21313 76TH AVE W.PDF111111 lill 11
6326
21313 76TH AVE W
7 c90
/K
CITY OF EDMONDS
J �&_w
8 9 0 - 19"
Address of Construction
01 13/3 - /!� __ /3-
Property Legal Description (include all easements):
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
PERMIT N? 8867
AA BALLINGER
LIFT STATION
RECKIVED
JUN 3 01997
UBLIG WORKS DEpl__.
Owner and/or C t t 1 V IV / f J / CA-,) k I I I I r (A-IL-4 V f
State License N', o5?
_;00 — Bu ng ermit No. V
C3 Si. gle Family 14asion into City Right -of -Way: El No A Yes
Multi -Family (No. of Units
RWC&nstruction Permit No.'
Commercial Cross other Privaite Property:k No El Yes
El Public Attach legal description and'copy of recorded easement
I,ee'rt)y t-hat I have read a
,p�ha comp y itv rel ments
iis-ip(dicated on the bacX'olt thetmit Card.
Date
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY tXCAVATION
OFFICE USE -ONLY
FOR INSPECTION CALL"M-4,M
.,,PUB,LI.0 WORKS DEPT.
60-00 7771,0,;��
Permit Fee: Issued By
TrunkCharge: 3GO-oo Date Issued:
Assessment Fe 92,Z-. Z-0 Receipt No.: 0
Lid No.:— P-4 6, M r-10 I w s P r o G rz #4 >_t
Partial Inspection: Ii"'i TAP 6/10/97 1 0 NN. "7J2A7 Date —Initial
Comments
Reason Rejected: Date —Initial —
Final Inspection Approved: Date I n itial ZIL
PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON.JOB SITE
White Copy: File Green Copy; inspector Buff Copy: Applicant Revised 3/90
H
The City of Edmonds
Side Sewer Drawing
EASEMENT NO . .................... .......................
NEW CONSTRUCTION E] REPAIRS F-1 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ...... Gq�4.A!0.�,f ..... CArst ........................ CONTRACTOR .................................................................................... PERMIT NO. .. 4.7.
JOB ADDRESS .... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ........................................ BLOCK NO . ....................................
.. ... . ... ... ... . .. .... .. ..... .. ..... .. ...
CID
r, 7�- - - - - ----
............................................................... ..................................... ----------------- -----------------------
NAME OF ADDITION .......................................................... j ....
--- --------
I cl 40
Lev tc/0) 6
D t, 19. 0 r-
j 3
Approved:
c /0 4--j to
SN
V,
0
t
On
stj 4=
(. PV c
t.'w a F
Cvrb4a
41-4 j te
PWW-0001-11/75(REV.11/78)
DATE At-1 ............. B y
40� -----------------------------
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an in dependent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS'Fl LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ........... ......................... CONTRACTOR ..... .... C,.oNsT... PERMIT NO. 7-3.4
c 01
3-7 3 4
3
JOB ADDRESS .................................... ... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTNO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . .............. 5.77-0. .4.1
................................................ : ..................................................................................................................
2.1-sv3-7(orK
97, 34(,
12:
a$
spuce
9-
i
A
WS
NAMEOF ADDITION ..: ...................................................................................................................
8.5,
1/2."C-OppeR
I
2"SUPERA-CM I.P.S.—PE.- IGO PS-1.
,,j/-r;tA,MeP_ wlaf-
%V3 17 7 (6 -r
2." P. S
2'.*F-
up.Aa5 f
COPMOZ I
3 1
r—1 . I
Approved: PASMAO-'s 9/12/P7
........... ... . .. ......
PWW-0,001-1 1175 (REV.1 1178) DATE Sx.r.-PT 15,A9.91. By MJL-10�/ ............
uj
:r
I-
11111111111111
15185
21313 76TH AVE W
�'77 :13
C. Isq'-1
City �f Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY'CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT Permit Number.
Lssue Date: 4 - 26-!2 >
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: - '2-4:?) 11 5"- -7 L tA h a L
B. Type o f Work (be specific): -_,� 7--7 uL),r it - 4n jl�--; 0 0 n Q &Q e-.& ij 0 A—)
C . Contractor: --2.^ *h AJ I C, < 01 I)f:, 7—Contact:
j p k (V 17_-A 0 r!) X A) I Cd'17T�
Mailing Address: P,() ]�QK 669 Irbi"40bghone: 4o e)') - 43o
State License #: 7's db Liability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. Commercial Subdivision E] City Project Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family Single Farmily Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete, Cut Yes E]No G. Size of Cut: x 10 H. Chargq�,$
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or description ivhatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not. limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS COMPLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO TfiEAPPLICANT
Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. Ir (ft W II I
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.
Work and material is to be inspected during,progress and at completion. JUN 2 7 1997
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. ENGINEERIN'-.-
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut trench -work shal I be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS. -
I have read the above statements an derstand the permit requirements and the pink copy of the permit will be
��un
available on site r ins ec 2)n purposes.
A;P'all timesfo
Signature: , _/�7, Date:
CA='77cr-c-ont actor or Ag_e_n77-""--_______
IAL-A-DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY FEE:
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER DAYS DISRUPTION FEE]FUND I 11:
RESTORATION FEE- -7
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
a K d W" 1.9 C, T OTAL FEE:
RECEIPT NO.:
ISSUED.BY_:
da I a
.3—V WV
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE Eng: Div 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 Route copy to Street Dept.)
Comments:
Diagram
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By:
FINAL APPROVAL BY:
El YES
Date:
Date:
El NO
r-'7 -?rW (1,CIZ
-- I'V ;��
3ev u 26
I O-P —t-w 0 d gy
V c
f
Qty�'.bf Edmonds
-RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT
Permit Number. 9-Y
Wue Date: 7
A. 'Address or Vicinity of Construction: 943/1 I&A A&E U/
B. Type of Work' (be specific): A16
112 C. Isoci or— PVC-- I M
IZW NEW ARAMMEAIr (302"
C. Contractor: Contact
Mailing Address: _4M YAqw —.crj Phone:
State License #: jelaA Liability Insurance: Bond: $
. D. Building Permit #(if applicable):
S ide Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. F-1 Commercial E] Subdivisi6n E] City Project E] Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG(,CA13LV WATER)
F1 Multi -Family El Single Family Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: E]Yes �_No G. SizeofCut: _41' x Hi, Charge.
T.1
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or 'description whatsoever, foreseen'or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason of granting thispermit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS C011PLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BEPROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT
Two sets of construction,drawings of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineerini Division, 771-0220.
Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Publi'd,,Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut trench work sh�all be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior tothe end of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy. of the permit will be,,
available on site..al all timesfior, * spection purposes.
Signature., Date:
_1_(C!61�6n1"tr`actor or Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK'
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY: RIGHT OF WAY FEE: -,212,
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER I Lo DAYS DISRUPTION FEEIFUND I H:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE:
T OTALFEE:
RECEIPT NO.:
ISSUED BY -
NO WORK SHALL. BEGIN PRIOR T&T1fRN'IIT ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 11.1 Route copy to Street Dept.)
Comments:
"Diagram
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
13) 7 -7/c4k AY \/V
'�-b - q -7
AIEW 1419�1- --�fA6nL I I
PVL,-
1) )'31 r7
(NE—W cous-�,
CitEdmon&
f
RIGHT-OF-WAY�;CONST]ItUCTION
PERMIT 6717- C4
Pennit Number.
UsueDate:
A. Address or Vicinity of Consiru6tion: 21,317 76 AV W (9716315)
9 C� B. Type of Work (be specific): Install 55' of 1-1/4" MPE IP on 76 Av W
from 25' W to East edge of ROW @ 3101 + — N C/L 214 St SW
C. Contractor: Puget Sound Energy Contact: Mastmne Kingsbury
Mailing Address:' 1122 75 St SW Everett Phone: 356-7500 X7596
State License #: 98203 Liability Insurance: Bond:$
D. Building Permit # (if applicable): Side Sewer Permit. # (if applicable):
E. Commercial Subdivision El City Project [Z) Utility (PUD, tTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family Single Family EJ Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: wk4cotJ
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: Yes []No 3 G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge - $
ffA
APPLICANT TO READ Ai4D SIGN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City ofEdmonds harmless from injuries, damages, or
claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may he made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not . limited to the defense ofany legalproceedings including defense Costs, and attorney fees by reason c;fgranting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH
IS COMPLETEO BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO Eyf�viilvkr�
Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is requi . red for inspection; Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220. J U N 3 0 1997
Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at completion. ENGINEERING
Restoration is * to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end.of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
Ihave read the above statements and understand thepermitrequiremehts and thepink copy of thepermit will be
available on site at all times for inspection purposes.
