The URL can be used to link to this page

16919 76TH AVE W.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII 6178 16919 76TH AVE W ADDRESS: to-F TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: 00 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS:��b� (f a 1 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver � Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:- /�6c SEWER LID FEE S: LID SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:_co /� y SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #: GEOTECH REPORT DA' STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: BLOCK: LATEMP\DSTsTomu\Street File Checklist.doc KRIVI lY pLANN G r13o 06 Zone-, Corner Fla&_ �t c„t it d Actual Front Sides Z 10 &0 11.7 1 N6 2S Rear Zs� NT Other eiGht Z S� < 2-r Go 3 I dUG'f Z1GS- 12 Pro puty&. v RESUB ..__u 16 cf H 761 ct v e. t cJ DEC 2 i 2007 141 GC O ES U �1 G - 3UI CITY O DEPARTMENT DITY OF EDMONDS JAN 28 2GL)4 BUCITM O DEDMO STREET FILE -,I, - �0 �c4le !I KraZal & ASSOCIATES INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION January 16, 2008 Mr. Jeff Jones 16919 76"' Avenue Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Limited Geologic Hazards Evaluation and Recommendations Proposed Deck Addition — Existing Single Family Residence 16919 760 Avenue Southwest Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Jones: KA Project No. 092-08005 JAN 2 2 2008 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS This letter report presents the results of our Limited Geologic Hazard Evaluation and Recommendations for the referenced project. A Krazan & Associates project geologist visited the site on January 10, 2008 to evaluate the current geologic conditions. PURPOSE AND SCOPE We have prepared this letter to address the applicable elements of the City of Edmonds Code (23.40.090D, and 23.40.110 through 23.40.140) as well as the Edmonds Municipal Code — Natural Resources — Chapter 23.80 — Geologically Hazardous Areas. In preparation of this report, we have reviewed the published geologic information for the site. A visual assessment of the site vegetation, slopes, and surficial conditions was also performed. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Based on our conversations with the client, we understand that the proposed construction includes the construction and expansion of an existing upper level deck located along the western side of the existing residence. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located at 16919 76"' Avenue Southwest in Edmonds, Washington. The property is nearly rectangular with a total area of approximately 0.29 acres. The area of the proposed addition is currently developed with an existing multiple story residential structure. The majority of the site is gently sloping and vegetated with grasses and typical residential landscaping. A slope area is located along the western property line and extends downward to the west at magnitudes of up to 80 percent. This slope is approximately 10 feet tall and is vegetated grasses and shrubs typically associated with landscaping. The site is bordered to the south, east, and north by residential structures and to th�1 est R b 76'h Avenue Southwest. k� A Er FILE Eleven Offices Serving The Western United States 11715 N. Creek Parkway S., #C-106 9 Bothell, Washington 98011 9 (425) 485-5519 9 Fax: (425) 485-6837 KA No. 092-08005 January 16, 2008 Page 2 of 5 GEOLOGIC SETTING The site lies within the central Puget Lowland. The lowland is part of a regional north -south trending trough that extends from southwestern British Columbia to near Eugene, Oregon. North of Olympia, Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances/retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains, and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and nonglacial sediments consisting of interbedded gravel, sand, silt, till, and peat lenses. The Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles Washinglon, indicates that the site is underlain by Vashon Glacial Till. Vashon Glacial Till is typically characterized by an unsorted, nonstratified mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders in variable quantities. These materials are typically dense and relatively impermeable. The poor sorting reflects the mixing of the materials as these sediments were overridden and incorporated by the glacial ice. FIELD INVESTIGATION A field investigation consisting of direct observation of the site conditions, in particular the area adjacent to the proposed deck addition. Local T-probing of the slope area as well as within the proposed column footings to help evaluate the shallow soil characteristics, indicated medium dense or firmer native glacial soil conditions. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Landslide/Slope Hazard An approximately 80 percent magnitude slope is located 10 feet from the proposed addition (western end). This slope is up to 10 feet tall, and is currently vegetated with grasses and shrubs typically associated with landscaping. We did not observe evidence of past slope movement, and there is no evidence of likely future movement. Erosion Hazard The Natural Resources Conservation Service maps indicate that the site is underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (15 to 25 percent slopes). The Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam is a soil unit typically derived from outwash materials. These soils are described as having "Moderate" to "Severe" erosion potential in a disturbed state. It has been our experience that soil erosion potential can be minimized through landscaping and surface water runoff control. Typically erosion of exposed soils will be most noticeable during periods of rainfall and may be controlled by the use of normal temporary erosion control measures, i.e., silt fences, hay bales, mulching, control ditches or diversion trenching, and contour furrowing. Erosion control measures should be in place before the onset of wet weather, if any grading occurs outside of the structure. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-08005 January 16, 2008 Page 3 of 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed addition to the residence may be located as proposed, approximately 10 feet from the steep slope west of the residence. It is our opinion that this distance provides an adequate setback and buffer during and following construction, provided adequate erosion control measures are in place during construction. The addition may be supported on the proposed 12 by 18 inch concrete footings placed on the medium dense native soils, or on compacted structural fill placed on the suitable soils. We found no evidence of a landslide hazard, and recognize that the soils present a limited erosion hazard in their current conditions. It is our opinion, based on our site observations and knowledge of the proposed construction, that additional subsurface exploration and detailed slope stability analyses are not required. It is also our opinion that detailed survey work and geotechnical analyses for the site slope conditions are not warranted. Foundation Support The proposed structure may be supported on the proposed 12 by 18 inch shallow foundation system bearing on the medium dense or firmer, native soils, or on properly compacted structural fill placed on the suitable native soils. The column footings may be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) dead plus live load, if the footings bear directly on medium dense or firmer native soils, or on properly compacted structural fill placed on the suitable native soils. Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and sediment control (ESC) is used to minimize the transportation of sediment to wetlands, streams, lakes, drainage systems, and adjacent properties. Erosion and sediment control measures should be taken and these measures should be in general accordance with local regulations. As a minimum, the following basic recommendations should be incorporated into the design of the erosion and sediment control features of the site: 1) Phase the soil, foundation, utility, and other work, requiring excavation or the disturbance of the site soils, to take place during the dry season (generally May through September). However, provided precautions are taken using Best Management Practices (BMP's), grading activities can be undertaken during the wet season (generally October through April), but it should also be known that this may increase the overall cost of the project. 2) All site work should be completed and stabilized as quickly as possible. 3) Additional perimeter erosion and sediment control features may be required to reduce the possibility of sediment entering the surface water. This may include additional silt fences, silt fences with a higher Apparent Opening Size (AOS), construction of a berm, or other filtration systems. Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States KA No. 092-08005 January 16, 2008 Page 4 of 5 4) Any runoff generated by dewatering discharge should be treated through construction of a sediment trap if there is sufficient space. If space is limited other filtration methods will need to be incorporated. To prevent erosion after the project, the homeowner should limit the removal of native vegetation in the area on and adjacent to the slope, although we understand that the slope is part of the adjacent property. Vegetation should not be removed from slope areas without protection of exposed soils, and immediately re-establishing permanent erosion control on the site. Water flow on the slope should be limited, and roof, footing, and yard drains should not be directed toward, or onto the slope. LIMITATIONS Geotechnical engineering is one of the newest divisions of Civil Engineering. This branch of Civil Engineering is constantly improving as new technologies and understanding of earth sciences improves. Although your site was analyzed using the most appropriate current techniques and methods, undoubtedly there will be substantial future improvements in this branch of engineering. In addition to improvements in the field of geotechnical engineering, physical changes in the site either due to excavation or fill placement, new agency regulations or possible changes in the proposed structure after the time of completion of the soils report may require the soils report to be professionally reviewed. In light of this, the owner should be aware that there is a practical limit to the usefulness of this report without critical review. Although the time limit for this review is strictly arbitrary, it is suggested that two years be considered a reasonable time for the usefulness of this report. Foundation and earthwork construction is characterized by the presence of a calculated risk that soil and groundwater conditions have been fully revealed by the original foundation investigation. This risk is derived from the practical necessity of basing interpretations and design conclusions on limited sampling of the earth. Our report, design conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in this report. The recommendations made in this report are based on the assumption that soil conditions do not vary significantly from those disclosed during our field investigation. The findings and conclusions of this report can be affected by the passage of time, such as seasonal weather conditions, manmade influences, such as construction on or adjacent to the site, natural events such as earthquakes, slope instability, flooding, or groundwater fluctuations. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, the geotechnical engineer should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be made. The conclusions of this limited report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed construction. If the proposed construction is relocated or redesigned, the conclusions in this report may not be valid. The geotechnical engineer should be notified of any changes so that the recommendations can be reviewed and reevaluated. The geotechnical information presented herein is based upon professional interpretation utilizing standard engineering practices and a degree of conservatism deemed proper for this project. It is not warranted that such information and interpretation cannot be superseded by future geotechnical developments. We emphasize that this report is valid for this project as outlined above, and should not Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 0 0 KA No. 092-08005 January 16, 2008 Page 5 of 5 be used for any other site. Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our client. No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (425) 485-5519. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Chris Behrens, L.G., L.E.G Senior Engineering Geologist BC/cb Krazan & Associates, Inc. Offices Serving The Western United States 10 APPLICATION The City of Edmonds for SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT NO. -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS ❑ LID N? t<qZZ21_Vjl. NO.�ate, OWNER ------- CONTRACTOR NO. --------------------------- I ------------------------ --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT .... ............ . I cc>la) � CD E—=- -'*-N. JOB ADDRESS ----------------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO.------------------------------- ............................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAMF nF AnnTTMN -------------------------------- 0 0 - 7-7, _,7 =UI— 10777,— �; I,�j�}i s'ti�� sill; it ,,,; , ifC+ITY`.;� t$ ,F� iE J5 ��M�}; �; i i �i�S�. :�S'IiDfE` `S'E�W�E�R:, rt1!?,�'R�M�I�,�';; `r ,�t v -A -EPA E ,,!i-W.AlfkWSEWER ',D itiM- N�Pll'- l,t fvl% P IRIMIT ON t oil, .4 f 1. f2s,llit' - C 11 77.5- 5251 1 or - side ?Sewer�: i'n9plic6oh;,)i t tioni" V 'prewi e %withint;24 t,;. st.� 9 atjSun'.,Jor. Sohday tInspec n.. -'....t.....................-........2.; , ...........................1...6..t...I. .. v i ... ... .ADDRESS)ON\OF'CONSTRUCT10N2....... ... ............................ r,t it f ............................ ........... ......... ERTYe.LEGAIL1DESCi1PT1 .... A pt x r >, 4, 4 ............. ................................. .......... ...................... .......... ....................................................................................................... ............................ 0,VVNEW'kN1j'/.OR' BUILDER`' .. 10.1j. 1. S.,'. J ......................... .................. ....... .... ................................ -o sorv,*:!� wer -;P i�it -6 Rd 6AVd ku 1: 4 "'., El;&'ADDRES�', sa�;: h6 J`nb� _IbQQ9.�:tN. A&zid.oWd .1, L "I ......................... ........................................................... ................. .. ................................ ........ .... ....... , on 19ygran'ted _19.474' . . ..... f repair. anli]V.br,� ..... . .............. .................... or ;eoniiectiiinof ;a stdo•,sewer'ytof the city t`, .�. sanitary SY�ten,-Intaccon&Ln�04wliwCft�-0 'Ednonds�)ordininees oz� - -',l APTENTION,tIS4CAILLED, TO} THEF01A;0.;I'NG � ne�I-A'Alcensed:tSidet ntract6rt,muAt=..be.,.employed) lto%i, congtruct' area. Dot riot.'coiieit"to_construct' iew6r-_1ns1de..ilroiiek`�ti1 any,�Portlori �of �gew uc-before it' has'.ibeen0rispects&'..": .- NOTE,,No:, 2—All, r' equires-lan,, the� 61ty,'_'Engl� rflier,'. �1. "'�si office 4-:TG f-48ii��S�.cr.•musthline, and' 12i,63hei!i�ildt:piopert�,]Jhe; radekof- ..Z,Vol !bends- mjgrade-,an d' ! iircei,:m6'gf-be,.%�'ater/,settledI ai�dtSurfELce,iof'�,street-,rditoredt *�,oriiginahko�idltjbmil NOTE�,14o;,5--:T�ench�s�!1n;s may, dev'61opt.withiri -onc,g.Ear4df c6miilctlon - - .. -'. 11. .. I " — fr . : - ; Provided�for.lin-,the, hermita[ny,�work on,'Ahe,� A�t,uniawftllltto�,ali;r _r, �o.if�ny.,,,other.,%%,Orkl,than*,isto.,do� I ' rO 1 lfito.�thc'-wye 6. _se. Ahe�pipe DI5 ,.AP PR ............. . .........v.. ..................... .. ...y......!.................. Da dt" ..................................7..... .......... .............4.......... ........ APPROVED Dates.11** Remarks :1' .............. ftty. . y BOTH P mW. opies, v...I.. n. tjspect...o...n thit4hevsidb4eweisirstEllitibroconstructed(iund6i,ithi'.s... b...p.....e....r....r . it.*.-r' 4 whey .:Wn Q t il Ve,& ni-dccord'4'n�e,�eWithu'a'll'.-'gov,6rnirigordinances ,6f-,-,the4eit -.7 ... ...... . .. .. ........... ........ 1) Ddf6de�.thlk ... ... Water E];, !,j Gas} Sewer_ BEF for:. 'G Cheek" ORD'you,41g,' er j -- e,, I- 41 .ilv J APPLICATION ` .The City of Edmonds for EASEMENT NO_ ____________________________________________ SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION fft-*" REPAIRS ❑ LID S .. -�-- - ------ -- . Ng- ------------------ PAZ OWNER .R 1 J. r ~ C/ C=� CC ----------- -----.---•---------------------••- CONTRACTOR .