17150 TALBOT RD.PDF11111111111111
13438
17150 TALBOT RD
NOV 2 0 1997
DAVID AND INGE JOHNSON RESIDENCE, CITY OF EDMONDS
INTENSUS, ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PO BOX 1486, SNOHOMISH, WA 98291
The contents of this report include:
OVERVIEW
JOHNSON RESIDENCE
17002 Talbot Road
Edmonds, WA
Critical Areas Checklist;
Storm Detention Calculation;
Earthwork Calculation; and,
Retaining Wall Design.
Storm detention volume is calculated using the standard City of Edmonds worksheet. Total
impervious area proposed by this project is 3970 square feet which includes the residence,
driveway from the private drive, and the patio area proposed on the west side of the residence.
Earthwork calculations include residential excavation and excavation necessary to construct the
retaining walls.
Retaining wall design is for three foot high walls constructed on a three foot wide by one foot
deep footing. The wall is to have temperature steel and reinforcing steel for external loading due
to freezing as noted in the analysis.
wrk\i00\0727G40Aovwiew
Interim, Engineer ing & Surveying, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291 * 425-481-7282 * 360-668-7534
111C. 18913
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works e Planning /Building 9 Parks and Recreation - Engineering * Wastewater Treatment Plant
9/12/97
David C & Ingeborg Johnson
21221 Cypress Way
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7936
Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist #97-179
Dear Applicant:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is
located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page).
It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED:
PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS OR CRITICAL AREAS STUDY.
The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a
project -specific determination.
-WITH ALL -4m
You inust submit, a gopy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION
PERMIT APPLICA TIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.
.1
Permit applications Includ6 the following:
Enc: Critical Areas Determinatioh
Architectural D69ign boclid.
C:Reception\iarii�CRLTF�.*doo.,�"I.t
Building Permits
Conditional Use Permits
Subdivisions
Variances
I Ications to the ADB* Land Use Applications
Any other development permit applications.
Thank you.
Diane Cunningham
,Planning Secretary
Incorporated August I L, 1890
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
rlitv nf Ftimnndc
SEP i
CRITICAL AREAS CHE0PM1SqF;1A;.:.
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Pei-mit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her Submittal of a development
permit to the City.
T11C [)LVpOSC Of 111C Checklist is to enable City staff to
delenniiie wilether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be.
, present on the subject property. The
inCoi-ination needed to complete the Checklist should
be casily available from observations of the site or
data available at.CiLy Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill Out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please Submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent infori-nation (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
David C,& Ingeborg Johnson
Name
21221 Cypress Way
Street Address
Lynnwood WA 98036-7936
City State Zip
(425) 774-3560 Fax: (425) 778-5584
Telephone
Signature
September 11, 1997
Date
c:reception\jana\cac1.doc
Applicant Representative: .1
Name
Street Address
City State
Telephone
Signature
Date
Zip
(over)
CA HLE INC).
Critical Areas Checklist
----------------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: 17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds
2. Property Tax Account Number.- 172704-1-073-0008
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 12,028 Sq. Feet
4. Is this site currently developed? _ yes; X no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
— Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
X golling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical
rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present oii site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over
a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No _; Approx. Depth:
No
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway No floodplain No of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area -where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are
year-round? No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow Jshrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No
- — ----- For City Staff Use Only — --------
.777777 — — -- — ---------------
R5
'I.: Site is Zoned?
2, :,.: SCS.Papped:.soil.lyp�sp Veroki
3. :...Wetland invenipryor.C.A. ina�pindicates.w'etI.and.present.6n site? /J.0
4, Critical Are.as.inven.t&y or.C.A. map indicates Critical.Area on sitO.-
desipated 'subsidence.laftdsh.d.e,.h.aza.r.d..a,rel?
:..,:.Site. des igna' Q
ted tally $ensiti.Ye.Areas Map?.----,.
. .. .......
l3ttERNINATION
Aca—chkAm: Rev 02/11/97
DAVOD a RNC92 JOHNSON R09DENCE
STORM D2TENTWN (CAL(CULAT90H
0
I IEXPIRES
ONTENSUS2 2NOMMUNG & SURIV279MC9
IP(D box 944L MONOMER, %VA W2,01
(42M 4@U-M@!2 * ON) (960-IM
Table 1 — Detention Pipe Sizes
Impermeable
Required
Area Sq. Ft.
Vol Cu Ft
2000
50
2500
62
3000
75
3500
87
4000
100
4500
112
5000
125
Note: Allowable Pipe Materials:
Impermeable
Area Sa. Ft.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Pipe Diameter
15" 1811 2411 3011
40
28
16
.10
50
35
20
13
60
42
24
15 Required pipe
70
49
28
18 length in feet
80
56
32
21
90
63
36
23
100
70
40
25
Reinforced Concrete
Aluminized Steel
Aluminum
CMP Asphalt Coated
N — 12 ADS (Not permitted on roads)
Table 2 — Outlet Orifice Sizes
Outlet Orifice Diameter (Inches)
5/8
5/8
3/4
3/4
7/8
7/8
7/8
ITable 3 — Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements
Detention
Max. size
Catch Basin
pipe diameter
knockout
Type
< 1811
2011
Type 1, CB 15
18" to 24"
2611
Type IL, CB 16
24" to 36"
3611
Type 11, C13 19 19 (48" Basin)
36" to 42"
4211
Type 11, CB 19 19 (54" Basin)
*Source: Assoc. Sand & Gravel Co. Standards
5
Revised 3/16/95
STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM
WORKSHEET
OWNER
.2122,1 Cy
,p,-e_U
ADDRESS if
ZYIV4�J&0�� A14
CALC BY: eder
PHONE:
All,� P-
DATE:
*****DESIGN DATA*****
IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFIC E
J131 76 J, 7� 92 71,9 rf
FINISHED
TIGHTL
I DLTENTION PIPE LENGTH I.. VLOCKI
1 4!. MINIMUM (TYP
' MIN &�AROAMNCfop
WSUR OF
M
CONC BOX OR RISER
51 To r, SLOPE
----------- �LO OUTLrT
-OUTLET CONTROL
UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE
CONTROL CATCH BASIN
�,,SYSTEM CROSS SECTION
2'X2'X6* DEEP, 4-6', SPALLS 13R EGUAL
FROM CONTROL CB 2'x 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK EXISTING GRADE
VASHCD ROCK
�,RAsHcD Rc
FROM CONTROL OU
L JTLET
_";ZOUTFLOW TRENC
B� MIN 10' LONG.
ERF PIPE TO LEVEL
_ILL�N�PPERF PIPE W/ END CAPS
TR N H 8HALLCJkLINEF VITH M I RAF
PRJOJ T PLA N WASNED DRAIN ROCK
AtPRAP OUTLEF
RUNOFk-,FPREADER- TRENCH,
FOOTING DRMNS SHAU NOT BE CONNECTER YO DETENTION SYSTEM
NOTES:
I. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection
before backfilling and for final inspections. APPROVED BY
2, Responsibility for operation -and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the ' /I/
responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the storage pipe must be Rushed f-/q 7
out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. The outlet control orifice DATE
must be kept open at all times. . F
6
DAMD a gmag JOHNSON RMDEMU
rcilliffil � i i��i III! iiii iiim;;I� '�
MATHWORK CALCULATOOM
Mgmsuso
PC Dox 94091, sm(DROMEND WA (MID9
(423) 4@0-7292 * GO) M-794
'Ive
INTIENSUS PROJE PAGE
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
PROJECTNo. 407, eW.04
P.O. Box 1486 -'Snohomish, WA 98291 DATE A/a V, 11,1977 BY le,"'?
(206) 481-7282 - (206) 668-7534
k�h.
INN
loom
0
IMENO
MEMO
0
oil
loom
ME
I
NMI
11115
IMMENSE
I MEN
own
No
MENNEIINNOWN MUNINFE
M&NEENIN10 M N 1
on 00-8 IMMM SON Now M
MI limm, -_m
Ins10
MINE
M �W_;qLmw -0 Nils
11111011111101-00 MMMMOM"
INTENSUS
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
P.O. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 (206) 668-7534
PROJECT -1�9aVf � I-1,911JUM — PAGE
PROJECT No. 07. 27-OW, 0--/
DATE lVo v. //, 19 7 BY
F4
vel�4 '�5'
M
MENEM
NONE
NN
ME
MEMO
ME
0
wN
ME
am-N
0
n-
R
MMENEEM
ONE
MOMPROMM
ME
M
M
M
M
M
M
ME
M
M
0
ME
ME
ME
INTIENSUS
PROJEd PAGE
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
RO. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 - (206) 668-7534
A--j A, --n 00 -
PROJECT No. e 7, 2 704. L14
DATE Wo V- /1, 1 �Z -13Y
-Fj
Pill
ONE
"M
��Mffmllo
M
No
MOMMMOM
is
MMME
ME
MENNEN
0
NONE
EMMUMEM
MEMO
SEMEN
MMENE
0
MEMO
fmiam
Elmo-
MINE
a
No
MOEN
M
MENNEN
0
0
MEN
'
EMEMMOM
MENNEN
ME
010
No
Eau
-11
NW&NOME
0
M
MEN
=I
H
M
=I
9
Ml
EMEN
ENO
MIMMONIM
0
MEN
MEN
M
MOMMEMEMME
0211180
-
11WAINK-12
W-MEMMEMMMEM
0
No
10MMEMMEMN-111pol
No
MMMEMMMEMOMMEMM
ME
MMMMMMMMMMOMM
N
M
ow
W
INTENSUS
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
P.O. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 (206) W8-7&U
(zk
PROJEC IC120 Ve 5f I //?'I f PAGE
kOJECT No. 07, 27,04,
DATE 12 BY
M
LA
-7-4—
at
i 7
DAVOD a NO JOHNSON RESMENU
C97Y W MHOND5
MYAOMONG WALL DMOGN
ONTENSUS9,
PC NOX 940L, MONOMER, %VA V0290
W23) MO-M@321 * 090) 699-7m
Dave & Inge Johnson Residence
RETAINING WALL DESIGN 07.2704.04 11/8/97
Wc (unit weight of concrete) 160
lb/cu.ft
Ws (unit weight of soil) 120
lb/cu.ft
Fs (factor of safety) 2
a (depth of footing) 1
feet
b (width of wall) 0.67
feet
c (width of heel) 0.75
feet
H (height of wall, including footing 4
f eet
L (width of footing) 3
feet
r (center of wall from toe)
x (unit weight of concrete/weight of wall)
Pw (pressure from wall)
Ps (pressure from soil)
Pr (resultant center of pressure from toe)
Soils internal friction angle, 34 degrees
PW [(b) (H-a) + (L) (a)] Wc
Pw 908.8 lb/ft
Ps [(c) (H-a)] Ws
Ps 360 1 b/ft
SOLVE FOR Pr
Offset 0.28125 feet (Ps/2)(11Wc)(1/H)
r 1.96875 feet from toe
X 0. 1666667 feet toward toe from center of wal I
Pr 1.8020833 feet from toe
Pr is 0.3'from the center
of the middle third of the footing
EARTH PRESSURE
Ps soil 360 lbs Ph = Pstsin friction ang Ph 643.77682 lbs
P = 737.5965 lbs
RESISTANCE TO SLIDING, Rs
Rs = (Pw+Ps)/(Ph) should be greater than 1.5
Rs 1.9708693
Overturning Moment 858.3691
Righting Moment 2286.4833 2.663753 greater than 2.0 ok
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION e=Resultant Pressure eccentricity; (U2)-r
Pheel ((Pw+Ps)/A)*(1+6e/L) e -0.46875
Pheel 26.433333
Ptoe = ((Pw+Ps)/A)*(1-6e/L)
Ptoe = 819.43333 Less than 2000 psf bearing value, ok
Intensus, Engineering & Surveying, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291 ,
Johnson Residence/07.2704.04/11/10/97 2
OVERTURNING DUE TO FREEZE
Assume 700 16/lin foot at top of wall
Overturning Moment 2800 ft-lb/ft
REINFORCING STEEL
Ts*= 24000(As) 2800 A-lb/ft
As 0. 1166667 sq in
dia (As(4/pi))Al /2 diameter 0.385414 inches
#3: 0.375 in dia; A = 0. 1104 sq in
#4: 0.500 in dia; A = 0.1963 sq in
Vertical Use number 4 bars at 18" on center
Horizontal Use number 4 bars at 12" on center
wrk\int\prj\07.2704.04\retwall
1
Intensus, Engineering & Surveying, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291
I
4 �PIj
-3
dxft7ll , w7h
Ao( COMMA"
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL V�
scale: �-e` - P-0 "
Cmaeft dW be Cim 3000 * w*ah)d mix h wcm6ve wfth Socdm 6-02
WSDOT Stwdwd SPodfica&XA 19M RWnft'dV St" dW bG Grmb 40-
E,
17G58
IWAL
PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLMILDIME -q
PFJOJECT NAME:-,—lc)kVS&(-N NOV 2PILAWCHECK #:q-�- —Im
PROJECT ADDRESS: ToJ66+ RECEIPT DATE:t$)o I Cl
E IEWED
B F(MMAI/Date)
PLAN.
