21315 76TH AVE W.PDF111111111111
6327
21315 76TH AVE W
Ac�'Iln / T
NO
CITY OF EDMONDS
Address of Construction
Property Legal Description (Include all easements):
SIDE SEWER PERMIT
U)"l
PERMIT �'110 88 6 7
zl_ U
IIA BALLINGER
LIFT STATION
I
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 1997
'UBLIG WORKS
Owner and/or Co t t L-A-&-4 IV f f f (A- k-4 IF VV
State License N C 0 u ing Permit No.
C1 Single Family Invasion into City Right -of -Way: 11 No Yes
-Farnily (No.
ErMulti of Units RW Construction Permit I'No.
El Commercial Cross other Private Property:k No El Yes
C3 Publ ic Attach legal description and copy of recorded easement
1��/y t-hat I have read a I com
,�h a p y ity requirements
46-Wdicated on the back'o,� theVermit Card.
z -Z4!:� - 4?
Date
CALL DIAL -A -DIG (1-800-424-5555) BEFORE ANY EXCXVATION
OFFICE USE.,ONLY.
FOR INSPECTION CALL-7"-
SN2, PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
60-00
Permit Fee: - Issued By
-3 Trunk Charge: 00 Date Issued:
Assessment Fee- / 5 2,Z- - Z-0 Receipt No.: /00 VV
Lid No.:- ck; IwsP. -ro GQ^Z*
Partial Inspection: �WM TAO (0/10/97 ONN. 7-/IA7 Date -Initial
Comments
Reason Rejected: Date -Initial
Final Inspection Approved: Date Initial
** PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB SITE **
White Copy; File Greeri Copy: Inspector Buff Copy: Applicant . Revised 3 90
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map (s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewer stubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
Side Sewer Drawing
The City of Edmonds EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION [-] REPAIRS Ej LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . .................. Y?
OWNER ...... &qP4-n-'kt ..... 61-PS .... CPr,*t ........................ CONTRACTOR ......................................... * ....... ............ * ---------- PERMIT NO. ... 8-47.
JOB ADDRESS .... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO . ...................................... BLOCK NO . ............................ .......
.4.� .................. ............................ 4.. ...
............. ............................................................. ......................... ........
NAME OF ADDITION .......................................................... 1.
LO tc/0 I I �" N-
jl� G �-, car.
0,rs,49-
Approved:
c /Or I t,
Ov� rroms%-�!.
— + to /
0
t, Fc.,6 Aw
0V\ 04alA
6 14, 0"-P
c, 0PV c
to WaF
C V rb 4cb
5," j le !:
PWW-0001-11/75(REV.11/78) DATE ............. /"Z.... By .............................
The City of Edmonds Water Service Drawing EASEMENT NO . ............................................
NEW CONSTRUCTION REPAIRS71 LID NO . .................. . ASMT. NO . ..................
OWNER ........... CONTRACTOR ..... Gncm:xm-tw4--T ....... RRCiTtleO.A.5 .... C.9NS.T.-. PERMIT NO. W034.G
97 OD -3 4
...... ........ .... .. -7- 0.3.
JOB ADDRESS !W .. ..... 7G--"--A,-4F . ..... W.I ..... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT.NO . ......................... ....... BLOCK NO .............. 4.1
2- 1 -21
..................................................................................................................................................................
2.1'51B-7(drH
9703-44
j'/t'C0PF*-e
S ucrz
P ?
12:
NAMEOF ADDITION ..: ......................................... * ..........................
I
"Cappee
2:, P F-
_PF— trao Psl.
Z"Supev."1�4 I.P.S. -
2. 13 17 '766-r64
9-70IS49
15
2." P. E. * -
z"r-appep. Te-E-s
01
2'.or
up.Aa5 t
capmvt I
5 1
-9/12/97
Approved: PAQ
PWW-0001 -11175 (REV. 11 /78) DATE SePT.-..3.%A99.T. B, ....... �- V ............
:r
I-
Q9
11111111111111
15186
21315 76TH AVE W
J�
C.
ED
City 9f Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
t77 -/& /
Permit Number: I I
Wue Date:__6 - 2-6-1
PERMIT
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: _2.43,1 S' -71 -,A
-r.,— r uri, n— .4 10 4 .1 a ev _1A
I A C. IS91)
Contractor: 3 Quil
_rContact:
Mailing Address: A() 7�nx (.69 CbPffPA2bSPhone: 44o e)x�� - '3072, 29!Z-
State License #: Zbnl IN) M-40 Liability Insurance: Bond: $
Building Permit # (if applicable): 4R93 Vie -..-3-W Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable): 98(�
E. E] Commercial E] E] City Project [J Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi-Faniily EJ Single Family Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete, Cut Yes 0No G. Size of Cut: x H. Chargq�_$
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessftom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not. limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense costs and attorneyfees by reason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT
i
Two sets of construction drawings of proposed work required with permit application. v I'%
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.
Work and material is'to be inspected during,progress and at completion. JUN 2 7 1997
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times. ENG.1NEER1N"*:1
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the, City Engineer.
All street cut trench work shall be patchedwith asphalt orCityapprioved material priorto the end ofthe workingday;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above stalein . ehis an un2cerstand the perinit requirements and the pink copy of the permit ivill'be
available on site
,v"all timesfor ins ect' n purposes.
Signature: Date:
TTcrront actor or Agen�t�
C �LZIAL-A-DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLN'
ISSUED BY;
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng*Di� 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 111 Route copy to Street Dept.)
Comments:
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
1-�J
!24 ItO,--
PA
7pp-
ru
fnc. ,SoQ
Qty'.bf Edmonds
RIGHT -OF- WAY. CONSTRUCTION
FhFk-MJL JL '9
Permit Number.
IssueDate:
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: 11 tile -lit 4102:—
B. Type of Work'(be specific): zo,or— 91( Pvc- -M
I-ISED NEW ApAanrA)r (b)"Pucx
C. Contractor: Contact: -rm
Mailing Address: _'4M "fs+w —474 Phone: -7w-SA40
State License #: !!:, �vj& rz Li a Y, o , o A Liability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
S ide Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
E. F1 Commercial 0,
] Subdivisi 'a [:1 City Project E] Utility (PUD, GTE,
Multi -Family E] Single Family EJ Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut Yes %No G. Size of Cut: x
APPLICANT TO READ AND SIGN
H,-. Charge
e
'ATER)
INDEMNITY: Applicant understands and by his signature to this application to hold the City of Edmonds harmlessfrom injuries, damages, or claims ofany
kind or description whatsoever, foreseen�or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, includingornot linutedtothe defense ofany legal proceedings including d�fense costs and attorneyfees byreason of granting this permit.
