Loading...
19308 94TH AVE W.PDF1111.1111 lill 9197 19308 94TH AVE W CITY OF EDMONDS �V/NEW 1-1 ADDITION 1:1 RETIREMENT REET. FILE ASSET INFORMATION SHEET ASSET NO. ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION Wak�c SuN �ce- L me, SERIAL NO. LOCATION 1 lHt-b- DEPT NO (09-5 1 * * PURCHASE ORDER NO. PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. IZ ESTIMATED LIFE 0-5 I *PROJECTNUMBER wqlslly PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST-2�3M7 INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY �2 /DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT 40 G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE DATE INITIAL kvp) DEPARTMENT FILE VCRIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO, ITY of E D M 0 N DS �--P'E R,M I T C S I D E S EW E R' For Inspection Call 771 PERMIT NO. aNEET FILE Address of I Construction: 1013ca q4 '-'4 MWE Property Legal Description (Include all'easements): L:;e /V%7',-, C�) Owner and/or Builder: A-, e--, H 0 P, IJ E_k) 7-1-= Z Pk 5E NC_ Contractor & License�No: EC? AAQ _Z /a (_7' Single Family Residence L 0 N D�S "E' T P I LTREALTMENT PLANT Multi -Family (No. of Units Commercial (No; of fixture Units Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No V /.Yes (If Yes,,Right-of-Way Construction Permit required. Call One -Call -Center (1-800-424-5555) before any excavation.) Cross other Private Froperty: Ko Yes (If Yes,.easeme'nt required, attach legal description and county easement number.) PLEASE READ THE ITEMS -1-S-T E D THE BACK RECEIVED AUG 15 1989 I cer ify that I h and shall comply Date dve r ff !e , with the items listed on the back. PUBLIC WORKS 1 A, Permit Fee: "Issued By: Trunk Charge: Date Issued: Assessment Fee: Receipt No. Partial Inspection: i Comments Initial Final Inspection Approved: Na- t �e Initial 00 Rejected: CD -T—nitial Reason Date Ln PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE Wh.ite Copy File Green Copy —Inspector Buff Copy Applicant NOTICE: --ty .-a. -.-. . No--w-ar-ran on the attached The -information shown Hed for use by the City Of map(s) was com ' P' Edmonds,; its Employees and Consultants. Th,e City of 'Edm.onds does. not . warrant the accuracyof anything set for.th on these m a p ('s"-). A n . y person or entity -requesting a copyshould conduct an.independent ormation shown, o inquiry regarding the inf lmlted to _tFe -map(s)/ including, but not I er stub shown. Suc the lo�,ation of any sew -not exist and may sewer stubs may or may or may not exist at the location shown Neitheir t1he City of Edmon'(JS nori ts thE M 0-y e e.5 0 r o ffi -c e -r s s. h. a I- I b e 1--i a. If-j,-1..e f o r t information given on this Map(5), nor for Ided based entation prov any one repres upon'said map(s). r,j 1 1 The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F� LID NO - ------------------ - AsmT. NO - ------------------ OWNER------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTOR G- ' G ' CL --------- v'J -,S " % . ..................... PERMIT NO. JOB ADDRESS -19.3-bl ---- - ---- ql-� 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - -------------------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------ --- --- --- --- - ------------------------------------------------ PWW-0001 -11/75 (REV. 11/78) I Q (� L� NE: - \K� - NAME OF ADDITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t> 1�0�LANT pLANT Le A ATME Lv Pve- CAD Approved: DATE ............. B)e-� ---- ------------------------------------------- STREET FILE (OTfpI ERICHO. TIETZE AND AssocIATES, INC. Engineers and Consultants 144 Railroad Avenue Edmonds, WA 98020 206-771-6212 (� \6,- \ .0- V I C�, -� ') , 3 'A V V, 0 P, " c e- R (E�-U I c- e--V-- f -2 R k-� r, E I V/ E D APR 2 4 19 1'39- -r �, e ew o ,D;, A, Roo clec-Ls s1z -WALI---s 73 b R I Ua- - /07,q SIZ rO TA (- 6-0 � 5- S /Z V ot� �U c- At--Q'O peg Z;r or - is 0 1 02 6- c r-- 0 a- 5z3y -S/-- A ro -zx- c- U 0 L- 0 2- S- C F f-3 U S -71, t- 1� 0 it" 0 (3 0 L Z 71 F)j 5-4'- 1 - fTr 4 Ct= V 0 U i IV ca PIX 7- -Z 1-( X 1, 5- -+- 2 6 11)( 2 z I I x 2, 21 /,4. -/ t4A ; 4-4 cj= ro r)�-L- srop-A6a 5- Aqo.� C 0 ire, M-N- I � 1, k cis ,!iAL N CIA GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 13-954N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite I& Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 STREET FIL E 64�'91# Du I L,-,M, #0 APR 19 1989 April 17, 1989 JN 89127 Howard Schroeder Drawer Z Lynnwood, Washington 98046 Subject: Addendum Number One Slope Instability Risk Statement Schroeder Single -Family Residence 19308 - 94th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Schroeder: In our judgment, the plans which we have reviewed generally conform to the recommendations in the geotechnical report and the risk of damage to the proposed development or to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the report. Minimal risk does not imply no risk but rather that the risk is low as there is always some risk involved with construction on, or close to, a slope. If there are any questions, service, please contact us. MKD: cw d or if we can be of further Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. z5. S Mark K. Dodds, P.E. senior Engineer GEOTECH APR 14 RM CONSULTANTS 133% N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite I G pEwIT COURTM Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 (206) 343-7959 ST-REET _ILE Howard Schroeder Drawer Z Lynnwood, Washington 98046 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Schroeder Single -Family Residence 19308 - 94th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Schroeder: April 12, 1989 JN 89127 We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for your residence to be constructed at 19308 - 94th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our work was to e . xplore site conditions and provide earthwork and foundation design criteria. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with four test pits. We found the site to be underlain by one to six feet organic and medium -dense silty gravelly sandy fill soils. Below these fill soils all test pits encountered dense to very dense glacial till. It is our opinion that the structure can be designed with conventional foundations bearing on this till soils. Some over -excavation on the downslope side of the structure may be required, depending on the design of the structure. The attached report contains a more detailed discussion of the study and recommendations. If there are any questions, or if we can be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Engineer GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY SCHROEDER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 19308 - 94TH AVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This report represents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed single-family residence in Edmonds, Washington. The site is located at 19308 - 94th Avenue West. The general location of the site is illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. Based on preliminary plans furnished to us, we anticipate that the building will consist of a daylight rambler with an overhanging deck. Development of the property is in the design and planning stage. The site plan given to us included the footprint of the proposed structure and provided topographic information. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE The site is a rectangular lot which lies atop a bluff in Edmonds, Washington. There are two large trees on the flat portion of the lot next to 94th Avenue West. The rest of the property was either grassy or had had the brush cleared at the time of our fieldwork. No obvious fill piles or substantial debris were noted from surface observations. K0tMQ__z4 The subsurface conditions were explored by four test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was determined based upon the proposed construction, site topography, the required design criteria, subsurface conditions revealed during excavation, the scope of work outlined in our proposal, and time and budget constraints. The test -pits were excavated on April 6, 1989 with a rubber - tired backhoe owned and operated by Evans Brothers Excavating. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soils were collected from the backhoe bucket. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder JN 89127 April 12, 1989 Page 3 FOUNDATIONS The proposed structure may be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on the dense to very dense ' glacial till soils underlying the topsoil. Overexcavation of soil below the footing may be required depending on final site grades. Fill placed under footings should extend outwards from the edge of the footings at least a distance equal to the depth of fill underneath the footings. Exterior footings should be bottomed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent outside finish grade. Footings founded on competent native till soils should be designed for an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand (2000) pounds per square foot (psf). Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of twelve (12) and eighteen (18) inches, respectively. A one- third increase in the above bearing pressures may be used when considering short term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that total settlement of footings founded on glacial till soils be about one-half inch. Almost all settlement due to dead loads from the building structure should occur during construction. The deck may be founded on drilled piers socketed into the glacial till. we recommend a minimum embedment of sixteen - inch diameter drilled piers into the till of five feet. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the (bearing soils or compacted fill subgrade), or by passive earth pressure on the foundations. For the latter— the foundations must be either be poured "neat" against the existing soil or the wall backfill must be compacted structural fill. A coefficient of friction of 0.45 may be used between the structural foundation concrete and the supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of undisturbed till native soils and well compacted fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a fluid having a density of four hundred (400) pounds per cubit foot (pcf). Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed competent native soils or on structural fill. The slab should also be provided with a minimum of four (4) inches of free draining sand or gravel. In areas where moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane should be placed beneath the slab. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder April 12, 1989 FOUNDATION WALLS JN 89127 Page 4 Foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these structures. The following recommendations are for walls less than twelve feet high which restrain level backfill. If higher walls are desired, or if the backfill is sloping uphill, then we will need to be given the wall dimensions and slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, such as is the case in basement walls, at -rest earth pressure conditions are met and the walls should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure with a unit weight of sixty (60) pcf. Cantilevered walls or walls that can deflect at least an amount equal ' to .002 times the height of the wall can be designed for an equivalent act ' ive fluid pressure coefficient of 35 pcf. For calculating the base resistance to sliding, we recommend using a passive pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid having a density of four hundred (400) pcf and a coefficient of friction of 0.45. These values assume that no hydrostatic pressures act behind the wall and that no surcharge slopes or loads will be placed abovethe walls. if these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Foundation walls should be backfilled with compacted free - draining granular soils containing no organics. The wall backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay and no particles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Alternatively, a geotextile drainage product such as Miradrain or Enkadrain may be used. The purpose of the backfill requirements is to assure that the design criteria for the retaining wall is not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top foot to eighteen inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of all footings and earth retaining walls. Roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. The footing drains should be surrounded by at least six inches of one -inch -minus washed rock. The rock should be wrapped with non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar materials). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder April 12, 1989 JN 89127 Page 5 of the footing and/or crawl space and it should be sloped for drainage. A typical footing drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 5. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. During constructio ' n, loose surfaces should be sealed at niqht by compacting the surface soils to reduce the infiltration of rain into the soils. The slopes should be covered with plastic. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should be sloped at least two percent away from the building, except where the area adjacent to the building is paved. No groundwater was observed during our field work. However, seepage into the planned excavation is possible, and if encountered, the water should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe or French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at*the bottom of the excavation. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES In no case should excavation slopes be steeper or greater than the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts up to a height of four feet deep in unsaturated soils may be made vertical. For slopes having a height greater than four (4) feet, the cut should have an inclination no steeper than 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) from the top of the slope to the bottom of the excavation. It should be noted that the sands do cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cut slopes into native dense soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes also should not exceed 2:1 (H:V). Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. SITE PREPARATION AND GENERAL EARTHWORK We recommend that the building and pavement areas be stripped and cleared of all surface vegetation, all organic matter, and any other deleterious material. Stripped materials should be removed from the site or, if desired, stockpiled for later use GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder JN 89127 April 12, 1989 Page 6 in landscaping. The stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. structural fill is defined as any fill placed under buildings, pavements, walkways, or other areas where the underlying soils need to support loads. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should observe site conditions prior to fill placement. The surficial site soils are moisture -sensitive and can become very soft when wet and disturbed. Structural fill under floor slabs should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to a density equal to or greater than 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks and behind retaining walls should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type, compaction equipment and the number of passes made to compact the lift. In no case should the lifts exceed twelve (12) inches in loose thickness. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular soil having no more than 5 percent material passing the No. 200 sieve. The percentage of particles passing the 200 sieve should be measured on that portion of the soil passing the three-quarter inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in the report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soils encountered in the test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions of the site. During construction, if subsurface conditions are found which are significantly different from those observed in the test pits, or assumed to exist in the excavations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder April 12, 1989 JN 89127 . Page 7 This report has been prepared for specific application to this pr03ect and for the exclusive use of Howard Schroeder and his representatives. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recom- mendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for considera- tion in design. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. ADDITIONAL SERVICES It is recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design and specifications to verify that -the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and project specifications. It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and founda- tion construction activities comply with the intent of con- tract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. The following plates are attached and complete this report: Plate I Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plates 3 & 4 Test Pit Logs GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder JN 89127 April 12, 1989 Page 2 and obtained representative samples of the soils encountered. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 and 4. The subsurface conditions of the site generally con- sisted of medium -dense silty sandy fill soils lying atop glacial till. The following table presents the test pit number and the depth to dense till soils: TEST PIT NUMBER DEPTH TO TILL (FEET) 1 3.5 2 6.0 3 2.5 4 3.0 The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretative descriptions based on the conditions observed during the excavation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL The project appears feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The dense to very dense till soils will provide suitable bearing for the single-family residence. Foundation elements, both conventional continuous and spread footings, and drilled piers for the deck, will need to extend through the surficial soil and fills to the till. It is our opinion that the underlying glacial till is very stable and that there is a very low risk of instability involving the house. Drainage design is always very important when developing property on a slope. We recommend footing drains at the base of all footings. In addition, roof and surface water from impermeable surfaces should be collected into a tight -line drain. These drains should discharge into a storm drain, if one is available, or at the base of the slope; or in a manner as not to increase the concentration of water that normally flows over the slope. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Howard Schroeder JN 89127 April 12, 1989 Page 8 Plate 5 Footing Drain Detail Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. b of , ee ex:% a 6 Of Mark K. Dodds, P.E. Senior Geologist J$�% -STE% X, * 0 0*..6-00 %b*A L James R. Finley, Jr. P.E. Principal Attachments MKD/JRF:cw GEOTECH CONSULTANTS VICINITY MAP SCHROEDER RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No. Dote., p/al 8 APRIL 89 N.T.S. 1 1 71 N 'k%'00 TEST PIT I 4' 0 .\ t 267± uscs Description 0 Organic Topsoil, roots SM: Brown gravelly silty SAND, very moist, medium dense (FILL) fill, siltier lenses 5 S Brown gravelly silty SAND, very moist, medium dense to dense becomes dense to very dense (TILL) Test Pit terminated at 8 feet below existing grade. 10 No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 TEST PIT 2 10 Elevotion-267± uscs Description 0 H1 tnn.-,m I Brown gravelly silty SAND, very moist, medium dense M: ML- Dark brown sandy SILT to silty SAND with some gravel, 5 ISM wood, roots Brown gravelly silty SAND, moist, dense with some cobbles SM: and boulders, dense to very dense (TILL) 10 Test Pit terminated at 912 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. 15 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS A TEST PIT LOGS SCHROEDER RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON dob No.: D04te/..6/89 Logoed BY: pm� 89127 1 I MD 3 j w m 4-0 ILL", 2-110 2.55 216 LEGEND TP-2 12 APIPROMAM TEST PIT LOCATION 0 DECK OJERHANGS GEOTECH CONSULTANTS a 250 TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN 19308 - 94th AVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON sco If Note: 11 — 101 J. /NoD 8*90 12 7 1 0Av Pf*R: I L 19 8 9 1 1 7- 2 '00 0 5 E 15 Is SO & 4�' 0 uscs SM uscs TEST PIT 3 Ele Vgfioft � 75± Description Orgnni r tnp qnj 1 Br6wn gravblly silty SAND, medium to coarse grained, moist, loose to medium dense (FILL) Cray gravelly silty SAND, moist, dense to very dense Test Pit terminated at 5 feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. TEST PIT Description M Elevation, 279± ,-Brown gravelly silty SAND, very moist, loose Gray gravelly silty SAND, moist, medium dense SM wood encountered at 2' becomes dense at 3' 5 very dense OR 15 Test Pit terminated at 6-2- feet below existing grade. No groundwater seepage encountered during excavation. - A GEOTECH CONSULTANTS TEST PIT LOGS SCHROEDER RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON dob No., oote. Logged By: Plote 89127 1 4/6/89 1 MD 1 4 S/Ope bockfill ow0y from foundation. BACKFILL See text for requh,ements. WASHED ROCK 6 �7. NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 11 TIGHTLINE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to foofh7q droin. VAPOR BARRIER SLAB I I 4 "Min. x FREE - DRAINING SANDI GRA VEL 4"PERFoRArED HARD Pvc PIPE Invert at least as low as foo/Mg andlor crawl space. Slope to draln. Place weepholes downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL SCHROEDER RESIDENCE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Job No., Dote: /a 189129 4/6/89 77 N.T.S. I p5t': STRE.ET_F1_L..,,',1.: FILE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal, Construction of.a now single family.residence Proponent Howard Schroeder Location of proposal, including street address, if any 19308 94th Ave. W. Lead agency Edmonds Planning Division The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a prob� able significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the'public on request. 2E/- There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Responsible official Richard Schipanski Position/title Code Enforcement Technician -Phone 771-3202 Address 250 5th Ave. N.. Edmonds, WA 98020 Date April 12, 1989 Signature .