The URL can be used to link to this page

17808 TALBOT RD (2).PDF11111111111111 13460 ADDRESS.- z ZA /-- /-� Y:Z// /V,-) TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS:. DETERMINATION: 0 Conditional Waiver IzStudy Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:_ PERMITS (OTHER): CHECKLIST DATED: PLANNING DATA SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: 4,1 SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:-4d SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATEDJ Lp , (, I N I I q SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: QM�D dEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: 1 All AP) LATEMP\DS'Ps\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FTR F s EE T F_ILLE�J Name: -.e— DIA Date: Site Address: 1-7006 Plan Check It: Project escription- V_ZeV6.V\l1e_ ex' W"Ck'"VAkw"r. -4A Reduced Site Plan Provided: OYES NO) Zoning: MapPage: L105- Corner Lot: (YES QOJ Flag Lot: (YES Critical Areas Determination A-- 200-7-OK R1 Study Required �k El waiver V!4Z1b_ IC, eu SEPA Determination: C4 Exempt El Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) 0 Fee 0 Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form Required tbacks Street: S ��e: Sill-: I C .51 3�_ D Actual Setbacks I Street: Side: C 0 Side: D,, Rear: E] Detached Structures: a Rockeries: EA�-V" 114 ate.,,5 4A,.-"x r"�� El Fences/Trellises: El Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: El Stairs/Deck: Height Datum Point: WAV_ Datum Elevation: t 0 L? Maximum Height Allowed: Actual Height: Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: Lot Area: aofgV (Yuk� Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: Lot Coverage Calculations: -7 ADU Created: (YES / NO) Subdivision: Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / NO) Coruments Plan Review By: Planning Data Form 04-11-06.doc io CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwdedmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT IP C L) Planning - Building - Engineering November 21, 2007 Lloyd White PO Box 5003 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Subject: Determination regarding Critical Areas Checklist: CRA20070152 Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find a copy of the Critical Areas.Checklist you submitted GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR .The 'DETERMINATION" reached by the City is located on the reverse side of the form (bottom of page). IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO RETAIN A COPY OF THIS CRITICAL -AREAS "DETERMINATION" FOR YOUR RECORDS. Please examine this Determination for additional requirements. You may need to submit additional information such as an Environmental Checklist.or Critical Areas Study. The Determination for the Critical Areas Checklist you submitted is a site -specific determination,' not:a- project-specific determination. YOU MUST SUBMIT A COPY OF THE CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST and DETERMINATION WITH ALL PERMIT APPLICATIONS OR YOUR APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Permit applications include the following: Building Permits Conditional Use Permits Subdivisions Variances Applications to the ADB* Land Use Applications Any other development permit applications. Thank you, Planning Secretary C: Henry Byam *Architectural Design Board Enclosure RECEIVED JAN 2 0 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS C:�My Docunicills'LINDAlinda's CACL.doc Incorporated August 11, 1890 D'T #P20 of ED 4. �' 0+ City. of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 1, IS96 Date Received: I / 0 9 City Receipt M C F- A - 2-o 0 - + - D 1 Critical Areas File M Critical Areas Checklist Fee:. $135.-00 Date Mailed to Applicant:.. The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to A property owner, or his/her. authorized representative, be filled out 'by any person- preparing. a Development must'fill out the checklist� sip and date it� And &6brm*t it - Permit Application � for the City of Edmonds prior to to the City. The City -will review the checldist�'make a� -hisiber submittal oftbt application to &' City. 'precursory site visit, and make.. a determination of the lbe' subsequent steps necessary to complete a development purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to . t applicatioM, determine whether any potential Critical Areas are,''or . -Penm may be, present on the subject property. The information, y�map,,al9ng with -the s�ped copy Ple=.submit a yi.cihit needed * to complete ' the Checklist �should b.e easily of this form to assist City staff in finding #nd locating the. of the site di'dita available at: specific' -piece .,of ekiribed -oh"'this omL--: In -a-�ailableI-om observations". property d f, City Hill (Critical areas inventories, maps, or, soil addition, the., applicant;.% shall.J -include other pertinent surveys), infbrmation..�(6.g. �.pite . plan, to - ;map, etc.) or pogmphy 44di '."unction.wit.h this Checklist to assistant staff es _;n mc .. M I plefing'their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and assips� in consideratio� on processing of the application agrees din to. release, indemnify, defend and hold. the City.of Edmonds..harmless firom any and all damig6s, mc u greasonable attorney's fees, ari from ?ny action or infi-action..based. in whole or, part upon,falsc, misleading, inac sing curate or incomplete information firnished*by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signatme, I certi� that th irif tion and exInbits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized; to fil this ipplicationbn the behalf dfth� oWne as'listed beldO. SIGNATURE OF APP11C DATE -2 Property. Owner s AuthoHzation BY:my signature, I certif�. that Ihdveauthorizcd the above Applicant/Agent to -apply for the stibiectland usd' ap- . p . lication, and grant my permission forthe public officials and theitaff ofthe City �of Edirionds 16 enter the -subject property -for the purposes of inspection and posting t to.this applic , reo7l'�l SIGNATURE OP OWNER ATE PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/AppHcant: :Applicant Representative: i4 JAC- (-t Y�Z�J Name. Name ?o S-6 o TO ocx 5003' .Street Address Street Address �.—�A Y) 0 U\j 0.�, L�4 Y1 vi v, co 09 State city State zip city zip Telephone:4.2-0 Telephone:_(q-ZS) -7 c Z Z 37 Email address (optional): Email Address (optional): k? n r Lj #P20 CA File No:: Critical Areas Checklist .:Site Information (soils/topography/.hydrology/vegetaiion) I Site Address./Lo6ation: C, Taw-3 2- Property Tax.Account Number. 0 o 5() q LJ-00 00 3 eO-2-- roxima'te Site Size (acres or so fe . et). -7 A�rw:f 3.. App, quare 4. Is thissite currently developed? yes, no. r If yes; how is. site developed? gc-"g-c V e LL; ±V,� A rne It h h 5. Describe the general site topography. Oieck: all that apply. Tlit 1&�s'ffian-5-feet elevatiori change over e�ntike. :�,plcipes. o*n.'site�generally: less.. than 15% (a: vertical :rise Of - 10-fe6t -.over a. horizontal - distance�of 66-feet)- Hpy.-. s! opes, preseht on site 'of more than 15% and less fl= 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet ..,::'�".�ov'er.a.h6rizohW*di�t@6.c,66f33to66-fe,�t). P., . Steep.: grades of giea.ter flian 30% present on site (a 7ertical rise of 10-feet,over a horizontal distance of less than 334eet)'.' Other ibe):.. .(pl�� desai 6. Site contains areas of year-round stariding water. Approx. Depth. 7. Site contain� areas.of seasonal standing.water:* . What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodWAy _K (j floodplain L� f) of a water course. 9. Site contains.'a cnreek.,pr an area where water. flows across thegrounds, suiface? Flows are. year-round? -Flow s are sea so nal? LU n 1�- (What�� of 10. Site 'is primarily-. forested meadow shrt-ifn' 36�ed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubsetc) W 14-N, I k (i o e" f, 8�:-, II.. Obvious wetiand i's present on site: rJ I �]For SulffUseorly MjQ 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? P,M--�C_C�7�09;0 2. Site is Zoned? __Q C) 3. SCS mapped soil type(s)? Ax, 117— A 4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area ' onsite? A<-? 14- 5. Site within designated earth -subsidence landslide.haza. 4 area? Nk. �z,�c/ DETERMWATTON —STUDY REQUMED WAMM Re-tiewed br. Date:* CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 17808 Talbot Road' Tax Acct. Number: 00594400003802 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2007-0152 Applicant: Henry Byam Owner: Lloyd White CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may either contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard Areas, pursuant to Chapters .23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS '-, Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on ori adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain 8 mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the. ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are. discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). a Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC.23.80.020.8. In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. 0.1 The criteria that are applied d epend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. • The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15'.building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed, in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 2180.060. • In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than.ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include'. 0 Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD,AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. . . • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. I achuga, Planner Name Signatu November 20. 2007 Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 41 CRA-2007-152 This map displays LIDAR data at approximate 2-foot contour intervals. This map is for information purposes only and should not be relied upon for any action. Actual topography should be verified in the field by survey for accuracy. This map is provided with all faults on an "as is" and "as available" basis. No . warranty of any kind is given. Users of this map agree to indemnity and save harmless the City of Edmonds, its officials, officers, employees and/or agents from and against any claim, demand or action, irrespective of the nature of the cause of the claim, demand or action, arising out of any use or possession of this map. N W+E S I Inch equals 40 feet 0 10 20 40 Feet I I I I I I I -.Lj q Nx - 8723 8727 8620 ,17512 -- I L7--, 8"2 .530 8532 17522 20 8716 asZ2 17511 8536 8534 17530 17600 w 17624 "'1 wo" 17611 176 a a 17702 17720 177n7 17748 17709 17B02 South Snohomislh��-:, 1/ 9010 County Park 8910 0 1 7we ollo 17839 0941 179TH PL.SW 17905 179013 T IL- 17927 9 17922 M. 17-6 17.2. 1101 1101 9 9 9DO 1 1800 18003 18011 W's 8525 9 17 92IJ 17910\ 872 7 C VIEMI 03154 sots 18011 92 19 18002 180, -0 9231 ISGG4 18017 8602 18021 0 8706 33 1 BOGM6 18026 18029 CL 18102 18125 0& 8706 18102 18107 1810 9225 — 18105 181101 10 8432 1112 18 121 18117 18107 1810a #P20 CA File No: CA U" 62- Critical Areas Checklist :.Site hdormation (goils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) Site Address/Loca4ort. 2- Pr6Pe4T6x.AccountNtun6er 005_qqL4-0006_38rQ'2_. 3. Appromnat.e S* ite Size (acres or, square fe . et)� Is this. site currently developed? ��C yes, no. 7 C, I),-. Ve WL4 if loped? "6_5iAt Oft1hl"j, yes; how. site deve 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. change ovofentitiq�sitO. .,:Rqlling--: on, site "genetalty less.- flian, 15% - (a. vertical -nse::c&J0._f6et a. horizontal over distance. of 607feeo... HiUT-. sl4es 'present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30% (a vertical rise of- iO-feet over. a horizontal distance of, 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30%present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal &Aifice of leis -than 33466t). 'be): Qther (ple�Lw descn 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water _ao Appr''Ox. Depth. 7.' -Site contairL§ ar: -of seasonal sta4dingwater:-: - r4b Appro?�,D4_#L-. What season(s) of the year? 8. Site,is iii the f16odWeiy K floodplain t�,n of a water course. 9. S" contaimsq..creek.,or anarea where water flows*:across the grpunds,sur-faceT Tlow, s are. year. Flows are seasonal? LUnj�-- (What &m of year?,..: 10. Site is primarily-. forested meadbw �ihru]s P inixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) UJIJ,� 11. Obvious��e�and C is present on site c6ly g(aS7 For City Staff Use 1. Plan Check Number, if applicable?, P-,Lf)--,�MTkQ9k0 2- Site is Zoned? 3. SCS mapped soil M*s)? _24 A, 'Z�l _QP 4. Critical Areas inventory or CA. map indicates Critical Areik -on site? A 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslidehazard area? Nn DETERMINATTON REQUIRM WAIVER #.j?20 01F ED& City. of Edmonds Developmeiit Services Dqwt=t Plarming Division Phone: 425.771.02�O Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical ATeas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out -by any person. preparing a Development Pennit Applicationifor the City of Edmonds prior to -.his/her submittal of the application to the City.. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable Cit� staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas aze",''or. may be, prescnton the subject property. The. infiorin4tion, needed * to complete the Checklist should' be easily aNhailable � from,observatiims. of the site or data - a atim., City Hall (Critical arm inventories, maps, or. soil Date Received: I I / 0 9 12- CityReceipt#: CF-A-voo-q— olc5-1- Critical Areas File #: Critical Areas Checklist Fee:. $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her. authorized representative, u , in fih 61at th& clec�list�. sign and date . it, and ant st sub i it to the City. The City -will -review the cbecklist� inalce a'. precursory site visit and, make, a..determination of the - subsequent steps. necc'ssairy* to boniplete a &Volopinent . permitapplication... Please.submit a vicinityjnap, along with the si _gned copy of this form to assist City staff in findipg and locating the. specifi� -�Viece - ,of � prio-pid-rty � detchib6d - 'on `-this forin. -:-: Jn addition, th�l tippli shall _J -include odw pertinent information fe.g. site..plan, topography ;map, etc.) or studies*" cfi6n,%iih to assistant staff in conjun me . oniple -theiiprd assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant and his/her/its heirs, and 'in assigns, - consideration on ' the processing. of the., application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold.the City of Edmonds..harmless fiom 24'afid all'Airrikg6s' " including reasonable .attomey�s fees, arising from �ny action or infraction..based in whole or., part upon.falsc,'misleading, ina - Ocurate -or. incomplete information fivnished. by the applicant, histher/its agents or cniptoyees.,. tion 'bits herewith submitted 'are true and correct to the 8y my signature, I certi� that the, inf and e7Jn best, of my knowledge and that I am authorized to fij on the behalf of-ibe ownef as'listed below. this application 14,L?v rZi/ - .6�.,th SIGNATURE oF'APPucANT/, v... DATE AJ Property. Owner's AnthoEization By:my signature, 1. cerffl�. tha fhvive..auftrized the above Applicant(Agcnt to apply -for d . ic subj . ect land i I tse and grant my permission for thepublic officials and th6iiad.of the Cityvf Edmonds1o' enter the -subject property -for the purposes of inspection and this posting SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE, PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Appficant: 1_10i4�_ Name. Fo �3. c) -A S-(xi Street Address Y)VIO1,(Z Gin city State zip Telephone: Email address (optional): AppHcant Representative: . 1AC- t-4 kq f6ulcoo Name Street.Addrm Wov, w cc) (0 City, . State zip Telephone: 2 _C?Z6\1Z37 Email . Address (optionalj: -hen r ii h 11 Wv tt C Oev� Awl 4-, ('6 CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 17808 Talbot Road Tax Acct. Number: 00594400003802 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2007-0152 Applicant: Henry Byarn Owner: Lloyd White CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may either contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard Areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). 0 Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B. In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. I I 'i 0 0 0 The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: 0 Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. 0 Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. * Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. F:9 Name .00l- Signatur� Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 PLANNING DATA STREETF=I'LE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Name: Date: 1 I ' Site Address: Plan Check ff: 2 MR — I Q- RO 177 ROR Project Description: E�Cko%e, eX,-,4-w\ V1141n Reduced Site Plan Provide4(TE� NO) Zoning: Map Page: q0,5 Corner Lot: (YES Flag Lot: (YES Critical Areas Determination ff: (za k-,=57-01 Study Required — Lo-ndsl;de- 9 c\e*b-r n0C-W'Q-eJr Cof-r%e c waiver Per- -IT-e SEPA Determination: 4w-�nmo)r- 44-te, exlsrk 0(evel c-b3l %cA- XExempt ICVT-^Ck �t Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) El Fee 0 Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form Required Setbacks Street:(� E� Side:(,) Sideo, Rear: Actual Setbacks Street: Side: e- Side: Ck ?,x4-r--7e-c=-a-v Rear: OrJV Detached Structures: De Rockeries: El Fences/Trellises: —4%cuz�.-, El Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: 14 Stairs/Deck: ,:, \J Height Datum Point: Datum Elevation: /A Maximum Height Allowed: Q 15 Actual Height: No c.