18505 79TH PL W.pdfZ
LIJ
0i
LU;
LLJ
_j
U) LL.
Uj
_j
LL
D) a
'j
Z
Z
Lu
L)
0
0
LU LLj
U_ 0
Z
Uj (n
U :F
15 �-.
Z
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 STH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
I . 7
HEARING EXAMINER
11: St. 189'
FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.:
LOCATION:
APPLICATION:
REVIEW PROCESS:
MAJOR ISSUES:
Tartan Development Co.
V 96-135
18505 79 Pl. W (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
A variance to reduce the required 25 foot street setback on the east
property line to 7.5 feet to allow for construction of a new single
family residence (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community, Development Code (ECDC)
Section 16.20.030 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Site
Development Standards).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20.85 (VARIANCES).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation:
Hearing Examiner Decision:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Approve with conditions
Approve with conditions
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The
hearing on the application was opened at 11:00 a.m. December 19, 1996, in the Plaza Room,
Edmonds Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 11: 15 a.m. Participants at the public
hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the
hearing is available in the Planning Division.
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
-2n _690,ZW4
N"','Nm �555'g 7:'
Z
Z
uo�
01
(n
U)
LU
_5
U) U-1
0
T) a
U,
Z
O�
UJ Lu�
LA
0
X C.)
I-- —
U- 8
Z
LU (n
0
Z
0
to
HEARING COMMENTS:
The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Stephen F. Bullock, Project Planner, presented the staff report which recommended
approval with conditions. He noted that the property is triangular in shape and has an
existing right-of-way adjacent which requires a 25 foot setback. He indicated that this
right-of-way will never be used as a public street.
From the Applicant:
Pat McDonald indicated that due to the shape of the property and the setback
requirements, that without a variance the lot is essentially unbuildable.
John Gamlam, representing the seller of the property (Gary & Susie DeRosa), ndicated
he had talked to neighbors and that they were generally favorable. The intent is to build a
home comparable to the neighborhood.
From the Community:
No one testified and no letters from surrounding property owners were received.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
1) Size: The subject property is approximately 6,400 square feet in area,
and is irregular in shape with 120-feet of frontage along 79th Place W.
to the south and 105-feet of frontage along the undeveloped right-of-
way to the east (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
2) Land Use: The subject property is currently undeveloped.
3) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Residential Single -
Family - 8,000 sq. ft. lots (RS-8) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
Single -Family homes are a permitted primary use in this zone.
t
4) Terrain and Vegetation: The subject property is generally fla to
rolling and vegetated with lawn.
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a. Fact: The adjacent properties on all sides are cur ' rently zoned under, the,
same RS-8 zone (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1). These properties are also
developedwith single-family homes.
WM�
Hearing Examiner Decision
'J,
Case No. V 96-135
Page 3
B. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE
Z
1. Critical Areas Compliance
UJf
cc 2f
a. Facts:
1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.153
ri 0�
Qj
uj�
(Critical Areas Ordinance).
LU
2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist, and the city has
U.
issued a Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Critical Areas
0,
Study.
LL <
b. Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of the
In 0
City's Critical Areas Ordinance.
Lu!
Z t
3. Compliance with RS-8 Zoning Standards
Z
UJ LW
a. Facts:
1) The fundamental site development standards pertaining to Residential
tun) �1
0—
development in the RS-8 zone are set forth in Chapter 16.20.030.
a �_ I
These include the following for locating structures:
LU it
a) Street Setback: 25 feet
U.
Z11
b) Rear Setback: 15 feet (5 feet for detached structures < 600 sq.,
LU tn;�
c) Side Setbacks: 7.5 feet
0
Z
d) Maximum Height: 25 feet
e) Lot Coverage: 35%
2) Because of the existing streets to the north and south of this lot, the
required setbacks are as follows:
a) Street Setback: South and East property lines
b) Rear Setback: None
c) Side Setbacks: Northwest property line
4. Compliance with requirement for a Variance
0
ECDC Chapter 20.15B. 180.A, states an applicant may request a variance from
the standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC
Chapter 20.8S (Variances). Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth L the
mechanism whereby a provision of the Code may be varied on a case -by -case
basis if the application of the provision would result in an unusual and
unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A, Attachments 3).
t
a. Facts:
1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which
a variance request must comply in order to be granted by the Hearing
Examiner. These criteria include: a Special Circumstance must exist;
no Special Privilege is granted; the proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan; the proposal is consistent with the Zoning Code.-L
7,71,
0!
place, the lot is not large enough to put a house on (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 3).
• Special Privilege - This is not a special privilege in that other
property owners with the circumstances would have the same
opportunity to meet the variance criteria.
• Comprehensive Plan - The proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan in that it does not create a greater density or
change the residential character of the neighborhood.
• Zoning Ordinance - The proposal is consistent with the Zoning
Ordinance in that it does not create a greater density or ask for any
increase in lot coverage or additional height.
• Not Detrimental - The granting of this variance does not appear to
be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious
to adjacent properties or improvements in the vicinity and with the
same zone.
Minimum Variance - The granting of this variance appears to be
the minimum necessary to grant the applicants the rights enjoyed
by the other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning and
allow for the reasonable.
b. Conclusions:
1) City staff agrees that Special Circumstances exist in regards to this
lot's size, shape, and location adjacent to two separate right-of-ways.
