The URL can be used to link to this page

16508 76TH AVE W.PDF16508 76TH AVE W v c IV E 0., 5 r-NUINEERING 16508 76tfi c4uF-nuF- wumET finonli, "Wc4 98026 -? -? G - Sc cl c 61,W% CY Cam_` Gc.3-✓c�r_ • c� . yLt-,,. 0` L. (. � cL1^'cXc. &ASSOCIATE S,INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION June 15, 2012 Steele Home Services, Inc. 23631 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington 98026 Attention: Mr. Dwight Steele RE: Limited Geotechnical Reconnaissance Chilelli Deck Replacement 16508 — 76`h Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Steele: KA Project No. 092-12007 ST&Z. REEp FILE RESUS JUN 2 5 2012 BUILDING DEPARnMENT CITY OF EDMONDS This letter presents the results of our site reconnaissance and geotechnical conclusions and recommendations for the proposed deck replacement project. The scope of this limited geotechnical reconnaissance was outlined in our Proposal Number G12-287WAB, dated May 21, 2012. Introduction It is our understanding that current project plans include a the replacement of an existing deck at the single family residence located at 16508 — 76"' Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington as shown_ in the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. The City of Edmonds requires a geotechnical study for the proposed deck project. We have been requested to provide geotechnical engineering services regarding the planned site improvements. The scope of this limited evaluation includes a limited background review of available historical records and published geologic information for the site, a limited surficial reconnaissance of the site slopes, and exploration of near -surface soil conditions with a shallow hand tool excavation in the area of the planned deck foundations. For our use in preparing this proposal we have been provided with plan sheet Al by tecinsfruct LLC, dated May 9, 2012. We have also been provided with a letter from the City of Edmonds, dated May 10, 2012, regarding critical areas and the need for a geotechnical report for this project. According to the City of Edmonds letter, applicable Edmonds code for this project are ECDC 23.80.040.A.3 (Allowed Activities — Geologically Hazardous Areas — Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas) and ECDC 23.80.070.A.2 (Development Standards — Specific Hazards.— Alterations). The letter also indicates that the project site is located within the mapped North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA). The site is located near the southern portion of an area known as the Meadowdale Landslide and is within the North Edmonds ESLHA as defined by Landau Associates in their report to the City of Edmonds in 2007. In particular, the site is situated just beyond the top of the southern scarp of the landslide. The Landau Ten Offices Serving The Western United States 11715 N Creek Parkway S., C-106; Bothell, WA 98011 • (425) 485-5519; Fax (425)485-6837 KA No. 092-12007 June 15, 2012 Page No. 2 of 6 Associates report defines this area along the top of the landslide as Zone D and provides recommendations for geotechnical report requirements. Zone D. This zone encompasses the active scarp of the landslide and incorporates ground that is outside the currently active landslide area. The west part of this zone includes parts of the slope that are actively failing as shallow debris slides. This zone also includes areas that can potentially fail as large block failures. . The eastern part of this zone includes currently stable ground that has not yet failed behind the present top of the landslide scarp. This area could be subject to failure from a large block -type landslide failure or a series of shallower debris slides occurring on the face of the bluff and the resultant bluff retreat over a period of years. Any development near a designated landslide hazard zone will require consideration of the landslide hazard, potential bluff retreat, and buffers (designated as a distance of 50 ft or the height of the steep slope back from the top of the slope, whichever is greater, per the requirements of ECDC 23.80).(Landau Associates, 2007) It is our understanding that due to the light structure being replaced, and the fact that there is no proposed change to the footprint of the existing deck, the City is willing to accept a geotechnical report with less stringent requirements for subsurface exploration, slope stability analysis, and geotechnical recommendations than those recommended for Zone D in the Landau Associates 2007 report. General Site Description The project site is situated near the Puget Sound shoreline, north of downtown Edmonds in a residential neighborhood. The site includes sloping ground, generally sloping down to the north and west. The site currently includes a single family residence and existing deck. A lawn and other landscaping features are located throughout much of the property. Geologic Setting: The site lies within the central Puget Lowland. North of