19808 77TH PL W (3).PDF111111111111
6543
19808 77TH PL W
P"Mr-1797 M1,17. iRFT
'�6`3
City... of Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT Permit Number.
Issue Date:
A. Address. or Vicinity of Construction: 1,10,70j,- :z �7*'-�;;:,/,
B. Type of Work (be specifi
C. c): --tea
Contact:
C. Contractor:
L—vt - I iii - V - M I —_ -
Mailing Addr'ess: P 0 R ,,3 6' L?& I_ _ - I Q Phone:
�1' I — I' IUA
j2i� T- Liability 1��ran_c*et: Bond:
State'License #:
an
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
".X, — j! I � -1
ivision n City Project E] Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE,IWATER)
0 Multi -Family Family E] Other
�PR ",INSPECTOR:
INSPEOF V) Ll I T,
Pavement or Concrete Cut: 171 Yes 91No
G. Size of Cut: x H. Charee $
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or *description whatsoever,.foreseen or:unforese�,n, that.ma'y be made. against the. City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
emp*loyees,4ncluding o� not limited tdthe. defense of ahy. legal proceedin incl ding defense c
osi.s and attoirne.�Jep by reason:'of granting thisper'mit.
gs _u
THE CONTk4Ciibl? IS RESPONSIBLE FOR:*ORRMANSHIP AND. MA TER , JA I IS - FOR-4 I PERIOD OF ONE . YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC�
TION AND ACCEPTANct 6F.THE WORK. ESTIMA TED RESTOPA TION'FEE9. WILL�BE HELD ONTIL TlJE FINAL STREET PA TCH�]S COMPLETED
BYCITYFORCES, AT'WHICH'TIMEA DEBITOR CREDITWILL BEPROCESSEDF6RISSUANCE TO THEAPPLICA . NT. ,
Two sets �f construction-Arawings of proposed work'required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for' inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.
Work and, m'a'terial is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration is t6be,in accordance';with City Codes.
Street shall be kept,".dlean at all times.
Traffic C6ntrol an8`Public Safety n acco'rdance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
shall be i
All,st'reet,cut trench Work shal.1-66patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day;.
NO LKCEPTIONS
Phdve read the abov� siatemeA67and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be
ai;.ailable bn site! at,��,fitimesfor in ectionpurposes.
�p
S ature.. Date:
ign
(&nrr5c9V0r Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY FEE: 30
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I 11:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: P9,9, i z RESTORATION FEE:
T OTAL FEE: 3D �
RECEIPT NO.:
ISSUED BY.:
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES NO
Partial Work Inspection by"P.W.,:,
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:.
NOTICE:
NoWarranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
empl-oyee-s or. officers shall be lia-b-l-e for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
COY OF EDMONDS
Call PROSPeet 6-1107 when work
CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT is ready for inspection. (No inspee-
SIDESEWER PERMIT Onus Saturday, Sunday or holidays.) N2 2059
19808 - 77th Place West
ADDRESS--------- ----------------- . ...... I ..................
Philip E. Borders Russell Johnson
OWNER................................ '"R
......................................................... . ... CONTRAC ....... . .......................................................................
April 20, 67
Permission is granted ................................. ........... 19 ......... for ........................ days to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
with City Sewers in accordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. I —The owners of the Property may obtain a Permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
be employed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any portion of sewer before it has been inspected.
NOTE No. 2—Obtaln full information regarding Ordinance 11.16.030 and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
NOTE No. 3—Top of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches Inside property line; minimum grade of 2
No bends in grade shaxper than % will be permitted.
No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
NOTE No. 5—It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for In the permit, or to do any work on the main sewer or its apPur-
tenances except to Insert the pipe Into the wye.
, "I
APPLICATION
for
--Tbe- City of Edmonds Im"M rM a VW SEDE SEWER PERMIT
7 '51FIE-c i twLt NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS
,��ro %
0
LYWN PLANT
BASEMENT No . ..........................................
. ...... CONTRACTOR
�0 7. Y ....... 'r" PERMIT. No.
OWNER ---- / x I .............. A�� ...... ---- )Py.sell .......
ADDRESS .............. 72..,P& .... ............. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . ......
. ............................. BLOCK No . .................... .......................
NAME OF ADDITION ... 2n--�CIIWO.d .. 0 ............ .....
0
-'ll 6�
APpROVED
A4 2 0 1561
rz� -�,7
g,g
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ....................................................................
