Loading...
16900 76TH AVE W (2).PDF111111111111 6173 16900 76TH AVE W .���ere�to: �g �°�o�� �d��cTm+Gs ""NO EXCISE TAX REQUIRED City of Lynnwood FEB 2 6 2014 P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046-5008 KIRKS SIEVERS, Snftft c mry TMOM By_ KiRKE SIEVERS STORMWATER DRAIN UTILITY EASEMENT THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD (hereinafter "Grantor"), hereby conveys and grants to Steve Fisher, his successors and assigns (hereinafter "Grantee"), from the following described property: See attached Exhibit A S 7 _TZI _" A permanent easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the following described portion of the above -described property: See attached Exhibit B The Grantee shall have the right, without prior institution of any suit or proceeding at law, at times as may be necessary, to enter upon the property or easement for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a stormwater drain, together with all mains, valves and connections thereto (the "Facility"), together with the right of ingress to and egress from that property for the foregoing purposes. The Grantor and Grantee, by executing, accepting and recording this easement, do hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows: 1. The Grantee is the owner of Parcel# 27040700101000, commonly known as 16900 76TH AVE W, Edmonds, WA. The Grantee agrees that Grantee is jointly and severally liable for operating and maintaining the Facility, and Grantee agrees that upon a failure to so maintain, the Grantor may perform maintenance, repairs, or replacement of the Facility and bill Grantee for its proportionate share of the cost of such repair, maintenance or replacement. 2. The Grantee shall, if either the property or easement is disturbed by the installation maintenance, or removal, of the Facility, restore the surface of the property or easement as nearly as possible to the condition in which it existed at the commencement .of maintenance, removal, repair or replacement. 3. The Grantee shall protect and save harmless Grantor from and against any and all claims, demands, loss, damage, expense and liability of every kind and description and for any damage to or loss or destruction of property suffered by Grantor, or by any persons, firms, or corporations, because of the Grantee's negligent installation, operation "1 ^ .1 STREET FILE i Exhibit A CITY OF LYNNWOOD PARCEL NO.27040700107100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; THENCE NORTH 01°11'45" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION (SAID EAST LINE ALSO BEING THE CENTER LINE OF 76TH AVENUE WEST. FORMERLY KNOWN AS MEADOWDALE ROAD) A DISTANCE OF 602.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 61033'10" WEST 22.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY MARGIN OF 76TH AVENUE WEST AND ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF BROWNS POINT ROAD; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 61033'10" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERN MARGIN OF BROWNS POINT ROAD A DISTANCE OF 198.53 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, PASSING. THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36028'02" A DISTANCE OF 76.38 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF BROWNS POINT ROAD TO A POINT WHICH IS THE BEGINNING OF THE DEPARTURE FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF BROWNS POINT ROAD; THENCE NORTH 89003'05" WEST, 260.41 FEET (249.34 FEET DESCRIPTION); THENCE NORTH 00008-06" WEST (NORTH DESCRIPTION), 279.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89003'05" WEST 233.28 FEET TO A POINT 339.87 FEET EAST OF THE GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE; THENCE NORTH 40031'21" WEST, 160.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89003'05" WEST, 160.72 FEET TO THE GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE TO THE SOUTH CORNER OF LOT 2, EDMONDS TIDE LANDS; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 43, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE TIDE LANDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 43; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 43 AND LOT 42 OF SAID PLAT TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 42; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE AND THE EASTERLY PROJECTION THEREOF TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT -WAY -LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE (FORMERLY THE GREAT WESTERN) RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M.; THENCE SOUTH 89003'05" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TOGA POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 89003'05" EAST, 537.37 FEET (538.90 FEET DESCRIPTION) FROM SAID GOVERNMENT MEANDER LINE; j THENCE SOUTH 38005'41" EAST 377.14 FEET (375.75. FEET DESCRIPTION); THENCE SOUTH 24001'3T' WEST 75.01 FEET (75.00 FEET DESCRIPTION); THENCE SOUTH 24001'36" WEST 58.05 FEET; or maintenance of the Facility; provided, however, that this hold harmless shall not apply to Grantor's negligence. 4. The Grantor warrants that the Grantor has good title to the above property and warrants the Grantee title to, and quiet enjoyment of, the easement conveyed hereby. 5. All right, title and interest which may be used and enjoyed without interfering with the easement rights conveyed are reserved to the Grantor. 6. Grantor covenants that no digging, tunneling, or other form of construction activity shall be done on the easement or on Grantor's property which would disturb or damage the Facility, unearth or undermine the Facility, or endanger the lateral support to the Facility. 7. Should either party hereto, or their heirs or assigns, institute suit to enforce any covenant or right granted herein, the prevailing party shall recover its costs of litigation, including a reasonable attorney's fee. 8. The covenants contained herein are intended to and shall run with the land and shall benefit and bind the parties and their respective successors and assigns. DATED this aL(1 day of, 20_L�_ � Aon��� (May , City of Lynnwood) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ,1�7arlsgL) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that L7 ; ck is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that the signed this in stated that she/he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor of the City of Lynnwood to be the free and voluntary act of such municipal corporation for the uses and purposes uIentioned in the instrument. DATED this 2 4AA,\— day of Oct_ Ole GO 9'cP �10t Fes', i NAME: 1 Gam- P Js z (print name) % Oy;'•ro tie Ae Notary Public in and for the State of Washington � �g8ti NG Ot'o��= Commission Expires: A -A O —t si Exhibit A (con't) THENCE SOUTH 23040'46" WEST 23.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26°18'04" EAST 50.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09°04'42" EAST 52.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78018'22" EAST 159.29 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 76TH AVENUE WEST; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 78018'22" EAST 20.34 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 7 WHICH IS ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF 76TH AVENUE WEST; THENCE SOUTH 01011'4S" WEST ALONG SAID EAST;LINE 138.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Exhibit B 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION STRIPS OF LAND 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH HAVING 5.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED EASEMENT CENTERLINE WITHIN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 7; THENCE NORTH 01o11'45" EAST 602.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61033'10" WEST 22.50 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF MEADOWDALE ROAD; THENCE NORTH 01011'45" EAST 132.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78018'22" WEST 76.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 12011'36" WEST 40.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42006'09" WEST 17.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF BROWNS POINT ROAD AND TERMINUS OF THE EASEMENT CENTERLINE. CONTAINING 578 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exhibit B (con't) CITY OF LYNNWOOD 'PARCEL# 27040700107100 a �� RECORD OF SURVEY ' A.F.# 200301225001 `'off I 30' �A I � � I STEVEN FISHER �+ 16900 76TH AVE W o EDMONDS, WA 98026 PARCEL# 27040700101000 RECORD OF SURVEY \ \ A.F.# 200301225001 z N Na Z— N C � 7� O N7878�.w 29, 159 S1211.36-W \ 40.22' \ S42,06.09aW / 10' STORM DRAIN J J EASEMENT I \ 578 SQ. FT. N� ttr' % zo 04 0//V - \ '�oqa oqo I W of � � \ ISP olvos tis'�3 _.L LI SCALE: 1 " = 50' ?2 w DATE: 10/10/13 In PORTION OF GOV'T LOT 2 IN THE NE c 1 /4 ' SEC. 7, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M. - Z EAST QUARTER CORNER 7 8 BENCHMARK SURVEYING LLC 11915 44TH DR. SE PRIVATE STORM . DRAIN EASEMENT EVERE17, WA9szos 20&396-3199 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 206-3 / / PROPOSED WATER LINE EXISTING APPX. 30" CEDAR M SF :[STING )NCRETE '.IVE AND lKWAYS i �vv � •I I I � . I � 3 EXISTING cv) I APPX. 3 " v' CEDAR I o................ ..... o° 8 00 .... ..... ..... uo °0 148.3' o, o°A o 0 0 6 a o / � C Q. o A O \ 1 `vim / o ° F _ J 50.3'D r o° S)t l,8% ppOSQ j ��_ / o , B 14 8.8/49.5 o , I: o _ m. o C6 CB a I N y T Y�E IL I N V= /(4 3' , ------ o %0 148.82' _. ° D � , 148.72' — o 149.85' ffREET FIEF 9 ;ainow ■ FOR l INTER BE IN o Lo EXIS— EXIS— w WATE Lo -Lo Q� 0 z EXIST WOOD R E 51- V DOUGL/- TO REP CONST% AROUNI ZONE E 1151.37' I� HF REC IVEC SEP 0 9 2014 ENGINEERING DIVISION IN The V .& I O Vj k-r c of L�. EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION EXHIBIT MAP PORTION OF GOV'T LOT 2 IN THE NE 114 SEC. 7, T. 27 N., R. 4 E., W.M. _ Vo ems- 1 30 CITY OF LYNNWOOD `��9 ��� I / PARCEL# 27040700107100 � STEVEN FISHER 48. 16900 76TH AVE W A F. 200301225U01 N = EDMONDS, WA 98026 I PARCEL# 27040700101000 I I ti RECORD OF SURVEY A.F.# 200301225001 Z \ ols EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS FOR DETERMINING BUILDING HEIGHT \ ELEV.=148.32 ELEV.=150.30 'G O ` cp PROP �qRq� � \ � N78y82zlW 95l ( \\ �74� op ELEV= 150.61 159.z9' 20' PROPOSED iO'- STORM EASEMENT I Q e,Q s�aj. C ui w C" > Q �eFR S pp '>>s3 !os`�To'�. I T Q I o SCALE: 1' = 50' o DATE: 10/14/13 \ q ,qO /� \ \ I w t0 OF c VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 �`3 CONTROLUNG BENCHMARK: CITY " OF LYNNWOOD BENCHMARK NO. 114 SO' CONVERTED TO NAVD88, USING NGS VERTCON N ELEVATION = 287.79 NAVD88 c'j o z SITE BM MAG.NAIL ELEV.=152.28 NAVD88 DATUM EAST QUARTER CORNER 7 18 BENCHMARK SURVEYING LLC STEVEN FISHER 1191544TH DR -SE PROPOSED GARAGE EVER=, WA 98208 206-396-3199 EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS RESUB OCT 16 2013 BUILDING] DEPAR6CMENT CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DATA LSTMETFILB SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Name: ; S Date: '7 _ Site Address: I�! p Q A Tax Parcel a,?o q 0­7 p of 0/ O U Project Description: Ve„,, l q 6q d�� a: a�� Plan Check #: ao i3o�� y Reduced Site Plan Provided: Y S NO) Zoning: Map Page: Corner Lot: (YES / NO) Flag Lot: (YES / NO) Critical Areas Determination Study Required ❑ Waiver SEPA Determination: 5a Exempt ❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Required SetbacksAge— Street: Side: Side: Rear: �- Actual Setbacks Street: ca Side: J Side: Rear: ❑ Detached Structures':( ❑ Rockeries: ❑ Fences/Trellises: ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: ❑ Stairs Deck: Bui/din Height Datum Point: Datum Elevation: Maximum Height Allowed: S �(9L(. Actual Height: b Lk ._ Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: 1-- Lot Area: `3 y Li 11 , Maximum Lot Coverage: 350/6 Proposed: v Lot Coverage Calculations: °`''e'� d -3 — ADU Created: (YES / Subdivision: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / Comments Plan Review By: L-11 Planning Qata Farts 07-1409.doc PLANNING DATA STREET FILE Plan Review By: Planning Data For, 07-14-09.a« ,'�, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. (.;eoleclnticnl & Pnrement F.nSrrteering • Hpdrogeologp • CeoermironnreWal • Irra,ectinrt & 7islbiX April 22, 2013 HWA Project No. 2013-026-21 STREET FILE Mr. Steven Fisher 16900 761h Avenue West RECEIVED Edmonds, Washington 98026 JUN 2 7 2013 Attention: Mr. Fisher DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Subject: INFILTRATION EVALUATION 6900 76T" AVENUE WEST EDMONDS,WASHINGTON 98026 Dear Mr. Fisher, This report presents the results of a soil infiltration evaluation performed to determine the feasibility of the proposed LID stormwater BMP's required for on -site stormwater management for a Small Site Category 1 residential development on the lot at the above referenced address in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our assessment was to determine whether the site soil and groundwater conditions would support an on -site storm water disposal system consisting of a Pre -Designed Flow Control BMP as described in City of Edmonds Handout E72B. Our work included making visual observations of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions exposed in five hand borings and preparing this letter. PROJECT LOCATION The subject property consists of a residential lot located within the SE'/4, of the NE'/4, Section 7, Township 27N, Range 4E, on the west side of 76th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington (see Figure 1). SITE DESCRIPTION A site and exploration plan (Figure 2) prepared by HWA utilizing site plans provided by the owners architect, depicts the approximate footprints of the proposed new garage structure and concrete driveways. GEOLOGY Geologic information for the project area was obtained from the map entitled Preliminary Surfrcial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles 21312 30th Drive SE by Mackey Smith (1975). This map shows the near -surface deposits in the Suite Ito vicinity of the subject property consist of Quaternary aged Whidbey Formation. Bothell, WA 98021.7010 Tel: 425.774.0106 Fax: 425.774.2714 www.hwageo.coni e� l(1�I,Qf�a�,041mmwud vtofi-�4e-iO4 April 22, 2013 HWA. Project No. 2013-026-21 The Whidbey Formation consists of a medium bedded sand, silt and clay. This unit considered to be of non -glacial fluvial origin. The Whidbey Formation soils are generally compact and relatively impermeable, and locally susceptible to slope instability. A portion of this map depicting the geology as mapped by Smith (1975) for the local project vicinity is shown on Figure 3. :`G According the Soil Survey of Snohomish County map prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS -web soil survey) the soils within the local project area are comprised of Alderwood-Urban, 8 to 15 percent slopes which may contain Kitsap, Ragnar, Indianola and Everett soils. Kitsap soils, which correlate with the Whidbey Formation are comprised of soils developed over lacustrine sediments. Locally, these soils have been disturbed during urbanization and consist of silt loam to silty clay loam. Permeability of Kitsap soils is slow and they often exhibit seasonal perched water at shallow depth. SITE EXPLORATION On April 12th, 2013, a geologist from HWA observed the site soil conditions exposed in five hand auger borings. The hand auger borings were conducted to depths ranging from 4 to 5 feet. Site soil conditions encountered were described by our geologist at each of the hand auger locations. The approximate locations of the hand auger explorations are shown on Figure 2. The locations were chosen in areas where infiltration trenches or bioretention facilities could potentially be installed. A legend of the terms and symbols mentioned on the hand boring logs is presented on Figure 4. Logs of the hand borings, indicating observed seepage and soil conditions are attached as Figures 5 through 9. Soil samples were taken at selected intervals within each hand boring excavation and sealed in plastic bags for future examination. SOIL PROFILE The subsurface soils encountered in the test pits are consistent with the mapped geology of the site area and are described briefly as follows: Topsoil: - Surficial topsoil layers were encountered in all hand borings, and consisted predominately of very loose, dark brown, somewhat organic, sandy silt to silty sand with woody debris. This soil unit ranged from about 5 to 15 inches in thickness where hand borings were conducted. Shallow, perched groundwater was encountered in this soil unit at location where it was immediately underlain by fine grained native soils at the locations ofHH-1, HH-2 and HH-4 at depths ranging from 4 to 15 inches below the existing ground surface. Undocumented Fill: - Beneath the topsoil at the locations of HH-3 and HH-5, a layer of loose to soft, light brown to brown, silty sand to sandy silt was encountered that appeared to consist of Fisher Residence Infiltration Evaluation 2 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. April 22, 2013 HWA Project No. 201.3-026-21 locally derived native glacial soils used as fill during past grading practices. Where encountered, this soil layer ranged from at least 2 to 3 or more feet thick. Glacial Drift:- Beneath the topsoil at the locations of HH-2 and HH-4, a layer of medium dense to dense, light brown to reddish brown, silty sand with gravel was encountered that appeared to consist of glacial drift soils. These soils were weathered near the surface and exhibited a somewhat heterogeneous structural appearance (i.e. without bedding). Where encountered, this soil layer ranged from at least l to 1.5 feet thick. Whidbey Formation: - At depth, in all of the hand borings except HH-5, a layer of medium stiff to stiff; olive gray to grayish brown; silty clay to clayey silt with varying amounts of fine sand was encountered. Locally, this soil unit contained thin beds of silty sand that were saturated at the time of our exploration. This material is interpreted as belonging to the Whidbey Formation. The silt and clay layers contained in the Whidbey Formation are relatively impermeable and typically cause localized perched groundwater conditions. Sandy soil that is interbedded with (between) or overlies a silt or clay layer is often saturated during the wet season. Because of the somewhat layer -cake nature of the Whidbey Formation comprised of alternating clay and sandy (often water bearing) layers when it is exposed along hillsides, it can be subject to slope instability. GROUND WATER Ground water seepage was observed in all hand borings except HH-2, within sandy layers either perched on the top or sandwiched between the silts and clays of Whidbey Formation soils. We expect, this situation is somewhat seasonal, being most common during wet season periods, when locally infiltrating water may become perched on the surface of shallow low permeability deposits at this site. Color mottling exhibited by the glacial drift and Whidbey soils indicate that seasonal perched groundwater seepage levels may rise to within about 1 to 2 feet of the surface on site. However, it is anticipated that ground water conditions will vary depending on the season, variations in local subsurface conditions, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS In general, the site is underlain by interbedded silts and clays that are overlain by a thin veneer of undocumented fill and/or glacial drift soils. The fine grained silt and clays soils are relatively impermeable, likely with an infiltration rate of much less than 0.125 inches per minute, and, therefore, not suitable as stormwater receptors for pre -designed LID BMP's such as infiltration trenches or bioretention cells (City of Edmonds Handout #E72B). The relatively coarse grained soils interbedded with the silts and clays encountered on site were for the most part saturated during the time of our exploration which also coincides with the time of the year when the need to control stormwater is paramount and therefore are not likely to have capacity to effectively accommodate additional water. We conclude that stormwater control utilizing infiltration is not Fisher Residence Infiltration Evaluation 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. Apri122, 2013 HWA Project No. 2013-026-21 feasible at this site. Consideration should be given to alternative measures such as on -site detention coupled with overflow conveyed to the nearest public stormwater disposal system or discharge area, as appropriate. CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for your information in support of the permitting of a residential development on your property. Experience has shown that subsurface soil and groundwater conditions can vary significantly over small distances and over time, hence, we may not have seen every condition and even those we saw can change with time. The scope of work did not include environmental assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site. O.O We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact either of the undersigned at (425) 774-0106. . Sincerely, HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. rf (3 Steven E. Greene, L.E.G Engineering GeologistNice-President Fisher Residence Infiltration Evaluation 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. April 22, 2013 HWA Project No. 2013-026-21 Attachments: Figure 1: Project Site & Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site & Exploration Plan Figure 3: Geologic Map Figure 4: Legend of Soil Classifications Figures 5 through 9: Logs of Exploratory Hand borings: HH-1 through HH-5 REFERENCES City of Edmonds, Handout #E72B: Low Impact Development (LID) Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Simplified Sizing. City of Edmonds -Development Information. Smith, Mackey (1975), Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King Counties, Washington. United States Geological Survey, Geologic Map GM-14. Fisher Residence Infiltration Evaluation 5 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. ALTERNATE ( ` BIORETENTION I LOCA ON I EXISTING I w HH-5 I WOOD FENCE �r a= z g REPLACE c�i 1.031 SF - Z \I EXISTING I DRIVEWAY 1 v ram, 7j f/�S� I SHEET FLOW TO LAWN � `T0VIA 2% � O 4(l/ OQj'pFTF 71 p� S PE CROSS a TIGHTLINE ,HH-3 I FROM GUTTERS ' I ROPOSED GARAGE OOF, AREA ,' i HH-4 IN LT I wn TENCH I f e LEGEND MINIMUM REQUIREMENT I ECT PLLC. HH-5 HAND BORING DESIGNATION NORTH STORMWATER SITE PLAN AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION r - 20'-0' ' 1.108 S.F. OOTPRINT 2.184 S.F. v �,'^• LIVING AREA EXISTING' GAS RAGE DS DS f EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXIST. o v90 DRAM IN ! 