97 Signature: e:
ohtractgf(j Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY: &6J- RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER A%A) DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND III:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:.
-7, 761E,
4_-
COMMENTS:
RESTORATION FEE:
PERMIT FEE:
TOTAL FEE:
RECEIPT FEE:,
DATE:- ISSUED BY:,
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng. Div. 1994
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES
Comments:
Diagram
(Fund -111 - Route copy to Street Dept.)
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES E] NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
. . . . . .....
MAYOR
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 (206) 771-0220 FAX (206) 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
� CITY OF EDMONDS
APPLICANT: Bruce Goodnight
CASE NO.: V 97-40
LOCATION: 21317 76th Avenue West (see Exhibit A, Attachments 1, 2 and 4).
APPLICATION: A variance for an 8-foot fence on top of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining
wall where the maximum permitted combined fence and retaining
wall height of 6 feet is allowed. The requested variance has been
proposed to'mitigate potential impacts to the exist) condominium
to the south of the proposed development (see Exhibit. A,
Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6).
REVIEW PROCESS,: Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
MAJOR ISSUES:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17 (FENCE
HEIGHT).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20
(VARIANCES).
Description of Proposal
Application by Bruce Goodnight to install an eight toot high fence along the south property top
of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining wall. The proposed fence is intended to mitigate impacts to the
existing condominium to the south of the proposed development. The F fence is a requirements
placed on the subject property by the ADB as part of its approve D 12 unit multiple family
complex (File No. ADB-97-12 1) (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation:
Hearing Examiner Decision:
Approve with conditions
Approve with conditions
* Incorporated August 11, 1890 e
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The
hearing on the application was opened at 9:05 a.m., May 1, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds
Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:08 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and
the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the -hearing is
available in the Planning Division.
HEARING COMMENTS:
The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor, entered the staff report into the record and
recommended approval of the request with conditions.
From the Applicant:
Bruce Goodnight, applicant, said he concurred with the conditions and said that the
proposed retaining wall and fence will provide privacy for the adjacent neighbors.
From the Community:
No one from the general public spoke at the hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Site Description
I
1. Site Development And Zoning:.
a) Facts :
(1) Size: The subject property is 32,228 square feet in area. The proposed fence
would be located along the south property line (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
(2) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Residential, multiple family, 2.400
square feet of lot area required p er dwelling unit (RM 2.4).
(3) Existing and Proposed Development: * The site is currently vacant. A single family
building was recently moved off the site to allow the construction of a new 12
unit multiple family development. The ADB has granted approval of the design of
the new building, and the applicant has applied for building permits.
(4) Terrain'and Vegetation: The subject property slopes gently down to the east away
from 76th Avenue West, and then slopes down steeply at the eastern end of the
property to the adjacent developments. All vegetation has been removed from the
site in preparation for construction. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the
site with ornamental landscaping around the perimeter of the site (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4).
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 3
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a) Facts:
(1) North: Developed with a 12 unit multiple (family dwelling complex. and
zoned RM 2.4.
(2) South Developed with a 12 unit multiple family dwelling complex. and zoned
RM 2.4.
(3) East: Developed with a large multiple family dwelling complex and zoned CG
under a contract rezone.
(4) West: Currently under constructiol I with a new high school. and zoned Public
Use (P).
b) Conclusion: The proposed development would be consistent with the surrounding
zoning and development.
B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance
1. Compliance with RM 2.4
2. Zoning Standards
a) Facts:
(1) The fundamental site development standards in a RM 2.4 zone are set forth in
Chapter 16.30.
(2) The proposed building and site development conforms to all RM 2.4
requirements.
(3) ECDC Chapter 17.30 states the standards by which fences may be developed,
including height. The standards from which the applicant is requesting relief are:
"Unless a variance isfirst obtained nofence or hedge shall be more than 6jeet in
height as measuredfrom the top of thefence to the lowest original grade "(ECDC
IZ30.000(Q). and
"When a retaining wall tree feet or greater -is contiguous to andbelow aproposed
fence, the proposedjence may be constructedfor the purposes of safety not greater
thanfourfeet above the top of the retaining wall or thefinisihed grade, whichever is
less. " (ECDC 17.30. OOO(D)).
b) Conclusion: As conditioned the proposal complies with the development standards
for RM 2.4 zones as set forth in Chapter 16.30 and 17.30 except the standard for
which the applicant is seeking a variance.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 4
3. Compliance with requirement for a Variance
ECDC Chapter 20.85 (Variances) states an applicant may request a variance from the
standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85.
Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC also sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of' the
Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the provision would
result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
a) Facts:
(1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a variance
request must comply in order to he granted by the Hearing Examiner. These
criteria include: a special circumstance must exist; no special privilege is granted.
the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code; the
proposal will not be detrimental and is the minimum necessary.
(2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to,
modify use or procedural requirements.
(3) The applicant states that special circumstances exist due to the adjacent
development. "The proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums are situated between two
existing condominium projects. The adjacent Rose Pointe Condominiums are to
the north with the rear yards facing the site. The adjacent Stratford Square
Condominiums are to the south with their rear yardsfacing the proposed project.
The proposedJence is to buffer the impact of the two adjacent rear yards. that of
the proposed Rose Ridge, and the adjacent Stratford Square Condominiums. as
required I—v the ADB.
(4) The applicant states that the proposal would not he a grant of special privilege as
other fence height variances have been- granted by the City of Edmonds, for
buffering adjacent properties. Many of the other sites which used taller fences to
buffer impacts are buffering commercial impacts from existing multiple family
developments. These sites include the Top Foods site and the Funtasia site. One
case where an impact from a new Multiple Family project was buffeted from an
existing Multiple Family site was at the Cottage Crest Condominiums on 196th
Street Southwest.
(5) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
.and by developing multiple family while protecting privacy.
(6) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance as
the applicant is developing twelve units where the zoning allows twelve units.
(7) The applicant states that the proposal will not be detrimental as the fence was
required by the ADB to mitigate privacy reduction impact.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40-
Page 5
(8) The applicant states that this is the minimum variance because, based on
testimony by adjacent property owners., the ADB recommended that the height of
the fence be allowed to be eight feet along the southern property line.
(9) The proposed design has been approved by the ADB with the condition that the
applicant obtain a variance to allow the proposed fence height (file No.
ADB-96121 ) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 6).
b) Conclusions:
(1) Special Circumstances
Special circumstances include the size. shape, topography, location or
surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures.
Special circumstances exist for this proposal due to the location or surrounding..
of the property. Specifically. the condominium project to the' north is oriented.
with the drive aisle on the north side and the backyards on the south side, while
the condominium project on the south is oriented with the drive aisle on the south
side and the backyards on the north side. This requires the backyards of the
proposed project to face the backyards of an existing project.
(2) Special Privilege
It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting'this
variance as other fence height variances have been granted by the City 'of
Edmonds for buffering adjacent properties.
(3) Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan
Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the development of the site in
a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive
Plan designation of the site while preserving privacy of adjacent properties. -
(4) Not Detrimental
Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health. safety or
welfare because the proposal is intended to reduce detrimental impacts. .
(5) Minimum Required
The request is the minimum necessary to reduce the possible impacts of tile
proposal on adjacent properties.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 6
C. Technical Committee
1. Engineering Division Comments
a) Fact: The Engineering Division has commented that the height of the fence. adjacent
to 76th Avenue West must not he allowed at a height which would create a vehicle
sight obstruction for vehicles entering and exiting 76th Avenue West.
b) Conclusion: A condition should be incorporated into the decision stating that the
applicant must obtain a building permit for the proposed fence, and that the fence
must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division with
respect to vehicle sight distance.