�. - --... PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS ___ %�__._.......I.K -'�._r ° 51 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO. .................................... .......--•--••-•-------------••-•------••---•-•----••---•-----•---••---...-------•------•---------......---------•-- ............................................. NAME OF ADDITION ...... _.17�.�_�._ �_�_ RECEIVED JUN 2 4 1974 i Approved: f i i DATE-•--••-• ----------------------=-----••---•• BY .......................... v c R E 1v1 I T T .A'� c CES PAYABLE TO: EVERS VERNE SIE 1969 SNOHOMISFl COIJNlY TRE<ASUrER P -_____.__._ EVERB%i,NASIiINuiYON 94101 elau�we 1�" v ^ SECURIIIES MTG CO F i SNOHOMISH COUNT 26917 �( y'r s (Y 30O SECURITIES BLDG L0 'TS JOY ;� STATE: OF WASHINGTc C: ^) SEATTLE 1 >'YASfi g3`?97_61 !j OF ALL STATL:, COUNTY, W c \ _ ROAD A k•,. tiR Vt 47 ``.0 .C:.. ..'t RGr I ::�. Df I 'Pr: -IA �I S�HOOI AP:(J ROAD TA M1� 121 167 023C) l D-4- MEADO'WDALE BEACH < ; =" L) BAAP ON E LN TR 121 494.760S OF NE COR �' TH I' 0020'E 10','TH.N 87°^6"id 126,7-1 �! NAME Ou T H a COMP;v`f-----°20°ti,lbo'TI.rOB J.l PAGE.- , '^•' C+. ---�-- --- - -- --- - '� .--------._--!_._— - Al :,Ilo : _.': ;oUDATCp IaT ' ._- -- -- 37.92 2 6� 6, 2 9 7 6 5 0 91 °0 6" 6 - + L�; 2- - 3 ----- 10 6 —-.--_--TFiE r'GUhE3—B-ELOW""R PRES'cNT. THE D15PO51TION-' iF__YOUIS TAX—MOIES7 <.P^r._— --- a- _ -r-- - - ---- �--- - -- _...._� f CfSi. WATER39,28 39;15 161.39 242.99 � ---------- - -- - { F. -- ry kz'` FIRST HALF TAXES MUST BE PAID BEFORE APRIL 30rh, OR ENTIRE TAX BECOMES DELINQUENT. _ �. rl LAST HALF~ BECOMES DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1. INTEREST, 83 ' PER ANNUM. 1 � /-. • i "i i-PIES- _ Memo to: Ron Whaley Assistant Public Works Director From: Leif R. Larson City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Legal Description: A portion of Tract 121, Meadowdale Beach; BAAP on E line of Tract 121, 494.76, S of NE corner; thence N 0*20' E 1001; thence N 87006' W 126.781; thence S 0*20' W 1001; thence S 87°06' E 1.26.780 POB. Commonly known as: 16919 - 76th Ave. W. Owner: Louis L. Joy Z.F.F. Calculation: ( 21.15) Z.F.F. x ($ 5.50) _ $ 300.00 ( 1 ) Unit x ($ 25.00) _ $ 25-00 $ 10.00 rf:lj cc: Mr. Louis L. Joy Connection Fee (minimum) Trunk Charge Permit 335.00 TOTAL f I Hurst 1 4Stanforl { Istanford , 1 f Joy Vicinity Sketch for Sewer Connection Memos attached. 0 #P20 Critical areas Checklist CA File No:.Z Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/ Location: OA- 2 Property Tax Account Number: 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): - ,;��oC✓ v� 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is site developed? &z Q 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: -.4,�)—; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain ,/-,0 of a watercourse. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? A,16 (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs ; mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) V__ 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: For City Staff Use Only 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? 2. Site is Zoned? Z 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? A ckpw"o oai'l 0 m •. 4. Critical Afeas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on sit? °S� 6 e. Y o st an u e&s- o u e ram- dss,0<� l T/, h Z &-tgf" jr S. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?_ nn _ DETERMINATION _ �L'� ti erryy� . f/ STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER #rzo City of PdMonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application . for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of theapplication to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to. complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). n Date Received: ,12�4/ City Receipt #: &Z L-/-" Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: . $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATEPLEASE PRINTCLEARLY Owner/Applicant: Applicant Representative: ` Name Name Street Address Street Address City State Zip City Stateip- Telephone: Telephone: Email address (optional): Email Address (optional): • • CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 16919 76th Avenue West Tax Acct. Number: 00513100012105 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2007-0162 Applicant: Jeff Jones Owner: Jeff Jones CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site contains and/or is adjacent to critical areas, including Geologically Hazardous Areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). Topography in the vicinity slopes fairly steeply from east -to -west (generally, 15%-25% slope). The subject parcel follows this trend and also exhibits a more significant drop on the western parcel boundary in excess of 50%. GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: • Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. • Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. • For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090. D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. • A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). • Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.13. • In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. • Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. • The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23..40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. 2 EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. Name Signature Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 3 A' .� w F W N U EETFILE EASEMENT AND JOINT SEWER AGREEMENT For a good and valuable consideration, the grantors: Robley D Hurst and Sara G Hurst, his wife, John "P Stanford and June M Stanford, his wife, and Hilder bjenTeim, 1 an'individual', and Louis L Jov and Doyie M Joy, his wife hereby grant to �. j Robley D Hurst and Sara G Hurst his wife John P Stanford and June N1 Stanford, his wife, and Hilder Gjendem an individual, and Louis L Joy and Dovie M Joy: his wife �> an easement for the installation, operation, \ and maintenance of a joint sanitary sewer line over, across, through, under and upon the following described property, situated. in. Snohomish County, State of Washington, w to -wit: FIRST: There shall be an easement six (6) feet wide, three (3) feet on either side of the center line described in .Exhibit "A'.:, attached. hereto ! 2 _ and...hereby incorporated in full for. this reference. 1 SECOND: The parties mutually agree that the necessary documents will be 'i xecuted to make the easement a.matter of public record and they will are the cost of recording equally. 1 ? ;iIRD: The cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of that portion_ -- - tf the sewer used' in common shall- be -borne "in"equal"shares', except that he. owners of any lower parcel shall not be responsible for the part of. the sewer above their connection; and when necessary to repair,'clean•or, reconstruct the sewer, the parties to this -agreement shall have a. right of entry for that purpose. FOURTH: This agreement shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be.binding',"upon all parties and their heirs and. assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF we hereunto set, our hand and .seals this. day of.V R in the year. (spouse.) .. �; ' spouse k_ (thusband) - lsoouse) husband (spouse) STATE -.OF WASHINGTON ): ss COUNTY OF.SNOHOMISH ) On this day of A 19 ZQ. personally appeared before me Robley D Hurst and Sara G Hurst, his wife, John P Stanford and June M Stanford, his wife, and Hilder Gjendem, an individual; and Louis L Joy and Dovie M Joy, his wife to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within instrument and. acknowledged thatTH� / signed and sealed the same as �&ej/ free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day of \//9/i/ in the year....... ARY PUBLIC i ! or the:::4- W o !�a ij�n�tpn fa' VOL 3(4 i'.1A50 ,`'. •� r ♦ may. , .,wv i r _ - .v..�. �►..