Loading...
18510 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDF11111111111111 14327 18510 OLYMPIC VIEW DR nr� oY1 ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER: v 6-0- 43 w U OD Q 0 I �40 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREAS : M-0 D 1 DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver �j(J Study Required ❑ Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: 1915 `000I 1 '501 a ! 1�J - G�031-5�s � � C� ��e �,�►�.��� DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: c SIDE SEWER PERMITS) #: �Q. GEOTECH REPORT DA' STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FO WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: OTHER: LID LOT: BLOCK: LATEMMSTsTomis\Street File Checklist.doc PLANNING DATA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STREET FILE Name: 13 / Date: (p 2 ZOO Site Address:I five/ �Y Plan Check #: .2-0O7 -061 Project Description: Reduced Site Plan Provid : (YES 0) Zoning: _' Z Map Page:��5q 1 Corner Lot: (YES / NO) Flag Lot: (YES 0) Critical Areas Determination #: 2007ao8-7 Study Required ❑ Waiver e h' o SEPA Determination: Exempt ❑ Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ❑ Fee ❑ Checklist ❑ APO List with notarized form Required Setbacks Street: / Side: o Side: / Rear: 2s i Actual Setbacks Street: / Side: 10.5 Side: ❑ Detached Structures: ❑ Rockeries: ❑ Fences/Trellises: ❑ Bay Windows/Projecting Modulation: ❑ Stairs Deck: Buildin Height Or . Datum Point: Datu n: _ Maximum Height Allowed: - ht: Other Parking Required: Parking Provided: li Lot Area: $y0 Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed: 3Y / Lot Coverage Calculations: SgK�'D ><� - 367 Flo -t 51D + 300 + ?W• - 1(v•S. ADU Created: (YE NO) dt orti Xek. %h �` Subdivision: 5 w4e,4 Im F--C G'518 ,0& Sw11 non -fcn/r ,it /of-c Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES NO) Lv7 Comments hp � � ODy3��ooZo ,�lol �' Ooy3���o�oSo� /*1 77 Plan Review By: 61 Planning Data Form 04-11-06.doc AS NOTED ��C� (7 INE DO 646 /Afb WMI � , 16 1, o o 1 - �o r 0-7 o I �I_g / y�o1 ►=X5 w rn. 5a,IvT=w �Y CXDEGK _ U y 1 o Z. I of-� M �,�i� • Hogs �=- � -� � � a /� �o U1 1 � O Hey 1o . OC 'Itia EXST6 VJ/ LK CO" v! S G oo� 1101 4 G\ �FAbi � "=:t: r3��Loc/16o� a o o�.�.� 0 bO mac.. o �... pp Q. CIO O N t�Qo a� ^.9 �P ��ko O- •M 4 *g is --o Sides z� owop `t Rear Other C R uired 2G7f' . — Aeorio.J TkQvie -4-C.,a.bEe IV Q - SaVL%I+ar� Scoer Cleo.Aolff LJ I Out APPROVED By ING o evr Qi] a '. /1%G 111= zo G LO-T— FLA" Far- E KA S K U 7—T- ISSVO 0L_Yh�P1G�/IrVJ DF-, F D K.o Q I--, Z0 SAX-` 00434 Do za 14 0 1 RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2007 STfR`EET FILE BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS �W 7- 0-6-114 PLAN #2007-0614 Ken and Gracelyn Skutt 18510 Olympic View Dr Edmonds FENCE DETAIL ATTACHMENT , +,o -tf-axW--Rs+ L.oc�ic,e CAioA�,�J 091C f + Section lProposed tobemodified ucl -fencing6feethi&wiffilmfl=2 inch finings (SW side) T D s NOTED ly\ c L. AP S S e o. I Y E flN E E FR I -�- \D C) 0�� V�.o APPROVED BY PLANNI G STREET FILE RESUB AUG 3 12007 ",-WvMRoTtwqT Section 4: Egigfin cedar board fence 4 feet high built on W of a 2 to 3 foot high rockery LNW side) 1,14 K-Ao" V- a o � c,,,,L, CJCLI- �,-, e'f IA C e- 0 C, 00 C-0 L"C"re-+c that are inaccessible to M children under 5. Gates will be constructed of the same material as the adjacent fencing i.e. Lattice gates in the lattice fence sections and a lattice Mel ggg m the board lattice Mel sections. AUG 3 12007 v 0 loq 1-01" \\O '5J k �rZ-7 P4rnl W PXL- �cE We& s1f& PW RESUB AUG 3 12007 ""WIaWMACFM )W&ENT .yf.. ti 11 #P20 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No:. L `l Q02-7 Site Information (soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation) 1. Site Address/Location 2. Property Tax Account Number: 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or squ a feet): 9 5 0 4. Is this site currently developed? yes; no. If yes; how is. site developed?. �S v 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site .of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water:— ; Approx. Depth: 7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: V ; Approx. Depth: What season(s) of the year? — 8. Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where waters across the grounds surface?. Flows are year-round? Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? ). 10. Site is primarily: forested ; meadow ; shrubs • mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: 1. Plan Check 2. Site is Zonec 3. SCS mappec 4. 5. For City Staff Use Only Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? do DETERMINATION STUDY ®Msa WAIVER ti -V. 167 City_ of Edmonds Development Services Department Planning Division Phone: 425.771.0220 Fax: 425.771.0221 The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist .should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #:_C'�ft -,PDO-7 - Cp$T: Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist,. sign and date it, and submit it . to the City. The City will review the checklist,.make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described on this forma In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, 'in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City.of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or. incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and convect to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting dant to this icatio . SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE � � ZPLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Own r/Applicant• Name Applicant Representative: Name i S ICE ULYM?Jc1 Street Address Street Address D20 City State Zip City State Zip Telephone: Z- -6 73 -0_3 6 Telephone: Email address (optional): C7 race 14 PVerlZo� ,d,P'pEmail Address (optional): CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location: 18510 Olympic View Drive Tax Acct. Number: 434600201401 and 434600300801 Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2007-0087 Applicant: Ken Skutt Owner: Ken Skutt CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site contains and/or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. • Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). • Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. • General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: • Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater. • Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. • Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. 0 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. • For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. • In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. • Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090. D. • Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact a Planner for more information. EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information. NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 wl Z r > t2lo z o o z M 0 z C, 0 z 0 ►: z 0 5 Ws. 0 ft m 0 3 CL to M 4 t7l 0 TL CITY OF EDMONDS _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPAROT FOR INSPECTION CALL • Permit i`0 __o (iU SIDE SEWER PERMIT 775-2525 Ext. 220 Issue Date k PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE *_ 1. Address of Construction / �/U ���*��©iC �J �1 AJV16 2. Property Legal Description (include all easements) 3. Single Family Residence A Multi -Family No. of Units Commercial 4. Owner and/or Builder 72 o TWvzop, 5. Contractor & License No.95' J0#AJSat1 -PUs�5 JP <S;7"7 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No A Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial.Dig (342-5344) before excavation). H 7. Cross other private property: Yes No X Easement required - attach legal description and county easement number. H w READ THE FOL.LOWT,.NG AND SIGN.: a 4 a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on >4 their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to °� construct side sewers in the public right-of-way. w b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for each Ei installation for one year. wC. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") z side sewer line. u d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. M e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.150) o and maximum grade of 100% (450). o H f. No turn in side sewer greater than 45 (1/8.bend) is°allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. r--� 1. Inspection during normal working` hours bn1y..___ Two (2) working days notice required. I _ DATE: 9 y �v �---� I certify that I have read and shall comply with the above H+ PERMIT FEE: DISAPPROVED By: Date: By: Date: p CONNECTION FEE: APPROVED By: Date O PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARrFT e . Southeasterly 60 feet of Lot 14, Block "B", Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume.3 of Plats, page 76, records of the Auditor of the County of Snohomish; State of Washington, as measured along the Southwesterly line of said lot, EXCEPT therefrom the following described parcel: Beginning at the original Northeast corner of said Tract 14; thence North 39 Degrees 15'23" We 9t along the North line thereof 69.45 feet; thence South 43 Degrees 38' East 54.57 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of 'Tract 14; thence North 39-Degrees 28' 07" East alongthe Easterly line 50 feet to 'the Northeast corner and the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT any portion lying within Edmonds Beverly Park County Road. Survey No. 640. PARCEL B: That portion of Lot 8, Block C, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of,the_ Auditor of the County of Snohomish, State of Washington, West of Olympic View brive and that vacated portion of Sound View Place adjoining said Lot 3, Block C, Edmonds Sea View Tracts. R PARCEL C: An easement for ingress and egress over that portion of said Lot 14, Block "B", Edmonds Sea View Tracts, EXCEPT the Southeasterly 60 feet thereof described as follows: Beginning,at the Northwesterly corner of said Tract 14; thence running South 89 Degrees 15' 23" East along the North line of said tract 102.56 feet; thence'South 39 Degrees 28' 07" West parallel to the Westerly .line and 80 feet at right angles thereto 18.83 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 39 Degrees 28' 07" West 41.88 feet; thence North Degrees 02' West 37.03 feet; thence South 85 Degrees 58' East 29.59 feet to the .true point of beginning. CITY. OF EDMONDS • , im r—c I r I L E: Permit No. Q5a i COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT �` �� 5 9 f RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT . FNG�N Issue Date 5_ MAPFAVAFAWAd A. • Owner: Washington Natural Gas Company.— B. • Contractor: 1 11.'3eMercer Street Name Veliffllddress WA 98111 Mailing Address 1 City State Zip City State Zip 1 � 1 State License Number Telephone Number C. • Address or Vicinity of Construction: 18510 Olympic View Drive Type of Work to be Done. Install New Service 1 D. • Work in Connection With: ❑ Sub or Plat ❑ Single Family ❑ City. Projects ❑ Commercial ❑ Multifamily ® Utility E. • Pavement Cut: ❑ Y 49 N F. • Size of Cut: X No Cuts APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City: of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any �description whatsoevyer, forseen or unforseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its de atitnf�nedr employees iAcf9ding not limited to the. defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court ' osts, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WO MANSHIP ANb MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK: Estimated restoration fees will be held until the final street patch is completed by City forces, at which time a debit or credit will'be processed for issuance to the applicant. • A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call Engineering: 77.1-3202 • Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion. • Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. • Street to be kept clean at all times. • Traffic Control to be in accordance with City regulations. • All street -cut ditches must be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to end of working day; . NO EXCEPTIONS. I understand the above and that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all -times. . Signature: Date: February 8, 1991 Owner or Contractor This Permit Must be Posted at the Job Site For Inspection Purposes Call