Loading...
213 ELM ST (2).pdft ;�Wn 611 CITY OF EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FILE #A-�I- ,DATE / 1) - FEE $25.00 REC'T # HEARING DATE:]/ - APPLICANT: N/M Clyde Dimick ADDRESS 213 Elm St., Edmonds, WA PHONE: 778-7672 Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Own Free and Clear OWNER: Sam ADDRESS: Same PHONE: same LOCATION OF PROPERTY (ADDRESS) 213 Elm Street, Edmonds, Va It LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: - Went 96 ft. of East 196 Ft. of Lot 10, Blk. 003 D-02 South Park Addition to Edmonds. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVED USE ZONE:. Rs 6000-L"' By Planning Department ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT: RS 6000 VARIANCE REQUESTED: To have corner of a double car garage to extend 9-1/2 ft. from present structure into setback from Ela Street, per plot plan attacked. STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA ATTACHED:- -we jjayL. -li_Ved in this home . f or 21 yqars . and at the time the house was buil the street and put in curbs and sidewalks a few years igo, it was a little used 12 ft. wide dirt road.- Builder did not sest the house back 25 ft. as'' (Cqi0,t).,- 10*er STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) Signature of Ap�plicant, Owner or Representative On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the tate f Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared,' ho, being duly sworn, on Ww/her oath deposes and says tha't (s)he has prepaeed an!- read the fo-re- going statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as 4&�her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Subscribed and sworn to before me this- day of 19=- residing atj� -Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. t-1 �7, ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT POINT 1. The following' are the special circumstances which apply to my property which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity under the identical zone classification. When our home was built 23 years ago, it waz not a part of tke city of Edmonds., and the -builder did not set tke house back 25 ft. as required by Edmonds Code. It was a narrow, little tr4valed dirt road put in by the builder. He also put ibn a small carport instead of a garage., which we would now like to build. POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel- fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in which my property is located because: We would have an arckitect or designer plan our'addition., Od we would like it designed at an angle from our home, as we feel it would be far more attractive that way, and increase the eatkatic value., and be in keeping witk the type of homes that will eventually be built across the street in Woodway Park. We also ovv tke separate lot to tke West of this site* POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because: We need enclosed storage., where'ay husband can Put his tools., nots (which now must be outaidet or in the carport getting deteriorated from sun and weatkor.) We also would like a place.to get one more of our cars off tke street plus a work area., where my husband can work on*kin nets even in bad weather. POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause in- consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which I am located. Since we are the Only kouse -facing Elm Street in this block and the two houses in the next blockAare closer to the street than Code, I do not feel any conditions need be imposed, since this addition should up rade the property. .9 M Re �1*Vnss of Fact by Board of A0jpatment cord of R The Board of Adjustment for the City of Edmonds finds in the case of kolz_ JL,,��L File No. V-6-7-77 request for variance at the following: I. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same are,in the file. -Twt been met. 2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/+ravu 3. In addition thereto, 4. Therefore, the *request for variance is Ze�/Granted, subject to the following special cond i t i 6iis : Section 12.16.110 ...... and if a building permit and/or occupancy �Trmit is not obtained for the subject property within one year from the date of the Board's decisions the con- ditional -use permit or variance shall be automatically null and void. ---II 6. Decision shall be effective on: (Date) DATED: Chainnan, Board of AdjusXment DATA Date of Application:- -;-6 - 77 Date of Hearing: Date of Publication:— Continuances:_ C(�P_k_,J Date of Posting: 11-11-77-7 Date of Appeal from Decision of the Board: ecretary,q)[Joard of-Adjus Mr, Hoiser B. S"ok*z Omm or in buying 11,A13 Second A"o Soo LincO3.* Mutwa Savings Bax4t Edmonds., WA. 34M 5tJ& Avesus seattus WA. Mr. and Mrs. L. C-Brixks 1141 — Second Avemus So., &jwortd&$, WA 98020 -t Went of tkis PrOPOrtYo uAK C.-Ilrds Dismick (km Vacant Lo 4 4 A 444u�y. c4rtAmo. j44op�j v U�)j�Z4 Got ..Opp PF WA L. p%t C� OU& 11V)C1JieMAr14iV /Voe to J44CA Ty 411ve /R AC,- &A. N,� Vv A Li� PAK P6Pr Fed P'rp"r y /0/8 0 po s e Z) f a /a MAI A IV C 46�0 WA '7eYefj3IF4 v 40 (01 wo. I I NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION FOR VARIANCE Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds V-67-77 FILE NO: 11-16-77. PUBLISH: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING­,.,.�... NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE AIY— .......................... 6, .......... AN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR ................................. .. .................................................. ............................ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS: ....... ................................. ................ ............................ . ... . .................................. .................................. ...................................... ZO N E CLASSIFICATION:. �74P .... . ��,,��JIME & DATE OF HEARING.Tw# J ...... 4/*70 DAY DATE TIME 'THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC, w!: CENTER, 5th AVENUE AND BELL STREET. ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN THIS OMMENTS PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT. C CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR AT THE MEETING, IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY­-BE___�_.�.._____._7 D NE 775-2525 EXT. 227). IN THE, AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (PHO OBTAINE EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME:.. ,.TIME AND PLACE. FILE NO...1//47-,?7 ...... PUBLISHED..// �7/(o. 7.7.7.... ......... . The removal, mutilation, destruction, or concealment of this notice prior to the date WARNING! of the hearing is a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. �'A ..... . ..... FILE 10. V-67-77 APPLI AiNT Dimmick. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER STATE OFMASHINGTON ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH �Iary Lou Block being -first dL ly -sworn on oath deposes and says: :r of That on the day 1911, the a att ched Notice of Public Hearing was posted as prescribed by'Ordi nance an in d any event, in the Post Office and Civic Center, and %, ihere, app.1 I c­� -able, on or near the subject prooerty S i 11 g A-C7 :Subscribed and sworn to before me th day' I is 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing atM"Iffd���__�____ NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the 21st day of December 19 77 9 has been set as the date for hearing petition filed by Clyde Dimmick for a variance - 3m&djxWmx&kxcMxpWxA:k of 113,,, from required 201 fro nt.,yard setback at 213 Elm Street said property being zoned RS-6 Said hearing will be at.7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Ci.vic Ce ' nter, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment and all interested person s are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds FILE NO: V-67-77 PUBLISH: 12-7-77 November 22, 1977 MEMO TO: Harry Whitcutt, Acting Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson, P.E. Director of Public Works RECEIVED NOV 2 3 1977 CITY OF EUMONDS aw SUBJECT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE NOVEMBER 30, 1977,.NEETING We have the following comments to make on the items on the subject agenda: V-51-77, ROBERT L. TRENT No comment. V-57-77, EDITH B.—COCKRUM At the subdivision hearing the Public Works Department indicated that theaccess to.the property was well below minimum standards. Based upon City Code, the Department recommended denial of the subdivision,as many of the requirements for serving the number of houses could not be met. Although, under the proposed plan submitted by the applicant, some limited access can be provided as well as various utilities. The burden of maintenance of the access, policing, and maintenance of utilities will be the responsibility of -the property owners. V-62-77, LARRY A. -BAILEY No comment. V-63-77, PAUL H. CARTMELL No comment. V-65-77,_JAMES BLAKLEY - The variance approval will not create a sight obstruction or safety problem. This Department recommends approval. V-66-77, JACK M. WILSON - No comment. V-67-77, CLYDE DIMMICK - The variance approval will not create __ a sight obstruction or safety problem. This DeDartment recommends approval. V-69-77, NELLIE GIBALSKI The proposed building addition will be utilizing the same setback as the existing structure and will not create a sight obstruction or safety problem. This Department recommends approval. RHA: lv STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Notice of Hearing Petition File NO. v-67-77 Rose Sellers . being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states: she That J= is the letral clerk of the Edmonds Tribune Review, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is -a legal newspaper of general circulation and it is now and has been for more than six (6.) months prior to the date of publication here- inafter referred to, printed in the English Language continuously as a weekly newspaper in Edmonds, Snohomish County, Washington, and it is now and during all of the said time was published in an office maintained at the afore- said place of publication of said newspaper. That the said Edmonds Tribune Review was approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of Snohomish County,- Washington. Court Order No. 38282. That the annex is a true copy of a legal, notice as it was published in a regular issue (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper once a week for a period of ],,consecutive weeks, commencing on the7th day of December and ending on the ay of d 19 both dates inclusive and that id newspaper was re sa gularly distributed to its subscribers during all of the aforesaid period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication in the sum of $ 2,-.56 has been paid in full, said charge being based on the rates allowed by statutes of the State of Washington. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this 7th day of December 1977 NO ,90 PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Lynnwood December 219 1977 MEMO TO: Harry Whitcutt, Acting Director Community Development Department FROM: Leif R. Larson Director of Public Works SUBJECT: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE DECEMBER 21, 1977, MEETING RECEIVED D rE c 2 i. 197 7 ? City of Edmonds CommunIty D80- D*"t, We have the following comments to make on the items on the subject agenda: V-57-77, EDITH COCKRUM - We recommend approval of the variance for the i-t—rip abutting the Enneking property subject to the following conditions: - Additional off-street parking will be provided on the new lots. -No parking will be permitted on the private road. - There will be no further subdivision of the property without expansion of the road width. - The pavement width will of course conform to the 18' minimum standard.. V-62-77, LARRY BAILEY No comment. V-67-77, CLYDE DIMMICK There is sufficient space on the property for construction of a garage within the setback areas. We would recommend that the garage be setback at least twenty -feet from the property line. CU-69-77, MICHAEL J'S STYLING SALON No comment. CU-64-77, ROBERT SUCHERT - If the applicant has valid reasons for delay of paving and landscaping the parking lot, we have no objections for the one-year period. Approval should only be granted subject to the gravel being retained in the parking lot and the street and sidewalks kept clear of any spi'll-over. V-68-77, KENNETH HOOD - No comment. V-70-77, STAN GWINN - Approval should only be granted sub - I ion that a complete grading plan be ject to the provis submitted showing the feasibility of a home construction on the lot containing the deep stream channel. RHA: lv *;icy SPUOWP3 6 1 OPP po—�V %%,VVWOjk.%$0700%0#A.00, Pp #-P20w#w n ew" 7"re") -Tp� ZI . ry I m `- EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT . December 28, 1$77 A special meeting of the Edmonds Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman Al Bailey at 7:35 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Edmonds Civic Center. PRESENT ABSENT Al Bailey Alice Stole Mary Lou Block, Associate Planner � Ken Hnxde Paul Roy Skip Simmons, Fire Inspector Harold Hatzenbuhler Ann Uer1eth Wayne Tanaka, City Attorney Ed Robinson Ana Marie Viplette, Recording � Gerrit Visser Secretary / Bill Lerams Chairman Bailey welcomed the audience and explained the functions of the Board, the procedure for handling of the hearings, and the method of appealing decisions of the Board. APPROVAL -OF_'IvV/rE� Minutes of the regular meeting of December 21, 1977, had not been distributed yet A MOTION WAS MAD[ BY MR. ROBINSON, SECONDED BY NR, HATZ[N8UHLER, THAT THE APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES BE POSTPONED UNTIL JANUARY 18, 1978. MOTION CARRIED. ' Before starting on the agenda, Mr. Robinson asked the Staff if it would be possi- ble to get an updated copy of the roster of Board of Adjustment members. Mary Lou Block replied that this would be sent to all members. | � AGENDA ' V47 A-47 - Variance of 111j' from required 20' front yard setback at `Elm Street', (RS-6) .A MOTION WAS MADE BY MR.RU8lNSON, SECONDED BY MR, LERAA5, THAT V-67-77 BE CONTINUED TO THE JANUARY 18, 1978 MEETING. MOTION . CARRIED. V~71~77 ALBERT GRONVOLD - Variance to allow 4-unit apartment building on access easement already serving more than three properties at } i approximately 8111 240th St, S.W. (RML) ! Mrs. Block said this application byAlbert and Finn Qronvold was | for a variance on property located north of 240th St' S.W., east ' of Highway 99 to allow additional property to access on a private easement already serving four properties. The Zoning Code re- quirement y a a private � t i that i ate easement be 20' access easement plus a 5^ utility easement' A vicinity map and slides depicted the area. The applicants divided the lots fronting 240th S.W. in 1963. They sold the St. Francis Motel property at an unspecified date' They sold two other lots immediately south of the subject property in 1966' In 1976 they joined together in a lot line | adjustment with Dun Finnegan and sold to Mr. Finnegan a 20' strip, | i thereby effectively eliminating their own potential access from � the east Mrs Block said this does not amount to a rezone. The ---- . i land in east. is not presently served by public streets and | \ strict enforcement of the Code would preclude the applicant from � � developing