Olympia, Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances and retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland includes deposits of glacial and non -glacial sediments. The "Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington," prepared by James P. Minard (U.S.G.S., 1983) indicates that the site area is underlain by Glacial Till (Qvt). In general, Glacial Till. consists of a very compact, unsorted mixture of silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and some boulders. Other materials mapped near the site include the Quaternary Whidbey Formation (Qw) located to the north and west of the property, and generally include compact interglacial deposits of sand and gravel. Quaternary Olympia Gravels (Qog) are located stratigraphically above the Whidbey Formation and include compact interglacial fluvial deposits of gravel and sand. The Olympia Gravels are located northeast of the property. Above the Olympia Gravels, the map indicates that Quaternary Transitional Beds (Qtb) are present. The Transitional Beds generally include compact clay, silt and fine sand layers from ancient low -energy depositional environments. These materials are generally located east and northeast of the project site. Above the Transitional Beds, the map indicates the presence of Quaternary Advance Outwash (Qva). Krazan & Associates, Inc. Ten Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-12007 June 15, 2012 Page No. 3 of 6 Advance Outwash includes compact, poorly to moderately sorted sand with some gravel. This material is shown on the map to be located east and northeast of the project site. We also reviewed a geologic map by Mackey Smith (WA DNR and U.S.G.S., 1975), titled "Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington". This map indicates that the area to the north of the project site consists of Quaternary Old Landslide deposits (Qols). We reviewed the "North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Map", created by Landau Associates, Inc. (May 2006), for additional information regarding the local geology in the site area. The map indicates the presence of a large landslide scarp north of the project site. In particular, the southern edge of the scarp is located along the northern property boundary of the site. The existing residence and attached deck are located outside of the southern edge of the landslide scarp. The northern edge of the proposed deck project is approximately 16 to 20 feet from the top of the steep slope. The site is located within the ESLHA, but outside of the active landslide area. A report by GeoEngineers, Inc. (1985) noted that the installation of sanitary sewers and storm drains by the City of Edmonds had since lowered groundwater levels in the area and reduced the landslide hazard risk. Even with a reduced slide hazard, there still exists some risk of landsliding. We did not find documentation of other significant slides in the area since the 1946-47 event, including the winter of 1996-97 when significant slides occurred throughout the Puget Sound Region. Site Reconnaissance We visited the site on May 31, 2012 for a limited geotechnical site reconnaissance. The primary intent of the site visit was to observe current surface conditions prior to preparing a letter for the planned deck replacement project. During our site reconnaissance, we did not observe indications of recent instability on the slope. The steep slope in the northern portion of the property was interpreted to be the edge of a large landslide that was active as recently as the winter of 1946-47. Most of the property is gently to moderately sloping down to the west. A Site Plan showing property boundaries, approximate residence location, and approximate elevation contours is presented as Figure 2. We explored the near -subsurface soil conditions in the planned deck footing areas near the western side of the existing structure. Approximately 2 to 3 feet of loose, undocumented fill was encountered in the hand auger explorations. Deeper fill areas are possible in the planned deck remodel area. We interpret native Glacial Till to underlie the undocumented fill. Conclusions and Recommendations General: It is our opinion, from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, that the proposed deck replacement project is feasible and should not adversely impact the overall stability of the site, provided that our recommendations are incorporated into project plans. The plans indicate that the deck will be a lightly loaded structure and recommendations for foundation support were not included in the scope of work. However, due to the loose surficial soils encountered in our Krazan & Associates, Inc. Ten Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-12007 June 15, 2012 Page No. 4 of 6 shallow hand auger explorations near the proposed deck replacement footings, we are providing a few general guidelines'for improved foundation support for the proposed deck. The proposed deck should be supported on shallow footings