�pq- An e>6v!zX-,c,,2 Other. Parking Required: Parking Provided: Lot Area: Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% �IjProposed: Lot Coverage - CalculationsP Nc) C-V'-."�Cke ADU Created. (YES (W-9) Q Subdivision. -------- Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES comments 5� Plan Revie flanning Data form 04-11-06.doc PITY 01 ICAT QN OMSTRUCTIO fRMIT A7M I A 1, h-1-1 E.0 V_T N CITY, C�, NAME z 'ADOn Ei,, 13 z ENG.N�tWNG V�VO PAIED SEE nijp, 141,41E 'ADE�AESS 4-T-4 AVE 'Zory J W 'STIJE LICENSE: NUMSEN 'CITY LIC6 SCAT BE 14 tio A PC,, A 4 t:� �_ i�_ ALLOW10 Covk ?t E F of -I inciuce all -j"emonts Lo I yoscription of Property below,or attach lout copies) L YARM 1, 0 1 COyERAGE. r AfA W PL CIT A V, 29 .1 �4N No RESIDENTIAL Iry I-j-'11 AD Al. NON.AltiltoINTutE HIC"ANICAL f AVAINING WALL Fp,-c I? X?-L I CHECKEP UT L 0 1, "K, �-- , �r + . . - I `�, .. 1 DEMOLISH E, CA FILI, C4 19 V M SPECIAL IN�P 91, �1. V,9T 41COVIRED tA 8 DE SEWER WATIEFI N U z f2 NUMBEA OF STOHIE� UMSE40F 4 N�S , 1 6", UNIT$ �COTpa, . 4, NATUO OF WORK TO DE E JATTACH I _yA CAQoyLT V� VA;LUATjQN 'Eke rEF. A "V C'Pvetpo 1? 1.4' x of -Al e. L -d6rie on 04L.Y. D L 2:, 'This PenriTif 66v Is tb'64 GRA INGIFIL tion on the public dprri�aln (Curbs, sldexalkS. Any cLn§,Iruc driveways, m'Arquees, etc.) Will reqoIresep*ate pqrmissJon. I Permit Application: 180 Days it:'i Year - Provided Work Is StartedWithin 180,Days Permit Lim' _s'as on behalf of his or her spouse. tveir s ns and successors in Interest, a0rees Io.!ndem.nI:y, defend and hold harmless �the, City of Fdmortos, VVashingion. its Offiqlpls, BlIr Claims emplayees. and agents from �ny ind for damages 61 whatever nP.Wie, arising directly qtly from the issuance of thiS permit. Is§uanI;q of this pe!m1t shall no c or Indire I be 6 1 Pined to Modify. waive or reduce any.requirement q? any city ordinance Cio nor limit In any way t,he City's q0111ty to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this spplication: that the A TTENTIO I N APPLI CA . TIQN APPROVAL j Information blven Is correct; and that I'M the owner, IT the duty authorized agent of the owner. 1. agree to OrrOy with city pod 1HtS Qf,W%1tT Th DITsiructiort: ano In doing thewo kauthortz. _�s app1:ca!ioii Is not a permit until state laws I ;t1n 4..- .,.n y 0 at on q i ON sigrt by Builqlno Qf6clal or his ed ther*6 Tic on:� P111 #rnp� y I I I he Labor _LY T�E -and I . ees Arepaid,.and rccjeip- I I 0 pe Cde off t� Wa, glqn total %VOA�. NOTEO Derutv: ns 5 )I o Workmen's I:qrn 0"nowledgpd in spilI;e pirovIded, OFFICIAL .1 �SIGNATVAE CITY 0 F 3,1 EDMONDS IS LOCATED IN'THE C; THIS SIT% OF EPM t�DS, L CAL SALE S "A' 775t2 NT S -D 31-04. NLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE �HQLLD BE CODE IT IS U 51DQ or h6vAL'6A ORIGIN41. File YELLOW —.In Ct r kjNrIL. A FMAC 'INSPECTION 1,41, bEEN MADE AND �PO A CERTIF�CATF OF. OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN, GRANTED, UBIC� 3.. 1PI.1K — O%vner GOLD Assessor OCT: .8 1982 -7— -V nil -15u:b. j UA 4MMUMI-1 7W 1-71 4(.102 .3�tL I 3�Lv C11 -56-3 V4 od viv aN A-ur-gs, .-1 -1; -4 --3,V�j 44-� P V ta(lA. av L I +LL sv tj J-jq(:�j y�,&O j-v -VOr7a721 b,34 ... qWJ +j - (i Q,lvS J'o - I;v 18 3ALL (41 . ....... . . 0,N) _A Q VA -C -a� I ri TAW 1: H U, 0 .7r> -IvL .-Loa -5- No 3N oz i3o liel — , 4 - .1. t CITY OF EDM ONW�l U%E PERM NUMU 'CONSTR'UZTION PERMIT-- APPLICAT ION. jou F, I, OWNER NAMEiNAmE OF pusi 14ESS y- 72 R6 A Re 2/A R Is 44 L/ MAL DESCRIPTION CH E9K _,*,bu,0510N No' !�,D fig MAILING ADDRESS 11,4 �n?o IT A D D PUBLIC RIGHT.PF WAY PEA OFFIC141 S irEii MAP "ESCO APPnOVED !CITY BY EXISTING RIE9qJ9ED DEDICATION k) ;70 P90PO ED-' rJ L A� RIGHT OF WAY CON ST RUCYION P E AMIT REO U19ED !',I t6 ADDR SS STRiET USE PERMIT REOUIRED AY 11) REVIEW BY E SEE ENGINE RING MEMO DATED Z < TY C I TELEPHONE NUMBER "7 A?` �Z REMARKS 'M A., 0 AOASS V� Lo�kll_c4nl� " METER SIZE SUPPLY SIZE 46e IBU*;LDJNG jFIXTURE*U?jITS CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER REMARKS STATE LICENSE NUMBER 'SIGN AREA ENV. nkviqyv AGB NO. T_ E, at ascription 0 rope -incu ea easam n s y ALLOWED. PROPOSED COMPLETE EXEMPT -o (isho below or attach two coples) SHORELINE I VARIANCE R CU P �ANNING REVIEW BY DATE' LA—_ $Etb�CK� FEET �W LO�M FRONT 31 REAR �Y KC *6 2--nn6 T ElNEW F-TPLUMBING DENTIAL ADDIALTER MEACIAL ECHANICAL PLOG. El. REP�IR SIGN EXCAVATE FENCE DEMOLISH OR FILL 1_1=�FT) CHECKED BY E OF CONSTRUCTION ICODE 1,YFr HEIGH �0 CARPORT R�MODIEL GARAGE ;Q-1 SPECIAL INSPECTOR' AREA occ PkINCY U OC6U PANT RE zOUIREO GROY P 0 YES t" NO LqAo WOOD STOVE I M- RETAINING WALL/ INSERT L4 RENEWAL 7,� OCKERY PROGRESS MSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 NUMBER OF S70RIES BE R OF �UIMELLING NATURE OF -WORK TO.EIE DONE (ATTACW PLOT PLANI A VALUAT;ON FEE VN CHECK FEE WING tLUMBING A MECHANICAL .Tpis Permit Covers work to be done on pri�ataipiro arty ONLY. GRADINGIFILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, 31dewplk3, driveways. marquees, etc.),will require separate �ejrri'.IsSion. $TATE SURCHARGE Permit App!jCj lion: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work is Started Within 180 Days ENERby COD "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse.' heiril, asiiglis and, Successors in interest, agrees !o indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington. its officials. employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, ar�sing directly or lndire6tiy from the issuance . of this per mit. Issuance of this permit ihall not be aeemed to PLAN cHECK DEPOSIT modify. waive or riduce.any requirement of any city ordinance nor limit In any way the City's at)ility to, enforce any ordinarace. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Rrovision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this a pplicatlon:.thet the Information given Is correct; and that I am the owner,'Or the duty ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I.egreq to Comply wjth city and tHIS.PERMIT state laws regulating cQnStrucftn;�and In doing the Work author4z. AUTHORIZEii This application Is not a permit until eo thereby, 90 person will be er1hployed In violation -of the Labor ONLY THE Signed by !he Building Official or his Code of the State of Washington relating to Workman's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy: and fees are paid, and receipt Is tlQn Insurance. INSPECTION, acknowledgedin space'provided. $!9NA TURE IOWNE R OR AGEe� DATE S!9N D, D�?. RYME�J. . CITY OF I IA DAfE EDMONDS TION 771-3202 DATE J I . IS,UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCU ILDING OR STRUCTURE 8U UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS'SVEII MADE AND APPROVAL OR ORIqINAL File YELLOW — Inspector AW,CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAP�TERI 'GOL ieIis PINK Owner V!7' A 1� "A i'6 A. 2, It OtCORD OF INSPECTIONS Date asseu FOU DATION House. Porches, Piers w,111s, po GagRe, �pr A 'PLUMBING Under -round Rourlitin 7 Water servic*t: 14PATING SYSTEM - ------ r__ FRAMING WALLBOARD, FINAL 4-V 77' V t. In , r wq.,il IT, , r,�Y jr 4W t L.'A Zk X., 'PERM AT', MORK- A P PL CAT N, &,. Applica6c, x 'I n o. OF EDIVNDS no Department CiT, Y er.nilt ur4t� bne, car P Y APPLICATION Is hereb' Y MRde .2r a permIt to construct the following work, in accordance. with the accompsiong plaI and specifIcations: Mdn Swl-nm;ing Pool Building WORK Ground PoDf- x 0 Pl" SuPnjitted Const. Re 17808, Talbot Road -12 re" ; ........ .......... ise ....... ....... Fire LOCATION AM . ........ Use Zon S See attached Recorded Lot- .... Block . .................. Add'n Sewerage. . . ..... ..X .0. Width. ........... M4 Bldg. SetbI Front aM . .............................. Donald Pearsall ....... Addr... 7j Phone- 6- ...... . . ... . ........ ......................... Phone ......... K. A HcVde 6F 131dig. 15th Ave. .......... ... . .................................. :-IPTION L r3GAL X Phan Beginning :?t th c N.F. co;-r.er'of Tract 38, P !at of Talbot Park.,, as 'recorded fn Vol. 12 ok Plats, Page. 10.7,. records . .... . ... Of—SftohoI �7ount.y shington, U I iqnce WI , ti�, ..a- Ong e North lin ol a I c thence . South to e .1 Tract 38, 200 ft a point on tly-- 3rrith li n c of,said Tract A, 215.4 rom—.. ft. f e $4. corner; thence E. 21 .2 corner th .5 .4 f ti to the, S.E of said Tract 38; North a long the east lin thereof to the point of'hegi�riinq, P. no a is a correct stat t and I aI to/umply wit# &11 applies . hl� Codes and State Laws regulating the work. 'atera Signed: Own —i?,/- Au�z Same, lor the above work is1oreby approved, subj OnA. .-PlIance with the aliproved plans ect to the above conditi and to co 'A�d'vpeciflcatlons and Building Departinotit notations tl�preon.'* VA�LUAT.ION PERHM, MPS z Bldg. $ ... . ..... Aj%�ROVED: .. . . . ...... ........... ........... Elect. .... ..... .... ......... BUILDING DEPARTNOUTT Others S� ...... ............. ............. ..... .. .. ..... .... ... . . .......... TOTAL PME 3.4--Zli."