The pie shape of the lot with streets on two of the three side and the
associated street setbacks seriously reduces the buildable area of the lot
to a size and shape that a house can not be built on (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 3).
2) No special privilege will be demonstrated in granting this variance in
that other variances have been granted in situations like these (see
t 0 Exhibit A, Attachment 3).
3) Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued
development of the site in a manner consisten t with the intent of the
Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan designation of the site.
4) Approval of a setback variance on the east side of the lot will not be
detrimental to adjacent property owners in that the property impacted
71
Hearing Exammer Decision
Case No. V 96-135
Page 5
is the right-of-way to the east. Also, since the eastern right-of-way will
never, be developed as a street because of its reduced size a street
setback will never an issue for neighborhood continuity.
5) Approval of the requested variance appears to be the minimum
required to allow for construction of a reasonable new single family
home (see Exhibit A, Attachment 3).
6) As conditioned, the requested variance would be consistent with these
review criteria.
.C. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
1. Review by City Departments
a. Fact: No comments were made by other City departments.
b. Conclusion: Other City departments have no initial concerns.
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC)
1 . Comprehensive Plan Designation
a. Fact: The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as LOW
Density Residential.
b. Conclusion: The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density
Residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance is approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Reduce the east street setback 171h-feet as depicted in the submitted'site plan to provide a
7.5-foot setback from the east property line (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to any construction.
4. The permit should be transferable.
W
-0� -il�
W
�E' "YpAft
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 96-135
Page 6
Entered this 6th day of January, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
z
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
Z
LU
cc
0
cn
0 LU:
LU X:
- �J
i �-. (;�
(n LL( Robertb. Burke
LU 0.
Hearing Examiner Pro Tern
LL
Cn
LU
z
RECONSWERATIONS AND APPEALS
LU W�
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
U appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
0
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
A. REQUEST FOR RECONSMERATION
LL 0
Z;
cn: Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or
—1 recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
0 initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
z and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must
cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
13. "PEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
0 name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the Sime before the expiration date.'
0,
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
z
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
3: Z�
a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
LUI
cc Mi
mi
EXHIBIT:
0!
Lui
LU
The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record.
U) W
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
10
PARTIES oF RECORD:
LL
T
Pat McDonald Planning Division
M
Z
Tartan Development, Inc. Engineering Division
;7- pi
17812 105th Ave. SE Fire Department
Z
Uj Lui
Snohomish, WA 98290 Parks Department
C31
Public Works Department
Gary & Susie DeRosa John Gamlani
17222 Greenwood Pl. N. 127 Skyline Drive
Z.
Shoreline, WA 98133 Edmonds, WA. 98020
U
z
0
0
XW
M
IN "I ib
N
T, g
Oil
'EXHIBITSLIST
FILE NO. CU-96-135
(Submitted as of December 19, 1996)
z
Uj;
A.
Platming'Division Staff Advisory Report
-j
B.
LUj
Ui M)
C.
Ln u-
0
D.
LL
E.
(n
LU!
F.,
z
G.
Uj LU
n
H.
Lwn
0-
L
L
Uwj
z
K.
uj rn
L.
17
z
M.
N.
0.
P.
0
R.
S.
T.
I U.
CM-(#)EX/(DATV,REP0KrS\STAFF
CITY OF EDMONDS
BARBARA FAHEY
250 STH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (208) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221
OMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
meow
c
Public Works Planning Parks and Recreation Engineering.
Letter of TranslmitW
Date.
-December 13,1996
To:
Tartan Development, Inc.
17812 105th Ave. SE
Snohomish, WA 98290
Subject:
V-96-135
Transmitting
Agenda & Staff Report
For Your Inforrnation: XX
As you requested:
For your file:
Corn ment:
Note attachments:
Sincerely,
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Secretary
cc: Gary & Susie DeRosa
Incorporated August 11, 1890,0
Sister Cities International — Hel�i,nanl Japan
<
U
�u
LL
<
D
0
T-
Z
—0
Z �-
-u L�
'.0 L�L
7 L
c
2
H
b
Z
c
qu
of
anqwl
zoned, RS-4
-k0
X
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
Z
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT
Cr.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
-J LY
0i
0
To: Ron McConnell, Hearing Examiner
Lul
LU X!
-J �-11
U) LL
LU C>i
From: CDAL, —::R
Stephen ftBulfockf--
9 .J
Project Planner
T a
Date: DECEMBER 13,1996
X
Z
File: V-96-135
Z
Hearing Date, Time, And Place: December 19,1996, At 9:00 AM,
LU w;
Plaza Meeting Room, Edmonds Public Library
650 Main St.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LL
Z11
Section Fa—ge
UJ Ca
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2
A. APPLICATION ........................................................................... .................................................................... 2
ZB.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL ......................................................................................................................... 2
C. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 2
H. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................... 3
A. SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3
B. EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) COMPLIANCE ........................................................ 3
C. TECHNICAL COMMITTEE .............................................................................................................................. 5
D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC) .............................................................................................................. 5
111. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS .......................................................................... 5
0
A. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION ............................................................................................................... 5
B. APPEALS ............................... ................................................................................................................. 5
IV. LAPSE OF APPROVAL ...................................................................................................... 5
V. NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR ............................................................................ 5
VI. APPENDICES ............................................................................ L 6
o ........ o ............ .......................