PLANNING DATA
NAME:- W,�)5kb,,
SITE ADDRESS: 198'0& - -17 r-- P1. Q, —DATE: - 2-1171�9
ZONING: PLAN CHK#:- 6o- 2- 9
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Mb__1Xnq, 50
CORNERLOT Al (Yes/No) FLAG LOT. A)- —(Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 2-5' Left Side: 7 Right Side: 7�z Rear:
Actual Setbacks: H—je 4 7, 5-
Front: 3i I Left Side: Vic Right Side: Rear: ;?-6'
Street map checked for additional 7% le bTa'*cVr e q u i r e d ? Alb Yes/No)
(C_4,L'� s�c )
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N)
110), S- V'fc'�
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: 35-17. —Actual: C), 5b 2- 10 5b
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed:— ;? 5' ----.Actual Height: No (22Lr4
Datum Point: Datum Elevation: I 0o, (z
A.D.U. CREATED?: 4. Lv� �, A., e (4,
CRITICALAREAS#: 97-V'- WA-V?/"
SEPA DETERMINATION:
LOT AREA: to, 5z2,' t, i�e, 10, 7 3 9 0 Abc- 4*
OTHER: it V-- q 7 - 1 (3 4,P-9-7- 0& k4s bnq
__'1
Plan Review By:
cAfileeyenniAAplandadoc
f
/'Per Oferw) 6� I \-
Z- fr X Y- 52. x a rH) � -s 2 r-7- 3
6�r4*vprg-o .1, ge-MOUCzL7 95-2. 4 5-Z 1,0,,4 C,3-
y a
IlVe-106-AJ74L 4,-Ye-4VA-TlDl-J 0- 1p6P-fMr=-7-6A llaFll' 60 lc;p IZ
��IAJA Z. & rz A P f- 57 7 f�?- /-- 4 Z-F e- FT ;
e, 7 -7 F 7' 5/ Y,9 I / AA:-, 9,Aj
J A N
I-FE- PL,&- t-4
LO-r 4 t2- SAWDLEW0,39 V I U'02- 6LK 000 - C) - Oo - t-orwI2-
TAX. A640-0-T : 15t, 4 o -,-Oeo - o / 2 - ;Poo
13
STRE-ET FILE
PLANNING DATA
NAME -
SITE ADDRESS:- DATE: —
ZONING: PLAN CHK#: 7 - �9
gv_
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CORNER LOT IL119 (Yes/No)
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 2!%' Left Side: -7 Right Side: Rear: (5
Actual Setbacks:
Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear:
Street map checked for additional setback required? —(Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED (Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height: —
Datum Point: Datum Elevation: (00
A.D.U. CREATED?:
SUBDIVISION:
CRITICAL AREAS
0)7-9ff -u)Aive1z_
SEPA DETERMINATION: Ey 6 . P-r .
LOT AREA:
OTHER:
Plan. Review By:
04),14,
OfileApamiPplandat.doc
CA FILE NO.
Critical Areas Checklist
--------------------------------------------------------------
.Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
1. Site Address/ Location: /14`6f - 2 7 10%5?� A� 04,#-/ d 0-�
2. Property Tax Account Number: S-6 �/e 0e — C 1A - e e c
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed? Xyes; no.
2 1097
Jf yes; how is site developed? 5M, /r
5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
X - Flat: less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % (a vertical
rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over
a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: IVV ; Approx. Depth:
7.
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water:
What season(s) of the year? NA
)VO . Approx. Depth: —
8. Site is in the floodway 41 . 01 floodplain Xv of a water course.
9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are
year-round? )VO Flows are seasonal? *'o (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: A1,0
-----For City. Staff. Use:Only
1. Site is Zoned?
2. SCS mapped soil, type(s)? -JV�4
3. Wetland inventory or C.A. map indicates wetland present on site?
4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates. Critical. A.rea.pn.site?
5..:�: Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?' I&k
6.' Site designated on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas.,Map?,. Pja
bittERMINATION
A ca_chk.doc; Rev 02/11/97
City of Edmonds
1W CRITICAL AREAS CHECKLIST
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is
to be filled out by any person preparing a
Development Permit Application for the City of
Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of a development
permit to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, -or
may be, present on the subject property. The
information needed to complete the Checklist should
be easily available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories,
maps, or soil surveys).
! I
0 'Vi I . .
An applicant, or his/her representative, must fill out
the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the
City. The City will review the checklist ' make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map along with the signed
copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and
locating the specific piece of property described on
this form. In addition, the applicant shall include
other pertinent information (e.g., site plan, topography
map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
to assist staff in completing their preliminary
assessment of the site
I have completed the attached Critical Areas Checklist and attest that the answers provided are factual, to the
best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner/Applicant:
IL I
Name
1'_a-v'e - s;, k/V`/"'
Street Address
CM P J r 0 1 U/S� /i 1 0'. � I , e7tfe."
city State Zip
�1 -5-- ) 7 5/— _-) Y e
Telephone'—\
Signature
AA
Date
c:rcception\jana\cac1.doc
Applicant Representative:
Name
Street Address
City State Zip
Telephone
Signature
Date
(over)
'zic. 1891)
�)Ji4tL
/ 9 90 5 7 7 -'�;e 13-L. (-J
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Public Works * Planning/Building e Parks and Recreation * Engineering * Wastewater Treatment Plant
Junel,1998
To: Home/Business owner - Plan Check # V-1yY'
From; City of Edmonds Building Division
Re: Adoption of 1997 Uniform Building Codes, Energy Codes and Ventilation Codes
Please note, as of July 1" 1998 the City of Edmonds will adopt the 1997 Uniform
o
Building, Energy and Ventilation Codes. In order f or your project to be vested
under the current 1994 codes your permit must either. be iss ued no later than June
30th, 1998 or you must pay your outstanding permit fees prior to the adoption of
the new code (by June 301h, 1998 5pm). In order to vest your application you may
come down to the Building Division Monday through Friday from 9-5pm to pay your
fees or pick up your permit (if we have called to tell you it is ready for issuance).
If you do not vest your project under the 1994 codes by paying your f ees or picking
up your permit by June 30th, your plans will be sent back to the Plans Examiner for
re -review under the 1997 codes and a new plan review fee will be assessed
regardless if the plans have already been approved.
Thank
y
Lara Knack
Permit Coordinator
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
L�*'_ . e4
ey d UN-
-1 y;d el p� ,y no*..'z��,'4j5
4 16 this site: &iiientl
-0 .es;,
n r_61' 'All
yes; I bw is gifi�'&Velop ed?,. 'k
e ge- `phy:,_Ch�ck all th�iapp�y.
