18420 HOMEVIEW DR.PDF11772
18420 HOMEVIEW
DR
0 -- - 0
ADDRESS: /
2 F-� �/ A
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:— 0() L4 -7 20
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): Iqqq-oqqq
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS:. gA -Z:50 DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver Study Required R Waiver
K
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED
PERMITS (OTHER):
��O-
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DA
SEWER LID FEE
SHORT PLAT FILE:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S)
GEOTECH REPORT DATED: 17
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
LOT:
LID
BLOCK:
L\TEMP�DS'rs\Fonns\Street File Checklist.doe
STANDAOD DRAINAGE DE'TEN&N SYSTEM
WORKSHEET
OWNM E- CALC BY:
ADDRESS PHONE:
ez- Z> DATE:
**DESIGN DATA
IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE LG ORIFICE
Is 4Z'
OETENTION PIPE LEN(;'rH WASHWE0 (01 VE�
NCH MIN 10" ONG
TOP 0 4 P%R� PIPE TO Of LIVEL
94-67 6'"Itt W`AC9
Rim 64EV I'mt1i r-OVrR 9f.L5 Irpom
2- MAX COVER AtM ELEV— CONTROL
tT
a, OUTLIFT
-jWI1 iota
T4*PEFtFF%K W/CApS
$Lam 4- 0 PIPE MOK
TL
z
OR11FICE RUNOFF SPREADER
INV CLEV1146 - 7
IW 16a11.2L--Z OUTLET
UW0 c4rcoi
Co,~t CArCjy
SASM
2'a 2'xG"DEZP, 4".Ir QUARRY WALLS
"no
�if
92'v 3* DEEP. 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK
SYSTEM CROSS SECTION
:�
—
FROM 'NT4OL
RO L
OUTLET
RECEIVED RIPRAP OUTLET
16- 2 2 1999
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
FOOTING DRAINS SHALL NOT BE CONNECTED 70 DETENTION SYSTEM
NOTES:
a CP
1. Call Engineering Division (771-0220) for a tightline, and detention system inspection
before backfilling and for final inspections.
APPROVED BY
2, Responsibility for operation add maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the
responsibility of the property owner. Mawrial accumulated in the storage pipe must be flushed
out and removed from the catch basins to allow proper operation. Ile outlet control orifice
DA TE
must be ker)t open A all times.
f, 4
PLANNING D
NAME:fe,
SITE ADDRESS: 71,Aii
IZ7
ZONING: PLAN CHK#: 119 - e�221
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CORNERLO (Yes/No) FLA OT A� .(YesINo)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: J::� Left Side: Right Side: /y -Rear:--
Actual Setb cks:
W.- . :
Front: :b , IA44W9: Right Side:-- 44FEF
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE. DETERMINATION ISSUED-- __(Y/N)
d7
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: Actual: zo I/
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: //4
aturn Elevation
Datum Point:
A.D.U. CREATED?: 1 V114
SUBDIVISION:
CRITICAL AREAS
SEPA DETERMINATION: —
LOT AREA:
OTHER:
Plan Review
TOM BELT HOMES PHONE NO. 425 77420% Flu- JOE 35: 55PM P'2
j
Critical Areas Cherki-il.1,
-------- --------------------------
Site laormation� (soil,s/topography/hydrolo,gy/V*(,tge,,at.j,.-V"r,.)
She Address/Locatiow..
2. Property Tax Account Number- 0 . .....
'(acres or square feet); I
3. kpproximate Site Size
4. Is this'sit e currendy develop ed? yes; _X_ no.
If yes; how is 3ite developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that appl-y.
Flat: Jess than 5-f�et elevation change over
Re,11ing: slopes on site generally less than 15'!,'a (i Set -:)i
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
cz ri� o:
MY: slopes present OAsite of more than 150/: mr- a H. t, 0"";, 1. i e
10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33t:o(1i54-et:',.
XSteep: grade s of greater than 30% present on s: "0 (L: v!., c iml rise a f I I.,. C VV 3.
'horizontal-Aistance of less than 334(�et"
Other (please describe):
6. Sile contains &reas of year-round standing water:
7. SiTe contains are as of seas onal standing water
What season(s) of the year?
8. She is in the floodway floodplain E_ nf!] i 11, 0) 12 I'S
q. site contaills a creek or an area where water flows across t�,X;
round? nows are seasonal?
Meadow
10.1 sim. is pri'maril 'y,- forested
ufoan landscaped Gawn,s1h;99'etc) . .....
11. 01)vious wetland is present on site:
V-41"
7:
X184 V
09AA T* MAQU "X_11
U10
/.-A j; 4
4a 3*:X;� kx ".--7- 7--
M AM
4 11 1 1 .4 U..
f: -4; 14 � W-Y
._6
!"V
m;
40 *6 W." a
A. 06
19-
TOM BELT HOMES
0 MCFE NO. 425 7742096
City of Edmonds
CRITICAL AREAS
The Critical Arew Che&Jist contained on. diis form is
W 'be ffiled out by any person preparing a
Development Pern:dt Application fbr *e City of
Edmonds prior to W*er submittal of a development
permit to the Citf.
The purpose of the Cbecklist is to enable City staff to
deft=ine wh0ther my poteatW Critical Areas me, or
may be, p on the subject property. The
information needed to complee tha -Checklist should
be easily available from obsc�ons of the site or
daft available at City HAII (0itical Arm InveUt0fles,
map 8, or wil sumeye'l.
