The URL can be used to link to this page

19631 80TH PL W.PDF111111111111 7273 19631 80TH PL W ADDRESS: 1 1 W t -,/ I ok.� TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL NUMBER:__u BUILDfNG PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE). COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER): Bid 10111511 11.k-il PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: SEWER LID FEE S: SHORT PLAT FILE: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S).#: A- GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver E] Study Required Waiver LID #: �0 LOT. BLOCK: LATEMMSrsTorruskStrect File Checklist-doc ------------ F W-0-1 Existi g S " ad b T-0". 27'-6" 5. 7 Existing Cov:red Concrete P tio I �� 20 Existing Asphalt Wwe.ay CP �-J 5116- Main Street 1501-01, ------------------------------ 20 \"O. . Existing Shed stng Shed 10 Existing Residence 1440 sq.ft. "Nothing in this permit approval proem dull be interpreted as allowing (-- Permitting the m zx'l aintenance of any cu'rently existing illegal, nonconformLrig or unpermitte�d building, structure -58'-9 13/16" or site condition wffich is outside flhe scope of the Porch \10 _P1 permit application, regardless of whether such byilding, structure or condition is shown on the gite&n or drawing. Such building, structure or xisting Concrete con ition may be the subject of a separate Ex s= 2Wal enforcement action." Plot Plan Zone Comer U-1 r—eA Act9all Front X Sides 'e zz Rear Other 0 MAY — 5 2008 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS STREET FILE NOTICE: No warranty of accuracy. The information'shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The City of �Edmoncls does not warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on these map(s-). Any person or entity -req uesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the information shown on tKe -map(s), including, but not limited to, the location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may, not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmonds nor its emp-l-o-yees o-r offiCers sh-all be 1--iab-l-e for the information given on this map(s), nor for any one representation provided based upon said map(s).. APPLICATION The Vity 91 Edmontft--,---'�—r- 2 EMS for ALL SIDE SEWJM PERMU NEW CONSTRUCTION [?-' REPAIRS 0 EM MW rf&&Srjj� No . .......................................... owlqm........................ OR ............................ ................................. CONTRACT ............ ..... PERIM No. ADDREss /,�, C:Y) ....................................... I ............................................... LEGAL DESCRnMON: LOT ................................. BLOCK No . ............................................ NAME OF 9_ ............................................................................................. . ................ -- ------ ----- OTT OF EDMOND� Civic' CE_NTEkz_:;A�,A:.TER_SEWER -DEPARTMENT Call :-PROSPect 6-1107 when work is ready for inspection. (No,Jqspec_ tiOns Saturday, Sunday or h'� 0 SIOE SEWER PERMIT N: 2374, ADDRESS ...... 19.6.3.1 ... ..... 8.0.t.h ... P.1.a.ce ... We-s.t., ........... '1106. .... .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .... ..... .. .. .......................................... .............................................................. I ................ OWNER ......... �. A. ............. I .............................. I ................................ CONTRACTOR .... O�y c View Plumbin, ............... I ........................... R� .................. Permission is granted ............ June ... 29..2.7 ...... 19 .... 6.7, f or ................... " days I to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer with City Sewers in accordance With application 611 Me and governing ordinances. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING: NOTE No. I —The owners of the Property may obtain a Permit to Construct sewer inside property line. A licensed- Side Sewer Contractor must be employed to construct side sewer In street area. Do not cover any Portion of sewer before It has been Inspected. NO-- No. 2—Obtain full Information regarding Ordinance 11,16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at Property line and 12 inches inside property line; mInJmum grade of No bends In grade sharper th ' an % will be permitted. I�OTF. No. 4—Trenches In street must be watersettled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsib . le for I. failure due to improper work whi _ h may develop within one year of completion. NL tenances except to insert the Pipe into the wye. No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is Provided for In the Permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its appur- Z '; Z�� -- � " W 7�" " �11TY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS - EMINEERING ACTION REPORT 1522 SUSPENSE DATE: late: 9/14/82 —Time: 4:45 P.M. File# Attachments: =Yes iUBJECT: Water main leak. Radioed to water watch MNo at 4:45 p.m. Citizen indicated that I-e—aT-was sigiit:ed Thursday, 9/9, but sh " q_-did ilut: report: 1-int-il nr)w- 01,giri sbe wol-11d deriu.nt an amount from her bill this month. 