18310 SUNSET WAY.PDF1111111111 lill
13397
18310 SUNSET WAY
I S �) 0 6L) ns(?+-
RAM Engineering CITYCOPY
Memorandum
TO: JoAnne Zulauf Date: August 12, 2015
City of Edmonds
Engineering Division RECEIVED
From: Rob Long, PE AUG 14 2015
RAM Engineering DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Subject: Murata Short Plat- Lat 3 (aka RTC/, LLC Short AN UNN20130059)
Drainage Memo
RAM Job No. 15-025
This memo provides the design analysis of the stormwater drainage control system for Lot 3 of the Murata Short Plat.
The initial short plat site development included a detention tank system for a shared driveway and an allocation of
impervious surface for the house construction on Lot 3. The current owner the Murata SP lots is requesting a
reallocation (memo attached) of the lot impervious surface (controlled by the plat detention tank) to accommodate a
new house on Lot 2. The revised allocation (controlled by plat detention tank) and the proposed new impervious
(controlled by an onsite Lot 3 infiltration system) is summarized below:
Lot 3 Impervious Surface (see attached exhibit):
2,150 sf (Lot 3 house)
+ 2,774 s (Shared driveway for lots 2 and 3 located on Lot 3's panhandle)
4,924 sf (Impervious to Short Plat detention tank)
2,500 sf (Lot 3 Infiltration System Area)
An infiltration drywell is proposed on Lot 3 to control the additional 2,500 sf of impervious area. A site specific 0.5 in/hr
design infiltration rate was determined by the geotechnical engineer (see attached letter). The stormwater infiltration
drywell has been sized using the City of Edmonds Simplified Sizing Tables (handout #E72-B). The below tables provide
the sizing information for the infiltration drywell systems.
Project Infiltration Dry Well Sizing Summary:
Lot 3 Infiltration Trench Impervious Area =
2,500 sf
Required 6' Deep Drywell Area (2,500 sf x 0.048)'
120 sf
Provided Drywell area (4' x 30')
120 sf
Lot 3 Infiltration Drywell. 30 ft. long x 4 ft. wide x 6 ft. deep (wash drain rock)
1. 4.8% impervious surface sizingfactorper Edmonds simplified sizing charts (with 0.5 inlhrsoils)
Sizing Factors per Edmond's Handout,#E728:
Sizing Factor
(C1 orcontribUting
Native Soil Desioll m1perviousarea)
C -
Infiltration Rate Category Category
BMP Facility Overflow Deptli (inclies/liour) I Sites, 1 2 Sites h Sizing EqUation
Dryvvell
4 foot depth
0.5
6.2%
6.2%
Drywell Area (square feet) =
2.0
3.0%
3.1%
Impervious Area �sqttare feet) x
Sizing Factor (%)/100
6 foot deptlil
4.7%
8 %
2.0
2.4%
2.5%
Drywell Design Criteria per Edmond's Handout #E72B:
Design Criteria for All BINIPs
These BMPS shall not be used in:
- The North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA) 3
- Uporadient (east) of tile ESLHA
- III a Landslide Hazard Area'I
- Within 5 feet of property lines and easements
- Within 10 feet from underground storage tanks
g C
- Within 50 feet from proposed or existin-septic systems or drain fields.
- Where tile depth to tile top or tile seasonal groundwater level is less than I foot from the bottom of tile
facility.
Tile BNIP must meet (lie following setback requirements from buildings:
C 4--
- if runoff is from -.in area less than 5,006 square feet. setback is 5 feet from a structure without a
basement and 10 feet for a structure with a basement.
- If runoff is from all area greater than or equal to 5.000 square feet. a structure shall not intersect
with a I Horizontal: I Vertical slope from (lie bottom edge of the facility. Minimum 5 feet from a
Z:
structure without I basement and 10 feet for -,I structure with a basement.
0 An overflow path must be specified such that runoff above tile facility*s design capacity does not cause:
C�
- Floodin- of it building or ernergencyaccess
- Erosion or downstream sedimentation
- Slope failure.
Drywell
• Drywell area shall be determined using, the simplified sizing method.
• The infiltration rate used to determine tile required area shall be tile design, or-Iong-term." rate and must be
calculated usino correction factors per the Ecology Manual.
• Minimum aggregale depth before overflow shall be its specified (4 or 6 feet).
OL Z�
• Drywell aggregate shall have it minimum void volume of 30 percent (I - 1/2 to 1-3/4 inch washed rock).
C!� C�
8112-11!5
Attachments:
A. Lot 3 Impervious Surface Allocation Exhibit, August 12, 2015 (1 page)
B. Murata Short Plat Impervious Surface Allocation Memo, August 11, 2015 (4 pages)
C. Geotechnical Soils Infiltration Letter, July 31, 2015 (9 pages)
RAM Engineering 16531 13t'Ave W, Suite A108 Lynnwood WA 98037 (425) 678-6960 RAMengineeringinc.com
2,150 sf (Lot 3 house)
+ 2,774 s (Shared driveway for lots 2 and 3 located on Lot Ts panhandle)
4,924 sf (Impervious to Short Plat detention tank)
2,500 sf (Lot 3 Infiltration System Area) -------------------
---------- ---------- ------ ----------- N�\ If
711 7
11
4,
L -- ---
If If 11 1
W If
131
2,50 sf -4
if
42
if
*77777� LU
If
IN
z
r
2,150 sf]
I I
4;1 A I
7,
-- --------------------------------- r ----------- ------------- -------
2,
---------- ---- E_7�74�s .............. ------------- ---------- ------------------
------------- -------
Q, 'j, N 71
r --------------- Murata Short Plat- Lot 3
(oka RTC/, LLC Short Plat, PLN 20130059)
Lot 3 Impervious Surface Exhibit
August 12, 2015
RAM Job No. 15-025
RAM Engineering
Memorandum
To: JoAnne Zulauf Date: August 11, 2015
City of Edmonds
Engineering Division
From: Rob Long, PE
RAM Engineering
Subject: Murata Short Plat (aka RTC/, LLC Short Plat, PLN20130059)
Impervious Surface Allocation
RAM Job No. 15-025
Select Homes, the current owners of the Murata Short Plat is requesting to reallocate the allowable impervious surface
for each individual lot of the plat. The current approved allocation (see March 25, 2015 memo) per the City of Edmonds
and the proposed revised allocations area as follows:
March 25. 2015 ImDervious Allocation:
Lot 1: 4,657 sf
Lot 2: 972 sf
Lot 3: 5,091 sf
Shared Driveway Area on Lot 3: 2,774s
13,494 sf
The r)ror)osed revised imoervious allocation:
Lot 1: 4,670 sf
Lot 2: 3,900 sf
Lot 3: 4,924 sf (2,150 portion of lot 3 house + 2,774 shared driveway for lots 2 and 3)
13,494 sf
Additional impervious surface for lot 3 is proposed. A separate system installed on lot 3 (to control the additional
impervious surface) will not be allowed to connect to the existing plat storm tank system. The design and approval for
the additional private lot 3 system shall be submitted with the lot 3 building permit application under separate cover.
An updated impervious surface area exhibit is attached for reference.
8/////n
RAM Engineering 1653113 1h Ave W, Suite A108 Lynnwood WA 98037 (425) 678-6960 RAMengineeringinc.com
Lot 1: 4,670 sf
Lot 2: 3,900 sf V
Lot 3: 4,924 sf (2,150 portion of lot 3 house + 2,774 shared driveway for lots 2 and 3)
I Total: 13,494 sf -------------------
It 11
----------- ---------
----------
I f
P
'41
.1 r
'ipp
177
4"
11 it
j
------ -- 3,900 sf
L
mom I'll
670 Sf
f
1/'T
TO BE CONTROLLED BY
� A\
4 -1-SI\
ON -SITE LOT 3 SYSTEM
i3:
17
LU
Ir
\-I- T
jr '$1 r,"
V'.7
U)
A"Y'
2�=
- - - - - - - - - -
------- ------------------ --
------------------------ r ----------- - -------------
0
T_
- ------------ ---------- -----------------
----------- --------
r --------------- Murata Short Plat
(aka RTC/, LLC Short Plat, PLN 20130059)
Impervious Surface Allocation
August 11, 2015
RAM Job No. 15-025
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 25, 2015
To: JoAnne Zulauf
City of Ed.monds
From: Ken McIntyre, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: Murata Short Plat
Addendum to Drainage Report dated 10/30/14
SDA PROJECT NUMBER 346-001-14
This memo is provided as an addendum to the approved drainage report for the Murata Short Plat,
which was issued on October 30, 2014, and subsequently approved. This memo is provided to clarify
the amount of impervious surface area available on each individual lot, for benefit of the building
designer.
The approved drainage report accounted for a total of 0.31 acres of new impervious surface on. the
project. The building designer is currently proposing the following new impervious surface area on
each lot:
Lot #1:
4,657 sf
Lot #2:
972 sf
Lot #3:
5,091 sf
Access Tract: 2,774 sf ,
Total: 13,494 sf (0-31 ac)
Lot Ws 1 & 3 are proposing more impervious area than was proposed in the original design. Lot #2
contains an existing building that was accommodated into the original storm drainage design.
However, this building existed prior to 1977, and is considered to be "non -regulated impervious surface
area", as defined in Edmonds Municipal Code. The 972 square feet of impervious surface proposed on
Lot #2 represents a new detached garage and driveway area. The currently proposed access tract is
the same as was'proposed in the previous design. A figure has been provided along with this memo to
graphically represent the new impervious surface area.
Al
v
16
oil, S T
6-
03-25-15
MAR 25 26ij
DUILDING DEPAW-MEt'-,
CITY OF 1110MONDS
1724 W. Marine View Drive; Suite 140 P:'425.486.6533
SDA Everett. WA 98201 F: 425.486.6593
LOT#11SUMMARY:
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 4,657 SF
101
LOT #2 SUMMARY:
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 972 SF
V)
9
0
N
m
R
H
1A
1114
0
-T
LOT #3 SUMMARY:
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA = 5.091 SIF
ACCESS TRACT SUMMARY:
IMPERVIOUS PVMT/DRIVEWAY AREA = 2,774 SF
N
KJM
0 50 [Now
1 "=50' lTTli02SiQ
Scale Feet MOOWI-1.4
W-1-1— S—fnc.. 7015-03-75.11— 11.17
So
1.1"Zol""21301.0100i r"a
sloz riz Pw
ionsau
MURATA
SHORT PLAT
NEW IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE SUMMARY shost;
LIU & ASSOCIATES9 INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Engineering Geology Earth Science
Mr. Gary Klick
Select Homes
16531 — 13th Avenue, Suite A107
Lynnwood, WA 98037
Dear Mr. Klick:
Subject: In -Situ Infiltration Test
Single -Family Residence
183xx Sunset Way
Edmonds, Washington
L&A Job No. 13 -116
July 31, 2015
INTRODUCTION
We previously performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation for a 3-lot plat, and on
one of the lots - Lot 3, the subject residence is to be constructed. That investigation is
based on two test holes hand -dug on the project site. Our findings of the site conditions
and preliminary geotechnical recommendations were presented in a report titled
"Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, 3-Lot Plat, 18310 Sunset Way, Edmonds,
Washington," dated December 16, 2013, (hereinafter referred to as 12/16/2013 Report).