1.434 SF <a % DRIVE AND o WALKWAYS 11L S.F. r BIORETENTION CELL 1 OVERFLOW lz� HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN INFILTRATION EVALUATION FISHER RESIDENCE 16900 76T" AVENUE W. PROJECT NO. 2013-026 Map Symbol Unit Description of Artificial Fill North Qols Quaternary Landslide Deposits Qvr Vashon Recessional Outwash Qvt Vashon Glacial Till Qva Vashon Advance Outwash 17 Qe Esperance Sand ow Whidbey Formation Map taken From: Smith. 1975. GEOLOGIC MAP FIGURE NO. 3 INFILTRATION EVALUATION PROJECT NO. HWAGEOSCIENCES INC. FISHER RESIDENCE 16900 76TH AVENUE W. 2013-026 RELATIVE DENSITY OR CONSISTENCY VERSUS SPT N-VALUE COHESIONLESS SOILS COHESIVE SOILS Approximate Approxmate Density N (blowslft) Relative Density(%) Consistency N Mtowalft) Undreined Sheer Strength (psi) Very Loose 0 to 4 0 - 15 Very Soft 0 to 2 <260 Loose 4 to 10 15 - 35 Soft 2 to 4 250 - 500 Medium Dance 10 to 30 35 - 65 Medium stiff 4 to 8 500 - 1000 Dense 30 to 50 65 - 86 Stiff B to 16 1000 - 2D00 Very Dense over 60 86 - 100 Very SUR 16 to 30 200D - 4000 Hard over 30 >4000 USCS SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP DESCRIPTIONS Coarse Gravel and Clean Gravel •' GW Wall{paded GRAVEL Grained Gravelly Solis (Rle or no fines) o Q GP PoortySreded GRAVEL Sills More than 50% Of Coarse Gravel with o GM S@y GRAVEL Fraction Retained Fines (appreciable on No. 4 Sieve amount of fines) GC Clayey GRAVEL Sand and Clean Sand .• SWWe ll-graded SAND More than Sandy Solis (tittle or no tines) ;• SP PoorlyVaded SAND 60% Retained r Or More on No. of coarse Send with SM Silty SAND 200 Sieve 'Fines (appreciable $C Clayey SAND Size Fraction Passing amount of fines) No. 4 Sieve ML SILT Fine SIR CL Lean CLAY Grained Ltgndd Limit and Sills Clay Leas than 6046 — OL Organic SILT/Orgardc CLAY MH Elastic SILT 50% or More SUt Liquid Limit Passing and 50% or More CH Fat CLAY No. 20 No.200 Sieve c Slze OH Organic SILT/Orgardc CLAY Highly Orgardc Solis PT PEAT r � COMPONENT DEFINITIONS COMPONENT SIZE RANGE Boulders Larger than 12 in Cobbles 3 in to 12 In Grevel 3 in to No 4 (4.6mm) Coarse gravel 3 In to 314 In Fine gravel 314 In to No 4 (4.5mm) Send No. 4 (4.6 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 mm) Coarse sand No. 4 (4.6 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) Medium sand No. 10 (2.0 mm) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) Fine send No. 40 (0.42 mm) to Na 200 (0.074 mm) Silt and Clay Smaller then No. 200 (0.074mm) TEST SYMBOLS %F Percent Fines AL AtterbeM Limits: Pl. = Plastic Limit LL = LkpM unit CBR Cetifonda Bearing Ratio CN Consolidation DD Dry Density (pcf) DS Direct Shear GS Grain Size Distribution K Permeability MD MolsturelDensity Relationship (Proctor) MR Resillent Modulus PIO Photolonization Device Reading PP Podtet Penetrometer Approx. Compressive Strength (tsf) SG Specific Gravity TC Tdwdel Compression TV Tonne Approx. Shear Strength (lot) UC Unconfined Compression SAMPLE TYPE SYMBOLS ®2.0" OD Split Spoon (SPT) hammer with 30 In. drop) I(140lb. Shelby Tube 3.1i4" OD Split Spoon with Brass Rings OSmall Bag Sample Large Bag (Bulk) Sample Core Run Non-standard Penetration Test (3.(r OD split spoon) GROUNDWATER SYMBOLS Groundwater Level (measured at time, of drilling) T Groundwater Level (measured in well or open hole after water level stabilized) COMPONENT PROPORTIONS PROPORTION RANGE DESCRIPTIVE TERMS < 5% Clean 5 -12% Slightly (Clayey, Silty, Sandy) 12. 30% Clayey, Silty, Sandy, Gravelly 30 - 50% Very (Clayey, Silty, Sandy, Gravelly) Components are arranged in order of increasing quantities. NOTES: Sal classifications presented on exploration fogs are based on visual and laboratory observation. Soil descriptions are presented ►nthe following general order MOISTURE CONTENT DonsWWWstertcy4 color m x0er0f any) GROUP NAIL additions to group name (if ard moisture DRY Absence of moisture, dusty, content. Proportion, gradation, and angularity of consdhw ts, aaffanal conimnis, dry to the touch. (GEOLOGIC INTERPRETATION) MOIST Damp but no visible water. Please rarer to the discussion in the report text as well as the wooration logs for a more WET Visible free water, usually complete description of subsurface conditions. soli Is below water table. Infiltration Evaluation LEGEND OF TERMS AND WWI, Fisher Residence SYMBOLS USED ON i��/� 16900 76th Ave W EXPLORATION LOGS HViIAC�EOSCIENCES il�l\w Edmonds WA PROJECT NO.: 2013-026 FIGURE: 4 LEGEND 2013WS.GPJ 4119113 07 DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosclences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: t feet DATE STARTED: 4/12/2013 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger CASING ELEVATION f feet DATE COMPLETED: 4/12/2013 SAMPLING METHOD: GRAB LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 J Z m 0. a y c O o DESCRIPTION 0. 8 0 :. Very loose, brown to dark broom, sandy SILT to silty SAND, i i•� moist to wet. Water perching on day/sR layer under topsoil. CL I N [TOPSOIL] Medium stiff to stiff, mottled light brown and gray, clayey SILT S•1 1 to SlIty CLAY, moist Btodry teAure, streaks of wdde mottling. O [WHIDBEY FORMATI014 0 S-2 t I 6- 1 8- 7 8 9 10 Medium dense, brown, silty fine to medium SAND, moist to wet. interbedded layers of silty fine to medium SAND and slit, 0 8-3 saturated sandy layers. Handhole terminated at 6.67 feet below ground surface due to ground water seepage. Ground water seepage was encountered at 6.26 feet and stablitLed at 4.03 feet after 1 hour. NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions apppplIlea only at the specified location and on the date Indicated and therefore may not necessarily 9 indicative of other times and/or locations. 0 1 ' "-10 0 ZO 40 60 80 100 Water Content ("/o) Plastic Limit 1—A" Liquid limit Natural Water Content Infiltration Evaluation HANDHOLE UVAFisher Residence HH-1 HMCWSCffNC M 16900 76th Ave W PAGE: 1 of 1 Edmonds, WA PROJECT NO.: 2013-026 FIGURE 5 HANDHOL 2013-M.GPJ 4119113 unrrzlrvu—,uvwwnrv�-lwAi;ewc4ences mc. ZURFACE ELEVATION: t feet DATE STARTED: 411L/2U1'J DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger CASING ELEVATION t feet DATE COMPLETED: 4/12/2013 SAMPLING METHOD: GRAB LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 W C) "' m z y I1J ff�-- O N LLa! J urm Z m gg a (L i o O o y' DESCRIPTION 06 o 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- Very rown to d8flK brown, MOY-bTUT0s1A, mist to wet. Water parching on day/silt layer under topsoil. [TOPSOIL] Loose to medium dense, light brown; gravelly, silty SAND, moist. [WEATHERED GLACIAL DRIFT] Medium dense to dense, mottled light gray and reddish brown, silty gravelly SAND, moist. O S-1 [GLACIAL DRIFT] Stiff to very stiff, light gray and brown, slightly dayay SILT, dry. Blodry texture. [1NHIDBEY FORMATION] 0 Increased % Clay content. S 2 Increased _%_ Clay content._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Medium dense, light brown to brown, Interbedded sltty One to medium SAND and sandy GRAVEL, moist 0 S-3 Handhole terminated at 6.5 feet below ground surface. No ground water seepage was encountered during the exploration. 0 20 40 60 80 100 Water Content (9/6) Plastic Limit Liquid Limit • Natural Water Content NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions apppltes only at the specified location and on the date Indicated and therefore may not necessarily be Indicative of other times and/or locations, Infiltration Evaluation HANDHOLE Fisher Residence HH-2 IMGEOSCIENCES INC 16900 76th Ave W PAGE: 1 of 1 Edmonds, .WA PROJECT NO.: 2013-026 FIrAIIRF• 6 HANDHOL 2013-026.GPJ 4119113 e—DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosclences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: :k feet DATE STARTED: 4/1212013 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger CASING ELEVATION t feet DATE COMPLETED: 411212013 SAMPLING METHOD: GRAB LOGGED BY: 0. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 W ui Cr Uj 0 ca 0 Uj u) -1 j IL 0. uj O M DESCRIPTION LU IL 0— SM Loose, brown to dark brown, very silly, slightly gravelly SAND. molst. [RLUTOPSOIL] - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , brown to dark brown, very silty SAND to sandy SILT, - - hTL SM moist to wet. 2— SP Medium dense, brown to light browR Interbedded gravelly SM SAND and silly SAND, wet. Saturated In gravel layers. 0 S-1 Ground water seepage at 2.0 feet below ground surface (BGS). JWHIDBEYFORMATION] 3 - OS2 Hand hole terminated at 3.6 feet below ground surface due to, refusal on Wavell. Ground water seepage was observed at 2.0 4-1 feet BGS 10— NOTE: This tog of subsurface conditions I les only at the specified location and on the date Indicated and therefore may not necessar0yT.P1 Indicative of other times andfor locations. 1--9 1 . . . . . . .. . .. L- '0 0 20 ' 40 60 eo 100 Water Content (%) Plasm Umft M a liquid Limit Natural VJMK Content Infiltration Evaluation HANDHOLE Fisher Residence 'HH-3 HMMOSCIENCESINC 16900 76th Ave W PAGE: I of I Edmonds, WA PROJECT NO.: 2013-026 FIGURE: 7 HANDHOL 2013-M.GPJ 419M DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geoscienoes Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: * feet DATE STARTED: 4/12/2013 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger CASING ELEVATION * feet DATE COMPLETED: 4112/2013 SAMPLING METHOD: GRAB LOGGED SY: D. Coltrane LOCATION: See Figure 2 ry!) w (5 to Z .. W F O m J � o 0 ui Z W O O c DESCRIPTION a 0 o 0 SM Loose, brown to reddish brown, slightly gravelly, silty fine to medium SAND, moist to weL Wood bits, becoming wet at 1.25 feet below ground surface (BGS) [TOPSOILIFILL) 1 SZ SM 'Medium dense to dame, light gray and reddish brown, slightly $1 gravely silty SAND, moist. 0 [GLACIAL DRIFT) 2 SM Interbedded silty fine SAND and sandy SILT, moist Beds 1-r thick. 8-2 (WHIDBEY FORMATION) O 3 Beooming siltier with depth. 4 Medium soft to stiff, Bght ochre gray with oxide mottBng, slightly gravely, silty SAND to sandy SILT, moist to wet. 0 $3 i 5 Handhole terminated at 4.83 feet BGS due to refusal on gravel. Ground water seepage was observed at 1.25 feet and 4.67 feet BGS. 6 7 9 10 NOTE: This log of subsurface oondidons applies only at the specified location and on the date Indicated and therefore may not neoessarfty be Indicative of other times and/or locations. 0 1 2 3 4 6 8 7 e 9 L10 0 20 40 60 80 100 Water Content (%) Plastic Limit *-- 0 Liquid Limit Natural Water Content Infiltration Evaluation HANDHOLE Fisher Residence HH-4 ffi%C SCI NCB INC, 16900 76th Ave W PAGE 1 of 1 Edmonds, WA PROJECT NO._ 2013-026 FIGURE: HANDHOL 2013-02&GPJ 4119113 ' DRILLING COMPANY: HWA GeosClences Inc, SURFACE ELEVATION: t feet DATE .STARTED: 4/1y2013DATE COMPLETED, 4M212013 DRILLING METHOD: Hand Bucket Auger CASING ELEVATION t feet LOGGED BY: D. Coltrane SAMPLING METHOD: GRAB LOCATION: See figure 2 Uj ul O J ILLS m5 K e J O to O DESCRIPTION 0 0 �; • Loose, brown to light brown, silty slightly gravelly SAND, moist (fOP301UFiLL] 17 1 '' `t1 -- -- — --- 1 ML Soft to very soft, dark brown to brown. sandy SILT to silty SAND, moist to wet. IFILL) O S1 2 2 Burnt wood bits. Increasing SILT content. 