19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR.PDF19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
ADDRESS: 1Z0 S v—
TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL #: Zeq Qe0O0LF30
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE) #:
COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR:
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
CRITICAL AREAS #: DETERMINATION: ❑ Conditional Waiver ❑ Study Required ❑ Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED:
EASEMENT(S) RECORD FOR:
PERMITS (OTHER — list permit #'s): ,6 q
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED:
SEWER LID FEE $:
LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE:
LOT:
BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED::Al ( ( ID
STREET USE/ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
OTHER:
L:\TEMP\DST's\Forms\Jana's Street File Checklist 5-14-08.doc
OF EDAf
O
U c/t
Fst. 1890
Purpose of Checklist.
i
P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
Wilson Residence
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant: Greg Quillen, PE, SE, CG Engineering
3. Address and phone number of ap licant and contact person:
CG Engineering, 250 4th Ave S, Suite 200, Edmonds 98020 - 425.778.8500
Owner: DJ Wilson, 425.361.2118
4. Date checklist prepared: November 18, 2009
5. Agency requesting checklist: City ofEdmonds
Page I of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dw4 19 2006
RECEIVED
NOV 2 0 2009
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR.
CITY OF EDMONDS
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Owner would prefer to start as soon as project is permitted and weather conditions allow.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. Possibly build a single family residence in the future.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 2 of 24
sepa checklist - handwtite.dm:4.19.2006
0
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Grading hermit is Dendina.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
To construct a retaining wall on the west side of two side -by -side parcels with return walls
on the north and south. Compacted fill would then be placed behind the retaining walls in
order to raise the grade to increase the usable area of the two parcels. Grading, layout of
the driveway and future house, and erosion control on the north parcel.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Location of the proposed project: 19205 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds 98020
The North 80 feet of the West 120 feet of Tract 84, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according
to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, Page 76, Records of said County.
Subject o easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 3 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Rolling, hilly, steep slope
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
15-25%
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Sandy clay loams
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Not to our knowledge.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 4 of 24
sepa checklist - handwHte.dm:4.19.2006
0 •
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
855 cubic yards of cut, 5 cubic yards of fill.
Will likely use material excavated from the site as fill.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion could occur. Appropriate measures and erosion control details are indicated
on the plans.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
An existing shed will remain, approximately 1 % of the total area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
BMPs for erosion control including but not limited to silt fences, hay bales will be
used to prevent sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer
system or suFface waters. Slope areas will be protected with plastic covering when
construction es not occurring for more than two days.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Some dust from grading equipment during construction. No changes after project is
complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 5 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 6 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite dor4 19 2006
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 7 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite dc,c-4 19 2006
0 •
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Runoff will be directed into an appropriately designed storm water disposal
system.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
BMPs including but not limited to silt fences. hay bales will be used to prevent
sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer system or surface
waters. Slope areas will be protected.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 8 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
X shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
X other types of vegetation:_ Berry vines
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Most vegetation will be removed when grading begins.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 9 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.192006
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
Grass seed will be spread after the project is complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
U.
Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
X birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 10 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite duc-4 19 2006
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page l l of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
•
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Construction equipment noise.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 12 of 24
sMa checklist - handwlite.dm:4.19.2006
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
On the short term, delivery trucks, grading equipment. Work will be completed
per the City of Edmond's work hour requirement.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction noise kept to a minimum during allowable day time hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Sinqle family residences.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 13 of 24
sepa checklist - handwriteAcc:4.19.2006
C. Describe any structures on the site.
No structures other than a small storage shed.
(STAFF
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
_Southwest County UGA; Incorporated City (Edmonds)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Unknown.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 14 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No.
j-
k.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Family dynamics will not change for this project.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 15 of 24
sepa checklist - handwdte.dccA.l9.2006
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 16 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite do 4 19 2006
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 17 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite dm-4 19 2006
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Less than a mile north to Hutt Park. Maplewood Park is 1 1/2 miles south of this
location.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 18 of 24
sepa checklist • handwrite doc•4 19 2006
0 •
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
The closest public street is Olympic View Drive which the property faces. The
proposed access to the existing street system will not change. See attached site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
0.30 miles to the nearest public transit stop.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
There may be some curb & gutter repairs.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 20 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
0
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
No change.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 21 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite dw4 19 2006
16. Utilities
a. Circle tilities currently available
sanitary sewe septic system, other:
at the site: a ectricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
No other utilities will be needed at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
make its decision.
Signature of Proponent
Page 22 of 24
Date Submitted
sepa checklist - handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
®. HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
l,r.�;,•,Lnri�rl 15nrurruf Crr�irrrcrirr,� • I-1}'�iro;.;r'nhr,;r • Ciru,'ni•irnurur'nrrr7 • Ir;:hrrrirnr c ]�•�firr,.
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 201.0-003-21 T100
DJ Wilson
19213 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Subject: Geotechnical Investigation and Recommendations Regarding the Grading Plan
for Earthwork. at 19205 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA
Dear Mr. Wilson,
As requested we have completed a geotechnical investigation in support of the grading work
planned on the above referenced property. This letter presents our findings.
BACKGROUND:
It is our understanding that you eventually plan to regrade the lot and build retaining walls and a
house. The plan is to start with the grading and then construct the house and retaining walls at a
later date. The grading plan was submitted to the City of Edmonds and sent back a request for
more information. Specifically, this area is in a geologic critical area due to the steep slope and
the City would like some discussion about the impact that a house and retaining wall would have
on this and surrounding lots, even though the current scope of work is only for grading. A copy
of their request is attached as Attaclunent 1.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
The purpose of this report is to address the geotechnical issues raised by the City in their request.
It is our understanding that there are no plans for the house and walls with the exception of a
rockery along the north property line. Our field investigation was designed to establish the
geologic conditions at the site such that we can address the issues regarding the impact a house
and retaining walls would have on this and neighboring sites. It was not conducted to make
foundation recommendations for either the house or the walls.
A vicinity map is shown in Figure 1 and a copy of the grading plan is shown in our Figure 2. We
probed three lines oriented and made two hand borings. We have prepared this letter based on
the field explorations, information in the literature, surface observations, and our experience in
the area.
anti o1��
5����rT
��FILE SUS.
FEB 112010
BUILDING DEPAFtl
CITY OF EDMONDENT
19730 - 64th Avenue W.
Suite 200
Lynnwood, WA 98036.5957
Tel: 425.774.0106
Pax: 425.774.2714
w«w.hwageo.coin
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:
Surface observations:
Two photographs of the site are shown on Figure 3. The eastern portion of the south side of the
lot has been landscaped as part of the yard for the house to the south. That includes plantings,
two retaining walls and a shed. The upper, eastern, portion of the site has been cleared. It
appears the clearing from that area has been piled on the central portion of the site and the
western portion of the site is covered with a thick blackberry cover. The site is relatively level
from north to south. There is a relatively steep bank above Olympic view Drive. The central
portion of the site is nearly level and the eastern portion of the site rises to the property line and
beyond. Based on the topography it appears the upper (eastern end) of the site has been cut, the
center part of the site has been leveled, and the lower (western end) of the site above Olympic
View Dr has been filled, although there is no verification of that.