VIL PARTIES OF RECORD 6
......... .............. o ........................ o ............ o ....... o ......................
V96_135.DOC /December 13,1996 i StaffReport
4�
0
Z
n
UO
U)
U)
LU
-J
U) U.
10
2 �
9 -J
U.
LA C I
X UJ
I-- X
Z t—
;-- 0
Z I--
UJ UJ
0—
LJ- C
2
LU y
0
Z
1. INTRODUCTION
A. Application
1. Applicant: Tartan Development Co. (see Attachment 2).
2. Site Location: 18505 79PI. W (see Attachment 1).
3. Request: A variance to reduce the required 25 foot street setback on the east property line
to 7.5 feet to allow for construction of a new single family residence (see Attachment 2).
4. Review Process Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes final
decision.
5. Maior Issues:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 16.20.030
(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Site Development Standards).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.85
(VARIANCES).
B. Description of Proposal
As inuicateG Dy figure 1, the
subject property is pie
shaped with two of the three
sides adjacent to a public
right-of-way. However, the
right-of-way to the east of the
property is undersized and
undeveloped, but because it
is a pubic right-of-way a 25-
foot street setback is
required. The applicant
submits that providing 25-
foot street setbacks from two
of the three property lines on this property creates a hardship from which they request the
following variance. Reducing the required setback from 25-feet to 7.5-feet (a typical side setback)
the applicant states, would resolve their problem (see figure 2). For more detail see the attached
vicinity map, attachment 1, and site plan, attachment 4.
C. Recommendations
Based on statements of Fact, Conclusions, and Attachments in this report we recommend approval
of this application subject to the following conditions:
I Reduce the east street setback 171/2-feet as depicted in the submitted site plan to provide a 7.5-
foot setback from the east property line (see Attachment 4).
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure compliance
with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The applicant must obtain a building permit prior to any construction.
4. The permit should be transferable.
V91�_135.DOC /December 13,1996/ Staff Report
Z
I— LUI
UO
in
LU
J
0) U.
LU 0
LL
Cl)
ul
Z
�p
UJ W
0—
a i-
UJ LU
ul ft,
U:F
�- I-
0
Z
Tartan Development Inc.
File No. V-96-135
Page 3 of 6
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Site Description
1. Site Development And Zoning:
a) Facts:
(1) aj:ze- The subject property is approximately 6,400 square feet in area, and is
irregular in shape with 120-feet of frontage along 79th Place W. to the south and
105-feet of frontage along the undeveloped right-of-way to the east (see Attachment
4).
(2) Land Use: The subject property is currently undeveloped.
(3) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Residential Single -Family - 8,000 sq.
ft. lots (RS-8) (see Attachment 1). Single -Family homes are a permitted primary use
in this zone.
(4) Terrain and Vegetation The subject property is generally flat to rolling and
vegetated with lawn.
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a) Eact. The adjacent properties on all sides are currently zoned under the same RS-8
zone (see Attachment 1). These properties are also developed with single-family homes.
B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance
1. Critical Areas Compliance
a) Facts:
(1) This proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.15 1 B (Critical . Areas
Ordinance).
(2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist,, and. the city has issued a
Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Critical Areas Study.
b) Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of the.City's Critical
Areas Ordinance.
2. Compliance with RS-8 Zoning Standards
a) Facts:
(1) The fundamental site development standards pertaining to Residential development
in the RS-8 zone are set forth in Chapter 16.20.030.. These include the following for
locating structures:
a) Street Setback: 25 feet
b) Rear Setback: 15 feet (5 feet for detached structures < 600 sq. ft.)
c) Side Setbacks: 7.5 feet
d) Maximum Height: 25 feet
e) Lot Coverage: 35%
(2) Because of the existing streets to the north and southof this lot, the required setbacks
are as follows:
a) Street Setback: South and East property, lines
b) Rear Setback: None
c) Side Setbacks: Northwest property line
V96J35.D0C /December, 13i 1996/ Staff Report,
Y
Tartan Development Inc.
GO
File No. V-96-135
Page 4 of 6
3. Compliance with requirement for a Variance
ECDC Chapter 20.15B.180.A, states an applicant may request a variance from the standards
of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85 (Variances).
Z
Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of the Code may be
varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the provision would result in an unusual
and unreasonable hardship (see Attachments 3).
cc
5;
a) Facts:
0!
(1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a variance
request must comply in order to be granted by the Hearing Examiner. These criteria
LU;
ILI
include: a Special Circumstance must exist; no Special Privilege is granted; the
_3
0) LL
proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; the proposal is consistent with
—0
UJ
the Zoning Code.
(2) The applicant has submitted declarations with their submittal which address the
U.
decisional criteria as follows (see Attachment 3):
sea
Special Circumstances - The irregular shape of the subject property along with
UWJ;,
the street setback requirement from 2 of the 3 property lines. reduces the
Z
buildable area to a size and shape that creates a definite hardship for the
0i
applicant. With the current setbacks in place, the lot is not large enough to put a
ED- Lul
house on (see Attachment 3).
g!
n 0i
0 Special Privilege - This is not a special privilege in that other property owners
with the circumstances would have the same opportunity to meet the variance
criteria,
LU
Comprehensive Plan - The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
LL 0
in that it does not create a greater density or change the residential character of
M
the neighborhood.
