19309 OLYMPIC VIEW DR (3).pdfI r
i
�a
1
4
tiPHRo
VET
mAa
A t
4f '
CITY OF EDMONDS
BOARD OF ADJUST*ENT
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
APPLICANT C.4124. MUA/,
,
DATE 9-aL4 -7/
FEE
RECT
APO'S
HEARING DATE: /b , 1 %-' 7—
ADDRESS /9509 04 YeW1'1C 4�E!V O2.
CITY & ZIP c />' AIQA/05 gggOZQ PHONE 77$ A4;E 551co
INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY �E6 SiMfLE
11 LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY /4/3O9 6ZYA�J/w7/C YXEFPV 0*2.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 7R/16
W5
ro • WJR1 J.VC4
VARIANCE REQUESTED: Fr
roT,4L rw1ja7h .�, 2 W0- U�� ,A�✓Li.�" �l yr :�. ��
�'/sd VR.r� ci✓�[..2_ v -+. 2-O � -ed,o-2N-�� i � /c fS i �d . �oaTrC ,¢..� �iGQ1f�
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
USE ZONE:
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:
STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss.
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
Signature of Applicant, Owner, or
Representative
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared i4 /[i'454a
who, being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared
and read the attached statements and has acknowledged to me that the recititations
contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and
voluntary act and deed for the purposes thereinentioned.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2.5 day of 5� ►, 19 T�
r
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
DrCLAR=T10,4 OF APPLICAN"
Please answer all questions
1. What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape
of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to
development of your property?
L A// 0 T// DF /cw
l5"F77 X c'C4!FSS .410
W ^O- eeG *44
X Aoe& L
UT/L /Ty C.4S�4
89 FT, 19c1T
M
�. How does your property differ from other property in the sake
vicinity?
T•ti/G= P.2�.a�/?T/ /'EG>�/l?�S � /SFT. �4CG'E.SS �J�!/�r LJ7'/L/T�
-SEi�JE/v i' 'To XCC &SS
3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to
other property or improvements in the vicinity?
/ to , TyOS kIyIel4lVC6 COG'E2S' T/fC EX/ST/416 DI?11/47Gl/IgZ
i0o y/4 /s 4sE� •=o e .�ccss , r rr�E /gP 575e" rT 711)0�76r
L4P
4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted?'
Will these hardships have been caused by your own action?
Pll� Off'
*O�j
14:2OR Tip
5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance?
i
,1
Record of Ftna1n 5 vT ro..w %F.F mr--• - -- ---
The Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of 2AJ=wwa��
File No. (`- - . request for variance at / q 36cl
the following:
nts and Affidavits attesting to same
1. That notice was given according to Code requireme
are in the file.
Z. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met.
3. In addition that
f the request for variance 1s ranted, subject to the following special
4. Thereore
conditions:
E
�`
4
j
permit is not obtained
w w w w
permit and/or occupancy
5. Section 12.16.110 if a building p and void.---"
he su ect property. within one year from the date of the
lla Board's decision, the con-
•#orr L^
t ditional use permit or variance shall be automatically nu
6. Decision shall be effective on:
DATA
y
Date of Application:=l ----
Date of Publication: 1 0 _4-,7711J--
Date of Posting:
Date of Appeal from Decision f the Board:_
rman ,
Date of Nearing:
:
Continuances
VIED
ustmen
,
0
ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS Is PLANNERS
324 Mein Street • Edmonds, Washington 98020 • Telephone (206) 775.3434
September 26, 1979
File No. 79-185
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR CARL MUNSON
PARCEL A BEFORE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
The north 84 feet of the west 135 feet of Tract 86, Edmonds Sea View Tracts,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76,
records of Snohomish County, Washington;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
PARCEL B BEFORE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Tract
86,
Edmonds
Sea View
Tracts,
according to
the plat
thereof recorded in
Volume
3
of Plats,
page
76,
records
of Snohomish
County,
Washington;
EXCEPT the south 43 feet thereof; and
EXCEPT the north 84 feet of the west 135 feet thereof,
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
PARCEL A AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT.