DIAL -A -DIG Prior to Beginning Work APPROVED BY: a MI PERMIT FEE: 7) g Lt j a Z Time Authorized: Void after days. Restoration Fee: O w Special Conditions: AAA Receipt No:: Fund 1Ft nTrm E- Street C _ $ U RELEASED BY:rim CLDate 5 ' INSPECTED BY Date O NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. March 1989 FIELD INSPECTION (Fund 111 - Route copy to Street Dept.) Comments: Diagram: CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION ❑ YES ❑ NO Partial Work Inspection by P. W.: Work Disapproved By: _ FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date: Date: Eng. Div. July 1985 Addendum to: City of Edmonds Permit Application Engineering Aide Kerry Walsh Washington Natural Gas — 622-6767 x 2588 Oo 1=4 OW A/ e A S AAA KEY: -ss- sanitary sewer -s- storms -w- water 0 water valve Z Q U a a d Q a O U w ca O CITY OF EDMONDS 1 NW mit No. X // `/U7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STM E LEIssue Date � .26'Yo RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A.*Address or vicinity of Construction • Permit Issued To: -i✓O . 60. ;D_f D. -W1 ozgesi D • Owner: 4 A,F DES/ /f/� • Type of Work to be Done: % e!�-JVCAr4 //I/ Name e. OF Za • Work in Connection With: Mailing Address ❑ Sub or Plat J Single Family ❑ Comml. / Ind. ❑ Apt. Condo. City, State, Zip Code • Pavement Cut: ❑ Yes 2� No • Contractor:— S"/VD• CO• ;E`a> Name ZAoet /V(U/V. q5 .-- Mailing Address 01State License Number 4,11AZAiA e N eQ36 -775� — Z// Z City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit must bf avai Signature: 41 - Owner or Agent at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. � dMye/— mate 4t�l — * * THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Time Authorized: oid after 3U days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: Q� Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X _ * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 qTR ` ilUIIDING- DEPARTME ZONE Applicant Fill � (•'• ' PERMIT APPLICATION Inside Heavy Lines JOB�- ADDRESS NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) ' n .. LEGAL LOT"- ❑YES ❑ yEj MAILING ADDRESS /. Z Q '! • �\ �� ��L Y �h �� j.:.J •^ CITY VARIANCE OR COND. USE NO. TELEPHONE NUMBER PROPOSED YARD FRONT NAME !- ALLOWABLE V SIGN AREA Ve PERMIT I ( NUMBER ;_f U. 1980 � Dr��'Lcwir'or I .OT ARE -- SUBDIVISION NO. ADB NO. t9 Z HEIGHT SIDE REAR Z OE PRPOSD Q J SIGN AREA 6 ..'.......... �.�. .. ..�.-.,vv.,�. DATE NAME STREET R/W EXISTING STREET R/W /...i-/�FT. DEFICIENCY THIS PROPERTY Q ADDRESS Q •� r NL %�• COMP. PLAN ST. R/W / FT. FT. E CITY ITELEPHONE NUMBER REM RKS V, U STA E L CENSE NUMBER W CITY LICENSE NUMBER j CHKED Y W 2 �- n -3 C U Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) STREET AND/OR UTI Y ❑ yd S Z W WORK REQ'D ❑ NO UNDERGROUND ❑ YES Z Q —, WIRING REQ'D ElNO IL cf IL �• -�TYPE CONNECTION VERIFIED BY _ tn � � t c� .� �r a W ) SEPTIC SYSTEM ❑ VES PERMIT NUMBER W APPVD BY CITY ENG. ' / 9sN �' lL-fi El NO W REMARKS 0 C, rOT, r METER SIZE SERVICE 512E CLEARANCE CHECKED BY D F D% ,m ic. ✓`pl- / Nf•. M'f "re.4 Fond r),ti i> F t.)c/ t1l e ' I * ­E n III T? I W REMARKS Q r, c. � CS i 11�C7 ScP_V Icy. D 3 NEW RESIDENTIAL GAS LINE FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE NON-RESIDENTIAL ❑SIGN ❑ADD T']. OL— ( �` ❑ i"-L�,A (li l_ DEMOLISH ElRETAINING SPECIAL INSPECTOR REOCCUPANCY OCCUPANT WALL, REQUIRED GROUP LOAD ❑ ALTER D ORFILLD FENCE X—� ❑ YES ❑ NO F PLAN CHECKED BY 6 El PRE -MOVE W REPAIR SWIM a D INSP. POOL REMARKS 13 NUMBER OF ST S I NUMBER OF / /��+ r'r Z DWEL UNI SLING L )rr NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE ALL- 45w l tA Roo L_ '710A 6 Rock PROPOSED USE VALUATION Z �% � / p�-y PLAN CHECK FEE �- Q ��1 V /i 1 �► NO. V I- PLOT PLAN INDICATE BUILDING SETBACKS. ABUTTING STREETS) BUILDING C u N W PLUMBING SD m ,e;-rrac� Q MEAT &GAS LINE FENCE - SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL �^ I v 1 June 20, 1980 File No. 7261 Mr. Hal Reeves Acting Building Official City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Reeves: Reid, Middleton & . &,- � - U a" Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors C Planners )ir. 0! pi, ':';:I : !'Vr,r , , Upon request from Bill Heide, B & H Design, I examined the rockery wall con- structed at 18510 Olympic View Drive. The following observations were made.. The rockery wall is constructed with large three to four man quarry rock. The rock appears to be strong, dense, durable weather resistant ledge rock similar to Monroe Quarry rock. Most of the bottom rock was placed 8-inches to 12-inches below the existing surface. The area behind the rockery was filled with clayey type soil varying in depth from 2 to 5 feet at the rock wall to approximately 1 foot of depth 40 feet east at the base of the slope from Olympic View Drive. Directly behind the rockery on the fill side 2-112 inch minus crushed quarry rock was placed. By scratching the top it appears that the 2-112 inch rock was at least 18 inches thick extending to the bottom of the rockery. In examining the placement of the individual rocks generally they are satis- factorily seated except in some instances a better selection of rock shape 4 h may have been used. Due to the limited number of rocks needed for the wall y �lh selection is minimal. A few top rocks were put on point loadino which caused them to rock. It was suq ested that they be shimmed ua to stabilize them, � s more to correct an unsafe condition than for structural value. f Past experience with several hundred ton of rockery placed in the City of Edmonds, it is my opinion that the rockery wall is more than adequate to support the fill behind it. Since the construction was not witnessed by me, this conclusion is based on the premise that a minimum thickness of 12 inches of gravel was placed behind the wall along its entire length to the full depth of the rock wall and that the bottom rocks were placed firmly in the ground. Very truly yours, REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Forest C. Roff FCR:bb 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Woshington 98020 (206) 775-3434 1p o d N I � o Cl m C� 4 n I 111:1,I0 TO: Building Di.vi.si can Community Development j)cp,irLrnent FROH; Eri ;i.neeri.ng Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: f"Ler reviev,, of the subject building; per.mic application, we have the following ink; comments: li 19� June 17, 1950 ME110 TO: Building Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: 18510 OLY14PIC VIEW DRIVE �Je were requested by San Juan Pool Co. to inspect the above site. The rockery supporting the southwest corner of the pool area was alread;r in place. Pat Wilson, Assistant Cite Engineer, figured calcu- lations on rockery stability and wasnotsatisfied with the job. His recommendation on this job reads as follows: "The -second and third courses appear to be improperly keved into the base course and into each other. This poses a potential hazard to the property immediately downhill from the site. We, therefore; strongly suggest that the applicant fur- nish for our review a licensed Civil Engineer's certification calculation for the stability of the rockery." DS/jf JANE S E . AD PSIS t i June 20, 1980 File No. 7261 Mr. Hal Reeves Acting Building Official City of Edmonds Civic Center . Edmonds, Washington 98020 3 , Dear Mr. Reeves' , Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners !Uri 01980 Dir• 0/ Publir. Yorks Upon request from Bill Heide, B & H Design, I examined the rockery wall con- structed at 18510 Olympic View Drive. The following observations were made. The rockery wall is constructed with large three to four man quarry rock. The rock appears to be strong, dense, durable weather resistant ledge rock similar to Monroe Quarry rock. Most of the bottom rock was placed 8-inches to 12-inches below the existing surface. The area behind the rockery was filled with clayey type soil varying in depth from 2 to 5 feet at the rock wall to approximately 1 foot of depth 40 feet east at the base of the slope from Olympic View Drive. Directly behind the rockery on the fill side 2-112 inch minus crushed quarry rock was placed. By scratching the top it appears that the 2-112 inch rock was at least 18 inches thick extending to the bottom of the rockery. �q\ In examining the placement of the individual rocks generally they are satis- factorily seated except in some instances a better selection of rock shape may have been used. Due to the limited number of rocks needed for,the wall N� selection is minimal.. A few top rocks were put on point loadingwhich causedQ them to rock. It was suggested that they be shinned uD to stabilize them, more to correct an unsafe condition than for structural value. �,t... . Past experience with several hundred ton of rockery placed in the City of Edmonds, it is my opinion that the rockery wall is more than adequate to support the fill behind it. Since the construction was not witnessed by me, this conclusion is based on the premise that a minimum thickness of 12 inches of gravel was placed behind the wall along its entire length to the full depth of the rock wall and,.,tb,a,� the bottom rocks were placed firmly in the ground. ,��' p, "'-�_ Off �N 040 Very truly yours, ,°� wns"''� c2 REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. X Forest C. Roff `�saf F�/STEK4 ,� 110 FCR: bb %�P✓A( CIV��io 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Woshington 98020 (206) 775-3434 1ILF BUILDING D E P A R T M E Applicant Fill USE PERMIT zoNe (' NUMBER Inside Heavy Lines PERMIT APPLICATION JOB ADDRESS � d AJ be NAME (OR NAME OF BUSINESS) LEGAL LOT El YES El NO LOT AREX SU B_DIVISION NO. - yl W MAILING ADD ESS C �/ 7 \_ %i / L /j1 . L� ' p `.,v !� VARIANCE OR COND. USE NO. AD NO. l7 CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER Jar PROPOSED YARDS FRONT SIDE REAR HEIGHT Z Z Q F NAME( ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA PROPOSED SIGN AREA J a U W F ADDRESS OTHER REQUIREMENTS = V CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER E Q PLANNING DEPT. APPROVAL DATE NAME 0:C(� !, L _:�1 Poo 7 L r STREET R/W EXISTING STREET R/W6(//6O FT. DEFICIENCY THIS PROPERTY ADDRESS O G I. COMP. PLAN ST. R/W FT. FT. E H Z CITY TELEPHONE NUMBER RE ARKS 0 Ur5T^TE W yl LICENSE NUMBER CITY LICENSE NUMBERv CH KED B t /�- /v C 0-3u Z W egal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Conies) STREET AND/OR UTILITY ❑YES z WIRING REQ'D ❑ NO O y. TYPE CONNECTION VERIFIED BY a' E C_fi -( ,^ I.� .r ) - ❑ YES PERMIT NUMBER W W SEPTIC SYSTEM O APPVD BY CITY ENG. ❑ NO W ) — IL_ REMARKS H W (yC 7 6 ; rr_c:� ��,5 9 I= , A �✓r ro ,� U J C . •T'^ ,1 J d�'fc i a I/� METER SIZE SERVICE SIZE CLEARANCE CHECKED BY D ` O! ,n F /C. tl / C f'or t Em w REMARKS Q /��'77 / E�l,a M Sec- ir.=.'J� ec: 3 ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL GAS LINE FIRE ZONE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CODE NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN ADO ❑ DEMOLISH RETAINING SPECIAL INSPECTOR REA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT WALL REQUIRED GROUP LOAD ❑ ALTER EXCAVATE FENCE ❑ YES ❑ NO 6 OR FILL ( X_PT) PLAN CHECKED BY W ❑ O REPAIR PRE -MOVE SWIM INSP. POOL E CODED 0 REMARKS Z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF G DWELLING J UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE m ABUTTING STRE PLAN CHECK NO. BUILDING PLUMBING HEAT & GAS LINE FENCE . SIGN RETAINING WALL SWIMMING POOL VALUATION I FEE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHEC[U✓IST POOL 0 BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW GAM ?UAM Poo< sae p, Tad, -dss to Street Right -of -Way Existing_. RE QD p z- Access Easements Existing /OV REQD - H a Utility Easement Existir /1�yNL-� REQD — w Lot Per Subdivision Plat Assessor Map & G / w Site Plan Checked for Accuracy. z Underground Wiring Reqd. H gal Description '-" Check AZZ;2�,&., z Review Date - p w Existing Water Main Size Water Main Required Service Line Required Hydrant Size Existing c4 Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code Size w Detector Check Meter Reqd. H Cross Connection Inspection IS RE VItZG aP 20cuumRFAKcwZs iWUPS o � v SE 191135. Fire Department Comments d 3 Water Meter Charge Reqd. Review bye f Date 4.--16— &0 Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability Proj, Drawing No. File No. Side Sewer Availability w Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee Reqd. 3 Review by. Date w Lo Open Ditch Existing Reqd. Z Culvert Reqd. Size c4 Catch Basin Reqd. Indicate on Site Plan O Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff F4 `n Manhole reqd. Indicate on Site Plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Review by Date Revised: 1v10-1977 Page 2 Street Paving Reqd. ` Curb and Gutter Reqd. w Sidewalk Regd. w Curb Cut for Driveway Reqd. a Right -of -Way Construction Permit Reqd. H Bond Reqd. for Public Inprovements Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Signing Reqd. A .. Pre Permit Site Inspection made on z a BY: S94ER H U w a WATER En z STREET F--1 44 ENGINEERING Special Requirementsrlisted in mem0``to-Connnuzity Development Department, Building Division BY Date o All items filled in on Building Permit Application BY Date a' Drawings Stamped and Notations Made w BY Date d Approved by Public Works Department Revised: lv 10-1977 C-10 r"z I o I � f k 94 RECEIVED ' ' 1 JUN. 13 980�-- Dir. Of Pjb'i^ 'Yorks DATE 111 "10 TO: Ruilclinf; 1)ivi.si.on Co[nmtinity Development -Department FROM; En};i rlocri.ng Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: /moo dew - -Iae After reviev., of: t11e subject building, permit aPPlication, �•;e have the follocoinF; comments 0 r11,ft0P"I June 17, 1950 MEMO TO: Building Division FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: 18510 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE We were requested by San Juan Pool Co, to inspect the above site. The rockery supporting the southwest corner of the pool area was already in place. Pat Wilson, Assistant City Engineer, figured calcu- lations on rockery stability and was, not satisfied with the job. His recommendation on this job reads as follows: "The second and third courses appear to be improperly keyed into the base course and into each other. This poses a potential hazard to the property immediately downhill from the site. We, therefore, strongly suggest that the applicant fur- nish for our review a licensed Civil Engineer's certification calculation for the stability of the rockery." DS/jf I �I° �,- COPY' STREET June 20, 1980 File No. 7261 Mr. Hal Reeves Acting Building Official City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Mr. Reeves: FLE Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners a Et Li v ru JUN 2 51990 Dir. Of Public Works Upon request from Bill Heide, B & H Design, I examined the rockery wall con- structed at 18510 Olympic View Drive. The following observations were made. The rockery wall is constructed with large three to four man quarry rock. The rock appears to.be strong, dense, durable weather resistant ledge rock similar to Monroe Quarry rock: Most of the bottom rock was placed 8-inches to 12-inches below the existing surface. The area behind the rockery was filled with clayey type soil varying in depth from 2 to 5 feet at the rock wall to approximately 1 foot of depth 40 feet east at the base of the slope from Olympic View Drive. Directly behind the rockery on the fill side 2-1/2 inch minus crushed quarry rock was placed. By scratching the top it appears that the 2-1/2 inch rock was at least 18 inches thick extending to the bottom of the rockery. In examining the placement of the individual rocks generally they are satis- factorily seated except in some instances a better selection of rock shape may have been used. Due to the limited number of rocks needed for the wall selection is minimal.. A few top rocks were put on point loading which caused them to rock. It was suggested that they be shimmed up to stabilize them, more to correct an unsafe condition than for structural value. Past experience with several hundred ton of rockery placed in the City of Edmonds, it is my opinion that the rockery wall is more than adequate to support the fill behind it.. Since the construction was not witnessed by me, this conclusion the premise that a minimum thickness of 12 inches of gravel was the wall along its entire length to the full depth of the rock the bottom rocks were placed firmly in the ground. Very truly yours, REID, MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES, INC. f '!•'� Forest C. Ro f' FCR:bb 121 5th Avenue North, Suite 200, Edmonds, Wosl is based on placed behind wall -and that