1EQUESTOR: NAME: Mrs. Scott V 7 -Th ADDRESS: "FR X177Tsou"t 17,5 PHONE: -7 T4�-"M o _�7 78 1EQUEST RECEIVED BY: TELEPHONE M3 CONTACT IN OFFICE OTHER: RECEIVED BY ROLITF TO M. LeVan ACTION: All Concerned Notified Action Completed/File N.E. R4 '256 A 1940Z (940, 19 19333 t� Lt9331 001 0 — I 9105 19406 19407 19-10 ob 07 ro 19414 19415 -5— 194ru 3T i "I sr 19406 19409 — . & W. 10 19422 1942J N 194zl 19412 19,113 — Mm V, I -i , I I P. I ell, ca a 15* 19428 -- /9427 40%, r, p 1� " 195-00 -4 19501 OWA t4 02 03 1 9TO6 to- 19504 1Y.505 aO* 195019 016 07 196t q. 49511 195-09 19509 19515! co 10 11 .51 f, 9517 Oil I 9.f n- 1, � 4% 19513 c 00 an 13 52 _ I TH K 196 T. �Ov sk 'n 14ft 0 196.21 1% 21 9621 19620 19625 )9632 p 'T Vb — — ca c%j N W28 7 19628 19629 19638 19677 19621 196.27 in MONO 4. to 1970Z 19703 )9702 117os 19702 19701 197014 19703 1 709 �j cy I Me 117707 19708 )9707 19709 411 0 197/4 0— /171/ 98 19715 1972o 19719 19714 19723 J9 19714 19710 11719 19714 724 19721 igni 19721 V 197245 CL 19729 )03Q T,7;�,- %Z, 19724 11130 111�;V 19730 11004 19805 - * lqso� -J 1?807 198 19810 — — CA. 606 Igoe 1900 081, IVL8'—' 19912 /tell 19sm iveli "U "'A ftlo "a, 19812 19 PL. — — — — >. 4! 96 '3 19611 19819 19016 19217 19010 19823 I"ti 19RI 9 Z9 — — I Le 19819 19819 19824 19929 19026 co 19925 19829 �9927 196 — . — V., t, R, lieu 2r 19826 198 1983 )9832o- )9931 19832% 1h 19832 19901 "13 W! 1990611 11905 99os )9905 19906 ST S.W p In —co— CO 1"05 V to IT cm 10 199 9912 Igo$ ",I 1 1,90 v 1: 2 H914 Ims t9911 g 19920 f9922 19921 1"20 —00 r. 1"19 z 9927 J"28 9 2_5 L 200T14 TM S. W. z . ST -a cT 1 co I I r -4 1 . ;; ;& ;� go I I' 20006 IM 20016 Y0014 20017 20020 A0011 20019 20024 2002J 025 ZOOZ4 r, &D 0019 20021 K -7 0031 201 ST aw. 101 .2X3Y ZOiv2 20101 2003Z 700'0 20031 20 1 103 0033 20104 20110 V7 2DI12 3 20167 201// ZOI/4 zOli3 EF — � m 13 �7 1 31 T' Foils 20201 20124 ui ZOE09 > - 20209 Z020T 20206 20210 202(3 r- AS PLACE W2 m PL. R, 20207 20 24 Q ZOZ 01 2OZ01 cc to U � �24 "27 112 in 29 M W22 20301 Ct �C3 .4 , 0 237 LA ro 10 401. 0. n tzz� z W 3 OPE a ;6 - 31 Z03iz 323 :5 Avg S.W. �O 20 3 14 cp. *I all 20320 "4 203 204 TM ST SW 2'0331� 620324 PIN,c Memoir- 203 c XIDGE tA 20404 20410 W41, 20409 07 mob 040 �40,*4 k PARW 20415 �N, _ N 4 T"o 2 to e EKGVOOO CAre i it ZOM4 204 Z041 Is PL N — 0419 04 1 1.; 1 1511:1 5 'a SA PTI Vr co 2C47, LQ- 9— w to cmuncot 00 00 rA?4 2L1421 iz 0 STREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS HARVE Ff. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS December 8, 1982 Mr. Gary G. Hanada '. R.S. Environmental Health Specialist II Courthouse Everett, Washington 98201. Dear Mr. Hanada: SUBJECT: SEVERITY OF RODENTS I request your a.ssistance in handling a rodent problem located adjacent to,196'3-1 80th Place SouthwestrEdmonds. The owner of the possibi , erodent-infested area is Robert Gorman, 18610 88th Avenue West (telephone: 775-4973). Mr. Gorman at the present time has contracted Paramount Services, Inc. to bait his property located adjacent to 19631 80th Place South- west. I would like you to look at this property and determine how'I'Tiuch of a health hazard exists. I have attached all data for your information. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 771-3202. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Street Division Supervisor BRM: j kw Attachments <'�Rhda Marcl� dt. Mitchell/ dt. November 30, 1982 Bobby: Regarding your meeting with Mr. Handia.(?), I neglected to find out the following: 1) Where should this meeting be held? 2) What is it regarding? (He i ' ndicated that you mentioned ------s-omething-.ab.o-ut-19-6th.-.&--8.Oth.)-------------.—.--- We went aheadand made a tentative meeting time for Thursday, -----December-- 2;—at 9-:-O-O—a:.-m—.--I- tol-d—h-im-- you- wou-1-d --c-a-1-1--h-iM7tomorrow------ and advise him of the answers: -to the questions above. Thanks,'Bobby!! 0 STRELT'ALE * CITY OF EDMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS December 30, 1982 Mrs. - Scott ,19631-80th Pl. S.W.) Edmonds, WA_ 98020 Dear Mrs. Scott: SUBJECT: RODENT INFESTATION I Regarding your request of rodent infestation adjacent to your property, we have -done the following: 1. Contacted the legal owner for rodent control. This is presently being completed by Paramount Pest Control. 2. Able Pest Control inspected City storm sewers for any possible problems. 3. Contacted the Snohomish Health District for their appraisal to see if the property should be cleared. A copy of their report is attached. The City of Edmonds has complied with and pursued all legal avenues within our authority. If you should wish additional steps to be taken, it should be done strictly between you and the legal owner. If you should have any questions, please call Gary G. Hanada, Environmental Health Specialist II, Snohomish Health District at 259-9440. We thank you for your co- operation. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Street Division Supervisor BRM/ml 2__ 0 Enclosure HII�Ls DT MIZICHELL DT cc: John B. Mitchell, Supt. of Public Works Gary G. Hanada, Snohomish Health District CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DF— RTIVIENT SU:3j F C-T NAME WORK START NUMBER 16-1 DATE AND T1 ME SUMMARY" f4ke66,7n Wealq& g& E� TO TO TO TO 1 1 DATE [DATE JDATE IDATE DATE CITY OF EDMONDS MBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: LU 0 cm Uj SUSPENSE DATE: SUPERINTENDENT Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare I letter/memo for my signature For Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR BUILDINGS & GROUNDSDIV. SUPERVISOR EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIV. SUPERVISOR V STREET DIVISION SUPERVISOR V/1 WATER/SEWER DIVISION SUPERVISOR TREATMENT PLANT DIV. SUPERVISOR COMMENTS: 7 /7 FROM: DATE: 0 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT Courthouse Everett, Washington 98201 Area Code 206 259-9440 CLARIS HYATT, M.D., M.P.H. Health Officer DAVID A. STOCKTON, M.P.A. Executive Assistant DISTRICT MEMBERS COUNTY Snohomish CITIES AND TOWNS Arlington Brier Darrington Edmonds Everett Gold Bar Grani I a Falls Index Lake Stevens Lynnwood Marysville Monroe Mountlake T trace Mukilte Snohomish Stanwood Sultan Woodway December 14, 1982 Mr. Bobby R. Mills , - Street Division Supervisor City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 REC;U�i'- DO,.. 