Geologic Map:
The Geologic "DRAFT Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area" map by Booth, Cox,
Troost and Shimel dated January 4, 2004 is shown in Figure 4. Based on this map the site is well
within the boundaries of Qva or Advance Outwash. This material is generally granular and
glacially overridden hence very dense. On steep slopes it weathers relatively quickly to a
granular soil which typically stands on an angle of about 39 degrees. The formation is generally
permeable and not subject to deep seated landslides.
LIDAR:
A LIDAR image is shown on Figure 5. LIDAR is a technique of taking pictures with a wave
length that sees through coverings on the earth's surface leaving a good 3-D image of the ground
surface. Note that there are no signs of massive sliding in the area of the site.
Probing:
A pointed 3/8 inch diameter, 6 foot long steel rod with a T handle on top was used to probe the
area as shown on Figure 2. No attempt was made to probe in the areas covered with cut brush or
heavy blackberry vines. The depth of practical refusal is shown in red on the drawing. In
general, practical refusal was reached at 1.5 to 6 feet with an average of about 3 feet.
Borings:
Hand borings were advanced at 2 locations as shown on the site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2).
The boring logs are included as Figures 5 and 6. HH-1 was located near the center of the
property and encountered on the order of 3-1/2 to 4-1/2 feet of fill over weathered Advance
outwash. HH-2 was located near the upper (eastern end) of the lot and encountered'/2 foot of fill
Final Report 2-9-10 2 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
or topsoil over weathered Advance Outwash. Based on the borings, the depth to refusal of the .
probe was not a good indicator of the top of the Advance Outwash.
Subsurface Conditions:
Based on the above field observations and exploration it appears the upper part of the site has
been cut at some point in the past and the central and lower portions of the site have been filled.
Fill was probably uncontrolled and is a few feet thick. The parent material is Advance Outwash
which is weathered -in -the upper -few feet. There were no indications -of surface sloughing or
deep seated failures.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Slone stability:
No indication of slope sloughing or deep seated slope instability was observed. We believe the
parent materials encountered were Advance Outwash which is consistent with the geologic map.
Deep seated failures in Advance Outwash would not be expected unless it is located on weaker
soils and the go for the ride on a very large slide. We do not see any indication of that scenario
at this site. We do not foresee any negative impacts on this site or on any neighboring properties
from a geologic perspective. Drainage and erosion must be controlled.
Grading:
The steepest grading slopes appear to be 2H:1 V (2 Horizontal to 1 Vertical). All materials
encountered at the site, and we believe all materials on the site that are not highly organic, could
be cut or filled to this angle and remain stable. As long as surface water and erosion are
controlled, we do not foresee any negative impacts on this lot or neighboring properties from this
grading from a geologic perspective.
House:
A house foundation would be constructed in the weathered Advance Outwash soil and not in the
fill. The depth into the Advance Outwash soils was not determined but it is probably a few feet.
We do not foresee any reason a house could not be built on this site and we do not foresee the
house having any geologically unfavorable impacts on this lot or neighboring properties. Design
of the house foundations will require location specific foundation explorations and design
recommendations.
Retaining walls:
In our opinion, properly designed and constructed retaining walls could be constructed anywhere
on the lot without causing instability of adjacent properties. These walls will require location
Final Report 2-9-10 3 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
specific foundation explorations and recommendations. The type of wall which is most
applicable will depend on location, height and the foundation conditions at the location.
Wet weather construction:
The soils at this site may be relatively highly erodible depending upon what is encountered in the
cuts and what is used for fill. During the normal construction window, normal BMW's (covering
bare ground during wet weather, vegetating bare ground, etc.) should be used and should control
erosion.
CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for TJ Wilson and his design team for use in obtaining the permit
for the grading plan shown herein and addressing the issues brought up by the City of Edmonds
in the Attachment 1. Although walls and a house are discussed no explorations were done to
support those activities and no foundation design recommendations are presented herein.
This report should be provided in its entirety to prospective contractors; however, the
conclusions and interpretations presented herein should not be construed as a warranty of the
subsurface conditions. Experience shows that soil and ground water conditions can vary
significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions may occur between explorations that
may not be detected by a geotechnical study. If, during future site operations, subsurface
conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein, HWA should be
notified to review the recommendations made in this report, and revise, if necessary. If there is a
substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of construction, or if
conditions change due to construction operations, it is recommended that this report be reviewed
to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations considering the changed
conditions and time lapse.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or the
owners' representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations are brought to the
attention of the appropriate design team personnel and incorporated into the project plans and
specifications, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors
carry out such recommendations in the field.
We recommend HWA GeoSciences Inc. be retained to monitor construction, evaluate soil and
ground water conditions as they are exposed, and verify that subgrade preparation, backfilling,
and compaction are accomplished in accordance with the specifications.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, HWA attempted to execute these services
in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in the fields of
geotechnical engineering and engineering geology at the time the report was prepared. No
Final Report 2-9-10 4 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
warranty, express or implied, is made. The scope of our work did not include enviromnental
assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic
substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site.
This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the
contractor's operations, and cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel other than our own
on the site. As such, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor
should notify the owner if any_of the recommended actions presented herein are considered
unsafe. - - ----- - --- ----_
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service.
Sincerely,
HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
t�P►S C. �`��
M
„ems° w
I
V
Tom Kimsey, PhD, PE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
TK:TT:cf
Teddy Taddese, PhD
Engineering Geologist
Final Report 2-9-10 5 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
9
0
a - -W a 3 : I Mh St SW � ' � qb
.164th StSWi Q .• m;__. 5,,,�ti, q,;, #• �. `e ,' •1841h 51 SW IN
Perrinville
�I a # a 3 , Lynndale < 1661h St SW a ; 4 Alderwood�
Park !. fi ' - Q a �ynnwood ` S N�O �H • l
); H p M I .SV, F1 m 1 m < -•l Alderwooel Manor
y Puget 61' I J5241
^/ 13 .P 1981hStSW
e. Edmonds
/ 1524� z 2001h s1 sw - Community ` -� 20(th $t sw r Cedar Valley o
College a 202no St SW
• D` Daley st z - - Q Pine * •. zoatn St sw S • zoom St SW w A _ S H ,
104 HH '.Edmonds , ' : o Ridge t, I. I . m6 - �
' Park) Seattle'. ,
i' m • Dayton St -t M.•fln 51 ._ I _ HeiYostghts 20&h St SW �
a< 4 Naa st a Park ' s ��l W F i' m kard+ way
< 212tn st sw
way . f < 2141n Stsw sy Ri"'i D• 3*�:q,
Pine Si Ptne sl Pine St 2161h SI 51N • - • • - < 2/16th St SW
4, Fir $I • •- ?tA1h SI SW - / i� '� Q d . a
1 ] 1TSt wi .
