19525 80TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
7096
19525 80TH AVE W
J41fy
600,",fo
0AId tip
'Pol,la
J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE
SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
THEREIN ON MAY 21,1996, BY MAIL BALLOT, OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING THE
CITY TO INCUR INDEBTEDNESS BY ISSUING ITS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN A
PAR MOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $9,275,000, PAYABLE BY ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX LEVIES
TO BE MADE IN EXCESS OF REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PAYING THE COSTS TO CONSTRUCT PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES INCLUDING A
POLICE DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING AT FIFTH AVENUE AND
BELL STREET; AND FIRE STATION 7 AT FIFTH AVENUE AND EDMONDS STREET; AND
REPLACE FIVE CORNERS FIRE STATION 6, AND TO LEVY THOSE EXCESS PROPERTY
TAXES
Mayor Fahey stated that this would be a mail -in ballot and that citizens would be receiving their ballots
shortly after May 3, 1996 and must be mailed back by May 21, 1996.
A
'iMWCW1N1TJe1713` 1XID.
Police Chief Miller presented information regarding the forming of COPPS, when the department
looked at ways to impact crime with more lasting effect about a year and a half ago. Chief Miller at that
time identified a group of employees that would be willing to participate on a Community Policing Task
Force who would identify strategies. This Task Force started to work on developing a five-year plan for
Community Policing and one of the strategies was the "Town Hall Meeting" process to find out what the
citizens believed their specific problems to be, not what the Police Department might think were their
problems. In doing this they worked with neighborhood groups that came to the meetings and asked
them to identify the five problems they were most concerned with and also help provide two possible,
solutions for these, problems. Chief Miller went on to state that the town hall aspect wasn't the only
thing they were doing but also involving citizens in the processes more frequently. The Police
Department was involving citizens in the hiring and promotional process and also in creating a Citizens
Advisory Council that meets on a monthly basis to discuss issues like the building, equipment needs, and
the citizens bring back needs that they see in the community. He then stated that the Task Force has
expanded to include Lynnwood Police, Mountlake Terrace Police, and SnoCom to create the South
Snohomish County COPPS Task Force.'
Chief Miller next asked the Council to adopt Resolution No. 840 which states that Community -Oriented
Policing and Problem -Solving shall be the formal philosophy of policing for the City of Edmonds.
COUNCILMEMBER MYERS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HAAKENSON,
FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 840. MOTION CARRIED.
6A. DISCUSSION AND PROPOSED ACTIONS RELATED TO
DECISION ON RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION REQUEST ADJACEVIT613,0�,
80TH AVE. W.
Paul Mar recalled the history of this item. After the Public Safety Committee Meeting on March 12
staff was directed to investigate how much of the comer the City would need to secure from the property
owner to achieve sufficient turning radius and sight distance. Jim Walker, City Engineer, concluded that
182 square feet of Mr. Johnson's property was needed to achieve the turning radius and sighting distance
objectives. Mr. Walker contacted the property owner to see if a property trade might be made to which
Mr. Johnson was agreeable.
City Council Approved Minutes
March 25,1996
Page 4
00- 4130.1i
spirvoL,
.rJ0,4
1, 1994
,146Y ;t
4. CONSIDERATION AND ACTION ON ORDINANCE NO. 3077 PROVIDING FOR THE
SUBMISSION TO VOTERS OF THE CITY AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY
21, 1996, OF A PROPOSITION AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO INCUR INDEBTEDNESS BY
ISSUING ITS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN A PAR AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
$9,275,000, PAYABLE BY ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX LEVIES TO BE MADE IN EXCESS OF
REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PAYING THE COSTS TO
CONSTRUCT PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES INCLUDING A POLICE DEPARTMENT AND
MUNICIPAL COURT BUILDING AT FIFTH AVENUE AND BELL STREET; AND F - IRE
STATION 7 AT FIFTH AVENUE AND EDMONDS STREET; AND REPLACE FIVE CORNERS
FIRE STATION 6, AND TO LEVY THOSE EXCESS PROPERTY TAXES
Paul Mar stated that the information in the packet tonight was the ordinance and proposition ballot. He
asked Mayor Fahey to unveil a scale model of the future Public Safety Campus. Mr. Mar stated that the
model would be available to citizens to view, and he went on to state that this was a representation of
what the campus might'look like, not an actual specific rendering of an architect's plans. Mr. Mar shared
his sense of pride in what happened last week with the turn out of support and also expressed his thanks
to the Council for all the effort they had put into this plan.