WATER
COMMENTS
FIRE -riBLDG.
SEWER
STREET
... EN .
Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment
—
Conditional Use Permit
ADB Requirements
2
3
Other Zoning Requirements
4
5
6
Underground Wiring Required
Lot Slope 15%
SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit
/U
.......
.7
Tree Cutting Plan
Plat/Subdivision Requirements
. . . . . . .
Legal Description Verification
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,
. . . . . . . . . . lt�
10.
Quit Claim/Street Dedications
Easements - Public/Private
-:0M 30
12
Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee
Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee
Drainage Plan (On -Site)
14
1A
Setback - Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses
... . .. ........
1 6
Setback - Storm Drain Line
-
1-7
Open Ditch - Existing
. . . . . . . . . . . .
18.
Culvert Required
. . . . . . . . . . .
.---19
Culvert Size
Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff
Catch Basin Required
Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
22
Sidewalk Required
Curb & Gutter Required
NO
Curb Cut For Driveway Required
2 6
Street Paving Required
. . . . . . . . . Ajo
26:,�
Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required
. . . . . . . . . ...
... - -
Street Name Sign Required
NO
29
Other Signing Required
.,30
Bond Required For Public Improvements
FEMA Map Check/Water Table
....
....
-3.2
Sid6 Sewer Mailability
M g t7�-
Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID #
RIO
... -34--
Create Street File
- ------------
.......... . . . . . . . . . . . '89,
..., . . . . . . . "5/4
-...
5
36
Existing Water Main Size
Water Meter Size
37.,
Service Line Size
. . .
Water Meter Charge Required
Vq
.
760 ..........
Hydrant Required
4 0
Hydrant Size Existing
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........
4f-.
Fire Line Charge Required - Sprinkler
Street Cut
4F
. . . . . . . . .
/V
IMiscellaneous
I'M
j�l
.
�
Reviewed By:
FIRE
NNfNG
EN&INE)ERING P C K
7 NOV 9 1
PUBUG WORKS DEPT,
R E C 0 R D OF C 0 N T A C T S
1
21
2
22
3
23
4
24
5
25
6
26
7
27
8
28
RW PERMIT # DATE ISSUED RECEIPT #
9
29
10
30
-11
31
12
32
�3
14-
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
PAID $ RECEIPT # DATE
33
.34
SS PERMIT # DATE ISSUEDY/---!� RECEIPT #
15
35-
16
36
17
37
METER SIZE3/L/- -PAID $ �4-0,-5�'DATE�//�-??/RECEIPT #
18
38
7
19.
39
26
40
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98M - (425) 771 FAX (425) 771 -=1
I Websfte: wwwxi.edmondsma-us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Diannin 0 n"ileiin 0 r-n inflarin
.1,4c A011, 2003
Snohomish County Assessors Office
3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 510
Everett, WA 98201
Re: Address Change for 17000 & 17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds Wa.
The owners of the above properties have requested their addresses be changed and the City
of Edmonds has reviewed and approved this request. Please update your records'to re;flect
these changes. Thank you.
17000 Talbot Road is now 17160 Talbot Road
17002 Talbot Road is now 17150 Talbot Road
Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
A169d
Lam Palmatter
Development Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
425.771.0220 p
425.771.0221f
Palmatigt@ci.edmonds.wa.us
CC: Street file �City of Edmonds)
Dave and Inge Johnson; 17002 Talbot Road
Incorporated August 11, 1890
C;.+— 1.+,. LJ-1,;- - - T- - - -
Message
Page 1 of 1
PaInIgktier, Lara
From: Palmatier, Lara
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 8:37 AM
To: 'Dave Johnson'
Cc: W estfall, John; Smith, Mike; Obrien, Suzanne; Burke, Denise; Cunningham, Diane; Intern, P; DST
Subject: RE: Address concern
This is to inform you that your address change request has been approved by the Building
Official. I wilt inform Police, Fire, Utility Billing and Snohomish County. Please note it is
your responsibility to inform the Post Office and anyone else you would like to have this
information. The changes are as follows:
17000 Talbot Road is now 17160 Talbot Road
17002 Talbot Road is now 17150 Talbot Road
Thank you. Please feet free to contact me with any questions. I wilt forward a copyof the
letter to Snohomish County to you,for your records today. Thanks again.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Johnson (mailto:daveinge@attbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Palmatier, Lara
Subject: RE: Address concern
Thank you
----- Original Message -----
From: Palmatier, Lara (mailto:paimatier@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:46 PM
To: 'daveinge@attbi.com'
Subject: Address concern
Hello, your email was forwarded to me regarding your address concerns. Our
Building Official, Jeannine Graf is back in the office on Tuesday April 8th and I win
talk to her about it ASAP and see what we can do. I have a letter to you from 1998
wherein the City is requesting all the surrounding houses request address changes as
well to rectify the larger address issue in your neighborhood. I win have your email
and this letter at that meeting and contact you ASAP with the outcome. Thank you
for your inquiry.
Lara Paimatier, LMP.
Deveiopment Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Phone 425.771.0220.1703
Fax 425.771.0221
4/11/2003
0
Message
Page I of 2
/1/03
Graf, Jeannine
Fi6m: Palmatier, Lara
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Chave, Rob
Cc: Graf, Jeannine
Subject: RE: Address
V
ve
0
We wrote a letter in 1998 telling him what he needed to do to get his and his neighbors
addresses changed. If we are going to go outside of procedure, someone higher than me
needs to direct me. You can see the letter if you would like but per Jeannine, since there is
a bigger addressing problem in that whole area, several neighbors need to change too. We
asked Mr. Johnson to solicit his neighbors in 1998 to request all are changed and rectify the
whole problem. That never happened. I can talk to Jeannine on Tuesday and see what her
decision is. Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Chave, Rob
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Palmatier, Lara; Bullis, Ann
Subject: FW: Address
Can one of you guys help this fellow? Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Johnson [mailto:daveinge@atthi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 12:58 PM
To: chave@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Subject: Address
Dear Mr. Chave,
I don't know if you are the one that I should be contacting. If not, you can probably let me know whom to
contact. We live on Talbot Road, just south o . f 171 st S.W. Our address is 17002 Talbot Road. It should be
171— or 172—Talbot Road because, again, we are south of 171st and since the addresses run south from
Everett, we should have a number higher than 171. When we built our home five years ago we asked the
city to give us a 171 address, but they refused because they said that Edmonds is on a grid system and
our address should be 17002. (if that is true, then 171 st should not be 171 st, but 170th or 169th.) Anyway,
on two occasions before we asked for the change, the Lynnwood Fire Department (who covers our area)
could not find homes — 17000 Talbot Road and 16920 Talbot Road. Just as we were asking for the
change, again the Fire Department could not find 17000 Talbot Road. Last Sunday, our neighbor at 16920
Talbot Road had a serious heart attack, serious enough that the Fire Department told his wife that two or
three minutes longer and he would have passed away. The first response medical unit from L nnwood -
y
again was lost even though they were told during the 911 call to take a left on Talbot Road from 171 st, not
a right. When the Medic 7 unit arrived we had someone on the road to direct them. The fire department
said that at least six of us are going to need to change our addresses. Is there a way to get the process
going before something else happens? (When we tried this first time, someone in the Edmonds
Developmental Services told us that they do not communicate with the fire department on such matters.
Let's hope things have changed.) Thank you.
Dave Johnson
17002 Talbot Road
Edmonds, WA 98026
4/7/2003
Palmatier, Lara
From: Pahnatier, Lara
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:46 PM
To: 'daveinge@attbi.com'
Subject: Address concem
Hello, your email was forwarded to me regarding your address concerns. Our Building Official, Jeannine
Graf is back in the office on Tuesday April 8th and I will talk to her about it ASA-P and see what we can
do. I have a letter to you from 1998 wherein the City is requesting all the surrounding houses request
address changes as well to rectify the larger address issue in your neighborhood. I will have your email and
this letter at that meeting and contact you ASAP with the outcome. Thank you for your inquiry.
Lara Palmatier, LMP
Development Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Phone 425.771.0220.1703
Fax 425.771.0221
Message
Page I of 1
Palmatier, Lara
From: Chave, Rob
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Palmatier, Lara; Bullis, Ann
Subject: FW: Address
Can one of you guys help this fellow? Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Johnson [mailto:daveinge@attbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 12:58 PM
To: chave@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Subject: Address
Dear Mr. Chave,
I don't know if you are the one that I should be contacting. If not, you can probably let me know whom to contact.
We live on Talbot Road, just south of 171 st S.W. Our address is 17002 Talbot Road. It should be 171 — or 172—
Talbot Road because, again, we are south of 171st and since the addresses run south from Everett, we should
have a number higher than 171. When we built our home five years ago we asked the city to give us a 171
address, but they refused because they said that Edmonds is on'a grid system and our address should be
17002. (if that is true, then 171st should not be 171st, but 170th or 169th.) Anyway, on two occasions before we
asked for the change, the Lynnwood Fire Department (who covers our area) could not find homes — 17000 Talbot
Road and 16920 Talbot Road. Just as we were asking for the change, again the Fire Department could not find
17000 Talbot Road. Last Sunday, our neighbor at 16920 Talbot Road had a serious heart attack, serious enough
that the Fire Department told his wife that two or three minutes longer and he would have passed away. The first
response medical unit from Lynnwood again was lost even though they were told during the 911 call to take a left
on Talbot Road from 171st, not a right. When the Medic 7 unit arrived we had someone on the road to direct
them. The fire department said that at least six of us are going to need to change our addresses. Is there a way
to get the process going before something else happens? (When we tried this first time, someone in the
Edmonds Developmental Services told us that they do not communicate with the fire department on such
matters. Let's hope things have changed.) Thank you.
Dave Johnson
17002 Talbot Road
Edmonds, WA 98026
425-774-3560
daveinge@aftbi.com
4/1/2003
Address concern
Page I of I
PaWatier, Lara
From: Dave Johnson [daveinge@attbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:10 PIVI
To: Palmatier, Lara
Subject: RE: Address concern
Thank you -
----- Original Message -----
From: Palmatier, Lara (mailto:paimatier@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:46 PM
To: 'daveinge@attbi.com'
Subject: Address concern
Hello, your email was forwarded to me regarding your address concerns. Our Building
Official, Jeannine Graf is back in the office on Tuesday April 8th and I will talk to her about
it ASAP and see what we can do. I have a letter to you from 1998 wherein the City is
requesting all the surrounding houses request address changes as well to rectify the. larger
address issue in your neighborhood. I will have your email and this letter at that meeting
and contact you ASAP with the outcome. Thank you for your inquiry.
Lara Palmatier, LMP
Development Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
Phone 425.771.0220.1703
Fax 425.771.0221
4/l/2003
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX �425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
1'7c-AM�1,2003
Snohomish County Assessors Office
3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 510
Everett, WA 98201
Re: Address Change for 17000 & 17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds Wa.
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
The owners of the above properties have requested their addresses be changed and the City
of Edmonds has reviewed and approved this request. Please update your records to reflect
these changes. Thank you.
17000 Talbot Road is now 17160 Talbot Road
17002 Talbot Road is now 17150 Talbot Road
Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Lira Palmader
Development Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
425.771.0220 p
425.771.0221 f
Pabnatiergci.edmonds.wa.us
CC: Street file (City of Edmonds)
Dave and Inge Johnson; 17002 Talbot Road
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citv - Hekinan. Jaoan
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: www.d.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
-1,4 C -A$�1,2003cl"""y u "�j "Y"r't;l"y
Snohomish County Assessors Office
3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 510
Everett, WA 98201
Re: Address Change for 17000 & 17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds Wa.
The owners of the above properties have requested their addresses be changed and the City
of Edmonds has reviewed and approved, this request. Please update your records to reflect
these changes. Thank you.
17000 Talbot Road is now 17160 Talbot Road
17002 Talbot Road is now 17150 Talbot Road
Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
) � ) e�-*
Lara Palmatier
Development Services Coordinator
City of Edmonds
425.771.0220 p
425.771.0221 f
Pahnatier@ci.edmonds.wa.us
CC: Street file (City of Echnonds)
Dave and Inge Johnson; 17002 Talbot Road
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Citv - Hekinan. Jat)an
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH �DMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-02�6 FAX (425) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works e Planning/Building e Parks and Recreation Engineering e Wastewater Treatment Plant
C.
April 20,1998
David and Inge Johnson
21221 Cypress Way
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7936
Re: request for address change from 17002 Talbot Road
In response to your letter requesting an address change for your future residence;
the City agrees there is an existing addressing problem in your area. The City
would be interested in rectifying' the problem completely rather than changing one
address which would leave the some problem for the other residence(s) in the area.
Since it is our policy that addresses may only be changed upon written request by
owners we recommend that you.solicit your neighbors west of Talbot road (7921,
7931,16920,16926,17000,17004,17006,17120,.17122,17126 and 17140) to write
to the City for address changes. The City would most likely respond by changing all
of the addresses to 171XX numbers.
