The URL can be used to link to this page

20602 86TH PL W.PDFIIIIIIIIIIII 8231 20602 86TH PL W TAX ACCOUNT/PARCEL BUILDING PERMIT (NEW STRUCTURE): COVENANTS (RECORDED) FOR: LO ( t6 .51 C/) 2- CRITICAL AREASTmadd— DETERMINATION: E] Conditional Waiver [] Study Required [] Waiver DISCRETIONARY PERMIT #'S: DRAINAGE PLAN DATED PARKING AGREEMENTS DATED: EASEMENT(S) RECORDED :6�wq- D/ PERMITS (OTHER) - PLANNING DATA CHECKLIST DATED: I SCALED PLOT PLAN DATEDJ a[LS;4- SEWER LID FEE $: LID SHORT PLAT FILE: LOT: BLOCK: SIDE SEWER AS BUILT DATED:j- �� r7 �(v SIDE SEWER PERMIT(S) #: STREET USE / ENCROACHMENT PERMIT #: WATER ME ,�ER TAP CARD DATED:- 1219< V N -<7q- "' LATEMP\DSTs\Forms\Street File Checklist.doc RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAMEINAME OF BUSINESS A (L-Ex MAILING ADDRESS f T 11 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NAME C' 1—� P, /J,*6 ADDRESS TLO C,1-fFrr,)w001::) Avif- CITY ZIP TELEPHONE S q ? 1 -2 1-)(, — -7,? NAME L# V- v S novo. ADDRESS 00 3 Cl IS 0 V11"m prVIII5. m vi CITY ZIP TELEPHONE I �*_ �, � ?xxv - LfCq -1 5!6 5, STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRA ON V, P.C. �ATE e, �.A 11 Z* 13-70 1 PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL NO. Coco) 14Y600000"70-L NEW ��RE SIDENTIAL 1.3 PLUMBING / MECH ADDITION COMMERCIAL E COMPLIANC OR 11 CHANGE OF USE REMODEL. MULTIFAMILY 1:1 SIGN 11 REPAIR GWj�bCYDS FENCE .0 ( _X-FT) DEMOLISH TANK OTHER p=r15ARAGE RETAINING WALL F RE SPRINKLER 40L CARPORT ROCKERY FIRE ALARM (TYPE OF USE, SUPINfflSS OR ACT_WM EXPLAIN: INUMBER NUMBER OF CRiTICAL OF DWELLING AR AS STORIES UNITS NUMBER DES CRIBE WORK TO BE DONE HEAT SOURCE GLA LOT SLOPE % "'ANG % PLAN CHECK NO: VESTED DATE 77-- - -------- 49-j6M7 THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLX ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT APPLICATION: 1410 DAYS PERMIT LIMM I YEAR - PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS. ASSIGNS AND SUCCESORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIF% DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER MATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIBECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITVS ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION GIVEN IS CORRECn AND THAT I AM THE OWNER. OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPUDYED IN VIOLATIO��TH R CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO 0 N:j7 WORKMEN'S TION IN SURANCE AND RCW 18.27. S1GNATUW.j&9K0R 4dtN;6 DATE SIGNED 'P.25 jjl�rj PERMIT I EXPIRES USE PERMIT ZONE NUMBER /73L- W, PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT N6. LID NO. LID FEE III PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved RW Pam* ReWirad Street Use Permit ReWd EXISTING — PROPOSED Impecdort f1equired SkIewalk RoWbred REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground W-9 reqWmd mETER SIZE LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED I YES 13 NO 13 3 REMARKS OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL/DRAINAGE z I R DATE REVIEWED BY U041__W�rtt tkill t\ml � .FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE r VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR AD" INSPECTION BOND REQD . I POSTED I 13YESOMO $ --� SEPA REVIEW SIGN AREA HEIGHT COMPLETE EXEMPT ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED, PROPOSED PI-0*0 , -_ - - , 13-5 " EXP LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (Fr.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (Fr.) ALLOWED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT REAR 3 502 2,57 /0 7-s-1-R7 /Alp tnoa z PARKING LOT AREA J.PLANNING REVI D BY D&TE REMARKS CHVKED BY TYPE OF CONSTRV ON C101io, OCCUPANT, SA" 1 — I GROUP U. SPECIAL INSPESTION AREA OCCUPANT REQUIRE %Wff�ES LOAD REMARKS PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC I 08/FINAL INSPECTION REGrD _�011f hy 7- 71 U-1,170%W01i AC VALUATION $ Description FEE Description FEE Plan Check 7A/7—State Surcharge Building Permit City Surcharge Plumbing Mechanical Grading Engr. Review Engr. Inspection 40 .00P Fire Review PIanChk.Deposft Fire Inspection Receipt # Landscapeinsp. Total Amt Due Recording Fee Receipt # CALL FOR INSPECTION 1AID5) APPLICATION APPROVAL This application Is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt Is acknowledged In space provided. OFFICIALS SIGNATURE IIATE L 7 - 7- 405 . =j 771-0220V TE I EXT 1 y '* My ATTENTION 33 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO U6E,OR OCCUPY;A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL fit�FINXL- lI4t0Et-.rldW A*S'BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFI- RIGINAL - FILE YELLOW - 14SPECkC CATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC SECTION 109 0 PINK - OWNER GOLD - ASSESSOR 04/02 PRESS HARD -YOU ARE MAKING 5 CO�ES GREEN - ACCOUNTING 0 0 PLANNING DATA DATE: SITE ADDR SS- %&+JL--Pj W PLAN CHK#:03 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REDUCED SITE PLAN PROVIDED�. �YesNo MAP PAGE: 20 CORNER'LOT: ()Les� FLAG LOT: QY�es o) ZONING: P-5-12, CRITICAL AREAS DETERMINATION #: U Study Required: 1<Waiver UConditional Waiver SEPA DETERMINATION: U Fee U Checklist UAP0 list w/ notarized form Q (Needed for 500 cubic yards of grading, Shoreline Area. site within 200 ft. of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger) t2l,empt SETBACKS: Required Setbacks: V---' Street: 2-S'_Left Side:—LOO' Right Side: 0 Rear: Actual Setbacks: #* Street��Left Side: 13- 01 Right Side:_ Rear: /067.6p Street map checked for additional setback required? (Yes No /YNA) U DETACHED STRUCTURES: L U ROCKER C U FENC /TRELLISES: C /T W WW IUD ZBWINDOWS /PROJECTING MODULATION: 0 T S/ C1 TAIRS / DECKS: PARKING: Required: —2—Actual: LOT AREA: I G7.1 FOdl LOT COVERAGF-- BUILDING HEIGHT: I — Datum Point:-S ce, sm"+ --rler�o qlo4 Ad I I/ 'ej, Datum Elevation: Maximum Allowed: 1,25/ ---_.Actual Height: 7-5� F>+-, A.D.U. CREATED?: knOV4e-- eA DIVISION: LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED: (Yes / No) 0 0 THER . o ft: /a - A.." e"p, C' Plan Review By: YL--F- NewBPP1anningDataForm.D0C -A = Lu V —KN < LU LU C14 T— co rr— drrql�7` ADO GUTTERS/DOWNSPO I I AND SPLA$ LOCKS 165 STREET FILE P-L, 150,0' 0-) 01 94' C0 MM. — j i t AND DAMAGE 24.51 AP�l R V D ASI No#D > --------- 0 GI RIE i A EASTING/A0,USE ei� F= (E):RIDGE I 't-'t J-111 I C-C �,EAF� S�TBAGK �E AOANOONEED (o I \AJ I \ \ \ \ EC�' 1 2 (o.5 ---------- ---------- T i.- (E)DRIVE Lu > LU 'u lu a-) Lu LL Z Lu I I Lu < -4 �-D 0 0- 7 PAMI Elam ORAGE'\\ S--�4 24.51 -------- -- -KN LU �- V-14 .K 13 5 Lu 0 8(0. E�rl < '150.01 51TE AT PROPOSED GARAGE 5HALL 5E PREPARED 5Y REMOVE EXITNG 5 LOOSE SOIL AND STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL 5E ADDED AS PER GEOTECH. REPORT ATTACHED,. SITE PLAN SCALE: I' = 20'-0' T NORTH 501-lfl FRONT SE OLINE David Bafle� 20(002 8(oth Place West Edmonds, WA 13002& SITE ADDRES 20602 6(oth pl. east Edmonds, WA 13a02& TAX ASSESORS NUM5ER Parcel 0 00544600000-0,W2 X f ii5 Z < RECEIVEP-U a. DEC 15 2003 >- PERMIT COUNTERQ__ Lu 1-0 4 0:4 0 4 )ATUM POINT a: a. 100 TOP OF a. URFACE TREET [DRAIN 55 \ 7 \ I Lu > Lu Cj (o Q� \-) C� z < < X Lu HEIGHT CALC A +aro'5' AVRG GRADE= ACTUAL = +101' (E) MAXIMLIM= +111.15' OT COV 2 2a'B'SF (14.5%) E�;T AREA 15,150 5F LOT SLOPE IMPERVIOUS SUEFACE (E) BLDG ROOF- OUTLINE (PRE 1371): ISE,& 5F (E) DRIVE (PRE 540 5F (E) DRIVE (POST 1131-1): IB13 -1-F (E) PORCH (PO5T 193-1-1): 254 5F PROPOSED GARAGE ROOF OUTLINE: 44(o 5F V 0 0 ZONE SETBACKS: FRON SIDE REAR OTHER HEIGH -)tTREET FILE CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWNER NAME/N4ME OF S f?"6,t UMj2:-' . MAILING ADDRESS 91 -i.r) Ln -2 RJTI- 9L liI.Jes+ kA IT f J-9- NAME 7,73--7ob -7 ADDRESS --7PHONE NUMBER cr CITY Zl� ADDRESS 0 CITY ZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER Z 0 STATE LICENSE NUMBER VPIHA71QN.0ATE- 7 -1 z �A, Legal Description of Property - include all easdments Property Tax Account Parcel No. 0 NEW rV RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING ADDITION COMMERCIAL MECHANICAL REMODEL El APT. BLDG. SIGN r" FENCE REPAIR CYDS. I— x —FT) DEMOLISH WOODSTOVE INSERT SWIM POOL HOT TUB/SPA GARAGE RETAINING WALL/ CARPORT ROCKERY RENEWAL ' dc��. NUMBER NUMBER OR�,[--'-- CRITICAL` OF DWELLING AREAS,.. STORIES. ON& I UNITS eeve iNUMBER DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE IATTACH PLOT IPLANI kd-41APP' IA)q)) werp r1l 771/ PrQ041114 — 'I -450eViliC ' j I ZONE L ,5 2& 12. JOB ADDRESS 2066 OERMIT NUMBER gr& 74- ,,� WUITE/APT # PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP. TESCP Approved 13 RW Permit Required 0 EXISTING — REQUIRED DEDICATION Street Use Permit Req'd 0 Inspection Required 0 PROPOSED Sidewalk Required 0 0 REMARKS Lu Z Z Lu ENGINEERING MEMO DATED REVIEW BY A METER SIZE BUILDING SUPPLY SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES REMARKS SIGN AREA ALLOWED PROPOSED All, SEPA REVIEW �O �PLJETiE EXEMPT 17, EXP �17,$�'� AD NO. SHORE INE I Z±" VARIANCE 0 P 11 IN G W BY VATE 111AIJ-1 —7 HEIGn+Wj0bViRAGE FF(dWf- —SIDE REAR WE —MARKS Z,lk, 4r- 1,4-� eg�rA t� 1 47 Uk J, � 5 M4 BY TYPE OF I 9AFTAIA"IAILL 1 17/ 1 SPECIAL INSPECTOR AREA OCCUPANCY OCCUPANT REQUIRED 13 YES GROUP 9-3 1 LOAD REMARKS I PROGRESS INSPECTIONS PER UBC 305 FINAL INSPECTION REQUIRED MMM VALUAT rON PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING HEAT SOURC E: GLAZING % NA PLUMBING Plan Check No. MECHANICAL This Permit covers work to be done on private property ONLY. GRADIN61FILL Any construction on the public domain (curbs, sidewolks, driveways, marquees, etc.) will require separatq permission. STATE SURCHARGE Permit Application: 180 Days Permit Limit: 1 Year - Provided Work Is Started Within 180 Days .. STORM DRAINAGE FEE "Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns and ENO. INSPECTION FEE successors in interest, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold 62 harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials m employees, and agents from any and all claims. for damages o M < whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the Issuance of this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT modify, waive or reduce any requirement of any city ordinance 0 nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance TOTAL AMOUNT DUE provision." I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application; that the 0 Information given is correct; and that I am the owner, or the duly ATTENTION authorized agent of the owner. I agree to comply with city and THIS PERMIT state laws regulating construction; and In doing the work authoriz- AUTHORIZES thereby, no person will be employed in violation of the Labor ONLY THE ,ed Code of the State of Washington relating to Workmen's Compensa- WORK NOTED tion Insurance. I NSPECTION SIGNP3 AN D DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS ATTENTION CALL FOR INSPECTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR 771-0220 )?e, =E APPLICATION APPROVAL This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy; and fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. DATE ORIGINAL — File YELLOW — Inspector PINK — Owner GOLD Assessor Z 5 0 Z A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC CHAPTER 3. ..I., 0 �TAET FILE Critical Areas Checkli Site Information Project Name: - /- 6 �J 4,--- Permit Number Site Location: (o 0.2- ia T-h - Property Tax Account Number - Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): Have you filled out a Critical Areas Cheeldist for a project on this site; before? General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? (2 1 e A r Date of most recent action: Soils / Topography 2. In the Snohomish County Soil-Sa�v�t is the mapped soil type(s)? A-W Y Y' 14 'be the general site topojeip 2-X r 3- Descn pty.Xheck all that apply. Flat less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on. site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feeL) 11illy.- slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than 300/,p ( a *verfical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on. site. Comments HydrologyfVegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water X 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water /i —Approx. Depth: 6. Site is in the floodway a 0 floodplain_of a water course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area where water flows across the groun ds surface? f? flows- areyear-round? Flows are seasonal9 8- Site is primarily: forested - meadow shrubs _;rnixed 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: 23 Q 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: P1 0 11. Cn'tical Areas inventory or map indicates any Cnitical Area on site: For. Oty Use Only 9 City of Edmond's Critical Areas Checklist 'Me Critical, Areas Checklist co* ntained on this form is to be filled out by any person Preparing a Development permit Application for the City of Edmonds prior to hisAlcr Submittal of a development permit to the City. The Purpose of the Checklist is to enable City staff to determine whether anypotential Oritical Areas are, or may be present on the s'bjcct PrOPcrtY- 110 information needed to con2pleft the Cheddist should be easily, i available fi-om observations of the site or data available at City Hall (Critical Areas inventories, maps, or soil surveys). An applicant. or his/her representative. must fill out the checHist. sign and date it, and submit it to the City. The City wiu review the ChecidiS4 xjakc a precursory site visit, and make a detelmmination of the subsequent steps necessary to complete a development Permit application - With a signed copy of this form, the applicant Should also Submit a vicinity map of the parcel With enou gh doWl that City staff can find and identify the, subject parcel(s)- In addition. the applicant is encouraged to include any other pertinent information or studies in conjunction with this Checklist to assist staff in completing their preliminary assessment of the site. I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided -are f2ctual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate colum'n below). Owner / Applicant: 'U N Title Z F) � n, Street Address 0,J 7-75 -5�2 City, 6te, ZIP Phone I z IL Signature Date Applicant Representative: Name Title Street Address City. State, ZIP Signature Phone Date CITY. OF EDMONDS 'WPOt No. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT !STREET FILE Issue Date RIGHT - OF - WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT A. *Address or v Ic' n ty of Construction 0 PermitlssuedTo: Gg�nc:,.rxn� TCzInnhnncz of tha 2OL02 06th Pl. U., E&onds Northwest Owner: f'��encral Telephone of the Type of Work to be Done: Place Aerial Cab",_ Name '41�'orthwost Work in Connection With: Mailing Address k] Sub or Plat 0 Single Family El Comml. / Ind. 11 Apt. Condo. City, State, Zip Code o Pavement Cut: 0 Yes H1 No o Contractor: SNIE �1.0. 210-282839 Name Mailing Address State License Number z c� City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number U 0. NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE B. APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN INDEMITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any injuries, damages, or claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of it's departments or employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense, costs, court costs, and attorney fees by reason of granting this permit. 0 U W Upon issuance of this permit, the contractor is responsible for workmanship and materials for a period of one year co following the final inspection and acceptance of the restoration by the Engineering Division. 0 i- z Funds held from the Security Deposit (estimated restoration fee) will be held until the final street patch is completed., at which time a debit or credit will be processed for issuance to the applicant. Work is to be inspected. Restoration to be in accordance with City Code. Traffic Control to be in accordance with Traffic Section of City Code. Street to be kept clean at all times. A 24 - hour notice is required for inspection by Engineering. Call 775-2525, extension 220. I understand that this pe.rmiemust be available at the job site for inspection purposes at all times. 2P2 Signature: ate (DI rl Owner Agc Lht/ THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT THE JOB SIT FOR INSPECTION PURPOSES CALL DIAL - DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK C. Issued By: Time Autl�orizecl: Vold after —days Special Conditions: Ammendments: Permit Fee: — Security Deposit: Receipt No.: Fund III Fee: Street Cut Dimensions X * * NO WORK TO BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE * * Eng. Div. December 1978 FIELD INSPECT10*04RS (Fund 111 -WRofe conv to Street Dent. Comments: Diagram: Contractor called for inspection Yes T ,A7ork Disapproved By: Date: Bv: Date: Work Approved By: -Date: Inspector: Encr. Div. December 1978 NOTICE: No ... w- a,-.*. a 'n. t-y ... OT The information on the attached Map(s) was compiled for use by the City Of Edrnonds� its Employees and Consultants. Th.e City of �Edm.onds does not * warrant the accuracy of anything set forth on t - hese Map(�_). Any person or entity -requesting a copy should conduct an independent inquiry regarding th8lnform-atlon shown on I tf�e -map(s)/ including, but not limited to, -h th*e lociation of any sew-er stub shown. Suc exist and may sewer stubs may or may not I or may not exist at the location shown. Neither the City of Edmoinds nor its 'h r -b-1--e for the ernpl-o-yee-s o-r office-rs -S -a-'I be IJa information given on this map(s), nor for e representation provided based any on upon . said map(s). APPLICATION T<e City of Edmonds for EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO. ASMT. NO. OWNER ... .......................................................................................... CONTRACTOR ... - .......... -------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT NO - -------------------- lz - ia,4=N-V�4 F=:,L-. **-". JOB ADDRESS ---- ------------------------------------------------------------ ............ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. .: ......... 7 ----------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------ " vm.--�4.c - If "21,� S--' Z. r-Ijaimp. .................................................................................................................................................................. NAME OF ADDITION -------------------------------------------------------- ............................................................ I DATE.... .............. By - ----- - ------------------- r . -EVMKONIDS`�` SIDE: 4PVT1Y*GF, SEWER PERMIT ER DEPARTMENT :EIRMIT *5415 a -tor,,side,-'sewer:.�inspqctic�ns� BEF0 E_ covering,,. an C 11�'J,75r2525, R orti=, �of.,the construction: VIns .,p 0 Se,,provide6 withln,�24*hourh,! after, requst. No (Skt.,,1,Sun-., or,'holiday % pecti n, will inspec�lons.y 1�4 ni ,iL-*OCA�nON-'.OIF��-CONSTRUCT]16 N' ............................ 866 Plac 2,0602 -: e We, st ......................................... ................................ ......... ....................................................... N PROi�F 14BE GMAD E S 8 RI Pine Ria MON: ................. . .......................... ............................................................... ................. ........................................................................ . .......... ............................... ........ .......... ........... ....................... ......... ............................ ...... fl[LDE ........ .... OWNER AND/OR-BU R: ....... ... JAMSON .............. ..................... ................................................. !�msa, ijolins on .................................................................. ".V ..................... ............ ................... ,:[91�_.for repair and/or connection of' a side sewer: to: the, city' J1hit6'r._y`,, sewer ity of Edmonds, ordinances., the� property may, obtain a permit, to construct sewer Inside, property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must, be, empl6y,ed%��o any poitior�%of sewer bef ore� It has� been Inspected: nstruct A'fj'�'�w'& kp erform ed4i n�; c I t`y'rI gh t - of - way, re q u I res an Inve'sibn, of Right -of -Way, Permit obtainable, from the City E'ngl'ne;r's "A - ."ful, �aifoem�k' 3 0�taiii 1� �Jon� regaxding-,Ordinince .11 '16.030� and -Regulations governing side. seweri when: you get'permit. 0 --Top of ;side'!"%�eiffiust-have,at le"t 30. Inches cover& e at property -line, and� 12`inches, inside, property fine; :. 1. � 2 No.;��Onds�4n�,,grade t will':be permitted. 9 minimum grade of % sharper han� NbTE, No..5--_Ti�ncheatin -surface-of street irestored to original' condition. Contractors -shall'�be responsible for failure,-�duei� . 6 ,�it�ee�t must be, water settled and fcM m ay,, develop, within one year of completion. �NOTE -No. alter tor'!.do�jany other work *,than.is provided' for. in the,,permit,, or ito -do� ahy� work o' o its �tfie pipe*- n the,mal,n sewer- r aplawtenances'.except to ,in- �P`i�ROVIED)_ -BY ................. 'Date .. BY /. -,2 ............... ... ... .. .................... . ................ Date: ................................... By. OVEW '1� By ..... ........ . ...................... ZIP "Date ........ .................. .............................................. ",Riei n arks" - ............... . . .......................................................... .................. ....................... ..................................................... ........... ......... 7 ..... ............. ....... ........ ............... .................................................... .......... ............................... ............ ............................................. IBO OPI M AT/E - Sik-ned'By Qwner of Firm', Performi4i, ��Constructibn -PRIOK To Request� For Inspecti e on ..... ... ... ...... .. .... -hereby c6rtify,,,�-4 Ahe -sid6�s6w'er,,inst6;li�.t�'i"6'n!c6n��nidted-,under, thi'&pe'rmif .... ..... . .. I . at 0 t g� Firm,. erform n onstr6ation),, le r a 00 alIg er g.,oydinan.ces t f'thet,Ci,t of'Edmonds� .9 y Dated this4_61 . ........ ............. �Iw_ AL� OR Cheek,,,BEF E',yqu Aig for: Water IE]"11 �Ga&,E]', Tli�rhorie owe S Other -P r ewer E] .1-d The City of Edmonds APPLICATION for SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F-� ................... .......... OWNER . ...... /Z 4 JOB ADDRESS ----------- Z?, ------ 0 F- -1 L-A 0 0 EASEMENT NO . ............ ---------------- -------------- LID NO. ... ASMT. NO . .................. CONTRACTOR�c ......... PERMIT NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - ------ 7 ---- -------------------- BLOCK NO - ----------------------------- 4�� ........................................................ ................................... 4P.P.-C .......... C NAME OF ADDITION --------------------------------------------- / --------------------------------- RECOVEn ---- MAR 10 1976 Public Works VOPL > co Approved: DATE-------------------------------------------- By ................................................ PPL CA 0 S_1.4� for a, A EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- STRM 1:UO SIDE SEWER PERMIT NSTRUCTION REPAIRS LID NO. ....tCal ------- - ASMT. NO. -TOR OWNER ..... .......... CONTRAC -PERMIT NO. . ................................................................ .............................. ---------------------------------------------------- .................... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . .................................... JOB ADDRESS ...... .................................. ms cxilmiw,. s"I I I I e� NAME OF ADDITION ........ c ............................................................................ iA -'k'k ------ DATE .... V� .............. By,,.,,,,!� .. ........ . APPLICATION for City of Edmonds SIDE SEWER PERMIT NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS F1 OWNER �-s ..... ------------------------- JOB ADDRESS ........... _c;wx ... 1*7 ---------- 0 0 EASEMENT NO - -------------------------------------------- LID NO. ASMT. NO . .................. CONTRACTOl"LT .. ..... co 4�6) vu ................ PERMIT NO. .... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO - ------ 7 --------------------------- BLOCK NO - ------------------------------------ c ........... ................................... /-// �.. �11!!!7 . ....................................................... NAME OF ADDITION .................................................................. IVER ------- ...................... REM . MAR 10 19761 -4 /VO Puwic Wow D"t CTOEET FILE CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER COi,1NECTION RECOMMENDATION Date February 3, 1976 Address of Property to be Connected 20602 86th Place W. Owner Name & Mailing Address Craig Harold (same as above) Legal Description: L.I.D. 161, Asses. No. 352 Recommendation: Findings: 1. House is within 200 ft of sewer .2. House can rea ' ch.sewer by gravity 3. Property was assessed for sewers Reconmendation: Uhder City Codes, this house must connect City Engineer CITY ENk^ITNEER'S SEWER CONNFCTION RECOMMENDATTON Date Address of Proper ty to be Connected Owner Name & Mailing Address Legal Description: 3-5 [I P 16 Recommendation: C IJ Or- Poo— C, r&-4 v -j Ole (20 AJAM r.ncrv-- 6/14/7U INTEIi--61FIFICE COMMUNICATIG,-.5 TO FORM 41 - LITTLE'S FROM DATE 197 %7 �7-/ 0,11-5 - - SUBJECT: O.A/ <- '4. c;2 6 r/, a4z) 1-2 1/1V -Y a. A o All -7,y a -2—o Z RECEIVED V, JUN 6 1974 Edmonds Engr. 06pt. ROUTING FlOWi ly)- RECEIVED. JUN G 1974 Idmollds Ellgr. Dept. Tn i- i ;4 '1 2. 4. Message: From: 4c.L h)ly�lze-" ,E.7-72' Date: pi, 41 0 11 jq ON PL. W. -A :1 4 �'AV E. L A TRF�ES:� ON T-H I E PARCEL. yL. I D r- r- W T- l(O Iri I ; f 7L -Z o 6 U. 333 I I Zipper Zeman Associa Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting KRC Custom Remodeling 8039 Jones Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98117 STREET FILE, Attention: Mr. Kimball R. Coffroth Subject: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Study Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Coffroth: J-1751 20 November 2003 a5v-40 RECEIVED DEC 8 2003 PERMIT COUNTER Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA) is pleased to present herein a copy of the above - referenced report. This report presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study relative to foundation design and construction considerations for the proposed garage addition to the Bailey residence located. in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of the study was to establish general surface and subsurface, conditions at the site from which conclusions and recommendations regarding foundation design and construction considerations could be formulated. The scope of our services consisted of limited field explorations, geotechnical engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. Our scope of services did not include sampling or testing of soil or water for regulated environmental contaminants. Should the nature of the proposed site improvements change from those described herein, our firm should be provided the opportunity to review the plans in order to verify that the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are appropriate for the design. This report is an instrument of service and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of Kimball Coffroth and his agents for specific application to this project and site location. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is currently occupied by an existing single-family residence. We understand that the owner plans to construct a garage addition on the south side of the existing house, adjacent to the south -facing slope. The site is accessed off 86 th Place West via a paved driveway. The residence is situated approximately 10 feet below 86 1h Place West on a relatively level portion of the lot. The property contains slopes located on the south and west sides of the lot. Existing houses, 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 I- Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J- 1751 20 November 2003 Page 2 including the house to the south which is currently under construction, are located below the slopes. The slope on the south side of the lot appeared to be approximately 10 to 15 feet in height with an inclination of approximately 18 to 20 degrees. We observed that several small cuts had recently been made into the south -facing slope including along the toe. Surface water was not observed at any time during our site visits. However, small areas of surface water erosion were observed on the south -facing slope. Subsurface Conditions The limited subsurface exploration consisted of excavating two shallow hand holes at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The explorations were located in those portions of the site where the proposed site improvements are to be made. Soil descriptions presented in this report are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at specific exploration locations across the site. Variations in subsurface conditions may exist between the exploration locations and the nature and extent of variations between the explorations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. The shallow hand dug holes were excavated on the existing slope along the south edge of the proposed garage addition. The excavations encountered approximately 2 to 3 feet of loose, moist brown, silty sand with some gravel. Pieces of metal and old construction debris were also encountered. These soils were interpreted to be a fill material. Farther down the slope, within an exposed cut from construction of the residence to the south, we observed soils that consisted of moist, light brown, silty sand with some gravel interpreted to be glacial till. The upper approximately 2 feet of the glacial till was weathered and in a medium dense condition. The underlying unweathered glacial till was in a dense condition. Groundwater Groundwater in the form of perched water or seepage was not observed in any of the excavations at the time of our field exploration. However, perched ground water can develop on top of the unweathered glacial till during periods of extended wet weather due to the relatively impermeable nature of the soil. It should be noted that groundwater conditions might fluctuate due to seasonal precipitation variation, site utilization, irrigation, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, development of the garage addition is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint utilizing shallow foundations and slab -on -grade floor support. However, remedial repair of bearing soils will be necessary due to the loose nature of the near surface fill soils. The following sections of this report detail our Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 3 Yd Avenue West, Suite It 7 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 I Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 3 recommendations relative to site preparation, structural fill placement, foundations, slab -on - grade floor, drainage considerations and erosion mitigation. ISite Preparation The proposed garage site is mantled by a deposit of fill which contains debris and is in a loose condition. This existing fill will not be suitable for support of the proposed garage and should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. The zone of removal should extend laterally beyond the perimeter of the garage a distance at least equal to the thickness of the existing fill plus 3 feet. Requirements for structural fill are presented in the following section. Structural Fill All fill should be placed in accordance with the following recommendations for "structural fill". All structural fill material should be free of organic material, debris and other deleterious materials. The maximum individual particle size of soils used for structural fill should be less than 3-inches. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts no greater than 8-inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D 1557). The suitability of soils for structural fill use depends primarily on the gradation and moisture content of the soil when it is placed. As the amount of fines (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult, or impossible, to achieve. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight (based on that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve) cannot be compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. The optimum moisture content is that which yields the greatest soil density under a given compactive effort. Site preparation and structural fill placement should be monitored by a representative from our firm to confirm that adequate support is provided for the proposed garage. Spread Footings The proposed garage may be supported on conventional spread footings. These footings should be founded on the medium dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural fill which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial till. The spread footings along the south, southeast and southwest portions of the garage will be located in close proximity to the south -facing slope. These footings should have a minimum setback of 3 feet, measured horizontally from the face of the footing to the nearest point on the Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33"d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 I Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 4 adjacent slope. In addition, the footings should be situated below an imaginary plane extending at an inclination of 1: 1 (Horizontal: Vertical) up from the toe of the adjacent south -facing slope. Isolated column footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches while continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches. The footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade for frost protection.. Spread footings designed and constructed as recommended may be proportioned using a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third to accommodate transient dynamic loads such as wind and seismic forces. We estimate that total footing settlements will be on the order of I inches, or less. Differential settlements are expected to be less that Y2 inch over a distance of 30 feet. Most of these settlements are *expected to occur rapidly as loads as applied. Under no circumstances should footings be cast atop loose or soft soil, slough, debris or surfaces bearing water. We recommend that a representative from our firm observe the condition of the footing subgrades prior to pouring of concrete in order to verify that the bearing soils are undisturbed and that conditions are consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Slab -On -Grade Floor The slab -on -grade floor for the garage should be founded on the medium dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural flll which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial till. At least 4 inches of crushed rock should be placed on the subgrade to act as a leveling course and a capillary break. Drainage Considerations We recommend that footing drains be installed around the perimeter of the garage. Footing drains should consist of a minimum 4-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe fully enveloped in pea gravel or washed rock. The perforated PVC should be directed to drain to a suitable discharge. Site grades should be planned to provide a positive surface dra inage away from the structure and to avoid ponding. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drains. Instead, a separate tight line drain system should be installed for the roof drains to direct runoff away from the completed structure. I Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington Erosion Mitigation J- 1751 20 November 2003 Page 5 Soil erosion is a natural process that is often aggravated by construction activities. Removal of Vegetation, modification of topography, and poorly managed stormwater runoff are major contributors to erosion. In addition, some soils are particularly susceptible to erosion because of particle size gradation or density. I Erosion and sedimentation controls are recommended during construction to reduce the impacts to adjacent areas. Erosion control measures should be designed to prevent sediment transport. This may be accomplished by constructing water bars or utilizing other methods to control surface water runoff, and constructing silt fences to control sedimentation. If construction is accomplished during the winter months, we further recommend that temporary erosion protection be provided consisting of covering exposed soil areas with plastic sheeting and/or straw. . We recommend that all bare soil areas be planted or mulched as soon as possible. It may be necessary to provide temporary erosion protection until vegetation has been reestablished. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the limited explorations accomplished for this study. The number, location and depth of the explorations for this study were completed within the site and scope constraints of the project so as to yield the information necessary to formulate our recommendations. The integrity and performance of the foundation systems at this site depend greatly on proper site preparation and construction procedures. Field judgment by a qualified engineer will be necessary in order to determine the adequacy of the site drainage and foundation support systems. Therefore, because of our familiarity with the site soils, we recommend that Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during the earthwork and foundation construction phases of the project. If variations in the subsurface conditions are observed at the time of construction, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering recommendations to the contractor and design team in a timely manner as the project construction progresses. ZiPRer Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 3 Yd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 6 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you, and would be pleased to discuss the contents of this report or other aspects of the project with you at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Assqciate,,s, Inc. A Gregory Simons Staff Geologist' "n ro James B. Thompson Principal Enclosures: Figure 1 — Site and Exploration Plan Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Rl I` -.nLU cl 'L-u 00 4A� H NT Etl '� TO 14V�E T- -.t L -t-n - -7 0.51 12.1 Pdall L2 i irod),-4u 1 11 1 (t) �ZEAO, SH�ACX I (E) ECK, 11E) I OR I VE�, I S&B LEGEND: SHH-1 HAND HOLE NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION 0 20 40 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET C4 (P c341 (E). DRIVE r - 245 :z lu LL, JAI 2 Rl LL -1 A I Lu I Lu 1 2(3 "n, 0 T I I (E),,R r.)GE I 10111, 1 of 0 k- % . I I (L 1 11 . P. POIN —E)ATUM 26.51 %\ 11 10�.5 IIZI + 100 TOP 0 .L �lp. 11, A PRQPO$ED - 81 SLIWACE 94RAGi\ STREET M 24.59 e6 51 LIJI -2 Lu Lu HH-1 SO R 9 Pj-. Base map provided by C. B. ANDERSON ARCHITECTS., Dated 09130103. �) L 77- &V) AbDI GUTTERS/DO /AND SPLASH E;,4��H5NT �NTO A.!I (5(o -5 3?; I�pp' R ED C6 4GIN I 9Y IENGIM 4 1) �-EAI� SLTBAGl< 1 = LLJ —KN C C) < (COPY (N 'u P.L. 150.0' `0 94' Cp OVV N E I C iff "�a ii POIN&w.l. INSPO S FCR E190SION1 em JgLo (E)DRIVE 2 �4. E��' EASTING/904SE (EtRIDGE 1011i E) 1 E 0�11- V DRIYEWAY �E AOANOO�IEC) I G ---------- (SHOW� [5l,4%el�rlll 5(05 izr CL (0 t7 2 &.5 PRQP04ED ORArE-�\\\ j 24.51 G Lu > Lu 7: LU - Lu I -4 C) I I Z I LL, I -1 Z -j I u- Lu I I- Lu -q 0) I tu T III Oil F), R \ P. :4 A ------------ -FN V LIJ uj < M "7" L. 150.0 51TE AT PROPOSED r-3ARAGE SHALL 5E PREPARED 5Y REMOVE EXITNG 5 LOOSE SOIL AND 5TRUCTURAL FILL 5HALL 5E ADDED AS PER GEOTEOH. REPORT ATTACWED. SITE PLAN NORTH 5CALE.- 11' = 20'-0' 501-111 FRONT SETE3AGK OLUNE David 5afle� 20(o02.86th Place West Edmonds, LUA 13602ro SITE ADDRES 20602 Broth pl. east Edmonds, WA IB,902& Parcel 00544&00000-�-102 REdEIVED,,f) Lu DEC. 15 2003 PERMIT COUNTER 0 vil LUJI :> DATUM POINT a 0 ;zz CL + 100 TOP OF CL SURFAGE STREET DRAIN HEIGPT CALC -J(@ A +6ro B' x +aro z +610' AVRG GRADE= +86.15' ACTUAL= +101' (E) MAXIMUMc +111.15' > uj z LOT COVERAGE < 2,25B -1-F (14.55".) LOT AREA z X Lu 15,150 SF Lu LOT SLOP IMPERVIOUS SURFAC (E) 5LOG ROOF OUTLINE (PRE IS11): IS56 SF (E) DRIVE (PRE 1911)" 540 SF (E) DRIVE (POST IS-1-1): 1313 -AF (E) PORCH (POST IiJ11): 254 5F PROPOSED GARAGE ROOF OUTLINE: 44(o -AF 'IV ZONE SETBACKS: FRONT SIDE REAR OTHER HEIGHT 'a(,) 60-z P � kA) I I I I Zipper Zeman Associa Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting KRC Custom Remodeling 8039 Jones Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98117 Attention: Mr. Kimball R. Coffroth Ira Subject: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Study Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Coffroth: J- 1751 20 November 2003 yt'5�0 RECEIVED DEC 8 2003 PERMIT COUNTER Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA) is pleased to present herein a copy of the above - referenced report. This report presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study relative to foundation design and construction considerations for the proposed garage addition to the Bailey residence located in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of the study was to establish general surface and subsurface conditions at the site from which conclusions and recommendations regarding foundation design and construction considerations could be formulated. The scope of our services consisted of limited field explorations, geotechnical engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. Our scope of services did not include sampling or testing of soil or water for regulated environmental contaminants. Should the nature of the proposed site improvements change from those described herein, our firm should be provided the opportunity to review the plans in order to verify that the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are appropriate for the design. This report is an instrument of service and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of Kimball Coffroth and his agents for specific application to this project and site location. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is currently occupied by an existing single-family residence. We understand that the owner plans to construct a garage addition on the south side of the existing house, adjacent to the south -facing slope. The site is accessed off 86 th Place West via a paved driveway. The residence is situated approximately 10 feet below 86 th Place West on a relatively level portion of the lot. The property contains slopes located on the south and west sides of the lot. Existing houses, 1 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Ba'iley Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J- 1751 20 November 2003 Page 2 including the house to the south which is currently under construction, are located below the slopes. The slope on the south side of the lot appeared to be approximately 10 to 15 feet in height with an inclination of approximately 18 to 20 degrees. We observed that several small cuts had recently been made into the south -facing slope including along the toe. Surface water was not observed at any time during our site visits. However, small areas of surface water erosion were observed on the south -facing slope. ISubsurface Conditions The limited subsurface exploration consisted6f excavating two shallow hand holes at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The explorations were located in those portions of the site where the proposed site improvements are to be made. Soil descriptions presented in this report are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at specific exploration locations across the site. Variations in subsurface conditions may exist between the exploration locations and the nature and extent of variations between the explorations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. The shallow hand dug holes were excavated on the existing slope along the south edge of the proposed garage addition. The excavations encountered approximately 2 to 3 feet of loose, moist brown, silty sand with some gravel. Pieces of metal and old construction debris were also encountered. These soils were interpreted to be a fill material. Farther down the slope, within an exposed cut from construction of the residence to the south, we observed soils that consisted of moist, light brown, silty sand with some gravel interpreted to be glacial till. The upper approximately 2 feet of the glacial till was weathered and in a medium dense condition. The underlying unweathered glacial till was in a dense condition. Groundwater Groundwater in the form of perched water or seepage was not observed in any of the excavations at the time of our field exploration. However, perched ground water can develop on top of the unweathered glacial fill during periods of extended wet weather due to the relatively impermeable nature of the soil. It should be noted that groundwater conditions might fluctuate due to seasonal precipitation variation, site utilization, irrigation, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, development of the garage addition is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint utilizing shallow foundations and slab -on -grade floor support. However, remedial repair of bearing soils will be necessary due to the loose nature of the near surface fill soils. The following sections of this report detail our I Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 3 Yd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 I B�iley Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 3 recommendations relative to site preparation, structural fill placement, foundations, slab -on - grade floor, drainage considerations and erosion mitigation. Site Preparation The proposed garage site is mantled by a deposit of fill which contains debris and is in a loose condition. This existing fill will not be suitable for support of the proposed garage and should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. The zone of removal should extend laterally beyond the perimeter of the garage a distance at least equal to the thickness of the existing fill plus 3 feet. Requirements for structural fill are presented in the following section. Structural Fill All fill should be placed in accordance with the following recommendations for structural fill". All structural fill material should be free of organic material, debris and other deleterious materials. The maximum individual particle size of soils used for structural fill should be less than 3-inches. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts no greater than 8-inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D 1557). The suitability of soils for structural fill use depends primarily on the gradation and moisture content of the soil when it is placed. As the amount of fines (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult, or impossible, to achieve. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight (based on that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve) cannot be compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. The optimum moisture content is that which yields the greatest soil density under a given compactive effort. Site preparation and structural fill placement should be monitored by a representative from our firm to confirm that adequate support is provided for the proposed garage. Spread Footings The proposed garage may be supported on conventional spread footings. These footings should be founded on the medium dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural fill which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial till. The spread footings along the south, southeast and southwest portions of the garage will be located in close proximity to the south -facing slope. These footings should have a minimum setback of 3 feet, measured horizontally from the face of the footing to the nearest point on the Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 4 adjacent slope. In addition, the footings should be situated below an imaginary plane extending at an inclination of 1: 1 (Horizontal: Vertical) up from the toe of the adjacent south -facing slope. Isolated column footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches while continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches. The footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade for frost protection.. Spread footings designed and constructed as recommended may be proportioned using a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third to accommodate transient dynamic loads such as wind and seismic forces. We estimate that total footing settlements will be on the order of 1 inches, or less. Differential settlements are expected to be less that Y2 inch over a distance of 30 feet. Most of these settlements are expected to occur rapidly as loads as applied. Under no circumstances should footings be cast atop loose or soft soil, slough, debris or surfaces bearing water. We reconunend that a representative from our firm observe the condition of the footing subgrades prior to pouring of concrete in order to verify that the bearing soils are undisturbed and that conditions are consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Slab -On -Grade Floor The slab -on -grade floor for the garage should be founded on the medium dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural fill which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial'till. At least 4 inches of crushed rock should be placed on the subgrade to act as a leveling course and a capillary break. Drainage Considerations We recommend that footing drains be installed around the perimeter of the garage. Footing drains should consist of a minimum 4-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe fully enveloped in pea gravel or washed rock. The perforated PVC should be directed to drain to a suitable discharge. Site grades should be planned to provide a positive surface drainage away from the structure and to avoid ponding. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drains. Instead, a separate tight line drain system should be installed for the roof drains to direct runoff away from the completed structure. I Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bifley Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington Erosion Mitigation J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 5 Soil erosion is a natural process that is often aggravated by construction activities. Removal of vegetation, modification of topography, and poorly managed stormwater runoff are major contributors to erosion. In addition, some soils are particularly susceptible to erosion because of particle size gradation or density. Erosion and sedimentation controls are recommended during construction to reduce the impacts to adjacent areas. Erosion control measures should be designed to prevent sediment transport. This may be accomplished by constructing water bars or utilizing other methods to control surface water runoff, and constructing silt fences to control sedimentation. If construction is accomplished during the winter months, we further recommend that temporary erosion protection be provided consisting of covering exposed soil areas with plastic sheeting and/or straw. We recommend that all bare soil areas be planted or mulched as soon as possible. It may be necessary to provide temporary erosion protection until vegetation has been reestablished. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the limited explorations accomplished for this study. The number, location and depth of the explorations for this study were completed within the site and scope constraints of the project so as to yield the information necessary to formulate our recommendations. The integrity and performance of the foundation systems at this site depend greatly on proper site preparation and construction procedures. Field judgment by a qualified engineer will be necessary in order to determine the adequacy of the site drainage and foundation support systems. Therefore, because of our familiarity with the site soils, we recommend that Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during the earthwork and foundation construction phases of the project. If variations in the subsurface conditions are observed at the time of construction, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering recommendations to the contractor and design team in a timely manner as the project construction progresses. I Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 6 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you, and would be pleased to discuss the contents of this report or other aspects of the project with you at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Ass9ciates, Inc. 16 D'. Gregory Simons 0 9; AP Staff Geologist' -o, R- F� Tr-, James B. Thompson Principal Enclosures: Figure I — Site and Exploration Plan Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. 18905 3 Yd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 01 Z a) 3L tu < f 4 llu ro C3 4A� M N ) WIV�El �5' Co's C-4, EAST11 1 1 (10 lPEA0, S�THACK (E) 1 ECK, (E E ---------- :>R R� �Vloki 86 5 86.5. C4 CIS) L. 1500' (P (p S4 (E). D PIZIVE WrT ra r — 245 Lu Lu A EI, — -1 "1 1 1 A - Lu LU Z I Lu I Lu LIN Ila (E),,R IDGE 1 0 4 c'q —DATUM POIN 2651 ZI + 100 TOP 0 PRQPO$ED SURFACE p4moll-" �aT 6TREET M 245 —Of e6 uJ AL HH-2 0 1-0 1 1 HH- &: -I jo'- tun, < �Lu m- - ii 0 ooz LEGEND: W kn HH-1 HAND HOLE NUMBER AND Base map provided by C. B. ANDERSON ARCHITECTS., Dated 09r30W. APPROXIMATE LOCATION I 0 20 40 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET SIREET FILE' CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT C3 Public Works a Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: February 10, 1994 To: Robert Long 20602 - 86th Place West Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Determination of Non -Significance City of Edmonds, Building Plan Check No. 93-52 Transmitting: Determination of Non -Significance and Environmental Checklist For your information: As you requested: For your file: Comment and return: Note attachments: Comments: Planning Division Judy Kenney, Planning Secretary LAURA M. HALL MAYOR 9 Incorporated August 11, 1890 * Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 8 go _I qc� Date: To: Subject: 0 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 - 5TH AVE. N. - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Public Works 9 Planning e Parks and Recreation * Engineering LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL February 10, 1994 Department of Ecology Determination of Non -Significance City of Edmonds, Building Plan Check No. 93-52 Transmitting: Determination of Non -Significance and Environmental Checklist For your information: xx As you requested: For your file: Comment and return: Note attachments: Comments: Planning Division Judy Kenney, Planning SecretaU LAURA M. HALL MAYOR 0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0 Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan 0 11 CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 CZ06) 771,3202 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Installation of 3 foot retaining wall and grading of approximately 1,000 cubic yards. (City of Edmonds Building Plan Check No. 93-52). Proponent: Robert Long I,ocation of proposal, -including street address if any: 20602 86th Place West, Edmonds, Washington Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by .1994. Responsible Official: Ann Bullis Position/Title: Code Enforcment Officer, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: 1 J4 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Rob Chave, Community Services Director, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 1994 by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to,make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on /0 1994 at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist; XX Department of Ec ology XX Robert Long (Applicant) Environmental Review Section 20602 86th Place West P.O. Box 47703 Edmonds, WA 98026 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Attachments: Critical Areas Determination # CA-93-68 Environmental Checklist PC: Building Plan Check No. 93-52 SEPA Notebook Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EDMONDS JAN" ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 'y go - 199 — Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructionsfor Applicants. This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give tile best descripti i ion you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, �ou should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or prcject plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know* or does not apply". complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnece-s-sary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answer.,; or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be si,,nific'ant adverse impact. n I Use of checklistfor nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonprqlect proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). ' For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as .proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: t'J r'� 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: :2-1-7-3 17 4. Date checklist prepared: -2 1 AA tj i �/ Page I of 22 0 n< LTMO-15-93.M AKTrR 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): le-4-4- MA!j (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related tcr or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has. been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. k (STAFF COMUENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will he needed for your proposal, if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 2 of 22 CHKLT11O-!S-93.MAVTER 11. Give brief, complete dese ' ription of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers, on this page. 0 4 V &t. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Ucation of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the.precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 11 ) f t 1 -1 4 e- DI 2-0 IIOZ— 91, .1 ' 12 L� '-J -J Sc," LO -7 42rAe rldrip (STAFF COMMENTS) TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly mountainous, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, cla . sgand, gravel, p�at, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note an�y Pa.-e 3 of 22 C1fKLT/10-25-93.MAKrER (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. no (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of rill. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Y\(.) r\Q— (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa.-C 4 of 22 OGMT/10-25-91MASTCR h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR P Ir 0 t!t� Ok4CA t ^ 4 5 e a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. .1-1 On (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measuras to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: f) ": in &--.. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonai streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (STAFF COMMENTS) ' Page 5 of 22 C11K1_T/1C.!5-93.MVTrr.R (2) Will the pro.ject require any work over, in, or adJacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, plewse describe and attach available plans. ho (STAFF CONMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of rill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface - water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of rill material. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? *Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does (lie proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of wasteand anticipated volume of discharge. (STAFF COMMENTS) CHUT/10-25-93MASTER Pap� 6 of 22 9 0 b. Ground: (1) Will ground water he withdrawn, or will water he discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humaws the system(s) are expected to serve. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Rlunoff(including storm water): (1) Doicrihe the source or runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, irany (include quantities, if known). Where will this water how? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ,-.-e k (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 7 or 22 CUKU/10-2.5-93AMTER 0 4. Plants a. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: shrubs grass pasture crop or grain %vet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgras-s, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What kind and amount or vegetation -will he removed or altered? (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to he on or near the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping,. use of native plant,,;, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Pne 8 of 22 OWLT110.25-93MASTrK (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals I a. Check or circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, tither: cr 0 --., -V mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, tither: eA 5 k,4A. to fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) h. List any threatened or endangered species known to he on or nmir the site. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 0 Q (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlire, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources Page 9 of 22 OWITAMIS-91A4 ASITR a. What kinds (if energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed proJect's energy needs? Describewhether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Y') o (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your proJect affect the potential tise of solar energy by adjacent. prop�rties? If so, generally describe. rl t-:) (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plaits of this proposal? List other proposed ineasure-s to reduce or control energy impact.-,, if my: P 0 /1 e- I (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and ex plosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 10 of 22 cuKLi:/io-zs-q3.i,iAs-rER 0 (1) Describe special emergency services that might he required. 400e- (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health ha72rds, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise -/j 0/7 r- (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your prqject (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? )? bil I!f-. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels ofnoise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-terin basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. h 0/1 (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 41 0/1 io (STAFF COMMENTS) Page I I of 22 CHK1-T/10-25-93.MASTFR 0 0 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and ad.jacent properties? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture9 If so, describe. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. M�4 )-%:2 &14 - (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures he demolished? If so, what? (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa.-e 12 of 22 ClIKU110-25-93MASTCR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?_.. .- (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Has any part of the site been classified as in "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed pro.ject? (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed proJect displace? - 001")-4-7 (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa.-C 13 of 22 C14KLT110-25-93.MAVTER k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - K2 0 rJe- (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) . - 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing, impacts, if any: tv (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 14 of 22 CIUCLT/10-25-93.10ASTER E 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? -A A -WI � A , 3EA:,L (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What view.-; in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? . .11 (D /k C— (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: (STA FF CO NI NI ENTS) it. Lightand Glare a. What type of light or glare will tile proposal produce? What time (if day would it mainly occur? (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from tile finished proJect he a safety hazard or interfere with views? 0 tlak (STAFF COMMENTS) C.14KI3110-2.5-93AMWER Page 1 -5 of 22 C. WIMt existing of*f'-site sourcLs of* light or glare may affect your proposal? YO Orve- (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures; to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: .(STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What &-signatedand inrormal recreational opportunitiesare in the immediate vicinity? (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Would the proposed pro.ject displaceany existing recreation uses? If so, describe. A (STAFF COM NJ ENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts (in I recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the pro.ject orapplicant, if'any: Ok (STAFF COMMENTS) Page 16 of 22 CWLT/10-2.5-93MASTER 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or obiects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to he on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N (STAFF COMMINTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence 'of historic, archaeolo gical, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. �J&Jtl/ (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed mewsures to reduce or control impacts, if any: (STAFF COMMENTS) 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highway.� serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plan-;, if my. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is (lie approximate distance to the nearest transit Stop? NO Page 17 of 22 C1 1K LT11 0-25-9-1. M ASTER 0 (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed prcject have? How many would the project eliminate? Kt P� (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity (if) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. INV (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would he genera(ed by the completed project? If known, indicate When peak volumes would occur. % P1 (STAFF COMMENTS) Nwe 18 of 22 CIWXT/10-2�-93.MASTER g. Proposed ineasurLs to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 7269 (STAFF COMMENTS) 15. Public Services a. Would the proJect result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? irso, generally describe. NO (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measurLN to reduce or control direct impact.*; on public services, if any: .(STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities n a . Circle utilities currently available at (lie sile./le-I-e�Ctrici" r'�natural gas, r,,,re'fuse se ic lepho e, nitary �enver,-�eptic systeni, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) Pa.-e 19 of 22 CUMT/10-25-91MASTER 0 E C. b. Describe (lie utilities that are proposed for the pro.ject, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity %%,hich might be needed. (STAFF COMMENTS) SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature a ProponerL/ -5N -JAf4. ell -- Date Submitted Pi�-c 20 of 22 CWLT110-25-91MASTER D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheerfor project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conJunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal he likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or ha7ardous substances; or production of noise? Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increasL-s are: tj 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, f ish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal he likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measurLs to protect or comserve energy and natural resources are: Pa�-e 21 of 22 C"KLT110-25-93.MA.STER 4. How would the proposal he likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural �ites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? n One Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - y1ok-kc- 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompafible with existing plans? 0 Proposed ineasu:-L�s to avoid (or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: L) V'- -,C- 6. How would the proposal he likely to increase demands (in transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or rL-�pond to such deniand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Page 22 of 22 C1(KLT/*2.5-93.MASTER 0 MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 TO: BUILDING DEPT. PLAN CHECK NO. 93 -52 FROM: Ann Bullis, Planning Division DATE: - FEBRUARY 10, 1994 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERN41NATION FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 20602 86TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON I have had the opportunity to review the environmental checklist, and Critical Areas Determination, a copy of which are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that a determination of nonsignificance. be issued. Attachments PC: FILE NO. 93-52 Page 2 of 2 Critical Areas Checklist" Site Information Project Name: Permit Number. SiteLocation: Property Tax Account Number. Approximate Site Size (acres or square feet): lUve you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before? General Site Conditions 1. Has the site been cleared or logged? (-Ile4r Date of most recent action: Soils I Topography ,-,?2- In the Snohomish County Soil-Sd�v�hat is the mapped soil type(s)? Ald 06LL14061t1(110-�e) 3. Dcson'be the geneml site toMgmphy.2fheck all that apply. Flat less thari 5 feet elevation change over entire site. Rolling: slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a horizontal distance of 66 feet.) 1013r. slopes present on site of more than 15% and less than'30Yp ( a vertical rise of 10 feet of horizontal distance.) Stom: grades of greater than 30% present on site. Comments Hydrology/Vegetation 4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water- 5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water- 110 —Approx- Depth: 6. Site is in the-floodway a 0 floodplain of a water -course. 7. Site contains a creek or an area wh= water flows across the grounds surface? flows. are year-round? Flows are seasonal? 8. Site is primarily-, forested meadow shrubs -; mixed 9. Obvious wetland is present on site: a 0 , 10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: 0 Q 4- 11. Critical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site: 4 6 9 For-.0ty.-Use-0n] k rga s d- e -WAIVE a r'e'a*s-.�tu*dy'1s'-*-'fi** bt re�juired. .k .Det�rmination,N umber-. CA.' Revipwa&�� Planner ate 0 (: � / -3'// 0. �, -re -� a-4- i�e- 1,2, are- cv/ rl�ly 4ree e � fi,/ 'p (, o/ e" �-/ weaw�oqe �,-m 54p��7 Ar e- e, i 6 74/ //- e6 5- woe, 'WI us 70// kv; tV14 q Vo - 3� -3,� IV* RECEIVED 12092 PERMIT COUNTER fvl-,I-- t4o F' rff, ,wA - -h'4 lit v L I -M %,�t 7 -1 J 4 IMI. T." on.-Treemd 946',4 (4g (425) 7.74'0682. (42,B) 486�895.8 !,:,,l 66ft URI 7 aQ4 -.26th V A ': I I �:�, 11 12 '85;� 8 Fa` 2'5).. PROPOSVUBMr"EDTO 'I, P WORK:i Elm'. -STREET, CITY 5AN ZIP CO ',SYR ZIP. I EPT, 7 7 ESTIMATOR, DATE, OF PLANS ;7 r f,'C STATEAND-ZIP CODE _;000. kqtiuial bid .gWen for worl�,;qbe 00ne, _d � S.6 A i N U P11T V: j i�: Po 7=7, U A yij 7, 147, . 0" + 1 41. C 7- 770� DEPOSIT.$" F*Ao .�vit�-allTrdeo6*yilpt�oreLmAy:;�0�orpeDot.mi�g TO _qbNbbbry,'5majlfrrees, ev.�kx-MrIcArea U�niess�,oipqi%m .And Additionil-Cpargei Apply, k" *",'Npt- e6po'nsibi OrUtidetQr�4�4L 7_ SysjQ tump� rinding.'; G "�AodtG'iihdin§,Npl'lriciyyed�ipStmMp.Grihd�ngUple.SSSprecifed��- -Da e Visa or'MC Exp. t 't.'Ah�'SpacJai PirffiifjAeqUlred on this j ffie Re 0 011ily 00 is b�n er 6f:tKe Pr6p;hy - ''C "A 9. U00mer is Signature �rh _�esponsiblqfo�,�n� egillFlarnificabohrausectby oyl� a Y� ;J'"sihformaA0n2giv nby Qlient;, andAgreas To Pay All Attome F arges. 'MA�STERCARD,AND. VISA RATES:AT 60e..' Your signature here. il, a*ccepjance of Visa or MC'ch' Ord f MOW in: a �nce�w h a t a 94 tJ �c ihereby tolyrnish 'material and*lab�t% P. r,tp,�sum o j�ve� �poq!