18122 84TH AVE W.PDF15383
18122 84TH AVE W
NOTICE:
y.�--Of a.�c�cur�a-cy.:
Nb--wa_rra_n't
The information'shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of �Edm.onds does not . wa rra nt the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s.'-). Any person or entity -requesting a
copy should conduct an Independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
-t-Fe -m a p (s) / including, but not limited to,
th . e loc'ation of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may, not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmo'nds nor its
-,I h e
.,a'-.Ie for
ernpto-yee-s o-r offiCle-rs -shal-1 be 11 [if
i n
information give on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION M/ REPAIRS M LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
980sez
OWNER ................. CONTRACTOR ... RQ15 .... KVC.Ae.l- ........................................ PERMIT NO.9.80504..
JOB ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT,.N0 . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
A
0
NAMEOF ADDITION ..: .....................................................................................................................
I'S 12 2 84`14AWL.W.
234f
23f I&S
4.5'-*F I"Coppea
(o'
17' SPLIC.&
13'1
1St5Z 84-rA [--�* 12.5'
i.-JTICE: NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY.—TImLin1ormation shown an fa
abehed map was corroled for use by the City of MMx%lkJb_9mploy0n
and consultants. The City of Edmonds does not warrant the a&0raq of
anything set forth on the map. Any person or enfity requesting a copy
shol conduct an Independent Inquiry regarding the information shown on
the rnap, including, b4A not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown.
Such sewer stubs may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the
loodon shown. Neither the City ot Edmonds nor its employees or officers
shall be liable fw the information given on this map, nor for any oral
said map.
Q/4" P s.
%M/TP.046r4 W I pr--
irs"t
Approve&-*18132 I 'B4,1, -a/I% 199
'pAq.-rAAL. jqjz2
DATE............................................ By ...... Z� ....... !- W-
12
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 27, 1999
To: Building Permit No,,980882
From: Kate Gallowa
Subject: Legal Nor(-confoqing Garage
There is an existing legal non -conforming garage atUMM�06"TAttached to this
document is verification that the subject garage existed prior to 1979 when S-28-79 was
approved. The subject garage can also be seen on theapproved lot line adjustment document
between Tract A and B at 18112 85'h Avenue W.
The existing garage is a legal non -conforming building in conformance with the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17.40.020 (Non -conforming buildings). A
legal non -conforming building is defined as a building that once met the bulk zoning standards
and the site development standards applicable to its construction, but is no longer conforming do
to the enactment or amendment of the zoning ordinance or due to annexation into the City of
Edmonds.
City of Edmonds c�a Planning Division
PERM / 7- i5X -P i ji� E,5 �b -D,4 YS
7
CITY OF EDMONDS
9 0 19
Address of Construction:
Property Legal Description (Include all easements): J-ce,
RECEIV:EP --S
Owner and/or Contractor:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
At/
PERMIT N _0 9014 0
State License No. rel 0 Building Permit No. 4F 001--l—
,e ringle Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No El Yes
4
El Multi -Family (No. of Units-) RW Construction Permit No.
Commercial Cross other Private Property: No El Yes
El Public Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement
I certify that I have read and shall comply7with all city requirements
as indicated on the back of the Permit Card.
. 1?_r __/_ ?
Date
* CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION Or
OF F I C E VSE.'ONLIir��,
FOR INSPECTION CALL 771--laM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
Permit Fee: (00,00 Issued By 2Z6
Trunk Charge- zz� Do Date Issued: _3_0_�791
Assessment Fee: Receipt No - /Z
Lid No.: -
Partial Inspection: Azeej To ft- III;" C4.,atcy-m- 7w JJ60 C_ Date 3-4 Initial CC
Comments
Reason Rejected: Date -initial
Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
Wh He Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant I . I , �- I Revised 3190
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - --------------------------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION X REPAIRS F� LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER................................................................................................ CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO. ..qjN0
JOB ADDRESS ..... ........................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
......................................................................................................... ........................................................
NAME OF ADDITION ----------------------------------------------------------- �,o
.. ............. ........... -----------
vvvvv-uuu I -I I Ito (Ktv.11 I I t5) ......................... jjy -----------------------------
\7
1.
The City of Edmonds
Side Sewer Drawing
EASEIMLNT NO . ....... ------------------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION ly i(ILPAWS LID No . .......... ....... ASmT. NO . ..................
/-I J 00'%
7-75�`
OWNER............. -,a.a ..... ..................... CONTRACTOR ......... ..................................... - ................................... PERMIT NO.
JOB ADDRESS ..10.13al ......... ---- ----- .... ........ LEGAL DESCRIPTIuN: LOT NO . ......... ............................ BLOCK NO . ....................................
................ ....................................................................................... I ........................ - ..............................
XlAkAr C)V AT'll-)l'l'lnKl
c4 FLE so. 96 -2
Critical Areas Checklist
--------------------------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
I Site Address/Location: Zg-
'a AY 6,c)
'16 -
2. Property Tax Account Number:
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? - yes; _1X__T1o.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 3 ) 0% ( a vertical rise of
I 0-feet over a horizontal distance of 3 3 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 ) 0% present on site (a vertical rise of 1 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standinc, water: NO
Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway AX floodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? V0 Flows are seasonal? . (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
�ca_chk.doc; Re� 10103/97
. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer
November 4, 1997
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Chief Financial Officer
Lynnwood Mortgage Corporation
6505 - 218th Street S.W., Suite 9
Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation - Lots 2 and 3
Approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, WA
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the
property at approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, Washington. This
evaluation was necessitated by owner and developer concems, as well as City of
Edmonds requirements.
REFERENCES:
• Vicinity Map (figure 1)
• Topographic Survey Map by Chadwick and Winters, of Lots 2 and 3
dated October, 1997
• Site photographs (available)
BACKGROUND:
It is understood that Lots 2 and 3 are part of an overall parcel containing Lot No.
1 with existing residence, and Lots 2, 3 and 4 (see Survey map and plot plans). This
investigation deals with Lots 2 and 3 with regard to geotechnical slope issues. It is
understood that property owner wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 3
and another single family residence on Lot 2. No development or construction has
occurred on either Lot 2 or 3 to date.
Lots 2 and 3 contain a "flatter" portion, as well as a more steeply sloped rear
(southerly portion). The flatter portions of the lots currently consist of lawn grasses,
with a few mature trees. The steeper (southerly) portion of the lots are densely
vegetated with shrubs, bushes and trees (see photographs).
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION DRAINAGE - DESIGN &PERMIT - LEGAL
17814 8th Ave. N.W. - Shoreline, Washington 98177 (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
vtachment 6
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Pagetwo
ASSESSMENT:
While not within the scope of this evaluation, this engineer assessed the
existing residence on Lot 1 for any geotechnical distress. No evidence of any
foundation settlements or shifting were observed. Visual assessments of Lots 2 and 3
by this engineer throughout the past year revealed no evidence of any geotechnical
distress: No sliding, no creep, no shifting, nor any significant erosional degradation
was observed on the overall property, including Lots 2 and 3.
In order to augment existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were
dug (by backhoe) under this engineer's observation on August 9, 1997.
See soil test pit logs (attached).
The findings of the four soil test pits (plotted on the Survey Topographic Map)
were very similar. Namely: dense brown, silty sand to approximately three (3) to four
(4) foot depths. Dense to very dense grayish brown weathered glacial till (hardpan).
No ground water was present in any of the four soil test pits. All test pit walls
remained vertical and stable throughout the excavated time frame (approximately two
hours).
CO NC LUSIO NS/R ECO M MEN DATIO NS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in
the area, Lots 2 and 3 are geotechnically approved for the proposed single family
residences, subject to the following conditions*:
Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
pressure: 2,000 p.s.f.
Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall
provided the drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer.
For retaining wall design, use a friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of
350 p.c.f.
The foundations for the proposed StFUctures may be placed anywhere on Lots
2 and 3, outside of the dashed top -of -bank survey area (see Topographic map).
In other words there are no geotechnical limitations to the proximity of the
proposed resi�ences and the top -of -slope line. (it is geotechnically
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page three
possible, but not likely, to property construct a foundation on the steeper
portions of Lots 2 and 3. This would require uneconomic stabilizing techniques
and methods).
To be clear, the geotechnical set -back distance to the top -of -bank dashed line is
zero. It is understood that political or zoning set -back distances do apply per
City of Edmonds requirements. It is important to restate, however, that no set-
back distance is essential for geotechnical reasons. If desired, exceptions or
variances could be pursued.
Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement.
. The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and
spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above
native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill
for structural fill placement and -compaction recommendations. Continuous and
individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-
four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches
below the lower adjacent finish ground surface.
Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required
below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill
the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least
as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width.
For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot
wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per
square foot (p.s.f.), A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used
when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is
anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent,
native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half
inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between
the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the
foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill
placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page four
recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to
lateral loading:
Parameter
Coefficient of Friction
Passive Earth Pressure
Where:
Design Value
0.55
350 p.c.f.
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
SLABS -ON -GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils
or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these
soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel
underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4)
inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic
membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls backfilled on one side only sh . ould be designed to resist lateral
earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following
recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height
which restrain level backfill:
Parameter
Active Earth Pressure*
Passive Earth Pressure
Coefficient of Friction
Soil Unit Weight
Design Value
30 p.c.f.
350 p.c.f.
0.55
125 p.c.f.
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page five
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid
densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent fluid pressure).
The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and
retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing
the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and
sliding.
The above design values do not hclude the effects of any hydrostatic pressures
behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above
the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above
lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will
need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the
appropriate design earth pressures.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and
foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are
designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement
and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment.
Retaining Wall Backfill
Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls
should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should
contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater
than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve
should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt
content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi
and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage
composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. the
purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the
retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind
the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Mr.
Dennis V. O'Leary
Page six
recommendations regarding placement and ecompaction of structural fill behind
retaining and foundation walls.
EXCAVATION AND SLOPES:
In no case should excavation, slopes bee greater than the limits specified in local,
state and national government safety regulatijons. Temporary cuts up to a height of
four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may bEa vertical. For temporary cuts having a
height greater than four (4) feet, the cut shou ild have an inclination no steeper than 1:1
(Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. Under
specific recommendations by the geo-technical engineer, excavation cuts
may be modified for site conditions. All pern-ianent cuts into native soils should be
inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is
imporlant to note that sands do cave suddenl'y, and without warning. The contractors
should be made aware of this potential hazarrd.
Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary
or permanent slope. All permanently exposeed slopes should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation to reduce Eerosion and improve stability of the
surficial layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
Footing drains are recommended at th e base of all footings and retaining walls.