Note, if and when this happens, the number given to your house would most likely
not be 17150, as you proposed, since the corresponding numbers. across the street
are substantially smaller. I am sorry that we were unable to meet your request
immediately, however, the address change is still possible and desired by the City
subject to agreement from all affected properties. Thank you for your inquiry.
Lara Knaak
Permit Coordinator
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 9
Sister Citi es International — Hekinan, Japan
City of Edmonds
Community Services - Planning Division
250 - 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Sirs,
21221 Cypress Way
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7936
April 13, 1998
RECEIVED
APR 15 1998
PLANNING DEPT.
We request a change in address for our new home now being built on Talbot Road. The
address assigned to us is 17002 Talbot Road. This address relates to the addresses of the
houses to the west, south and northwest of our new home. However it does not relate to
other homes on Talbot Road, nor to where our home is located from 17 1 st S.W. These
homes have 17 1 -- addresses because they are south of 171 st - S.W. As we have started
building, a great majority of the construction workers and construction trucks have turned
right at j unction of 17 1 st S.W. and Talbot Road because that is the way the 17000
numbers should be. Accordingly, we realize that this could be a problem in people
finding our new home with the 17002 address. We, therefore, request a 17 1 -- address,
such as 17150 Talbot Road.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
5
Sincerely,
Z9..J1r,
a
David C. Jo son
Inge Johns'on
BOLDING
APR 16 1998
7—Ai-i3o-r goA&
(o
A,, 7-ALSOT ROAD
A,D,O lz 6:5-5 r= 5 -
0
ol
0,
00
CP
STREET FILE
I;
SJUILDIN
Nov 2 0 '1997
DAVID AND INGE JOHNSON RESIDENCE, CITY OF EDMONDS
INTENSUS, ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PO BOX 1486, SNOHOMISH, WA 98291
The contents of this report include:
OVERVIEW .
JOHNSON RESIDENCE
17002 Talbot Road
Edmonds, WA
Critical Areas Checklist;
Storm Detention Calculation;
Earthwork Calculation; and,
Retaining Wall Design.
Storm detention volume is calculated using the standard City of Edmonds worksheet. Total
impervious area proposed by this project is 3970 square feet which includes the residence,
driveway from the private drive, and the patio area proposed on the west side of the residence.
Earthwork calculations include residential excavation and excavation necessary to construct the
retaining walls.
Retaining wall design is for three foot high walls constructed on a three foot wide by one foot
deep footing. The wall is to have temperature steel and reinforcing steel for external loading due
to freezing as noted in the analysis.
wrk\int\pd\07270404\ovrview
InWnsus, Engineering & Survqing, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291 * 425-481-7282 * 360-668-7534
41, C. 1 B911
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 o (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works o Planning! Building o Parks and Recreation o Engineering o Wastewater Treatment Plant
9/12/97
David C & Ingeborg Johnson
21221 Cypress Way
Lynnwood, WA 98036-7936
Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist #97-179
Dear Applicant:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted. The "DETERMINATION" reached by the City is
located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page).
It is very important for you to retain a copy of this Critical Areas Checklist "DETERMINATION" for your records.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION TO BE NOTED:
PLEASE EXAMINE THIS" DETERMINATION" FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. YOU MAY NEED TO SUBMIT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS OR CRITICAL AREAS —STUDY.
The 'DETERMINATION' for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination not a
project -specific detbrni1nation.
00, You must sqbmIta copy of the CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLISTand DETERMINATION WITH ALL -4a
PERMIT APPLICATIONS or YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.
Permit applications include the following:
Building Permits
Conditional Use Permits
Subdivisions
Variances
;.,,Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications
2 Any other development permit applications.
Thank you.
Diane Cunningham'
.Planning Secretary
Enc: Critical Areas Determinatioh
Architectural Nsign Boad'
C:Receotion\,Iarfi�CRLTK.doc.,":'�,,'t�
Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Siste:Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
7 " - - / I-",
Cltv nf Ftimnintic
J.
SEP 1
CRITICAL AREAS CHECAMAST"i-.
Fhe Critical Areas Checklist contained oil this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Develolinient Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her SUbmittal of a development
permit to tile City.
The 1)U1-1)O.SC Of tile Checklist is to criable City staff to
determirie whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
inay be.
, present oil the subject property. The
inforination needed to complete the Checklist should
be c,,isily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
inal)s, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please SLibi-nit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have cornpleted,the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Oi�-ncr/Applicant:
David C-& Ingeborg Johnson
Name
21221 Cypress Way
Street Address
Lynnwood WA 98036-7936-
City State Zip
(425) 774-3560 Fax: (425) 778-5584
Telephone
Signature
September 11, 1997
Date
creception\janaked.doc
Applicant Representative: -e
Name
Street Address
City State
Telephone
Signature
Date
Zip
(over)
CA I-ILE
Critical Areas Checklist
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: 17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds
2. Property Tax Account Number: 172704-1-073-0008
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 12,028 Sq. Feet
4. Is this site currently developed? _ yes; X no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all. that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
X golling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical
rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over
a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: No _; Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: No Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway—Ao floodplain No of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are
year-round? No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow J shrubs _; mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No
-------------------- — -------------- - For City.Staff Use Only - --------
1� Site i's Zoned? 57
SCS.h1ap ped, soil typq(s)?
Wettand inve'nt**Qry.or-C-A. : a dicateswie'dand present on s i te?
in pin
al Area oi
I site?
4. Areas: in.yen.t6iy or.C.A. map indicates Critic
5; Site, witliin design.ated.eartli subsidence jalidslideliazard arezi?
6. Si te, desi' ted on theInvironmentally Sensitiv.eAreas Map?.
gria
DETERMINATION
^ca_chk.doc; Rev 02/11/97
P10
. riner
a
DAVID a ONC99 JOHNSON RESIDENCE
(CgTy OF EDMONDS
STORM DETENTION (CALCULATION
r
0
rvlote
IV
EXPMES
ONTMUSD 9MCDONERONS a SURVEYONS
pa WX 94@6D WA V9299
W= 4@0-72@2 * 390) (960-724
Table 1 — Detention Pipe Sizes
Impermeable
Required
Area Sq. Ft.
Vol Cu Ft
2000
50
2500
62
3000
75
3500
87
4000
100
4500
112
5000
125
Note: Allowable Pipe Materials:
Impermeable
Area Sa. Ft.
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Pipe Diameter,
1511 1811 2411 3011
40
28
16
.10
50
35
20
13
60
42
24
15 Required pipe
70
49
28
18 length in feet
80
56
32
21
90
63
36
23
100
70
40
25
Reinforced Concrete
Aluminized Steel
Aluminum
CMP Asphalt Coated
N — 12 ADS (Not permitted on roads)
Table 2 — Outlet Orifice Sizes
Outlet Orifice Diameter (Inches)
5/8
5/8
3/4
3/4
7/8
7/8
7/8
Table 3 — Rectangular Catch Basin Requirements
Detention
Max. size
Catch Basin
pipe diameter
knockout
Type
< 18"
2011
Type 1, CB 15
18" to 24"
2611
Type IL, CB, 16
24" to 36"
3611
Type 11, CB 19 19 (48" Basin)
36" to 42 13
42u
Type 11, CB 19 19 (54' Basin)
*Source: Assoc. Sand
& Gravel Co. Standards
In
5
Revised 3/16/95
STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTEM
WORKSHEET
OWNER le-11,7 (der
�24 CALC BY:
ADDRESS ryw'-els /4/ay PHONE: 4-"5-4(9L7Y92
A/4. _,9910-4% DATE: wo
*****DESIGN DATA*****
IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE
92 719
.1,9 7L
FINISHED G W DETENTION PIPE LENGTH
�t"Or r4L MINIMUM
P I',
kATUNRE�EP&NCfOP OF
E! OUTLET
CONC BOX OR RISER
Sx To rl SLOPE
-OUTLET CONTROL
'�JMIN.
UPPER CATCH BASIN ORIFICE
CONTROL CATCH BASIN
CROSS SECTION
2'X2'X6' DEEP, 4-6' SPALLS OR EQUAL
FROM CONTROL CB
12'X 2'X 3' DEEP, 3/4' CRUSHED ROCK XISTING GRADE
S
FR LET W
FR13M CONTROL OUTLET WAS D R07CV
"0 TFL13W TRCNC MIN 10' LdNG,
t_5' P RF PIPE TO A LEVEL
PIPE W/ END CAPS
TR SMALL LINED WITH MIRAFI
PRJN
AIPRAP OUTLEr OJH To PLACKEN F W . ASHED . DRAIN ROCK
�—SPREADER- TRENCH
FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT -BE CONNECTED' YO DETENTION SYSTEM
NOTES.-
1. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline and detention system inspection
before backfilling and for final inspections. APPROVED BY
2, Responsibility for operation -and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the 11
responsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the -storage pipe must be flushed
out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. Ile outlet control orifice DATE
muqt he lamt nnpn at all f;mAc
DAVOD a ONV92 JOHNSON R002NCE
COTY OF EDMONDS
EARTHWORK CALCULATOON
L Bo
vi
17658
AL
EXPIRES jt*^Z/V�%jM I - I
onumsuso
PC BOX MCI smamomosmo WA WN)o
(423) 4Q-7202 * 0(90) M-704
INTENSUS
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
P.O. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 (206) 668-7534
a#,rl rr /-/ /
PROJE __2�9aVe�llllf 1-1-1/00VI —PAGE 2
PROJECT No. -97, 27,14(04(
DATE vs //, 17 7 BY
ONE
EMOMMEMMEMMEMOM
MEN
MMMOO.".j
NEW.-Iffir
OMEN
MEMMMME
MONO
EMENOMME
MONO
MOMMOMMIN
MEMNON
MEMMOMOM
mommom
,..on
I
l!§MMMMMMMMMMM
MENEEMENEEMMEMEMMEM
mommmem,
MENNEN
M
EMMEME
MEMENNIOME
H196121
MEN
low
MOMMEM
ON
M
mmmmmmmmmmm
No
No
MENEM
M
0
memo
MIENEM
0
NOMMEMMOM
WaREMMMOM
SON
MM
mis'llm
MONO
Em
00,00MM
MOMM
I
N
M
NI.
flio
mmmem
HEM
EMEN
MMMMMMINNHEMEIM
0
MEMOMMEMMOMEMM
MEMMOMMOM
MONSOON
commommmmmomm
MOMMEN
ME)ANO
MEN
NONE
EM
MINEEM
OMEN
NNE
IWOME
IMMMEMM
MENNEN
mmmmmm
mmal
MIENNEW
MEMNON
Emmommmass.
=a
0
MMOMMONMENN
MENNEN
ON
M
0
M
EMMONS
ME
1
0
mmmmmmmmmm
M
INTENSUS PROJECT 0011.6 PAGE
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
RO. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 (206) 668-7534
C. A-� A, --n OK-) -
PROJECT No. 64 7, 2 704. L14
DATE BY
j
�"n '6'
M
MEN
M
0
MIEN
MMEME
MEMMEEM
M
MMEEM
0
IMZ-
M
MEN
ON
ON
0
0
0
KURE
M
=12m,
me
Num
0
M
No
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMOMMEMEMN
MEN
ON
0
IN
ONE
0
0
0
NIXON
MMMMMMM�
ME
M,
HERON
0
MEESE
No
so
ON
ME
No
M
No
M
ON
NNE
El
w
Irl
MEMO
WISH
MEM
No
No
MEMO
��wllm
No
ME
MEMO
INN
0
M
M
Ml
F1111KIN
W-MEN
M
MMIN
0
No
M
MOEN
MMMMMMMMM
0
mom
INTENSUS
PROJECT 49OVe f'117,18 k-1W*Jd17 PAGE
1-2
ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
P.O. Box 1486 - Snohomish, WA 98291
(206) 481-7282 (206) 668-7534
Q A, \.fA-,-ib 13
PROJECT No. a7, 2744,d
DATE //0 V - //, 12 �Z By
MOMMEMOM
ME
MMMNMMMMMMMM
ONE
MEN
SHIMMMOMMME
MEN
MEMMMOMMEM
0
MMMMMMMMMMMMMM
NMMMMMMMMMM
M
IMMMOMMEMOMMMM01
MENEM
mom
EMMOMEMMM
ON
MOMEME
NNE
MMOMMEN'r
, 51
OEM
MENEM
M
MONSON
MEEN
mmmor-falm
0
MMMMKwNjM
M
MMEMOMMEMME
0
MMMMMMMMMMN
NONE
mom
MMNMMMMMMMMMM
MENEM
MEN
0
MMMMMMMMMMN
EMME
0
mom
0
0
MESMERISM
MEN
0
ME
MMMMMMMMMMMMMM
ME
MENEM
ME
MMNMMMMMMMMMMME
ME
NOON
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMI
M
ME
ME
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
No
EMMMEM
0
ON
MMIMMM
MINE
MOMMOMMI
MENEM
mom
INMMM
MENEM
EMEMMIMMEMMMEMEMM
MEMEMEMN
No
OEM
MENEM
MENEM
ME
N
No
MMOOMMOMMOMM
mom
0
ON
MEMMEMEMEN
M
NNE
0
MMMMMMMMMMMMMIM
DAW90 a ONC92 JOHNSON RoommU
c9TY (OF EDMONDS
ft�TAgNgNCD WALL DMGN
omygmsugg
(pa nox 0409.9
(423) 403-m@2 * 040) (9N-7m
Dave & Inge Johnson Residence
RETAINING WALL DESIGN 07.2704.04 11/8/97
Wc (unit weight of concrete) 160
lb/cu.ft
Ws (unit weight of soil) 120
lb/cu.ft
Fs (factor of safety) 2
a (depth of footing) 1
feet
b (width of wall) 0.67
feet
c (width of heel) 0.75
feet
H (height of wall, including footing 4
feet
L (width of footing) 3
feet
r (center of wall from toe)
x (unit weight of concrete/weight of wall).