�. 101 _Ehn sl___-22=31.SW.__ _ 2201h-S1.SW __<-220thstSw.� _ 22AM-StsW-_
- -- -- �o 3 3 a f' 7 222nd St sw;
< - < d < 5 Z2am sl sw 224th St $W ' 3 ^1 ` •O
a ; .1 * 22e1h s1 SW / 3 r.i a Y a' .. Brier
< s path s1 sw �
i r -� Cemlas� 1 Esperarue I r- as Mountlake, i s a 3 �
m z8
3ml sl aw' l°G` ' •Z oTerrece�
Q.3.+ 23ath St sW • ••;,'-•'• Ct 3:
/ - ; Firdale 236th St SW • : 231th St SW - :'. ! ;. a .. .
Woodway .,k 1a• - • , in�a ' n
r < a... 2ao1h S1 SW 1 r! a. n . a Abbey 1, Y
6 g9 3 •e a ° . 24151 St sw . Vlew aaa a1 6
242M 81 sw k 4 R7tt 4
.-........ N ,0 - St • 104� NE 2DYt1 SI` 104 NE 206th - McPlnerokrl�al ......
:..............&
"T, - I HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN I FIGURE NO.
DJ WILSON PROPERTY PROJECT NO.
19705 OLYMPIC VIEW DR 2010-003-21
EDMONDS, WA T100
0
0
1
�..ryi-...t-�... .e_ _e..-.p_.�-ff.-.- .t`�... •.y,: .<. N:. ,..may.. .+.y�G��
•Fr-��r-•--4•.c--►�_-.-ae---.4--_M4__.M;- .M- M-•-Ai.�__7s.. Yi d�
l ', I HWAGEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
s.
-its•'
J .
y?
yt
�
FM
cy.
e -- •''A AU
} i
A—A4 �'1'b5S °`s�Ct1011.
6.0 Rgf1l ill fCef a -iris! ;" (16- nrohp
Y. Appl-0%, C(Lear of hcap of tur
himhc--Wi1h'h4l1ur4ch4l'Id w.rsiV
��'� Tlcn�c 1�1�cklrc•r-rti• bu:sltit•s
Hxlld boring 41c-jonal iIIin
ill)p2�91111)iM�'#' 11►i`-pjrl,f}II
SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN
DJ WILSON PROPERTY
19705 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA
FIGURE NO.
2
PROJECT NO.
2010-003-21
T100
Looking east
Looking west
HWAGEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
PHOTOGRAPHS
FIGURE NO.
DJ WILSON PROPERTY
19705 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA
PROJECT
2010-003-21
T100
0 •
DRAFT
Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area
Central Puget Lowland, Washington
By Derek B. Booth, Brett F. Cox, Kathy G. Troost, and Scott A. Shimel
Seattle -Area Geologic Mapping Project (SGMP), University of Washington,
and the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Printed January 5, 2004
Scale 1:24,000
U "� HWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
GEOLOGIC MAP
WILSON PROPERTY LANDSCAPING
19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA
FIGURE NO.
2010-003-21
T100
• 0
UHWA GEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
LIDAR IMAGE
WILSON PROPERTY LANDSCAPING
19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA
FIGURE NO.
2010-003-21
T100
DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosciences Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION: t feet DATE STARTED: 2/4/2010
DRILLING METHOD: Hand Auger CASING ELEVATION t feet DATE COMPLETED: 2/4/2010
SAMPLING METHOD: Grab LOGGED BY: T. Taddese
LOCATION: See Figure 2
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
ix
U
Z
h
Fw-
0
Q. a-g
��u
W
a
DESCRIPTION
U))
0- 8
0
of
0
Loose, brown, silty, fine to medium SAND with scattered fine
to coarse gravel, moist. Rootlets. Plastic noted at about 0.6
feet.
(FILL)
S-1
0
SM- --Loose-to medium dense, light -brown, silty, -fine to coarse- OS-2
gravelly, fine to medium SAND, moist.
ML--------- (FILL)---------J
SM Stiff, brown, fine to medium sandy SILT to silty fine to medium
SAND with fine to coarse gravel, moist. Burnt wood noted.
(FILL)
0 S-3
SM Loose to Medium dense, olive brown to yellow brown, silty,
fine gravelly fine to medium SAND, wet. Scattered coarse
gravel noted — — O S-4
(FILLIWEATHEREDRDVANCE OUTWASH)
---- — — — — -----------
SM Medium dense, yellow brown rust mottled, slightly silty, fine to
medium SAND, moist to wet. O S-5
(WEATHERED ADVANCE OUTWASH)
Hand boringterminated at a depth of about 5.4 feet below
existing ground surface.
No ground water seepage was observed while conducting
hand boring operations.
0 20 40 60 80
Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit 1--0 Liquid Limit
Natural Water Content
NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specified location and on the date indicated
and therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations.
100
HAND HOLE:
1
DJ Wilson Residence HH-1
HmaosaENCES INC. Edmonds, Washington PAGE: 1 of 1
HANDHOL 2010.003.GPJ 219/10 PROJECT NO.: 2010-003 FIGURE: 6
d
F=-
a
w
0
DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosciences Inc.
SURFACE ELEVATION:
i feet
DATE STARTED: 2/4/2010
DRILLING METHOD: Hand Auger
CASING ELEVATION
t feet
DATE COMPLETED: 2/4/2010
SAMPLING METHOD: Grab
LOGGED BY: T. Taddese
LOCATION: See Figure 2
in
N
Lu
U
UW
U)
m
Q
to
W
Q
J
•
z
.0
U)
x 0 (0
a. m (n
W W
W
f-
Lu
...
x
a(L
DESCRIPTION
u1 v3
(L
O
(D
p
MIL
SM
SM
Loose, brown to dark brown, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT
with organics. Roots and rootlets were noted.
(FILL/TOPSOIL)
Loose to medium dense, yellow brown, slightly silty, fine to
medium SAND, moist. Scattered fine to coarse gravel. Roots
and rootlets noted.
(WEATHERED ADVANCE OUTWASH)_
SM
Medium dense, olive brown, slightly silty, fine to medium
SAND. Scattered fine to coarse gravel, moist
(ADVANCE OUTWASH)
0S1 .
0S2
Hand boring terminated at a depth of about 3.0 feet below
existing ground surface.
4 No ground water seepage was observed while conducting
hand boring operations.
5
6
7
8
9
10
NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specked location and on the date Indicated
and therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations therefore may not necessarily be indicative of other times and/or locations.
D 20
40
60
80
16o
Water Content(%)
Plastic Limit 1---0 Liquid Limit
Natural Water Content
Ia ■
—3
—4
—5
—7
—8
—9
—10
HAND HOLE:
` DJ Wilson Residence HH-2
1
IMGEOSCIENCES INC, Edmonds, Washington PAGE: 1 of 1
HANDHOL 2010-003.GPJ 2/9110 PROJECT NO.: 2010-003 FIGURE: 7
Attachment 1
Letter from City of Edmonds to Greg Guillen and Jared Underbrink dated
December 2, 2009
0 . 0
CITY OF EDMONDS • 121 5`h AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: 425.771.0220 • FAX: 425.771.0221 • WEB: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT: PLANNING • BUILDING
December 2, 2009
Greg Guillen and Jared Underbrink
grego@cgengineering.com
jaredu@cgengineering.com
RE: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS FOR PLAN CHECK # 2009-0793
GRADING PERMIT AT 19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
Gentlemen,
I have reviewed the above building permit application for the Planning Division. Before I can continue to
review the permit, however, the following information needs to be clarified:
1. Critical Areas: The critical area checklist associated with this project (CRA-2009-0088) indicated
the presence of steep slopes on the parcel. Please provide a geotechnical report prepared pursuant to
ECDC 23.40 and 23.80 (specifically, 23.80.050 — 23.80,070) describing the effect of the proposed
grading on the eastern and western slopes. Include a description of how the future retaining wall(s)
satisfy the requirements of ECDC 23.80.070.A.3. Also, indicate the impact of any future house on
the parcel taking into consideration the specific buffer and setback requirements of and 23.40.280 and
23.80.070.A.1.
2. SEPA: Question 11 on the associated environmental checklist states the purpose of the project is:
To construct a retaining wall on the west side of two side -by -side parcels with return walls on
the north and south. Compacted fill would then be placed behind the retaining walls in order
to raise the grade to increase the usable area of the two parcels. Grading, layout of the
driveway and future house, and erosion control on the north parcel.
The site plan submitted for the project only shows the northern parcel and does not indicate any
grading on the western edge of either parcel adjacent to Olympic View Drive with the exception of
the area around the proposed driveway area. Please confirm the scope of this project and make
appropriate updates as necessary to ensure all applicable materials (SEPA, site plan, etc.) are in
agreement.
3. Retaining Walls: Handout B62 summarizes the requirements for construction of retaining walls
(htti2://www.ci.edmonds wa us/Cit�Departments/EngrDeptB62-Retainin&_Wall pdf). Retaining
walls may be located in a setback area but may only be 3' tall in that instance. Wall height is
measured vertically from original grade to the highest point of the retaining wall supporting soil.
Shed: It appears that the shed on the southeast corner of the parcel encroaches the southern property
line. The shed will have to be removed or moved to comply with the RS-12 side and rear setback
requirements.
5. Height: As an reminder, keep in mind that building height is calculated from average original grade
according to ECDC 21.40.030. Any future structure at the subject site must use the pre -grading
elevations to determine building height.
Please submit three copies of your updated plans to a Development Services Permit Coordinator, Monday
through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:00 pm. If you have any questions, please contact me at (425) 771-0220.
Sin'
Mike Clugston, AICP
Planner
1
_k O F `E D y1 • •
O
N CITY OF EDMONDS
Fsr. 1 aC)o 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: (File No. BLD-2009-0793) Application for building permit to allow
approximately 860 cubic yards of grading at the subject site.
Proponent: Greg Guillen, CG Engineering
Location of proposal, including street address if any: Parcel addressed as 19205 Olympic View Drive
(Tax ID# 00434600008301). The site is approximately 400' south of 190th Place SW.
Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS
The City of Edmonds, acting as lead agency for this proposal, has determined that the proposed project
does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. This information is available
to the public on request.
This is not an approval of the proposed action, only a determination of the potential environmental impacts
of the proposal. The City of Edmonds has determined that the environmental impacts are adequately
addressed through the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Edmonds Community
Development Code governing land -use standards, construction, clearing, grading and stormwater control,
and critical areas. This determination is issued on the basis of compliance of the proposal with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and standards.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 21 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by March 15, 2010.
Project Planner: Mike Clugston, Planner
Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220
Date: February22, 2010 Signature: %�n� (W C14*VL
XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue
North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the
appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form
no later than March 15, 2010.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the
procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on March 1, 2010, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services
Building, and the Edmonds Post Office.
XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the
Checklist.
� FILE
SEPA DNS BLD-2009-0793.DOC Page 1 of2 STREE
2/23/10.SEPA
I
• Mailed SEPA Determination-fo properties within 300 feet of the site.
• Mailed SEPA Determination and the Environmental Checklist to the following:
XX Environmental Review Section
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47703
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
XX COMCAST
Outside Plant Engineer, North Region
410 Valley Ave NW #12
Puyallup, WA 98371-3317
XX Puget Sound Energy
Attn: Elaine Babby
PO Box 90868, M/S XRD-1 W
Bellevue, WA 98009
pc: File No. BLD-2009-0793
SEPA Notebook
XX Dean Saksena, Senior Manager
Snohomish Co. PUD
PO Box 1107
Everett, WA 98206-1107
XX Greg Guillen
CG Engineering
2504 thAve. S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
XX Jared Underbrink
CG Engineering
250 41h Ave. S, Suite 200
Edmonds, WA 98020
City of Edmonds Zoning Map, November 18, 2008
Page 2 of 2
SEPA DNS BLD-2009-0793.DOC
223/10.SEPA
OV EDo P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
MMMW
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
FSt. 1890
Purpose of Checklist.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
Wilson Residence
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant: Greg Quillen, PE, SE, CIS Engineering
3. Address and phone number of ap licant and contact person:
CG Engineering, 250 4th Ave S, Suite 200, Edmonds 98020 - 425.778.8500
Owner: DJ Wilson, 425.361.2118
4. Date checklist prepared: Nov 18, 2009; revised Feb 2 2010 Q11 per Review Comments
5. Agency requesting checklist: City o Edmonds CC
SUB
FEB 112010
Page 1 of 24 BUILDING DEPAR- MENT
sepa checklist - handwrite.doe:4.19.2006 cITY OF EDIMONDS
51
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Owner would prefer to start as soon as project is perm
(STAFF COMMENTS)
and weather conditions allow.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. Possibly build a single family residence in the future..
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 2 of 24
sepa checklist - handwtite.docA.19.2006
V.:
•
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Grading permit is pending.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
I.L . Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Regrading of the property and a short 3 foot high rockery along the north property line.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Location of the proposed project: 19205 Olympic View Drive, Edmonds 98020
The North 80 feet of the West 120 feet of Tract 84, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, according
to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, Page 76, Records of said County.
ZSubject to easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
sqm checklist - handwrite doc•4 19.2006
Page 3 of 24
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Rolling, hilly, steep slope
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?.
15-25%
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Sandv day loams
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. . Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Not to our knowledge.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 4 of 24
sqm checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
0 •
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
855 cubic yards of cut, 5 cubic yards of fill.
