The URL can be used to link to this page

18019 69TH PL W.PDF111111111111 5339 18019 69TH PL W rA ADDRESS: Pa-4 ca oo9,wz1a000 1700 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver M4tudy Required E] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DA PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: � &/nc. -�)Wb SCALED PLOT PLAN SEWER LID FEE LID #: SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: SOILS REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: 1 .4 LATEMP\DSrs\Fomis\Suwt File Checklist.doc APP PLA NING 8e no Legah Lot 17 Olympic View Crest >1 Addre ss: 18019 69* PL W. IP7 000 Parcel 0090 6400 0 Assessor's Tax 0 Owner. Westar Development Co. Inc A. �,m 3 16927 84h Ave. NE U'- Kenmore WA 98028 425487-2757 Uo* TO 0 ACCEPTXBLE TIq)kTLINE M SD_R 35 S R 0 N - 12 IMPERVIOUS SUWACE CALCULATIONS Proposed Building Pad 1244 SF t S65 -c- Proposed Garage 0 t Proposed Pabo &decks 320 SF Proposed Wakways 100 SF 'Proposed Drive 910 SF Impervious Surface 2574 SF 8001 SF Lot Size svol Lot Coverage 32% 2574 SF HEIGHT CALCULATIONS N Original Variance Proposed ......... .... W .19 A 346.W 346,50 345.00 346.50 C 350.00 346.50 346.50 0 348.00 Average Grade 34725 8.25 346.50 Datum CS 97 351.64 0.00. LL� cut I fill ?�15 Height of Structure 26.00 -66 3a -q�- Ma)dmum Nlowed 372.25 380.50 380.Z4, GRADING LU CALCULATIONS Uj CUT 196 CY vi cm C.-S. k CC FILL 135 CY Law*mg, RECEIV4D F— Balance'/ export 75 CY cojef— tn. ....... LD Cf) ALIG. 2 3 200 TOTAL 406 + LOT SLOPE UAMP PERMIT COUN ER Atltjhuv cu M0 Mi I F-Lj BY EN21NEERIN R & SEWER XdA "OdI9 INSP TIONS REQ'D. 912 CALL, 425-771-0220 EXT. 1326 Date: � A � M1 View Crest Legal: Lot 17� O"pic 41 Address: 18019 69* PLW. J Assessor's Tax Parcel #- 00" 6400 0017 000 db Owner. Westar Development Co. 189P. E C E I V E D 16927 80 Ave. -NE Kenmore WA 98M AUG 2 3 2004 425-487-2757 -He T IDOUNTER ?W 1044®ri" OW %4 -1 flAPERVUMSURFACE CALCMArAM Proposed Ekftng Pad 1244 SF 'C� Proposed Garage ID Proposal Patb M SF 4 decks Z i--;. 100 SF Proposw WaNciar Old SF Proposed Drive SF Irnper4mis Surface, 2574 Lat Sim 8001 SF -�-ALA Cowrage 32% 2574 SF HMtff MCULAMNS Original Variance Proposed A 346.00 348M B 345,00 W.60 7-1 r2i; C 350-00 346.50 0 s 348.00 346.50' Ayw ade 34725- 8.25 346.50 age Gr 351-64 DatuM = CB #7 cut I fill 0.00 H*ht of Structure 2�.00 25.00 33.82 6E� -Z'Mwdmum Affowed. 372-25 380.W -380;32�1�--� GMING CALCULA11ONS CUT 196 CY FILL 135 CY Balance export 75 CY TOTAL 406 WLT SLOPE 14% /+ APPI GVED AS NOTEb 34U. mr BY ENGINEERI Q aLs!'"n OWNEWCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE Date: SW F09 EROSION AND DAMAGE: IS i5 t4- + t- JA; ..4; + t,7 Af 1-7 Z4- 3+ 3-4-�7: -356 347 f 44� 4-3.-7 L RECrIVED f E -..AuG IT OU4 PERM-0 1 TE PLANNING DATA NAME:Vt-F,,k/- olv4d-ww'- DATE: 7/�/o SITE A DRESS: - I I VON 6P77 —14, PLAN CHK#:—C>q - VIT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A/t%,,- SFR REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?( �esNo MAP PAGE: 357 CORNER LOT: FLAG. LOT: OLe�s ZONING: CRIMCAL,"EAS DETERMINATIONM Wi ;QC Study Required: G^%Ared --/ P- W-U f ON U waiver Ll Conditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: L3 Fee U Checklist 0 Apo listw'/ notarized form L3 (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 It. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) Exempt CY SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: A street, A 5 Left Side: 7 i� Right Side:_7 Rear: Actual Setbacks: f o" Street: d- / Left Side: 16 Right Side: Rear: 3a Street map chocked for additional setback required? rYes; No DN U. DETACHED STRUCTURES: AJO-e frorrid Ll ROCKERIES: A164 El FENCESITRELLISES: AI'V4. Ll BAY WINDOWS I PROJECTING MODULATION: 0 V� STAIRS DECKS: K PARKING: Required: Actual: LOT AREA: Cd6o I LOT COVERAGE 010 Calculations: 01 BUILDING HEIGHT: Datum Point:-(647 Datum Elevation: Maximum AJlowed:- Actual Height: -3�1� -ov, ee4l"7- v A.D.U. CREATED?: r(NolbYes) SUBDIVISION: 7o� LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: (YesQ OTHER:- NewBPP1anningDataFomLD0C EU C UffacmSoffin a as ago** as so**% CU MER as EUC CONTACT FORM A coordinated utility environment which maximizesioint utility opportunities to provide quality servicefor the citwxm ofEdmonds ........... ................... . ....... . ... I . ... . .................... YOU WILL BE GIVEN A CONFIRMATION NUMBER By EACHUTILITy ONCE YOU HAVE INFORMED THEM OF YOUR PROJECT. SITE ADDRESSt P. 0 # -3 Rich Afdem - 42�-670-3208 You will need to provide PUD with a site plan and a completed New Service Questionnaire. PUGET SOUND DOW # Z,7 Z— DouWg Usi - 42-5-35&7520 Or New Customer Construction Department- 1-88&321-7i79 # -Q- I C o ci, P0 60 "-S 0 Rosemary Randall- 425-7104124 Dave Hawltins, - 425-7104120 You will need to provide GIT with the location of your project, total.line requirement, and the date in which service is required. Chmbm Cable # CC, 0 714,CO Les Pedc - 425-774-5146 FEB I PERMIT Go LINTER Steve Dunphy - 425-77+7769 You will need to provide OVWSD with the survey map of your site and compleWa For customers in Olympic View Service Area development information fimn. THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND GIVEN TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF AT THE TIME OF PERMIT SUBMrITAL L �qx 9c jigIt 'e t I i -! A t : 2A1.3 Cil m ;1 . pi Egg at cc NU m-I §m L i cc kl' Pie ilia Mula te 'Q, 411 1 ZgR-�Wpo Ail w gn;p-q Pig 19 . �?-' � 1 9 - n' A-1 IRV I . a -42 ;� -Aft .... .. PH '1- I'Afiz 20"2285003 LINE TAB Lot LOW DIRUCTINDIV I YS""cE 2 Ll."'. -111 lo 1 -?a 2o as 6*7 11 7A6--C4'-' h 21 2. M 15'29'E M .Ol. L� w; doN.- to. �707 N 1�1'10T STH_. x iidlispro E 75-85 "Ir ,00.j. 1 1179— IW8925'oq 2175' ELI'-2'--6jtw Itr a §319, L" 1 16 011,Ll 12402 1 I I fzfzl V45 r4o 180 TW_ STIF _ _ _ _j E ET §w M.- -7- P .... ..... 17 20 21 22 cAsOaI' SHAMI 01—, - - oo! I OIL.- f7 EA LME TABLE L Hasur. p am., M),."/ 10 /* L U .02 Do rAS&N7 EL2 r"cAu Y .01 9 A'114-1 c M .1. A2. a,. I R6 N2WJ4 I "'XIZ 10 B L 0 LIR W I jffl� —1 -' 2 C, VeMS I C4 72aco' 129.-52' C3 2�w 7 In; ww a 9 CIO CII 5ow jH." 204' -v,,a- 23 16 '41' 1 C? _WUo— —2K�-28'j9"-5" L2 Cy :1��5a.00'— 5"m 12 M! 00 C 5. ;j I .; 15 Is C17 CIS 27�ou MOO 16.11 OJW 12- IS cl. "I" I 17 C20 27100' A. ill 62VIla. --i Is_. 20 21100' 24.4 —OS� Ft 20 —C2j 4 2100' 39. SOWOO 19 U5 MOO 47.W IM59-M 19 9�g ._- C26 427� 5 39 �' 4%" 041-22-27: 0, 78_ 06 M C2. P 7 - 2 - " " " -- .." . '�o o/ P, I �p v . C . I M.TF SIDE "I lo* SEKER EAS"ENT 4-1 "0 12 A., .1. 4.j� /Nb SEWR 4 uo'ww p 1 -6.85. z' "'71 . .,"' 'b. , 5 'A' "'CDR--E'Z w �:' , .1 , . val 4 el .1 r PACT ")o —'0' SE 7 0' 40' EASEM; GRAPHIC SCALE ......... 14 6 0 f20 ur 7 �wf�s EQUIPMENT & PROCED 9 I INCH - 60 FEET 7 SAM OF MAJMM* RAI Ot A HILL KLUME ?A PACE ff.% BEMM FOUND LEkEN6--- W&VUhIENTS 0V 180M &W, AS N BITOWSO- CH 3o AWTHM OF stww". SET yr x 2,-!Wblp v RELD MAWRSE OF ENSMO AIO&%NLWIATfoK W AMMT 19" R.L UM*Fy. A' ASSOC&VM III IV.0 I"5j, 'AT ALL.<& AND MA.CY'CORWRS SET CASib 4_ r*4_ PYRAIAD4t.CONCRVTr UrT7 SET 3 ELECn?O.0 TOTAL STATION wavumENr x7' sRoNzE a6k sTmpEo PRECOM i lio., "'&L. OLYMPIC VIEW CREST MEETS OT E�CEEVS i0IC M2-130-000 REOLVENFENTS EVSt?HO �OIWUQVT � CASE. LAST VFSITEO P 96-72 NOTES IN THE NZ 114 OF TW N-w IA SECMN 17. T. 27 N.. A 4 E. W.M. rOVND REeAR OR IftN POE AS CITY OF MMCNVS� SMOHOANSH COLWTY. WASMNGMN 1. LOTS 8. It AMY TF? CT M SMALL HAW A IVDE� LAA—ST �1911—E PfRUAAfWT CLEAJF ZONE MR SICHr OFSTANCE D AUGLISt 19" R.L Ata"Y & ASS A TES, M. 2. LOT 17 HAS THE AMUTY TO ACCESS LOT 15ADMWI40Y ON �WDE (N) PWT . . .�SM. ENWJEMNG ANALYSIS TO ESTABL SAFE CCESS FOR LOT IT ALONG (R) "AD". SMW� . ftA� . MAHAG�NF FRONTAGE OT 69M RACE WST. MIT lIVILE [ISFIZ, �IOI 20 f'25) 2�� 1. (10) 2M.10$ 0 0 PLANNING DATA NAME: ldt�t-r-� &'6v, 0, -7�. DATE:-3/t 3 / 2 61:13 SITEADDRESS: lkoi') - -7. -W, PLAN CHK#: 0 3 - 0!5-t PROJECT DESCRIPTION: F-1., z t 3 5'4 A . QA�o REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED?: MAP PAGE: 35-7 CORNER LOT: ffesq� �No FLAG LOT: (Yes ZONING: P-S-g — CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATIONM 5`2 - 0 / -4 -� I Ed Study Required: ��- f Aove-A Ar SL�p 61-19ti &, s,;it OXi S.&Uv, -04 Ll Waiver DConditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: L1 Fee LJ Checklist LJ APO list w/ notarized form Ll (Needed for 500 cubicyards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) Exempt 7VO SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: Street: 2�13' Left Side: Right Side: 7. T, Rear: t S- Actual Setbacks: Street: 2-,V Left Side: Right Side: "S, 5-' Rear: 3 3 Street map chocked for additional setback required? (Yes No DNA) Ll DETACHED STRUCTURES: aROCKERIES: P1, Ll FENCEsrrRELLISES: U BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION- AVW7 STAIRS/ DECKS: X"-4 it-4— --F PARKING: Required:—�- Actual: 3 LOT AREA: LOT COVEKAUk:: 5- 2 , C47- Calculations: BUILDING HEIGHT: e- tv,-j Datum Point: 6�- 02p5Q:� Datum Elevation:-351. 64- Maximum Allowed: w '& -r Z=,t� c*Ictual Height: A.D.U. CREATED?: MoV Yes) W-4A 1% 6- SUBDIVISION: 94t'72- Le, /7 LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: (Yes / Ck OTHER: AA� 1-7 1 ix- 9, Z-9' A,� AAA-.f p"C' tl'4' pt.z' 7,0, i5i'v' P6---4. --1 Ap.," 4;7 6--4 e' Plan Review By: C/ 144 140- NewBPP1an.ningDataForm.D0C 3 3A -3 ov- 3 5> W, 4 34 7.4, 1,� 90 3-77, 34 7 45 3ra t4i5 3 7Z, 5 4- k" 7-1; 3 8'c,. 3eo, 75 6m EASEMENT VNE TAPLE N ct I r 9 fe— ELJ N28*34r 31.% __, 7_ ,M_Z$ a,, 10 mijud-R-r J11,95, Lj7 N-04,51T -Iddl' Mix PEW %w wotp or Svc. I na 000 L OFFO—El' !—W ft Ov 4^00, -Mir ........ .... past 17 9 1- 4 W�flll� - lit A ll,., tie ORO w RLI u I.E. U, unuff ED OWOLV y I laaw Sr A.* &(WUD lid IISL%3,111� zi P-A S.F to, ff ow C43cwlwf AYJY 2, to it S1. so-aw. 10010Z . . . . . . . . I '191 hi A Li T Ak lot . -N it - .. , I M. 41) & MY'Aff VX St. 4 to I A OWMWO I,. Alto G A LrLjrr tj L 7 e — - —IV, ,ffi . IRIV �- �.lce .11 -- .,w '10 1131!-_ 71 13 5 02 tA vA 19 to * " bi --Fo— Oil ii TJR C T C30 1p je GRAPHIC SCAL 77,t,� top* I&TH - 60 rEEF EQUlPWJvr &-PRncED 9 &AM OF BIANNO FlAl Or bfAJ)RONA M%4 "%L&Vf 1% PACC its, Itrwrij IWAV 4VAVu#WrS ON (S*n4 JOK. AS V 6OVd-50- Vt M I or Milt". nW J*A,443y Of CAISIN)G WONYMPOAPIOU VO OVOWT 01" uf,7 Srr j lczcmay.c rou.- frAnow P" COROPI wills 04 Excuor w4c JJZ-1-10-dw provW16013 NO L LorS 0, $1 AND MACY "t SNALt HAW A 13' OffP ptqvAv_dwr c-fAR IMT 1`041 VON' VISIRACt. j. lot r7 ;�AS 141' A0117V ru ACCIS COY is "llrWay ON pfic"Of L%VA,rf . a $MALME fO OYAWS-4 SAfr AC(CSS COO LO' " Al*%'G rRM,Acf Cor aliv Plicir KS!� LEGE S-1 1/2- 124' RCOAV WAAP 1080SWO Ai. 1�. alcouffr Ar Af-SWAl". Itit *.I.w U041 W IdA69. Af ALL IGY AK* MACY CoRuffts Ul CMM A- 9 A' PV*AVADA' CONTRM #MNEXF Wl' PAOM VISK SUMPID modi ICO69 �jSnh-G 11*FMIWWI W CAX IAS' W5110 MOW 19ft a rWKID 1111AN Of OON F%PC AS "$C*WO- tor %wro AMSr Vt: (At ffA&A- AA NOL - 2WR CA $WIN I DffrAFL 'A I v%*4 . 30 MY (N I Or WE N.lK 1 6�01?1 17. T 27 R.. R. 4 L, WA ory or MUM= VMWMJSW 0"rY WASK*fG7W R,L AL-vWVY & ASSOCIArES. EMO USE COM&TANTS XV22M" 3 plawfERS 9 SWWVWS a PJAIRM .6 Jim wir #mir rolm. W.9wr" wx AM) r- 5 lu AM r-lyt, I gr %kical Areas Checkfil% ------ ----------------------------- Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) I Site AddressfLocation: 2. Property Tax Account Number f -7V7o,;( o�o 000 # -7 a- 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet); 4-f 4. Is this site currently developed? d,-- yes; no. - If yes; how is site developed? lg� 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Z-- Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. A:�' Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet -over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). ,4,f—Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a 'horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 4)0 ;Approx. Depth: 7 — 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: AX) Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the ydar? 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. P 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows agross the grounds surface?hlows are year- round? V 1A Flows are- seasonal? Id (What time of year'? 10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: jt i I.Pe, NO "_YWj sube. U , 474. SR�. 10 owm ATTACHMENT 12 . I O� A C) E D44 _ Est. lB93 1 80th St. SW Private Drive 18019 69th PI W (b 14.5' PROP MIKI LLJ u ry < r) LLJ x x x CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS SCALE 18019 69th PI W HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR -WESTAR _w DATE DRAWN PE MIT 10/12/2004 BY 1. ABILA NO. 9884 NTS m k, ADDRESS HOMEOWNER W, DATE DRAWN At 1890 BY I (;a� 4- CONTRACTOR w PERMIT NO, q- SCALE 6r, FILS- lboil (,qrH-P_, LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science March 2. 2005 Mr. Larry Seitz Westar Development Company, Inc. 16927-84 1h Avenue NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Dear Mr. Seitz: Subject: Stability of Keystone Block Walls Single -Family Residence 180 19 — 691h Place West Edmonds, Washington IV IRF-U MAR t �VRMII At your request, we have inspected and evaluated the stability of the Key -tone block walls constructed on the subject residence site. Presented in this letter report are our findings and conclusions. A curvinor Kevstone 'segment concrete block wall (hereinafter referred to as Wall 1) is constructed to line a toe cut alona the north and west lot lines, and a straight wall (hereinafter referred to as Wall 2) line the south lot line of the subject residence. Wall 2 is a single -tier wall linina the, south side of the driveway and garage of the subject residence, and stands at about 4 feet tall. About the middle half of Wall I splits into two tiers, with the lower tier wall stands up to 3 feet 4 inches tall and the upper tier up to 2 feet 8 inches tall, and the upper tier wall is set back at 2.0 feet from the lower tier wall. Wall I is within about 15 to 20 feet of the sidewalk to the west and within about 4 feet of the neiahbor's driveway to the north at its closest point. The area between Wall I and the sidewalk is now covered with grass sod and shredded bark, and the I area between Wall I and the neighbor's driveway is mostly bare. We understand that the stabilitv of Wall I is the main concern, and hence the subject of our stability evaluation. 