The URL can be used to link to this page

16330 75TH PL W.PDF111111III lillIII III6076 16330 75TH PL W ADDRESS: / / O✓✓ l� / G� w `�` ! TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STR COVENANTS (RECORDED) FC CRITICAL AREAS:. o q— DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required Waiver DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATE] EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST D TED: Iv v v SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: /SLOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: GEOTECH REPORT DATED: v STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: .! 151- l� L:\TEMP\DST's\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc i PLANNING DATA STREET FILE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Name: UfA)rDate: I Site Address: l G 3 S`" /� - Plan Check 4G/0 2 p 1 Z t Project Description: AdCA T Reduced Site Plan Provided:'(YES)/ NO) Map Page: orner Lot: (YES / Critical Areas Determination 9: 4 tud Required quired er-o ❑ Waiver SEPA termination: Exempt ❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist Zoning:. 205 Z C� Flag Lot: (YES / GO `72— n9 S S P �22r�2d ice y('a r� �s r 5 F/Z G� ou�v�e1� ❑ APO List with notarized form I Setbacks Street: Side: Side: � Rear:6-:7_ S Actual Setbacks _ Street: Side. Side: Rear:, ❑ Detached Structures: ❑ Rockeries: ❑ Fences/Trellises: ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting M dulation: Stairs/ 0, v�S Datum Point: -s /✓, 60, iio �Q�Datum Elevation: Maximum Height Allowed: 2� 3 3 r"� Actual Height: Zy• Z w 3 3• j Other Parking Required: �� Parking Provided: 2 e4(,1J6 f_( Lot Area: 1 Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: !3 - Lot Coverage Calculations: Q DC hou Z. MS( r U dtd/— (z -11) 4-AAW AV" Se-, �y�j f ar*1 (90) + ADU Created: (YES J go Z Subdivision:. adow-JA& Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES /0 a i l o; G A t� �,. � c Comments � a � t 7 - 3r Plan Review By: / "(`r(09 s �Qj� Planning Data Fare 04-11-06.doc I City of Edmonds Critical Area Notice of Decision Applicant:bo� Property Owner: w (— Critical Area File #: UY� 2D04 O( ` Permit Number: �L /I Z 1 3 p2 Site Location: I 3.3 -7 S 1 �� Parcel Number: d p!/S 13 t o �0 oc) -?0 o Project Description: Add n � ^ �SL � w trap d^ 01 zCI-4 ❑ Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above. 1. There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. 2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. 3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. �w / o Sub N41e I-°lur of d r 3 AZ X 2--t- Critical Area Report Required'. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated 2II y /1 for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160: 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40:120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. r The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; 3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and 6. / The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.1.60 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of noncompliance. Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. . Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. ❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). A, "t ly't-- c (19f Reviewer -&ekp�- - Signature I /I LO Date Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. Revised 12/16/2010 I ,�_, i BUILDING DEPARTM!N, Applicant ma PERMIT APPLICAVON (Inside heavy Lines " IIE (OH NAME OF BUSlNE9tl) i (' I IMNA£S9 / + D �'I..6� 21110NO5 90 uT T PI1ONE NUMBNH M `,4111rf IAI fo#(Vscv` TNcJrNf rs_ ��cN/rBc%tdFiG �25i�NEl' 3.21/ I?4RlN, idnr '1TY 7 11'ELEPHUNE NL MBF.H NAME n 6 Y ADUHE'S O � F CITY I TEL}:Pf70rfE NV4Q] oT STATE LICENSE NUMBER I CITY LICENSE NUMBER 1,<gol ....r:ptlon of Property (t;how Below or Attach F'oor Coulee) 60 P14 of 111r: f� �y OF f A % nl?Ckz ; ,' lei Coh�i�' or �C� CDVN1V f ) ,,11!1 i Ac114� :, Arum USE /J �+ PERMIT PERMIT ZONE I,C` sPEC7�SPECTOR - J . ADDRESS I�? 7�1 ..� ^I S. IJ•"'T I.1/ PERMIY.SI.•lf:�jO AC1• AL LOTCOVERtCEro LOT COVEItACE PERMISSI LE 1E1GHT . - PROPOSED yFj1 T O �•jdCy/fie N//p�y�� r � TOTAL BLI 1WnA' It +t e:OUll:t:l YAI<I�—'�'pR 200 S1 F;D y.t kU9 I �571 .• FRONT VIDE REAR FRONT RIDE REAR_(' L•FJp'AL L01' IAHIANCL OR CONDITIQNAL USE - YE. [] NO PERMIT NUMBLI{ \NINE DE APYHO STREET R/t /� EXISTING B /� EET R/W �'."__FT DEFICIENCY THIS PROPEk� COMP. PLAN 8T. R/W WD_F-C. ..L�.C•C. EI REMARHB Driveway slopes not to exceed those p indicated on 3aridand Dwv- N 3 -1 - ..�It HF-CK BY METER 61LE tlEHY10E 8-`R I CIr:wRA NCF; —C CHEC BY C k is S ETt V I C>~ ` TYPE CONNFcrION JEH:F'lED SCPnC -I�uk F.xr7l �1 PEftC. TEST PERYTT E— p kFa{wkHs e TYPE OF co ' THUC1'1 N"THEI EC 1\t YllO t'EU RE•�UD OC UPAN I u YF� -NO NEW [Q L7Ne: YES 0 NO I CY GROUP -' - ❑ NON-RE97DENTIAL sIGN PLAN CRECHE BY . 1 THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL 'i, - `.'�� ' O Ann j RE'^A7N7Nc �(�• I] DEMOLISH WALL- SALES TAX nEMA7u:s H LD PE.CODE031.W, ! � I14{1{' ; ;'�• wLTER FENCE ' ORCF77-LE VI��VIv-1L U�(,�. I�1 ✓y J. �• I I REPAIR ❑ PRE•-SIOt?I ❑ PRTM INS:. POOL -.„�_ N UMaEIt OF bTORIES NUM➢ER OF I DWELLING I UNITS NATUN':; Ol, WORK TO n}; DONE I�{� U41OA � 10!�)� S N( Ynluntlon PerI ReeelPt \o. •''&I T ' 1 , )Da (y/7 V� U NDI..{.-- �� r �C! II�JCf'� -- Plan Che k No.. I PIIGPOSE�— D USE — n'IILDING r v� — ,/ (�• =-- -- 1 1111111 ••; ;1 �5b•. V l VIA-E��/LVt"l7 PLOT P:..\IP (Indlcn;c HUIICI P...t [ueka, nbuttlnR VIA{=3 .[reeUl- PLU.HB:NC �•� I HE�`•' —� A2 I I i I• .,.!M �' �' •t• . h GAS LINE !�—) � e 0 /t J e ✓t�//tee V FENCE SIG. T= T.7'Tn::{INJ HALL N -- 9NIMMING POOL j DENOLITIOY i i •',-'. �{ PRE -MOVE INSPECTION a I I EXCAVATION OR FILL --- I 4! n-rear neknowl<(ge that I nave rem thin epvb:auon: that the tn- [otmatlon glvb en TOTAL AMOUNT ncE a• correct: .: that I a h the omeq or the duly author- Iced agert•of the owner. I agree to cemplY with city and ,tall Iawe a:.vnKu- latlr.R tru,tloo: end In doing tho w-ork ..thortaed A':TEN'T'IOJ1 i l ,� thereby, no penon will La emp:)yed In vlolatbn e: the Labor Codo of the State APPLICATIO !APPROVAL ;:. <t ' • of Woahington relatlog to Workeow. Compenaetion ?WUMLe, . T1nR :dR.H7T AUT:,neuzeo - This application is not a -�� - NOTE: P_-mil Limit One Yeai (E,cept DEMOIITION9 which In ntte{y day.: .hall be c,. permit until ONLY TI{E signed by the Building Offlcisl or his Dep- WORT{ •.--;tf: L:UVF.0.IN BOILDINGI ,lull be win. weted In .I.. {nontha.) ..d NOTED uty; and tees are paid, and receipt is ae. :IGN ::ll Olt AGENT) kno;vledged in space provided. �• DATE a1GNE--Ij - INS PECTION 'tl I ;•`'" �,• ] r�l I--/3 �� DEPARTMENT t'CT tlIONAT'�'{�,E, /� :+t t CITY Or • NOTE: ,1 pp rca:lr Sr:Gjrrr to Plan Cbrrk Fee EDMONDS Gal a ;.'—Itr o.k W be man n prle't< pen y A pert ONLY. 775-2525 I' -- •I r ona^'ucOo �, on' he peblle do aln teurbe, Idewnike, drlvoware. area«., le. l.-Ii1'.yule, "Parete—.11.10n. `{ �� •''� `hj ,,� 9', CITY of EDMIIDS Awn E SEWER PERMIT For Inspection Call 771-3202 STREET F1L9W PERMIT NO. 07525 _ LY_NNW00D LINE F Address of Construction: /l0 3 30 %6 � /j 60, Property Legal Description (Include all easements): 04 �e Owner and/or Builder: Contractor & License No: Singl:e Family Residence k-,-- i1 Multi -Family (No. of Units ) Commercial. (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No �� Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way. Construction Permit required. Call One-Call-Center.(1-800-424-5555) before any' excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No f10 Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legaldescription and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify &h,dt I have read an all comply Date with the items listed on the bick. Permit Fee: �' �: Issued By:\\J bT_-, Trunk Charge: Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: •�C Partial Inspection: Comments. Date Initia-1 Final Inspection Approved: �j7 8b Date Initial 00 o Rejected: Reason Date . Initial ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB `SITE > ** cl� Wh-ite Copy - File Green Copy'- Inspector Buff Copy - Applicant / �V� Q�Nnt A4 I a A. goVA �-� Olt i U) Qv � I o A LO O 1 z cn co- W � a? W� o� �a u ^'� �i �i� : Gvi �-oiE,1a fms USC. by the Ci4° of `,�. Thn City of Edrnor,ds dm:� ncs Any or vitty rep frrfl+ o�. lfl Map pal,C� o�a�.,_ �. ej, Ina' ! ' ic n w bt' rt , : W;: t�. fhu c�.;-^.. a of a- C rrs) or I": may and wI ncri:. _ : at' Hy -3G PLANNING DATA NAME: DATE: SITE ADDRESS: 19370 7 ac4c L Vtr- PLAN CHK#: ^)-0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: i I `n I REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: es / No MAP PAGE: q56 CORNER LOT: es / No FLAG LOT: es / No ZONING: RS-Xo CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: oq-69 ❑ Study Required: Waiver 1 � / xf 1 /� t i'0�$l,j� a/Yq CWIj d40 �) t V t_ I f ❑ Conditional Waiver �' SSOP Per w,4G 17�- ?-y0 Cr SEPA DETERMINATION: ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO list w/ notarized form ❑ (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) 14 Exempt SETBACKS: Re uired Setbacks:. i . / Street: d Left Side: 10 3$ Light Side: Iv ! 3S Rear: aS Actual Setbacks: / i re v11 / 3 i Street: 130 Left Side y " Right Side: g Rear. Y Street map checked fo dd' nal setback required? Yes / No rDN lXe.�,pi ❑, DETACHED STRUCTURES. 14h-r( Sked 4K� �rA prfl I:n( - 71 over _ Prgr ❑ ROCKERIES: - Stvlr4i 0^ eroQ� SO' ^0 ntw, e^e) pfr/jj ® NVA -Cd /�OV^tii► ❑ FENCES/TRELLISES: - it0/`f /Jr0d 1 �{ I� I To ❑ BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION: - "it pnywRd deck / o ` — K" ❑ STAIRS / DECKS: - p4 :. 7'�7S q! P �oTry.� _ fL�Ci� ► n 01.4ir PARKING: Reequuired:�Acturlal:� -!—Per'. �tMPnft0�1 �f .Orl�� LOT AREA:J g)2- �l �1"f wvr fecarj f decK. LOT.COVE COVE Pf 3 s rnid-an- BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point:A i % d Datum Elevation: Maximum n(No d: Actual Height: A.D.U. CREATED? -Yes) SUBDIVISION: LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: Ores No OTHER: /r Yo (,eNrovP_Plotic- SW jIV,7- ellcroesch Ov-e/ i0). 11' 171Y� l�v�,�- Plan Review NewBPPIanningDataForm.D0C °' City REdmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 4C g90 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, Cr. may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: ! City Receipt#:�f/C�� Critical Areas File #: Z004 — 00(69 Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: 15 --ZS -Q�- A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the. signed copy of this form. to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, i� ideration cn the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds ha ess from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infractio /base n whole or part upon false, .misleading, inaccurate or incomplete infortr: ±ion furnished by the applicant, his7}ter/' agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information nd hibits erewit submitted are true and correct to the best of my. knowledge and that I am authorized to file this rcation the be if of the owner as listed be w. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT `� DATE / Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and po Ig attendant to thisapplic ion. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE ✓ _ Oer/Applica1 Applicant Repres tative: 2 Z�� _ t_ � Name T St eet Address Street Address V-4.Aj, City State _Zip . City ``_ State r Zip Telephone S Telephone:�_� Email address (optional)- V,-) �0 Email Address (optional): PE (« Critical Areas Checkiist.doc/4.22.20, �w/'� *Critical Areas Checklist*CA File No: Site Information (soils/topography/ �7hydrology/ vegetation) /� 1. Site Address/Location: / V 3 3 0 / s P1 5 W C— J,,-J5 ( I 2. Property Tax Account Number: 6'0 3 ti(e D Ob COO 0 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): —la0010 4. Is this site currently developed? */\ es; no. If yes; how is site developed? CAS j d'eIt-'u 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: i] Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: D ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? _ 8. Site is in the�flloodway _ floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contain �i reek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? t o Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. S' 's primarily: forested ;meadow ;shrubs ;mixed ban landscaped (lawn, sFiru -et . 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: /0 1. 2. 3. 4 5. -- For City Staff Use Only Plan Check Number, if applicable? Site is Zoned? O DETERMINATION STUDY REQUIRED Reviewed by: >' WAIVER ate: S - :2-LI 4 . 15A Critical Areas Checklist.doc/4.22.2003 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION Project Location: 16330 75`h Place West KR: ET FILE Applicants: Paul Dent Project Description: Replacement of a 224 square foot second -story deck on the west side of the existing single-family residence on the proposal site. See Attached: R1 Site Plan ❑ Elevation Plan Check Number: PC-04-0201 Date Issued: September 2, 2004 SEPA Determination: Exempt Issued byY: Ross Beckley , Planner/the The above project has been determined to be exempt froquirement to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under WAC 173-27-040(2)(g), which states: Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof. "Single-family residence" means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance. An "appurtenance" is necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of a single-family residence and is located landward of the ordinary high water mark and the perimeter of a wetland. On a state-wide basis, normal appurtenances include a garage; deck; driveway; utilities; fences; installation of a septic tank and drainfield and grading which does not exceed two hundred fifty cubic yards and which does not involve placement of fill in any wetland or waterward of the ordinary high water mark. Local circumstances may dictate additional interpretations of normal appurtenances which shall be set forth and regulated within the applicable master program. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark; Robert Fritzen, Shoreline Planner with the Department of Ecology, has stated that this has been interpreted to include additions and remodels to existing single-family houses, provided that they are normal appurtenances to single-family dwellings. This exemption is not being sent to the Department of Ecology because it appears to City staff that it is not subject to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers section 10 permit under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (the provisions of section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act generally apply to any project occurring on or over navigable waters. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.) Nor does the project appear to City staff to require a section 404 permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. (The provisions of section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally apply to any project which may involve discharge of dredge or fill material to any water or wetland area. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.) Robert Fritzen has advised us that per WAC 173-27-050, no letter is required to be sent to Department of Ecology. While this letter provides an exemption from the need to obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit from the City of Edmonds, it does not evaluate whether other State and Federal approvals are required and leaves that responsibility to the applicants. cc: Street file for 16330 75`h Place West Shoreline Permit Exemption File Page 2 of 2 0 V 0 z ai 3 ^As V - — s �- a, ri � M r o o � rs Lx) ri• a as -I- I A� te 3 I , I ' O U\ I • �g 17��. - ` r��ex �. �i Q 4` V G n 3 �!'sS91N z�l �I ss9lN' 0 N N R W pO •�1 r, n dW ih U ce U "�'•wC � " C! � V1 2.� � �p W ` Wag'- W�ti cZ a $ Z W Wil VI w�0� W !I m6 uR m �}z ao�v Fa Z�OR Owo� OT aZ� 83<i Um a 8 101.!0{� WWg(/ rUL NZj OVIar �', z; �O< N FNW Noz>t wx � WCLOO a z (S<< rj U U �Om o_ vWiWW� W] WU�00 ZO ONF 1W�o N H Vl aH zZO 4t w0MW 10i-W0 32U 2. . p tV ZZ lam CZ W=Z0 C < xayy a> 1WWu� Z�Za�Ox, mopw, g <�w WZ�am OUWZO __� z zos z Zmmh Qa Wp �ia3 cr;0Q Z S �"Zog W K W� F N W 4WF N tt mm V) CR W W Ewa o 2 Za NJ00- ri �U(xtt s::;� � '� ...7n___•-j' �C. LEI_•,; �� - I I I gh co `I I .... N as' NI7,4 r .»:a c 1 ,.•;:::_ :? I ... ,yam.„....,;.�.: •• � � � z l , 4 ` SS �- ss -__ 'i--- ss I — �l .0 V - bb_-- -Lse Sk 4� ` i .-• -.. __: '—moo... ,I -�,,�`Dl/ i z 0 ' U ti vl ( vJ 0 O I i z o O h ^ O W g N 3 rQ � 2 k O � � ddCl W a Fill J ' w U ti✓'� S � P �S6e�el;,� SDP � e,�,r,� f 6� y notice by mail; (13) "Permit" means any substantial development, variance, conditional use permit, or revision authorized under chapter 90.58 RCW; (14) "Public interest" means the interest shared by the citizens of the state or community at large in the affairs of government, or some interest by which their rights or liabilities are affected including, but not limited to, an effect on public property or on health, safety, or general welfare resulting from a use or development; (15) "Structure" means a permanent or temporary edifice or building, or any piece of work artificially built or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner, whether installed on, above, or below the surface of the ground or water, except for vessels; (16) "Transmit" means to send from one person or place to another by mail or hand delivery. The date of transmittal for mailed items is the date that the document is certified for mailing or, for hand -delivered items, is the date of receipt at the destination; (17) "Variance" is a means to grant relief from the specific bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program and not a means to vary a use of a shoreline; (18) "Vessel" includes ships, boats, barges, or any other floating craft which are designed and used for navigation and do not interfere with the normal public use of the water; (19) The definitions and concepts set forth in RCW 90.58.030, and chapters 173-25 and 173-26 WAC also apply as used in this chapter. [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3) and [90.58].200. 96-20-075 (Order 95-17), § 173-27-030, filed 9/30/96, effective 10/31/96.] WAC 173-27-040 Developments exempt from substantial development permit requirement. (1) Application and interpretation of exemptions. (a) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the substantial development permit process. (b) An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption from compliance with the act or the local master program, nor from any other regulatory requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the policies and provisions of the applicable master program and the Shoreline Management Act. A development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to the local master program or is an unlisted use, must obtain a conditional use permit even though the development or use does not require a substantial development permit. When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional and performance standards of the master program, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a variance. (c) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process is on the applicant. (d) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a substantial CHAPTER 173-27 WAC [41 Ecology Edition • • development permit is required for the entire proposed development project. (e) Local government may attach conditions to the approval of exempted developments and/or uses as necessary to assure consistency of the project with the act and the local master program. (2) The following developments shall not require substantial development permits: (a) Any development of which the total cost or fair market value, whichever is higher, does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For purposes of determining whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030 (2)(c). The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed or found labor, equipment or materials; (b) Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to shoreline resource or environment. Ae-viacement+o a s , c i �eior de�elspment may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method o repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the _ (c) Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A "normal protective" bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being constructed or reconstructed, not more than one cubic yard of fill per one foot of wall may be used as backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no further waterward of the existing bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has , deteriorated such that an ordinary high water mark has been established by the presence and action of water landward of the bulkhead then the replacement bulkhead must be located at or near the actual ordinary high water mark. Beach nourishment and bioengineered erosion control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements and when the project has been approved by the department of fish and wildlife. (d) Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. An "emergency" is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety, or the CHAPTER 173-27 WAC 151 Ecology Edition • • environment which requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this chapter. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed by the administrator to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation the new structure shall be removed or any permit which would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, these regulations, or the local master program, obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of chapter 90.58 RCW and the local master program. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an emergency; (e) Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities on shorelands, construction of a barn or similar agricultural structure, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including but not limited to head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels: Provided, That a feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, alteration of the contour of the shorelands by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations; (fl Construction or modification, by or under the authority of the Coast Guard or a designated port management authority, of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor 4'bu oys;onstruction on shorelands by an owner, lessee or contract purchaser of a single-family sidence for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does not exceed a height of thirty-five feet above average grade level and which meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof. "Single-family residence" means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance. An "appurtenance" is necessarily connected to the use and enjoyment of a single-family residence and is located landward of the ordinary high water mark and the perimeter of a wetland. Onsa-,state=wid'eybasis normal appurtenances,includesa garage; deck; ° riveway; utilities; fences; installation of a septic tank and drainfield and grading Which does not exceed two hundred fifty cubic yards and which does not involve placement of fill in any wetland or waterward of the ordinary high water mark. Local circumstances may dictate additional interpretations of normal appurtenances which shall be set forth and regulated within the applicable master program. Construction authorized under this exemption shall be located landward of the ordinary high water mark; (h) Construction of a dock, including a community dock, designed for pleasure craft only, for the private noncommercial use of the owners, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single- family and multiple -family residences. A dock is a landing and moorage facility for watercraft and does not include recreational decks, storage facilities or other CHAPTER 173-27 WAC [61 Ecology Edition appurtenances. This exception applies if either: (i) In salt waters, the fair market value of the dock does not exceed two thousand five hundred dollars; or (ii) In fresh waters the fair market value of the dock does not exceed ten thousand dollars, but if subsequent construction having a fair market value exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars occurs within five years of completion of the prior construction, the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development for the purpose of this chapter. For purposes of this section salt water shall include the tidally influenced marine and estuarine water areas of the state including the Pacific Ocean, Strait of Juan de Fuca, Strait of Georgia and Puget Sound and all bays and inlets associated with any of the above; (i) Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters, including return flow and artificially stored ground water from the irrigation of lands; 0) The marking of property lines or corners on state-owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water; (k) Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on June 4, 1975, which were created, developed or utilized primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system; (1) Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW; (m) Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of an application for development authorization under this chapter, if (i) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of the surface waters; (ii) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality, and aesthetic values; (iii) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure, and upon completion of the activity the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; (iv) A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the local jurisdiction to ensure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions; and (v) The activity is not subject to the permit requirements of RCW 90.58.550; (n) The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW 17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed control that are recommended by a final environmental impact statement published by the department of agriculture or the department of ecology jointly with other state agencies under chapter 43.21C RCW; (o) Watershed restoration projects as defined herein. Local government shall review the projects for consistency with the shoreline master program in an expeditious manner and shall issue its decision along with any conditions within forty-five days of receiving all CHAPTER 173-27 WAC [71 Ecology Edition materials necessary to review the request for exemption from the applicant. No fee may be charged for accepting and processing requests for exemption for watershed restoration projects as used in this section. (1) "Watershed restoration project" means a public or private project authorized by the sponsor of a watershed restoration plan that implements the plan or a part of the plan and consists of one or more of the following activities: (A)'A project that involves less than ten miles of streamreach, in which less than twenty-five cubic yards of sand, gravel, or soil is removed, imported, disturbed or discharged, and in which no existing vegetation is removed except as minimally necessary to facilitate additional plantings; (B) A project for the restoration of an eroded or unstable stream bank that employs the principles of bioengineering, including limited use of rock as a stabilization only at the toe of the bank, and with primary emphasis on using native vegetation to control the erosive forces of flowing water; or (C) A project primarily designed to improve fish and wildlife habitat, remove or reduce impediments to migration of fish, or enhance the fishery resource available for use by all of the citizens of the state, provided that any structure, other than a bridge or culvert or instream habitat enhancement structure associated with the project, is less than two hundred square feet in floor area and is located above the ordinary high water mark of the stream. (ii) "Watershed restoration plan" means a plan, developed or sponsored by the department of fish and wildlife, the department of ecology, the department of natural resources, the department of transportation, a federally recognized Indian tribe acting within and pursuant to its authority, a city, a county, or a conservation district that provides a general program and implementation measures or actions for the preservation, restoration, re—creation, or enhancement of the natural resources, character, and ecology of a stream, stream segment, drainage area, or watershed for which agency and public review has been conducted pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW, the State Environmental Policy Act; (p) A public or private project, the primary purpose of which is to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage, when all of the following apply: (i) The project has been approved in writing by the department of fish and wildlife as necessary for the improvement of the habitat or passage and appropriately designed and sited to accomplish the intended purpose; (ii) The project has received hydraulic project approval by the department of fish and wildlife pursuant to chapter 75.20 RCW; and (iii) The local government has.determined that the project is consistent with the local shoreline master program. The local government shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide it by letter to the project proponent. (3) Hazardous substance remedial actions. The procedural requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW shall not apply to a project for which a consent decree, order or agreed order has been issued pursuant to chapter 70.105D RCW or to the department of ecology when it conducts a remedial action under chapter 70.105D RCW. The department shall, in consultation with the CHAPTER 173-27 WAC [81 Ecology Edition 0 appropriate local government, assure that such projects comply with the substantive requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW, chapter 173-26 VAC and the local master program. [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3) and [90.58].200. 