The north 89 feet of the west 165 feet of Tract 86, Edmonds Sea View Tracts,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records
of Snohomish County, Washington;
SUBJECT TO an easement for ingress and egress, and for the installation,
operation and maintenance of utilities over, under, across, through and upon
the south 15 feet of the north 89 feet of the west 165 feet of said Tract 86;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
PARCEL B AFTER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
Tract
86,
Edmonds
Sea View
Tracts,
according to
the plat
thereof
recorded in
Volume
3
of Plats,
page
76,
records
of Snohomish
County,
Washington;
EXCEPT the south 43 feet thereof; and
EXCEPT the north 89 feet of the west 165 feet thereof;
TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress, and for the installation,
operation and maintenance of utilities over, under, across, through and upon
the south 15 feet of the north 89 feet of the west 165 feet of said Tract 86,
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
i
Qi ��JE WASHY y0,� y '
• O
•. ReBiste�e .•• �,
/�ryAL'LAIP
Sri
1
ill, p
- '^ n :� r en-• •r z ;r DgFi'!tXN' i .... t '
.'n Y t ,YrI,Y F s
t
1
N00/9007 <rr /s?'
a9 � f-fiR 48
..... '..+p.. n. ._: to
25'.P. Y.
41
Q I
V I tk 1,
It
F
f,, /O~C60A.P
T W w r I
TO F E REA 'AOJUSTEO / �1 �`
Xh +
N •L9'z7"
74
' I i QD QO
ro,�=
f
�h Z ` �p V� tat
�4, IN N
WK I
i
JTEPJ I •� I m i •''�
il
it;Pi
coNC.IIJ
1p
O �fe ;a►afl�r�s N r� ;
L — c7 9•a' 43' '
Y 1
Q ZIL
i -_I L11 gd0'PUT n1
. - E.1'HT.'.NSAf/ALj,ReYt6tiNT ,! _ ,
�
'']��-:— Lam•: g9S.SS'fY.OT ��')'�—' _ _
OL Y/1�1/0/C 111E lilt DRO OL YMo/C �JI/E.
,
M
J
0
gtiz
� 'i W yetrwrr�,� .ays ,•�`Q'?oo
141)
K O Rt .Z Off~ A .
�' s ;Q:
`-- '..e•.r•' lh
pt'Af. l t, `:,,
,r
? (
VICIN/TY MAP
L or L /ME AD✓US TMEMT
FOR
CARL � EL IZA,BE TH A#IU1V50/V
/M S.E. //4 5.E. %4 5EC. 1A T. Z 7M. , R. 5E.. wR,
Joa•d000lQtiGd. %KC.EES
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
324 Main Street Edmonds, Washington 98020
DATE 9-25 79
FILE NO.
79-1Q5
EHBLT / OF /
.P.S, F'B'474IZI
L.S. IBCALE /'ofO
�a _ � � � : . � ',i :'.
_ ,., '-. .._... ,. ', ..:�-.in.,.. .,��.:. .. _ ...,,... . .... .... .......�. ...:. •. .. .. _ ... _ .. .. ... ... ... ... ., i.✓, r:7 it "llF+'; ''.
�:_ . ,
T
� NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
,,�
FOR VARIANCE - �ap�gq�x�EClglcpc
;,
BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT u:
��.
All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the
17th day of October 1g 79 ,has been set as the
date for hearing petition fi 1 ed by Carl Munson
for avariance - � ,'��;��� from required lot
width
at 193�9 Olympic View Drive
kt},
�,�'.
,,� .
��,
�::
said property being zoned RS-li �;�'
am��$ga��xakl�xa�xi� f �� .
. , ,i:;
,,,
,.::
�;`
i fi;..
i. 4Q,`
l ,`,
� �,`
. ,� .
i�!:
' � Y� �. .
�. b�.
�. ' r. !: .
�:���
r�. .
�.(:!.
'_ `'
Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
::
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment �`
and all interested persons are invited to appear.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
i F' t!
FILE N0: V-75-79 i' .
�;
1'
PUBLISH: 10-4-79 � .
�t �
M
..
_�
M
_
_ _.._.
.. x�r�.��
..�
1
_
n. .. era.
��.v -^..
.a+
..
.. .. ..
.�.�..