THE CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL INSPEC-
TION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREETPATCHIS C01iPLETED
BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO THE APPLICANT
Two sets of construction,drawings of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. Please call the Engineerini Division, 771-0220.
Work and material is to be inspected during progress and at cornpletion.
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Publi'd-,Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by theCity Engineer.
All street cut trench work shall be patched with asphalt or City approved material prior to the end of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy. of the permit will be!
available on site
,a( all times J69tspection purposes.
Signature:
MWO W, MR, ur,
iTnfractor or Agent)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK'
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BN': RIGHT OF WAY FEE:
TIME AUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER lo DAVS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND I 11:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE,:
T 0 TAL FEE:
,.,.RECEIPT NO.,:
ISSUED BY,, -
I
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR
ISSUANCE Eng. Div 1997
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund 11.1 Route copy to Street Dept.)
Comments:
" !��: .!. � i" , -, . ;
Difigiam
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION YES NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
,=Q L3) -7 -71o4k AV \N
'�4 -q-7 -TEA
Al=�V IW4 �/ :5��46nL_ I I
LiATv PEDE15TA)
.211 Pv�-
J-)3117
N 1-7 w C-
8 --AMENF— q 1�)
9 0 - I �
'7*7�7`7�7"713
U f -E
ty':'o on&
RIGHT-OF-WAY� CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT
r
Permit Numbe
hisue Date:
A. Addressor Vicinity of Consiru6tion: 21317 76 AV W (97163-15)
B. Type of Work (be specific): Install 55' of 1-1/4" MPE IP on 76 AV W
from 25' W to East edge of ROW @ 310' + — N CA 214 St SW
C. Contractor: Puget Sound Energy
Mailing Address: 1122 75 St SW Everett
- State License #: 98203
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
contact: Mastmne Kingsbury
Phone: 356- 7500 X7596
Liability Insurance: Bond:$
Side Sewer Permit. # (if applicable):
E. Commercial E) Subdivision City Project (M Utility (PUD,GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
Multi -Family E] Single Family Other
INSPECTOR: INSPECTOR: wkJcgH
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut: Yes 0No 3 G. Size of Cut: x H. Chaxgo�_$
/
L APP* LICANT TO READ A D SIGN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to hold the City ofEdmondg harmless from injuries, damages, or
claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeseen, that may be made against the City of Edmonds, or any of its departments or
employees, including or not limited to the defense ofany legalproceedingg including.defense costs, and attorney fees by reason ofgranting thi8permit.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE FINAL
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. ESTIMATED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UNTIL THE FINAL STREET PATCH
IS COMPLETEO BY CITY FORCES, AT WHICH TIME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED FOR ISSUANCE TO
R
Construction drawing of proposed work required with permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please' call the Engineering Division, 771-0220.JUN 3 0 1997
Work and material is to be insp ected during progress and at completion. ENGINEERING
Restoration is ' to be in accordance with City Codes.
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance'with City regulations as required by the City Engineer.
All street cut ditches -shall be patched with asphalt or City a0pr oved material prior to the end of the working day;
NO EXCEPTIONS. I-
Ihave read the above statements and understand thepermit requirements and thepink copy of thepermit will be
available on site at all times for inspectiot purposes.
Signature: r fdA glg4g& y 1 A!rr�=41!�ulte. ?z
_49" 19 6z 1 - -
(Cohtractq�(jAgerlt)
CALL DIAL -A -DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
FOR CITY USE ONLY
APPROVED BY:
TIMEAUTHORIZED: VOID AFTER A06 2 DAYS
RIGHT OF WAY DEPOSIT
DISRUPTION FEE/FUND Ill:
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: RESTORATION FEE:
PERMIT FEE:
TOTAL FEE:
COMMENTS: RECEIPT FEE:
DATE: ISSUED BY:,
NO WORK SHALL BEGIN PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE
Eng. Div. 1994
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES
Comments:
Diagram.:
(Fund -111 - Route copy to Street Dept.)
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION El YES El NO
Partial Work Inspection by P.W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
4�!' S t . 1 SqQ
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.:
LOCATION:
CITY OF EDMONDS
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX (206) 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
I CITY OF EDMONDS
Bruce Goodnight
V 97-40
BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
21317 76th Avenue West (see Exhibit A, Attachments 1, 2 and 4).
APPLICATION: A variance for an 8-foot fence on top of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining
wall where the maximum permitted combined fence and retaining
wall height of 6 feet is allowed. The requested variance has been
proposed to'mitigate potential impacts to the exist) condominium
to the south of the proposed development (see Exhibit. A,
Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6).
REVIEW PROCESS,: Variance; Hearing Examiner conducts public hearing and makes
final decision.
MAJOR ISSUES:
a. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 17 (FENCE
HEIGHT).
b. Compliance with Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20
(VARIANCES).
Description of Proposal
Application by Bruce Goodnight to install an eight toot high fence along the, south property top
of a 2 to 4 foot high retaining wall. The proposed fence is intended to mitigate impacts to the
existing condominium to the south of the proposed development. The F fence is a requirements
placed on the subject property by the ADB as part of its approve D 12 unit multiple family
complex (File No. ADB-97-12 1) (see Exhibit A, Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6)
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION AND DECISION:
Staff Recommendation:
Hearing Examiner Decision:
Approve with conditions
Approve with conditions
e Incorporated August 11, 1890 9
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING:
After reviewing the official file which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and
after visiting the site, the Hearing Exa m*iner conducted a public hearing on the application. The
hearing on the application was opened at 9:05 a.m., May 1, 1997, in the Plaza Room, Edmonds
Library, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 9:08 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and
the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording of the -hearing is
available in the Planning Division.
HEARING COMMENTS:
The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing.
From the City:
Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor, entered the staff report into the record and
recommended approval of the request with conditions.
From the Applicant:
-Bruce Goodnight, applicant, said he concurred with the conditions and said that the
proposed retaining wall and fence will provide privacy for the adjacent neighbors.
From the Community:
No one from the general public spoke at the hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
A. Site Description
I
1. Site Development And Zoning:.
a) Facts:
(1) Size: The subject property is 32,228 square feet in area. The proposed fence
would be located along the south property line (see Exhibit A, Attachment 4).