96-20-075 (Order 95-17), § 173-27-040, filed 9/30/96, effective 10/31/96.] WAC 173-27-050 Letter of exemption. Some projects conducted on shorelines of the state also require review and approval by federal agencies. Ecology is designated as the coordinating agency for the state with regard to permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The following is intended to facilitate ecology's coordination of local actions, with regard to exempt development, with federal permit review. (1) The local government shall prepare a letter of exemption, addressed to the applicant and the department, whenever a development is determined by a local government to be exempt from the substantial development permit requirements and the development is subject to one or more of the following federal permit requirements: (a) A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers section 10 permit under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899; (The provisions of section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act generally apply to any project occurring on or over navigable waters. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.) or (b) A section 404 permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. (The provisions of section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally apply to any project which may involve discharge of dredge or fill material to any water or wetland area. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.) (2) The letter shall indicate the specific exemption provision from WAC 173-27-040 that is being applied to the development and provide a summary of the local government's analysis of the consistency of the project with the master program and the act. (3) Local government may specify other developments not described within subsection (1) of this section as requiring a letter of exemption prior to commencement of the development. [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3) and [90.581.200. 96-20-075 (Order 95-17), § 173-27-050, filed 9/30/96, effective 10/31/96.] WAC 173-27-060 Applicability of chapter 90.58 RCW to federal lands and agencies. The policies and provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW including the permit system shall be applied in the following manner to federal agencies on lands meeting the criteria of the Shoreline Management Act for shorelines of the state. (1) Within the coastal counties. Direct federal agency actions and projects shall be consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the approved Washington state coastal zone management program subject to certain limitations set forth in the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. (CZMA) and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. Other applicable federal law governing the federal agency actions may determine whether the permit system of chapter 90.58 RCW is applicable. CHAPTER 173-27 WAC [91 Ecology Edition - s ;5 A • • TRA HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. Geoteehnical Engineering • Hydrogeology • Geoenvironmental Services • Inspection & Testing RECEIVEE) May 19, 2004 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 ITY Mr. Paul Dent CC _x 16330 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL RECONNAISSANCE REPORT A01, �� Dent Property Deck Replacement 16330 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Paul; MAY 2 7 2004 PERMIT COUNTER FILE! As requested, HWA GeoSciences Inc. (HWA) completed a site reconnaissance and cursory geotechnical evaluation of the rear (west) patio area of your (above -referenced) property in Meadowdale. The property is situated within the Meadowdale Landslide Complex (MLC), a known landslide hazard area. We understand that you are proposing to replace an existing, 40-year old, wooden deck on the west side of your house. The new deck will have the same dimensions and configuration as the old deck. The City of Edmonds requires that any new development in the MLC be completed in accordance with the permitting requirements of Chapter 19.05 of Edmonds Development Code (EDC), Building Requirements — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. OBSERVATIONS The following observations were made by Erik O. Andersen, P.E., during a site reconnaissance on May 14, 2004. At the time of the inspection, the old deck -had already been removed. The existing house is a 2-story, wood -frame construction, with stained cedar siding, and cast -in -place concrete spread footings. You indicated that the house was constructed in the early 1960's. There were no cracks noted in the exposed concrete stem walls along the north and south sides of the house. The ground surface adjacent to the house gently slopes down to the west at approximately 8H:1V (hon'zontal:vertical). Approximately-20 feet west of the house, the ground slope increases to about 2.5H:1V for approximately feet vertically, and then returns to the gentle approximate 8H:1 V inclination. 19730 ;.:64th Avenue w jl ' By inspection of the geomorphology of the area, the more steeply -sloping h 8u e 200 _ k L'ynnwaQd WA=98036c5.957 � TeIi 425b774.0 06 a,F 425.774.2�714 �t `www:hwageosciences.com 1 � May 19, 2004 • • HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 ground to the west of the house might be a fill. An approximately 16 ft (north/south) by 14 ft (cast/west) concrete patio slab is situated on the west side of the house. There were no significant cracks, nor evidence of settlement, in the concrete slab. Near the northwest and southwest comers of the slab, there were 2 holes in the slab, where posts for the old deck were supported. The actual sizes and depths of the 2 post footings were unknown at the time of our site reconnaissance. You indicated that the proposed new deck will be the same size as the old deck, approximately 16 ft (north/south) by 14 ft (east/west). The new deck will be at the 2nd floor level, directly above the concrete patio slab. The deck will be constructed with pressure -treated lumber and composite wood/plastic decking. The deck joists will be hung from the house on the east side, and they will be supported with a beam and two posts on the west side. You indicated that you propose to place the posts at the same location as the posts for the old deck were located. I probed the soil around the concrete slab using a '/2-inch diameter, pointed steel rod. The soil probe would typically penetrate the soil an average of 6 inches under body weight, with a maximum probe depth of 12 inches. I concluded from this probing that the soil around the patio was medium dense to dense, and capable of supporting the post footings. EXISTING SUBSURFACE INFORMATION We reviewed our files and our library of available consultant reports for existing subsurface information in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The following reports were reviewed: 1) Gogert Meadowdale Lot, 16300 Block 751h Place West, Edmonds, Washington, consultant report by Cascade Geotechnical, dated January S, 1990. The Cascade Geotechnical study was performed in support of development of the residence immediately to the south, at 16340 75`h Place West. Two borings were drilled on the property, which revealed about 11 feet of colluvium (existing landslide debris), underlain by medium dense to very dense/hard native sand and silt. A site plan and boring logs from this report are attached. 2) Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc., dated October 16, 1979. The Roger Lowe Associated study included a boring drilled along the west shoulder of 75`h Place West, near the 16400 block of 75`h Place West. The boring, (designated Boring 7 in the report), encountered about 24 feet of existing landslide debris over native hard clay. Roger Lowe concluded that the area the subject property lies within had a landslide hazard of ground failure of previously failed materials (i.e., 2004-067-21 Ir 2 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. May 19, 2004 • • HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 remobilization of existing landslide materials), with a probability of failure of 90 percent in 25 years. A log of Boring 7 is attached to this report. 3) Report of Geotechnical Consultation, Property Value Appraisals and Assessments, Meadowdale Landslide Area, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by GeoEngineers Incorporated, dated February 28, 1985. The GeoEngineers study concluded that the installation of subsurface drainage improvements and sanitary sewers in the early 1980's (known as LID 210 Improvements) had resulted in a substantial decrease in the risk of landsliding in the MLC. GeoEngineers concluded that the area the subject property lies within had a probability of failure of 30 percent in a 25 year period. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We observed no surficial evidence of soil settlement or slope instability around the subject property or approximately 40-year old house. The proposed deck is the same size and configuration the old deck. It is our opinion that the new deck will not reduce the stability of the site or adjacent sites. We recommend the deck posts be supported on new, 12-inch (minimum) diameter cast - in -place footings. Sonotubes may be used to form the footings, however, the annular space between the excavation and the outside of the sonotube should also be filled with concrete. The footings should extend at least 18 inches below the top of the slab, for frost protection. The foundation soil (i.e., the bearing soil that is exposed at the base of the temporary excavation) should be compacted to a dense/hard condition prior to concrete placement. Provided that these recommendations are implemented in the deck replacement construction, there will be no increase in the potential for soil movement on the subject property or on adjacent properties. LIMITATIONS Our scope of work included a visual assessment and review of existing geotechnical information. Deep borings or other intrusive testing on the subject property may have indicated other conditions that are not apparent in a visual inspection. The interpretations in this report should not be construed as our warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and ground water conditions can vary significantly over small distances. If,during future site operations, subsurface conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein, HWA should be notified for review of the recommendations of this letter report, and revision of such if necessary. 2004-067-21 Ir 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. May 19, 2004 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 The scope of work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services on this project. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please contact the undersigned at (425) 774-0106. Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. Erik O. Andersen, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer EOA:BEH:eoa ATTACHMENTS: Site Plan and Boring Logs from Gogert Meadowdale Lot, 16300 Block 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington, consultant report by Cascade Geotechnical, dated January 8, 1990, for the property at 16340 751h Place West, 3 sheets. 2. Log of Boring 7 from Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc., dated October 16, 1979, 2 sheets. 2004-067-21 Indoc 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. W �- Ja Q Z 0 Q O0 Q.0 WCD Z 0 co in `o V lS3 CV co O /J 00 '6 1 N N \ n w o L 0 Qw co w ,I ---.9'99'A3T3 bOOO tO 30N3GiS38 0 co J LO t.f) LO a •&y ,V g N N O N co 1-4' Q' Z z a J CL w 0 w LL. H z w 0 z O cc LL rn co rn N_ CD z a cc w cn w w Q ° o M � x A OW CL CL W Q UJ » Q m m= V Q c v+ ; � O Z a3 O M ~Q 00 C) o O � Zcn•o �� or, N O O S w co� ::> °, V O '^ fN Z -, is z } is w Q En 3 Q m Z vWi V g m T ZtDg 2 y H Y >- U v, w W o >. F-. W cc LU 0 v W N w U HH Q O r IV N W () O U 2 Z Z N U- QoQ+� U djec Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Tyve SKID MOUNTED a Soil Description & Classification Notes z COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH MINOR GRAVEL, MOTTLED 2 3 7 10 FRACTURED SILTS WITH SANDY MATRIX, LOOSE, DAMP TO'- 5 WET. 10/04/89 2 4 4 8 COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH ORGANIC DEBRIS, LOGS, — GRAY, SATURATED, LOOSE. 10 SAND; GRAY, SATURATED, MEDIUM DENSE, VERY'Fl-NE-- 2 5 10 15 GRAINED, GRADES TO SILT WITH LAMINATES OF SAND, SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, DENSE, 8 12 18 30 GLACIAL TILL. (SM) 20 SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, 10 30 40 VERY HARD, DAMP. (ML) ; r CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORING LOG A DIVISION OF Im CASCADE TESTING LA80RATORY. INC. Page __L_ Of zProiect GOGERT MEADOWDOE e Job No. 32G Date 10/04/89 Boring No. 2 Dwn. By HLA V Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Goo/Eng. P. JEWETT Hole 0 4" 0. D. Fluid > a Q. E 0 Penetration Soil Description & Classification Notes 0 cc 5 WOOD; *HIGH BLOW COUNTS IN LOG. COLLUVIUM; FRACTURED SILT IN MATRIX OF VERY FINE SAND & SILT, MINOR TRACE ORGANICS, GRAY, DAMP. GRADATIONAL CONTACT SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, ASH LAYER, STIFF, DAMP. (ML) SILT; GRAY, VERY HARD, DAMP, MASSIVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) 3 12 5* 17* 10 2 2 2 4 — 15 2 4 6 110 20 13 17 21.38 25 12 15 18 33 12 18 29 47 T. D. = 29.0' Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. TEST BORING LOG Page 1 Of City of Edmonds . i t DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT 0 1 1 2( 3c z� 4C October 16"i9 Plate A - WEST SIDE OF 75TH PLACE W. BORING SEVEN APPROXIMATELY. 1640o BLOCK SURFACE ELEVATION 83 FEET (OATUM PA --LW) GRAPHIC LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION IST Y T( ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. I LOG OF EXRLORATION ' Ci cy of _drnonds i Octc�er lb, 1 BORING SEVEN CONTINUED DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG 4 59 11111 CL 45 Plate 141� SOIL DESCRIPTION DARK GRAY CLAY (HARD TO VERY HARD, DRY TO DAI F ) WHIDBEY FORMATION I 60RING TERMINATED AT 41.5 FEET ON 8/28/79 ROGER LOWE RSSOCIRTES INC. LOG OF EXPLORE-IO'q " I Iillll IIIII IIII! IIIII Ilill IIIII !III! Illil IIIiI li!LI II►11 IIIII IIII Ilil V/ 200411030052 6 PGS 11-03-2004 09:20am $43.00 RETURN ADDRESS: SNOHOMISH COUNTY. -WASHINGTON City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 pk' COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #• SS ry Grantor(s): (1) Pd4 V G 615N! (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds ' I Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec J Twn��Rn� D y QtrW OR Lot / Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) ��ds� 3 fo v0 �� (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel.ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RE W fDING DATE: PAGE 1 OF 4 Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a. prerequisite to.the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and. attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of.property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: RECEIVED, JAN 1 8 2005 EDMONDS CITY CLERK APP O D FOR RECO B DATE: ` PAG OF 1. Description of Subject Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of IV • Gyl 9 y4 aC (insert street address); Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: r/iea �a,�•c�a �t 8e4 4 &Lk a6o 0 �Oa -TR i PI VS V d' L SEA ssbr AVEpFA SG No a69S9 h/f T'&d Y-s a9 S - GA/ OF /Or �5%R BGisi 5 6E '✓V GFV62041 OF fr -5 o f O F I- oT- lo T H W. 7-14 P'b y o ZI o /Uw 60 G .2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number 2'`��J (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of AP P O FOR RECO BY DATE: PA OF the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, - limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability. associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of. all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or, damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or. off the site resulting from. or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or AP PRO D FOR RECO G: . B PA arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS,. their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order, to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification . and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject. tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. APP O D FOR RECO IN ,:9( B DATE:�W PAGE OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF -Srohs ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 9 y O 25 L:\TEMP�BUILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT Notary Public State of Washingtory KALE G SMITH MY Appointment Expires Sep 9, 2008 APPRO D FOR RECO IN . B DATE: PAG OF DONE this ` day of y OWNER(S) By: By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF _ -3 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A,,✓/ &1;4- signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this �9 day of S,,o� ter- ,499_� NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 0 L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADOR\COVENANT Notary Public State Of Washington KALE G SMITH My Appointment Expires Sep 9, 2008 August 8, 2013 Mr. Paul Dent 16330 — 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 ROBINSON NOBLE AUG 0 9 2013 k1fJ ET BUH.DIN(i.DEPAt�ilAAENT C TY OF EDMONDS. VILE .Plan Review of Storm Sewer Discharge Line and Wintertime Grading Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75' Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A Dear Mr. Dent: This letter provides our storm sewer drainage comments regarding the planned project at 16330 — 751h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. There is an existing residence at the site and you plan to increase the size of the living space and add a garage. We have previously prepared a geotechnical report, dated March 12, 2012. We have completed a plan review letter and minimum risk statement, dated February 14, 2013. The city has requested that we evaluate the storm -sewer design and outfall. Geotechnical Drainage Plan Review We have been provided the following completed plan sheets: • C1.0 of 2, DR Strong, dated 8/2/13 • C2.0 of 2; DR Strong, dated 8/2/13 Surface water will be collected in grates and yard drains, and discharge at the bottom of the slope near the railroad tracks. Footing drains and roof downspout drains will be connected to this system. The storm sewer will be installed below the ground surface and will be anchored with concrete blocks as shown on the plans. The discharge is also shown on the plans and will allow water to flow into the drainage ditch. Rock spalls may be required to reduce erosion at the end of the pipe. This will be evaluated in the field by the geotechnical engineer. It is our opinion the storm drain line is adequately designed for this project. Periodic inspection of the pipe is suggested to reduce infiltration into the subsurface soils. Wintertime Grading The planned improvements will require excavation cuts that will be covered with plastic. All staging areas will be secured with rock spalls, hay bales and silt fencing. Any stockpiles on site 3011 South Huson Street, Suite A 17625 130`" Avenue NE, Suite 102 Tacoma, Washington 98409 www.robinson-noble.com Woodinville, Washington 98072 P: 253.475.7711 1 F: 253.472.5846 P: 425,488.0590 1 F: 425.488.2330 Plan Review of Storm Sewer Discharge Line and Wintertime Grading 16330 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A August 8, 2013 Page 2 will be covered with plastic. It is our opinion that the planned erosion control measures should be adequate for wet season grading: . We do expect that additional cost will incur from construction in the winter. This could be from additional rock spalls, plastic, overexcavation, etc. We recommend that additional contingency be planned in your budget for wintertime construction. The slope of the excavation cuts should be reviewed in the field by the geotechnical engineer to evaluate 'if stable temporary cuts can be made. We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, Robinson Noble, Inc. Rick B. Powell, PE Principal Engineer RBP:am Two Copies Submitted .91 Robinson Noble, Inc. .' ROBINSON- NOBLE February 14, 2013 Mr. Paul Dent E";T tr R. E E T FILE 16330 — 751h Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Revised Plan Review and Mitigation Statement of Risk Letter Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A Dear Mr. Dent: FEB 14 2013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER This letter provides our comments regarding the planned project at 16330 — 75" Place West in Edmonds, Washington. There is an existing residence at the site and you plan to increase the size of the living, space and add a garage. We have previously prepared a geotechnical report, dated March 12, 2012. You have requested that we complete this geotechnical review and statement of risk. Geotechnical Plan Review We have been provided the following completed plan sheets: • 1.0 of 2, DR Strong, dated 11 /7/12 • 10 sheets, Design Lines, dated 2/6/13 • 6 sheets (S1.1, S1.2, S1.3, S2, S3 and S4), Sound Structural Solutions, dated 2/5/13 The main portion of the project will consist of an addition located on the east side of the existing structure. Additional living space is planned and will consist of slightly excavating into the hillside. Conventional foundations are planned for the residential home addition with a small retaining wall supporting the existing slope east of the house. Surface water will be collected in grates and yard drains, and discharge at the bottom of the slope near the railroad tracks. Footing drains and roof downspout drains Will be connected to this system. The excavation cut to allow construction of the basement retaining wall appears to be feasible because the temporary cut has been reduced. We understand you have obtained permission from your neighbor to temporarily remove portions of the existing rockery during the construction phase. The rockery will be restored to the current or planned condition. It is our 3011 South Huson Street, Suite A 17625 1301° Avenue NE, Suite 102 Tacoma, Washington 98409 www.robinson-noble.com Woodinville, Washington 98072 P: 253.475.7711 1 F: 253.472.5846 P: 425.488.0599 1 F: 425.488.2330 Revised Plan Review Letter and Mitigation Statement of Risk 16330 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A February 14, 2013 Page 2 opinion that the project has been designed in accordance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report based on our review of geotechnical aspects of the provided plans. 11 Geotechnical Hazard Identification/Declaration & Mitigation Statement of Risk from Geotechnical Engineer The City has requested that we provide disclosure letters addressing the provisions of ECDC 23.80 for geologically hazardous areas. City Request I Geotechnical Consultant Comment In her/his judgment the plans and specifications prepared by the structural engineer conform to the recommendation in the geotechnical report That the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimized subject to the conditions set forth in the report and that the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. Minimized shall mean the applicant has utilized best available science and commonly accepted engineering and architectural practice to minimize; to the extent possible, the risks associated with development of the pFoperty. The statement shall include, as a condition, an evaluation setting forth the statistical probability (percentage) of earth movement within a 25 year period, the susceptibility of the risk, or hazard to correction, by on -site improvement's and the measures taken to mitigate the risk or hazard. Yes The risk of soil instability will be minimized for the planned addition. The planned addition will improve the local stability of the small slope east of the residence. We also expect a stability improvement because the storm water will be collected on impervious surfaces and routed down the hillside to the toe of the slope. The planned improvements are an addition to the existing residence. We understand, from review of previous geotechnical reports, that this area has a 30% probability of movement in a 25-year period. We attempted to obtain the statistical sources to this information but we could not understand how this was obtained for this site. However, if the existing site has 30% probability of movement in a 25-year period, then the new improvements should slightly lower the probability. because the localized slope will be buttressed with a retaining wall and the collected storm water will be directed to the toe of the slope near the railroad tracks. Therefore, less water will infiltrate into the slide mass. Robinson Noble, Inc. 0 • Revised Plan Review Letter and Mitigation Statement of Risk 16330 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A February 14, 2013 Page 3 The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide a statement about the adequacy of the plan with respect to site conditions and report findings. From the guidelines in the 2007 Landau Summary Report; an identification of landslide hazards applicable to the site, the on -site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as applicable, and, measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards. For sites where the hazards are'not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or large- scale earth movement cannot be practically reduced by individual lot owners, the statement shall identify what hazards could not be addressed by individual lot development. The statement shall specify any risks from earth movement that are not fully mitigated by design measures and render an opinion as to whether the site will be stable within the meaning of the ordinance following installation of all proposed improvements. It is our opinion that the erosion control plan is adequate for this site with the planned minimal grading and minimal site disturbance. The erosion control plan should be modified during construction if signs of erosion do occur. Best Management Practices should be used to control erosion. The geotechnical report was prepared to address the existing risk to the site. The existing residence lies within a known landslide and the owner has decided to improve the existing house with an addition. The addition will improve the local stability of the small slope east of the existing residence. Also all the storm water collected from impervious surfaces will be routed down the hill to the toe of the slope adjacent to the railroad tracks. In our opinion the improvements will reduce the risk of the localized landslide hazard movement but will probably not significantly improve the larger Meadowdale slide complex. We cannot mitigate for the deep-seated Meadowdale slide complex. Stabilization of the entire slide cannot be practically reduced by a single lot owner but small benefits can help the entire complex. The planned house addition will improve the localized existing slope and reduce the amount of surface water infiltrating into the existing landslide mass. Therefore, in our opinion the site will be more stable than the existing conditions and should satisfy the meaning of the ordinance. Robinson Noble, Inc. Revised Plan Review Letter and Mitigation Statement of Risk 16330 75' Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A February 14, 2013 Page 4 We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, Robinson Noble, Inc. vf. Rick B. Powell, PE Principal Engineer RBP:am Two Copies Submitted Robinson Noble, Inc. January 8, 2013 Mr. Paul Dent 16330 — 7511 Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 450 ROBINSON' NOBLE WD 2-013 -6) 011 STREET FILE Plan Review Letter Proposed Single Family Residential Addition' 16330 — 7511 Place West ��'��® Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A JAN 112013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Dear Mr. Dent: COUNTER This letter provides our comments regarding the planned project at 16330 — 751h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. There is an existing residence at the site and you plan to increase the size of the living space and add a garage. We have previously prepared a geotechnical report, dated March 12, 2012. You have requested that we complete this geotechnical review. We have been provided the completed plan sheets: • 1.0 of 2, DR Strong, dated 11 /7/12 • 10 sheets, Design Lines, dated 12/21/12 and 7/1/2010 • 6 sheets (S1.1, S1.2, S1.3, S2, S3 and S4), Sound Structural Solutions, dated 12/21/12 The main portion of the project will consist of an addition located on the east side of the existing structure. Additional living space is planned and will consist of excavating into the hillside and creating a daylight basement. The retaining wall is planned with Manta Ray anchors at the base of the wall for additional sliding stability. A slab -on -grade garage will be constructed east of the living space as specified in the plans. Surface water will be collected in grates and yard drains, and discharge at the bottom of the slope near the railroad tracks. We expect the footing drains and roof downspout drains will be connected to this system. 