Pw (pressure from wall)
Ps (pressure from soil)
Pr (resultant center of pressure from toe)
Soils internal friction angle, 34 degrees
Pw [(b) (H-a) + (L) (a)] Wc
Pw 908.8 lb/ft
Ps [(c) (H-a)] Ws
Ps 360 lb/ft
SOLVE FOR Pr
Offset 0.28125 feet (Ps/2)(1/Wc)(1/1-1)
r 1.96875 feet from toe
X 0. 1666667 feet toward toe from center of wal I
Pr 1.8020833 feet from toe
Pr is 0.3'from the center of the middle third of the footing
EARTH PRESSURE
Ps soil 360 lbs Ph = Pstsin friction ang Ph 643.77682 lbs
P = 737.5965 lbs
RESISTANCE TO SLIDING, Rs
Rs = (Pw+Ps)/(Ph) should be greater than 1.5
Rs = 1.9708693
Overturning Moment 858.3691
Righting Moment 2286.4833
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
Pheel ((Pw+Ps)iA)*(1+6e/L)
Pheel 26.433333
Ptoe = ((Pw+Ps)/A)*(1-6e/L)
Ptoe = 819.43333
2.663753 greater than 2.0 ok
e=Resultant Pressure eccentricity; (U2)-r
e -0.46875
Less than 2000 psf bearing value, ok
Intensus, Engineering & Surveying, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291
Johnson Residence/07.2704.04/11/10/97
2
OVERTURNING DUE TO FREEZE
Assume 700 lb/lin foot at top of wall
Overturning Moment 2800 ft-lb/ft
REINFORCING STEEL
Ts 24000(As) 2800 ft-lb/ft
As 0. 1166667 sq in
dia (As(4/pi))Al /2 diameter 0.385414 inches
#3: 0.375 In dia; A = 0.1104 sq in
#4: 0.500 in dia; A = 0.1963 sq in
Vertical Use number 4 bars at 18" on center
Horizontal Use number 4 bars at 12" on center
wrk\int\prj\07.2704.04\retwall
Intensus, Engineering & Surveying, PO Box 1486, Snohomish, WA 98291
-N
8T
44?
A4 0 140
if I (m1h)
$0
�5�7
po do
0
WA
,Ul
z 1-0"
. -kzo�,
I
11, -wecki.
wllh
OV C0,71MAWS
0
CONCRETE RETAINING WALL Tll�
Seale: a #.Ott
Cave% ohd be Cbm 3000 * &**W mb, In woordivm wfth Secdon 6-02
WSDOT SWxford Aw*ador^ IM ftWaft StoW " be Gab 4a
CITY OF EDMONDS
8 go 1 9
Address of Construction: 1-200c!9,
Property Legal Description (Include all easements):
Owner and/or Contractor:
State License No.
. 7
—1-),n , / e-
1?,E5 `90 Yz>
tl�Rni T1
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
PERM IT 8 9 2 G
t
Single Family
El Multi -Family (No. of Units-)
E3 Commercial,
El Public
je�e�
ee�
AVH
PUBLIC WORKS DE21
Building Permit No. q7(9q 9
Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No 11 Yes
RW Construction Permit No.
Cross other Private Property - No C3 Yes,
X
Attach legal description, and.copy of recorded easement
I certify that I have read and All comply with all city requirements
as indicated on the back of the Permit Card.
.olq
Date
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION
OFFlCE'.'USE'.ADNLY::,
FOR INSPECTION CALL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
Permit Fee: (!�o Issued By
Trunk Charge. Date Issued:
Assessment Fee: Receipt No.:
Lid No.:
Partial Inspection: Date -Initial -
Comments
Reason Rejected: Date.Initial-
Final Inspection Approved: Date -Initial
** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE **
White Copy: File Gieen Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant
Revised 3190
0
The City of Edmonds
Side Sewer Drawing
EASEMENT NO . ......................................... — '
NEW CONSTRUCTION 2- REPAIRS F-1 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ...................... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR 4-,
............ V .. ro.r7 ... tv.41,6mPERMIT NO.
JOB ADDRESS ....... 0 0 ;2 — 7-4146., / Xcl.
.................................. ............... ........................... LEGAL WAIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
'KT A IOCC nC A 7'%TlTrTl-%7,T
.... 0.0- 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
or 8l.ejr W0.0
or
Thti winrrn�ltion zii--
Th�
-,�ss not V---
-t orlh on i:it;
r
i7ic:-.,ding, but
i `-ch sc-mer stcbs
;t Edmonct
givIln on li-its
.,.n A Map-
_!W
Approved:
POVW-000 1 -11/75 (REV. 11/78) DATE-77.A.Y—.9.19 ............... B
. . .................................
I N T E N S U S
ENGINEERING * SURVEYING
15425 BROADWAY AVENUE S.E.
P.O. BOX 1486 - SNOHOMISH, WA 98291
(425) 481-7282 - (360) 668-7534
October 21, 1998
James C. Walker, PE
City Engineer
City of Edmonds, WA
re: Curbing On Private Drive
Chester Johnson Short Plat
File S-95-129
Intensus File 07.2704.04
RECEIVED
OCT 2 1 1998
ENGINEERING
RECEIVED
OCT 2 1 1998
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Dear Jim:
Thickened edge paving as depicted on the attached detail is an acceptable alternative to the
extruded curb called for on the plans approved February 21, 1997.
Please contact me if there are concerns regarding this alternative.
s7z
e -
Vern L. Bower, PE, PLS
encl.
+0
-0-, tv7 U/,
�4
7
intensive 0 thorough 0 detailed 0 complete
17002 Talbot Road
Edmonds, WA 98026-5052
October 17, 1998
R 1,2'C E FV E D
James Walker, City Engineer
City of Edmonds OCT 1'998
121 - 5th Ave. N. E N G dVII E`-ER II N G
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Mr. Walker,
We wish to ask for two changes in our storm detention and access drive improvement plans. The first
has to do with our ACCess Drive.Improvement plan This plan has a project number of 07.2704.02 and
was signed by you on February 21, 1997. We wish to eliminate all of the extruded curbs and substitute
them with burms. The reasons for this have do mostly with the south side of the road. There are three
driveways coming off that side of the road. The feeling of our excavating contractor (Styren
Construction) and our paver (Harm's Paving) is that the burms would be a better idea. That way the
cars entering the driveways would just drive over the burms similar to a speed bump. On the north side
of the road, extruded curves would work, but the gentleman living in the house to the northeast of us
has a lawn on the west side of his house. The only way that he gets his riding lawranower to the lawn
is to drive down the road. It will be impossible for him to get over an extruded curb with the
lawnmower. The burms that have been on the south side of the road for years have worked well. With
the new storm detention system that we have installed, they will work even better. Hann's Paving has
some ideas of making a burm/speed bump system that will make the catch basins even more beneficial.
The second change we would like is to eliminate the catch basin that was supposed to be put in our
driveway. That catch basin was for project number 07.2704.04. 1 do not know when you approved it
but it was in late December 1997. Our plan is to have crushed rock in the area to the east of our
driveway, between the driveway and the retaining wall on the east side of our lot. We feel that with
crushed rock the area will drain fine. The water from the driveway will be carried to the new catch
basin near our house on the north side.
I appreciate your taking time to review these changes. We would like to complete this project just as
soon as possible. Our building permit expires in late December as well as $15,000 bond we have with
the City to compete this project.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Phone: (425) 774-3560
Fax: (425) 778-5584
David C. Jo son
419 .�-3 �ftbl
I
VON 7 4f ---------
hot#, a
l*ff
4W f Ab*A
JUN
N �U W'51 "JY Sly. 30
Air
A 7R1 ?1 -13 Re ShIchlre
lfi&tT
.41 1450 w
S7V IM 5hwt#r
7 711
zz
LOT
Itoll �f 1w;(A�dIM1,41r�1
N 45' If/
M.
Ilk 5f
PAR s
LOT I
Imm
APPLICATION
E
�-n
Uty of Edmondi for EASEMENT NO - ----- ......................................
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO. .!!��!17-.-ASMT. NO
OWNER .... ------ -------------------- CONTRACTOR
------------------------------------------------ -- - ----------------------------------------------------- --------------------- PERMIT NO.
JOB ADDRESS ---
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. .......... ---------- ------------ BLOCK NO. --- -------------------------------
'K7 A I NY? rNU A 7-%T-%T�VT�WT
G�- I
,-% OF- r= p
z4el-47
--- By ................. 7----
DATE
S
A145 'de
aW197s)w4l1
z
lxryp;col)
'ZINN
=196.d7
Ak_
19
mop S'w
95. 80
3 6. 95. /0
AM
IV
ee
11 _V"
N 45* Max
La w Y%.
0
07/11/97 09:21 Nov 2 0 1997
P .0004 Recorded
Snohomish County
ORIGINAL
COVER SHEET
Return Address
Kenneth E. Rekow
120.1 Third Avenue, #2900 UP)e
Seattle, WA 98101-j028
Please print or type information
Document Title(s) (or transactions contained herein): Quit Claim Deed
NOTE: Also corrects legal description found in earlier documents
Recording Nos. 9701090017 and 9702040167
Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released:
Additional reference numbers on page _ of document(s)
Grantor(s) (Last name first, then first name and initials: Johnson, Chester W. and
Johnson, Doris H.
Additional names on page _ of document.
Grantee(s) (Last name first, then first narne and initials: Johnson, David C and Johnson,
Inge
Additional names on page _ of document.
Legal description (abbreviated: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range)
Lot 2, City of Edmonds, Short Plat S-95-129
17002 Talbot koad, Edmonds, WA.
Additional legal is on page 4 of document(s).
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s) 172704-1-073-0008
The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on the form. The staff will not
read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the 'indexing information
provided herein.
0129851.01 / 21881-002
NO EXCISE TAX DUE
$2.00 Treasurer's Fee
�uire
JUL 0 o 1997
BOB DANTIN111116omish Coun� Trea re
QUIT CLAIM DEEL) B Y.
Deputy
THE GRANTORS, CHESTER W. JOHNSON and DORIS H. JOHNS4, husband
and wife, for and in consideration of love and affection, convey and quitclaim to
DAVID C. J(1`:..,*NSON and INGE JOHNSON, husband and wife, the following described
real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, together with all
after acquired title of the Grantors therein:
Lot 2, City of Edmonds Short Plat S-95-129, located at
17002 Talbot Road, Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington.
Said'real estate is more exactly described in Attachment A attached hereto
and by reference incorporated herein.
NOTE: Corrects legal description in earlier documents Recording No. 9701090017, dated
December 19, 1996, and Recording No. 9702040167, dated January 17, 1997.
DATED this 3 day of June, 1997.
CHESTER )K. JOHNS
DORIS H. JOHNSON
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF 8NOttOMISH)
On this day personally appeared before me CHESTER W'. JOHNSON and
DORIS 1-1. JOHNSON, to me known to be the individuals described and who executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they signed the same as their
free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
-2-
0129851.01 / 21881-002
9707110079
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 261 &—day of June, 1997.
JNC0MMw6EqM12-1"
0129851.01 / 21881-M
LLI-7 L4�� G' - L-S- 11
(printed name of notary)
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Z-1-?(--1L1111.rj--e--r1e�
My appointment expires `//..2 - ae
-3 -
9707110-079
ATTACHMENT A (as corrected)
LQI_Z. C11y_QUbM0ND3 4HORT PLATA-M_-Ul
That porilon of herein described Parcel A described as follows:
Commencing at the most easterly comer of herein described Parcel A; thence S 440 17' 08' W.
i00.00 feet; thence N 450 35'07" W. 163.50 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing N
450 35'07" W. 140.00 feet; thence N 440 24'53" E, 85.00 feet; thence S 450 35'07" E, 89.44
feet; thence S 640 05' 43" E, 15.75 feet; thence S 450 35'07' E, 35.62 feet-, thencie S 440 24' 53'
W. 90.00 feet to thi point of beginning.
Containing i2115 Ouare feet.