3 Large gravel encountered. T Ground water seepage observed. S2 O 4 Handhote terminated at 4.0 feet below ground surface (BGS) due to refusal on gravel. Ground water seepage was observed at 3.33 feet BGS. 6 6 8 9 10 NOTE: This and therefore May of of necessarily lie 1 didatl enditions a as tthe of Otherspecified Hes and/or locations. location and On M date Indicated =A I W&GEOSCIENCES INC, iANDHOL 2013-028•GPJ 419113 Infiltration Evaluation Fisher Residence 16900 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 8 ` IL10 0 20 40 .60 80 tOD Water Content (9'e) Plastic Limit Liquid Limit Natural Water Content HANDHOLE HH-5 PAGE: 1 of 1 991113-026 FIn1JRE r. . . City of Edmonds Critical Area Notice of Decision .Applicant: a� r s Property Owner: Critical Area File #: CKAa p 1-2-0 0 7 � Permit Number: I�L-Z) a013 V 6 Site Location: 0©© 1-� t,, 1000 Parcel Number: Project Description: e—j, ILM 0 'DeA-e, VA onditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above. 1. ✓ There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. ❑ Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. ❑ Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160: 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; 3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of noncompliance. Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. ❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). Reviewer d )L-, 'I^- S'gnature -?- isr-13 Date Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved.. Revised 1211612010 PROPOSED WATER LINE I � IW I o co FOR l INTER BE IN ,i 3 EXISTING Ln cl I APPX. 3 - c" CEDAR = "' I o 148.93' z u o % App C 0. 50 o lNV k D S I. ,1 50.3" I .a o B 148.8" o - CB �— ° CB T Y�� IL _ INV= J43' NV - o — /90.01 SLOpli 75/ o i 148.7!714 ..85" STREETTILE 0 E 25'-0" 1151.37' EXIS- EXIS- WATE REC91VED SEP 0 9 2014 ENGINEERING DIVISIUN ry`'.a�, yrQE z - ... EAsting Garage ry Residential Parking Area 1 "= 20' ® Fence must bs locmied on private property - a Pruperty owner responsible fbr determining property Hines. hence s111,8 not eaelm or prevent arm to any City rdshitaticd etii$daa. '"r Pc?x� s vrm& mo-r c.v.m-ram A S,-rE PISTANC6 p 6STOLtCr1 W. Driveway _ Neighbors Hedge Line of site —{�= Vim.. zz. . MAINTAMO 3' cLeArZiftNCE AW4UW113 71ta WAT�r2 oriveway e I I I, ' g W ua o 'z I i O pewa -m U15 WEST of tN01;TM MgtZ" fl'No M AKA30=5. OWNER/CON ►RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CON'rROL AND DRAINAGE iHR. NOTICE REQ. A INSPECTION Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused or occurs during the permitted project, _/7 r k ? f:,CT 01 2012 0EVELOCMENT SERVICES S t�e, Pau n 0 C KEY TO SYMBOLS ® TRENCH DRAIN WITH STEEL GRATE AT DRIVEWAYS TIGHTLINED TO STORM SYSTEM - W- - WATER LINE I" MIN, COPPER, PLASTIC, PCO, CPVC OR PEX - -S- - STORMWATER TIGHTLINE 4" HOPE, PVC, OR CONCRETE SLOPE 0.5% MINIMUM MAINTAIN 18" DEPTH - -S8- SANITARY SEWER PIPE 4-6" HOPE OR CONCRETE SLOPE 0.5% MINIMUM MAINTAIN 18" DEPTH 136.52)8( SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS STORMWATER SMALL SITE REQUIREMENTS SMALL SITE CATEGORY I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 42 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION 000000000' BMP SILT FENCE OR STRAW BALES BMP TIRE WASH AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 44 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS MAINTAIN EXISTING SHEET FLOW TO DOWN SLOPE LAWN AREAS ON REPLACED DRIVEWAY MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #1 FLOW CONTROL TIGHTLINE IMPERVIOUS ROOF AREA OF THE DETACHED GARAGE TO THE CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM. DRIVEWAY AREAS ACCESSORY TO THE DETACHED GARAGE ARE ALSO TIGHTLINED TO THE CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM MINIMUM REQUIREMENT #9 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TO BE DETERMINED LEGAL DESCRIPTION I SEC 01 TWP 21 RGE 04ALL TH PTN SEI/4 NEI/4 SEC 1 DAF BEG AT EI/4 COR SDSEC I TH NOI*II 45E 602.21FT TH N61*33 IOW 22.5OFT TO WLY MGN MEADOWDALE RD t TPB TH CONT N61*33 IOW 198.53FT TAP OFCRV TH ON A CRY TO R HAVG RAO 120FT FOR 80.69FT TH N23*01 30W 141.15FT TH N09*213OW ILAIFT TAP OF CRY TH ON A CRY TO R HAVG RAD OF IIOFT DIST 61.93FT TH NI3*3210E 10.92FT TAP OF CRV TH ON A CRY TO L HAVG RAID OF 150FT DIST 118.01FT TO PT OFTANG OF SD CRV TO L TH TANG OF WH BEARS N31*33 48W TH S89*03 05E 15.21FT TH S38*05 41E 38L.41FT TO WLY MGNMEADOWOALE RD TH SOI*II 45W ALG SO WLY MGN 244.88FT TO TPB LESS THE WLY 4OFT TO CO RD t LESS BEG AT EI/4 COR SEC I TH N01*II 45E 602.21FT TH N61*33 IOW22.50FT TO WLY MGN MEADOWDALE RD TH TH N01*II 45E 132.31FT TPB TH N18*18 22W 159.29FT TH N09*04 42W 52.85FT TH N26*18 04W 50.90FT TH N23*40 46E 2?,.19FTTH N24*01 36E 58.05FT TH N24*0I 31EISFT TH S38*05 41E 203.80FT TH S01*II 45W ALG WLY MGN MEADOWDALE RD 112.51FT TO TPB PER SC 88-2-05251-1 l PX i ek C, s a o 0 .114 %� PARCEL 21040100101100 OWNED BY CITY OF LYNNWOOD WITH(( CITY OF EDMONDS 4C 1 u'IN o w 0 TYPE AREA NON REGULATED REGULATED_ LINE I NON REGULATED PRE 1911 ROOF AREA: 2,935 S.F. PRE 1911 LOWER DRIVEWAY 2,591 S.F. AND SIDEWALKS 5,526 S.F. LINE 2 REPLACED EXEMPT PRE 1911 DRIVEWAY: 1,031 SF LINE 3 NEW (POST 1911) ROOF AREA DRIVEWAY OUTSIDE ROOF OH:.604 1,815 S.F. 5F LINE 4 2,419 S.F. LINE 5 TOTAL AREA MITIGATED BY EXISTING STORMWATER SYSTEMS 0 S.F. LINE 6 REGULATED AREA NOT YET MITIGATED 2,419 S.F. LINE 1 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT O S.F. LINE 8 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY CONVENTIONAL SWM 2.419 S.F. EDMONDS STORMWATER SUPPLEMENT 2.3 For sites with existing single familg dwelling units, (as defined 1n Chapter 21.90.080 ECDC) a project that solelg replaces Impervious surfaces in -kind (footprint and Imperviousness of material does not Change, but not a structural foundation), shall not be considered replaced Impervious surface for the purposes of this chapter, unless the project site has I acre or greater of land -disturbing activities. 0.5 IN. BELOW HIGH POINT INSIDE DETENTION PIPE OVERFLOW PIPE - 1+F -a PT ►,nth At�tok t 6" MIN. MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE BOX OR RISER S_n 4 -pan -F.D I I,DWO D 00 ftIOLA VOW RIM ELEVATION r-LOCKING LID �- FINISH GRADE APPX. INV = 136.4 SAME ELEVATION � o N m 1 TO APPROVED am' COLLECTION POINT L--- 18" DETENTION PIPE 5/8" DIA. ORIFICE SIZE PER TABLEL EDMONDS STORMWATER SUPPLEMENT ='-� DETAIL OF CONTROL e CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE CONTROL CATCH BASIN c rRro4 O/e )VA, LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEC 01 TWP 21 RGE 04BEG AT EI/4 COR OF SEC 1 TH NOI*II 45E 602.21FT TH N61*33 IOW 22.50FT TO WLY MGN MEADOWDALE RD TH N01*II 45E 132.31FT TPB TH N18*18 22W 159.29FT TH N09*04 42W 52.85FT TH N26*1804W 50.90FT TH N23*40 46E 23.19FT TH N24*01 36E 58.05FT 1H N24*01 31E 15FT THS38*05 41E 203.80FT TH S01*II 45W ALG WLY MGN MEADOWDALE RD 112.51FT TPB - EXISTING SEWER LINE FIELD VERIFY EXISTING PIPE SIZE PRIOR TO 0 SEWER WORK AND SIZING ;9- %ti EXISTING- ryry``' Al APPX. 8" FIR INSTALL EROSION SEDIMENT PROTECTION ON EXISTING CATCH BASIN I P 141.08' 09af aftTe ?61L. CB RIM Coto CtAndaA6 EXISTING CITY STORM DRAIN 88' I Unit >NV = 138 813E MEASURE -2.25 TO INVERT 4AA� ` FINISH GRADE ?00- ADEQUATE DEPTH TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO PIPE �� . �P� RUNOFF to n eta ci nac FROM SITE 49'-0" 18" INSIDE DIA. 18" INSIDE DIA DETENTION PIPE LENGTH 11 CORRELATED POLYETHYLENE RETENTION PIPE CATEGORY I SMALL SITE PROJECTS CROSS-SECTION OF TYPICAL DETENTION SYSTEM NOT TO SCALE -APPROXIMATE TOPOGRAPHY ,\QV,` AT 2' CONTOURS \EXSTING APPX. 14" CEDAR GO C.O. 4"/6" CLEAN 149,08' APPX.rY P. = . r ' • AT SLOPE •�a%b >llli Sfop� for ss \ SIDE SEWER TO HAVE lr� 00 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM EXISTING WATER LINE FIELD VERIFY. IF LESS THAN 18", PROVIDE 20' PVC SLEEVE p� FOR WATER LINE CENTERED ON INTERSECTION. SEWER LINE TO I 0 BE INSTALLED BELOW WATER LINE. W EXISTING WATER LINE I W\ WATER METER w N3 cn I APPEXISTING `(' I CEDAR t = `" o� I o 148,93'1411 z EXISTING WOOD FENCE RESURFACE 1,031 S.F o EXISTING DRIVEWAY SHEET FLOW TO LAWN C( VIA 2% CROSS SLOPE RETAIN EXISTING PAVING DURING GARAGE CONSTRUCTION OR PROVIDE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OF 8" DEEP 2-4" QUARRY SPALLS AS INDICATED Qea. C 611- Ir 36*%dO 151,77' REFERENCE ELEVATION 'fit •2. BURY ELECTRICAL LINE TO GARAGE DOUGLAS FIR TREES TO REMAIN - PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE DURING CONSTRUCTION ORM OrL GYL��Ter, 4 W DROP TYPE a C17- SMALL SITE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 41 \ ` STORMWATER SITE PLAN LOCATE UTILITIES AND CALL BEFORE EXCAVATING: 1-800-424-5555 NORTH C1-rIl- 01 A *1 / Ct/N=M111 A TCtn C1t>- =I A AI FISHER DETACHED GARAGE 16900 ILTH AVE W. EDMONDS, WA 98024 PARCEL: 21040100101000 GRADING CALCULATIONS: CUT EAST HALF OF BUILDING 901 S.F. X 0.5' = 454 CF = 11 CY EAST DRIVEWAY 1120 SF X 1.5' = 180 CF = ICY FOOTINGS 141 LF X 1.0' X 2.5' = 403 CF = 15 C• TOTAL CUT = 39 CY FILL WEST HALF OF BUILDING 910 S.F. X .5' = 455 CF = 11 CY TOTAL FILL = 11 CY WATER & SEWER INSPECTIONS READ C-ALL425-771-0220 W.1228 ALL E.XP�XSEED SUEFACES TO BE COVERED WITHiN 2 DK3 6 I 7 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES I. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO 2009 I.R.C.. CITY OF EDMONDS, AND OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. 3. PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES TO REMAIN 4. THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND DETERMINE ACTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ASSOCIATED WORK. S. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION RELATING TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES. L. ALL REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING ELEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TRUE AND PLUMB, WITH SEAMLESS TRANSITION TO EXISTING FINISHES. 1. ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. 8. FURNISH ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AS SELECTED BY OWNER. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SWITCHES AND RECEPTACLES WITH OWNER. LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE TO BE VERIFIED. 9. PROVIDE FINISH MATERIAL, FIXTURES, AND OTHER AESTHETIC ELEMENTS IN COLOR, TEXTURE, AND STYLE OF OWNERS CHOOSING. 10. ALL WORK TO MEET OR EXCEED STANDARD BUILDING CONVENTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. II. PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT ALL FIXTURE, CASEWORK, AND OTHER PROJECT COMPONENTS REQUIRING ATTACHMENT TO THE STRUCTURE. 12. SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS IISEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. COORDINATE WITH REMAINING PROJECT ELEMENTS. SPECIFICATIONS WINDOWS: FIBERGLAS OR VINYL PER OWNER U-VALUE OF 0.35 MAX. DOORS: EXTERIOR DOOR TO HAVE U-VALUE OF 0.20 MAXIMUM LIGHTING: AT LEAST 50% OF LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE HIGH EFFICIENCY TYPE SUCH AS COMPACT FLOURESCENT OR L.! D. SIDING: VERTICAL CEDAR TO MATCH EXISTING DRYWALL: INSTALL DRYWALL WITH SCREWS TO AVOID NAIL POPS, AND TAPE AND MUD TO A SMOOTH, UNIFORM APPEARANCE. INSTALL DRYWALL AND JOINT FINISHES PER MANUFACTURER S RECOMMENDATIONS. PROVIDE METAL CORNER BEADS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. APPLY WALL TEXTURE FINISH TO WALLS IN AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. FINISH TO BE FREE OF STARVED SPOTS AND UNIFORM IN APPEARANCE. APPLY PER MANUFACTURER S INSTRUCTIONS. PROVIDE WATER RESISTANT DRYWALL AT PLUMBING WALLS. PAINT AND STAIN: MANUFACTURER TO BE PARKER PAINT OR EQUAL. PREPARE SURFACES TO BE PAINTED OR STAINED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. PRIME ALL UNFINISHED WOOD TO BE PAINTED PRIOR TO APPLYING FINISH COAT. USE PRIMER AND FINISH PRODUCT RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER FOR EACH SUBSTRATE TO BE PAINTED. APPLY TWO FINISH COATS 01: PAINT. PROVIDE PAINT AND STAINS IN COLORS OF OWNER S CHOOSING. SEAL ALL STAINED SURFACES WITH VARATHANE OR EQUAL. FIXTURES: PROVIDE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AS SELECTED BY OWNER. FIXTURES AND CONTROLS SHOWN ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. LOCATE FIXTURES AND CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY OWNER, AND TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CODES. ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH CONCEALED FASTENERS. COLOR AND SPACING TO MATCH EXISTING. ROOF UNDERLAYMENT INSTALL IN GRID PATTERN OF 12 INCHES BETWEEN SIDE LAPS WITH 6 INCH SPACING AT THE SIDE LAPS. ALL LAPS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4". ATTACH USING METAL OR PLASTIC CAP NAILS WITH A HEAD DIAMETER OF NOT LESS THAN I" WITH A THICKNESS OF AT LEAST 32 GA SHEET METAL. THE CAP -NAIL SHANK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12GA WITH A LENGTH TO PENETRATE THROUGH THE ROOF SHEATHING OR A MINIMUM OF 3/4" INTO THE SHEATHING. NOTE If the proposed height of a building (as shown on the plans) Is within 12 Inches of the maximum height permitted for the zone an elevation survey 1s required. An elevation curveg consists of three coin onents, to be conducted bg a licensed surveyor: o tr1or to construction the surveyor shall establish average ggrade as specified In ECDC 21.40.030. and shall establish a reference datum pant that well be undisturbed and can be freely accessed. o The surveyor shall locate the elevation of the first floor prior to the C1tg under -floor Inspection. o A final letter of height confirmation shall be provided upon completion of the structur �/UUIiJ{�E�U(ciJi�i^SI'douiri.E+7 raIS �FIL{_:'i`3111��f Ir�i���16�LFO 1 ACCEPTABLE TIT.. R MATERIAL ACH 40 .12 F510 14A C 0 PROJECT INFORMATION FISHER DETACHED GARAGE 14900 16TH AVE W. EDMONDS, WA 98026 PARCEL: 21040100101000 ZONE: RS12 SITE AREA: 0.19 AC/34,412.4 S.F. EXISTING RESIDENCE: 1,419 S.F. MAIN FLOOR 110 S.F. BASEMENT 2,129 S.F. TOTAL LIVING AREA EXISTING GARAGE: 440 S.F. PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE: 1,464 S.F. BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: VICINITY MAP NORTH NOT TO SCALE Zone 0 Corner„ TF1a9 t Setbacks Actual Front _ -Ll -... Sides► IS s-- Rear Z �� Other HeiWit are A p OVED BLANI�I�1C=sLD W CIO 0 M r a � a +c En wac a 3 W 0 =� w r (!) U >y m �Z Z ") 00 E CC)J_ a- OCOO - O w ¢ LO M -) U ¢ oo t cc W 1- _17 0 Ns Z = N v lJJ U o) _ (D-17 -_ cc m 0 0 .Q ") C7 LW 0 0 0 0 0 0 r` 0 0 r` N 0 Z I. J w U ¢ Z a O co Q N Q 00 CD O Ul U_ Wo z !� o 0 �C W U LLI /Q > V ¢ ti W0 Z to Q Cii 1n LL of w w 0 F � a _ F, U V J U Q �++ LUJ o W a a � DATE: 6-21-13 REVISED: 9-30-2013 10-II-2013 RESUB /%y�, �. OCT 16 2013 13UILDING DEPARUMENT CITY OF EDMONDS i3- 9 I wr ELMMEWON LEGAL DESCRIPTION KING STORMUJATER SMALL SITE REQUIREMENTS SMALL SITE CATEGORY I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 11,2 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHP SILT PENCE OR STRAW BALES BHP wnTIRE WASH AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OR RIP RAP IF DRIVEWAY IS BEING REPLACED MINIMUM REQUIREMENT Fi PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS T MAINTAIN EXISTING SHEET FLOW TO DOWN SLOPE T LAWN AREAS ON REPLACED DRIVEWAY MNI'NM REQUIREMENT $1 FLOW CONTROL TIGNTLINE IMPERVIOUS ROOF AREA TO CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM. MINIMUM REQUIREMENT $4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TO BE DETERMINED TYPE AREA NON REGULATED REGULATED LINE 1 PRE PM ROOF AREA: 2.935 S.F. NON REGULATED PREWERR DRIVEWAY 91 S.F. A� SID5524 S.P. LINE 2 REPLACED EXEMPT PRE FM DRIVEWAY: L031 SP LINE 3 NEW (POST 19TD L86 S.F. 391 SF LINE 4 2= SP. LINE 5 TOTAL AREA MITIGATED BY EXISTING STORMWATER SYSTEMS 0 S.F. LINE L REGULATED AREA NOT YET MITIGATED 222 S.P. LINE 1 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT 391 S.F. LINE 8 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY CONVENTIONAL SUM L815 SF. EDMONDS STOORR„1gATER SUPPLEMENT 23 dPsdmd m C�tar 1110. SO ECDJG la urta Im replena mparwmo ewfam m-kuW (Iootpr wxI mpervwaown d eata wl don not dwgc hw. rot a atwrtad fowdaum). aW rot be a dared rammed rwfam fa uw pwpa d tin dobfar md= the protect ate hm I we a we" d lad-daiwbmg eeuvrtxa OS IN. BELOW HIGH POINT INSIDE DETENTION PIPE RIM ELEVATION OVERFLOW PIPE - EITHER 8 IN. DIA. LOCKING LID OR NO IN. DIAMETER SEE NOTES UNDER TABLE I PM 14 GRADE V MIN. MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE BOX OR RISER TO APPROVED I COLLECTION POINT N PIPE ORIFICE SIZE PER TABLE L EDMONDS STORMWATER SUPPLEMENT IE DETAIL OF CONTROL CATCH BASIN A� NOT TO SCALE AT a REFERENCE ELEVATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION y SEC O'I TWP 21 RGE 04BEG AT EV4 COR OF SEC 1 TH NON 45E L02.21FT TH NLK33 IOW 2250FT TO WLY „GIN MEADOWDALB RD TH ,�. NOIeW 45E 13231PT TPB TH Nl8ei8 22W 169.29PT TH N09t04 42W 52J35P'T TH N2Le1804W SO.90PT TH N23H0 ALE 13U9NT TH N24a01 380�Itp 1� ALG WL"Y4„GIN3MEADOUB)A"LS Rp50?bl 2p.8g T TH L' \ 1 8' EXISTING - --- CLEAN OUT PARCEL 21040100101100 OWNED BY CITY OF LYNWOOD WITHIN CITY OF EDMONDS 4 rR',�`. O \ I 1a I \ D' EXISTING SEWER LINE \ I \ r l ,, \ 4- \` \ WALKIII APPROXIMATE TOPOGRAPHY \ AT y CONTOURS MLKKA ALWIYS \ \ TING, G \ (RAGE I \ 1 PROPOSED SEWER LIKE I CFFRAOMM GDDETACHED .$"—PROPOSED WATER LINE Ier INSIDE DIA =� CORRELATED POLYETHYLENE RETENTION PIPE L' PVC TIGHTUNE TO CRY STORM SYSTEM 4' DROP STORMWATER WATER LINE w W VIA I CR rIC I tR b 9 0 z WOOD FENCE RESURFACE L031 SP EXISTING DRIVEWAY SHEET FLOW TO LAWN VIA 2% CROSS SLOPE RIP RAP DURING CONSTRUCTION I TOOURGEM� PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND CRITICAL ROOT TYPE LL ZONE DURING CONSTRUCTION i AVERAGE LEVEL MARK REFERENCE ELEVATION A 15.47 B 15.0' I C 15.01 A 15.0' AVERAGE LEVEL - 15.0' a FINISH GRADE ADEQUATE DEPTH TO \" 1 PREVENT DAMAGE TO PIPE 'Y?IL c 0SOM TO 0.15% SLOPE FROM TO APPROVED COLLECTION FONT SMALL SITE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IN STORMWATER SITE PLAN DETENTION PIPEENG LENGTH LOCATE UTIUTIES AND CONTROL CALL BEFORE EXCAVATING: CATCH BASIN F800-4211 5 NORTH®SITE PLAN/ STORNWATER SITE PLAN CATEGORY I SMALL SITE PROJECTS r n 20 -0' CROSS-SECTION OF TYPICAL RSHER DETACHED GARAGE DETENTION SYSTEM IL900 H AVE U. EDMONDS (K)DETENTION MA 9802L NOT TO SCALE PARCEL: 21040100101000 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES L CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED ACCORDING TO 2009 LR.G_ CITY OF EDMONDS. AND OTHER APPLICABLE CODES. 3. PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES TO REMAIN 4. THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND DETERMINE ACTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ASSOCIATED WORK. S. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION RELATING TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES. L. ALL REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING ELEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TRUE AND PLUMB, WITH SEAMLESS TRANSITION TO EXISTING FINISHES. 'L ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. 8. FURNISH ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AS SELECTED BY OWNER. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SWITCHES AND RECEPTACLES WITH OWNER LOCATIONS SHOWM ARE TO BE VERIFIED. I. -PROVIDE FINISH MATERIAL, FIXTURES, AND OTHER AESTHETIC ELEMENTS IN COLOR. TEXTURE, AND STYLE OP OWNERS CHOOSING. IO.ALL WORK TO MEET OR EXCEED STANDARD BUILDING CONVENTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. IL PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT ALL FIXTURE, CASEWORK AND OTHER PROJECT COMPONENTS REQUIRING ATTACHMENT TO THE STRUCTURE G. SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS M.SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. COORDINATE WITH REMAIUNG PROJECT ELEMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS WINDOWS: FIBERGLAS OR VINYL PER OWNER U-VALUE OF 035 MAX. DOORS: EXTERIOR DOOR TO HAVE U-VALUE OF 0.20 MAXIMUM LIGHTING: AT LEAST 50% OF LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE HIGH EFFICIENCY TYPE SUCH AS COMPACT FLOURESCENT OR L.I.D. SIDING: VERTICAL CEDAR TO MATCH EXISTING DRYWALL: INSTALL DRYWALL WITH SCREWS TO AVOID NAIL POPS. AND TAPE AND MUD TO A SMOOTH, UNIFORM APPEARANCE. INSTALL DRYWALL AND JOINT FINISHES PER MANUFACTURER 5 RECOMMENDATIONS. PROVIDE METAL CORNER BEADS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. APPLY WALL TEXTURE FINISH TO WALLS IN AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. FINISH TO BE FREE OF STARVED SPOTS AND UNIFORM IN APPEARANCE APPLY PER MANUFACTURER S INSTRUCTIONS. PROVIDE WATER RESISTANT DRYWALL AT PLUMBING WALLS. . PANT AND STAN MANUFACTURER TO BE PARKER PAINT OR EQUAL PREPARE SURFACES TO BE PAINTED OR STAMED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS- PRIME ALL UNFINISHED WOOD TO BE PANTED PRIOR TO APPLYING FLUSH COAT. USE PRMER AND FINISH PRODUCT RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER FOR EACH SUBSTRATE TO BE PAINTED. APPLY TWO FINISH COATS OF PAINT. PROVIDE PAINT AND STAINS IN COLORS OF OWNER 5 CHOOSING. VARATWAMEORL ALL STAINED ED SURPACES WIT PROVIDE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AS SELECTED BY OWNER FIXTURES AND CONTROLS SHOWN ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. LOCATE FIXTURES AND CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AND TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CODES. ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH CONCEALED FASTENERS. COLOR AND SPACING TO MATCH EXISTING. ROOP UNDERLAYMENT INSTALL IN GRID PATTERN OF Q INCHES BETWEEN SIDE LAPS WITH L INCH SPACING AT THE SIDE LAPS. ALL LAPS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4'. ATTACH USING METAL OR PLASTIC CAP NAILS WITH A HEAD DIAMETER OP NOT LESS THAN r WITH A THICKNESS OF AT LEAST 32 GA SHEET METAL THE CAP -NAIL SHANK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF DGA WITH A LENGTH TO PENETRATE THROUGH THE ROOF SHEATHING OR A MINIMUM OF 3/4' INTO THE SHEATHING. Zone Corner 0 Flab Setbacks Actual Front _Required 319 Sides o __ . _3 �-0 Rear _ 2- 2`3 Other Hfivht PROJECT INFORMATION FISHER DETACHED GARAGE 16900 lLTH AVE W. EDMOINDS, WA 98021 PARCEL• 21040100,01000 ZONE R812 SITE AREA: 0.14 AC/34AM4 S.P. EXISTING RESIDENCE L4M S.P. MAIN FLOOR TO U. BASEMENT 2.124 S.P. TOTAL LIVING AREA EXISTING GARAGE: 440 S.P. PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE: W4 S.P. BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 3= S.F. BUILDING AREA/34.40 S.F. LOT COVERAGE a U% PROJECT DESCRIPTION WWIITTHSVVEWCLE ACCESS FROM EXISTINGG DDRIVEWRAY E INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DESCRIPTION NUMBER Al SITE PLAN AND PROJECT INFORMATION A2 FOUNDATION PLAN, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN AS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, BUILDING SECTION A4 DETAILS SLO STRUCTURAL NOTES 82J STRUCTURAL DETAILS ABBREVIATIONS BA. BATH CS CATCH BASIN CLO. CLOSET EX. EXISTING EXIST. EXISTING P.Y. FIELD VERIFY INV, INVERT ELEVATION UN. LINEN PAN. PANTRY PERP PERFORATED R.O. ROUGH OPENING �. TYPICAL UN.