3011 South Huson Street, Suite A 17625 130'h Avenue NE, Suite 102 Tacoma, Washington 98409 www.robinson-noble.com Woodinville, Washington 98072 P: 253.475.77111 F: 253.472.5846 P: 425.488.05991 F: 425.488.2330 • .I Plan Review Letter 16330 7511 Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A January 8, 2013 Page 2 The excavation cut to allow construction of the basement retaining walls may be challenging especially on the south side of the storage room adjacent to the existing rockeries. Measures to remove the rockeries and to provide shoring may be required. The existing soils are medium stiff to stiff fine-grained soils; therefore, steep excavation cuts are not expected without additional stabilization measures. It is our opinion that the project has been designed in accordance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report based on our review of geotechnical aspects of the provided plans. We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, Robinson Noble, Inc. Rick B. Powell, PE Principal Engineer RBP:am Two Copies Submitted Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition Edmonds, Washington For Mr. Paul Dent • • ROBINSON- NOBLE March 12, 2012 Mr. Paul Dent 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington RN File No. 3000-030A Dear Mr. Dent: INTRODUCTION This report presents our geotechnical engineering investigation for your proposed residential addition project in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located within the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (NEES & LHA), at 16330 — 751h Place West, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. At your request, we have completed this report to evaluate the subsurface conditions in the vicinity of the planned addition, provide geotechnical recommendations for site development and evaluate the risks associated with development. You have provided us with a geotechnical report for the site by HWA Geosciences Inc., dated May 19, 2004 as well as a site plan showing the topography and location of the existing residence, prepared for the planned addition of a new deck at your residence. The site plan, dated August 25, 2004, was prepared by Western Surveyors, Inc. and was titled "Paul Dent". We have also received the City of Edmonds Earth Subsidence. Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA) packet. The ESLHA packet includes information, requirements, and regulations concerning construction within the landslide in your City of Edmonds neighborhood. We have reviewed Chapter 19.10 of the City of Edmonds Municipal Code and the "North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Summary Report, Edmonds, Washington" prepared by Landau Associates dated March 14, 2007. The code requires research of available geotechnical reports within 100 feet of the proposed development. The code also requires geologically hazardous areas within 200 feet of the proposed development be delineated. 3011 South Huson Street, Suite A 17625 13e Avenue, NE, Suite 102 Tacoma, Washington 98409 www.robinson-noble.com Woodinville, Washington 98072 P: 253.475.77111 F: 253.472,5846 P: 425:488.02551 F: 425.488.2330 Geotechnical Engineering Report0 . Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION You plan to construct an addition and a garage on the east side of the existing residence. The addition will be two stories with the lower floor being a partial daylight basement. You plan to have a slab -on -grade floor in the new addition. We expect some earthwork. will occur to excavate for the partial daylight basement and to regrade the slope within the footprint of the garage. The proposed garage is planned to be constructed on the graded slope and will connect with the top floor of the addition. A crawl space may exist under the garage floor. Architectural drawings of the project are not complete at this time. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions and present recommendations for site development. Specifically, our scope of services as outlined in our Services Agreement, dated February 3, 2009, includes the following: 1. Review available geologic maps of the area. 2. Review the provided geotechnical information. 3. Explore the subsurface conditions at the site with borings using a subcontracted limited access drill rig. 4. Evaluate the risk of distress to the addition resulting from movement of the landslide. 5. Provide recommendations for foundation support of the planned addition. 6. Provide recommendations for site preparation and grading. 7. Provide recommendations for drainage and erosion control. 8. Prepare a geotechnical report to document our findings, conclusions and recommendations. DOCUMENT REVIEW We reviewed the geotechnical full or partial documents provided to us for the area: • "Geotechncial Reconnaissance Report"; HWA Geosciehces Inc., May 19, 2004; (Dent Property) • "North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Summary Report" Landau Associates; March 14, 2007 • "Gogart Meadowdale lot" (16406 75' Place West); Cascade Geotechnical, January 8, 1990 • "Final Letter" (16406 75' Place West); Cascade Geotechnical, January 22, 1993 i • "Final Report" (16315 75' Place West), Terra Associates, Inc.; April 18, 1997 Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 3 • "Review of Plans" (16315 75`h Place West), Terra Associates, Inc.; November 6, 1995 • "Supplemental Geotechnical Consultation" (16315 75`h Place West), Terra Associates, Inc.; February 12, 1996 • "Final Letter" (16406 75`h Place West); Cascade Geotechnical, January 22, 1993 • "Geotechnical Study" (Scully Short Plat); Terra Associates, Inc., August 19 1987 • "Landslide at 16411 75`h Place W. "; Landau Associates; January 27, 1997 • "Slope Failure at 16411 75`h Place W."; Landau Associates; March 9, 1999 • "Geotechnical Report Nylander Property Remodel" (16411 75' Place West); HWA Geosciences, Inc., March 26, 2010"Geotechnical Addendum Letter Nylander Residence Remodel" (16411 75" Place West); HWA Geosciences, Inc., August 17, 2010 The NEES & LHA has been the subject of previous geotechnical studies by Roger Lowe and Associates and GeoEngineers, Inc. These studies provided evaluations of the slide and recommendations to increase the stability of the slide mass. The most significant recommendation for increasing the stability was the installation of drains within and adjacent to the slide mass. The Roger Lowe report included a map of the landslide where specific hazards were mapped, with an estimate of the probability of reoccurrence. The GeoEngineers report modified that map to reflect decreased reoccurrence probabilities based on the drainage improvements. We understand that these probabilities were derived from a qualitative assessment based on historical movements. They were not based on rigorous probability analysis. Prior to the drainage improvements, large scale landslide activity did exist in the area and in some cases damaged many homes and demolished some. CLASSIFICATION OF SITE WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDAU REPORT We have classified the site as a Zone A area in accordance with the "North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Summary Report"; by Landau Associates; dated March 14, 2007. We used Figure 1 of that report to identify hazards that need to be considered based on that zone classification. We list each hazard for that zone and our assessment in the bullet list below: • Zone A is subject to large scale slope instability derived from large movements within the landslide mass. Development within the NEES & LHA assumes that the overall deep seated landslide mass is stable. This is based on improvements created when the cut-off drains were installed in the NEES & LHA. Therefore the stability of this old landslide has been improved in recent years. To our knowledge, an engineered factor of safety has not been determined for this mechanism nor has any impact due to a design Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 4 seismic event been considered. These are part of the risks associated with development within the NEES & LHA. The landslide mass of Zone A can have loose zones that are susceptible to settlement and local slope instability. We encountered medium stiff to stiff soils in our explorations indicating that the site surficial soils consist of colluvium. However, by definition, the colluvium can vary in consistency due to the way it was deposited. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The roughly parallelogram shaped project site covers approximately 0.22 acres, with a maximum east -west length of 230 feet and a north -south length of 45 feet. The property is bordered to the east by 75th Place West, to the north and south by residential lots, and to the west by railroad tracks and Puget Sound further to the west. A layout of the site is shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The site slopes gently to steeply down to the west, as shown in Figure 6. The eastern approximate half of the site contains moderate slopes up to approximately 30 percent, before sloping steeply down to the west in the central region of the site. The steep slope inclinations were measured to be approximately 70 percent and are approximately 10 feet in height. The grades around the existing structure are considered to be gently sloping to flat. The western approximate one -quarter of the lot slopes moderately down at approximately 33 percent to a soldier pile wall with timber lagging. The pile wall is approximately 6 feet tall and is adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad on the east side of the Puget Sound. We expect the pile wall was designed and constructed to laterally support the landslide area but we have not reviewed the supporting documents. Small rockeries were also observed in the eastern half of the lot and were observed to be a maximum height of approximately 4 feet. Around the residential structure and the western half of the lot, manicured lawn and landscaping exist. In the eastern half of the lot, parking and landscaping areas exist above the steep slope. Native colluvial deposits are exposed on the face of the steep slope. We did not observe any indications of recent movement of the large slide blocks nor did we observe any'localized surfacial movement. The existing residence was built in the early 1960s and is supported on a conventional foundation that consists of a partial daylight basement. The interior floor is slab -on -grade. We completed a brief visual evaluation of the foundation and did not observe any signs of significant cracking. The foundation system appears to be performing as designed. Geology Most of the Puget Sound region was affected by past intrusion of continental glaciation. The last period of glaciation, the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, ended approximately 14,000 years ago. Prior to the Fraser Glaciation, non -glacial sediments, including interbedded mixtures Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 5 and layers of sand, silt, clay, and gravel were deposited and together with older glacial deposits, were subsequently overridden by the most recent glaciation. We reviewed the Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, by Mackey Smith, dated 1975. The site is shown to be located in a region where pre-Vashon geologic units of the Whidbey and Double Bluff Formations exist. Specifically, this site is mapped as being within a large landslide feature. Our subsurface explorations encountered stiff to hard silt at depths of approximately 15 to 20 feet within the steep slope area, consistent with pre-Vashon sediments/Whidbey Formation, and a medium stiff to stiff mixture of sand, silt, and gravel in the upper 15 to 20 feet of the explorations, consistent with colluvium or landslide debris. Explorations We explored subsurface conditions within the site on February 10, 2009, by drilling two borings with a portable hollow stem auger drill rig. The borings were drilled to depths of 16.5 and 21.5 feet below the ground surface. Samples were obtained from the borings at 5-foot intervals by driving a split spoon sampler with a 140-pound hammer dropping 30 inches. The number of blows required for penetration of three 6-inch intervals was recorded. If the number of blows reached 50 before the sampler was driven through any 6-inch interval, the sampler was not driven further. To determine the standard penetration number at that depth the number of blows required for the lower two intervals are summed. The borings were located in the field by a representative from this firm who also examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, and maintained logs of the borings. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented as Figure 3. The logs of the borings are presented in Figures 4 and 5. Subsurface Conditions A brief description of the conditions encountered in our explorations is included below. A more detailed description of the soils encountered can be found in the boring logs in Figures 4 and 5. Boring 1 was located near the base of the steep slope area, east of the existing residence. This exploration encountered a surficial layer of topsoil less than a foot in depth. Medium stiff, brown to gray silt with clay, sand, gravel and organics was encountered to a depth of approximately 12 feet. We interpret this material as colluvial soils. Below this material we encountered very stiff to hard clayey silt. This material was encountered to the depth explored at 21.5 feet. Boring 2 was located at the top of the steep slope area, in the eastern region of the site. Here we encountered a surficial layer of topsoil less than 1 foot in depth. Medium stiff colluvial soils were observed underlying the topsoil to depths of approximately 8 feet. Very stiff to hard clayey silt was encountered to the base of the exploration at 16.5 feet. Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical En ineeriRe ort 9 9 p Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 6 Hydrologic Conditions We observed groundwater seepage in Boring 1 at a depth of 3 feet. Boring 2 did not encounter groundwater. This groundwater observed in Boring 1 is considered to be perched over the underlying very stiff silt deposits. Perched water does not represent a regional groundwater "table" within the upper soil horizons. Volumes of perched groundwater vary depending upon the time of year and the upslope recharge conditions. We could not estimate seasonal high groundwater levels based on the information that we encountered. Boring 1 and Boring T.B.1 show the water levels at 3 and 8 feet, respectively. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS General NEES and LHA Hazard The landslide complex consists of historic block movements, slumps, and debris slides. This is a large-scale feature, approximately 3,000 feet long and 500 to 800 feet wide. The system includes large rotational slides extending through the underlying silt, with lateral movements within smaller landslide blocks. The blocks are composed of glacial till, outwash, and pre- Vashon silts, and the debris slides are. comprised of colluvium. Groundwater collection and diversion systems were installed in the early 1980's, and have helped to reduce the likelihood of landslide activity. We observed surrounding surface conditions within a minimum of 200 feet from the site to identify geologic hazards. To the east, just beyond the 200 foot distance from the site, we observed the scarp of the North Edmonds Slide. It should be understood that the entire NEES & LHA has not been stabilized by mechanical methods. It has been improved by dewatering, which increases the factor of safety. Since the existing house was built in the 1960's, it appears the house has not been affected by the landslide activity prior to the groundwater improvements in the 1980's. Nonetheless the risk of localized or deep-seated failures is real and could impact the new addition and garage and also the existing residence. Seismic Hazard It is our opinion based on our subsurface explorations that the Soil Profile in accordance with Table 1613.5.2 of the 2009 International Building Code (IBC) is Site Class D. As referenced in the 2009 IBC, we used the US Geological Survey program "Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra." That program uses 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions to obtain values for Ss, S,, Fa, and F, The seismic design parameters are: SS 122.9 % g S, 43.1 % g Fa 1.008 F 1.569 Robinson Noble, Inc. 0 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 - 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 7 Site specific coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration parameters apply as shown in Section 1613.5 of the IBC. Based on the USGS data and Tables 1613.5.60) and (2), the site has Seismic Design Category D. Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high ground water table. The fine-grained, medium stiff to hard soils interpreted to underlie the site are considered to have a low potential for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. Seismic activity can reactivate colluvium, causing debris flows and large, deep-seated failures. The impact that a seismic event would have on the deep seated slide complex is very difficult to evaluate and the accuracy of the numbers would not be known until after a major event. Erosion Hazard The erosion hazard criteria used for determination of affected areas includes soil type, slope gradient, vegetation cover, and ground water conditions: The erosion sensitivity is related to vegetative cover and the specific surface soil types (group classification), which are related to the underlying geologic soil units. We reviewed the Soil Survey of Snohomish County Area Washington by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) to determine the erosion hazard of the on - site soils. The site surface soils were classified using the SCS classification system as Unit 3 (Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes) and Unit 4 (Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loam, 25 to 70 percent slopes). The corresponding geologic unit for these soils is till and outwash. Our explorations encountered silt and silty sand near the ground surface. The erosion hazard for the soil is listed as being moderate to high for the sloping conditions at the site, which we consider appropriate for the site soils. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The subsurface soil conditions consist of colluvium, which has been described above as landslide debris. The colluvium will support the planned addition similar to the existing -house, but additional settlement or movement could occur because the nature of the subsurface_ soil deposits. Due�•,to-tle potential varying. conditions in this type of deposit, we_ recommend that the proposed addition be constructed with a stiffened "conventional" foundation_s_y_stem. and at least 2 feet of -structural., fill beneath the footings. -/The foundation would be better than the existing building foundation system that has performed reasonably well for nearly 50 years. The overexcavation and stiffened foundation system will reduce the potential for differential settlement and structural distress, but large scale landslide movement could cause the building to be uninhabitable. If constructed as proposed, and following these recommendations, the construction of the proposed residence should not negatively impact or affect adjacent, neighboring properties. We should be retained to observe all grading and excavation activities, including footing excavations and fill placement. Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineef Report 46 Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 - 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 8 We have not been provided with plans for the site showing the layout of the planned addition or how the planned addition will connect to the existing structure. Sure signs of settlement were not observed within the existing structure, the planned addition could be constructed on medium stiff or better colluvial deposits. Differential settlement between the existing and planned structure could occur. We have recommended overexcavation of the foundation for the planned addition to reduce the risk_ of settlement. FThe connection between the structure should-Ije rigid -to withstand possible differential settlement: ' IThe_structural engineer should? evaluate the connection between the planned addition and the existing residential structure: Site Preparations and Grading Site preparation should begin with the removal of vegetation, topsoil, and any loose material within the addition and garage. The excavated material should be removed from the site. The resulting subgrade should be compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition. Areas observed to pump or weave should be repaired prior to placing hard surfaces. The on -site soils likely to be exposed. during construction are considered highly moisture sensitive, and the surface will disturb easily when wet. We recommend that earthwork be conducted during the drier months. Additional expenses of wet weather or winter construction could include over -excavation and the use of imported fill or rock spalls. During wet weather, alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. These methods may include utilizing a smooth -bucket trackhoe to complete site stripping and diverting construction traffic around prepared subgrades. Disturbance to the prepared subgrade may be minimized by placing a layer of rock spalls or imported sand and gravel in traffic and roadway areas. Structural Fill General: �AII fill placed beneath buildings, pavements or other settlement_sensitive_features - -- should-lje placed as structural fill./ --Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed ^methods and standards, and is observevd by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field observation procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. 'Materials: _-Imported structural fill should consist of a free -draining granular soil, free of 'organics and other deleterious material, and be well graded to a maximum size= of approximately 3 inches. Imported all-weather structural fill should contain no more than 5 ; percent fines (soil finer than a Standard U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the' U.S. 3/4-inch sieve. We do not recommend the use of on -site soil as structural fill. (Fill -Placement: -Imported -structural- fill should be placed in 8- to 10-inch-thick uniform.lifts, and each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement, of$ (subsequent lif^t's The. structural fill. should.be_compacted ao;at'least 95_ percent _of its maximum _-. ,-� dry density'. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that -density-as, determined- by !he `-ASTM D1557 compaction test procedure. Fill_ more than 2 feet beneath sidewalks and_ pavement subgr6des-should-be compacted to afleast 90 percent -of the -maximum dry density,.) Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 - 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 9 The_moisture.content..of.-the-soil to -be compacted should be within -about 2_percent of optimum__.__.' so that a readily compactible condition-exi"s s It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet surficiial soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction. Temporary and Permanent Slopes Temporary cut slope stability is a function of many factors, such as the type and consistency of soils, depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the presence of surface or ground water. It is difficult under these variable conditions to estimate stable temporary cut slope geometry. Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations, since the contractor is continuously at the job site, able to observe the nature and condition of the cut slopes, and able to monitor the subsurface materials and groundwater conditions encountered. For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts in the fill soils and landslide debris be no steeper than 2.0 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (2H:1 V). If ground water seepage is encountered, we would expect that flatter inclinations would be necessary. Temporary shoring may be required to make the excavation cuts for the improvements. Shoring walls could consist of piles or possibly ecology blocks. We recommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include covering cut slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from the top of cut slopes. We do not recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than 4 feet, if worker access is necessary. We recommend that cut slope heights and inclinations conform to local and WISHA/OSHA standards. Foundations The on -site colluvium materials may have inconsistent densities by nature of the deposit. Wej recommend-thatfoundations be overexcavated at least-2-feet and replacedTwifh`granular structural fill. The foundations should be-suitably_reinforced to allow an unsupported u fondation span of 10 feetThese_measures will reduce the impact of potential differential settlement on the ct struure._(Tstructural fill should extend aminimum of-2-feet beyond the edges of they footings in" order to create a 1 H:1 V envelope from the base of the footings. Foundation widths of -at -least 1.5 feet are recommended and should conform._ o_.IBC--requirements. We recommend that all the footing be tied together and extra reinforcing be designed into the foundation to help reduce cracking. Also, a rigid connection should be designed between the new and old structures. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. (For-found-ations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design --bearing pressure of1,500`pounds,per-square foot (psf) be used _for_the_footing_design.JIBC guidelines should be followed when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Robinson Noble, Inc. is 0 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 10 Based on the performance of the existing structure, we expect the total settlement will be less than 1 inch and the differential will be less than 1/2 inch. These values are based on elastic soil consolidation from the additional pressure of the foundation. Large horizontal and vertical movement could occur if the localized or large landslide features move. Retaining Walls The lateral earth pressure acting on retaining walls is dependent on the nature and density of the soil behind the wall, the amount of lateral wall movement, which can occur as backfill is placed, and the inclination of the backfill. Walls that are free to yield at least one -thousandth of the height of the wall are in an "active" condition. Walls restrained from movement by stiffness or bracing are in an "at -rest" condition. Active earth pressure and at -rest earth pressure can be calculated based on equivalent fluid density. Equivalent fluid densities for active and at -rest earth pressure of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) and 70 pcf, respectively, may be used for design for a level backslope. These values assume that the on -site soils or imported granular fill are used for backfill, and that the wall back -fill is drained. The preceding values do not include the effects of surcharges, such as due to foundation loads or other surface loads. Slopes with a backslope of 3H:1V should be designed with an equivalent fluid densities for active and at -rest earth pressure of 65 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) and 95 pcf, respectively. Surcharge effects should be considered where appropriate. The above drained active and at -rest values should be increased by a uniform pressure of 6.3H and 21.2H psf, respectively, when considering seismic conditions. H represents the wall height. The above lateral pressures may be resisted by friction at the base of the wall and passive resistance against the foundation. A coefficient of friction of 0.3 may be used to determine the base friction in the native soils. An equivalent fluid density of 150 pcf may be used for passive resistance design. To achieve this value of passive pressure, the foundations should be poured "neat" against the native medium stiff soils, or compacted fill should be used as backfill against the front of the footing, and the soil in front of the wall should extend a horizontal distance at least equal to three times the foundation depth. A factor of safety of 2.0 has been applied to the passive pressure to account for required movements to generate these pressures. The friction coefficient does not include a factor of safety. All wall backfill should be well compacted. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess lateral soil pressures due to overcompaction of the wall backfill. Slabs -On -Grade _ Slab n g orade, areas. should be prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and 'Grading subsectionSlabs:_should,be supported on medium dense or firmer native soils, or on J ('structural fill extending to 'these=soils., It is recommended to reinforce the floor slab and - connect the slab to the foundation walls f Where moisture control is a concern, we recommend that slabs be underlain by 6 inches of free -draining coarse sand or pea gravel for use as a capillary break. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the capillary break. An additional 2-inch- r Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 751h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 11 thick damp sand blanket can be used to cover the vapor barrier to protect the membrane and to aid in curing the concrete. This will also help prevent cement paste bleeding down into the capillary break through joints or tears in the vapor barrier. The capillary break material should be connected to the footing drains to provide positive drainage. Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be taken and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. At a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: 1) Phase the soil, foundation, utility, and other work, requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the wet season (generally October through April). It should be noted that this typically increases the overall project cost. 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. 4) Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited, other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. Drainage We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces, such as roofs and the driveway, be collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. We suggest that the finished ground surface be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent minimum for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the addition, as indicated in IBC Section 1803.3. We recommend that footing drains be used around the addition at least 1 foot below the planned finished floor slab. Footing drains should consist of 4-inch-diameter, perforated PVC pipe that is surrounded by free -draining material, such as pea gravel. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point. For slabs -on - grade, a drainage path should be provided from the capillary break material to the footing drain system. Roof drains should not be connected to wall or footing drains. Robinson Noble, Inc. Geotechnical Engineerlipg Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75`h Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 12 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION We should be retained to provide observation and consultation services during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, and to provide recommendations for design changes, should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated. As part of our services, we would also evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and specifications. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Paul Dent and his agents, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report, for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We recommend that a geotechnical plan review be completed to confirm that the geotechnical parameters have been correctly included in the design. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our services have been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. Robinson Noble, Inc. 0 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Single Family Residential Addition 16330 — 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington March 12, 2012 RN File No. 3000-030A Page 13 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Robin n A le, Inc. L Jeff ale, PE Senior Project Engineer N Rick B. Powell, PE Principal Engineer JRW:RBP:am Three Copies Submitted Six Figures Robinson Noble, Inc. Vicinity Map PM: RBP Figure 1 March 2012 Vicinity Map ROBINSON" j NOBLE s000-osoA Paul Dent: 16330 -75th Place West . • CL e -�-+ v�/ I �'�reios• �a ♦,A h 4 _ 1 .. X O ez , o «• .. Q- U N Q J a. - Q RIO RISE N C _- cu fa N E E (u O c CD0" O O N O Q LL N ++ U N L rn ac L ac o 0 C (!� a Q a'c a •c F- O O s O O J LO Z W C C C -O fn M c o c E 0) x Wlcl) Ecu EcuEo 00 —j z_j z_j Qo 0 m ¢ 5 a Q CV Q m N CAM a�� r�i p; In O m O N I ` .p N 0 A cc ate" o ) u v - d a it U U) d M ntn z - Ow 66 m O 0z UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE- GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO.4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY -GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO.200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS * 1) Field classification is based on Dry -Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of soil in general to the touch accordance with ASTM D 2488-93. Moist- Damp, but no visible water * 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D 2487-93. Wet- Visible free water or saturated, 3) Descriptions of soil density or usually soil is obtained from consistency are based on below water table interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance, of soils, and/or test data. * Modifications have been applied to ASTM methods to describe sit and clay content. KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS — Letter symbol for soil type IML Contact between soil strata — (Dashed line indicates approximate contact between soils) Ground water level — Letter symbol for soil type • Blows required to drive MC (I�) = % Moisture = (�gM of water) sample 12 in. using SPT (Weight ofdry soil) DD = Dry Density NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual ,.�r� FM: RBF Figure 3 ROBINSON' March 2012 NOBLE 3000-030A Paul Dent: 16330 - 75th Place West Date 2/10/2009 Wle diameter 6" B-1 Logged by Jeff wale Ole depth 21.5' Driller CN Drilling Well diameter N/A Page 1 of 1 Elevation Well depth N/A LITHOLOGY / DESCRIPTION 0 vi Sample E o it Static Water Level w 0 Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot ■ Moisture contents 0 10 20 30 40 50 50+ Black silty sand with roots and organics (loose, wet) (Topsoil) Grayish brown silt with gravel and roots (medium stiff, moist) (Colluvium) Grayish brown silty fine to medium sand with gravel (medium dense, moist) (Colluvium) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Grayish brown silt with sand (medium stiff, wet) (Colluvium) SM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25— ' ---------- --------------------;-------- r -------- m ----------------------------------------------- ---------- _____ ML SM — ML Bluish gray silt (medium stiff, wet) (Colluvium) - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Bluish gray clayey silt with wood fragment (medium stiff, wet) (Colluvium) - wood fragment in tip Bluish gray clayey silt (very stiff, wet) i i i - becomes hard - rock plugged in tip ML — MH MH MH Boring completed at 21.5 feet Groun water encountered at 3.0 feet Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844-1977 Fax: (425) 844-1987 �k„Geotechnical, Inc. 17625-130 Ave NE, C-102 Woodinville, WA • 98032 Paul Dent Addition File Number 2765 Figure 4 Date 2/10/2009 Qle diameter 6" B-2 Logged by Jeff wale le depth 16.5' Driller CN Drilling Well diameter N/A ,age 1 of 1 Elevation Well depth N/A LITHOLOGY / DESCRIPTION c6 � Sample ?-', 0 ,z, Static Water Level w 0 Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot ■ Moisture contents 0 10 20 30 40 50 50+ 31ack silty sand with roots and organics (loose, wet) Topsoil) 3rown silt with roots (stiff, moist) (Colluvium) - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3rayish brown clayey silt (medium stiff, wet) Colluvium) --------------------- Bluish gray clayey silt (very stiff, wet) - becomes hard TS 1 2- 3- 4- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 -------------------- -------------------------------- r -------------------- +---------;--------------------------- ML — MH — MH MH 3oring completed at 16.5 feet around water was not encountered Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844-1977 Ge otec h n i ca I , Inc. Fax: (425) 844-1987 IV 17625-130 Ave NE, C-102 - Woodinville, WA - 98032 Paul Dent Addition File Number 2765 Figure 5 72 1 m C'• _ 1 o 7 1 O C' :� C� U m 0 of co C O_ O m O (6 u - += ._0 O -p O N Q cu E 'O N O) o °`gycm n CD Q 0. x cn Q wof \ r• \ m 2 O U) � O 0 CN'1 \o N V)cu \\ m E \ \ -0 \\ \\ N cu (D (6 \ \\ > CUC E C \ cnc w o 0 Z 0 C ' O co _rn U � LL N U N a O L LO U ~ 0 co co t0 C N 3 a r RESUB AUG 09 2013j�f� Z r gUIIDINt� DEpAFt�iAAENT r`� CITY OF EDMONDS Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc JONES LANG 4300 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 100 LASALLE. Fort Worth, Texas 76155-2685 tel +1 817-230-2600, fax +1 817 306-8265 STR"'EET FILE Tracking # 12-45900 Paul Dent Attention: Mr. PaulPaul Dent 16330 75th Place Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Dent: Enclosed please find one (1) fully executed Agreement for your file. A copy of the executed Agreement must be available upon request at the job site allowing authorization to do the work. Please contact Mr. Jason Winans, RoadMaster, at telephone (206) 625-6462 or cell (928) 220-1196 five (5) days in advance of entry and BEFORE YOU DIG, CALL 1-800-533-2891. If you need additional information please contact me at (817) 230-2631. Sincerely, .41 Tanita Thomas Associate Contract Specialist Enclosure cc: Jason Winans, BNSF 2454 Occidental Ave Seattle, WA 98134 • Tracking# 12-45900 PIPELINE LICENSE THIS PIPELINE LICENSE ("License") is made to be effective the 23`d day of January, 2013 (the "Effective Date") by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Licensor") and PAUL DENT, ("Licensee"). In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: GENERAL 1. Grant of License. Licensor hereby grants Licensee a non-exclusive license, subject to all rights, interests, and estates of third parties, including, without limitation, any leases, use rights, easements, liens, or other encumbrances, and upon the terms and conditions set forth below, to construct and maintain, in strict accordance with the drawings and specifications approved by Licensor as part of Licensee's application process (the "Drawings and Specifications'), One (1) pipeline, Four (4) inches in diameter (the "Pipeline'), across or along Licensor's rail corridor at or near the station of Edmonds, County of Snohomish, State of Washington, Line Segment 0050, Mile Post 21.17 as shown on the attached Drawing No. 1-55587, dated July 31, 2012, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference (the "Premises"). 2. Term. This License shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of twenty-five (25) years, subject to prior termination as hereinafter described. 3. Existing. Improvements. Licensee shall not disturb any improvements of Licensor or Licensor's existing lessees, licensees, easement beneficiaries or lien holders, if any, or interfere with the use, repair, maintenance or replacement of such improvements. 4. Use of the Premises. Licensee shall use the Premises solely for construction, maintenance, and use of the Pipeline in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications. The Pipeline shall carry DRAIN WATER, and Licensee shall not use the Pipeline to carry any other material or use the Premises for any other purpose. 5. Alterations. Except as set forth in this License, Licensee may not make any alterations to the Premises or permanently affix anything to the Premises or any buildings or other structures adjacent to the Premises without Licensor's prior written consent. COMPENSATION 6. License Fee. Licensee shall pay Licensor, prior to the Effective Date, the sum of Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3000) as compensation for the use of the Premises. 7. Costs and Expenses. 7.1 For the purpose of this License, "cost" or "costs" "expense or expenses" includes, but is not limited to, actual labor and material costs including all assignable additives, and material and supply costs at current value where used. 7.2 Licensee agrees to reimburse Licensor (pursuant to the terms of Section 8 below) for all costs and expenses incurred by Licensor in connection with Licensee's use of the Premises or the presence, construction and maintenance of the Pipeline, including but not limited to the furnishing of Licensor's flaggers and any vehicle rental costs incurred. Licensee shall bear the cost of flagger services and other .safety measures provided by Licensor, when deemed necessary by Licensor's representative. Flagging costs shall include, but not be limited to, the following: pay for at least an eight (8) hour basic day with time and one-half or double time for Form 424;10262012 . • • Tracking# 12-45900 overtime, rest days and holidays (as applicable); vacation allowance; paid holidays (as applicable); railway and unemployment insurance; public liability and property damage insurance; health and welfare benefits; transportation; meals; lodging and supervision. Negotiations for railway labor or collective bargaining agreements.and rate changes authorized by appropriate Federal authorities may increase flagging rates. Flagging rates in effect at the time of performance by the flaggers will .be used to calculate the flagging costs pursuant to this Section 7. B. Payment Terms. All invoices are due thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. In the event that Licensee shall fail to pay any monies due to Licensor within thirty (30) days after the invoice date, then Licensee shall pay interest on such unpaid sum from the due date until paid at an annual rate, equal to the lesser of (i) the prime rate last published in The Wall Street Journal in the preceding December plus two and one-half percent (2-1/2%), or (ii) the maximum rate permitted by law. LICENSOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS 9. Reserved Rights of Use. Licensor excepts and reserves the right, to be exercised by Licensorand any other parties who may obtain written permission or authority from Licensor: 9.1 to maintain, use, operate, repair, replace, modify and relocate any utility, power or communication pipelines/cables and appurtenances (other than the Pipeline) and other facilities or structures of like character upon, over, under or across the Premises existing as of the Effective Date; _ 9.2 to construct, maintain, renew, use, operate, change, modify and relocate any tracks or additional facilities, structures and related appurtenances upon, over, under or .across the Premises; or 9.3 to use the Premises in any manner as Licensor. in its sole discretion deems appropriate, provided Licensor uses all commercially reasonable efforts to avoid material interference with the use of the Premises by Licensee for the purpose specified in Section 4 above. 10. Right to Reauire Relocation. If at any time during the term of this License, Licensor shalt desire the use of its rail corridor in such a manner as would, in Licensor's reasonable opinion, be interfered with by the Pipeline, Licensee shall, at its sole expense, within thirty (30) days after. receiving written notice from Licensor to such effect, make such changes in the Pipeline as in the sole discr®etion of Licensor may be necessary to avoid interference with the proposed use: of Licensor's rail corridor, including, without limitation, the relocation of the Pipeline, or the construction of a new pipeline to replace the Pipeline. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee agrees to make all emergency changes and minor adjustments, as determined by Licensor in its sole discretion, to the Pipeline promptly upon Licensor's request. LICENSEE'S OPERATIONS 11. Construction and Maintenance of the Pipeline. 11.1 Licensee shall notify Licensor's Roadmaster, at 2454 Occidental Ave S Seattle, WA 98134, telephone (206) 625-6462, at least ten (10) business days prior to installation of the Pipeline and prior to entering the Premises for any subsequent maintenance thereon. In the event of emergency, Licensee shall notify Licensor of Licensee's entry onto the Premises at the telephone number above as soon as practicable and shall promptly thereafter follow up with written notice of such entry. 2 Form 424;10262012 • • Tracking# 12-45900 11.2 Licensee's on -site supervisors shall retain/maintain a fully executed copy of this License at all times while on the Premises. 11.3 While on the Premises, Licensee shall use only public roadways to cross from one side of Licensor's tracks to the other. 11.4 Any contractors or subcontractors performing work on the Pipeline or entering the Premises on behalf of Licensee shall be deemed servants and agents of Licensee for purposes of this License. 11.5 Under no conditions shall Licensee be permitted to conduct any tests, investigations or any other activity using mechanized equipment and/or machinery, or place or store any mechanized equipment, tools or other materials, within twenty-five (25) feet of the centerline of any railroad track on the Premises unless Licensee has obtained prior written approval from Licensor. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform all activities on and about the Premises in such a manner as not at any time to be a source of danger to or interference with (1) the existence or use of present or future tracks, roadbeds, or property of Licensor, (ii) the safe operation and activities of Licensor or existing third parties, or (iii) the rights or interests of third parties. If ordered to cease using the Premises at any time by Licensor's personnel due to any hazardous condition, Licensee shall immediately do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing right of Licensor, the parties agree that Licensor has no duty or obligation to monitor Licensee's use of the Premises to determine the safe nature thereof, it being solely Licensee's responsibility to ensure that Licensee's use of the Premises is safe. Neither the exercise nor the failure by Licensor to exercise any rights granted in this Section will alter the liability allocation provided by this License. 11.6 Licensee shall, at its sale cost and expense, construct and maintain the Pipeline in such a manner and of such material that it will not at any time be a source of danger to or interference with (i) the existence or use of present or future tracks, roadbeds, or property of Licensor, (ii) the safe operation and activities of Licensor or existing third parties, or (iii) the rights or interests of third parties. The construction of the Pipeline shall be completed within one (1) year of the Effective Date, and any subsequent maintenance shall be completed within one (1) year of initiation. Within fifteen (15) days after completion of the construction of the Pipeline or the performance of any subsequent maintenance thereon, Licensee shall, at Licensee's own cost and expense, restore the Premises to substantially their state as of the Effective Date, unless otherwise approved in advance by Licensor in writing. On or before expiration or termination of this License for any reason, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, surrender the Premises to Licensor pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 26 hereof. 11.7 Licensor may direct one or more of its field engineers to observe or inspect the construction and/or maintenance of the Pipeline at any time for compliance with the Drawings and Specifications and Legal Requirements (defined below). if ordered at any time to halt construction or maintenance of the Pipeline by Licensor's personnel due to non-compliance with the Drawings and Specifications or any other hazardous condition,, Licensee shall immediately do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing right of Licensor, the parties agree that Licensor has no duty or obligation to observe or inspect, or to halt work on, the Pipeline, it being solely Licensee's responsibility to ensure that the Pipeline is constructed and maintained in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and in a safe and workmanlike manner in compliance with all terms hereof. Neither the exercise of, nor the failure by Licensor to exercise, any right granted by this Section will alter in any way the liability allocation provided by this License. - If at any time Licensee shall, in the sole judgment of Licensor, fail to properly perform its obligations under this Section 11, Licensor may, at its option and at Licensee's sole expense, arrange for the performance of such work as it deems necessary for the safety of its operations and activities. Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for all costs and 3 Form 424; 10262012 Tracking# 12-45900 expenses of such work, pursuant to the terms of Section 8. Licensor's failure to perform any obligations of Licensee shall_ not after the liability allocation hereunder. 12. Boring and Excavation. 12.1 Prior to Licensee conducting any boring, excavation, or similar work on or about any portion of the Premises, Licensee shall explore the proposed location for such, work with hand tools to a depth of at least three (3) feet below the surface of the ground to determine whether pipelines or other structures exist below the surface, provided, however, that in lieu of the foregoing, Licensee shall have the right to use suitable detection equipment or other generally accepted industry practice (e.g., consulting with the, Underground Services Association) to determine the existence or location of pipelines and other subsurface structures prior to drilling or excavating with mechanized equipment. Licensee may request information from Licensor concerning the existence and approximate location of Licensor's underground lines, utilities, and pipelines at or near the vicinity of the proposed Pipeline by, contacting Licensor's Telecommunications Helpdesk at least thirty (30) business days prior to installation of the Pipeline. Upon receiving Licensee's timely request, Licensor will provide Licensee with the information Licensor has in its possession regarding any existing underground lines, utilities, and pipelines at or near the vicinity of the proposed Pipeline and, if applicable, identify the location of such lines on the Premises pursuant to Licensor's standard procedures. Licensor does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information relating to subsurface conditions, of the Premises and Licensee's operations will be subject at all times to the liability provisions herein. 12.2 For all bores greater than 26-inch diameter and at a depth less than 10.0 feet below bottom of rail, a soil investigation will need to be performed by Licensee and reviewed by Licensor prior to construction. This study is to. determine if granular material is present, and to prevent subsidence during the installation process. If the investigation determines in Licensor's reasonable opinion that granular material is present, Licensor may select a new location for Licensee's use, or may require Licensee to furnish for Licensor's review and approval, in its sole discretion, a remedial 'plan to deal with the granular material. Once Licensor has approved any such remedial plan in writing, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, carry out the approved plan in accordance with all terms thereof and hereof. 12.3 Any open hole, boring, or well constructed on the Premises by Licensee shall be safely covered and secured at all times when Licensee is not working in the actual vicinity thereof. Following completion of that portion of the work, all holes or borings constructed on the Premises by Licensee shall be: 12.3.1 filled in to surrounding ground level with compacted bentonite grout; or 12.3.2 otherwise secured or retired in accordance with any applicable Legal Requirement. No excavated materials may remain on Licensor's property for more than ten (10) days, but must be properly disposed of by Licensee in accordance with applicable Legal Requirements. LIABILITY AND INSURANCE 13. Liability and Indemnification. 13.1 For purposes of this License: (a) "Indemnitees" means Licensor and Licensor's affiliated companies, partners, successors, assigns, legal representatives, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, and agents; (b) "Liabilities" means all claims, liabilities, fines, penalties, costs, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, demands, judgments, and expenses (including, without limitation, court costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of investigation, removal and remediation, and governmental oversight costs) environmental or otherwise; and (c) "Licensee Parties" means Licensee or Licensee's officers, agents, invitees, 4 Form 424; 10262012 • Tracking# 12-45900 licensees, employees, or contractors, or any party directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or any party they control or exercise control over. 13.2 TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO,, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNITEES FOR, FROM, AND. AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES OF ANY NATURE, KIND, OR DESCRIPTION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING FROM, OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART): 13.2.1 THIS LICENSE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ITS ENVIRONMENTAL PROVISIONS, 13.2.2 ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS LICENSE, 13.2.3 LICENSEE'S OCCUPATION AND USE OF THE PREMISES, 13.2.4 THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION AND STATUS OF THE PREMISES CAUSED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY LICENSEE, OR 13.2.5 ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF ANY LICENSEE PARTY. 13.3 THE FOREGOING OBLIGATIONS OF LICENSEE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT LIABILITIES ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF ANY INDEMNITEE, BUT SHALL APPLY TO ALL OTHER LIABILITIES, INCLUDING THOSE ARISING FROM OR ATTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER NEGLIGENCE OF ANY INDEMNITEE. 13.4 TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, NOTWITHSTANDING THE LIMITATION IN SECTION 13.3, LICENSEE NOW AND FOREVER WAIVES ANY AND ALL CLAIMS THAT BY VIRTUE OF ENTERING INTO THIS LICENSE, LICENSOR IS A GENERATOR, OWNER, OPERATOR, ARRANGER, OR TRANSPORTER FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT, AS AMENDED ("CERCLA") OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS (DEFINED BELOW). LICENSEE WILL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD THE INDEMNITEES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL SUCH CLAIMS REGARDLESS OF THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE INDEMNITEES. NOTHING IN THIS LICENSE IS MEANT PY EITHER PARTY TO CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF ANY INDEMNITEE'S COMMON CARRIER DEFENSES AND THE LICENSE SHOULD NOT BE SO CONSTRUED. IN THE EVENT ANY AGENCY OR COURT CONSTRUES THE LICENSE TO BE A WAIVER OF ANY INDEMNITEE'S COMMON CARRIER DEFENSES, LICENSEE AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND DEFEND INDEMNITEES FOR ANY LIABILITIES RELATED TO THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THIS LICENSE. IN NO EVENT AS BETWEEN LICENSOR'AND LICENSEE AS TO USE OF THE PREMISES AS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS LICENSE SHALL LICENSOR BE RESPONSIBLE TO LICENSEE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF THE PREMISES. 13.5 IF ANY EMPLOYEE OF ANY LICENSEE PARTY ASSERTS THAT HE OR SHE IS AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY INDEMNITEE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD THE INDEMNITEES HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ANY LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART) ANY SUCH ASSERTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ASSERTIONS OF EMPLOYMENT BY AN. INDEMNITEE RELATED TO THE FOLLOWING OR ANY PROCEEDINGS THEREUNDER: THE FEDERAL EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT, THE SAFETY APPLIANCE ACT, THE LOCOMOTIVE INSPECTION ACT, THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT, AND ANY SIMILAR. STATE OR Form 424; 10262012 LJ • FEDERAL STATUTE. LICENSEE'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER REGARDLESS OF ANY NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL ACTS, ANY INDEMNITEE RELATED TO SUCH CAUSES OF ACTION. Tracking# 12.45900 THIS SECTION 13.6 ARE OR STRICT LIABILITY OF 13.6 Upon written notice from Licensor, Licensee agrees to assume the defense of any lawsuit or other proceeding brought against any Indemnitee by any entity, relating to any matter covered by this License for which Licensee has an obligation to assume liability for and/or save and hold harmless any Indemnitee. Licensee shall pay all costs and expenses incident to such defense, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, investigators' fees, litigation and appeal expenses, settlement payments, and amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments. 14, Personal Property Risk of Loss. ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT, OR RELATED MATERIALS UPON THE PREMISES WILL BE AT THE RISK OF LICENSEE ONLY, AND NO INDEMNITEE WILL BE LIABLE. FOR ANY DAMAGE THERETO OR THEFT THEREOF, WHETHER OR NOT DUE IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY INDEMNITEE. 15. insurance. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain during the life of this License the following insurance coverage: 15.1 Homeowners Insurance. The policy must be written on a Homeowners 2 -- Broad Form, ISO form number HO 00 02 05 01 or equivalent. The insurance must contain contractual liability with a combined single limit of $1,000,000. No other endorsements limiting coverage may be included on the policy. 15.2 Business Automobile Insurance. This insurance shall contain a combined single limit of at least $100,000 per occurrence, and include coverage for, but not limited to the following: ■ Bodily injury and property damage. • Any and all vehicles owned, used or hired. 15.3 Umbrella Insurance. The Homeowners and Auto insurance may be provided on a continuation of an umbrella insurance policy. Any such umbrella insurance policy shall provide that the coverage "follows form" to the underlying insurance and that such policy provides equivalent or broader coverage than that provided by such underlying insurance. 15.4 Railroad Protective Liability Insurance. This insurance shall name only Licensor as the Insured with coverage of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in the aggregate. The coverage obtained under this policy shall only be effective during the initial installation and/or construction of the Pipeline. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PIPELINE SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE. If further maintenance of the Pipeline is needed at a later date, an additional Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy shall be required. The policy shall be issued on a standard ISO form CG 00 35 12 03 and include the following: ■ Endorsed to include the Pollution Exclusion Amendment. ■ Endorsed to include the Limited Seepage and Pollution Endorsement. • Endorsed to include Evacuation Expense Coverage Endorsement. ■ No other endorsements restricting coverage may be added. • The original policy must be provided to Licensor prior to performing any work or services under this License. In lieu of providing a Railroad Protective Liability Policy, for a period of one (1) year from the Effective Date, Licensee may participate in Licensor's Blanket Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy available to Licensee or its contractor. The limits of coverage are the same as above. The cost is $1150. 6 Form 424; 10262012 E • Tracking# 12-45900 I elect to participate in Licensor's Blanket Policy; ❑ ' 1 elect not to participate in Licensor's Blanket Policy, 15.6 Other Requirements: 15.6.1 Where allowable by law, all policies (applying to coverage listed above) shall contain no exclusion for punitive damages. 15.6.2 Licensee agrees to waive its right of recovery against Licensor for all claims and suits against Licensor. In addition, its insurers, through the terms of the policy or policy endorsement, must waive their right of subrogation against Licensor for all claims and suits, and the certificate of insurance must reflect the waiver of subrogation endorsement. Licensee further waives its right of recovery, and its insurers must also waive their right of subrogation against Licensor for loss of Licensee's owned or leased property,. or property under Licensee's care, custody, or control. 15.6.3 Licensee is not allowed to self -insure without the prior written consent of Licensor. If granted by Licensor, any self -insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims shall be covered directly by Licensee in lieu of insurance. Any and all Licensor liabilities that would otherwise, in accordance with the provisions of this License, be covered by Licensee's insurance will be covered as if Licensee elected not to include a self -insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims. 15.6.4 Prior to entering the Premises, Licensee shall furnish to Licensor an acceptable certificate(s) of insurance including an original signature of the authorized representative evidencing the required coverage and endorsements. Licensee shall notify Licensor in writing'at least 30 days prior to any cancellation, non -renewal, substitution, or material alteration. In the event of a claim or lawsuit involving Licensor arising out of this License, Licensee will make available any required policy covering such claim or lawsuit. 15.6.5 Any insurance policy shall be written by a reputable Insurance company acceptable to Licensor or with a current Best's Guide Rating of A- and Class. VII or better, and authorized to do business in the state(s) in which the service is to be provided. 15.6.6 If coverage is purchased on a "claims made" basis, Licensee hereby agrees to maintain coverage in force for a minimum of three years after expiration or termination of this License. Annually, Licensee agrees to provide evidence of such coverage as required hereunder. 15.6.7 Licensee represents that this License has been thoroughly reviewed by Licensee's insurance agent(s)lbroker(s), who have been instructed by Licensee to procure the insurance. coverage required by this License. Allocated Loss Expense shall be in addition to all policy limits for coverages referenced above. 15.6.8 Not more frequently than once every five years, Licensor may reasonably modify the required insurance coverage to reflect then -current risk management practices in the railroad industry and underwriting practices in the insurance industry. 15.6.9 If any portion of the operation is to be subcontracted by Licensee, Licensee shall require that the subcontractor shall provide and maintain insurance coverages as set forth herein, naming Licensor as an additional insured, and shall - require that the subcontractor shall release, defend and indemnify Licensor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as Licensee is required to release, defend and indemnify Licensor herein. 7 Form 424; 10262012 • • Tracking# 12-45900 15.6.10 Failure to provide evidence as required by this Section 15 shall. entitle, but not require, Licensor to terminate this License immediately. Acceptance of a certificate that, does not comply with this Section shall not operate as a waiver of Licensee's obligations hereunder. 15.6.11 The fact that insurance (including, without limitation, self-insurance) is obtained by Licensee shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Licensee, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this License. Damages recoverable by Licensor shall not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage. 15.6.12 For purposes of this Section 15, Licensor shall mean "Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC", "BNSF Railway Company" and the subsidiaries, successors, assigns and affiliates of each. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS REGULATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS 16. Compliance with Laws Rulesand Regulations. 16.1 Licensee shall observe and comply with any and all laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances, orders, covenants, restrictions, or decisions of any court of competent jurisdiction ("Legal Requirements") relating to the construction, maintenance, and use of the Pipeline and the use of the Premises. 'A 6.2 Prior to entering the Premises, Licensee shall and shall cause its contractor(s) to comply with all of Licensor's applicable safety rules and regulations. Licensee must ensure that each of its employees, contractors, agents or invitees entering upon the Premises completes the safety training program at the Website "www.contractororientation.com" (the "Safety Orientation") within one year prior to entering upon the Premises. Additionally, Licensee must ensure that each and every employee of Licensee, its contractors, agents and invitees possess a card certifying completion of the Safety Orientation prior to entering upon the Premises. Licensee must renew the Safety Orientation annually. 16.3 Licensee shall obtain on or before the date it or its contractor enters the Premises, any and all additional rights -of way, easements, licenses and other agreements relating to the grant of rights and interests in and/or access to the Premises (collectively, the 'tights") and such other, rights, licenses, permits, authorizations, and approvals (including without limitation, any necessary local, state, federal or tribal authorizations and environmental permits) that are necessary in order to permit Licensee to construct, maintain, own and operate the Pipeline and otherwise to perform its obligations hereunder in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof. . 16.4 Licensee shall either require that the initial stated term of each such Rights be for a period that does not expire, in accordance with its ordinary terms, prior to the last day of the term of this License or, if the initial stated term of any such Right expires in accordance with its ordinary terms on a date earlier than the last day of the term of this License, Licensee shall, at its cost, exercise any renewal rights thereunder, or otherwise acquire such extensions, additions and/or .replacements as may be necessary, in order to cause the stated term thereof to be continued until a date that is not earlier than the last day of the term of this License. 16.5 Upon the expiration or termination of any Right that is necessary in order for Licensee to .own, operate or use the Pipeline in accordance with the terms and conditions of this License, this License thereby shall automatically expire upon such expiration or termination of the Right. a Form 424; 10262012 • Tracking# 12-45900 17. Environmental. 17.1 Licensee shall strictly comply with all federal, state and local environmental Legal Requirements and regulations in its use of the Premises, including, but not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), the Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, and CERCLA (collectively referred to as the "Environmental Laws"). Licensee shall not maintain a treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facility, or underground storage tank, as defined by Environmental Laws on the Premises. Licensee shall not release or suffer the release of oil or hazardous substances, as defined by Environmental Laws on or about the Premises. 17.2 Licensee covenants that it will not handle or transport "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substances", as "hazardous waste" and "hazardous substances" may now or in the future be defined by any federal, state, or local governmental agency or body through the Pipeline on Licensor's property. Licensee agrees periodically to furnish Licensor with proof, satisfactory to Licensor that Licensee is in compliance with the provisions of this Section. 17.3 Licensee shall give Licensor immediate notice to Licensor's Resource Operations Center at (800) 832-5452 of any known (i) release of hazardous substances on, from, or affecting the Premises, (ii) violation of Environmental Laws, or (iii) inspection or inquiry by governmental authorities charged with enforcing Environmental Laws with respect to Licensee's use of the Premises. Licensee shall use the best efforts to promptly respond to any release on, from, or affecting the Premises. Licensee also shall give Licensor immediate notice of all measures undertaken on behalf of Licensee to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such release or violation. 17.4 In the event that Licensor has notice from Licensee or otherwise of a release or violation of Environmental Laws arising in any way with respect to the Pipeline which occurred or may occur during the term of this License, Licensor may require Licensee, at Licensee's sole risk and expense, to take timely measures to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such 'release or violation affecting the Premises or Licensor's right-of-way. 17.5 Licensee shall promptly report to Licensor in writing any conditions or activities upon the Premises known to Licensee which create a risk of harm to persons, property or the environment and shall take whatever action is necessary to prevent injury to persons, property, or the environment arising out of such conditions or activities; provided, however, that Licensee's reporting to Licensor shall not relieve Licensee of any obligation whatsoever imposed on it by this License. Licensee shall promptly respond to Licensor's request for information regarding said conditions or activities. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES 18. No Warranties. 18.1 LICENSOR'S DUTIES AND WARRANTIES ARE LIMITED TO THOSE EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS LICENSE AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY IMPLIED DUTIES OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, NOW OR, IN THE FUTURE. NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES HAVE BEEN MADE BY LICENSOR OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS LICENSE. LICENSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH, RESPECT TO THE PREMISES OR WHICH MAY EXIST BY OPERATION OF LAW OR IN EQUITY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 18.2 LICENSOR MAKES NO WARRANTY, REPRESENTATION OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, CONCERNING (A) THE SCOPE OF THE LICENSE OR OTHER Form 424; 10262012 • • Tracking# 12-45900 RIGHTS GRANTED HEREUNDER TO LICENSEE OR (B) WHETHER OR NOT LICENSEE'S CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OWNERSHIP, USE.OR OPERATION OF THE PIPELINE WILL VIOLATE OR INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS, INTERESTS AND ESTATES OF THIRD PARTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LEASES, USE RIGHTS, EASEMENTS AND LIENS OF ANY THIRD PARTY. 19. Disclaimer of Warranty for Quiet Enioyment. LICENSOR DOES NOT WARRANT ITS TITLE TO THE PREMISES NOR UNDERTAKE TO DEFEND LICENSEE IN THE PEACEABLE POSSESSION OR USE THEREOF. NO COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT IS MADE. 20. Eviction at Risk of Licensee. In case of the eviction of Licensee by anyone owning, claiming title to, or claiming any interest in the Premises, or by the abandonment by Licensor of the affected rail corridor, Licensor shall not be liable (i) to refund Licensee any compensation paid hereunder, except for the pro- rata part of any recurring charge paid in advance, or (ii) for any. damage Licensee sustains in connection with the eviction. LIENS AND TAXES 21. Liens and Charges. Licensee shall promptly pay and discharge any and all liens arising out. of any construction, alterations or repairs done, suffered or permitted to be done by Licensee on Premises. Licensor is hereby authorized to post any notices or take any other action upon or with respect to Premises that is or may be permitted by law to prevent the attachment of any such liens to Premises; provided, however, that.failure of .Licensor to take any such action shall not relieve Licensee of any obligation or liability under this Section 21 or any other Section of this License. 22. Taxes. Licensee shall pay when due any taxes, assessments or other charges (collectively, "Taxes") levied or assessed by any governmental or quasi -governmental body upon the Pipeline or any other improvements constructed or installed on the Premises by or for Licensee (collectively, the "Improvements") or any Taxes levied or assessed against Licensor or the Premises that are attributable to the Improvements. DEFAULT, TERMINATION, AND SURRENDER 23. Default and Termination. In addition to and not in limitation of Licensor's right to terminate for failure to provide evidence of insurance as required pursuant to the terms of Section 15, the following events are also deemed to be events of default pursuant to which Licensor has the rightto terminate as set forth below: 23.1 If default shall be made in any of Licensee's covenants, agreements, or obligations contained in this License and Licensee shall fail to cure said default within thirty (30) days after written notice is provided to Licensee by Licensor, or in case of any assignment or transfer of this License in violation of.Section 26 below, Licensor may, at its option, terminate this License by serving five (5) days' notice in writing upon Licensee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensor shall have the right to terminate this License immediately in the event Licensee fails to provide evidence of insurance as required in Section 15. 23.2 Should Licensee not comply fully with the obligations of Section 17 regarding the handling or transporting of hazardous waste or hazardous material, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this License, Licensor may, at its option, terminate this License by serving five (5) days' notice of termination upon Licensee., 23.3 Any waiver by Licensor of any default or defaults shall not constitute a waiver of the right to terminate this License for any subsequent default or defaults, nor shall any such waiver in any way affect Licensor's ability to enforce any Section of this License. The remedy set forth in this Section 23 shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other remedies that Licensor may have at law or in equity. 10 Form 424; 10262012 • • . Tracking# 12-45900 23.4 In addition to and not in limitation of Licensor's rights to terminate this .License for failure to provide evidence of insurance or occurrence of defaults as described above, this License may be terminated by Licensor, .at any time, by serving thirty (30) days' written notice of termination upon Licensee. 23.5 This License may be terminated by Licensee upon execution of Licensor's then -current Mutual Termination Letter Agreement. Upon expiration of the time specified in such notice, this License and all rights of Licensee shall absolutely cease. 24. Surrender of the Premises. 24.1 On or before expiration or termination of this License for any reason, Licensee shall, at its sole . cost and expense: 24.1.1 if so directed by Licensor in writing, remove the Improvements, the Pipeline and all appurtenances thereto, or, at the sole discretion of Licensor, fill and cap or otherwise appropriately decommission the Pipeline with a method satisfactory to Licensor; 24.1.2 report and restore any damage to the Premises or Licensor's other property arising from, growing out of, or connected with Licensee's use of the Premises; 24.1.3 remedy any unsafe conditions on the Premises created or aggravated by Licensee; and 24.1.4 leave the Premises in substantially the condition which existed as of the Effective Date of this License. 24.2 Upon any expiration or termination of this License, if Licensee fails to surrender the Premises to Licensor or if Licensee fails to complete its obligations under Section 24.1 above (the "Restoration Obligations"), Licensee shall have a limited license to enter upon the Premises solely to the extent necessary for Licensee to complete the Restoration Obligations, and all liabilities and obligations of licensee hereunder shall continue in effect until the Premises are surrendered and the Restoration Obligations are completed. Neither termination nor expiration shall release Licensee from any liability or obligation under this License, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination, or, if later, the date when Licensee surrenders the Premises and. all of the Restoration Obligations are completed. 24.3 If Licensee shall fail within thirty (30) days after the date of such termination of its tenancy to complete the Restoratlon Obligations, then Licensor may, at its election (i) either remove the Pipeline and the Improvements or otherwise restore the, Premises, and in such event Licensee shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of bill therefor, reimburse Licensor for cost incurred, (ii) upon written notice to Licensee may take and hold the Pipeline and the Improvements and personal property as its sole property, without payment or obligation to Licensee therefor, or (iii) specifically enforce Licensee's obligation to restore and/or pursue any remedy at law or in equity against Licensee for failure to so restore. Further, in the event Licensor has consented to the Pipeline and the Improvements remaining on the Premises following termination, or in the event Licensor has elected to purchase the same as provided herein, Licensee shall, upon request by Licensor, provide a gill of Sale in a form acceptable to Licensor conveying the Pipeline and the Improvements to Licensor. MISCELLANEOUS 25. Successors and Assigns. All provisions contained in this License shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the respective successors and assigns of Licensor and Licensee to the same extent as if each such successor and assign was named a party to this License. 11 Form 424;10262012 • • Tracking# 1245900 26. Assignment. 26.1 Licensee may not sell, assign, transfer, or hypothecate this License or any right, obligation, or interest herein (either voluntarily or by operation of law, merger, or otherwise) without the prior written consent of Licensor, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by Licensor. Any attempted assignment by Licensee In violation of this Section 26 shall be a breach of this License and, in addition, shall be voidable by Licensor in its sole and absolute discretion. 26.2 For purposes of this Section 26, the word "assign" shall include without limitation (a) any sale of the equity interests of Licensee following which the equity interest holders of Licensee immediately prior to such sale own, directly or indirectly, less than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting equity interests of Licensee, (b) any sale of all or substantially all of the assets of (i) Licensee and (ii) to the extent such entities exist, Licensee's parent and subsidiaries, taken as. a whole, or (c) any reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation involving. Licensee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation following which the equity interest holders of Licensee immediately prior to such reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation own, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting equity interests of Licensee or any successor thereto or the entity resulting from such reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation shall not be deemed an assignment. THIS LICENSE SHALL NOT RUN WITH THE LAND WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF LICENSOR, SUCH CONSENT TO BE IN LICENSOR'S SOLE DISCRETION. 26.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 26.1 above or anything contained in this License to the contrary, in the event Licensee sells, assigns, transfers, or hypothecates this License or any interest herein in contravention of the provisions of this License (a "Purported Assignment") to another party (a "Purported Transferee"), the Purported Transferee's enjoyment of the rights and privileges granted under this License shall be deemed to be the purported Transferee's agreement to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this License, including but not limited to the obligation to comply with the provisions of Section 16 above concerning insurance requirements. In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing, Licensee, for itself, its successors and assigns, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Licensor for all Liabilities of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or related to (in whole or in part) a Purported Assignment.. 26.4 The provisions of this Section 26 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this License. 27. Notices. Any notice, Invoice, or other writing required or permitted to be given hereunder by one party to the other shall be in writing and the same shall be given and shall be deemed to have been served and given if (i) placed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, or (ii) deposited into the custody of a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, addressed to the party to be notified at the address for such party specified below, or to such other address as the party to be notified may designate by giving the other party no less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice of such change in address. If to Licensor: Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 4300 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 100 Fort Worth, TX 76155 Attn: Permits/Licenses 12 Form 424;10262012 • • Tracking# 12-45900 with a copy to: BNSF Railway Company 2500 Lou Menk Dr. — A0133 Fort Worth, TX 76131 Attn: Senior Manager Real Estate If to Licensee: Paul Dent 16330 75th Place Edmonds, WA 98026 Attn: Mr. Paul Dent 28. Survival. Neither termination nor expiration will release either party from any liability or obligation under this License,. whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination or expiration, or, if later, the date when the Pipeline and the Improvements are removed and the Premises are restored to its condition as of the Effective Date. 29, Recordation. It is understood and agreed that this License shall not be placed or allowed to be placed on public record. 30. ApplicableLaw. All questions concerning the interpretation or application of provisions of this License shall be decided according to the substantive laws of the State of Texas without regard to conflicts of law provisions. 31. Severability. To the maximum extent possible, each provision of this License shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this License shall, be prohibited by, or held to be invalid under, applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective solely to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, and this shall not invalidate the remainder of such provision or any other provision of this License. 32. Integration. This License is the full and complete agreement between Licensor and Licensee with respect to all matters relating to Licensee's use of the Premises, and supersedes any and all other agreements between the parties hereto relating to Licensee's use of the Premises as described herein. However, nothing herein is intended to terminate any surviving obligation of Licensee or Licensee's obligation to defend and hold Licensor harmless in any prior written agreement between the parties. 33. Joint and Several Liability. In the event that Licensee consists of two or more parties, all the. covenants and agreements of Licensee herein contained shall be the joint and several covenants and agreements of such parties. 34. Waiver. The waiver by Licensor of the breach of any. provision herein by Licensee shall in no way impair the right of Licensor to enforce that provision for any subsequent breach thereof. 35. Interpretation. 35.1 This License shall be interpreted in a neutral manner, and not more strongly for or against any party based upon the source of the draftsmanship; both parties hereby agree that this License shall not be subject to the principle that a contract would be construed against the party which drafted the same. Article titles, headings to sections and paragraphs and the table of contents (if any) are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part or to affect the meaning or interpretation hereof. The Exhibits referred to herein shall be construed with and as an integral part of this License to the same extent as if they were set forth verbatim herein. 35.2 As used herein, "include", "includes" and "including" are .deemed to be followed by "without limitation whether or not they are in fact followed by such words or words of like import; "writing", "written" and comparable terms refer to printing, typing, lithography and other means 13 Form 424; 10262012 Tracking# 12-45900 of reproducing words in a visible form; references to any person are also to that person's successors and permitted assigns; "hereof% "herein"; "hereunder" and comparable terms refer to the entirety hereof and not to any particular article, section, or other subdivision hereof or attachment hereto; references to any gender include references to the masculine or feminine as the context requires; references to the plural include the singular and vice versa; and references to this License or other documents are as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time. 36. Counterparts. This License may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and the signature pages from any counterpart may be appended to any other counterpart to assemble fully executed documents, and counterparts of this License may also be exchanged via email or electronic facsimile machines and any email or electronic facsimile of any party's signature shall be deemed to be an original signature for all purposes. 37. Licensor's Representative. Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. is acting as representative for BNSF Railway Company. END OF PAGE - SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS 44 Form 424; 10262012 This License has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the date below each party's signature; to be effective, however, as of the Effective Date. LICENSOR: BNSF Railway Company, a Delaware corporation By: Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 4300 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 100 Fort Worth TX 76155 By: Ed Darter Vice President - National Accounts Title: Date: LICENSEE: PAUL DENT a Washington corporation By: 16330 75th Place Edmonds, WA 98026 By: " v Name: Title: Date: 1 I 15 Form 424; 10262012 TRANG NO., 12-45900 EXHIBIT."A ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND PAUL DENT SECTION: 06 GN R Y SCALE: 1 IN.= 100 FT. TOWNSHIP:_.27N rW15 NORTHWEST DIV. RANGE: 0_ 12 SCENIC SUBOIV. L.S. 0050 MERIDIAN: WILLM DATE 07/31/2012 = - a w rr C MP 21.17 ES 1220+95 1 Jed PROPERTY LINE �f ' ZVI �`„•�`'Y-`'`�' polls JG - 7 r, 6vi � - -r pe PROPERTY LINE TO Sr-1�~roi A •^ DESCRIPTION OF PIPELINE PIPELINE SHOWN BOLD CARRIER CASING CARRIER CASING PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE SIZE: 4 f - LENGTH ON R/W: 46' - CONTENTS: DER WORKING PRESSURE: GRAVITY PIPE MATERIAL: PVC - BURY: BASE/RAIL TO TOP OF PIPE SPECIFICATION/GRADE: SQU 80 _ BURY: NATURAL GROUND WALL THICKNESS: 0. 409BURY: ROADWAY DITCHES 3 COATING: - - CATHODIC PROTECTION NO VENTS: NUMBER -- SIZE - HEIGHT OF VENT ABOVE GROUND - NOTE: CASING TO BE TRENCHED AT EDMONDS COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH STATE OF WA JHL DRAWING NO. 1-55587 r i RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 1 IIIIII IIIII IIII! 11 111 Ilill IIIII !IIII Illil 1111 lilil it 111 illll IIII Ilil 200411030052 6 PGS 11-03-2004 09:20am $43.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #• I 3 to Grantor(s): (1)_ FA V 6 66:iV% (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds , • l Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec %5 Twn _Rna D Qtr W OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) (�i�s� 3 Q �Q �00 (2) Assessor's Tax Parce f 1D# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RE04DING BC D : ATE.. PAGE OF W Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State. Builiiing Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a. prerequisite to.the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and. attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: RECEIVED - JAN 1 82005 EDMONDS GTY CLERK 1. Description of Subiect Property. APP O D FOR RECO B DATE: l � ` PAG OF This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of / 63 30 7144 P �✓ - _ � 5 . tag 9,L aC (insert . street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: /VI e* JoJ. fe 6e4e 8Zk ado 0 -00 -TR 9 PI 0S VA& 56 4 Ir AVE d6lS-J D1f 7-&d a9 S - I.NOFF °r COQ F G07 /a 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies.within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number ��? 1 (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of APPIOR RECO BY DATE: PA OF . the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or. prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated.by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review, of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. I Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability. associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of. all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against` the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the . City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or. damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or AP PRO D FOR RECO G: . B DATE: D PA OF arising out - of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject. tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. LJ AP O D FOR RECO IN B : DATE:�L_T "T- PAG _4 OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF .s 's ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free. and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 2r'1 day of s�� , }ZO NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: L:\TEMPIBUILDING\MEADOVACOVENANT Notgry Public State of WosNngto6 KALE G SMITH MY AApolnt nerlt Explres Sep 9 2008 EPA PRO D FOR RECO IN .DATE:G OF DONE this 1 day of b y OWNER(S) By. By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Alt// &,,� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this 2� y a `l '-4 day of S,c,Q �c.,..,�ef-- ,499 NOTARY PUBLIC . My commission expires: �-o L:\TEMP\BUQ.DIIVGIMEADOw\COVENANr Notary Pubiic $tote of WasNngton KALE G SMITH My Appointment Expires Sep 9, 2008 WWGEOSCIENCES INC. riechnical Engineering • Hydrogeology • Geoenvironmentnl Services N1� ? - May 19, 2004 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 _ y Or l- Mr. Paul Dent 16330=75th Place :West Edmonds, Washington 98026 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Dent Property Deck Replacement 16330 75th Place West Edmonds, Washington Dear Paul; to Inspection & Testing RECEIVED MAY 2 7 2004 PERMIT COUNTER As requested, HWA GeoSciences Inc. (HWA) completed a site reconnaissance and cursory geotechnical evaluation of the rear (west) patio area of your (above -referenced) property in Meadowdale. The property is situated within the Meadowdale Landslide Complex (MLC), a known landslide hazard area. We understand that you are proposing to replace an existing, 40-year old, wooden deck on the west side of your house. The new deck will have the same dimensions and configuration as the old deck. The City of Edmonds requires that any new development in the MLC be completed in accordance with the permitting requirements of Chapter 19.05 of Edmonds Development Code (EDC), Building Requirements - Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas. OBSERVATIONS The following observations were made by Erik O. Andersen, P.E., during a site reconnaissance on May 14, 2004. At the time of the inspection, the old deck -had already been removed. The existing house is a 2-story, wood -frame construction, with stained cedar siding, and cast -in -place concrete spread footings. You indicated that the house was constructed in the early 1960's. There were no cracks noted in the exposed concrete stem walls along the north and south sides of the house. The ground surface adjacent to the house gently slopes down to the west at approximately 8H:1 V (horizontal:vertical). Approximately 20 feet west of the house, the ground slope increases to about 2.5H:1 V for approximately 101. feet vertically, and then returns to the gentle approximate 8H:1 V inclination. 19730 64th Avenue W , By inspection of the geomorphology of the area, the more steeply -sloping s01i�2oo5.,;= r v May 19, 2004 0 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 ground to the west of the house might be a fill. An approximately 16 ft (north/south) by 14 ft (east/west) concrete patio slab is situated on the west side of the house. There were no significant cracks, nor evidence of settlement in the concrete slab. Near the northwest and southwest corners of the slab, there were 2 holes in the slab, where posts for the old deck were supported. The actual sizes and depths of the 2 post footings were unknown at the time of our site reconnaissance. You indicated that the proposed new deck will be the same size as the old deck, approximately 16 ft (north/south) by 14 ft (east/west). The new deck will be at the 2'd floor level, directly above the concrete patio slab. The deck will be constructed with pressure -treated lumber and composite wood/plastic decking. The deck joists will be hung from the house on the east side, and they will be supported with a beam and two posts on the west side. You indicated that you propose to place the posts at the same location as the posts for the old deck were located. I probed the soil around the concrete slab using a `/ -inch diameter, pointed steel rod. The soil probe would typically penetrate the soil an average of 6 inches under body weight, with a maximum probe depth of 12 inches. I concluded from this probing that the soil around the patio was medium dense to dense, and capable of supporting the post footings. EXISTING SUBSURFACE INFORMATION We reviewed our files and our library of available consultant reports for existing subsurface information in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The following reports were reviewed: 1) Gogert Meadowdale Lot, 16300 Block 75 h Place West, Edmonds, Washington, consultant report by Cascade Geotechnical, dated January 8, 1990. The Cascade Geotechnical study was performed in support of development of the residence immediately to the south, at 16340 75`h Place West. Two borings were drilled on the property, which revealed about 11 feet of colluvium (existing landslide debris), underlain by medium dense to very dense/hard native sand and silt. A site plan and boring logs from this report are attached. 2) Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc., dated October 16, 1979. The Roger Lowe Associated study included a boring drilled along the west shoulder of 75`h Place West, near the 16400 block of 75`h Place West. The boring, (designated Boring 7 in the report), encountered about 24 feet of existing landslide debris over native hard clay. Roger Lowe concluded that the area the subject property lies within had a landslide hazard of ground failure of previously failed materials (i.e., 2004-067-21 Ir 2 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. May 19, 2004 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 CJ remobilization of existing landslide materials), with a probability of failure of 90 percent in 25 years. A log of Boring, 7 is attached to this report. 3) Report of Geotechnical Consultation, Property Value Appraisals and Assessments, Meadowdale Landslide Area, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by GeoEngineers Incorporated, dated February 28, 1985. The GeoEngineers study concluded that the installation of subsurface drainage improvements and sanitary sewers in the early 1980's (known as LID 210 Improvements) had resulted in a substantial decrease in the risk of landsliding in the MLC. GeoEngineers concluded that the area the subject property lies within had a probability of failure of 30 percent in a 25 year period. CONCLUSIONS AND. RECOMMENDATIONS We observed no surficial evidence of soil settlement or slope instability around the subject property or approximately 40-year old house. The proposed deck is the same size and configuration the old deck. It is our opinion that the new deck will not reduce the stability of the site or adjacent sites. We recommend the deck posts be supported on new, 12-inch (minimum) diameter cast - in -place footings. Sonotubes may be used to form the footings, however, the annular space between the excavation and the outside of the sonotube should also be filled with concrete. The footings should extend at least 18 inches below the top of the slab, for frost protection. The foundation soil (i.e., the bearing soil that is exposed at the base of the temporary excavation) should be compacted to a dense/hard condition prior to concrete placement. Provided that these recommendations are implemented in the deck replacement construction, there will be no increase in the potential for soil movement on the subject property or on adjacent properties. LIMITATIONS Our scope of work included a visual assessment and review of existing geotechnical information. Deep borings or other intrusive testing on the subject property may have indicated other conditions that are not apparent in a visual inspection. The interpretations in this report should not be construed as our warranty of the subsurface conditions. Experience has shown that soil and ground water conditions can vary significantly over small distances. If, during future site operations, subsurface conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein, HWA should be notified for review of the recommendations of this letter report, and revision of such if necessary. 2004-067-21 ►r 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. May 19, 2004 HWA Project No. 2004-067-21 The scope of work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site. O.O We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical engineering services on this project. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please contact the undersigned at (425) 774-0106. Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. 0AN , tL�ti .� • To �Z i "'GIST 36468 $Q �O r� F�sS�ONAL EXPIRES 08 / 18 / uV Erik O. Andersen, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer EOA:BEH:eoa ATTACHMENTS: WeA 16� I tit 1. Site Plan and Boring Logs from Gogert Meadowdale Lot, 16300 Block 75`h Place West, Edmonds, Washington, consultant report by Cascade Geotechnical, dated January 8, 1990, for the property at 16340 75`h Place West, 3 sheets. 2. Log of Boring 7 from Final Report, Landslide Hazards Investigation, Meadowdale Area, Edmonds, Washington, for the City of Edmonds, consultant report by Roger Lowe Associates, Inc., dated October 16, 1979, 2 sheets. 2004-067-21 Indoc 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. :fa w 1S3a 3�b�d y� S� J Q _ --- � 3 Z 7dZ! O� co `o 1 ^ Cn CD N \ N ^ O O Lu I I ^ M V Q t� co Q W w I ATS 30N3GIS38 I `r �O O I I co r_ m C tD U-) c N LO 0 LO 0 w CL z w 0 z c� C cr lL 0) co rn N_ C7 z Q T W cn w CC w Q° o M � x u O W CL. CL W ¢ Q -� W > J Q Ir m= N Q c � o z �o N Q1 M Q co o� O o ►Zy Zm J •O w c0 0� N O Qp } m 8 j N l% Q L V) z � i0 Z > z O � oO Q . J w aa N J d 3: 3 Q g z`w" U 3 z�� z } U Y w O p wo V N L7ag00 am w ►~i Q O rvC4 Q z LL/ O oUzz w Qoo,cr U Q ^Y 9 y Job No. 8q6 - 32G Date 10/04/89 GOGERT MEADOWD Boring N o.• 1 Dwrt. By HL.4 .;;Driller DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill TyF'e SKID MOUNTED Geo/Eng. P. JEWETT Hole 0 4" O.D. Fluid a Penetration o s o o Soil Description & Classification Notes a o � N 0 0 n m m I COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH MINOR GRAVEL, MOTTLED, 2 3 7 10 FRACTURED SILTS WITH SANDY MATRIX, LOOSE, DAMP TO 5 WET. 10/04/89 I 2 4 4 8 COLLUVIUM; SANDY SILTS WITH ORGANIC DEBRIS, LOGS, GRAY, SATURATED, LOOSE. 10 I SAND; GRAY, SATURATED, MEDIUM DENSE, VERY*FINE- 2 5 10 15 GRAINED, GRADES TO SILT WITH LAMINATES OF SAND, 15 GRAY. (SP-ML) I ` SILTY SAND; WITH SOME GRAVEL, GRAY, DAMP, DENSE, 8 12 18 30 GLACIAL TILL. (SM) j 20 f I SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINE SAND, GRAY, 10 30 40 VERY HARD, DAMP. (ML) T.D. = 25.0' Notes: CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL TEST BORING LOG A DIVISION Of CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC. Poge 1 of �_ GOGERT MEADOWDOE [Driller Job No. fig - 32G Date 10/04/89 IF Boring No. 2 Dwn.By HLA DRILLING UNLIMITED Drill Type SKID MOUNTED Goo/Eng. P. JEWETT Hole 0 4" 0. D. 7 - Fluid a > Q. E 0 Penetration- 0 Soil Description & Classification Notes `0 N, 0 cc 5 WOOD; *HIGH BLOW COUNTS IN LOG.. COLLUVIUM; FRACTURED SILT IN MATRIX OF VERY FINE SAND & SILT, MINOR TRACE ORGANICS, GRAY, DAMP. GRADATIONAL CONTACT SILT; WITH LAMINATES OF VERY FINESAND, GRAY, ASH LATER, STIFF DAMP. (ML) SILT; GRAY, VERY HARD, DAMP, MASSIVE. NQ SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML), SILT; AS ABOVE. (ML) 3 12 5* 17* 10 2 2 2 4 15 2 4 6 110 20 13 17 21 38 25 12 15 18 33 12 18 29 47 T.D. = 29.0' Notes CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL A DIVISION OF CASCADE TESTING LABORATORY. INC- TEST BORING LOG Page 1 Of I City of Edmonds - October if .A19 Plate A- wEST SIDE OF 1STH PLACE W. BORI"G SEVEN APPROXIMATELY 16400 BLOCK SURFACE ELEVATION 83 FEET (OA TLH thLLw ) DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT 0 1 1 2( 2' 3C 3 C 4C GRAPHIC LOG SOIL DESCRIPTION FI ST .Y T( ROGER LOWS RSSOCIRTES INC. LOG OF EXPLORATION Ci [; of Sd�nonds i Oc tc�er 16, :' BORING SEVEN CONTINUED DEPTH DRY BLOWS IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG 4 59 11111 CL Plate SOIL DESCRIPTION DARK GRAY CLAY (HARD ID VERY HAND, DRY TO DAI'r) WHI06EY FORMATION 45 _1 BORING TERMINATED AT 41.5 FEET ON 8/28/79 ROGER LOWE RSSOCIRTES INC. LOG OF EXPLOR;,- [ON ' l GEOSeCIENCESINC. Gcoeitrironn,e,ital Services •Inspection Testing ,�,:, Sys "�Qctober 5, 2004 Project No. 20047067-21 RECEIVED City of Edmonds Building Department 121 5`h Avenue North 0 - s 20Q Edmonds, Washington 98020 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf Subject: REPORT OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION Paul Dent Residence P.M. 4'6330=75t -P-lace_West ROrk AA Edmonds, Washington 98026 ,r/ Dear Ms. Graf: On October 5, 2004, Marcus Byers, P.E., of HWA GeoSciences Inc. performed a site visit for the purpose of verifying foundation soils for the proposed deck replacement at the residence of Mr. Paul Dent. Previously, HWA prepared a geotechnical reconnaissance report to satisfy the requirements of Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Development Code. At the time of our visit, two foundation excavations had been made by cutting through the existing concrete patio slab and excavating the soils below. The foundation excavations were approximately 18 inches by 18 inches square and extended to a depth of approximately 18 inches below the concrete slab. The exposed soils consisted of silt. Soil consistency was evaluated with a '/-inch diameter steel probe, which penetrated about 1 to 3-inches into the silt under full -body weight. In our opinion, the exposed soils are generally very stiff to hard and are suitable for supporting the proposed deck replacement. We do not anticipate that the deck replacement will impact slope stability in the vicinity. Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. 23/05 Marcus B. Byers, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer •1973,0 .'-6,4tti+Avenui M7�Sei Lyngwood; A 98033 ..5 42.5 .0 7 • ,"" 'ikcFax.� 425.774.2 }wgww:hwageosciences. U 0 c�- NQ,.5 j 11•r� f i.) k' bl tagy 1}LJ{! I 4 I �p a y y jl �o I l� gigs �I 'All .. RECEIVEt, Y CITY OF EDMONDS MAY 2 7 �� Building Division 121 5th Avenue North PERMIT COUNTFP Edmonds, WA 98020 MEADOWDALE LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA CONSULANT SELECTION FORM IN COMPLIANCE TO CITY ORDINANCE 2661 THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FIRM HAS BEEN CHOSEN BY THE OWNER(S) TO REVIEW THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION I/We have ade application with the City of Edmonds Building Division to cduct a in an area designated as a Critical Area as defined b the 9 Y Edmonds Community Development Code, or in the area mapped as the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area at, =l6 3 30 7 5'K Pl SW, Edmonds, Washington. As required by City Ordinance #2661 review of my application by an outside professional consultant is required to determine whether my permit submittals were prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices and compliance to Ordinance #2661 and ECDC 19.05 permit application requirements. I/We may chose the outside consulting firm for the required review from the approved list of geotechnical firms on file with the City. The City has provided the Meadowdale Landslide Area Professional Geotechnical Consultant Selection Book that includes the statement of qualifications and fee schedules of those firms. I understand that the City of Edmonds makes no recommendations to any one firm. After review of the statement of qualifications and fee schedules, I have chosen the firm of Lem Ja o A�i� t3a a4 t S cJV4 ggoago conduct the review of my project. As required by City Ordinance #3108 1 fully understand that I am responsible for paying 100 perce ewing fees of the consulting firm that I have chosen including fees connected it ,reviews. Signed: Owner ed: Owner Date 0 9 (WA I I state® You're in good hands. I affirm that the accuracy of all permit submittal information is warranted by the applicant/owner in a form which relieves the City and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such permit application submittals. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the City, all conclusions shall be those of the applicant/owner and her/his design professionals and, b) That the applicant /owner understands and accepts the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that they will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective lessees of structures on the site, of the slide potential of the area. Paul F Dent "W330 751P1 W, SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN M BEFORE ME 1 this 1 5T ay of ,-.-- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES: 3 Notary Pubk $.bta of UWshiaG" JOAN HYN6K My Appoinanent Expires Mar 24, 2008 R2853-1 s - � an l Zone Corner /Vo Flag No GRAPHIC SCALE o w m y (INS, NOTES: I 1c° - 20 n I.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATION; OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. 3.) THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS SHOWN SERVING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORDS. WE CANNOT CERTIFY TO THEIR ACCURACY AND/OR COMPLETENESS. BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING EXCAVATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, CALL A LOCATING SERVICE OR 1-800-424-5555 FOR VERIFICATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. O�-"PO=INITO,.,-12,9016,310,UIB- Front NTY SURVEY CONTROL SIdeS REBAR AND RPC 28.2' WRITCAL DATUM EAST OF CENTERLINE 757H. AVE. W. AT Rear NAVD-88 DRIVEWAY TO RES. 116315 AND 116311. Other EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE H� t METHOD OF SURVEY SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE INSTRUMENTA71ON LEICA TCRM-1105 ELECTRONIC TOTAL S7ATTON PRECISION MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 322-130-090 BASIS OF BEARING THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 751H PLACE W- AS IRE BEARING. OF N1659771E PER THE ROS AF/8310205001 j Propos{� zJ( a— _rim t OR1H PROPERTY LINE LOT 9 PER ROS BY . . .-- GROUP FOUR INC. AF($310205001 '• CaF \ ' RE7uMNG WALL SS 006 _ ) to �/ SITE ADDRESS: ' iGT.dO 75TH. PL w EDMONDS. WASHINGTON PARCEL NO. a5 � dS 1306000900 162TH ST W FND 4- SO. CONIC. MON w/ , 1-1/2- BRASS DISK. DOWN 0.5' IN CASE 7/15/04 AI IV l N67J5'43•w I Awl I •1 lr e^ _ I i ; A "Ifr m 1 *000 � : + (HOUSE / O• f. FND R/C = 91010011191 NW 484-W 227.74' / / N867454'W enR' RCAa '^STIL' 4�'CR SKV ALu1la /�(; . - -- - ' - - = / ! 20.66' _ 7/15/D# I + EXISTING HOUSE r F f--- y HOF ORo t10 f f . Q b I / / V ` , SOU 1N PROPERTY LINE PER ROS BY GROUP FOUR P/C. AF�151I1S5006 1, -1/I`('�_/' (AND SNawwSH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOT 10 bI CAUSE /26959 ENTITLED RUMIES VS BELL.) 2/ W 7 p `t/JQ(�ug1- I 89-111—A / b - - - - _ N er35'43• Ir 237er l . -------------------------------- --- I / FLNSD19435BAR ecaP 97-067—A-------- / HED RE BAR WIN FM 1;tr/ 58T35'437 SLCAP - NOT FOUND 164 TH ST W -- FND 4' sD. cx1Nc. LION w/ S9jF f-r-.! ,g: - I 1-1/2- BRASS 019K AND U.L '4f:o it ,4?. PUNCH. DOWN 0.14' IN CASE 7/15/04. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 9 /N BLOCK 60 OF MEADOW DALE BEACII ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN ggg �L n �y�1�t yyy CO VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PACE 3$ IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASMNGTON. rN TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREET ADJOING SND PWP07Y ON THE WEST, ALSO TDGE7HER WITH THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 20 IN BLOCK A OF ME40OWDALE TIDE LANDS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED W VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE 2$ IN SNOIINGSH COUNTY, WASHINCTON, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED SPECIAL EXCEPTION_ COUNTY BENCHYANK 02063 O (ENXERIME 75' 0/W TO HOUSE /16315 FND MAC NAIL WIN FLASHER G-4 PPROVE Y PLANNING q/ o y 3 n LEGEND SECTION CORNER NOT FND O FOUND MONUMENT/]CASE � FOUND R£B AR/CAP AS NOTED CENTERUN£ CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) lj� HOSE BIB IS WATER METER CONIFEROUS TREE 0000mo ROCK WALL ROCKERY C� CONCRETE . ;?.•:` :'� GRAVEL. ss SANITARY SEVER PROPERTY LINE — - — - — ROW CENTER LINE '--* FENCE LINE w.vv_ a_m +vw�w-v EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - INDEX CONTOURS CONTOURS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR: (425) ; a56-2700 PAUL DENT SW 114, SW1/4, SEC.5, T.27N., R.4E., W.1N. LAND USE CONSULTANTS EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTOi OWN. BY DATE REV. BY DATE PRO.IE'CT MANAGER SCA CIVIL ENGINEERS 0 LAND SURVEYORS WFL 08-25-04 1 CMC 09-01-04 R.O. CA MESS 1 =mac OR A�WING FI!£NAMF CNK: BY F.B. NO.�.K18 NO. SF1T.!to ••• 13000 HWY 99 SOUTH • EVERETT • WA • 98204 •:• - �c33d 7s� e� � ! �. ! • INTER -OFFICE COMM—.., CATIONS TO Harry whitcutt z> i R EET FILE Building Official DATE June 2LI, 19 75 FROM Richard H. Allen Assistant City Engineer a SUBJECT: Nelnon Remodel Permit for lf1_n0 75th It is our understanding from Mrs. Nelson that the plumbing addition is for r6ufr only and that they will not install plumbing fixtures until sewers are in the area or the septic tank is refurbished. RHA:mjr • RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 (IIIII I►1il IIIII IIIII Ilill IIIII illll IIIII Illii 1i►1.1 IIIII illll (III Ilil 200411030052 6 PGa 11-03-2004 09:20am $43.00 SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: I '575- 3 r� Grantor(s): (1) P� V Yam'" T (2) Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec Twn_Rn� D Y Qtr� OR . Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) (26 513 i 00 ,! �� . (2): Assessor's Tax Parcel. ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR REING' DATE: PAGE I OF (P Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to.the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and. attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: RECEIVED JAN 1 8 2005 EDMONDS CITY CLERK 0 APP O D FOR RECO B DATE: i �• PAG OF 1. Description of Subiect Property. .This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of / 63 30 7544 YLI ac (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: t 1t/iea�a�wcl%a �� Bead �Gk abo 0 •oo -TR 9 �I �S l/�� SEA •�t� AVEPFA S� NO a6111 WT& Y-5---o?l S Ml of L °r 1. �5iA8G�sr .45 d,�'T✓ Iv CAAGTSD/V OF Fr S of AIF 60F Ge)T Ia 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit Me number 2� �'-09-7 1 (insert number) on file with . the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of 11 • Ll APPP PE RECO BY DATE: PA OF the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing -maintenance on the part of any owner -or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or, other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and.the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability. associated with development, stating that they have fullyinformed informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the. property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the . City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or, damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or AP PRO D FOR RECO G: . B PA OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the. OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. [#A_ OF 1— STATE OF WASHINGTON ) / ss: COUNTY OF I certify that I know or havesatisfactory evidence that _ �( signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. -?4 / DATED this day of 5��r- t99, y NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 9 y O L:\TEMP\BUILDING\MEADOW\COVENANT Notary Public State of Washington, KALE G SMITH MY Appointment Expires Sep 9, 2Op8 APPROVED FOR IN B DATE: PAG OF DONE this day of 6 e� OWNER(S) By: By: By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF -3k) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Pe--t &;� - signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this day of 499L NOTARY PPUBLIC My commission expires: 0 L:\TEMP\BUII,DING\MEADOW\COVENANT Notary Public State Of Washington KALE G SMITH My Appointment Expires Sep 9, 2008 October 18, 2004 Paul Dent 2027 -196T" St. SW, R 6 Lynnwood, WA 98036 JRR Engineering, Inc. 18609 76`h Avenue West, Suite B Lynnwood, WA 98037-4149 Phone: (425) 697-5108 Fax: (425) 697- l SUBJECT: Disclosures & declarations, Lateral & Vertical Engineering on 14' X 16' deck, Dent Residence, Edmonds, WA, JRR # 04-43 Dear Mr. Dent: JRR Engineering, Inc., (JRR) understands the City requires a letter from JRR addressing the above subject deck construction. We believe the following addresses Edmonds Municipal Code 19.05.040B: On May 24, 2004, 1 Ronald K. Riach, P.E., stamped and signed calculations, details and specifications prepared and/or modified under my direct supervision for the construction of a 14'x16' deck. Subsequently, a geotechnical report has been provided and reviewed. The structural design requires an 18-inch diameter footing rather than the 12-inch called for in the report. The report allows compaction of the base prior to placing the footings and the design used a value of 2000 psf bearing capacity on "native" soils. The Geotechnical Engineer should confirm the bearing capacity prior to placing concrete. These were the only recommendations related to the structural design and are understood. I have explained to you that a slide would be a danger to life and property and may be a total loss. No earth movement was predicted in the report as long as design recommendations were followed. Please advise if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. Sincerely, JRR Engineering, Inc. ,0 94 p Al, E?MIREs 1a/2s72 Ronald K. Riach, P.E. \\Drafting\C\W ordtemp\0474AL02. doc GEOSCIENCES INC. ",Y �1 Geotechnt�nl engineering - Hydrogeology • Geoenvironmental Services Inspection Testing qx October 5, 2004 WA Project'.No..2004-067-21 RECEIVED lty of Edmonds Building Department OCT - 6 2004 5Avenue North `Edmonds, Washington 98020 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. '..: CITY OF EDMONDS Attention: Ms. Jeannine Graf Subject: REPORT OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION Paul Dent Residence 16330 751h Place West R®c Edmonds, Washington 98026 Dear Ms. Graf - On October 5, 2004, Marcus Byers, P.E., of HWA GeoSciences Inc. performed a site visit for the purpose of verifying foundation soils for the proposed deck replacement at the residence of Mr. Paul Dent. Previously, HWA prepared a geotechnical reconnaissance report to satisfy the requirements of Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Development Code. At the time of our visit, two foundation excavations had been made by cutting through the existing concrete patio slab and excavating the soils below. The foundation excavations were approximately 18 inches by 18 inches square and extended to a depth of approximately 18 inches below the concrete slab. The exposed soils consisted of silt. Soil consistency was evaluated with a'/ -inch diameter steel probe, which penetrated about 1 to 3-inches into the silt under full -body weight. In our opinion, the exposed soils are generally very stiff to hard and are suitable for supporting the proposed deck replacement. We do not anticipate that the deck replacement will impact slope stability in the vicinity. Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. re./23/05 Marcus B. Byers, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer fff • � ''Lynnwood,>WA-W OF ED�O� STREET FILE Memorandum r890 . 199� Date: September 27, 2004 To: Street File From: Ross Beckley, Planner Subject: Replacement of Non -Conforming Second -Story Deck @ 16330 75th Place West This memorandum has been written to document and clarify the circumstances regarding a current application to replace a non -conforming second -story deck at 16330 751h Place West. The current owners of the property and structure located at 16330 75th Place West have applied for a permit to replace a second -story deck that is non -conforming because it encroaches into the north sideyard setback. The owners and applicant removed the deck and had begun replacement work when a stop work order was issued for the project, at which time permit procedures were begun by the applicant under Plan Check 04-201. The applicant states that they want to and are proposing to replace the deck in the exact dimensions of the original deck that was there when they bought the house and do not propose to extend the deck beyond what was existing prior to removal of the deck. It is difficult for the City to verify what the exact dimensions of the non -conforming deck where at the time of its removal. Examination of historical records and permits, and examination of the remaining portions of the deck including location of joists, footings, etc. are the best means available. Documents obtained from the Snohomish County Assessor indicate that the decks dimensions were 15' (north -south) by 14' (east -west). The applicant's plans and the proposed replacement deck indicate that the deck was slightly larger and has different dimensions, which are 16' (north -south) by 14' (east -west). The permit application plans move the deck one -foot towards the house and one -foot south along the house. The replacement deck is not proposed to extend any further to the north and is proposed to be rebuilt aligned with the hand rail from the original deck, which establishes the northernmost part of the original deck. The issue at hand is whether the replacement deck will expand the non -conformity of the deck by extending further to the north than the original deck did, and the answer is no, it will not. The discrepancy between the measurements of the deck in the historical documents and in the current permit application for the deck replacement are moot since the non -conformity will not be increased. Please see the attached photographs that document the site and the location of the handrail, which establishes the northernmost section of the original deck and the point which any replacement deck may not extend beyond. n Ross Beckley �( Planner September 27, 2004 City of Edmonds Development Services Department Al, - 12ZAA -AA TR 9,- PLUS VAC 'SE A.S-1-0 A .-q l Y-E- 49 a e- s: n- a LOT.1'6i-TH'W TAP -6- 4110 - OR OF:.`LOT; 7 10 1. -CO.. M-,A,r Ar SALES PRICE DATt- --tNST -+%--W.O.P 'GRANTOR/SELLER GRANTEE/ PURCHASER c( ql/;Lt;- dop, 0- 9-31 -q q 23!1 �o o v I - 4�v - ,,:z en t�eA 5q-y-) 41. vi A/C# ---.0-Tl-.LER.00bLS TR , UCTLON-- Yk DATE B u I L-T- CONST. F6611 ROOF DIMENSION S.F. AREA CONDITION FACTOR VALUE b D9EP. N ET -VALUE 9 'tit- L/ H Q 0 a H o 0 o o o o .� o a H N C NOD .i GD H W O0 o0 N 040 m .. M Nri ri\11 E H O M O N O) C 0 C L O .1 > v � r 0'- �F waww4 uE� L m w ro N ro o w a� �Woawxawa En U) Ooo F O O F PG 00 0 0 0 0 0 H H �o N N 00 H ri rl z to F H (n 5 F a yHy W7 O O 4. N () la (3) H ro pD 14 00 POO 0 0 F F m U H ��mga,�,Nro cncnvHaaoav No 0 0 o W S4 a U' W 0) 00 Omr ru�rUn 4) o i m 0 L ro w o o a 1-U) W Q33 Cl) 00 O) CM Y - '0 N N a O W N M Y � 'M i C > v co vl H N U v H H F N �M a T N o 0 a r� v W 4 N� U W E > ro N a a u 0 "o 04 U) .1 ID 0 0 � it U) O) WNzz vwa '� a W uI >p z o NU) x (1) mamma° a "a., U CHa E+00 a)ma O a as H u .� v u ED. .. Z 'o .vc 04 O O'O N C xa) C 7„ro O) H ro m H� H� vE u a > NuE C.IW4 a rower aG �M 0 �a N•N. v �twvEu oA > W•� 1� 4 a iu L-r j'o om�4 aC Nb F� U-0) u)O W W aM aEF W a IWmmU> P7 a) HQ RCW m vri Q H H a r-1 ro O c r"1 °" O U W L p� s4 b � a o �4 0 �y N O0 ID W H >. a aQ o vN v U1 H E m o> U O o S4 W 0 ro v v N � N o � o o a ro tn a bw z O +4 x w� 0 H m a0 p O Uo LL+ �4 m w v rl W � fA Ln t Ln n 01m N N O � > U ro a ro N !7 U N 0 O� 0 ti4 fn U) a a w A o N N � 0 H ro H n � o ro ') E u v a a H � W m a Q Q aj v xrorow 0 Hrnap NQ 0 v H W Z O �b mN14 oo H ra 7i H r r au HwwE al 41ao1, 44 � ro ua [u r] H .; .;x x Q M� awwi3Oiu� K X't l4 roF WJ7W a MNx3W a D 'o 'o M w(D m S mID z r0 r R m O u n La O N• ro m rt W 0 G n 0 ro m(D a r n m rt a M m a z 0 w m at m 3 'd z 0 loN r 0 a3 11 LY�1 F tt" Ox 9 G m m C a b k 0 m 0 P. a v d m z f E n n O b N N M z 11 ID O n 11 En a 5m ro n v �C m b ro n H a H N 7777 co N - o n-'C� O 0 -<� - -' --- mm Mm mm ci ac " P. rtM H W n mma � mp. CY Cn w m m Fa km m 0co gym w 3 C \ .°a 10 + y ro t� (D n (D H N El [by m $ 1 G R q r M rn n a a N N o�m �+y N z 10 co :9 a 13 w n y C�y H ro H z H ,n v a n N K No w ro N W t� W R G �. < M rar 0' ro N G rt 1Orj{ a f"+ ro , �' W uoi z r m H r•—� N a or " l0 m m z":l a(D m r O R �•{ w l0 (y 1' " ro O z (D a a K (D 0g Orl rt wr z O O co W 0' rt n H m ,7 0 a D] La p n a a R 1'. t7 r '� 0 0 R O " J l< r ro 0 H z to /� \./ �. n 11 O 11 0 �v " O UI a b o m R �r 11 7 R £" "< C rt r O n H H R U () w y r "r m O 7 Y O x a a � i 0 n 0 y tl (D N .. O z a 0 H m r •• b �, ro n H. R r p O z (n a O H " m '*7 a am O ro ry o r �b my z O .. a • R H m a rt (1 `.( En 11 r m El O H ` ^ a " O ED N i N � r a ID .. N 0 0 H m o z li r h1 H H n R o r In o H w n] r p a `< C7 3 m n z 14 n ,n o F 0 " tr7y z 6 0 Co n w H < a U7 H m W i K z r q H M N 0 0 " o 0. z (aD O O Ea (D �--� a y y r C m 0-0 'ice H H o q 0 Y m m C [T7 H C 0 H 'z t0 In m M01 w y H H 7 m O w � O O N H Y N x1 O O z z0 M N C7 [n co m �e Ln H ll, 0 n °. a z z H O T� r w a o d 0 a � o(� x b o d W y w r y w r (p 11 r m x tro" H m7rC m o <n m n ro 'ID 0 C H a N N N N �[y8m 0 " 't0 N m01N ma1N v HC70 m< mp m N0 P It, 0IN bY7 p HH0 HHO 000 000 w H o 000 000 \—� \�j O M m m a w % /. d E ty,p 3 P. (D n (D W N W N w CC) H mUl H0) 111 En C7 ro 10 �P Vl kO �A Vl z C N ro o 000 000 1� O1 a 000 000 � m ci chi x W m ro0 ro Icy n n C7 p R R " C11 11 mm Inmm �] �1 J J 0 L' Oro d1 o o rli z w G 000 m o r o RN 000 000 pi o 4+ O 0 (D (D y r w r o Z r 0 H o w U N O C o O r r a O m (D h1 Ln a 10w m�'010 o aC �NO NFL•+00 �.J O Im rt ^r 00 000 C) (D O o C'! Vj w H d`n H Ga z Ul 0 0 m a C a (D m m r 0 z as a r r o to O N ,p w m r 0 0 0 I a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 i.. . " AP-PRAISAL DATA DEF iY !MONTH DAY..,i YEAR EMARKS:Ile . ..... J .. �. t GGGRR��GG4 - 1 fib; _ G,y Ca ,._... ..... 46 > ...._4..t..,... _. _ .. _......._ • Fa ..... t .. F.` - .... . Y i IN - j- M r . i. Ns� 71-r . . . . . . . . . . z N LN - ,� � ,�fi � o � (I � � - - �: „cam', \,tot zi . e u b� / " I ! I I ; , , 's, /ffP-4 f/7777 A " 14 -1 low - iv 1� • �J _ A(Y........ 1 1 Pill, s r i.. I r ' 9 I � I I � M ' f (O r• `.I O I y I pq t ppF I Y I I\ , y i Y � �r Off'..._......._....._.._�....__�.... .__. .._. _. . __.. ._ ..._._..._- - ._. $z £= 1-H ��mZm t�-tt� vI ��,�R ySLygyjjR moN �![T�� nmA ��:j"yQI �{py�Z"yy11' TpIN N�/'IC � eO2 Ag DAMP p8t�N Omg� �tp 4 m CO !q p 04� min Z»� NN 91 =7i� nix prZy� Ay = �Cf�l N m H E •' I • �� l y \ V) O O �Y Z^ -rT7 'L __.,-.- .......... ......_...,.... _..... .... .. .... w r GUILDING SEP Z ? Z004 ASSOCIATES NDAU September 17, 2004 City of Edmonds Community Services Department 250 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Atlas: Ms. Jeannine Graf Aft RE: REVIEW OF DENT DECK UNDER ECDC 19.05 PROVISIONS 16330 75TH AVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Ms. Graf: FjZF This letter provides our review comments related to a new deck at the Dent residence at 16330 75`h Avenue West in the Meadowdale area. We understand from the City of Edmonds Building Division that the deck is a replacement deck that was under construction earlier this year and work was halted prior to completion. The site is within the current mapped area governed by the Edmonds Community Developmental Code (ECDC) Chapter 19.05 for "Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area." INFORMATION REVIEWED The initial packet of information provided to us for review included: • A hand -drawn generalized site plan, no date, received May 27, 2004 at the City permit counter. • An unlabeled plat map by Group Four, Inc., apparently from 1991. • A geotechnical reconnaissance report by HWA Geosciences, Inc. dated May 19, 2004. This report is written specifically for the new deck. • A site plan with topography was not provided. Subsequently, in early September, we were provided with a site topographic survey by Western Surveyors, Inc. dated September 1, 2004. GENERAL CONSISTENCY WITH ECDC 19.05 PROVISIONS Because of the nature of the planned site development (a simple deck that will replace an existing deck), we are limiting our review to selected aspects of the ECDC 19.05 code provisions that could affect public safety on the subject property or other properties. We are not reviewing the deck application with respect to the complete list of submittal and geotechnical report requirements in the ECDC. It should be ENVIRONMENTAL I GEOTECHNICAL I NATURAL RESOURCES 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 778-0907 • fax (425) 778-6409 • www.landauinc.com SEATTLE • SPOKANE • TACOMA • PORTLAND noted that the property is in an area of previously failed materials, and that the property has been estimated to have a likelihood of failure of 30 percent in 25 years (GeoEngineers 1985 report and HWA Geoscience 2004). We generally concur with the statements made in the HWA Geosciences report regarding the site conditions and suitability for the new deck. However, the soil conditions are described as medium dense to dense based only on shallow hand probing. In contrast, boring logs from adjacent properties show soils that are loose to medium dense in the zone of the planned deck foundations, and portions of the planned deck area may be in areas of historically placed fill. Recommendations for new deck foundations in the HWA Geosciences report included a requirement to compact soil to dense/hard condition. This requirement may not have been practical with the soil conditions at the site. SUMMARY Site development. in the Meadowdale Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area requires an explicit statement of the stability of property and its development, including site improvements. The HWA Geosciences report identifies the project location within the Meadowdale Landslide Complex and concludes that the proposed construction will not reduce the stability of the site or adjacent sites, but does not contain a more detailed discussion of risk as called for in ECDC 19.05. It is Landau Associates' opinion that the Dent deck submittal does not need to satisfy all of the detailed requirements for site development stated in the ECDC 19.05, and the geotechnical report provided for this project adequately addresses the stability issue, given the nature of the new construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this review. Please call if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. By. d Deborah Ladd, P.E. Senior Engineer Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. Principal DL/DRS > -� vim, r y EXPIRESS IW101 CAL/ 7 9117/04 \\Edtndata\wproc\074\123\dent deck rev.doc 2 LANDAu ASSOCIATES . WAllstate® STOBIET7You're in good hands. "'hEI affirm that the accuracy of all permit submittal information is warranted by the applicant/owner in a form which relieves the City and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such permit application submittals. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the City, all conclusions shall be those of the applicant/owner and her/his design professionals and, b) That the applicant /owner understands and accepts the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and that they will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective lessees of structures on the site, of the slide potential of the area. Paul F Dent 16330 75`h PI W Edmonds, W,� 98026 SUBSCRIBIFD AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME �T 1 / this i ay of 0 y i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at COMMISSION EXPIRES:3, LL Notary► Pudic ;Beata of W"hwo" JOAN HVI4- W My AppohMwt Expires Mar 24, 2006 R2853-1 KAREN NELSON 16330 75th Pl. W. Edmonds, Wa. 98026 (206)743-7460 February 22, 1996 Jim Walker Don Fiene Engineering Div. City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Dear Don; Please find enclosed pictures of the property across the street from me and pictures of my property.* As you know I am very concerned about the water seepage that is appearing on my property. I have lived here for 20 some years and have never had water bubble up to the surface of the ground, no less be brown water. I appreciate your trips out to the house these last few weeks. Your last trip here I showed you the hole in the ground next to the road. The people across the street tried to fix the area by making a 6 inch trough running diagonally across their hill sloping to the south catch basin. I do not believe that is fixing the problem That water is flowing back north along the black tarp parallel to the road, draining into the sink hole. The hole is back again. My main concern is my property. My property can not take the added water draining down my drive on the south side on down to my back yard. I am no soil engineer but it is coming from across the street some how. I know it has rained a lot in the last few weeks, but as I have said, I have lived here for 20 years and it has rained hard and long before in the past 20 years. Regrading, removing trees, brush, diverting ground springs, creeks, etc. has to change the ability of the soil to absorb run off . The gentleman I talked to across the street seems reasonable and concerned, but I think the city needs to take a strong stand and not leave repairs to the discretion of the property owner. We aren't engineers you are. City of Edmonds Engineering Department has the experience, knowledge, personnel to step in and solve this problem Don, you have been very helpful and responded immediately. I appreciate your follow up on this. Please give me a call when you come up with a game plan. Best regards, Karen Nelson �1 � ` � �� , t 1 �� n'.i� �' �\ ., .._. ,� � �� ; - rem. � � ;, ` 1 -- _ t , L `�� . � ` , A . ,1� .. ` �� . (� a J '. Fr �,� . ` �1 ..`�V-•(-�' y • `� `' � � ' Via;•. - ,,� �. , t '.'N';. �- .�"^, 1. �~ .i• ` i_' 0 Mf Z- 4.1�' y,A tT PC7�: IT )I ,)I A 41' -se X'& 6,f ,g&4,W ✓ ZV4 rsQ �,ee T 5 A . ..STREET FILE (Copy Receipt I ! (Clerk's Date Stamp) SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR *tNG COUNTY STATE. OF WASHINGTON, SNOHOMISH County of King BUDDY J. LEUFKENS and JO ANN I.. LEUFKENS, his wife, Plaintiffs....... No.81-2-04386-9 vs WILLIAM R. NELSON and KAREN S. NELSON, his wife, et al. Subpoena Duces Tecum Defendant..-S.... The State of Washington to_-- James Adams, -Edmonds -Engineering Dept --------- Greeting: You are hereby commanded to appear in the court room of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, DP t-Nei-'-=�� =-R-56 lYo- Tud e---Presiding- Department __ g p g _-.-Presiding, on- the--===--13th . - -- dsy- of--- —Apr(1--------------------- morning 83 at=�9=15-=----- then and there to give evidence in a certain cause o'clock in the-------------------.---------...._ Buddy J. Leufkens and Jo Ann I. Leufkens are s wherein-------------- ------------------------------------------ _...------------------ Plaintiff ------ - Karen S. Nelson et al are s and----- -------------------- ------------------- .---------------------------- Defendant------ andyou are further directed and commanded to bring with you the following papers and documents now in your possession or under your control, viz:__any and all applications for a permit ..---_____-__--___________________-----_--____- to install or relocate a septic tank at the property located at 16330 - 75th Place West, Edmonds, WA, or 16330 - 76th Place West, Edmonds, WA. ----------------------------------------------------- -_-_-.------------------ ------ and to remain in attendance on said Court until ,discharged, and HEREIN FAIL NOT at YOUR PERIL. Dated at- Seattle --Washington, this-_ S/_l _.-___d f.. t....- __._Apr�..�_.__--_-_-.__-, 19_83 ------ [Name and Address for Window Envelope] F �... A� rvERSOrr --.......... plaintiffs Attorney(s) of Record for .................................... 1313 Washington Building Seattle, WA 98101 L_ J �206) 682 - 1533 ddress-----------------------.......-----....................--............. Seattle, Wash. 98................ STREET FILE Cam e /o-'L� _ . T o . fOAZTl5'C- T - Tf� S 0, L ,S / 6% _ - ®c 7- - ��/�C�ac/C�yL/Cs 7-,�ic�� C C� i� I RSCEI_Vg OCT 28 1 ii i N07E:!L% ••rnwars surwu mrsrrncrta rnsr x• +ss[ssa's rtecams na resmro •arnNaus rw�,�ax .cam a,ar ,an. vxau wSlrLaan •aL dr lia.� FPP Ra90M a'wMYa awocowr AE dw.,mw or aE PXALCr. J. SP[iUl /9strzw ru. a rsareso rnr N1 wa LUIRCIFD errs.0 el6Y AO• w �aao,Kf IIN fi'flK ufLv3 arm xa u AIJ .wm arr a< maws iara�ns ,, wiaoalE {4•f 41a,a15 4f 9N11M rbt .LL! rrD:V OR.uvAaE iD6 RA GYOROMG[ p�a11S /rLKW[YA,m.s. 1 r r>E m ro p�mr OiT1ID5 a ;A r1fF � GId flair SW(j eL Qa.NEO a aE Srotlr 1lIE NE 114 SEC77ON 24, TOWNSHIP ABA A==mamr axrwr&XMaa�a mae m ra■.r as o<sra �w,.e ■sr. r •mm aa■r r a - $ae mast araa,,trapr am■amr •r emu, rf avow w a■' wrxA arre•�¢ svi mr arcs a■n c+o �oIf� SS R.IM=46.02' NORTH PROP ui/Psimw cart I. N0.=37.87.' -- GROUP FOUR ev a•wtm 4 FW - .rrnaM p•� E. S.E.=38.15' i aae;mfri a I.E. S0.=38.04 BRICIt ! ■+ a■ W,4 � r,�'.. ,wn tad a swa smr sne po w er-t®1 I -RE TAl 4iG'- _ss__.- - my auaearas ss. . - swsarrw■,Irocrtroi: r t ...,. m rs•,ae awns �asrr an .FY;'•"'- i. � i ! 1� co 'AfiOV$i." i wumw;�ar as er •rrauroy� f ff .� �PA Tlt �ac.aarmr.ccwrr •awamr;5o ;` HCUSI' WI �\ I S c " ,� \ � ,� �1 ,' f�!s•r crewrc Uwsewr e!arrtJ ! � N � J ; A � � rx aon cs■ j CV m v v r r� ,• EX.. CANT CATWALK , a►rex - t,j ! �� 4'S4 W ' � U � N c c� PLASTjC� O C h '•� `�' : r�0 i 2 REBAR BcCAP' C " �943 + SHEDt � (REMbVEn . N, RANGE 4 E, W.M. LINE LOT 9 P/-R RCS BY AFN8310205001 WALL FND 4" SO. CONC. MON W/ 1-1/2" BRASS DISK. DOWN 0.5' IN CASE 7/15/04 16�TH ST If F,YD R/G = SNOHOMiSH COUNTY BENCHMARK 2063 ® CENTERLINE 75' D/' TO HOUSE fI015. SSMH RIM=78.15 ►JJ� K rnr ----- Nd735'43"W 20.58' 1 • �llll � r y ! r- V , 200.00 am sxm mu-= r , E , EXISTING HOU ' r rs1 CL C - 7 i5 04 G \ C = C w C� [ , SETtBACK / /-GRi�.NAL o $ m i7 Zj ; NORTH LINE i z c o` �= o c o■`:'�"`' f"".■a�.r Wd e� •�Q1s �twSe` y arw•a s+smr • av aasmav0°i"smo, swa i * 4 >- -O mr,w oo�a o ■ aw me !� ll rr C C"• w Q �'W aJ / �' SOUTH PRCPER-Y LINE PER RGS BY GROUP (T �ro� ��1�'✓ o'n FND MAC NAIL 6ti^7FT a L O" S Ob I FLASHER G-4 (� +.. FOUR INC. AF3512135008 I n - ` - �� ? p� O� �� (AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR T COURT I LOT 10 � � CAUSE #26959 ENTITLED RUDDIES ,VS BELL.) 89-1 11—A A FND .1 /2'' REBAR &CAP 9.35 IV s----------- ---- / ! 4 lcND 1/2' RCG.AR INI7H -- -.... -------------------------- I------,37.87 ---- "{ / fA 74\¢73--- W 2---- � CD co Oi vs _ tU cu c [Sti RY c- '" .^ ti7 =------------------------------------------- 3 .g C/j L C r o. „' o N'G( FOUND n SsmFI RIM- 4 >i<t' (ELE �" O.00' FOR O a C'�- fa.� v T I _ ROOr HT. CALCUt�77QI'1S) NORTH _ lu � m c" n ,Q / ! LE NO.=38.98' y 97 -067—A I FND 4" SG. CONC. MON NJ/ / a��E m p c / I.E. F.=39.31' 1 � T�� t 1--1/2" BRASS DISK AND °�'�_y Ur e='v�/i: v�^ti C 3--_—_--� — I.E. S0.=39.25' l S� I PUNCH. DOW1J'O.t4' IN CASE f p ? N - ]` - — - — a873543"E I 213_40' 7/15/04 I Qa D.R. STRONG / ,ty..trrvr .ow.vawmm o•ramm ra>orrm 4 ti W O j 4 121 En 4-5 Ck+ e- ors 4.07.. • ) n cj, t I (� �c A'q .... _ I I ne�frm er. od f3m m el. Ks PRO"r SWAM us RECEIVED � „�:w�' ssar C20 or 2 _ 04 2614 __.. ENGINEERING DIVISION 15 z Vi Lm E AOD w M jo.. P to 0 Co =a 0 z o (D (D 0 LU CD T 0 t5 0,16 E ca:E 4) UJ 0 r- SLT c a.E -wo 0, co 40- M;(!., M . :moo L . E a .-Z cL MA o cot. 0 — Lo (o C)- dy M .0 ri 4) cR E T �c W- E E :0). CO Cl) (D uvj < co 0 C) a — Cv 000 0 CN 0— O:s -E c) -,a 'D (_D -4-� C a o > way (nL 4- r_ V V I — m to . D L) c 0 0 L) into PR 4),.L Z CR Gi �: Z -r CL r_ z M �o cn o o CL -C,3 C,4 M E v co 0 r- CL m 0.0 E (D, 0- :3 1 0 4) L 4) � tco Z (D E 2 (8.9 t :3 cn CL- - - > > Lu M.0 8 m .2 (D E 4-i (,D. -J m N 2 B -C, t! $ O'er0 mu)z 46 '0 �65 Co "UC CO Z _j M U) , N> CL r J om J C/3 LAJ Lnu c q uj LU 0=D 2 (I- U CE: I uj LLI Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 sites designated within or near the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area shall be designated on this map which indicates areas of earth subsidence and landslide hazards in excess of normal allowances. In order to designate the subject project development site located at J(p330 7S4AN Edmonds, Washington, the following maps, surveys or other noted items below were used: • Geotechnical Report Prepared by • Land Survey Prepared b51vr✓e4or3 I i "I certify under penalty of perjury that the site location designation has been made to the best of my knowledge and belief, following an investigation of all information and documentation in my possession as well as reasonably obtainable information in the possession of others, including public agencies. Any information which would tend to designate a differing location for the site is attached as a part of my designation as well as all information upon which I reasonably relied." i /j Site Plotted by f61V1 O e4 Date 3 Signed Date 1 ?b 3 . I Title Vi L. 0 E W 00 m LM ca 0 Z P� I � C) CD Q) LD tg IS 0 E L) 0 a "c4 E cmi) LU� 0 - M Z -0- T c 4 o a o m cl. m '07 m 42 C= w c E E E 0 CR < m 0 4)� 2to 0 — Po co 0 C*4 L) 72 0 :5 r a M P 10 �5 -0 Z5 o 0 > uj, 6, r - (A"—Q) 'k F'? LE �zo o 0 C* CL z in, za -12 46 " g �b L- . L' t 0 0 a) �5 Cf) m r- (D CCL C: �-Nm' m N ta o =CL E 0 -a c Lo C, -S - 0 — 75 Mo E 3 0 co 'D (D. CS tl? 0 4g 0) 'OL 4) �: 0 "a > t UJ ul uj m m m ca (1) 0 CL.cu o CD 2 Co U) I co _0 m m m N if Z _3 c r I.J m i msl Mil-11 u- M�m Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 sites designated within or near the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area shall be designated on this map which indicates areas of earth subsidence and landslide hazards in excess of normal allowances. In order to designate the subject project development site located at I (p330 7Sk 1 p 1 W Edmonds, Washington, the following maps, surveys or other noted items below were used: • Geotechnical Report Prepared by R eb1^5c,� A • Land Survey Prepared by Wes+e,� ur✓eyor3 "I certify under penalty of perjury that the site location designation has been made to the best of my knowledge and belief, j following an investigation of all information and documentation in my possession as well as reasonably obtainable information in the possession of others, including public agencies. Any information which would tend to designate a differing location for the site is attached as a part of my designation as well as all information upon which I reasonably relied." Site Plotted by f4vt +� PxY� Date �3 Signed Date 1 3413 ` Title Owl, ,. §DATE RECEIVED. r 141 CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/ E OF BU NET J MAILING ADDRESS 3 30 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE MOtA NAME ii W t ADDRESS z 0 a a CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME i CBL 0 D S 6 OCITY ( ZIP NE (/TEELEPH STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIR ION DATE CK D Y �" C0 U 7 0 PROPERTY T ACCOUNT RC 13 j NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ❑ ADDITION ❑ COMMERCIAL ❑ CHANGE OF USE REMODE% ❑ MULTIFAMILY ❑. SIGN ❑ REPAIR ❑ GRADING ❑ FENCE CYDS X F� ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ TANK „L, /❑ GARAGE ❑ CARPORT RETAINING WALL ❑ SPRINKLER D , ROCKERY FIRE ALARM — (TYPE OF. USE, B NES ,OR ACTIVITY) EX INc '; e acPPC� 7 NUMBER '�. NUMBER OF . CRITICAL OF. DWELLING AREAS D STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE N HEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE 96 PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC a DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION; ISO DAYS PERMIT LIMIT: 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN /80 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, AS AND SUCCESORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS. EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY. FROM THE ISSUANCE. OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REOUIREME OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE C17Y'S ABILITY TO ENF ORDINANCE PROVISION.' I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE THIS ICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I A E OW OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMP NO STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN, DOING THE WO A ZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LA R OF THE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMP NS SURANCE RCW 8.27. SIGNATURE ( N AGENT) DATE SIGN D 1 w ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, UBC SECTION 1.08 . "` PERMIT EXPIRES uSE y') (' /� / PERMIT /� h �/77 ZONE r✓ `1 / 1 _...----- l'11/1� i��-^'/ I1`, /L JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS f (/I %O 25-ffn j�/ �/(� ew PLAT NAME/SUIBBDIVISIO•NJNO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP RW Pe Approved RW Permit Required 13 Q Street Use Permit Req'd a EXISTING PROPOSED Inspeetlon Required p Sidewalk Required C3 REOUIpfjEDl TION FT Underground ��vvfff Wiring required Q METE ZE/ E NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED O YES ❑ NO ❑ _ W REMARKS = 2 OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FO 0 CONTROL/DRAINAGE t, 5 DATE FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE I w is VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE ADBN INSPECTION BOND ,,..�....�.. REO'D YES ONO $ SEPA REVIEW SI N AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEKJPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED X �s 4 as' EX LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWEOD P FRONT/13EAR oNfq 3y JPOSE�._ 31 z PARKING REAP . PFIXED LOT AREA lJ[`� P NING REVIEW D Y DA�E� /� a. � q o y 7 REMARKS *CC. .d.4/1i1_41} id e 'e/.a1n"�pC e /F", V� Z/ is S (/f+ai ( (e ... 1^4k.1 1. CH KED BY TYPE 0 C T UCTION C E OCCUPANT GROUP SPECIAL INSPECTION OCCUPANT JAREA REQUIRED YES LOAD MARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D Q VALUATION $ V� Descriptionn FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge Building Permit O City Surcharge Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical Z Grading Engr. Review Q Engr. Inspection Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit 3 Fire Inspection Receipt # 2 Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due r Recording Fee Receipt # CALL FOR INSPECTION %-M 771-0220 EXT.1333 APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a'permit until signed.by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in apace provided. OF ICI GN T RE DATE EASED BY D . . ©�t ,�i , , JA �4 " / ORIGINAL -FILE YELL04-- INSPlICTOR PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR Pl�� • BM SNOHOMISH COUNTY SURVEY CONTROL POINT I2063. 5/8' REBAR AND RPC 28.2' VERTICAL DATUM EAST OF CENTERLINE 757H. AVE. W. AT NAM-88 DRIVEWAY TO RES. 116315 AND 116311. E UIPMENT AND PROCEDURE Zone 1S—d-O CornerNLFlag/ia Setbacks Re wired Actual n Sides l d y ��.��SIT�E ADDRESS: 3!J / 1�JD 75TH. PL. W. l - EDM0ND5, WASHINGTON Rear a.S Other uPARCEL NO. . S / k- 6% G '1 C 00 1306000900 162TH ST W FND 4- SO. CONC. MON W/ , 1-1/2' BRASS DISK. DOWN 0.5' IN CASE - 7/15/04 ' \ ' RETAINING WALL 4'aF 1 SS I i ) J DEQ 1 z2D.os C' 4'CLF If 3W' r y I I I l• W"AHOUSE r I♦ 1 ' STARS! N3B 4$4'W 20 / FNDREBM 7115M AL � t EAISIING HOUSE' NOR IN LALL L OF LOT 10 v SOUTH PROPERTY UNE PER ROS BY GROUP ^%n FOUR INC. AF#8512135008 S69TMUNDEOUEj LOT 10 CA#22959ENTITLEDRDESSVS U. If 89-111 -A Sy / � m N 8T1S43' W 237.87' FND 1 2' REBAR &CAP �S 9435 97-067-A / — - - _ - - - -- - - - - - FAD RFBAR WIN / 587'35 s3E 2T3.40' SM CAP VNOT FOUND 164TH ST W FND 4' S0. CONC. IRON W/ Stii1F Rani-45 I2'_ -_ - 1-1/2' BRASS DISK AND LE NG.-,St.4T; PUNCH. DOWN 0.14' IN CASE-/ 7/15/04 GRAPHIC SCALE m ,o m w pp ( IN PEST ) NOTES: I inch - 20 1E 1.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATION; OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS -SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY, 3.) THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS SHOWN SERVING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORDS. WE CANNOT CERTIFY TO THEIR ACCURACY AND/OR COMPLETENESS. BEFORE- COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING EXCAVATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, CALL A LOCATING SERVICE OR 1-800-424-5555 FOR VERIFICATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. METHOD OF SURVEY SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE INSTRUMENTATION . LEICA T6RM-1105 ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION PRECISION MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 322-130-090 BASIS OF BEARING THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF 757H PLACE W, AS THE BEARING OF N1659'17 E PER THE ROS AFj83IO205001 Wtw_c^,r -S•Mr rn., ORTH PROPERTY UNE LOT 9 PER ROS BY ��,� ,�i., -N --- GROUP FOUR INC. AF/8310205001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 9 IN BLOCK 60 OF MEADOW DALE BEACH ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED /N VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGE 38, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHfNGTON. TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREET AWOING SAID PROPERTY ON THE WEST,' ALSO TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 20 IN BLOCK A OF MEADOWOALE 771X LANDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE 28, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED SPECIAL EXCEPTION.- FND R/C = 90MWS N COUNTY BENCNAIARX /I063 O CiN7ERLIJE 75' D/W 70 y HOUSE F531; W h ti -FND MAC MALL WIN FLASHER C-4 PPROV D BY PLANNING �y SEP - 2 2004 PERA4IT CpUNr R r LEGEND SECTION CORNER NOT FND O FOUND MONUMENT/CASE FOUND REBAR/CAP AS N07ED . CENTERLINE aF i CHAIN LINK FENCE O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) j LD I HOSE BIB ' f ® WATER METER f CONIFEROUS TREE cx000000 ROCK WALL ROCKERY I� CONCRETE GRAVEL i SS SANITARY SEWER PROPERTY UNE — - — - — ROW CENTER UNE X X E FENCE LINE ,v.ivw_vv ��wv �m_v EDGE OF PAVEMENT ± INDEX CONTOURS CONTOURS 1 s ern (425) TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR: �Qr_s,_ ; 356-2700 C. PAUL DENT SW 114, SW1/4, SEC.5, T.27N., R.4E., W LAND USE CONSULTANTS EDMONDS, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHING' DWN. BY DATE REV. BY DATE PROJECT MANAGER S A_ CIVIL ENGINEERS a LAND SURVEYORS WF� 08-25-04 1 C. 09-01-04 R.O.CAVNESS 1' DRAWING FILENAME CHK. BY F.B. NO. JOB NO. SHi. -:- 13000 HWY 99 SOUTH - EVERETT;.- WA - 98204 --- ,,,,,,,,,,,,„• ___ ..- . o. N 1� o OE gm M. H, cz III 311A. 133F11S 421 NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CONSTRUCTED 1957 PER ASSESSOR'S RECORDS NO EX/S77NG IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ADDED AFTER 1977 2. SPECIAL INSPEC77ONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EROSION CONTROL THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. J. SPECIAL INSPECTION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK CONDUCTED WITHIN BNSF ROW IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIPELINE LICENSE DATED JAN. 23, 2013 AND CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS. 4. PROVIDE PIPE ANCHORS AS SHOWN FOR ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPES PER GE07ECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDARONS. 5. IF THE RIM TO INVERT EXCEEDS 5' A TYPE 11 CATCH BASIN SHALL BE REQUIRED ON 7HE STORM LINE. RELD AD4PUST LOCA77ON & DAYLIGHT STORM DRAINAGE n'd x v f PIPE AT TOP OF BNSF RETAINING WALL, !E i:?6000 a PROVIDE OUTFALL/1NERGY DISSIPATER AT 60,?OM OF i WALL PER DETAIL SHEET C1.0 SSO R CA_ NE 114 SEC TION 24, U77LITY CROSSING IE 4" SD — &40.45 CROW 8" SS — 3890 MAINTAIN MIN. 0,5' VERTICAL CLEARANCE TOWNSHIP 27 No RANGE 4 E, W. M. FND 4" SQ. CONIC. M ON W/ 1-1/2" BRASS DISK. DOWN 0.5' IN CASE 7/15/04 FND R f C = SNOHOMI SH COUNTY BENCHMARK #2063 @ CENTERLINE 75' D W TO HOUSE #16315. SSMH RIM= 78.15 . I.E SO. =7i.75 �. / f- -^+ _ i ► �/ i i i �ll�: ,�t r v/N I.A, ' SHED I -- _ , ' FND 1 2'1 REBAR &CAP , �� - �.- --,- �,- ; �---- ,,- �__� _; _ 200.00' L.S. 9435 INsrr►u yI� 6 w (REM VED� '�� '- STABJA /fs4.oD (¢IATt I FG)�, E.YISTJNG HUtIS c lEfs., SETBACK 7115104 ORIGINAL � - NORTH LINE is / i*37(Y4*(�k Oa00x MIN, E *41.74 /�� Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to 9 / CONN. ROOF & FOOTING DRA/N C811; F0077NG �� utilities or frontage improvements in City I / DRAINAGE SYSTEM & ROOF DOWSPOUT SY57EM SHALL / right-of-way per City standards that is caused � / NOT BE IN7ERCONNEC7F0 UNLESS SUCH CONNEC77w /S /. or occurs during the permitted project. / MADE AT LEAST ONE FOOT BELOW THE FOOTING DRAINAGE/ / SYSTEM AND DOWNSLOPE OF THE BUILDING FOUNDA77ON. / T SOUTH PROPERTY LINE PER ROS BY GROUP FOUR INC. AF#8512135008 / (AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOT 10 CAUSE #26959 ENTITLED BUDDIES DVS BELL.) 8 9 111 A FND 1121 REBAR &'CAP L.S, # 9435 ----- FND 112" REBAR WI TH !I _______________________________________ _____-_ ___ 7'35'43" W 237.87' SMASHED CAP ----- -------------------- z� ____ �__ i ' /� '—.._.--_..__._...--_.._.__...--------_...__. ---. _-----..,._—._.,._._..._.. — : r1 N SSM H RIM-- 4 C ELEV/ 0.00 FOR ---------------------------- NO T FauND � ROOF HT. CALCUL ICAS) I.E NO.=38.98' i 97-067 A FND 4" SCE. CONC, MON W I.E. E.=39.31 1-1/2 BRASS DISK AND I.E. SO.=39.26' T 4 TH PUNCH. DOWN 0.14' IN CASE . W - - - -- -- - — S87°35'4,�"E 7/15/04 _ 213, 40' IMPERWOUS AREA BREAKDO LINE TYPE AREA SQUARE FEET 1 NON -REGULATED DW 2,247 + HOUSE PA770 1,513 = 3,760 EXEMPT REGULATED 2 REPLACED 0 0 3 NEW POST 1977;_1 > > > > > > > > > -1 GARAGE ADDITION 1,982 4 TOTAL REGULATED IMPERVIOUS AREA MI77GA77ON REQUIRED IF IN EXCESS OF 2000 SF = 1982 5 TOTAL AREA M177GATED BY EXIS77NG STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(S) - NIA 6 REGULATED NOT YET U177GATED = NIA 7 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES = NIA AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED THROUGH CONVEN77ONAL SWM TECHNIQUES _ - N/A iQOCUMENTARM OE MM&M ffQUffaHM7S CQUaIA&M THIS PROJECT WILL ADD LESS THAN 2,000 S..F. OF REGULATED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND IS THEREFORE CLASSIFIED AS A SMALL SITE - CATEGORY 1 PROJECT. M.R. #1 - PREPARATION OF STORMWATER SI7E PLAN: A STORMWATER SI7E PLAN IS PROVIDED AS SHEET C2,0 OF 2. - ( M.R. #2 - CONSTRUCT70N STORMWATER POLLU77ON PREVEN77ON PLAN (CSWPPP): A CSWPPP 1S PROVIDED AS SHEET C1.0 OF 2. M.R. #3 - SOURCE CONTROL OF POLLU770N. SPECIFIC SOURCE CONTROLS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDEN77AL SITES. M.R. #4 - PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND OUTFALLS. NO SIGNIFICANT RUN-ON ENTERS THE SI7E FROM THE UPSTREAM PROPER77ES (LE, 75TH PL NE R.O.W.) RUNOFF FROM EFFEC77VE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES W/LL BE COLLECTED IN A SERIES OF PIPES AND CATCH BASINS AND DISCHARGED AT THE BASE OF 7HE BNSF RR 77E RETAINING WALL U77LIZING AN ENERGY DISSIPATER (I.E., OPEN 7EE-SEC77ON OF PIPE DISCHARGING TO EXIS77NG GRAVEL DRAINAGE DITCH ADJACENT TO RR TRACKS). M.R. #5 - ONSI7F STORMWATER MANAGEMENT- THE SITE DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO LID TECHNOLOGIES DUE TO LOCA77ON WITHIN AN ESLHA SENS177VE AREA. M.R. #6 RUNOFF TREATMENT NOT APPLICABLE FOR SMALL S17E - CATEGORY 1 PROJECTS M.R. #7 - FLOW CONTROL: THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A DIRECT DISCHARGE BASIN AND WILL DISCHARGE DIREC77-Y TO THE PUGET SOUND. M.R. #8 - WETLAND PROTEC770N. NOT APPLICABLE FOR 7HIS PROJECT AS THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ON OR ADJACENT TO THE SITE M.R. #9 - OPERA77ON AND MAINTENANCE. • NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS PROJECT AS THERE ARE NO INFILTRA77ON OR DE7EN77ON BMP'S PROPOSED. M.R. #10 - OFFSI7E ANALYSIS AND MI77GA770N. NOT APPLICABLE FOR SMALL SI7E - CATEGORY 1 PROJECTS M.R. #11 - FINANCIAL LMB/L/TY.• THE APPLICANT/OWNER W/LL PROVIDE ALL FINANCIAL GUARAN77ES REQUIRED BY FHE CITY OF EDMONDS. FND MA NAIL WI TH FLASHER G— 4 APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DA 7E.• f BY TAZ %//3 R: \2012\0\12022\3\Drawings\Plots\Building Perm it\02- 3SD_1 2022.dwg 8/9/2013 7: 33: 33 AM PDT COPYRIGHT QQ 2013, D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. f x 2 r D.R. STRONG CONSUL TING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 10604 NE 38th PL, #101 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 $' 0 425.827.3063 F 425.827.2423 www.drstrong.com . z w O a>> Q 3 3 0 N O o O &'t?' - .R. E FILE AUGoy2013' gUCI?Y OF EDi1O D N� DRAFTED BY CWA DESIGNED BY. WJS PROJECT ENGINEER: WJS DATE.• 01-03-13 PROJECT NO.: 12022 SHEET C2.0 OF 2 ( /f NE 114 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 27 N, RANGE 4 E, Vi/. M. { SSMH RIM= 78.15 \8 I.E SD.=71.75 NORTH PROPERTY LINE LOT 9 P --R ROS BY I. E. NO.=71.59 SSMN RIM=40.02 f.E NO.=37.82 GROUP FOUR INC. AF 8310205@01 I . E: S. E. = 38.15 OU7UNE OF EXIsnNG HOUSE MINDA71ON / 1. E. S0,=38.04 BRICK OU7UNE OF EMS G A,�� RETAINING WALL I (� SAVE UNE .J' 1 / / 1 J y ! `f C,°L� \t �\ '\� ,` ° d: °.d •. ° SS SS SS SS SS SS -�- SS 1.-� >/ SS / -SS Ss SS UTILIZE EXISTING PAV"E,, � 7�ss�'_-_ TAB/UZEIi CONSTRUCn�`F.�S SC / > l 43 Y Y . f `.JJJ ,�J f i' ' ` --- ''� �� N 8 7 35 3,� W ------------ i t I t 1 1 ! i , rn ° tr I ° / ',''r=/ : ' '' " -- -^ s '--_ _ . •. a ;�� 2 Ll '. ♦ J Ca ` NOTE,, 1 , , 1 , 1 t � /� •' LOCAWON OF BNSF R 77E RETAINING WALL - AND 1,40D/710NAL CONTOURS ADJACENT TO , 1 1 1 LC'I ®'®` T �. r �: �' 1 �~ •` i WALL +DIG/TILED ' � fROM� SNOSCAPE i ! (SNO90M/SH COUNTYJ LANDSCAPE, IMAGING)—J �' ' d I i ' 1 :' ''+ 't: t •� j t CJ� 1 .1 �: I G ' i .. f t t•. :• + SC .,r'l t VE 1• I YY l�l A Y ; 1 J i I' °O J ` �li , i .}•. �,--//�X/ 7 1 f �X/ �,ry. i 1 A• ��•j/ ° t/ t 1 /j/ t + ' 1 STAIR E / 1 . f � / \ 28.J j I �� • 1 1 �'+9 . I . I HOUSE r�SL. I I + ! 1 1 t al - 'O , f Z .: •. ,j • ..• . 1 _ 1 1 _ %�, _ t+�j 'T / /''�1,a 1�-•� �} I 1 / t , , , 1 'd ` , ':. i / I •`.,.,�` n l FA 1 f l�' �`t?;; wed C.4 3m► I #163JO / I I � / i � i � ' ° ' .. f , .' 0)PS Q� O 1 �t•, J •� / j' �'.✓ 1 1 % <^•d_ + � (I I Jj �" d � ''.t ,• • .. ,;> � .. i .•r •• / 1� r• � v CO ' V EX. CANT, 1 r t v Q) r I 1 IV- i ��. � 1 f CA T V A LK J ' d J 1 � S If i;"i i a _''; R EASE;1,1E T 11� /-a/y/ /�// j/ ' i i i 1 / _ : i t , •� , It `�f 4f./.G�/'.l�i��G�s�.!_I .L �trL' .C.�J - _ t •1- •1' r. S / If f i�'7 L - - - - - - - - - - - -� J 1 t � - . _ r .• .. i; 1 1 I :�FN, PLO. / � `-F•- � r _ _ . ,.. '..f Y .w,�; ,..,_,_.,>,: W/ 24 5 ssW/ , . CA �' PS 27.74 , + ! , t 't 1 1 i t ,.•�� j...V — �aR•�a J 1s —1«... ' PLASTIC �". \' ,� 'f' fJ /''�J 'f M\ / 1 J ,,` rY, ....: .--.-.. _ � _ / FIND 1 2'I REBAR CCAP' SHED J \ �, OU7UNE OF PROPOSED, — — - — — - I L.S. 943� J �REM�VED / OUTLINE o�.oPAosED , I ' UnUZEIE�'ISnNG PAVETS PARKING FOR l; f 200.00 f ' r ' + t ; CONS71 UC7 STAGING AND PARKING ' I 7115104 ORIGINAL EXISTING H0USP' EAVE UNE p/.� p/��r A�//�/ /x{. , SETBACK.l . _ I Q NE[ 1AL /.•t4�/ 1 �Sw 1. SITE. PLAN AND BASE MAP PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT ON MARCH 23, 2012 INCLUDING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A WESTERN SURVEYORS, INC. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMA77ON ADDED MAY 20, 2013 (200' SHORELINE SETBACK). 2. ALL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CONSTRUCTED CA. 1957 PER ASSESSORS RECORDS. NO EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACES 61,m/n ADDED AFTER 197Z 3 SPECIAL INSPEC77ONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EROSION CONTROL THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 2mIn. 4. SPECIAL INSPEC77ON WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK CONDUCTED WITHIN BNSF ROW IN ACCORDANCE W17H PIPELINE LICENSE DATED JAN. 23, 2013 AND CITY OF EDMONDS REQUIREMENTS " '1 5. PROVIDE PIPE ANCHORS AS SHOWN FOR STORM DRAIN PIPES WITH GREATER THAN 209' SLOPE. S„ 6. IF THE RIM TO INVERT EXCEEDS 5 A TYPE ll CATCH BASIN SHALL BE REQUIRED ON THE STORM LINE. concrete block CONS_TR_tICTION SEQUENCE NOTES: A 1. SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCT70N MEETING .WITH CITY ENGINEERING DII/ISION AT 425-771-0220, EXT. 1326. A-S N•E IPED 2. REVIEW ESC NOTES. J. CALL FOR U77LITY LOCATES. concrete block 4. INSTALL ESC MEASURES AND MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL. Aill a96e)AL 1N%pGC-tov_ 5. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY ENGINEERING INSPEC 10R. (ALL TEMPORARY anchor / - SEDIMENTA77ON AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR SITE CLEARING. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES AND/OR DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT e / L---»ipe bedding VEGETATION lS ESTABLISHED.) 6. INSTALL UTIL177ES AND OTHER SITED IMPROVEMENTS. Z STABILIZE AND REVEGETATE EN77RE SITE. (ALL +0►S'f'urrS= Sottss 'r0 >St~ L,oMposr /�M/ • E � 8. ESTABLISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. EROSION CONTROL FEATURES CAN BE REMOVED UPON FINAL SITE STABILIZA7ON AND APPROVAL BY CITY INSPECTOR. 1) TEMP EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR S17E CLEARING. DELINEATE OR MARK THE FOLLOWING AREAS AND FEATURES ON S17F PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. - (A) CLEARING LIMITS (8) 07HER AREAS ON THE SITE REQUIRED TO BE PROTECTED INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMI7ED TO, DRAINAGE COURSES 2) U77LIZE EXIS77NG PAVED DRIVEWAY FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND PARKING AREA STABILIZA7ON 3) ESTABLISH AREAS FOR STORAGE AND HANDLING OF POLLUTED MATERIALS AT WHICH POLLU77ON SOURCE CONTROL BMP s WILL BE IMPLEMENTED 4) INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLS 5) IMPLEMENT STABILIZATION MEASURES FOR DISTURBED AREAS, SLOPES, AND. MATERIAL STOCKPILES 6) MAINTAIN BMP s UNTIL FINAL SITE STABIUZA77ON AND PERMANENT VEGETA7ON IS ESTABLISHED REFERENCE THE 2005 DOE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON FOR BMP'S Note: For SWPE pipe must be free to strap -footing anchor MW 1" min. diameter steel rod (strap) O clamped securely to pipe. 6" min vr. s ..a..,:......:. 07 La i'v'�•.a ti..a concrete footing 1ot.:9:r;-.: la`: 1' min .a..r:t.o ..a..::.o'.y.l::.. keyed into :dw:• :• �•::� :vt. > undisturbed soil �' x pipe da. � as shown min. SECTION B-B NTS 1) FRESERVE VEGETATIONV,/MARK CLEARING LIMITS: VEGETA7ON SHALL BE PRESERVED (BMP C101) BY RE57RICTING CONS7RUCTION slide inside a 4' long section of pipe ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN. CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE MARKED WITH A HIGH WS/B/LITY PLASTIC FENCE one size diameter larger. (BMP C103). 2) ESTABLISH ONSTAGING,NUC77O AND ACCESS. PARXIG. S77NG PAVED DRIVEWAY SHALL BE U77LIZED FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE,CONSTPIPE ANCHOR DETAIL . 3) CONTROL FLOW RATES: FLOW RATES SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY A SILT FENCE (BMP C223) AT THE DOWNSLOPE EDGE OF THE 2009 KCSWDM FIGURE 4.2.1.8 NTS CLEARING LIMITS AND A VEGETATED STRIP (BMP C234) BETWEEN THE FILTER FENCE AND THE. WEST PROPERTY LINE. 4) INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLS: SEDIMENT SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY A SILT FENCE (BMP C223) AT THE DOWNSLOPE EDGE OF THE CLEARING LIMITS AND A VEGETATED STRIP (BMP C234) BETWEEN THE FILTER FENCE AND THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. 5) STABILIZE SOILS, • UNWORKED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH MULCHING (BMP C121) AND/ OR DUST CONTROL (BMP C140) MEASURES. EXCAVATED MATERIAL WILL BE LOADED DIRECTLY INTO A DUMP TRUCK STAGED ON S17F AND THEREFORE, NO SOIL STOCKPILES ARE PROPOSED ON 7H/S SITE. FINAL SITE STABILIZATION WILL BE ACHIEVED 7HROUGH COMPOST -AMENDING (BMP T5.13). 6) PROTECT SLOPES• THERE ARE NO CUT/FILL SLOPES AFFECTED BY THIS PROJECT. 7) PROTECT PERMANENT DRAIN INLETS, • DRAIN INLETS IN 75TH PL NE WILL BE PROTECTED Wl774 A CATCH BASIN FILTER INSERT. 8) STABILIZE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. 77-IE STORM DRAINAGE OUTFACE WILL BE PROTECTED WITH AN ENERGY DISSIPATER PER THE DETAIL SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. 9) CONTROL POLLUTANTS.• CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT CONCRETE HANDLING (BMP C151) AND MATERIAL STORAGE, DELIVERY, AND CONTAINMENT (BMP C153) MEASURES AS WELL AS OTHER APPROPRIATE POLLUTION SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES IN AREAS OF.• CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR FUELING, HANDLING OR STORAGE OF WASTE MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, FERTILIZERS, AND CHEMICALS; AND OTHER AC771477ES THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE POLLUTANTS TO STORMWATER. THE FOLLOWING . SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS APPLY - A) COVER, CONTAINMENT, AND PR07EC77ON FROM VANDALISM SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL CHEMICALS, LIQUID PRODUCTS, PE7ROLEUM PRODUCTS, AND OTHER MATERIALS THAT HAVE P07EN77AL TO POSE A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH OR THE . ENVIRONMENT. B) ON -SITE FUELING TANKS SHALL INCLUDE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. C) MAINTENANCE, FUELING AND REPAIR OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES SHALL BE CONDUCTED USING SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL MEASURES CONSISTENT WI774 VOLUME IV, CHAPTERS 2 AND J. D) CONTAMINATED SURFACES. SHALL BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ANY SPILL INCIDENT. E) APPLICATION OF FER77LIZERS AND PES77CIDES SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER AND AT APPLICATION RATES THAT WILL NOT RESULT IN LOSS OF CHEMICAL TO STORMWATER RUNOFF. MANUFACTURERS' LABEL REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICA7ON RATES AND PROCEDURES SHALL BE FOLLOWED. F) BMP s SHALL BE USED TO PREVENT CONTAMINA77ON OF STORMWATER RUNOFF BY pH MODIFYING SOURCES. THESE SOURCES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMI7ED TO, BULK .CEMENT, CEMENT KILN DUST, FLY ASH, NEW CONCRETE WASHING APPROVED TREATMENT, CURING WATERS, WASTE STREAMS GENERATED FROM CONCRETE GRINDING AND SAWING, EXPOSED AGGREGATE PROCESSES, DEWATERING CONCRETE VAULTS, CONCRETE PUMPING AND MIXER WASHOUT/ WATER, G) CONCRETE TRUCK CHUTES, PUMPS, AND IN7E•RNALS SHALL BE WASHED OUT ONLY INTO FORMED AREAS AWA177NG INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE. UNUSED CONCRETE REMAINING IN THE TRUCK AND PUMP SHALL BE RETURNED TO 77-IE ORIGINATING BATCH PLANT FOR RECYCLING. WASHDOWN FROM CONCRETE HAND TOOLS AND WORK AREAS SHALL NOT DRAIN DIRECTLY TO NATURAL OR CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. WHEN NO FORMED AREAS ARE AVAILABLE, WASHWATER AND LEFTOVER PRODUCT SHALL BE CONTAINED IN A LINED CONTAINER AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT VIOLATE GROUNDWATER OR SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. H) WHERE FEASIBLE, AND NOT IN CONFLICT WITH INTERNA77ONAL FIRE CODE, STORE P07ENTIAL STORMWATER POLLUTANT MATERIALS INSIDE A BUILDING OR UNDER A COVER AND/OR CONTAINMENT. LIQUID AND APPLICABLE SOLID MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN CONTAINERS SUITABLE FOR THE CONTENTS AND INSPECTED FOR CORROSION, STRUCTURAL FAILURE, 77GHT FIT77NG LIDS, LEAKS AND OVERFILLS. STORE MATERIALS IN AREAS SLOPING AWAY FROM STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS OR SURFACE WATERS SWEEP AND CLEAN THE JOB S17E REGULARLY TO PREVENT BUILDUP OF CONTAMINA77NG MATERIALS. PROMPTLY CLEAN UP SOLID AND LIQUID POLLUTANT LEAKS AND SPILLS AND DISPOSE OF IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT SANITARY CODE J. 1 AND ALL 07HER FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL REGULA770PIS IN ORDER TO PREVENT STORMWAIFR POLLUTION. 10) CONTROL DEWATERING., ]HERE ARE NO DEWATERING OPERA77ONS PLANNED FOR 774IS PROJECT. 11) MAINTAIN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. BMP s SHALL. BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMOVED W17HIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE CITY DETERMINES THAT THE SITE IS STABILIZED, PROVIDED THAT TEMPORARY BMP's MAY BE REMOVED WHEN 77-IEY ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. 12) MANAGE THE PROJECT THIS PLAN SHALL BE FULLY IMPLEMENTED AT ALL 77MES AND MODIFIED WHENEVER 774ERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUC770N, OPERATION, OR MAINTENANCE AT THE CONSTRUCTION S17E THAT HAS OR COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO WATERS OF THE STATE. SITE VOLUME CALCULATIONS CUT VOLUME FILL VOLUME TOTAL VOLUME (CU. YDS.) (CU. YDS.) (CU. YDS.) 335 156 491 ALL VOLUMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND REPRESENT FINISH GRADE TO EXISTING GRADE AS SHOWN. THE VOLUMES DO NOT INCLUDE STRIPPING, EXPANSION FACTOR OR ANY SOIL TYPE RESTRICTIONS. f 1 7 t 1 1 � ' 0r N 8°24'54"W / (� _ /20.66 tIn V 1 LEGEND CLEARING LIM173 MARKED 107H HIGH VISIBILITY CONS7RUC7701N X X FENCE (BMP C103) W7H 1' SEPARA7701V SILT FENCE (BMP C233) CA COMPOST —AMENDING (BMP M 13) PS PERMANENT SEED/NC AND PLAN77NG (BMP C120) DC DUST CONTROL (BMII C140) SC SAKU777NG AND St'•,RFACING POICL.U71 N PREVEN770N (BMP C152) CONCRETE HANDLING (BMP C151) SC STABILIZED CONS7RVC770N ENTRANCE (BMP C105) . lP STi7RM DRAIN INLET PRO7EC77ON (BMP C220) STREET SKEP/NG AaVD VACUUMING 1 - 4" SCH 40 PVC TEE OPEN AT TOP TO PROVIDE CLEAN -OUT 3/4" STAINLESS STEEL STRAP W/ 2 - SS WOOD SCREWS AS NEEDED TO SECURE PIPE TO RETAINING WALL J ENERGY DISSIPATER: 1 - 4" X 45' SCH 40 PVC VER77CAL BEND 1 - 4"01 SCH 40 PVC TEE W/ OPEN ENDS TO DISPERSE PIPE DISCHARGE, FIELD ADJUST HEIGHT ABOVE DITCH DAYLIGHT 4" DRAINAGE PIPE AT TOP OF RETAINING WALL -FIELD LOCATE 4"01 SCH 40 PVC DRAINAGE PIPE FROM CB#1 SEE PLAN VIEW SHEET C2.0 EX. R.R. 77E RETAINING WALL NOTE.• PAINT EXPOSED PIPE SEC710N PRIOR TO INSTALLA770M TO PROVIDE U. V PRO7FC77ON �- EX. B. N. S.F. ]RACKS EX. DRAINAGE DITCH STORM DRAINAGE OWFALLIENERGY DISSIPATER DETAIL NTS Call 2 Working Days Before You Dig 1-800-424-5555 Utilities Underground Location Center (ID,MT,ND,OR,WA) APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDMONDS DATE• BY R: \2012\0\12022\3\Drawings\Plots\Building Permit\01-3ER-12022 .dwg 8/9/2013 8: 40:51 AM PDT COPYRIGHT © 2013, D.R. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. D D� D.R. STRONG CONSUL TING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS 10604 NE 38th PL, #101 KIRKLAND, WA 98033 0425.827.3063 F 425.827.2423 www.drstrong.com W LU W Q Z,L1rZ' W ~ _-�j W g� LijImo• '1i I Ill, w Q R U w O � � U ei% -, `T I LE `41 OT PQ E r. SUB A00092013 BUCK of EPDMON S T DRAFTED BY CWA DESIGNED BY WJS PROJECT ENGINEER: WJS DATE.• 01-0.3-13 PROJECT NO.: - 12022 SHEET C 1. 0 OF 2 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) NOTES: 1 inch = 20 ft. 1.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND SURVEYOR. 2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATION; OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, AND OCCUPATION WHICH MAY ENCUMBER TITLE TO OR USE OF THIS PROPERTY. 3.) THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS SHOWN SERVING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORDS. WE CANNOT CERTIFY TO THEIR ACCURACY AND/OR COMPLETENESS. BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION INVOLVING EXCAVATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, CALL A LOCATING SERVICE OR 1-800-424-5555 FOR VERIFICATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. r FIND 1/2' REBAR &CAP L.S.e 9435 I 7115104 co FND 112' REBAR & CAP L.S. 19435 NOT FOUND SSMH RIM=46.18' LE NO.=38.98' I.E. E.=39.31' I.E. SO.=39.26' SSMH RIM=46.02' I.E NO.=37.82' I.E. S.E.=38.15' I.E. SO.=38.04 SS -rCONCRETEn. PA110 \ 1i HOUSE \ I - J16330 I \ I b\( /10 PLAST SHEDI ORIGINAL NORTH LINE OF LOT 10 jk-B.M& SIVOHOMISH COUNTY SURVEY CONTROL PCINT. #2063. 5/8" REBAR AND RPC 28.2' VERTICAL DATUM EAST OF CENTERLINE 75TH. AVE. W. AT NAVD-88 DF'NEWAY TO RES. J16315 AND #16311. EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURE METHOD OF SURVEY SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE INSTRUMENTA ON LEICA TCRM-110.5 ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION PRECISION MEETS, OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 322-130-090 BASIS OF BEARING THE MONUMENTEt9 CENTERLINE OF 75TH PLACE W AS THE BEARING OF N16 59'17"E PER THE ROS AFJ8310205001 NORTH PROPERTY LINE LOT 9 PER ROS BY GROUP FOUR INC. AF#8310205001 SSMH RIM=78.15 LE SO.=71.75 I.E. NO.=71.59 RETAINING WALL 1 S 220.06' ' /4 , x, I / r ( J GRAVEL I I WOOD WALKWAY ( I` STAIRS! I cu v ♦o co ti in to to rn �n �o I Vic, ��.. 1 I I I ! I Ij . o % N88 24'54"W , J ' EXISTING HOUSE —SOUTH PROPERTY LINE PER ROS BY GROUP FOUR INC. AF#8512135008 (AND SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE #26959 ENTITLED RUDDIES VS BELL.) N 87'35'43" W 237.87' 97-067—A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 9 IN BLOCK 60 OF MEADOW DALE BEACH ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS AT PAGE 38, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREET ADJOING SAID PROPERTY ON THE WEST, ALSO TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTH 50 FEET OF LOT 20 /N BLOCK A OF MEADOWDALE TIDE LANDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS AT PAGE 28, IN SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION NOT DISCLOSED HEREON. LOT 10 89-111—A _ S87'35'43"E — 213.40' 164TH ST W 1 162TH ST W FND 4" SQ. CONC. MON W/ 1-1/2" BRASS DISK. DOWN 0.5' IN CASE 7/15/04 ♦ '` •J N873543"W l 20.58' r h 01) SITE ADDRESS: 16330 75TH. PL. W. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PARCEL NO. 0051306000900 LEGEND SECTION CORNER NOT FND ® FOUND MONUMENT/CASE FOUND REBAR/CAP AS N07ED \; - - „♦` ♦��.> - --- -- + - - --- - _ cam._ C047ERl:!NE._ FND R/C = SNOHOMISH cLF CHAIN LINK FENCE > COUNTY BENCHMARK�2063 ® CENTERLINE 75' D W TO / HOUSE f16315. 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE (SSMH) N88 24'54"W 20.66' 'o +( 2 � i� :0 o ham' �o FND 1/2" REBAR WITH / SMASHED CAP FND 4" SQ. CONC. MON W/ 1-1/2" BRASS DISK AND r PUNCH. DOWN 0.14' IN CASE—/ 7/15/04 HOSE BIB N ® WATER METER 0 DECIDIOUS TREE FND MAG NAIL WITH cxDcxDcxDc=> ROCK WALL FLASHER G-4 ROCKERY CONCRETE GRAVEL SS SANITARY SEWER PROPERTY LINE — - - — ROW CENTER LINE FENCE LINE EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - - - - - - - INDEX CONTOURS ------------------ CONTOURS RECEIVE JAN 112013 DEVELO MENTER R` COU