Onsite storm disposal by infiltration is considered for the subject residence of this report.
At your request, we have conducted an in -situ infiltration test on the west side of Lot 3 to
determine the infiltration rate in the stormwater disposal area. Presented in this report is
the test result and our recommendations.
19213 Kenlake Place NE - Kenmore, Washington 98028
Phone (425) 483-9134 - Fax (425) 486-2746
July 31, 2015
Infiltration Test - Single -Family Residence
L&A Job No. 13 -116
Page 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The general location of the residence is shown on Plate 1. Subsurface conditions of Lot 3
had been explored in our previous investigation with one hand -dug test hole, TH-1, the
log of which is presented in the 12/16/2013 Report. This test hole, dug to 5.0 feet deep,
encountered 14 inches of topsoil, 1.8 feet of brown to light -brown, medium -dense, silty
fine sand with trace gravel, then into a deposit of brown -gray, dense, silty fine sand with
trace to some gravel which appears to of advance outwash deposit.
For the infiltration test, subsurface conditions of the stormwater disposal area of Lot 3
were explored with a backhoe test pit (Test Pit 1) excavated to 10.0 deep. The location
and the log of this test pit are presented on Plate 2 and 4 attached hereto. This test pit
encountered 2.5 feet of loose fill, 4.5 feet of light -brown to light -gray, very -dense, silty
fine sand with trace to some gravel and occasional cobble (appears to be glacial till), 1.5
feet of light -brown, dense, gravelly, silty, fine to medium sand, then into a light -brown to
light -gray, very -stiff, clayey silt soil to the depthexplored. Groundwater was encountered
by the test pit. It is the layer of light -brown, gravelly, silty, fine to medium sand layer at
depth from 7.0 to 8.5 feet that was targeted for the in -situ infiltration test.
IN -SITU INFILTRATION TEST
Stormwater Management Manual
The in -situ infiltration test was conducted in accordance with the requirements and
procedure outlined in Washington State Department of Ecology 2012 Stormwater
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
July 31, 2015
Infiltration Test - Single -Family Residence
L&A Job No. 13 -116
Page 3
Management Manual for Western Washingt to determine infiltration rate of the
targeted soil stratum.
Test Pit and Subsurface Condition
The in -situ infiltration test was completed on July 21, 2015. The location of the
infiltration test, IT-1, is shown on Plate 2. The test pit was excavated into a light -brown,
gravelly, silty, fine to medium sand. Groundwater was not encountered by the infiltration
test pit. Dimensions of the test pit and soil condition at bottom of the test pit are
presented in the table below:
TEST PIT SIZE AND SOIL CONDITION
Test
Pit
Description of Soil
No.
Size
at Bottom of Test Pit
IT-1
6.33'x 7.83'
Light -brown, gravelly, silty,
x 7.63' deep
fine to medium SAND
Infiltration Test Procedure
The infiltration test pit was filled with water to at about 20 inches deep for hours to soak
the soil underneath the pit. Clear tap water was used in the test. The infiltration test was
then conducted in the pit by falling head method with the initial water level at about 18
inches deep. A steel cross bar is affixed on top of the pit and water levels from the bar
were measured in the beginning and at the end of a one -hour period. The initial
infiltration rate, K,at inifial, in inches per hour (iph), was thus determined. The result of the
infiltration test is presented in the table below:
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
D
July 31, 2015
Infiltration Test - Single -Family Residence
L&A Job No. 13-116
Page 4
INFILTRATION
TEST RESULT
Test
No.
'Water Level
Elapsed
Time, Hr.
Infiltration
Rate, Ksat initial
In./Hr.
Infiltration
b
Rate, Ksat
In./Hr.
Begin
End
IT-1
62.25
64.625
1.00
2.375
0.689
a Measured from a steel bar affixed on top of test pit
b Ksat ,= CFT X Ksat inib.1 , where CFT = CF, x Ut x CFm
As shown in the equation above, the Ksat initial value determined by the infiltration test is to
be modified according correction factors include: site variability and number of locations
tested (CFv), uncertainty of test method. (CF,), and degree of influent control to prevent
siltation and bio-buildup (CF .. ), are to be applied on Ksat initial values to get the design
infiltration rate, Ksg. According Table 3.3.1 of the DOE Manual, CFv = 0.33 to 1.0, CF, =
0.5 for small scale test, and CF. = 0.9. Use- A'middle value 0.65 for CF, thus, CFT =
(0.65) (0.5) (0.9) = 0.29. The Ksat value for the infiltration test was thus calculated and
shown in the table above.
RECOMMENDATIONS
An infiltration trench is to be installed in the stormwater disposal area on the west side of
Lot 3 to dispose stormwater. The bottom of the infiltration trench should be excavated at
least 6 inches into the target soil layer of light -brown, gravelly, silty, fine to medium sand.
Based on the above test result, we recommend a design infiltration rate of 0.5 iph be used
for calculating the amount of stormwater that can seep into bottom of the trench.
LIU & ASSOCIATES.) INC.
July 31, 2015
Infiltration Test - Single -Family Residence
L&A Job No. 13-116
Page 5
LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared for the specific application to the subject residence for the
exclusive use by Select Homes and its associates, representatives, consultants and
contractors. The conclusions and interpretations in this report, however, should not be
construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. The scope of this report does not
include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are
not intended to direct the contract&s methods, techniques, sequences or procedures,
except as specifically described in this report for design considerations.
Our recommendation of the design soil infiltration rate is based on the geologic and soil
conditions encountered by the test pit excavated in the stormwater disposal area of Lot 3,
the infiltration test result, and our experience and engineering judgment. The conclusion
and recommendation are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with the
level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently
practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty, expressed or implied, is
made.
The actual subsurface conditions of the stormwater disposal area may vary from those
encountered by the test pit excavated in the area. The nature and extent of such variations
may not become evident until construction starts. If variations appear then, we should be
retained to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report, and to verify or modify them
in writing prior to proceeding further with the construction of the infiltration trench. Soil
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
July 31, 2015
Infiltration Test - Single -Family Residence
L&A lob No. 13-116
Page 6
condition at bottom and construction of the infiltration trench should be observed and
verified by a geotechnical engineer.
CLOSURE
We are pleased to be of service to you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you
have questions regarding this report or need ftirther consultation.
Plates 1, 2 and 4 attached
Yours very truly,
LIU SOCI S, INC.
IJ
q : I
(Juji I I
J. S. (Juli ) Liu, Ph.D., P.E.
Consulting Geotechnical Engineer
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
7
FREDERICK PL
,;jT
vrnlIN7)
I 9TH PL
MQ t
0
2 s
7� 1 I
I RX
PROAC T
SITE 890
P.
191ST
L sw
al
t, >.
3.
�No Pk _'N
IL Sw
ia If
F�! L-
-IR4TH2%0 -ZT
;tf
Q)
it
�i,sf:
4 HL17TR
IL sw
85TH
PL �W
PL SW
+186THST
185TH Sm
F7,
SW
I ST SW
PK
186TH L S�
Will
J�M
PL SW L87
El
ll'�)
ST
ST sw :3C
188TH
W-12 L91
Sw"
sw
189TH 5 sw
B
ER
W ER
CHERR
KE PL
ST
19 H
CD
<
190TH
ST SW[
9
cli
1191ST
191ST ST
10
192ND ST
sw
FOREST
OEL4 11,
W.,
DR
PL
TH
0,
t
Pl.
196
CID
SS T
sT
sli
196TH
POET' PU ET
D ST Sw
8600
Wy
7TH
19M
'gi sw
'HIND WEWLAND
wy..
cli
t, rnmnm
' ;CF DR KNE
1000 1
ST .
ST SW
ST
mpt
UNDERWATER
0
--PARK,
Mi-AIN
LN I PL ;'� , LA
200TH
83�O
BRACKETTS
.
DR
wy. ALM
CAROL
CASCKDE MIST I
ISIERRA
202NO
LANDING
BEACH
bf AM—
GLEN
ADR
ST L SIERRA ST 20M p
<
20M PLSW
EN ST <
ZMAD ST SW
Z pt 203RD PL SW
2(
LEY 24 §.st
OD MTH ST Sd
s Sw :x
7s
rPRAM197
law.
HILL. PKO;-'
ST Sw
206TH.
FS
700 ul ;
L L �il-"STI:
_F07TH
ST�SWJ.
.
'IN
ST '12
OR
to 7 C\j
NZ,
'. . Co
26
3 , I , ` M
DAYTON IL V
4Q0:
--eel -
sw, 20M PL
'209�i k". tsw,i
�-MAPLE �T
,:5
mk.,
0
ff
VICINITY MAP
LIU & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3-LOT PLAT
18310 SUNSET WAY
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
Geotechnical Engineedng - Engineedng Geology - Earth Science
r JOB NO. 13-116
1 DATE 12/15/20131
PLATE77_771 71
04
z
CL
z
0 z
0
I EX. ACCESS
EASEMENT F. NO.
TRACT A 'Ok LF) Q14
199909Z cv)
294. l (0- ST 0
om
2�2.4`52.; ii)72�-
a" I — — N
tj SU'44't)o" 'N al
D!O"S,w LIJ U) LLj
0 CL W -a
c
7 E m ww
7 k
7 ------------
-- ---- -- --- 4 --- i
VP
A- Zl"-
. I — —/ EX. 'aY
FV"U'4CRW'P" ; 101 orTI)" Fmw
ww� fur lr 'I'M — �r all
Hall EX.
5a" --mlo 0 c6 a
owl
u —j T— Z
(L 0
--2
Y RESIDENCE 14 In I
T FLOO 300. 1 ------
KA� MEN IR 292.658 .
R"
ft"4" -7 co LU
12.224 #%IL
C*1
a
C14
C
C]]
ui
AhE FR EX. 0
12.ODD 24111 Ha
U)
1 8.725- EX YD
5.5-18 \NEW
<
V
GAR
SFk A 2 E olum
21* 1 -V)
E)aSTtNq
U)
D
z
Y\,
T
vmlr� K.L co
EIE k. T 12" - K.'
5t .0 - — \ 1� LLI
21
cy)
2—NEW 1* 'A
K. 3PI R 32* METERS AMC
w SERVICES 0
V, W—X W co
-L:p nu
m
-- -- -- ----
I � � �.-w, &
or CBWH WIM
CTOR
77 STm,WATM DETENTION TOP 2913
S�., E.sT f,`77.51�(R 1972) FOR SHARED MVEWAY, INV 2MO
a-. 7'34' ',Y (DESC.) it .1 AL
AND J — — — — — — — — -
INV 288.0 277.32'(SP) r
1 0 w
APPROXIMATE z
LOCATION 22.3 m
EXISTING —
A R
AGE/SHED
LU
co
01
Logged By: JSL
TEST PIT NO. 1
Date: 7/21/2015
Ground El.
Depth
ft.
USCS
CLASS.
Soil Description
Sample
No.
W
%
Other
Test
OL
Dark -brown, loose, organic, silty fine SAND, with roots and wood
debris, slightly moist (FILL)
2
3
------------------------------------------
Sm
Light -brown to light -gray, very -dense, silty fine SAND, trace to
some gravel, occasional cobble, moist (Till like)
4
5
6
7
...........................................