� .^..'.:.
....n....
`�..
L
'
..
yd
a
1
STATE OF WAGHINGTON, u
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH,
i
1
4
Affidavit of Publication
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says
that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news-
paper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snoho-
mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper '
of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper
has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of Snohomish County, and that the notice ....................................
NOTICE OF HEARINC�........................................:............... ...................._..._ '
.... ....
_.... .......................... .. ... ..... ..........._ --••-
.......... ..........................................:................................._...............
.
`s
a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said.
newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and
entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely:
i
OCTOBER 49 1979
................. ...............
.......................................................................... ................
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
............................. _
Principal Clerk
I
5th E
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ...........1............
OCTOBER 79
day of 19 �. ..
No ublic in and for the State ofWashington,
red at Everett,. Snohomish County,
i
I
a
................
FILE NO. V-75-79
APPLICANT Carl Munson �e
`j AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
Us.
j COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
Richard Pearson being first duly sworn,
3 ('
on oath deposes and says:
That on the aj r9 day of the
attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by Ordinance,
and in any event; in the Post Office and Civic Center, and where applic-
able, on or near the subject property*
is
i
Signed
, t
,
{
Subscribed and sworn to before me thisday of j
k
F
19
Notar Public in and for Jhe State of
Washington residing at
A
i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
I`.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
q
ADjo4kiest r
&S* moos *Sao 0
rl
AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FORVariew tieeaa4aaaom.
o� �00� ®•A
1.4 • • • . .�� I• ... . . . . . .
,a .
800*6068 Sees*
® O
A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS:. �.7.�• • • • • �•
. , iV 8w, .. r%(ire640*6900606090
.
ZONE CLASSIFICATION :..... a a 1• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • " .
i
TIME & DATE OF HEARING. ..7. �..0.%�•• • • • •10�7r�
TIME DAY DATE
r
THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC
CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET. - ANY PERSON. INTERESTED IN THIS
I PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT, COMMENTS
CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE
MEETING, IN. PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHONE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE
EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC
HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME
TIME AND PLACE.
FILE NO. .o.®7043h`.' .......... PUBLISHED. i0."'.7".°.'rP:.g.... .
The removal, mutilation, destruction, or
concealment of this notice prior to the date
WARNING! of the hearing is a misdemeanor punishable
by fine and imprisonment.
r;'47
Y"F `Li FAA „ .`dm (, j *A' r!���A jr� P, 4�j�+�1 [�j" 1��N7 F,';
t
i
NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
F•0R VARIANCE - IC9IDU9W=
BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
i
i.
j All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the
21st day of November 19 79 , has been set as the
date for hearing petition filed by Carl Munson
for a vari ance from required lot, ,.
easementp and pavement width ±
1
at 19309 O1 is View Drive
I
said property being zoned RS-12
t
aRak g�3c�gx f�edtx=fG M: i
9 .Ys t
44
e
t i
j I
Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M: in the Council Chambers of the
IF
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment
and all interested persons are invited to appear.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
City Clerk, City of Edmonds
FILE N0: V-75-79
PUBLISH: 11-10-79
r
U d I d:I.h'k^uKQ3i'.G ....-. r
!r:4vxla Vq= IV mz: v r.In ' ' ...
,..r,.,.-..,.M.-..T-+,wp,w,nw�.,c�txa...«OS,r�Y,u•.AW.i.a.•...�i:'Tr,.t;, a..r.. �'.4v'{���St SJL
r
i
i
1
i STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH )
FILE NO. Ve 1507°I
APPL I CANT t/✓I uM s a�
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER
being first duly sworn,
on oath deposes and says:
O hC day of Nw ,19�, the
That on the
attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed'by Ordinance,
Post Office and Civic Center, and where appiic-
and in any event, in the
able, on or near the subject property.
Signed
Subscribed
and sworn to before me this�day of
C
19�•
i
"
,
h
L.
f04
I
t:
�
t
r
r
t
4t�
t
N6tar/Public in and for the State of 4
Washington residing at
i
I
i
,
I
i
y
.,w
f
0 ..I
CITY OF EDMONDS
i
WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING
THE
19 7q a ON THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION:
PROPERTY ADDRESS AND LOCATION
ZONE DISTRICT
THE HEARING WILL BEGIN AT e eM. , IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER, 250 FIFTH AVENA NORTH.