U
Zoning Ordinance - The proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance in that
0
it does not create a greater density or ask for any increase in lot coverage or
Z
additional height.
• Not Detrimental - The granting of this variance does not appear to be detrimental
to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to adjacent properties or
improvements in the vicinity and with the same zone.
• Minimum Variance - The granting of this variance appears to be the minimum
necessary to grant the applicants the rights enjoyed by the other properties in the
vicinity with the same zoning and allow for the reasonable .
b)
01
to
Conclusions:
(1) City staff agrees that Special Circumstances exist in regards to this lot's size, shape,
and location adjacent to two separate right-of-ways. The pie shape of the lot with
streets on two of the three side and the associated street setbacks seriously reduces
the buildable area of the lot to a size and shape that a house can not be built on (see
Attachment 3).
(2) No special privilege will be demonstrated in granting. this variance in that other
variances have been granted in situations like these (see Attachment 3).
(3) Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the continued development of the
site in a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive
Plan designation of the site.
(4) Approval of a setback variance on the east side of the lot will not be detrimental to.
adjacent property owners in that the property impacted is the right-df-w.ay to the east.
V96-135.DOC December 13,1996 Staff Report
f
0
Tartan Development Inc.
File No. V-96-135
Page 5 of 6
Also, since the eastern right-of-way will never be developed as a street because of its
reduced size a street setback will never an issue for neighborhood continuity.
(5) Approval of the requested variance appears to be the minimum required to allow for
construction of a reasonable new single family home (see Attachment 3).
(6) As conditioned, the requested variance would be consistent with these review criteria.
C. Technical Committee
1. Review by City Departments
a) Fact: No comments were made by other City departments.
b) Conclusion: Other City departments have no initial concerns.
D. Comprehensive Plan (ECDC)
1. Comprehensive Plan Designation
a) Fact: The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density
Residential.
b) Conclusion: The proposed project is consistent with the Low Density Residential
designation in the Comprehensive Plan.
III. RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any
person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should contact the Planning Department
for further procedural information.
IV.
V.
A. Request for Reconsideration
Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initial
decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or
presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land which is the
subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must cite specific
references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing the type of
application being reviewed.
B. Appeals
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name
of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the
appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community
Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed,
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required,
substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use
permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time
before the expiration date.'
NOTICE TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR
V96-135.DOC /December 13,1996 /Staff Report
01:
...........
z
cr
0) UJ
uj
U) LL
ui 0
LL
UJ
z
z
uj uj
cn
0—
a
UJ LL
U-
2
uj (f,
NOTICE- IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN
THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT._
z
Z
LU
Cr
<:D
LU L)
0
LU
LU
-J
La ou-
LU
LL. <
Ln
LU
3:
z I--
;-- 0
Z I--
UJ U.1
U (J)
0
C3
W UJ
3: L)
0
z
L . U (n
z
0
M
L 0
city of ek"�nonds
land use application
Q ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 130ARD
U COMP PLAN AMENDMENT
C1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Q HOME OCCUPATION
0 FORMAL SUBDIVISION
E3 SHORT SUBDIVISION
(3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Q PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
IZI OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT
STREET VACATION
13 REZONE
Q SHORELINE PERMIT
0 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE
EXCEPTION
Q OTHER
FILE# V-f-l�-136 ZONE or -
DATE 1� - LK REC'D BY
FEE 0*4(11. RECEIPT# 04f 3
HEARING DATE
ZHE L3 STAFF 0 PB Q ADB 13 CC
ACTION TAKEN:
Applicant TAFT�A/ -D4ve10,2,MenJrA)C- Phone /-/g/ .24/ 2 7
Address 1-71212 105'1' AVe sF- 5-noAom,'s A WA jw�Z-90
Property Address or Location -77+Vi PL Lo
Property Owner Gki- 4 t SuVe 1--)e- A s'd Phone .2 /9* 7
Address /72;?,2 6.-ewwoodlfl Ay 5:AoneL,,- 4,,1,4 q.-13-3
Agent 72�i A4 C Phone 41?1 a 4
ill? 7
Address 4 �le- 9 h I., �9,; z q-0
TaxAcc# V7100 000 /7000Y —Sec�'Z�j_Twp.0Z7A/ Rng. qf
Legal Description /,n/- /7 14101019AI r
,IeAl
Details of Project or Proposed Use --z -d�-sq TcIT&Ic
The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its he ' irs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the
application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all
damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon
false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished 'by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or
employees.
The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to
enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT Atta hm!ent 2
a
W
Z
UO
(n a
LU
W 0
La
Z
U)
0
a
W
U- C
2
UJ 0,
U 5
81-
Z
0
. 1 4
Debfcateb to Quaffty,
Commftteb to Castomen Satfog:aCtfon
VARIANCE FOR LOT 17 OF HIDDEN GLEN:
CHANGING BUILDING SET BACK FROM 15'TO 7.5'
This proposal meets the special circumstance criteria because of lot size and
setback requirements. This proposal is not a grant of special privilege, Adjusting lot
setbacks is something commonly done on difficult lots, with roads on two of three side
of the lot. The approval of this variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
This lot is in a single family development, and is consistent with the
comprehensive plan for that area. It is also consistent with the zoning ordinance for th
area, which is RS 8.
