Loading...
17409 76TH AVE W.PDF11111111111111 15073 7409 76TH AVE W AUG NO EXCISE TAX 0 REQUIRED 20 207220403 ..."'.........107/22/2002 01:48'PM Snohomish ENONEER'NG ?..0002 RECORDED County JUL 2 2 20OZ AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: 8W QUIUjI, sacheMn =qjl ANTINI By �ame Rob Michel 212" SW, #102 is t DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND DFTiNTION TANK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT . .. ......... . FIRST AIWERIt 00,15tC Whereas Regin�ticl ji Br -to)" '�ncl Valeriq-� Bruce, husband and wife, are the owners of the following legally described property. Lot 1 of City*'of,-Edriiqrfds' S.Wt Plat No S-98-121, According to the Short Plat recorded March 7, 2000, under ree6'rdin4'Nq.­2W003075002, in Snohomish County, Washington, and TRACTA A non-ljxcliL�;ve-�4�6m`�-nt for ipgress and egress and delineated on City of Edmonds Short Plat *�o -.,8-9a-111jccQrdin§Ao Short Plat recorded March 7, 2000, under recording No 20000��-5002,.*.in*'Sr.Tb"hom4tfi County, Washington Whereas Michel Construction, Inc- , Is 4tie" own6'r of the following legally described propert .., ..., . %.., y Lots 2, 3, and 4 of City of EdMonds Short Plat' No S-98-121, According to the Short Plat recorded March, 7, 2000, under recording' No..20000075002, in Snohomish County, Washington, and fess and egress and delineated on City of TRACT A A non-exclusive easemehl for N+9 , Edmonds Short Plat No S98_121, acdo.rding tp-S�oK-Pl�d recorded March 7, 2000, under. recording No 20000307-5002, in Snoh&M6.G6un!y, Washington J�JS DOCUMENT IS RECORDED AS A COuli i W NOW, therefore FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO ASSUMESAO LIABILITY FOR SUFFICIENCY. Reginald D Bruce and Valerie L Bruce, Grantors, estabfish-aAW969APSW�d across the following described portion of their property, for the purpose of constrij . ctiqn, of . a storm water detention tank, and access for maintenance of said tank The south 52,feet of the West 21 feet of Lot 1 of City'%of..Edin9mds Sj-wl Plat No S-98-121, According to the Short Plat recorded March 7, 2000, uhder-r'�co.rdi�g..Nb-,200003075002, in Snohomish County, Washington for the benefit of Lots 2,.5 and,4 of-*City.of Edmonds Short Plat No S-98-121, According to the Short Plat recorded Warch 7*,`2000;*. qndef recording No -200003075002, in Snohomish County, Washington ... ... .. Owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 described above shall maintain the L approximaQy 1.61'x 39 x Xfcpncrete detention tank constructed within said area, including pump -out cleaning, a*S"n(pc*e'ss4r-y;.and,-.jhe cost of said maintenance shall be the responsibility of the owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4* Th4deptiement is granted with the express understanding that the detention tank occupies the driv`e'wa*y' a9ce . ss to Lot 1 Owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 shall notify owner of Lot 1 a minimum of five (5) days irr`adNqnte­6T'any`--. maintenance to be performed on said detention tank which would obstruct acces�-to'Lot 1 dr�veway� Page 1 of 2 the'event of a catastrophic failure of said detention tank, repair to said tank must be undertaken by ...ownej� of Lots 2, 3 and 4, at their sole expense, within five (5) days of the date driveway access to Lot 1 .!A.6b§trycted Repair must be completed within fifty (50) days of date of failure .1his.eauem6ni and maintenance agreement shall be perpetual and shall run with the land for benefit :;and'burdbns-;Df.heir&-and successors in interest to the described parcel .......... -7 Paf6d Is-'- f A,&&, -2002 aid D Bruce,.Grantee :-"Val&�Je L Brue e",",G rantee Robin-W. Mi*rhel, President; Inc, rantor STATE OF WASHINGTON Y*6 COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH certify that I know of have satisfactory evidencolhat R-EGIN�NLD D BRUCE and VALERIE L BRUCE are the individuals who appeared before me, and said- fi6dividjua1r;.ack6DwIedged that they signed this instrument, and on oath stated that it to be the free and voluntary acl.aflsuch-�paity for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument all Pauli Harrigan., Notairy P6blic*in artb for the State of� W ing'M 'Edmonds as6'iaQton re.std 2-10-6114 0 My appi5i1fftiS9pf'6xpireq 2/1-0/04 STATE OF h#%.dT op W A'S%N�" ss COUNTY OF SN6H0Mj§H, I certify that I know of have satisfactory evidence that ROBIN W MICHEL,--(� the'pprson who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, il . nd ojf'oath*-9tated that he was authorized to executethe, M I nt and acknowledged it as the President of Mrcfiel Cpn�t�uction, Inc , to be the MPII free and voluntary a6t )fty the uses and purposes mentioned iri'tMs in�trii f * V! IV Paula Harrigan Notary Public in and for the State',01' Washington residing at Edmonds FO My appointment expires 2/10) 4 it W'o -7 of X Page 2 of 2 2002072204'03 C�TY COPY Dennis M. Bruce, RE. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer September 11, 2000 Mr. Rob Michel r- &,� STR'tt Michel Construction, Inc. T FILc 7907 - 212th Street S.W. #102 Edmonds, Washington 98026 Subject: SEP .13 20ag DEVELOPMENT SEjIVICES CITY OF EDMONDS CTR. dmonds This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the property at 17409, 17407 and 17405 - 76th Avenue West, Edmonds, Washington. This evaluation was necessitated by City of Edmonds requirements. REFERENCES: • Vicinity Map (figure 1) • Site / drainage plan by John Mellor, P.E., approved by City of Edmonds Engineer March 9, 2000 (copy in city file) • Geotechnical engineering report and steep slope evaluation by Nelson Couvrefte & Assoc., dated March 14, 1995 (copy in city file) • Site photographs, (available). BACKGROUND: It is understood that Lots 2, 3, and 4 are part of an overall parcel containing Lot No. 1 with existing residence, and Lots 2, 3, and 4 (see site map). This investigation deals with Lots 2, 3, and 4 with regard to geotechnical slope issues. It is understood that property owner wishes to construct single family residences on each of Lots 2, 3, and 4. No development or construction has occurred on the lots to date. Lots 2 and 3 gently slope to the west. Lot 4 contains a "flatter portion, as well as a more steeply sloped rear (easterly portion). Lots 2 and 3, and the flatter portion of Lot 4 are densely vegetated with shrubs, bushes and trees (see photographs). The steeper (easterly) portion of Lot 4 contains mature trees and shrubs. SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442 Michel Construction Pagetwo ASSESSMENT: While not within the scope of this evaluation, this engineer assessed the existing residence on Lot 1 for any geotechnical distress. No evidence of any foundation settlements or shifting were observed. Visual assessments of Lots 2, 3, and 4 by this engineer throughout the past year revealed no evidence of any geotechnical distress: No sliding, no creep, no shifting, nor any significant erosional degradation was observed on the overall property, including Lots 2, 3, and 4. In order to augment existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were dug (by backhoe) under this engineer's observation on September 11, 2000. The findings of the three soil test pits (plotted on the site plan) were very similar, namely: 01' to 61' Organics, roots, and black silt 6" to 16' Brown silty sand, moist, with silt lenses 16" to approx. 6' Dense to very dense grey sand with gravels Ground water was encountered at three foot (3') depths in each of the three test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable throughout the excavated time frame (approximately two hours). CONCLUSIONVIRECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in the area, Lots 2, 3, and 4 are geotechnically approved for the proposed single family residences, subject to the following conditions: Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing pressure: 2,000 p.s.f. Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p-c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall provided the drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer. For retaining wall design, use a friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of 350 p.c.f. The foundations for the proposed structures may be placed anywhere on Lots 2, 3, and 4, within the City of Edmonds setback distances. Michel Construction Page three Geotechnical inspection by this engineer l2rior to any foundation concrete placement. The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and individual spread footings should have ml nl.m'u,m, Widths of eighte' en' (1* 8) and twenty- four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches below the lower adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation. Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on -the order of one -quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Coefficient of Friction 0.55 Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Michel Construction Page four Where: (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot. (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS: Retaining walls backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Parameter Active Earth Pressure' Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where: 30 p.c.f. 350 p.c.f. 0.55 125 p.c.f. (1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities. For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). Michel Construction Page five The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION AND SLOPES: In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertical. For temporary cuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1:1 Michel Construction Page six (Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under specific recommendations by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be modified for site conditions. All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and without warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potenbal hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS: Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. Groundwater was observed in each of the three test pits during the field work. Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and likely if excavation occurs during winter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL: The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Michel Construction Page seven NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre -construction meeting with City of Edmonds building officials and inspectors. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill: I CONUO Nam"Fron- M- Beneath footings, slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum Relative Coml2action 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On-SIte Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. Michel Construction Page eight Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceptable if the upper organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering inspection. DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident on Lots 2, 3, and 4. Surface runoff flows generally westerly into the existing drainage channel. This engineer recommends compliance with the City of Edmonds standard storm water drainage controls. CONCRETE: All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls, etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete mix. INSPECTION8 The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction: • Soil cuts • Foundation subgrade verification Any retaining wall, or rockery placement Any fill placement and compaction Subsurface drainage installation SUMMARY: The three proposed single family residences (on Lots 2, 3, and 4) are geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the Michel Construction Page nine recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans and key geotechnical inspection during construction. CLOSURE: The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. X 'Oe)o 0 Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. Geotechnical/Civil Engineer DMB:vIb T-` -i, :a 1 70TH� PL o w T 17214D sw -i ;,", , el. 71 S1 kY- 4� ..... . 172ND _,,T SW > E 12, S T 17 PL Sw 175TH 7 S �T -K. N6TH jai ST 76TH <i 77TH �S� SW I 1 1 7ETq E-sw -I- —IwosT Sw PA PX T p Sw 178fH P L SNOHOt1,1SH Sw A COUNTY 18 S1 ST CHR1-S11;,,,, 7— S�' F HS i lei Pt S* 180TH 181ST Sj Sw E.. P, Sw ST _-x PL N Sk, ST TE a Sw 182.,D ..S'ST X S, ST :J Sw 181 Sr 1 B'� �,r , _ a, PL SkIl 182ND �7 f83Rb a —'a ST !184TH 185 7 1 185T, 8 Iti i �, —51f, ST Sw 185TH E F 1 .1 L Sw ]SET 1H PL w -L8ST P, Sv 31 F A8TH a 'y U; 77 T �v 18�17H I ­q ST PL S" PL SW S, a ST ST SW 7 -­Y- 189TH sv; ST Sw lecT. ST S�, DALE PL S6, 0' PK 'KT —SW 1 J 5,T PL Sw 190TH ILM T Sw T 191ST 7' ST Sw PA, 192ND L:�RD PL P, Sw ST C) C\J S, ID i" LAKE 1 1�'T!LST SW <> S 105TH ST SW PL SW I S,: 196TH KILO" PL S,�l ST Sw pi, 19ZTH ST SW !jI SCRIBER 196TH HEINZ 19: TH Sw Ln 4 TH ST SW TH S -i CO 192TH LAKE pARK L-. % PT Sw ST--SW- ST SW 232ND no! sT T Sw L ST r- SW i c i'2 PL Sw 02 D ST 201ST PL 7'Y Sw S T So: iE a �! COLLEGE >1 Sw 2ND 204TH .203RD SW r) Sw 204TH < T & P, 2 Sw -JR HS CTH ST 20 PO C 207TH PL Sw "I —TLs� 7�7 -T- 208 H > 1SW CTI SW IM �,21 PK: 209TH ST * 1 i < 21 211TH'ST 219'rw: S�'l t, M—W Sw '-Tr 7, -�S T -C ST S� Sw T. 213TH PL' a 212TH T 21,7 Sw H PL Sw a; Sl 21;,H S1 �T --STA� a y -- t� Z�, 4 ST I ST[iFNS YXIP!4� 21( ST S7 TH > CD ST Sw ko T91H-F sw 'TH 218 P, < 21 H ST SE " , - I �t!UH 11 21 L 216- 220TH ST Sw ?"-p-SI S. ST 5, 219� 220TH TH 1: 'ST S4 - =r SW 22- ; Pk MST UTV. z ST ST 5- S. EM .,W-K LONS 22"14D �T E3 ct� ---------- — ---------- bult m TIC, �r. I t3AC 2 'n U 13.469 5.). FT I C116`lllela�" �2 p4o- 50' r (Gr' I 1 50 F (1 '3. )j.7 cur ao.m. t 3 1 4r.vri rw T', I D VIL UP PUNOFF f cr 26.990 �0. F 12e.74- V , IT Y 2C/,'610 511. F T/ f I L "I $ 10, 6" C� 3. -n C13 3 Cal 14" Of la -vq 4r. 'A 224.04 11 7 1, i-Tn 7�1 22, "6 721— ED; TKAe-T A I N 69'01'34- E 4*71 50i PLOTPLAN NJ FT. (GRO5 F�. (IN KS-1 1,995.14 ft2 LD N Ni (13 A -P-anf. USED A --'4-E-- WR�SID = 5.59'1 --32 0. o ol 25' C) 154 �2 475.50'1 LD Lo N E) c"'y c"""PLOT PLAN SCALED: I"= 20' 14 i lb 29,040 5.0,. FT/ 4b T�E OF15LOF� 1 199.27' LD i 11 Ll L0 o C\j c\J C) Q L0 c\I co c\j El— C I E E ". 'i DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTA. CITY OF 7iPT .9 NO:. 947'... City of Edmonds PERMIT EXPIRES PC. SIDE SEWER PERMIT am Address of Construction: 76 X, 1,,'C 9/,LIID # Property Tax Account'Parcel'No. _0 ;I /,Yo Attach copies of all access and utility -easements /5,4Verified and Aporo V*ed b Owner and/or Contractor: Contractor License uilding Permit 00 Single Family invasion into City *Right -of Way: E] Yes N4N 0 Multi -Family (No. otunits *RW Construction Permit F] Commercial (No. of Units Cross other "Private Property: Ej Yes No - El Public "Attach legal description and'c6py of recotdAd *easemept. Owher/Contractor Owner or contractor signature and. acknowledgement statemerif.