�� NOTES: No work requi;ini'Build�pg Pepart-Rpt or City. EngipI inI &hall be cover ed befum irspeqtlon and approval. Twenty-fou (24) '40ui notice requested. C ntact the City Enghleer prior to construction 6vall sit h as r . 1 .0 1 - - .1 1 e'utfilties, Rue' 9ur4#, 'paving, oriveways, sewer,, water a treet connections. W t s ,.7 SAI Ran -C-047Y 0:; OMONDS' USE PERMIT' ZONi NUMBER ADD I IDION IbAr-:TAWM0N- PERMIT L. �AME tOXNAME OF'SUSINESS, . JOB �ss /-7800 :7,5 lz& r ? A 9-&7 L, D��SCRIPTICN CH -cc .49 1§mN'No. LID MAIyNQ ADDRESS - - ��L 7 9;09' 77MO7 TELEPH(?NE OAO. NUMB�R Y PUBLIC RIGHT OF WA PER OFFICIAL §TRIEgT MAP, EXISTING.6� AEO UIP!POEDICATION,— PROPOSE NAME ';DDRESS Iq) IT OF WAY CONSTRUCT:O N PERM IT R EOUIA EDL' I �57, STREET USE PERMIT REQUIRED ff z SEE ENGINFERiNq !A4MO DATE'D CITY '['!�iLEPHONE NUMBER -a'Ar776-737-3 REMARKS NAME WC470c PIWIAAa, 2%�4 AJff,4) _5770 ADDRESS METMSIZE BUkLqINGSQPPLY_SIZE ]FIXTURE U�tITS CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER REMARKS STATE LICENSE NUMBER SIGN ARki� LLONVED PROPOSED 'ENV.'REVIEW AG8 No:- Legal, Detcrl ption of Property -]hc!bde 611 easements COMPLETE EXEMPT z (Show below or attach four copies) SHORELINEII I VARIANCE 0 . KCU,r-- I PLAkNI No REVIEW BY' fA, �0111 I p FRON SIUE REA MA K 'El 'NEW' _F1 NC A -a R 9; Z- Uj �N_ 53 R f.,SID�NTIAL P�VMBINO Am COMMEP I;�SHANICAL El El AN '15 q� _Lpe� Q REPAIR RETAINING WALL SI QN EXCAVATE FENCE DEMOLISH OR FILL n I X 9HECKED�BY_ JTYPE�OF CONSTRuC1ION' 1. MN ODE HEIGHT 25- �Fl) RE-MOVE INSPJ SWIM nrMODEL' E] CZP�IANCF, INSP, PQQL . . PECIAC INSPECT09 [AREA REOUIREd I-OCCUPANQX_ GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD W OOD S TOVE.1 INSERT APT. BPG AENEWAL 0 YES 0 No ZA6&C17P1V5 R� 2 tiumbER OF ORIES' 7�HUNIBER Or P I— L UNITS NATURE OF+ WqR;. TO BE DPNIE'(AT TACH PLOT PLAN) e5x. ear. fz-,94 -IA�rz '17P41 4, gela) T U AT19 N_ F -E FE E APAO AICAI 10'F6e- _OV., :54h:g PLAN CHECK FEE + + BUILDIN'� 2 239.co PLUMBING This Permit CoverSworh to be done on privets pmpe�� ONLY. GRADING)FILL Any co;StrUqtlOn on the public domain (curbs, sidewalks, ,driveways, mari:Iueqs, etc.) will require.-.O,pSrate permission. STATE SURCHARGE Z Permit Applicition:1 86 bays Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days ENERGY CODE "Appllcant.'On behalfolf his oi'her spouse, heir's,'assign.s and, a uccessois In Interest, agrees to Indemnify, defend hnd hold harmlesi the City of Edm6nds; Washington, Its officials', 2 employees, and agents from any and all claims fordamagbs of whalevq, nature, arisIng directly or Indirectly from the.lss6ance of this permit. Issuance'of this perinit She 1. not be deemed 10 PL,�N CMgPK DEPOSIT modify, waive or reduce any requirerne6i of any city ordinance nor limit In any way thii City's ability to Snf0fdO Brice pr6vlslon�- pny.ordin... TOTA�- AMOUNT DUE I hereby acknowledge that I have.read this app!lcation; that the Infotmatlon gjyen Is correct: and that I am III I . a Owner, Or.the duly - . �TT.qNTIOW A PPLICATION. APPROVAL authorized agent of the owner. I i6ree tb comply with cit y and sta.!e!aws regul@tlng construction and In doln , g the Work quthorli. THIS PERM:T AY7�ORIZES This application Is not a perm!t,.untli . . ed thereby, no perpOn will be employed In violation of the Libor ONLY THE' 1161 signed by !!iB. Building Of at or hit o d C p of the State of Washington relating to Workmen'sZompeksa- WORK NqT�q 0dpu!y;,and.feei are paid, and*recilpt is . tio -H Insurance INSFECTION acknow edged In space pro�lded. §19NATURE-JO WNER OR Aq PD, E !0 DEPARTMENT CITY OF 91FIC,IAL'S SIGNATURE DATE 'T gQlAQNDS ATTENT!'ON REI FASED 8 01 hAt /oh IT It UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING* OR,STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECfION'HA+S BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL -OR File YELLOW — Inspector '1)+B' A CERTIFICXYE Ol� OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. CHAPTER 3: PINK — Owner GOLP �.Assessor iL r,-v . A 07 . . . . . . . .... 30i -:J_ 00� CD C I T Y o f, E D M D S199CM-M-90— SVE SEWER-- P E R M I T For Inspection Call 771-320:�EG 4 Z 1986 PERMIT N 0 0 pUBLIC WORKS PVY_tNNW;001�) _LINE Address of Construction: Property Legal Description (Incl'ude all easements); Owner-and/or,Builder: __T;_)14_) 6A.)S1?__ Contractor & License No: Singl:e Fami ly Residence Mul ti - Fami ly (No. of Units LI Commercli al (No.. of fixturle Units r Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes, Right -of -Way Construction Permit required... Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Property: No Yes (If Yes, easement required, attach legal descriptionand co.unty-6asement number.) PLEASE RE T ITEMS LISTED ON THE BACK I certify that I hav(N rkad and hall comply Date with.the items listed on the b\ak.' Permit Fee: Issued By: Trunk Charge: Date Issued-: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: Partial Inspection: Comments Date Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial Rejected: Keason PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ONJOB SITE Wh-ite Copy File Green Copy - Inspector —D--a-t-e 7—nitial Buff Copy Applicant Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENTNO - -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION F� REPAIRS Z LID NO. 1(24 ------- ASMT. NO - ------------------ OWNER -------------------------------------------------------------- -- .............................. CONTRACTOR 7FWl-t-4 --- --5-:FMttA-Czr ... C-ON-S7r! ------------------- PERMIT No. JOB ADDRESS ... 1-7-SOB ------ TA-i--:2,o7E ...... R.V�: ------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO. )._Lf - NE .... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ................................. .................. NAMEOF ADDITION ------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- C.O. CAP 4"ASS ^P 0 0 2,0p. C-0 C- A P G, bp. lr7S08 TAL-i2�o-r T�D. DOG PLN '1% D .......... PWW-0001-11/75(REV.11/78) DATE ..................... By - - -------------------- /X W //;: �- 1-3/. APPLICATION for ,tl The City of Edmond�� SIDE SEWER PERMIT REPAIRS [I NEW CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT NO. LID NO ----------------- NO-.- ====, r-.- / 11 ----- ----- ------ MIT-- NO ---- --------- ........... .................... ----------- --- --------------------- -1-A ------- — CON CTOR - -------- rRA ------------------------------------- OWI-4ER -------------------------------------------- -BL-OC--K---NO.--- -EGAL.- DESCRIPTION-: LOT NO -------------------- -- -------- ---- ---------------- -------- JOBADDRESS ---------------------------------------------- ------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- I ---------------------------------------- NAMEOF ADDITION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approved: ...... By --Z�-�4 ------- --- nATE ........ a a 0 APPUCATION The City of Mmonds for SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEUENT No. ---------------------------------------- 0 NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS LID NO. -160� ----- ASM`T. NO. -------- OWNER --------- ------------------ CONTRACTOR -c ................ -------------------------- ---------- PERMI NO. JOB ADDRESS ...... .................... ----- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT N0.?0-jA(4,-Yw-- ......... -T a .... BLOCK No. Lt""o- -164 0 k cv 's. ---- ev.--ft-, ----- . c',-- -td NAME OF ADDITION T, k---- --- 2 0 0 1 ,�, c a-( e I" =- -/ 0 1 + Approved: R F --� —t i . JUN I �* 1914 DATE-------------------------------------------- By PAPPV AS NOTED Y fNEERING Date-. GARDEN 9 2 1 15.24' CARDEN 17808 TALBOT RD. EDMONDS, WA 98020 30, OWNER 1313tA 2--6' LLOYD J. WH17E - a3 0 SZ-0 B 6�7 0 PO BOX 5003 pZ�ZtAl" kk LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 74a-%G S� 1%6 S� S� C� 26'-3' NC5 �4 (::) TAX PARCEL 005944000OJ802 0 \\4 ZONED— RS20 A) RESIDENTLAL SINGLE FAMILY 0 0 2ND FLOOR OPEN PLANK 25' WN FRONT SETSA LA CK (00 bo 1� 4� DECK REBUILT UNDER -51ar- REAR SETBACK. 25' PERMIT If 8,90711 SIDE SETBACK: 10125135- (:T AQ 5V - 4 �AOOS�7 REPLACING ORIGINAL DECK MAX LOT COVERAGE.- 35X N, JNPA I jc)5a TOTAL ADD 215 SF EXISTING COVERAGE 4.057 SF- 16X N Buj\_ S-7 S�7 1-7�1 TOTAL LOT SF: 24, 829 13� )Z4 �_S �, /�7\,j LOT COVERAGE CHANGE: NONE EXISTING PATIO BELOW 0 c), INSTALLED 1962 3A 2) S� %33S\Jvs I'S 2 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5�3 -4' TALBOT PARK BLK 000 0-02-BEG NE CDR LOT 38 TH W ALG N LN 200FT TH GARDEN rig S TO AFT ON S LN 215.24FT FR SE CDR VqALE�14:A::5�0: �1 SEWER TH E215.24 TO SE CDR TH E 215.24FT GARDEN i _ 0 cc REMOVED LA WN CLEAN OUT TO SE CDR TH N ALG E LN TO POS '----,PLAAIT GRASS 200' DESCRIPTION OF WORK ENCLOSE EXISTING ROOF BREEZEWAY 20, 20 EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE ROAD 0 BETWEEN MAIN LMNG SPACE AND MASTER BEDROOM NO CHANGES TO ROOF RECORD # 1024818 FILE # 9802120298 LINES ARE INCLUDED CITY CO"PV Zone aO Corner_kona&AL 'Nothing in this permit approval process shall be IL JL interpreted a allowing or permitting the lAbAcks Re ' ed Actual maintenance of any currently existin NOTE: g illegal, nonconforming or unperm:tted building, structure NUMBER IN CIRCLES TO CORRESPOND front sil-FIE IP or site condition which is outside the scope of the To RESpONS,, LETTER FOR PERMIT BLD 20071080 Sides rrmit application, regardless of whether such RESUIB u Rear uilding, structure or condition is shown on the SCALE-: 1 "--20'-0" site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or Other condition may be the subject of a separate MAR 04 2008 enforcement action." 