19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Phone (425) 483-9134 Fax (425) 486-2746 March 12005 Mr. Larry Se'tz/Westar Development Pa2e 2 Two typical sections of Wall I are shown on Plate 1. attached hereto. You stated that a perforated PVC drain pipe is installed along the base in front of the lower tier wall, and that crushed rock filled trenches are constructed under the base -course of the lower -tier block wall at to 4 points to hydraulically connect the sand backfill to the drain pipe in front of the wall.-. The drain pipe is then tightlined to the drain line of the roof drain system. You also informed us that free -draining sand is used to backfill the block walls, and that the sand backfill is placed in lifts no more than 12 inches thick with each lift compacted with a vibratory plate compactor to a non - yielding state. It is our opinion that the block walls constructed as you described should have adequate drainage control provision. As presented on our 10/29/04 letter, the original surficial'soil unit at the residence site and its vicinity is mapped as advance outwash deposits of dense to very -dense, slightly silty. fine to medium sand with a trace to some gravel. The native undisturbed advance outwash soils are quite stable. We understand the roadbed of the neichbor*s driveway to the north is constructed with structural fill placed over the advance outwash deposit. The structural fill was compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor method), monitored and certified by Nelson- C ouvrette Associates. It is our opinion that cut slopes or fill embankments at 2H: IV in such structural fill material or in the compacted sand backfill of the block walls should be able to maintain stability. The surficial soils on the slope next to the north neighbor's driveway may have been disturbed by construction traffic. The disturbed soils should be compacted with a vibratory plate compactor to a non -yielding, state, and the slope should be seeded and covered with a layer of straw mulch. Shrubs may also be planted on the slope to provide erosion protection. With multi -tier walls, the general rule of thumb is that the upper -tier wall should be set back from the lower -tier wall a horizontal distance at least equal to the height of the lower -tier wall in LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. March 2, 2005 Mr. Larry Seitz/Westar Development Pa2e ') order not to exert additional surcharge on the lower -tier wall. This is based on the assumption that the pressure envelope of the foundation load of the upper -tier wall spreads downward at a 45-dearee an -le. In dense native soils or structural fill. the pressure develop may actually be spreading downward at a steeper angle, and thus requires less setback of the upper wall. The Keystone block walls constructed on the subject residence appear to be stable, with no signs of movement, such as tilting, bulging or sliding. The pressure envelope from the upper -tier foundation load does not appear to an adverse impact on the stability of the lower -tier wall of Wall 1. Based on our observation of the conditions of the Keystone walls built on the subject residence site, it is our conclusion that the one -tier portion of the block walls is stable. The two -tiered portion of the walls appears to be stable without any discernable movement. even though the upper -tier is not set back far enough from the lower -tier wall according normal rule of practice. Please call if you have any questions. 15N 27 '5, B9 NA Yours very truly, LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. a� ft_-4-� J. S. (Julia� Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Consultina Geotechnical Engineer Attach.: Plate I — Typical Sections of Keystone Block Wall LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. '�H : IV P L AT T'6)9, "2 11 P E— W A 0 e, Krz,f 9 ro A P_ L.O.( 'K emp. CUT MAX. Cori p/_\CTC-.0 P(LL- '4 r v C, V ;Z1&j r4 p f till C?,L)S 46-0 (?,OCK r-ILL60 0 I-TC�4 e 5 f4 eb� H 6o9k� AT CL06W Pr)' �H nq OK I COM FACTeD ;: Rz-e 4 4 7 � . Lo t,� �10 RrH LOT L (r� S P�PICAL SECTIONS - KEYSTONE BLOCK WAL LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 18019 - 69TH PLACE WEST Geotechnical Engineering � Engineering Geology - Earth Science EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. -I DATE 3/2/05 PLATE 1 :51- r-1 LF— March 24, 2005 City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 5h Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attn: Lyle Chrisman RE: GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF RETAINING WALLS 1801969TH PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Chrisman: LANDAU ASSOCIATES RECEIVED . MAR 2 5 2005 ENGINEEFaNG DIVISION In accordance with your request, Landau Associates completed a geotechnical engineering peer review of correspondence and typical cross sections prepared by the developer's geotechnical engineer related to modular block gravity walls constructed near the north and northwest property boundaries at 18019 69th Place West in Edmonds, Washington. This review was conducted under Landau Associates' .On -Call - Geotechnical. Engineering. Services, Agreement, with the City ... of..Edmonds., and.,Task,, Order No.,05-02.,. We have reviewed a letter prepared,by Liu & Associates dated -March 2, 2005, a.letter,from the City of Edmonds.date.d. March 7, 2005, requesting an evaluation of the surcharge influence of traffic on the adjacent driveway,.and a response letter from Liu & Associates dated. March. 21,.2005. We have also reviewed a. hand sketch of dimensions and elevations of the existing wall configuration prepared by Lyle Chrisman of the City of Edmonds to better. understand the overall configuration and heights of the. existing wall. Landau Associates concurs with the findings and conclusions of Liu & Associates' March 21, 2005 letter that addresses the influence of the driveway traffic surcharge and concludes that the driveway should exert minimal or no surcharge. pressure on the block wall given the most critical section described in the letter prepared.by Liu & Associates. However, Landau Associates is concerned about,the. overall configuration of, the, wall. and, in particular the configuration of the two-,tiered.wall.system,: It is, our opinion that. the upper wall, which is set back from.the,lower-tier,Nyall. a horizontal distance les than the, height of the lower -tier -wall,, would i"ose,a. surcharge on the lower wall in this two-tier wall system. We agree with the statement in .� . �1, -: :., � 1 Liu & Associates. March 2,�-,2005 letter that,',the general rule ofthumbis,that,the.0 per�jierwall ..should be P p ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL NAfURAL RESOURCES' 130 2nd Avenue South - Edmonds, WA 98020 - (425) 778-0907 - fax (425) 778-6409 - www.landauinc.com SEATTLE - SPOKANE - TACOMA - PORTLAND set back from the lower -tier wall a horizontal distance at least equal to the height of the lower -tier wall in order not to exert additional surcharge on the lower -tier wall." Limited information has been provided to assess the stability of the two-tier wall. Liu & Associates states that the wall is a Keystone block wall. Information was not provided to us as to the block size and no calculations were provided to support the design of the wall in its current configuration. The approximate block size has been described to us and we have compared this to technical literature from Keystone Retaining Wall Systems. The block size described is consistent with the Keystone "Compac" unit blocks. The Keystone technical literature indicates that the recommended maximum wall height for a modular block wall constructed of the Keystone Compac units is 3 ft, without soil reinforcement and no surcharges (no slopes, roadways, etc.). The height of the existing wall, whether in a single wall ortwo�-tierconfiguration, exceeds 3 ft- in some areas and has a -sloping backfill-.— The Keystone technical literature also cautions. that a two-tier wall can impose higher stresses in the lower wall when the height of the.lower wall is greater than the horizontal space created by the terrace between the walls. This configuration is also consistent with the City of Edmonds requirements for spacing between rockery walls, which in many ways are similar to modular block gravity walls. Liu & Associates states in their March 2, 2005 letter that "the Keystone block walls constructed on the subject residence appear to be stable, with no signs of movement, such as tilting, bulging, or sliding." Liu & Associates also states that the two -tiered wall configuration is not according to the 14non-nal rule of practice." In our opinion, the current absence of signs of imminent failure of the wall do notprovide the necessary assurance that the wall will perform as intended over the long term. Since the information currently available to us indicates that the wall system does not appear to comply with the manufacturer's recommendations regarding wall height and the configuration of tiered walls, we recommend that the stability of the wall and slope configuration be evaluated with en gineering calculations to provide appropriate design support for the current configuration, or remedial measures be taken to -increase the stability of the current wall and. slope system. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. Principal DRS/ltm Cc: Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds Building Official 3/24105 \\Ednidala\wproc\074\130\1801969thPIW_GeotRoview.doc 2 LANDAu AssocIATES 9884- PERMIT-NO: PERMIT EXPIRE Cit of Edmo.nds ity S1 SIDE SEWER PERMI.T . Address of Construction: /0 0 / q bqf� R (-,(j Property Tax. Account Parcel No Attach copies of all access and till Owner and/or Contractor: Contractor License #: 14single Family Multi -Family (No. of Units Commercial (No. of Units [:]Public "C. 1-6-7 Ve rified and Approved b ilding Permit Invasion into City *Right -of Way: El Yes No *RW Construction Permit # Cross other "Private Property: El Yes N�fNo I **Attach.legal description and copy of recorded"easement. 6zlontractor Owne4 r cqVt tjr�i ��ah�re and acknowledgement statement: Date f r ing er I� By M enii thi perm I ertify that I have read the City's public handout entitled ide Sewer Specifications, and shall comply with all City requirements outlined therein. 12 CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424'r-5555) BEFORE ANVEXCAVATION 2 .19 FOR INSPECTION -CALL 425-771-0220. extensiontE%4R. .24 HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REOUESTS .................. .. ........... . ........ . . .... FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Per mit Fee,$ Repair Fee $ . ..... . ... Issued ByL r Date Issued Assessment Fee $ Receipt No: City Permit Surcharge Fee *.<o To tal Fees Paid NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -I NSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED.. Job Site Ready YES NO Date: Initial: Partial Inspection: Date: 11 S1641nitial: Partial Inspection: Date: Initial: FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: 1161100r Initial: As -built to Street File: PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE f� White,Copy: File. Green Copy- Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant L;temp;bldg;forms;�spennitjlg4/00 2) Of EDA,, 0 ADDRESS Ali HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR SCALE IDRAWN w --T-PERMIT 1890 BY NO. 1 80th St. SW x Private Drive C5 18019 69th PI w N qD C; PROP, PIN. Lu 14.5' LLI LL_ X < 0 LLJ 4" CO 4- 4.5' DEEP Co PVC 7 2 it FOUNDATION —2.5'- 27' x E CITY OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT "10 ADDRESS SCALE 18019 69th PI W NTS HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR -WESTAR 1-w Est. 1B913 DATE 10/12/2004 DRAWN BY- 1. ABILA PERMIT NO. 9884 1 80th St. SW Private Drive 18019 69th PI W e7 14.5' PROP milli LLJ X < n X LLJ x x 5' -X x x x x x x x x x x x CITY'OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS -BUILT ADDRESS SCALE 18019 69th PI W NTS HOMEOWNER CONTRACTOR WES AR W DATE 10/12/2004 DRAWN BY 1. ABILA PERMIT NO. 9884 Est. 10) /� C. 1 S9,3 0 CITY OF EDMONDS SltEET FILE 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 -'FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Westar Development Company March 30, 2005 Larry J. Seitz 16927 84h Avenue Northeast Kenmore, Washington 98028 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 69"' Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. Seitz: Thank you for meeting with City Officials today regarding the driveway retaining wall design and surcharge issue. In attendance at the meeting was Mr. Dennis Stettler, P.E., the City's geotechnical consultant with Landau Associates, Inc. and your engineer Mr. Liu, P.E.. Your proposal to the City is to: Remove the upper retaining wall tier; Cut into the hillside and rebuild the upper wall a minimum of four feet back from the lower wall --closer to the driveway. The lower wall height has been measured by Mr. Liu to be approximately 3 feet 5 inches in height. Mr. Liu indicated that the upper wall finished height will not exceed four feet and that there is sufficient space between the lower wall and the driveway such that the rebuilt upper wall will not support a driveway surcharge and will not impose a surcharge on the lower wall (in order to avoid permitting requirements). Mr. Liu recommends structural backfill to be placed behind the upper wall (i.e., crushed rock) to reduce driveway surcharge affects. Drainage pipe will also be placed behind the upper wall and be piped to an approved system. You will contact the City when the work is complete. Once the retaining wallis completed the bond will be released and final occupancy may be granted. The City re-emphasized that if any portion of the wall exceeds 4 feet in height or supports a surcharge, a permit is required. On a related issue, you have decided to re -locate the neighbors' water service line and place it between the paved portion of the existing driveway and the upper tier of the re -located wall. You will be responsible to notify the neighbor of temporary water shutoff. It is understood that a portion of the structural backfill placed against the wall may be replaced with sand due to minimum water service line embedment requirements. You understand that you are required to contact the City Engineering Technician for inspection, of the relocated line —before -you backfill. Please contact me