An appl:,,-att :,.i* .,"ltst n1x':;v(:, muft -.511 ci-;A
-fiall ar!"J. it, and xi-binit Ji' to the
City. .,ity vd.01 i-!'� k I: ie ;;held�'[:Ist' C.11ke a
pricurso.'*v drtrnni1iW.-.'on & tht-
permi I: oppit:
Ple-aso S1.1b.-M-1 91 oil;:" 'Aitn ti-te 3:Ved
Copy t:,f ',:Cj ;%,�.J:,;1 :it, sti-iff in -.-Iridir* ,m(;.
lotating tbe six.c."RC -I' V descnt'ed 0�
this 6m.- :.",a ap ?hc ant. '-nal", b:11AI*
shj-,plan, topoglaphy
other '-'er."
map, t,.I'.c."f cv., r%.dirs ixi,-.: ii:-cdt n -;-,ith -Ods Chec"UA-
to IWIR)BI itaj— in ;,,:: vjllf �;n'[ :Ilei:- pirvIi-tilawy
assess, caell.r. o I'I.n, :;fte
-ld M. fa !13,
--n! tjeai the ..Ire t
I have completed the aftebad Critical Arm Checklist and Fru .4 1 iti h$
ben of my knowledge (fffl out 1he iWopriate column belowi.
.Ovmer/Applican t.-
Name
Stmet Addrm
city Isfale zip
LL -/71 — .2.2= -0 -
Talapbone
IV
01L.
Date
Mane
stl�et
city
Telephone
Daft
I
i,!Dver)
=""R=ww-dM
PHONE 'NO. : 425 774-01)96
JO11 BELT HOMES
Z!"Ot 35:�GW P'l
f
F
E
11
City of Edmono's
Critical Areas Detcrrrdn.,�Eif)'.,
Applican Tom l5elt Determ4natiotl 1::
RrqJect N
Site Location: V2cant. 4776-000-0.0003-
Project Description: Non Project Specific
Determination: Study Required:
During review and inspection of the above noted site, it was I :mt thc: ;; ii: car; to co! mlin
andlor Is adjacent to a Steep Slope Hazard Area pursua3t p 1-,,[ 21:..] f'"'B r1clAs
Community Development Code (E=. To deterrnin,-. if a !'k,lie
C*. I r.0
a top0grapbic survey must be prepared by a licensed Land
is defined as inclhwion of 40 percent or more within -.i -1,-!11 il::0 east
20feet A slope. is delinaatedby*establishing its toe and
inclinadon over * at least.70 feet of vertical relief.' (ECDC E ixt ion I 5B. 1) 5 (:,or
- 1. q -x
buffer, plus a-15-foot building setback is required from the 7"," 5 - . is
the boundaries of thetop andtoe and the buffer/setbackwill 13,! ic, -!- -: r:ir.,�Acr
Oncethe m.ftical areais identified and the buffer/setbac*...cs
optiors wre available.
1. 'The 50-foot buffer requirement maybe reduced to 10 foet :,-;;* u
licensed geologist or geotechnical engincer,which
buffer altewtion will haveno adverse impactupon fne -.-JV--- 11-.j:i 1:itt,kc a:-
2. If the requiret�ents for buffer and. setback mnder the
reportsupports deveIopment of the site, a Reasonab*]e Ust: an *1 1. -X. UW,
obtainedm suant to ECDC 20.15B.170A and 20.35B-040:'..
KAdasa, ampto 0 �,f Wa— 6"'t
NWw
BELT HOMES
PHONE NO. : 425. : 774'2�% Fei.;., 2 2iaffi 05:'4-z'iPM P5
-(jVj C . i 691J.
CITY. OF - EDMONDS
121 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMON0S,.WA%= - QL25)7:*,42;!'.'
DEVELOPMiNT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning * Building - Engin eering
May 13,1999
Tf
'Im
P.O. Box 314
Edrnonde, WA 98M
'.AE-.-- cidiing offile No. V-W204
DearTom,
Bic RCEAF% F.4HF�'
. W-YOF
Staff has reviewed your letter requesting closuk, 011110
Exception and VMance file for theproperty locited at I Honi ev e; if "Drive.
we wncur with the findings of1mLoveg-Saued-3nd su ro-i �, mc-give--1 P't 1 t 1,tiLy
I goo which identifies the area of 40% slope, only a slivei-A ��Nch, *n'ii�:', Is t1W
critical area criteria. The file also . contains the lettei. provilro.- by &t j.ic:, P E, ig
HWA Geo.Sciences Inc.,. which states the critical arps 9C
from 50, fW. down lo 10 feeL
upon obtaining this information, you.have deterTnirt(xi "ha' a singWi r:iiv- i)*
r.'I R%1; -,I:: I - :: i - j wid
resido,rice oan be constnided which meets both tho sivindt'i,
iapi i-i nc.
the critical area setbacks. withoutthe requested varla P
longer receewN and the City w1jI proceed to cloaro *-13-` i I
Due to star tkne'spent routiing your application to cthirr Cit'i'de
Airg -it:
review for c*rnpleterws, a 60% refund of the ojiginal$'102 I.W D10,
You will be receiving the refund by mail Inft ocorning -nit
application my be made at any time. SO $UrG W tric P
pertnent information regarding the criticW area wip, y(jij 1, ptj�:-jr fttal 'or
the building permit reviewo Please feel free to contact 11* it 11ou
ques0ons.
Kafisse Kawamoto
incorpbra" August 11,
Sister City � H�kjnar,,
APR-14-00 FRI 03:11 PM FAX,NO, IIJ, U3
Rer gman Associates, InC,
Geotechnical and Environmental.Consulting
J-488
July 21, 1999
Tom Belt Homes
P,O. Box 314
Edmonds, Washington 98020
r
Attention: Mr, Tom Belt �51 rjEET FILE
Subject-, Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
Proposed Residential Development RECEIVED
Olympic View Drive & Home View Drive
Edmonds, Washington MAR 4 2005
Dear Mr. Belt, PERMIT COUNTER
This report presents the results of our geotechnioal evaluation for the property located at
Olympic View Drive and Home View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. These services are being
performed in accordance with our proposal dated July 8, 1999.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located northwest of the intersection:of Olympic View Drive and
Home View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. The sloped property i's currently undeveloped and
covered with fir and deciduous trees with an understory of brush and weeds.
We understand that the proposed development will involve the construction of a
residential home and associated driveway. The house will be of conventional wood -framed
construction with a daylight basement, Access to the residence will be from Home View Drive.
We understand that the finished grade of the lower floor will be at an elevation of approximately
94 feet, or at the elevation of the lower portion of the existing lot.
PU.R.POSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this evaluation was to explore shallow subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions at the site and to provide geotechnical recommendations for design and construction
of the residential development. The evaluation focused on the portion of the lot where the house
is planned. We understand that, per the Edmonds Community Development Code, a geotechnical
assessment of the site is required prior to issuing building permits. The site has slopes in excess
of 2:1 (HV). Our specific scope of services has included:
19231 36'A Avenue West, Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 -330A
HrK-14-UU M UJ:1? FM FAX NO. P. 04
Tom Belt homes 1-488
Residential Development July 21, 1999
Edmonds, Washington Page 2
1. Review information available in our riles regarding geologic conditions in the site
vicinity.
2. Complete a reconnaissance of the site.
3. Explore subsurface soil and ground water conditions by observing four shallow backhoe
excavated test pits within the planned residential building area. The test pits were
excavated prior to our field visit.
4. Supplement the test pit excavations by hand augering and performing Dynamic Cone
Penetration (DCP) tests in three of the test pits and hand augering an additional hole
near the northwest comer of the planned residence.
5. Provide geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the development, This
includes an assessment of slope stability. Recornmendations are provided for site
preparation, earthwork, foundations, drainage, and pavement subgrade preparation.
5. Prepare a written report which contains our conclusions and recommendations, along
with the supporting fiel4 data.
SITE CONDITIONS
The soils at the property are mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam in the 1983
U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Survey, "Soil Survey of Suohomish County Area Washington". The
Alderwood is described as a deep soil developed in glacial till. Included in the Alderwood are
small areas of 6ther soil units including the Indianola loamy sand. The Indianola is described as
a very deep soil that formed in glacial outwash, Based on our observations of the on -site soils,
we interpret the near surface soils to be a part of the Indianola loamy sand.
The property is located on a south -facing slope. Slopes on the property are steeper on the
northern portion of the lot and shallower on the southern portion. Based on our site
re connaissance and the topographic survey of the property you provided us, slopes in the planned
building location vary from 2.25- 1 (H:V) near the northern portion, to less than 4:1 in the
southern portion.
19231 36tAvenue West, Suite 11201
ZjppeK Zemnn Aegocishm- Inc.
Lynnwood, Washingt0ft 98036
(425) 771 — 3304
J489,bult.0799
APR-14-00 FRI 03:12 PM FAX NO, P, 05
0
Tom Belt homes J-488
Residential Development July 21, 1999
Edmonds, Washington Page 3
No evidence of deep-seated slope movement was observed during our site
reconnaissance. However, the upper soils on the slope 6onsisted of loose colluvium (slope wash)
which is indicative of soil creep and erosion. Springs, seeps or wet areas were not observed on
the hillside at. the time of our reconnaissance.
Subsurface conditions were explored by observing the soils exposed in four shallow test
pits excavated by you prior to our field visit on July 8, 1999. The test pits were concentrated in
the central and southern portions of the planned house location. On July 12, 1999, Zipper Zeman
Associates, Inc. utilized three of the test pit excavations to extend hand auger holes to depths
betwecn 5 and 6 feet below the ground surface. Dynamic cone penetration tests were performed
in the holes to assess soil density characteristics. One additional hand auger hole was advanced
near the northwest comer of the planned itsidence. The approximate locations of the test
pits/hand auger holes are shown on the attached site plan (Figure 1).
A poorly developed topsoil, zone consisting of dark brown, loose, moist, silty fine sand
with some gravcl was encountered below the surface. The topsoil extended to depths between 9
and 18 inches in the test pits/hand auger holes. Orange -brown to gray, loose, moist, fine to
coarse sand with some gravel was encountered below the topsoil. The loose sand is interpreted
to be colluvium, The loosc sand extended to depths of 3.5 to 5 feet in the test holes. Medium
dense, moist, fine to coarse sand was observed below the loose sand. The medium dense sand
extended to *the bottom of the test holes. Copies of the test pit/hand auger boring logs are
attached to this report.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
No indications of deep-seated slope instability were observed on the property. Slope
creep and erosion in the form of near surfacc colluvium (slope wash) soils were evident,
Provided proper construction techniques are utilized, it is out opinion that the construction of the
planned residence will not adversely affect the overall stability of the slope. Due to the granular
soils observed, groundwater is anticipated to dissipate through the subsurface soils.
We recommend that the vegetation and topsoil be stripped from the building and
pavement areas. All tree stumps and roots more than 2 inches in diameter should be grubbed and
removed from these areas.
ZIRRSr Uman Asiggiates. Inc,
19231 3NO Avenue West, suite B201 Lynnwood. Washington 98036 (42S) 771 - 3304
1488,beit,0799
APR-14-00 FRI 03:13 PH FAX NO, P. 06
Tom Belt homes 0 0 J-488
ResidentW Development July 21, 1999
Edmonds, Washington Page 4
Hased on our conversations with you, the northern portion of the'residence will require
cuts on the order of 8 to 10 feet, and the existing suiface is near 'the Planned subgrade in the
southern portion of the planned house, The soil conditions observed in the test holes indicate
that the footings and floor slabs in the northern portion of the house will be founded on the
medium dense sand. Loose sand in the southern portion of the planned residence was observed
to extend to approximately 3,5 feet below the existing ground surface. To reduce the potential
for differential settlement of footings and floor slabs caused by spanning across soils of variable
density, we recommend that the loose* colluvial subgrade sand in the building site that underlies
footing and floor slabs be compacted to a minimum of 92 percent of the maximum dry density in
accordance with the ASTM D-1557 test. method. Alternatively, the loose soils should be
t..rem.oved below all footings. Sof� loose or otherwise unsuitable areas identified during site
preparation shbu'ld be repaired to a firm non -yielding condition. A representative of Zipper
CD Zeman Associates, Inc. should be present to assess the suitability.of subgrade soils.