Sm
Light -brown, dense, gravelly, silty, fine to medium SAND, moist
8 —
9
------------------------------------------
IVIL
Light -brown to light -gray, very -stiff, clayey SILT, moist
10
11
Test pit terminated at 10.0 ft; groundwater not encountered.
12
TEST PIT NO.
Logged By: JSL Date:
Ground El.
Depth
ft.
USCS
CLASS.
Soil Description
Sample
No.
w
%
Other
Test
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LIU & ASSOCLATES, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering - Engineering Geology - Earth Science
TEST PIT LOGS
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
183xx SUNSET WAY
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
JOB NO. PLATE 4
City of Edmonds
Critical Area Notice of Decision
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Gelez,�- XAne.,&�.' =nc-
Critical Area File #:
Permit Number:
C,RAQQV5f=J-J
16LJ>20160992
Site Location:
Parcel Number:
.
IVS10, SL-^SeA-
a-+ 0 q I to 0110 19100
Project Descr iption:
I
Ne4p
F] Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
I . There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer.
2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or
23.80.040.
3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
XErosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
f-I Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
I The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
on or off the development proposal site;
3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40. 110. Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical ftinctions and values; and
6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. '
F-I Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria -in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
ire -.A maclq—AA-� 12-/ 1
Reviewer - - "-3 �ignatu�re��� Date '
Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the
requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 1211612010
NW 114, NW 114, SEC 18, TWP 27N, RGE 4E, W.M.
LOT 2 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
(CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLA T FILE NO. PL N20130059)
TREE PROTECTION MEASURES
a--_
J�
7
RMZ_,_ 411A
4,*i*.:,�
d d
W --A."
—s "m
CONSTRUC77ON SEQUENCE
CAll =1
V� 11 Al 1,
I—El"I
7. Z=
TZ.
IA S,=�
,: � lj7,=,�
=1=4
UTILITY PURVEYORS
MEEMWAEN�
nm
m
N 131-11C
It �_5 1, � M�Z
V.:
.A
VICINITYMAP
RAM
E GINEERING, INC
LEGAL DESCRIPTION I I I I 1 1 1 1 1
IT.
BASIS OF BEARINGS
BENCHMARK
WAIF—
, 0m
CWL ENGINEER
wc,
u
7
ACCESS ROAD
41
7
------------------
IMPERVIOUS AREAS B ILDNG HEIGHT SHEET INDEX My COPI
0 ��. IRA I7Q C LCULA TONS JAEGI I SP-01 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUB
PAW -.7 2 GN-Gf GENERAL NOTES & DETAILS NOV,j 20;5
2 A GRADING QUANTITIES
7 IT
=A Qo m cr 25D Cy APPRO FOR CONSTRUC770M
�LOTCOVERAGE I CITY OFEDMONDS
LOT— fA.I UTILITYNOTE 15-025
811 or 1-800-424-5555 SP-01
( %�, — - , I - Rees, OV. E D&
City of Edmonds
tp
AUG 0 6 2015 ` - , ' ( N,
Site Classification Worksheet E VIM
VELOPMENT SE VICES -*-. _0_411�
, I
Page 1 of 2 COUNTLc;? RVICES -,*C.
The project's Site Classification will dictate the specific stormwater management
requirements applicable to your site. Completing this worksheet will help determine the amount of
regulated impervious surface and whether your project falls into the classification of a Small Site
(Category I or Category 2), or a Minor Site. Please reference the Glossary (1212. 10-11), Figgres D and 10"
E, (pp. 8-9), and Examples (1212. 11-12), to assist with completion of this worksheet. somm
1) Is Permeable Pavement' Proposed For Use on this Site? Yes No
. Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 5.1
If YES, the subject area is to be considered impervious for initial site classification purposes. Include total
pen-neable pavement area in the calculation of Non -Regulated, Replaced and/or New impervious surface
areas in the table below.
2) Determine the Amount and Type of Existing & Proposed Impervious Surface for the Site
Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 2 and Fig. C
Line 1: Identify the Non -Regulated Impervious Surface Area.
Line 2: Identify the Replaced Impervious Surface Area, dividing the total between Exempt and Regulated; either or both
may be zero. Note: For project classification purposes, Replaced Impervious may only be considered exempt
under certain conditions. Refer to the Glossary and Figure D.
Line 3: Identify the New Impervious Surface Area for your project. All impervious areas created post -July 7, 1977 or
after the date of annexation into the City are regulated & should be included in this total unless they can be
categorized separately as a Replaced -Regulated area.
Line 4: Enter the sum of the total Replaced -Regulated plus the total New impervious areas.
Line 5: Identify the total area currently mitigated by an existing city -approved stormwater management system.
Line 6: Enter the sum of the value in Line 4 less the value in Line 5 to identify the total Regulated area in which
stormwater controls have not yet been applied.
Line 7: Identify the total area proposed to be mitigated through the use of Low Impact Development Techniques.
Line 8: Identify the total area proposed to be mitigated through conventional Stormwater Management Techniques.
** Provide a copy of the following table on the drainage plan sheet for the proposed project
Line
Type
Area (square feet)
1.
Non -Regulated
NONE
Exempt
egu at
2.
Replaced
ASF
3.
4.
New (Post 1977) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total Regulated Impervious Area
Mitigation required if in excess of 200
+
35854 SF
5.
6.
Total Area Mitigated by Existing Stormwater Management System(s)
Regulated Area Not Yet Mitigated
3,854 SF
0 SF
7.
Area Proposed to be Mitigated by Low Impact Development Techniques
0 SF
8.
Area Proposed to be Mitigated through Conventional SVVM Techniques
0 SF
-fiffft AK9A lPVWlrWD -190 -rflir-.
CIX* 1W ST*04WftC1L
T
(e.g. porous asphalt, porous concrete, paver blocks, concrete open celled paving grids4tr WplasticSlyattiicres'71ed with luiff or sl..�eqab -17
Revised on 310512012 E72-SWM-Erosion-Control-03.05.12.doc Page 5 of 12
of EbAl
City of Edmonds
Site Classification Worksheet
Page 2 of 2
3) Determine the Total Area of Land Disturbing Activity Lot 2 Murata Short Plat = 12,224 sf
Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 8
4) Determine the Quantity of Grading, Fill and/or. Excavation CUT=250 CY FILL=250 CY
5) Will the project convert 3/4 Acre or More of Native Vegetation to Lawn or Yes FX1 No
Landscaped Area?
6) Identify the Watershed the Existing Site Runoff Discharges to
Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 2.3
Based on Site Location and Watershed Map — Figure-C. Check aH that a121)1Y.
A. F] Direct Discharge B. FX1 Creek or Lake Basin
o Edmonds Way Basin Talbot Park B
o Puget Sound Basin
o Puget Sound Piped Basin
DETERMINE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION USING THE INFORMATION ABOVE
AND THE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION CHART (Figure B, pg 4)
FX Small Site - Category I El Small Site - Category 2 El Minor Site
Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement
Chap'ter 5 Chapter 5 Chapter 6
Revised on 310512012 E72-SWM—Erosion—Control-03.05.12.doc Page 6 of 12
Murata Short Plat Lot 2:
Murata Short Plat Lot Impervious Allocation:
Total Lot Impervious Allowed = 10,720 sf
Lot 1 = 4,716 sf
Lot 2 = 3,854 sf
Lot 3 = 2,150 sf (additional infiltration trench to be provided)
Lot 2 Area Summary:
Total Site Area = 12,224 sf
Proposed Impervious = 3,854 sf
Building Rooftop = 3,080 sf
Uncovered Patio and Walks = 146 sf sf
Uncovered Driveway = 628 sf
M7,==
--------------- % ------------
ACCESS ROAD
�7 ------------- 7 ----------
't
City of Edmonds
Critical Area Notice of Decision
Applicant:
eaI6&
Property Owner:
4e Tc—
Critical Area File #:
I
C44-Zat360:75
Permit Number:
Site Location:
J g 2,/0 wal)
Parcel Number:
Z 7 01/ /,y 0o 2- Ot koo
Project Description:
1 0/- at !X=7
/* Moo&/ � q
Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
I There will be no alteration of a -Critical Area or its required buffer.
2. The proposal. is an �Ilowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.5 0.220, and/or
23.80.040.
3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
I The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40-.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public. health, safety, or welfare
on or off the development proposal site;
3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordancewith ECDC
23.40.11.0, Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
F-1 Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
�dffavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
att.ached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in' ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
F-I Conditions. Criti cal Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
I L/s�
Reviewer Signature Date'
Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the
requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 12/16/2010
PLANNING DATA
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
t
STREET EILE
Name: KTL (t4.'e' -Z -70'1 t? C)0'2-0 �0,0
Date: ( 0 (2-0
Site Address:
Plan Check #: 20 1 �6 t-1 619
�
Project Description: c1L ro V\�H
Y/J
��C4 -
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YO/ NO)
Zoning:
Map,Page:
Corner Lot: (YES 00
Flag Lot: (YES 0
Critical Areas Determination. #: 4,e A lot Z, i.. 11'
E34Study Required �-' re, 5
waiver
SEPA Determination:
&Exempt
Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading)
0 Fee 0 Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form
Required Setbacks
Str
Sid
/0
Sle:
Regy
ActualSetbacks �cyV-�,eCt
Street: (LIO, 3 4 Side:
o�f- 2-
Side:
7 & 113'.Ks\
Re'ar:
Detached structures: �oy -2-)
Rockeries: 3 ( 104)�, 0A 4(-u
El Fences/Trellises:
El Bay Windows/ Projecting Modulation:
L?<-"\
S tairs/VeW
Height
'Datum Point: a/-(- ft
Datum Elevation: 'Z
Maximum Height Allowed: I
Actual Height:
Other
Parking Required: Z--,)- qWq
Parking Provided: 4Eq&
1 -1
Lot Area: "16-6-4 -2 � �;
�m - —
aximurn Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: 2q,-7
Lot Coverage Calculations: ---,A0U5L/ -7 46
5L
ADU Created: (YES
Subdivision: M 5- 1( 6 Z-)
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES 0
!�omments
r
J,,/J I%. q4, Fv�4,1 re 04410,� vc(/�
-7. (X-
7cl rzA/zo1�00S-9 f D'r 6 cc `Vy-
Z.5 f- & .r- Y
4 6t 't -,
c 300,C)., H
ej
Plan Review By:
Plani OV-1 UP
QUEN UY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARDE*ECKLIST
BUILDING PER111IT Rh�. #-�erl V\'W-v
(addressT (dhte)
0
Street Right -of -Way Existing--A-6-L4--(:oREQD
Z -
I
Access Easements Existing,
k REQD
p4
Utility Easement Existing '�;Jtt!7�Uj
tj REQD�_ �j
4
Lot Per Subdivision Plat
A Assessor
Site Plan..Checked for Accuracy_
Underground 14iring Reqd.
Check Accuracy of Legal Description
t ?:zd -7 —1
Z
Review by
Date
Existing Water Main Size
Main Required
r�er
Servic e Required
'ze
'st
Hydrant Size 's t U`19
�PerF
1:4
ad 1r
Hydrant Reqd Per Fi de
de
Si2
Detector Check 1,16�ter Reqd.
I tio
Cross Connection Inspection
Fire Department Conuien
Co ul
Water Yet Reqd.
