Loading...
20916 76TH AVE W.pdfF� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. BRUCE CRAMER BA IL-1-69 21io.prifb A— m w --I OF BOARD OF' APPEAIS KMiING JANUARY 30, 1969 BA-1-69 PRESENT: Doti Finnigan Sam Ewing Harry Skinner Allan Albers Donald Decker Fire Chief Cooper, ex-officio Building Official Slabaugh, ex-officio Meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M.,by W. J. Slabaugh,.Puilding OfAcial. First order of business was the nomination of:'a chairman since Dan Tuson was no longer a member of the board. Motion by Finnigan and seconded by Skinner that Sam Ewing ser4as chairman., Motion carried. 4 81abaugb then introduced the two new members Albers and Decker� He then introduced Bruce Cramer, the applicant, and George Addicott who attended the meeting with Cramer. At this time Chairman Ewing asked that the applicant make his request tolthe board members. Cramer felt that since, thisapartmedt building was of 'the Townhouse type and each set of stairs served only.one family that it should be considered more as an 'IT" occupancy. An 'IT" occupancy is a single family dwelling 'and does Pot need to have this fire protection although it is asked for'in a single family dwelling by the department and the contractors comply with this request. it was' pointed out that there were 20 units concerned with 20 hot water heaters. j; felt that Cramer's appeal was legitimate and reasonable but did not went to.6et a precedence on this matter. It was pointed out that each case is a j sep are e case. t Tt,,Was asked that the City Approved Plans be presented andthe Building Official biought these to the conference room. The drawing showing'the stair section was shown and found to have been marked with the fire protection but just.failed t&:be installed by the dry wall contractor. Different ways were discussed in order that this protection might'�be.provided without entirely removing the hot water heaters. Skinner made a motion that the request be denied,` d' ; � ' an t at protection be�.made, "in area dri question. This protectionj was to be,worked out1bet'�e6n'jhe1BalIJifie Z 0 i M M C M 0 0 80 C M M z ID -4 C — > Z 01 n M M (j) In r- C M M 0 Z r- .4m 50 z --A i I CD z 0 4 �_Official and Cramer. Decker seconded I the motiowand carried wit . h,all4voting 0 -yes e�cept Finnigan. M at on to,,adjourn by Finnigan'and seconddhy Skinner and meetingadjourn4d'atl 8:30 P.M. 64� FILE NO. CITY OF EDMONDS APPLICATION TO BOARD OF APPEALS DATE EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE RECIT NO. - (Reference: "01 UBC) FEE V�IeKj A -0 PLICANT: )�-,11-0- CP--416,Z.- ADDRESS: 12-'t7D- AP Wft. JU,'-: PHONE: '?2-2---31Z-z1 OWNER: PHONE: ADDRESS: 7f, LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS): 0 76 t4e -wj LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lo -r (�ulLows�At,e- -PROPERTY Z Use Zone: 'n' Fire Zone 7�77- 0 M Kroll Map No._ E Type of Construction Required VARIANCE REQUESTED: —�o rjo-r ipa —c) A-,:s77w 1. A4vle M M 0 0 C SPECIFIC PROVISION Or CODE INVOLVED: (S ction 3305-Li e M M Z -7 0 C: > V STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR REQUEST; I A) r o ra- 0,01, 19Q1;0 r :� 0) 0 M ..q � i I x ic M 0 0 M Cn M 0 z -4 SKETCH: Show below or attach plot plan, showing all dimensions, buildings (existing ;U and proposed), setbacks, and streets. Include vicinity sketch of the area with property shaded in per Example shown on reverse side. Indicate North on both sketches.) z z 0 C2 0 M `9 C) A V �T EXAMPLE Vicinitv Sketch Or. z �lf 0 C M Z 0 "n mm, . .... ...... ... 0- r o M 0 z z 0 0 CITY Or EDMONDS APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING CODE Page 2 STATE OF WASHINGTO14 ss. COUNTY OF OHOMISH applicant for the variance set forth herein, do swear that I have prepared and read the foregoing statements; that the same are true and correct; and that I have signed this instrument as a free and voluntary act for the purposes set forth herein. DATED this day o SUBSCRIBED AND SNOW TO before me this ;23��L day of 196 K z ARTmPUE1IC in and,ror S_&homish County, R1 �n residing in 1�'a`shington, M C Record of Findings of Fact by Board of Appeals M 0 0 0 0 C The Board of Appeals for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of -from M BRUCE CRAMER F ile No. BA-1-69 request for V7ariance the M requirements of the Building Code as described therein, t he following: C= 1. That: Section 3305-L be waived. 0 -n M M 0 or M co M 0 z 2." T6refore,.on motion by er second by Dona d Decker ing spa 'the�request for variance is DeniM=J__' subject to the followi cial conditions: Fire protection is required. Arrangements to be worked out to the satisfaction of M > the Building Department. z z 1969 Decision shall be effective on 2 --- (DatW) M Dated January 23. 1969 Chairman, Board of Appeals DATA Date of Application January 23, 1969 Board Members Present at Hearing: on E�' W. J. Slabaugh,.ex-off cio Date of Hearing_, Janm_ry 23 190 SWm inig Jack Co2pert ex-officia Harry Skinner Time of Hearing 7:30 P-M- Allan Albers one ec er Present for Applicant:_ --Bruce Cramer -Secretary, Board of Appeals