These drains should be surrounded by at lea:st six (6) inches of one -inch -minus
washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextil le filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or
similar material). At the highest point, the per-forated pipe invert should be at least as
low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and
surface water drains must be kept separate fr-orn the foundation drain system.
No groundwater was observed in any of the test pits during the field work.
Seepage into the planned excavation is poss ible, and likely if excavation occurs
during winter months, and if encountered sho, -uld be drained away from the'site by use
of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French cdrains, or by pumping from sumps
interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation.
The excavation and site should be gracJed so that surface water is directed off
the site and away from the tops of slopes. Weater should not be allowed to stand in any
area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed
slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize -erosion. Final site grading in areas
adjacent to buildings should be sloped at leaat two (2) percent away from the building,
except where the area adjacent to the buildingg is paved.
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page seven
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of
all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped
or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural
fill.
NOTE: Specific clearing limits to'be established at pre -construction meeting with City
of Edmonds building officials and inspectors.
Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent
retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils needs to
support loads. This engineer should observe site conditions during and after
excavation prior to placement of any structural fill.
All structural fill should be placed. in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or
near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture
content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of
fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and
compaction process.
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type,
compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case
should the lift's exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table
presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Location of Fill Placement
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways
Behind retaining walls
Beneath pavements
Minimum Relative
Compaction
95%
90%
95% for upper 12 inches of .
subgrade, 90% below that level
Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor).
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page eight
Use of On -Site Soils
If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils
are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the
potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are
moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of
these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content.
Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
"pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater
than the optimum moisture content.
Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a
granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage
of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil
passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material may be acceatable if the upper
organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering
inspection.
DRAINAGE CONTROLS:
No drainage problems were evident on Lots 2 and 3. Surface runoff flows
generally westerly (from the flatter portions of the lots). This engineer recommends
compliance with the City of Edmonds standard storm water drainage controls. The
surficial sandy soils are such that it is practical to utilize an Infiltration storm water
system.
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls,
etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete
mix.
INSPECTION:
The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
• Soil cut s
• Foundation subgrade verification
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page nine
• Any retaining wall, or rockery placement
• Any fill placement and compaction
• Subsurface drainage installation
SUMMARY:
The two proposed single family residences (on Lots 2 and 3) are
geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the
recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans
and key geotechnical inspection during construction.
There are no geotechnical constraints limiting the proximity of the proposed
residences to any sloped portion of the property. As a practical measure, this
engineer recommends the residences be situated no further southerly than the
dashed top -of -slope line. If desired, however, it is geotechnically feasible to
construct the residences beyond (more southerly) than the dashed survey line.
GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS:
Prior to the City of Edmonds issuing a building permit, this engineer should
review the specific house plans for compliance with the recommendations of this
geotechnical report.
CLOSURE:
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other
warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results
of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between explored
locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different
than those described in this report, this engineer should be notified to observe the
situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call. M. .6
0
roi
17405
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
DMB:vIb Geotechnical/Civil Engineer
fEXPIRES I=Y i't4t7-
�e�
14 qv"11 I �
LAAOIA05
FE BLACH
UNION
Olt HMIL WY
0
ry�
I T—)
BEACH i 3 $2
ce
26
BELLA COOLA
It
T
BROWNS
BAY
7
FRECIERICy, PL.
SNO"ISH
mwTy
),�m pt PARK
z sw
YIN
0 00K PK
Ee a
MITT !r"',
PIC
MIT
09TH Si Sw
w
ST Sw 190TH $I SIT
CHERR T 191ST
'1610
192 ST
sw
1967 H
PLIGE I DR —
LODY LN
4 V MAND t PA
OR
RE ST
CT
VISTA BMW IISIA ST Swe', a"
SIFR"'
Eli
GLEN
SILM ST
Z4 ST Al
Is
PINE
�E RIME
ST FX
ST SF ft Sw
ELI
78 "Q.—u—,
ST
- ;;pu
ST YOST
IAL SIT
,LDE
[BAR cl
I
swi-
9 f
217TH ST sw
k
It
Z". SIT
218TH
Y;
sw
�s
307
E
s 22 TH
QL ST
sw
9 -. ..m. -
15
'Qu
T;j, t.
of;
N
16 WK,
-.� it.
w
gw
w:
-1 ix
gq'
wrl
J..
t, IbUM
..........
a ig
.77
11-
L U
v 7!1
5B
,57
zig
Al
It,
I -An 0
7 -.-:L
ti
�!tt olp
75
It
Wl
"t4l
D
71
FRI
- �,%
TI
DO
M,
w
Hil t, 9
. fle,
lci
4
IBM,
ml
Qa,
Nil
41
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical /Civil Engineer
December 1, 1998
City of Edmonds
c/o McGrew & Michel, Designers
8022 - 212th Street S.W.
Edmonds, Washington 98026
SJURDIND
DEC 0 3 1998
Subject: Geotechnicall Addendum
Building Permit Plan Check No. 98-372
O'Leary Residence, 18130 - 84th Avenue West, Edmonds
This engineering letter responds to the City of Edmonds Plan Check Corrections
list dated November 17, 1998 for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary residence (Plan
Check No. 98-372).
References:
• Geotechnical report by D. Bruce, P.E.
• Project plans by McGrew & Michel
Background:
This engineer is currently providing on -site geotechnical inspection services for
the Michel Construction Inc., single family residence on Lot No. 2 (18132 - 84th
Avenue West). Geotechnical conditions are in accordance with those anticipated by
this engineer.
This engineer has reviewed the project plans for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary
residence, to be constructed on Lot No. 3 (easterly of the existing construction on Lot
No. 2). This engineer has worked with project contractor to stake out the proposed
building footprint.
Geotechnical Review of Plans:
This engineer has reviewed the specific plans for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary
residence on Lot No. 3 (18130 - 84th Avenue West, Edmonds). The proposed
residence layout is in accordance with the recommendations of this engineer's
November 4, 1997 geotechnical report. It is understood that this engineer will provide
on -site geotechnical inspections during the construction phase.of this residence.
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN& PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
McGrew -Michel
Re: O'Leary Residence
December 1, 1998
Page two
Conclusions:
The proposed building plans for Lot No. 3, are geotechnically approved
subject to specific inspections by this engineer.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Al.
'WA S
eL
4CM
17405 4:k-
-is
I EXPIRES 12/23/ 111 fD
DMB:vIb
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
Geotechnical / Civil Engineer
Dennis M. Bruce, RE.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A.
December 1, 1998
City of Edmonds
c/6 McGrew & Michel, Designers
8022 - 212th Street S.W.
Edmonds, Washington 98026
Geotechnical/ Civil Engineer
Subject: Geotechnical Addendum
Building Permit Plan Check No. 98-372
O'Leary Residence, 18130 - 84th Avenue West, Edmonds
This engineering letter responds to the City of Edmonds Plan Check Corrections
list dated November 17, 1998 for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary residence (Plan
Check No. 98-372).
References:
• Geotechnical report by D. Bruce, P.E.
• Project plans by McGrew & Michel
Backaround:
This engineer is currently providing on -site geotechnical inspection services for
the Michel Construction Inc., single family residence on Lot No. 2 (18132 - 84th
Avenue West). Geotechnical conditions are in accordance with those anticipated by
this engineer.
This engineer has reviewed the project plans for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary
residence, to be constructed on Lot No. 3 (easterly of the existing construction on Lot
No. 2). This engineer has worked with project contractor to stake out the proposed
building footprint.
Geotechnical Review of Plans:
This engineer has reviewed the specific plans for the Dennis and Carla O'Leary
residence on Lot No. 3 (18130 - 84th Avenue West, Edmonds). The proposed
residence layout is in accordance with the recommendations of this engineer's
November 4, 1997 geotechnical report. It is understood that this engineer will provide
on -site geotechnical inspections during the construction phase,of this residence.
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT - INSPECTION - DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL
P.O. Box 55502 - Shoreline, Washington 98155 - (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
McGrew -Michel
Re: O'Leary Residence
December 1, 1998
Pagetwo
Conclusions:
The proposed building plans for Lot No. 3, are geotechnically approved
subject to specific inspections by this engineer.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
WAS
0
17405
0- STS
AL
I EXPIRES 12/23/ 111 fD
DMB:vIb
A,v �- A aAx--_w_4
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
Geotechnical / Civil Engineer
CA FILE NO. W-2 & -7
Critical Areas Checklist
-----------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrol egetation)
I Site Address/Location: -),k ZY, V 6d
2. Property Tax Account Number:
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? _ yes; _��_o.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 3 ) 0% ( a vertical rise of
10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 ) 0% present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year. -round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: AJQ Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site,is in the floodway MJ floodplain- of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? �Jp Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested r,14— meadow ;shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
�ca_chk.doc; Rev 10/03/97
-7-5:x
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
!;, 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER — ,—%
S t
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
j, JAII 2
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
j-
APPLICANT: Rob Michp]
CASE NO.:
LOCATION:
V 97-145
Lot 2 of Short Plat S-28-79; 84xx Olympic View Drive (see
Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
APPLICATION: A reasonable use variance to reduce both the required 50 foot
critical area buffer to zero and 15 foot building setback from the
critical area buffer to zero, to allow the construction of a 2,100
square foot house and 900 square foot garage (see Exhibit A,
C
Attachments 2 and 3 )).
REVIEW PROCESS: Variance: Hearina Examiner conducts public hearing, and makes
final decision.
MAJOR ISSUES:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Section 16.20.030 (SF�GLE-FANM-Y RESIDENTLA1 - Site
Development Standards).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.85 (VARLANCES).
c. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.15B.040.C. (REASONABLE USE)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation: Approve modification with conditions loin =112
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approve with conditions - NOV - 3 1998
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing, the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
1�
after visiting, the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The
c
hearing on the application was opened at 10:44 a.m., January 15, 1998, in the City Hall,
z'
Edmonds, Washington, and closed for oral testimony at 11:46 a.m. The hearing was held open
until 5:00 p.m., January 15, 1998 to allow staff to submit information requested by the e*xaminer.
0 Incorpormed August 11, 1890 9
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 2
Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A
verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the Planning Division.
HEARING TESTIMONY:
The following is a summary of the testimony offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Karissa Kawamoto, Project Planner, reviewed the staff advisory report (Exhibit A) and
recommended a modified approval the request.
From the Applicant:
Rob Michel, applicant, submitted Exhibits B, C, D & F into the record. He read from
Exhibit F which outlined his arguments and proposed changes to conditions
recommended by City staff in Exhibit A.
Dennis Bruce, PE, applicant's engineer, discussed the geotechnical report (Attachment 7
to Exhibit A) and testified that from an engineering standpoint there would be no hazard
to the slope or to other properties if the proposal is built in accordance with the
recommendations found in the geotechnical report.
Jay Young, real estate broker, submitted Exhibits F & G into the record and. testified that
in his opinion the 15 foot setback from the top of the slope, as recommended by staff,
would place an unnecessary financial hardship on the owner of the lot because of view
impacts.
From the Community:
No one from the general community spoke at the hearing.
C,
CORRESPONDENCE:
One letter objecting to the request was received (Attachment 8 to Exhibit A).
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
1) Size: The subject property is approximately 17,952 square feet (see
Exhibit A, Attachment 7).
2) Land Use: The subject property is undeveloped and vacant.
3) Zoning: The subject property is located in a Single -Family Residential
(RS- 12) zone (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
4) Terrain and Vegetation: The steep slope critical area is located in the
southern portion of the property. It contains dense vegetation, shrubs,
C>
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 3
blackberry and trees. The northern portion has a moderate rise with
fewer trees and the ground is covered by grass.
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a. Fact: The properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned
Single -Family Residential (RS-12) and either vacant or are developed
with single-family homes (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
B. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
1. Fact: Variances granted based on special circumstances are exempt from
SEPA review (WAC 197-11-800(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15A.080).
C. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
1. Critical Areas Compliance
a. Facts:
1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.153
(Critical Areas Ordinance).
2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist (CA-97-236)
and it was determined that a study was required.
b. Conclusion: The survey and top of slope determination dated October
1997 was done by Robert Winters P.L.S. of Chadwick and Winters. A
geotechnical report dated November 4, 1997 was performed by Dennis
Bruce, P.E. It supports the request to construct within the critical area
building setback and buffer.
2. Compliance with RS-12 Zoning Standards
a. Fact: The short plat (S-28-79) declared this property a flag lot.
Current policy in regards to flag lot setbacks is to consider all setbacks
as "side" setbacks.
b. Conclusion: The structure as proposed will comply with the
requirements of the RS-12 zoning standards.
D. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR A VARIANCE
Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.180. establishes the criteria (special circumstance and
the minimum variance necessary) with which a Critical Area Variance may be granted
by the Hearing Examiner. The applicant has submitted declarations with their
submittal which address the variance decisional criteria as follows (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 3):
a) Special Circumstances (applicant statement): Because of the special
circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape,
topography, location of surrounding steep slopes, strict application of this title
would deprive the subject property all reasonable use of the property. See
attached plot plan showing,, a building area of only 486 square feet.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 4
b) Minimum variance, not materially detrimental (applicant statement): The
granting of this variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the
development proposal which is a building area enjoyed by other lot owners in
the area. This proposal will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which
the property is situated because development will follow the engineer's
guidelines and described in the attached Geological report. The proposed
development is not contrary to the goals and purposes of the chapter.
E. COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR REASONABLE USE
EXCEPTION
1. Fact: ECDC Section 20.15B.040(C) establishes the decisional criteria for a
Reasonable Use Exception approval by the Hearing Examiner. Criteria number 7
states that a reasonable use exception may only be applied for if a variance pursuant
to ECDC Section 20.15B. 170(A).
a) Denial of Reasonable Use (applicant statement): This chapter would deny all
reasonable use of the subject property because Chapter 20.15B. I 10 of the
Edmonds Community Development Code requires a fifty (50) foot wide buffer
from geological hazardous areas and section 20.15B.080 (C) requires a fifteen
(15) foot building set back from any required buffer. Please see attached drawing
which leaves only 486 square feet of building area.
b) No other reasonable use consistent with zoning (applicant statement): There is no
other reasonable use consistent with the underlying zoning with less impact on the
1. 0
critical area or its buffer, either primary or permitted secondary uses.
c) No unreasonable threat to public (applicant statement): The proposed
development will not pose any threat to the public health, safely or welfare on or
off the property because the proposed single family residence will be built in
accordance with the Geotechnical Engineer's guidelines. All development will be
performed within the property lines with strict controls to prevent any debris or
material encroaching onto adjacent properties.
d) Minimum reduction of critical area to allow for reasonable use (applicant
statement): The proposed alteration to the critical area and its buffer will be
minimized as much as possible to allow a reasonable building area as enjoyed by
existing lot owners in the area. No building is planned in the 40% slope area and
the proposed building will be set back approximately 25 feet from the west
property line.
e) Compliance with all other State and Federal laws (applicant statement) The
proposed activity complies with all state local and federal laws. No sediment or
pollution challenges. No floodplains involved. Wastewater to be removed from
site through city sewer system.
k
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
P -e 5
a.,
f) Requested Reasonable Use Exception is not due to any current or previous owners
action (applicant statement): Since the lot was platted and recorded in 198 1, the
economic use deficiency was created after the effective date of the adoption of
this new ordinance.
ONCLUSIONS FOR THE VARIANCE CRITERIA:
F. C
The site has both an upward and downward slope. The critical slope virtua ly
splits the subject property in half. After the critical area buffer, the additional
building setback from the buffer, and the standard setback from the other property
lines, a small, odd shaped building envelope remains.
2. The building footprint proposed by the applicant is 2, 100 square for the house and
ge. As proposed, the garage would be up to the top
a 900 square foot attached garat'.. t)
of slope identified by the geotechnical study and a side property line setback to the
east and the majority of the home appears to be at least 15 feet away from the top
of slope. The geotechnical report does indicate a very stable slope and
C>
construction can occur anywhere on the property with proper techniques and
materials.
G. CONCLUSIONS FOR THE REASONABLE USE CRITERIA:
1. The size and location of the critical area is such that the use of the property is
limited to a very small, odd shaped home. An exception is necessary to allow
a reasonable use of the property.
2. The RS-12 zoning designation limits development of the property to
residential homes and accessory uses, similar to what is proposed.
The geotechnical evaluation performed by Dennis Bruce P.E. dated November
4, 1997 approved construction on the site subject to several conditions and
recommendations.
4. The applicant has requested elimination of both the 50 foot critical area buffer
and 15 foot building setback from a critical area buffer. If approved as
conditioned below, the proposal would have a minimal temporary impact on
the critical area and will allow for a reasonable use of the property.
5. The proposal will comply with all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances
with the exception of these variance requests.
6. The short plat which created this lot was processed in the late 70's, early 80's,
tk. prior to adoption of the Critical Areas chapter of the ECDC. None of the lots
from the short plat have had development requests to date. It does not appear
as if the reasonable use exception or variance request is the result of the
actions of the current or previous owners.
EWA,,",
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 6
11. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
1. Review by City Departments
a. Fact: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated by the
Fire Department, Public Works Division, Engineering Division, and
the Parks and Recreation Division. No comments were received.
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC)
1. Comprehensive Plan Designation
a) Fact: The subject property is designated as "Single Family" residential on the
comprehensive plan.
b) Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the existing
Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the site.
2. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies
a. Fact: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential Development section, identifies goals
and policies which relate to "Residential Development" in the City. Specific goals
and policies are discussed in detail below.
1) Section B states as a Goal of the City that: "High quality residential
development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds
residents should be maintained and promoted ......
b. Conclusion: The proposed development is consistent with the above adopted
goals and policies of the City for residential property in the City.
c. Facts: The Soils and Topography section of the Comprehensive Plan identifies
the following goal and policies:
1) Section C states as a Goal of the City that: "Development on steep
slopes or hazardous soil conditions should preserve the natural features
of the site, in accordance with the following policies:"
a. C. La. Grading, filling, and tree cutting shall be
restricted to building pads, driveways, access ways and
other imperious surfaces.
b. C. Lb. Grading shall not jeopardize the stability of any
slope, or of an adjacent property.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 7
J. COMMENTS
1. On January 7, 1998, the City received a letter (Exhibit A, Attachment 8) from
Mr. Robert.Irwin who lives at 18119 85th PI W. Edmonds. His letter stated
the following concern with the proposal:
a. He is against any change to allow any crowding, encroachment or other
placement that would allow a building to be placed where one would not
be allowed now.
K. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
The letter does not identify how this proposal does not meet the Reasonable Use Exception or
variance criteria or provide reasons for staff to use in making a recommendation for denial.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance as shown on
Exhibit A, Attachment 5 is approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. Flag top of slope identified by the October 1997 topographic, survey performed by
Chadwick & Winters prior to any construction activity.
2. For construction purposes, a 5 foot activity easement within the critical area adjacent to
the southeast corner of the proposed garage will be allowed. A construction sequence
plan is to be provided with the building permit application to demonstrate intrusions into
the activity easement and proposals for restoration.
3. Install a temporary chain link fence south of the garage and a temporary fabric fence
south and west of the house to protect the critical area slope from intrusions. The
location of the fences shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval
prior to installation.
4. Prior to issuance of the building permit, a Critical Area Tract and Notice on Title
(supplied by the City) of the critical area and buffer per ECDC 20.15B.160.A.&B. must
be recorded with Snohomish County.
5. All design and construction activity shall adhere to the suggestions and recommendations
0
made in the geotechnical report by Robert Bruce P.E. (Attachment 7 to Exhibit A).
6. Any future expansion, additions, accessory structures etc. must comply with standard
zoning, setbacks or apply for variances.
C)
7. The applicant shall comply with the original short plat conditions of approval (see Exhibit
A, Attachment 7).
8. The applicant must obtain all necessary permits prior to any construction.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 8
9. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
10. The permit is transferable.
Entered this 21" day of January, 1998, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
r -S��
6n.
Ron McConnell
Hearing Examiner
RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
REgUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the subject of such decision. or recommendation.. The reconsideration request must
cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
z:1
APPEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-145
Page 9
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIBITS:
The following exhibits were offered and entered into the record.
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
B. Detailed list of houses built in previous seven years (from Snohomish County
records)
C. Site plan for house proposed to be located on Lot 3 (adjacent to the subject lot).
D. Site plan for Clay/Kerr and Schoner/Dulin homes (V-96-43 & V-96-41).
E. Copy of Rob Michel's hearing comments.
F. Two plat maps submitted by Jay Young.
G. Copy of Jay Young's hearing comments.
H. Viewfoil showing staff recommended 15 foot building setback.
I. Floor plans of Clay/Kerr & Schoner/Dulin homes.
PARTIES OF RECORD:
Rob Michel
8022 212" St. SW
Edmonds, WA 98026
Dennis Bruce, PE
17814-8 1h Ave. NW
Shoreline, WA 98177
Jay Young
1881092 d Ave. W
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds Planning Division
Edmonds Engineering Division
Robert Irwin
18119 85" Pl. W.
Edmonds, WA 98026
Dennis O'Leary
6632 192 nd Pl. SW
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geolechnical /Civil Engineer
November 4,'1997
bi
JAM MI
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary NOV - 3 1998
Chief Financial Officer
Lynnwood Mortgage Corporation
6505 - 218th Street S.W., Suite 9
Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043
Subject: Geotechnical Evaluation Lots 2 and 3
Approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, WA
This engineering report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation of the
property at approximately 84th Place and 182nd Place, Edmonds, Washington. This
evaluation was necessitated by owner and developer concerns, as well as City of
Edmonds requirements.
REFERENCES:
• Vicinity Map (figure 1)
Topographic Survey Map by Chadwick and Winters, of Lots 2 and 3
dated October, 1997
• Site photographs (available)
BACKGROUND:
It is understood that Lots 2 and 3 are part of an overall parcel containing Lot No.
1 with existing residence, and Lots 2, 3 and 4 (see Survey map and plot plans). This
investigation deals with Lots 2 and 3 with regard to geotechnical slope issues. It is
understood that property owner wishes to construct a single family residence on Lot 3
and another single family residence on Lot 2. No development or construction has
occurred on either Lot 2 or 3 to date.
Lots 2 and 3 contain a "flatter" portion, as well as a more stee . ply sloped rear
(southerly portion). The flatter portions of the lots currently consist of lawn grasses,
with a few mature trees. The steeper (southerly) portion of the lots are densely
vegetated with shrubs, bushes and trees (see photographs).
SOILS - FOUNDATIONS - SITE DEVELOPMENT -. INSPECTION DRAINAGE - DESIGN & PERMIT - LEGAL
17814 8th Ave. N.W. - Shoreline, Washington 98177 (206) 546-9217 - FAX 546-8442
%ttachment 6 '
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page two
ASSESSMENT:
While not within the scope of this evaluation, this engineer assessed the
existing residence on Lot 1 for any geotechnical distress. No evidence of any
foundation settlements or shifting were observed. Visual assessments of Lots 2 and 3
by this engineer throughout the past year revealed no evidence of any geotechnical
distress: No sliding, no creep, no shifting, nor any significant erosional degradation
was observed on the overall property, including Lots 2 and 3.
In order to augment existing site geotechnical information, soil test pits were
dug (by backhoe) under this engineer's observation on August 9, 1997.
See soil test pit logs (attached).
The findings of the four soil test pits (plotted on the Survey Topographic Map)
were very similar. Namely: dense brown, silty sand to approximately three (3) to four
(4) foot depths. Dense to very dense grayish brown weathered glacial till (hardpan).
No ground water was present in any of the four soil test pits. All test pit walls
remained vertical and stable throughout the excavated time frame (approximately two
hours).
CO NC LUS10 NS/R ECO MM EN DATIO NS:
Based on the findings of this investigation, and experience with similar sites in
the area, Lots 2 and 3 are geotechnically approved for the proposed single family
residences, subject to the following conditions:
Standard reinforced continuous and spread footings. Allowable bearing
pressure: 2,000 p-s-f-
Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 p.c.f. is recommended for any retaining wall
provided the drainage zone is inspected and verified by this engineer.
For retaining wall design, use a friction factor of 0.55 and passive pressure of
350 p.c.f.
The foundations for the proposed structures may be placed anywhere on Lots
2 and 3, outside of the dashed top -of -bank survey area (see Topographic map).
In other words, there are no geotechnical limitations to the proximity of the
proposed residences and the top -of -slope line. (It is geotechnically
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page three
possible, but not likely, to properly construct a foundation on the steeper
portions of Lots 2 and 3. This would require uneconomic stabilizing techniques
and methods).
To be clear, the geotechnical set -back distance to the top -of -bank dashed line is
zero. It is understood that political or zoning set -back distances do apply per
City of Edmonds requirements. It is important to restate, however, that no set-
back distance is essential for geotechnical reasons. If desired, exceptions or
variances could be pursued.
Geotechnical inspection by this engineer prior to any foundation concrete
placement.
The proposed structures can be supported on conventional continuous and
spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soils or on structural fill placed above
native soils. See the later sub -section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill
for structural fill placement and compaction recommendations. Continuous and
individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-
four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18) inches
below the lower adjacent finish ground surface.
Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required
below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill
the over excavated hole, the width of the overexcavation at the bottom must be at least
as wide as the sum of two times the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width.
For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three-foot
wide footing must be at least seven feet wide at the base of the excavation.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be
designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per
square foot (p.s.f.). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used
when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is
anticipated that total post -construction settlement of footings founded on competent,
native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness) will be about one-half
inch, with differential settlements on the order of one -quarter inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between
the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the
vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the
foundations must either be poured directly against undisturbed soil or the backfill
placed around the outside of the foundation must be level structural fill. We
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page four
recommend the following design values be used for the foundation I s resistance to
lateral loading:
Parameter
Coefficient of Friction.
Passive Earth Pressure
Where:
Design Value
0.55
350 P.C.f.
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot.
(2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density.
We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
SLABS -ON -GRADE:
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils
or on structural fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these
soils can be recompacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel
underneath the slab. This sand and gravel layer should be a minimum of four (4)
inches thick. We also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6-mil. plastic
membrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing purposes.
PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS:
Retaining walls backfilled on one side only sh ould be designed to resist lateral
earth pressures impo . sed by the soils retained by these structures. The following
recommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve (12) feet in height
which restrain level backfill:
Parameter
Active Earth Pressure*
Passive Earth Pressure
Coefficient of Friction
Soil Unit Weight
Design Value
30 p.c.f.
350 p.c.f.
0.55
125 p.c.f.
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page five
Where:
(1) p.c.f. is pounds per cubic foot
(2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid
densities.
For restrained walls which cannot deflect at least 0.002 times the wall
height, a uniform lateral pressure of one hundred (100 p.s.f. should be
added to the active equivalent fluid pressure).
The values given above are to be used for des ' ign of permanent foundation and
retaining walls only. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing
the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and
sliding.
The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures
behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above
the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above
lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will
need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the
appropriate design earth pressures.
Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and
foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are
designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement
and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated
equipment.
Retaining Wall Backfill
Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls
should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should
contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater
than four (4) inches in diameter, The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve
should be between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Due to their high silt
content, if the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage.composite, such as Mirafi
and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage
composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. th * e
purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the
retaining wall as not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind
the wall. The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains Mr.
Dennis V. O'Leary
Page six
recommendations regarding placement and compaoAction of structural fill behind
retaining and foundation walls.
EXCAVATION AND SLOPES:
In no case should excavation. slopes be grealtater than the limits specified in local,
state and national government safety regulations. TTemporary cuts up to a height of
four (4) feet deep in unsaturated soils may be vertics:al. For temporary cuts having a
height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should havege an inclination no steeper than 1:1
(Horizontal: Vertical) from the top of the slope to the 1:1 bottom of the excavation. Under
specific recommendations by the geotechni-iical engineer, excavation cuts
may be modified for site conditions. All permanent, - cuts into native soils should be
inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes shoulold not exceed 1:1 (H:V). It is
important to note that sands do cave suddenly, and - without warning. The contractors
should be made aware of this potential hazard.
Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrololled over the top of any temporary
or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopeges should be seeded with an
appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the
surficial layer of soil.
DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS:
Footing drains are recommended at the base e of all footings and retaining walls.
These drains should be surrounded by at least six (E36) inches of one -inch -minus
washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter - fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or
similar material). At the highest point, the perforated IJ pipe invert should be at least as
low as the bottom of the footing and it should be slop::ped for drainage. All roof and
surface water drains must be kept separate from the e foundation drain system.
No groundwater was observed in any of the te!est pits during the field work.
Seepage into the planned excavation is possible, an nd likely if excavation occurs
during winter months, and if encountered should be o drained away from the site by use
of drainage ditches, perforated pipe, French drains, c:)or by pumping from sumps
interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation.
The excavation and site should be graded so ttthat surface water is directed off
the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water shccDuld not be allowed to stand in any
area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to t1be constructed. Any exposed
slopes to be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. n. Final site grading in areas
adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two (22) percent away from the building,
except Where the area adjacent to the building is pav%ved.
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page seven
GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL:
The proposed building and pavement areas should b -e stripped and cleared of
all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleteri0ous material. The stripped
or removed materials should not be mixed with any materialss to be used as structural
fill.
NOTE: Specific clearing limits to be established at pre-con;struction meeting with City
of Edmonds building officials and inspectors.
Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent
retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the un-derlying soils needs to
support loads. This engineer should observe site condition--.- during and after
excavation prior to placement of any structural fill.
All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts witfh a moisture content at or
near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture
content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of
fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled duri ng the filling and
compaction process.
The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on th e material type,
compaction equipment, and the number of passes made to c. ompact the lift. In no case
should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. The following table
presents recommended relative compaction for structural fill:
Location of Fill Placement
Beneath footings, slabs or walkways
Behind retaining walls
Beneath pavements
Minimuim Relative
Comipaction
95%
90%
95% for upper 12 inches of
subgrade, 909/a below that'level
Where: Minimum relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of
the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in
accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Nodified Proctor).
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page eight
Use of On -Site Soils
If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils
are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the
potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus are
moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of
these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content.
. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening and
"pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater
than the optimum moisture content.
Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a
granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage
of. particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of the soil
passing the three -quarter -inch sieve.
The use of "some" on -site soils for fill material.may be acceptable if the upper
organic materials is segregated and moisture contents are monitored by engineering
inspection.
DRAINAGE CONTROLS:
No drainage problems were evident on Lots 2 and 3. Surface runoff flows
generally westerly (from the flatter portions of the lots). This engineer recommends
compliance with the City of Edmonds standard storm water drainage controls. The
surficial sandy soils are such that it is practical to utilize an infiltration storm water
system.
CONCRETE:
All foundation concrete (footings, stem walls, slabs, any retaining walls,
etc.) shall have a minimum cement content of 5-1/2 sacks per cubic yard of concrete
mix.
INSPECTION,
The recommendations of this report are only valid when key geotechnical
aspects are inspected by this engineer during construction:
• Soil cut's
• Foundation subgracle'verification
Mr. Dennis V. O'Leary
Page nine
• Any retaining wall, or rockery placement
• Any fill placement and compaction
• Subsurface drainage installation
SUMMARY:
The two proposed single family residences (on Lots 2 and 3) are
geotechnically viable when constructed in accordance with the
recommendations herein, compliance with City of Edmonds approved plans
and key geotechnical inspection during construction.
There are no geotechnical constraints limiting the proximity of the proposed
residences to any sloped portion of the property. As a practical measure, this
engineer recommends the residences be situated no further southerly than the
dashed top -of -slope line. If desired, however, it is geotechnically feasible to
construct the residences beyond (more southerly) than the dashed survey line.
GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF PLANS:
Prior to the City of Edmonds issuing a building permit, this engineer should
review the specific house plans for compliance with the recommendations of this
geotechnical report.