�by'
Rja * w
Date
Septic Tank Design Approved
Date
p ptic Tank Permit Reqd.
Permit No.
Sani Sewer Availability.
Proj.
bra%wji-nO.
File No.
Side Sewe ilability—
Co
Sanitary Sewer ection Fee Reqd.
:3:
Review by_
/&te
Open Ditch Existirig�_
Reqd.,
:21
Culvert Reqd.
Size
P4
Catch Basin Reqd.
"-,,Indicate on Site Plan.
0
Shoulder drainage main * collection an
swale""�
�noff
Manhole reqd.
Indicate on. 'te Plan
Soil Conditi and Ground Water Field Checked
Review by
Date
Revised: XO-1977 "111\
�age
t Site Inspecticayn Tmmde omn
z
0
BY: SEWER
WAT
t ER
z STREET
ENGINEERING
�4 Special Requirements listed in merno�-,'to ComTunity Developn-ent Department,
Building Division
> BY Date— 1
'o All item filled in on Bui lding Permit Application
14 BY t2 -t\j Date
P' Drwwings., Starmed and Notations -Made
P4
BY Date,
Approved by Public Works, Department.
Eev:Lsed: 1v 10-1977
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
Date: u. Inf;n
11
If., Kenpj,% homRsEnAssociates, Inc.
e d, �e to
324 Main Street
Edmonds, qashington 98020
Gentlemen:
Forwarded herewith is a claim from_ 201"QY4 B AnAnvuOn
of16310 Sunset Way, E ds for damages in the
amount of to her for zar t=inv
resulting from contractual work under HEMax P'Ayoryla nnnd P.-*Ject
f�r water transmission mains in vicinity of 184th & Sunset Way. O.J. Jackson)
It is requested that this office be advised of action taken relative
to the claim within fifteen (15) days from receipt of this letter.
Please use the form below for your reply.
City Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Safeco Insurance Co.
REPLY
L. I. D. No.
Inspector:
Contractor:
Complainant:
Action taken:
Date:
Signature
APPLICATION
for
The- City,C4 Edmoncl-s' SIUDE SEIVER.PERMIT EASEMENT No . ..........................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS E]
/'ll"6WNEP - ------------ i 62�__Z,5> -------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR Ul-Je-75A�AA - ------ �,./ ------------------ PERIMT Noil,�,
_�DRESS ......
w .............................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No. ................................... BLOCK No.
NAMEOF ADDITION ..........................................................................................................................................
14J,
Approved:
DATE ...... . .......
.......... . ..... — ----- ---
0 -MMONDS
F
Call PRospect 6-1107 when work
_0CIVIC CENTER WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT
is ready for.inspection. (No Inspec-
tions Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N2 2673
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
18310 Sunset W
ADDRESS ................................... ....................... j�y ....................... ......... .....................................................................................................
OWNER .... Robe.r.t ... B ....... A.n.de.r-son .......................................... CONTRACTOR ..... Western Sewer & ... Const
....... .. .. .. .. .. .... .. ....... ......................................... .............. . ...............
Perinission is granted .... q��P�;4,ry ... 1.0 .............. 19_6 8., for ................ ....... .
..... days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
with City Sewers In accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. I—Th e owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer Inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not. cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.,
NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations. governing side, sewe a, when, you�. t, t.
NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and- - 12 Inches'Inside propert:� line; - minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than 'A will be permitted.'
NOTE No. 4—Trenebes in street'must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to Improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
0 TE_ No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than Is provided for In the permit, or to do a q ny.work on the main sewer or its appur-
tenances except to Insert the pipe into the wye.
_77
Robert.B�Anderson
1-8310 Sunset Way, -Edmonds
Lot 18, block 27,,range 4
rt-1 7f -2 .-Be& S%V cor govtl lot 1, th L�ly a1g. S ln s& govt Io t 1
3 01 - 01 ' t h, N, 1-1 01 3 7 " E 184. 2 Z _' t o t pb t h c ont 14 lt 154' t h I S 8934'
1 3 7
L" 294-54' th 5 2&!1 30" V1 40-74' th S 1;�,8'20" W 1
17-93' etc.
ker
FU
1�
NW 114., NW 114, SEC 18., TWP 27N. RGE 4E, W.M.
Q
Q) 4- )
I
E4
C)
EX PA VEMENT
(TO BE REMOVED)
SCALE: 1 10'
0 5 10 20
NZ
PUGET
SOUND
S1
18 7H SW
7H
VICIN17Y MAP
SCALE. 1"= 2000'
PROJECT TEAM
OWNERIAPPLICANT
SELECT HOMES
16531 13 TH A VENUE W. #A 10 7
LYNNWOOD, WASHINGTON 98037
(425) 742-6044
EMAIL: KAYLA.CLARK@OU`7LOOK.00M
CONTACT- KAYLA CLARK
CIVIL ENGINEER
RAM ENGINEERING, INC.
16531 13TH A VE W, SUI 7E A 108
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
(425) 678-6960
EMAIL:ROBL@RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM
CONTACT- ROB L. LONG, PE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
L 0 T 2, Cl TY OF EDMONDS SHOR T PLA T FILE NO. PLN20130059.
Sl TUA 7E IN 7HE COLIN TY OF SNOHOMISH, S TA 7E OF WA SHING TON.
. .......... ......
Uj
CO
V
Applicant shall repoir/roplace all damage to
f -- "
I utilifles or frantago, Improvements in City
right-of-way p�-ir Ca""I �'-W, ndards.that is cau,,7ed
occu�.-, during thf., pormitted projact.
0�1,11NERICONTRACT09F 1C, RESPONSIBLE FOR
EROSION CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
ICall 2 Working Days Before You Dig
811 or 1-800-424-5555
Utilities Underground Location Center
R-0
RK
NOV 0 3 2015
BUILDING DEPAR"I'MENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION,
C1 EDMONDS
DATE.
12-12
BY.
C17Y F-WGINMING DIWSION
16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE Al 08
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
PHONE: (425) 678-6960
WWW.RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM
LU
z
IL
Q
Q
U)
Q
LU
Uft
Q)
L -
U
A:� oV WA S 0
0
0
4k36508
101S
Illy-115
Z
Z
15
(a
Q
ENGINEER:
ROB L. LONG, PE
DRAWN BY.- MIKE MORRIS I
ISSUE DA7E. SCALE.
7121115 AS NOTED
JOB NO.
15-025
SHEET-
DM-0 I
SHT OF
.TREE PROTECTION MEASURES
(ECDC 18.45.050H)
WHEN TREE CUTTING OR LAND CLEARING I4qLL OCCUR PURSUANT TO A BUILDING,
PERMIT PR07EC77ON MEASURES SHOULD APPLY FOR ALL TREES WHICH ARE TO BE
RE TA INED IN A REA S IMMEDIA TEL Y SUBJEC T TO CONS MUC 770N. THE REQUIREVEN IS
LISTED MAYBE MODIFIED INDIWDUALL Y OR SEVERALLY BY THE CITY IF 774E
DEVELOPER DEMONS7RA 7ES THEM TO BE INAPPLICABLE TO THE SPECIFIC ON-S17E
CONDI T70NS OR IF THE IN TEN T OF THE REGULA 77ONS WILL BE IMPLEMEN TED B Y
A NO THER MEA NS IN TH THE SA ME RESUL T
WHERE THE DRIP LINE OF A TREE OVERLAPS A CONSTRUC77ON LINE, THIS SHALL
BE INDICATED ON THE SURVEY AND THE FOLLOWNG TREE PR07EC77ON MEASURES
SHALL BE EMPLOYED:
1. THE APPLICANT MA Y NOT FILL, EXCA VA 7E, STACK OR STORE ANY EQUIPMENT, OR
COMPACT THE EARTH IN ANY WAY WTHIN THE AREA DEFINED BY THE DRIP LINE OF
A N Y MEE TO BE RE TA INED.
2. THE APPLICANT SHALL ERECT AND MAINTAIN ROPE BARRIERS ON THE DRIP LINE
OR PLACE BALES OF HAY TO PR07ECT ROOTS. IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHALL
PRO14DE SUPERWSION WHENEVER EQUIPMENT OR TRUCKS ARE MOWNG NEAR TREES.
3. IF THE GRADE LEVEL ADJOINING A RETAINING TREE IS TO BE RAISED OR LOWERED,
THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSTRUCT A DRY ROCK WALL OR ROCK WELL AROUND THE
MEE. THE DIAMETER OF THIS WALL OR WELL MUST BE EQUAL TO THE TREES DRIP
LINE.
4. THE APPLICANT MA Y NOT INSTALL GROUND LEVEL IMPERWOUS SURFACE MA TERIAL
WTHIN THE AREA DEFINED BY THE DRIP LINE OF ANY MEE TO BE RETAINED.
5. THE GRADE LEVEL AROUND ANY TREE TO BE RETAINED MA Y NOT BE LOWERED
KITHIN THE GREATER OF THE FOLLOWNG AREAS- (A) THE AREA DEFINED BY THE
DRIP LINE OF THE TREE, OR (8) AN AREA AROUND THE MEE EQUAL TO ONE FOOT
IN DIAMETER FOR EACH ONE INCH OF TREE CALIPER.
6. THE APPLICANT MA Y PRUNE BRANCHES AND ROOTS, FER77LIZE AND WA TER AS
HOR77CUL TURALL Y APPROPRIA TE FOR ANY TREES AND GROUND COVER WHICH ARE
TO BE RETAINED.
THE PLANNING DI WSION MANA GER OR HISIHER DESIGNEE MA Y A PPRO VE THE USE
OF A L 7ERNA 77 VE TREE PRO 7EC 77ON TECHNIQUES IF THOSE TECHNIQUES PRO WDE A N
EQUAL OR GREA TER DEGREE OF PR07EC77ON THAN THE TECHNIQUES LISTED ABOVE.
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
(CITY OF EDMONDS SHORT PLAT FILE NO. PLN20130059)
1. SCHEDULE A PRE-CONSTRUCT70N MEETING KITH CITY ENGINEERING DIWSION AT 425-771-0220, 1 -- 11-1 - - . -- ' .
MANAGEMENT PLAN BY ORIGIN DESIGN GROUP
EXT. 1326. TWO DAY (48HR) NOTICE REQUIRED.
2. REWEW TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES. 3
3. CALL FOR U77LITY LOCATES.
4. INSTALL TESC MEASURES AND MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL WHILE PREVENTING DISTURBANCE OF
cot
ANY AREAS OF VEGETAT70N OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE. ve -.veer
5. HAVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES INSPECTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY ENGINEERING
INSPECTOR. ALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTA77ON AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN
PLACE AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR S17E CLEARING. EROSION AND
SEDIMENTA77ON CONTROL PRAC77CES ANDIOR DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UN77L PERMANENT ORANGE FIL TER
VEGETA77ON IS ESTABLISHED. FABRIC FENCE
'EDMONDS
CITY OF
6. DEMOLISH EXIS77NG STRUCTI)RES. SID Dk NO. El. 1
ee
Z ROUGH GRADE S17F AS REQUIRED TO INSTALL DRAINAGE FEATURES.