at 425 771-0220 if I have not accurately reflected the actions that you are intending to take. Sincerely, Jeannine L. rjraf Building Official Cc: Duane Bowman, Director of Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 "? C. 1 B913 0 SAEET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering Mr. Larry Seitz Westar Development Company 16927 84aAvenue Northeast Kenmore, WA 98028 March 7, 2005 RE: 18019 691h Place West (Lot 17), Edmonds, WA — Retaining Wall Dear Mr. Seitz: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR We have reviewed the letter dated March 2, 2005 from Liu & Associates, which you submitted to the City on March 4, 2005, concerning the subject retaining wall. The conclusions in the letter do not satisfy our requirement that the engineer clearly state that the existing wall does not support a driveway surcharge. In our meeting with you on March 1, 2005, we explained to you very clearly that the immediate question that must be answered regarding your retaining wall is whether or not a permit is required. We explained to you that the determining factor as to whether a permit is required is whether or not the retaining wall supports surcharge from the adjacent driveway. Our observation, based upon the close proximity of the retaining wall to the driveway, is that it does support surcharge and that, therefore, a permit is required. If you wish to pursue a determination that a permit is'not required, you must submit an evaluation and report from a geotechnical engineer that demonstrates that the retaining wall does not support a surcharge. Upon receipt of this evaluation and report, we will submit it for peer review, for which you will be required to pay a peer review fee. The evaluation must include corresponding calculations and dimensioned drawings for peer review approval; OR, if you agree that the retaining wall supports a surcharge, then you must submit an application.for a permit and include all required submittal information (refer to Retaining Wall Perm it Submittal Requirements) including appropriate fees. Note, peer review will be required. On Friday, March 4, 2005, you asked the City Engineer if the City would accept a bond for the retaining wall. This request has been reviewed with the Director and has been determined that a bond is not appropriate in this situation and, therefore is not an acceptable alternative. Lastly, I remind you that occupancy prior to final occupancy approval is a violation of the Building Code and is subject to fines. Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: J.S. Liu, Ph.D., P.E., Liu & Associates Dave G6ert, City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 - . - .. .. I -"PC. 18913 0 CITY OF EDMONDS CREET FILE 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwdedmonds.wa.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Westar Development Company March 24, 2005 Larry J. Seitz 16927 84h Avenue Northeast Kenmore, Washington 98028 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 69th Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 VIA FACSIMILE Dear Mr. Seitz: Regarding the driveway retaining wall design and surcharge issue, the City"s geotechnical consultant Landau Associates, Inc. has completed review of Mr. Llu's, P.E., submittal and a copy of their review letter dated March 24, 2005 is enclosed. Please note that Landau concludes that the series of retaining walls were not built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and the upper wall imposes a surcharge on the lower wall in the two tiered system. It was also noted that the walls are not constructed to City approved design standards. Because of these issues it is the decision of the City that the entire wall be reconstructed under a building permit. Please be advised that the new wall shall be designed per manufacturer specifications as well as City design standards. Engineering calculations shall be provided to justify the design. 'Me City shall utilize Landau Associates to perform the future design peer review and you are responsible for the peer review fees. Once the permit is issued the City shall require special inspection and geotechnical evaluation (to be perfon-ned by a state licensed geotechnical engineer) during the course of reconstruction and work must be completed within 30 days of permit issuance. Enclosed is a copy of the City's handout for Retaining Walls. Pursuant to your request, temporary occupancy may be granted while you are progressing with correcting the driveway retaining wall condition. If temporary occupancy is granted by the City a bond for the reconstruction of the driveway retaining wall shall be posted in the amount of $10,000.00, (bond form previously provided to you) prior to temporary occupancy approval. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer duning City business hours. If you and Mr. Liu desire to meet with City Officials or representatives of Landau Associates we can schedule such a meeting but be advised if Landau attends the meeting you will be charged for this service. Sincerely, Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Duane Bowman, Director of Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 9125 712 M9 UNHU WHHTE� 1V 0 0 March 24, 2005 LANDAU ASSOCLATES City of Edmonds Development Services Department BULDING .121 5`h Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 MAR 2 4 2oo5 Attn: Lyle Chrisman RE: GF-OTF-CHMCAL REviEwOF RETAINING WALLS 18019 69"a PLACE WEST IEDMOKIDS, WASHINGTON Dear Mr. Chrisman: In accordance with your request, Landau Associates completed a geotechaical engineering peer review of correspondence and typical cross sections prepared by the developer's geotechnical engineer related to modular block gravity walls constructed near the no(th and northwest property boundaries at 18019 69d' Place West iti Edmonds, Washington. This review was conducted under Lzmdau Associates' On -Call Geotechnical Engineering Services Agreement with the. City of Edmonds and Task Order No. 05-02. We have reviewed a letter prepared by Liu & Associates dated March 2, 2005, a letter from the City of Edmonds dated March 7, 2005 requesting an evaluation of the surcharge influence of traffic on the adjacent driveway, and a response letter from Liu & Associates dated Ma. . rch 21, 2005. We have also revieweda hand sketch of dimensions and elevations of the existing wall configuration prepared by Lyle Cbrisman of the City of Edmonds to better understand the overall configLiraTion and heights of the existing wall. Landau Associates concurs with the findings and conclusions of Liu & Associates' March 21, 2005 letter that addresses the influence of the driveway traffic surcharge and concludes that the driveway should exert min4m] or no surcharge pressure on the block wall given the most critical section described in the letter prepared by Liu & Associates. However, Landau Associates is concerned about the overall configuration of the wall and in particular the configuration of the two -tiered wall 5ystem. It is our opinion that the upper wall, which is set back from the lower -tier wall a horizontal distance less than the height of the lower -tier wall, would impose a surcharge on the lower wall in this two-tier wall system.- We agree with the statement in Liu & Associates March 2. 2005 letter that -the general rule of thumb is that the upper -tier wall should be ENVIRONMENTAL GCOTECHNICAL I NATURAL RESOURCES 130 2nd Avenue South - Edrnond-..WA9K0 - (425)778-0907 f-(425)778-6409 - wvm.1andau;rc.com SEATTLE - SPOKANC - TACOMA PORTLAND C I � T I N C 0 3 / 2 1 / 6 5 1 0 8 P . 10 3 0 0 3 V 12 5 7 7 8 6 1 � 9 L i H D k set back from the lower -tier wall a horizontal distance at least equal. to the height of the lower -tier wall. in order not to exert additional surcharge on the lower -tier wall." Limited - information has been provided to assess the stability of the two-tier wall. Liu & Associates states that.the wall. is a Keysto ne block wall- Infon-nation was not provided to us as to the block size and no calculations were provided to support the design of the wall in its current configuration. The approximate block size has been described to us and we have compared this to technical literature from Kcysione Retaining Wall Systems. The block size described is consistent with the Keystone "Compac" unit blocks. The Keystone technical literature indicates that the recommended maximum wall height for a modular block wal.1 constructed of the Keystone Compac: units is 3 ft, without soil reinforcement and no surcharges (no slopes, roadways, etc.). The height of the existing waH, whether in a single wall or Ewo-tier configuration, exceeds 3 ft in some areas and has a sloping backfill. The Keystone technical literature also cautions that a two-tierw-all can impose higher stresses in the lower wall when the height of the lower wall is greater than the horizontal space created by the terrace between the walls. This configuration is also consistent with the City of Edmonds requirements for spacing between rockery walls, which in many ways are similar to modular block gravity walls. Liu & Associates states in their March 2, 2005 letter that "the Keystone block walls constructed on the subject residence appear to be stable� with no signs of movement. such as tilting, bulging, or sliding." Liu & Associates also states that the two -tiered wall configuration is not according to the "normal rule of practice." In our opinion, the current absen&c of signs of imminent failure of the wall do not provide the necmary assurance that the wall will perform as intended over the long term. Since the information currently available to us indicates that the wall system does not appear to comply with the manufActurer's recommendations regarding wall heigbE and the configuration of tiered walls, we recommend that the stability of the, wall and slope configuration be evaluated with engineering calculations to provide appropriate design support for the current configur;ttion, or remedial measures be taken to increase the stability of the current wall and slope system. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Dennis R. Stertler, P.E. Principal DRS/Itm Cc: Jeannine Graf, City of Edmonds Building Official 312vDS \\Eaftaia\wproc\074\13W 8019 69M Pi W—Gacolavlew.doc 2 LANDAu AssociATEs 4REET FILE /00/ � � (?- /I':-/ W WestarDevelopment Compan.9 Inc. 16927 84th Ave. N.E. Kenmore, WA. 98028 March 10, 2005 Pad Madja Vru&ula 18021 69dPI W Edmonds, WA 98026 Re: Water Serview Dear Ms. Vrudhula: (425) 487-2757 C- I J9 i Ea. In MAR 1 2005 OEVELOPMENT SERVICES During the construction of a residence on Westar's property located at 18019 691h PI W (the '�Property"), Westar encountered a water -line, which serves your property, well within the boundaries of the Property. At considerable expense, Westar attempted to relocate the water -line in order to satisfy the ruluirements of the City of Edmonds. -1be City of FAlmonds has imposed additional requirements that Westar'is unable'to comply with as the water -line was installed unproperly by your contractor. Ifi addition to the above, your contractor failed to obtain an easement from Westar prior to placement of the water -fine on the Property; therefore, the reason for this letter. Westar hereby demands that you bring the water -line up to code (at your expense) and, in conjunction therewith, obtain approval ftom die City of Edmonds. Additionally, it will be necessary for you to obtain an easement across the 'Property -fbf the water -fine (also at your expense). Time is of the essence. Ile improper placement of the water -line is delaying the closing of the sale of the Property. Unless this matter is resolved inimediately, you will be responsible for any and all costs incurred due to the improper placement of the water -fine and the resulting delay of Westar's closing. Further, absent immediate resolution, Westar will be left with no alternative other than to disconnect the water -line, and remove the water -line from the Property. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Sincerely L-Mry J� Seitz. President Uc: I . ' . Jun Frits I Frits and L-conardson Du, city of Edindiids 0 S'RqEET FILE February 12, 2005 Mr. Duane Bowman Director of Development Services City of Edmonds 121 50'Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 R E C E 110" E D- FEB 2 � 20o-5 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RE: Excavation in the area of private driveway a�,017 69h PL. W. Mr. Bowman: Alan H. Muzzy 18017 69th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 425-670-8845 I am contacting you on behalf of Olympic View Crest Homeowners' Association, especially those who are responsible for the future maintenance and upkeep of the private road under discussion. Long-term stability of the road remains in question due to improper excavation of the adjacent building site. In her letter of September 14, 2004, Jeanine Graf included a technical memorandum from Landau Associates to Dave Gebert expressing several concerns about the stability of the excavated bank and water line. In response, Ms. Graf ordered Westar Development Company Inc to impose road use restrictions pursuant to UBC Section 3307 because, as she stated, the driveway "may be susceptible to further failure until repaired under the direction and supervision of the property owner's licensed geotechnical engineer." (emphasis added). Per your letter of September 15, 2004 to Ron Trickett, Homeowners Association President, Westar was ordered to: • "Obtain the services of a licensed geotechnical engineer to perform a detailed site investigation and submit a plan that includes temporary and permanent erosion control and slope protection measures and monitoring." • "Immediately perform any work deemed emergency by the geotechnical engineer." • "Report any additional slope sloughing or failures or driveway undermining immediately to the City Engineer." Several homeowners observed continued sloughing of the middle and upper portions of the bank undermining the edge of the roadway. I contacted the City Building Department in late November to again express my concerns regarding the continued erosion of the slope, requesting an inspection prior to commencement of work on the retaining wall while the bank was still exposed. During . the week of December 6, pallets of landscaping blocks were