IF YOU WISH TO COMMENT ON THIS PROPOSAL, YOU MAY COME TO THE HEARING AND SPEAK, YOU
MAY ALSO WRITE A LETTER STATING YOUR VIEWS WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING,
PLEASE ADDRESS THE LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND INCLUDE THE
ABOVE FILE NUMBER.
IF THE ITEM IS CONTINUED TO ANOTHER HEARING BECAUSE THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED, OR
FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, THE DATE OF THE CONTINUED HEARING WILL BE ANNOUNCED
ONLY AT THE MEETING.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
505 BELL STREET, EDMONDS (PHONE 775-2525, EXTe 227)e
THE REMOVAL, MUTILATION, DESTRUCTION, OR
CONCEALMENT OF THIS NOTICE BEFORE THE DATE
WARNlr4%7■ OF THE HEARING IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE
BY FINE AND IMPRISONMENT.
THIS NOTICE MAY BE REMOVED AFTER
■
STATE OF WASHINOTON,
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH,
8-2-1
Affidavit of Publication
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says
that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news=
paper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snoho-
mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper
of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper
has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of Snohomish County, and that the notice .........................:..........
NOTICE Or HEARING
.......... ............................:.............. ......................
...... f
rs i
........................................................
............
a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said
newspaper proper and not. in supplement form, in the regular and
entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely:
NOV. 109 1979
.................................................................................................. ......
•................................
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period
.............................................
............................................................. Principal Clerk
13th t.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this .......
NOVEMBER 79
day of 19.........
IYI(
... ... •-
ta Public in and for the State of Washington;
si g at Everett, Snohomish County.
... ..... ... .,.,. ,.... ... ..�... ... .. i.c,,.
., ..,� .......... _.
CITY OF E®i\/lONDS
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 9E020 • (206) 775-2525
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HARVE H. HARRISON
MAYOR
DATE: November 16, 1979 »}`
T0: Carl Munson14,
19309 Olympic View Drive i t'
Edmonds, WA 98020 ; n;
j '
1 it' '
TRANSMITTING: PLANNER'S REVIEW FORM AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION
FOR BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING 11-21-79
RE: V-75-79 ..
AS YOU REQUESTED:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION: XX
AS WE DISCUSSED.
FOR APPROVAL:
FOR YOUR FILE:
REVIEW AND COMMENT:
COM14ENT AND RETURN.
MINUTES OF MEETING:
REMARKS: CC: Reid -Middleton v
40
324 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
PLANNING DIVISION
I
i
I
}
i.
f.
z,
Ms
®=
t
i
PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM FILE
APPLICANT: YAWASor
ADDRESS: Ig309 C)t*w Djc, UteVV ��. LUNlIVG: KS-Iz
VARIANCE REQUESTED: ti Ytdukce_ \ot wig'l0 7 Z) rc.duct eas•+�+e•++
_4me l 5' 3) red Kcp., emx4Lvv1tovA w i d li^. imn I s ,
ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT: L) So' _.> ' 9>
OTHER PERTINENT FACTS: uo_riaw�ca wow\d a\few Ion ►ihe �1,jNs�-wA4 J, so mat Mh#6IJ
lob 8) will Inawe_ /5' access eas�cme.,i- c�.wrenf wid,k5') . 8ofh /it
Will 141p, tareme"t Jifr Access
VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100
1. Does this amount to a rezone? /1%0
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or circumstances not generally applicable to other
lands in the same district? ,•r,F dQ sell &vV%ki6 164d .yidm%g it±a Ji
6
�r
r i t� r, M.DttiSe.
(b) oul stric enforcement of the zoning code deprive the. property owner of' rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? W616 Dt ►a f a�ow
use J: +4Ae- vtq
3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applicant? L*F w,0df1^
A*wd beboe�v*i4 6Y14i V%O%A1U
Nee A
-.