8. CLEAR, GRUB & ROUGH GRADE REMAINDER OF SITE. REVEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS NOT
SUBJECT TO ADD17IONAL SURFACE DISTURBANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER ROUGH GRADING. (OTHER
EXPOSED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PER EROSION CONTROL N07ES BELOW)
9. INSTALL U77LI77ES AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
10. INSTALL CB PR07ECT70N ON ANY NEW CATCH BASIN IMMEDIATELY UPON INSTALLATION.
MAINTAIN CB PROTEC77ON THROUGHOUT HOME CONSTRUCTION.
11. STABILIZE AND COMPOST AMEND ALL EXPOSED SOILS PRIOR TO REVEGETA77ON OF EN77RE SITE.
12. ESTABLISH LANDSCAPING AND PERMANENT VEGETATION. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED UPON FINAL SITE STABILIZAT70N AND APPROVAL BY CITY
INSPECTOR.
UTILITY PURVEYORS
WA TER SUPPL Y-
CITY OF EDA40NDS
425-771-0235
SA NITA R Y SEWER.
CITY OF EDMONDS
425-771-0235
STORM SEWER.
CITY OF EDMONDS
425-771-0235
PHONE.
FRON77ER
425-263-4024
CONTACT- JEREMYFALLT
CABLE.
COMCAST
425-244-5088
CON TACT- JEFF BURNS
GAS.-
PSE
888-225-5773
POWER.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUD
425-783-1000
CONTACT- ROB LARSON
FIRE DISTRICT-
SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE DIS MIC T NO. 1
425-551-1200
SCHOOL DISTRICT-
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
425-670-7000
LINE
TYPE
AREA (SQUARE FEET)
NON-REGULA TED
0
. .. . ........ . . ... ....
. ................ ... .... ......
........................ . . .........
.......... ............................. . . ........... . .. ..... ..
EXEMP T
REGULA TED
2.
REPLA CED
0
0
3.
NEW (POST 1977)
+
3,854
4.
TOTAL REGULA TED IMPER V40US AREA
3,854
5.
TOTAL AREA M177GA TED BY EXIS77NG STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT SYS7EM(S)
3,854
6.
REGULA TED AREA NOT YET MI 77GA TED
0
z
AREA PROPOSED TO BE M177GA TED BY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES,
0
a.
A REA PROPOSED TO BE MI 77GA TED THROUGH CON VEN 77ONA L S WW TECHNIQUES
1
0
sysmm msl6m�o Porz. - 31�vD!so* (Lb-r z) -
A
17611 M1114MM-7 N7�
HOU.SE+COVERED DIW, PA 770, PORCH & WALK 3, 080 SF
(ROOF LINE)
UNCOVERED PA 770 AND WALK 146 SF
UNCOVERED DRI VEW4 Y 628 SE
TOTAL 3,854 SF
LOT COVERAGE
LOT AREA: 12,224 SF
ALLOWABLE COVERAGE (35X) 4,278 SF
HOUSE, COVERED DECK AND GARAGE 2,698 SF
PERCENT CO VERA GE 22.07X
BUILDING HEIGHT
CALCULATIONS (AEG)
SPOT ELEVA 77ONS FOR HEIGHT CALCULA
77
292.01
ELEVA 77ON A:
ELEVA 77ON B.
298.11
ELEVA 77ON C.-
ELEVA
299.90
77ON D.
294.60
1,184.6
296.15
TO TA L:
A VERA GE ORIGINAL GRADE (A 0Q)
TOP OF GARAGE SLAB
299.50
ROOF A T RIDGE
319.92
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT
321.15
(AOG + 25 FT)
GRADING QUANTITIES
CUT FILL
250 CY 250 CY
UTILITY NOTE
CIVIL ENGINEER Comer Flag__%/
RAM ENGINEERING, INC.
&&&
Actual
16531 137H A VE W, SUI 7E A 108
301f
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
(425) 678-6960
kkk sides �4
S
EMAIL: ROBLORAMENGINEERINGINC, COM
'r-6 JiotherA/
CONTACT- ROB L. LONG, PE
1w2h
LATILITIES WILL- III&E 9ZMW60 WO/OrL
rkppm Lwoet- -wr mmcwno" 1POtMIT (SLID 2415' OT60, SHEETINDEX
OWNER/CONTRACM[I �"'-.'�:,"IiLSPONSIBLE FOR I SP-01
EROSION CONTRCL AND I)PAINP.GE 2 GN-01
P rGP,.iir/rPp1ace all damage to
Iimprovemonts in City
right-of-way Pri "'4%,istandards that Is caueed
1 1
OVOU1.3, dUring tria permitted project.
ALL NEW U77LI71ES ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED
UNDERGROUND.
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
GENERAL NOTES & DETAILS
15- C)cjq -2,
Call 2 Working Days Before You Dig
811 or 1-800-424-5555
Utilities Underground Location Center
41
RESUB
NOV 0 3 2015
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF EDMONDS
DA TE.-
BY-
a TY EWGINEMING DI W.90N
16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE Al 08
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
PHONE: (425) 678-6960
WWW.RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM
>- 1�
Cn ZE
Doc
LJ I R,
LL-
Z3
LO
`5"
CN
Z
ftftft
Z
5
Z
U-
Z u-
L
'UJ F.
UJ UJ LU
Q L
co
LU
1-z
a-"
co
Z
Lt.
ENGINEER:
.e% IV L
- V
dy 0
�Z508
is
101VAI,
11161205
ROB L. LONG, PE
DRAWN B Y.-
MIKE MORRI
ISSUE DATE. SCALE.
7120115 AS N07ED
JOB NO.-
15-025
SHEET. SP-01 I
SHT 1 OF 2
GENERAL NOTES
1. ALL MA TERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD PLANS AND DE TAILS,
774E FOLLOWING SPECIFICA 77ONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STA TE, AND FEDERAL CODES,
RULES AND REGULATIONS.
- CURRENT W7ERNA 77ONAL BUILDING CODE (18C)
- 2014 W5DOT1APWA STANDARD SPECIFICA T70NS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONS7RUCTION
- WASHINGTON STA 7E DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWA TER
MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT ED177ON)
2.STANDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICA TED ON THESE DRA WINGS REFER TO CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARD DETAILS, UNLESS
N07ED OTHERWISE
J.A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBS17E WHENEVER CONSTRUCRON IS IN PROGRESS.
4. DEWA 77ONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND 7HE LOCAL GOVERNING AU7HORITY
5. CONMACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEWA 77ONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF `AS-BUIL 7- DRA WNGS AND SHALL
SUMMARIZE ALL A S- BUIL T CONDI 77ONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRA WINGS FOR SUBMI TTAL TO THE 0 WNER PRIOR
PROJEC T COMPLE77ON A ND A CCEP TANCE. A SE T OF A S-BUIL T DRA WINGS SHALL BE SUBMI TTED TO 7HE Cl TY OF EDMONDS PRIOR
TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OCCUPANCYAFINAL PROJECT APPROVAL.
6. ELEVA 77ONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMA 770N.
Z THE LOCA 77ONS OF EXIS77NG U77LI77ES AND S17E FEA 7URES SHOWN HEREON HA VE BEEN FURNISHED BY OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY
OR OBTAINED FROM A VAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD 7HEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMA TE ONL Y AND NOT NECESSARIL Y
COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CON7RACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY 7HE ACCURACY OF ALL U77LITY
LOCA 77ONS SHOWN AND TO FUR 7HER DISCOVER AND PR07ECT AN Y 07HER U77LI77ES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MA Y BE
AFFECTED BY 7HE IMPLEMENTATION OF 7HIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCA 77ON, DEP771, SIZE, TYPE AND COND177ON OF
EXIS77NG U77LITY LINES AT CONNEC77ON OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE 7RENCHING FOR NEW UTILITIES. ENGINEER ASSUMES NO
RESPONSIBILITY FOR 7HE COMPLETENESS OR A CCURACY OF 7HE EXIS77NG U77LI77ES AND S17E FEA TURES PRESEN TED ON THESE
DRA WINGS, ENGINEER SHALL BE N077FIED IMMEDIA TEL Y OF CONFLICTS THA T ARISE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCA TE AND PR07ECT ALL U77LI77ES DURING CONSTRUCRON AND SHALL CONTACT THE UNDERGROUND U77LI77ES
LOCA 77ON SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCRON.
9. CON7RACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL COND177ONS AND DIMENSIONS A T 7HE PROJECT S17F BEFORE STAR77NG WORK AND SHALL N077FY
0 WNER �5 REPRESEN TA 77 VE OF A N Y DISCREPANCIES.
10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMA IF AND MA Y CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS.
11. CONTITACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF 7HE GE07ECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE
HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS 7HEREOF ALL S17E WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN S7RICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE
RECOMMENDA 77ONS OF THIS REPORT
12. STRUCTURAL FILL MA 7ERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDA 77ONS OF 7HE PROJECT GE07ECHNICAL
REPORT
13. SUBGRADE SOILS IN ALL AREAS WHERE RAIN GARDENS, WFIL IRA 77ON OR PERWOUS PA VEMENT IS TO BE PLACED SHALL BE
DELINEA TED AND PROTECTED A T ALL 77MES FROM COMPAC77VE AC77W77ES (I. e. HEA VY EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILING).
14. MANHOLES, CA TCH BASINS, U77LI77ES AND PA VEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE NA 77VE SOIL OR
COMPACTED S7RUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFT, LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC MA TERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE
ELEVA 77ON, REMOVE AND REPLACE NTH COMPACTED S7RUCTURAL FILL PER GE07ECHNICAL REPORT
15. SEE SURVEY AND ARCH17ECTURAL DRA WINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCA 77ONS OF BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPED AREAS AND 07HER
PROPOSED OR EXIS 77NG St 7E FEA TURES.
16. SEE ARCH17ECTURAL DRA WINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDA 77ON DRAINS. FOUNDA 77ON DRAINS SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER
SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE 77GHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE INDICATED ON 7HE PLANS.
1Z ALL REQUIRED STORMWA TER FACIL177ES MUST BE CONS7RUCTED AND IN OPERA T70N PRIOR TO INSTALLA 77ON OF ANY PA VEMENT
UNLESS 07HERWSE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
18. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDA 77ON DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND 07HER EX7ERNAL DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, UNLESS N07ED OTHERWISE.
19. ALL F0077NG DRAINS SERVING BUILDINGS, WALLS, ROCKERIES, ETC. SHALL CONNECT TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF
THE S1 7E S TORM WA TER DE TEN 77ON S Y5 TEM.
20. CON IRA C TOR SHA L L 08 TAIN A NO PA Y FOR A LL PERMI IS REQUIRED FOR INS TA LLA 77ON OF A L L S1 7E IMPRO VEMEN IS 114DICA TIED ON
7HESE DRAWINGS.
21. A SEPA RA TE IRRIGA 77ON PERMI T MUS T BE OB TA WED FROM THE Cl TY PUBLIC WORKS DEPA R 7MEN T PRIOR TO FINA L CONS MUC 77ON
A CCEP TA NCE, PRO WDE TO THE Cl TY WA TER QUA L I TY TECHNICIA N, A COP Y OF THE BA CKFL 0 W TES T REPOR T TFS T REPOR IS CA N
BE FAXED TO 425-744-6057 OR EMAILED TO LWDA,MCMURpHy0EpM0NDSWA.G0 BACRTLOW 7ES77NG SHALL BE COMPLETED
BY 7HE OWNER ANNUALLY THEREAFTER,
22. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF S17E SHALL BE RETURNED TO 7HE EQUIVALENT OF 7HEIR
PRECONSTRUCRON COND177ON IN ACCORDANCE KITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS.
23. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE COMPOST AMENDED AND SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR
THE PREVEN77ON OF ON- 517E EROSION AFTER THE COMPLE77ON OF CONSTYUC770N. SEE EROSION CONMOL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE SMEETS CLEAN AT ALL 77MES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE SMEETS NLL NOT BE
ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL.
25. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EAR IN WORK PROJECT B07H EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND ROCK MATERIALS ARE
REQUIRED.
26. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVA 77ONS SHOWN.
2Z FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE A WA Y FROM BUILDING WALLS A T MINIMUM
5X SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 10 FEET
28. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING AS NECESSARY TO
PR07ECT WORKERS, EXIS77NG BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, U77LI77ES AND 07HER EXIS77NG AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
AND EXCAVAT70NS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAWNG EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS REQUIRED.
29. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY AND FOLLOW CITY PROCEDURES FOR ALL WA TER SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS,
HYDRANT SHUTOFFS, SMEET CLOSURES OR 07HER ACCESS RESTRICTIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELOCA TE OR ELIMINA 7E
ANY HYDRANTS WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL.
30. COORDINA 7E AND ARRANGE FOR ALL U77LITY CONNECTIONS, U77LITY RELOCA 77ONS ANDIOR SERVICE INTERRUP77ONS WITH THE
AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIA 7E U77LITY COMPANIES. CONNEC77ONS TO
EXIS77NG U77LI77ES SHALL BE MADE ONLY NTH ADVANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AU7HORITIES GOVERNING SAID UTILITIES.
31. ALL U77LI77ES SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND.
32. EXIS77NG U77LITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSMUC77ON WORK SHALL BE REPAIRED A T CONTRACTOR�5
EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND OWNER�5 REPRESENTA 77VE PRIOR TO BACKFILLING.
33. NEW U77LITY LOCA 77ONS ARE GENERALL Y SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICA TED, LOCA 77ONS MA Y BE
SCALED FROM DRA WINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER�5 REPRESENTA 77VE AND CITY
34. FIELD STAKE ALL U77LITY STUBS AT 7HE PROPERTY LINE.
35. TRENCH BACKFILL OF U77LI77ES LOCA TED WITHIN 7HE CITY RIGHT -OF- WA Y SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95X COMPAC77ON TEST
REPORTS SHALL BE PRO VIDED TO 7HE CITY PRIOR TO PA 14NG.
36. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXIS77NG OR NEW U77LITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POL YETHYLENE PLAS77C FOAM AS A CUSHION
BETWEEN THE U77LI77ES.
3Z SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CON77NUA77ON OF S17E U77LI77ES WTHIN 7HE BUILDING.
38. SEE ELECTRICAL DRA WNGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK.
39. SEE LANDSCAPE DRA WNGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SI IF IRRIGA 77ON SYS7Em.
40. PIPE MA TERIA L A NO SIGNA GE SUBMI TTA L S SHA L L BE PRO VIDED TO Ct TY ENGINEERING DI VISION FOR A PPRO VA L PRIOR TO
INSTALLA 770N.
NW 114, NW 114, SEC 18., TWP 27N. RGE 4E. W.M.
TESC NOTES
1. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUT, CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS SHALL BE, WHENEVER
PRACTICAL, LIMITED TO ONE ROUTE. ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH QUARRY SPALLS OR CRUSHED ROCK
TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE,
THE ROADS SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ROADS
BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING AND BE TRANSPORTED TO A CONTROLLED SEDIMENT DISPOSAL AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS.
S7REET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER.
2. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT-STABILIZA77ON OF EXPOSED AREAS. ALL SOILS EXPOSED BY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES
SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SUITABLE APPLICA77ON OF BMPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED, SOD, HYDROSEEDING, OR
OTHER VEGETATION, PLASTIC COVERING, OR MULCHING. ALL BMPS SHALL BE SELECTED, DESIGNED, AND MAINTAINED IN
ACCORDANCE W17H THE MANUAL. 7HE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE STABILIZED ACCORDING TO AN APPROVED TIMETABLE.
(TYPICALLY, NO SOILS SHALL REMAIN EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN TWO DAYS FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30 AND
NO MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS FROM NAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30).
3. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT-PROTEC71ON OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ADJACENT PROPER77ES SHALL BE PROTECTED
FROM SEDIMEN T DEPOSI 77ON B Y APPROPRIA TE USE OF VEGETA 77 VE BUFFER STRIPS, SEDIMEN T BARRIERS OR FIL TERS,
DIKES OR MULCHING, OR BY A COMBINA 77ON OF THESE MEASURES AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS.
4. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT- MAINTENANCE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE REGULARLY
INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED BY 7HE OMER TO ENSURE CONTINUED PERFORMANCE OF THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION. ALL
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 1417H THE MANUAL.
5. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -OTHER BMPS. AS REQUIRED BY 7HE CITY� 07HER APPROPRIATE BMPS TO MITIGATE THE
EFFECTS OF INCREASED RUNOFF SHALL BE APPLIED.
6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT- UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONSTRUC77ON OF
UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS 7HE FOLLOMNG:
0. EROSION CONTROL FOR EXCAVATED AND STOCKPILED MATERIALS,
b. 7HE PLACEMENT OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL WHERE CONSISTENT Wf7H SAFETY AND SPACE CONSIDERA77ONS SHALL
BE PLACED ON 7HE UPHILL SIDE OF TRENCHES;
C. TRENCH DEWATERING SYSTEMS (MUST DISCHARGE INTO SEDIMENT TRAPS, SEDIMENT PONDS, OR 07HER
ACCEPTABLE MEANS),
d 7RACKING AND SPILLING OF MATERIALS ON STREETS DUE TO HAULING,
e. DAILY CLEANUP AND STREET MAINTENANCE.
Z ADDITIONAL ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR LARGER DEVELOPMENTS. ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT
THAT INCLUDED LAND DISTURBING ACTIV171ES OF GREATER THEN, OR EQUAL TO, ONE ACRE IN ADD177ON TO MEE77NG
THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL COMPLY I4q7H ESC REQUIREMENTS LISTED BELOW.
8. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT- DELINEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT LIMITS. IN THE FIELD, MARK CLEARING LIMITS
ANDIOR ANY EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, SENSI 77 VEICRI 77CAL AREAS AND THE BUFFERS, TREES AND DRAINAGE COURSES.
9. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -SEDIMENT TRAPPING. PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, STORM WATER RUNOFF SHALL PASS
THROUGH A SEDIMENT POND OR SEDIMENT TRAP, OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS,
PERIMETER DIKES, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, AND 07HER BMPS INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT ON -SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUC7ED
AS A FIRST STEP IN GRADING. 7HESE BMPS SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE LAND DISTURBING AC77WTIES TAKE PLACE.
EARTHEN STRUCTURES, SUCH AS DAMS, DIKES, AND DIVERSIONS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO AN
APPROVED TIMETABLE.
10. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -CUT AND FILL SLOPES. CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A
MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE EROSION. IN ADD1770N, SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE K17H ESC
REQUIREMENT NO. 2QU. SEE ADD177ONAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDA77ONS IN MARCH 28, 2013 LETTER.
11. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT- CONTROLLING OFF -SITE EROSION. PROPER77ES AND WATER WAYS DOWNSTREAM FROM
DEVELOPMENT SITES SHALL BE PR07ECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO WCREASES IN THE VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW
RATE OF STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
12. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT-STABILIZA77ON OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS. ALL TEMPORARY
ON -SITE CONVEYANCE CHANNELS SHALL BE DESIGNED, CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION FROM THE
EXPECTED VELOCITY OF FLOW FROM A TWO- YEAR, 24-HOUR FREQUENCY STORM FOR THE DEVELOPED CONDITION.
STABILIZA71ON ADEQUATE TO PREVENT EROSION OF OUTLETS, ADJACENT STREAM BANKS, SLOPES AND DOWNSTREAM
REACHES SHALL BE PROWDED AT 7HE OUMETS OF ALL CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS.
13. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -STORM DRAW INLET PROTECTION. ALL STORM DRAW INLETS MADE OPERABLE DURING
CONSTRUC71ON SHALL BE PROTECTED SO 7HA T STORM WA TER RUNOFF SHALL NOT ENTER THE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
KI THOU T FIRST BEING FIL TERED OR 0 THER WSE TREA TED TO REMO VE SEDIMEN T
14. ESC MINIMUM REQUIREMENT -REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS
SHALL BE REMOVED WI7HW 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY BMPS ARE
NO LONGER NEEDED. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED OR STABILIZED ON SITE. DISTURBED SOIL AREAS RESULTING
FROM REMOVAL SHALL BE PERMANEN7LY STABILIZED.
15. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT-DEWATERING CONSTRUC77ON SITES. DEWATERING SYSTEMS SHALL
DISCHARGE INTO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT POND.
16. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT -CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION
S17FS. ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT THAT OCCUR ON S17E DURING CONSTRUC770N SHALL BE HANDLED AND
DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORM WATER.
1Z EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT -FINANCIAL LIABILITY PERFORMANCE BONDING, OR 07HER APPROPRIATE
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL PROJECTS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE KITH THE APPROVED EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN. [ORD. 3013 1, 1995].
FILTER FABRIC -
SECURED TO 2' X 2'
14 GA. WIRE FABRIC
EQUAL
2' X 2' WOOD OR
EQUIVALENT-\,,
I �
8'- 12'
PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN
THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN
CONTINOUS ROLLS. USE STAPLES
OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH
FABRIC TO WIRE.
C I D I I-VWIRE MESH SUPPORT FENff
I - T SUPPORT FILTER FAMIC,
N
m
14U,Rlqm�� - I I "!Lir
m
�u -(- - - - - - - - - - -
:BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER
MATERIAL 8' TO 12'
I L 6' MAX,
L1\ 2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR Li
EQUIVALENT
CONTRACTOR /DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE
STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL,
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL
EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE
OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN.
-C-1-TY
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
APPROVED BY DATE
RLIS FAM FM FL7070 SYM
1890
6,_ _ 1 i9q- DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS DWG NO. E1.1
FINAL JOINT SHALL BE A NEAT HMA CLASS 112'
STRAIGHT LINE AND ALL EXPOSED PG 58-22
EDGES SHALL BE TACKED NEATLY (SEE NOTE 5)
WITH WSDOTSTANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS 5-04.3(5)A
APPROVED TACK OR APPROVED
EQUAL. SLOPE EXCAVATION TO
AVOID UNDERMINING EXISTING
EXISTING HMA--i III i
A' :4
EXISTING
MATERIAL �d I 1=1 4 4
1-1/4' MINUS
CSBC PER WSDOT TRENCH WIDT�
9-03.9(3) IMPORT OR NATIVE MATERIAL
(SEE NOTES 3&4) BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO
95% MAXIMUM DENSITY (SEE NOTE 2)
NOTES:
1. SEE CITY OF EDMONDS MODIFICATIONS TO DIVISION 9 OF THE CURRENT WSDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILLING REQUIREMENTS.