--------------
Where necessary, new fill in building and pavement areas should be placed as compacted
structural fill following subgrade preparation as described above. The fill should be placed in
horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness. Each lift should be conditioned to the
proper moisture content and uniformly compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition using
mechanical equipment, All structural fill placed in building areas, and within the upper 2 feet in
pavement areas, should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD)
as determined by the ASTM D-1 557 test method. Below a depth of two feet in pavement areas,
the structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 92 percent of the (MDD). This applies
to all utility; -trench backfill as well. Non-structural fill placed in landscape areas need only be
compacted to the extent required for construction equipment traffic support.
All structural fill should be free of organic matter, debris, and other deleterious material,
with no individual particles larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension, The suitability of soil
for use as structural fill will depend on its gradation and moistur content. As the a o t of
0 C m un
fines (material passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly
more sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more
difficult to achieve, The subsurface fine to coarse sand encountered in the test holes should be
suitable for use as all-weather fill.
Imported structural fill placed during wet weather should consist of free draining sand
and gravel containing less than 10 percent fines by weight relative to the fraction of the material
passing the 1/4-inch sieve. Imported structural fill may contain a higher fines content for
Placement during dry weather provided that the moisture contents are near optimum during
compaction.
We recommend that permanent cut slopes in the native soils are inclined at a maximum
inclination of 2:1 (H:V). Temporaly construction cut slopes should cc o t Unifo
11f rM 0 rm
Building Code (UBQ and/or local construction codes. Shoring of temporary cut slopes is not
anticipaited to be necessary based on the soil conditions observed in the test holes. However,
provisions for shoring should be incorporated into construction plans should subsurface
19231 30 Avenue West, Suite B201
711kAOr 7eman AnrodatokA -Inc,
Lynn -cod, washingtort 98036
(425) 771 — 3304
ABS.balt.0799
APR-14-00 FRI 03:13 PH �AX NU. K Uf
Tom Belt homes J-488
Residential Development July 21, 1999.
Edmonds, Washington Page 5
conditions vary from those observed in the test holes. Pemarient c I ut slopes should be
revegetated as soon as possible to reduce erosion and the susceptibility to sloughing.
Constructed slopes for driveway or foundation support should be keyed or benched into
the existing slope. The top, outer edge of the constructed slope should be designed to provide a
minimum separation of 10 feet from foundations and 5 feef from pavement surfaces, We
recommend that the outer slope be constructed at a maximum inclination of 2:1 (MV). Existing
soils below the constructed slope that are loose or.disturbed should be excavated down to the
medium dense sand. The exposed subgrade should be prepared as described above, We
recommend that the base of the excavated area be graded with a reverse (into the hillside) slope
of I to 2 percent to provide a key for the fill. Structural fill can than be placed and compacted as
recommended above.
It is our opinion that the earthwork can be accomplished with conventional construction
equipment. We recommend that construction occur during the drier months of the year. If
construction must occur during wet weather, it may be necessary to overexcavate wet, disturbed
material and replace with crushed rock or a clean layer of sand and gravel (less than 5 percent
fines) to provide a reasonable working surface and help protect exposed subgrades.
The site has moderate slopes and the potential for erosion and sloughing of exposed soils
is significantly increased during wet weather, Erosion control measures are recommended during
construction to reduce the potential impacts to adjacent areas. Erosion control measures should
be designed to prevent downslope sediment movement. Silt fences and diversion structures
should be incorporated to control runoff and sediment transport Temporary erosion protection
(e.g. straw, plastic) should be placed on exposed soils during construction. Permanent
groundcover should be established as soon as possible on exposed soils.
We recommend that all spread footings for the structures be founded on the medium
dense, fine to coarse sarid encountered at the test hole locations between 3.5 and 5.0 feet below
the surface or on a zone of compacted soil or fill as described in the Site Preparation section. All
footing excavations should be observed by a representative of Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc, to
confinn that suitable bearing soils have been exposed. Keyways should be incorporated into the
footings to provide resistance to lateral movement.
. I . The depth of embedment below lowest adjacent finished grade for all exterior and
interior footings should be at least 18 inches and 12 inches, respectively. We reconunend a
minimum footing width of 18 inches for continuous wall footings and 24 inches for isolated
column footings. For footings desigiied and coh§ftucTtidiicdfding th-theitiovi einiina, .. we
L-recomm.ended an allowable bearing capacity of 2500 pounds per square foot This value applies
to the total . of aft ifii W6& 16f the footing and any
overlying backfill. The allowable bearing value may be increased by one-third for non -sustained
live loads such as wind or seismic.
7JUpar ZaMon AnnefstaL inr_
1923136"' Avenue West, Suite B201 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 — 3304
Y488.belt,0790
HPN-14-UU MI U�:14 FM MX NU,
WW Tom Belt homes 0 0 J-488
Residential Development July 21, 1999
Edmonds, Washington Page 6
The settlement of footings supported as recommended is.expected to be on the order of 1
inch or less. Differential settlements are expected to be less than 1/2 inch over'a distance of 30
feet. Most of the anticipated settlements are expected to occur rapidly as loads are applied.
Loose or disturbed soils not removed from the footing excavatio'ns prior to pouring concrete may
result in increased settlement, The soils observed are not considered to be compressive or
expansive.