2. Other Comments
a) Fact: No other City Divisions or Departments submitted comments.
D. Critical Areas Ordinance
1. Facts:
a) The subject proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.1 SB (Critical
Areas Ordinance).
b) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist, and the City has issued a
Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Critical Areas Study (File No CA-96-21 1)
2. Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of the ECDC Chapter
20.15B.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance is approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. This variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan
(see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Any other structures, additions or remodels would have to
conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or the
applicant/property owner would be required to obtain an additional -variance.
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility. of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The applicant must obtaining a building permit for the proposed fence.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 7
4. The fence must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division
pertaining to vehicle site distance obstruction.
5. The permit is transferable.
Entered this 9th day of May, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
�on McConn—ell
Hearing Examiner
RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Section 20.100.010.G allows for' the Hearing, Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the- subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must
cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
APPEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
the conditional use permit shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 8
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change inthe valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIBIT:
The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
PARTIES OF RECORD:
Bruce Goodnight
Goodnight Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 669
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds Planning Division
Edmonds Public Works Division
Edmonds Engineering Division
Edmonds Parks & Recreation Division
Edmonds Fire Department
PROJECT -REVIEW CHECKLIST-"
PROJECT NAME'.`.,,�
4
LAN 61.
PROJECT ADD tSS. ;
RECEIPT DATE
... .....
0. BY:
nif
1. PLAN.,
WATER.:
MINI Im.-
0 E .........
FIRE:'
SEWER'
. :!�'i*' om
M- o- M.W.LTs rrM MUM we
Conditional Use --Permit
ADS Requirements 4
Cther Zoning Requirements
I _7111 WIMEMM 07201, MWER ME, 10.
M-fr-rq7*7r-=1 MWOMIZE-12 �MIMIMMZM'11� MMM
I IrOM-i Ina ��Mfm
&*4:Tj4-trV7*TtT5T-MM.
0 11,111
EM11:1111:41-u-9mv
,A .1
"� ,
IM a,
op %4,!
1W7*-M11r-_TT9N7#TroTo1LTr_Mo
Mjff=,��
MEMMMEM
1#Trf rX93 FM 711MMM-To
EM1111 rlql-.�Mgmm
MMMI MMKM
����Mmmwm
M10 _.�Mm
�11 brFM
MV
MIX -10KN
MINE m MM���
M. �=m
Setback - Storm Drain UnW./
�open Ditch __ Existing
M_41�77(/m ml�Mm
'Culvert Required
M spam.�MIMMEM
Culven Size
11MR-1 MINE, miwl.m��Em
M, MMM:Tmq��-
'Catch Basin Required
�10`61
'Driveway Slope & Vehicle Access
iSidewalk Required
�Curb & Gutter Required
M&MOME MMMM��MM
Street Paving Required
I In "I gm T"no
Street Name Sign Required
Other Signing Required
'FEMA Map Check/Water Table
iSide Sewer Availability
:1/-�
,:Create Street File
mum?"M MMEM
Water Meter Size
M91712-200
ME, NWIMMI,
'Mr
Service Line Size
I M.
W, 010, M MINIMUM,=
EM
E�=! �1- m-_ _._ "M
'11
wa
�Hydrant Required
Hydrant Size ExMng
MIN
I ROME"." � 0.15R ��
MR
MMMII�
ME MAAMJMAWM��MN
Reviewed By:
FIRE
I
PLANNING
ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS
1,J/
0UBLIG-WORKS DEpj
PERMIT APPLICATION. REQUIREMENTS
o: Applicant
rom: Jamal Mahmoud, Engineering bLVector
"ne,
rc, PlanChe&No: 9?-gv
fter review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met:
Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 AbL-10:00 PJVL;WEEKENDSIHOLIDAYS — 10:00 A.IVL-6:00 P.M.
A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCMON PERMIT is required for all work on public property. (ECDC 1&60)
Truck haul route plan must be submitted and approved prior to. permit issuance.
Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 18.30-030d).
NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAM OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED DRAINAGE
FACILITY. BUILDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAVVi&G.
(ECDC 1&30.50G)
FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION.
(ECDC 1&30)
INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN
INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BACKFILIANG. (ECDC 1&30)
Repair or replace all defective existing curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp
may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit
(ECDC 1&90)
Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to
2-0 - %. (ECDC 18.80.060D)
Driveways must be paved from' property line to City RIGHT-OF-WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C)
INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18.30)
No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department
Connection to City water sye-em is required. There is a sepatate charge -for the water mew (ECD.0 7.20)..
A back water valve is required if downstaiis plumbing is below the elcva*tion of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20)
Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10)
Connection th City sanitary system is required. A separate permit is required.
LID# Fees paid: Yes No Charge- (ECDC 18.10)
Underground wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 500/o of the total assessed
value of the structure. (ECDC 1&90)
A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPEiCnON IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC IMO)
1 aAMIM
k
S3 STREFT FILE
MAR 17
PERMITCOUVr
Vto T- L* 4o
I AZD + 411, + 414. 4kT AuiE LmE
41LI + ZC'A 4A. & 5** e-.Oc 8 MAA Z14E
Pexl.)AL.
7
bukil oz
ik2� 415.zr-+ 445-1- 4o,z:s-+4kj.
4%Z.. 9 75'+ Z5* 4-57.8 7-�r+ -Ir apoC 44ZB7!r re)f+,x 2)y
Ptrm- Pi.& A63-76' Arb4r- 44.7C etvuAL.
43 4ox!r-t 411, 75,+ 4o'6.79 -t 4o+
44,76+ Z-5"- 431.76. .43L. 6 m" ajbc4i
X
Pd-Al> PL kLL� RQ if— Aczo ftL-
*3
-but LAOILWI
09�O ?
-t-0 C. 18 C) 13
C-)
CITY OF EDMONDS
0
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 '- (206) 771-0220 - FAX J206) 771-0221 -
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -
Public Works a Planning * Parks and Recreation * Engineering
March 31, 1997
STREET FILE '5 12-
Del Erickson, P.E.
15020 S.E. 46th St.
Bellevue, WA 98006
Subject: - Proposed 12 Unit Development 21217 - 76th Ave. W. (ADB-96-1 Z11
Dear Mr. Erickson,
The Engineering Division is not able to adequately review the submitted plans
because the storm calculations do not conform to SCS methodology as required
in the attached Ordinance No. 3013. Please revise the calculations and the
plans accordingly so that review of the project can take place. The Engineering
Division is withholding comments on any other issues until the revisions are
received. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans,
along with a set of the revised calculations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact Don Fiene at 771-0220,
extension 323.
Sincerely,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW1sf
Enclosures
cc: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator
A96121.DOC
e Incorporated August 11, 1890 *
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
u.
. . . . . . . . . .........
01;
.9. 9
4,
A),
city,
EuMbU I ah �S_
* 4s) %.V, z b-
r. ic
rea
h KI
'ne Critical Areas Che&lisi-
on k6�='it it to the at
Wiff
W) 77W oy. ne city
d& f0m is to-'.bc filled out by my Pawn." t�� die site
makea MC
VISIt" tfid nati P_ ursory `
Prqp;anng,aP,,qy lop .nl . R
.,,p, . �- - _'� .. i: iia" jet"i on of th& S
Application, Bor the City of EdniWds-p n-'o-r,,) _awyov� `,�j
necesSarY to complete a
to his/h
er submittal of -a develOPMenti' '--deve1Dpftwperjnit plicati;'<'1'
ap on.
permit. to the City.
With a signed c orm,,the
Vy of this f
ne Purpose of -the -Checklist -is- to -enable aPPXM Should also submi . t a vicinity map -
City Staff to determule-whether-2ny— or plot plan for individual lotsof the-p—arcel
.potent.WCriticalL,�imai�.6i'�hiiybe.'..;�.-,---.-�- vdth 666g-b
City staff can find
present on 16�*�W�ject pro rt .6- !:iidenfif
pe- Tbe.,1,
2mi. ydi;ESWjeCt
77
infonnatio-it neddM 1D complete the all ons shall indU&
Checklist should, cuily, availaW ftidi 7
atlier p
ns
dbsw,�alio i of the site or dtj'ii�ii
raphy map, -etc.) or studies.in
City Hall (Crx ml-Areas inventories, C60jubtfiodw MOMeWj�t--
IT12pd 1*2 ?
or
Sod
St:2k_ Jed
AWCOMP ng their prelitnina
ry,
volt-Assessmentof the
6
Anapplicanti-or" �reprd�Mtative,
must fill out the checjdist� sign and date i
I havicompleted- the attachM"Ciiii 69-Aiji j- 1 7
Checklist and attest that the answers provided are
fiactual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the
apPropfiate column below)
Owner I Applicant: -
R�present:ative:
A t
A
Name ka. k -
.0, PON
Street Address
Strtet Addr=
;0'4;
0-
City, State, ZIP P
hone
, -3. �y, State, Phone
7.7�'
Signature
ii6i
a e,,,,,' s,
D t
Ignature Datel;sx
44,
re st 9,�
`.Crifical',"A' as�Chd&fii
C
Y7
Site infe.'rmation'.-(so,iL�lwp,6graphy/hyd I
M4:
Ito
umf
WE
Property Tax
2
Account Number
Ifs,
App
rOximate Site Size (acres or square feet):
.,
4. Is this site currently developpd? no.
---&-yes;
If yes; how is site developed?
topography. Check all that ��-,JP
5. Describe the general site
V - ih P
p
Flat: less than 5-feeeli%iiii6n cbange over 'entire site.
Rolling: slopes on site g�q�.Iess than 15%
P vertical. Kise4of -10466t
orEw
hi n6lldis�n 'Of isr;k).
IG iJi.,t LnA�4;
"T,
SlOpespresent on site of more than 15% and less-iMn,16%,('iv��"�'
,of 164eet 0 v�*eir a horiz;6ntal distance of 33 to 66-feet)-31
-StecP: .9rades of greater than30% present on site (a,�e&tc�:�rise Of loifi.ek,.,O�
Wizontal distance of less 9m 33-feet).
(please describe):
6.- Site containsareas of year-round stafidip'g w'aiter
A
..pprq�. Depth:
7. Site cb�jjins areas of S��n .stah&t vrAw.:�
;al ng Approx2 Depth�'
What season(s) of the yearT
8. Site is,M-- the fioodi�iy flood I
p am of a water course.
9. Site'Contaig'a creek oran area wh 0,ws
ere ' waW.flows across the grounds surfaceT F1 are-year-�
rou�d? �_'Flowis* a*re seasonal? (What time of year?
10. Site is primarily: forested ;-meadow shrubs t11c_Z ;.Mixed
urban landscaped (la
wn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
for City Staff Use Only
1. SiteiiZOMV
2. kS triapped soil type(s)? ,h5�
3. Wedand inventory or C.A_ rnap indicates wetla�d p*resent on site? Al-0
---,Cr , itical Areas inventory or C.A. xnap indicates Critical Area on site? ; -A�_)
te W4
5.. "Si t�,'ri designated earth subsidence landslide hizud area?
6. jes';tgnated on the Enviroarnentally,SensitiveAreas MaIP
J
-D RN
ETE —MATION
P, C
"-YMDY
R-13,01UMED CONDMONAL WAjV*EX1.
IYER
RevieWed by,.
.�lan er I Date
CETV
RCWQlffl4tV4
AR.1 31597
EmnOUNTER
I
RECORDED
RNfADD
.20
i of, iii6nd's''Biuildin' Division 97 HAR:1 3 PH;2
9 -7 "t
VV.250'5th`Avenue North
AUDITOR
Edmonds;'WA 98020 SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASH.-
DEPUTY---
BUILDINo
MAR 2 8 1997
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MULTI-FAMMY RESMENTLAL
Reference N:
Grantor(s): (1) 7101:01,ndMll-g- I Additional on pg.
Grantee(s):- City of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec e,2-7 Twn; ,-,Pz Al Rng o 51.6 tr
OR Lot — Block�?�P-z�,oPlate!S�Z�-Y - 64a."v.4 7A4
Assessor's Tax Parcel IDN(s): (1) 4<6 j1- e0o - 00 > --a*)— 06
Assessor's Tax Parcel IDN not yet assigned
WHEREAS, / wm
3.e 0-7 x ( -
are the owners of the f'oflowing described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Address:
Legal Description: /2/1/2A�j
/0- el 0
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # 54 "0 0 0 oo;> — 00 0
WHEREASO the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon
said premises in co mpliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
VOL 32.80PABE0626
Mk W
7"It
1.
RETURNADDRESS:
City of Edmonds, Building Division
-'250 5th Avenue North
Edmonds. WA 98020
WITNESSEII�, that for and in consideration of the premises, the above named. -owners do
hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -
wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance
of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on
subject property containing more than units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs,
successors and assigns.
DATED this day of '19
GRANTOR
State of Washington
)ss
County of SnOhOmish I
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brim K Goodn:Lght _ signed
this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and
acimowledged it as the grantor — (title) of =DNI[CM MW COMT (name of party
on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the
uses and purposes mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th
day of iss" 19 97
0,
NOTARY 'V- ( I--- -
No
Wasl�iiigton.
PUOUC
�P Al commission expires Ju]Ly 31, 1999
Y
X
va. 3280PA6EO627
97031302.8 5
PLANNING DATA
SITE ADDRESS:-21313,15,17 76th Avwe W DATE: 3/27/97
ZONING: RM 2.4 PLAN CHK#: 97-80 ADB # 96-121
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 12 unit Multiple Family Building
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 15 Left Side: 10 Right Side: 10 Rear: 15
Actual Setbacks:
Front: I--/ Left Side: Right Side: Rear:
CORNER LOT no (Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED NO (Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE:
Maximum Allowed: 45% Actual:
BUILDING HEIGHT: ?/-A
Maximum Allowed: 25 + 5'for a 4:12 roof Actual Height: 7�-
Datum Point: P. 4:'eae4-A,,� Datum Elevation:
SUBDIVISION / LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: No
CRITICAL AREAS #: (VA!:r&
SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS w/ADB, appeal exp 12/10/96
LOTAREA:
DENSITY ALLOWED 1 per 2,400 s.f. UNITS ALLOWED 13 PROPOSED-1 2
BONDING REQUIRED (ys/no) yes .(for what?) Landscaping $ ' &00
OTHER: Al-1110 li-ef5e-E-D Fe,-7t- r!!� Z"V5CtVg- Azz
Plan Review By:
�7, 71-
OEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way), Suite 16
Bellevue, WA 98005
(206) 747-5618
FAX 747-8561
Goodnight Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 669
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Attention: Brian Goodnight
Ic I
APR 0 1 1997
PERMIT COUNTER
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations
Proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums
21317 - 76th Avenue West
Edmond, Washington
Dear Mr. Goodnight:
March 31, 1997
JN 97115
On March 28, 1997, a geotechnical engineer from our office visited the site of the proposed Rose
Ridge Condominiums at 21317 - 76th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of
this visit was to explore site subsurface conditions and to provide recommendations for foundation
design. The recommendations and conclusion presented in this report are professional opinions
based on the visual observations made during our site visit and on previous experience with other
projects in the vicinity.
We understand that you propose to construct three multi -unit buildings, totaling 12 units, on the
project site. The two westemmost building will have wood framed floors constructed over a crawl
space. The easternmost structure will have a daylight basement.
The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits in or near the proposed
building footprints. The test pits were excavated on March 28, 1997, with a trackhoe provided by
the client. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process and logged
the test pits. The test pit logs are maintained in our files and are available upon request.
The site has been cleared and most of the topsoil removed! The soils at the test pit locations
generally consist of one to three feet of loose to medium -dense reddish -brown silty sand with
some gravel and roots, overlying several feet of medium -dense to dense gravelly sand. The
gravelly sand is underlain by dense to very dense glacial till soils consisting of gray silty sand with
gravel to a maximum explored depth of eight feet. No groundwater seepage was observed in the
test pits. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors.
It is possible that perched groundwater could be found between the near -surface weathered soil
and the underlying dense glacial till.
A
Goodnight Brothers Construction JN 97115
March 31, 1997 Page 2
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the observations made during our site visit, it appears that construction of the three
condominium buildings is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The structures can
be supported on conventional foundations that bear on competent native soils underlying the site.
The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional footings bearing directly on medium -
dense to dense native gravelly sand or the dense to very dense glacial till soils. These soils were
encountered at about 1 to 3 feet in the test pits. Continuous and isolated footings should have
minimum widths of 12 inches and 16 inches, respectively. The footing subgrades must be cleaned
of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable
soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). A one-third increase in this design
bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above
design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post -construction settlement of footings founded on
competent, native soils will be about one-half inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and
the bearing soil. We recommend using an allowable coefficient of friction equal to 0.40 for the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
LIMITATIONS
The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site
conditions as they existed at the time of our site visit. If the subsurface conditions encountered
during construction are significantly different from those anticipated, we should be advised at once
so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary.
Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites. Such unexpected
conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a propedy constructed
project.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Goodnight Brothers Construction and its
representatives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and
conclusions are based on the site materials observed and on previous experience with sites that
have similar observed conditions. The conclusions and recommendations are professional
opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the limited scope of our
services. No warranty is expressed or implied.
We trust that this report meets. your immediate needs for the proposed development. Please
contact us, if we can be of further service.
Goodnight Brothers Construction
March 31, 1997
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
F, R T
4)*
29740
IST
'j"01VA1, S
1EXPIRES to-2,1,-1-7 I
D. Robert Ward, P.E.
Associate
DRW:mmm
JN 97115
Page 3
.,Z
C.
City of Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT Per I mit Number:
Issue Date: /0 - 070
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: -Ap-PA NOE.) CAJ
B. Tvne of Work (be snecific).*N RCQ�'Vk k �1� I A K\4
&90.199-
. Co
Contractor: (C"W� RQVI Intact: L�\C'V�
Mailing Address: AI�Ab VkQ,-( 9 � Phone: 6-7 0 — Z-'c),O C�l
State License #: 00"WOS uA 9V),�Oo Liability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
0.
E. F� Commercial EJ Subdivision El City Project D( Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family E] Single Family r-1 Other
X $
INSPECTOR: 6#1494444A INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut : 4;kyes 0No G. Size of Cut- x H. Charge$
APPLICANT TO READ AN GN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to . f1de City of Edmonds harmleslP ..... (jJ1e;-,Z ages, or
claims of any jUnd or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made against,the City of Edmonds, or atiy of Us departments or: employ-
ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense cdiiR�,�n�,abdrney fees by reason of dr4ntini'this pe"r7?dt.*-?
p �
THE CONTRA CTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MA TERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWNG THE FINAL INSPEC77ON
AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ES77MA TED RESTORA77ON FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL S7REET PATCH IS COMPLE7ED BY
CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FAR)ibsqANcE To THEAPPLICANT,', , > -
Construction drawing of proposed work keqt�ired wito. permit application.
EA6fieerin Departm
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call th 9 eJ=
Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration is to be i n accordance with City Codes. 771-0220
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City En&iter,
e
All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved matf Ab
to the end otA,6"� "IfyiijkRlay;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy,of the permit will be available
11 fi
on site at a tjjkne n
I
Signature:o�= M:L Date:
(Contractor or Ag 10
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
ANCE
Engrg. Div. 1991
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund I I I Route copy to Street Oept.)
Comments:
Diagram:
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO
Partial Work Inspection by P. W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
Eng. Div. Jul:
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewerstubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
CIVIC * CITY OF EDMONDS
CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT Call PROsPect 6-1107 when work
Is ready for inspection. (No ins
UORS Saturday, Sunday or holl Per'
SIDE SEWER PERMIT "".) N2
1091
ADDRESS .............
OWNER ........ Mickey --- 119smon .................... .............................. CONTRACTOR .... W.1-11.&f ;L0
T) .............
Permission is granted ----------- Juna,.2k ............... 1 19.16A., for
With CRY Sewers in ac'cordance with application on file and governing 0 "YS, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
rdinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. 1—The owners of the property may obtain a Permit to construct sewer inside property line. A licensed Side Sewer Cont�actor must'
be emPloyed to construct side sewer in street area. Do not cover any Portion of sewer before it has been Inspected.
7 No. 2--Obtain full Information regarding Ordinance 11.16.DW and Regulations governing side sewers when you get permit.
E No. 3--Top of side sewer must have at least 30 Inches coverage at property line and 12 inches inside property line;
No bends in grade sharper than % will be Permitted. minimum grade of 2%.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street restored to original condition. Contractor be res Ible for
failure due to improper work Which May develop within one Year of completion.
NOTE No. 5--It Is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is Provided for in the permit, or to do any work on t: shall
purten&nces except to insert the pipe Into the wye. e main sewer- or its ap-
"TREET Fl
f Edmordt
LE jATIOR
A
I E R - P E R m r r
OUTSIDE Ik ��IDE .0
..REPAIRS 0
. I *,-�j —u / /, 4.) f_j
WNEW..
0 .... . .... .... ..
fy .......... 0., 5. W.-A 9.
H 0 U S E N ........
. ................... ................................................... . ...........................
7
'CARD No.
EASEMENT No . .... .....
R. ... ...
'0 . .. .... c/ ..............................
CONTRACTO ................. ..... -.,,PERMIT
STREET
7
AVENUELOT No . ...... / ....................................................................... BLOCK No`� ..............
NAME ADD ....
J
A P P 0
Jl
2,6-.�j a"Va �;O,
Date Approved:
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED ................ ................... ....... DEPOSIT, ......................................................
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ........................................ .......
BY..
DATE
REVISION No. 2
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
FOR
2131-3-17 7-6-LI-i Jzk.Nrcarixaca Wqs�r�-�t
jXPfRES %%-It -I
April. 1997
Applicant:
Goodnight Brothers ConsC.
P.O. Box 669-
Edmonds, WA. 98020
Tel: 517-4961
Engineer:
Del Erickson, P.E.
15020 S.E. 46tb St.
Bellevue, Wa. 98006
Tel: 747-5825
WALnnplLa! T N7 IE
0
DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS:
Attached hereto is a copy of the Off -Site Analysis
prepared in December of 1995 by Land Development
Consultants for the Rose Pointe Condos (parcel lying
immediately north of the subject site). The downstream
system for the subject project is identical to that
described in the attached Off -Site analysis.
OFF -SITE DRAINAGE:
Contours generally fall across the property from the
west to the east and southeast. No off -site runoff
enters the subject parcel. It is bounded on the north
by the Rose Pointe Condos whose storm drainage system
collects and contains all runoff falling on that property.
It is bounded on the west by 76th Avenue West which has
curb and gutter, preventing any street runoff from entering
the property. No runoff enters from the south or east as
contours fall away from the site in those directions.
WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS:
Runoff from the parcel is directed to an existing piped
storm system bordering the subject property along its
east property line. This piped system carries the site
runoff to an ultimate discharge into Hall Creek. Storm
water quantity controls for sites less than one acre
in size, and discharging to a stream have been
utilized for the subject site. Water quality control
is not required as the site has'only 2 outside parking
stalls. Water quantity control will be provided by a
buried 84 inch diameter detention pipe and outlet control
system designed to limit the peak rate of runoff to the
pre -developed condition two-year, twenty-four hour design
storm, while maintaining the pre -developed condition peak
runoff rate for the ten-year twenty-four hour and one -
hundred year, twenty-four hour storms.
OFF -SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS PREPARED IN DECEMBER 1995
BY LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS FOR THE ROSE"POINTE
CONDOS WHICH BORDER THE SUBJECT PARCEL ALONG ITS NORTH
I I
PROPERTY LINE. THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN THIS
ANALYSIS THE THE SAME SYSTEM TO WHICH WE WILL BE DISCHARGING
OUR DETAINED STOPMWATER RUNOFF.
DOWN-STREAMJ)RAINAGE
The off -site drainage down -stream from the property is shown in Figure 3. Surface
water leaves the subject property through the existing catch- basin (station 0+00)
located and the southeast corner of the subject property. The drainage flow then
continues traveling south about 240 feet through an 12" storm drain to another catch
basin on 214th St. SW (sts, 3+40). The drainage flow then travels east along 214th St.
SW through 12" storm drains and five catch basins. to 73rd P1. W. (sta. 5+11). The
drainage flow then travels south along 73rd Pl. W. through 12" storm drains and five
catch basins to 216th St. SW (sta. 10+30). . The drainage flow then travels east along
216th St. SW through a 24" storm drain to station 13+20 and the end of the required
path analysis'. From this point the storm drains appear to continue easterly crossing
State Route 99 and out of the Edmonds City Limits.
All the downstream drainage -facilities appeared to be, functioning adequately. No
significant sedimentation, erosion or * flooding problems were observed in the down-
stream drainage course. Deyplopment of the subject project will not permanently
increase the sedimentation, erosion or flooding in the down -stream drainage courses.
Uq-:U9A BIWI-E. GOODNIGI-I'l-
14PP IT 97 07:56 LAND DEUELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
2064818785
206-672-7837 P.02
TO: 206 672 7837 P02
� I
Z
ko 0
It
S/ -f C.,
710
L
aAV 'PuZZ
Nil sil MY �g, N. wos h 7
all, lj�
IL
cl
00" to uj
2.1
C%j
IQ
AV---A)9L-
E:XMT]3mlrs
.. . .... ..... . ...
&
, Lr
md,
41
(Ij
�q
Nq
ITAN
I�A T4 4, 1
rill
AI
ka
t
Z7,
pi-F
j
to.
M 14 ;A
14
—.4 1
or
qx,
'l A
oil
CA fic*-
WALK
(a 60. T
�A t �A
'I
1 -4 - Ji
vi
tit
fn
tit
STORNWATER MANAGE14ENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
Table 111-1.3 -SCS Western Washington Runoff Curve Numbers
(Published by SCS In 1982) Runoff curve numbers for selected agricultural,
suburban and urban
1&nA tion friv- Tuna IR rninfAll Aiat-ribut-Ann. 24-hour atorm duration.
LAND USE DESCRIPTION
CURVE NUMBERS BY
HYDROLOGIC
SOIL GROUP
A 'B
C
D
ddltiVated iAnd(l)i
Clilt t
winter condition
86 91
�,94
95
,-a
146distilh b0shaireast
46 u nt k In4
low growing�brush grasslands
74 82
89
92
teidqW-6k piitukei
i itit d t# 01
Fbkchards
65 78
85
89
Obod or for4*t lAndt
undisturbed
42 64
76
al
W'. --d 'I
5)c r
young second growth or brush
ss 'i2
ai*
86
Orc r I
with cover crop
81 88
92
94
Opop ipAcenj lawns,
parks, golf courseef, cemeteries,
landscaping
.1
Good condition:
grass cover on k75% of the
68 80
86
90
Fair conditions
r cover on 50-75% of
;r::,
77 as
90
92
the area.
dri4ei toads & parking lotat
-7,6 as
89
91
VIA roads & parking
lots:
72 82
87
89
k,iioiib.6urface9j
pavement', roofs etd.,
98 98
98
98
,bpen Water bodies:
J,
lakes, wetla6de, ponds etc.
100 100
100
100
Singl6 family residential(2)-
Dwelling Unit/Gross
Acre SImpervioua(P)
separate
curve number
i;O DU/dA
is
shall'be
selected for
IiS DU/GA
20
pervious
& impervious
2iD DU/GA
2S
portions
of the
site
2iS DU/GA
30
or basin
3.0 DU/GA
34
3.5 bU/GA
38
4.0 DU/GA
1...42. -
4.5 DU/GA
46
5.0 DU/GA
48
9.5 DU/GA
50
6.0 DU/GA
S2
6.5 DU/GA
54
7.0 DU/GA
56
Oubinj condomi'apartments, %impervious
commercial businesses must be
inddstriil Areas
computed
I
(1) Irojr.a.more detailed description of agricultural land.use curve numbers refer
to National Engineering Handbook, Sec. 4, Hydrology,' Chapter 9j August 19721
.(2) A6iumes roof and drive ' way runoff is directed into atiest/storm system.
(3) The 'remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good
. condition for these curve numbersi
FEBRUARY, 1992
StORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THiE PUGET SOUND BASIN
Ti W travel time (minutes)
L = ilow length (feet)
V W average velocity (feet/sec) and
60 i conversion factor from seconds to minutes
ArIMA of concentration (T,) is t lie gum o f T, values for the various consecutive flow
ie"nts�
Te me T1 + Tt + T
1 2 M
iihore t
T4. time of concentration (minutes) and
number of flow segments
b66aj flow is flow over plane surfaces. It usually occurs in' t�e headwater of
iiirbams. "ith iheet flow, the friction value (nj (a modified Manning's effective
rotighness coefficient that includes the effect of raindrop impacti drag over the
plane 6urfacej obstacles ouch an litteri crop ridges and rockoj and'siddion and
transportation of sediment) is used. - These n, values are for very shallow flow
depthe of about 0.1 foot and are -only used for travel lengths up to 300 feet. Table
ill-i. 4 gives' Manning I a n. values f or sheet. f low f or various surf ace conditions.
�heet flow of up to 300 feetj use Manning's kinematic solution to directly
For
6ompute Tt.
Tt 0 N
42 InLV, -
0.327 6.4
t (P2)
whores
Tj 0 travel time (min),
n. W sheet flow Manning's effective roughness coefficient (from
Table 111-1.4).
L flow length (ft),
2-year, 24-h6ur rainfall (in)' and
P2 11
slope of hydraulic grade line (land slope, ft/ft)
Velocity Equation
A commonly used method of computing average velocity of flowi once It has measurable
depth, in the following equation:
. k
wheret
V velocity (ft/8)
k time of.concentration velocity factor (ft/o)
slope of flow path (ft/ft)
"k" is computed for various land covers and channel characteristids with assumptions
-made for hydraulic radius using the following rearrangement of Manning's equationt
k (1. 49 (R)0-66') /n
R an assumed hydraulic radius
n
Manning's roughness coefficient for open channel flow
FEBRUARY, 1992-
STOP14WATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND'BASIN
table 111-i.4 "n" AND "k" Values Used in Time Calculations for Nydrographe
iin,* Sheet Flow Equation Nanning's Values (for the initial 300 fti of travel)
n.
Imooth surfaces (concrete, asph gravel, or bare. hand p�cked
fiklibw fields or laose @oil surface (no residue)
.0.05
-ddltivatod mail with residue cover (as-0.20 ft/ft)
0.06
dditivatod *oil with residue cover.(n> 0.20 ft/ft)
0.17
grams and lawns
0.1s
W 6 hib grasses
�:.66ttuaa
0.41
grams
(na�ur
0.13
d f, 6t f didit With light underbrush
0.40
lioodi ok.for6st with donee underbrush
0.80
;Manning values for iheet flow only, from Overton and Meadows 1976 (See TR-55, 19"T
"k" Values Used in Travel Time Time of Concentration Calculations
Shallow concentrated Flow (After the initial 300 ft. of shest,flow, R -'0.1)
ke
I . Parest wIth hea�_Ygrouna 11tter and meadows (n - 0.10)
3
2. Brushy ground with some trees (n - 0.060)
5
Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n - 0.040)
-A; Nigh grand (n - 0.035)
9
Short grass, pasture and lawns (n 0.030)
11
6. Nearly bare ground (n 0.25)
13
76 Paved and gravel areas (n - 0.012)
27
thannel Flow (intermittent) jAt the beginning of visible channels R 0.2)'
kc
1. Forested swale with heavy ground-lItter (n 0.10)
5
2. Forested drainage couroo/ravine with defined channel bed (n O�050)
10
3. Rock -lined waterway (n - 0.035)
4; grassed waterway (n - 0.030)
17
S. Earth -lined waterway (n -.0.025)
20
6; CHP pipe (n - 0.024)
21
1; Concrete pipe (0.012)
42
ei Other waterways and pipe 0.508/n
Channel Flow (Continuous stream, R - 0.4) ke
..9e Meandering stream wIth some poole(n - 0.040.1t 20
40i Rock -lined stream (n 0.035) 23
ll. Grass -lined stream (n 0.030) 27
i2i. Other streams, man-made channeI6 and pipe 0.807/n**
FEBRUARY, 1997
4
C3c3-T-*L.s; -T-r4FlC)jRm-A--T,:EC)lW
0
STORMWATER MANAGEHENT FMUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
f
Table 111-1.6 Hydrologic Sail Groups fon Sells In the Puret Sound Basin
too Type
Hydrologic Soil
Group
Soil Type
w
Hydrologic Soil
Group
Agww
Cotter
C
C
Ahl
8
Custer
ND
Alto
C
Dabob
ND
Aidierwood
C
Delphi
D
Atero.q. Mdarwood
It
Dick
ND
Antos, Even"
8
Dimal
D
a
Dupont
D
a
Barlimord
C
C
Edpwick
C
Saunwid
B
Md
Nowntake
8
Elwell
8
C
Esquatzel
Bellingham
D
Everett
A
Bellingham variard
C
Everson
D
Bold"
a
Galvin
D,
now
D
Oetchell
briscot
D
Giles
sueltuf
C
Godfrey
D
Runkof
R
Greenwatei
A
Carey
C
Grove
C
Carlsborg
"D
flardins
C
Cagey
ND
flartalt
ND
Coasolory
C
111011
ND
Cathcart
8
Hokb
ND
Centralia
9
Hoodsport
ND
Chehalis
8
Hoogdol
C
Chesair
A
Hoyptis
ND
ciftew
9
flual
ND
Cullom
C
l[ndionolsk
ND
cu"
8
jonso
a
Ccosw beeches
...variable
Jumpe
ND,
Karo""In
CfD
V.0taloch
C
Kowle
C
Kenton
D
Kilchlo
C
Republic
8
Kitup
C
Riverwash
variable
Klaus
"D
Robef
C
Kjone
MD
Salal
C
Lates
C
Sslkum
B
Leborn
B
Sammantish
D
LAIMMI
ND
Salt Jius"
ND
Lynnwood
ND
Scomman
D
Lystair
ND
Schneider
b
Mal
C
Seattle
D
Manley
a
Seklu
ND
Mashel
B
Sendahmoo
D
Maytown
C
Shalcor
D
Mcv.imli
D
Shona
B
McM6rMy
ND
Shelton
C
Melbounw
8
SI
C
Menzel
ND
Sinclair
C
Mijted,Ajiuvtai
variable
Skipope
D
Moloc"
8
SkykorW&h
B
Muklheo
C/D
SnAhopish
MD
"off
8
Snohondsh
D
N rpt
A
Solduc
B
Zionsi
ND
Solicits
ND
"elk"
A
Spone
D
FEBRUARY, 1991
I'Vi I:,.. i.
dd' city, -I§ low. Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40
4 unoff,184apid, and the hazard of water erosion
seasonal perched water table Is at a depth of.
Inc" has from Janua to March. Springs or seep
b6hiinoh.,
i�!Thb Everet
t 8611 Is Very deep and somewhat
d
b*bGbsIveIy ralned. It formed In glacial outwash.
i',Tyoldally, the SuOace layer, where mixed to a depth of
�i 66W 6 inches, Is Very dark grayish brown gravelly sandy
169hi-I the subsoil Is dark brown very gravelly sandy loam
0 Inches thick. The.. upper part of the substratum
Id'br6wri Vety §faVelly lo *
p amV sand about 5 Inches thick.
r - a to i depth of 60 Inches or more Is dark
t
t1kieffi6ly oravelly sand.
16hrrie4bilitV of the Everett soil Is rapid. Avallabl& water
'Qk6hYAS'IC*-'15fte6tIve rooting depth Is 60 Inches or
fiioid-`AUhbffI§,rspId, and the hazard of water erosion Is
hiodefate
I; ",� this Unit is used mainly as woodland and for wildlife
�-hibfiat. It Is also Used for urban development.
'DbUglas-fit Is the main woodland speci6s'-on' the
"Aiddrwood s
the oil. On the basis of a 100-year site curve,
m6an site Index Is 142. On the basis of a 50-year
.6116 curve. the mean site Index Is 108. The mean annual
4 Increment at culmination (CMAI) for Douglas -fir at age-65,
146 cubic feet per acre.
b6tiglas-fir Is the main woodland species on the
bred poll. On the basis of a 100-year site curve,
, 'M60,014e Index Is, i4l. On the basis of a 50-year slt��-'
Wrvd,'the mean site Index Is 111. The mean annuaf-,
1p. "i6dibirrient at culmination (CMAI) for Douglas -fir at 6'(? 65
ISH 46 6ubic feet per acre. 9
mong th
I a trees of limited extent on thls*unit are
hemidck, Western redcedar, and red alder.
A
mdng t a common forest understory plants are salal,
i't �4.&eroreen huckleberry, brackenfern, red huckleberry,
6omMon rose; and.Oregon-grape.
fid4ill. '-,'.thd main limitation for the harvesting of timber is
steepness of slope. Slope restricts the use of wheeled
drid tracked equipment In skidding operations; cable
.,it ardin systems generally are safer and disturb the soils
lass: Narvesting systems that lift logs entirely oft the
d d the disturbance of the protective layer of
Nroun re uce
du
�il,�,`,16gging roads teoulre suitable surfacing for year-round
Use. Rock for road construction is not readily available
on this unit. Esta
blishing plant cover on steep road cut
-i and fill slopes teduces erosion. Steep yarding paths, skid
trails, and firebreaks are subject to rilling and gullying
unless adequate Water bars are provided or they are
tected by plant cover.
'Seedling mortality Is the main limitation for the
pfoduction of timber. Reforestation can be accomplished
bY Planting DoUglas-fir seedlings. If seed trees are
natural reforestation of cutover'Areas by red
'aidef occurs periodically. The high tem
perature and low
.,moisture content of the Everett soil during the growing
i:-,i§eason cause high mortality of seedlings, especially
Soil survey
those on south- and southwest -facing slopes. When
openings are made In the canopy, invading brushy
plants, If not controlled, can delay the establishment of
seedlings. Because the rooting depth Is restricted by a
cemented pan In the Alderwood soil, trees are subject to
windthrow.
The main limitations of the Alderwood soil for septic
tank absorption fields and homesites are steepness of
slope and a seasonal perched water table. Effluent from
absorption fields flows laterally above the pan and can
seep. at the bottom of slopes. Drainage Is needed If
buildings with basements and crawl spaces are
con§tructed. This soil sloughs readily when saturated.
The main limitations of the Everett soil for septic tank
absorption fields are -steepness of slope and seepage. If
the density of houslHo'ii'moderati to high, community
sewage systems are needed to prevent contamination of
water supplies as a result of seepage from onsite
sewage disposal sypten1s, Road cuts tend to slough
readily.
. to protect the soils In this unit from erosion during
construction, disturbed areas need to be seeded and
runoff should be controlled. i
This map unit Is In capability subclass Vile.
5-"Aldetwood.;Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent
slopesi This Map Unit Is on till plains. Areas are Irregular
vih shapi§'ind are 100 to 1,000 acres In size. The native
.,',4egetatlon Is mainly conifers. Elevation is 50 to 550 feet.
'-The average annual precipitation Is about 40 Inches, the
average annual air temperature Is about 50 degrees F,
and the average frost -free season Is 170 to i9l) days.
This unit Is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy
loam and about 25 percent Urban land. The components
of this unit are so Intricately Intermingled that It was not
practical to map them separately at the scale used.
Included In this unit are small areas of McKenna and
Norma soils and Terric.M'edisaprists In depressional
areas and drainagaways on plains. Also Included are
small areas of soils that are very shallow over a
hardpah4 small areas of Everett, Indianolai and Ragnar
soils on terraces and butwash plains; and soils that have
a stony and bouldery surface layer. Included areas make
up about 15 percent of the. total acreage.
The Aiderwood soil Is moderately deep over a hardpan
and Is moderately well drained. It formed In glacial till.
Typically, the surface layer Is very dark grayish brown
gravelly sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The upper part
of the subsoil Is dark yellowish brown and dark brown
very gravelly sandy loam about 23 Inches thick. The
lower part Is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about
5 Inches thick., A weakly cemented hardpan is at a depth
of about 35 InbOes. Depth to the hardpan ranges from
20 to 46 Inches.
Petineability of the'Aiderwood soil Is moderately rapid
above the hardpan and very slow through it. Available .
water capacity Is low. Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40
inches. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion
County Area, Washington
, lg� - slight. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of
V18 to 36 Inches from January to March.
Urban land Is areas that ate covered by streets,
i�bdllding6; parking lotsi and other structures that obscure
.�*:Alter the -soils go that Identification Is not possible.
4,31he * Aldetw6od soil In. this unit Is used mainly for.
,'Oatks, building sites, lawns, gardens, Arid woodland.
.1.jhe main limitations of the Alderwood soil for
dinesites and septic tank absorption fields are the
�,"deipth to thehlardpan and the seasonal. perched water
Ftable: Onsite Waste disposal systems often fall or do not
erly during periods of high rainfall. Drainage
buildings with basements and crawl spaces
4r'e' constructed. Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during
;Ilte Oroparation and subsequently used to cover the
,.exposed material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are
�deslrable prior to seeding grass for lawns.
This map unit Is In capability subclass lVe.
ii�—Alderwood-Urban land complex, 8 to 16.percent
iwpd, � This map unit Is on till plains. Areas are irregular
!.In 6ha'pe and are 25 to 100 acres in size. The native
. 4 , vegetation Is mainly conifers and hardwoods. Elevation Is
60 to 550 feet. The average annual precipitation Is about
f 1,40 Inches, the average annual air temperature is about
-60 degrees Fj and the average frost -free season is 170
W,Vto i90 days.
this -unit Is about 60 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy..
1.. 3 *.
jkliAoarn and about 25 percent Urban land. The components
-,,.,of this unit are so Intricately Intermingled that It was not
I - practical to map them separately at the sca ' loused.
? , , viarett and
_i Included In this unit are small areas of E �
Indianola soils on terraces and outwash plains, Kitsap
'soils on terraces and terrace escarpments, and Ragnar
soils on outwash plains. Included areas ma e up a out
jS percent of the total acreage.
The Alderwood soil Is moderately deep and
moderately well drained. It formed in glacial till.. Typically,
the surface layer Is very dark grayish brown gravelly
,�';,"'sandy loam about 7 Inches thick. The upper part of the
V�;:- iubsbil is dark yellowish brown and dark brown very
gravelly sandy loam about 23 inches thick. The lower
part Is olive brown very gravelly sandy loam about 5
Inches thick. A weakly cemented hardpan Is at a depth
of about 35 Inches. Depth to the hardpan ranges from'
20 to 40 inches.
Permeability of the Alderwood soil is moderately rapid
above the hardpan and very slow through it. Available
water capacity Is low. Effective rooting depth Is 20 to 40
Inches. Runoff Is slow, and the hazard of water erosion
Is glight. A seasonal perched water table is at a depth of
18 to 36 Inches from January to March.
i, , Urban land consists of areas that are covered by -
flo streets, buildings, parking lots, and other structures that
�1 obscure or alter the soils so that Identification Is not
I possible.
The Aiderwood soil In this unit'is used mainly for
parks, building sites, lawns, and woodland.
13
The main limitations of the Alderwood soil for
homesites and septic tank absorption fields are the
depth to the hardpan and wetness because of the
seasonal perched water table. Drainage Is needed If
buildings with basements and crawl spaces are
constructed. Onsite sewage di * sposal systems often fall,41.
or do not function properly during periods of high rainfall. i
Topsoil needs to be stockpiled during site preparation
and subsequently used to cover the exposed underlying
material. Additions of fertilizer and peat are desirable,
prior to seeding grass for lawns.
This -map unit is in capability subclass lVe.
7—Bellingham silty clay'loam. This very deep, poorly,
drained soil is in depressional areas. It formed in
alluvium and lacustrine sediment. Areas are regular in
shape and are about 2 to 25 acres in size. The native
vegetation Is mainly grass and sedges. Elevation Is 60 to
800 feet. Slooe is 0 to 3 percent. The average annual
precipitation is about 45 inches, the average annual air'
temperature i� about 50 degrees Fj and the average
frost -free season is 160 to 180 days. . : '
. Typically, the surface layer Is very dark gray silty clay,,:
loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil to a depth of 60
inches or more is mottled, gray and olive silty clay.
Included in this unit are small areas of Terric
Medisap . rists, very poorly drained organic soils, Norma
soils along upland drainageways, Kitsap and Pastik soils
Qn terraces,l,'And Bellingham soils that have been,
-0.631ned. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the -
tbtal acreabe. - - I
Permeability of this Bellingham soil Is slow. Available''�,J.
water capAcIty is high. Effective rooting depth Is limited
by a seasonal high water table that is at a depth of 0 to:..
about 12 inches from November to June. Runoff is very -
slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Ponding i
occurs from' November to June.
This unit is used for pasture, woodland, urban
development, and wildlife habitat.
This unit is suited to pasture if the excess water on the
surface -is removed. Tile drains or open ditches can be,-,�. i
used If suitable outlets are available. Grazing when the.
soil in this unit Is wet results In compaction of the i, , �,'
surface layer, poor tilth, and reduced Infiltration. Use of j,,
proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted
grazing during wet periods helps to. keep.the pasture In I ,
good condition. Proper grazing practices, weed control.- ti�, J
and fertilizer are needed for maximurn quality of forage.'',
This unit Is suited to red alder. On the basis of a 50-
year site curve, the mean site Index Is 83. The mean,-. id-,,
annual Increment at culmination (CMAI) for red alder atl,'l
age 40 Is 89 cubic feet per acre. Among the trees of
limited extent on this� unit are Douglas -fir, bigleaf maple,
western redcadar, and western hemlock. Among the,.
common forest understory plants are trailing blackberryj
western swordfern, thimbleberry, salmonberry, and il 11 4
huckleberry.
The main limitation for the harvesting of timber Is soil 1;
wetness, which limits the use of equipment to dry
4C JNAI C7 LJ T,
C- A kx. (DSX
16
Ir Cl)
4-7 4,r"it t ?i
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
S.C.S. TYPE71A DISTRIBUTION
2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM 1.50" TOTAL PRECIP.
--------------------------------------------------------------- -
�.�':-,ENTER:.A(PERV)r CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO.
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
;7 .7 - 81.0 .0 A 25.0
�PEAK-,Q(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
i02 8.00 820
-------------
S.C.S. TYPE-lA DISTRIBUTION
10-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM 2.00" TOTAL PRECIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV), A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR BASIN NO.
0.72,81,0,0,25
DATA PRINT-OUT:
AREMACRES) PERVIOUS
A CN
.7 .7 81.0
''PEAk-Q(.CFS) T-PEAK(HRS)
8.00
IMPERVIOUS
A ..CN
.0. .0
VOL(CU-FT)
1575
Td(MINUTES)
25.0.
- ---------- -------------------------
S.C.S. TYPE -IA DISTRIBUTION
100-YEAR 24-HOUR STORM
3.00" TOTAL PRECIP.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTER: A(PERV), CN(PERV)i A(IMPERV), CN(IMPERV), TC FOR 13ASIN NO.
0.72i8l,0,0,25
DATA PRINT -PUT:
AREMACRES) PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS TC(MINUTES)
A CN A CN
.7 .7 81.0 .0 .0
25.0
PEAK-Q'(CFS) T-PEAK(HRS) VOL(CU-FT)
�16 7.83 3415