(2) Zoning: The zoning of the subject property is Residential, multiple family, 2.400
square feet of lot area required per dwelling unit (RM 2.4).
(3) Existing and Proposed Development: ' The site is currently vacant. A single family
building was recently moved off the site to allow the construction of a new 12
unit multiple family development. The ADB has granted approval of the design of
the new building, and the applicant has applied for building permits.
(4) Terrain'and Vegetation: The subject property slopes gently down to the east away
from 76th Avenue West, and then slopes down steeply at the eastern end of the
property to the adjacent developments. All vegetation has been removed from the
site in preparation for construction. The applicant is proposing to redevelop the
site with ornamental landscaping around the perimeter of the site (see Exhibit A,
Attachment 4).
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 3
2. Neighboring Development And Zoning:
a) Facts:
(1) North: Developed with a 12 unit multiple I family dwelling complex. and
zoned RM 2.4.
(2) South Developed with a 12 unit multiple family dwelling complex. and zoned
RM 2.4.
(3) East: Developed with a large multiple family dwelling complex and zoned CG
under a contract rezone.
(4) West: Currently under constructioll with a new high school. and zoned Public
Use (P).
b) Conclusion: The proposed development would be consistent with the surrounding
zoning and development.
B. Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Compliance
1. Compliance with RM 2.4
2. Zoning Standards
a) Facts:
(1) The fundamental site development standards in a RM 2.4 zone are set forth in
Chapter 16.30.
(2) The proposed building and site development conforms to all RM 2.4
requirements.
(3) ECDC Chapter 17.30 state's the standards by which fences may be developed,
including height. The standards from which the applicant is requesting relief are:
"Unless a variance isfirst obtained no fence or hedge shall be more than 6jeet in
height as measuredfrom the top of thefence to the lowest original grade "(ECDC
17.30.000(Q). and
"When a retaining wall tree feet or greater -is contiguous to and below a proposed
fence, the proposedjence may be constructedfor the purposes of safety not greater
thanfourfeet above the top of the retaining wall or the finished grade, whichever is
less. " (ECDC 1730.000(D)).
b) Conclusion: As conditioned the proposal complies with the development standards
for RM 2.4 zones as set forth in Chapter 16.30 and 17.30 except the standard for
which the applicant is seeking a variance.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 4
3. Compliance with requirement for a Variance
ECDC Chapter 20.85 (Variances) states an applicant may request a variance from the
standards of this Chapter pursuant to the procedures set forth in ECDC Chapter 20.85.
Chapter 20.85 of the ECDC also sets forth the mechanism whereby a provision of' the
Code may be varied on a case -by -case basis if the application of the provision would
result in an unusual and unreasonable hardship (see Exhibit A, Attachment 2).
a), Facts:
(1) ECDC Section 20.85.010 establishes the decisional criteria with which a variance
request must comply in order to he granted by the Hearing Examiner. These
criteria include: a special circumstance must exist; no special privilege is granted.
the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code; the
proposal will not be detrimental and is the minimum necessary.
(2) Variances may be used to modify bulk standards. They may not be used to,
modify use or procedural requirements.
(3) The applicant states that special circumstances exist due to the adjacent
development. "The proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums are situated between two
existing condominium projects. The adjacent Rose Pointe Condominiums are to
the north with the rear yards facing the site. The adjacent Stratford Square
Condominiums are to the, south with their rear yards facing the proposed project.
The proposedJence is to buffer the impact of the two adjacent rear yards. that of
the proposed Rose Ridge, and the adjacent Stratford Square Condominiums. as
required I—v the ADB.
(4) The applicant states that the proposal would not he a grant of special privilege as
other fence ' height variances have been- granted by the City of Edmonds- for
buffering adjacent properties. Many of the other sites which used taller fences to
buffer impacts are buffering commercial impacts from existing multiple family
developments. These sites include the Top Foods site and the Funtasia site. One
case where an impact from a new Multiple Family project was buffeted from an
existing Multiple Family site was at the Cottage Crest Condominiums on 196th
Street Southwest.
(5) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
.and by developing multiple family while protecting privacy.
(6) The applicant states that the proposal is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance as
the applicant is developing twelve units where the zoning allows twelve units.
(7) The applicant states that the proposal will not be detrimental as the fence was
required by the ADB to mitigate privacy reduction impact.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40,-
Page 5
(8) The applicant states that this is the minimum variance because, based on
testimony by adjacent property owners, the ADB recommended that the height of
the fence be allowed to be eight feet along the southern property line.
(9) The proposed design has been approved by the ADB with the condition that the
applicant obtain a variance to allow the proposed fence height (file No.
ADB-96121 ) (see Exhibit A, Attachment 6).
b) Conclusions:
(1) Special Circumstances
Special circumstances include the size. shape, topography, location or
surroundings of the property and public necessity for public structures.
Special circumstances exist for this proposal due to the location or surrounding..
of the property. Specifically. the condominium project to the'north is oriented
with the drive aisle on the north side and the backyards on the south side, while
the condominium project on the south is oriented with the drive aisle on the south
side and the backyards on the north side. This requires the backyards of the
proposed project to face the backyards of an existing project.
(2) Special Privilege
It does not appear that any special privilege will be demonstrated in granting'this
variance as other fence height variances have been granted by the City 'of
Edmonds for buffering adjacent properties.
(3) Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan
Approval of the proposed variance would allow for the development of the site in
a manner consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive
Plan designation of the site while preserving privacy of adjacent properties. -
(4) Not Detrimental
Approval of the variance would not be detrimental to the public health. safety or
welfare because the proposal is intended to reduce detrimental impacts.
(5) Minimum Required
The request is the minimum necessary to reduce the possible impacts of tile
proposal on adjacent properties.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 6
C. Technical Committee
1. Engineering Division Comments
a) Fact: The Engineering Division has commented that the height of the fence. adjacent
to 76th Avenue West must not he allowed at a height which would create a vehicle
sight obstruction for vehicles entering and exiting 76th Avenue West.
b) Conclusion: A condition should be incorporated into the decision stating that the
applicant must obtain a building permit for the proposed fence, and that the fence
must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division with
respect to vehicle sight distance.
2. Other Comments
a) Fact: No other City Divisions or Departments submitted comments.
D. Critical Areas Ordinance
1. Facts:
a) The subject proposal is subject to review under ECDC Chapter 20.1 SB (Critical
Areas Ordinance).
b) The applicant has submitted a Critical Areas Checklist, and the City has issued a
Waiver from the requirement to prepare a Critical Areas Study (File No CA-96-21 1)
2. Conclusion: The applicant has complied with the requirements of the ECDC Chapter
20.15B.