Subject to an easement for ingress, egmss and utiNies described as follows: Commencing at the
most northerly comer of Lot 2; thence S 450 42' 52" E, 89.44 feet to the point of boginning,
thetice S 640 05* 43' E. 15.75 feet to a point of cusp with a 25.76 foot radius Curve concave to
tha-56utnwest: thence northwestedy along said curve through a central angle of 130 32' 03-, 6.08
feet to a point of reverse curvature with a 44.76 foot radius curve concave to the northeast;
thence nontswesterly along said curve through a central angle of 330 10' 59'. 25.92 feet: thence
N 450 35' 07" VV. 5.00 feet-, thence N 440 24' 53" E, 5.00 feet to the northeast line of said Lot 2:
thence S 45C'35' Oi' E, along said northeast line, 20.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing i 00 Owe feet.
TOGETHER wilh an equal and undivided interest in Tract 999.
V �; U
That portion of Government Lots 2 and 3, Section 7. Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
described a§ folloWs:
Commencing at the east one -quarter comer of Section 7, Township 27 North, Range 4 East,
W.M.: thence along the east line of said Section 7, N 10 19'48" E. 437.35 feet: thence S 890 51'
33" W. 1013.86 feet to the most easterly comer of the tract herein described and the point of
beginning: thence N 450 35'07" W, 477.43 feet; thence along the Government Meander line In
said Section 7. S 460 10'44" W. 100.05 feet-, thence S 45'D 36 07* E, 480.51 feet; thence N
44024'53'E, 106.00 feet to the point of beginning:
EXCEPT the righi of way of Great Northern Railway.
TOGETHER with a strip of land 100 feet in length, lying immediately south and east of and
abutting the above described property and measuring in width from the southeasterly border of
said property to th6 centerline of Talbot Road.
TOGETHER with in easement for road purposes, water and power by Instrument reconjed Under
AF #8504290351, irecords of Snohomish County.
An ^
97071luu79
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO:
D. Huff
Gary
1201 Third Ave., Ste. 29o-u
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 2'23-1313
of
NEW&
Nov 2 0 1997
QUIT -CLAIM DEED
(Statutory Form)
THE GRANTOR(S) MARK G. BEARD AND OLETA J. BEARD, HUSBAND AND WIFE
, City of EDMONDS I
County of SNOHOMISH? - - Washington, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS
($10.00) AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION
convey— and quit -claim— to CHESTER W. JOHNSON AND DORIS H. JOHNSON,
HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THEIR HEIM, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
in the City of EDMONDS County of SNOHOMISH , State of WASHINGTON
NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS
%ND EGRESS OVER AND ACROSS THE TEN FOOT STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
That portion of Govt. Lots 2 & 3, Section 7, Township 27 north, Range 4 east
W.M. described as follows: BEGINNING at the east one quarter cor.ner of Sec. 7,
Township 27 north, Range 4 east, W.M. and proceeding thence along the east line
of said Section 7, north 1 '11 '45" east 437.35 THENCE west 1.013.66 feet
to the most southerly corner of the tract herei t )ed and the true point
- - TW
of the beginning. THENCE north 45043'10" west 185 f7erT
,C5 north 44016'50"
Past 10 feet; THENCE south 45043'10" east 185 feet; THENCE P AL'i 6'50" west
10 feet to point of beginning. y
situated in the County of SNOHOMISH State of Washinaton.
a
Dated this d a y o f 19 94.
XXXX
STATE OF WASHINGTON, I
County*of ss. . (Individual Acknowledgment)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
personally
do hereby certify that on this Z day of
appeared before me MARK G. BEARD and OLETA J. BEARD
to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument and
acknowledged that they - signed the same as their —free and voluntary act
and deed for the uses and pujqww4berein mentioned.
r
GIVEN UNDER MY H�eol�. OFFiNAL SEAL this dayof
19 94. Cj,.e N.
tAOTAR), 7,
0
- o'. My appointment expires:
P 10
B
Notary Public in and for th$ ;Q-4 as�4kt, psiding at —in said County.
4V
quit -Claim Deed (Statutory Form)
Washington Legal Blank Inc.. Issaquah. WA Form No. 289 8188
MATERIAL MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART IN ANY FORM WHATSOEVER.
r
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT This form is your mccipt when sta:
PLEASE SEE REVERSE by cashier.
Form No. 94 0001A
CHAPTER 82.45 RCW - CHAPTER 4SUI WAC
For Use at County Treasurer's Office
(Uw Form No. 84-OOOID ror Rcponing Transfcn of Controlling Interest of Entity Ownership to the Deporurient or Rc%lcnuc)
THIS AFFIDAVIrr WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS 1-7 ARE FULLY COMPLETED
Name MARK G. AND OLETA J. BEARD Name CHESTER W. AND DORIS H. JOHNSOI
HUSBAND AND WIFE HUSBAND AND WIFE AND THEIR HEII
SteeESSORS LID A00J.%JL�0
16920 TALBOT ROAD Street 17000TALBOT ROAD
Street
city EDMONDS, WA 9§A�6 Zip City EDMONDS State WA Zip 9 8 0:
[FA.DRESS TO SEND ALL PROPERTY TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE
Name QaMa'X=)zXX)M=XDV2=X1XX3UMM=
Street NO CWr0G -
City/Statc EDMONDS WA —Zip 98020
—1-022-0000
M LEGAL DESCRIl"TION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN 0 UNINCORPORATED SNOHOMI I Y El OR IN CITY OF
Street Address (if property is improved):
A NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER AND ACROSS THE TEN FOO'.
STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
That portion of Govt. Lots 2 & 3, Section 7, Township 27 north, Range 4
east W.M. described as follows: BEGINNING at the east one quarter corner
Sec. 7, Township 27 north, Range 4 east, W.M. and proceeding thence alongi
east line of said Section 7, north 1011'45" east 437.35 feet; THENCE west
1.013.66 feet to the most southerly corner of the tract (continued next pat
Is this property currently: YES NO
13 Description of tangible personal property if included in sale (furn;
Classified or designated as forest land? 0 91
appliances, ctc.)
Chapter 84.33 RCW
NONE
Classified as current use land (open space, farm C3 91
and agricultural, or timber)? Chapter 84.34 RCW
Exempt from property tax as a nonprofit
If cxempdon claimed, list WAC number and explanation.
organization? Chapter 84.36 RCW
Seller's Exempt Reg. No -- — — — — - — — —
WAC No. (Sec/Sub)
Receiving special valuation as historic
Explanation
property under? Chapter 84.25 RCW
Property Type: )<land only 0 land with new building
• land with previously used building Cl land with mobile home
Type of Document Quit Claim Deed
• timber only 0 building only
3/1/94
Principal Use: 0 Apt. (4 + unit) 0 residential
Date of Document
0 timber 0 agricultural 0 corruncrciallindustrial
Gross Sale Price $ -n-
Xother J)R1VF4J4Y 54F,eV1'V6- /?t-: S 10 &-VCA;5
Personal Property (deduct) $
Ta:-blc Sale Price S
(1) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE (RCW 94.33 or RCW 84.34)
Excise Tax State $
If the new owner(s) of land that is classified or designated as current use
Local $
or forest land wish to continue the classification or designation of such
land, the new owncr(s) must sign below. Ifthc new owncr(s) do not desire
Delinquent Interest: State $
to continue such classification or designation, all compensating or additional
Local $
tax calculated pursuant to RCW 84.31120 and 140 or RCW 84.34.108 shall
Delinquent Penalty: State $
beduc and payable by the sclIcrortransferorat thctimeofsale. The county
assessor must determine if the land transferred qualifics to continue
Total Due $
Classification or designation and must so indicate below. Signatures do
THERE IS A $2.00 FEE FOR PROCESSING THIS FORkf IF NO TAX IS DUE
no ! necessarily mean the land will remain in classification or designation'
if it no longer qualifics, it will be removed and the compensating taxes
0 AFFIDAVIT
will be applied. All new owners must sign.
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the stat
This land 0 does 0 does not qualify for continuance.
NVashington that the 6regoing is true and correct.
Date
Signature of
—
DEPUTY ASSESSOR
Granter/Agent
(2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE (Chapter 84.26 RCW)
Name (print)
Ifthe new owner(s) ofproperry with special valuation as historic property
wish to continue this special valuation the new owncr(s) must sign below.
Date & Place of Signing
If the new owncr(s) do not desire to continue such special valuadon. all
Signature 0
additional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW, shall be due
and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale.
G rante gent A jw
;!o
]�3L
(3) ONVNER(S) SIGNATURE
Name (print)
Date & Place of Signing &LI
PERJURY. Perjury is a class C felony which is punishable by imprisonment in a state correctional institution for a maxim
term of not more than five years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.(
or by both imprisonment and fine (RCW 9A.20.020 (IQ).
FOR TREASUREEVS USE ONLY
COUNTY TREASUT
FORM REV 84 0001A (12-93) (PD 12-17-93)
EASEMENT (CONTINUED)
herein describedyand the true point of the beginning. THENCE
north 45*43'10" wes"t 185 feet; THENCE north 44*16'50" east 10
feet; THENCE south 45'43'10" east 18.5 feet; THENCE south 44*16'50"
west 10feet to point of beginning.
situated in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington.
ORDER NO. 46852
15. Rights of the public and the City of Edmonds to that portion
known as Talbot Road-
16. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS GRP-NTED OR
RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT:
Recorded: December 1S, 1993
Recording No.: 9312150012
In favor of: Washingtoff Natural Gas Company, a Washington
Corooration
For: A Gas pipeline or pipelines
Affects: The Northeasterly 10 feet of a portion of Parcel A
17. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS GRANTED OR
RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT:
Recorded: June'13, 1994
Recording No.: 9405!30640
in favor of: Chester W. Johnson and Doris H. Johnson,
husband and wife
For: a nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress over and
across the ten foot strip of land
Af f ects: A strip of land 10 f eet in width across a portion
of Parcel S
NO SEARCH or GENERAL TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS HAS BEEN MADE.
THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT PURPORT TO REFLECT A FULL REPORT ON
CONDITION OF TITLE AND SFIALL HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT EXCEPT AS A
BASIS FOR THE CERTIFICATE APPLIED FOR.
THIS REPORT IS RESTRICTED TO THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE, AND IS NOT
TO BE USED AS A BASIS FOR CLOSIVG ANY TRANSACTION APPECTING TITLE
TO SAID PROPERTY - LIABILITY OF TBE COMPANY IS LIMITED TO TTIM
COMPENSATION RECEIVED THMEREEFOR.
RECORDS EXAMINED TO J= 16, 1994 AT 7:30 A.M.
CF-�RGE: NIC
--- ---------------
LANCE LEWIS
SENIOR COMMERCIAL
TITLE OFFICER
MEL MEHRTF-NS
COMMERCIAL TITLE OFFICER
Page 7 of 7
GP
7
7 U,7, 47, Y=,_ W,
A:"
SIV;
3 N
ty of Edmonds
Ci
INV
S E P �'I,
N�Wr,. CRITICAU A-D v 'TCtM,%NTER'
X%X_dAS!QHE
`�C
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on -this form' is An' qilplican't,` "of. his/her -representative, must fill out
to be' filled out 'by . any person preparing I a. I.ih�' checklist';'-1sikn and date it, and submit it to the
Development Permit Application for the City'of'_� "Jq"ity. lThe City will review the 'checklist, make a
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development ",,.precursory site—vi'sit, and make adeterminationof the
permit to the City. . ". . , I- .. . - — � .. I . .1
bsequ�hts�eps necessary to complete adevelopme'ni
ic�tion.
,permit appi
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to Please submit'a vicinity map along with the signed
.4 � o.o T :: t.4 -"4- " �'P� I , � - I t. l . . *a
determine whether any poiential Critical' Area's a`r`e,�o"*r` of this'form to 'assist City staff in finding an
may be, present on the 'subject property. 14he ocating the specific' I�ie�e of property described o"n"
V f - � 1. 1 � I . F.I
1 0
information needed to 'complete the Checklist should -;".this 'f6rin." addition',"'the applicant shall include
ih � - . , ,- �"; . , " .. , �-_ . I
w.
1 9, eqert-i" 'fif rmation (e.g., site plan, topography
be easily available from observations of e site. or . th i o
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, map, etc. or st'u'dies in conJunction with this Checklist"'."',.,,
maps, or soil surveys)"' to" '.assist :ftaff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
'4
A
I have completed the attached Critical Are'as Checklisit'a'n�"a""t't'"'e"'s"t, thaft'he- answers p . rovided are factual, to th . e`I.`,',�:,.,,
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate colum'n'bplq�y). l.,
J
Owner/Applicant.- Appliciiit'Repiesentative:
David C. & Ingeborg Jofiiison
Name
Name
212�1 Cypre*ss Way
":""§t� t
Street Address ee dress
Lynnwood WA
98036-7936
Zip
city State ....Zip 'City'
(425) 774-3560 OPY,
(425) 778-5584.
e e"h"I"'
Telephone p one
Signature
S*
ignature
t k
September 11, 1997
Date
Date
(o*er)
creception\janakcaddoc
/ t- "')
//7-5
PLANNING DATA
NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:- 1�007, T6AO� PJ, -DATE: ILI OL7
ZONING: "�fl — //-,� PLANCHK#: 97—,3�H
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Al&j �- F
CORNER LOT-!!JJV_!!��(Yes/No) FLAG LOT- Ye-� _(Yes/No)
SETBACKS: I lc�(IA16 jd er'
Required Setbacks:
Front: /() LeftSide:—/'c-I RightSide: Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: �'� Left Side: 'q0 Right Side: t( I Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required?- _(Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED — WN)
3,17�
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed:— —Actual:
B UILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
Datum Elevation: 1661'
Datum Point:
A.D.U. CREATED?:
V
c)� 2-
SUBDIVISION:
CRITICAL AREAS #:I �9- 17q --W6,wyL
SEPA DETERMINATION:
LOT
OTHER:
I
J,,,�-,
Plan Review By:— ,
mm'--,
c.,Tdcs\permitkAp1arid2Ldoc
14.
m
h't- c4 Ed and
e
jL�ENT NO - ------------------------------
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS El LID NO. ------- ASMT. NO.
,EP ------- --- ------------------- -------------------------
-J,015,�,-- D x:Es-S- -----------------------------
7000 - -----
CONTRACTOR --------- (fc-'Al-ff PERMIT -NO.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. -------- BLOCK NO - --------------------
NAME OF ADDITION -------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
ED
.... .. .......
e�,
fie
rj� 4V 1 '::7'-
js
ip 6-V
6d
wl
44
7
CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER PERMIT
WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT
PERMIT
Call 775-2525 for side sewer inspections BEFORE covering any portion of the construction.)
Inspection will be provided within 24 hours after requst. NO Sat., Sun., or holiday inspections.
170flO Ta�bc,� !-17,ad
ADDRESS LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION .............................................................................................................. . .......................................................
ATYACHED
PROPERTYLEGAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................................................... ................
- ------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . ..................................................
ER ......... C.
................................................................ OWNER IILND/OR BUILD ................................ �t ................................. . .......................................................
-!�TR
CONTRACTOWSNAME & ADDRESS ---------- : ....... ...... --------- * ------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------ - --- -----------------------
Permission is granted --------------- 13� 197A
....................... . ........ _-, 19 ......... for repair and/or connection of a side sewer to the city sanitary sewer
system in accordance with City of Edmonds ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CATJ D TO THE FOLLOWING:
N
yr, o. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct
side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
N�14 No. 2—All work performed in city right-of-way requires an Invasion of Right -of -Way Permit obtainable from the City Engineer's office.
NOTE No. 3--Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
NOTE No. 4—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%. No bends in grade
sharper than % will be permitted.
—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for failure due to improper
NOTE No. 5
work which may develop within one year of completion.
NOTE No. 6—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appurtenances except to in-
sert the pipe into the wye.
7,
D to BY ................
... ...... ..........................
DISAPPROVED Date By ................ Date .................... ----- By..
Date ------ ... . ... ..... . ... 4.1 - - ---------------- ---
APPRC
---- BY --- - ----- ---------------
OVED
-. e-
. .............. ...................
Remarks: ..... .... ... .......... .... ................ .... ... ................................... ... ...
..................................................................... . ............................................................................................................................ . .......................................................
BOTH Permit Coples.I�IUST Signed By Owner of Firm Performing Construction PRIOR To Request For Inspection
............ ..................................... .... —, hereby certify that the side sewer installation constructed under this permit
g Firm Performing Construction)
(Owner of Contracli,
was installed in accordancez th all governing ordinances of the City of Edmonds.
Dated this ...... .1 .............. day of ........ . .............................. a
Check BEFORE you dig for: Water E], Gas [3, Telephone E], Power E], er E]
(7,wr7, 0
A
CAA'
---------------
�.,P r
J�
QUIT CLAIM DEED
44.4
THE GRANTOR, POPE-& TALBOT, INC., a California Corporation, for and in consideration of One Dollar
($1.00), and other valuable considerations, in hand paid, quit claims to CHESTER W. JOHNSON and DORIS H.
JOHNSON., his wife
all interest in the following described real estate, situated in the County
of—Snobomish , State of —Washington
, All tidelands owned by the Grantor in front of, adjacent to or abutting on
the following described property, including that portion of Tideland Lot Three (3) in
front thereof as shown on the official Plat of Edmonds Tidelands on file in the office
of the Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington, except the Great Northern
Railway right-of-way, all situated in front of the following described property:
lbat portion of Government Lot Two (2) and that portion of Government Lot
Three (3),.Section Seven (7), Township Twenty�-seven (27) North., Range Four (4) East,
W.M. described as follows: BEGI , NNING at the.East one -quarter corner of Section Seven
(7), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Four (4) East, W.M. and proceeding thence
al-ong the East line of said Section Seven (7),,-North 1011,4511 East Four Hundred Thirty-
seven and Thirty�-five Hundredths (437..35) feet; thence Iffest Ten Hundred Thirteen and
Eighty-six Hundredths (1013.86) feet to the most Easterly corner of the tract herein
described and the true point of beginning; thence North 45"43110" West Four Hundred
Seventy-seven and Forty-three Hundredths (477-43) feet; thence along the Goverment
Meander line in said Section Seven M., South 46002,45" West One Hundred and Five Hun-
dredths (100-05) feet; thence South 45043,1011 East Four Hundred Ei hty and Fifty-one
19
Hundredths (480-51) feet; thence North 44016,50" East One Hundred (100.0) feet to the
true point of beginning; except right-of-way of -Great Northern Railway.
Reserving to the Grantor, its successors in interest and assigns, an residents
and owners of tracts.in the Plat of Talbot Park, a perpetual easement and right-of-way
over, along, across and upon said tidelands for the full enjoyment of beach rights and
privileges such as swimming I bathing, :boating, picnicking, etc., in common with the
Grantees. -their heirs and assigns.
WITNESS WHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this instrument to be executed by its proper officers
and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this-23rd day of —November—, 1949 -
0, .4.
IT
'Y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
S.
(.,-;t.v 2�ncl Ceml"tv r%f S'.X"
POPE & TALBOT, INC.
. ...............................
By .... ...
7'� .....
Fii6t Vice President
ji.
By .................... 6's. �( .
..................................................
Ass is ta nt Secretary
rW E,
-j
le
..... ......
yo
fk.
<
>
40
-( k�l)
7a A ior
06
P9710
to
A?,
IK
N414"' 17'08'Z' k)
'M CD
A q4 c
P� IV 14
BUKIDING 7g,q ROVE
AM
BE C 0S 1997
Avc, azor qr, 11, ji AtOchinent 4
8a
c 14R
File# V-97-57
f
I
E
7
17�
n4f 112 4
. . . . . . . . . . 4,�
>
OAAS�-SrbkY bloAtC
(ad)
ZZ
A ;��u
11, rH
=__" �f7
-760 A
e37)
/Py - -f6 �V PA07LIO
0 irk bf
N44" IT091'r
1-4
C%
q4 em a/
U I L 0 1 N 6
?a. , PR W
Attichment 4
File# V-97-57
:Ar
IA 11
CA FILE NO. `7
..",Critical Areas Checklist
------------------------------------- -----------------------
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegeia iion)
17002Talbot Roadi Edmonds
I Site Acfdiess/Location,,
2. Propqrt b —1 '073�0008
y Tax. Account um er* �727Q4 —
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 12,028 Sq. Feet
4. Is this site currently developed? yep; X no.
if yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site t9pograp'hy. Check all
that apply-.
..Flat: less,thlan.54eet, elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site ge.iex'ally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
f
Hill�: slopes present on site o more an 15 % and less th ..30'�q (a vertical
.rise 6f 107feet over a h6rizoni�l.dista: n'ce of 53 io66-feei).,
t p:.... gr greatet.than 30% present on site (ra.vettical rise,of 10-feet over-.-
ee. o:des. of
ahorizontal distance of less than,33 feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of ye*aiamt6und d` No
s, on ing water. Approx. Depth:
No,
-.7. Site contains areas -of seasoina1stah-din, , -t- 'th'
g wa e.r: Approx. ep
What season(s) of the -year?
& Site is in the floodway,_ �o floodplaih - No of a wa
ter,�qourse.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows a ' cross the grounds surface? Flows.are
year-round? No Flows are seasonal? No (What time of year?
10. Site is primaril
� y: forested meadow ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) X
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: No
Staff Use Only
For C'
-'Site is Zoned?
2. SCS mapped soil type(s)?
Weiland inventory or CA. map -indicates wedand present on site?
-4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
'Site withift designated earth subsidence landslide -hazard area?
Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Ma ?
p
'bE'TER'MINATION
STUDY REQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVER
_-_���WATVER
.Reviewed by: V411 (Y-i -7
Planner IDrate
^ca_chk-doc, Rev 02/11/97
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is: Ah applicant or his/her rept*ese
n. ive, must fill out
to be filled out by -any person preparing a the checklist, sign and date..it, and submit it to the
Development Perr.n-it Applicdfi6ri for the City of City will review the checklist, make a
Cit Th
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a develop t th
ment precursory si e visit,and make a rmina ion' o e
permit to the City.
subsequent s ep§: necessary to complete a development
permit application.
The purpose of the Checklist, is to,enable City s aff ih d
41. to Please submit a vicinity map,.*
a w ne
Jqii
9 e sig
determine whether, any pp pppAl" Uitical Areas af f ifii
te,oT co y o s form to �a:slsist City staff"ih- J in ing and
p
may be,! present on the subject. property.. j7hq.: locati th' fi 'Nd
peci ic pippe.of proper escri.,e on
"Ong P S. ty
In: ad id"i th hall include
Ould ;:ihis'�;f
information, needed'to bomolete the. ChecIlist. 8h
orM d
plican
4p
be easily I available from observations of:the ' it id t * f6imatibn (e.g., site plan, topography
si e or : 0, e
r p inen in
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventon'
e
rnap, etc-):Ot�s�04ips in co4j' ii6h with
_144c, :Checklist
maps, or s.oJ surveys)'. to assist staff in 06 leting their preli
mp minary
a . ssessnient of the site..
i#
I have completed the attached Critieal Areits.0 hecklistand. attest that the answers provided are Ifocival, to the
best of my knowledge (.f�ll out. the Appropriate col m below..
umn
Date
creception\janMcaddoc
Date
(over)
VICINITY MAP
31
ATTACEMIF
I NT I
PV4 &
Ix" a
N 4-, F,? N �5,074(9
.........
A =Z�z
IT�2L,11,
15.
L 2 aye o/
Al ;�5 04,? '52 "N 88. jo 17. 9
\C, 620
4t*l Yve I -W' Nk
f
.7'
114. N, P
6� 7,-fl rz /0. 06 -G
CPO, IX t 7- 9!,f 2,6
71
ZXX
6-7Yt PROtShelime
7 7il t6vle
LOT 2
01IR
4cli S t . 1 89Q
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.:
LOCATION:
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
David C. and Inge Johnson
V 97-57
17002 Talbot Road
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
APPLICATION: A variance to reduce the required street setback (north property
line) from 25 feet to 10 feet and to reduce the required rear setback
(south property line) from 25 feet to 20 feet for the construction of
a new one-story single-family residence (see Exhibit A,
Attachments 2 through 4).
REVIEW PROCESS: Variance: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
MAJOR ISSUES:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site
Development Standards).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
The subject property is a lot which was recently created through subdivision file #S-95-129.
Access to the lot is along the north property line (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Also along the
140-foot northern property line is a strip of property ("flagpole") providing access to lot 3, which
is a flaglot. Setbacks to the access easement (street setback) and the property line opposite the
access easement (rear setback) require a 25-foot setback, with 10-foot setbacks to the side
property lines. The applicants would prefer to center their home on their lot, with wider setbacks
to the east and west, and only 10 to 20 foot street and rear setbacks (to the north and south).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation:
Hearing Examiner Decision:
Approve with conditions
Approved with conditions
* Incorporated August 11, 1890 e
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The
hearing on the application was opened at 9:26 a.m., June 5, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds
Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:28 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and
the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the hearing is
available in the Planning Division.
HEARING COMMEENTS:
The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Meg Gruwell reviewed the staff report.
From the Applicant:
David and Inge Johnson said they wanted a one level house and needed the variance to
allow them to have one.
From the Community:
No one from the general public spoke at the public hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
1) Size: The subject property is 12,009 net square feet in area, and is
rectangular in shape with 90-feet (narrowing to 85-feet) of width
parallel to Talbot Road and 140-feet of lot depth (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4).
2) Land Use: The subject property is a newly created lot and is currently
undeveloped.
3) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Single -Family
Residential (RS-12) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
4) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject site slopes to the west, with most
of the slope being in two banks, one at the east end and one at the west
end, and the area in-between being fairly flat (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4). The area is primarily a lawn, with one mature fruit
tree.