­ Date By signing for this permit I certify that I have read the City's public. handout entitled ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. I-®r CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1--800-425-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION-V W'FOR INSPECTION CALL. 425-171-0220 extension ?329:-W HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REOUESTS .......... . .... .. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . .. ... . ......... . Permit Foo Repair Fee.$— Issued By: Trunk Charge Date Issued: $ A lo 77 Assessment Fee Receipt No: City Permit Surcharge Fee $5.00 Total Foes Paid NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS, NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN. INSPECTOR ARRIVES.- A $45.RE-INSPECTION FEE WILL. BE CHARGED.. Job Site* Ready YES NO. Date:. 7- Initial:—. Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: V P F artial Inspection: Date: Initial:, FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: bate: L/:1 Initial:'D/T. As-buil : t to Street File: t�, PERMITMUST BE POSTED ON JOB -SITE. White Copy: File Green'Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;�Idg;forrns;sspennitjlg4/00 C/o C/o 18, Li 62' r-1 -F u Li —31 T- C/o ppe WSISWr' ,jU 17,4 T q .-,, cu numlpq to 40 --'41 1@41A 10 k.,jW A lUJJ0 A?lu U1111t; Ili!- to L,- [1113 '01 p oluil jou inq tu:-- JUOPLadaPUl H —�o q;�lv-3 in AuV AW GtV-10 ql;� lou Smpspu! -;.� DWA P 40 04 -,'-'l'Lllp] jo Alio e4l j�q asn ,cl 'A u CITY D F EDMONDS SI-D.E SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS 17409 76TH AVE w PERMIT NUMBER 9 4 7 1) HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR MICHEL CONST, DATE 06/07/01. DRAWN ISMAEL ABILA BY Co 0 CD U �u co .41E) /- / � rill. wm w IMMEN 'Z!, Lu 25- Ce to �2 Cq 11 C) w 4 Co -0 0 -z r- ...... 0 SITE PLAN 2.09, 0 1,eN 88'40'2�- 0 RS-12 42.67' 1 - RS-20 C 'k C' ............. I ..................................................... . .......... N .......... .......... \ 1"' C (TYP.). 10.. :to o.,o.-. r I"- 4V rJEAS11%4 SEIDEM 12,1946 q.i� (gross SCALE ,;,4,11 6th AVEJ W. Rr —1 9,151 sq.ft, (in .1 un 1q i 'k, -'o z 40 60 80 0 .20 9yf 7 L' 1 .1 't2j6.960 sq;ft. 13.469 shl ft. 16 Lj> N $9-01-34- W .117 0 ... . ............. A A HA-4 X4 HA -I;= HA-i' ) " �A.* 2 ......... ......... I ............ .... ... I T ... ..... * i 20,04b sciAl ! 40- -qr Ai z I B LCWi ; 1,31 140.31' 45.12' L=1 1P.13' t. T 6EA0F C -4 u' TRACTA (PRIV '3, Sz 7 91A s cci. ... .. . ' ' -C4=,- 1 .... ... .. ....... ........ . ........... 11 z 27L 0 10'89*01'34" W .475.501 r C, oq CV -;? CV F C., I -P LEGEND HA-1 NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HAND AUGERS A A A CROSS-SECTION A -A! FIGURE NEL,§ON-couvRErrE & ASSOCIATES, INC. HEMP SHORT PLAT 2 Q01.11W GEOM000M Elwawffft. GMOWM I ENYPDNWNM SCOn" =1 E MO. DATE Reference: Site plan created ftm a site plan entitled 'Preliminary Short Subdivision for Peter L Hemp," prepared by 145795 MARCH 1995 Lovell-Sauerland & Associates. Inc., dated December 1, 1994. TnE ET FILE City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Applicant: I Peter I— Hemp Determination;9: I CA-95-9 Project N2mc: nemp S1 . ior�l �Stibdiivision Permit NIumber: F Site Location: 1 17411 76th Av. N. Properly Tax Acct 9: 1 5131-000-141-0407 Project Description .non -project specific A s,tc'ns, I ' I pcction of the propeii), has revealed a steep slope xvhich may be as steep or steeper than 300/c and there is more than 20 feet of vertical elevation gain. Based on the above findings, it is determined that There is potential for critical areas on or adjacent to the site. A Critical Areas Study is required to delineate the boundaries of the potential critical area� its buffers and setbacks. A licens(d surveyor must create a topograpmc map of the site which indicates all areas which slope 30% or more and have a vertical gain of 20 feet or more v.ithin the 30% slopes. The map must also show the location of the buffer associated with the steep slope. If the prop" owner wishes toapply for 2 specific development permit which they feel would not impact the Cri(ic-RI Areas located on the sitc� they may submit their proposal to the.Planning Department for review. If the.Planning Department finds that the proposed devc1opment permit will not adversely impact a Critical Area or its buffers, a conditional waiver may be issued on a project by project basis. I Nrinish Name Jsniisry 20, 199-5 Signature Date EC E T a'VELOPMEN i - ­ . �jji' CITY 0� C) L0 LD N IN 0 n N &�-40'27' W 625 2, 0,9' ,q A%;j DEVELC)pM CITY 4�&T SERft;:s Cy.R. OF 215 FILE 13,469 FT. to NING �IED AN AIR 01 A� ....... �B 7.714m;, 4 Av