18916 SOUNDVIEW PL.PDFIiiiiiiiiiiii
13217
18916 SOUNDVIEW
PL
-,T
ADDRESS: 1 9V/6
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL N
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW S
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
. :2703
X� /—�7 &0()
. 0;_07
CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: F] Conditional Waiver �Rftudy Required E] Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:_c
PERMITS
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: U
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:- /,g L9
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
Z(ay
SOILS REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
LATEMADST'sTonnAStreet File Checklist.doc
J. KEITH CROSS, P.E.
Geotechnical Engineering Consultant
(425) 747-2150 RECEIVED
P.O. Box 1986, Bell evue, Washington 98009-1986
SEP 13 2011
August 16, 2011
Margret Voetmann
18916 Soundview Place
Edmonds, Washington 98020
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER
Geotechnical Engineering Site Visit, Proposed Stream Side Vegetation Planting
Observations, Existing Residence, 18916 Soundview Place, Edmonds, Washington
Project No. 9487-001
This letter is prepared to provide a brief overview of my observations made during a visit to the
subject site on May 27, 2011, and subsequent discussions. During the site visit I met with you
and your landscape architect, Carol Rea, and discussed my observations and recommendations
associated with replacing the non-native invasive'vegetatidn between your house and the stream
along your eastern property boundary. The purpose of my visit was to make, observations of the
soil conditions in the subject area. This letter is a brief summary of my observations and
background research, and our May 27 and subsequent discussions, and is intended to highlight
general areas of my observations.
The subject site is located to the north of downtown Edmonds. The lot is an east -west elongated
parcel that slopes westward and lies just east o f the railroad right-of-way that is adjacent to Puget
Sound. The house is elongate in the east -west direction and occupies much of the length of the
southern portion of the lot. A moderately steep sided drainage feature runs east to west in the
northern portion of the lot, with portions of the northern slope on the adjacent property.to the
north. This drainage is understood to have a year -around flow which discharges into a culvert
system that drains beneath the railroad right-of-way. In addition to the culvert.system, there are
other "hard" erosion resistance features in the drainage. The drainage slopes are predominately
vegetated with a variety of native and non-native invasive vegetation types.
There are two geologic maps of the Edmonds area. Each of these maps appear to have their
areas where they are more accurate than the other map. The 1975 "Preliminary Surfidial
Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles, Snohomish and King
Counties, Washington", by Mackey Smith (WADNR), has long been 6 useful tool in
understanding the geologic deposits of the Edmonds area. in'1983, the LISGS published
r-
FA,
Letter to Margret Voetmann
Project No. 9487-001
August 16, 2011
Page 2
"Geologic Map of the Edmonds. East and part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington"
by James P. Minard. This was part of a group of geologic quadrangle maps published under
Minard's name at this time. These maps covered a significant portion of southwestern
Snohomish County and portions of nearby northern King County. At the site vicinity these maps
are somewhat different in their mapping but generally indicate that there is a sand and gravel
deposit which overlies the silty Whidbey Formation which is present at and slightly 'above sea
level. My site observations would generally concur with this mapping having observed some silty
and sandy soils on the slope between the house patio areas and the "stream" thread.
I?uring my May 27, 2011 site'visit, we discussed the concept of removing the invasive non-native
vegetation from the drainage slope. Various considerations were discussed, however most of the
discussion revolved around replanting the area with a mixture of non-invasive native shrubs and
ground cover that would allow the enjoyment of the soothing effects of the water flow in the
drainage. Although there are no spawning beds in the drainage (partly due to the culvert
system), minimization of the erosion potential is considered a primary function of the proposed
landscaping of this area. therefore, we discussed techniques which would have minimal
modification to changes in the ground topography (except to flatten localized over -steepened
areas and fill in min or depressions). These are mainly hand and shovel type operations without
the use of machinery. I recommended that an erosion containment barrier (such a coir logs or a
"silt fence") be placed adjacent to the water during the vegetation removal and replacement
operation. Unless the coir logs are well staked in place and, monitored during high water flows,
these containment barriers should be removed when planting operations are completed to reduce
the risk of these barriers being loosened.during high water flows and creating blockage to the
culvert system under the railroad right-of-way.
Plant 'selection, spacing and placement should be determined by the landscape architect, as this'
expertise is not in th'e training of geotechnical engineers. I would however suggest that if a jute
netting or weed block fa.bric is used (with the plants set in cut openings), the sheets of fabric
should be lapped such that the upstream layer overlies the downstream layer (like shingles).
This will help keep water flo . w from lifting and displacing the fabric. Compost mulch placed
between the plants has been found to assist in providing erosion resistance from meteoric and
minor rilling erosion mechanisms.
J. KEITH CROSS, P. E.,' P.O. Box 1986, Bellevue, Washington 98009-1986
Letter to'Margret Voetmann
Project No. 9487-001
August 16, 2011
Page 3
It is my opinion that the proposed vegetation replacement plan will be'beneficial in that it will
remove non-native invasive plants from the area and replace them with native plants that will
improve erosion resistance. Additionally, the Prea is expected to be more esthetically pleasing
and will remove habitat for undesirable critters, such as rats.
This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of Margret Voetmann and her agents with
respect to the subject project. The observations and opinions expressed herein are based on the
limited scope of work and the interpreted site conditions as they presently exist.
I trust that this input meets -your needs at this time. If there are any questions concerning this
letter, or if we can provide additional services, please call.
Yours very truly,
/i. Keith Cross, P.E.
y
WAS*,,
0
I E�Ptmftloa I / I
J. KEITH CROSS, P.E., P.O. Box 1986, Bellevue, Washington 98009-1986
oi
.2 0
\U ru Vwryvo w
09
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwdedmondsma.us
%,� — �-- �- DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
IP C. 189,11 Planning - Building - Engineering
February 6, 1.009
Daniel Voetman
18916 Sound View PI
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: Removal of Hazard Trees within Critical Area at 18916 Sound View Pl.
Dear Mr. Voetman:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
The City of Edmonds has reviewed all of the materials submitted by Shelley Towers of A Grand
Design and Landscape, LLC regarding hazard trees oil your property and along Fruitdale Creek.
Ms. Towers identified six hazard trees in her report. Five of the trees (trees 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6) are
located on your property. Pursuant to ECDC 18.45.030.13, the removal of hazard trees are
exempt from the City of Edmonds tree removal regulations. However, these trees are also located
within a critical and/or a critical area buffer. Hazard trees may also be removed from critical
areas and there associated buffers, provided the tree removal is consistent with ECDC
23.40.220.7.b. The hazard tree evaluation and planting plan submitted by Ms. Towers appears to
be consistent with the requirements of ECDC 23.40.220.7.b.
Trees 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 as identified on the site plan submitted by Ms. Towers may be removed,
provided they are replaced at a ratio of 2 to I consistent with the planting plan also submitted by
Ms. Towers. Pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220.7.b.iv, the replacement trees must be replanted within
one year of tree removal. Please provide documentation to the City of Edmonds when this
planting has occurred.
The location of tree number 4 must be verified before it can be removed. If tree number is
located on your property, provide documentation that it is on your property and it may be
removed by you consistent with the submitted report and planting plan. If tree number 4 is not
located on your property, the property owner whose property it is located must request its
removal if they wish. The materials submitted by Ms. Towers can be used for justification for its
removal.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, 425-771-0220.
ly
Lien
sociate Planner
Eric]: Hazard tree evaluation and planting schedule submitted by A Grand Design and
Landscape
Cc: Street File
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
To: City of Edmonds
Tree Removal Permitting Dept.
From, Shelley Towers, ISA
A Grand Design and Landscape, LLC
425-334-8068
Re: Voetmann Residence,
18916 Sound View Pl.
Edmonds, Wa. 98020
I was asked to evaluate 6 trees for hazard on the Voetmann site. I visited the site on I I-
07-08. 1 completed 6 ISA Tree Hazard Evaluations, one per tree, These evaluations will
be furnished to you, along with this letter.
Site observations: All 6 trees are within, 40' of a creek.
All 6 trees are on steeply sloped property, with dense underbrush. The soil is loose and
disturbed, some cracking was observed. In three cases, there was major grade change
within the drip line. (Hedera helix) Ivy is on all 6 trees. Please see attached tree survey
for locations of the trees on site as well as proposed locations for replanting.
Synopsis: All of the trees showed evidence of major, previous failure. Three of the
largest trees have major dieback, and asymmetry. Two of the trees are dead. I am
recommending that all trees be taken down, and the stumps trunks and brush left in situ
to help hold the soil. The ownership of tree #4 is in question. By looking at the Sno Co
website it appears to belong 18910 Sound View Pl. This information needs to be verified
before action is taken.
.Replanting plan. I am suggesting that the trees be replaced at a ratio of 2 to 1, with (6)
Acer circinaturn multi trunked 6' min, and (6) Tsuga mertensiana, 6' min. Replacement
trees should be dispersed evenly. over the site, where they are most apt to survive. On
somewhat level areas, where they will receive adequate water, and there will be minimal
erosion and bareing of the root ball
I am available for telephone consultation on this project, and I have digital photography
that I can e-mail to illustrate these issues.
Sincerely,
Shelley Towers, ISA
425-334-8068
sdtinsno@yahoo.com
4M:5 (-to, 5a Wj�Akrl CURL..
0
KlVLWT'l kG
A14A
VocrNANA-AtE �50i&
IBUO
AT
RECEIVED
NOV 19 2008
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
4a'.9 77 C0 7
C' G 7 7 q q 7 1131,
M
9 1 e- L3
c� o2-0
(4 EU�0- y X-S4
To: City of Edmonds
Tree Removal Permitting Dept.
From, Shelley Towers, ISA
A Grand Design and Landscape, LLC
425-334-8068
Re: Voetmann Residence,
18916 Sound View P1.
Edmonds, Wa- 98020
I was asked to evaluate 6 trees for hazard on the Voetmann site. I visited the site on 11 -.
07-08. 1 completed 6 ISA Tree Hazard Evaluations, one per tree. These evaluations will
be furnished to you, along with this letter.
Site observations: All 6 trees are within, 40' of a creek.
All 6 trees are on steeply sloped property, with dense underbrush. The soil is loose and
disturbed, some cracking was observed. In three cases, there was major grade change
within the dripline. Ivy is on all 6 trees
Synopsis: All of the trees showed evidence of major, previous failure. Three of the largest
trees have major dieback, and asymmetry. Two of the trees are dead. I am recommending
that all trees be taken down, and the stumps left in situ to help hold the soil.
I am available for telephone consultation. on this project, and I have digital photography
that I can e-mail to illustrate these issues.
r y,
SA
-,ZfSh geyy owers, ISA
425-334-8068
sdtinsno@yahoo.com
0 stakes 0 wirejdes 0 signs U Moles
Fol,taw density- 0 normal' Ersparse Leaf size: [I normal all [3 Curb/pavemenL D guards
Ar�ual shoot growth- � 0 excellent E3 average TvAg Dieback7
woundwood development: 0 excellent 0 average 0 poor Onone 0 other'
Viga ciass: . 0 excellent. 0 average 0 fair
Major pests/diseasm:
SITE CONDITIONS
0 Open space ;?nat*ural 0 woodlandWorest
Site Ctwacter [3 residence 0 commercial 0 industrial 0 park
,Jaeind break
[3 parkway 0 raied bed 0 container El mound 0 lawn 0 shrub border
Landscape type: . 0 triank wettled
inrkj;ffiorr /none 0 adequate 0 1 adequate 13 excessive
Recent site distLatancel, 0 soil disturbance [3 grade change 0 line clearing 0 site clearing
50-75% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N
• dripline paved: 0% 10-25% 25-50%
:F I 25%1��50-75% 75-100%
• dripline wi rill soil: (30/0 10-
0% 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100%
• dfipline grade lowered:
aline 0 alkaline 11 acidic C] small volume se center,0<Story of fail
5gil problew arainage U SHM —1 U
0 clay 0 expans;v4 dep *-
Obstructions- -w 0 overhead lines 11 underground utilities Zfric [I d' ent veg. 0
lights 0 signage 0 line -of -sight 13 vie tly 0 windward. canopy edge 7area prone to windthrow
Exposure to wind: 11singletree Elbelowcanopy Oabovecanopy C3,ecen exposed
Prevailing wind directiom occurrence of snowrice . storms 0 , never. . E3 seldom 0-FqU'ariJ
TARGET
Use Under 1hem )dtbuilding 0 parking 0 traffic 0 pedestrian 0 recreation Knd
Can target be moved? Y&-��an use be restliCted? yo'
ent use 4 �con nt use
Ll intermittent use 0 freqL
13 hardscape 13 small features 0 utility line-,
no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form.
The International Society of Arbortculture assumes
lo%�
;.�eiife 0
deg. firom' Soil heaving: Y N
I tural �OLmnatural 0 seir-corrected
Decay in plane of lean�o N Roots broken Soil cracking: Y N
A
Compounding factors: Leanseveritr. Osevere Ornuderate 0 low
CROWN DEFECTS: Indicate presence of individual defects and rate their severitv (s - severe. m - moderate. I - Inw)
DEFECT
ROOTCROWN
TRUNK
SCAFFOLDS
BRANCHES
Poor taper
Bow sweep
Codominantsiforks
Multiple attachments
Included bark
Excessive end weight
CR
Cracks/splits
Hano;Iers
Girdling
Wowds/seam
Decay
cavity
Corflos/mushrooms/bracket
Bleeding/sap flow
Loose/cracked bark
ntir le/bee hive
[0 [!OR O(vold TIM 0 A R Alcol
TREE HA ZA RD E VA L UA TION FORM2nd
Edition
Site[Address: ua
HAZARD RATING:
+ +
Map/Location: ir,-6.44%.tp,
_A_
Failure + Size + Target Hazard
Owner. public private
unknown other
Potential of part Rating Rating
Date: rispector
—;Ti
�,F,
Immediate action needed
Date of last inss�*on:
Needs further inspection
—, .---Dead tree
I KIM tPrIPWAto I ltKI3 II
Tree #: -r-
speeie. .- Ze-ioq 'r V4:m 1 '% 3.. g '=--f
II # of trimllm Height:
Form RTgenerally symmetric 0 minor asymmetry 13 major asymmetry 0 stump sprout 13 stag -headed
Crown class: Jddominant 0 co -dominant 0 intermediate 0 suppressed
Live crown ratio: % Age class: .0young 0 semi -mature 0 mature 0 over-maturetsenescent
Pruning hismy. El crown cleaned 0 excessively thinned 0 topped 0 crown raised 0 pollarded 0 crown reduced 0 flush cuts 1:1 cabledibraced
11 none 0 multiple pruning events Approx. dates:
SpecialValue: "Ospecimen Oheritagethistoric Owildlife Ounusual Ostreettree 0 screen 0 shade 0 indigenous El protected by gov. agency
TREE HEALTH
Foliage color 0 normal 0 chlorotic 01nnecrotic Epicormics? Wo Growth obstructions -
Foliage density- 0 normal J�5pam Leaf size 1 0 normal [Is 1 13 stakes. 0 wireffies 0 signs 0 cables
�.Y 0 curb/pavement 0 guards
Annual shoot growth: 0 excellent 11 average Dvdor Twig Dieba�7 e�4
Woundwood development 0 excellent 0 average El poor ZMEne 0 other
Vigor ctass: 0 excellent 0 average 0 fair ��r
Major pests/diseases:
SITE CONDITIO
Site Character: .7residence E3 commercial E3 industrial 0 park 0 open space 0 natura . 1 13 woodlandVorest
Landscapetype:. 13parkway 0 raised bed 0 container 0 mound 13 lawn 13 shrub border 0 wind break
Irrigation: 0 none 0 adequate, 11 inadequate 0 excessive . 0 trunk wettled
Recent site disturbance? Y N 0 construction 13 soil disturbance 0 grade change 0 line clearing 0 site clearing
% dripline paved: 00/0 10-25 50-75% 75-100% Pavement I ifted? Y N
% dripline wl fill soil: 10-25 50-75% 75-100%
% dripline grade lowered. 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100%
Soil problems: 0 ge 0 shallow icompacted 11droughty III 0alkaline Dacidic 0 small volume 0 disease center 0 history of fail
7clayna 0expansive IZISIOI)elff'�- aspect:
Obsbucfions- Olights Osignage Oline-of-sight V<ew Eloverheadlines 11underg I round utilities 0 traffic 13 adjacent veg. 0
Expowne to wind. 0 single tree 0 below canopy. 13 above canopy 13 recently exposed 11 windward, canop�ydge � iarea prone to windthrow
Prevailing wind direction: Occurrence of snowfice storms 0 never 0 seldom ?1�;ularl�
TARINT
Use Under Tree: building 0 parking 0 traffic. 0 pedestrian 0 recreation 0 landscape 13 hardscape 0 small features 13 utility lines
Can target be nioved? Y,2 Can use be restricteI Y
Occupancy: .0 occasional use 0 intermittent use 0 frequent use �� 'constant. use
The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derived.from use of this form.
A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas
TREE HA ZA RD E VA L UA TION FORM2nd Edition
Site/Address:
Map/Location: = 1. 2A
Owner: publiri — private unknown _ other
Date: i �/ Inspector:
1 7
Date of last inspection: It -
TREE CHARACTERISTICS
,DEE mmova"o
HAZARD RAIFING.
. .......
�+ +
.
Iure w + T
P of pan Rating
ha;�r_d
Rating
Immediate action needed
Needs fimther inspection
Dead tree
twu
. — —
TREE CHARACTERISTICS )Md tree
Tree #: slmcies:
DBW
#of trunks: —I— Height
Form: 0 generally symmetric 0 minor asymmetry Plnri�ajor asymmetry 0 stump sprout stag -headed .
Crown cJass.* 1:1 dominant _P1110' -dominant 11 intermediate 0 suppressed
Live crown rago-
_�v % Agecfass: Oyoung [3semi-mature Elmature 2ro-v-er-matureisenescent
Prun I ing histaT. 0 crown cleaned 0 excessively thinned 0 topped El crown raised 13 pollarded 13 crown reduced 0 flush cuts Ocabledbraced
0 none 0 multiple pruning events Appro)L dates:
Special Value: 0 specimen 0 heritagefttoric 0 vvildlife El unusual 13 street tree 0 screen 0 shade 0 indigenous 11 protected by gov. agency
TREE HEALTH
Foliage color III non-nal EXhlorotic necrotic Epicomf=? Y N Growth obstructions:
Foliage density- 0 normal ' rse Leaf size: 0 normal Q small
P'spa 0 stakes 0 wirelties, 0 signs 0 cables
Annual shoot growth: 0excellent Oaverage Opoor Twig Dieback7 Y(a 0 curb/pavement 0 guards
Woundwoml development 0 excellent 13 average ,,p poor ,I �none 13 other
Vigor class: 0 excellent 13 average 13 fair
Major pests/diseaw-s:
SITE CONDITIONS
Site Character: ?9idence El commercial El industrial 0 Park 0 open space 0 natural 0 woodiandVorest
Landscape type: Lrparkway 0 raised bed 0 container 0 mound El lawn 0 shrub border ��nd break
Irrigat �none 0 adequate El inadequate 0 excessive 0 trunk wettled
Recent site disturbance?&— N goc"ction "il disturbance El grade change 11 line clearing 0 site clearing
% dripline paved: 01Y0 10-25% 634 W-7*5% 75-100% Pavement I ifted? Y � N
% dripline w/ fill sail: 00/0 10-25% 5D-75% 75-100%
% dripline grade �wered: �0
096 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-10D%
Soil problems: 0 drainage 0 shallow 0 compacted 11 droughty 0 saline E3 alkaline 0 acidic 0 small volume 13 disease cen
13 clay 0 expansive 0 Slope _* aspect ter 2tfistory of fail
Obsbimfions: 13 ' lights Osigpage Oline-of-sight Oview Doverheadlines 13 underground utilities Otraffic Aadlacfntveg. [I_
ExposuretavvintE Elsingletree Elbelowcanopy 0above.canopy El recently exposed 0 windward, canopy edge �; Kea prone to windthrow
Prevailing wind direWon: Occurrence of snowrice storms 0 never El seldom 'W'�;Wy
TARGET
Use Under Tree: F61uildi parking 0 traffic 11 pedestrian 0 recreation pfan�scape 0 hardscape 13 small features 13 . utility lines
C
Can target be moved? Y an us�6 be restricitev Y-0
Occupancy: 0 occasional us . e 0 intermittent use 0 frequent use V_C_0�nstant use
The Internationai society Of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for Conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form.
UL;L1 Co U0 ua; JL I cl OMCL-L-c F I Ljwrama -rcc) .3�3-r-auuo, 0
TREE DEFECTS
ROOTDEFECTS.
Suspe ')N Y N
ct root rot: (,Y Mushroorn/conk/bracket present: ID -
Exposed mots: 13 severe Jdlm'�;rate 0 low Undermined; [I severe L:I.�erate 0 low
Root pruned.- distance from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounde& Y N When:
Restricted root area: 0 severe 0 moderate El low Potential for root failure: 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low,
LEAN: deg. from vertical 0 natural ,-<unrnatural D self -corrected Soil heaving: Y N
Decay in plane of lean: 6N Roots broken OY Soil cracking. Y N
Compounding factors: Lean severity- 0 severe. 0 moderate 0 low
CROWN DEFECTS. Indicate presence of iridividuall defects and rate their severity (s severe, m moderate, I = low)
ROOT CROWN
TRUNK
SCAFFOIDS
BRANCHES
.DEFECT
Poor taper
Bow,sweep
Codominantstforks
Multiple attachments
Included bark
Excessive end weight
Cracks/splits
Hangers
Girdling
Woundstseam
Decay
Cavity
45;:;
Conks/mushroomstbracket
Bleedingisap flow
Looselcracked bark
Nesting hole� hive
Deadwood/stubs
Borers/termites/ants
Cankers/clalls/buds
Previous failure
HAZARD RATING
Tree part most likely to fail: Failure potential: I - low, Z - medium: 3 - high: 4 - severe
Inspection period: annual biannual other Size of part 1 - <15" (15 cm); 2 - 6-1V (15-45 cm),-
3 - 18-30" (45-75 cm): 4 - >30" (75 cm)
Failure Potential + Size of Part. + Target, Rating Hazard RaItina Target rating: 1 - occasional use; 2 interminent use;
+ A07 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use
L
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Prune- 0 remove defective part D reduce end weight 13 crown clean 1:1 thin 11 raise canopy 0 crown reduce El restructure 0 shape'
Cableffirace: Inspect furdw. D root crown El decay 13 aerial 0 monitor
Remove tree:
1) N Replace? Y(
Mom target Y Other -
Effect on adjacent trees: ,�none 11 evaluate
Notification: 0 owner El mariager 0 governing agency Date:
COMMENTS
P/,orrnal Ochimotic mail
Foliage Color: rse Lea . f size: normal
Foliage density' Cl "I' Yl�a oor Twig DiebaW. e)N
growft 13 excellent 0 average KP(
Annualshout e [I poor 01�ne
WoundmW developrnent 0 excellent 0 averag
0 excellent 0 average fair 0 Poor
,jiW dasv.
Major pesWdiseases:
SITE CONDITIONS park [3 open space - 0 natural 0 wood'andfo"5L
0`r�sidence 0 commercial 0 industrial 0 [3 lawn 0 shrub border Z<nd break
Site Charadw. [3 raised bed [3 container [3 mound
Landscape type'- C' Park"'ay e C3 trunk wettled cle I aring C] site clearing
Inrigation: 0/none 0 adequate 0 Inadequate 0 excessivi change '0 line
,7,n nce
,�soil disturba
,u,a,c,.? CY )N cOnstrucfi N
-100% Pavement lifted? Y
Recent site di 50--15% 75
-25% 5-
OP/0 2 5
% dripline Paved: _Z5 50-75% 75-100%
10-25 75-50%
% dripline Vil fill Soil: 0% 25-50% SO-75% 75-10M all volume El disease c . enter, g;.H<cry of fall
% dripline grade lowere& cted [3 droughty 0 saline [3 alkaline .0 acidic 0 sm
Soil problems: 0 drainage 0 shallow 13 c0mP8 13 adjacent veg.
C3 clay [3 expansive 0 slQPe aspect ---- El,,ndergrvJnd utilities 0 traffic
gnage 0 line -of -sight 0 vieVV 0 overhead fines
obsuxidtions: 0 lights 0 si [3 recently exposed C] windward, ed - ge Zrarea prone to w1n(1ft0W
E] below canopy 13 above canopy
Exposuretowind: Osingletree 0ccu,-e=ofsnowficesWrms Unever OseldomUreg Ily
Prevailing wind direction:
u starmt,
13 curbipavement 0 guards
0 other
f TARGET C3 pedestrian 0 recTeation 0 landscape Cl hord5cal* 0 small teature5 L-1 UU—J-1 I
UseUnderTree: /building 013arking 0traffic
can use be restricted? Y 0 C"/
Can targelt bi6 MONO Y ,,ant use
Occupancy: 0 occasional use 0 interTro . ttent use 0 frequent use recof I nmendations derived from use of this form.
The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsib . ility for conclusions Or
TREE DEFECT'S
ROOTDEFECTS.- ---------
Suspect root rot
OY r4 mushroowconkroracket Resent Y N I D.-
Exposed roots: 0 severe 0 moderate
Root pruned- -11 Plow Underngrxxk 0 severe 11 moderate
�LL distance from trunk Root area affeM&. I % 80ress WOUnded:. Y N When:
Restricted root am: 0 severe 11 moderate 960,w Potential for root failure: [3 severe 12rm'aderate Ei low
LE"'
deg. fr0m vertical 01natural 11 unnatural 0 self -corrected Soil heaving: Y N
Decay in plane of lean: Y N Roots broken Y N Soil cracking: Y N
Con"Unding factors:
CROVMDEFECTS. Indicate presence of kyfiwtfi,:;1 rtaf�t� _4 Lean severity. 0 severe erate 0 low
rees in Urban Areas
A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard T
R HAZ4RD EVALUATION FORM2nd Edition
EE
Site/Address:
on:
ffiva unknown other
owner- public priva 42
ins
Date. ;Wiw� pector w'
Date last inspection:
TREE CHARAMR11b 1 3
1�11 I
KqZARD)ZATING:
, v-- - =
J��
----q —q—
railure +X Size 4 Target
Potent" of part Rating
Hazard
Rating
. immediate action needed
Needs further 0spection
Dead U"
-free Specim
Spre;:
DBK: # of Maiks.- ght
Form: 0 generally symmetric 0 minor asymmetry 0-m-ajor asymme" 13 stump sprout 11 . stag- . headed
Crown class: E3 dominant O<c-dominant 0 intermediate C1 suppressed
421 C3 semi -mature ;; �Mature 0 over-miaturelsenescent
L71vecrownratio: aul..% Age class: 0 young 0 cablearaced
Pruning WstorY- 11 cloned El excessively thinned D topped 0 crown raised 0 pollarded 0 crown reduced El flush cuts
,,. =one 0 multiple pruning even I is Approx. dates: [] street M [] screen 0 shade El indigenous 0 protected by gov. age,"
0 heritage/hitoric 0 wildlife 0 unusual
special Value; 13 specimen
TREE HEA I o chlorofir [I necrotic Fpicom lics? Y N Grawlhobstructlions:
Foliage color: norma F] normal 0 small j3 stakes 0 wir . effies 0 signs El cables
Foliage dens7ity @o'norrnal 0 sparse Leaf SiZe:
Annual shoot growth.. - 0 excellent Plaverage 13 poor Twig Dieback? Y N 0 curb/pavement 0 guards
Woundwood development 0 excellent 13 average 0 Poor 0-hone El other
Vigor claw. 0 excellent '.0average 0 fair 0 poor
Major pesLsidiseases:
SITE CONDITIUM 0 natural 0 woodiandWorest
site Character: � �residence 0 commercial [3 industrial 0 park 0 open space
11 shrub border 0 wind break
Landscapetype: 0 parkway -Erraised bed El container 0 mound 0 lawn
irrigatiom ��nwe 0 adequate El inadequate 0 excessive [3 trunk wettled
Recent site disturbance? (DIN [3 grade change 0 line clearing 0 site clearing
,O'conWuction - C3 soil disturbance 5% 75-100% Pavement lifted? Y N
00/0 10-25% C25L-�—_�17
• dripline paved: —
10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-100%
• dripline w/ fill soil: 622/0
• dripline grade lowered: 0% 10-25%1::��50-75% 75-10OP/o center ffs�sto
Soil proWems: 0 drainage 0 shallow 0 compacted 0 droughty 0 saline 0 alkaline 0 acidic 0 small volum . e 0 disease
0 clay 0 expansive 0 slope aspect:
obshWions; 0 lights 0 signage Oline-of-sight Oview 0overheadlines 0 underground utilities Otraffic Oadjacentveg. 0—
Expsuretowind: Osingletree Obelowcanopy Elabovecanopy 0 recently exposed 13-d-indward. canopy edge agre-a--pronetowindthrow
4� occurrenceofsnowlicestarms Onever Oselldom,�dy
prevailing wind direction:
TARGET Opedestrian Orecreation Olandscape Ohardscape osmalifeatures OutilitYlines
Use Under Tree: emQldi qj5&king 0 traffic
Can target be moved? Z� Can use be restricted? Y4�j)
0 intermittent use 0 frequent use e<ronstant use
occupancy. E3 occasional use
&ssumes no responsibillitY for conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form.
The International Society of Arboriculture
TREE DEFECTS
ROOT DEFECTS.*
Suspect root rut Cyl) N MushrowVWjkjbrdckgt present: Y N ID:
O��derate El low
Exposed roow. 0 severe O'moderate 0 low Undermined: 0 severe
Root pninved: 01- distance from trunk Root area affected.- Buttress wounded- Y N
derate 13 low Potential for root failure- 13 severe � 'moderate
Restricted roat area: E3 severe O'm'o
LEAN.-_ deg. from vertical 0 natural 0 unnatural 0 self -corrected Soil heaving: Y N
in 12 of lean: Y N Roots broken Y N Soil cracking: Y N
When:
0 low
LeansevaW. Osevere piiigerate Olow
Compounding factors: -14(
f qafwtc nntl rntp thPir cPVPri!V (s - severe. m - moderate, I = low)
OEFECT
ROOT CROWN
TRUNK
SCAFFOLDS
BRANCHES
Poor tap
Bow, swee@
Codominants/forks
Multiple attachments
bark
Included
Excessive end weight
Cracks/splits
Hangers
Girdling
Wounds/seam
Decay
Cav,
Conks/mushrooms/bracket
Bleeding/sap flow
Loose/cracked bark
Nesting holleffbee hi
Deadwood/stubs
Borershermites/an
Cankerstgalls/buris
Previous failure
HAZARD RATING of Failure potential: I - low, 2 - medium: 3 - high��Fere
Tree part most likely to fail: — Size o! pmt 1 - <6' (15 cm� . 18"(1545cm);
Inspection period: annual biannual — other .7 - >30" (75 cm)
3 - 18-30" (A )A
Failure Potential + Size of Part + Target Hazard Rating Target rating: i - occasional use: 2 intermittent use;
+ 3 - frequent use; 4 - constant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
R . une-- 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weight 0 crown clean 0 thin 0 raise canopy 0 crown reduce 0 restructure 0 shape
CablelBrace: inspectfurOw. Orootcrown Odecay Oaerial Omonitor
Remove treeG)N Replace? YO Move target Y other:
Effect on adjacent trees: ,P/none 0 evaluate
Notification: 0 owner 0 manager 0 governing agency Date:
a M11- Mr.
%f%P1V11V11L 1,j
A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas
ATIONFORM2nd Edition
TREE HAZARD EVALU
Site/AddresS:
MapfLocation: 't--J-6,4
owner public private unknown other
Date:
Date of last i6spectim
HAZARD RATING:
,
_q_ + +
Failure -i- Size +
Target
Hazard
Potential of part
Rating
Rating
immediate action needed
Needs hirther inspection
Dead tree
TREE CHARACTERISTICS
Tree #: Species:
DEH: # of bu*-%. �ight �,��Mp�rea&�
Form:Vgenerally metric 0 minor asymmetry 0 major asymmetry 0 stump sprout 0 stag -headed
crown chIST. dominant 0 co -dominant 0 interunediate 0 suppressed
Live cram ratio: _rD__ % Age class: eyoung 0 semi -mature . 0 irwiture 0 over-maturelsenescent
Prtsdng historT. 0 crown cleaned 13 excessively thinned 0 topped 13 crown raised 0 pollarded 0 crown reduced 0 flush cuts 0 cabled/braced
Ern�ne 0 multiple pruning events Approx. dates!
SWcial Value: 0 specimen 0 heritage/historic. El wildlife 0 unusual 0 street tree 0 screen 0 shade (3 indigenous 0 protected by gov. agency
TREE HEALTH
Foliagecolor: Onormal Ochloroft P-n-ecrotic Epicorrnics? yE� Gmwth obstn�ions:
Foliar density. 0 normal 99�arse Leal'size: Onormial 9"mall Ostakes Owireffies Osigns Ocables
Annual shoot gmwft 0excellent 0 average 11apoor Twiql)iet;�C� 0 cu"pavement 0 gwrds
,mwomood development: 0 excellent 0 avela
Ica
0
IMP EJMr&&S
c.
lagor dass: 0 excellent cellent average opoor Ocurbloaverrent "Ies
0 average E) fair Zrn-one 0 guards
Major Pests/diseases, ze zr.., &2�� 0 other —
S[TE CONINT10
site character. 7resklence
landscape type: ndustrial
laigation. Parkway 13 raised bed container Park CJ Open space CJ natural
none Cl adequate 0 inadequate C3 InOurid j3 lawn WOodlandvorest
Recent site digurbarice? 0 excessive Ij trunk w� 0 strub border P-W-in-d—break
11 dripline paved: . 'Q-C�;Wructian '.�S( il disturbance 0-'*-
96 dripline w/ fill so,,: 0 10-25,%10 25-:�5 qrade change 0 1
ia 50-75% 75-1 ine clearing El Site clearing
% dripline grade lowered. 00/0 10-25 2 !io% 00% Pavementlifted? y
09/0 70-25 �50% -"()-75% 75-70o%
SOUproblerns: Odrainage i3shallow % 25-5096 50-75% 75.1t)0%
0 compacted IJ droughty 0 saline 0 alkaline 0
13 clay 0 expansive 0 slope aspeM. acidic 0 small volume "di 'nler 11 hi5tory of fail
"e cL
dergn)und utilities
revailing wind directiorL C1 adjacent veg- [3
PExposwetDwind: osingletree obelowcanOPY 0abovecanopy Cl
obs"c'ions' r3lights 13signage oline-ofsight ov'ew 00verheadlines
Occtlr�enm Of Sr1OW/Xe st recerWy exposed El VWridward. canopy edge J2119ea
TARGET orms 13 never Seldom regularl Prone to Mndthrow
er Y
the Und Tree. ebuilding Oparking tj ............................................................................................................................. ....... R11111I, I
Can large, be 'a"'c 0 Pedestrian rmyeation ...........
n"md7 YC'�' Canuseberestricte&
_Qlandsca
occuPancy. 0 occasional use y Pe 11 hardscaM 0 sm
C1 intermittent use eatures 0 utilit 1,
The International Socie frequent use use I Y Ines
ly Of Arboriculture assumes no . rMponsibility for cOrldusions or
recom""Ctidations derived from use of this form.
Girdlinq
Wbunds/searn
cavity
,Conkslmushroom��et
Bleeding/sap now
Loose/cracked bark
Nesting holethee hive
Deadwood/stubs
BorerWtennitestants
Cankerstgalls/Wrls
1 Previous failure
A-V -
I
rIA-rUXIJ F%ni %3
Tree pad most likely to fail: TR
Failure potential: 1 - low, 2 - medium; 3 - high 7 s ere
�
Inspection period: — annual biannual other
�s
Size of part: I - 4' (15 2 - 6-10� cm;
Mo
Failure Potential + Size of Part + Target Frng =.Hazard Rating
3 -.18-30" (45-75 Cm); 4 - >30" (75 cm)
+ 0.-
+
.
Target rating: I - occasl I
ona u n.�Zvtermitten use;
3 - frequent us"stant use
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Prune: 0 remove defective part 0 reduce end weight 0 Crown clean 11 thin 0 raise canopy 0 crown reduce 0 restructur I e 0 shape.
Cable/Brace: ftsPed hu*w- 0 root Crown 0 decay El aerial 11 monitor
Remove tree.-G) N Replace? Y 0 Move target Y Dow -
Effect on adjacent trees. 0 none 0 evaluate
Notification: 0 owner 0 manager 0 governing agency Date:
COMMENTS
TREE DEFECTS
ROOTDEFECTS.
Suspectrootroe LY11 Mushroom1conktracket present: Y N 113-
Exposed roots: 0 severe 13 moderate Pr row Undermined-. 0 severe
13 moderate ETrow.
Root pruned: distance from trunk Root area aflecte& % Buthim
wounded; When:
y1p
Restricted root are& 11 seyere 0 moderate J21ow Potential fof root failure:
)2`5evere 0 moderate 0 low
LEAN. — deg. from vertical 0 natural 0 unnatural 0 self -corrected
Soil heaving: Y N' -7
Decay in plane of lean: Y N Roots b'ok Y N Soil cracking: Y N
Compounding factors: L
Lean severity- 0 severe 0 moderate 0 low
CROWNDEFECTS. Indicate presffence of in -di all defects and rsl�lr severitv Is severe. m = rnndprntp I - Irm)
DEFECT
Poor taper
ROOT CROWN
TRUNK
kmwws
BRANCHES
Bow, sweep
Codominants/forks
Multip a attachments
IGI
Included bark
Excesstve end wei(iht
Craqw.splits
Hangers
Girdling
'Abunds/seam
Cavity
Conkslmushrooms/br;;��
Bleeding/sap flow
Loose/cracked bark
Nesting hobbee hive
Deadwood/stubs
Borers/termiteslants
CankersMalls/burls
Previous failure
I Aff F% M I
RECEIVED
Critical Areas Checklist'
MAR - 5'2601
i Site Information DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF
EDMONDS
Project Name: n dcn?ct - (Te,6 y es 5.*hermit Number.
Site Location: �'-4 Property Tax Account Number./_3A 70 3 vvor.
14A#14
Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): /—dA*. APQ -5b,1( 90 46AR.
Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? _141�99
General Site Conditions
1. Has the site be= cleared or logged? -4 dy Date of most recent action: _1397,Z -
Soils / Topography
2. In the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)? 1X/
3. Describe the gencral.site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site.
A R Ring: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a
horizontal distance of 66 feet.)
--JEIIY.- slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30Yo a vertical rise
of 10 feet of horizontal distance.)
__;stccp: grades of grcAter than 30% present on site.
Comments -,A ka v;W tw;Z CA
Hydrology/Vegetation.
4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water
S. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. --Approx. Depth:
6- Site is in the floodway floodplain &^o of a water course-
7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? C r-ro/flows-
are year-round? --,Y—Flows are seasonal?
8. Site is primarily: forested - meadow shrubs mixed
9. Obvious wetland is present on site:
10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site:
11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site:
�o
reas:*
NU1--UUNAL--*�-.W- V_kK:--'.U61ddJ4
Ah
2
ey 3/27 n*'
Date
f
0
CITY OF
EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works * Planning - Parks and Recreation * Engineering
'( 8 9 0 . " 9 14 -
April 29, 1994
Ray Johnson
133 Lip Lip Lane
Norland, WA 98358
RE: - Critical Areas Study for Cedric Lyndsay
Dear Mr. Johnson:
"T
LAURA M. HALL
MAYOR
The city of Edmonds has received and approved your proposal for a critical areas study
for the property owned by Cedric Lyndsay located north of Water Street on Sound View
Place. The three party contract has been approved and signed by all parties. Therefore,
work is authorized to progress according to the scope of work that you proposed. The
proposed budget is $450.00. If your work exceeds $450.00 you will need to submit an
amended proposal, and a new three party contract will need to be approved. All billings
should be directed to the City of Edmonds Planning Division. I have attached a copy of
the proposal and the contract for your convenience. I will be out of the office from May
2, 1994 through May 20, 1994. If you need any assistance during that time, Jeff Wilson
will be able to assist you.
Sincerely,
John Bissell
Planning Division.
Inm!-porniod Augiist 1 l,'1890
7
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING DIVISION
July 8, 1993
TO: JEFFREY S. WILSON AICP, CURRENT PLANNING SUPERVISOR
FROM: JOHN BISSELL AICP, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN
SUBJECT: CRITICAL AREAS STUDY REQUIRED AT 18803 SOUND VIEW Pl. (CA-93-75)
Cedric E. Lindsay has submitted a critical areas checklist for lots "A" and "B" of subdivision # S-6-72.
The lots are not addressed, but are found west and north west of 18916 Sound View Place. Fruitdale
Creek passes in-between Lot "A" and lot "B". The stream is mapped on the Critical Areas Map and is
labeled as a class 2 stream with salmonids. A class 2 stream with salmonids requires a 50 foot buffer
from the top of the bank of the stream and a 15 foot building setback from the edge of the buffer.
ECDC 20.15B. 150 requires a study if a critical area or the buffer of a critical area is found on the
property. In this case, Fruitdale Creek is defined as a critical area. Therefore a study must be required.
ECDC 20. ISB. 150 also requires that when a study is required, the applicant shall enter into a three party
contract with the City and a consultant qualified to perform the study.
Since the City understands that this is a class 2 stream with salmonids, the requ ired study will only need
to be for location purposes. Therefore the following scope of work is required prior to the issuance of
any building permits, any development permits, and prior to any construction or development of the site:
1. The top of each bank of the stream shall be located and mapped by a licensed land surveyor.
2. The fifty foot buffer measured from the top of each bank of the stream shall be mapped by a
licensed land surveyor
3. A legal description for each fifty foot buffer is to be prepared by a licensed land surveyor.
4. The fifteen foot building setback shall he mapped by a licensed land surveyor.
5. A native growth protection easement, prepared in a form acceptable to the City Attorney of the
City of Edmonds, is to be recorded for the area defined and legally described as the fifty foot
stream buffer areas.
If you concur with these conditions, please indicate your concurrence below
r
890 199
July 15, 1993'
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS. WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation e Engineering
Cednic Lindsey
744 Point Whitney Road
Brinnon WA 98320
RE: Critical Areas Rcview # CA-93-75
Dear Mr. Lindsey:
LARRY S. NALIGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
The City has reviewed your critical areas checklist and made a site inspection of the property. This review
revealed a class two stre,1111 with silmonids passing through (fie property. A class two stream is classified
as a critical area requiring a fifty foot buffer. According to the Critical Areas Ordinance, if a critical area
is found on (lie property, a study is required to identify the type. si7e. and location of the critical area, the
critical area buffer. and the required building setbacks.
Therefore a study is required for your property. The study niust be conducted by a licensed land surveyor
through a three party contract with the property owner. the City and the land surveyor. I have included a
nicino which describes the scope of the work required for the study.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate (o contact nie at this office.
Sincerely.
John Bissell, AICP
Associate Planner
cc. File # CA-93-75
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 e
Sister Cities International — Hekinan. JaDan
It? C. 1 S 913
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Letter of Transmittal
Date: December 9, 2003
To: WA State Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
PO'Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Subject: 18916 Soundview Pl., Edmonds (PC-03-481)
Transmitting Determination of Nonsignificance and
Environmental Checklist
For Your Information: X
As you requested:
For your file:
Comment:
Note attachments: X
Cc: AT&T Broadband
Dept. Of Fish,& Wildlife
BNRR
Tom Braaten Construction, Inc.
Sincerely,
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
of ED4f 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
St. I
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2 1 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to considerthe environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
NOTE: Projects generating new traffic will be required to submit a Traffic Study prepared by a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
Specific requirements for the Traffic Study may vary depending upon the project, and will be provided by the City Engineer upon
request. Please contact the Engineering Division at 425-771-3202 for specific study requirements. City review of the Traffic Study
may require assessment of the "Development Project Peer Review" fee of $45 plus the cost of the review.
Use of checklistfor nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete
the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonpr6ject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and, 11property or site" should be read as
toproposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: Nauss- -1-o '? r- -R,) 1 cr A-r:
2. Name of applicant:
3.
Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
60 JQ �:-r P, e-T-WJ I
Page I of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.192W I
Zoo 7
4. Date checklist prepared: 17- 57 - :1,
5. Agency requesting checklist: City ofEdmonds
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ?\-r 60 AJ5 TV vcT-( cLJ
-Zoo+
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do youbave any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
(STAFF COMMENTS
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
�JAA
(STAFFCOMMENTS)C!rij'-A;=. ,—.A
. I . r -
= . i - -4= nm- - e-it - I L4 fa JL� V--Irll ;IQ; I t�
Lan:c
D L., Lc A
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 2 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18-2001
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
(STAFF
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
\'?'j I ct� P CA-F- PA A I L X 1b V,:JC-EL A
0 T;+ e F(-�o Paf-� Ax-r-
I F3 9 1 \J I 5-vi - fl- TO 5- -*PC- 0 fALry
le
Q al�,'
(STAFF COMMENTS) -J+ 4-
A, nL
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, a6d range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any pern-dt applications related
to this checklist.
Ad 6 At6 S, WA
5fel- 13 TW 2-7 NJ k&/6, 3 E WA
L o-r',,. >iylsiad
(STAFF COMMENTS) V-1-ft e-4- )(A 0,1-n 'k
Page 3 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle��ollfflg, U14���ountainous, other:
-A N 0-4, 7- yo :5 L- 0 f6- A:r *9V1u11N(- PA'I>
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know
the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
"SAAAY Z-661A Aix w'T(4 e,�Ay
(STAFF COMMENTS
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe._
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 4 of 24
sepa checklist - public.dw.4.19.20DI
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.: Indicate source
of fill.
w1a wtLL i3r-- 69-A�i" Af Aux. If-() Yhf-Ps -F0
t 0S1--A77LL- 14 15-7 EO VN66--010)'J &t)� 7-ge pir-T- w t Lj,,
Pa PI-AmT:> o�i oic 54-itwiz.,A) WgEo e-04orrFE,
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
M sTA L-(,- S 1416 (IT n5we-las 11-i
�J
(STAFF COMMENTS
2. AER
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial
wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and,give
approximate quantities if known.
13U L L 0 A&D -1?6�40r- F�& Pr 6SW hA 5.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page'5 of 24
scpa checkfin - public.doc:4.18.2001
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
0
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control enuissions or other impacts to the, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
YC-!5 A mAu- 5RFAik wil-jl A +0
1?U tALo 6Ct"?Ack— t4A)E vw-�
PI) &C,-r 4 OV-AJA I
(STAFF COMMENTS) Q f—= i=-- Ase-V- AS !!��n x:k42j! Qckd Pt jQ.=�
V-Anx I fc!'f-&—c-m— 1-4u 1 - —Fm 64 AS
t5' 47qo— Q?-4� --A--0-
(2)' Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
45115 0- rrO PIAA]
(STAFF COMMENTS) P?5u tx>j,--i6 0. w
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or, removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material. I
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 6 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
tj o
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
ago
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 7 of 24
sepa checkEst - pubfic.doc:4.18.2001
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? . Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe. 7
:5 �b MIA/44, F_ ?S'rgAl
Lj 0 e, E_'T
(2)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
41A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 8 of 24
scpa chmkfist - public.doc:4.18.2001
4. Plants
a.
Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, ot her:.
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
I/ shrubs
V grass
Dasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,'skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other:
other types of vegetation:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
'D4-16-1
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 9 of 24
sepa diecklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
jot b a -)-3 LAttb5c-A fitj�- govtw;�, jj t.,j - doy se -
(STAFF COMMENTS) tjo Q-A-4C-Q--)'L ek j- agu= C:2te 2>�%
_Q .9
5. Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds<!�ip--!5i�> �U
manunals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. . List any threatened or endangered species known to be, on or near the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
0
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 10 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. . Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Z_
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, ge nerally
describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page I I of 24
sepa checklist - public.dDc:4.18.2001
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
(STAFF COMMENTS
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
WA
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 12 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site.
cmu
11)49 :2204
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
N I
(STAFF
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS
M-1
Page 13 of 24
se pa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
C. Describe any structures on the site.
-U
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site9
A -
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS)!Z,,nt—��
Page 14 of 24
sepa chcckhu - pubfic.doc:4.19.2001
I
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
h LAj rr4k a +o A4 b
(STAFF
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
(STAFF COMMENTS
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
4�h 44OL&W5
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 15 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NIA
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
(STAFF COMMENTS) Qc's' " '-" d- -
Page 16 of 24
sepa checklist - public doc-4 18 2001
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or -glare may affect your proposal?
&
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 17 of 24
sepa chwkfist - pubfic.doc:4.18.2001
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
2. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are ifi the immediate vicinity?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
�Jb
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to, reduce or controi impacts 'on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 18 of 24
sepa checklist - pubfic.doc:4.18.2001
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklist - pubfic.doc:4.18.2001
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
P�b
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How manywould the project eliminate?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or stree ts, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
+ 90 F94-'TY 1-4jviE- I -%
rZ� :JA n�*F,
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 20 of 24
sepa checklist - pubhc.doc:4.18.2001
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
7 77
(STAFF COMMENTS
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 21 of 24
sepa checklist - pubfic.dDc:4.18.2001
16. Utilities
a. Circle jQLtilities currently available at the site:
rsanitary sewer-3 septic system, other:
CAEL4F- -7-V
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
make its decision.
Signature of Proponent
Date Submitted
Page 22 of 24
sqm d=Wist - public.doc:4.18.2001
M
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheetfor project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to re ad them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,
would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate tharl if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Nt
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
'-J1A
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natpral resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Page 23 of 24
sepa checklist - public.doc:4.18.2001
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Z
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
MY
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
40 cc Aj rL 16r
Page 24 of 24
sepa checkhst - public.doc:4.18.2001
'11\1. - -
16702
Iffm ST SW
ISM
18711
lowl I B828
18701
Ae
18704
10715 18711
6717
IBM
18719
Ime
Ion
19717 16719
10715 IBM
IM5
IBM ism
&912d
I
18812
ism
leall
-
18814 lesio
16732 --ism
A
18809 18812
18809
>
ism ISW4
leele ism
18823 18824
18823
lam
ISO
AV A
ISBW27
18817
'8823
1-9
1— 1aa12
z
ia9C2 169D4 ISM
18831
1 am
1 910
CL
lawl
Ism
ISBN 169M
Ism
ism
�1883
189 2 189DB
0
16906
Et
1 .
IB914
0 0 0
16910 16914
10915
18911
—
IBM
loon 18914
ism
19012 Ism
18916
Ia922
9421
8313
16924
0921
-7
lom
I ST Ow
WA-iiF
ST
9636 9616
19011
. ...... ;—
19006
19013 9015
9425
9=
OWS
9210
9MI
19018
1901
9719 9711 9611
—
19016
19107
19011
lome
O�BM29 9619 9811
9715 9609 19a2O
19016
PE SIV
19024
CbWRFR1Y
19025
1621
19105
19102
A
19102
0303
19110
19105
loll
1620
1610
19117 19121
19120
77S
SM 19124
loll
19130 121.
1661
E
19126
lue
'9129 19125
1912
1596 16M
1551 1542 10210
7
19204
ism
150
cc
a
91
19210
9116
low
19213
I w
1592
19212 19214
1
1560
19226
IL
lom
19218 19222
3:
19210
19211
19215
1520
f
— —
0
cc
19225
1540
19226
8
19226 19230
19220 92
19232
19226
1
.10
'9231
1530
1141,
1506
1020
19316
9309 19311
lum
1520
1515
1 14
1429 1002
!e
2 i i
9509
ism
9515
1514
1401 1420
FOFIEST DELL OR
-
1030 1449 M2
ow
le
1422
A
9520 1426
9065
1036
1439 1450
14
9125
1432
1010 1010
1420 143D
1427
1428
1023
1430
1421
1016
1420 1020 1031
1440
1416 1109
19516
------
1422
1043
1428 1417
62?
1416 1030
pf
14M
13M
1424 1047
1412
19510
304
Sundstone 41 11302
1403
1410 . .
19515
19511
1
414 1
1405
1011 1055 1407
19520
1409
1400
P
1
19524
910 912
1324
1323
ON
914
1315
1312 1313
R
90o
918 Edmonds
R IW9
9
1 M
1304 1305
1308 1305
3]
PUGET WA Elementant
0
0
4
C<)
L
0
6evc. rim
Fit--TW F"X-e--
A
-rwme ALu gooF
4 11 a-0
AqP PR\1raWAr qzAI45..
16.,
IV/ ,
ALJ- E905,00 4e,,3Tw(, tleAsoocc.
"& MOST Er,
10 FILAC4-- AFjr,, jpSFee,-r&4:> prjog -r, A,,,f
OK ez*JS-rgUc-T,,,.N. -
OATIO
ft6fM4ca, m
XXX BOUND VIEW rLAL,, e
EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNTr
5CALE 1:20
; 41
�%ltj FLecr- 29-104
UrMv- F-m $405
TorrAt.
r;f7*7 rr
4,a-"6&
1400 Fr
PoUp pleno" 1>0's ipq. $1
ge I (>14-r cAL'e,",
A
co
17
C.P- To-l-
0
A
C EK
L NE
11reWIMPS AROA 4MC6.
9&9vow-a
4512 4,qf:-r
DFavalJOY
14-5s --Icp f-r
rA-ro
sss " P-r
roTAt.
&llos aqFT
Larr ARNA
zs&ow,
96 to-irsevoo.&
leo. ol
- .11. �.", 7 Z. �. -. I �,
3 2003
7Tf I -TK 7 Ar-tv'b
IL c kyr,
31 l-EF9MIT COUNTER
E
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: Construction of New Single -Family Residence (See Attached Site Plan)
Proponent: Tom Braaten Construction
Locatl , on of proposal, including street address if any: 18916 Soundview Place
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and
mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive
plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or.federal laws or rules, as
provided by RCW 43.21 C.240 and WAC 197-11-158
An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made
after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
xx This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14,
days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 26, 2003.
Responsible Official: -Robert Chave
Position/Title: Manager - Planning Division
Phone: 425-771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: 43 - 0,�� Signature:-
xx You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at. 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than December 26, 2003, by submitting a written
appeal with the required appeal fee and citing the reasons for the appeal.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
xx Posted on December 9. 2003, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community
Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
xx Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse. side of this form, along with a copy of the
Checklist.
Pagel of2
VOETMANN SEPA DETEPMINATIONDOC
12/9/03.SEPA
9 1 1
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX Burlington Northern Railroad
XX Environmental Review Section
2900 Bond
Department of Ecology
Everett, WA 98201
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX Applicant: Tom Braaten,
Tom Braaten Construction Inc.
XX AT&T Broadband
3443 Evergreen Pt. Rd.
Ouside Plpnt Engineer, North Region
Medina, WA 98039
20811 84 Ave. S., Suite 101
Kent, WA 98032
XX Department of Fish & Wildlife
16018 Mill Creek Boulevard
Mill Creek, WA 98012 ,
Attachments
pc: File No. PC-03-481
SEPA Notebook
Page 2 of 2
VOETMANN SEPA DETERMINATION. DOC
12/9/03.SEPA
APR-11-2003 FRI 12:50 PM FAX NO. P. 03
-1A
-Alf 3
To tile City (if Fdmonds: Ca
This is a request for a vacation ofa portion of a City of Edirionds Storm Sewer EascmcfiV,-,'VTE.,,P,
To be rcplac�;d with a new stonu sewer casernent, dedicatc(i to the City of Ednionds.
Legal description of the 10 foot wide slorni sewer easement, recording No. 2244215, to
be vaca(ed, said easuincrit is located across Lot B, city or Ednionds Lot Line Adjustuient
No. LL-2000-74, and recoided under Snohomish County Recording No. 200009275007.
'I'llat pollion of said storm sower easument lying Morthwestcrly of the following
do-scribcd fine.:
l3cginning it tile Southwest corner of said Lot B;
flwitceSoulh52 43'00" East, along I lie Southwesterly line of said Lot A, 110.00fect;
thenceNorth 88 33' 00" East 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of said line;
thenco Not-1107 17' 00" East 50.00 fee(;
thumuNorlh 58 10' 55" Fast 20 fect,moreor less, tothe'SOL[thbank of the existiTIL'
streammid end orsaiti iine.
The vacited storm sewer casernent across a portion of said Lot 13, as described above, to
he replaccd by the following described 10 foot wide storni sewer easenicnt,,
'I'l lilt port i oil of sl id Lot B, City o rEdmorids Lot Line Adi ustment No. LL-2000-74,
RecordingNo. 200009275007, described as follows:
TheNouthwesterly 20 fect on width of said Lot B, EXCEPT theNorthwesterly 10
feet thucof, ALSO fliatportion of said Lot B describedas follows: ,
llogiiiningat the Southwest corner of said Lot B;
lhencQ South 52 43' 00" aast 20,00 feet to (lie Trite Point of Beginning;
thence contliming South 52 43' 00" East 90.00 feet;
thence North 83 33' 00" Fast 15.98 feet;
llicnce Noillt 52 43' 00" West 102.47 feet to a point 20.00 feet Southwesterly of
the Northwesterly line of said Lot B;
thoricc South 37 17' 00" West 10.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
From inforrrialion gained froni the City of Ednionds, the portion of the Storrn Sewer
Elascinunt that is king requested vacatcd, hasnevCT been maintained by the City.
The owner of Lot 11, installcd and maintained the existing storin sewer that is located in
lite 1'�aseincnt that is being asked to be vacated, and agrees to replace and maintain tile
F111111-C storill sewer within (lie new proposed Storm Sewer Hasernent, and to replace the
storin sewer per City of Ednimids rcgul. ions.
KOWIler Lot 11 4,0 �" A ,
Cedric Li nd say (3 60) 796 - 42 76
744-Point Whitney Road
cc:llill Scilion (Lindsay repmsentative(425)672-1118) Brinnon, WA 98320
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY -RESIDENCE
18916 SOUNDVIEW PLACE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
RECEIVE:D
..E . -10934 92004
FEB:
PERMIT C'OUNTER
January 23, 2004
PREPARED FOR
TOM BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION
'#"Nolmov
866i�-e. Meg<
Stpjt�q' IJ
.'q gist
01
4F
33182
7,, /L Y) NA - W4 11Z310q
Kristina M. Weller, P.E.
Project Manager,
Earth Consultants, Inc.
1805-136 th Place Northeast, Suite 201.
Bellevue, Washington.'98005
(425) 643-3780
Toll Free 1-888-739-6670
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
ABOUTYOUR
GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEERING REPORT
More construction problems are caused by site subsur-
face conditions than any other factor As troublesome as
subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent
have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in
large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/
The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in
the Geosciences.
The following suggestions and observations are offered
to help you reduce the geotech n ical -related delays.
cost -overruns and other costly headaches that can
occur during a construction project.
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIOUE SET
OF PROJECT -SPECIFIC FACTORS
A &otechnical engineering report is based on a subsur-
face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique
set of project -specific factors. These typically include:
the general nature oTiffi—estructure involved, its size and
configuration; the location of the structure on the site
and its orientation; physical concomitants such as
access roads. parking lots, and underground utilities,
and the level of additional risk which the client assumed
by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory
program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the
geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors
which change subsequent to the date of the report may
affect its recommendations.
Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates
otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not
be used:
• When the nature of the proposed structure is
changed, for example, if an office building will be
erected instead of a parking garage. or if a refriger-
ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre-
frigerated one;
• when the size or configuration of the proposed
structure is altered:
• when the location or orientation of the proposed
structure is modified;
• when there is a change of ownership, or
• for application to an adjacent site.
Geotechn ical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems
which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid-
ered in their report's development have changed. -
MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS"
ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface �conclitions
only at those points where samples are taken, when ;
they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub-
sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo-
technical engineers who then render an opinion about
overall subsurface conditions,, their likely reaction to
proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda-
tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual
conditions may differ from those inferred to exist,
because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how
qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no
matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by
earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate-
rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report
indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may
differ from predictions. Nothing can -be done to prevent the
unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their
impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their
geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden-
tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be
needed, and to recommend solutions to problems
encountered on site.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
CAN CHANGE
Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly -
changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi-
neering report is based on conditions which existed at
the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions
should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose
adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo-
technical 'Consultant to learn if additional tests are
advisable before construction starts.
Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and
natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground-
water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions
and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical
report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept
apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to
determine if additional tests are necessary
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE
PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
AND PERSONS
Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet
the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre-
pared for a �onsdlting civil engineer may not be ade-
quate for a construction contractor, or even some other
consulting civil engineer Unless indicated otherwise,
this report was prepared expressly for the client involved
and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use
by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client
for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi-
,vidual otherthan the client should apply this report for its
intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical
enyinel�'r. No person 'Should apply1his �report for any purpose
other than that originally contemplated without first conferring
with the oeotechnical engineer
r^,;,,k1Earth Consultants, Inc.
(;vx)iwhnra1 Fngnecrs, Gmlo�flsls& h1wirol I] I willal Skiclifisis,
C01)S1111C1i01)T(Sfi119 & 10io / %A'Aly)
January 23, 2004
Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
Dear Mr. Braaten:
Established 1975
E-1 0934
Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) is pleased to submit this report titled, "Geotechnical
Engineering Study, Proposed Single -Family Residence, 18916 Soundview Place,
Edmonds, Washington". This report presents the results of our field exploration,
selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses.
In general, our field explanation indicates the site is underlain by medium dense to very
dense silty fine to medium sand with gravel. Based on our study, in our opinion, the
proposed residence can be supported on a conventional foundation system bearing on
competent native soil or structural fill. Slab -on -grade floors can be similarly supported.
ECI appreciates this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or
need further assistance, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC.
ezm�ae,�
Kristina M. Weller, P.E.
Project Manager
SSR/SDD/KMW/csm
1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E-10934
UATei 4
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
General......................................................................................................... 1
Project Description ........................................................................................ 2
SITE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 2
Surface......................................................................................................... 2
Subsurface................................................................................................... 3
Groundwater................................................................................................. 4
LaboratoryTesting ........................................................................................ 4
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 5
General........................................................................................................ 5
Site Preparation and General Earthwork ............................................................ 5
Foundations.................................................................................................. 7
Slab -on -Grade Floors ...................................................................................... 8
RetainingWalls ............................................................................................. 8
Seismic Design Considerations ........................................................................ 9
GroundRupture ........................................................................................ 9
Liquefaction......... .................................................................................... 9
Ground Motion Response .......................................................................... 10
Excavations and Slopes ................................................................................. 10
SiteDrainage ............................................................................................... 11
Utility Support and Backfill ............................................................................ 11
LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................... 12
AdditionalServices ....................................................................................... 12
Earth Consultants, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Continued
E-10934
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan
Plate 3 Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill
Plate 4 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail
APPENDICES
Appendix A Field Exploration
Plate Al Legend
Plates A2 through A4 Test Pit Logs
Appendix B Laboratory Test Results
Plates 131 Grain Size Analyses
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
18916 SOUNDVIEW PLACE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
E-10934
INTRODUCTION
General
This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by
Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed single-family residence, 18916
Soundview Place, Edmonds, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on
the Vicinity Map, Plate 1.
The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site and,
based on the conditions encountered, develop geotechnical recommendations for the
proposed site development. Our scope of services included an evaluation of the
following:
Site geologic setting, including a description of the subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions and their influence on the proposed development;
Grading, earthwork, fill compaction, drainage, cut and fill slopes, stripping,
proofrolling, and other site development recommendations;
A description of suitable fill soils, as well as the suitability of the on -site -soils
for use as fill;
Design criteria for shallow foundations including minimum width and depth
requirements and allowable design bearing pressures for shallow footings;
0 Depth of frost penetration and effect; and
0 Seismic design parameters.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 2
Project Description
ECI understands it is planned to re -develop the site by demolishing the existing single-
family residence and replacing it with a new residence. The new residence will have a
larger footprint than the existing building, but will maintain the same grades as much
as possible. At the time this study was performed, the site, proposed residence and
our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan,
Plate 2.
Based on our experience with similar projects, anticipated wall loads for the proposed
residence will be in the range of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot, column loads in the range of
10 to 20 kips, and slab -on -grade floor loads of 150 pounds per square foot (psf).
We anticipate the proposed residence will be constructed near existing site grades
using a crawl -space basement, and/or a slab -on -grade floor with cuts and fills of less
than five feet.
If the above project description is incorrect or the project information changes, ECI
should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make
modifications, if needed.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The subject site is located at 18916 Soundview Place, Edmonds, Washington (see
Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The site is roughly rectangular in shape, with an area of
approximately one-half acre. The site is currently developed with an abandoned single-
family residence surrounded by a yard and landscaping. The site is bordered to the
north and east by developed residential parcels, to the south by a residential parcel and
access street frontage, and to the west by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
railroad line. 1;
The site is vegetated with a mixture of grass landscaping and sparse trees.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEtRING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction
January 23, 2004
E-1 0934
Page 3
The existing topography slopes very gently to the west, with approximately five feet of
elevation change across the width of the site. There is a creek channel that trends
east,to west along the northern site boundary. The channel elevation is approximately
ten feet below the developed portion of the site. There is a bluff along the western
site boundary that descends approximately ten feet to the BNSF line.
Suhqwfarp
Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating three test pits at the site to a
maximum depth of nine feet below existing grades at the approximate locations shown
on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A4, for a more detailed
description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of
the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized
description of the subsurface conditions encountered.
At all our test pit locations, approximately four inches of topsoil was encountered. The
topsoil was characterized by its dark brown color and organic content. Under no
circumstances should the topsoil be used as, or mixed into, structural fill.
Underlying the topsoil, in all our test pit locations, medium dense, grading to very
dense, silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM) was encountered
extending to the maximum exploration depth of nine feet.
Review of the geologic map for the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West
Quadrangles indicates the site is immediately underlain by Olympia Gravel deposits.
These deposits are characterized by fluvial sands and gravels with localized oxidation
and cementation, deposited prior to the Fraser Glaciation.
Our field exploration generally correlates with this geologic designation.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 4
Groundwater
No groundwater seepage was encountered at the time of the subsurface exploration,
(December 2003). Based on the limited amount of grading required to achieve footing
elevation, groundwater seepage is not anticipated to adversely impact site
development. However, the contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not
static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of
rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher,
and seepage rate is greater, in the wetter fall and winter months (typically October
through May).
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or
modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and
engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were
supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content
tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on
specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual
test pit logs, or on a separate data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to
note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in -situ soil
conditions. Geotechnical recommendations provided in this study are based on
interpretation of these test results. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of
these data by others.
In accordance with the Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples
for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion
of this report unless directed otherwise in writing.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 5
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of this study, in ECI's opinion, the proposed residence can be
constructed generally as planned. Support for the new residence can be provided using
a conventional spread and. continuous footing foundation system bearing on competent
native soil or structural fill. Competent native soil, capable of providing adequate
support for the residence, was encountered at approximately 18 inches below existing
grades. Slab -on -grade floors can be similarly supported. Any organic or unsuitable
soils encountered during the excavation for the building foundation, pads or walkways
should be removed and replaced with a granular structural fill.
This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a
manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other
members of the profession currently practicing under similar. conditions in this area for
the exclusive use of Tom Braaten Construction and their representatives. No warranty,
expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the
project contract documents for the information of the contractor.
Site Preparation and General Earthwork
The building area should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic matter,
existing structures and other deleterious material. The existing concrete foundation
can be used as structural fill provided it is reduced to a maximum grain size of four
inches and that it is mixed with other moisture conditioned granular soils prior to
placement.
Following the stripping operation, a representative from ECI should observe the ground
surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed. Soil in
loose or soft areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should be overexcavated and
replaced with a granular structural fill. A woven geotextile fabric may also be used to
stabilize the overexcavation surface. For this application, a woven geotextile such as
Mirafi 60OX or an equivalent material can be placed directly on the subgrade. The
geotextile should be used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction
January 23, 2004
E-1 0934
Page 6
Any organic -rich soils exposed during excavations that will be under structural
elements such as foundations, building pads or pavement/walkway areas, are not
suitable for building support and will require removal and replacement with an approved
granular, non -organic structural fill.
There are several existing underground utility lines beneath the site. Underground
utilities that will be abandoned should be plugged or removed and replaced with
structural fill.
Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, floor slabs,
pavements, or other load -bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs, footings and
pavements should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in
loose thickness. Fill placed under footings should be compacted to 90 percent of
maximum density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-91 (Modified Proctor)
except for the top twenty-four (24) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of
maximum dry density. Fill placed under slabs -on -grade, pavements, and walks should be
compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches
which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density.
During dry weather, most granular soils, which are compactable and non -organic, can
be considered for use as structural fill. Based on the results of laboratory tests, the
native silty sand with gravel soils, at the time of our exploration, appear to be near or
above their optimum moisture content. Due to the fines content of the on -site soils,
they are moderately moisture sensitive and may degrade rapidly if exposed to moisture
and heavy traffic. Therefore, moisture conditioning of the on -site soil may be
necessary prior to use as structural fill depending on the conditions at the time of
placement. Laboratory testing indicates the native silty sand with gravel soils have
moisture contents in the range of 3 to 9 percent.
If imported structural fill is necessary, a non -organic, compactable, granular soil with a
maximum grain size of four inches can be considered for use during dry weather
conditions. Fill for use during wet weather or in wet subgrade conditions should
consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum grain size of four
inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus
3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be included for this
possibility.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 7
Fmind.qtinnQ
The proposed residence should be supported on a conventional spread and continuous
foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. Concrete slabs can
be similarly supported. Competent native soil capable of providing adequate foundation
support was encountered at approximately 18 inches below existing grade.
Loose or organic soil encountered during site grading activities that will be under
structural areas such as the building foundation, pavement and walkways, should be
removed and replaced with a granular structural fill as necessary. An ECI
representative should be on -site during the foundation excavation operations to assess
subgrade conditions.
Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18)
inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a
minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, or on competent soils
exposed in the crawl space surface. Continuous and individual spread footings should
have minimum widths in accordance with applicable building codes.
'i
With foundation suoport obtained as described, an allowable soil bearing capacity of
two thousand five hundred (2,500) psf can be used for design. Loading of this
magnitude would be provided with a theoretical factor -of -safety in excess of three
against shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in
the above allowable bearing capacities can be used.
With structural loading as expected, and provided the above design criteria is followed,
total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of
about three-quarters of one inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur
during construction as dead loads are applied.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction
January 23, 2004
E-1 0934
Page 8
Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the
supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the
foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent
native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.35
.can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using
an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor -of -safety of 1.5 has been
included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive
resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not
acceptable or the grade adjacent to the foundation is steeper than 5H:1V
(Horizontal:Vertical).
Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms
or rebar, to verify that soil conditions are as anticipated in this report.
Slab -on -Grade Floors
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on competent native soil or structural fill.
Loose or unstable subgrade soil must be either recompacted or over -excavated and
replaced with structural fill.
The slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of four
inches of free -draining sand or gravel. A vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic
membrane should be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be
placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the
concrete.
Retaining Walls
Retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the
retained soils. Walls that are designed to*yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth
pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. If
walls are to be, restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight
should be increased to fifty (50) pcf. These values are based on horizontal backfill and
the assumption that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic,
structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are
to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The foundation
bearing, passive pressure, and friction *coefficients previously provided in the foundation
section are applicable to retaining walls.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction
January 23, 2004
E-1 0934
Page 9
To reduce the potential for hydrostatic forces building up behind the walls, retaining walls
should be backfilled with a column of suitable free -draining material such as pea gravel or
washed rock extending at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of
the backfill should consist of structural fill. A perforated drain pipe should be placed at
the base of the wall and should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal
foot with three -eighths inch pea gravel. The perforated pipe should consist of a rigid,
smooth wall pipe such as schedule 40 PVC or SDR 35 pipe. A typical retaining wall
backfill detail is attached as Plate 3.
Seismic Desiqn Considerations
The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in the 1997 Uniform Building Code
(UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity However, the majority
of these events are of such low magnitude they are not felt without instruments.
Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in
the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the
2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake in the Nisqually area.
There are three potential geologic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic
event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response.
Ground Rupture
The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events,
ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these
deep events has not been documented to date. In our opinion, the risk of ground
rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of
time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of
grain -to -grain contact and a rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to
behave as a fluid. To have potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with
a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sand and silt); it must be loose;
it must be below the groundwater table; and it'must be subject to sufficient magnitude
and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or
differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction
January 23, 2004
E-10934
Page 10
Due to the dense soil conditions and lack of a shallow groundwater table observed at
our test pit locations, in our opinion, the susceptibility to liquefaction -induced
settlement at this site is negligible.
Ground Motion Response
The 1997 UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic
force procedure for design -based shear calculations. Based on the soil conditions
encountered, it is our opinion soil profile type Sc, Very Dense So# or Soft Rock as
defined in Table 1 6-J should be used to characterize the native site soils.
Excavations and Slopes
The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no
circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming
responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such
responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred.
In no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state,
and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from field
exploration and laboratory testing, the soils encountered on this site would be classified
as Type B by OSHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type B soils
should be sloped at an inclination of 1H:1V. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter,
cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect
against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the
excavation. We can provide shoring recommendations, if needed.
Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes
should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as
anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to
improve stabi * lity, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface
drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of
slopes.
Permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of
vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 11
Site Drainage
Groundwater seepage was not observed at the time of our exploration (December
2003). However, if seepage is encountered, ECI should be contacted to provide
recommendations for groundwater control.
The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during
grading operations by ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if present,
may be more clearly defined.
During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is directed away
from the buildings. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings,
slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Loose surfaces should be sealed by
compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils.
Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The
ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet
away from the building, 'except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2
percent.
Footing drains should be installed around building perimeters at, or just below, the
invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is
provided on Plate 4. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be
connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined
to an approved discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow
for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems.
Utility Support and Backfill
The site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. Utility trench
backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility
alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility
line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand
tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be
carefully placed and hand tamped to about 12 inches above the crown of the pipe
before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench
backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12)
inches and compacted to the structural fill specifications detailed in this report, or
specifications required by the appropriate municipal codes.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 12
LIMITATIONS
The recommendations and conclusions provided in this study are based on the site
materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design
information provided by the client and our experience and engineering judgment. The
conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is
expressed or implied.
The recommendations submitted in this study are based upon the data obtained from
the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those
encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations
may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be
requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify
them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction.
Additional Services
ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and
specifications to verify that the earihwork and foundation recommendations have been
properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction
specifications.
ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This
is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations
and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those
anticipated prior to the start of construction.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
BROWNIS
4
'BAY
7
RED
Oumn
I 9TH:,Pl:X
DA -1
PARK,
I �—s
a9c
Hug"
tau]
Lil
OVERL0,9K. Z- P
Pt
sr 31
wel
'77
-.165TH
N PK
�Sw--
H
'H
-IsTrH 7"+
S'
-'Sl:��'S�;*'
S
AN, -i U.
187T
PL SW 8
W I
4; .8
il.1 J8
ST
STI.
'B
KE PL
.�Sw
90TH ST SW
V.
�7
F r4u
14U
il----� 7
1
L
PUGET
'J
7
ks
UNDERWA TEW"
-7 tw
ER :j
.,;VISTA
4',V�-4�9 WY
B3u-
r1Z
�-�'BWKETTV,
, MKV
.2
S <
-i8
'SIFR
2mm v si;",
'21
fra I?, SPR'A E
WIN
Ws% 1 HIU11 PK
'T
5E !>
U
LLl
�Sl
2M
co
400
i:,L" I gp—
-W,
fefil
Sy
nm" P1
269TIl Pi r
MAPLE
Reference:
Snohomish County
Map 454
By Thomas Brothers Maps
Dated 2004
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color'
ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent
misinterpretation of the information resulting
from black & white reproductions of this plate.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering. Geology. Environmental Sciences
H
Construction Testing & lCB0 / WABO Inspection Services
Vicinity Map
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Drwn. GLS
Date Jan. 20041
Proj. No. 10934
Checked SSR
Date 1/14104
1 Plate 1
Outflow to
Creek
L
,d
Concrete
Pipe -
/A TP
IN
96
PC
TP-21
90
TP-34
100
100
TP-1 —
Approximate Location of
ECI Test Pit, Proj. No.
E-10934, Dec. 2003
Subject Site
Proposed Building
Existing Building
L -----
(To Be Removed)
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color.
ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent
misinterpretation of the information resulting
from black & white reproductions of this plate.
Approximate Scale
0 20 40 8
/led ON �11 I
Consultants, Inc.
UWEarth
GeoteChnlCal Engineering. Geology, Environmental Sciences
Construction Testing & lCB0 / WABO Inspection Services
Test Pit Location Plan
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Drwn. GLS
Date Jan. 20041
Proi. No. 10934
Checked SSR
I Date 1/15/04
IPlate 2
Free Draining
Backfill
0-0
a
0
Min 2" Dlia. 00 00 0C 12 inches
10 0 0c,
Weep Hole . Loc, - R
0
0 0 0 0
. . 0 �
. 0 , 0 . 0 0:
0 0 C
00 C
Min. 6" . -oo 1 " Drain
30 0 0 C3 0 0 C Rock
a .'-00 OC
WEEP HOLE DETAI
1foot min.
18 inches min
D 0 0 ou-b�. 0 1 %:1?-..
0 00004ZN 000 .0 0
0 0 00 0 4
0 4Z) 000r� 0 0'. 00
C3 0 0 0 0 0 4ZI,
00 0 0 0 00
0 0 1Z, 0 000 0 oq� 8000
, 0
0 0 0 0 00 0.
04� 0 c, 0 0
000 0 O'Z'o 0 0 0
0 0 4ZI 0c60 0 0 - 0 0.00 0-
C"
00 (Ro 0 0 0(2,0
00
0
0 IZI 0 0QI 0
0 j-'0 0
a 0 0 000 0
0 00004� 00 0 .0 0
0 0
c
0 IzIo 0 0 .001Z, . o'.0*Q
0 0 0 01Z) .
0 00 0 0 00
0 C�o C) 0 0"
0013 000 o 0Z 0:- -
0 1Z, 0 0 0
00 0
0.,
0 VJ 0 00 0
00 0 0 0 , 0
0 0 00 0 - 0 . 0
0 0 'ZI C60.
0 4ZI —OCLO n ft
1 foot min. Compacted Subgrade
1) Free Draining backfill should consist of
granular soil having no more than 5
percent passing the #200 sieve and
no particles greater than 4 inches in
diameter. The percentage of particles
passing the #4 sieve should be between
25 and 75 percent
2) Structural backfill should be free of
organics, clayey soils, debris and other
deleterious materials. It should be
placed at or near the optimum moisture
content.
3) Where weep holes are utilized, surround
each weep hole with 3 cubic feet of 1 inch
drain rock. Maximum horizontal spacing
of weep holes should be 6 feet.
4) Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid
PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots
facing down; tight jointed; with a positive
gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated
plastic pipe. Drain line should be bedded
on and surround with free draining 1 inch
drain rock. The drain rock may be
encapsulated with a geotechnical drainage
fabric at the engineers discretion.
Excavated Slope
Perforated Pipe
Wrapped with
Filter Fabric
LEGEND
Surface Seal; Native Soil or other Low
Permeability Material
0 0 0,Z' Free Draining Backfill
1�0 0 0 J
Structural Fill compacted to 90 percent
relative compaction
1 inch Drain Rock
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geolechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists
Construction Testing & ICBO / WABO Inspection Services
RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL
18916 Sound View Place
I Edmonds, Washington I
Drwn. GLS
Date Jan. 2004
Proj. No. 10934
Chocked SSR
I Date 1/15/04
1 Plate 3
Slope To Drain
6 inch min.
00
0 .0 0 0 00 o 01. 00 0 000
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04zlo 0
0�00 00
0 0 'ZI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0%0 0000 04z10%0 coo O'Z 0c60 0 0 0
0
C) a 0 0-0 C> a 0 C> 0 P"o 0
C) 0 C> 6 0 0 00Z 0 C, 0 0 0 00 C
00 0000 0000 0 () 0 0 000 0 0 00 00
QJ 0 0 a a 0 0 0 C' 0() .0 0 Q1 0 0 0 0
000 0 " 0 .0 00 0 0 0 oOr, 0 ('
z 0000 z 0 0 C3000ozo 00 0 . OOC
000 0 04� 0 00 a 0% o , 00. 0 0
0 00 0 o 0 a 0 00 0 0 00
04z) 000 0 00 0 0 OIZ, 00 0 000 0 z eo
0 0 rJ0 a 0 0 0 (Joa. 0 0 0
4 inch min. 0 . c> r.) 0 00, 0 1z, 000
0 a 00 00 0 000
0 0. 0 00
Diameter 0 0 0 00 000 0 0 0 0
Q) 0 0 0 0 0 00
c" 00 es 000%* 0 0 0
0
Perforated Pipe 00 0 0 0 000 0
000 0 0 00 00 0. C> CJ
Wrapped in Drainage cc 000000ri '00 . 0 '* 00
0 0 00 Z 0 00 Orj� 0
Fabric 0 i3% 0
0 a 00 000000
4�. (0 0-0-��
1 0-
inch
nin.
2 ii i min.
2 inch min. / 4 inch max. 12 inch 10-�
min.
Surface seal; native soil or other
low permeability material.
0 0 0 .
'ZI 0 00 0
G 0 C) 1" Drain Rock
0 0—
Drain pipe; perforated or slotted dgld
0 PVC pipe laid with perforations or
slots facing down; fight jointed; with a
positive gradient. Do not use flexible
corrugated plastic pipe. Do not be
building downspout drains into footing
lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric
or equivalent.
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists
Construction Testing & ICBO / WABO Inspection Services
TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington I
Drwn. G LS
Date Jan. 2004
Proj. No. 10934
Chocked SSR
I Date 1/15/04
Plate 4
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION
E-10934
Our field exploration was performed on December 12, 2003. Subsurface conditions at
the site were explored by excavating three test pits to a maximum depth of nine feet
below grade. The test pits were excavated by Northwest Excavating and Trucking,
Inc. using a backhoe.
Approximate test pit locations and elevations were determined by pacing from the
existing lot boundaries and referencing plans provided by the client. The locations and
elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by
the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location
Plan, Plate 2.
The field exploration was continuously monitored by a geologist from ECI, who
classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained
representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site
features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil
samples were placed in closed containers and returned to the laboratory for further
examination and testing.
Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates A2 through A4.. The final logs represent
the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory examination and
testing. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries
between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GRAPH
LETTER
MAJOR DIVISIONS
i.SYMBOL
SYMBOL
TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
C� C�' <
GW
�gw
Well -Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand
Gravel
01A0A0A
��
Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
And
Clean Gravels
41111111,
Poorly -Graded Gravels,Gravei-
Gravelly
(little or no fines)
Coarse
Soils
��g P
Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
Grained
G M
Silty Gravels, Gravel - Sand -
Soils
More Than
.5o% Coarse
Gravels With
g M
Silt Mixtures
Fraction
Retained On
Fines ( appreciable
amount of fines
Clayey Gravels, Gravel - Sand -
No. 4 Sieve
��g C
Clay 'Mixtures
Sw
Well -Graded Sands, Gravblly
Sand
And
Clean Sand
a
SW
Sands, Little Or No Fines
*,6*7.....�:i
SP
Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly
Sandy
(little or no fines
More Than
50% Material
Soils
Sp
Sands, Little Or No Fines
Larger Than
More Than
SM
No. 200 Sieve
50% Coarse
Sands With
Sm
S Ity Sands, Sand - Silt Mixtures
Size
Fraction
Fines (appreciable
Passing No 4
Sieve
amount of fines)
-, 00% .;
SIC
-SC
Clayey Sands, Sand -Clay Mixtures
Inorganic Silts & Very Fine Sands, Rock FloLr,Silty-
Clayey Fine Sands; Clayey Silts wl Slight Plasticity
Fine
Sil.ts Liquid Limit
Inorganic Clays of Low To Medium Plasticity,
Grained
And Less Than 50
�//////Zil
Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean
Soils
Clays
Organic Silts And Organic
01
Silty Clays Of Low, Plasticity
M H ---
Inorganic Silta, Micaceous Of Diatomaceous Firf�,
More Than
Mh
Sand Or Silty Soils
50% Material
Smaller Ttan
Silts Liquid Limit
And
�Ch
InorrgaRic Clays� Of High
No. 200 Sieve
Greater Than 50
Clays
rllIX4�10�
Plasticity, Fat Clays.
Size
organic Clays Of Medium ' To High
[O�H
Oh
Plasticity, Organic Silts
P T,
Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils
Highly Organic Soils
Pt
With High Organic Conten.ts
Topsoil
'd
Humus And Duff Layer
Fill
Hftlhly Variable Constituents
The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature
of the material presented In the attached logs.
DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification.
C
TORVANE READING, tsf
2" O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER
qu
PENETROMETER READING, tst
W
MOISTURE, % dry weight
24" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
P
SAMPLER PUSHED
SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED
WATER OBSERVATION WELL
pcf
DRY DENSITY, lbs. per cubic ft.
LL
LIQUID LIMIT, %
sz DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER
Pi
PLASTIC INDEX
DURING EXCAVATION
Earth Consultants Inc.
T SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/ DATE
LEGEND
Proj. No. 10934 1 Date Jan. 2004 1 Plate A 1
Test Pit Log
Project Name:
18916 Sound View Place 1
Sheet Of
1 1
Job No.
10934
Logged by:
SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test Pit No.:
TP-1
Excavation Contactor:
NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation:
95'
Notes:
General
Notes
W
cL
E
a)
a
cL L E
-6
.0
E
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": grass
9.2
....
:YY
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SM
Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist
-dense
-oxide staining
-very dense
-contains cobbles
-gray
Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater
encountered during excavation.
Earth Consultants Inc.
Grotedink.-al Fnginc"r, Gm-Avsm & Fmironmenrai sdm.*q.s-
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Proj. No. 10934
Dwn. GLS
Date Jan.2004
Checked SSR
Date 1/15/04 _FPZe
A2
-->uDsurrace conamions cepictea represent our oDservations at the time and location ot this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and
judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
W^—fi— ^n *K;. I—
Test Pit Log
Project Name:
18916 Sound View Place
Sheet Of
1 1 1
Job No.
10934
Logged by:
1 SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test Pit No.:
TP-2
Excavation Contactor:
NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation:
95,
Notes:
General
Notes
W
M
-6
Z
@L E
0 W
(D
5- E
—
0) 0
6 .0
u) E
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6": grass
12.5
8.4
.. ...
2
3
4
5
6
7
SM
Brown silty fine to medium SAND, medium dense, moist (Possible Fill)
SM
Grayish brown silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist
-29.2% fines
Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater
encountered during excavation.
Earth Consultants Inc.
Gt-otedinloal nnsineor� G&Mnisj�
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Proj. No. 10934
Dwn. GLS
Date Jan.2004
Checked SSR I
Date 1/15/04
Plate A3
Subsurfaoe conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and
j��gimer�. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
I f --f-4 — fhi. I—
Test Pit Log
Project Name:
18916 Sound View Place
Sheet Of
1 1
Job No.
10934
Logged by:
1 SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test Pit No.:
TP-3
Excavation Contactor:
— NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation:
95'
Notes:
General
Notes
W
2 -6
2
2
CL
LL E
0 M
(n
u) -6
.0
E
>'
U)
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": grass
5.
1 9
38.2
8.2
f:
.T. XX
HT'.
ITT:
2
3
4
5
6
8
SM
Brown silty fine SAND, medium dense, moist
-trace organics, roots
-26.8% fines
-dense
-oxide staining
-contains cobbles
Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater
encountered during excavation.
Earth Consultants Inc.
Gmyt"ink-al Fnsinft-m ci-,4N1-;N- &
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Proi. No. 10934 T��
GLS
Date Jan. 2004
Checked SSR
Date 1/15/
ate A4
UU*Ul IOUC W11UMUilb UUVITtUU represent our ouservations at the time ana location ot tnis exploratory Mole, moditied by engineering tests, analysis and
�mer�.,They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
_.f.A — #hi. I—
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
E-10934
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Particle Size Distribution Report
90
80
0
I)f
W 60
Z
Z 50
III
0
W
LLj 40
30
20
10
0
200 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm
% COBBLES
% GRAVEL
% SAND
% SILT
I % CLAY
USCS
AASHTO
PL
LL
38:6
32.2
29.2
SM
4.1
1 69.1
26.8
SM
I
I
I
SIEVE
PERCENT FINER
inches
0
0
si,
_e
I ' 5
100.0
100.0
3/4
72.7
100.0
3/8
68.3
98.1
�RAIN SIZ�
D60
0
rDW)
3.91
0.264
0.0813
0.0993
1310
10
COEFFICIENTS
cc
CU
SIEVE
number
PERCENT FINER
0
0
S2L
#4
61.4
95.9
48
58.0
94.4
416
54.6
92.4
#30
50.7
86.8
950
44.4
65.4
#100
36.4
38.3
#200
29.2
26.8
SOIL DESCRIPTION
0 TP-2: 8'- SM
Brown silty Sand w/ gravel; 8.4% moisture
0 TP-3: 2'- SM
Brown silty Sand; 15.9% moisture
REMARKS:
0 tech: Jonathan Reeve
0 tech: Jonathan Reeve
* Source: Sample No.: TP-2 Elev./Deptli: 8'
* Source: Sample No.: Tp-3 Elev./Depth: 2'
Client: Tom Braaten Construction
EARTH Project: 18916 Soundview
CONSULTANTS, INC._ Proie&t No.: E-10943 Plate B I
DISTRIBUTION
E-10934
4 Copies Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
Earth Consultants, Inc.
;:ridaySeptember 19, 2003 12:19 PM Tom Braaten 425-637-1410 07
2'X2'Xlfi- DEEP, 4-6- SPALLS 13R EQUAL
DEEP' E
VX
rROM COWNTREL CS LwX DEEP. 3/4' CRUSHED ROCIC
FROM CONTR13L
OWNM
ADDFX�SS
STANDARD DRAINAGE DETENTION SYSTM
WOBIKSHEET
CALC BY:
PHONE:
DATIE:
I
lox
*****DES/GN DATA*****.
IMPERVIOUS AREA PIPE DIA PIPE L. ORIFICE
LMINO LID
WTENTION PIPEXENGTH � =V
XTYPICAL)
rimsHED
MINIMUM
TIMM *AL%W&% Or
coNE sax OR Risti
3Z TO 12 SLOPE
U OUTLET
�"()UtLET CONTROL
MIN.
1 2
UPPER C CH BASIN URIFICE
CONTROL CATCH BASIN
4"M 'Y COPY
SYSTEM CROSS SECTION
f?ECEI VED
OCT 3 9 2003
WMENT SERVICES CTR.
ITY OF EDMONDS
KIN IW LdM
W1,019V LEVEL
PERF PIPE W/ END CAP$
P%NCHM1%& W
It PLkCrpMNfiP WTH MI
RipfiAp ouner VASHED 0 RAIN ROCK
RUNOFF SPREADER. TRENCH
F0077NG DRAINS SHALL NOTIM CONMECTED 70 DETENTION SYSTEM
N07ES.-
1. Call Engineering Division MI-0220) for a tigbdine and detention system inspection
APPROVED BY
z-- ;-26-F-Ming end for final inSpections.
Iq
iRespoasibility for operation and maintenance of drainage systems on private property is the 1403.
nsibility of the property owner. Material accumulated in the. storage, pipe xmist be fludwd
re-spom
out and removed from the catcb basins to allow proper aperatioiL The outlet control orifice DATB
RECEIVED
DEC 1 2 2003 ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS / PLANNERS / DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
Don Fiene, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
City Of Edmonds, DSD, Engineering
121 5 1h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: 180i�,'§�unid-Vie*Place,='- Drainage Waiver Request
Dear Don:
December 12, 2003
LSA File No. 4958
On behalf of our Client, Tom Braaten Construction Inc., this is a formal request for a drainage waiver for
a proposed single family residence. The developer proposes to discharge runoff from the developed site
directly into Fruitdale Creek very near its connection to Puget Sound. The outlet would be through a
dissipater 'tee' with appropriate riprap pad. All surface, roof and footing drains will be connected to the
discharge line.
Justiflication:
1. Granting the waiver would allow this developer the same discharge that was granted to the owner to the
north on Lindsey Place under City File Number 97-294.
2. Since the existing. drainage from the site currently directly discharges to the Creek, granting this waiver
would allow the developer to replace and improve the existing direct discharge system. The existing pipe
discharges at the top of the slope. The new system would discharge at the toe of the slope.
During construction the contractor shall employ the required Temporary erosion control BMPs to control
silt form leaving the site.
Your favorable approval of this waiver is requested. If you require additional information, please let me
know. A site plan has been enclosed for your information.
Sincerely, RECEIVED
DEC 12 2003
ENGINEERING DIVISION
iZ,e�cr �, Ltlds4y Flece-,
P:\LSA Engineering Docs\4500 thru 4599\4598\4315-jo-Itr-dfl2l]03.doc
0
F-or-
/0 3
Lovell-Sauerland & Associates, Inc.
19400 33rd Ave. W., Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA 98036 425-775-1591 42S-672-7998 fax
Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:15 AM Tom Braaten 425-637-1410
09/05/2005 22.41 FAX 4257460860
Earth CXXIISL)Itants� Inc.
(im"11,41w.41 1.*J);"41q%'r% twulligorNA 1;.n%'avv'dwoni1 lwicnitsts
Ov.�1mik"I 11*401got I .
tl 0 ti,
September 2, 2005
Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
Subject: Final Report
Construction Monitoring Services
1 Mn'6"3ou6dVi6W Place
Woodinville, Washington
Ref erence: Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Study
E-10934, dated January 23, 2004
Dear Mr. Braaten-
0
p.02
Z 002/003
Lstahlish�xl 1971
E-1 0934-1
Asjequ�sted, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) provided construction monitoring Services al�the
subject site, ECI previously prepared the referenced geotachnical engineering study for the
project and provided on -site observations andtesting on a part-time basis from April 8, 2004,
to April 27, 2004.
An ECI. representative visited the site three times to observe the building foundation footing
subgrade. The subgrade was established on native soils and prepared in accordance with
ECI's recommendations. Soil conditions were observed to be.dense and stable, and suitable
for the allowable soil bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf).
Based on our observations, the earthwork was performed in accordance with our
recommendations and the approved plans.
1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670
Other Localions
Fife
We anesday, September 07, 2005 8:15 AM
,09/05/2005 22:41 FAX 4257460860
Tom Braaten 425-687-1410
0.003/003
p.03
Tom Braaten Construction
September 2, 200S
We trust this letter meets your noods. It you have any questions, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
EARTH CONSULTANTS. INC,
Chul P. Gugich
Geotechnical Field Manager
few M-5 92-Mo -
Kristina M. Weller, PE
Manager of Geotechnical Services
CF1G/KMW/1ap
Earth ConRdtanls, inc.
E-10934-1
Page 2
Vi"
lb
X 37 '/ 7' W
Jl�
. . . . . . .............
&AV J'w
6\ A
Zb
pi,
00
ew f5t'f3."
ru
Vi
Us wNregzlma anvr.
ry
ou
41
3 7 ". 1-7-',6-.
SOUND V"l EW'
IT.
S!711'Am:,AV AD.M., Wi"&T-ER LINE EASEMENTS ACROSS LOTS P.
AND.. D, CITY. OF EDMONDS LOT LINE, ADJUSTMENT-%
NO.- LL-2000-74..
102
Ir
107
0'" 0 103
52
ROPO' 104
RESID
LINE 105
106
APPROX LOCATION OF EX
12" N-12 OUTLET
110 50
.0%0.
112
EX. LINE TO BE RELOCATED GARAGE 12
(APPROMMATE LOCATION)
18916 SOUND VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS 3:
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SCALE 1: 40 'o DRII
IR
z
9
EX CATCH BASIN 88 00" w 0
4, 4
CDNETRUCTIDN SURVEY
-91r
EDGE DF CREEK L DCA TIDN
04
18916 SDUND VIEW PLACE
RRS INC, TOM BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION
Land Surveying
12855 NE 145TH PL. LSA JOB NO. 4598 - 12.12.03
KIRKLAND, WA.
98034 425-864 _ 0944
V 14 U)
10, Earth ConsUta iltsJ11tc
Field Rep.,
1.
�-.-'Job No.
Page of
Report No.
Ceotechnical En&�� C.""s & En,4"11 scientLsts
const�-tion Tesdng & ICDO / WABO lnspec�i Scnicm
Time On Site
Time Off Site
Date
Day of Week
U0
1805 136th Place ME', Suite 201 - Bellevue, WA 98005
I.-T
Z_
L+ C; L4
Belle�ue (425) 643-3780 Toll Frd'6 (q§8) 739-6670
Travel Time
Miles
Weather
FAX (425) 746-0860
DNLY FIELD REPORT
Hrs. Charged
Visitors
Project
Job Location
- y
I . " g:
Client/owner
T7 XoN,,4-r-om—
General Contractor General ContractoriSuperintendent -
Received Unchecked By
radin Contracto
G 9 r Grading Foreman
Checked By
Date
Are approv d Plans/Permits on -site E] Yes No- If No, contact the building department or explain below:'.
Project -No. Permit No.
�M
MgOIL4YI r/M7,)�5C
N)0,77W 56)L--5
a?<4�105MW,
$,J,
_6_r_15 _77 L., 1"Tf
;;1'U tv f- I 0-4-J-H
'A cv-e, -g�-y
m 147 0
ev
7-0 — vt7mc_--T.� a,
L
I 3_1
41
F. rz D
2 Is
M" NYC.
LV
APR Mu
I IS
L
Devi:,
OF'
01VT Vy
COPY TW'"2--j"*
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE,
f a�
Ad Earth Consultants� Inc
Field Rep.
Job No.
Page of
Report No.
Gmechnical Engncffs� GcDiDgt%s & EnNironmental Sclaidsts
cmmuctim Tesdng & icw / wm)o ins�i smices
Time On Site
Time Off Site
Date
Day_of Week
7_16-
7- '-f 5
L4,-7,r_)-t
1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201 - Bellevue, WA 98005
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 - Toll Free (888) 739-6670
Travel Time
Miles
Weather
FAX (425) 746-0860
DAILY FIELD REPORT .
Permit No.
Hrs. Charged
Visitors
1
Project,96.`:�/G
Job Location
Client/Owner
-&, rF(7rVr-k-'�
1—c"
General Contractor General Contractor's Superintendent
Received Unchecked By
Grading Contractor Grading Foreman
Checked By
Date
Are approved PlanstPermits on -site [3 Yes [] No If No, contact the building department or explain below:
Project No. Permit No.
A6
gg,'vc
�Pz- gmt-,e'-
W .41 <A-MrV
Ve7-j5iC -7Z 46W-r (2Z7J',5itX- NA77VL-.
.6�U,!�-
44-t-
L-,.JA5 Fit -cc
-;4'-
'Mir— Si_-�ejcf,
R7, 'F-
I VY= L
AM 11A
luu't
CIR. DEVELOPMIK.�YICES CTA.
5ER,
DEN ED motg)s Or
X
I COPY TO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE D
16:�_N "I
091_1�mkh. Earth consultants, Inc
Field Rep.
Job No.
Page of
Report No.
CHLtG.
Cmtechnical Fn9bKffS, GeokOSAS & ai�tumiental scienfists
Cmsmrfim TesMg & latO / WABO Inspwtion Senwcs
Time On Site
Time Off Site
Date
1�ayof Week
UQP
1805 136th Place N E , Suite 201 - Bellevue, WA 98005
-V'4j5
) 4.�c
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 - Toll Free (888) 739-6670
Travel Time
Miles
Weather
FAX (425) 746-0860
DAILY FIELD REPORT
Permit No.
Hrs. Charged
).7
Visitors
1
ProjecQ�/G
5c, )�_ff V I t-t
Job Location
I
Client/Owner
'01Z,44-rn-
General Contractor General Contractor's Superintencle�t Received Ur
Grading Contractor Grading Foreman Checked By
Date
Are approved Plans/Permits on -site [-] Yes [] No If No, contact the building department or explain below:
Project No. Permit No.
M
1
C:7, 1�5 V
AE; e_—) 7e.) r'_
Ti::,e;-r7 r-_k:S7
L_ I t�_� L,—"-UZC
t 6-71 rj e;r-
-goEis-
Ogg i_�A6
.L-rnL_r)—y
_TP-1C_
LJ-T7 L, I -rY (71 )2 95'
L--#6�6 jr-C M(:)V E _11
'42- _Ea�M L L'L'
.L+t6r-C
06
2-L-F-2
-
-04
—5+1�5 - - -
—17 (1;)
5:7-5-1
Y-1 U/ MrV
-2L-477� -J LX_
OZ/1
.1f
ROZI
UlUlt
r% C11R.
-r,or-Es
DEVELOP�Eyf SERV!XS CTR.
o_-
Q_Evf�� EIDOO
-LIM
cum
I COPY TO: CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE [I
\Scll� SWA \A(,w N4Q
(6-5. C70
As/6, (o
14&T' AU4&4617 114, 8�0
Wf ey". 41&T 1w. so
NX opA
W..
ft
IKFWwl,,>jc, Ae-r--A C46LAC12�-
pr,. 4liz
palve IA,3s
rAllo 3fbs
IbT44, (v 15 6 5w P-
LOTAWA 23&0;
% itjfSjz,/jC>Uc, -2,&.
NOTED
�:ERING
BY
Date:
W-iae- -Z PLA-fd S 04-rfn�>
Sl�LU t04 T:V�
& 1pec-� �-. ,
-b S) /40,>
PROVED BY PLANNING
sw
1193�
10
--jlb5 PW-r,3 644"6iv-
"tt-t 6QL.Ls
Lly
--r- pl"rew-5^1-1
W/VW F?Af'
,!>q ol
(4-bC5
C0,613
lom-11-11,
APR 0. 1 KZA
PERMIT COUNTS
11/22/2004 17:44 3606814959 NIS WEBB SURVEYING PAGE 02
I I " I , ,
r-- F F T [ F [ (,- 1� T I (--) f.,r
M.S. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
362 Buck Loop Road
Sequin% WA 98382
Phone: (360)681-4858/(206)718-5323
November 22, 2004
TOM BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION Co., INC.
3443 Evergreen Pt. Rd.
Medina, WA 98039
Regarding: 18-9-16 Sound - Vie� Place-7
To Whom ft May Concern:,
a 11
MICROFILM
Our firm, at your request, undertook to determine the height of the roof for the home
under construction at the address indicated above. The highest point of the roof was
measured on this date, using the bench mark specified on the site topographic survey,
and was found to be 120.95.
Please contact me at the address or telephone number indicated above should you have
any question or need finther assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael S. Webb, PLS
Certificate No. 16230
z
RECEIVED
DEC 0112 2004
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
nit
WSC Job #A -.� Sq I
PscAA # A cc, 3 0321D
RABANCO
WASTE SHIPMENT RECORD
Cont #
1. waste Generated StteName ynd Address:
C 70 VVI
LV 0 00 "ftrA
Ownprs qame:
VO Vr K, & K h � /0
Owners Phone No.:
6644 t
vl,�w PlAul C-0
bAAQ+&,,l C014. (143
7� Z443
M tZ tj 04
2. Operators Name and Address:
Operator's Phone No.:
WALKER SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
(2 06) 3 61-8 913
PO BOX 469, Snohomish, WA 98291-0469
3. Waste Disposal Site (WDS) Name and Address, and Physical Site Locations:
WDS Phone No.:
RABANCO REGIONAL LANDFILL
500 Roosevelt Grade Rd.
1-800-927-5641
Roosevelt WA 99356
4. Responsible Local, State or EPA Agency Name and Address:
PUGET SOUND -CLEAN AIR_AGENCY___
110 Union Street, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98101
5. Description of Waste Materials:
6. Containers
7. Total Quanffly
No. Type
M3 (yd')
Asbestos Containing Materials 6&c� V,
_ZtStScAiQ,%
8. Special Handling Instructons and Additional Informationj
DOUBLE BAGGED & LABELED�
9. OPERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I hereby declare that the contents.of this consignment are fully accurately described
above by proper shipping name and are classified, packed, marked and labeled, and are in all respects in proper
condition for transport by highway according to applicable International and government regulations.'
Printpd/Typed Name
Signature
Month
Day
1-1
Year
'13
10. Transporter I Acknowledgment of Receipt of Materials Mr A,
Printed/Typed Name
F.
-i
Mon h- JAV
tit, 1j.
I
11. Transporter 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt of Matedols
PrInted/Typed Name
Signature
Month
Day
Year
Rabanco Transfer
2733 3rd Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 206-646-2565
12. Discrepancy Indication Space
Wade Disposal RRLC
13. Authorized Waste Disposal Site Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of asbestos materials covered by this manifest except
as noted in item 12
Printed/Typed Name R
FMCE"au
Month
Day
Year
FEB
2004
WHITE: Return to Operator
WVVQLVr-rAF_rQ1 acnyluca %01".
CITY OF EDMONDS
YELLOW: Waste Site
PINK: Transporter WHITE: Operator
DEC 29 2003 2:20PM HP LASERJET 3200 P.1
e162. -Y?
AIR SAMPLE DATA SHEET
WALILEN
POP Of
job Ndmi—ber A.i�_2_
P.O. Box 469, SNOHOMISH, WA 98291-0469 Client Job Number
(206)361-8913,(360)805-0354. FAX (425)806-7383 Number of Samples
GCOWALIKESCO541.9, Asbestos Cart. #01198
Client: !�ed4t P)VP4A Abatement Firm:
nArp Results to: a=
Location: /a& &wnd wea, 2 F
. I - U)Blank Cassettes:
Sampled by: 'g. Date: Blank count:
Company: tAVG.)
Date:
Received by: '?� " 1
Analyzed by:��;� Date:
Microscope filed area:
C34 Ir-Iry-ld. f%nal /';-- �smm) or 37mm
Location: 7&9:�&,P_ t4AV
Observations: S F%L4
Worker:aN MfUk§4e_X1J SS#:
Time: Start q.' 2 R- Rate: Start I - III:
End j0j,'j_o__ End'
Minutes Average
cert It 2-14
Fibers/ Fibers/
Liters Fields cc
Sample IDA � 2.51 2_,!� 1
Sample Type_--9aFa=
Protection: —K--*—N
Decon:
Environment:
Pump #: LV-
Sample
tion:
Locatiory
Sample Type: CA-
Protection:
Decon:
Environment:
pump #: L�V - I:&
Observations:
Worker
SS#:
Cert #:
Time: Start /p _%3L Rate: Start Fibers/
End 1 .2 End Liters Fields
Minutes = _LIE Average
Fibers/
cc
Sample ID:
Sample T
Protection:
Decon:
Environment:
Location:
Observations:
Worker:
SS#:
Cart #:
Time: Start Rate: Start Fibers/
End End Liters Fields
Fibers/
cc
Pump #:'
Minutes
Average
Sample ID:
Location:
Sample TypgL_
Protection:
Decon:
Environment:
Observations:
Worker:
SS#:
Cart #:
Time: Start Rate: Start Fibers/
End End Liters Fields
Fibers/
cc
Pump #: —
Minutes=
Average
Sample ID: —
Location:
Sample Type: —
Protection:
Decon:
Environment:
Observations:
Worker:
SS#:
Cert M.
Time: Start Rate: Start Fibers/
End End Liters Fields
Fibers/
cc
Pump
Minutes
Average
-Sample Types—
B-Brealhing Zone
P-Pre Abalemeni
TWA
CL-Clearance
A -Area
X-Aggressive
1-Inside rag area
H-HEPA exhaust
O-Outolde req area
C-celling
BL-Fleld Blank
Respiratoty Protection,
PA -Pressure Demand Air
CA-Contlnuous Flow Air
PAPR
F-Ful Face Mask APR
M-Half Mask APR
Decontamination: EnAmmnent
D,S-Decon w/Shower H-HEPA Vacuum
O-Decon w10 Shower N-Negativ.9 Air
G-Glovebeg
12
Hocc—l-ved- 9 : -35 A N-1 �IM3 CjAv_j., M 3 -,- '�'JALKLH SP17C UONST: P�,Cw 1
12/24/2003 08:27 FAX 206 689 4073 PS CLEAN AIR lao0i
-: WALKER SPEC CONST; 42580e7383; Dec-19-03 4:05PM; Page 1
;ent ts�
To: PSAkp# At: 92066894073
Date Received
PUOET SOUND CLEAN Al, AGENCY
I to union strtcl� Suft 500
290 S'A I H DEC 19 2003
Z" Seettle, WA "101-2039
www.pscleanair-org
,4gency 41,Te ORIY NOTICE OF INTENT Ageney Use 0-�v
A,`PrqAe&-fVPe1 ]Erlahle Asbestos ReMoval 2. Mable AsbestQ3 Ik =111 I k Demothign 3. Mmolition Qnly
B. Phone: (42 )637-2663
FropertyOwner: Voctmann clo Tom Braaten Constmetion
��ig, Address: 3 443 Everlpten Potnt Rd Ci% Medl, ia, State WA I Zip,____98039
C. Asbestos owne -ICEO: Bill Walker
C ontractor, Walker Specialty Construction, Inc, Contractor
Mailing Address: po B*.x 469 _ phoni : (425)806-7377 Job No.:
2u�. Snohomisb state; WA Zip: 98291 Fax: (4252306-7383 A2542
L). Site city. Ed,-nonds 98020
kddress- 18916,Soinid View Place
Tom
or
A,Hr--O,A Building
Inspector ArLYnn Hammond
An Ah:BRA Survey ig requi-d befo- all demofidlin MOO
F. Demollftu I Start
1�emollllull
4,ontrac or; Goodnight Construction
G. Friable Asbestos
Frolect Informal
to
L�! �Ircprl
cement lid.
Local Phone: (425)637-2663
Date of Asbestos Was r'hiable Asbestos Identifica?f Eyes ONO
survey u/84Q3 was vontriable Asbestos Identified? Eyes ONO
Certification CLAYS327 Alm h a copy of t&swvey when friable asbesrow
11m, Date 8112J04 has # or been idenilfted MMMP_
�oileaurnace Ins, U Ouct
LJ Paints 0 F145W
Cem=t Pipe —Wrriabic F1,
26
cwres: I I
Will Tionfiiablc asbesto,
if yes, list type and qty.
or
1, Single -Family Residence'.
A. I " Asbestos Removal Project Orily
B. 6 Derpoli-tion Project (with or without asbestos removal project)
17 Training Fire (List Fire Dept.)
2, :1 ordered Demolition (attach COPY —Of —Order)
L
b , loft in place during demo? 0 yes AD No
Ins. Ot rr:
C4atin O�,tr:
Ig Mht'l i Ot cr;
I WaTk Days: M T W Th F Sa Su
Hours;CZ-'UV am —
Will all friable asl
>19;E!
A. Prior Notice A.
B. 10 Days* '�' el
Yes
"IA80=6 MMOV41 can 0rVJJ1 UWU
_Wo7tV,rf the singiefamIlY rwidgfice & owned by onefwM& who has been or wig
re vin-i I ic residgnee as iheir
do)nIcUag thc n4ove boxOS
1A or 1B may be checked. A sbgle faMI& fesidence doa not include renud Erogem,
Muil 9-famity axis. or d�n
mixed -use baddIng.
$200
—
2,
D--A11 other Demolitions With No Afibestos Removal Project
10 Days
Friabla Asbestos Projects (!other than Single Family Residence):
-
Asb tstas Vemck
$100 $100
3.
U 2:10 - 25; Funear fwt andlor �: 48 - 159 square feet of �i�_Ios
Pric r Notice 10 Days
$200 $too
4.
LJ 260 - 999 linear reel and/or 160 - 4,999 gSuare feet of asbestos
__A Days
S750 'S250
5.
17 > l,000 linear feel anator �v5, squaye feet of asbestos
- Li Emergency I)gmolifion Project
10 Days
PNdo Norice
Twicc Project Fee
6.
emergency Asbestos Project Or
:�
writi)nczncrAencyreqq"!L__L_�
A
Age
ccrfify tho infwnation containcd in Lhis nodfico6on& supplainental don 19, t0th0hCA"rJbYknC'w d UM'8& ple
Walker Specialty COGMuctiOn, ln':- 12/ 1.9/03
Dwe Reviewed
pUget Stlund Cicnn Ait Agcncy Foan No.: 66-160 Oteviaed 9/03)"I'S
Recelved: 12/24/03 9:36AM; 2 r 06 (�Aq. �Q73 - > YVALKER SPEC CONST; Page 2
1,2/24./2003 08:28 FAX 206 689 4073 PS CLiAN AIR 0002
de L by: WALKLM SftU UUN51; 4258067383; Dec-19-D3 4:06PM; Page 2
Tht Fuget Sound Clow Air Agency rcquires, advance notification before any pmot commences a firiable asbestos project
invo4ving materials equal to or greater in size than 10 linear feet or 48 square fee and for all demolition projects
(regardless of asbosto3 content) involving structumq with a projected roof area gri ater than 120 square feat (Regulation
IU, Article 4). All asbestos removal and demolition notifications must be submil..-ed to the Agency on current Agency
fon-ris. Asbestos removal iad demolition proiects; hivolving rriggrials, and stir
ucturi 3 below the notification threshold are
stil! sub *act to all other req- ,imments of ftgulation TIL ArticJS-4, SiteAddress: 18)16 Sound View Pl, Edmonds
After receiving . a complete notification with the appropriate project fee, the Api icy will review the form and return a
copy to the asbestos and demolition contractor by mail. The returned copy will be,,our validated notification.
Mailing Address: PO Box 134?
State: WA
culdlutor's
11honc: (360)794-6220 1 Job#:
GUIDF.UNES FOR 3USMITTING AN ASBESTOSMEMOLMC N NOTIFICATION
Step 1. Check the appropriate project type in Box A. Friabil sabesWe includes popcom cei in& material, sheet vinyl flooring, cement
asbestos board siding, and duct insulation, Nonfriable gatiggm is normally found in vinyl f) Por tiles, window putty and most roofing
Step 2. Enter proporty owner information in Box B.
Step 3. Enter the asbcstos contractor or property owner information, if the property own.:r is conducting a single-family residential
project, in Box C. Print clearly this is your return mailing label.
Stv.p 4. Enter the site address for all notifications i ' n Box D. For multi -structure projects. attach supplernontal sheet with a site map
(include an address for each site) and a list of the "a and amount of Wable asbestos to be t tmoved from each structure.
Step S. Cbeck either asbestos survey or material presumed in Box E. All demolitions re quire that an Asbestos Kazard Emergency
Reiponse Act (AHERA) asbestos survey be conducted by a ciertified AHIMA building Iwc.)ector, AtucbLa copy gf the surycy—to the
ngpjfication gf a demolition prolggLwhen only non&iabW asbestos or ng ashospos j;s,iden J oalho sury".
Stop 6. Enter the project Information in Box P. and check the training flre or ordered dt mollition box it'approptiate (a copy of the
official order must be attached). All asbestos must be rarnoved prior to conducting a training fire. Additional Training tire
revuiremem arc contained in Regulation 1, Section us. if any nonfirlable asbestos maW ials will be left in place during demolition,
chuck yes and list the type and quantity of material.
Stop 7. Enter asbestos project information in Box G. List types of friable asbestos materia to be removed: surfacing material such as
po:)Com ceilinp or plaster, sheet vinyl flooring, duct and pipe insulation, cement asbesta% h.wd siding or pipe, etc.
Stup S. For Single -Family 'Residential projects-, check BOX HIA for renovation projects BOX HID for demolition projects with or
wiliout asbestos rcmoval. Asbestos removal may be conducted after a complete notificad in is received, but demolition actiyities can
only begin on the I O'k day after the notification is received, Note: Af the s&gk family i mildance is owned by oive famUy who has
bezn or wHJ he u,-Rft the resideAce as thdr demkile. bown 1A or 1B may be chooW. , 4 singlefami(v Pesidence does not inetude
rciwt property, muld-fivnity unns, or any mLred-use hnildLV.
For C . ommercial asbestos projects (or projecti that do not qualify as Single Family Raidential); check the project category H2 -
5 ,'-hat matches the amount of friable asbestos that will be removed. If a demolition is 1 avolved, include the appropriau surcharge
(additional fee) in your payment. To file for in emergency asbestos or demolition projew t, check the appropriate box I — 5 and the
applicable emergency box in H6. All emarygmy-mquests m!Ast be Lc pro thm the
SqUlonied by a I ftorZA4t perty _ r
01�me demonatra
need to cg ct th roject immediately in Ill, Sec&n L.031
9),
Stap 9. Please canify the accuracy and completeness of the infbirmation provided by sigaiK � the notification in Box 1.
Mandatory amendments to the notification are required for changes that increase the prc Ject catcgvry, change the typ" of asbestos
materials to be removed and changes to start date, complation date and work schedule ft r a ' sbc$tos projects. No f�c is required for
work schedule changes If tht contractor is participating In the Agency work schedule fax pi ogram. A $25.00 processing foi: is required
for all wnendments.
Puger Sound Clean Air Agency a5bcstos regulations and forms 4ma downloaded from th; Agency wcb page at www.pWeaaair.org,
Fnr technical assistance corntact (�06) 699-4058 and rOr 2dwinistrative inquirics coauct (2116) 689-4090.
PLgci Soupd Clean Air Agrncy Forrn Nu.: 66- 160 (Reviscd 910.1) TH
-Z
lig. 4-
lCr-> -7
"C-IZA"- --nIFz,&X q4.1
KA)(IMUH A"Wr--P
020fbs-clo
A 41
no
vX
EK
LINE
0.
4 11-dTwAg: auu FOOF
A�� mvrekjAy C?Zmas. A/ wc,6
ALJ- EIZ65-jop C&pTOOL OE�
Y4 1:rn
Pl-
XXX SOUND VlEu).rLA",e per
EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
SCALE 1:20
ljMF-vfcM AgeA
4zN2
�'410
UrrtV-
ToTAL ?D,X2� TatiFoglovi -r-r.AL. '�'q FT
45,9A.66 14,00 W. Fr MAP
L411g,.)
APR-11-2003 FRI 12:50 PM FAX NO. P. 03
,'M� esxns av-'-� Pt
TO (lie City of (" dmonds:
J4 A!
3,?n
�04
PtPA
Cop � Tt
This is a request flor a vacation ofa portion of a City of Edmonds Storm Sewer Easenicil
11
To be rcvlac�;d with a new stonu sewer casement, dedicated to the City of Edmonds.
Legal description of the 10 foot wide slorni sewer easement, recording No. 2244215, to
bc vacated, said casement is located across Lot B, City ofEdmonds Lot Line Adjustment
No. LL-2000-74, and recorded under Snobornish County Recording No. 200009275007.
'I"hat Pol-tion of siio storin scwcj- easement lying Northwesterly of the following
de-,,cribcd line:
Vicg-inning it the Southwest corner of said Lot B;
thence South 57 4V 00" bast, along the Southwesterly line of said, Lot 14, 110.00 feet;
ilicrice North 88 33' 00" Fast 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of said line;
thenco North 37 17' 00" East 50.00 feet;
thunecNorth 58 10' 55" East 20 feet, more oT less, totheSouthbankofthoexisting
stream mid end orsaid line.
The vacated storm sewer casement across a portion of said Lot'B, as described above, to
lie, replaccd by 1he following described 10 foot wide storm sewer casetnerit,
That portion of Slid Lot B, City oHdmond5 Lot Linc Adjustment No. LL-2000-74,
Recording No. 200009275007, described as follows:
I'lic Northwesterly 20 feet oil width of said Lot B, EXCP.PT the Northwesterly 10
feet thercor, ALSO that portion orsaid Lot B described as follows:
Itoginningat theSouthwest cornerof said Lot B;
I hence South 52 43' 00" East 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence contintiiiig Sou(h 52 43' 00" East 90.00 feet;
thenceNorth 83 33' 00" East 15.98 feet;
thcnceNorth 52 43' 00" West 102.47 feettoapoint 20.00 feet Southwesterlyof
the Northwcsterly line of said Lot B;
thcnoq South 37 17' 00" West 10,00 feet to theTrue Point of Beginning.
From informalion gained from the City of Edrilonds, the portion of the Storin Sewer
i"a-,cinunt that is king requested vacimcd, has never been maintained by the City.
The owmr of Lot 11, installed and maintained the existing stonn sewer that is located in
1he finscinuit that is being asked to be vacated, and agrees to replace and maintain the
rillure storm Sewer within the now proposed Storm Sewer hasement, ind to replace the
siorm sewer per City of Edniolids regul. ions.
KOWIler Lot 11 Cedric Lindsay (360) 796-4276
(7 7 744-Point Whitney Road
u1lill Senion (Lindsay reprcscnt.itive(425)672-1 118) Brinnon, WA 98320
C rimy CnPY
Ix %-Y STRE' . "T FILE
Land Use: 933
Fast -Food Restaurant without
Drive -Through Window
Description
This land use includes fast-food restaurants without drive -through windows. This type of
restaurant is characterized b y a large carry -out clientele; long hours of service (some are open
for breakfast, all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late at night or 24 hours per day);
and high turnover rates for eat -in customers. These limited -service eating establishments'do not
provide table service. Patrons generally order at a cash register and pay before they eat.* High -
turnover (sit-down) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant with drive -through window
(Land Use 934) and fast-food, restaurant with drive -through window and no indoor seating (Land
Use 935) are related uses.
Additional Data
Although the facilities in this land use may or may not be open for breakfast, itwas confirmed that
the data provided during the a.m. peak periods were strictly for facilities that were open during
this time frame.
The outdoor seating area is not included in the overall gross floor area. Therefore, the number of
seats may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates for
facilities having significant outdoor seating.
The sites were surveyed between the 1980s and the 2000s throughout the United States.
It has been speculated that hamburger restaurants may generate trips at a higher rate than
other types of fast-food restaurants. The database was tested in an attempt to verify this
assumption; the data neither verified nor disproved it. Future research is needed in this
area.
Specialized Land Use Data
Current industry trends have resulted in the emergence of several new fast-food restaurants
without drive -through windows that specialize in the sale of very specific food items. The trip
generation characteristics of these facilities differ from the facilities typically contained in this land
use; their sizes, trip generation rates and peak hour of service vary considerably. Another notable
difference in these land uses is that they are typically not stand-alone facilities; these restaurants
are generally located in small shopping centers. Therefore, the information collected for these
facilities is presented in the following table and was excluded from the data plots.
Trip Generation, 8th Edition 1813 Institute of Transportation Engineers
Land Use: 934
Fast-Fo* od Restaurant with
Drive -Through Window
Description
This category includes fast-food restaurants with drive -through windows. This type of restaurant
is characterized by a large carry -out clientele; long hours of service (some are open for breakfast,
all are open for lunch and dinner, some are open late at night or 24 hours per day); and high
turnover rates for eat -in customers. These limited -service eating establishments do not provide
table service. Non -drive -through patrons generally order at a cash register and pay before they
eat. High7turnover (sit-down) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant without drive -
through window (Land Use 933) and fast-food restaurant with drive -through window and no
indoor seating (Land Use 935) are related uses.
Additional Data
Users should exercise caution when applying statistics during the a.m. peak periods, as
the sites contained in the database ior this land use may or may not be open for breakfast.
In cases where it was confirmed that the sites were not open for breakfast, data for the
a.m. peak hour of the adjacent street traffic were removed from the database.
The'outdoor seating area is not included in the overall gross floor area. Therefore, the number of
seats may be a more reliable independent variable on which to establish trip generation rates for
facilities having significant outdoor seating.
One site indicated that a two-story play area and video arcade were included in the gross floor
area.
The sites were surveyed between the 1980s and the 2000s throughout the United States.
It has been speculated that hamburger restaurants may generate trips at a higher rate than
other.types of fast-food restaurants. The database was tested in an attempt to verify this
assumption; the data neither verified nor disproved it. Future research is needed in this
area.
Source Numbers
163,164,168,180,181,241,245,278,294,300,301,319,338,340,342,343,358,389,438,
502,552,555,577,583,584,617,640,641
1820 Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 8th Edition
9
Land Use: 935
Fast -Food Restaurant with *Ddve-Through Window
.and No Indoor Seating
Description
This category includes fast-food restaurants.with drivis-through service only. These facilities
typically have very small building areas and may provide a limited amount of outside seating.
These limited -service eating establishments usually do not provide table service. High -turnover
(sit-do�vn) restaurant (Land Use 932), fast-food restaurant without drive -through window (Land
Use 933) and fast-food restaurant with drive -through window (Land Use 934)'are related 'uses.
Additional Data
The sites were surveyed in the 1990s in Indiana and Kentucky.
-Source Nu'M'ber
404
k 0
0
Trip Qeneration, 8th Edition 1841 of Transportation Engineers
ECDC 23.40.320 Definitions pertaining to critical areas.
Streams" means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which
demonstrates clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The
channel or bed need not contain water year-round. This definition is not meant to include
irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices (drainage ditches) or other
entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or used to convey streams
naturally occurring prior to construction of such watercourse. Streams are further classified into
Categories S, F, Np and Ns and fishbearing or nonfishbearing 1, 2 and 3. [See ECDC
23.90.010(A)(1).]
ECDC 23.90.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas.
A. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas in the city of Edmonds include:
1. Streams. Within the city of Edmonds streams shall include those areas where surface
waters produce a defined channel or bed which �Iemonstrates clear evidence, such as the
sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The channel or bed need not contain water
year-round. Streams shall be classified in accordance with the Washington Department of
Natural Resources water typing system (WAC 222-16-030) hereby adopted in,its entirety
by reference and summarized as follows:
a. Type S:'streams inventoried as "shorelines of the state" under Chapter 90.58 RCW
and the rules promulgated pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW;
b. Type F: streams which contain fish habitat;
c. Type Np: perennial nonfish habitat streams; and
d. Type Ns: seasonal nonfish habitat streams.
All streams included on the inventory that are known to exist within the city of Edmonds
do not meet criteria for "shorelines of the state" b ut contain fish habitat and, thus, meet
designation criteria for Type F waters pursuant to WAC 222-16-030. However, not all
Edmonds streams support anadromous fish populations or have the potential for
anadromous fish occurrence because of obstructions, blockages or access restrictions
resulting from existing conditions. Therefore, in order to provide special consideration of
and increased protection for anadromous fish in the application of development standards,
Edmonds streams shall be ftirther classified as follows:-
Anadromous fishbearing streams: streams existing in whole or ' in part within the city of
Edmonds in which anadromous fish are known to occur. As of 2004, Edmonds fishbearing
r--- - --- I r- - -1
streams are known to include Willow `(-re-di, Shellabarger CTeek Shell Cieek. Hindley
,Cie Perrinville Creek, and Lunds and
Nonanadromous fishbearing streams: streams existing in whole or in part within the city of
Edmonds which do not support fish populations and do not have the potential for fish
occurrence because of barriers to fish passage or lack of suitable habitat.
Streams with anadromous fish occurrence were identified in the Edmonds Stream
Inventory and Assessment, a 2002 report of Pentec Environmental which is incorporated
by this reference as if herein set forth. The city of Edmonds advocates and encourages the
removal of barriers to anadromous fish passage consistent with the purposes and objectives
of this title. The director may provide updated information on the occurrence of
anadromous fish in Edmonds streams consistent with changes in existing environmental
conditions.
Determining Replaced Impervious Surface Area
(Small and Minor Sites Only) DRAFT
Is the Impervious
Area is NOT considered
Area being
REPLACED IMPERVIOUS
removed* and No
SURFACE. Go to Chart XX to see if
replaced" with a
area qualifies as NEW
new impermeable
surface?
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE,
Yes
Was impervious area
created prior to 7/7/1977
or prior to the date the
parcel was annexed
from Snohomish
County?
Yes I
R:I Is parcel
s
zoned
parcel
z ned
S g No
ingle-
Family
esidential?
Yes
Is the area a
driveway AND
is the replaced
impervious in
the same
footprint as the
existing
impervious?
Yes
Area is considered
EXEMPT REPLACED
impervious surface area
No
No
ea is considered
REGULATED
REPLACED
impervious
surface area
Removed = The removal of a building down to bare soil; the removal of any concrete, asphalt,
or other impervious surface to base soil, base.course, or the grinding of such surface
in -place or the rubblization of such surface.
Impervious surfaces that are removed for the sole purpose of installing utilities
or performing maintenance are not considered "replaced." -
RETURN ADDRESS
please print neatly or type information
Document Title(s)
STREET FILE
0m`099* 200201160099
01/16/2002 10:14 AM Snohomish
p.000� RECORDED County
Reference Number(s) of related documents:.
onal Reference Vs on page
Grantor(s) (Last, First, and Middle Initial)
Additional Grantors on page
Grantee(s) (Last, First, and Middle Initial)
Additional Grantees on page
Legal Description (abbreviated form: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range, quarteriquarter)
Assessor's Property Tax . Parcel/Account Number
="�4 IMMOMW Additional parcel 4�s page
The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the informat . ion provi . ded on this form. The staff will not read the
document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information provided herein.
*Signature required only if requesting Non -Standard document processing:
*1 am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW
36.18.010. 1 understand that the recording processing requirements may . -cover up,or otherwise
obscure some part ofthe text of,the original document.
Signature of Requesting Party
NO EXCISE TAX
REQUIRED
SANITARY SIDE SEWER EASEMENT JAN 16 2002
808 DMIlffl, S110P.011050 Miq ireasurer
0Y, 0QB.--PAN—TLN1-
The Grantor, CEDRIC E LINDSAY, a married man, for his separate estate, for and in
consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($ 10.00) and other valuable consideration, in hand paid,
conveys and warrants to DONALD A. JANGARD and LYNNE F. JANGARD, Husband and
Wife, a 10 foot wide easement for underground sanitary side sewer over that portion of Lot B,
City of Edmonds, Washington, Lot Line Adjustment No. LL-2000-74 Recording No.
20= ftZ5 ow? - the centerline of which is described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the common line between said Lot B and Lot D, said Boundary Line
Adjustment, which point is North 4204443" East 22.23 feet from the Northwesterly comer of said
Lot D, thence North 5e4l'West 60 feet, thence North I 00'West 28 feet, thence North 5AG
West 89 feet, thence North 4048' West 33 feet to a point on the existing 10 foot wide sanitary
sewer easement and end of side sewer easement.
TOGETHER WITH the right to enter said premises to maintain and/or repair said side sewer line.
Dated J — 12002
r
CEDRIC E. LINDSAY, a marrie4 man, for his separate estate
STATE OF WASHINGTON
ss
COUNTY
On this day personally appeared before me CEDRIC E. LINDSAY, a married man, for his
separate estate, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his fi-ee and voluntary act and deed for
the uses and purposes therein mentioned. -K
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this of ('k VWA 2002.
OFFICIAL SEAL (hinted name)
LINDA TUDOR
NOTARY PUBLIC-WASHINGTON Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residw at��g �v-,
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 15,
A:m 2005
20020'1160099
r-4
RETURN ADDRESS
& 0 ±-.
jr�!_Ia ox,
please print neatly or type information
Document Title(s)
A
200201160100
01/16/2002 10:14 AM Snohomish
p.0002 RECORDED County
Reference Number(s) of related documents:
Grantor(s) (Last, First, and Middle initial)
7M PIMM
0
Grantee(s) (Last, First, and Middle initial)
Additional Reference Vs on page _ -
Additional Grantors on page _
Additional Grantees on page
Legal Descript . ion (abbreviated form: i.e. lot, block, plat or section, township, range, . quarteriquarter)
.5hol ela WAI.
=4
Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number
Additional parcel WS on page
The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the
document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the i . ndexing information provided herein.
*Signature .. required only if reques I ting Non -Standard document processing:
*1 am requesting an emergency nonstan dard recording for an additional fee as provided in RCW
36.18-010. 1 understand that the recording processing requirements may -cover up �or otherwise
obscure some part of thetext of the original document.
Signature ot Kequesting Party
WATER LINE EASEMENT
NO EXCISE TAX
P F1 if) IJ I P r Ill
JAN 16 2oo2
608 00iiiii, snolloglisli --vulay Ifusurel
gy.-- BQ B DANTINI
The Grantors, DONALD A. JANGARD and. LYNNE F. JANGARD, Husband and Wife,
for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration, in hand
paid, convey and warrant to CEDRIC E. LINDSAY, a married man for his separate estate,
a 10 foot wide easement for underground water line over that portion of Lot D, City of Edmonds,
Washington, Lot Line Adjustment No. LL-2000-74, Recording No.200009275007, the centerline
of which is described as follows:
Beginning at. the Southwest comer of said Lot D: thence North 3 7 17' East along the Southerly
fine thereot 20 feet to the True Point Of Beginning: thence North 49*12' West 63 feet; thence
North 54"41' West 50.47.feet to the Northwesterly line of said Lot D at a point North 4244'43"
East 22.23 feet from the Northwesterly comer of said Lot D and� end of easement.
TOGETHER WITH the right to enter said premises to maintain and/or repair said water line.
//c-
Dated ;7- .2002
�iz
DONALD A JANAKARD
STATE OF. WASHINGTON
ss
COUNTY OF SNOHON1ISH
1001-r-12,
On this day personally appeared before me DONALD A- JANGARD and LYNNE F.
JANGARD, Husband and Wife, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary
act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this o?A10 day of 2002.
1- S
let. 0
Notary PV
�A%
t%OTA,9.,� 0% residing at
cP - "USLIC,
10
200201160100
for the State of
,R a A) 0 -z-
April 11, 2009
Michael Clugston
Planning Department
City of Edmonds
There is a large tree near the southwest comer of my property which poses a danger to the house
on 9714 Lindsay. Pl. This is to inform you that this tree is not on my property, 18910 Soundview
Pl. in Edmonds, and that I have no objection to the removal of that tree. I have looked at my
property map and measured my boarder and located a rebar marker which convinces me that the
tree is on the property of Dan Voetman, who has agreed to arrange for the removal of it.
Sincerely,
Alan Lindsay
18910 Soundview PI
Edmonds, WA 98020
�. ly
")C. IS9-
-STREET FILE �P_t.PAl Q�
PERMIT -NO: 98.51'
Cit of Edmonds
PERMIT EXPIRES1U1.Nj.e4r*4-
SIDE'SEWER PERMIT. I L)
Address of Construction: jl�W LTDI #
Property Tax Account Parcel No. (-976 e3 664 (Z-U or')
Attach copies of all access and utility easements N2sr- - Verified and Approved b
Owner and/or Contractor:
Contractor License #:-
N,,Single Family
ldingPermit#: 200+ '_62.07
W. U
Inva . sion into City *Right -of Way: El Yes 'E;k<o
Multi -Family (No. of Units *RW, Construction.Permit #
[__j Commercial (No. of Units Cross other, **Private Property: 'El V'e� '[*No
"Attach legal -description and.copy of recorded easement.
F] Public
Owne ntracto 1 4-
Owner or, contractor signature and� acknowl.edgemerit statem" 6nt: Date
signing for this permit I certify that - I . 'h 'a i ve� City*'s pu'blic,fi'and'out entitled
wer Specifications, and. ly d'ther
epiyde Se shall 66mp 'With all City requirernents outline ein.
9 CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-41fa5$55) BEFORUANY EXCAVATION 9
R FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 extensionimm
24 HOUR NOTICE REOUIRED FOR ALL INSPECTION REQUESTS
................. ......
. . ........
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
. . ..... ..... . . ........ ...
Permit Fee $ Repair Fee $ Issued By:
do!k )L& Date Issued:
Assessment Fee $
Receipt No:
City Perm! t Surcharge Fee _"M Total Fees Paid
NOTE: IF JOB SITE IS NOT READY FOR INSPECTION WHEN
INSPECTOR ARRIVES A $45 RE -INSPECTION FEE WILL BE CHARGED.,
Part! f141nKspecV6�n.L
Date: Initial:
ParUal Inspection: Date: Initial:
FINAL INSPECTION APPROVED: Date: SlzZ Initial: As-builtto Street File:,
t� PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE. t-
While Copy: File Green Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant
L,temp;bldg;forms;sspermitjlg4/00
1 1 0 F E.Dj,,,_
CITY, OF EDMONDS SIDE SEWER AS- BUILT I
ADDRESS HOMEOWNER
18916 SOUND VIEW PLACE
CONTRACTOR SCALE
Tom Braaten Construction NTS
DATE DRAWN PERMIT
7-14-2004 By K, Haney NO. 9851
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geotechnical Fngjnms� GeologIsis & Environmental Scictifists
Construclion Testing & 1CB0 / WABO InspWion Smices RECEIVED
June 7, 2005
SMEET HLE
Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
Subject: Geogrid Reinforced
Dear Mr. Braaten:
JUN - 8 2005
PERMIT COUNTER
Mechanically-,$-tabilized-E - arth-Wall Recommendations
t'i-tllil:,916-Soundyie�w-Plac*-- _J
Edmonds, Washington
Established 1975
E-10934
As requested, Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) is pleased to present this letter providing
Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall recommendations for the subject site. In preparing
our recommendations we visited the subject site to observe the general site conditions. This
letter presents a summary of our review and design recommendations for the MSE wall.
Project Description
The site currently is under the final stages of construction of a single-family residence. An
MSE retaining wall has been constructed to the west of the residence. The wall extends
from near the southwest property corner in a northeast direction toward the northwest
property corner. Near the northwest property corner the wall curves in an east -west direction
and extends along the north property line.
The north-west-f acing portion of the retaining wall consists of two tiers. The bottom tier is
approximately three feet tall. The upper tier is roughly 1.8 feet tall above the bottom tier and
is set back roughly 2.5 feet from the bottom tier. At the northwest corner of the retaining
wall, the base of the wall steps down in elevation, becoming a single tier and increases in
height,up to 5.5 feet above grade. At the north -facing portion of the wall the base of the
wall steps up in elevation and is less than four feet tall.
1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670
Other Locations
Fife
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
June 7, 2005 Page 3
The grade above the north-west-f acing portion of the retaining wall consists of a flat concrete
slab constructed as a base for the installation of pavers. Near the north end of the wall, the
grade above the wall consists of a set of stairs that descend to another flat, concrete slab
that makes up the grade above the north -facing retaining wall. The grade below the retaining
wall ranges from relatively level along the north-west facing portion of the wall, to
descending at an approximate gradient of 2H: 1 V (Horizontal:Vertical) at the northwest corner
of the wall.
A northwest facing, descending slope is located approximately eight feet to the northwest of
the northwest-f acing portion of the retaining wall. The slope descends approximately fifteen
feet at an approximate 1 H: 1 V gradient.
a,
Four hand borings were advanced at the base of the wall. Based on the soils encountered in
our hand augers, the base of the wall is underlain by two to six inches of crushed rock,
underlain by medium dense to dense silty sand to the extent of the hand borings. The soil
encountered at our hand borings should be suitable for support of the retaining wall.
ECI observed a geogrid layer extending from the wall at the northwest section approximately
1.5 to 2.5 feet above the base of the wall.
Approximately one foot of fill had been placed and compacted in front of the base of the
wall.
Discussion and Recommendations
Based on our review, in our opinion the IVISE walls can be constructed generally as
planned. Where the wall height exceeds four feet, the wall backfill should be reinforced
with a geogrid. Our design is based on the use of Fortrac geogrids. An equivalent type of
geogrid may be substituted by the builder, however as geogrid strengths vary from
manufacturer to manufacturer and by testing procedure. ' If an alternative geogrid is
planned for substitution, we should be contacted to review the substitute product before
ordering to verify it meets the minimum strength and testing requirements of the design
geogrid. A detail showing the IVISE wall construction and our MSE wall recommendations
is provided on Plate 1 .
Where a tiered wall is used, the upper tier should be set back from the lower tier by the
height of the lower tier.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
June 7, 2005 Page 3
Prior to construction of the wall, the contractor should clear and grub the wall alignment
and reinforced backfill zone. This process should include removing topsoil, vegetation,
duff, or other organic or deleterious material.
The base course of blocks should be placed on a six-inch thick, two -foot wide leveling
course of 5/8 inch, clean, crushed rock containing less than 5 percent fines.
The gravel placed within the modular block units should also consist of 5/8 inch, clean,
crushed rock containing less than 5 percent fines.
Our design does not provide for resistance against hydrostatic loading. In order to drain
the walls and prevent hydrostatic pressures from building up, the wall backfill should
include an 18-inch wide layer of free -draining gravel that extends along the entire height of
the wall. The gravel should consist of 5/8 inch, clean, crushed rock containing less than
five percent fines. A four -inch diameter perforated collector pipe should be placed at the
bottom of the free -draining gravel layer.
The geogrids should be placed in direct accordance with the manufacturer's
recommendations with specific consideration given to the proper orientation of the
geogrids. Splicing of the geogrid along the embedment length shall not be allowed. Prior
to placing fill, the geogrid reinforcement should be pulled tight to remove slack. This can
be accomplished by pulling the grids taught and holding them in place using stakes or
sandbags. The fill materials should then be placed from the back of the blocks towards the
tails of the geogrids to maintain tension in the geogrid. The geogrid lengths should be
placed side by side such that 100 percent coverage is achieved.
In no case should tracked equipment be allowed to pass over the exposed grids.
The native soil can be used as structural fill in the reinforced zone. The native soils primarily
consist of silt and silty sand. In our opinion, the native soils can be used as structural fill,
provided they are near their optimum moisture condition at the time of construction. If the
native soils are exposed to excessive moisture, they will degrade rapidly. Grading and
compaction will be difficult if the soil moisture increases significantly above its optimum
condition.
The structural fill between the geogrids should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding
12 inches in loose thickness. The fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the
maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Method D-1 557 (Modified Proctor).
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
June 7, 2005 Page 3
I imitntinil-_
Our recommendations have been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a
manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of
the profession currently practicing under conditions in this area for the exclusive use of Tom
Braaten Construction and their representatives. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the
information of the contractor.
We trust this information meets your needs. If you have any questions, please call.
I
Respectfully submitted,
EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Steve J. Scharf
Staff Geologist
k �N
0
qc� n
� 0.,t gjaikejim ___J _
Scott D. Dinkelman, LEG
Principal
SJS/SDD/lap
Attachment: Plate 1, Four -Foot Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall
Earth Consultants, Inc.
"Compact'
Blocks
(1 2"D x 8"H x 18"W)
Typical ,
12"
2
F-7`7
2'
6" Thick, 2'Wide
Crushed Rock Leveling
Coarse
GEOGRID PLACEMENT
2
CASE 1
4 FOOT WALL HEIGHT
Layer
Fortrac
Length
Geogrid
1
55/30-20
5
---------- i -------
Geogrid Reinforced
Structural Fill
(See Charts for
Grid Placement)
18" Wide
Drainage Layer
4" Diameter
Rigid PVC Perforated
Pipe
Structural
Fill
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Gcotechnical Engineering. Geology. Environmental Sciences
consirtiction Testing & 1030 / WABO Inspection Services
4'HIGH MECHANICALLY
STABILIZED EARTH WALL SECTION
18916 SOUNDVIEW PLACE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
DRWN. DNM
NO. 10934
CHKD. SJS
I DATE 6/6/05
PLATE 1
The City of Edmonds
APPLICATION
for
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS C]
OWNER ......... 4�.e..
---------------------------------------------
ADDRESS ........... ........ �.)./ ..........
. . . . . . . . . . . .
A PrA . OVED
JUN 3 1%8
EASEMENT No . .................... ...........
c- t Dt x �-/ '-'Zi
CONTRACTOR.... W. dC ....... .......................... .................................... PERMIT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............. ............
NAMEOF ADDITION .............. ...................................................................................
....... . .............
e�,00�-
Approved:
DATE
6 S Y ----
......................... 33��-
0000�-.
'000,000"",00,00,0"00�
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIV11C CENTER — WATEIt-SEWER DEPARTMENT Call FRospect 6-1107 when work
Is ready for Inspection. (No tnspcc�
tions Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N2 3016
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
18916 Sound View Place
ADDRESS --------------- . . ...................................................................
OjVNER .......... Suzanne.Li dsey. Esende Cont.
....... -------------- ----- ........ _ ............... . ................. CONTRACTOR ............................ ...... . ...........................................
Permission is granted ........................ J_ u- ... n ... e -------- �3�, 19 ... 68 fo . ... . .......
..... I ... . ....... days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
with City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
N No. I —Thee owners of the property may obtain a permit to construct sewer inside property
0 m line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
b ployed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
NOTE No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted.
90TE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
'_J-1 failure due to Improper work whIch may develop within one year of completion.
NOTE No. Sw—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than Is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appur-
tenanoes except to Insert the pipe Into the wye.
P
PLANNING DATA
NAME: \In
SITE ADDRESS: F-L21
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDEDIC�.Yes/ No)
MAP PAGE:304 CORNER LOT: (X@A4—ff0:D
FLAG LOT,!jj'ei,1 No)
ZONING: P-5— i,;Z CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #:
Study Required: X>% A A A A
LlWaiver 7
Ll Conditional Waiver
C H K#. C---�p
SEPA DETERMINATION:
Ll Fee
Ll Checklist
0 APO list w/ notarized form
(Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area- site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger)
Exempt
SETBACKS: (0/ 1 1 1
Required Setbacks: 9 0Q5 4 (1�5-
Street:—Left Side: — Right Side: Rear:
Actual Setbacks:
Street: Left Side: — Right Side: Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes No DNA)
L1 DETACHED STRUCTURES:
Ll ROCKERIES:
Ll FENCES/TRELLISES:
Ll BAY WINDOWS / PROJECTING MODULATION:
U STAIRS/ DECKS:
PARKING: Required��—Actual:'�� C�
LOT AREA: 8�3W5
LOT COVERAGE
rel
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Datum Point: 0
Datum Elevation: I(Zd- I
maximum Allowed: A (qP�-7 ',:�; Actui
A.D.U. CREATED,?(Nol/ Yes)
SUBDIVISION:--E=--..:>0>o0— —144
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATIO N ISSUED: (Yes /,.N'�D
OTHER
Plan Review By:
(L-4 &� -::
/s, 66. �'
173 P2 - �'
C-po -
NewBPP1an.ningDataFonn.D0C
RECEIVED
JAN 2 02006
PEBMIT CO�#TMA4
Aic-
.IB90
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: �4 U -0 0 1
BUILDING PERMIT #:-A,004 I
RECORDING #: ub nl-(� Q
ENCROACEMENT PERIVHT APPLICATION
PROPERTY OWNER NAME:
PROPERTY OWNER MAILIN
BUSINESS NAME (for Commercial applications):
BUSINESS OWNER NAME:
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC ENCROACHMENT:
E-
Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public space, City right-of-way or easement area
shall meet all Code Requirements as set forth in the following chapter of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
18.70 STREET USE AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
PERMIT ISSUANCE
An Encroachment Permit may be issued, at the discretion of the Development Services Director, City
Engineer or their respective designee, for permanent structures encroaching upon any portion of public.
space, City right-of-way or easement area , if the structures are placed in compliance with the above
referenced Code Section and the following criteria are met:
"7
1 . It has been concluded that the proposal will no ' t,adversely impact public space open to vehicular or
pedestrian travel;
2. Architectural Design Board approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved;
3. The proposal will. not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and
4. The proposal either benefits the public interest,'safety or convenience (e.g., supports or protects the City
street) or is an accessory structure such as a fence normally associated with residential use of the
property as fally complies with the requirements of Criteria 3 above.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ENCROACHMENT: (include total square footage of encroachment and givq._
specific location such as, 5' west of face of curb and 10'south of c/l of driveway entrance)-�R,—EAP --I-)1�770Y* b
Fliqsl* --/D"-74V&7-7 T62
CA/ WIES
'�h"� -1-�AgCZL
S:\Engr\Forms\Encroachment Application.doc i��ised 12/5/05
W
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the applicant to be of a temporary nature, revocable by
the City per ECDC 18.70.040 and that no vested right is granted. Applicant is responsible to provide a
copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each c,taendar ear, no lat han the 21s,
_C1
day of January- ATI 4 . 11V,:5 'F(f2i
17VDEMNIYY. The applicant understdh2dos�'an,,ldl hislher signature to this application, agrees to hold the
City of Edmonds harmlessfrom any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or description whatsoever,
foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against. the applicant or the City ofEdmonds, or any of its
departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense ofany legal proceedings including
defense costs, court costs, and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, the applicant
understands that halshe shall provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate
of insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, andproviding that it shall
be primary as to any other policy of insurance.
CODE APPLICATION: By signing the application below the applicant warrants that s1he has read or had
the opportunity to read Chapter 18.70 )f h nds Community Development Code and s1he
0'
t,e ;�o
understands that all )f the adopted ordpinance are incorporated herein as if setforth infull and this
applicatio permits ere re u ' ct to terms of those Chapters.
-SIGNATURE
DATE
--tropeA-00WHer
DEPARTMENT APPROVALS ***** FOR CITY USE ONLY
Date Rcv'd: by: U_'Cert. of Insurance verified by: K)Ar DateJ2MCD&
F-
@Public Works Approved by: Date
Remarks:
@Planning Division Approved
Remarks:
Da
*Engineering Division Approved by;. J Date— 1.760Q
Remarks: lr6al7ff e- CM, j%yo im i r ir Ai Qr�"'Y-.e awh,), sir.
Was 0, palic 06�
$ Permit Fees: L290+� St
$15 [Recordin Fees: I/page after Ir)
TOTAL FEE: $__ - Date Paid: - 1/4 ce Receipt No: M 0
L
Encroachment Agreement sent to City Clerk for recording — Date: By C,
I /Mo (t :
El Recorded"Copy Mailed to Owner — Date:
By:
SAEngr\Forms\Encroachment Application.doc
Revised 12/5/05
r
When recorded mail to:
City Clerk
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
CONFORMED COPY
200603151104 6 PGS
0311512006 4:33r 137 00
SNOHOMISH COUNT , AShINGTON
SPACE ABOVE THE LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
Assessor's Paircel. No.: V10751 SOO-412400
Applicant: _ \/N-+M iW in
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("A at") is entered into between the
CITY OF EDMONDS C'Cityl) and' ]��LkL
.("Owner[s]'), in accordance with Chapter 18.70 of the Edmonds Community Development
Code.
1. e ropertv. Oymer is the -owner of that certain realproperty located at
Vlctv -P44r_x5- within the City of Edmonds,
Washington, Assessor's Parcel Number —g:70-Y [3 06
and more particularly described as follows
LEGAL: SIZ, or
as described in Exhibit "A" attached -hereto ana incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Easement. The. City right-of-way adjacent to owner's property or. an
existing easement used for (strike those that don't apply) [ . . , - si&rwaH-:%
Aley,
sanitary sewer, waler, qtou�', od=-�
.3. The Encroachment The Owner desires,to encroach upon the public
.easement and the CIt h
y ereby—covenants.and a ees and. grants its permission to Owner to
a w
llo
to remain m. a portion of
the City. right-of-way/easement.. A -partial site plan, scaled 1 "�=2
0', showing the location of the
encroachment is -attached as Exhibit "B" and
incorpor2ted by reference., ThisAgreement is
subject to the following terms and conditions:
-lof4-
4"
a- On behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, the Owner promises to
maintain, repair, remove and/or replace the encroachment located in the easement
at their sole expense to the standards established by the'City. All main '
intenarice,
repair, removal and/or replacement shall be conducted solely at the Owners'
expense.
b. " The Owner, on behalf of themselves and their successors and 'assigns,
acknowledge that the City had no obligation to approve the encroachment within
the easement for the sole benefit of the Owner, and the agreements contained
herein, provide sufficient consideration for the Owner and their successors and
assigns to maintain, repair, remove and/or replace said encroachment located in the
easement at their sole expense in perpetuity.
c. , The Owner promises to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any loss, claim or liability of any kind or nature arising from
or out of its promises contained within this agreement, including any damage that
may be caused to the encroachment by . the City's operation, maintenance, repair,
replacement or other work related to construction activity within the easement
This promise to hold harmless and indemnify includes defense by counsel of the
City's choosing, the payment of reasonable attorney's fees and court'costs.
Nothing herein, however, shall be interpreted to require the Owner to indemnify
the City from the negligence or intentional tortuous act of its employees, officers,
or agents.
d. The Owner shall at the request of the City, promptly remove, repair, reconstruct,
and/or replace the encroachment at the Owners' sole expense. Upon receipt of
notification from the City that the City requires removal of all or portions of the
encroachment from within the easement, the Owner will promptly remove those
portions of the encroachment from within the easement area as required by the
City at their sole expense. If the portions of the encroachment required by the City
to be removed are not timely removed by the Owner, they shall be removed by the
City at the expense of the Owner, and the -Owner shall reimburse the City for the
costs of removal of the encroachment and disposal of materials as well as for any
increased construction costs or consequential damages incurred by the City due to
the Owners' delay. In the event that portions of the encroachment must be
removed to facilitate utility and/or construction activity by the City within the
easement or other requirements of the City� the Owner shall be solely responsible,
for replacement of the encroachment at their expense upon completion of the
utility and/or construction or other activity by the City.
- e. Whatever rights.and obligations were acquired by the City with respect to the
easements.hall remain and continue in full force and effect and shall in no way be
affected by City's grant of perniission. to construct and maintain the encroachment
structure.
-2 of4 -
or
f The property owner is required to provide and continually maintain during the
term of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the City as an additional
insured, with. respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any
other policy of insurance. A copy of the insurance certificate shall be provided to
the City at the, beginning of each calendar year, no later than the 2 1 " day - of
January.
4. En'tire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and replaces all other
agreements, oral or written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter. This
agreement may not be amended except in writing in a document filed of record with the
auditor of Snohomish County, Washington.
S. Notices. Anv notice which is required or may be given pursuant to this
Agreement shall be sent m writing by United States mail, first class, postage pre -paid,
registered or certified with. return receipt requested, or by other. comparable commercial
means and addressed as follows:
Kto the City: LCIo the Owner.
City Engineer
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Ed nonds, WA 98020
which addresses may be changed from time to time by providing notice to the other party in
the manner described above.
6. Waiver. City's consent to or approval of any act or omission by Owner'shall
not constitute a waiver. of any other default by Owner and shall not be deemed a waiver or
render unnecessary City's consent for approval to any subsequent act by Owner. A�ay waiver
by City of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other -'default
concerning the same or any other provision of the Agreement.
7. Termination of Agreement. In addition to any other remedy provided for by
law, the City re ' serves the right to terminate this agreement in the event the encroachment
negatively impacts or damages the City's easement and/or underlying utility systems or
violates any condition of service adopted by the City, at its sole discretion, as may be
necessary to prevent damage to the City's utility system, or any other public facility which
may be impacted by the Owners' failure to properly use the easement,
8. Successors and AsEiM This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors,.and assigns.
Owner agrees to incorporate this agreement by reference in any subsequent deeds to the
property, but any failure to do. so does not invalidate this provision.
-3 of 4 -
0 - 0
9. Capacity. Each party represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement
on behalf of such party has the authority to execute this Agreement and by such signature(s)
thereby bind such party.
IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this lk day
EWER-)T557
� _, WI'A
STATE OF WASHNGTON
COUNTY OF SNOHONUSH
This day, personally appeared before me &aW,2,)—k -e-
to me known to be the person(s) who executed t.66 wfthin and foregoing document and that
(helshelthey) signed the same as (hislherltheir) g&�— _ free a�d voluntary act
and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
OU
joy
4-
OF.
CITY
BY.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
—��jQA
6
Notary\�ublic
42r&n !!I, /J/_I, ve r
Typed or Printed Name
My Commission expires:
-4 of4 -
0
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Daniel and Margaret Voetmann
18916 Soundview PI
Edmonds, WA 98020
Parcel # 27031300412600
SEC 13 TWP 27 RGE 03 COM INT ELY R/W LN BNRR WITH N LN OF GOVT LOT
.3 SD INT BEING S88* 133W 895.44FT FR NE COR OF SD GOVT LOT 3 TH S37*
17W ALG SD ELY R/W LN 626.89FT TO SWLY COR OF TR OF LAND ESC
AF1330594; TH S52*43 OOE 48.62FT; TH S89*36 08E 126.16FT TO TPB; TH CONT
S89*36 08E 13.41FT; TH N88*33 OOE 14.00FT; TH S52*43 OOE 21.94FT; TH N42*44
43E 141.2.5FT TAP SWLYLN LOT 4 OF LINDSAY'S ADD; TH N38*41 OOW 59.78FT
TO SW COR SD LOT 4; TH S58*10 55W 15.00FT; TH N60*07 39W 144.42FT TO
ELY R/W LN SD BNRR; TH S37* 17 OOW ALG SD ELY R/W 90.00FT; TH S52*43
�OOE I I O.00FT; TH SO 1 *27 OOE 63.17FT TO TPB; PER CITY OF EDM LLA LL-2000-
�74 REC AF200009275007 '
V' FORr MAW
qftzo
04 Wml!�
Pt�N/O KC7 CP�f ��PV I
P&veT-`V 1911
A44, WA"-,!r,, AWP FAWW,
Illuig lo!�d
op- trop
-00 eAkmp 0451p, j
01F ft"
101 WITowl 3FwEa 41
x
I
N
FAVA
% 00 a*
MO
WAU,
PAvcr
Vw
-T5
0 PERMIT#:
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED: U,'&VQ
ADDRESS OF PUBLIC USE:
PROPERTY OWNER:
ONCE YOUR RE VIEW IS COMPLETE, PLEASE ROUTE TO THE NEXT
DIVISIONIDEPARTMENT ON THE LIST.
* * * PLEASE ROUTE IN THE ORDER SHOWN * * *
PLANNING DIVISION Date Stamp Received: tltc,
r-1 PUBLIC WORKS
F� ENGINEERING DIVISION
Ej DS ADMINISTRATION
Date Stamp Received:
Date Stamp Received:
Date Stamp Received:
-lf� �74
tea
Rw
w="7
Of�ii�i"N'iV)i4�SANDI�tkARItSSW ARE ""TO B��,�
UNDER THE "'DEPARTMENTAPPROVALS"SECTIONON THE PERMIT ati&�
RAengr\fbrms\Encroachment pemit routing
Message Pagel of4
McConnell, Jeanie
From: McConnell, Jeanie
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:27 PM
To: 'Dan Voetmann'
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; Bowman, Duane
Subject: Patio Encroachment Permit
Dan,
On the fourth page of the encroachment agreement the signature of Margret Voetmann and your last name in the
notary section extend into the right margin. A 1" margin is to be maintained on these documents or they will get
denied for recording. I have attached for you a blank encroachment agreement and only need for you to
complete and return a new page 4. We do have a notary on staff if you find it more convenient to complete the
document at our office.
Thank you,
Jeanie
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Voetmann [maiIto:danv@dest-mark.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:36 PM
To: McConnell, Jeanie
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; Bowman, Duane
Subject: RE: Patio Encroachment
Jeanie,
I appreciate your advice. Form #E26 looks like a "fill in the blanks" form so I will do my best to fill it out
legibly and in the largest size print that fits in the spaces. I will fill out both the Application and the
Agreement forms. I have the assessment # and the site plan illustrates all the legal descriptors of the
perimeter of the property. I will do my best to give you what I understand you need (as I indicated to
Duane I am a rookie at this), but if I end up lacking anything I will follow through to provide you with
everything to your satisfaction.
Thanks,
Dan
"The fruit of love is service. The fruit of service is peace. And peace begins with a smile."
Mother Teresa
----- Original Message -----
From: McConnell, Jeanie [mailto:Mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Dan Voetmann
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; Bowman, Duane
Subject: FW: Patio Encroachment
Dan,
Please note there is an Encroachment Permit Application as well as an Encroachment Agreement,
1/27/2006
Message Page 2 of 4
9 0
which requires a couple of exhibits. The agreement and exhibits will be recorded, so please be
sure to follow County recording requirements for font size and margins.
Exhibit A will be the property legal description and is only necessary if it does not fit in the space
provided on the agreement.
Exhibit B is a partial site plan showing the encroachment area. This site plan is different than the
complete, revised site plan that is to be submitted to Theresa Umbaugh. The main difference
being that Exhibit B will need to follow the recording requirements.
Please let me know if you have any questions while completing these documents.
Regards,
Jeanie McConnell
----- Original Message -----
From: Bowman, Duane
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:50 AM
To: 'Dan Voetmann'
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: RE: Patio Encroachment
Dan,
Better to ask up front! My responses to your questions:
#1 Yes.
#2 Your check will be made out to the City of Edmonds.
#3 Just let the receptionist know and she will get Theresa to help you. Do not just drop off
the application.
Duane Bowman
Development Services Director
425 771-0220 FAX 425 771-0221
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Voetmann [mailto:danv@dest-mark.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:47 AM
To: Bowman, Duane
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: RE: Patio Encroachment
Hi Duane,
I apologize for what are probably three stupid questions but I have no experience in
this sort of thing and want to make sure I do everything properly the first time.
#1 Am I correct in understand that all you need from me is form #E26 (that you gave
me a link for --the "Encroachment Permit Submittal Requirements") filled out (except
for the insurance information) and three copies of the plan the architect drew up
illustrating the encroachment?
#2 I'll bring a check for the permit and recording fees (I'm not sure how many pages
you'll need to file so I'll bring a blank one and hopefully someone can tell me how
much to make it out for). Do I make it out to "The City of Edmonds"?
#3 Do I need to ask the receptionist to introduce me to Theresa or Jeanie or do I
simply leave the documents for them?
Thank you.
Dan
1/27/2006
,N4essage Page 3 of 4
"There is more to life than increasing its speed."
Wahatma Gandhi
From: Bowman, Duane [mailto:Bowman@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:39 AM
To: Dan Voetmann
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: RE: Patio Encroachment
Dan,
You can come in and submit whenever it is convenient for you. Let the receptionist
know that you are submitting information on your patio permit. Theresa Umbaugh is
the Permit Coordinator for this permit and Jeanie McConnell handles the
encroachment permit.
Duane Bowman
Development Services Director
425 771-0220 FAX 425 771-0221
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Voetmann [malito:danv@dest-mark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:01 PM
To: Bowman, Duane
Subject: RE: Patio Encroachment
Hi Duane,
I thought it was going to be simple to get a drawing verifying the changes we
discussed ... but after Christmas the builder went on vacation then when he got
back the architect was gone to a convention. However, as of today I have a
set of drawings that show the south wall moved in, the concrete removed back
to the 10 foot line, the pavers on sand out to the 3.3 foot line, everything in
front of that as flower beds, the landscaping walls as dry -fit block on a sand
foundation only, and nothing past the ten foot line that is permanent or
adhered in any way. I will bring that plan along with the other paperwork you
sent, including the signed agreement with the city, whenever it is convenient
for you. I can come by your office tomorrow afternoon any time after 2p, any
time Thursday afternoon after 3p or anytime Friday before 1 lam or after 3pm.
Thank you,
Dan
There is no such thing as a self-made man. We are made up of thousands of others.
Everyone who has ever done a kind deed for us, or spoken one word of
encouragement to us, has entered into the makeup of our character and our thoughts,
as well as our success.
George Matthew Adams
----- Original Message -----
From: Bowman, Duane [mailto:Bowman@ci.edmonds.wa.us]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:15 AM
1/27/2006
klessage Page 4 of 4
To: Dan Voetmann
Cc: Umbaugh, Theresa; McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: Patio Encroachment
Dan,
We need to finalize the patio per our discussions. Attached is a link to
an encroachment permit form that has been modified to reflect
encroaching into easements. Will need to submit a revised plot plan
that shows the allowable encroachment at the proper height as we
discussed with the encroachment permit application. The City will
waive the insurance requirement as this is property where there is no
public access. Please complete the application and submit it to the
city by next Friday January 20, 2005.
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/CityDepartments/EnqrDept
-Encroachment Permit Submittal Requirements.pdf
Duane Bowman
Development Services Director
425 771-0220 FAX 425 771-0221
1/27/2006
McConnell, Jeanie
From:
McConnell, Jeanie
Sent:
Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:31 AM
To:
Bowman, Duane
Cc:
Umbaugh, Theresa; Gebert, David
Subject:
Rl�: Voetman retaining wall application 05-237
Duane,
Thank you for the update. We have revised our Encroachment Permit agreement to incorporate the language that was
previously put together for the Pinneo and Hertl properties. I think it would be appropriate at this time to go ahead and use
the Encroachment Permit process for approving the wall/patio. Public Works and Planning are both involved in the review
process of Encroachment Permits and the City Engineer signs the agreement that gets recorded. Everyone that would
have concern with this will be able to review the revised plan through this process.
Jeanie
----- Original Message -----
From: Bowman, Duane
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:20 AM
To: Umbaugh, Theresa
Cc: McConnell, Jeanie
Subject: RE: Voetman retaining wall application 05-237
I reached an agreement with Voetmann on his patio. He is going to modify the patio to project only 3.3 feet into the
setback and make sure it is built out of stacked blocks and not permanent in nature. He will also sign our agreement
to move it should the city ever come in to build in the easement. He will submit a revised plan. Noel miller agreed to
this solution.
Duane Bowman
Development Services Director
425 771-0220 FAX 425 771-0221
----- Original Message -----
From: Umbaugh, Theresa
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Bowman, Duane
Subject: Voetman retaining wall application 05-237
Duane,
Technically this application expired on 12/8/05. We are pending your decision/determination. Is there anything
you'd like me to follow-up on or do for this application?
Theresa M. Umbaugh
Permit Coordinator
Development Services Department
City of Edmonds
Hours M-F, 9am-12pm and 1pm-4pm
(425) 771-0220
k InC
Ctors'
Job # 1670=2 724
My 20, 2004
DEAD END STREET
HCKV#aulaM DEVICE WACWG
WH WR VNGENi
Sam AD so
35r45 30 60
25J30 20
r.
1. An signs and spacing to cOnfOrrn
,to the MUFCD and CltY Of EdMOnd'
Traffic Control specs.
2. Chonnell7lng devices — 28'
traffic cones.
3. AD signs are 48' x. 48' B/O unless
otherwise specified.
4. Alert affected businesses &
residents.
5. work to take place between
9 a.m. And 4 p.m.
6. 1 Flogger will control alternating
one lone traffic.
. rLEGEND
r
28' TRAFFIC Care
W(W AREA
TRAFFICFLOW
ARRUWBOARD
ER
FLAGGER
IS*" UG44T
qo�
loz ez
105 29�
A -,I c'. - op 00(v
0,
102
�07
52.
53 /
SCALE.
HHS INC.
Land Surveying
12855 NE 146TH PL.
KIRKLAND, WA.
98034 425-864-0944
9
CONSTRUCDON SURVEY
18916 SOUND VIEW PLACE
TOM BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
5TREET FILE
5
akcil'��ED
APR - 12004
PERMIT COUNTER
(07
41
eo -00 1
it7'p�-m fewer
AO
5A V
AS
0/0 1 V
-7�77-7
S
October 12, 1967
City of Edmonds
Att: Leif Larson, City Engineer
Genticmen:
This is to advise that in connectionwith the 4 Lot subdivisionwe
own at 18916 Sound View Place, we have requested Reid Middleton and Associates
to prepare a legal description and deed for transfer of the 101 strip abutting
71
Sound View Place. As soon as it is drawn up we Yr.11-11 execute the deed and —
transfer ownership of the strip to theCity.
In order to compiete requirements for final ap roval of the sub—
division we also agreed to provide a 151 easement and blacktop a 101 road
across the back of Lot 5 of Lindsay's Addition to provide access to Lot A of
the subdivision. We are quite willing to do this whenever the lot is sold or
in the event that we Vaild a house for either of us on it. At present we do
not anticipate sale or development for several years. Ke are advised that
blacktop which is unused soon deteriorates due to plant growth up through the
asphalt. We wish to avoid having to place blacktop twice on the same road and
therefore propose the following:
I. At the tJ 'me of sale of Lot 5 of Lindsay's Addition
we will include in the deed a 151 easement to Lct A.
2. At the time of sale or application for building permit
on loot A, we will complete the 101 road across Lot 5
and blacktoD it.
Ne would anpreciat-e your favorable consideration of the request.
Yours very truly,
Cedric E.Iindsay
E. Suzanne Lindsay
r.
VA
44
alms
C', /V
vh POW
F
IQ
y"
NC,
Cb 0
rlu
90
-ez!
N,
OODD
AV, it:: 1A "I.?-?
h
-�"f hi,
F�V/,5/oiv PR
-T VVD.5,4 Y,
..!r. ye.
127MC '9'�F
N Oe p(I k; 1191,
VI 41% 1 A SSOCIAIL
�..17 174;
I
13
10
CEDRIC LINDSAY
2
z
-SU
D�S I w
y F? A C I S�
IS T" .7 7
L. K
�,u E ul: 4 4.
sw
ill SY ST
FAI -
777—
VA
it
R
0 N w
3t
"I �TN �11, jci�
M.:
T R A
to ....
it
.. ........
of.
DEC-31-0001 04:26 FROM TO 7710221 P.01
Ao
bum,
ua** I"'.
744 -v
Jim.
. iteuvo
;C"a
A=
7. -cum
bovp -
1W.
A6,
. %*iwi4
" 0 "' 0 Iq tho
-'ho
ifi i
Alt, �W
06Y lie
tot
-A V.�f
Inc
PIP
I tL
Pt Vs W
61,
E
HAS CW*Je 69, U-65 D25
t $e
(5- -ro -Fti:f, 1-0 VAD 6y)
Url- twe fpps�� Ix, 4&+ AAW�m 9wa
# Ls 779 - LGII I
DEC-31-0001 04:25 FROM TO 7710221 P.02
W41'
...... .....
7�- 17
ooirl-,
AMC
."7B
L!E
jw�
4".
. ... ..... .
j
y4l'.
TOTAL P.02
ECEIVED
R 112003
e7 PE IT COUNTER
PE El
d7r-ff-
9'9-'7,r 007
RE 6.
7.
D�tl
-eme'e. a-vwr.
v",
lecobvc.
V too
40
S"r45 4le/I
. �,; w
ik
WQ
r
jr
CA TIC IH MO/
SA L i M
D
08's t
c
40
sl
. seet'Br.,06, 0
estdr, ICOR
NO. A
ce
J,
All No 7'46
.........
monuay, rew, ud, Y 4o,
A
Attention:
Dave Watkins
Company:
Windermere
Fax Number:
1-425-776-8122
Voice Number:
4 25:,� �4
F r 4o. To I m Braaten . .
ow
C pany: T@m Braa �on
Fax Number: 425-637-1410
Voice Number: 425-637-2663
Date: 2/23/2004
Number of Pages: 3
? C-;,
Inc.
Subject: Voetmann's Buildine Permit
Comments:
Hl Dave, Please call me ASAP
Thanks, Tom
OU
I*
City of Edmonds
Public Works
phone (425) 771-0235 fax (425)
FAX COVER SHEET
Date:
2-25-04
To;
LYLE
(name)
ENGINEERING
(ohganization)
Fax Number.
Number of Pages (including cover
8
From:
CHAD
(name)
SEWER
(division) i I
Comments: i
T.V SHEETS YOU REQUESTED THE MANHOLE NUMBEKb AKt ON
SHEET 1 OF SEWER MAPS
City of Edmonds PubUc Works 711 . 0-2leSLSW Edmonds,798=
lzl-� 100'd 980-1 2909-M-M SPU01*3i 10 AI!3-fl0dA Ad98:Z0 VOOMMU
1' POLY 160 PS
LLJ
ry
r-)
< -7'
> DRIVEWAY 3)'
ol
n :�
1. 721 1 5'
5`�4
145kTO ANOTHER PROPERTY
SOUNDVIEW PL
CITY OF EDMONDS WATERLINE AS —BUILT
ADDRESS WATERLINE NO,
18916 SOUNDVIEW PL 2000-0365
CONTRACTOR HOMEOWNER SCALE
UNKNOWN LINDSAY NTS
DATE INSPECTED INSPECTED BY DATE DRAWN DRAWN BY
12/14/01 1UNKNOWN 7/5/06 J. BRONDER
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY -RESIDENCE
1891.6 SOUNDVIEW PLACE
.EDMONDS# WASHINGTON
REECEIVEEL)
E-10934
r td - 9 2004
PERMIT
COUNTER
January 23, 2004
PREPARED FOR
TOM�BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION
CITY.Copy
Rie'eL
9
St. !t!,QA.kqIp
Sist
4,
,F WAS& t*
0
Iwo` C_
n -33182 ��'P
3 02 09
KrIstina M. Weller, P.E.
Project Manager.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
h
1805 136' Place Northeast, Suite 201
Bellevue, Washington 98005
A425) 643-3780
Tollfree 1-888-739-6670
i
I
16 IMPORTANT INFORKOON
ABOUTYOUR
I
I
I
P�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNiCAL ENGINEERING REPORT
More construction problems are caused by site subsur-
face conditions than any other factor As troublesome as
subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent
have been lessened considerably in recent years, due in
large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/
The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in
the Geosciences.
The following suggestions and observations are offered
to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays.
cost -overruns and other costly headaches thatcan
occur during a construction project.
A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIOUE SET
OF PROJECT -SPECIFIC FACTORS
A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur-
face exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique
set of project -specific factors. These typically include:
the general nature of the structure involved, its size and
configuration; the location of the structure on the -site
and its orientation; physical concomitants such as
access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities,
and the level of additional risk which the client assumed.
by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory
program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the
geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors
which change subsequent to the date of the report may
affect its recommendations.
Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates
otherwise. your geotechnical engineering report should not
be used:
• When the nature of the proposed structure is
changed, for example, if an office building will be
erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refriger-
ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre-
frigerated one;
• When the size or configuration of the proposed
structure is altered;
• when the location or orientation of the proposed
structure is modified;
• when there is a change of ownership, or
• for application to an adjacent site.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems
which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid-
ered in their report's development have changed.
MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS"
ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions
only at those points where samples are taken, when
they are taken. Data derived through sampling and sub-
sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo-
technical engineers who then render an opinion about
overall subsurface conditions, -their likely reaction to
proposed construction activity, and appropriate founda-
tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual
conditions may differ from those inferred to exist,
because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how
qualified, and no subsurface exploration program, no
matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by
earth, rock and time. The actual interface between mate-
rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report
indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may
differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the
unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their
impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their
geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden-
tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be
needed, and to recommend solutions to problems
encountered on site.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
CAN CHANGE
Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly -
changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi-
neering report is based on conditions which existed at
the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions
should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose
adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo-
technical consultant to learn if additional tests are
advisable before construction starts.
Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and
natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground-
water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions
and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical
report. The geotechnical engineer should be kept
apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to
determine if additional tests are necessary
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE
PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES
AND PERSONS
Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet
the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre-
pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade-
quate for a construction contractor, or even some other
consulting civil engineer Unless indicated otherwise,
this report was Orepared expressly for the client involved
and'expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use
by any other persons for any purpose, or by the client
for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi-
vidual other than the client should apply this report for its
intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical
engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose
other than that originally contemplated without first conferring
with the geotechnical engineer
Earth.Mnsultants, Inc.
Gmt(vhnioal Fn�hn(xT,, Gcolop's(s EStablislied 1975
0)nstrtK:fi(X1T(�,1i11�f& IMO/WAM) 111.4X'(1i011S<TVi((�S
January 23, 2004 E-1 0934
Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
� I
Dear Mr. Braaten:
Earth Consultants., Inc.. (ECI) is pleased to submit this report titled "'Geotechnical
Engineering Study, Proposed Single -Family Residence, 18916 Soundview* Place,
Edmonds, Washington". This report presents the results of our field exploration,
selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses.
In general, our field explanation indicates the site is underlain by medium dense to very
dense silty fine to medium sand with gravel. Based on our study, in our opinion, the
proposed residence can be supported on a conventional foundation system bearing on
competent native soil.or structural fill. SI.ab-on-grade floors can be similarly supported.
ECI appreciates this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or
need further assistance, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC.
Kristina M. Weller, P.E.
Project Manager
SSR/SDD/KMVV/csm
U
1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, WA 98005
Bellevue (425) 643-3780 FAX (425) 746-0860 Toll Free (888) 739-6670
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E-10934
PAGE
INTRODUCTION........................................ * ...... ........ ; ............ 1
General........................................................................................................ 1
Project Description ........................................................................................ 2
2
SITECONDITIONS .............................................................................................
Surface........................................................................................................ 2
Subsurface.................................................................................................... 3
Groundwater................................................................................................. 4
LaboratoryTesting ........................................................................................ 4
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 15
General........................................................................................................ 5
Site Preparation and General Earthwork ............................................................. 5
Foundations.................................................................................................. 7
Slab -on -Grade Floors ...................................................................................... 8
RetainingWalls .............................................................................................. 8
Seismic Design Considerations ........................................................................ 9
GroundRUDture ......................................................................................... 9
Liquefaction............................................................................................. 9
Ground Motion Response ........................................................................... 10
Fxr-auatinns and Sinnas ................................................................................. 10
SiteDrainage ................................................................................................
Utility Support and Backfill ............................................................................
LIMITATIONS...................... ? ............................................................................ 12
AdditionalServices ....................................................................................... 12
I r— I
I
IEarth Consultants, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued
E-10934
ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate 1 Vicinity Map
Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan
Plate 3 Retaining Wall Drainage and Backfill
Plate 4 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail
APPENDICES
Appendix A Field Exploration
Plate Al Legend
Plates A.2 through A4 Test Pit Logs
Appendix B Laboratory Test Results
Plates 131 Grain Size Analyses
Earth Consultants, Inc.
77
h
F1
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
18916 SOUNDVIEW PLACE
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
E-10934.
INTRODUCTION
General
This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by
Earth Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the proposed single-family residence, 18916
Soundview Place, Edmonds, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on
the Vicinity Map, Plate1.
The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at- the site and,
based on the conditions encountered, develop geotechnical recommendations for the
proposed site development. Our scope of services included an evaluation of the -
following:
Site geologic setting, including a description of the subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions and their influence on the proposed development;
0 Grading, earthwork, fill compaction, drainage, cut and fill slopes, stripping,
proofrolling, and other site development recommendations;
A description of suitable fill soils, as well as the suitability of the on -site soils
for use as fill;
Design criteria for shallow foundations including minimum width and depth
requirements and allowable design bearing pressures for shallow footings;
0 Depth of frost penetration and effect; and
0 Seismic design parameters.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
I
I
11
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 2
Project Description
ECI understands it is planned to re -develop the site by demolishing the existing. single-
family residence and replacing it with a new residence. The new residence will have a
larger footprint than the existing building, but will maintain the same grades as much
as possible. At the time this. study was performed, the site, proposed residence and
our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on. the Test Pit Location Plan,
Plate 2.
Based on our experience with similar projects, antici pated wall loads for the proposed
residence will be in the range of 2 to 3 kips per lineal foot, column loads in the range of
10 to 20 kips, and slab -on -grade floor loads of 150 pounds per square foot (psf).
We anticipate the proposed residence will be constructed near existing site grades
using a crawl -space basement, and/or a slab -on -grade floor with cuts and fills of less
than five feet.
If the above project description is incorrect or the project information changes, ECI
should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make
modifications, if needed.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The subject site is located at 189.16 Soundview Place, Edmonds, Washington (see
Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The site is roughly rectangular in shape, with an area of
approximately one-half acre. The site is currently developed with an abandoned single-
family residence surrounded by a yard and landscaping. The site, is bordered to the
north and east by developed residential parcels, to the south by a residential parcel and
access street frontage, and to the west by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
railroad line.
The site is vegetated with a mixture of grass landscaping and sparse trees.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 3
The existing topography slopes very gently to the west, with approximately five feet of
elevation change across the, width of the- site. There is a creek channel that trends
east to west along the northern site boundary. The channel elevation is approximately
ten feet below the developed portion of the site. There is a bluff along the western
site boundary that descends approximately ten feet to the BNSF line.
Subsurface
Subsurface conditions were evaluated by excavating three test pits at the site to a
maximum depth of nine feet below existing grades at the approximate locations shown
on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A4, for a more detailed
description of the conditions. encountered at'each location explored. A description of
the field exploration methods is included in Appendix A. The following is a generalized
description of the subsurface conditions encountered.
At all our test pit locations, approximately four inches of topsoil was encountered. The
topsoil was characterized by its dark brown color and organic content. Under no
circumstances should the topsoil be.used as, or mixed into, structural fill.
Underlying the topsoil, in all our test pit locations, medium dense, grading to very
dense, silty sand with gravel (Unified Soil Classification SM) was encountered
extending to the maximum exploration depth of nine feet.
Review of the geologic map for the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West
Quadrangles indicates the site is immediately underlain by Olympia Gravel deposits.
These deposits are characterized by fluvial sands and gravels with localized oxidation
and cementation, deposited prior to the Fraser Glaciation.
IOur field exploration generally correlates with this geologic designation.
I
I
I
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 4
IGroundwater
No groundwater seepage was encountered at the time of the subsurface exploration,
(December 2003). Based on the limited amount of grading required to achieve footing
elevation, groundwater seepage is not anticipated to adversely impact site
development. However, the contractor should be made aware that groundwater is not
static. There will be fluctuations in the level depending on the season, amount of
rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher,
and seepage rate is greater, in the wetter fall and winter months (typically October
through May).
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to. verify or
modify the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and
engineering characteristics of the soil encountered. Visual field classifications were
supplemented by grain size analyses on representative soil samples. Moisture content
tests were performed on all samples. The results of laboratory tests performed on
specific samples are provided either at the appropriate sample depth on the individual
est pit logs, or on a separate. data sheet contained in Appendix B. It is important to
note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in -situ soil
t
conditions. Geotechnical recommendations provided in this study are based on
interpretation of these test results. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of
these data by others.
In accordance with the Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples
for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen (15) days following completion
of this report unless directed otherwise in writing.
I
I
I
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 5
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
Based on the results of this study, in ECI's opinion, the proposed residence can be
constructed generally as planned. Support for the new residence can be provided using
a conventional spread and continuous footing, foundation system bearing on competent
native soil or structural fill. Competent native soil, capable of providing adequate
support for the residence, was encountered at approximately 18 inches below existing
grades. Slab -on -grade floors can -be similarly supported. Any organic or unsuitable
soils encountered during the excavation for the building foundation, pads or walkways
should be removed and replaced with a granular structural fill.
This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a
manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily. exercised by" other
members of the profession currently. practicing under similar conditions in this area for
the exclusive use of Tom Braaten Construction and their representatives. No warranty,
expressed or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the
project contract documents for the information of the contractor.
Site Preparation and General Earthwork
The building area should be stripped and cleared of surface vegetation, organic matter,
existing structures and other deleterious materi.al. The existing concrete foundation
can be used as structural fill provided it is reduced to a maximum grain size of four
inches and that it is mixed with other moisture conditioned granular soils prior to
placement.
Following the stripping operation, a representative from ECI should observe the ground
surface where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavern,ents are to be placed. Soil in
loose or soft, areas, if recompacted and still, yielding, should be overexcavated and
replaced with a granular structural fill. A woven geotextile fabric may also be used to
stabilize the overexcavation surface. For this application, a woven geotextile such as
Mirafi 60OX or an equivalent material can be placed directly on the subgrade. The
geotextile should be used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 6
Any organic -rich soils exposed during excavations that will be under structural
elements such as foundations, building pads or pavement/walkway areas, are not
suitable for building support and will require removal and replacement with an approved
granular, non -organic structural fill.
There are several existing underground utility lines beneath the site. Underground
utilities that will be abandoned should be plugged or removed. and replaced with
structural fill.
Structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, floor slabs,
pavements, or other load -bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs, footings and
pavements should. be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in
loose thickness. Fill placed under footings should be compacted to 90 percent of
maximum density determined in accordance with ASTM D1557-91 (Modified Proctor)
except for the top twenty-four (24) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of
maximum dry density. Fill placed under slabs -on -grade, pavements, and walks should be
compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches
which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density.
During dry weather, most granular soils, which are compactable and non -organic, can
be considered for use as structural fill. Based on the results of laboratory tests, the
native silty sand with gravel soils, at the time of our exploration, appear to be near or
above their optimum moisture content. Due to. the fines content of the on -site soils,
they are moderately moisture sensitive and may.degrade rapidly if exposed to moisture
and heavy traffic. Therefore, moisture conditioning of the on -site soil may be
necessary prior to use as structural fill depending on the conditions at the time of
placement. Laboratory testing indicates the native silty sand with gravel soils have
moisture contents in the range of 3 to 9 percent.
If imported structural fill is necessary, a non -organic, compactable, granular soil with a
maximum grain size of four inches can be c onsidered for use during dry weather
conditions. Fill for use during wet weather or in wet subgrade conditions should
consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum grain size of four
inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus
3/4-inch fraction. A contingency in the earthwork budget should be include d for this
possibility.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
7L
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 7
IFoundations
I
I
I
I
I
P
I
I
11
11
I
I
I
I
The proposed residence should be supported on a conventional spread and continuous
foundation system bearing on competent native soil or structural fill. Concrete slabs can
be similarly supported. Competent native soil capable of providing adequate foundation
support was encountered at approximately 18 inches below existing grade.
Loose or organic soil encountered during site grading activities that will be under
structural areas. such as the building foundation, pavement and walkways, should be
removed and replaced with a granular structural fill as necessary. An ECI
representative should be on -site during the foundation excavation operations to assess
subgrade conditions.
Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of eighteen (18)
inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a
minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, or on competent soils
exposed in the crawl space surface. Continuous and individual spread footings should
have minimum widths in accordance with applicable building codes.
With,foundation support obtained as described, an allowable soil bearing capacity of
two thousand five hundred (2,500) psf can be used for design. Loading of this
magnitude would be provided with a -theoretical factor -of -safety in excess of three
against shear failure. For short-term dynamic loading conditions, a one-third increase in
the above allowable bearing capacities can be used.
With structural loading as expected, and provided the above design criteria is followed,
total settlement in the range of one inch is anticipated, with differential settlement of
about three-quarters of one inch. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur
during construction as dead loads are applied.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
Ll
0 0
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 8
Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the
supporting soil and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the
foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against the competent
native soils or backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.35
can be used. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using
an equivalent fluid pressure 'of three hundred fifty (350) pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor -of -safety of 1.5 has been
included * As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize -full passive
resistance, the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not
acceptable or the grade adjacent to the. foundation is steeper than 5H:1V
(Horizontal:Vertical).
Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of ECI, prior to placing forms
or rebar, to verify that soil conditions are as anticipated in this report.
Slab -on -Grade Floors
Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on competent native soil or structural fill.
Loose or unstable subgrade soil must be either recompacted or over -excavated and
replaced with structural, fill.
The slab should be provided with a capillary break consisting of a minimum of four
inches of free -draining sand or gravel. A vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic
membrane should be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be
placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the
concrete.
Retaining Walls
Retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the
retained soils. Walls that are designed to yield can be designed to resist the lateral earth
pressures imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty-five (35) pcf. If
walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, the equivalent fluid weight
should be increased to fifty (50) pcf. These values ' are based on horizontal backfill and
the assumption that surcharges due to backfill slopes, hydrostatic pressures, traffic,
structural loads or other surcharge loads will not act on the wall. If such surcharges are
to apply, they should be added to the above design lateral pressure. The foundation
bearing, passive pressure, and friction coefficients previously provided in the foundation
section are applicable to retaining walls.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 9
To reduce the potential for hydrostatic forces building up behind the walls, retaining walls
should be backfilled with a column of suitable free -draining material such as pea gravel or
washed rock extending at least eighteen (18) inches behind the wall. The remainder of
the backfill should consist of structural fill. A perforated drain pipe should be placed at
the base of the wall and should be surrounded by a minimum of one cubic foot per lineal
foot with three -eighths inch pea gravel. The perforated pipe should consist of a rigid,
smooth wall pipe such as schedule 40 PVC or SDR 35 pipe. A typical retaining wall
backfill detail is attached as Plate 3.
Seismic Design Considerations
The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 in.the 1997 Uniform Building Code
(UBC). Earthquakes occur in the Puget Lowland with regularity However, the majority
of these events are of such low magnitude they are not felt without instruments.
Large earthquakes do occur, as indicated by the 1949, 7.2 magnitude earthquake in
the Olympia area and the 1965, 6.5 magnitude earthquake in the Midway area and the
2001, 6.8 magnitude earthquake in the Nisqually area.
There are three potential geol ogic hazards associated with a strong motion seismic
event at this site: ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground motion response.
Ground Rupture
The strongest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread, subcrustal events,
ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Surface faulting from these
deep events has not been documented to date. In our opinion, the risk of ground
rupture at this site during a strong motion seismic event is negligible.
ILiquef action
I
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of
time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of
grain -to -grain contact and a rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to
behave as a fluid. To have potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with
a grain size distribution of a specified range I (generally sand and silt); it must be loose;
it 'Must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude
and duration of groundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or
differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying'soils..
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
I
11
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 10
Due to the dense soil conditions and lack of a shallow groundwater table observed at
our test pit locations, in our opinion, the susceptibility to. liquefaction -induced
settlement at this site is negligible.
Ground Motion Response
The 1997 UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and ' a dynamic
force procedure for design -based shear calculations. Based on the soil conditions
encountered, it is our opinion soil profile type Sc, Very Dense Soil or Soft Rock as
defined in Table 1 6-J should be used to characterize the native site soils.
Excavations and Slopes
The following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no
circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming
responsibility for construction site safety or the Contractor's activities; such
responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred.
In no case should excav ' ation slopes be greater than the,limits specified in local, state,
and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from field
exploration and laboratory testing, the soils encountered on this site would be classifi * ed
as Type B by OSHA. Temporary cuts greater than four feet in height in Type B soils
should be sloped at an inclination of 1H:1V.. If slopes of this inclination, or flatter,
cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. Shoring will help protect
against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the
excavation. We can provide shoring recommendations, if needed.
Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes
should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as
anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to
improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface
drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of
slopes.
Permanently . exposed slopes should be seeded with an appr opriate species of
vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-10934
January 23, 2004 Page 11
Site Drainage
Groundwater seepage was not observed at the time of our exploration (December
2003). However, if seepage is encountered, ECI should be contacted to provide
recommendations for groundwater control.
The appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, should be established during
grading operations by ECI's representative, at which time the seepage areas, if present,
may be more clearly defined.
During construction, the site must be graded such that surface water is directed away
from the buildings. Water must not be allowed to stand in areas where buildings,
slabs, or pavements are to be const . ructed. Loose surfaces should be sealed by
compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils.
Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The
ground should be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet
away from the building, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of 2
percent.
Footing drains should be installed around building perimeters at, or just below, the
invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to initiate flow. A typical detail is
provided on Plate 4. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be
connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined
to an approved discharge.' Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow
for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems.
Utility Support and Backfill
The site soils should generally provide adequate support for utilities. Utility trench
backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility
alignments, particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility
line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand
tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be
carefully placed and hand tamped to about 12.inches above the crown of the pipe
before heavy compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench
backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12)
inches and compacted to the structural fill specifications detailed in this report, or
specifications required by the appropriate municipal codes.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
I
0
i
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY
Tom Braaten Construction E-1 0934
January 23, 2004 Page 12
LIMITATIONS
The recommendations and conclusions provided in this study are based on the site
materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the design
information provided by the client and our experience and engineering judgment. The
conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner
consistent with that level of care ' and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is
expressed or implied.
The recommendations submitted in this study are based upon the data obtained from
the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those
encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations
may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be
requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to. modify or verify
them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction.
IAdditional Services
I
I
I
I
ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and
specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been
properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction
specifications.
ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This
is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations
and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those
anticipated prior to the start of construction.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
I
I
F]
L]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1�
I
B�Owks*.
-BA Y''.
d
7
X FRE ERICK-
F 7
A-
I 9TH
SW
OVERL 4.,
ST
r
L
—185TH
/ART 3-
"e-/ Mv 1,
I -
Pt Sw
;
PK. "'t
18,7TH
ABU
Sw
. .5w:
ST w
aloD,
ST Sill
40, 3T
�L
188TH 8j—
ziZ'
189TH S SW 'A
.,
P�
t FL .1
;Z,190MIST
-$I Sw
SW
r
C*HERff
.'ST
—`13
-Li
ej.,
FwZT
W"
19
OR.
196
96M
IST
MELO'DY L I N 'UGET
ST Sw
I I �-
, 1. .'
00' - 860D
I
Ty"! V
BROOKIIEF4 Y LN
OR
EWLAND I L
�%
N ;'/t 6
INDERWA TE,
77--
":�" .1 ROOKME E
'ST
ERS I OIDT
ST. .�Zt
swl
PA
CK7�Ts
_.800, 7
IL ER L �LISTA.. I-
IN F, Pt
1.-&(
S1
my-00 N
ClhW. I" MIST
1 SIERRA'�Ij-
ST-
w 202RD' - A,
4-
01
1A, 6
BEACH J:
't m
L
ST SW aft 51 sw -
aqvjT
SvIA, e .. .
e
�4 T §
IVIC, I Im t
Sit
JS�RAGUE
YFIE D T
=v n sw
9;�
sr, Sw x PM
F zosTH
H1.
ql PX
El sl
N
N
THT
FST. SW
1
L
7
Sw
2i
I
DAY70N
ST
PL
2D9TH PL
PLE'�
Reference:
Snohomish County
Map 454
By Thomas Brothers Maps
Dated 2004
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color.
ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent
misinterpretation of the information resulting
from black & white reproductions of this plate.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geotechnical Engineering Geology Environmenlal Sciences
Construction Tesfing& IC130 / WABO inspection Ser%4ces
Vicinity Map
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Drwn- GLS
Date Jan. 20041
Proi. No. 10934
Checked SSR
Date 1/14104
1 Plate I
I
i
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOW
outflow to
Creek
'0111
40 Concrete
W�
A
Pipe 7,
TP-1"�
90
T
N
90
;00
Ido
TP-1-41 — Approximate Location of
ECI Test Pit, Proj. No.
E-10934, Dec. 2003
Subject Site
Proposed Building
Existing Building
L ----- I (To Be Removed)
NOTE: This plate may contain areas of color.
ECI cannot be responsible for any subsequent
misinterpretation of the information resulting
from black & white reproductions of this plate.
Approximate Scale
0 20 40 8011.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
GeoteCMCal Engineering. Geology Environmental Sciences
Construction Testing & 1CB0 / WABO Inspection Services
Test Pit Location Plan
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Drwn. GLS
Date Jan. 20041
Proi. No. 10934
Checked SSR
I Date 1 /15/04
1 Plate 2
Free Draining
Backfill
0, e�
1-18 inches min
Min 2" Dia.
000 0�
h
12 Inc els
Weep Hole
L) 0- 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0000 %loo cc 0
C
0 -.0
0 0
C
%o 00 010 0 0 0 0 0-ra.
Min. 6"
800%0 '
1." Drain
0 00 - 0000 CQ
0 Q0 0
0. CQ oc
Rock
,
rJ 00 0 00C)OO.0e
00 0
*,a '
Excavated Slope
0000 oc
%
0 0 --!'. -
0 0 %
a cool
o Q 0 %o 00
00 ocJ 0 a Jr.) 0 0 0
*0 0 o 00.('000 0 0
0 00004Z, 0000,0 0
0 0 Q0 0 90 -ooez
0 J Q - .
WEEP HOLE
DETAI
00 a C
0 " 0 000% :5
*O'b
C> o 0 0 -� 0
0 r)o 0 0 Q,
0
oca 0* 0 000 0 OQ
00 0 0 0
Perforated Pipe
000 000 0.. 0
0 Q 0 0
Wrapped with
1 foot min.
a 0 a
A*
Filter Fabric
I foot min. Compacted Subgrade
1) Free Draining backfill should consist of
granular soil having no more than 5
percent passing the #200 sieve and
no particles greater than 4 inches in
diameter. The percentage of particles
passing the #4 sieve should be between
25 and 75 percent
2) Structural backfill should be free of
organics, clayey soils, debris and other
deleterious materials. It should be
placed at or near the optimum moisture
content.
3) Where weep holes are utilized, surround
each weep hole with 3 cubic feet of 1 inch
drain rock. Maximum horizontal spacing
of weep holes should be 6 feet.
4) Drain pipe; perforated or slotted dgld
PVC pipe laid with perforations or slots
facing down; fight jointed; with a positive
gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated
plastic pipe. Drain line should be bedded
on and surround with free draining 1 inch
drain rock. The drain rock may be
encapsulated with a geotechnical drainage
fabric at the engineers discretion.
LEGEND
Surface Seal; Native Soil or other Low
Permeability Material
00004:� Free Draining Backfill
e 0 0 .1
Structural Fill compacted to 90 percent
relative compaction
1 inch Drain Rock
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geolechnical Engbmrs, GeologL-As & Environmental SdenftAs
1 0 Construction Tesfing & 1CB0 / WABO Mspection Servilms
RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND BACKFILL
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Drwn. GLS
DateJan.2004
JPrqJ.No. 10934
Chocked SSR
I Date 1/15104
Plate :3
Slope To Drain
6 inch min.
U o- 0c,
0 0 -- 0 a 00 - 0 0 00 V- tj
0 0 0 0 a 0 00 0 0,�Jo 00 0 0 00 a 0 0
0 0 1� o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Z) 0
W60 0 a 0 0 0 rJ 0c60 0 0 0 1 0 000
0 a Z 0 C) . fV 0 - Z, 0 0 04po
0 0 00 000 0 cc> 0000.000 40 c
0 00.0 %0. —
0 1Z) 00 0 0 0 000�j 000 0 0
0 0 0 0 . 0
o a 4Z�00004zl o - el 0 0,
0 0 00 0 C
.. a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
0 0 00 0 0 a 0 00 0 0 00
00 oo 000 ori 00 0 000 0 0CJ
0 0 0 0 lj�j 0 0 0 C)
0 Do Go 0 0000 a Cz 00 0 00000
4 inch min. 0000 0 0000 0 000 0 0
0 *0.- 0. 0 a 10 0 00 0 0 0 -,Z, oc
Diameter oc,.C�fo%o 000 a 040CP
,�D 0 0 C) 0 J
00 0 0 a
Perforated Pipe 0.0. .00 .0 0 000 C>
Wrapped in Drainage 4� 0.0- o 00
0 0 0 0 .
0 0,0 %ZJ 0
Fabric 0 a %00 0
o o t,
0-
'k-0 0
2 inch min. / 4 inch max.
Surface seal; native soil or other
low permeability material.
0 0 0 .
C�o 000
0 0 0 1" Drain Rock
. -Oc�
Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid
0 PVC pipe laid with perforations or
slots facing down; tight jointed; with a
positive gradient Do not use flexible
corrugated plastic pipe. Do not be
building downspout drains into footing
lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric
or equivalent
12 inch
min.
inch
nin.
2 inch min'.
SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE
NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING
Earth Consultants, Inc.
Geolechnical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists
Construction Testing & lCB0 / WABO irtspection Setvices
TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL
18916 Sound View Place
I Edmonds, Washington I
Drwn. GLS
Date Jan. 2004
Proj. No. 10934
Checked SSR
Date 1/15/04
1 plate 4
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION
E-10934
Our field exploration was performed on December 12, 2003. Subsurface conditions at
the site were explored by excavating three test pits to a maximum depth of nine feet
below grade. The test pits were excavated by Northwest Excavating and Trucking,
Inc. using a backhoe.
Approximate test pit locations and elevations were determined by pacing from the
existing lot boundaries and referencing plans provided by the client. The locations and
elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by
the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location
Plan, Plate 2.
The fi'eld exploration was continuously monitored by, a geologist from ECI, who
classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained
representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site
features. The samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil
Classification System, which is presented on Plate Al, Legend. Representative soil
samples were placed in closed containers and returned to the laboratory for further
examination and testing.
Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates A2 through A4. The final logs represent
the interpretations of the field logs and the results of laboratory examination and
testing. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries
between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual.
Earth Consultants, Inc.
MAJOR DIVISIONS
GRAPH
SYMBOL
LETTER
SYMBOL
TYPICAL DESCRIPTION
GW
weii-Graded Gravels. Gravei-sand
Gravel
And
Clean Gravels
�OAOAon
9W
mixtures, Little Or No Fines
41111111111,
GP
Poorly- Graded Gravels, Gravel -
Gravelly
(little or no fines)
Coarse
Grained
Soils
Soils
More Than
9P
Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines
GM
Silty Gravels, Gravel - Sand -
50% Coarse
Gravels With
g M
Silt Mixtures
Fraction
Retained On
No. 4 Sieve
Fines( appreciable
amount of fines
GC
gC
Clayey Gravels, Gravel - Sand -
Clay Mixtures
More Than
50% Material
Sand
And
Sandy
Soils
Clean Sand
(little or no fines)
SW _--,
SW
Well -Graded Sands, Gravblly
Send., Little Or No Fines
SP SP
Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly
Sands. Little Or No Fines
Sands With
Fines (appreciable
amount of fines)
SM
Sm
Silty Sands. Sand - Silt Mixtures
Larger Than
No. 200 Sieve
Size
More Than
50% Coarse
Fraction
Passing No. 4
Sieve
5_�SC
Clayey Sands, Sand -Clay Mixtures
Inorganic Silts& Very Fine Sands, Rock FJour,Silty-
Clayey Fine Sands; Clayey Silts w/ Slight Plasticity
Fine
Grained
Soils
Silts Liquid Limit
And Less Than 50
Clays
Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium ' Plasticity,
Gravelly CI . ays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean
�01
Organic Silts And Organic
Silty Clays Of Low. Plasticity
More Than
MH -,-'
mn
Inorganic Silts, Micaceous O.r Diatomaceous Fins,
sand Or Silty Soils
50% Material
Smaller Ttan
No. 200 Sieve
Silts Liquid Limit
And Greater Than 5
Clays
Ch
InorrgaNc Clays Of High
Plastici.tY, Fat Clays.
OH Oh
organic Clays Of Medium ib-High
Plasticity, Organic Silts
Size
ILI 11 %11/ .21-11
PT.
Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils
Highly Organic Soils
L �L,, J,*'.
Pt
With High Organic Contents
Topsoil
-41 14, 4 41 41
Humus And Duff Laye r
Fill
Hijjhly Variable Constituents
The discussion in the text of this report Is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature
of the material presented In the attached logs.
DUAL SYMBOLS are used to Indicate borderline soil classification.
C
TORVANE READING, tsf
2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER
qu
PENETROMETER READING, tsf
W
MOISTURE, % dry weight
24* i.b. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
P
SAMPLER PUSHED
SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED
WATER OBSERVATION WELL
pcf
DRY DENSITY, lbs. per cubic ft.
LL
LIQUID LIMIT, %
sz DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER
PI
PLASTIC INDEX
DURING EXCAVATION
Earth Consultants Inc.
(k"(X11t1iCW Olghv,'Mi. GM*4f1SLS & 111%4rM.1V-1Wd SOUIIISLS
7 SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/ DATE
LEGEND
Proj. No. 10934 1 Date Jan. 2004 1 P18to Al
Test Pit Log a db
I
I
I
Ll
I
I
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Projed Name:
18916 Sound View Place
Sheet Of
I 1 1 -
Job No.
10934
Logged by:
SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test Pit No.:
TP-1
Excavation Contactor:
NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation.:
95'
Notes:
General
Notes
W
cL E
cL E
0 IL M
19 E
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": grass
9.2
Tf
TV
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SM
Brown silty SAND with. gravel, medium dense, moist
-dense
-o)dde staining
-very dense
-contains cobbles
-gray
Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below e)dsbng grade. No groundwater
encountered during e)cavation.
Eanh Consultants Inc.
Cwxxrdm1cWFngftwrjr.Q�f*�,.N& F:nv1rmn,.-wa1Sdmt6m
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Proj. No. 10934
Dwn. GLS
'Date Jan. 2004
Checked SSR
Date 1/15/04
Plate A2
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and
juc!CerLl�ey are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
.nf '0 _#_q � W. I—
Test Pit Log a . 96
i
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
Project Name:
18916 Sound View Place
Sheet of
1 1 1
Job No.
10934
ogged by:
F SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test PH No.:
TP-2
Excavation Contactor:
NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation:
95,
Notes:
General
Notes
W
cL E
T >�
0 U)
CL
LL E
M
W
E
(n 5,
0 in
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 6": grass
12.5
8 .4
1:111-111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SM
Brown silty fine to medium SAND, medium dense, moist (Possible Fill)
SM
Grayish brown silty SAND with gravel, dense, moist
-29.2% fines
Test pit terminated at 8.0 feet below existing grade. No groundwater
encountered during excavation.
Earth Consultants Inc.
Q%v�".inlaa I Postw.m. GK*vw�& Fmirm I i"ra I -xientism
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Proj. No. 109;;
Dn. GLS
Date Jan. 2004
Checked SSR -TDate
1/15/04
Plate A3
Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole, modified by engineering tests, analysis and
1 meLt
ug� '��ey are not necessarily representative of . other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
.ft M —f-4 — fhi. I—
I
Test Pit Log
i
I
P
I
I
I
L��
I
I
1J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Name:
18916 Sound View Place
Sheet Of
Job No.
10934
FL�� by-..
1 SSR
Date:
12/12/03
Test Pit No.:
TP-3
Excavation Contactor:
NW Excavating
Ground Surface Elevation:
95'
Notes:
General
Notes
W
M
-6
-
E
-EL 0-
Li-E
Cn —
0 .8
E
Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil & Sod 4": grass
15.9
38.2
8.2
AT:
H:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SM
Brown si4 fine SAND, medium dense, moist
-trace organics, roots
-26.8% fines
-dense
-oxide staining
-co ntains cobbles
Test pit terminated at 9.0 feet below existing grade. No gro undwater
encountered during excavation.
Earth Consultants Inc.
Q%Xed1n1CW Mpx"F. &
Test Pit Log
18916 Sound View Place
Edmonds, Washington
Prej. No. 10934 1
Dwn. GLS
Date Jan.2004
Checked SSR I
Date 1/15/04
Plate A4
Subsurface conclitions aepictecl represent our ooservations at tne time ana iocation or inis expioratory noie, moaffma oy engineering tems, anaipis ana
1��Tt. 11" are not necessarily representative of other times and locations. We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of
. # _ — thic le -
I
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
E-10934
Earth Consultants, Inc.
rticle Size DistributiolWeport
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
GRAIN SIZE - mm
% COBBLES
% GRAVEL
% SAND
% SILT
I % CLAY
USCS
AASHTO
PL
LL
38.6
32.2
29.2
SM
4.1
26.8
SM
SIEVE
PERCENT FINER
inches
size
0
0
1.5
100.0
100.0
3/4
72.7
100.0
3/8
68.3
98.1
�RAIN SIZE'
D60
3.91
0.264
D30
0.0813
0.0993
D10
COEFFICIENTS
cc
Cu
0 Source:
o Source:
SIEVE
number
size
PERCENT FINER
0
0
#4
61.4
95.9
#8
58.0
94.4
#16
54.6
92.4
#30
50.7
86.8
#50
44.4
65.4
#100
36.4
38.3
#200
29.2
26.8
Sample No.: TP-2
Sample No.: Tp-3
Client: Tom Braaten Construction
EARTH Project: 18916 Soundview
CONSULTANTS, INC. Proied No.: E-10943
0 TP-2: 8'- SM
Brown silty Sand w/ gravel; 8.4% moisture
0 TP-3: 2'- SM
Brown silty Sand, 15.9% moisture
REMARKS:
0 tech: Jonathan Reeve
0 tech: Jonathan Reeve
Elev./Depth: 8'
Elev. /Depth: 2'
DISTRIBUTION
E-10934
4 Copies Tom Braaten Construction
3443 Evergreen Point Road
Medina, Washington 98039
Attention: Mr. Tom Braaten
Earth Consultants, Inc.
I
E
0
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposah Construction of New Single -Family Residence (See Attached Site Plan)
Proponent: Tom Braaten Construction
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 1896 Soundview Place
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection, and
mitigation measures have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive
plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as
provided by RCW 43.21 C.240 and WAC 197-11-158
An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made
afte ' r review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by December 26, 2003.
Responsible Official: Robert Chave
Position/Title: Manager - Planning Division
Phone: 425-771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue'North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: 1 0 --:S Signature:
xx You may appeal this, determination to Robert Chave; Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than December 26, 2003, by submitting a written
appeal with the required appeal fee and citing the reasons for the appeal.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
xx Posted on — December 9. 2003, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community
Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
xx Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the
Checklist.
'1�
Page I of 2
VOETMANN SEPA DETERMINATIONDOC
IV9/03.SEPA
Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist:
XX Burlington Northern Railroad
XX Environmental Review Section 2900 Bond
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX AT&T Broadband
Ouside P�nt Engineer, North Region
2081184 Ave. S., Suite 101
Kent, WA 98032
XX Department of Fish & Wildlife
16018 Mill Creek Boulevard
Mill Creek, WA 98012
Attachments
pc: File No. PC-03-481
SEPA Notebook
Everett, WA 98201
XX Applicant: Tom Braaten,
Tom Braaten Construction Inc.
3443 Evergreen Pt. Rd.
Medina, WA 98039
Page 2 of 2
VOETMANN SEPA DETERMINATIONDOC
12/9/03.SEPA
CA..
(P C TY OF EDMON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST.
,6�s't. l%9Q1
Purpose of Checkfist.-
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.2 1 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental'
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment ne purpose of this checklist is toprovide information to help
you and the, agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EISis required.
instrucdonsfor AppUcants-
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. - Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental.impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefidly, to t he best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or. if
a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan'to do them over a . period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
NOTE: Projects generating new traffic will be required to submit a Traffic Study prepared by a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
Specific requirements for the Traffic Study may vary depending upon the project, and will be provided by the City Engineer upon
request. Please contact the Engineering Division at. 425-771-3202 for specific study requirements. City review of the Traffic Study
may require assessment of the "Development Project Peer Review" fee of $45 plus the cost of the review.
Use of checWgfor nonprojectproposals.
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete
the SUPPLEWNTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and. "property or site" should be read as
proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1 Name of proposed project, if applicable: 14 o u s 6� --ro *? r- To I 1,-r A-E:
1991(o -.90UA)*b vlaNd PL- 5bA 6 AJ Yj 5'
2. Name of applicant: AA P,.AA-rFJ 60 AJ �7r V e-TTWJ . I
3. Address and phone number of applicant. and contact persom
63
Page I of 24
sepa checkfin - pubfic.doc:4.182WI
17 — 1!� ZO C) 7
4. Date checklist prepared:
5. Agency requesting checklist: City ofEdmonds
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applica�bie): -51'A R-r 60 Aj -S TV -j e-T-( cAJ
zoo+
(STAFF COMMENTS)
p
7. Do you..have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to.or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
(STAFF COMNENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or win be prepared, directly related
to'this proposal.
r.' e4
-A )=)o
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
0
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 2 of 24
a" checkW - public.doc:4.19.2001
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
(STAFF
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
'gi
r—AAiO tf-541WC-E- Affov..
6 0
-r;+ r,- Pt�o OFU-T'�- A--r
169 1(,n --,-a ti xJ 'b- V I r--vj ft- , -r14 r- YR- 0 fALrY
(STAFF COMMENTS) A—,-t+n-L r )n a rA
12. Location of the. proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, If known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related.
to this checklist. 181 IG 'So V . Ai)�, 4 . lfvJ -iI-Ac-f—:7
Eh M d A SI W-A
217osisoa+jz600
5EL 13 �Tw 7- 7 �J kq& 3 E WA
L 61'� � b - + I I o r- —ror- LabsAy -
(STAFTCOMNMNTS) A±t3o C. 'Q
C
Page 3 of 24
sepa chockfist - pubficADcA.18.2WI
t
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
lopes ountainous other:
a. General description of the site (circle��olling,hil<ii`(;W �s
-AE9 &A. 7-bfo 5 L- 0 A-f 1?VlUt1NL EA"b
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
67 A4
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, c lay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know
. the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
�56-A)bY ZAAAA &ix wiT(4 0,�,4
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 4 of 24
sqm cbeckKu - pubfic.dac.4.18.2001
"l
LJ
e. Describe the purpose, type mind approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.. Indicate source
of fin.
WS WILL 136 6AAbl" A f XUX- Irb YAgDs -ro
i v srA-LL- -r (+ Eo ujvbA-i-,o,--j A-,o 1-,+ e -r> I r-T w tu,
PI-AmPl eii 15Y,-n5;t4cj&- oi= F;:,yjbA-1ukJ WR NJ 6c)'M PUFFF-
(STAFF COMMENTS)
L Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
a
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:.
! M 4. —1,4 L-L S I "((. " A 1('T 'F=5AJe' a -'-
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial
wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and,give
approximate quantities if known.
OV &L N-47 -AA)b T?A& KOO r- J:Z& A- F:-'5-w
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 5 of 24
sepa checklist - pubfic.doc:4.19.20DI
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
(STAFFCOMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
2. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
mpu— 5T9 v;A sk wi n4 A +0
1?0 1 IAU 5r *1 -9 ACk— 14-VIE Ei OWS 1'4JT0
Pu &c,-r 4
(2)
Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
4150- LrO PL-AA]
(STAFF COMMENTS) P?:2,01 LX>J,--6 �J -ZCd t4
(3) Estimate the amount of flil and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
(STAFF COMMENT
Page 6 of 24
scpa checklist - Vjbhc.dDcA19.2Wl
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
tj o
(STAFF COMMEN
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
(STAFF COMME
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe -the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
(STAFF COMMENT
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
(STAFF COMMIE
Page 7 of 24
sep checkHst . pubkdDc:4.18.2001
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.-; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be
served (if applicable), or the number of anima s or humans the system(s) are expecteO to serve.
(STAFF COMMENT
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
I A14 (p 9— riJIJ 7FFAII
e.
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
41A
(STAFF COMMENT
Page 8 of 24
sepa chockW - pubfir-doc:4.18.2001
4. Plants
Check or circle.types of vegetation found on the site:,,
deciduous, tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfbil, other:
other types of vegetation:
(STAFF COMMENT
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
yv 1;4& t-rgfi-)
vo U5 f�y�
(STAFF COMMENT
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
1A
(STAFF COMME
Page 9 of 24
wpa d=kfist - pub5c.doc:4.18.2001
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
lqbba3� L Am% <c-A ?wt. Rfwf,,�) jit"i doy 54
(STAFF COMMENTS) IAn Ak a a &
5. 'Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbird U
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species own to be on or near the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
(STAFF COMME,E
Page 10 of 24
wp dm*Jist - pubkAwA.18.20DI
4
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS) -
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, woo d stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
I
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
b
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plansof this proposal? List ot her proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page I I of 24
wpa dwcUist - pubfic.dx:4.18.2001
a
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals., risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
4
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
o/,a
(STAFF COMMENTS
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
(STAFF COMMENTS
wp checkhst - public.dw:4.18.2001
Page 12 of 24
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)?. Indicate what hours noise
would come from the site.
Y&A�— Mz) t � V— tit—. U LTS F4.0 I^
c4t'i
augL5 :2206 -00
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENT
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. - What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
(STAFF
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 13 of 24
wpa dm:ckW - pubficdoc:4.18.2001
C. Describe any structures on the site.
'0 t��
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
�4o u
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
E What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS) 0� - � 9 — I ' 0--% 0 1-04-
a . �.d @' C
1. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS)'f-'*'.,j0L,-.A6�&,
Page 14 of 24
sepa dwdfin - pub6c.doc:4.19.2001
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
*L-f t— LAJ T144- <Itr Jq,4
(STAFT COMMENTSLigo rl,; *..=2 &I CA Az 021Q-4ak I A-
L Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
(STAFF COMMEN
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
L Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
I n U I L. N t Ak. ?1FJ4q I I
(STAFF COMMENTS) —
Page IS of 24
wpa dwckfist - pubfic.doc:4.18.2001
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
(STAFF COMMENT
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
PN r, Kqj —�
(STAFF COMMENTS) QS' 1,-A , d- -
Page 16 of 24
sepa checkral - pubfic.doc:4.18.20DI
a
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. . What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
(STAFF COMMIENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Pap 17 of 24
wpa checkW - pAblic.doc:4.18.20DI
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
M/A
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
�Jn
(STAFF COMMENTS
-c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS
Page 18 of 24
wp checkUst - pubficAoc.4.18.20DI
0 . 4
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
2. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to.the site? If so, generally escribe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,'scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
U hL')z
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklbt - pAlk—doc:4.18.2001
V
9 1 ��. 0
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
r�b f R I,%- AIL��
(STAFF COMMENT
C. How many parldng spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
k gk-X-7- JA— I A-int,
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Pap 20 of 24
sWed 'list - publicdoc.4.18.2WI
L How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
�J
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
8. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 21 of 24
sepa checkHA - pubfic.dw.4.19.20DI
U
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
septic system, other:
CABLIL -7
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers aretrue and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
make its decision.
4? /0 .3
Signature of Proponent
Date Submitted
Page 22 of 24
sepa cheddist - p1bbeAft-A.18-2001
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheetforproject actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpfid to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements, of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,
would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
N1b I AX E VAs
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect.plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
tJ,12-
r
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natpral resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy,and natural resources are:
Page 23 of 24
seps checklisi - puWic.doc:4. 19.2001
A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
I.J
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
N
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environmenL
Cojuru
Page 24 of 24
scpa dodd& - public.d=4.18.2001
0
0
Ism SM Sw
1 2
en,
lam
Ism
151MO
Ion
Ism
15717 10719
Iff"s Ism lam I Bra $I
18814 1
1=2 Ism
low Ism
Lis
lam I
IM9
Isola Ism
w24 IN
law I BwM 5- low Ism 188110 IM2
ia= isqu laws 2
Q.-
18831 am Issas inu
imom iagos
IM2 10910 iSON
ISOM 18831 Was
1010 isqu
Isms 19911
1014
IM4
lam 118W
lam 9313
ima 1=4
19012 lam — - — 901
9036
WATES
940
Isms 9615
19018 9322 am 0210
19017 9M" 97
I
9021 i9ma 1910?
sell 19018
am
Ism
M9 9715 9609 is=
Ism
m2l 19102
19105 19102
Was
19105
14111 19117 19121 RM 19124
IND Isla 19120 1011;
19130 19128 1 19120
19129 19125 Vles
1596 1523 1551 1542 19210
Ism 1922=2 19213 Oils
19212 19214 lam
Ism IM
Iwo 5V 19211 Isms
Ism 19218 19222 9210
C3 . I
Iwo cc, IV=
1840 Ism Ism Ism
1439
1530 Ism
Ism 1020
19316 `7� Ism 10111
1520 1516 19314
low
Was,
9515'
1022 lam . I I
;� I, I
laid 1� — .?,,
14M
1030 1512
1422 1428
1450 9195
1p 1038
4M 1441 1420 1430
142? 140 1010 101 1019 1023 1430
1031 1440 1418 1109
1421 1420 1020 19516
14RWW
1043 1420 1417
1410 1030
1402 306 1412 19516
I W4 1047
1304 19515 19511
SundsWw CP 1 1403 1410 N '4 Iowa
414 1 1405 t, = —
db 1011
1055 407
1409
1400
010 912
1324
014
7s7l.
1312 1313
Ole
Edmonds
1303
p
entary
1304
Ism
1306 I3W
tp- To
Pro i (94T 4aAL, el.7.
ZF_ -1 0
*OIL
�WKIHUH AW>WSP P&ldWr 119.-1
fmpmsw How -AT
,Z,4f # x OwTio
INV/
SED
EK
L
4'11'44TLo4& Aw
A99 PMVGJ-� qFAW.Ms. F FSIJCf,
mos
T ft
APY
xx
X ISOUND VIEW f-LA,-9
Cq EDMONDS
SNOHOMISW COUNTY ar
SCALE 1:20
flreFLVICM A9916 4U406.
m5fo"WA +bfz
Z7 "FY
F66CE ?lw:,4 ofio. FY z OR-v*"Y 14--i-s " F,-r.
FAIPO "PT
urfbqz FLOM S40-4,
TcrrAL c
407 , 6T
PEI
4—t
go'x-zol -r6Kfoft 11 T At.
r1op LOrr AmkA zs&o.,
t&L ol vo
RECEIVED
3 2003
I'V"V Co-""Py PERMIT COUNTER
111W
"? C. 18 0)
May 9, 2003
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: , wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Planning - Building - Engineering
Cedric Lindsay
744 Point * Whitney Rd
Brinnon, WA 98320
RE: Amend existing storm drainage easement recording 2242415 at 1.8916 Soundview PL)
Dear Mr. Lindsay:
We have reviewed your request, dated 4/11/03, to vacate a portion of the storm drainage easement
(recording number 2242415) which. crosses the property at 18916 Soundview Place. Since the City
doeshot have nor maintain any storm drainage system south of the stream, we do not see any
reason why that portion of the storm easement from the top of the bank south of the stream to the
terminus of the easement could not be eliminated. You will need to have your surveyor prepare an
amendment to the original storm easement and a signature block for the City to sign. This paper
work can be submitted with the building permit for the garage unless you want this resolved now.
Relocation.of the storm line as outlined in your letter will be a private storm line and cannot be located
in the sanitary sewer easement that runs along the west property line. A Hydraulic's Permit
Application (HPA) must be obtained from the Department of Fisheries before any storm line can run
to the creek.
If you have any questions please call me at 425-771-0220.
Sincerely,
4,� Z4�4��
Lyle Chrisman
Engineering Program Manager
Cc: Bill Semon, Edmonds Windemere
VAetters\lindsay-storm easement.doe
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, J6pan
GARY HAAKENSON
CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 771-0220 FAX (425) 771-0221
Website: wwwci.edmondsma.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
C. Planning -- Building - Engineering
January 11, 2002
Donald A Jangard -
1109 Excelsior Place
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Address Correction
This letter is to inform you of an address correction. Your building application list
18916 Sound View Place as the site address. The correct address for Lot D,
Lindsay -Groves Subdivision is ' 18914 Sound View Place. I will inform all City
Divisions including Fire, Police, Utility Billing, Public Works and Building.
It is your responsibility to inform the Post Office and all other interested parties of
this correction. We apologize for the inconvenience this may cause you and
greatly appreciate your cooperation.
Thank you,
de A�om nt erWvice9se/
Cc: Fire Department
Police Department
Utility Billing
Public Works
Building Official/Street File
Incorporated August 11, 1890
Sister City - Hekinan, Japan
3THru ADDRESS FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
7110-210TH ST.S.W. - EDMONDS, WA 98026 - (206) 771-0235 - FAX (206) 744-6057
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PUBLI6 WORKS DIVISION
lc"s t . I S 9 \-)
January 24, J 996
Cedric E. Lindsay
744 Pt. Whitney Road
Brinnon, WA 98320
SUBJECT: Leak Credit for Suzanne Lindsay at 18916 Sound View Place
Account#232050
Dear Mr. Lindsay:
I have reviewed your account and will allow a credit from October 4, 1995 through
February 1996 in accordance with our City policy. The. policy states that the customer will,
be billed at the retail rate based upon the average water consumption for the same period
during the previous year. In addition, the excess water lost from the leak will be billed to
customer at the City's wholesale rate with a 15% surcharge added for administrative cost.
Only one. leak credit will be granted in any three year period.
Should you have any additional questions after you receive your new billing, please
contact Ilene Larson, Utility Billing Clerk, at 771-0241.
Sincerely,
Ron Holland
Water/Sewer Supervisor
RH/lk
I
cc: Ilene Larson
Utility Billing Clerk
Suzanne Lindsay
#232050
%vordata\watcr\credit96\#232050,
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Mr. Don Hall, Supervisor
City of Edmonds Combined
501 Bell Street
P.O. Box 2008
Edmonds, WA. 98020-2008
Dear Mr. Hall:
40'
Olk -2--
R10 EE IV I
�&� ���� � �
,.`.~ .~~_
�N������D�n
` �=~~~ ^^~'^-~��r«
Utility
Brinnon,WA
January 13, 1996
I visited your office Jan. 9, 1996 and spoke
Customer Service counter about the utility bill for my sister,
Suzanne Lindsay, at 18916 Sound View Pl. Edmonds. (Acc.# 2-32050)
I asked the lady how we should deal with the balance of her bill
which orginally totaled $499.03 for the period Oct. 9 to Dec. 11.
She suggested that I write you a letter about the circumstances
of excess water use during the last quarter of 1995.
My sister had been told that there was a leak somewhere in her
water service line. On Oct. 25 I inspected the length of the
service line and pipes within the house but found no surface
evidense of a leak, but the meter showed that water was running
somewhere.
On Oct. 27 I came over from Brinnon where we live and dug up the
pipe where it entered the basement and also where it passes by a
large maple tree in the yard. At both locations I found moderate
leaks which I repaired temporarily, and apparently stopped the
leaks. However, since the 3/4 in. galvanized pipe had been in
place since 1939 when the house was built it seemed necessary to
bypass as much of the old line as practical. It also turned out
that between Oct. 28 and Nov. 8 a larger leak broke out in the
yard beyond the place where I had made temporary repairs.
Therefore, Nov. 8» 9, and 10 I proceeded, with the help of our son
to dig a new ditch from house to maple tree and drill a hole
through the basement wall. We then disconnected both ends of the
old pipe and and the yard line west of the house and installed
about 60 feet of 3/4 in. Schedule 40 PVC pipe and fittings. That
work was completed on Nov. 10 at which time the meter showed no
evidence of leaks.
It is my intention to replace about 110 ft. of pipe between the
maple tree and meter later in the spring.
The lady at the Service counter said I would need to supply
information on the cost of the repair. I purchased
pipe and fittings from Yelwick Hardware in Brinnon,
Clallam County Coop in Sequim; Crow Hardware in
Edmonds; and Ernst in Lynnwood. I have so far only
located slips from Ernst and Callalam Coop. I have
~
gotten unit prices from Yelwick. The list of materials
used is enclosed and if you should require more sales
slips, I can continue to search.
It was not clear from the lady at the Service counter what kind of
adjustment might be made to Suzanne's bill but hope there could
at least be a reduction in the sewer portion of the charge.
yours sincerely,
Cedric E. Lindsay �
744
Brinnon, WA 98320
(360) 796 4276
2
1�wzevyal e, do if e o;a �s
A0.1,7
I fee .,zor
YW, -cleecres '4�6
C&tl �V& eem".1- 2-97
gao At
�lp
All 414fk* Xe
41t
A
A
q
AV
S _C
TP�,F`-T FILE
CITY CLERK
CIVIC CENTER
EDMONDS. WA 08020
CONSTRUCTION LICENSE
In consideration of the construction by the City of Edmonds, an
optional code, municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and the
Snohomish County Public Works Department, of certain improvements to an
unnamed creek, hereby grant to the City of Edmonds and the Snohomish
V-4 County Public Works Department a license to enter as may be. necessary
CD to construct, repair and maintai-n the aforementioned improvemnts, said
license to be on or over the following described property:
Parcel A
That portion of Government Lot 3 in Section 13, Township 27 North,
cc Range 3 Fast of W.M., described as follows:
Ccnvmncing at the Northeast corner of said Govermient Lot and
running thence South 88033'00" West along the North line of said
Lot 882.99 feet to an intersection with the Southeasterly line of
Great Northern Railway right-of-way; thence South 37 0 17'00".West
along said right-of-way line 17.10 feet to the point of beginning
of this description; thence continuing South 37�17'00" West
61;.25 feet; thence South 52043'00" East 48.62 feet; thence North
88 33100" East 210.34 feet; tlience South 52043'00" East 87.27 feet
to the Northwesterly margin of Sound View Place as shown on
unrecorded Plat of Fruitdale on the.Sound; thence North 37'17100"
EaSt along said margin a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South
16 01'00" West 27.57 feet to an intersection with a line 10.00
feet Southeasterly (measured at right angles) and parallel to
sa� �orthwesterly margin of Sound View Place; thence North
37 7 00" East along said parallel line 435.53 feet; thence
North 5243'00" West 309.97 feet to the point of beginning and
containing 3.83 acres, more or less.
This construction license shall be, and is, irrevocable for a
period equal and ccnmnsurate to the initial construction of said
improveinents and shall expire upon completion of the public
improvements by the Snohomish County Stream 'ream. Upon that date, this
license shall be, and is, at an end.
DATED this D day of 19
Euq0nia. Suzann Lindsay
STATE OF VaSHINGTON)
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
On this day personally appeared before me
to nle kndwn to
individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing
.instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same
as A free wid voluntary act and deed, for the
uses'�and purposes therein mentioned.
0 t'�NDER MY EAND AND OFFICIAL SEAT, THIS DAY OF
LIJ
19
C)
C)
LAj N Y PUBLIC in and for the State of -
Washington, residing at
P
VOL "IMPAwn'l
61
STREET FILE
I, Mrs. Lindsey, give my permission to Dave Peterson for the
installation and maintenance of a fish ladder on:
Parcel A
That portion of Government Lot 3 in Section 13, Township 27
North, Range 3 East of W.M., described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot and
running thence South 88 0 33'00" West along the North line of said
Lot 882.99 feet to an intersection with the Southeasterly line of
Great Northern Railway right-of-way; thence South 37017'00" West
along said right-of-way line 17.10 feet to the goint of beginning
of this description; thence continuing South 37 17'00" West 611.25
feet; thence South 52043'00".East 48.62 feet; thence North 880
33'00" East 210.34 feet; thence South 52043'00" East 87.27 feet to
the Northwesterly margin of Sound View Place as shown on
unrecorded Plat of Fruitdale on the Sound; thence North 37'17'00"
East along said margin a distance of 80.00 feet; thence South 160
01'00" West 27.57 feet to an intersection with a line 10.00 feet
Southeasterly (measured at right angles) and parallel to said
Northwesterly margin of Sound View Place; thence North 37017'00"
East along said parallel line 435.53 feet; thence North 52043'00"
West 309.97 feet to the point of beginning and containing 3.83
acres, more or less.
I hereby promise to provide written notification to the City in
the event this permission is revoked.
FISHLAD/TXTST530
10008
10/30/01 TUE 11:03 FAX 253 471 5571 FATCO
A -MEY
KSIRVR
5 D
JAN 2 3 2004
MOM TGF
�,PERMIT COUW
NO SALZS -rAX
Ln �K
I at it REQUIRED
0 T I C E 0 F E A E 04 1-
WAY 12 19'r,
Amv_
'70 ALL *04 TW-SE Msam arm"
WrICE IS Na-zw sim, Iii CMWC E..L-MXAY, led *on, and
sin
'110 11 ;p n
1:111f S -."#
.91 Rla�
Owe"
G
Scic�lshr, St*%
'of
%
P4 Of
owl I
xmId,S;;i1
an * 130".'. 1 oter-
Ivet. from'"*,"
corner
said Governewt.;t0t.,3e, i' _'_ -
SW �. -iseld
att a Vey
,this Ama a I
pt ms "hwo6e..
flea
AM714PE, .74.42
tests ""Ame' S
.40; #MK=, S.-A WWW!4.�A IS.%
f
11� WU-0 OW"
foot
southeikfaelif corner Is-AddITjciiQP:j=*rdjjq to
lbo plat lbeirmot n=*rdj&jae'.. to' �4ii I. rvc*rft
of Snabalzb ccioty, -ftsil
I lineof atiltaf- -W6-61 a
M1034 so d I line,. -4649atto"m Orly
of sald Lot 4' 5 � 15.00 faiet;
144.42 foot to the Trto -Pobof 1641 ft-1 kv W007,3"".
do hereby girprit,'Con"Y' Urdu 01! presmat �mw futurm cW.WS,
lbeIr b6irs, ez�jgft A of #Al I Or Pcrticft Of fbO above dc=rlbW
Proporty, rind unt; Pubf Ic vtj I Ity v1stelct No. I of Snoh=Ijib Cowvty, &w uq,,
Coraral Telopirpeno Comparry of tm Northwest, Inc.., MW Aint* Washl6gTon ALetural C-as
Comparry, and unto TU City of Edmondit, a muftIcjpzj c*rporation. an caseon, for
Frig -ass and egrmss ar4 for 'rLm
1 rMto 1 I -at I Oh dPam t I on- we I ntaftence ON rep& I Of
UT I I as OC4 rocas"ry appurtan"c8s OvO:- umd4w. b=09 9. through and upor Tho
fQl1cv1t'9 d0scrTb*d Prx>Perfy, $11tuated In tbo Cou" of Snoticotsh, State of
WaShln3tz>n. to Wtt:
Tbd't Px-t[On Of Section 13. T27N, P3E, W.M., �,%crjbed vs folFows:
Co=ene-lmg !§+ +t10 intQrSe;�tion of tho 6astpr.., right of ww I ine
of Tte Burl ingron Norl horn. FtaT [way .(rTghT-ot_v?_y.60 feet', v I Th TSO
north I In* of Gover-ro"rot Lot 3 In atvw &AId se�=tloft 13, %&ld
!nter�ectir,ri beinq aq�.A4 feet frDff -!�,* mr1ha'asT
WT',-,8r Ot said Goverraenr L�rr 3. TN&rc& 5 370171��DW. alo"t-, said
-,.,;th_cStar!-f c:or-
eas-Torly r--gh-;�-of-*by line, 6Z6.99 feet to the
.mr of that c*-Tarm tmet of larr-d descrlh*d in ac-%d fI (ad for
recon, vr�dar Aud;+crls File No. 1330594, recmrdS .ttf Sr%ohomlrh
dr a cisr rce of 48.62 feet;
Cc. !;5fbnce of 92,9� iqerr to
7 1 i_'r_h�Ttujo Flo �z,
is a e-cr'Tptizrn; 'r%0!-z:e -nce _)f
O�'. T; Inc. 1�e z
I
�'4 4 2" 15 n4
10/30/01 TUE 11:04 FAX 253 471 5571 FA:1:(;U W-j v v v
f' Id
Sa Curve. bolng a Curve to the right
and corammins: :niVIG of W02,0r, act AM 4istarg* Of
60 54 amf
-52*413100*E, 0 d1ztanc6bf 65-13 feet. -to ?he
poiftT of o"radivs 6f 21D.W fewt; thence
arc of -slid. i-t0I1tlA-0XrV* to the right
wid conswir
'04t..'4000K Van
w= dimtonew of
-31-49j, fee*�jj,` '-� - � "' , - . :1.
4 ",Pow, an' a in* --Q )"1141- with and lylr
3D
.00 Uer;�m
im
Ilk
741AQ;�, Y alorm sate
Ion
a carva"" 09-4--pm
a mdUi*1mt. 'W4306OW-
cmir "M ew -.167"m Hot&
A
and coa"tj-
6 WWI '71 - feet to
PC. J65.
"M I-Awn,wc dIsfL=m *f
R.100 sow
of
. M
Jm�00
Got
Pw
W2 -fmt; mag
0 -8 cw-m to
aq wc dlz�
lip
and furiher do"
umft.4111 Present and
futum
My' ocrt!cin of
-�"to ffm Opal corporatTaft.
mid 420
X.0
an
TR* wd n"tr of a wtm-U,
saver I irm and.app—t -.'6= ww .pm %,
foll 1cming 4ftcribed -prap", situated
Omzxty of SWINcalsh. State of
Wash I Won, tv-
The soobimstarl 6t d, at right WV10%.
q fe ..!.a Now"
of th&t &scribad ms
follows-. commint-6m at,2ttmi Intersectka.-Of. !tic vestorly riot
Of vOy I Ina Of 148 -buH 1091M NX-th" WIWW'�rjj*t-of-way w
f*Qt) wfTh fte i"'ITr* Of Goveirimmm"t Lct'-3 to Above said
S&Ct fon* 13, Said interjection bej.og 5 SSM000o
W. M.44 f&et
frOm the 11mliwAst CWmr of said Gmarromar Lot 3; theft --a
S 37617*00'W. a1mg !jaTd emstarly r1pr-of-my I Ina, 314.25 test
To TM soutimmsterfy corrw of Lot 5. �Ljodxmy*s M41tion.a
==Hiftg to the PlOt thereof recoriled In VOIuMv tS crf. Plaft, on
PaSIO 1. r6c=cds Of Sn0fxwI5h County, Wasbirt;1t;n, the True Point
Of 13"InAlrog; --m-ce con�tnu;nq S 3-r37100"V. 41" said aestarty
rIghT-of-way I ifte. a dIsUnce -at 187.64 foeir; lbsnc& S 52*43'00-F,
110-00 f66t. t-zam N W3310VE. M-00 fvat; th*=c N 371,7100�E.
50-00 fOst; thUme N WjD'55"E, a distance of 64.36 f&a+ to the
5outhwastarly cornw, Of Lot 4 In said
PIN't Of wUndsay's Addi-
lrlonm; theme 9 al=V The "Gler-ly 11no of- said Lot,,
t. a d:starcs of 65.cv,, to9t to the swibadste- � Corner of Lot 5
In said Pitt of ffiLJmsQw9s Addidlae: tb&nco � ;'21431C,(rW, &ION
thn sourrher I y I I no of sa Id Lot 5. a dI gtacrctv of" 1411- 56 f set 1-0
the True Point Cf'B*g;nrt;nq.
Kalwrena—ze c1f Improvele=tS comtricTed mi-min the initial eas*:;nrt
granted, ronveyea. tra nsferred and oestev9d here I A, m-a 11, bG th� I i ty
L'i an� t"a cc.rT� of said azln,�endmce b--rno apd e
-qua! I i ty +r,% anrye
C)FF(C?AL REC,000,�
,-.A27
-j 94
.1Zlatures this
day 0 f 1972 A.D.
Cedric LI
I-n 120;
10A
-%. Gj��— _. . .. ..- . . ...
STATE OF 31
I desCrIbW'jn -Mod'
ftd Ift 4C.
,*saw that he sic his fre* wali,
nod uses Moroi mmilt ona ANCt /A"
homw Elm off
this
P 97 2 An. 40�.'
31
jo�
U
IWO
.ft&idf
STATE bF
on this day P= y
kmwn to be t24 lnd[Vfdml 4ascribed I
o6d4to mcktuted ttm,�j
$ping Instr=BnT. and gr.�.IedqW ttotn"'i"'. VIA41W fora -
art Wbd deed for the Purposas as'hvr'f r"
') Monti
to" tb"g. Mod-
LMDER my hand and' Iciel
off
day of
1972 A.D.
-x.
us
STATE OF WASwINM4
S5
COUNTY OF��
On th; S day persona I I y appeared be I
or* me *b=Fm=*wv y
:10 the 1ndividQ81 d"Cribed rm and,who (no to on to
26-711'. Ord bCkAowi6dqv4 that she sl9nad 6-�=UtSO V"m Ithin and fOrOSCOng instru-
thg c as h:j- frue voltjrrar- and
deed for The purposes &-m use,_ ttmrain =ptjonmd.
GIVER LOCER my hand and official SeJK*)thls
day of 1* 1972 A-D.
AIX xhi
Res F d 169 a-! -,!�;V_-,_WvzIUw;
STATE OF W.451-UNGT07i I
CDLIW�y OF
-"Y dppeared befora Me WfMilfrad G. HacDo-
jj3jdP
+ de,,;c.rIbbd in and who exOcutcd thO wIThin and fore-
tu and tl�.
. T sno Z!9ned the Sam* &S hcr free Yoluntar
ig�er The -wId,;j&0t Thoreln menfloned,
't _,C 0
0
Z7
00
4 -1 2IS
A k T."
nd T�,
C�_-7;r _ . .
f
L
K
I
CITY OF EDMONDS
D . EPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STF?IEET FILE
250 Fifth Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington
SEPTIC TANK INSTALLATION PLAN
(Submit in Triplicate)
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ........ A ...... zo�lz��-K No ....................... Permit No.,I.,?.,9 .........
Address ... Phone ...... .................
Owner.A
Builder:Z:94� ..... .. - --- - --------- ----- - ..... ....... . Address -----_----- ....... ..................... Phone.. ......................
Designer .... . .... Address ........ ...............
................................... Phone ........................
Installer-..,-- Z_/ ... Address_ X-leA, Phone .....................
g- m installed at the listed
I hereby certify the accompanyi�n rawing is an acCUratc representation of the syste'
address. I also certify all recommendations and restrictions (concerning plumbing stub elevations, maintenance of
grades, fills, Surface drains, etc.) listed by me on my sewage disposal system permit application dated ................
. ....... .... ............................. ... have been complied with.
............ ........ ... . ... I .... .................... I ...... ......................
Date
TO BE FILLED IN BY CITY ENGINEER ONLY
Accepted .......... .... .. X�� ...... �Date .......... _tl .. . ...
Not Accepted .... . . . ........... Date ................... ....................
I V�
Signatureof Sanitarian.. ........... .......................... ............ _ .................................
Remarks: ........................ .................................... ....................... ............... ........................... ........................................................
INSTRUCTIONS: Use the reverse side of this form for the drawing. Use a scale which will permit the greatest
detail and still contain the entire site on one page.
ATTENTION HOME OWNER:
Your septic tank has limitations! It was designed and installed to care for an average -size family. Over-
loading the septic tank or disturbance of the drain -field may seriously impair satisfactory operation. Points to
remember:
1. Have your tank checked periodically to see if pumping is necessary (2y2-3 years).
2. Do not channel ground water, surface water, footing drains or downspouts into the tank or drainfield.
3. Do not excavate, fill, place a structure, driveway or -patio in, on, or ove'r the drainfield.
4. Limit toilet fixture disposal to sanitary wastes and toilet tissue.
5. Detergents and bleaches used in normal household quantities will not hanii the action of the septic tank and
disposal field.
EOWVD V/;�w
4
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
250 Fifth Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington
SEPTIC TANK INSTALLATION PLAN
(Submit in Triplicate)
- 5.� '. ----- ot No ....................... Permit No.lk.,9 ........
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ....... J4 .. 16...
411
Owner, ............ Address.. Phone ........................
Builder
— — --------------------------- .. .... . .. .......... Address. ...... ----------- .... ................. ........... . Phone ...................
T
Designer......... ... . ................................ ........ Address ................ ......................... ......................... Phone ... ....................
Installer.. Address- -:-/ 1".14.1 Phone ................. ......
I hereby certify the accompanying rawing is an accurate representation of the system installed at the listed
.address.. I also certify all recommendations and restrictions (concerning plumbing stub elevations, maintenance of
grades, fills, Surface drains, etc.) listed by me on my sewage disposal.. system permit application dated ................
.. ..... ........................... have been complied with.
....................
...............................
S
Dat
T TO BE FILLI
0 BE FILLED IN BY CITY ENGINEER ONLY
.. . ......
Accepted.-'. Date ..........
Not Accepted ........ ...... Date. . ... ....
Signature of Sanitarian ...... : ....... .. ....... ................ .........
Remarks: .............................................................. ...... ------------------------------------------------------ -------_----_--
............................................................................................ ............ ........................................ ...........................................
INSTRUCTIONS: Use the reverse side of this form for the drawing. Use a scale which will,permit the greatest
detail and still contain the entire site on one page.
ii
ATTENTION HOME OWNER:
Your septic tank has limitations! It was designed and installed to care for an average -size family. Over-
loading the septic tank or disturbance of the drain -field inay seriously impair satisfactory operation. Points to
remember:.
1. Have your tank checked periodically �o 'see if pumping is necessary (2V2-3 years).
drains or downspouts into the tank or drainfield.
2. Do not channel ground water, surface water, footing,
3. Do not excavate, fill, place a structure, driveway or. patio in, on, or over the drainfield.
4.. Limit toilet fixture disposal to sanitary wastes and toilet tissue.
5. Detergen : ts and bleaches used in normal household quantitie s will not harin t.he action of the septic tank and
disposal field.
0 6 0 0
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
250 Fifth Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington
APPLICATION FOR A SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
(Submit 3 Copies)
Permit to be issued --------- o.:2_.a.0x.L6 . ...........
For installation' at: (street address) --- ............. U ......... P/ ........ .........................................
. ....... .... ...
Additionor Subdivision .............................................................. ... _ .............................. ..... Lot ..... .......... Block ................
Type of Building: New ............ Existing .... Single family residence ...... K ...... Number of* bedrooms: ........ 4-111 .......
Other: (specify type or use) ................. .................. ...................... .............. ...........................................................................
Builder......... .................................... ..................... -------- ....... Address ...................... .......................... ....... ..............................
Designer................................... ................. -------------------------------- Address ..... .......... ... .......................... ................................. ------
Soil Log Hole No. I ----- ..... . ...
SoilLog Hole No. 2-, ------- ----- ------------ * ------------------------ , ----------------- ---------------------- * ........................................................
Elevation of Water Table, if encountered. (Distance from ground surface) . ................ .................................... ..............
orrections to control surface water if needed: ............ ......................................... .................................................................
......................................... .......................................................................................................................................... ......................
Specify if any removing or grading of topsoil in field area— _----------- ............................ ..................................................
......................................................................................................................................... ................................................................
Percolation:
Test Hole No; 1 —Average Rate ........ . . ....................... ....... .. (Fall in ininutes/inch-bottom 6" test hole)
Test Hole No. 2 —Average Rate ...... inin'
......... w .......................... -(Fall -in utes/inch-bottom 6" test hole).,
Test -Hole No. 3—'Average Rate--.-/10 ..................... ...... (Fall in minutes/inch-bottom 6" test hole)
7 .0(, 6
Average percolation rate on which to base drain field design .... A Date Taken . ............
Septic tank requirements based on present rules and regulations:
Septic Tank Size .... ........... gallons.'
/'76
Amount of Square Feet of Disposal Field. ------ .... ..... .
Signature — Designer .............. ------- L,_N..wsA_� ......... ------------------ Date ----- -------_---- ... . .......
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
r/ 9
Permit issued (date) ........... /0 ... ....... ............... Permit Number .......... .....................
Remarks: ..................................................................................................... ............ .......................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ * ------ - ------- : .............. ................................................................
S WAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT
No. -- ---------
Septic Tank ............ 76�) ------ gals. CITY OF EDMONDS
Department of Public Works
Disp. Field ------------ ...... sq. ft.
Other... ... -----------------------------
is hereby authorized to install/
--------------------------------------------------
r
Name ------ ----------------- - ------------------ epair sewage disposal system at
-------------------------------- ------- ----------------------------------- -------------
V,
.............
Date issued on ------------- A ...... ---------------------------
Permit expires one year from date of issue
BY DESIGNER OR SANITARIAN
DO NOT,.C6VtR BEFORE APPROVED
the City
nd complies with all provisions of
s installed under my supervision and control a
I hereby certify this system wa
of Edmonds Resolutions.
Signature of Installeni! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date ----------------------------------
Approved fA. Disapproved FJ --------- ----------------------- By --- -- - ------------------------------
Remarks: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date----------------------------------------------------------
SANITARIAN OR DESIGNER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
reasonably conspicuous I place on the job until inspection has been completed.
This permit shall be posted in a
Test Hole No. Number of Minutes
To Seep Last 12".
4
2 7
3 15
4 12
5 16
6 6
Total 60
Average 10
June 21, 1964
Number of Minutes
To Seep Last 61t.
z
4
10
7
12
3.5
36.5
6.4 or
1.06 in./min.
Procedure: Holes dug approximately 2511 deep., spaced evenly in area of proposed
drain field. Holes filled to top several times and allowed to seep out. Test run
made in latter half of 1 hour period. Weather clear, ground moist but not wet.
Seep in most cases aopeared rapid at first and slower toward the end.
Propose to use 85 spuare feet per bedroom or 255 square feet in standard trench 24"
deep, 1.5 feet wide, and 170 feet long*
C-
AIL
City of Edmonds Permit No: (!511 4:2.57,
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT Issue Date:'
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: bml("
B. Type of Work (be specific): U11 G I 1�/ I
AfAY -
C. Contractor: Ate7�u-EgAt-1 6064577 ILL -
- MailingAddress: 20,
State License
D. Building Permit # (if applicable
111VU
Contact: DIVIS101V
Phone: 2_cK, - 6"3 azoo
Liability Insurance: Bond: $
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable
E. E] Commercial Subdivision EJ City Project -0 EUC (PUD, GTE, PSE, CHAMBERS, OVWD)
Multi -Family Single Family F-1 Other
INSPECTOR-
F. PAVEMENT: YES F1 NO G. SIZE OF CUT x H. Charge: S
CONCRETE CUT: YES P< NO
APPLICANTTO READ AND SIGN
JDkMNITY.- Applicant understands by hislher signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harmless from injuries,
damages or claims of any kind or description whaisoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds or
any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and
attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERLILS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND A CCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMA TED RESTORA TION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PA TCH IS
COMPLETED B Y CITY FORCES, A T WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT.
* Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every
flagger must be. trained as required. by (WAC) 296-155-305 and must have certification verify!P5 completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to be in accordance with City codes. All,.street-cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS. 'ry
* Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are requiredmith the permit application.
IRAVEREAD THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND"ACKNOWLEDGE
-THATIMUSTMAKE THEPINKCOPYOF THE PERMIT A VAILABLE ONSITEATALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
Signature:
S�
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK . t�,,
FOR CYIN
AOiproved by:
Time. Authorized:, Void After t3Vji?1f-,S 9J4!0*Vd
E ONLY
Right-of-way Fdlo f 1-5 a,_C1_W4
r
Disruption, Fee/Fui
Restoratiqp Fee:
Total Fee-t_)6.
Receipt No':
Issued by:
UPON COMPLETION OF PERMITTED WORK, AN ENGINEERING FINAL
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED PER CHAPTER 18.00 OF THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVEL T
FINAL APPROVAL OF PERMITTED WORK: MN-
INShECTOR'S SIGNATURE DATE:..31,�S �O2-:
For inspection requirements see. Engineering Information Handout.
NO WORK SI-IALL BEGIN PRIORTo PERNIIT ISSUANCE
City of Ednionds
RIGHT-OF-WAY-CONSTRUCT10N PERMIT'
A. Address or Vicinity of Cpi
B. Type of Work (be spdcific
L
C. Contractor: P, 0—V t
Mailing Address:
State License#: L
ction: 1 0 - I
1 14 1 �.J
'13
D. Building Permit-# (if applicable)-
) E_.
I.J
F� Commercial
r_1 Multi -Family
INSPECTOR:
I
A. v I
� "I A
4— 1 A -7 �5 �) 6
Contact: SA.9 ',b
Phone: o U.�
Permit
PEA
r&ffjtM
Issue Date: -- 18_Z4 _2Zx*
L OA10" �04�-
J�
Lo
Li4bility Insurance: Bond: $
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
Subdivision City Project E] EUC (PUD, VERIZON, PSE, AT& T, OVWD)
Single Family Other
F. PAVEMENT CUT: [W YES F—INO G. SIZE OF CUT x
CONCRETE CUT: [I YES EINO
Al"I'LICANT TO IZEAD ANI) SIGN
INDEMNITY.,, Applicant understands by his/her signature to this application helshe holds the City of Edmonds harml , ess ftom
injuries, damages or' claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against thrcity Of
',Edmonds or any of'Its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
'costs and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING. THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE. WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES 97LL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS
COMPLETED BYCITYFORCES, AT WHICH TIMEA DEBITOR CREDIT WILL BEPROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICANT.
* Traffic control and public safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer. Every.
flagger must be trained as required by (WAC) 246-155-305� and must have certification verifying completion of the
required training in their possession.
* Restoration is to be in accordance -with City.codes. All street -cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City -
approved material prior to the end of the workday — NO EXCEPTIONS.
Three sets of construction drawings of proposed work are required with the permit application.
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-MO-4214-5555) PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
IHAVEREAD THE ABOVE STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND ACKNOWLEDGE
THAT I MUST MAKE THE PINK COPY OF THE PERMITA VAILABLE ON STfE A TALL TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
Date.- 7-c9/-
Signature.-! fl� i(I'l- "k-^
(Contractor or Agent)
FOR CITY USEONLY
Approved by'- Right-of-wav,fee: I
'Time Authorized: Void After 10 2.q / 2604 Disruption Fee/Fund 111:
Special Conditions: Mdjlt�4 fb�M-,J" MIOP&M Restoration Fee:
1JA I. AOL Total Fee:
99LOL 0) 1AINx SJ=. LVK� LZ
LIU <11"WDC L&a6U -M Ua M Receipt No:
Aij i rrA 4 0 Issued by:
-7
�W.Q L--- jM2W,--n(h_.i - A572t 4 3MOL Y2407122&Ildt'j, ff5
UPON'COMPLETION OFPERMITTED W0RJK,,,,"ANENGI NEERING FINAL, -
INSPECTION IS REQUIRED -AR CHAPTER 18.00--Of THE EDMONDS'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (P
,hp 2 1-0220, Ext. 1326)
10, �15
)UNAL APPROVAL OFPERMITTED WORK. de
DATE: 0
i9soector's Signature
For inspection
see
Information handout.
NO WOIZK SHALI. BEGIN I'MOIZ TO UTIMIT ISSUANCE
D:\My Documents\Forms\Engnmg\ROWpermit_.doe
d4b IS/
454
\0
65 A)
U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T
IN CONSIDERATION OF BENEFITS TO ACCRUE TO THE GRANTORS HEREIN3 THE UNDERSIGNED.3
CEDRIC E. LINDSAY AND E, SUZANNE LINDSAY *
HEREBY GRANT TO THE CITY OF EDM0NDSj A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR
THE INSTALLATION, OPERATI.ON) AND MAINTENANCE OF SANITARY SEWER LINE
OVER, ACROSS, THROUGH AND BELOW THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED PROPERTY, AND THE FURTHER RIGHT TO REMOVE TREES, BUSHES, UNDERGROWTH AND OTHER
OBSTRUCTIONS INTERFERING WITH THE LOCATION, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SAID UTILITY
OR UTILITIESo
THE EASE'MENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY HEREBY GRANTED IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISHP
S-TATE .�0-F-'WXSH-1-N:GTON-i--A-ND--l-5--MO-RE-P�,KRTI-C-UL-ARL-Y�--Dt7SC'RIBED- AS -FOLLOWS: �
THE NORTHWESTERLY 10 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT:
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SEC. 139 Twp. 27N, R3E, WoM*9 WITH THE
EASTERLY LINE OF THE GREAT NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY;
THENCE 3 371171 wo 322.49 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 52*431 Eq 148-56 FEET; THENCE S 37'17' Wq 65 FEET;
THENCE 5 380411 Eo 82.46 FEET; THENCE S 52043' wo 90 FEET TO
THE WIESTERLY MARGIN OF SOUND VIEW PLACE; THENCE 3 37*171 wt
81.11 FEET; THENCE N 52?43' Wt 87.25 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL
TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3t TO A POINT 62-33 FEET DUE EAST OF
THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE GREAT NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY;
THENCE N 521431 Wt 4.8.62 FEET TO SAID RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE
ALONG THE SAID RIGHT—OF—WAY9 306 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE CITY AGREES TO RESTORE TO SUBSTANTIALLY THE ORIGINAL CONDITION SUCH IMPROVE-
MENTS AS ARE DISTURBED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION� MAINTENANCE AND.REPAIR OF SAID UTILITY Of�
UTILITIES; PROVIDEDj THE GRANTORS, THEIR HEIRS OR ASSIGNS SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY PERMANENT
STRUCTURE OVER, UPON OR WITHIN THE PERMANENT EASEMENT.
DATED THIS DAY OF AK, A2 i L 19 &,,9'7
STATE OF WASHINGTON
SS
COUNTY OF
THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME
J 2) 7, d Ad 9 11_1A),05-AV j TO ME KNOWN'TO BE THE INDIVIDUAL (S) DESCRI
IN AND WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENTj AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT
SIGNED THE SAME AS FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AqB'-D)EEDj FOR THE USES ANO PURPOSES
THEREIN MENTIONED,
(/N
�FO
oi
A R BLIC IN AND
R THY -,STATE OF
C4
W S I
WASHI GTON.1,RESIDING
'T
AT Olt'_QA40,Q7J
"'40 SALPz
C%�
REQU
0
.w
U0.
ct
OFFICIAL RECORDS
U4
JUN 12 1567
C.:) U,
C> < Ll-:
a- a:
116
-VOL PAGE728
IT,
I RECEIVED
NE
[PERMIT
EXPIRE
CITY OF EDMONDS
us: ERMIT
ZONE
UMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION
JOB SUlTE/APT#
ADDRESS
OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS
PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO.
LOT NO.
LID NO..
MAILING ADDRESS
LID FEE S
-7 0-:44- - i I <(Ai
PUBLIC, RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP
TESCP Approved
RW Farrnit Required
Street Use Pernift RWd
Inspection Required
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE
EXISTING - PROPOSED
Sidewalk Required
L I? #j AjW 13 0 "N R 9 0 7, 42 <'- *71h oo
"'REQUIRED DEDICATION-"-__� FT
Undergrotind
Wiring required
NAME
METER SIZE
LINE SIZE
7� 0 IXIURES
PRV REQUIRED
A "06-9
A"
YES NO 13
x
ADDRESS
PA( A \1 1E_
REMARKS
OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE
im,
-,IV —
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
-rA 4-00KA 9 8+0 -2,
ZTS
A_ff MAU, 0k:mKhko0
NAME
CBL[
e-AA T A)(
ys (I)PS
U�6�
ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE
cc
0
ADDRESS
_T
:; + -3 4e_: 9� (4. f— a f-IJ f T 9,OA'b
FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE
CITY ZIP
TELEPHONE
M
8
A 603cl
7-W 0-7V
.
.
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION
C!.JECJKE
VARIANCE OR Cul
01 SHORELINE OR ADS#
INSPE CTION
REO*D
Is
BOND
POSTED
,7ATE
14� 7- D
OYE��o
SEPA REVIEW
SIGN AREA 4""
HEIGHT
4
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO.
COMPLETE EXEMPT
ALLOWED PROPOSED
ALLOWED PROPOSED
EXP
NEW
RESIDENTIAL
PLUMBING / MECH
LOT COVERAGE
ALLOWED PROPOSED
REQUIRED SETBACKS
FRONT SIDE R
PPROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.)
"FRONT LIRSIDE REAR
E] ADDITION
COMMERCIAL
COMPLIANCE OR
CHANGE OF USE
0 1 1
0, 101 1
10
z
E] REMODEL
MULTIFAMILY
-SIGN
PARKING LOT AREA LANNING REVIEWED BY DATE
REO'D PRO
�IDEZ
es
la� A 0 Gomu: �)Cp_
G FENCE
0 REPAIR 0 CYDS I X Fr)
S
OTHER
0 DEMOLISH 1:1 TANK
Evn(_ rk C
GARAGE RETAINING WALL FIRE SPRINKLER
1:1 FIRE
CARPORT ROCKERY ALARM
(rYPE OF USE, BUSINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN:
*J
CHF,CKED BY TYPE
OVID
_WCTION
C#�
U
OCC PAUL
GROUX3
NUMBER
OF
21'
NUMBER OF
DWELLING
I
P
CRITICAL %�)l I , "
AREAS jz
- /lie
SPECIAL INSPECTION
JAREA I
Oc CUPANT
LOA D
STORIES t
UNITS
NUMBElio/
MIRED r-YYES
,z�t,,57 3 C
DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE
REMARKS
PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION REG'D
j jr k. Welle X,
V
it /a
A #2,631-r
n cn r 41
VALUATION
/Pan 1" /1,-, 0 2
4L4 F ILA- P
$ qvv)
Descripti
E
Description
FEE
Plan Check
LF
51;�I' 1) % "
State Surch
I !, �p
I
I�Asc
HEAT SOURCE
GLAZING %
LOT SLOPE %
Building Permit
Pr
City Surcharge
)
PLAN CHECK NO:
VESTED DATE
Plumbing
q3q
ez
Mechanical
j
t:
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO
BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX AM CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC
23
Grading
DOMAIN (CURRS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE
SEPARATE PERMISSION.
Engr. Review
IL
PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS
'350
PERMIT LIMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS
Engr. Inspection
SEE 13ACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION
'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS
Fire Review
Plan Chk. Deposit
a
IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON. ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND
Fire Inspection
Receipt #
ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER MATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE
Landscapelnsp.
Total Amt. Due
1010 64 5�
0
zi
NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITYS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION!
TRZipt
Recording Fee
#
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION
GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF
APPLICATION
APPROVAL
THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC-
CALL
This application is not a permit until signed by the
TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED
Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and
IN VIOLATION OF THE LABORSDDE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO
FOR INSPECTION
receipt Is acknovAedged In space provided.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSAT19"SOJANCE AND RCW 18.27.
OFFICIALS SIGNATURE DATE
SIGNATURE (OWNER 0
DATE SIGNED
771-0220
"R
AT
ATTENTION
M 1333
IT IS UNLAWFUL.TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL
A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI-
ORIGINAL - FILE - YELLOW INSPECTOR
CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR
04/02 GREEN . ACCOUNTING
HARD ARE
PRESS -YOU
MAKING 5 COF4S
6010113e, E
k7l-
144.42'
47 5Vj
X
'A
lu
f: 04
2
too
+4A
if
fj) "07
po
N 52'43,g)o. W
110.
co 1��Oo Or, Gty-(ebL
06 2i
06
r)e-464,f 4.
cl Incl
(9-v e- I oF
rl�-r rrP I � �
--j-c .
1:21 ncl
N -43, O-C -
52
p3o-r 2L
-�Oe I w
qpt �K-
do
c'jq' roo C-1
V
4h
ro oaA
4+ h C)�
c
rY)ea4C,
cri C) cl
g6ir,-- -4;tz i,.F.
palve .14:5-3 -,.F.
—FAllio.-
C7- (dS. c�o
AsJ6. 40AM r IS'. 1& (0
fw-lic>u C, og
4t
IPFAf rf2CtA AS NOTED
"A ENGINEERiNG
/,00 4?
ltx ,too
e, .4' Date:
CREEK
LINE
.0
4, (,q,
T. t2ts-T-16=2 s;ie.- t;; V.
w %zip fz&r
;,e
XXX SOUND VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS
SNOHOM15H COUNTY
0m
SCALE 1.-20
ITTY COPY
APMOVED By 111-0111f
,-7 ALA- r,:;�00 f\OST z
-r&4F09Ax*f //F-D
T t4&ItJ fLt-AW-.
APR 0 12004
P
PERMIT COUNTER
21.41' 9C4911 -,.f.
31
Ir oeu 't
14
IN
t'. 4li
141,
Ol
1-4
Z�s
'J� Ali
A16
Pz
7r"
tip
- J-0
If,
0 RECEIVED
To the City of Edmonds: APR 112003
P�RMIT P,0UNTE
This is a request for a vacation of a portion of a City of Edmonds Storm ewer aseme'nP,
To be. replaced with a new storm sewer easement, dedicated to the City of Edmonds.
Le * gal description of the 10 foot wide storm sewer easement, recording No. 2244215, to
be vacated, said easement is located across Lot B, City of Edmonds Lot Line Adjustment
No. LL-2000-74, and recorded under Snohomish County Recording No. 200009275007.
That portion of said storm sewer easement lying Northwesterly of the following
described line:
Beginning at the Southwest comer of said Lot B;
thence South 52'043' 00" East, along the Southwesterly line of said Lot B, 110.00 feet;
thence North 88* 33' 00" East 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of said line;
thence North 37"17' 00" East 50.00 feet;
thenceNorth 58010' 55" East 20 feet, more or less, to the South bank of the existing
stream and end of said line.
The vacated storm sewer easement across a portion of said Lot B, as described above, to
be replaced by the following described 10 foot wide storm sewer easement;
That portion of said Lot B, City of Edmonds Lot Line Adjustment No. LL-2000-74,
Recording No. 200009275007, described as follows:
The Northwesterly 20 feet on width of said Lot B, EXCEPT the Northwesterly 10
feet thereof; ALSO that portion of said Lot B described as' follows:
Beginning at the So uthwest comer of said Lot B;
thence South 520 43' 00" East 20.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence continuing South 52043' 00" East 90.00 feet;
thence North 8833' 00" East 15.98 feet;
thence North 52� 43' 00" West 102.47 feet to a point 20.00 feet Southwesterly of
the Northwesterly line of said Lot B;
thenceSouth 37'17' 00" West 10.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
From information gained from the City of Edmonds, the portion of the Storm Sewer
Easement that is being requested vacated, has never been maintained by the City.
The owner of Lot B, installed and maintained the existing storm sewer that is located in
the Easement that is being asked to be vacated, and agrees to replace and maintain the
future stonn sewer within the new proposed Storm Sewer Easement, and to replace the
storm sewer per City of Edmonds regulations.
Owner Lot B NTE;W4�447 Cedric Lindsay (360) 796-4276
I 744-Point Whitney Road
cc:Bill Semon (Lindsay representative(425)672-1118) Brinnon, WA 98320
s;we
I�ECEIVED
PEIR 112003
RII COUNTER
OT,
FE co C/* /16-
14. t4ol
R, a.-Tmr-
0 Z
'ox �
4 cooYc. C414
Ilk
r
Alo
Ile,
meN if-
Im
Cop
.,* V
6SAI r COO arlL.
224qLZJS
JA
4 "e
jv 0 7,49
104-212A
Address: 19711 - Lindsay Pl.
Map No:
Interceptor?
man rin-qp-
at SW end of street. Flows
to CB # 4-212
Maintenance Dates
Last Inspection:
Last Vector Out/ Inspected:
Last Rod Inlet/Outlet:
11/29/199�
2/25/20021
Last Root Treatment:
Last Rehabilitation:
Date Constructed: 11/1/199�
Tasks, Histow-11 cndpl;
task dptail
task no.
task code
dist. rodded TL
task done?:
done by:
date done:
15065
CHECK
KC
11/29/1999
17042
CLEAN1
—be
DB
5/30/2000
17042
CLEANI
DB
3/3012001
17042
CLEAN 1
DB/AB
2/25/20021
1/7H SAD (EF
t -0
tl
/47-
001 00w-v 0. 7
po 7F
--SAY;- 0�7
Z24a4ls 0 VA
fit
10
&
N-1
lip
*47
42
x
--074,
000
L
10
14 —N
P
z
po
ti
va
roe 416 A ol 4. 4 07
D
04Rr �ww, mor -�coamp
N V,
C
L12.4 0
--411. V.
ESAtlr, iVA? tO
----- . . . . . .
A.
20
sej�vc-Y w.,9.y mgoc- ov rRqvaxxa a-wlwa.
4/49rZ- 45 0 Al 34.4 42 AVAIC
tz - 04.
ac,
7 72
ID
BASIS FOR BEARIN.G.- - LINDSAY ADD- PLAT.
M- ONUMENTS ON THE 't OF SOUND VIEW PL--
SCALE: 1 50
J-
0 /00 ISO
R. F. m I OINTERV P- L. S.
LOT LME ADJUS
GOVT. LOT 33 S
SNOHOMISH Co.
Air
Q
m
l,".42%
A9
47 0
4z
Al -
00'
le /os-
C15 !13 ....... .
'N
I- W, OL
25T ------
z
VIA
Oj
'01
-A
4
10-nd 6/)cl '43'9)0- W
to
06 'e,— v . .....
Cb -28
06 -ft"O-t-
)A
409, on
Ac \,AfCL Js�
Ot O-C V jp,�On i e�'lv e, I oF
Oy')---4r
P-1
N 52 w
21-S41
Ot
tc� aj q. CO
COC
ri 4-
v
0-� c 70
COVCWvb 44-)e i9h&E)+ 0� 4�lw
+
011 A
oes M eOQGvyej WOO) rx
6
cyliz C.)-y-czcje-
V,
I
'6W 1�
s
1 HEET FILE
q7.6 F.,F
SZE.
T
A;;��77
ARE 9 a 1: � I,:
FILE
-rF
APPROVED AS NOTED
BY.ENGINEERING
-ECEIVED
R
Date: APR - 12004
-,e 6iradjP7 lar PERMIT COUNTER
p"dKs p IdA
oLrrFwvw -re, I &HT 4.61,Ck
-7
P91*4
ov
5's-sh r
... 2-- -3-& 0,
H&T. ;XLw 19
60. 1?,016&
90 Lf. X �Z4
ezl�k- ti pro 1/4
ru
Ai","HOVED AS NOTED
Ey ENGINEERING
PROPOSED Date:
CREEK
A,
FA IWJ 6 F ff*"
Al
T. ;;.reu
-Or
ng,
GA AGE W/W4f FLZAF
MY
XXX SOUND VIEW DRIVE
EDMONDS
SNOHOMISH COUNT*r
SCALE 1:20 DRIV�WAY
IRV, ce%py
b APPROVED BY PLANNI
ITY v
AAl' f%
- K?05(00- - -'-- OST
'WffVED
--R
C60 t4&%tJ
4<3s ':i f� APR 012004
0 4 P A, PERMIT COUNTER
e " 33'00'
21.41' 94orl 113.6 -3
"t Ar
-T
a
APPROVED AS NOTED
BY EN INEERITG
Date:—
4?
go x �Z4 Ilk 00,
ezll_� tipro Jo
(TAN4 ��-
voi-ime
4-nboTwO6 AA., /
;?a,)F A FtzrP P& W-61 '-�
.r. 5P�L, W
pi f
/ / "i --- k
z
xxx BOUND VIEW DRIVE
EDMOND5
5NOHOM15H COUNTY
5CALE 1:20
LUQ-
rf, I
-ro
'64e,"
40
9.0
F t IPA6 If
OT. L_
f;-r6,. , "C.1)45
A
CMEK�
5 8-.-% r
Jouc, 24. 09 $eo
W
lb
APPROVED AS NOTED
By ENGINEERING
Date:
PLftvQ 04W671E,
ft:F-�H-T C"+Lcs
4 *mov—� Vt.7ev.
Pr FFAF
STREET FILE
APPROVED BY PLANNING
%
'L-RecieroiD
lz_ PLOW- 1:51410 1
APR 0 J-2004
WrA.Ll '!>l F—
No PERMIT COUNTER
MA.,
20'
R/W
-GRASS - 9, 9, GRASS
I —PAVEMENT PAVEMENT
Lei,
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SCALE: NONE
PLOT PLAN
—SCALE. 1"T'4MO�
FITTER
(CHECK BOX IF COMPLETE)
'IM2,11VT
S
. SIDE
VCH SALDLE
cil
Work area left in Clean & Safe onditio
Complete all Pipe Tables and Gas Pressure�Staraa___.�-
Field changes Red -Lined on as -built E]
Material verified and Changes oted on paperwork 1:1
All Valve & Tie-in Lo ations noted on as -built 0
Note beginning of Main, EOM & Line of Main locations 1:1
Show Rope Locations & Cul-de-sac Radius El
Foreman's Signature
Company
Date
STANDARD GAS CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
I. FIELD LOCATE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. EXCAVATOR TO CALL 'ONE -CALL" TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO
TO CONSTRUCTION, IN WESTERN WASHINGTON CALL: 1-800-424-5555. IN KITTITAS COUNTY CALL: 1-800-553-4344
2. NOTIFY APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY PRIOR TO J013 START (SEE PERMIT REQUIRMENTS).
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION IS TO CONFORM TO PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS AND GAS FIELD PROCEDURES.
4. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PER PSE STANDARD PRACTICE 0150.3200 TECHNIQUES FOR TEMPORARY
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND ANY ADD17IONAL LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.
5. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS
PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. USE ISi TO DISTRIBUTE FLYERS IF JOB IS LARGE, OTHERWISE HAND
DELIVER FLYERS BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE LIST OF FREQUENTLY ASKED QUES71ONS AND INFORMATION ABOUT
THE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE AN EXCESS FLOW VALVE MEN THEIR SERVICE IS INSTALLED OR REPLACED
PER GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2550.1600. ALLOW ADEQUATE TIME FOR CUSTOMER DECISION AND RESPONSE.
6. ANY CHANGE IN ROUTE. PIPE SIZE/TYPE, TIE-IN METHOD OR ADD17IONAL MAIN FOOTAGE MUST BE APPROVED BY
THE APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE.
7. COMPLETE "PIPE COND111ON REPORT" ON ALL METALIC PSE FACILITIES. CHECK BOX ON REPORT FOR WIRE
BOX (TEST LEAD) INSTALLATION.
8. PIPELINE MARKERS AND WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED BY THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS
OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2500.
9. INSTALL MAIN VALVES OUT OF TRAFFIC WHERE POSSIBLE. VALVE MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND RECORDED By
THE CONTRACTOR PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARD 2525.2600 FOR ALL HP VALVES IF THE LOCA71ON IS
NOT READILY ACCESSIBLE, AND FOR ALL VALVES MERE PERSISTANT SNOWFALL MAY OBSCURE THE VALVE BOX.
10. TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL OVERPRESSURE OF ADJOINING SYSTEMS, NO TWO MAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED EXCEPT AS
SHOWN ON THIS DESIGN UNLESS APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE PSE ENGINEER OR PSE REPRESENTATIVE.
11. SYSTEM MAOP DENOTED BY. ISYSTEM MAOP = -45-- PSI
12. GAUGE AND MONITOR USE OF ALL STOPPERS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FEED.
13. RESTORE ALL DRIVEWAYS SUBJECT TO OPEN CUT TO ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION.
14. PURGE POINTS AND PRESSURE TAPS TO BE INSTALLED PER PSE GAS OPERATING STANDARDS 2525.3300. AND 2525.1200.
15. MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE TESTED AND PURGED PER PSE GAS OPERA71NG STANDARDS 2525.3300 AND 2525.3400.
16, IF METALLIC PIPE IS INVOLVED, COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH CP TECH.
--------- . PHONE ---------
17. NOTE ALL ACTUAL FOOTAGE, LOCATION AND MATERIAL CHANGES ON THE AS -BUILT IN RED. DENOTES
FOOTAGE BETWEEN FITTINGS.
GAS MAIN INSTALLA710NIRETIREMENT
TypeMork
Pipe Size
Type
Estimated
Length
Actual
Length
Manufacturer
INSTALL
2"
PE
145
CASMAIN PrIESSLIF F TERTINCI -
IYPETEST I
PRESgURE
TESTEU BY
DATE ON
TIME ON
DATE OFF
TIME OFF
TYPE TEST
TP34WLTAME
DATE ON
TIME ON
DATE OFF ITIME
OFF
Design Press 60 PSIG I
SYS MAOP 45
PROJECT
PHASE
N071FO
ORDERS
SAP Superior
Service/Meter
Servica/Meter
Service/Meter
Servloa/Meter
Ind. Service
Ind. MSA
Dis. Reg. / FT
HP Svc(MSA
Relocate
RetIrement
X050578477
107020724-
X636050534
106134000
Contractor CONSTRUCTION COST CODES:
041-103-1
Project Manager Contact Inforrnation:
PATTI NESS
CELL: 425-327-2783
EMAIL: patti.ness@pse.com
REV# DATE By DESCRIPTION
-3
-2
COUNTY EMER SECT
SNOHOMISH 4
1/4 SEC OP MAP
SE-13-27-03 160.062
Vicinity Map
--- -------
7;
LI
�.l
kl.'� S T
IE NDS A
ri 19
Owner/ Developer Contact info
TOM BRAATEN CONSTRUCTION INC.
EVERGREEN PT RD
MEDINA WA, 98039
ATTN: SAME 206-498-0756 office
CALL (800) 424-5555
2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU Die
THIS SVJ--TCH NOT TO BE RELIED UPON FOR EXACT LOCATION OF FACtLmES
REAL ESTATE/EASEMENT
REQ'D
PERMIT
EDMONDS
FUNCTION
CONTACT
PHONE
DATE
PROJECT MGR
PAT71 NESS
206-418-4237
)7-15---04
ENGR-GAS
DRAWNBY
VIDANG
206-418-4257
)7-15-04
CHECKEDBY
PATTI NESS
206-418-4237
67-15'-04
GAS WK CTR APPROVED BY
MNSNHG. CP APPROVAL
PLATMAP
161.067 MAPPING
JOINT FACILITIES ARRANGEMENTS
UTILITIES
CONTACT
PHONE#
. . . . . . PUGET SAP Superior Order
SOUND TOM BRAATEEN CONSTRUCTION INC 107020724
Drawing Number.'
EMMGY 2" PE 1P MAIN BRANCH EXTENSION NIA
18916 SOUNDVIEW PLACE EDMONDS WA, 98026 SCALE: 1PAGE:
DESIGNED BY PILCHUCK CONITRACTORS INc.
F,A—AM
v., �4-&,
APPROVED AS NOTED
BY ENGINEERING
Date:
IFIRE AND AID ADDRESS 31% REQUIRED
ACCEP -IABLE-TiGHTLINE-
MATERIAL
SDR 35
SCH 40'
N - 12
F81 0 HANCOR
uw�";_ ks ftt\.) -we-a" mvl;q�
vvf—va3 --ijjjgw�& 1-2qjrfo3
7-c
OWNER/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE
FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE
& sEWER
WATER
INSpECTIONS REQU
.1326
CALL 426-771-0220 E * XT
JW
. . ...... . .. .. .. .. .. . ...... ...... . .
4
to's
Z
Z;kloAp�� Am.: ez S.
IR
UAc
XXX 5�
;,,t 00
SNOH SWCOUNTr
0,_
16C - A 0--�
t-TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
70 -.'
R
ENTRANCE REQUI ED
Ar
�Vn
-coo._
7
0.
2Z
21�
-4
T
49 f9pl::�
�t,
JZ JE4_4-, 7FaX2-
rr - -E>ftj�
:��7C- S
*ZAT
.jref m.-qA>.'A96,
-6;
AL�
Pi D40
!tv
BY PLANNI
eool
I'D
% C5
F
ECF.JVF.D;�
4
-APPLICA"TCOn'
N
FtB 2 6
14.q
eta, L
APPROVED As NOTED
BY ENGINEERINJ
- �&IOQA
721,L2�A64
Date: - - -
FIRE AND AID ADDRESS. SIGN REQUIRED
AG, c; E. PIABLE T IGHTLINE
0ERIA4
SDR 35
SCH 40
N- 12
FBI 0 HANCOR
?Of- Do�l -vl-lewel- Vzlk-1:103. 4.
t*vrftll. Vol""
OWNER/CONTRACT
9 1 r- Ot 1 ON C 0! 'f;!� 0, L A N P, D.
WATER & SEWER
INSPECTIONS REGM -
CALL 425-771-0220. EXT. 1326
,r— A24
0ATIO
0 EK
L NE
Aill
04, - -n
0 Lopt(L r�t3skv)-� -�?�
+
r7 100-77
A,jeIZA&C-- <jfzNV6
vwxlHuH Au.-Owf,-p
tjz?)s,*v vyr�1&141-
X-
f C6,
1,41
T
. K (p.
'0�
XXX SOUND VIEW rLA69
Aw favF"
4:!�pTfwu Hfaj�ogo6- mo-si-
5NOHOMISH
COUNTY
SCALE
1:20
TEMPORA RY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE REQUIRED
loe
��'P 0,0M
2"4
i�.Q.F-r
urmv_ FLOM
riper., FIr
-ro-rAL.
rplio-7
1033,00, w
21.41'
-)(-- KVeA�,) '�--COA*A Gq &-VC—M -X0 ?--lF_—f24eU-U]F ),!!:? I
S,� W-Ak)
-ve W-511mi-Anal 4542 <lq F-r
r--r
(qA
APPROVED BY PLANNING
R A.t�U,Vrj, D
FEB 2'6 2004
(NITY COPY
PERMIT COUNTER
3
f L./
m
STREE"T FILE
TF pL/A-�J
I 11, v C
k
rl,5-v.k
RF
.C:F
FEIB 2 i 2004
pERMI-f CoUNTER
cl
13
Ge'a`btf\�� k DoPA",3Qe?F,
4- <s at�-- PcA-r\j
STREET FILE
rz F.,-8E� �l F. D
FEB 2 6 2004
PERMIT COUNTER
IST