Councilmember Petruzzi repeated his comments from last week (because of television failure last
week) stating that the need is now for the Public Safety Building; it is not planning for the'year 2020 and
that these facilities are needed now. Mr. Petruzzi stated that the Council had worked very hard to get to
this point and that this was the culmination of a lot of work by a lot of people. Mr. Petruzzi went on to
answer the unasked question regarding why not take the money out of the City's budget, and stated that
the Council had already used money from the budget to help purchase the Financial Center for
$5,000,000 and that there simply wasn't enough in the budget to cover both. Councilmember Petruzzi
reminded everyone that this would not be just a simple majority to win this proposition but 60% of the
vote. He urged all citizens to support the City government in this project.
Councilmember Myers stated that he had been impressed not only by the work the Council and staff
had done but that of the citizens that have stepped forward to help bring this project to completion.
Councilmember Haakenson expressed that the need for new Fire, Police and Court facilities has been
well documented and that the Mayor, Council, and Staff have tried to bring forward a plan that would
provid . e for public safety needs at bare bones cost and he is pleased to add his support to the bond issue
and urges everyone else to do the same.
Councilmember Nordquist noted that the City's inventory of property had continued to grow. He
mentioned the underwater park, the Senior Center, the Library (the City Council stepped forward and
built the current library), a new Waste Water Treatment Plant (that came in under budget), Esperance
Fire Station, and the Driftwood Theater. He added that now it's time to retire the oldest buildings on the
inventory and replace it with a more adequate facility.
Council President Earling added that Councilmember Van Hollebeke is an adamant supporter of this
project and hoped it would move forward tonight.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETRUZZI,
FOR ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3077 CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO
AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE REFERENCED BOND; AND TO DIRECT STAFF
TO COMPLETE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO DELIVER A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS'
ORDINANCE TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY ELECTION OFFICIALS AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN APRIL 5,1996. MOTION CARRIED. The ordinance adopted
reads as follows:
City Council Approved Minutes
March 25, 1996
Page 3
Councilmember Petruzzi stated that one of the issues the Council had was the traffic which is presumed
to be growing and if so was this new turning radius going to be enough.
Councilmember Myers explained that at the Public Safety Committee Meeting they were given
assurances from the police that the street in its new width would be a very safe street. The concern was
for traffic turning onto 80th from 196th so if there was more street on that comer it would be easier for
everybody to make the turn.
Paul Mar stated that as per the diagram on the last page of the packet presented this evening, the City
takes an additional 182 square feet of the comer in order to make that possible. This is property that is
owned by Mr. Johnson and the City would take that in trade for the right -of -vacation he came forward
with.
Councilmember Petruzzi suggested that this be put on the Consent Agenda for next week.
.4,� " - :'1 1
6. JOINT DISCUSSION WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND RECOMMEND TION ON
ADOPTION OF INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING REGULATORY REFORM
f P'l)
120A The Planning Board members in attendance were: Gary Grayson, Rob Morrison, Melody Tereski, Chris
Keuss, Bruce Witenberg, Lynn Lacy, and Phyllis Becker. Chris Keuss, Chair, opened the discussion by
reviewing the questions asked by the Council at the previous meeting on February 27. Mr. Keuss then
read the Board's recommendations as follows:
I ) Parks and Recreation should remain under the review of the Planning Board. Mr. Keuss had
spoken with Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Manager, and she agreed with this in principle. The
Planning Board should continue to review development and master planning issues on at least a quarterly
basis as well as policy issues, as well as changes in the codes that have an impact on the community.
2) The Ad -hoc Downtown Parking Committee should continue to report to the Council. Changes in
policy, administrative procedures and code that effect the community should be reviewed by the.
Planning Board with recommendations sent to the Council prior to formal review. The Planning Board
feels that the current setup is working well, but would like the Ad -hoc Downtown Parking Committee to
come to the Planning Board on possibly a quarterly basis. The Board would also like the option of
having a representative on the Ad -hoc Committee.
Mr. Keuss moved recommendation #3 to the bottom of the list and continued on with the list of
recommendations.
4) Quasi-judicial matters under the Planning Board's review should be maintained. Comprehensive
Plan and Elements adopted by reference and any other plans associated by reference should remain under
the Planning Board's review.
5) The Board shall report its recommendations directly to the Council as succinctly and thoroughly
as possible.
6) The number of Planning Board members would remain the same. There are currently seven
regular members with one alternate.
City Council Approved Minutes
March 25, 1996
Page 5
7) Representatives from Parks and Recreation, Parking Ad -hoc Committee and any other
committees which review planning and land development matters should report their progress to the
Board quarterly. Mr. Keuss stated this would help the Board be informed and will help in making
recommendations to the Council. Council President Earling inquired if the Board had a mechanism in
place to make sure this happens; how did they plan to make sure they are getting quarterly repprts. Mr.
Keuss stated that he thought that could be done by communicating with Rob Chave, Planning Manager,
and Arvilla Ohlde, Parks and Recreation Manager, and having them put this report on the extended
agenda in advance.
3) The Architectural Design Board (ADB) should continue to hold quasi-judicial hearings for
single -permit matters under their review. In multi -permit applications, the ADB should act in a public
forum role in order to collect substantive information for the Hearing'Examiner's formal hearing process.
Councilmember Petruzzi asked Rob Chave, Planning Manager, to comment on this recommendation.
Mr. Chave stated that under regulatory reform they have to have a consolidated process in which a
project can have a single hearing, and with the ADB 90% of what they do is not a problem. The only
problem comes up in situations where a variance or a conditional use permit is required. In that case the
recommendation is the ADB would function as just another group of staff. The ADB will have a public
meeting, not a hearing, and the ADB would come up with a set of recommendation to be passed on to the
Hearing Examiner where the formal hearing would occur. The Hearing Examiner would be charged with
considering this information. Because of this the ADB will need to have two meetings a month to keep
up with the timeline that will be imposed.
Phil Olbrechts, City Attorney, stated that in the situation where the ADB has to have a public meeting
instead of a public hearing, not that much is lost in the decision making process for the ADB. They can
still advertise and take testimony. They would have all the same people and information available but it
would not be part of the official initial record.
Council President Earling stated if the ADB gives the recommendation to the Hearing Examiner it seems
to give the illusion of having two hearings. Phil Olbrechts, City Attorney, stated that there really isn't
that much difference; the only real difference is that the official record is not developed by the ADB.
Melody Tereski pointed out that the RCW does call for "...public meetings after effective notice,
provision of open discussion, communication programs, information services, and consideration of and
response to public comments.."
Mayor Fahey stated that it seemed a little unclear since historically the ADB has imposed requirements
that can send plans back to the drawing board and prolong the process so the timeline isn't met. Melody
Tereski stated she didn't think that's the way it would work. She compared it to the way the Planning
Board works with the City Council.
Council President Earling inquired as to why the Planning Board felt that a mandatory pre -application
meeting was not necessary at this time. Rob Chave stated this would force all applicants and the City to
sit down and discuss and identify all the permits, all the requirements, all the applications and talk about
the process. Mr. Chave stated that this would add time spent in the permit process. In the case where the
City felt it was necessary they would try and accomplish a pre -application meeting, however, in a lot of
cases it would not be necessary.