CLOSURE:
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance
with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. No other
warranty, either express or implied, is made. The conclusions are based on the results
of the field exploration and interpolation of subsurface conditions between 'explored
locations. If conditions are encountered during construction that appear to be different
than those described in thisreport, this engineer should be notified to observe the
situation and review and verify or modify the recommendations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call.
AV
Dennis M. Bruce, P.E.
DMB:vIb Geotechnical/Civil Engineer
Fm—pl�ws 1=5
�1-
BROWNS
BAY
FREDE RICK 9L
5NOW41SN
mwFy
PARK
21�9ylswpt
OVERL
imrH
rliE
IA—
I&TT
4v 87
Pt. a 187 ST
B im
as, v sy sw
89ni sl sw
E FL
ST sw
R 0 . ......
Im, s, 12
sw id
fu,m
If
I.m
PU
kELODY LN ft"T GET DR 1967 4 (zw
15 PL
tAl RDD"RE ST
4 TrQ SO
tA
BRACKMS 200TH ST SW
=LANDIIN4 WI I I I
51 Ew
(AIR ST ST sw ILI 1.
24
S,
R PRAGWO 19 a
YFI
PINE -I..
HUL RIOW �� " I
206TH
ST
MAIN
KW
If KkPLE 209TH PL
ST
DAYTON
ST I.T
H&ORIAL
SW
UNION PARK %
Fs
OIL
j
L"M CCOAR
1PARk, L
Ty
Ei*RVMS
144RIAN
fifACFJ .iiLl-*
HAM 217TH SY fj
lk ir ?ie
A 21
26 sw
X BEtLA COGLA
30�
vo
-V
PL
IN
40
If
MAI,
q ",ii;
Ri,
�.'AF
t'l �M.19 1�,T
grg!�
i7
ty'j, p. w
ir
ju,
'at
MW%
-;-I-, v,
Rplil-
N
Ile
...... ......
FYI
E41A
.... .......
34�
Y
�,. Ak
40
co co
Q0
N 87*43'02" E 72.31'
I �
IV"
;10
r
�1-5' I
�o
4v
SEE N07
11N
CIS
CZ
z
(SIN
Co.
N.
,jb
105
65 5
ttachment 4
,,�N %
CO
'10
110.00
DEC 0 1-997
kttachment 5
N 87*43'02" E 72,31'
10 b
P
SEE NOT
C CiVic Ccnier
ITY OF EIDMONDS toll
RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION
This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and
described as follows:
See Exhibit "B"
have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec.12.10)
File No.— S-28-79 subject to the following conditions and requirements:
1. Exhibit "C" Hold Harmless Agreement
2. Underground wiring to be provided in acCordance with Ordinance #1387 with
building permits.
3. Connection to city water and sanitary sewer system required with bu ldin
permits. .1. i g
4. Excavation and g rading shall conform to the requirements Outlined in Chaoter* 70
of the Uniform Building Code with buildfna permits.
5. Turn around required on all lots with bLjilding permits.
ALL REOUIREMENTS MUST BE MET AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE INSTALLEO PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
I/we certify that I/we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I/we
warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event
of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set
forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare the subdivision void
and record a statement to that effect in the- Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of
the Snoh J - n,," t* A 4 4 f-
V A.
SIGNFE
A
� 0 kilo
CA -7 d-
C,
C
)J
T-4 Z 1110 H, 111 V
DATED this day of
4, -C'-' 19
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH�
On this day frsonally appeared before me
and 13 -1, ;., A I
to me known to be the.indivi uals described
in and who executed the w" hin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged t*hat
signed,,the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses'and purposes
"mentioned.
e An
:"A�'-.Gi�ren �ndeT iny'hand and official seal this d a y
of 19 �t
I < <11.,
...........
ilt -y- 8 103 -1 .0 0 16 .1
ttach m6;
�,�X_ Ct L Q,�,, i __�, � , �A el V Ll.(/
Notary Public in and for the State of Washingt(
residing at C!
VOL V02?AGE 48
FILE JJo. S-28-79
EXHIBIT "C"
Owners, and all persons having any present or subsequent
Ownership interest in these lands, and the successors and
assigns Of owners or other parties having any said interest,
hereby agree that the City of Edmonds shall be.held harmless
in all respects from any and all claims for damages for in-
junctive relief which may be occasioned now or in the future
to adjacent land or improvements by reason of the construction,
operation and maintenance of the drainage system and hereby
waive and release the City of Edmonds from -any and all claims
fo r damages, excluding damage caused solely by an act or
Omission of said City and injunctive relief which the owners,
or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now or in
the future by reason of the construction, maintenance and
operation of said drainage system.
Z
C)
AUT140RIZED
FoT.".
7' T.-
CIT
�7
By_
Of
16'
I
VOL i7O2PAGE
49
99.2
.34
DATUM POINT (5TEEL PIN
+100 (334.73'KEID MID
'�iod\
10
3557.91
N 11 E T
IN5 0 5
9.22
Aul ="I
NOV - 3 1998 S71-REET RLE
EX15TING ACCE55 AND UTILITY EA5EMENT
10.00,
I?
5EWE '8,
WATEK
EA5MT,
105.5
D
5.00' DUFFE LINE
-inrl I I
10 Fr SET BACK LNE
3
bo
I— — — — — — — — — — --
U 72.55
Al-E
T. K�.�
102.74
40.50'
5TU15
12,419.23 50 FT
864.00 ft'
OAK.
FUTURE
HOU5E
1872.00 ft I
'N'
4
10 FT 11 IAIK LNE
FLOT FLAI
5CALE: 1" = tS
� t, 105.,0+
ID, r '11. ?, (v
6%. 102.7+
Lo — to5.5(,v -
41 t Ap 0 / + - 103'. tf
#Avg. 6AW -
City of Edmonds
CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. ' The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have compl�ted`the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best ofit " iknowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
. y
Owner/Applicant:
Name
Street Address
city State Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
city State Zip
Telephq�e
Signatur
zz :��;
Date
c:reception\jana\cac1.doc
(over)
CA FILE NO. 2
47
Critical Areas Checklist
----------------- --------------------------------------------
Site Information (soils/topography/hydrolo�y/vegetation)
I . Site Address/Location: 6�_j
2. Property Tax Account Number: ca, ay 000S
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? — yes; _��o.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of
10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 3 0% present on site (a vertical rise of 1 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (p lease describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: AJQ Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway tX floodplain of a -water course. AM11114
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows aiNevr- 3 1998
round? W Flows are seasonal? . (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow '�P4— shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
^ca_chk,doc; Re� 10/03/97
' � 'V-il .�g
PLANNING DATA
XA.MED&AA�-
SITE ADDRESS�41W4 Z�jl )4? - W DATE: -
ZONING: R'C3-(2-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: c�vvv�W.,-
C�6 r7 2
LAN CHK#:
CORNERLO (Yes/No) FLAG LOT
j _(Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
4- W
Front: Left Side: 10' Right Side: -Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: 1-7. W " Left Side: Right SldeNO. �'O�R lo
Street map checked for additional setback required?f4too (Yes/No*)—
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED -(Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE:
'�) 0 Actual:
Maximum Allowed: —
BUILDING HEIGHT- -' -1
Maximum Allowed: —Actual Height: -Z"
Ir
Datum Elevation:
Datum Point: , W
W. CREATEW:
SUBDIVISION:
'S.-O-6-79
CRITICAL AREAS
SEPA DETERMINATION:
LOTAREA:
14:18 206-672-7998
LOVELL-SAUERLAIAD
PAGE U2
991LDIM
NOV - 3 1998
Of RALL) W LO�ELL, P.L.S.
JQhG4N 61. SAU&M4.ANO, PILS.
LQU14 F. CAVILZEL. P.G.
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc.
FA�iutrs s Survcyon 9 Developiontm Consultitau - I'lannen
January 17, 1980
File No. 79-429
"'A Nop
CITY OF EOPAONDS E:NGINEERING Of
Storm k-.'atQr Calculatlon5
Exz4minod by
THONAS BERRY SHORT SUBDIVI
5-28-79
LOTS 2 AND 3 1110
Impervious Surface: Houses - 3 000 s.f.
Paving - 2,000 5.f. each lot
5,000 s.f. each lot
Percolation Rate: 3.0 minutes per inch (rield observation)
Lineal feet of trench required (as per King Co. chart attached)
82 ftet
Install 2 - 24-inch trencbes on each lot, each trench 41 feet
in length.
C�
Systems to bt- installed to a minimum depth of 48 inches.
LOT 4
Impervious Surface; - House - 1,500 a.f.
Paving- 4L800 S.f.
6,300 s.f.
Percolation Rate,: 3.0 minutes (5amp as above)
Lineal feet of trench rcquired (as above)-. 6300 s.f. x sa = 103 l.f.
5000 S.f.
Install 2 - 36-inch wide laterals, each 69 feet in length.
Trench bottom to be installed to a miniaturn depth of 48 inches.
Cq
M Ly I L4 q—,z A r-, '1 C-0— \'7a
0
# 00
Vj O-R- r
Q czj 4- 4 dri ve'lac,
2jiou - iou'rH vv. EDMONDS, WASH, 90020 PHONE 775-i�qj
F 0 0 5.2-33 f.
c,,=
--7t 6V "+�6
4-9
03/18/1998 14:18 0.06-672-7998 LOVELL-SAUERLAND PAGE 03
40
t 10
Y*
L
s
S
.......... .
Of%
r-4�
'IT
co
Ld
(L
Q
z
co
CS)
04
co
7!
IT
1-4
CC)
(n
ff)
CD
z
Lai
,Szo(
ZZ:
150
I
0 z
l'bio Rfivoz307. -
(I-10iM pilpf
-F
CS it
PERCOLATION
A TI—C
/Z /4 18
CMINUT,63 PEjq Isr-Y)
23106 fWrKAVF.YF. TM I M3
c
r 9-qg
RES
USE PERMIT
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE 17., NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT#
ADDRESS '21Z '/I _. '( )-
OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS a�r. /
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECK LID NO.
cc /5 /
U z /0-r 3
MAILING ADDRESS 'z;y;'VnV
S4
0 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET. MAP TESCP Approved
91,61,72 RW Permit Required
AIP
CITY ZIP TE EPHONE EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION Street =,Pe,,,,
�o U.
Inap c
PROPOSED Sidevir
AA 4&2A9 47-T ?z 'e?111
NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES RV REQUIRED
YES NO 0
o Px cc
Q ul
Uj z
l- ADDRESS REMAAKS' z
a: 7,1�. A,1 r z
0 _' Lu.
