19516 94TH PL W.PDF111111111111
9235
19516 94TH PL W
7P
CAFILENO.
Critical Areas Checklist
(soils/topography/hydrology/vegetation)
I. Site Address/Location: bheee- 7431' 6,40-- 41- t,,/
2 fto�eW414 Account Number: L13 (/-(0- ceya :E� '0.2 0
3 YW6�44ifiW*e Size (acres or square feet): 20'X/S-�r'
4. Is this site currently developed? _yes; 1< no.
If yes; how is site developed?
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less'than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% ( a ventical rise
of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
X Steep: grades of greater than 30 % present on site (a vertical rise of I 0-feet over a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: Approx. Depth:
7. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the flood A10 fl'oodplain of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-
round? X)o Flows are seasonal? . (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested 2!� meadow _;shrubs X mixed.
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
... ... .... For City Staff Use Only —
Site is Zoned?
12�:.* -SCS mapped soil type(s)? —fverolYr :tP.C-yr,1(.f 7,C-70r. StoA
Wedand inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site? AI/O
4;, ---'-.-:.Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? Ya
:5... - Site. within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? /00
.-Sit6 designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map?
.DETERMINATION
STUDY REQUIRED CONDITIONAL WAIVER
WAIVER
R�Viewed by: 400#1
49PIanner Date
Rem 011004
A.41.7: A"
0 - I
% C
City of Edmonds' 7
Critical Areas _Ch e__'c`k_'list',-
RECEIVED
AUG 0 TIM
PWCOUMM-
lbe. Critical Areas Checklist contained onr .:.t
ir,., and submit it to the City. The City will
this form is to be filled out by any person
rMew the checklist, make a precursory site
preparing a Development Permit
visit, and make a determination of the
Application for the City of Edmonds prior
subsequent steps necessary to complete a
to his/her submittal of adevelopm ent"
development permit application.
permit to the City.
A-0
With a signed copy of this form, the
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
applicant should also�submit a vicinity map
City staff to determine whether any
or plot plan for individual lots of the parcel
potential Critical Areas are or may be.
enough detail that City staff can find
present on the subject property. The
and identify the subject parcel(s). In
information needed to complete the
addition', the applicant shall include
Checklist should -be easily available from'-_,-,
'otheipertinent. information (e.g. site,
observations of the site or data available at -
plan, topography map, etc.) or studies in
City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, !naps,
with this Checklist to assist
or soil surveys).
,conjunction
staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site.
An applicant, or his/her representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it,
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Applicant:
t9Z- M T L) T ; rL
.Narne
1! 5; - / /__: � 1�?: V 100/ 1 All,
Street Address �W>-o
77,6
C, State, ZIP Phone
Signature Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
I Street Address
City, State, ZIP
. . . Signature
Phone
Date
A
�t _7 �-o
V.
STREET FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - Sth AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER May 16, 1984
David and Olga Tuttle
19516 - 94th Pl. West
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tuttle:
LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
MAYOR
In the past, the City of Edmonds Engineering Department
conducted several reviews of the intersection of Puget
Drive and 94th Place West. As you are aware, in the process
of the Vinyard Property Subdivision, discussion took place
and it was agreed to restrict the intersection to a right -in,
right -out only operation. These hearings were posted and the
neighbors were notified. The reason for these restrictions
is the limited sight distance for vehicles exiting 94th Place
West in judging oncoming westbound Puget Drive traffic. It is
our contention that the intersection, in its current state,
does not provide sufficient sight distance to allow drivers
enough reaction time for the left turn movement. This was
also the judgment and recommendation of the Vinyard's engineer,
Reid, Middleton and Associates.
Unfortunately, there is no easy solution to correct the
existing condition. Cutting back the side slope on Puget
Drive and replacing the retainage wall is very expensive and,
in fact, may not improve the sight distance enough to allow
the left turn. I do not believe a third lane, which your
April 16 letter refers to, would improve the sight distance
enough to allow the left turn movement. In fact, it would
make Puget Drive wider, requiring even more time to execute a
left turn. The best solution would be to provide another
access to the properties.
I cannot recommend allowing left turns at this inter-
section. I realize this causes some inconvenience to the
residents, however, in our engineering judgment, it is better
to allow the inconvenience over allowing accidents at this
intersection.
