201 5TH AVE S (3).PDFIIIIIIIIIIII
5172
201 5TH AVE S
AD 1- �ecl C54*94vr� (9
TAX ACCOUNTIPARCEL
BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE):
COVENANTS (RECORDED)
1\ Z/
CRITICAL AREAS: hk- v, DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver R Study Required 0 Waiver
DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S:
DRAINAGE PLAN DATED:
PARKING AGREEMENTS DATEI
EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR:
-* PERMITS (OTHER
PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED:
SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: Alz-,:;�)
SEWER LID FEE $: LID #:
SHORT PLAT FILE: LOTI/6 4 S114D BLOCK:
SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:
SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #:
GEOTECH REPORT DATED:
STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #:WO-0-7
FOR:
WATER METER TAP CARD DATED:
z
-49,
L\TEMP\DS'Ps\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc
0�- L I.) /-V 0
Un
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 FAX: (425) 771-022 1
STATUS: ISSUED ENG20120178
I Street Use Permit
Permit Number: ENG20120178
Address of Public Use/Encroachment: 201 5TH AVE S, EDMONDS
PO BOX 5003
BELLEVUE, WA 98009
LAS BRISAS MEXICAN RESTAURANT
10604 154TH I'L NE
REDMOND, WA 98052
(425) 6�,7.2-5050
STREET IJSE/ENCROACI-IN'IEN'I'
BISTRO DINING TABLES TOGETHER WITH PORTABLE 48" STANCHIONS AND ROPE WITHIN ROW ON SIDEWALK
STREET USE: Placement qf any temporary or movable objects in any portion ofpublic space or Citv right-of-way shall
meet all code requirements as setforth in thefollowing chapters ql'the Edmonds Community Development Code.
ENCROACHMENT. Permanent structures encroaching upon any portion ofpublic space, City right-of-way or
easement area shall meet all Code Requirements as selforth in thefollowing chapter of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
CODEAPPLICA TION. Chapter 18.70, 17.65, and 17.70.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. All terms
of the adopted ordinance are incorporated herein as �f setforth in./ull and this permit therefore is subject to the terms of
those chapters.
FOR THE TERM IN WHICH THIS PUBLIC USEIENCROACHMENT IS IN EFFECT, THE OWNER SHALL COMPL Y WITH
THE PERMIT CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY THIS PERMIT.
NOTE: The issuance of this permit is understood by the owner to be of a temporal- ' v nature, shall vest no permanent right
and shall be issued and may in any case be revoked at the sole discretion qf'the City per ECDC 18.70.040. Applicant is
responsible to provide a copy of the insurance certificate to the City at the beginning of each calendar year, no later
than the 21st day of January.
INDEMNITY. The Applicant understands and agrees to hold the City of'Edinonds harmlessfi-om any injuries, damages
or claims qf an ' v kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the
City of Edmonds, or an ' y of its departments or employees, including but not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court cost, and attorneyfees by reason ofgranting this permit. In addition, the
applicant understands that helshe shall provide and conthivall ' v maintain during the term of the permit a ceritificate of
insurance naming the city as an additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to
any other policy of insurance.
THIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR HIS/HER DEPUTY: AND FEES ARE PAID, AND RECEIPT IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN
SPACE PROVIDED
=="A Printed: Friday, July 13, 20121
7 3,17
I RELEPySED BY DATE
XFILE COPY n INSPECTOR COPY n APPLICANT COPY
STATUS: ISSUED
ENG20120178
When bisto dining is proposed on a seasonal basis the following steps shall be taken to keep the street
use permit valid:
1) One month before opening bisto dining for the season submit written notice to the City notifying of
the desired opening date along with payment of the monthly fee ($87.59).
0 2) One month prior to closing the bistro dining for the season submit written notice to the City.
MONTHLY FEES ARE DUE PAYABLE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO IST OF EACH MONTH FOR
USE OF THE CITY SIDEWALK FOR BISTRO DINING. IN ADDITION, ANNUAL FEES ARE DUE
PAYABLE TO THE CITY BY JANUARY 15TH OF EACH YEAR.
• The proposal will not adversely impact public space open to vehicular or pedestrian travel.
• Architectural Design Board Approval has been granted or the process has been administratively
approved.
• The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public.
• Items shall be placed adjacent to the building and may encroach onto a maximum of two feet of the
public sidewalk; or in accordance with Bistro and outdoor dining code; or per an approved building
permit.
• Safe Pedestrian travel area, or clear zone, of 44 inches minimum width, providing a level safe walking
surface along the public sidewalk, shall be maintained. (e.g. measuring 44 inches from edge of street tree
grates or newspaper stands toward place of business.)
• Exterior light Fixtures, banners, signs and flags must provide for a minimum clear zone of 7 feet above
City right-of-way.
• Clear Landings of 44 inches or no less than the width of the door (whichever is greater), measured
toward the street, shall be maintained on the exterior side of all required exit doors.
• Illumination from the city light fixtures shall not be blocked.
• No objects shall be hung from the City light standards.
• Three feet of clearance around fire hydrants, standpipes, P.I.V.'s, manholes, water meters, blowoffs,
cleanouts and valves shall be maintained.
• Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per
City standards that is caused by or occurs during the permitted project.
• Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt
from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and
I 0:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the
noise originating from construction sites/activities must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30,
unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120.
• Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify
defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from
any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance fo this
permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any
City ordinance not limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision.
0 X-Site Inspection
',Dc� 1 %913
#.P20
City. olEdmonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.0221
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on'the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, 'or soil
surveys)..
Date Received:-7/ 14 lot -
City Receipt#: poo 91,15
Critical Areas File#: G"--V&—CAJ
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.00
Date Mailed to Applicant: eq—Z-.-Z006
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist,.make a
precursory site visit� and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application. -
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form.. In
addition, the applicant. shall include other pertinent
information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their preliminary assessment of the site.
I'hq.tindersignedapplicant and his/herlits; heirs, and assigns, 'in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
.,,to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City,of Edmonds harmless. from any and all damages, including reasonable
- �ttomey's fees arising from any a . cti on ! or I infraction' based in w�ole �or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information finnished by the applicant, his/hei/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I cer* that the information and
knowledge and that I am author"i e s ic
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTI,
with submitted are true and correct to the best of my
ehalf of the owner as listed below.
DATE
.01
Property Owner's Authorbaflon V I
By my signature, I cer* that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OW&ER DATE
Owner/AppHcant:
Name
N. . T�J
Street Address
city State Zip
Telephone: 6 -75
Email address (optional):
Applicant Representative-
Nam� Nut t-�
Street Address
city State Zip
Telephone: -�5,9Y
Email Address (optional): O�AV4 i f4AA -
#P20
Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: OU "T7
Site Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/vegetation)
1.. Site Address/ Location: " kvttl 6 .
2.
3.
4.
5.
.1
7�
-8.
4,tr 9.
Property Tax Account Number:
Approxhinate Site Size (acres or squ t)
�ar �e e e
Is this site currently developed? yes; — no.
If yes; how is. site developed? 4VITZ17. OW, MIM
Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat. less than 5-feet elevation change ove . r entire site.
Rolling: slopes on. site generally -less than 15% (a vertical rise of . 10-fe*et over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly:. slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over. a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a. vertical rise of 10-fe�t over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
-Other (please describe): tbuaiti RqtzA e.Lot, pq- f1LtAjM1RL
Site contains areas of year-round standing water: lAd", Approx. Depth -
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water- Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the yearl
Site is in the flQodway floodPlaifi of 'a Wa(t�i course.
Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs. mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) Rd t IT
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: — 61 e-
--- - ----------- For City Staff Use Only
1. Plan Check Numbe . r, if applicable? N OnO N VfM,
2. Site is Zoned?. 5 C, C0MMjAjj if!4 8LA61'n SS
3. SCS mapped soil iypew? 16 (a1&4(Wo0Cj --lArloavt taod comp lex 2-8-1. ce'lopes) 1C) (evefe+t-.
1 1601M 0-61. Voris).
4. Critical Areas inventorypi C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? UVAP- M4p JY\CkfCMC�2
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
DETERMINATION
X -STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewedby-, i VIOL, C0W 0.,, Date. 0 e 0 1 PC)() (0
4
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location:
201 5 1h Avenue South
Tax Acct. Number:
00434212100100
Determination:
Study Required
Determination #:
CRA-2006-0097
Applicant:
Ralph W. Allen
Owner:
GPA Inc.
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CRA-2006-0097)
During review and inspection of the subject site (the northern parcel - one of two parcels that
makes up "Old Milltown" — see map on page two of this report), it was found that the site may
contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including an Erosion Hazard Area, pursuant to Chapter
23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The LIDAR map indicates
erosion potential, as the site slopes down from east to west at slopes of approximately 23% and
25% (see attached map).
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject
property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any
potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development
proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a
mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and
delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to
complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific
development application.
Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are
listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of
critical areas (see below).
Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in
the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved
list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for
more information.
General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110
through 23.40.140.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area.
• Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or
greater. among others.
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A.
In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific
Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the
Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the
director's discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in
compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required.
0 0 *41 1.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area.
Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer or other qualified professional.
0 Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070.
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If
you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed
activity, please contact a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC
23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner
for more information.
Gina Coccia, Planner VVVV August 1, 2006
Name, Title Signature Date
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on
the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
�703Z300404100. 004036DO
?�70223
2i=30046TOO
L-004342;F200050D
16400001500,
: ,
1
,. , , - ., - . . 0043471200flOO - OUi42
- 004342f2000392; -0043471200700 , 00434272001200
270.72M4038W
004342120003010043421?DODWOi 'DO4342120MO
03
27 23064'6900 J
342 QW0 . Wt
2i&323OiMO4300
27032306464400
t
0434212003800
23004�900.�
770323004040DO
00434212003200 0043421?DO'800 M
0043!4212�W3300' :� 00434212003000 ON34212002t
2TO32300404500
6043142120d3�00 [�W31212003100
J
�270323GD406901?
9:
0080590OW0100. 0094470002024
.270323004ON00
00905900000201 �008447000102
M0770=01100i
*466500,
0 '007200010 00
k004342121001004 010
342f2l 007.00. :0"'07200030100"
27032300407100
1
00434 2'121DO100. '010072000202DDi
.0100720DOIP290'
00805900000301.'1. 0844MO010fi
2 703231 017
—'008447000201
23 'MiDO -
0.04.
i . "
2F032j00407200'-
00434?12 1 03000'
00642900000100
0 64200bNO300
0
00642 00M500
27C�3 9
2300401 60
0064? MM700 �008520"52900
fZ103700
23 0660�
.004342
'M42900"900GN34,172103100..
A"- '�0434
006422DMOBOD 0085?DOW53100
"006,0290OM400
006429000M204)
00d42900001000.
2703 23004074DO
27032300408000
�7`76�2300467600. !. . .
------
10101850001 i�- - �
ZZAZIpper Zeman Assoclatesi, Inc.
Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting
A Ireffacan Company
Grace Architects, PLLC
1927 Post Alley
Seattle, Washington 98101
Attention: Mr. Ralph Allen
soup
BEET FILE
Subject: Geotechnical Pre -Construction Evaluation
Task 1: Western Building Subgrade
Old Milltown Building Renovations
Dayton Street & 5 1h Avenue S.
Edmonds, Washington
RESUB
JUL o 2 2007
81065097
May 15, 2007
Dear Ralph:
Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA) is pleased to submit this report describing the results of
our geotechnical pre -construction evaluation for the western building at the above- referenced
project site. We previously completed a preliminary geotechnical evaluation of both the western
and eastern buildings at the project site, as described in the following document.
Memo: East Retaining Wall and New Footings, Old Milltown Building Renovation,
Dayton Street & 5th Avenue S., Edmonds, Washington (dated July 12, 2006).
Our complete scope of geotechnical services was outlined in our proposal letter dated June 14,
2006, and was formally authorized by you on June 26, 2006. This report is an instrument of
service that conforms to locally accepted geotechnical engineering practice, and it has been
prepared for the exc ' lusive use of Grace Architects (formerly called Bridge Architects), in specific
association with the stated project and purpose.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site comprises a historical commercial property called Old Milltown, which is located
in the downtown area of Edmonds, Washington, as shown on the attached Site Location Map
(Figure 1). This property currently includes three contiguous buildings (western, eastern, and
southern) and an adjacent parking lot. It has a roughly square shape that measures about 150
feet by 170 feet overall and is abutted by Dayton Street on the north, by Maple Street on the
south, by 5th Avenue S. on the west, and by residential properties on the east. Our attached
Site Vicinity Map (Figure 2) depicts this subject site in relation to various adjacent features.
The western and eastern subject buildings are slated for a complete renovation. Most of the
original interior walls, floors, ceilings, and roofs will be reconstructed with new concrete or wood
elements, but the exterior walls will be largely preserved. At the western building, an array of
new structural columns will be insta lied at 16-foot spacings throughout the interior and along the
14405 SE 361h Sted #210, Beflevue, WA 98006 (425) 746-1889 I= (4251746-1296
0
A IS
Old Milltown Building Renovations
81065097
May IS, 2007
Page 2
exterior walls to support the new floors and roof structure. Our attached Building & Exploration
Plan (Figure 3) illustrates the proposed layout of new structural columns within the western
building. Based on the assumptions and preliminary recommendations presented in our
previous geotechnical memo, all such columns and walls have been designed to bear on spread
footings imposing a maximum allowable static soil pressure of 3000 psf.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of our geotechnical pre -construction evaluation was to characterize near -surface
conditions within the western building, such that we could confirm or confute our preliminary
geotechnical design assumptions regarding soil bearing pressures for proposed new footings.
We performed our services in general accordance with our aforementioned proposal, except
where modifications were warranted by project schedules, access constraints, or client
requests. It should be noted that our authorized scope of services did not include a quantitative
or qualitative assessment as to the potential presence of regulated environmental contaminants
at the project site. We ultimately completed the following scope items:
• A review of available topographic and geologic maps pertaining to the site;
• A review of limited subsurface data presented by Thorne Environmental, Inc. (TEI) in an
excerpt of their environmental report dated July 6, 1989;
• A review of limited subsurface data presented by Farallon Consulting, Inc. (FCI) in an
excerpt of their environmental report dated May 11, 2006;
• A visual surface reconnaissance of the site;
• Ten exploratory test pits (designated TP-1 through TP-10) advanced at strategic
locations across the western building subgrade;
• Geotechnical engineering analyses regarding the existing soil conditions with respect to
the proposed footings;
• Preparation of this written report.
The locations, elevations, and depths associated with our recent on -site explorations are
summarized in Table 1 and are illustrated on Figure 3. For completeness, the previous
explorations performed and/or reported by TEI and FCI are included on Figure 2. Appendix A
describes our field exploration procedures. Appendices B and C contain excerpts from the
environmental reports by TEI and FCI, respectively.
Geotcchniml Pre -Construction Fv1,11WA6011
0
0
0
A is
"W
Old Milltown Building Renovations
81065097
MaylS,2007
Page 3
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF SITE EXPLORATION DATA BY ZZ4
Surface
Termination
Exploration
Functional
Location
Elevation
Depth
(feet)
(feet)
TP-1
Western building, northeast part
Floor subgrade
6
TP-2
Western building, northeast part
Floor subgrade
6
TP-3
Western building, southeast part
Floor subgrade
61/2
TP-4
Western building, southeast part
Floor subgrade
6
TP-5
Western building, southeast part
Floor subgrade
5
TP-6
Western building, southeast part
Floor subgrade
6
TP-7
Western building, southwest part
Floor subgrade
61/2
TP-8
Western building, northwest part
Floor subgrade
6
TP-9
Western building, northwest part
Floor subgrade
6
P-1 0
Western building, southwest part
Floor subgrade
6
Note: All exploration d pths should be regarded only as approximate values.
SITE SETTING
Old Milltown is located within an urban area characterized by dense commercial and residential
development. Regional surface grades slope generally downward to the west or northwest at a
gentle to moderate angle. As such, most of the buildings in the site vicinity are arranged on the
sloping terrain in a stair -step fashion. We infer that a moderate amount of cutting and filling has
been performed during the past century as part of the existing neighborhood developments.
According to the 1983 Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West
Quadrangles, Washington (Map MF-1 541) published by the U.S. Geological Survey, subsurface
soil conditions in the site vicinity are dominated by Quaternary -age glacial deposits.
Specifically, the map indicates that the site straddles a contact between the Whidbey Formation
and a sequence of younger Transitional Beds. The older (lower) deposit is described as
compact, oxidized, medium to coarse sands with some peat or organic sands near the top. The
ypunger (upper) deposit is described as layered gray clay, silt, and fine sand with some organic
sand and gravel near the bottom.
SITE CONDITIONS
The Old Milltown structure is a composite of old wood -frame and masonry buildings ranging
from one to three stories high. Because adjacent grades are higher to the east and south,
basement retaining walls run along the eastern and southern sides of the structure. These
retaining walls range up to about 20 feet high, and they currently gain lateral support from floor
slabs and floor/ceiling framing. At the time of our recent site reconnaissance, demolition work
was underway in the western building; most of the interior walls and interior floor slabs had
been removed.
Gcotechnical Pre-Constructimi Evaluation
0 0
ZZA Old Milltown Building Renovations
9174 14mm 81065097
May IS, 2007
Page 4
According to 'reports by TEI and FCI, subsurface site conditions were previously, explored in
1989 and 2006 using methods that included backhoes, hand augers, power augers, and
geoprobes. These explorations generally revealed sandy soils with varying amounts of silt and
gravel. Groundwater was observed approximately 5 to 6 feet below grade in the western
building. Unfortunately, no SPT sampling or other form of soil -density assessment was
performed in conjunction with the exploratory -programs reported by TEI and FCI.
Our own recent (April 2007) test pits performed within the western building disclosed subsurface
conditions that generally conform to the published mapping designations but vary somewhat
across the study area. Specifically, all ten test pits encountered an upper layer of fairly loose,
silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. Several test pits revealed lenses of black silt or small
debris within this upper layer, which appeared to comprise some combination of fill soils and
disturbed native soils. At depths ranging from about 1 to 41/2 feet below base -of -slab level, our
te . st pits encountered medium dense, fine sand with varying amounts of silt, gravel, and cobbles,
as well as prevalent orange mottling. We infer this lower deposit to be native soil associated
with the Whidbey Formation. Although none of our test pits encountered groundwater seepage,
the mottling suggests that high groundwater levels have occurred in the past.
Figure 2 shows the approximate field locations of previous on -site explorations reported by TEI
and FCI. Figure 3 shows the field locations of our recent test pits, all of which were performed
within the western building. For convenience, Figure 3 also indicates the depth of the medium
dense sand horizon relative to base -of -slab leve . 1. Appendix A presents our stratigraphic test pit
logs, while Appendices B and C contain text and/or logs by TEI and FCI.
GEOTECHNICAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the information obtained from our research findings and subsurface explorations, the
proposed use of spread footings to support new structural columns and walls within the western
building appears feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, contingent on proper subgrade.
preparation and footing design. The following paragraphs present our specific geotechnical
comments and recommendations concerning new spread footings.
Bearina Provisions: The surficial loose sands and black silts underlying the western building are
poorly suited for supporting spread footings, due to their somewhat non -uniform density and
moderate compressibility. In order to provide adequate bearing conditions for new columns and
walls, we recommend that all footings gain support from the underlying medium dense sand
deposit, which we observed at depths'on the order of 1 to 41/2 feet below base -of -slab level.
Figure 3 indicates the approximate depth of this bearing horizon at each test pit location. Where
this bearing horizon depth exceeds the normal footing depth, adequate support can be
accomplished by either of the following options:
A. Extending all footings downward to bear directly on the medium dense sand deposit.
B. Overexcavating and replacing.the overlying loose sands and silts with bearing pads of
suitable structural fill.
Geotechnic-al Pre-ConstraLlion 1",valtiation
7J
0
Atf Al
Old Milltown Building Renovations
81065097
May 15, 2007
Page 5
Subc
irade Prer)aration: After the foundation excavations have reached the appropriate depth
necessary to accommodate the footings and bearing pads, as discussed above, all exposed
subgrades should be compacted to a reasonably firm and unyielding condition by means of a
pneumatic impact compactor ("jumping jack"). Any localized zones of soft silt encountered
within the footing subgrade areas should be removed before compactive effort is applied.
Bearing Pad Materials: if Option B is selected for new footings, we recommend that all bearing
pads be composed of a fairly high -strength structural fill material. Conventional angular gravel,
such as "Crushed Surfacing Base Course" per WSDOT: 9-03.9(3) or 2-inch-minus "railroad
ballast," would be suitable for this purpose. Alternatively, either control led-d ensity fill (CDF) or
lean -mix concrete (LMC) could be used if desired for ease of placement and higher shear
strength.
Bearina Pad Dimensions: Because foundation stresses are transferred outward as well as
downward into the bearing soils, all gravel bearing pads should extend horizontally outward
from the edge of each footing a distance equal to one-half of the bearing pad thickness.
Therefore, a 2-foot-thick gravel bearing pad should extend outward at least 1 foot from each
side of a footing. In contrast, bearing pads composed of CDF or LMC would not need to be
oversized in this fashion.
Bearing Capacities: Based on the dimensional criteria, subgrade conditions, and bearing pad
materials described above, we recommend that all footings be designed for the following
maximum allowable soil bearing capacities. These values incorporate static and transient (wind
or seismic) safety factors of at least 2.0 and 1.5, respectively.
Design Parameter Allowable Value
Static Bearing Capacity 3000 psf
Transient Bearing Capacity 4000 psf
Footing Settlements: We estimate that total post -construction settlements of properly designed
footings bearing on properly prepared subgrades will not exceed 1 inch. Differential settlements
between new foundation elements over horizontal spans of 50 feet could approach 1/2.inch,
while differential settlements between new and existing foundation elements could approach 3/4
inch. In all cases, these settlements would be reduced if the actual design bearing pressures
are lower than our recommended maximum allowable pressures.
Footing and Sternwall Backfill: To provide erosion protection and lateral load resistance, we
recommend that all footing excavations be backfilled on all sides of the footings and stemwalls
after the concrete has cured. Either imported structural fill or non -organic on -site soils can be
used for this purpose, contingent on a suitable moisture content at the time of placement.
Regardless of soil type, all footing backfill soil should be compacted to a density of at least 90
percent (based on ASTM: D-1557). As an easier -to -place alternative, CDF or LMC could be
used instead.
6cotechnical Pre-Consiruclion Evaluation
E
Old Milltown Building Renovations
ZZ 81065097
BPI
May 15, 2007
Page 6
Lateral Resistance: Footings and stemwalls that have been properly backfilled as described
above will resist lateral movements by means of passive earth pressure and base friction. We
recommend using the following design values, which incorporate static and transient (wind or
seismic) safety factors of at least 1.5 and 1.1, respectively. Base friction can be combined with
the respective passive pressure to resist static and transient loads.
Design Parameter
Static Passive Pressure
Transient Passive Pressure
Base Friction Coefficient
Allowable Value
300 pcf
400 pcf
0.4
Subgrade Verification: All footing subgrades should consist of either firm, unyielding, medium
dense to dense, undisturbed, native'soils or suitable structural fill materials placed over
reasonably firm and unyielding native soils. Footings should never be cast atop loose, soft, or
frozen soil, slough, debris, existing uncontrolled fill, or surfaces covered by standing water. We
recommend that the condition of all subgrades be verified by a ZZA representative before any
bearing pad fill is placed, and then again before any footing concrete is poured.
Geotechnical [Ire -Construction Evaluation
0 0.
0
0
Old Milltown Building Renovations
ZZA 81065097
NAA &M-11
May 15, 2007
Page 7
NO
CLOSURE
The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the
subsurface explorations accomplished for the project. It should be remembered that the
number, locations, and depths of these explorations were completed within the constraints of
budget, schedule, and site access. We wish to further emphasize that our explorations reveal
subsurface conditions only at discrete locations across the site; subsurface conditions in other
areas could vary considerably, but the nature and extent of any such variations would likely not
become evident until additional explorations are performed or construction activities have
begun. If significant variations are observed at that time, we may need to modify our
conclusions and recommendations to reflect the actual conditions.
We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service on this project and would be pleased to
discuss the contents of this report or other aspects of this project with you at your convenience.
Please call it you have any questions or need additional information.
Respectfully Submitted,
ZIPPER ZEMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
James % Brisbine, P.E.
Senior Engineer
Enclosures: Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 - site & Exploration Plan
Figure 3 — Building & Exploration Plan
Appendix A — Field Exploration Procedures, General Notes, and Logs
Appendix B — Excerpt from 1989 Report by Thorne Environmental, Inc.
Appendix C — Excerpt from 2006 Report by Farallon Consulting, Inc,
Distribution: Addressee (via email)
Don Nelson / JRP Engineers (via email)
Georechmail 1're-C.oworuclion I-A1,11WIL1071
0
COUNty
"T9111
PARK
PL PARK
64 H
L
SW
IFBT11
ldnH '-P w
.)ISM
-1
.'
!i14
;Z
�.0
196TH ST SW
T
PUGET D�
PUG,1*- D'
MLODY I.,N
i9f
WWI
�W
t Y
f
AA
. tf, �AARr T, z.
.
Yjr" 2 �'T
CASP ST
11 9k .'-q
U��'E4F RWA TER
PROJECT
,T IN
PA RK
. '7
SITE
P.M LN
.
AL*:1 W, ...... z"
'J", l:1 -'! R,
-H
4FAL
A A
DALE f
"PRAUlf
i =5
AIDSE
px.
Y
�T �A'
fELL S1
4
MAIN,
ST
DAYTON.
YOSI
w
wxnk "W
PARK
UNION
m
BAR
C1 A;
OIN
VNELL . Nry
[I, V.
MARSH
"J
iriiiL
14t Wl
Eva 4
�t
i I
p"'V" fi*
2115TH SW
';T
gL 5 W
FIR
MUA CDOLA
?20TH 1. so 5W
Lt4 ST
-pk-
ct'
@2004Thomas Bros. MapsUR 097 Old Milltown Renovations
Zipper Zeinan Associates, Inc. Project No. J-81065 Edmonds, Washington
Gcotechnical tind Environmental Consulting Date: July. 2006
0 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Drawn by: J. Duncan FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP
Lynnwood. Washington 99036 Scale: NTS
Tcte. (425) 771-3304 Fax- (425) 771-3549 1
0
0
F,
61b
B-4
(FCI)
ANTIQUE FUEL
PUMP
(6
LU
V�/ z
B-1 TP-41g
(FCI) (TEI)
B-3 IS
(TEI)
I I LANDSCAPE
i
I AREA
TP-519
(TEI)
9
DAYTON STREET
OLD MILL TOWN
RETAIL BUILDING
B-5 .(SEE FIGURE 3 FOR
(FCI) DETAILED VIEW)
10,000
GALTANK
TP-2
(TEI)19 (913-2
1,000 TEI)
GALTANK
TP-3
(TEI)
UPPER
PARKING
LOT TP-1
(TEI)
TP-6
B-2 (TEI)pg
(FCI)
MAPLE STREET
LEGEND:
B-1 BORING NUMBER AND 1W TP-1 TEST PIT NUMBER AND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION APPROXIMATE LOCATION
(PREVIOUS STUDY BY OTHERS) (PREVIOUS STUDY BY OTHERS)
Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. Project No. J-81065097 Old Milltown Renovations
(;coteelwical.and Environmental Consulting Date: April, 2007 Edmonds, Washington
1 H905 33rd Avenue West. Suite 1 17 Drawn b)r. J. Duncan FIGURE 2- SITE & EXPLORATION PLAN
Lynnwood. Washington 99036 Scale, NTS
Tele. (425) 771-3304 Fax: (425) 771-3549 1
0
TP-9
S4.5
TP-8
4.5 1-7
TP-1
3.5
PROPOSED NEW
STRUCTURAL COLUMNS (TY1
0 El C
TP-10
3.0 TP
1.5
0
EN TP-2
3.0
E
Loll
N TP-3
3.0
TP.7 i 0
4.0 1 a] I TP-6
TP-5 192.0
1.0
LEGEND:
TP-1 TEST PIT NUMBER AND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION Source; Drawing scanned and traced form file provided by JRP Engineering and modified by ZZA.
3.5 DEPTH TO MEDIUM DENSE Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. Project No. 81065097 Old Milltown Renovations
I SOIL (IN FEET) Geolechnical and Fnvironmental Consulting Date: April, 2007 Edmonds, Washington
0 20 40 18905 33rd Avenue West. Suite 117 Drawn by, J.Duncan FIGURE 3: BUILDING & EXPLORATION
N�� Lynnwood, Washingto'n 98036 Scale: As Noted PLAN
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET Tele: (425) 771-3304 rax: (425) 771-3549 1
0
E
E
9
0
0
APPENDIX
FIELD EXPLORATION
PROCEDURES, GENERAL NOTES, AND LOGS
81065097
0 9
FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES
The following paragraphs describe our procedures associated with the on -site subsurface
explorations and field tests that we conducted for this project. Interpretive stratigraphic . logs of
our explorations are enclosed in this appendix.
Test Pit Procedures
Our exploratory test pits were advanced with a small, rubber -track -mounted excavator
(trackhoe) operated by Belfor, the on -site contractor: A geotechnical specialist from our firm
continuously observed the test pit excavations, logged the subsurface conditions, and obtained
representative soil samples. All samples were stored in watertight containers and later
transported to our laboratory for further visual examination and testing. After we logged each
test pit, the hoe operator backfilled it with excavated soils and tamped the surface.
The enclosed Test Pit Logs indicate the vertical sequence of soils and other materials
encountered in each test pit, based primarily on our field classifications and supported by our
subsequent laboratory examination and/or testing. Where a soil contact was observed to be
gradational or undulating, our logs indicate the average contact depth. We estimated the
relative density and consistency of the in -situ soils by means of the excavation characteristics
and the stability of the test pit sidewalls. Our logs also indicate the approximate depths of any
sidewall caving or groundwater seepage observed in the test pits, as well'as all sample
numbers and sampling locations.
81065097
0
0
S
GENERAL NOTES
)RILLING &SAMPLING SYMBOLS:
3. S:
split Spoon - 1 -�W- I.D.. 2" 0. D.. unless otherwise noted
HS:
Hollow Stem Auger
3T
Thin -Walled Tube - 2*'O.D-. unless otherwise noted
PA:
Power Auger
:ZS
Ring Sampler - 2.42" I.D., 3, 0 D., unless othemAse noted
HA:
Hand Auger
3B
Diamond Bit Coring - 41� N, 8
RB:
Rock Bit
3s.
BuIK Sample or Auger Sample
WB.
Wash Boring or Mud Rotary
rhe number of blw,,s required to advance a standard 2-InCh 0,D. split -spoon sampler (SS) the last 12 inches of the total 18-Inch
)enetration with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches is considered the "Standard Penetration"or'N-Vakte".
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS:
WL- Water Level WS: While Sampling N/E: Not Encountered
WC1 wet cave in WD: Whie Drilling
DCI: Dry Cave in BCR* Before Casing Removal
AB- After Boring ACR- After Casing Removal
Water levels indicated on me boring logs are the levels measured in the bWagS at the bmes indicated. Groundwater levels at other
limes and other locations across the site could vary. In pervious soils, the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater. in
law permeability soils, the accurate determination of groundwater levels may not be possibley,,fth only short-term.observations.
DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Soil classification is based oil the Unifled Classification Systern. Coarse Grailned Soils have
more than 50% of their dry �Aelght retained on a #206 sieve; their oncipal descriptors are: L*ulcers. cobbles. gravel or sand. Fine
Gralned Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200,sleve, they are principally described as cl%s it they are plastic,
and sills ifthey are slightly plastic or non -plastic Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added
according to the relative proportions based on grain size. in addition to gradation, coarse -grained soils are defined on the basis of their
in -place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency.
CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS
standard
unconfine-cl
Penstratl on or
Compressive
N-value (SS)
si7enath. Psf
Blows(Ft.
-Qu.
Consistency
-e 500
<2
Very Soft
500 - 1,000
2-3
soft
-1,001 - 2.000
4-6
Medium SlIff
2,001 - 4.000
7-12
Stiff
4,001 - 8,00
13-26
Very Stiff
B..000+
26+
Hard
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL
Descriptive Term . (M Of Ot Percent of
consilittuentS Dry Weiaht
Trace
With
Modifier
< 15
15-29
> 30
RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES
pesc.riptbm Term 1§1 Of Ot Percent o
constituents Dry Weight
Trace < 5
with 5- 12
Modifiers > 12
RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE -GRAINED SOILS
Standard Penetrition
or N-value (SS1
BlowsfFt.
0-3
4-9
10-29
30-49
50+
Relativiii Qe—ns-OW
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY
Maior Componen
of Sample Pamicle Size
Boulders
Over 12 in (300mm)
CobbIeS
12 in to 3 In. (300mrn to 75 mm)
Gravel
3 in. 10 #4 sieve (75mrn to 4 75 mm)
Sand
94 to #200 sieve (4.75mm 10 0-075111m)
Silt or Clay
Passing #200 Steve (0.075mm)
PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION
Term . Plasticity index
Non -plastic. 0
Low 1-10
meclium 11-30
High ?�O+
Irerracon
81065097
a]
I -
I
----I
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 1 Page I of 1
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLES
TESTS
0
_j
DESCRIPTION
0
M
>:
Cr
lop
5
0 CL
uj:E
K
>-
(D
In
Cr
Ld
in
LU
>
0
Z to
3:
Z
ir LU
LU I-
D
U_ CD
ZZ
0 Ui
IL
0-
Ui
L)
(A
2
M
LU
a-
U
'cr
�� 0
o- _j
Z
0
>-
cc t
U
Z
0
Z)
Z
En ca
0
06.
Dw
SILTY SAND WITH SOME GRAVEL
AND DEBRIS, brown, loose, damp,
I
I
I
zones of black silt (Fill)
brown, medium dense, moist
5
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation.
u)
W The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
The'
:�L
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
W W - I
ATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
WL 1�_Z
WL
g T
Irerracon
,WL.
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
09
BORING COMPLETED 'j
RIG I DRILLER
LOGGED JMBJJOB# 81065097
0
0
E�
I
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 2 Pa Of �,
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovalflons
SAMPLES TESTS
[2
0 W U,
co
0 DESCRIPTION
>: z
M Cr
>- cc LU z
M
U) yj > Cr Ui z z
(0 Uj 0 3: LU Z) 0
a.
<
a:
a. 0 U 0 Z >- 0 Cr
LU C/) Lu -j 0 C� t Z �-
0 Z) z Cn ED 0 0. DO
SILTY SAND, mottled tan and orange,
loose, damp
3
SILTY FINE SAND WITH SOME
GRAVEL, mottled tan and orange,
medium dense, moist
6
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation.
0
Lo
z
lu
0
' In The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
ATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
BORING STARTED 4-17-071
I OMPL.
BORING COMPLETED
Irerracon
WIL
Z
FRIG
DRILLER
W
WIL
3z
0
6
0 JM
LOGGED JMB
JOB # 8106509L)
WIL
S
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 3
Page I of I
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLE
TESTS
0
DESCRIPTION
0
M
0 CL
LU:E
z
zt�
3f
U)
cr
LU
LU
>
z
z
Cc UJI
U_ co
ZZ
3:
a.
W
U)
0
uj
CL
>-
0
0
LU
>
a. 2
LU
�- Z
0
�
cc "a
0 LU
z
Cc
0
D
z
1--
Cc
U) M
U
a CL
Z) U)
SILTY SAND, tan and brown, loose to
1
:1
medium dense, damp (Probable Fill)
and orange, dense, moist
-2
Test pit completed at 6.5 feet on 4/17/07.
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation.
9)
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
:2 T h a�' d rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
between soil an
W W
ATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
X
V�
WL 7
Irerracon
W L 1 77
VV'WL ......
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
BORING COMPLETED
RIG DRILLER
LOGGED JMB I JOB # 8106509T
� 0
9
LOG OF TEST PIT NO.
4
Page 1 of I
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
ITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLES
TESTS.
0
M
tn
UJ
C)
DESCRIPTION
>:
cc
3f (j) LU
U)
LU
>
0
z
0C Zw
LU F-
Z)
0 z
Uj
EL
I
F-
(L C)
LU U)
Ld
M 0
LL)
CL -j
F- z
< 0
>-
CC15
L)
Z
a
cc
C/3 (o
3:0
0 CL
:)
-2-�—z
brown, loose.
orange, medium
5
Test pit completed at 6 feet on 4/17/07.
No groundwater seepage observed at time
of excavation.
Slight caving from 0-1.5 feet observed at
time of excavation.
U) The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
u
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
VATION
1i WATER LEVEL OBSER 7S,ft
L
L Irerracon
WIL
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
BORING COMPLETED
RIG DRILLER
LOGGED JMB � JOB# 1310650971
0
0
0
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 5
Page 1 of I
Bridge Architecture
PROJECT
Edmonds, FA
Old Milltown Renovations
SA PIL
TESTS
0
E
ZP
Vi
CL
Uj:E
DESCRIPTION
HSAMP>LES
>:
X
11�
i�
K i.-
U)
(n
uj
In
LU
U,
>
0
0
z �3
cc U'i
W i_-
D
LL co
ZZ
Lu
U.1
U)
L)
C/)
2
U,
W
CL
'L
>_
(j
LU
'L
07-
>_
M: z
cc
Z I.-
Z
M
W co
3: U
0 CL
D U)
AND SOME GRAVEL brown,
amp (Probable fill)
TRACE C )BB LES,_ tan and orange,
medium dense, moist '
il
Test pit completed at 5 feet on 4/17/07.