Aoz�vyl LU Lij L0 P0 C) 0 C) A OROVED 0 / P //z Z / ll �, I IN In 220 IN 898.94 ft2 =55.59' 7.24y 20.001 R=20. W A E R, 455 675 W1 OT 2 3, ��4 L6'N PLOT PLAN SCALE 1"= 20' c\j RECEIVED I . CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS MAILING ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME j ADDRESS "�y CITY ZIP TEL�EPHONE x" 1� NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP TELEPHONE STATE LICENSE N UMBER EXPIRATI rON DATE CHECK 7 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH ID ADDITION Ej COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE REMODEL 0 APARTMENT SIGN GRADING FENCE ft L. 5 PERMIT EXPIRES Q'4(01014. USE PERMIT 21 Cy- 3761 NUMBER JOB ADDRESS 7'4�9 1 74� 7 SUITE/APT# PLAT NAM E/SUBDIVI SION NO. LOT NO. LID NO 01 LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIJL STREET MAP -) TESCP Approved 0 RW Permit Required 0 - , Street Use Permit Req'dW 0 �/e EXISTING inspection Required IPQ SideWalk Requlredk� REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Underground Wiring required ME�F� SIJE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED �4 S YE _)� NO z 1-3, E REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE W J ENGINEERING R;VIEWfD/DATE 65 FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE U) LL BY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION BOND RERD POSTED I OYES kNO SEPA REVIEW C OMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED HEIGHT ALLOWED PROPOS'ED I , EXP LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR o' z z PARKING REOD PROViDED LOT AREA PLAN G'�EVIEW�?.Bj DATE I L_j REPAIR CYDS . X FT) Ivi L_j ( C] DEMOLISH 0 TANK f—I OTHER inGARAGE RETAINING WALL GAfIPCRT ROCKEIRY 0 RENEWAL (TYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: C NUMBER NUMBER OF. CRITICAL OF DWELLING AREAS STORIES UNITS NUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE At CHECKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT 1177- GROU &Ia_ SPECIAL INSP TOR AREA CCUPANT CC tA REQUIRED YES sc, I Cl V CAD H EAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % %4 PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE e-'V-35_5"' THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Uj PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS PERMIT LIMIT'. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS W IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND M ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE _j DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 1 1 ." .1 NOR LIMIT IN ANYWAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE A NY ORDINANCE PROV SON I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. NATURE (OWN7R 0f34GEl`+Q_ DATE SIGNED ATTENTION IT IS VNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE ANO APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 5/98 REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D CV VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE (a) 0' BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL GRADING/FILL STATE SURCHARGE ENG. REVIEW FEES & 7Z ENG. INSPECTION FEE -LAND86APING, 'NSPECTION"FEE P PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT RECEIPV 2_3 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE RE fEIPT f APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not apermit until signed by the CALL Builpl�ng Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. OFFICIALS SIGNATURE- DAIE (425) 771-0220 J.,FfELEASED BY DA* . EXT333 771-0221. ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - INSPECTOR FAX. PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR CITY Of EDMONDS SINGLE FAMILY/DUPLEX COVER SHEET Directions: Applicants are to complete the Information In the WHITE BOXES ONLY (Shaded boxes are for City . so on I y ). This cover shoot must accompany each building permit application for a how single-lamily residence. . . PROJECTADDRESS 17-401 7&4vy_,A1 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL # DESCRIPTION OF WOR K _!�=Azeji 3�7jt OWNER Ajlgk�,$ PHONE CONTACT PERSON ayt&Hr PHONE -776-27W E-MAIL FAX 776-'70194 MAILING ADDRESS FAX CORRECTIONS MAIL CORRECTIONS E-MAIL CORRECTIONS :Y SIGNING THIS STATEMENT I UNDERSTAND THAT I Ail THE CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS PROJECT. 17 IS MY ESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE ALL SUBMITTALS WITH THE CITY AND ONLY I CAN MAKE INQUIRIES ON THE ST A TUS OF THE APPLICATION. I UNDERSTAND IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IN ADVANCE OF PERMIT 8 UBMITTAL ANY DISCRETIONARY PERMITS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE SUBMITTED ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION IN ORDER TO MAKE A COMPLETE APPLICATION AND NO DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED. SIGNATURE AV16 H I- DATE Or-( 'IF -00 ZONING INFORMATION.. ZONE LOT A13EA 13 ­91 NUMBER OF DWELLING:,11NITS' EXISTING -0- DEMOLISHED PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY APPROV . AL . S CA Determination SUBDIVISION CU VARIANCE SHORELINE SEPA_ Expires __ OTHER City Use Only LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION EXISTING SF PROPOSED SF2,5/4,V4V_TOTAL SF7-514 9,tll'� % HEIGHT CALCULATION INFORMATION C. 0201, DATUM _641VNAVA01? /17. 