Will likely use material excavated from the site as fill.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion could occur. Appropriate measures and erosion control details are indicated
on the plans.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
An existing shed will remain, approximately 1 % of the total area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
BMPs for erosion control including but not limited to silt fences, hay bales will be
used to prevent sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer
system or su ace waters. Slope areas will be protected with plastic covering when
construction es not occurring for more than two days.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Some dust from grading equipment during construction. No changes after project is
complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS).
Page 5 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
0 0
9
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 6 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite dw-4 19.2006
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 7 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the.source of runoff (including storm water) and 'method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
Runoff will be directed into an appropriately de:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Ined storm water disposal
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
BMPs including but not limited to silt fences, hay bales will be used to prevent
sediment from leaving the site and entering storm water sewer system or surface
waters. Slope areas will be protected.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 8 of 24
a" checklist - handwrite doc-4 19 2006
4. Plants
Fr
Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
X shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
X other types of vegetation: Berry vines
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Most vegetation will be removed when grading begins.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 9 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.d«:4.19.2006
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
Grass seed will be spread after the project is complete.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
X birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbirds other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near, the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 10 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.I9.2006
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 11 of 24
ceps checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposu"re to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
Construction equipment noise.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 12 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
On the short term, delivery trucks, grading equipment. Work will be completed
per the City of Edmond's work hour requirement.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction noise kept to a minimum during allowable day time hours.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Single family residences.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 13 of 24
sepa checklist. handwrite.dm:4.19.2006
C. Describe any structures on the site.
No structures other than a small storage shed.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS) is
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? '
Southwest County UGA: Incorporated City (Edmonds)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Unknown.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 14 of 24
sepa checklist - hendwrite.dw:4.19.2006
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
j-
k.
Tel
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
Family dynamics will not change for this protect.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 15 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
0
9
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
Not applicable at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 16 of 24
sepa checklist . handwrite doc-4 19.2006
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Not applicable_
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 17 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Less than a mile north to Hutt Park. Maplewood Park is 1 1/2 miles south of this
location.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF
C. Proposed measures to 'reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 18 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.docA.19.2006
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
The closest public street is Olympic View Drive which the property faces. The
proposed access to the existing street system will not change. See attached site plan.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 19 of 24
sepa checklist- handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
• 0
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
0.30 miles to the nearest public transit stop.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
There may be some curb & gutter repairs.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 20 of 24
sepa checklist - handwriteAmA.19.2006
0
0
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
No change.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
Not applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Page 21 of 24
sepa checklist - handwtite.dm:4.19.2006
16. Utilities
a. Circle tilities currently available at the site: a ectricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone
sanitary sewe septic system, other:
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
No other utilities will be needed at this time.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
make its decision.
Signature of Proponent
I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to
Z —11-to
Date Submitted
5
ee-Vi ewe
Page 22 of 24
sepa checklist - handwrite.docA.19.2006
s 0
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Page 23 of 24
sepa checklist . handwrite doc-4 19 2006
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
i
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
Page 24 of 24
sepa checklist- handwrite.doc:4.19.2006
•
#P2
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
Attach this notarized declaration to the adjacent property owners list.
On my oath, I certify that the names and addresses provided represent all properties
located within 300 feet of the subject property.
— 4-11� 14�jj�
Si nat a Ap licant or Applicant's Representative
Subscribed and sworn to before me this MA day of A18 Mhe► - , M0
q w K+ /tayvaa o-)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at 6daw d's L A
NOt ox, I Notary public
>ItOlra o a elngton >it01� or Washington
A AP
AUSEN *OWN K GEVESHAUSEN
MyAPPONNmeDOC Ze, ZOl 1 MYAppaltifter,r Expires Dec 28, 2011
4/21 /2009
page 3
ZCZ11v0
&0v 2 0 1"
DEV c0PMENT ,s6.;j
of E0,:10NDsS crti
Aso
I
ISO
Removable ID Labels
® www.avery.com
AVERY@ 646OTM
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600
1-800-GO-AVERY
00425100000400
00425100000700
0434600006006
FREDRICK E & JERETTA GRAHAM
MIKE HARLINE
ROBERT IGUCHI
19316 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE
19210 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19230 94TH PL W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020.
00434600006008
00434600006102
00434600006104
KEVIN J & ELAINE MCDONALD
MYLO & MARION F CHARLSTON
WLFB INVESTMENTS LLC
19218 94TH AVE W
19110 94TH PL W
19125 94TH AVE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
00434600006105
00434600006201
00434600008002
WLFB INVESTMENTS LLC
PAT NIELSEN
ROBERT B & PATRICIA A GOULD
19125 94TH AVE W
9500190TH ST SW
75 PINE ST UNIT 106
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
00434600008102
00434600008301
00434600008302
SCOTT & ELIZABETH LANGE
DONALD J & KARIANNA M WILSON
ROBERT E & SHIRLEY M WILSON
19121 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19213 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19209 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
00434600008303
00434600008401
00434600008402 l
BETHLYN J WHITNEY
KEVIN J MCDONALD
LUAN & SYLVIA BERISHA
19211 OLYYMPIC VIEW DR
19218 94TH AVE W
19223 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
00434600008502
27031300407600
27031300407700 i
RANDY S PREVIS
MAEVE J CONNOLLY
WILLIAM N THORNBURGH
19305 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
9608 CHERRY STREET
19106 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020
27031300412500
27031300407500
00434600008101
JOHN & MARIE MALDAZYS
BONNIE L PIEST
SCOTT NEWCOM
19130 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
9610 CHERRY ST
19117 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2336
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2559
00434600008200
00434600008201
27031300407800
JOSEPH & ELISABETH BACSO
CHARLES W & PATRICE C RAPLEE
MICHAELJ SIEP
19129 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19125 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19128 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2559
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2559
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2559
00425100000500
00425100000600
00434600008304
DANIEL J & PAMELA J HARKINS
AIRDRIE ANNE THOMSEN
KARIANNA M & DONALD J WILSON
19226 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19222 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19213 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2560
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2560
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2560
00434600008501
00434600008503
00425100000100
ROBERT L BOEHLKE
WAYNE & ROBERTA WALLACE
JOHN & JANET BEAUDREAU
19301 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
19303 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
1542 10TH PL N
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2561
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2561
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2630
Aa3AV-09-008-I.