� '� 1i7 41 EXH I BIT "A" �. All Beginning 771; feet.north and 20 feet east of the west quarter corner -of Sec- tion 8; Township 2.7 North, Range 4 East, W'M., in Snohomish County, Washington, the True Po.j.nt of Beginning of: the ,center-li.ne herein -described; thence S87°061E a :_d.i stance of 1'94 feet; thence NO°20'-E a d-i stance of .3-16 feet to the ter-m-i nus of ; the centerline .herein described.' (. . t 9. .a • y ` Y l J "N I F 1 s� l ' u .1 STREET FILE Date: November 7, 1969 Memo to: Ron Whaley Assistant Public Works Director From: Leif R. Larson City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Legal Description: A portion of Tract 121, Meadowdale Beach; BAAP on E line of Tract 121, 494.76' S of NE corner; thence N 0120' E 1001; thence N 87°06` W 126.78'; thence S 0020' W 1001; thence S 87°06° E 126.78' POB. Commonly known as: 16919 - 76th Ave. W. Owner: Louis L. Joy Z.F.F. Calculation: ( 21.15 ) Z. F. F. x 5.50) _ $ 300.00 ( 1 ) Unit x ($ 25.00) _ $ 25.00 $ 10.00 335.O0 rf:lj cc: Mr. Louie L. Joy Connection Fee (minimum) Trunk Charge Permit TOTAL • )'w it � ,�'i Li •Hurs t StanforP !21 Ll- 1 IStanrfo 121 119 joy Rm j Vicinity Sketch for Sewer Connection Memos attached. 0 117, { cl� v !' Z' F JJ r if i lob REGARDING: �k7 tA��eR'ue West_170,3va-Do� D S� d R E C O R D O F C 0 N T A C T S DATE NAME, PHONE N0., ADDRESS of CALLER -COMMENTS ACTION TAKEN INITIALS 5/1/74 Louis Joy Certified Letter No. 406185 sent Letter received. TE 743-2455 requiring hook-up within 60 days. 5/17/74 Had major operation and will be down Spoke with Jack on phone. TE for 6 weeks. Has money and contractor. Cant get to bank until Dr. says okay.. 6/24/74 Russ Johnson came into office and paid TE • connection fee of $335 and obtained permit #4885. 6/24/74 Connection completed. TE 7/1/74 Certified Letter No. 406514 sent Letter received. Disregard TE requiring response by�July 12. LO 00 c—i r O I RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL--30e (plus postage) ,PpMA♦ o 302-00800 L.ORr'DATRa . JOY, LOUTS L. "; 169.19 76TH AVE W � EDMONDS, WASHINGTON98020 CD OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered .............150 With delivery to addressee only ............ 650L RECEIPT >_ 2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered .. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850+ � DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d r� DELIVERY SPECIAL (extra fee required)...... W PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) 3800 Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL OPa: 19700-397.450 .+ SENDER:: Be sure ,torfollowr Instructions oa ofher�stde''Rl; i r, ` PLEASE :F'URNISHI SERVICES) 'INDICATE64 i3Y =CHECKED ,BLQCK(S) ' ` (A'dditional.clewrgea,zequered f,e, tAese aervLdes) " +' addPess i Denver ONLY ❑Show s where+delivered , io;_ ddressee•., s RECEIPT .� 7-� Received the numbered articie,d¢scrr6ad below r RECISTERED+.rlo. �81GNATURE OR' AME'OF7ADDRESS E(Must always be, till ed4n `CERTIFIED :NO 1 1 v wliy 1 ` R 'S 2 SIGNATURE. OFADDRESS AG INSURE . NO: DATE DELIVERED WHERE.;DELIVERED, i(Only ifx, :;eated;4wd zncluile ZIP'Qo AW t� -ice .5 .".. I SENDER +Be sure to follow:ristruetons on ot6crslde ry PLEASE iFURNISH' SERVICES) 1NDlCATED,,BY CHECKED-BL+OCiC(S) 3 "T (Additioinal c)tarFes requitad forethese aeov,oes) k + Show address "* , +Deliver} ON Y here delivered addressee 1 ;fo RECEIPT Receivedthe numbered drflcle descnbed•belosw�;' r x; REGISTERED,''N0. `+ SIGNATiURE OR NANIE OFADDRESSEE'(Must,'atways be filled in) a p.� CERTIFIED!No,. L SIGNATURE OF•�AD,DRESSEE'S AGENT; ANY; ,,; ++ IN RED NO., DATE DELIVERED 4SHOW I WHERE DELIVERED (Only of req"eted acid attcludfl,;ZIP Code) f• I J 4., / ., //J k 3f l << VT S90P w J �a r � J as W z V, O �a O W a W V 8 O � W N O zz 0 z >10 STREET FILE Memo to: Ron Whaley Assistant Public Works Director From: Leif R. Larson City Engineer Subject: Sewer Connection Charges Legal Descri tion: A portion of Tract 1219 Meadowdale Beach; BAAP ?771 N & 216.78 of W 1/4 corner of Section 8, Township 27, Range 4; thence S 1350 to 8 line of Tract 121; thence E 110' to.E line of said Tract; thence N 1451; thence N 87*06, W 126.78; thence S 10' thence E 20' to TPB. Commonly known as: (vacant at present) Z.F.F. Calculation: Louis L. Joy Owner: 16919 — 76th Ave. N. ( 26.61) Z.F.F. x ( S5.50 ) = $ 300.00 ( 1 ) Unit x ($ 25.00) = $ 25'00 $ 10.00 $ 335.00 rfslj cc: Mr. Louis L. Joy W Connection Fee (minimum) Trunk Charge Permit TOTAL 'Hurst ....... . iStanfo iL ji Joy Ile, 9 f Vicinity Sketch for Sewer Connection Memos attached. t 7(;. 74 ffia G