We are seeking to change the setback from 15ft to 7.5ft on the east property
line. There is a gravel road on that same side, that is the access for one house. This
apparently is the reason for the 15 foot setback. We are asking that this lot line be
treated as a typical side lot line, matching the 7.5 foot setback that is in place on the
other side lot line of this property.
The has no impact on the property value of adjacent homes. T ' he access road
acts as an alley between lot 17 and lot 18. Changing this lot line setback will not resuli
in these houses being too close together, nor will our project be harmful to any person
on or around this lot.
With the existing set backs in place, the lot isn't large enough to put a house on.
We are proposing a multilevel home that will maximize the space available on this lot,
but are still unable to meet the current requirements.
s
It
J
Attachment3
4�g
i" 4
i-E P LP% N LOT 17 HI.DtE,.m GLEN
000.'',17660 4/
TA X 7/06
Uji
cc
i5
_j ol
LUI
uj
U.
LO se+bh,k ne,
3: UA
I- X,
Z �-j
oi
ui Lul
L) U)
s etkck
LU LU
.79P
ui 7Z'
Pro osej
28
Flig
760
17
j
3
en
re
T
I
z
Z.0
x
0
z
0
Notice of Development Application & Public Hearing
Date of Notice: December 5, 1996
File #V-96-135
Applicant Information
Name ol'Applicant: ............
Tartan Development, Inc.
Date olApplication: ..
:) November 8, 1996
Date Application Counplete:
December4,1996
Project Locatio-, .............
18505 79th Place West
Projert Description:....
Variance to red ce the required street
setback from the east property line from
25-feet to 7.5-feet to allow for the
construction of a new single�famfly
resickoce.
Public Comments due by:..
December 19,1996
City Contact for project:
Steve Bullock
Public Hearin
December 19,1996
Pate: Time: 9:00 AM.
Permit Information
Requested Permits
* Variance
and Approvals: .
Other Required Permits
0 Building
not yet applied for (if
known): .............. ---
Required Studies related
� Unknown
to the project:....... . .........
Related Environmental
Z Critical Areas Checklist
Documents: ....................
g Information, -
Place: Plaza meeting Room - 650 Main St., Edmonds
information on this development application can be viewed or obtained at the City of Edmonds Community Services Department,
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020. (206) 771-0220. Public comments should also be seat to this address.
The decision - this nevelopment"Ppliestim, will heamde within 120 da)w ofthe date oftheLefter ofComplehmess, with allowances, madeforstudW and
additional information reptests. Note that abflh�v to appeal a decision hFccolingent upon participation in the jeermil decision twoosse
u The remove, mutilation, destruction, or concealment athl. This notice may be removed
Warning! otlee before the hearing date is a misdemeanor punishable by after: December19,1996
- fine and imprisonment.
0
I'M
Off"
_""�'77777M
471000000500008
47100000030000
47100000040009
GUY J. SPELLMAN
JAMES V; MONICA TURNER
JAMES R. LORENT
18512 79th PL. W.
18516 79th PL. W
�18514 79th-PL. W
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
me
uil
47100000110000
47100000700606
�47100000100001
a:
RICHARD F; TINA O'NEILL
-18414
JOHN N; PATRIC LAWRENCE
GLENN M. ROBERTS
79th Pt. W.
EDMONDS,
18432 79th PL. W
�18416 79th PL. W
01
WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
(n
E2 uil
_j
LL
47100000140007
47100000120009
47100000120008
.0
JOHN HEUERMAN
NORMAN BARRINGER
ROBERT D..JOSS
18419 79th PL. W.
18405 79th ft.� W
18415 79th PL. W
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
u-
U,
47100000260003
47100000150006
47100000150005
Z 1.-:
ERNEST; MARY FOSTER
WILLIAM E. OAKES�
LYN HOWERTON JR.
Oi
18521 79th PL. W.
18427 79th PL. W
18501 79th PL. W
53 W�
2 Di
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
434'600olO80105
43460001070205
43460001080006
L w Lu
U Lu
AL LYON; SUSAN
GARTM; LINDA R, JOHNSON
DANIEL M; CAREEN A SNOW
7939 186th ST. SW
7805 186th ST. SW
792� 186th ST. SW
u-
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA- 98026
EDMONDS, W� 98026
Lu
0
47100000190002
4710OObOO20001
47100000180003
STEVEN P; KATHY SLATER PATRICK SIEBEL
LE THORNHILL
7817 185th PL SW
7915 186th ST. SW
7831 185th PL. SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
47100000230006
47100000210008
47100000220007
DOUGLAS M. JERE RESNICK
7802 185th PL. SW
FRANK HJ GEBEL
LOIS H. ROWE
7801 185th PL. SW.,
7800 185th PL. SW',
EDMONDS, WA. 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
.0
47100000240005
47100000250004,
TARTAN DEVELOPMENT
17812 105th AVE. SE
ROBERT C; CAROL EATON,
BRUCE'FERRISIANDERSON
SNOHOMISH, WA '
98290
7810 185th PL. SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
7818 185th PL. SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
to
GARY & SUSIE DEROSA
17222 GREENWOOD PL. N
SHORELINE, WA 98133
77 777.
7:777r7'7777 777-;�;:'
71, M
Veij
cj 0
U) a
U) LU
ui
LL
L —0
u
u-
tu
�-:r
z I--
�p
LU w
m
0—
a �-
W LL
Lu
0
z
13
M.,
z
UO
U) 0
(j) LAJ
ED
-i
U) LL
L -0
uj
z
0
W LU
U
0
W LAJ
cf,
0
z
.- 4 V
zi.j
X Z
�- Lul�
cr
(jo
U) aj
in LLJ!
uj
U.
0
ul
2 �
62 -J
U.
:F Lu!
I-- X;,
Z f-;
;7- 01
Z �-i
Lu uji
en
u-
z
Lli U)!
z
01
T F, iEnmc>r.;r>s
IP
W....
la^na^MA PARRY
w"Momov. WA 00000 - ulowl "I-Oaxo . m^3e4xc;w 771:02*1 M^V!:,n
a.
PubUa Works 0 Pler"ne Park= --I Pt-Qv0QMon!-KnQln"nn0
lmLjm=c3lpll3n 00van PA43F-
,rczl-.
c%A t3L-4?
NummeR c10 mAimes; ---N
(Incluctirwo Ckwwor PmSpm)
Fiecap4mrsts -rw000ptar mumben.
-3 ft - -ac�e4 FACSIMIA = 10QUIPMENT.
it therm. are any problem.% -
ckulng; teansminalon c�r
r I I . ,, r,
ctocuments ans reciftived
.
and ask
Senclarle -relacm:pplar Numtimr: (2pG) 771-0221
R G, PIX-e-AA
THIS DOCUMENT
WAS SENT
** COUNT
# 3
*** SEND ***
(REDUCED SAMPLE ABOVE)
NO
REMOTE STATION I.D.
START TIME
DURATION
#P�
COMMENT
11
12063393049
1 12— 2-96 10:04PM
1-39"
3
1
THIS IS A LEGAL ADVEiRTISEMENT AND SHOULD BE BILLED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
z if
Name of Applicant:
UJ,
File No.:
cc 2:
Project Location:
_J 01
Project Description:
UJI
LU
LL
UJ
City Contact:'
2
Public Comment Period Due By:
g tj I
LL
Name of Applicant:
UJ;
X:
File No.:
Z 1.-.
Pro ect Location:
0:
Project Description:
LU Uk.
'S D;
5
City Contact:
Public Comment Period Due By:
W �U_
X
Name of Applicant:
U.
File No.:
Z
Project Location:
Project Description:
0
z
City Contact:
Public Comment Period Due By:
Name of Applicant:
File No.:
Project Location:
Project Description:
City Contact:
0 Public Comment Period Due By:
Name of Applicant:
File No.:
Project Location:
Project Description:
City Contact:
Public Comment Period Due By:
PUBLIC HEARING and
NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
William F, Morton
CUH-96-126
1030"A"Avenue
Conditional Use Permit for a home occupation permit to operate a "Bed & Breakfast"
and conduct on -site weddings. The weddings would accommodate approximately 35
people, with approx. 8 weddings per year. All the proposed activities would be
conducted within an existing single-family residence.
Kirk Vinish
12/19/96
Robert Cole & Jeri Merritt
V-96-130
16006 75th Place West
Variance to increase the maximum permitted height in the RS-12 zone by from 25-feet
to 33-feet to allow the construction of a new single-family residence.
Kirk Vinish
12119/96
Walter Pisco
V-96-139
15772 75th Place West
Variance to increase the maximum permitted height from 25-feet to 33-feet for an
existing single-family residence, to allow the installation of a new roof.
Kirk Vinish
12119/96
Tartan Development, Inc.
V-96-135
18505 79th Place West
Variance to reduce the required street setback from the east property line from 25-feet
to 7.5-feet to allow for the construction of a new single-family residence.
Steve Bullock
12/19/96
Ronald and Calysta Peterson
V-96-136
9824 Cherry Street
Variance to reduce the required street setback from the 4planned-line right-of-way"
adjacent to the subject property's north property line from 25-feet to 20-feet to allow the
construction of a second story addition above the garage of an existing single-family
residence,
Meg Gruwell
12/19/96
Z
< J-:
= Z
F- UJ
CC
LU
-j
C-) 0
0) a
C/) LU
U.1 x
-i F-
Ln LL
0
LU
LL
D)
x LU
F- :E
Z F-
0
LU Uj
U
LU Lul
= U
F- F-
U- 0
z
LU
0
z
O'l
N
APPLIPATION ROUTING FORM FILE: V-964 35
AND CHECKLIST FROM: PLANNING
ROUTED TO: RETURNED
ENGINEERNG
AIJIPReeillig-
Engineering
Fire -A 1/13/96
Public Works--H/ 13/96
Public Works A W&A.
ParksexRec. 11/13/96
Parks ex Rec.
Staff Comments:- &e aAf AV-P"V
*PER WHAT. SECTION OF THE CODE?
*COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS, WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED
*Additional Information Required for Complete Application
*Additional Studies Required to Complete Review
• Owne -GARY ex
• Property Address 18505 Z9TH PL. W.
• Date of Application 11/8/96
a Typ
± Hearing Requ1red:Yes-)L— No—
Date of, Hearing (if known)
---�—�Site
Plan for Short Subdivision (8.5 x 11)
X Jee
X Site Plan (I I x 17)
X —APO List -��Legals
(Existing & Proposed)
Title Revort
Assessment
_Vicinity Map -----�—Proof
of 2-Year Occupancy (ADU)
Elevations
PeclarationsWariance&, C.� U'P.)
Petition (Official Street Map)
.Environmental Checklist
Critical Areas Determination
N
no *
/-7N
MEMORANDUM
I
NOV 1 1996
Date: N ovember 18,1996
PLANIiiiiii 0,5pr.
To: Planning Division
From: Gordy Hyde, Engineering Coordinator
4M
Subject: Variance for Derosa (18505 - 79th Pl.
W.)(V-96-135)
The application has been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The
Engineering Division has no requirements to impose at this time. The applicant
will need to comply with all the terms of any future permits. The application is
considered complete at this time.
"A
z
< J_:
= Z
F- LU
LU
_j
U 0
(n 0
(n LU
Uj
Ln
w
2
< —p
cc:
U_
cn D,
a
X LLJ
z
z
LU LU
0-
0
w LJJi
LL 0
z
LU (f)
y
F-
0
z
0]
t 0
APPLICATION,1ROUTING'I'
AN0'bN9r.KL19
31RM ,FILE: W96435
FROM: PLANNING:
I
ROUTED M:
RETUMED PARK '&
Engineering I 1 /13/96
Engineering
Flre________jjLj3L26
Fire
Publlc W 15
Public Works
Parks 8x Rec.
Staff Comments-
*PEk WHAT SECTION OF. THE CODEZ
M
*COM MEN TS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDER ED
..*Additional Information Required for Complete Application
*Additional StudiesRequired to Complete Review
Owner- GAR� 81 SUSIE DEROSA
Property Add
Date of Application 11/8/96
Type REDUCE SETBACKS
Hearing RequiredNes, X No—
Date of Hearing (if known)
X _Application _��Site
Plan for Short StitidlVision (8 '5X'11)
X
Plan (111 x 17)
X List —L_
_L_Legal I s (Exisfin g& P roposed)'
Title Report
__��nvjronrnwtal Assessment:,
Vicinity Map _LL__.�_Proof
of 2-Year Occupancy (APU)
—Elevations
..be'ciarations(V6riance C'
_Petition (Official Street Map)
.Environrn ental h k1l t�
Cl ec; s'
Critical Areas Determination
0
r
PLICATIONROUTING. FORM
RECEIVELO
FI
NO
11/13/96
Parks ex Rec
Staff Comments:
PERWHAT SECTION OF THE CODE?
*COMMENTS WITHOUT CITATIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED
*Additional Information Required for Complete Application
�*Addltional Studies Required to Complete Review
Property Address, 18505 79TH PL. W.
Date of Application 11/8/96
Type REDUCE SETBACKS
Hearing __q_______`_,,~~�___
_~^^~`^~a~°~sp^"°=°w^
um
1
Title Report-____Envlronmentall
Assessment/
VimmtyMap
__,__Proof of 2 ear Occupancy
Petition (Official Street Map)
__L�Environmentil Checklist.
Critical Areas Determination
0
0
z
Z
F- Uj
CC M
LU =)
U
0
U) 0
U) UJ
LU
-i
LL
0
LU
LL <
U,
F-
z
j.- 0
Z �-
LU LU
L) cn
0—
C3 �—
UJ LU
F-
�L- 0
z
L Li
F- F-.
0
z
T"
t 0
Z
LU,
cc
LU L)
-i
U 0
Cl)
(n
LU
-J
UJ 0:
LL
D
0 �
UJ
z F-
'i P
LU W
D,
0-
0 �-'
W
�L- 0
z
L)
0
z
0
t 0
El ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
13 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT SEIZE=
13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE# ZONE
E3 HOME OCCUPATION
13 FORMAL SUBDIVISION DATE REC'D BY.
L3 SHORT SUBDIVISION
C3 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEE -�W(11 RECEIPT# Z 7- 0 e-( 3
E3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT HEARING DATE
0 OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT /
STREET VACATION 2(HE Q STAFF Q PB 13 ADB Q CC
El REZONE
L3 SHORELINE PERMIT ACTION TAKEN:
3 VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE
EXCEPTION 13 APPROVED 0 DENIED El APPEALED
Q OTHER
APPEAL#
Applicant
_Ar r Ad Develoo n7ml zvc Phone ' 419'/ �? 41 477
Address 1-7 2 12 1051" AVe SE 5't)gAom"SA WA q? 2 10
Property Address or Location - &:t::� 1951DS -74T+ii PL Lo
Property Owner 6&- 5(45�,'e -/)f. A) S A Phone 5`19 - 2 / 9'7
Address / 7:2,2 2 6re e'v wvad/ P1 AJ LIA 177133
Agent 7PAj A4c 1-)oA,1,11d Phone 4/?/ a 411
77
Address /7?/,? z0's-t4,4Ve !nq'!�giw
TaxAcc#--q7/00 000 /70004/ /9 Twp.027A/ Rng. 41,E
Legal Description //)1(- /7 R, C(019 Al A-1
Details of Project or Proposed Use -Z A�-e & L%/( -7. S 71 se--� T,4c.IC
The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the
application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all
damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon
false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or
employees.
The undersigned applicant grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to
enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT -�R
.. .... .... .... .... . .. J
t
0
Z
-J
0
LU
LU
-J
Lo U0
UJ
LL
T)
LL,
Z F-
�- P
Z
UJ LU
0
a
LU LAJ
X U
F-
U-
UJ y.
U
0
Z
0
t 0
(1)
X
Dewcateb to qvau4,
COMMftteb tO CeWtoMen SatfefaCtfon
Tantan Hornes
(206) 491-2497 Pat McDonatb, Paeofbent
VARIANCE FOR LOT 17 OF HIDDEN GLEN:
CHANGING BUILDING SET BACK FROM I& TO 7.51
This proposal meets the special circumstance criteria because of lot size and
setback requirements. This proposal is not a grant of special privilege, Adjusting lot
setbacks is something commonly done on difficult lots, with roads on two of three sides
of the lot. The approval of this variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
This lot is in a single family development, and is consistent with the
comprehensive plan for that area. It is also consistent with the zoning ordinance for that
area, which is RS 8.
We are seeking to change the setback from 15ft to 7.5ft on the east property
line. There is a gravel road on that same side, that is the access for one house. This
apparently is the reason for the 15 foot setback. We are asking that this lot line be
treated as a typical side lot line, matching the 7.5 foot setback that is in place on the
other side lot line of this property.
The has no impact on the property value of adjacent homes. The access road
acts as an alley between lot 17 and lot 18. Changing this lot line setback will not result
in these houses being too close together, nor will our project be harmful to any person
on or around this lot.
With the existing set backs in place, the lot isn't large enough to put a house on.
We are proposing a multilevel home that will maximize the space available on this lot,
but are still unable to meet the current requirements.
LU
38
(.)0
U) 0
CD Uf
LU
i
Ln U-
LU 0
M
LLI
z
W LU
cr
0—
a L-
UJ U
L
2
w U
0
z
I L P� N
I D�jE
LOT P 11,
GL
TAIX 7 100,-b 0 0 176 0' q
i!tjfokce
s
ev
10
Elev 9p
IS
p roporS ej Ouse-
15. te
-Ae
viv
z
UJ
cr.
ju
UO
Q) a
LU
(n LL
0
U.
D
Ln a
z i__
m
L)
0-
0 �-
LU W
X lu
Lu
u
0
z
ol
6N THIS SIDE wrmN BOXL41
471000000500oo8
47100000030000
GUY J. SPELLMAN
JAMES V; MONICA TURNER.:
..-JAMES R. , LORENT
18512 79th PL. W.*
18516 79th PL. W
48�14 79t'h'-PL,. W
EDMONDS, WA 98026,
EDMONDS, WA 98026
;.EbMONDS., WA' 98626
47100000110000
47100000700006
RICHARD F; TINA OINEILL
JOHN N; PATRIC LAWRENCE
GLENN M. ROBERTS
-18414 79th PL. W.
18432 79th PL. W
18416 79th PL. W
EDMONDS,,WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
47100000140007
.47100000120009
4 1 7100000120008
JOHN HEUERMAN
NORMAN BARRINGER
ROBERT D. JOSS
18419 79th PL. W.
18405 79th PL. W
18415 79th PL. W
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS'i WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026,
47100900260003.
47100000150006,
47100000150005
ERNEST;MARY FOSTER
WILLIAM E. OAKES
�.LYN HOWERTON JR.
18521 79th PL. W.
18427 79th PL. W
18501.79th PL. W
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026�,
�EDMONDS, WA 98026
43460001080105
43460601 070205
43460001080006
AL LYON; SUSAN
GARY M; LINDA R. JOHNSON
DANIEL M; CARtEN.A SNOW
7939 186th ST. SW
7805 186th ST. SW
186th ST..SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA -"98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
47100000190002
47100000020001
STEVEN P; KATHY SLATER
PATRICK SIEBEL
.,47100000180003
LE THORNHILL
7817 185th PL SW
7915 186th ST.'SW.
7831,185th PL. SW
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
"EDMONDS, WA 98026
47100000230006
47100000210008 .47106000220007
DOUGLAS M. JERE RESNICK
FRANKHJ GEBEL
%:LOIS H. ROWE
7802 185th PL. SW
7801 185th PL. SW
�78 1 00,1 , 85th PL. SW
EDMONDS, WA. 98026
EDMONDS, WA 98026
EDMONDS. WA 98026
z
UA;
cr. mi
=)I
0!
Lu
-i
cn LL
0
_3
LL
T)
x uj
I--
z
of
Z
W LAJ w
LIJ
0-
0 �-. i
LU LU
�L- 01
z
0
ol
z