7 THIS DRAWING REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF ZFWI-WM AW_ W. WESCO CROUP`�,: Mr LAIX TERANa AND SHALL NOT BE� REPRODUCED BY ANY WASWOM VJW METHOD WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF �WESCO WESCO CRUOP APPROVED BY PLANNING Mj 425-M-Mm WESCO GRUOP FA* 429-770-19ff ACCEPTED SHOP DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT SC�LE: OAAWN BY, , , - 3/ 0 SM PLAN SELECTION. FOR TARA VAN MONH SIGNED: DATE: DATE, 1 17808 rffjff RD ff0USj A-- BY 10/23/07 f7M rAWr AIX X-V -b- oy_ Owc.� #. AVMVAM a MW REWSED: 1007-01P 03-04-08- d" IF: . APPROVEDAS NOTED B EERING Date/ '3 1 't CARDEN SlIt ADDRESS 215.24' 17808 TAIBOT RD. CARDEN EDMONDS. W4, 98020 2\ 0. OWNER 4 2--6" LLOYD J. WH17E 0 1 PO Box 5003 9 1Ar'SJS:R SE'(p17 LYNNWOOD, WA 98045 Es 154A.B )C)Z /C\3 26'-3' IS 2--6' �A' 0 r1J TAX PARCEL oo5.94400003602 ZONED— RS20 Ik- 0 0 %*- RESIDENTkq SINGLE FAMILY LA WN 00 3A'- 2ND FLOOR OPEN PLANK FRONT SEFEWCK: 25' �0 bo N DECK REBUILT UNDER REAR SE734CK: 25. 4' PERA41T J 890711 SIDE SE734CK. 10�125IJ5' �00s�- REPLACING ORIGINAL DECK mAx LOT covrRAGE. J5X 195?. TOTAL ADD 215 SF EXIS77NG COVER4GE. 4,057 SF- 16X pJqA S� 13� S� TOTAL LOT SF: 24. 829 :V EXISTING PATIO BELOW LOT COVERAGE CHANGE., NONE 'Bux�- 19 ��16-63 INSTALLED 1962 pCRkAJJ '� 34- S� I'Slal 133S\1�7s 2-6 0� V /1-7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4' TALBOT PARK BLK 000 D-02-BEG ME GARDEN CDR LOT 36 rH W ALG N LN 20OFT TH S TO APT ON S LN 215.24FT FR SE CDR NNALK� 4-A50 SEWER TH. E2Y5.24 TO SE COR TH E 215.24FT GARDEN LA WN TO SE CDR TH N ALG E LN TO POB CLEAN OUT TO BE REMOVED PLANT GRASS 200' DESCRIPTION OF WORK ENCLOSE EXISTING ROOF BREEZEWAY 20' 20 EASEMENT FOR FRIYATE ROAD C) BETWEEN AWN LMNG SPACE AND I MASTER BEDROOM NO CHANGES TO ROOF RECORD # 1024818 FILE # 98.02120298 LINES ARE INCLUDED 'N . othing in this permit approval process shall be CITY COPY zotw--&a--aoCornerAFlag_AL interpreted as allowin . gor Oermitting the Jgbacks Re * ed am Actual maintenance of any currently existin . 1 illegaL NOTE. 'tted b ildin& structure front S 11 "111 1E IP ][1-411*q nonconforming or unpermi u NUMBER IN CIRCLES 70 CORRESPOND or site condition which is outs;de the scope of the TO RESPONSE LETTER FOR PERMIT BLD 20071080 Sides t application, regardless of whether such RES"UB Rear ruiluduing structure or condition is shown on the Other SCALE: 1---20'-0- site plan or drawm*g. Such building, structure or condition may be the subject of a separate MAR 04 2008 enforcement action." wy's �c 0007- XO THIS DRAWING REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF &001-4M AVL W. WESCO CROUP MT. LAPX IMBUff AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED BY ANY WASAWXMW 8800 METHOD WITHOUT THE WRI77EN CONSENT OF WESCO IM 425-M-CM PrESCO CRUOP APPROVED BY PLANNING WESCO GRUOP FAX* 425-77V-1917 ACCEPTED'SHOP DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT SCALE: DRAWN BY: SELEC770N. Erm RM FOR IARAVAN MONH SIGNED: DATE: DATE., fHJ01' PJffoUff APPROVED BY: 110/23/07 tam V" XL X--y b. SO — DWG. #. awam = to= REWSED 1007-01P 03-04-08-00 deck k 0' CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 STATUS: ISSUED 3/17/2008 'Pernuit'#:'BLD29074,08 BUILDING PEkMIT RD, EDMOND Expiration Date: 3/17/2009 L ,�Ject Address:, 17809., AILB OA Parcel No: 00594400003802 PROPERT)'OWNER APPLICA11T CWTI'MWTOA LLOYD WHITE WESCO CONSTRUCTION WESCO CONSTRUCTION 17808 TALBOT ROAD PO BOX 5003 21601 66THAVEW EDMONDS, WA 98026 LYNNWOOD, WA 98046 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043 425-771-0926 x 425-771-0926 LICENSE 4: WESCOCDO77CZ EXP:I 1/20/2009 JOB DESCRIPTION ENCLOSE BREEZEWAY TO CREATENEW ENTRYWAY, 5 EET. )lll VALUATION: $25,000 C0 *�f PERMIT TYPE: Residential PIRMIT GROUP: 4 - Alteration/Remodel Interior k GRADING: N CYDS: 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB sua I LA it IF -1 *A RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: N OCCUPANT GROUP: R3 OCCUPANT LOAD: FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: 2006 OTHER: N ------- OTHER DESC: IZONE: RS-20 INUMBER OF STORIES: 2 1 VESTED DA E: INUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: I I F.XISTING AREk BASEMENT � 0 1 S7 FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 PROPOSEDARIE�k =BASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 508 2ND FLOOR: 0 13KD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 13RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 . FRONTSE"I'BACK SIDESEMACK RE-kRSETBACK REQUIRED: See Below PROPOSED: 17EQUIRED: PROPOSED: IREQUIRED: PROPOSED: HEIGHT ALLOWED:0 PROPOSED:O IREQUIRED: PROPOSED: SETBACK NOTES: Enclosing existing covered breeze"ey; therefore, no change proposed to existing setbacks, height, lot coverage, etc. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOINGTHE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINCY70N RELATINGTO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. THIAA PLICATION-M-50—T—PPERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS(HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID. -4, -t/' N; dytq &AM I, I 1 -0'? /1"79 1-1-7-66 Date Released Date I ATTENTION ITIS 6N11AWFUL7ro USE OROCCUPY A BUILDING ORSTRUCTURE UN-nL A FINAL INSPECrION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL ORA CER-nF1CA-rE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANFE D. UBC1 09/ 1BC1 10/ iRC1 10. ARCHIVE APPLICANT A��ESSQR OTHER i w--A7 STATUS: ISSUED BLD20071080 CONDITIONS • Seperate Permit Required For: INTERIOR REMODELING CONTACT A BUILDING PERMIT COORDINATOR. • Obtain Electrical Permit from State Department of Labor & Industries. 425-290-1309 • Sound[Noise originating from temporary construction s ites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00arn and 6:00prn on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activites must comply with the noise Knits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT TIME LIMIT. SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) I BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 1 ENGINEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 1 FM (425) 771-0215 1 PUBLIC WORKS (425) 771-0235 PR&TREATMENT (425) 72-5755 RECYCUNG (425) 275-4801 When calling for an inspection please leave the folloNNing information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being reauested. Contact Name and Phone Number. Date Prefereed and -Abether vou nrefer mornine or afternoon. • E-Engineering Final • B-Setbacks • B-Footings • B-Foundation Drainage B-Slab Insulation B-I'mming 13-Wall Insulation/Caulk B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk B-Sheetrock Nail B-Building Final P" rr- 3D e -02 Side S w 0 r,,alw",i Rg, - The City of Edmonds T6 Cwt a Ww" so t��NSEMENT NO -- -------------------- ------------------------- Pl�'EAW#G,@,)N,,SjTa,UCU ON JrK] klRTE'. P. rAll Rf "si M 'jo No.. , ii- &SM -T.,,N,,O - - - - ------------- rilwr Wl- OWNE�M---- ------------- C ---- ------ iA ---------- PERMIT NO.7!Z?-ZQ JOB AnDRE ................. BLOCK L 00NONWIPTI100N 0 - -------- .............. ---- Fq .................................................................................................................................................................. �Hffl;W- A=IT" . ..... OF ADDITION N------- ---------- 10 �l Vop. AV Ca. cpp Ta 4 4 DROP s,%)p 2 5' t 95 0 i 2,0p. C.C. CAP G" bp. TAL12so[ T� D. 2.5,0 P. 4?1 PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) D A T E ...... ........ ............. y 6Lec . . ... ................................. 