1982 Dir. 0 ublic worn .0 Re: Vacant Lot Adjacent to 19631-80th Place S.W., Edihonds Dear Mr. Mills: On December 2, 1982., a meeting was held with you at the above referenced site to determine the existence of a rodent infestation, as claimed by the compliant - ant. We walked some,of the site and at that time I did not notice any evidence which would indicate a large infestation at the site. We noted that poisoned bait stations were placed along the south fence line, by pest control personnel hired by the owner. This department has investigated three complaints dating back to June 18, 1982. Each occasion has resulted in little evidence to suggest a rodent infestation on the property. Also, you indicated that a survey of the neighborhood residences surrounding the lot indicated little evidence of a widespread problem. Upon reviewing the existing data it appears that we are ,vacant lot be cleared. The the present time appears to regulations and available unable to require that the action being taken at comply with our regulations. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, Gary G..H ada R.S. * m 1 kealth Specialist II Env*ronm2tal He GGH: j s f STREE f FILE 40 PARAMOUNT SERVICES, INC, SINCE 110,� 0 SEATTLE EITACOMA 0 EVERETT 423 S. HORTON 9321 S. TACOMA WAY 1323 BROADWAY SEATTLE, WA 98134 TACOMA, WA 98499 EVERETT, WA 98201 682-3456 584-5151 259-3228 CUSTOMER: BILLING ADDRESS TOLL -FREE (WA STATE) 1(800)542-0764 CONTACT SERVICE ADDRESS 0 V 19632 & 1.9631 80th Pl. SW. Edmonds, WA. 98020 GENERAL CONTRACTOR NUMBER PA-RA-MS-*342ME SERVICE ORDER 0 1'26 4 PHONE PROPOSAL F'OR ELIMINATION OF RODE�TS AT PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE SW JUNCTION OF 80TH &.196SW EDMONDS, WA. 1. Recommend placement of rodenticides in locked bait stations. This wbuld.limit the access to bait -by pets and children. Bait to be placed in crawl areas of homes. 'Also bait N. side of fence sep ar- ating open lot from the backyard areas of homes. 2. Alsolrecommend after duration of 90 days.baiting schedule, home owners effec.t-repai.rs to r,*odent-proof-homes. Screen all vents, crawl area covers, holes in siding', foundations, ect. 3. Having both of these recommendations been accomplished, open lot should be cleared.of shrubs, brush., vines, and other veg'a- tation that could be used as possible rodent harborage. WARRANTY PERIOD: -90 DAYS ALL MATERIAL IS GUARANTEED TO BE AS SPECIFIED. ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED IN A SUBSTANTIAL WORKMANLIKE MANNER ACCORD- ING TO SPECI FICATIONS SUBMITTED PER STANDARD PRACTICES. ANY ALTERATION OR DEVIATION FROM ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS INVOLV- ING EXTRA COSTS WiLL BE EXECUTED ONLY UPON WRITTEN ORDERS AND WILL BECOME AN EXTRA CHARGE OVER AND ABOVE THE QUOTATION. ALL AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES, ACCIDENTS OR DELAYS BEYOND OUR CONTROL. QUOTATION: 90 days/ 4 trips fnr.nppn I ot -------- $1 r;0 -on Ci)nt. fnr homps ------- $qQ_00 ench (SALES TAX ADDED WHERE REQUIRED BY LAW) TERMS: P,RICE SPECIFICATIO'N� AND CONbItIONS%A-Rit 'SA;T'IS.FACT : DRY AND OUR -HEREBY. ACCEPTED: YOU ARE �AUT,HOR IZED TO DO "THE WORK AStPEC[Fitb. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS'.'0UtL11'NEDAB'O' VE: ACCEPTANCE ACCEPTED BY DATE CUSTOMER TITLE '�PC 101-7/8*0 ORIGINAL BY Greg Clark PARAMOUNT SERVICES, INC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .j DATE N 'OUR TO L4 WHILeYOU WERE OUT M u OF PHONE.. TELEPHONED ,�IETURNED CALL LEFT PACKAGE PLEASE CALL WAS IN PLEASE Sit ME WILL CALL AGAIN WILL RETURN IMPORTANT MESSAGE I C e- C) a SIGNED LITTLE'S OFFICE SUPPLIES VHUNI: /UZ- luou - 1 0 0 STREEET FILE the Council overturned the Board's decision because "the facts had not been delved into and were sloppily presented." He said he considered that a cheap shot, but he noted that particular Councilmember was not present to answer for it. Mr. Mattson said he had been at that meeting and had many reasons why he thought that should pass, but he just observed and the only thing that recommended the Board's decision was the minutes. He said the staff introduced the subject and briefly told the Council what the Board thought, so if the Council does not read the minutes they have no idea why the reconTnendation is made. He noted that in the compact car parking issue the first recommendation went forward based on the minutes and the Council denied it, so the Board gave them evidence --they actually counted the cars. That time it was put on the Consent Agenda and was passed with a short discussion. He said the minutes, although adequately taken by the Clerk, are not enough to convince the Council, so he asked how they are to get the information to the Council to convince them that their reasons are valid. Mr. McGibbon suggested that possibly they should find a good pitch man as the new member of the Board, as somebody needs to draft a persuasive statement as to what the Board has found. He said the Planning Board will have to develop that resource, and possibly it is a matter of somebody getting together with the staff. Councilmember Gould requested that the Planning Board provide input in writing to the Council prior to the December 21 meeting, and also that anybody else who has ideas do so, in order to help the procedure work better. Mr. Hodgin asked if the Board could anticipate having the vacancies filled in the near future, noting that it wou-ld lose two more members shortly. He was told they will not be appointed before the December 21 meeting as the Council is making an effort to make changes to support and improve the whole system. AGENDA R-5-82 CITY OF EDMONDS - Preannexation zoning request for RS-8 zoning in the vicinity of th Ave. W. and 236th St. S.W. (Edmonds Village Estates and including Woodway High School) Mr. Bowman identified the area on a vicinity map. It includes approxi- mately 52.11 acres and has four existing single family residences, with another 20 under construction. Six duplexes also are being built. Woodway High School is proposed to be included in this annexa- tion. Woodway High School is also included in another proposed annexa- tion. It is needed to make this area contiguous to the City of Edmonds, so if it does not first become a part of the City as a part of the other annexation it will continue to be included in this annexation. Surrounding development to the east, west, and south is single family residential, and to the north is a nonconforming automobile junkyard. The area is zoned RR-9600 and RR-8400 in Snohomish County, with RR- 8400 to the north, south, and east, and RR-9600 to the west. The proposed annexation area is being developed as a PRO (Edmonds Village Estates), with average lot sizes of approximately 6,850 sq. ft. Mr. Bowman reviewd the rezone criteria. As to consistency with the Compre- hensive Plan, he said the Comprehensive Policy Plan map designates the area as Public Facilities and Low Density Residential. The proposed zoning does not appear to conflict with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance or the RS-8 zone district. As to relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property, he said the subject area is developed to a density consistent with the proposed zoning. PRDs are allowed in RS zones but attached units are presently not allowed in PRDs. The six duplexes will be considered pre-existing uses. The proposed zoning is consistent with the types of surrounding residential uses. Upon annexation the area must be given an appropriate classification, and that proposed is comparable to its former County designation --which is City policy. With the exception of the attached units in the PRO the proposed RS-8 zoning is comparable to those uses allowed in the RR-8400 zone, and economically and physically the property is suitable for those uses allowed. The proposed zoning change will cause no significant adverse impact on the property values in the annexation area. Also, a declaration PLANNING BOARD Page 4 - November 10, 1982 - 1 0 0 of nonsignificant adverse environmental impact has been issued. The Staff previously had recommended that the zoning for the Woodway High School site be RS-8 but the Planning Board felt this area should be zoned Open Space. In researching other similar types of rezone actions it was found that when the City rezoned the old Edmonds Elementary School (now the Anderson Center) the Planning Commission had recommended that the playfield portion be zoned Open Space, so based on the previous concerns of the Planning Board and the action taken on the elementary school , the Staff's recommendation for this annexation was that the Edmonds Village Estates area be zoned RS-8 and that the Woodway High School site be zoned RS-8 for the developed area and Open Space for the playfield. That would allow the high school buildings to continue as RS-8 which is an allowed use, and if the school should close and another school purchased the property that would allow them to do any expansion as a school. Mr. Bowman stated, in answer to a question, that it would be possible for the school to be razed and the owners come back with a subdivision. He also noted that in the development as proposed there are six lots that are duplex lots although four have been developed as RS-8 lots. He said the deielopment was approved with no problem as a PRO. The question was asked as to whether those lots approved as duplex lots.could later be developed into duplexes even though they now have been developed as RS-8 lots. City Attorney Mark Eames said he would have to research that. He noted that this is a special situation, being a PRO for which a particular kind of development has been approved and recorded with the County. He said the developer of the PRO would have rights vested to build that PRO which has been approved, and he would have to research what can happen subsequently down the road. He said a PRD is recorded with the County and is limited to what it shows. The hearing was opened. John McGrail, 9819 237th Pl. W., on the Board of Governors of the homeowners association of this PRD, and also an employee of Bob Pantley, the developer, said the PRD was started by Panterra and later was sold to Pantley's, Inc., and he said if they were to do it over again they would develop it as single family but at the time it was started they were not sure what the market would be. He said 22 of the 26 have been sold under earnest agreements, and he did not foresee anymore duplexes being built nor did he foresee any conversion of those single family homes to duplexes. He noted that there are several acres of open space in the PRO and he would prefer that they stay open space and not become RS-8 as he would not like to see someone else get control of the homeowners' association and sell those as lots. Mr. Eames said the project was approved with that as open space and was recorded and the PRD would continue in effect if it were annexed by the City. Mr. McGrail said it had been filed as OS in perpetuity and he thought that was as good protection as any in preventing building, although no one could be sure what may happen in the far future. Mr. McGrail said everyone he had talked to regarding police protection and taxes had been in favor of the annexation. He said they had a break- in of one of ' the homes under construction on Halloween and they had notified the Sheriff's Department and were told someone would come in two or three hours. Evelyn Fowler, living on Lot 13, said she had heard that in the Planning office they are planning to cut the trees down in the PRO and do an improved park. She said it is all in wilderness and fully grown fir trees which gives them an excellent buffer against dirt, dust. and noise. She was also concerned about houses being constructed in the school area which she said would result in over -construction. She was assured that there was no intent to remove the trees and Mr. McGrail advised her that a covenant has been recorded requiring that this piece of property be maintained in its natural condition. Joe Callyer, property owner on 100th Ave. said he opposed the annexation for several reasons. He was concerned about fire response and asked PLANNING BOARD Page 5 - November 10, 1982 what would happen to the junk yard across the street and why it was not included to do something about it. Mr. Bowman responded that it is the County's position that it is a pre-existing nonconforming use and can continue in operation as long as it does not expand. Nothing is being done to put it out of business, and Mr. Bowman said the City has no control over who applied in the 10% petition, but it basically was the Edmonds Village Estates in this case, and the high school was included as a contiguous area. He said if the owner of the junk yard wanted to apply he would have been included. Mr. Eames advised Mr. Callyer that this hearing was primarily concerned with the zoning and that there will be a Council hearing on the other questions. Mr. McGrail added that Mr. Pantley has tried four times to by the junk yard area but the owner will not sell it at this time. He said that the property purchased for the development was originally one large piece, including the area now cut into a triangle and separated from the development by the road. I Joe Dwyer, 529 Holly Dr., asked where the proposed annexation joins the City and when Mr. Bowman demonstrated it on the vicinity map Mr. Dwyer said he did not think it proper to have a little isolated piece of property annexed. No one else wished to speak, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Eames cautioned the Board that anytime they proposed changing the zoning substantially from what it was they should try to make very definite findings because in any court action the City has the burden of proving that the change in the zoning is warranted. Mr. McGibbon observed that it appeared that RS-8 was consistent with the surrounding area and the development that has gone on, and he saw no reason to change that. As far as making the playfield Open Space he found that consistent with what had seen in other parts of Edmonds, and he thought zoning the playfield Open Space would keep that as a desirable feature of the neighborhood. Mr. Mattson said the six duplexes would be considered pre-existing uses in the RS-8 zone, but the Code states there will be no common walls in a PRO, so he asked why not take them into the City as an RM-3 duplex zone. Mr. McGibbon said it seemed to him that duplex zoning is an exception so you would honor the prevailing use. He asked if there was any reason to bring this in as an RM zone. Mr. Mattson said if they were to put a desirable zoning on the junk yard to the north it would expedite the selling of that property and remove an eyesore. He said there are businesses which buy property right on the edge of the City and want to do something but cannot if they are a part of the City , so they do it under the County's laws and then apply for annexation to the City. Mr. McGibbon said the alternatives are to say the City does not like some of the nonconforming uses so the property will not be allowed into the City; but the option is to say the City will make the nonconforming conditions a rule and allow it. Mr. Mattson asked why not welcome those into the City as duplex zones as they are, and he said there are two duplexes there now and zoning them RS-8 will not make them go away. Mr. McGibbon said the