17415 76 AVE- Geotech Report.pdfJ. KEITH CROSS, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineering Consultant
(425) 747-2150 STRE
P.O. Box 1986, Bellevue, Washington 98009-1986
May 31, 2015
Brian Boggess
Roberta Stady
Carole Altomari swc
19317 142nd Avenue SE
Renton, Washington 98058 0104
Geotechnical Engineering Prior -to -Salle Site Reconnaissance, Vacant Lot, 17415 76th
Avenue W (aka Lot B), Edmonds, Washington Project No. 9526-001
This letter is prepared to provide a summary of a brief geotechnical engineering site
reconnaissance and data review related to geotechnical engineering issues associated with the
subject property. On the morning of May 18, 2015, 1 made a visit to the above referenced site to
observe the general geotechnical related site conditions. After having done some prior research
of readily available geotechnical data and mapping, I walked around the lot and observed the
general conditions. At the site visit, the neighbor to the east followed me around and related
some of his experiences related to permitting for his carport.
The subject property is located in the northern portion of the Perrinville area of Edmonds
Washington. At the specific property location and nearby toward the west, the ground is
relatively gently sloping. Steeper slopes are located east of the site and a short distance to the
west. This terrain was created by a combination of tectonics, glacial sculpting and erosive
processes along the shorelines of Puget Sound. I have reviewed the agricultural soil mapping
and geologic mapping for the site, and site vicinity. The agricultural soil mapping obtained from
the Web Soil Survey site of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service indicates that the
site is underlain by Alderwood group soils. These agricultural soils are indicated to be developed
on a glacial till substrate. Geologic mappings of the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds
Quadrangels by Makey Smith, 1975, and James P. Minard, 1983, somewhat agree with the
agricultural soil mapping, indicating either a glacial till or the underlying advance outwash sands
as the substrate. Detailed soil boring information was not available in the accessible State of
Washington database for sites in the immediate vicinity. ,
Glacial till is usually described as a mixture of silt, sand and gravel with scattered cobbles and
boulders that has been clensified by overriding glacial ice to a very dense condition, similar to
weak concrete. The advance outwash sands are typically a fine to coarse sand with varying
Letter to Brian Boggess
Project No. 9526-001
May 31, 2015
Page 2
amounts of gravel and silt. These sands were deposited in advance of the most recent glacier as
it expanded southward into the Puget Sound trough. They have also been densified by
overriding glacial ice to a very dense condition. At the site, I observed piles of sand and gravel
mixtures that had been dug up by burrowing animals. These piles could be the product of either
the glacial till or a gravelly outwash phase. With the indications of previous development on the
lot, likely including plowing for farm and nursery products, near surface soils are likely to be
mixed and disturbed. Soils exposed as fill along the access drive along the south side of the
property appeared to be derived from a glacial till source. The near surface soils also appeared
to have a high organic content in areas which is likely to be associated with the reported previous
agricultural usage of the property.
The western portion of the property contains a series of low concrete walls that are reported to
be associated with previous greenhouse structures. There is also a pile of metal debris in the
northwestern corner of the property. Vegetative cover on the property consists of a few trees
and overgrown laurel, in addition to invasive blackberry and other scrub growth. Grasses and
other "ground cover" type vegetation were scattered around the property.
One of the concerns that was expressed that instigated my site reconnaissance was the reported
presence of water on the site. While there are suggestions of periodic standing water in areas
around the old greenhouse structure, the predominance of the water that I observed was
associated with channelized water directed onto the site from properties upslope to the east. The
most significant amount of this water was along the access roadway that runs across the
southern margin of the property. Water is running in a well defined ditch on the south side of the
access drive on the property to the east and the eastern 1/3 to 1/2 of the subject property. At
that point the water enters a culvert which runs northward beneath the roadway to a ditch on the
north side of the roadway, parallel to the roadway. This water appears to enter a buried storm
water drain system near the western property line, just north of the roadway. The property owner
to the east told me that there are several sources of channelized water from the east, some of
which are being used by other neighbors to the south to provide the water source for ponds on
their properties. There is a similar less well defined ditch, along the south side of the access
roadway for properties to the north, which is also directing offsite water onto the subject site.
This water flows along the north margin of the site toward the northwest property corner, where a
portion of the water flows over the pavement to the north side of that roadway. It was unclear
how the developers of these properties to the north expected to provide control of their
channelized water, without impacting the subject property. However, I understand that you would
J. KEITH CROSS, P.E. P.O. Box 1986, Bellevue, Washington 98009-1986
Letter to Brian Boggess
Project No. 9526-001
May 31, 2015
Page 3
have a legal right to keep adverse behavior from effecting your property by continuing to control
this water. A sketch of these drainage features is attach to this letter. This sketch is not to scale
and is intended to only provide a conceptual representation of the channelized water flow that
passes through the subject lot. Indications of ground water seepage not associated with these
controlled drainages was not observed at my site visit.
Other than keeping the water that is being directed toward the lot under control, there do not
appear to be significant technical geotechnical issues that should adversely impact the potential
conventional residential construction on the subject lot. The lot does not appear to be in an area
that would be expected to be impacted by the typical landsliding that occurs in the Puget Sound
lowland. The geologically mapped soils are expected to provide a level of residential foundation
support that provides for a quality level of performance. As with any lot that has previously been
subject to human activity, there may be site disturbances and/or buried conditions that will not be
readily apparent until new site development activities are undertaken. Removal of previous
usage features should be expected to be part of the site development process.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for my work, I warrant that my work has
been done in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this
report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If there are any
questions concerning this report, or if I can provide additional services, please call.
Yours very truly,
J. Keith Cross, P.E.84 4 At
y :.
,rr
CONAL
J. KEITH CROSS, P.E. P.O. Box 1986, Bellevue, Washington 98009-1986
M anuana y,9L
i
U
N
L.
co
,i1
0)
cu
cl
L
-1--+
cu
U
cu
`t
U
cis
U
CO)
O
0
c
. p
W o
CL
N
0)
U r
Z
y U O
Y o cc
a'
BCL2