[X-7 You may appeal this determination of nonsignificance to Hearing Examiner at 250 5th Ave. N., Edmonds, WA 98020 no later than 5:00 P.M. April 24, 1989 by filing a written appeal siting reasons You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rich Schipanski to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. /L7 There is no agency appeal. STREET FILE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purposc of Checklist: *k -- -- ek, 10PAI, '41h# W The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RC\\', require-, all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from theproposal, if it can be done) and to help the a-cncy decide whether an EIS is required. Z! instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic Information about your proposal. Governmental agen- cies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, oi give the best de- scription you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you real]v do not know the ans-wer, or if a I question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know. or "does not ap- ply". Complete answers to the questions no\,%, may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental rieguLions, such as zoning', shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental acencies can assist vou. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional in- formation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use ofchecklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN AD- DITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer." and "affected geographic area," respectively. A.BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project. if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: 4,3-wk-fZ b 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (5 qz -7?:::, -2 .;, G -7 Y 14 tl LJ L) 0 1> I WA , 99-6 C—C;, 6, A,;-e�w I ?, 57- 7 C, — eE. IV i�7 - 5j��oF7771,(�,c LLJ A qel 25- 4. Date checklist prepared: S. Agency requesting checklist: (f t -1—/,/ 0 1�1 0 a E> -5 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): lyktpell 0,:::77. /f.C7 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. A10 LL). 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared. or will be prepared, direct]), related to this proposal. 9. Do vou know whether applications are pending for governmental approv'als of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal' If yes, explain. N) o I W. List any government 'approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific infor- mation on project description.) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your pro- posed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What general types of soils arc found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note anv prime farmland. '54k, PY L-0 At --A d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so. describe. c. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading pro- posed.. Indicate source of fifi. 0 A/ S I T_ E: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction. or use'? If so. generaliv describe. M 0 g. About i what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any: 'J5 P471 0 0 �5 ky �A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors. industrial wood smokc) during construction and when the project is completed? If anv. acnerallv describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off —site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. . N 0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: EVALUATION FOR AGENCN' USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N 1) 0 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, Iif any: 6. Enerav and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural -as, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet L_ the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manu- facturing, etc. A 5� 14 -r-1 A/ C--- (T L 1-5 e 7-1c) b. Would VOUT project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally i1scribe. tv D c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: / A/ !� Ut- /+-7-/ OA) 7. Em-ironmental Health a. Are there an), environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. &/ 6 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? IV 0 IV I--;:' 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. C 0 AJ S -T- I-C L,) C_ 7-1 OfIJ - _S F� 0 /�_ 7- _1715- rZ 1%-k A- oi .5-p r--k —6— TO III: COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: I ) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including vear—round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it no\,\,s into., P cl C_ r-- -r 0 ') P-/ 1> t M I L-1-- 2) Will the project require any work over, In, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. IV 0 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. In- dicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general de- scription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. t&.) Ar -0/F-:- 44- 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100—year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. V 0 6) Does the proposal involve an), discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. �/C' 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. IV 6 P'J 1�7 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Water Runoff (including storm water): # 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and metho d of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 5*7-0 5- E: W LS- rz- -TV 12 /�i- IV 7-/ t. >-4-i N 14-c--C 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: () F:.- T�� r 10 &/ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen treev Pine, other shrubs crass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 7 - e c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been'observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: .................................. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: .......... Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -5- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise Impacts, if any: # 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the Site and adjacent properties? 17, :E!- -, ( Y2 t��t4 .-ri /.-." L_ b. Has the site been used'for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? k\) 0 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? P F_:z N f. What is the current comprehensive plan des], -nation of the site? ZAI:�s t 1> f5"&(­t- i A i i ­�_ o o c�� g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (3ArC_(< i . Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace'? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: —7— TO BL COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. Housing 0 a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low—Incomc housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, Or low—income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not Including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? UN01;EfZ -)-5' Fr, b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. Liaht and Clare a. What type of light or glare %&,III the proposal produce' What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the Finished project be a safely hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. �Jv EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY to iir COMPLI-TED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, inclucllni� recreation op- portunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for, national. state, or local preser- vation registers �nown to be on or next to the site? If so. generally describe. N b. GeneralIv describe any landmarks or evideric e of historic, archaeolo!zical. scientific, or cultural importance known to be, on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public stretts and highways serving the site. and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site �Jans. if any. c7 �4 1,/ b. Is site cur i rently served by public transit? If not. what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop" c., How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate'? J�; 0 d. Will the proposal require anv new roads or streets. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including drive%vays" If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). MA e * . Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vlclnitv 00 water. rail. or air transporta- tion' If so, generally describe. /V 0 f. How many vehicular.Lrips per day would be gencrated by the completed project? If .0 known. Indicate when peak volumes %%' uld occur. 01 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation 'Impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: firc pro- tection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N L) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. CirQ1c_uii I ies I electricitv natural ga I't* _CmLusenth, available at the site:(iED <�� (e=fuseserv- ice eleph3on,,4anitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 4, 1 o F 4-73 OV E C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ..... ......... . .. ....................................... Date Submitted: ........ ?:- / _Z­ .............................. _10— TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Rezones, Code Changes, Annexati ons, etc.). (do not use this sheet for project actions) 'Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the.types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? 0 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, Fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Z�. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or ar- eas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wil- 0 1 derricss, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultura sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? _11— TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT . EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: # 6. How would the proposal be like]) to increase demands on transportation or public ser- vices and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. —12r- 11 hop,-- I Lit =,-;.a i �MA 1 11 1;.i 11 4W r i I I f" ze 5 0 10 �YV JFA4 M IN. Tip. t\' 'tk 0 4MUMPA". . A 's 'F' ! JV Vivit 1H - Mov, A/1 14 7= U e IM L A� lei UJH. r PO A6 4Z �_P I L 7 .777-4 0, q, _�T AL-i�IWA' 10 -Oe-_O*Hg�� IEW WA-M-O.'. 4X* *r. -rye 01 wdeew�f ..AHP. *A%OVUP MAI F��­' A E�,�j r DRAWING INDEX.. MAI I"I Fli4fn'd F-L 76, kt MA I !I F L r-Z T6 0011 I � _T:� nl� i i if H f �T. A-nC14 R-A I­J j=LO0r;?_. F r-gAIiiiii W. �J F L-CoFz F�_A F� F PCo F F�ZA �A I Q C4 PI-Aa 14 v V A--n i6 I)ESCRIPTION Y t) M�%IAa� LEGAL W �\A IL X The legal description has beien amended to read as -follows: A111 that portion of Lot 60;,EXCEPT the north'3S6.00 feet thereof, in Edmonds Sea,�Iiew Tracts, according to the plat.thereof recorded in VoliNe,3 of Plats- page 76, in Snohomish County, Washington, described As follows. 'A&iim4 imi v%" ft4- 4-1-- -4-U-4. -0 T '�4Lr 14 Cly V. F0 T A 2_71,� r"Y L — F_ 2 4—tT f' 2-7 ACT U P\ L L I f JE-_ cr) 1C 'j.) L)L D C\l QD Z z W �� 1�1 I f) 2 ?_�' L \/"/ I 275- 77o 7,5 2 v r 2_76,97, y r A X X V -E LG I ) 7' I P�T TO -r, /i A I t_— I::- -T U A I I 1--- 1"" Z6 0 I TR I � :_W_1 WAI%ft� _Aff�� - R-r WMA a