2241211 1 PG 0 10 0 :� "N 2 8�m 0 212 , J62 0 SNOHOMISH COUNT ASHINGTON Return Recorded Instrument To: City of Edmonds Development Services Department - Planning Division 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT STATEMENT Property Address: 17808 Talbot Road, Edmonds Washington Assessor's Parcel Number: 00594400003802 TALBOT PARK BLK 000 D-02 - BEG NE COR LOT 38 TH W Legal Description: ALG N LN 20OFT TH S TO APT ON S LN 215.24FT FR SE COR TH E215.24 TO SE COR TH E 215.24FT TO SE COR TH N ALG E TO POB Grantor(s): Lloyd White Grantee: City of Edmonds Related Permit Numbers: BLD20090043 I'iiave read the requirements for accessory dwelling units contained in Chapter 20.21 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and understand that an accessory dwelling unit as defined in ECDC Section 21.05.015 is prohibited until an Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit is approved. I also understand that an Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit cannot be approved unless all the criteria in Chapter 20.21 are met, and all the necessary items are submitted, including an affidavit of occupancy and a covenant to be filed with the Snohomish County regarding the regulations imposed on Accessory Dwelling Units. OWNER/GRANTOR(S): SIGNATURE: DATED this Z,2 day of 60& -2#"*2-0(L) On this day personally appeared before me Lloyd White, to me known to be the individual described therein and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his f �ge\vqjqntary act and deed, for the use and purposes therein mentioned. Notary's pressure seal mqo!�"5\pfiud�p Dated: FO SiTature of Notary Public: t"I CD5 A Residing At: &13 L\C' 0 -?4 - i -�Mly Appointment Expires: 0�1: G VVASW - THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR - RECEIVED nTFtEET FILE FEB 2 6 2010 , 01 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR, CITY OF EDMONDS h Science*nc. Alsociated Eart February 24, 2009 Revised March 18, 200Ar Project No. KE080775A WESCO 21601 66hAvenue West Mount Lake Terrace, Washington 98043 QY of Edmonds fill ilding Departm. ent PIAN Attention: Mr. Henry Byam Subject: L . imited Subsurface Exploration and FILE� GeotechnicalEngineering; Report White Residence Remodel 17808 Talbot Road E:C E I VE: D- Edmonds, Washington APR 2 1 2010 D EVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. Dear Mr. Byam: CITY OF FOMONDS This report presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration - and geotechnical engineering study for the proposed remodel at the White *residence located at 17808 Talbot Road in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). The 'site and the approximate locations of the subsurface explorations referenced in this study are presented on the.. "Site and Exploration Plan" (Figure 2). in the event that any changes in the nature, design, or layout of the project are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should be rev , iewed and modified, or verified, as necessary. We have enjoyed working with you on this study ' and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. Please contact me if you have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The proposed remodel will consist of a new garage area on the south * east corner of the house and an additional floor on the remaining existing residence. The new foundation loads for the Kirkland Everett Tacoma 425-827-7701 425-25 9-0522 253-722-2992 www.aesgeo.c om proposed addition of a second floor to the existing residence adjacent to the steep slope will be carried by new columns. The columns will be placed just outside the existing foundation wall .and a new beam will be placed at the top of the columns, thus transferring the new loads off the existing foundation wall. Therefore, no new load will be carried by the existing foundation. I 'It is our understanding from the review of the submittal response, from the City of Edmonds that a critical areas report containing foundation soil bearing capacity recommendations and a response to the landslide hazard ordinance is required due to the location of the steep slope on the northwest corner of the property. The purpose of this study was to provide shallow subsurface soil and shallow, ground water data to be utilized in the design and development of the existing house at the above -referenced property. Our study included: • A review of selected available geologic literature; • Advancing four shallow hand auger exploration borings; and Performing limited geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water conditions. At the conclusion of our field exploration, a geotechnical engineering study was completed to formulate our recommendations regarding site preparation, structural fill, and support of the proposed renovated structure. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers development recommendations based on our understanding of the project. SITE AND SUBSURFACE OBSERVATIONS The project is located at 17808 Talbot Road in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). The project area is bounded on the north by 178' Place SW, on the east by Talbot Road, and to the south and west by existing residential development. The existing house consists of a one-story, wood -framed residential structure with an attached, covered pool on the east side of the residence and a daylight basement level in the northwest corner of the house. A detached, two -par garage is located directly to the south of the residence. The topography is highest in the southeast corner of the property and lowest in the northwest corner of the property. Overall vertical relief across the property is approximately 30 feet. Existing slope gradients range from approximately 10 percent -in the front (east) end of the property to approximately 14 percent in the rear (west) end of the' property. Site slopes are steepest along the west half of the north side of Vh�e property where an existing segmental block wall is located along the north property line. The wall ranges to approximately 5 feet tall with slopes as steep as 60 percent above the wall in the northwest corner of the property 2 based on the existing site topographic map. The slope height above the wall ranges from approximately 6 feet tall in the northwest corner of the property to less than approximately 3 feet near the northeast comer of the existing house. We observed the exterior of. the existing dwelling, focusing on the concrete foundation sternwalls at the base of the exterior where the additional floor is planned. We observed some cracks in the sternwalls along the northern side of the existing structure along the edge of the pool area. We did not observe any cracks in the concrete slab walkways or the curb and street pavement for 178thPlace SW. gubsurface Exploration Program Out field studies consisted of advancing four shallow hand auger exploration borings to gain subsurface information about the project area. Our- explorations were approximately located in the field by estimation and measuring from known site features shown on the "Site Plan" provided to Associated. Earth Sciences, Ind. (AESI) by the client. Approximate exploration locations are shown on the attached "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the shallow hand auger exploration borings completed for this study. The locations and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budget constraints. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any. variations between the field explorations may not'become fully evident until construction. If variations are observed at that time, it may be necessary to re-evaluate specific recommendations in this report and make appropriate changes. Four hand auger exploration borings (HA-1 through HA-4) were completed across the project area- * The hand auger exploration borings were performed by an engineering geologist from our firm. During the exploration process, grab samples were obtained at various intervals the entire length of the boring. The engineering geologist described the various types of sediments, as well as the depths where characteristics of the sediments changed, and recorded the information on the exploration logs presented in the Appendix. The samples obtained were pl . aced in watertight containers and transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and laboratory testing, as necessary. We were not able to advance hand auger borings HA-3 and HA-4 locate-:d along the north side of tht� existing residence beyond 2 to 2.5 feet below the existing ground surface due to the,. presence of loose, coarse gravel and cobbles. 