •art'' 1 .. • - , . KJ�I' `'i 'tj , 05 ��C m Y � 4. 1 �y'�r �.,r x} ,1:' 1 '. , ark r,:,', _ 11• J%, � ""^•","'l vhl M , 1 � 5 i. +r' Y1k, 3r. -.. +',frw i .>. a r t . ., r r��� , ::'. ,,.,, r ,,;x,,. „ .,o-„ » i x :..; ' Y +x.• FEU w s � „nY•4, �{ - �I ED y r I , �,, :... 1 . .. 5 .. , 1 Nr .. ... .'.- Y .. ,. e : , k r . ..,, ., . ,ttv, , , t,. :,w.:, , ,,. ..? .,+1 „ .. t V/i .., i .$:. .. .,, r .t .-.,, ,.,, , ,W 6. ,it ..,+,„ $i A e. .r %i. ,a' ., P iA. .... .... .. ..., .,. t .. n. .,.� � a;�?' }y .. .:,.:i .:, .. 1 u.. .., 5� h ,.c. .w°, .'� .. a 1, t. f :., .: F. s a � a M; r, ., =.5 :. .. r, ., r. ...,- ..: ... . I 1 (hb I .. .... ?.T.s '.t sY... ,.Y.t. .. .=,i;•, .... :a:'.. x., ., �k .d ?°' ,al''S 2 +r » +; t r >- ';, , . a,: , � zxY ,Y�, . ., ....., ,,,�v,.; , , m „t.e r N# ��' •••• IZr- 2 A • -.. ., ,,,.. ;y' ( ,n ,. , �*y.: »x ..; r » : ii � ',t `.;;,xC'�.. � Y F ,�, .; i ,. {it ,t. ..,.,J ,-.x 1"k` V• , i >, r 4 Y ,a. yr , : � r� i � , w r r • t i /: , ;' + w �+Fr ., ,, r; ' . , ..... ,r,r� x,,..�,Y _.,a, ; , .- 'i 1`t' NOTtes ME HOD OF DRAIN � T INSTALLATION AND TR�NCH SIDEWALL , A RE S THE SPONSI ILITY O P P THE CONThtACTOR STABILITY 1 12 S�• 1� ; JJ u,4 1..9 ! ,,.. ... .., ., ., . ,.. 5E> GE07ECH R .., ... ..,,.. , ,, , . ,.,.. -.:,. $, a.. . , ... . ,... r..r ,...,.,... EPORT'T•339 DATEDAUGUST r. gY TER 1 'r 1 b. C "4 , ifl t 1 1 w, Y, GL: t '1 a 1 i A AA `lam. :� , �' , ,:.. .. t' , c �S _ E !� T �7Y nw „ • 1 .j to I TEC T" TRH H �„� TO yt- �, SECTION T ' ir�•I.I-I� r if �''I��. t , J , \ , t, _ r r T'i VTJ�.i. ✓'V uCrlr7i I,} Ivy{✓ �,.�� Y. 'tV✓ - .. - O S - a J2 KT'tgri�INrt a ^�, I SCALE s CCU:. n . rr .� IFIN I•.,oCaifa1.1 1 s 1 .r ��+ t!%.�J r P� 1 • t^ S 's _ .� I Cum glo 6 (�l1F,y (lJfc;f3 Ai.IU !! �p"� r` -- Tti iC&U& �•,. till �UTi�1 �-i ! �' i�a Lv aC F-51�T. D _.Tl-iI ! � E .�Ay� ;1 <`� i 'LD' 1 UT1LITY 1: SEFir-uT %3u i �ca�cple �e i / J� A ` ,;11 , ct ®pt w «�v'� ,01 I::Crr / LAVT ?. � o ^ ts. a "® erg .. \O10 b b� cf; / YtS 4J1 .. vh h _ _ •... ,,�t7� \0 - '•} I - .I , - %'� bl, 4 T Y p y+ 270 O —� _ Veer 'rz"'a �boo 1laWTLIIs C•t1`fF.�. 1� iN4" Pip. tr'I'E. ;�i ti''g\ti L•t' �; } f:1, 1 �. SEE G'f� M •� ti aLA CJ 41(\ o , ��y, .ti L-tlVt\•1 C�+.1 fl�l Cti \�i to bt�T7>\IL.� oe o � MDF\ � � •. * rr .oz.tro �\ ' �.! qt,1 20 � i Cbt./tPr DE;''1-i G1, a ,�•�1•i CDI,.1C,; �c. 94.05 /7°Our - ItIr20W x `eaf; /5"/r./ 817tt/tluPtir ' _ I\1 COt\l1t-T t f: G! \ ;. I�fH YZ Lli¢,�GII.lG7 Tl3F' �'M GRAI P1 n �1�E ('5/g Mt y,,IUS) 13�YDNC� NI1w CaAr-T DEI�Ti-•1 c r �i, lt.l� ICE v \ 4 COL.It�G.(1t/i' MINUS) k �'8 �r 16 4th ST. (NOT, OPEN) ' x�,° IIr`�- I Cis gB„ ) °2�- 4S LJI ✓' a `eLN Llp + ACCESS ....130AD SECTION 07.1 `our 4 amwrmr E = `77QCa5 1A e7.re /z''.'N �; 1 i pLAC.�. �fLT�t'Z �AL►i�:IG _ � -' -� - -- - NO AS SHcowN. SF_p• t7�TAIL SHISVT Z. THWO I ��T�T�E �O�a ,�16,311 7s PG w �at ! Cdill`i'= (�• r�vtIo�u' szA I BY : �•• �,: 4 - O Y ' R "T F!�N FILL- '. �� ' ��� _ vex �,-ram,• e ii&� tARL PEARSON; OWNER bEVELO ER CA L PE WORMERLY '�� r? t �.V15Eb p� ciTY GbMM �.I�1T3 101. 190 i r.R AR54N s' p ,At�k7"ftlD1't:5 SU�MI T �"J s 2 �Et� l I ysvo` Jug. t' ` 1�.b, B0� 70525 I r � �Ylio�rdJr,vJJJe 1Na .N� * ; .. ! e> Gi`t'Y` 4�' �C?M0�lbS •i7�R .,. i Bvth�J� N�sJ tit Vt_E 1 sJrrgton..