The URL can be used to link to this page

201 3RD AVE N.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII 4869 201 3RD AVE N + 4�1 A-3 IE 4-7.6 .1 act- J6b no. r.f. no. f.f. no. SHEET NO. OF Z SHTS-. wmmm�� i 4 -k �,F ED4f , '- A� I CITY OF EDMONDS SINGLE FAMILY ADDITION/REMODEL COVER SHEET Directions: Applicants are to complete the information in the WHITE BOXES ONLY (Shaded boxes are for City use only). This cover sheet must accompany each building permit application for a single-family residential addition/remodel project. PLAN CHECK # -J APPLICANT DATE RECEIVED PROJECT ADDRESS, PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL # �7 DESCRIPTION OF WORK 4RA) OWNER P H 0 N E CONTACT PERSON PHONE E-MAIL FAX MAILING ADDRESS En:)C-/-/F0 2 077e�'e0,619-r— ElFAX CORRECTIONS MAIL CORRECTIONS E-MAIL CORRECTIONS BY SIGNING THIS STATEMENT I UNDERSTAND THAT I AM THE CONTACT PERSON FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE ALL SUBMITTALS WITH THE CITY AND ONLY I CAN MAKE INQUIRIES ON THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION. I UNDERSTAND IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IN ADVANCE OF PERMIT SUBMITTAL ANY DISCRETIONARY PERMITS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT. I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY I HAVE SUBMITTED ALL NECESSARY . DOCUMENTATION IN ORDER! =TO� COMPLETE APPLICATION AND NO DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED. SIGNATURE DATE -00 INFORMATION ZONE LOT AREA. hOMBER"bF DWELLING UNITS� EXISTING D-EgOdSdED PROPOSED, "DISCRETIONARY 01PROVALS CA -- Determination SUBDIVISION CU VARIANCE SHORELINE SEPA Expires OTHER LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION EXISTING SF PROPOSED SF HEIGHT CALCULATION INFORMATION DATUM MAX SETBACK INFORMATION REQUIRED FRONT PROPOSED FRONT CNR. LOT YES [:] NO ADU,STATEMENT REQUIRED :;.STAFF�COMMENTS: SIDE SIDE TOTAL SF A B C D ACTUAL SIDE REAR SIDE REAR NO ST. DEDIC, []YES []NO FT. �RECORDING # L:\temp\building\forms\Add-rvw.vsd -- 7/00 ENGINEERING INFORMATION DRIVEWAY SLOPE % GRADING CYDS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 1977 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA INSTALLED 1977 OR LATER PROPOSED NEW NET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EASEMENTS Qn FT Qn FT SO.FT. (City Use OnI yl -'SIDEWALK,0EQ'D:.[]Y�tS[]N-O DRAINAGE PLAN REOID YES []NO LID# I ,i UNDER�G ROUND WIRING REQ-D [],YES NO STREET DEDICATION FT. 4STAFF4COMMENTS", �r M [OL0,L (Wjrq StAb'dTiON -INFORMATION N 1997 UBC, UMC, UPC, WSEC, VIAQ WITH AMENDMENTS 5-pitsi �� . i GNCRITERIA B I'll , 1_ . �1 WIND EXPOSURE WIND SPEED 80 MPH SEISMIC ZONE 3 Floor Live Load 40 Roof Snow/Live Load Floor Dead Load— 0 Roof Dead Load— /c, NUMBER OF STORIES BASEMENTS �/11' LOT SLOPE % ik[[A - SOILS REPORT PROVIDED f N//q-. :"F'L*oCih,.-'4'Ffii�.'i'Me'a*"�u-r'e'd'�to exi*e'Hor_waII) Existing Proposed Total Living Space Garage Carport Deck/Cov. Porch Other Balcony Live Load Balcony Dead Load FLOOD ZONE YES NO (City Use Ceiling Insulation On Window U-Value Wall Insulation Skylight U-Value ,Floor Insulation Glazing % Door U-Value' Slab Insulation' Energy: Prescriptive Target Systems,-. .Whole House Ventilation System Reg'.� Yes. PLNo.. �Any request for modification, variance or other administrative deviation (herinafter "variance") must be specifically called out and'identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with the city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city offical in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. 0 DATE,: MEMO TO: Building Division Community Development Department FROM: Engineering Department SUBJECT: 3 - . ' . I I; ...) I t After review of the subject Building Permit application, we have the following comments: 1. Connection to City water system required. 2. Connection to City sanitary sewer system required. 3. RiRht-of-wair Permit required -for any work on City property. 4. Driveway slope -not to exceed-14','.. 5. Backwater valve required if downstai.rs plumbing is below elevation of upstream manhole. 6. Water and sewer lines to be separated by 10 foot minimum. 7. Builder/owner responsible for containLna--A� off and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties i -n any way. Signature 0 a 13 a: w w z a z w x ui �:o ir w 3: w co co ir 0�co ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS P R 0 J E C T CITY OF EDMONDS CrvC CINTS - 10MONDS. wASmO41004 09M C H E C K SINGLE FA14ILY MULTIPLE COMMERCIAL R E V I E W L I S T PROJECT WE IA FA V Ic (:C*,kbb CONTACT NAIIE TELEPHONE NUMBER ADDRESS F Lt- -INITIAL DATE ACCESS SLOPE AND.VEHICLE ACCESS DRAINAGE PLAN STREET FILE LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFICATION \QUIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS EASEMENT - PUBLIC/PRIVATE CALCULATE SEWER CONNECTION IF NO LID i STREET PAVING REQUIRED :at K, AL&U rot-L" (c; wi CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED - &0-41-9 dt�L M &(Tv 5 SIDEWALK REQUIRED IL 4u, A& 961J 70 C, ]':u —<enr— CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY.REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED, V4�-S f BOND REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS STREET NAME SIGN REQUIRED OTHER SIGNING REQUIRED EXISTINC- WATER MAIN SIZE 0 " " c i / , WfiTER MAIN REQUIRrO SERVICE LINE REQUIRED HYDRANT SIZE EXISTING HYDRANT REWIRED PER FIRE COOE - (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK] SIZE CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION WATER flrTER CHARGE REWIRED-!�L�llr' REVIEW BY DATE (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACI SANITARY SEWER MING NUMBER FILE WiBER SIDE SEWER.AVAILABILITY SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION FEE REQUIRED OPEN DITCH EXISTIllri REQUIRED 1 4-)-- ;J CULVERT REQUIRED110- OPP PMAL 1) 0, SIZE CATCH BASIN REQUIRED INDICATED ON SITE PLAN SHOULDER D.RAIKAGE MAINTAIN COLLECTI011 ON SWALE OPEN RUtIOFF MANHOLE REQUIRE INDICATED ON SITE PLAN SOIL CONDITI WA FIELD CHECKED L PEVIEW BY CATE (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK, j rNrrE ''I CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY FJ � F1 206-575-0090, 800-562-4867 n . �;. El El El & 460 El El 9 RE - PERMIT# PROJECT: LaFave Condominiums CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL IIEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT WE PC&D. INC. as Principal, and ift=nl (Contractor) UNITED—P 1CF ClUr—INSUM _�tTAKL_, a corporation organized anl Bonding Company) -existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Waghington are held and firmly bound unto the City of Edmonds. Washington, in the sum of THIRTY- NINE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDREDdollars, the payment of which we firmly bind ourselves, our heirs. executors, administrators. assigns and successors in interest jointly and severally. THE CONDITIONS OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the amount of the bond set forth hereinabove' has been determined by submission by, the developer or owner of the property affected to the Building Department a cost estimate of the improvements based on the approved.development plan. That such estimate has been reviewed by the Building Official who has set the amount of the performance bond; 2. Upon the satisfactory Installation and completion of the required site improvements, as evidenced by the written approval of the Building Department, the developer or owner shall maintain a Performance Bond or similar security to guarantee the maintenance of the required site improvements for a period of two (2) years from the date of said approval. which bond or similar security shall be fifteen per cent (15%) of the principal amount set forth of the face of this bond; 3. Both principal and bonding company hereby agree that in the event the owner or developer falls to complete the indicated improvements within 24 months, that the City of Edmonds may demand that the improvements be installed or compfeted immediately to City standards. Upon the failure of the oviner or developer to complete said improvements within the time period set forth, and after demand from the City of Edmonds, the City may proceed to have said improvements installed and/or completed and the principal and bonding company agree that the funds for payment to the limiti of this bond shall be delivered within ten (10) days of receipt of demand for payment thereof and the City may proceed directly against this bond for payment without first compelling payment by the owner or developer. The term of this bond shall be from June 7 , 1984 , to June 7 , 19 8� PC&D, INC. BYL-/ Counter --LEY,ATKIN & STEWART,INC. Contr ctor UNITED PACIFIC I S ANY (bonding com6any NXWy45&4 4 'JSte"rZ� By :�_ - - (Agent) a M. McCoy, At4krney-fn-F t Accepted: City of Edmonds 9 grid /V CITY OF EDMONDS, PLANNING DEPARTIENT 505 BELL STPEET EDMONDS, WA -98020. 717 / - 3 2-0,21, APPLICATION FOR STREET USE PERMIT Name of Applicant: �zw. C'. 6 C-0 . Mailing Address: 7— V - - - _A3 10A 1z 15 9 Telephone Number: J��J-JW'/V> Date: __ MAY 11984 OCR." F/ I a- " Descriptio f Public Place or Portion the,,e&,,� red t be used: (exhibit may be attached) VWim waftwe_ AL&461 VPWij. 014104 g;pr- 00U., ADVAet!*4-r-ro Type of Use desired to be made of Public 1P'lac if applicable, attach plans and specifications for any utility or structure to be erected and/or maint'ained on the Public Place: Am�ellrrcy TEMPORARY PERMIT: Unless otherwise designated herein, this permit is understood by applicant to be wholly b�f atemp'orary nature, -that it vests no permanent right whatsoever. If the permitted use becomes dangerous or such structure shall become insecure or unsafe, or shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this title, the same may be revoked and the s�tructu"re and obstructions ordered removed by order' of the City Engineer. If this application is for a specified period of time, the terms of said application is:_01K&"-n1s INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages or claims of any kind or descrip- tion whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. In addition, applicant understands that the City shall be provided a certificate of insurance to indemnify and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from all claims.and/or property damage, naming the City of Edmonds as an also insured. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 6.40-OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE: Applicant warrants that he has read, or had the opportunity to read, Chapter 6.40 of tK—e dmonds City Code, attached herewith, and understands that all terms of.that Ordinance are incorporated herein.As if set forth in full and this application and permit therefore are subject to the term's of that Chapter. of the Edmonds City Code. ��p cant �sSiq . �natur�e Da te 11/7/74 rev. C.i.ty of Edmonds Planning Department -`A:PPLICATjON"F0R 'STREET USE -PERMIT -- Pa2e 2 Approval (and Agreement, if applicable) of Abutting Property Owners: Sionature Printed Name Address Date DO NOT WR . I-TELBELOW 'TH19112NE" (Tb-) Se-,�,-tdmpl'ete'd --6� -Is1-uiWq'-A' gency) Ci ty Couhcfl'Appr6val'(Att , ach Minute' Entry): 00 Permit Fee: Annual Fee: Alp, _ due January 1, 19 Amenities Design Board Approval (tf apolie�61e) Attach Minute Entry: Ar%,m op Building Official Approval (if applicable): Pa. We Signature Date Provision for Indemnity: Terms and Provision of Performance Bond, if applicable: (Reference 6.40.050 of applicable Ordinance) PER.N',IT AUTHORIZATION BY gnature, PERMIT NO. Remarks: �11/7/74 rev. m!�n Da te DATE 0 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE in effect on date of this certificate arranged by HuftVq Mhoono & ftwu% hc. AGC Building/1 200 Westlake Ave. N., Suite 603/Seattle, WA 98109/ (206) 284-7272 This is to.certify that the insurance described below has been arranged for the I nsu red. designated in this certificate. Any requirements or provisions in any contract or agreement between the Insured and any other person, firm or corporation will not be construed as enlarging, altering or amending the definition of insured or any other terms or conditions of this certificate or the insurance designated. Such insurance, subject to the limits of liability, coverages, hazards, exclusions, provisions, conditions and other terms thereof, is in full force and effect as of the date this certificate was issued. Insured: P C & D, INC. 5240 Shoremeadows Road Address: Freeland, Washington .98249 Bodily Injury Liability Insurance —Other Than Automobile Consolidated American Insurance Co. 04-18-85 CAT 184689 Primary Insurer Expires — Pol. No. Limits $ Incl. Each Person $ 500,000 _ Each Occurrence $ 500,000 —Aggregate Bodily Injury Liability Insuran8 a AutorJ9 le P�ipary Insurer c�n S Pated American Insurance -Co. Expires 04-18-85 CAP 184689 p Xcombined single 11mit of 11abT-LITy in—c-lua-d-Ini—g roperty damage 11a. I ity. Limits $ 500,000*_ Each person $ 500,dbO* Each Occurrence Property Damage Liability Insurance —Other Than Automobile Primary Insurer Lloyds of London Expire P4-48-85 Pol. No. 30244 Limits $ 100,000 Each Occurrence 100,000 Aggregate Property Damage Liability Insuranc Primary Insurer C 1 aulotm'dolileAmerican Insurance Co. Expires 04-18-85 Pol. No. CAP 184689 Limits $ *See above Each Occurrence Workmens Compensation Insurer See Washington State Industrial Expires Pol. No Emp. Liability Limit Each Accident Excess Liability Insurance Insurer Limit (A) $ Expires combined single limit in excess of above described underlying limits. (B) Up to $ combined single limit in excess of above described underlying limits. In accordance with the above, the insurance covers the operations and locations described as follows: Street Use Permit Pol. No. The City of Edmonds is added as an additional insured, but only as respects their interestin operations pefformed by P C & D, Inc. as --..respects the above street use permit. Blanket Contractual is.included in the above captioned general liability policies (4s respects standard hold harmless agreement). 