delivered to the site and work on the wall began during the week of December 13. In my absence, my wife contacted the City again and an inspector was dispatched to the site. In his letter dated December 17 2004, Mr. Lyle Chrisman wrote that the ". . . inspector looked at the site and reported there was no undermining and the contractor was in the process of installing a block wall." Further "according to the inspector, the block wall will not be very high . . .... At this time, the landscape block wall is complete, with portions reaching 60-inches in height. The retaining wall is constructed of common garden landscaping blocks. Manufacturers of this type of block recommend structures not exceed 48-inches in height nor be subject to surcharges from sloped banks and or roads. At this time, I am requesting the City provide the following documents to be kept in the records of the affected property owners and homeowners association. I . A copy of the final report to the City from the licensed geotechnical engineer as to the efficacy of the repair to the slope 2. Evidence refuting residents' claims of bank sloughing and undercutting of road edge 3. Evidence that the repair was made under the direction and supervision of a licensed geotechnical engineer 4. A copy of the approved Engineer's plan and City permit for the construction of a block retaining wall exceeding 3-feet in height Sincere Alan H. Muz7 / I / Vice-Presiden ympic View Crest Homeowners' Association cc: William Crowley, Atty. 9 tTREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 Location of Violation (Address/tax account parcel number): 18019 691h Place West, Lot 17 o OlyMpic View Crest, Edmonds, WA 98026, Tax Account Parcel No. 009064000017000. Issued To:- Westar Development, Larry Seitz, Property Owner 1h Address of Person This Order Is Issued To:—Westar Development Company, Inc. 16927 84 NE , Kenmore, WA 98028 Code Section Violated:. Uniforin Building Code (1997 edition) Appendix Chapter 33 Section 3307, Edmonds Community Development Code ChLapter 18.30.050 Description of Violation: 1) North side of property over excavated, cut slopes in excess of a 2: 1 H/V, and 2) Excavation and exposed soils have created sloughing and undermining of a shared access driveway, geotechnical field inspections and reports required on corrections and completion Corrective Action Required: Enlist the services of a licensed geotechnical engineer to perfonn a detailed site investigation and submit reports that address teMporary and pennanent -erosion control measures, necessM slope protection and slope mitigation measures,_ temp orary or permanent juading and/or shoring improvements for all portions of the cut that exceed a 2:1 slope, drivewa safeguards and/or limited access, and include provisions for required on site monitoring of the exposed cut slope and condition of driveway. The final geotechnical report must include a statement that all work complies with Appendix Chgpter 33. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm _(time) November 8,2004 If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $1.00.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Date Mailed: November 1, 2004 Date Served Issuing Party Jeanni e L. Grautm Title Building Official U C' TY OF EDMOAS STREET FILE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Location of Violation (Address/tax account parcel number): 18019 69 th Place West, Lot 17 o OlyMpic View Crest, Edmonds, WA 98026, Tax Account Parcel No. 009064000017000. Issued To:—Westar Development, Larry Seitz, Property Owner Address of Person This Order Is Issued To:—Westar Development CoMpany, Inc. 16927 84t' NE, Kenmore, WA 98028 Code Section Violated:. Unifonn Building Code (1997*edition) Appendix Chapter 33 Section 3307 and Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.40.020. Description of Violation: 1) Construction of a block retaining wall aloniz the existiny- driveway without first obtaining a permit (NOTE-, this wall is not shown on the approved plot plan) and, 2) Block retaining wall qppears to support the driveway surcharge —walls sLipporting a surcharge shall be designed by a professional engineer (with supporting calculations) and be reviewed and qpproved by the City's consultants prior to construction and, 3) Installation of the water service line without calling for the required inspection and, 4) Special inspection by geotechnical engineering required. Corrective Action Required: 1) Enlist the services of a licensed professional engineer to design the retaining wall (engineer shall refer to city handout for retaining walls for design criteria) and, 2) Submit a complete permit application to the city for the retaining wall with all Lequired aplication and permit fees including investigation fees for work completed prior to permit issuance and three copies of a stamped retaining wall plan (with supporting structural calculations). Upon receipt of the plans the city will task the review to a city consultant (note, the qpplicant is responsible for peer review costs associated with this review). Once the plans are approved and ready for issuance,31 The owner shall demolish the existing retaining wall and construct the new wall per the approved plans and call for all inspections as noted on the gpproved plans including any rNuired special inspections and, 4) During demolition work of the retaining wall the contractor shall expose the water service line for inspection (note, it is our understanding that the bedding material for the line is not to city standards and shall have to be replaced, also the location of the existing line to the new retaininp, wall is subject to qpproval by the city engineering inspector and work shall be perfortned in conjunction with re -construction of the retaining wall. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm (time) March 15, 2005 If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: March 1, 2005 Date Mailed: March 1, 2005 Date Served Issuing Party Jeannine L. Graf 4�" Title Building Official V V III C. 18 (413 SJJREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 STH AVENUE NORTH * EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engine&ing March 1, 2005 Alan H. Muzzy, Vice President Olympic View Crest Homeowners Association 18017 69fl'Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR RE: Excavation of driveway area at 18019 691h Place West, Westar Development Dear Mr. Muzzy: Thank you for your letter dated February 12, 2005 (received by the City on February 23, 2005) regarding the subject driveway. Upon receipt of your letter, City representatives visited the site and confirmed that additional requirements will be placed upon the developer until the City can approve the final construction of the driveway retaining wall. Be assured, all required permits shall be obtained and all required inspections, including required special inspections, shall be performed in order for the City to approve the work. Sincerely, al,K* Jeannine L. Graf Building Official Cc: Duane Bowman, Director Development Services Dave Gebert, PE, City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 C. CITY OF EDMONDS GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering December 17, 2004 Linda Muzzy 18017 69"' PL W Edmonds, WA. 98026 /Le 0/ 9 RE: Excavation in the area of private driveway at �PTI 69' PL W Dear Linda: As we discussed last week in our telephone conversation on the above subject, I had our inspector visit the site to look at the situation and determine if there was any degradation of the driveway due to the adjacent construction. Our inspector looked at the site and reported there was no undermining and the area between the wall and driveway is now partially b.ackfilled and compacted and the contractor was in the process of install'ing a block wall. Although there had been some undermining prior to the wall going in, there was no evidence of problems. The reason the area hasn't been totally backfilled is because they are still working on the wall and the contractor has to relocate one of the water service lines that feeds the house directly to the East of the construction. Based on field observations, the water service will be located between the block wall and the driveway. Before the contractor can backfill the water service line, we must inspect it. According to the inspector, the block wall will not be very high and the contractor will be required to backfill behind the block wall at a 2:1 slope (2' horizontal for every foot vertical). If there is settlement in the driveway as a result of the construction, the contractor will be required to fix the problem prior to our sign off of the permit Please note that should settlement occur after we sign off on the building permit, the issue will be between you and the contractor and or homeowner to resolve. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-771-0220 ext 1324. Sincerely, ," AZ;�� Oe Chrisman Engineering Program Manager Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 IP C- .18()", 0 STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www6edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR Westar Development Company September 21, 2004 Larry J. Seitz 1692784 1h Avenue Northeast Kenmore, Washington 98028 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 691h Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 Dear Mr. Seitz: The City is in receipt of your letter dated September 20, 2004 that details your actions to date on above referenced Lot 17 and your work schedule for the next week and one half Your proposal is to forgo geotechnical evaluation required in the Order to Correct Violation Notice because; you have addressed City concerns in a timely manner; you have not observed any sloughing of the shared driveway; and you will restore the shoulder of the shared driveway so that the slope will not exceed a 2:1 slope such that no additional engineering is needed. The City remains concerned on the issues outlined in my letter dated September 14, 2004 but will allow you to proceed with your plan to form the foundation walls and backfill the driveway shoulder area, provided; that daily monitoring of the site for adequate temporary erosion control measures continues, that any observed driveway sloughing, movement or failure is immediately reported to the City Engineer, and that geotechnical evaluation (to be performed by a state licensed geotechnical engineer) takes place on the compaction of the driveway shoulder area. This required engineering inspection is not an appealable or negotiable decision by the building official and is required due to the fact that the fill will support the driveway surcharge and adequate compaction is critical. The City expects that the foundation walls will be poured by no later than Friday, September 24, 2004 and that the complete backfill of the driveway shoulder area and special geotechnical inspection on compaction shall be completed by no later than September 29, 2004 (with the report to be filed with the City by no later than October 1, 2004). If any of these time lines will be exceeded you are required to inform the City in writing prior to the deadline. Failure to notify the City shall result in the issuance of Notice of Civil Violation whereby fines of $ 100.00 per day shall be assessed. Sincerely, Jeannine L. Building Official Cc: Duane Bowman, Director of Development Services Dave Gebert, City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 0 STREET OLE BU110ING SEP 2 0 2004 Westar Development Company Inc. 16927 84th Ave. N.E. Kenmore, WA. 98028 (425) 487-2757 September 20, 2004 Ms. Jeannine Graf City of Edmonds 121 5h Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: 18019 690PI W / Permit 2004 0741 Dear Jeannine, We have installed the barricades and erosion control measures outlined in your correction notice dated September 15, 2004. ' We have met with you engineering inspectors onsite on the 150' and 16fl, and have made minor field corrections and have received approval for erosion control on the 16". We received approval from the building department on Friday morning the 101, and poured footings that afternoon. We are removing the footing forms today and will deliver wall panels tomorrow the 2 1 " and begin building the walls and anticipate requesting inspection Friday morning the 20 and hope to pour them that afternoon. After pouring walls we will need a few days to remove the forms and waterproof the walls. I anticipate beginning backfill on about the 29h of September. I believe we have addressed the City's concerns in a timely manner and will be restoring the shoulder of the adjoining driveway so that the slope will not exceed a 2:1 slope. It does not appear that there has been any sluffing of the driveway in question. Furthermore the backfill will be restored in such a manner that I do not see the need for additional engineering. I hope that this will provide you with a schedule as to what we have planned. I want to assure you that we are checking our erosion measures daily and will be diligently pursuing completion and restoration of this site. If you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate to call me. My cell phone number is 206-949-2757. Sincerely, Larry J. Seitz 0 0 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION th Location of Violation (Address/tax account parcel number): 18019 69 Place West , Lot 17 of 01yMpic View Crest, Edmonds, WA 98026, Tax Account Parcel No. 009064000017000. Issued To:—Westar Development, Larry Seitz, Pr0De!jy Owner Address of Person This Order Is Issued To: Westar Development CoLnpany, Inc. 16927 84'h NE, Kenmore, WA 98028 Code Section Violated:. Uniform Building Code (1997 edition) ARpendix Chqpter 33 Section 3307, Edmonds Communijy Develgpment Code Chgpter 18.30.050 Description of Violation: ' 1) North side of propgrjy over excavated, cut slopes in excess of a 2: 1 H/V, 2) Excavation and gLxposed soils have created sloughing and undermining of a shared access drivewU. 