$tY9i't: 20`� NW. 36TH _ , . � AY•1ONS PER Ci�'lfi_ � x r ,,: � .,• ��' •► ::., ' , i � sIK'� t�N l�car�• '�.tifn•t15 �o�J ;. ,.. DTI _ Vi4..�f,.47�. 1 t.vV.Vi.f�tCJ \. voe.. <t •r L �a�.Ke •Y �tMrvr�C7 .T two ' t 17T5 4581 • 20t+ :�ii2 , SEATTLE WA. 98'107 � � � �x�4 Fax ans �s t s> �r .. , ;_ GRa DNidWAT R. C+OL� ECT Or Y - r t' ���9GRADING, ,", .„A RU1LT• .� , S I8 �oS PLAN . " •r S V ENttlEi;42Jt t1R t31f�fG am_ fl © vvt ti x f f Ill' ' onennnc r 94575 r 50` VERTICAL C.V2Vi✓ G12 r + < NDCIST'ILIG-� N S Q o Q 1�ZoFbSE•D C-6�P1=. v F. CID 10 TE > _ i� = 105. 00 ± ` N 0 + 0 ° _ Il�ls"t'ALL PIPE 4' P�•iZFoP.�-fE� A�1D PEA eal'AVEL IE = 95.02IZ'' 60i4rIEM yam• rl�oH eoq it x : t_ oN 5,rr a Z 8 cA 0 0 I� 1� / BAalGrI L4, 9 o/ / F� G1 Ev = TECH MPoei- DATF.,D tt _ . 0. o.° °/ 19 ,� /� TE = 93.31 1 E = 2)o. o3 ,, TF_ = 91.19 I E = 88.19 / O 1• 2 -rE= E53.55. `77. 1-7 ' '•, � ICY SEE 17�•TAI !, I3EL.Ok1, R/W . I r' •' `r: 20' • I I r n .G C ECG 4 //�y�,_�Glf` ... _ •.l, ~ _a_ .rj=.',,.cam=: •` ' !•� `4:1�•.'.�•'g_._'__• ;� , �', • .. ''I .J .��* ,�•�,�" 2" COMPT DEPTH CL'B'. ASPHALT CONCRETE, I I I I/z" MIN COMPT DEPTH CR ',SURFACING. TOP COURSE L I 21/z MIN COMPT DEPTH- CR.SURFACING BASE COURSE r „ GRAVEL CL'B' MAY.•'BE REQO PAR'• SOIL CONDITIONS ROADWAY SECTION, 75th � PL. W. 'NO SCALE OFFSET FRAME,a GRATE SO RESTRICTOR/POLLUTION DEVICE VISIBLE AT EDGE OF OPENING "ll TOP 6 :29 i AND DIRECTLY OVER LADDER o 1-0 a, STD GALV STL ' STEPS a LADDER or 87�,Ce5 12" 94 I d, V SO-45 �95 d to ACCESS. SCALE: 1" = 20'(I-1), 1" = 5'(V) C�mH ey,0.5' 1 INV 77.2-4 NOTES WATERTIGHT SNvAm a z ; ,� ALL METAL PARTS a SURFACES TO BE GATE ASSY --"' GALVANIZED OR OF CORROSION•RESISTANT ' MATERIAL. COMPLETE CORROSION PROTECTION SHALL BE ASSURED, RESTRICTOR PLATE ' ', --'�' NESTRICTOR ORIFICE TO BE SHARP EDGED, W/ ORIFICE-f 3b" SHOP DRILLED, A N i CONTROL STRUCTURE (CATCH BASIN #��„ SCALE: V = 2' 92 84 • 5w 76. 72; OWNER / DEVELOPER: CARL PEARSON m F 1- P.O. BOX 70525 --- - i4L NOTES' - 201 NW. 36TH ST. .:GENERAL ES' f GRADING . NOTES SEATTLEF WA. 98107 F- UJ �{ 1� All construction shall conform to the "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge $ Municipal s iA 6� Construction" and Standard Plans as adopted by the City of Edmonds, and any requirements 1 • Ail Sit:6 ' S•Iork Trust Comply I-lith chapter 70 of the un' L - established at City hearings on this plan. 7. form building code. (1985. edition) CONSTRUCTIONSE( .I1�UENCE 2. All construction is subject to the Inspection by the City of Edmonds and the Contractor shall 2 • A grading permit issued pursuant to Title 17 SCC and V V the work.notify sedimentation control plan shall have been obtained froV1 the City of their schedule in sufficient time to permit inspection prier to and during Chapter 70 UBC and approval of the temporary erosi(Ai and �-- 1. Arrange and attend pre construction meeting with City i, the Department of Public works for any on -site graclingI of Edmonds Inspector. 3• The Contractor shall be responsible for the installation of side sewers (laterals $ tees) and which is not expressly exempted by Section 7003 UBC.;', 2. Flag for clearing and grading. the placing of 2 x 4 markers with the length and depth of the laterals and tees imcribed on the markers, and prior to bacI,-Fillirn9. 