testimony was heard of one gentleman who said he does not like duplexes there, and the predominant theme is that. He said if the City does not want the duplexes it will deny the annexation. He did not think it made much sense to recommend that the minority use be sanctioned. Mr. Eames said it would be difficult to support zoning a specific lot differently from another. Mr. Mattson thought the six lots which were duplex zoned should be brought into the City as duplex lots, and Mr. McGibbon said the PRD action fixes the use for that drea. He did not know what was to be gained by bringing those lots in as duplex. Ms. Block noted that they were overlooking the fact that the density on a PRD is overall what the underlying zoning is --in this case 8400, and these are not duplex lots developed at duplex density, and the underlying density is still 8400, regardless of common walls. Therefore, to bring it in as a duplex zone would change that density. Mr. Mattson stated that two duplexes are being included in an RS-8 zone which is against the Code. MR. McGIBBON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. PLANNING BOARD Page 6 - November 10, 1982 HODGIN, TO APPROVE R-5-82 WITH RS-8 ZONING FOR THE SUBJECT AREA EXCEPT THAT THE WOODWAY PLAYFIELD BE DESIGNATED OPEN SPACE, AND TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS OF THE STAFF. MOTION CARRIED. A recess followed. CDC-13-82 CITY OF EDMONDS - Amendment to Chapter 16.20.010(B) of the Community Development to allow accessory units ("mother-in-law") in single family zones with a Conditional Use Permit and to add a new Chapter 20.21 regulating accessory units. Mr. Bowman read aloud the proposed new chapter. He said he had done some quick revisions to add some of the things that the Planning Board was concerned about and he had obtained the information requested regarding UBC requirements for accessory units. He said it does not specifically address mother-in-law apartments but it does discuss efficiency dwelling units. fie provided the additional criteria regarding accessory apartment units. Mr. McGibbon noted that one question which had arisen had to do with, the idea olf.whether a unit should be in existence for a number of years -before it is eligible for conversion. Mr. Bowman responded that the proposal required owner occupancy so a developer,could not develop such units as apartment type units, but if the Board felt there should be such a restriction it could be included. Mr. McGibbon said the main reason would be to calm the fears of people who might oppose this on grounds th�t it provides too tempting a loophole to a developer. Mr. Hodgin said he would like to see a restriction that there not be any outside structure added, but other Board members commented that there is nothing to keep an owner from remodeling to make a place larger. Chairman Sittauer reminded the Board that there will not be many in the City who will use this, but he added that if a builder has that potential he will do it. Mr. Mattson stated that the new Code should reflect that this provision is for the benefit of older people --if that is what it is. Mr. McGibbon stated that it is an attempt to make more housing available and at the same time moderate the expense of housing to any number of people without damaging the so-called single family character of the neighborhood. Mr. Bowman reviewed the last Board discussion of this item, and he noted that the element of only one utility meter may discourage some people. The hearing was opened, no one wished to speak, and the hearing was closed. Mr. McGibbon felt that the proposal met a need which he perceived some people have, and he said experience indicated that where this sort of thing has been enacted there has not been a large percentage of people using it, but for those who are interested he thought it met a real need. He thought there were adequate safeguards in the proposal to protect the community and that each would be reviewed. He noted that some things cannot be realistically handled in an ordinance, but he thought it would be a waste of time to try to incorporate all the details in an ordinance, and he was satisfied with the provisions that the Mayor had suggested, along with the fact that he thought it would be a good idea to limit it to housing that has been occupied for three years. MR. McGIBBON THEREFORE MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HODGIN, TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT SUCH AN ORDINANCE BE ENACTED BECAUSE HE THOUGHT THERE TO BE SOME PEOPLE WHO CAN USE THIS, AND BECAUSE HE THOUGHT IT WOULD NOT DAMAGE THE SINGLE FAMILY CHARACTER OF A NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT LIMITING IT TO ONE UNIT PER BUILDING AND RESTRICTING IT TO AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AND NOT ALLOWING IT IN A GARAGE; FURTHER, THAT ONLY ONE ELECTRIC AND WATER METER BE PERMITTED, THAT THREE OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES BE REQUIRED, AND THAT THE STRUCTURE BE OWNER OCCUPIED. He thought that to be a sensible and workable set of requi rements. Mr. Bowman stated that Chapter 16.10 would be amended and this would be a permitted secondary use if it meets the criteria of the new Chapter 20.21 which requires the staff to conduct a public hearing. Mr. McGibbon noted that staff hearings are held in the daytime whereas the Hearing Examiner had hearings in the evening, so PLANNING BOARD Page 7 - November 10, 1982 CIA W 00 k!) STREET FILE C-15, . CITY �DF F-0molimm, HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS , �e. �.� � �Av October 13, 1982 AAA Glass Incorporated 1860i Highway 99 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Attention: Mrs. Scott Dear Mrs. Scott: SUBJECT: RODENT CONTROL Enclosed please find a copy of Paramount Pest Control's recommendation regarding the rodent problem located next to your property. Paramount Pest Control sent a copy of the recommendation to Mr. Gorman and as soon as he notifies me of his decision, I will contact you. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at 771-3202. BRM: j kw Enclosure (--� pollwlroel-- Rh-o�a) March / f / dt. Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Street Division Supervisor . 0 / n / 6/ Ls� JaP�--Mit6nell at. 'IMPORTAraf.M.ES�1 4GE), (I PA P_P R,,T A ri, rr AA E S,. 4 FOR FOR. Arm. 0, P.M.. AC, TIME DATE TIME DATE P*ia� 6# m 61 pp TOT` OF — OF, PHONE AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION PHONE, AREA CODE NUMBER' EXTENSIO TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL, CAME TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH RETURNED YOU R CALL SPECIAL ATTENTION TELEP HONED PLEASE CALL < CAME TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU RUSH RETURNED YOUR CALL SPECIAL ATTENTION GE MESSAGE., MESSA Xl, AIL -1 0.0 c -1,41 > -4 Co SIGN 0.1-' lo E PIN jy . A.: S. ` b- -ELF, n TOPS FORM'3002P 4 U) 9. U) (D 4 (D cn C '0 '0 U) CD Ni in cp < �n C, J, 0 J 1 0 E SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT M. WARD HINDS, M.D., III Health Officer DISTRICT MEMBERS COUNTY Snohomish CITIES AND TOWNS Arlington Brier Darrington Edmonds Everett Gold Bar Granite Falls Index Lake Stevens Lynnwood Marysville Mill Creek Monroe Mountlake Terrace Mukilteo Snohom ish Stanwood Su It a n Woodway SNOHOMISH, HEALTH DISTRICT Courthouse Everett, WA 98201 GENERAL INFORMATION 339-5200 ADMINISTRATION 339-5210 MAINCLINIC 339-5220 TUBERCULOSIS CLINIC 339-5225 PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING 339-5230 CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SERVICES 339-5240 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 339-5250 FOOD PROGRAM 339-5260 SANITATION PROGRAM 339-5270 VITALSTATISTICS 339-5280 SOUTH COUNTYCLINIC 775-3522 EAST COUNTY CLINIC 793-0201 April 14, 1988 119CEIVED Bobby R. Mills Superintendent of Public Works APR 151988 City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue West %OLIC WORKS Edmonds, Washington 98020 Subject: Rat Complaint / 80th Place West and 196th Dear Mr. Mills: I am writing in response to your letter of March 30, 1988, addressed to Gary Hanada with this office, concerning a rat complaint from the above noted location. Around March 21, 1988, 1 had a phone conversation with a resident who lives adjacent to the vacant lot. She expressed concern regarding possums which apparently inhabit the property, and wanted us to get rid of them. I told her they are harmless animals and, as the health district, could not eliminate them. I asked if she was sure they were possums and not rats. She indicated she was, then asked what we would do about rats. I outlined our program which is essentially public education, and that due to funding do not have traps or poison available. She indicated she would contact the city animal control officer. On March 23, 1988, 1 received a complaint from the resident concerning rats coming from the lot. I visited the property shortly thereafter and walked over most of it. I did not see any indications of rats, however there were some large burrows. These are too large for rats and likely dug by possums or other burrowing animals. Furthermore, I did not see any garbage or other food sources which might attract rats. I contacted the resident by phone and told her of my findings. She indicated she had seen possums, raccoons, and rats from the property and, wanted something done. I explained our sole concern would involve the rats, and indicated I could hand out an informational flyer to residents (copy enclosed). She indicated she had seen one, wasn't too interested since they required the homeowner to eliminate the problem and would call the mayor. 0 0 Subject: Rat Complaint / 80th Place West and 196th April. 14, 1988 Page 2 I recently visited the area and handed out my rat informational flyer to nearby residents and questioned those who were home. No one indicated seeing any rats, nor had they heard of any of their neighbors seeing them. However, several did indicate seeing possums and raccoons. I visited the complainant's home and offered to look around her yard for rodent signs. She wasn't too interested, stressing the problem was the field and that burrows could be seen. I emphasized I had seen large burrows, but not any which would be common to rats. I talked to a male resident of the home who indicated he had not seen any rats, but thought his neighbor to the west had. That person was not home, but I did leave a flyer at that residence. Aside from the complainant no one, including the resident of her home, has confirmed a rat problem. The flyer I passed out has my name and phone number and invites people to contact me. To date, no one has called. Of the conversations with the complainant, she has emphasized possums the most. While rats are present in Snohomish County, I have been unable to confirm a problem at this location. I have made information available to residents, and am willing to offer assistance to eliminate identifiable problems. Should there be further questions, please contact me at 339-5250. Sincerely, oo David N. Compton, R.S. Environmental Health Specialist III DNC:sei Enclosures 0 0 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT M. WARD HINDS, M.D., M.P.H Health Officer DISTRICT MEMBERS COUNTY Snohomish CITIES AND TOWNS Arlington Brier Darrington Edmonds Everett Go Id Bar Granite Falls Index Lake Stevens Lynnwood Marysville Mil I Creek Monroe Mountlake Terrace Mukilteo Snohom ish Stanwood Sultan Woodway SNOHOMISH, HEALTH DISTRICT Courthouse Everett, WA 98201 GENERAL INFORMATION 339-5200 ADMINISTRATION 339-5210 MAINCLINIC 339-5220 TUBERCULOSIS CLINIC 339-5225 PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING 339-5230 CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SERVICES 339-5240 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 339-5250 FOOD PROGRAM 339-5260 SANITATION PROGRAM 339-5270 VITAL STATISTICS 339-5280 SOUTH COUNTY CLINIC 775-3522 EAST COUNTY CLINIC 793-0201 To: Property owners and Residents From: David N. Compton, R.S. Environmental Health Specialist III Subject: Rat Activity Recently there has been concern about rat activity in your neighborhood. Since this is a problem which can only be corrected by neighborhood cooperation, the following items should be checked for every residence on the block. All garbage should be stored in rode nt-resistant containers with tight- fitting lids. Plastic garbage bags are not sufficient. Garbage should be removed to a County approved disposal site at least once a week. 2 ) Compost piles should be covered with a layer of soil if food items (such as fruit or vegetable peelings) are deposited. 3 ) Pet foods should not be left out at night and should be stored in rodent - proof containers. 4 ) Dog droppings should be picked up frequently and bird feeders should be rat -proofed. 5 ) Any opening allowing access into your home (i.e. cracks in the foundation, openings around pipes, windows, etc.) should be well sealed or screened with 1/4 inch wire mesh. 6 ) Rats should be destroyed as deemed necessary by either trapping or poisoning. Please ask for advice or assistance if you are unfamiliar with these techniques -- poisons and traps can be hazardous if improperly used. Thank you, and please feel free to contact me at 339-5250 if you have any questions. 061087 0 4) SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT M. WARD HINDS, M.D., M.P.H Health Officer DISTRICT MEMBERS COUNTY Snohomish CITIES AND TOWNS Arlington Brier Darrington Edmonds Everett Gold Bar Granite Falls Index Lake Stevens Lynnwood Marysville Mill Creek Monroe Mountlake Terrace Mukilteo Snohom ish Stanwood Sultan Woodway SNOHOMISH, HEALTH DISTRICT Courthouse Everett, WA 98201 GENERAL INFORMATION 339-5200 ADMINISTRATION 339-5210 MAIN CLINIC 339-5220 TUBERCULOSIS CLINIC 339-5225 PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING 339-5230 CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S SERVICES 339-5240 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 339-5250 FOOD PROGRAM 339-5260 SANITATION PROGRAM 339-5270 VITAL STATISTICS 339-5280 SOUTH COUNTY CLINIC 775-3522 EAST COUNTY CLINIC 793-0201 Subject: Rat Activity Recently there has been concern about rat activity in your neighborhood. Since this is a problem which can only be corrected by neighborhood cooperation, the following items should be checked for every residence on the block. 1) All garbage should be stored in rodent -resistant containers with tight -fitting lids. Plastic garbage bags are not sufficient. Garbage should be removed to a County approved disposal site at least once a week. 2) Compost piles should be covered with a layer of soil if food items (such as fruit or vegetable peelings) are deposited. 3) Pet foods should not be left out at night and should be stored in rodent -proof containers. 4) Dog droppings should be picked up frequently and bird feeders should be rat -proofed. 5) Any opening allowing access into your home (i.e. cracks in the foundation, openings around pipes, windows, etc.) should be well sealed or screened with 1/4 inch wire mesh. 6) Rats should be destroyed as deemed necessary by either trapping or poi I soning. Please ask for advice or assistance if you are unfamiliar with these techniques __ poisons and traps can be hazardous if improperly used. Thank you, and please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 339-5250 if you have any questions. [IM119M STREET-) FILE rE::. May 18, 1981 JUN 8 19ffl Dir. Of Public Works City of Edmonds 250 5th Ave. N. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 F I �Lg- I This letter is in reference to the proposed building of apartments on the lot behind"`l963`l80th Place W. Edmonds. The residents of 19631 80th Place W.,,James J. Scott and family, have been living at this address for thirteen years with no water problems with the storm sewer behind their house. If said building of apartments causes water problems due to damage or inaccessability to the storm sewer, the residents of 19631 80th Place W., James J. Scott and family hold the city of Edmonds fully responsible. - Sincerely, James J.- Scott 19631 80th Place W. Edmonds, Wa. 98020 JS/db