Loading...
20331 83RD AVE W (2).PDFiiiiiiiiiiii 7745 20331 83RD AVE W ADDRESS: TAX ACCOUNTfPARCEL NUMBER:- CX-) 4 S 1 0 11 BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): I q:]q - 0,-4 yg COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: CRITICAL AREAS: DETERMINATION: 0 Conditional Waiver tudy Required r] Waiver tg&09�� 0S rfTrll� m 1, 12103 91TIF&MR a MNU.STd P-Amyrm HFUR AM DRAINAGE PLAN DATED: PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED FOR: PERMITS (OTHER):— z2�-Q(p� acao PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: SCALED PLOT PLAN DATED: C) I ho 1 10(, SEWER LID FEE $: LID #: (121 SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT:- — BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED: SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: -.bA. s p GEOTECH REPORT DATED: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: FOR: WATER METER TAP CARD DATED: la -)9-lq LATEMP\DS'Ps\Fomis\Street File Checklist.doe #P20 Critical Areas Checklist CA File No: e Information (soils/ topography/ hydrology/ vegetation) 1. Site Address/ Location: 13�� ;�M A.� e- tZ, _.Zvz�?�L 1, - FAwtMA 2. Property Tax Account Number: C)0Lf_�;12_t)000H01?) 3. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): 4. Is this site currently developed? -,Yyes; no. If yes; how is site developed? __EMS" 5:-,tnCJU Awy-h, 5. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply. >'�� Flat: less than 5-feet elevation cha-nge over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 66-feet). Hilly: slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 30% (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of 33 to 66-feet). Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site (a vertical rise of 10-feet over a horizontal distance of less than 33-feet). Other (please describe): 6. Site contains areas of year-round standing water: ; Approx. Depth: Site contains areas of seasonal standing water: ;Approx. Depth: _ What season(s) of the year? 8. Site is in the floodway tj Q floodplain t-jo of a water course'. 9. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the grounds su , rface? Flows are year-round? C�j C) Flows are seasonal? tj Q (What time of year? Y 10. Site is primarily: forested _; meadow ;shrubs mixed urban landscaped (lawn, shrubs etc) 11. Obvious wetland is present on site: K) o -------------------------------------------------- ---- For City Staff Use Only 1. Plan Check Nurriber, if applicable? j3u�o-r)-Ool -or�3�, 2. Site is Zoned? KG_ 9) 1 N 3. SCS niapped soil type(s)? 404c, v-, G &iJ, I o &,,- ) <� y. ,,, I o �o o- 4. Critical Areas ­ inveritory or C.A\w.niap indicates Critical Area on site? "ZV-�:x,l k"'3uz 6.--, VN NnOV 1^3 MV-1 5. Site within designated earth subsidence landslide hazard area? 1'/ Reviewed bv: SITE DETERMINATION STUDY RETIRED Date: �9 WAIVER Critical Areas Cliecklist-doc/2.5.2009 4P20 A City of Ed Development Service Planning ion Divis' Phone: 425.771.0220 i) Fax: 425.771.0221 monds s Department The Critical Areas Checklist contained on this form is to be filled out by any person preparing a Development Permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to his/her submittal of the application to the City. The purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether any potential Critical Areas are, or may be, present on the subject property. The information needed to complete the Checklist should be easily available from observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical . areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). - L4- n-t Date Received: City Receipt #: Critical Areas File #: &LJV Critical Areas Checklist Fee:- $155.00 Date Mailed to Applicant: A property owner, or his/her authorized representative, must fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City will review the checklist, make a precursory site visit, and make a determination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development permit application. Please submit a vicinity map, along with the signed copy of this form to assist City staff in finding and locating the specific piece of property described oil this form. In addition, the applicant shall include other pertinent information (e.g. site plan, topography map, etc.) or Studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assistant staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, Including reasonable attorney's fees, arising frorn any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, lils/lier/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of illy knowledge and that I am authorized ner as listed below. NT SIGNATURE OF APPLICAMIAGE DATE Property Owner's Authorization By my signature, I certify that I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my pen-nission for the public officials and tile staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posti a d t t this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER 7 DATE I PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Owner/Appleeant.: Name Pw6-�>i '�?4�A\x-W Street Address EA M A s, w)A C[FM(,O— City State Zip Tel e phone: 4 ?-rs - (o4o Email address (optional): Applicant Representative:- hrlxyl�vr\ - mwmak NAS��—, Name - (.0z=,5,S �i� \ Street Address %Z�m uJiN CID 0 City State zip Telephone: 425 --) -1 (r- (Z(e-1 Email Address (optional): t400-6n CjAe-y-;� - 0 CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Site Location- 20331 83rd Ave W Tax Acct. Number: 00431200001103 Determination: Study Required Determination CRA-2009-0043 Applicant: Chermak Construction Owner: Andrew & Lorraine Nicholson CRITICAL AREAS RECONNAISSANCE REPORT: STUDY RFQUIRED During review and inspection of the subject site, it was found that the site contains and/or is adjacent to critical areas, including Geologically Hazardous Areas, pursuant to Chapters 23.40 and 23.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The subject property lies is just east of 83rd Ave W. The subject property itself is relatively level. On or near the eastern property line there is a short rockery where land begins to slope up sharply to the east According to the City's LIDAR data, this slope is approximately 6 1%. This qualifies the slope as an erosion hazard and portions west of the residence as a possible landslide hazard. This review applies to the entire subject parcel. Depending on the location and type of project proposed relative to the identified critical areas, certain studies and reports may be required. ALLOWED ACTIVITIES AND EXEMPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS Certain activities are allowed in or near critical area buffers as specified in ECDC 23.40.220. Similarly, certain development proposals may be exempt from Critical Areas Requirements (ECDC 23.40.230). If you have any questions about whether your proposed development qualifies as an allowed or exempt activity, please contact a Planner for more information. GENERAL CRITICAL AREAS REPORT REQUIREMENTS Critical Areas Reports identify, classify, and delineate any areas on or adjacent to the subject property that may qualify as critical areas. They also assess these areas and identify any potential impacts resulting from your specific development proposal. If a specific development proposal results in an alteration to a critical area, the critical areas report will also contain a mitigation plan. You have the option of completing the portion of the study that classifies and delineates the critical areas and waiting until you have a specific development proposal to complete the study. You may also choose to submit the entire study with your specific development application. Please review the minimum report requirements for all types of Critical Areas that are listed in ECDC 23.40.090.D. There are additional report requirements for different types of critical areas (see below). Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. There are options on how to complete a critical areas study, and there is an approved list of consultants that you may choose from. You may contact the Planning Division for more information. General Mitigation Requirements for all Critical Areas are discussed in ECDC 23.40.110 through 23.40.140. STUDY REOUIREMENT — EROSION HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to an Erosion Hazard Area. Erosion Hazard Areas include: 0 Those areas with Alderwood and Everett series sol Is on slopes of IS percent or greater. Any area with slopes of 15 percent or greater and impermeable soils interbedded with granular soils and springs or ground water seepage. Areas with significant visible evidence of ground water seepage, and which also include existing landslide deposits regardless of slope. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH EROSION HAZARD AREAS Development within an Erosion Hazard Area must meet additional criteria. 0 For erosion hazard areas with suitable slope stability, the only critical area study needed is an erosion and sediment control plan prepared in compliance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.30 ECDC as part of the construction documents. This option is at the director's discretion, per Edmonds Community Development Code section 20.80.050.G. 0 In areas where the slope stability is not suitable, projects within Erosion Hazard Areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer or other qualified professional. Note that it is important for the report to be prepared by a qualified professional as defined in the ordinance. 0 Report requirements are given in ECDC 23.80.050, and more generally in ECDC 23.40.090.D. 0 Development standards are given in ECDC 23.80.060 and 23.80.070. STUDY REOUIREMENT — LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA It appears that this property contains or is adjacent to a Landslide Hazard Area. A Landslide Hazard Area is any area with a slope of forty percent (40%) or steeper and witli a vertical relief of ten (10) or more feet (except areas composed of consolidated bedrock). 0 Landslide Hazard Areas are further defined and illustrated in ECDC 23.80.020.13. In addition to tile general requirements for Critical Areas reports referenced above, specific Critical Area report requirements for Landslide Hazard Areas are provided in ECDC 23.80.050. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS ASSOCIATED WITH LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS Development is restricted within a Landslide Hazard Area and its buffer. Projects that will intrude into these areas will require a report by a licensed Geotechnical Engineer. 0 The criteria that are applied depend on the amount that the buffer is reduced. The buffer can be reduced to a minimum of ten (10) feet (with an additional 15' building setback per ECDC 23.40.280) if a report is prepared that meets the standards listed in ECDC 23.80.050. The alteration must also meet the requirements listed in ECDC 23.80.060. In addition, proposals to reduce the buffer to less than ten (10) feet must comply with the design standards listed in ECDC 23.80.PA.3. P Name Si 12,2009 Date NOTE: Cited sections of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) can be found on the City of Edmonds website at www.ci.edmonds.wa.us. 2 1 it, P) 1 I I BY PLANNING Lt"", 13U I t."r L'I -1 q L419 > I &09c> 1-10 Ir e-4. Lill e)�& 115 HR.NOTICEREQ. DR INSPECTION Zoiie Corner Fla&j-) Set&ck Required -Act . ual Ftont - Sides fj/s ­7 Rear *er 6 4 Q Applicant shall repair/replace aff deplage to utilities or frontage improvements in City tbf f-i'Dof'. klco ZIA,. right-of-way per City standards that Is. caused -r ,,I S S -, ; " 1, or occurs. during the permitted Oroject. 0. pars-i-, 9*0110 tq-4 _1", 10�0. pt-OT f.LAf4 23-,;�q Ave W, !F")MONJ)�4 Wrl, APPROVE32 ENGINEERING Dole, S A C� RESUB AUG 05 2009 BUILDING DEPAR71WENT CITY OF EDMONDS 0 BUILT L9-lq p a.L eoqc) Roc-k ,A. -4- �2q -rtZATIOA A -7 WNER/CONTRACTOR, IS RESPONS ' IBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL AND DAMAGE Applicant shall repair/replace alwarnage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused or occurs during the permitted project. C7-VNE-P, pt-pps%�l -40VED B-P PLANNING 146 24 HR. 140TIZE REQ. Q FOR INSPECTION Zone C 31. ComerAfts Setbacks Required Actual Front 951- TZ Sidesti/5, -7 f-;l Id -1 Ftear '23 He& /?C,)- set P PIC- L TP 9_03,31 AVS W , 1E.'PM0AJ1U, r APPROVE 0 3Y ENGINEERING Data:— "OrREET FILE 01 RESUB AUG 0 5 2009 BUILDING DEPAR-UMENT cITY OF EDMONDS E RESUB AUG 0 5 2009 BUILDING DEPAR?TMENT CITY OF EDMONDS q5-1 7 Cc lKe e 14- WQ z > 0 ......... ........... . C6 0 00 2 ;3 a 9� cr L (D PD am cr so �96-�7 log ra t RECEIVED STOREET FILE q OCT 10 2006 A 9'0,9 0 Z�i-4 I". BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS t-0 pp-n-.,zz 9_C).3,31 83�p AvE VV, wp 0" 01v �i'Mll BUILDING DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATIO Par dM i N PTs NAME (OR NAME OF BUSI�ESS) zz/j/ /v �� "_ Z) '� /' )/ L*- /"�- f 'r 'ip 6 w 'MAIL-ING ADDRESS' z 0 -27 `7 ICITY ITELEPHONE NUMBER U W ADDRESS X CITY NAME Z:Z /� R C, L 0 ADDRESS U -t CITY 0 CA"S U STATE LICENSE NUMBER TELEPHONE NUMBER ,,r jV 0 _7 5? - 3 _/ S _/ ELEPHONE NUMBER :33 /1/3 ITY LI NUMBi Legal Description of Property (Show Below or Attach Four Copies) r (9 f r ?I z 0 L U v) NEW RESIDENTIAL GAS LINE NON-RESIDENTIAL SIGN FlADD DEMOLISH RETAINING ALTER EXCAVATE WALL FENCE f OR FILL (_ X _FT) REPAIR PRE -MOVE 1:1 swim INSP. POOL z NUMBER OF STORIES NUMBER OF OWELLING UNITS NATURE OF WORK TO BE DONE t U Ln 4­1 PLOT PLAN 'm hC11,111 d III, or II'.I sp.'11'c' lwil�' :I�S�iglls :111d w J �LWLTSM 'I'S ill ill ICIeSl . tz'l eCs 10 1111101111111 V, tlCI'C Ild �Illd 1101d 11M 1111C 2 tile City �)l I . IL . I:ik' 11,011 ;111� w'I oll 1,..l , , - I I . , , I t f , , , 1 1 USE FER M I T U M � E R U49? AE)DRESS LEGAL,DESCRIPTION SUBDIVISION ISHORT U68 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP EXISTING PROPOSED DEFICIENCY OF RIGHT OF WAY 'j PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED El DRA:NAGE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED ORA NAGE PLAN REQUIRED 0 U UNDERGROUND WIRING REQUIRED r CONNECTION rO SANITARY SEWER SEPTIC TANK PERMIT REQ-0 F-1 NO. ELEVATION OF PROPERTY CORNERS & FOOTINGS REQ'D SEE ENGINEERING MEMO DATED CHECKED BY METE7SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE 37 _11/_ // REMAR�S SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED ENV. REVIEW COMPLETE EXEMPT ADB NO. SHORELINE REMARKS VARIANCE OR C7____7LANNING REVIEW BY DATE YARDS—) FRONT / 1, - ; S DE S REA R1 LOT COVERAGE FIRE ZONE F CONSTRUCTIO ITY I PE 0 - N CODE 76 HEIGHT _�6 SPECIAL INSPECTOR REQUIRED D Y E S El NO JAREA OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANT LOAD PLAN CHECKED BY THIS SITE IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS. LOCAL SALES TAX SHOULD BE CODED 31.04. REMARKS PLAN CHECK FEE VALUATION FEE BUILDING PLUMBING z J D 0 - 6 DATE: IIE"'10, TO: Building Division Community Development Department FROM; Engineering Division Public Works Department SUBJECT: After review of the subject building permit application, we have the following comments: I C-D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHEacusT 67h, . C�. 7 7-S - (address) (date) Street Rig�ht-of-Way Existing REQD Z I Access Easements Existing REQD pZ,= .5-e g Utility Easement Existing_,�.��� �_�.REQD� W lot Per Subdivision e_q. :kS Plat Assessor W Site Plan Checked for Accuracy, --I Z Underground 14iring Reqd. Check Accuracy ��gal Description -1 .2-,S Z Review bv Date Existing Water Main Size 5T Water Main Required Service Line Required Hydrant Size Existing, 9 Hydrant Reqd Per Fire Code ' /4//A -Size Detector Check Meter Reqd. I Cross Connection Inspection__A! Fire Department Comments Water Meter Charge Reqd. Review by. Date Septic Tank Design Approved Date Septic Tank Permit Reqd. Permit No. Sanitary Sewer Availability Uj_Proj Drawing No.. r-> File No. I_ I rD f C,01 Side Sewer Availability 17-R=_2,_rC( Sanitary S Connection Fee Reqd. v,�cn :3: Review by Date .2-ns. Open Ditch Existing__d��....,Reqd. ;V Culvert Reqd. _,oO' Size P4 Catch Basin Reqd. -Indicate on Site Plan .0 Shoulder drainage maintain collection on swale open runoff M4� Manhole reqd._ Indicate an Sitd/plan Soil Conditions and Ground Water Field Checked Review by. /, f Date_��4& 0; 9k Revised: lv10-1977 Page, 2 Street Paving Reqd. Curb and Gutter Reqd. 46 �- Sidewalk Reqd. curb cut' for Driveway Reqd. Right-of*Way Construction Permit Reqd. Bond Reqd. for Public Improvements Street Name Sign Reqd. Other Signing Reqd. Pre Permit.site Inspection made on 0 14 H BY: SEWER L) W WATER P4 U) z STREET P4 ENGINEERING Spe cial Requirenients listed in niew to Conmmity Development Department, Building Division BY Date o All items filled in on Building Permit Application P� BY Date P4 Drawings Stanped and Notations Made P4 BY Date Approvqd by Public Works Department Revised: lv 10-1977 Side Sewer Drawing The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO - ------------------------------ NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS E LID NO... 41p-1 ....... ASMX. NO OWNER ---------- ES11 I ...... --------------- ---------- CONTRACTOR -------- 7� --------- ..... . PERMIT NO. -e-cA JOB ADDRESS ...... Z C e. I -:. -: -) E E! � ...... ............... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . .......... I ......................... BLOCK NO . .................................... PWW-0001-1 1/75 (REV. 11/78) ............................................................... .................................................................................................. NAMEOF ADDITION ....................................................................................................................... it Approved: DATE By ---------------- A Ole Zi 04 4 >4 E-1 04 z 0 0 P b W 0 rX4 eCITY OF EDMONDS PU13]�IC WORKS DEPARONT SIDE SEWER PERMIT FOR INSPECTION CALL 16 775-2525 Ext. 220 -"7 0 Permit A. - - 0458 Issue Date Mae�k, 90 PEP -MIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE 1. Address �7570nstruction 42 0 3:S 2. Property Legal Description (include all easements) SEP o 76 T, 44- 3. Single Family Residence L,,"'Multi-Family No. of Units Com ' mercial S_4� 1*rCS q 4. Owner and/or Builder 5. Contractor & License No. _j)A4*w+CA '_�P_'�VeVC _UAj_ r7-- 6. Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No L.,----"Yes (If Yes Right-of- way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before excavation). 7. Cross other private property: Yesj,,� No Easement required attach legal description and county easement number. q, :�6 READ THE FOLLOWT.NG AND SIGN Lo TL� 13 e C�p �e, Property owners must obtain a permit a. 4to Z �11 s i sewers on their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must 5. d to construct side sewers in the public right- - b. The side sewer contractor a es full e VAbial for each installation for one year. 43 "OURS C. Commercial establishment re ire m afFOrafIx - n:c (6 side sewer line. -vojj DIG d. Side sewers may not be insta led h y indhe (30") to any structure. e. Side sewer lines must be lai 15') and maximum grade of 100% (450). OMISH f. No turn in side s8wer greater (10,11 IN wed between cleanout. All 90 turns must �50 (1/8 bend) and Wye with removable cap. g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected to side sewer system. h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines through other than granular soil. i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer 'line run. j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure due to poor compaction of fill. k. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved by the City. 1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working days notice requirq�d. DATE: 40A a v - (o 9 D I c�ek'�Eify,,"thAt I -have read - "r and,shalk-6omply With the above q /Ji) )101 P_e1VVL&L4r_ f1ca-t bi PERMIT FEE: Z�%'Q-V 110 CONNECTION FEE: H4L ' i DISAPPROVED BY: Date: K--,7 By: -Date: APPROVED By: -7/ .;�C) Date:,_;;,,,/ I ------------ � I - PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE I.- 46 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERfNG STUDY PROPOSED DECK -NICHOLSON RESIDENCE 20331-83 RDAVENUE WEST EDMONDS, WA G-2899 Prepared For Mr. Andrew Nicholson 20331 - 83' Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 July 8, 2009 UZ GEO GROUP NORTHWEST, INC. 13240 NE 20th Street, Suite 10 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Phone: (425) 649-8757 &,0?ab9C733'3 STREET FILE RECEIVED JUL 13"' DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR- CITY OF EDMONDS Mr. Andrew Nicholson 20331 - 83" Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence 20331 -83 d Avenue West, Edmonds, WA Ref-. City of Edmonds, Planning Division, "Plan Review Comments - Plan Check BLD- 2009-0338" dated June 18, 2009. Dear Mr. Nicholson: We understand plans are to replace an existing deck. onthe,eest, gide,of V peddeace with a new, slightly larger deck, that will have a sealed deck surface. The propose Mill be located within the buffer and/or building setback of a steep slope critical area I classified as a landslide hazard area and erosion hazard area. The steep sloped is loc 0,-�dj acent property east of your lot. The purpose of this report is to provide an assessment of the geologic hiiii&i mciated with the steep slope, provide an evaluation of the site soils, the stability of the slope, erosion hazard, buffer recommendations, and recommendations for the infiltration of the surface water from the proposed new deck. The scope of work for this study consisted of reviewing the geologic map for the project site area, a site visit on July 1, 2009, reconnaissance of the site and adjacent slope, the drilling of a shallow hand auger boring in the vicinity of the proposed deck to evaluate the subsurface soil conditions and infiltration potential, and the review of the deck site plan. Fh". July 8, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence G-2899 Page 2 Site and Project Description The subject lot is located in a residential neighborhood on the east side of 83' Avenue West, approximately as illustrated on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1. The lot size is approximately 85 feet north/south by 95.17 feet east/west. Topographically, the subject lot is relatively level. A steep slope, approximately 18 to 24 feet tall, is located on the adjacent property east of the subject site, with the exception of the southeast corner of the subject lot which includes a portion of the slope, as illustrated on the Critical Areas Map, Plate 2, provided by the City of Edmonds. The toe of the slope is generally located near the east property line of the subject lot and the toe is retained by a small rockery. The gradient of the slope varies from about 43 percent to 70 percent based on the Critical Areas Map, Plate 2. The slope is vegetated with native vegetation, including trees and brush. The subject house is a split level home constructed around 1979 and has a footprint of about 1,250 square feet. The house is connected to the sanitary sewer. Roof downspouts discharge to 83' Avenue West and the storm drain system. The west side of the house is setback about 40 feet from the toe of the slope (east property line). The proposed deck will extend from the house 16 feet and be located 24 feet from the toe of the slope, as illustrated on the Site Plan, Plate 3. ASSESSMENT OF GEOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS Geology and Site Soils According to the area geologic map the project site is mapped as Advance Outwash (Qva). The Advance Outwash unit is described as consisting of clean, pebbly sand with increasing gravel content higher in the section. The Advance Outwash was deposited by meltwater flowing from the advancing front of the glacier during the Pleistocene Fraser glaciation period. The sand is generally dense but is not cemented. Minard, J. P., 1976, "Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington," Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF- 1541, 1:24,000. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. July 8, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence G-2899 Page 3 A shallow hand auger boring was drilled between the proposed deck and toe of the slope to evaluate the site soils. The soils encountered consisted of 6 inches of fill underlain by brown to gray, fine to medium sand with pebble gravel to the total depth of the boring (2.5 feet). The sand is very dense, based on probing, and the fine gravels are subrounded. The sand encountered is consistent with the Advance Outwash deposit described by the geologic map. Hydrology The Advance Outwash sand has a moderately high permeability rate and water readily infiltrates into the deposit. According to the geologic map the Advance Outwasb deposit extends to the southwest and is exposed along the Shell Creek drainage. No expressions of water seepage were observed on the slope. SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION The project site is not located in a known active landslide area. The dense Advance Outwash deposits are generally stable in the absence of water seepage. No groundwater seepage or springs were observed. The topography of the slope indicates that historically there has not been incising into *the slope as a result of water runoff or springs. We did not observe evidence of current or recent slope instability, such as soil tension cracks, scarps, slumps, or slides, on the slope above the site. The slope is vegetated with native vegetation including brush and fir trees. In general, the trunks of the trees are straight. It is our opinion that the slope is stable. SITE VULNERABILITY EVALUATION The slope appears to be stable and the risk is low for a deep seated slide to occur based on our site reconnaissance observations, the geology, and hydrology. We do not anticipate naturally caused slides to occur on the slope. EROSION HAzARD EVALUATION According to the Mr. Nicholson, he has not observed water on the hillside and water does not stand or puddle in the yard area at the base of the slope, even in the wet winter and spring months. Based on the geology and site conditions the hazard of water erosion is low. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. July 8, 2009 G-2899 Geotechnical Engineering Study Page 4 Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the site conditions, it is our professional opinion that the construction of the proposed deck will have no impact on the stability of the steep slope, will not increase the potential for slides, and will not increase the potential for erosion, We conclude that the proposed deck will not impact the geologic hazard area and no geological hazards will result from the construction of the proposed either on the subject site or on the adjacent properties. The new deck will be supported on a spread footing foundation consisting of column footings. We understand the grade will be lowered about 2 feet under the new deck to provide more headroom space below the deck. With the exception of installing an infiltration trench or drywell, minimal site grading is anticipated. STORM WATER INFILTRATION We understand the City of Edmonds would prefer that the storin water runoff from the proposed deck not drain out to the street and the storm drain system. The sandy site soils are conducive to infiltration and we recommend the deck ston-n water be directed to either an infiltration trench or drywell in the backyard area. We recommend the infiltration trench or drywell be located a minimum of 10 feet from the toe of the slope (base of the rockery at the toe of the slope). The perforated pipe in the infiltration trench should be installed level to allow water to be dispersed over the length of the trench. Water can be input into both ends of the trench if desired. We reconunend constructing the trench as illustrated on Plate 4 (Fig. C.2.2.A, January 2009, King County Surface Water Design Manual, Appendix Q. Based on the presence of fine to medium grained sand, the trench length should be 30 feet per 1,000 square foot of impervious surface area. We understand the proposed deck will have approximately 3 10 sf of impervious surface area and we recommend a minimum trench length of 10 feet. MINIMUM BUFFER AND BUILDING SETBACK Based on our findings and conclusions, it is our professional opinion that the non -disturbance buffer can be reduced to 10 feet from the toe of the slope for the purpose of constructing the deck and the infiltration of storm water off the deck. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. July 8, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence, G-2899 Page 5 DECK FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS It is our professional opinion that the proposed deck can be supported on a conventional spread footing foundation consisting of column footings with a minimum lateral dimension of 24 inches. Footings should be supported on the dense, undisturbed soil or on structural fill to minimize settlement. If loose soil is present, the loose soil should be compacted. If the loose soil is greater than about 12 inches thick the loose material should be removed down to dense soil and replaced with compacted fill meeting the compaction specifications for structural fill. We recommend an allowable soil bearing design pressure of 2,000 psf, including all dead and live loads, if footings are supported on dense undisturbed soil or on structural fill. The post -construction settlement is estimated to be less than V2 inch provided footings are supported as described above. A one-third increase in the above allowable bearing pressure can be used when considering short- term transitory wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads can also be resisted by friction between the foundation footing and the supporting compacted fill subgrade and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations provided the surrounding soil is compacted to a dense condition. Our recommended parameters are as follows: Passive Pressure (Lateral Resistance) = 350 pcf equivalent fluid weight Coefficient of Friction (Friction Factor) = 0.35 STRUCTURAL FILL SPECIFICATIONS Structural fill is defined as fill soil that supports foundation loads, floor stabs, patios, porches, retaining walls, sidewalks, and pavements. The sandy site soil should be useable as structural fill provided it is free of organic material. Structural fill material should be placed and compacted at or near the material's optimum moisture content and in lifts that are 10-inches thick or less. Below foundation footings, concrete slab floors, patios, walkways, or other structural elements, structural fill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the material's maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D- 15 57 (Modified Proctor). GEO Group Northwest, Inc. July 8, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence G-2899 Page 6 EROSION CONTROL AND MITIGATION RiEcomMENDATIONS The construction of the deck, excavation below the deck, terracing of the excavated soils, and excavation of the infiltration trench should cause minimal site disturbance. No mitigation measures are recommended. It is our opinion that it is not necessary to install erosion and sedimentation control measures, such as a silt fence down -gradient from the disturbance area, provided the site work is perfon-ned and completed in the dry summer months. The sandy site soils will provide infiltration and runoff control. REPORT PREPARATION The services described in this report were prepared by Mr. William Chang, P.E, senior geotechnical engineer and principal of GEO Group Northwest, and by Mr. Wade Lassey, a licenced engineering geologist. Mr. Chang has 30 years of experience as a geotechnical engineer and Mr. Lassey has been practicing 19 years as an engineering geologist. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the specific application to the subject project. The findings and recommendations stated herein are based on our field observations, our experience, and judgement. The recommendations contained herein are our professional opinion. No warranty is expressed or implied. It is understood that constructing on, below, or above a steep slope has inherent risk and the property owner assumes the risk. In the event that soil conditions vary during site work, GEO Group Northwest, Inc. should be notified and the recommendations herein re-evaluated, and where necessary, be revised. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. should be retained to review the final design plans to confirm the validity of the reconunendations contained in this report if there are significant changes to the project as described herein. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. July 8, 2009 Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Deck - Nicholson Residence Please contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, CEO Group Northwest, Inc. "IN16, MMI-AZ Wade J. Lassey Engineering Geologist kb William Chang, P.E. Principal Attachments: Plate I - Plate 2 - Plate 3 - Plate 4 - Vicinity Map ' Critical Areas Map Site Plan Infiltration Trench Detail cc: Mr. Darrin Mock, Chermak Construction, Inc. GEO Group Northwest, Inc. G-2899 Page 7 ILLUSTRATIONS GEO Group Northwest, Inc. v- AR GEO 1-5T VI 1A 1 V, 4 J i 1 1 Of I All f I �jj It D k:a Q,,�08 bSO C os—,c, - -;Ica <bS�, - 6-13h 6LIA C.2.2 FULL INFILTRATION I[-- FIGURE C.2.2.A TYPICAL TRENCH INFILTRATION SYSTEM roof drain PLAN VIEW 4" rigid or 6" flexible NTS perforated pipe .............. L ............................ ..... 17-- .................................................... infiltration trench ump w/solid lid PLARYIEW..... NTS 4" rigid or 6" flexible perforated pipe �t� �tn 17 ....... 6" ::N 9! 4:7 washed rock -314" 1 1/2" ...................... ...... ;�v A filter fabric SECTION A N min 5 0, min [I fine Mesh CB Surrip w/solid lid ce,raam 2009 Surface Water Design Manual — Appendix C 119/2009 C45 IINFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL Plate 4 NOTICE: -N * o w a r r a n t y 0 f-a-oc-u-r-a-cy The information *shown on the attached map(s) was compiled for use by the City of Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants. The city of �Edm.onds does not . warrant the accuracy of anything set for.th on these map(§-). Any person or entity -requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding the inform"at"on shown on t -map(s), including, but not limited to, th*e location of any sewer stub shown. Such sewer stubs may or may- not exist and may or may not exist at the location shown. o nor its Neither the City of Edm nds .h.a-1.1 be 11a.b.-IF-e for the e rn p-'I- o-y e e- s o -r o ff i -c e,r s *-,'--) I information given* on this map(s), nor for ation provided based any one represent upon . said map(s). Z el U 0 0 Z V) QTY OF EDMONDS I a, 4pt No. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Issue Date .11 RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERM1,0"TREET FILE A. oAddress or vic, ity o Construction P. 131 n3fd AVWhi!�-, t-1 0 Owner: Grmoral In. �Pnhonp nf thrpm N. Name PO Box 9124 Mailing Address Lynnwood, 1,1ashinqton 8036 City, State, Zip Code 0 Contractor: Same Name Mailing Address 0 Permit Issued To: Gc-nn,,-a1 T(-In-,jhnn-� of rhn P. Type of Work to be Done: P�oc_jpq qg-! ;-.1 and sc-rvicc-_ dron Work in Connection With: El Sub or Plat H Single Familly El Comml. / Ind. 1:1 Apt. Condo. Pavement Cut: El Yes No ?0 0-283439 C602 State License Number I City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 2201t',ork to be comp I oted by ft. rch 15 , 1980. I understand that this pefmit must Signature: Owne-r or Agent ble at the )ob site for inspection purposes at all times. THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By:(�_ Time Authorized: Vold after —days Special Conditions: 0 Ocz A el I / PC 0 0 11 K V Q L/ e I" k- e,41 4 ep it Ammendments: 42 IIP4!? V, Permit Fee:2cz- 'Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund 11,11 Fee: Street Cut'Dimensions X_ * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECTIO�.WES I (Fund 111 -site conv to Street T)e.7.o t , . rr%rnmnn+- a - Diagram: Contractor called for inspection_ Yes NO Work Disa.T.3proved By: Date: Bv: Date: Work ApDroved Bv: Date: k_d Inspector: Encr. Div. December 1978 7Z--)'".1- CO 7961 0 3�7 E ?r /N, E.F 2-5 - Z.-) Ly 0 re, - !Y4. TR los vl� cll� zo?i"N FORM b04u92 iRFv 1-41 ROUTINE WORIPORDER GTEP goo-09Q-9ClJNA Z. Wo CHA41GES. P F-P m 0 p -EIDMON D5 TITLE C)fZ W L F DISTFUCT 4AH6E Hf-,,�—L55 L NARRATIVE . ACCT MATER . IAL CODE �DESCRIPTION.* QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL ACT COST COST JI 5r 6w v C., i T t-4 k p GROSS ADDITIONS M6VAL MAINTENANCE 105+15 LA 026 4OM- 46 x m ScHgouLtwe f WT. START ACT 4B.TAWT SPIL LCE ACT. MAP 2D4-;T'. -AL. ZS-24-- mWowu of, DAM N0T TO SCALE,' C) CP 0 **STREET FILE June 23, 1980 MEMO TO: Jerry Satherlie/Jim Roberts FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: New Residence at 20331 83rd Ave W. In regard# to your transmittal information dated 6-17-80 on the above residence. Mr. Wickstrom, has applied for a variance of the approved plan as to underground wiring. It will be heard before the Board of Adjustment on July 16, 1980. Final approval of the building permit will be with held until all requirements are met. M I 4YV%e� Harold Reeves Building Official HR/rm p,ECEIVED JUN 2 4 1980 Works CITY OF EDMONDS kiAINFORMATIO'N SHEET' STREETFILE, 2 b N EW` ASSET NO. ADDITION ADDITION TO ASSET NO. FIRETIREMENT L % DESCRIPTION LA-J A rijil Sf? 12 L) ic- 17 L SERIAL NO. LOCATION DEPT. NO. Q () 33 F s-o A ult "PURCHASE ORDER NO. *PROJECT NUMBER to PURCHASE ORDER DATE PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 6 - 3o - COST COST AA o B.A.R.S. ACCOUNT NO. q c, 3 f-/ ESTIMATED LIFE itnp INITIATED BY DATE APPROVED BY "SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET WITH FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST *SUBMIT ASSET INFORMATION SHEET UPON CLOSE OF PROJECT ACCOUNTING ONLY F1 DEPRECIATE MONTHLY DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ANNUAL DEPRECIATION AMOUNT G.L. ENTRY INITIAL REFERENCE DATE VERIFIED BY PROCESSED BATCH NO. FILE STREET 4 August 13, 1980 MEMO TO: Planning Department FROM: Engineering Division SUBJECT: AUGUST 20, 1980 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CONTINUED AGENDA 1. V-21-80 HAROLD WICKSTROM - Variance from required underground requirement of Chapter 6.30.060 for property located at 20331 83rd Avenue West. (RS-8) No comment other than to note that the requirement was made for undergrounding at the time of subdivision and again at the time of building permit application. All other newer homes in the area have underground electric service. 2. V-22-80 NEAL & KAY JOHNSTON - Variance from required rear yard setback, access width, and reduction of square footage requirement at 21405 73rd Place West. (RML) J I Engineering Division does not object to this variance. The existing 23 feet should be adequate for an access road plus utility installation. At time of A.D.B. app- lication the site plan shall be reviewed for code confor- mance of said road plus parking layout and other site improvements. We have no comment on the other two aspects of this application. AGENDA 3.1 V-24-80 DAVE HERMANS - Variance to waive minimum lot width to length requirement and to allow fireplaces to inavade setbacks approximately two feet at 221 3rd Ave. S. (RMH) Neither of these variances shall adversley effect the previously approved parking lot/site plans. Engineering does not object to these variances. (See,ADB-114-78) DAN SMITH D 1A MEMO TO PLANNING July 9, 1980 Page 2 tjiREET FILE 4. V-21-80 HAROLD WICKSTROM - Variance from required underground requirement of Chapter-6.30,060 for property located 8 a'V20331 Av6nue West. (RS-8) 5 0 No comment other than to note that the requirement was made for undergrounding at the time of subdivision and again at the time of building permit application. All other newer homes in the area have underground electric service. CU-38-30 HOWARD D. KING - Conditional Use Permit for professional office at 196th Street S.W., between 80th and 76th Avenue West. (RML) The following comments from ADB-85-79 are still applicable. Engineering does not object to this project. A drainage plan per Ordinance No. 1924 will be required, in conjunction with Building Permit application. Underground wiring per Ordinance No. 1387 is also required. Circulation and parking layouts are satisfactory, pending modification of 11 foot section of driveway on east side of property to 22 foot per discussion with applicant. CU-40-80 RONALD WALKER_— ' Conditional Use Permit for professional office at._',_Dayton..Street. (RMH) Engineering Division does not object to the granting of this conditional use. The existing five stall parking facility backs directly on to Durbin Avenue between Main and Dayton Streets and, because of the limited traffic on Durbin, creates no problem. The lot is, however, in need of some surface repair work. Engineering recommends that that portion of the parking area currently not paved be paved and requires that the stalls be striped and wheel stops be added. If, in the future, the owner decides to access additional stalls off of the alleyway, an approval plan will be required. U 0 U 0 0 —D 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 11-F PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT E` RIGHT - O�,�- WAY CONSTRUCTION 515 A. *Address or vicinity of Construction ME 030(fl �70n- 0 Owner: Nar�Ppro)903 0. TOW &mo Mal f 0 wu= cr== City, State, Zip Code 0 Contractor: n-qp- , %�:�4-Sl -610, Z-Wk!§�o N n e(,, �fling Address M�Tsn;=\210 'Unn, 00OW'' City, State, Zip Code FWit No. Issue Date • Permit Issued To: OL60 Mygqic xnc. 2.0.Com 11�A0Q0,?JyaWu00@60 000h. 90036 • Type of Work to be Done: pava oolvuvmy • Work in Connection With: El Sub or Plat 0 Single Family 31 El Comml. / Ind. El Apt. Condo. • Pavement Cut: El Yes El No @ ,State License Number VTW �38��43 Telephone Number ** NO WORK:170 BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE ** B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed, at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this permit- must be aval,lable at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. Signature: P ate 0— Owner or Agent THIS PERM1T MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: —,f,/ Time Authorized: Vold after days Special Conditions: Ammendments: 41 00 Permit Fee:— C Security Deposit: Receipt No.: — —*'.I Fund I 11 Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 DEC 311981 MEMO TO:PUBLIC WORKS REET FILE SUSPENCE DATE FROM: BUILDING DEPT. SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY FINAL INSPECTION AT The Building Dept.. requests that the Engineering Dept. review the following items prior to final.occupancy being granted at the above address. Initial Date 1. Sanitary sewer line installed and approved Water line installed and a proved. p 3. Drainag�e stalled and approved �Irx 4.., Driveway 5. Underground wiring installed to home 6. Other 0 CROSS INDEX lu�ND WEVIEW ASS16NMEN-7—S INITIATINC4 ACTION V-2-1—ac3 DATE 61-17-80 PAGE OWNER NAMEJ HAROC—D B. A.�lCk57'A0A4 ADPRESS*- —7-'!�'7 — APPLICANT NAME: ADDRE55: SITE LOCATION OKA DDFESS'- 20331 -93)RP Ave, 4q, ZONE', LEdAL -,DESCKIVTl0N: 440r 1101, ifl-dd- dr- Rolm-Avdg AcPew�� ArrAcHtbl= P.F-suLrs FuEo: IN vi Z. w a P. ` �; i- '#Z* 0 1 V. ch NEXT (4 TYPE OF - MEETING t us Z MEET196 0 q RECT.' :Z tv A 144 ACTION ,�4 VATE, ,DATE Z 66 ff '* g $-- a DATE P-31 �. %. li to ac U a fl. � i� x ', ssr I w I-, ci 1.. 1 1 Iq I cc v 1 13 4c L ASSIG NED is ENGINEERING h0'T J R EV I E WS DATE ro I DATE BY PREVIOUS 141STORY SITE REJJP-W V(�—IT UTILI-TIES " ... . 40 PRAINA4E/roPOSRAPHY. srREEr5 ISIDIWALKS TRAMC/PARKING ZdNINC3 CODS 4-IS-90 FIRE MARSHAL GNSD —14 El DATE I TO I DATE I BY U- CITY OF EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE DATE FEE L-6- 67) RECT # -.I- 6� 33 APO'S j"-x HEARING DATE: ./%- 17 APPLICANT L2 4 rX('�. 7 ADDRESS *) S-7 CITY & ZIP PHONE 7 7 INDICATE TYPE OR DEGREE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY e, -� -3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY VARIANCE REQUESTED:- 611 i'Ll e"t"' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. USE ZONE: ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) Signature of Applicant,Owner, or Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared who, being duly sworn, on his/her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared and read the attached statements and has acknowledged to me that the recititations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 19 17, E j V E D AL 8 198o Notary Public in and for the Stateg&Wa ,,jhington, !". Works residing at DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT Please answer all questions What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to development of your property? 2. How does your property differ from other property in the same vicinity? 3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to other property or improvements in the vicinity? 4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted? Will these hardships have been caused by your own action? 0 5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance? A10 REGEVED JUL 1980 Dir. Of Public. Vicji— M CITY OF EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT' GENERAL INFORMATION The Board of Adjustment meets the third Wednesday of every month at 7:30 p.m.*in the City Council Chambers. The Board reviews all applications for variances using the conditions and criteria set forth in the City Code. All decisions of the Board are effective five days after the meeting. A Building Permit, Certificate of Occupancy, or other documents, must be obtained within one year from the effective date of the variance. Ii. SUBMITTALS - The application must be submitted three weeks in advance of the meeting, with the following attachments: A. Plot Plan showing all existing structures, proDerty lines, required -setbacks, the variance requested; indicating the north point, and drawn to scale. (see example below) B. Vicinity Sketch showing the location of the subject property, surrounding streets; indicating the north point, and drawn to scale. (see example below). EXAMPLE — VICINITY SKETCH EXAMPLE — PLOT PLAN PROPOSED VARIANCE 7 k—PROPERTY VARIANCE LINE REQUIRED PROPOSED HOUSE la ; Nt N A — Pe.. E Q U I R E D SETBACK C. Names and Addresses of the Property owners of record within 80 feet of the subject property. D. Fee - $25.00 is to be submitted with the variance III. APPEAL 7 12.16.130(C) - The action of the Board of Adjustment sE-aTT-be final and conclusive unless, within ten days from the date of action taken by the Board of Adjustment at a public hearing, the original applicant or an adverse party makes application to the Superior Court of Snohomish County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. IV. REPRESENTATIVE - You or your representative must appear at the meeting so Board can ask questions about your application. Should you or 'your representative be unable to attend the meeting, or if you wish to cancel your application, please noti- fy the Planning Division at least one day before the meeting. If you have any questions concerning this application pi11t_,f0,,e_iVE1L contact the Planning Division at 775-2525, ext. 227/2i4. Recova I L 8 1980 Public, City Oj tdnlotids , 0048Y. D&OL *ffimunity s C\IJ w 0 10 lc� if) OD Li C) 8 ST S. 4 CC) 23 15 0 _LL� 22 16 i 1�) 18 2 20 198th PL. S.W. 3 IN o 4 fro 1% 19 I— , . �4A 15 18 �CL 6 CL 114 V. IT IT 7 L 13 Lu 16 "12(l , 4 LAj w _40 MI A QF� < 16 > 6 7 14 10(5 JOA— > 02 0 7 Q) 13 14 a- 14 L 9 10 9 18 198 th 9 3j 10 11 17 24 P 2 0 12 7 .16 3 LLI 0 > 23 Li / , " . < _j 12 6 Lj 15 CL /4 113 < , I > 5 > 1__L/ )" co C) 14 13 16 0 3 12 0 7 i co Pi il I Go I 10 1,, !0 200 th ST slw 27 1 2 1 3 1 S.1 7 11�0 PFQ 02 1 01 r - I I C) 1 0 1 74 -7 20- /1 C 0L_ 1.02 2 0, ui 9 > < 0 . 'U C_ ot 02 37 c - 6 26-- C\j (57 01 5 .-3 j."6 3 co 01 ir of 0 S -r..q - mi 02 0 '0 S-3 L C7— o �2 (431 35 �j w *-----'I-- __16. -11, - (14 C)N C/ � 4 > C) 0,?- 0' 2� L SW 202nd P L. S.W. _r i7 7,, - n hIs f Z 7 plur r -7 0 06b� 0�3 L2 6 -1 17 C) n '44 -67 co 0/3 1-7 HA HA 0 0 0 ?_ 01 31 C)2 00 lk 203rd P L S.W. 01 203rd. (D I 2 ,�K 0 d PL 8 SW /� H r 03 Of 01 02 0 2 IT 709 10? 4 2 3 I 0?_ D D' P4 Sec C,,.' 0 00 RECi�=_iVED JUL 8 1980 Dir. Of Public. Wo! 95 �7 '5M C49 ...... L 12 pr ��A61?71-- Z- �- zw. T F n5;1Z ------ MEYR G & ASSOC., INC.*,-. r t34423. Highway 99 onds, WA 98020 Box 32 LYnnwo4 WA. - 98�1 t778-3101... YL m Ccll m r7 2 Steve L ................................................... .......... ............ -3 %6:, - ft 0 - u 0 2 o Q L) 0 m -1 A v �� g RF-Cw-; iV L "JUL 8 1980 WZF ED - of Pubfic C:Ity of Edmond, comrourfity Devel. Doot