'Yd' hy In the event of cancellation of said Policies. days notice of such cancellation will be given the party named below at tneaRaress shown herein. The policy provides, under the Insuring Agreements, contractual liability coverage with respect to any contract or agreement wholly in writing. subject to.all the ex- clusions, conditions and other provisions of the policy. This certificate is not a policy and does not afford any insurance coverage. Nothing contained in this certificate shall be construed as extending coverage not af- forded by the designated insurances or by endorsement thereto. Except as specifically provided for in this certificate, the Insurers shall have nodutyto notify the party to whom this certificate is addressed as to any change in, or cancellation of, the insurances and shall not be responsible for any failure to do so. .April 27, 1984 DaleCity of Edmonds To Civic Center 505 Bell Street AddngaM BY onds, Washington 98020 t RoAaM.-R�i,,Har,tz CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 0 in effect on date of this certificate arranged by AGC Building/1 200 Westlake Ave. N., Suite 603/Seattle, WA 98109/ (206) 284-7272 REVISED CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the insurance described below has been arranged for the Insured designated in this certificate. Any requirements or provisions in any contract or agreement between the insured and any other person, fi rm or corporation will not be construed as enlarging. altering or amending the definition of insured or any other terms or conditions of this certificate or the insurance designated. Such insurance, subject to the limits of liability, coverages, hazards, exclusions, provisions. conditions and other terms thereof, is in full force and effect as of the date this certificate was issued. Insured: P C & D, INC. Address: 5240 Shor*emeadows Road Freedland, Washington 98249 Bodily Injury Liability Insurance —Other Than Automobile Primaryinsurer Consolidated American. Insurance Co.. Expires 04-18-85 Pol.No.CAP184689 Limits $ Incl ._ Each Person S 500,000 Each Occurrence $ 500.000 Aggregate Bodily Injury Liability Insurance —Automobile Primaryinsurer Consolidated American Insurance Co. Expires 04-18-85 Pol. No. CAP184689. *Combined Single Limit of Liability Including Property Damage Liability. Limits s- 500,000* Each person $ - 5 00 , 000* Each Occurrence Property Damage Liability Insurance —Other Than Automobile Primaryinsurer Mayris, of T.ondon Expires 04-19-95 Pol. No. '40244 Limits $ 100,000 EachO.ccurrence 100,000 Aggre I gate Property Damage Liability Insurance —Automobile . Primaryinsurer Consolidated American Insurance Co. Expires 04-18-85 ' Pol. No. CAP184689 . See above* Limits Each Occurrence Workmans Compensation Insurer See Washington State Industrial Expires Pol. No. Err.p. Liability Limit Each Accident Excess Liability Insurance Insurer Limit W $ Expires combined single limit in excess of above describea underlying limits. (P) Up to S combined single limit in excess of above described underlying limits. In accordance with the above. the insurance covers the operations and locations described as follows: Street Use Permit. Pol. No. The-C . ity of Edmonds is added as an additional insured, but only as respects their interest in operations.performed by P C & D, Inc, as respects the above street use permit. Blanket -Contractual is included in the above captioned general liability policies (as respects s . tandard hold.harmless agreement). A 30 day notice (Vid certified mail) will b . e given to the certificate holder in the event of cancellation of any of the above polities. In the event of cancellation of said Policies, days notice of such cancellation will be given the party named below at the address shown herein. The Policy provides, under the Insuring Agreements. contractua I liability coverage with respect to any contract or agreement wholly in writing, subject to all the ex- clusions, conditions and other provisions of the policy. This certificate is not a policy and does not afford any insurance coverage. Nothing containea in this certificate shall be construed as extending coverage not af- forded by, the designated insurances br by endorsement thereto. Except as specifically provided for in this certificate, the Insurers shall have noduty to notifythe party to whom this certificate is addressed as to any change in, or cancellation of. the insurances and shall not be responsible for any failure to do so. Date May 1, 1984 City of Edmonds K@ Z.Mwmn�"Gnc. To Civic Center Add ress 5*05 Bell Stre I et -BY_ Edmonds, Washington. 98020 Ronald R. Hartz WIGHT & HARDT, INC. 617 Medical -Dental Building EVERETT WA 98201 [LIEVVIER VR�KZM0UYZL MAY 111984 (206) 259-2118 TO C'16z /1/c af-Az GENTLEMEN: DATE 1 JOB NO. ATTENTION in RE: L e pyi, n WE ARE SENDING YOU� Erlttached 0 Under separate cover via -the following' items: • Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specificatio ns • Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 C IES OP.] DATE NO. DESCRIPTION <:?a .4 go.5' `4017 47 —7;7 , 1�� 2 S THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: P_V10*r` approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 For your use, 0 Approved as noted MA9--r"equested 0 Returned for corrections 0 For review and comment 0 0 FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS— 00,11-j-ele-1 Cot- I�F�lce • Resubmit copies for approval • Submit —copies for distribution • Return -corrected prints El PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO &,)62rrPe7 SIGNED: FORM240-3 Anflabistrorn��OrGrotorMus.01450 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF EDMONDS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (206) 771-3202 Edmonds, Washington 98020 LARRY S. NAUGHTEN MAYOR Administration — 250 - 5th Avenue North Maintenance & Operations — 200 Dayton Street May 8, 1984 Ms. Cathy Rickie 215-3rd Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Cathy: SUBJECT: CHARGES FOR METER TURN OFF This is to inform you the $20.00 charge is for the billing period of December and January, 1984. Notice was sent notifying you of your past due bill. Also, you made arrangements to pay the bill on March 7. We had no way of knowing when Prime Construction would close the account, therefore, we continued to bill on the regular billing schedule. The $20.00 charge cannot be reduced. Arrangements can be made with our billing office by calling 771-3051. BRM/ml cc: Utility Billing 4 MARCH � 1 Sincerely, BOBBY R. MILLS Acting Supt. of Public Works N o7 3 ePq dc),ez-l' C41-4<�o 3- . /0 0 MEMO TO: FROM: June 19, 1984 Larry S. Naughten Mayor Bobby R. Mills Acting Supt. of Public Works SUBJECT: CATHY RICKIE -,215-3RD AVE. N. IS% Cathy Rickie called me on approximately May 1 regarding payment of the $20.00,turn off/on notice she had received.* (When a water bill becomes delinquent, this fee is standard procedure as Jeff indicated per the City Code.) Cathy was going to move within a short time because a contractor was to start construction soon, but made no arrangements to extend the payment period until she moved. A delinquent notice wa's sent out and a promise was made by telephone that she would pay her past due account'by March 21, 1984. (Due date on delinquent notice was March 19, 1984.) Payment was not made and.another letter was mailed to her with no response. Due to this, her water was shut off on April 2, 1984, as we feel she had ample opportunity to pay her account and avoid turn off/on fees. We did not know that notice had been given her to move; we were only handling the account as delinquent and following the necessary steps. I under- stand her concern,.but feel Jeff did follow the necessary steps to clear the account. We always try to work with all customers when possible and will continue to do so. If you have any questions, please call. BRM/ml HILL/ 6T 0 June 19, 1984 MEMO'TO: Larry S. Naughten Mayor VIA: Arthur J. Housler Finance Director FROM: Jeffrey Ristau Accounting Supervisor SUBJECT: TURN ONIOFF CHARGED TO MS. CATHY RICKIE 215-3RD AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 i According to our records, Ms. Rickie is the renter of a house located at 215-3rd Avenue North. Several notices were sent to the service address in an effort to collect for water and sewer services provided during the period of December 1, 1983 to February 1, 1984. Notice 9 Original billing Delinquent notice Delinquent letter Date Mailed Due Date 2/9/84 3/7/84 3/22/84 3/5/64 3/19/84 3/28/84 Ms. Rickie contacted utility billing by phone and promised to pay by March 21. On April 2, after receiving no payment and in accordance with City Code, Section 7.10.020, the City turned off water service and left a door hanger notifying tenant of action. Ms. Rickie presented payment of her water and sewer bill amounting to $36.26 on April 3. She refused to pay the $10.00 turn-off and $10.00 turn -on charges which are assessed to delinquent accounts acording to Section 7.10.070 of the City Code. After explaining to Ms. Rickie that she had been properly assessed and.is responsible for the turn on/off fees, Ms. Rickie refused to pay the fee. I explained that if she wished to protest the fee, she could present her case to Bobby Mills, Acting Public Works Director. In order to. provide her the time to present her case, I instructed Ilene to: e, 1 � . Turn On/Off Charged to Ms. Cathy Rickie June 19, 1984 Page 2. JR/ml -- Charge her account the $20.00 fee, pending final disposition of Ms. Rickie's case by Bobby. -- Turn on the services at 215-3rd Avenue North. t:� I - k. I CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 775-2525 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR June 21, 1984 Ms. Cathy Rickie 215 - 3rd Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020 Dear Cathy: LARRY S. NALIGHTEN MAYOR RECEIVED JUN 2 P, 7984 PUBLIC WORKS 0% P14 I have reviewed the situation you came to see me about. While the City did follow all its procedures of no�tification, I do believe there were some unusual circumstances that were not entirely your fault. I have decided to split the $20 bill with you as we discussed. Sincerely, CITY OF EDMONDS Larry S. Naughten Mayor LSN: drrw cc: Bobby Mills, Acting Superintendent of Public Works Jeff Ristau, Accounting Supervisor _R ECEIVED �JUC 12 7984 STREE-T FILE PUBLIC WORKS L, 61 C ANDERSON - MAGRUDER COMPANY, INC. MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS P.O. Box 30759 Seattle, Washington 98103 (206) 784-4600 '014193341993 July 10, 1984 V86t 8 1 inri City of Edmonds (13AI3038 Building Department 250 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Wa. 98020 Attention: Mr. Bill Stroud Reference: La Fave Condominiums 201 - 3rd Avenue North Roadwork and Excavation for New Water Service Anderson -Magruder Job #84-050-S Gentlemen: Please find attached an area map detailing the proposed traffice revisions necessary to install new fire and domestic water service lines to the above referenced building. Please review and contact me at our office at 784-4600. Sincerely, ANDERSON-MAGRUDER COMPANY, INC. Lonn L. Bear Project Manager cc: David L. Magruder Larry F. Meyers file #84-050-S LLB/pb Contractor license # 223-02 An-De-Rm-2930H If b - WM. T-4 ;:7 C�k ji z JA 17� A *r "m 4 ........... t.7 7 , A IV 1 �5w. -F, T-4- — -71 ILL- -T it 41 T_ T '77 17 AV E TJ U-4, -7- f7-7 '"IT rT I" CITY OF EDMONDS Permit No., q PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Issue Date 0 AV RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SEP 0 1984 A. *Address or vicinity of Construction 9 Permit Issued To: H i -<&-R U I C Lx- O�vner: 4A FN u Type of Work to be Done: _S792'arr Name -To -�a e2L I I Q 07 (_ 5 7 \,19 Work in Connection With: Mailing Address El Sub or Plat El Single Family mrm�aCbs WW'45� �P'66pao 0 Comml. / Ind. pt. Condo. City; S ta te, Zip Code 0 Pavement Cut: LV es El No Contractor:, S&W4-11_i TIMAIJ/d,6 0" L-- Name -//,//? /"070fl P Mailing Address 4,,,;u Z' .< I -J City, 'State, Zip Code 5'eT&)el (5%7-0 / a State License Number Telephone Number NO WORK TO BEGIN. PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to'this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless �w from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that rhay be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. U Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year "i ca following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. 0 Z 0 U C4 0 Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. T,faffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 7t7hd.5AXTX1rXP4RR ANN 771-3202, ext.. 25� I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: Date gent THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK //� x . C. Issued By: 49 Time Authorized: Vold after \3 Q —days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: 430,0() Security Deposit: 1"�'/ Receipt No.: Fund I I I Fee: Street Cut D;i*mensions OC) NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route cor),v to Street Dept. Comments: Diagram: i Contractor called for inspection Yes ,Ajork Disar)proved By- Date: Work Approved By: Date: Inspector: No Bv: Date: Ena. Div. December 1978 PUBLIC WORKS DEPAWEMI.N"r, LNGINL.ERING DIVISION APPLICATION FOR R1GI1T-OI:-WAY CONSTRUCTION PE'RMIT A TIHS m.mi.1'r mus'r BE AVAILAULF, AT THE JOB FOR INSPECTION PURI1OSES1JCC,,-' Svrr Applicant: to Complete Parts A and B 1AUTJ 5-1981 A. Permit to be issued to: P.U'.D. No. I of Snohomish County For Work at: (address or vicinity) -�01-3rd.Avenue North WNWING Type of h'ork to be done: install and maintain that portion of the underground power system to serve Chazeau ta F ve-CUILUU5.