The northern portion of the residence will have below grade walls. We recommend that
an equivalent fluid density of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for at -rest conditions, and 40 pcf for
active conditions be utilized in the design of the walls. The at -rest conditions should be used
where no movement (deflection) of the top of the wall is allowed. Active conditions can be used
where deflections of 1/100 of the height of the wall are acceptable. For footings founded in
accordance with ow, recommendations, the allowable frictional resistance may be computed
using a coefficient of friction of 0.40 applied to the dead load forces. 'Me allowable passive
resistance. on the sides of footings may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 225
pounds per cubic foot for a level -ground surface. The above coefficient of friction and
equivalent fluid density values both include a factor of safety of about 1.5.
r
The -slab -on -grade floors should be founded on pre -rolled native ground or structural fill
per our recommendations outlined previously. We recommend that the floor slab be underlain by
a minimum of 6-inches of clean sandy gravel, crushed rock or pea gravel to serve as a drainage
layer, capillary break and working surface. The fines content of the capillary break should be
limited to 5 percent or less, by weight, when measured on the minus % inch sieve fraction. An
impervious moisture barrier should be installed beneath the slab.
Pavements
The design and construction of driveways . should conform to current City of Edmonds
standards. We recommend that the subgrade for pavement areas be prepared as recommended in
the Site Preparation section of this report, The upper one -foot of subgrade soils should be
compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with the
'ASTM D-1557 test method. Finish subgrade surfaces should be constructed to facilitate
'drainage and prevent ponding of water below the pavement section. We recommend a layer of
crushed base course be placed between the prepared subgrade or structural fill, and the pavement
working surface material (asphalt or concrete). The base course should be compacted to at least
95 percent of the maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557. The thickness of base course and
working surfhce material should be based on local codes.
19231 36'h Avenue West. Suite B201
Zipper Zeman Associgteg- Inc.
Lynnwood, Washington 99036
(425) 771 — 3304
1488.belt,0799
APR-14-00 FRI 03:14 PM FAX NO. P. 09
Tom Belt homes
Residential Development J-488
Edmonds, Washington July 21, 1990
Page 7
Site grading and the construction of impervious structures (e.g. roofs, pavement areas)
will alter drainage in the development area. We recommend that Site grading allow for positive
drainage away from foundations and roadways. The concentrated runoff from impervious
surfaces should be directed to appropriate storm water discharge receptors and not allowed to
flow down slopes. Concentrated storm water flow on slopes can lead to excessive erosion and
compromise the stability of the slope,
Runoff from the roof should not be concentrated and allowed to flow over slopes. We
recommend that roof runoff be collected in tightline pipes and directed to a suitable discharge
receptor.
All backfilled walls surrounding the Structure should be provided with subsurface
drainage. To protect walls and floors from moisture and to avoid the buildup of hydrostatic
'pressurcs, we recommend that the backfill material within 36 inches outside backfilled walls and
1..q�!eq4iqg the ftill-height of the wall consist of clean, free -draining sand and gravel. Washed or
screened -gravel could be substituted for sand and gravel drainage material, provided filter fabric
is placed to separate the washed gravel from adjacent site soils of fill. The backfill should be
sealed at the ground surface with a minimum of I foot of impervious soil in any unpaved areas to
prevent surface water from entering directly into the wall backfill. Final site grades should be
designed to 6aTry water away from the structure in order to prevent it from accumulating and
ponding next to the structure.
At the base of backfilled walls, we recommend providing footing drains. The footing
drains (with cleanouts) should consist of perforated pipe, sloped to drain, with perforations
placed down. The free-&aining backfill adjacent the backfilled walls should be continuous and
envelop the footing drains for at least 6 inches in all directions, Roof drains should not be
connected to the subdrains,
USE OF THIS REPORT
We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Tom Belt Homes and their agents
with respect to the proposed residential development northwest of the intersection of Olympic
View Drive and Home View Drive in Edmonds, Washington. The recommendations presented
ifi this report are intended to be used to assist in the design of the proposed residence.
If there are any changes in the loads, grades, location or configuration of the proposed
residence, our firm should be notified so that we may confirm the geotechnical recommendations
presented in this report, or modify these recommendations if appropriate. When the design has
been finalized, we recommend that the final design drawings and specifications be reviewed by
our firm to see that our recommendations have been interpreted and implemented as intended.
19231 361� Avenue West, Suite B201
Ziping Zeman AssocJgtgs__1ne,
Lynnwood..Washington 99036
(425) 771 — 3304
J488.beft,0799
HrK-14-UU M UJ;1b Vn FAX NO. P. 10
Tom Belt homes 0 0 J-488
Residential Development JuJy 21, 1999
Edmonds, Washington Page 9
There are possible variations in subsurface conditions across the sit*e and also with time.
A contingency for unexpected conditions should be ineluded in the project budget and schedule.
Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation should be provided by our firm during con-
struction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the
explorations, to provide recorhmendations for design changes should the conditions revealed
during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and
foundation installation actMties comply with the contract plans and specifications.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in
accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared, No
warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood.
We trust that this report meets your present needs. If you have any questions or if we can
be of further assistance, please call. I
Respectfully submitted,
ZIPPER ZEMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Timothy H. Roberts, P.G.,
Project Engineer
John E. Zipper, P.E.
President
Enclosures: Figure 1, Site Plan
Test Pit/Hand Auger Boring Logs
Gradation Curve
I F-WAk-11 =.- ,
Zillsterz Tne-
1923136"4 Avenue Wcst, Suite B201 LYnnwaad. WDshinetan 98036 (425) 771 — 3304
1499.belt.0799
APR-14-00 FRI 03:15 PM
FA9 NO.
Adak
Pl—AN'
4 Q9
to 40
to,
13
RA -2
RA-1
FICIT4.91 BAR 674
At.6 COUP 04),u
0
V
ILQ
9z a-T—SaL. -
f%, V�
EXPLANATION
HA-1
(g HAND AUGER NUMBERAND APPIZOMMATE LOCATION
SCALE 111, = 30"
30 15 0 30 60
SCALE IN FEET
I
ZIPPER ZEMAN ASSOCIATES INC. PROJECT NO-1-489 PROYECT NAME:
DATE: luly 13, t999 Torn Btlt Hotirm
DRAWN BY: JLW l,0t 50 110moview Addition 2
GEOTE, CHNICAL A9D EWRON MENTAL scAu: r-w Edmonds. W&Aington
CONSULTING
FIGURA I - SITE AND MLORATION PLAN
REFERENCF., SITE PLAN TAKEN FROM TOM BELT HOMES SITE PIAN AND ZZA FIELD MFASURZMZM.