3. Erect filter fence. ' � >z 4. Clear and grub site. 4. The Contractor shall notify the City of Edmonds Department of Public Works in time to permit 5. Construct interceptor drain line, cleanouts, CIB5 - inspection of the side sewers prior to backfilling. it C138, and Interceptor trench: Geotech engineer shall i be available for inspection during trenching, 5. Upon completion of the site i 9 p g g mprovements and underground utilities, the Contractor through his _PIPE' • installation, and baekfilling. DeWatering shall be Consulting Engineer shall furhish an as -built plan to the City of Edmonds which indicates the -_., SPECIFICATIONS. o� Installed If necessary. Spoil disposal shall be offsite location of all site improvements including side sewer laterals or tees, waterlines or other per a truck route plan submitted by the owner to the pertinent information.y City' 6, Underground wiring required with street lighting. W 11) y Z 6. Rough grade roadway and driveway; install rockery.' - e 4.. F IL p %. Install storm drains a detentions stem. ALL PIPE TO BE CMP OR CONCRETE PIPE; EXCEPT AS SHOWN. CMP TREATMENt 5 OR BETTER MAY BE SUBSTITUTED R_ g Y 7. aster service with meter box and curb stop required for each lot, FOR CONCRETE PIPE. B. Install storm drainage conveyance system: storm r BACKFiLL AROUND PIPE MUST BE COMPACTED TO A SPECIFIED AASHTO T•99 DENSITY OF 90X: USE REASONABLE M� Pipes, C13, H, etc. 8. The Contractor shall arrange for and make air tests of sanitary sewer and sewer connections CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION. U Q 9. Install other utilities: Sanitary sewer, water service, etc. under the supervision of -the City Engineer or his designated representative. Laterals to be 6" 1 ` Q 10. Final grade for pave. Consult with Geotech for final concrete pips, or P.V.C. conforming to SDR 3034 standards. ALL NON -PERFORATED METAL PIPE SHALL' HAVE NEOPRENE CASKETS Ai THE JOINTS. 0-RING GASKETS `MAY BE USED FOR TYPE F BANDS. recommendations, i 9. Existing underground facitities have been shown on this drawing for the purpose of assisting l Z -- N 11. Stabilize all exposed slopes with hydroseed and straw the contractor in locating said facilities in the field. The contractor shall be responsible GALVLINIZEb STEEL CMP' SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION M•36, TYPE 1 AND matting. '. for checking actual locations in the field and checking with e P TYPE 2: PIPE SMALL HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1 OR BETTER, 12. Clean up storm drainage system. g appropriate agencies that may have . underground facilities within the project limits. The contractor shall be solely responsible CORRUGATION - 2-2/3Xi/2 CORRUGATION • 3 X 1 13. Commence building construction. for any damage to underground facilities resulting from his operations. A.) G A E ft N Ar1a1J �� �� (+R� GAGF� BAND �IP� RC 0) INf;rrALL i=OUIL.IPA'TIOW WALLS A00 10. A copy of these approved plans must be on the job site whenever construction is in progress. 