bearing on the medium dense or firmer native soils, or on structural fill extending to the medium dense or firmer native soils. Based on our explorations, the medium dense or firmer native soils should typically be encountered at least 2 to 3 feet below the current grade in the western portion of the deck area. It is possible that deeper areas of loose soils could be encountered at the site. A representative of Krazan and Associates should be available to evaluate soil conditions in the planned footing areas during construction, upon request. Footings should have a minimum embedment depth bf 18 inches below pad subgrade (soil grade). Footing widths should be based on the anticipated loads. Water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Footing excavations should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer to verify that the foundations will bear on suitable material. Site Stability: The site is in the ESLHA and studies indicate that there is some continued risk of landsliding. We did not observe indications of recent instability at the site or on the adjacent slopes. We observed large, mature trees and the absence of noticeable tension cracks on and near the pre-existing slide scarp along the northern property boundary. Glacial Till is interpreted to underlie the site at depth, and is typically considered to have good strength due to its very dense, granular nature. Stormwater Runoff: The area of impervious surfaces will not be increased by the deck replacement project. Stormwater is not currently allowed to concentrate from the existing deck area. The existing deck floor has gaps, and water is dispersed throughout the landscaping below the deck. Based on current project plans, it appears that stormwater runoff conditions at the site should remain unchanged. Erosion Control: We recommend that the site soils be protected from erosion due to flowing water or wind. Stormwater should not be allowed to concentrate near the top of slopes or be allowed to flow over the steep slopes. Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be implemented and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. At a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: 1) Phase the soil, foundation, utility and other work, requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the wet season (generally October through April), but it should also be known that this may increase the overall cost of the project. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Ten Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-12007 June 15, 2012 Page No. 5 of.6 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be needed to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt. fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. Conclusion: Provided that the geotechnical recommendations and construction specifications relevant to the deck remodel are implemented during construction, it is our opinion that the proposed improvements should not increase the potential for erosion and landslides within the project site, neighboring properties and other critical areas. Testing and Inspection We are available on request to evaluate soil conditions during construction of the proposed replacement deck. This activity is an integral part of our services as acceptance of earthwork construction is dependent upon observation of the consistency of the soil and groundwater conditions, and making appropriate adjustments if conditions vary from those indicated by out explorations. LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the geotechnical letter may require the geotechnical letter to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the,Owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this letter without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this letter. The recommendations made in this letter are based on the assumption that soil and groundwater conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. The conclusions of this letter are based on the information provided regarding any proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this letter may not be valid. The geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations can be reviewed and re- evaluated. This letter is a limited geotechnical reconnaissance with the purpose of observing surficial geologic conditions at the site to evaluate the impact of the deck replacement project. The scope of our services did not include any environmental site assessment for the presence or absence of hazardous and/or toxic Krazan & Associates, Inc. Ten Offces Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-12007 June 15, 2012 Page No. 6 of 6 materials in the soil, groundwater or atmosphere, or the presence of wetlands. Any statements, or absence of statements, in this letter or on any exploration log, regarding odors, unusual or - suspicious items, or conditions observed are strictly for descriptive purposes and are not intended to convey engineering judgment regarding potential hazardous and/or toxic assessments. The information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future developments. We emphasize that this letter is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not be used for any other site. We appreciate the opportunity to provide service to you on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (425) 485-5519. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6/15/12 Michael D. Rundquist, P.E. Senior Project Manager JGL:MDR Attachments: Vicinity Map and Site Plan W as hi�`gf co 7 2862 4sed Ge0'\o Jeffrey G. League Jeffrey G. League, L.G. Project Geologist Krazan & Associates, Inc. Ten Offices Serving The Western United States Vicinity Map N (Not to Scale) 4SW 148th Puget Sound 525 Approximate ; Site Area a r N Q 176th St SW N Q 99 196th St SW Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington 16508 - 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, WA OF aIarZ & ASSOCIATES,INC. Chilelli Deck Replacement Project, 16508 - 76th Ave W, Edmonds, WA Date: June 2012 References: Based on Google Maps Drawn By: JGL Figure 1 Project Number: 092-12007 Site Plan (Not to Scale) - - 70- — - Elevation Contour Interval: 5 Feet (Based on Snohomish County "SnoScape" imaging.) Reference: Site Plan based on Snohomish County "SnoScape" imaging and Google Maps. I Elevation Contour Interval: 5 Feet (Based on Snohomish County "SnoScape" imaging.) Reference: Site Plan based on Snohomish County "SnoScape" imaging and Google Maps. I CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5 h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.EdmondsWA.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION 'nC. 18y" Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report Critical Areas File Number CRA20120027 Determination Study Required Site Location _ _� _16508 76rh Ave W, Edmonds Tax Account Number 00513109700501 Property Owner Donna. Chielli Applicant Dwight Steele / Steele Home Service, Inc. Critical Areas Present 21-Geologically Hazardous Areas 2 Landslide Hazard Areas I I - Q ESLHA Site Description During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including a Geologically Hazardous Areas (Erosion'Hazard Area or Landslide Hazard Area, as well as within the buffer of the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area "ESLHA"), pursuant to Chapter 23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological.events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.EdmondsWA.gov. The LiDAR map (inset) indicates that there is a steep slope (approximately 48%) just north of the house. The site is generally comprised of a rolling slope of 30% across the entire property rolling from west to east. Soils on the property are identified as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam series, which classifies the site as a potential erosion hazard. These slopes qualify as potential "geologically hazardous areas." Projects proposed further than 65' from the top or toe of the slope (50' buffer + 15' setback fromthe critical area) may not require a geotechnical report to address critical areas issues (of course, other departments may require a report to address their codes). Allowed Activities & Exempt Proposals Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.220. Similarly, certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed or exempt activity, please contact a Planner for more information. General Report Requirements Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to i complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. Landslide Hazard Areas Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding,, earthquake, or other geological events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060. In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require -a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Page 12 Determination: Study Required This review applies to the entire subject parcel. Depending on the location and project proposed relative to the identified critical areas, certain studies and reports may be required. Please contact the Planning Division at' 425.771.0220 if and when you have a specific development proposal for this site in order to discuss the various permits that will be required. Please note that tree removal on sites containing critical areas may first require a tree cutting permit, and the illegal removal of trees may result in penalties and steep fines (ECDC 1&45.070, ordinance #3828). Gina Coccia, Associate Planner May 10, 2012 Name, Title Signature Date Page 13 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.EdmondsWA.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION Inc. 189" DATE: May 10, 2012 TO: Donna Chilelli: 16508 76`h Avenue West, Edmonds WA 98026 RE: Planning Division comments for file BLD20120304 -- Chilelli Deck Replacement ......................................................................................:..................................................................:........ . Greetings, Thank you for submitting a building permit application for a deck replacement at 16508 76th Avenue West in the RS-12 zone. I have reviewed the above building permit application for the Planning Division and it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications will need to be addressed before the Planning Division review can continue. 1. Deck Footprint: Please clarify that there is no proposed change to the footprint of the existing deck. 2. Critical Areas / Geotechnical Report: As you are aware, there is a steep slope on your property. Steep slopes are a type of critical area (geologically hazardous area). Projects proposed on or near steep slopes, such as this, require a geotechnical report to ensure that the critical areas (steep slope) are not adversely impacted. We have a title in our code "Title 23 — Natural Resources" and chapters 23.40 (Environmentally Critical Areas General Provisions) and chapter 23.80 (Geologically Hazardous Areas) of this title are applicable to your project. Your geotechnical engineer will need to review ECDC 23.80.070.A.2 and ECDC 23.80.040.A.3 and submit a report describing how the proposed deck replacement will meet these requirements of our critical areas ordinaice. 3. Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHAI: Please be aware that this property is located within the mapped ESLHA, which may trigger other building permit requirements. Your permit coordinator (425.771.0220) would be able to tell you if any additional requirements are applicable. Please submit a written response to the above, alone with any revised plans to your Permit Coordinator: Linda Thornquist. All code citations can be found at: www.EdmondsWA.gov. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to working.with you on this project. Sincerely, gina coccia :: associate planner City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 5`h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 425.771.0220 x 1778 1 coccia@ci.edmonds.wa.us cc: BLD20120304 11 P a g e 8g0-,99_ STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works • Planning • Parks and Recreation • Engineering June 21, 1994 Dr. and Ms. Goodrick 16508 - 76th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98026 SUBJECT: YOUR LETTER DATED JUNE 14,1994 Dear Dr. and Ms. Goodrick, Mailed 6/21/94 LAURA M. HALL MAYOR The Engineering Division received your letter on June 15, 1994. As indicated on the telephone to Ms. Goodrick, the situation on 76th Ave. W. will continue to be monitored by Engineering staff. As indicated in the same telephone conversation, it is very difficult to make all sections of all roadways safe for all drivers. If a means is developed that will increase the safety at 76th Ave. W., City staff will certainly pursue its installation. It must be remembered, however, that obstructions placed in the roadway often become hazards themselves, so typically, they are not installed without due judgement and consideration. Thank you for your interest and concern in this matter. Sincerely, GORDON C. HYDE Engineering Coordinator GCH/sf Alberts GOODRICK.DOC • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan t i 1 Ur LIJI'IUll03 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING DIVISION :..�T FI THIS PERMI =Ws. ST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES Applicant to Complete Parts A• and B A; Permit to be issued to: : i,Vo _�fo. For Work at :(address or vicinity) Type of Work to be done: 7-1,--,eF1VCAV- VGONQ" •_ ,E� . 01c- w• (attach drawing when applicable) Time Required -- Start: Finish: Owner: ya, Co. Tf,Gi Name 9 9 Mailing Address -77¢ City State Zip Telephone Number Contractor: S,81n-E ,45 xa ()(/E Name State License Number Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone Number BINDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City.of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or.description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against• the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited *to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by'reason of granting this permit.' Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and. materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and: acceptance ;of the.restoration 'by.the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated.restoration fee) will -be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will.be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is subject.to inspection and restoration in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext. 220. I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection, purposes at -all times. Signature:Date: %-Zf- 7, Owner or Agent I TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY: Date Issued: Permit No.: %��35L Fee:',,4j �— Security Bond: Time Authorized: ?