Hearing E.-aminer Decision
V 97-57
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a. facts: -'e,
I ) The property to the west is zoned Single -Fa.
and is developed with a single-family hom,-,
Attachment 1).
2) The property to the east is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-.-.
and is developed with a legal, nonconforming 9-unit apartment
building (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
3) The property to the north and south are zoned Single -Family
Residential (RS-12) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1). Immediately to the
south is a single-family residence, which appears to be about 10 feet
from the subject property's south property line, with mature shrubs
growing in its setback. Immediately to the north is an access easement
and the yards of existing single-family residences which are located to
the east and west of the subject parcel.
B. HISTORY
On November 4, 1996, approval was granted for a three -lot subdivision (File S-95-129).
The subject property is the middle of those three lots. The new lot to the west is
developed with a single-family residence, and the new lot to the east is developed with a
legal, nonconforming, 9-unit apartment building. The Engineering Division required a
turnaround as a condition of the subdivision, S-95-129. The short plat applicant
requested that the turnaround not be located on lot 3, so the Engineering Division
required it to be located on the east end of the panhandle for lot 3. The approved
easement intrudes 5 feet into the new lot 2, giving it a slight hourglass shape.
C. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. Facts: Variances granted based on special circumstances are exempt from
SEPA review (WAC 197-11-800(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15A.080).
D. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
1. Critical Areas Compliance
a. Facts:
1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15.13
(Critical Areas Ordinance).
2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist (CA-95-115) in
conjunction with the initial subdivision. The city has issued a
determination that a Critical Areas Study is required, due to the steep
slope hazard area on the western -most lot.
3) This proposal qualifies for a Conditional Waiver, because it is more
than 65 feet from the steep slope, and will not impact the critical area
or its buffer.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 4
b. Conclusioni The applicant has complied with the requirements of the
City's Critical Areas Ordinance.
2. Compliance with RS-6 Zoning Standards
a. Fact: The fundamental site development standards pertaining to
Residential development in the RS-12 zone are set forth in Chapter
16.20.030. These include the following for locating structures:
1)
Street Setback:
25 feet
2)
Rear Setback:
25 feet (5 feet for detached structures < 600 sq. ft.)
3)
Side Setbacks:
10 feet
4)
Maximum Height: 25 feet
5)
Lot Coverage:
35%
b. Conclusion: The proposal complies with the requirements of the zoning
ordinance except for the portion for which the variance is applied for.
3. Compliance with Requirements for a Variance
a. Facts:
1) Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby a
provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the
application of the provision would result in an unusual and
unreasonable hardship. The criteria are as follows:
a) Special Circumstances: That because of special circumstances
relating to the property such as size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings of the property, strict enforcement of
the zoning ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and
privileges permitted to other properties iri the vicinity with the
same zoning. Special circumstances should not be predicated
upon any factor personal to the owner such as age or disability,
extra expense which may be necessary to comply with the
zoning ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, the ability
to make more profitable use of the property, not any factor
resulting from the action of the owner or any past owner of the
same property.
b) Special Privilege: That the approval of the variance would not
be a grant of special privilege to the property in comparison
with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with
the same zoning.
C) Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance: That the approval
of the variance will be consistent with the intent of the
comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the zoning
district in which the property is located.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 5
d) Not Detrimental: That the variance, as approved or
conditionally approved, will no t be significantly detrimental to
the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property
or improvements in the vicinity and the same zone.
e) Minimum Variance: That the approved variance is the
minimum necessary to allow the owner rights enjoyed by other
properties in the vicinity with the same zoning.
2. The applicant has submitted declarations with their submittal which
address the decisional criteria as follows (see Exhibit A, Attachment
3):
a) The applicants point out that although they could fit the
proposed home 10 feet from' the west property line and meet
the required setbacks, but that would require retaining walls,
due to the slope on the west end of the property, and might
affect its stability. They also point out that due to the required
easement to allow a turnaround their property has an hourglass
shape, with an 80 foot width in'the middle. In reviewing the
proposed plan, planning staff has determined that the proposed
house cannot meet setbacks even if moved within 10 feet of the
west property line.
b) The applicants point out that most houses are oriented towards
Talbot Road, with the their smaller, side setbacks to the north
and south property lines.
C) Approval will allow for a single-family use, consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
d) The applicants point out that the proposal will not exceed lot
coverage, and will otherwise be consistent with the zoning
ordinance.
e) The applicants feel the proposed location would be beneficial
to all the neighbors, by minimizing the impacts on views for
the houses to the south, north, and east, and by providing
additional privacy to the house to the west.
f) The applicants feel this is the minimum variance needed.
b. Conclusions:
1) The topography of the site pushes the building pad into the center of
the site. However, because a turnaround has been required, and
because the turnaround has been located in the center of the subject
site so it can provide a turnaround not only for these two sites, but for
the properties to the north, the center of the site provides a narrower
building pad. These taken together provide the special circumstances
in this application.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 6
2) Because most houses in this area are oriented so that Talbot Road, or
their property line closest to Talbot Road, is their street property line,
the proposed orientation will be more similar to existing houses in this
area than an orientation which met required setbacks. Therefore no
special privilege is gained.
3) Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued
development of the site in a manner consistent with the intent of the
Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site (see
also Section F below).
4) Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare. The proposed house location.appears; to be the least
detrimental to the scenic views of surrounding property owners.
Though the location places it fairly close to the house to the south, the
proposed setback will match the side setback of the house to the south,
and will keep the proposed house out of the westerly view of the house
to the south. The proposed location will also increase the privacy of
the house to the west, and will require less soil disruption than a more
westerly location.
5) Approval of the requested variance appears to be the minimum
required to allow for construction of new single family homes.
Although a narrower home could be designed for the lot, it would
probably force the house to be two -stories, which would be more
detrimental to the views of nearby residents, and would make the home
less accessible.
E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
1. Review by City Departments
a. Fact: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated by the
Fire Department, Public Works Division, Engineering Division, and the
Parks and Recreation Division. The only comments received were from
the Engineering Division, who commented, "Storm drainage
improvements have been imposed as a condition of the short plat. The
applicant will be required to comply with all terms of any future permits."
b. Conclusion: The requirements of the Engineering Division should be
met.
F. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC)
1. Comprehensive Plan Designation
a. Fact: The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Single
Family Residential.
b. Conclusion: The proposed. project is consistent with the existing
Comprehensive Plan designation for the site.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 7
2. Comprehensive Plan Policies
a. Facts: The Residential Development section of the Comprehensive Plan
identify goals and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in
the City. Specific goals and policies include:
1) Section B states, "High quality residential development which is
appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be
maintained and promoted..."
2) Section B.3 states, "Minimize encroachment on view of existing
homes by new construction or additions to existing structures."
b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above
adopted goals and policies of the City for the development of residential
property.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a -variance is approved,
subject to the following conditions:
I . The encroachment into the setback will be in approximately the same location as
proposed on the site -plan and will not be any greater in size than 20 feet to the rear
(south) property line and 10 feet to the street (north) property line, as proposed in this
application (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The. applicant must obtain a building permit prior to any construction.
4. The permit is transferable.
Entered this 16th day of June, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
Fc
Ron McConnell
Hearing Examiner
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 8
RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must
cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
APPEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
the conditional use pen -nit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIBIT:
The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record.
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
PARTIES OF RECORD:
David C. & Inge Johnson Edmonds Planning Division
21221 Cypress Way Edmonds Engineering Division
Lynnwood, WA 98036
CITY. OF EDMONDS LAURA M. HALL
250 - 5TH AV . E. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206177.1-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
9 0 10 9 ri Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation a Engineering
LE TTER OF TRANSAIMAL
Date: June 15, 1995 For 17000 Talbot Road, Edmonds
To: Vern L Bower PE, PLS
Intensus
PO Box 1486
Snohomish, WA 98291-1486
Subject: Critical Areas Checklist
Transmitting:
Lot 3 of the subdivision (The
westerly lot of the subdivision -- on
the bluff.)
For your information:
As you requested:
For your file:
Comment and return:
Note attachments:
Comments: Please bring in a copy of the Critical
Areas Checklist when applying for a building
permit.
CC; Chester Johnson
Planning Division
Diane Cunninpham
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Cities In'ternaflonal — Hekinan, Japan
89, 0 I.o9,-
City of Edmonds
Critical Areas Checlrdist
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be filled out by any person.
preparing a Development Permit
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any
potential Critical Areas are or may be
present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the
Checklist should be easily available from
observations. of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps,
or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it,
and submit it to the City. The City will
review the�checklist, make a precursory site
visit, and make a determination of the
subsNutnt steps n6c�ssary to complete a
development permit application.
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity map
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
with enouOh detail that City staff can find
and identify the subject parcel(s). In
addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g. site
plan, topography !nap, etc.) or studies in
conjunction with this Checklist to assist
staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest 1hat the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column' below).
Owner / Applicant:
(::7;4eU1e1- A/ \-/6�1-5dj
Name
— 17doo T�/%,,/ 170/_
Street Address
A1,4 79,207
.. 2&2� 7 _
Elty, State, ZIP Phone
Signature
Date
Applicant Representative:
t4lwz Aeaje-r-;
//VrzF&'Y6/J
Name
"00 &�dx /4(sc
Street Address
4'V-7?-92
&'46FM"J�� - alw
City, State, ZIP ' Phone
116��- 6J1zOJO-- -�T-9-6;
eig-nature / Date
CA FILE NO
Critical Areas Checklist
Site Information (soils/topograpliy/hydrology/vegetation)
1. Site Address/Location: 174Z 727AI Z Eda
2. Property 'rax Account Nurnbe r: 0 72 704 — 022 - 0000 �$4
0
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site cuff ently developed? yes; no.
If yes; how is site developed? Yelmil 4 e tj
z7 _Z_
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: ' less than 5-fe6t eleVMion change over entfe6 site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water
7. Site contains arm-, of seasonal standing water:
What season(s) of the year?
Wo ; Approx. Depth:
/,,,/a _-, Approx. Depth:
8. Site is in the floodway Alo floodplain A/* of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the -rounds surface? Flows are year-
0
round? A/- Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow _; �shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) t---
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
For City Staff Use Only
1. Site is Zoned?
R- OQfZ."3
City of Edmonds
Critical Areas Determination
Applicant: � Chester ohnson I Dete rinination #: I CA-95-115
Project Name: I I Permit Number: I I
Site Location: 17000 Talbot Road Property Tax.Acct #: 07270410220000
Project Description
Non -Project Specific
Determination: Study Required:
During review and inspection of the subject site on June 14, 1995, it was found that the site
contains a Steep Slope Hazard Area along the western portion of the property pursuant to
Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC).
Based on these findings, prior to submission of any development permit, the requirements of
ECDC 20.15B must be satisfied by completing the following:
Before any permit application may be s ' ubmitted, submit to the Planning
Department a topographic survey prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor delineating Steep
Slope Hazard Areas. Any slope over 40% with more than 20 feet of rise will be classified
as a Steep Slope Hazard Area. A 50 foot buffer is required from both the top and toe of
the slope. A 15 foot building setback is required from the 50 foot buffer.
For development of any kind which is proposed within the critical area, 50 foot buffer or
15 foot buffer setback, it must be shown that the development will not adversely impact the
Critical Area or its buffer, by doing one or possibly . both of the following depending on the
outcome of the study:
For development proposals which will occur within the 50 foot buffer, but no
closer than 25 feet from the top or toe or the slope, the 50 foot buffer
reqtiirement may be reduced to 10 feet if a study is completed by a licensed
geologist or geoteclinical engineer which clearly demonstrates that the proposed
buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any
private party. All Critical Area Studies must be completed under a three party
contract where the City hires the professional required, and the applicant pays
for the study (pursuant to ECDC Section 20.15B. 150).
2. If development must occur within the critical area, buffer, and/or buffer
setback, and is not identified as an exception per ECDC Chapter 20.15B, a
Reasonable Use Exception and Variance must be obtained pursuant to ECDC
20.15B. 180A and 20.15B.04k).
All proposed development of the subject lot must meet the requirements of Chapter 19.05
of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
If the property owner wishes to apply. for a specific development permit which they feel
would not impact the Critical Areas located on the site, they may submit their proposal
to the Planning Department for review. If the Planning Department finds that the
proposed development permit will not adversely impact a Critical ' Areas or its buffers, a
conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis.
Name
Signature
A-16-97 MON 13:40
P. Oi
1 4
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
250 UTH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 e 1200) 771-0220 - FAX Q06; 771-0221
HEARINO EXAMINFER
4C" S t 89'
FINDINGSO CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICANT. David C. and Inge Johnson
CASE NO.: V 97-57
LOCATION: 17002 Talbot R o*ad
APPLICATION: A varianc-. to reduce the required street setback (north property
line) from 25 &ct to 10 foct and to reduce the. requircd mar setback
(south property line) from 2� feet to 20 feet for the'cons(.ructign of
a new one-story single-family residence (see Exhibit A,
Attachments 2 through 4).