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VICINITY MAP NORTH® NOT TO SCALE RECEIVE® JUN 2 7 2013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COUNTER Z ZI d li U � 3 m LLA LlJ I-- Z = N Lu U a wAl City of Edmonds Critical Area Notice of Decision .Applicant: o�r s � Property Owner: ��e S ✓ Critical Area File #: C�a `�� 7 Permit Number: Q a013 0 6 Site Location: 10 0© 0 �- Parcel Number: 970 Y070 0/0 / 00 0 Project Description: conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above 1. ✓ There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. 2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. .3.. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. ❑ Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. ❑ Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160: 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare i on or off the development proposal site; 3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. The proposal protects the. critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and ;4 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of _ noncompliance. Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. ❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. 1 See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). 1< Q-, Reviewer 'gnature Date Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. Revised 1211612010 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AP OVER PLA KING -- - - - - - - - -- G - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L STORMWATER SMALL SITE REQUIREMENTS SMALL SITE CATEGORY I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 22 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION ++�• SHP BILT FENCE OR STRAW BALES BMP TIRE WASH AT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE OR RIP RAP IF DRIVEWAY IN BEING REPLACED MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 94 PRESERVATION OF NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS T MAINTAIN EXISTING SHEET FLOW TO DOWN SLOPE T LAWN AREAS ON REPLACED DRIVEWAY MNS4UM REQUIREMENT 81 FLOW CONTROL TIGHTLINE IMPERVIOUS ROOF AREA TO CITY STORMWATER SYSTEM. MIN11710 REQUIREMENT a9 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE TO BE DETERMINED TYPE AREA NON REGULATED REGULATED LINE I PRE 1911 ROOF AREA: 1435 SP. NON REGULATED PRE 191'1 LOWER DRIVEWAY 2,541 S.F. AND SIDEWALKS 5526 S.F. LINE 2 REPLACED EXEMPT PRE Fill DRIVEWAY: L031 SP LINE 3 NEW (POST A*n) L815 &F. 341 SF - LIVE 4 Z22 S.P. LINE 5 TOTAL AREA MITIGATED BY EXISTING STORMWATER SYSTEMS 0 S.F. LINE L REGULATED AREA NOT YET MITIGATED 2.22 S.F. LINE 1 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT 311 S.P. LINE 8 AREA PROPOSED TO BE MITIGATED BY CONVENTIONAL SWM LOS S.F. EDMONDS STORMWATER SUPPLEMENT 23 Fa r:tn ath fmdp dae)bv veto, (as defined m CFapta 2L90 80 ECDC) a prop- that Pdelp replecn mpemme wrfarn m-w (footprint end aperwavvw d mmand does not dchovWp,e but rat a Kruatael toadeUww) dwd not 6e c diareed r mpffv w evfam IN the papa of the tW r-ject Me has I aae a Srom- d 05 IN. BELOW HIGH POINT INSIDE DETENTION PIPE RIM ELEVATION OVERFLOW PIPE - EITHER 8 IN. DIA.� LOCKNG LID N OR 10 . DIAMETER SEE NOTES UNDER TABLE I c FINISH GRADE L' MIN. MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE CONCRETE BOX OR RISER TO APPROVED I COLLECTION POINT PIPE ORIFICE SIZE PER TABLE L EDMONDS STORMWATER SUPPLEMENT iE DETAIL OF CONTROL CATCH BASIN A� NOT TO SCALE a REFERENCE ELEVATION i \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION • 4T I 7 SEC 01 TWP 21 RGE O—W AT EV4 COR OF SEC 1 TH NOISE 45E \ 4, 60211FT TH NLIS33 IOW 2Z5OFT TO WLY MGM MEADOWDALE RD TH ROIN 4SE 13231" TPS TH N18t18 22W 1512IFT TH N09SO4 42W \ 52.85FT TH M20180401 SOAOFT TH N23S40 40 23J9PT TH N24S01 \ SOIS8 ALG R6BUI20T T TH L' 46W WLLYY4MGM MMEADOWDALE i AT \ ICY - \ IY EXISTING \ SEWER LINE I \4, EXISTING - - CLEAN OUT \ \ r^ i 04 SP \\ WALKW \ % 14, \ APPROXIMATE TOPOGRAPHY \ AT 2' CONTOURS fr \ PAS G r' NCR ' OF ` TING ` G RAGE \ 8` i T ' \ \ EXISTING WATER LINE IS G rr AIMIN WALL \I DRAIN4 ( 18' gM34 E AND $O SEWER LINE / FROM DETACHED I k, GARAGE WALKWAYS PROPOSED Ty6/ WATER LINEWATER I EXISTING W WATER METER I! APRON FLOIS a O T TO LAWN I P z V I EXISTING WOOD FENCE S oY geW� 4ia % •� RESURFACE L031 S.P EXISTING DRIVEWAY r f • j.-. - SHEET FLOW TO LAWN VIA 2% CROSS SLOPE RIP RAP PROPOSED GARAGE �� r .: I +/ DURING CONSTRUCTION p1 i L515 SP ROOF AREA S CS TYPE IL_`-�� r 7 32L SF DRIVEWAY SHEET FLOW Is S V ' I NV „O,DS .Cyr`4'\ V TO LAWN AND NATIVE LANDSCAPING T (8' 22' E B I j BOO'$ DOUGLAS FIR TREES „;x_. I 3' DROP TSX 2S-O' TO REMAIN - PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION P j OW p CRITICAL ROOT CS TYPE L IV INSIDE DIA ZONE DURING CONSTRUCTION PARCEL 21040100IOTi00 INV - j CORREGATED OWNED BY CITY OF LYNWOOD POLYETHYLENEDS WITHIN CRY OF EDMON / RETENTION PIPE AVERAGE LEVEL j MARK REFERENCE ELEVATION p D TT M TgCY5Q 'j*. SYSTEM ,S B 6.d f 0 O �.\ A 15.0' AVERAGE LEVEL • 5.47 EXISTING CRY STORMWATER t CATCH BASIN INV a b a 82-rr t FINISH GRADE ADEQUATE DEPTH TO 4A, i PREVENT DAMAGE TO PIPE RUNOFF 0.501 TO 0.15% SLOPE FROM SITE TO APPROVED SMALL SITE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT II COLLECTION FONT I STORMWATER SITE PLAN I` V CONTROL DETENTION PIPE LENGTH �� CALLLL TE UTILITIES AND BEFORE EXCAVATING: , CATCH BASIN i I-BOO-4244555 NORTH SITE PLAN/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN CATEGORY I SMALL SITE PROJECTS -Pr-- 21-0' CROSS-SECTION OF TYPICAL FISHER DETACHED GARAGE W IE DETENTION SYSTEM EDMO AVE W. E00 1AT LTF1 WA W. NOT TO SCALE PARCEL- 2WI0100101000 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES L CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGMG CONSTRUCTION. 2. IXITYWOF EDMONDS,, AND OTHHEERAPPLICABLE CODES. IRO. 3. PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF TREES TO REMAIN 4. THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND DETERMINE ACTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ASSOCIATED WORK. S. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT AMD ENGINEER FOR DIRECTION RELATING TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES. L ALL REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING ELEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TRUE AND PLUMB, WITH SEAMLESS TRANSITION TO EXISTING FINISHES. 1. ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS, S. FURNISH ELECTRICAL FIXTURES A8 SELECTED BY OWNER. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF SWITCHES AND RECEPTACLES WITH OWNER. LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE TO BE VERIFIED. 9. PROVIDE FINISH MATERIAL FIXTURES, AND OTHER - AESTHETIC ELEMENTS -IN COLOR, TEXTURE, -AND -STYLE OF - OWNERS CHOOSING. IO.ALL WORK TO MEET OR EXCEED STANDARD BUILDING CONVENTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. S. PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT ALL FIXTURE. CASEWORK AND OTHER PROJECT COMPONENTS REQUIRING ATTACHMENT TO THE STRUCTURE EL SEE STRUCTURAL NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS IS.SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. COORDINATE WITH REMAINING PROJECT ELEMENTS. SPECIFICATIONS WINDOWS: RBERGLAS OR VINYL PER OWNER U-VALUE OF 035 MAX. DOORS: EXTERIOR DOOR TO HAVE U-VALUE OF 0.20 MAXIMUM LIGHTING: AT LEAST 50% OF LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE HIGH EFFICIENCY TYPE SUCH AS COMPACT FLOURESCENT OR L.I.D. SIDING: VERTICAL CEDAR TO MATCH EXISTING DRYWALL: INSTALL DRYWALL WITH SCREWS TO AVOID NAIL POPS, AND TAPE AND MUD TO A SMOOTH. UNIFORM APPEARANCE. INSTALL DRYWALL AND JOINT FINISHES PER MANUFACTURER S RECOMMENDATIONS. PROVIDE METAL CORNER BEADS AT ALL OUTSIDE CORNERS. APPLY WALL TEXTURE FINISH TO WALLS IN AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. FINISH TO BE FREE OF STARVED SPOTS AND UNIFORM IN APPEARANCE APPLY PER MANUFACTURER S INSTRUCTIONS. PROVIDE WATER RESISTANT DRYWALL AT PLUMBING WALLS. PANT AND STAIN: MANUFACTURER TO BE PARKER PANT OR EQUAL PREPARE SURFACES TO BE PAINTED OR STAINED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. PRIME ALL UNFINISHED WOOD TO BE PAINTED PRIOR TO APPLYING FINISH COAT. USE PRIMER AND FINISH PRODUCT RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER FOR EACH SUBSTRATE TO BE PAINTED. APPLY TWO FINISH COATS OF PAINT. PROVIDE PANT AND STAINS IN COLORS OF OWNER S CHOOSING. SEAL ALL STAINED SURFACES WITH VARATHANE OR EQUAL FIXTURES: PROVIDE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL FIXTURES AS SELECTED BY OWNER. FIXTURES AND CONTROLS SHOWN ARE SCHEMATIC ONLY. LOCATE FIXTURES AND CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY OWNER AND TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CODES. ROOF STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH CONCEALED FASTENERS. COLOR AND SPACING TO MATCH EXISTING. ROOF UNDERLAYMENT INSTALL IN GRID PATTERN OF 12 INCHES BETWEEN SIDE LAPS WITH L INCH SPACING AT THE SIDE LAPS. ALL LAPS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 4'. ATTACH USING METAL OR PLASTIC CAP NAILS WITH A HEAD DIAMETER OF NOT LESS THAN P WITH A THICKNESS OF AT LEAST 32 GA SHEET METAL THE CAP -NAIL SHANK SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12GA WITH A LENGTH TO PENETRATE THROUGH THE ROOF SHEATHING OR A MINIMUM OF 3/4' INTO THE SHEATHING. Zone Corner 0 Flag N Setbacks Required Actual Front 3 Sides P►Z, 10 v 0 __ -3 b-0 Rear — �_57_ 2cg Other Height _15 z PROJECT INFORMATION FISHER DETACHED GARAGE 16900 14TH AVE W. EDMONDS. WA 9806 PARCEL- 21040100101000 ZONE R512 SITE AREA: 0.19 AC/34AM4 S.P. EXISTING RESIDENCE L419 S.P. MAIN FLOOR 110 S.P. BASEMENT 2.129 S.P. TOTAL LIVING AREA EXISTING GARAGE: 440 S.F. PROPOSED DETACHED GARAGE L444 S.P. BWLDNG LOT COVERAGE 3d23 S.F. BUILDING AREA/34.4D S.F. LOT COVERAGE - 9.6% PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION OF A 1.444 SP. DETACHED GARAGE WITH VEHICLE ACCESS FROM EXISTING DRIVEWAY. INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DESCRIPTION NUMBER Al SITE PLAN AND PROJECT INFORMATION A2 FOUNDATION PLAN, FLOOR PLAN. ROOF PLAN AS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, BUILDING SECTION A4 DETAILS SLO STRUCTURAL NOTES 821 STRUCTURAL DETAILS ABBREVIATIONS BA. BATH CB CATCH BASIN CLO. CLOSET EX. EXISTING EXIST. EXISTING F.Y. FIELD VERIFY INV. INVERT ELEVATION UN. LINEN PAN. PANTRY PERF PERFORATED R.O. ROUGH OPENING TYP. TYPICAL U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VICINITY MAP NORTH NOT TO SCALE Ing rl ECEivE® JUN 2 7 2013 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ;���✓z-�,o.,ci�! COUNTER I Z� 1 U Q3m_ W ► Z : N _ = m (=< 0 6 5 y1P, ­7 p: SECTION CORNER A n o7•00•00• Q �Q3 7 .1 e oL 583.33' ", A�,0 • NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 EXISTING ENCASED I -I n N. LINE OF GOV. LO'L 2' O� / ---W7.37'(CALC) S38.90•(DESCR)-- T.27N.. R4E.. W.M. NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 z 3 88' T.27N.. R.4E.. �J.t 1✓" - ••% •• I -- -------- T.27N.. R.4E. W.M. CO sCRETE MEORNUMENT _ N89'03'OS1Y 24T.96' N89.03.05�W / 210.CKY ••-ti.