HrK—lq—UU rKI uj;iu rn HX NO, P. 12
ZIWER ZEMAN ASSOCIATO INC.
19231 36"',Ave. W, Suite B20 1, Lynnwood, Wuhington 9SO36
Text PitmAnd
- -AugeK Boring HAJ
Project: Tom Belt Homes
Location: Edmonds, WA.
Project No! J-488
Approximate ground surface elevation (feet):
Date Excavated July 12 199 9
Depth Material Description
00
Z
Z
cose, moist, dark brown, silty fineRAND with some gravel. (Topsoil)
...... . ..... . ...... . . ................. ........... . . . ... ....................... . . . . ......................
Loose, moist, orange to brown, fine to coarse SAND witb some gravel
2 (Colluv'wn)-
3
F— .. . ...... .. . ...... ................... .... . ............................ - — - -------- . ......
4 Medium dense, mois� orange to brown, fine to coarse SAND with some
gravel.
19 S-1
5
I Bloring Completed at 4 feet 10 inches on 6/26/99. No groundwater
I
encountered at time of excavation.
65 6
7
9
10
HVK-14-UU �Ki W:lb VII �AX NO, P. 13
ZIVIER ZEMAN ASSOCIATIO INC.
1923136' Ave, W, Sojile 8201, Lynnwood, Wasbingron 9go36
191 PItfRRQd.A=r DoEiny, R&-2
Project: Tom Bolt Homes
Location: Edmonds, WA- Project No: 1-488
Approximate ground surface elevation (feet): Date Excavated july 12, 1999
Depth Material Description
(ft)
'S 0.
Loose, moist, dark brown, silty fine SAND with �orne gravel. (Topsoil)
.. . .......... .... ...... .................
- Loose, moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND with some gmvel (Colluvium).
2
3
. . . ... .......................... .. . ........... ........... ................ . . .. . .............. . . . .... . ..... . ......... . . ....
4 Medium dense, moist, brown, fine to coarse SAND with some gravel.
33 S-1
6
7 Boring completed at 6 feet on 7/12/99, No groundwater encountered at
fitne of excavation.
8
9
10
APR-14-00 FRI.03:16 PH FAX NO. P. 14
ZEMAN ASSOCIATES9 U.
Z171W361* Ave. W. Suitc B20 1, Lyfmwood, W"not,
Tesi Pit/Hand Aliggr Boring HA,-3
Project: Tom Beit Homes
LocatLon: Edmonds, WA, Project No. J-488
Approx6nate ground sarface elevation (feet)- Date Excavated July 12, 1'999
Depth Material Description &
P P.
-4
Loose, moist, dark brown, silty fine S�ND with some gravel, (Topsoil) I
. . ..... .......... . . . ..............
— Loose, moist, brown to gray, fine to COUSC SAND with some gravcl
2 (Colluvium).
3
......... . . ... —.-I ................... ...............
4 Medium dense, moist, brown to gray, fine to coarse SAND with some
gravel.
6
7 1 Boring completed at 6 feet on 7/12/99. No groundwater encountered at
time of excavation.
F R, 0 3 1 PIN FAX NO.
ZIOER ZEMAN ASSOCIATEONC.
19231361! Ave..W. Suite B201, Lynnwood, Wailtington 98036
t'I 5
NW&ORA
Project Tom Belt Homes
Lbeadon-, Ediiionds, WA. Project No: J-488
Approximate ground surf2ce ellevadon (feet): Date Excavated July 12,1999
Pit
711 P"
Depth
MSWW Ikscriodon
S
!z
Udie."moigr,* orange to brow6i silty finev co SANWAtithsoMe
gravel. (Topsoil) V
............... G ...... . . . ........
!
Loose, moist, brown to gray, fine to coarse SAND with some gravel
(Colluyium). 7 S-I
4
4. S.
W!I171,101 ol
9
I t 9 1
10
Medium dense, moist, brown to gyray, fine to coarse SAND with some S-3
gravel.
Boring completed at 6 feet on 7/12/99. No groundwater encountered at
time of excavation.
APR-14-00 FRI 03:17'PM FAX NO.
Ad
CRNN VZE DISTRIBUTMN ASTM 0422,
,Hill
11111
1
1111111
11111
1000.00 100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01 0.00
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
BOULDERS
0088LES
Coarse TAne
009me I Medium
Fine'
Sdt
C30V
GRAVEL
SAND
FINE GRAINED
Exploration
Sample
Depth (feet)
Moisture
Fines
Description
HA-4
2
4
5.0
2.6
SAND with trace
Gravel and Silt
ZIPPER ZEMAN ASSOCIATES. INC PROJECT NO, J488 PROJECT NAME:
DATE OF TESTING: July 14.1990 Tom Belt Homes
GCOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL - Edmonds, WA
CONSULTING L I
--------------
'90 -D, A YS
CITY OF EDMONDS
SIDE
SEWER
PERMIT
'9 go 19"
PERMIT
0070
Address of Construction: 94?-6 e
v te DK
Property Legal Description (Include all easements): t rf L� V I L�.
17- bE r- i t� I u
Owner and/or Contractor:
State License No._10 t'�-i \P, )R 14 L M Building Permit No. 2 7 0
Single Family Invasion into City Right-of-Way:,X No kEP;W0_0D LINE]:
11 Multi -Family (No. of Units
D Commercial
0 Public
RW Construction Permit No.
Cross other Private Property: WiNo 11 Yes
Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement
I certify that I have read and shall comply with ail city requirements
as indicated on the back of the Permit Card.
9
Date
* CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION *
OFFICE UsE:'.ONLY.