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation. .
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between s6il and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
;�� —L _7
;TV —L X
_% T. 1 rerracon
WL
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
BORING COMPLETED
RIG DRILLER
0 JMB
LOGGED JMB JOB #
0
9
0
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 6 Page 1 oi I
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLES
TESTS
0
DESCRIPTION
0
C3
4�
ap
LU
U
a:
LU
cc
LU
>
z �n_
a: LU
0
U_ 0
ZZ
a.
U)
M
2
LU
CL
0
3:
uj
1-0
< z
0 LU
q:
Z�
LU
0
U)
D
D
z
or
cc: t
SILTY SAND SOME GRAVEL, brown,
loose, damp (Probable Fill)
2
FINE SAND SOME SILT AND GRAVEL
TRACE GRAVEL, brown and orange,
medium dense, moist
5-
6
Test pit completed at 6 feet on 4/17/07.
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation.
0
co
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
WATER LEVEL OBSERV ATIONS, ft
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
BORING.COMPLETED
Irerracon
WL
Z
IT
WL
-Z
RIG
DRILLER
LOGGED im BIJOB#
8106�55OJ97
cc WL
2
is
is
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 7
Page I of 1
CLIENT
.
Bri dge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLES
TESTS
0
0
C�
el
0 CL
Uj
0
j
DESCRIPTION
>_
M
4i
F_:
3f
�� F.-
U
a:
W
W
>
z
a: z
LU
U_ (D
zz
M
A
CO
2
LU
EL
0
()
�_ 0
LU �-
Z
0 LU
0 Cc
CC
LU
CD
Z)
7)
z
LU
0- _5
Lo
0
CC
0 CL
Z
0
_2
brown, loose, damp (Fill)
E COBBLES, tan and orange,
m dense, moist
5
(n
Lu The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
W L -7 [BORING COMPLETED
C
z X RIG DRILLER
oWL - Irerracon,_
LOGGED. JMBIJOE3# 8106509j
cl WL
0
W
0 0
0
�-1
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 8
Page I of I
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLE
TESTS
0
12
0
co
>:
e
UI
Uj
q
DESCRIPTION
zt�
K,
Y
Cn
Ui
LU
>
z
Cr UZI
-2
D
LZL 'Z5
a.
Lo
0
M
2
LU
EL
0
2
FL 0
LU
<
>_
0 LU
UZ
ir
LU
En
D
cc
a_ ,
U) Co
0z
U
't
0
�C'-
C/)
0
SILTY SAND SOME GRAVEL AND
DEBRIS.SCATTERED ZONES OF
BLACK SILT, brown, loose, damp to
moist
4" pipe at 2 feet (Fill)
4.5
FINE SAND SOME GRAVEL AND
TRACE COBBLES, B tan and brown,,
medium dense, moist
5—
16
Test pit completed at 6 feet on 4/17/07.
No caving or seepage at time of
excavation.
Q
z
0
a:
a.
�2
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types; in -situ, the transition may be gradual,
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED 4-17-07
W L !LZ X BORING COMPLETED
I—V RIG DRILLER
WL 7- Irerracon
0
WL LOGGED JMBIJOB# 610
0
, 6-
49
101
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 9
Pa 011
LI ENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJECT
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLES
TESTS
0
LU:Xf
DESCRIPTION
>:
Cr
K
3�
(n
cc
W
LU
>
z
Lzu
D
Uz- ZD
3:
CL
<
CL
LU
(n
0
CA
M
:�
n
ui
CL
>.
0
0
W
(L _j
LU �-
�_ z
0
>_
a: 16
0 W
L) a:
Z�_
cr
Q
a -4-2
-Z -
-
-+-
CC
I
CD M
0 CL
Z) U)
brown, loose, damp
TRACE C BBLES.- tan and orange,
medium dense, moist
Test pit completed at 6 feet on 4/17/07.
No groundwater seepage observed at lime
of excavation.
Slight caving observed at 04' at time of
excavation.
5
w
Lu The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
13; between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft
WL
W L
711rerracon
0 WL
to
BORING STARTED 4-17-07
BORING COMPLETED
RIG . I DRILLER
LOGGED JMBIJOBN 810650J97
0 0
0
0
LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 10 Pa el of 1
CLIENT
Bridge Architecture
SITE
PROJEC
Edmonds, WA
Old Milltown Renovations
SAMPLE
TESTS
0
DESCRIPTION
0
C3
LU z
3f
Cn
a:
Uj
LU
>
z
Ir
U_ CU
z
<
LU
(n
(n
M
D
LU
EL
0
z
0
>_
cr t
0 UJ
0 a:
7 �-
fr
U) M
3:0
0 CL
Z) W
SILTY SAND SOME GRAVEL ND
TRACE ROOTS, ZONES OF BLAQ
SILT, brown, loose, damp
FINE SAND SOME SILT AND GRAVEL,
TRACE COBBLES, tan and orange,
medium dense, moist
5-
6
Test pit complete at 6 feet on 4/17/07.
No caving or seepage observed at time of
excavation.
The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines
between soil and rock types: in -situ, the transition may be gradual.
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED 4-17-07
WL BORING COMPLETED
WIL Irerracon RIG DRILLER
WL LOGGED JMBIJOB# 81065097
0 0
0
0
0
APPENDIX B
EXCERPT FROM 1989 REPORT
BY
THORNE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
81065097
ENVIRONMENT
Page 4
University Savings Bank 5E-1044-1
July 6, 1989
2.0 FIELD ACrIVMES
1be subsurface test pit explorations were conducted at the site by A.I. Sleister & Sons
Construction of Edmonds, Washington between May 30 and June 2, 1989. A total of six test
pits were excavated at the locations shown on the attached Figure 2. Under a subsequent scope
of work, we were retained to observe the conditions exposed in soils borings completed by others
on June 19, 1989. These borings; were intented to provide soils engineering data. Ile locations
of the two borings,we observed, B-2 and B-3, are also indicated on Figure 2.
A photoioni . zation detector (PID) was used to field screen the. soils for organic vapors.
However, the concentrations detected were considered to be serni-quantitative since the
measurements were obtained in the open atmospbere about one to two inches above. the
excavated soils. The instrument used was a Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc. Model
580A OVK caUbrated to benzene. The PID had an operating range from 0 to 2,000 parts per
million (ppm) with a minimum detection limit of 0.1 PPM
Selected samples were obtained from the materials excavated from. the test pits since the
unshored excavations could not be entered. The soil samples collected from the borings were
obtained from split -spoon samplers. Hand tools used to collect the soil samples into containers
were decontaminated prior to ea'ch use by washing with detergent, followed by a distMed water
rinse. However, the augers and sampling rods used in the geotechnical study completed by
others were not steam cleaned prior to use since the borings were intended only for soils
engineering data.
Glass jars sealed with Teflon -lined lids were used to contain each sample. The jars were labeled
as to their respective origins and placed in a chilled ice chest for transport to the contract
laboratory. Cbain-of-custody procedures were used to document the sample handling.
2.1 Subsurface Exploraflons in the Upper Parking Lot
Test pits TP-1, TP-2, and TP-3 were excavated with a backhoe on May 30, 1989. These
excavations extended to a depth of about eleven feet below the existing ground surface� at the
south, north and west sides of the estimated 10,000-gallon capacity steel tank underlying the
-upper parking lot. The excavations indicated that the tank was aligned north to south with a
length of about 18 feet and a diameter of eight feet. The soils encountered in the test pits
r consisted of trace silty, sand FILL which extended to the fidl depths explored by the test pits.
L Groundwater was not observed in the test pits. No hydrocarbon odors or sheens were detected
in the excavated soils and the PD:) did not indicate the presence of detectable organic vapor
concentrations. Soil samples for laboratory analysis were collected from the bottom of test pits
TP-4, T?-2 and T?-3; these samples were identified as 'Tank 1 SV, 'Tank I S2" and 'Tank 1
SY, respectively. The test pits in the upper parking lot were backfil.led by compacting about
one -foot thick lifts of the excavated soils with the backhoe. bucket. The final three soil lifts
were each compacted with a portable, gasoline -powered compactor. The densities, of the
compacted soils were not measured, as this was outside the scope of work.
0 0
@04OR4
ENVIRONMENT
LJniversity Savings Bank Page 5
July 6, 1989 5E-1044-1
On June 19, 1989, a truck -mounted Mobile B-61 drill with hollow -stem. augers was used to com-
plete boring B-2 which was cast of the upper tank as shown on Figure 2. Although this boring
was part of a separate geotechnical engineering study by others, we had been requested by
University Savings Bank to obseNe the drilling and collect soil samples, Ile boring penetrated
to about 24 feet below ground surface in unsaturated, gravelly SAND. The PID showed a max-
imlim of 0.2 pprn of organic vapors in the split -spoon drive samples obtained. at about five feet
intervals in the boring. Soil samples for chemistry analyses were collected at about 16 and 21
feet below ground surface; these samples were identified as "B-2 S-4" and "B-2 S-6", respectively.
2.2 Subsurface Explorations on the Western Portion of the Site
2.2.1 Southern Side of Landscaped Area
An FM radio -band survey was conducted on May 30, 1989 in the south side of the landscaped
area to explore the extent of the piping connected to the three fin caps on Maple Street. Ile
survey was completed by attaching a wire to the.pipe and searching the surrounding area with
a FM receiver for a return signal. This survey indicated the three fill pipes converged to the
north under the sidewalL However, the response did not persist ten feet to the north of the
r
fill caps and a signal could not be found elsewhere in the lanoscaped area. Test pits TP-5 and
iuiface in
TP-6 were then excavated to a depth of about four feet below the existing ground the
landscaped area in an attempt to locate the piping. However, no piping could be located in
these explorations.
Conversations with Lt. Stan Olsen of the Edmonds Fire Department and with other local
residents indicated that other underground storage tanks in the lower landscaped area were
removed prior to the converslon of the Old MW into a site for small shops in 1973.
2.2.2 Northern Side of Landscaped Area
The antique fue, pump on the northern side of the landkaped area was unbolted,from the
concrete pad on May 30, 1989 to check for piping that may'hay.e connected to a tank- No
piping was observed on the surface. of the concrete slab., .
On May 30, 1989, an estimated 1,000-gaflon capacity steel tank was discovered below the
exposed vent line near the public TeStrooms. This tank was about 3.5 feet in diameter by more
.
than eight feet in length and appeared to be filled with oil. The east end of the tank was
overlain by a wooden boardwalk and immediately north of the tank was a buDding foundation.
Test pit T?4 was hand -bored to a depth of about seven feet below ground surface -on the
western end of the tank. Soils encountered in the test pit consisted of about three ' feet of
L
imported organic -rich, sandy SILT (top -soil) overlying native, silty SAND with cobbles. A soil
sample for quantitative chemistry analyses was obtained at depth of about 6.5 below the existing
ground surface in the hand boring. This sample was identified as "Tank 2 S?. Groundwater
was observed in test pit TP4 at a depth of about seven feet below the eAsting ground surface.
Hydrocarbon -like odors were detected below a depth of about six feet in the test pit. Bas-d
on the hydrocarbon odors and discussions with Mr. Voss, the hand boring was deepened on June
2, 1989. A soil sample identified as 'Tank 2 ST' was collected in this test pit at approximately
nine feet below the existing ground surface; auger refusal in gravels was then encountered below
this depth.
0 0
ENVIROMMENTJ
University Savings Bank Page 6
July 6, 1989 5E-1044-1
-gallon capacity tank -
on June 19, 1999, a boring was drilled about five feet south of the 1,000
Tbis boring, idtatified as B-3,.wa's'completad by ot ; hers as part of a geotechnical engineering
study. A portable Acker drilling rig equipped with hollow -stem augers was fised to drill and
sample the soils. Groundwater was encountered in the boring beneath a depth of about 5.5 feet
below ground surface. We collected soil samples "B-3 S-Y and "B-3 S-4" in the boring at
depths of about five feet and nine feet below ground surface, respectively. The boring was
terminated at about 12.5 feet below the existing ground surface due to auger refusal in gravelly
soils.
3.0 IABORATORY ANALYSES
3.1 Analysis Procedures
Chernical. analysis of the collected soil samples was performed by AmTest, Inc. of Redmond,
Washingtom
The three samples collected in test pits TP-1, TP-2 and TP-3 by the tank in the upper parking
'rank I S2 Tank 1 S3) were analyzed for the
lot (identified as samples Tank 1 S1, and
concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons and selected volatile aromatic hydrocarbons common to
hereafter referred to
automotive fuels (�pecifically, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes,
as BTEX). EPA Methods 8015(modified) and 8020 were used to complete the fuel hydrocarbon
and BTEX analyses, respectively. These tests were selected since the size of the tank and the
in th ank
historic site information suggested that diesel or gasoline fuels were stored e t
Since the 1,000-g'allon capacity tank appeared to have contained oi� sample 'Tank 2 Sl" from
near the water -table surface in test pit T?-4 was selected for quantitative chemistry analyses.
This sample, from a depth of about 6.5 feet below ground surface, was analyzed for: 1) Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations by EPA Method 418.1; 2) EP -toxicity for metals
by EPA Method 1320; 3) chlorinated solvents by EPA Method 8010; and 4) polychlorinated
L
biphenyls (PCB) by EPA Method 8080. Sample 'Tank 2 SZ' Erom. about nind feet below the
existing grqund surface in test pit TF-4 was then analyzed after the 'Tank 2 S-I" results were
reported to US.
The soil samples from borings B-2 and B-3 were analyzed for the T?H concentrations by EPA
Method 418.1.
The analytical results and detection Hmits are shown in tl�e laboratory analysis reports in
Appendix A. The mg/kg units reported -by the analytical laboratory approximate part per
million (ppm.) concentrations.
3.2 Analytical Results
3.2.1 Upper Parking Lot Tank - park-Ing
Tic fael hydrocarbon analyses on the samples Erom the test pits adjacent to the uppe.
lot tank (samples Tank I Sl, Tank 1 S2 and Tank I S3) showed that gasoline, diesel I I and
L diesel #2 concentrations were non -detected at the analytical detection limits of 20, 25 lr3Ld .10
mg/kg, respectively. The results of the BTEX analyses also demonstrated that thcie com.poures
were non -detected at the analytical detection limits. Tle BTEX analysis limits were: ')
mglkg for benzene', toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene; and 2) 0.010 mg/k,-, for rn-and p-xy! �s
w
z
r
t
L
0
Antique
Fuel
PUMP)
TP-4 U F7
B-3 &
Landscaped
Area
TP-5[j
000Fill
0
DAYTON STREET
Old Mill
Retail Shops
000 TP-2
Tank 10,000-gal
Tank
TP-3
Upper
Paddng
Lot
TP-1
MAPLE STREET
EXPLANATIO
Not to Scale
Number and Approximate
Test PH Location
Number and Approximate
Bodng Locagon By Others
PgNTHORNE
ENVIRONMENTAL
Dau June 1989
Projiect Nur.mc—: SE-1044-11
8-2
I
�1
University Savings Bank
Old Mill, Edmonds, %AIA Figure
S',TE PLAN AND
SAMPLE L-OCA-TION MAP
0
0
0
APPENDIX C
EXCERPT FROM 2006 REPORT
BY
FARALLON CONSULTING, INC.
81065097
0
0
0
GPA, Inc.
May 11, 2006
Page 4
temporary well using a peristaltic pump and dedicated polyethylene tubing. The
temporary wells were purged for several minutes prior to sample collection to allow for
removal of fine sediment particles suspended during the advancement of the borings.
Reconnaissance groundwater samples were collected directly from the tubing outlet into
lab=tory-pTepared containers. The reconnaissance groundwater samples were
submitted for laboratory analysis of DRO and ORO by Northwest Method NWTP14-Dx,
GRO by Northwest Method NWTPH-Gx, BTEX by EPA Method 8021 B, and dissolved
RCRA 8 Metals by EPA Methods 200.9 and 7470A (Appendix C).
The soil and reconnaissance groundwater sample containers were clearly labeled using
a unique sample number and placed immediately in an iced cooler. The soil samples
were submitted to OnSite Environmental, hic. of Redmond, Washington under.standard
chain -of -custody protocols.
SUBSURF ACE UWESTIGATION RESULTS
The results of the subsurface investigation field activities and laboratory analyses are
presented below. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Borings B I and B2 were
advanced in the landscaped area on the southwest portion ofthe Site to evaluate soil and
groundwater conditions adjacent to kDown and suspected former USTs (Figure 2).
Boring B3 was advanced adjacent to a suspected UST vent line identified during the Site
reconnaissance, Borings. B4 and B5 were advanced inside -the northern portion of the
building in the fon.-ner garage area (Figure 2). The laboratory analytical results for soil
samples collected fxom the borings are summarized on Tables I and 2. Tables. 3 and 4
summarize the analytical results for reconnaissance groundwater samples. A copy of
the complete laboratory report for the soil. and reconnaissance groundwater sample
analyses is provided in Appendix C.
SOIL
The soil encountered in boring B1 consists of approximately 4 feet of poorly graded
sand with gravel and silt overlying poorly graded silty sand and sand with gravel and
silt. Borings B2 through B5 encountered soil consisting of poorly graded fine to
medium grained sand with trace amounts of gravel and silt. Sandy silt was encountered
from approximately 5 to 6 feet bgs in boring B3. The boring logs for borings BI
through B5 are provided in Appendix B. No field evidence of potential contamination,
such as unusual odor, discoloration, or sheen, was observed in any of the soil samples.
PID measurements recorded during the sample collection ranged from 0.0 to 0.2 parts
per million.
Concentrations of DRO, ORO, ORO, BTEX, and RCRA 8 Metals were not detected
above the MTCA Method A cleanup levels for soil or MTCA Method B cleanup levels
for soil, where Method A cleanup levels are not established, in any of the soil samples
analyzed from borings B I through B5 (Tables I and 2).
C;7%prpl�ds'J02 GPA%50.'001 Old " RP'ThS' 11 RPI dog
0
11
0
9
GROUNDWATER
GPA, Inc.
May 11, 2006
Page 5
Groundwater was encountered in borings Bl, B2, B4, and B5 at depths ranging from
5.5 to 6 feet bgs, groundwater was not encountered in boring B3. Reconnaissance
groundwater samples were collected ftom borings 131, B2, B4, and B5. Concentrations
of ORO, GRO, BTEX, and dissolved RCRA 8 Metals were not detected above the
MTCA Method A cleanup levels for groundwater or MTCA Method B cleanup levels
for groundwater, where Method A cleanup levels are not established (Tables 3 and 4).
DRO was detected above the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 500 niicrograms per
liter (�igll) in the reconnaissance groundwater sample collected from boring B2 at a
concentration of 4,400 )ig/l (Table 4) (Figure 2). DRO was not detected above the
laboratory practical quantitation lirnit (PQL) of 250 �tg/l in reconnaissance groundwater
samples collected from borings Bl, B4, and B5.
CONCLUSIONS
The laboratory analytical results detected concentrations of DRO above the MTCA
Method A cleanup levels in groundwater in the vicinity of boring B2, located near the
former UST in the southwest comer of the Site. DRO was detected in the
reconnaissance groundwater sample collected from boring B2 at a concentration of
4,400 jig/], which is above the MTCA Method A cleanup level for groundwater of 500
pg/l. However, DRO was not detected above the laboratory PQL in the soil samples
collected from boring B2, indicating that shallow soil has not been impacted in this
area. The concentration of DRO detected in groundwater in boring B2 is indicative of a
small, localized release. Based on Farallon's review of the envirom-nental activities on
the Arco Facility No. 822, located west of the Site, the groundwater flow direction in
the Site vicinity is towards the west (Figure 1). Concentrations of DRO in shallow
groundwater may have migrated off of the property beneath 5h Avenue South.
However, there is insufficient data to evaluate the extent of off -site migration of DRO.
in groundwater -
Results of the subsurface investigation confirm that shallow subsurface soil beneath the
former truck shop and garage has not been impacted by historical Site activities. Based
on the results of the soil samples analyzed firom boring BI, the shallow soil
contamination identified during the investigation conducted by Thome Environmental,
Inc. does not appear to have impacted groundwater in the vicinity of the 1,000-gallon
UST.
11 ROPhal" 'tP' d-
DAYTON STREET
SUSPECTED LIST VENTLINE
Lu
W
z
0
FORMER GARAGE FORMER TRUCK STORE I
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
z CLOSED -IN -PLACE 1,000-GALLON LIST
Ln
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
I CLOSED -IN -PLACE 10,000-GALLON LIST
0
U) L_J
U)
< I—
uj z
<
L)
n 0
U) uJ 2nd STORY PARKING
a 40
IPIRIIIIIIE 11ALIE 11 111
B2
0 0 o— SUSPECTED FILL PORTS
—MAPLE STREET
LEGEND FIGURE 2
SITE BOUNDARY SITE PLAN WITH BORING LOCATIONS
CENTER LINE OLD MILL TOWN
0 HISTORICAL GASOLINE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
UN13ERGROUND STORAGE TANK WISDAtDENTIFIED
ON 1926 SANBORN FIRE INSURAN E P FARALLON CONSUlTING
320 3rd AvL NE
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE Issaquah, WA 68027 FARALLON PN: 502-001
Drawn BY: DEW cked By; CB I D.t.:4/6/06 I Disk Reference: 502001
0
FARALLoN CONSULTING
Log of Boring: B1
320 3rd Avenue WE,
Issoquah, WA 9B027
Page I of I
Client: GPA, Inc.
DatofTlma Started: 5/02105 1600 SamplarType: WWIPDIYG[eve
Project: Old Milltown Building
Daterl"Irno Completed: 5102106 1730 Drive Hammer (lbs.): NA
Location: Edmonds, WA
Equipment: Geo Probe Depth of Water ATD (ft bgs): 6
Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling. IncTotal Boring Depth (ft bgs): a
Drilling.Foreman: Casey Total Wall Depth (ft bgs)-, a
Farallon PN: 502-001
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Logged BY: John Schmitt
Cn
BoringrvVell
Lithologic Description
>
C:
<
Construction
U)
to
CD
U
Sample ID
CL
Details
CL
a)
C
0
0-2'Hand dig. 0-I'Tcpsoil.
SP-Sm
V-2'SAND with gravel, minor sill, brown, molst.
Attempt todrive probe 2'-6'. no recovery due to rock. move off hole
and attempt second drive. Hand auger to 4'
4�-51 Silty SAND, minor gravel. dark brown to black, loose, molst, no
SM
odor
V4 Becomes SAND, fine to medium gralned. minor gravel, minor slit,
SP
77
gray
BI-5-8
x
---------------------------------------------
V-S'Secomes trace silt, line to coarse gravel, coarse gravel at 8%
100
se
Temporary
well screen
brown, wet, no odor.
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample. cloudy, yellowish brown.
B 1 -7-8
02
81-RGW
x
Well Construction Information Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Monument Type: NA
Casing Diameter (inches): I Filter Pack: NA Top of Casing Elevation (ft): NA
Screen Slot Size (inches): 0010 Surface Seal: NA Boring Abandonment: Bentonite
Screened Interval (ft bgs); 3-8 Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA Y: NA
OFF
r,,ARAL1,ON CONSULTING)
32
0 .3rd Avenue NE
Issaquah. WA 98027
C je
lient: GPA, lnc-.
Project: Old Milltown Building
Location: Edmonds, WA
Farallon PN: 502-001
Logged By: Johr, Schmitt
Log of Boring: B2
Pago I of 1
DatefTime Started:
5102/06 1740
SamplerType: 4'w/polysleve
Date/Time Completed;
5/02106 1825
Drive Hammer (lbs.).* NA
Equipment.,
Geo Probe
Depth of Water ATD (ft bgs): 55
Drilling Company:
Cascade Drilling,
IncTotal Boring Depth Ift bgs): 8
Drilling Foreman:
Casey
Total Well Depth (ft bgs): 8
Drilling Method:
Direct Push
Lithologic bescription
a E
Q
a 04'CONCRETE
4"-5.5'SAND, fine to medium grained, trace flne, gravel, trace silt,
brown. moist. no odor
co
CL
co
a)
EJ
Sample ID
U
U
0
0
C3
Go
SIR WO
100
';tV,
5—
---------------------------------------------
s &-V Becomes fine to coarse grained, wet
100
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample, slightly yellowish.
Monument Type: NA
Casing Diameter (inches): 1
screen Slot Size (Inches): 0 D10
Screened Interval (ft b9s); 3-8
B2-2-4
0.1 1 B2-5-6 I x
B2-RGW I X
BoringtWell
Construction
Details
Temporary
Well Screen
well Construction Infurmat on Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Filter Pack: NA Top of GasIng Elevation (ft); NA
Surface Seal: NA Boring Abandonment; Bentorille
Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA I Y: NA
11
0
0
FARALLoN CowsuLTiNa,
Log of Boring: B3
320 3rd Avenue 14E
Issaquah, WA 9BO27
Page I of I
Client: GPA, Inc.
Date/Time Started: 5/02/06 1825 Sampler Type: 4'w/poly sleve
Project: Old Milltown Building
Daterrime Completed; 5102106 1900 Drive Hammer (lbs.): NA
Location: Edmonds, WA
Equipment: Geo Probe Depth of Water ATD (ft bgs): NA
Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling, Inc Total Boring Depth (ft b9s): a
Drilling Foremen: Casey Total Well Depth (ft bgs): NA
Farallon PN: 502-001
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Logged BY: John Schmitt
V)
CL
BoringAAfell
Lithologic Description
C2
>
<
Construction
CL
CL
U>
U
12
Sample ID
2
Details
U)
2
0
0.4" CONCRETE
Co
4"-5'SAND, fine to medlum grained. minor line gravel. trace to manor
SP
silt, brown. moist. no odor, roots present
75
0 1
B3-3-4
x
5-
5'.6' Sandy SILT. brown, moist, no odor, organics and wood ash
ML
(black)
0.1
133-5-6
75
6'-B'SAND with silt, ff no to medium grained, brown. moist, no odor
Sm
Refusal at 8'
0.0
33-7-8
x
MonumentTypo: NA Well Construction Information Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Casing Diameter (inches): NA Filter Pack; NA Top of Casing Elevation (ft); NA
Screen Slot Size (inches): NA Surface Seal: NA Boring Abandonment: Bentonite
Screened Interval (ft bgs): NA Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA Y: NA
0 0
0
FARALLoN CONSULTIN(
Log of Boring: B4
.320 3rd Avenue NE
Issaquah, WA 98027
Pago 11 of 1
Client: GPA, Inc.
DatellIme Started: 5/02106 1900 Sampler Type: - 4'wlpoly sieve
Project: Old Milltown Building
DateMme Completed: 5102106 1945 Drive Hammer (Ibs.): NA
Location: Edmonds, WA
Equipment-, Geo Probe Depth of Water ATD (ft b9s): 6
Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling, Inc,Total Boring Depth (ft bgs): 8
Drilling Foremen' Casey Total Well Depth (ft bgs); 8
Farallon PN: 502-001
Drilling Method- Direct Push
— Logged BY: John SchMitt
Boring/Well
—0.
0
Lithologic Description
L2
>
0
<
Construction
L)
a
U
5'
Sample ID
-9
CL
Details
(n
0
04"CONCRETE
Co
4*4 SAND, with gravel. traca silt, brown, moist, no odor
SP
-
---------------------------------------------------
3'-4 S'Secomes SAND, fine grained, minor silt, grey -brown, moist, no
SP-SM
odor
02
B4-3-4
x
------------------------------------------------------
4 5-W Becomes SAND, fine to medium grained. trace silt, brown. with
SIR
orange mottling at V
0.1
84-5-6
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample, cloudy, yellow -orange.
100
X
Temporary
well scramn
02
54-7-8
B4-RGW
x
Monument Type: NA Well Construction Information Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Casing Diameter (inches): I Filter Pack: , NA Top of Casing Elevation (ft): NA
Screen Slat Size (inches): 0010 Surface Seal. NA Boring Abandonment: . Benlonite
Screened Interval (it bgs); 3-8 Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA Y: NA
0
E
0
EARALLON CONSULTING
Log of Boring: B5
320 3rd Avenue ME
Issaquah, WA 9B027
Page I of I
Client: GPA, Inc.
Dato/Time Started; 5102tO6 1945 Sampler Type: 4'wipoly sieve
Project: Old Milltown Building
Dateftime Completed- St02106 2030 Drive, Hammer (Ibs,): NA
Location: Edmonds, WA
Equipment: Geo Probe Depth of Water ATD (ft bgs): B
Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling. Inc Total Boring Depth (it bg s): a
Drilling Foreman: Casey Total Well Depth (ft bgs), a
Farallon PN: 502-001
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Logged BY: John Schmitt
M
.2
V
BoringfWall
Lithologic Description
(9
>
0
C
<
Construction
5
CL
E
L'
C
m
Sample ID
CL
Details
CL
M
67
Lo
M
U)
=3
0
E
M
U3
0-4* CONCRM
Co
4"-51 SAND. line to medium grained, trace flne gravel, trice slit
SP
100
135-34
x
5 —
----------------------------------------------
-Vn
51-6! Semmes fine to coarse
135-5-6
------------------------- -------------------
6'-W Becomes wet
100
Temporary
well screen
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample. cloudy, yellowish.
B5-RGW
x
I
Well Construction Information
Monument Type: NA Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Filter Pack: NA
Casing Diameter (inches): 1 Top of Casing Elevation (ft): NA
Screen Slot Size (inches): 0010 Surface Seall: NA Boring Abandonment- Benlonlie
Screened Interval (ft b9s): 3-8 AnnularSeal; NA Surveyed Location: X: NA -Y: NA
PLANNING DATA
SIGNS
SITEADDRESS: '1-('l 55"" A-V, 4t-1 ZONING:
DATE: 001 110015 PLAN CHK#:
NAM E OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICANT: �AA* 7,aD 6 G LA 10
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:- IL111
and 126tivii-,&I W011t -S%'4n to rf=�Pj4ce OtA PIJ� /)V)
D"e'V5 .
ADB FILE #: OR DATE WAIVED: 0 0 q—
PLANS MATCH APPROVED PLAN:
TOTAL AREA PFR TYPF nF -qir.M-
TOTAL
Sign area
Allowed
Matrix
Area
allowed
Type of
in
,Conditions
Allowed Per
for this
Sign
Zone?
Met?
Unit
Unit
sign
Example
Wall, wl
Yes, wl
Yes
I sq. ft.1lin.
411bot
41 square
Internal
cond.
ft. o f
attached
feet
.111um.
attached
wall
wall
SIGN 1
vi I
' >tA'1<
vvj
W,
\\N (f
I V
OaL d
. '
71
A
1 W
in LAVIA
W%
.1
SIGN 2
Wall
1-4-- 40. 0
+1D. A 2-
5 (A 1-9
r jj
P
rl
)YM I.
--
SIGN 3
SAVICI
Soap to
t" c4,c
A I
TOTAL SIGN AREA FOR SITE I TENANT:
Maximum Allowed:_ 14. 40. C)40.,4 - 2�—Previous Total:
Proposed Total:
1Afibrary\p1anning\forrw & handoutsWaff reports\'p1andat—SfGN.doc
SIGN HEIGHT:
Sign Type:
Maximum Allowed:
Actual Height:_
Sign Type:
Maximum Allowed:
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Maximum Allowed: Actual Height:_
SIGN LIGHTING: 'DO
. tjo
Sign Typ
Lighting Proposed:
Allowed i�n is-2!!6ne':I
Sign Type-., _Lighting
Proposed:
owed in this Zone:
All I
� ;: . , .. 1 1.
Sign Type:
Lighting Proposed:
Allowed in thii Zone:.
. I !
SIGN COLORS:
Proposed:
Acceptable?
SIGN LOCATION:
Requires ADB Approval?
Proposed: ( 0 X ) 'Atd I I st d WKA'
If Freestanding A �3et or over (unless on a fence) meets setbacks?_
Required Setbacks:
Front: Left Side: -Right Side: Rear:
Actual Setbacks:.
Front: Left Side: -Right Side: Rear:
LANDSCAPING FOR F
Size:
Loca
G SIGNS:.,
CRITICAL AREAS # (Freestanding Sjgns�,qnly):
Waiver I MeetiC`A"r'eq'u'ir'ements'
REDUCED SITE PLAN (8.5X11) PROvidEb FOR STREET FILE?
OTHER:
Plan Review By: a44AA-1 Wl/t`�
[Alibrary\p1anningWomis & handouts\staff reports\Aplandat—SIGN-doc
. ....... ... .... ..... ..
X
)7 7
I W: I js
js 92�
90� Wo, I
# Z#,
9# L#
ply
ril
�k. NY, q
co
LLI
... ... 11 -aq aL a�-Ira .
aw o
u,M:2.q .
1�j L--�a! I 1-00ALark.
jk, '--a
is 9�9 61ff
is
PLANNING DATA
-- sign5
Name:
Date: IF
Site Address:
,e
A,
Plan.Check 9-
Project Description:
,
CA
.
Reduced Site Plan Provided:
NO)
Zoning.
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Map Page:
Comer Lot: NO)
Flag Lot: (YES
ADB File (or date waived):
TOTAL Area Mr 7ype of
Type of Sign
Allowed in
Matrix
conditions
Allowed
area per
Unit
TOTAL sign
area
Proposed
zone?
met?
unit
allowed for
sign area'
this sign
Exa-ple
Wall wlintemal
Illuminavon
Yes, -ith
condoons
Yes
I sq. ItIlyneal
/t. attdched
41 ft attdched
Wa//
4 1 squdre feet
20 5quare feet
W3//
Sign # I
WbAk
Sign #2
GX4 ;Lr-%J�
Sign #3
e� rn
C- ov
—FPrevious
TOTAL Sign Area fort&7,3n.05ite
Max Permitted:
To 1: Pre-41 OL^,s 51, -%s 247
ta W�
� Proposed Total:
Sign Height
Sign Type:
6 C-
Max Permitted: cV_
Actual Height: <
Sign Type:
Max Perm itted..
Actual Height:
Sign Type:
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Ligh&7g
Sign Type:
)J X\1
�Propos d:
Vo r%e
Allowed in Zone:
AS,
[Sign ype:
\'JU-11
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
Y,
PLANNING DATA
-- Signs --
Siqn -olors
Proposed:
Acceptable?
uires ADB Approval?
Req t4cp-..
Sign Locaticf7
If freestanding.and 3-feet or over (unless a fence) meets setbacks?
R u�r'iad SetbacA-5
Street:
Side:
Side:
Rear:
I
Actual: 'RYbacl
F
StreeL
Side:
Side:
Lands-caping'for-Free5t3hdinq,l�5i
Siz
Location:
Critical Areas Determination
Study Required
waiver
Other
'a� C�ONsl
EC_Z)C_ �,a�.Lj3.oqo.
Plan Review By:
>P
1\0 P,
F-F-47?
0
New
PW
0hem
W14
Load
.0 to-1 �\\5�
A 4/11
PLANNING DATA FSTREET FILE
New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects
Date: 41—Y-0-7
lite �ddress: tVA 4vs
Plan Check #: BLD
Project Description:
Use(s) Proposed: Jq0#7 tg &pp,
Allowed Use: (YES / NO
CUP File Number:
To Allow� Ises-
Legal Non65r7Z7ming Land Use Determination Issued: (YE,_
Reduced Site Plan Provided: (YES / NO)
Zoning:
Map Page:
Comp Plan Designation:
Corner Lo��EDS NO)
Flag Lot: (YES
AD13 File Number (date waived7
Lot Ar a:
Plans Match ADI3 Approved: (YES / NO)
Shoreline Required: (YECNOD)
Critical Areas Determination #: '2M-7
>f1study Required �?W6 4
El Waiver :210peZ L411&,r-0SJ0_>J f0k,*�Af
SEPA Determination:
XExempt
El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake
Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form).
Required Setbacks -)K J_t5'w-he*-e_ ot&aee�w�,tz? r-e-s.
Street:
Side:
Actual Setbacks -4ye S
Street:
Side-
6) Kim "-hr^�Ils
Side:
Rear:
Lot Coverage/FAR Required: 30�
Lot Coverage/FAR Provided:
..I JP W-0we'01-
Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations:
Building Height
Datum Point:
Datum Elevation:
Maximum Height: -4-
Actual Height:
Oubdivision:
Lot Aggregation Required:
Landscaping
Landscaping Matches ADI3 Approved:
Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO)
FBond Amount (100% Bid):
"S
Plan Review By:
PLANNING DATA STREET�F�ILE]
New Commercial I Multi -Family Projects
Commercial Parking Analysis A
Business Name Type/Use Parking Tenant Required
Ratio Area Parking
Total Parking Required.
Total Parking Provided.-
Vulti-Family Parking Anal is.
# Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit
Parking Ratio
# Units
Required
Parking
Studio
I Bedroom
1.5/D.U.
2 Bedrooms
1.8/D.U.
3 + Bedroopslll_�_
2.0/D.U.
Total Parking Required:
Total Parking Provided
Other
Plan Review By: ge�Va ae,�
#P20 CA File No:
ritical Areas Checklist
'ite 11 soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation)
L. Site Address/ Location: kArl
2. Property Tax Account Number: 4224T,10-j00100
3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
4. Is this site currently developed?
yes; — no.
ff yes; how is site developed? &OTa Ow VA I Uj" 9LAttpw!�q
5- Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat. less than 5-feet elevation change over entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of 66-feet).
Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet
over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet).
Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal
distance of less than 33-feet).
Other (please describe): fb"40'I Rq'RA *-r. et4c� prr flLtAj al %S11"19G,
.&A )NOV91i., 11-61 '&Lzm" 1±r-
6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth:
Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: Approx. Depth:
What season(s) of the year?
8. Site is in the floodway PkK floodplain of a watercourse.
ftr 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds surface? Flows are year-round?
Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? Y
10. Site is primarily: forested meadow shrubs mixed
urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 0,11 IT
10--
11. Obvious wetland is present on site: -t,,l or -
For City Staff Use 0 nly
1. Plan Check Number, if applicable? Noyle Oiftv�, - -
2. Site is Zoned?- 5(-, "(,0MML4njf!d 13LA5ftless
3. SCS mapped sod type(s)? 5(alde*woocl-uvV:>avttatictcomplex 2-9'1-91opes),j9(eV-"P_+i-
4. Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates Critical Area on site? LIVAF- MAI? indfc0*6
,&yps,joy�
5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? NO -
DETERMINATION
X-STUDY REQUIRED WAIVER
Reviewed by, Givia.Goccia.,- Date: "101 -kao(o
10C. 1%0%)
#.P20
City ot'sumonds
Development Services Department
Planning Division
Phone: 425.771.0220
Fax: 425.771.022 i-
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this fohn is to
be filled out by any person preparing a Development
Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to
his/her submittal of the application to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to
determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or
may be, present on the subject property. The information
needed to complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or data available at
City Hall (Critical areas inventories, maps, or soil
surveys).
Date Receiv;�d: 7/ 11 /Of -
City Receipt#: 000 1,
Critical Areas File#: CVLA&;re—Cj:3
Critical Areas Checklist Fee: $135.001-
Date Mailed to Applicant: q—Z.-ZoC6�
A property owner, or his/her authorized representative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date lt� and submit it
to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a
precursory site visit, and make a determination of the
subsequent steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy
of this form to assist City staff in fmding and locating the
specific piece of property described on this form. In
addition, the applicant shall 'include other pertinent
information .(e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or
studies 'in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff
in completing their prelinuinary assessment of the site.
The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees
to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds ham-dess from any and all damages, micluding reasonable
attorney's fees,'arising from any action or infi-action based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or
incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees.
By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibi with submitted are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and that I am authori e i ica no half of the owner as listed below.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTIA DATE 4JJA
Property Owner's Authorization I V I I
By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application,
and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the
purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
Owner/Ap licant
. �Sv r 1---fe-
Name
PA
Street Address
city State zip
Telephone: 4— cc r75 AzAe
Email address (optional):
Applicant Representative-
-t—w
�46-k
Nam� Nut t--
Street Address
city State Zip
Telephone:—,;?4co
Email Address (optional):
E
CITY OF EDMONDS
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT
Site Location: 201 5 1h Avenue South Tax Acct. Number: 00434212100100
Determination: Study Required Determination #: CRA-2006-0097
Applicant: Ralph W. Allen Owner: GPA Inc.
CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY REQUIRED (CRA-2006-0097)
During review and inspection of the subject site (the northern parcel - one of two parcels that
makes up "Old Milltown" — see map on page two of this report), it was found that the site may
contain or be adjacent to critical areas, including an Erosion Hazard Area, pursuant to Chapter
23.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The LIDAR map indicates
erosion potential, as the site slopes down from east to west at slopes of approximately 23% and
25% (see attached map).
GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Critical Areas Reports identify, classify and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject
property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any
potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development
proposal results in an alteration to a critical area the critical areas report will also contain a
mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and
delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to
complete the study. You may also choose submit the entire study with your specific
development application.
Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas which are
listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of
critical areas (see below).
Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in
the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study and an approved
list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for
more information.
General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110
through 23.40.140.
STUDY REQUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA
It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area.
• Erosion Hazard areas include Alderwood and Everett series soils on slopes of 15 percent or
greater. among others.
• Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined in ECDC 23.80.020.A.
In addition to the general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific
Critical Area report requirements for Erosion Hazard Areas (which are one of the
Geologically Hazardous Areas) are provided in ECDC 23.80.050.
Note that Stable Erosion Hazard Areas may have limited report requirements at the
director's discretion. At a minimum an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in
compliance with the requirements in ECDC Chapter 18.30 shall be required.
0
E
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS
Development is restricted within an Erosion Hazard Area.
Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical
Engineer or other qualified professional.
0 Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070.
ALLOWED ACTIVITIES
Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.20. If
you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed
activity, please contact a Planner for more information.
EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS
Certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC
23.40.230). If you think that a specific development proposal may be exempt, contact a Planner
for more information.
Gina Coccia, Planner 06��6� August 1. 2006
Name, Title %J Signature Date
NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on
the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
2
I
10 PLANNING DATA
-- signs
Name:
A
C
CArJWGV-P_
Date: (0-017
2/VO Fl,, -er (2-
Site Address: F
Plan Check ff: BLD-2 oy
Project Description: LA( 2- 4 on UAJ
116 lei
Reduced Site Plan Provided: NO) Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Designation: 00.��qowl\ 44 �UJY CV4 A y 0
(/ C
Map Page:
Corner Lot: NO)
Flag Lot: (YES Xft1Z_>
ADB File ff (or date waived):
TOTAL Area Type of
Type of Sign
Allowed in
zone?
matrix
conditions
Allowed
area per
Unit
TOTAL sign
area
allowed for
Proposed
sign area
met?
unit
this sign
Example
Wait wlintarnal
Alummation
Yes-, Witt)
conditions
res
ft. 8ttdched
41 ff. attached
W17//
41 square feet
20 square feet
Wa//
Sign #I
Wot
I r't
,44*1 �' �
VA
/_ 3 � L�
Sign #2
o�AC
Sign #3
< 3�
VIOL
r\
(Y\s vfk)
710TAL Sign Area for Tena,(MIS&
Max Permitted:
Previous Total:
Proposed Total:
Sign "Hi ht
or L
,. /� Actual Heigh
Sign Type: j&/a Max Permitted: / t: 4-
)C6 L (e- v , I "/-
Sign Type: tjp(l�
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:
Sign Type: 4+"v�
Max Permitted:
Actual Height:-- <
�Y_,Siqn LV"Wing
Sign Type: Wot Proposed: (?f —,d-,,A, -fowed in Zone:..-,.
Sign Type:
Proposed:
Allowed in Zone:
C -e-
PLANNING DATA STREET FILE
—Signs
51�7n Colors
Proposed: d4- 9 (4z
Acceptable?
Requires ADB Approval?
S,�gn Locati6n
If freestanding and 3-feet or over (unless
a fence) meets setbacks? A/,
Required Setback5
Street:
Side:
Rear:
Actual Setbacks
Street:
Side:
Side
Rear:
Landscaping for Freestanding Signs
Size:
Location:
Critical Areas Determination
StudyRequired
waiver
Other
Plan Review By: P - 6&�� '-/I 10 ( 0 �
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO. � .................... .................
104- 00100 NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO - -- -- ---- ----- ASMT. NO . .... ... ......
OWNER------------------------------------------------- ------ CONTRACTOR .............................................................................. ----- PERMIT NO. .................
JOB ADDRESS ----- 5-Tll --- AVFNi-TTE --- S. -------------------------- -------------------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO - ------------------ .............
F�
.................................. ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAMEOF ADDITION ............................................................................... - --------------------------------------
DYE TESTED ON SEVER
Approved:
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE -------------------------- -------- ------- By ................................... .......................
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERNaT
NEW CONSTRUCTION Ej REPAIRS 0 EASEMENT No. . .................... ....................
104-00100
OWNER ................. EdmondS flotor Co.
............................................................................................. CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERMIT No . ......................
ADDRESS............. 20.1 ... 5.th-Avana ... S� ................................................
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BLOCK No . ............................................
NAMEOF ADDITION ..... ....................................................................................
DYE TESTED ON SEWER
JULY, 1972
Approved:
DATE................................................ By ......................................................................
APPLICATION
for
The City of Edmonds SEDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS E] EASEMENT No . ..........................................
OWNER..... i ............................... .... CONTRACTOR .................................................................................................. PERAUT No . ......................
ADDRESS 5.tA-..0Je,--d --------------------------------------- ................ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT No . .............................................. BL4C)CK No . .......... .................................
0
uj
Lu
Lu
NAMEOF ADDITION .......................................................................................................................
A4.0—
Apprl
DATE................................................ By ......................................................................
The - City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO. ........................
102-07850 NEW CONSTRUCTION R REPAIRS LID NO - ------------- ASMT. NO - -----------
OWNER...... CAROL'- S -.3.0-UTIQUE ---------------- --------------------------- CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO . .............
JOB ADDRESS -------- 1-9�2-0-1 ---- 5TH --- AVE ------- S-; ............................ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAMEOF ADDITION --------------------- ------------ ......... -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
uj
__j - -
LL-
u")
DYE TESTED ON SEWER
Approved:
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE . .......................................... - By ------------------------------------------------------------
The City of Edmonds Side Sewer Drawing EASEMENT NO . .............................. -------------
102-J7850 NEW CONSTRUCTION F1 REPAIRS 0 LID NO . ...... ----------- ASMT. NO - -----------------
OWNTER...... CAPOOL-q-ROUTIQUE ----------------------------------------------- CONTRACTOR -------------------------------------------- ................. ..................... PERMIT NO. � ...................
JOB ADDRESS ---- 2-0.1-:7 ... 5-TH.-AvE.-...s .................................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . .......... --------------------------- BLOCK NO. — ---------------- ----------------
.......... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAMEOF ADDITION ------------------------------------------------ .................... -----------------------------------
I
DYE TESTED ON SEWER
Approved:
PWW-0001-11/75 (REV.11/78) DATE ............................................ By ------------------------------------------------------------
FARALLON CONSULTING
Log
of Boring:
B2
f-�j 320 .3,d Avenue NE
lssoquah, WA 98027
P1390 1 of I
Client: GPA, lnc-. DatafflmO Started: 5/02106 1740
SamplerType: 4�wlpotysleve
Project: Old witown Building Daterrime Completed-. 5/02/05 1825
Drive Hammer (lbs.): NA
ATD bgs)'. 55
Equipment: Geo Probe
Depth of Water (ft
Location: Edmonds, WA Drilling Company: Cascade
Drilling, IncTotal Boring Depth (ftbgs): 8
Farallon PN: 502-001 Drilling Foreman: Casey
Total Well Depth (ft bgs): a
Drilling Method: Direct
Push
Logged By: Johr, Schmitt
e
Boring/Well
0
Lithologic Description
.2
<
Construction
:3
Sample ID
-e
Details
CL
CD
E
0
04"CONCRETE co
4--5.51 SAND, fine to medium grained, trace flne gravel. trace slit, Sp
brown. moist. no odor
0.0 132-2-4
---------------------------------------------
0.1 x
5 6--w Becomes fine to coarse gralned, wet
100
Temporary
Well Screen
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample, slighUY Y8110wish.
B2-RGW x
Well Construction Information Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
MonumantTyPe: N,A Filter Pack: NA
I
Top of Caslng Elevation (ft); NA
Casing Diameter (inches):
Screen Slot Size (inches): 0010 Surface Seat: NA
Boring Abandonment: Bentonfle
Screened Interval (ft b9s); 3-8 Annular Seat: NA
Surveyed Location: X-. NA Y:NA
FARALLON CONSULTING
320 3rd Avenue 14E
Isacquoh, WA 9BO27
Client: GPA, Inc.
Project: Old Milltown Building
Location: Edmonds, WA
Farallon PN: 502-001
Logged By: John Schmitt
Log of Boring: B3
Page I of 11
Date/Tirria Started:
5/02/06 1825
Sampler Type: 4'w/poly slave
Daterrime Completed.
5102106 1900
Drive Hammer (lbs.): NA
Equipment.,
Geo Probe
Depth of Water ATD (ft bgs): NA
Drilling Company:
Cascade Drilling.
Inc Total Boring Depth (ft b9s)- a
Drilling Foreman:
Casey
Total Well Depth (ft 6gs): NA
Drilling Method:
Direct Push
CL
M
BoringNVell
Lithologic Description
>
0
<
Construction
CL
LO
U
C3
Sample ID
S!
Details
io
Q
in
0
Co
4"-5* SAND, fine to medlum grained. minor fine gravel. trace to monor SP
silt, brown, moist. no odor, roots present
75
B3-34 x
5—
V-6! Sandy SILT. brown, moist, no odor. organics and wood ash IVIL
(black)
6'-B'SAND with silt, line to medium grained. brown. moist, no odor SM 1 1751
Refusal at 8! 1
0.0 1 83-7-8 1 x
Well Construction Information
montimantType: NA Filter Pack: NA Ground Surface Elevation (ft): NA
Casing Diameter (inches): NA Top of Casing Elevation (ft); NA
Screen Slat Size (Inches). NA Surface Seal: NA Boring Abandonment: Bentonite
Screened Interval (ftbgs)-, NA Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA Y, NA
0
0
FARALLON CONSULTINa
320 3rd Avenue ME
Issaquah, WA 98027
Client: GPA, Inc.
Project: Old Milltown Building
Location: Edmonds, WA
Farallon PN: 502-001
Logged By: John Schmitt
Log of Boring: B4
Page 11 of 11
DateMme Started:
5/02/06 1900
Sampler Type: .4'w/poly sieve
DateMme Completed:
5102106 1945
Drive Hammer (lbs.): NA
Equipment'.
Geo Probe
Depth of Water ATD (ft b9s): 6
Drilling Company:
Cascade Drilling,
Inc,TotaI Boring Depth (ft bgs)- 8
Drilling Foremen:
Casey
Total Well Depth [ft bgs): 8
Drilling Method:
Direct Push
e
V
'":
t*
-;;
Boring[Well
Lithologic Description
0
>
0
0
<
Construction
4':-
6
.2
CL
0
0
U)
a
U
:3
Sample ID
0
Details
06
G
ca
:3
M
E
A A- �f%hlr�O=T=
Co
4*-3'SAND, with gravel, trace alit, brown, moist no odor Sp X.
----------------- --------------------------------
T-4 S'Secomes SAND, fine grained, minor slit, grey -brown, moist, no SP-SM
odor I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - --
4 5'-B'Becomes SAND, line to medium grained. Vace 0 1, brown. with SP
orange moilling al.6
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample, cloudy, yellow -orange.
100
02 1 84-3-4 ix
0.1 1 84-5-6
02 11 1X1 JJ I
-RGW
B4
Well Construction Information
X
Temporary
well screen
Monument Type: NA Filter Pack: NA roun U ce Va on 6
Casing Diameter (InCheS): I Top of Casing Elevation (ft): NA
Screen Slot Size (Inches): 0010 Surface Seal. NA Boring Abandonment: . Bentonite
Screened Interval (it bgs): 3-8 Annular Seal: NA Surveyed Location: X: NA Y: NA
ARALLON CONSULTING
Log of Boring: B5
320 3rd Avenue NE
lssoquah, WA 9B027
Page I of I
Client: GPA, Inc.
Date/Time Started; 5102tOS 1945
Sampler Type: 4'w/poly sleve
Project: Old Milltown Building
Daterrimo Completed, 5102/05 2030
Drive Hammer (Ibs.): NA
Location: Edmonds, WA
Equipment; Geo Probe
Depth of Water ATO (ft bgs): 5
Drilling Company: Cascade Drilling. Inc
Drilling Foreman: Casey
Total Boring Depth (ft bgs): a
Total Well Depth (ft bgs)-. a
Farallon PN: 502-001
Drilling Method: Direct Push
Logged BY: John Schmitt
cm
V
r
BoringfWall
Lithologic Description
0
C
4
Construction
8
Sample ID
Details
V)
0
ai
0-4"CONCRETE
CID
4%51 SAND. fine to medium grained, trace fine gravel. trace slit
SP
*I
100
B -34 x
---------------------------------------------
5'-V Becomes fine to coarse
135-5-6
--------------------------------- ---------- 100 Temporary
V-V Becomes wet I - I well screen
Collect reconnaissance groundwater sample. cloudy, yellowish. BS-7-8
Monument Type. NA
Casing Diameter (Inches): I
Screen Slot Size (inches): 0010
Screened Interval (ft bgs): 3-8
65-RGW x
Well Construction Information Ground Surface Elevation (ft)- NA
Filter Pack: NA Top of Casing Elevation (ft): NA
Surface Seal: NA Boring Abandonment- Bentonite
Annular Seal; NA Surveyed Location: X: NA -Y: NA
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH DISTRICT
7Sn�V WWW.SNOHD.ORG Environmental Health Division
March 20, 2013 RECEIVED
Canarino Gelato LLC MAR 2 5 2013
20221 Aurora Ave N #316 DEVELOPMENT SERVIGES CTK
Shoreline, WA 98133 . CITY OF EDMONDS
Subject: Proposed Canarino Gelato, 201 5 1h Ave S #105, Edmonds
To Whom It May Concern:
Your plans have been reviewed with the ' Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health, and with the policies
of the Snohomish Health District. With the addition of the following conditions, the plans are approved.
1 . The conditional approval of the plans for Canarino Gelato was based upon the revised plans
submitted February 27, 2013 and the menu and HACCP submitted January 30, 2013. Any changes to
the plans submitted February 27, 2013 and the menu and HACCIP submitted January 30, 2013 without
preapproval from the Health District will void this approval.
2. The Health District operating permit application process must be completed prior to opening for business.
This facility will be classified as a low risk food establishment with 13-50 seats. ,
3. The three -co ' mpartment sinks must have integral drainboards at both ends. The basins must be large enough
to fit the largest item needing to be washed.
4. An indirect waste drain (an air gap) is required for the, three -compartment sink, dipper well, and any
equipment in which food or food contact equipment is placed. Please note that a direct drain to a grease trap
is not considered an indirect drain even if the grease trap is indirectly drained.
5. A horizontal separation of at least 16 inches or a vertical partition 16 inches in height is required between
three -compartment sink item #F1 and the handwash sink item F2.
6. A horizontal separation. of at least 16 inches or a vertical partition 16 inches in height is required between mop
sink item F3 and the handwash sink item F2. This is not required if the mop sink is a low floor mount mop
sink.
7. A horizontal separation of at least 16 inches or a vertical partition 16 inches in height is required between
handwash sink item #F4 and the dipper well item #F5.
8. A horizontal separation of at least 16 inches or a vertical partition 16 inches in height is required between
handwash sink item #F4 and all food preparation areas.
9. If splashguards (equipment, partitions and/or walls) are provided on both sides of a handwash sink the
distance between the splashguards must be at least 18 inches apart (shoulder width) to allow proper access
to the handwash sink.
10. Water heaters must be of sufficient size to provide hot water to dishwasher and/or scullery sinks and at the
same time provide hot water to all handwash sinks.
11. Hot water must be available to all handwash sinks within 15 seconds. The hot water for the facility must not
be used, at any plumbing fixture, for a minimum of 6 hours prior to the preoperational inspection. This is
required so that proper testing of the 15-second time requirement for hot water availability can be completed.
12. It cannot be determined from the floor plan or information submitted whether or not a chemical dispensing
system will be installed at the mop sink. Please note that the use of screw -on type 'wye' adaptors at the mop
sink faucet for use with chemical dispensing systems is prohibited. Additionally chemical dispensers cannot
be connected to the mop sink faucet. The chemical dispenser must have a separate water connection.
3020 Rucker Avenue, Suite 104 0 Everett, WA 98201-3900 N tel: 425.339.5250 N fax: 425.339.5254
Subject: Proposed Canarino Gelato, 201 5" Ave S #105, Edmonds
March 20, 2013
Page 2
13. All food service equipment, both new and used, must be listed by the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) or
equivalent for its intended use. Used and'new refrigeration must be capable of holding food at temperature of
41 OF or below.
14. Extra wall protection is required on walls behind all sinks, including restroorn handwash sinks, and food
preparation counters and tables. A 16-inch high backsplash of plastic laminate, fiberglass -reinforced plastic or
equal is acceptable. A backsplash higher than 16 inches is required on the wall behind counter top equipment
taller than 16 inches. Wall protection behind mop sinks must cover the entire splash zone. Plastic coated
hardboard is not acceptable.
15. All floors in the kitchen, food preparation, food service, food storage, and dishwashing areas must be
surfaced with a durable, nonabsorbent, easily cleanable material. Expansion joints, seams, saw cuts and the
like in concrete floors in all areas, including customer seating areas, must be filled and sealed so as to
provide a smooth and cleanable surface.
16. The ceiling above the food preparation areas must be non -perforated, nonabsorbent, smooth and easily
cleanable.
17. Cabinet shelving must be nonabsorbent, smooth and easily cleanable. (Self stick vinyl or other type surfaces
are not acceptable)
18. All light fixtures in food preparation and storage areas must be provided with covers and shatterproof bulbs.
Hot hold unit heat lamps must be provided with shatterproof bulbs.
19. Plumbing must meet state and local codes.
20. The ventilation system shall be installed and operated to meet applicable building, mechanical, and fire
codes.
A preoperational inspection is required prior to operating permit issuance and approval to open for .
business. At the time of inspection the construction of the food service establishment must be complete and all
equipment must be in place and in proper operating condition. Incomplete construction or equipment operation
will result in a $168.00 re -inspection fee. Contact the Food Program office a minimum of one week in
advance of the desired inspection date to schedule an appointment for the preoperational inspection. The
preoperational inspection will ensure compliance with the Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health for
Food Service Sanitation.
Changes or additions to the approved plans or equipment require pre -approval from the Snohomish Health
District prior to implementation of the changes.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My office number is 425.339.5250 and my email address is
rhoppa(cDshohd.org.
WSincere[
V z
� /Health Specialist
obert A. H
op
Environment
Food Establishment Plan Review
RAH/sm
Enclosure: Food Establishment Operating Permit Application and Fee Schedule
cc: City of Edmonds Building Department
�,ellovj
P;6�0u-
TITFI
C74
U-1
Par k i,%
0 CA d 0 YAP T-C-Q4 OAS
Re9 U-e�s u s-e_ 0�
0 p 0 3.p- �o ,c d u vA to -k-kc 't,� -ru as 44 see
1,\Ciu- TV plc
VJeJ, Awl
6o or 0-�
u".e c4 Sis
OA e-Ow\
S+�p�,- -
A r �� eropov-d
to 0 6 1 4c d u r^ e
PC.,, k;vx s
cv\ s
I k
ZH
I . PLQ.,�41 0� ce-c---5')
4
Nfe:
'�&Lw,.t k c I osz�
/ k�LAd "
AuG 17 05 12:46p
Randall Bowers
(6501 212-72H7
P. e
August 17, 2005
Randall Bowers
Edmonds Pride Inc.
DBA Quznos Sub #8725
911 Carol Way
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425-248-OD42.
Business Address:
201 Sth Avenue South Ste 1
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425-776-1000
Marie Haffison
Senior Permit Coordinator
city of Edmonds, Building Divison
121 5th Avenue North - 2nd Floor
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425-771-0220 Fax: 425-771-0221
RE: Disposal Plan for Qutznos Sub (Old Milltown)
Marie,
I spoke to Steve Fisher bDday about our plan fbr garbage pickup. He has asked me to send you a letter of
intent
It is our intention to. utilize the garbage bin that is currently being used by Ken Lee from the PmvinceS
Restaurant. Ken and I have talked and have spoken to Sound Disposal to increase the pickup from 3 times
per week to 5 times per week.
If you need any hifter intommtion please let me know.
7bank you,
Randall Bowers
President Edmonds Pride
R ESU m nL
9w,
AUG 17 4
BUILDING DEPARTMENI
MY OF EDWNW
MUCROFILM
0 V
Grease Trap Sizing Worksheet
Facility Name: QUI Z. A 0 ) X
Address: —Old AifltoyjA on 14 Ave-, —Suite No.:
• A Grease Trap plumbing permit is required ($165.00 fee). Contact the Pretreatment
Technician (425-672-5755) if you have any questions and also to get signature approval on
this form.
• Dishwashers are not allowed to be connected to a Grease Trap.
Food disposers are not allowed in a fficility served by a Grease Trap and must be disabled or
removed. Solids must be screened out and placed in the solid waste container.
Fixture Capacity in Cubic
Inches
(L x W x D x no. of sinks)
Fixture Capacity
in Gallons
(Cu. In. -- 231)
Drainage Load
(75% of Total
Capacity)
Flow Rate for a
2-Minute
Drain Period
#1
/9 x /6 x /7 x Z /0, 326.c.i.
231 = 45 gal.
x.75 = .34 gal.
_-2 /7 gpm
#2
X X X c.i.
�231 = gal-
x .75 = _ gal.
2_= gpm
#3
X X X c.i.
�231 = gal-
x.75 = gal.
-2 gpM
#4
X X X c.i.
231 = gal.
x.75 = _ gal.
- 2= gpm
Grease Trap #1 - Total drainage flows from maximum of 4 fixtures
gpin
#1
X X X c.i.
231 = gal-
x .75 = gal.
-_2 gpm
#2
X X X c.i.
231 = gal-
x .75 = gal.
2=_gpm
#3
X X X c.i.
231 = gal-
x.75 = gal.
2 = _ gpm
#4
x x x c.i.
231 = _gal.
x .75 = gal.
2 = _ gpm
Grease Trap #2 - Total drainage flows from maximum of 4 fixtures
gpM
MINIMM SIZE OF GREASE TRAP(S) REQUIRED
gpm
Number of Fixtures Connected to a Grease Trap
I ( 1 )
1 2
3
1 4
Grease Trap Size (in gpm)
1_ ��qj
1 25-
35
1 50
Upsize for factors such as high volume dishwashing, high oil/grease content on menu, etc.
(For City use only below this line) - --------
Remarks: -rAe- uj"A + riAte- siAkS will te- uy�nexttd 4a Ae, qcecLse,
V
trag. TAe. _Mnikiz�e_ �;Yik wdl Agm- an air gap dre-in dawarf-re-am
j
SizeApproved: 20 gpm Approvedby: Date: —7- M -.2005
Pretreatniffit Technician
[Rev.Feb.20041
APPROVED BY PLANNING
12 ft
0
III\ IT! Elowl, Nlmmll - ME Elm Wil IN
T --- I
E C 7271,111- ILL I 3L,
PERMIT COUNTIEUR
I&
Ax
-�2
rdl
R C EIV
E'
APR 2 99
p IT CO TER
SS
ApPFOJED
CIAL
13LOC" 0 - an N U 0
0
SorRFFT F
11 E
0 0
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING DIVISION
ADVISORY REPORT AND DECISION
To: ThNWhial rd
From:
Chanda Earhart
Assistant Planner
Date: OCTOBER 22, 2001
Request approval for replacement of a projecting sign along the
boardwalk/plaza area of Old Milltown (2015 th Avenue South Suite #2).
A. Property Owner Applicant's Representative
Jerry Kamadi Carol Stedman c/o On Deck
201 5h Ave. S #2 201 5h Ave. S #2
Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 98020
B. Site Location: 22805 100th Ave. W.
C. Introduction: The applicant is proposing to replace a projecting sign along the
boardwalk/plaza area of Old Milltown (201 5h Avenue South). The new sign is similar to other
businesses along the "boardwalk" and will coincide with the existing building design theme.
D. Staff Analysis:
1. Material: The sign is made of wood particle board.
2. Lighting: The sign will continue to have no illumination as they are now.
3. Colors: The sign will be painted white with small navy blue stenciled letters. The lower
center of the sign face will show a thumbnail stencil of a small sailboat.
4. Sign Location: The proposed sign is for the replacement of a projecting sign at Suite #2.
5. Sign Area and Sign Height:
Old Milltown
2015 1h Ave. S #2
Sign Area
Pennitted
Sign Area
Proposed
Sign Height
Permitted
Sign Height
Proposed
Wall Mounted Signs
18 ft.
5.25 sq. ft.
14 ft.
8 ft. 10 1/2inches
0 6 ADB-2001-155
E. Summary & Decision: The replacement sign easily complies with the allowed sign area for a
building of this size. The new sign is similar to other businesses along the "boardwalk" and will
coincide with the existing building design theme. Based on the above findings, your request for
design approval is considered complete and has been administratively approved and granted a waiver
from formal Architectural Design Board approval.
No Architectural Design Board hearing will be required. The design is approved as submitted on your
application received October 2, 200 1.
You will need to have your building permit approved before you install the signs.
F. Attachments:
1. Proposed Signage & Elevations.
w4l,
17 Y
ILI
. . . . . . . . . . .
-4
Ail
A z,-
Upo
..... ..... ....
7%
LURW'o
. J.
Yj
?,i r
12rmwnnlc mum
as �Mmmmm Em
. . . . . . . .....
Vt:
4A
ill i f:
picko
MILLTOWN
0 c T 17
STREET -'. "FILE BUILDING QEPT..
0 0
Milltown Nails & Skincare Outside Signage
Existing Wooden Structure
f f
A.- SIGN
(z
9
LL-
2 MILLTOWN: 2"
0
4- NAILS & SKINCARE: 4.25"
C/)
20" X 36" 3/4" Thick
2 Sided MDO Plywood Sign
Painted Back W/ Vinyl Letters
0
- 0
0
1AL11 -S A
m
it
2c /\/A L
j- 42�-)
Z- 61
LL TO WN
SKIN-C
ARE
--�j<-- �L-y �, /-�
,�, S, A
CV-14
q
��IiTY OF EDMONDS
RjJ1,DING DEPARTMENT
L
6125_�Ws
AD[jPES&;&:5—lt6loE)/Jl57---s
OVAINER 16W
APPROVED DATE:
BLDG. OFFICIAL 02 Z
PERMIT NUMBER
"A - � - - -- - ,
STREET FILE
7]
0
�D
Lu
0
C-4 ;�;
LJTJ ZZ
M
OLD MILLTOWN PIZZA - SIGNAGE PLAN
R ifl:l i I I kyj I
.,APPROVED DATE:,
SLDG. OFFICIAL
...
MeR
mr
I
In
N raH
W
OR
"I
WINDOW
60"
35m
6"'
M filtown
Plozza
WINDOW
A�T VED BY PLANNING 04
_,., �O
STREff FILE W2-
4�_x
84"
P�
RECEIVED
MAR 14 2002
BUILDING DEPT.
SNOHOMISH
HEALTH
DISTRICT
April 3, 2001
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
30210 Rucker Avenue, Suite 104
. �-verett. WA 98201-3900
:1�.339.52,"-50 FAX: 425.339.5254
Healthv Lifest.y!es. Heaithy Commurities
Richard Andrews
201 5h Ave. S #4
Edmonds, WA 98020
Subject: Old Milltown Pizza, 2015"' Ave. S, Edmonds
Dear Mr. Andrews:
Your plans have been received; however the plans cannot be approved as submitted. The following
information is needed prior to further plan review.
1. No drainboards are indicated for the three -compartment sink. Three -compartment sinks must have
integral drainboards at each end. Because the drainboards increase the size of the three -compartment
sink, the sink, including drainboards, must be shown on the floor plan.
2. No drainboard is indicated for the food preparation sink. Food preparation sinks must have at least
one integral drainboard. Because the addition of a drainboard will increase the size of the food
preparation sink, the sink, including drainboards, must be shown on the floor plan.
3. Only 9 inches of space is shown between the food preparation sink and the three -compartment sink.
This does not provide sufficient space for proper use of the three -compartment sink and does not
provide proper splash protection between the dishwashing and food preparation area. A minimum of
16 inches of horizontal separation between the three -compartment sink and the food preparation sink
is required. This must be shown on the floor plan.
4. No indirect drains are shown on the floor plan for the food preparation sink and the pop dispenser.
Indirect drains are required.
5. Some of the equipment on the equipment list lack model numbers. Some of the equipment on the
equipment list lacks both manufacturer name and model number. A revised equipment list that
includes manufacturer names and model numbers for all food service equipment including counter
top equipment must be submitted.
6. Submit a revised floor plan, drawn to scale, showing location of all equipment, plumbing fixtures and
the like, that includes the required additional information. The scale of the drawing should be 1/4 inch
equals 1 foot.
Please note that prior to opening of the new facility, after the Health District plan review process is
completed and construction is finished, the Health District permit application process must be completed
and a preoperational inspection must be conducted.
Please contact me if you have any questions
Sincer
X -4
Rob t A. Hop a, R9SP
Environmental Health Specialist
113-96-FAW
My office number is 425.339.5250.
cc: City of Edmonds Building Department
C�
0 0 Page I of 2
Gruwell, M
From: Gruwell, Meg -0 *&�
V r)
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:30 PM ;%��
To: 'mj clapshaw' P/Z,�
Cc: Campbell, Star
Subject: RE: parking info for Tranquila's
The parking for Old Milltown Mall must be grandfathered, since the parking we would currently require for the
retail alone would be 68 spaces:
(24,854 sq. ft. - 4,448 sq. ft.) x 1 space per 300 sq. ft. = 68 spaces
The parking required for the restaurant would be 22 or 24 spaces:
4,448 x 1 space per 200 sq. ft. = 22 spaces or
(4,448 - 4000 sq. ft.) x 1 space per 100 sq. ft. + 20 spaces = 24 spaces
Since you point out that they only have 24 parking spaces, the remainder are not being required because the
use is considered grandfathered. If there is no change in use, then there is no change in parking required (per
Edmonds Community Development Code Section 17.50.01 O.B. 1).
However, since you propose to change the use of some of that space from retail (with a requirement of 1
space per 300 square feet) to restaurant (with a requirement for 1 space per 200 square feet) which requires
more parking spaces than previously were required, you fall under ECDC Section 17.50.010.13.2. This states
that "If a change of use takes place, or an addition is built, which increases the number of off-street parking
spaces normally required by this chapter by more than 10 percent but less than 100 percent, the number of
additional off-street parking spaces required by this chapter for the new use or addition shall be required to be
provided in addition to the number of spaces previously existing. ..."
Since you mentioned earlier that the space you were leasing was 506 square feet, then your parking
requirement is three spaces. This is a 50 % increase from the two spaces that would have been required for
retail. Therefore you are required to provide one off-street parking space.
You may provide this additional parking space in one of three ways: acquire the space on the site, acquire a
parking space within the BC -zoned downtown business area, or pay the in -lieu fee. If you want to try to provide
the space on the site, the Engineering Division would probably want to make sure you were not taking away
street parking to create an off-street space. They also have regulations on size and access to spaces.
Edmonds Community Development Code section 17.50.040 gives the requirements if you plan to lease a
parking space in the BC -zoned downtown business area. Edmonds Community Development Code section
17.50.070 gives the information about the in -lieu fees. For existing buildings, the fee is $3000 per parking
space.
I am going to inquire at our next staff meeting (probably Monday, April 1) if the code section 17.50.010.B.2
could be interpreted that the 10 to 100 % is for all of Old Milltown Mall, but I have been told that typically we
interpret it to mean just the individual tenant. If we decide differently, I will let you know, or feel free to call me
on Monday afternoon to check.
If you have any further questions, please call me at (425) 771-0220 on Monday, Tuesday (afternoon)
or Thursday.
----- Original Message -----
From: mj clapshaw [mailto:janerbug@hotmaii.com)
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:29 PM
To: gruwell@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Subject: parking info for Tranquila's
Hi Meg, here is the parking etc..info on Old Milltown Mall.
There is 24,854 sq. feet of rentable space, 4,448 of that is restaurant space. There are 24
3/28/2002
0 0 Page 2 of 2
parking spaces in the lot.
Please let me know as soon as possible what we need to do to get this business rolling
quickly. Thank you,
Mary Clapshaw 206-533-0285
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
3/28/2002
Page I of I
Gruwell, Meg
From: mj clapshaw Danerbug@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:29 PM
To: gruweII@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Subject: parking info for Tranquila's
Hi Meg, here is the parking etc..info on Old Milltown Mall.
There is 24,854 sq. feet of rentable space, 4,448 of that is restaurant space. There are 24 parking
spaces in the lot.
Please let me know as soon as possible what we need to do to get this business rolling quickly. Thank
you,
Mary Clapshaw 206-533-0285
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
�,Ac,-� --
4, IN-4
4-o t.
?10/ '40& 1!12
3(z
k fz'.'P+ �'
4/449
(4 11 g + 4 4 8'
2,,0 4 2,4
3/28/2002
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (425) 775-2525
CITY CLERK
C. i sq,
February 15, 2001
Mr. Del Hartman
201 5" Ave S
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Request for Public Records
Dear Mr. Hartman:
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
t4DI*
PEP
Q,Mf,
%)964r
th
This letter is in ' response to your Request for Public Records dated February 8
2001, that was received by the Fire Department. You requested copy of files
from the Fire Department regarding any complaints of oil smell and violations at
the Old Milltown Mall.
Copies of the Fire department inspection records for the Old Milltown Mall are
now available for your review. Please contact the City Clerk's Office to make
arrangements to review the records. The telephone number is (425) 775-2525.
We are located on the first floor of City Hall, 121 5 th Avenue North, Edmonds,
office hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Please note that
Monday February 1 9th , 2001 is a holiday and the offices will be closed.
As for your request for as builts, a research by,the Building Department and
Engineering Department showed no as builts on file.
I would also like to make you aware that there is a charge for copies; the first five
copies are free with a $.15 charge for each additional copy.
Yours truly,
Huda Olsen
Sr. Office Assistant
cc: Mike Smith, Senior Inspector
Jeannine Graf, Building Official
Danielle Gilbert, Engineering Tech
Incorporated August 11, 1890
.qiqtor rlfu - Hiplti,n;4n AAnAn
DATE (MWDDNY)
ACaRD 0AS_l 09/21/00
CERTIFICAS OF LIABILITY INSUR4PCkR1D PB
PRODUCER R -El VED, THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Hall -Conway -Jackson, Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
P.O. Box 75978 SEP 2 2 2000 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Seattle WA 98125 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
Phone:206-527-2444 BUILDING DER
INSURED INSURER A: Fireman'
Provinces Asian Restaurant - INSURER B: *-% V E: D
& Bar INSURER C:
201 5th Ave. S. #D INSURER D: SEP 2 Z -2 o6b
Edmonds WA 98020
I , INSURER E:
1'f%WC0Ar--MQ NVELP!YEHTAERVICES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWiTATY�IMM"d,
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFFECTIVE
DATE (MM/DD[YY)
POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE(MMI DIYY)
LIMITS
A
17
GENERAL LIABILITY
X COMMERCIALGENERAL LIABILITY
I CLAIMS MADE 7X OCCUR
TBD
09/15/00
09/15/01
EACH OCCURRENCE
s2,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire)
$100,000
MED EXP (Any one person)
$
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
s2,000,000
GENERAL AGGREGATE
s4,000,000
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
RO
POLICY 7 SECT . 71 LOC
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
s4,000,000
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
$
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
$
OTHER THAN EA ACC
AUTO ONLY: AGG
$
$
EXCESS LIABILITY
—1 OCCUR FICLAIMS MADE
DEDUCTIBLE
RETENTION $
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
AGGREGATE
$
$
$
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
I
W(; bIA
TORY I -I
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
$
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
$
E.L. DISEASE - rOLICY Ll.'.I!T
$
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEME NTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
Certificate Holder is named as Additional Insured as respects the insureds
awning.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER Y I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER: CANCF-LLATIUN
ciwo-i � SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATIOI
DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYSWRITTEN
City of Edmonds NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL
Building Division IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR
250 5th Ave. N.
Edmonds WA 98020 REPRESENTATIVES.
I I John Nagle \, )MVr� I y&U1V—J
ACORD 25-S (7/97) 1 ) /I QIWD CORPORATION 1988
1A.
Ll
U
Ul
city of e&onds 40
land use application ADS
.mot% MW
ErARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
E) COMP PLAN AMENDMENT
E) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FIL —ZON
El HOME OCCUPATION
11 FORMAL SUBDIVISION ATE REC' D
Ll SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE RRCI:l
Ll LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT -� V
Ll PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP NT HEA ATE
OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDM T z
STREET VACATION STA*\� El PB Q AD�� 0 CC
L) REZONE
D SHORELINE PERMIT 10 TAK N:
L11 VARIANCE / REASONABLE US
EXCEPTION APP D ENIED L) APPEALED
Ll OTHER
PEAL#
4�; 7
0
Applicant illn fl. 14pjw "-�-Phone
Address ,�rvl-xve- /-I C--6f70dh5
Property Address or Location 2ol S"I'lA,4065. J-0, Sd113' /3 , C-&ia^f85
Property Owner 0/-h t71(-c- -7'.O",v' Phone
Address 04-01 4JA
Agent )"�OA(Algr Phone
Address
Tax Acc # Sec. Twp. Rng-
Legal Descripti6h
Details of Project o r Proposed Use Lg;Z 72' "A 001710e 0" AJO Av0V-`
0141WS DA)
The undersigned applicant, and his/ her/ its heirs, and assigns, in consideration of the processing of the
application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all
damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or in part upon
false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/ her/ its agents or
employees.
The undersigned applicani grants his/ her/ its permission for public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to
enter the subject property for the purpose of inspection and posting attendant to this application.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/ OWNER/ AGENT
rq
gav
cy 215
*ehy I ? e-Y
0
5-0
's . '7
- AY
-).,2 / 41
Nil
L
Ll
QA
LL.
RECE.IVED LLJ
DEC 2 2 1993 LLJ
F-1 �:
PERMIT COUNTER
W
J
IL Tj
id'
0
0
ol-r., f
ae-a,4o,l,W7_
Ao Lle,
�Q c
go I -off
rL o 0 R P Lpt4
�277,E`. TeL-?4 '-Y _SlAn,�C
N' 11-001
2!2� ///,�l
c �)om
3
To, �z
15�
I
go �!pg\�mvy-
W, Y-" , , �! � MEN,
%owITY OF EDMONDS ��i
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SECTION 307
At 201 5th Avenue South, #1 Building Permit Number
Occupancy established by this certificate: I
B2
No. Units I -
Type Const. IV -HT
N/A
No. Stories
Basement
Floor Load signs in place (per Sec. 23o8 U.B.C.) — Capacity signs 36 posted (per Sec. 3302(c) U.B.C.)
Floor load and room capacity signs, when required, must remain posted at all times.
Owner of Building Old Milltown
Address
201 5th Avenue South, Edmonds
THE ZORBA'S RESTAURANT HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED AS COMPLYING WITH
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE CI TY 1991 EDITION, FOR THE
GROUP AND DIVISION OF OCCUPANCY AND THE USE FOR WHICH THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IS CLASSIFIED.
Issued this 18th day o I f March 19 93
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL By
This certificate shall be posted in a conspicuous public area and shall not be removed, mutilated or ob "ur snd shall be main-
tained in legible condition at all times. Any change of occupancy requires a new certificate.
K67'r, 7 �%_Znl
771-b,212 Oz- C��
i r, k,
0111 Pit 6 k,
Miril ,e.,e--jt2'rTie'ater
".('&ease trall
q-,omt,pet-cftjj] dicnAiasher
utl et-
lihood fan
"i i i- a rn A r- ri a
r e r i ;ie t, 1,
Vree 4 �rei .
. o Z Mft Ye er
FE9 Oi. 1992
schematic of:
ZORBA'S
20 1 5th Ave S -11 1
Edrnonds, WA
tmt�h
BUILDING46SION TELEPHONE/VISIT RECORD
DATE 7 TIME /0
PERSON G" sS�J�LL— Al, COMPANY
,rci cnunpur 4t DDn.lr7rT
FILE COMMENTS:
CALL TAKEN BY:
VISIT DATE
PROJECT
SUBJECT
FILE COMMENTS:
CITY REPRESENTATIVE:
TIME I LOCATION
WHOM/COMPANY
VIOLATIC
VIOLATION # Mr.M.
irnmniptp ta thp hP0 nf vnitr ahifitv
PROPERTY LOCATION QF COMYLAINT:
DATE OF COMPLAINT:
e-_�2n / �L115- M 16�4)25- \11�5
1---7 -.4 - �;1113
PROPERTY OWNER NAME:
PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS:
Ph.
(54,D ?7;?,IZZ-7-7;�
TENANTNAME:
TENANT ADDRESS:
Ph.
NATURE OF COMPLAINT (INFORMATION PROVIDED BY COMPLAINANT)
C!" Zillwkwl
The name of the person riling the complaint must be provided. The name of the person making the complaint cannot be
revealed unless subpoenaed by court according to Washi ton State Law. —7.
COMPLAINANT NAME: I COMPLAINANT ADDRESS:
THE FOLLOWING is FOR OMCE USE ONLY
CODE SECTIONS VIOLATED:
VIOLATION:
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
APPLICABLE PERMITS AND FILES:
ZONE DISTRICT:
ATN:
RFPORT-(FOR.WAFF IM, ONLY)
mo
,n6wlils Aoup-,koulnells
IVO 1314slvesi,
CONCLUSION:
ACTION:
I I
REPORTING OFFICIAL
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
890 jo Q� Public Works * Planning o Parks and Recreation a Engineering
loo
March 10, 1993
Mr. Thomas J. Kourkournelis
201 Fifth Avenue South, Suite #1
Edmonds, Washington 98020
RE: Zorbas Greek Restaurant
LAURA M. HALL
MAYOR
It has come to the attention of the Building Department that you have opened your place
of business without the proper City authorization including a business license. The City is
in receipt of a February 4, 1993 floor plan and two site inspections were made to attempt
to verify the equipment including a grease trap. I remember discussing your plan at the
front counter and one of the ]Issues was food preparation. It is City code to require that all
three compartment sinks be connected to a properly sized grease trap. It is also City code
to require that Type I hoods be placed over grills to properly vent grease laden air. When
seating is provided restrooms- are required and shall meet the handicap code for quardrails,
accessibility etc.
Within 10 days date of this letter please revise the floor plan on file with the City to show
the exact location and type of equipment including details to show compliance to the
handicap code. This'plan shall be reviewed by the City and once approved the City will
establish a time frame in order for you to make the'required alterations within the
restaurant for code compliance.
If there are any questions please call me at 771-0220.
Thank you,
rzew�10?�
%leannine L. Graf
Acting Building Official
. 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 *
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
1 890 - 194
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 - 5th AVE N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-3202
COMMUNITY SERVICES:
Public Works * Planning * Parks and Recreation e Engineering
December 30, 1988
Bridget Topalian
4-1-0----6th- Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington 98020
RE: Permit Application for Retaining Wall
LARRY S. NALIGHTEN
MAYOR
PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
The City of Edmonds building division has reviewed the permit
application for the proposed retaining wall. Because the wall will be
supporting a surcharge from the adjacent alley, the plans must be
professionally prepared in order to be approved by the building and
engineering departments.
The application materials have been returned to you along with a sample
plot plan and retaining wall handout. A true and accurate plot plan is
part of the City's requirement in- order to approve your proposed work.
If you have any questions contact the building division at 771-3202.
Thank you,
Hal Reeves
Building Official
* Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
0
is
CITY OF EDMONDS LARRY S. NAUGHTEN
250 5th AVE. N. * EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 - (206) 771-3202 MAYOR
COMMUNITY SERVICES PETER E. HAHN
DIRECTOR
Noveinber 12, 1985
Yankee Kitchen
7th and Dayton
EclTionds, TVM 98020
RE: Street Use Permit # 13-82
Yearly Renewal Fee
Dear Owner/Manager:
Please find attached, Section 15.00.030 of'the Edmonds Conmunity
Develogrent Code which quotes the renewal fees on Street Use Permits.
Please send a check in the amount of $10.00, payable to the City*of
Edmonds, in care of the Building Division, 250 - 5th Ave. N.,
Edmonds,'VA 98020.
This payment is for 1985 you will receive your 1986 billing November
15th, 1986.
if there are any questions, please call the Building Division at.771-
3202 ext. 257. Thank you.
einnine 1;. 'Graf
ermit- rnnrdinator
JLG/md
enc:
PUBLIC WORKS 0 PLANNING 0 PARKS AND RECREATION 0 ENGINEERING
.Ty 0
CITY of EDMONDS BUSjVS LICENSE APPLICATION
Civic Center - Edmonds, Washinipton 98
City Clerk Phone 775-25215 `EET FILE
STH
El (A) HOME OCCUPATION
4STRUCTIONS:
All items must be completed
or application will not be ac-
cepted.
Sign 'and return application
with fee. Renewals received
after February 15 must pay
penalty in addition to fee.
NEW BUSINESSES AFTER
JULY 31, 1/2 FEE.
DA*�V A4F ICENSE NO.
TYPE OF BUSINESS ANNUALFEE AFTER FEB. 15
$15.00 $ 22.50
BUSINESS WITH $ 30.00
1 TO 3 EMPLOYEES (��
E] (c) BUSINESSWITH $22.00 $ 33.00
4 TO 9 EMPLOYEES
(o) BUSINESS WITH 10 $75.00 $112.50
OR MORE EMPLOYEES
`119� JEW APPLICATION (LA)
0 RENEWAL (LB)
0, CHANGE (LC)
PLEASE MAKE ANY NECESSARY CHANGES) 0 DELETE (LD)
NAME OF FIRM
NONE)( M c 9 toryt4y
Co.
BUSINESS PHONE
NaNjr (N
NO.
OF EMPLOYEES
C,
MAILING ADDRESS
0,
47," D
N A T U R� Q�.tBI�IS 1 'ggl -7
"u 4-&-ovIR-ro5i
1�"-
uit. 5rorta
BUSINESS ADDRESS INDIVIDUAL PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION
(S) (P) FEBE:nVej
CSAME)
OWNERS NAME tHOME ADDRESS ]EDIVION DS Age66W E
11'�M 14U+CAIEoK) /Rom Er 0 EVANSraN AVE. N., WASH.
HOMEPHONE DATE OF BIRTH PLACE OF BIRTH ISOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
367-26'07 �Ivu-lqq WASA,531-cg-owsr,
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION (1) NAME& TELEPHONE
(PLEASE LIST TWO) (2) NAME & TELEPHONE
C ISIJ
WASHINGTON STATE TAX NO.0 666 —.23Y-YO-7APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 41f%& -
- DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
STAFF REVIEW: FILL IN LAND USE CODE, LIFIR NUMBERS, ZONING, ETC. CHECK APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, DATE, AND
SIGN. IF DISAPPROVAL, PLEASE COMPLETE "COMMENT" SECTION. ROUTE TO NEXT DEPARTMENT ON LIST.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE Z_ —183- LAND USE CODE ZONING CODE
41 APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE
SIGNATURE I!_
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
COMMENTS E=
BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE
[E��APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE
COMMENTS:
CAPACITY: (NO. UNITS, APTS. OFFICES, SEATS, BEDS, STUDENTS)
Building
Permit
0
Hotel/Motel
(L)
FT I I I I 1
0
111
Apt. Bldg.
Office Bldg.
(A)
(0)
Occupancy
0
Restaurant
(R)
Group
0
Hosp/Nurs Home.
(H)
0
School .
. '(S)
FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE U.F.I.R.
,,i(APPROVE 11 DISAPPROVE SIGNATURE f!! 101316
COMMENTS:
POLIC
,,F.-DEPARTMENT
DATE.C;Z_�_93 SIGNATURE
(�-�PPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE
COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
0 APPROVE 0 DISAPPROVE DATE
SIGNATURE
COMMENTS:
PLEASE RETURN TO CITY CLERK
Z
1�
U
0
U
W
Q0
0
Z
0
0
1-
CITY OF EDMONDS FILiE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. *Address or vicinity ofS,ong.vA c 1�0
Owner: 5,
Name
Mailing Address
City, I State, Zip Code
9 Contractor: 2,
Nam
1/'1 �7
Mailing Address
ity, State, Zip Code
W, t No.
issOeDate
Permit Issued To: Bn I- 1 .1'.1 nl�
Type of Work to be Done: "5 I'de-LA)a i,
Work in Connection With:
0 Sub or Plat El Single Family
D-11comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo.
0 Pavement Cut: El Yes El No
JO
State License N ber
��- WIr
Telephone Number
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, -foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering.
Call 775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job.,si't-e for insprection purposes at all times.
Signature: Date
Owner or Agent
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
d ,
C. Issued By: , .0 0 0
Time Authorized: Vold aftei .3 0 --days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee ee: 1�'so , oo
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.: .
Fund III Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X —
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
Eng. Div. December 1978
FIELD INSPECT10#10 (Fund. 111 conv to Street Dent.)
Comments:
Diagram:
Contractor called for inspection Yes NO
I
,Ajork DisaPproved By: ------ Date: Bv: Date:
Work Anioroved Date
Inspector:
EnQ. Div. December 1978
CITY OF EDMONDS Wit No. U, ;2-'10
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OCT 11198,2 Issue Date
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
Dir. of P
A. :Address or vicinity o�_C-�c tion Permit Issued To:—C ';Z. Y- ha rl/)
'M/ "=� WE , -
Owner: tele,47-e_& _15a/4-r7-te YA/Me5, e Type of Work to be Done:
Name cc jDal r
a 4 kA�A� 0 Wor1kn Connection With:
M iling Address 0 S b or Plat El Single Family
��V. 31
'7plp ��Comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo.
City, State, Zip Code e Pavement Cut: El Yes 1:1 No
e Contractor:-
N m
1j'J � e I k k' _!�;.4
M�,�'ling Address ,& State License N;u7ber
Z
< Ity, State, Zip Code Telephone Number
U
NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
14 from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
0
U Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
W
co following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
0
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Z
0
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering.
Call 775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the jo i for ins ction purposes at all times.
P2_
Signature: Date
Owner or Agent
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issued By:
Time Authorized: Vold afte D —days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee: �*'3 () , 0 0
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.:
Fund III Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X
NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
F
Eng. Div. December 1978
STREET FILE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
September 1, 1982
/Qk 4/0
VZFCEIV
' _'V
'CF
SE
Works
Dir-dic �
The regular meeting of the Architectural Design Board was called to order at 7:30 p.m.
by Chairman Warren LaFon in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center.
PRESENT ABSENT STAFF PRESENT
Warren LaFon Roger Fincher ' Hank Lewis, Associate Planner
Mike Mitchell Perry Spanfelner Jackie Parrett, Deputy City Clerk
Bob Hintz
Greg Selvidge
Doug Herman
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MR. HINTZ MOVED, SECONDED BY CHAIRMAN LaFON, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 4,
1982. MOTION CARRIED.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD COMMENTS
Mr. Herman noted that vinyl coated aluminum siding had been turned down by the ADB
for one of his clients and then it was approved for another application. He felt
this to be a good quality material and said he thought applications to use it should
be given consideration. He added that cedar looks good but has a maintenance problem.
Mr. Lewis said he would photograph buildings of both materials in the City for the
Board to study.
AGENDA
ADB-27-81 JEAN BRANAA - Final review of site, elevations, and landscaping for
restaurant at 107 Main St. (BC)
There will be a restaurant on the street floor and professional offices
(not providing on -site customer service) on the second floor. Ten
parking spaces are required, six of which will be on -site and four to
be located south of the Harbor Building on contract. North and west
elevations will be half -block, of a driftwood color. South and east
elevations will be horizontal ship -lap cedar siding, stained driftwood.
All windows will be double hung wood, painted white, and the posts and
trim will be turquoise. No permanent planting was proposed but seasonal
plantings will be provided in planter boxes beneath the windows and
there will be informal plantings on the porch area. Trash cans will
be screened below the stairway; electrical meters will be adjacent to
the rear door and must be painted to match the building; no exterior
lighting or parking lighting was proposed; no rooftop mechanical
equipment was shown but if there is any it must be screened and painted
a flat color; and height verification is necessary during the building
permit review. Elevations were displayed and discussed. Chairman
LaFon said he thought it to be a fine little building and had thought
so from the beginning. CHAIRMAN LaFON THEREFORE MOVED, SECONDED BY
MR. HINTZ, TO APPROVE ADB-27-81 AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED.
ADB-44-82 WESTGATE PRINT AND COPY - Review of signs for print and copy shop at
10016-C Edm6—nTs—Way7—BN)
The applicant was not present, so this item was moved to the end of
the agenda. The applicant did not appear, so the item was not heard.
ADB-43-82 NABITTA ANNAN - Review of sign for bakery at 10016-A Edmonds Way (BN)
The applicant was not present, so this item was moved to the end of
the agenda. The applicant did not appear, so the item was not heard.
ADB-45-82 CHRIS MOUAT AND KITCHEN MARKETING - Review of sign and flower boxes
for The Yank e Kitchen at1��Ol_5thA`Ve.—S—.---3(,BC)
STREET FILE
CITY OF EDMONDS, PU,�LIC WORKS
200 DAYTQN S-LREET
-SAW/ rwAe' EDMONDS, 14A - 98020
9 775-2525
0 ':1 -
DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR STREET USE PERMIT
Name of Applicant: ('14 c F +,-L�e ek
MailingAddress: 7mr9i. c-441666me 0 re j_.,V S 7—
Telephone Number: 45-5- "/q- Date:
�S T /,f
Description of Public Place or Portion thereof desired to be used: (exhibit may be
attached)
Type of Use desired to be made
of Public Place:_
Ulu&
If dpplicable, attach plans and specifications fo utility or tructure to be erected
and/or maintained on the Public Place:
V
'-IMMPORARY PERMIT: Unless otherwise designated herein, this permit is understood by
plicant to be wholly of a temporary nature, that it vests no permanent right whatsoever.
If the permitted use becomes dangerous or such structure shall become insecure or unsafe,
or shall not be constructed, maintained or used in accordance with the provisions of this
title, the same may be revoked and the structure and obstructions ordered removed by order
of the City Engineer. If this application is for a specified period of time, the terms
of said application is:
V
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold
the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages -or claims of any kind or descrip-
tion whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the applicant or the City
of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, includinq but not limited to the defense
of any legal proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason
of granting this permit. In addition, applicant understands that the City shall be provided
a certificate of insurance to indemnify and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from all
claims and/or property damage, naming the City of Edmonds as an also insured.
APPLIC?TION OF CHAPTER 6.40 OF THE EDMONDS CITY CODE: Applicant warrants that he has read,
h
or had the opportunity to read, Chapter 6.40 of—t-E—eEdnionds City Code, attached herewith,
and understands that all terms of that Ordinance are incorporated herein as if set forth
in full and this application and permit therefore are subject to the terms of that Chapter
of the Edmonds City Code.
"5-
h3le.6
_Z�41.r Awe kewl6wepo.
11/7/74 rev. JIZO
Applicant's Signature
J
9/1A L_
Da te
blic
City of Edmonds W ks De'pt.
APPLICATION FOR �TPVET.USE PERMIT
Approval (and Agreement, if applicable) of Abutting Property Owners:
Signature Printed Name Address Date
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE (To be completed by Issuing Agency)
City Council,�p roval (Attach Minute Entry):
0yq I
Perthit Fee:.,. 0 Annual Fee: due January 1, 19.
Amenities Design Board Approval (if applicable) Attach Minute Entry:
Building Official Approval (if applicable): 0
Signature Date
Provision for Indemnity:
Terms and Provision of Performance Bond, if applicable: (Reference 6.40.050 of applicable
Ordinance)
PERMIT AUTHORIZATION BY P.W. DIRECTOR..,
gnature
PERMIT NO.- j --2) OZ
Remarks:
11/7/74 rev.
'5$"
Da te
- t7
um @gwmyg og 0�w WVM (W XfflWWV= nav t�m @Mgg Rcolow5m Wm'nm @N�Uum�g Dmion
VM gowmVg (�@� mu omn 9E?VM &'� %Vg� VM @NRM@G WGIMM W VM cpl%� wvg� 05&M
E AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY
enturion Ins. Services, Inc.
CONPANUES AFFORDONG
COVERAGES
0605 NX. 68th St.
;irkland
, Washington 98033
COMPANY
LETTER A Unigard
Mutual Insurance Co.
206-827-0383
COMPANY [M
LETTER 0
NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED
COMPANY
Kitchen Marketing Corp. dba
LETTER
Yankee Kitchen
10108 Main St.
COMPANY
LETTER
Bellevue, Washington 980(Y4
COMPANY
LETTER
This is to certify that policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time. Notwithstanding any requirement, term or condition
of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the
terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies.
Limits ofLiabil
ty in Yhousands (UU-OT-
COMPANY
LETTER
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY
EXPIRATION DATE
EACH
OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
GENERAL LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY
s300
s 300
A
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
BO 30-5325
06-28-83
PREMISES —OPERATIONS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$100
$ 100
EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE
HAZARD
UNDERGROUND HAZARD
PRODUCTS/COMPLETED
OPERATIONS HAZARD
BODILY INJURY AND
CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
$
BROAD FORM PROPERTY
COMBINED
DAMAGE
UINDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
GiPERSONAL INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
s 300
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
BODILY INJURY
$
(EACH PERSON)
$
COM REHENSIVE FORM
BODILY INJURY
(EACH ACCIDENT)
OWNED
PROPERTY DAMAGE
$
HIRED
BODILY INJURY AND
$
NON -OWNED
PROPERTY DAMAGE
COMBINED
EXCESS LIABILITY
F-1 UMBRELLA FORM
BODILY INJURY AND
$
$
PROPERTY DAMAGE
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA
COMBINED
FORM
WORKERS'COM PENSATION
STATUTORY
and
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
$ (EACH ACCIDENT)
OTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS&OCATIONSNEHICLES
Location At: 201 5th Ave S.; Edmonds, Washington It is understood and agreed that the
City of Edmonds will be named as an Additional Insured and held
harmless from all claims
and all_prop t damage as pertains to the named permit.
Canceflaftn: Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing com-
pany will =XX=xw mail 30 days written notice to the below named
certificate holder, tX�kiJX..*XX3dX-
r)bIAXW:kXXMiXX)Ck-l�:RXX:KXXXIAXOd)t)M:kxxxx,k,2dxkVxitxx*xxxx4x,mxxxxx*xx)N, by certified
mail.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER: DATE ISSUED:
Edmonds Building Division
S ptemb6r-0, 1982
505 Bell St.
Edmonds, Washington 98020
ZrHoFiiii SENTATIVE
69-7
Keith
S. Bean
ACORD 25 (1-79)
A-LcXj I e.�
OlAcic— I I
67 R-6" -
-7F
FL11
U-u
001 C'J-1 2-"M TH I P�
Y To �'j - I�D f yl o'Qp��
C-2) -
F�
Z
i�
U
0
U
0
0
0
1-
CITY OF EDMONDS mr No. ?�� -.-:4 --.1 _,,� �'
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT --'EET HLE issue Date /,9
RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. *Address or vicinity of Construction
9 Permit Issued To:00 AIC)
('('�LP?
2 nc) Aoc- .
, -/,i - -!- a t t 0
0 Owner: 0,,;A -IAk, k 1 4c:"w) i,-
4��
* Type of Work tc� be 'Done:
Name
Work* I
in Connection With:
Mailing Address
0 Sub or Plat El
Single Family
�1�i � C
vlcomml. / Ind. 0
Apt. Condo.
City, State,
Zip Code
Pavement Cut: 0
Yes E;—No
0 Contractor:
Name
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
State License Number
Telephone Number
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering.
Call 775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times.
Signature: Mh.
Date
Owner or Agent
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. Issued By:
Time Authorized: Vold after days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee: —
Security Deposii
Receipt No.:
Fund I I I Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X
NO WORK. TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng. Div. December 197'
FIELD INSPECTIN.7,wMOTES (Fund 111 T",,,Dute cony to Street Dent.
Diagram:
Contractor called for inspection Yes No
I
Nork Disapproved By: D e: Bv: Date:
Work Approved By: Date:
Inspector:
1� � Ena. Div. December 1978
i-
z
U
0
U
134
PQ
0
z
V)
CITY OF EDMONDS 10"w-
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
RIGHT - OF, - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT
A. eAddress or vicinity of Construction
0 Owner:
Name
Mailing Address
city, State, Zip Code
e Contractor: ;:,I
Name
S
Mailing Address
'-i �"' 0 75
Cityi, State, Zip Code
1W. tNo
Issu eDate
PermitIssuedTo:
9 Type of Work to be Done: SLWe-r- i't ��, rA ' '—
o Work in Connection With:
F-1 Sub or Plat 0 Single Family
��Ef Comml. / Ind. 0 Apt. Condo.
o Pavement Cut: Yes El No
State License Number
11 - ? 1 0 G -'01 6i
Telephone Number
* * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * *
B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless
from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made
against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal
proceedings including defense costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year
following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at
which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in a ccordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic
Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering.
Call 775-2525, extension 220.
I understand that this permit must be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times.
Signature: Date z—
Owner or kgen't
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES
CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
C. issued By:-:
Tim`e' �uthorlzecl: Vold after days
Special Conditions:
Ammendments:
Permit Fee��'--'
Security Deposit:
Receipt No.:
Fund I I I Fee:
Street Cut Dimensions
X
I
NO,NQ, RK. TO BEGIN PRIOR -TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng. Div. December 1978
FIELD INSPECTIOINNOTES (Fund 111 20oute cony to Street Dept.
rnmmanhw-
Diagram:
Contractor called for inspection Yes No
Work Disapproved By: Date: Bv: Date:
Work Approved By: Date: Inilli7g
Inspector:
Ena. Div. December 1978
STREE-T FILEAO
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 (206) 775-2525
September 4, 1981
Old Milltown Food & Beverage Emporium
201 Fifth Avenue South
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Dear Sirs:
HARVE H. HARRISON
MAYOR
The City of Edmonds Public Works Department, Sewer Division,
has informed this office that the kitchen in the above
establishment is not equipped with a grease interceptor, as
required by the Uniform Plumbing Code and City policy.
Lack of an interceptor on kitchen waste lines is imposing
maintenance problems on the sanitary sewer serving the
building.
Please take action within the next thirty (30) days to
provide an interceptor in accordance with code requirements.
Very truly yours,
JOHN B. MITCHELL
Acting Public Works Director
Enclosure (2)
CC: Building Division
j..
__16pi 6A(M 14X
C TY OF EDMONDS
APPLICATION
to the
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
DATE FILE # A_P8-ej�
SITE PLAN
BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS
LANDSCAPE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA -Receipt #
SIGN EXHIBITS (3)
PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER:
HEARING DATE ) 0()
OWNER Grearter Seattle Investment
OWNM/REPRESENTATIVEKinderfather Chaffos'Dunn PS, INC PHONE 775-9396
ADDRESS 201 5th Ave. S. Edmonds Wash. ZIP CODE 98020
CONTACT PERSON Dan Ganfield PHONE 775-9396
ADDRESS 201 5th Ave. S. Edmonds
ZIP CODE 98020
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER same as owner's representative PHONE 775-9396
ilo�2 ./)jz44. �Me_e-f
PROPERTY ADDRESS 406 Main St. Edmonds, Wash. 98020 ZONING i3c
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONLots 7 and 8, Block B, Plat of Town of Edmonds, according to the
plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Plats, page 26, records of the Auditor of the
County of Snohomish, State of Washington.
PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
1. Building Plans — Preliminary Final x
Site Plan Landscape Plan Elevations
2. Sign Elevations X Site Plan Landscape Plan
3. Modification of previous approval
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Cbmmercial retail and office space
DESCRIPTION OF.PROPOSAL obtain ADB approval of L2) exinting signs
0
APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT N/A
ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLET ION OF WORK completed
I (we) hereby certify to the best of my (our) knowledge, that the statements and
information contained herein are,'in all respects, true and correct.
(Signature ofApplican ty
12/78
,dmm� - AMI*L--
SHT. NO. I Khderfather Chaffos Dunn PS, Inc.
JOB NO. Archtects
DATE: 10-21 -80 201 5th Awe(Xe Souttx
DRAWN' 0FiS - Edffxx� Vvost� 98020/uSA
I U06) M-9396
ig�i6N cow,:�Trz-ucrco
OF WCOO THICX CCV-)
il
FLA:F o/4' wim f�&Nq,
C)AZK BROWN 6rAP-J
PLELIP-F-, 042.4 15WWN
FLAT 'L tT7EfZlW 0
.CiOLD PANr
OLD
NATI-0-NAL
. 'BANK
'TYPICAL IA**�(OUT
ON % I I- &.
e16N NO. I LocxTev AT 4012 MAIIS 495r
TWE! ek:iN 1,5 WRrrTEN N 6CPlPrrZTA7lNG 11 TWE 1�5CANOIWAVIAN "OPO
-eol6N N012- LOCATED A7 ljo(o MAlt4 15T.
THa C-ICAW lco WRLITTE-W WITH LETTEP-1�,IG GIMILAF- TO T4AT Wwlr,�4 it
SHOW�4 A60Ve-, e5ATIW6 " TNF- TOWN e;HOPII.
SHT. NO. P1 Kinderfather Chatfos Dunn PS. Inc.
JOB NO. Archtects
DATE: 10-ILI - 80 201 5th Ave� Souh
Edmonds. Wa9vigton 98020/USA
DRAWN: VFG ZA
OCT 2 0 REUB
November 2.6, 1980
MEMO TO: Architectural Design Board
FROM: Engineering Division
SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR DECEMBER, 1980 A.D.B. MEETING
The Engineering Division has the following comments on the hearings
to come before the A.D.B.�
CONS ENT -,I -AG ENDA
I. ADB-87-80 Edmonds Chamber of Commerce - Review of gazebo at
201 5th Avenue South -(BC)
Engineering has no comment on this item.
2. ADB-15-78 - Fred Bryant - Review of changes to the exterior of
a 16 unit apartment building at 7815 218th St. S.W. (RML)
Engineering has no objection to these changes.
3. ADB-51-78 Jedco Company - Review of fence in conjun(;tion with 48
unit apartment complex on the west side of 21001, 21003,
and 21005 84th Avenue West.
Engineering has no comment on this item.
4. ADB-91-80 - City of Edmonds - Review of entrance addition for the
South Snohomish County Senior Center at 220 Railroad Ave.(CI-1)
AGENDA Engineering has no comment on this item.
5. ADB-83-80 - Mr. & Mrs. E. Wise - Review of site, elevations and land-
scaping for condominium project at 528 Pine Street. (RMH)
Assuming,that the variance required on this project is
aDproved��t the November 26th Board of Adjustment meetina,
the Engineering Division has the following requirements:'
0
4-IS-60
CROSS -IMM AND -BEVIEVv t%0,3rWNMENT's;'�-
INITIATIN4- ACTION AV'3-7Z-bo DATE-9-12-8cp PACuE
OWNER NAME: —
ADD RE 5s. '10/ "r?4C, "4w
, 'r
APPLICANT NAME,: Aoel &�LeLeelqIeWed*l
ADDRESS_L-_A,p/ 4->"'
SITE LOCAT16N OR APPRES.S:
p- o N E. 73c-
LlE6.AL DESCRIPTION:
ATTACHED E-1
F I LE Ad. :E RG R. Ft F-suL-r s PILED IN
n
og. Q FOR � I -" r , � -a
D I V. z NEXT
tu a t4
.TYPE OF MEETING Z t MEETiN6 a V) U) Ul
P. E c I 1). 47-
ACTION U -4 PATE 0 DATE U,
to pol
DATE tu k z
t sEr
I" lu cc IV I a
y—
—x
X
X
A 1-o
C/
21
z
e-::i
C/
REVIEWS
PATE TO
NOTE S
DATE By
OWN.
--&SSI!Rmnv
DATE ITO
NOTH.9
PATE By
PREVIOUS 141STORY
SITE REVIEW VISIT
UTILITIES
PRAINA41t/roro4sitAPHY
srREErs /SIDEWALKS
TRAFFICIPARKINd
ZONIM43 CODE
FIRE MAP.SHAL.
_4
0
DATE FILE #
SITE PLAN
CITY OF EDMONDS
BUILDING PLANS (3): ELEVATIONS
APPLICATION
LANDSCAPE PLAN
to the
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA — Receipt #
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
SIGN EXHIBITS (3)
PLAN MODIFICATIONS TO FILE NUMBER:
HEARING DATE- lk&�)
IMOtER/REPRESENTATIVE 03 F/f L F AM IF rz� PHONE �113
ADDRESS 4ve-. 6007-1-1
F-121"Olivs -ZIP CODE- 92070
CONTACT PERSON
PHONE
ADDRESS
ZIP CODE
ARCHITECT MN39ZGNM 5141nr_
PHONE
PROPERTY ADDRESS All e, -
91 ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION �5 te Pe_44.) 7-177- e-
SHE- 6 7-
PLANS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
1. Building Plans — Preliminary
Final —
Site Plan Landscape Plan Elevationf ZX
2. Sign Elevations X Site Plan
Landscape Plan
3. Modification of previous approval
EXISTING.USE OF PROPERTY R E_ MA-V&40yr
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL r2qsr1A),:5
APPROXIMATE DATE WORK WILL BEGIN ON PROJECT
ESTIMATED TIME FOR COMPLETION OF WORK Jd
124 r- 5
I (we) hereby certify to the best 6f my,(our) knowledge, that the statements and
information contained herein are, in all respects, true and correct.
(_S:[gnat_u_r'�: �o Applicant
12/78 SEP 9 REC'O
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBL* VOKS DEPARTMENTj ENGINEIqN*IVI SION � 163-66,002
APPLICATION FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSIRUCTION'PERMIT
THIS PERMIT MUST BE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE FOR INSPECTION'PURPOSES
Applicant to Complete Parts A and B
A. Permit to be issued to: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
For Work at:(address or vicinity) 201 5 AVENUE SOUTH
Type of Work to be done: INSTALL NEW SERVICE
(attach drawing when applicable)
Time Required -- Start:
Owner: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Name
-P-0- BOX 1869
Mailing Address
. 'SEATTLE WASH. 98111
City State Zip
Contractor:
Name
Mailing Address
w.ry
State Zip
Finish:Approx. 90 Days from Date
Below
MA 2-6767 Ext. 256
Telephone Number
State License Number
Telephone Number
B. INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees
to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages,.or claims of any
kind or description whatsoever, ioreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against
the applicant or the City'of Edmonds, or any of its departments or employees,
including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense
costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit.
Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and
materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance
of the restoration by the Engineering Division.
Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until
the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be
processed for issuance to the applicant.
Work is subject to inspection and restoration in accordance with City'Code. A
notice is requiredc:lfor inspecti.on.by Engineering. Call 775-2525, ext. 220.
-1 understand that this permit must be available at the J6b sie�,for',Jnspection
purposes at all times.
EDMONDS PERMIT Signature,,'j� Dec. 18. 1978'
*� O��
I TO BE COMPLETED BY ISSUING&AGENCY:
Date Issued:-2-?,
Security Bond:.
Time Authorized:
L -
10-771v (Revised)
Permit No.: —F e e
. C/414-�-57 -
APPROVED
A, Da t e
. It i �4