009LS 3WdW31®IlaaAb asD
wi09b9 OA21MV
worAJane•AA Mn ®
slagel QI algenowaa
Removable ID Labels www.avery.com AVERY@ 6460T-
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 1-800-GO-AVERY S i
27031300407400 00434600006002 634600006004
ANTHONY SAVAGE WALTER C SELLERS MARILYN N CARLSON
1561 10T" PL N 19212 94T" AVE W 19204 94T" AVE W
EDMONDS, WA 98020-2630 EDMONDS, WA 98026 EDMONDS, WA 98026
00434600008001
RUSSELL CLINGINGSMITH
19105 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS, WA 98026
A113AV-09-008-L @09LS 3MdW31 ekanv asD
wi09V9 0A?J3AV ® wog i(aane•AAMM sla9el al ?I9enowaa
OWNER
CONSULTANTS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BENCHMARK
DJ & KARIANNA WILSON
CIVIL ENGINEER
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
SURVEYOR
THE NORTH 80 FEET OF THE WEST 120 FEET OF TRACT 84, EDMONDS
INVERT OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
CG ENGINEERING
CG ENGINEERING
LOVELL 'SAUERLAND & ASSOCIATES, INC
SEA VIEW TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN
85 FEET SOUTH AND 15 FEET WEST OF
EDMONDS, WA 98020
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
19400 33RD AVE W, SUITE 200
VOLUME 3 OF PLATS, PAGE 76, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY.
THE SOUTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER
425.361.2118
CONTACT: DJ W ILSON
EDMONDS, WA 98020
425.778.8500 FAX 778.5536
EDMONDS, WA 98020
425.778.8500 FAX 778.5536
LYNNWOOD, WA 98036
425.775.1591 425.672.7998
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF
ELEVATION: 135.24
CONTACT• JA= UNDERBRINK
CONTACT- JOE GALUSHA
RECORD.
DATUM
NAVD 88
SHEET INDEX
C1.1 COVER SHEET .& GENERAL NOTES
C2,1 SITE PLAN &. DETAILS
190n1 Sr sw
s�v
t PUGET DRIVE MAY ALSO BE USED AS A HAUL
- - - - PREFERRED HAUL ROUTE ROUTE, BUT IS NOT PREFERRED BY THE CITY
OF EDMONDS.
2. SOLO DUMP TRUCKS WILL BE USED.
3. FOLLOW SR-104 EAST TO HWY 99 OR 1-5
GENERAL NOTES
VICINITY MAP
1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS 23. SLOPE OF FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE CONSTANT BETWEEN FINISHED CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS
STANDARD PLANS AND DETAILS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES, AND ALL OTHER SHOWN.
APPLICABLE LOCAL MUNICIPAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS:
- CURRENT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 24. FINISHED GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS AT MINIMUM 5% SLOPE FOR A MINIMUM
- 2008 WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION DISTANCE OF 10 FEET.
-. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY STORMWAIER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE 25. CONTRACTOR SHAM BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN SHORING AND BRACING
PUGET SOUND BASIN (CURRENT EDITION) AS NECESSARY TO PROTECT WORKERS, EXISTING BUILDINGS, STREETS, WALKWAYS, UTILITIES AND OTHER
2. NOT USED. EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND EXCAVATIONS AGAINST LOSS OF GROUND OR CAVING
EMBANKMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF SHORING AND BRACING, AS
3. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOBSITE WHENEVER . CONSTRUCTION IS. IN REQUIRED.
PROGRESS.
26. NOT USED.
4. DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND THE LOCAL
GOVERNING AUTHORITY. 27. COORDINATE AND ARRANGE FOR ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS, UTILITY RELOCATIONS AND/OR SERVICE
INTERRUPTIONS WITH THE AFFECTED OWNERS AND APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. CONNECTIONS TO
5. CONTRACTOR SMALL RECORD ALL APPROVED DEVIATIONS FROM THESE PLANS ON A SET OF "AS -BUILT' EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE MADE ONLY WITH THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE AUTHORITIES GOVERNING
_ DRAWINGS AND SHALL SUMMARIZE ALL AS BUILT CONDITIONS ON ONE SET OF REPRODUCIBLE DRAWINGS SAID UTILITIES AND WITH 2 WEEKS ADVANCE NOTICE.
FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE OWNER PRIOR PROJECT COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE. A SET OF AS -BUILT 28. EXISTING UTILITY LINES IN SERVICE WHICH ARE DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE
DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING REPAIRED AT CON'`r�
OCCUPANCY. ACTOR'S EXPENSE AND INSPECTED AND .ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS AND
�,
OWNER'S REPS-^ .• ITATIVE PRIOR TO BACKFILI ING.
6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ;ARE IN, _FEET. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION.
29. NEW UTILITY LOC ',IONS ARE GENERALLY SHOWN BY DIMENSION, WHERE NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED,
7.' THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SHOWN HEREON HAVE BEEN FURNISHED BY LOCATIONS MAY Fr SCALED FROM DRAWINGS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S
OTHERS BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE REPRESENTATIVE.
CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF,
THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL U11UTY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND . TO 30. WHERE NEW PIPE CLEARS AN EXISTING OR NEW UTILITY BY 6" OR LESS, PLACE POLYETHYLENE PLASTIC
FURTHER DISCOVER AND PROTECT ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED FOAM AS A CUSHION BETWEEN THE UTILITIES. .
BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, SIZE, TYPE AND
CONDITION OF EXISTING UTILITY LINES AT CONNECTION OR CROSSING POINTS BEFORE TRENCHING FOR 31. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR CONTINUATION OF SITE UTILITIES WITHIN THE
NEW UTILITIES, CG ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF BUILDING.
THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES PRESENTED ON THESE DRAWINGS.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL CONTACT 32. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL WORK.
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATION SERVICE (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO 33. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS (WHERE APPLICABLE) FOR SITE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
CONSTRUCTION.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE PROJECT SITE BEFORE STARTING
WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.
.10. PIPE LENGTHS WHERE SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY CHANGE DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (WHERE APPLICABLE) AND SHALL
THOROUGHLY FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE CONTENTS THEREOF. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED
IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT.
12. STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.
AIM
p4'� ew
13. NOT USED.. �4 1 s
14. SEE SURVEY AND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF BUILDINGS, CITY OF EDiVI®IVDS
LANDSCAPED AREAS AND OTHER PROPOSED OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES.
HIS PROJECT:
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR TWORK
15. NOT USED. 1) Excavation, grading, & site. preparation �� �' -
2 9 Soil bearing verification ADDL( i2
16. ALL REQUIRED STORMWATER FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO 3) Placement of fill & compaction OWNER (, t^ --
INSTALLATION OF. ANY PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 4) Footing drain
5) Temporary Erosion Control AIi0V1t'` L� �'Z2'(b
17. ALLROOF DRAINS, PERIMETER FOUNDATION DRAINS, CATCH BASINS AND OTHER EXTERNAL DRAINS SHAM 6) Final Erosion Control BLDG. OFF)C.,
BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 7) Site retaining wall/rockery construction.
8) General site monitoring E1 �D 3' MUROE �M
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL SIZE 9) Final letter from geotechnical engineer of recordC�qo���
..
IMPROVEMENTS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS.
19. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ON AND OFF SITE SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE.
EQUIVALENT OF THOR PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROPRIATE. REQUIREMENTS
AND STANDARDS.
20. ALL DISTURBED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED OR STABILIZED BY OTHER ACCEPTABLE METHODS FOR SUBMIT ALL SPECIAL INS
THE PREVENTION OF ON -SITE EROSION AFTER THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. SEE EROSION
. LEGEND
DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING
PROPOSED
I
;
ABBREVIA110NS
- - ---
--- - -
ABN
ABANDONED
MJ
MECHANICAL JOINT
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
- -
- -
BLDG
BUILDING
MON
MONUMENT
CENTERLINE
-
-
BOW
BOTTOM OF WALL
NTS
NOT TO SCALE
CLEARING LIMITS
CENTERLINE
OC
ON CENTER
SEDIMENT BARRIER
X X
CB
CATCH BASIN
PC
POINT OF CURVATURE
CONTOUR LINE.
- - - - -100- = - - -
^ �"`.
CMP
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
PI
POINT OF INTERSECTION
FENCE,-
SANITARY SEWER LINE
CO
CLEANOUT
PIV
POST INDICATOR VALVE
- - _SS_ - _SS_
-----SSD-SS _...:
CONC
CONCRETE
R
PROPERTY LINE
MANHOLE7.
0
CONST
CONSTRUCTION
PT
POINT OF . TA14GENCY
STORM DRAIN MAIN
- -' -SD- .= -SD-
- -SD. 30---_SD-
CU YD
CUBIC YARD
PVC
POINT OF VERTICAL CURVE
STORM DRAIN PIPE
DDCVA
DOUBLE DETECTOR CIAECK
VALVE ASSEMBLY
PVI
POINT OF VERTICAL
INTERSECTION .
ROOF DRAIN
- - - R - - - R - = - R -
R R
DIA
DIAMETER
PVMT
PAVEMENT
FOOTING DRAIN
- - -F - - - F- = - F -
F IF .
DIP.
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
PVT .
POINT OF VERTICAL TANG.
PRESSURE LINE
- - - P_ = - P - - - P -
P P
EA
EACH
R
RADIUS
CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1)
M
EJ
EXPANSION JOINT
RFINF
REINFORCEMENT
CATCH BASIN (TYPE 2)
❑�
Q
ELEV
ELEVATION _
RJ
RESTRAINED JOINT
CLEANOUT
0
o
EOP
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
RET
RETAINING
CLEANOUT AND WYE
EX
EXISTING '
RT
RIGHT
GRADE BREAK
- - - - - - -
- - -. - - - -
FDC
FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION
SD
STORM DRAIN
SURFACE SWALE
FFE
FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION
SECT .
SECTION
DRAINAGE ARROW
-
FH
FIRE HYDRANT
SDMH
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
WATER LINE
- - WA - -. - WA
WA WA
FIL
FLANGE
SIM
SIMILAR
WATER METER
®
®.
FT
FEET/FOOT
SQ
SQUARE
FIRE HYDRANT
GV
GATE VALVE
SS
SANITARY SEWER
FDG
HP
HIGH POINT
SSMH
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
PIV
o .
® _I
HT
HEIGHT
STA
STATION
GATE VALVE
g
Z
ID
INSIDE DIAMETER
STD
STANDARD
TEE.
90' BEND
IE
INVERT ELEVATION
STL._
STEEL
,T
,1
L
LENGTH/LINE
1B
THRUST BLOCK
THRUST BLOCKING
o
A
LF
LINEAL FOOT
TOC
TOP OF CURB
CAP
CONCRETE_ PAVEMENT
LP
LOW POINT
TOW
TOP OF WALL
LT
LEFT
TOP
TOP ELEVATION
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
CRUSHED SURFACING
r.
+.
__,
MAX
MAXIMUM
TV
TYPICAL
MECH
MECHANICAL
VC
VERTICAL CURVE
ROCKERY
i
MH
MANHOLE
W/
WITH
SPOT ELEVATION
20.0
.�
20.0
f I
MIN
MINIMUM
WM
WATER METER
TELEPHONE LINE
- - - T - - -.T.. - - T -
_. T T
POWER LINE
--- E-.--E- - -E-
E E
GAS LINE
c=- - c- _ G_
- _ _ -
G G i
SIGN
nj
CONTROL PLANS FOR SPECIFIC GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 'REPORTS. TO CITY BU.LLDING �e��
INSPECTOR ON A WEEKLY BASIS o oads Building Dept 3 z5�0
21. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF ! Y i` u.• - �� -
PEET F1
THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL Applicant shall repalr/replace all damage to
i
AI'I'�QL,��� ED AS NOTED utilities or -frontage Irnprov�,ments in City jq
22. THIS PROJECT IS NOT A BALANCED EARTHWORK PROJECT. BOTH EXPORT AND. IMPORT OF SOIL AND SYNGlNEERING right-of-way per City sianc:� dQ that Is caused
ROCK MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED. mom-, during the permitted project.
�„ cx ciccurn d I
I ?; v ._
REE
RIGHT -OP -WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MAR 0 3 2010
DINNT
G INSPECTION REQUIRE) cOEDMONDS
S
THESE. -PLANS HAVE BEENTREPARED FOR AGENCY: REVIEW AND ARESUBJECT 0 T ..CHANGE. DO NOT. USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BIDDING PURPOSES .WITHOUT SIGNED AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL- BEFORE YOU- - - DIG 1 800 424 5555.
6N G INIEE. RING
250 4TH AVE. S., SUITE 200
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020
PHONE (425) 778-8500
FAX (425) 778-5536
0
MM
1=mww
w
w
w
w
o
CL
CL
CL
rn
o
0
w
o
\
o
0
Y
DESIGN:
DRAWN:
CHECK:
JOB NO:
DATE:
JPU
ZOS
GAG
09150.20
11 /04/09
LL!
LL'
O
Z
O
w
W
O
W
0
00
F_
�-
zUcnw0
LLJ
W
z
O
Lr)
Z
LJJ
Lj
V�
J
N
:2
0
W.
S
�
.-
Q
w
U
0
�
SHEET:
E 3 EAST, W.M.SE 1 4 SE 1 .4SECTI
ON 13) TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANG LIMIT ALL GRADING ACTIVITIES TO THE SUBJECT
f PROPERTY AS IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED GRADING
PLAN, PAYING PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LINE OF rcNGINF.F. ING
I 1 I SHRUBS NEAR THE NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY:.
I
., SUITE 200250 4AVE.S
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020G\AD(NG QUANTITIES
I I I I ' PHONE (425) 778-8500 co 778-5536TOTAL EXCAVATION (CUT) 855 CU. YDS.3MAX HEIGHT ROCKERY FAX (425)
TOTAL EMBANKMENT (FILL) - 5 CU. YDS. i i , ' N 8 915 ,2 3 " (so't LONG). ROCKERY
W SUPPORTS A CUT SLOPE .120.00 6g
860CU.YDS.
TOTAL /
THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ABOVE ARE FOR THE PERMIT
PRO
CESS ONLY. THESE VALUES ARE APPROXIMATE. DO NOT I I o c �� O o o I c b O o o� o i /�� /; I i i -j i
BIDDING PAYMENT, O. . I �� I i
USE FOR R ESTIMATINGPURPOSESI ,'
0.22 AC - - �. � �
SITE AREA
cn
I �j
y � I 1 * Qvc I � / 1 � / /� /� � i CONSTRUC��IyyON
Aso \ (� i �° E L I \ 1 11 ,1 I ENTRANCE 1
ACCEPTABLE TIGHTLINE Q
-c�
MATERIAL Io
SDR 35 I I /1 i 11 I 11 I E�RTABLE FORA
SCH 40 I d I / 1 1 1 I 1 r r THIS SLOPE IS ACC
H -12 CD � Q // 1 1 1 I CONSTRUCTION ENTRANgE BUT A DRIVEWAY \ \ \ ,� \
F810. HANCC I � I INSTALL lE,�uIPORARY I I I I WAIVER HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED TO 0
1 1 i \ \ i C t I O
I I � SE IMENT TRAP F R I 1 ALLOW FOR 18% DRIVEWAI� SLOPE.
EX CATC I BASIN 1 1 \ \\ C" $ I 00 I i5�
5r r I. I
i , i 1 I I _ r I I \ \ 1 1 4NAL
0 i i r i III 2.1146
_ I- 1 1` ROCKERY
6 Q C O I I `%3, OC
i co
p l r `n i i Q CO I I LJJ .
I oI x, r r I I I TR A,C T
00 � I i z I 00 / d co cn o i
Q i �' FILIE UBRIC' co
FENCE/ I i i REMOVE WIRE FENCE 1 I I I 1. .
� I �' I
utni I. O
o. I I I I I /
ROAD __'��" END I I I `�
`}�s I I I I I I I I LANDSCAPE PLANTER TO
WORK �� �g ROAD WORK (; I i I I I I . BE R MOVEo ,
AHEAD �� � I T I o0 1 I I I _ v v I 1 Z
1 I _ \ ` CLEARING/GRADING
�� I I I I I I - v ¢
� / - LIMITS �•--
��� ' I , I I I II 1
y I I I xl I I 1 / I r
FT. O m cn cn
I I I i I I I I 1 1 r
W00 I=�ww
(n 3 I� I I I 1 I I 1 1 I ` [L (n L� W
��{F ��tkergY REMOVE CONC BLOCK
I 11 WALL AS NEEDED FT. CE
.�$ I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I ON',
I I 1 1 I I 1. W w w w
I. I L I I FENCE o�� cL
IIr I I 1 i 1 1 1 i O O D E N \ I / O a
�.
o I y I I 1 1 , I I X STAIRSy. 0
EX TRI COUNTY M M
3 I N I L i I I I CONC. WALK co o M
oN O REBAR AT CORNER
I I I I N 8 9 15 3 W ;. 12 �0 . c F;
11 ,
E• I Y
� � N IY
I i i
RMAR I AT'I ORNER I a
EAST LIME OF DESIGN: JPU
,I I I W. 120 FT. DRAWN: ZOS
f3`�€��► LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION Q , I 1 I
ENTRANCE, CONNECTION TO I U) I I � , / ........._.._......__._.'
...�:.
STORM SYSTEM. w I CHECK: GAG
i
I ��
w I �, w I , o Edmonds Building pa JOB NO: 09150.20
OWNERICOIJT`aC'iCTR IS RE, PONSIBLE
< a I I Owl
I rr�n rnnn� wl ninhi-r0ni Am nAkAAf.'.� n r, r , �.� F1 it @# ► � I T1; T DATE: 1 �04�0
3 t
z
o 5' MIN, RADIUS r
9�P QUARRY SPALLS i' FILTER SOCK WITH L d n
�/ /
SOP 2-4' MIN DIA OVER FLOW HOLES
J_
8'712' MIN. DEPTH 'tol
_
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN
r
ff]NTINOJS ROLLS, USE STAPLES
PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN LR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH • u
4 THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FABRIC TO WIRE.
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE, .
CATCH BASIN W
�ra o WIRE MESH SUPPORT FE E
zY A rkh� TO SUPPORT FILTER FA IC. 9�'1 grN,'yh LLJ La
v
a i c'Pc`O'f'�jfr� a• U 00 .
�"�u
#3 �''.o ftTmsr�'tSfR.'k.4d.
Y[. `POUF fT0
STRAW BALES MAY BE USED IN iL
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES (SEE .�
-
' „r r N `MATEFUAL 8' TO 12+
�� d - O L • :�, DETAIL E11.1). THIS APPLICAITON 0 ,�►.
'qt PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/ SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL
r II EGRESS AREA TIMES DURING CONSTRUCITON
PERIOD. � O
,�� ' I e ` 2• X 2' WOOD POSTS OR
GI� EWUIVALENT CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIW ENTRANCE G�
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. Z
CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE
STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSION CONTROL. O O Li
k CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL EROSION CONTRO N
CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON ALL MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. CITY INSPECTION REQUIRED ON AL1L EROSION CONTROL J
ERISD]N CONTROL METHODS BEFORE MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN. Q �S
s +s OTIER W�tK CAN BEGIN.
h ' (/�•'h�,h/r`•y:�.�.'�/y,{J . •�•.'�'�'ti S`.. � e-
t ., ',. �. •.� '"�" � i,�i: - - - . 't.' t . • 4 • 4�. •'�./, I'T .•1 �:/„•,�•Y I'V 7 ,
i :-+*'h`; I' •t REVISIONS TAN DAR(DETAIL
�E'•�Y' .. f.. •; I •`J, Q''' R STANDARD
��• laf,�8/o3 .SHEET.
��K � �� �����., �,��� ••ti • STANDARD D ETAI L
p x STANDARD DETAIL, TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS
E FILTRATION SYSTEMS D. GEBERr loi6/os STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
a �EeERT o /19/os
� ILTER FABRC FENCE
K , DATE » "°. E1.2 �890-1990 D ERT 0"Kr/o5/o6 a►a saus NTS E1.3
ai„ e s t ROAD f 7/24/01 NTS 7/24/Olig
l
ova xuc wo. E1.1 890-199mom
END �z�F WORK 1890-199� 7/24/il NTS
ROAD WORK AHEAD
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP RESU
FABRIC FENCE_ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2ol
FILTER 4 5 SCALE: NTS MAR 0. 3 2010
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 3 SCALE: NTS SCALE. NTs
^ — 0� ElU01-TY OF EDMON S T
SCALE: 1 -- 2 T EET FILE'
GE. DO NOT CONSTRUCTION
OR BIDDING PURPOSES WITHOUT SIGNED
AGENCY APPROVAL STAMP. CALL BEFORE. YOU DIG 1-800-424,5555.
THESE PLANS HAVE
BEENLPREPARED FOR -AGENCY REVIEW AND ARE —SUBJECT TO CHAN USE FO
R