FOR INSPECTION CALL 771-=2, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
Permit Fee: Zle Issued By CM
C_:A M___
Trunk Charge: Date Issued:
Assessment Fee: Receipt No.:
Lid No.:
Partial Inspection: Date -Initial
Comments
Reason Rejected: Date -Initial -
Final Inspection Approved: Date initial
** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE **
White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3190
��^��w J��|
The City of -'-- ----' -'----"� '
NEW CONSTRUCTION Rr REPAIRS [] LID NC1 .................. /ASM7.NO . ..................
OWNER......................................... ---------------------------- ------------------------- CONTRACTOR ...................... ................. .......... -------------------------------- PERMIT NO.
.
JOB ADDRESS--..J'.����..���� LEGAL , LOT NO ---.----........ BLOCK NO . ....................................
/ ��
.-------------__'-_-._-^---------'--'-.-.-''--_--_.---_-.._'----
/
/
/ NAME OF ADDITION ........ -............... -_-.--_--_--'_--.-__---'_-.-'--_--_.
171
' dV'
't
d'
!
�
/
/
�
/
/
/
/
/
/
'
/ ~n~
'-
\ '' 4f-
^L;^ne_��e,c~�}r^^�� s '=
'oc'
...e
Water Service Drawing
The City of Edmonds
EASEMENTNO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION [:3 REPAIRS n LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
T NO-99P.49.9
OWNEP. ................................................................................................ CONTRACTOR .................... .............................................................. PERMI
t.
JOB ADDRESS J.$LN20 ..... ]DR. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ....................................
........... ........ ..................................
NAMEOF ADDITION ..: .....................................................................................................................
10MEVI-evj L,4�
Approved:
.............. B, .......................
PMV-0001 -11(75 (REV.1. 1/78) DATE J9 .... ...
C
1 Ly
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT Permit Number-
Lcsue Date: !;Emm /9'�
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction-, 7-6 HQ Y% E_ V I M'S/ D
B. Type of Work (be specific): c— uL vi a 9-T 66 L-r—
C. Contractor: -Tom P.-
Mailing Address: Pb :&I L"I>M 0 V
State License #: _r0 M S V4 39 12- 1 M J
. �j A\0
D. Bu'ilding Permit #,(if applicable): "W
Contact: M e� L-=.
Phone: 4:0k 7 �f - 1:7 1- 0
Liability Insurince: )L&;:S Bond: $ Con
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. Commercial O'Subdivision F
City Project E] Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE� WATER)
Multi -Family �4 Single Family EJ Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR:
F. Pivement or Concrete Cut-- 0 , Yes U14o G. Size of Cut: x H. Chargq�,$
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this applicati�n to hold the City of Edmonds ha�mlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseep� that may be made against the City of Edihonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and atiorn'eyfees by reason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THEPINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT
Two sets of constructiondrawings of proposed work required.,with perm t app,lipti
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Enizineermp giv(46n 7711�!o 20
Work and materi al iX A
,�,be inspected during progress and atTJm6Qfio'n
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accorapricie witA F/61ity regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphaikr City a 'i' ved material prior to the end of the working day;
p p 170
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be
available on i . teat all timesforiiispe t . o poses
signature: Date:
(Contractor or Agt-nt)
CALL DIAL, -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY.
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER 110 DAYS
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
V
RIGHT OF WAY FEE: 2
DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I 11:
RESTORATION FEE:
T OTAL FEE:
RECEIPT NO.:
ISSUED BY
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO, PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Di� 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES
I Comments:
I Diagram
(Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.)
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
TO m
v I
c- AV
fl, AS, t i#ry E:VLA 6 a WO A WOZ
e so
�j v 0 v P
rK S Lit M Orr
P LAtJ
v IA,�-- I 0.1�j. c4
tz, 4z, IQ 77
2 1999
VCLOPMENTSERVICE
CITY OF EDMONj) S CTFJ..
s
T R F, E
17
A
44
A4 -t- —Z, U + 7 c6 4
Irl
G)N)P, �v G
0
S -7 Lf
K) V-E \-j A
-t- 3.S4
I-T
t 1,3+ A
CY
27
oc) 7- IV-j6s
x
\A/At-L
To T
Ipw -ro
*'-4 C. 18 913
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 57H AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
May 13,1999
Tom Beft
P.O. Box 314
Edmonds, WA 98020
'RE: - Closing of Ffle No. V-98.204
Dear Tom,
RECEIVED
JUL 2 2 1.20`100
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR,
CITY OF EDMONDS
9A)?a4RA FAHEY
MAYOR
Staff has reviewed your letter requesting closure of the Reasonable Use
Exception and Variance file for the property located at 18418 Horneview Drive.
We concur with the findings of the Lovell-Sauerland survey received February 3,
1999 which identifies the area of 40% slope, only a sliver of which meets the
critical area criteria. The file also contains the letter provided by Sa Hong, P.E. of
HWA GeoSciences Inc,, which states the critical area buffer may be reduced
from 50 feet down to 10 feet.
Upon obtaining this information, you have determined that a single family
residence can be constructed which meets both the standard RS-12 zoqlng and
the critical area setbacks without the requested variances.-Tf�— no
longer necessary and the City will proceed to close the file.
Due to staff time spent routing your application to other City departments and
review for completeness, a 50% refund of the original $132 filing fee Is possible.
You will be receiving the refund by mail in the coming weeks. A building permii
application may bemade at any time. Be sure to include this and any other
pertinent Information regarding the critical area with your submittal package for
the building permit review. Please feel free to contact me if you have any
questions.
Karissa Kawamoto,
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
)GH—r CALC-�
51TE P
I-OT so HoM9LVI9Z%V )ktiotJ
CITY OP
W4 Avc GOt�E
AT' .9fl. MAX
ml. 63" okc-,rvAt-
Itom 6- s
I I\j G
1010
:,00"0
94-
4;a-
V.,Pk lEt;,,
JL
"qw, '40, MOS....
. A- s
Sr
T M.H.
Rim 93.977 NIM al
I(VV 19
OL'Y fi Pic
CALC��
T�_ 1913-Ob
C-1,TY Ole ftt�mo.wb-a
WO*
isf -&for. OiA X
AT. , ISLVLO
ro "o.
100,
"'r '000.,
0_11
001,
10,
loo 00, owl
loll io* od
0_0
105/
I
27,
CO
4ty
fv
Lit, 9:3.-%7
City of Edmonds Permit No:-/
RIGHT—OF—WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT , issueDate: fel'/_/o
A. Address or Vicinity of Const�uction: 05
B. Type of Work (be specific): Al C-0 -7-utC770 A-/ 7-4- CIC-770
t,51 7-
C. Contractor: Qontact: -77-f
Mailing Addres s 7 P.0 '13 o fhone: 24,,r
7Z
State License #: -ro,,tl p_,6 Liability Insurance: 'Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. F� Commercial E] Subdivision El city Project I�UC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD)
F] Multi-Faimily §ingle Family F� Other
INSPECTOR-'!'W)P/7-C-,'/7_7_
F. PAVEMENT: E] YES NO G. SIZE OF CUT7_8 /D x H. Charge: $
CONCRETE CUT: E] YES NO
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
1DEMNITY.- Applicant understands by hislher signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmlessftom injuries,
damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or
any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and
attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A,4ERJOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS
COMPLETED BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICHTIMEA DEBITOR CREDIT WILL BEPROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT.
* Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. , Every
flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verifying completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All street -cut trench work shall be. patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the en(r4 the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS.
4 Three sets - of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application.
I HA VE READ THE ABO VE STA TEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENT'v AND ACKNO WLEDGE
THA T I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMIT A VAILABLE ON SITE A T ALL TIMES FOR S ECTIONS
Vignature: r Date: 0/ 7
7' P
(Contractor or Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE -ONLY
Approved.,by:'. Right-of-way Fee: 176)
Time Authoriied Void After '7 /Zb '/00 Disruption Fee/Fund I 11:'
Special,Conditions:
FeRL Pc ',v a,,14 A10J V_J Restoration Fee:
Total Fee:
Receipt No:
Issued by:
UPON COMPLETION OF.PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE.
FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK.
INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE:
For inspection requirements see Engineering Information Handout.
WEIGHT CALC,�
51TE F1,AN A Ta. 0 6
Homr-vlitw )kj>ow 1 6 q3-4--S'
C.i*rY ap L-1>MowbS 109.1000
W4
AT"
(L I VI - S* okc-r v is I-
M
4c,
NO
-�c
I!E�AQ I— TO A 0 C-:.
P,-/ go cl
t- A 1-70
loe
7roMA.L-
Ila
GLE 9
CIS-- TV
9't .19
I it
Vw, Lill he's
A\
Sropv-1
T
vq .9-�!
INV ig"
C)L'-/ M P.1
OIL a 5 fw 41
4VIG H L C,�
5 ITE P.Ak
ISTRUL
C.I-ry cq* e1>mawbz
wo. APP!RPV PL NT1Wt-,. GOtoE
AT'
.4-1. MAx
it's. r-3,,
".0 -5-
RECEIVED
JUL 2 21999
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CT ell
CITY OF EDMONDS
Ile"
VID
. .. .... . .. ....
1.-41
10
+
Nu t
'oo,
11L
ig
4 se
0 ry
10 4p
94—
x
A
0
N
\7\
ZY-ALE", 1"=
bA*.r.V Yk
N., Ljj> -a. 1 -7
ple,
owlv -
% ' 1�4q cc Col" (s o I A su. � cgs i I C
H61 0 A L CS
14"
6=q3, q�5
9- s-r (cmetr 1600) D= 10 0- � 6iq
bed� 7-7 NC ab 00) 3q 7.q:� 4% q 7 -A V�, 6RADig
txllw
ec 4 0 0
I 9,q, 4 q MAXI MR M
q 9 At rilvAt,
14
ti I (.A41 T"
REA: 15, r7 00 S+C.
134.39
............
68
rA. LA _A�
..........
. . ............ \- .., ...
126.24
........ 41
... ........
.................
....... ................. .............. .. .......... .
. . . ..... ..
. ....... . .. . . .. 7
X. ..... ........
...... 119.81
. . . . .... ............
........... ... 7.&
..................... .... ....
. ...... 118.78
................ ..
......... ... .... 85
7.
"'+'I i4.57
........ ... .......
.............. ...... . ........
.. .. ...........
;__`1 .... ........ ...... .. .
........... ... ....
...... .. ... . ..
. ........ ..
... .......... . .... .......
... . .... 10
120
4 _108:
12 (X 9S. `77
t
:e
IN
'77-
............ .................... ..... ........ ... .... ..
4cl
......... ..... . . .... ...
............ '106
...........
i ' 7,
103.52
;�03A
4(
-4- ;.f - + 101.18 + 10 W2.04
.1- ta&. kl*� 9.32 4f
!b
LJ I'V A�
4_
0.00
C14
94.10
.49
+ 3 -99.48
3.64
+ 93.22
APP V
5. 0+ 97156 PLANNING/
r:
'0 17
+ 92'.36 4
93.3 IGH
6
T
46 05'57'51 ".0
- *6 " ' '\ Ap- 916
R 602.96 ACCEPTAB
M ERIAL
OR 35 IRECEWED
62.76' S
9 A SoVi 40
2005
MAR
AN
87 PERN)ft COUNTER
m 1_7�0 F LE
�Tm vm m MaT 10 STR E L
. I
bx6�mpa4t- 696.09
I qqzo �OMEVIEWB(_
r 'APPROVED AS NOTED
k�� 0W6RS-.,Saot+L,,p�amA
BY ENGI EERIN
Ll
. �7_ I M ?a
Uffl 98 Q C6L.0, q
Date:
RS/DOWNSPOUITS
..EDMONDS TO CONNEC TO-EXLST. SYST.
BE
0llvNER/CONTRAC7:GnRiS RESPONSISLE LY PAR
EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE ROA