2. SUBMIT PROCTOR AND DENSITY TESTS FROM CERTIFIED TESTING COMPANIES DOCUMENTING THAT
/GRATE THE BACKFILL MEETS A MINIMUM OF 95% DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557,
3. CSBC DEPTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM 6' OR MATCH EXISTING WHICHEVER IS GREATER, WHEN
MATCHING EXISTING CSBC DEPTH GREATER THEN 6', THEN CSBC SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
MULTIPLE EQUAL THICKNESS LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 6'.
CB 4. IF TRENCH WIDTH EXCEEDS 6 FEET IN WIDTH, THE TOP 2' OF CSBC SHALL BE REPLACED
WITH A SEPARATE 2' LIFT OF 5/8' MINUS CSTC PER WSDOT 9-03.9(3).
5. HMA DEPTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' THICK. UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, ANY
DEPTH GREATER THAN 4' SHALL MATCH EXISTING. UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER, THE
HMA SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MULTIPLE EQUAL THICKNESS LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 2'.
6, FINAL PAVEMENT JOINTS SHALL BE NEATLY AND UNIFORMILY SEALED WITH WSDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED JOINT SEALANT OR APPROVED EQUAL.
FILTER SOCK WITH
OVER FLOW HOLES
- A
7 OF, .....E.- D M0 N..'D
CITY
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
APPROVED BY DATE
ED BY
D. EGEBERT 7,129/05 TYPICAL HMA AND UTILITY PATCH
CATCH BASIN D. GEBERT 04/2/07 DATE SCALE DWG NO.
GLI
Est. 18913 7/24/01 NTS EU
R. ENGLISH 10/04/11 1 1 1
STRAW BALES MAY BE USED IN
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES (SEE
DETAIL E1,11), THIS APPLICAITON
SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL
TIMES DURING CONSTRUCITON
PERIOD,
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN.
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
APPROVED BY I DATE I
D, GEBERT 10/06/03
D, GEBERT 05/19/05 TaVWY S=ff 7W IN CA= BAN
D, GEBERT ::::
0:
5,
0:
5/
0:
6,- i D__ 1 6:j DATE
1890-1990 7/24/01
MIN, RADIUS
QUARRY SPALLS
2-4' MIN DIA
8`12' MIN. DEPTH
PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/
EGRESS AREA
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD,
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTRO
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. I
F
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
APPROVED BY DATE
D. GEBERT 10/6/03 DATE STARMCINS11=1917M
1890-1990 7/24/01- 1 SCALE NTS I DWG NO. E12
CLEAN OUTS
RESIDENCE
CLEANOUT WITH 45'
�BEND AND CAP
CLEANOUT <WYE WITH CAPI
AND LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVER
& CONCRETE LEVELING COLLAR
12'+/-
J
ATER TIGHT CAP
R IWS E R
4' OR 6' SIDE SEWER-J
GENERAL CLEANOUT DETAIL
121
ASPHALT SURFACE _L
12" PVCZ
SLEEVE
6" RISER
6' WYE AND
AND 1/8 B
z
Uj
Id
V)
-1404N6"
CONCRETE
COLLAR
LEVELING COLLAR
Lij /LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVER
Z 12" MIN.
_j
CONCRETE PAD
6" CITY STUB
4' OR 6' SIDE SEWER-d
CLEAN OUT DETAIL AT PROPERTY LINE
12" LOCKING LAMPHOLE COVER
(EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS CO.)
6' RISER 12" PVC SLEEVE MODEL #: 00366108)
-t PVC CAP NOTE:
TYPICAL CL ANOUT UNDER ASPHALT SIDE SEWER JOINTS SHALL BE
OR CONCRETE GASKETED
M.-G.-ND-S
.C.-.: --TY-:.-,0':
REVISIONS
APPROVED BY I DATE STANDARD DETAIL
D, GEBERT 6/16/03
SEWER CLEANOUT DETAILS
01/06/05
D. GEBERT
1890- 1 RGEBERT 4/2/07 DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS DWG NO. EU
Call 2 Working Days Before You Dig
'o
811 or 1-800-424-5555
Utilities UJLnderground Location Center
RESUB
NOV 0 3 2015
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF EDMONDS
DA TE.
BY.
--67Y F.WGINEMING DIW301V
16531 13TH AVE W, SUITE Al 08
LYNNWOOD, WA 98037
PHONE: (425) 678-6960
WWW.RAMENGINEERINGINC.COM
:�_ ICo
Z
Q_
(n
LU
at
tc)
C14
Z
co
co
- j
Uj
LU
0a
co
Z
LU Uj
LO
co
Uj
Z
Uj
CO
Co ;t
a
Z
vftj Q
Uj
0
1z;js
#/tIm/75;
ENGINEER:
ROB L. LONG, PE
DRAWN BY.
MIKE MORRIS
ISSUE DATE. SCALE:
7120115 AS N07ED
OB NO.
15-02m 5
rT GN.0 I
SHT 2 OF 2
285.4
MISS
LU
0
0
z
27
" L_ LJ 28p.gbb.
EITELP
2 9:;��.4:2'(RMA I q"7:2)
2
297.6 295 7 71
:_ " - CI-�DAR 1�
CEDAR 32" 1 28
42'1�r
N 89044'00" A DOGWOOD 8" 293.7294.0
:2d12.45'
% 99-24Z 293.5
CEDAR
102.00,
89.94
VI N)
`IDUOUS 10"
287.0 DEC
LU 289.6
Q�28
all
31EDAIR 36" (cf-?nup or--
<
LU
C E D A R 5 0
2 9-3-3 t -\CHERRY 6"
289.0
CHESTNUT 8" 289-0
FI F XG
SS- SS 41
SS ss R5UP OF 3)
SS K kTE LOSATION 296.8
EX. YD
6757D B CEDAR 32" 2' 6
2 5�. 6 T 0 P:, qy.'7 4 2
RANDALLJ.MUNSON
C E 1) A R APPROXIMATE LOCATION 294.9 BUILDING DESIGNER
4" 51VE 5ENER INV- .2al SD
288.7
2 1
17713
_,2912 f-. 293.8 CEDAR 45"
EDAR 32" 289.1 o ty- U
U)
0
HEMLOCK A
Ex. -r!? (TWI N) Ali 15TH AVENUE NORTHEAST
V)
FIR 36" SUITE 102
I< >
EX. MH :)5Eb IN\/=2 EAB SHORELINE
TOP=265.14 DECI< 1 1*
lot 284.4 0 0 �APPLE 12" WASHINGTON
ol 290.0 P L U 1\11 16 Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to P 98155
OP -14
2,
ITN\/-;17 I
280.3 V.7 utilities or frontage improvements in City
292.5 C 289.8 287.3
291.3 292 6 right-of-way per City standards that is caused (206) 349-4551
U) or occurs during the er
286.1
2912.8 wM
0
M
2-STORY 4SIDENCE
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
FIRST FLOOR=300.85
00.6 !1 le-1 I A ."14" THIS PLAN IS ISSUED FOR
GA 18,725 SF A S H 6 BASEMENT= 292.6�' 8. 290.3 CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY THE
15,536 SF (NET) CLIENT INDICATED.
REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS
289.5 DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
OVVNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE U V) WRITTEN CONSENT OF DESIGNER,
RANDALL J. MUNSON, IS PROHIBITED.
1 3006 F@R LOCATING ALL ON -SITE UTILMES. ARCHITECT MAINTAINS ALL RIGHTS
292.5 292 41 3 0* 0.6 K R:LOCAIIONIREVISION TO AW L M-LMES UNDER STATE AND FEDER& LAW,
0.6 2 A
INCLUDING COPYRIGHT.
298.8 tf) MAY REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMIT. 288.9
277.� 0 lot 6UTTER AT SOUTH EDISS,
OF EX15TING, ROOF TO (3 (is CONTRACTOR NOTICE
ON 290.5 - 0 M L 1�_,
288.5 SLOPE TO NORTH (3 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL
CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS
ON ------------- AT THE JOB SITE AND NO`rIFY
z
THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DIMEN.
FIR 32" OH�
��IVAPLE 38" SIONAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR
z
29 294.3 DISCREPANCIES BEFORE BEGII
PEAR 8" 9 SS SS INING OR FABRICATING ANY WORK.
'0
2 8'8. 5 290.5
J
DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS,
2
12,000 SF
NEW SFR 292.2
V)
N OD 61,
283.8 293.4 REVISIONS
280.4
32"
MOVED
E YO 296.2 No. Date Item
12 9.5
P=:2q5.46 EX15TIN6 SARA6E To BE REMOVED 293.9 CYCLE NO. 1
A
286.5 IN\/(N)=:2c[ 1 11.17.14 CORRECTIONS
A-7
I NVI
5/411 CYCLE NO. 2
12.03.14 CORRECTIONS
2 .7
F I' I
281.5 n
274.0
276.3
oll
(�__J!P,PLE 24"
d
IC6�
292.9
0"S NOT
TO BE TIED iNTO V)
j �1� Cor IORE\- 7E
H E 0 FT. E 1k M0 .5 Ys TE 1
285.1 vi SIVENAL<
V)
:251 LA
It
i'
In UYVIVER/Comr, P, mj-�iq
j
.0 FORE
r� ES P ONSID L E
C, lu <
A. U) I
C E D A, R 2,d;:;, %Z ILI
2 _,Z:
'11-1APLE
4 8" j 295.8 0
V)
<
281.2 1,1 F' A,
OR055 HATCHED!'-' z
kll�,�_" )Vt, 7.1
12.00'
JS ARE 1 50. FT.
W
FI R 36 HEMLOCK 32F"
C E_� R 4 D
211.10'
2 a,7. 0 A,
CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO
TO PROVIDED 5TUB
29 .9
290.7
00
293.6 A-VIN
27L
z M
W
\R 40 I -A, z
I I <
284.2
tu
q)
<
296.8 K F
1, 1�"")"/ � I _j
Z
'*���2 9 7.
