18703 SOUNDVIEW PL.PDFIIIIIIIIIIIIII
13190
18703 SOUNDVIEW
PL
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL.
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE) #:
COVENANTS(RECORDED)FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: Conditional Waiver XStudy Required El Waiver
CRITICAL AREAS #-.:
DETERMINATION: Conditional Waiver El Study Required ]AWaiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORD FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER — list permit
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
Liu
[0107
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
LOT: IBLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: a
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE/ENC ROACH M ENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
L:\TElVlP\DST's\Forms\Jana's Street File Checklist 5-14-08.doc
k 13703 Sweid V'vetz
0 sic-ez� Fu
P-Zq� tO PhMnq DepartMent City of Edmonds
From: John and Karen Launceford
bate: 8/17/2008
Re: Tree removal for Permit #2007-0695
AUG 18 2098
DEW
.Lo, N- E
W
bUQ"EftCES
After selecting a,pneral contractor for the above noted permit, it has been brought
to our attentiowo accommodate the plans submitted to the city of Edmonds for our
residential remodel, that a number of cedar trees should be removed to allow for the
construction to commence. In reviewing the plans with Jennifer Machuga on Friday, we
identified up to 9 trees on the west half of the property that we will be removing.
The approximate location has been identified on the permitted copy of the site plan
now in the city's possession. These trees sit on the southwest side near the driveway
and the northwest side of the lot. Both areas will be impacted by the new required
drainage plan.
Additionally, there is a tree on the southeastern quarter of the property due south of
the approved new addition. The tree sits on the property line and the root system will
be impacted by the digging for the new foundation. The root system is surely spread
out beyond the 10 foot setback and the 5 foot setback for the proposed stairs. Our
neighbors, George and Linda Murray (18711 Sound View Place) have agreed to allow for
the removal of this tree (at our expense) to prevent the possibility of it becoming
unstable after the project. The tree is already split just above the base into two
shoots and those are further split into multiple shoots above. Attached please f ind a
note indicating their approval.
We are requesting that you note the tree removal on the existing permit and include
this information. We would like to begin the removal process this week so that we can
begin earthwork shortly. As requested by Jennifer, we are including below the
signature of our neighbors as indication of their approval of the removal of the tree.
Again, thank you for your prompt help on Friday and for your quick attention to the
matter. If you have any questions, feel free to contact John or I at 206-755-9101 or
our General Contractor, Murphy Building Co. at 206-730-4794. Have a nice day!
Karen A. Launceford
APP WED 1B1Y PLAANNNNINNIGI
me
vu
r rem" -nd;c4d
August 17, 2008
City of Edmonds
Dear Sir or Madam:
We are aware of the request by John and Karen Launceford to remove the Cedar
Tree that crosses from our property line onto theirs in conjunction with their pending
addition. We have agreed to allow for the removal of this tree since the root system
will be impacted by the addition. Please accept this note as an indication of our
agreement to allow for the removal of the tree at the expense of John and Karen.
Sin rely,
George and Linda Mun
18711 Sound View Place
Edmonds, WA 98020
I EiA;N NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORT I RANGM EAST, W.M.
ELEVATIONS M BE FIELD VEND
QUIE. Ino
IE= 99.75
T
/IBQ4'
L
SL_ I
(USED FOR EASTING PATHWAY\
SM LOG)
LU
\j %, o
AREA DR CONCRETE PRCDI EXISTINC DECK
DUAL)
_N) NEW S4r"
(PERC RSECD)
4' 0 E 55 LT. r2"\ EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
WILl LATION TRDICH UPPER rlR EIfV= 1211 1
MAN FLR REV z , 19131
EXERCISE IN ELK FLEV: 11681
Dosw CONC. EXISTENC PORCH
SPORT COURT
�_2 _AE NEW STARS 116 n
L(PERC lifTED)
f r TAU "0
KEYSTONE BLOCK WALL
9-01
(PERC TESTED) EXTEIING CONC. WALK TILSO
0
SL-2 DISHING SPORIVDMI WAS
ED
(USED FOR NCLUDIED
0 0 PROPOSED 0 1
SOIL LOG)
=D=7 DIT
WpurAL)S PROPPSED AD ION
WIN FLP. [IfV.- II&BI
---y %7-' AREA,
DRAIN #2 LPFfIt FIR [LEV, 120.31
Ir TYPE 12
0 'F Is wt I RLINOFF moof TIM X
BY CLIZ CD cl
RIM-_ LOCH) ST INSTEAD OF STARS ALONG
f 102.40 5 S)
ORMEmy co
IE= 101.75t OF MUSE
A BY CR aNCRETE PRODLXA
11515
S,2/ (OR EWA)
WER AS
FOR DMOAY GRAIE N
1E. lug (r--E)
#
.7-7
Li v M — — — — — -
(DIRRIEWAY) L IWT LK R/
Ram III jaI�'
6 "N :,DOM AgMT,,
;z\
22t �v
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN �Al A2
s - r ur
El IFACE OPTIONAL-1 10 0 5 10
OBSERVATION PORT
OPTION&. is' TYPE a 4'-6' PVC PERE PIPE
CAPPED OBSERVATION PIPE AREA GRAIN
WITH 4 OR 6- PERFORATED PIPE 6' RIM FW-'4fD CROUND SURFACE NATIME BACKFILL
PERFORATED PIPE
DOIJBLJE LAYER FILTER FABRIC
17-1
Fl 6'
(Ir MN OVERLO)
E�3- ljTF 12, MAX a
MH amiLLMLLM-111111111111-T,
Ir 111 . - VARIES COMPACT BACKIII.L.
MAX.
L
1 6' RIM PERFORATED
0 67 0 PFIE LAID LM
LEVEL MON. WASHED ROCK
0 1 /DVERFIDW PIPE W/ _11 0 7 1/2' - 1/4'
6' Pvc DOWN FLAWED ELBOW 2 F1 WRAP GRA,,n VA14
SEE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FILTER FABRIC SECTIONS
0 D ON TOP AND SIX Of TRENCH
I E
WASHED ROCK
011 i I In'-314' 0
777,
M Lo PCMo'UN& Elt
r PNIC . \ 1 6- PVC
_t
Ob
L 1-111-11 1=1 11-11 1=1 I 1=1 11-1 —11 1=1 11: ::111 DOWN TURNED EMN
W I I I lEd I EE 48' l4i =1 Ell 12' IN C8 OUTLET PLPE
A
LI'll I' d I
55 LF. SECTION A
A FRENCH NTS
ROOF RUN, TION TRENCH Pin&)& QPNIEWAY CQ
WS ) U3 NTS
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OIRj BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-
4= 4m
-0-
MONEFERING
250 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 2DO
EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 779-8500
FAX (425) 778-5536
Cl
z
m
m
2
w
DESIGN: Jpu
DRAWN: JRP
CHECK: Rms
JOB NO: 07215.20
DATE: 09/28/07
z <
0
Lu
0
LLJ
z 0 <
Ld 04
0
L' co
Lj — (n
>
m < old
Z
ac =)
0
00 vi
L� (n - z
0
LLJ —
L) W) z 0 r
z C) 0 <
=3 r- :2
0 0
SHEET:
C3.1
.800-424-5555.
PLANNING DATA STREET F�Ik]
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Name:
Site Address: V, jogj&' g,
/ f -703
Plan Check #: 2-C)0-7 06 9S
Project Description:
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES /4E)
Zoning: S—
Map Page: 3S
Corner Lot: (YES kg�
Flag Lot: (YES /00
Critical Areas Determination ff: rE4 7_oa-20059
K-Study Required 6a."rjs ?1�& q Cf-0 t,�n ket -Z C-
11 waiver
SEPA Determination:
W-Exempt q7 2-
11 Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of grading) ?
0 Fee 0 Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form
Requih�_ cks
StWet: 75-
e:
S� /0
Side:
1 5 ( 0
Rear:
16-
Actual Setbacks
Street: tAAC,(
Sid��'
Side:
Rear: Z-5-
Ba'-Detached Structures: corA
El Rockeries: s7-" e_ AIL
El Fences/Trellises: 7) remov-0
11 Bay Windows/Projectin Modulation -
Inc
e o4-cack,S a + UA
IA.'Stairs/Deck: KOW1 Lcl a^ AorX pc �Xo S
- Height
Datum Point: NVJ
Datum Eievation:t,00
Maximum Height Allowed:
4 3. Z,j )
Actual Height: q 156)
Offier
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Lot Area: 7- Y,
Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed:
Lot Coverage Calculations: ck-..s Lpa rJe-5 r S- s
ADU Created: (YES / NO) A-00
Subdivision: ft
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES / 1, 00
ge I Comments
A_-?' C-04 C.57'
11-& 16 7
1-1-7-5.(3/q A,0j Z�!
fJ3 -f-- 2 S-:-
I k
'IL
ntcl
Plan Review By: k�� 6110�0 E
Ptarmir� Data form 04-11-06.doc
Critical Areas Checklist CA File No:-CRA- QM_7 _00?_9
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: 167`03 SOUtip VIEW Pt.&CF.. 5V1%'%0N1>5 91%0ZO,
2. Property Tax Account Number: 004 3-46 001- 007-00
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Z3 1 5 7-1 15.F
4. Is this site currently developed? ?� yes; — no.
if yes; how is site developed? EXISTt"4 SlNe4u'::� F-AM�L_y
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generall� less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less tfia n* 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth: N_/A
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ;Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?: N -/4
8. Site is in the floodway N f1bodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface?, Flows are year-round?..
N 0 Flows are seasonal? 14 0 (What time of year? N/ A J.
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: NO
For:City Staff Use Only q
1.
Plan Ched Numt Oli�able�'
k if ap A
2.
Site is Zoned
3.
SCS mapped soil- type(s)? a C�- ci-� Az a5
4.
Critical Ar6s inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site?
Acen,
5.
Site within designated ear th subsidence landslide hazard area?
$,-zzrd Ac-e-,
DETERMINATION
Ecez�:t�� Ar-e--e— —
STUDY REQU ED WAIVER
Reviewed by: . Date:
Critical Arcas Checklistdoc/2.17.2004
#P20
ED&O City of Edmonds Date Received: CZa2/c--)--7
City Receipt #:
Development Services Department
Critical Areas File #: CRA,- DOCa -00? 8
Planning Division Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00
Phone: 425.771-0220
? Date Mailed to Applicant*
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas arg, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent
information (e.g.. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable
attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I arn authorized to fil is applij, Ulhe he owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPUCANVAGENT DATE U,&J
Property Owner's Authorizatio
By my signature, I certify that I have thorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. _,,
SIGNATURE OF OWNER 4
�AQAppfieant:
J064W LAQ-AJ Ce FO P-E>
Name
I,%-70-5p 'S0UNr-,-;1 Vaw pt-4.<.E6
Street Address
M 0 rAA 0 t4 C* WA Olil 0 ILO
city State Zip
Telephone: A%5 - "'? '74 3V
Email address (optional):
J LA un C e-row- A & -L& P C. F A - C. 0AA
DATE 0.4-
App4cant Representative:
. -rHIL.
Name -
s i o r- i RsT sovrm
Street Address
SF-ArrrLE wA (JS 104-
city State Zip
Telephone: 7-'0 4�O 3 tz>-74
Email Address (optional):
1, . . -1 6 40
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location:
18703 Sound View Place
Tax Acct. Number:
00434600300200
Determination:
Study Required
Determination #:
CRA-2007-0098
Applicant:
Phil Kallsen
Owner:
John Launceford
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED
During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site may either contain or be
adjacent to critical areas, including Landslide Hazard and Erosion Hazard Areas, pursuant to Chapters
23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC).
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property
that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts
resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an
alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the
option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting
until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit
the entire study with your specific development application.
Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in
ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas
(see below).
Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the
ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved
list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more
information.
General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through
23.40.140.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area.
A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and with a
vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock).
Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.B.
In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific
Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer.
Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer.
The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced.
The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback
per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050.
The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060.
In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design
standards listed in ECDC 23.80.070.A.3.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas
include:
Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or greater.
Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular
soils and springs or ground water seepage.
0 Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing
landslide deposits regardless of slope.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS
Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria.
For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an
erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in
Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's
discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G.
In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require
a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is
important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance.
Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D.
Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070.
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If you have
any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed activity, please contact
a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If
you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner for more information.
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City
of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
2
0 'M�000 REET
C.EOTECH 51
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Celebrating 20 Years 1986-2006
F ILE 0
13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16
Bellevue, Washington 98005
(425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561
RESUB July 27, 2007
AUG 0 6 2007 JN 07156
John and Karen Launceford BUILDING DEPARTMENT
18703 Sound View Drive Plac6 CITY OF EDMONDS
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study
Proposed Residence Addition
18703 Sound View Drive Place
Edmonds, Washington
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Launceford:
We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed addition to be
constructed on the eastern side of your existing residence and property in Edmonds, Washington.
The scope of our services consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then
developing this report to provide conclusions and recommendations regarding the geotechnical
engineering aspects of the project. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our Contract
for Professional Services dated April 11, 2007.
We were provided with a site plan that contained topography information. Kallsen Architecture
developed these plans, which are dated June 15, 2007. Based on the plan, we understand that the
proposed addition will have a slab grade of approximately 117 feet. Cuts of approximately 5 to 9
feet are needed on the upslope, eastern side of the addition due to the site grades. The slab of the
addition will daylight to the grade of the residence or driveway on its western side. The plan also
indicates that a bearing capacity of 1,500 pounds per square foot has been used to design footings
of the addition foundation.
If the scope of the project changes from what we have described above, we should be provided
with revised plans in order to determine if modifications to the recommendations and conclusions of
this report are warranted.
SITE CONDITIONS
SURFACE
The Launceford residential property is located on the eastern side of Sound View Drive Place on
the northern side of Edmonds. Olympic View Drive is located on the eastern side of the property.
The existing residence is located near the middle -northern portion of the property, while a driveway
is located near the'southern property line on approximately the western 3/4 of the property. The
overall property rises to the east from the street. It is mostly gentle, to moderately sloped. Just
east of the residence and driveway is a relatively short rockery. A yard area on the eastern side of
the site slopes moderately upward from the rockery. The inclination of this area is about 25 to 35
percent. Near the eastern property line, the ground slopes upward more steeply, ending at
Olympic View Drive. The inclination of this slope is greater than 40 percent. We did not observe
indications of instability of the slopes on site or between the site and Olympic View Drive.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
0
Larry and Cathy Rodden
July 27, 2007
SUBSURFACE
JN 07156
Page 2
The subsurface conditions in the area of the proposed addition were explored with two hand -
excavated test holes on April 6, 2007. One was excavated at the northeastern portion of the site
near elevation 130 feet (based on provided topography information), while the other was in the
middle of the eastern yard near elevation 122 feet. The middle test hole revealed about 6 inches of
loose silty sand soil overlying dense, native, silty sand soil. The northeastern test hole revealed
about 3 feet of loose to medium -dense, native, silty sand that then became medium -dense. This
soil became very dense at approximately 5 feet.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
GENERAL
THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A
GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE
CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD
READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT
The development of the proposed addition is very suitable from a geotechnical engineering
standpoint in our opinion. Medium -dense to dense, native silty sand soil was revealed in test holes
excavated in the addition area at shallow depths, and we did not observe signs of instability. The
addition can be founded on conventional footings as planned.
The area on the eastern side of the site where the addition is proposed is sloped between 15 and
40 percent. Because the site soils are silty (classified as Alderwood soils per the Soil Conservation
Service) and have this inclination, this area is classified as an Erosion Hazard Area per Edmonds
Code (ECDC). As noted earlier, we did not observe visually or via the test holes indications of
slope instability. Therefore, per ECDC 18.30, an erosion and sedimentation plan is not needed.
The slope that is at and east of the site is inclined greater than 40 percent and is just over 10 feet
tall, therefore is designated as a Landslide Hazard Area per the ECDC. The minimum default
buffer that can be applied to a site adjacent to Landslide Hazard area is 10 feet per the ECDC. We
believe that the minimum buffer is very adequate for this site because the area is underlain with
dense soil and we did not observe signs of instability. A 15400t building setback from the buffer
also applies per ECDC 23.40.280. Therefore, an overall minimum setback of 25 feet is needed.
The site plan we received indicates that at least a 25-foot overall setback is planned for the addition
from the steep slope near the property line.
Temporary excavations 4 feet or less can be made vertically. Temporary excavations that are taller
than 4 feet in height can be made vertically on the bottom 4 feet, topped with a 1:1
(Horizontal:Vertical) slope. The excavations needed for the addition can be kept within the building
setback noted above based on this recommendation.
Foundation drains should be used around the addition perimeter, except for the western edge.
These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch-minus, washed rock and then
wrapped in non -woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its
highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor
or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water
drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. For the best long-term
performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains.
