20516 80TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
7135
20516 80TH AVE W
CITY OF EDMONDS
FOR INSPECTION' CALL
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Permit fie 0002
SIDE SEWER PERMIT 775-2525 Ext. 220 Issue Date
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON,JOB
7
1., Address of Construction �t��
Property Legal Description (include all, easements)
� 07- 1 & ( A) 0 r7h I I A I P IV 0/,9-rH
Single Family Residence Multi -Family No. of Units
Commercial EDMONDS
LU. Owner and/or Builder TREATMENT
Contractor & License No.
Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes Right-of-
way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before
excavation) .
7. Cross other private property: Yes No Easement required
attach legal description and county easement number.
READ THE FOLLOWING AND �,SIGN:
a. Property ownersl�must obtain a permit to install side sewers on
their property. A licehIsed side sewer contractor must be employed to
construct side sewers inlithe public' right-of-way.
1� f"PURSh
b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsiQRA8 lludlr_
installation for one year. I EFORE YO% DIA
C. Commercial establishment requires a minimum o
side sewer line. iWAY 4A
d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty inches (30")
to any structure. 0
e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade. of 2% (1.15
.and maximum grade of 100% (450). 0
f. No turn in side sgwer greater than 45 (1/8;bend) is 0 allowed
between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8
bend) and Wye with removable cap.
g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected
to side sewer system.
h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines
through other than granular soil.
i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line
and at minimum intervals of 1001 along sewer 'line run.
j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original
conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure
due to poor compaction of fill.
k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered until inspected and approved
by the City.
1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Two (2) working
days notice required. z:
DATE:. 0-1 C� 1z � �P //, 8
I certify that I have read
and shall comply With the above
.1
PERMIT FEE:
CONNECTION FEE:
44
* PERMIT
DISAPPROVED BY: Date:
B Date:
APPROVED Date:
T BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy -
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for, use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees� and Consultants.
The City of"Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set! forth on. these
map(�-). Any person or entity -req uesting a
copy should conduct an indepenclent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
..----fh-e -map(s), including, bOt not limited to,
th I e location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may!'not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Eclmb� nds nor it's
emp-i-o-yeeas o-r officers Sh"d-111 be Hable for the
information given on thils map(s), nor for
I
any one representation 'provided based
upon said map(s).
.1 Side Sewer Drawing
I he City of cam.,on-as EASEMENT N . 0 .. .... ......................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS LID NO . ............... I .....ASMf. NO* . ............
OWNER.................................................................... CONTRACTOR ... ...................................................... PERMIT NO . ......................
JOB ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO
............................... .. . ................................
tomorms
...........................................................................................................................
NAMEOF ADDITION .................................................................................
I.
PWW-0001-1 1/75 (AEV.1 1/78)
eco
Approved:
& / g�
DATE fl By
---------- ,j ..... .............. .....................
CITY OF EDMONDS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR&NT
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
1 .
Lu 2.
3
04
to
FOR INSPECTION CALL Permit N?
775-2525 Ext. 220 Issue Date
PEP -MIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE
Address of Construction ANWIEr ? 0,51L 190
Property Legal Description (include all, easements)
01 Z W 0 Qb 11A L e N 0A-rH
Single Family Residence X Multi -Family No. of Units
Commercial
Owner and/or Builder &&,12IRS& 130WJ-S
Contractor & License No. NONE
Invasion into City Right -of -Way: No Yes (If Yes Right-of-
way Construction Permit Required - Call Dial Dig (342-5344) before
excavation).
7. Cross other private property: Yes- No Easement required -
attach legal description and county easement number.
READ THE FOLLOW-j-NG AND SIGN:
a. Property owners must obtain a permit to install side sewers on
their property. A licensed side sewer contractor must be employed to
construct side sewers in the public' right-of-way.
b. The side sewer contractor assumes full reponsiQL60f14(ft�h
installation for one year I vfu lklfi,)
c. Commercial establishment requires a minimum 04ECO& W
side sewer line. 1- 800 - 56?&47q30")
d. Side sewers may not be installed closer than thirty in
to any structure. 0
e. Side sewer lines must be laid at a minimum grade, of 2% (1.15
and maximum grade of 100% (450). 0
f. No turn in side s8wer greater than 45 (1/8;bend) is 0 allowed
between cleanout. All 90 turns must be constructed of a 45 (1/8
bend) and wye with removable cap.
g. No down spouts, footing drains or floor drains can be connected
to side sewer system.
h. Pea gravel is required for bedding when installing sewer lines
through other than granular soil.
i. Cleanouts are required at 30"-60" from each plumbing exit line
and at minimum intervals of 100' along sewer line run.
j. Trenches within City right-of-way must be restored to original
conditions. Contractors shall be responsible for right-of-way failure
due to poor compaction of fill.
k.. Side sewer must be left uncovered.until inspected and approved
by the City.