S. "Dd-s m'*be* th nera.1 site to�ogra
�'Jj 4
Flat:,,.. less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling:
Hilly:
Steep:
slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a
horizontal distance of 66-feet).
slopes present on site of more than 15 % and less than 30 % (a vertical -
rise of 10-fee't over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over -.i
a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe):
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: 4/0 ; Approx. Depth:
.7. - Site contdm areas of seasonal standing water: - //40 ' Approx.'Depth*- '" '
on(S) of the Year?,
8. Site is'in the floodway—A/-L—" floodplain--Yo
of a water course.
I Mal
fill -
dc co, 0 ig ffcant;'-'�.Or� er, repr
ti dc St. e&' VV out�
be4llled, -',by,,`,,e any, . --perso jT th 'jan&date:
:jo 4-out,.'. n 'preparing*hy� e#-bhecklist,,':.1,si mif-ft -the
Rl 1, M
-D 7,� :.-70.,
0 W,:J
eyelo -Xi" off.4.,-,Cit -:�Ci IL,re
ty,-� ty Wi vie �m' e,T,
plll�, y,
ice
FAnioinds prior to- his/her submittal of a:,d6@6pment,.-,. preCili�ijry.--site,-�isit,',Ahd in" a-' 'de
iary MPI I
x_. 'ju, I'M sequent itipsxndces to'do" a,deve opment-,
permit to the City.%, ��J_ b ete'
Uwation
The heckI -City staff to�..`�-*-vPlease submit a vicinity map along with, the -signed
.purpose of thet ist.is. toenable
determine, Aithei�'a'ny" "Criti r cal, Are 'f..
potential as are, or., copy o Us foh� to.. assist City staff in -finding and
may, - be, . present on' the subj ed'"p eriy�.'..�`! - The'locating the specific' piece of property described on
informatio'n,.n6eded t -'complete, -the �Checklist'fghould': lhis�,.fdhii In' -addition, th6'applicant. shall. include
o er peitinent'information (e.g., site plan, topography
be easily available from observations of the "siid "' 61'�-i'.': ' th ' ' '
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, map, etc.) or studies in conjunction with this Checklist
m aps s-oil'surveys)".- as ist staff in . completing their preliminary
or to s
assessment of the site
1�1j.A
,J have 'compiet6dihe,itta6ed Critical Ai��_'Checklist that the a n*swers* provided ar:e tiauai,,to ihe%.
11 out the. appropriate'co umn 11:�low). �:
i�slt'o_fm"'Y knowledge' 0 1
Owner/Applicant: 'Applicant Representative:
WhAll,
Name
/ I S'S_U—,FV6 PI
Street Address
city State zip
7 3/—
Tele
,/p�h�e
Signature
A.
Date
Name
Street Address
City., State Zip
Telephone
-Signature
Date
(over)
.C:MkCePd0nVana%=1.doc,
I, � , - . � ; ;, . -�
�C's t . 1 'a 9 --)
Date:
To:
Subject:
Transmitting
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Pvblic Works e Planning * Parks and Recreation Engineering
Letter of Transmittal
June 197 1997
Winston G. Whall
Critical Areas Checklist
Copy of the completed Critical Areas Checklist
For Your Information:
XX
As you requested:
For your file:
-xx
Comment:
This completed Critical Areas Checklist is a
site specific determination, not a project
specific determination. You must bring in a
copy of the completed critical areas checklist
with any permit application, or your
application will be rejected. Permit
applications include Building permits,
Conditional Use Permits, Subdivisions,
Variances, Applications to the ADB land
use applications, or any other
development permit applications.
Note attachments:
Sincerely,
Diane M. Cunningham, Planning Secretary
* Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
OCT-530-97 THU 17:02
P. 02
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
250 SYN AVENUE NCM'rH ' rzo'MONDS. WA 9SC20 (-X& 771.0220 - FAX 12OC.) 77i-02,;j MAYOR
HEARING EXAMINER
CS t FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONSA'ND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAAMNER
'CI�I'y OF EDIMONDS
APPLICANT. Winston Whall.
CASE NO.: V 97-113
LOCATION- 19809 77'h Place wo-st
APPLICATION! A variance to iner ,LSe
le the maximum allowed height of an
accessOrY Structure (detached garage) of 15 feet ro 15,5 fec,
. and to
reduce the required west side setback from 7.5 Fcer to 5,5 feet to
correct an encroachment from a 1992 additioij (see Exhibit A,
Attachments 2 through 4),
REVrEW PRocESS..
Var,ance— Hearfrig Ex3miner conducts Pubhe hearing and rnaka5;
final clecision,
MAJOR ISSLTES:
a, Compliance with 'nmunity Developmerit. Code (ECL)C)
. EdmOnC13 C01
Section 16.20,030 (SLNrjLE-FANQ-Y RESIDENTIAL - Siie
De,velopment Standards).
b. Compliance with Edmonds COmmunitY DevelopmcnE Code (ECDC)
Chapter 20,85 (VARIANCES),
SUN MARY OF RECONLME
AND DECISION:
Staff Rccommcndation: Deny
Hearing Examiner Decision, Deny
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report: and
after visiting rhe site, the Hearing Exilminer
0 Conducted a Publi� hearinc, on (he app
hearing on the dpplic ' 43 iicat'ion- The
alion was 0 ened at 9:00 a.m., October 16, 1997, in the Plaza Room,
P
Edinonds Libiary, Ednionds, Washington, and closed at 9-20 a.m. participantt, a[ the public
hearing and the exhibirs offered and entered are listed in this report, Averbatini recordina of the
heatirig is available ill the Planning Division, b
Imorparated AtiStist 11, 189G
Sister Cities International —)qekinan, Japan
OCT-�30-97 THU 17:03
P. 03
Hearing Exalniner Decision
Case No. V 97-113
PaSc 2
HEARING COMMENTS:
The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing,
From the City;
Meg Gruwell, Project Planner, reviewed the staff advisory report (Exhibit A) and
recommended denial of the request for a variance. She notcd
* The house and garage are currently attached, but applicant will remove th
e breezeway.
0 The �ide property line on the West side of the property is approximately 5' 6" frorn the
housc,
0 The garage is 6" too tall and the need for a height Wlriaacc could have� been avoided if
the aPplicant had paid attention.
0 The variances do not appear to be (he Minimum variance lie(,essary.
From the Applicant:
W'nstorl Whall, applicant, said:
The two violations are correct and the conditions are not in compliance with the
code.
Regarding thehelgl�t variance:
91 The 15' 6" high garage will still be lower than the hOL15C,
0 NO views will be blocked by the additional 6" height.
6 The cOmPlaint which was fik�d was Only regarding the gamge being too
60se to the property line.
Regarding the 2' setback Yariance:
The errors were not intentiona's and were madc dwing construction.
The adjacent propel-ty owner has had no Impact to the use of his property.
The -re . are no windows or doors on that side of the neighbor� house.
Twelve feet exists between the two dwellings at this time,
The straight line distance between the nri-hbors ho use and th--� property
linn is 6' 6".
OCT�30-97 THU 17:03 P.04
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-113
Page 3
He will comply with the conditions recomniended by 6taff if (he viariances are
aPproved and he will gp and sin no more.
PrOM the community:
Peter Schuldt, neighbor, subniittcd 5everal pho'Lograpbs Of the subject property and of
neighboring propertics (Exhibit Q and a folder Of inforniation (Exhibi
included: it 8) which
A petition signed by 9 neighbors opposed to granting approval Of 'he requested
variances,
0 Background on the plat 2nd zoning in the area,
Private plat restrictions for Sandalwood 92,
Enlar,,,,,ed maps showing the locatior)g cf imProvements and additions which were
constructed by the aPplicant ovcr timc, (He alleged that MLIly of th
improvements or additions were done without pernlits e
and he alleged ffiat several
of the irn[PrOvementS Or additions are located within the rtquired setback W,ca,5),
Responses tO ihe Vaflance criteria and to the applicant's application inforrnation,
and
Site Plan for proposed addition of 984 square -feet which shows an 8 9 6" setback
instead of tho 51 6" setback which apparently exists.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLIJS10,NrS
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
1, Site Development And Zoning:
a. Facts:
Sizc: The subject property was created at 10,502 Square feet,.and after
an approved lot line a4justmelit is rec:orded, it will be 1(),739 squarc
feet. It is a wedge-shaped lot at the end of a cull-de,jac Exhibit A,
Attachmelit 4).
2) Land Use: The subject property i�
single-f,'Irnily residence, , currently developed with a detached
3) Zoning: The subject property is located in a single-family reside ti
zone and is zoned RS-8 (see Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
4) Terrain and Vcgctatiorl; The site is relatively level, with a slight grade
changre at the east and west property line. and is.land-,;caped with gruss,
shrubs and trees.
OCT-30-97 THU 17:04
P. 05
Hearing EXaminer Decision
Case No, V 97-113
Page 4
2, Neighborinz Development And Zoning,
a. Facts:
1) The properties to the 3outh, eaqt, and west are zoned Single-Farnil
5,S) and are developed with single-fiumily humcs (see
Residential (R, y
Exhibit A, Attachment 1).
2) The property to the north is zoned Multiple Residential (RM- 1,5) and
is developed with condominjiurm, and aPattinentg 1(see Exhibit A,
Attachment 1).
I
B. STATE ENVIRO.N,-NIENTAL POLICY ACT (,SEPA)
1. Fact: Variances granted band ort special circklinstances are cxcnipi from
SEPA review (WAc 197-11-800(6)(b) and ECDC 20.15,ik,080).
C. EDA/10NJ)S COMMUNIT Y DEVELOPMENT C0J)F- (ECDC) COMPLIANCr,,
1. Critical Areas Coirpliance
A. Fac-'3'
1) This proposal is subjcct to review U11der ECDC Chipter 20-15.13
(Critic&I Areas ordinance).
2) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist (CA,97-98) and
a waiver was granted to the critical areas study requirelijent.
b. Conclusion- The aPPlicant has ro-et the rcquirements of the Critical
Areas Ordinance.
2. COrnpliancc with RS-8 Zoning Standards
a. Facts-
1) The fundamental site development standards pert I a-ning to Residential
de�'eloPment'n tile RS-8 zone is sct forth in ChapreIr 16.20.030. These
include the f011owing for locating structujrs:
Street Setback: 25 feet
Rear Setback: 15 fect (5 feet for derached accessory
scruclUres cOvering Icss than 600 squal-e feet,
and less than 15 feet tal])
Side Setbacks., 7.5 feet
Maximum Height.- 25 feet
Lot Coverage: 35%
2) The applicant has upFljcd for and the city has approved a lot line
adjustinent (File LL-97-97) which will move the Property line.qo that a
7.5-foot �etback, will be maintained between tile east side of the housc
and the east sideproperty line, The deadline for q-)peals is occob r 9.
-e no appeal&, then tile ownel-5 can proceed to have the
1997. If there at e
lot line adjustment recordcd by the County Auditor so that it will take
OCT-30-97 THU 17:04 P.06
Hearing Examiner Decision
Ca.,ze No. V 97-113
page 5
effect. Without the lot line, 2djustyrient, the garage does not Maintain
the required east side setback.
3) The garage is also currently attached to the house with a breezeway.
Attached garages may be up to 25 feet tall, bur must Maintain a 15-foot
setback to the rear property line. The applicant is PTOPOsilig to remova
the bmmeway between the garage and t:he house in Order to have it
considered a detached accessory building. Detached accessory
buildillgS need only maintain a 5-foot rear setback, If they ate less than
6.00 square feet in area and less than 15 feet call.
b. Conclusion: If the lot line adjustment is recorded, and if the breezeway
is removed, then the proposal will comply with the requirements of tile
RS-8 zoning standardp, except for the height for the garage and West side
setback of the house. The variance would have to be approved for it to
meet tho-5c requirements,
3. Compliance with Requirements for a Variarc-e
2t. Facts: -
1) Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC set,5 forth the mechanism whereby a
Provision of the COdc may be Varied on a case -by -case. basis if die
application of the provision would result in an
unreasonable hardship. The criteria are as follows: Linusual and
(a) SP`cialCi=LImstanceS: That becauseof special circLimst.111ces
relating,"to tiie property such as size. shape, topography, loc' '
surroundings of the property, StriCtenfOrCenlent of tile 7 '40011Q1,
.01iing
ordinance would deprive the owner of use rights and privi lecyc's
permitted to other properties in the vicinity with the sarne zo"111110
Special circumstances should not be predicated upon any factor�"
personal to te Owner such as age or disability, extra expense
which may be necessary to comply with the zoning ordin-ancc, the
ability to secure a scenic view, the ability to make more profitable
use of the Pfopeity, nor any factor resulting frorn the action of tile
owner or any past owner of the same property.
(b) Special Privflege: That the approval of the variance wotild not be a
grant of special privilege to the.property in comp4rison *with the
limitations upon other properties in the vicinity with tile salile
zoning.
(c) Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance: That the approvill of
thr, variance will be c011sistent with the intent Of t1le comprehensive
plan, the zoning ordinance, and the zoning district ill which tile
property is located,
(d) Not Detrimental: That the vari.,tnce, as vproycd or conditionally
approved, will not besignifican0y detrimental to the public health,
Safety and welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in
the vicinity and the same zone,
OCT-30-97 THU 17:05 P.07
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97- 113
Page
(e) Minimum Variance, That the approved variance is the rninjmurn
necessary to allow the owner rights enjoyed by other Properties in
the vicinity with the -5arnc zoning.
2) The applicant h2s slubmitted derlaratl()ns with his submittal which
address the decisional criteria as f0llOWS (see Exhibit A. Attachnient
3):
(a) Regarding the wcst sidc setback, the applicant had plans aPproved
in 1993 for an addition. The dirt excavated for tho additioll was
piled on the west side Of the PrOPICAY. which obscured the exact
property line, A line of sight reading indicfacd that the Proposed
addition would be too close to the property line, so ajog in the
forms was made before the foundation was poured. After the
addition was constructed, it was deteniiined that the actuq] seEback
was only 5.25 to 6 feet frorn the property line. Regarding the
height of the garage. the garage was constnicted at 6 inuhes above
the allowed height and the height is comparable to the roofline on
the existhig faWy structlirc.
(b) The height of the garage would not be a special p)-ivilege. states the
applicant, as other properties in the area continue to have "Iccess to
similar structures, Regarding the sotback, it would not infringc
tipon the rights of the 4acent property ow the distance
between the two houses is 15 feet 4 inches ner' as
lawn and shrubs according to the applicant. and is op-�n space with
(0 The applicant feels that both variances will comply With the
Comprehensive Plan as the use of the aiea is residential, and diat iE
Complies With the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance,
(d) The applicant states that the variances will haVe no adverse affect
on the public health, safety and welfare of the Property or adjacent
dwellings in the vicinity.
(e) The side setback variance (1.5 to 2 feet) is necesaary to ptruift the
full udliZation of the property as allowed other properties in the
area, states the applicant. The garage height variance will allow
the owner to ut tilize the property in a manner compar -able to other
rcsidorits in the area,
3) The plun submitted for the 1993 addition, which was approved by the
Building Depucrnent, showed the new addition maintaining Lin 8.5 foot
-setback to the west side Property line.
OCT-*30-97 THU 17:06 P.08
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-113
Page 7
4) The garage was constructed without the necessary building perrnits,
The survey submitted shows th;It the garage as built only maintains a
five-foot setback to the rear property line. The garage currently has a
breezeway attaching it to the main house. In Ordcr to meet the required
rear setback, the applicant has proposed to take Off the breezeway,
since a detached StTUCtlire less than 600 square Let in size need only
maintain a five-foot setback, As a detached accussory building, it is
required to mftt tile 15-foot height limit,
5) The Planning Department re�ceived complaints about the setback o*F the
garage, which is being dealt with through a lot linc acijustment (file
LL-97-97), and a complaint abow the setback of the addition oil the
weRt side of the property. The complaints are in file ZE-97-6.
b. Conclusions:
1) The applicant and bis representative constructed both the addition and
the garage. With a better site plan or survey stakeS in the ground they
could have avoided the need for'a side yard setback varlance, With a
differont design, the garage could easily have been lade six ' lies
shorWr, It appears that the only reason for applyiIIg forIlthe v 'ne
ariances
that the past actions of die owner or his representativLt Ilave 110L �)cen
conformance with the adopted City regulations. Thc=fore, any.special
circumstance which exists was self civated and is not related to code
re4quirements as they relate to tile subject property. No special
eircumstartccs duc to tOP09rlplly, or size of shape of the lot havc been
prr-sented by the applicant as reasons why die variance should be
granted.
2) Other PTQPerrY Owners in the vicinity are required 10 meet setbacks and
height limits, Although MoSt of the houses in the neit")hborhood have
garages, these are usually either combined with the primary siructure
and maintain those regulations, or are; att-ached structures which appear
to meet regulaLions,
3) The proposed use is residential, which is' in conformance with the
comprehensive plan (see also Section IE below). Except for the
variance3 roque5ted, as proposed the appliciltion meets the intent of tile
zoning ordinance.
4) The proposed valianccs will not be significantly detrimental to the
public health, safety arid welfare or injurious to the property or
improvement in the vicinity. However. as the submittal of two
cOrnplaints deitionstrEltes. the improvement.9 made by tile applicant or
his TePreSentative have been found Objectionable by at least two
parties.
5) The Proposed variance is not the minimum necessury to allow tile
Owner rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity with tile Sallie
zoning. Rather, the proposeci. variances are the n1ininium variances
OCT.L30-97 THU 17:06 P.09
Hearing Examiner Deci.sion
Case No. V 97� 113
Page 8
needed to legalize existing additions which were built in contradiction
with adopted codes,
D. TFCHNICAL COMMITTiEE
Review by City Departments
Fact: The variance application has been reviewed and evaluated by the
Firc DePartment, Public Works Division. Engineering Divisioll, and the
Parks and Recre,-Ition Division. The only commenta received were from
the Engineering Division, who stated that the owner wouiri have to pave
their driveway in accordancc with the ECDC and comply with the tel-111s of
any future permits.
b. Conclusion: The applicant will need to comply with the terms of any
f11 t11110 perrrLitS, dS requi red bY [he Engiftering Divisio In.
JR- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (ECDC)
L Compreher)sive Plan Designation
a. Fact: The subject property appears to be dcsignated'a-S "Multi Family
I-figh , Density" residertial on the crjulpr�hellsive plan's bLibble diagrams.
b, Conclusion: The proposed development is not incons istent with the
existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use designatior) for, the site.
2. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies
a. Facts: The Comprehensive Plan, Residential E�Cycloprneat section,
identifies goals and policie3 which relate to "Residential Development" in
the City. SPecific goals and pollcies,,Ire discussed in detail below.
1) Section B states as a goal of the City that, "High quality residential
development which is appropriate to the diverse lifcstyle of Edmonds
residents should be maintained and prornoted....1,
2) Policy B.2 states "Procect neighborhoods from incompatible I additions
to existing buildings that do not harmonize with existing structilres in
the area-,,
b, Conclusion: The additions have harmonized with the architecture of the.
existing house and arent The jog which W,% created to Meet the perceived
setback was probably the Portion of the project least in keeping with the
design. The smaller setbacks. however, are not in keeping with the area,
In goneral, the Proposed variances are consistent with the above adopted
goals and policies of tl�,e City -
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusionS, t1l'
setback variance is denied. e request for a height variance and a
OCT,.30-97 THU 17:07
P. 10
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No- V 97-113
Nge 9
Entered this 30th day of October, 1997, pursuant to the authority Sr-dnted [he Hearings Exanliner
under Chapter 20, 100 Of the Community Development Code of the City of Edniondg,
Hearin Examiner
RECONSIDERATION'S AND APPEALS
and appeals
The following is a summary of the deadli=3 and procedures for Filing reconsider ion
- Any person wishing to file or respond to a recOmmendation or appeal
should conta�t the Plannfng Department for fuither procedural information,
REQUEST F'OR RECONSIDERATIOIq
Section 20,100,010.0 allows for the Hearing Exarfliner to reconsider his decision
or recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) Working days of the
date of the initial decision by any person who attends the public ftearing and signs
the attendance ragister and/or presents Jestimorly or by any person 'h'olding an
ownership interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or
rGeoilimendation, The reconsideration request Illust cite specific reference.,; to the
findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances governing die type of
application being reviewed.
"PrALS
Section 20,105,020-A & B describe how appeals of a Hming Examiner decision
or recommendation shall be Mide. The appeal shall be made ill writina, and shall
include the decision being appealed along with the name of the projecot applicant
and the date of the decision, the name and addresg of the individual or group
appealing the deciSion, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant
believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal n st be filed with the CornmuniLy
Development Directoir within fourteen (14) caleludar days after tile daLe of tile
dccisivn being appealed.
LAPSE OF AppROVAL
Section 20,85.020.0 staLes7he approved variance rnust be acted on by the owner within
orle year from the date of approval or the variance shall expire and be nail and void.
unless the owner files ar, application for an extension of tile time before the ex iration
and the city aPProvcs the applIcatiom- p
OCT-30-97 THU 17:07
P. I I
NOT108 To THE COUNTY ASSESSOR
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V 97-113
page 10
The Property owner may as a fOsult of the decisic)n rendered by the Hearing 2xaminer
request a change in thr, valuation of the property by the Snohomisli County Assessors
Office.
EXHIBITS:
The following exbibit were offered and entered into the record.
A. Planning Division Advisory Rp-port
B. Public Comments folder
C. Photos (3 envelopes)
PARTIES OF RECORD.
WiTISEOU G. Whall Edmonds Planning Division
18336 84" Place West Edmonds Enginccriflg Division
Edmcnds, WA 98026
Peter Schuldt
19812 77" Pi. W
Edmonds, WA 98026
wol
USE PERMIT
ZONE
CITY OF EDMONbs NUMBER
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT #
O�;E)NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS ADDRESS
cc a LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKI SUBDIVISION NO.' LID N
W WAILING ADDRESS
Z r
24
01: / PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved 0
CITY RW Permit Required 11
ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER/,. EXISTING REQUIRED DEDICATION — Street Use Permit Req'd 0
�IZS _7 7,
Inspection Required 13
NAME Sidewalk Required 0 a:
ETERSIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES W
M PRV REQUIRED
Ow ADDRESS YES 0 NOO
REMARKS Z
ZIP_7LEPHONE NUMBER
CITY
Z
NAME. A)d 7 A L) el
62
ADDRESS ENGINEERING M7MO DATED REVIEWED BY
0
0 -7
CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER
Z FIRE MEMO DATED REVIEWED BY W
0
0
STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE
VARIANCE OR CU ADB# SHORELINE #
Legal Description of Property - include all easements ......
SEPA REVIEW SIGN REA HEIGHT
Z COMPLETE I EXE T ALLOWED P 0SED ALLOWED IPROPOSED
0C
0
(n LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.)
W PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR
7b
_5 9Z
71 Z
_j Property 13 ' 1 5 1
Tax Account LOT AREA, PJANNING IEW BY DA
7E
f/
Parcel NO. lele- d dr - 0 /J M-50 ) tw,,-7., I
[VI RE14ARKS
NEW IM6_1 RESIDENTIAL PLUMBINGIMECH — 1 :7
COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR
ADDITION El CHANGE OF USE
0
MAL per( jc.-7nil Re — Prr(N63p 12(jo
RE40DEL APT. BLDG. SIGN I P
GRADING FENCE HECKED BY TYPE OF CQNSIRUCTION CODE OCCUPANT
FIREPAIR — CYOS. E] ( x —FT) —In— J_ 1 911 GRO P
DEMOLISH E] WOODIT11E SWIM POOL SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA
INSERT HOT TUB/SPA REQUIRED EIYES LOAD
GARAGE "E] RETAINING WALL/ I 4+tl)
141 GARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL REMARKS
0 (TYR FUSE,BUSI ESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108
_j
C FE 7, 1, /
IL 21 In I if 5
Di NUMkR_ NUMBER OF CRITICAL fu K,
W
0 OF DWELLING AREAS
I UNITS e INUMBER177—
co STORIES
RIBE W07K7T BE DONE (ATTACH PLOT PLAN)
(�A_ FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED
A A =A V PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION FEE
HEAT SOURCE: GLAZING BUILDING
PLUMBING
eck No. MECHANICAL
This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADING/FILL
Any Construction on the. public domain (curbs, sidewolks,
driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separate permission. STATE SURCHARGE
Permit Application: 180 Days
Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days STORM DRAINAGE FEE
. .1 1
"Applicant, on behalf of his or her si�ious'e�, heirs, assigns and ENG. INSPECTION FEE 30
A
w successors in interest, agrees to i ndem�#y, defend and hold
2 harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials
oe
2 employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages oi Z,
cr
< whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance
of this permit. issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT
ive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance
modify, wa
0 nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision." j- TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
I hereby ackiio(vi idge that I hava�rod'j4is application; that the
ATTENTION APPLICATION APPROVAL
information gfvWn i2dorrect; a at I *�the owner, or the duly
't of ihe owner. I agreeto comply with city and
authorized agen THIS PERMIT
state laws regulating construction; and in doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES T . his application is not a permit until
ed thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE signed by the Building Official or his/her
Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED Deputy: and fees are paid, and receipt is
tion Insuranca-eTTTRCW 18.27. INSPECTION acknowledged in space provided.
SIGN URE WNER OR AGENT) DATE SIGNED DEPARTMENT
CITY OF OFFICtS MATU DA E
/,,Af ac_ EDMONDS
CALL FOR RELEASED BY. DATE
ATTENTION INSPECTION'!
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE On OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN. MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771 r-0220 ORIGINAL — File YELLO� Inspecqtor
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC 10
SECTION 109 A),.- - PINK — Owner GOLD — Assessor
MICROFILM
N89'06'36"W
153.75'(OLD) EL. 100.11
154.81 '(NEW) -, �� I
EL. 99.80T--
ey, -
BREEZEWAY �0 \ Gpg.
-"'\ 01 EL. 100.36�1
12 (TO BE REMOVED) I ::�l
--A 9 -
EL. 9 9 3
<:
>0 - --:-
00. VAOUSE
OLD LOT LINE
(NO-21-24-E 99.53')
D=45*31'33" L=39.73'(OLD)
D=43'29'11" L=37.95'(NEW)
4v
49
BENCHMARK FOR —
HEIGHT CALC. -)
TOP DISK CONC.
MON. EL.=100.00
\(ASSUMED)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CALCULAMONS
LOT 12, SANDALWOOD NO. 2. AS PER PLAT
RECORED IN VOLUME 18 OF PLATS, PAGE
68, RECORDS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY.
WASHINGTON.
GARAGE COR. ELEV'S:
100.36
99.93
99.80
4-10n 11
/V
N13*16'37"W
27.05'
3:
Cu.,)
0 04
0
z
uj
r
=400.20/4=100.05 MEAN
+25'=125.05 MAX. ROOF PEAK
EXIST. ROOF PEAK IS 115.65
HEIGHT CALCULATION
FOR
I
IN I wmel a 1 111 Lei i I DO
N36W8Q2"E
LZIJ
Vn) 0
0 -1 -
n- <
o �:: -i
(rw I ,(^,r
a. z c=� A5?
66- -r"
147
SCALE :1'=30'
0. 15' 30'
LMRLovell— Sauerland & Associates, Ific.
Caen—/S—ejo-/Pl--/lkvWop--t ConmAt-ts
19W Md A"me T, Sdte 200, Lymvwd, VA. 00 (425p75-1591 Wrgm-?m
mlin Dm ?a WAM mx ft
N.R.W. J.T.T. 7-14-971 434 1"-5VI 97-3723
1 cmm I I
'I el-p —
(C4 T
City.'Of Ednionds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT e
Permit Numb' r:
EET FILE-, —1-1<1 C\ 1� &,.LoO %A 0 Issue Date: —Z
A..Addr�gs-or"Vici'nityofConstructio'n:- 1921.2, 19498,1P807 and 1-9811 77 Plitce
eft
B. Type of Work (be specific): Install 1 1/4" PE IP Main 1431 North cender ine
CY 9 0 199 St . reet Southwest to 29.8' North 6enterline 77 Place West.
Per Attached Drawi 9L 920-590"(111 6043-3.) (1)
C. Contractor:.- Washington. Vatural Gas eOmPaUY Contact: Frank Swa.u.
Mailing Address: 815 Mdrder Street, Phone:* 224-2278
State*License#: ' Seattle, WA 98111 Liability Insurance; Bond:$
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. Commercial Subdivision El City Project [�d. Utility (PUD, GTE,'W.NG"* CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family E] Single Family F] Other
INSPECT
INSPECTOR", OR: 1�w
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut 131 Yes ONo (4) G. Size of Cut: 2 x .4 H! Charge $
@ Drives
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY. Applicant.understands and by his signature to this application, agreesl ' tohold the City of Edmonds- harnilestftom injuries, damages, or
claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made agai�st the 66 of Edmonds, or any of its departments, or. employ-
ees, including or not limited to the de/ense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, and atto�heyfees by reason of granting!zQ, 6
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWNG THE FINAL INSPEC77ON
AAIDACCEPTANCEOF THE WORK ES77MA7FD RESTORA77ON FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY
C17Y FORCES, AT WHICIi 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOr1SSbN(7E TO THE APPLiCANT
Construction drawing of pro'lioseewor'li re'qu'ired'w'it�,�p'e�mit''a'p'pli�'cati'oii.
A 24. hour notice is required for inspection; Please call the Engineering Department- 771-3202.
Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration.is to. be in accordance With City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at All times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut ditches shall be' atched, with asphalt or City approved/ma't rial prior to the end, of the workin I g day;
p
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements* and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be available
on site at all timesfor inspection purposes.
Signature: Date: May 12.,- .199 2
(tvo�iractor.,or Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
............. --, ... ......... .......... . ............ .......
FOR CITY USE ONLY
............
... R.W
RIGHT.- OPWAYMEPOSIT:
............... ......... ....
... ........ .. . ........ ................ ....
A
.. 1 1. 1. .. . �. I I . I ................ ... .. .
........... s -5
DATE: ::�.. I.,... .", � � � SUED.:BY—.-,,64 �46
. .. . . . ... .. . ... .... ... .......... - ..... .
ISSUANCE
Engrg. Div. 1991
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund I I I - Route copy to Street Dept.)
Comments:
I Diagram:
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO
Partial Work Inspection by P. W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
Eng. uiv. im!
NoTat)
I - Fl LCCZT.E.. A UTI UTI E-cb
C,6,L-L- I -eX=-4P-4--5r=r=r=
48- 1,40U,R5 5eFC)RS- MIGSINC-x-
2. L&*Y DM7TSC-u WARNING WIRSQVER
,6.." FIE; DiREA=-, IBL.IR14A-. PIPP,
3. 1 t-4i5-rALL,- at-4 e pouN c) A-i�-400E. F='OF*,
EVeRY 1000- OF LOC.&-rIHC= \NIRU.
4. 5URVF-Y NOT RE-QUIRF-0
05. M&INM&tt-4 6, MINIMUM �r HCRIZOMTnd-
At4D 3' VSRTIC.6.L- CL.S&R-&.NCE�
F=RCM AU -CITY UTIL-[Tle-'E��
ORE-=1-4 CU-r5 ARF- e)HOWH
(2.')c 4-' -rYPICAl
1445� N' A-W
�7
SCALE 1"=10'
ol lo' 20'
23.4!
co
01)
=I a)
011
t
12 Im G
U.1
s
I HkET FILE
0A
IQ I
CA
yl J
W a-Vk-
Op0A /co
LEGEND
SET REE3AR/CAP L.S.A. NO. 22969-30585, OCT. 13, 1997
FOUND CONC, MON, IN CASE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 12. SANDALWOOD NO. 2. ACCORDINGTO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 18 OF PLATS, PAGE 68, RECORDS
OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY,, WASHINGTON.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS,
OF RECORD.
SET REBAR/CAP ON
PROPERTY LINE
FENCE 0.3' SWLY-
G)
APPROVED BY PLANNING
A,
-�Q A)
47
Li
FA
10
I
W n
z z
:3 D
m
0
z
Lj
Ld
U)
0(j)
CL :D
0
CL
Lu
0
0
X 10.
0.,
19.
SET REBAR/CAP ON
PROPERTY LINE
FENCE 0.3' SWLY.
SET REBAR/CAP L.S.A. NO. 22969-30585, OCT. 13, 1997
FOUND CONC. MON. IN CASE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 12, SANDALWOOD NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN VOLUME 18 OF PLATS, PAGE 68, RECORDS
OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASHINGTON.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS,
OF RECORD.
GIIX
llp 1/<
"'cl
14,
SET REBAR/CAP
AT COR. POSITION
FENCE 0.4' NELY.
a
00.
Ld
<
n
CONTROL MONUMENT
CENTERLINE
N 00*21'24' , E
'182.00'(P) 182.04'(M)