DECISION
Based upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, the request for a variance is approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. This variance is to allow the proposal in the location identified on the proposed site plan
(see Exhibit A, Attachment 4). Any other structures, additions or remo dels would have to
conform with the typical setbacks or height requirements for the zone or the
applicant/property owner would be required to obtain an additional -variance.
2. This application is subject to the applicable requirements contained in the Edmonds
Community Development Code. It is the responsibility. of the applicant to ensure
compliance with the various provisions contained in these ordinances.
3. The applicant must obtaining a building permit for the proposed fence.
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 7
4. The fence must comply with the regulations of the City of Edmonds Engineering Division
pertaining to vehicle site distance obstruction.
5. The permit is transferable.
Entered this 9th day of May, 1997, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner
under Chapter 20. 100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds.
Aon McConnell
Hearing Examiner
RECONSIDERATIONS AND APPEALS
The following is a summary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and
appeals. Any person wishing to file or respond to a recommendation or appeal should
contact the Planning Department for further procedural information.
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Section 20.100.010.G allows for' the Hearing, Examiner to reconsider his decision or
recommendation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the
initial decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register
and/or presents testimony or by any person holding an ownership interest in a tract of land
which is the- subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must
cite specific references to the findings and/or the criteria contained -in the ordinances
governing the type of application being reviewed.
APPEALS
Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or
recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made in writing, and shall include the
decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the
name of the individual or group appealing the decision, their interest in the matter, and
reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with
the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the
decision being appealed.
LAPSE OF APPROVAL
Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is
required, substantially commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval,
the conditional use permit shall expire and be nu*ll and void, unless the owner files an
application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.'
Hearing Examiner Decision
Case No. V-97-40
Page 8
NOTICE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR
The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the Hearing Examiner request
a change inthe valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessors Office.
EXHIBIT:
The following exhibit was offered and entered into the record.
A. Planning Division Advisory Report
PARTIES OF RECORD:
Bruce Goodnight
Goodnight Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 669
Edmonds, WA 98020
Edmonds Planning Division
Edmonds Public Works Division
Edmonds Engineering Division
Edmonds Parks & Recreation Division
Edmonds Fire Department
PROJECTREVIEW CHECKLISTI'-
�.iAN
PROJECT NAME;,
CHE(
01
7�! -Z
PROJECT ADDRE
7 16
RECEIPT DATE:�'
EVIEW D'BY:-
n la A�
LAN., WATER
.. ............ ...
:'-FIRE,-.*-
--BLDG. -- SEWER''
STRE EY
1E G...
Setbacks/Variance/Setback Adjustment
Conditional Use Permit
ADB Requirements
Cther Zoning Requirements
Underground Wiring Required A`**�Nk�k, gz.
Lot Slope IS% <�, / , I , V �` 1. alt=
SEPA Environmental Checkfist/Hydra�licsP46&mit w1m.1111
Tree Cuttino Plan /141 U WIN M.-
Legal Description Verification W-01-41w
RUN —9, I'll .5tv" -, NAW I
Quit Claim/Street Dedications
Easements - Public/Private 6z,\X�,
Engineering Storm Drain R4%,��6
WWON . 11 ~111-11' 1 AA M
Engineering 2.2 Inspecti*We'k-3X3Xo 96o . . . . . . . . . .....
Drainage Plan (On-Sitwk-
Setback - Top of Bank,Nftm—. Water Courses
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Setback - Storm Drain LInW-/ . . . . . . . . . .
!3z
Open Ditch - Existing
Culvert Required
Culvert Size
..............
Shoulder Drainage/Shale Open Runoff
Catch Basin Reoulred 4e-,
e & Vehicle Access
LETL��uired Im"I �Wkllm��mm
Curb & Gutter Required M-1--mo-1 MINIM
vmlmm��wfflmmm
W Mg o7K4MI
'!Street Paving Required A
0 LUS&ILL& YAZA.01 I P-tf M"' to' IN
Street Name Sig-n-Required
Other Signing Required
m 0 WE 311 M ummo 11; m �
FEMA Map Check/Water Table WERE �17-%
= -I i EA1. mu
W—Z
Side *Sewer Availability
m
�wl �5201
Create Street File M.
Water Rte—terSize 1-81
ON
Service Line Size
llw"��
V= FOUM
It,
_H�an�tRequired
�Mm
Hydrant Size Existing W. Z111 111 � ffil::111 112,01,
WMZA 1
�=U
WE
MAAMUFA��MM
Reviewed By:
FIRE
PLANNING
j AA
ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIOVORKS DEpj
PERMITAPPLICATIONREQUIRIDIENTS
o: Applicant
rom: Jamal Mahmoud, Engineering Inspector
"ne,.
.ddress: PlanCheckNo:
141— Date. E
Iwo-, / - __ .
fter review of the subject permit application, the following requirements must be met
Construction hours are: WEEKDAYS — 7:00 A-M,40:00 P.IVL;WEEIKENDSIHOLI)DAYS — 10:00 A.M.-6:00 P.M.
A separate RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION PERMIT is'reqnired for all work on public property. (ECDC 1&60)
Truck haul mute plan must be submitted and approved prior toLpermit issuance.
Builder/owner is responsible for containing all temporary runoff and erosion control on site (ECDC 1830.030d).
NO WORK SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 15 FEET OF STREAMS OR 10 FEET FROM ANY CLOSED D"AGE
FACILITY. BUELDER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWING.
(ECPC 18.30.50G)
FELTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION.
(ECDC 1&30)
INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, TIGHTLINES AND CATCH BASIN
INSTALLATION. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR To BAC"ELLING. (ECDC 18.30)
Repair or replace all defective existing curb. gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the property. If an intersection is involved, a handicap ramp
may be required. Contractor shall meet with the City Engineering staff to determine the extent of repair prior to issuance of the permit-
(ECDC 1&90)
Driveway slope shall not exceed 14% without a waiver. Every attempt should be made to keep the slope below 14%. Waiver granted to
2-y - %. . (ECDC 18.80.060D)
Driveways must be paved fromi property line to City RIGHT-O&WAY. A separate permit is required. (ECDC 18.80.060C)
INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED ON DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS PRIOR TO AND AFTER POURING. (ECDC 18-30)
No burning of construction refuse without a permit from the Fire Department
Connection to City water systern is required. There is a sepatate charge.for the water meter (ECD.0 7.20).-
A back water valve is required if downstaiis plumbing is below the elevation of upstream manhole. (ECDC 7.20)
Water and sewer main lines should be separated by 10 feet minimum. (ECDC 18.10)
Connection th City sanitary system is required- A separate permit is requireA
LID# Fees paid: Yes NO ChargeL 55 - -
(ECDC 18.10)
Undergrotmd wiring is required on all new construction, and for additions, alterations, and repairs that exceed 50% of the total assessed
value of the structure. (EcDC 1&90)
A FINAL ENGINEERING INSPiCTION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING DIVISION GRANTING OCCUPANCY
OF THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. (ECDC IMO)
ATAMDW
' L --S-3'
f � %
STREFT FILE -
MAR f 7
PERIWIT Coot4r
wiv
ROT- 11*0 tivr-4o-
42D + 4%1, 'f kv. 4w 444, 's OUIE wz
AOL.10o + ZC-- 44A. t. + 5 evoC- S MAA PAXE
Pexu A" P(- P- 4-3,5% -75*. )t iur- gir S&V h- -
ao
QO Ak2� 4152444457-t- 4Ao,zs-+4kl.
41Z.. 8 75'+ ZT 4157.8 7,'r+- -5- eocC 40-275r rif+,x Rly
PI.& Afbe,_r A4.76' ft(LTt)AL-
Ail
43 4ol.S-+ 41 OT 4o6,79 -t 4c,4- -75* AuUA4f-
ild
A
4bCK;� Z5"-,43i .'76. -43L.-6 rnp# Mu
3
40 C. 18,9 13
CITY OF EDMONDS BARBARA FAHEY
MAYOR
250 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 - (206) 771-0220 - FAX J206) 771-0221 -
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -
Public Works * Planning 9 Parks and Recreation 9 Engineering
March 31, 1997 A�C�
STREET FILE c/ 7
Del Erickson, P.E.
15020 S.E. 46th St.
Bellevue, WA 98006
Subject: Proposed 12 Unit Development 21217 - 76th Ave. W. (ADB-96-12jl
Dear Mr. Erickson,
The Engineering Division is not able to adequately review the submitted plans
because the storm calculations do not conform to SCS methodology as required
in the attached Ordinance No. 3013. Please revise the calculations and the
plans accordingly so that review of the project can take place. The Engineering
Division is withholding comments on any other issues until the revisions are
received. When the revisions are completed, please resubmit four sets of plans,
along with a set of the revised calculations.
If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact Don Fiene at 771-0220,
extension 323.
Sincerely,
i 0,
James C. Walker, P.E.
City Engineer
GCH/JCW1sf
Enclosures
cc: Lara Knaak, Permit Coordinator
A96121.DOC
0 Incorporated August 11, 1890 0
Sister Cities International — Hekinan, Japan
T'i �R
...... ..... . . . . . .
W, 4QAN4'.- N� -3A
Jt
ar 9�.
C;
.:Cr1NtJC�1U-k,A
K
tia *6, �g -0.0t4wil. opi"LVZ, i1:1 )t. ri� Mjw
f
qMe Critical Arms Che6khst t
on Y.. .1.1m city,
M1
_�Tq-j 75 ME
this form is to.* be filled out by any Person veview die
awidist. make a
1,eyelop
preparink,*aD...,,,_
NFISM4 amm adetpftinatiofibf theA.
Applicationfior thepity of Ednk4lds.
pno, s6 to complete a
to his/her submittal of -a d �,1.6,1�h--,c*i,.:dcvekpnentpmin7lt2pplicati-�,�,,�.'
permit to rde 16 on,
With a signed copy of this form, the
Ile purpose of -the- -,Checidist-is-to-enabld---,—.�.
ifi6uid also submit a vicinity map,
City staff to determuitie'-whethcrany— or plot plan for individual 1��,Pf the -parcel
.potential CriqpqL4Lreas a&' be.'
bf�may
VA enoio,� dl�i City staff can find
present on the subject
idea*
Tb
PrOPerty. o. e and!
d" ddW the a
informati6ri n6ddE I
W.Wmp cte the.: 0106
pplicant shall hieludi Iiii
ChecHist should be easily
available
'Observztions of the siteor dia'iir�iWi pogrs map,,e
W'6' lPbY--. tc-) or studies.in
CitY EW1 (Critic'Flz.1�4=,invenioxies mapt",
'"14i, lie"IihiitheckliA40'assist
or SW11 Sul VS).
nitheir prert'" iry,
inina
d L1 iz vwox,�_assessment of 1the.sit6.
An applicant; -or MiMer.
r --F' d i v
I repre��tative,
must fill out the checklist, sign and date it'.
I havi completed- the attachWCiiiia_A_.
rea Che6klist and attest that the answers provided are
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below). ---
Owner Appli
cant:' ---
A n
Me resentative:
V
&Af -
Name
...... W6�
-0*
Street Address
Stred Address
P -L?l K10 ITI Olm
City, State, ZIP
--.Phone ty,. State' ZIP. h
P ne."4ra. A'.
7777
Signature
Date.
signature
7.;
J
2
'Che 41
reas
aCritic
a.A
Site ln'fbriifi�ti��-,(sdt
Po
graohy/hydrph N'egetafion3
dd n:
&.w
-Site A r 4K
A I. le,
Property. Tax Account Number.
0
Approximate Site S of
ize (acres or square feet):
.151
4. Is this site currently developpd?
_&-yes; no.'
7
evel 6
If yes; how is site d oped?
PPP1_ _11;1
4k. f
5. Describe the general site topography- Check all that I - 11 V-1, �� J
its,
Flat: less than 5-feei V,��n change over ; eatire site.
R011ing: slopes on site ge�y.less than 15%,(a verdcaj.j�iseof�l()�_.feiet
over�
disj�� of C6�
E "V 15d.
jail
;v dar�.
IY!. -eopes present on site of more than 15% and less--diin,16%
of I t4eet ov"er a horizontaldistance of 33 to 66-feet)-j 1 %:1:3
SteeP: grades Of greater than 30% present on site (�,�eitic��.n-se of Mief , 'ovfx, a
horizontal distance of less than 33-feet).
_%:-Other. (Please describe):
6.- Site contains''areas of year-rou sta-lowgr water- Approx J
Depth:,,:
7. Site contains areasof.seasonal standing vrAter.: Appeox-'�Depth;".'
What s-eason(s) of the yearl.
Site is,
ii the floodway fl000pwn of a v�at�r'course.
9. Site*c6pitain eek ran
_;.a cr o area where water flows across the grounds surface? Hows 'year-..
MuM?. NO Flows are seasonal? (What time of year? !J4,
10. Site is primarily: forested shrubs ell-, -,.mixed
urban landscaped (lawn,shrubs etc)
11. Obvious wetland is present on site:
—For City Staff Use Only
I. Site ii Zoned?
2. SCS tnapped soil type(s)?
3. Wedand'inventory or C.A_ rnap indicates wetla�dpresent on site? A/c)
&I. :-,Critical Areas inventory or C.A. map indicates CXitical Area on site? -A/7)
5.. Site wilt�ih desi
gnatcd earth subsidence landslide hazard area?
6- ''Mic des'ignated on the EaviroomentallySen tive,4,reas Malp
si
.D
REQiJlkED
CONDMONAL WAIVER,
Reviimed by. 16'12 &N2
laidel—r 77
Date
KetQV0404 V'.:
MAR. 1 3,1897.
E COU
IT COU ER
RM
jil
'I.,
TUPMADDRESS:-V
City. U.Edwbn sq, Buildin' Division
9
-'250' th"Avenue North
1Edm'6ds,'-WA 98020
Reference #:
RECORD
E Ej
97 MAR 13 PM 2- 20.
AUDITOR
SNOHOMISH COUNTY. WASH.-
,DEPUTY--.
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MULTI-FAAMY RESIDENTIAL
BULDINo
MAR 2 8 1997
Grantor(s): (1) ad�ll-gv Additional on p
Grantee(s): City of Edmonds
Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec�.Ia-? - k/ Twn
Ang - 0 51Z Qtr
OR Lot
7-
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 4<6 6700 - 00 >
. Assessor's Tax Parcel IDN not yet assigned
WHEREAS,
are the owners of the rollowing described real estate in the City of Edmonds, to wit:
Property Address: -
Legal Description: 4zoox o"Id
0 Q') 'e9- 6 0 C, 5
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID N (s): �9�o 5/-'000 oo2 — j:20 0
WHEREAS, the above named owners are desirous of imposing a restrictive covenant upon
said premises in compliance with Section 19.00.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code.
VOL. 3 280PAEF062
Ea
V
,17. R
I; M,
ADDRESS:'''
00 of Edmonds, Building Division
`250 5th'Avenue** North
Edmonds. WA 98020
WrMSSEM that for and in consideration of the premises, the'above named -owners do
hereby declare and grant to the City of Edmonds as Grantee the following restrictive covenant, to -
wit:
That at the time of the execution of this Covenant the Grantors have agreed to the Ordinance
of the City of Edmonds provide that no building for multiple family housing may be erected on
subject property containing more than -- Z-5 units.
Said Covenant shall be binding upon all present and future owners of said real estate and their heirs,
successors and assigns.
DATED this day of -7 - 9 1� '19
GRANTOR
State of Washington
)ss
County of SnOhOmish I
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Brian K Goodnight _signed
this instrument, on oath stated that hetshe was authorized to execute the instrument and
aclmowledged it as the - grantor (title) of GOODMGM MM COMT (name of party
on behalf on whom instrument was executed) to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the
uses and purpses mentions in this instrument. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th
day of _.,L%sseM*Ph- 19 97
7- S. FtAr, -4'**, -
1A
#
NOTARY
No Wasl�mgton.
40
PUDUG
.0Z
commission expires
'00 -,0. Ju]Ly 31, 1999
10 �h .. -
Vo - Ir 23 0 Aly
0
**#**P WA
sells
VOL. 3280PA60627
97031302.8 5
I
PLANNING DATA
SITE ADDRESS:-21313,15,17 76th Avwe W DATE: 3/27/97
ZONING: RM 2.4 PLAN CHK#: 97-80 AD13 # 96-121
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 12 unit Multiple Family Building
SETBACKS:
Required Setbacks:
Front: 15 Left Side: 10 Right Side: 10 Rear: 15
Actual Setbacks:
Front: 1'-7 Left Side: Right Side: Rear:
CORNER LOT no (Yes/No)
LEGAL NONCONFORMING LAND USE DETERMINATION ISSUED NO (Y/N)
LOT COVERAGE: 1 0
Maximum Allowed: 45% Actual: 2 �
BUILDING HEIGHT:
Maximum Allowed: 25'+ 5'for a 4:12 roof Actual Height:
Datum Point:Y/, Datum Elevation: /7'/T,
SUBDIVISION / LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT: No
CRITICAL AREAS #:
� - -Zl I VA
SEPA DETERMINATION: DNS w/ADB, appeal exp 12/10/96
jsz
LOT AREA:
DENSITY ALLOWED 1 per 2,400 s.f. UNITS ALLOWED 1.3 PROPOSED 12
BONDING REQUIRED (ys/no)-Igs .(for.what?) Landscaping $ /�d 2- 00
OTHER:
Plan Review By:
CEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
13256 N.E. 20th St. (Northup Way). Suite 16
Bellevue, WA 98005
(206) 747-5618
FAX 747-8561
Goodnight Brothers Construction
P.O. Box 669
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Attention: Brian Goodnight
APR 0 1 1997
PERMIT COUNTER
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Considerations
Proposed Rose Ridge Condominiums
21317 - 76th Avenue West
Edmond, Washington
Dear Mr. Goodnight:
-T
March 31, 1997
JN 97115
On March 28, 1997, a geotechnical engineer from our office visited the site of the proposed Rose
Ridge Condominiums at 21317 - 76th Avenue West in Edmonds, Washington. The purpose of
this visit was to explore site subsurface conditions and to provide recommendations for foundation
design. The recommendations and conclusion presented in this report are professional opinions
based on the visual observations made during our site visit and on previous experience with other
projects in the vicinity.
We understand that you propose to construct three multi -unit buildings, totaling 12 units, on the
project site. The two westemmost building will have wood framed floors constructed over a crawl
space. The easternmost structure will have a daylight basement.
The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating four test pits in or near the proposed
building footprints. The test pits were excavated on March 28, 1997, with a trackhoe provided by
the client. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process and logged
the test pits. The test pit logs are maintained in our files and are available upon request.
The site has been cleared and most of the topsoil removed. The soils at the test pit locations
generally consist of one to three feet of loose to medium -dense reddish -brown silty sand with
some gravel and roots, overlying several feet of medium -dense to dense gravelly sand. The
gravelly sand is underlain by dense to very dense glacial till soils consisting of gray silty sand with
gravel to a maximum explored depth of eight feet. No groundwater seepage was observed in the
test pits. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors.
It is possible that perched groundwater could be found between the near -surface weathered soil
and the underlying dense glacial till.
A
I
Goodnight Brothers Construction
March 31, 1997
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
JN 97115
Page 2
Based on the observations made during our site visit, it appears that construction of the three
condominium buildings is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The structures can
be supported on conventional foundations that bear on competent native soils underlying the site.
The proposed buildings can be supported on conventional footings bearing directly on medium -
dense to dense native gravelly sand or the dense to very dense glacial till soils. These soils were
encountered at about 1 to 3 feet in the test pits. Continuous and isolated footings should have
minimum widths of 12 inches and 16 inches, respectively. The footing subgrades must be cleaned
of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete.
Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may be designed for an allowable
soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). A one-third increase in this design
bearing pressure may be used when conside(ing short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above
design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post -construction settlement of footings founded on
competent, native soils will be about one-half inch.
Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and
the bearing soil. We recommend using an allowable coefficient of friction equal to 0.40 for the
foundation's resistance to lateral loading.
LIMITATIONS
The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site
conditions as they existed at the time of our site visit. If the subsurface conditions encountered
du(ing construction are significantly different from those anticipated, we should be advised at once
so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary.
Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites. Such unexpected
conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed
project.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Goodnight Brothers Construction and its
representAtives for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and
conclusions are based on the site materials observed and on previous experience with sites that
have similar observed conditions. The conclusions and recommendations are professional
opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the limited scope of our
services. No warranty is expressed or implied.
We trust that this report meets. your immediate needs for the proposed development. Please
contact us, if we can be of further service.
Goodnight Brothers Construction JN 97115
March 31, 1997 Page 3
Respectfully submitted,
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
F, R T
29740
AL V'
I EXPIRES U) -2�1,--17 1
D. Robert Ward, P.E.
Associate
DRW:mmm
�� -VC14-, iT'T
C
City of Edmonds
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT Per I mit Number:
Issue Date: /0 -070 -
A. Address or Vicinity of Construction: C;I\
B Type of Work (be snecific)-.NR(--� U�kv� C �'X---e i?AQ K"�,SD
9 0 - I C) 9 - - -e
2,V�;\MA- CLCC7k SLN�-
. Co
Contractor:'C—*VArJMVZ:A CWW, P.0b"I Intact: bc P1
Mailing Address: Alr�\b 4Q�-( Phone: 7 Q - 0 'c'S
State License #: C20"Wos uA 9&&O�—ko Liability Insurance: Bond: $
D. Building Permit # (if applicable):
E. F-1 Commercial [:] Subdivision
Multi -Family El SingleFamily
x I
INSPECTOR: 64#14&UM
Side Sewer Permit # (if applicable):
EJ City Project Y Utility (PUD, GTE, WNG, CABLE, WATER)
M Other
I NSPECTOR:
F. Pavement or Concrete Cut es []No G. Size of Cut: x H. Charge$
APPLICANT TO READ A GPN
INDEMNITY. Applicant understands and by his signature to this application, agrees to, j1de City of Edmonds hairdesIA—Viu, ;77q�ages, or
claims of any kind or description whatsoever, foreseen or unforeen, that may be made againsPhe City of Edmonds, or a4 of its departments or. employ-
ees, including or not limited to the defense of any legal proceedings including defense coss`is�>anj,'�,Ztc'�'rney fees by reason of drantin§'ziiis p�rmit,P
THE CON7RA CTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WORKMANSHIP A AD MA 7ERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FOLLO W[NG THE FINAL INSPECITON
AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK ES77MA TED RESTORATION FEES WILL BE HELD UN77L THE FINAL STREET PATCH IS COMPLETED BY
CITY FORCES, AT WHICH 77ME A DEBIT OR CREDIT WILL BE PROCESSED F0"R)I§SqANCE TO THE APPLICANT,_
Construction drawing of proposed work Aequ 'ired wito-permit application.
A 24 hour notice is required for inspection; Please call th� ' EAgifieering Departmelm",-,,',
Work is to be inspected during progress and at completion.
Restoration is to be in accordance with City Codes. 771-0220
Street shall be kept clean at all times.
Traffic Control and Public Safety shall be in accordance with City regulations as required by the City Egpirtbec.
All street cut ditches shall be patched with asphalt or City approved rnatfjja�,I!�ipr to the end ofAK�oTogMay;
NO EXCEPTIONS.
I have read the above statements and understand the permit requirements and the pink copy,of the permit will be available
11 fi
on site at atjjknes o nspe pn,�
Signature:Wl= Date:
(Contractor or Ag�njt
CALL DIAIA-DIG PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK
. .......... - .............. -
FOR C ITY USE ONLY
.......... ......... ..... ..... ..... ....
. . . ............. ...
. .. . . ........
.:::APPROVED: BY:.., RIGHT: OF WAY: DEPO.sIT:::::;�
. .. ..... . ......... . ......
.TIME:AUTHORIZED: VOID:AFTER...........qO....-
......... -DAYS DISRUPTION FEE/FUND 1.11
SPECIAL.CONDITIONS: .REST(
PERM
...... .......
.......... .. ...... ........
.... .. .. .. .. .... . .
.... .. ..... ...............
- 1 :0 .'0
7�
-DATE: ..—.,.......ISSUED,BY:-.
Engrg. Div. 1991
FIELD INSPECTION NOTES (Fund I I I Route copy to Street WPO i�,
Comments:
Diagram:
CONTRACTOR CALLED FOR INSPECTION 0 YES 0 NO
Partial Work Inspection by P. W.:
Work Disapproved By: Date:
FINAL APPROVAL BY: Date:
Eng. Div. July
NOTICE:
No warranty of accuracy.
The information shown on the attached
map(s) was compiled for use by the City of
Edmonds, its Employees and Consultants.
The City of Edmonds does not warrant the
accuracy of anything set forth on these
map(s). Any person or entity requesting a
copy should conduct an independent
inquiry regarding the information shown on
the map(s), including, but not limited to,
the location of any sewer stub shown. Such
sewerstubs may or may not exist and may
or may not exist at the location shown.
Neither the City of Edmonds nor its
employees or officers shall be liable- for the
information given on this map(s), nor for
any one representation provided based
upon said map(s).
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER — WATER -SEWER DEPARTMENT Call PROsPect 6-1107 when work
Is ready for Inspeetion. (No Ing
pe`�
SIDESEWER PERMIT tiOns Satttrday� Sunday or holidays.) N -0 1091
ADDRESS .............
OWNER ........ ?4i.CkPy ... IIQS.MQ
............................................. CONTRACTOR .... RiT).&f
. .. ..............
Permission is granted ----------- JIMe-.24 ................. for ---------------------- days, to REPAIR or CONNECT a side sewer
With CRY Sewers in acc'ordance with application on file and governing ordinances.
ATTENTION IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTE No. 1—The owners of the Property May Obtain a permit to construct sewer inside Property line. A licensed Side Sewer Contractor must
be employed to construct side sewer In street are& DO not cover any portion Of sewer before it has been inspected.
E No. 2--Obtain full Information regarding Ordinance 11.16.0W and Reg
ulations governing side Sewers when you get permit.
E No. 3—Top, of side sewer must have at least 30 inches coverage at property line and 12 inches
No bends In grade sharper than % will be permitted. Inside property line; minimum gr ads of 2%.
NOTE No. 4—Trenches in street must be water settled and surface of street,restored to original condition. Contractors shall be responsible for
failure due to improper work which may develop within one year of completion.
NOTE No. &--It is unlawful to alter or do any other work than is provided for in the permit, or to do any work on the main Sewer- or Its ap-
Purtena.nces except to Insert the pipe Into the wye.
FILE
7jt'�r. i�f Edmondi
TIOK-
1 Z A P E R M ff
OUTSIDE -�"R��SIDE b
Olw .. ....
-74
H 0 U S E N on—. �710 V(5
. .................................................................... ............ ...................
e-, ttJF-s
7-
col
7'
�",CARb "'No.
EASEMENT No . ..........
.... CONTRACTOR ..... .......................................... .................. PERMIT N
It
.. . . .......
STREET
.... AVENUE LOT No . ......
BLOCK No . ............................. ...........
NAME ADD ....
...........
. / ................................... ........ ...... . . .. .......
REPAIRS 0
7(7--
�f - -------- 4
A P P R 0 V E
Date Approved:
BACKFILL WORK ORDER ISSUED .................. .......................... DEPOSIT, ....... ..............................................
- /' ��7 B)�. ... .. ........ .....
SEWER WORK ORDER ISSUED ................................................ DATE.A/ -e.'
-/ ................... ...
. .............
. ......... ......
REVISION No. 2
HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS
FOR
21313-17 76-ti-i
6001� . �v (
VJ
ZIV � �) ,
� f0A -
[-WIRES -12 -1 q)
April. 1997
Applicant: Engineer:
Goodnight Brothers ConsC. Del Erickson, P.E.
P.O. Box 669- 15020 S.E. 46th St.
Edmonds, WA. 98020 Bellevue, Wa. 98006
Tel: 517-4961 Tel: 747-5825
� 00
WPiJRIRA'k71C X N7 IE
DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS:
Attached hereto is a copy of the Off -Site Analysis
prepared in December of 1995 by Land Development
Consultants for the Rose Pointe Condos (parcel lying
immediately north of the subject site). The downstream
system for the subject project is identical to that
described in the attached Off -Site analysis.
OFF -SITE DRAINAGE:
Contours generally fall across the property from the
west to the east and southeast. No off -site runoff
enters the subject parcel. It is bounded on the north
by the Rose Pointe Condos whose storm drainage system
collects and contains all runoff falling on that property.
It is bounded on the west by 76th Avenue West which has
curb and gutter, preventing any street runoff from entering
the property. No runoff enters from the south or east as
contours fall away from the site in those directions.
WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY CONTROLS:
Runoff from the parcel is directed to an existing piped
storm system bordering the subject property along its
east property line. This piped system carries the site
runoff to an ultimate discharge into Hall Creek. Storm
water quantity controls for sites less than one acre
in size, and discharging to a stream have been
utilized for the subject site. Water quality control
is not required as the site has only 2 outside parking
stalls. Water quantity control will be provided by a
buried 84 inch diameter detention pipe and outlet control
system designed to limit the peak rate of runoff to the
pre -developed condition two-year, twenty-four hour design
storm, while maintaining the pre -developed condition peak
runoff rate for the ten-year twenty-four hour and one -
hundred year, twenty-four hour storms.
OFF -SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS PREPARED IN DECEMBER 1995
BY LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS FOR THE ROSE"POINTE
CONDOS WHICH BORDER THE SUBJECT PARCEL ALONG ITS NORTH
PROPERTY LINE. THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN THIS
ANALYSIS THE THE SAME SYSTEM TO WHICH WE WILL BE DISCHARGING
OUR DETAINED STORMWATER RUNOFF.
DOWN -STREAM.DRAINAG E
The off -site drainage down -stream from the property is shown in Figure 3. Surface
water leaves the subject property through the existing catch basin (station 0+00)
located and the southeast corner of the subject property. The drainage flow then
continues traveling south about 240 feet through an 12" storm drain to another catch
basin on 214th St. SVV (sta. 3+40). The drainage flow then travels east along 214th St.
SW through 12" storm drains and five catch basins. to 73rd Pl. W. (sta. 5+11). The
drainage flow then travels south along 73rd Pl. W. through 12" storm drains and five
catch basins to 216th St. SW (sta-. 10+30). . The drainage flow then travels east along
216th St. SW through a 24" storm drain lo station 13+20 and the end of the required
path analysi% From this point the storm drains appear to continue easterly crossing
Stale Route 99 and out.of the Edmonds City Limits.
Alf the downstream drainage -facilities appeared to be, functioning adequately. No
significant sedimentation, erosion or. flooding problems were observed in the down-
stream drainage course. Deyplopment of the subject project will not permanently
increase the sedimentation, erosion or flooding in the down -stream drainage courses.
0"-:U9A BIWUL'. GO(JUNIGI-I'l-
bPP 113 97 07: 56 LAND DE(JELOPMENT CONSULT ANTS
206-6"72-7837 P.02
2064818785 TO: 206 6-42 74837 P02
a
sow
P., 0 ;- 0
Rt
ty
v
to),
z
x
A '3AV
is
'PUZIL
7
f2
To' 71r
vi Ivi S, NIHOSV7
ea
N IL
vi
t
ve
rA
10 - . I
00, It .1 -)
0 ui
c 1.1.1y
co *
N IQ t -
SIP-