12"-36" 17X13 - 42X29 16 12" 421-•54" 16 24" 5411•1201, r l�IZAlI�IAG1�+' !. t1.. it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to clean, flush, disinfect where epplicable`end 60" 49X33 14 24" 126"•138" 4OX31 112X75 G.) ESrA0L.15H r-IWII;, l CIMA 199 • p° y 6611•901, 57X38 6403 12 24" 144" 117X79 = 137X87 - t7) CoMMENGE 'rW-AMIN61 AWES PrIN15N obtaln satisfactory approval from the City of Edmonds regarding the quality and integrity of 961, 71X47 10 24" 142X91 Vl// WO�K• existing water likes, sanitary sewer line, storm sewer line, retention system, etc. Written 77X52 - 83X57 8 20 ANNULAR RECORRUGATED ENDS OR ANNULAR CORRUGATED PiPE, 12"-84" ' acceptance by the City of these procedures must be transmitted to the design engineer DIAMETER, TYPES B,D $ F, TO HAVE 12" BAND; GAGE SAME AS PIPE. 12: Approved storm sewer materials areas follows: 1 A) concrete rubber gasketed joints. CORRUGATED ALUMI UM PIPE AND COUPLING BANDS s ' ! B) Galv. helical asph. coated treatment 1 steel 16 Be. or better gasketed. H196 AND M197. N HALL"MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTD C)Helical aluminum 16 ga. gasketed. I' CORRUGATION 2-2/3X1/2 CORRUGATION • 3 X 1 PIPE _ 1 ARCH GAGE BAND PIPE ARCH _ ' 12"-27" 17X13 - 42X29 16 12" 36 -6011 3011•36" 2BX20 35X24 14 21" 66"-72" y !EMP � 42"•54" 42X29 49X33 72 21" 78"-96" 60X46 • 95X67 i � ��(r Or//✓ �r '" �■='art" O.SON. CONTROL NOTES 60" 57X38 - 64X43 10 24" "• 106 144" 103X71 •112X75 SPIRAL RIB PIPE _ 18"-42a 16 12" 48-60" 14 21" 66"-84" 12 2111 C7$iE •y+ 1. APPROVAL OF THIS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF DESIGN, ANNULAR RECORRUGATED ENDS OR ANNULAR CORRUGATED PIPE, 12"-84" + 9�" SiZE, NOR LOCATION OF PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, OR RETENTION FACILITIES, BUT IS -AM APPROVAL OF--- - DIAMETER, TYPES BID $ F, TO HAVE 12" BAND, GAGE SAME AS PIPE. CONCRETE PIPE z1" OtA AND, LESS (ASTM C14 EXTRA STRENGTH) SHALL BE PLAIN AND CONFORM TO THE THIS DRAWING ARE SUCH AS TO MEET MINIMUM COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND L ESIGNATION M*86, EXPECTED (SEASONAL) CONDITIONS DICTATE, MORE SILTATION CONTROL FACILITIES MAY BE LEQUIREO TC INSURE JOINTS, UNLESS FSPECIFIEDSNTO DOTHERWISE. CONCR CLASS 2,2AN DIT AND DESIGNATION M-198 FOR RUBBER GASKET THE TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ONLY. THE SILTATION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON ION IT REINFORCED AND CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO DESIGNATION LARGER 1 SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER TO ADDRESS ANY NEW COND:TIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES OVER AND ABOVE MiNiMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 2. PROVIDE AiID MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER DOES NOT EHTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ANC' LANDSCAPiiIG ARE7A P t>D COMPLETED AND POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. lt * I y �. 3. TEMPORARY EROSION SEDIMENTATION COiITROL FACiLI %'I Lo A(CC�E.S�J rwvV.• �I RAD rJ r■ I, 78'LF •'•r� Co0" G1y/t P� p• 57: , DETENTION "SYSTEM PROFILE SORE: 1" : 20'(H)9 V = 4'(V) TiES SHALL CE CONSTRUCTED BY PLACING SILTATION CONTROL FILTERS AROUND SWALES (NATURAL OR MANMADE) AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL ,�; O SUCH TIME THAT LAND CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE CoMPLETED, 71 aY ",d i°r 41, M) `� ;! OPERATIONAL, AND THEN RETURNED TO ORIGINAL GROUND CONDITIONS. TEMPORARY SILTATIL>7 CONTROL FILTERS", " A Cj SHALL BE APPROVED FILTER FABRICS 2' TALL. w+ �ii,. (j 7S 4 4: BERMS AND SWALES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY TO DIRECT ALL SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO iIATURAL XG VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. DISCHARGE FROM CUTOFF SWALES SHALL BE DIRECTED TO DISPERSE INTO NATIVE A�1 r 'VEGETATION OH -SITE. ATE; ( Ci 0 3t 0 5: VEGETATION SHALL ,BE ESTABLISHED ON AREAS DISTURBED OR ON AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY To r7 00 MINIMIZE EROSION. AREAS TO BE ROUGH GRADED WITH FINISHED GRADING TO FOLLOW NEAR PROJECT COMPLETION �) ARE .TO BE ,SEEDED WITH ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYE GRASS. THiS ALSO INCLUDES PkdIMETER MIKES AND •.,-......,;,,.,�, a THE SEDIMENT BASIN EMBANKMENT. NYDROSEED PREFERRED. �.._""'.1..-, V' �' tr�,"j ,� }�_ ,F.. •» _ _ ., 1 - 1 v') 6. STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED. IN SAFE APEA:' AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND TY ENdINEE9 4 MULCHING. HYDROSEED PREFERRED. ------ co 7. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH GnADtNG, PERMANENT VEGETATION (CONSISTING OF RAPID, PERSISTENT AND I �� n ,� W LEGUME) WILL BE APPLIED (MIN. 80 LB/AC). THIS IS TO INCLUDE: II au 20% ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYD,RID RYE GRASS 40% CREEPING RED FESCUE - • 40Y WHITE CLOVER FILTER FABRIC _ 0 O i HYDROSEED PREFERRED. W/ WIRE MESH�• 2 X 4 DOUGLAS F IR 8. PREPARATION OF SURFACE; ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE 3/4' MIN DIA WASHED No I GRADE OR EQUAL ) x t9 ENGINEER. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED,BY DISCING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEANS. GRAVEL EA SIDE ALT-STL FENCE POST ►•a e FERTILIZER: SHALL BE APPLIED AT 4009 PER ACRE OF 10.20.20 (10 POUNDS PER 1100 SQUARE FEET) ORID EQUIVALENT. ,x i /� /air?err Ifojjjc � CEMENT GONG I CL 'B' WALK 51/2" /° ° CEMENT GONG CL'B' U \ _, Y A ° • /� - SECTION o / FILTER FABRIC-MIRAFI 140N' iz+ Y N Y OR EQUAL ATTACH W/ y d • d { tf} STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS 9 ' 2°X2°X14 GA WIRE'. ,. , ' 4 '. fc w MESH OR EQUAL II , • 24" II II Ij .VERTICAL CURB SEC_TIO. NO SCALE to 11 11 II - BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC 4' 0 C IN Sax 12a TRENCH TYP NOTE: 1 IJSTALLATI(';)LI OF eoGKETZy SFID�LL z., COMPL.Y W'11711 0ff0'-7 CH RF-Po --r 'yqk r3kTw 15f QJ�� FiLTER FENCE DETAIL 'II/9U• 1 s IMSPer-noto or PEt2•F, pipe pEq'b / �5� �� NO SCALE �aF PP- t0P_ -rO K-NAChr-ILL-. :M SC, I f V ILA`y1 '. S" M(N. THICKNEiSS OF i �.. 4 8" MIN u 4-"- Z" QUR ARY SPALISr--.' i Y DEPTH ? y vep 1 1 4°- 6° I" MINUS WASHED ROCK1 Q , SPACES I 2" ASPHALT CONC 4PEP-F. PIPt� '� ;d°�I /�/i 2% /� //Si/ PAVEMENT n, 1 5t_oa� o =---� 2.IT MAINTENANCE: The entrance shall n sine be mai t d' in . a I 12a/a .. `� r condition which will prevent tracking or flow of -.mud on`I:b ID �• • r,pffic---- public rights -of -way. This may require periodic top / ,� N' . '' " dressing with 2-inph stone, as conditions demand, and repa:ir • FILTER FABRIC •• •3' and/.dr, cl�anoLit of any structures used to 'Wrap sediment'.: All materials spilled, dropped, washed or' tracked froin p , I �,a °�'o °•O° .. o'° °,; o` • °' ° o 'o e o ° �e SIMILAr_ I'Al PPL.Ir vehicles - onto roadway or into storm drains must be removed immediately. ° PAY LIMITS i " i -1.0, EAS-r o 115N, 1S ; J I GXCA,VATION OWN e-OUP-'r, MAXIMUM W.64IrE�( i CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 'DETAI1 - ; _ THICKENED EDGE SECTION ROCKERY DVAIL ; . INo sc,_Atry _ NO .;SCALE - -- ApE rzoU E.15 J>A-r e C � ��,�,� Y 0 J Una p. i a•.,. W ,•. r , • LU • µ a JOB NO.- 90 - 4506 J L. ..� I '�n/ i 1 * . I rtU L. L. W. I I. 89228 r / u IOLACrz FIL'MIR FABRIC A5 SHOWN. 5elL OF -TAIL SHEET Z. CS 4 9 c-rrm7ir- Ord") . CS 4 to mm I) . CB# 11, Bran z ) VVInTAME Ir CqK M, Il l,`�Fr'AL,t.- W/FKAWIa ,rr 6RpcTE, W/Fl�by/IG �jG��AS�., d�I�R �x 12" PIFE TV - ► 0 1. bo' K_ASTAAA_ O1(I Z 1 X 8" P►t"� 17S 07.0a is% .9'7.90(12110UY) 1� IZ") i�'- 98.oD Cl2k I N� IE = 10G.23 (EX 91, I$ . • � PUG � Nt�Of� AI3Al ` \oz DAT CITY OF EDMONDS L. BENCHMARK.' TOP OF SSMH o r{t=-I,D�AT� GSIb�1,�1 hEW6R "• . ` � 15i" GU LV EtZT Q , qp A, , 44-10WM � 1 ° ,•� ham' 38 Lp r2"sn ^ 0 N:SOUTH OF SOUTH AT TOE OF 0(tAf •IKz_1 F1 M �" �,, �'` s = le. 4 t,Q HILL ON 76TH AVE. W. = 78.9 �,,�o pry• q\o °�� \o° \0 7Lf-- r 2" G I' \ooh°� VICINITY AP hb� - �F• t7 0 \n°� �l�ll%�igl�F3�`%�A d. ��GI3'*►2(TYPE r)` + ti o 1 ,v D 0\ NO SCALE '`°h° �\ �^ -- s v ss a re I = ��.3 r i 2") �/' a \DAn t, j Vti \,gyp Wr / �IZAME ¢ c�IZA7 - 9� : o n� �' °ry' �D E) \� TOP 115. 5 F a ^ �` \CPN `G /l/87°35''�3" o�� n LE. IIZ, p�Ii \N�, 1 20 x ! + K \ p ' i CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTS 62 AND 63 IN: THE n EA. 51 bE q� , p/,� / PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH. �o .�q eh Q Or t/ `�'�\�� G Q % / s 4 q 3 rk' ` 0 n" dkon �•tiQ� °b• L���`'nk 1• a'4 'N, ob / C38SP \° `� o^' F.h. . IS ACCESS EA9 EM � \Q ►1T \�'5 -obi � �� 0`�4 � �°\`� � �° j� ASCMEN•j' `�➢'�',L, `.ti 3 Q ,� � G o 3 r �oXA ./ ryti / 0 b � 3 y�,s tr��`� �� "` @ t9.4'�' (,N • ? t 11� ' 1 ,'/L/ / / � - ,/ -•_ _ � - q� A � .. , � .. ' e � .. . ©�y'.�G��' a�«ry �a„ct►„°' _U2EACE � � /L M - % ti �.�,•� • 'L�' --J � — --. _—,� — 2'/ — — — — — / �0� pw4 !F'"x i ✓ MT ,� DC QA a' , §-� ,.�' ,g ' "` ` t� ``' •`� /4 vc // 5TA L AIE I;DC3v Mgsr IyT. \ bb' . r x / / tN I2 \D Q^P 3 v .r° • i!! �'I�`bt of, ' }�� i GP Tp �, __` a 0 A� opff�•• A� et w i G f E f------- ---_ • p - , .. / / q�• - V + r c '� r Si '< c ,w.cw i�'d c `' ARGA p. AI N / I.%1. ® \(� �i/ , r,.. iPG�iED 1JITR '+Ff / \,/;,/ / c GGMt�GT�J SLd�'i Et�pE 4"GRUB-IIeD FZG-K , ti .r zz 2 GOMpACfEE'� a �, / w(I. TV ,�/ }\©A ,1t j ' � {$ +" y E = I o2, Z \� / i �\►oQ�� G3Ay% 19F-PTH CIZU51­1EI) \ t,IhPOt.IT y i5UPW TOpCO11Z5E 3; too►-I2 0ACCESS ROAD SECTION SAWGUT NrI SD6iell.. Z�C• Icx-n / NO SCALE 29.0 N NEW IWt`At WIDEt.Ipt�IG-� 3° j / l6.- 85.01 C-tYP� \\0' `\$s \�,� T -1t5.0 ± - �o o�---;/ D aat G� � � T1, 102. .ot r - TE — �Q Invert of interceptor drain given is approximate only and shall be subject to the exact y, f I E = 97. D I / \\l) '� �� y, / depth of the, Whidbey formation. A geotech shall be retained to observe conditions in, o t pA�0 f� ° i // the trench during construction. l / , u Q / CA1'ADETO MN To 5l1dER 00 FVMT. � GF too 8 t,F- 12"• GP I.ct:;ga � � •, 53 CL,EAI J0 u @ f�. `• ,:'. IS% CB �, \� @� q � I T + � � 1LL 1.06ATICIQ TO R r. : 7 CS #6 0I w �� ' FIELD VFW I FI C.D t iI-9 /U D I.d IN4 U D) (� T'Lz - 20.58 O •I- 21- . -} 1' LT (Ge) O/ t % 1 ----�/ ' FILL MP a D I a m 7&.75 CIZ" CZ707('RrPE 48" q ,� J�• an.a' II +-0sS - G-7.. 