� m lqLW Q Payment to be made, as follows:- ..,Well'bea &,wr en.. n r & 16SU1. itt .,1 7 OTE: *d �P+aymenton, 6ompie.fid.0 vp�� M1111oh �Pollars b d by 4.0 4 ) , .-, - "I . " '... , : I JJ Ibe charged I 0%,of-Bil tith d' d qahcellatlq�nq not- given -48 hou�s- in a6anice Will' P.zQ o FlEtl, TOTAL f r resc6eduling Allw4kcompleted must bepaid forwith!16 j diitys�&completlol)roibalinde osal M ofr$30.0'a subjq6t to.collectidiri'fee ndA 8% per, annual- and, attortley feels., 8:�Thli p -days; I Nbti , . PM _ ay,b withdmwn,by.u6 Knot acp0ptpd,w �Unlejs bthe.rvise.previ6,6sly..�iitkh"6�., 9 e 0 pt,41iri abov pric s�ecificat6g,' -11 na�ul; c nditions are satIsfacibry. and4r6 here6�, 9.�copted, Yqv�are.authodzedtq,d6.th 1� 'MaV1,; W 011;- WW'� F(4 2 fie fth In eCt 'n ele c nditi.n. specified, 120meniwill 'be made as.�Wn'acl above.. 71'. Date of Acceptance: �l natu No� REFULND...'ON TAEE-W0'Rk Zipper Zeman Ass ociates, Inc*. Geotechnical and Environm6ntal Consulting KRC Custom Remodeling REET FILE 8039 Jones Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98117 Attention: Mr. Kimball R. Coffroth Subject: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Study Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Coffroth: J- 1751 20 November 2003 SO Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA) is pleased to present herein a copy of the above - referenced report. This report presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering study relative to foundation:design and construction considerations for the proposed garage addition to the Bailey residence located in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of the study was to establish general surface and subsurface conditions at the site from which conclusions and recommendations regarding foundation design and construction considerations could be formulated. The scope of our services consisted of limited field explorations, geotechnical engineering analysis, and,preparation of this report. Our scope of services did not include sampling or testing of soil or water for regulated environmental contaminants. Should the nature of the proposed site improvements change from those described herein, our finn should be provided the opportunity to review the plans in order to verify that the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are appropriate for the design. This report is an instrument of service and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of Kimball Coffroth and his agents for specific application to this project and site location. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is currently occupied by r.n existing single-family residence. We understand that the owner plans to construct a garage addition on the south side of the existing house, adjacent to the south -facing slope. The site is accessed off 86 th Place West via a paved driveway. The residence is situated approximately 10 feet below 86 1h Place West on a relatively level portion of the lot. The property contains slopes located on the south and west sides of the lot. Existing houses, 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition J-1751 Edmonds, Washington 20 November 2003 Page 2 including the house to the south which is currently under construction, are located. below the slopes. The slope on the south side of the lot appeared to be approximately 10 to 15 feet in height with an inclination of approximately 18 to 20 degrees. We observed that several small cuts had recently been made into the south -facing slope including along the toe. Surface water was not observed at any time during our site visits. However, small areas of surface water erosion were observed on the south -facing slope. Subsurface Conditions The limited subsurface exploration consisted of excavating two shallow hand holes at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The explorations were located in those portions of the site where the proposed site improvements are to be made. Soil descriptions presented in this report are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at specific exploration locations across the site. Variations in subsurface conditions may exist between the exploration locations and the nature and extent of variations between the explorations may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, it may be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. The shallow hand dug holes were excavated on the existing slope along the south edge of the proposed garage addition, The excavations encountered approximately 2 to 3 feet of loose, moist brown, silty sand with some gravel. Pieces of metal and old construction debris were also encountered. These soils were interpreted to be a fill material. Farther down the slope, within an exposed cut from construction of the residence to the south, we observed soils that consisted of moist, light brown, silty sand with some gravel interpreted to be glacial till. The upper approximately 2 feet of the glacial till was weathered and in a medium dense condition. The underlying unweathered glacial fill was in a dense condition. Groundwater Groundwater in the form of perched water or seepage was not observed in any of the excavations at the time of our field exploration. However, perched ground water can develop on top of the unweathered glacial fill during periods of extended wet weather due to the relatively impermeable nature of the soil. It should be noted that groundwater conditions might fluctuate due to seasonal precipitation variation, site utilization, irrigation, and other factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site, development of the garage addition is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint utilizing shallow foundations and slab -on -grade floor support. However, remedial repair of bearing soils will be necessary due to the loose nature of the near surface fill soils. The following sections of this report detail our C. 18905 33d Avenue WM Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771- 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addition J-1751 Edmonds, Washington 20 November 2003 Page 3 recommendations relative to site preparation, structural fill placement, foundations, slab -on - grade floor, drainage considerations and erosion mitigation. Site Preparation The proposed garage site is mantled by a deposit of fill which contains debris and is in a loose condition. This existing fill will not be suitable for support of the proposed garage and should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill. The zone of removal should extend laterally beyond the perimeter of the garage a distance at least equal to the thickness of the existing fill plus 3 feet. Requirements for structural fill are presented in the following section. Structural Fill All fill should be placed in accordance with the following recommendations for 49structural fill". All structural fill material should be free of organic material, debris and other deleterious materials. The maximum individual particle size of soils used for structural fill should be less than 3-inches. Structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts no greater than 8-inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D 1557). The suitability of soils for structural fill use depends primarily on the gradation and moisture content of the soil when it is placed. As the amount of fines (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult, or impossible, to achieve. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight (based on that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve) cannot be compacted to a firm, non -yielding condition when the moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. The optimum moisture content is that which yields the greatest soil density under a given compactive effort. Site preparation and structural fill placement should be monitored by a representative from our firm to confirm that adequate support is provided for the proposed garage. Spread Footings The proposed garage may be supported on conventional spread footings. These footings should be founded on the medium dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural fill which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial till. The spread footings along the south, southeast and southwest portions of the garage will be located in close proximity to the south -facing slope. These footings should have a minimum setback of 3 feet, measured horizontally from the face of the footing to the nearest point on the ZInRer Ze n Asso a . nc, 18905 33" Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 0 0 Bailey Residence Garage Addition J-1751 Edmonds, Washington 20 November 2003 Page 4 adjacent slope. In addition, the footings should be situated below an imaginary plane extending at an inclination of 1: 1 (Horizontal: Vertical) up from the toe of the adjacent south -facing slope. Isolated column footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches while continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches. The footings should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade for frost protection.. Spread footings designed and constructed as recommended may be proportioned using a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf, This allowable bearing pressure may be increased by up to one-third to accommodate transient dynamic loads such as wind and seismic forces. We estimate that total footing settlements will be on the order of 1 inches, or less, Differential settlements are expected to be less that 1/2 inch over a distance of 30 feet. Most of these settlements are expected to occur rapidly as loads as applied. Under no circumstances should footings be cast atop loose or soft soil, slough, debris or surfaces bearing water. We recommend that a representative from our firm observe the condition of the footing subgrades prior to pouring of concrete in order to verify that the bearing soils are undisturbed and that conditions are consistent with the recommendations contained in this report. Slab -On -Grade Floor The slab -on -grade floor for the garage should be founded on the mediurn dense to dense native glacial till, or on a zone of structural fill which extends down to the medium dense to dense glacial till. At least 4 inches of crushed rock should be placed on the subgrade to act as a leveling course and a capillary break. Drainage Considerations We recommend that footing drains be installed around the perimeter of the garage. Footing drains should consist of a minimum 4-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe fully enveloped in pea gravel or washed rock. The perforated PVC should be directed to drain to a suitable discharge. Site grades should be planned to provide a positive surface drainage away from the structure and to avoid ponding. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drains. Instead, a separate tight line drain system should be installed for the roof drains to direct runoff away from the completed structure. Zloper Zeman Assecla!9,12-ca 18905 33" Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 99036 (425) 771 - 3304 Bailey Residence Garage Addi* J-1751 Edmonds, Washington 20 November 2003 Page 5 Erosion Mitigation Soil erosion is a natural process that is often aggravated by construction activities. Removal of vegetation, modification of topography, and poorly managed stormwater runoff are major contributors to erosion. In addition, some soils are particularly susceptible to erosion because of particle size gradation or density. Erosion and sedimentation controls are recommended during construction to reduce the impacts to adjacent areas. Erosion control measures should be designed to prevent sediment transport. This may be accomplished by constructing water bars or utilizing other methods to control surface water runoff, and constructing silt fences to control sedimentation. If construction is accomplished during the winter months, we farther recommend that temporary erosion protection be provided consisting of covering exposed soil areas with plastic sheeting and/or straw. We recommend that all bare soil areas be planted or mulched as soon as possible. It may be necessary to provide temporary erosion protection until vegetation has been reestablished. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the limited explorations accomplished for this study. The number, location and depth of the explorations for this study were completed within the site and scope constraints of the project so as to yield the information necessary to formulate our recommendations. The integrity and performance of the foundation systems at this site depend greatly on proper site preparation and construction procedures. Field judgment by a quali ied e gineer will be necessary in order to determine the adequacy of the site drainage and foundation support systems. Therefore, because of our familiarity with the site soils, we recommend that Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during the earthwork and foundation construction phases of the project. if variations in the subsurface conditions are observed at the time of construction, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering recommendations to- the contractor and design team in a timely manner as the project construction progresses. E� I L. 1 18905 33d Avenut West, Suile 117 iynnood, Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 I Bailey Residence Garage Addition Edmonds, Washington J-1751 20 November 2003 Page 6 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you, and would be pleased to discuss the contents of this report or other aspects of the project with you at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, Zipper Zeman Ass , poiates, Inc. �yj TITO, -will. A Gregory Simons Staff Geologist James B. Thompson Principal Enclosures: Figure I — Site and Exploration Plan C, 18905 33d Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnlooc� Washington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 0 I I LEGEND: ;�' ;t ;Q ia T (n BOO �,A T m=-MENT TO V�E. 12 V kEA0,2"LC�2K E ---------- :�l I E)l --- �Ili .55 1MV 1 HH-2 HH-1 HH-1 HAND HOI F NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION 40 V 0 20 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 2 � t3 541 (E). EAVE 24.5 tul :7 131 1,3 Y.- 1 31-4 -, I -7 A U4 N.0 I V T I (EA,RIDGE is 00 Oil all r . P. LA 041 -,RID4 I I tOPOOED --jN Uj l, )7L 2REM z Der 7cMXn AssOciste% InS ipp- Geotechnir-al and EavironmentOd Consulting 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 9M Tele: (425) 77' 1 -3304 Fax: (425) 771-3549 0! : I r.)ATLtl POIN + 100 TOP 0 5UWACE STREET E)W Of Base map provided by C. B. ANDERSON ARCHITECTS., Dated OW30M. Pro;ect No. J-1 751 Bailey Residence Date: Nov., 2003 Edmonds, 'Washington [kam by: J.D. FIGURE 1: SITE AND EXPLORATION Scale: As Noted PLAN aE0,-rEVffET CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 747-5618 FAX 747-8561 Robert Long 19924 Aurora Avenue Seattle, Washington FILE RECEIVED MAy 0 1,1 1993 PERMIT COUNTER North,.#143 98133 FILE Qc May 3, 1993 subject: site observations and Recommendations Fill Placed West of Existing Residence 20602 86th Place West .Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Long: JN 93146 At your request, on April 30, 1993, we visited the site -of your existing residence located at 20602 - 86th Place West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of our visit was to observe the existing site conditions, including. the fill placed west of the res-idence, and provide retaining wall design criteria as well as maximum fill slope incli'nation recommendations. The recommendations and conclusions presented in this letter are based on the conditions observed duri.ng our site visit and our past experience in the vicinity. No subsurface explorations were conducted on the site for the preparation of this letter. The site is a rectangular -shaped parcel, located on the west side of 86th' Place West in Edmonds, and is currently developed with a one-story, single-family residence constructed in the eastern portion of the site. A gravel driveway extends from 86th Place West to the residence and a small carport has been attached to the west side of the residence. The western portion of the site's surface is currently bare earth and has been altered by the addition of up to approximately 15 feet of fill. Based on our conversations with Mr. Long, we understand that the fill was placed last spring and summer by a earthwork contractor working in the area. Native vegetation on the neighboring properties consists of grasses and weeds with mature fir and deciduous trees. The silty, gravelly, sand fill placed west of the residence is level for approximately.50 feet before sloping downward to the west at.an approximate inclination of 50 to 70 percent. The toe of the fill. slope is approximately 10 to 15 f et inside the western property boundary. A 5-foot"wi-de, e ncrete footing has been constructed near the toe of . the c 7 Robert Long May 3, 1993 JN 93146 Page 2 fill slope in preparation for a concrete retaining wall. we observed some erosion of the fill slope's surface soils and tension cracks near the top of the fill slope. We did not observe any evidence of deep-seated instability of the fill placed west of the residence. Based on our observations of the slopes on the adjacent properties to the north and south of the subject site, it appears that the fill was placed on a moderate (.20 to 25 percent inclination),*west-facing slope which extends west from 86th Place West to the western property boundary. Below the property, the ground surface slopes gently (less than 10 percent inclination) to the west. No indications of deep-seated, slope instability were noted on the existing, native slope observed on the adjacent properties. We hand -excavated a hole at the base of the fill near the existing concrete footing to a depth of approximately 3 feet. The hand excavation encountered approximately 18 inches of * loose, silty, gravelly sand overlying medium - dense, silty, gravell'y sand (glacial till). The existing footing appeared' to be constructed on the medium -dense, native soils. Based on our past experience in the vicinity of the site, we anticipate the subsurface conditions consist of weathered soils overlying dense glacial till. CONCLUSIONS it is our opinion that the core of the fill placed west of the existing residence is stable. However, at the current inclination of approximately 1_5:1 (Horizontal :Vertical ) , near -surface debris flows on the fill slope are possible, especially during periods of rainfall. The tension cracks noted near the top of the fill slope are indications of this possibility. Therefore, we recommend that the fill slope be laid back at a permanent maximum inclination of 2:1 (H:V) extending continuously from the toe to the top of the fill. ,If a retaining wall is constructed at the toe of the slope, the final fill slope inclination behind the wall should also not exceed a 2:1 (H:V) inclination,measured from the top of the wall to the top of the slope. See the following subsection entitled RETAINING WALL DESIGN CRITERIA for our recommendations on the design of wretaining wall at the toe of the slope. After fina.1 site grading has been performed, the permanently exposed fill slope should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the GEOTECH-CONSULTANTS, INC. -0 i 0 Robert Long May 3, 1993 JN 93146 Page 3 stability of the surficial layer of soil. If the vegetation is not firmly established by the beginning of the wet season next fall, we recommend that the exposed slope be covered with plastic or straw and that a filter fabric fence be installed around the toe of the fill slope. 1 Z4_26 Jul I a I Z mn-, Im uti a" For a concrete retaining wall placed on the existing footing at the toe of the slope, the wall may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of three thousand (3,000) pounds per square foot (psf). A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short- term wind or seismic loads. The retaining wall should be designed to resist an active soil pressure equal to that exerted by an equivalent fluid having a unit weight of fifty (50) pcf. This -active pressure includes a s-lope surchar e of.fifteen (15) pcf to account for the maximum 2:1 (H:V3 fill' slope behind the wall. Lateral movement of the wall will be resisted by friction b ' etween the wall's foundations and the bearing soils and by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the wall's foundation. For the latter condition, the foundations must either be poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or level structural fill must be placed around the outside of the foundation. The following recommended design parameters are for walls less than eight (8) feet in height which restrain level backfill: Desi gn Parameter Value Passive Earth'Pressure 350 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 130 pcf Where: 1) Pcf is pounds per cubic foot 2) Passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. -1 0 0 Robert Long JN 93146 May 3, 1993 Page 4 The passive pressure given is appropriate only for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of the retaining wall. An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. we recommend using a factor of safety of at least.1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharge loads will be placed above the walls. if these conditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind the wall within a distance equal to the height of the w*all, unless the wall is designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. Placement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should be accomplished with hand -operated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind the retaining wall should be free -draining structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than five (5) percent silt or clay particles and have no particles greater than four (4) -inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Due to their high silt content, if the on -site fill soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Miradrain or Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining wall. The drainage composite should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. The backfill should be compacted to a minimum_density of 90 percent of a Modified Proctor (ASTM 1557 78). The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for the retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top foot to eighteen inches of the backfill should consist of a relatively impermeable soi 1 or topsoi 1 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0 11 Robert Long JN 93146 May 3, 1993 Page 5 I N;T111 I � EVVI-20LODA �" A Ab We recommend that a footing drain be placed at the base of the retaini,ng wall. This drain should be surrounded by at least six (6) inches of one -inch -minus washed rock wrapped in non -woven geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At the highest point, the perforated pipe invert should be at least as, low as the bottom of the footing, and it should be sloped for drainage. IN 01 a 12 Lei � 111 _11110:11 :412 IRTI it is recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the final design. and specifications to verify that the earthwork and retaining wall recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and project speci f i cati ons. It is also recommended that Geotech Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction of the wall. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our observations, to evaluate whether earthwork and.retaining wall construction activities comply with the intent of contract plans and specifications, and to provide recommendations for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work will not include supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Robert Long JN 93146. May 3, 1993 Page 6 Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this letter, or if we can be of further assistance in this matter. Si ncerel y, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Burton R. Holt, P.E. Geotechnical Engineer F-XPIPZS 8 1-17 '13 James R. Fin -ley, Jr., P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. STREET FI& CITY OF EDMONDS 250 STH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-3202 RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Installation of 3 foot retaining wall and grading of approximately 1,000 cubic yards. (City of Edmonds Building Plan Check No. 93-52). Proponent: Robert Long Location of proposal, including street address if any: 20602 86th Place West, Edmonds, Washington Lead agency: CITY OF EDMONDS The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement -is not required under RCW 43.21.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agenc y. This information is available to the public on request. XX There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by .1994. Responsible Official: Ann Bullis Position/Title: Code Enforcment Officer, Department of Community Services - Planning Division Phone: 771-0220 � Address: City of Edmonds, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Rob Chave, Community Services Director, at 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, no later than 'Z A4 1994 by filing a written appeal citing the reasons. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on 199i, at the Edmonds Public Library, Edmonds Community Services Building, and the Edmonds Post Office. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies on the reverse side of this form, along with a copy of the Checklist. Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Department of Ecology XX Robert Long (Applicant) Environmental Review Section 20602 86th Place West P.O. Box 47703 Edmonds, WA 98026 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Attachments: Critical Areas Determination # CA-93-68 Environmental Checklist PC: Building Plan Check No. 93-52 SEPA Notebook Page 1 of 2 r� E MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION 250 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 TO: BUILDING DEPT. PLAN CBECK NO. 93-52 FROM: Ann Bullis, Planning Division DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1994 SUBJECT:' ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMNATION FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 20602 86TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS, WASF[INGTON I have had the opportunity to review the environmental checklist, and Critical Areas Determination, a copy of which are filed in the official file for this permit. Based on my review of all available information and adopted policies of the City, I recommend that a determination of nonsignificance, be issued. Attachments PC: FILE NO. 93-52 Page 2 of 2 REGARDING: 20602 = 86th Place West 41a/_0�900 (address) R E C 0 R D 0 F C 0 N T A C T S DATE NAME, PHONE NO., & COMMENTS ADDRESS of CALLER 5/l/74 5/20/74 is 6/5/74 7/24/74 2/5/76 2/13/76 2/25/76 3/2/76 3/10/76 3/19/76 ACTION TAKEN Security Saveco Certified Letter No. 406332 sent Letter received. requiring hook-up within 60 days. Received letter from Security Savesco. Letter mailed to Craig Harrold. Home is now owned by Craig Harrold, 191 Greenstone Drive,, Kamloops, B.C. Canada. Former owner Mr. Dick Akroyd is taking Referred to Engr. care of sewer connection for Mr. Harrold Says house is lower than road grade and wants to know if connection can be made. Renter - Herb Finnigan. Security Savesco also called re status of sewer connection. Mr. Aykroyd called to see why Engr. Has not been field checked yet. decision was taking so long. Was told he would be notified of decision by mail. Received recommendation from Engr. stating connection is required. Craig Harrold Regist6re'd'L*etter-.-sent-(Org.-Cet.t#406737) requiring hook-up within 60 days Letter received. per Engineering's findings. Gentleman from Security Saveco came into office and talked with Jim. Assured us connection would be made within 60 days. Russ Johnson came into office to obtain sewer location. Russ Johnson obtained permit #5415. INITIALS TE TE 4% TE TE JT JT WI-11 � "i JT JT t 0 0 CITY of EDMONDS 200 Dayton Street - Edmonds, Washington 98020 - Telephone (206) 775-2525 Department of Public Works February 13, 1976 CERTIFIED MAIL14e106;737 Mr. or Mrs. Craig Harrold 191 Greenstone,Drive Kamloops, British Columbia Canada Dear Mr. or Mrs. Harrold: The matter of your sewer connection at 20602 - 86th Place S.W., Edmonds, Washington, has been investigated by the City of Edmonds Engineering Department and a conclusion has been formulated. Your house is within 200 feet of the City sewer main and is not below the sewer main elevation. Therefore, the City of Edmonds will still require connection of your property to the City sanitary sewer system. You are hereby instruct ' ed to make the necessary sewer connection within sixty (60) days from the date of this letter. *If the connection �is not completed within this time, water service to the subject property will be terminated as outlined in City Code 11.16.240. Requirements for obtaining a Side -Sewer Permit are a plot -plan drawing of the proposed connection, the legal description for the prop- erty, payment of connection fees and copies of all recorded easements (where applicable), and payment of the $3S Permit fee. Side -Sewer Permits may be obtained at the Public Works Department, 200 Dayton Street, Edmonds, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and S:00 p.m, Monday through Friday. Please phone Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superin- tendent, at 775-2525, extension 226, for any information or assistance you may desire. Sincerely, SIGNED J. HERB GILBO Director JBM: j t U CITY ENGINEER'S SEWER CONNECTION RECOMMENDATION Date February 3, 1976 Address of Property to be Connected 20602 86th Place W. Owner Name & Mailing Address Craig Harold (saTre as above) Legal Description: L.I.D. .161, Asses. No. 352 Recommendation: Findings: 1. House is within 200 ft of sewer 2. House can reach.sewer by gravity 3. Property was assessed for sewers Recmuendation: Uhder City Codes, this house mist.connect City E�hginee.r RECEIVED FE>'-Ork 1176 J^_', Pub . W s Uept. " 1 1 C) '-) 6 9 (206)- 62'4-0656- 2134-3rd Ave. e Seattle, Washington 98121 RECEIV ' JUN 2 6 1914 June 25, 1974 City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. John B. Mitchell, Water/Sewer Superintendent RE: 20602 - 86th Place West, Edmonds Dear Mr. Mitchell: As we discussed today, I request that you extend to July 31, 1974, the date for our compliance with the side sewer hook-up on the referenced property. When I received your letter dated May 1, 1974 allowing 60 days for compliance, I forwarded it to Mr. and Mrs. Craig Harrold in Canada as they had purchased the property from us in February. On or about June 4,1 learned that Mr. and Mrs. Harrold refused to pay for the installation. I have since proposed to them that we split the cost of this installation but I have, not heard from them. I Please advise me of your decision at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, SECURITY SAVESCO, INC Anthony J. I i ppsen, r. 'P M anager AJP: gm 8 5- 7� ) 914. 2134-3rd Ave May 17, 1974 City of Edmonds 200 Dayton Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 ATTENTION: Mr. J. Herb Gilbo, Director RE: 20602 - 86th Place West, Edmonds 3C-2492 Dear Mr. Gilbo: Thank you for your letter of May 1, 1974. Z-A (206),,6 �4-06r�o� Seattle, Washington 98121 1111�0�1'vleb NY The subject property was sold by this corporation to Mr. and Mrs. Craig Harrold on February 15, 1974. Accordingly, your instructions should be addressed to them. Their address is 191 Greenstone Drive, Kamloops, B. C., Canada. Sincerely, SECURITY SAVESCO, INC. Anthony J. Phil ippsen, Jr. Manager AJP: gm Enclosure --.REG1§TERED NO. ,,V5MARK P.R. Value Special Delivery Reg. F Retum Receip 0 $ t Hnd!��g Clh� Restricted D61iVery - $ POS t 0,AIR POSTMASTER, (By): MAUNG 'OFFICE FRO 74- —j! A TO—�. c. — — — — — — — — — — — - 1, — — L — — — — — — — — — Zl- �Vb I A L SER VIC. E 41 CASH RECEIPT RECEIVED I-wOm THE Sum OF FOR By (Signature and title) PS For- 1096 J... 1971 DATE Dollars, 100 �(11 , ?10,0, 976 *U.S. GOVFRNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1974-651/440 Register4ani'dii Letter r, E.v.1 edom,�a' d* mettre �n Lvn d 0"ecomma �w E 1-�ured- lnswed;,�Iamel 'Insured'vaiue' C Colis,avac i.,.v.� vale upd�cl�ree ol V.aleur declaree .0 �Ofrjce of mailliIg Bureaii#de�pq� 'Date:6f4poitinj.`Diie de de ,YI! -Dept. t ;.No:!,' (S7 Addressee-(Nat�ii or:Firm) Norn!oy ralson socialeAu deOffiataire.' Street and�No.. Rue et'No,,., U4. T. I a c-e-, a' Vd" ountry,1 lieu,'et Pays /A a 76" ..,T.his,receipt ffiuiCbe sigriedtbyith�*adq!esse�ofty aipersoh,authorized fii-do.so by,,: Po . stma I r virtueldf,the regu[6tions�of,,the�couritr�.'Ofr destinatim',orl' irtfiose'rigulkions;so� k�oNI4,offke�,, Ird provide by fhe,e lo�ee,of-tfie dMce:of destination,,'and�rettirned7b�y,,'�the fiiii��ill 'o esfinliLU6n,.--- M 0 'd lj"to"the4.f1 r..� 1�19 irect 0 We�d a ong.', l, 'C ;ls �oit et�;slgn�,�ar.11e*d�stinarahi ou par upe personne.),�autorisee,eti:i,ertis et al 0 ire U v e d ' 0 a f b 'o c y P Ce ' -Yj' do 13; des. reglemen JS.rduipays de de�rit�a�tipn;"ou;.si-ces',reglemetits'ite comportent,,Pdrl.'�gent r -Z d tbu eau e e Ur. dii�bureaudedbstination:,Wrfr7envoyepar:iepiemi, rqburrierdi�ectem' nt'�:Vexpedite 'a T, lie articl�irrieritioned above was duliAelivered. "T fDaii Z L 'in I, t jivr� 191�mvotminiion njr ci-dess us'a, er� d6nion n a ru ic of, th, 'royife'qf,theofflce' 7 IZ-'Sijitature-ofthe-adaressee :f:"`�-��[So�desflnatton'l lture,de,Vagenr du ;'-'E Sg. " t Ur 0 �,sig At umclit, distina6ire -4 —wde des' bur NO. POSTMAR K�.� ---------- OF iue Special Delivery $ urn $ C) Receipt Reg. Fe e _ J'Rlel Han ling Ri '�h r e $ e�;trictecl,e- f,;, Pqliv.ery,,.,P Post:a' -21 ge $ IL ._,rQSTlv1A5TEH (Ejy) 0 FROM MAI I i�!E ---- ------ .0 & ------ C\j CD .q:zt . RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30�4 (plus 421-09800 SECURITY SAVESCO 2134 3RD AVE 3C-2492 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON RETURN RECEIPT SERVICES PECIAL DELIVE PS Form Apr. 1971 3800 9,9101 TN_AL —SERVICES -F:O:R �AUDITION�ALFEES 1. bnows to Whom wid date delivered W it h delivery to addressee only ... 6 2. ShOWS to whom, date aild whore delivered .. 3 �ith delivery to addressee only ............ 8! VES"S" 11. .. — extra iFee requi . r . e 51 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ';--OR D I E (See other side) GPO: 10700-307-400 2" 71 Sl e. an 04�r-.� SENDER:.-Be:,suid fo k1s); .:I3Y-,CkCkED,' L C PLEASEJPU�NiSK �t,14VJCE(�)�; INDICATED_ ,.,d fo�,,.the;� s�'fvWe�"Y char g�e s; �q(j iti. Deliv r,,,�ONL'Y [!��:,Sfiowtaddre'ss� i�e . re fo addressm'. where -del d RECEIPTI e: I g qW Recii%�id.,"f'he,n6mbdred-oifiiit- desi0b d b I" be� filled: in),! ME4 �6DO-�SjE REGISTERED NO*. SIGNATURE.Oft Nd CERTIFIED N D ESS E'S E AF ANT', SIG 2 TNSURE& N 0'. Code) ?�I� WHERE DELI��EREP .(O?ilV if -r4ques�ed; wid'i . actude ZIP, UBC 310,9,1,2 SMOKE DETECTORS REQUMED THROUGHOUT- EXISTING RESIDENCE THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT REQUIRES UPGRADE OF SMOKE DETECTORS IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: * IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM. * CENTRALLY LOCATED IN HALLWAYS OR AREAS ACCESSING SLEEPING ROOMS. WHEN SLEEPING ROOMS ARE ON THE UPPER FLOOR, SMOIKE DETECTORS MUST BE INSTALLED NEAR STAIRWAYS. 0 MINIMUM OF ONE INSTALLED ON EACH FLOOI;� INCLUDING THE BASEMENT. GENERAL NOTES I . All materials and workmanship shall conform to the 1997 Building Code, and. all-. other governing laws., codes,. ordinances. and regulations of. County, State and Federal jurisdictions.. It is the contractors responsibility to bui[d in accordance with all applicable codes. 2. Notify. and consult with Architect if discrepancies are found between drawings an site conditions an/or building or zoning requirements prior to start of Work. Any consequences resulting. from. these discrepancies will be the Contractors sole responsibility and expense if Architect is not corysulte.d- before area in -question is constructed. 3. Unless otherwise noted, dimensions are to face of studs, face of foundation walls, centerline of columns, centerline of doors and windows. 4. Do not scale drawings. Use written dimensions. Where conflicts exist, notify the Architect immediately. .5. Where insta[lation.s include manufactured products, comply with -the manufacturers applicable instructions and recommendations for installation. Verify rough -in dimensions for equipment and provide buck -outs, backing and jacks as required. 6. Provide electrical outlets, lighting and similar as shown in plans and specification's and/or required by code. Verify- exactJocation with Owner. 7. Selection of interior and. exterior finishes to be verified with Owner. 01- STRUCTURAL NOTES 1. Desien. Criterla: Roof Live Load: 25 P5F SOIL.'s Ver Ceflin!a L-Ive Load: 10 PSF 'Zo Z003 F90H Floor Live Load: 40 FSF 7-jppe-rz- Za4AN ^f-7,ae" port Deck, Live Loed: 50 P5F % Wind: 20 PSF ALL '�007� SITE',00" Earthictuake. Zone 3 V /01.,/ '4Z It'le, 4WInA16* Soil 5earTne: 10-500 - PSF PEX SOILS F-F-po - 2. Extend all Footines clown to undisturbed soil or the specified stren!@th with a minimum of 10" below the adjacent grade. 3. Concrete shall reach a minimum 20 cla� streneth of 2,000 P51, with minimum of 5 sacks of cement per cubic �ard, and- maximum of ro eallons of water per sack for all structural concrete, includine foundations and slabs on erads. 4. Concrete- cover on reinforcin!a steel to be as follows (clear dimension) - non -exposed vertical faces- 10 vertical faces exposed to earth or weather 20 bot-tom, of footines: 3 fl slabs on 2rade (from top). 1 1/211 5. Unless otherwise noted, framine lumber to be furnished as follows: C'siline Joists: HEM-FIfR 02- Ra fters - HEM -FIR "I or DOUGLAS-FIR 412 Flo -or J"clist& DOUGLAS -FIf;R'*12 4 x 5eams: DOUGLA6-FIR 02, &'x-.-asams:: DOUGLAS-FIR #1 Posts: DOUGLA5-FIR *11 Studs, Fla tea,. M16-r,.- LI!2ht F�amfnj�j: HEM-FIR-*2- All.wood frame construct'lon shall conform to mlnTmum standards of U,13.c. .Nailine requirements to be in accordance with Table 23-I-Q of UB.t.. -1. Positive post/beam connections shall be provided to prevent UP -lift and. laterai. displacement.. - - E4 LL1 L T CD LW LOT LINE STAKES MUST BE IN PLACE AT TIME OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION 150.0, (P (P 9 4' -6-OW111111' —rr---7 E�4 M-ENT (E), DRI-VE NTO lk�v�E I 1 11 %;Ab 'AbO 40ft,5019 MOWOS I V ' I P0 9\s i AND SPLAOBLOCKS qxisn 12. (L#) �PZEAf;4, S�THAGK (E) F— i--T 0. F;Z� DRI�/E AY �E A _O�NOONEID (6�40W� tRA�H�b�' i(o Bi 51TE AT PROP05ED GARAGE SHALL 5E PREPARED 5Y REMOVE EXITNG 5 LOOSE SOIL -AND STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL 5E ADDED AS PER GEOTECH. REPORT- ATTACHED. XOW,01 241-�l 2 (o. 51 24.51 -IN L V - U I_ \) . < F.L. 190.01 501-111 (E) FRONT SETBACK 3WNER/CONTRACTOIR'iS RE-SPONSIR.E FOR EROSIONN AND D,`1dMA'G;E .STE PLAN NOPIN SCALE: 1' 20'-0' SITE ADDRES AREA CALCULATIONS 20&02 8(oth P1 West Propert� -Area Edmonds, Washineton c3002ro 15"150' SF OWNE David aaits�4- 20602 aroth Place West E.6monds, WA 'Ba02 (o I - Phone - 425-11a-aal"I SCOPE OF WofR< Construct a new attached earaes in Side 'rard of existine- residence. No Modifications to residence this permit. ZONE SF RS - 12 ResIdence SP Existin!@ Deck - 210 SF Existing O.H. ovr 15": 130 sf Total Exist Coveracie. 1.132(o �Q Proposed Garaele Covera!@e incl. O.H. ovr ta" 3(03 5F Proposed Total Lot Coverage 2,2aS 8F -TAX ASSESOR5 NUMBE Coverage 91c,: 14B5�-; f=larcel 11 _00544600000-0102 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (E-)-5L[)G ROOF OUTLINE (PRE IS5a Sp (E) DRIVE (PRE 11B11)" 540 5F EAST IE70' OF L(�>T 1. PLAT OF (E) DRI-VE (POST -IS-Tl)� 15f3i 6F PINE RIDEGE ACCORDING (E) PORCH (POST 11311): -254 5F 'TOPLATE.-THERE-OFIN-AZOL. PROPOSED GARAGE— ROOF. OUTLINE-- 44(o -5F 13 IN PLATE rorc> IN 5NOHOM15�4- CO..'WA5H. - I F_ rZ > ILI I Z1 ILI W LU[ I E I Oil OL I ED.. T _11+ DATUM POINT + 100 TOP OF SURF -ACE - STREET DRAIN LU _1 LW C) () Z < Z X LU e Uj 4b(a r# NfW IMfk9\A0LU APPROVED AS NOTED BY ENGINEERIRG R-ECEIVEC DEC 15 2003 PERMIT COUNTER 0 -RIQC-5:� ll��L-pl 0 61 �-�e V(C-",7 NC_W_P__H t4en 11394. zo 4_5 7 -, -ozx TH F"LAtr-v' 0 s 1 -2 ef " er WFISI-r 1�0595_(50 7' L A I h1i v AM Vetty Address fta I --- Census Traci -50h,()l LENDER DISCRETIONARY JSE Snahominh State WA Zip Code ___92_0 Sale Price S Lertal Descri tion - W_t_7__P_Lnv__Ai tine , E 150, of lot 7 -.-Yol 1-' Date mortgage Amount Yw;;(F0ccuPent_ LONGO Robert—wid TROPE,, Cari &Lmo lvlalfi_qftm� = 59 SaIePriceS Roft 2nd 08te 91 Sak N/A RTY RIGHTS APPRAISED MortgaM TYPe wan chatlies/concessions to be paid by selet S I 4,j oiscouni Points and OlhO Concessions 3.00 W-A i] � Paid by SdW S RE. Tares Tax ftr 19% HOA $!I i Lender/Clier""I I ��nefi ial-Wowhington /_ nwood,, CW*rninium (HUDNA) ReLNnr+. -Lonxr and C-sAri ."Prn miromis PUD Source Isiol NEIGHBORHOW ANALYSIS Good Avg. fak Pon- -.0CATIM LA Urban Suburbad=� R S 9A K PPRA SED IS 4, .NA, WLT UP - Employment 91ablilt Over 75% i 5 - 7 5% r', y ! . 9. X_ * WTH A Rog Stable R Convenivro to Emlkrmd MOPEATY VALUES ro Increasing. Stable ColKpeniewe,to Shopping �,f ... ovvjkm* convenience to Schools E. IEMAND/SUMY stfortage. In i 4ARXETING TW Under 3 Mos. f-xl 3.6 Adejuacy off Public Transportation 'RESENT LAND USE % LAND USE CHANGE PREDOMKA!t),,� SWvLE Mlftlf f"JSINQ Recreation Will" F1 1ino Family 86 Not Likely WCUPANCY PRO AGE Adequacy of Utilities 70,91 S (WO) (yrs) Compatlibility .4 Family 7 Likely owner 0 Protection from Beirimental Cond. idi-family 2 In process RiTenant F-1 L., F_ wnmerclal 2 To: vacant (0-5%) 8.0 no _51— Police & Fire Protection 0 DO EJ L 1) dustrial 0 Vmnt (over 5%) L Vnfed& Imm General Appearance of ftMt%S aftnt — I - 20.,Q - --3&2 1 to ma��, _EEL 3 wa..W.0"" 11 jit: Rate or the racial composition ol itte wighborhood am not considered relial fe appraisal facfm 1141ENTS: Subject located below Atreet, level an a ot*M indift to the West Let area = bw ixamportation available for school age, children - showin;t in Aocatei 19as than a five min-ut.& _%ain& Plant a. 2&-29 minute a to deDendinm on the traffic condt ngt 0 lowntown Z�ftonda less tl= tw (21 miles distant, AMMIM JoLlf X 150' x 104' x 15W Topwa^ Steer 8103;1 West, T 15600 eq ft Cam Lot No sin T"_ Classitication RFS/SGL 12000of Zoning Compliance Yes Shape Rectangular 44EST & BEST USE: Present Use You Other Use Drainage A:2Dears adeauate .:LITIES Public. Other SITE WROVEMENTS Type Publz* Private vow None 9tred Aspha Undsca0v Avera Curb/WW Amphalt gutter Drwm el Dirt- S&W* Noft Apparent Eawwls None noted nWry Sewer Street LWft Tole/Auto FEMA Flood Hazard *s* No x Altev None FEW Map/Z 163-0005D/Zonp X f I L-0 7 7 E�, H`7 00f2TH N%ST040 ^R_r09-*r ZIP 1-0.0 L 171,0's jt� � 5 L E \/A71 0 t*-.4 pipe e-or4-r,ou,Pv,c> e? -re%wwAriDq elt 7 dW411 l(leg 7YV, A4 /'D 2-1 7�11 P//// Mpe 11v 1� ZONING __Gz SEPA RX42 - SETBACKS k2 LCITCOVERAGE HEIGHT QgLg WETBAR STATEMEN GUEST HOUSE STKf EMENT FLOOD AREA el OTHER __7 APPROVED - DATE CITY OF EDMONDS - BLDG. DEPT —Building Official v v J A tl 3 PERvIT H E F�0 LO l:�—, P--. Ed:�� 1 5) E �2 e-rA 1 �-4 1 �� 6 L L.. tzNN P P 17- 1 Or-4 — F= PM e::�� P:5 0A$.. Ad 03-11M 7, 3 7,1 �28 Z0967�1