4. Are there unnecessary hardships and practical difficulties in carrying out the
provisions of the zoning code? Gof- ,g ca4otV�a4- JV, LV24 C/
V O,0ri &m ae g e wee r-ty a� i A .+ oG �,rc k,[o� `w f be tia t c c-� +tiGw cliff-�' wew cu.b u c� ,G
0/f'h Il' v f b k t Z- G r/ v�iwac %f u.#o r r i v a i
50 1pilh l Ae granting ofii:h.e variance be detrimental two the heath, safety, or welfare
of property owners in the vicinity? )Vo -
6. Is this the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of land?
7. Will the granting of the variance generally be -in harmony and compatible with this
zoning code? Ves
Rem
A-f p r-o ga l .
Planner's Variance Review 12/77
,
CITY OF E®MON08
awc LINTER . 60MONGS, WAS►YNGTON 98M • (M) »saws
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE* December 19, 1979
TO ; . Mr. Carl Munson
19309 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, WA 98020
TRANSMITTING: Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
RE: -='4=7549
AS YOU REQUESTED :
FOR YOUR INFORMATION,:xx
AS WE DISCUSSED:
FOR APPROVAL:
FOR YOUR FILE:
REVIEW AND , COMMENT:
COMMENT AND RETURN:
MINUTES OF MEETING: November 21, 1979
i
t
1
i
i
REMARKS: CC: Mr. Brian Seguin
Reid -Middleton
324 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
HARVE H. HARRISON
MAYM
PLANKING DIVISION
`:'.. 1
Y
r/
IJ
�
1
IN.�''
a.
1
CF,
'i .
{ ".
N
Y ,
rw ir
'o�
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
November 21, 1979
The lleo order
regular
7e35ing of p.m. inhthedmonds Board of Council Chambers of hent was EdmondsaCivictCenters by Chairman
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Paul Roy Muryl Medina Richard Pearson, Asst. City Planner
Jack Byrd Ann Derleth Larry Martin, City Attorney
Bill Leraas Harold Hatzenbuhler Wayne Tanakag ParrettCityputy City Clerk
Anne McGee
Chairman Roy welcomed the audience and explained the functions of the Board, the
procedure for handling of the hearings, and the method of appealing decisions of the
Board.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MR. LERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. BYRD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 1979.
MOTION CARRIED.
REPORT FROM STAFF
Mr. Pearson advised that three items on this evening's a enda should be continued to
the next meeting. With regard to V42-79 (BILL LeCLAIRE�, he said he had heard
nothing from Mr. LeClaire since the last meeting but the Engineering Division had
been meeting with him on the issue of the driveway slope and they recommended the
item be continued. The adjacent property owner, Mr. Johnston, who was working with
Mr. LeClaire on a joint driveway, was present but he said he did not represent Mr.
LeClaire inasmuch as he hadn't been able to contact him recently. MR. BYRD MOVED,
SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS, TO CONTINUE V42499 CU-5649, AND 04149 TO THE DECEMBER
MEETING. MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED AGENDA
CU4649 JAMES LYMAN as Conditional Use Permit for day care in the home at 23727 78th
Pie We (R94)
This item was continued from the previous month. However, Anne McGee was
new to the Board this month and had not been present for the public hearing
on this matter and had not listened to the tape recording of the hearing.
She was therefore disqualified from participating in this decision and
without her the Board lacked a quorum. MR. BYRD THEREFORE MOVED, SECONDED
BY MR. LERAAS, TO CONTINUE CU4649 TO THE DECEMBER MEETING. MOTION CARRIED.
Before taking this action the Board waited until it was apparent another
member would not be arriving, and the situation was explained to the
applicant.
V-7549 CARL MUNSON - Variance from required lot, easement, and pavement width at
19309 Olympic View Dr. (RS-12)
The proposal was to provide access to two lots on a 15' easement with the
pavement 15' wide, where normally a 20' easement is required with 18' wide
pavement. Mr. Pearson recommended approval because it was a minimum variance
and because a variance would not be required if another driveway were
installed on the other side of the lot. There did not appear to be any
reason to have two driveways, however, if one could be shared. The public
portion of the hearing was opened. Howard Olds represented the applicant
and said this was a two -lot subdivision with an easement to a landlocked
lot. He said they would like to see a driveway with only 12' wide paving
but would accept 15' if that was required. No one else wished to speak,
and the public portion of the hearing was closed. Mr. Leraas felt this
appeared to be practical and a better solution than two driveways and it
provided access to a landlocked piece of property. Mr. Byrd agreed that
dP
I
this was practical under the circumstances and Mrs. McGee saw no other
reasonable way to do it. MR. LERAAS MOVED, SECONDED BY MR, BYRD, TO APPROVE
V45-79 AS IT APPEARED TO BE A PRACTICAL SOLUTION FOR A LANDLOCKED PIECE OF
PROPERTY AND WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED.