RIEVIEW PROCESS- Variance: Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
MAJOR ISSUES:
a:, Compliance with Ednionds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Saction 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Site
Development Standards),
b. Compliance with Edrnonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.85 (VARLANCES).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
The subject property is a lot which was recently created through subdivision file 4S-95,7129,
Access to the lot is along the north property line (see Exhibit A, Attachmcat 4). Also along the
40 foot northern property line Is a strip of property (11agpole") providing access to lot 3, which
is a flaglot. Setbacks to the access easement (street setback) and the property line opposite the
access easement (rear setback) require a. 25-foot setback, with 10-foot setbacks to the side.
property lines. The applican�s would prefer to center their home on their lot, with wider setbacks
to the etwt and west, and only 10 to 20 foot street and mar setbacks (to the north andsouth).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff R000mmendadon. Approve with conditions
Hewing Exan-Liner Decision: Approved with conditions
0 Incorijorated Ausust 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
JUN-15-07 MON 13:41
F. 02
.PUDLIC HEARING;
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No, V 97-57
Page 2
After reviewing the officia). file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory ReporL; and
after visiting die, site, ' the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on,the application. The
hearing onthe application was opened at 9:26 a.m., June 5, 1997, in the Community Services
Conference. Room, 250 P Ave, N,, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9,28 a.m. Participants,
at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim
recording of the hearing is available In the Planning Division.
HEARING COMMENTS:
rri, C_ " . —, �f +1 "01— +'
111.ner
I it JullwW1116 10 CL al"LlILIC[I)l V1 Ut%? %., it to V at M., YVIGAV
From the City;
Meg CTruwell reviewed the staff report.
Rom the Applicant:
David atid Trige Johnson said they wanted a one level house and needed the variance to
allow them to have one.
Frorn the Community;
No ono from the general public spoke at the public hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development And Zoning -
a. Facts;
1) Size: The subject property is 12,009 net square feet in w,ea, and is
rectangular in shape with 90-feet (narrowing to 85-fect) of width
parallel to Talbot Road and 140-feet of lot dePLh (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4).
2) Land Use: The subje.'et property is a newly creattd lot and i,5 ctirmnfly
undeveloped.
3) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is, Single-Furnily
Residential (RS- I Z) (see Exhibit A, Artachmew 1).
4) Terrain and Vegotation: The -subject site slopes to the west, with most
of the 51opc bcing in two bank5, onc at the cast rnd and mic at dic wcst
end, and the area in-between being fairly flat (see ExhiNt A,
Attawhrnent 4). The area is primarily a lawn, with one nialure fruit
trec,
JUN-10-e7 HON 13142
P. 03
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
B. HISTORY
Hearing Examiner Deckion
Case No. V 97-37
Page 3
1) The property to the west is zoned Singlc-Family Rcsidcntial (RS-12)
and is developed with a single-family horne (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 1).
2) The property to the east is zoned Single -Family Residential (RS-12)
and is developed with a legal, nonconforming 9-unitt apartment
building (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
3) The property to the north and south are zoned Si11Bl07F!11T1ily
Residertial (RS-12) (See ExbiNt A, Attachment !)- ate] y to the
south is a sinzile-family residence, which appe.ars to be about 10 feet
from the subject property'g south property line, with mature shrubs
growAng in its setback. Irnmcdiatcly to the north is an access ca."'onicnt
and the yard� of existing single-family residences which are located to
the east and west of the subject parcel.
On November 4, 1996, approval was granted for a thre�,-Iot subdivision (File S-95-129).
The subject Propeity is the middle, of those three lots. The neW lot to 011� WCSt iS
developed with a &ingle-family residence, and the new lot to the east is de..velopcd "'ith a
legal, nonconforming, 9-unit apurtment buildilag, Tho Engineering DiviNion required a
turnarouad as a condition of the subdivision, 3-95-129, Thr: zzihort plat applicant
requested that the turnaround not be located on lot 3, so the Engineering Division
required it to be located on The east end of the panhandle for lot 3. The approved
easernent intrudes 5 feet into the new1ot 2. giving it a slight houri-ass shape.
C. STATE ENVIRONME NTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. &Ch: Variances granted based on special circumstances are exeimpt from
SEPA review (WAC 197-1 I-SGO(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15A-090).
D. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANC-E
1. Critical Areas Compliance
a. Facts:
1) This proposal is subject tb rryicw undor ECDC Chuptcr 20.15.B
(Critical Areas Ordinance).
2) The applicant,has submitted F. Critical Areas Checklist (CA-95-115) in
conjunction with the initial subdivision. The city li�Ls issuzd a
detenTlination that a Critical Areas'Study is required, due to the steep
slope hazard area on the western -most lot.
3) This proposal qualifies for a Conditional Waiver, because it is iniore
than 65 feet from the steep slope, and will not impact the chfical area
or its buffer.
JUN-10-9T 11ON-13;42
F. 04
Hearing Examiner Dccl.�ion
Case No. V 97-57
Page 4
b. Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of tile
City's Critical Areas Ordinance.
2. Compliance with RS.'6 Zonhig Standards
a, fALt- The fundamental site development standards pertaining to,
Residential development in the RS-12 zone are set forth in Chapter
16.20.030, These include the following for lochting structures:
1) Street Setback: 25 feet
2) Rear Setback: 25 feet (5 feet for detached structures < 600 sq. ft.)
3) Sidc Sctbacks: 10 fcct
4) Maximum Height- 25 feet
5) Lot Coverage: 15%
b. Concluslon: The proposal complies with the requirements of the zoning
ordinance except for the portion for which the variance is applied for.
3. Compliance with Requirements for a Variance
a. Facts:
1) Chapter 20,85 of the ECDC sets forth the, me-chanism whoreby a
provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the
application of the provision would result in an Linusual and
unreasonable hardship. The criteria are as follows:
Si)ecial CiTegnistances: That because, of special circurnstiltlecs
relating to the property such as size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings of the property, strict enforcement of
the zor:ting ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights anti
privileges permitted to other properties ifi the vicinity with the
same zordrig. Special circumstances should not be predicated
upon any factor personal to the owner such as �jge or disability,
extra expense which may be, necessary to comply witli the
zoning ordinance, the ability to secure a scenic view, tile ability
to make, more profitable use of the property, not any factor
resulting frorn the action of the owner or any pitst. owner of rhe
same property.
b) SVecial Privilege: That the approval of the variance. wotfld not
be 3 grant of special privilege to the property in comparison
with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with
the sarne zoning.
c) Com2reliensive Plan mid Zoning Ordinance: That the approval
of the variance will be consistent with the intrcnI, of the
comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance. and the zoning
district in which the property is located.
,JUN-15-97 MON 13;43
F. 05
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 5
d) Not Detrimental: That the variance, as appIroved or
conditionally approved, will not be significantly detrimental to
die public health, safety and welfare or injurious to the property
or improvements in the vicinity and the saine zone-
C) Minimum Variance: That the approved variance is the
minimurn nccessary to allow the owncr ri-hLS cnjoycd by othcr
properties in the vicinity with the same zoning.
2. The,applicant has submitted declarations with their submittal which
address the decisional criteria as follows (see Exhibit A, Attachiricnt
3):
a) The applicants point out that although they could fit the
proposed home 10 feet from the west property line and rneet
the required setbacks. but that would require retaining wal Is.
due to the slope on the west end of the property, and inl8lit
affcut itsstability. They also point out that ducto thc required
easement to allow a turnaround their property has an hou rglass
shape, with an 80 foot width in the middle. In reviewing the
proposed plan, planning staff has determined that the proposed
house catinot rneet setbacks even if moved within 10 feet of the
we5t property line.
b) The applicants point out that most houses are oriented towards
Talbot Road, with the their sinaller, side setbacks to the north
and south property lines.
C) Approval will allow for a single-family use, cnn�istent with the
Comprehen3ive Plan.
d) The applicants point out that the proposal will no,, exceed lot
coverage, and will otherwise bc consistent with the zoilln(T
lb
ordinance.
e) The applicants feel the proposed location would he beneficial
to all the neighbors, by minimizing the. 411P-aCtS 011 vicvvs for
the houscs to the souih, north, and east, and by providing
additional privacy to the bouse to the west.
f� The applicants feel this is the minimum variance needed.
b. Conclusions:
1) The topography of the sito pushes the building pad into the center of
the site. However, be -cause a turnaround h4s been required, and
because the turnarDund has btefl located in the centtr of the subject
site so it can provide a turnaround not only fOT the-sc two sites, bUt for
the properties to the north, the o�nter of the site provides a narrower
building pad. These taken together provide the ipecial circumstances
in this application.
JUN-10-UT MON 13;qq,
F. 00
Hcaring Examinor Decision
Cwse No. V 97-57
Page 6
2) Because most houses in this area are oriented so that Talbot Roadi or
their property line closest to Talbot Road, i3 their Areet property line,
the proposed orientation will be -more similar to existing housts.in this
area than an orientation which met required. setbacks.' Therefore no
special privilege is ga . ined.
3) Approval of the proposed variance would alloix for the continuod
development of the site in a manner consistent with [tic intent of the
Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation ofthe. site (sce
also Section F belo,w),
4). Approval of the variance would not be &-trimental to the public health,.
L L 111L, F1 FU- U UUL13�- ILA-CLUILM a %_ala W LIL, 1ULL . L
Safety U-1- wr-_11121 VP42
detrimental to the sc6nic views of surrounding property owners.
Though the lvcation places it fairly closc to the h6iisr- tu the sutith, the
proposed setback will match the side setback of the house to the. south,
and will keep the proposed house out of the Westerly view of the -house
to the south. The proposed location wOl also inurease the privacy of
the house to the west, and will re4quire less &oil disruption than a more
westerly location.
5) Approval of the requested variance appears to be the ' rninimuni
required to allow for construction of new single fwiiily homes.
Although a narrower home could be designEd for the lot, it would
4P
probably forcethe house to be two -stories, which would be more
detrimental to the views of nearby residents, and would make the horne
less accessible.
E. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
1. Review by City Departments
a. FaCA: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated bythe
Fire Department, Ptiblic Works Division, Engineering Division, and the
Park& and Recreation Division- The only cornments received were from
the Engineering Division, who cornrnent4 "Storin drainage
finprovcnaciats havo bc.cn imposod as a condition of ' the short plat. The
applicant will be required to comply with all terms of any future perinits.-
b. Conclusion. The requirements of the Engineering Division should be
met.
F. COMPREHENSIV E PLAN (ECDC)
1. Comprehensive Plan Designation
a. Pact, The Comprehensive Plan designates the subjcct property as Single
Family Residential.
b. Conglusion: The propose d project is consistent with the existing
Comprehensive Plan designation for the, site,
.JUN-10-07 MON 13,44
P, 07
2. Comprehensive Plan Policies
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 7
a. Facts: The Residential Development scc.tion of the Comprehensive Plan
identify goals and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in
the City. Specific goals and policies include-
1) section B states, "High quality residential de * velopment which is
appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be
maintained and promoted..."
2) Section B,3 states, "Minimize encroachment on view of existing
homes by new constructioa or additions to existing sifuctures."
b. Concluston: The propased d�velopmew ist-on'siste-ril with the L*Ibove
adopted g6als and policies of the City for the development of residential
property.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance is approved,
subJDct to the following conditions:
I . The encroachment into the seback will be. in approXimately. the same locLition as
proposed on tbe site -plan and will not be any greater in size than 20 feet to the rear
(south) property line and 10. feet to the street (north) property line, as proposed in t1lis
application (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in Lhe Edmonds
Community Development Code, it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in thcsc. ordinances.
3, T�e applicafit must obtain abuildinS permit prior to any construction-
4. The perinitis transferable,
Entcred thi-i 16th day of Julie, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100. of the Community'Development Code of the Civy of Edmonds.
Pon McConnell
Hearing Ex4miner
.1
JUN_10_0� nQN i3i4o
Hearing Exarniner Decision
Case No. V 97-57
Page 8
RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing recon.6deration's and
uppeals. Any person wishing.to file or respond to a recornmendution or uppeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATTON
Section 20.10D.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision of
recommendation if 6 written reguest is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
initial decision by any person who attcnds thc public hearing and signs the attcriddricc. rcgistcr
and/or presents testimony or by any pemon holding an ownership intexest in a tract of land
which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The recowl-,ideration TequesL MLISt
citc specific references to the findings andlor the criteria conLained in the ordiffilnCeS
governing the type of application being reviewed.
APPEALS
Section 20.1.05.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommt�ndation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include tlie
decision being appealed along with the nalue of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the dccision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the , Community Development Director within ten (1Q) workJng days -after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section. 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building i�
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year froin'the date of approyal,
the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an
application for an exte-nsion of the time before the expiration date.'
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
The property owner may as a result or the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change in the valuation of the, property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIUM
The following exhibit wis offered and entered into the record.
A, Planning Division Advisoq Report
PARTIES oF RE CORD:
David C. &Inge Johmon Edmonds Planning Division
21221 Cypress Way Edinonds Engineering Division
Lynnwood, WA 98036