4 - 7 �24 4
CITY zip TELEPHONE tC_VV_f IVAI 1. 0 i
/ 4LdA C=
'64 1&2 �-_ -7761 '02 /1 - �4.(
NAdE t f'V —
ENG/INERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY
Ael ��ar V
le -
cc ADDRESS
0 FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY
U
ILL
U,
T <A/
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
z
0 VARIANCE OR CU., ADB# �HORELINI�_#
0 -7-7b-2-2-11
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE�FCPII2313 D
SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT
*/ql AU COMPLETE I EXEMPT , ALLOWED /ROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED
z LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPIf_RTY�: INCLUDE ALL EASEME A
2 FXP
�24,, dM 641"'.1 S P_ a LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED ETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
q ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT IDE , RjEAR�*' FRONT UR SIDE REAR
z
ui tot
4 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. i ' VIEWI�y dATF
1:3 f �L& AREA PLA ING
W
<qf P LFA I MAJ
NO NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING MECH ARAS_
ij AIA19- -
Ei COMPLIANCE OR
n ADDITION 0 -'Co ERCIAL CHANGE OF USE
j
M�
g M, i s, 41
REMODEL 0 APARTMENT 0 SIGN
. _______j FENCE
REPAIR GRADING 0 X CHECKEDBY ITY
CYDS FT) PF_ OF CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANT
GROUP
V r I -
DEMOLISH TANK 1:1 OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAIR�� -Z I ?;� OCCUPANT A,
ING WALL RENEWAL REQUIRED R] YES 64;,"j LOAD
z RY
Cr-) 4TY�E OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: -REMARKS
z
PRQGRESS'INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108
04 D
(n to
Uj NUMBiR CRITICAL
0 OF AREAS
(a ER OF NUMBERCA
0 STORIES LUwuNmETLsLlNG
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED
VALUATION FEE
PLAN CHECK FEE
tHEAT SOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING L68
A
VESTED DATE PLUMBING
PLAN CHECK NO: MECHANICAL
46;:= -
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL
DOMAIN (CURBS,SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES,ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE
0
a:
Ui PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
PERMIT LIMIT: I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS STORM DRAINAGE FEES
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
En HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
111 APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF
_j
2 ;N INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY. DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
cc EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANYCITY ORDINANCE
NO R LI M IT I N ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO E N FORCE ANY ORDI NANCE P ROW SI ON." TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT, AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION: AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided.
WORKMS,N�S COMPENSATI I ON INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. TURE DATE
DATE SIGNED (425) 1 OFFICIALS SIGNA
SIGN,�URE� (OWNER 0
ze9" 771-0220
,14441 VRELEASEDV DATE
ATTENTiPN J7147
IT IS UN_NYFULTO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW - INSPECTOR
GATF OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK - OWNER - GOLD - ASSESSOR
CD
LA-4
go
C i Vic
"Via -
CITY OF EDMONDS
RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION
This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and
described as follows:
See Exhibit "B"
have been divided under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec.12.10).
File No.— S-28-79 subject to the following conditions and requirements:
1. Exhibit "C" Hold Harmless Agreement
2. Underground wiring to be provided in accordance.with Ordinance #1387 with
building permits.
3. Connection to city water and sanitary sewer system required with building
permits.
4. Excavation and grading shall conform to the requirements outlined in ChaDter 70
of the Uniform Building Code with building permits.
5. Turn around required on all lots with building permits.
ALL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
I/we certify that I/we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above. I/we
warrant'that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the event
of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations set
forth -herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare the subdivision void
and record a statement to that effect in the Grantor -Grantee's Index in the office of
the Snohomish.�,,�u nty Auditor.
10
fi2 SIGNED
SO 0
N)0_1
(J
DATED this day of 19
STATE OF WASHINGTONJ ss:
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
. I
On this day pprsonally appeared before me k-l"I-111-e4:�V /_11. &_0
and 'C
__qL, to me known to be the ..'individuals described
in and who executed the w4hin and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for�the uses and purposes
n
I�Aeln mentioned.
P,:'-XiVen dnd6-r iny' hand and official seal this day of 19
0
7 k I
7: LJ
0
8`103 10% 0 16 1
Notary Public in and for the State of Washingt(
residing at c� V
VOL f702 pa-E 48
-7
0
"D
CD
cr:
,IFILE NO. S-28-79
EXHIBIT "C"
Owners, and.all persons having any present or subsequent
ownership interest in these lands, and the successors and
assigns of owners or other parties having any said interest,
hereby agree t hat the City of Edmonds shall be held harmless
in all respects from any and all claims for damages for in-
junctive relief which may be occasioned now or in the future
to adjacent* land or improvements by reason of the construction,
operation and maintenance of the drainage system and hereby
waive and release the City of Edmonds fo
rom-any and all claims
for damages, excluding damage caused solely by an act or
omission of said City and injunctive relief -which the owners,
or their successors or assigns, may themselves have now or in
the future by reason of the construction, maintenance and
operation of said -drainage system.
AUTHORIZED
FOR
CJ'T F Ell`r'v '01' DS
BY_
of
7
VOL V02PAGE
49
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
DESCRIBE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP: Tract one
F (JI R Civil,
U.,CORDING,
CITY - F E MONDS
By
Ple
(1), Edmonds ea VI—ew-Tracts,
according to plat thereof recorded in volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snoh.
County, lying south of county road; EXCEPT the following described tract: Beginning
at the North quarter corner of Section eighteen (18), Township Twenty-seven (27),
North ) Range four (4), East W. M.; thence South 0'26117"W along North and �outh
center line of said section 18 for 56.40 feet to the South line of paved county
road; thence South 65'17#170W"along South line of county road for 33.14 feet to
the East line of said tract 1 and the true point of beginning of this description;
thence South e26117"W along said East line of tract 1 for 365.52 feet; thence
North 89033,43"W 77.20 feet; thence North 16048,43"W 87-50 feet; thence North
26"52,43nw 7a.85 feet; thence North 12013,43ow 158.o5 feet to a point on South
line of said paved county road; thence Northeasterly, along said South line, for
193.50 feet, more or less, to point of beginning; ALSO EXCEPT beginning at the
North quarter corner of Section 18, Township 27 North,.Range 4 East W. M.; thence
South 0026'17'w along East line Of said Tract 1 for 56-.16' . feet�to'tha South line
of county roa&No. 640; thence South 65'23123"W along South line of said county
road 127-5.0 feet; thence along are of curve to the right having a radius of 26�.18
feet a distance of 98.40 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue
along said are a distance of 98.42 feet; thence North 71045'37"w 16.15 feet to
the intersection of centerline of private road and South line of said county road
known as Point A; thence South 2044139"W 93.51 feet; thence South 3'�26123"E 95-76
feet; thence along the are of a curve to the left having a radius of'32-74 feet a
distance of 49*19 feet; thence South 8.9031.121'.E 142.32 feet; thence North 28006113aW
58.96 feet; thence North 13026,54"w 154.96 feet to the true point of beginning.
CITY OF EDMONDS
S P.W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
0� WAS61 EXAMINED
�Pr,.oX' DATE (Con't page 2)
:�A
0
REMARKS 4440�
176
V -
01-03JW1M--- 'VOL i702PAU .50
i
(Description of entir,,--,ontiguous ownership, con't f roL--Iage 1) RF,
Y 0 DS
01 EL). 4
By
SUBJECT TO access and utilities easement described as follows: Bpg#nLIL5—at(� e
Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to the plat recorded
in Volume 3 Of Plats, Page 76, records of Snohomish County; thence N 01018154"W
196.59 feet along the East line of said Tract 1 to the Point of Beginning; thence
S 88'45121"11 78.81 feet; thence S 04050116"W 11-07 feet; thence N 81027149'W 25.13
feet; thence N 19049"47nW 9-97 feet; thence N 22020104"W 19-76 feet; thence
N 73042_145"E 39.14 feet; thence N 88041lo6"E 77-29 feet to a point on the-Ea8t
line of said Tract 1; thence S 01*18154*E 31.41 feet to the Point of Beginning.
The road on siid easement is to be maintained and owned jointly by all of the owners
of lots in this short plat. ALSO a 12 foot road easement (#Is 1000080 and 1000081)
over the following portion of said Tract 1, the center line of which is described
as follows: 'Beginning at Point A being the intersection of South line of county
road No. 640 and the center.line of said private road; thence South 2044139"w
93.51 feet; thence South 5026123"E 98-76 feet; thence along are of curve to the
left having a radius of 32-7.4 feet a distance of 49.19 feet; thence South 891,51121"E
142.32 feet to the end of easement* Also, all rightt title and interest acquired by
seller under the easement for roadway granted by that certain instrument dated
December 13, 1942, recorded December 16, 1942, Vol. 306 of Deeds, page 621, under
Auditor's File No- 739715, records of said county; and excepting and reserving all
right, title and interest acquired by Leslie C. Weedin and Mary M. Weedin, their
heirs and assigns, under said instrument.
CITY OF EDN10NDS
C) P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
ov WAS EXAMINED
BY AV44-DA,rE j-17-jj1
REMARKSg/,,,,,,
(2)
7679
LAO
VOL 1702 PACE 51
03 100161
�j
A t�.,
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
CITY UERK
Civic Cf':Jc�r
DESCRIBE EACH LOT AND PRIVATE ROAD, IF ANY: LOT 1: Beginning at the Southwest
corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to plat thereof recorded
in volume 3 of plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County; thence N 01620125"W
along the West line of said Tract 1 a distance of 151.83 feet to the Point of
Beginning; thence N 01 0 20125"W 398.44 feet to the South margin of Olympic View
Drive; thence S 72044159"E 11-72 feet to POINT�A; thence S 00055127"W 88.84 feet;
thence S 05015135"E 98-76 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left; thence
along arc of curve having a radius of 32-74 feet for a distance of 49.19 feet;
thence N 88039'27"E 142.52 feet; thence S 28041155"E 19.89 feet; thence S 18057155"E
87-50 feet; thence S 7304214gow 39.14 feet; thence 3 82022lo6"w 73-79 feet; thence
s 34"43124"w 69.68 feet; thence S 87043'02"W 72.51 feet to the Point of Beginning;
TOGETHER WITH access and utilities easement described as follows: Beginning at the
Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to the plat recorded
in Volume 3 of plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County; thence N 01018154"W
196.59 feet along the East line of said Tract 1 to the Point of Beginning; thence
S 88"45121"W 78.81 feet; thence S 04050116"W 11-07 feet; thence N 81027149"W 25.13
feet; thence N 19049,47"W 9-97 feet; thence N 22*20104"W 19-76 feet; thence
N 73042,45"E 39.14 feet; thence N 88041106"E 77.20 feet to a point on the East
line of said Tract 1; thence S 01018154"E 31.41 feet to the Point of Beginning.
The road on said easement is to be maintained and owned jointly by all of the owners
of lots in this short plat.
SUBJECT TO a 10 foot side sewer easement for Lot 2, the centerline of which is
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South lifte of said Lot 1 that
is 27-00 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North to the main
sewer line; thence West 27-00 feet to the West property line of said Lot 1.
C 11Y 0 F E D IA 0 N 1) S
C P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
AUTUTORTZED
f W AS EXAMINED TE 41
I n BY ZU&Z'"A - t-/7 (Lot 1 con-11- qa--e 4)
:,A '0
REMARKS
17679
S T IVE-
LAO 10 I-IR 11L V J, 0
-7COp
C,'TNL"
-�YNDS
BY )�w
of J-
04
LO
LIJ
C
Description of LOT l'--abrilt:
AND SUBJECT TO a 12 foot road easement (nols. 1000080 and 1000081) over the following
portion of said Tract 1, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning
at Point A being the intersection of the South line of county road No. 640 and the
center line of said private road; thence S 00655127"W 88.84 feet; thence S 05015155"E
98-76 feet; thence along arc of curve to the left having a radius of 32-74 feet
a distance of 49.19 feet; thence N 88039127"E 142.32 feet to the end of easement.
also SUBJECT TO a 10 foot easement (no. 237a360) for an underground and overhead
electric distribution line' that runs along the West line of said Lot 1; also'SUBJECT
TO a 1 foot easement (no. 1000082) for a water pipeline:serving John Steffenson
property to the North.
Description -of -LOT 2:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to
plat thereof recorded in volume 3 of'plats, Page 76, records of Snohomish County;
thence S 88045121"W along the South line of said Tract I a distance of 191.58 feet
to the Point of Beginning; thence S 88�45121"W 110.00 feet to the Southwest corner
of said Tract 1; thence N 01020125"11 151.83 feet; thence N 87043102"E 72.31 feet;
thence N 34043124"E 69.68 feet; thence N 820221WE 73-79 feet; thence S 220201c)419E
19-76-feet; thence S 81011'090W 69.31 feet; thence S 5�609136-W 32.43 feet; thence
s 14057129"E 76.28 feet; thence S 07000'34nw 91.25 feet to the Point of Beginning.
TOGETHER WITH access and utilities easement described as follows: Beginning at the
Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea Vi*ew Tracts, according to the plat recorded
in Volume 3 of plats, page 76, records.of Snohomish County; thence N 01'18154"W
196.59 feet along the East line of said Tract.1 to the Point of Beginning; thence
s 88045121"W 78.81 feet; thence C5'1,'048EiQ,-a, ON-4 011 -07 feet; thence N 81027149OW 25.13
P.W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
10. R EXAMINED AUTHORIZED -
WA,, <0 B y k1W-a--DA-1 �_X
0 FOR
0 REMARK��
NG
0 (Lot 2 con't page 5) RE-CORDI
------------- CITY F., 0 NE'
U679 -ODA- By-
IST
I LAO I VICIZPAcE 53 P �i q e- CO-) f 0
7-
q
Description of LOT 2, )n1t:
feet; thence N 19049147"W 9-97 feet; thence N 22020'04"W 19-76 feet; thence
N 73042,45"E 39.14 feet; -thence N 8841106"E 77.20 feet to a point on the East line
of said Tract 1; thence S W18154"E 31.41 feet to the Point of Beginning. The road
on said easement is to be maintained and owned jointly by all of the owners of
lots in this short pla t.
and TOGETHER WITH a 10 foot side sewer easement, the centerline of which is
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Lot I that
is 27-00 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence North to the main
sewer line; thence West 27-00 feet to the West line of said Lot 1.
SUBJECT TO permanent easement (no. 1988524) for a sanitary sewer line and/or a
storm sewer line described as follows: the West 50.00 feet of the South 10.00 feet
of said Lot 2.
Description of LOT 3:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to
plat thereof recorded in volume 3 of.plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County;
thence S 88045121"W along the South -line of said Tract 1 for a distance of 100.00
feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S 88'45t2l"W 91-58 feet; thence N 076001,54"E
91.25 feet; thence N 14057129"W 76.28 feet; thence N 3C09136"E 32.43 feet; thence
N 81'11,09nE 69.51 feet; thence S 19"49,47nE 9-97'feet; thence�.S 81c27,49nE 25.13
feet; thence S 04050116*W 186.63 feet to the Point of Beginning;
TOGETHER WITH access and utilities easement described as follows: Beginning at the
Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to the plat recorded
in Volume 3 of plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County; thence N 01*18,54"W
196-59 feet along the East line of said Tract 1 to.the Point of Beginning; thence
S 88-4592laW 78.81 feet; thencP'SYOQP50IDj.VWDBl.O7 fe et; thence N 81'27149"W 25.13
P. W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
EXAMINED
13Y AUTHORIZED
FOR
IREMARKS/2,
0 (Lot con't page 6)P, E�(7,0 !"DING
I 01\1D9
CITY 61 JE
17679 g7
BY
I LAO 3100--4--6- ot VQ2 PA'V'E '54 Pac'.f, Of ICI
34
DescriRtion of LOT 2,_,bn1t: Edmonds, Vinshin..,iton
feet; thence N 19049,47"W 9-97 feet; thence N 22020104"W 19-76 feet; thence
N 73042,45"E 39.14 feet; thence N 88041106"E 77.20 feet to a point on the East
line of said Tract 1; thence S Of 18154"E 31.41 feet to the Point of Beginning.
The road on said easement is to be maintained and owned jointly by all of the owners
of lots in this short plat. I
and TOGETHER WITH a 10 foot side sewer easement through Lot 4, the centerline
of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East side of Lot 4
that is 129.00 feet North of the Southeast corner; thence West to a point on the
West side of'said Lot 4.
Description of LOT 4:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to
plat thereof recorded in volume 3 of plats, Page 76, records of Snohomish County;
thence S 88045121"W along the South line of said Tract I a distance of 100.00
feet; thence N 04*501164E 197-70 feet; thence N 88045121"E 78.81 feet to a point on
the East line of said Tract 1; thence S 01018154"E 196.59 feet to the Point of
Beginning; TOGETHER WITH access and utilities easement described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of Tract 1, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to
the plat recorded in Volume 3 of plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County; thence
N 010181,54aw 196-59 feet along the East line of said Tract 1 to the Point of
Beginning; thence S 88045121"W 78.�l feet; thence S 04050,16nw 11-07 feet; thence
N 8lb27149"W 25-13 feet; thence N 19'49147"W 9-97 feet; thence N 22*20104"W 19-76
feet; thence N'73 42145"E 39.14 feet; thence N 88'41106"E 77.20 feet
to a point on
thq-East line of said Tract 1; thence S 01*18154"E 51.41 feet t
o the Point of
Beginning. The road on said easement is to be maintained and owned jointly by all
CITY OF EDMONDS
R P� W. DEPT. ENGINEERING DIV.
W,41 EXAMINED AUT14ORTZED
13Y ot 4 con't page 7)
01 FOR
0 REMArK RECORDING
vo_ CITY OF OND
17679
C�� Alf
/ST"" By.
LA Paj�, e Of /D
Ded'eription of LOT 4, .)nit-.
of the owners of lots in this short plat.
SUBJECT TO a 10 foot side sewer easement through Lot 4, the centerline of which is
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East side of Lot 4 that is
129.00 feet North of the Southeast corner; thence West to a point on the West side
of said Lot 4.
c
D. R
QV WAS�,,
Q)
C)
17
IST
LAO
a
AU—MORIZED
FOR
C 0 P, 1) 1 N G
C1.1 F E )MONDS
y
Pa e Of
CITY OF EDM-ONDS
P- W. DEPT. ENGIN�EERING DIV.
.EXAMINED
(7) BY
REMARKS
� 4F
03 10-0 161
vu
HE
DIVISION OF THIS PROPERTY SUBJECT
TO THE CONDIT iS SET FORTH IN CITY OF EDMONDS'.-., Pg. No. 2
RECORD OF SHORI"SUBDIV ILE #S-28-79. FILE NUMBER
4J
c) T MAP
lop e "I
Nr . I �� t _-k
'6L 5 e- M e)) t
ra heet may be s e fo , th"e? M ovided it is not larger than x 14"
SuP8 L -
114
in size aniNsufficient sp is a
yac rttykfor inclusion of the certific ion appear-
L
ing be]
Q
4-
?: Legend: o�e"WL4"5fee I
roJ vvith cap
10. 0 0
MonLAMent 4-
e Men t a I
w 1,q
:1`2378360
R 32.7 It \Z,
-9
-5 8 80 3 92 7` >
- I q2- 41
01
4P 1000080 and:W-10006831
CS)
C IWa te r-0
easenit
��W73'42'45'/E
2% 76 If f �2
N 2 ?_ 11 210 10 q W
7 7, 2
E W
CCC55 an Iteirl
9 22 06 C) me tq
7 1 _'9 -0;f
,�f , uf -;ec, e5rntO I
8 1
N8 30 30
Q11)) E! X,
Ln \x
�a -4 -25--
1�1 '15 1 \A- L)
V\ 0� 37
cq N 8 4 -3'0 2 :A-
Cn
-co Ln
Z 5ide se-Wer
e a 5 e M e- n -k >
M
0)
�_5ide fie-wer
en se me nt
2
3
m
4)
17 952 f
LLJ
1
I
3-
)a 59) f +2
�J_ 16-) 70S f +a
Cn
4-
00
0`
100
/00.00
N8 8"
If 52 1 "E
Te r Mar laqLh Sf, S.W.
ho iiot wri r(� below this ii-ne N W 16 72 7 IV 84E W, M,
- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I hereby certify that this short subdivision complies with the conditions as set forth
in the Snohomish COUnty Short Subdivision Code, Title 20, and is approved this
dav (if 19_, subject to recording with the Auditor of
Snoliontish COUnty and under the conditions set forth in the attached Declaration of Short
�DMORDS 8103100161
P. W. DEPT� ENGINEERLNG DIV,
EXAMIRED A.UTIJOR.IZED
BY ZZWZ/_DATE.Z_/ /
FOR
(Director of Planning)
PZISCO�,'])Y�JG
C I
F_' 17 11 1,,1
S
By
P ac 7, e !'VOL V02 PAGE
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 27, 1999
To: Building Permit No,980882
From: Kate
Subject: Legal N
Garage
th
There is an existing legal non -conforming garage at 18122 84 Avenue W. Attached to this
document is verification that the subject garage existed prior to 1979 when S-28-79 was
approved. The subject garage can also be seen on the.approved lot line adjustment document
between Tract A and B at 18112 85 Ih Avenue W.
The existing garage is a legal non -conforming building in conformance with the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17.40.020 (Non -conforming buildings). A
legal non -conforming building is defined as a building that once met the bulk zoning standards
and the site development standards applicable to its construction, but is no longer conforming do
to the enactment or amendment of the zoning ordinance or due to annexation into the City of
Edmonds.
City of Edmonds cza Planning Division
I hereby certify that this short subdivision complies
iii the Snohomish CCUnty Short Subdivision Code, Title
day of
,"I'MIMIlliSh County and under
sub�t* ' '
L' 'W '6 P"LD M 0 N.D S
P.W. DEPT. ENGINEEI.-UNG QJ;W..
EXAMINED
BY D A 1
f _�'L h 1. A I I I � S -0-1
all
.—P 19_, subject to
the conditions set forth in
8103100161
AU-111-10RIZED
FOIZ. -
with the conditions as set forth
20, and is approved this
recording with the Auditor of
the attached Declaration of ShorL
(Director of Planning)
'i 1 Ds
0
:7
'! VOL rIGA2 PA'U' E 57
I
NOV 3 1998 GRADING
ft2
CUT AREA:,5071.10
@ AVERAGE OF 2.3,�
DEPTH = 11664 Cd FT
OR 432 CU YA S
FILTER FENCE
EXIOTING CONTOURO
PROPO5E1) CONTOUR5
—1
0
w
75
70
3%
LOT AREA: 22903 SO FT 4.voO
HOUSE & GARAGE AREA:-.��S�SO FT
LONG DRIVEWAY AREA : 1233 SO FT
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 4741 SO FT 62-33
SEE LOVELL-SAUER LAND & ASSOCIATES, INC.
REPORT ATTACHED.
(2) 2411 TRENCHES,
EACH TRENCH 46 FEET IN LENGTH
1+3 A-e'.'Deep
2" CONDUIT FOR POWER CA13LE
TEMP. EROSION CONTROL
FABRIC FENCE , 99
to 41
EXISTING ASPHALT
ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---
CONNECT ALL
ol
A:3 1105�-
9;rr,-7 al r+2
L /xx�
CUT AREA
C.c
3034 Pvc\
WATER &
SEWER
EASMT
10' 13UFFER +
17`�
15' 5ET13A,,-K
T:7'B�7;'
10 FIF SET BACK LINE
co
80
F_ Z
10 r IiTB7t-I* 6NF,
60-� ;z ---------
59.90 6d 65' 70' 72.55
0 9�
78.81
ADS
(bW)
BASIN #
V=20'
UTILITY POLE
END OF
F.H. DnAMIAI
"I I
"ADS
BASIN Ce'
C.
C uj
PT,
5
EXI STUD >
864.00 ft 2
30
GAR.
co
FUTURE
FK)USE
!ACCEPTABLEtlGHTLINE MATERI L
1�'o
2 ADS
1872.00 ft 4 PV(
Ic
SDR 35 STM D3034)
10FTSETBACKLINE
I
I _21 b
co C6
L-0 In
- 5CALE: 1" = 20'-0"
APPROVED
ri)
0
U
0
c)
00
<
4-1
<
T-
00
V_
(s)
<
Lli
LJJ __j
("'\ C)
w
0
z
?15 6t
w
zlcr R
10/29/98
REVISIONS
GENERALNOTES
1. All work and materialo ohall be in accordance, with City of Edmondo 5tandardo
and Opecificationo, and Waohinoton 5tatc Department, of Tranoportation 1991 5tandard o
5pecificatlono for road, bridge and municipal conotructlon.
61 p I an oradino I
2. Temporary croolon/occilmontation control rricaoureo rhall be Implemente r or to y <,-*
or extenolve land clearing. There facilitloo ohall be satlofactorily maintained until conotruction
lo completed and the potential for oroolon ir minimal.
3. All pipe rhall be placed on otable earth, or If in the opinion of the City Engineer, the exiotino
foundation lo uneatl6factory, then the unoultable material ohall be excavated and the voId7__1
backfilled with a free draining granular material, free of debrio and clay.
STORM SYSTEM R=25, MIN.
4. All orator, (inlet and catch baoin) ohall be dcpr000ed 0.1 foot below pavement; orade.
All catch baolne to be type I umlervo otherwiec noted.
The, contractor ohall be rooponolble for adjuotino all manhole, inlet, and catch baoin framoo
and oratoo to oradejuot prior to pouring of curbo and paving. All catch baoino with a
It 1, -, 65 feet to the flowline ohall be a Type 11 C15. All structureo located outride of the
12" MIN.
,V- 8" QUARRY 5PAL5
706
0
�O
k� 0"If
-C'
4.�
. . . . . . . . . . .
S014 S'q/
4"'
s
b:�t� s
riaht-of-wav ohall ha locking Ildo. FROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRE55/ EGKE!5!5 AREA
Catch baoin frame and grate ohall be Olympic Foundry part; No. 5M 50G, Herringbone
pattern; part No. 5M 52, thru-rurb Inlet, part No. Orn 44, rolled curb type; or other
approvel equal; or ao othcrwiec called for on the plano.
5. 5tormwator rotention/dotention facilitleo muot be conotructed and Maintained In
accordance with City of Edmondo requiremcnto.
6. All road fillo ohall be. compacted to a minimum of 95% of maximum donoity when tooted
uoino the modified Proctor toot. Compaction ohall be accompliohed in accordance with
5ection 2-03.3(14)C, Method L3 or C.
7. If out and fill eloper exceed a maximum of one foot horizontal to two feet vertical,
a rock or concrete retaining wall will be required.
Approximate locationo of oxieting utilitler, have. been obtained from available recordo
and are ohown for convenience. The contractor ohall be reoporolble for verifying the location
of all exiotine utilitloo whether ohown or not. The contractor ohall call the Utility Locator
5ervice, 1-800-424-5555. two working dayo prior to any cometruction.
9. The contractor ohall take all neccooary precautiono for the oafety of employceo on the,
project and ohall comply with all applicable proviolono of Federal, 5tatc, and Municipal oafety
lawo and building coder, He ohall erect and properly maintain, at all timer, ar, required 17Y the
conditiono and proorcor of the work, all necor7oary oafoouardo for protection of workmen and
the public; ohall poet danger olono warning againot known or unuoual hazardo; and he ohall
deolonate a reoporolble member of We organization on the. conotruction olto whore duty ohall be
the prevention of accidento.
10. The contractor ohall be rooponolble for maintaining and repairing aophalt and gravel ourfacco
diaturbed aq a reoult of thlo conotruction until they are accepted by the Public Worko Department
of the city.
TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES
1. Maintain natural vegetation for olit control where p000lble.
2. Temporary oroelon occlImentation control facilitice ohall be con6tructed by placing olltatiOm
control filtcro around owaler, (natural or mammadc) and ohall i7c maintained in a oatirfactory
condition until ouch time that land clearing andlor conotruction of permanent draina0e facilitlec,
are completed and operational. Fadlitior, ohall then be, removed and the olto reotored to the original
or final derlen condition.
3. Aq conotruction progreroco and expected ocaoonal conditiono dictate, more elltation control
facilltior, may be required to inoure complete oiltation control of thir, property. Therefore, luring the
course of conotruction, It ohall be the obligation of the contractor to addreoir any new corlditiono that,
may be. created by We activitlao an i to provide additional facilitleo, ao may be riecded.
E5C Minimum Requirement - Otablizatiom of Exp000d Arcao. All ooilo expooed by land dloturNno
activitico ohall be otaliblized by oultabIc application of 13MP9, including, but not limited to, 6061
hydroocedirio, or other vegetation, plaoltic covering, or mulching. All I3MPr ohall be. eclooted,
deoloned and maintained in accordance with the Manual. The expooed oollo shall be otabilized
according to an approved timetaft. (Typically, no oollo ohall remain expoacd for more than two (2)
dayo from October 1 through April 30 and no more than oeven (7) daye, from May 1 through
5eptember 30)
T P01QARy
EM Flm
ROAD ENTRANCE DET/
C"O'NSTRUC"TION SEQUENCE.
1. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IN5TALLED
2. TEMPORARY ROAWAPPROACH
3. EXCAVATION
4. PRAINAGE5Y5TEM & 5ANITARY 5EWER IN5TALLED
6. FOUNDATION
0. DRIVEWAY
41 - 0" 2X2 PF
OR DETTER
FILTER FADRIC
2" - W'
TOP OF 5WALE QUARRY
. . . . . . . . . . . . 5PALL�\
FILTER FAI3Rk 2X2 PF
JZ&YI OR 13ETTER
7/6" WA5HEV
GRAVEL
RON
--)N-
ADS BASIN #1\ ADS BASIN #3
RIM: 100.04 RIM: 100.06 ADS BASIN #2
-99A-8: :RIM:- 1-00.08 ........... ...........
................ 98-.44 .................. IE: . . ..............................
.................... -IF .......... ......... ......
................................................. -1 E: - 98-.44 ....................
102
100* .... ........
..... ......................... I .............................. ......
9 8'
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
......... 4. 46LN-* FT OP 4"'PVC PERF.- @ --0% ....................... WLN FTOF.*4" PVC PERF. @ "0%*
94 ............. ........................................ -
........................................ ------------- -------
..........................
............ ........
92 ................................
90 ------------------ -----------------------------------
..................................................
88 ......... * ......
.............................. .............
86 * ' * --------------------
............................................
.............................
84- .................. * --------
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
................................................................................
................................................................................
................................................................................
0" HRI'
SYSTto�:M PROFILE 11" == 1100'- 0" VEF'
36.
y-liCia. I Ii Ii -
7
13URY FILTER FA13RIC k 4- o-, ac DURY 130TTOM OF FILTER
IN GKAVEL-LINEP TRENCH /1 FADRIC IN TRENCH
FILTER FENCE DETAILNO 5CALE
CALL 48 HOURS
BEFORE YOU DIG
1-800-424-5555
CONNECTALL
DOWNSPrO. UTS TO
DENTENTION SYSTEry
KING COUNTYO WASHING'TON, SURPACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
FXGURE4SAA ROOF DOWNSPOUT INFILTRATION SYSTEMS
WE- AAA df f4 L4ft#4r=,
L
"'V
artzrow Rre-
.4
-1 A
"b
9COMIA
a;_PC%rI"r- Vti-:-_%4
.1 No
0��WAhOIAW4
k10
tole.)
VA rig&_
tj�U�je4az4r W41 a
L
plip
ITI. A!
MAW it* ow-1tv
veto U I
APPP J.
'�a D P�,'
A't�jt�'J_J
b qw
0
0 Q
Q)
'4
FIE
20
4-:1
�D
C)
d)
cy)
Z
cri
o
117-
<
Z
o
U
Q)
co
i
,.-
LLI
Q-)
Z <
Z LU
LU
W
Z
W
Z CC
10/29/98
REVISIONS
4,vblra�rl . LO-1
8661 9 - AON
allolaff
lo