3) TeMporM erosion control is not maintained per gpproved plan and not in coMpliance with Best Management practices. Corrective Action Required: 1) Immediately install lighted barricades along the length of the access driveway reducing the width by 6 feet, and 2) Enlist the services of a licensed geotechnical engineer to perfonn a detailed site investigation and submit a plan by Sqptember 20, 2004 that includes temporM and pennanent erosion control measures, necessary slope protection and slope mitigation measures, temporary or permanent grading and/or shoring improvements for all portions of the cut that exceed a 2:1 slope, driveway safeguards and/or limited access, and include provisions for reguired on site monitoring of the exposed cut slope and condition of driveway, and 3) Any work deemed emergency by the geotechnical engineer shall be immediately installed (provided no City gpprovals or discretionary gpprovals are reguired) and, 4) Report all additional slope slougWng or failures or driveway underinining immediately to the City Engineer, and, 5) Any geotechnical work requiring a pennit shall be prepared by licensed professiomls and submitted within 10 business d4ys of the geotechnical report. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm _(time) Immediately shall mean within 24 hours from the date/time of service which is September 15, 2004 at 5:00pm, the report shall be submitted by September 20, 2004 and any aeotechnical work requirin2 plans shall be submitted within 10 business days of the zeotechnical report. If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Date Mailed: September 14, 2004 Date Served Issuing Party Title Building Official 0 STREET FILE c. CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwdedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering September 14, 2004 Westar Development Company, Inc. Mr. Larry Seitz 1692784 th Aevnue NE Kenmore, Washington 98028 VIA FACSIMILE RE: 18019 69th Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 Dear Mr. Seitz: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to inform you that in response to a citizen's complaint on a possible slope failure and dangerous condition to a private driveway located to the north of property you own at 18019 691h Place West, City officials conducted a site inspection on September 13, 2004 and observed over excavation of your building lot exposing a near vertical cut slope on the north side of the property and the sloughing of materials beneath the shared driveway pavement. Accompanying City officials were representatives of Landau Associates, professional geotechnical consultants for the City who prepared a site report based on their observations (copy enclosed). Please note that the primary purpose of the geotechnical site investigation was to determine if the cut slope and sloughing created an impact to the adjacent driveway. As stated in the Landau Associates report, it is their opinion that the excavation on your lot exceeds a 2:11-1/V slope is overly steep, and threatens the northerly shared driveway. Landau's recommendations include that vehicle traffic should be limited from access on the southerly 6 feet of this shared driveway. As the owner of the lot under construction and responsible party for this excavation, you are responsible for slope protection and associated mitigation and/or safeguards in this matter. Pursuant to Uniform Building Code Section 3307, entitled Excavation and Grading, as Building Official for the City of Edmonds, I shall require the following: Immediately install lighted bamicades along the length of the access driveway reducing the width by six feet. The barricades are to remain in place pending the outcome of your geotechnical report (explained in detail below). If the report Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 0 . * Mr. Seitz September 14, 2004 Page Two recommends removal of barricades, concurrence by the City Engineer shall be required. • Immediately enlist the services of a State licensed Geotechnical Engineer to perform a detailed site investigation and submit a plan to the City by September 20, 2004 that includes; temporary and permanent erosion control measures, necessary slope protection and slope mitigation measures, temporary or permanent grading and/or shoring improvements for all portions of the cut that exceed a 2:1 slope, driveway safeguards and/or limited access, and provisions for required on site monitoring of the exposed cut slope and driveway condition, as applicable. • Any work deemed "emergency" by the geotechnical engineer in the report, shall be immediately installed (provided no City permits,or discretionary approvals are required). Any geotechnical work requiring a permit shall be prepared by licensed professionals and submitted within 10 business days of the geotechnical report. The City shall expedite any required permit approvals in this matter to the extent permissible. • Any changes to the amount or expansion of sloughing under or near the shared driveway shall be immediately reported to the City Engineer. In order to be assured that barricades are immediately installed and a plan is provided by the established deadline of September 20, 2004, attached is an Order to Correct Violation Notice, the first step in the City's Civil Penalties process whereby fines may be imposed in order to gain code compliance. Note, immediate shall mean within 24 hours and all actions deemed immediate are subject to potential fines if the 24 hour notice is not met. The requirements of the Building Official as noted in this letter are appealable within 14 calendar days to the City Hearing Examiner by filing a formal written appeal and filing fee of $230.00 pursuant to ECDC 20.105.010A. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 42 ' 5-771-0220. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance to be sure that I am available to assist you as I am frequently assisting other citizens. Sincerely, &,�//7 Jeannine L. Graf Building Official, C.B.O. Cc: Duane Bowman, Director Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer 01 ?.5 7 7 8 6 10 3 4PIANDAU ASSENTES IF U/13/01 ]�:58 [.V)V003 Lk�MAU ASSOCMnS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Gebert, City Engineer City of Edmonds, Washington FROM Dennis Stettlet, P.E. DATE: September 13,2004 RE: EXCAVATION AT 18019 69TE PLACE W. EDMONDS, WASK(NGTON Dear Mr. Gebert: At your request, Dennis Stettler of Landau Associates and Dave Gebert of the City of Edmonds observed an excavation fb� a filtire residence at 18019 69h Place W. on the aftemoon of September 13, 2004. The purpose of the visit was to assess potential excavation slope stability concerns that could impact the adjacent driveway. OBSERVATIONS i The excavation conditions were observed from the private driveways bounding the property on the north and south sides. We did not enter the excavation. At -the time of our visit no construction work was being conducted and �it was rainJng- Rain had been falling intermittently overnight and during the daylight hours preceding our site visit. A temporary, moveable wood fence was present along the south side of the north driveway. The driveway is about 15 ft wide and asphalt paved. 'Me excavation for the basement of the proposed residence extended down into what appeared to be gray, glacially -consolidated soil. Brown soil that appeared to be topsoil was present between the gray sod and remnants of a sod line that wm visible around portions of the excavation. Fill appears to be present in some areas, in particular the upper portions of ffie north side of the =cavation appear to be fill. The north side of the excavation is near -vertical for the lower approximately 4 to 5 ft, steeply sloping above the near -vertical slope, then near -vertical again for the upper portion of the slope. The top of the excavation on the north side comes up to the edge of the pavernent for the driveway that services residences north and east;of the subject excavation. The soil exposed in the. upper portion of the slope beneath the pavement appears to be angular quarry spall material that is sloughing into the excavation. During the brief time of our site visit, portions of the quarry spall material and a small segment of the near -vertical excavation in the gray soil near the base of the slope were observed to slough into the excavation. 130 2nd Avenue South EdmOnd3, WA 98020 e (426) 77"07 - fax (425) 778-6409 * wwwlandauinc.00rn 212 51 ? 7 8. 6-10 A88 rlm� H/13/04 16 : j � P 0 3 / 0 1) 3 A plastic waterline was observed in the base of the excavation near the north side and the sides of the excavation on the cast and wast sides. We understand that this waterline services the residence to the east and the line was broken during excavation for the basement and bas been temporarily repaired. Portions of the waterline are suspended in air as the pipeline traverses betweim the excavation sides and the bottom of the excavation ExcAvAmN STABlury The excavation contdris near-verdeat portions and the overall slope inclination appears to be significantly steeper than a 2H: IV (horizontal : vertical) slope. In our opinion, the excavation is overly steep and threatens the adjacent drivft2y to the north. Sloughing and failure of material into the excavation could be expected to continue and could undenniine the south portion of the driveway on the north side of the excavation. This could present a hazard to vehicles traversing the driveway. In our opinion, the present si on presents a danger to any vehicle traversing the south side of the 15 ft -Ovide driveway. At this time, we reconunend that 1he temporary fence or other temporary barricades be moved so that vehicle traffic is pirevented from access to at least the southerly 6 ft width of the driveway. It will also be important that the driveway be monitored for signs of cracidng or settlement that could be war=g signs of movement that could fturther endanger the stability of the thiveway. If such signs are observed, it may be appropriate to prevent all vehicle traffic on the driveway taitil the adjacent excavation is backfilled or otherwise-staWlized by shoring. Worker safety in and around the excavation is the responsibility of the contractor. Howevc,-, we note that the excavation is steeper than that prescribed by WISHA, and according to WISHA excavation requirements (WAC 296455), should either be flattened or temporary shorirql, provided. I WATERLM STABiLrry , The waterline has bwn tetuporarily repaired, but is presently expo.ied and partially suspended near the base of the ex cavation. Should sloughing of the excavation side slopes or movernent of construietion equipment damage and break the waterline, the release of water could potentially result in erosion of the slopes at: the base of the excavation and furd= reduce tho stability of the temporary excavation. It would be prMent to protect and relocate this waterline as soon as it is practicable. We appreciate Us opportunity to be of service to you on this assipinent- Please call if you have any questions of if we I be of Ruther assistance. may —I— — .-- 1) 1 munal I 0 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Location of Violation (Address/tax account parcel number): 18019 69,h Place West, Lot 17 of 013mpi View Crest, Edmonds, WA 98026, Tax Account Parcel No. 009064000017000. Issued To:-Westar Development, Lagy Seitz, Propelly Owner Address of Person This Order Is Issued To: Westar Development Company, Inc. 16927 84dNE, Kenmore, WA 98028 Code Section Violated:. Uniform Building Code (1997 edition) Appendix Chapter 33 Section 3307, Edmonds Communfty D �Ioment Code Chapter 18.30.050 Description of Violation: 1) North side of property over excavated, cut slopes in excess of a 2: lH/V, 2) Excavation and exposed soils have created sloughing and undermining of a shared access driveway, 3) Tempora!y erosion control is not maintained per approved plan and not in compliance with Best Management practices. Corrective Action Required: 1) Immediately install lighted barricades along the length of the access driveway reducing the width by 6 feet, and 2) Enlist the services of a licensed geotechnical engineer to perforin a detailed site investigation and submit a plan by September 20, 2004 that includes temporary and permanent erosion control measures, necessM slope protection and slope mitigation measures, temporary or permanent juading and/or shoring improvements for all portions of the cut that exceed a 2:1 slope, driveway safeguards and/or limited access, and include provisions for required on site monitoring of the exposed cut slope and condition of driveway, and 3) Any work deemed emergency by the geotechnical engineer shall be immediately installed (provided no City approvals or discretionary gpprovals are required) and, 4) Report all additional slope sloughing or failures or driveway undennining immediately to the City Engineer, and, 5) Any geotechnical work requiring a permit shall be prepared by licensed professionals and submitted within 10 business days of the geotechnical report. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm _(time) Immediately shall mean within 24 hours from the date/time of service which is September 15, 2004 at 5:00pm, the report shall be submitted by September 20, 2004 and any geotechnical work requiring plans shall be submitted within 10 business days of the geotechnical report. If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Date Mailed: September 14, 2004 Date Served Issuing Party Jeannine L. Graf 4AW�Y� — Title —Building Official From: Ran Trickett 425-775-2687 To� Duane Bowman Date: 911312004 Time: 9:23:56 AM Page 2 of 3 September 13,.2004 Mr. Duane Bow -man Director of Development Services 121 5'h Ave. N. VA A im aqnm 18025 6 Pl. W Edmonds, WA 98026 F , , G� b STREET FILE 106 01q 0 Re: Construction of Westar Development Lot 17 - 69 th A W. Edmonds .'AA Dear Mr. Bowman, The Estates at Olympic View Crest Homeowners Association wishes to "press several concerns regarding the construction of lot 17. There appears to be several issues that are not in compliance with erosion control measures and safety standards. The private road has been undermined due to a 10 — 12 foot deep cut along the edge of it. There appears to be a loss of the road base. The ply wood safety barrier that was constructed was.ineffective in that it blew into the lot sometime during the night of September I &- Larry Seitz was notified the following day, via fax, that this had occurred. So far, there has been no effort to rectify the problem. The Association is concerned about the long term stability of the road. We request that corrective measures be implemented to restore the integrity of the road base. We also request that a maintenance bond naming the homeowners association as additional insured be posted by Westar Development for any future maintenance or repair of the road, should additional settlement or deterioration of the private road occur along the edge of property line. Another area of concern is the exposed soil. There appears to be a lack of proper erosion control in these areas. Finally, the existing water line that serves the lower lot 18 has already been damaged during the excavation, leaving the homeowner with soil in the water and a risk of contamination. The locate wires have been broken and the line is lying on the ground resulting in the potential for additional damage during subsequent construction activities. The water line must be adequately supported to preyent any future damage and needs to be subsequently backfilled with sand or pea gravel during the backfill process to prevent any future damage to this service. Also, the locate wires, need to be repaired along the length of this water line. It appears as if ....... *...0 ............... From: Ron Trickett 425-775-2687 To: Duane Bowman bate: 9'11312'0'04 Time: 9-23:56 AM Page 3 of 3 Septemher 13, 2004 Page 2 the water line has already been patched in with a new section. We are curious as to If this work meets the City of Edmonds standards. The Association is asking that you enforce the proper erosion control measure, construction requirements and safety standards during the construction of this lot and not to allow work that creates a hazard to the community and or exposes the community to future liability and replacement costs for the private road - Sincerely, Ron Trickett President Cc -Al Muzzy, Vice -President 1p C. 18,9 13 9 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwxi.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering September 14, 2004 Mr. Alan Muzzy 18017 69th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 69fl'Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 Dear Mr. Muzzy: ",est 6. GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to inform you that in response to a citizen's complaint on a possible slope failure and dangerous condition to a private driveway located to the north of Lot 17 at 18019 69th Place West, City officials and City Geotechnical consultants conducted a site inspection on September 13, 2004 and observed over excavation of the building lot in question exposing a near vertical cut slope on the north side of the property and the sloughing of materials beneath the shared driveway pavement. Please note that the primary purpose of the investigation was to determine if the cut slope and material sloughing created an impact to the adjacent driveway. Please refer to the attached Landau Associates technical memorandum discussing this matter. It is the opinion of the City's geotechnical engineer that the excavation is overly steep, threatens the adjacent shared driveway and that vehicle traffic should immediately be limited from access on the southerly 6 feet of the driveway pending a geotechnical evaluation by the developer's geotechnical engineer. Therefore, pursuant to Uniform Building Code Section 3307, entitled Excavation and Grading, as Building Official for the City, I have officially ordered the developer (Westar Development Company, Inc) that the southerly 6 feet of the access driveway shall be immediately barricaded from vehicle use and access pending further geotechnical investigation. Furthermore, as a joint property owner of the access driveway you are ordered not to use this portion of driveway as it may be susceptible to further failure until repaired under the direction and supervision of the property owner's licensed geotechnical engineer. The City understands that reducing the width of the driveway is a temporary inconvenience however, the City must take prudent action to safeguard public safety. The requirements of the Building Official as noted in this letter are appealable within 14 calendar days to the City Hearing Examiner by filing a formal written appeal and filing fee of $230.00 pursuant to ECDC 20.105.0 1 OA. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance to be sure that I am available to assist you as I am frequently assisting other citizens. Sincerely Jeannine L. Gra Building Official, C.B.O. Cc: Duane Bowman, Director Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 44 C. 1 SW3 0 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH * EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: wwwdedmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering September 14, 2004 Mr. Gary Ramm. 18015 69h Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 69h Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 Dear Mr. Ramm: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to inform you that in response to a citizen's complaint on a possible slope failure and dangerous condition to a private driveway located to the north of Lot 17 at 18019 69h Place West, City officials and City Geotechnical consultants conducted a site inspection on September 13, 2004 and observed over excavation of the building lot in question exposing a near vertical cut slope on the north side of the property and the sloughing of materials beneath the shared driveway pavement. Please note that the primary purpose of the investigation was to determine if the cut slope and material sloughing created an impact to the adjacent driveway. Please refer to the attached Landau Associates technical memorandum discussing this matter. It is the opinion of the City's geotechnical engineer that the excavation is overly steep, threatens the adjacent shared driveway and that vehicle traffic should immediately be limited from access on the southerly 6 feet of the driveway pending a geotechnical evaluation by the developer's geotechnical engineer. Therefore, pursuant to Uniform Building Code Section 3307, entitled Excavation and Grading, as Building Official for the City, I have officially ordered the developer (Westar Development Company, Inc) that the southerly 6 feet of the access driveway shall be immediately barricaded from vehicle use and access pending further geotechnical investigation. Furthermore, As a joint property owner of the access driveway you are ordered not to use this portion of driveway as it may be susceptible to further failure until repaired under the direction and supervision of the property owner's licensed geotechnical engineer. The City understands that reducing the width of the driveway is a temporary inconvenience however, the City must take prudent action to safeguard public safety. The requirements of the Building Official as noted in this letter are appealable within 14 calendar days to the City Hearing Examiner by filing a formal written appeal and filing fee of $230.00 pursuant to ECDC 20.105.0 1 OA. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 425-771-0220. If you wish to meet in person please call in advance to be sure that I am available to assist you as I am frequently assisting other citizens. Sincerely, J�eannine - TL.a Building Official, C.B.O. Cc: Duane Bowman, Director Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan. JaDan /� C. 18,),3 0 - 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 Website: www.d.edmondsma.us DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning - Building - Engineering September 14, 2004 Mr. Padmaja Vrudhula 18021 69th Place West Edmonds, Washington 98026 RE: Lot 17 @ 18019 691h Place West, Building Permit #2004-0741 Dear Mr. Vrudhula: GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR The purpose of this letter is to inform you that in response to a citizen's complaint on a possible slope failure and dangerous condition to a private driveway located to the north of Lot 17 at 18019 69th Place West, City officials and City Geotechnical consultants conducted a site inspection on September 13, 2004 and observed over excavation of the building lot in question exposing a near vertical cut slope on the north side of the property and the sloughing of materials beneath the shared driveway pavement. Please note that the primary purpose of the investigation was to determine if the cut slope and material sloughing created an impact to the adjacent driveway. Please refer to the attached Landau Associates technical memorandum discussing this matter. It is the opinion of the City's geotechnical engineer that the excavation is overly steep, threatens the adjacent shared driveway and that vehicle traffic should immediately be limited from access on the southerly 6 feet of the driveway pending a geotechnical evaluation by the developer's geotechnical engineer. Therefore, pursuant to Uniform 'Building Code Section 3307, entitled Excavation and Grading, as Building Official forthe City, I have officially ordered the developer (Westar Development Company, Inc) that the southerly 6 feet of the access driveway shall be immediately barricaded from vehicle use and access pending further geotechnical investigation. Furthermore, as a joint property owner of the access driveway you are ordered not to use this portion of driveway as it may be susceptible to further failure until . repaired under the direction and supervision of the property owner's licensed geotechnical engineer. The City understands that reducing the width of the drive ' way is a temporary inconvenience however, the City must take prudent action to safeguard public safety. The requirements of the Building Official as noted in this letter are appealable within 14 calendar days to the City Hearing Examiner by filing a formal written appeal and filing fee of $230.00 pursuant to ECDC 20.105.010A. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 425-77.1 -0220� If you wish to meet in person please call in advance to be sure that I am available to assist you as I am frequently assisting other citizens. Sincerely, Jeannine L. 6k-' Building Official, C.B.O. Cc: Duane Bowman, Director Development Services Dave Gebert, P.E., City Engineer Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister Citv - Hekinan. Janan LIU & ASSOCIATES9 INC. Geotechnical Engineering Mr. Larry Seitz Westar Development Company, Inc. 16927-84 h Avenue NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Dear Mr. Seitz: Engineering Geology March 2, 2005 Subject: Stability of Keystone Block Walls Single -Family Residence 18019 — 69'h Place West Edmonds, Washington Earth Science 0 4 2005 PERMIT COUNTER At your request, we have inspected and evaluated the stability of the Keytone block walls constructed on the subject residence site. Presented in this letter report are our findings and conclusions. A curving Keystone segment concrete block wall (hereinafter referred to as Wall 1) is constructed to line a toe cut along the north and west lot lines, and a straight wall (hereinafter referred to as Wall 2) line the south lot line of the subject residence. Wall 2 is a single. -tier wall lining the south side of the driveway and garage of the subject residence, and stands at about 4 feet tall. About the middle half of Wall I splits into two tiers, with the lower tier wall stands up to 3 feet 4 inches tall and the upper tier up to 2 feet 8 inches tall, and the upper tier wall is set back at 2.0 feet from the lower tier wall. Wall I is within about 15 to 20 feet of the sidewalk to the west and within about 4 feet of the neighb6r's driveway to the north at its closest point. The area between Wall I and the sidewalk is now covered with grass sod and shredded bark, and the area between Wall I and the neighbor's driveway is mostly bare. We understand that the stability of Wall I is the main concern, and hence the subject of our stability evaluation. 19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Phone (425) 483-9134 Fax (425) 486-2746 March 2, 2005 Mr. Larry Seitz/Westar Development Page 2 Two typical sections of Wall I are shown on Plate 1, attached hereto. You stated that a perforated PVC drain pipe is installed along the base in front of the lower tier wall, and that crushed rock filled trenches are constructed under the base -course of the lower -tier block wall at 3 to 4 points to hydraulically connect the sand backfill to the drain pipe in front of the wall. The drain pipe is then tight.lined to the drain line of the roof drain system. You also informed us that free -draining sand is used to backfill the block walls, and that the sand backfill is placed in lifts no more than 12 inches thick with each. lift compacted with a vibratory plate compactor to a non-. yielding state. It is our opinion that the block walls constructed as you described should have adequate drainage control provision. As presented on our 10/29/04 letter, the original surficial soil unit at the residence site and its vicinity is mapped. as advance outwash deposits of dense to very -dense, slightly silty, fine to medium sand with a trace to some gravel. The native undisturbed advance outwash soils are quite stable. We understand the roadbed of the neighbor's driveway to the north is constructed with structural fill placed over the advance outwash deposit. The structural fill was compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor method), monitored and certified by Nelson-Couvrette Associates. It is our opinion that cut slopes or fill embankments at 2H:IV in -such struciural fill materia for in the compacted sand backfill of the block walls should be able to maintain stability. The.surficial soils on the slope next to the north neighbor's driveway may have been disturbed by construction traffic. The disturbed soils should be compacted with a vibratory plate compactor to a non -yielding state, and the slope should be seeded and covered with a layer of straw mulch. Shrubs may also be planted on the slope to provide erosion protection. With multi -tier walls, the general rule of thumb is that the upper -tier wall should be set back from the lower -tier wall a horizontal distance at least equal to the height of the lower -tier wall in LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. N i March 2 ' 2005 Mr. Larry Seitz/Westar Development Page 3 order not to exert additional surcharge on the lower -tier wall. This is based on the assumption that the pressure envelope of the foundation load of the upper -tier wall spreads downward at a 45-degree angle. In dense native soils or structural fill, the pressure develop may actually be spreading downward at a steeper angle, and thus requires less setback of the upper wall. The Keystone block walls constructed on the subject residence appear to be stable, with no signs of movement, such as tilting, bulging or sliding. The pressure envelope from the upper -tier foundation load does not appear to an adverse impact on the stability of the lower -tier wall of Wall 1. Based on our observation of the conditions of the Keystone walls built on the subject residence site, it is our conclusion that the one -tier portion of the block walls is stable. The two -tiered portion of the walls appears to be stable without any discernable movement, even though the upper -tier is not set back far enough from the lower -tier wall according normal rule of practice. Please call if you have any questions. ,I S. 0 Yours very truly, A LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. 