3 Subsurface C6nditions Subsurface conditions on the project site were inferred from the field explorations conducted for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and a review of applicable geologic literature. As shown on the field logs, the observed subsurface conditions generally consisted of silty, gravelly fill soils overlying granular sediments interpreted as Vashon recessional outwa ' sh and -advance out -wash. We were not able to determine with suitable confidence the depth of the fill soils along the north side of the existing residence due to the coarse nature of the soils, as noted above. The conditions encountered in our explorations are generally consistent with the geology mapped in the project area on the ' Draft Composite Geologic Map -of the Sno-King Area, Central Puget Lowland, Washington, Derek B. Booth, Brett F. Cox, Kathy G. Troost, and Scott A. Shimel, 2004. The following section presents more detailed subsurface information beginning from the youngest (shallowest) to oldest (deepest). sediment types. Fill Fill was encountered in all our hand auger explorations. The fill ranged generally less than approximately 12 inches thick in the area of the future garage expansion in the south half of the property. As.noted above, the hand auger borings along the north side of the house did not penetrate the fill soils due' to coarse rock encountered approximately 2 to 2.5 feet below the existing ground surface. However, in boring HA-4, we were able to probe through the coarse rock to approximately 5 feet below the existing ground surface using a 1/2-inch-diameter steel probe under moderate body down pressure from the AESI ' engineering geologist. We interpret that the fill is at least 5 feet thick in this area of the property along the north edge of the house. The fill soils observed from our field explorations generally consist of loose sand with variable gravel content, variable silt content, and cobbles in places. The existing fill is not suitable to support additional building foundation loads. Excavated fill can be reused as common structural fill if it is free of organic material and debris and can be compacted to project specifications, or could be used in landscape areas. The existing fill should not be used as select structural fill or as drainage fill for the new field. . i Vashon Recessional Outwash Vashon recessional outwash was encountered in only one of our borings (HA-1) located in the area of the garage expansion in the southeast corner of the property. The recessional outwash was observed underlying the fill at this location., The bottom of the recessional outwash was encountered at a depth of approximately 5 feet below the existing ground surface. Recessional outwash was deposited by rivers and streams flowing from the melting Vashon glacier. The recessional outwash observed at the site consists of loose, to medium dense, fine to medium grained sand with a trace to few gravel and ?_ trace to few silt. The recessional outwash is typically suitable to support light foundation loads. Though not observed in our borings, recessional outwash can contain high quantities of silt and,. therefore, is said to be moisture- 4 sensitive. Care should be taken 'to protect the subgrade from degradation by heavy construction equipment. Excavated fill can be reused as common structural fill if it is. free of organic material and debris and can be compacted to project specifications. . . Vashon Advance Outwash Advance outwash was encountered in boring HA-1 and HA-2 in the s . outh half of the site in the area of the proposed garage remodel. Advance outwash was deposited into meltwater streams and lakes in front of an advancing continental glacier and was compacted by the weight of the glacial ice. The advance outwash soils observed in our borings consisted of medium dense to dense', fine to coarse grained sand with a trace to little silt and a trace *to few gravel. We observed occasional thin interbeds of hard, massive to laminated, iron oxide stained silt ranging to clayey silt. Advance outwash sediments typically possess high strength and low compressibility attributes that, are favorable for structural support. The advance outwash can contain substantial silt and are considered highly moisture -sensitive when excavated and used as fill, but can be used as common structural fill if the moisture content can be adjusted to allow compaction to A firm and unyielding condition at an appropriate density for the intended purp . ose. Care should be taken to protect the subgrade from degradation by heavy construction equipment. Hydrology Ground water seepage was not encountered in our . explorations at the time of our field investigation. -However, seasonal saturation of shallow ' soils at this site is expected to occur when perched ground water develops above siltier subsurface materials. Perched ground water occurs when rain or surface water infiltrates through upper, looser, and more permeable soils, such as the fills and weathered surficial soils on the site, and is trapped on top of or in the upper portions of the underlying, less . permeable materials. It should be noted that fluctuations in the level of the ground water may occur due to the time of the year, changes in on- and off - site land use, and variations in the amount of rainfall. GEOLOGIC HAZARD CONSIDERATIONS In out opinion,'the site should be considered to have a low risk of liquefaction during a design seismic event. Liquefaction is a condition where loose, saturated, typically sandy soils lose shear strength when subjected to high intensity, cyclic loads, such as occur during earthquakes. The resulting reduction in strength can cause differential foundation settlements. We observed no definitive evidence that the steep slope and segmental block wall alon the 9 northern side of the property has been affected by slope movements in the recent past. However, the fill soils observed along the north side of the existing structure at the top of the R slope and wall, where project plans include a one-story addition, are not suitable to support the anticipated increased foundation loads. We were not able to penetrate the existing fill soils along the north side of the existing structure to determine the depth to suitable bearing soils. Therefore; we recommend that foundation loads in this area be supported on a deep foundation. Small -diameter pipe piles are recommended in the. following sections of this report. If the foundation recommendations provided in this report areadequately implemented into the design of the structure, it is AESI's opinion that the risk of damage to the structure due to slope failure will be minimal. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The 'proposed project will consist of a one* -story addition to the existing residential structure with a ' one-story expansion of the existing detached garage.. Based upon the geologic mapping and observed subsurface conditions, it is our opinion that the proposed improvements are feasible utili * zing a combination of conventional spread footings for the new garage and new foundation elements that support the second floor. A pin pile foundation system Ponsisting of driven, small -diameter, steel pipes could also be used around approximately the northern half of the existing house where the one-story addition is planned if suitable soils are not found within a reasonable depth upon excavation for the new foundation elements proposed outside the existing perimeter foundation. The following paragraphs discuss our geotechnical recommendations for the proposed project. Site Preparation Site preparation should begin with installation of temporary erosion and sedimentation controls, if necessary. Any surface water should be intercepted and routed to.a suitable discharge location. Although we are not aware Of any structures or buried utilities in -the planned garage construction area, if any exist, they should be removed. If demolition creates areas of excavation or disturbed soils below foundation grades, these areas should be backfilled with structural fill, as discussed under the "Structural Fill7' section. Site preparation of planned building ar . eas should include removal of all trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious material. Additionally, the upper organic topsoil should be removed and the remaining roots grubbed. Areas where loose surficial soils exist due to grubbing operations should be considered as fill to the depth of disturbance and treated as subsequently recommended for structural fill placement. In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsib ' ility-of the contractor and should be determined during constructiQn. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the existing fill can be planned at a maximurn slope of 1.5H:lV (Horizontal: Vertical). As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing �1- and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. If surface water or ground water seepage is encountered in temporary excavations, temporary excavation slope angles will need to be flatter than the maximum values estimated above. The on -site soils may contain a high percentage of fine-grained material, which makes them moisture -sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. - The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. Structural FRI We anticipate that structural fill placement will be limited* to backfill of overexcavation, leveling of the lot, and in utility trenches. All references to structural fill in this letter refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials as discussed in this section. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground should be recompacted to a firrn and unyielding condition. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction miay be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of r6compaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed -ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free-*. draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using American Societyfor Testing and Materials (ASTM):D 1557 as the standard. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisfure-sensitive. Use of imi th moisture -sensitive soil'in structural fills should be I ted to favorable dry wea er..conditions. The on -site soils generally contained significant amounts of silt and are considered moisture - sensitive. Imported fill, if needed, should consist of predominantly granular, non -organic soil, 7 free of demolition waste or other unsuitable material, with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A 'representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in - place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the owner in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. Foundations Spread footings may be used for foundation support when founded directly on the dense sand and gravel sediments. All new and all replacement footings should be embedded at least 2 feet into the undisturbed soils. We recommend that an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be utilized for foundation design purposes, including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. All footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above loose soils or organic -rich soils. The area bounded by lines extending downward at 1H: 1V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. * In addition, a 1.511:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts ifi the bearing soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded on the properly prepared native soils should be less than :Y4 inch. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be observed by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this letter. Pin Pile Foundations If the excavations for the new foundations are not within reasonable depth then pin piles consisting of 2- to 4-inch-diameter, driven steel pipe sections may provide suitable support for - the improvements. The pipes shovid be driven to refusal with equipment appropriate to the pipe diameter. Multiple pipe sections should be joined with a compression fitting inside ' the pipe or welding of the pipe sections. All pipe sections and connections should be galvanized to N provide corrosion protection in the acidic, organic soils anticipated to underlie the site. Table I summarizes typical wall thicknesses, driving equipment, refusal criteria, and allowable axial compressive loads for each pipe diameter. If higher allowable loads are desired, on -site load testing of at least two piles should be performed to at least twice the design load to verify that the pile capacities are achievable in the site soils. The load test procedures should be observed by an AESI representative and the test results reviewed,by an AESI geotechnical engineer. Table 1 -Pin Pile Summary Pile Inside Diameter Wall Thickness Typical Installation _KqD�pment Refusal Criteria (seconds/inch)* Allowable Axial Compressive Load" (kips) 2-ihch Schedule'80 90-lb j ackharnmer + man >60 4 3-inch Schedule 40 650-lb percussion driver 15 10 4-inch Schedule 40 850-lb percussion driver 16 -16 Based on listed installation equipment. Other equipment may alter refusal criteria. Allowable loads may be increased with acceptable load testing to twice the design load. If uplift loads are expected to be placed on the piles at any time,. the connections should also be securely welded * It should be noted that the uplift capacity of pin piles is typically -not significant, and is not used for design. Piles may be battered up to 15 degrees to develop lateral capacity. Battered piles inclined up to 15 degrees should be designed with an allowable axial co mpressive capacity equal to that usedfor vertical piles. Although vertical pin piles can provide small uplift and lateral capacities, we recommend that these contributions be neglected in designing the new foundation system. Lateral resistance at the foundation level. may be provided by passive resistance, as described in the following section. The structural engineer should provide pile spacing, locations, splicing details, foundation connection details, and any other structural design recommendations that are needed. No minimum pile spacing requirements are necessary for pin piles from a geotechnical standpoint. Since pin piles are driven until specific refusal criteria are achieved, rather than to a specific depth, accurate estimation of pile lengths is not possible. We recommend that AESI be retained to observe pile installation to confirm that our recommendations have been implemented, to verify that appropriate installation procedures.. are used, and 'that the appropriate refusal criteria are achieved. The City of Edmonds may require such special inspections as a condition of permitting. 01 Passive Resistance Grade beams and pile caps that are backfilled with structural fill may be designed for passive resistance against lateral translation using . an equivalent fluid equal to 150 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The passive resistance value includes a factor of safety equal to 3 in order to reduce the amount of movement necessary to generate passive resistance. Floor Support We recommend that the new'floors be structurally supported on perimeter foundations and framed over a crawl space,where feasible. To mitigate differential settlement, a 1-foot-thick, imported, free -draining structural fill blanket should be provided beneath proposed slabs�on-grade. - This free -draining. blanket may also. serve as a capillary break provided that it is comprised of a uniform -size (no fines) washed aggregate. Slab -on -grade floors should also be protected from dampness.by a 10-mil thick vapor retarder plastic sheeting, directly over the capillary break gravel blanket. If crushed. . rock or other sharp aggregate is used, a more puncture-resistan�t vapor retarder product should be used. Infiltration Rates According to the City of Edmonds, code infiltration rates can be determined by grain size analysis or field testing. For the purposes of this design, two exploration pits were excavated in the area of the proposed infiltration facility. At the base of the pits at or near the elevation of the bottom of the proposed trenches, samples were taken for laboratory testing. . The test results are attached to this letter in the Appendix. Sample 1 from the west end is classified as loamy sand. Sample 2 from the east end was als6 classified as loamy sand. Both samples were classified according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) classification system. Project Design and Construction Monitoring We. recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our earthwork and foundation recommendations may be properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation depends on proper' site preparation and construction procedures. Ina addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in -subsurface conditions become apparent. 10 We' appreciate the opportunity. to be of 'service� to you and are confident that -these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Frank S.'-Mocker, P.E.G. Senior Staff Geologist Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Appendix: Hand Auger Boring Logs Sieve Analysis/Soil Classification FSM/tb KE08077SA4 Projects\20080775\MWP 11 J%G Matthew A. Miller, P.E. Senior Associate Engineer f ME', rL6 5N 'pi— wa` 4 F 'r -w '15 S 1:4, U Al PLI "O'n I S4 f)L IZ ST Sw 172110 -�r S7, -s"I 72119 Mf.p S1 g. PL 17 - A z t -.77-"- , ". , I C -A 1WH T ST 174M j I = ST Sw 7- RICK lnit, k CL F- '3i - K, , - -, - I I : �6� H 176711 4 N-* V - z4i- '74, .1 "A 7:0 r NN I T V LS —S m P, 181 �T' f lk 1.4 Sw �6 ** - I ND 10 3RD --it- 4C t84711 ST -Sw cr, rL 'A PL 51 AbTM PL Zo RON v- P9 T Sw < 00 00 ST S Pft VT u c- -r (Aint u so PL SW ST Tp- IBM Sw N NI- r x ST St L !91ST -K S14. --je- 920 IST V S NO SCALE FIGURE 1 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. VICINITY MAP WHITE RESIDENCE DATE 1/09 EDMONDS, WA SHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE080775A w 1 Tr' f07 103, 1-4 RN I.A N L/7 .... - . ' ... .1. " . ' I 10 HA-2 00 pm! 10. . ..... HAA �g,`ADDMONCAPArx. WWDSHUP J, DRIVEWAY F.7 77. J95 LA WAr Ito 0177M F. 2.060 Sr 61 nni'm 34- LA WN 1-4 ww p HA-3 LAWN HA4 SE WER 89 -:j EAN OUT LIN Ev 7 1-4 WN r _kY, z NIJ Datum PL Fxl.vnwl KEYS7tIVE BL(XX- WALL +100' . . I i. 20' EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE ROAD Top of We ter Sh u Off I . I RECORD # 1024818 ..,FILE # 98-02120298 llalv� Cover. 0 20 SCALE IN FEET 5! Reference: WESCO GROUP Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. FIGURE 2 .4 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN WHITE RESIDENCE REMODEL DATE 1/09 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE0807�BA