AGENDA
CU-70-79 HAN Z. PARK as icndittionnal Use Permit for grading in excess of 500 cu. yds.
aL TffymP Vew
This proposal was to excavate approximately 2,000 cu, yds. of earth from
the applicant's property. Grading would be in the southeast corner of his
lot which abuts Olympic View Dr. The result would be to move a fairly
steep slope back on the property so he would have a large flat area. The
Engineering Division saw no problems which could not be handled and Mr.
Pearson t;aid this proposal would not endanger the health and safety of,the
neighborhood and would not be injurious to abuttingproperty.
Pearson could not recommend approval because the policies of the Comprehensive
Plan allow grading on steep slopes only for necessary roads and building
pads, both of which already exist on the applicant's lot. The public
portion of the hearing was opened. The applicant said that when he built
the house three years ago he carved out the area and moved the soil to the
nearby ravine. He did not feel his present proposal would be detrimental
to the adjoining lot, which he also owns. He said when he graded it the
first time he seeded the hillside which had been effective, and he planned
to do that again and also install some rockery. He had experienced no
drainage problems, even during the last bad storm, so he did not anticipate
any such problem. No trees would be involved, and he planned to construct
a tennis court in the cleared area, along with landscaping it. The public
portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. LERAAS,
TO APPROVE CU-70-79 BECAUSE IT DID -NOT APPEAR TO BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF OTHERS IN THE VICINITY AND BECAUSE THE TYPE
OF USE TO
BE MADENT THE INITHIS IT
MOTION
CARRIED.
V4749 GLEN E. BARRETT - Variance for lot width to length ratio at 7700 175th St.
This application was in conjunction with a 4-lot subdivision. The Zoning
Code requirement for lot width to length ratio is .4 and the proposal was
to reduce that to approximately .25. The applicant indicated this lot
would not be built upon by itself but would be incorporated into the property
west of Lot 4 which is also owned by the applicant. Mr. Pearson recommended
approval on the condition that a covenant be placed on Lot 4 requiring that
it not be a building site unless combined with the applicant's adjoining
property to the west. The public portion of the hearing was opened.
Jurgen Sauerland of Lovell-Sauerland and Associates, representing the
applicant, said there would be no objection to the recommended covenant.
The public portion of the hearing was closed. MR. BYRD MOVED, SECONDED BY
MR, LERAAS, TO APPROVE V47499 SUBJECT TO A COVENANT'S BEING PLACED ON LOT
4 IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS THAT LOT 4 NOT BE MADE A BUILDING SITE
EXCEPT IN COMBINATION WITH PROPERTY TO THE WEST, THE ESSENSE OF GRANTING
THIS VARIANCE BEING TO TREAT THE PROPERTY AS HAVING A CHANGE IN LOT LINE.
THE REASON FOR APPROVING THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF SIZE
AND SHAPE OF THE PROPERTY NOT GENERALLY APPLICABLE TO OTHER PROPERTY IN THE
AREA, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE ZONING CODE FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE NORMAL
MANNER WOULD DEPRIVE THE APPLICANT OF RIGHTS COMMONLY ENJOYED BY OTHER
PROPERTIES IN THE DISTRICT. MOTION CARRIED,
V-78-79 JOSEPH CLIFFV ORDsoVariance from height limitation and side and rear setbacks
es We
The proposal was to legalize an existing treehouse/platform that is too
close to the side and rear property lines and is too high. It is 37 high,
the maximum height being 25'. If a variance on the height were granted the
maximum it could be would be 3519 so even with a variance it would have to
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 2 as November 219 1979