2758 J. S. (Julian) Liu, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Geotechnical Engineer EXPIRES 7/17/Zobt:�- Attach.: Plate I — Typical Sections of Keystone Block Wall LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. 21-0 ry H : IV oe, P L AT1169 6 E-HP. CUT s �'M A-X. Corl PAC-Tav r-9 r_-S_-P KAI r4 1 P4 (I 4 PeRFwKA-reo r V C V KA.1 r4 p I r -ez-r I _0 f4 I SR C,, 9 VJ A, t, L ('?,06K PILL60 I? I*Tc" e 5 I if 3-0 41 A-r 62TC-6--rpr P_H: I q OK P:LA-rTr-,K_.T_ Mr. COM FACTev SAt4o PIL-L� TeM F WT �-,,L,PPE; Lo tsli(q . Op RrH Lo-r L (t� r-_ . O'T's' I p e Li AiK N ele, w bop'� pA1vr'-wA.-f eA\1smaAT FYPICAL SECTIONS - KEYSTONE BLOCK WAI LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 18019 - 69TH PLACE WEST Geotechnical Engineering - Engineering Geology Earth Science EDMONDS, WASHINGTON JOB NO. DATE 3/2/05 1 PLATE 1 efl� 778 M� 0 moo wxlms ]H-� wwol ]�:�8 flgbiq LANDAU FAX COVER SHEET AssocLuEs (Please deliver upon rd ceipt) MIM I -HrA I KwAtARCOA03 To: Dave Gebert Company. Clyt of Edmonds Phone No.: 425-771-0220 Fax No.: 425-672-5750 From: Dennis Stettler Date: SeptembeE 13,2004 Project No.- 074127 No. of Pages (including this sheet): 3 ff yDu do not nweive ali pages, Wephone immeda*4. The information contained within INs fox should be considered confidential and is intended only for the person(s) to whom It Is addressed. Should you receive this tranarniesion In error, please noffy Landau Associates Immediately and destroy the copy received. Message: Dear Dave; Enclosed please fi�d a technical memomndurn related to the excavation at 18019 690'Place W. We appreciate this opporhmity to be of service, Please call if you have any questions or if we may be of fiuther assistance. 11077-T-M 130 2nd Avenue South ei Edmonds, WA 98020 * (425) 77M907 4b fax (425) 778-6409 * www.landa"uinc.com LANDH MOCIVES INC I* 09MM IH� IAU/M LANDAU ASSOCL4TES TECHNICAL M-EMORANDUM M% I GaXCHMM I NOR& TO: Dave Gebcrt, City Engineer City of Edmoids, Washington FROM: Dennis Stettlei, P.E. DATE: September 13� 2004 RE: EXCAVATION AT 18019 697 PLACE W. Fmmoms, WmwNGroN Dear Nft. Gebert: At your request, Dennis SteWer of Landau Associates and Dave Gebert of the City of Edmonds observed an excavation fo ' � a fawre residence at 18019 69' Place W. on the aftemoon of September 13, 2004. The purpose of thp visit was to assess potential excavation slope stability concerns that could impact the adjacent dtive�ay. OBSERVATIONS I The excavation conditions were observed from the private driveways bounding the property on the north and south sides. We did not enter the excavation. At the time of our visit, no construction work was being conducted and lt was raining- Rain had been falling intermittenfly overnight and during the daylight hours preceding our site visit. A temporary, moveable wood fence was present along the south side of the north driveway. The driveway is about 15 ft wide and asphalt paved - The excavation for the basement of the proposed residence extendeddown into what appeared to be gray, glacially-consobdated soil. - Brown soil that appeared to be topsoil was present between the gray soil and remnants of a sod line that w= visible around portions of the excavation. Fill appears to be present in some areas, in Rarticular the upper portions of the north side of the -.xcavation appear to be fill. The north side of the excavation is near -vertical for the lower approximately 4 to 5 ft, steeply sloping above the near -vertical slope, then near -vertical again for the upper portion of the slope. The top of the excavation on the north side comes up to the edge of the pavement for the driveway that services residences north and east! ,of the subject excavation. The soil exposed in the upper portion of the slope beneath the pavement appears to be angular quarry spall material that is sloughing into the excavation. During the brief time of our sitz visit, portions of the quarry spall material and a small segment of the near -vertical excavation in the gray soil near the base of the slope were observed to slough into the excavation. 130 2nd Avenue South Zdmond5, WA 98020 - (426) 778-N07 a fax (425) 77M409 * www.landauine.com 01 5 J 7 8 6 10 9 LANPAU A88 0 1 A T E 8 1 N A plastic waterline was observed in the base of the excavation near thc north side and the sides of the excavation on the castl and west sides. We, understand that this waterline services the residence to the east and the line was br6ken during excavation for the basement and bas been temporarily repaired. Portions of the waterlm'e am suspended in air as the pipeline traverses betweim the excavation sides and I the bottom of the excavation. EXCAVATION STABLILM The excavation contains near -vertical portions and the overall slope inclination appears to be Significantly steeper than A 2H: 1V (hod=tal : vertical) slope. In our opinion, the excavation is overly steep and threatens the adjacent driveway to the north. Sloughing and failure of material into the excavation could be expected to continue and could undermirie the south portion of the driveway on the north side of the excavation. This could present a hazard to vehicles traversing the driveway. In our opinion, the present situation presents a danger to any vehicle traversing the south side of the 15 ft wide driveway. At this time, we reconunend that 1he t=Wmry fence or other tern porary barricades be moved so that vehicle traffic is prevented from access to at least the southerly 6 ft width of the chiveway, It will also be important that the driveway be monitored for signs of cracking or settlement that could be warning signs of movement that could Ruther endanger the stability of the 4hiveway. If such signs are observed, it my be appro I priate to prevent all vehicle traffic on the driveway iintil the adjacent excavation is backfilled or otherwise� stabilized by shoring. Worker safety in and around the excavation is the responsibility of the contractor. Howcvc�.,-., we note that the excavation i I s steeper dm that prescribed by WISRA, and according to WISHA excavation requirements (WAC 296 '155), should either be flattened or terMorary shoriq, provided. WATEMM STABiLriy The waterlme has been temporarily repaired, but is presently exposed and partially suspended near the base of the excavation. Should sloughing of the excavation side slopes or movement of construction equipment �arnage and break the waterline, the release of water could potentially resi3lt M'* erosion of the slopes at! the base of the excavation and Airther reduce tho stability of the temporary excavation. It would be prudent to protect and relocate this waterline as soon as it is practicable. I We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this assipment Please call if you have any questions of if we mal y be of further assistance. GBM301 2 LANDAu ASSOCIATES 15r 0015 600+pL 0 Gebert, David From: Bowman, Duane Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:12 AM To: Gebert, David; Graf, Jeannine Subject: FW: Safety Concerns at Lot #17 Olympic View Crest City of ionds.doc (1,005 KE Dave/Jeannine, Take a look at this letter and photographs and let's discuss. Duane ----- original Message ----- From: Family Schwedhelm [mailto:schwedhelmfamily@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 8:35 PM To: bowman@ci.edmonds.wa.us Subject: Safety Concerns at Lot #17 Olympic View Crest Dear Mr. Bowman, Attached is a letter (and photos) expressing our concerns regarding the current state of excavation at Lot #17, Olympic View Crest, Edmonds. In case you cannot open the attachment, please contact me at 425-672-1376. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Denise Schwedhelm Don't just Search. Find! http://search.sympatico.msn.ca/default.aspx The new MSN Search! Check it out! 1 18027 60 Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 September 12, 2004 City of Edmonds Development Services Department 121 5h Ave North Edmonds, WA 980 Re: Olympic View Estates Lot # 17 18019 69h Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 I am writing to express my concern over the state of the above -named lot, particularly with regard to safety I issues. Excavation recently began on this lot; all excavation equipment was removed the afternoon "of Thursday, September 9, 2004. The following are of concern: 1. There are'hu& _Aes of exposed soil wiiiino,plastic coveringtheift (two are partially covered). p This presents an-erosion-gituati6n. 2. Excavation was done extremely close (within inches) to the private road that services three existing homes in the development. A plywood "fence" mounted on pieces of 2 x 4 was placed sitting on the serviceroad(seebelow) on Thursday evening. During the night of Friday, September 10, the "fence" blew over into the hol6,! and -the. area remains without any typeofbarrier. The bott o�nf of tlie-ekaVatibn is" 10 -12 feet below ro"ij �1(-Vea.-- This is 6x ly- u-n- -safe and'p6t6tially o anyone drivi king.nearby, J , - -- _44#gerous� t - "1119,qi especially-inthe�ditk.-Atio,ju—stasirnportani,-thi�r-eise-o-n-c-e—mf6rtliestabilil��6f-�thop'tiVate�,-, ro4a; erosion is occurring, and down into -the excavation.��,- As a member of the homeowner's associati-n of this neighborhood, I do not wish to incur any expense in the future as a result of injuries or damages incurred due to neglect on the part of the builder on this lot. Please be aware of this situation. I am sure the City of Edmonds will take whatever steps deemed necessary to maintain the safety of the existing neighbors and the safe development of this property. Sincerely, Denise Schwedhelm. Ricardo Schwedhelm. Attachment: photos lZ ......... CN: 1I MTN kv, [is toy., I I 0 t'll r___ P Gebert, David From: Bowman, Duane Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:13 AM To: Gebert, David Subject: FW: Water Line and Construction Dave, More ... Duane ----- original Message ----- From: Padmaja Vrudhula (mailto:pvrudhula@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:59 PM To: Bowman@ci.edmonds.wa.us Subject: Water Line and Construction Dear Mr. Bowman, I am contacting you regarding my watersupply at 18021 69th pl 1� Edmonds 98026. A few weeks ago, the developer -who ownd Lot 17'(address is 18019 69th Pl. W), began construction. ' When I came home from an extended business trip this Friday, there was dirt in my water. I ran my faucets for about an hour, and it cleared up somewhat. However, there are still solid particles in the water from all my pipes and faucets. I am concerned that during the course of the digging on Lot 17, they have managed to nick, or otherwise disturb my water line. I would like to see this fixed before they pour the foundation, and bury the damaged water pipe. Could you please advise me on what I can do to remediate this situation? Ron Trickett, my neighbor, and also the builder of my property, recommended that I contact you. You can reach via email, or on my cell at 206-290-8059. Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Padmaja I V 1 rj L) u rj 1r). 41 4i�J404 zil ri e7r> w4- NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTEcHNicAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS ANo ENVIRONMENTAL Sawws Facsimile Transmiffal To: LYL#- MAR '10.2000 Company: ch--? DF- fD,4,04D5 ENGINEEwovs Phone: Fax. (42G�) 721 02z) From: Company: Nelson-Couvrette & Associates, Inc. Phone: 425-486-1669 Fax: 425-481-2510 BUILDING Date: Pages Including Cover Page: NCA File #: cc: Comments: MAR 1 6 2000 U�J/ A. U/ Z-L)UU IQ. 4�) 4LJ4014.J.LQ rHur- U4 NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CoNsuvnm; Geow#4-vicA& ENGINSERS. GEOLOG'SrS FIELD REPORT U LCNV1,q0fVME/VTAL SCIENTISrS 17311-135th Avenue NE, A-500 Project: OLqm?\C, &A) Q�f5r File No. 2�4-199 Woodinville. WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 - (425) 337-1669 Owner: Wt&?(u)[)LJV &)ILILB Date: FaX (425) 481-2510 Location: Report No. Weather: Page: of L4 Purpose of Visit: fcA� M01 TOL1,12N& By: (2 -10 KOLATE Ct4 UA- A4 ON AW-Mht tof AEX t)tlli LILL, LEFI-v�e OF If , U,1666 CVNfA-#S4 J�JJ.L- -T-Hf,- CVQ, L)rF. n�a 'l.'V#- 1JOk-fh F,'06k- ov -111AL lsnT- &IM)6 I "I 'so 5,()fr2LA"-- a I) PY 6- - I Lif PW-L ,OF f"04-C, 'Afit i�rnklktr-Q tf�nt%;- too-'?" -,;-r -,�:O -MenJ60 'T�C Fpo-'K� I-hyale -ra -[hf- -coiL eu� r-oL L-JALOATloJ , -rP&- RLL COJLD U: PILOM I -r,- .2 " g.J)-TH A ,Yz e' blA-01tTE4 frf-C-t- f4)0 JdDl��) A-,,x,&*AT-g- K�-5x.LXE- lt�-?Lg-C Duksr� -1tas Wf-Pf- 7*9/, ViLL ALSP -OWM�-, O-e, -1-PAL -IA\f L-OTS 15- -TijbJ&H 19 RAD BU-43 0)Vt&0 -v 2- FU-T- of - v)C,,f* L-co5f- 16 1 LL ) 0 F" 6Q O.S -MA*r �kd - QIJA L. f- t LL- �i AD Af ?J P!,A.CfP 0 LUTS 10 At� D 9 - 91 L-L- I-IMMMD '4i*T OF -vo of: 00� )+Ap U.1�0 R-ACF-b i�3 A -Tf�6444-�-� f-640 T -M�T OP 1-b Ig.' oF 0&) - 59OCTUOL 0; 911-L- e MAR L4f EVAUMTE-D FiL'L co LDT-S 10 IS A�D Zo. V-X A-M41 101" A UaE IfifoLtO Tiff- Lvo,4-e -MfSo)L- -M UPO-sf- -,�,A zz*i fA-e -ILL 2L WT f n-L c-o UL-o Bf� p(pif I -rc 4 q> IV 'i -�SP lt� Loy AT& 23 "PUS4- tid-kl;r�r A KE-d U)L d,%eva D�4-156 -M LOY 'De�.rz dArv& Son. 10,3 PMAOLES 0 24S )2 Attachments: Signed: Distribution: 03/10/2000 10: 45 4254812510 NtL�zUN-UUUVKt11t NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOrECHNICAL ENCINEERS. CEOLOGISTS ANO ENVIPONMENTAL SCIENfISTS 17311 - i 35th Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 - (A25) 337-1669 Fax (42S) 481-2510 Project Owner: Location: Weather: Purpose of Visit: FIELD REPORT FileNo. 