1`Sat ,1 I.Tkl/°DLD It+oZu CFlES i / / b� ,o »Izaul�l� ►'Ft ecH L° 0.50 /o a t} QO \ . tt 9 FERF WC FTc� Vj/ \°�' t ' � F a2 LF--12 S : I /� ca,za C-GRADE `Tb DI?1�1 D `'6 t / 'r' q " „ DI?A! ►.� 110 12M SD C,9 ; " \ : • \D I 4, Z h l ^ CO.�} L1' D ` 1 d ., p �tXEfZ�l�l3fLic IS L.F-12 SD tt ix, } / �• qo i o , �ot 2+ q" ti I 2 } 1. 8 ? s CT�F'i3 'Z-) . , Y .�d�l / g` / //FF—. S TED WG I „ �„ ..,.t,'� .. , .,., •- r PIPE. •Slnr•� Q...,,a, , .:. , .. ,,.., s„ ' +'"''' .,.`. ..., ..., '' , , a. '°" r,..::; r } „ , �>-:; : ti.,.'�,., •: �> , H I Z - 24• 1.0aft NJ.If1.... '�"� a 7�. v(J �?. .i;.,r ,,.5;: x s k: ,. t s81 .. •* , r,� ' lit / nI / vim, ` •.... , a.; .. n S .a., ,.. ,. ,. .,: ,, .,. 'Y.."'„ .`, X '1 ,... .., 'r,...,.i»,u. ,.1 ,x , .. ,,, t .r...swt ,.. r '. ,,,•.. .J.x *%S. Q%� . ,..yt;, i .,...t... ,.. r, »., ., #a, , .. r' ,:. ; .,..,,.p., -�" � , .. � , . , . i NOTE: METHOD OF D t.»,. .. ,p / RAIN INSTALLATION AND TRENCH SIDEWALL E PV G,Ew .,.�i �,•.: >,r,.><„5_i ` .; yw,.+, Gn2,o ., r, z,;;i „» ?. .-ti, .. .,.. �,k; ., }.,.. ,.c :•,•+•r,, Y i � t^5 sn Q _ . GRAN• .,, �'�•..�»..... 0 S C STABILITY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CON TRACTOR iq To U IQ _ _ ? SEE GEOTECH REPORT T-335 DATED AUGUST 19,1987 IZtI Sd �C `� ter. r r> t AgC7. x 'BY TERRA ASSOC:, INC, j ff 4, ti, l �P+' �, �� F ,� _o INTERCEPTOR TRENCH SECTION TYPICAL Mot��v wAT�R M�T� , x r <T°rME a GivL To I I7 0+3 MTAJL4SHEET 0+ 90-• 7.19 .2 xl `^ ` NO SCALE 91 iYF 2. .! !a.l�o 110 _T•C�r �(Dol' s' CB -3 LTYP>✓ L� , �q� gyp% 7 LF-- Coo" P .� O. e � / \` �� Q'��"' cot .011 � p. q6 D+(F-UP CUE 22 7.19 1''ZT h• / n - 'fl'I I�-LIED ,, � I �,' • �."1` , ' 20 A�-56 L) L I TY EA5eHF_U U r-r R I Barth , ; IS ti lA� M E C•ICE F_V 1✓S T. THI I ;i DEJS. Nbj; f_- } `31 DE • G �I� �RF3 AI.IP � I °� / O. X P,>• i 1�f 1-1 SI Di=c� / I h / \�h y"� fN ' _ _ — 2 0 18, _ _ ---- .rP1 No� \ '� j / / I I Tom► 0 1, I , 91 IE l' 2 -�2' - 9`'• ti \$ a rota h a q t oq. o (TYP) I 2°10 a le O ce 48' m �Fr�y,'V � `�h na j \\°"' I/ti ' 2 GJIT� CEM E>`1 T _ o, I I I -T _ Iz E.t� TO P- ----+ --� t y D T H Ll T6 8Z./o � I ! ,. V ..... •. .. •• Art`1 (�i Y 1.�E ^ , o o- ° I/1/ �� �Pg Veer � - - --ae.•.._.r,F--- W�4" PE: tZ p. PIP E Ai /6 74.3s /8 N Q" �.° r\ ! pV••C 'v — /4 r ¢, z /z . ¢ o�' d°' \�° 4 SEE f iAj L t ' i� i`Nl 20Ut (, I -I to tG NT Ah /t a.o4'i2 SG Z3 \ryr \ I �1t\f\� 3 �r,L�-1 F L O 2. A IqEN CQ FLA,t 4 Chi 9S \6 01 b a Gl.' ?� ' ,a,e_4: • l . GOt�-lG. a � at • e(\• Q---- — \d' \��r , 2p � -� Z" Gb1..1 Pr DEPTH ' ` � 20' 211 MIN COMPf DEt'M 61K 4,LAVKFACIU6. TbP \�� URAII\1 �rJI.L1�h>GI'S/8 M111US) Y o \°� ,� .oz.� o " ww ca m-r DEPnA GR tt,IRFAGt Eft: Molt. 3 0 — rtow 577rt/cTuRa "°t ' ,F ?* R. fc rS rj y Vth ST■ � .tZtomEG1-2'D / yiFZ�d L j / �,{-j�, 7 f - , K/r" ©l 1 I�� G! —•j:i ll •1/=�•-✓ t L.4.if1. C.:. , (NOT OPEN) ACCESS ROAD SECTION ct3�2 C�"r� aK s4"� W� � 4e-• • _ NO SCALE L117, Loc ICJ * 78 /oz. Zs UD /e 9�2a /5"our =,,.,�... .. F- r-1- -77 cos _"EH tin 110" PLACIL.TE12 I=AMMIGPIPROVED H�r-T2�. SEE. n�TaIL EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: �TAD e.a CUT = 2585 CYDS -�`a ��45,� .'