-6 c Date r F 60 Rev. lula10177 OPQUBLI.0 UTILITY DISTRICT N6.1 of $no-*,%mish County_ Iaja LA T h4 ( - -OUN'TYAREA Location kya,W Win, A_ Date_ -i - 77 X W.O. No. S 94 Z. ---;, I _LAW 1/4 2 'S 5 T 4- R Revision Scale -in = z0e_-_-0 Reason for work _Z K) r- e- A.,J=. A Engineer As Built UjG. File No. ZZ, S Approvals PERMIT REQUIRED iType CITY 0E ECAd I Date Granted I I Transf-Cardl I Polo Dept. I Map Post lCircuitMapi I FOREIGN CONTACTS Company I-W-1 J.RN.No. — Fees required Yes® NoO Type 1EIEZ2. -+-- PMr. Date 9 4 Amount 215. EASEMENT Grantor DcOe'dranted I Date Released For Construction Date Work Completed By Foreman Circuit Number 12 - 3 Z_ -Substation 2. IS F= t'J - 5 '3 cog V VGA LTA(5r-- XNST :51 rlsmvt &,wr.> rz-L4K1 CSC)Mr_pA Wr,l::) TC) PlEt;�, 6,1. rzrk,14F_z� 4Nr> ^ ',: N 07 E r--;, . ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Exempt under District SEPA procedures, Section I I I -A Paragraph Jaz , ltemJ-5— Date qZ ICI By C�AT>Mnis Interpretation Referred To: Date— BY O.H. U.G. Cond Add— Remv-__,_� Sewer Gas lBackhoe ' -----KV ClotO�L_Plml Clct FtPH Ckt Ft W.O. No. 23 S I '- '- I i • STREET FILE May 30, 1978 MEMO TO: Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: VARIANCE OF LOT SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR SEPTIC TANK AT 16508 76TH AVENUE WEST VARIANCE NO. V-43-78/ j We have reviewed the subdivision, building permit and septic disposal system application. We recommend approval.of the variance for the following reasons: 1.. The total square footage in the two lots. of the subdivision exceeds 40;000 square feet. This would, therefore, make it possible to meet the criteria of 20,000 square foot lot size for the purpose of a septic tank. 2. The septic tank disposal system design meets the minimum requirements of the City of Edmonds. 3. The lot arrangement has little bearing in this case on the location of the proposed house and, septic tank system. If the lot lines were changed the house and septic disposal system would be constructed in the same location as proposed at the present time. RHA:LRL:ej �30 RHA Date `A m'n. Se Date C ITY OF E D M 0 N D S TO: LU ~ Q LU SUSPENSE DATE: MAYOR As We Discussed Investigate and report Take Appropriate Action Prepare Letter/Memo for My Signature Mayor's Signature Previously Ref'd Status of Action? For your Information Note & File Return to: MAYOR'S ADMIN. ASS'T. CHIEF of POLICE CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK COMMUN. DEVELOP. DIR. FINANCE DIRECTOR FIRE CHIEF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COMMENTS: r e v! e u,) Vof f-rx s c C-5 -Qaq.. ` K� FROM: Ee i,r /xf cd e DATE: ';'r , CTA�T 10 C ,v U Ways l �CK-C.0 i.'bO CD00' 44 ; VE4150F��87 ,4,- - • STREETFILE* � May 30, 1978 MEMO TO: Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: VARIANCE OF LOT, -SIZE REQUIREMENT FOR,, SEPTIC'TANK AT 16508 76TH AVENUE WEST VARIANCE NO. V-43-78 -- We have reviewed the subdivision, building permit and septic disposal system application. We recommend approval of the variance for the following reasons: 1. The total square footage in the two lots of the subdivision exceeds 40,000 square feet. This would, therefore, make it possible to meet the criteria of 20,000 square foot lot size for the purpose of a septic tank. 2. The septic tank disposal system design meets the minimum requirements of the City of Edmonds. 3. The lot arrangement has little bearing in this case on the location of the proposed house and . septic tank system. If the lot lines were changed the house and septic disposal system would be constructed in the same location as proposed at the present time. RHA:LRL:ej .rj'�,:i+✓+ttsT� " � ' " 4+i&h�'r^"n '°" '�^`"'Y"�'�'^�+"� - ri'',*pP,r�aYV�'°L'�r CITY OF EDMONDS `E IV E D Permit No. RE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SEp 1 , 1991 Issue Date I 1 A. • Owner: 1�Washington Natural Gas Company B. • Contractor: mercer Street Name Ieailin Address G 0M P Mailing Address . eagle WA 98111 L1—►3,- 91 City State Zip City State Zip. a aTH ET FILE. _ State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of. Construction: 16510 and 16508 . 76 Avenue West Type of Work to be Done: Permission is requested to Install' 2" PE IP Main in 76 Avenue W and Services to 16508 and 16510 76 Avenue West. Per Attached Drawing: 910=134 IR 6043-3 1 D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family. ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily XX Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y N F. • Size of Cut: X APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and. by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims -of any, kind or-descriptiop whatsoever, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of itsrdepirtments or enr ldyee , i4luding or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, cour costs, and a%to �rCey ees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 192KNIALHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces,`at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. `• • A 24 hour.notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 171-3202 . . • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance -with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at.all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: September 3, 1991 Owner or Contractor. This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: ..I I { Time Authorized Void after `1,i days. Special Conditions: Ewm SENIM- f WXwt A4AW RELEASED BYA. Data ,, PERMIT FEE: 3b . Restoration Fee: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions: INSPECTED BY. Date NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Erig. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund III - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July .CfTY of EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT t; rr14 For Inspection Call'771-3202 PERMIT NO. 07269 NO�+/�,rWORM, • / • L.YINNWQO=LIE' Address of Construction: r. (tQJD 0 �(��' 1g• �%-i Property Legal Description (Include all easements):. Lod q0- -7-7 Owner and/or Builder: N. 6_vane/c Contractor & License No: 000rleY_ Single Family Residence X Multi -Family (No. of Units ) Commercial (No. of fixture Units ) Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right- of -Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Y Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify that I have read and shall comply with the items listed on the back. Permit Fee: 3o.00 Trunk Charge: 02�3.00 Assessment Fee: Partial Inspection: Issued By: Date Issued: / 0(0) Receipt No.: � L11 Comments Final Inspection Approved: 3 -5 $S Date Ini-t4hl Rejected:, Reason ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** 9 White Copy File Green Copy - Inspector Date Date Initial Date Initial Buff Copy - Applicant The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing MCAO.comw EASEMENT NO. ---------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS ❑ LID lqo..-2.1-(:) ----- ASMT. No OWNER r -------------------------------- CONTRACTOR --- P�--rFa-F-us r --------------- PERMIT No. JOB ADDRESS ---- -4 - ---------- ----- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. -A� ------- -------------------- BLOCK NO- Q;'lDP �Z-)7740-7-77 4'lc.cLWlE 16.5 NAME OF ADDITION ------------- ---- ---------------- ..................... ------ --------------------------- -------------------------------- L5'bp 4"C.O.W56 ?'JDP 0'r W. C�*.Vjlc CAP I-M PWW4=1-1 1/75 (REVA 1/78) N ME.ADOWDALE RD PJot--- !L--. 1 Call 1-800-424-5555 48 hours prior to construction to locate utilities 2 Survey not required 3 Lay direct burial warning wire over all direct burial PE pipe 4 Install one pound anode for every 1000' of locating wire 5 FIELD LOCATE ALL 0-rkUTIE5 (2 5T 5W G, MA\NTAI N A 5 ' HORIZONTAL- AND 3' VERTICAL CI.ENP,&NCE FROM ALL CITY UTJLITIES s i f 1 f i 1 � I. R. 6043-3 i PE CAP _ 52 Co50 2 no f4- GAUGE DETECT WIRE 05 9+0 170 I 280� , 2" SDR-I l PIPE 2G O EDMONDS NE 7- 27-4- r! '� r 158• Cv`� 15Co. G 8 - " PE IP MAI N EXT " TO KO508 1(o AU w .1BL= 8 19 91 i 910-134 LOT 4 P.L. 2001 �, ,•, .,.j'•', 3' LOT 5 LOT 6 ,—S'TRA wr/ IAA rrL A' o5zoM T®7,4L 25- s p P1• I, Y y'r) OWNER/CON-►+"?,'ACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (1:48) (E) Ccncrte to remain (1 c ire Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused a Or cCCUrt. d-wring tho permitted project. 011 PROPERTY OWNER: CHILELLI DONNA MARIA ADDRESS: 16508 76TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026-4917 PARCEL# 00513109700501 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: MEADOWDALE BEACH BLK 097 D-01 - LOT A CITY OF EDMONDS SP S-25-87 REC UND AF NO 8711250070 / BEING PTN LOTS 5 & 6 BLK 97 & VAC STREETS Township 27 Range 04 Section 07 Quarter NE ZONING: RS-12 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" (1:120) )TE: disturbed soils will be compost amended STORMWATER MANAGEMENT N/A PROPOSED PROJECT - < 50OFT LAND DISTURBANCE - NO UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V - B LOT AREA: 0.28 Acre (121197 SF) PROJECT WITH THIS PERMIT: REPLACE EXIST. DECK LOT COVERAGE (measured to outside walls): EXIST. STRUCTURE: 11429 SF (NO MODIFICATION) EXIST. DECK > 36" above Ground To be reel aced 861 SF 2,290 SF TOTAL COVERAGE: = 18.8 % SF EXIST. DECK < 36" 253 SF To be replaced IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1978 BLDG ROOFTOP 1,931 SF pis y77TOOL SHED ROOFTOP I f'r CONCRETE DRIVEWAY: 1.605 SF 7GRAVEL WALKWAY: 207 SF TOTAL: .3ey3 SF PROPOSAL: REPLACE ALL DECKS 263 SF BY EIPUNEERING � �yT 7/,, APPROVED_ BY PLANNING G,�•a-t_ 07•�5•t2 Zone R'S • 1 'L. FILE Corner Flag UREET Setbacks Required Actual Front_,. Sides 1.0 E U Rear Other JUN 2 5 2012 Hei tZ BUIlAING DEPAR<iMENT (P 11 S / 12 K-V—A-Z," P-cf(>Y't ciN Or- EDMONDS C�jzotz-��o`f tecinstruct LLC A 0 8 Telephone (206) 553 9076 A No 6830 NE Bothell Way- Suite C PMB 181 Kenmore W 98 2 sun ENGINEERING OWNER: Chilelli Donna Maria SHEET ADDRESS: 16508 76th AVE W, Edmonds, WA 98026 PARCEL NO.: 00513109700501 DESCRIPTION: Deck Replacement DATE: 05/09/12 TSCALE: as noted [ENGINEER: Roland Heimisch, P. E.