th�o�roperty unless alternate access could be found. � | " the property � There are difficulties in carrying out the provisions � re practical� ! of the Code now, but the applicant did have other recourses i ` before this time. The granting of u variance for this use would � ' allow approximately sixteen additional auto trips daily and . ' would be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of - ! adjacent properties. The rear portion of the easement is only � 15^ wide which is considered inadequate for fire protection. It ' would not be compatible with the requirements of the Zoning Code because of the applicants` creating this situation themselves and � � because private street standards dictate that the easement must ! be 20` in width with 18 paving. Based on these criteria, the � Staff recommended denial. Other departments recommending denial of this variance were Fire, Police and Engineering. The Fire ) ' ! . . | !' - ' | '~ � . .......... v BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING DECEMBER 28, 1977 CLYDE DIMMICK Has requested a continuance. V-67-77 77-, ---4qM"wO- r Januar7r 3-1 1978 Y B L-.-bf Adjustment oarc av of Editonde �Edmonds wA 98020 �4 Attention: Mary Block Dear W. Blocks Wtkrrefer6nee to our telepkone conversation, of tkis morning., we are kerewitk� reque sting, soutbauAne 6 of our-kearing on a T"iance for a double--4ar gara witk tke'Holidayst it kas been dif ficult to get togetlier witk U6 Ige people Wkom s and et measurements, etas We -need, f or assigtan*6%im de ign setbacksp i.e. corre LR order to give as suck -time aa possible,, we are. as I king f or a contimumew from.�' j 18tk to.Marok 15tk2 1978. "Uary you for your "sistance4l' Very truly yoursi t.F, QJ�Je 0. Dimick 4 RECEIVED JA M 1978 If City of Edmonds community DOWL DOOL CITY OF EDMONDS civic cr.NTER EDMONDS, WASwiNGTON 98020 e (206) 775-2525 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 14ARVE H. HARRISON ! 1* MAYOR PLANNING DIVISION, 'fj 11,­ Larry Bailey said that during the course of the design of the building they had thought they were meeting all setback requirements. Everything went smoothly and they applied for a building permit in June and when it was reviewed they discovered the 15' setback requirement which they had thought was lol. He said the structure to the immediate east had an improvement which had been built right up to the property line, so he felt a precedent had been set in the neighborhood which would support his application. He said the contractor was proceeding, based upon the outcome of this hearing. Vie added that to change the design now would entail cutting off the wing wall, and he felt it would be better for the the integrity of the design than to cut off the wing neighborhood to keep of the hearing wall to meet the setback requirement. The public portion was closed. knew Mr. Bailey by professional and civic reputation Mr. Robinson said he and he believed him when he stated this was a simple more than personally, - Bailey gives a lot of his time to help oversight . He noted that Mr s. MR. LERAAS FOUND THE APARTMENT HOUSE preserve the character of Edmond EQUESTED WOULD BE AN ATTRACTIVE BUILDING FOR THE AREA AND THAT THE VARIANCE R D HE FELT THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL WAS A MINIMUM VARIANCE, AN RALS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD 0 HE MOVED THAT TO THE HEALTH, WELFARE, AND MO AOSTION CARRIED. MRS. STOLE SECO14DED THE MOTION. V-62-77 BE APPROVED. V-67-77 CLYDE DIMMICK - Variance -of 11 . 3�ilffrom required-20' front yard,setback �t --2-13Elm St. (RS­�6) built 23 years ago and the present structure Mrs. Block said this house was not a rezone and'there were no is 171,,' from the property line. This was special conditions or circumstances not applicable to others in the area. She showed.slides of the property. Mrs. Block said it appeared the uild a carport without a variance. She applicant would have area to b ult of the appli- said the present location of the house is not the res Jid not propose to bring the carport cant's action and the applicant c a comparable out on the same line as the house. She said it appeared garage could be constructed meeting all setback requirements. She said it did not appear that it would be detrimental to other property owners, being the most affected, and that lot is the lot to the immediate west e built without a She said the garage could b owned by the applicant. inimum variance. As it did not appear that variance, so this was not a m he variance, it did not appear to be in there was justification for t Block recommended against approval. A harmony with the Code. Mrs. t ngineering Department reflected essen ially the same report from the E om the property and recommended the garage be set back at least 20' fr line. The public portion of the hearing was opened. The applicant said the street was put in by the State when the freeway The basic problem was how to get into the garage. was constructed. -off and would He said to move the garage back would place it an a drop 1, fill, etc. He said the garage would be 21' require considerable rocker� street is Woodway Park which is just develop - across the would from the curb,and garage at an angle to the house ing. He felt that to put the e of the give aesthetic value in addition to being more practical becaus drop-off. He said there is a very deep drop-off at the back and also the op rapidly. Mrs. Dimmick added that a breeze - lot to the west.begins to dr garage because there are windows way was necessary between the house and he house which would be lost if the garage were built there. on the side of t would leave the rockery the trees, and the Mr. Dimmick said this design concrete steps on the side of the house. He said th length of the garage would be 24', and the existing carport is 22'. He said he saw no way of because of the topDgraphy. Mr. Roy noted placing the garage elsewhere ire a smaller variance. that a 21' garage would be effective and would requ The public portion of the hearing was then closed. EDMONDS 10ARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 3 - December 21, 1977 Mr. Robinson noted that it was certainly good that the public hearings are held, as this matter demonstrated that the situation is not really known without the explanation revealed in the public hearing. He felt, however, that the applicant was reaching too far and that possibly a compromise could be reached. Mr. Roy felt the garage could be squared off but would not necessarily be the most attractive and it would be hard to back out of it. He said it wouldn't do anything for the street aesthetically. Mr. Bailey felt this was not a minimum variance and he thought there were alternatives. Mrs. Stole said it bothered her that the house was already in the setback and they wanted to go yet farther, although she understood the problem. Mrs. Block was asked whether she felt any differently about her recommendation since hearing the discussion. She said she was aware of the driveway situation and she thought it could be worked out by siting it back further, but it may entail a retaining wall She said she thought there were other alternatives. Mr. Roy said k Wa he still felt the setback asked was greater that it needeU LO C- proposed'a variance of 91-�' rather than the 11-12' requested. He felt a 22' garage was enough and that they owned the adjacent property so they could build a workshop or storage space. It was then determined that there were not sufficient and accurate enough drawings to make a determination as Mrs. Dimmick explained that she had not actually measured the dis- tances indicated. Wi�ROBINSON MOVED,,SECONDED�BY MR.::ROY, THAT V-67-77 BE CONTINUED�TO DECEMBER 23, 1977 IN ORDER TO OBTAIN MORE ACCURATE 1NFOR- ^"nred t-IATION. MOTIOWCARRIED. A short recess was an" CU-69-77 MICHAEL J'S STYLING SALON - Conditional Use Permit for Beaut : y . Salon,at _;_F� 7631 212t St. S.�W.RWIQ Mrs. Block indicated this establishment had been in existence for some time. It is a requirement that a beauty shop in an RM zone have a Conditional Use Permit in order to obtain a business license. The use had been existing and apparently had caused no problems, but there had been a change in ownership. The building was existing and parking was adequate. There had been no complaints from adjacent property owners. Mrs. Block indicated that the use appeared to be compatible and it met the criteria for beauty shops as a secondary use in an RML zone. She recommended approval and showed slides of the site. The public hearing was opened, no one wished to speak, and the public portion was closed. MRS. . DERLETH MOVED, SECONDED BY MRS. STOLE, TO APPROVE CU-69-77 BECAUSE IT HAD BEEN A BEAUTY SALON AND IT MET THE CRITERIA FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. MOTION CARRIED. BEG_ULARAGEIDA CU-64-77 ROBERT SUCHERT - Conditional Use Permit for temporary gravel rock surface parking lot at 8430 Main St. (RML) Mrs. Block read aloud the criteria for a Conditional Use Permit for a temporary parking lot. She showed slides of the existing parking lot. She said the reason the applicant wished to pursue a Conditional Use Permit for a temporary parking lot was because he intended in the near future to request a rezone for development ofa shopping mall. Mrs. Block said the problem with gravel parking lots is the disbursement of gravel material into the streets. The driveway in this case is paved so the Engineering Department did not object as long as provision is made to contain the gravel in the lot so it does not sPill over to the street. The amount of parking stall area was adequate. Mrs. Block said there had been no complaints from adjoining property owners and the parking lot had been in existence for some time. The applicant had been to the Amenities Design Board when he wanted to construct an addition to his structure, and the Amenities Design Board had approved the proposal with certain restructions. The public portion of the hearing was opened. EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Page 4 - December 21, 1977 E , HARVF- H. HARRISON MAYOR Cl-ry OF EOMONOS )775-2525 civic CENTER - EDMONDS. WASHINGTON 98020 0 (206 COMMUNITY Dr.VF-LOPMP-NT DGPARTMF-NT DATE: January 26� 1976 PLANNING DIVISION