MAPLE '0"
285-a7
289.0 0
(GROUP OF
< Cn
CL_
D A R /1 S
MAPLE 28" F- z
7 Uj Z 0
15' ACCESS 4 UTILIT'r-
V)
280.9 E5MT FOR LOTS 2 4 5 (,ROUP OF 5)
296.1 C/) Z C,
297.P
NORTH
0 r- C)
< Cf) C\J
LLJ 0
x
7, V 06
11t, __j , `-;� i
A �X
x_1_x_ x
-x-x-x- x-x z U) Z
a4AI' Z Ly
2'11.51'(RMA 101-72) 0 Q
DATU N 6dIoI*7'54" N (DESO.) 12'5HARED ASPHALT Z Z
012.64' CBMH M EAST xTx NEN FIRE 1_L1 -
A 9 4 >
HYDRANT W <
TOP :2cl5.0 FOP, LOTS :2 AND 5 277.52 (5F) ek 1�
INV 25CLO Oki \,(01�0k.\S, a\A
0� C) <
j ses w
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - es", ruo <
r e\s oes Va!e .0 CY)
\v\ . tDe
LL LL_ 0
J,
rO
W
�CALE: I" = 10'-0" k :) 1 0 1
5FT MAX. HEI&HT RETAININ(5 NALL 010 p69'1N ws �S\N qPej\ VO en 0 _j
6r' YV-"' 0'04 VCP z
\?,- - 'De
1�0 \ks- .,\\ 00 0 co
v. :\VVqTj-o
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT COVERAGE PROPERTY OWNER TABLE OF AREAS SITE CLASSIFICATION WORKSHEET - w ;1- 2
mr- (.5 w 't C,
PARCEL B RESOURCE TRAN51TION CONSULTANTS, LLC LIVING 5254 SQUARE FEET 004"SqP W
BEI57INNIN& AT THE SIN GUARTER OF 6OVERNMENT LOT 1, LOT AREA IZ224 SGUARE FEET 144 RAILROAD AVENUE, SUITE 510 GARAGE 572 SQUARE FEET LINE TYPE AREA (50UARE FEET)
SECTION 15, TONNSHIP 2-7 NORTH, RAN&t= 4 FAST, N.M., EDMONDS, NA5HIN&TON `:1aO2O PORCH 45 SQUARE FEET NP
COVERED CECK 210 SQUARE FEET -D
THENCE EASTERLY ALON6 THE SOUTH LINE OFSAID (425) 561-2514 DECK 565 SQUARE FEET I NON-RE6ULATE 0 STREET FILE SITE PLAN,
&OVERNMENT LOT I FOR 501.1 FEET; RESIDENCE 162-T SOUARE FEET (_0e
THENCE NORTH IdOI'3'1" EAST FOR 164.22 FEET TO THE EXEMPT REC7ULATED PROJECT DATA and
7INNIN&; INDEX OF
TRUE POINT OF BEC OPEN DECK 565 50UARE FEET TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER &LAZIN& AREA 635 SQUARE FEET
THENCE CONTINUIN6, NORTH IdOI'5'7" EAST FOR 154 FEET; COVERED DECK 210 SGUARE FEET GLAZINSAE A PERCENTAGE OF FLOOR AREA.= 11.54% 2 REPLACED 255160 0 ZOne-_%. Cor-ner-Flag_ DRAWINGS
THENCE SOUTH aqd44'EAST FOR 2-:14.54 FEET, 2'7041500201500 �,etbacks , L_ji�r N&
THENCE SOUTH 20d2l'50" NEST FOR II'7A5 FEET; PORCH 45 5OUARE FEET 2012 NASHI146TON STATE ENERGY CODE ININDOY45 .50 V VALUE _!�f _qd 4 Lqal
THENCE NORTH 50ldl'754" NEST FOR 21cf.'75 FEET TO DOORS .20 V VALUE 5 NEN (POST 1"1"71) + 1"784 Front 15 __2 Il �1-0_5)
&ARAGE 5-72 5011JARE FEET I I e
THE TRUE POINT OF BE&NNINrv. HEIGHT CALCULATION MEDIUM GAS FURNACE TOTAL RE(SULATED IMPERVIOUS AREA Sides t4 PROJECT NO. 14.108
4 MIT16ATION REGUIRED IF IN EXCF55 OF 2,000 5F 1"754 Rear DESIGN RJIVI
51TUATE IN THE COUNTY OF 5NOHOM15H,STATE OF POINT - A 1.5 ENER6Y CREDIT #5b (1) HIGH EFFICIENCY KATER HEATING: 5111 DRAWN RJIVI
-A MITI&ATED 13r F-XISTINC7
NASHIN&TON. TOTAL 501'7 5OUARE FEET POINT - 5 GAS HOT NATER HEATER MIN. EF OF 0.52 5 TOTAL ARr_ 0 ISSUE DATE :03.17.14
POINT - C. 500.00, STORM104ATER MANA6EMENT 51r5Tr=MI I -lei ht
PARCEL 5 LOT 2 12,224 50. FT. POINT - D 2cf-7:70' A:2 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE CALC & RE&ULATED ARE NOT YET MITIGATED
A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR IN&RE55 AND E&RE55 LOT COVERA6E AS A PERCENTAGE LOT AREA 24.65% TOTAL 1185.45' OR055 HATCHED AREA PROPOSI�D TO BE MIT167ATED 5Y
AS CREATED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED SEPTEM5ER 2-7, Icicicl ARX-A ALLO�ATEV FOP, LOT 2 AIT SQUARE FEET -7 LOV4 IMPACT 12EVF-ELOPMENT TECHNIOMS
UNPER RECORDIN& No. Icicl,1082-70525, RECORDS OF ARFA At Fers;
SNOHOMISH -COUNTY, NA5HINSTON. ENTIRE PARCEL _-Sa�-r� 50. FT. -f.0% 1155.45'DIVIDED BY 4 2cf-7.1125' AREA PROP05EP TO Brz MITIOATED THROII 4 Rr=SUB
AVERAI57E EX15TINC7 (qRADE (A.E.e.) TOTAL ALLOCATED Pl%5M SQUARE FEET CONVENTIONAL 5Y4M TEOHNIOLeS, 1'754
LOT COVERA&E AS A PERCENTA(5E LOT AREA k;,.� A r- ')Cz-r 11,3=;, a. = =v7) I I'mi I I DEC OA 71`111h
I_M=7 tl%TKZ:fl% U=�F_W FVM L-V I .1� I 101t t:)UUAMr_ M= 1 12-/2
MAXIMUM ALLOY'tEP HE16HT DEPA "MIENT
9FOR LOVS) 14 5 P6r SQUARE FEET
512.14&ct' ACTUAL RI1;)GE ELEVATION AREA REMANINIS 12,11(a ',Trly OF EDMONDS
r
APPROXIMATE
LOCA11ON
EXISTING
HOUSE
r
<
TOP=268.14
INV=259.98
ZOMIN,E) - RN'33-12 --'/
4'
VEST
4' HOGI�,IRE -- ' -,-m '--�
FILTER' FABRIC
FENCE
(TYP)
CLEARING
I -I M ITS (TYP)
3.2' ViEST
1.0' NORTU
4' VIAINUNK
1.7' SOUTi-I
2.5' WEST
FILTER FABRIC - —
SECURED T 2
0 F�7
14 GA. WIRE BRI�
EQUAL
2' X 2' WOOD OR
EQUIVALENT
0j
8'- 12'
81 FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN
/ CONTI S ROLLS. USE STAPLES
PLACE 3/4'-1,5' WASHED GRAVEL IN OR WINROEURINGS TO ATTACH
THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE. FABRIC TO WIRE,
CD :VWOIRE MESH SUPPORT FEN�E
I
(D
�u T SUPPORT FILTER FAMIC.
to
0
U)
m
— — — — — — — — — - r r
�u (7B;Y BOTTOM OF FILTER
MATERIAL 8' TO 12'
6' MAX.
V)
Li
2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR
EQUIVALENT
CONTRACTOR/ DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE
0)
STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL.
L0
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL
EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE
OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN.
'..-E
0
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
cli
APPROVED BY DATE
0
RLIM I= FM FLM= SWO
41
0
0
DATE
7/24/01 =NTS Dwo No' E1.1
R:\Projects\346 (Kevin
Hanchett)\001-14 (Murata Short Plat)\Dwg\sheets\Final\MR—tgOl.dwg
34x22
NW 1/4, NW 1/4, SECTION 18, TWP. 27 N., RGE. 4 E., W.M. SNOHOMISH IQ, NTY WASHINGTON
Co
2 EX. MH
71 TCP-2162.61
8 — 12 5 INV-274.70
(A, 5� N 0 0 -5 2 -1 -5 0 0 -6)
EX. CO
'fCP=283.55
Ir4V('eI)-252.()5
INV(S)-282.13
1p�)mg
T R 14 T A
%
Z�
V..
10240
DECILLIOUS 10- 100.311",
(OR L
JP OF 4) DAR
CHkRY a'
mt�p OF 3)
(Gr
r\
— A -1 —1 'N
4-
VN��
PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/
EGRESS AREA
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
PROVIDE
EaRESS
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROI
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN.
...-C-7--l-TY Of S—
REVISIONS STANDARD D ETAI L
APPRINED BY I DATE
D. GEBERT 1 10/6/03
DATE
A A
�4-
TOO-283.29
INV(N)-296.23
10'
PRIVATE
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
— UVt-RI-IEAD
UTIUTY
TE
CB
FILTER SOCK WITH
OVER FLOW HOLES
CATCH BASIN
STRAW BALES MAY BE USED IN
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES <SEE
DETAIL E110, THIS APPLICAITON
SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL
TIMES DURING CONSTRUCITON
PERIOD.
CITY INSPECTIO14 REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN.
C-ITY E.-D M 0
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
APPROVED BY DAT
D. GEBERTI 10/06/03
D, GEBERT 1 05/19/05 1 THM9 SIAW TW FM CATM UM
DATE
IS
i
U N P L -4\ T T —r I
CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SPECIALIST
SITE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES
BILL HELSLEY
1724 W. MARINE VIEW DRIVE #140
EVERETT, WA. 98201
(425) 486-6533 ex. 101
bhelsley@sdaengineers.com
LEGEND:
PROPERTY LINE
MMOMMMMO CLEARING/GRADING LIMITS
a 0 FILTER FABRIC FENCE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
13 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR
CATCH BASINS
I � I � 1
14 00 rr
U)
z
0
0:
U)
c
B:
C.)
0 <
4) 0
0 <
Im
Jd
'wj
= 0
C.) <
im
-0 It
4>).
0
Lo
<
os
M
m
4)
o
CO)
a
0
0
z
U.)
C)
4)
0'
0
4)
>
0.'Z
E
0
0
4-
0) (D
(n C
E
a) 3=
-E 0)
r a W>
LU U LO
= CD a)
> V 4— %0
P 5
(L a. coo) LO
_4
(D %0
6
0
-�E
C14
0
z
0
z 'C:'4'
0 COOD
ca 0)
z >
cco,
Uj 0 z
NOTES: 0 m Im CIO <
z I-- m:
0 z
C 0 Ix
1. EXISTING SANITARY SIDE SEWER FOR LOT 2 WILL BE CAPPED AT THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 1 W 2 5:
WHEN NEW SERVICE IS CONNECTED. Uj a w
UI Ir w
2. SEPARATE DEMOLITION PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES.
3. ORANGE BARRIER FENCE AND/OR ORANGE SILT FENCE SHALL BE ADDED ALONG THE EDGE OF THE z
PROJECT TO CLEARLY DELINEATE CLEARING LIMITS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
ALL WORK SU B-J- ECT Law
TO FIELD
GRADING QUANTITIES: F.. . IN I
CUT: 250 CY INSPECTION FOR [�OV 0 4 2014 LL
FILL: 250 CY CODE COMPLANCE DE L -Q'--hVi�;ES C111. AV%L
MONDS
J CITY'017 ED'i
ST t I N
RHO` FILE
%wo
20 0 20 40
1`20) 1
Scale Feet Uj
APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CITY OF EDMONDS
DATE:
BY:
Call 2 Working Days Before You Dig
1-800-424-5555
s n round Loc ion Center
ERING DIVISION 0D,IMTND,0RWA)
Lai m
I q -3 1 b 3ur)��ef 1110-p