Sincerely,
� JAME % AD
C i �ngineer
DS/st
cc: Lois Vinyard
William and Melissa Wright
Ae.
DT-e-Schroeder Dt
April 16, 1984
To: J,iM Adams
..Engineering Dept.
200 Dayton Ave.
Edmonds, Wa. 98020
REC E IV ED
pR 21
, 1984
ENGINEER19C
This is concerning the intersection at 94th Plqce West and Puget
Drive, State Highway #524.
We have been living at our' present address.since 1.962 and have
had no problems with our driveway until Puget Drive was beautified.
Rock was piled up alongside alnew sidewalk and took away enough of
our line of vision that it became impossible to see clearly into the
westbound lane of traffic..
We had a consultation with some city planners at this location
and they concluded that we needed traffic revision. This was.done
and has compounded our problem. Now when we approach our driveway
(94th Place . West) from the west, we have to drive to the top of the
hill (88th West, which is also a hazardous intersection) to turn
around and re -approach it from the east. This amounts to nearly one
mile (.8 on the oddometer). On leaving the driveway to go east vie
must now go west until we can find a safe turn around.
Talk has reached our ears that, we raay have all of this solved
with a. -,third lane. This might work in the future but we need your
help now. We need at least as much visibility as we had before all
of these improvements.
Sinc,q
.7ely,
David & Olga Tuttle
19516 94th Place west
Edmonds, Wa. 98020
cc: Bobby Mills
Engineering Dept., Edmonds, wa.
Ron Bockstruck
Washington State Transportation Dept.
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT NAME WORK START NUMBER
David & O�ga Tuttle DATE AND TIME E-4-67
19516 - 94th Pl. W.
SUMMARY
Intersection at 94th Pl. W. & Pugtt Drive.
Poor visability. Requesting our help in solving
problem.
FROM DATE
ST- 4-2 -841
TO TO TO TO T
.. Adams D. Schroel Jer
DATE DAT ;& DATE DATE DATE
Mr. Jim Adams
City Engineer
200 Dayton St.
Edmonds, Wa. 98020
Dear Mr. Adams:
Edmonds, Washington
April 18, 1984
R icF
. -IVED
APR 2 4 IS94
WME91MG
I am writing to express my concerns about our private road, 94th
Place West, where it meets Puget Drive, State Highway #524.
When said highway was Oimproved" a rock.wall was put up alongside.
the sidewalk. This greatly impaired our vision of traffic approach-
ing from the east. Now, in the.piocess of allowing a sub -division
of my property, we are prohibited from making left turns in either
direction. The "no left turn" when approaching from the west is
especially inconvenient, as we must drive almost.a mile out of our
way when coming from that direction. We have been making left turns
here safely for twenty-five years and th,ink this restriction is
unnecessary,
I did not realize that this was included in the plans for my sub-
division. The traffic pattern as it now stands is not only very
inconvenient ' for all of us who live here, but will make it diffi-
cult, if not impossible
,)for me to sell my valuable view property.
Any assistance you can give us in solving this problem will be
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lois M. Vinyard
cc: Bobby Mills
Engineering Dept.
Edmonds, Wa.
Ron Bockstruck
Washington State Transportation Dept.
Seattle, Wa.
Edmonds, Washington
23 April 1984
VAN
A.71
Mr. Jim Adams
City Engineer
200 Dayton Street
Edmonds, Washington 93020
Regarding the intersection of 94th Place West and Puget Drive,
State Highway # 524, we are concerned with the restrictions placed
on the flow of traffic at this point.
You have eliminated traffic from heading east onto Puget Drive.
Before this road was improved (?) we had adequate visibility up the
hill and entered Puget Drive with confidence. Now such is not the case.
-------------
Driving east on Puget Drive and wanting to enter onto 94th Place W.
always has given us good visibility up Puget Drive and a left turn made
safely. You have taken this away from us and compel us to drive to
negotiate a turn at 88th and 196th, a much worse, no visibility situation.
Compelling us to a right turn only, when entering Puget Drive is
actually a more scary.situation as most cars must cross the west bound
lane and into.the eastbound lane to make the "U" turn; thus putting
the car into the path of traffic coming up the hill.
I am sure you have heard from others in our area confronted with
this situation and we would like the opportunity to meet with you to
resolve our dilemma.