City Council Approved Minutes
March 25, 1996
Page 6
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 25, 1996
To: Paul Mar
From: Jim Walker
Subject: STREET VACATION AT 19525 80th AVE W
Jeff Wilson contacted Ken Johnson regarding the proposal to exchange
property on the comer of 196th St SW and 80th Ave W for vacation of right-
of-way on 80th Avenue W. Attached is the sketch Ken Johnson faxed back
to Jeff and an original drawing of the proposed exchange.
The distance vacated on 80th Avenue W would change from 125 feet to 100
feet. The City. would retain walkway and utility easements on the vacated
parcel. The comer property granted to the City would allow improvements
to the comer to provide better transit movement in the future as discussed at
the Public Safety Committee meeting last month. Although the dedicated
property is smaller than the vacated property, the easement on the vacated
property has value for the City also. I believe the City will gain value with
the proposed arrangement.
cc: Jeff Wilson
Attachment
0
From: Mr. Kenneth L Johnson & To: Jeffrey Wilson Date: 8121196 Time: 10. 19:44
Paue I of 2
H.
c
4
MAR 2 2 ig,96
NQW ENGINEEHING
.Tmv[;Lg
f rAIX
lb&ak
?P-O?0:5W "LAND- 5WIAF"'. -
t -7-AC96D 1769- OUQ
A?
COWE26A7101V OF 3120196
CEN
IT PUDC T?-% 14
kip.
74. R15AT COVCP\.
To: Jeffrey- Wilson
From: Mr. Kenneth L Johnson Jr.
Cover Pages by Deldna 3/21/96 10.1610 Aitwork used mfth perrrdssion. 0 1990 John CaWwell
MAR 2 2 iqqg
ENGINE&iING
�SCYTH Ai/E W
Ct,4;1 A4 PmA",eio s4wea vmeq,�J-
8
AJO IM,4~ OA.I. t
14A-Ilr r4WolA2jVW
4.19" led
AM
A Y
.9 52 5
aluff uw Mft I%= V
SM AW 10.4" IF
M
ms"
I
EP
# 8408160078
EXIST LOT AREA- 10,331 SF
MIN LOT SIZE = 9,600 SF
5�,VACATION = 500 SF
D I CATION 182 SF
City of Edmon&.
Critica" I Ar6as
Checklist
ne, C-fifical Areas C1WXWW Contained on
this fonn is to'be filied out by any person
prcparing a DeMopmeat ptrmit
Application for the- City of Edmonds
.pnor
to histher submittal of a development
pevrnit to the City.
The PuqxW of the ChcMist is to enable
City staff to ddavaine whedw =y
potential Cdfical Aveas aveor may be
present on die subj= pwpedy. ne
information acedw to cow4aft ft
Cho"St should becasilyavaftlefrogn
bbsomations of dre site or data available at
CitY Hall (Ctitical Amas iaventO&S. naqn.
-or soil survep).
An .1pplicant. or lisffiw
mug fifl out Me dwddis4
sign ad date it.
R 1: 5 1995
PERMIT COUNTER
a0submitit to dv-- City necity*va
mview the dwIdist. malm a precursory site
visk and nzake a damMinafion of the
a4"uent Uqu G==uY SO complete a
dwdqp==t PmWt applicafion.
VVith a skned copy of this form. the
VpIkant should also submit a vidtft mp
,or ji7m plan for ii�_
with *WtO detaH dot City staffean find
MW Weaffy the. sWjca pareWS). In
adMans the app5cant shall Indude
*doer perfinent Wonwfian (eg. she
plaas tq*Wapby map. etc.) or gadies in
C040=600 wft U& Cbeciffig to VqSiA
SWIM conqfieting thew P, ji
mmCmalcut Of the site.
