The URL can be used to link to this page

20919 76TH AVE W.PDF111111111111 6308 20919 76TH AVE W NEW BZ ARBOR.TAE IRZ1.21. I'E 'R G., - - - - - - - EXISTING DRIVEWAY PAVED - - - - - - - - - - - - -- PARKING, T EX TING FENCE PARKING I ..I.T N. PLANTING COVE ED IARIIN.. POR.R. I-T 1& .1 BED PARKING 2 - - - - - - - - - - PARKINGI EXISTING PARKING 3 PLAY AREA EXISTING PARKING >_ LOT PARKING. LLJ PI-ANTING BED PARK7 - - - - - - - - - - - - z U) P i EXISTING STRUCTURE (n > 11. PLAN �NG I PARKING 10 57< < 14 BED LLI (L T v Lt - - - - - - - Pt-ANTING PARKINGII EXISTING STRUCTURE 26� lw�- JINTZI�Nl DISABI.ED PARKING -OF le CURB- 12 I CUT T Z. I? aid ACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ROUTE 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74-11 - - - - - - - - - - - OWNERICON11"FiAolo lf*u"'r-i I'S RESPONSIBLE APPMOVED AS NOTED FOR EROSION GONTROL AND DAMAGE —BY QqGjNEERING RE" f v v I SITE PLAN Date: FEB '0 8 204 It 1-011 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: DEVELOPMENT SERVICIfS CTF A(7 = 1 CITY OF EDMONDS SCALE: 1 /8 . BUILT IN 1953: HOUSE - 1847 SF o'� LEGAL: - AURORA HOMESITES BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 12 GARAGE - 1064 SN PARCELM 00380400001200 One. etbi Corner�__F]Ag OWNER: JENNIFER GIFFORD DRIVEWAY - 44111 SF Is L%w Actijai ADDRESS: 20919 76TH AVE W BUILT IN 1985: PARKING (EAST) - 4907 �rgd t I S !E;- 5- EDMONDS, WA 98026 BUILT IN 2015.: ADDITION - 385 SF Froi _u'/ —J-QT AREA: 15,300 SQUARE FEET Si ;e s 10 10 LOT COVERAGE: 2985 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED: OFFICE - 112 SF COVERAGE PERCENT: 20% AP ROVED BY PLANNI�q 7� jl!� �ht 0.1 Mtt I . rlLt PARKING SPACES REOT, Applicant shall repairtrepisce all damage tO or front,9ge improvements in City uvities is OTDC17T 1171117 I'M ING ICES PROPOSED' right-of-w-aypej. C.',,�,y standalds that cau-sad or 0 cum during tha Permitted project. I nLL i r I L C. vvs NEIAf ARBORWAE (5) IDA L `�-=tt��TINGAR;51TAE PYRAMIDALIS Off 0ja 8ARF If 'DOC. I" Irp ell w Or PARKING4 42 EXISTING DRIVEWAY IS, UR. CUT —2T� PAVED �—wV 21� MIN. r - -- - - - - - - -- r - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - EXISTING FENCE IARKINGI PLANTIRG STRIP NO PLANT TO BE TALLER 9 T"A Y� EVERGREEN BUSHES a APPRXZ� ONCE TER EXISTING C� ED PLANTING i PARKING. 2S TOTAVPILANTS PORCH ED I b I - - - - - - - - - - - - - W� TALL I t P.P. G�Golv 1 EXISTING PARKING I PLAY AREA EXISTING PARKING 0 LOT PARKING 8 EXI..KTING EXISTING TREE 0 D. R % N DE TING P I& t TO BE REI LANTIN C 'ED -4-1 ARQ141 _j Scanned: PARKING - w NOTE: NEVV RAMP GOES NOT FALL !,2 EXISTING STRUCTURE C/) UNDER THIS PERMIT. NEED U OCCUPAN YLOAD ADDITIONAL PERMIT FOR AR, PLANTING M CHILDREN AND 5 ADULTS CHANGES M To 'ED (ept NEV RAMP AGE EXISTING PE M� MAIN BUILDING. PARKING 10 L-L71 IL—Y.1 j ACCESSIBI. 4 ROUTE �R�P.TMG 101 PARKING 11 w CIRI 2S-T IV - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLANT LEGEND T . . . . . EXISTING DRIVEWAY D ABLEDPARKING PARKING 12 CUT ARBORV. ARBORVITAE PYRAMIDALIS —KINGIHALICONFOR"T-0 EXISTING STRUCTURE A, PAVED, 1-2— 111—N 12.3 RHODOD, RHODODENDRON OCCUPANC�LOAD: EVERGA. EVERGREEN BUSH CONFOR 10 CHILDREN AND 2 AE0ULTS SIG M TO ICC A117.I-2009SECnONS( - — - — - — - — - — - AS WAVC0 ... N6.. THE ROOF EA�OVERHANG SHALL NOT EXTEND ANY re OWNE111CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLOSER THAN 2C TO PROPERTY LINE PER IBC TABLE 7051 EXISTING ROOF EA�OVERHANG WLL BE CUT TO BE NO Ah. ERnpunpj rnwanL nu DRA-INAU: CLOSER THAN 2eIN ORDER TO COMPLY �N 113C TABLE — 2. APPROVED BY PLA NG y y y y SITE PLAN A(7 C,=,� IRA N — SURFACE: ....PERVIOUS ;4 SCALE: 1 /8"=V-011 i� 7 BUILT IN 1953: HOUSE - 1847 SF LEGAL AURORA HOMESITES BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 12 GARAGE - 1064 SF o e 5- Comer Flag 2ARCEL#: 00380400001200 .. DRIVEWAY - 4411 SF e acts 'Required __ACtUal OWNER: JENNIFER GIFFORD B910 1985: ADDRESS: 20919 