Sine rel yours
Wrl
William K. Zght
Melissa Wright
19520 94th Pl. W.
Edmonds, Washington 98020
APPLICATION
ff R, E E-F FU
for
The City of Ed s SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS
OWNER.... ...... ...................................................
e6
ADDRESS... ........ ............ ......... .......................
taA T
c7'
-N
LLJ
14r,
APPROVEr
FEB 28 iqs�
EASEMENT No - ------------------------------------------
-7� ............ .......
CONTRACTOR ..................... ..... ( --------- ----------------- PERMIT No.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . ....................... * ---------------------- BLOCK No . ............................................
NAME OF ADDITION ...................................... . ...... 6jf� .................................... ..................................
.z
U.
T;
Approved:
DATE ...... ? ..... ............... ............ By
1'�
'CITY OF EDMONDS
Call PR&pect* 6-1107 when work
IVIC CENTER'— WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT
/C' is ready for inspection; (No i-T. N?. 2768
tions Saturday, Sunday or -holidays.)
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
5 djq " gurt.
ADDRESS ----------- 19 ... 15 --- 91-VMP ... ne�& ------_----- ------------------------------- . .......................... . .............................................
OWNER --------------- D&Vid_& ---- TUt-tle ........................................ CONTRACTOR ------ ------ L -------_---__----_-----
a side sewer
Perniission is granted ....... Fehm-i� ----------- 2A 19_6.8., for ........................ days to REPAIR or CONNECT
With City Sewers in. accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. I —The owners of the property may obtain a per . mit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
ted.
be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspec
7, No. 2—Obtain full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completi on.
NOTE No. 5--It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appur
tenanc6s except to insert the pipe into the wye.
k
Tha t portion of T r a ct. .5 9, Ed=ohds. Sea View Tracts, as, per plat recorded in.'
Volume 3-of Plats on pa"ge. 76*,:'de.scribed as follows:
Be(yinning at th* -So''th'
e u west torner*.of said Tract 59; thence North along
the West line 8.6 :f(.!et.;,. thence -North 83*54'57" East parallel to the
South line 166...16. f la.e. t* the*n*ce-South parallel to'the west line 80 feet
to the South line thorce. South .83 54'511" 'lest for 166.116.feP'C to the
OC
true point of b
TOGETIER with aQ k
n.ea.sement.for ingres.s., egress and utilities, over and
across a strip, O,:f land'. 40� feet in. width, ..the, center line of 'which is
described as follows:
Beginning,at 9, poipt-.6n ihe'.,Nokth line of Tract 58, Edm8nds Sea -View
Tracts, as pe.r�.p'lat,te c'or.de&in'Volume 3 of Plats on page 76, records
of Snohomish C6uinty.'th.at is 'North 83'54'57" East 156.21 feet from the
Northwest corner thereof;.. -thence South 0*19!27" West for 180.feet; thence
South 57040'331'..E�ast for...240 ..feet, more or less, to the Northerly right-.
of -way line of the.Brack I ett.,Lan I ding, k6a�, EXCEPT there'from any portion
!which might cross'Tract'25 of, Puget Sound Machinery De'pot Five Acre
Tracts, as per �piat're'corded :in Vo(luma 5 of Plats on page 47, records of
Snohomish 'County;. .,sit.uate:.iri the County of Snohomish, State of Washington
VOL. 821 PARtIJ9
i
NOTICE:
N ..War-ra'!;)-Ey ... ar -a.-.c
o ation'shown c)n the a-ttached
The Jnform
MaP(S) was com ' piled for use by the OtY 01
Edmonds/ its Employees and Consultants.
Th,.e City of **Edm.onds does. not. warrant the
accuracy of anything set for.th on t. * hese
M a p ('S-'-). A n . y person or entity -requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the infcbrm'ation shown, c
7-- -�� I I
'ncludingl but not i'mited to,
the lotation of any sewer stub shown. SU(
-sewer stubs may or may- not e.xlst and ma�,
-he location shown.
or may not exist at t
r-;ty of Edmonr%,14 S/ nor its
Nei -their the �� I i-ce*rs'sha-H be Viab]--e for
empl-oyee-s 0-r ' off. nor for
information given on this map(5),
ion pr 'ded bas
ntat' ovi ed
any one represe
upon said map(s'