• - T42.96' L- - N89'03'OS'W _ _ _ 367._ TEE LANDS rZ? a TO9 *91r - • $ / 1' i I F _ e - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - ' - - ^ w �"' S8T.02• \ l _ _ Ni9'03'05'VI 244.31 • - - -i 1 A 8 B A - 00 31 21 • __ _ • - • •� �v- �• ' - - - - - - (PER HNNES POINT PLAT AS RECORDED R - 4724.6W _ _/ G • _ 7' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT - SOUTH LINE OF HAINES POINT PIAI� � � ,�! S1 VOL 47. PG. 108. RECORDS OF / 7' •/1401040099 B SNOHOM 12 COUNtt, WASHINGTON I l - CLOW - -' - I \ ?• AFN 8811255032) �• •/ 8'ti� Wit,-�r•,b - ' . • --''' • - �� I j� � � Sf0 sr� J I � I+ r / ^4, _-/' - COWF3YNENT MEANDER LINE .f53020 02 EA ►TENT- - - - - Or - - - - - \� - - - p� 0209 ss•-LYN�tlAi000 SE)NAGE' AFFI 8302080277- ,�pp 4824 66titi IREO �1ENT PW �j \ ` O O I � L 782.33' _ -'''�•.1 _ (�, '� r`'"' .'' •.�. SNi9'D3'05'E Ji 0 � : . .. ti .� »» :... t.'r ? •.. 29 65• \ jc / O�'1r �•-- z -� .._ TAX PARCEL 270407001058DO NBWO3•o51Y _--- _ SEXISIM ENCASED N11WO3' V- ' - N89.03'o5'W IS89,0345.56' \ \ •� I I CONCRETE MONUMENT 119:3$' -,• .\ - 0.08' WEST OF 316.00' ,. \ \ - \�� .\ 23.04' 1 SECTION LINE 'f`'\ HNNSOUTERW S POINT PLATE EXISTING ENCASED �� ��2t•' •Fg ��' �` / ao a,-/ \ t y CONCRETE MONUMENT 01.35.3Y S• js__----a �- . - 1 B ` I 0.04' WEST OF •^ 4i / R - 4824.65' " " , \ \ \ ?� ?,• I SECTION LINE L 134.20' 7'�/k _ •::! -»s!. - •� Ja 4i A 45.05'58•---\� .n• : ?r / . / /;•:;..i ..:... .. •o Oo R 150.00• P.C.C. �'• �,, L - 118.07' /--- S1332'10"W �B E` AK: 704D7001 \ 1] / $• - , ---- 339.8E t-- - -- ----�� _ I A - 3T41'43' to \ I p I '" �' / ( " I • • _ t • • • _ 6.85' V ' R - 190.00' •ei. yr 312.58' \ .11'• -T434_• 146.46'(CALC) 146.80'(DESCR) ' L - 125.00' rpm .93' " / ---- SWOT05 E / 768.22• CN.0 \\ /-. ' .� 198.17' •. r � INK F ' - 1332'10•E 10.92' ( I I lEXISTING ENCASED / ( )---- \ CHAIN LINK FENCE 5133210'W ' ` �CON(xRETE MONUMENT / - ENCROACHES 2.6' -__-- '/ .-,� ••-. _ _ SOUTH OF PROPERTY 4.� RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LME / - - - ^� LINE A 2253.40• �t ' :^• ♦ •, �«•• :»• wy I , - / R - 170.00• 1 A - 2253'40' / A 09'55'00' / o - _ to, c - r µ. t L 67.93• - �- R 130.00' j i 991 675E a » s (• • .» -s ( L 51.95' p^ ,�^ g g� / , \ mW - •- r-7M-PARca-27040700105700 p1-1'4 1 ,u a a h ryp f `'off a3 O N89'03_IrS1V N89'03'Q61,Y ,�i z z » ..8 S•It341'O0ti 42R4' 20Q.i 22.45' I 1 ? 2h (� LEGEND a _ _ .. ,- ��♦ y 23 9" ! O +�•�N Z a� SECTION CORNER '. = o` - - - op ♦ y Aa0 QUARTER CORNER { o '�7AY.RARC6k�IN'4(1700f01800 .. b3'`��`A�� ; '-�-7' 1 O EXISTING MONUMENT a - J :♦ "� c O = O ��fV 3' BRASS OM IN CONC. I i A 1•Q2'0338• ♦ y� ♦ N N78'18" 1M 5,I^ ^ W ENCROACHMENT 10.6• REBAR CAP. %7892 , Q \ \ DETAIL / _-__„�,_• FENCE LINE N8903'05•W • • _ • • - L 311 �6p• ` • • -� - `'' ,1�? 20:342' c ( N ' J SCALE 1' - 30' ° / y J - R �1r N84 54'S2'E R 159. �J / Q SET REBAR & CAP. , 260.41'(C$C}-f4934�DE5CR)" - \✓/ -_ z9 > /17872. FEB 2002 1 - P.O.B. . i I PARCELS -0.- E & F CURRENT CRY OF REFERENCE: _- LYNNWOOD LIMITS 1 1 1 Q O i ® SET PK NAIL & WASHER RECORD OF SURVEY FILED UNDER - A - 36'Y8:02• (TYPICAL) i w _ #17672. FEB 2002 RECORDING NO. 8912285001 . R - 120.00• - 7���.[� I j SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE - - - - - _ MONUMENT E _ :» _ r - v�/j�j/_� ��`N$_I I 1 O /37327, DEC Toot 'NOTE SURVEY MAP CREATED uslNc MFORwTNON a 38'31.4D' • � 7" `�0�. I'0 O1 n THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER FROM REFERENCE SURVEY AND DOCUMENTS THAT � - 53 •-_.•- MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY DEEMED PARCELS C. 0. E AND F. N61'33'101W BASIS OF BEARINGS: PLAT OF HAMLS POINT J! •. I / 22.5W RECORDNGACT, AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD AS RECORDED ISI VOO� COUNTAGEWA�MGTON SCALE IN FEET --L p D ...-T86,SJ 0 -. �Q j ! P.O.B. F THIS 4.o DAY OF,20p,;, THE BEARING OF THE EAST LINE OF THE NE }) - • • 1/4 OF SECTION 7. T.27N.. R4E. W.M. I - 50 0 60 120 501.11'451N e IS NOT71'4S"E 44•99' �1141AIIIX ;aA1&QQiD L.S. No. 37527 THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE STANDARn - ! ! 44.994.99 t'45�N RW,LqTM LAND SURVeft SET FORTH IN RCW 58.09 AND WAC 332.130 RECORD OF SURVEY FOR P. .... CITY OF LYNNWOOD I CITY LIMITS RECORDING CEfMFICATE A.F.NO.;i R .� r-f FILED FOR RECORD BY JFRF[Y J. FRANKUN THIS OFti,LY1�B! W4�7� r IN GON'T LOT 2 •IN THE NE 1/4, SECTION 7, T.27N., R.4E., W.M.- 20 AD., AT MINUTES PAST�O;CLOCK�.M., AND RECORDED IN VOLUME " �' a :'x ,�� CITY OF LYNNW000, SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON f I OF SURVEYS ON PAGE - RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. 2906 Colby Avenue -I WASHMGTON . 727 �f 'AIL L►Tf0 ao[ v Taoabsv_ . m 4m PA-mw A -AD1 E2CilLll lGC�. /�Y 3�K.Jl` O6� aa, e I ou owi av� w not a� rwc iu �a 2 - pip EAST 1 /4 CO ER .7 ' -8- • . _ - _ • • - COUNTY AUDITOR AUDITOR o� aLe of Z2:p3�-04p AWp I 12-07-01 JJF X 1- - 60' sm 1 ar 2 REVISED 01-20-03 S:\DRAWINGS\22\02\060�2260-ROS.DW6' -" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.eov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION '�7c. 189., Critical Areas Reconnaissance Report RA.: zM 00 u Crrtrcal_Areas File "Number_1 p> C 2012 76 ' ;$, _.., _ _ Determination Study Required rte�Coca_tionx... Tax Account Number 27040700101000 3 P.roperty Owner t Steven FSsheca Applicant �F3t Some Crrtrcal-Areas`Pr'esent r ' 0 Geologically Hazardous Areas ' 1 y Q Erosion Hazard Areas .. y L :.::'j•:t Y': :: 8 hdslide Hazard AreYos ........+..,,...i_., ., .u... „.i:.,.,,.. _.—............. ... . .... « . e.....-u�.... ,. -L x' ......, ... ...7..a.... .. i . ...... .......u.. ......... .......— ......11 u. ..,.... ......,T...[,. ,... ... :7� Site Description During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may contain (or be adjacent to) critical areas, including Geologically Hazardous Areas (Erosion and/or Landslide Hazard Areas) and a Stream, pursuant to Chapters 23.40, 23.80 and 23.90 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.edmondswa.gov. The associated LiDAR map indicates that the subject parcel is fairly,level at 76th Avenue West and slopes gently to the west over the bulk of the site. The parcel falls off near the western edge of the,site and there is a steeper section adjacent on.the southwest. Soils on the.,eastern . 2/3 of the site are identified as Alderwood Urban land complex (8% - 15% slope) while the western 1/3 of the site is Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loams (25% - 70% slope). As a result, the slopes in excess of 15% are classified as a potential erosion hazards and the portion that exceeds 40% is a potential landslide hazard area. Allowed Activities & Exempt Proposals - Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.220. Similarly, certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed or exempt activity, please contact a Planner for more information. General Report Requirements Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. Erosion Hazard Areas Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater, among others. Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A. In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the director's discretion. At'a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required. Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area and must meet additional criteria. For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance ECDC 18.30 will be considered to meet the Critical Areas "Study Required" determination. The determination of "suitable slope stability' will be made by both the Planning and Engineering divisions of the City of Edmonds. In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. Report requirements are Page 12 given in;ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. Development standards are given in ,ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. Landslide Hazard Areas Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of citizens when incompatible development is sited in areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase the hazard to surrounding development and use. The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional)15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is,prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050). The alteration must also meet the requirements listed ECDC 23.80.060. In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) . feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. Determination: Study Required This review applies to the entire subject parcel, Depending on the location and project proposed relative to the identified critical areas,'certain studies and reports may be required. Please contact the Planning Division at 425.771.0220 if and when you have a specific development proposal for this site in order to discuss the various permits that will be required. Mike Clugston, Associate.Planner Name, Title Signature, i i I i i Q September 24; 2012 Date Page 13 T C 0 J v Critical Areas flap File Number: CRA20120076 16900 76th Ave. W "This map displays LIDAR data at approximate 2-foot contour d intervals. This map is for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for any action. Actual topography should be verified in the field by survey for accuracy. This map is provided with all faults on an "as is" and "as available" basis. No warranty is any kind is given. Users of this map agree to indemnify and save harmless the City of Edmonds, its officials, officers, employees and/or agents from and against any claim, demand or action, irrespective of the nature of the cause of the claim, demand or action, arising out of any use or possession of this map." r7 T ti nn J O 1 t ni O 1 `Cc f I ' i I I f{ o 1 inch = 50 feet City of Edmonds Critical Area Notice of Decision Applicant: ;I rok- Property Owner: Fs /Z/- Critical Area File #: ZD 1 �� 6 Permit Number: Ca - 20 Site Location: �� � — WkI4 J{ u) Parcel Number: Z -7© U O-7 00 10 1002 Project Description: F1 C-(2 Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above. 1. There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. 2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. 3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. ❑ Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. ❑ Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160: 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40:120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; 3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.1.60 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of noncompliance. ' 4!4—Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. ❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). Reviewer Signature OrDate Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. Revised 12/16/2010 The City of EdmoeoTREET FILE APPLICATION for SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION tg REPAIRS ❑ UNN PLANT EASEMENT No ........................................... OWNER /D ....... FO .... s ... ................................................................ CONTRACTOR /f.4 ........ H ..................................................... PERMIT N � -7 -- 4-3- -- --- ADDRESS ..... .. ............................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . ............................................. BLOCK No . .......................................... NAME OF ADDITION ...... ...... .................................................................... OR DO r � �55 4 41A %V Approved: DATE J4701, ............. ............................................. By .. .............. I . ...... ....... G K. Date: April 17, 1967 Memo to: John E. Moran Supt.-of Public Works From: Leif R. Larson City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Property Description: Attached Commonly Mown. cis: 16900 - 76th Avenue West Owner: G.D: Foss Z.F.F. Calculation: ( ) x ( ) - 112.73 Z:F.F: (112.7t " x ($5.50 ) _ $.620.00 Connection Fee Public Works Department Use Only: ( 1 ) Unit x ($25.00) • $ Trunk Charge $ Permit TOTAL „fit � .. ,�...�.......,. . _ .... `.. _...... ..... 1111 that portion ()1' f,oycrnricnt l..ot v I of >cction 7, fui;risi►ih 27 ;; 2, nlso known as Sl 1 I �� A, ' ` f: w' BeFinnin}; at tho l:<�st '�' t •�f•� described a; fo},lo„5.' 11' 45” fast: 6(J2.?.7 feet;} t1c.n`e aC said ocction 7,; thence Nor to h .I1esterly margin of ?,ie<idoc,-Dale koad}Jan I true Dint So 1 � thence continuin �� f� �3� 1U" Nest 22 SO feet Q North 61° 3, 1lJ nest 1(� P of beginning thence he a curve to t}re right having aQ radius o£-120�feet 3.53 feet to a point curve; ! ! feet; thence North ?.3 ° O1 �� g for 80.69 30 West 76.47 feet 3 a 1 301 Nescuryc;l5-feet thence North 90 right havin° * thence on a curve to t}Je21, ! g ;, a radius of 17U feet for 67. 10" East 10.92 feet to a 93 .feet; thence North l3° 32 having a radius of 15U feet1foro118.J07efeetenceton aocurve to the left. ont f sail ''curve to t}Jc left to th,West; thence South }i. O;i' (J5" aste75,21 nt of* which bearsNorth 31a} ent 5auths 386.4l��feet t(i westerly niarc feet; thence South °3U;�48" i l ll A., Wliai of �1caJoJrla 34 , �•st a.lo(►g said ��'estcrly ,naz in244 to i�o;td; thence ,:true Point of beginttin X..44.88 feet to t.IJu ;:road; 'situate- in the C:ountySoft•Snohormish le Westerly 40 feet thereof .for count sh, State of IVash.ingtorJ. y. ... n41Ili •It Uq7. 111"lk A'l111l1 U: 1. CITY OF EDMONDS :1; 6-1107 when!n CIVIC C, -CERNo Inspcc- tions ssMYday, Sunday or holidays.) WATER -SEWER DEPARTIVMI��,211U-',�aspection. ADE SEWER PERMIT 16900 76th Avenue West G D Fo s s Jake Z i e r vWNE1% ------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Permission is granted ------April ..7-Apri1 ... 1 8 ................. 19.. 67, for ......................... days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer ........ .. . with City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected. NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%. No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted. NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for, failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion. - NOTE No. 5--1 t is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for In the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its appur- tenances except to insert the pipe into the wye. h r STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL N , a • 250 - 5TH AVE. N.. EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (206) 771-0220 • FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT j p Public Works • Planning Parks and Recreation Engineering 890 19i°i i August 6, 1993 i Gerald Foss 1!6900 - 76th Ave. W. Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Foss: I' have reviewed your account and will allow a credit to your account according to our City policy: the average consumption for the same period during the previous year charged at normal customer rates, plus the excess usage charged at the City's cost, plus a surcharge of 15% applied to the excess only. Only one leak credit will be granted in any three year period. Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new b.illing,'please contact Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk. Sincerely, .Ron Holland .Water/Sewer Supervisor RH/lk cc: Ilene Larson Utility Billing Clerk 607825/TXTWATER t . • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister Cities International - Hekinan, Japan i a P le4;ze Ad) �Vq - ��T�so78ZS RECEivED PUBLIC WORKS DEPS WAISM SGRvlce Drawing The City of Edmons��� �� f � ST' L EASEMENT NO_ ____________________________________________ NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPAIRS LID NO_ __________________ ASMT. NO. __--___----__-_--_ OWNER---------------•--______---------_.___-•----•-------••-•------•--------------------------------- CONTRACTOR ----------------------•-------•------------- ------ PERMIT NO. JOB A DRESS ��p00 - '----------------------------0 r--77 TH -•--•--- --/ V:. W-'-------•-•-- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO- -------------------•------------------ BLOCK NO. -----------•----------•------------ ---•-------------------------•-•--•--•-••----------•-•-----------------------------• NAME OF ADDITIQN ---------------------------------------------•---•---•-•----------------------••----------•------------------------ ... •---•-----•-•-•• •-------------------• •------------•-------------_--_ •-_ ••-•--- . Znr f;1 P n � Ct r •_ - R r- plc . c;�: rjc. � - -- TI, c. ;. tr c. t. (, } I, 1 �r Vt n 6. 4 p o 6% Dx b� N s J J • A�Q�\� Cp 1 A 1-11/75 (REV.11178) Approved: q DATE .�-_1_,r?._ .__.5- By - 'q.N.i"t..Jti..NF`/'QIR W�PYW�-N!'JN�'1'.'��fY�'�.`CWPi� �.•�2' ..'N -^-I ^E��1RW�Yr"✓'�1-''PQ 'INi,a�`rJf'�us[` i.. CITY OF EDMONDS KVED COMMUNITY SER I,-4 f RIGHT-OF-WAY P . A. • Owner: NWashington NAtural Gas Company B. • Contractor: S15eMorcer Street Mailing Address CPAtt A WA 98111 City State Zip Permit No. Issue Date 1? 0 Name Mailing Address City State Zip State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 16900 76 Avenue West Type of Work to be Done: Install New Service n D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or. Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily XX Utility E. o Pavement Cut: 19 Y ❑ N F. • Size of Cut: 2 X 4 (1) @ Gas APPLICANT TO, READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature -.to this application, agrees to hold the City. of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind r/ e�giptionmh_at�oever, fgr&een or unforseen; that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its dep,ttnefits.or empldy�s; t3 luding or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court c sts;- and attorne°y4feesby reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ; Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 771-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date: November 2, 1990 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work >, APPROVED BY: R Z Time Authorized: Void after f- t 6 ST -daps: O .. w Special Conditions: NA . a RELEASED BY- t Date G PERMIT FEE: , . , 30. do Restoration Fee: �a lb -le~ DISRvOT-m FEE Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: E Street Cut Dimensions: x = $ INSPECTED BY Date w NO WORK TO BEGIN 'PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE . FIELD INSPECTION NOTES Comments• Diagram: (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.) CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION O YES 0 NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: Date: FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 _ w y M M WV �1G AVAzNngbn&wWCcffp&V �ODD . I, pcv ('0 WNG to i existin �____ propose : Addendum to: City of Edmonds Permit Application Engineering Aide: Kerry Walsh Washington Natural Gas 622-6767 x2761 ater main depth unknown Key: -s- sanitary sewer -w- water -g- gas water valve hydrant 815 Mercer St. (P.O. Box 1869), Seattle, WA 98111(206) 622-6767 September 10, 1969 Mr. G.D. Foss 16900 - 76th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Foss: You as property owner of 16900 - 76th Avenue West have paid a sewer connection charge in lieu of assessment and, therefore, will not be assessed again under any local improvement district for sewer service. However, if the property is subdivided, it would be subject to permit and trunk charges for any additional residences. Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS LEIF R. LARSON City Engineer LRL/rf • STREET FILE Memo to: 'John E. Moran Supt. of Public Works From: Leif R. Larson City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Property Description: Attached Date: 1_1..2 1962 Commonly Known as: 1,69O0 - 76th Avenue Wiest Owner: G.D. Foss Z.F.F. Calculation: ( ) x ( ) (112.7) x 05.50 ) Public Works Department Use Only: ( 1 ) Unit x ($25.00) 112.73 $620.00 Z.F.F. Connection Fee $ Trunk Charge $ Permit TOTAL ;,All that Portion of Government l.,ot 4y `' Of Section 7, Towasll.lr� �� �, also known) as SC I 13%ginnin.• It 27 .,.R. 1 Ci.tV.+l., described asCf011ol,s,"! r Ci a ;, r( i 11 r}S" f,�si: the t 1/4 ct�rrter of said Sect y to llesterl� b�`•?.7 Ceet• ion 7; �. ° t1-ehce North 61 ° thence orth..l ` thence nargin of I,�e;ldotl:dale koad 33', 1U" IVe st 22. SU feet. continuing Ivcrrth (,1° r anal true Poinf. of bee .inninv; thence on a curve 3'' lt! ''lest 1`•�5.53 feet feet; thence Northt,i °lte ; lght having a�- radi.us o f ' to �a Point curve; :! U1 _ 120 -feet for 30 !Vest 76.E 3U !'Jest 1.41..1•.5 feet. 80.69 . 17 feet to a point of Curve; , thcncc t;orth 9° 1,1' } lOghFastvlOgna 1�aC1IUS of 170 feet for 67.93Once on a i 10.92 2 feet to actrrvc to t11e havinga Point of 'th�'nce North 139 32, radius of 15U feet for 113U07�feet1ence on a 1 ".of said curve to the Left.; West• curve to the left I the tangent the Point of thence South g9°'03, „ tangent 411, S of• which bears North 31° 33' 4811 Southal t 33b.41�rfeet to lt�esterlyatnarginst 75. 2of � j ° lit feet; thence South 330 U5' 11 4S IVest along said !Nester! }ea`}Ot'raale ttoacl• true Point of be�;innin,� , thence road Y margin 244.8g feet to the ;' .'situate- in the CountLSS the Westerly 40 'feet thereof for o•E $ mi sh State county, . Y no ho , to o E IV• ° I aSji,i.rl};ton. p, 1 • 1: I MG. 1(1•L'l. •i'/I ICI I - 1 September 10, 19G9 Mr. G.D. Foss 16900 - 76th Avenue Kest Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Fosse You as property owner of 16900. - 76th Avenue West have paid a sewer connection charge in lieu of assessment and, therefore, will not be assessed again under any local improvement district for sewer service. However, if the property is subdivided, it would be subject to permit and. trunk charges for any additional residences. Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS LEIF R. LARSON City Engineer LRL/rf a 7�r X.1 �IHI 1 C7 O CCD Gl� a� r �4 c� r CD 77. I Er' 11 Y �i I + f t CY ITY -OF E D M O N.D S --- z--•_.------- PUBYSG (140RRS_— ENGINEERING ACTION REPORT SUSPENSE DATE: Date: �2�5/Q (� Time: 3 ` 'S� File # / Attachments: -ate SUBJECT: REQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE CONTACT IN OFFICE OTHER: 0 RECEIVE RnIITF Tn. =Yes 0 No NAME 11NIT. DATE # OPR NAME YNIT. DATE 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 1 1 7 10 ACTIONN:k- 7lc �� . �/ 1 � P GPI-a_.��' '�'/1✓ All Concerned Notified Action Completed/File