76TH AVE W CS "i T(O APPROVED BY EN ANE" PARKING (EAST) - 4907 SF Front S 'des EDMONDS, WA 98026 I 0_�j_ 5 .3 PROPOSED: _:�L LOT AREA: 15,300 SQUARE FEET ADDITION - 385 SF IR ear L4 OVERAGE: 2873 SQUARE FEE1(:�;L;1<L__ LOT C 0-�herl L-OT COVERAGE PERCENT: 19% na!Nn L-0-L]. wr- iT Height /Ij xos To: From: Date: Subject. CITY OF EDMONDS 1215 1h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 * Fax: 425.771.0221 * Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 9 PLANNING DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Street file for 20919 76 th Avenue West Sean Conrad, AICP, Associate Planner February 24, 2016 Staff Decision for BLD20160154 Project Proposal The owner of the preschool is requesting to construct a small detached building (8' x 14') which will serve as an office for the preschool. The office will be located on the south side of the existing building on the property. Property Owner Jennifer Gifford 2091976 th Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 Design Review Process As part of the City's review of the building permit referenced above, design review is required pursuant to ECDC 20.10. The project is located in the Multi -Family Residential (RM-1.5) zone. The current use of the property as a preschool and the intended use of the building as a detached office require the building to be reviewed for compliance with policies contained in the specific section of the Comprehensive Plan addressing the mixed use commercial land use designation. Since the shed is exempt from SEPA review, design will be conducted by staff as a Type I decision. Page 1 of 3 Figure 1: View of the proposed location of the office building. The building will be located behind the fence. Findings & Conclusions 1. Scope. According to ECDC 20.10.020, design review is intended to apply to all development including any improvement to real property open to exterior view, including but not limited to buildings, structures, fixtures, landscaping, site screening, signs, and parking lots. The design review is focused on site design and layout for the proposed office building. . 2. Environment. The project is exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3) because the office building is less than 4,000 square feet in size. 3. ECDC 16.30 RM Zone Compliance. Site Development Standards (ECDC 16.30.030). The office building is proposed on the south side of the property. At this location the building will meet the minimum 10-foot side yard setback from the south property boundary. The maximum height allowed for detached accessory structures is 15 feet. The office building will be just under 10 feet. Page 2 of 3 The RM zoning districts allow a maximum lot coverage of 45%. With the office building in place the lot coverage will be 22%, well below the maximum allowable. 4. Comprehensive Plan. The site is designated Mixed Use Commercial on the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Map. The proposed project shows an effort towards the following Comprehensive Plan design objective: B.2.c. General Design Policies. B.2.c.i The nonstructural elements of the building (such as decks, lights, rails, doors, windows and window easements, materials, textures and colors) should be coordinated to carry out a unified design concept. The proposed office building includes both horizontal and vertical siding, a pitched roof and windows on three sides of the building. The owner intends to paint the office building to match the existing buildings on the property. With the use of similar siding materials and paint colors, the proposed office building meets the intent of the above general design policy. Decision Staff finds that the proposal is consistent with site development standards in ECDC 16.30 and the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the design of the office building in permit BLD20160154 is APPROVED. I have reviewed the application for compliance with the Edmonds Community Development Code. February 24, 2016 Sean Conrad Appeols Date Design review decisions by staff are only appealable to the extent that the applicable building permit or development approval is an appealable decision under the provisions of the ECDC. Design review by staff is not in itself an appealable decision. Page 3 of 3 EXISTING ARBORWAE PYRAMIDALIS PYRMIDALIS - - - - - - - - - - 10.0 C. 7,, EXISTING DRIVEWAY 6 1, PARKING 4 PARKIN. 4 PAVED r - - - - - - - - T EXISTING FENCE PARKING 5 PARKING I n I I EMSTNG i COVERED PLANTINGi PORCM BED PARKING 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . b ' ; PARKING 6 EXISTING PARKING 7 PARKING 3 PLAY AREA EXISTING PARKING EXISTING LOT PARKING 6 DECK LU > PLAN I NG BED - - - - - - - - - - - - - i�v - - - - - - - - - - - - PARKING 9 z F- LLj EXISTING STRUCTURE i Ln > x < LLI CL PI-ANTING ED r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T r 77 PARKING 10 PI-ANTING PARKI GII oil EXISTING STRUCTURE 21 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DISABLED PARKING CUR& CUT PARKING 12 I? L A ...... ACCESSIBLE R.UTC R..TE - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - RECEP'g D SITE PLAN FEB 0 8 20A IMPERVIOUSSURFACE: DEVELOPMENTI SERVICJ'S, CTF SCALE:1/8"=l' -011 HOUSE 1847 SF CRY OF EDMOND BUILT IN 1953': - LEGAL: AURORA HOMESITES BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 12 GARAGE - 1064 SF done PARCEL#: 00380400001200 comer Fig& OWNER: JENNIFER GIFFORD DRIVEWAY - 4411 SF ietba ks t R 're ADDRESS: 20919 76TH AVE W EDMONDS, WA 98026 BUILT IN 1985: PARKING (EAST) - 4907 BUILT IN 2015: ADDITION - 385 SF SF r oll t AREA: 15,300 SQUARE FEET Sid( s —I-QT LOT COVERAGE: 2985 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED: OFFICE - 112 SF Rear LOT COVERAGE PERCENT: 20% MF- gas .1 ro Other '�Height - ---------- N oil vIENTII.ATI 20SFODOR HEAT: ELECTRIC BASEBOARD [ �INEW FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /411=1 1-011 NOTES CODE M121BCFORARCHITECTU�AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN SOIL BEARING PRESSURE: 2M UBS STR rVRALDESIGNCATEGORY:02 BASIC WIND SPEED 85 MPH ROOF SNOW LOAD 25 PSF WALLS -2.@IrOC,HtMFIR�ONALLBEARING ULS -Y,'PLYWOODO N.LWALLSWUNAILS GTOC.WAU-S PERIMETER ITOC. FIELD ROOF .)�- PLYWOOD Wl " NAILS 0 S' 0 C PERIMETER Ir 0 C , FIELD - Hl 0 EA. END OF TRUSSES HEADERS - ALL HEADERS TO BE BUILT WTH R-10 INSUL 10 "CTES WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING —DOWS P INT COLOR TO MATCH EMSTING - DARK GRAY WITH WHTFE TRIM rA=— ".A ]TEUNDEZ WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ;L-1--i NORTH ELEVATION ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1 /419=1 1-011 C) Lu 0 LL, cc) a) z L>L 1 0 cz, (D 0 0 0) W LL 0 LL 04 0 PLANNING I DATA =FILE New Commercial. / Multi -Family Projects Na,e::�2 (r Cc Date. Site Address: Plan Check #: BLD - Project Description:T C seer_, Use(s) Proposed: All wed Use- (9�1 NO) CUP File Number: PLO -z'o I To Allow What Uses: �J Legal Nonconforming Land Use Determination Issued: (YES Reduce . d I Site Plan Provided;� �E/ NO) Zoning: r Map Page: Comp Plan Designation:ull,�-_t/14_iy q,� AJJ�� Corner Lot: (YES Flag Lot (YES 41�O� AD13 File Number (date waived): Lot Area: 15, 2-,-(c( si Plans Mat6h ADB Approved: (YES I NO) Shoreline Required: (YES 16M�� Critical Areas Determination #: 2_c�, k-��O(!DS-7 El Study Required tg,Waiver SEPA Determination: R-Exempt El Needed (for sites with 500 cubic yards of grading or within 200 feet of Puget Sound or Lake Ballinger. Requires: (1) Fee, (2) Environmental Checklist, and (3) APO List with notarized form). Required Setbacks Street: Side: Side: Rear: Actual Setbacks Street:. S-7 r Side: . �/ Rear: Lot Cov6rage/FAR Required: Lot Coverage/FAR Provided: (9 'I'o _-�, <-- 5 = -21 b-7 s-f Lot Coverage/FAR Calculations: Building Height r,3 /A Datum Point- Datum Elevation - Maximum Height: Actual Height: < Subdivision: Lot Aggregation Required: t_J 0 Landscaping Landscaping Matches ADB Approved: Landscaping Bid Provided: (YES / NO) Bond Amount (1 0(r/o Bid): Plan Review By: PLANNING DATA FIL�E New Commercial / Multi -Family Projects Commercial Parking Analysis Business Name Typ e/Use Parking Ratio Tenant Area Required Parking _:�f V- Total Parking Required. - Total Parking Provided.- Mulfi�famflyParking Anal is # Bedrooms per Dwelling Unit Parking Ratio # Units Required Parking Studio 1.2/D.U. I Bedroom 1.5/D.U. 2 Bedrooms 1.8/D.U. 3 + Bedrooms 2-0/D-U. Total Parking Required. - Total Parking Provided.- L-) �, A Plan Review By: City of Edmonds STREET FILE. Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Name : & k , 4t, P, I Me,; Street/Maili Address dity State Zip Telephone:2-c% 22-9 OV ED4 Al R F B SEP 10 2015 �J � kw.: PAWZ Tr__ = W VA I U a Applicant Contact Person: %knv-% NaAe— izL41 �R Ate 6kd Street/Mailing Address City St�te Zip Telephone: M� 2X0 Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Telephone: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS Contact Name E-mail: Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete 1. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) 11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION LIJL Ajez a. Location -Street address: xP R 7 (Attach a vicinity map and site plan.) b. Specify existing land use: c. Specify proposed type and size of development: I '4 v . Z753 X_ CT-. 04 <,-F--- -_ o Of residential ulnl�v andlor squarefootage of building) DS Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page I of 5 d. Date construction will begin and be completed: I/Ito e. Define proposed access locations: �n) -RreVwmlt, 12 SIAJ et r4D - Ar�4 I f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 2. TRIP GENERATION, Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed -by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation' Table: Land Use PM Peak -Hour Trips Daily (ADT) IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 - E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110 - E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of LO I S I [Delays] Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach stripingplan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): 1 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted bythe project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, in cluding turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments I must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project 1 Without Project .1 b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records I Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheel Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures ' and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall- be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82. 1'20, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECDC 18.82.130. CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior,,use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted'prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used. Per Unit ITE Land Use Category Fee Rate New Use $ Prior Use CARFMC� $ X Units in square feet, # of dwelling,, vfp, etc. A r-'�w Fee $ $ --� I ZS' New Use Fee: $ 7 -5ZI. q9- - Prior Use Fee: $ or $ q El NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in Per Unit square feet, ITE Land.Use Category Fee Rate of dwelling, vfp, etc. Few Use $ X El OTHER Fee I MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION: S INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ consultant fee) $- TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval bate No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on &24110 E82 - Traffic Inipact .4 nalysis Worksheet Page 15 of 5 City'of Edmonds nUMM, 10 MEt. Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Name 2D911 14 Ate, W-eii:4� Street/Maili Addre City State Zip Telephone: !2rlY--,, 22-4 ZSI; Applicant Contact Person: Na e IELe Street/Mailing Address city State Zip Telephone: 2� :715 Z(O Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Telephone: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS Contact Name E-mail: Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) 11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections L PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: 2m ig —179NILE) Aez IA/ ttach a vicinity map and site plan) b. Specify existing land use: c. Specify proposed type and size of develop ent: c-F--. 174. 4,SF (# of residential u andlor squarefootage of building) Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page I of 5 d. Date construction will begin a I nd-be completed: �404: to IAO e. Define proposed access locations: SAAJ f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress, locations: -2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportati on Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Land, Use Daily (ADT) IN Trips OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6124110, E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersection s to be evaluated shall be determined by the City ofEdmonds -Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of I LOS Delays Land Use c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department I . Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES I I Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing-ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and, directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the prbject has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summariie Level of Service Analysis below and'attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each.ai-terial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations. LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variation's to standard analysis default values and justifications: 1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet , Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from.the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in-ECDC 18.82.130. 11 CHANGE IN USE Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee, shall be used. ITE . Land Use Category Per Unit Fee Rate New Use $ X Prior Use $ X Units in square feet, # of dwelling, vfp, etc. 6 r- Ns - Fee IM12 .New Use Fee: $ v�� 7 q. Prior Use F I ee: $ $ 2-S- 21. q5 11 NEW DEVELOPMENT Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet, Fee Rate of dwelling, vfp, etc. Few Use $ X I 0 OTHER f INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ consultant fee) TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE $ 4,, - 4o (I City of ��nds, Engineering Division Approval Date No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative. Revised on d124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 City of Edmonds Site Classification Page 1 of 2 OV Worksheet OWEL JUL 13 2015 Op' C'NOF C c. I iW1 CT 911 ; �4041��V,31_ The project's Site Classificati6h win—ictate the specific stormwater management requirements applicable to your site. Completing this worksheet will help determine the amount of regulated impervious surface and whether your project falls into the classification of a Small Site - (Category I or Category 2), or a Minor Site. Please reference the Glossm (pp. 10- 11), Figures D and E, (pp. 8-9), and Examples (pp. 11-12), to assist with completion of this worksheet. 1) 1 . s Permeable Pavement' Proposed For Use on this Site? El Yes Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 5.1 ' 9 If YES, the subject area is to be considered impervious for initial site classification purposes. Include total permeable pavement area in the calculation of Non -Regulated, Replaced and/or New impervious surface areas in the table below. 2) Determine the Amount and Type of Existing & Proposed Impervious Surface for the Site Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 2 and Fig. C Line 1: Identify the Non -Regulated Impervious Surface Area. Line 2: Identify the Replaced Impervious Surface Area, dividing the total between Exempt and Regulated; either or both may be zero. Note: For project classification purposes, Replaced Impervious may only be considered exempt under certain conditions. Refer to the Glossary and Figure D. Line 3: Identify the New Impervious Surface Area for your project. All impervious areas created post -July 7, 1977 or after the date of annexation into the City are regulated & should be included in this total unless they can be categorized separately as a Replaced -Regulated area. Line 4: Enter the sum of the total Replaced -Regulated plus the total New impervious areas. Line 5: Identify the total area currently mitigated by an existing city-approyed stormwater management system. Line 6: Enter the sum of the value in Line 4 less the value in Line 5 to identify the total Regulated area in which stormwater controls have not yet been applied. Line 7: Identify the total area proposed to be mitigated through the use of Low Impact Development Techniques. Line 8: Identify the total area proposed to be mitigated through conventional Stormwater Management Techniques. ** Provide a.copy of the following table on the drainage plan sheet for the proposed project ** Line Type Area (square feet) 1. Non -Regulated Exempt Regulated 2. Replaced + 3. 4. New (Post 1977) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ..... .. . Total Regulated Impervious Area Mitigation required if in excess of 2000sf 5. 6. Total Area Mitigated by Existing Stormwater Management System(s) Regulated Area Not Yet Mitigated 1 n 7. A ea Proposed to be Mitigated by Low Impact Development Techniques 8. Area Proposed to be Mitigated through Conventional SWM Techniques I (e.g. porous asphalt, porous concrete, paver blocks, concrete open celled paving grids, or plastic lattices filled with turf or stone) Revised on 310512012 E72-SWAf—Erosion—Control-03.05.12.doc Page 5 of 12 L) City of Edmonds Site Classification Worksheet Page 2 of 2 3) Determine the Total Area of Land Disturbing Activity sf Refer to Stormwater' Supplement Chapter 8 4) Determine the Quantity of Grading, Fill and/or Excavation --L13-cy 5) Will the project convert 3/4 Acre or More of Native Vegetation to Lawn or El Yes Landscaped Area? 6) Identify the Watershed the Existing Site Runoff Discharges to Refer to Stormwater Supplement Chapter 2.3 1 Based on Site Location and Watershed Map — Figure-C. Check all that apply. A.- R Direct Discharge B. R Creek or Lake Basin 11 Edmonds Way Basin • Puget Sound Basin • Puget Sound Piped Basin DETERMINE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION USING THE INFORMATION ABOVE AND THE PROJECT CLASSIFICATION CHART (Figure B, pg 4) El Small Site - Category I El Small Site - Category 2 D Minor Site Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement Stormwater Supplement Chapter 5 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Revised on 310512012 E72-SWM_Erosion—Control-03.05.12.doc Page 6 of 12 0 I AL K_ _4 I" ko flay- �0155 I(o o'c' od 5M (A-5 -,S10WQ 8 -S,11f, �VW) '�j IG 0 C 4 P A V-3 7 Y2_ o5TS W/ x �", 1'�' LLEAT,-- TO PM,. .4y, 6, �-Lllx I-0 A (0" 0.2�k. �A�' -7 e. wr ALL FRAMING PER UBC, 25 EDITION 4Z11RfFr.T Tn PHN (14PU CONDITIONAL KIMIT L w 0 �pm N C) Cc_uup CUT-V (23[ �11/1%�_ c,�L / /Lt CIL), ADDRESS-,20C? 1 -7 OWNER- __�P__PR6V-1_D DA"IE- G lie, /84 vu A FPP R 10 D I Fy BY BLf-jC-,. OFFIK""IAL KEEP THESE"7 STA.VkFED 106stlE FOR P L AN' "_ 3 0 iN I k I 1"'r-PECTIONS Ex I 1 sHEET ........... a:: ;i I 1 2- !� �7171 PERN'11T NO. Wall PECK- SECTIO�j LI-o 11 "TiLg�v* dx-k4 Ti�ltl cu C-C) 0 %-1 ocr_Q? I AtJ MAY 161984 1 occu PAW. /A 1_0