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
9 0
Larry and Cathy Rodden
July 27, 2007
JN 07156
Page 3
In accordance with Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC), the site soil
profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type C (Very Dense
Soil). The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction because of their dense nature
and/or lack of groundwater.
The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to
prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active
seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from
the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the
concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and
bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable
conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist
air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may
be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential
vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or
mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure.
Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the
recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan
review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include
revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical
constraints that become more evident during the review process.
We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report
should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and
recommendations.
LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as
they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions
encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the
subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those
observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions
and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are
commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil
samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such
unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly
constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to
accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all
projects.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the John and Karen Launceford, and their
representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and
conclusions are based on observed site materials and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and
recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of
practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is
expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction
safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
0 0
Larry and Cathy Rodden
July 27, 2007
JN 07156
Page 4
techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for
consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for
biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site
development.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide
geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm
that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate
whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the
recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the
event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction.
However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the
contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements,
will be the responsibility of the contractor.
During the construction phase, we will provide geotechnical observation and testing services when
requested by you or your representatives. Please be aware that we can only document site work
we actually observe. It is still the responsibility of your contractor or on -site construction team to
verify that our recommendations are being followed, whether we are present at the site or not.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we
-may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
D. Robert Ward, P.E.
Principal
cc: Kallsen Architecture
via email to: phil@kallsenarchitecture.com
True Era Builders — Chris Clayton
via email to: cclayton(cNrueerabuilders.com
DRW: jyb
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
PIANNING DATA STREET FILE
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Name: 6aA,16e- Date
Site Address: .187o3 w-epli Plan Check # 6
TQ
Project Description: Add ccAr
Reduced Site Plan Provided.- (YES Zol J.
linc
Map Page:
Corner LoU (YES
Flag Lot: (YES /(9
Critical Areas Determination ff: C--eA-
M—Study Required
El Waiver.
SEPA Determination
N��pt 4(77, 0
�
El Needed (for over 500 cubic yards of gradi g )
0 Fee El Checklist 0 APO List with notarized form
F ReqiiirLyl - tbacks
Stree Si(le-.v 10 ide-- R
'a, /a V 7cks
Street: Side- va ide: Rear:
T( W,091,4�,r 'etc
I -re I 7
El Detached Structures-
19� �__ f < 3'vvLr orti�nal Jr-qCk__
(N 1.1 C9
Fences/Trellises.
El Bay W;nins/projFctinq Modulation
Stairs i2c 4^ 60 0-1 (Arvour
�S L&&CV _ rn4 < W 6o 4- 5k)u 6�_ o(Wo
!�7�—
I �
U V Helqht ts 16
Datum Point: Datum Elevation: �OD r-&t&&4
Maximurn Height Allowed: ActualHeight.,
Other
Parking Required:
Parking Provided.- 2-4—
Lot Area: 25—( �_Z Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% Proposed:
70
Lot Coverage Calculations:
ADU Created: (YES At 5 (e o 141 -_ JA
Subdivision:
Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued (YES 19) #e,— /I or #U(I
Calc Comments
Z-
11AJ
q
(S
Plan Review By:
PtdfWiC9 Data Fo"n 04 -11 06,40C
M I �('e'
City of Edmonds
Response to Item 6
BJY # 030731-043
JUN 3 0 2008
During a meeting with the city engineering and planning departments, we reviewed this
issue (it was an impromptu discussion and you were unavailable) My husband John
contacted the city in 1995 prior to placing the wood deck over existing patio (we
moved in in 1994). At that time, he was told by the city no permit required as long as
it was 18" or less above existing concrete (actual as built is 9"). Further, site was
waived as not a critical area based on review completed by city in 1997 (see June 16,
1997 Critical Areas Checklist determination) as part of 1997 addition. Existing deck
was in the drawings then and no comment was received when plans were reviewed and
approved (see plans prepared by Behm Design approved 9/26/97). Owner acted as
good citizen in both cases and received acceptable review from city. Additionally, this
issue is being called out for the first time on June 12'h after the plans were originally
submitted for first review June 2Vh of lost year. Request city accept prior efforts
of homeowner who followed all city requirements in laying deck over. We would be
happy to meet to discuss this issue if necessary. Thank you. John and Karen
Launceford
z
'7
LU U
L) 0
'Li
-j
(n ILL-
0
<
C)-
z
z
W LU
J 01
LIJ Lu:�
z
LLJ
b
NUMEIFR
PERMII
CI CY OF EDMONDS
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
- 1'JC
PUB�IC AIGWT OF WAY FkA.OFFICIAL �7"W VAI W
zw
U- I—' P, 0
IURIS R,-
D" FS O..0 0
it,
RE.An,!;
Zip UMBEP - ie
CITY e- rl
I , L, I , C,
0 I'S
C)
IF P
51.
T I �l
_r�Tl LICENSE
,ILjdc all eas-111
i I Lea 7;1er �y L
Pro rly
T Accou
P .,c.1 No.
RESIDENTIAL
RLUMBINGWECH
COPAPL ANCF OR
Do.
"'N
C,,,,,r RCI AL
CHANGIE OF USE
OLDG
SIGN
C-D11C
FENCE
CIDS
L_ . —FT)
11000s"OlE.
SWI!Xi OCOL
,JLISq
"SEPT
HO. TUB,SPA
f:�:4 GAR��GE7
CAR, OR
F� RETAINING 'IALL'
j FinCi, , Ile
RENEWAL
,Lj,�I,NESS OH ACTIVITY) EXPL�I.N,
g (7,pf, OF 'LISC
14L I- 'I A (- I 0�
'u,"r.,
,
NUMB EP or 9�
In
D"EILLI t4C A'
1z_
'I)TOri,ES
1.1a[H _�L
UESrRtVE �OPK TO HE DON E (ATTAC. PLOT PLAN) 4
(zr-
IIE11 SQUIIIE IZ!NG
12
Plan 64ck No. `77 -t�L
-7-
r, Permit CC�ers work to Oe Clone On private pro,nerty ONLY.
Am, construction on Ine public domAln jidew?lks�
M;rAUeoS. eIC ) will "�U,,e 5epa,al , permission.
Penmit APP41collon: 180 Days
Pennit Limit: I year . Provided Work �s Started %I/Ithin 18C Dayi
Applicant. on of rfl, G, he, 1p..sl. heirs. assigns and
ccessofs in interest. agrees, to ;.n0emnIfy, Defend andChOld
hniless Inc City of Edmonds, VVashIAgto.1,,rtsao1IiiaIs,
emloyeits. and adents-from any and a!' claims of maq 3 0
whatever liature. arising dtrectlY of indirectly from me issuance
o! triis permit. Issuance 01 this perm It sha;lrtct be deemed to
c ,od;:,, Wa . " or reduce anY (UQuIrcmcdt 0 ny ci'y o�dlnance
CIjj,s jbj;Ity to enforce a y c, dinance
"n, i I" any way 1, n
J��LLRIN(�IOAO DAILL)
1, 11 � .0 Ll A I L 'y
ADII 1.
$EPA REVIEW
COMPLETE � E�EMPT
SIGN
ALL OWED
IREA
PROPOSEV.
�Lt OWED
PROPOSED
X,
I
2,
�OT COVEILAGE
ALLOW,-O "NO110SCU,
RCO OEO SETEIA�iC5 If I.)
nO.NT SID E EAR
'D SLTBACKS (FT
FrJOPOS�
FP01.1 L;P.510C PEAR
'y'
.`77 — it/
F 0 co
iF I V
SPECIAL NsPLCoA E.
PEOUIRE� LOAD
CJ YES dc""'T.
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER USC 108
FINAL INSPECTIOW REQUIRED
PLAN CHECK FEE
-an-,ET
BUILDINC
PLUMBING
ow
-7
1,
MCCHANICAL
GRADINGIFILL
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
ENG, INSPECT ION FEE
ocv
PLAN H1 CK DEPOSIT
TCTAL ANOUNT DUE
ATTENTION
APPLICATION. APPROVA L
This' applicof,un is not a per 71 1 until
c"', E
signed by the Building CNICiAl or IT s/t)qf
WoR, 'ol L I,
Deputy: and fr,et; Are 1101d. and rmo,Dt %
ocinowiMpod in splice provided
CITY Or
5D-Y.CNDS
CALL FOR -El. 0, / .
ATTENT E INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWrUL TO USE 04 OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCIUR P
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS 13EEN -ADE AND APPROVAL 0 771-0220 ORIGI14ALI F,!,? �ELLOW — ;A�VeCtOf
UPXNCY HAS 8FEN CRANTED. UBC
1, rEcITIFICATE OF OCC PINK WILD — Altt'�!401
�CTION 109
—12
417
.0
7
0
USE
CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE PERMIT
NUMBER q7 08
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATIO
JOB
2:1TEI/APT #1
OWNE�R NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS 1,?
LAo-acrixo R-D LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHlfC_ �UBDIVISION NO. LID NO.
,ILING ADDRESS
1P, .0,r-'L PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP,
CITY ZIP TELEPH NE NUMBER tEXISTING R I EQUIRED DEDICATION
`�VCV-N01- 1:)'S -4 -4
taA
NAME P
PROPOSED
M T
-_5 co SN� -5xy '125F_4Xf`4\ ETER SIZE LINE SIZE
ADDRESS -
SIE NUMBER
- 4?00 0
I Ali Tsb G I
6\,< :� 0 12
IICTFY i 1z, ZIP I TELEPHON E-N UMBER
LICENSE
ption d7f-Property - include all
n
Property
Tax Account -0o -5 - 0 02- - 0607
Parcel No.
NEW RESIDENTIAL PLUIMBINGFMECH
rV9 COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION COMMERCIAL CHANGE OF USE
WREMODEL APT.BLDG.
SIGN
GRADING FENCE
1:1 E]
REPAIR CIDS. x _FT)
DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL
INSERT HOT TUB/SPA
GARAGE RETAINING WALL/
C ROCKERY RENEWAL
Z
0-
(TYPE OF USE; BUSINESS*OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
rL
'OF
NUMBER
NUMBER
CRITICAL
0
OF
DWELLING
AREAS
[NUMBER
W
91
STORIES
UNITS
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN) .
�,� 0
V
'ERING MEMO DATED
- 12 .. '9 _I
TESCP Approved
0
RW Permit Required
0
Street Use Permit Req'd
0
Inspection Required
1911
Sidewalk Required
PRV REQUIRED
YES 11 NO 13
A
VARIANCE OR CU
ADB 0
SHORELINE 0
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA
HEIGHT
COMPLETE EXEMPT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
EXP /I <
I
Z: 27. � i
I
LOT ERAGE
REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.)
PROPOSED SETBACKS (F1
ALLOWED PROPOSED
FRONT SIDE REAR
FRONT UR SIDE REAR
3
I
`7
LOT AREA
LAINNII��EVIEW BY
DATE
71� 01-77
C , hl
-.f-
L-j'01 _Irv, fa�-
S�/,'1451
BY ITYPE OF
SPECIAL INSPECTOR REA
REQUIRED. IC)15
_*�. 11 0 YES L 4
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108
I f1j.;,j c- I I
FINAL I
1A4Q I' I a'� yd." ocke.-I
PLAN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
HEAT SOURCE:
GLAZING
0/6
112,
PLUMBING
-
Plan deck No. /1-1
q 7 2,:::�U
MECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
Any Construction on the public domain (curts, sidewplks,
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
GRADINGIFILL
STATE SURCHARGE
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work1s Started Within 180 Days
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and
successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold -
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance
of this permit. Issuance of this.permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision."
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I hereb- acknowledne that I have read this a nlicati-n that the
REQUIRED
VALUATION
OCCUPANT
LOAD
ij , n -kA- 141
60�
information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or i the duly.
ATTENTION
0010cATION"A00ROVAL
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comoly�'with city and
state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz-
THIS PERMIT
AUTHORIZES
is not a permit until
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
ONLY THE
signed 6y'the Building Official or his/her
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa-
WORK NOTED
Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is
tion Insurance aria RCW 18.27.
INSPECTION
acknowledged in space provided.
SIGNATURE IOWNER OR AGENT) DATE SIG ED
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF
OFF C!IAL'S SIGN W h DATE
EDMONDS
rARE
ATTENTION""
CALL FOR
RELEASED BY: 9ATE
. .
INSPECTION
I
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING 0 R STRUCT U RE
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR
.A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, USC
771=0220
ORIGINAL! " File YELLOW — I . nspector
SECTION 109
IMAT
PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor
fF-,t- tA::)
Lu 00
uj
CC 0
EXIST. TIM
-I
PLANTING
ARE A
- I
b4. �'t PROPERTY LINE EXISTING WOOD FEN
CONCRETE BULKHEAD
EXIST. DECK
S�
BULKHEAD //'EXIS ING
COD /t,A�A16E 1/'
7 , IX
uj
jRtMbD'LE
s G
.2
cc
uj
a. A D TORY '
0 EXISTING
LIJ ED
PROPOS
SPORT COURT I I uj 0
: . F-
(PATIO) 2 - STORY <
i
ADDITION he
he
5L'. 109 "1 0
<
EXI T. PORCH
CONC. WALK
EXIST. ROCKERY
I
EXIST. ASPHALT
DRIVEWAY
PROPERTY LINE
EXIST.
ROCKERIJ
10--
rz,
ILI
IS FRAME IS LESSCLEAR THAN
No rICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN TH
0 GUAILITY OF THE DOOMENT.
qits NOTI�E IT.IS DUE TO' THE.
;T-0
CITY 'COPY
ppopFRTY LINE
0
Co.
1,71
z
kN\
0
+/
E s c
I T. DE K
rp
FK
�j
PLANNING DATA"
NAME:
SITE ADDRESS: )51D 3 5a,.19,IJ DATE: -7
4W
ZONING. PLANCHK#: �7-2,4/Z
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addr-&,_, / �_ / -
CORNERLOT (Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 2,�_ Left Side: /D Right Side: (0 Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Front: 6� / Left Side: 67' Right Side: 36 Rear:
Street map checked for additionil setback required? &,
—(Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND.USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE: �? Z/
Maximum Allowed: 35 —Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT -
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:
Datum Point: (11444 (!;>"4t, Datum Elevation:
A.D.U. CREATED?:
SUBDIVISION: —
CRITICAL AREAS #: 91-1
SEPA DETERMINATION: i�- )Itf 19-T,
LOT AREA- 073
OTHER:
Plan Review By:—
M11-11
46
cAfi1es\permit\-p1mdaLdoc
if
ess e
.0��.entire site-.,Iri�..,
�4 L 1� J�I;
- Te66
fical4is of M
P.
site eiall
Rolling- -:,slope� on I thah15% (,a
horizontal distance of 6&feet).
Hilly�'- -slop'
es present bi�iW%f more 15% �and i 30
(a iiel�i&l
rise of 1la-feet over a"horizorital tance
dis of 33 to 66-feet).
4j_
f
.�jSteep.,-��,�gi�des,o greater presen on'site a verti of iio4iA
rise
over,,t-,,,
-a hor=on k��o t
han
Oth&'(jAez6q de��b�).
"C
6. Sitecofihdris iiezis of.ye�ar7round
pprq_�_-� �epft
standin pprq�, ep
gwatei,� ��*, %'; �
Site contains areasof.seasonal ':D'-
A
'IR4
771
;-,..What s6ison(�)�-bfihe'
W �K
N
& - Site,,, is in the flodwi�. hiin #�WJ6
A'k
p
9. Site.contains a creek -or an area *heriwater flows acro'st the grounds surfa
year-round? Fl�ws are seasonal? O&Tha t time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested .;meadow
;shrubs. n-dxed
urbin lafids'cape d� (lawnshrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is preseint on sitei
a
"N'
. ... ...... ..
1/97
K�
It ,
ft
%n* "'ka W
- WAR X,
, -!,. �, �Rtwlw � i
d6al Areair'g'
.7fie Cril the
on this form is to be filled
person preparing a Developxn6ht P V'
Application for.the City.of Edni6n&�J_.:,
prior to his/her subrnittal of a. necdssiiyto�6mpleteAdevddpn'.Tmi
to
development permi the Q t y.-: T
Perin
f
-The purpose of the Checklist is to enable Z; With a,signed copybft ormthip,
City staff't'6"d'e't:e'r*'m'*in'e'w'h�.�.'& should also,'.�ubmit
any i.,; applicaht
map or plot -plan- for individual lo'ts,of
Potential Critical Areas are or may be
-with 'hd i ffiLt1iAf`Ci_-ty,'
-present on the subject property., -The -the
parcel �enqug e
fi6d d id
information needed to complete the7 an e1iti0.the:*'Mect�Y_z--
can
Checklist should be easily availab�eev,`t, (A.Inaddifli th ...... ... .
on, . e 4pp cant,,,'
fromPbservations of the site.or4ata -Mirw1iidelother-pertin, "a
ShA
aviilabli�at`�City,Hall (Critkk�Areas-.,.., Y. information 6ito
to
Mven nes, r --Map, co iq��;ti esmco,
ion.
napq, or so . . V " : 4 .. - , , '.7. ,
�iwvk� rUw
-'wif this, Checklist to ass t s f
Anapplicant, or--his/.her,Xepr4!smtati-�ei',�-,,.--l�f '1-,_,,,cQm0letirtg theirprelimin
must fill out the checklist, sign and date
assessment of the� iite�
s
4.1 4,_
I have completed the attached Cmtical Area Checklist and attest that the answers
provided are factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column,
below).
Owner/ Applicant:
Name*
`A�pli6nt Representative:
Name
��. I . -1-_j , . - t , �. - . - .. - . . I I .
(A
a -C-3 Pla V I (f _C-JJ
tK 11
Street Address
Street Address r
�-n ..;-i
4*70
:'A
City, State, ZIP, v %;Thone�,,-,�.�, City, S��P, 23P
one
4.
sit
!A
L11
77 7-
LEQAI rwliOn Of PFQpCr!V,- hclLde at eafsements
z
z
UJI
A
�U,
ILL:
;L
P.- I N o.
tqy%.L�
Pimi.)MBINCIMECH
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANG E OF USE
L
ILL
Af'T fi)-I)G S,o,
FENCE
GFACI- "o,
--Fl)
.Z
INS101", "ja'SPA
C,1R, -,GC RETAINI.Nd q 5-c6a!5�
'WAL0
L ROCKE;.iY PiRNEWAL
Lij
P
9 (Iylll� I. U�(l AC, iVi I �) EV'LAIN'
Nusm.j
0,
Z�
1,4umriLN Or ,L
1 Q��.,
I LJ 'ILI
-CESCRIBE WORK TC BE DoNg T�GH PLOT,PLAN),
ILL 0
r-. u-,t
z
C
Plan.Check No.
This P-rit covers.worR to be cone,bri priate property ONL�.
Any construct ' on 66- the public domain (cur,,s, Side.valks.
drivewIyS. M;,rQueeS, 21C.),wili rewre C,303rale �ermjssion.
Pen -nit Application: 180 Days
11 It Limit 1 Year - Novided Work is Started Within 180 Day*
PUSLJC.PIG�T CF WAY PER OFFICIAL SIPEIET. MAP
J)PAP-,-
[1 "'0 0
q
tF,
. ILO
SIGN AREA SEPA RIEV�EW
PROPOSED COMPLETE y
�LLOWE 0 'E.PT
:40
VARIANCE OR CU
P--ANN:NG,PEVIEW
By'. CA . lir
SETRA CKS -FEET�� liEicaT:
F.ONTt SIDE, ACA9
LOT. GO I-EFA3(
PI
,CHECKED )BY T"!Z OF CON-,1RUC,7,IQN,
to
DE
G110"
IA.
A
I �I�CLPANT
REMAJIKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108
FINAL INSPECTION REQUIPED
PLAIN CHECK FEE
BUILDING
24.
PLUMBING
ME CHANICAL
GnAOINGiF(I-L
STATE SU-CHA.1�
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
ADDican:.. on Denali Of h,S 61 ner SPC-5e,
successofs in rilerest, a r greos to Indemnify, deftnd �ndhold
71
Ma"'flens the Cii� of Edmonds -'J,1sr1in9t0n ts� officials,
agen:s l'oni any and �;l cla'mS'!Cr da-�IagLS b!
-hate�er naiure. 11;31110 G,recuy or indirec fly from the issuance
PLAN CIIECI OEPOSIT
C! !hIr 1511i;-�o pf !hi�, hermit s�,;,!! rrCI be deer"ed to
I, Ornfv, —,,ve 6, reduce any jcQui,ement of any city ordinanc
2 2J
rr, jy.j" 3n.i,ty �, —frycP :.y oreinance
T07AL DUE,
41*
manno�
I n,vet,,y icirinwIndod that I have read this Apolicatim that 1110
ATTENTION
APPLICATION APPR.CVAL
and 111,11 1 111 thil. Owner. or the duly
�wher, I Ad, cc to Comly W , f1h Cl'y and
aulhofi.'ed agent 0: !he C,
and " doi,,; the work alllhori,.
'T.,z
This application is n0t.a vdimil'unlit
e I ri, 5 regula!'n'q CC"51'Ucli-1�1
Of,0 1,--(
stgned.by the Buildmo OtfICIAl-or h[s!hI
lt'Oh Of the Labor
tl lherct�,v, no berson will be 0rhDICYCd)n-VIOI,
vo—, NO!(O
Deputy, Antj ICOS AtO r'Ald, And receint is
Code 01 1" State 0 I Wrishinqlon rpialing JoVioritmen's Compensa.
acknowledgeo in
t to rr
JF":
41
CITY . I C I )F
47
('AELF-Sto
CALL ron
Dy
TTENTION
INSPECI 1014
IT IS I)Nt� �-611 A flUllrOING 00. STPUCTUPE
-N MADE AND APPROVAL OR
UN'11. A PINAL INSPECTION HAS BEE
77 1-0220,
-ORIC-11NAL — rile YELLO�V— fnseciw
A CERTIFICATE 05 OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED, UDC
SUCI ION 109
PINK — O,� OOtLr — Assess or
CITY OF EDMONDS
USE PERMIT
ZONE NUMBER S0635"
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
ce SUITE -APT is
ADDRESS
OWNER NAME NAME OF BUSINESS
John T & Karen A Launceford
)N CHECK
SUBDIVISION NO
LID NO
uj
MAILING ADDRESS
18703 Sound'View Place
11
0
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Permit Required 0
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE NUMBER
Edmonds 98020
206 774-4538
EXISTING — REOUIRED DEDICATION —
Street Use Permit Req'd 0
PROPOSED
Inspection Required 0
Sidewalk Required 0
a:
W
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
NO. OF FIXTURES
PRV REOUIRED
0
ui
YES 0 NO 0
0
ADDRESS
REMARKS
9
a:
cl:
W
Z
CITY Z'�_7
PHONE NUMBER
W
NAME
K.H.B. Construction Company
ADDRESS
cc
ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY
0
�_
7720 46th Place West
U
<
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE NUMBER
FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEW ED BY
Z
Mukllteo 98275 1206
355-9083
0
5
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
SIGN AREA
ALLOWED PROPOSED
SEPA REVIEW
COMPLETE EXEMP T
ADB N,9....
44
KHBCOCI17�13T 1/19/06
LegaiDescription of Property - include all easements
Z
0
Lots 2 & 3 and all that portion of lots
SHORE N
r-
LL
EXP 1,,4
A/,
11 & 12 lying westerly of paved highway
VARIANCE U
PLAN G R E BY
IxT k
/ i
cr
L)
except the northeasterly 75 ft of lots
W
0
AA
rw�
& 12 n Block C, Edmonds Sea View Trac
SETBACKS�-�EET
ts /,�. -
W 1�'
HEIGHT LOT
COVE��,
_..
.;7
d
Z
Z
_j
<
according to Plat recorded In Vol '
Properlypage 76, Snohomish County
TZ �
FRON SIDE REAR
EMARKS
Tax Acco nt 4346-0
Parcel No. 03-002-0007
FINEW RESIDENTIAL E] PLUMBING
COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL
El
MREMODEL APT.BLDG.
SIGN
CHECKED BY
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
I
CODE
OCCUPANT
GROUP_:2�
GRADING FENCE
I
REPAIR CYDS. x _FT)
A�
WOODSTOVE SWIM POOL
DEMOLISH INSERT HOT TUB/SPA
SPECIAL INSPECTOR
AREA
OCCUPANT
REQUIRED 13YES
LOAD
E] GARAGE RETAINING WALL/
RENEWAL
EMARKS
CARPORT ROCKERY
Z
0
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305
(TYPEOF SE. BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
ir-
Reusidential Single Family
_j
5
to
NUMBER
NUMBER OF CRITICAL
0
W
0
OF
DWELLING AREAS t"air
00
0
STORIES
UNITS NUMBER
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
FINAL INSPECTION REOUIRED
Change window to slider (2) and add
balcony deck above existing deck
VALUATION
PLAN CHECK FEE
4FEE
BUILDING
—7
HEAT SOURCE:
GLAZING
IN)
nATURAL GAS
PLUMBING
Plan Check No.
MECHANICAL
GRADINGIFILL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY.
Any c.onstruction on the public domain (curbs, sidewpiks,
:7 &
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission.
STATE SURCHARGE
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: I Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
ENG. INSPECTION FEE
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and
successors in interest, agrees to indemnity, defend and hold
24
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials,
m
employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
whatever nature, arising directly or Indirectly from the Issuance
of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
0
modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
X
nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
provision."
I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL
information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly
authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT This application is not a permit until
state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES signed by the Building Official or his/her
THE
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY
WORK NOTED Deputy: and fees are paid, and receipt is
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa-
acknowledged in space provided.
tion Insurance and RCW 16-27--, INSPECTION
RE tOWNER OR GENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT
OR4 OFFICIAL'S SIGNATU�v DATE
CITY OF
EDMONDS
Z
CALL J04 RE LEA.S BY: DATE
_�Y
NTION)
ATTd INSPECTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCU A UILDING OR STRUCTURE
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BE�MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. USC
CHAPTER 3. PINK — Owrer GOLD — Assessor
PER M17
CITY OF EDMONDS fNiUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERIVI�_T'APPLICATI.ON s
-E—L pLsr.
0
w
E115711c'_'
3K' f
SED . 0
oFO
Is NO 0,
-7 t:
4
z
0 )ATIA"
Si�� �ACA SEPA PC VE� ,oB ;�o
2- . , I�Ellli; .
ALLOWED P�OPOSED. CO-.,-,L ETC,
L eja; t� it C i 1) 11 _-�;i f P: I opco.; all oa-c'p-S.-
Ly 1I� 4
0 4
i7l Tj V.PIA.CE OR CU
CIL)
SETQ.%rKS'-.
%
-.CAP 4
�4i7, �1-1'1416 CQ,�.j
"A
4i3q,(,-003w- C
El
Ell,
7
A'Fll ULD0.
OPAIll'o CINECKED By
7 FENCE
__7_FT)
"P, 0, CONE'E""C',
WOOoSTOVE Sf(ECIAL INSPECTOR OCCUIPANI+
Flit. INSERT Ll REQUIRED LOAD.
ES
RCIAINI�C, WALE/
C1, U111 ROCKERY El E11NCWAL- AEMAR.5
z 'PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC.305 7.
.,L;;.v;l ) LIPLAIN. 7—
.,j!ALir.n Ov
0 CULI J0
El 1` I� -1
!C
oE,Cn,n_�'wCP'.0I1E nl)NE fATJACI4 PLOT, PLAN)
FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED
-Ty. Hi 5 (A L PLVrt I-L'
PLAN CHECK FEE
gUILDING
I A I I
GLA7:lX.
PI.U.BING'
�MECHANICAL
Plan Check NO
done on private pr on erty.0 N LY.- GRAD(NIGfFILL j
Any construction on the public domai�,(CUrt�, Sldewr,ll,�,
es, etc.)*will require separate permission. 'it S
driveways. marque STA+ URCHARGE
Permit Application: 180 Days
Proyided Work Is Sitarted WIt . hin ISO Days a
Permit Linfll* I yea, -
ENCd!1:_-P T I
CC ON F E
01 Or?haif of his or he� spouse, heirs. assigns and
�UCCeSSO,S in inte.IeSt, agrees to indeni,,,ily. defend and hold
h, C,ly �I EjPno,d, Washington its officials,
from 'any an,� all claims for (4.arnaiges of
y cr�,�oyeos. anc agentn
,r,,,tc,er ar;�ing directly OT indirectly from the issuance
oi inis permit, issuance Of trliS PC71111t,tlha�i nc� be deemed to PLAN CHCCI DEPOSIT
nnoai!y, wai�,6 or reduce any requirement 6 any city ordinance
YJ lim;t in �n, Way the City S ability to enforce otnt, ord;nanCo TO�TAL AMOUNT, DUE,
I hereby acl,nowledgP that I have'rcad this application; thatthe ATTENT I 10 �A APPLICATION APPROVAL
he:owner. or the duly
information giv�n is correct� and'that I am.t
authorized agent of the owner., I agree, to comply with city and I 'IS PEP' 17 �hjs Application is not a rP,,;! un!;!
state laws regulating construction; and in doing the-brii aulhoriz- AuT '0 P , ` I S Official or his/her
iolati 0 n of the Lat:,c, ONLY' C signed,by the Building
ed thereby, no person will be.employed inv Won, 14OTED Depuly� And fees are paid, and oce,pt is
Code of trio State of Washington relating to Vorkmen's COMPCnSa-
ackno,�,ledg(ld in sprice provided.
W 18.27.
"C"L S 5'G"" It
SO
, t
TTENTION
INSPECTIO�
G OR STRUCTURE 771— . 022 Cto,
JT J1 UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDIN ORIGINAL F"; c YELLOV) ristle
UtjTIL AIFINALEINSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPRCVAL OR- 0
HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC
A CERT F!CAT OF OCCUPANCY PINK — 0,-,e, GOLD
CHAPTER 3
10287,
AOR
SHEET NO. OF-
CALCUI DATE
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE CL = ?'�z
-717�
J- Ll'
Iz
-21
s c) (I v Cui N-la-Cc-I
C"ONE
ITY OF EDW, DS.
C.&NISTRIUkTION P�RMJT,APPLICATIO
r
John T & Karen�A Lauric�?f�ord
P.
.
18703 Sbun'd V i�ev., -P I a6e ;' :,. I
A
'Es'C'
- .
ruilLic airl4i or V�A� PER O"TiCIAL �31�(ET V
-w Pi-11i
EdrnGn(fs 980'0- 'CC 774-45tS
EIIST,Nn 51,1 ji, P
"o,osco ........ 0
r—"Ou
qEv,!�
Cor�sfrljct i
7720 46th Plbce We f
c",
11 D
Ywk; I fec, ()P27r A 2Cr r) r)
KHBCOC I 1.72ET. �aLq.
f siuN AREA SEPA nQ11E,,
PnoPosco cOlAr"LE'
�L�OWED -E
ncludo o'! -,,ro,7� I 1
11
I
o
I �n
I
U
9
2 1 y I n 9. v�e s t er I o f P a �,l If i pwly
o:,cc-2 the, norli-c,�� I :, Ly f lot- 1,
VAqu�NCE
't- N c; R
12 in C,- Edmonds Se;3 Virw Trac,t s
PA FL� I
'fL
ord i ri(A to Pla recor- o F
r _' I " "t7 o p Uco'
sib,
7 C v.
",gl
I 1,�,
F �,)�,.rlwi)s(h
'1,011 ,r, C 7()0, _C 0 D
3
El"I
U�J
L rLUIVE)ING
P. CSIbENIIAL
cN,c.L
API IMIG
310N
GRAPING FE.CE
CHECKED BY
OF
�:ULI 11 AN
c 'Ds _FT)
!Z"Z
woo SV��M POOL
riv! 1OvL
Ns rull'up
,SPECIAL P45 PlEclon
A; EA
REOUIPED
0 Yrt;
,o-u
�ICTANNO WALL/
OCKEM RENEWAL
REMARKS
PROGRESS�INSPECTMNS PER U8,C 305
0
(jyPCUt
Re'sidential 55jin le Farl ly
I
of
An
NU
DESC;P,HE wORK 70 PF DONE jAT TACH PLOT PLAN)
ange,winclow to Ell i dei- (2l and" ).Od
F114AL INSFIECTION REOUIRED
b -�Iccny decl, abr,v- I i [2, d EtEk'
z
PLAN CHECK
BUILDING
A
GLAZING
--DAIURAI GAS --
PLUMBINr
Plan Check NO.
VECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done -on private property ONLY.
GRADINGIFICL
Any CorltrUttion on the public domain (curtt..sidevvilWs,
(f nwayS, Marriu�oS'�Ir rerju; s�oirate v6i�missio.n
ST�TE SVRS,�E
Pe"It ApplIcaflow 180 Days�
DRMNAr C FEE
Permit Llmit' i,)i6r - Provided Work is SfAhed.Wlthn 1M Days.
STORM
Arplirat _or� benalf I.hiti Or. 11.121,15DOUse, he i, gns and
ENG. "PECTiciij FEE
e Eats to indernnify. des e-nadSsa'nd hold
successor� in.mter st, ag,
Zrmless Ihe City '451 Edmohds, �Washing!on, its oflicials�
emOOyee S ark agents front any and all claims for damages of
i
rT
,
atevernalu'-e. ar, ising directly or indirectly fro- the issuanne
nf this permli. Iss arce of !his permit sha:l no, le deemed to
PLAN Cil(�Ck nEPESIT
modify. waivec, re dLCE any requirement o any city ordinance
A
rcr lirn,t in'anv way the City's at)ility to en , price any o r dirance
TOTAL AKjCUNT D U E
provision
I herebyac'Knowledge that I I,ave read this apipliCation� that the
AfTENTIPN
APPLICATION. APPROVAL
information giver, is correct: and that I am the o. Per , or the duly
aulhorizecl ag.�nt of the owner. I agTeC to comply with city and
PE17' .
. -,Of a De
This apptiCa:10n is � mil until
state laws regulating construction: and in doing Me work authoriz.
CC
signed by the Buil�i�ig Official or his/her
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor
L"o
WORK I-OTED
and fees are paid, and receipt is
Ccde o f Ino Statet of washinoton relating to Workmen's Compensa.
tion Insurance and RCW
o
knowledged in sPaCe D,Olidcd
CR
"'n E , o" 'C' C'
CITY OF
EDIMC NDS,�*
4
INSPECTION J
7
N
T 10
A TION
IT IS UNLAWFUL T USE OR 0 IN G On STRUCTURE
UNL A F "U A
,��T UL USE if G"U
A I 1111111TION HAS BE AIDE
UNTIL A F�NA�FIN SPECTION HAS BE ADE AND APPROVAL OR'
F,le YELLOVJ — I'soeclo,
771 -�0220 cqjGIr4t-,'.
'A Y HAS BEEN GRANTED, UBC
�;ERTIF! CA, OF OCCUPANC
CHAPTER 3,
C,ne- GOLD —
7q..
r74 7
0�
F! �1.
14,e
stl1i
-0
A ,
44
v r
CE: ; IF T14E DOCUMENT. IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR:rHAN
NOTI ITY OF THE DOCUMENT,
0 THE, QUAL
IS'DUE T
0
r
r-o
p—
L'j
0 J,S j-) N YW
D Lva -.0
vo. --Au Oil, Ino lvo' 12;
X",
m ;- � - ! .. . .
mirt ivvml IN I "I'-'
-177 77
I PLAN FILE N1U1%MnR �iullzjiN-
Applicant Fill PERMIT 640281
ftemit Am
��B ildihq 1-ImAde,41eavy Lines
'NAM�
A -ME OR 1, OF BUSI ESS) JOB A.DDRE38
IrA
M.UL.ING A-DDREIA
W SID�; YAIU3 SLIT !�ACK REAJ-L YARD
T
.(,N F MAP NUNIBER VACANT SIT1,;
-7 T kl,/ C] YES LD No
9AME, 131JILDIN1, AREA.
LOT. A -Ft Ek VAJUA.NCE NUMBER
W, ADDRES8
ALL BUILDING'SETBXCK8
IIF
T To
NO' E EAvE LiNis
0'- 7, -
CITY TE1,El'ito NUMBER E RKS
1�w adz-
6-2 le
ADDR.Ess
Encronchnient, Permit P 'RhIlT NIJKBER, STREET GRADE CUECK1.6
ReqUired
Y%S
r 111401NE N No�
"T C , ICI., E CJEAAAXCI" CHZCXW. BY
C T UM 'FRV SIZ
METEIR SIZE
z
1-1 &TATE LI ENSE 10UMBER. LICZII�SE NUMB—IR =7
C�Ty
LOT, TfLACT
AM
j
/Y 0 /v S J, 154 14; c r-S
J
TYPIC CQNN,)t;CT1ON VF—,UFIED BY.
4
P PEILM
F11'X ZU14
E TYPX QF CON STREET IMPROVED
El YES C NO
UCCk*JPANCY 0 p
SPECIAP' I1CT(;R-1tE
NO
U PLAN Cl��ECXED 13Y
171 —,;URK To B 1,; �4
T,
6p-- BUILDING
VA
%TJATJO . N
13UIWIIII�G P�MXIT
N UMBER OF STORUIES 2 FEE
NEW 7
PLUINIBING
PERMIT FI—E
"i JIFAT & GAS LINE
LT —MR, PERMIT FEE
A RE N U�
ENTIAL UNITS
FFAIR NO -�RESJD— ��=O-LITION
r AM UE
WS, (0,
7
I hereby ackao.l�-Igd khat I h.fi eto -.his 0-pplIcAtIo.; tNt th, In.
formation 91yon is corrkt:'-ivi�d lh�t I hn� -t,44 owner, or the dqly author- 00 L I C rh 0.- N APP46VAL t
izecl agent of tho o,ncr. 4agvte to cornDly wfib city &nd mttite laws regu-
this �Lpp.IICRUOh is not a perMil. until.
IAtIoK construction: and in �QlnK the w�,tc authorlrod-th�"by. nn poreln AU'ViloRIZE$
will be employed In violatlow of the !,nbot C.6,!c of tne k3tate of Washington signed.by Lhe Director of Building In
wxi,v I-Ific
re.lating to Workm�n'a CompenLIMLIOn Insuran". WORTE NOTED AloH, or his deputy: andr fees ar PtUd"iz�c";
NOTE: PERW LIMIT ON8 YEAR i:c,ccl))t isa—cknoWledged, In space provided
( NA'I:j 4 I)ATE 'ED
1, t�L to t K AGE r) SIG $IQ IATU-J�t%
CITY -OF
HECK ;NRNV,� .7
ki
2AL
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds S11DE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS 0
-C) c) C)
2,2 9,�)
OWNER . ........ ... .....
'e
ADDRESS .........
3 0 u, Vw,
I
EASEMENT No . ..........................................
4-lb is/
AD
ICANTRACTOR . ..... ................... ..........
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . ............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................
NAME OF ADDTTTOX
R
T I
V-e,;, �e_r_j
Approved:
DATE ........
B -"�, "I".
...................
. . . .........................
CITY OF EDMONDS
Call PRospect 6
CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT 71107 w.he.p. work
is ready.. for, Inspectle n. No. I#skc-
tions Saturday, Sunday 0.r',h6.11days.) .1N2 2740
SIDE, SEWW'PERMIT
ADDRESS ............. 1a79a_S.Q.Un.d ... Ziem .. nace__.'"
.............................................................................................................................
OWNER ........ ....... JOS6Pb ... A....B.uchineier ........................... CONTRACTOR .......... Wnoley.'
s ... Pipe ... & ... Sewer .............
Permission is granted ........ Febru�� 2.0., 19 6 8 days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
. ...... .......... .. ........ for ........................
With City Sewers in accordance with apilication on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer Inside Property line. A licensed Side -Sewer Contractor must
be employed to construct side sewer in street area., Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
Nr No. 2—Obtain full Information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side
sewers when you get permit.
N, No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches InBide property line; minimum grade of 2
No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches In street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
Nr � No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is Provided for In the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its appu
tenances except to insert the pipe into the wye.
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - 425-771-0220 - FAX 425-771-0221
Website: www.d.edmonds.wa.us
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division
March 26, 2009
CG Engineering
250 4"' Ave, South
Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: Driveway Slope Waiver
Launceford Residence
18703 Soundview Place
Dear Mr. Chase,
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
1
I", MIN,
This letter is being sent in response to your request to exceed the maximum allowed
driveway slope of 14%. It is understood that due to a surveying error placing the foot of
the driveway 4ft higher than it's actual elevation, it was impossible to construct the
driveway per the originally approved plan. Therefore, a maximum slope of 19.5% will
be allowed in order to meet the existing grade of the garage as shown on the revised site
plan submitted.
Please call the Engineering Inspection line at 425-771-0220, ext. 1326, to schedule your
driveway form inspection, prior to pour. If you have any questions regarding these
requirements please feel free to contact JoAnne Zulauf at 425-771-0220, ext. 1324.
Thank you,
&40
ROBERT S. ENGLISH, P.E.
City Engineer
jz
cc:
street file
permit file #2007-0695
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH", RANGE 3"EAST, W.M.
REVISION ------
H A R I (b 't'u"
BUILDING DEPARTMEN'T
CITY OF EDMONDS
�col _oVT5_,_
-PIW qwoFl
4vi5lot
V/qLA
STREET FILE
SPECIAL
-4- DRIY-ZWAY GRADE NOTES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SURVEY STAKE GRADE
TO INSURE A!i DRIVEWAY SLOPES ARE LESS THEN
20.01 THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL APPROVE THE
SUBGRADE PRIOR TO FINAL PAVING. IF SLOPE
ISSUE ARISES' CG ENGINEERING SHALL BE
CONSULTED E EFORE CONSTRUCTION CAN PROCEED.
(EXISTING HOUSE)
I
uj
TRENCH
in
:z
C�
STAMAY LANDING PER
ARCHTECT CONTRACTOR
tiam
CONCRETE WALL
94--
CB#3 (CUZ-BURINGTON CB)
12' WE 2* COMPACTED STA 14�,U
00 DEP'l)i ASPHALT PAVEMENT /0 GRATE � 111SO5 (lb )
"o
_1
0 /(? IT - 111501
6,
EDGE DMW\
it
PAVEMENT
YOM 115.51)
NTH TEE
101.79
O+ODr
7'�
L 25 - :
-4 A7
it si. 17-5
,
IT.
EX 97.75
U68 V, 94.97
I ; 1, d.
19 5x
3t%
, ,
HIO
_l00%:,.
q
61
6.95
IWO 11670
II&5j
ENGINEIERIM
250 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 200
EDMONDS. WASHINGTDN 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 778-5536
'6'
0
m 5
GARAGE FLOOR
lim
1+5D
(D
GARAGE DOOR 7YP P=
Lj
CONNECT C TO ALL
NEW DOWNSPOUTS
<
DESIGN:
DRA
CHECK:
7 6%
JOB NO
DATE:
Ir Pvc
16.25
G, GUIZ
41
L
JPU
� JRP
R dMS
07215.20
0./2./07
IMPROVE Wmll��
94 AS NECESSARY
00
C�o 'L- TOP = IUD 0
.1 BOTM - 1010 1
L f ASPHALT
'06> �O \�- TOP - 11450
BOTTOM - 110.0
1115
TOP . 116.0-
DOSTING CYCLONE
BOTTOM 115.0 FENCE
INSTALL 12 LF - TRENCH
DRAIN PER DETAIL 3
INSTALL t 100 LF OF l.lYl!0NE
THICI(ENEID EDGE
DMG CYCLONE FENCE
D:Sw CYCLONE
BLOCK WALL OR IOU . TE,
FENCE
IV HIGH SEE DETAIL 2
z
GRADING & DRIVEWAY PLAN
SCALE. 1" 10'
z
0
1 _j
a 5 I'D
CL
BASE LEVELING PAD NOTES:
I THE LEVELING PAD IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
LLI
OF CRUSHED STONE.
2. THE BASE FOUNDATION IS TO BE APPROVED
FINISHED LEVEL OF COPICRM
SURROUND TO BE APPROX
Z CL
>
BY THE SITE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR
1/8- ABOVE TOP OF
Ld C14
TO PLACEMENT OF THE LEVELING PAD.
CHANNEL EDGE
0
GRADING QUANTITIES
TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) - 20 0 CU. YDS.
CDMPAC UNIT
0 5' MIN
DIPANSION MN T
00
LLJ cy)
TOTAL EMBANKMENT
INDTH 18*
-DEPTH-
ASP"AL T
>
(FILL) - 180.0 CU. YDS.
12*
INSTALL ACO DRAIN
TOTAL 200 CU. YDS.
mEiGHT: B'
OWIGHI: 85 LEIS
F 1/2.
MODEL KICOS OR EOUAL MIN
z 3::
THE CUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR THE PERMIT
0 0
PROCESS ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE DO NOT
ILL. (n
Z
USE FOR BIDDING. PAYMENT. OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES.
CONCRETE 300D PSI MIN
LLJ
L) INr) Z
z 0 0
UNIT FACE
BEIDDING LAYER
SLOPE CUT
!o 0
ILLI
-6' CRUSHED ROCK
6-
6-
LEVELING PAD
DIMENSIONS & WEIGHT WAY VARY BY REGION
/;N KEYSTONE WALL TO 4' HIGH K-,'\ TRENCH DRAIN (IN CONCRETE)
SCRT r
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE: DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR JBIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
SHEET:
A
C4.1
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5T H AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
*PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE*
STATUS: ISSUED ENG20080345
SIDE SEWER PERMIT (I -Single Family)
Permit Number: ENG20080345 Expiration Date: 12/4/2008
Job Address: 18703 SOUND VIEW PL, EDMONDS
'APPLICANT CONTRACTOR
JOHN & KAREN LAUNCEFORD MURPHY BUILDING COMPANY
21202 92ND PL W 6203 202ND ST SW
EDMONDS, WA 98020
LYNNWOOD, WA 98036
LICENSE #: MURPHBCI 13K3 EXP: 5/22/2010
•
•
JOB DESCRIPTION
IREPAIR P N I PROPOSE TO REUSE LATERAL LIDNUMBER-
GRINDER PUM N I PROPOSE TO REUSE SIDE SEWER
CONNECTION TO THE SEWER LATERAL
EASFAILNT INFORINIATION
•
PROIECT CROSSES OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY
•
I VERIFICATION OF RECORDED EASEMENTS COMPLETE
IArDEMATTY- The Applicant has signed an application which states helshe holds the City ofEdmonds harmlessfrom injuries,
damages or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may he made against the City ofEdmonds or
any ofits departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and
afforneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVAIION
CALL FOR INS PECTION (42 5) 771-0220 EXT. 1326
24 HOUR NOTICEREQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS
TIES APPLICATION IS NOT A PERNUTUNTIL SIGNED BY 114E CITY ENGINEER OR HISMERDEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED.
A A Printed: Thursday, September 04, 20(
F� FILE COPY N INSPECTOR COPY
DATE
F] APPLICANT COPY
0
STATUS: ISSUED
ENG20080345
• Construction hours are Monday -Friday 7am-6prn and Saturdays l0arn-6pm. No work on Sundays or Federal Holidays.
• Three feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, P.I.Ws, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts and valves shall
be maintained.
• Refer to City of Edmonds Side Sewer Infonnation handout for approved pipe materials, inspections and other requirements.
• Condition of the e)dsting lateral to be verified by the City's Public Works Dept. to obtain approval for reuse. Contact Edmonds
Sewer Division at 425-771-0235.
• E-Sanitary Side Sewer Inspection
• E-Engineering Final
PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL:
PARTIAL INSPECTION DATE: INITIAL:
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED DATE: INITIAL:
NOTES;
NOTES:
0
OF EDMONDS
5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020
HONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221
/1177 S-9
*PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOBSITE*
STATUS: ISSUED ENG20080345
SIDE SEWER PERMIT (I -Single Family)
Permit Number: ENG20080345 Expiration Ddte: 12/4/2008
Job Address: 18703 SOUND VIEW PL, EDMONDS
JOHN & KAREN LAUNCEFORD MURPHY BUILDING COMPANY
21202 92ND PL W 6203 202ND ST SW
EDMONDS, WA 98020 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036
LICENSE 4: MURPHBCI 13K3 EXP: 5/22/2010
•
•
JOB DESCRIPTION
IREPAIR P N PROPOSE TO REUSE LATERAL LIDNUMBER.
CRINDER PUM N PROPOSE TO REUSE SIDE SEWER
CONNECTION TO THE SEWER LATERAL
•
•
LAS EMENTINFORIMATION
PROJECT CROSSES OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY
VERIFICATIONOF RECORDED EASEMENTS COMPLETE
IADEMATTY- The Applicant has signed an application which states helshe holds the City ofEdmonds harmlessftom injuries,
damages or claims ofany kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City ofEdmonds or
any ofils departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including defense costs and
anorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
CALL DlAL-A-DIG (1 -800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION
CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326
24 HOUR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS
THISAPPLICATION IS NOT A PERMITUNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED.
Printed: Thursday. SeDtember 04, 20C
FILECOPY
F INSPECTORCOPY F APPUCANT COPY
0
STATUS: ISSUED
ENG20080345
• Construction hours are Monday -Friday 7arn-6prn and Saturdays l0arn-6pm No work on Sundays or Federal Holidays.
• Three feet of clearance around fire hydrant§, standpipes, P.I.Ws, manholes, water meters, blowoffs, cleanouts and valves shall
be maintained.
• Refer to City of Edmonds Side Sewer Information handout for approved pipe materials, inspections and other requirements.
• Condition of the e)dsting lateral to be verified by the City's Public Works Dept. to obtain approval for reuse. Contact Edrnonds
Sewer Div is ion at 425-771-0235.
• ESanitary Side Sewer Inspection
• B-Engineering Final
PARTIAL NSPEC71ON DATE: INITIAL: NOTES:
PARTIAL INSPEC710N DATE: INITIAL: NOTES:
FINAL INSPECrION APPROVED DATE: INITIAL:
2� 3 kzw
& Frdl i 101"
7/,V/�F� /--�
STATEMENT ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Property Address: 18703 Soundview Place
Edmonds, Washington
Legal Description: LOTS 2 AND 3 AND ALL THAT PORTION
OF LOTS I I AND 12, LYING WESTERLY OF PAVED HIGHWAY; EXCEPT
THE NORTHEASTERLY 75 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 12 IN BLOCK VICTI,
EDMONDS SEA VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED
IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 76, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
Assessor's Parcel Number: 00434600300200
I have read the requirements for accessory dwelling units contained in Chapter 20.21 of the
Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) and understand that an accessory dwelling
unit as defined in ECDC Section 21.05.015 is prohibited until an Accessory Dwelling Unit
Pen -nit is approved.
I also understand that an Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit cannot be approved unless all the
criteria in Chapter 20.2 1 are met, and all the necessary items are submitted, including an affidavit
of occupancy and a covenant to be filed with the Snohomish County regarding the regulations
imposed on Accessory Dwelling Units.
Property Owner Signature: c 2,ee.-t—
Property Owner Name (printed I
Date: ^1 Y '70 3 oos
STATE OF WASHINGTON
(// k
COUNTY OF
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thaL—)��L--
signed this instrument and acknowledge it to be his/her free and voluntary act for�the uses and
purposes mentioned in this instrument.
Notary's pressure seals must be smudged. Dated:
Signature of
Notary Pubji6-
2�1
Residing at: k C,1`1
#a* of wo"Oon My Appointme/t
L"TTE K WYATT Expires: C� od e`
My AppoW"*M Expfts Apr 29, 2010 1
RETAININJOALL SCHEDULE
WALL GEOMETRY
WALL REINFORCING
MAX. "H"
'T'
B.
"D"
"S" BARS
4'-0"
01-9.
11-0.
8'
lo"
#5 @ 15'
6'-0'
1'-0"
l'-4'
8"
10"
#5 @ 15-
8'-0'
l'-6"
2'-6"
8"
12"
#5 @ 9- EDGE
NOTES:
1. FOUNDATION SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED FILL.
2. THE 4' AND 6' RETAINING WALLS HAVE REINFORCEMENT CENTERED IN WALL.
ALTERNATE HOOK DIRECTION INTO FOOTING EVERY OTHER BAR.
3. 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH 6" OF 1" MINUS GRAVEL WASHED ROCK ALL
AROUND, WRAPPED IN NON —WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. SLOPE TO DRAIN AND TIE
TO CATCH BASIN IN NEW DRIVEWAY.
4. f'c = 2500 PSI
5. fy = 60 KSI I
STUD WALL PER
PLAN
FINISHED GRADE
PER ARCH.
WATER PROOFING
PER ARCH. DWGS.
BACKFILL W/ FREE
DRAINING MATERIAL
FTG. DRAIN
PER NOTE 3
cpo— 1, [�'
%0- \—(2)—#5 BARS
.0.010
CPO 0
co
0
.f
0.
#5 @ 15- 0. C.
IN.
M IN.
HORIZ.
21
uj
-2S" BARS :z
CLR. U.N.O.
U 0
60C
cl" .
ON.
OMPACTED
(ro
�Po C*
BACK FILL SLAB ON —GRADE
PER ARCH.
00
()PoO* (:Poc*
0 0 0
"s
X x
10
c
Q
c
0
#4 @ 15- O.0
TOP & BOT. O.C.
.t" "T" #5 @ 15
B" TOP & BOT.
GARAGE RETAINING WALL SECTION.
SCALE: 1/2" = l'-O"
STREET FILE
RESUB
0 2008
71�
ONG
T_yoFWA&VM
svy C#
0
__P 23
EXPIRES: 7/6 2008 L
LAUNCEFORD RESIDENCE RETAINING WALL$
DATE 06/27/08
DRAWING NO.
18703 SOUNDVIEW PL
PRIXIECT NO. 07215.22
0
FENGINGGERING
EDMONDS, WA 98020
SCALE 1/2' = V-D'
T"u GARAGE RETAINING WALL SECTION
250 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 200
DRAW Eff zos
ss-1
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
CHECKED BY WrM
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) -n8-5W6
APPRIMI) 13Y OCC
PLOT DATE: 6/27/08 FILE NAME: SS-I.&g
RETAINING AL SCHEDULE
WALL GEOMETRY MW
WALL REINFORCING
�Al.
H'
-D'
-T'
-8-
Y
"K-
-S- BARS
"F- BARS
4'-0"
0'— 10"
0'-5-
l'-5'
8-
0
#4 @ 12-
#4 @ 12-
6'-0"
l'-2"
l'-6"
2'— 10"
8 "
0
#5 @ 15"
#4 @ 15"
8'-0-
1 l'-2-
1 V-6-
1 2'-10'
1 8-
1 l'-6"
#5 @ 12"
#4 @ 12"
NOTES:
1. FOUNDATION MUST BE ON UNDISTURBED SOIL
2. BEARING CAPACITY = 4000 PSF
3. EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE 55 PCF (NO SURCHARGE)
4. CONCRETE STRENGTH f'c = 2500 PSI
5. STEEL REINFORCING fy = 60 KSI
1 6. POUR KEY NEAT AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH
TOP OF WALL
(2)—#5 CONT.
#5 @ 15- O.0
CONT., HORIZ
"S" BARS
.10
1 1/2 WITH FREE
uj
2"0 PVC WEEP
,,,—BACKFILL
CLR. DRAINING MATERIAL
HOLES @ 6'-0" O.C. W1
Zc-
1/4- SQ. GALV. WIRE
1--
UJI
MESH, TYP.
MIN.
0
FINISHED GRADE
o Lu
2=2�
PER ARCH.
j <
Noo
\1 1�
STD.
1 #4 @ 15" O.C.
z [ 11-0.
"T' T--t7l
4
'---"F" BARS
#4 @ 12- O.C.
"S" BARS
SHEAR KEY
PER SCHED.
SEE NOTE 6
.B.
SITE RETAINING WALL SECTION
SCALE: 1/2" = l'-O"
STREET FILE
0
vy C'�t 4qll
& WA.94
LAUNCEFORD RESIDENCE RETAINING WALL$
DATE 06/27/08
DRAWING NO.
.4M
18703 SOUNDVIEW PL
PROJECT NO. 07215.22
0
GINIGIN&RING
EDMONDS, WA 98020
SCALE 1/2* = l'-O*
DRAWN BY zos
SS-2
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
'Tu SITE RETAINING WALL SECTION
CHECKED BY WTM
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-85W
APPROVED BY CCC
FAX (425) 778-5536
1
1
1
PLOT DATE: 6/27/08 FILE NAME: SS—ldg
JUN Z 2u
StJRVEY EXHIBIT
DEV'MW T UW6 CM
S7 R
ASSU E
�7
SOUND IEW PL
Q,
NJ9*28'01"'E
F:OUND7CON,5 MON 124.00"
/N CASE WINAIL -D F
SHE F
'(VISITED 5107) EL=99.66
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 13
11,01 1,10,
LOTS 2 AND J AND ALL THAT
PORTION OF LOTS 11 AND 12
LYING WESTERLY OF PAVED HIGHWAY,
EXCEPT THE NORTHEA S TERL Y 75
FEET OF LOTS -3 AND 1.2 IN BLOCK
-C- EDA40NDS S&4 VIEW' TR4CTS,
MAW LEVEL
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, 2ND FLOOR FF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, EL 119. 08
PAGE 76, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH
COUNTY WASHINGTON.
LEGEND: GARAGE FF
EL= 116.81
0 FOUND .,REBAR LS14561, AS SHOWN
EIP EDGE OF PAVEMENT 13 ro vol
0 EL= 125.98 vo.1 A A6.93 - �-5 30
E EL= 129.69
E EL = 129.60 0
A
A
0 EL=lJO.47.
--w
.11 0
SCALE-. 1'� 50"
EXHIBIT PREPARED FOR.'.
KARIN AND JOHN LAUNCEFORD
'V.
DRAWN BY- JRL
W4
FILE NAME: LAUNK�-01A.DWG,
EC, I CRONES & ASSOC.
N
LAND SURVEYORS
F" (4,' 4.J2-,W.0
2-V06 190TH Ar 'SE KENT, WA 98042 (42:5) 432-5950
SHEET. -1 OF2 DATE SIGNED: .5-1ki-67
lie -E
i - f
STO
Supplement to Storm Water
Infiltration Report
FOR
Launceford Residence Addition
18703 Soundview Place
Edmonds, WA, 98020
fED BY
ENGINEERING
In
CG Engineering Project No. 07215.20
Supplement to Report dated: June 25, 2008
March 24, 2009
ENGINEERING
250 4h Avenue S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 778-8500
ESTR"'EET FILE
REVISIC)N
MAR 2 4 2009
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDMONDS
PROJECT SCOPE
= C M
r=r,GirAcEmNG
The grades at the bottom of the existing driveway for the Launceford Residence project
located at 18703 Soundview Place in Edmonds, WA were significantly lower in elevation
than the original survey indicated.
The goal was to have a relatively flat surface at the top of the driveway. During
construction, it became apparent that the driveway would need to be steeper than
originally thought. The project has been modified so that the entire driveway will be new,
and will have a slope that becomes as steep as 19.5%. The issue of slope is being
addressed via an exemption waiver submitted to JoAnne Zulauf at the City of Edmofids.
Because the entire driveway is being redone, it is necessary to verify that the infiltration
trench built for the original site is adequate enough to service the impervious areas on the
property.
Per the contractor, the as built size of the trench is 58' long x 5' wide x 2' deep. The
capacity of the trench is 182 ft3 , as shown in the attached calculation. Using the HYD
program, the capacity of the trench was determined to be 0. 16 acres, or 6,970 square feet.
An area calculation spreadsheet has been included that shows the as built trench is large
enough to successfully infiltrate all of the runoff.
The sport court was determined to have been built prior to 1977 and has not been
included in the "new" impervious areas, as it previously was. An email from the previous
owner verifying this has been attached.
Attachments:
As Built Trench Capacity
HYD.program calculation
Impervious Area Map
Existing Conditions Correspondence
Storm Water Infiltration Report for Launceford Residence — Project #07215.20 Page 2
S�Z-E7 ),PER A'S'PCL)1L--F
OF
03 E5)4 2-) t (0 1115 + 2-S
�f:T
x
F T 4T
A<�
0. 15- �6r4 f
0. 17 Fr�
C)'0y;- 4ikcere"�Ce cno'-\
-s i
p-Cre5_ IU' a A.
Description By Date
--A5—RvIL!D7 T—M(A—CAPAC i—
Checked Date
ENGINiERING
250 4th Ave. South Scale Sheet No.
Suite 200 Project LN Job No.
Edmonds, WA 98020
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
surface water management DiVision
HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS
version 4.21B
1
- INFO ON THIS PROGRAM
2
- SBUHYD
3
- MODIFIED SBUHYD
4
- ROUTE
5
- ROUTE2
6
- ADDHYD
7
- BASEFLOW
8
7 PLOTHYD
9
- DATA
10
- RDFAC
11
- RETURN TO DOS
ENTER OPTION:
2
SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH
STORM OPTIONS:
1 - S.C.S. TYPE-lA
2 - 7-DAY DESIGN STORM
3 - STORM DATA FILE
SPECIFY STORM OPTION:
S.C.S. TYPE-lA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION
ENTER: FREQ(YEAR), DURATION(HOUR), PRECIP(INCHES)
100,24,3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION
100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM **** 3.00" TOTAL PRECIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO.
0,85,.16,98,5
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
.2 .0 85.0 .2 98.0 5.0
PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.12 7.67 1607
ENTER [d:](path]filename[.eXt] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
100dev
FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ?
y
SPECIFY: C - CONTINUE, N - NEWSTORM, P - PRINT, S - STOP
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
surface water management DiVision
HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS
version 4.21B
1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM
2 - SBUHYD
3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD
4 - ROUTE
5 - ROUTE2
6 - ADDHYD
7 - BASEFLOW
8 - PLOTHYD
9 - DATA
10 - RDFAC
11 - RETURN TO DOS
ENTER OPTION:
10
R/D FACILITY DESIGN ROUTINE
SPECIFY TYPE OF R/D FACILITY:
1 - POND 4 - INFILTRATION POND
2 - TANK 5 - INFILTRATION TANK
3 - VAULT 6 - GRAVEL TRENCH/BED
6
ENTER: EFFECTIVE STORAGE DEPTH(ft) BEFORE OVERFLOW
2
ENTER: VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in)
11
ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] OF PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW HYDROGRAPH:
100dev
PRIMARY DESIGN INFLOW PEAK .12 CFS
ENTER PRIMARY DESIGN RELEASE RATE(CfS):
0
ENTER NUMBER OF INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS TO BE TESTED FOR PERFORMANCE (5 MAXIMUM):
1
ENTER Cd:][path]filename[.ext] OF HYDROGRAPH 1:
100dev
ENTER TARGET RELEASE RATE(CfS):
0
ENTER: NUMBER OF ORIFICES, kISER-HEAD(ft),
0,2,12
RISER OVERFLOW DEPTH FOR PRIMARY PEAK INFLOW
SPECIFY ITERATION DISPLAY: Y - YES, N - NO
n
RISER-DIAMETER(in)
SPECIFY: R - REVIEW/REVISE INPUT, C - CONTINUE
r
SUMMARY OF INPUT ITEMS
1) TYPE OF FACILITY: GRAVEL TRENCH/BED
2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 2.00
3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): 11.00
4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH rILENAME: 100dev
5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(CfS): .00
.05 FT
6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 1
TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: 100dev TARGET RELEASE(CfS):
7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 0,. 2.00,
8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO
WITS]
12
ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED):
0
INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 1590 CU-FT
PERFORMANCE:
INFLOW
TARGET -OUTFLOW
ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE
STORAGE
DESIGN HYD:
.12
.00
1.99
172
TEST HYD 1:
.12
.00
.00 1.80
170
SPECIFY: D -
DOCUMENT,
R - REVISE, A -
ADJUST ORIF, E - ENLARGE,
S - STOP
d
PERFORMANCE:
INFLOW
TARGET -OUTFLOW
ACTUAL -OUTFLOW PK-STAGE
STORAGE
DESIGN HYD:
.12
.00
.00 1.99
172
TEST HYD 1:
.12
.00
.00 1.80
170
STRUCTURE DATA: GRAVEL
TRENCH/BED (30 PERCENT VOID VOLUME)
RISER -HEAD
GRAVEL -BED
-AREA STOR-DEPTH
STORAGE -VOLUME.
2.00 FT
287.2
SQ-FT 2.00 FT
172 CU-FT
ROUTIN.G DATA:
STAGE(FT) DISCHARGE(CFS)
STORAGE(CU-FT) PERM-AREA(SQ-FT)
.00
.00
.0
.0
.20
.00
17.2
287.2
.40
.00
34.5
287.2
.60
.00
51.7
287.2
.80
.00
68.9
287.2
1.00
.00
86.1
287.2
1.20
.00
103.4
287.2
1.40 .00
1.60 .00
1.80 .00
2.00 .00
2.10 .31
2.20 .87
2.30 1.60
2.40 2.39
2.50 2.67
AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY:
SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB,
120.6
137.8
155.1
172.3
172.3
172.3
172.3
172.3
172.3
11.0 MINUTES/INCH
.P - PRINT IF/OF,
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
287.2
R - REVISE, S - STOP
1751 B90 4- (c00
- -- - -- 184.34'
7-7 4
(USIOD FOR EXISTING PATHWAY
SCL LOG)
DEW 9w
Ow POURED
w TYPE I w ISM
wo
EXISTING DECK
Er( PRODUCIIS
(OR I WAIJ
WI 104.0
E- M1.75i (r-S)
(r-K)
"I'm TESTED)
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
EXISTING AWN UPPER FLR. ELEV, 128.31
MAIN FUR � ELEV, 119.11
EXISTING ON, EXERCISE RM. FLR. ELEV.= 116.81
"WE S tf SPORT COURTC EXISTING PORCH
IFLTRADION TRM /-2-'\
5! VICE 56 LF (M)
MIN EX
1111,95
FN-2 11&77 V,
no)
IE'ITI ELOCK WALL
STAIRWAY &
0. 1111m
LAN= PER
L AROOTECT OMBRACTOR
C14 7�4 "I'll' I',, \ . ' \
(PERC TESTED) EKSTING CONC. WAL - K — I I \ \
GARAGE ROOR
SL-2 11&80±
(USED FOR le TIVE I AREJ ' I RMAN 02 KLTRATE RUNCIFF FROM THESE I
SOL LOG) ey cuz Cam E PRODWIS STARS WSW OF STAIRS AIM
ROPOSED ADDIT10
1111111- 104.10 NORTH SIOE OF HOUSE 11 MAN P.R. TUN, 116.81
COICIETE I UI-PER RP ELEV, 12IL31
IE- ;02.40 (r-ij & III HEAVY
IE- 0I Or -0 1 0 WSTRUCMRES AS CB13 (GIN m u WAGE 000% TYP
WiCESSARY FOR DWMY GRAN - 115.0 1 l+
lly WE x f COWAICIED 150f
i'q "M
COMECT C MALL
PA L51) NEW DOWGIOLITS
VA
wo
HE
ciy m
z
'4"o
E_ 02,7
E, m.,_
TEE
EX G175 LIN
-&Liz
I 11LI I F I I I I 1 1, 1 k I I I I I 1 224.0'
MP 114M II&C TW - IV&
11115 BoTrod . 115.0 ;�ZVMO�NE��
IIISTAUL 12 LF - MICH MP - 1103 BOTTOM - 110.0 FENCE
AS :,a
DIRM PER DETAL 3 NSTALL 1100 LIF EIDT1101111 - 10L5 Dam cymJDNE
VF� / DEW CYCILM
X160
-ARV6
slim
. i I . I . Page I of I
Jared Underbrink
From: John Launceford Olaunceford@bpcpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:44 PM
To: jaredu@cgengineering.com
Subject: FW: Sport Court
From: Don Hall [mailto:hansvilledon@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:25 PM
To: John Launceford
Cc: Allison Nelson
Subject: Sport Court
John:
Greetings!
Faye found her diary for 1977 which relates that in April '77 we painted the court, poured
the concrete steps by the south end of the court, looked for retaining wall ideas, and
landscaped around the court.
All this happened the year after we poured the court, I know this because ...
The project started with a hired bulldozer cutting into the bank near the house and
leveling the yard, creating quite a bit of fill where the southwest corner of the court was
going to be. This was allowed to settle for about two months while I kept inserting
water into the fill area with a pipe connected to the garden hose, to help it settle and
compact.
None of this could start until late spring so that the yard wouldn't turn into mud. After
we poured the court, we let it cure slowly to avoid cracks. Later that summer we put in
the basketball hoop and volleyball net posts. We played on the court the remainder of
that year before it was painted.
The following year, 1977, 1 treated the concrete with muriatic acid to get rid of any moss
and to create a better bond between the concrete and the paint. We put in the railroad
ties during the summer Of 1977-
In summary - the court was poured in 1976 and in early 1977 we finished the landscaping
and painting.
Hope this helps you. Say "hi" to Karen.
Best regards,
Don
03/23/2009
I* I
0
Storm Water Infiltration Report
FOR
Launceford Residence Addition
18703 Soundview Place
Edmonds, WA, 98020
4
I EXPIRES 9 / 5 /," V\ I
CG Engineering Project No. 07215.20
June 25, 2008
ENGINEERING
2504 1h Avenue S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
(425) 778-8500
CP10 I
6-,o�oa-
IS /A,., �
11'!rqLq
RESOB.-
JUN 3 0 2008
BLWNI:3'MW
C OF ONS"T
PROJECT SCOPE
�C-P-
IENGINCERING
The goal of this project is to successfully infiltrate the increased runoff on a site caused
by the increase of impervious areas. These impervious areas include.a 1,540 square foot
(so residence addition, a 1,870 sf asphalt replacement in the parking area, 450 sf of new
stairways, and 240 sf along the existing driveway. There is also a stairway on the north
side of the property which will be replaced. Because it would be difficul ' t to capture water
from this staircase, we have elected to infiltrate runoff from the staircase west of the
house instead with verbal consent from Don Fiene. This staircase adds approximately 100
sf to the design of the trench. We have also assumed that the 1,250 sf sport court west of
the house was built after 1977 and will need to be included in the design as well. The
total amount of area being infiltrated is 5,450 sf, or 0. 125 acres.
Runoff from the sport court and stairway flows southwesterly and will run towards the
area drain on the south side of the infiltration trench. Runoff from the residence addition,
asphalt, and stairways will flow toward the catch basin at the top of the driveway, which
conveys the stormwater to the infiltration trench. The small addition to the north of the
driveway is considered negligible and will not be conveyed to the infiltration trench.
Percolation tests were performed onsite by CG Engineering. Attachments in this report
include copies of the measurements found in the field, including soil logs and percolation
test results.
Calculations have been completed for an infiltration trench. Overall, it was determined
that a 55 foot long, 4 foot wide trench would be needed. The soil is well suited for
infiltration and no hardpan layer or groundwater was encountered. An overflow has been
provided on the north side of the site. It will be connected to an existing catch basin just
outside of the northwest comer of the site, which Will need to have its elevations verified
in the field.
In conclusion, our design of these infiltration trenches has been quite conservative. The
vertical permeability rate used is slow compared to the one tested in the field. The HYD
program doubles this rate. The 100-yr storm was used for the sizing of the trenches, and'
we are calling out 55 lineal feet of trench where only 53 lineal feet is required. A large
part of the new impervious areas are replacing areas that were impervious before.
Because of this, the finished site will have lower quantities of stormwater flowing toward
the street than the existing site, since much of the stormwater will be directed to the new
trench.
Attachments
e Aerial Photograph
0 �' Site Photographs
Falling Head Percolation Test Procedure
Field Notes
Soil Logs
Infiltration Calculations
Civil Drawings (11"xl7")
Storm Water Infiltration Report for Launceford Residence — Project #07215.20 Page 2
1
Aeptut
YO
";S- AT.-,
4
2' Addition
08/28/2007
t
tv -
59t
I PT
08/28/2007
Li
7
777--
08/28/2OD7
[M-T
low
Proposed
infiltration trench,�,_'
location
08/2812007
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
REFERENCE 6-A
FALLING HEAD PERCOLATION TEST PROCEDURE
REFERENCE SECTION 1-A
FALLING HEAD PERCOLATION TEST PROCEDURE
Source: EPA, Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems, 1980.
Number and Location of Tests
A minimum of three tests shall be performed within the area proposed for an absorption system. They
shall be spaced uniformly throughout the area. If soil conditions are highly variable, more tests may be
required.
Preparation of Test Hole
The diameter of each test hole is 6 inches, dug or bored to the proposed depths of the absorption systems
or to the most limiting soil horizon. To expose a natural soil surface, the sides of the hole are scratched
with a sharp pointed instrument and the loose material is removed from the bottom of the test hole. Two
inches of 1/2- to 3/4-inch rock are placed in the hole to protect the bottom from scouring when the water is
added.
Soaking Period
The hole is carefully filled with at least 12 inches of clear water. The depth of water should be
maintained for at least 4 hours and preferably overnight if clay soils are present. A funnel with an
attached hose or similar device may be used to prevent water from washing down the sides of the hole.
Automatic siphons or float valves may be employed to automatically maintain the water level during the
soaking period. It is extremely important that the soil be allowed to soak for a sufficiently long period of
time to allow the soil to swell if accurate results are to be obtained.
In sandy soils with little or no clay, soaking is not necessary. If, after filling the hole twice with 12
inches of water, the water seeps completely away in less than ten minutes, the test can proceed
immediately.
Measurement of the Percolation Rate
Except for sandy soils, percolation rate measurements are made 15 hours but no more than 30 hours after
the soaking period began. Any soil that sloughed in to the hole during the soaking period is removed,
and the water level is adjusted to 6 inches above the gravel (or 8 inches above the bottom of the hole).
At no time during the test is the water level allowed to rise more than 6 inches above the gravel.
Immediately after adjustment, the water level is measured from a fixed reference point to the nearest
1/16 th inch at 30-minute intervals. The test is continued until two successive water level drops do not
vary by more than 1/16 inch within a 90-minute period.
After each measurement, the water level is readjusted to the 6-inch level. The last water level drop is
used to calculate the percolation rate.
In sandy soils or soils in which the first 6-inch of water added after the soaking period seeps away in less
than 30 minutes, water level measurements are made at 10-minute intervals for a 1-hour period. The last
2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/24/05
40
0
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL
water level drop is used to calculate the percolation rate.
Calculation of the Percolation Rate
The percolation rate is calculated for each test hole by dividing the time interval used between
measurements by the magnitude of the last water level drop. This calculation results in a percolation rate
in terms of minutes/inch. To determine the percolation rate for the area, the rates obtained from each
hole are averaged. - (If tests in the area vary by more than 20 minutes/inch, variations in soil type are
indicated. Under these circumstances, percolation rates should not be,averaged.)
Example: If the last measured drop in water level after 30 minutes is 5/8-inch, then:
Percolation rate = (30 rninutes)/(5/8 inch) = 48 minutes/inch.
1/24/05 2005 Surface Water Design Manual
2:7"
2-Ap.5
35-5-
- -----------------
Ofn
SO
; ry
Fx-E:LD
ftOtA
SOI - L LOGS TAKEN SEPTEMBEOTH, 2007, BY JPU
SOIL LOG — 1
Oj$ -7777
ml
36"
50"
BROWN SANDY LOAM
011-18"
CONCRETE ENCOUNTERED @ 17"
POSSIBLE ABANDONED DRAIN
FIELD
RED BROWN SANDY LOAM
18"-36"
ROOTS ENCOUNTERED @ 42"
CRAY BROWN LOAMY SAND
36JP-50)1
SOIL LOG
11
u
51)
201)
m
.1'
2
BROWN SANDY LOAM
0"-5"
GREY BROWN SANDY LOAM
5"-20 ill
LIGHT BROWN SANDY LOAM
201?-38$)
GREY SAND
38"-45"
GREY BROWN SAND, MARBLED
45"-49" 1
4M
LAUNCEFORD RESIDENCE
DATE 9.26.07
DRAWING NO.
18703 SOUNDVIEW PL
PROJECT NO. 07215.20
61SIGIN&RING
EDMONDS, W k 98020
SCALE 1" = 10'-0'
TITLE SOIL LOGi
250 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 200
DRAWN BY JRP
Test Pit
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX 778-5536
DATED 9/17/2007
CHECKED BY JPU
APPROVED BY GAG
(425)
PLOT DATE. 9.26.07 nLE NAME Test PLdwg
40
0
KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
surface water management DiVision
HYDROGRAPH PROGRAMS
version 4.21B
1 - INFO ON THIS PROGRAM
2 - SBUHYD
3 - MODIFIED SBUHYD
4 - ROUTE
5 - ROUTE2
6 - ADDHYD
7 - BASEFLOW
8 - PLOTHYD
9 - DATA
10 - RDFAC
11 - RETURN TO DOS
SBUH/SCS METHOD FOR COMPUTING RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH
STORM OPTIONS:
1 - S.C.S. TYPEAA
2 - VDAY DESIGN STORM
3 - STORM DATA FILE
SPECIFY STORM,OPTION:
1
S.C.S. TYPEAA RAINFALL DISTRIBUTION
ENTER: FREQYEAR),�DURATIOQHOUR), PRECIP(INCHES)
100,24,3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
S.C.S. TYPEAA DISTRIBUTION
100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM *-** 3.00- TOTAL PRECIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO.
0,85,0.125,98,5
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREA(ACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
.1 .0 85.0 .1 98.0 5.0
PEAK-Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
.10 7.67 1256
ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
WHO
FILE ALREADY EXIST; OVERWRITE (Y or N) ?
n
ENTER [d:][path]filename[.ext] FOR STORAGE OF COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH:
100dev3
1) TYPE OF FACILITY: GRAVEL TRENCH/BED
2) STORAGE DEPTH(ft): 2.00
3) VERTICAL PERMEABILITY(min/in): 11.00
4) PRIMARY DESIGN HYDROGRAPH FILENAME: 100dev3
5) PRIMARY RELEASE RATE(C:fS): .00
6) NUMBER OF TEST HYDROGRAPHS: 1
TEST HYD 1 FILENAME: 100dev3 TARGET RELEASE(CfS): .00
7) NUMBER -OF -ORIFICES, RISER-HEAD(ft), RISER-DIAM(in): 0, 2.00, 12
8) ITERATION DISPLAY: NO
ENTER ITEM NUMBER TO BE REVISED (ENTER ZERO IF NO REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED):
0
INITIAL STORAGE VALUE FOR ITERATION PURPOSES: 1266 CU-FT
PERFORMANCE:
INFLOW
TARGET -OUTFLOW
ACTUAL -OUTFLOW
PK-STAGE
STORAGE
DESIGN HYD:
.10
.00
.00
1.99
135
TEST HYD 1:
.10
.00
.00
1.80
130
SPECIFY: D -
DOCUMENT,
R - REVISE, A
- ADJUST ORIF,
E - ENLARGE,
S - STOP
d
PERFORMANCE:
INFLOW
TARGET -OUTFLOW
ACTUAL -OUTFLOW
PK-STAGE
STORAGE
DESIGN HYD:
.10
.00
.00
1.99
135
TEST HYD 1:
.10
.00
.00
1.80
130
STRUCTURE DATA: GRAVEL TRENCH/BED (30 PERCENT VOID VOLUME)
RISER -HEAD GRAVEL -BED -AREA STOR-DEPTH STORAGE -VOLUME
2.00 FT 226.3 SQ-FT 2.00 FT 135 CU-FT
ROUTING DATA:
STAGE(FT)
.00
.20
.40
.60
.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
DISCHARGE(CFS)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.31
.87
1.60
2.39
2.67
STORAGE(CU-FT)
.0
13.6
27.2
40.7
54.3
67.9
81.5
95.0
108.6
122.2
135.8
135.8
135.8
135.8
135.8
135.8
PERM-AREA(SQ-FT)
.0
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
226.3
AVERAGE VERTICAL PERMEABILITY: 11.0 MINUTES/INCH
SPECIFY: F - FILE, N - NEWJOB, P - PRINT IF/OF, R - REVISE, S - STOP
B6'6-� M,
J J
__J ---- _
Ito
�Avyl T7
I�X- C410
AO A 13 - -
oE7_ :5,� e E�V it- J U. ti— 170 1 A-rf
I '67r
35LFT_
h6c
....... ...
TOVWIL J." 6pzu'�D SURFAC.,
L + J
rJjl —M I
11"MAY
�2, 34 1'
i i Wl
2 -�,37
VA5 h
Plb
W. \bp va-UME
L OSCI A 155
wr
CTRA Tioti- . . . . . .
t
J_ -------
!L
i J.,
-A
Description
ENGINECERING
2504thAve South
� 0 r�' TReN o*
Suite 200 Project Ll�w(JEI:ro�(tD
Edmonds, WA 98020 ADD In 00
By J?vJ
Scale p. 2-v
Job No.
'0 711 f" 0
Dateb- .-3
Date
Sheet No.
Ek OFFSTE
CATCH BASN NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.
ELEVATIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
MATE- IMO
r_jj/ E- N.75
= c M
4?
t
;: �o
T
L
SL-1
0 (USED FOR
EXISTING PATHWAY\
Ell
SOIL LOG)
Ir TYPE Il
DR
AREA AIN III
ky
dR OQUAL
WIN CREIE PRODUCTS
DUSTING DECX
04.0
F-
IE-V
F- 1
.751 (6--S)
2-W (C-N)
OPH-3
NEW STA]IrASE
(PERC TESTED)
EMSTWC
x
INFILl
E 55 U. r2)�
ATION TRENCH
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
WPER FLR. ELEX= 12&31
VAN U ELEV= 119.11
DOSTING CONC.
SPORT COURT
I DOSTING PORCH
EXERCISE Fu FUR M= 11681
d
t(pu
(PERC TESTED)
SL-2
(USED FOR
SOL UDG)
NEW STAIRS 1105
ir TALL
X
KEYSTONE BLOCK WALL
0 01 0 0
ONC. WALK IISL5D
0
DOSTING C
EKISlING SPORT\�IDUIFT WAS ADDP
Ir TYPE I V EA D& #2
BY CUZ COSOETE dRDCIkTS
R111- ID4.10
E- 102.40 V-S)/
Ll L GLEAV�kff (DRIVEWAY)
— — -- — -- — --
OPTIONAL
CAPPED OBSERVA71ON PIPE
18' TYPE I WITH 4 OR 6' PERFORATED PIPE
AREA BRAIN
INLET. SEE
PLAN
An
=D=
0
0
(PROPOSED A9*1)
IMPERAOUS %SRF
PROPOSED ADDITION
ARD
RATUIZALL ARI)
BRAIN #2Y
MAN F.R. UK- 116.81
UPPER FUL aEV.- 28.31
I
k1l: RUNOFF FROM THESE
STEAD OF STAIRS AILONG
wr
OF HOUSE
HEAVY 0
CRIVESAY CB
By BUZ CONCRETE PRGDVC�
EQK)
RES ASACESSW
DRIVEWA
(OR
GRATE- II5Z
IE- IU9 (C-4)
IE- 113.8 (r-W)
6.?Ve
II&GD 116,BD
LINE
�WCUT
F—
ps" RER=
POSTING ASPHALT_
6' RICO
PERFORATED PIPE FD2M GROUND SURFACE
0
WOO ROCI(
011 I I ilt-31r —
19_1
6* PVC
55 LF. I ir
TRENCH
6'
MIN.
TYPE 0
k DRAIN
OVERFLOW PIPE W1
DOWN TURNED ELBOW
DUSTING GROUND SURFACE OPTIONAL
OBSERVATION PORT
4"-6' PVC PERF PIPE
SECTION A
NTS
NATIVE BACKFILL
DOUBLE LAYER FILTER FABRIC
(12- MIN OVERLAP)
COMPACT BACXFU
6" RICID PERFORATED
PIPE LAID LEY11
WASHED ROCK
I Ilt - 3/4-
WRAP GRAVEL WITH
FILTER FABRIC SECTIONS
ON TOP AND SIDE OF TR04CH
a"
PIPE
IIENGINerERING
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 99020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 778-5535
SAAAAkA -
IJ Cut 4
DESIGN:
Jpu
DRAWN:
JRP
CHECK:
RMS
JOB NO:
07215.20
DATE:
09/28/07
z
0
CL
LLj
w
2
z
z 0
LAJ C14
0
Ld co
LLJ . 0)
>
a <
old
Z 3:
D
0 0 cli
0
ILL. V)
0
w
L) z
0
z o 0
!o 0
LLJ
SHEET:
C3.1
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CAh BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.
0""OUNDVIEW PLl.
18 7 0orl r*
fft�z D M 0 N D W AAl 9 o"' 0 " ZON 0
OWNER/APPLICANT CONSULTANTS
JOHN LAUNCEFORD
ARCHITECT
CIVIL ENGINEER
SOILS ENGINEER
18703 SOUNDVIEW PL
KALLSEN ARCHITECTURE
CG ENGINEERING
GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
EDMONDS, WA 98020
206.382.1679
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
13256 NE 20TH STREET, STE 16
425.774.4538
CONTACT. PHIL KALLSEN
EDMONDS, WA 98020
BELLEVUE,' WA 98005
425.778.8500 FAX 778.5536
425.747.5618 FAX 425.747.8561
CONTACT. JARED UNDEREIRINK
CONTACT. 'D. ROBERT WARD
GENERAL NOTES
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS
STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL,
STATE, MD FEDERAL CODES,
-CURRENT EDITION IBC
-CURRENT EDITION WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL
CONSTRUCTION
-WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWATER MMAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET
SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) -
2. STMDARD PLAN AND TYPE NUMBERS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS REFER TO WSDOT STANDARD
PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION.
3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN
PROGRESS.
4. DEVIA11ONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL
GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF *AS-BUIL'r
DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS FOR
SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE.
6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION.
7. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY
OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY MD NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO
FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT MY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE� TYPE AND
CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR NEW
UTILITIES. CG; ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE
EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING
WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF MY DISCREPANCIES.
10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL
THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL STE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN
STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT.
12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
13. MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, UTILITIES AND PAVEMENT SHALL BEAR ON MEDIUM DENSE TO VERY DENSE
NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL. IF SOIL IS DISTURBED, SOFL LOOSE, WET OR IF ORGANIC
MATERIAL IS PRESENT AT SUBGRADE ELEVATION, REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL
PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORI
14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS,
LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES.
15. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS. FOUNDATION DRAINS SHALL BE
INDEPENDENT OF OTHER SITE DRAIN LINES AND SHALL BE TIGHTLINED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM WHERE
INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF MY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE
TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL #
0004600300200
17. ALL ROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHALL
BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NO FOOTING AND SUBFLOOR DRAINS SHALL BE
CONNECTED TO DETENTION SYSTEM.
111 CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SITE
IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWNGS.
19. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE
EQUIVALENT OF THOR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND
STMDARDS.
20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR
THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLE11ON OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION CONTROL
PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS.
21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF
THESE STREETS WILL NOT, BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL.
22. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND IMPORT OF SOIL AND
ROCK MATERIALSARE REQUIRED
23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE, SHALL BE CONSTMT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS
SHOWN.
24. ANISHED -GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY F I ROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM
DISTANCE OF 10 FtET.
25. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MD SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING
AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER
EMSTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING
EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS
REQUIRED.
26. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALLOTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE
INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO
EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING
27. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE
REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND
28. NEW UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED,
LOCATIONS MAY BE SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE.
29. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6- OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC
FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES.
30. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE
BUILDING.
31. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWNGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK.
32. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
r
33. STREET CLOSURES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL TO
INSURE TRAFFIC FLOW IN AND AROUND THE INTERSECTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST ANY STREET
CLOSURE IN WRITING TO THE CITY ENGINEER, ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE. CLOSURE OF THE
STREET SHALL BE TEMPORARY IN NATURE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH OTHER
DEVELOPERS IN THE AREA, WHO MAY BE USING THE STREET FOR A CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. IF APPROVAL IS
GIVEN TO TEMPORARILY CLOSE THE STREET, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POST SIGNS AND NOTIFY THE
ADJACENT NEIGH80RS IN ADVANCE OF ANY CLOSURE
34. THE CONTRACTOR- SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MINIMIZE DUST CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAIN
DEVICES AND/OR PROCEDURE TO REDUCE DUST UNTIL THE WORK IS COMPLETE.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 2 & 3 AND THAT PORTION OF LOTS 11 & 12
OF OLYMPIC MEW DRIVE. ALL IN BLOCK C, EDMONDS
SEA VIEW TRAC'S, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, ON PAGE 76.
RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, EXCEPT THE
NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 12.
STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:
PIPES
1. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM WITH CURRENT EDITION OF WSDOT`S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION AND TO CITY STANDARDS.
2. ALL PIPE SHALL BE PLACED ON STABLE EARTH, OR COMPACTED GRAVE. MATERIAL
3. BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED EQUALLY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE PIPE OR PIPE -ARCH IN LAYERS WITH A
LOOSE AVERAGE DEPTH OF V, MAXIMUM DEPTH 8', THOROUGHLY TAMPING EACH LAYER. COMPACTED
LAYERS MUST EXTEND FOR ONE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE OR TO THE SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
(REFER TO WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 7-04.3(3) MD STMDARD SPECIFICATION 2-03.3(14)C, METHOD
B & C.
4. BACKFILL AROUND PIPE MUST BE COMPACTED TO A SPECIFIED AASHTO T-99 DENSITY OF 90X USE
REASONABLE CARE IN HANDLING AND INSTALLATION.
5. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE COUPLINGS, FITTINGS, ADAPTERS & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY
DESIGNED FOR THE INSTALLED PIPE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
6. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS.
CATCH BASINSAND MANHOLES
I. ALL CATCH BASINS SHALL BE TYPE I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL CATCH BASINS NTH A DEPTH OVER 5.0 FEET TO THE FLOW LINE SHALL BE A TYPE 11 CEI OR
LARGER (MANHOLE).
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING ALL MANHOL& INLET, MD CATCH BASIN
FRAMES AND GRATES PER CITY STMDMDS JUST PRIOR TO POURING OF CURBS AND PAVING.
4. Ali GRATES SHALL BE DEPRESSED 0.1 FEET BELOW PAVEMENT LEVI
5. ALL TYPE 11 CATCH BASIN MANHOLES, INLET, MD CATCH BASINS SHALL HAVE LOCKING LIDS.
6. STANDARD LADDER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL CATCH BASINS MD MANHOLES EXCEEDING 5 FEET
IN DEPTH.
7. ALL CATCH BASINS WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE LOCKING VANED GRATES
SHEET INDEX
C1.1 COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES
C2.1 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C2.2 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
C3.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
PUGET SOUND LT
PR JECT SITE
187TH ST SW
BLAKE PL 4m 90TH ST S%
CHERRYST
co
i!
LECBEND
DESCRIP11ON
EXISlING
PROPOSED
SITE PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
CLEARING LIMITS
SEDIMENT BARRIER
x x
CONTOUR LINE
_100- - - - -
100
FENCE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
-ss-
io _ss-_
MANHOLE
Q
STORM DRAIN MAIN
-SD- -SD-
SD
STORM DRAIN PIPE
ROOF DRAIN
R
FOO-nNG DRA14
F - - - F - - - -F-
F
PRESSURE LINE",",""ll"
- - -P
p
CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1)
El
m
-CATCH BASIN (TYPF 2)
5
CLEANOUT
0
CLEANOUT AND WYE
7_0
GRADE BREAK
- -
SURFACE SWALE
DRAINAGE ARROW
--------
WATER LINE
- - - - WA-
-
WA TER METER
1B
FIRE HYDRANT-
zyll,
FDC
PIV
0
GATE VALVE
x
TEE
90* BEND
THRUST BLOCKING
CAP
Li
CONCRETE PAVEMEIT
ASPHALT PAVEMENr
mom",
CRUSHED SURFACING
ROCKERY
C)cxDcx=x=xD
SPOT ELEVATION
*/-20.0
/-20.0
TELEPHONE LINE
T
- T
POWERLINE
-E
E
GASE LINE
-G
- G
SIGN
n
RESUB
� kE'ET
T JUN 3 0 2008
FILE
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
ENGINEIERING
250 4TH AVE. S.. SUITE 200
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 778-5536
G tj
2;5MM3M
TS
L
FE-FIRES: 9/
m m
2 m ----> 5
cn cn
Lj
0 a- a. a.
Lo
co
"C� �D
2
DESIGN:
ipu
DRAWN:
JRP
CHECK:
RIVIS
JOB NO:
07215. 20
IDATE:
09/28/07
z
0
i=
Ld
0
z
CL
0
ILLI
(N
�::
0
LLJ
00
LLJ
-
(3)
>
Z
00
V)
LL.
V)
Z
z
o
0
00
0
,r-
LLj
SHEET:
Ld
F_ F_
LLI 0
Ld Z
�r
V)
LLJ Ld
> z
0 Lu
00
, ml
NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.
FILTER FABRIC
SECURED TO 2' X 2'
14 GA. WIRE FABRIC
EQUAL
2' X 2' WOOD OR
EQUIVALENT
a,- 12,
--41 E;
8r
PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN
THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE.
%D
I
�u
CONTRACTOR/DEV ELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE
STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL.
1090-199V
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN
CONTINOUS ROLLS. USE STAPLES
OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH
FABRIC TO WIRE.
WIRE MESH SUPPORT FEUE
TO SUPPORT FILTER FAMIC.
- - - - - - - - - - -
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER
MATERIAL 8' TO 12'
6' MAX,
L\ 2' X 2' WOOD POSTS OR LJ
EQUIVALENT
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL
EROSION CONTROL METHODS BEFORE
OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN.
TY Qi-* F. - ...E. D '.0-' N.'
R VISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
FILTER FABRIC FENCE FILTRATION SYSTEMS
DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS DWG NO' E1.1
CITY OF EDMONDS STD. DETAIL - FILTER FABRIC FENCE
SCALE: NTS
MIN. RADIUS
QUARRY SPALLS
2-4' MIN DIA
8'-12' MIN. DEPTH
PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/
EGRESS AREA
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTROI
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN.
1090-199V
F- .-En... NA 0
REVISIONS
appofTvrn uv I STANDARD DETAIL
D. GEBERT 10/6/03 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
DATE 7/24/01 SCALE NTS OWG NO. E1.2
CITY OF EDMONDS STD. DE
SCALE: NTS
IL - STABLIZED CONSTUCTION ENTRANCE
RESUB
JUN 3 0 2008
ENGINEERING
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 778-5536
m m
0 m =:) =:)
F m (f) V)
cf) LLJ LLJ
w
I0
n Of w w
Ld Lij LLI Lu
0 a- a- CL
Lo
co
L (cc;=c�i) 1'c;�:)
IDESIGN: ipu
DRAWN: JRP
CHECK: RMS
JOB NO: 07215.20
DATE: 09/28/071
z
0
Z
(L
0
Ld
cq
0
V)
LLJ
00
LLJ
—
0)
o::
>
a
<
z
0
0
LL-
(n
Z
z
c)
0
=)
r--.
:2
00 m
v— UJI
SHEET:
z
0
(1) V)
0
Ld
Lij
0
0
CL
:2 Z
La
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
EX. OFFSITE
CATCH BASIN
ELEVA11ONS TO BE RE1.D VERIFIED
GRATE= 102.0
IE= 99.75
GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
SCALE: 1' = 10'
c 4 P To -6 F-� Lo C ice�b a m u---TA L�
OPTIONAL
18" TYPE 11 CAPPED OBSERVATION PIPE
WITH 4 OR 6' PERFORATED PIPE 60 RIGID FINISHED GROUND SURFACE
AREA DRAIN PERFORATED PIPE Z11
klm'104,10
I!E:-)
INLET, SEE
PLAN
w
6"1 Tvw. I I tl� �LEVLJJ
127 MAX. VARIES
Iff t i .
11110MI,
4 P, I P"
Fsnw "m w"m 50 6
'am.
NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.
lua
0 0110
0 0 0 0 0 0 -Er
PVC
N
WASHED ROCK I
0
2�,
A
Ell
55 LF. ±2' MIN.
Li I Li r- TRENCH
18" TYPE 11
AREA DRAIN
KI r% = 104,0
s) u�:-'
OVERFLOW PIPE W/
DOWN TURNED ELBOW
,(,gj
10 1 --75
EASING GROUND SURFACE
6* 1 N.
12' MAX.
24.0
OPTIONAL
OBSERVATION PORT
e-6m PVC PERF PIPE
NATIVE BACKFILL
DOUBLE LAYER FILTER FABRIC
(12' MIN OVERLAP)
COMPACT BACKFILL
60 RIGID PERFORATED
PIPE LAID LEVEL
WASHED ROCK
1 1/2- — 31e
WRAP GRAVEL NTH
FILTER FABRIC SECTIONS
ON TOP AND SIDE OF TRENCH
c
PJ\0
P�'ET(dEc-�)
AS t4(j1E1D
6' PVC N 1 6' PVC
DOWN TURNED ELBOW
1 2v' IN CB OUTLET PIPE
RESUB
IHKI onno
f ROOF RUNOFF INFILTRATION TRENCH PROFILE"'�Z?� ju
2 RIVEWAY C1
KS Ts
)�N
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION'OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
SECTION A
NTq
0 Lm—
N. G
w
I EXPIRES: 9/5/2009 1
m m
0 m =:) =:)
F: m V) cn
=) w w
in 0:: m
Of Q: ix
w Lu Lu Lu
Q CL C3- CL
lz�-
-Z��
4:z-1
�w-
ro
C)
Lo
co
co
< <
<11
2
DESIGN:
ipu
DRAWN:
JRP
CHECK:
RIVIS
JOB NO:
07215.20
DATE:
09/28/071
z
0
F-
Laj
L)
z
-j
CL
0
LLJ
04
a
�::
0
0
LLJ
00
LLJ
—
0)
>
0
-<
Z
0
00
LL-
V)
Ld
(-)
pn
Z
z
o
0
m
r--,
M
SHEET:
w
1 84.
m
s
0
z
3r
NE 1/4, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 27 'NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, Wom,
X. 0'�MTE
'A' TCH BA81N
1 A INS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
T
1V ET 10 2. 0
lr= 99.75
184.34 7
&*
SL-I
(USED FOR EXISTING PATHWAY
SOIL LOG)
uj 0-
EXISTING SPORT
COURT POURED
18" TYPE 11 IN 1§76. 4.0
AREA DRAIN #1 EXISTING DECK
by ClJZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS
(OR EQUAL)
RIM= 104.0
ca
IE= 131.75± (6"-S)
IE= W2.30 (6"-N)
NEW kAIRC�SE
(PERC TESTED)
F
0+00
EX 0.75 -
\_8. 3 7.
�y . ............. 224.0
:TOP 14.50
BOTT M 110.0
7
BOTTOM 110.0 �TTOM 113.5 MIS NO �CYCLONE
IMPROVE DITCH 6' 103.0 0 TOP = 114.50 P = 116.0 TOP 116.0
6Z, BOTTOM 102.0
0 TOP
94 AS NECESSARY 9" ASPHALT TOP 110.5 BOTTOM = 115.0
IC BOTT;MI 2.5
INSTALL 12 LF - TRENCH I FENCE
nDAim rwo ncTAii r, INSTALL 100 LF OF KEYSTONE THICKENED EDGE BOTTOM = 108.5 . ... ...
C'V[Cnklf% r%vr%i nkl[7 rrmr%c EXISTING CYCLONE
NOTE:
ORIGINAL SURVEY HAD INCORRECT ELEVATION
CONTOURS NEAR- THE WEST OF THE *SITE I . PARTIAL.
SURVEY WAS SHOT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THEDRIVEWAY
Tj-1111
6" PVC
6" PVC
AOL
'ENGINEERING
250 4TH AVE. S. SUITE 200
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 178-8500
FAX '(425) 778-5536
DOM TURNED ELBOW
IN CB OUTLET PIPE
12"
:2 U(.rj)
m m a)
0 :2 m 5 uj
F- m (n (/) c):::
M U-1 uj
RIVEWAY Cl U) CL, W >-
Ts
D-N
W Lu Uj U3 82
0 CL a- CL m
BASE LEVELING PAD NOTES:
1. THE LEVELING PAD IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED
OF CRUSHED STONE.
2. THE BASE - FOUNDA11ON IS ' TO BE APPROVED
BY THE SITE GEO'fECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR
TO PLACEMENT OF THE LEVELING PAD.
COMPAC UNIT
4 D'M 1811
EP : 12"
HEIGHT. 8
*WEIGHT. 85 LBS
S OP -
0.5' MIN
\-UNIT FACE
6" CRUSHED ROCK
LEVELING PAD
v
�12" I
zz,-
Lo
S�l
C,
C)
co
C)
to
c:l
V
<
DESIGN:
JPU
DRAWN:
JRP
CHECK:
kmS
JOB NO:
07215.20
DATE:
09/
BLOCK WALL OR EQUAL. I' TO FENCE *DIMENSIONS & WEIGHT MAY VARY BY REGION z
4' HIGH SEE DETAIL 4 0
GRADING & DRAINAGE. PLAN- Al A Nk KEYSTONE WALL 1' TO 41� HIGH
Ts
SCALE: 1" 10 4 NTS
EXISTNG GROUND SURFACE OPTIONAL: 10 0 5 10 20
OBSERVATION PORT <
OPTIONAL: .18" TYPE 11, 4".-V PVC PERF PIPE
18" TYPE 11 CAPPED OBSERVATION PIPE 6" RIGID AREA DRAIN OVED By Li
WITH 4 OR 6" PERFORATED PIPE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE NATlVE BACKFILL A R ENGINEERI��- 0
AREA DRAIN PERFORATED PIPE
z
FINISHED LEVEL OF CONCRETE CL 0
------ Li
LAYER FILTER FABRIC BE APPROX.
1��j -11-777111- (g, a
SURROUND TO
oo
I /p" ABOVE TOP OF
MIN OVERLAP)
ON
N-. I I
N 12" MAX.
I Ell Ll FFEVA
DOUBLE
(12
CHANNEL EDGE
12" MAX. VARIES COMPACT BACKFILL
0)
t EXPANSION JOINT
:I A: 111:1 1(, A 6" RIGID PERFORATED
0 <
0
XS LEVEL 611 IPE LAID LEVEL ASPHALT a Z 3::
MIN. WASHED ROCK
1 1. i - INSTALL ACO DRAIN
INLET, SEE
PLAN
0
6� pvc
0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OVERFLOW PIPE W/ 0 1 1/2" - 3/4" MODEL K100S OR EQUAL 1/2" MIN
00 -
DOWN TURNED ELBOW 24" WRAP GRAVEL WTH (/) 0
p -r< - , - - . -
I . )�20, FILTER FABRIC SECTIONS
0 0 ON. TOP AND SIDE OF TRENCH 0) Z
b-S- 6. CONCRETE 3000 PSI MIN
WASHED ROCK b z o 0
0 1 1/27-3/4- 0
00 a
BEDDING LAYER UJ
Owq
STREET FIL SHEET:
60" (AB) . 6lo
A
-56-L.R. 58 LF (AB) ±2' MIN. ]M SECTION A
TRENCH
z
CL
LLJ
0
-4::c 11
0
17
N IZ)
LWILDING 'IV' E N
ROOF RUNOFF INFILTRATION TRENCH PROFILtL vty c7- 71
� /- q �H �q� �%N �IN �CO N �CR E �TIE C3 ml
THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR AGENCY REVIEW AND . ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555.
0
RETAINING WALL SCHEDULE
WALL GEOMETRY
WALL REINFORCING
MAX.
. H"
"D'
T"
B"
t"
K"
"S" 13ARS
"F" BARS
4'-0"
0'-10"
0'-5"
1'-5"
8"
o"
#4 @ 12-
#4 0 12-
6'-0"
l'-2"
V-6"
2'-10"
8*'
0"
#5 @ 15-
#4 @ 15-
8'-0"
l'-2"
1 l'-6"
2'— 10"
1 8"
V-6"
#5 @ 12-
#4 @ 12"
NOTES:
1. FOUNDATION MUST BE ON UNDISTURBED SOIL
2. BEARING CAPACITY = 4000 PSF
3. EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE 55 PCF (NO SURCHARGE)
4. CONCRETE STRENGTH rc = 2500 PSI
5. STEEL REINFORCING fy = 60 KSI
6. POUR KEY NEAT AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH
TOP OF WALL
(2) — #5 CON T.
#5 @ 15., O.C.
CONT. HORIZ.
"S" BARS
1 1/2
4ED ,,--BACKnLL WITH FREE
Ld T'm ovr, wpf7p CLR. DRAINING MATERIAL
m
-
uj
:Z
HOLES @ 6'-0" D.C. W1
1/4- SQ. GALV. WIRE
MESH, TYP.
K
0
u MIN.
Lu
(If
0
FINISHED GRADE
o'w
PER ARCH.
J <
co
0- C" <
<
%
F" BARS
#4 @ 12- O.C.
"S" BARS
1'-0" SHEAR KEY
STD. WIPER SCHED.
#4 @ 15" SEE NOTE 6
SITE RETAINING WALL SECTION
SCALE: 1/2" = l'-O"
6 - 117-0 11 1
is
RESUB
JUN 3 0 2008
':�'= MM01
LAUNCEFORD RESIDENCE RETAINING MOVE im.
- '5
4EME 06/27/08
DRAWING NO.
18703 SOUNDVIEW PL
PROJECT NO. 07215.22
eNGIN&FUNG
EDMONDS, WA 98020
SCAILE 1/2' = 1'-0'
ITU
SITE RETAINING WALL SECTION
250 4TH AVIE. S.. SUITE 200
DRAWN BY ZOS
S---2
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 7-78-5536
CHECKED BY MTM
APPROVED BY GCC
PLOT DAM 6/27/08 FILE NAME. SS-2,dg
a-
0
_SXI'�T. Or-F-SITE
10
No
2 I)NIS
j 12
I �9TH PL
,2 V
W
Cr
ST
1OVERLOOK/.
42!s pl,
PL S
183
ST
6"D
so �jRd 11zT
S/1
k3
_71
Hu IL W
185TH
1652L
P, ", 'It\,
PK
187TH 186111 S� SW
sr w
.187T[?; ST SW
E0. S.alo�
188TH ST W
BI
W
k
189TH ST sW
AKE PL _L9 Sw
?L SW :V
. I Em
190TH ST SW
M
119
ST 9 M
__4_6_0 < 11elb.
T" N
SW
...... .......
MP
IN
PL 5
PL
DR
!LCULSIRR
PL
194
PC. — 194TH
'Fsw S
4
196 FS.
ST SW
ST SW
V�
E
i�
PIPUGEET
MELODY.IN Yr
W,
's-c-
: = r SW
EDMONDS
UNDERWA TER
BROWIERE y
BROOMERE
4sp r�_s 8" T
EWLAND
low
ST
ST W.
- i
00
00
—
PARK
BRAC
"LT" 800
IR +1�01�A.
ATIk
OTH
204SL1
—sw-. 83"
L r.
LANDI
BEACH
CWL
CA
T
GL
ILIWI'l IT 6
SIERRA' . !
IZT SIER4 IT' 1.
j OIN
iD j
b I �iw 202W PLSV
M
�E — 20 9M IT SM
aS PL
'ERRY TEMIM14
BMW
TS
5ALEY e- ST
jE 2MM FL
Xy TH IT SW
PL
HUMIN
HILL P K,
206
�T SW
461
PL
IT
Zl;,,
-11A
1,1!tK fl
INI S
SW
LS
-G-v
&OGIOn
L�0(
?[ax
7)
L -e-a I, ki o_,T
-T
aj\,
0-P
r-rN
GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS:
THE LAUNCEFORD RESIDENCE, ADDITIONS & ALTERATIONS
OWNER: JOHN & KAREN LAUNCEFORD
18703 SOUND VIEW PLACE
EDMONDS WA 98020-2385
ARCHITECT: KALLSEN ARCHITECTURE
310 FIRST SOUTH - ROOM 332
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
CONTACT: PHILIP KALLSEN
TEL 206-382-1679
FAX 206-343-5023
EML phil@kallsenarchitecture.com
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 2 AND 3 AND THAT PORTION OF LOTS 11 AND 12 LYING WESTERLY
OF OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE, ALL IN BLOCK C, EDMONDS SEA VIEW TRACTS,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 3 OF PLATS,
ON PAGE 76, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 75 FEET OF SAID LOTS 3 AND 12.
TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. o043,4600300Z.00
PROJECT SUMMARY:
THE WORK CONSISTS OF ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO THE
OWNERS' PRIMARY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITHIN THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON.:
Nothing in thisa pet4w"pproval-process snall be
interpreted as alinwing or permitting the
maintenam of any umurrently existing illegaL
nonconfomingag unptrmjrtPid buildin&
or site conditittwhich 4 out4ikle the scol
the
=e
it applic"n, Mp,- rdjofo, 4 whether)mch N,
or condition is shown Pn the
FOOTING DRAINS NOT
TO BE TIED INTO
DETENTION SYSTEM
ZONING CODE SUMMARY:
PROPOSAL IS A PERMITTED USE WITHIN ZONING DESIGNATION RS-12.
LOT AREA= 25,521 S.F.
BUILDING SETBACKS:
REQ'D EXISTING PROPOSED
FRONT(WEST) 91trlf 1 89, 89'
REAR(EAST) 25' 32' 25'
SIDE (NORTH) 10, 12' 12'
SIDE 10 63' It=6, /0
APPLICABLE CODES
ALL WORK TO CONFORM TO CURRENT EDITIONS OF LISTED CODES:
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING & RESIDENTIAL CODE (IBC, IRC)
INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE
WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE (WSEC)
WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION & INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE (VIAQ)
EDMONDS'-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION R3
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VB
DESIGN LOADS
DEAD LOAD STRUCTURE 15 PSF
DESIGN LIVE LOAD (RESIDENTIAL) 40 PSF
DESIGN LIVE LOAD (DECK) 65 PSF
DESIGN LIVE LOAD (STAIR) 100 PSF
DESIGN LIVE LOAD: ROOF (SNOW) 25 PSF
DESIGN LATERAL LOAD (WIND) 20 PSF
WIND SPEED 85 MPH
EXPOSURE C
SEISMIC CATEGORY D2
bK
A�D
Ir
IL 41 0
v e
IS . . . . . . IT
I" L "Ila
I L -A T
A,
L. ......
C-1 t N40
1�' L
TOP
440
r-4
NFW LAWr
5L.4kil SL. i t6.%l
U P
ILA 'FL?, E LA
TOP, F-L..l
- 1 z
7
y
r I
% I vm�w
vs 9,
It
u R E�
0 tv 00
tv ry fv
IV
TOP &L. L—TiDlz El.-
I'Ll . 0 V% 4;1 - 0
sae.-S-TF;tucrum&L.. j;11zr4IL.S.
13*,� C CZ F. N4 I N I. Fs. g i N en po g
BUILDING 141EIGHT CALCULATION
DATUM POINT*
100.01
POINT "N'(NW CORNER OF INSCRIBED RECTANGLE)
112.0'
POINT "B" (NE CORNER OF INSCRIBED RECTANGLE)
131.8'
POINT "C" (SE CORNER OF INSCRIBED RECTANGLE)
I I C1 44
POINT "D" (SW CORNER OF INSCRIBED RECTANGLE)
t 0 ck.roco
AVERAGE GRADE (jT31%7- / 4)
118.28
MAXIMUM ALLOWED 118.28' + 25')
143.28
GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
116.81
UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION
128.31
MAXIMUM PROPOSED (TOP OF RIDGE ELEVATION)
141.56'
PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT
23.2W
*DATUM POINT: TOP OF EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE
COVER
LOCATED IN SOUNDVIEW PLACE CLOSELY NORTH OF NORTHWEST
PROPERTY CORNER
LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION
EXISTING + PROPOSED DWELLING FOOTPRINT AREA
4098 S.F.
PORCHES & STEPS
1460 S.F.
LOT COVERAGE
5558 S.F.
LOT COVERAGE PERCENTAGE
21.8%
LOT SLOPE CALCULATION
PROPERTY HIGH POINT (NORTHEAST CORNER)
136.0'
PROPERTY LOW POINT (NORTHWEST CORNER)
103.0'.
GRADE DIFFERENTIAL
33'
HORIZONTAL SEPARATION
224'
LOT SLOPE
14.7%
DESIGN LOAD CRITERIA:
d
FLOOR LIVE LOAD (RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY) 40 PSF
FLOOR DESIGN LL + DL
55 PSF
STAIR LIVE LOAD
100 PSF
STAIR DESIGN LL + DL
115 PSF
DECK LIVE LOAD (RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY) 60 PSF
DECK DESIGN LL + DL
75 PSF
ROOF LIVE LOAD (SNOW)
25 PSF
ROOF DESIGN LL + DL
40 PSF
SOIL CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE:
1500 PSI UNTESTED
BASIC WIND SPEED 85 MPH EXPOSURE "B"
(USE 20 PSF)
SEISMIC:
ZONE D1
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
SOIL TYPE
FIRM GLACIAL TILL
ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE
1 Rnn D-Qr:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION "j qq I 6�
EXISTING DWELLING ROOF OUTLINE 3052 S.F.
PROPOSED ADDITION ROOF OUTLINE 1945 S.F.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY 3015 S.F.
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WIDENING 250 S.F.
EXISTING SPORT COURT, DECK, & WALKWAYS 2520 S.F.
PROPOSED PATIO & WALKWAY ADDITIONS 270 S.F.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA 11,052 S.F.
TOTAL SITE AREA 25,521 S.F.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO 43.3%
IMPERVIOUS AREA EXISTING PRIOR TO JULY 1971 66qu S-f
IMPERVIOUS AREA ADDED SINCE JULY 1977 Gf-
PROPOSED INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 2465 S.F.
-FC+aL- I OA()efV(OA)5 SIOCe lill ID BY W-Wk*D .qtrj. r-,f,
HYDEX TO DRAWINGS
I VICINITY MAP, PLOT PLAN, GENERAL NOTES
2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN
3 UPPER FLOOR PLAN
4 SOUTH & WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS
5 NORTH & EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS
6 BUILDING SECTIONS
7 FOUNDATION PLAN
UPPER FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
8 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
PORCH FRAMING PLANS
9 ROOF PLAN
10 ELECTRICAL PLANS
11 CABINETRY ELEVATIONS
12 DRAINAGE DETAILS
13 SITEWORK DETAILS
14 FOUNDATION -DETAILS
15 FRAMING DETAILS
16 ROOFING DETAILS
17 WINDOW &CLADDING DETAILS
18 DOOR DETAILS
19 STAIR & RAIL DETAILS
20 INTERIOR FINISH DETAILS
21 OUTLINE SPECIFICATION
22 OUTLINE SPECIFICATION
S-1 SITE SURVEY DRAWINGS
C1 .1 CIVIL COVER SHEET & GENERAL NOTES
C2.1 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C2.2 TEMPORARY EROSION TESC DETAILS
C3.1 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
R SUB
JUL 112008 .......
NA
BU RT
8WORFE
Zone Comer Flag—
�Setb&kj geqw
�red
Front PI/ ?Is- STREET FILE
Sides X15 10 4/0 jz 1 (0
Rear r- ZT ?-S-
Other RESUB
Height
JUN 3 0 2008
'ILA N RME
CaaW40 SNT
10
IN
S
M,
g
. . . . . . . . . .
0
g"11,
N,
x
k
MT,
c::
C=
CX3
c
m
m 019
0 C= (7-
Z4 C= -
co It
4
0100
4-1
Ito 4-1 -b 0
-41
IA tlAID
FO 4
10% l(O k 1-7 C6, I LO T
r-" 1 AJ
Date:
tODI ,,6 Ll 5
� qA
�wt)(ne) 6AO,'5
MAY 08 2008
�=' I ��� I c =- - -J
'Ab 0. -- I- P, op