1. Inspection during normal working hours only. Tw (2) wor ng
days notice required.
DATE: -q-;z 0- / q _�/
I certifl
and shall comply with the above
PERMIT FEE-.7-Z.�
CONNECTION FEE:
0
PERMIT MUST BE
DISAPPROVED BY: Date:
By: Date:
APPROVED By: Date:
ON JOB SITE
STREET FILE
to his attention after all the units were sold. Mrs. Medina said she would find it difficult
to vote for approval because of the existing problems t'hat the developer had created. Mr.
Roy said he did not see how they coul.d address the variance criteria and say this would
not be detrimental to the health and welfare of the neighborhood. MR. ROY THEN MOVED,
SECONDED BY MR. BYRD, TO DENY V-10-79 BECAUSE APPROVAL WOULD-BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH
AND WELFARE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MOTION CARRIED. 1A short recess was announced.
V-11-79 GEORGE BOWLS - Variance from -required -height for-1-accessory structures and from
required side yard setbacCat 20516 80th Ave. W. (RS-8)
Ms. Luster said the applicant had been asked to submit additional information
at the last�hearing. She showed slides of�the accessory structure under
consideration and also of an additional accessory structure between and
joined to the house and fence. She said the Staff's recommendation was the
same as previously stated, that the accessory structure should be relocated
to meet all setbacks and should meet the h�ight requirement. There had
been no Building Permit issued so there was no.'opportunity to review the
location of the building or,the height of i ' t. Because of the location on a
knoll the structure appeared to be even larger than it was. Because the
structure was under 600 sq. ft. in area a 5' rear yard setback would be
allowed, but a 7 112' side yard requirement must be met. The public
portion of the hearing was opened. The applicant stated that the trees are
larger than indicated on the drawing so when the barn is painted itwill
blend in with the setting. He said it will. have a shake roof and the
purpose of the building was for storage. He said it had been his understanding
that it would be easy to get a variance so�he had gone ahead and built it
and once ' it was started it was too late to'stop. He felt there was nothing
to be gained by moving it.2' one way and 3'. the other way,.and he said the
height was only 1' higher than the Code permitted. He had talked with ' all
of his neighbors and they had no objections. He said the complaint that
was stated to have been made was not really a complaint but was just an
inquiry as to how close to the property lini ' e the bui ' lding could be constructed.
He said his, neighbors' only request was that.noise * not be created by having
the building there. He noted that the tre� trunks in that location were
30" in diameter, substantial trees, and he'said if he could keepthe structure
there he would be willing to move it in the next year or two if there were
complaints or other reasons why he should. The public portion of the
hearing Was closed.
Mrs. Derleth asked the applicant for an explanation of the lean-to between
the house and the fence. He said it is enclosed to keep the bicycles out
of the rain and for storage. Chairman Stole reiterated the problems. in
this application. Mrs. Derleth commented that when viewed from the side
the accessory.building appeared to be above'the.height limitation and it
also is higher than the house. She felt it1could not be said that it was
"tucked in." She*said that moving it down the hill would reduce the impact
of the height of the building, but at the same time it.was a more attractive
accessory building than many you see. Mrs.,Med.ina said she had measured.
th ' e building and it is 16'6" high and has ip additional 2' gable on top.
She felt there was ample room between the.two trees to relocate it. She
said she had strong feelings about constructing a building without a permit
and then coming in for a "rubber stamp" approval. She felt the building
should be moved to meet the setbacks and reduce the height and that the
.other structure built without a permit shou)d also be removed. Mr. Leraas
said there were three variances involved, one of height and two of setbacks,
and they might possibly approve one as a minimum variance but not three.
Mr. Byrd noted that the neighborhood is o.nelof relatively new construction
and the structures are large for the size o I f the lots, so that already
makes for a dense appearance.for the neighborhood. The second accessory
structure between the house and fence bothered -him more that the building
under consideration, but he felt even that building was large for that
area. Mr. Roy did not discuss this item because he*was not present for the
previoushearing on it. MRS. MEDINA THEN MOVED THAT THE APPLICANT IN V-11-79 BE
REQUIRED TO MOVE THE BUILDING TO MEET ALL NECESSARY SETBACKS AND TO MEET
THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, A14D THAT HE ALSO BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE SIDE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page 3 - March 21, 1979
STRUCTURE BETWEEN THE HOUSE AND THE FENCE, AND THAT THE VARIANCE BE DENIED
BECAUSE IT IS NOT A MINIMUM VARIANCE NOR A HARDSHIP. On question.by Mr.
Roy to the City Attorney, Mr. Tanaka*said that since the motion was to
deny, it would be best to omit the reference to the second accessory building
and leave it to the City Staff to see that'it is removed. MRS. MEDINA
AME14DED HER MOTION TO DELETE THAT PORTION REGARDING THE STRUCTURE BETWEEN
THE HOUSE AND THE FENCE. MRS. DERLETH SECONDED THE MOTION AS AMENDED. A
ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION, WITH MRS. MEDINA, MRS. DERLETH, AND
MRS. STOLE VOTING YES, WITH MR. BYRD AND MR. LERAAS VOTING NO, AND WITH MR.
ROY ABSTAINING BECAUSE HE HAD NOT BEEN PRESENT FOR THE PREVIOUS HEARING ON
THIS ITEM. THE MOTION CARRIED..
AGENDA
NCU-3-78 JOHN.LaRUE - Nonconformin Use Permit to maintain a nonconforming
unit a-T-471 Sprague St.
Ms. Luster distributed copies of an Earnest Money Agreement executed by the
applicant at the time this property was purchased. The Agreement indicated
the property had a Building PerTnit for five units only and that income for
five units only was considered in the agreement. The structure currently
was leasing six.units, one of which was nonconforming. Ms. Luster said the
applicant had the options of acquiring sufficient property to make up the
square footage required for the sixth unit'or to reduce the number of
units t * o comply with the Code. She read aloud 12.15.180(e) of the Code,
regarding the issuance of a * Nonconforming Unit Permit. There are three.
�equirements for such a permit, and Ms. Luster indicated the applicant met
the first two but he did not meet the -third. That -states that the owner.
must have purchased the multi -family dwelling on good faith with no knowledge
of the nonconforming unit. Because the Earnest Money Agreement stated
there were only five units, he was aware that there were five legal units
and that the other unit was not a legal unit. Ms. Luster recommended
denial of the application because the applicant was aware of the nonconforming
status of one unit as indicated by the Earnest Money Agreement and the
escrow papers, the applicant could reduce the number of units to the total
allowed, and the innocent purchaser clause,in the Code does not apply in
this case. She showed a slide of the property, saying she believed the
storage area in the building was converted to an additional unit which has.
one bedroom. They are not paying utilities individually on that.unit. The
public portion.of thehearing was opened.
Chet Bennett, attorney representing the applicant, said the building was
constructed in 1967 as a five -unit structure. He submi.tted to Chairman
Stole a rental agreement on the structure from 1969. He said the two
storage units under the stairs were combined in 1969 to make one rental
unit and three owners prior to the LaRues had rented this building out as
six units. He noted that all of the information regarding this building
had been provided by the LaRues and he asked Ms. Luster if there would be a
serious environmental impact if the sixth unit were to continue. She
responded there would not. Mr. Bennett suggested that the applicants
covenant with the City to phase out the sixth unit and remove the kitchen
facilities at the conclusion of five years, giving them an opportunity to
amortize their investment. He said they would put up a bond to -that effect
and the ordinance required they would have�to pay the back utilities.- Mrs.
LaRue,stated that they were novices in negotiating for income property and
had taken the word of their real estate agent that there would not be any
problem with the extra unit and that all they would have to do was ask for
a variance and a new ordinance coming on the books would grandfather it in.
Mrs. Derleth asked her if they had inquired of the City regarding that
ordinance or a permit and they had not. This matter had come.to the attention
of the City as the result of a Fire Department inspection. The public
portion of the hearing was closed.
The applicants were asked questions regarding theunits. They stated the
rent amounts for each of the units and said five have indivi8ual-utility
meters and the sixth meter is for'.the house lights and laundry and the
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Pdge 4 - March 21, 1979
APPLICATION
V
The City of Edmonds for
SIDE SEWER PERMIT EASEMENT No - --------------------------------------------
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS D LID NO. ----- ASMT. NO. 11715' - -
-------------
OWNEP - --------- ------ ------- CONTRACTOR t-4"-NCD=lP 75aFT(
----------------------- ...................... j4*PERMIT NO. 574
JOB ADDRESS ----- b44 W- -------- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - ----------- 15- 1->- ...................... BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------
NAME OF ADDITION ....... \1VPP.=> %',/.k t ..... L-. E ------------
............................................................
Approved:
DATE... By
----------
t e
Wqb, RlLiw-
'PER AM`
Wil � M
UY W,
M ��D; TM-E
W*
A
for.. side- sewer.- in,soecti6hs! BEFORE'. covering, iitn�/ *:port foni.,,o f "..t lie, -consfiuctfon,
lnspec'tibn-� - -b . I . , - - I . i
w1i, 24 ho6rsf after -requst., NO;,Sat�..*Suw, or'iholidayr I ns
1� e proviqed' within'. nspectio
%
-RU,
F.',,CONST OTION ................... ........ ............................. ................. .......... ........
DESCRI*]�T-1_
0, N,
7
................................. I ...... ............... .................... ::.7 .................................. .........
................................................... .................................. ...............................
...............................
......................................................................................................
4, ISM
......... ................. ..!OIVNER, AND'/OWBIJI ER ......... <:: >
I,.:, I ... Afib
............. ......
6kT
CT �S�MAM-E!4,,ADD][trp
'S& AN
...........
........... ............ ........... ....................
4'i re�ail�'�and/jor-l�onnectlo*ii�;'of a side- sewer� to; the,:city_sal pit, ary, seNver� _
.................. E.� �� � I., .- . . . . _,
in* &,ordiha n
sy--dzn, i.accor6me'e-with0�Y of Eddion
w
V
-'NT-ION,'l 'F -F
The
;V% NOTE, No' f— own�rsj,df,theiproperty
S�(J,� L )YTO; TH � FbLL6.WfNG:
e May,obtain a permit tb� conitruct�tgewet'��in�tail.�ro�ekk, line..:. A 1icens�& Side Sewer C must -lie e'mplo dj to,, n' tr cf'
-s1dv.;sew r -,'In, street ;area 136�,-n cover any portion 'of gelvM&f&c * All,haw,been Afisp6cted; 'o ye ep s. u
N�o' work 416'eiiormedoin, �Jty r r
ightwq�f7way requ I rest, an.. I tivasion- of,,RJk6t--of'*&Y:Pdrmie,o'btalna�ble'.froiri the City E691nee�'s..office.
NOTELN6."!'3'�'Obtein-�f�ll�in'i6r-mation,.regELrding iO , rdinance 1-IA
6 030'.and, �Regulationsl governing.isidepscw�rs'whew yow get permjt�.'
,No�:A �,at least, 30 inches coverage,at, . property line and lZi hes
cr,-musi,,havL 6� in'
�property line', m n m m "gra e'.ofi2r%':' Nooben
sharper'.than 1/8, Nyillf be pe grad e
"tted.
�NOTK No...,�--Tieri6h'e�4iii,�str�et, �muat be, water settled'. and..surface of street.. restored, to, orlginal,'cdnditjon�, Contractors shall be:,,res�.onsibI6 1or - dub:, to impr( I >per!'
p 3vhibh",jnay. develop� within one, year of completion.
"NOTE3 -Nc�.Wl
&�t�:is;�,unlawfu.]� 16 altei`6r- do-any''othe'r woi than, Is provided for in. the perr4t,� v�ork�� :�fi� �me�W' ie,or,its: appurtenancesi except tQjn-.*
Ahe' sew
pipe'fritolthe wye.
_DISAPPROVED) ......... ............. ...... -Date 'a
;W .2 j D te::..,r... .......
7.5
,..iA,PPROY1
... . ....
JE9 .. . . ..............................
�y ---- ................
�][W ks:,,
niar ............ ................. ...........................
............... ................. ........... .................................... ........................ 0.� .......... ................. ......... .......
7 ........ ............ ............ *: ........ ........... ......................................................... ...... ........
............. ..........................................
�Bb, TH' rinit�'Cbpi �T"Be�Zfg"`d''B' r of F�Jrm Perf ormink,_�O onstrudibrf,. TRIOWTo 1�6 t Abn.
Owne
y
ques 'For'Lispe,et.
-thAtA et!side� sewer,-installatibri,conitrudted1 undenthisipermit,
................ ....... .. ...... ... hereby certify h
tracting,�Flr�;, Performing Construction);
(Owner, of.',Cdn1
S, '6d�.i,ii�a6cordan66,,'With,'ill',,g6,verning,cirdiiaiicesi�of 'th-6"'Cit�,- f- -E� �St
_An
0 irion
Dated;- this: ....................... .. t ....... .....................
7,0 f, ............................ .....
_"Chec'k',' BEFORE 'Youl,dig.'for: Witer-Q,- "Gas, 'Tclephonja�,!D; ]�j)jVer-_1E],.
'Sewer-E],. Other1:11 V-V4
APPLI ATION
The City of Edmonds for EASEMENT NO . ..... ......................................
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS F� LID NO - ------------------ ASMT. NO. ---------------
OVrNER .............. .......................... CONTRACTOR --- PERMIT NO . ....................
JOB ADDRESS ------- .......................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ------
J..( ----------- BLOCK NO . ....................................
................................................................................................... --------------------------------------------------------------
NAME OF ADDITION .... ....... �.3—,L .......................................................
Approved:
DATE............................................ By ------------------------------------------------------------