00, A2441S AVE- 5'. 74 MAX A C T U A L Z-00. SETBACK INFORMATION kEQ IIRED FRONT -75 SIDE ID, I SIDE* /0 1 REAR 2_51 —7o­r7— si PROPOSED FRONT 2-S' SIDE DE /0' REAR 7- CNR LOT y:ES NO FLAG%LO . T YES NO -ST, DEDI E JRNOL��T`: c-Ely S ADU STATEMENT RE�4l� YES (RHO RECORDING IF STAFF COMMENTS: ENGINEERING INFORMATION DRIV . EWAY SLOPE % GRADING CYDS J�&O eYCIS EASEMENTS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1977 A14 SO.FT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA INSTALLED 1977 OR LATER tV4 SQ.FT. PROPOSED NEW NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE City Use Only SIDEWALK REQUIRED [:]YES []NO DRAINAGE PLAN REQUIRED [:]YES []NO UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED []YES [:]NO STREET DEDICATION FT. LID# STAFF COMMENTS: SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT (City Use Only) SOILS, STRUCTURAL: EISTART.OF WORK E]PLACEMENT OF REINFORCEMENT f'tcXCAVATION 11 GRADING OPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE 94 HORING INSTALLATION & MONITORING El BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE PROOF ROLLING 0STRUCTURAL MASONRY PLACEMENT OF FILL & COMPACTION STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION LaSUBSURFACE DRAINAGE OHIGH STRENGTH BOLTING 19VERIFY SOIL BEARING WELDING (WABO CERTIFIED ONLY) PI.LEPLACEMENT 0OTHER EROSIONCONTROL GENERAL SITE MONITORING BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD 14GENERALSITE M'ONI . TORING BY THE EOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD 'DURING WET WEATHER CONSTRUCTION FINAL,GRADING & FI , ELD REPORT OTHER APPLICANT 01(_t7lIll� PLAN CHECK 0 /-or Z. 5P 16q 21 DATE RECEIVED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION CODE EDITIONS 1997 UBC. UMC. UPC, WSEC, VIAO WITH AMENDMENTS DESIGN CRITERIA WIND EXPOSURE 8 WIND SPEED 80 MPH SEISMIC ZONE 3 Floor Live Load Roof Snow/Live Load Balcony Live Load Floor Dead Load Roof Dead Load Balcony Dead Load - NUMBER OF STORIES 2- BASEMENTS A1,4 FLOOD ZONE LOT SLOPE S ILS tIEPAF�T PROVIDED [] YES [] No FLOOR AREA (MEASURED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALL) Existing Proposed Total Living Space Garage Carport Dock/Covered Porch Otller� ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION FUEL TYPE GAS, OIL [] ELECTRIC 1:1 OTHER FORCED AIR [:]HEAT PUMP [:]HYDRONIC []OTHER ENERGY CODE METHOD OF COMP LIANCE el PRESCRIPTIVE: List Option 13 TARGET UA APPROACH: Provide UA Calcuations El SYSTEMS ANALYSIS: Provide Computer Analysis ENERGYIVENTILATION WORKSHEETS PROVIDED WINDOW SCHEDUL E PROVIDED FOR CITY USE ONLY Coiling Insulation--f Wall Insulatio Floor Insulati n Door U-Value �t Window U -Value-L& Skylight U.Value__. Glazing VENTILATION CODE COMPLIANCE INFORMATION KITCHEN FAN CFM BATHROOM FAN(S) CFM_5a LAUNDRY FAN CFM LO 0 SYSTEM WHOLE HOUSE VENTILATION IVEXHAUST OPTION FRESH AIR TO BE PROVIDED TO WINDOW VENTS QJL 1K] WALL PORTS EACH HABITABLE ROOM WITH: EXHAUST FAN TO BE CONTROLLED WITH 24 HOUR TIMER AND SIZED AS FOLLOWS: FI - 2 BEDROOMS: 50 - 75 CFIM -I 4 BEDROOMS: 100 - 150 CFIM 0 � 3 BEDROOMS: 80 - 120 CFM El 5 BEDROOMS: 120-180 CFIM C3 HVAC INTEGRATED OPTION DEDICATED HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATION OPTION -7 SEPARATE PERMITS (City Use Only) E]RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT []MECHANICAL PERMIT CIENCROACHMENT PERMIT 0PLUMBING PERMIT ELECTRICAL PERMIT ., 0 WATER METER I;TATE EN . CE PERMIT 13SIDE SEWER PERMIT []RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER PERMIT E]IFIRIGATION (SPRINKLER SYSTEM) [3OTHER 0OTHER Any request lor modification, variance or other administrative deviation (herinafter "variance*) must be specifically Called out and Identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions �hich do not comply with the city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified. requested and considered by the appropriate city official In accordance with the appropriate provision of city code of state low does not approve any items not to code specification. PERMITISSUANCE AP OV S� PLANNING REVIEW & APPROVAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Wiy Be Only) DATE EN . GINEERING R.EVIEW& APPRO�Al, C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: DATE]jZ" BUILDING REVIEW & APPROVAOJZ_15(12�i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: JA f>ATE ESC Minimum Reauirement - Stabilization of Exposed Areas. All soils exposed by land disturbing activities shall be stabilized by suitable application of BMP's, including but not limited to, sod, hydroseeding, or other vegetation, plastic covering, or mulching. All BIVIP's shall be selected, designed, and maintained in accordance with the Manual. The exposed soils shall be stabilized according to an approved timetable. (Typically, no soils shall remain exposed for more than two (2) days from October 1 through April 30 and no more than seven (7) days from May 1 through September 30). 20, 30' 2 0'_ I 1ASPHAL F Ii M 11 X -EL 197.8; SIDE 0­11 SEWER CONNECTION M M WITH MAIN X X > M EX CB M GE 207.11 M I E 2 0 4.61 (E) Z 0 I 0 co -0 M 0 _j < '0 Cf) M (n _j > CA r- < M r- M > a_ CC) ZE 11< 1ILL, > M/ F% C/) M < �D 0 M 9 M 0 0 _0 CD < ;;0 M > _X 20' C 1 30' 00 Z __� M M -Z I 11 W __j Cf) M --q -t� -< /_ - CA > C) r- U) M > M cc) --- I > ED r- 0 0 C X C #8, TYPE 1 E 213.68 E 209.86 11 L EX CB GE 2112.85 IE 2Q3.51 30 EX CB C151 GE 2112.99 OD 2T 75 '00 11 0 IE 20 Zl+i 240 235 230 225 220 215 210 Iu 13 _� 1i TO L_ CONNE�T TO IOUTSIDE DROP SEC 8, TNP 27N, RNG 4E, W.M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: t A portion of Tract 141, Plot of Meadowdale Beach, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 5 of Plats, page 38, records of Snohomish County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Plot of Meadowdale Estates, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 18 of Plats, page 77, records of Snohomish County, Washington, said point of beginning bein� also the Northeast corner of Tract 141; THENCE South 01*24'51 ' West along the Easterly line of said Tract 141, 190.38 feet; Thence' North 89*01'34" West 164.16 feet to the true point of beginning; STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED '7 PLAYFULDS 169T"� P, SW it w. Pt. )y THENCE continuing North 89'01'34 West, 475.50 feet to the SW A 172NO PL FL Easterly line of 76th Avenue West as recorded under Auditor's 141' 9 4�. "' " . ' - I... H \ " ;"i 174T" S, - I - � 173RD PL W 175TH S� = 4 . W o' File N o. 7809140254; 17 P T 174TH ;L S1 SW - Q * 'r ST I TH SW I IT THENCE North 00*08'15" East, along said Easterly line 194.51 feet C**Ty 1111TH SI W iV� PAW to the Southwest corner of said Plat of Meaclowdale Estates; M. III. loot" T S I T E ARM. ST ; . �1 �j SW THENCE South 88*39'36" East along the Southerly line of sold Plot MA I lot It Sm iv I ST j . WHI. .. I r of Meadowdale Estates, 352.08 feet to the Southwest corner of jn)ftq.� IF Vj_FIL _X_; I 1,4N Isis rL - --- - n - R I - _3�. lot- T. N1 *X -v i IT P 4, 1 'MOZZIL Sul SW _114 ".f% ..� said Lot 14 of said Plot of Meadowdole Estates; J�_ 1.16 IN" so V THENCE South 01*24'51" West, 92.17 feet; FL SW THENCE South 89' 01'34" East 127.73 feet; 188TH FEWY III Rpe 7q. PIL SW SW PL sw, L7 pt 91 _M lo; cc I 102TH. St Sht FS V,,� I?DTH -- ST SW THENCE South 01*24'51" West, 100.00 feet to the point of beginning. I8jTJJ(, RE-— L !Wmi W­ - III '0,�4Vr t; X TL SW PS at Pt Z I?zw PL Sm jn!!y SW 11� Z� l"M 7 -Affc I (ALSO KNOWN AS Lot D of Short Plat recorded under Recording No. 9E . .1 Ilya C3 1W ft it 104TV $I SW 4, t6 - j 7809140255 and revised under Recording No. 8008270140.) -1 SW "r, : . __5 FRID X. � I OrTH V� ,01' .4 �+. ". Situate in the County of Snohomish, State of Washington. IE 231.95, INSTALL CLEAN OUT AT END OF 6" SEWER IE 223.47 @ CONNECTION IE 228.77 @ CONNECTION WITH SIDE SEWER, LOT 2 WITH SIDE SEWER, LOT 3 7- INSTALL C.O.--,-z GE 231.02 IE 227�y INSTALL C.O.----i GE 222.13 1 E /219. 4 5 INSTALL C.C. GE 214.41 0 IE 211.75 @ B-915% CMp @ 7.1)411 7. 065% @ 7.70605% 2r p\/c(3034) 'J.2() 205 - I 0+00 0+25 1+25 1+50 1+75 2+ 2+50 245 240 235 230 225 220 215 210 205 3+50 VICINITY MAP r--GRADING QUANTITIES: 1,387 CU YDS OF C UT 1,068 CU YDS OF FILL \0 DATUM: OCA RIM OF CATCH BASIN AT FLOWLINE OF FACE OF CURB AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SITE, ELEV. = 352.66 0 1.r) (D (0 t4r) c). c) C-1 (IV (IV (\4 (IV N CC) (IV 0) 20' 8" CMP @ 17.9% w/ 3:1 BEVEL END TO PICKUP RUNOF� FROM STREAM/DITCH CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. CALL FOR PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH CITY OF EDMONDS SITE INSPECTION, (425)771-0220. 2. CALL DIALDIG(UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER) 1-800-424-5555. 3. ERECT FILTER FABRIC FENCE & INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE. 5. ROUGH GRADE SITE PER GRADING PLAN. 6. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER PER PLAN. 7. INSTALL OTHER UTILITIES: STORM, WATER, GAS, POWER, TELEPHONE, ROCKERY, ROAD, ETC. 8. FINAL GRADE AND PAVE. REMOVE CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM POND(SILT, ETC.)PRIOR TO STABILIZING SITE. 9. HYDROSEED, MULCH, AS NECESSARY. 10. REMOVE THE REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ONLY AFTER THE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED AND CITY OF EDMONDS SITE DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE REMOVAL. C/) W E­ 0 Z (3 0 L J C", r, co !;z _j n U) Cl) 1 1W, g LO r- V� r, V) 0 - to Z to 000 m 0 LU �4 C) _j c-4 C,4 C14 LO C) 0 ry 0 V) ry ILLJ C- n < I < C� n LLJ < I-- F-- 0:� U) r-) Z 0 LLI LLJ LA F_ < M M Z Z 0 V) Ld Of Q0 0 V_ (D Q0 LO N N 0 ,Q- (J� 00 C)-) n > 00 < 0-) 0 4-J 0 < n,- I cr) Q) 0 -1-CO U) Cn r-- 6 ry �_ = -0 n �7 Cn C- 0 :�i 1 1 E 1110 Vi V) _j ui Z < CD U N V) _j < 0 V) U) 0 11 > %. rw_� 173rd Si Sw a -4, -', Pi deT% i iL 41 h of >I oton It P1 sw 7L h laut P ew J�2nd S' 4� iwtd er �34 st 185th pf sw` IL I "wv'r I C I N I T Y M A"_'"F'� L0 Lf) c\j N tc) c\j N (N N A&-40- 2711 w 215 220 10, 61, CMP a 3.80% C[3 #5, TYPE 1 GE 225.46 IE 221.46 lo, 13,46915Q. FT. to A�.. a a 0/0 m a 0 0 0 N�B LD V 5EWER 9 7.ro.7,5 % W1 5TUL35 TO LOT 2, 5, �-/4 C5 #3, TYPE 1 G�_2-25_.04 Tt 224.04, co a 4 ok L-_27 =20.001 94".. Ld 00 N 89001',5/411 E L0 K) to c\] N _` P OT `LAN N L r DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' 1. LOT201798'121 2. PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LOT 2 OF 5131-000-141-1405 3. VICINITY MAP (SEE TMS PAGE) 4. NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR 17409 76TH ST. S.W. EDMONDS, WASI­IINGTON 98026 5. OWNER: MICTiEL CONSTRUCTION INC. - 7907 212TH ST. S.W. #102 EDMONDS, WA. 98026 776-2211 6. CONSTRUCTION DRAWING: MICHEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. 7907 212TH ST. S.W. #102 EDMONDS, WA. 98026 776-2211 7. STRUCTURAt ENGINEER: WENDELLREED, 8311 212TH ST S.W. EDMONDS, WA. 98026 546-9217 8. CIVIL ENGINEER: DENNIS M. BRUCE, P.E. P.O. BOX 55502 SHORELINE, WA. 98155 546-9217 9. GEOTECFINICAL ENGINEER: DENNIS M. BRUCE, P.E. P.O. BOX 55502, WA. 98155 546-9217 10. LEAD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL/CONTACT PERSON: DWIGHT MCGREW 776-2211 11. ZONING: Ra! la,13,469 SQ.FT. 12. TOTAL NUD�bER OF DWELLING UNITS 1 13. ACTUAL LOT, COVERAGE = 2,541.87/13,469= 19% 14. MECHANICAL SYSTEM: FORCED AIR RHEEM 80% GAS FURNACE RGDG-05,80,000 BTU 15. WIND EXPO,��RE B, SEISMIC ZONE 3, SOIL: 200OPSF 16. OCCUPANCY: GROUP R ' DIVISION 3 TYPE V/N. 17. COMPLIANCE PATH: COMPONENT PERFORMANCE APPROACH GLAZING= 16.90% 18. GLA7,ING U.. VALUE =.380, DOOR U VALUE.=.400, CEILING R VALUE=38, WALL R VALUE=19, SLAB R VALUE=10 19. COMPLY Wrl7H UBC, UPC, UMC, UFC, VIAC, AND WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODES 20. LOT SLOPE= 2.5% E-W 21. CA FILE NUMBER 95-9 22. ADB NUMBER N.A. 23. SET BACKS: FRONT 25', SIDE 10', REAR 25' 24. IMPERV. SURFACE AREA; DRIVEWAY 898.94 SQ. FT. RESIDENCE 2541.87 SQ. FT., PATIO 154.00 SQ.FT. 25. FMIGHT CALCS FOR 17409.(A 218.35 + B 230.02 + C 230.56 + D 224.12) = 225.76' 26. DATUM POINT: SAN SEVVER MAN HOLE ON 76TH ST. SW 197.80' 27. NLAX HEIGHT:-25', MEASURED FROM AVERAGE ELEVATION OF UNDISTURBED SOIL AT CORNERS OF EXTENDED 0 0 BUILDING RECTANGLE, SUBJECT TO FIELD CHECK BY BUILDING DEPARTMENT :4 28. TRANSIT SHALL BE SET UP FOR INSPECTOR AT FRAMING INSPECTION TO CHECK HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE. 0 29.. LOT LINES STAKES MUST BE IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION 30. ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE POSTED PAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM STREET OR ROAD FRONTING PROPERTY. 31. ALL NEW EXTENDED, RE -BUILT OR RELOCATED ELECTRICAL UTILITY AND.OR SERVICE SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND 32. ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLE\JE MATERIAL SCH 40 PVC OR EQUIV, SDR 34. (ASTM D3TM D3034) "VARIANCE") u 33. ANY REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION, VARIANCE OR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE DEVIATION (HEREINAFTER MUST BE SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT AND IDENTIFIED. APPROVAL OF ANY PLAT OR PLAN CONTAINING PROVISIONS 0 WFUCH DO NOT COMPLY WITH CITY CODE AND FOR WHICH A VARIANCE HAS NOT BEEN SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED, RE- QUESTED AND CONSIDERED BY TT­IE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE PROVISION OF CITY CODE OR STATE LAW DOES NOT APPROVE ANY ITEMS NOT TO CODE SPECIFICATION.. iLD_11,§�JG INP-0 21 TOF!5OIL A% la k- , &,,� , �P@g (5EE 501L LOG KIN't, FILTER FA15RIC NEL5ON-COUVREi ORGANIC 5F 5M NCA # 145795 IN' F EE DRAINING 1-1/4 5HOKT PLAT FIL M ............ GRANULAR FILL 2s 4" PERF. DRAIN PIPE TRENCH SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1' COVER 5HEET- Fl 51TE PLAN & DUILDING HEIGHT CALC5 VICINITY MAP FLOOR AREA OUMMARY PROJECT INFORMATION ARCHITECTURAL: Al bUILDING ELEVATION5 A2 13IJILDING ELEVATION5 A3 FIR5T FLOOR PLAN A4 5ECOND FLOOR PLAN 5TRUCTURAL DRAWINGS: 51 FOUNDATION5 / FIR5T FLOOR FRAMING PLAN E32 5ECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN 53 ROOF FRAMING PLAN 54 DETAII-5 55 GENERAL NOTE5 CIVIL DRAWING5: Cl 5TORM DRAINAGE, ER06ION C2 51TE CRO55 5ECTION5 5ITE ARCHITECTURAL: Ll LAN[)5CAPE PLAN LANDOCAFE 5CHEDULE 10 co CD z u zco C7\ 0 C) < 3: Z 0 c) Lu 0 (D 6.15.00 REVISIONS: GI)y �7�3 J