G I '4TI TERCTj'
RC
Mjb7Lr FZ
Owner/ AppricauL-'
Apprant Rep JffWP,.,dkeR0UjLEr
io
ISTNEWWWWO
Name C*_3,
N*W
M
-,WNW
It
v " W
CA FRE
CrMcal'Areas Checkikst
site
otXr. Imik"
I. sg
2- Property Tax `A�o� Number: OM CV-7 00
3. APProx7anne Site Size (acres or square feet)-- _ja bqt) SF
4., Is this site cun=dy deveippee
. X-YICS; no.
If yes; how is site 4ewmdopep_ (1) -cAW MftT rFSjPEWCr
5- Dmcribe &e general site topogrift. Cho* all that apply.
FLZC less than 54a devation dtange over F F fir C site
ROMW slopes On she generally lea dma 15% (a vadcal riseof 10-feet over a
hormontal daitanee of 66-feet)
MHY-- SIOPCS FCSCM 00 sk* Of mm &aQ 15% and less dma 30% (a vaCKW d.
of 10-fod ever a ho&oatal dtista= of33 W &t0d).
StOW zmdes aftreaw dian 30% PreSOX On Site (a Vafical Cise of 10-feetover a
horkoutal often than 33-fmo.
04kc (Please
6- Side 00atfim I Of yew4omd stanfing water. Appm3L DqW -
7. Sime; Contains am of Seasonal saaft water. NO AppW3L Depth:.,
WbAseason(s)oftheycar?
Sift is in the Iood*ay__t%J0 doodpwm _'00 .0favatercoutm
9. Site Conteins a Cmek Gran numbem WIMM'do"s
mune Flow= semad? NO (Wha ewe Rows are year%-
ofycu?
10. skeis UY-0 lorested ;.meadow _;sbmbs
urban landscaped GawnAumbs cte) )<
11. Obvious wedand is Present On ae:
aw staffusi
7
=a-typocs)? 5 - I-PJA(,W6Vt" UV44,.-
, Dec.. !M!P
tauth subsi
affw4x"
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information'shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of 'Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity -requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
tHe map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may'not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or offiCerS) sh-all be -liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
4. J '141- APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds Uwffla7 Flljw SWE SEw= P=MT
CONSTRUC77ON 9�-- REPAIRS
EASEMENT No,.C24) 1.�vva� . ............
1-p q
.......................................... PERMIT No..,/'
OWNER
------------------------------- CONTRACTOR -----
1-000ACACIP 941VI"&.140 VSj4drR PLPP\&,r-�
ADDRESS ... lj;�—,2A . . ......... F7 --.:W . ............. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No 7 . ... ......... ... BLOCK IT, q;4r�
... ...... ww-
. ................. . .................................. I
3i- 4 L 4 1 f ioiats av p,71 &- ,;? iee,",e as
NAME OF ADDITION
Approved:
DATE .......... 3;3Y�'�—AO ....
-Yw:
'T
Mo
:ED N6S
CaSI PRospect 6-1107 when work
CIVIC' �CENTER� WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT
Is ready for. lnsp"tlqn.(No,ifis*� 1`10
Id7
Hors' Saturdayl- Suhday hol ay 2843
SIDE. SEW. ER PERMIT
ADDRESS ............................... 19525.,n ... ... Av ue�,:�Weat ....... .............
RCLth en ............ ................................ ......................
'_�tow M rril-B. Osborne
.................. .......................................................................... CONTRACTOR ... Nor.th-w.es.t ... S-e.wer .... Cq.n.qt..! ... Cq:rp,..
Perniission is granted ..... Mar-ch .... 2.1 ................... Ig..6.8., for ........................ days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
With City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a Permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
be employed to,construct side sewer In street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
NOTE No. 2—Obtain full -information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30.Inches coverage at property line and 12 Inches Inside property line; minimum grade of 2%.
No bends in grade sharper than % will be permitted.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches In street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
N(._JNo. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do -any other work than is provided for In the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or Its appur-
tenances except to insert the pipe Into the wye.