�i� m �o.vls �nrE BY FILL = 250 CYDS 4v . ; '`�,': < t fi;12 G-rr GVMMEtJrS �� IBI�o � - " • 2 I9EVI5ED PEtZ CITY COMMeWT5 1013/90 LYL "OhARL PEARoqh^N' OWNER / DEVELOPER: CARL PEARSON Ana cr312 pIhE,At9p NOTES, sUf3MIT TO 5/2191 tZEM rso3o �uanr,-woo��n►•f»el way nre , P.O. BOX 70525 ea CITY or50MOMM Bothell, y. ^» kigton. 9a >i /STpR��.' GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN *ELEVATIONS PER CITY OF EDMONDS 164th ST. SW. AND "''�"�•''�`` = (2os)rrs-4581 2os}3,,2-424.- . 4X(296)362-3sy9 201 NW. 36TH ST. � c � I E�y� •S-fS-`lo SURv�r�,c ENct�ING >Pr�N MANAGEMENT SEATTLE, WA. 98107 ;75th PL. W. GROUNDWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM AS - BUILTS. ��e��,,�• _ DRAWN BY Wm R 5.1 l• 5 C"ec::Eo eYVe4l -s190 APPROVE() 9Y CITY OF EDMONDSW A S H I N G T O N -_ 1 OF 2 90 - 4506 r bl"x GENERAL NOTESbykonen 1. RESTORATION WILL BE GRASS SEEDING OR SALMONBERRY CUTTINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SECTION 8-0 1. OBTAIN APPROVAL FOR SEED 318 Terry Avenue North, Suite'A' MIXTURE FROM ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLANTING. Seattle, Washington 98109 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE MIXED, PROPORTIONED, CONVEYED AND PLACED IN ' voice: 206 264 7784 ACCORDANCE WITH UBC SECTION 1905 AND ACI 301. CONCRETE SHALL fax: 206 264 7769 ATTAIN A 28-DAY STRENGTH OF fc = 2,500 PSI AND MIX SHALL CONTAIN NOT LESS THAN 5-1/2 SACKS OF CEMENT PER CUBIC YARD AND SHALL BE PROPORTIONED TO PRODUCE A SLUMP OF 5" OR LESS. 3. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM ASTM A-185. 4. THE DESIGN SHOWN IS INTENDED TO COLLECT SURFACE RUNOFF. IT IS �t NOT INTENDED AS A MEASURE TO INCREASE HILLSLOPE STABILITY. THE o . tsar ENCLOSURE MAY COLLECT DEBRIS FROM SMALL SLOPE FAILURES, BUT ISSIONAL NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM EARTH MOVEMENT. THE ENCLOSURE LIES ON A MAPPED LANDSLIDE BLOCK WHICH MAY EXPIRES 8/21 " EXPERIENCE EMOVEMENT IN THE FUTURE. EMBANKMENT INTEGRITY AND PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE INTAKE AND PIPE SHOULD BE CHECKED AFTER ANY FLOOD OR MOVEMENT OF THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL. DRAWN: 5. SURVEYING AND MAPPING DONE BY CITY OF EDMONDS. COORDINATES DESIGN: BASED ON EXISTING CB a AND CB a 1. CONTOURS ARE APPROXIMATE. "rWY7 PROPERTY LINES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. CHECKED: 6. COMPACT FILL TO 90% MAXIMUM DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1577. A,P, Q -� 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING FLOWING WATER DURING _ CONSTRUCTION. 00PT9N�-PYL. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2000 _- - STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION (WSDOT) AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE METHOD AND MEANS PRWM TME- OF COP `:)-TRUCTION, INCLUDING SHORING AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR `, n TEMPO- ARY OR PERMANENT REDUCTIONS IN SLOPE STABILITY.00 _..._ .. . 10. NO DES ' EXCAVATIONS ARE PLANNED AS A PART OF THIS WORK. © 11. CONT \CTOR SHALL WORK WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. CON ` : `W77UN S060(,N(-15. �— ����j Ct-� a� SVU—sn� &.tgeq 4Zs�'—n v2� mt-G T6"y41f 0 ZA'i� �" JAI1t " )t � lid -C.rv, U7< T'► Z�_ L�1lNG�1'�.._fZUCI�. ��'�S'•—----._. _. ____---=-- I _ flu(; Nj �� r�r s 5 669(5 3 �f � Gii,f ' 5'7WvC REVISIONS: