The URL can be used to link to this page

18606 SOUNDVIEW PL.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII 13185 18606 SOUNDVIEW PL 0_6 00 ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NEA COVENANTS (RECORDED) CRITICAL AREASV. I - I DISCRETIONARY PERMIT ff'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: - PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: DETERMINATION: V Conditional Waiver E] Study Required Ej Waiver I Fm MEMO 1 1" � ki'47 pi 11 �i � �111 a 5 'We TAITUR-m-M, FA 0 WE I 701M, /w, 0 11 1 1 PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: - SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE $: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: (12 <:1, , I ga SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: n GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: LOT: LID #: BLOCK: LATEMP\DSTs\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doc z —i"- N cv�/ ATA 4 ..... . ... zchi t rl CL t 77rc-7372 776-7.372 7'- La zif -a t . . . . . CyFt. . —IS ston- -S"e Bldy va-, Fe�s-. . C, Per, .?es, 7 99 Cr LIP, t, tc:'C rt- ccxt- cn W-1 Cr; ",Ee t."a" -17 -'-rr C-4 ty nor da. '9.ce to '.Z, A-tii n-; th, -it .nsU L iabcr zod& e9- —cut, DI�v City of Edmonds Critical Areas Determination Determination #: CA-92-143 Applicant: I Pinkham Project Name: Permit Number: F Site Location: 1 18606 Sound View Pl. Property Tax Acct #: 1 4346-002-005-00 Project Description: Waiver Criteria (all criteria must be found to apply): STREET FILE xx There will be no alteration of tile Critical Area or its required buffers; xx The development proposal will not impact the Critical Area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, objectives and requirements of the Critical Areas ordinance; xx The development proposal meets tile minimum standards of the Critical Areas ordinance; xx The above findings are based on the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant must follow the requirements of the Building Official for construction on steep slopes (ECDC title 19.05, 19.00-UBC- chapter 70). 2. The applicant must follow the requirements of the Engineering Division for erosion control (ECDC title 18.). Based on the above findings and conditions, the requirement for a Critical Areas Study associated with this development permit is hereby Waived, as authorized by Chapter 20.15B.150 (B) of the Edmonds C0111111U DeveloZpi-ne t 4Coe. Stephen F. Bullock Name Si 4atUre D t *ee 00 00 890 .' , 9,; City of Edmonds Critical Areas. Checklist The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development permit to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are or may be present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review ,the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. With a signed copy of this form, the applicant should also submit a vicinity map of the parcel with enough detail that City staff can find and identify the subject parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). Owner / Applicant: Thomas Pinkham Narne Owner Title % 18610 Sound View P1. Street Address Edmonds, WA 98020 City, State, ZIP Phone Signature Date Applicant Representative:. Albert H. Cohen Nxne Architect Title 330 Dayton St. #6 Street Address Edmonds, WA 98020 City, State, ZIP Phone 7/22/92 Signature Date 00 60. Critical Areas Checklist Site Information Project Name: PINKHAM AAQ-�J 4-u') Permit Number: 2 0 ew pl, Lo,� Site Location: 18 6 10 roperty Tax Account Number: 4346-002-005-0006 Approximate Site Size (acres orsquare feet): 13,534 4346-002-006-0005 Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? no General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? yes Date of most recent action: _ 10 y r ? 3)a Soils / Topography *3 Z; Z 2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mappM soil type(s)? 3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. 2 a -Rolli ' ng: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) I I X Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) -Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on sit e. Comments Sails Repart-prepared & reviewed it time of short plat HydrologyNegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: no 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: no --Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in ' the floodway no floodplain n6 of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? no flows are year-round? no Flows are seasonal? no 8. Site is primarily: nwad6w_; sbPubs'_ ;,mig'ed leared LAWQ_ 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: n a 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: no 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: --------- - --- For City Use Only----a STUDY REQQIRED:.Crid�al areas study is.required. CONDITIONALWAIVER: Critical areas study not required if specifi conditions satisfied. ed WAIVER: Critical areas study is not required. Determination Number k Reviewer Rey 3/27/92 Planner Date REC-EIVE0 CITY OF EDMONDS JUN2 2 1993 SIDE SEWER PERMIT 18 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PE,RMIT -M 03 4 8 9 Address of Construction: Y� 06 S0kMxJUI_P_UJ TI-0,ice- Property Legal Description (Include all easements): EDMONDS 1.1111LAIMIENT PLANI,_ STREET F11 r: . 1, 11 '(� / . I I - Owner and/or Contractor: r- %C- 10 LA State License No. RECKHC)K IZ-1 N E Building Permit No' PrSingle Family El Multi -Family (No. of Units-) 0 Commercial El Public Invasion into City Right -of -Way: Be -No El Yes RW Construction Permit No, Cross other Private Property:Oe'No El Yes Attach legalclescription and copy of recorded eas&nent I % I certify that I have read and shall Romply with all city requirements as indicated on the back of the Permit Card. ' z S '(0 / -Z-lq Date i 6� CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION OFFICE USE ONLY FOR INSPECTION CALL MISIM PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Id -771-od.;Ln Permit. F.ee: Issued 9-y 0,2!� Z. . f 3 Trunk Charg Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No.: - 14?1C Lid No Parti'al Inspection: Date Initial Comments Reason Rejected: Date -Initial Final Inspection Approved: Date (2fV'93 Initia ** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE ** White Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3.190 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F� LID NO - ------------------ - ASMT. NO - ------------------ a OWNER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR R!;X ---- ---------------------- PERMIT No.84SI) JOB ADDRESS -.Q-U-M-0)Qf-W ----- PLACE- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------ PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) NAMEOF ADDITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 Approved: DATE .... By 1 2� W. ------------------------------ APPLICATION for The city of Edmonds Swz SEVirra PERMIT EASEMENT No - ------------------ NEW CONSTRUCTION [] REPAIRS ja:;�'? ........ Y"X:2 PERMIT No. ............... ------- CONTR, OWNER ..... --- xe./ -7 -- ---- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No. -4�0 ................... BLOCK No . ...... 4::!F ----------------------------- ADDRESS . ... NAME OF ADDITION ......... ------------------------- LU U DATE------------------------------------------------ BY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Z4 SVPPRICATI.0' N V�t SE, AM: I - 01 ME --- ----------- p,171 dity,�,of Edmonds * _qpm,. "mV. `4 -'ASE' 1-6. �157; tk, SIDE SEWER PERMIT 4- i-4_ .-/5-/ ...... ASMT. N6:.'."" NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO. --------- ---------------------- PF=t I c� N1 Y, CTOR 1`4 F27TH PEI(i�IT N�- -------------------------------------------------------------- ....................... CONTRA LEGA ..... ................ BLOCK -NO. App�ES S -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. .......... ......................... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF ADDI TION P".P! 7 Jn rj , ........ .......... By:, % DS SIDE SEWER PERMIT CITY OF EDMON WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT PERMIT PT FILE 904a STR the constructi on cove ring any portion of RFFORE ons.) for side sewer inspections sun., or holiday inspecti Call 775-2525 NO Sat., (Inspection will be provided within 24 hours after requst. ........................ P ------------------ ...... . . . ... WTRUcTION ----- ......... Aj[�---:�ESS LOCATION O]F 014 C Ar ......... ------- -- — ....... . ....... ........... N ...... ------ SCRIEPTIO I ............................................ IRTY LEGAL DE ......... puk-zi ......... ......................... ........................ ................. =t ......... . .......... . ............ ---------------- --------------- - ------------------------------------------------------- ..... f�A V*1 ER AND/OR BUILDER ------------- .......................... ... OWN - ---------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------- CONTp ........ ary Sewe ACTOWS N"E "DRESS ion of side sewer to the city san't 19M��Ior repair amd/or connect granted ------- �Nv-�Assion Is Ity of Edmonds ordinances - in accordance with C 4. 9truct side Sewer contractor must be employed to con. E FOLLOVVING. A licensed t to co it has been inspected. ON IS CALLED To TI n.t,uct sewer i Ide property line. A%�'INTI M1 3 1 of the Property may obtain a per a city Engineer's office. ion of sewer before 1—The wner2 t Obtainable from th NOTE NO. t area. Do not cover any Port n of Right-of-WiLY Permi side sewer in stree ht-of-way requires an Invasio ons governing side sewers when You get Permit. of 2%. No bends in grade 2—All work performed in city rig Igulati NOTE No. ance 11.16-030 and RL y line; minimum grade —Obtain full information regarding ordin inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside propert improper NOTE No. 3 ver must have at least 30 due .t shall be responsible for failure NOTE No. 4—TOP Of side sev permitted. sharper than 'A will be d surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors in- reet Must be water settled an completion. p urtenances except to Trenches in at] ork which may develop NOTE No. within one Year Of for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its 8, P w work than is provided y other -n NOTE] No. 6--It is unlawful to alter or do a sert By.! --_--------- the pipe into the wye- .......... .... Date --------------- . ..... a By -------- B -------------- ------ ------------- ....... D te --- - --------- (�&_PPROVED Dat BY --- Date ------ .... Con .... "PROVED iff:x LW.A JL... ks* ...... .............................. ...... .. ---------------------------- . .................................. . ............... ection rvemar -- --- on To Request For Insp- ................................. irm Performing Construction PRI y owner of F piesolf4UST Be Signed B BOTH Peftnit CO] �r installation constructed under this permit ................. ....... ... hereby certify that the side sewL .............. I -------------------- �_ I i e City of Edmonds. pirm Performing Construction) f Contract ng (owner o e with all governing ordinallces of th 19 ......... VV stalled in accordaric of, ---------------------------------- ........................... ........ . ........... day Dated this ------- other sewer power Telephone EFORE you dig for: Water Check B nr - ----- ---------- ..... -- ---- -nil A4, X, , . . ..... f . ... ..... ....... ...... A.. 7: Q5. Application Information W,lication #.. 920734ELDC- Date... I / 11/ 9:3 Permj--�,-. #. 9,;Cj'73,'4R-LDG L .Lte Address ... 18606 Soundvie�., PI ob Name ....... Pinkhaw. Unit it . . . . . . ------------ ---------- Owner informatiori ATA# 4346 00" 005 00 imas S & Linda J Pinkham III., ame ........... ThL .ddress ........ . 316 Main St #B ity/St/Zip .... Edmonds, WA: 980210 ome Phone ..... Wo--rk R-io.ne -------------------------- Contractor Information .ante, ........... No Contractor Assi�jned Cont #... .ddress ......... 'ity/state/zip. ontact ........ Architect. Informat'Lon ........ Albeirt H. Cohen,.' ddress ......... 3130 Dayton -Street .ity/ State/ Z ip - Edmonds,,WA, 98053 ------------------------ Arch # ... 776-737-3 ontact ......... A! lcohen Ph -one.. 776-7373 Engineer Infonnrlation ........... No Engineer* Assigned. Erlgr #... .idre-- i� 'S.tate/Sip. _yj Diiiding and Zor".ing, Data. Zone. . Lot Coverage He ight Front .'Side. . Rear.. N 2. 4. .&W ... I. x Addition ..... Alteration.... Repair ..... Heat ...... 0 ature of' Work.. New Single Family Residence -rc-q , Y)F-Mcy Gr(yup..... Occupant Load. . Tyr Co'le. . SFR-VN Cost/SqFt ...... C,�. a S e ) I 0-:� �I It 14 6'5 Ist story 2445 2nd .--ory Garage. 708 De,:-ks. 14-14, Sq.Ft.. 3910. I�ldg Value .2' 0 8, 3 2 6. 4 0 eviev,, I;tt---e. 595.24 Permit Fee 9i5-7,9 1, . $1 6 5. 12 3rd Story S h e 11 Total Fr -es --,. , 5 10) . 9 9 L-L= -- " h - -,i� '. private J�Mperty f'NLY. A:-; cf%rastru-.ixion c-n puillir- dc-m.ad.r. -.q Yc�rmzit --Ov-�rn work t,- br. elr�) . 01 Hold earmless: Appl.icant, -on behalf of nis �r her hairt-, R!>*�jc m-,d st.%ceasors in jntcrest, z�gree-,�, t(., j7idemnify, defene. and ho.8 harmless tt-;; City -:4 j.ts off-Icials.. �-rjp:lioyeos, ar-d a�4enrs fr*m any ru-,d s1.1 c1a-:W� fi'x dairtage-E:. of whatever naturs, d.irecrl-y or andirec"y frow trie -4G::.-,janc* of Issuance ef this permit chall tint be deemed. lo modify, wp.ive or reduce any requjrsron�nt of any city ordinanre nor �im.it in any :.?ay the Cityle -xb-41ity tc._enforce any ordinanr.,6 1 acknow1edge that .7. I)ave read. th"'r� tht.,t tll,;-. given -',c-. corrbct; wid that 1 ��L 1-1.ne ownev, rr the du---y 4-.;thcr.4af-,3 ,genl-- of ,-hc cv-,�er. I lcjr,,?(-. vo �7c�j--F,'y �:-i�h ci.,Lv And sz�atr, Iawc. -regulatina cons�tvuctir-n ar.6 in doing I -he ;.,orl, n- Pei r, r! W bc- omp?,nv-ed in %,.-o!.At�on of the ct-dfa c.f tht:i Stzte of relitin,: t,-, Wco"kmaj-.'r, Cooillpen-atdon v ation E x v)-: r, Date', LOVELL-SAUERLAND & ASV& INC. 19400 33rd Ave. W. SuitMO LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 LIETTMO 0)'[F TRUSOM OCTURL Phone (206) 775-1591 Seaftle (206) 34"930 FAX (206) 672-7998 To Albert Cohen Design Company 330 Dayton Street, Suite B Edmonds, WA 98020 DATE September 11. 19 2792 ATTENTION Albert Cohen RE: Pinkham Residence RECEIVED I i OCT 0 992 PERMIT, CQUNTER > WE ARE SENDING YOU El Attached 0 Under separate cover via . the following items: • Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications • Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 3/12/92 --- Development Plans as signed by the City THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: V�V% [I For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit -copies for approval 0 For your use E3 Approved as noted 0 Submit -copies for distribution > 0 As requested E3 Returned for corrections El Return -corrected prints El For review and comment F� 0 FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Dear Albert, Per our discussion the enclosed print is forwarded. I calculate that the additional 800 square feet of impervious surface your new design creates would require an'additional 4.1 feet of 36 inch detention pipe. I would expect the City to ignore this as an insignificant change, but I have not contacted them to confirm this. If you have any questions, please call. COPY PRODUCT240 J�Int,Gmtm,Mm(11471. SIGNED: (1111tp If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Pf Kdm 01E0'_r1ECH 5o (IWO V1 6W /0 L. CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 STREET F1 L-E August 28, 1991 JN 91270 Tom Pinkham 18610 Sound View Place Edmonds, Washington 98020 RECF.IVED Subject: Geotechnical Engineering study Proposed Pinkham Residence AUG 1 8 1992 18610 Sound View Place Edmonds, Washington PERMIT COUNTER Dear Mr. Pinkham: We are pleased to present this,geotechnical engineering report for the proposed single-family residence to be constructed in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our work was to explore site surface and subsurface conditions and to provide general earthwork recommendations and design criteria for foundations, retai-ning walls, and pavements. The work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-9558 dated August 9, 1991. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with five test pits. The explorations generally encountered loose to medium -dense sands overlying dense sands at depths, of 8 to 9 feet. Three to 4 feet of fill was observed overlying the loose to medium -dense sands along the eastern portion of the proposed residence. The residence can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on the medium -dense sands. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. if there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. - Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. James R. Finley, Jr. P.E. Principal -n GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED PINKHAM RESIDENCE 18610 SOUND VIEW PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed Pinkham residence in Edmonds, Washington. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity map, Plate 1. Based on preliminary plans furnished to us, we anticipate that the building will, consist of a two-story single-family residence with,a daylight lower floor. Access to Sound View Place is to be provided by a driveway running along the southern property line of the existing residence at 18610 Sound View Place. Development of the property is in the planning stage, therefore only conceptual plans were available to us. The site pl.an given to us included the footprint of the proposed structure, located the existing structures, and provided some topographic information. SITE CONDITIONS The site is roughly rectangular with a width of approximately 100 feet, and a length that varies from about 170 feet on the south side to about 125 feet on the north side. The property is located immediately to the west of the existing residence at 18610 Sound,View Place in Edmonds. The eastern half of the site is relatively level, then the property slopes moderately to gently down to the west. Off the site to the west, the ground slopes downward at a relatively steep slope. Total topographic relief is on the order of 20 feet. A wood fence surrounds the property on the southern, northern and western sides. An existing sewer line and the vacated ocean Avenue right-of-way crosses the property from north to south near the western property line. Low railroad tie walls are located near the northern and southern property lines in the eastern portion of the site. Much of the site is covered by a grass lawn,: while most of the moderate slope is covered by beauty bark. The proposed driveway is currently covered with blackberry brush, and slopes gently down to the west. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham JN 91270 August 28, 1991 Page 2 KR*W1jflF9TX*P_ The subsurface conditions were explored by five test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Soils Exploration Plan, Rlate 2. The field exploration program was based upon t ' he proposed construction and required, design criteria, site topography and,access, subsurface conditions revealed during excavation, the scope of work outlined in our proposal, and time and budget constraints. The test pits were excavated on August 21, 1991 with a rubber - tired backhoe owned and operated by Evans Brothers Excavating. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, -logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 through 5. In general, the test pits encountered loose to medium -dense sands overlying dense sands'at depths of six to eight feet. The dense sands have been glacially compacted and are referred to i n thi s report as gl aci al ti I I . In Test Pits I and 2, located near the eastern end of the proposed structure, 4 to 5 feet of fill and debris was observed above the loose to medium -dense sands. one to two feet of fill were encountered in Test ' Pit 4 in the driveway area overlying the loose to medium -dense sands. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field -logs and laboratory tests: The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types at the exploration locations. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the Test Pit Logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. The logs should be reviewed for specific subsurface information at the locations tested. No groundwater seepage was observed, however,. the test pits were' left open only for a short time. The lack of seepage levels on the logs does not necessarily indicate that groundwater will not be encountered. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham August 28, 1991 factors*. We. anticipate between the near surface glacial till, and in more within the till soils. JN 91270 Page 3 that groundwater could be found weathered soil and the underlying permeable'soil. layers or pockets CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The single-family residence can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing the -medium -dense sands. The native soils are silty, making them sensitive to changes in moisture. Wet -weather grading of.moisture sensitive soils can be difficult. We recommend that grading and major earthwork be conducted during the drier months if possible to reduce earthwork costs. Geotech Consultants should be*given the opportunity to review the plans and specifications as they are developed to verify that site specific subsurface requirements are met. Koo � i"'AA a a Lei � ITIM J19111 HPUT'a a U91M. The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, medium - dense sands, or on structural fill'placed- above competent native soils. See the later sub-sedtion entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL for recommendations regarding structural fill placement and compaction beneath structures. continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of sixteen (16) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively, and should be bottomed at least eighteen (18). inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below footings to expose competent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the overexcavated hole, the overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the'depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending two feet below the bottom of a three -foot -wide footing must be at least five feet wide at the base of the excavation. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham JN 91270 August 28, 1991 Page 4 Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an al-lowable soil bearin? pressure of two thousand (2000) pounds per square'foot (Psf . A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering .-short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is. anticipated that total Post - construction settlement of footings founded on compe tent, native soils or on structural fill up to five (5) feet in thickness will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one-half inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundations. For the latter condition, the f,oundations must. either be Poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or level structural fill must 'be placed around the outside of the foundation. We recommend the following design values be used for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Design Parameter Value coefficient of Friction 0.4 Passive Earth Pressure .350 pcf Where: (1) Pcf is pounds per cubic foot (2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety factor of at least 1.5 be used for design of the foundation's resistance to lateral.loading. 6196116-1 W" I[ K"MOR"19A The site is located within seismic Zone 3 as illustrated -on Figure No. 2 of the 1988 Uniform Building Code (VBC). In accordance with Table 23-1 of the 1988 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Profile Type S2. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham August 28, 1991 GFUMINA JN 91270 Page 5 The building floors may be constructed as slabs -on -grade on competent native soils following the removal of surface organic and debris, or structural fill placed over competent native soils. The subgrade soils must be in a firm, non - yielding condition at the time of slab construction. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select imported structural fill. All slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a capillary break layer consisting of a minimum four (4) inch thickness of free - draining granular structural fill with a gradation similar, to that discussed later in PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the- slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the final grading process to reduce damage to the,vapor barrier and to provide uniform support under the slab. Retaining walls backfilled on one side only s.hould be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following(lrecommended design parameters are for walls less than twelve 2) feet in height. which restrain level backfill: Design Parameter Value Active Earth Pressure* Passive Earth Pressure Coefficient of Friction Soil Unit Weight Where.: 1) Pcf is -pounds per 2) Active and passive are computed using - densities. 35 pcf 350 pcf 0.4 125 pcf cubic foot earth pressures equivalent fluid GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 E Tom Pinkham August 28, 1991 For restrained walls which ,least 0.002 times the wall lateral- pressure of one should be added to the fluid pressure. cannot deflect at height, a uniform hundred (100) psf active equivalent JN 91270 Page 6 The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate only for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a factor of safety of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. Heavy construbtioh equip ment should not be operated behind retaining and founda t ion walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Back,fill Backfill placed behind any retaining or foundation walls should- be free -draining structural fill containing no or3anics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5 percent silt or clay particles and have no particles. greater than four (4) inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Due I to their high silt content, if the native sand soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Miradrain or Enkadrain,. should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall -are. not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham August 28, 1991 JN 91270 Page 7 behind the wall. The top foot to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or -topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The sub- section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. in no case.should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about four (4) feet in unsaturated soils may be attempted vertically. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type at the site would be classified as Type B, and therefore slopes greater than four feet cannot be excavated steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal: Vertical). All permanent cuts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not be constructed with an inclination greater than 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation* to reduce erosion and improve stabil.ity of the surficial layer of soil. M :0111 NUMPAMEGN, PtIPM-MIL11 1111011 We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of all footings and , behind earth retaininy walls. These drains should. be surrounded by at least six 6) inches of one -inch - minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped �or drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 7. No groundwater was observed during our field work. However, seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches*, perforated pipe, French -drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. W TOM Pinkham August 28, 1991 JN 91270 Page 8 The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Any exposed slopes should be covered with plastic to minimize erosion. Final s'ite grading in areas adjacent to building should be sloped at least two (2) percent away from the building, except where the area is paved. All pavement sections may be supported on competent native soils following the removal of the surface organics and debris, or on structural fill placed above competent native soils, provided these soils can be compacted to 95 percent density and are in a stable, non -yielding condition at the time of paving. Structural fill and/or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet or unstable areas. We recommend using Supac 5NP, manufactured by Phillips Petroleum Company, or a non -woven fabric with equivalent strength and permeability characteristics. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, twelve (12) inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by. Geotech Consultants, Inc. after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub -section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL. The pavement section for lightl loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of two M inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four (4) inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or three (3) inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). We recommend that access driveway be provided with three (3) inches of AC over six (6) inches of CRB or four (4) inches of ATB. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. We can provide recommendations based on expected traffic loads and R value tests, if requested. Some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TOM Pinkham JN 91270 August 28, 1991 Page 9 We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and other deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural f i I I . structural fill is defined as any fill placed under the building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should observe site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content which results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill soils is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to com act the lift. in no case should the lifts exceed twelve (M inches in loose thickness. The following table presents recommended relative compaction for, structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath footings,slabs or walkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements minimum Relative Compaction 95% 90% 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade, 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted -dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance. with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham JN 91270 August 28, 1991 Page 10 Use of On -Site Soils if grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to 'import granular fill. The on -site soils are generally silty and thus moisture sensitive. Grading 'operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils exceeds the. optimum moisture content. The moisture content of the silty, on -site soils must be at or near the optimum moisture content as they cannot be consistently compacted to the required density..when. the moisture 'content is greater than optimum. The on -site sand or gravel soils underlying the topsoil could be used as structural fill if grading operations are conducted during dry weather and when drying of the wet soils by aeration is possible. During excessively dry weather it may be necessary to add water to achieve optimum moisture content. moisture sensitive soils may also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. ideally, structural fill which is to,be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should.be measured from that portion of the soil passing the three -quarter -inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that. the soils encountered in the test pits are representative, of the subsurface conditions of the site. if the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in'the explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 Tom Pinkham August 28, 1991 A 91270 Page 11 in test pits. subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Tom Pinkham and his representatives for specific application to this project and site. 'Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and i . recommendations are professional opinions derived in, accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design.. we recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. FavannalwakILM&I-A It is recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc.,.provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implementedin the design and project specifications. It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensi * onal measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Tom Pinkham JN 91270 August 28,.1991 Page 12 The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate 1 Pl ate 2 Pl ates 3 5 Plate 6 PI ate 7 Attachments LJR/BDN/JRF:cka vicinity map Soils Exploration Plan - Test Pit Logs Grain size Analysis Footing Drain Detail Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Lloyd J. Reitz Geotechnical Engineer FIAT., %V A 0 L [EXPIRES 8/17/ 73 James R. Finley, Jr. P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Ef 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 TEST PIT 1 100001� Elevation 54" 11.4. Tan, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, Fill medium -dense (fill). Black, gravelly, silty SAND with organics, fine to coarse T SM 10.6 grained, moist, medium -dense. Gray silty SAND with gravel, fine to medium grained, moist, medium -dense. becomes gravelly, less silty 12.4 TI becomes medium -dense to dense TEXT .... Gray, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to medium -grained, moist, 12.4 M .11 dense (glacial till). Test pit terminated At 12 feet below existing grade on 8-21-91. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. No caving. TEST PIT 2 010 USCS Desmiption Elevation - 52' Tan, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, Fill moist, loose (fill). Black,'gTavelly, silty SAND with organics, moist, loose M 1:1: X (topsoil). SMI, Tan, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, T \ I SM . medium-deme- X ... LIM Gray, silty SAND with gravel, fine to medium grained, moist, medium -dense. S M Tan/gray, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, medium -dense to dense (glacial till). .-F. HT. ... . . Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade on 8-21-9 1. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. No caving. GEOTECH I ONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS PINKHAM RESIDENCE 18610 SOUND VIEW PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by. Piate. 91270 AUG 1991 1 BDN 1 olcj 12.8 7.7 5 10 is ge 1%K of- 5 10 15 TEST PIT' 3 Elevation -,M' Brown, gravelly, silty SAND with organics, fine to coarse grained, moist, loose (topsoil). Reddish -brown, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, s lightly moist, medium -dense. Gray, silty SAND with trace gravel, fine to medium grained, moist, medium -dense. Gray, gravelly, silty $AND, fine to coarse grained, moist, dense (glacial till). Test pit terminated at 11' below existing grade on 8-21-91. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. No caving. TEST PIT 4 Elevation - 64' Reddish -brown, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, loose (fill). (debris present) ........ T11:1 Tan, silty, gravelly SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, 5.0 loose to medium -dense. sm T becomes gray, medium -dense becomes medium -dense to dense Test pit terminated at 8' below existing grade on 8-21-91. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. Minor caving from 2' - 4'. ,,.W4GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS PINKHAM RESIDENCE 18610 SOUND VIEW PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No: Date: Logged by. Plate: 91270 AUG 1991 BDN 4 TEST PIT 5 oo Elevatlon - 70' jo uscs. DescrIptlon Brown, gravelly, silty SAND with organics, fi, ne to coarse ::::::I: \grained, moist, loose (topsoil). T - Reddish-bro.wn, gravelly, silty SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, loose to medium -dense. Tan, silty, gravell SAND, fine to coarse grained, moist, y 5 medium -dense. F SM 1: T-F - -:11 becomes less silty, medium -dense to dense. M 10 Test pit terminated at 9' below existing grade on 8-21-91. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. No caving. 15 ,._Wjf GIROTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TEST PIT LOGS PINKHAM RESIDENCE 18610 SOUND VIEW PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No: Date. Logged by: I Plate:, 91270 AUG 1991 BDN NEW Ll 11111111 Mmm Mmm MENE MENE m m El SAve backfill away ftm BA Sef.x for requirements. WASHED ROCK M/ft. #0VOMEN WorExrX FIL TER FA SMIC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 0 rIGHMNE ROOF DRAIN Do not conflect to fooling drahl. VAPM BARRIER SLAB I 4 "mhL FREE - DRAINING SANDICRAVEL 4"PERFoRArED HARD Pvc PIPE Invert at least as low as footing andlor crawl space. Slope to droin. Place weepholos downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL PINKHAM RESIDENCE 18610 SOUND VIEW PLACE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON .VA No. I DoloI scale I AW10 91270 AUG 1991 N.T.S. 7 6t.-� Ka-M. 98-13Mq.11 Mild- 0 4 RECF-tvED ECT REVIEW CHECKLIS� STREET FU P 00110J AUG i 'PROJECT NAME: PLANFMOCIVAB PROJECT ADDRESS: AZ- RECEIPT DAT c-7 REV! .A, I!, nii i a a e PLAN.. WATER Inil :FIRE --'BLDG.'SEWER S 15TREET....ENG...�. Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment Conditional Use Permit AD13 Requirements Other Zoning Requirements Underground Wiring Required Lot Slope 15% T 6 SEPA Environmental Checklist/Hydraulics Permit Tree Cutting Plan Plat/Subdivision Requirements 9. Legal Description Verification 10 Quit Claim/Street Dedications Easements - Public/Private Engineering Storm Drain Review Fee Engineering 2.2 Inspection Fee I - 4 Drainage Plan (On -Site) Top of Bank, Stream, Water Courses Setba&� Stq- rain Line ,rm D Open Ditch - Eilstin Culvert Required Culvert Size Shoulder Drainage/Shale Op n' Rqnoff ...... 211- Catch Basin Required 22:: Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access Sidewalk Required :�9 A Curb & Gutter Required . ..... .. Curb Cut For Driveway Required Street Paving Required 2 Right -Of -Way Construction Permit Required Street Name Sign Required Other Signing Required Bond Required For Public Improvements FEMA Map Check/Water Table Side Sewer Availability Calculate Sewer Connection Fee If No LID # Create Street File ......... . . . . . ..... X (0 c . . . . . . . . .. . . 7 So ............. �36. ............ Existing Water Main Size Water Meter,Size Service Line Size 0: . . ........ Water Meter Charge Required Hydrant Required Hydrant Size Existing Fire Une Charge Required Sprinkler Street Cut ....................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miscellaneous -, - ME * III--. - * M-- Reviewed By: FIRE PLANNING 9NGINEERING 0 PUBLIC WORKS W. STREET FILE TO: PERMIT APPLICATION REQUMEM[ENTS Permit Coordinator, Buildin Division FROM: Lyle Chrisman, Fngineerin 9 OWNER: 9 Inspector 734- ADDRESS: PLAN cK # DATE:--7/42,/Fz- After review of the subject permit application, the following require., �nts mustb,� met I - Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS .......... 7:00 A.M.-10:0o P.M. WEEKENDS/HOLIDAyS ..... 10:00 A.M.-6:00 P.M 2. A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY- Construction Permit is required for all work on Publicproperty. (ECDC 18.60) 3. Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to permit issuance. 4. Builder/Owner is responsible for containing an teMPOMY runoff and erosion control on site. (ECDC 18.30.030d) S. NO WORKSBALLBEDONE WHRINIS FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROMANY CLOSED DRAINAGE FACIL- 177 BUILDERIOWNER IS REpSONSIBLE FOR I DEN27 Fn NG CON Dr HONS ON T H E DRA NG 6 FILTER FABRIC F WI (ECDC18.30.50G) (ECDC 18.30) ENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION. 7. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, TIGHTLINES, FOUNDATION DRAINS AND CATCH ]BASIN INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFMLING. (ECDC 18.30) ' 8. Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to the Property. If an intersection is involved a handicap ramp may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering Staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit. (ECDC 18.90) 9- Driveway slope shall not exceed 14 % without a waiver. Waiver granted to — -%- (ECDC 18-80.060D) Every attempt should be made to ke,6p the slope below 14 10. Driveways must be paved from Property line to City RIGHT_OF 18.80.060C) -WAY. A separate perimit is required. (FCDC 11- INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED (ECDC 18.30) ON DR'WWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. 12- No burning of construction refiLse without a permit from the Fire Department. 13. Connection to city water system is required. There is a separate charge for the water meter. (ECDC 7.30) 14. A back water valve is required if downstairs Plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20) 15. Water and sewer mainlines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC18.10) 16. Connection to the City sanitary system is required. A Separate Permit is required. LID#- 1,51 -.Fees paid: Yes -- ' No--- Charge-4LS-�2L (ECDC 18. 10) 17. Underground wiring is required on all new construction; and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed value of the structure. (ECDC 18.05.010) F8. A FINAL ENGINEERING INSpEC77ON IS REQU I RED PRIOR yo 'A'NCY OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC18.90) THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCU_ 19. �0. STREET FILE 94p 04-b CITY of EMARONDS 200 Dayton Street - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - Telephone (206) 77572525 Department of Public Works CERTIFIED MAIL Mr.,or Mrs. Ian Prideau 2125 Oak Road Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Dear Mr. or Mrs. Prideau: June 14.,. 1974 City records.indicate that you are the owner of the property located at 18606 Soundview Place, Edmonds, and that sanitary sewer service is available to your residence. Homeowners abutting this sewer main installation had sixty (60) days in which to connect to this sewer service following construction completion, per Edmonds City Code. Our records further indicate that your property is still unconnected. Enclosed, you will find copies of applicable excerpts from the Edmonds City Code (11.16.020, 11.16.001, 11.16.010, and 11.16.240), explaining connection procedures. In accordance with the aforementioned City Ordinances, you are hereby instructed to make the necessary sewer connection. If this connection is. -not completed by July 1, 1974, water service to the subject property will be f&minated as outl1wed-An Edmonds,City Code 11.16.240. The Water/Sewer Department, within the Public Works Department, will be happy to be of assistance to you in answering any questions you may have regarding the installation of your side sewer. Please phone Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer.Superintendent, 775-2525, Ext 26, forany infor- mation or -assistance you may desire. JBM: te Attachments' Mitchell Dt. Admi n. 7—D rt—. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS, M M J. HERB GILBO -n Director M PIP RECEOPT FOR CERTIF.IED MAIL30� (Plus Postage POSTMARK SENT TO OR DATE n' 00 STREET AND NO. 04A. 0' P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE I . I . * k�Z4 A 77 11J 0,2 4r OPTIONAL SLKVlt;Lb PO "M� I R AU FEES whom and date d livered .............. RETURN Shows a se It With delivery to addres e only ............ ECEIPT 2. shows to whom, date and w ere delivered .. 3 8 :ERVICES With delivery to address22 2 y ........... .. Od DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY f.f 5 SPECIAL 6ELIVERY (extra fee required) .................................... PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other sidf ! Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL QP0: 1970 0-397-43 ! SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show address Deliver ONLY where delivered RECEIPT- to addressee Received the numbered article described below 7 REGISTERED NO. 14IGNIATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (Must always be filled in) CERTIFIED NO. SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AUNT, It AINT If REGARDING: 18606 Soundview —ssT Place _7 nTREE FILE Ta-dTr-e R E C 0 R D. 0 F C 0 N T A C T S DATE NAME, PHONE NO., & ADDRESS.of CALLER CO"V1ENTS ACTION TAKEN INITIALS 6/12/74 Ian Prideau Certified Letter was, never sent as TE 2125 Oak Road they had already been notified to Lynnwood, Wash.. make the necessary connection by the Sno. Co. Health Dept. As of this date, no permit has been issued, nor has any contact.been made by owner with this office. 6/17/74 Certified Letter No. 406498 sent Letter received. TE requiring hook-up b� 7/l/74. 9/S/74 Certified Letter No. 406638 sent Letter received. JT requiring to appear in person at office. 9/-9/74 Came into office and signed Letter JT of Intent. 11/13/74 Have received many complaints of odor No sewage odor problem found. JT from neighbors. Herb, Jack, & Larry Ogle went to visually inspect the property. 11/14/74 Larry 0. and Dave Peterson, from Sno. No sewage odor problem found. JT Co. Health Dept., inspected property. 11/20/74 Received letter from Health Dept. stating JT results of inspection. 12/2/74 Certified Letter No. 406641 sent Letter received. JT requiring hook-up within 60 days. 2/20/75 Came into office and obtained permit JT #5144. 2/21/75 Partial inspection. JT 3/11/7S Connection completed. JT oc Sze, A.11 - L-Ll= LUL-U.Lt=, L U.L LIL" purpose of connecting the sanitary sewer system on your property at 18606 Soundview Place, Edmonds, to the City of-Edmonds'.main.line sanitary sewer system., Such connection was required to comply with City of Edmonds ordinances, copies.of which were furnished'you with the .�submittal dated May.1, 1974.. Initially, we were under the.assumption that'there would'be several property owners opting to utilize the L.I.D. method to install'the sanitary sewer from their private facility to the City sanitary sewer main. Presently, within the entire City of. Edmonds, your property is one of only twenty-one properties in violation of City Ordinance, and remaining to be connected. For several reasons, that numberis'not economically.feasible when forming a.L.I.D. for the originally planned purpose. The small size of the Local.Improvement District would carry high contract, interest, administrative, and design costs. This may very well result -in the property ownerpaying up to one-third more than he can secure through private negotiation with a local Side -Sewer Contractor. As a result, it -is necessary to abandon.the idea of formation of a Local Improvement District andi further necessary that.,you comply with the ordinances mentioned by making the.s'ide-sewer connection with in 60 days of the date.of this letter (January 31, 1975).. Extensions of this date may not be granted; therefore,. prompt attention to side -sewer application And payment of connection fees should be initiated. Failure, to comply will result in termihation''of water service.to the subject -in accordance wit Edmon(s City 6 property' h d6 ll.* 1.6.`�40�. Your prompt response would be appreciated since it is not our desire to discontinue your water service. 7 continued Page Two Requirements for obtaining a Side -Sewer Permit are a plot -plan drawing of the proposed connection, the legal description for the property, payment of connection fees, copies of all recorded easements, and payment of the $35 Permit fee. Side -Sewer Permits may be obtained at the Public Works Department, 200 Dayton Street, Edmonds. Please phone Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superintendent, at 775-2525, extension 226 for any information or assistance you may desire. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS S I G 'N' E D J. HERB GILBO Director JHG: t DISTRICT MEMBERS COUN Y C"", ANDTOWNS NOV 2 0 19 Spohomish Health District COURT HOUSE / EVERETT, WASHINGTON 98201 AREA CODE 206 259-9440 CLARIS HYATT, M.D., M.P.H. HEALTH OFFICER DAVID A. STOCKTON, M.P.A. EXECUTIVE A591STANT November 18, 1974 Re: Sewage complaint at �18606-Sound View Place Edmonds, Washington Mr. J. Herb Gilbo Director of Public Works City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Wpshington 98020 Dear Mr. Gilbo: My on -site inspection at the above named house was made on' November 14th with Mr. Larry Ogle, City of Edmonds Public Works Department. The house and surrounding yard were invest'- igated in an attempt to discern any sewage odor or signs of sewage or effluent on the surface of the ground. I was unable to find any evidence that the on -site sewage - disposal system had been malfunctioning, nor could I detect any odor of sewage. For me to make a further investigation, I will need more specific information as to location of any sewage problem at this addr.ess. I can take no further action in this matter unless such information is presented. Very truly yours, David S. Peterson, R.S. Envirormental.Health Division DSP/ mk jqF9 Health Is The First Wealth CITY of EMNIONDS 200 Dayton. Street - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works November 15, 1974 , 11 ttimr. Kenneth 0. Welling City Councilman 18711 Sound View Place Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear.Mr. Welling: At your request,we have investigated with the Snohomish County Health Department,the proper-cy located at 18606 Sound View Place for possible health hazards associated with a defective sanitary sewe septic tank system. Since the Snohomish County Health District is the City's primary representative in health problems, it is their responsibility to classify problems as detrimen-, tal to the public health. An on-site.visit with the Health Department indi- cates that they do not term the present conditions a health hazard. As a re' sult, the conditions at that address are not in violation of the County Board of Health Resolutions, or the State Board of Health Rules and Regulations re- lated to sewage disposal systems. Therefore, to force connection of the subject residence -the only alter- native available for the City of Edmonds is to enforce the applicable Ordi- nances. In that respect, attached you will find a letter that I have earlier today addressed explaining our past program to connect the original 305 sewer code violators. That report, in effect, indicates that there are only 21 pro- perties that could possibly provide further problems in connection. The sub- ject property is one of those remaining to be connected. At the Community Development Meeting of January 18, 1974 it was deter- mined that procedures for the connection of the violators was to begin with the route as explained in our May 1, 1974 letter (copy attached) to those violators. The owner of subject property elected to utilize alternate 2 which allows for an extension until such time as a LID could be formed. My report of today includes a recommendation that I feel will give prompt completion of all connections within approximately 60 days. It is my firm belief that the Department's cleansing of the records has actually resulted in an accelerated removal of all violations to the Sewer Code. With the County Health Depart- ment's finding of "no health hazard," we are essentially bound from actions other than those detailed in City Ordinances. That is, failure to connect.to the sanitary sewer system withimthe time specified will result in termination of water service. If further strength is needed,Ordinance allows the City to render violators subject to fines up to a minimum of $250 or imprisonment in the county jail up to 90 days, or both such fine and imprisonment. Neverthe- less, I am certain that the number of violators will be reduced to a manageable level subsequent to the recommended 60 day period. cc: Mayor . .'Ron Whaley 4ncerely, J. HERB GILBO Director 0% MEMO FOR RECORD 0dr November 14, 1974 Re: 18606 Soundview Place, Edmonds I met with Dave Peterson, of the Snohomish County Health Department, this morning in regards to the complaints we received of sewer odor at 18606 Soundview Place. We walked over the ground extensively and found no evidence of raw sewage or odor of any kind. Mr. Peterson suggested that we re -check the address in January, when the foliage has died down, to see if there is a problem. He also feels that there is nothing he can do at the present.' Mr. Peterson will send out the,Snohomish County Official Report to Mr. Gilbo today. LDO: j t W17d . -i P-3-5-- 01-5- ,4,�/ ".V/- IV71V '7 � �-& C) 75� �t) , N �Aa C, /, o -t2 4 /Y� iu-111- �,/ e4lolti 66 30 77 -fb 1,611 Car C—, ee 7- 7—o ,a "g ;5 4 /v x 7 57 -By 7—o 7- 7 4Z 77 7-b- W7. 7;F,,,t —ZAol-- 1Wq 5 -- -7-6-ge.-Cawa: '57 -.9 77, -7-.7 - -- 4CA71,15A Oc AOV7�F*?- Al 77. 4�7.Aa A/ 5-4 C17 cdo 9 7 74 2 3 77 -47- 7-c—I YAA 111,41 //-'rs ,2 "V C7 111-317 Ala &F40,eD 4?�- 0 0% 1 � 04r CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. or Mrs . Ian Prideau 2125 Oak Road Lynnwoodt Washington 98036 September.4, 1974 Re: Sewer Connection at 18606 Soundview Drive, Edmonds Dear Mr. or Mrs. Ian Prideau: According to the June 14, 1974 letter to you from this office, water service to your property located at 18606 Soundview Drive, Edmonds, was to have been terminated on July 1, 1974. In accordance with the Edmonds -City Code, it is required to connect any property within the City of Edmonds to the sewer, where it is available. it is now required that you appear in person at the Public Works Department, 200 Dayton Street, Edmonds, or contact Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superintendent.,at 775-2525, extension 226, within two (2) days after receipt of this letter to make the necessary arrangement for connection. If no contact is made, your water service will be terminiated. Your prompt response will be -appreciated, as it is not our desire to discontinue your water service. JBM:jt Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS SIGNED J. HERB GILBO Director 00 postage) POSTMARK 110 � 117 hl REET AND 0. UA 1 r P. STATE AND ZIP CODE <1 CD I OPTIUMAL ZILMMES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN � 1. 5n0wS to whom a date delivered ... . ...... 54 RECEIPT . With deliver addressee only 0 A ..... ...... 2.' Shows to whom -;ERVICES , and where delivere 3 0 With d6live'r , addressee, only JL .............. 10 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY k j . . PS Form 3800 CO A G E PROW Apr. 1971 NO INSURANCE 0 ED—' NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See othe i side) QP0; 19700-397.438 SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) Show address —A Deliver ONLY where delivered M to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. tSIG ATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (must always be filled in) CERTIFIED NO. IT, IF ANY JNSURED NO. r DATE DELIVERE SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if 3 0 (ATP-1 z w w Lu PROPOSED HQ\USE Lwu t co F- TP-3 c ij ", TP-2 DRIVEWAY so PINKHAM'S HOUSE I L 16" 1 x I "44TP-5 DRIVEWAY UTILITY TP-4 EASEMEN T ILI 9L 000 z 0 0 co) LEGEND: (A APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN !PINKHAM RESIDENCE -44 GEOTECH 16610 SOUND VIEW PLACE FIVE 'a, t '�A i 2A ATTA" ED If F-A ft.g, fie WALL (01 t7 N es o0e, �u iA L— to LL L -n,*' r c se" t" ey-,� aj e-Y t, a& 6 cr H�u LL (I 6LL ;77.11 z dew pp-14WA-r CL \U L - �,t7IWN Cr-T a I a& o k -ru r- F'l L L Ar-,J� D ON -*r N&e4l, L4 ALBERT H. COH .3r=sirr-j coi%mpAnn 330 OAYTON STRE va surrE r. . Eomoj[ WASA-UNGTON sao;, 1[2061 776-7373 FL G!5, ALL RIGHTS RESEF C)ATE rL 5&. 5 rL,55.6(o -REVISIor%IS '5-7-&7 s4— Ifil; —2ST em RECEIVED cop"y APR 2 7 2005 cirf PERMIT COUNTER PSI- x w(flou co co �F�E I NZ (Ej. < T Y P U) lyp 1 177P p I ljj� lit JAI VsvT �,-u ;riov:?m I � "I f�, Ex. SIPE SEWER TO E3E 6 3EMOVEP-NERIFY L�-ATI m 17frA7 r N N, W I IN IIO'SEWER G,5A.4'T 4 PVC FOO TI N(5 PR41 IN IQ NP YAR'12 6 PVC ROO F ORA I N T16IJ J�LINES.�, I : I k OF.?AtN TO CONNECT PtREC TCy IN (01' PVC TI(G"TLIN -rlo T j TOP --,3. 5 "2. (SEE No E -12 * 00% MIN 1 1. 1 i 1 11 1 1 1 1 o SE�c;, E EX- PIPE To BE F3EAl0VE0' CURRENT N, s FUNCTION OF: CX. PIPE /S UNKNOWN. CONTRACTOR TO I?ETERA4 I NE7 FUNCTION I 4NI? CONNECT NEW SERVICES 45 1 1 4PPRORRIATE. "Ilk N' V�k lx� I Top 42.03 (D P� SEWER INV 3(0.00 REMOVE EX. 'UTILI YAN0 R.R. TIE WALL 84EAC�4 A 0CE:5 AS REQ'P I F-XT:-NI2 E), EAc)CA1fEl%JT\ :5 VER TE� It E, vi E CUFANOUT 'V BE F3C-mtov�p EX. FENCE PROVICIE NEW N, PIPE co" oloE GEWEF? yo. CONNECTION. i-vck5ibts sEweR tr N 50* 3 1' 3 10. EX. 77 WA C C T�V) NZ X Li F-1 CLEANOUT I I ) E, X. "du,-:- -ij U. LL) V)z 1, IA w- C�, L N* RECONNECT \9 e) I FOOTING Ck PRAINAGE Ce' I PROVIOEO Top-5'e-Bo 4,Nv S,—ao 9 IPVC T/6PTC%,INE e 2.00-1.N MIN. I ENP PVM'T7/7�7* uj Lu FdR ROOF (-,-'f�AIN It I I le STA. 1+87 -T It I I I PVC 5EWE' 77 Ite 2.00% A,41&1� PLU(S 0 MARI� C. B.- ao, �T 54 PIA., TYPE Z I z TIGN 10 VC Rcc W1 F?ESTR1CT`OF:;,' FOR FOOTI;\L— c7RAIN(6EENOT 12 'MIN. STO 0-0071� Pl- G& MARI� Z sxl dEWER FLOOR 424?AIN V) iTAR CONNECTITO v I GICE SEWER OFF RAG7 C, 20'SEWEF-3 0'RAINAGE E5M'T- It 11 �R4 IN 41'PVC T16UTLINE\ 7PP 5 1.25, \ \ co 4 e,2 00 '/- M I N. M \ 11 1 R(WF' PR4 IN 15 Y�TEM 1� \\ Ns -\-\ 4.11 \ \j I lb. 11,10 FUTORE 4REA W I SEPER4 4PPFZOk, .,fo BEE, F ILE *�A 12,4, 6 I e wtLL (s, H 14 W) 'r 4,4,? H z t? 2,0 D of, JI \A T— cu '01 0 ul co UJ z 0 -Z . . . . . . 7 Lj CD (p 57 61 el �vO 0 P\A EV Ft� m z .4 P�64'r Lu oo rvg- d rleadlr "I . 1 0 ----------- i z f 0 Lu 2 0 Hg; rr uj 70b rL mr > z L 0 co re, 0 1 1 Pp- I WA-r co w. 76- co 19-S c I L liu 71, t;'AI'U F1 Dip vq t3e, 0.0 N- gio( rl LL FP —a OT A Li c> .140/ DA444, L4 ALBERT H. COHEN .13ESIGN COMPANY Ps. 330 DAYTONSTREET 76 SUITE 6 - EOMONOS, WASHINGTON 9SO2b [20S) 776- a ALBERT HILTON COHEN RckgIstered Arc�hltect ALL RIGHTS RESERVEO frL eo4p 54 DATE 7,31,590 @ REVISIONS 4 0 2 RECEIVED PAGE 10 F OC T 0 1 1992 PERMIT COUNTER OL"'��Op"� FENCE, <TYP', C, N C, IT) CD I N 3 10. 0& A� 50. r 53 W 1110 X EX R. R-'9� E N [�.)A L L Tilk. y 1,41 EX. SIPE GEWER TO BE 0 0150?iAS - 1\ 3 1 Z�- 1 REMOlERIFY LOCATIOt V . ill SrORM. NN , I V V E Et T MI PROV I PE e'-3 1 4 4EC CLEANOUT I I Lk,q + OtTOI`� T6,,COOR�INATE XT 5EWER 5-E-Il 1$*TERF�VJPT/ON,5 ER E5M'T- N q / I ------- ------o 'Nj-r� OWq�F? Oi�7 EX W. EX. "O'Ll I j )SE 7- 17RAIN 4 Ill FOOTt N6 C?f?A I N A N y'l L JA 0 Ix III 6" PUC' ROOF 12RAIN Tk3NW-112NE15 cc I I T40 CONNEC7 PIRECTLY IN7q Uj �'I- P,VL TIGILITLINC Tw- �;3. 5 X 12 0 0 1/. AA III N LL; RE5TRICTO Ca 2. SEE TE LU it I I \ \ I I % I L e— --- 11 '� I, \ E 0 If [jJ N A/ 1 CID F- E PMC)�-V58L,) POU5 -j I I x -J EX PIPE TO BE .9EMOVEC' RRENT Lul I k — I W� CU FUNCTION OF EX. PIPE IS UNKNOWN. I I -T 1 10 W I I T LI) I T- CONTRACTOR TO PETERMINE FUNCTION �C/ 45 1 1 1 1 ( 0 11 3 1 U I ANI? CONNECT NEW SERVICES Uj 4PPROPRIATE.— V) 2: Ek PA 0 L -7 LU VIIA X1 I RECONIl A L EX. ROOF 80 f I e FOOTING 04,�/ INS TO NEW FROVI4e-6WrtE WALL I�x S�MP4 PI I?F?AINA6E COWJECTION To C^\TA I a u l ro 5E0 I PROVICE12 X6 TOP 42.03 l I ' \ REMOVE EX. - 1. 91 OP FILL. l /NV 3(b.00 1 0.6.01 MIN I 0� LITIL Y ANP Ill TIE WALL 0.00 t N, (Y AS RE<�'P vc E To E34 REM EP QC \9 5 S US it I .\ - IRE N x )UTS EA��Il T- TEI�2\� LIJ !��FR E�6 �x 5EWEF� OF'E46EM9T EXT:-:NL? E�, Q EX FF?C VIPE CL4�ANOLUT TO P -5,8.3 (0 10 B EX FEIl 13C REM(OV�p ��OCATE`R T3 'k14-01-PE PIPG PROV/17E NEW I, X— —)Pe W 5 t l GE WER z 1 5106 SE4rR I CONN GC T tO N. A N 5-04�'1'53�'W 1137.00' CCONSTR Ev- eX UThITY Box RELOCATEP VM Xs G "IPOC ThgNT INE 2, 00"l M N. TO BE cc —7ENP P IJT /7 Uj Ltj I' FIR ROOF P IN le STA. 1+877 t/ x -T \ \w FVC SEWER 5TUB 314" WATER\\5ERl a(Do% mlll Pl I C\'v- III -.,TYPE K'� MAFV�IENC� TPI"!CKENEP E(7(9E\ POUBLE WATER SERVIC� 17 1� \ (WATER &INETERS T(-).'E3E I INSTALLEV.,l CITY OF ;I - ao, ),:3T C. 83. 2 10 A- (2)" PVC Ill ORA�N EPMON12q) IN 'C T16PTLI, ST lo 7., IN I bKA'I-N NOTE IN. ONO) I 54 " 121A., TYPE Z tc IVIA4 FOR FOOT, z Wl F?ESTRICT011 I ji X�\\� N z + 6XI E \FLOOR UFAIN TO R �Tu8i— CONNECTiTO SAill GIOE SEWER, W.3'OFF RAC?�`T. C-) FUTURE �MPFF?VIOUS AREA ll REQUiRE Z I ;EPER47ZF REVIE'll A 20'SEWEP� FPIl 8YCITY' CO �j + 0 Q7 RAIN F51.25 4 lz�. .* P. JN 7 �-- 3 7 I �Jc I'Pl T16UTLINE U� Ol MIN. f ��Dd F l I N 5 Y �� TE M i NOTE Fl- 14 TC) 1. EXISTING UTI�ITIES MAY VARY FROM LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. THE 1.—G.. .. C"R4 -x c.'ON Ef�Tk C Till CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DIFFERENCES THAT ARE S, TI JM F To BE DISCOVERED THAT MAY CAUSE A CONFLICT NTH THE APPROVED DESIGN. Tr 6A IN ';�6WJVE17 '— (0 j EX. TOM F 0 2. FCOTING DRAINS ARE TO BE CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. IF FOOTING ELEVATIONS ARE LOWER THAN THE DETENTION SYSTEM OVERFLOW, THEN FOOTINGS \N\ --�O -1�5- 77 l I -I I li� I I . .... 15 SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM DOWNSTREAM OF THE RESTRICTOR CA CD 0 L 0 CATCH BASIN. I �j� Ri fr) (y) IT) 'q I I l S NFU IT) EX. AO0SE CON7RIl TOR TO AU01C2 OAill 7-0 TREC, INCLUCIN6 ROOT SYSTEM. TRENCP Il 6AME LOCATIONqS EX. SEFWEF� MAIN OR EX 42" LU FURTPER EAST.------.------___ MA(-'(-C OL Uj CL O-F-jl-)INAGE E5M'T 4� G, FEIl ANP LU ILL LANOSCAPIN STRUCTURES To BE RE5TOREOI ILI To OF?iGINAL CONPITION ON LOTS EX W0012 I 4NP 2. FENCE x x C. a.** i VACATEO STF�EET-11 EX. ELEC L/AULT---,o1 EX. 3(D" PINE. x— EX. SSM" /�TOF; 3q.Iq INV 33-08 EX 18"CP EX. 16i"l WPARF 5TREET (-E)(. WOOP STAIIl EX. 18"CMP EX. t I 3. TH:S PLAN ALLOWS UP TO 5000 CF. OF ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA ON LOT 1, SHORT PLAT NO. S-7-87, WITHOUT MODIFICATION TO THE DETENTION SYSTEM. 4. ALL ROOF AND FOOTING DRAINS TO BE 4. PVC @ 2.00% MIN. SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 21 q LID, OL YARIC fOUND9 Y NO. - 5(354, Offiff MfAf APEN1116 4$ DAIC:l LYl 1ADMER I(RMMIC70A 0 VISIBLf 9) ONf ED6f Of 6M ZE - CNAIN, ZWZB ISLA Cx WIVZN 6A rf l /S DOWN. Alylo Will W FR�ME CL L I FT 6,,l l I t-6 -08, CASCADE C-ULVeRT' INc. all 14.0PE. -- —Al - .r t1fAAA#C4ff 5 11 HO L e 3 /a , D1,4. M 1Z 6AIME PLATE WeLD 70 CIMP CA= ORIFICE 70 06 SH,,l GOOG el OR] L-t-eO. 70? Of W 7f fl-. 4 3. 0 1 r hfll 0Y,4Rfj,0iYfL. 41.25 7— Z40 JZAADAW OALV LADDER. MIN JTEPJ (MICAL) 1WV 137 1 1 W! 0. c?3'- 3&<2MP ZIP— Typt 2r- Me# ADA31N #omwi izeezownll JIIAMCAf A(XTAe $AZf,4#- IZZOMP COAMP W144411AIT crmml 0 OA OfTmA. tATC11 BhJ111 IYO. 2 Alf STA ICTOA Df TAIL #Irlf PROJECT LOCATION- M41N ST V. A RIN A 7- LIJ D, Uj �j �j LU 00 00 F-Iff I II-Q, 7, PR I VF WA',,' SOON[) IEW PLACE LU 00 (x) q(0 T" I STREF-T S.W. 3 U) LU 19 [-I ST. S.W. V/(f INITY MAP 5CALE' 1"3000' 115',4 C CE55 UTILITY EASEll 25' R- OF 7)41CKENEP E17GE 4" mom Ills 2," M/N. COMP7 pFPTU, CONCRETE '2" MIN. COMPT PEF7/4, CRil 5(jRFA(:1NG,TOP COURGE 4" MIN, COMFT VEPTt4,CRU5"E12 SuPFACIN6, BASIC COURS4 G"GRAVGL SASE, CC'13"�MQY SE REQ'l PENCIING SOILS C-0. -TYPICAL ROAl2 SECT10N N.T. S - GENl NOTES. 1. LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONIS) OF ALL UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION' ANDSTANDARD PLANSAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS. AND ANY REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED AT CITY HEARINGS ON THIS PLAT. 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF HIS SCHEDULE IN SUFFICIENTTIME TO PERMIT INSPECTION PRIOR TO AND DURING THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK WITHIN THE PLAT AND CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF THE ENGINEER. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL13E RESPONS16LE FOROBTAINING ALL PERMITS FORROAD AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. 6. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION COLLECTION FACILITIES TO INSURE SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRADING, AND SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE POTEN TIAL OF ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 7. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONCRETE (CP) NON - REINFORCED, ASTIVI C- 14 124'DIAMETER AND LARGER TO BE REINFOACED, ASTM C-76). a. ROAD RESTORATION SHALL BE PER CITY OF EDMONDS STANDARDS V14ARF STREeT 9. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM DRAINAGE SYST Em 10 ALL CATCH BASINS TO HAVE LOCKING LIDS. DEVELOPER A.R. CONSTRUCTION 6306 - 215TH ST. S.W. MOUNTLAKE TERFACt, WA. 98043 PHONE: 775-9346 BENCHMARK INVERT OF SEWER PIPE OUT OF MANHOLE LOCATED NEAR THE WESTERLY SIDE OF SUBJECT LOT 5. INVERT ELEVATION = 36.00 NOTE TOPOGRAPHY AND BENCHMARK DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN WAS TAKEN FROM BOUNDARY f TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PREPARED BY ANDERS LAND SURVEYING, JOB NO. 561, 6- DATED MAY 27, 1991, - EXPIREiS 7/601djl RECEA VED OCT u 1', PERMIT COUNTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2om A V1 ad PL, FOR ART RUNKE-L IN NE 1/411SECTION 13,T27N.,R.3E.,W.P CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTOI 1) REV PER CITY REVIEW 3- to _q? Ml MM.6% Loveli-saueriand & Associates, I qmmk Engineers /Surveyors / Planners / Development Consult� 19400 33rd Avenue W., Suite 200 - Lynnwood, WA 98037 - (206) 775-1591 - (206) 340-( DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE MM I cc 2_7(3_'�2 1 F.B. - I " z FEIX No. 2 7 S., SH EET I Of vk w m ATT17v-d 5-D c- -r + -r-9 roel ��f, H L c r '14% ALL RIGHTS RF=SERVEI DATE 7,31, � 0 REVISIONS RECEIVED APR 2 7 2005 PERMIT COUNTER E"';'TREET FIL E os— 4S 'Tt -----�[LA- Qco (L RECEjveu,� APR 2 7 2005 PERMIT COUNTER