2-&H19. - Date: 3/21,00 Report No - 14 Page- 2- of By: AID k, 1) ry mk6n oF So,11t sr 6w c q g4 otx- A t) D t-&r 1:1 w- M ET, oL OP Iff- AST/4 D--Iqr,2 m,+jqAJA r471 P-Et�2� ' Fo f, T)tr— cr;.9j Jf,3 0L)f— Of 11310A THE Of,& 140t- QJ-L% Lpr COitf-AcTflQ '12 .ZrT4 JJfE OF 11W— AW--PS �pm�,p npl LOTS 10 - Ak� 19, \,Jf- I'D PAU)A-M "f, &fO54D 6L)jL,�tic, Aff-. 0Xr-LAIED . Attachments: Distribution: NaswCowRmE & AssoctoEs, Wc. IN-PLA CE MOISTURE AND DENSITY TESTS C"AnwGeomoosoiL PamM Gmo= PROJECT NAME: OLINFIC. V=lf, CPIF-ST- JOB NUMBER: 2 (o,41 9 cl LOCATION: EDMO14DS REPORT NO.: i [PAGE OF PROCTOR METHOD: D - 698-91 ASTM D - 1557-91 TESTS CONDUCTED BY: APK, TEST DATE NO, —.ASTM APPROX.�APPROX. GENERAL FEETTO LOCATION GRADE FILL DEPTH % MOIST WET DRY MAX % DENSITYl DENSITY DENSITY COMP-1 % SPEC ;;] COMMENTS BLOWS F-P-ASS OR FAIL -*110C C, 7 -5-ft-517f- f144 2 42 12.7 1-3*7 121 qS- pau'e 1 2,5 — cq 2 ��-o 17-12 ItZ, 121 97 c�S; c 9 .2 0 1 Z 1 99 95- fg*$ -.2 c 10 2- t+ 19+ 1-32 (3� 95 9 5 -2 1,37 2- Ql-3 133-61 11910 96 gs z 15- ll'o 11 16 Hc, t 5 1.21 9 ?fxy.�, 1-2" p 7 Oak 10,t, 1 S� )24,3 t'Z I �9 1.22(, 7 Lc W� 6# SECTION I TO R. svi xe W/ A7r urr. J90 ex. srR 0 566 -A ;c—. ML 9w, (6) 140 J;18 ex MR iex sm 6926 3.ro ::5b -%54 JSD ua PEASE 041�\%V- 50)1-s %Jir*W z ft ULU&) 5JOAgr-, cn kb r-.,5 C= C=� uAtEtr c 14 VSHIP 2 7 1 1 1 F I ri p cs RTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMEI�('s (3 cs Q e4 0.20 Dljr CAL a L) FLrr*)V. V kl� JIL I I OL-Ymf(c- Vlw c9F57- 'PA&L 4 oF ir m r u c c c c mlll� imm�v p rl V c L 370 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS A MAILING ADDRESS I �am CITY ZIP ]TELEPHONE A &Pk, 1 _;7 jC__ NAME2�� ADDRESS XIP"TELEPHONE 144 v i LLA m6w&j, +z%-�) .4-e-7 -z;j NAME I ',,�-'IPERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT ZONE E,5:5 NUMBER JOB ADDRESS MON (4�9 '0' FL., LA.) SUMAPT# PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. !qL_yOtp f , F p7el Z+ 17 ILA Ew LID FEE $ PUBLIC Rl::Z PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP I ESCP Approved RW Pem* Required EXISTING PROPOSED Street Use Pernift Req�d triapecdon Required Sidewalk Required REQUIRED DEDICATION— Fr Undewotew wiring required METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUI RED' YES E3 NO 13 T 3 REMARKS z z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE digAftiieArs-r, i - A. M-0,01f — 1 AL�ri ..FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE CITY 577, STATE LICENSE N UMB CHECKED BY OR CU 'SHORELINE ORADB# INSPECTION REO'D PSOND OSTED ED vtt .0 - WES [3 NO J SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNVPARCEL'NO. COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED POSED PRO c0c) EXP Z5' 33- 75' J;fNEW Ej�<ESI . DENTIA I L J9 :PLUMBING/ MECH LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.).'I-PA'OPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRQNL..fiWfi__REAR FRONT-. LIR SIDE REAR 0 ADDITION E] COMMERCIAL 0 COMPLIANCE OR 'A77,5_ z CHANGE OF USE REMODEL [3. APARTMENT 0 SIGN PARKING REQ-0 PROVIDED LOT AREA XP.:NING IEWED BY DATE 2- 5 V 7-A REPAIR GR4AI? CYDS FENCE .317o,3 10 X Fr) REMARKS 1:1 OLISH TANK PTH ER IVA VD 72. C a GARAGE ARPORT RETOUNING WALL 11ROCKERY :RENEWAL [3 C (TYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIV" EXPLAIN: 511A147_z 01- V CHECKED BY TYP�� CTION rcon OCCUPANT 17r7 GROUP NUMBgB AMO&IDWELLING NUMBER OF I CRITICAL AREAS SPECIAL R To OCCUPANT UNITS NUMBER JAREA REQU':nCYES LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMA %11 ,:'A 1 , PROJSIINSPECJIONS PER'UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REO'D h M. A&.4ell E*0097,v 4 .1 t_ V UFAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE A 9 _Z PLAN CHECK NO VESTED DATE Tkr",' 'Plumb"' aig Mechanical THISP -IT IM -nRrmr ONLY THE WORK NOTED. TVHIERMIT COVERS TO \RK a It E DOME ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX ANY CON CTION ON THE PU C 2 Grading DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRWMAYS, MARIO ETC.) WILL REQUI 3 3 alll SEPARATE PERMISSION. f Engr. Review PERMIT APPLICATION:* I IL PERMIT LIMI'll I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK 118 Ir 180 DAYS Wr 'W IT * Engr.Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR I )R 0 M4 FOWUJON -APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, GNS AND SUCC ORB I C Traffic Mitigation IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY: DEFEND AND HO ARMLESS THE OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AN ENTS FROM AND '4 Fire Review ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER MATURE, ARISING ORI TLY Y I ECTLY REC R/EIC FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMrr. ISSUANCE OF THIS RMIT SHA NOT BE i OT 9 DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREME!NT Fire Inspection OF CITY DINAN E C 0 0 . OV SC ,I NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CRYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY OR CE OVISION.* Landscapainsp. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT FORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LAAR CODE OF THE STATE 00 WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTIl WORKMEN'S CqMPEN?Ayr0f INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. SIGNATURE J16WNER E 7- bL6L NY DATE GNE IAO 0 Z--- 1425) 11111111 771-0220 A N PUN M 1333 IT I L -AVIT'0�)OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CER'TIFI- CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 FAX 10101 FEE Recording Fee City Surcharge State Surcharge Plan Chk Deposit Receipt # Total Amount Due Receipt # APPLICATION APPROVAL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Offlclal or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt Is acknowledged in space provided. FFICIALI-SIGNATURE DATE DATE ORIGINAL - FILE YELL.OW - INSPECTOR PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR RECEIVED J56"' I PERIMIT EXPIRES CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS I A e7 n — , P----4 A lr--�v% I 111-In _171 C4�5 Lr%,� MAILING ADDRESS I . _0:� I Laia k) CITY ZIP TELEPHONE )4!:�CN0,A0j'jF,. .?X)& q40j 72� NAME ;: ADDRESS E U CITY ZIP ITELEPHONE NAME (A a-fi F--V'N1ykCWLT, tA1 a: STATE LICENSE NUMBER W 6 -S—(A— t7 C 0 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. 7 TELEPHONE zoo 6(441 V75 7 EXPIRATION DATE I J�CHECKED BY ZINEW IR RESIDENTIAL ADDITION COMMERCIAL REMODEL MULTIFAMILY rl REPAIR C YDS [D DEMOLISH TANK siGARAGE RETAINING WALL CARPORT ROCKIfRY CrYPE OF USE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: 59 PLUMBING / MECH 13 COMPLIANCE OR CHANGE OF USE 1:1 SIGN DFENCE ( X-� FT) OTHER F RE SPRINKLER FIRE ALARM USE PERMIT tj ZONE NUMBER �coq_o a JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS tCt)o F>L PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO, ct=IC_ Pv,-7-2_.._ 1-7 LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP APPrOved RW pamit Required Street Use Permit Req'd EXISTING PROPOSED - inspection Required REQUIRED DE61CATION FT Sidewalk Required Underground wiring required METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OFfIX9RES P . RV REQUIRED NO E3 YES)< REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACT09 RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE TIT�INEERING REVIEWED BY !?AjrE FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE P-95-12- cu �'SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION REYDf POSTED 1$ BOND 0 VO --YES SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED _V.— HEIGHT 7ALLOWED ,, PROPR� I X\ 3.�0 EXP I LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOS )7 REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) FRON;, SIDE REAR f PROPOSED SETBACKS FRO NT- UFYSIDE, 35; -Xv 0 a5 7 0 PARKING LOT AREA PIQNING RE DATE REO'D I PRIDED (goo 3, -,., I . 94�_� - REMARKS-* 'mcteoe 33,iA,5 /t,)rrf P_ of I qv - 71L CHECKED BY ITYPE Ok0_NSTIiilUCTION I Cpyfl I 22�ANT W_o 1 W z 1 W I cc 11: 01 z 0 M NUMBER OF rA4UNITS NUMBFEVOF DWELCIkG CRITICAL AREAS I Qj9C) 14+ SPECIAL INSPECTI O—N] REQUIRED �_REFA JOCCUPANT' LOAD 01 STORIES 0**e" NUMBER [] YES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS z PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 1081IBC1091IRC109 FINAL INSPECTION REO'D c4f Awa W. Jim I VALUATION 1 Dwription FEE Description FEE Plan Check State Surcharge 4. 5� :�'j U 8 Ll I HqAT SOURCE O'G IN OT SLOPE % &—ACI Building Permit In f —)Z City I Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO- VES ED DfE POr A (1 IN.:. I Plumbing 200 Base �ee —70 74" Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS, PE MIT COVERS WORK TO It E DOME ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC Grading 2 :OMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE 3 SEPARATE PERMISSION. I= Engr. Review PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS IL PERMIT UMM I YEAR -'PROVIDED WORK IS S�TARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS Engr. Inspection I - SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Plan Chk. Deposit fA 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESOR S Fire Review IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND- AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # cc ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY I PERMIT SHALL NOT BE r--. FROM,THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMrr. ISSUANCE OF THIS 9 DEEMED TO MODIF� WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscapelnsp. Total Amt. Due 1&5 - 01 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION! Recording Fee Receipt 0 VIA� z 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE,R . EAD THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT. AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE.OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLYWITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR,CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged In space provided. WORKMEN'S CphilPEN NCE AND RCW:18.27. ,�ATI?N INSURA TE OFFICII SIGN URE VA r- SIGNAT RE (C DATE SIGNED R (425) :M. _ 6o - 2-5.— 0 4 771-0220 - (REL S PY DATE E IqN EXT 1333 ITISU LAWFULTO USE 08 OCCUPYA BUILDING OF3,STRUCTURE UNTILAFINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADEANDAPP'ROVALORACER.TIFICATEOFOCCU- ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW -INSPiCTORI PANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBCj09/IBC1`10/lRC1 1 0. PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR , 09/03 PRESS HARD.YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIES A POWION OF SECTION 17, TOWNSW 1,. . .-I . I I/ I I I - . ! I 0 I A"'7 T T 17, A, 1,7* -CONC. CULVej?' 34: IN) It 3 7? 09 (5), - SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUC770NI GENERAL TEMPORARY EROWONI SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES. A. THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION. CALL 171-0220 ext. 326 B. WHERE POSSIBLE NATURAL WGETA77ON WILL BE MAINTAINED f'OR SfL F CONTROL C. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND SEASONAL COND17IONS DICTATE, THE EROSION CONTROL FACIL177ES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ANDIOR ALTERED AS REQUIRED By THE CITY ENGINEER To ENSURE CON77NUING EROSIONISEDIMENTATION CONTROL. D. TEMPORARY 9LTA71ON PONDS AND ALL TEMPORARY SILTA77ON CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SA71SFACTORY CONDITION UN77L SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING ANDIOR CONSTRUC7701V 15 COMPLETED. PERMANFNT DRAINAGE FACIL171ES ARE OPERATIONAL, AND THE POTEN77AL FOR ER09ON HAS PASSED. C- ESC MINIMUM REOUIREMENT - SIABILISAITON OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIW77ES SHALL BE STA6LIZED By SUITABLr APPLICATION OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SOD, HYDROSEEDINC; OR 0771ER VEGETAITON, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BAfPs SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED. AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL. 771C EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABLIZED ACCORDING AN APPROVED 77METABLE (TYPICALLY. NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR A40RE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER I THROUGH APRIL 30 AND NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30). F. I'HE PUBLIC RIGHr--Of--WAY SHALL BE KEPT' CLEAN. TRACKING OF MUD AND DEBRIS FROM THE SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. FAILURE To COMPLY KITH THIS COAlDI77ON WILL RESULT IN ALL WORK ON THE SITE BEING STOPPED G. PLACE ROCK CHECK DAMS EVERY 50 FT OF THE REGRADED DITC ,H. 27 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W�LLAMETTE MERIDIAN, SNOHOMISH COUNTY WA. BMCHK4�-< �"367.64' 'Jon W/ 0.25, OLA, 8.455/ WN MEET FILE L \—L 0/w MAY D/w + 0 + 00 u o DRIVrWAY N07E� DRIVEWAYS WILL HAVE A MAX SLOPE OF 147. A 0+00 1+00 2+00 697H PLACE WEST CROSS) SECTION @ STA. 1+65 SCALE: V 1 5, H 1 50' GRAPHIC SCALE 510.-- 2 i 5 i 100 OV FEET I ATH - 50 Fr 1+00 2+00 69TH PLACE WES T CROSS SECTION @ STA. 0+70 SCALE- V 1" H i_;�`56';_ Ll _SOILS TYI�E. �IILOERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM AND ALDERWOOD URBAN LAND COMPLEX. I BEFORE YOU DlGq L .1-800-42"555 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A T S 6 FXffR FABRIC MAYFAAL m coNnww,, FO WRE WRE ME� SLP� r �a FOR 11L I nLM iARMS. -RC WWI �T Fv4CE OR SX T I XM FAMC� FIL MP FAMMC�_ _7FRIA, 194K Q x I :1101tAi AS CV0 -:2It BURY m n A ER I u L_ 2 -8 - fW I I BY 12"5k, ll,� S 1AW 0 �"Zr 2� VANDA ELE VA T70/V SEC77ON SILT fft .�E DETAIL 7 MIN 6E TEMPORARY DITCH DETAIL. N.F.S. 12.4 ACRES BA51N AREA SURFA C,' AREA POND CAL C PER D. 0 E SA (SURFACE AR%, - (1�2) (Q FOR l0rR) / (WLoCfTy aF SETTLING) SA (12) (5 4 / (0.00096 FPS) SA 6.750 SF SETTLING SURFACE REOURM) SA 7.500 SF SFMWG SURFACE PROWDED) I' DEPT14 SEDMENT TRAP rqEL_ ARrA 7..�00 GRVL CDNE 2- 1' DIA. Df WA rERING HOLES I" SD RISER CONE Pf X SETjZJNG _1 2' SEDIWN7 12'So- TEMPORARY �E�rNTATJON p0ND1--j-\ ESTIMATED CUT AND FILL QUANTITIES CUT: 2,000 C.Y. FILL: 15,000 C.Y. NOTIF: THIS IS AN ESTIMATE ONLY. THESE EARTHWORK OUANTITIES ARE NOT TO HE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANYAND ALL -QUANTITIES REPRESENTED IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS. THE aTY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION �e_ cr) C�l C\2 00 Z4 m :3� Z E— uj cc (Ji W U Ze Q) I'( CO Cr.) Z A cr. 0 JOB No. '1908'5 SHEET No. 3 OF 0� 0