- Lattach drawing when applicable) W.O. 36, DrawinjZ No. 48660 Time Required - Start: Sentember 1 0, 1984 -Finish: 3 days Oi,ner: Chateau La Fave Condos Naille W.O. # 36/48660 Address Li tY Contractor: PUD No. I Nam.e -PO Box 1107 Address State Zip Everett, WA 98206 City State Zip Telephone No. State License No. Telephone No. 347-4356 Eagineer Bill Neubauer B... INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold tile City of Ed;,-,onds har;-aless from any injuries, damages, or claims of anv kind or dcscript4 on whatsoever, foreseen or unforscen,, that may be made. against,the applicant or the City -of Edlionds, or any of its departments or einployees, including. �or not liiliited. to the d.,3fense of any legal 'proceedings includin.9 dcfensc costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractoi is.responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of cne ycar fol llowing the final inspection and acceptance of tile restoration by the En,-incerina Division. .Funds hold from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fe e) will be held until the filial street P-Itch is completedi at which ti, be processed. I for issuance to tile appli . cant. me a debit or credit will Work is subject to inspection and restoration in accordance with City Code. A 24-hour notice is required for inspection by E i Call 775-2525, ext. 220. I undOrsUild that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection Purposes at all tillics. Si,gn.lture:- DATE: 8/10/84 Owl�ir 3 Ad ing'hd 'h�tat/Administrator C. TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING AGENCY: 1),Itd X') A�!,e rill i t Fee: Security iloild: od: - (Fzgc SmEET- Me; P1111111110\11*4 I"N-. (4, /fat At�ap TO . At 13 SUBJECT: INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICATIONS DATP 19 FROM eoftAAF, ,iCITY OF EDMONDS NU PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTION CALL Permit 7-7-5-25-2�5- Ext. -2-21, Issue Da SIDE SEWER PERMIT '77/ -SXo7- . Ize A tRE, A PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE SEP -L 0 1984 1WAWA=,ANF3wdW,3W3W30V-dW3W AWAW 1. Address of Construction 5�,O/,7 r, D um ic WORKS— P 2. Prop erty Legal Description (include all, easements),47,,, 3. Single Fa ily Residence A, r-FamJ711y No. of L m in Ell Commercial rl 4. Owner and/or BuilderjEj- A6 -4f D 5. Contractor & License No., <-V t 5,7 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way No Yes (If Yes Right"of- way Construction Permit Required Call Dial Dig ( 3,42ca,51-3,405,1�,df ore excavation) . 1-800-454-9555 E-4 7. Cross other private property: Yes No V Easement required - attach legal description and county easement number. READ THE FOLLOWTNG AND SIGN: 04 a. Property owners must obtain apermit to install side sewers on �H their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to construct side sewers in the public' right-of-way. b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsibility for,each E-4 installation for one year. �4 C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum of a six inch (6") a4 z side sewer line. 0 d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30") to any structure. 0 e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade of 2% (1.15 0 and maximum grade of 100% (450). 0 EH f. No turn in side s8wer greater than 4-5 (1/8!bend) is 0 allowed between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8 bend) and wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along 'sewer 'line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k.- Side sewer must'be left uncovered,until inspected and approved by the City. 1,. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice required. 'x/ DATE: -941 / I,certify that I have read and shall comply with the above —PERMIT FEE: 4',.-;30, g--9 DISAPPROVED BY: Date: 1 , ' . B Date: CONNECTION FEE: 04 APPROVED By Date: ly-10-194� 0 'A, - 07dm* 44 PEP.MIT MUST BE POSTED I JOB SITE AV The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO - ------------------------- - ----------------- - 4 W #I NEW CONSTRUCTION C& REPAIRS LID NO . .................. ASMT. NO... � ---- ---------- OWNER :RC-.!M ---- uw:;� .......... LAYAR-4 F-- -C-ol-,.4- 0-0- A .... CONTRACTOR --- TREt4CtVAAt*G .... SMV:i .. PERMIT NO. .65 --- ( -9 JOB ADDRESS 20-1 .......... 3-RD ----- -------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT ............. BLOCK NO. --a ----------------------------- DF AL LEY 10 (T) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- NAME OF ADDITION -------------- Ei>m-at�Aatz .......... .. iR EDMONDS EATMENt--PLAW %Rt) 5 OP 106 . 8"r-Lo"'I mxlm — 147 201 vawlft Co. 5' ce. is,, semi> 39 'ro SURF^" 3 RD t,40. Approved: DATE *ALL ... Ao�-* .. � BY 1 Z,,g A)Z)10* -7�O NE FoRTY-FiFrH S4iET' SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98105 (206) 54540DO FIMIDENnALIFFAILMMESERVICM. July 30, 1984 RECEIVED JUL SO-1984 Mr. Thomas J. Weindl AMC WORKS Mrs. Marion E.- Weindl P.O. Box 247. Eastsound, WA' 98245 Re: 'Broken si'dewalk on 200th Block Bell Street Dear Mr. &.Mrs. Weindl.: Please recall our phone conversation shortly after you,.and your contractor moved the home you.purchased at 215 - 3rd Avenue'North-, Edmonds. The subject at -the time -was the visable broken sidewalk concrete, made by the house mo ' ving.dolli-es.as the.home Was pulled over this sidewalk and onto Bell Street. The city-requested..and.now.demands.that.some.120 feet of sidewalk be replaced. They have .'.barricaded:. -,.the..* si d6Wal k., closing it until repairs. are-� made. Our contractor has.agreed to replace this sidewalk only when�.and after payment of $750.00 had been received. You.or your house movers are directly responsible for this sum.- Please make arrangements to send $750.00 to either Mr. John McGraw @-210 - 3rd Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020,-or. to.myself, made.out.to.PC & D Inc.. Clearly mark the -amount for sidewalk repair. My address is 700 N.E. 45th, Seattle, WA 98105. We do not -care for this type of,demand however you folks have appeared to be responsibl e. � Please respond by August 20th, 1984 or -I -must -take, fur--.;... ther legal atti . on through the filing of liens and small claims court action in your county..* Sincerely yours A Warren G. tteson Agent for the Owners -of LaFane Condominiums 201 - 3rd Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Enclosures cc: Mr. John McGraw PC & D, Inc. City of Edmonds CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Uj 0 LU SUSPENSE DATE: SUPERINTENDENT 711C, Investigate and Report Take Appropriate Action Prepare letter/memo or;ny ignature Vr Information Previously Ref'd Status of Action? Return to: OFFICE ADMINISTRATOR BUILDINGS & GROUNDS DIV. SUPERVISOR EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIV. SLIPERVISOR STREET DIVISION SUPERVISOR WATER/SEWER DIVISION SUPERVISOR TREATMENT PLANT DIV. SUPERVISOR SECRETARY WORK ORDER COORDINATOR COMMENTS: FROM: DATEs land use consultants I DRAINAGE STUDY LA FAVE CONDOMINIUM SUBMITTAL DATE: February 21, 1984 FIL D WA 0. p el /ONAL Rr. cF i\j ED MAR 2 11984 ENGINEERING 617 medic al-dr?ntnI hlri(,l everett, wa Q8201 206/259-2118 DRAINAGE STUDY FOR LA FAVE CONDOMINIUM February 21, 1.984 I. PEAK RUNOFF RATE FOR 10-YEAR STORM RATIONAL METHOD: Q = CIA WHERE: EXISTING CONDITIONS C = Runoff Coefficient I = Rainfall Intensity A = Acres, Area T = Time of Concentration c A = 0.66 C = 0,54(0.20) Landscaped Area + 0.12(0.90)'Impervious Area = 0.33 0 . 61� T 10 + 270 10 + 5 = 15 (Slope 1 .5%', Ground Cover Lawn) c �60)(O.8-�) (Exhibit A) 1 10 = 1.50 (From Exhibit B) Q 10 = (0.33)(1.50)(0.66) = 0.33 II. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT AVERAGE C Dev 0.26(0.20) + 0.40(0.90) = 0.62 0.66 III. MAXIMUM OUTFLOW PER ACRE IMPERVIOUSNESS (CFS/AC Q Allowable Outflow 0 Acreag x Runoff Coefficient (C D) Q 0.33 0 (0.66)(U—.67) Q 0 0.806 IV. STORAGE TIM The Instant Stora�e Begins until the Peak Storage is Attained (Min. T -25 +V=2251—. Q Q 0 T -25 + -V�2255 �.80 .806 6 T = -25 + 53 T 28 min. V. VOLUME OF WATER FLOWIN INTO THE RETENTTON BASTN- PER ACRE IMPERVIOUSNESS (FT3/AC).. V s 3607T - 40-Q T T + 25 V s 3607(28) - 40(0.806)(28) 28 25 V 1906 903 S V s 1003 FT'/AC VI. M.UIMUM VOLUME OF'WATER STORED IN RETENTION BASIN (FT3) V T V x Area x C D V T = 1003 x 0.66 �.O.62 V T = 410 FT' VII. STORAGE PROVIDED IN ON -SITE RETENTION SYSTEM. 721 of 3011 CMP @ 4.91 cu. ft./ft.. 353 cu. ft.' .51 of 48" Manhole C.B.' @ 12.6 cu. ft./ft. 63 cu. ft. TOTAL VOLUME 416 cu. ft. VIII. ORIFICE DESIGN: Q Ca V2-g—h Where Q Discharge, cfs C Co efficient of Discharge 0.62 a Area of Orifice, Square Feet 2 g Acceleration of Gravity, Ft. per Sec. 32.2 For Q 0.33 h 2..96 a Q 0.33 C -V-2 Fgh (0.62) -V(2)(32..2)(2.96) a 0.0385 Sq. Ft. a 5.55 Sq. In. KA 2/21/84 Since a ffR 2 Radius,= R a 1.33 inches 7T ..�F I/ of D 2.66-inches 3a IX. BASEMENT SUMP PUMP DESIGN: Area draini'ng to pump: 401 x 1301 (Ramp Area) = 59200 Sq. Ft. Assume Runoff Coefficient = 0.90 A 50-year design storm that prod.Oces 1.6 inches of rainfall in 6 hours. Total Runoff Volume = Area x, Runoff Coefficient x Rainfall 59200 FT2(0.90)(1.6 in.) I Ft..= 624 FT 3 12 in. Sump pump pumping rate = 50 gpm 0.11 cf's (See Exhibit C) Total volume pumped in 6 hours = (0.11)(6)(60) 2,376 cu. f't. X. DETERMINE MAXIMUM STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED AT A CONSTANT FLOW ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE USING THE Y + W METHOD FOR A 25-YEAR STORM. 0 Allowable Outflow 0.11 1.02 Acreage x Runoff Coefficient (0.1275-7957 - T -25 + 1804 -25 + 1804 17 Vj_ 104 go _VL 1.0 2 V 43291 - 60 Q T = (4329)(17) (60)(1-102)(17) = 1752 - 1040 712 s T + 25 0 42 V T = Vs x Area x C D = (712)(0.12)(0.90) = 77 cu. ft. 575 gallons Use 750 gallon concrete septic tank 61 2/21/84 IMF IFAI PIME MM M MM MMWAMBNMMMW%ZPA�W�� MMP',M='WMMM MEN WE WA VA mommommom mom, ONE WWI deny M SEEM rTn! it gar, Am ��RE 'C"Mr, EWA OF MMMIFAN -Fwbq,. an mww.-q SIR bN WE bo Mull. mu 0 EJEN ME a an man 0 MWER USE noun mossomm man SMIREM ONE" I BOONE 0 I SR4M (man ual) SECT,ION 15M PAPE U EXHIBIT C-2 Features Pump Impeller is recessed 'Tornado* tyfe — operates com.- letely Powerful 4/10 HP Motor is oil filled for good insulation and lubrication of Rotary Shaft Seal has carbon and ceramic faces for positive seal. Micro Switch (SR4A) has per - manent magnet on qwfich arm for v out 0 volute passa%9 giving full opening for flo a and bearin and seal. Overload prolec- bulls don t.in. No sterling switch or Body is stationary, prevents string or trash from winding on seal. activating switch. Ads up to 2 inch dia. Motor Housing is heavy cast iron, relay mechanism. Thrust Washers and Sleeve Bear- Switch Housing (SR4A) is com- pletely sealed from sump liquid, ABS Plastic Operating Switch (SR4A) has steel follower mokled into top for activating switch 0 coated. Stator Is pressed In f0=14'ect alignment, beat heat Ingo are oil lubricated for smooth operation. long pump life. easily removed for replacement it needed. magnet. transfer. Accessories 00: 0 1 C3 0 '. 04 T, Dimensions . Performance Curve Performance Table Total lot 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 11111111011 Motors 1.83 2.44 J.05 3.66 4.27 4 U 5 49 1 610 1 6 71 Gallons Per Hour 6,000 5,500 4,900 4,300 3,600 2,900 2,100 1,200 420 Liters Pot hour 22,710 1 20,818118,547,16,276 13,626110,59817,949 4,542 1,5.90 Performance Cag)abilities ' .apacities to 95 GPM 360 LPM Heads to 19 feet 5.79 meters Pump Down Range* 6 to 6V2 inches 152.4 to 165.1 mm Solid Handling Capability 2 inch dia. solids 50.8 min dia. solids -Liquids. Handled Fresh, drainage effluent waste water Intermittent Liquid Temp. 150OF --T-660C Motor I& HP Electrical 115/230 V., 12.0 A/6.0 A. 1 +, 60 Hertz Discharge 2 inch 1 50.8 nint 'Aulamalk Model. (MWWW PMV VNIM0 with WAM). F.E. Mws Co.. Division of McNeil Corporsilion Ashland. OH 44805 (419) 280-1144 Telex W7443 9, qv land use consultants RECEIVE 0 MAR 2 1 7984 ENGINEERING DRAINAGE STUDY LA FAVE CONDOMINIUM SUBMITTAL DATE: February 21, 1984 D A, 40 G!!T /ONAL 2 / z //,?, y J2, 617 medical -dental bldg. / everett, wa 98201 206/259-2118 U I �. i DRAINAGE STUDY FOR LA FAVE CONDOMINIUM February 21, 1984 1. PEAK RUNOFF RATE FOR 10-YEAR STORM RATIONAL METHOD: Q CIA WHERE.: C = Runoff Coefficient I = Rainfall Intensity A = Acres, Area T = Time of Concentration c EXISTING CONDITIONS A = 0.66-/ 4401 . 5 1 ( 0, C = 0,54(0.20) Landscaped Area + 0.12(0.90) Impervious Area 0.33 0.66 Ground Cover Lawn) T 10 + 270 10 + 5 15.27SIope 1.50,0'9 c 707(0 - 83�K (Exhibit A) 1 10 1.50 . (From Exhibit B)'/ Q10 (0.4)(1.50)(0.66) 0.330*"*T�> II. RUNOFF COEFFICIENT AVERAGE C Dev = 0.26(0.20) + 0.40(0.90) 0.62 0.66 III. MAXIMUM OUTFLOW PER ACRE IMPERVIOUSNESS (CFS/AC Allowable Outflow 0 W—creage -x Runoff Coefficient (CT) 1310 Q 0.5-5 0 0. 66) (U—.67) QO 0.806 IV. STORAGE TIME: The Instant Stora e Begins until the Peak Storage is Attained (MinT T FL2 = -25 + 2 _�1:1— Q Q 0 T = -25 +-\F22�55 .z.13.t 6 . I T -25 + 51 T min. V. VOLUME OF WATER FLOWI G INTO THE RETENTTON BASTN PER ACR IMPERVIOUSNESS (FTJ/AC). .V s = 3607T -- 40 T T + 25 V s = 3607(28) - 40(0.806)(28) 245 + 25 V = 1906 - 903 U s V s 10 0 3 F T'/��4'3 VI. MAXIMUM VOLUME.OF WATER STORED IN RETENTION BASINAFT' V T = V x-Area x C D V T' = 1003 x 0.66 x 0..62 V T = 410 FT'V/ VII. STORAGE PROVIDED IN ON-SITF RETENTION SYSTEM 7P of 3011 CMPA ' 4.91 cu. ft./ft.. = 353 cu. ft, V 51 of 4811 Manhole C..B. @ 12.6 cu. ft./ft. = 63 cu. ft.w,"' TOTAL VOLUME = 416 cu. ft.w-,`� VIII. ORIFICE DESIGN: C a -�r2 g h Where Discharge, efs C = Coefficient of Discharge 0'.62 1--/ a = Area of Orifice, Square Feet g Acceleration of Gravity, Ft. per See. 2 32.2 For 0.33 h 2.96 a Q 0.33 C -�r2gh (0.62) -%[(2)(32.2)(2.96) a 0.0385 Sq. Ft*. a 5.55 Sq. In. w"' r� 2/21/84 Since . a 7rR 2 , Radius = R a 1.33 inches ff 7T �F. D = 2.66 inches IX. BASEMENT SUMP PUMP DESIGN: Area draining to pump: 401 x 1301 (Ramp Area) 5P200 Sq. Ft. Assume Runoff Coefficient = 0.90 A 50-year design storm that produces 1.6 inches of r'ainfall in 6 hours. Total -Runoff Volume = Area x Runoff Coefficient x Rainfall 5t2OO FT 2 (o.9b)(1.6 in.) 1 Ft.,= 624 FT 3_./ .12 in. Sump pump pumping rate = 50 gpm "_ 0.11 cfs (See Exhibit C Total volume pumped in 6 hours (0.11)(6)(60tog 2,376 cu. ft*.ul"" X. DETERMINE -MAXIMUM STORAGE VOLUME REQUIRED AT A CONSTANT FLOW ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE USING THE Y + W METHOD FOR A 25 YEAR STORM. Q 0 Allowable Outflow 0.11 1*. 0 2 Acreage 77unoff Coefficient (0.127T—O.-9-07 T -25 AVL804 = -25i+/1804 = 17%/' go 1.02 V s 4329T - 60. Q 0 T (4329)(17) - (60)(1'.02)(17) 1752 - 1040 712 T + 25 42 V I/ (k— T = V S x Area x C D (712)(0.12)(0.90) = 77 cu. ft. 575 gallons Use 750 gallon concrete septic tank P 3 MA 2/21/84 rm I% M; ra ;-WIWAI ME MEN M==VOJA=mmm WAMEN ANNE FAB VAN INEW M INOFA 001;.IZAE 000 Mom yj 0- m 777 'MAW. X YO, Jit co =-AACo" VOW. WZVTTM�sv- -SA '4040 Ob Z li WA WIC- AND L .7 -7 77- 77- 4-- — -7 -7=- — ----- 1-4-4. - ---j -4-4 'S '7' . . . . . . . . . . ..... WAI r7 7' 00 7- V 1 --4 7 i 7 I V -77 VI ;i 1 Ni, I y 71 X A CD 4 j, V -1111—M, I+ I I I I I z: t t &F Fri 20 30 40 510 460' 70 .80 so /00 EXHIBIT C-1 C'SECTION .PAGE SR4M (manual) IUVI U I Features a I Pump Impeller is recessed 'Tornado* ty — operates com- tely Powerful 4/10 HP Motor is oil filled for good insulation and lubrication of Rotary Shaft Seal has carbon and ceramic faces for positive seal. Micro Switch (SR41A) has per. manant magnet on %vft arm for FI out ofevolute giving uel, opening for flow ofr191iZ%Ue and bearings and seal. Overload protec- bon built-in. No starting switch Body is stationary, prevents string or trash from activating switch. ids up to 2 inch dia. or relay mechanism. winding on seal. Switch Housing (SR4A) is com- ASS Plastic Operating Switch (SR4A) has at" follower molded Motor Housing is heavy cast iron, led. Stator Is pressed in =x8yZ alignment, beat heat Thrust Washers and Sleeve Bear- Inge are oil lubricated for smooth pletely sealed from sump liquid, easil removed for replacement it into top for activating switch magnet. I transfer. operation, long pump life. n=d. . I Accessories Art'. 1W use with'" 4, ""0 0 0 0 .............. �Tl V Ke ------- . . . . . . 4! 3 Dimensions Performance Curve Performance Table Total Feet 2 8 10 1 12 14 16 18 20 22 Need Motors .61 2.44 3 05 3.66 4.27 4.88 5.49 6.10 6.11 Gallons Pot Nour 6,000 5,500 4,900 4,300 Liters Per hour 22,7 10 1 20 1 818 18,547 116 1 276 Performance CaDabilities Capacities to 95 GPM 360 LPM Heads to 19 feet 5.79 meters -Pump Down Ranite 6 to 6V2 inches 152.4 to 165.1 mm Solid Handling Capability 2 inch dia. solids 50.8 mm dia. solids -Liquids Handled Fresh, drainage effluent waste water Intermittent Liquid Temp. 150OF 660C Motor Vio HP Electrical 115/230 V., 12.0 At6.0 A, 1 40, 60 Henz pischarge F 2 inch. 50.8 trim 'Aulamsix: MDdK (momW pxV vanWe Wdh swfth). F.E. Myers Co.. Division of McNeil'Corporation Ashland. OH 44805 (419) 289-1144 Telex W7443 I / r'F/tE DAT E: IEMO TO: Building.Division Communitv DeveloDm"ent DeparLment FROM: Engineerin,(-, Department SUBJECT: After review of the subject Building Permit application, we have the following comments: 1. Connection to City water system required. 2. Connection to Citv sanitary sewer system reouired. 3. Right-of-way Permit required for any work on City property. 4. Driveway slope not to exceed 14'/',. 5. Backwater valve renuired if downstairs T)lumbinf, is helow elevation of iipstream manhole. 6. Water and sewer lines to be separaced bv 10 foot minimum. 7. Builder/Owner responsible for containi.nq all temporary run- off and erosion on site and may not impact neighboring properties in any way. ignature %ft FN r11 � il-4m, ARCH,ITEM INCPS. !250 BANK of CALIFORNIA CENTER SFATTLE, WASHINCTON 9810-1 TELEPHONE. 206-624-6538 q 1983 ENGINEERiNG C.g 1 V JAN Z 7984 FILE CITX 'OF January 23, 1984 City of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, WA 98020 Attn: Departments of Planning, Engineering, & Construction Subject: 19 Unit LaFave Condominium ADB-106-83 201, 207, 215, & 221 Third Avneue N. Edmonds, WA Ladies and Gentlemen: . - The three drawings for the subject project entitled: Sheet 1 of 3 - Parking garage, Site Development and Grading Plan; Sheet 2 of 3 - 1st Floor Plan, Planting Plan, and Plant List; Sheet 3 of 3 - 3rd Floor Partial Plan, Second Floor Plan, and Exterior Elevations were prepared for the architectural design board review process, and are preliminary only. Since the January 4, 1984 meeting of the Architectural Desigq 'B-65—rd-,our -fi'rm-- hat-bbeh 'removed as the architect of record for tKe'"subj ec t proj ec f a h , d as such has not provided'any construc , tion documents. AT&*d6`kr'6i tects,' Inc. , P. S. speci f i cal ly di scl aim's any-re�ponsibility for continued use of the above mentioned pre- liminary drawings for the construction of the project. By copy of this letter to the owners, Bessie and John Mc"Graw,'we are hereby advising them that they are prohibited from using our. title block or in any way representing that Lambert L. deMers, Jr. or AT&de Architects, Inc., P.S. is the architect of recordon' this project. Very truly yours, AT&Je �R'CH�TECT�Aw- /1� S. f e J "N s Pe d e fn tde/rbw cc:.. -Bessie & John McGraw Warren Otteson Larry Johnson' 1, Jerry Edlund Dick Beselin, 1108 12th Avenue N., Edmonds, stated that this building is very similar to Building #9, Munson Manufacturing Building, at Harbor Square. It will be almost identical to Building #9, except it will be a foot higher due to the 100 year flood plain restrictions. He said the comments concerning the dumpster, electrical meter painting, and screening for any mechanical equipment would be taken care of. Natalie Shippen, 1022 Euclid, Edmonds, asked where the sign would be located on the building. Mr. Pederson stated that no information on signs had been provided, but all signs would have to be approved by the ADB. She said she wondered why sign locations were not asked for at the time building approval is granted, since they are a signifi- cant design factor. Mr. Pederson said that was not a requirement for building approval Mr. Hintz responded that very often tenants of buildings are unknown at the time build- ing approval is granted, therefore, the issue of signs must be separated from the issue of the building. Ms. Shippen said that the location of the sign might be known even though the detail of the sign was unknown. Mr. Pederson explained that each sign application is very individual and some people may ask for something that is not in the code. The ADB has the responsibility to review that and grant exceptions if warranted. Ms. Shippen asked if the Board didn't have the responsibility to ask for a coherent sign package in a development such as this. Mr. Pederson said the Board was guided by the sign code. Ms. Shippen said she considered the sign a major design factor, especially in a development of this size, not necessarily the design itself, but the location of the sign is a significant item, and wonders why the subject was not addressed when the buildings started coming before the Board. Mr. Pederson reminded Ms. Shippen that people have the option to ask for variances from the sign code regardless of what the code states or what the Board should say. Ms. Shippen said the lack of a Board approved sign package for the development has resulted in the question of a 14 foot height being adequate. Mr. Pederson pointed out the Board does not have a problem in handling signs. Suddenly, the Board is being told they have a big problem with signs, but that is not accurate. The Board has been given the authority to grant exceptions to the code according to the Board's judgement. The applicant also has the right, if their sign application'is denied, to appeal that decision. Any citizen has the opportunity to appeal any decision of the Board. Mr. Beselin stated that an overall sign plan for the project was submitted and was approved by the ADB. He added that it was stated at the time of the submission before the City Council and he said again that the sign code is not adequate. The Council agreed. The Code does not address specific issues or specific areas. Harbor Square has made every attempt to conform and stay within the sign code. Where there are exceptions or situations that the sign code does not address, their concern has been clear. Mr. Beselin added that he had asked to be made a part of the discussion on the 27th of February to give input from their perspective as to how the signs should.be in Harbor Square. The last thing Harbor Square wants is something that is obtrusive to the neighborhood and to the project. Mr. Beselin also concurred with the statement made by the Board, there is no way to know in advance where a sign will be on the building, whether it will be a single or multi -use building, what color the sign will be, what size or any other factor, since they do not know what business would be occupying the building. Mr. Pederson said, in answer to an earlier question from Ms. Shippen, there is a window requirement on all buildings, a minimum, must be placed where the building can be di- vided up for tenants. Mr. Pederson agreed with Ms. ShiPDen's request to insure there is adequate space provided for signage, so tenants cannot come*to the Board salving., there is not enough room for signs. Mr. Parsons said that in the landscaping, due to the minimum amount of space involved, we have normally required ground cover to be in the planting beds, therefore. he re- commended ground cover in these planting beds of ivy or what has been required in the other landscaping areas. These should be 4" pots, 18" on center to provide adequate coverage. Mr. Finke stated as part of the Master Landscaping Plan, one of the notes read "all beds shall receive English Ivy, 1 gallon, 24" on center unless otherwise noted." Mr. Pederson closed the hearing since there were no further comments from those present. MR. HERMAN MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. BECK, THAT ADB-103-83 BE APPROVED WITH THE EXCEPTIONS NOTED IN THE DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING THE LIGHTING, DUMPSTER AND ELECTRICAL METER, SINCE THE DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND SATISFIES THE CRITERIA AND PURPOSES OF CHAPTER 20.10 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. LaFon returned to the Board. ADB-106-83 LA FAVE CONDOMINfUM (BESSIE AND JOHN MCGRAW) - Review of site plan, landscape plan, and elevations for 19-Unit condominium aFM ",07,215, and 221 3rd Ave. N. (RM-1.5) Mr. Finke showed overhead projections of the proposed development as he read the staff review. The site is flat and presently occupied by three single-family residences. Each of the residential sites has landscaping of various trees and shrubs. The site ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 2 - January 4, 1984 measures about 120 feet by�240 feet or 28,800 square feet. Yehicular access to the building will be from the alley north of Bell St. and West of 3rd Avenue N. The alley is 16 feet wide, which does not meet the requirements of the Community Development Code for the width of a two-way access street or alley serving a 10-unit or larger multi- family dwelling. The alley must be changed to a one-way operation or widened to at least 22 feet to serve the subject development. Changing the alley to a one-way opera- tion will require the action of the City Council. There is also the possibility of application for a variance to have a smaller alley. There is a letter before the City Council at this time but no hearing date has been set. Pedestrian access to the site and building is from 3rd Avenue N. and the alley. The area of the building footprint is a little under 13,000 square feet. The height is 23.9 feet. except for mechanical equipment, which exceeds maximum allowable building height and must be revised to conform to code. There is a stucco exterior, with limited spots of cedar siding. Seven conservatories are provided on both 2nd and 3rd floors. Roofing will be tile or metal. Thirty-eitfttstall underground parking garage, including ten compact spaces and one handicapped space is provided. Thirty-eight spaces are required. Setbacks - seventeen feet on Bell Street; fifteen feet on 3rd Avenue N.: fifteen feet on alley; and 17.5 feet on north side. Lot coverage is almost 45%, the maximum allowable. Nineteen walk lights located at various places on walks. Trash dum.pster with 6 foot high wood screen fence located off of south end of alley. Electrical meter location not indicated on plan. Meter must be painted to match building. Roof -mounted mechani- cal equipment as indicated exceeds maximum allowable building height. It must be re- vised to conform to Code and be completely screened from view. The horizontal cross- section of the elevator penthouse, which is permitted to extend a maximum of three . feet above the maximum allowable building height, exceeds the Zoning Code area require- ments for such cross sections and must be revised to meet the Code. The requirement is that no more than 72 square :feet of horizontal cross-section can extend 3 feet above the maximum allowable height. Mr. Finke's calculations show 98 square feet. The landscaping is indicated on the plan before the Board. One V9" high by 4 foot long double-faced, sandblasted, wood freestanding sign, 2'6" height above finish grade. The word "La Fave" will be in dark blue raised letters on a gray background. The word "Condominiums" and the building address will be in black letters. This sign will be illuminated by two spot fixtures. It will be located near the southeast corner of the site. One V2" high by 2'8" long similar sign will be located near the southwest corner of the site. The lettering and colors will be the same as for the other sign. The Engineering report indicates the parking layout as proposed is acceptable. The maximum grade to be allowed into the garage is 14%. The alley must be paved to its maximum adjacent to the project. The questions of the directional flow in the alley will have t be settled prior to issuance of any permits. A development plan must be submitted and approved, and the appropriate bonds posted prior to issuance of any permits. The staff finds in relation to the question as to whether this project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted City policies, Section 15.20.005(C)(2) states that "stereotyped, boxy multiple -unit residential (RM) buildings are to be avoided." The staff believes that the proposed structure is very massive and bulky and that the stated policy might be better achieved with two smaller structures. The subject development meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, except for rooftop mechanical equipment, and elevator penthouse which was previously mentioned. These items must be revised to meet the Code. There is no evidence that the subject develop- ment satisfies the criteria and purposes of Chapter 20.10.070(A)(4) of the City of Edmonds Community Development Code, which states that "long, massive, unbroken, or monotonous buildings shall be avoided in order to comply with the purposes of this chapter, to allow light and air to the occupants of the development, and to provide spacefor landscaping and recreational facilities." Again the staff feels that the building is long, massive and bulky. Any action by the ADB to approve -the subject development must be contingent on approval by the Hearing Examiner of a conditional use permit for grading; action by the City Council to make the alley one-way or dedi- cation and widening of the ally as required by the Engineering Department for two-way operation; or a variance of that from the Hearing Examiner; and. revision of all roof- top items to conform to the Community Development Code. Mr. Finke passed around a colored rendering of the project. Warren Otteson, the owner's representative, 7935 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, intro- duced Mrs. Bessie McGraw and her son and wife, Mr. & Mrs. John McGraw. the applicants; and, the project architecti, Mr. Larry deMers. Mr. Otteson said there had been three meetings with the staff and complimented the staff for their cooperation. In examining 3-4 options on the property . the staff had.only recently indicated that the final design was a problem as outlined in the staff report. if one is looking at the repro- ductions of the elevations that were supplied with the drawings, one could hurriedly construe that the building is long and massive. However, we have built this building in keeping with sound environmental considerations, with the traffic situation con- sidered, -and in keeping with your ordinance. Mr. Otteson pointed to a portion of the building on the colored rendering as the portion which may have occasioned the objec- tion of the Planning Department. The building is 23 feet 9 inches high, the Harbor ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 3 - January 4, 1984 Master is approximately one and a half feet higher, as is the apartment on the end of the block. Light and air circulation between the two structures is 17.6 as reported by Mr. Finke. but there is an additional 7 feet between the actual structure, giving an actual 24 to 25% open area between the existing building and the proposed building. The building has been articulated throughout. The word stereotype generaly has the connotation and definition of a structure containing little variation. We believe the building does meet the overall code of disigning a building in keeping with the sur- rounding structures as mentioned in the Code. Mr. Otteson read from the Code "design and construct homes with architectural lines which enable them to harmonize with their surroundings, adding to the community identity and desirability. Minimize en- croachment on view of existing homes by the new construction. Require the new resi- dential development be compatible with the natural constraints of slope. soil, geologi- cal,.vegetation and drainage." Mr. Otteson said they believe they have subscribed to those goals and purposes. Finally, the owners asked that a very contemporary, cement building or modern building not be designed, but one in which the owners can live. The property has been owned by them and they have been residents in the community since 1915. The owners are located on the site presently. The development has been a dream for some time and the owners hope to see the dream realized in 1984. Mr. Otteson indi- cated that the colors and finishes of the building were very closely depicted in the artists's conception. have been pre -selected; stucco color trimmed in soft blue -gray. The rust color was the artist's concept of drapes in the building, but drapes of this color are not planned. After the fourth review with the City staff. when Mr. Otteson became aware of the issue reported by the staff. the application was removed from the December agenda. A study of the request now before the Board to split the project into two buildings, proved that the cost of each unit would be raised approximately $11,000 or a total cost of an additional $175,000 for the development. Mr. Otteson could not advise the McGraw's to proceed because the economic impact on the project would almost preclude its success. Mr. Otteson asked the Board to consider the application for approval. Mr. Pederson asked why an application for final approval was before the Board, rather than for preliminary approva�. Mr. Finke replied that a suggestion had been made that a preliminary approval be requested, but the applicant had asked for a final. Mr. Otteson replied that they were told the first response by the City would be from the ADB. He also said a suggestion was made that the City Council be approached on the subject of the alley being made one-way. They believe there is support among those affected for making the alley one-way. There was some discussion as to whether the application should be preliminary or final approval. Mr. Otteson asked that the application be considered a final approval. Larry deMers. AIA, 1250 Bank of California Center, Seattle, stated that the elevator penthouse could conform to the required area. Lenore Collins, 200 2nd Avenue N., Edmonds, asked if this were high or low density? Mr. Finke replied that it was high density multiple, RMI.5 (1500 square feet per dwelling unit). Ms. Collins then asked what the square footage was for low density multiple? Mr. Finke replied it would be 3000 square feet/d.u. Ms. Collins said she does not consider the building bulky or stereotyped, but very attractive. To split the building would cost the developer extra and would leave a narrow, dead space, leading from 3rd Avenue to her parking space at the Harbor Master. There would be an area at night where people can gather; now, people are going up and down the alley and getting into the Harbor Master. The narrow space would not be a safe feature. She feels the safety factor would cancel out this idea. The size of lots are not ade- quate for two buildings and she objected to the space between two buildings. The direction of alley traffic is also of concern to Ms. Collins. At this time, there is a lot of traffic in the alley and the alley narrows at the North end which concerned Ms. Collins. Harley O'Neil, 21801 Nootke Road, Edmonds, stated that he is a partner in the building to the north of the projected building, which contains 20 units on a lot that is approx. imately one fourth the size of this project. The building was erected at a time when Codes allowed a higher structure and allowed more units per square foot. He said he believes that 19 units is less than would be allowed by Code at present. Upon first learning ofthe project, he said he was impressed by the attractiveness of,the desion and believes it will blend in with his building, which is stucco. He said the alley is very narrow, and traffic from both the north and south cannot be accommodated. A pro- posal of one-way traffic to the north will be supported by their partnership. He disa- greed with the findings that this would be a massive structure. He said as property owners to the north of the project. they are supporting it and hope the ADB will do the same. In response to a question from the Board, Mr. O'Neil said their garage entrance is from 3rd Ave. but they exit by way of the alley to save backing out unto 3rd Ave. Ron Johnson, 2360 N. W. 204th. Seattle, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Johnson does not believe the proposal to split the project into two buildings would get away from the mass or bulk of the project. In addition, putting two buildings there would ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Page 4 - January 4, 1984 place the buildings closer to the street on Bell and closer to the buildings on the north side, and would create an area 10-:15 feet wide and 24 feet high like a tunnel between them. Movtng the buildings closer to the street and other buildings would create a greater effect of bulk. The site plan now provides for an open area for ped- estrian use at the corner of 3rd and.Bell, Two buildings would make it necessary to take up a lot of that space, Space has been allowed in the rear to alleviate builki- ness by excavating for parking. He believes the design has taken into account the problem areas and provided a good solution. J. Ward Phillips, 522 Dayton. Edmonds, wanted to continue what two others have done, who have adjoin-ing property to the project. He pointed out that one building is a rectangle and the other is approximately a square, both built when 35 foot height was allowed. The block is high density and is almost entirely at the 35 foot height. There is no height problem with this building. there is no mass that will appear from the building, it will appear secondary to what is already built. The immediate silhouette of the building behind it, to the west. is taller and is the predominant building on the block. Whether you leave this building as one or cut it in two, it will not be seen. it is not the dominant feature of the block. If the property stood alone, it could start to sound heavy, but he said he does not see anything heavy about the building, considering it an outstanding job, an example of what.he likes to see going on in town. He said there are examples of buildings that have been divided in two like the one on Maple Street. and the division did not relieve anything. The build. ing is huge and overbears on a person when walking by, with the first 10-15 feet solid concrete, right up against the street. it is long and there are no movements in the building. The building was cut in half, but that did not serve a purpose. He expressed concern with the idea that is current that buildings must be cut in half. He said he believes this project fulfills the Code and the architect has done an out- standing job on the way they have designed the building, He said he had gone by the property on Maple Street for over 25 years and has watched the changes that have taken place. He said the McGraws will be owner -occupants, their family going back three generations on this property. They are not developers. He believes they are trying to create another asset for this town. He urged approval of the project. He added that the alley is a problem, but that is not caused by this design. Whether this development is approved or not, the alley is a problem. He said the alley needs help and it is a City problem since it is a legal alley. In going to the City Council, they are trying to relieve the problem. He thanked the McGraws for what they have done so far, and hopes the project will go forward. Mr. Otteson commented that they are proposing taking the overhead utilities and putting them underground. substantially cleaning up the alley. Dode Peterson, 325 Walnut, Edmonds, stated she had been a resident of Edmonds for 25 years and is interested in its progress and thanked the ADB for the care and consider- ation in what they have done for the City. She said people go from one extreme to the other in protecting the City, saying we do not want any more bulk, no more large cement buildings. etc., until a fault is reached and they start saying let's have a couple of smaller buildings here and let's cut this one up. To say that the proposed building is anything but a beautiful structure that will upgrade the downtown area would be a mistake. She expressed her hope the ADB would take into consideration all that had been done in carefully placing and planning the building. and cleaning up the alley. As a resident and neighbor of the building. she hoped the ADB would con- sider the building very carefully. Mr. deMers commented that the owners had committed to spend a great deal of money to put the parking spaces underground. As a result of that decision, there is 39.8% landscaped area. In Section 20, he quoted "to comply with the purposes of this Chapter, allow light and air to the occupants of the development, and provide space for landscaping and recreational facilities." He said the building project complies with this aspect, in his opinion, in that all parking is underground allowing more landscaping than if that had not been the case. Mr. Hintz asked the staff and legal counsel if the zoning ordinance allows primary access off alleys? Mr. Finke replied that the ordinance does allow for this. Mr. Parsons asked if the alley were a public right-of-way and what the right-of-way space was. Discussion followed among Board members regarding current use of.alleys for access by high density buildings, Mr, Tanaka, City Attorney. explained that there is no difference between streets and alleys used for access, The only difference lies in the width of the right-of-way and pavement width. An alley must meet the right-of-way and pavement width provided in the Code. he said, and this is what is going before the City Council. Mr. Hintz commented that he is, ordinarily. impressed with the acuity of the staff in interpreting the design aspects of the Code. How- ever, in this case, he finds the proposed building attractive and meeting the require- ments of the Code and would be concerned if the building were required to be split in two. He added that it is an articulated building, not boxy or stereotyped. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Paqe 5 - January 4, 1984 Mr. Herman asked, if the buildi'.n_o could,be built, should -the Cit ' v deny the development's request for a one-way street? In response, Mr. Otteson said there would be a problem if the alley must be widened to 22 feet. Mr. Parsons said the vehicular access can substantially change the lay -out of the site plan, since it could modify the actual ingress and egress, which in turn would modify the building and in turn could modify the landscaping. He stated he could review this as a perliminary plan, but felt reluctant to approve it as a final plan. Mr. Otteson said they do not like what they foresee happening if the alley request is not approved. The ramp of the parking garage would move forward, to gain adequate width -in the alley for two-way traffic, a section of the building would be moved for- ward (indicated on the colored rendering of the building). He also said there was too much traffice on 3rd Avenue to access the parking from ihat street. Bell street, he said, is another alternative; they are looking carefully at the aesthetics of the corner. Mr., Beck asked for the distance between the street and the leading edge of that portion of the building that would be moved if the alley were widened. Mr. Otteson said the building would have to be moved forward 6 feet, leaving 17 feet. Mr. Otteson asked for the approval of the application subject to the considerations that have been mentioned by the Board to enable them to appear before the City Council. Mr. LaFon said the entry is not in character with the building. Mr. Otteson said there would be double doors and slit windows on each side of the doors. Mr. Otteson, in response to inquiry from Mr. LaFon, said the triangular decks off the bedrooms were more ventilation decks rather than a functional deck. Mr. LaFon suggested that a request for a setback adjustment would allow the decks to stick out 2-3 feet giving better useage and would also break up the mass of the building. fir. LaFon also asked what the detail was between the stucco and windows. Mr. deMers replied it would be a thermo break aluminum window, an insulated glass and would probably be trimmed out with a.shadow strip of wood or a U-shaped aluminum to emphasize the strength of it. Mr. LaFon said he did not believe there was a problem with the elevators, since there are handicapped elevators that require I- Ik foot run and would only stick out the roof that much. 11r. Pederson asked if the green houses would be built one over the other? Mr. deMers said they would cantilever about 18" out from the building in the front, and pointed out the detail on plans before the Board. Ms. Collins said there are no 2-way alleys in Edmonds. If the approval for the project is dependent on whether the alley is one-way or not, you cannot withhold approval for that reason, that is the City's problem, and the alley cannot be made into a 2-way alley. Mr. Phillips said he was confused by the procedures the Board was sharing, in the sense that the Alley is a Code situation, does not understand what the design of the alley has to do with the ADB. In addition, he said, if the Board gave final approval, and something was changed in the building, would the applicant not have to come back to the ADB for approval of the change. If that is correct, Mr. Phillips said, the appli- cant is appropriately asking for final approval. If the Board prefers that a prelimi- nary approval be sought first, Mr. Phillips does not believe the community is aware that that procedure is in effect. Mr. Pederson replied that the Board does like to see a preliminary in order to comment on the project, in order that the applicant can appear before the City Council if necessary, and when that is all accomplished the applicant may appear before the ADB for final approval. Mr. Phillips said he thought it would be helpful if that procedure could go out through City Council resolution to clarify the general understanding. He added that he would encourage that procedure but did not think it was a mandatory requirement and asked the City Attorney if the applicant is allowed to be present for final approval. Mr. Tanaka replied that they could ask for final approval at this time; the Code provides for an option in that the applicant may ask for preliminary approval and receive comments and advice from the ADB to save spending -money for plans that may not be acceptable to the Board. He added, there is currently no requirement that a preliminary plan be submitted before final approval can be given. However, the Board does not have to give final approval Just.because an applicant asks for it. Mr. Pederson closed the Public Hearing. In discussing the alley traffic. the Board decided this was an Engineering problem and decided to leave the issue in the hands of the City Engineer. MR. LAFON MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HINTZ, ADB-106-83 BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED 14ITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF THE ENTRY WAY AND.WINDOW.TRIM BEING MODIFIED..AS DISCUSSED AND THE TYPE OF ROOF BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR FEBRUARY; SINCE THE BOARD DOES NOT FIND THAT SECTION 15.20.005(C)(2) APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT NOR DOES CHAPTER 20.10.070(A)(4) APPLY. MOTION CARRIED. ARCHITECTURAL DESIC-N BOARD Page 6 - January 4,1984 December 30, 1983 MEMO TO: PLANNING DEPT. FROM: DAN SMITH ENGINEERING SUBJECT: ADB COMMENTS FOR JANUARY 4, 1984 MEETING 1. ADB-103-83 Harbor Square, Building #7 As in a number of other buildings on this site, a number of the parking. stalls back into the main access/traffic*road. This will.make a conflict situation that may cause some minor traffic flow problems.*See page 2 2. ADB-106-83 LaFave Condominiums @ 201, 207, 215, 211 3rd Avenue N. The parking layout as proposed is acceptable. The maximum grade to be allowed into the garage is 14%. The alley must be paved to its maximum adjacent to the project. The questions of the directional flow in the alley will have to be settled prior to issuance of any permits. A development plan must be submitted and approved, and the appropriate bonds posted prior to issuance of any permits. 3. ADB-62-83 Existing Signs at Dairy Queen Drive-in @ 7530 212th St. No Comment 4. ADB-88-83 Planned Residential Development of Homeland Homes The engineering requirements as set with the plat are attached. 5. ADB-112-83 Existin Signs at McDonald's Drive-in @ 10124 Edmonds Wa No Comment 6. ADB-113-83 Edmonds National. Bank @ 125 3rd Avenue S. This site layout as submitted appears acceptable. A right turn only will be allowed leaving the site from the drive-thru exit. As proposed, the plan requires three curbcuts on 3rd Avenue S. Per Section 18.80.060 (C)(4) only two are allowed. Engineering would not object to the plan as submitted. Also, all unused curbcuts must.be replaced and all damaged curb/guttet/si.dewalk adjacent to the property must be replaced. A development plan must be submitted and approved, and the' appropriate bonds posted prior to issuance of any permits. 7. ADB-96-83 New Freestanding Sign (Bria-n--71-etterberq, D.D.S.) No Comment 0 r107y (OF R-MMONOS 200 DAYTON ST. * EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 * (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL June 15, 1,982 Ms. Bessie McGraw 201-3rd Ave. No. Edmonds) WA 98020 HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 04;� 1 -11,1141 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Blk. 8 Plat of Edmonds (4344) Re : ,, 2, Ajid�� Edmonds, WA 98020 Dear Resident: On February 17, 1981, the Edmonds City Council passed Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction, and repair of deteriorated sidewalks. A letter dated March 16, 1981 was sent to residents that were required to repair the sidewalk abutting their property. The improvement of sidewalks in need of repair at the expense of the abutting property owner is provided by City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35 .68. The areas needing repair have been marked in paint on the sidewalk adjoining your property. Reconstruction permits must be obtained from the Building Department at 501 Bell Street within 30 days upon receipt of this certified letter. The fee for the sidewalk repair has been waived by the City of Edmonds. In the event these improvements are not completed within ninety (90) days upon receipt of this certified letter, the City will employ a private contractor to perform the designated repairs arid.the City will bill the abutting property owner. This action is in response to many citizen requests and pedestrian falling accidents which have been increasing in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration and increased pedestrian traffic. If you have any questions, please call Bobby Mills at 771-3202, ext. 289. Sincerely, JOHN B. MITCHELL Superintendent of Public Works BM/ml 0 9, CITY OF IE-OMONDS HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL June 15, 1982 Mr. & Mrs. Harley O'Neil 17844-8th N.W. Seattle, WA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lots 5 & 6, Blk. 8 Plat of Edm-o,nd.s--,-(434.4) Re: r ,�f&--�4v-e- NoX APAV Edmonds, WA 980�-O Dear Resident: On February 17, 1981, the Edmonds City Council passed Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction, and repair of deteriorated sidewalks. A letter dated March 16., 1981 was sent to residents that were required to repair the sidewalk abutting their property. The improvement of sidewalks in need of repair at the expense of the abutting property owner is provided by City ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 35.68. The areas needing repair have been marked in paint on the sidewalk adjoining your property. Reconstruction permits must be obtained from the Building Department at 501 Bell Street within 30 days upon receipt of this certified letter. The fee for the sidewalk repair has been waived by the City of Edmonds. In the event these improvements are not completed within ninety (90) days upon receipt of this certified letter, the City will employ a private contractor to perform the designated repairs and the City will bill the abutting property owner. This action is in response to many citizen requests and pedestrian falling accidents which have been increasing in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration and increased pedestrian traffic. If you have any questions, please call Bobby Mills at 771-3202, ext. 289. Sincerely, JOHN B. MITCHELL Superintendent of Public Works BM/ml & Z U 0 U 0 I — Z 0 W-J V) 0 1 , CITY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. *Address or vicinity of nstruction — 9'_:� / X L'Je 'h. Owner: Name ,_-;, 2 tle xJ Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code e Contractor:7�9y-rLi '.Ienisev) Name A4 A) Mailing Adclress,,', City, State, Zip Code ^ I . Permit No. ��-4r ie Date 9 Permit Issued To: Type -of Work to be Done': �V'o /,/(J Work in Connection With: 0 Sub or Plat X Single Family El Comml. / Ind. 1� Apt. Condo. Pavement Cut: ;"E� Yes No State License Numb-r 7 Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Controlto be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit rqy,st be availaWe at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature �7 Date Owner or Agent--'__�' THIS PERMIT MUST BE POS D AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Time Authorized: Void after 00 days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: 411'1)0'1��_4� Security Deposit: Receipt No.: . Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X — * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 - Route cony to Street Dept. Comments: Diagram: Contractor called for inspection Work DisaPproved By: Work Approved By: Inspector: Yes NO Date: Bv: Date: Date: Enq. Div. December 1978 HARVE H. HARMSON CITY OF EMNAMIMI..""', 200 DAYTON ST EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS IMarch .16, .1981 S FILE Dear Resident: On February 17, 1981, the Edmonds City Council passed' Resolution 488 for construction, roc(.-)nstruction and repair of deteriorated sidewalks. A VILIMAC hearinq will be held in the Council Chambers at the Civic Center on April 21,1981 at 7:30 P.m. You are invited to attend ! I 1.-, 1. I' � . I -this hearing for discussing ;' repair of portions of deteriorated sidewalk abutting you''r*,pr'o . perty;` 'The improvcmcmit �q of 'sld�w'alj�s in need of repair at the expense of the abutting propertv pwner is provided bv City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and Revised Code of Washington, Chaptor 315.68. The areas needing repair have heen marked in paint on the sidewalk adjoining your proT)et.t-.y. Roconstruction and repair of these sidewalks must ho crmipl.et-ed on or before September 1, 1981. In the event J ]mr)r(-)v(!mentb are not completed within the above specified ti-le city vjill perform and complete the at*- the nxpense nF the aL�jttinq property owner. This action is' in response to many citizen requests and pedestrian falling accidents which have been increasing in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration and increased pedestrian traffic. Sincerely, PRI-:1) F' . HERZBERG Director of Public Works 0 �j1j4L.,rj_)i&AA9,F SIM.- /JJS, J7 Z2 7H Z T) Z, Z 7. 3280 Old Millers Lane P.O. Box 16347 - Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 SUMP/SEWAGE BASINS COMPARE THESE FEATURES LIV *1144 Available in high density polyethylene or fiberglass Idea[ for residential, commercial and industrial applications. Complete with necessary sealing hardware and flanges. Available with 2" or 3" vent and 2" or 3" discharge. Gasketed lid and 4" cast iron caulk inlet hub with anti -corrosion coating are included with the basin. Centerline of hub is located 9" from top of basin allowing longer cycle. Durable steel gasketed cover standard on simplex and duplex basins. • One-piece, seam -free construction. • Duplex covers include two pump plates and inspection plate. • Polyethylene basins are approved by the Iriter- national Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (lAPMO). • Ready to install for economical and simple installation. • Dimensional Engineering data available. • Conversion kit to convert vent or discharge size is available. CONSULT FACTORY FOR LARGER SIZE BASINS OR SPECIAL APPLICATIONS. SIMPLEX BASIN 18" x 30" Polyethylene and Fiberglass 24" x 30" Polyethylene and Fiberglass SIMPLEX BASIN and COVER INCLUDES: 1 — 2" or 3" vent flange 1 — 2" or 3" discharge flange 1 — 4", cast-iron inlet hub 1 — cord seal And all gasketing and hardware DUPLEX BASIN 30" x 36" Polyethylene and Fiberglass 36" x 36" Polyethylene and Fiberglass DUPLEX BASIN and COVER INCLUDES: 1 — 2" or 3" vent flange 2 — 2" or 3" discharge flanges 1 — 4" cast iron inlet hub 2 — cord seals 2 — pump plates 1 — inspection plate And all gasketing and hardware FM 487 1283 BASINS and COVERS SIMPLEX POLYETHYLENE BASINS DUPLEX POLYETHYLENE BASINS Ordering Dia. Depth Vent Dischg. Ship. Ordering Dia. Depth Vent Dischg.1 Ship. KI—K., tin I tin % tin % tin I wt 11 kl—k— If. % ft. % /I. % 1.- 1 W6 31-0035 18 30 2 2 35 31-0043 30 36 2 2 104 31-0036 18 30 3 3 35 31-0044 30 36 3 3 104 31-0037 18 30 2 3 35 31-0045 30 36 2 3 104 31-0038 18 30 3 2 35 31-0046 30 36 3 2 j04 .31-0039 24 30 2 2 80 31-0047 36 36 2 2 1go 31-0040 24 30 3 3 80 31-0048 36 36 3 3 150 31-0041 24 30 2 3 80 31-0049 36 36 2 3 150 31-0042 24 30 3 2 80 31-0050 36 36 3 2 150 SIMPLEX FIBERGLASS BASINS DUPLEX FIBERGLASS BASINS Ordering Dia. Depth Vent Dischg. Ship. Ordering Dia. Depth Vent Dischg. Ship. Number (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) wt. Number (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) wt. 31-0000 18 30 2 2 39 31-0071 30 36 2 2 117 31-0002 18 30 3 3 39 31-0072 30 36 3 3 117 31-0012 18 30 2 3 39 31-0073 30 36 2 3 117 ;OQ117 18 30 3 2 39 31-0074 30 36 3 7 '6 31 24 30 2 2 84 31-0010 36 36 2 22 1 31-0006 24 30 3 3 84 31-0011 36 36 3 3 166 31-0013 24 30 2 3 84 31-0015 36 36 2 3 166 31-0027 24 30 3 2 84 31-0057 36 36 3 2 166 Vent Flange Cord Seal Discharge Flange Basin Cover or 24" SIMPLEX D-Dia. I.D. E A I BASIN COVERS Inspection Plate Cord Seacl Dis harge Flange Pump Plate Basin Cover 'Vent Flange Basin Cover Z30" or 36" DUPLEX � Avall Is In: Gallon Poly F.G Size Capacity A 8 C D E 18 x 30 30 30" 17" 181, 22" 91, 24 x 30 60 30' 24 26" 30" 91, 30 x 36 1 108 36" 30" 32" 1 36' 91, 36 x 36 159 36" 36" 38" 1 42" SIMPLEX Thickness of Cover Thickness f Basin Wall Density of Basin Size Poly. F.G. Poly. I F.G. Poly. F.G. 18 x 30 .1151, 1 .1151, .200" 1875" 949 (g/cc) 058 (lbs./cubic ft.) 24 x 30 DUPLEX Thickness of Cover Thickness of Basin Wall Density of Basin Size Poly. F.G. Poly. F.G. Poly. F.G. 30 x 36 .125" .125" .230" .1875" (g/cc) (g/cc) ::.9149 .058 (lbs./cubic ft.) /cu 36 x 36 CONSULT FACTORY FOR LARGER SIZE BASINS OR SPECIAL APPLICATIONS. 3280 Old Millers Lane Manufacturers of... P.O. Box 16347 ZZ7ZZ-ZZR- TZ7, / Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 1:�114,117Y IOZIM.Aff SIM-ff ly.7S FM 486 �7zmzlry )o�&Aof-g SINC2- /,F,79 " I - - r 1082 Ar I fflizzZiff z 3280 Old Millers Lane 0 P 0. 1 Box 16347 - Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 ELECTRICAL ALTERNATOR - 668-PAK19 An Electrical Alternator is used on a Duplex pump application where automatic alternation of the pumps is desired for added protection in residential or commercial applications. With one pump operating to handle normal flow, a second pump becomes operational in the event the water level continues to rise. The built-in alarm system, a standard fea- ture, will sound when the second pump be- comes operational. ELECTRICAL ALTERNATOR PANEL Control Panel Features: • Hand -Off -Auto Switch for each pump and alarm. • Run Light for each pump and alarm. • Circuit Breaker for each pump and control circuit. • Magnetic Starter for each pump. • Alternating Relay. Terminal Strip for connecting Pumps 00 and Mercury Float Switches. 0 Nema 1 rating - General purpose control. Specify voltage, phase, and H.P. of pumps when ordering. Order No. Voltage Phase 10-0202 11 5/200-208/230V 1 10-0207 200-208/230V 3 10-0212 460/575V 3 Dimensions: OrderNo. Length Width Depth wt. 10-0202 14" 12" 51/2" 32# 10-0207 20" 16" 71/2" 55# 10-0212 20" 16" 71/2" 60# Consult factory for: Weatherproof — Nema 3 Raintight — Nema 3R Watertight — Nema 4 Dust -tight — Nema 5 Explosion -Proof — Nema 10 ZZ71-ZZI-R TZ7A.F 3280 Old Millers Lane P. 0. Box 16347 Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 Manufacturers of. . DUPLEX ELECTRICAL ALTERNATING SYSTEM "E-PAK" ELECTRICAL ALTERNATOR PUMP POWER SUPF CONTROL & ALAF POWER SUPP NOTE: ALARM - C( CIRCUIT SHO SEPARAT PUMP 2" OR 3" DISCHARG FLOOR FLANGE ZOELLER FIBERGLASS OR POLYETHYLENE BASIN ZOELLER MERCUR� FLOAT SWITCI�- (10-0225) ITCHES -AMPS _ER UNICHECK K VALVE 51) 4" HUB INLET "ALARM -OVERRIDE LEVEL" BOTH PUMPS "ON" ALARM BELL "ON" )N" LEVEL PUMPS -TERNATE OPERATION kCH CYCLE E ZOELLER SEWAGE PUMP SYSTEM SELECTION GUIDE FF"LEVEL PUMPS "E PAK" H.P. RATING FOR SWITCH MECHANISM IN "E-PAK" MERCURY FLOAT SWITCH No. Req. Voltage and Phase No. Req. Product No. No. Req. Product No. .(2) 115V/200-208/230V (1) 10-0202 2 H.P. or less (3) 10-0225 1 Ph Non -Automatic (2) 200-208/230V (1) 10-0207 5 H.P. or less (3) 10-0225 1 or 3 Ph Non -Automatic (2) 460/575V (1) 10-0212 7.5 H.P.-or less (3) 10-0226 1 13 Ph Non -Automatic I I *Additional options — (2) Zoeller Unicheck (30-0151), Zoeller Fiberglass or Polyethylene Basin. Standard enclosure is Nema 1, general purpose control. Consult factory for: weatherproof, watertight, raintight, dust -tight, and explosion -proof Nema ratings. 3280 Old Millers Lane Manufacturers of ... P.O. Box 16347 Z7Z1-ZZ)-7 TZ7. Louisville, Kentucky 40216 Z (502) 778-2731 F1,014Cr �L'14LITJ- �aVAIIU S11W.- /999 IZZ71Z 3280 Old Millers Lane P 0. Box 16347 - Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 COMPARE THESE FEATURES • Vortex Impeller Design • Float operated, submersible (N E MA 6) mechanical switch. • Durable cast construction. Cast iron switch cap, motor shell, pump housing, base and impeller. No sheet metal parts to rust or corrode. • Stainless steel screws, bolts, float rod, handle, guard, and arm and seal assembly. • UL-approved 3-wire neoprene cord and plug. 10 ft. cord standard for automatic. 15 ft. cord standard for non -automatic. • Thermal protected. • Oil filled motor— hermetically sealed. • 60 cycle, 1725 RPM. • Carbon and ceramic shaft seal. • Sleeve bearing running in bath of oil. • Passes 2-inch solids (sphere). • 211 NPT Discharge. o On point — 11". • Off point — 3". • Major width 12Y2". • Height-14". SIMPLEX AND DUPLEX SYSTEMS AVAILABLE . PACKAGED SYSTEMS AVAILABLE Z2 7tcZ Z i FR Tff. 3280 Old Millers Lane PO. Box 16347 Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 Manufacturers of ... ri-al FM 390 1082 "267" Series "WASTE MATE" SUBMERSIBLE SEWAGEPUMP OR DEWATERING PUMP 2" NPT DISCHARGE WWI Sump & Sewage Pump Mfg. Assoc. SSPMA Specificatlon Number tLISTED SC-2225 FA MODELS AVAILABLE * Automatic or Non -Automatic * Canadian Standards Assoc. * 2" NPT Discharge COO Approval available * Y2 H.P., 1 Ph., 115Vor 230V 0 LA Los Angeles code * Passes 2" Solids Approval available U) cc W F- W LU W LL 0 6 HEAD CAPACITY CURVE "267" SERIES cc W W 2 W W 15' ILL W X U 10, Z 2-- 0 1 51 U.S. I ' I 20 40 60 1 80 GALLONS� LITERS 160 240 320 0 FLOW PER MINUTE 100 1 alit CONSULT FACTORY FOR SPECIAL APPLICATIONS • Electrical alternators for duplex systems available with mercury float switches. • Minimum recommended basin size Simplex-18" x 30". Duplex-36" x 36". • Over 1300F. (540C.) special quotation required. I 11 TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD FEET/METERS CAPACITY GALLONS/LITERS 0 HEAD CAPACITY UNITS/MIN. FEET METERS GAL. LTRS. 5 1.52 108 408 10 3.05 60 227 15 4.57 20 76 18 5.48 0 .0 • High water alarms available. • Mechanical alternators available for duplex systems. Caution: Maximum temp. sewage or 'dewatering-130'F. - 54'C. SINGLE PHASE UNITS Model* H.P. Volts Amps Wt. Al I installation of controls, protection devices and wiring M267 Automatic Y2 115 10 ' 4 5 1 �bs. should be done by licensed and qualified electricians. All D267 A utomatic Y2 230 5.2 51 bs. electrical and safety codes should be followed in addition N267,Non-Automatid Y2 115 10.4 51 bs. to the most recent National Electric Code (NEC) and the E267'Non-Automatic Y2 1230 -- 5.2 51 bs. Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). "M" or no prefix ddsignates Standard, Auto., 115V., I Phase. RESERVE POWERED DESIGN For unusual conditions a reserve safety factor is an engineered/design part of every Zoeller pump. 3280 Old Millers Lane Manufacturers of. . . P.O. Box 16347 ZZ71Z-Z1)-7 TZ7. Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 L 0 0 0 4SWIry /91/ml-W 51wer /Y' 179 Z__ 7 ZZ 3280 Old Millers Lane PO. Box 16347 Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 COMPARE THESE FEATURES • Float is constructed of durable polypropylene encasing mercury switch. • Mercury switch is rated at 10 Am ps-1 15V and 5 Amps-230V. • 15 foot 16/2 Type SJOWA Neoprene Cord -Standard. • Long cords are available in 25-35-50 foot lengths. • Temperature rating of 130* F (540 C). • Approximately 1/2" liquid level differ- ential in switching action. • Mounting strap is included. Mercury Float Switch is normally open when hanging vertically above liquid level. Switch- closes when it reaches a few degrees above the horizontal position. *APPL�CAT�ONS • Switch for Duplex pump control and High Level Alarm on E-Pak electrical alternating system for dewatering, effluent and sewage applications. • �Switch for A -Pak, High Level Alarm !Switch. *For use only with E-Pak and Alarm systems. ZA Z X Z Cff. 3280 Old Millers Lane PO. Box 16347 Louisville, Kentucky 40216 (502) 778-2731 Manufacturers of... FIVI 526 1283 TYPICAL APPLICATIONS � DUPLEX ELECTRICAL ALTERINATING SYSTEM 2" or 3" Discharge ZOELLER Fiber- glass or Poly- ethylene Basin ZOELLER Mercury Float Switch ( 1 0-0225) ZOELLER SewagE Pump SIMPLEX SYSTEM Transformer ZOELLER Fiberglass or Polyethylene Basin — Alarm "ON" Level ZOELLER Mercury Float Switch (10-0225) Pump "ON" Level Pump "OFF" Level "E-Pak"— Electrical Alternator Control Panel ZOELLER Unicheck Check Valve (30-0151) 4" Hub Inlet 'Alarm Override Level" Both Pumps "ON" Alarm Bell "ON" 'ON" Level Pumps Alternate Operation Each Cycle "OFF" Level i can be used on all Zoeller Co. K"— Electrical Alternators. Alarm ZOELLER Unicheck Switch for A -Pak, High Level Alarm Switch. Voltage A -Pak Mercury Float Switch 115V #10-0015 #10-0225 230V #10-0016 For information on additional Zoeller products refer to catalog on Electrical Alternator, FM-486; and Alarm Package, FM-513. 3280 Old Millers Lane Manufacturers of ... P.O. Box 16347 ZAIZZI)-7 TZ7. Louisville, Kentucky 40216 502) 778-2731 0 PUBLIC 'NORKS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIE'd FILE (')AXE H erem"5 '12J -3aQ Mfff) PROJECT NAME: CoUL)ITAPT, FILE ASSESSMENT DATED: AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE: ITIMS". ilbaMT-71p =-- 17 m a NtP�FZ I M1, �. s b4Fda �., LU� Lvj_ Wlk Imi top 7, a re 7L V 74 -W X-iT 7,vlro, floi mil Ff- 1-c- lvp_� ME PREPAR ED BY:l'oss" 14&A-- .—DATE: REVISED: 19,/77LV APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMT EASEMENT No . .......................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION 0 REPAIRS 0 113-04300 OWNER........... RAymand..McGr.aw -------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ...................... ADDRESS ...... ?�l 3rd Avg, N. ............. .......................... BLOCK No . ............................................ .............................................................................................. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . ...... L%- NAMEOF ADDITION ............................................................................................................................ Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE................................................ By ................................................................. APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SEDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No . .......................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION E) REPAIRS 113-04250 OWNER.......... dahn..McGraw. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 215 3rd-!Ave. N. ADDRESS......................... ............................................................................... 10 9 1* 0 -7%-J CONTRACTOR.................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ........... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................ NAMEOF ADDITION ...................................................... .................................................................................. Dye Tested On Sewer 1972 Approved: DATE................................................ By ...................................................................... APPLICATION for The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No . .......................................... NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS 113-04200 OWNER.......... kimond.l....McGraw ...................................................... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ...................... ADDRESS ..... 2()1-..3rd..Ave...-.N - -------------- 0 11 .................................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................ NAMEOF ADDITION ......................................................................................................................................... Dye Tested On Sewdr 1972 Approved: DATE................. .................... : ......... By ...................................................................... rd::7a4117- lt7 It/ i-- 11:2,11 ie�� -tf -3 A2 j-- LL. 0 0 A4 66-j LLJ No 6vy.4tc-,,v I AM) NO Yosr�eoqeew- reT-co.'el 1-Y eleel�y-l-,5 Atr /Z 7-0 oq 7— doe. ylve-!-M�Z A� CAJ -?(21) 1d*oz1,eo 13e- ,,rO (�e a, Y6 rol, W,#IIV917 r;— r 5-1,6 6 W / 7e e 'o,r oj -e g—,,l C & -�O- rt/ �V eU7 14 15 4.0 Ig q-7--g,_7 AT ;?14-7-e) 11,lW.A doe 6.,V of-ileo- M Afrz�-/4- _pqw CITY OF EDMONDS ... ASSET INFORMATION SHEET [ZNEW FIADDITION n RETIREMENT ASSETNO. 00 ADDITION TO ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION SERIAL NO. LOCATION D E PT, oplo" 14)V d 6AO52.100 "PURCHASE ORDER NO. - PURCHASE ORDER DATE COST B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. ESTIMATEDLIFE *PROJECTNUMBER PROJECT COMPLETION DATE COST INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED 13Y "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST . *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY E4"DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY REFERENCE. DATE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. INITIAL ktnp DEPARTMENT FILE 100% I N C Fit T ly" D F iE 0 511,14 0 N 0 S HARVE H. HARRISON MAYOR 200 DAYTON ST. - EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. & Mrs. Terry Jensen 221-3rd Ave. No. Edmonds, WA 98020 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Dear Resident: June 15, 1982 i", n Lot 4, Blk. 8 Plat of Edmonds (4344) Re : -ICITIT";f Edmonds, WA 98020 On February 17, 1981, the Edmonds City Council passed Resolution 488 for construction, reconstruction, and repair of deteriorated sidewalks. A letter dated March 16, 1981 was sent to residents that were required to repair the sidewalk abutting their property. The improvement of sidewalks in need of repair at the expense of the abutting property owner is provided by City Ordinance, Chapter 7.20 and Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 351.68. The areas needing repair have been marked in paint on the sidewalk adjoining your property. Reconstruction permits must be obtained from the Building Department at 501 Bell Street within 30 days upon receipt of this certified letter. The fee for the sidewalk repair has been waived by the City of Edmonds. In the event these improvements are not completed within ninety (90) days upon receipt of this certified letter, the City will employ a private contractor to perform the designated repairs and the City will bill the abutting property owner. This action is in response to many citizen requests and pedestrian falling accidents which have been increasing in recent years as a result of sidewalk deterioration and increased pedestrian traffic. If you have any questions, please call Bobby Mills at 771-3202, ext. 289. Sincerely, JOHN B. MI�CHELL Superinten ent of Public Works BM/ml ATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT CITY OF EDMONDS ZONE N1UMBER,"/-&a/ej CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB ADDRESS jUITE/APT# rr., OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS PLAT NAM E/8UBDIVI SION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. LID FEE $ I&W!�AkT MAILING ADDReSS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved 0 RW Permit Required 0 z 3r 22/ ?r-A cT- 0 EXISTING PROPOSED Street Use Permit Req'd D inspection Required 0 Sidewalk Required 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE 990201 REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Underground Wiring required 0 NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED YES 0 NO E3 3 UJI ADDRESS REMARKS z OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROLJDRAINAGE Cj Ix CITY ZIP TELEPHONE ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE 7D�4R;ESS IfT ST- s-, S-1. rl 1,- z j,_� 'REVIEWED FIRE BY DATE LU CITY ZIP - TELEPHONE z LZ 0 0 mw caetk <�&14 42,5r- stric.-<367— - U. VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION REO'D BOND POSTED STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRATI AT� WGI CHECKEDBY 4L IV A) 1 0 YES 0 NO SEPA REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT SIGN AREA D P ALLOWE ROPOSED HEIGHT OWED PRO ALL POSED 0 -j PROPfRTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. I I EXP (3 NEW 0 RESIDENTIAL 0 PLUMBING / MECH LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED PROPOSED REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT) FRONT SIDE REAR PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) FRONT LJRSIDE REAR ADDITION COMMERCIAL ci COMPLIANCE OR z CHANGE OF USE z PARKING LOT AREA PLA7NYRE IP44 REMODEL �4APARTMENT 0 SIGN REQ'D I PROVIDED e �IEO /ATE Z C] GRADING FENCE ZIEPAIR CYDS 0 X FT) REMARKS REMARKS 16 �41 M C_: C"o L/-) 0 DEMOLISH 0 TANK OTHER ci GARAGE ETAINING WALL 0 RENEWAL CA 0 OC Y RPORT R KER rREOUIRED z (TYPE OF USE, BUSI SS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: i.- CHECKEDBY TYPE OF CONSTRU JIQN [CODE OCCUPANT GROUP 0 uj NUMBER NUMBER OF CRITICAL 22 SPECIAL INSPECTOR OCCUPANT OF DWELLING AREAS o UNITS NUMBER OU, I [:] YES JAREA LOAD -STORIES DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108iFINAL INSPECTION REO'D R(fPLA(Cf- * GC1 U&� (A,1`V1 Z) t- A 0 &�-e Ttk CcWA)C- �L akr CC-W-40 - - 25 r j W/47 2 - SID OPIJ!� A Ai Q I�U:;&72,44 A -v 0 - . , / i j CV7jVuJ.A (L , &)ttt 13C- &RA112-6--P CwU &'o VALUATION FEE Aer PLAN CHECK FEE HEA TSOURCE GLAZING % LOT SLOPE % BUILDING VESTED DATE PLAN CHE2r/- PLUMBING MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY T�E WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC GRADING/FILL DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE :3 SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS SURCHARGE PERMIT LIMIT. I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK Is STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS ENG. REVIEW FEES SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION "APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE Uj IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF j LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND M INSPECTION FEE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY - FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE RECEIPT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT _j DEEMEDTO MODIFY, WAIVEOR REDUCEANY REQUI REM ENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LIMIT INANYWAYTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." X1 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE REM/ 5 C I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not CALL a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO r-cel I. ckn.wl.' FOR INSPECTION receiv is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMPENSJTION..I��WRANCE AND RCW 18.27. D ATE SIGNED O.FFICII T (425) D 771-0220 RE SED By DATI! ATTENTION EXT 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL 771-0221 2k-j A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- f CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE FAX PINK - OWNER YELLOW - INSPECTOR GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 Z NDATE RECEIVED PERMIT EXPIRES USE PERMIT ZONE CITY OF EDMONDS is NUMBER 7CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION JOB SUITE/APT# ADDRESS,,/� 1r) OWNER NAME/NAME OF BUSINESS I �)(xj_; PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. 1i ft_ fZ1 ��Iy WW MAILING ADDRESS I LID FEE $ z PUBLIC: RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Appro�ed 0 3: RW Permit Required C3 0 Street Use Permit Req'd 0 CITY TELEPHONE EXISTING — PROPOSED Inspection Required 0 ZIP Sidewalk Required 0 (01 ** - - z I )` /9 — REQUIRED DEDICATION— FT Underground C1 wiring required OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED NAME METER SIZE LINE SIZE YES 0 NO Lu ADDRESS REMARKS z z WNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE 0 cr I C) z < LU CITY zip TELEPHONE NAME-, ENGINEERING REVIEWED/DATE J 1( 41 ai �x X ADDRES§'- 0 FIRE �REVIEW,ED BY DATE z CITW') ZIP TEffl�,ONE 64� (10 0/ 0 .�t - I LL i . . ., VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPEi ON L) V) v, �,"" _/ I . I' .) EXPIRATION DATE C�KED BY D STATE LICENSE NUMBER " 1 .11 . . R E Q �D 1PBONED 7 0 YES 0 NO COM�EPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT -JI PROPERTY TAXPACCOUNT PARCEL NO. LETE EXEMPT ALLOWED , PROPOSED ALLOWED , PROPOSED 0(-,) o 0 o t3o 0 41?1� Exp — RESIDENTIAL LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) ED SETBACKS (FT.) NEW PLUMBING MECH ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR UP SIDE REAR ADDITION C] COMMERCIAL COMPLIANCE OR z CHANGE OF,USE-_" z L PA*RKING OT AREA PI ANNING REVIEWED BY DATE REMODEL APARTMENT REO'D SIGN ,BROVIDED 'FENCE GRADING REPAIR C C �DS 1:1 X FT) REMARKS DEMOLISH 11 TANK 0 OTHbj Ei GARAGE Q...RE . TAINING WALL 0 RENEWAL z CARPORT OCKERY SINESS OR ACTIVITY) EXPLAIN: (TYPE OF USE, PIJ CHECKEDBY ITYPE _PDUSTR rTION ICODE OCCUPANT ? GROUP CRITICAL NUMBEROF H12J"7 n NUMBER I, , I OF DWELLING AREAS SPECIAL INSPECTOR JAREA OCCUPANT REQUIRED C] YES o STORIES UNITS NUMBER LOAD DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 108/FINAL INSPECTION RECI'D 0 A'.r -11�e_ lwi -F?., re-, -i i�j( /T '41 L,�- VALUATION FEE PLAN CHECK FEE HEAT SOU RCE GLAZING % LOT SL % BUILDING 3 Z'3 PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE PLUMBING 0 MECHANICAL THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE GRADING/FILL SEPARATE PERMISSION. STATE SURCHARGE W PERMIT APPLICATION: 180 DAYS QL PERMIT LIMIT., 1 YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS -ENGr�REViEW-FEeS:'_:1_ SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS ENG. INSPECTION FEE IN INTEREST. AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF LANDSCAPING 2 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND cc INSPECTION FEE ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLYOR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE REC IPT PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENTOF ANY CITY ORDINANCE 0 NOR LI MIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION." RECEIPT ? 1�' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THA T I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECT., AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF APPLICATION APPROVAL THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- This application is not a permit until signed by the TION, AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY. NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED CALL Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid. and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF'THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S CQyegNSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27. OF�I'CIALS SIGNATURE DA7,5),/ SIGNAIVElt(OV�t.4ER-O_l 1AIGENT) DATE SIGNED e' . '. (425) It,,; _? ;I On `kj� 6 (Al 771-0220 RIELEASED BY DATE ATTENTION EXTf 333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING'OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI_ 771-0221 CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 ORIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - IN;PECTOR FAX PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 5/98 -T I CITY OF EDIVIONOB OvC aprEp . EDW004C)s. W^SMINGTON 0020 - =6) U.12 BUILDING DEPARTMENT I BUILDING PROJECT REVIEW bo n e-V�K 'APPLICANTIOWNER NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER TYPE OF APPLICATInN ,201 30 At A) 1119 �NTAKE '-3 �a ADDRESS SIGN. PERMIT NUMBER DATE APPROVTD— DATE ISSUEff TIEMP OCCUPANCY FINAL OCCIIFIV�l REQUIRED MATERIAL FOR REVIEW (to be dated and initialed) BLDG PLANS DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLANS LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLOT PLANS LANDSCAPING PLAN DRAINAGE PLAN LID NUMBER OTHER (ADDITIONAL C"ENTS ON BACK) BONDING INFORMATION (to be dated and initialed) APPLICANT NOTIFICATION 3b lol BOND ESTIMATES BOND APPROVALS T- LANDSCAPING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DRAINAGE OTHER PERFORMANCE MAINTENANCE POSTED RELEASED RELEASED POSTED REM= (ADDITIONAL C EKTS ON BACK) DATE DATE ADD-L REQ-0 DATE DATE DATE DATE CD SENT RETN INFORIIATION PEOT RECV RESB RETN OTHER z BUILDING PLAII CHECK Ej STRUCTURAL PLAN CHECK .j ENGINEERING CALC'S DATE REQUESTED DATE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL REQUESTS/DATES (ADDITIONAL CO.MMENTS ON BACK) 0 PLANNING ENGINEERING 'PUBLIC WORKS FIRE OTHER z 'SENT 3usp SENT SUSF--- SENT SuSF-- SENT 0 m RT14D RT95— RTND RTND RT140 0 z R w w z F9 z w CD z z z CL PROJECT NAME DATE RECn-VTD— RETURN DATE DRAINAGE SITE IMPROVEMENTS UTILITIES PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS LOT -TRTTK- ADDIT1oNX[L-Tffr6-kEQ—T RECV FINAL VERIFICATION (ADDITIONAL C"ENTS ON BACK) Z-k 7 /DAY RELLIVED RETI P;(UJLLT NAME S-P # A 0 Cu f HRG DATES V 0 R 0 Sm 0 PREVIOUS ADB 0 OTHER --77Pr— FUTURE ZONING SETBACKS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST % LOT COVEqAGE OTHER INFORMATION VARIANCE STATUS AD8 STATUS PRELIMINARY FINAL (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK) SIGNAGE /01 / -'� , e ALLOW D USED m I a is Lu z 6 z w Arl" � pit CITY OF EDMONDS CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 96020 SINGLE FAMILY I'lULTIPLE 4E�� PROJECT NAME ADDRESS A ENGINEERING & P R 0 J E C T PUBLIC, WORKS R E V I E W CHECK LIST CONTACT NAME 6 TELEPHONE NUMBER ACCESS SLOPE AND VEHICLE ACCESS yom DRAINAGE PLAN V v STREET FILE LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFICATION QUIT CLAIM/DEDICATIONS EASEMENT - PUBLIC/PRIVATE ps CALCULATE SEWER CONNECTION IF NO LID # STREET PAVING REQUIRED CURB AND GUTTER REQUIRED SIDEWALK REQUIRED CURB CUT FOR DRIVEWAY,REQUIRED RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT REQUIRED BOND REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS STREET NAME SIGN REQUIRED OTHER SIGNING REQUIRED (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK) EXISTING WATER MAIN SIZE WATER MAIN REQUIRED SERVICE LINE REQUIRED la HYDRAHT SIZE EXISTING Ic HYDRANT REQUIRED PER FIRE CODE SIZE CROSS CONNECTION INSPECTION WATER HFTER CHARGE REQUIRED REVIEW BY DATE (ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON BACK) cc SANITARY SEWER DRAWING NUMBER FILE NU14BER ul SIDE SEWER AVAILABILITY SANITARY SEWER CON14ECTION FEE REQUIRED ui OPEN DITCH EXISTING REQUIRED IM CULVERT REQUIRED- -SIZE CATCH BASIN REQUIRED INDICATED ON SITE PLAN - W63 'p IE 4 7.6 x 00 (D. U 'j-1 GO-6-k- K4 " 'act - job no. rf no. f.f. -no. SHEET NO. OF 2 SHT S-. .... . .... - (D. U )V,L I ,&-P p C66 5 2. C), I E 4-7.6 j6b no. r.f. no. no. SHEET NO. -4� 7, 17 1V1;-,-Ae Y' Z_ //v4E: At's 04Z >000000 ........... % F ............................ ........... C3tj it e2 14=1/ 7 rr P, 0 0.14 Lo r 7��ppv tj 0 10 0 ly ;iv _,c A V4��IVe.' zE� IVOR 7 /V "N OTE 'FEATURES- ON TH IS DRAWIN PLOTTED IN APPROXIMATELY IN THE CORRECT _lVvlzlA__ �771=>� 'ON -ANY*-PLACE,WHERE:.A 0,19ENS I ON �MAY BECOME. -CRITICAL.o THE DIMENSION w 'Ai ,'LOCATi BE,iVERJF,'IM OW O'UND Rl OR M ST -THE GR -0 F NAL DESIGN. 71-7 Pi, 4�-:, ..q 7" 77 l"Q-A/4e:> d eva ;r —Val lool effz L P'A 45 IN, -,AS 0 op,40 /IJO 110 .55 s — — — — — — — — — — 0 0 .10 U 7- /6 IR z 10 57 `NJ '0, 2 W X N`Z cg�� to 0 0 P2 0, �j L-- — — — — — — — — --- 0 e)00 1 0 J� 10 lip E3 19 011 , tu, 114 4 DATE: